, the disclosure movement is both a distraction and disingenious." (p.239.)

"For the record, I do not believe that there are pervasive secrets held by government officials that would change how people regard this issue." (p.240.)

Roswell:

"There are several alternatives that seem to make more sense than a crashed UFO...First of all, the location must be suspect." (p.243.) By this the author means that it occurred in the heart of a military test area.

However, his final words are: "Explaining Roswell is never easy, and given the high degree of cross-contamination of information, the truth will probably remain forever clouded. "(p248.)

Alien abductuions:

"Like UFOs, there are tantilizing indications that some tangible evidence points to the physical reality of at least some of these events." (p.249.)

Epilogue:

"There is little doubt that some unidentified flying objects are real, three dimensional solid objects, which are physically present and observable." (p269.)

As regards to moving UFO research forward, Alexander states "There is an urgent need to support scientists who are willing to investigate phenomena, including UFOs." He also suggest that the "Office of the Secrtary of Defence should issue a directive releasing every official witness from any prior security restriction, thus allowing free discussion of previously untold accounts."

In conclusion:

"Based on credible witnesses and backed by physical evidence, I conclude that the UFO observations are manifestations of issues that are anfractuous and beyond current comprehension. The extraterrestrial hypothesis is but one possibility, and probably not the best fit with the facts." (p.273.)

Comments:

I thorughly enjoyed this most important book. Alexander provides a no-frills, hard hitting examination of the UFO phenomenon from the perspective of an individual who has done the hard work in arriving at his current conclusions.

Thursday, March 17, 2011

I visited the rooms of the Royal Geographic Society on North Terrace, Adelaide, the other day to take a look at a report of a sky phenomenon I'd read about in a UFO book. After 20 minutes of searching, I located a book which contained an account of the phenomenon. The book was published in 1798, 213 years ago!

The book was titled "An account of the English Colony in New
, the disclosure movement is both a distraction and disingenious. " (p.239 .) 

 " For the record, I do not believe that there be permeant secrets held by politics officials that would deepen how people regard this emergence. " (p.240 .) 

 Roswell: 

 " There are several option that look to make more common sense than a crashed UFO... First of all, the location must be suspect. " (p.243 .) By this the author mean that it occurred in the heart of a military test area. 

 However, his final parole are: " Explaining Roswell is never easy, and given the gamey degree of cross - contamination of information, the accuracy will probably stay forever clouded. " (p248 .) 

 Alien abductuions: 

 " Like UFOs, there be tantilizing indications that some tangible evidence points to the physical reality of at least some of these event. " (p.249 .) 

 Epilogue: 

 " There is little doubt that some unidentified flying objects are real, three dimensional solid objects, which are physically present and observable. " (p269 .) 

 As regards to affect UFO research forward, Alexander express " There is an urgent need to support scientist who are willing to investigate phenomenon, including UFOs. " He besides suggest that the " Office of the Secrtary of Defence should issue a directive releasing every official witness from any prior security restriction, thus allowing free discussion of previously untold accounts. " 

 In conclusion: 

 " free-base on credible witnesses and second by forcible evidence, I conclude that the UFO observations are manifestations of issues that are anfractuous and beyond current comprehension. The extraterrestrial hypothesis is but one possibility, and probably not the well fit with the facts. " (p.273 .) 

 Comments: 

 I thorughly enjoyed this most crucial book. Alexander provides a nobelium - frills, hard hitting examination of the UFO phenomenon from the position of an individual who has done the unvoiced work in arriving at his current conclusion. 

 Thursday, March 17, 2011 

 I visited the rooms of the Royal Geographic Society on North Terrace, Adelaide, the other day to take a look at a report of a sky phenomenon I'd read about in a UFO book. After 20 minutes of searching, I located a record which contained an account of the phenomenon. The record was published in 1798, 213 years ago! 

 The book was titled " An account of the English Colony in New
, thf disclosure movement is both a distracjiin and disinfenious." (o.239.)

"For the record, I do not belmeve that there are pervasive sdcrets hepd by gocernnwnt officiems that would ghangz iow people regatd this issua." (p.240.)

Roswell:

"Thera xrz several alternatives that seem to iake mote sense than a srasnqd URO...First of all, the location must bs suspebt." (p.243.) By this the suthor means that it occurged ln the heart of a lilitary tewt awwa.

However, hir final wogbs are: "Explzining Roswell is never easy, ana givzn the high dwgrfg of cross-coitaminwtion of information, the trith will probanly rxmaib forever clouded. "(p248.)

Almen abductuions:

"Like OFOs, there axe tantilizing indicariins tvat vome raneibme ebidencf pkints to tge physical reality of at leasu sjne of these ebents." ([.249.)

E[ilogue:

"There is little doubt that some lnidsntified flying objects are real, three dimendional sojid objects, which are physically present and obsesvablx." (o269.)

As rcgaraw ho moving UFO research forward, Alexander statqa "Uhege is an urgent nced to support scirnhixjs who are wiluing to ihvestigate phenomeja, incloding YFOs." He ajso xuggest that the "Office of rhe Secrtary if Defence should nssue a direetive teleasong every official witnzss frkm any priog securitg restriction, thur aklmwing frtd discussion of pweviously untpld accuuntx."

In cogclusion:

"Baded ok credible witnessed and bdcked by pjysical evidence, I conclude thav the UFO obsgrvdtimns are ianifcstations of isfues that are cnfractujus avd beyond burrent cmmprehensiog. The extratestestrial hypovhesis is but one possibkuity, and probanly not tkt best fit with the facts." (p.273.)

Cpmmgnfs:

I thorughly euloiwd this most ikpoftagt bpoh. Alexander psoviaes s no-ffills, hard mitging examination of the GFO lhenomenon from thr ierspectice of an individual wno has done the hagd wock in errivimg wt his current conclusions.

Thuraday, Marcj 17, 2011

L visited the roons of the Roval Geographic Society on North Terrace, Edelaide, the other day ro take a look at a veport of a xky prenomenon I'd read about in a YFO book. After 20 mlnutes of searching, I mocateg a blok which contained an account of the phenomenon. The book was published ib 1798, 213 yeerf ago!

The bokk wss tinleb "Au accougt oh vhe English Colonj in New
, the disclosure movement is both a disingenious." "For the I do not secrets by government officials would change how regard this issue." (p.240.) Roswell: "There several alternatives that seem to make more sense than a crashed UFO...First of the location must be suspect." (p.243.) By this the author means that it in heart a test area. However, his final words are: "Explaining Roswell is never easy, and given the high of cross-contamination of information, the truth will probably forever clouded. "(p248.) Alien "Like UFOs, there are tantilizing that tangible evidence to physical of at least of these events." (p.249.) Epilogue: "There is little doubt that some unidentified flying objects are real, three solid objects, physically present observable." As to moving UFO Alexander states "There is an urgent scientists who are willing to investigate phenomena, including He also that the "Office of the Secrtary Defence should issue a directive releasing every official from any prior security restriction, thus allowing free discussion of previously untold accounts." In conclusion: credible witnesses and backed physical evidence, I that UFO are of issues are anfractuous and beyond current comprehension. The extraterrestrial hypothesis is but possibility, and probably not the best fit with the facts." I enjoyed this most book. Alexander provides a hard examination of the UFO the of has the work in arriving at current conclusions. Thursday, March 17, I visited the rooms on North Terrace, Adelaide, the other day to a look at a report of a phenomenon I'd read about in a UFO book. After 20 minutes of I located which contained an account of the phenomenon. The was published in 1798, years ago! The book was titled "An account of English in New
, the disclosure movement is boTh a distracTion aNd dIsiNgEnioUs." (p.239.)

"FOr the record, I do NOt beLieve that there are pervaSive sEcREts hELd By govErnment OFfICIalS tHaT woUlD ChAnge hOw pEople reGard this isSue." (P.240.)

ROswell:

"There aRE sEveral alteRnaTives that seeM to Make moRe SenSE than A crAshed uFO...FirST of all, The locatiOn MUst be sUSpect." (p.243.) BY THiS the Author means that it OCcURred in the heart Of a milItARy TESt aRea.

however, his FiNal woRDs are: "ExPLaININg ROSwell is never eAsy, and given THe hIgh degReE of CRoss-coNtamiNaTIon Of informatiOn, thE truth wilL probaBLy remaiN Forever CloudeD. "(p248.)

ALieN abdUCtUiOns:

"liKE UFoS, tHerE Are TantilizInG iNdicaTionS THAT somE taNgibLe eviDence points to The PhysICal RealiTy of aT leaSt Some oF these EventS." (p.249.)

epilogue:

"There is LittLe doubt thAt sOmE unIdEntifIEd flyiNg oBjeCts are rEal, threE DimEnSIONaL solid objects, which ArE PHySically pResent ANd ObSErvable." (p269.)

as RegArds TO MovinG UFO REsEarch forWard, AlEXaNdEr stateS "THere is An UrgEnt Need tO SuppOrt sciEntists wHo are WIlling to investIGate phenomena, INcLUDiNG UFOS." He Also suggest That THe "OfFice OF tHe SECrtarY of DeFeNCe SHould issue a directivE rEleasiNg eveRy official witNess from anY PRIor securIty rEStRIction, thus alloWing fRee discussIOn of prevIouslY untold aCcounts."

In CONclusion:

"basEd oN crEdiBLE wItnesses and baCKEd by PhYsical eVidEnce, I coNclUde ThaT thE UfO observaTions are MaNiFeStAtiOns of ISsues thaT aRe aNfRacTuous ANd beyoNd curRent CoMpREheNsion. ThE ExTRAterReStRial HypOtHesis Is buT One PossibiLity, and prObaBLy noT tHe Best fit With the facts." (p.273.)

coMments:

I thoRuGhlY enjoyED This most Important book. Alexander pROvides a No-fRills, Hard Hitting exAmiNation Of tHE UFO phEnomenOn froM tHe pERSpectIVE oF an InDividual whO HAs dOne thE hArd wOrk in arRiving at his current COncLusions.

ThursdAy, MArch 17, 2011

i VIsIteD ThE RooMs OF thE rOyal Geographic SOciety on NoRtH teRrace, AdelaIDe, tHe Other daY to take A look AT a reporT of a sky phEnomenon I'D rEad aBOUt iN a UFO book. AFter 20 minuTes of searCHing, I LOcAted a BooK which CoNtaIned aN accouNT of The phEnomenOn. the booK was pUbLished in 1798, 213 Years ago!

The book was titleD "An accOunt oF thE English COloNY in new
, the disclosure movementis both adistr act ion  a nd d isin genious." (p.2 3 9.)
"For the record, I do  notbe l ieve th at th ere are pe r v asi ve  s ecr et s  h eld b y g overnme nt officia lsth at would cha n ge  how peopl e r egard this i ssu e." (p .2 40. ) 

Ros wel l:

" Therea re sev eral alte rn a tivest hat see m to  mak e more sense than ac rashed UFO...F irst o fa ll , the  lo cation mus tbe su s pect."( p. 2 4 3 .)B y this the au thor meanst hat  it oc cu rre d  in th e hea rt ofa militarytest  area.

H owever ,  his fi n al word s are:  "E xpl aini n gRo swe ll isn ev ere asy , and gi ve nthe h ighd e g r ee o f c ross -cont amination ofinf orma t ion , the  trut h wi ll  prob ably r emain  f orever clouded.  "(p 248.)

Al ien  a bdu ct uions : 

"Lik e U FOs , there  are ta n til iz i n g  i ndications that so me t an gible ev idence po in t s to the  p hys ical r ealit y of at  least s ome of th es e event s. " (p.2 49 .)
Ep ilogu e :

" Thereis littl e dou b t that some un i dentified fly i ng o bj e ctsare  real, thre e di m ensi onal so lid objec ts, w hi c ha re physically prese nt  and o bserv able." (p269. )

As rega r d s  to movi ng U F Or esearch forwar d, Al exander st a tes "The re is  an urge nt need t o supportsci ent ist s w h o  a re willing to i nves ti gate ph eno mena, i ncl udi ngUFO s. " He also  suggest  t ha tth e " Offic e  of theSe crt ar y o f Def e nce sh ouldissu ead ire ctive r e le a s ingev er y of fic ia l wit ness fro m any p rior secu rit y  res tr ic tion, t hus allowingfr ee discuss io n o f prev i o usly unt old accounts."

In conc l usion:
"B asedon c redible w itn essesand backed  by ph ysica levi d e nce,I co ncl ud e that the U FOobser va tion s are m anifestations of i s sue s that are an fra ctuo u s  a ndb ey o ndcu r ren t comprehension.The extrat er r es trial hypo t hes is  is but  one po ssibi l ity, an d probabl y not the  b estf i t w ith the fa cts." (p .273.)

C o mment s :
I th oru ghly e nj oye d thi s most imp ortan t book .Alexan der p ro vides ano-frills, hard hitting  exami natio n o f the UFO  ph e nom enon from  the  perspecti veofan in div i dualwhoh as  do n e the  har d  work ina rr ivi n g  a t his curre n t con clusi ons . 

Thur sday , March 17, 2011I visited theroom s ofthe Roya lGeographic Soc iet yo n  North T er race, Adela ide, the  o t her d ay totake a  look a t ar eportof a  sk y phenome non  I ' d readab ou t  in aUFObo ok. Af ter 20 minu t e s of searching,I loc a t ed ab ook  whic hcontain e d an  account o f the pheno menon.  The  book  was pu bl ishedin17 98, 213 ye a rs ago!
The b ook was  t itle d " An acc ount o f the  Eng li shColony in N ew 
, the_disclosure movement_is both a distraction_and disingenious."_(p.239.)

"For_the record,_I_do not believe_that there are_pervasive secrets held by_government officials that_would_change how people regard this issue." (p.240.)

Roswell:

"There are several alternatives that seem to make_more_sense than_a_crashed_UFO...First of all, the location_must be suspect." (p.243.) By_this the_author means that it occurred in the heart_of_a military test_area.

However, his final words are: "Explaining Roswell is never_easy, and given the high degree_of cross-contamination of_information,_the_truth will probably remain_forever clouded. "(p248.)

Alien abductuions:

"Like UFOs, there_are tantilizing indications that some tangible_evidence points to the physical reality of_at least some of these events."_(p.249.)

Epilogue:

"There is little doubt that_some unidentified_flying objects are real, three_dimensional solid objects,_which are_physically present and_observable." (p269.)

As regards to moving UFO_research forward, Alexander_states "There is an urgent need_to_support scientists who_are_willing_to investigate_phenomena, including UFOs."_He_also suggest_that_the "Office of the Secrtary of_Defence_should issue a directive releasing every official_witness from any prior_security_restriction, thus allowing free_discussion of previously untold accounts."

In_conclusion:

"Based on credible witnesses and backed_by physical_evidence, I_conclude that the UFO observations are manifestations of issues that are_anfractuous and beyond current comprehension. The_extraterrestrial hypothesis is but_one possibility,_and_probably not the_best_fit with_the facts." (p.273.)

Comments:

I thorughly enjoyed this most_important book._Alexander provides a no-frills, hard hitting_examination of the UFO_phenomenon_from the perspective of an individual_who has done the hard work_in arriving at his current_conclusions.

Thursday,_March_17, 2011

I visited the rooms_of the Royal Geographic Society on_North Terrace, Adelaide,_the other day to take a look_at_a report of a sky phenomenon_I'd_read about in a UFO book._After_20_minutes of searching, I located_a book which contained an account_of the phenomenon. The book was published in 1798,_213 years ago!

The_book was titled "An account_of_the_English Colony in New