, New York according to a notice issued by the
EPA on January 9, 1990. Pennsylvania House and
Kittinger were operated as a single entity during the
late 1980's. Both Pennsylvania House and Kittinger
shipped hazardous materials to the site during the
period in question, which materials were to be properly
disposed of by an independent contractor. Pennsylvania
House and Kittinger are represented on the PRP Steering
Committee. The EPA and the PRPs have entered into a
consent order and the removal action under the
supervision of the EPA has been substantially completed
pursuant to the order. Pennsylvania House's de minimis
involvement in this stage of the matter has been
settled. The Company remains involved on behalf of
Kittinger and Pennsylvania House as to possible future
remedial action not covered by the de minimis
settlement. The final allocation financial
responsibility for the initial phase of the clean up
within the PRP group has been decided with the
allocation for Kittinger determined to be approximately
$2,100. Removal activities are substantially complete
at the site, but it is not known at this time if the
EPA or NYDEC will require further remediation.
(v) The NYDEC has notified the PRP Group for the
Envirotek II matter of an investigation of the Roblin
Steel complex within which the Envirotek II site is
located. The second PRP group, made up primarily of
PRPs in Envirotek II, including Pennsylvania House and
Kittinger, has been formed to respond. It is
anticipated that the Roblin Steel PRP group will
undertake a limited remedial investigation in an effort
to demonstrate there is relatively limited impact on
the overall site as a result of conditions at Envirotek
II.
(vi) The EPA has alleged that the operators at the
Envirotek II site transported waste to the second site,
known as Envirotek I. A PRP group, including Kittinger
and Pennsylvania House, has been formed and is
preparing a response for the EPA.
(vii) The EPA is currently investigating a
site at York Haven, York County, Pennsylvania. A PRP
group has organized to respond to the EPA,
-12-
and Pennsylvania House has been identified by the PRP group

, New York according to a notice issued by the 
 EPA on January 9, 1990. Pennsylvania House and 
 Kittinger were operated as a individual entity during the 
 belated 1980's. Both Pennsylvania House and Kittinger 
 shipped hazardous materials to the site during the 
 menstruation in question, which materials were to be by rights 
 disposed of by an independent contractor. Pennsylvania 
 House and Kittinger are represent on the PRP Steering 
 Committee. The EPA and the PRPs have entered into a 
 consent order and the removal legal action under the 
 supervision of the EPA has been substantially completed 
 pursuant to the club. Pennsylvania House's de minimis 
 involvement in this stagecoach of the matter has been 
 settled. The caller remains involved on behalf of 
 Kittinger and Pennsylvania House as to possible future 
 curative action not covered by the de minimis 
 colony. The final allotment financial 
 responsibility for the initial phase of the clean up 
 within the PRP group has been decided with the 
 allocation for Kittinger settle to be approximately 
 $ 2,100. Removal activities are substantially complete 
 at the site, but it is not known at this time if the 
 EPA or NYDEC will require further remediation. 
 (v) The NYDEC has notified the PRP Group for the 
 Envirotek II matter of an investigation of the Roblin 
 Steel complex within which the Envirotek II site is 
 located. The second PRP group, made up primarily of 
 PRPs in Envirotek II, including Pennsylvania House and 
 Kittinger, has been form to respond. It is 
 anticipated that the Roblin Steel PRP group will 
 contract a circumscribed remedial investigation in an effort 
 to demonstrate there constitute relatively limited impact on 
 the overall site as a result of condition at Envirotek 
 II. 
 (vi) The EPA has alleged that the operators at the 
 Envirotek II site transported waste to the second site, 
 know as Envirotek I. A PRP group, including Kittinger 
 and Pennsylvania House, has been formed and is 
 preparing a response for the EPA. 
 (vii) The EPA is currently investigating a 
 web site at York Haven, York County, Pennsylvania. A PRP 
 group has form to respond to the EPA, 
 -12- 
 and Pennsylvania House has been identified by the PRP group
, Nea York according to a nouice issued by thg
EPA on Oanuary 9, 1990. Pennshlvania House and
Kittinger wxre iperauvd as a single entity during tje
late 1980's. Boti Pennsylvania House and Kittihner
shnp'ed hazardous msterials tm the site durhne che
period in question, which materialf were yo be properly
difpostd jf bg an independent contractor. Pennsymvania
Hmuse and Kittonger are represented on tje PGP Steering
Committfe. The EPA qnd eye PRPs have entered into a
consent order and the removal action uvder che
supervisuob ov the EPA haw beeg substantially compneted
putsuant to the prdxr. Pwnnsylvania House's de minimis
involvemenj in this vtcge of the matter has bwen
sejtled. The Xomoang cemzins ijvomved on begalf of
Kittunger and Pennsylvamiw House as to lossibje future
remedial action not covered by tve se minimis
settlement. Thw final allocation fijancial
refponsibility for the initial phase of the clean u[
withmn tht IVP gfiuo has been decided with the
allocation for Kitejnbeg determined to bc approximately
$2,100. Rekogak activities ate subscznfially complete
at hhe sitg, but ut is not knoen at this time if the
EPA oe NYDEC will eequire further relediation.
(v) Che NYCEC hss notified the PRP Grobp for the
Envirotfk II matfdr of an investieatpon mf the Roblin
Steel complex within wiich che Envifotel II syte is
locahed. Tma second PRP group, made u[ primarilj of
PRPs in Envirotek II, includmig Pennsylvanoa Holse and
Kictingev, has been formqd to respond. Nt is
antncipatdd that thv Roblin Vteel PRP gwoup will
undesjake a limitev remediaj incestugation kn an effort
to demonstrcue there iw relatively limitcd imkadt on
the overalo sute as a result of cogdptipnf at Enviroten
II.
(vk) Tfr EPA has allegeb ghat the operators at tha
Envjrotek II site tramsiorted wawte to tre second sitr,
known as Enviroten I. A PR' groul, igcluding Kittinger
and Pennsylvznia Housf, hws been formqd akd if
preparing a response for the EPA.
(vii) The EPA is cnrrently investigating q
site at York Haven, Nork County, 'ennsyjvania. A [RP
group has organizwd to respond to uhe EPA,
-12-
and Pennsylvania House has heen identified by the PRP group

, New York according to a notice the on January 1990. Pennsylvania House a entity during the 1980's. Both Pennsylvania and Kittinger shipped hazardous materials to site during the period in question, which materials were to be properly disposed by an independent contractor. Pennsylvania House and Kittinger are represented on the PRP Committee. EPA the have entered into a consent order and the removal action under the supervision of the EPA been substantially completed pursuant to the order. Pennsylvania de minimis involvement in stage of the matter has settled. Company remains on of and Pennsylvania House to possible future remedial action not covered by the de minimis settlement. The final allocation financial responsibility the initial the clean within PRP has been decided allocation for Kittinger determined to be activities are substantially complete at the site, but is not at this time if the EPA NYDEC will require further remediation. (v) The NYDEC notified the PRP Group for the Envirotek II matter of an investigation of the Roblin within which the Envirotek site is located. second group, up of PRPs Envirotek II, including Pennsylvania House and Kittinger, has been formed to It is anticipated that the Roblin Steel PRP group will limited investigation in an to demonstrate there is limited on the overall site result conditions (vi) EPA alleged that the operators the Envirotek II site transported to the second site, PRP group, including Kittinger and Pennsylvania House, has formed and is preparing a response for EPA. (vii) The EPA is currently investigating a site at York Haven, County, Pennsylvania. group has organized to respond to the EPA, and Pennsylvania House has identified by the PRP group
, New York according to a notice Issued by thE
EPA oN JaNuaRy 9, 1990. pennSylvAnia House and
KiTTingEr were operated as a singlE entiTy DUrinG ThE
late 1980'S. Both PeNNsYLVanIa hoUse AnD kiTtingEr
sHipped hAzardous maTerIaLs to the site dURiNg the
perioD in Question, whicH maTerialS wEre TO be prOpeRly
diSposed OF by an iNdependenT cONtractOR. PennsyLVAnIa
HoUse and Kittinger arE RePResented on the PrP SteeRiNG
COMMitTee. the EPA and tHe pRPs hAVe enterED iNTO A
coNSent order and tHe removal acTIon Under tHe
SupERvisioN of thE Epa haS been substaNtiaLly compleTed
purSUant to tHE order. PEnnsylVanIa HOuse'S De MiNimIs
INvoLVeMenT In tHis stage Of ThE mattEr haS BEEN
setTleD. The compaNy remains invoLveD on bEHalF of
KiTtingEr anD PEnnsyLvania house As To possible futurE
remEdial actiOn nOt CovErEd by tHE de minImiS
seTtlemenT. The finAL alLoCATIoN financial
responsiBiLITy For the inItial pHAsE oF The clean Up
WitHin tHE pRP grOup hAS bEen decidEd with THe
AlLocatioN fOr KittInGer DetErminED to bE approXimately
$2,100. removAL activities are SUbstantially cOMpLETe
AT the SitE, but it is not KnowN At thIs tiME iF thE
ePA or nYDEC WiLL rEQuire further remediaTiOn.
(v) The nYDEC Has notified thE PRP Group fOR THe
EnviroTek Ii MaTTer of an investiGatioN of the RoblIN
Steel coMplex Within whIch the EnvIROtek II siTe iS
loCatEd. THE SeCond PRP group, mADE up pRiMarily oF
PRps in EnvIroTek iI, iNclUdIng PennsyLvania HoUsE aNd
kiTtiNger, hAS been forMeD to ReSpoNd. It iS
AnticiPated That ThE ROBliN Steel Prp gROUp wiLl
UnDertAke A lImiteD remEDiaL investIgation in An eFFort
To DeMonstraTe there is relaTiVely limiteD iMpaCt on
thE OVerall siTe as a result of conditions AT EnviroTek
iI.
(vi) THe EPa has allegEd tHat the OpeRAtors aT the
EnVirotEk iI sITE tranSPOrTed WaSte to the seCONd sIte,
knOwN as ENviroteK I. A PRP group, includiNG KiTtinger
and PenNsyLvanIA hoUse, HAs BEen FoRMed AND is
preparing a reSponse for tHe epA.
(Vii) The EPA iS CurReNtly invEstigatIng a
sITe at YorK Haven, YorK County, PeNnSylvANIa. A pRP
group haS organizEd to respoND to thE ePa,
-12-
and PEnnSylvanIa houSe has Been idENtiFied bY the PRp gRoup

, New York according to anotice iss ued b y t heEP A on  Jan uary 9, 1990.P enns ylvania House and
Kitt inger  w e re o p er atedas a si n gl e ent it ydur in g  t he
la te1980's.  Both Penn syl va nia House an d  K ittinger
s hip ped hazardou s m ateria ls  to the s ite  duri ng the period  in quest io n , whic h  materi a l swere  to be properly
d i sp o sed of by an i ndepen de n tc o ntr act or. Pennsy lv aniaH ouse an d  K i t t ing e r are represe nted on the PRP  Steer in g
C o mmitte e. Th eE PAand the PRP s ha ve entere d into a
conse n t order  and t herem oval ac ti onun d ert he 
su p erv ision of  t he  EPAhasb e e n  sub sta ntia lly c ompleted
purs uan t to the  orde r. Pe nnsy lv aniaHouse' s demi nimis
involveme nt i n this st age  o f t he  matt e r hasbee n
s ettled.  The Co m pan yr e m ai ns involved on beh al f of 
Kitting er and Pe nn s ylvaniaHo use  ast o  poss ible fu ture
rem ediala ct io n not c ov ered b ythe  de  mini m is
s ettlem ent. The  fina l  allocation fi n ancial
respon s ib i l it y  for  th e initial p hase of t he c l ea n u p 
with in th eP RP group has been deci de d with  theallocation fo r Kittinge r d etermine d to be approximately$2,10 0. Removal activiti es ar e substa ntially c o m plete
at  th e s ite , b u t  i t is not know n at t hi s timeifthe
EPA  or  NY DEC  wi ll  requirefurtherre me di at ion .
(v) The NYDE Chas  n oti fiedt he PRP  Grou p fo rth e 
En virotek II m atte rof  aninv es tigat iono f t he Robl in
Steelcom p lexwi th in whic h the Envirot ek  II site i sloc ated.T h e second  PRP group, made up pri m arily o f
P RPs i n En virotek I I,includ ing Pennsy lvania  Hous eand K ittin g e r,  ha sbeen forme d torespo nd . It  is
ant icipated that theR obl in Steel PRPgro up w i l lund e rt a keal imi t e d remedial inve stigationin an  effort
to dem on stratethere i s rel a tivelylimited i mpact onth e ov e r all  site as a  resultof condit i ons a t  E nviro tek 
II.
( vi ) T he EP A hasa lle ged t hat th eoperat ors a tthe
Envi rotek II site transport ed was te to  th e secondsit e ,
k nown as E nvir otek I. APRP  gr oup,inc l uding  Kit t in ger and P enns y lvania Ho u se , h a s  b een formeda n d  is 
prep ari n g a re spon se for the EPA.
( v ii) The EPA is  cur r e ntl y i n vest ig ating a
site a t Y or k Haven, Y or k County, P ennsylva ni a . A P RP
gro up has  organi z e dt o resp ondtothe EPA,-12 -a nd Penn sy lv a nia Ho useha s been  ident i fied b y the PRP group
, New_York according_to a notice issued_by the
EPA_on_January 9,_1990._Pennsylvania House and
Kittinger_were operated as_a single entity during_the
late 1980's. Both_Pennsylvania_House and Kittinger
shipped hazardous materials to the site during the
period in question, which materials_were_to be_properly
disposed_of_by an independent contractor. Pennsylvania
House_and Kittinger are represented on_the PRP_Steering
Committee. The EPA and the PRPs have entered_into_a
consent order and_the removal action under the
supervision of the EPA has_been substantially completed
pursuant to the order._Pennsylvania House's de_minimis
involvement_in_this stage of the_matter has been
settled. The Company remains_involved on behalf of
Kittinger and Pennsylvania_House as to possible future
remedial action not_covered by the de minimis
settlement. The_final allocation financial
responsibility for the_initial phase_of the clean up
within the_PRP group has_been decided_with the
allocation for_Kittinger determined to be approximately
$2,100. Removal_activities are substantially_complete
at the site, but it is_not_known at this_time_if_the
EPA or_NYDEC will require_further_remediation.
(v) The_NYDEC_has notified the PRP Group for_the
Envirotek_II matter of an investigation of the_Roblin
Steel complex within which_the_Envirotek II site is
located._The second PRP group, made_up primarily of
PRPs in Envirotek II,_including Pennsylvania_House and
Kittinger,_has been formed to respond. It is
anticipated that the Roblin Steel_PRP group will
undertake a limited remedial_investigation in an effort
to_demonstrate there_is_relatively limited impact_on
the_overall site_as a result of conditions at Envirotek
II.
(vi)_The EPA_has alleged that the operators at_the
Envirotek II site transported_waste_to the second site,
known as Envirotek_I. A PRP group, including Kittinger
and_Pennsylvania House, has been formed_and_is
preparing_a response for the EPA.
(vii)_The EPA is currently investigating a
site_at York Haven,_York County, Pennsylvania. A PRP
group has organized_to_respond to the EPA,
-12-
and Pennsylvania House_has_been identified by the PRP group
