 want to grow and expand, but are always inefficient and ineffective.

Here are a few examples:

The United States Post Office: the U.S. Postal Service faces a crushing $102 billion debt and benefit liability, with ongoing discussions about reducing days of service to five—even three days.

Veterans Administration Hospitals: patients have died on secret waiting lists. Administrators have not only not been held accountable for this, but have even gotten raises and promotions while people do not receive the care they need on their watch.

Department of Education: states are required to comply with overbearing mandates and regulations in order to receive federal funding, creating more red tape and challenges to educating the next generation.

3. Socialism crushes economic growth.

Economic growth means new jobs are created, incomes go up and new economic and entrepreneurial opportunities boom. But socialism destroys economic growth. Socialism creates redistribution of wealth rather than creating more wealth, innovation and jobs. Socialists think of the economy as a pie, and central planners have to divide up what already exists. In a free economy, the pie gets larger, so that even the poorest become richer.

4. Socialism kills innovation and progress.

Socialism stifles innovation. It retards progress. For example, there’s a new cancer drug that would never have come out if not for free enterprise and the profit motive. Investors and scientists will see as much as $10 billion in sales of this drug. It will make some people rich, and save many lives. These innovations in technology, drugs, and inventions require a free people, not shackled by bureaucracy. Can you imagine a bureaucrat—the DMV, for example—inventing anything? They take, but they don’t create. Socialism doesn’t reward risk and productivity.

5. Socialism discourages entrepreneurship.

While capitalism gives people equal opportunity to thrive and prosper, socialism simply ensures equal results. That means people are robbed of their motivation to start new businesses. Not only that- it potentially robs people of their freedom. As economist and philosopher F.A. Hayek once said, “A claim for equality of material position can be met only by a government with totalitarian powers.”

6. Socialism wastes resources and money.

In a capitalist society, there are harsher penalties for a business that fails- it will run out of resources. But in
want to grow and expand, but are always ineffective and ineffective. 

 Here are a few exemplar: 

 The United States Post Office: the U.S. Postal Service faces a crushing $ 102 billion debt and benefit indebtedness, with ongoing discussions about repress days of serve to five — even three day. 

 Veterans Administration Hospitals: patients have died on secret waiting tilt. Administrators have not only not been hold accountable for this, but have even gotten raises and promotions while citizenry do not receive the care they need on their vigil. 

 Department of Education: states are required to comply with overbearing mandates and regulation in order to receive federal funding, creating more crimson tape and challenges to educating the next generation. 

 3. Socialism crushes economic growth. 

 Economic growth means new jobs are created, incomes go up and new economic and entrepreneurial opportunities boom. But socialism destroys economic increase. Socialism creates redistribution of wealth rather than create more wealth, initiation and jobs. Socialists think of the economy as a pie, and central planners have to separate up what already exists. In a free economy, the pie gets larger, so that even the poorest become rich. 

 4. Socialism kills innovation and progress. 

 Socialism stifles innovation. It retards advancement. For case, there ’s a new cancer drug that would never have come out if not for free enterprise and the profit motif. Investors and scientists will see equally much as $ 10 billion in sales of this drug. It will cause some people rich, and keep open many lives. These invention in technology, drugs, and invention require a complimentary people, not pinion by bureaucracy. Can you imagine a bureaucrat — the DMV, for exercise — inventing anything? They take, but they do n’t create. Socialism does n’t reward risk and productiveness. 

 5. Socialism discourages entrepreneurship. 

 While capitalism gives people adequate opportunity to thrive and prosper, socialism simply ensures equal resultant role. That mean people are robbed of their motivation to begin new businesses. Not entirely that- it potentially robs people of their freedom. As economist and philosopher F.A. Hayek once say, “ A claim for equality of material position can be met only by a government with totalitarian power. ” 

 6. Socialism consume resources and money. 

 In a capitalist society, there are harsher penalties for a business that fails- it will carry out of resources. But in
 wajt to grow and expand, buu are always inefyucient and iheffectixe.

Here are a few examples:

The Ubited States Post Office: thd U.S. Postwl Servixe feces a crushing $102 billion debt zkd beuehit liability, wlth ongoing discussions atojt reducing days of service to five—evqn threr fays.

Veterans Aqminpseratjon Hospitals: patients have died oh secreu waiting lists. Adkinistrators have not only not been held accountwble for thus, btr have even eotten raises and promktions while people do not recekve tke care thei hefg on their xatch.

Dvpartment of Ccucatimn: statrs are requirec tm cimply with overbearinj mandates and regulwtions in oxder to receive federql fundhng, wreagung mode rsd tapf aid challengss to educaring the next generstyin.

3. Socialism drushef qconomic growth.

Economic growth means nef jkbs are created, incomes go up and new economlc and enerepreneurial opportunities boom. But socialism devtroya ecinjouc growth. Socialism creates redistribution of wqzluh gather than creatlng more wealth, inmogayyon and jobs. Rocialnata think of the ecojomy as a piw, and cenural llanners have to divide up qhat already wxists. In a free eeonomy, the pne getx larber, so that even the pouresf become rifher.

4. Socizuism kills innovxtipn and progress.

Socialism stisles innotatiou. It retxrds progrqss. For exwmple, there’s a new canceg druy thad would neger have come out if not for frxx enterprise sng tve profic motiye. Investors anq scientists wnll see cs mucf as $10 billpon in sanes of this drug. It will lake some pemple ricr, ane sace many uives. These inmovations in technooogy, drugs, and invcntiova require a frez keiple, not shackked by blreeucrasf. Can you imdgind a nureajcrat—tht DNX, fot example—inventing atythjng? They take, but yhcy don’t cteate. Socyalism doesn’t reward risk and pgoducvivity.

5. Socislifm discourages entrepreneurshil.

While caoitwlism gives [eopoe equal oppprtunity to thrive and prosper, socialisn simply ensures gqual results. That mecnx people arx robbqd of thehr motivation to staet new businesses. Not only that- it potsntialny rohs people of their freedom. As economist and philosopher F.A. Hayek once saie, “A cleii for equaljty pf manernal posityon rai be met only by s government with totalitarian 'owers.”

6. Sochajism wastes resources and momeh.

In a capitalkst society, there are hadsher pemalties for a business that faiks- it will run out of rexources. Vut ih
want to grow and expand, but are and Here are few examples: The U.S. Service faces a $102 billion debt benefit liability, with ongoing discussions about days of service to five—even three days. Veterans Administration Hospitals: patients have died secret waiting lists. Administrators have not only not been held accountable for this, have gotten and while people do not receive the care they need on their watch. Department of Education: states required to comply with overbearing mandates and regulations order to receive federal creating more red tape and to the next 3. crushes growth. Economic growth new jobs are created, incomes go up and new economic and entrepreneurial opportunities boom. But socialism destroys growth. Socialism of wealth than more innovation and jobs. of the economy as a pie, have to divide up what already exists. In free economy, pie gets larger, so that even poorest become richer. 4. Socialism kills innovation and Socialism stifles innovation. It retards progress. For example, there’s a new cancer drug that would come out if not free enterprise and profit Investors scientists see as as $10 billion in sales of this drug. It will make people rich, and save many lives. These innovations in technology, inventions a free people, shackled by bureaucracy. Can imagine bureaucrat—the DMV, for example—inventing take, they doesn’t risk productivity. 5. Socialism discourages While capitalism gives people equal to thrive and prosper, That means people are robbed of their motivation start new businesses. Not only that- it robs people of their freedom. As economist and philosopher F.A. Hayek once “A claim of material position can be met only by government with totalitarian powers.” Socialism wastes resources and money. In a capitalist society, are penalties for business that fails- will run out resources. But in
 want to grow and expand, but are Always inefFicieNt aNd iNeFfecTive.

here are a few exaMPles:

the United States Post OffIce: thE U.s. postAL SErvicE faces a CRuSHIng $102 BiLlIon DeBT aNd benEfiT liabilIty, with ongOinG dIscussions abOUt Reducing daYs oF service to fiVe—eVen thrEe DayS.

veterAns adminIstratIOn HospItals: patiEnTS have dIEd on secRET wAitiNg lists. AdministraTOrS Have not only not Been heLd ACcOUNtaBle For this, but HaVe eveN Gotten rAIsES ANd pROmotions while People do not REceIve the CaRe tHEy need On theIr WAtcH.

Department Of EdUcation: stAtes arE RequireD To complY with oVerBeaRing MAnDaTes AnD RegULaTioNS in Order to rEcEiVe fedEral FUNDIng, cReaTing More rEd tape and chalLenGes tO EduCatinG the nExt gEnEratiOn.

3. SociAlism CrUshes economic grOwth.

economic gRowTh MeaNs New joBS are crEatEd, iNcomes gO up and nEW ecOnOMIC aNd entrepreneurial oPpORTuNities boOm. But sOCiAlISm destroYs EcoNomiC GRowth. sociALiSm createS redisTRiBuTion of wEaLth ratHeR thAn cReatiNG morE wealtH, innovatIon anD Jobs. Socialists THink of the econOMy AS A pIE, and CenTral plannerS havE To diVide UP wHat ALreadY exisTs. iN a FRee economy, the pie getS lArger, sO that Even the pooresT become ricHER.

4. socialisM kilLS iNNovation and proGress.

socialism sTIfles innOvatiOn. It retaRds progreSS. for exampLe, tHerE’s a New CANcEr drug that wouLD NeveR hAve come Out If not foR frEe eNteRprIsE and the prOfit motiVe. inVeStOrs And scIEntists wIlL seE aS muCh as $10 bILlion iN saleS of tHiS dRUg. IT will maKE sOME peoPlE rIch, aNd sAvE many LiveS. theSe innovAtions in tEchNOlogY, dRuGs, and inVentions requiRe A free peoplE, nOt sHackleD BY bureaucRacy. Can you imagine a bureaUCrat—the dMV, For exAmplE—inventinG anYthing? theY Take, buT they dOn’t crEaTe. SOCIalisM DOeSn’t ReWard risk anD PRodUctivItY.

5. SocIalism dIscourages entrepreNEurShip.

While capiTalIsm gIVEs PeoPLe EQuaL oPPorTUNity to thrive and Prosper, socIaLIsM simply ensURes EqUal resuLts. That Means PEople arE robbed of Their motiVaTion TO StaRt new businEsses. Not Only that- iT PotenTIaLly roBs pEople oF tHeiR freeDom. As eCOnoMist aNd philOsOpher F.a. HayeK oNce said, “A Claim for equality of materIal posItion Can Be met only By a GOveRnment witH totAlitarian pOweRs.”

6. SOcialIsm WAstes ResoURcEs aND moneY.

In a CApitalist SOcIetY, THeRe are harsheR PENalTies fOr a BUsinesS thaT fails- it will run ouT Of resources. But In
 want to grow and expand,but are al waysine ffi ci entandineffective.
H ereare a few examples:

T he Un it e d St a te s Pos t Offic e :t h e U .S .Pos ta l  S ervic e f aces acrushing $ 102  b illion debta nd  benefit l iab ility, withong oing d is cus s ionsabo ut re ducing days o f service  t o  five— e ven thr e e  d ays. 

Veterans Admini s tr a tion Hospitals : pati en t sh a vedie d on secre twaiti n g lists .  A d m i nis t rators have n ot only not bee n held  a cco u ntable  forth i s,but have ev en g otten rai ses an d  promot i ons whi le peo ple  do  not re ce ive  t h e c a re  th e y n eed on t he ir  watc h.
D e p a rtme ntof E ducat ion: states a rerequ i red  to c omply  wit hoverb earing  mand at es and regulati onsin ordertore cei ve  fede r al fun din g,creatin g morer edta p e an d challenges to ed uc a t in g the ne xt gen e ra ti o n.

3. S oc ial ismc r ushes  eco n om ic growt h.

Ec o no mi c growt hmeansne w j obs  arec reat ed, in comes go  up a n d new economic and entrepren e ur i a lo ppor tun ities boom.  But soci alis m  d est r oys e conom ic gr o wth. Socialism crea te s redi strib ution of weal th rathert h a n creati ng m o re wealth, innova tionand jobs.S ocialist s thi nk of th e economy a s a pie,  an d c ent ral p la nners have to d ivid eup what  al ready e xis ts.  In  afr ee econom y, the p ie  g et slar ger,s o that e ve n t he  po orest become  rich er.
4 .S oci alism k i ll s inno va ti on a ndpr ogres s.
S oci alism s tifles in nov a tion .It  retard s progress. F or  example,th ere ’s a n e w  cancerdrug that would never h a ve come  ou t ifnotfor freeent erpris e a n d theprofit  moti ve . I n v estor s an d s ci entists wi l l  se e asmu ch a s $10 b illion in sales of thi s drug. It wi llmake s om e p e op l e r ic h , a n d  save many live s. These i nn o va tions in t e chn ol ogy, dr ugs, an d inv e ntionsrequire a  free peo pl e, n o t  sh ackled bybureaucr acy. Cany ou im a gi ne abur eaucra t— the  DMV,  for e x amp le—in ventin ganythi ng? T he y take,but they don’t create.Social ism d oes n’t rewar d r i skand produ ctiv ity.

5. S oci ali sm di sco u rages  ent r ep ren e urshi p.
W hile capi t al ism g iv es people e q u a l o pport uni t y to t hriv e and prosper, so c ialism simplyensu r e s e qua l  res ul ts. That means  pe op l e  are rob be d of theirmotivati on to st art ne w busi nesses. N ot only t hat-  it  potentia lly  r o bs peop le  o f  their  fre ed om. As  econo m ista n d philosopher F. A. Ha y e k onc e  sa id, “ Aclaim f o r eq uality ofmaterial po sition  can  be m et only  b y a go ver nm ent with t o talitaria n pow ers.”
6.  Soc ial ism wa stes r esour cesan d m oney.

In a  c a pi ta l ist  soc iety,  t here  are hars h er penal tie s  for abu sin e s s that fa i l s- it will  ru n out o f resource s . Bu t  i n 
 want_to grow_and expand, but are_always inefficient_and_ineffective.

Here are_a_few examples:

The United_States Post Office:_the U.S. Postal Service_faces a crushing_$102_billion debt and benefit liability, with ongoing discussions about reducing days of service to_five—even_three days.

Veterans_Administration_Hospitals:_patients have died on secret_waiting lists. Administrators have not_only not_been held accountable for this, but have even_gotten_raises and promotions_while people do not receive the care they need_on their watch.

Department of Education: states_are required to_comply_with_overbearing mandates and regulations_in order to receive federal funding,_creating more red tape and challenges_to educating the next generation.

3. Socialism crushes_economic growth.

Economic growth means new jobs_are created, incomes go up_and new_economic and entrepreneurial opportunities boom._But socialism destroys_economic growth._Socialism creates redistribution_of wealth rather than creating more_wealth, innovation and_jobs. Socialists think of the economy_as_a pie, and_central_planners_have to_divide up what_already_exists. In_a_free economy, the pie gets larger,_so_that even the poorest become richer.

4. Socialism_kills innovation and progress.

Socialism_stifles_innovation. It retards progress._For example, there’s a new_cancer drug that would never have_come out_if not_for free enterprise and the profit motive. Investors and scientists will_see as much as $10 billion_in sales of this_drug. It_will_make some people_rich,_and save_many lives. These innovations in technology, drugs,_and inventions_require a free people, not shackled_by bureaucracy. Can you_imagine_a bureaucrat—the DMV, for example—inventing anything?_They take, but they don’t create._Socialism doesn’t reward risk and_productivity.

5._Socialism_discourages entrepreneurship.

While capitalism gives people_equal opportunity to thrive and prosper,_socialism simply ensures_equal results. That means people are robbed_of_their motivation to start new businesses._Not_only that- it potentially robs people_of_their_freedom. As economist and philosopher_F.A. Hayek once said, “A claim_for equality of material position can be met only_by a government_with totalitarian powers.”

6. Socialism wastes_resources_and_money.

In a capitalist society, there are harsher penalties for a_business that_fails- it will_run out of resources. But in