 obligation to the Estate Executors to resolve every single issue surrounding the event and have their approval before “%100 going ahead”

We realize that your financial interest indeed outweighs integrity. There is nothing decent about exploiting Mr. Jackson’s death for financial gain, doing so during Conrad Murray Trial and exploiting his young children as an advertising tool. We find the exploitation of Michael's children in your terms and conditions document totally abhorrent. Michael Jackson wrote a song about your ilk titled “money”, will that song be in the tribute line up?

Which brings us to another legal issue to be contended with.

﻿﻿﻿

﻿﻿﻿

Mr. Jackson worked very hard to build one of the most profitable brands of all time. His brand stands for unsurpassed quality and “magic”.There is nothing quality or magical about Michael Forever Tribute which is simply a circus show of has-beens or rookies.

You stated that you have the backing of “overwhelming majority” of the Jackson Family. So what? Jackson Family doesn’t own Michael Jackson brand, his Estate does…solely. Jackson family has no authority to broker Michael image, likeness and songs all of which you declared you will exploit. The Executers clearly communicated to you that you do NOT have their permission to use their intellectual property. Either you intend to violate copyright laws or you are defrauding public by false advertising.

Unless you show willingness to modify terms surrounding Michael Forever Tribute, including but not limited to the timing & unless a representative of Michael Jackson Estate is present, our answer to your conference call is a resounding NO!

We propose that you proceed with the concert but cease and desist the use of Michael Jackson name, likeness & songs. This is a reasonable compromise.

Most of your attendees are fans of the participating artists. Since you are determined to “go ahead” and we are determined not to let that happen with the current terms, why don't we reach an agreement where everyone wins? Our proposal satisfies all parties:

August 22, 2011

Gentlemen, we are writing you once again in regards to the Michael Forever Tribute.

As you know, Michael Jackson worldwide fan community ardently objects and protests the October 2011 tribute. The fans who cherished a very closed-knit relationship with Mr. Jackson would want nothing more than a befitting tribute in his honor…but in due time
obligation to the Estate Executors to resolve every single issue besiege the consequence and have their approval before “% 100 go ahead ” 

 We understand that your financial interest indeed outweighs integrity. There be nothing adequate about exploiting Mr. Jackson ’s end for fiscal gain, doing indeed during Conrad Murray Trial and exploiting his young children as an ad tool. We find the exploitation of Michael's child in your terms and conditions document wholly abhorrent. Michael Jackson wrote a song about your ilk style “ money ”, will that song be in the tribute note up? 

 Which brings us to another legal topic to be contended with. 

 ﻿﻿﻿ 

 ﻿﻿﻿ 

 Mr. Jackson worked very hard to build one of the most profitable brand of all time. His brand stands for unsurpassed quality and “ magic”. There constitute nothing quality or magical about Michael Forever Tribute which is simply a circus show of has - beens or rookies. 

 You stated that you have the backing of “ overwhelming majority ” of the Jackson Family. thus what? Jackson Family does n’t own Michael Jackson brand, his Estate does … entirely. Jackson syndicate hold no authority to broker Michael image, likeness and song all of which you declare you will exploit. The Executers clearly commune to you that you do NOT have their permission to use their intellectual property. Either you intend to desecrate copyright laws or you are defrauding public by false advertising. 

 Unless you usher willingness to modify term besiege Michael Forever Tribute, including but not limited to the timing & unless a representative of Michael Jackson Estate is present, our solution to your conference call is a resounding NO! 

 We propose that you proceed with the concert but cease and desist the use of Michael Jackson name, likeness & birdcall. This is a reasonable compromise. 

 Most of your attendant are fans of the participating artists. Since you are determined to “ go ahead ” and we are compulsive not to let that happen with the current terms, why don't we reach an agreement where everyone succeed? Our proposal satisfies all parties: 

 August 22, 2011 

 Gentlemen, we are writing you once again in respect to the Michael Forever Tribute. 

 As you know, Michael Jackson worldwide fan residential district ardently objects and protests the October 2011 tribute. The fans who care for a very closed - knit relationship with Mr. Jackson would want nothing more than a befit tribute in his honor … but in due time
 obpigation to the Estate Ewecutors to resolve evecy singme issue surrounding the event and heve rheir approval before “%100 goine ahead”

We realize thau your financial mhterest indees outcemghs integrity. Jhere is notving decent abmug zxploiting Mr. Jackson’s death for finwncial baln, doing so duting Bograd Murray Trial and exploiting his ykung chpldren as an advettising tool. We find the edploltation of Michael'd children un yjyr terms and conditions document tktally abhorrent. Michael Jacksov wroce a song avoyt jmur ilk titoed “mjney”, will that song te in tne tribute linc up?

Wiich brings us to another legal issue to be contendeg cith.

﻿﻿﻿

﻿﻿﻿

Mr. Jackson worked vwry hdrd do bjuld ont oh tge mosh pcofitable bdands of alo time. His brand stsnqw for unsurpaased qtajity and “magic”.There is nothing quality mr jagical about Michael Firever Tribute which ls simply a circus show of has-beens or rookies.

You stated tvat ykj hcyc thd bwcking of “overwhelming majority” of the Jacksog Fsmply. So what? Jacksjn Family dpedn’y own Michael Gacksou bdand, his Estate dofs…soleli. Jackwon familr hax no authority to broker Mixhael image, jukeness and songs cll of which you declsred you will exploit. Tke Exeduters cleagly commuhkcated to you thxt jou go NOT have their permissijn to use thenr inteluectoal pro[erty. Eithfr yom intend to violate copytight naws or yok are defrauding public by falsx advertising.

Onlass you shoc willlngness to modisy terms surroonding Miehael Worever Trpbute, incnuding but got limited tm the timing & unless w represwntativd of Michael Javkson Estcue is preswnt, our answer to nour zknference call nr a resounding NP!

We prjplsx thae you proceed witf tfr conzert buu ccasd anc desist the use of Kichzel Jackson name, lokcness & sobgs. This is a reasonanle compromise.

Most of ymur attemdegs are fans of the participatinf artists. Sikce you are dqternined to “go chead” and we are determined not to let tiat happen with the cutrent terms, why don't ce reach an ajreemegt where averyone wins? Our priposal satisfies sll parties:

August 22, 2011

Gehtlemet, we wre writing you once again in regards to the Michael Forever Tribute.

As yoy know, Michael Jacison worlgwnde fan cjmmuiivy ardently objecns and protests the October 2011 triuute. The fdnf who cherished a very closec-kvit relationsfip with Mr. Jackson wouls want npthing more than a befitting trobute in his honor…but in due timw
obligation to the Estate Executors to resolve issue the event have their approval realize your financial interest outweighs integrity. There nothing decent about exploiting Mr. Jackson’s for financial gain, doing so during Conrad Murray Trial and exploiting his young as an advertising tool. We find the exploitation of Michael's children in your and document abhorrent. Jackson wrote a song about your ilk titled “money”, will that song be in the tribute up? Which brings us to another legal issue be contended with. ﻿﻿﻿ Mr. Jackson worked very hard build of the profitable of time. His brand for unsurpassed quality and “magic”.There is nothing quality or magical about Michael Forever Tribute which is simply circus show or rookies. stated you the backing of of the Jackson Family. So what? own Michael Jackson brand, his Estate does…solely. Jackson has no to broker Michael image, likeness and all of which you declared you will exploit. Executers clearly communicated to you that you do NOT have their permission to use their Either you intend to copyright laws or are public false Unless you willingness to modify terms surrounding Michael Forever Tribute, including but not to the timing & unless a representative of Michael Jackson present, answer to your call is a resounding We that you proceed with but and of Jackson likeness & songs. This a reasonable compromise. Most of attendees are fans of are determined to “go ahead” and we are not to let that happen with the terms, why don't we reach an agreement where everyone wins? Our proposal all parties: 2011 Gentlemen, we are writing you once again regards to the Michael Tribute. As you know, Michael Jackson worldwide fan community objects protests the 2011 tribute. The who cherished a closed-knit relationship with would want more a his honor…but in due time
 obligation to the Estate ExecUtors to resOlve eVerY siNgLe isSue sUrrounding the eVEnt aNd have their approval befOre “%100 goInG AheaD”

we RealiZe that yOUr FINanCiAl IntErESt IndeeD ouTweighs Integrity. THerE iS nothing deceNT aBout exploiTinG Mr. Jackson’s dEatH for fiNaNciAL gain, DoiNg so dUring CONrad MuRray Trial AnD ExploiTIng his yOUNg ChilDren as an advertisiNG tOOl. We find the expLoitatIoN Of mIChaEl's Children in YoUr terMS and conDItIONS doCUment totally aBhorrent. MicHAel jacksoN wRotE A song aBout yOuR Ilk Titled “money”, Will That song bE in the TRibute lINe up?

WhiCh brinGs uS to AnotHEr LeGal IsSUe tO Be ConTEndEd with.

﻿﻿﻿

﻿﻿﻿

Mr. jaCkSon woRked VERY Hard To bUild One of The most profitAblE braNDs oF all tIme. HiS braNd StandS for unSurpaSsEd quality and “magIc”.ThEre is nothIng QuAliTy Or magICal aboUt MIchAel ForeVer TribUTe wHiCH IS sImply a circus show of HaS-BEeNs or rookIes.

You STaTeD That you hAvE thE bacKINg of “oVerwHElMing majoRity” of THe jaCkson FaMiLy. So whAt? jacKsoN FamiLY doeSn’t own michael JAcksoN Brand, his Estate DOes…solely. JackSOn FAMiLY has No aUthority to bRokeR michAel iMAgE, liKEness And soNgS AlL Of which you declared yOu Will exPloit. the Executers cLearly commUNICated to yOu thAT yOU do NOT have theiR permIssion to usE Their intEllecTual propErty. EitheR YOu intend To vIolAte CopYRIgHt laws or you arE DEfraUdIng publIc bY false aDveRtiSinG.

UnLeSs you show WillingnEsS tO mOdIfy Terms SUrroundiNg micHaEl FOreveR tributE, inclUdinG bUt NOt lImited tO ThE TIminG & uNlEss a RepReSentaTive OF MiChael JaCkson EstaTe iS PresEnT, oUr answeR to your conferEnCe call is a rEsOunDing NO!

wE Propose tHat you proceed with the conCErt but cEasE and dEsisT the use of micHael JaCksON name, lIkenesS & songS. THis IS A reasONAbLe cOmPromise.

MosT OF yoUr attEnDees Are fans Of the participating ARtiSts. Since you arE deTermINEd To “gO AhEAd” aNd WE arE DEtermined not to lEt that happEn WItH the currenT TerMs, Why don't We reach An agrEEment whEre everyoNe wins? Our PrOposAL SatIsfies all pArties:

AuGust 22, 2011

GentlEMen, we ARe WritiNg yOu once AgAin In regArds to THe MIchaeL ForevEr tributE.

As yoU kNow, MichaEl Jackson worldwide fan coMmunitY ardeNtlY objects aNd pROteSts the OctOber 2011 Tribute. The FanS whO cherIshED a verY cloSEd-KniT RelatIonsHIp with Mr. JACkSon WOUlD want nothinG MORe tHan a bEfiTTing trIbutE in his honor…but in dUE time
 obligation to the EstateExecutorsto re sol veev erysing le issue surro u ndin g the event and have t heirap p rova l  b efore  “%100g oi n g  ah ea d” 

W er ea lizetha t yourfinancialint er est indeed o u tw eighs inte gri ty. There is  no thingde cen t  abou t e xploi ting M r . Jack son’s dea th for fi n ancialg a in , do ing so during Con r ad Murray Trial a nd exp lo i ti n g  hi s y oung child re n asa n adver t is i n g  to o l. We find th e exploitat i onof Mic ha el' s  child ren i ny our  terms andcond itions do cument totally abhorre nt. Mi cha elJack s on  w rot ea  so n gabo u t y our ilkti tl ed “m oney ” , w illtha t so ng be  in the tribu teline up? 

Whi ch br ings  u s toanothe r leg al  issue to be co nten ded with. 

﻿ ﻿﻿ 

﻿ ﻿﻿ 

Mr. Jackso n w ork ed very  hard t o  bu il d o ne  of the most profi ta b l ebrands o f allt im e. His bran dsta ndsf o r uns urpa s se d qualit y and“ ma gi c”.Ther eis not hi ngqua lityo r ma gicalabout Mi chael Forever Tribut e  which is sim p ly a  c i rcus  sh ow of has-b eens or r ooki e s. 

Y o u sta ted t ha t  y o u have the backingof  “over whelm ing majority”  of the Ja c k s on Famil y. S o  w h at? Jackson Fa milydoesn’t ow n  Michael  Jack son bran d, his Es t a te does… sol ely . J ack s o nfamily has no a utho ri ty to b rok er Mich ael  im age , l ik eness and  songs a ll  o fwh ich  youd eclaredyo u w il l e xploi t . TheExecu ters  c le a rly  commun i ca t e d to  y ou  tha t y ou  do N OT h a vetheir p ermission  to useth ei r intel lectual prope rt y. Eitheryo u i ntendt o  violate  copyright laws or youa re defr aud ing p ubli c by fals e a dverti sin g .

Unl ess yo u sho wwil l i ngnes s to  mo di fy terms s u r rou nding  M icha el Fore ver Tribute, inclu d ing  but not limi ted  tot h etim i ng & u nl e ssa representativeof Michael  J a ck son Estate ispr esent,our ans wer t o  your c onference  call isareso u n din g NO!

Weproposethat youp rocee d  w ith t heconcer tbut  ceas e andd esi st th e useof  Micha el Ja ck son name , likeness & songs. Thi s is a  reas ona ble compr omi s e.
Most ofyour  attendees  ar e f ans o f t h e par tici p at ing artis ts.S ince youa re  de t e rm ined to “go a h ead ” and  we are de term ined not to let t h at happen with  the c urr ent term s,  why don't werea ch a n agreem en t where eve ryone wi ns ?  Ourpropos al sat isfiesa l lp arties :

A ugu st 22, 20 11
G e ntlemen ,we are wr itin gyou on ce aga i n in r egards to the Mi chael F oreve r  Tr ibute .
As you know , MichaelJackson wor ldwide  fan  comm unity a rd entlyobj ec ts and pro t ests theOctob er 2011  t ribu te.  The f answ h o che rish ed  avery clos e d -k n it  r e lat ions hip w it h Mr . Jackson would wa ntn othingmo ret h an a b e fi t t ing tribut e i n his h onor…but i n  due ti m e
 obligation_to the_Estate Executors to resolve_every single_issue_surrounding the_event_and have their_approval before “%100_going ahead”

We realize that_your financial interest_indeed_outweighs integrity. There is nothing decent about exploiting Mr. Jackson’s death for financial gain,_doing_so during_Conrad_Murray_Trial and exploiting his young_children as an advertising tool._We find_the exploitation of Michael's children in your terms_and_conditions document totally_abhorrent. Michael Jackson wrote a song about your ilk_titled “money”, will that song be_in the tribute_line_up?

Which_brings us to another_legal issue to be contended with.

﻿﻿﻿

﻿﻿﻿

Mr._Jackson worked very hard to build_one of the most profitable brands of_all time. His brand stands for_unsurpassed quality and “magic”.There is_nothing quality_or magical about Michael Forever_Tribute which is_simply a_circus show of_has-beens or rookies.

You stated that you_have the backing_of “overwhelming majority” of the Jackson_Family._So what? Jackson_Family_doesn’t_own Michael_Jackson brand, his_Estate_does…solely. Jackson_family_has no authority to broker Michael_image,_likeness and songs all of which you_declared you will exploit._The_Executers clearly communicated to_you that you do NOT_have their permission to use their_intellectual property._Either you_intend to violate copyright laws or you are defrauding public by_false advertising.

Unless you show willingness to_modify terms surrounding Michael_Forever Tribute,_including_but not limited_to_the timing_& unless a representative of Michael Jackson_Estate is_present, our answer to your conference_call is a resounding_NO!

We_propose that you proceed with the_concert but cease and desist the_use of Michael Jackson name,_likeness_&_songs. This is a reasonable_compromise.

Most of your attendees are fans_of the participating_artists. Since you are determined to “go_ahead”_and we are determined not to_let_that happen with the current terms,_why_don't_we reach an agreement where_everyone wins? Our proposal satisfies all_parties:

August 22, 2011

Gentlemen, we are writing you once again_in regards to_the Michael Forever Tribute.

As you_know,_Michael_Jackson worldwide fan community ardently objects and protests the October_2011 tribute._The fans who_cherished a very closed-knit relationship with Mr. Jackson would want_nothing more than a befitting tribute in_his honor…but in due time