: two people cannot be partners if they are not socially equal if one of them considers herself superior.

Thus, my vision for India contains the idea of a nation where there is no hierarchy, neither social nor political, where people are not castigated based on their castes, or religion or ‘otherwise’, where the mind is open to accept everything, live with everything.

The above thought pattern may seem like a polemic to someone. But in all honesty, that is the only course of action that is available to us. It is an idealistic response to something very real viz. non-ideal because one of the most real facts in the world is: a normal human will not rid himself off power if he has some.

We are naturally wired to harness and use power because we all love control. In contemporary parlance, we all want to be influencers. We are not what Mahatma Gandhi is in our eyes or Dumbledore from the Harry Potter series, who shuns absolute power because he knows what power does to us, mere humans.

When I try to imagine an ideal India, a society in all its colours—in which everyone is comfortable being who they are—comes to my mind. I see a society in which the political ideals of fraternity and equality have been accepted by our collective mind, in which we are so informed and educated that we never allow communalistic designs of sycophants to succeed.

I imagine an India where everyone has a voice, not just because the constitution has given her a voice, but because others let her speak and encourage her to speak if she doesn’t. In my India, everyone should be able to use her voice without fear, especially against those who want to benefit from the differences of People. An India in which everyone is an equal partner and doesn’t have to ‘sell’ his ‘voice’ in exchange for a privilege, which should be his right. An India in which an imposed equality has been naturalized.

Having said that, two major two issues are plaguing India, both connected and blocking India’s progress towards a visionistic future.

Problem 1: Centralization Of Power

One is of course: the centralization of power via a devious mechanism, prevalent throughout the world and an opposition which (I must humbly accept) could not offer a solid defense; the citizens of India gave too much power in the hands of one person/party. This centralization of power
: two people cannot be partners if they are not socially equal if one of them considers herself superscript. 

 therefore, my vision for India contains the theme of a state where there is no hierarchy, neither social nor political, where people are not castigated establish on their castes, or religion or ‘ otherwise ’, where the judgment is open to accept everything, be with everything. 

 The above thought pattern may appear like a polemicist to someone. But in all honesty, that is the only course of legal action that is available to us. It is an idealistic response to something very very viz. non - ideal because one of the most real facts in the earth is: a normal human will not rid himself off power if he hold some. 

 We are naturally wire to harness and use power because we all love control. In contemporaneous parlance, we all want to be influencers. We are not what Mahatma Gandhi is in our eyes or Dumbledore from the Harry Potter series, who shuns absolute power because he knows what might do to us, mere humans. 

 When I try to imagine an ideal India, a society in all its colours — in which everyone is comfortable being who they are — comes to my mind. I attend a society in which the political ideals of brotherhood and equality have been accept by our corporate mind, in which we are so informed and educated that we never allow communalistic designs of sycophants to succeed. 

 I imagine an India where everyone has a part, not just because the constitution has given her a voice, but because others let her speak and promote her to speak if she does n’t. In my India, everyone should be able to use her voice without fear, especially against those who want to profit from the difference of People. An India in which everyone is an equal partner and does n’t have to ‘ sell ’ his ‘ voice ’ in exchange for a prerogative, which should be his right. An India in which an inflict equality has been naturalized. 

 Having said that, two major two issue are plaguing India, both connected and blocking India ’s progress towards a visionistic future. 

 Problem 1: Centralization Of Power 

 One is of path: the centralization of power via a devious mechanism, prevailing throughout the world and an opposition which (I must meanly accept) could not offer a solid defense; the citizens of India give too much power in the hands of one person / party. This centralization of power
: twl people cannot be partntrs if they are not socielly eqhal if ove of them considers herself syperiir.

Thus, my vision for Ivdia contwins the idee of a nation whxde therc is hl hizrerchy, neither spcial nor [olitical, whera oelple are not castigated based on thqir casyed, or religion jr ‘ouhewwiss’, where the mind is open to accept everytiing, live with rverything.

The above thoughh pahtern may seem likf a polemic to fimeone. But iv all honesty, that is jhe only course of action that ir avanlable to uw. Ut lv an idealiwtic gesponse to something very rral viz. non-idesl uecayse one of the most rxal facts in the worjd is: a nmrjal human will nor eid hhmsenf owd puwed mf ge has soje.

We are nzturally wieed to harness and isq power becauss we ajl love control. In contemporary parlance, fe zll want to be influencwrs. We are not what Mwhatma Gagdhi is in our eyes or Dumbledore from the Harry [ottec rerncf, qhl shuns absolute power because he knows what [kwtr coes to us, merc humans.

When I try tl oiagine an idexl Indnz, z society in all ihs coloors—in qhich evewyonr is comfortable being who rhey are—comef to my mind. I see c society in whivh thr political ideals of fxaternjty and equwlity havs been accepted bh olr cmllectivt mind, in which we are so iiformzd and eaucajed thae we never allow communalistic deslgns lf sycophantd to succeed.

I imagine an India xiere everyone hds d voice, uot juxt because thq constitution has giren hef a voice, gut beceuse others jet her speak wnd encouragx her to fpeaj if she dodrn’t. In my Indis, everyonv fhouod be able to use mer vujce without feax, tspecially againxt ghofe wio wagd to benefit froo tfr difwerences of Oeopke. An India in which evedyone is an equal lavtner and doesn’t rave to ‘sell’ nis ‘voice’ in exchajge fmr e privolede, which should be his right. Ah India ij wmich an imposqd ewuality has yeen naturalized.

Having said that, two majir two issues are plaguing India, both gonnected anv bloching Indid’s progress towards q visionistic futmre.

Problem 1: Centralizafion Ox Powfr

One is of course: the centralization of power via a devious mechanism, prwvalenv ehroughout fhe eorld aud cn oppofitili which (I must hukbly accept) could not offer a sulid defanfe; the citizens of India gavr goo much powet in the hands of one perskn/party. Yhis centralization of power
: two people cannot be partners if not equal if of them considers for contains the idea a nation where is no hierarchy, neither social nor where people are not castigated based on their castes, or religion or ‘otherwise’, the mind is open to accept everything, live with everything. The above thought may like polemic someone. But in all honesty, that is the only course of action that is available to It is an idealistic response to something very viz. non-ideal because one the most real facts in world a normal will rid off power if has some. We are naturally wired to harness and use power because we all love control. In parlance, we to be We not Mahatma Gandhi is eyes or Dumbledore from the Harry shuns absolute power because he knows what power to us, humans. When I try to imagine ideal India, a society in all its colours—in everyone is comfortable being who they are—comes to my mind. I see a society in political ideals of fraternity equality have been by collective in we are informed and educated that we never allow communalistic designs of sycophants succeed. I imagine an India where everyone has a voice, because constitution has given a voice, but because let speak and encourage her if doesn’t. everyone be to use her voice fear, especially against those who to benefit from the in which everyone is an equal partner and have to ‘sell’ his ‘voice’ in exchange a privilege, which should be his right. An India in which an equality has Having said that, two major two issues are India, both connected and India’s progress towards a visionistic future. Problem 1: Centralization Power is of the centralization of via a devious prevalent throughout the an opposition (I humbly offer a solid defense; the citizens India too much power in the of This centralization of power
: two people cannot be partners If they are nOt socIalLy eQuAl if One oF them considers HErseLf superior.

Thus, my vision For InDiA ContAInS the iDea of a nATiON WheRe ThEre Is NO hIerarChy, Neither Social nor pOliTiCal, where peopLE aRe not castiGatEd based on theIr cAstes, oR rEliGIon or ‘OthErwisE’, where THe mind Is open to aCcEPt everYThing, liVE WiTh evErything.

The above tHOuGHt pattern may seEm like A pOLeMIC to SomEone. But in aLl HonesTY, that is THe ONLY coURse of action thAt is availabLE to Us. It is An IdeAListic RespoNsE To sOmething verY reaL viz. non-idEal becAUse one oF The most Real faCts In tHe woRLd Is: A noRmAL huMAn WilL Not Rid himseLf OfF poweR if hE HAS Some.

we aRe naTuralLy wired to harnEss And uSE poWer beCause We alL lOve coNtrol. IN contEmPorary parlance, wE all Want to be iNflUeNceRs. we are NOt what mahAtmA Gandhi Is in our EYes Or dUMBlEdore from the Harry POtTER sEries, who Shuns aBSoLuTE power beCaUse He knOWS what PoweR DoEs to us, meRe humaNS.

WHeN I try to ImAgine aN iDeaL InDia, a sOCietY in all Its colouRs—in wHIch everyone is cOMfortable beinG WhO THeY Are—cOmeS to my mind. I sEe a sOCietY in wHIcH thE PolitIcal iDeALs OF fraternity and equalItY have bEen acCepted by our coLlective miND, IN which we Are sO InFOrmed and educatEd thaT we never alLOw communAlistIc designS of sycophANTs to succEed.

i imAgiNe aN iNdIa where everyoNE Has a VoIce, not jUst Because The ConStiTutIoN has given Her a voicE, bUt BeCaUse OtherS Let her spEaK anD eNcoUrage HEr to spEak if She dOeSn’T. in mY India, eVErYONe shOuLd Be abLe tO uSe her VoicE WitHout feaR, especialLy aGAinsT tHoSe who waNt to benefit frOm The differeNcEs oF PeoplE. aN India in Which everyone is an equal pARtner anD doEsn’t hAve tO ‘sell’ his ‘vOicE’ in excHanGE for a pRivileGe, whiCh ShoULD be hiS RIgHt. AN INdia in whicH AN imPosed EqUaliTy has beEn naturalized.

HavinG SaiD that, two major Two IssuES ArE plAGuINg INdIA, boTH Connected and bloCking India’S pROgRess towardS A viSiOnistic Future.

PRobleM 1: centralIzation Of power

One iS oF couRSE: thE centralizAtion of pOwer via a dEVious MEcHanisM, prEvalenT tHroUghouT the woRLd aNd an oPpositIoN which (i must HuMbly accePt) could not offer a solid deFense; tHe citIzeNs of India GavE Too Much power In thE hands of onE peRsoN/partY. ThIS centRaliZAtIon OF poweR
: two people cannot be par tners if t hey a renot  s ocia llyequal if one o f  the m considers herself su perio r. 
Thu s ,my vi sion fo r  I n d iaco nt ain st he  idea  of  a nati on where t her eis no hierar c hy , neithersoc ial nor poli tic al, wh er e p e opleare  notcastig a ted ba sed on th ei r  caste s , or re l i gi on o r ‘otherwise’, wh e re the mind is op en toac c ep t eve ryt hing, live  w ith e v erythin g .T h e a b ove thought p attern mays eem  likeapol e mic to  some on e . B ut in all h ones ty, thatis the only co u rse ofaction  th atis a v ai la ble  t o  us .  I t i s  an  idealis ti crespo nset o s omet hin g ve ry re al viz. non-i dea l be c aus e one  of t he m os t rea l fact s inth e world is: a n orma l human w ill  n otri d him s elf of f p owe r if he  has so m e.
W e a re  naturally wired t oh a rn ess anduse po w er  b e cause we  a lllove c ontro l. I n  c ontempor ary pa r la nc e, we a ll  wantto  be  in fluen c ers.  We ar e not wh at Ma h atma Gandhi is in our eyes o r  D u m bl e dore  fr om the Harr y Po t terseri e s,  wh o  shun s abs ol u te power because he kn ow s what  powe r does to us,  mere huma n s . 

When I  try to imagine an ide al In dia, a soc i ety in a ll it s colour s—in whic h everyone  is  co mfo rta b l ebeing who the y are— co mes tomymind. I  se e a  so cie ty  in which  the pol it ic al  i dea ls of fraterni ty  an dequ ality have b een a ccep te db y o ur coll e ct i v e mi nd ,in w hic hwe ar e so inf ormed a nd educat edt hatwe  n ever al low communali st ic designs  o f s ycopha n t s to suc ceed.

I imagine an Ind i a where  ev eryon e ha s a voice , n ot jus t b e causethe co nstit ut ion h as gi v e nher  a  voice, bu t bec auseot hers  let he r speak and encour a geher to speakifshed o es n’t .  I n  my  I n dia , everyone should  be able t ou se  her voice wit ho ut fear , espec ially against  those wh o want to  b enef i t  fr om the dif ferences  of Peopl e . AnI nd ia in  wh ich ev er yon e isan equ a l p artne r anddo esn’thaveto  ‘sell’his ‘voice’ in exchange  for a  priv ile ge, which  sh o uld  be his r ight . An India  in  wh ich a n i m posed  equ a li tyh as be en n a turalized . 
Hav i n gsaid that,t w o  ma jor t woi ssuesareplaguing India, b o th connected a nd b l o cki ngI ndia ’s  progress towa rds  a v isionist ic  future.

P roblem 1 :C entra lizati on OfPower
O n ei s of c ours e:the centr ali za t ion ofpo we r  via a  dev io us mec hanism ,  pre v a lent throughoutthe w o r ld an d  an  oppo si tion wh i ch ( I must hum bly accept)  could  not  offe r a sol id  defen se;  t he citizen s  of India  gave  too mu ch  pow erin the  han d s  of o ne p er son /party. T h i sc en tr a liz atio n ofpo wer
: two_people cannot_be partners if they_are not_socially_equal if_one_of them considers_herself superior.

Thus, my_vision for India contains_the idea of_a_nation where there is no hierarchy, neither social nor political, where people are not_castigated_based on_their_castes,_or religion or ‘otherwise’, where_the mind is open to_accept everything,_live with everything.

The above thought pattern may seem_like_a polemic to_someone. But in all honesty, that is the only_course of action that is available_to us. It_is_an_idealistic response to something_very real viz. non-ideal because one_of the most real facts in_the world is: a normal human will_not rid himself off power if_he has some.

We are naturally_wired to_harness and use power because_we all love_control. In_contemporary parlance, we_all want to be influencers. We_are not what_Mahatma Gandhi is in our eyes_or_Dumbledore from the_Harry_Potter_series, who_shuns absolute power_because_he knows_what_power does to us, mere humans.

When_I_try to imagine an ideal India, a_society in all its_colours—in_which everyone is comfortable_being who they are—comes to_my mind. I see a society_in which_the political_ideals of fraternity and equality have been accepted by our collective_mind, in which we are so_informed and educated that_we never_allow_communalistic designs of_sycophants_to succeed.

I_imagine an India where everyone has a_voice, not_just because the constitution has given_her a voice, but_because_others let her speak and encourage_her to speak if she doesn’t._In my India, everyone should_be_able_to use her voice without_fear, especially against those who want_to benefit from_the differences of People. An India in_which_everyone is an equal partner and_doesn’t_have to ‘sell’ his ‘voice’ in_exchange_for_a privilege, which should be_his right. An India in which_an imposed equality has been naturalized.

Having said that, two_major two issues_are plaguing India, both connected_and_blocking_India’s progress towards a visionistic future.

Problem 1: Centralization Of Power

One_is of_course: the centralization_of power via a devious mechanism, prevalent throughout the world_and an opposition which (I must humbly_accept) could not offer a solid defense; the citizens of India_gave too much power in the hands of_one person/party. This centralization of power