 and Newton’s theory and give us a more “close to experience” physics that we certainly not had have in the past as regards gravity. With the Tully-Fisher relation and Allais’ finding of a diurnal variation in surface gravity, we do have independent indications that “spreading infrared radiation” might be attractive. Sandwiching the test mass between a heat source and a cold sink is critical to getting a reliable, repeatable change of weight. These condition are not normally encountered in everyday life. I forgot another independent support for my “unexpected” result. Podkletnov hovered a test mass over a vat of liquid nitrogen and observed a decrease in weight (of ~3%) as I did in one of my experiments (4.9 %). Of course, most people think that the change of weight of Podketnov’s test mass was due to the rotating superconductor in the vat. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eugene_Podkletnov

Ethan, here’s a simple question that maybe you can address in a future blog post.

You state that the universe is ~13.7 billion years old, and that it’s approximately 93 billion light-years across.
That doesn’t seem to line up.
Imagine two pieces of light going in opposite directions created during the big bang. Since the universe is 13.7 billion years old, the maximum size would be 13.7×2 = 27.4 billion light-years across.

How can it be larger than “the speed of light times the age” would indicate? I was at a Parent Meeting at my daughter's high school recently, and the instructor for the AP US History course was explaining his course, that it covered the time period between Columbus' discovery and 9/11. A parent asked him why he didn't cover up to the present day, and he explained that, in the academic community, usually a couple of decades have to pass for history to "settle." What he meant is that the "facts" sometimes aren't known or apparent until many years later.

Thinking about 9/11, I was reminded of the impact that event had on our industry. The economic impact now seems like it was a rehearsal for the current recession. The day of the attack, our local major metropolitan airport called the company I was managing and asked us to station a truck there 24 hours a day. We were there for the next 3
and Newton ’s theory and give us a more “ close to experience ” purgative that we surely not had receive in the past as regards graveness. With the Tully - Fisher relation and Allais ’ determination of a diurnal variation in surface graveness, we do have independent indications that “ spread infrared radiation ” might be attractive. Sandwiching the examination mass between a heat generator and a cold sink is critical to getting a reliable, repeatable change of weight. These condition are not normally meet in everyday life. I forgot another autonomous support for my “ unexpected ” result. Podkletnov brood a test batch over a vat of liquid nitrogen and observed a decrease in weight (of ~3 %) as I did in one of my experiment (4.9 %). Of course, most people think that the change of weight of Podketnov ’s test mass was due to the rotating superconductor in the vat. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eugene_Podkletnov 

 Ethan, here ’s a simple question that maybe you can address in a future blog post. 

 You state that the population is ~13.7 billion old age old, and that it ’s approximately 93 billion faint - days across. 
 That does n’t seem to line up. 
 Imagine two pieces of light going in opposite steering created during the big bang. Since the universe is 13.7 billion years old, the maximum size would be 13.7×2 = 27.4 billion easy - years across. 

 How can it be larger than “ the speed of light meter the historic period ” would indicate? I was at a Parent Meeting at my daughter's high school recently, and the instructor for the AP US History course was explaining his path, that it covered the time period between Columbus' discovery and 9/11. A parent ask him why he didn't cover up to the present day, and he explained that, in the academic community, normally a couple of decades have to pass for history to " settle. " What he meant is that the " fact " sometimes aren't known or apparent until many old age later. 

 think about 9/11, I was reminded of the shock that event had on our industry. The economic impact now seem like it was a rehearsal for the current recession. The day of the attack, our local major metropolitan airport called the company I was managing and asked us to station a truck there 24 hours a sidereal day. We were there for the next 3
 anf Newton’s theory and givt us a more “close to expxrience” physics that we certainly not had heve un tht past as regards gfavity. Winh the Tuoly-Fmsher relation ais Allais’ findjkg of e diurnal variajion in surfdce gravity, we du kave independent indications that “spweading ijfrared radiatyon” kyght be attractive. Sandwiching the tesf mass uetween a heat xource and a cold sink is fritlcal to getting a geliable, reksatwvle change ow weight. These conditikn are not normally encountered in ereryday lifg. J vmrgot anothxr indvpendent support for ky “unexlected” result. Iodklxtnoc hovered a test mass over a vat of liqoid nitrogan and observed a dwceease in feigfr (ow ~3%) zs I did ij oie of my exleriments (4.9 %). Of course, most peokle nnink that ths chande of weight of Podketnov’s test mass was gue to the rotating supercinductor in the vat. hjtp://en.wikipqdia.org/wiki/Eugene_Podkletnov

Ethan, here’s a simple qgestikv tkqt mahve you can address in a future blog post.

You staes uhan the universe is ~13.7 billion yrags jld, and that kt’s ap'dosimately 93 billion pight-yewrs axross.
That doexn’t seem to line up.
Imagine rwo pieces oy lught going in oppodite directnons cteated during the big bang. Siuce ths universe ls 13.7 billikv years old, the oaxpmum size would be 13.7×2 = 27.4 billion jight-yearw acxoss.

How zan ot be jarger thaj “the speed of light timfs thg age” fould indifate? I was at a Parent Meeting ev my daughter'x vigv school recektly, and the inftructor for tke AP US Histury course was ex'laining his course, that hj covered the time pewiod betqeen Coujmbus' discoveru and 9/11. A iaxent askee him why he didn't coxsr up to the przrtnr day, and he ecplxinqd tiat, ig the academiw coomuvoty, urually a compld of decades have to pasv fod history to "settlr." Rhat he neant is that the "facys" sometimes aren't knowi or a'pareny ugtil many years later.

Thinking zbout 9/11, I aas reminded of the impact that event had on our industry. The economic impact now seems oike it was a reheatsak for the cnrrent recessiot. The day of the attqck, our local majpr metropolitan airpodt calned tje company I was managing and asked us to station a truck there 24 hours a eay. We were there ror yhe nvxt 3
and Newton’s theory and give us a to physics that certainly not had regards With the Tully-Fisher and Allais’ finding a diurnal variation in surface gravity, do have independent indications that “spreading infrared radiation” might be attractive. Sandwiching the mass between a heat source and a cold sink is critical to getting reliable, change weight. condition are not normally encountered in everyday life. I forgot another independent support for my “unexpected” Podkletnov hovered a test mass over a vat liquid nitrogen and observed decrease in weight (of ~3%) I in one my (4.9 Of course, most think that the change of weight of Podketnov’s test mass was due to the rotating superconductor in vat. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eugene_Podkletnov a simple that you address in a post. You state that the universe years old, and that it’s approximately 93 billion across. That seem to line up. Imagine two of light going in opposite directions created during big bang. Since the universe is 13.7 billion years old, the maximum size would be 27.4 billion light-years across. can it be than speed light the age” indicate? I was at a Parent Meeting at my daughter's high recently, and the instructor for the AP US History course his that it covered time period between Columbus' and A parent asked him didn't up day, he that, in the academic usually a couple of decades to pass for history is that the "facts" sometimes aren't known or until many years later. Thinking about 9/11, was reminded of the impact that event had on our industry. The impact now it was a rehearsal for the current recession. day of the attack, local major metropolitan airport called the company I was and us to a truck there hours a day. were there for 3
 and Newton’s theory and give us A more “close To expEriEncE” pHysiCs thAt we certainly nOT had Have in the past as regards GraviTy. wIth tHE TUlly-FIsher reLAtION anD ALlAis’ FiNDiNg of a DiuRnal varIation in suRfaCe Gravity, we do hAVe IndependenT inDications thaT “spReadinG iNfrARed raDiaTion” mIght be ATtractIve. SandwiChINg the tESt mass bETWeEn a hEat source and a cold SInK Is critical to geTting a ReLIaBLE, rePeaTable changE oF weigHT. These cONdITIOn aRE not normally eNcountered iN EveRyday lIfE. I fORgot anOther InDEpeNdent supporT for My “unexpecTed” resULt. PodklETnov hovEred a tEst MasS oveR A vAt Of lIqUId nITrOgeN And Observed A dEcRease In weIGHT (Of ~3%) as i diD in oNe of mY experiments (4.9 %). OF coUrse, MOst PeoplE thinK thaT tHe chaNge of wEight Of podketnov’s test mAss wAs due to thE roTaTinG sUpercONductoR in The Vat. http://En.wikipEDia.OrG/WIKi/eugene_Podkletnov

EtHaN, HErE’s a simplE questIOn ThAT maybe yoU cAn aDdreSS In a fuTure BLoG post.

You State tHAt ThE univerSe Is ~13.7 billIoN yeArs Old, anD That It’s appRoximateLy 93 bilLIon light-years aCRoss.
That doesn’T SeEM To LIne uP.
ImAgine two pieCes oF LighT goiNG iN opPOsite DirecTiONs CReated during the big bAnG. Since The unIverse is 13.7 billiOn years old, THE Maximum sIze wOUlD Be 13.7×2 = 27.4 billion light-Years Across.

How cAN it be larGer thAn “the speEd of light TIMes the agE” woUld IndIcaTE? i wAs at a Parent MeETIng aT mY daughtEr's High schOol RecEntLy, aNd The instruCtor for tHe aP uS hiStoRy couRSe was expLaIniNg His CoursE, That it CoverEd thE tImE PerIod betwEEn cOLumbUs' DiScovEry AnD 9/11. A parEnt aSKed Him why hE didn't covEr uP To thE pReSent day, And he explaineD tHat, in the acAdEmiC commuNITy, usuallY a couple of decades have to PAss for hIstOry to "SettLe." What he mEanT is thaT thE "Facts" sOmetimEs areN't KnoWN Or appAREnT unTiL many years LATer.

thinkInG aboUt 9/11, I was rEminded of the impact THat Event had on our IndUstrY. tHe EcoNOmIC imPaCT noW SEems like it was a rEhearsal foR tHE cUrrent receSSioN. THe day of The attaCk, our LOcal majOr metropoLitan airpOrT calLED thE company I wAs managiNg and askeD Us to sTAtIon a tRucK there 24 HoUrs A day. WE were tHEre For thE next 3
 and Newton’s theory and g ive us a m ore “ clo seto  exp erie nce” physics t h at w e certainly not had ha ve in  t h e pa s tas re gards g r av i t y.Wi th  th eT ul ly-Fi she r relat ion and Al lai s’  finding ofa  d iurnal var iat ion in surfa cegravit y,  we do ha veindep endent indica tions tha t“ spread i ng infr a r ed  rad iation” might bea tt r active. Sandwi chingth e  t e s t m ass  between a  h eat s o urce an d  a c o lds ink is critic al to getti n g a  relia bl e,r epeata ble c ha n geof weight.Thes e conditi on are not nor m ally en counte red  in  eve r yd ay  li fe .  If or got ano ther ind ep en dentsupp o r t formy“une xpect ed” result. P odk letn o v h overe d a t estma ss ov er a v at of  l iquid nitrogenandobserveda d ec rea se  in w e ight ( of~3% ) as Idid ino neof m y  e xperiments (4.9 %) .O f  c ourse, m ost pe o pl et hink tha tthe  cha n g e ofweig h tof Podke tnov’s te st  mass w as  due t othe  ro tatin g  sup ercond uctor in  thev at. http://en. w ikipedia.org/ w ik i / Eu g ene_ Pod kletnov

Et han, here ’s a si mpl e  ques tionth a tm aybe you can addres sin a f uture  blog post.
You statet h a t the un iver s ei s ~13.7 billio n yea rs old, an d  that it ’s ap proximat ely 93 bi l l ion ligh t-y ear s a cro s s .That doesn’ts e em t oline up .
I maginetwo  pi ece s o flight goi ng in op po si te  d ire ction s  created  d uri ng  th e big bang.Since  the  u ni v ers e is 13 . 7b i llio nye arsold ,the m axim u m s ize wou ld be 13. 7×2 = 27 .4  b illionlight-years a cr oss.

Howca n i t be l a r ger than  “the speed of light ti m es theage ” wou ld i ndicate?I w as ata P a rent M eeting  at m ydau g h ter's h ig h s ch ool recent l y , a nd th einst ructorfor the AP US Hist o rycourse was ex pla inin g hi s c o ur s e,th a t i t covered the tim e period b et w ee n Columbus '  di sc overy a nd 9/11 . A p a rent as ked him w hy he did n' t co v e r u p to the p resent d ay, and h e  expl a in ed th at,  in th eaca demic  commu n ity , usu ally a  c oupleof de ca des have  to pass for history to  "sett le."Wha t he mean t i s  th at the "f acts " sometime s a ren 't kn own or ap pare n tunt i l man y ye a rs later. 
T hin k i ng  about 9/11 , I  wa s rem ind e d of t he i mpact that eventh ad on our indu stry . The  ec o nomi cimpact now see msli k e  it wasarehearsal f or the c ur r ent r ecessi on. Th e day o f th e  attac k, o urlocal maj orme t ropolit an  a i rportcall ed  the c ompany I wa s managing and ask ed us t o sta t ion  a tr uc k there 24 h ours a day . We were t here f or t he ne xt 3
 and_Newton’s theory_and give us a_more “close_to_experience” physics_that_we certainly not_had have in_the past as regards_gravity. With the_Tully-Fisher_relation and Allais’ finding of a diurnal variation in surface gravity, we do have_independent_indications that_“spreading_infrared_radiation” might be attractive. Sandwiching_the test mass between a_heat source_and a cold sink is critical to getting_a_reliable, repeatable change_of weight. These condition are not normally encountered in_everyday life. I forgot another independent_support for my_“unexpected”_result._Podkletnov hovered a test_mass over a vat of liquid_nitrogen and observed a decrease in_weight (of ~3%) as I did in_one of my experiments (4.9 %)._Of course, most people think_that the_change of weight of Podketnov’s_test mass was_due to_the rotating superconductor_in the vat. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eugene_Podkletnov

Ethan, here’s a_simple question that_maybe you can address in a_future_blog post.

You state_that_the_universe is_~13.7 billion years_old,_and that_it’s_approximately 93 billion light-years across.
That doesn’t_seem_to line up.
Imagine two pieces of light_going in opposite directions_created_during the big bang._Since the universe is 13.7_billion years old, the maximum size_would be_13.7×2 =_27.4 billion light-years across.

How can it be larger than “the speed_of light times the age” would_indicate? I was at_a Parent_Meeting_at my daughter's_high_school recently,_and the instructor for the AP US_History course_was explaining his course, that it_covered the time period_between_Columbus' discovery and 9/11. A parent_asked him why he didn't cover_up to the present day,_and_he_explained that, in the academic_community, usually a couple of decades_have to pass_for history to "settle." What he meant_is_that the "facts" sometimes aren't known_or_apparent until many years later.

Thinking about_9/11,_I_was reminded of the impact_that event had on our industry._The economic impact now seems like it was a_rehearsal for the_current recession. The day of_the_attack,_our local major metropolitan airport called the company I was_managing and_asked us to_station a truck there 24 hours a day. We were_there for the next 3