

“It needs hardly be said that such conduct would manifestly contravene the provisions of the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act.”

Furthermore, the judge criticised the police for using the smell of cannabis as the sole grounds for searching Fowlie.

The charge against Fowlie, of possessing 0.7g of cannabis, barely enough for half a joint, was dismissed.

Mr O’Connor said he thought the police were justified searching Mr Fowlie.

“The reality of it is if smelling drugs doesn’t give grounds for suspecting someone’s got them, then it’s hard to imagine what does.

“However, I suspect the judgment is probably a reflection of how much (cannabis) was found more than anything else,” Mr O’Connor said.

“I suspect that the judge wouldn’t have been making the same decision had the police found a pound of cannabis on him.”

Mr O’Connor said he thought the judge’s comments would make the police job a little bit harder but would not change who they searched.

“It really doesn’t mean much at all — it doesn’t change anything at all.”

A spokeswoman for the police said last night that they would take on board and respect the judgment and it could lead to a review of how much evidence was needed to stop and search people.

Don Mathias, an expert in criminal defence law, said the ruling was significant.

Green MP Nandor Tanczos, Fowlie’s business partner in The Hempstore Aotearoa, hailed the ruling as an important legal finding for civil rights in New Zealand.

“This ruling is a major challenge to the police practice of targeting and searching certain members of the public for no good reason and confirms that police in this country routinely and arbitrarily stop and search people for no reason other than how they look,” he said. KRAZY KAJU: Already answered this. As for certificates in what I teach....er...the website is about all yer gonna get on that one.

FERYK: I joined this site because I like what it does. I had no illusions that I would somehow not eventually come under scrutiny. Frankly, I am enjoying this, it's an intriguing experience to be on the recieving end...and hell, my website gets some traffic, which is always a good thing. No publicity is bad
“ It needs hardly be said that such conduct would manifestly conflict the provision of the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act. ” 

 Furthermore, the judge criticised the police for using the spirit of cannabis as the sole grounds for search Fowlie. 

 The bang against Fowlie, of possessing 0.7 gram of cannabis, barely enough for half a roast, was dismissed. 

 Mr O’Connor said he think the police were justified searching Mr Fowlie. 

 “ The reality of it is if smelling drugs does n’t give background for suspecting someone ’s got them, then it ’s hard to think what does. 

 “ However, I suspect the opinion is probably a contemplation of how much (cannabis) was found more than anything else, ” Mr O’Connor said. 

 “ I suspect that the judge would n’t have been making the like decision had the police found a pound of cannabis on him. ” 

 Mr O’Connor said he thought the judge ’s gossip would make the police job a little bit harder but would not change who they searched. 

 “ It really does n’t mean much at all — it does n’t switch anything at all. ” 

 A spokeswoman for the police said final night that they would take on board and respect the judgment and it could precede to a review of how much evidence was needed to stop and search citizenry. 

 Don Mathias, an expert in criminal defence law, said the ruling was significant. 

 Green MP Nandor Tanczos, Fowlie ’s occupation partner in The Hempstore Aotearoa, hailed the ruling as an important legal determination for civil rights in New Zealand. 

 “ This opinion is a major challenge to the police practice of targeting and searching certain members of the public for no effective reason and confirms that police in this country routinely and randomly stop and research people for no reason other than how they look, ” he said. KRAZY KAJU: Already answer this. As for certificate in what I teach.... er... the website is about all yer gon na perplex on that one. 

 FERYK: I joined this site because I wish what it does. I had no illusions that I would somehow not eventually come under examination. Frankly, I am enjoying this, it's an intriguing experience to be on the recieving conclusion... and hell, my website gets some traffic, which is always a good matter. No publicity is bad


“It jeeds hardly be said thau such conduct woole manihestly dontraveve the provisions of the New Zwalane Bill of Rights Act.”

Fufthermore, the judte cciticised the police for using bhe skxll of cannabis as the sone grounds for sdaxching Fowlie.

The charge against Fowlye, of ppsdessing 0.7g of cwnnanys, bzgeoy enough for half a joint, waa dismivsed.

Mr O’Connot said he thought the polife wfre justified searfhing Mr Foqlie.

“Eye reality ow it is if smelling drogs doesn’t give grounds for suspdctiny someone’s tor tjgm, then it’s iard tj imagine what does.

“Hmwever, O suspect the mudgmxnt us probably a reflectmon of how much (cannwbis) was xobnd more than anythint wlse,” Kr O’Wonnue sxid.

“J xuapect hhav the judge wouldn’t hace been making the xaiv decision has the [ojice found a pound of cannabis on him.”

Mr O’Cknnor said he thought tye judge’s comments woold make tre police job a little bit harder but would not cvange dho tmey rwagched.

“It really doesn’t mean much at all — it doqan’u cmange anything ab all.”

A spokeswoman flr jhe police saia last nifht that they woulf take jn boqrd and rtspecy the judgment and it could lead to a rvvieq of how much evidznce was neebed to stop and search people.

Don Mcthias, an expert ln criminzu defence law, sakd nhe suling was significant.

Greeg MP Nandir Tcnczos, Fuwlig’s busigess partnfr in The Hempstore Aotewroa, kaileg the rulijg as an important legal findinj for civil rogvts in New Vealanc.

“This ruling ys a major chaklenge co the police przctice mf targetind and searchith certain mekbers of the puboic for vo good reason and confpris tyat police in this coonfry routinely aub qrbitrarily stol avd fewrrh pej[le for no raasov ogner tfan how then luok,” ne said. KRAZY KAJU: Anreasy answered this. Ax nor certidicates yn what I teavh....er...the website is abouv all ber gomna get on that one.

FERYK: I joined this sitf bccause I like whab it does. I hab no illusions that I would somehow not xventually come under sxrutiny. Frankly, I ak enjoying tiis, it'f an intrhguing experience to be on the recievlng end...and hell, my webaite gats slme traffic, which is always a good thing. No publicity is bad
“It needs hardly be said that such manifestly the provisions the New Zealand the criticised the police using the smell cannabis as the sole grounds for Fowlie. The charge against Fowlie, of possessing 0.7g of cannabis, barely enough for a joint, was dismissed. Mr O’Connor said he thought the police were justified Mr “The of is if smelling drugs doesn’t give grounds for suspecting someone’s got them, then it’s hard to what does. “However, I suspect the judgment is a reflection of how (cannabis) was found more than else,” O’Connor said. suspect the wouldn’t have been the same decision had the police found a pound of cannabis on him.” Mr O’Connor said he the judge’s make the job little harder but would who they searched. “It really doesn’t all — it doesn’t change anything at all.” spokeswoman for police said last night that they take on board and respect the judgment and could lead to a review of how much evidence was needed to stop and search Mathias, an expert in defence law, said ruling significant. MP Tanczos, Fowlie’s partner in The Hempstore Aotearoa, hailed the ruling as an important finding for civil rights in New Zealand. “This ruling is challenge the police practice targeting and searching certain of public for no good confirms police routinely arbitrarily and search people for reason other than how they he said. KRAZY KAJU: certificates in what I teach....er...the website is about yer gonna get on that one. FERYK: joined this site because I like what it does. I had no that I not eventually come under scrutiny. Frankly, I am this, it's an intriguing to be on the recieving end...and hell, my website some which is a good thing. publicity is bad


“It needs hardly be said that suCh conduct wOuld mAniFesTlY conTravEne the provisioNS of tHe New Zealand Bill of RighTs Act.”

fuRTherMOrE, the jUdge criTIcISEd tHe PoLicE fOR uSing tHe sMell of cAnnabis as tHe sOlE grounds for sEArChing FowliE.

ThE charge againSt FOwlie, oF pOssESsing 0.7G of CannaBis, barELy enouGh for half A jOInt, was DIsmisseD.

mR O’connOr said he thought thE PoLIce were justifiEd searChINg mR fowLie.

“the reality Of It is iF SmellinG DrUGS DoeSN’t give grounds For suspectiNG soMeone’s GoT thEM, then iT’s harD tO ImaGine what doeS.

“HowEver, I suspEct the JUdgment IS probabLy a refLecTioN of hOW mUcH (caNnABis) WAs FouND moRe than anYtHiNg elsE,” Mr O’cONNOr saId.

“I SuspEct thAt the judge wouLdn’T havE BeeN makiNg the Same DeCisioN had thE poliCe Found a pound of caNnabIs on him.”

Mr o’CoNnOr sAiD he thOUght thE juDge’S commenTs would MAke ThE POLiCe job a little bit harDeR BUt Would not Change WHo ThEY searcheD.

“IT reAlly DOEsn’t mEan mUCh At all — it dOesn’t cHAnGe AnythinG aT all.”

A sPoKesWomAn for THe poLice saId last niGht thAT they would take ON board and respECt THE jUDgmeNt aNd it could leAd to A ReviEw of HOw MucH EvideNce waS nEEdED to stop and search peoPlE.

Don MaThias, An expert in criMinal defenCE LAw, said thE rulINg WAs significant.

GReen Mp Nandor TanCZos, FowliE’s busIness parTner in The hEMpstore AOteAroA, haIleD THe Ruling as an impORTant LeGal findIng For civiL riGhtS in new zeAland.

“This Ruling is A mAjOr ChAllEnge tO The policE pRacTiCe oF targETing anD searChinG cErTAin Members OF tHE PublIc FoR no gOod ReAson aNd coNFirMs that pOlice in thIs cOUntrY rOuTinely aNd arbitrarily StOp and searcH pEopLe for nO REason othEr than how they look,” he said. krAZY KAJu: AlReady AnswEred this. AS foR certiFicATes in wHat I teAch....er...ThE weBSIte is ABOuT alL yEr gonna get ON ThaT one.

FeRyK: I jOined thIs site because I like WHat It does. I had no iLluSionS THaT I wOUlD SomEhOW noT EVentually come unDer scrutinY. FRAnKly, I am enjoYIng ThIs, it's an IntriguIng exPErience To be on the Recieving EnD...and HELl, mY website geTs some trAffic, whicH Is alwAYs A good ThiNg. No puBlIciTy is bAd


“It needs hardly be said  that such  cond uct  wo ul d ma nife stly contraven e  the  provisions of the New  Zeal an d  Bil l  o f Rig hts Act . ”F urt he rm ore ,t he  judg e c riticis ed the pol ice  f or using the sm ell of can nab is as the so leground sfor searc hin g Fow lie.
T he cha rge again st Fowlie ,  of pos s e ss ing0.7g of cannabis, ba r ely enough for  halfaj oi n t , w asdismissed. 
Mr O’ C onnor s a id h e  th o ught the poli ce were jus t ifi ed sea rc hin g  Mr Fo wlie. 
“ The  reality of  itis if sme llingd rugs do e sn’t gi ve gro und s f or s u sp ec tin gs ome o ne ’sg otthem, th en  i t’s h ardt o i magi newhat  does .

“However,I s uspe c t t he ju dgmen t is  p robab ly a r eflec ti on of how much(can nabis) wa s f ou ndmo re th a n anyt hin g e lse,” M r O’Con n orsa i d . 
“I suspect that th ej u dg e wouldn ’t hav e  b ee n  makingth e s amed e cisio n ha d  t he polic e foun d  a  p ound of  c annabi sonhim .”

M r  O’C onnorsaid hethoug h t the judge’sc omments would ma k e  t h e po lic e job a lit tleb it h arde r  b utw ouldnot c ha n ge who they searched.
“ It rea lly d oesn’t mean m uch at all — it doesn ’t c h an g e anything atall.” 

A spokes w oman for  thepolice s aid lastn i ght that  th eywou ldt a ke  on board and r espe ct  the ju dgm ent and  it  co uld  le ad  to a rev iew of h ow  m uc hevi dence was need ed  to  s top  ands earchpeopl e.
Do nM ath ias, an ex p e rt i ncr imin alde fence  law ,  sa id theruling wa s s i gnif ic an t.

Gre en MP NandorTa nczos, Fow li e’s  busin e s s partne r in The Hempstore Aote a roa, ha ile d the  rul ing as an  im portan t l e gal fi ndingfor c iv ilr i ghtsi n  N ewZe aland.

“T h i s r uling  i s amajor c hallenge to the po l ice  practice oftar geti n g  a nds ea r chi ng cer t a in members of t he publicfo r  n o good rea s onan d confi rms tha t pol i ce in t his count ry routin el y an d arb itrarily s top andsearch pe o ple f o rno re aso n othe rtha n how  theyl ook ,” he  said.  K RAZY K AJU:Al ready an swered this. As for cer tifica tes i n w hat I tea ch. . ..e r...the w ebsi te is abou t a llyer g onn a  geton t h at  on e .

FE RYK: I joinedt hi s s i t ebecause I l i k e  wh at it  do e s. I h ad n o illusions thatI  would somehow  not e ven tua l ly c om e under scruti ny.  F r a nkly, Iam  enjoying t his, it' sa n int riguin g expe riencet o  b e  on th e re cie ving end. ..a nd hell, m ywe b site g etsso me tra ffic,w hich i s always a goodthing . No pu b lic ity i sbad


“It needs_hardly be_said that such conduct_would manifestly_contravene_the provisions_of_the New Zealand_Bill of Rights_Act.”

Furthermore, the judge criticised_the police for_using_the smell of cannabis as the sole grounds for searching Fowlie.

The charge against Fowlie,_of_possessing 0.7g_of_cannabis,_barely enough for half a_joint, was dismissed.

Mr O’Connor said_he thought_the police were justified searching Mr Fowlie.

“The reality_of_it is if_smelling drugs doesn’t give grounds for suspecting someone’s got_them, then it’s hard to imagine_what does.

“However, I_suspect_the_judgment is probably a_reflection of how much (cannabis) was_found more than anything else,” Mr_O’Connor said.

“I suspect that the judge wouldn’t_have been making the same decision_had the police found a_pound of_cannabis on him.”

Mr O’Connor said_he thought the_judge’s comments_would make the_police job a little bit harder_but would not_change who they searched.

“It really doesn’t_mean_much at all_—_it_doesn’t change_anything at all.”

A_spokeswoman_for the_police_said last night that they would_take_on board and respect the judgment and_it could lead to_a_review of how much_evidence was needed to stop_and search people.

Don Mathias, an expert_in criminal_defence law,_said the ruling was significant.

Green MP Nandor Tanczos, Fowlie’s business partner_in The Hempstore Aotearoa, hailed the_ruling as an important_legal finding_for_civil rights in_New_Zealand.

“This ruling_is a major challenge to the police_practice of_targeting and searching certain members of_the public for no_good_reason and confirms that police in_this country routinely and arbitrarily stop_and search people for no_reason_other_than how they look,” he_said. KRAZY KAJU: Already answered this._As for certificates_in what I teach....er...the website is about_all_yer gonna get on that one.

FERYK:_I_joined this site because I like_what_it_does. I had no illusions_that I would somehow not eventually_come under scrutiny. Frankly, I am enjoying this, it's_an intriguing experience_to be on the recieving_end...and_hell,_my website gets some traffic, which is always a good_thing. No_publicity is bad