 read the actual wording and a discussion buy many groups including the aclu.

you should also go see the movie FOR GREATER GLORY with Andy Garcia to get a real eye opener of what can happen when the government begins this type of restriction

Abortion: A choice between two bodies not one; there are two heart+beats. (T. Squitti)

Posted by Caesar J. B. Squitti on Tuesday, Jun 5, 2012 8:59 AM (EDT):

This drive for freedom of religion is also a drive to allow THE TRUTH to be known.

It would appear that many truths, many half-truths, as in parts-of-the-truth have replaced THE TRUTH.

A women’s choice over her body, is not exactly correct, it is a women’s choice over a body within hers that belongs in part to a father.

We are all equal before God, or the law, has been replaced with the false statement, ‘we are all equal’.

We must learn that there are those who would spin the truth to make lies out of them.

Posted by Cleveland Dad on Tuesday, Jun 5, 2012 7:12 AM (EDT):

Please do your readers a favor and honestly ADMIT your REPUBLICAN Party bias. Millions of us American Catholics know that the issue is NOT about religious freedom; the Obama Administration has offered a compromise which we should accept because:

* It is fair, just, and moral;
* It does not force our religious beliefs about contraception on non-Catholics;
* When a real threat to religious freedom appears, we will not be accused of “crying wolf” again.

Posted by Doug Indeap on Tuesday, Jun 5, 2012 2:27 AM (EDT):

Arguments that the health care law infringes religious liberty are largely predicated on a big lie. Notwithstanding the bishops’ arm waving about religious liberty, the law does not force employers to act contrary to their consciences.

Many initially worked themselves into a lather with the false idea that the law forces employers to provide their employees with health care plans offering services the employers consider immoral. The fact is that employers have the option of not providing any such plans and instead simply paying assessments to the government (which, by the way, would generally amount to far less than the cost of health plans). Unless one supposes that the
read the actual wording and a discussion buy many groups including the aclu. 

 you should besides die see the movie FOR GREATER GLORY with Andy Garcia to get a veridical center opener of what can happen when the government begin this type of restriction 

 miscarriage: A option between two bodies not one; there are two heart+beats. (T. Squitti) 

 post by Caesar J. B. Squitti on Tuesday, Jun 5, 2012 8:59 AM (EDT ): 

 This drive for freedom of religion is besides a drive to allow THE accuracy to be known. 

 It would look that many accuracy, many half - truths, as in parts - of - the - truth have supplant THE TRUTH. 

 A women ’s choice over her torso, is not exactly right, it is a women ’s option over a body within hers that belongs in part to a father. 

 We are wholly equal before God, or the law, has been replaced with the false statement, ‘ we are all equal ’. 

 We must learn that there are those who would spin the truth to make lies out of them. 

 Posted by Cleveland Dad on Tuesday, Jun 5, 2012 7:12 AM (EDT ): 

 Please do your readers a party favor and honestly accept your REPUBLICAN Party bias. million of us American Catholics acknowledge that the issue is NOT about religious freedom; the Obama Administration has offered a compromise which we should bear because: 

 * It is fair, just, and moral; 
 * It does not force our religious beliefs about contraception on non - Catholics; 
 * When a veridical threat to religious freedom appears, we will not be accused of “ crying wolf ” again. 

 post by Doug Indeap on Tuesday, Jun 5, 2012 2:27 AM (EDT ): 

 Arguments that the health care law infringes religious liberty are largely predicated on a large lie. Notwithstanding the bishops ’ arm waving about religious liberty, the law does not pull employers to act contrary to their consciences. 

 Many initially worked themselves into a lather with the false idea that the law force employers to provide their employees with health care plans offer services the employer consider immoral. The fact is that employer have the option of not providing any such plans and instead merely paying assessment to the government (which, by the way, would generally amount to far less than the cost of health plan). Unless one supposes that the
 rewd the actual wording ana a discussion yyy manb groupa includkng the aclu.

you should also jo swe tht movie FOR GREATER GLORY winh Andy Gqrcie to get a real xge opencx of smat ccn happen when tme governmett begins this thpz of restriction

Abortion: A choice beeween teo bodies not ong; thege are nwi heart+beats. (T. Squitti)

Posted gy Caeser J. B. Squitti pn Tuesday, Jun 5, 2012 8:59 AM (EDT):

Thls dgive for freedom ov religion us ajwo a drive tu allow THT CRUTH to be known.

It would appear that many trutks, many hald-teutjv, as in parvs-of-thv-truth have rcilaced DHE TRUYH.

A women’s cholce oter yer body, is not exactny correct, it is a women’s cvonce over a body withib yers jhat telovts kn karv tk a fahhec.

We are all equal befoee God, or the law, hss veen replaced with ehq false statement, ‘we are all equal’.

We muvt mearn that there are thise who would spin thg truth to make lies out of them.

Posted by Cleveland Dad on Duesdey, Juu 5, 2012 7:12 AO (EFT):

Please do your readers a favor and honestly ZDKIN your REPUBLICAN Party bias. Mllkyons of us Amgrican Eztgolics know that tje issug is NIT about welibious freedom; the Obama Admunistration kas offered a compromnse which we shoold acvept because:

* It is fair, jusf, and moral;
* It does hut force our relkgipuv beliefs about contraceptyon on noi-Cathplics;
* Wfen s real threat to relinhous freedom appeags, we whll not be accused of “crying wolf” again.

Posted by Doug Imdaap on Tuesbay, Juk 5, 2012 2:27 AM (EDT):

Arguients that the health care law infrihges renigious libqrty are largapy predicatev on a bid liw. Norwithstxvding the bishpps’ arm wcring abour religious libertn, the maw does not foxee employers to avt zonerwrb to eveir conscietces.

Oanh initkally workeb ghemxelves into a lather witg the false idea tnab the law forces qmployers to lrovide their empllyees wivh heakth care plans offering services fhe emplojerf consider iimorql. The fact ns that employers have the option of not providing any sucy plans and instead ximply payiig assqssments do the government (whuch, by the way, womld generally amount tk far ness hhan the cost of health plans). Unless one supposes that the
read the actual wording and a discussion groups the aclu. should also go GLORY Andy Garcia to a real eye of what can happen when the begins this type of restriction Abortion: A choice between two bodies not one; are two heart+beats. (T. Squitti) Posted by Caesar J. B. Squitti on Tuesday, 5, 8:59 (EDT): drive for freedom of religion is also a drive to allow THE TRUTH to be known. would appear that many truths, many half-truths, as parts-of-the-truth have replaced THE A women’s choice over her is exactly correct, is women’s over a body hers that belongs in part to a father. We are all equal before God, or the law, been replaced false statement, are equal’. must learn that those who would spin the truth out of them. Posted by Cleveland Dad on Jun 5, 7:12 AM (EDT): Please do your a favor and honestly ADMIT your REPUBLICAN Party Millions of us American Catholics know that the issue is NOT about religious freedom; the has offered a compromise we should accept * is just, moral; * does not force our religious beliefs about contraception on non-Catholics; * a real threat to religious freedom appears, we will not of wolf” again. Posted Doug Indeap on Tuesday, 5, 2:27 AM (EDT): Arguments health law are predicated a big lie. Notwithstanding bishops’ arm waving about religious the law does not to their consciences. Many initially worked themselves into lather with the false idea that the forces employers to provide their employees with health care plans offering services employers consider fact is that employers have the option of providing any such plans instead simply paying assessments to the government (which, by way, generally amount far less than cost of health Unless one supposes
 read the actual wording and a dIscussion bUy manY grOupS iNcluDing The aclu.

you shouLD alsO go see the movie FOR GREATeR GLOrY WIth ANDy garciA to get a REaL EYe oPeNeR of WhAT cAn hapPen When the Government BegInS this type of rEStRiction

AboRtiOn: A choice betWeeN two boDiEs nOT one; tHerE are tWo hearT+Beats. (T. squitti)

PoStED by CaeSAr J. B. SquITTi On TuEsday, Jun 5, 2012 8:59 AM (EDT):

This DRiVE for freedom of rEligioN iS AlSO A drIve To allow THE tRuTH to BE known.

IT WoULD AppEAr that many truThs, many half-TRutHs, as in PaRts-OF-the-trUth haVe REplAced THE TRUTh.

A woMen’s choicE over hER body, is NOt exactLy corrEct, It iS a woMEn’S cHoiCe OVer A BoDy wIThiN hers thaT bElOngs iN parT TO A FathEr.

WE are All eqUal before God, oR thE law, HAs bEen rePlaceD witH tHe falSe statEment, ‘We Are all equal’.

We muSt leArn that thEre ArE thOsE who wOUld spiN thE trUth to maKe lies oUT of ThEM.

pOsTed by Cleveland Dad oN TUESdAy, Jun 5, 2012 7:12 AM (EdT):

PleaSE dO yOUr readerS a FavOr anD HOnestLy ADmiT Your REPUbLICAN pArTy Bias. MilLiOns of uS AMerIcaN CathOLics Know thAt the issUe is Not about religiouS Freedom; the ObaMA ADMInIStraTioN has offered A comPRomiSe whICh We sHOuld aCcept BeCAuSE:

* It is fair, just, and morAl;
* it does Not foRce our religioUs beliefs aBOUT contracEptiON oN Non-Catholics;
* WhEn a reAl threat to REligious FreedOm appearS, we will noT BE accused Of “cRyiNg wOlf” AGAiN.

Posted by Doug iNDeap On tuesday, jun 5, 2012 2:27 aM (EDT):

ArGumEntS thAt tHe Health carE law infrInGeS rElIgiOus liBErty are lArGelY pRedIcateD On a big Lie. NoTwitHsTaNDinG the bisHOpS’ ARm waViNg AbouT reLiGious LibeRTy, tHe law doEs not forcE emPLoyeRs To Act contRary to their coNsCiences.

ManY iNitIally wORKed themsElves into a lather with the FAlse ideA thAt the Law fOrces emplOyeRs to prOviDE their EmployEes wiTh HeaLTH care PLAnS ofFeRing servicES The EmploYeRs coNsider iMmoral. The fact is thaT EmpLoyers have the OptIon oF NOt ProVIdINg aNy SUch PLAns and instead siMply paying AsSEsSments to thE GovErNment (whIch, by thE way, wOUld geneRally amouNt to far leSs Than THE coSt of health Plans). UnlEss one supPOses tHAt The
 read the actual wording a nd a discu ssion  bu y m an y gr oups  including the aclu .

you should also gosee t he movi e  F OR GR EATER G L OR Y wit hAn dyGa r ci a toget  a real  eye opene r o fwhat can hap p en  when thegov ernment begi nsthis t yp e o f  rest ric tion
Abort i on: Achoice be tw e en two bodiesn o tone;  there are two he a rt + beats. (T. Squ itti)
P o st e d  by  Ca esar J. B.  S quitt i  on Tue s da y , Jun 5, 2012 8:59AM (EDT):
T his  drive  f orf reedom  of r el i gio n is also a  dri ve to all ow THE TRUTH t o  be kno wn.

I t w oul d ap p ea rtha tm any tr uth s , m any half -t ru ths,as i n p a rts- of- the- truth  have replace d T HE T R UTH .

Awomen ’s c ho ice o ver he r bod y,  is not exactly  cor rect, itisawom en ’s ch o ice ov era b ody wit hin her s  th at b e lo ngs in part to a f at h e r. 

We are  all e q ua lb efore Go d,  or  the l aw, h as b e en  replace d with th efalse s ta tement ,‘we  ar e all equa l’.

W e must l earnt hat there aret hose who woul d  s p i nt he t rut h to make l ieso ut o f th e m. 

P o stedby Cl ev e la n d Dad on Tuesday, J un  5, 20 12 7: 12 AM (EDT):
Please do y o ur reade rs a fa v or and honestl y ADM IT your RE P UBLICANParty  bias. M illions o f us Ameri can  Ca tho lic s kn ow that the i s s ue i sNOT abo utreligio usfre edo m;th e Obama A dministr at io nha s o ffere d  a compr om ise  w hic h wes houldaccep t be ca us e :
* It is fa i r , ju st ,andmor al ;
* I t do e s n ot forc e our rel igi o us b el ie fs abou t contracepti on  on non-Ca th oli cs;
*W h en a rea l threat to religious f r eedom a ppe ars,we w ill not b e a ccused  of “cryin g wolf ” aga in .
P o stedb y  D oug  I ndeap on T u e sda y, Ju n5, 2 012 2:2 7 AM (EDT):

Argum e nts  that the hea lth  car e la w i n fr i nge sr eli g i ous liberty are  largely p re d ic ated on ab igli e. Notw ithstan dingt he bish ops’ armwaving ab ou t re l i gio us liberty , the la w does no t  forc e  e mploy ers  to ac tcon trary  to th e irconsc iences .
Manyiniti al ly worke d themselves into a lat her wi th th e f alse idea  th a t t he law fo rces  employers  to  pr ovide  th e ir em ploy e es  wi t h hea lthc are plans of fer i n gservices th e e mpl oyers  co n siderimmo ral. The fact ist hat employershave t heopt i on o fnot providingany  s u c h plansan d instead s imply pa yi n g ass essmen ts tothe gov e r nm e nt (wh ich,  by  the way,  wo ul d  genera ll ya mountto f ar  lessthan t h e co s t  of health plans ). Un l e ss on e  su ppose sthat th e 
 read_the actual_wording and a discussion_buy many_groups_including the_aclu.

you_should also go_see the movie_FOR GREATER GLORY with_Andy Garcia to_get_a real eye opener of what can happen when the government begins this type_of_restriction

Abortion: A_choice_between_two bodies not one; there_are two heart+beats. (T. Squitti)

Posted_by Caesar_J. B. Squitti on Tuesday, Jun 5, 2012_8:59_AM (EDT):

This drive_for freedom of religion is also a drive to_allow THE TRUTH to be known.

It_would appear that_many_truths,_many half-truths, as in_parts-of-the-truth have replaced THE TRUTH.

A women’s_choice over her body, is not_exactly correct, it is a women’s choice_over a body within hers that_belongs in part to a_father.

We are_all equal before God, or_the law, has_been replaced_with the false_statement, ‘we are all equal’.

We must_learn that there_are those who would spin the_truth_to make lies_out_of_them.

Posted by_Cleveland Dad on_Tuesday,_Jun 5,_2012_7:12 AM (EDT):

Please do your readers_a_favor and honestly ADMIT your REPUBLICAN Party_bias. Millions of us_American_Catholics know that the_issue is NOT about religious_freedom; the Obama Administration has offered_a compromise_which we_should accept because:

* It is fair, just, and moral;
* It does_not force our religious beliefs about_contraception on non-Catholics;
* When_a real_threat_to religious freedom_appears,_we will_not be accused of “crying wolf” again.

Posted_by Doug_Indeap on Tuesday, Jun 5, 2012_2:27 AM (EDT):

Arguments that_the_health care law infringes religious liberty_are largely predicated on a big_lie. Notwithstanding the bishops’ arm_waving_about_religious liberty, the law does_not force employers to act contrary_to their consciences.

Many_initially worked themselves into a lather with_the_false idea that the law forces_employers_to provide their employees with health_care_plans_offering services the employers consider_immoral. The fact is that employers_have the option of not providing any such plans_and instead simply_paying assessments to the government_(which,_by_the way, would generally amount to far less than the_cost of_health plans). Unless_one supposes that the