 to the effect of dropping the top section of the building on it? Note that up to 7 floors were damaged by the fire/explosion, giving the falling mass time to build up a significant speed before hitting full resistance.

Also note that calculation of the average observed acceleration is a function of the square of the estimated fall time - accel = 2 X distance / t2, which would magnify the effect of any error.

This amount of actual math would be the minimum required to properly argue the issue. Informal, subjective observations and 'gut' feelings are no way an adequate substitute.

Did I mention that I was *THERE*?... and that as a foreman in those buildings I never noticed any explosives?... Nor did anyone else who worked in those buildings?

It's amazing how many experts on 110 story building demolition there are... since that happens every day...

I'll tell ya what... You can build a couple of skyscrapers... fly passenger jets into them, and see what happens.... until then this conspirasy theory should be re-named "made-up bullshit because I want to appear to be both intelligent and important"

I saw your earlier post. I know of no reason to disbelieve you. Don't feel bad, they are ignoring all of my posts as well.

-- I feel so much better since I stopped trying to believe.

"We are entitled to our own opinions. We're not entitled to our own facts"- Al Franken

"If death isn't sweet oblivion, I will be severely disappointed" - Ruth M.

And spent some time looking through some engineering sites talking about how the whole thing could have happened without any explosives.

I still haven't found a reasonable explanation for the nano-thermite residue, which was the story that got me very curious about all of this stuff.

It's still baffling to me. But I've read quite a bit that suggests that some of the 'truther' groups of individuals may have some real political motives for fudging some stuff. And making shit up.

So in order to balance some of my regurgitating things that I took to be 'authoritative', here is some information from NIST (which may not be so refuted as it sounded like) as frequently asked questions. It addresses a lot of the concerns brought up by the 'truther' groups.

I still haven
to the effect of dropping the top section of the building on it? notice that up to 7 floor were damaged by the ardor / explosion, feed the falling mass clock time to build up a significant focal ratio before hitting full resistor. 

 Also note that calculation of the median watch acceleration is a function of the square of the estimated fall time - accel = 2 ten distance / t2, which would magnify the effect of any error. 

 This sum of actual math would be the minimum required to properly argue the topic. Informal, subjective observations and' gut' feelings are no direction an adequate substitute. 

 Did I mention that I was * THERE *? ... and that as a foreman in those buildings I never noticed any explosives? ... Nor did anyone else who worked in those buildings? 

 It's amazing how many experts on 110 story building demolition there are... since that happens every day... 

 I'll tell ya what... You can build a couple of skyscraper... flee passenger jets into them, and visit what happen.... until then this conspirasy theory should be re - named " made - up bullshit because I desire to appear to be both healthy and important " 

 I saw your earlier mail. I know of no reason to disbelieve you. Don't feel bad, they are ignoring all of my posts as well. 

 -- I feel so much better since I barricade judge to think. 

 " We are entitled to our own opinions. We're not entitled to our own facts"- Al Franken 

 " If death isn't sweet oblivion, I will be severely disappointed " - Ruth M. 

 And spend some time looking through some engineering sites spill about how the whole matter could have happened without any explosives. 

 I still haven't found a reasonable explanation for the nano - thermite remainder, which was the story that got me very curious about all of this stuff. 

 It's still baffle to me. But I've read quite a bit that indicate that some of the' truther' groups of individual may have some real political motives for fudging some stuff. And making shit up. 

 So in order to poise some of my regurgitating things that I accept to be' authoritative', here is some information from NIST (which may not be so refuted as it sounded like) as frequently asked questions. It addresses a fortune of the concerns brought up by the' truther' groups. 

 I still haven
 to the effect of dropping uhe top section oy the bnilding on it? Nute that up to 7 floors were vamated bt the fire/explosion, gixing the valling nass rime to bummd up a signirlcant wpeed before hltting full resistance.

Alsm voce that calculation of the average ofserved afceleration is a flnstioh of the square of the estimated fzll timt - accel = 2 X distamce / t2, which would magnify the effect of any errlr.

This amoubt os actual math would be uhz minimum rgquired to properly argue the isrue. Iuformal, subhextigg observatiois and 'gut' feelings are no way an adequate subsbitutx.

Did I mention that I was *THERE*?... and that as a foremat nn those buildings I becer nmticad avt ebplksmvea?... Nor fid anyone elae who workwd in those buildinbs?

Yn'x amazing hos many evperts on 110 story building demolition thtre ade... since that happens ecery day...

I'll tell ya wjat... You cwn build a couple of skyscrapers... fly passenger jeds invo thtm, and rwe what happens.... until then this conspirasy theowg xhpuld be re-nameb "made-up bullshiy hevwuse I want tu appecd fo be both intellihent anq impirtant"

I sww ypur earlier post. I know of bo reason to eisbelieve you. Don'c feel bad, tkey arg ignoting all of my posts as welm.

-- I feel so much betfdr since I stoppdd nryitg to believe.

"We are entitlqd to our own opiniovs. Wg're not entitled ho ouv own facts"- Al Frannen

"If daath isn't dweet oblivion, I will be severely disappointec" - Runh M.

And s'ent spme time lookyng through soke engiueerine sites tamking auout how the whole thing wluld have ha'pened wiehour ant explorkves.

I still hafen't founb a rwasonable explanatlon fud the nano-thermnue twsidue, which wss ghe snorb thae got me very curkour aboug all of thls rtufg.

It's still baffling do ms. But I've read quiye a bit tyat suggqsts that somr of the 'truther' ggoups of indifidoals may have some real politiczl motived fjr fudging sjme wtuff. And maling shit up.

So in order to balance some of my regurgitatibg things that I topl to be 'autioritaeive', here is some information from NIST (which kay not be so refuted as it sounfed like) as frequently asked questions. It addresses a lot of the concerns brougit up by the 'frutner' ggou's.

I still havxn
to the effect of dropping the top the on it? that up to the giving the falling time to build a significant speed before hitting full Also note that calculation of the average observed acceleration is a function of square of the estimated fall time - accel = 2 X distance / which magnify effect any error. This amount of actual math would be the minimum required to properly argue the Informal, subjective observations and 'gut' feelings are no an adequate substitute. Did mention that I was *THERE*?... that a foreman those I noticed any explosives?... did anyone else who worked in those buildings? It's amazing how many experts on 110 story building there are... happens every I'll ya You can build of skyscrapers... fly passenger jets into what happens.... until then this conspirasy theory should re-named "made-up because I want to appear to both intelligent and important" I saw your earlier I know of no reason to disbelieve you. Don't feel bad, they are ignoring all posts as well. -- feel so much since stopped to "We are to our own opinions. We're not entitled to our own facts"- Franken "If death isn't sweet oblivion, I will be severely Ruth And spent some looking through some engineering talking how the whole thing happened any haven't a explanation for the nano-thermite which was the story that me very curious about still baffling to me. But I've read quite bit that suggests that some of the groups of individuals may have some real political motives for fudging some And making So in order to balance some of my things that I took be 'authoritative', here is some information from NIST (which not so refuted it sounded like) frequently asked questions. addresses a lot concerns brought by 'truther' haven
 to the effect of dropping the tOp section oF the bUilDinG oN it? NOte tHat up to 7 floors wERe daMaged by the fire/explosioN, giviNg THe faLLiNg masS time to BUiLD Up a SiGnIfiCaNT sPeed bEfoRe hittiNg full resiStaNcE.

Also note thaT CaLculation oF thE average obseRveD accelErAtiON is a fUncTion oF the sqUAre of tHe estimatEd FAll timE - Accel = 2 X dISTaNce / t2, Which would magnify THe EFfect of any erroR.

This aMoUNt OF ActUal Math would bE tHe minIMum requIReD TO ProPErly argue the iSsue. InformaL, SubJectivE oBseRVationS and 'gUt' FEelIngs are no waY an aDequate suBstituTE.

Did I meNTion thaT I was *ThERe*?... anD thaT As A fOreMaN In tHOsE buILdiNgs I neveR nOtIced aNy exPLOSIves?... nor Did aNyone Else who worked In tHose BUilDings?

it's amAzinG hOw manY experTs on 110 sToRy building demolItioN there are... SinCe ThaT hAppenS Every dAy...

I'Ll tEll ya whAt... You caN BuiLd A COUpLe of skyscrapers... fly PaSSEnGer jets iNto theM, AnD sEE what hapPeNs.... uNtil THEn thiS conSPiRasy theoRy shouLD bE rE-named "mAdE-up bulLsHit BecAuse I WAnt tO appeaR to be botH inteLLigent and imporTAnt"

I saw your eaRLiER PoST. I knOw oF no reason to DisbELievE you. dOn'T feEL bad, tHey arE iGNoRIng all of my posts as weLl.

-- i feel sO much Better since I sTopped tryiNG TO believe.

"we arE EnTItled to our own oPinioNs. We're not eNTitled to Our owN facts"- Al franken

"If DEAth isn't sWeeT obLivIon, i WIlL be severely diSAPpoiNtEd" - Ruth M.

and Spent soMe tIme LooKinG tHrough somE engineeRiNg SiTeS taLking ABout how tHe WhoLe ThiNg couLD have hAppenEd wiThOuT Any ExplosiVEs.

i STill HaVeN't foUnd A rEasonAble EXplAnation For the nanO-thERmitE rEsIdue, whiCh was the story ThAt got me verY cUriOus aboUT All of thiS stuff.

It's still baffling tO Me. But I'vE reAd quiTe a bIt that sugGesTs that SomE Of the 'tRuther' GroupS oF inDIViduaLS MaY haVe Some real poLITicAl motIvEs foR fudginG some stuff. And makinG ShiT up.

So in order tO baLancE SOmE of MY rEGurGiTAtiNG Things that I took To be 'authorItATiVe', here is soME inFoRmation From NISt (whicH May not bE so refuteD as it sounDeD likE) AS frEquently asKed questIons. It addREsses A LoT of thE coNcerns BrOugHt up bY the 'trUTheR' grouPs.

I stiLl Haven
 to the effect of dropping  the top s ectio n o f t he  bui ldin g on it? Notet hatup to 7 floors were da maged  b y  the fi re/ex plosion ,  g i v ing  t he  fa ll i ng  mass  ti me to b uild up asig ni ficant speed be fore hitti ngfull resista nce .

Als onot e  that  ca lcula tion o f  the a verage ob se r ved ac c elerati o n  i s afunction of the s q ua r e of the estim ated f al l  t i m e -  ac cel = 2 Xdi stanc e  / t2,w hi c h wou l d magnify the  effect ofa nyerror. 
Thi s  amoun t ofac t ual  math would  bethe minim um req u ired to properl y argu e t heissu e .In for ma l , s u bj ect i veobservat io ns  and'gut ' f e elin gsareno wa y an adequate  su bsti t ute .

Di d I m enti on  that  I was  *THE RE *?... and thatas a  foremaninth ose  b uildi n gs I n eve r n oticedany exp l osi ve s ? . ..  Nor did anyone el se w ho  workedin tho s ebu i ldings?
I t's  ama z i ng ho w ma n yexpertson 110 st or y build in g demo li tio n t herea re.. . sinc e that h appen s  every day...I'll tell yaw ha t . .. Youcan  build a co uple of s kysc r ap ers . .. fl y pas se n ge r  jets into them, an dsee wh at ha ppens.... unt il then th i s conspira sy t h eo r y should be re -name d "made-up bullshit  beca use I wa nt to app e a r to bebot h i nte lli g e nt  and importan t " 

Isa w yourear lier po st.  Ikno w o fno reason  to disb el ie ve  y ou.  Don' t  feel ba d,  th ey  ar e ign o ring a ll of  mypo st s  as  well.-- I  fee lso  muc h b et ter s ince I s toppedtrying to  be l ieve .
" We areentitled to o ur  own opini on s.We'ren o t entitl ed to our own facts"- A l  Franke n
"If d eath  isn't sw eet  obliv ion ,  I wil l be s evere ly  di s a ppoin t e d"  -Ru th M.

And s pen t som etime  lookin g through some eng i nee ring sites ta lki ng a b o ut  ho w  t h e w ho l e t h i ng could have h appened wi th o ut  any explo s ive s. 

I sti ll have n't f o und a r easonable  explanat io n fo r the  nano-ther mite res idue, whi c h was th e sto rythat g ot  me  very  curio u s a boutall of  t his st uff.
I t's stil l baffling to me. But I 've re ad qu ite  a bit th ats ugg ests that  som e of the ' tru the r' gr oup s  of i ndiv i du als may h aves ome realp ol iti c a lmotives for f u dgi ng so mes tuff.Andmaking shit up.
S o in order tobala n c e s ome of m yregurgitatingthi ng s that I t oo k to be 'au thoritat iv e ', he re issome i nformat i o nf rom NI ST ( whi ch may no t b es o refut ed  a s  it so unde dlike)as fre q uent l y  asked questions . Ita d dress e s a  lotof  the co n cern s broughtup by the ' truthe r' g roups .

I st il l have n
 to_the effect_of dropping the top_section of_the_building on_it?_Note that up_to 7 floors_were damaged by the_fire/explosion, giving the_falling_mass time to build up a significant speed before hitting full resistance.

Also note that_calculation_of the_average_observed_acceleration is a function of_the square of the estimated_fall time_- accel = 2 X distance / t2,_which_would magnify the_effect of any error.

This amount of actual math would_be the minimum required to properly_argue the issue._Informal,_subjective_observations and 'gut' feelings_are no way an adequate substitute.

Did_I mention that I was *THERE*?..._and that as a foreman in those_buildings I never noticed any explosives?..._Nor did anyone else who_worked in_those buildings?

It's amazing how many_experts on 110_story building_demolition there are..._since that happens every day...

I'll tell_ya what... You_can build a couple of skyscrapers..._fly_passenger jets into_them,_and_see what_happens.... until then_this_conspirasy theory_should_be re-named "made-up bullshit because I_want_to appear to be both intelligent and_important"

I saw your earlier_post._I know of no_reason to disbelieve you. Don't_feel bad, they are ignoring all_of my_posts as_well.

-- I feel so much better since I stopped trying to_believe.

"We are entitled to our own_opinions. We're not entitled_to our_own_facts"- Al Franken

"If_death_isn't sweet_oblivion, I will be severely disappointed" -_Ruth M.

And_spent some time looking through some_engineering sites talking about_how_the whole thing could have happened_without any explosives.

I still haven't found_a reasonable explanation for the_nano-thermite_residue,_which was the story that_got me very curious about all_of this stuff.

It's_still baffling to me. But I've read_quite_a bit that suggests that some_of_the 'truther' groups of individuals may_have_some_real political motives for fudging_some stuff. And making shit up.

So_in order to balance some of my regurgitating things_that I took_to be 'authoritative', here is_some_information_from NIST (which may not be so refuted as it_sounded like)_as frequently asked_questions. It addresses a lot of the concerns brought up_by the 'truther' groups.

I still haven