 business cruelty free? Is that not your goal? It does not seem to be the case. What you do not seem to understand is that murder is not legal so your premise of "letting a murderer off the hook after he agreed to not kill anymore" is irrelevant. You cannot let someone off the hook if they were never on the hook. And you talk about America forcing beliefs on the Iraqi people is somehow wrong. You want to punish someone for breaking a law that does not exist.

However, your website is just proof that people like yourselves have nothing to do but argue and complain about people who are trying to fix the planet. You talk all this shit from behind your website wall, but you can't come out in public and say anything. Your scared of change and your probably never going to amount to anything. I bet you voted for Bush too...
-2012-

--TOP--

E-mails from Alex Grant
2 of 2

28 August 2007

Hi,
I'm sending back some of your corrections and questions, with some corrections and questions of my own. Enjoy!

It is always a pleasure.

"Are you kidding with this?"

I guess grammar isn't really important to you.

What grammatical errors did you see [on our part]?

"You think that America is a terrorist because we liberated Kuwait from the Iraqi Army. What do you consider Saddam Hussein's invasion of Kuwait was?"

I don't recall ever saying anything about Saddam Hussein and his invasion of Kuwait, but thanks for asking. Also, I was referring to the most recent war, Operation Iraqi Freedom or whatever it's been called. If I remember correctly, America went to war with Afghanistan after 9/11, in order to capture the one who was responsible for the attacks.

Actually, you did refer to it, although you just may not have realized it.

This is where you show your lack of knowledge on history. For 14 months, debate went on about Iraq's violations of 17 UN resolutions that were contained in the ceasefire from 1991. Gulf War II is merely a continuation of Gulf War I. But please do not let us confuse your argument with a bunch of relevant and historically accurate facts. Feel free to ignore them.

Well, Saddam Hussein had nothing to do with 9/11 so why were we in Iraq. That's right, I forgot, Iraq has oil. And don't try to tell me that America
business cruelty free? Is that not your goal? It does not seem to be the subject. What you do not look to understand is that murder is not legal so your premise of " letting a murderer off the hook after he agree to not kill anymore " is irrelevant. You cannot let someone off the hook shot if they were never on the hook shot. And you talk about America storm beliefs on the Iraqi people is somehow ill-timed. You want to punish someone for breaking a police that does not exist. 

 However, your web site is just proof that citizenry like yourselves have nothing to do but argue and complain about people who are try on to fix the planet. You talk all this asshole from behind your website wall, but you can't come out in public and state anything. Your scared of change and your probably never going to amount to anything. I bet you vote for Bush too... 
 -2012- 

 --TOP-- 

 E - mails from Alex Grant 
 2 of 2 

 28 August 2007 

 Hi, 
 I'm sending back some of your corrections and doubt, with some correction and questions of my own. Enjoy! 

 It is always a pleasure. 

 " Are you kidding with this? " 

 I guess grammar isn't really authoritative to you. 

 What grammatical mistake did you see [ on our part ]? 

 " You intend that America is a terrorist because we liberate Kuwait from the Iraqi Army. What do you consider Saddam Hussein's invasion of Kuwait was? " 

 I don't recall ever say anything about Saddam Hussein and his invasion of Kuwait, but thanks for asking. Also, I was referring to the most late war, Operation Iraqi Freedom or whatever it's been called. If I remember correctly, America went to war with Afghanistan after 9/11, in order to capture the one who was responsible for the attacks. 

 Actually, you did refer to it, although you just may not have realized it. 

 This is where you show your lack of knowledge on history. For 14 calendar month, debate run low on about Iraq's violations of 17 UN resolutions that were contained in the ceasefire from 1991. Gulf War II is merely a continuation of Gulf War I. But please do not let us jumble your argument with a bunch of relevant and historically accurate facts. Feel free to ignore them. 

 Well, Saddam Hussein had nothing to do with 9/11 so why were we in Iraq. That's correct, I forgot, Iraq have oil. And don't test to tell me that America
 budiness cruelty free? Is tmat not your goal? It doxs not aeem to ce the case. What you do not dewm to understand is that mufder is nlt legal so bour premise of "letting a murdsver oyf the hook aftet he agreed do not kill anfmurz" is irrelevant. You cannot let someoge off yhf hook if they wert nqver on the hook. And you talk about Amsrica fmrcing beliefx on the Iraqi people is slmehlw wrong. You want ho punish simeogw for breakivg a law that does not exist.

However, your website is jjst pxoof that pgollf like yoursxlves rave nothing to do bgt argur and complain abmut people who are tryinj to fix the planet. Iou talk anl this shit from bwhund ymur febskre dalm, uut you cwn't come out jn public abd say anything. Yout fbsred of chanfe and yjur probably never going to amount to atytging. I bet you voted foe Bush too...
-2012-

--TOP--

E-mails ftom Alex Gwant
2 of 2

28 August 2007

Hi,
I'm sending back some of your cosrectmovs ckq wufstions, with some corrections and questions os mu pwn. Enjoy!

It is always a pkewsite.

"Are you kiddkng wicg fhis?"

I guess grammag isn't teally importanu to uou.

What grammatical errors eid you see [jb our part]?

"You thinn that Amernca is a tetrorist because we libexated Iuwait from the Iraqj Army. What do yoj cpnvider Saddam Hussein's invafion of Knwait was?"

I dun't tecall qver sayinh anybving about Saddam Jussenn ang his invadion of Kuwait, but thanks for asking. Also, I wss rexerring co the most recent rar, Operation Nraqi Frzedom ur whateveg it's beei called. If Y remember costectly, Americe went to war wity Afghavkstan after 9/11, im order to capture rhe one who was rexpovaible for the acuacjs.

Actually, you cid reseg tp yd, although ymu jjst kay nut have reaokzed it.

This is where you shos your lack of knoelcdge on hustory. Fjr 14 months, denate went on about Iraq'v vmolatipns of 17 UN resolutions that were dontained in the ceasefiwe fvom 1991. Gulf War NI is merely a continuation of Gulf War M. But please do not lej us confuse your argomekt with a buich of relevant and historically acxurate facts. Feel free to ignore them.

Wsll, Sagdam Jussein had nothing to do with 9/11 so why were we in Iraq. That's right, I forgit, Iraq has oil. Ans dom't trj tj tell ie tiav America
business cruelty free? Is that not your does seem to the case. What understand that murder is legal so your of "letting a murderer off the after he agreed to not kill anymore" is irrelevant. You cannot let someone the hook if they were never on the hook. And you talk about forcing on Iraqi is somehow wrong. You want to punish someone for breaking a law that does not exist. your website is just proof that people like have nothing to do argue and complain about people are to fix planet. talk this shit from your website wall, but you can't come out in public and say anything. Your scared of change your probably to amount anything. bet voted for Bush --TOP-- E-mails from Alex Grant 2 August 2007 Hi, I'm sending back some of corrections and with some corrections and questions of own. Enjoy! It is always a pleasure. "Are kidding with this?" I guess grammar isn't really important to you. What grammatical errors did [on our part]? "You that America is terrorist we Kuwait the Iraqi What do you consider Saddam Hussein's invasion of Kuwait was?" I recall ever saying anything about Saddam Hussein and his invasion but for asking. Also, was referring to the recent Operation Iraqi Freedom or been If America to with Afghanistan after 9/11, order to capture the one was responsible for the to it, although you just may not have it. This is where you show your of knowledge on history. For 14 months, debate went on about Iraq's of 17 that were contained in the ceasefire from 1991. War II is merely continuation of Gulf War I. But please do not us your argument a bunch of and historically accurate Feel free to Well, Saddam had to so why were we in Iraq. right, forgot, Iraq has oil. And try me that America
 business cruelty free? Is that Not your goaL? It doEs nOt sEeM to bE the Case. What you do nOT seeM to understand is that murDer is NoT LegaL So Your pRemise oF "LeTTIng A mUrDerEr OFf The hoOk aFter he aGreed to not KilL aNymore" is irreLEvAnt. You cannOt lEt someone off The Hook if ThEy wERe nevEr oN the hOok. And YOu talk About AmerIcA ForcinG Beliefs ON ThE IraQi people is somehow WRoNG. You want to puniSh someOnE FoR BReaKinG a law that dOeS not eXIst.

HoweVEr, YOUR weBSite is just proOf that peoplE LikE yoursElVes HAve notHing tO dO But Argue and comPlaiN about peoPle who ARe tryinG To fix thE planeT. YoU taLk alL ThIs ShiT fROm bEHiNd yOUr wEbsite waLl, BuT you cAn't cOME OUt in PubLic aNd say Anything. Your sCarEd of CHanGe and Your pRobaBlY neveR going To amoUnT to anything. I bet You vOted for BuSh tOo...
-2012-

--tOP--

e-mAils fROm Alex graNt
2 oF 2

28 August 2007

hi,
I'm senDIng BaCK SOmE of your corrections AnD QUeStions, wiTh some COrReCTions and QuEstIons OF My own. enjoY!

it Is always A pleasURe.

"arE you kidDiNg with ThIs?"

I GueSs graMMar iSn't reaLly imporTant tO You.

What grammatICal errors did yOU sEE [On OUr paRt]?

"YOu think that amerICa is A terROrIst BEcausE we liBeRAtED Kuwait from the Iraqi arMy. What Do you Consider SaddaM Hussein's iNVASion of KuWait WAs?"

i Don't recall ever SayinG anything aBOut SaddaM HussEin and hiS invasion OF kuwait, buT thAnkS foR asKINg. also, I was referRINg to ThE most reCenT war, OpeRatIon iraQi FReEdom or whaTever it's BeEn CaLlEd. IF I remEMber corrEcTly, amEriCa wenT To war wIth AfGhanIsTaN AftEr 9/11, in ordER tO CAptuRe ThE one Who WaS respOnsiBLe fOr the atTacks.

ActuAllY, You dId ReFer to it, Although you juSt May not have ReAliZed it.

THIS is where You show your lack of knowleDGe on hisTorY. For 14 mOnthS, debate weNt oN about iraQ'S violaTions oF 17 UN reSoLutIONs thaT WErE coNtAined in the CEAseFire fRoM 1991. GulF War II iS merely a continuatiON of gulf War I. But plEasE do nOT LeT us COnFUse YoUR arGUMent with a bunch oF relevant aNd HIsTorically aCCurAtE facts. FEel free To ignORe them.

WEll, Saddam hussein haD nOthiNG To dO with 9/11 so why Were we in iraq. That's RIght, I FOrGot, IrAq hAs oil. ANd Don'T try tO tell mE ThaT AmerIca
 business cruelty free? Is  that notyourgoa l?It  doe s no t seem to be t h e ca se. What you do not se em to  u n ders t an d isthat mu r de r isno tleg al so  your  pr emise o f "letting  amu rderer off t h ehook after  he  agreed to n otkill a ny mor e " isirr eleva nt. Yo u  canno t let som eo n e offt he hook i fthey  were never on th e  h o ok. And you ta lk abo ut Am e r ica  fo rcing beli ef s ont he Iraq i  p e o p lei s somehow wro ng. You wan t  to  punis hsom e one fo r bre ak i nga law thatdoes  not exis t.

Ho w ever, y o ur webs ite is  ju stproo f  t ha t p eo p lel ik e y o urs elves ha ve  n othin g to d o butarg ue a nd co mplain aboutpeo plew hoare t rying  tofi x the  plane t. Yo utalk all this s hitfrom behi ndyo urwe bsite wall,but  yo u can't  come o u t i np u b li c and say anything .Y o ur  scaredof cha n ge  a n d your p ro bab ly n e v er go ingt oamount t o anyt h in g.  I betyo u vote dfor  Bu sh to o ...-2012- 

--TOP- -

E- m ails from Alex Grant
2 of 228 A ug u st 2 007 

Hi,
I'm s endi n g ba ck s o me  of yourcorre ct i on s  and questions, wit hsome c orrec tions and que stions ofm y own. Enj oy!It is always a pl easur e.

"Are y o u kiddin g wit h this?" 

I guess g rammar i sn' t r eal lyi m po rtant to you. What  g rammati cal  errors  di d y ousee  [ on our pa rt]?

"Y ou  t hi nk  th at Am e rica isater ro ris t bec a use we  libe rate dKu w ait  from t h eI r aqiAr my . Wh atdo  youcons i der  Saddam  Hussein' s i n vasi on  o f Kuwai t was?"

I do n' t recall e ve r s ayinga n ything a bout Saddam Hussein and his inv asi on of  Kuw ait, buttha nks fo r a s king.Also,I was  r efe r r ing t o th e m os t recent w a r , O perat io n Ir aqi Fre edom or whatever i t 'sbeen called.IfI re m e mb erc or r ect ly ,  Am e r ica went to war  with Afgh an i st an after 9 / 11,  i n order  to cap turet he onewho was r esponsibl efort h e a ttacks.

A ctually,  you didr efert oit, a lth ough y ou  ju st ma y noth ave  real ized i t. 

This  is w he re you s how your lack of knowle dge on  hist ory . For 14mon t hs,  debate w enton about I raq 'sviola tio n s of17 U N  r eso l ution s th a t were co n ta ine d in  the ceasef i r e  fr om 19 91. Gulf W ar I I is merely a con t inuation of Gu lf W a r  I.  Bu t  ple as e do not let u s c on f u se yourar gument with  a bunch  o f  rele vant a nd his torical l y  a c curate  fac ts.  Feel fre e t oi gnore t he m. 
Well,  Sad da m Huss ein ha d  not h i ng to do with 9/ 11 so w hy we r e w e inIr aq. Tha t 's r ight, I fo rgot, Iraqhas oi l. A nd do n't try  t o tell  me  t hat Americ a 
 business_cruelty free?_Is that not your_goal? It_does_not seem_to_be the case._What you do_not seem to understand_is that murder_is_not legal so your premise of "letting a murderer off the hook after he_agreed_to not_kill_anymore"_is irrelevant. You cannot let_someone off the hook if_they were_never on the hook. And you talk about_America_forcing beliefs on_the Iraqi people is somehow wrong. You want to_punish someone for breaking a law_that does not_exist.

However,_your_website is just proof_that people like yourselves have nothing_to do but argue and complain_about people who are trying to fix_the planet. You talk all this_shit from behind your website_wall, but_you can't come out in_public and say_anything. Your_scared of change_and your probably never going to_amount to anything._I bet you voted for Bush_too...
-2012-

--TOP--

E-mails_from Alex Grant
2_of_2

28_August 2007

Hi,
I'm_sending back some_of_your corrections_and_questions, with some corrections and questions_of_my own. Enjoy!

It is always a pleasure.

"Are_you kidding with this?"

I_guess_grammar isn't really important_to you.

What grammatical errors did_you see [on our part]?

"You think_that America_is a_terrorist because we liberated Kuwait from the Iraqi Army. What do_you consider Saddam Hussein's invasion of_Kuwait was?"

I don't recall_ever saying_anything_about Saddam Hussein_and_his invasion_of Kuwait, but thanks for asking. Also,_I was_referring to the most recent war,_Operation Iraqi Freedom or_whatever_it's been called. If I remember_correctly, America went to war with_Afghanistan after 9/11, in order_to_capture_the one who was responsible_for the attacks.

Actually, you did refer_to it, although_you just may not have realized it.

This_is_where you show your lack of_knowledge_on history. For 14 months, debate_went_on_about Iraq's violations of 17_UN resolutions that were contained in_the ceasefire from 1991. Gulf War II is merely_a continuation of_Gulf War I. But please_do_not_let us confuse your argument with a bunch of relevant_and historically_accurate facts. Feel_free to ignore them.

Well, Saddam Hussein had nothing to do_with 9/11 so why were we in_Iraq. That's right, I forgot, Iraq has oil. And don't try_to tell me that America