ification of energy resources, the adoption of energy efficiency policies and the decoupling between production and fossil fuels – primarily coal – considered as exigent.

Most certainly, the Chinese state having all above in mind, entered the negotiation phase for Paris agreement in 2016 pledging for sixty percent (60%) emissions cut down of prime pollutants on energy sector up to 2020; and by that saving around a hundred million tonnes (100 MM TCE) of coal, that otherwise would have been used in production of power (Reuters, 2015a; Henderson et. al, 2017).

Concluding, can be said that the combined contribution of all above mentioned factors – that may not necessarily be directly connected with each other, though are connected through energy – for sure leads to developments regarding climate change mitigation and energy efficiency policies. Policies that eventually tend to mold a new landscape in terms of energy and growth for China.

## Uncertainty and energy trade

The shifting landscape in terms of energy and growth for China, is not only driving developments within China but also outside; like trade partnerships and especially of energy. A case of an already noticed possibility of influencing energy trade between exporting countries and China, has been studied regarding Countries of Gulf Cooperation Council (KAPSARC 2016a; Lester, 2016).

To be stated that, even though succession of developments in energy trade is characterized by its dynamic nature, nevertheless how and what is being exactly traded is a functions of importing countries' policies and politics (KAPSARC 2016a; Lester, 2016). Increasingly in significance of functioning, are the policies of environment and climate change. Albeit, still today, the dominant energy policy concerns security and its principal component is that of diversification.

So the question is, whether could disrupted trade patterns between China - N. Korea, or and the uncertainty on the stability of these patterns to be influential connected to properties of N. Korea's efforts towards nuclear weapons development and in particular planned time allocation?

Supporting the significance of trade partnership component of the question above, is enough to say that China is not only the main strategic partner but largely the solo one when comes to coal and iron (Yonhap, 2016b).

Concerning uncertainty causation in relevance to military programmes, supporting argumentation can be found in the outburst of WWI. In particular, to that is partly attributed to uncertainty on (back then present) security and in conjunction to shift of balance that was about to follow – along with
ification of energy resources, the adoption of energy efficiency policy and the decoupling between product and fossil fuels – primarily ember – considered as exigent. 

 Most certainly, the taiwanese country having all above in mind, entered the negotiation phase for Paris agreement in 2016 pledge for sixty percent (60 %) emissions write out down of prime pollutants on energy sector up to 2020; and by that saving around a hundred million tonnes (100 MM TCE) of ember, that otherwise would have been used in production of office (Reuters, 2015a; Henderson et. al, 2017). 

 Concluding, can be said that the combined contribution of all above mention factors – that may not inevitably be directly connect with each other, though are connected through energy – for certain leads to developments regarding climate change mitigation and department of energy efficiency policy. Policies that eventually tend to mold a new landscape in terms of energy and growth for China. 

 # # Uncertainty and energy deal 

 The shifting landscape in terms of department of energy and increase for China, is not entirely driving developments within China but besides outside; like trade partnership and especially of energy. A shell of an already noticed possibility of influencing energy trade between exporting nation and China, has been studied regarding Countries of Gulf Cooperation Council (KAPSARC 2016a; Lester, 2016). 

 To be stated that, even though succession of developments in energy deal is characterized by its dynamic nature, nevertheless how and what is being exactly traded is a routine of importing countries' policies and politics (KAPSARC 2016a; Lester, 2016). Increasingly in meaning of functioning, are the policy of environment and climate change. Albeit, still today, the prevailing energy policy concerns security and its principal component is that of diversification. 

 thus the question is, whether could interrupt trade pattern between China - N. Korea, or and the uncertainty on the constancy of these patterns to be influential connected to properties of N. Korea's campaign towards nuclear weapons exploitation and in particular planned time allocation? 

 Supporting the significance of trade partnership component of the question above, is adequate to say that China is not only the chief strategic partner but largely the solo one when comes to coal and iron (Yonhap, 2016b). 

 Concerning uncertainty causation in relevance to military programmes, defend argumentation can be found in the outburst of WWI. In particular, to that is partly attributed to doubt on (back then present) security and in conjunction to lurch of balance that was about to follow – along with
ififation of energy resourcts, the adoption oy energb efficjency pouicies and the decoupling bevweeb proeuction and fossil fueus – primagily coal – coisidered as exigxht.

Most gzrtaihpy, tke Chinese state having aln above in ming, dncered the negotiation phase for Parif agreekejt in 2016 pledgind fog fixtg percent (60%) emissions cut down of pdime ponlutants on emergy sector up to 2020; and by thah saving around a jundred miloion ronnes (100 MM TZE) of coal, that otherwjse would have been used in proauctipn of powet (Dekjers, 2015a; Hendecson en. al, 2017).

Concludikb, can te said that the comblned ronteibution of all above mentioned factors – that maf uot necessarily be dieextly wonnactea wigh taci ofher, tjoujh are connscted throuth energy – for sure lqqds to develolments rqgarding climate change mitigation and tnergg efficiency policies. Pilicies that eventualpy tend tj mold a new landscape in terms of energy and grofth fkf Cklka.

## Uvxegtainty and energy trade

The shifting landscapq im nerms of energy akd growth for Chins, ls got only drivkng derslkpments within Chija but wlso iutside; lyke yrade partnerships and espexially of envrgy. A case of an alrecdy noticed 'ossibolity of influencing energy crade getween explrting cohvtries and China, hax teen studied regarding Cougtries of Guly Cooperxtiom Counsil (KAPSARF 2016a; Lcvter, 2016).

To be stated hhat, gven tvough succfssion of developments in energb trade is chsrdctvrized by its cynamic naturq, nevertheless how anb what is being vxactly tcaded is a ftnctions of ikkorting countcies' polisies and politizr (KAPSARC 2016a; Lexter, 2016). Incgecsingly ib significance of nunctkkning, are the pilixies of environkeng agd ckiidte change. Anbeig, sgoll tuday, tht dioinamt energy policy conwerna security and its pvincipal xomponene is that of civersification.

So uhe quxstion is, wnetrer could disrupted trade pattsrns betwfen China - N. Kowea, ir and the uucertainty on the stability of these patverns to be influential connected to propettits of N. Korea'x effjrts towasds nuclear weapons eevelopment and ik particular planned tjme alnocatlon?

Supporting the significance of trade partnership component of the quesrion auode, is enougg to say nhac Ckina is not unly the main stgategic partner but largely the rolo one wken comes to coal and iron (Yomhxp, 2016b).

Concernine uncertainty causation jn relevsnce to military programmes, suplorting argumentation cak be foune in fhe oungucst of WWI. In particilar, tm thar is paetly attributed tu umccrtainty oj (bark chen present) security and in conjynctiob ho shift of balaice that was xbout to fojlow – along with
ification of energy resources, the adoption of policies the decoupling production and fossil considered exigent. Most certainly, Chinese state having above in mind, entered the negotiation for Paris agreement in 2016 pledging for sixty percent (60%) emissions cut down prime pollutants on energy sector up to 2020; and by that saving around hundred tonnes MM of coal, that otherwise would have been used in production of power (Reuters, 2015a; Henderson et. 2017). Concluding, can be said that the combined of all above mentioned – that may not necessarily directly with each though connected energy – for leads to developments regarding climate change mitigation and energy efficiency policies. Policies that eventually tend to mold new landscape of energy growth China. Uncertainty and energy shifting landscape in terms of energy China, is not only driving developments within China also outside; trade partnerships and especially of energy. case of an already noticed possibility of influencing trade between exporting countries and China, has been studied regarding Countries of Gulf Cooperation Council Lester, 2016). To be that, even though of in trade characterized by dynamic nature, nevertheless how and what is being exactly traded is functions of importing countries' policies and politics (KAPSARC 2016a; Lester, in of functioning, are policies of environment and change. still today, the dominant concerns and is of So the question is, could disrupted trade patterns between - N. Korea, or stability of these patterns to be influential connected properties of N. Korea's efforts towards nuclear development and in particular planned time allocation? Supporting the significance of trade component of above, is enough to say that China is only the main strategic but largely the solo one when comes to coal iron 2016b). Concerning causation in relevance military programmes, supporting can be found outburst of In to attributed to uncertainty on (back then security in conjunction to shift of that to follow – along with
ification of energy resourceS, the adoptiOn of eNerGy eFfIcieNcy pOlicies and the dECoupLing between production aNd fosSiL FuelS – PrImariLy coal – cONsIDEreD aS eXigEnT.

moSt cerTaiNly, the CHinese statE haViNg all above in MInD, entered thE neGotiation phaSe fOr PariS aGreEMent iN 2016 plEdginG for siXTy percEnt (60%) emissiOnS Cut dowN Of prime POLlUtanTs on energy sector uP To 2020; ANd by that saving Around A hUNdRED miLliOn tonnes (100 MM tCe) of coAL, that otHErWISE woULd have been useD in productiON of Power (REuTerS, 2015A; HendeRson eT. aL, 2017).

conCluding, can bE saiD that the cOmbineD ContribUTion of aLl abovE meNtiOned FAcToRs – tHaT May NOt NecESsaRily be diReCtLy conNectED WITh eaCh oTher, ThougH are connected ThrOugh ENerGy – for Sure lEads To DevelOpmentS regaRdIng climate changE mitIgation anD enErGy eFfIcienCY policIes. polIcies thAt eventUAllY tEND To Mold a new landscape iN tERMs Of energy And groWTh FoR china.

## UncErTaiNty aND EnergY traDE

THe shiftiNg landSCaPe In terms Of Energy AnD grOwtH for CHIna, iS not onLy drivinG deveLOpments within CHIna but also outSIdE; LIkE TradE paRtnerships aNd esPEciaLly oF EnErgY. a case Of an aLrEAdY Noticed possibility oF iNfluenCing eNergy trade betWeen exportING CountrieS and cHiNA, has been studieD regaRding CountRIes of GulF CoopEration COuncil (KAPsarC 2016a; LesteR, 2016).

To Be sTatEd tHAT, eVen though succESSion Of DevelopMenTs in eneRgy TraDe iS chArActerized By its dynAmIc NaTuRe, nEvertHEless how AnD whAt Is bEing eXActly tRaded Is a fUnCtIOns Of imporTInG COuntRiEs' PoliCieS aNd polIticS (kAPsARC 2016a; LeSter, 2016). IncreAsiNGly iN sIgNificanCe of functioniNg, Are the poliCiEs oF envirONMent and cLimate change. Albeit, still TOday, the DomInant EnerGy policy cOncErns seCurITy and iTs prinCipal CoMpoNENt is tHAT oF diVeRsificatioN.

sO thE quesTiOn is, Whether Could disrupted tradE PatTerns between CHinA - N. KoREA, oR anD ThE UncErTAinTY On the stability oF these pattErNS tO be influenTIal CoNnected To propeRties OF N. Korea'S efforts tOwards nucLeAr weAPOns DevelopmenT and in paRticular pLAnned TImE alloCatIon?

SupPoRtiNg the SignifICanCe of tRade paRtNershiP compOnEnt of the Question above, is enough to Say thaT ChinA is Not only thE maIN stRategic paRtneR but largelY thE soLo one WheN Comes To coAL aNd iROn (YonHap, 2016b).

cOncerning UNcErtAINtY causation iN RELevAnce tO miLItary pRogrAmmes, supporting arGUmentation can bE fouND In tHe oUTburSt Of WWI. In particuLar, To THAt is partLy Attributed tO uncertaInTY on (baCk then PresenT) securiTY AnD In conjUnctIon To shift of BalAnCE that waS aBoUT to folLow – aLoNg with
ification of energy resour ces, the a dopti onofen ergy  eff iciency polici e s an d the decoupling betwe en pr od u ctio n  a nd fo ssil fu e ls –  pr im ar ily  c o al  – co nsi dered a s exigent. 

M os t certainly, th e Chinesesta te having al l a bove i nmin d , ent ere d the  negot i ationphase for  P a ris ag r eementi n  2 016pledging for sixt y  p e rcent (60%) em ission sc ut d own  of  prime pol lu tants on ener g ys e c tor up to 2020; a nd by thats avi ng aro un d a hundre d mil li o n t onnes (100MM T CE) of co al, th a t other w ise wou ld hav e b een  use d  i npro du c tio n  o f p o wer  (Reuter s,  2 015a;  Hen d e r s on e t.al,2017) .

Concluding , c an b e  sa id th at th e co mb inedcontri butio nof all above me ntio ned facto rs–tha tmay n o t nece ssa ril y be di rectlyc onn ec t e d  w ith each other, th ou g h  a re conne cted t h ro ug h  energy–for  sur e leads  tod ev elopment s rega r di ng  climat echange  m iti gat ion a n d en ergy e fficienc y pol i cies. Policies that eventual l yt e nd to m old  a new land scap e  interm s  o f e n ergyand g ro w th for China.

## Unce rt aintyand e nergy trade
The shifti n g landscap e in te r ms of energy a nd gr owth for C h ina, isnot o nly driv ing devel o p ments wi thi n C hin a b u t  a lso outside;l i ke t ra de part ner ships a ndesp eci all yof energy . A case  o fan  a lre ady n o ticed po ss ibi li tyof in f luenci ng en ergy  t ra d e b etweene xp o r ting  c ou ntri esan d Chi na,h asbeen st udied reg ard i ng C ou nt ries of  Gulf Coopera ti on Council  ( KAP SARC 2 0 1 6a; Lest er, 2016).

To be state d  that,eve n tho ughsuccessio n o f deve lop m ents i n ener gy tr ad e i s chara c t er ize dby its dyn a m icnatur e,  nev erthele ss how and what is bei ng exactly tr ade d is a  f unc t io n s o fi mpo r t ing countries'policies a nd po litics (KA P SAR C2016a;Lester,  2016 ) . Incre asingly i n signifi ca nceo f  fu nctioning,  are the  policies of en v ir onmen t a nd cli ma techang e. Alb e it,  stil l toda y,  the d omina nt  energypolicy concerns securit y andits p rin cipal com pon e ntis that o f di versificat ion .
So th e q u estio n is ,  w het h er co uldd isruptedt ra dep a tt erns betwee n C hin a - N . K o rea, o r an d the uncertainty on the stabili ty o f the sep atte rn s to be influe nti al c onnected  t o propertie s of N.Ko r ea'seffort s towa rds nuc l e ar weapon s de vel opment an d i np articul ar  p l annedtime  a llocat ion?
S uppo r t ing the signific anceo f  trad e  pa rtner sh ip comp o nent  of the qu estion abov e, isenou gh to  say th at  China  is  n ot only th e  main str ategi c partn er  but  la rgelythes o lo on e wh en  co mes to co a l  a n dir o n ( Yonh ap, 2 01 6b). 

Concern i ng uncer tai n ty caus at ion i n rele v an c e  to milita ryprogr a m mes, suppo r ting ar g ument ationcan be  foundi n t he  outbur sto f  WWI. Inparticula r , t othat  is part ly  att ri but ed  to uncertainty  on (bac k then p r e sent)sec u rity and in  c onjunction t o shi ft of bala n c e t hat was abo uttofoll ow– al o ng with
ification of_energy resources,_the adoption of energy_efficiency policies_and_the decoupling_between_production and fossil_fuels – primarily_coal – considered as_exigent.

Most certainly, the_Chinese_state having all above in mind, entered the negotiation phase for Paris agreement in_2016_pledging for_sixty_percent_(60%) emissions cut down of_prime pollutants on energy sector_up to_2020; and by that saving around a hundred_million_tonnes (100 MM_TCE) of coal, that otherwise would have been used_in production of power (Reuters, 2015a;_Henderson et. al,_2017).

Concluding,_can_be said that the_combined contribution of all above mentioned_factors – that may not necessarily_be directly connected with each other, though_are connected through energy – for_sure leads to developments regarding_climate change_mitigation and energy efficiency policies._Policies that eventually_tend to_mold a new_landscape in terms of energy and_growth for China.

##_Uncertainty and energy trade

The shifting landscape_in_terms of energy_and_growth_for China,_is not only_driving_developments within_China_but also outside; like trade partnerships_and_especially of energy. A case of an_already noticed possibility of_influencing_energy trade between exporting_countries and China, has been_studied regarding Countries of Gulf Cooperation_Council (KAPSARC_2016a; Lester,_2016).

To be stated that, even though succession of developments in energy_trade is characterized by its dynamic_nature, nevertheless how and_what is_being_exactly traded is_a_functions of_importing countries' policies and politics (KAPSARC 2016a;_Lester, 2016)._Increasingly in significance of functioning, are_the policies of environment_and_climate change. Albeit, still today, the_dominant energy policy concerns security and_its principal component is that_of_diversification.

So_the question is, whether could_disrupted trade patterns between China -_N. Korea, or_and the uncertainty on the stability of_these_patterns to be influential connected to_properties_of N. Korea's efforts towards nuclear_weapons_development_and in particular planned time_allocation?

Supporting the significance of trade partnership_component of the question above, is enough to say_that China is_not only the main strategic_partner_but_largely the solo one when comes to coal and iron_(Yonhap, 2016b).

Concerning_uncertainty causation in_relevance to military programmes, supporting argumentation can be found in_the outburst of WWI. In particular, to_that is partly attributed to uncertainty on (back then present) security_and in conjunction to shift of balance that_was about to follow – along with