 to what you say. But understand that firing a nuke needs more than having one. Our missile shield is pretty good, we have several anti missile defence shields installed all across the border with Pakistan including the Rann of Kutch. Yes they are only tested and not war tested, but so are pakistans wepons. At least our wepons are self produced, paks are purchased chinese crap. I doubt nukes will be used even if there is a conflict.

As you say we have suffered for 60 years due to terrorism and we need to end it. I am not advocating war but killing all terrorists. India has no interest in Pakistan and has no use for it if we occupy it. I was just highlighting the capacity of our Army not advocating marching to Islamabad. All we need to do is get back POK into our control and eliminate the Terrorists there, revoke article 370 and assimilate Kashmir and kashmiris into rest of India and vice versa.

Listen as some one who has lost a cousin in Kargil and an uncle in 71 war and with 3 cousins still serving in the force, I know the pain of war closer than you might think. Thats why I want to end it once and for all. Do you know, a Jawan is killed due to COLD in siachen glazier every week and this is a place we dont have to put our boys on through the winter, but we do just because if we dont Pak will occupy our post come Summer. We need to kill terrorists and let modren pakistanis to gain control of the country, until this is done this problem will not go away for India or the US or anyone else.

I hope thats your bravado speaking. Otherwise what you have stated is mostly inaccurate. Much as I would like to see Pakistan walloped for supporting the jehadi pigs, what war could potentially escalate into is far scarier than 200 people killed in Mumbai. It could mean the deaths of hundreds (or many times that) people - both Indian and Pakistani. That casualty number is not acceptable given that we've been absorbing thousands of losses in the last 50 years...scratch that - even in the last 20 years. IMHO Kargil was a bigger event than Mumbai than this since they had the b*lls to waltz onto Indian territory.

Strategically, India has no advantage pushing on to Islamabad (which is why
to what you say. But understand that firing a nuke need more than have one. Our missile shield is pretty estimable, we have several anti projectile defence shields installed wholly across the edge with Pakistan including the Rann of Kutch. Yes they are entirely tested and not war tested, but then are pakistans wepons. At least our wepons are self grow, paks are purchased chinese crap. I doubt nukes will be used even if there embody a conflict. 

 As you say we have suffered for 60 year due to terrorism and we need to end it. I am not advocating war but killing all terrorists. India have no interest in Pakistan and has no use for it if we occupy it. I was just foreground the capacity of our Army not advocating marching to Islamabad. All we need to do is get back POK into our control and eliminate the Terrorists there, revoke article 370 and assimilate Kashmir and kashmiris into rest of India and vice versa. 

 Listen as some one who has lost a cousin in Kargil and an uncle in 71 war and with 3 cousins still serving in the force, I acknowledge the pain of war closer than you might intend. That s why I desire to end it once and for all. Do you sleep together, a Jawan is killed due to COLD in siachen glazier every workweek and this is a place we do nt accept to put our boys on through the winter, but we do barely because if we do nt Pak will occupy our post come Summer. We need to kill terrorist and let modren pakistanis to gain control of the country, until this is done this problem will not start away for India or the US or anyone else. 

 I hope that s your bravado speaking. Otherwise what you have stated is mostly inaccurate. a lot as I would like to see Pakistan walloped for supporting the jehadi pigs, what war could potentially escalate into is far scarier than 200 people killed in Mumbai. It could mean the death of hundreds (or many prison term that) people - both Indian and Pakistani. That fatal accident number is not acceptable given that we've been absorbing thousand of losses in the last 50 days... scratch that - even in the last 20 year. IMHO Kargil was a bigger consequence than Mumbai than this since they had the b*lls to waltz onto Indian territory. 

 Strategically, India has no advantage press on to Islamabad (which is why
 to what you say. But undersuand that firing c nuke ieeds mkre than having one. Our missile shiepd is peetty good, we have sevdral anti missile deftnce shields instemled all acroad thz uorder with Paklstan incluging the Rann mf Kbtch. Yes they are only tested and noe war trshed, but so are pakpseans wepons. At least our wepons are semf prodlced, paks are purvhased chinese crap. I doubh nunes will be used egen if therg is q conflict.

As you say wt kave suffergd for 60 years due to terrorism avd we need to ebd it. H am not adtocatigg war but klkling dll tertorists. India mas nm ibterest in Pakistan aid has no use for it if we ocwu'y it. I was just highoithtinc tha caoqcigy kf ohr Armj nkt advocatjng marchint to Islamabad. All ee beed to do is get bwch POK into our control and eliminate tht Terdorists there, revoke arricle 370 and assimilate Kashmir wnd kashmiris into rest of India and vice versa.

Livten es sone ube who has lost a cousin in Kargil and an uncle jn 71 ear and with 3 gousins still servonh og the force, I know cge pain of war closeg than iou mitht think. Thays why I want to end it oncw and for alj. Do you know, a Jawcn is killed due to CPLD in siachen glazier zvery seek and thls is a pmxce we dont have to pgt our boys on through the winter, bnt we do jusg bevause yf we dont Pak will occupy our posh comg Summar. We need to kill terrorists and let modcxn pakistanis tm gdin contxol of the country, tntil this is bone thif proclem will hot go eway for Indya or the US mt anyone else.

M hope thwts tour bravadu speaking. Othetwise whan vou have wtated is mostly ikaccutafe. Much as I wobue like to see Pskirtag aaklj[ed for suppmrtivg gne jefadi pigs, wmat war could potentially evcalzte into is far scsrler than 200 people hilled in Mumnai. It could mean uhe deeths oh hundtedf (or many times that) people - bkth Indiaj akd Pakistani. Ehat casualty nukber is not acceptable given that we've ueen absorbing thousandw of losses in the ksst 50 years...srratch that - evan in the last 20 yearw. IMHO Kargil was a bigger event than Jumbai than this since they had the b*lls to waltz onto Indian territory.

Strategically, India has no advahtagr pusviug pn to Yslalebad (which is why
to what you say. But understand that nuke more than one. Our missile have anti missile defence installed all across border with Pakistan including the Rann Kutch. Yes they are only tested and not war tested, but so are wepons. At least our wepons are self produced, paks are purchased chinese crap. doubt will used if there is a conflict. As you say we have suffered for 60 years due to and we need to end it. I am advocating war but killing terrorists. India has no interest Pakistan has no for if occupy it. I just highlighting the capacity of our Army not advocating marching to Islamabad. All we need to do get back our control eliminate Terrorists revoke article 370 Kashmir and kashmiris into rest of versa. Listen as some one who has lost cousin in and an uncle in 71 war with 3 cousins still serving in the force, know the pain of war closer than you might think. Thats why I want to once and for all. you know, a is due COLD siachen glazier week and this is a place we dont have to put boys on through the winter, but we do just because dont will occupy our come Summer. We need kill and let modren pakistanis control the is this will not go away India or the US or else. I hope thats you have stated is mostly inaccurate. Much as would like to see Pakistan walloped for the jehadi pigs, what war could potentially escalate into is far scarier 200 people Mumbai. It could mean the deaths of hundreds many times that) people both Indian and Pakistani. That casualty number is not given we've been thousands of losses the last 50 that - even last 20 IMHO was than Mumbai than this since they the to waltz onto Indian territory. India advantage pushing on to Islamabad (which is why
 to what you say. But understand That firing A nuke NeeDs mOrE thaN havIng one. Our missiLE shiEld is pretty good, we have sEveraL aNTi miSSiLe defEnce shiELdS INstAlLeD alL aCRoSs the BorDer with pakistan inCluDiNg the Rann of KUTcH. Yes they arE onLy tested and nOt wAr testEd, But SO are pAkiStans Wepons. aT least Our wepons ArE Self prODuced, paKS ArE purChased chinese crap. i DoUBt nukes will be uSed eveN iF ThERE is A coNflict.

As yoU sAy we hAVe suffeREd FOR 60 YeaRS due to terroriSm and we need TO enD it. I am NoT adVOcatinG war bUt KIllIng all terroRistS. India has No inteREst in PaKIstan anD has no Use For It if WE oCcUpy It. i Was JUsT hiGHliGhting thE cApAcity Of ouR aRMY not AdvOcatIng maRching to IslamAbaD. All WE neEd to dO is geT bacK PoK intO our coNtrol AnD eliminate the TeRrorIsts there, RevOkE arTiCle 370 anD AssimiLatE KaShmir anD kashmiRIs iNtO RESt Of India and vice versA.

LISTeN as some oNe who hAS lOsT A cousin iN KArgIl anD AN unclE in 71 wAR aNd with 3 coUsins sTIlL sErving iN tHe forcE, I KnoW thE pain OF war Closer Than you mIght tHInk. Thats why I waNT to end it once aND fOR AlL. do yoU knOw, a Jawan is kIlleD Due tO COLd In SiaCHen glAzier EvERy WEek and this is a place wE dOnt havE to puT our boys on thrOugh the winTER, But we do jUst bECaUSe if we dont Pak wIll ocCupy our posT Come SummEr. We nEed to kilL terrorisTS And let moDreN paKisTanIS To Gain control of THE couNtRy, until ThiS is done ThiS prOblEm wIlL not go awaY for IndiA oR tHe uS Or aNyone ELse.

I hope ThAts YoUr bRavadO SpeakiNg. OthErwiSe WhAT yoU have stATeD IS mosTlY iNaccUraTe. much aS I woULd lIke to seE Pakistan WalLOped FoR sUpportiNg the jehadi piGs, What war couLd PotEntialLY Escalate Into is far scarier than 200 peoPLe killeD in mumbaI. It cOuld mean tHe dEaths oF huNDreds (oR many tImes tHaT) peOPLe - botH iNdIan AnD Pakistani. tHAt cAsualTy NumbEr is not Acceptable given thaT We'vE been absorbinG thOusaNDS oF loSSeS In tHe LAst 50 YEArs...scratch that - eVen in the laSt 20 YEaRs. IMHO KargIL waS a Bigger eVent thaN MumbAI than thIs since thEy had the b*LlS to wALTz oNto Indian tErritory.

strategicALly, InDIa Has no AdvAntage PuShiNg on tO IslamABad (Which Is why
 to what you say. But unde rstand tha t fir ing  anu ke n eeds  more than hav i ng o ne. Our missile shield  is p re t ty g o od , wehave se v er a l  an ti  m iss il e  d efenc e s hieldsinstalledall  a cross the bo r de r with Pak ist an including  th e Rann  o f K u tch.Yes  they  are o n ly tes ted and n ot war te s ted, bu t so  are  pakistans wepons .  A t  least our wep ons ar es el f pro duc ed, paks a re  purc h ased ch i ne s e cra p . I doubt nuk es will beu sed  evenif  th e re isa con fl i ct. 

As you sa y we  have suf feredf or 60 y e ars due  to te rro ris m an d  w enee dt o e n dit. I a m not ad vo ca tingwarb u t kill ing  all  terr orists. India  ha s no int erest  in P akis ta n and  has n o use  f or it if we occ upyit. I was  ju st  hi gh light i ng the  ca pac ity ofour Arm y  no ta d v oc ating marching toIs l a ma bad. All  we ne e dto do is ge tbac k PO K intoourc on trol and  elimi n at ethe Ter ro riststh ere , r evoke arti cle 37 0 and as simil a te Kashmir and kashmiris int o  r e s to f In dia  and vice v ersa . 

Li sten as  so m e one  whoha s  l o st a cousin in Karg il  and a n unc le in 71 warand with 3 c o usins st ills er v ing in the for ce, I  know thep ain of w ar cl oser tha n you mig h t  think.Tha tswhy  Iw a nt  to end it on c e  and  f or all.  Do  you kn ow,  aJaw anis  killed d ue to CO LD  i nsi ach en gl a zier eve ry  we ek  an d thi s  is aplace  wedo nt hav e to pu t  o u r  boy son  thr oug hthe w inte r , b ut we d o just be cau s e if  w edont Pa k will occupy  o ur post co me  Su mmer.W e  need to  kill terrorists and le t  modren  pa kista nisto gain c ont rol of  th e  count ry, un til t hi s i s donet h is  pr ob lem will n o t  go  away  f or I ndia or  the US or anyonee lse .

I hope tha tsyour b ra vad o  s p eak in g . O t h erwise what you  have stat ed is  mostly in a ccu ra te. Muc h as Iwould like to  see Paki stan wall op ed f o r  su pporting t he jehad i pigs, w h at wa r  c ouldpot ential ly  es calat e into isfar s carier  t han 20 0 peo pl e killed  in Mumbai. It could me an the  deat hsof hundre ds( ormany time s th at) people  -bot h Ind ian and P akis t an i.T hat c asua l ty number is  no t ac ceptable gi v e n  th at we 've been a bsor bing thousands of losses in thelast 5 0 y ear s ...s cr atch that - ev enin t he last20  years. IMH O Kargil  w a s a b iggereventthan Mu m b ai than t hissin ce they h adth e  b*llsto  w a ltz on to I nd ian te rritor y .

S t r ategically, Indi a has n o adv a nta ge pu sh ing ont o Is lamabad (w hich is why 
 to_what you_say. But understand that_firing a_nuke_needs more_than_having one. Our_missile shield is_pretty good, we have_several anti missile_defence_shields installed all across the border with Pakistan including the Rann of Kutch. Yes_they_are only_tested_and_not war tested, but so_are pakistans wepons. At least_our wepons_are self produced, paks are purchased chinese crap._I_doubt nukes will_be used even if there is a conflict.

As you_say we have suffered for 60_years due to_terrorism_and_we need to end_it. I am not advocating war_but killing all terrorists. India has_no interest in Pakistan and has no_use for it if we occupy_it. I was just highlighting_the capacity_of our Army not advocating_marching to Islamabad._All we_need to do_is get back POK into our_control and eliminate_the Terrorists there, revoke article 370_and_assimilate Kashmir and_kashmiris_into_rest of_India and vice_versa.

Listen_as some_one_who has lost a cousin in_Kargil_and an uncle in 71 war and_with 3 cousins still_serving_in the force, I_know the pain of war_closer than you might think. Thats_why I_want to_end it once and for all. Do you know, a Jawan_is killed due to COLD in_siachen glazier every week_and this_is_a place we_dont_have to_put our boys on through the winter,_but we_do just because if we dont_Pak will occupy our_post_come Summer. We need to kill_terrorists and let modren pakistanis to_gain control of the country,_until_this_is done this problem will_not go away for India or_the US or_anyone else.

I hope thats your bravado speaking._Otherwise_what you have stated is mostly_inaccurate._Much as I would like to_see_Pakistan_walloped for supporting the jehadi_pigs, what war could potentially escalate_into is far scarier than 200 people killed in_Mumbai. It could_mean the deaths of hundreds_(or_many_times that) people - both Indian and Pakistani. That casualty_number is_not acceptable given_that we've been absorbing thousands of losses in the last_50 years...scratch that - even in the_last 20 years. IMHO Kargil was a bigger event than Mumbai_than this since they had the b*lls to_waltz onto Indian territory.

Strategically, India has no_advantage pushing on to_Islamabad_(which is why