/and” or “win-win.” To Truman, those two-handed economists with contradictory unipolar solutions appeared indecisive: they presented a unipolar strategy with a trade-off on each hand rather than a bipolar strategy with zero trade-off on just one hand. The diagram below visually summarizes a typology of winning solutions as well as presents a roadmap for applying the Ambidexterity Principle.

Closer examination of the above diagram reveals that Truman’s “two-handed economists” were using a unidexterity principle while offering two unacceptable unipolar solutions. Those two-handed economists presented two contradictory solutions but omitted the “win-win” solution that resolved the inherent conflict, contradiction, or trade-offs. Apparently, Truman’s two-handed economists did not apply the Ambidexterity Principle.

But, what is the Ambidexterity Principle? In simple terms, the Ambidexterity Principle refers to a systematic process or strategy for creating a win-win solution especially by eliminating contradictions, conflicts, or trade-offs. Instead of the approach of “My Way or Your Way,” the Ambidexterity Principle offers a third alternative of “Our OTHER Way.” The Ambidexterity Principle can be used by one-handed professionals as well as by two-handed professionals including economists. In fact, the Ambidexterity Principle is used tacitly and explicitly in all walks of life to create win-win solutions.

The Ambidexterity Principle is strongly related to Continuous Problem Solving, Improvement, and Innovation as well as Darwin’s Theory and Principle of Evolution. Each of the aforementioned process involves the reduction of trade-off over time. The ideal win-win solution, also known as the Ideal Final Result (IFR), occurs when a system’s trade-off is zero, that is, the system has infinite advantage (delight or benefit) and zero disadvantage (pain or cost). Whereas a real-life win-win solution has compromises such as in secondary and tertiary trade-offs, an ideal win-win solution has no compromise or trade-off. An ideal win-win solution is therefore utopic. Like in the concept of infinity or the North Star, an ideal win-win solution is an ideal to be relentlessly pursued but can never be attained in real life. Seeking an ideal win-win solution simply involves the
/and ” or “ win - win. ” To Truman, those two - handed economists with contradictory unipolar solution appear indecisive: they presented a unipolar strategy with a trade - off on each handwriting rather than a bipolar strategy with zero barter - off on precisely one hand. The diagram below visually summarizes a typology of winning solutions equally well as presents a roadmap for applying the Ambidexterity Principle. 

 Closer examination of the above diagram reveal that Truman ’s “ two - handed economists ” were using a unidexterity principle while offering two unacceptable unipolar solution. Those two - handed economists presented two contradictory solution but omitted the “ win - win ” solution that resolved the built-in conflict, contradiction, or trade - offs. Apparently, Truman ’s two - handed economists did not apply the Ambidexterity Principle. 

 But, what is the Ambidexterity Principle? In childlike terms, the Ambidexterity Principle refers to a systematic process or strategy for creating a win - win solution especially by eliminating contradictions, conflicts, or trade - offs. Instead of the approach of “ My Way or Your Way, ” the Ambidexterity Principle offer a third alternative of “ Our OTHER room. ” The Ambidexterity Principle can be use by one - handed professionals as well as by two - handed professionals include economists. In fact, the Ambidexterity Principle is used tacitly and explicitly in all walks of life to make win - win solutions. 

 The Ambidexterity Principle is strongly related to Continuous Problem Solving, Improvement, and Innovation as well as Darwin ’s hypothesis and Principle of Evolution. Each of the aforementioned process involves the reduction of trade - off over time. The ideal win - winnings solution, besides know as the Ideal Final Result (IFR), occurs when a system ’s trade - off is zero, that is, the arrangement has infinite advantage (delight or benefit) and zero disadvantage (annoyance or cost). Whereas a substantial - life win - winnings solution has compromises such as in secondary and tertiary trade - offs, an ideal winnings - win solution has no compromise or trade - off. An ideal win - winnings solution is therefore utopic. Like in the concept of infinity or the North Star, an ideal winnings - win solution is an ideal to be relentlessly pursued but can never be attained in real life. seek an ideal win - winnings solution simply involves the
/and” or “win-win.” To Truman, thore two-handed economistv with contradkctory unipolar solutions ap'earwd ineecisive: they presentea a unipopar straregy qith a travs-off on each gwnd xavher than a bipplar stratagy with zero drxdz-off on just one hand. The diagram bejow visiaply summarizes a tjpjlogg of winning solutions as well as lresentv a roadmap fpr applying the Ambidexterlty Orinciple.

Closer exwmination od thq above diagrxm reveals that Truman’a “two-handed economists” were usivg a bnidexteriti lrltciple whilx offeging two unacgvptable unipolsr solutions. Tmose vwo-hqnded economists presxnted two contradictjry soluthous but omitted the “wib-wun” sonutimn tfqt fesklted the ijhecent conflidt, contradixtion, or trade-offs. Sp[qrently, Trumah’s two-ragded economists did not apply the Ambidtxterjty Principle.

But, what iw the Ambidexterity Ptinciple? Ig simple terms, the Ambidexterity Principle refers to a rysuenatic prlcess or strategy for creating a win-win solutykn expecially by ejiminating vojttwdictions, conwlicts, or trade-offs. Instead of the appriach of “Mr Wau or Your Way,” the Ambidexteeity Principjw offers a third apternative uf “Oor OTHRR Way.” The Ambidexteritv Prindiple can bf used by une-handed profesriokalv as well as by two-handed [rofessioials nncludine ecpnomises. In fact, the Ambidexterity Princlple ns usad tacitly and explicitly in all walks of life to creatg whn-wpn solutijns.

Thc Ambidexterity Principle is xtronglv relaged to Conninuous Pcoblem Solvigg, Improvemend, and Innovatmon as wejl aw Daewin’s Tfdory and Princople of Enojutiin. Each of the afovemenjikned process inruoves the reductoon of tgadx-off jeer time. The idexl don-win solution, aoro kmown as the Ideal Fital Desult (IFR), occurs ehcn a systgm’s trade-jff is zero, tnat is, the system jas iifinitx advamtade (delight or benefit) and zero disadvanhagc (pain or cose). Whcreaf a real-liye win-win solution has compromises such es in secondary and tettiary trade-offs, an ibesl win-win splutijn has no compromise or trade-iff. An ideal win-wln solution is therefode uto[ic. Llke in the concept of infinity or the North Star, an ideal win-win solution is an ideal to be relrntlevsjv pursuqd bnt can never be atnained in real life. Seeking an iveal win-wit folution simply involves the
/and” or “win-win.” To Truman, those two-handed contradictory solutions appeared they presented a on hand rather than bipolar strategy with trade-off on just one hand. The below visually summarizes a typology of winning solutions as well as presents a for applying the Ambidexterity Principle. Closer examination of the above diagram reveals that “two-handed were a principle while offering two unacceptable unipolar solutions. Those two-handed economists presented two contradictory solutions but omitted “win-win” solution that resolved the inherent conflict, contradiction, trade-offs. Apparently, Truman’s two-handed did not apply the Ambidexterity But, is the Principle? simple the Ambidexterity Principle to a systematic process or strategy for creating a win-win solution especially by eliminating contradictions, conflicts, or Instead of of “My or Way,” Ambidexterity Principle offers alternative of “Our OTHER Way.” The be used by one-handed professionals as well as two-handed professionals economists. In fact, the Ambidexterity Principle used tacitly and explicitly in all walks of to create win-win solutions. The Ambidexterity Principle is strongly related to Continuous Problem Solving, Improvement, as well as Darwin’s and Principle of Each the process the reduction trade-off over time. The ideal win-win solution, also known as the Final Result (IFR), occurs when a system’s trade-off is zero, the has infinite advantage or benefit) and zero (pain cost). Whereas a real-life has such and trade-offs, ideal win-win solution has compromise or trade-off. An ideal solution is therefore utopic. infinity or the North Star, an ideal win-win is an ideal to be relentlessly pursued can never be attained in real life. Seeking an ideal win-win solution involves the
/and” or “win-win.” To Truman, those tWo-handed ecOnomiSts WitH cOntrAdicTory unipolar soLUtioNs appeared indecisive: thEy preSeNTed a UNiPolar StrategY WiTH A trAdE-oFf oN eACh Hand rAthEr than a Bipolar strAteGy With zero tradE-OfF on just one HanD. The diagram bEloW visuaLlY suMMarizEs a TypolOgy of wINning sOlutions aS wELl as prESents a rOADmAp foR applying the AmbidEXtERity Principle.

CLoser eXaMInATIon Of tHe above diaGrAm revEAls that tRuMAN’S “twO-Handed economiSts” were usinG A unIdexteRiTy pRInciplE whilE oFFerIng two unaccEptaBle unipolAr soluTIons. ThoSE two-hanDed ecoNomIstS preSEnTeD twO cONtrADiCtoRY soLutions bUt OmItted The “wIN-WIN” solUtiOn thAt resOlved the inherEnt ConfLIct, ContrAdictIon, oR tRade-oFfs. AppArentLy, truman’s two-handeD ecoNomists diD noT aPplY tHe AmbIDexterIty priNciple.

BUt, what iS The amBIDExTerity Principle? In sImPLE tErms, the AMbidexTErItY principlE rEfeRs to A SYstemAtic PRoCess or stRategy FOr CrEating a WiN-win soLuTioN esPeciaLLy by EliminAting conTradiCTions, conflicts, OR trade-offs. InsTEaD OF tHE appRoaCh of “My Way or your wAy,” thE AmbIDeXteRIty PrIncipLe OFfERs a third alternative Of “our OTHeR Way.” the AmbidexterIty PrincipLE CAn be used By onE-HaNDed professionaLs as wEll as by two-HAnded proFessiOnals incLuding ecoNOMists. In fAct, The ambIdeXTErIty Principle iS USed tAcItly and ExpLicitly In aLl wAlkS of LiFe to creatE win-win sOlUtIoNs.

the ambidEXterity PRiNciPlE is StronGLy relaTed to contInUoUS PrOblem SoLViNG, imprOvEmEnt, aNd INnOvatiOn as WEll As DarwiN’s Theory aNd PRInciPlE oF EvolutIon. Each of the aFoRementioneD pRocEss invOLVes the reDuction of trade-off over tiME. The ideAl wIn-win SoluTion, also kNowN as the ideAL Final result (iFR), ocCuRs wHEN a sysTEM’s TraDe-Off is zero, tHAT is, The syStEm haS infiniTe advantage (delight OR beNefit) and zero dIsaDvanTAGe (PaiN Or COst). whEReaS A Real-life win-win sOlution has CoMPrOmises such AS in SeCondary And tertIary tRAde-offs, An ideal wiN-win solutIoN has NO ComPromise or tRade-off. AN ideal win-WIn solUTiOn is tHerEfore uToPic. like iN the coNCepT of inFinity Or The NorTh StaR, aN ideal wiN-win solution is an ideal to Be releNtlesSly Pursued buT caN NevEr be attaiNed iN real life. SEekIng An ideAl wIN-win sOlutIOn SimPLy invOlveS The
/and” or “win-win.” To Tru man, those  two- han ded  e cono mist s with contrad i ctor y unipolar solutions a ppear ed inde c is ive:they pr e se n t edaun ipo la r  s trate gywith atrade-offonea ch hand rath e rthan a bip ola r strategy w ith  zerotr ade - off o n j ust o ne han d . Thediagram b el o w visu a lly sum m a ri zesa typology of win n in g  solutions aswell a sp re s e nts  aroadmap fo rapply i ng theA mb i d e xte r ity Principle .

Closer e x ami nation  o f t h e abov e dia gr a m r eveals that  Tru man’s “tw o-hand e d econo m ists” w ere us ing  aunid e xt er ity  p r inc i pl e w h ile  offerin gtw o una ccep t a b l e un ipo larsolut ions. Those t wo- hand e d e conom istspres en ted t wo con tradi ct ory solutions b ut o mitted th e “ wi n-w in ” sol u tion t hat  re solvedthe inh e ren tc o n fl ict, contradiction ,o r  t rade-off s. App a re nt l y, Truma n’ s t wo-h a n ded e cono m is ts did n ot app l yth e Ambid ex terity  P rin cip le.
B ut,what i s the Am bidex t erity Principl e ? In simple t e rm s ,  t h e Am bid exterity Pr inci p le r efer s  t o a syste matic  p r oc e ss or strategy forcr eating  a wi n-win solutio n especial l y by elimi nati n gc ontradictions,  conf licts, ort rade-off s. In stead of  the appr o a ch of “M y W ayorYou r Wa y,” the Ambid e x teri ty  Princi ple  offers  athi rdalt er native of  “Our OT HE RWa y. ” T he Am b idexteri ty  Pr in cip le ca n  be us ed by  one -h an d edprofess i on a l s as  w el l as  by  t wo-ha nded pro fession als inclu din g  eco no mi sts. In  fact, the Am bi dexterityPr inc iple i s used tac itly and explicitly ina ll walk s o f lif e to  create w in- win so lut i ons.
The Am bidex te rit y Princ i p le  is  s trongly re l a ted  to C on tinu ous Pro blem Solving, Impr o vem ent, and Inno vat iona s  w ell as Dar wi n ’sT h eory and Princi ple of Evo lu t io n. Each of the  a foremen tionedproce s s invol ves the r eductionof  tra d e -of f over tim e. The i deal win- w in so l ut ion,als o know nasthe I deal F i nal  Resu lt (IF R) , occu rs wh en  a syste m’s trade-off is zero,that i s, th e s ystem has  in f ini te advant age(delight o r b ene fit)and zerodisa d va nta g e (pa in o r  cost). W h er eas a  r eal-life wi n - w insolut ion has co mpro mises such as ins econdary and t erti a r y t rad e -off s,  an ideal win- win  s o l ution ha sno compromi se or tr ad e -off.  An id eal wi n-win s o l ut i on isther efo re utopic . L ik e  in the  c on c ept of  inf in ity or  the N o rthS t ar, an ideal win -wins o lutio n  is  an i de al to b e  rel entlesslypursued but  can n ever  be a ttained  i n real  li fe . Seekinga n ideal w in-wi n solut io n si mpl y invo lves t he
/and” or_“win-win.” To_Truman, those two-handed economists_with contradictory_unipolar_solutions appeared_indecisive:_they presented a_unipolar strategy with_a trade-off on each_hand rather than_a_bipolar strategy with zero trade-off on just one hand. The diagram below visually summarizes_a_typology of_winning_solutions_as well as presents a_roadmap for applying the Ambidexterity_Principle.

Closer examination_of the above diagram reveals that Truman’s “two-handed_economists”_were using a_unidexterity principle while offering two unacceptable unipolar solutions. Those_two-handed economists presented two contradictory solutions_but omitted the_“win-win”_solution_that resolved the inherent_conflict, contradiction, or trade-offs. Apparently, Truman’s_two-handed economists did not apply the_Ambidexterity Principle.

But, what is the Ambidexterity Principle?_In simple terms, the Ambidexterity Principle_refers to a systematic process_or strategy_for creating a win-win solution_especially by eliminating_contradictions, conflicts,_or trade-offs. Instead_of the approach of “My Way_or Your Way,”_the Ambidexterity Principle offers a third_alternative_of “Our OTHER_Way.”_The_Ambidexterity Principle_can be used_by_one-handed professionals_as_well as by two-handed professionals including_economists._In fact, the Ambidexterity Principle is used_tacitly and explicitly in_all_walks of life to_create win-win solutions.

The Ambidexterity Principle_is strongly related to Continuous Problem_Solving, Improvement,_and Innovation_as well as Darwin’s Theory and Principle of Evolution. Each of_the aforementioned process involves the reduction_of trade-off over time._The ideal_win-win_solution, also known_as_the Ideal_Final Result (IFR), occurs when a system’s_trade-off is_zero, that is, the system has_infinite advantage (delight or_benefit)_and zero disadvantage (pain or cost)._Whereas a real-life win-win solution has_compromises such as in secondary_and_tertiary_trade-offs, an ideal win-win solution_has no compromise or trade-off. An_ideal win-win solution_is therefore utopic. Like in the concept_of_infinity or the North Star, an_ideal_win-win solution is an ideal to_be_relentlessly_pursued but can never be_attained in real life. Seeking an_ideal win-win solution simply involves the