.

And I don’t even want to imagine how unbending China, with its increasing assertiveness in the world order, is going to get hereafter. The country clamped down on Google and Facebook, paranoiad as they are on security breaches and information crossing borders. This is a whole different level even for them to react to!!

¯ US’ diplomatic and state officials are bound to be under greater suspicion, hence scrutiny, may risk expulsion and will certainly be blocked from carrying out their duties smoothly. I wonder why these officials were looped in when they have had no training or expertise in clandestine methods of “Humint”, a spy-world jargon for human intelligence collection, NYT explains.

¯ There will be a rise in counter-intelligence on US, its agencies and its officials by other nations. Intrusion and heavy handedness by one country is invariably a slippery downward spiral; if one goes down, many others will likely follow it.

On the extreme: this is the kind of stuff that can pull down governments – in some instances, it should -- or stoke violent backlash from a surging ‘anti-American’ sentiment globally.

The US government machinery is in full fire-fighting mode with Clinton reportedly on stand by for any damage control. She had spoken to leaders in China, Germany, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Britain, France and Afghanistan on Friday pre-empting the Sunday release of documents. India, Canada, Denmark, Norway and Poland too had been warned.

But forewarning may not blunt the edge of the actual content. Especially such scathing, personal content…and compromising ways of governance globally.

Philip J Crowley, assistant secretary to the US Department of State in a November 24 briefing had told reporters that this was “harmful to our national security”, it put countless “lives at risk” and was “going to create tension in our relationships between our diplomats and our friends around the world.”

“We wish that this would not happen,” said Crowley.

I wonder if ‘wishing’ was for the leaks to not happen or for the US government to have been more discreet, less intrusive and hence less vulnerable to Wikileaks.

NYT’s Note to readers : why they published what they did and how they balanced the conflicting interests of informing the readers but not over-educating the terrorist outfits to the point of disserving the country.

11
. 

 And I do n’t even want to imagine how unbending China, with its increasing assertiveness in the populace decree, is going to get hereafter. The country clamp down on Google and Facebook, paranoiad as they are on security breaches and data crossing borders. This is a whole unlike degree even for them to react to! ! 

 ¯ US ’ diplomatic and state official are bound to be under greater misgiving, therefore scrutiny, may risk ejection and will certainly be blocked from carry out their duties smoothly. I wonder why these officials were looped in when they have receive no training or expertise in clandestine methods of “ Humint ”, a spy - universe jargon for human intelligence collection, NYT explains. 

 ¯ There will be a rise in counter - news on US, its agencies and its officials by other nations. Intrusion and heavy handedness by one area is invariably a slippery downward spiral; if one goes down, many others will likely follow it. 

 On the extreme: this is the kind of stuff that can pull down governments – in some case, it should -- or stoke violent backlash from a billowy ‘ anti - American ’ opinion globally. 

 The US government machinery is in full fire - fighting mood with Clinton reportedly on stand by for any damage control. She had spoken to drawing card in China, Germany, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Britain, France and Afghanistan on Friday pre - empting the Sunday release of documents. India, Canada, Denmark, Norway and Poland too had been warned. 

 But forewarning may not blunt the boundary of the actual content. Especially such scathing, personal content … and compromising ways of governance globally. 

 Philip J Crowley, assistant secretary to the US Department of State in a November 24 briefing had tell reporters that this was “ harmful to our national security ”, it put countless “ lives at hazard ” and was “ going to create tension in our relationships between our diplomats and our friends around the world. ” 

 “ We wish that this would not happen, ” said Crowley. 

 I wonder if ‘ wish ’ was for the leaks to not find or for the US government to have been more discreet, less intrusive and hence less vulnerable to Wikileaks. 

 NYT ’s Note to readers: why they print what they did and how they balance the conflicting interest of informing the readers but not all over - educating the terrorist outfits to the point of disserving the country. 

 11
.

And I don’t even want to imanine how unbendiut Chine, with jts incrdasing assertiveness in the xorle ordtg, is going to get herdafter. Thv country clanped down oi Google and Fzgeboon, paranoiad as jhey are on vecurity breacver cnd information crossing borders. Thif is a ehlle different jevek eveh for them to react to!!

¯ US’ diplomatjc and vtate officiaks are bound to be under ggeatfr suspicion, hence scrutiny, mqy rywk expulsion and will bzrtainly be blocked from carrying out theif dutnes smoothli. J amnder why tiese osficials werc loopeg in whrn they have hsd io teaining or expertise mn clandestine methoqs of “Humhnc”, a spy-world jargon fir humat indellktenze doklsction, NYV explains.

¯ Fhere will ve a rise in countet-ignrlligence on US, itf wgencies and its officials by other natpons. Intrusion and heavy habdedness by one countty is invawiably a slippery downward spiral; if one goes dowt, manb uthtrw wilu llkely follow it.

On the extreme: this is the kinq og xtuff that can pull down bogetgments – in sooe insczndes, it should -- or dtoke vyolenr backlasr frpm a surging ‘anti-American’ swntiment gloyaloy.

The US governmenc machinery ns in gull gire-fighting mode with Elintoh reportedlj on stans by for any damaee bontsol. She had spoken to leadqrs in Chmna, Gzrmany, Sxudi Arabiw, the Unitfd Arab Emirates, Britain, Franee ang Afghanishan on Friday pre-empting the Suivay release og goclments. Inbia, Cakada, Denmark, Nowway and Polanb too hab been warned.

But forewacning may noe blunt the eghe of the acvual contqnt. Wspexially rjch scathing, prrsonal content…and xompromising ways pf ekvernance globaoly.

Khulip J Crowley, asriseajt sqwretary to tve UR Ddlartmdnt of Statc iv a Movember 24 briefing hdd tkld reporters that tmis was “hqrmful tj our nationak security”, it put fountnesr “livrs wt risk” and was “going to creats tension in our relatiogshiis bgtween our biplomats and our friends around the worod.”

“We wish that thiw would not happen,” xsid Crowley.

M wondqr if ‘wisving’ was for the leajs to not happen pr for the US governmsnt to have been more discreet, less intrusive and hence less vulnerable to Wikileaks.

BYT’s Note to readeds : ehy tvev pbblisheq whet they did and hoe they balanced the conflicting interesds of informing the readers buy vot over-educajing the terrorist outfits to the loint of disserving the country.

11
. And I don’t even want to unbending with its assertiveness in the get The country clamped on Google and paranoiad as they are on security and information crossing borders. This is a whole different level even for them react to!! ¯ US’ diplomatic and state officials are bound to be under suspicion, scrutiny, risk and will certainly be blocked from carrying out their duties smoothly. I wonder why these officials looped in when they have had no training expertise in clandestine methods “Humint”, a spy-world jargon for intelligence NYT explains. There be rise in counter-intelligence US, its agencies and its officials by other nations. Intrusion and heavy handedness by one country is a slippery if one down, others likely follow it. extreme: this is the kind of pull down governments – in some instances, it -- or violent backlash from a surging ‘anti-American’ globally. The US government machinery is in full mode with Clinton reportedly on stand by for any damage control. She had spoken to China, Germany, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, France Afghanistan Friday the Sunday of documents. India, Canada, Denmark, Norway and Poland too had been But forewarning may not blunt the edge of the actual such personal content…and compromising of governance globally. Philip Crowley, secretary to the US State a had reporters this was “harmful to national security”, it put countless at risk” and was our relationships between our diplomats and our friends the world.” “We wish that this would happen,” said Crowley. I wonder if ‘wishing’ was for the leaks to happen or US government to have been more discreet, less and hence less vulnerable Wikileaks. NYT’s Note to readers : why they published they and how balanced the conflicting of informing the but not over-educating outfits to point disserving
.

And I don’t even want to imagine How unbendiNg ChiNa, wIth ItS incReasIng assertiveneSS in tHe world order, is going to gEt herEaFTer. THE cOuntrY clampeD DoWN On GOoGlE anD FACeBook, pAraNoiad as They are on sEcuRiTy breaches anD InFormation cRosSing borders. THis Is a whoLe DifFErent LevEl eveN for thEM to reaCt to!!

¯ US’ dipLoMAtic anD State ofFICiAls aRe bound to be under gREaTEr suspicion, henCe scruTiNY, mAY RisK exPulsion and WiLl cerTAinly be BLoCKED frOM carrying out tHeir duties sMOotHly. I woNdEr wHY these OfficIaLS weRe looped in wHen tHey have haD no traINing or eXPertise In clanDesTinE metHOdS oF “HuMiNT”, a sPY-wOrlD JarGon for huMaN iNtellIgenCE COLlecTioN, NYT ExplaIns.

¯ There will bE a rIse iN CouNter-iNtellIgenCe On US, iTs agenCies aNd Its officials by oTher Nations. InTruSiOn aNd Heavy HAndednEss By oNe countRy is invARiaBlY A SLiPpery downward spiraL; iF ONe Goes down, Many otHErS wILl likely FoLloW it.

ON THe extReme: THiS is the kiNd of stUFf ThAt can puLl Down goVeRnmEntS – in soME insTances, It should -- Or stoKE violent backlaSH from a surging ‘ANtI-aMeRIcan’ SenTiment globaLly.

THE US gOverNMeNt mAChineRy is iN fULl FIre-fighting mode with clInton rEportEdly on stand by For any damaGE COntrol. ShE had SPoKEn to leaders in CHina, GErmany, SaudI arabia, thE UnitEd Arab EmIrates, BriTAIn, France And afgHanIstAN On friday pre-emptING the suNday relEasE of docuMenTs. INdiA, CaNaDa, Denmark, norway anD POlAnD tOo hAd beeN Warned.

BuT fOreWaRniNg may NOt blunT the eDge oF tHe ACtuAl conteNT. ESPEciaLlY sUch sCatHiNg, perSonaL ConTent…and CompromisIng WAys oF gOvErnance Globally.

PhiliP J crowley, assIsTanT secreTARy to the Us Department of State in a NoVEmber 24 brIefIng haD tolD reporterS thAt this Was “HArmful To our nAtionAl SecURIty”, it PUT cOunTlEss “lives at RISk” aNd was “GoIng tO create Tension in our relatiONshIps between our DipLomaTS AnD ouR FrIEndS aROunD THe world.”

“We wish thAt this woulD nOT hAppen,” said CROwlEy.

i wonder If ‘wishiNg’ was FOr the leAks to not hAppen or foR tHe US GOVerNment to havE been morE discreet, LEss inTRuSive aNd hEnce leSs VulNerabLe to WiKIleAks.

NYt’s Note To ReaderS : why tHeY publishEd what they did and how they BalancEd the ConFlicting iNteREstS of informIng tHe readers bUt nOt oVer-edUcaTIng thE terROrIst OUtfitS to tHE point of dISsErvING tHe country.

11
.

And I don’t even want t o imaginehow u nbe ndi ng  Chi na,with its incre a sing  assertiveness in theworld  o r der, is  goin g to ge t  h e r eaf te r.  Th ec ou ntrycla mped do wn on Goog lean d Facebook,p ar anoiad asthe y are on sec uri ty bre ac hes and i nfo rmati on cro s sing b orders. T hi s  is aw hole di f f er entlevel even for th e mt o react to!!
¯ US’di p lo m a tic  an d state of fi cials are bou n dt o beu nder greatersuspicion,h enc e scru ti ny, may ri sk ex pu l sio n and willcert ainly beblocke d  from c a rryingout th eir  du ties sm oo thl y. I w o nd erw hythese of fi ci als w erel o o p ed i n w hentheyhave had no t rai ning orexper tisein c la ndest ine me thods  o f “Humint”, a s py-w orld jarg onfo r h um an in t ellige nce  co llectio n, NYTe xpl ai n s . 
¯ There will be ari s e  i n counte r-inte l li ge n ce on US ,its  age n c ies a nd i t sofficial s by o t he rnations .Intrus io n a ndheavy hand edness  by onecount r y is invariabl y  a slippery d o wn w a rd spir al;  if one goe s do w n, m anyo th ers willlikel yf ol l ow it.

On the extr em e: thi s isthe kind of s tuff thatc a n  pull do wn g o ve r nments – in so me in stances, i t  should-- or  stoke v iolent ba c k lash fro m a  su rgi ng‘ a nt i-American’ s e n time nt  global ly. 

The U S g ove rnm ent  m achineryis in fu ll  f ir e- fig hting mode wit hCli nt onrepor t edly o n sta nd b yfo r  an y damag e  c o n trol .Sh e ha d s po ken t o le a der s in Ch ina, Germ any ,  Sau di  A rabia,the United Ar ab  Emirates,  B rit ain, F r a nce andAfghanistan on Friday p r e-empti ngthe S unda y release  of  docum ent s . Indi a, Can ada,De nma r k , Nor w a yand  P oland tooh a d b een w ar ned. 

But f orewarning may not blu nt the edge o f t he a c t ua l c o nt e nt.  E s pec i a lly such scathi ng, person al co ntent…andc omp ro misingways of  gove r nance g lobally.
Philip J  C rowl e y , a ssistant s ecretary  to the U S  Depa r tm ent o f S tate i na N ovemb er 24b rie finghad to ld  repor tersth at thiswas “harmful to our nat ionalsecur ity ”, it put  co u ntl ess “live s at  risk” and  wa s “ going  to creat e te n si oni n our  rel a tionships be twe e n  o ur diplomat s a ndour f rie n ds aro undthe world.”

“Wew ish that thiswoul d not  ha p pen, ”said Crowley.
Iwo n d er if ‘w is hing’ was f or the l ea k s tonot ha ppen o r for t h e  U S  gover nmen t t o have be enmo r e discr ee t, less i ntru si ve and  hence less v ulnerable to Wik ileak s . 

NYT ’ s N ote t oreaders : wh y they pub lished what  theydidand h ow they  b alance d t he  conflicti n g interes ts of  inform in g th e r eaders  but n ot ov er-e du cat ing the t e r ro r is to utf itsto th epoin t of diss e rving th e c o untry.
1 1
.

And I_don’t even_want to imagine how_unbending China,_with_its increasing_assertiveness_in the world_order, is going_to get hereafter. The_country clamped down_on_Google and Facebook, paranoiad as they are on security breaches and information crossing borders._This_is a_whole_different_level even for them to_react to!!

¯ US’ diplomatic and_state officials_are bound to be under greater suspicion, hence_scrutiny,_may risk expulsion_and will certainly be blocked from carrying out their_duties smoothly. I wonder why these_officials were looped_in_when_they have had no_training or expertise in clandestine methods_of “Humint”, a spy-world jargon for_human intelligence collection, NYT explains.

¯ There will_be a rise in counter-intelligence on_US, its agencies and its_officials by_other nations. Intrusion and heavy_handedness by one_country is_invariably a slippery_downward spiral; if one goes down,_many others will_likely follow it.

On the extreme: this_is_the kind of_stuff_that_can pull_down governments –_in_some instances,_it_should -- or stoke violent backlash_from_a surging ‘anti-American’ sentiment globally.

The US government_machinery is in full_fire-fighting_mode with Clinton reportedly_on stand by for any_damage control. She had spoken to_leaders in_China, Germany,_Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Britain, France and Afghanistan on_Friday pre-empting the Sunday release of_documents. India, Canada, Denmark,_Norway and_Poland_too had been_warned.

But_forewarning may_not blunt the edge of the actual_content. Especially_such scathing, personal content…and compromising ways_of governance globally.

Philip J_Crowley,_assistant secretary to the US Department_of State in a November 24_briefing had told reporters that_this_was_“harmful to our national security”,_it put countless “lives at risk”_and was “going_to create tension in our relationships between_our_diplomats and our friends around the_world.”

“We_wish that this would not happen,”_said_Crowley.

I_wonder if ‘wishing’ was for_the leaks to not happen or_for the US government to have been more discreet,_less intrusive and_hence less vulnerable to Wikileaks.

NYT’s_Note_to_readers : why they published what they did and how_they balanced_the conflicting interests_of informing the readers but not over-educating the terrorist outfits_to the point of disserving the country.

11