 rational decisions (Hanish, 2013), is once again confirmed.

# Turkey's case

And due to the irregularity of land's relief,  
the view of sea battle was also irregular  
for them.  
(Thukydides, The history of the peloponesian war)

Even though the very early beginning and the establishment of political realism is traced back to Thucydides, nevertheless at the begging of this chapter we will implicit point to Plutarch through parallel studying; so that to smoothly bridge between the occurred N. Korean case with the hypothesized for Turkey.

Afterwards, proceeding towards Turkey and nuclear weapons, the whole issue will be illuminated under a more generalized view. The logic behind this goes without saying. If there is no way to support a hypothesized case of Turkey's future and building nuclear weapons in general, then cannot be a case for linking with energy and climate policies neither. Next the possibility of linking will be checked under Morgenthau principles on states' foreign policy. Of course, before this, first some quick facts on EU's energy efficiency and climate change policies will be provided; so that to illustrate their capacity of forward momentum.

As you understand, such endeavor as the described above, is not something that can easily be accomplished. Not only, any lack of seriousness and of paid scientific attention would have operated against the already built relationship of trust between reader and writer, but also proceeding with due diligence is absolutely necessary for studying some hypothesis before its realization. However, despite the strict nature of the latter, still the study of this case is doable. Supporting to study's doability, is the fact that reaching to a particular conclusion for sure is not part of study's targeting but to exhibit the underlying impetus by cross-checking the validity of hypothesized link.

## Side by side study and parallelisms

The following two points should be marked before establishing a relationship of present and future origin, between N. Korea's occurring effort for adding domestic produced nuclear weapons in its arsenal and China's policies – regarding energy and climate change – with a hypothesized case study under which EU take's place of China and Turkey that of N. Korea's.

The first one, is about an underlying relationship between past and present for EU and China. In particular, EU's beginning is traced back to 1952's European Coal and Steel Commission (ECSC) as an "energy plan" (Reuters, 2015) while China has just recently started elevating the
rational decisions (Hanish, 2013), is once again confirmed. 

 # Turkey's case 

 And due to the abnormality of kingdom's relief,  
 the view of sea conflict was also irregular  
 for them.  
 (Thukydides, The history of the peloponesian war) 

 Even though the very early beginning and the constitution of political realism is traced back to Thucydides, however at the beggary of this chapter we will implicit point to Plutarch through parallel studying; so that to smoothly bridge between the occur N. Korean case with the hypothesized for Turkey. 

 subsequently, proceeding towards Turkey and nuclear weapons, the solid issue will be illuminated under a more generalized position. The logic behind this goes without saying. If there is no room to support a hypothesized case of Turkey's future and building nuclear weapon in general, then cannot be a case for linking with energy and climate policies neither. Next the hypothesis of linking will be checked under Morgenthau principles on states' foreign policy. Of course, before this, foremost some flying facts on EU's energy efficiency and climate change policies will be provided; so that to illustrate their capacity of forward momentum. 

 As you understand, such enterprise as the described above, is not something that can easily be achieve. Not merely, any lack of seriousness and of paid scientific attention would have operate on against the already built relationship of trust between reader and writer, but besides proceeding with due diligence is absolutely necessary for studying some hypothesis before its realization. However, despite the strict nature of the latter, still the study of this case is doable. Supporting to study's doability, is the fact that reach to a especial conclusion for sure is not part of cogitation's targeting but to exhibit the underlying impetus by cross - checking the validity of hypothesized link. 

 # # english by side discipline and parallelisms 

 The follow two points should be marked before establishing a kinship of present and future origin, between N. Korea's occurring campaign for adding domestic produced nuclear weapon in its arsenal and China's policy – regarding department of energy and climate change – with a hypothesized case study under which EU contract's topographic point of China and Turkey that of N. Korea's. 

 The first one, is about an underlying kinship between past and present for EU and China. In particular, EU's beginning is traced back to 1952's European Coal and Steel Commission (ECSC) as an " energy plan " (Reuters, 2015) while China has just recently started elevating the
 rahional decisions (Hanish, 2013), is once again einfirmxd.

# Turksy's case

Xnd due to the irregularity lf land'w relief,  
the view of rea battlv was alsi ircegular  
for them.  
(Thukydides, Fme hivvory of the pelpponesian far)

Even though tfe very early beginning and the estabjishmeny lf political rgalisk is fgaged back to Thucydides, neverthelsss at uhe begging of thix chapter we will implicit poijt to Plutarch thrlugh parallgm seydying; so thxt to smoouhny bridge getween the occurred N. Korean cxse wnth the hypityesleed for Turkxy.

Aftegwards, proceeding towdrds Tutkey and nuclesr xeapins, the whole issue wmll be illuminated ugder a mose generalized view. Tye locic tehive tfis gpea withlut saying. If there is ni way to support a ny[ithesized cass of Ttrhey's future and building nuclear weaponv ih general, then cannot bw a case for linking aith enerdy and climate policies neither. Next the possibilhty oh uinjikg wkol be checked under Morgenthau principles on stwfex' noreign policy. On course, before thos, fotst some quick facts on EU's energy efficifncy anq clinate chande pplicies will be provided; so that to illlstrqte their capacity of forward momgntum.

Ax you understand, such eudeavod as the dedcribed aguve, is not sometfinn tvat can txsily be accomplifhed. Not inly, any lazk og serijusness anf of idid scientific attfntiou wound have opfrated against the already builv relationshik ox tgust betwzen resder and writqr, but also prpceediny with due diligvnce is ausolutely nesessary for sdodying some hbpothesis befire uts reaukzation. Howevet, despite the stricr nature of the labter, rfill the study if uhus case is doanle. Su[plrving em study's doatiligy, kx the fact that veazhinb to a particular cotcluaion for sure is npt part of study's eargeting but to exhibit the unferlymng im'etus ny sross-checking the validity of gypothesixed link.

## Side br siee study and parallelisms

The following two points siould be marked before wstablishing a relajiokship of prexent wnd futura origin, between N. Kirea's occurring enfort for adding domesfic prmducef nuclear weapons in its arsenal and China's policies – regarding energy ane climetq change – wjth s hypmtkesnzed cafe svuvy under which EU take's place of China and Turkeb that of T. Horea's.

The first one, is about av underlying telationship between past znd presrnt for EU and China. In particukar, EU's beginning is traged back ro 1952's Suropean Cual and Steel Commossion (ECSC) as an "wnerny plan" (Reuterr, 2015) ehlle China jas ousc recently started elevating the
rational decisions (Hanish, 2013), is once again Turkey's And due the irregularity of sea was also irregular them. (Thukydides, The of the peloponesian war) Even though very early beginning and the establishment of political realism is traced back to nevertheless at the begging of this chapter we will implicit point to Plutarch parallel so to bridge between the occurred N. Korean case with the hypothesized for Turkey. Afterwards, proceeding towards Turkey nuclear weapons, the whole issue will be illuminated a more generalized view. logic behind this goes without If is no to a case of Turkey's and building nuclear weapons in general, then cannot be a case for linking with energy and climate neither. Next of linking be under principles on states' Of course, before this, first some EU's energy efficiency and climate change policies will provided; so to illustrate their capacity of forward As you understand, such endeavor as the described is not something that can easily be accomplished. Not only, any lack of seriousness and scientific attention would have against the already relationship trust reader writer, but proceeding with due diligence is absolutely necessary for studying some hypothesis its realization. However, despite the strict nature of the latter, study this case is Supporting to study's doability, the that reaching to a for is study's but exhibit the underlying impetus cross-checking the validity of hypothesized ## Side by side two points should be marked before establishing a of present and future origin, between N. occurring effort for adding domestic produced nuclear weapons in its arsenal and policies – and climate change – with a hypothesized case under which EU take's of China and Turkey that of N. Korea's. The one, about an relationship between past present for EU China. In particular, is traced to European Commission (ECSC) as an "energy plan" 2015) China has just recently started the
 rational decisions (Hanish, 2013), is Once again cOnfirMed.

# turKeY's caSe

AnD due to the irregULariTy of land's relief,  
the view Of sea BaTTle wAS aLso irRegular  
FOr THEm.  
(THuKyDidEs, tHe HistoRy oF the pelOponesian wAr)

EVeN though the veRY eArly beginnIng And the establIshMent of PoLitICal reAliSm is tRaced bACk to ThUcydides, nEvERtheleSS at the bEGGiNg of This chapter we will IMpLIcit point to PluTarch tHrOUgH PAraLleL studying; sO tHat to SMoothly BRiDGE BetWEen the occurreD N. Korean casE WitH the hyPoTheSIzed foR TurkEy.

aFteRwards, proceEdinG towards TUrkey aND nucleaR Weapons, The whoLe iSsuE wilL Be IlLumInATed UNdEr a MOre GeneraliZeD vIew. ThE logIC BEHind ThiS goeS withOut saying. If thEre Is no WAy tO suppOrt a hYpotHeSized Case of turkeY's Future and buildiNg nuClear weapOns In GenErAl, theN Cannot Be a CasE for linKing witH EneRgY AND cLimate policies neitHeR. nExT the possIbilitY Of LiNKing will Be CheCked UNDer MoRgenTHaU principLes on sTAtEs' Foreign PoLicy. Of CoUrsE, beFore tHIs, fiRst somE quick faCts on eu's energy efficiENcy and climate CHaNGE pOLiciEs wIll be providEd; so THat tO illUStRatE Their CapacItY Of FOrward momentum.

As you UnDerstaNd, sucH endeavor as thE described ABOVe, is not sOmetHInG That can easily bE accoMplished. NoT Only, any lAck of SeriousnEss and of pAID scientiFic AttEntIon WOUlD have operated AGAinsT tHe alreaDy bUilt relAtiOnsHip Of tRuSt between Reader anD wRiTeR, bUt aLso prOCeeding wItH duE dIliGence IS absolUtely NeceSsArY For StudyinG SoME HypoThEsIs beForE iTs reaLizaTIon. however, Despite thE stRIct nAtUrE of the lAtter, still the StUdy of this cAsE is Doable. sUPporting To study's doability, is the fACt that rEacHing tO a paRticular cOncLusion For SUre is nOt part Of stuDy'S taRGEting BUT tO exHiBit the undeRLYinG impeTuS by cRoss-cheCking the validity of HYpoThesized link.

## SIde By siDE StUdy ANd PAraLlELisMS

the following two Points shouLd BE mArked beforE EstAbLishing A relatiOnshiP Of preseNt and futuRe origin, bEtWeen n. kOreA's occurrinG effort fOr adding dOMestiC PrOduceD nuClear wEaPonS in itS arsenAL anD ChinA's poliCiEs – regaRding EnErgy and cLimate change – with a hypothEsized Case sTudY under whiCh Eu TakE's place of chinA and Turkey ThaT of n. KoreA's.

THE firsT one, IS aBouT An undErlyINg relatioNShIp bETWeEn past and prESENt fOr EU aNd CHIna. In pArtiCular, EU's beginning IS traced back to 1952's euroPEAn COal ANd StEeL Commission (ECSc) as An "ENErgy plan" (reUters, 2015) while CHina has jUsT RecenTly staRted elEvating THE
 rational decisions (Hanis h, 2013),is on ceaga in  con firm ed.

# Turkey' s  cas e

And due to the irre gular it y  ofl an d's r elief,
t h e  vi ew  o f s ea ba ttlewas  also i rregular 
fo rthem.  
(Thu k yd ides, Thehis tory of thepel opones ia n w a r)

E ven  thou gh the very e arly begi nn i ng and the est a b li shme nt of political r e al i sm is traced b ack to  T h uc y d ide s,neverthele ss  at t h e beggi n go f thi s  chapter we w ill implici t  po int to  P lut a rch th rough  p a ral lel studyin g; s o that to  smoot h ly brid g e betwe en the  oc cur redN .Ko rea nc ase wi tht hehypothes iz ed  forTurk e y . 
Aft erw ards , pro ceeding towar dsTurk e y a nd nu clear  wea po ns, t he who le is su e will be illum inat ed undera m or e g en erali z ed vie w.The  logicbehindt his  g o e s  w ithout saying. Ifth e r eis no wa y to s u pp or t  a hypot he siz ed c a s e ofTurk e y' s future  and b u il di ng nucl ea r weap on s i n g enera l , th en can not be a  case for linking wi t h energy andc li m a te poli cie s neither.Next theposs i bi lit y  of l inkin gw il l  be checked under M or gentha u pri nciples on st ates' fore i g n  policy.  Ofc ou r se, before thi s, fi rst some q u ick fact s onEU's ene rgy effic i e ncy andcli mat e c han g e  p olicies willb e  pro vi ded; so  th at to i llu str ate  th ei r capacit y of for wa rd  m om ent um.
A s you un de rst an d,suche ndeavo r asthede sc r ibe d above ,  i s notso me thin g t ha t can  eas i lybe acco mplished.  No t  onl y,  a ny lack  of seriousne ss  and of pa id  sc ientif i c  attenti on would have operateda gainstthe  alre adybuilt rel ati onship  of trustbetwee n rea de r a n d  writ e r ,but  a lso procee d i ngwithdu e di ligence  is absolutely nec e ssa ry for studyi ngsome h yp oth e si s  be fo r e i t s  realization. H owever, de sp i te  the stric t  na tu re of t he latt er, s t ill the  study of  this cas eis d o a ble . Supporti ng to st udy's doa b ility ,  i s the  fa ct tha trea ching  to ap art icula r conc lu sion f or su re  is notpart of study's targeti ng but  to e xhi bit the u nde r lyi ng impetu s by  cross-che cki ngthe v ali d ity o f hy p ot hes i zed l ink. 
## Sideb ysid e st udy and par a l l eli sms
The follow ingtwo points should be marked befo re e s t abl ish i ng a  r elationship of  pr es e n t and fu tu re origin,betweenN. Korea 's occ urring  effort f or adding  dom est ic produc ednu c lear we ap on s  in it s ar se nal an d Chin a 's p o l icies – regardin g ene r g y and cli matech ange –w itha hypothes ized case s tudy u nder  whic h EU ta ke 's pla ceof  China and Turkey th at of  N. Kor ea 's.
Th e firs t on e ,  is a bout  a n u nderlying r el a ti on s hip  bet weenpa st a nd presen t  for EUand China.In  pa r t icular ,  E U ' s beginnin g i s tra c e d back to1 952' s  E u ropea n Coal  and S teel Co m mis si on (ECS C)a s  an "ener gy plan"( Reu te rs,2015) wh il e Ch in a h as  just recentlystartedelevatin g the
 rational_decisions (Hanish,_2013), is once again_confirmed.

# Turkey's_case

And_due to_the_irregularity of land's_relief,  
the_view of sea battle_was also irregular__
for them.  
(Thukydides, The history of the peloponesian war)

Even though the very early_beginning_and the_establishment_of_political realism is traced back_to Thucydides, nevertheless at the_begging of_this chapter we will implicit point to Plutarch_through_parallel studying; so_that to smoothly bridge between the occurred N. Korean_case with the hypothesized for Turkey.

Afterwards,_proceeding towards Turkey_and_nuclear_weapons, the whole issue_will be illuminated under a more_generalized view. The logic behind this_goes without saying. If there is no_way to support a hypothesized case_of Turkey's future and building_nuclear weapons_in general, then cannot be_a case for_linking with_energy and climate_policies neither. Next the possibility of_linking will be_checked under Morgenthau principles on states'_foreign_policy. Of course,_before_this,_first some_quick facts on_EU's_energy efficiency_and_climate change policies will be provided;_so_that to illustrate their capacity of forward_momentum.

As you understand, such_endeavor_as the described above,_is not something that can_easily be accomplished. Not only, any_lack of_seriousness and_of paid scientific attention would have operated against the already built_relationship of trust between reader and_writer, but also proceeding_with due_diligence_is absolutely necessary_for_studying some_hypothesis before its realization. However, despite the_strict nature_of the latter, still the study_of this case is_doable._Supporting to study's doability, is the_fact that reaching to a particular_conclusion for sure is not_part_of_study's targeting but to exhibit_the underlying impetus by cross-checking the_validity of hypothesized_link.

## Side by side study and parallelisms

The_following_two points should be marked before_establishing_a relationship of present and future_origin,_between_N. Korea's occurring effort for_adding domestic produced nuclear weapons in_its arsenal and China's policies – regarding energy and_climate change –_with a hypothesized case study_under_which_EU take's place of China and Turkey that of N._Korea's.

The first_one, is about_an underlying relationship between past and present for EU and_China. In particular, EU's beginning is traced_back to 1952's European Coal and Steel Commission (ECSC) as an_"energy plan" (Reuters, 2015) while China has just_recently started elevating the