 and International Cooperation (NCSC) recently asked WRI to coordinate think tanks and other advocates — including those identified by China — “stem[ming] from the recognition that this Administration is coming to an end soonish and their desire to open up channels in DC that are additional to the ones that are working well now.” Morgan sought the Obama State Department’s assistance and, records show, was met with an enthusiastic response, with State suggesting they immediately arrange a call for their respective “China teams to talk”.

In other records, State officials engaged in a discussion thread, “Subject: Jennifer Morgan”, which it is implausibly withholding in its entirety as b5, “deliberative process”. Like other records many directly relating to Paris and its circumvention of the U.S. Constitution’s Article II, Section 2 for “advice and consent” of all treaties, this is plainly designed to delay and obstruct public awareness of State’s activities.

State did not even acknowledge the requests at issue in today’s suit, let alone demonstrate by the legal deadline that it is processing them. Overtures to determine whether State would alter its ongoing obstruction met no favorable response. As such E&E Legal is forced yet again to sue to obtain public records, which on their face appear highly relevant to the ongoing public debate about the federal government’s role in what has become a “global warming” industry, and coordination with that movement’s leading activists as well as with other countries which seek the U.S. to adopt the agenda’s harmful policies.

These records are of even greater public interest given recent reports of parties having derailed President Trump’s promise to “cancel” the purported U.S. agreement to the December 2015 Paris climate treaty, which he had unambiguously declared was “bad for US business” and allows “foreign bureaucrats control over how much energy we use”.

It is unclear whether the new administration intends to continue the Obama administration’s clampdown on politically embarrassing but nonetheless public information, or if this failure to correct course is the result of holdovers from the prior administration, who also are behind abusive withholdings in E&E Legal’s other suit against State for similar documents. The latter include redactions of Obama officials joking about how foreign diplomats made clear the U.S. would have to buy others’ participation in a Paris climate treaty, withholding correspondence with lobbyists pursuing the climate agenda as internal deliberative, and even redacting a Rolling
and International Cooperation (NCSC) recently asked WRI to coordinate think tanks and other advocate — include those identified by China — “ stem[ming ] from the recognition that this Administration is coming to an conclusion soonish and their desire to open up channels in DC that are extra to the ones that are working well now. ” Morgan seek the Obama State Department ’s assistance and, records appearance, was met with an enthusiastic response, with State suggest they immediately arrange a call for their respective “ China teams to talk ”. 

 In other records, state of matter officials engaged in a discussion thread, “ national: Jennifer Morgan ”, which it is implausibly withholding in its entirety as b5, “ deliberative process ”. Like early records many immediately relating to Paris and its circumvention of the U.S. Constitution ’s Article II, Section 2 for “ advice and consent ” of all treaties, this is plainly design to delay and obstruct public awareness of State ’s activities. 

 State did not even acknowledge the requests at issue in today ’s lawsuit, let alone demonstrate by the legal deadline that it is processing them. Overtures to determine whether State would alter its ongoing obstruction met no favorable reaction. As such E&E Legal is forced yet again to action to receive public criminal record, which on their face appear highly relevant to the ongoing public argument about the federal politics ’s role in what has become a “ global warming ” diligence, and coordination with that movement ’s leading activists as well as with other countries which try the U.S. to adopt the agenda ’s harmful policies. 

 These records are of even greater public sake given late reputation of parties having derailed President Trump ’s promise to “ cancel ” the purported U.S. agreement to the December 2015 Paris climate treaty, which he had uniquely declared was “ bad for US business ” and allows “ foreign bureaucrats control over how much energy we use ”. 

 It is indecipherable whether the new government intends to continue the Obama presidency ’s clampdown on politically embarrassing but however public information, or if this failure to correct course is the resultant role of holdovers from the prior government, who also are behind abusive withholding in E&E Legal ’s other courtship against State for similar documents. The latter include redactions of Obama officials joke about how foreign diplomats make clear the U.S. would have to bribe others ’ participation in a Paris climate treaty, withholding correspondence with lobbyists pursuing the climate agenda as internal deliberative, and even redacting a Rolling
 anf International Cooperatlon (NCSC) recentli qsked XRI to doordinage think tanks and other advlcqtes — including those identkfied by Bhina — “stwm[miig] from the recojhition bkat tgls Adkmnistration is goming to at end soonish dna cheir desire to open up channels in QC that age additional jo tht oges fhat are working well now.” Morgan skught tie Obama State Cepartment’s assistance and, reclrds show, was met aith an entyusiwwtic responsd, with Staue suggestinf they immediately arrange a caul fox their reskzxtigg “China teamw to nalk”.

In other vvcords, Vtate ogficials engagcd in a eiscussion thread, “Suboect: Jennifer Morgan”, which it ia implausibly wityhildinc in its wntkreuy es g5, “deliheretive proceas”. Like othwr records many dirtctjj relating to Paris agd its circumvention of the U.S. Constituuion’s Article II, Section 2 foe “advice and consent” lf all trqaties, this is plainly designed to delay and obstsuct 'uclie awardbeds of State’s activities.

State did not even ackgkwkecge the requesbs at issue in todsy’d xoit, let alone aemonscdafe by the legal dewdline jhat ir is proctssinb them. Overtures to determibe whether Snate would alter its ougoing obstrbction met mo favorable response. Ar sudh E&E Legal is forces yet again to sud tp mbtain public records, whicr on theic facz appear hignly rejevant to hhe okcoing public debatf aboot the federal glvernment’s role in what has become a “global wsrkinc” industxy, and coordination with that movgment’s lecding xctivists zs well as with otrer countries ahich seek tie U.S. to wdopr thw agendx’r harmful polivies.

These records aee of even greater pucmic interest girtn twcent reports pf oareivs iavind derailed Prasiddnt Yrump’r promise ti “canvel” the purported U.S. agrsement to the Decekbcr 2015 Paris climate treaty, which he had unambiguoudly dxclarev was “nad for US business” and allows “fodeign burfaugrats control ovev hor much enexgy we use”.

It is unclear whether the new edministration intends ro continue the Obaks administretion’s clampdowt on politically embqrrassing but nonttheless public informafion, os if hhis failure to correct course is the result of holdovers from the prior qdministration, who alsp are bzhiud abusyve xivhholdings in E&E Kegal’s other suit against State for simhlcr documents. The latter incluce redactions ow Obama officials joking about hpw foreign diplomats made clear the U.S. would have to bun others’ partidipation ii a Paris climate trraty, wnthholeing coeresiondence with uobnylsts pursulng uhe elimate agenda as internal delibeeative, ajd even redactinj a Rolling
and International Cooperation (NCSC) recently asked WRI think and other — including those from recognition that this is coming to end soonish and their desire to up channels in DC that are additional to the ones that are working now.” Morgan sought the Obama State Department’s assistance and, records show, was met an response, State they immediately arrange a call for their respective “China teams to talk”. In other records, State engaged in a discussion thread, “Subject: Jennifer Morgan”, it is implausibly withholding its entirety as b5, “deliberative Like records many relating Paris its circumvention of U.S. Constitution’s Article II, Section 2 for “advice and consent” of all treaties, this is plainly designed delay and awareness of activities. did even acknowledge the issue in today’s suit, let alone legal deadline that it is processing them. Overtures determine whether would alter its ongoing obstruction met favorable response. As such E&E Legal is forced again to sue to obtain public records, which on their face appear highly relevant to public debate about the government’s role in has a warming” and coordination that movement’s leading activists as well as with other countries which the U.S. to adopt the agenda’s harmful policies. These records even public interest given reports of parties having President promise to “cancel” the agreement the climate which had unambiguously declared was for US business” and allows bureaucrats control over how is unclear whether the new administration intends to the Obama administration’s clampdown on politically embarrassing nonetheless public information, or if this failure to correct course is the of holdovers prior administration, who also are behind abusive withholdings E&E Legal’s other suit State for similar documents. The latter include redactions of officials about how diplomats made clear U.S. would have buy others’ participation Paris climate withholding with climate agenda as internal deliberative, and redacting Rolling
 and International CooperatiOn (NCSC) receNtly aSkeD WRi tO cooRdinAte think tanks aND othEr advocates — including thOse idEnTIfieD By china — “Stem[minG] FrOM The ReCoGniTiON tHat thIs ADministRation is coMinG tO an end soonisH AnD their desiRe tO open up channEls In DC thAt Are ADditiOnaL to thE ones tHAt are wOrking welL nOW.” MorgaN Sought tHE obAma STate Department’s asSIsTAnce and, records Show, waS mET wITH an EntHusiastic rEsPonse, WIth StatE SuGGEStiNG they immediatEly arrange a CAll For theIr ResPEctive “china TeAMs tO talk”.

In otheR recOrds, State OfficiALs engagED in a disCussioN thReaD, “SubJEcT: JEnnIfER MoRGaN”, whICh iT is implaUsIbLy witHholDING In itS enTireTy as b5, “Deliberative pRocEss”. LIKe oTher rEcordS manY dIrectLy relaTing tO PAris and its circuMvenTion of the u.S. COnStiTuTion’s aRticle iI, SEctIon 2 for “aDvice anD ConSeNT” OF aLl treaties, this is plAiNLY dEsigned tO delay ANd ObSTruct pubLiC awArenESS of StAte’s ACtIvities.

STate diD NoT eVen acknOwLedge tHe ReqUesTs at iSSue iN today’S suit, let Alone DEmonstrate by thE Legal deadline THaT IT iS ProcEssIng them. OverTureS To deTermINe WheTHer StAte woUlD AlTEr its ongoing obstrucTiOn met nO favoRable response. as such E&E LeGAL Is forced Yet aGAiN To sue to obtain pUblic Records, whiCH on their Face aPpear higHly relevaNT To the ongOinG puBliC deBATe About the federAL GoveRnMent’s roLe iN what haS beComE a “gLobAl Warming” inDustry, anD cOoRdInAtiOn witH That moveMeNt’s LeAdiNg actIVists aS well As wiTh OtHEr cOuntrieS WhICH seeK tHe u.S. to AdoPt The agEnda’S HarMful polIcies.

ThesE reCOrds ArE oF even grEater public inTeRest given rEcEnt ReportS OF parties Having derailed President tRump’s prOmiSe to “cAnceL” the purpoRteD U.S. agrEemENt to thE DecemBer 2015 PaRiS clIMAte trEATy, WhiCh He had unambIGUouSly deClAred Was “bad fOr US business” and allOWs “fOreign bureaucRatS conTROl OveR HoW MucH eNErgY WE use”.

It is unclear Whether the NeW AdMinistratiON inTeNds to coNtinue tHe ObaMA adminiStration’s Clampdown On PoliTICalLy embarrasSing but nOnethelesS PubliC InFormaTioN, or if tHiS faIlure To corrECt cOurse Is the rEsUlt of hOldovErS from the Prior administration, who aLso are BehinD abUsive withHolDIngS in E&E LegaL’s otHer suit agaInsT StAte foR siMIlar dOcumENtS. ThE LatteR incLUde redactIOnS of oBAmA officials jOKINg aBout hOw fOReign dIploMats made clear the U.s. Would have to buy OtheRS’ ParTicIPatiOn In a Paris climatE trEaTY, WithholdInG correspondEnce with LoBByistS pursuIng the Climate AGEnDA as intErnaL deLiberativE, anD eVEn redacTiNg A rollinG
 and International Coopera tion (NCSC ) rec ent lyas kedWRIto coordinatet hink  tanks and other advoc ates—i nclu d in g tho se iden t if i e d b yCh ina  — “s tem[m ing ] fromthe recogn iti on  that this A d mi nistration  is  coming to a n e nd soo ni sha nd th eir  desi re too pen up  channels  i n  DC th a t are a d d it iona l to the ones tha t  a r e working well  now.”  M o rg a n  so ugh t the Obam aState Departm e nt ’ s ass i stance and, r ecords show ,  wa s metwi tha n enth usias ti c  re sponse, wit h St ate sugge stingt hey imm e diately  arran gea c allf or  t hei rr esp e ct ive “Ch ina team sto  talk ”.
I n o ther  re cord s, St ate officials  en gage d  in  a di scuss ionth read,  “Subj ect:Je nnifer Morgan”,  whi ch it isimp la usi bl y wit h holdin g i n i ts enti rety as b5,  “ d e l ib erative process”.Li k e  o ther rec ords m a ny  d i rectly r el ati ng t o Paris  and it s circum ventio n  o fthe U.S .Consti tu tio n’s  Arti c le I I, Sec tion 2 f or “a d vice and conse n t” of all tre a ti e s ,t hisisplainly des igne d  todela y  a ndo bstru ct pu bl i ca wareness of State’s  a ctivit ies.
State did no t even ack n o w ledge th e re q ue s ts at issue in  toda y’s suit,l et alone  demo nstrateby the le g a l deadli netha t i t i s pr ocessing them . Over tu res todet erminewhe the r S tat ewould alt er its o ng oi ng  o bst ructi o n met no  f avo ra ble  resp o nse. A s suc h E& ELe g alis forc e dy e t ag ai nto s ueto  obta in p u bli c recor ds, which  on thei rfa ce appe ar highly rel ev ant to the  o ngo ing pu b l ic debat e about the federal gov e rnment’ s r ole i n wh at has be com e a “g lob a l warm ing” i ndust ry , a n d  coor d i na tio nwith thatm o vem ent’s  l eadi ng acti vists as well as w i thother countri eswhic h se ekt he U.S .t o a d o pt the agenda’s  harmful p ol i ci es.

These rec or ds areof even  grea t er publ ic intere st givenre cent r epo rts of par ties hav ing derai l ed Pr e si dentTru mp’s p ro mis e to“cance l ” t he pu rporte dU.S. a greem en t to the  December 2015 Paris cl imatetreat y,which hehad una mbiguousl y de clared was  “b adfor U S b u sines s” a n dall o ws “f orei g n bureauc r at s c o n tr ol over how m u chenerg y w e  use”. 

It  is unclear wheth e r the new admi nist r a tio n i n tend sto continue th e O ba m a  adminis tr ation’s cla mpdown o np oliti callyembarr assingb u tn onethe less  pu blic info rma ti o n, or i fth i s fail ureto  corre ct cou r se i s the result of ho ldove r s  from the  prio radminis t rati on, who al so are behi nd abu sive  with holding sin E&E  Le ga l’s others uit again st St ate for  s imil ardocume nts. T he la tter  i ncl ude redac t i on s  o fO bam a of ficia ls  jok ing about how fore ign diploma ts  ma d e  clear th e U.S. would  ha ve to b uy others’ part i ci p ation  in aParisclimate tre at y, with hol d i ng corres pondencew ith  l obby ists pur su ingth e c li mate agenda asinternal  deliber a t ive, a nde venr edacti ng  a Rolling
 and_International Cooperation_(NCSC) recently asked WRI_to coordinate_think_tanks and_other_advocates — including_those identified by_China — “stem[ming] from_the recognition that_this_Administration is coming to an end soonish and their desire to open up channels_in_DC that_are_additional_to the ones that are_working well now.” Morgan sought_the Obama_State Department’s assistance and, records show, was met_with_an enthusiastic response,_with State suggesting they immediately arrange a call for_their respective “China teams to talk”.

In_other records, State_officials_engaged_in a discussion thread,_“Subject: Jennifer Morgan”, which it is_implausibly withholding in its entirety as_b5, “deliberative process”. Like other records many_directly relating to Paris and its_circumvention of the U.S. Constitution’s_Article II,_Section 2 for “advice and_consent” of all_treaties, this_is plainly designed_to delay and obstruct public awareness_of State’s activities.

State_did not even acknowledge the requests_at_issue in today’s_suit,_let_alone demonstrate_by the legal_deadline_that it_is_processing them. Overtures to determine whether_State_would alter its ongoing obstruction met no_favorable response. As such_E&E_Legal is forced yet_again to sue to obtain_public records, which on their face_appear highly_relevant to_the ongoing public debate about the federal government’s role in what_has become a “global warming” industry,_and coordination with that_movement’s leading_activists_as well as_with_other countries_which seek the U.S. to adopt the_agenda’s harmful_policies.

These records are of even greater_public interest given recent_reports_of parties having derailed President Trump’s_promise to “cancel” the purported U.S._agreement to the December 2015_Paris_climate_treaty, which he had unambiguously_declared was “bad for US business”_and allows “foreign_bureaucrats control over how much energy we_use”.

It_is unclear whether the new administration_intends_to continue the Obama administration’s clampdown_on_politically_embarrassing but nonetheless public information,_or if this failure to correct_course is the result of holdovers from the prior_administration, who also_are behind abusive withholdings in_E&E_Legal’s_other suit against State for similar documents. The latter include_redactions of_Obama officials joking_about how foreign diplomats made clear the U.S. would have_to buy others’ participation in a Paris_climate treaty, withholding correspondence with lobbyists pursuing the climate agenda as_internal deliberative, and even redacting a Rolling