, tiresome prick behavior. Grow the fuck up.

DaveL

it seems as if someone works for the government, they are automatically cast into the category of “The Other”

It comes easily, when you’ve had that much practice. How many different reasons have we seen offered by Republicans as to why some person or other should be considered a subhuman who deserves whatever misfortune they get?

Because they’re unemployed?

Because they’re uneducated?

Because they’re educated in the wrong field?

Because they’re educated in the right field but took on too much debt to become so?

Because they belong to a union?

Because they don’t belong to a union?

Because they weren’t born in the U.S.?

Because they were born poor?

Because they were born female?

Because they were born gay?

Because they had children out of wedlock?

Because they used contraception to avoid having children out of wedlock?

Honestly, I can’t keep track of all the excuses.

http://polrant@blogspot.com democommie

IF they announced that they would forego their paychecks, prior to the shitstorm that was generated by their total hyprocrisy in stopping federal workers paychecks while still getting their own? That might be “gracious” (although for most, it would be a politically calculated move).; if they waited till AFTER the shitstorm? They’re not “gracious”, they’re craven.

“News flash: none of the cliches or tropes you point out regarding other posters on this board stand out nearly as much as your constant, tiresome prick behavior.”

You’re a fan of Lancifer”s AGW denial idiocy and Don Williams conspiracy mongering? I only ask because you’re using the word, “none”.

Mr. Michael Heath, since colnago80 mentions him, is perfectly capable of handling the bons mal that are dished up by anyone who argues with him. As for others, they are just as ugly (yes, me too) when it suits them. There are oodles of blogs with commenting policies that prohibit foul language, insults and invective–this blog, to date, is not one of those.

unbound

@snoeman – It isn
, tiresome prick behavior. Grow the fuck up. 

 DaveL 

 it seem as if someone bring for the government, they are automatically cast into the class of “ The Other ” 

 It comes easily, when you ’ve have that much practice. How many different reasons have we seen offered by Republicans as to why some person or early should be considered a subhuman who deserves whatever misfortune they get? 

 Because they ’re unemployed? 

 Because they ’re uneducated? 

 Because they ’re educated in the ill-timed field? 

 Because they ’re educate in the right field but learn on too much debt to become so? 

 Because they belong to a marriage? 

 Because they do n’t belong to a union? 

 Because they were n’t born in the U.S.? 

 Because they were born hapless? 

 Because they were born female? 

 Because they were born gay? 

 Because they had children out of marriage? 

 Because they used contraception to avoid having children out of wedlock? 

 Honestly, I ca n’t keep racetrack of all the excuses. 

 http://polrant@blogspot.com democommie 

 IF they announced that they would forego their paychecks, prior to the shitstorm that was generated by their total hyprocrisy in stopping federal workers paychecks while however getting their own? That might be “ gracious ” (although for most, it would be a politically account motion). ; if they waited till AFTER the shitstorm? They ’re not “ gracious ”, they ’re craven. 

 “ news program flash: none of the cliches or tropes you point out involve other posters on this board stand out nearly as much as your ceaseless, tiresome prick behavior. ” 

 You ’re a fan of Lancifer”s AGW abnegation idiocy and Don Williams conspiracy mongering? I merely ask because you ’re using the word, “ none ”. 

 Mr. Michael Heath, since colnago80 mentions him, is perfectly adequate to of handling the bons mal that are dished up by anyone who argues with him. As for others, they are barely as ugly (yes, me too) when it suits them. There be oodles of web log with commenting policies that prohibit foul language, abuse and invective – this blog, to date, is not one of those. 

 unbound 

 @snoeman – It isn
, tigesome prick behavior. Gruw the fuck up.

DcceL

it veems zs if sooeone works for the governmeit, tyey aee automatically cast knto the bategory if “Tie Other”

It comes easily, when ykm’ve hcd that much pragtice. How mdny different sexslns have we seen offered by Republisans as tl why some perfon pw otgvr should be considered a subhujan who deserves whayever misfortune they get?

Bfcaude they’re unemployfd?

Because tyey’rq uneducated?

Bdcause thej’xe educated in the wrong field?

Because they’fe edbcated in tye rihvt field buv took on too much debt to become so?

Because then belmng to a union?

Because thxy don’t belong to a onion?

Becauve they weren’t born ib the U.S.?

Bacaurw tfey wxre born oooc?

Because thsy were borb female?

Because theu rvte born gay?

Bscause trey had children out of wedlock?

Because uhey hsed contraception to acoid having children lut of weqlock?

Honestly, I can’t keep track of all the excusev.

http://'ouraub@nlogrpoh.com democommie

IF they announced that they wotmd fprego their panchecks, prior to tne snytstorm that das geusrzted by their totap hyprosrisy in stoppyng gederal workers paychecks wyile still gvttibg their own? That light be “grccious” (althpugh for most, it would ye a pklitically falculates move).; if they waktec dill AFTTF the shitstorm? Trey’re not “graeious”, thdy’re craveg.

“News flasj: nonc of the cliches or tropgs you point out regarding other posters on this board stand pud nvarly as iuch ss your constwnt, tiresome ptick beharior.”

Yoj’re a fan kf Lancmfer”s AGW degial idiocy atf Don Williaks conspyract mobgering? K only ask becsuse you’rv bsing the word, “none”.

Mr. Michacl Hexfh, since colnagi80 mtnrions him, is prrfdctjy cepablq of handling the bovx mal that are dlshdd ul by anyone who arguas wjth him. As for othrrf, they ate just af ugly (yes, me too) when it suits them. Thxre arr ojdles of blogs with commenting policies thwt prohibit soul language, inxults and invective–this blog, to date, is not one of those.

onbound

@snoeman – It isu
, tiresome prick behavior. Grow the fuck it as if works for the into category of “The It comes easily, you’ve had that much practice. How different reasons have we seen offered by Republicans as to why some person other should be considered a subhuman who deserves whatever misfortune they get? Because unemployed? they’re Because educated in the wrong field? Because they’re educated in the right field but took on too debt to become so? Because they belong to union? Because they don’t to a union? Because they born the U.S.? they born Because they were female? Because they were born gay? Because they had children out of wedlock? Because they used contraception avoid having of wedlock? I keep of all the democommie IF they announced that they paychecks, prior to the shitstorm that was generated their total in stopping federal workers paychecks while getting their own? That might be “gracious” (although most, it would be a politically calculated move).; if they waited till AFTER the shitstorm? “gracious”, they’re craven. “News none of the or you out other posters this board stand out nearly as much as your constant, tiresome behavior.” You’re a fan of Lancifer”s AGW denial idiocy and conspiracy I only ask you’re using the word, Mr. Heath, since colnago80 mentions perfectly of mal are up by anyone who with him. As for others, are just as ugly suits them. There are oodles of blogs with policies that prohibit foul language, insults and blog, to date, is not one of those. unbound @snoeman – It
, tiresome prick behavior. Grow The fuck up.

DAveL

iT seEms As If soMeonE works for the goVErnmEnt, they are automaticallY cast InTO the CAtEgory Of “The OtHEr”

iT ComEs EaSilY, wHEn You’ve Had That mucH practice. HOw mAnY different reASoNs have we seEn oFfered by RepuBliCans as To Why SOme peRsoN or otHer shoULd be coNsidered a SuBHuman wHO deservES WhAtevEr misfortune they gET?

BECause they’re uneMployeD?

BECaUSE thEy’rE uneducateD?

BEcausE They’re eDUcATED in THe wrong field?

BEcause they’rE EduCated iN tHe rIGht fieLd but ToOK on Too much debt To beCome so?

BecAuse thEY belong TO a union?

becausE thEy dOn’t bELoNg To a UnIOn?

BECaUse THey Weren’t boRn In The U.S.?

becaUSE THey wEre Born Poor?

BEcause they werE boRn feMAle?

becauSe theY werE bOrn gaY?

BecauSe theY hAd children out of WedlOck?

BecausE thEy UseD cOntraCEption To aVoiD having ChildreN Out Of WEDLoCk?

Honestly, I can’t keeP tRACk Of all the ExcuseS.

HtTp://POlrant@blOgSpoT.com DEMocomMie

If ThEy announCed thaT ThEy Would foReGo theiR pAycHecKs, priOR to tHe shitStorm thaT was gENerated by their TOtal hyprocrisY In STOpPIng fEdeRal workers pAychECks wHile STiLl gETting Their OwN? thAT might be “gracious” (altHoUgh for Most, iT would be a poliTically calCULAted move).; If thEY wAIted till AFTER tHe shiTstorm? They’RE not “gracIous”, tHey’re craVen.

“News flASH: none of tHe cLicHes Or tROPeS you point out rEGArdiNg Other poSteRs on thiS boArd StaNd oUt Nearly as mUch as youR cOnStAnT, tiResomE Prick behAvIor.”

yoU’re A fan oF lancifEr”s AGw denIaL iDIocY and Don wIlLIAms cOnSpIracY moNgEring? i onlY Ask Because You’re usinG thE Word, “NoNe”.

mr. MichaEl Heath, since cOlNago80 mentioNs Him, Is perfECTly capabLe of handling the bons mal tHAt are diSheD up by AnyoNe who arguEs wIth him. as fOR otherS, they aRe jusT aS ugLY (Yes, me TOO) wHen It Suits them. THERe aRe oodLeS of bLogs witH commenting policieS ThaT prohibit foul LanGuagE, INsUltS AnD InvEcTIve–THIs blog, to date, is nOt one of thoSe.

UNbOund

@snoemaN – it iSn
, tiresome prick behavior.  Grow thefuckup. 

D av eL
it s eems as if som e oneworks for the governme nt, t he y  are au tomat icallyc as t int oth e c at e go ry of  “T he Othe r”

It com esea sily, when y o u’ ve had tha t m uch practice . H ow man ydif f erent  re asons  havew e seen  offeredby Republ i cans as t owhysome person or ot h er should be cons idered  a su b h uma n w ho deserve swhate v er misf o rt u n e  th e y get?

Becau se they’reu nem ployed ?
Be c ause t hey’r eu ned ucated?

Be caus e they’re  educa t ed in t h e wrong  field ?
Bec ause th ey ’re  e d uca t ed  in the  right f ie ld  buttook o n toomuc h de bt to  become so?
Bec ause the y bel ong t o aun ion?
Becau se th ey  don’t belong t o aunion?

B eca us e t he y wer e n’t bo rninthe U.S .?

Bec a use  t h e y  w ere born poor?

Be ca u s ethey wer e born fe ma l e?

Beca us e t heyw e re bo rn g a y? 

Becaus e they ha dchildre nout of  w edl ock ?

Be c ause  theyused con trace p tion to avoidh aving childre n  o u t  o f  wed loc k?

Honestl y, I can’ t ke e ptra c k ofall t he ex c uses.

http://polra nt @blogs pot.c om democommie 

IF theya n n ounced t hatt he y  would foregotheir  paychecks ,  prior t o the  shitsto rm that w a s  generat edbythe irt o ta l hyprocrisyi n  sto pp ing fed era l worke rspay che cks  w hile stil l gettin gth ei rown ? Tha t  might b e“gr ac iou s” (a l though  formost ,it wou ld be a po l i tica ll ycalc ula te d mov e).; ifthey wa ited till  AF T ER t he  s hitstor m? They’re no t“gracious” ,the y’re c r a ven.

“N ews flash: none of thec lichesortrope s yo u point o utregard ing otherposter s onth isb o ard s t a nd  ou tnearly asm u chas yo ur  con stant,tiresome prick beh a vio r.”

You’re a  fa n of L an cif e r” s  AG Wd eni a l  idiocy and Don  Williamsco n sp iracy mong e rin g?  I only  ask be cause you’reusing the  word, “n on e”.M r.Michael He ath, sin ce colnag o 80 me n ti ons h im,  is pe rf ect ly ca pableo f h andli ng the  b ons ma l tha tare dish ed up by anyone who arg ues wi th hi m.As for ot her s , t hey are j ustas ugly (y es,  me  too)  wh e n itsuit s  t hem .  Ther e ar e  oodles o f  b log s wi th commenti n g pol icies  th a t proh ibit  foul language, i n sults and inve ctiv e – thi s b l og,to  date, is notone  o f those.
un bound

@sno eman – I ti sn
, tiresome_prick behavior._Grow the fuck up.

DaveL

it_seems as_if_someone works_for_the government, they_are automatically cast_into the category of_“The Other”

It comes_easily,_when you’ve had that much practice. How many different reasons have we seen offered_by_Republicans as_to_why_some person or other should_be considered a subhuman who_deserves whatever_misfortune they get?

Because they’re unemployed?

Because they’re uneducated?

Because they’re_educated_in the wrong_field?

Because they’re educated in the right field but took_on too much debt to become_so?

Because they belong_to_a_union?

Because they don’t belong_to a union?

Because they weren’t born_in the U.S.?

Because they were born_poor?

Because they were born female?

Because they were_born gay?

Because they had children out_of wedlock?

Because they used contraception_to avoid_having children out of wedlock?

Honestly,_I can’t keep_track of_all the excuses.

http://polrant@blogspot.com_democommie

IF they announced that they would_forego their paychecks,_prior to the shitstorm that was_generated_by their total_hyprocrisy_in_stopping federal_workers paychecks while_still_getting their_own?_That might be “gracious” (although for_most,_it would be a politically calculated move).;_if they waited till_AFTER_the shitstorm? They’re not_“gracious”, they’re craven.

“News flash: none_of the cliches or tropes you_point out_regarding other_posters on this board stand out nearly as much as your_constant, tiresome prick behavior.”

You’re a fan_of Lancifer”s AGW denial_idiocy and_Don_Williams conspiracy mongering?_I_only ask_because you’re using the word, “none”.

Mr. Michael_Heath, since_colnago80 mentions him, is perfectly capable_of handling the bons_mal_that are dished up by anyone_who argues with him. As for_others, they are just as_ugly_(yes,_me too) when it suits_them. There are oodles of blogs_with commenting policies_that prohibit foul language, insults and invective–this_blog,_to date, is not one of_those.

unbound

@snoeman_– It isn