 Every Moment

Artadhyana (internal worries, meditation that hurts the self) and raudradhyana (thoughts or desire to hurt other people, anger-greed, meditation that hurts the self and others) is constantly occurring within human beings. These do not require any effort, they are happening, and because they cause self-violence, they are considered the greatest forms of violence in the world. Violence against insects and life forms is called effect-violence. Which is better?

**Questioner:** Neither violence is good, but self-violence is worse.

**Dadashri:** While all these people are cautious about material, effect-violence, self-violence is continually happening within. The scriptures say that self-violence is really intent-violence (bhaav himsa). After acquiring this Gnan, your intent-violence ceases. That is why you experience so much inner peace.

**Questioner:** Krupadudev (Srimad Rajchandra- Gnani Purush 1867-1901) has called intent-violence, 'intent-death' (death of the self), has he not? Krupadudev had asked "From moment to moment, why are you involved in such terrible intent-death?" Is there really intent death in every moment?

**Dadashri:** Yes, each and every moment there is dreadful intent-death happening. What is he trying to say? Actually, intent-death is taking place not from moment to moment, but continuously in the smallest unit of time. He has given a gross description of the frequency of intent-death, which in reality is occurring all the time. The belief 'I am Chandulal', is intent-death. In any situation, to believe that 'it is happening to me' **,** is intent-death. People are immersed in this belief all the time. They say and believe that they are the ones who are fasting and meditating or performing austerities.

**Questioner:** So instead of intent-death, how can we have intent-life?

**Dadashri:** Intent is not living; it is non-living. Intent-death is the same as intent-sleep (a state of unawareness of the eternal Self). In Akram Vignan there is no basis for intent-death, because intent (bhaav) has been separated from the Self. People
Every Moment 

 Artadhyana (internal worries, meditation that hurts the self) and raudradhyana (thoughts or desire to suffer early people, anger - avarice, meditation that hurts the self and others) is constantly occur within human beings. These do not necessitate any effort, they are happening, and because they induce self - ferocity, they are considered the greatest phase of violence in the world. Violence against insect and life forms is called effect - violence. Which is effective? 

 * * Questioner :* * Neither violence is good, but self - ferocity is worse. 

 * * Dadashri :* * While all these people are cautious about fabric, effect - ferocity, self - violence is continually happening within. The scriptures say that self - violence is really captive - violence (bhaav himsa). After acquiring this Gnan, your intent - violence ceases. That is why you experience therefore much inner peace. 

 * * Questioner :* * Krupadudev (Srimad Rajchandra- Gnani Purush 1867 - 1901) has called intent - violence,' intent - death' (death of the self), has he not? Krupadudev had asked " From here and now to moment, why are you involved in such frightful purpose - end? " Is there really intent death in every moment? 

 * * Dadashri :* * Yes, each and every moment there is dreadful intent - end happening. What is he trying to say? Actually, intent - death is taking place not from moment to moment, but continuously in the smallest unit of time. He has give a gross description of the frequency of purpose - end, which in world is occurring all the time. The belief' I am Chandulal', is intent - death. In any situation, to believe that' it is happening to me' * *, * * is purpose - death. multitude are immersed in this belief all the prison term. They say and think that they are the ones who are fasting and meditating or performing austerities. 

 * * Questioner :* * thus instead of purpose - death, how can we have purpose - life? 

 * * Dadashri :* * Intent is not living; it is non - living. Intent - end is the same as intent - sleep (a country of unawareness of the eternal Self). In Akram Vignan there is no basis for intent - end, because intent (bhaav) has been separated from the Self. citizenry
 Evfry Moment

Artadhyana (inttrnal worries, mednration that gurts thd self) and raudradhyana (thoujhts or dtfire to hurt other people, ajger-greee, mevitation that hucfs the self ahf otkecs) is constantli occurring fithin human baivgd. These do not require any effort, trey are hwppening, and bgcaust trey dause self-violence, they are considsred tht greatest forms og violence in the world. Villenfe against insects and life firms us called efwect-violenbz. Which is getter?

**Questioner:** Neither violenze is good, but weof-vlmlence is wirse.

**Dwdashri:** Whilc all tvese pepple are cautipus abiut material, effect-vimlence, self-violencg is contituclly happening within. Tye sctiptuses rqy ghau sxlf-biolenfe ms really ihtent-violenxe (bhaav himsa). Aftet wbauiring this Gnan, rotr intent-violence ceases. That is why yol exlerience so much inner peace.

**Questioner:** Krupafudev (Sriiad Rajchandra- Gnani Purush 1867-1901) has called intent-vionence, 'knttnb-qdqtj' (death of the self), has he not? Krupadudev had zslec "From moment bo moment, why are uok ogvolved in suzh terxjbme intent-death?" Is hhere rgally untent dewth on every moment?

**Dadashri:** Yes, each and evvry noment there is drzadful intenc-death happrning. What is he trying to aay? Actuallj, intent-dsxth is taking plxce nmt from moment to moment, btt continnouslv in the smaklest tnit of tile. He has given a gross fescrnptiot of the fgequency of intent-death, which ii reality is pcwurging all che tike. The belief 'I am Chandulak', is incent-dexth. In any situatmon, to beliede that 'it is jappening to me' **,** is yntebt-deqth. Peooue are immersec in this belief alo the time. They san and gelieve that thzv qre the ones whp afe sadtmng agg meditating or oerwprmine austeritics.

**Qjestooner:** So instead of hnteht-death, how can we hwve intebt-life?

**Daqashri:** Intent is not living; it ls noi-livinj. Intemt-dgath is the same as intent-sleep (a state lf mnawareness os thc etgrnal Self). Nn Akram Vignan there is no basis for invent-death, because intenr (bhaav) has been sekarsted from tie Sels. People
Every Moment Artadhyana (internal worries, meditation that self) raudradhyana (thoughts desire to hurt hurts self and others) constantly occurring within beings. These do not require any they are happening, and because they cause self-violence, they are considered the greatest of violence in the world. Violence against insects and life forms is called Which better? Neither is good, but self-violence is worse. **Dadashri:** While all these people are cautious about material, effect-violence, is continually happening within. The scriptures say that is really intent-violence (bhaav After acquiring this Gnan, your ceases. is why experience much peace. **Questioner:** Krupadudev Rajchandra- Gnani Purush 1867-1901) has called intent-violence, 'intent-death' (death of the self), has he not? Krupadudev had "From moment why are involved such intent-death?" Is there death in every moment? **Dadashri:** Yes, moment there is dreadful intent-death happening. What is trying to Actually, intent-death is taking place not moment to moment, but continuously in the smallest of time. He has given a gross description of the frequency of intent-death, which in occurring all the time. belief 'I am is In situation, believe that is happening to me' **,** is intent-death. People are immersed in belief all the time. They say and believe that they ones are fasting and or performing austerities. **Questioner:** instead intent-death, how can we **Dadashri:** is is Intent-death the same as intent-sleep state of unawareness of the Self). In Akram Vignan intent-death, because intent (bhaav) has been separated from Self. People
 Every Moment

Artadhyana (inteRnal worrieS, mediTatIon ThAt huRts tHe self) and raudrADhyaNa (thoughts or desire to huRt othEr PEoplE, AnGer-grEed, mediTAtION thAt HuRts ThE SeLf and OthErs) is coNstantly ocCurRiNg within humaN BeIngs. These dO noT require any eFfoRt, they ArE haPPeninG, anD becaUse theY Cause sElf-violenCe, THey are COnsiderED ThE greAtest forms of violeNCe IN the world. VioleNce agaInST iNSEctS anD life forms Is CalleD Effect-vIOlENCE. WhICh is better?

**QueStioner:** NeitHEr vIolencE iS goOD, but seLf-vioLeNCe iS worse.

**DadasHri:** WHile all thEse peoPLe are caUTious abOut matEriAl, eFfecT-ViOlEncE, sELf-vIOlEncE Is cOntinualLy HaPpeniNg wiTHIN. the sCriPturEs say That self-violeNce Is reALly IntenT-violEnce (BhAav hiMsa). AftEr acqUiRing this Gnan, youR intEnt-violenCe cEaSes. thAt is wHY you exPerIenCe so mucH inner pEAce.

**quESTIoNer:** Krupadudev (SrimaD RAJChAndra- GnaNi PuruSH 1867-1901) hAs CAlled intEnT-viOlenCE, 'IntenT-deaTH' (dEath of thE self), hAS hE nOt? KrupaDuDev had AsKed "froM momeNT to mOment, wHy are you InvolVEd in such terribLE intent-death?" IS ThERE rEAlly IntEnt death in eVery MOmenT?

**DadAShRi:** YES, each And evErY MoMEnt there is dreadful iNtEnt-deaTh hapPening. What is hE trying to sAY? aCtually, iNtenT-DeATh is taking placE not fRom moment tO Moment, buT contInuously In the smalLESt unit of TimE. He Has GivEN A gRoss descriptiON Of thE fRequencY of Intent-dEatH, whIch In rEaLity is occUrring alL tHe TiMe. the BelieF 'i am ChandUlAl', iS iNteNt-deaTH. In any SituaTion, To BeLIevE that 'it IS hAPPeniNg To Me' **,** is IntEnT-deatH. PeoPLe aRe immerSed in this BelIEf alL tHe Time. TheY say and believE tHat they are ThE onEs who aRE Fasting aNd meditating or performinG AusteriTieS.

**QuesTionEr:** So insteAd oF intenT-deATh, how cAn we haVe intEnT-liFE?

**dadasHRI:** INteNt Is not livinG; IT is Non-liViNg. InTent-deaTh is the same as intenT-SleEp (a state of unaWarEnesS OF tHe eTErNAl SElF). in AKRAm Vignan there is No basis for InTEnT-death, becaUSe iNtEnt (bhaaV) has beeN sepaRAted froM the Self. PEople
 Every Moment

Artadhyana(internalworri es,  me di tati on t hat hurts thes elf)  and raudradhyana (tho ughts  o r  des i re  to h urt oth e rp e opl e,  a nge r- g re ed, m edi tationthat hurts  th eself and oth e rs ) is const ant ly occurring  wi thin h um anb eings . T hesedo not requir e any eff or t , they are hap p e ni ng,and because theyc au s e self-violenc e, the ya re c ons ide red the gr ea testf orms of vi o l e nce in the world.  Violence a g ain st ins ec tsa nd lif e for ms iscalled effe ct-v iolence.Whichi s bette r ?

**Qu estion er: **Neit h er  v iol en c e i s  g ood ,  bu t self-v io le nce i s wo r s e . 

** Dad ashr i:**While all the sepeop l e a re ca utiou s ab ou t mat erial,  effe ct -violence, self -vio lence iscon ti nua ll y hap p eningwit hin . The s criptur e s s ay t h at  self-violence isre a l ly  intent- violen c e(b h aav hims a) . A fter a cquir ingt hi s Gnan,your i n te nt -violen ce  cease s.  Th atis wh y  you  exper ience so  much inner peace.
* *Questioner:* *  K r u pa d udev  (S rimad Rajch andr a - Gn aniP ur ush 1867- 1901)  h a sc alled intent-violen ce , 'int ent-d eath' (deathof the sel f ) ,  has henot? Kr u padudev had as ked " From momen t  to mome nt, w hy are y ou involv e d  in such  te rri ble  in t e nt -death?" Is t h e re r ea lly int ent  deathineve rymom en t?

**Dad ashri:**  Y es ,ea chand e v ery mome nt  th er e i s dre a dful i ntent -dea th  h a ppe ning. W h at i s he  t ry ingtosa y? Ac tual l y,intent- death istak i ng p la ce  not fr om moment tomo ment, butco nti nuousl y in the s mallest unit of time. H e  has gi ven  a gr ossdescripti onof the  fr e quency  of in tent- de ath , which i nrea li ty is occu r r ing  allth e ti me. The  belief 'I am Chan d ula l', is intent -de ath. I nany si t uat io n , t o believe that 'i t is happe ni n gto me' **, * * i sintent- death.Peopl e  are im mersed in  this bel ie f al l the  time. The y say an d believe thatt he y are  th e ones  w hoare f asting and  medi tating  o r perf ormin gausterit ies.

**Questioner:** S o inst ead o f i ntent-dea th, how  can we h aveintent-lif e?
** Dadas hri : ** In tent is  no t  livi ng;i t is non- l iv ing . In tent-deathi s the  same  as intent -sle ep (a state of un a wareness of th e et e r nal  Se l f).In  Akram Vignanthe re i s no bas is  for intent -death,be c auseintent  (bhaa v) hasb e en separa tedfro m the Sel f.Pe o ple
 Every_Moment

Artadhyana (internal_worries, meditation that hurts_the self)_and_raudradhyana (thoughts_or_desire to hurt_other people, anger-greed,_meditation that hurts the_self and others)_is_constantly occurring within human beings. These do not require any effort, they are happening,_and_because they_cause_self-violence,_they are considered the greatest_forms of violence in the_world. Violence_against insects and life forms is called effect-violence._Which_is better?

**Questioner:** Neither_violence is good, but self-violence is worse.

**Dadashri:** While all_these people are cautious about material,_effect-violence, self-violence is_continually_happening_within. The scriptures say_that self-violence is really intent-violence (bhaav_himsa). After acquiring this Gnan, your_intent-violence ceases. That is why you experience_so much inner peace.

**Questioner:** Krupadudev (Srimad_Rajchandra- Gnani Purush 1867-1901) has_called intent-violence,_'intent-death' (death of the self),_has he not?_Krupadudev had_asked "From moment_to moment, why are you involved_in such terrible_intent-death?" Is there really intent death_in_every moment?

**Dadashri:** Yes,_each_and_every moment_there is dreadful_intent-death_happening. What_is_he trying to say? Actually, intent-death_is_taking place not from moment to moment,_but continuously in the_smallest_unit of time. He_has given a gross description_of the frequency of intent-death, which_in reality_is occurring_all the time. The belief 'I am Chandulal', is intent-death. In_any situation, to believe that 'it_is happening to me'_**,** is_intent-death._People are immersed_in_this belief_all the time. They say and believe_that they_are the ones who are fasting_and meditating or performing_austerities.

**Questioner:**_So instead of intent-death, how can_we have intent-life?

**Dadashri:** Intent is not_living; it is non-living. Intent-death_is_the_same as intent-sleep (a state_of unawareness of the eternal Self)._In Akram Vignan_there is no basis for intent-death, because_intent_(bhaav) has been separated from the_Self._People