-Darwinism. The theory maintains that millions of living beings formed as a result of a process whereby numerous complex organs of these organisms (e.g., ears, eyes, lungs, and wings) underwent "mutations," that is, genetic disorders. Yet, there is an outright scientific fact that totally undermines this theory: Mutations do not cause living beings to develop; on the contrary, they are always harmful.

The reason for this is very simple: DNA has a very complex structure, and random effects can only harm it. The American geneticist B. G. Ranganathan explains this as follows:

First, genuine mutations are very rare in nature. Secondly, most mutations are harmful since they are random, rather than orderly changes in the structure of genes; any random change in a highly ordered system will be for the worse, not for the better. For example, if an earthquake were to shake a highly ordered structure such as a building, there would be a random change in the framework of the building which, in all probability, would not be an improvement.9

Not surprisingly, no mutation example, which is useful, that is, which is observed to develop the genetic code, has been observed so far. All mutations have proved to be harmful. It was understood that mutation, which is presented as an "evolutionary mechanism," is actually a genetic occurrence that harms living things, and leaves them disabled. (The most common effect of mutation on human beings is cancer.) Of course, a destructive mechanism cannot be an "evolutionary mechanism." Natural selection, on the other hand, "can do nothing by itself," as Darwin also accepted. This fact shows us that there is no "evolutionary mechanism" in nature. Since no evolutionary mechanism exists, no such any imaginary process called "evolution" could have taken place.

The Fossil Record: No Sign of Intermediate Forms

The clearest evidence that the scenario suggested by the theory of evolution did not take place is the fossil record.

According to this theory, every living species has sprung from a predecessor. A previously existing species turned into something else over time and all species have come into being in this way. In other words, this transformation proceeds gradually over millions of years.

Had this been the case, numerous intermediary species should have existed and lived within this long transformation period.

For instance, some half-fish/half-reptiles should have lived in the past which had acquired
-Darwinism. The theory maintains that millions of living being form as a result of a process whereby numerous complex organs of these organism (e.g., ears, center, lung, and wings) underwent " mutations, " that is, genetic disorders. however, there is an outright scientific fact that totally cave this hypothesis: Mutations do not cause survive beings to develop; on the reverse, they are always harmful. 

 The reason for this is very simple: deoxyribonucleic acid has a very complex structure, and random effects can only harm it. The American geneticist B. G. Ranganathan explains this as come: 

 First, genuine mutations are very rare in nature. Secondly, most mutations are harmful since they are random, preferably than orderly changes in the structure of genes; any random change in a highly ordered system will be for the worse, not for the better. For example, if an earthquake were to shake a highly ordered structure such as a building, there would be a random change in the framework of the building which, in all probability, would not be an improvement.9 

 Not amazingly, no mutation model, which is useful, that is, which is observe to originate the genetic code, has been observed so far. All mutation have proved to be harmful. It was understood that mutation, which is presented as an " evolutionary mechanism, " is actually a familial occurrence that harms living things, and leaves them disabled. (The most coarse effect of mutation on human beings is cancer .) Of course, a destructive mechanism cannot be an " evolutionary mechanism. " lifelike selection, on the early hand, " can do nothing by itself, " as Darwin also accepted. This fact shows us that there is no " evolutionary mechanism " in nature. Since no evolutionary mechanism exist, no such any imaginary process called " development " could have taken stead. 

 The Fossil Record: No Sign of Intermediate Forms 

 The clean evidence that the scenario suggest by the theory of development did not take place is the fossil record. 

 harmonize to this theory, every survive species has sprung from a harbinger. A previously existing species turned into something else over time and all species have come into being in this way. In other words, this transformation proceeds gradually over millions of years. 

 Had this been the event, numerous intermediary species should have existed and populate within this long transformation period. 

 For instance, some half - fish / half - reptiles should have survive in the past which had acquired
-Darainism. The theory maintalns that millions of liting bejngs foroed as a result of a process wyerebt numerous complex orgxns of thvse organusms (w.g., ears, eyxa, lungs, and wjkgs) uudxrwent "mutationx," that is, cenetic disordarr. Vet, there is an outright scientific sact thst totally underiinex thia theory: Mutations do not cause libing bepngs to develop; om the contrary, they are alaays harmful.

The reason for this iw vewt simple: DNA has a verj complex sjructure, and random effects can unly karm it. The Anerlwan geneticmst B. D. Ranganathak explahns thix as follows:

Fivst, gxnuibe mutations are very rare in nature. Sesondly, movt mutations are haemdul shnce theh ard rznvom, ratheg tian orderly changes in the structure of gtnef; any random cgange yn a highly ordered system will be for tht worae, not for the better. Fir example, if an eartjquake wewe to shake a highly ordered structure such as a tuildmne, tkcve wuylf be a random change in the framework of the fhikdpng which, in all irobability, would moh ng an improvemevt.9

Not surlrisingly, no mutatlon exaiple, qhich is tsefil, that is, which is observee to develop rhe genetic code, hcs been obsexved sp far. All mutations have prored to be harmful. It was uhaerstood that mugatpon, fhich is presented as an "edolutionacy meehanism," ks avtuallr a genetif occmsrence that harms piviny thitgs, and lewves them disabled. (The most common effect of kudatpon on huian bcings is cancer.) Of course, a dgstructivz mechxnism cannkt be ai "evolutionawy mechanism." Twtural selecvion, on tre orher hand, "cxv do nothing bu itself," cf Daewin also accepted. Thka fact shows us thqt there is no "rvouutyojacy mesvanism" in nadure. Sivve no evolutionavy oechsnism exists, no such any imaginary process cwlled "evilution" sould have talen place.

The Fossip Recmrd: No Sogn of Intermediate Forms

The cleadest evidfncc that the scqnarlo soggested by the theory of evolution did not take poace is the fossil record.

According to uhis theory, etery lyving spewies has sprung from a predecessor. A kreviously existing spedies tgrned into something else over time and all species have come into being in thus way. In other wodds, yhis nrausfprmatijn pcoreeds gradually oner millions of years.

Had this bexn the casa, uumerous intermediary species sfould have exksted and lived within tgis long transformation period.

For instamce, some half-fish/half-repbiles shoyld hzve lingd mn the past which hac acqunred
-Darwinism. The theory maintains that millions of formed a result a process whereby organisms ears, eyes, lungs, wings) underwent "mutations," is, genetic disorders. Yet, there is outright scientific fact that totally undermines this theory: Mutations do not cause living to develop; on the contrary, they are always harmful. The reason for this very DNA a complex structure, and random effects can only harm it. The American geneticist B. G. Ranganathan explains as follows: First, genuine mutations are very rare nature. Secondly, most mutations harmful since they are random, than changes in structure genes; random change in highly ordered system will be for the worse, not for the better. For example, if an earthquake to shake ordered structure as building, would be a in the framework of the building probability, would not be an improvement.9 Not surprisingly, mutation example, is useful, that is, which is to develop the genetic code, has been observed far. All mutations have proved to be harmful. It was understood that mutation, which is an "evolutionary mechanism," is a genetic occurrence harms things, leaves disabled. (The common effect of mutation on human beings is cancer.) Of course, destructive mechanism cannot be an "evolutionary mechanism." Natural selection, on hand, do nothing by as Darwin also accepted. fact us that there is mechanism" nature. mechanism no any imaginary process called could have taken place. The Record: No Sign of that the scenario suggested by the theory of did not take place is the fossil According to this theory, every living species has sprung from a predecessor. previously existing into something else over time and all species come into being in way. In other words, this transformation proceeds gradually over of Had this the case, numerous species should have and lived within transformation period. instance, half-fish/half-reptiles in the past which had acquired
-Darwinism. The theory maintaiNs that millIons oF liVinG bEingS forMed as a result of A ProcEss whereby numerous compLex orGaNS of tHEsE orgaNisms (e.g., EArS, EYes, LuNgS, anD wINgS) undeRweNt "mutatIons," that is, GenEtIc disorders. YET, tHere is an ouTriGht scientifiC faCt that ToTalLY undeRmiNes thIs theoRY: MutatIons do not CaUSe liviNG beings TO DeVeloP; on the contrary, theY ArE Always harmful.

THe reasOn FOr THIs iS veRy simple: DNa hAs a veRY compleX StRUCTurE, And random effeCts can only hARm iT. The AmErIcaN GenetiCist B. g. RANgaNathan explaIns tHis as follOws:

FirST, genuinE MutatioNs are vEry RarE in nATuRe. secOnDLy, mOSt MutATioNs are harMfUl Since They ARE RAndoM, raTher Than oRderly changes In tHe stRUctUre of Genes; Any rAnDom chAnge in A highLy Ordered system wiLl be For the worSe, nOt For ThE bettER. For exAmpLe, iF an eartHquake wERe tO sHAKE a Highly ordered strucTuRE SuCh as a buiLding, tHErE wOUld be a raNdOm cHangE IN the fRameWOrK of the buIlding WHiCh, In all prObAbilitY, wOulD noT be an IMproVement.9

not surprIsingLY, no mutation exaMPle, which is useFUl, THAt IS, whiCh iS observed to DeveLOp thE genETiC coDE, has bEen obSeRVeD So far. All mutations haVe Proved To be hArmful. It was unDerstood thAT MUtation, wHich IS pREsented as an "evoLutioNary mechanISm," is actuAlly a Genetic oCcurrence THAt harms lIviNg tHinGs, aND LeAves them disabLED. (The MoSt commoN efFect of mUtaTioN on HumAn Beings is cAncer.) Of cOuRsE, a DeStrUctivE MechanisM cAnnOt Be aN "evolUTionarY mechAnisM." NAtURal SelectiON, oN THe otHeR hAnd, "cAn dO nOthinG by iTSelF," as DarwIn also accEptED. ThiS fAcT shows uS that there is nO "eVolutionarY mEchAnism" iN NAture. SinCe no evolutionary mechaniSM exists, No sUch anY imaGinary proCesS calleD "evOLution" Could hAve taKeN plACE.

The FOSSiL ReCoRd: No Sign of iNTerMediaTe formS

The cleArest evidence that tHE scEnario suggestEd bY the THEoRy oF EvOLutIoN Did NOT take place is the Fossil recoRd.

aCcOrding to thIS thEoRy, every Living sPecieS Has spruNg from a prEdecessor. a pReviOUSly Existing spEcies turNed into soMEthinG ElSe oveR tiMe and aLl SpeCies hAve comE IntO beinG in thiS wAy. In otHer woRdS, this traNsformation proceeds gradUally oVer miLliOns of yearS.

HaD ThiS been the cAse, nUmerous intErmEdiAry spEciES shouLd haVE eXisTEd and LiveD Within thiS LoNg tRANsFormation peRIOD.

FoR instAncE, Some haLf-fiSh/half-reptiles shoULd have lived in tHe paST WhiCh hAD acqUiRed
-Darwinism. The theory mai ntains tha t mil lio nsof  liv ingbeings formeda s aresult of a process wh ereby  n u mero u scompl ex orga n so f  th es eorg an i sm s (e. g.,  ears,eyes, lung s,an d wings) und e rw ent "mutat ion s," that is,  ge neticdi sor d ers.Yet , the re isa n outr ight scie nt i fic fa c t thatt o ta llyundermines this t h eo r y: Mutations d o notca u se l ivi ngbeings tode velop ;  on the co n t r ary ,  they are alw ays harmful . 

T he rea so n f o r this  is v er y  si mple: DNA h as a  very com plex s t ructure ,  and ra ndom e ffe cts  can on ly  ha rm it. Th e A m eri can gene ti ci st B.  G.R a n g anat han  exp lains  this as foll ows :

F i rst , gen uinemuta ti ons a re ver y rar ein nature. Seco ndly , most mu tat io nsar e har m ful si nce  th ey arerandom, rat he r t ha n orderly changesin t he  structu re ofg en es ;  any ran do m c hang e in ahigh l yorderedsystem wi ll  be for  t he wor se , n otfor t h e be tter.For exam ple,i f an earthquak e  were to shak e  a h ig h ly o rde red structu re s u ch a s ab ui ldi n g, th ere w ou l db e a random change i nthe fr amewo rk of the bui lding whic h , in all p roba b il i ty, would notbe an  improveme n t.9

Not  surp risingly , no muta t i on examp le,  wh ich  is u se ful, that is, w hich  i s obser ved  to dev elo p t hegen et ic code,has been  o bs er ve d s o far .  All mut at ion shav e pro v ed tobe ha rmfu l.  I t  wa s under s to o d  tha tmu tati on,  w hichis p r ese nted as  an "evol uti o nary  m ec hanism, " is actually  a  genetic o cc urr ence t h a t harmsliving things, and leav e s themdis abled . (T he most c omm on eff ect of mut ationon hu ma n b e i ngs i s ca nce r. ) Of cours e ,  adestr uc tive  mechan ism cannot be an " e vol utionary mech ani sm." N at ura l  s e lec ti o n,o n  the other hand , "can dono t hi ng by itse l f,"  a s Darwi n alsoaccep t ed. Thi s fact sh ows us th at  the r e  is  no "evolu tionarymechanism "  in n a tu re. S inc e no e vo lut ionar y mech a nis m exi sts, n osuch a ny im ag inary pr ocess called "evolution " coul d hav e t aken plac e.The  Fossil R ecor d: No Sign  of  In terme dia t e For ms
T he  cl e arest  evi d ence that th e s c e na rio suggest e d bythe t heo r y of e volu tion did not take place is the f ossi l rec ord . 

Ac co rding to thisthe or y ,  every l iv ing species  has spr un g  from  a pre decess or. A p r e vi o usly e xist ing  speciestur ne d  into s om et h ing el se o ve r time  and a l l sp e c ies have come in to be i n g int his  way.  I n other word s, this tr ansformatio n proc eeds  grad ually o ve r mill ion sof years.Had thisbeenthe cas e,  num ero us int erme d i ary s peci es  sh ould have e xi s te da ndlive d wit hi n th is long t r ansforma tio n  period .
Fo r instan c e, s ome half-f ish /half - r eptiles sh o uldh av e  live d in t he pas t which had  a cquired 
-Darwinism. The_theory maintains_that millions of living_beings formed_as_a result_of_a process whereby_numerous complex organs_of these organisms (e.g.,_ears, eyes, lungs,_and_wings) underwent "mutations," that is, genetic disorders. Yet, there is an outright scientific fact_that_totally undermines_this_theory:_Mutations do not cause living_beings to develop; on the_contrary, they_are always harmful.

The reason for this is very_simple:_DNA has a_very complex structure, and random effects can only harm_it. The American geneticist B. G._Ranganathan explains this_as_follows:

First,_genuine mutations are very_rare in nature. Secondly, most mutations_are harmful since they are random,_rather than orderly changes in the structure_of genes; any random change in_a highly ordered system will_be for_the worse, not for the_better. For example,_if an_earthquake were to_shake a highly ordered structure such_as a building,_there would be a random change_in_the framework of_the_building_which, in_all probability, would_not_be an_improvement.9

Not_surprisingly, no mutation example, which is_useful,_that is, which is observed to develop_the genetic code, has_been_observed so far. All_mutations have proved to be_harmful. It was understood that mutation,_which is_presented as_an "evolutionary mechanism," is actually a genetic occurrence that harms living_things, and leaves them disabled. (The_most common effect of_mutation on_human_beings is cancer.)_Of_course, a_destructive mechanism cannot be an "evolutionary mechanism."_Natural selection,_on the other hand, "can do_nothing by itself," as_Darwin_also accepted. This fact shows us_that there is no "evolutionary mechanism"_in nature. Since no evolutionary_mechanism_exists,_no such any imaginary process_called "evolution" could have taken place.

The_Fossil Record: No_Sign of Intermediate Forms

The clearest evidence that_the_scenario suggested by the theory of_evolution_did not take place is the_fossil_record.

According_to this theory, every living_species has sprung from a predecessor._A previously existing species turned into something else over_time and all_species have come into being_in_this_way. In other words, this transformation proceeds gradually over millions_of years.

Had_this been the_case, numerous intermediary species should have existed and lived within_this long transformation period.

For instance, some half-fish/half-reptiles_should have lived in the past which had acquired