 fish and reptiles have always been reptiles. So, never plead ignorance of the fact that fish can never evolve into snakes or lizards, and that such a scenario can only be narrated in stories.

• Unable to explain how the perfect structure of bird feathers occurred, evolutionists claim that birds evolved from reptiles. This is surely a groundless claim. The fossil record reveals that birds have always been birds and reptiles have always been reptiles.

Due to several physiological and anatomical differences, such a transition is implausible. To cite a few examples;

\- Birds have a totally different lung structure from reptiles.

\- Their skeletal structure is totally different from reptiles; for instance the bones of birds are lighter than the bones of reptiles.

\- Birds have feathers, whereas reptiles are covered with scales that have totally different structures.

In brief, the scenarios that the forelegs of a reptile transformed into wings and that then they started flying has no scientific basis whatsoever. Never plead ignorance of the fact that a reptile can never transform into a bird.

• Another fact invalidates the theory of evolution. Evolutionists fail to bring an explanation of how life originated on earth.

All living beings are made up of cells. For instance, there are 100 trillion cells in a human organism. Proteins are the basic building blocks of the cell. The formation, under natural conditions, of but one single protein, out of the thousands of complex protein molecules making up the cell, is not possible.

Proteins are giant molecules consisting of smaller units called "amino-acids", the simplest of which is composed of 50 amino acids, but there are some that are composed of thousands of amino acids. The crucial point is that the absence, addition, or replacement of a single amino in the structure of a protein would transform it into a useless molecular heap. Every amino acid has to be at the right place and in the right order.

The fact that the functional structure of proteins absolutely cannot come about by chance can easily be understood even from simple probability calculations that anybody can understand.

An average sized protein molecule is composed of 288 amino acids of which there are twelve different types. These can be arranged in 10*300 different ways. In other words, the probability of the formation of only one protein molecule is "1 out of 10300 ". The probability of this "1" to occur is therefore practically impossible.

So, never plead ignorance
fish and reptiles have always been reptiles. therefore, never plead ignorance of the fact that pisces can never evolve into snakes or lizards, and that such a scenario can entirely be narrated in stories. 

 • ineffective to explain how the perfect structure of dame feathers occurred, evolutionist claim that birds evolved from reptiles. This is surely a groundless title. The fossil record reveals that birds have always been bird and reptiles have always been reptiles. 

 Due to respective physiological and anatomical remainder, such a transition is farfetched. To cite a few example; 

 \- Birds have a totally unlike lung structure from reptiles. 

 \- Their skeletal structure is totally different from reptile; for case the bones of birds are lighter than the bones of reptiles. 

 \- Birds have feathers, whereas reptiles are brood with scales that have wholly unlike structures. 

 In brief, the scenarios that the forelegs of a reptile transformed into wing and that then they started flying has no scientific basis whatsoever. Never plead ignorance of the fact that a reptile can never translate into a bird. 

 • Another fact invalidates the theory of evolution. Evolutionists fail to bring an explanation of how life originated on earth. 

 All living beings are made up of cell. For instance, there cost 100 trillion cells in a human organism. Proteins are the basic building blocks of the cell. The constitution, under natural conditions, of but one single protein, out of the thousand of complex protein molecules make up the cell, is not possible. 

 protein are giant molecules consisting of smaller units call " amino - acids ", the simple of which is composed of 50 amino acid, but there are some that are write of thousands of amino acids. The all-important point is that the absence, addition, or replacement of a single amino in the structure of a protein would transform it into a useless molecular heap. Every amino acid has to be at the right place and in the right order. 

 The fact that the running structure of proteins absolutely cannot total about by chance can easily be understood even from simple probability calculations that anybody can understand. 

 An median sized protein molecule is composed of 288 amino acids of which there are twelve different types. These can be arrange in 10 * 300 unlike ways. In other words, the probability of the formation of only one protein molecule is " 1 out of 10300 ". The probability of this " 1 " to occur is therefore much impossible. 

 So, never plead ignorance
 fidh and reptiles have alwxys been reptilgs. So, neter plezd ignorxnce of the fact that fish cen nwver tnolve into snakes or uizards, ajd that wuch q scenario can onln be hwrracev in stories.

• Unsble to ex[lain how the [effzct structure of bird feathers occurwed, evokuhionists claim thau byrds vvilved from reptiles. This is shrely a groundless ckaim. The fossil record revfals that birds have apways been virdf and reptiler have always been repjiles.

Due to several physiologicau and anatomicao eifvgrences, such a trwnsition is lkplaushble. To cite a few exsmpnes;

\- Birds have a totally different lung sttucture frmm reptiles.

\- Their sjeoetal strgctufw ir tktellg difffreit from repfiles; for ibstance the bones og fptds are lighfer thwn the bones of reptiles.

\- Birds have feathtrs, wgereas reptiles are covwred with scales that have totwlly different structures.

In brief, the scenarios tvat tie foxcjdts of a reptile transformed into wings and that fhtn nhey started flyikg has no scientifoc bsfis whatsoevet. Never plsad ignorance of tje fact that a reptilt can never transform into a bire.

• Another fabt ibvalidates the thelry of evolbtion. Gvolutoonists fail to bring au explznation of jow life kfiginated on eargh.

Akl living beings are made up of cells. For instanze, tnere awe 100 trilliln cells in a human orgajism. Kroteits are the basic building blocks of the cxkl. The formajiot, utder natbral cpnditions, of fut one single proteiu, out uf the tholsands of complex prjtein moleculad making up vhe cell, ys nit pissible.

Ofoteins are gisnt molecllts consistung of smaller unibs caumed "amino-acids", cke simplest of whoch is clm'osed mf 50 amino achds, cut yhere are some tmat are composed of thousangs or amino acids. The vrmcial poibt is thwt the absencr, addition, or replwcemeit of e singke wmino in the structure of a prktein woupd bransform it ynto a useless mplecular heap. Every amino acid has to bx at the right place ane in the right ordet.

Tht fact that tie funstional sdructure of proteins absolutely cannou come about by chance dan eavily he understood even from simple probability calculations that anybody can yndersvagd.

An averags siaed pgotzin molectle ms composed of 288 ampno acids of which there are tweuve diffarznt types. These can be arrangrd in 10*300 differenj ways. In other words, the lrobabiloty of the formation of only onr protein molecule is "1 omt of 10300 ". Tye prkbabilpjy uf this "1" to occur os thexefore practixalln impossible.

So, nefev plead igjoraice
fish and reptiles have always been reptiles. plead of the that fish can lizards, that such a can only be in stories. • Unable to explain the perfect structure of bird feathers occurred, evolutionists claim that birds evolved from This is surely a groundless claim. The fossil record reveals that birds have been and have been reptiles. Due to several physiological and anatomical differences, such a transition is implausible. To cite few examples; \- Birds have a totally different structure from reptiles. \- skeletal structure is totally different reptiles; instance the of are than the bones reptiles. \- Birds have feathers, whereas reptiles are covered with scales that have totally different structures. In the scenarios forelegs of reptile into and that then flying has no scientific basis whatsoever. of the fact that a reptile can never into a • Another fact invalidates the theory evolution. Evolutionists fail to bring an explanation of life originated on earth. All living beings are made up of cells. For instance, there trillion cells in a organism. Proteins are basic blocks the The formation, natural conditions, of but one single protein, out of the thousands complex protein molecules making up the cell, is not possible. giant consisting of smaller called "amino-acids", the simplest which composed of 50 amino there some of of acids. The crucial point that the absence, addition, or of a single amino protein would transform it into a useless molecular Every amino acid has to be at right place and in the right order. The fact that the functional of proteins come about by chance can easily be understood from simple probability calculations anybody can understand. An average sized protein molecule is of amino acids which there are different types. These be arranged in ways. In words, probability of only one protein molecule is out 10300 ". The probability of "1" is therefore practically impossible. So, never plead ignorance
 fish and reptiles have always Been reptilEs. So, nEveR plEaD ignOranCe of the fact thaT Fish Can never evolve into snakEs or lIzARds, aND tHat suCh a scenARiO CAn oNlY bE naRrATeD in stOriEs.

• UnablE to explain How ThE perfect struCTuRe of bird feAthErs occurred, eVolUtioniStS clAIm thaT biRds evOlved fROm reptIles. This iS sURely a gROundlesS CLaIm. ThE fossil record reveALs THat birds have alWays beEn BIrDS And RepTiles have aLwAys beEN reptilES.

DUE TO seVEral physiologIcal and anatOMicAl diffErEncES, such a TransItIOn iS implausiblE. To cIte a few exAmples;

\- bIrds havE A totallY diffeRenT luNg stRUcTuRe fRoM RepTIlEs.

\- THEir Skeletal StRuCture Is toTALLY difFerEnt fRom rePtiles; for instAncE the BOneS of biRds arE ligHtEr thaN the boNes of RePtiles.

\- Birds have FeatHers, whereAs rEpTilEs Are coVEred wiTh sCalEs that hAve totaLLy dIfFEREnT structures.

In brief, ThE SCeNarios thAt the fOReLeGS of a reptIlE trAnsfORMed inTo wiNGs And that tHen theY StArTed flyiNg Has no sCiEntIfiC basiS WhatSoever. never pleAd ignORance of the fact THat a reptile caN NeVER tRAnsfOrm Into a bird.

• AnOtheR Fact InvaLIdAteS The thEory oF eVOlUTion. Evolutionists faIl To brinG an exPlanation of hoW life origiNATEd on eartH.

All LIvINg beings are madE up of Cells. For inSTance, theRe are 100 Trillion Cells in a hUMAn organiSm. PRotEinS arE THe Basic building BLOcks Of The cell. the FormatiOn, uNdeR naTurAl ConditionS, of but onE sInGlE pRotEin, ouT Of the thoUsAndS oF coMplex PRotein MolecUles MaKiNG up The cell, IS nOT PossIbLe.

protEinS aRe giaNt moLEcuLes consIsting of sMalLEr unItS cAlled "amIno-acids", the siMpLest of whicH iS coMposed OF 50 Amino aciDs, but there are some that arE ComposeD of ThousAnds Of amino acIds. the cruCiaL Point iS that tHe absEnCe, aDDItion, OR RePlaCeMent of a sinGLE amIno in ThE strUcture oF a protein would tranSForM it into a useleSs mOlecULAr HeaP. evERy aMiNO acID Has to be at the rigHt place and In THe Right order.

tHe fAcT that thE functiOnal sTRucture Of proteinS absoluteLy CannOT ComE about by chAnce can eAsily be unDErstoOD eVen frOm sImple pRoBabIlity CalculATioNs thaT anyboDy Can undErstaNd.

an averagE sized protein molecule is ComposEd of 288 aMinO acids of wHicH TheRe are twelVe diFferent typEs. THesE can bE arRAnged In 10*300 diFFeRenT Ways. IN othER words, the PRoBabILItY of the formaTION of Only oNe pROtein mOlecUle is "1 out of 10300 ". The probABility of this "1" to OccuR IS thEreFOre pRaCtically impossIblE.

SO, NEver pleaD iGnorance
 fish and reptiles have al ways beenrepti les . S o,  nev er p lead ignorance of t he fact that fish cannever  e v olve in to sn akes or li z a rds ,an d t ha t  s uch a  sc enariocan only b e n ar rated in sto r ie s.

• Unab leto explain h owthe pe rf ect struc tur e ofbird f e athers  occurred ,e voluti o nists c l a im  tha t birds evolved f r om reptiles. This  is su re l ya gro und less claim .The f o ssil re c or d r eve a ls that birds  have alway s  be en bir ds  an d  repti les h av e  al ways been r epti les.

Due  to se v eral ph y siologi cal an d a nat omic a ldi ffe re n ces ,  s uch a t ransitio nis  impl ausi b l e .  Tocit e afew e xamples;

\-Bir ds h a vea tot allydiff er ent l ung st ructu re  from reptiles. 

\-  Their sk ele ta l s tr uctur e  is to tal lydiffere nt from rep ti l e s ;for instance the b on e s  o f birdsare li g ht er than the  b one s of r eptil es.\-  Birds h ave fe a th er s, wher ea s rept il esare  cove r ed w ith sc ales tha t hav e  totally diffe r ent structure s .I nb rief , t he scenario s th a t th e fo r el egs of arepti le tr a nsformed into wings  a nd tha t the n they starte d flying h a s no scien tifi c  b a sis whatsoever . Nev er plead i g noranceof th e fact t hat a rep t i le can n eve r t ran sfo r m  i nto a bird.
• Anot he r factinv alidate s t hethe ory  o f evoluti on. Evol ut io ni st s f ail t o  bring a nexp la nat ion o f  how l ife o rigi na te d  on  earth. 
A l l  liv in gbein gsar e mad e up ofcells.For insta nce ,  the re  a re 100trillion cell sin a human  o rga nism.P r oteins a re the basic building b l ocks of  th e cel l. T he format ion , unde r n a turalcondit ions,  o f b u t  ones i ng lepr otein, out o f t he th ou sand s of co mplex protein mole c ule s making up t hecell , is  no t  p o ssi bl e .
P r oteins are gian t molecule sc on sisting of sma ll er unit s calle d "am i no-acid s", the s implest o fwhic h iscomposed o f 50 ami no acids, but t h er e are  so me tha tare  comp osed o f  th ousan ds ofam ino ac ids.Th e crucia l point is that the abs ence,addit ion , or repl ace m ent  of a sin gleamino in t hestr uctur e o f  a pr otei n  w oul d  tran sfor m  it intoa  u sel e s smolecular h e a p . E veryami n o acid  has  to be at the rig h t place and in  the r igh t o r der. 
The fact thatthe  f u n ctionalst ructure ofproteins  a b solut ely ca nnot c ome abo u t  b y  chanc e ca n e asily beund er s tood ev en  f r om sim plepr obabil ity ca l cula t i ons that anybody  canu n derst a nd. 

Anav erage s i zedprotein mo lecule is c ompose d of  288amino a ci ds ofwhi ch  there are twelve di ffere nt type s.  The secan be  arr a n ged i n 10 *3 00different w ay s .In oth er w ords,  t he p robabilit y  of thefor m ation o fonl y one pr o te i n  moleculeis"1 ou t of 10300 " .  The pr o babil ity of  this"1" too ccu ris ther efo r e  practica lly impos s ibl e. 

So , neverpl eadig nor an ce
 fish_and reptiles_have always been reptiles._So, never_plead_ignorance of_the_fact that fish_can never evolve_into snakes or lizards,_and that such_a_scenario can only be narrated in stories.

• Unable to explain how the perfect structure_of_bird feathers_occurred,_evolutionists_claim that birds evolved from_reptiles. This is surely a_groundless claim._The fossil record reveals that birds have always_been_birds and reptiles_have always been reptiles.

Due to several physiological and anatomical_differences, such a transition is implausible._To cite a_few_examples;

\-_Birds have a totally_different lung structure from reptiles.

\- Their_skeletal structure is totally different from_reptiles; for instance the bones of birds_are lighter than the bones of_reptiles.

\- Birds have feathers, whereas_reptiles are_covered with scales that have_totally different structures.

In_brief, the_scenarios that the_forelegs of a reptile transformed into_wings and that_then they started flying has no_scientific_basis whatsoever. Never_plead_ignorance_of the_fact that a_reptile_can never_transform_into a bird.

• Another fact invalidates_the_theory of evolution. Evolutionists fail to bring_an explanation of how_life_originated on earth.

All living_beings are made up of_cells. For instance, there are 100_trillion cells_in a_human organism. Proteins are the basic building blocks of the cell._The formation, under natural conditions, of_but one single protein,_out of_the_thousands of complex_protein_molecules making_up the cell, is not possible.

Proteins are_giant molecules_consisting of smaller units called "amino-acids",_the simplest of which_is_composed of 50 amino acids, but_there are some that are composed_of thousands of amino acids._The_crucial_point is that the absence,_addition, or replacement of a single_amino in the_structure of a protein would transform it_into_a useless molecular heap. Every amino_acid_has to be at the right_place_and_in the right order.

The fact_that the functional structure of proteins_absolutely cannot come about by chance can easily be_understood even from_simple probability calculations that anybody_can_understand.

An_average sized protein molecule is composed of 288 amino acids_of which_there are twelve_different types. These can be arranged in 10*300 different ways._In other words, the probability of the_formation of only one protein molecule is "1 out of 10300_". The probability of this "1" to occur_is therefore practically impossible.

So, never plead ignorance