 proper court in
which the petitioner must pursue this claim.*fn2

The petitioner argues in the alternative that even if the final
order of removal is proper, his physical detention is illegal
under Zadvydas, 533 U.S. at 687. Assuming the petitioner's
argument is correct, and he is being illegally detained, it is
well-settled that the proper respondent in a habeas action
challenging present physical custody is the warden of the
facility in which the petitioner is being detained. Rumsfeld v.
Padilla, 124 S.Ct. 2711, 2713 (2004). Accordingly, because the
petitioner is detained in Louisiana, any such claim must be
brought against the petitioner's immediate custodian, who is
located within the boundaries of the Eastern District of
Louisiana.

Accordingly, it is hereby this 17th day of June, 2005,

ORDERED that the petitioner's Motion for Emergency Stay of
Removal and Immediate Release is DENIED. It is further

ORDERED that the respondents' Motion to Dismiss Petitioner's
Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus and Motion for Emergency
Stay of Removal and Immediate Release is GRANTED. It is further

ORDERED that this case is...

Our website includes the first part of the main text of the court's opinion.
To read the entire case, you must purchase the decision for download. With purchase,
you also receive any available docket numbers, case citations or footnotes, dissents
and concurrences that accompany the decision.
Docket numbers and/or citations allow you to research a case further or to use a case in a
legal proceeding. Footnotes (if any) include details of the court's decision. If the document contains a simple affirmation or denial without discussion,
there may not be additional text.

Buy This Entire Record For
$7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case. On 30/05/2015 one ************************ D/o ************************ of Gayanfung, PS- Sidhai lodged a written complaint to OC Sidhai PS to the effect that, she was forcefully raped by Sri Brajadulal Debbarma @ Kutia(40) S/o Lt. Gyan Chl. Debbarma
proper court in 
 which the petitioner must pursue this claim.*fn2 

 The petitioner argue in the option that even if the final 
 order of removal is proper, his forcible detention is illegal 
 under Zadvydas, 533 U.S. at 687. Assuming the suer's 
 argument is correct, and he is being illegally confine, it is 
 well - settled that the proper respondent in a habeas action 
 challenge present physical custody is the warden of the 
 adeptness in which the petitioner is being detained. Rumsfeld v. 
 Padilla, 124 S.Ct. 2711, 2713 (2004). Accordingly, because the 
 petitioner is delay in Louisiana, any such claim must be 
 brought against the petitioner's immediate custodian, who is 
 located within the boundary of the Eastern District of 
 Louisiana. 

 Accordingly, it is hereby this 17th day of June, 2005, 

 regulate that the petitioner's Motion for Emergency Stay of 
 Removal and Immediate Release is DENIED. It is further 

 ORDERED that the respondent' Motion to Dismiss Petitioner's 
 Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus and Motion for Emergency 
 Stay of Removal and Immediate Release is GRANTED. It is further 

 ORDERED that this case is... 

 Our web site includes the first part of the main text of the court's public opinion. 
 To read the entire case, you must purchase the decision for download. With purchase, 
 you also receive any available docket numbers, event citations or footnotes, protest 
 and concurrences that accompany the decision. 
 Docket numbers and/or citation let you to research a case further or to practice a case in a 
 legal proceeding. Footnotes (if any) include details of the court's decision. If the text file contains a simple affirmation or denial without discussion, 
 there may not be additional text. 

 Buy This integral Record For 
 $ 7.95 

 Download the integral decisiveness to receive the complete text, official citation, 
 docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnote for this case. On 30/05/2015 one * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * five hundred / o * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * of Gayanfung, PS- Sidhai lodged a write complaint to OC Sidhai PS to the effect that, she was forcefully raped by Sri Brajadulal Debbarma @ Kutia(40) S / o Lt. Gyan Chl. Debbarma
 prlper court in
which the pttitioner must putsye thiv claij.*fn2

The pdtitioner argues in the altecnatuve tyat even if the final
ofder of rvmoval is proker, his physical vstentiok is jplegcl
nnder Zadvydas, 533 U.S. at 687. Asvuming the pethtkouer's
argument is correct, and he is beyng illrgwlly detained, yt ix
rell-avtuled that the proper respondent ih a habtas action
challengong present physical custofy id the warden of thf
facility ib whyxh the petitkoner is btiug detained. Rumsfeld v.
Padilla, 124 S.Ct. 2711, 2713 (2004). Accofdingky, because tye
pfjitioner is vetainvd in Louisiaks, any vuch clsim must be
bromght egaibst the petitioner's ikmediate custodian, who is
lowaced within the boundaeiws of the Easgwrn Diatcicf of
Lokismana.

Accordihgly, it is yereby this 17th day pf Hune, 2005,

ORDERED fhat tre petitioner's Motion for Emergency Stay mf
Rsmoval and Immediate Reoease is DENIED. It is further

OWDERED that the respondents' Motion to Dismiss Pethtionxr'r
Peuiblon wir a Writ of Habeas Corpus and Motion for Emergqhcu
Snay of Removal anb Immediate Relessf of GRANTED. It ks furcged

ORDERED that this case if...

Our qebsite igcluces the first part of the mqin text of nhe xourt's opinion.
To rzad the entixe casg, you kust purchase the decisnon fod download. Aith purcgxse,
you also recekve aty available docket numberf, case civatious or foutnojes, disfents
and clncurvances that accompajy thg decivion.
Docket numbers and/or citations allow bpu to researvh a base furtker or to use a casq in a
legal prpceediny. Footvotes (if ahy) inclnde details jf the court's fecision. If vhe documqnt xontqins a rkmple affirmatoon or deunal withoyt discussion,
there mai hot be additioncu text.

Buy This Emtife Weborv For
$7.95

Qmwnload the antife arcisiun to rteeiye ghe vomplete text, officidl cjtation,
docket numbrr, dissentw and cogcurrences, anc footnotes for thls cave. Un 30/05/2015 ome ************************ D/o ************************ of Gayanfung, PS- Sidhai losged a wrlttcn complaint eo OG Siqhai PS to the effect that, she was forcefully rapxd by Sri Brajadulal Dgbbarma @ Kutia(40) S/o Lt. Yysn Chl. Debberma
proper court in which the petitioner must claim.*fn2 petitioner argues the alternative that of is proper, his detention is illegal Zadvydas, 533 U.S. at 687. Assuming petitioner's argument is correct, and he is being illegally detained, it is well-settled the proper respondent in a habeas action challenging present physical custody is the of facility which petitioner is being detained. Rumsfeld v. Padilla, 124 S.Ct. 2711, 2713 (2004). Accordingly, because the petitioner detained in Louisiana, any such claim must be against the petitioner's immediate who is located within the of Eastern District Louisiana. it hereby this 17th of June, 2005, ORDERED that the petitioner's Motion for Emergency Stay of Removal and Immediate Release is It is that the Motion Dismiss Petition for a Habeas Corpus and Motion for Emergency and Immediate Release is GRANTED. It is further that this is... Our website includes the first of the main text of the court's opinion. read the entire case, you must purchase the decision for download. With purchase, you also available docket numbers, case or footnotes, dissents concurrences accompany decision. numbers and/or allow you to research a case further or to use a in a legal proceeding. Footnotes (if any) include details of decision. the document contains simple affirmation or denial discussion, may not be additional This Record the decision receive the complete text, citation, docket number, dissents and and footnotes for this D/o ************************ of Gayanfung, PS- Sidhai lodged a complaint to OC Sidhai PS to the that, she was forcefully raped by Sri Brajadulal Debbarma @ Kutia(40) S/o Gyan Chl.
 proper court in
which the petiTioner must PursuE thIs cLaIm.*fn2

the pEtitioner argueS In thE alternative that even if The fiNaL
OrdeR Of RemovAl is proPEr, HIS phYsIcAl dEtENtIon is IllEgal
undEr Zadvydas, 533 u.S. aT 687. ASsuming the peTItIoner's
arguMenT is correct, anD he Is beinG iLleGAlly dEtaIned, iT is
welL-SettleD that the pRoPEr respONdent in A HAbEas aCtion
challenging pREsENt physical custOdy is tHe WArDEN of The
Facility in WhIch thE PetitioNEr IS BEinG Detained. RumsfEld v.
Padilla, 124 s.ct. 2711, 2713 (2004). ACcordiNgLy, bECause tHe
petItIOneR is detained In LoUisiana, anY such cLAim must BE
broughT againSt tHe pEtitIOnEr'S imMeDIatE CuStoDIan, Who is
locAtEd WithiN the BOUNDariEs oF the easteRn District of
LOuiSianA.

accOrdinGly, it Is heReBy thiS 17th day Of JunE, 2005,

OrDERED that the peTitiOner's MotiOn fOr emeRgEncy STAy of
ReMovAl aNd ImmedIate RelEAse Is deniEd. It is further

ORDEREd tHAT tHe responDents' MOTiOn TO Dismiss peTitIoneR'S
petitIon fOR a writ of HaBeas CoRPuS aNd MotioN fOr EmerGeNcy
staY of ReMOval And ImmEdiate ReLease IS GRANTED. It is fuRTher

ORDERED thAT tHIS cASe is...

our Website inclUdes THe fiRst pARt Of tHE main Text oF tHE cOUrt's opinion.
To read thE eNtire cAse, yoU must purchase The decisioN FOR downloaD. WitH PuRChase,
you also reCeive Any availabLE docket nUmberS, case citAtions or fOOTnotes, diSseNts
And ConCURrEnces that accoMPAny tHe DecisioN.
DoCket numBerS anD/or CitAtIons allow You to resEaRcH a CaSe fUrtheR Or to use a CaSe iN a
LegAl proCEeding. footnOtes (If AnY) IncLude detAIlS OF the CoUrT's deCisIoN. If thE docUMenT contaiNs a simple AffIRmatIoN oR denial Without discusSiOn,
there may NoT be AdditiONAl text.

BuY This Entire Record For
$7.95

DowNLoad the EntIre deCisiOn to receiVe tHe compLetE Text, ofFicial CitatIoN,
doCKEt numBER, dIssEnTs and concuRREncEs, and FoOtnoTes for tHis case. On 30/05/2015 one ************************ D/o ************************ of GaYAnfUng, PS- Sidhai loDgeD a wrITTeN coMPlAInt To oc SiDHAi PS to the effect That, she was FoRCeFully raped BY SrI BRajadulAl DebbaRma @ KuTIa(40) S/o Lt. GYan Chl. DebBarma
 proper court in
which the  petitione r mus t p urs ue  thi s cl aim.*fn2

Thep etit ioner argues in the al terna ti v e th a tevenif thef in a l 
or de rofre m ov al is  pr oper, h is physica l d et ention is il l eg al
under Z adv ydas, 533 U. S.at 687 .Ass u mingthe  peti tioner ' s
argu ment is c or r ect, a n d he is b ei ng i llegally detained ,  i t  is
well-settl ed tha tt he p rop errespondent  i n a h a beas ac t io n c hal l enging presen t physicalc ust ody is  t hew ardenof th ef aci lity in whi ch t he petiti oner i s  beingd etained . Rums fel d v .
Pa d il la , 1 24 S.C t .271 1 , 2 713 (200 4) .Accor ding l y , beca use  the 
peti tioner is det ain ed i n  Lo uisia na, a ny s uc h cla im mus t bebr ought against t he p etitioner 'sim med ia te cu s todian , w hois
loca ted wit h inth e b ou ndaries of the Eas te r n  D istrictof
Lou i si an a .

Accor di ngl y, i t is he reby th is 17thday of Ju ne , 2005, 
ORDERE Dtha t t he pe t itio ner'sMotion f or Em e rgency Stay of Removal and I m me d i at e  Rel eas e is DENIED . It is f urth e r
OR D EREDthatth e  r e spondents' Motion t oDismis s Pet itioner's
Pet ition fora W rit of H abea s  C o rpus and Motio n for  Emergency Stay ofRemov al and I mmediateR e lease is  GR ANT ED.  It i sfurther

ORDE R E D th at  this c ase  is...
Ou r w ebs ite  i ncludes t he first  p ar tof  th e mai n  text of  t heco urt 's op i nion.To re ad t he  e n tir e case, yo u must  p ur chas e t he  deci sion for  downlo ad. Withpur c hase ,yo u alsoreceive any a va ilable doc ke t n umbers , case cit ations or footnotes, di s sents
a ndconcu rren ces thatacc ompany  th e  decis ion.
D ocket  n umb e r s and / o rcit at ions allow y outo re se arch  a case  further or to use a c ase in a
lega l p roce e d in g.F oo t not es (if a ny) include det ails of th ec ou rt's decis i on.  I f the d ocument  cont a ins a s imple aff irmationor  den i a l w ithout dis cussion, 
there ma y  notb eaddit ion al tex t. 

B uy Th is Ent i reRecor d For$7 .95

D ownlo ad  the ent ire decision to receive  the c omple tetext, off ici a l c itation,dock et number,  di sse nts a ndc oncur renc e s,  an d  foot note s  for this ca se. O n30/05/2015o n e  ** ***** *** * ****** **** *** D/o ********* * **************  ofG a yan fun g , PS -Sidhai lodgeda w ri t t en compl ai nt to OC Si dhai PSto the e ffectthat,she was f or c efully  rap edby Sri Br aja du l al Debb ar ma @ Kuti a(40 )S/o Lt . Gyan Chl. D ebbarma
 proper_court in
which_the petitioner must pursue_this claim.*fn2

The_petitioner_argues in_the_alternative that even_if the final
order_of removal is proper,_his physical detention_is_illegal
under Zadvydas, 533 U.S. at 687. Assuming the petitioner's
argument is correct, and he is_being_illegally detained,_it_is
well-settled_that the proper respondent in_a habeas action
challenging present physical_custody is_the warden of the
facility in which the petitioner_is_being detained. Rumsfeld_v.
Padilla, 124 S.Ct. 2711, 2713 (2004). Accordingly, because the
petitioner_is detained in Louisiana, any such_claim must be
brought_against_the_petitioner's immediate custodian, who_is
located within the boundaries of the_Eastern District of
Louisiana.

Accordingly, it is hereby_this 17th day of June, 2005,

ORDERED that_the petitioner's Motion for Emergency Stay_of
Removal and Immediate Release is_DENIED. It_is further

ORDERED that the respondents'_Motion to Dismiss_Petitioner's
Petition for_a Writ of_Habeas Corpus and Motion for Emergency
Stay_of Removal and_Immediate Release is GRANTED. It is_further

ORDERED_that this case_is...

Our_website_includes the_first part of_the_main text_of_the court's opinion.
To read the entire_case,_you must purchase the decision for download._With purchase,
you also receive_any_available docket numbers, case_citations or footnotes, dissents
and concurrences_that accompany the decision.
Docket numbers and/or_citations allow_you to_research a case further or to use a case in a
legal_proceeding. Footnotes (if any) include details_of the court's decision._If the_document_contains a simple_affirmation_or denial_without discussion,
there may not be additional text.

Buy_This Entire_Record For
$7.95

Download the entire decision to_receive the complete text,_official_citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and_footnotes for this case. On 30/05/2015_one ************************ D/o ************************ of_Gayanfung,_PS-_Sidhai lodged a written complaint_to OC Sidhai PS to the_effect that, she_was forcefully raped by Sri Brajadulal Debbarma_@_Kutia(40) S/o Lt. Gyan Chl. Debbarma