ized Gnani has no ownership of his body and because of this he is not liable for the body's actions. Secondly the Gnani does not renounce nor take up anything. They did not understand the meaning of 'not having ownership of the body', so I asked them why they thought that I commit violence in such acts. One person asked whether it would constitute violence if he were to crush an insect under his foot. I told him that it is violence because he believes that it is his foot that steps on the insect. I told him that I have no ownership over this body and hence there is no doer ship in the act.

He wanted me to give him examples and define what a person owns and what he does not. I gave him the following example: There is a vacant plot surrounded by shops in an affluent area of a town. Someone has informed the police about hidden excise goods buried there. The site is overgrown with vegetation after the rainfall. The police start to dig and they unearth the goods. They arrest Laxmichand who they were told was the owner of the land. Laxmichand tells them that he was no longer the owner and that he had sold the land two weeks ago. When the new owner is interrogated, he protests to being accused and tells the police that he had only bought the land a fortnight ago, while the goods must have been buried before the rainy season on account of the grass growing over it. The police however are only concerned about the present-day ownership of the land and although the new owner purchased it only fifteen days ago, he is still held responsible because he is the owner now. The problem is with the ownership. If one were to look at it as it is, it was obvious that the goods were buried before the rain. Past ownership has no value or responsibility. Current owner bears all responsibility.

"I am Chandulal" is being owner of the body complex and hence responsible for all its acts. " I am pure Soul" is the State of the Gnani where is no ownership at all and hence no liability of violence at all.

You will only find a resolution when you understand everything from such detailed perspective. How else can this puzzle be solved?

"It is a puzzle. The world is the puzzle itself. How can one solve this puzzle? There are two viewpoints to solving this puzzle: One'relative' viewpoint, one'real' viewpoint."

If one does not
ized Gnani has no ownership of his body and because of this he is not liable for the soundbox's legal action. Secondly the Gnani does not foreswear nor assume up anything. They did not understand the meaning of' not having possession of the body', so I asked them why they think that I commit violence in such act. One person asked whether it would constitute ferocity if he were to crush an insect under his foot. I told him that it is violence because he believes that it is his foot that pace on the insect. I told him that I have no possession over this body and hence there cost no doer ship in the act. 

 He desire me to give him examples and define what a person owns and what he does not. I give him the following example: There is a vacant plot surrounded by shops in an affluent area of a township. Someone has inform the police about hidden excise goods buried there. The site is overgrown with vegetation after the rainfall. The police start to dig and they unearth the good. They arrest Laxmichand who they were told was the owner of the farming. Laxmichand tells them that he was no longer the owner and that he had sold the land two weeks ago. When the newfangled owner is interrogated, he protests to being accused and tells the police that he had merely bought the land a fortnight ago, while the goods must have been buried before the rainy season on account of the eatage growing over it. The police however are only concerned about the present - day possession of the land and although the modern owner buy it merely fifteen days ago, he is still held creditworthy because he is the owner now. The problem is with the ownership. If one were to look at it as it is, it was obvious that the goods were buried before the rain. Past ownership has no value or responsibility. Current owner hold all responsibility. 

 " I am Chandulal " is being owner of the consistency complex and hence creditworthy for all its acts. " I am pure Soul " is the State of the Gnani where is no ownership at wholly and hence no liability of ferocity at all. 

 You will only find a resolution when you understand everything from such detailed position. How else can this puzzle be solved? 

 " It is a puzzle. The world is the puzzle itself. How can one solve this puzzle? There be two viewpoints to solving this puzzle: One'relative' viewpoint, one'real' viewpoint. " 

 If one does not
izef Gnani has no ownership of his body anb becauve of fhis he ks not liable for the body's ectiins. Stbondly the Gnani does not renolnce nor rake yp anythinj. They dlb not mndervvand the meaninn of 'not haeing ownership ow che body', so I asked them why they thjught tnah I commit viojenct ig sudh acts. One person asked whether if would constitute voolence if he were to crusj an insect under his voot. I told him rhat it is vkolence bebcuse he beljeves that it is his foot that rteps on the inwext. L told him tiat I rave no ownevxhip oeer thix body and henge thxre us no doer ship in thx act.

He wanted me to give him eramples and define whqt a petson mwns qnd whzt hs does nov. I gave hij the folloqing example: There os q vacant plot surrotnqed by shops in an affluent area of a tmwn. Someone has informed tye police about hiddej excise doods buried there. The site is overgrown with vegatatikv aybcr tfw gainfall. The police start to dig and they unewdtn nhe goods. They arvest Laxmichand whp hhri were told war the ownsr of the land. Laxlichand tellw them thwt hr was no longer the owner abd that he hcd wold the land two ceeks ago. Whzn the new pwner is interrogated, hz protssts to beijg accuses and tells the pulibe tvat he had only bought the land a firtnnght ago, whike the goods mush havc been buried beforf the rdiny seasoj on account of the grass growiij over it. The pmlibe howevex are pnly concerneq about the prgsent-day jwnerrhip of thv land anv although tre new owner [orchased it oily fifteqn dqys qgo, he kr still held rrsponsiblv yecause hw is the owner now. Thg lroblem is with tht iwnership. If ome derq no kojn at it as id is, it eas ocvious ukat ghe boods were buried bexore the rain. Past ownrrfhip has no valuq or responsinility. Current owntr beacs all resppnsybility.

"I am Chandulal" is being owner of thc body complev ane hence resppnsible for all its acts. " I am pure Souo" is the State of rhe Gnani where is uo ownership et all and henca no liability of viilence at all.

You eill only find a resomution when you understand everything from such detailed perspective. How else can thus puzvlq be solved?

"Jt ix a plzzjz. The wjrld ms the puzzle itsvlf. How can one solve this puzzlx? There ara cwo viewpoints to solving thix ouzzle: One'relxtive' viewpoint, one'real' biewpoiny."

If one does not
ized Gnani has no ownership of his because this he not liable for Gnani not renounce nor up anything. They not understand the meaning of 'not ownership of the body', so I asked them why they thought that I violence in such acts. One person asked whether it would constitute violence if were crush insect his foot. I told him that it is violence because he believes that it is his that steps on the insect. I told him I have no ownership this body and hence there no ship in act. wanted to give him and define what a person owns and what he does not. I gave him the following example: is a surrounded by in affluent of a town. informed the police about hidden excise The site is overgrown with vegetation after the The police to dig and they unearth the They arrest Laxmichand who they were told was owner of the land. Laxmichand tells them that he was no longer the owner and had sold the land weeks ago. When new is he to being and tells the police that he had only bought the land fortnight ago, while the goods must have been buried before season account of the growing over it. The however only concerned about the of land new purchased only fifteen days ago, is still held responsible because is the owner now. ownership. If one were to look at it it is, it was obvious that the were buried before the rain. Past ownership has no value or responsibility. owner bears "I am Chandulal" is being owner of the complex and hence responsible all its acts. " I am pure Soul" is State the Gnani is no ownership all and hence liability of violence You will find resolution everything from such detailed perspective. How can puzzle be solved? "It is puzzle. is the puzzle itself. How can one solve this puzzle? There are two viewpoints to puzzle: One'relative' viewpoint, one'real' If does not
ized Gnani has no ownership of His body and BecauSe oF thIs He is Not lIable for the bodY'S actIons. Secondly the Gnani doEs not ReNOuncE NoR take Up anythINg. tHEy dId NoT unDeRStAnd thE meAning of 'Not having oWneRsHip of the body', SO I Asked them wHy tHey thought thAt I Commit ViOleNCe in sUch Acts. ONe persON asked Whether it WoULd consTItute viOLEnCe if He were to crush an inSEcT Under his foot. I tOld him ThAT iT IS viOleNce because He BelieVEs that iT Is HIS FooT That steps on thE insect. I tolD Him That I hAvE no OWnershIp oveR tHIs bOdy and hence TherE is no doer Ship in THe act.

He WAnted me To give Him ExaMpleS AnD dEfiNe WHat A PeRsoN OwnS and what He DoEs not. i gavE HIM The fOllOwinG examPle: There is a vaCanT ploT SurRoundEd by sHops In An affLuent aRea of A tOwn. Someone has inFormEd the poliCe aBoUt hIdDen exCIse gooDs bUriEd there. the site IS ovErGROWn With vegetation afteR tHE RaInfall. ThE policE StArT To dig and ThEy uNearTH The goOds. THEy Arrest LaXmichaND wHo They werE tOld was ThE owNer Of the LAnd. LAxmichAnd tells Them tHAt he was no longeR The owner and thAT hE HAd SOld tHe lAnd two weeks Ago. WHEn thE new OWnEr iS InterRogatEd, HE pROtests to being accuseD aNd tellS the pOlice that he haD only boughT THE land a foRtniGHt AGo, while the goodS must Have been buRIed beforE the rAiny seasOn on accouNT Of the graSs gRowIng OveR IT. THe police howevER Are oNlY concerNed About thE prEseNt-dAy oWnErship of tHe land anD aLtHoUgH thE new oWNer purchAsEd iT oNly FifteEN days aGo, he iS stiLl HeLD reSponsibLE bECAuse He Is The oWneR nOw. The ProbLEm iS with thE ownershiP. If ONe weRe To Look at iT as it is, it was oBvIous that thE gOodS were bURIed beforE the rain. Past ownership haS No value Or rEsponSibiLity. CurreNt oWner beArs ALl respOnsibiLity.

"I Am chaNDUlal" iS BEiNg oWnEr of the bodY COmpLex anD hEnce ResponsIble for all its acts. " I AM puRe Soul" is the StAte Of thE gNaNi wHErE Is nO oWNerSHIp at all and hence No liabilitY oF ViOlence at alL.

you WiLl only fInd a resOlutiON when yoU understaNd everythInG froM SUch Detailed peRspectivE. How else cAN this PUzZle be SolVed?

"It iS a PuzZle. ThE world IS thE puzzLe itseLf. how can One soLvE this puzZle? There are two viewpointS to solVing tHis Puzzle: One'RelATivE' viewpoinT, one'Real' viewpoInt."

if oNe doeS noT
ized Gnani has no ownershi p of his b ody a ndbec au se o f th is he is not l i able  for the body's action s. Se co n dlyt he  Gnan i doesn ot r eno un ce  no rt ak e upany thing.They did n otun derstand the me aning of ' not  having owne rsh ip ofth e b o dy',soI ask ed the m  why t hey thoug ht that I commitv i ol ence  in such acts. On e  p e rson asked whe ther i tw ou l d  co nst itute viol en ce if he were to c r ush an insect und er his foot .  Itold h im  th a t it i s vio le n cebecause hebeli eves that  it is his foo t  that s teps o n t heinse c t.  I  to ld him th atI  ha ve no ow ne rs hip o vert h i s  bod y a nd h encethere is no d oer  shi p  in  theact.
Hewa ntedme togivehi m examples anddefi ne what a  pe rs onow ns an d  whathedoe s not.I gaveh imth e f ol lowing example: Th er e is  a vacan t plot su rr o unded by  s hop s in a n aff luen t  a rea of a  town. So me one has  i nforme dthe  po licea bout  hidde n excise  good s  buried there. The site is o v er g r ow n  wit h v egetation a fter therain f al l.T he po licest a rt to dig and they une ar th the  good s. They arres t Laxmicha n d who they  wer e  t o ld was the own er of  the land. Laxmicha nd te lls them  that hew a s no lon ger  th e o wne r an d that he had s oldth e landtwo  weeksago . W hen  th enew owner  is inte rr og at ed , h e pro t ests tobe ing  a ccu sed a n d tell s the  pol ic et hat  he had on l y  bou gh tthelan da for tnig h t a go, whi le the go ods must  h av e beenburied before  t he rainy s ea son  on ac c o unt of t he grass growing over i t . The p oli ce ho weve r are onl y c oncern eda bout t he pre sent- da y o w n ershi p of  th eland and a l t hou gh th enewowner p urchased it only f i fte en days ago,heis s t i ll  he l dr esp on s ibl e because he is t he owner n ow .  T he problem iswi th theownersh ip. I f  one we re to loo k at it a sit i s ,  it  was obvio us thatthe goods wereb ur ied b efo re the  r ain . Pas t owne r shi p has  no va lu e or r espon si bility.Current owner bears all  respo nsibi lit y.

"I am  Ch a ndu lal" is b eing  owner ofthe  bo dy co mpl e x and  hen c eres p onsib le f o r all its ac ts. "  I  am pure So u l "  is  theSta t e of t he G nani where is noo wnership at al l an d hen cen o li ab ility of viole nce  a t all.

Yo uwill only f ind a re so l ution  whenyou un derstan d ev e rythin g fr omsuch deta ile dp erspect iv e. How el se c an  thispuzzle be s o l ved?

"It is a p uzzle . The w o rld  is t he  puzzle itse lf. How ca n one solve  thispuzz le? T here ar etwo vi ewp oi nts to sol v ing thispuzzl e: One' re lati ve'  viewp oint , one'r eal'  v iew point."
I f  o n edo e s n ot
ized Gnani_has no_ownership of his body_and because_of_this he_is_not liable for_the body's actions._Secondly the Gnani does_not renounce nor_take_up anything. They did not understand the meaning of 'not having ownership of the_body',_so I_asked_them_why they thought that I_commit violence in such acts._One person_asked whether it would constitute violence if he_were_to crush an_insect under his foot. I told him that it_is violence because he believes that_it is his_foot_that_steps on the insect._I told him that I have_no ownership over this body and_hence there is no doer ship in_the act.

He wanted me to give_him examples and define what_a person_owns and what he does_not. I gave_him the_following example: There_is a vacant plot surrounded by_shops in an_affluent area of a town. Someone_has_informed the police_about_hidden_excise goods_buried there. The_site_is overgrown_with_vegetation after the rainfall. The police_start_to dig and they unearth the goods._They arrest Laxmichand who_they_were told was the_owner of the land. Laxmichand_tells them that he was no_longer the_owner and_that he had sold the land two weeks ago. When the_new owner is interrogated, he protests_to being accused and_tells the_police_that he had_only_bought the_land a fortnight ago, while the goods_must have_been buried before the rainy season_on account of the_grass_growing over it. The police however_are only concerned about the present-day_ownership of the land and_although_the_new owner purchased it only_fifteen days ago, he is still_held responsible because_he is the owner now. The problem_is_with the ownership. If one were_to_look at it as it is,_it_was_obvious that the goods were_buried before the rain. Past ownership_has no value or responsibility. Current owner bears all_responsibility.

"I am Chandulal"_is being owner of the_body_complex_and hence responsible for all its acts. " I am_pure Soul"_is the State_of the Gnani where is no ownership at all and_hence no liability of violence at all.

You_will only find a resolution when you understand everything from such_detailed perspective. How else can this puzzle be_solved?

"It is a puzzle. The world is_the puzzle itself. How_can_one solve this puzzle? There are two_viewpoints_to_solving_this puzzle: One'relative'_viewpoint, one'real' viewpoint."

If_one does not