 death star could be rebuilt, WITHOUT being vulnerable to a cocky young man in an X-wing, therefore we could destroy any planet that the opposition own. I may not know much about Halo, but I am a Star Wars GOD. SUCK ON THAT HALO FANS.
> >
> > Really? Scientific advance in the wars universe?
> >
> >
> >
> > Maybe before the republic. Maybe after the fall of the empire. but not during the time covered and mentioned during the core cannon of the movies. oh, a few improvements are made here and there, but nothing fundamental untill the yuzan vong (spellling?) show up with singularity weapons.
> >
> >
> >
> > the problem is, the republic and empire have a very poor scientific attitude, and a poor understanding of their own technologies, resulting in no ftl improvement, only limited improvements in weaponry, a loss of sheild technologies, a distinct lack of metalurgical insight, and an industrial capacity that spirals into ever larger but weaker ships.
> >
> > last but not least: their computers and targetting scanners have always, and will always leave, much to be desired.
> >
> >
> >
> > 1. General scientific attitude: (poor)
> >
> > “If it isn’t in the archives then it doesn’t exist”-while she _might_ have been refering exclusively to planets and stars, I find that unlikely. If she had been, why wouldn’t she have said “If a STAR isn’t in our archives, then it doesn’t exist”?-unless she believed that EVERYTHING had already been discovered.
> >
> >
> >
> > 2. FTL: (static)
> >
> > Due to the awfull minute in which a certain smuggler treats “parsec” like a unit of time, and a few other factors, it is nearly impossible to directly determine whether FTL gets better, or worse, during the course of the movies.
> >
> >
> >
> > We are thus forced into lesser cannon…most of which says that wars FTL is tied to the force in some fashion, is poorly understood by all engineers, and simply cannot be improved upon, except possibly by a particularly powerfull force-user, generally a Sith or uber
death star could be rebuilt, WITHOUT being vulnerable to a cocky young valet in an ten - wing, therefore we could demolish any planet that the confrontation own. I may not know much about Halo, but I am a Star Wars GOD. fellate ON THAT HALO FANS. 
 > > 
 > > Really? Scientific advance in the war universe? 
 > > 
 > > 
 > > 
 > > Maybe before the republic. possibly after the fall of the empire. but not during the time covered and mention during the core cannon of the movies. oh, a few improvements are made here and there, but nothing cardinal untill the yuzan vong (spellling ?) show up with singularity weapons. 
 > > 
 > > 
 > > 
 > > the problem is, the democracy and empire have a very poor scientific attitude, and a poor agreement of their own technologies, resulting in no ftl improvement, only limited improvements in weaponry, a personnel casualty of sheild technologies, a distinct lack of metalurgical insight, and an industrial capacity that spirals into ever larger but weaker ships. 
 > > 
 > > last but not least: their computers and targetting scanners have always, and will always leave, much to be desire. 
 > > 
 > > 
 > > 
 > > 1. General scientific attitude: (inadequate) 
 > > 
 > > “ If it is n’t in the archive then it does n’t exist”-while she _ might _ have been refer exclusively to planets and stars, I find that unlikely. If she had been, why would n’t she have said “ If a STAR is n’t in our archives, then it suffice n’t exist”?-unless she believed that EVERYTHING had already been discovered. 
 > > 
 > > 
 > > 
 > > 2. FTL: (static) 
 > > 
 > > Due to the awfull minute in which a certain smuggler treats “ parsec ” like a unit of fourth dimension, and a few other factors, it is nearly impossible to directly settle whether FTL gets good, or worse, during the course of the movies. 
 > > 
 > > 
 > > 
 > > We are thus forced into less cannon … most of which says that wars FTL is tie to the violence in some fashion, is poorly understand by all engineers, and just cannot be improved upon, except possibly by a particularly powerfull military unit - user, by and large a Sith or uber
 dewth star could be rebuilu, WITHOUT being volberablx to a docky yojng man in an X-wing, thereforx we coule destroy any planet tfat the oiposition own. U may not know mucm abohb Halm, but I am a Stsr Wars GOG. SUCK ON THAT HXLL FANS.
> >
> > Really? Scientific advance yn the eags universe?
> >
> >
> >
> > Majbq berore the republic. Maybe after the rall of the empire. bit not during the time covfred and mentioned durlng the corg cagbon of the muvies. oh, a few improvejents are made here and there, bjt noching fundanebtap untill the yuzag vong (spellling?) shof up wiyh singularity weeponw.
> >
> >
> >
> > the problem is, vhe republic and empyre have d rery poor scientific qtritudg, and a puir jndtrsvansing ov tieir own tedhnologies, eesulting in no ftl iiitovement, onlg limieeq improvements in weaponry, a loss of shtild fechnologies, a distinct lack of metalurgical insight, wnd an industrial capacity that spirals into ever largxr buu qeakef sjips.
> >
> > last but not least: their computers and fatgvtting scanners hcve always, and wolp sjways leave, moch to ys sesired.
> >
> >
> >
> > 1. Generwl sciegtifix attitudt: (poot)
> >
> > “If it isn’t in the archices then it boewn’t exist”-while she _might_ have beem refrring exclusively to plcnets znd stars, I find thaf unlikely. If she hac teen, why wouldn’t she have faid “If a STAX isn’t iv out archides, then ih doesn’t exist”?-unless she beligved tvat EVERYTJING had already been discoverev.
> >
> >
> >
> > 2. FTL: (ststhc)
> >
> > Due to the swfull minute in which a cettain smuygler greats “paraec” likx a unit of eime, and a fef other factocs, it is gearoy inpossibud to directly cetermine whether FRL gets better, or xorsg, suring the courwe if the movies.
> >
> >
> >
> > De wrv tius fjsced into levser cavmon…mort of which rays that wars FTL is tiad tk the force in somr nashion, iw poorly understood bu all engineers, anf sim'ly cainot br iiproved upon, except possibly bg a partifulwrly powerfujl firce-user, genzrally a Sith or uber
death star could be rebuilt, WITHOUT being a young man an X-wing, therefore that opposition own. I not know much Halo, but I am a Star GOD. SUCK ON THAT HALO FANS. > > > > Really? Scientific advance the wars universe? > > > > > > > > Maybe before republic. after fall the empire. but not during the time covered and mentioned during the core cannon of the oh, a few improvements are made here and but nothing fundamental untill yuzan vong (spellling?) show up singularity > > > > > the problem the republic and empire have a very poor scientific attitude, and a poor understanding of their own resulting in improvement, only improvements weaponry, loss of sheild distinct lack of metalurgical insight, and that spirals into ever larger but weaker ships. > > last but not least: their computers targetting scanners have always, and will always leave, to be desired. > > > > > > > > 1. General scientific attitude: > > > “If isn’t in the then doesn’t she have been exclusively to planets and stars, I find that unlikely. If she been, why wouldn’t she have said “If a STAR isn’t archives, it doesn’t exist”?-unless believed that EVERYTHING had been > > > > > 2. > > to the awfull minute which a certain smuggler treats like a unit of factors, it is nearly impossible to directly determine FTL gets better, or worse, during the of the movies. > > > > > > > > We thus forced cannon…most of which says that wars FTL is to the force in fashion, is poorly understood by all engineers, and simply be upon, except by a particularly force-user, generally a or uber
 death star could be rebuilt, WItHOUT being VulneRabLe tO a CockY youNg man in an X-wing, THereFore we could destroy any pLanet ThAT the OPpOsitiOn own. I mAY nOT KnoW mUcH abOuT haLo, but i am A Star WaRs GOD. SUCK On THaT hALO FANS.
> >
> > RealLY? SCientific aDvaNce in the wars UniVerse?
> >
> >
> >
> > MAyBe bEFore tHe rEpublIc. MaybE After tHe fall of tHe EMpire. bUT not durING tHe tiMe covered and mentiONeD During the core cAnnon oF tHE mOVIes. Oh, a Few improveMeNts arE Made herE AnD THEre, BUt nothing fundAmental untiLL thE yuzan VoNg (sPElllinG?) show Up WIth Singularity WeapOns.
> >
> >
> >
> > the proBlem is, THe repubLIc and emPire haVe a VerY pooR ScIeNtiFiC AttITuDe, aND a pOor underStAnDing oF theIR OWN tecHnoLogiEs, resUlting in no ftl ImpRoveMEnt, Only lImiteD impRoVemenTs in weAponrY, a Loss of sheild tecHnolOgies, a disTinCt LacK oF metaLUrgicaL inSigHt, and an IndustrIAl cApACITy That spirals into eveR lARGeR but weakEr shipS.
> >
> > LaSt BUt not leaSt: TheIr coMPUters And tARgEtting scAnners HAvE aLways, anD wIll alwAyS leAve, Much tO Be deSired.
> >
> >
> >
> > 1. GEneral scIentiFIc attitude: (poor)
> >
> > “iF it isn’t in the aRChIVEs THen iT doEsn’t exist”-whIle sHE _migHt_ haVE bEen REferiNg excLuSIvELy to planets and stars, i fInd thaT unliKely. If she had bEen, why woulDN’T She have sAid “IF A StaR isn’t in our arcHives, Then it doesN’T exist”?-unLess sHe believEd that EVErytHING had AlrEadY beEn dISCoVered.
> >
> >
> >
> > 2. FTL: (statiC)
> >
> > dUe to ThE awfull MinUte in whIch A ceRtaIn sMuGgler treaTs “parsec” LiKe A uNiT of Time, aND a few othEr FacToRs, iT is neARly impOssibLe to DiReCTly DetermiNE wHETher fTl gEts bEttEr, Or worSe, duRIng The courSe of the moVieS.
> >
> >
> >
> > we arE tHuS forced Into lesser canNoN…most of whiCh SayS that wARS FTL is tiEd to the force in some fashiON, is poorLy uNdersTood By all engiNeeRs, and sImpLY cannoT be impRoved UpOn, eXCEpt poSSIbLy bY a ParticularLY PowErfulL fOrce-User, genErally a Sith or uber
 death star could be rebui lt, WITHOU T bei ngvul ne rabl e to  a cocky young manin an X-wing, therefor e weco u ld d e st roy a ny plan e tt h atth eopp os i ti on ow n.I may n ot know mu chab out Halo, bu t  I  am a Star  Wa rs GOD. SUCK  ON  THATHA LOF ANS.> > 
> >Really ?  Scien tific adv an c e in t h e warsu n iv erse ?
> >
> >
> >
> > Ma y be before therepubl ic .  M a y beaft er the fal lof th e  empire .  b u t not during the ti me covereda ndmentio ne d d u ring t he co re can non of themovi es. oh, a  few i m proveme n ts aremade h ere  an d th e re ,but  n o thi n gfun d ame ntal unt il lthe y uzan v o n g (s pel llin g?) s how up with s ing ular i tyweapo ns.
>  >
>  > 
> >> > th e pro bl em is, the repu blic  and empi reha veaveryp oor sc ien tif ic atti tude, a n d a  p o o r  u nderstanding of th ei r ow n techno logies ,  r es u lting in  n o f tl i m p rovem ent, on ly limit ed imp r ov em ents in  w eaponr y,  alos s ofs heil d tech nologies , a d i stinct lack of metalurgicali ns i g ht ,  and  an  industrial  cap a city  tha t  s pir a ls in to ev er la r ger but weaker ship s. 
> >
>  > la st but not le ast: their c o mputersandt ar g etting scanner s hav e always,a nd willalway s leave,  much tob e  desired .
>  >> > 
>> >> 1. Generals c ient if ic atti tud e: (poo r)> > 
>> “ If  it isn’t  in thear ch iv es  th en it doesn’tex ist ”- whi le sh e  _migh t_ ha ve b ee nr efe ring ex c lu s i vely  t oplan ets  a nd st ars, I f ind tha t unlikel y.I f sh eha d been,  why wouldn’t  s he have sa id  “I f a ST A R  isn’t i n our archives, then it doesn’t  ex ist”? -unl ess she b eli eved t hat EVERYT HING h ad al re ady b een d i s co ver ed .
> >
> >> >
>  > 2.  F TL:(static )
> >
> > Due to t h e a wfull minuteinwhic h acer t ai n  sm ug g ler t reats “parsec”like a uni to ftime, anda  fe wother f actors,  it i s  nearly  impossib le to dir ec tlyd e ter mine wheth er FTL g ets bette r , orw or se, d uri ng the  c our se of  the m o vie s.
>>
> >>>
> >We ar ethus for ced into lesser cannon… most o f whi chsays that  wa r s F TL is tie d to  the force  in  so me fa shi o n, is  poo r ly  un d ersto od b y  all engi n ee rs, a nd  simply can n o t  be  impr ove d  upon,  exc ept possibly by a particularly p ower f u llfor c e-us er , generally aSit ho r  uber
 death_star could_be rebuilt, WITHOUT being_vulnerable to_a_cocky young_man_in an X-wing,_therefore we could_destroy any planet that_the opposition own._I_may not know much about Halo, but I am a Star Wars GOD. SUCK_ON_THAT HALO_FANS.
>_>
>_> Really? Scientific advance in_the wars universe?
> >
> >
>_>
> >_Maybe before the republic. Maybe after the fall_of_the empire. but_not during the time covered and mentioned during the_core cannon of the movies. oh,_a few improvements_are_made_here and there, but_nothing fundamental untill the yuzan vong_(spellling?) show up with singularity weapons.
>_>
> >
> >
> > the problem is,_the republic and empire have a_very poor scientific attitude, and_a poor_understanding of their own technologies,_resulting in no_ftl improvement,_only limited improvements_in weaponry, a loss of sheild_technologies, a distinct_lack of metalurgical insight, and an_industrial_capacity that spirals_into_ever_larger but_weaker ships.
> >
>_>_last but_not_least: their computers and targetting scanners_have_always, and will always leave, much to_be desired.
> >
> >
>_>
>_> 1. General scientific_attitude: (poor)
> >
> > “If_it isn’t in the archives then_it doesn’t_exist”-while she__might_ have been refering exclusively to planets and stars, I find_that unlikely. If she had been,_why wouldn’t she have_said “If_a_STAR isn’t in_our_archives, then_it doesn’t exist”?-unless she believed that EVERYTHING_had already_been discovered.
> >
> >
> >
> >_2. FTL: (static)
> >
>_>_Due to the awfull minute in_which a certain smuggler treats “parsec”_like a unit of time,_and_a_few other factors, it is_nearly impossible to directly determine whether_FTL gets better,_or worse, during the course of the_movies.
>_>
> >
> >
> > We are_thus_forced into lesser cannon…most of which_says_that_wars FTL is tied to_the force in some fashion, is_poorly understood by all engineers, and simply cannot be_improved upon, except_possibly by a particularly powerfull_force-user,_generally_a Sith or uber