 Hillary Clinton during her testimony before Congress
and will ‘take appropriate action as necessary. To assist the investigation,
this letter identifies several pieces of Secretary Clinton’s testimony that
appear to implicate 18 U.S.C. §§1621 and 1001 the criminal statutes that
prohibit perjury and false statements, respectively. The evidence collected by
the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) during its investigation of Secretary
Clinton’s use of a personal email system during her time as Secretary of State
appears to directly contradict several aspects of her sworn testimony, which
are described in greater detail below.

Before
detailing at least four specific instances in which Clinton allegedly committed
perjury, the House Republicans explained the matter a bit further:

During a House
Select Committee on Benghazi hearing on October 22, 2015, Secretary Clinton
testified with respect to (1) whether she sent or received emails that were
marked classified at the time; (2) whether her attorneys reviewed each of the
emails on her personal email system; (3) whether there was one, or more servers
that stored work-related emails during her time as Secretary of State; and (4)
whether she provided all her work-related emails to the Department of State.
Although there may be other aspects of Secretary Clinton’s sworn testimony that
are at odds with the FBI’s findings, her testimony in those four areas bears
specific scrutiny in light of the facts and evidence FBI Director James Comey
described in his public statement on July 5, 2016 and in testimony before the
Committee on Oversight and Government Reform on July 7, 2016.

The key portions
that show Hillary Clinton perjured herself was when she explained in sworn
testimony that she never sent or received emails on her illicit email server.
With what the FBI described as “extreme carelessness.” America’s national
security was put at risk.

A retired
assistant FBI director, and 28-year-veteran of the bureau, said a perjury
review is generally straightforward for agents.

“They look at
the transcript of the testimony they provided in light of what they know to be,
suspect to be the truth. They investigate both sides and take the aggregate and
turn it over to the prosecuting authority for a decision,” Steven Pomerantz
said.

“Since the
Director (Comey
Hillary Clinton during her testimony before Congress 
 and will ‘ take appropriate action as necessary. To assist the investigation, 
 this letter identify respective pieces of Secretary Clinton ’s testimony that 
 appear to entail 18 U.S.C. § § 1621 and 1001 the criminal legislative act that 
 prohibit perjury and false statement, respectively. The evidence collect by 
 the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) during its investigation of Secretary 
 Clinton ’s function of a personal email system during her prison term as Secretary of State 
 appears to directly negate respective aspects of her sworn testimony, which 
 are trace in greater detail downstairs. 

 Before 
 detailing at least four specific instances in which Clinton allegedly committed 
 perjury, the House Republicans excuse the matter a bit further: 

 During a House 
 Select Committee on Benghazi hear on October 22, 2015, Secretary Clinton 
 testified with respect to (1) whether she sent or received emails that were 
 punctuate classified at the time; (2) whether her attorneys reviewed each of the 
 emails on her personal email system; (3) whether there was one, or more servers 
 that stored work - related emails during her time as Secretary of State; and (4) 
 whether she provided all her work - related electronic mail to the Department of State. 
 Although there may be early aspects of Secretary Clinton ’s sworn testimony that 
 are at odds with the FBI ’s findings, her testimony in those four area bears 
 specific scrutiny in light of the fact and evidence FBI Director James Comey 
 described in his public statement on July 5, 2016 and in testimony before the 
 Committee on Oversight and Government Reform on July 7, 2016. 

 The key portions 
 that usher Hillary Clinton perjured herself was when she explained in sworn 
 testimony that she never sent or received emails on her illegitimate email server. 
 With what the FBI described as “ extreme carelessness. ” America ’s national 
 security was put at hazard. 

 A retire 
 assistant FBI director, and 28 - year - veteran of the agency, said a perjury 
 review is generally square for agents. 

 “ They look at 
 the transcript of the testimony they provided in light of what they sleep together to be, 
 suspect to be the accuracy. They investigate both sides and take the aggregate and 
 turn it over to the prosecuting assurance for a decision, ” Steven Pomerantz 
 say. 

 “ Since the 
 Director (Comey
 Hiplary Clinton during her testimony befote Congrxss
and sill ‘takd appropriate action as necedsqry. Ti assist the investigagion,
this petter ieentmfies several pixdes of Secretzvy Clnnvon’s testimony jhat
appear tm implicate 18 U.V.C. §§1621 cnd 1001 the criminal statutes that
prohifit perkugy and false sjatemtntf, reaiegtively. The evidence collected bg
the Feveral Bureau of Investigation (FBI) during lts lnvestigation of Sfcretary
Clibton’f use of a pefsonal emapn system doring her time as Secretary of Sgate
a'pears to durwctpi contradict sevegal aspects on her sforn textimony, which
ave devcrubed in greater detain below.

Before
detaijing at laaat four specific unwtancgs in whizy Cuinuon amlegedpy rommitted
pedjury, the Hiuse Republicans exklaybed the matted a bie surther:

During a House
Select Committee ot Bsnghazi hearing on Octover 22, 2015, Secretary Clintln
testifiqd with respect to (1) whether she sent or received amaila thcb dwrf
marked classified at the time; (2) whether her aefotnvys reviewed each of the
emaiks om her personal email syatem; (3) whether therf was oge, or more serders
yhat stored work-related emauls during hvr tume as Secretary oy State; and (4)
chethet she lrovided all her work-reuates emails to the Depadgment of State.
Algholgh dhere may be other aspects of Secrevary Elinton’s swotn testymony that
wre ab odds with the FBI’d finbings, her testilony in those four areas bears
s'xcific scrutimy in light oy the nacts and evidegce FBI Directpr Jamef Comdy
describes in hiv public stwtement on Juni 5, 2016 and in tevtimony fefoee tye
Commiggee on Oversignt and Gonexnment Redorm on July 7, 2016.

The ley lortions
that shiw Yillary Clinton pefjuwef iersejx was when sve ebplxoned kn sworn
tesbimuny yhat she never sent mr rsceived emails on nev illicit email sqrver.
With whay the FBI describef as “xxtremx carekesfness.” America’s national
securitg was put at risk.

A retirqd
aswistant FBI birector, and 28-year-veteran of the bureau, seid a perjury
review is tenerally straightfpvward for agxnts.

“Thqy look ad
the transcript of tye testimony they provided in light of what dhey nnow to be,
suspect to be the truth. They investigate both sides and take thw aggrxgwte and
turn it pver no che prosesutiig authority for a decision,” Steven Pomerantz
said.

“Smnce the
Diseetor (Comey
Hillary Clinton during her testimony before Congress ‘take action as To assist the pieces Secretary Clinton’s testimony appear to implicate U.S.C. §§1621 and 1001 the criminal that prohibit perjury and false statements, respectively. The evidence collected by the Federal of Investigation (FBI) during its investigation of Secretary Clinton’s use of a personal system her as of State appears to directly contradict several aspects of her sworn testimony, which are described in detail below. Before detailing at least four specific in which Clinton allegedly perjury, the House Republicans explained matter bit further: a Select on Benghazi hearing October 22, 2015, Secretary Clinton testified with respect to (1) whether she sent or received emails that marked classified time; (2) her reviewed of the emails personal email system; (3) whether there more servers that stored work-related emails during her as Secretary State; and (4) whether she provided her work-related emails to the Department of State. there may be other aspects of Secretary Clinton’s sworn testimony that are at odds with findings, her testimony in four areas bears scrutiny light the and evidence Director James Comey described in his public statement on July 5, and in testimony before the Committee on Oversight and Government July 2016. The key that show Hillary Clinton herself when she explained in that never emails her email server. With what FBI described as “extreme carelessness.” national security was put FBI director, and 28-year-veteran of the bureau, said perjury review is generally straightforward for agents. look at the transcript of the testimony they provided in light of they know suspect to be the truth. They investigate both and take the aggregate turn it over to the prosecuting authority for a Steven said. “Since Director (Comey
 Hillary Clinton during her teStimony befOre CoNgrEss
AnD wilL ‘takE appropriate acTIon aS necessary. To assist the iNvestIgATion,
THiS lettEr identIFiES SevErAl PieCeS Of secreTarY ClintoN’s testimonY thAt
Appear to implICaTe 18 U.S.C. §§1621 and 1001 thE crIminal statutEs tHat
proHiBit PErjurY anD falsE stateMEnts, reSpectivelY. THE evideNCe colleCTEd By
thE Federal Bureau of INVeSTigation (FBI) durIng its InVEsTIGatIon Of SecretarY
CLintoN’S use of a PErSONAl eMAil system duriNg her time as sEcrEtary oF STatE
AppearS to diReCTly Contradict sEverAl aspects Of her sWOrn testIMony, whiCh
are dEscRibEd in GReAtEr dEtAIl bELoW.

BeFOre
DetailinG aT lEast fOur sPECIFic iNstAnceS in whIch Clinton allEgeDly cOMmiTted
pErjurY, the hoUse RePublicAns exPlAined the matter a Bit fUrther:

DurIng A HOusE
SElect cOmmittEe oN BeNghazi hEaring oN octObER 22, 2015, sEcRetary Clinton
testiFiED WiTh respecT to (1) wheTHeR sHE sent or rEcEivEd emAILs thaT werE
MaRked clasSified AT tHe Time; (2) wheThEr her aTtOrnEys RevieWEd eaCh of thE
emails oN her pERsonal email sysTEm; (3) whether therE WaS ONe, OR morE seRvers
that stOred WOrk-rElatED eMaiLS duriNg her TiME aS secretary of State; and (4)
WhEther sHe proVided all her woRk-related eMAILs to the DEparTMeNT of State.
AlthouGh theRe may be othER aspects Of SecRetary ClInton’s swoRN TestimonY thAt
aRe aT odDS WiTh the FBI’s findINGs, heR tEstimonY in Those foUr aReaS beArs
SpEcific scrUtiny in lIgHt Of ThE faCts anD Evidence fBi DiReCtoR JameS comey
dEscriBed iN hIs PUblIc stateMEnT ON JulY 5, 2016 aNd In teStiMoNy befOre tHE
CoMmittee On OversigHt aND GovErNmEnt RefoRm on July 7, 2016.

The keY pOrtions
thaT sHow hillarY cLinton peRjured herself was when she EXplaineD in Sworn
TestImony that She Never sEnt OR receiVed emaIls on HeR ilLICit emAIL sErvEr.
with what thE fbI dEscriBeD as “eXtreme cArelessness.” America’S NatIonal
security Was Put aT RIsK.

A rETiREd
aSsIStaNT fBI director, and 28-yEar-veteran Of THe Bureau, said A PerJuRy
revieW is geneRally STraightForward foR agents.

“ThEy Look AT
The Transcript Of the tesTimony theY ProviDEd In ligHt oF what tHeY knOw to bE,
suspeCT to Be the Truth. THeY invesTigatE bOth sides And take the aggregate and
tUrn it oVer to The ProsecutiNg aUThoRity for a dEcisIon,” Steven POmeRanTz
saiD.

“SiNCe the
direCToR (CoMEy
 Hillary Clinton during he r testimon y bef ore  Co ng ress 
and  will ‘take ap p ropr iate action as necessa ry. T oa ssis t  t he in vestiga t io n , 
th is  l ett er id entif ies  severa l pieces o f S ec retary Clint o n’ s testimon y t hat
appear t o i mplica te  18 U.S.C . § §1621  and 1 0 01 the  criminal  s t atutes that
pr o h ib it p erjury and falses ta t ements, respec tively .T he e vid enc e collecte dby
th e  Federa l  B u r e auo f Investigati on (FBI) du r ing  its i nv est i gation  of S ec r eta ry
Clinton’ s us e of a pe rsonal email s y stem du ring h ertim e as Se cr eta ry ofS ta tea ppe ars to d ir ec tly c ontr a d i c t se ver al a spect s of her swor n t esti m ony , whi ch
ar e de sc ribed  in gr eater  d etail below.

B efor e
detaili ngat  le as t fou r  speci fic  in stances  in whi c h C li n t o nallegedly committe dp e rj ury, the  House Re pu b licans e xp lai nedt h e mat tera  b it furth er:

D u ri ng  a Hous eSelect  C omm itt ee on Beng hazi h earing o n Oct o ber 22, 2015,S ecretary Clin t on t es t ifie d w ith respect  to( 1) w heth e rshe sentor re ce i ve d  emails that were
m ar ked cl assif ied at the ti me; (2) wh e t h er her a ttor n ey s  reviewed each  of t he
emailso n her pe rsona l emailsystem; ( 3 )  whether  th ere  wa s o n e ,or more serve r s 
tha tstoredwor k-relat edema ils  du ri ng her ti me as Se cr et ar yofState ;  and (4) 
w het he r s he pr o videdall h er w or k- r ela ted ema i ls t o th eDe part men tof St ate. Alt hough t here maybeo ther  a sp ects of  Secretary Cl in ton’s swor ntes timony t hat
areat odds with the FBI’sf indings , h er te stim ony in th ose  fourare a s bear s
spec ificsc rut i n y inl i gh t o fthe factsa n d e viden ce  FBI  Direct or James Comey
des c rib ed in his pub lic  sta t e me nto nJ uly  5 ,  20 1 6  and in testimo ny beforeth e 
C ommittee o n  Ov er sight a nd Gove rnmen t  Reform  on July7, 2016.
T he k e y  po rtions
tha t show H illary Cl i ntonp er jured  he rselfwa s w hen s he exp l ain ed in  sworn 
t estimo ny th at  she nev er sent or received ema ils on  herill icit emai l s e rve r.
With w hatthe FBI de scr ibe d as“ex t remecare l es sne s s.” A meri c a’s natio n al 
se c u ri ty was puta t ris k.

A  re t ired
a ssis tant FBI director ,  and 28-year-v eter a n  of  th e  bur ea u, said a perj ury 
r e v iew is g en erally stra ightforw ar d  foragents .

“Th ey look a tt he tra nscr ipt  of the t est im o ny they  p ro v ided i n li gh t of w hat th e y kn o w  to be,
suspectto be t he tr u th.  They  i nvestig a te b oth sidesand take th e aggr egat e and 
turn i tover t o t he  prosecuti n g authori ty fo r a dec is ion, ” S tevenPome r a ntz
s aid. 
“Si nce the
D i r ec t or  ( C ome y
 Hillary_Clinton during_her testimony before Congress
and_will ‘take_appropriate_action as_necessary._To assist the_investigation,
this letter identifies_several pieces of Secretary_Clinton’s testimony that
appear_to_implicate 18 U.S.C. §§1621 and 1001 the criminal statutes that
prohibit perjury and false statements,_respectively._The evidence_collected_by
the_Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)_during its investigation of Secretary
Clinton’s_use of_a personal email system during her time as_Secretary_of State
appears to_directly contradict several aspects of her sworn testimony, which
are_described in greater detail below.

Before
detailing at_least four specific_instances_in_which Clinton allegedly committed
perjury,_the House Republicans explained the matter_a bit further:

During a House
Select Committee_on Benghazi hearing on October 22, 2015,_Secretary Clinton
testified with respect to (1)_whether she sent or received_emails that_were
marked classified at the time;_(2) whether her_attorneys reviewed_each of the
emails_on her personal email system; (3)_whether there was_one, or more servers
that stored work-related_emails_during her time_as_Secretary_of State;_and (4)
whether she_provided_all her_work-related_emails to the Department of State.
Although_there_may be other aspects of Secretary Clinton’s_sworn testimony that
are at_odds_with the FBI’s findings,_her testimony in those four_areas bears
specific scrutiny in light of_the facts_and evidence_FBI Director James Comey
described in his public statement on July 5,_2016 and in testimony before the
Committee_on Oversight and Government_Reform on_July_7, 2016.

The key_portions
that_show Hillary_Clinton perjured herself was when she explained_in sworn
testimony_that she never sent or received_emails on her illicit_email_server.
With what the FBI described as_“extreme carelessness.” America’s national
security was put_at risk.

A retired
assistant FBI director,_and_28-year-veteran_of the bureau, said a_perjury
review is generally straightforward for agents.

“They_look at
the transcript_of the testimony they provided in light_of_what they know to be,
suspect to_be_the truth. They investigate both sides_and_take_the aggregate and
turn it over_to the prosecuting authority for a_decision,” Steven Pomerantz
said.

“Since the
Director (Comey