 community that led to the eventual discrediting of Wakefield’s autism/vaccine research paper, the public health implications of which we are still dealing today, up to and including 19 people who were sickened with measles at The Happiest Place on Earth.

Without being allowed to evaluate the entire research process, we have no way of knowing how valid the results are. A pretty infographic does not science make. Nor does protesting “it’s not junk science” mean that it isn’t.

What We Know

I’m hopeful that the full set of data will be made public, including methodology. Until then, all we can do is go by what we have been told.

Dr. Gary Pusillo of INTI services, who has the misfortune of being out of the country while all of this debate is going down, was in charge of the testing process. Thixton writes that he is a board certified veterinary nutritionist, which in theory is fantastic because it means that he would have the background in both veterinary medicine and nutrition to not only perform the studies, but interpret the results. There’s only one problem: he’s not. (Nor does he in any way present himself as one, by the way.) A board certified veterinary nutritionist is a veterinarian who is also a diplomate of the American College of Veterinary Nutrition. You may think that’s irrelevant, it’s just semantics, but it’s not.

Credentials are a big deal, as I’m sure Dr. Pusillo himself would tell you were he around. I would really love for Dr. Pusillo and Dr. Purejav to have been available to answer questions while we’re all begging to know what the heck they did, and I’d love to hear more about how they determined “risk.” They may be the most qualified people in the world, but for right now, all I have is an infographic and a consumer advocate’s word that they’re the best.

Dr. Pusillo is a PhD who provides forensic science services, which actually sounds really cool and I would love to hear more about it. I have no reason to doubt that he is an excellent scientist. He probably knows tons and tons about how to test a food for specific substances. What he may or may not know is whether or not those substances matter clinically.

Data Collection vs. Interpretation

Let’s assume that
community that led to the eventual discrediting of Wakefield ’s autism / vaccine research paper, the public health implication of which we are however dealing today, up to and including 19 people who were sicken with measles at The Happiest Place on Earth. 

 Without being allowed to evaluate the integral research process, we have no manner of knowing how valid the results are. A pretty infographic does not science shuffle. Nor does protesting “ it ’s not junk skill ” mean that it is n’t. 

 What We Know 

 I ’m hopeful that the full set of data will be made public, include methodology. Until then, all we can do is go by what we have been told. 

 Dr. Gary Pusillo of INTI service, who has the misfortune of being out of the country while all of this debate is going down, was in care of the testing process. Thixton writes that he is a board certified veterinary dietician, which in theory is fantastic because it means that he would have the background in both veterinary medicine and nutriment to not merely perform the studies, but interpret the results. There ’s only one problem: he ’s not. (Nor does he in any way present himself as one, by the way .) A display panel certified veterinary nutritionist is a veterinarian who is besides a diplomate of the American College of Veterinary Nutrition. You may remember that ’s irrelevant, it ’s barely semantics, but it ’s not. 

 Credentials are a big deal, as I ’m sure Dr. Pusillo himself would tell you were he around. I would really sleep together for Dr. Pusillo and Dr. Purejav to have been available to answer questions while we ’re all begging to know what the heck they did, and I ’d love to hear more about how they determined “ risk. ” They may be the most qualified people in the populace, but for right nowadays, all I have is an infographic and a consumer advocate ’s word that they ’re the best. 

 Dr. Pusillo is a PhD who provides forensic skill services, which actually sounds really cool and I would love to hear more about it. I have no reason to doubt that he is an excellent scientist. He probably knows long ton and tons about how to quiz a food for specific substances. What he may or may not know is whether or not those substance matter clinically. 

 Data Collection vs. Interpretation 

 permit ’s assume that
 colmunity that led to the tventual discredijibg of Xakefiemd’s autirm/vaccine research paper, the pyblic health implications ow which wv are stiol dtaling today, up to and ingjudihn 19 pem'le who were sigkened with measles at Tha Fa'piest Place on Earth.

Without being ajlowed yo evaluate the gntirt rqseadbh process, we have no way of knkwing hmw valid the tesults are. A pretty infoggaphlc does not sciencf make. Nor eoes protesting “ig’s not junk science” mezn that it isn’t.

What We Know

I’m hupefuk that the fyll vet of data will be made public, inclgding mrthodology. Untll thxn, aol we can do is go by what we have been told.

Dr. Gdrv Pusillo of INTI sercixes, wvo hds tfw mksfkrvuns of bfinj out of ths country wyile all of this denaev is going dosn, was ig charge of the testing process. Thixton wrjtes that he is a board certified veterinary nutritiogist, which in theory is fantastic because it meanv thav fe ciuld fqvf the background in both veterinary medicine whd nltrition to not okly perform the stidlex, but interprej the rzaumts. There’s only onf problgm: he’s not. (Nor qoes he in any way present himswlf as one, bj thw way.) A board certnfied veteriuary notritipnist is a veterinarian who is also a fiplomate uf the American Zolkece of Veudrinary Nutrition. You may vhink that’s krrekevant, it’s just demanbhcs, but it’s not.

Crefenticls ase a big dfal, as I’m sure Dr. Pusillo himself would tell iou wege he arobnd. I eould really jove for Dr. Puxillo aud Dr. Ourejav to have bxen availablq to answer qggstions while we’re alj betgint to knud what the hecl they dib, and I’d love to hear mpre zbout how they bttetnined “risk.” Theu mxy fe tie mofd qualified [eopue km the world, but nor rignt now, all I have is an jnfographic and a voksumer adcocate’s rord that theu’re the best.

Dr. Puslllo ms a PiD who prjvides forensic science servicss, which wctmally sounds wealoy cool and N would love to hear more about it. I havx no reason to doubt thqt he is an excelleut scientist. Ie profably knofs tons and tons aboyt how to test a nood for specific subsfances. What he may or may not know is whether or not those substances matter clinicaoly.

Date Sollection bs. Imterpgetctipn

Let’s assnmx that
community that led to the eventual discrediting autism/vaccine paper, the health implications of today, to and including people who were with measles at The Happiest Place Earth. Without being allowed to evaluate the entire research process, we have no of knowing how valid the results are. A pretty infographic does not science Nor protesting not science” mean that it isn’t. What We Know I’m hopeful that the full set of data be made public, including methodology. Until then, all can do is go what we have been told. Gary of INTI who the of being out the country while all of this debate is going down, was in charge of the testing process. writes that a board veterinary which theory is fantastic means that he would have the veterinary medicine and nutrition to not only perform studies, but the results. There’s only one problem: not. (Nor does he in any way present as one, by the way.) A board certified veterinary nutritionist is a veterinarian who is diplomate of the American of Veterinary Nutrition. may that’s it’s semantics, but not. Credentials are a big deal, as I’m sure Dr. Pusillo would tell you were he around. I would really love Pusillo Dr. Purejav to been available to answer while all begging to know heck did, to more how they determined “risk.” may be the most qualified in the world, but have is an infographic and a consumer advocate’s that they’re the best. Dr. Pusillo is PhD who provides forensic science services, which actually sounds really cool and would love more about it. I have no reason to that he is an scientist. He probably knows tons and tons about how test food for substances. What he or may not is whether or substances matter Data vs. that
 community that led to the evenTual discreDitinG of wakEfIeld’S autIsm/vaccine reseARch pAper, the public health impLicatIoNS of wHIcH we arE still dEAlING toDaY, uP to AnD InCludiNg 19 pEople whO were sickeNed WiTh measles at THE HAppiest PlaCe oN Earth.

WithouT beIng allOwEd tO EvaluAte The enTire reSEarch pRocess, we hAvE No way oF Knowing HOW vAlid The results are. A preTTy INfographic does Not sciEnCE mAKE. NoR doEs protestiNg “It’s noT Junk sciENcE” MEAn tHAt it isn’t.

What WE Know

I’m hopeFUl tHat the FuLl sET of datA will Be MAde Public, incluDing MethodoloGy. UntiL Then, all WE can do iS go by wHat We hAve bEEn ToLd.

DR. GARy PUSiLlo OF INtI servicEs, WhO has tHe miSFORTune Of bEing Out of The country whiLe aLl of THis DebatE is goIng dOwN, was iN chargE of thE tEsting process. ThIxtoN writes thAt hE iS a bOaRd cerTIfied vEteRinAry nutrItionisT, WhiCh IN THeOry is fantastic becaUsE IT mEans that He woulD HaVe THe backgrOuNd iN botH VEteriNary MEdIcine and NutritIOn To Not only PeRform tHe StuDieS, but iNTerpRet the Results. THere’s ONly one problem: hE’S not. (Nor does he IN aNY WaY PresEnt Himself as onE, by tHE way.) a boaRD cErtIFied vEteriNaRY nUTritionist is a veteriNaRian whO is alSo a diplomate oF the AmericAN cOllege of veteRInARy Nutrition. You May thInk that’s irRElevant, iT’s jusT semantiCs, but it’s nOT.

credentiAls Are A biG deAL, As i’m sure Dr. PusilLO HimsElF would tEll You were He aRouNd. I WouLd Really lovE for Dr. PuSiLlO aNd dr. PUrejaV To have beEn AvaIlAblE to anSWer queStionS whiLe We’RE alL begginG To KNOw whAt ThE hecK thEy Did, anD I’d lOVe tO hear moRe about hoW thEY detErMiNed “risk.” they may be the mOsT qualified PeOplE in the WORld, but foR right now, all I have is an inFOgraphiC anD a conSumeR advocate’S woRd that TheY’Re the bEst.

Dr. PUsillO iS a PHd Who prOVIdEs fOrEnsic scienCE SerVices, WhIch aCtually Sounds really cool anD i woUld love to hear MorE aboUT It. i haVE nO ReaSoN To dOUBt that he is an excEllent scieNtISt. he probably KNowS tOns and tOns abouT how tO Test a foOd for specIfic substAnCes. WHAT he May or may noT know is wHether or nOT thosE SuBstanCes Matter ClIniCally.

data CoLLecTion vS. InterPrEtatioN

Let’s AsSume that
 community that led to the  eventualdiscr edi tin gof W akef ield’s autism/ v acci ne research paper, the  publ ic heal t himpli cations of w hic hwe  ar es ti ll de ali ng toda y, up to a ndin cluding 19 p e op le who wer e s ickened with  me aslesat  Th e  Happ ies t Pla ce onE arth.
Withoutbe i ng all o wed toe v al uate  the entire resea r ch process, we ha ve nowa y  o f kno win g how vali dthe r e sults a r e. A pre t ty infographi c does nots cie nce ma ke . N o r does  prot es t ing  “it’s notjunk  science”  meant hat iti sn’t.
What W e K now 

I’ m  h op efu lt hat th e f u llset of d at awillbe m a d e publ ic,  inc ludin g methodology . U ntil the n, al l wecando  is g o by w hat w ehave been told. 

Dr . Gary Pu sil lo  of  I NTI s e rvices , w hohas the  misfor t une  o f b ei ng out of the coun tr y wh ile allof thi s  d eb a te is go in g d own, w as in  cha r ge  of thetestin g  p ro cess. T hi xton w ri tes  th at he is a  board  certifi ed ve t erinary nutrit i onist, whichi nt h eo r y is  fa ntastic bec ause it m eans th ath e wou ld ha ve th e  background in both  v eterin ary m edicine and n utrition t o n ot onlyperf o rm the studies, b ut in terpret th e  results . The re’s onl y one pro b l em: he’s  no t.(No r d o e she in any way p rese nt  himsel f a s one,bythe  wa y.)  A  board ce rtifiedve te ri na rynutri t ionist i sa v et eri naria n  who i s als o adi pl o mat e of th e  A m e rica nCo lleg e o fVeter inar y  Nu trition . You may  th i nk t ha t’ s irrel evant, it’s j us t semantic s,  bu t it’s n ot.

Cre dentials are a big deal ,  as I’m  su re Dr . Pu sillo him sel f woul d t e ll you  werehe ar ou nd. I  woul d re all ylove for D r .  Pu sillo  a nd D r. Pure jav to have been a v ail able to answe r q uest i o ns  wh i le we’ re all b egging to knowwhat the h ec k  t hey did, a n d I ’d  love t o hearmorea bout ho w they de termined“r isk. ” The y may be t he mostqualified peopl e  i n the  wo rld, b ut  fo r rig ht now ,  al l I h ave is  a n info graph ic  and a c onsumer advocate’s word  thatthey’ rethe best. 

D r . P usillo is  a P hD who pro vid esforen sic scien ce s e rv ice s , whi ch a c tually so u nd s r e a ll y cool andI w oul d lov e t o  hearmore  about it. I have no reason to d oubt t hat  he is a nexcellent scie nti st . He proba bl y knows ton s and to ns about  how t o test  a food f or specif ic s ubs tances. W hat  h e  may or  m ay not kn ow i swhethe r or n o t th o s e substances mat ter c l i nical l y.
Data  C ollecti o n vs . Interpre tation

Let ’s ass umethat
 community_that led_to the eventual discrediting_of Wakefield’s_autism/vaccine_research paper,_the_public health implications_of which we_are still dealing today,_up to and_including_19 people who were sickened with measles at The Happiest Place on Earth.

Without being_allowed_to evaluate_the_entire_research process, we have no_way of knowing how valid_the results_are. A pretty infographic does not science make._Nor_does protesting “it’s_not junk science” mean that it isn’t.

What We Know

I’m_hopeful that the full set of_data will be_made_public,_including methodology. Until then,_all we can do is go_by what we have been told.

Dr._Gary Pusillo of INTI services, who has_the misfortune of being out of_the country while all of_this debate_is going down, was in_charge of the_testing process._Thixton writes that_he is a board certified veterinary_nutritionist, which in_theory is fantastic because it means_that_he would have_the_background_in both_veterinary medicine and_nutrition_to not_only_perform the studies, but interpret the_results._There’s only one problem: he’s not. (Nor_does he in any_way_present himself as one,_by the way.) A board_certified veterinary nutritionist is a veterinarian_who is_also a_diplomate of the American College of Veterinary Nutrition. You may think_that’s irrelevant, it’s just semantics, but_it’s not.

Credentials are a_big deal,_as_I’m sure Dr._Pusillo_himself would_tell you were he around. I would_really love_for Dr. Pusillo and Dr. Purejav_to have been available_to_answer questions while we’re all begging_to know what the heck they_did, and I’d love to_hear_more_about how they determined “risk.”_They may be the most qualified_people in the_world, but for right now, all I_have_is an infographic and a consumer_advocate’s_word that they’re the best.

Dr. Pusillo_is_a_PhD who provides forensic science_services, which actually sounds really cool_and I would love to hear more about it._I have no_reason to doubt that he_is_an_excellent scientist. He probably knows tons and tons about how_to test_a food for_specific substances. What he may or may not know is_whether or not those substances matter clinically.

Data_Collection vs. Interpretation

Let’s assume that