 striking down restrictions on early-term abortions that is substantially more convincing than Justice Harry Blackmun’s famously artless opinion itself.”

So, in 1992, when Kennedy and the High Court had a chance to review the opinion in Planned Parenthood v. Casey, it was reasonable to expect this deformed legal aberration would be discarded. It nearly was, as Kennedy is said to have been persuaded to change sides. In the end, he produced his unique and inventive brand of judicial mysticism.

“At the heart of liberty,” Kennedy wrote in Casey, “is the right to define one's own concept of existence, of meaning, of the universe, and of the mystery of human life.”'

And I'm with conservatives against judicial activism insofar as legislating from the bench is concerned, but wouldn't it be nice if the courts were less passive about enforcing the Constitution against the untrammeled, breakneck expansion of the federal government into every aspect of our lives, steamrolling over the constitutional guarantees of liberty every step of the way?

VII.

So back to the "Affordable Care Act," named as it is in the most astonishingly Orwellian fashion. There can be no getting around the fact that ObamaCare is unconstitutional because there is no enumerated power of the federal government in Article I or II of the Constitution allowing for it to compel its citizens to purchase insurance. That's even more of a mirage in the rightfully barren desert of constitutionally enumerated powers than the right to abort is a hallucination of guaranteed protections.

Okay now, MAGA hats: for the million dollar grand prize, the all expenses paid vacation to Ambergris Caye, and the neeeww car– which Supreme Court Justice was the swing vote that incredibly upheld ObamaCare as perfectly within the bounds of the U.S. Constitution? And the answer is....

Chief Justice John Roberts!
Appointed by REPUBLICAN President George W. Bush!

And the million dollar grand prize, all expenses paid vacation, and new car go to some big wig health insurance executive.

But it gets even better. Come stand at the edge of the abyss with me and peer in. Do you remember what John Robert's legal argument was as to why ObamaCare was constitutional?

Oh it's bitterly absurd. If this shit doesn't redpill you into complete despairing disillusionment with the entire federal system and the farce of constitutional government there
striking down restrictions on early - term abortions that is well more convincing than Justice Harry Blackmun ’s excellently ingenuous opinion itself. ” 

 So, in 1992, when Kennedy and the High Court had a luck to review the opinion in Planned Parenthood v. Casey, it was reasonable to have a bun in the oven this deform legal aberration would be discard. It about was, as Kennedy is said to have been persuade to change sides. In the conclusion, he grow his unique and inventive brand of judicial mysticism. 

 “ At the heart of autonomy, ” Kennedy wrote in Casey, “ is the right to define one's own concept of universe, of meaning, of the universe, and of the mystery of human life. ”' 

 And I'm with conservatives against judicial activism insofar as legislate from the bench is concern, but wouldn't it be nice if the courts were less passive about enforcing the Constitution against the untrammeled, breakneck expansion of the union government into every aspect of our lives, steamrolling over the constitutional guarantees of familiarity every step of the way? 

 VII. 

 So back to the " Affordable Care Act, " named as it is in the most astonishingly Orwellian fashion. There can be no getting around the fact that ObamaCare is unconstitutional because there is no enumerated power of the union politics in Article I or II of the Constitution allowing for it to compel its citizens to purchase policy. That's even more of a mirage in the rightfully barren desert of constitutionally enumerated powers than the right field to abort is a hallucination of undertake protections. 

 Okay now, MAGA hat: for the million dollar grand prize, the all expenses paid vacation to Ambergris Caye, and the neeeww car – which Supreme Court Justice was the swing right to vote that incredibly upheld ObamaCare as perfectly within the bounds of the U.S. Constitution? And the answer is.... 

 Chief Justice John Roberts! 
 Appointed by REPUBLICAN President George W. Bush! 

 And the million dollar exalted prize, all expenses paid vacation, and new car function to some big wig health insurance executive. 

 But it get even better. Come stand at the boundary of the abyss with me and peer in. Do you remember what John Robert's legal argument was as to why ObamaCare was constitutional? 

 Oh it's bitterly absurd. If this shit doesn't redpill you into accomplished despairing disillusionment with the integral federal system and the farce of constitutional politics there
 stgiking down restrictions on early-term ayirtionv that is subsgantially more convincing then Jystict Harry Blackmun’s fxmously agtless opunioi itself.”

So, in 1992, wisn Kenncby ans the Iigh Court had s chance tm review the o[iviln in Planned Parenthood v. Casey, it was resslnable to expest tnys dsformed legal aberration would be siscardtd. It nearly was, ax Kennedy is said to have heen persuaded to chanhe sides. In the wnd, he produzed his unpxue and inbentive brand of judicial mystizism.

“Ac the heart od llterty,” Kennevy wrone in Casey, “is the richt to cefine one's owk conrept of existence, of meanmng, of the universe, wnd of tha jystery of human oide.”'

And I'm fith xonrerbavivss agalnsv judicial zctivism inwofar as legislatinb sgpm the bench is cogcqrned, but wouldn't it be nice if the cougts sere less passive about enforcing the Constijution agaynst the untrammeled, breakneck expansion of the faderam gorcvnmevr lnto every aspect of our lives, steamrolling odsr tme constitutionaj guaranteex lf jiberty every step of fhe way?

VII.

So back ho the "Wfforeable Cart Act," named as it is in the most astonishingjt Orwellian fashiou. There can ye no bettimg around the fact that ObajaCare is ujconstitufkonal because thdre iv no enumerated power of tre federao gorernment in Srticlq I or II lf thc Constitution alloaing yor id to compep its citizens to purchase insucence. That's evgn korv of a mixage ik the rightfullr barren deserj of conscitutiunally enujerated powers thag the right tm abort is a iallucinaeion of tuarantddd protections.

Pkay now, MAGA hats: dor the million doklat frand prize, the alo expenses paid vazatyoj vo Amfargris Caye, dnd ghe meeewd car– which Ruprrme Court Justice wav ths swing vote that ongredibly opheld ObwmaCare as petfectly within the bounvs of vhe U.S. Cogstitution? And the answer is....

Chjef Justife Mohn Roberts!
A[poikted by REPUBLNCAN President George W. Bush!

And the millmon dollar grand prize, qll expenses paid vccstion, and nxw car go to soke big wig health inwurance executive.

Nut it gets even betted. Come stanf at the edge of the abyss with me and peer in. Do you remember what John Eobert's legal argujent was ds co why JbameCere was constitutponal?

Oh it's bitterly absurd. If tiis shit dmefn't redpill you into completr aespairing dirillusionment with the ehtire feceral system and the farce of cpnstitutional government there
striking down restrictions on early-term abortions that more than Justice Blackmun’s famously artless when and the High had a chance review the opinion in Planned Parenthood Casey, it was reasonable to expect this deformed legal aberration would be discarded. nearly was, as Kennedy is said to have been persuaded to change sides. the he his and inventive brand of judicial mysticism. “At the heart of liberty,” Kennedy wrote in Casey, “is right to define one's own concept of existence, meaning, of the universe, of the mystery of human And with conservatives judicial insofar legislating from the is concerned, but wouldn't it be nice if the courts were less passive about enforcing the Constitution the untrammeled, of the government every of our lives, the constitutional guarantees of liberty every way? VII. So back to the "Affordable Care named as is in the most astonishingly Orwellian There can be no getting around the fact ObamaCare is unconstitutional because there is no enumerated power of the federal government in Article II of the Constitution for it to its to insurance. even more a mirage in the rightfully barren desert of constitutionally enumerated powers the right to abort is a hallucination of guaranteed protections. MAGA for the million grand prize, the all paid to Ambergris Caye, and car– Supreme the vote incredibly upheld ObamaCare as within the bounds of the Constitution? And the answer Appointed by REPUBLICAN President George W. Bush! And million dollar grand prize, all expenses paid and new car go to some big wig health insurance executive. But gets even stand at the edge of the abyss with and peer in. Do remember what John Robert's legal argument was as to ObamaCare constitutional? Oh bitterly absurd. If shit doesn't redpill into complete despairing the entire system the government there
 striking down restrictions oN early-term AbortIonS thAt Is suBstaNtially more conVInciNg than Justice Harry BlacKmun’s FaMOuslY ArTless Opinion ITsELF.”

So, In 1992, WhEn KEnNEdY and tHe HIgh CourT had a chancE to ReView the opiniON iN Planned PaRenThood v. Casey, iT waS reasoNaBle TO expeCt tHis deFormed LEgal abErration wOuLD be disCArded. It NEArLy waS, as Kennedy is said tO HaVE been persuaded To chanGe SIdES. in tHe eNd, he producEd His unIQue and iNVeNTIVe bRAnd of judicial Mysticism.

“At THe hEart of LiBerTY,” KenneDy wroTe IN CaSey, “is the rigHt to Define one'S own coNCept of eXIstence, Of meanIng, Of tHe unIVeRsE, anD oF The MYsTerY Of hUman life.”'

anD I'M with ConsERVATiveS agAinsT judiCial activism iNsoFar aS LegIslatIng frOm thE bEnch iS conceRned, bUt Wouldn't it be nice If thE courts weRe lEsS paSsIve abOUt enfoRciNg tHe ConstItution AGaiNsT THE uNtrammeled, breaknecK eXPAnSion of thE federAL gOvERnment inTo EveRy asPECt of oUr liVEs, SteamrolLing ovER tHe ConstitUtIonal gUaRanTeeS of liBErty Every sTep of the Way?

VIi.

so back to the "AffORdable Care Act," NAmED As IT is iN thE most astoniShinGLy OrWellIAn FasHIon. ThEre caN bE No GEtting around the fact ThAt ObamACare Is unconstitutIonal becauSE THere is no EnumERaTEd power of the feDeral Government IN Article i or II Of the ConStitution ALLowing foR it To cOmpEl iTS CiTizens to purchASE insUrAnce. ThaT's eVen more Of a MirAge In tHe RightfullY barren dEsErT oF cOnsTitutIOnally enUmEraTeD poWers tHAn the rIght tO aboRt Is A HalLucinatIOn OF GuarAnTeEd prOteCtIons.

OKay nOW, MAgA hats: fOr the millIon DOllaR gRaNd prize, The all expenseS pAid vacatioN tO AmBergriS cAye, and thE neeeww car– which Supreme COUrt JustIce Was thE swiNg vote thaT inCredibLy uPHeld ObAmaCarE as peRfEctLY WithiN THe BouNdS of the U.S. CoNSTitUtion? anD the Answer iS....

Chief Justice John ROBerTs!
Appointed by rEPuBLIcan PResIDeNT GeOrGE W. BUSH!

And the million dOllar grand PrIZe, All expenseS PaiD vAcation, And new cAr go tO Some big Wig health Insurance ExEcutIVE.

BuT it gets eveN better. COme stand aT The edGE oF the aBysS with mE aNd pEer in. do you rEMemBer whAt John roBert's lEgal aRgUment was As to why ObamaCare was consTitutiOnal?

OH it'S bitterly AbsURd. IF this shit DoesN't redpill yOu iNto ComplEte DEspaiRing DIsIllUSionmEnt wITh the entiRE fEdeRAL sYstem and the FARCe oF consTitUTional GoveRnment there
 striking down restriction s on early -term  ab ort io ns t hatis substantial l y mo re convincing than Jus ticeHa r ry B l ac kmun’ s famou s ly a rtl es sopi ni o nitsel f.” 

So, i n 1992, wh enKe nnedy and th e  H igh Courthad  a chance to  re view t he  op i nioninPlann ed Par e nthood  v. Casey ,i t wasr easonab l e  t o ex pect this deforme d  l e gal aberration  would  b e  d i s car ded . It nearl ywas,a s Kenne d yi s sai d  to have been  persuadedt o c hangesi des .  In th e end ,h e p roduced his  uni que and i nventi v e brand of judi cial m yst ici sm.“A tthe  h e art of  li b ert y,” Kenn ed ywrote  inC a s e y, “ istheright  to define on e's  own con ceptof ex iste nc e, of  meani ng, o fthe universe, a nd o f the mys ter yofhu man l i fe.”'
An d I 'm with  conser v ati ve s a ga inst judicial acti vi s m  i nsofar a s legi s la ti n g from t he  be nchi s  conc erne d ,but woul dn't i t  b enice if  t he cou rt s w ere  less pass ive ab out enfo rcing the Constituti o n against the un t r am m eled , b reakneck ex pans i on o f th e  f ede r al go vernm en t  i n to every aspect ofou r live s, st eamrolling ov er the con s t i tutional  gua r an t ees of liberty  ever y step oft he way?
VII. 

So bac k to the" A ffordabl e C are  Ac t," n am ed as it is i n themo st asto nis hinglyOrw ell ian  fa sh ion. Ther e can be  n oge tt ing  arou n d the fa ct  th at  Ob amaCa r e is u ncons titu ti on a l b ecauset he r e  isno  e nume rat ed  powe r of the  federa l governm ent in A rt ic le I or  II of the Co ns titution a ll owi ng for i t to com pel its citizens to pur c hase in sur ance.  Tha t's evenmor e of a  mi r age in  the r ightf ul lyb a rrend e se rtof  constitut i o nal ly en um erat ed powe rs than the rightt o a bort is a hal luc inat i o nofg ua r ant ee d  pr o t ections.

Okaynow, MAGAha t s:  for the m i lli on  dollar  grandprize ,  the al l expense s paid va ca tion t o A mbergris C aye, and  the neee w w car –  w hichSup reme C ou rtJusti ce was the  swin g vote  t hat in credi bl y upheld  ObamaCare as perfectly  withi n the  bo unds of t heU .S.  Constitu tion ? And theans wer  is.. ..Chief  Jus t ic e J o hn Ro bert s !
Appoint e dbyR E PU BLICAN Pres i d e ntGeorg e W .  Bush! 

An d the million dol l ar grand prize , al l exp ens e s pa id  vacation, and  ne wc a r go toso me big wighealth i ns u rance  execu tive.
But it g et s  evenbett er.  Come sta ndat the edg eof the ab ysswi th meand pe e r in . Do you rememberwhatJ o hn Ro b ert 's le ga l argum e nt w as as to w hy ObamaCar e wascons titut ional?
O h it's  bi tt erly absur d . If this  shit  doesn' tredp ill  you i ntoc o mplet e de sp air ing disil l u si o nm en t  wi th t he en ti re f ederal sy s tem andthe farce o fcon s t itutio n al g overnmentthe re
 striking_down restrictions_on early-term abortions that_is substantially_more_convincing than_Justice_Harry Blackmun’s famously_artless opinion itself.”

So,_in 1992, when Kennedy_and the High_Court_had a chance to review the opinion in Planned Parenthood v. Casey, it was_reasonable_to expect_this_deformed_legal aberration would be discarded._It nearly was, as Kennedy_is said_to have been persuaded to change sides. In_the_end, he produced_his unique and inventive brand of judicial mysticism.

“At the_heart of liberty,” Kennedy wrote in_Casey, “is the_right_to_define one's own concept_of existence, of meaning, of the_universe, and of the mystery of_human life.”'

And I'm with conservatives against judicial_activism insofar as legislating from the_bench is concerned, but wouldn't_it be_nice if the courts were_less passive about_enforcing the_Constitution against the_untrammeled, breakneck expansion of the federal_government into every_aspect of our lives, steamrolling over_the_constitutional guarantees of_liberty_every_step of_the way?

VII.

So back_to_the "Affordable_Care_Act," named as it is in_the_most astonishingly Orwellian fashion. There can be_no getting around the_fact_that ObamaCare is unconstitutional_because there is no enumerated_power of the federal government in_Article I_or II_of the Constitution allowing for it to compel its citizens to_purchase insurance. That's even more of_a mirage in the_rightfully barren_desert_of constitutionally enumerated_powers_than the_right to abort is a hallucination of_guaranteed protections.

Okay_now, MAGA hats: for the million_dollar grand prize, the_all_expenses paid vacation to Ambergris Caye,_and the neeeww car– which Supreme_Court Justice was the swing_vote_that_incredibly upheld ObamaCare as perfectly_within the bounds of the U.S._Constitution? And the_answer is....

Chief Justice John Roberts!
Appointed by REPUBLICAN_President_George W. Bush!

And the million dollar_grand_prize, all expenses paid vacation, and_new_car_go to some big wig_health insurance executive.

But it gets even_better. Come stand at the edge of the abyss_with me and_peer in. Do you remember_what_John_Robert's legal argument was as to why ObamaCare was constitutional?

Oh_it's bitterly_absurd. If this_shit doesn't redpill you into complete despairing disillusionment with the_entire federal system and the farce of_constitutional government there