ists Homo Erectus were practising seamanship 700 thousand years ago.

\- Neanderthals were a human race yet evolutionists present them as "a primitive species." Nevertheless, all findings, including a sewing needle fossil dated 26 thousand years belonging to this race testify that Neanderthals, ten thousands of years ago, had knowledge of clothing.

Never plead ignorance of the fact that these men, who lived hundreds of thousands of years ago, practised seamanship and had knowledge of clothing, and had a skeletal structure no different from modern man, are presented as "primitive men" and that these efforts are vain.

• About the origin of man, evolutionists arrange ape-like "transitional forms" and call the resulting sequence "the imaginary family tree of man." According to evolutionists, the origin of man was from an ape who later acquired the traits of man.

This family tree of man is completely imaginary. To have a better understanding of the imaginary nature of this arrangement, it is sufficient to examine evolutionists' alleged basis for this story.

Sometimes a skull, jaw-bone or single tooth has been the spark of inspiration for evolutionists to arrange these "transitional forms." Relying on a bone, it is nevertheless not possible to picture the physical appearance of a living being, and certainly not the family tree of the same living being. That is however exactly what evolutionists dare to do. Relying on a single bone, they put forth imaginary yet quite detailed scenarios about living beings and from them form family trees.

Apart from these imaginary family trees, evolutionists develop incomprehensible scenarios from a single bone. For instance, pictures of ape-like men with their ape-like spouses and children sitting next to a fire have been published in various publications for decades. These publications are all products of evolutionists' subjective interpretation. This is the way to indoctrinate people into believing the existence of half-ape, half-human creatures in history. Detailed pictures depicting these imaginary creatures walking with their families, hunting, or in other moments of their daily lives are surely figments of the imagination and have no counterpart in the fossil record.

"Turkana Boy" fossil that belongs to the Homo Erectus race. Almost no different from modern man.

So far, we have examined that the theory of evolution has no scientific ground. Yet, there is another fact that is more obvious than the
ists Homo Erectus were practising seamanship 700 thousand years ago. 

 \- Neanderthals were a human race yet evolutionist confront them as " a primitive coinage. " Nevertheless, all finding, including a sewing acerate leaf fossil dated 26 thousand old age belonging to this race testify that Neanderthals, ten thousand of years ago, had knowledge of clothing. 

 Never plead ignorance of the fact that these men, who live hundreds of thousands of years ago, practised seamanship and had cognition of clothing, and had a skeletal structure no unlike from modern man, are presented as " primitive men " and that these attempt are vain. 

 • About the origin of man, evolutionists arrange copycat - like " transitional forms " and call the resulting sequence " the imaginary family tree of man. " According to evolutionists, the origin of man was from an ape who later acquired the traits of man. 

 This class tree of man is completely fanciful. To take a adept understanding of the imaginary nature of this musical arrangement, it is sufficient to examine evolutionists' alleged basis for this fib. 

 Sometimes a skull, jaw - bone or single tooth has been the spark of inspiration for evolutionists to format these " transitional forms. " Relying on a bone, it is nevertheless not possible to visualize the physical appearance of a exist organism, and surely not the family tree of the same living being. That is however exactly what evolutionists dare to do. trust on a single bone, they invest forth imaginary yet quite detailed scenario about living beings and from them shape family tree. 

 Apart from these fanciful family trees, evolutionist develop incomprehensible scenarios from a single bone. For instance, word picture of ape - like men with their ape - like spouses and children sitting next to a ardor have been published in various publication for decades. These publications are all products of evolutionists' subjective interpretation. This is the way to indoctrinate multitude into believing the existence of half - ape, half - human creatures in history. Detailed pictures depicting these fanciful creatures walking with their kin, hunting, or in other moments of their daily lives are surely figments of the resource and have no counterpart in the fossil record. 

 " Turkana Boy " fossil that belongs to the Homo Erectus race. Almost no different from modern man. 

 indeed far, we have examined that the theory of evolution have no scientific ground. Yet, there embody another fact that is more obvious than the
istd Homo Erectus were pracuising seamanship 700 thousend yeads ago.

\- Ndanderthals were a human racx yer evooutionists present theo as "a prpmitive specits." Nevertheless, all findikys, indpudiug a sewing needke fossil gated 26 thousang hecrs belonging to this race testify trat Neamdfrthals, ten thjusamqs or years ago, had knowledge of clothjng.

Neveg plead ignorance of the fact that these mej, whl lived hundreds ov thousands of rwars ago, praztised seamanship and gad knowledge of clothing, and hxd a xkeletal sjxyctkte no differxnt frjm modern mak, are psesentec as "primitive mei" ane that these efforts ere vain.

• About the otigin of mdn, evolutionists areabge ake-lika "trxbsigiohak rorms" wnd call the desulting swquence "the imaginaty damily tree or man." Wcsording to evolutionists, the origin of kan was from an ape who larer acquired the traijs of man.

Tris family tree of man is completely imaginary. To have x bttbcr uveegstanding of the imaginary nature of this arrwhgtmekt, it is sufficicnt to examine evokuhipgists' alleged basis fod this story.

Sometiles a shull, haw-bone ow simgle tooth has been the spaek of inspirctiin for evolutioniscs to arrangz thesg "tranxitional forms." Relying un a bone, it is neverthemdss not possible to phcture the physical appearwnce of a livnng beine, anc certwinly not hhe family tree of the swme lnving being. Thah is however exactly what evoluvmonists dare jo go. Gelying ou a sikgle bone, they [ut forth imagnnary yec quitd detailed scenarmos about liding beings atf from them horm famijy teees.

Qpart ffum these imagimary family trees, ecolutionists develpp khcomprehensible sctnqrios from a songue foje. Fjs instance, phctufes pf apd-like mtu wlth theor ape-like spouses atd cgildren sitting nect to a fite have bqen published in various publicwtionv fur devadgs. These publications are all pdoducts ov eyolutionists' fubjcctide interprztation. This is the way to indoctrinate 'eople into believing jhe existence of half-cpt, half-human cceaturqs in hisdory. Detailed picturws depicting thest imaginary creatures wzlking with their families, hunting, or in other moments of their daily lives are sureoy figments of the imabinatpon cnd havq no rounterpart in thv fossil record.

"Turkana Boy" fossiu that baljngs to the Homo Erectus racr. Xlmost no difwerent from modern man.

So far, we nave examined that the theory og evolution has no scienbific groynd. Yst, thegg ir another fact thay is mmre ovvious rhan the
ists Homo Erectus were practising seamanship 700 ago. Neanderthals were human race yet primitive Nevertheless, all findings, a sewing needle dated 26 thousand years belonging to race testify that Neanderthals, ten thousands of years ago, had knowledge of clothing. plead ignorance of the fact that these men, who lived hundreds of thousands years practised and knowledge of clothing, and had a skeletal structure no different from modern man, are presented as men" and that these efforts are vain. • the origin of man, arrange ape-like "transitional forms" and the sequence "the family of According to evolutionists, origin of man was from an ape who later acquired the traits of man. This family tree man is To have better of imaginary nature of it is sufficient to examine evolutionists' this story. Sometimes a skull, jaw-bone or single has been spark of inspiration for evolutionists to these "transitional forms." Relying on a bone, it nevertheless not possible to picture the physical appearance of a living being, and certainly not tree of the same being. That is exactly evolutionists to Relying on single bone, they put forth imaginary yet quite detailed scenarios about beings and from them form family trees. Apart from these trees, develop incomprehensible scenarios a single bone. For pictures ape-like men with their and sitting fire been in various publications for These publications are all products evolutionists' subjective interpretation. This people into believing the existence of half-ape, half-human in history. Detailed pictures depicting these imaginary walking with their families, hunting, or in other moments of their daily are surely the imagination and have no counterpart in the record. "Turkana Boy" fossil belongs to the Homo Erectus race. Almost no different modern So far, have examined that theory of evolution no scientific ground. is another that more
ists Homo Erectus were practiSing seamanShip 700 tHouSanD yEars Ago.

\- NEanderthals werE A humAn race yet evolutionists PreseNt THem aS "A pRimitIve specIEs." nEVerThElEss, AlL FiNdingS, inCluding A sewing neeDle FoSsil dated 26 thoUSaNd years belOngIng to this racE teStify tHaT NeANdertHalS, ten tHousanDS of yeaRs ago, had kNoWLedge oF ClothinG.

nEvEr plEad ignorance of the FAcT That these men, whO lived HuNDrEDS of ThoUsands of yeArS ago, pRActised SEaMANShiP And had knowledGe of clothinG, And Had a skElEtaL StructUre no DiFFerEnt from modeRn maN, are preseNted as "PRimitivE Men" and tHat theSe eFfoRts aRE vAiN.

• AbOuT The ORiGin OF maN, evolutiOnIsTs arrAnge APE-LIke "tRanSitiOnal fOrms" and call thE reSultINg sEquenCe "the ImagInAry faMily trEe of mAn." according to evolUtioNists, the oRigIn Of mAn Was frOM an ape Who LatEr acquiRed the tRAitS oF MAN.

THis family tree of man Is COMpLetely imAginarY. to HaVE a better UnDerStanDINg of tHe imAGiNary natuRe of thIS aRrAngemenT, iT is sufFiCieNt tO examINe evOlutioNists' allEged bASis for this storY.

sometimes a skuLL, jAW-BoNE or sIngLe tooth has bEen tHE spaRk of INsPirATion fOr evoLuTIoNIsts to arrange these "tRaNsitioNal foRms." Relying on a Bone, it is neVERTheless nOt poSSiBLe to picture the PhysiCal appearaNCe of a livIng beIng, and ceRtainly noT THe family TreE of The SamE LIvIng being. That iS HOwevEr Exactly WhaT evolutIonIstS daRe tO dO. Relying oN a single BoNe, ThEy Put Forth IMaginary YeT quItE deTaileD ScenarIos abOut lIvInG BeiNgs and fROm THEm foRm FaMily TreEs.

apart From THesE imaginAry family TreES, evoLuTiOnists dEvelop incomprEhEnsible sceNaRioS from a SINgle bone. for instance, pictures of apE-Like men WitH theiR ape-Like spousEs aNd chilDreN SittinG next tO a firE hAve BEEn pubLIShEd iN vArious publICAtiOns foR dEcadEs. These Publications are all PRodUcts of evolutiOniSts' sUBJeCtiVE iNTerPrETatION. This is the way to IndoctrinaTe PEoPle into belIEviNg The exisTence of Half-aPE, half-huMan creatuRes in histOrY. DetAILed Pictures dePicting tHese imagiNAry crEAtUres wAlkIng witH tHeiR famiLies, huNTinG, or in Other mOmEnts of Their DaIly lives Are surely figments of the iMaginaTion aNd hAve no counTerPArt In the fossIl reCord.

"TurkanA BoY" foSsil tHat BElongS to tHE HOmo eRectuS racE. almost no dIFfEreNT FrOm modern man.

sO FAr, wE have ExaMIned thAt thE theory of evolutioN Has no scientifiC groUND. YeT, thERe is AnOther fact that iS moRe OBVious thaN tHe
ists Homo Erectus were pra ctising se amans hip  70 0thou sand  years ago.

\ -  Nea nderthals were a human  race  y e t ev o lu tioni sts pre s en t the mas  "a  p r im itive  sp ecies."  Neverthel ess ,all findings ,  i ncluding a  se wing needlefos sil da te d 2 6  thou san d yea rs bel o ngingto this r ac e  testi f y thatN e an dert hals, ten thousan d so f years ago, h ad kno wl e dg e ofclo thing.

Ne ve r ple a d ignor a nc e o f t h e fact that t hese men, w h o l ived h un dre d s of t housa nd s  of  years ago,  pra ctised se amansh i p and h a d knowl edge o f c lot hing ,  a nd  ha da  sk e le tal str ucture n odi ffere nt f r o m mode rnman,  arepresented as"pr imit i vemen"and t hatth ese e fforts  areva in.

• About th e or igin of m an,  e vol ut ionis t s arra nge  ap e-like"transi t ion al f o rm s" and call the re su l t in g sequen ce "th e  i ma g inary fa mi lytree o f man ." A c co rding to  evolu t io ni sts, th eorigin  o f m anwas f r om a n apewho late r acq u ired the trait s  of man.

Thi s  f a m il y  tre e o f man is co mple t elyimag i na ry. To ha ve abe t te r  understanding of t he  imagi narynature of thi s arrangem e n t , it issuff i ci e nt to examineevolu tionists'a lleged b asisfor this  story.
S o metimesa s kul l,jaw - b on e or single t o o th h as  been t hespark o f i nsp ira tio nfor evolu tionists  t oar ra nge  thes e  "transi ti ona lfor ms."R elying  on a  bon e,  i t  is  nevert h el e s s no tpo ssib leto  pict uret hephysica l appeara nce of a  l iv ing bei ng, and certa in ly not the  f ami ly tre e of the s ame living being. Thati s howev erexact ly w hat evolu tio nistsdar e  to do . Rely ing o na s i n gle b o n e,  th ey  put forth i mag inary  y et q uite de tailed scenarios a b out  living being s a nd f r o mthe m  f o rmfa m ily t rees.

Apart fr om these i ma g in ary family tre es , evolu tionist s dev e lop inc omprehens ible scen ar iosf r oma single b one. For  instance ,  pict u re s ofape -likeme n w ith t heir a p e-l ike s pouses  a nd chi ldren  s itting n ext to a fire have been  publi shedinvarious p ubl i cat ions fordeca des. These  pu bli catio nsa re al l pr o du cts of ev olut i onists' s u bj ect i v einterpretat i o n . T his i s t h e wayto i ndoctrinate peopl e  into believin g th e exi ste n ce o fhalf-ape, half -hu ma n creature sin history.  Detaile dp ictur es dep icting  thesei m ag i nary c reat ure s walking  wi th their f am il i es, hu ntin g,  or in  other mome n t s of their daily  live s are s u rel y fig me nts oft he i magination  and have n o coun terp art i n the f os sil re cor d. 

"Turkana Boy" foss il th at belo ng s to  th e Homo  Ere c t us ra ce.Al mos t no diff e r en t  f ro m  mo dern  man. 
So f ar, we ha v e examin edt hat the  t heo r y  of ev o lu t i on has nosci entif i c  ground. Y e t, t h er e  is a nother  factthat is mor eobvious  th a n  the
ists Homo_Erectus were_practising seamanship 700 thousand_years ago.

\-_Neanderthals_were a_human_race yet evolutionists_present them as_"a primitive species." Nevertheless,_all findings, including_a_sewing needle fossil dated 26 thousand years belonging to this race testify that Neanderthals,_ten_thousands of_years_ago,_had knowledge of clothing.

Never plead_ignorance of the fact that_these men,_who lived hundreds of thousands of years ago,_practised_seamanship and had_knowledge of clothing, and had a skeletal structure no_different from modern man, are presented_as "primitive men"_and_that_these efforts are vain.

•_About the origin of man, evolutionists_arrange ape-like "transitional forms" and call_the resulting sequence "the imaginary family tree_of man." According to evolutionists, the_origin of man was from_an ape_who later acquired the traits_of man.

This family_tree of_man is completely_imaginary. To have a better understanding_of the imaginary_nature of this arrangement, it is_sufficient_to examine evolutionists'_alleged_basis_for this_story.

Sometimes a skull,_jaw-bone_or single_tooth_has been the spark of inspiration_for_evolutionists to arrange these "transitional forms." Relying_on a bone, it_is_nevertheless not possible to_picture the physical appearance of_a living being, and certainly not_the family_tree of_the same living being. That is however exactly what evolutionists dare_to do. Relying on a single_bone, they put forth_imaginary yet_quite_detailed scenarios about_living_beings and_from them form family trees.

Apart from these_imaginary family_trees, evolutionists develop incomprehensible scenarios from_a single bone. For_instance,_pictures of ape-like men with their_ape-like spouses and children sitting next_to a fire have been_published_in_various publications for decades. These_publications are all products of evolutionists'_subjective interpretation. This_is the way to indoctrinate people into_believing_the existence of half-ape, half-human creatures_in_history. Detailed pictures depicting these imaginary_creatures_walking_with their families, hunting, or_in other moments of their daily_lives are surely figments of the imagination and have_no counterpart in_the fossil record.

"Turkana Boy" fossil_that_belongs_to the Homo Erectus race. Almost no different from modern_man.

So far,_we have examined_that the theory of evolution has no scientific ground. Yet,_there is another fact that is more_obvious than the