 has now stepped in. It is officially naming and denouncing US-critical internet sites for �fake news�.

Not even the medieval Church went so far in its Index Librorum Prohibitorum of prohibited writings. It was at least innocent of scientific method and openly declared its dogmas. Not Harvard.

Underneath notice, all the sites it attacks are internet commons, and none are financed by private corporate donors and captive institutions while Harvard and the corporate media are. This is the real battle agenda underneath, the long war to privatize the news for profit as everything else with anti-establishment internet criticism now the target.

In the background, Harvard University has long propagated an unexamined academic method. It normally cuts off any faculty or learned source of opposition to the private corporate rule of America and the wars of aggression to impose it on the world. Accordingly, the underling grand narrative equations of the US is Good and the designated Enemy is Evil is not questioned. It is presupposed. Malevolent motives are always assumed of the designated Enemy, down to Harvard-produced geostrategic economic and war models. So when a host of internet commons sites challenge the grand narrative framework, Harvard and satellites denounce them to stop people reading them. A long list of critical sites is accused without criteria, proof or evidence as all spreaders of �fake news�.

What is not recognised here is that only on the internet commons can the process of truth be free from ruling pressures to control message for external sponsors.

Here there is no commercial-profit condition to speak and write, and no livelihood dependence on private profit. There is no inducement to avoid life-and-death issues in academic obfuscation or ad-vehicle style. Internet authors not on the payroll can be free of the game of all games behind the scenes � enriching the rich further with no life-coherent criterion of truth.

These underlying conditions of the internet commons and free speech itself cannot be recognised by the academy or the corporate press without undercutting their proclaimed status as the only legitimate founts of truth. The internet commons is a new world of competitive capacities to research, understand and disseminate not bound by private money patronage (as over centuries in Harvard University).

When challenged in this way, Harvard (and the official press) are set back on their heels. They cannot think the facts through because their instituted presumptions
has now stepped in. It is officially naming and denounce US - critical internet web site for � fake news �. 

 Not even the medieval Church go so far in its Index Librorum Prohibitorum of prohibited writing. It was at least barren of scientific method and openly declare its dogmas. Not Harvard. 

 Underneath notice, all the web site it attacks are internet commons, and none are finance by private corporate donors and captive institutions while Harvard and the corporate medium are. This is the real battle agenda underneath, the long war to privatize the newsworthiness for profit as everything else with anti - establishment internet criticism now the target. 

 In the background, Harvard University has long propagate an unexamined academic method. It normally cuts off any faculty or learned source of enemy to the private corporate rule of America and the wars of aggression to impose it on the world. Accordingly, the underling grand narrative equations of the US is Good and the designated Enemy is Evil is not questioned. It is presupposed. Malevolent motives are always wear of the designated Enemy, down to Harvard - produced geostrategic economic and war mannequin. therefore when a host of internet commons sites challenge the august narrative model, Harvard and satellites denounce them to stop citizenry reading them. A long list of critical sites is accused without criteria, proof or evidence as all spreaders of � fake news �. 

 What is not recognised here is that merely on the internet commons can the procedure of truth be free from ruling pressures to control message for external patron. 

 Here there is no commercial - profit condition to address and write, and no livelihood dependence on private net income. There is no inducement to avoid life - and - death emergence in academic obfuscation or ad - fomite style. Internet authors not on the payroll can be free of the game of all plot behind the scenes � enriching the rich further with no life - coherent standard of truth. 

 These underlying conditions of the internet commonalty and free speech itself cannot be recognised by the academy or the corporate press without undersell their proclaimed status as the alone legitimate founts of accuracy. The internet commons is a new world of competitive capacities to research, understand and disseminate not bound by private money patronage (as over centuries in Harvard University). 

 When challenged in this manner, Harvard (and the official wardrobe) are adjust back on their heels. They cannot think the facts through because their instituted presumptions
 had now stepped in. It is onficially naming and deiouncinf US-critkcal internet sites for �fake nwws�.

Nou even the medieval Church wvnt so fae in uts Index Librorum Prohigltoruk of prohibited writings. Ht was at leasd knuocent of scientific method and openjy declsrfd its dogmas. Got Nwrvadd.

Underneath notice, all the sites jt attabks are internet vommons, and none are finanfed hy private corporahe donors abd cwptive institjtions while Harvard ahd the corporate media are. This is tke real batjls wcenda underieath, nhe long war bp privdtize tne news for prpfiv as everything else with anti-establishment internet cxiticism now the targwt.

Un thg bacngrojbd, Farbacd Hniverditb has long lropagated qn unexamined acadekis method. It nodmally ctts off any faculty or learned source ox olposition to the privatw corporate rule of Alerica anq the wars of aggression to impose it on the worlg. Acckfdiunjh, tje underling grand narrative equations of the HS ix Good and the designated Ejeki is Evil is nut questikned. It is presupplsed. Majevolwnt motivts arr always assumed of the desugnated Enemj, doqn to Harvard-produeed geostratzgic evonomoc and war models. So whzn a hkst of integnet commkvs sites challenee nhe crand narrative framework, Rarvard aid sacellites denpunce ehem to stlp people reading them. A long lhst of crihical sites is accused without rciteria, proof os enidence af all spreaders of �fake news�.

What is not recoenised herv is that only on thq internet coklons can the process of rruty be frdd from ruling lressures to controo message for extevnal rlonsors.

Here thext iw no commercial-lrowit clnvitiog to speak ang wrkte, snd nu livelihoob aepemdence on private prmfit. There is no inducrmcnt to aviid life-wnd-death issurs in academic obfkscatmon or ad-venicje style. Internet authors not kn the pajrojl can be frqe on thg game of akl games behind the scenes � enriching tie rich further with no life-coherent critetiok of truth.

Thxse unqerlying wonditions of the inrernet commons anc free speech itself dannot be rfcognised by the academy or the corporate press without undercutting theie proclaimed statua as the mnjv legitymatx hounts of truth. Tne internet commons is a new wocld of com[ecitive capacities to research, uvderstand and disseminate not bound bg privatr money patronage (as over centuties in Harvard Universiby).

When chqllenfed in thir way, Harvard (and yhe ofyicial press) qre det back on tfeit meels. They caniot think the facts through because their ijstituted presum'tions
has now stepped in. It is officially denouncing internet sites �fake news�. Not so in its Index Prohibitorum of prohibited It was at least innocent of method and openly declared its dogmas. Not Harvard. Underneath notice, all the sites attacks are internet commons, and none are financed by private corporate donors and institutions Harvard the media are. This is the real battle agenda underneath, the long war to privatize the news profit as everything else with anti-establishment internet criticism the target. In the Harvard University has long propagated unexamined method. It cuts any or learned source opposition to the private corporate rule of America and the wars of aggression to impose it on world. Accordingly, grand narrative of US Good and the is Evil is not questioned. It motives are always assumed of the designated Enemy, to Harvard-produced economic and war models. So when host of internet commons sites challenge the grand framework, Harvard and satellites denounce them to stop people reading them. A long list of is accused without criteria, or evidence as spreaders �fake What not recognised is that only on the internet commons can the process of be free from ruling pressures to control message for external there no commercial-profit condition speak and write, and livelihood on private profit. There inducement avoid academic or style. Internet authors not the payroll can be free the game of all enriching the rich further with no life-coherent criterion truth. These underlying conditions of the internet and free speech itself cannot be recognised by the academy or the press without proclaimed status as the only legitimate founts of The internet commons is new world of competitive capacities to research, understand and not by private patronage (as over in Harvard University). challenged in this (and the press) set heels. They cannot think the facts because instituted presumptions
 has now stepped in. It is officiAlly naming And deNouNciNg uS-crIticAl internet siteS For �fAke news�.

Not even the medieVal ChUrCH wenT So Far in Its IndeX liBROruM PRoHibItORuM of prOhiBited wrItings. It waS at LeAst innocent oF ScIentific meThoD and openly deClaRed its DoGmaS. not HaRvaRd.

UndErneatH Notice, All the sitEs IT attacKS are intERNeT comMons, and none are finANcED by private corpOrate dOnORs AND caPtiVe institutIoNs whiLE HarvarD AnD THE coRPorate media arE. This is the rEAl bAttle aGeNda UNderneAth, thE lONg wAr to privatiZe thE news for pRofit aS EverythINg else wIth antI-esTabLishMEnT iNteRnET crITiCisM Now The targeT.

IN tHe bacKgroUND, hArvaRd UNiveRsity Has long propagAteD an uNExaMined AcadeMic mEtHod. It NormalLy cutS oFf any faculty or lEarnEd source oF opPoSitIoN to thE PrivatE coRpoRate rulE of AmerICa aNd THE WaRs of aggression to imPoSE It On the worLd. AccoRDiNgLY, the undeRlIng GranD NArratIve eQUaTions of tHe US is gOoD aNd the deSiGnated enEmy Is EVil is NOt quEstionEd. It is prEsuppOSed. Malevolent mOTives are alwayS AsSUMeD Of thE deSignated EneMy, doWN to HArvaRD-pRodUCed geOstraTeGIc EConomic and war models. so When a hOst of Internet commoNs sites chaLLENge the grAnd nARrATive framework, HArvarD and satellITes denouNce thEm to stop People reaDINg them. A lOng LisT of CriTICaL sites is accusED WithOuT criterIa, pRoof or eVidEncE as All SpReaders of �Fake news�.

whAt Is NoT reCogniSEd here is ThAt oNlY on The inTErnet cOmmonS can ThE pROceSs of truTH bE FRee fRoM rUlinG prEsSures To coNTroL messagE for exterNal SPonsOrS.

HEre therE is no commerciAl-Profit condItIon To speaK ANd write, aNd no livelihood dependencE On privaTe pRofit. therE is no induCemEnt to aVoiD Life-anD-death IssueS iN acADEmic oBFUsCatIoN or ad-vehicLE StyLe. IntErNet aUthors nOt on the payroll can bE FreE of the game of aLl gAmes BEHiNd tHE sCEneS � eNRicHINg the rich furtheR with no lifE-cOHeRent criterIOn oF tRuth.

TheSe underLying COnditioNs of the inTernet comMoNs anD FRee Speech itseLf cannot Be recogniSEd by tHE aCademY or The corPoRatE presS withoUT unDercuTting tHeIr procLaimeD sTatus as tHe only legitimate founts oF truth. the inTerNet commonS is A New World of coMpetItive capacItiEs tO reseArcH, UnderStanD AnD diSSeminAte nOT bound by pRIvAte MONeY patronage (aS OVEr cEnturIes IN HarvaRd UnIversity).

When challENged in this way, HArvaRD (And The OFficIaL press) are set baCk oN tHEIr heels. THeY cannot thinK the factS tHRough BecausE their InstituTED pREsumptIons
 has now stepped in. It is  officiall y nam ing  an ddeno unci ng US-critical inte rnet sites for �fake n ews�. 
N ot e v en  themedieva l  C h u rch  w en t s of ar  in i tsIndex L ibrorum Pr ohi bi torum of pro h ib ited writi ngs . It was atlea st inn oc ent of sc ien tific  metho d  and o penly dec la r ed its dogmas. N ot  Har vard.

Underneath no t ice, all the s ites i ta tt a c ksare  internetco mmons ,  and no n ea r e  fi n anced by priv ate corpora t e d onorsan d c a ptiveinsti tu t ion s while Har vard  and thecorpor a te medi a  are. T his is  th e r ealb at tl e a ge n dau nd ern e ath , the lo ng  w ar to  pri v a t i ze t henews  forprofit as eve ryt hing els e wit h ant i-es ta blish ment i ntern et  criticism nowthetarget.
Inth e b ac kgrou n d, Har var d U niversi ty hasl ong  p r o p ag ated an unexamined  a c a de mic meth od. It no rm a lly cuts  o ffanyf a culty  orl ea rned sou rce of op po sitionto  the p ri vat e c orpor a te r ule of  America  andt he wars of agg r ession to imp o se i to n th e w orld. Accor ding l y, t he u n de rli n g gra nd na rr a ti v e equations of theUS  is Go od an d the designa ted Enemyi s Evil isnotq ue s tioned. It ispresu pposed. Ma l evolentmotiv es are a lways ass u m ed of th e d esi gna ted E ne my, down to H a r vard -p roduced  ge ostrate gic  ec ono mic  a nd war mo dels. So  w he nahos t ofi nternetco mmo ns  si tes c h alleng e the  gra nd  n a rra tive fr a me w o rk,Ha rv ardand  s atell ites den ounce t hem to st opp eopl ere ading t hem. A long l is t of criti ca l s ites i s accusedwithout criteria, proof or evid enc e asallspreaders  of  �fake  ne w s�.

W hat is  notre cog n i sed h e r eisth at only on t heinter ne t co mmons c an the process oft rut h be free fro m r ulin g pr ess u re s  to  c o ntr o l  message for ex ternal spo ns o rs .

Here th e reis  no com mercial -prof i t condi tion to s peak andwr ite, a ndno livelih ood depe ndence on priva t eprofi t.Thereis  no  indu cement toavoid  life- an d-deat h iss ue s in aca demic obfuscation or ad -vehic le st yle . Interne t a u tho rs not on  the  payroll c anbefreeoft he ga me o f  a llg amesbehi n d the sce n es  �e n ri ching the r i c h  fu rther  wi t h no l ife- coherent criterio n  of truth.

Th eseu n der lyi n g co nd itions of theint er n e t common sand free sp eech its el f  cann ot berecogn ised by t he academ y or  th e corpora tepr e ss with ou tu ndercu ttin gtheirprocla i meds t atus as the only  legi t i matef oun ts of  t ruth. T h e in ternet com mons is a n ew wor ld o f com petitiv ecapaci tie sto researc h , underst and a nd diss em inat e n ot bou nd b y priva te m on eypatronage ( as ov er cen turi es in  H arva rd Univer s ity).

W hen challen ge d i n this w a y, H arvard (an d t he of f i cial press )  are se t  back  on th eir he els. Th e y c an not thi nkt h e facts t hrough be c aus ethei r instit ut ed p re sum pt ions
 has_now stepped_in. It is officially_naming and_denouncing_US-critical internet_sites_for �fake news�.

Not_even the medieval_Church went so far_in its Index_Librorum_Prohibitorum of prohibited writings. It was at least innocent of scientific method and openly_declared_its dogmas._Not_Harvard.

Underneath_notice, all the sites it_attacks are internet commons, and_none are_financed by private corporate donors and captive institutions_while_Harvard and the_corporate media are. This is the real battle agenda_underneath, the long war to privatize_the news for_profit_as_everything else with anti-establishment_internet criticism now the target.

In the_background, Harvard University has long propagated_an unexamined academic method. It normally cuts_off any faculty or learned source_of opposition to the private_corporate rule_of America and the wars_of aggression to_impose it_on the world._Accordingly, the underling grand narrative equations_of the US_is Good and the designated Enemy_is_Evil is not_questioned._It_is presupposed._Malevolent motives are_always_assumed of_the_designated Enemy, down to Harvard-produced geostrategic_economic_and war models. So when a host_of internet commons sites_challenge_the grand narrative framework,_Harvard and satellites denounce them_to stop people reading them. A_long list_of critical_sites is accused without criteria, proof or evidence as all spreaders_of �fake news�.

What is not recognised_here is that only_on the_internet_commons can the_process_of truth_be free from ruling pressures to control_message for_external sponsors.

Here there is no commercial-profit_condition to speak and_write,_and no livelihood dependence on private_profit. There is no inducement to_avoid life-and-death issues in academic_obfuscation_or_ad-vehicle style. Internet authors not_on the payroll can be free_of the game_of all games behind the scenes �_enriching_the rich further with no life-coherent_criterion_of truth.

These underlying conditions of the_internet_commons_and free speech itself cannot_be recognised by the academy or_the corporate press without undercutting their proclaimed status as_the only legitimate_founts of truth. The internet_commons_is_a new world of competitive capacities to research, understand and_disseminate not_bound by private_money patronage (as over centuries in Harvard University).

When challenged in_this way, Harvard (and the official press)_are set back on their heels. They cannot think the facts_through because their instituted presumptions