 infinite number of free shots at their victims with perjured, slanderous TRO petitions that they fraudulently fi le in Family Court as domestic abuse cases. They pay no price whatsoever when their allegations are proved to be lies, so they do it again and again with different sets of lies and against different victims.

Bad cops also benefit from perjury decriminalization. They can swear to lies with impunity, and they do so for many reasons including: to extort crime perpetrators and crime victims; to exact revenge; and to justify an arrest or an assault. It is self-evident that the perjury decriminalization policy encourages perjury and that perjury harms its victims and harms the integrity of the justice system.

Despite many complaints over several decades, Maui County has firmly maintained the policy while also cynically and firmly denying it maintains the policy, proving beyond dispute that it is a lawless and criminal entity. For its own perverted reasons the legal profession will not challenge the policy.

Victims of perjured TRO petitions who are exonerated and can prove perjury, nevertheless cannot sue the culprit for legal costs, libel, and other injuries, even in Small Claims Court, because the state courts have ruled that there must first be a conviction on a perjury charge before a court can hear such a complaint. They have so ruled even knowing that such a conviction is impossible to obtain because of the County's perjury decriminalization policy. It is self-evident that this is an intolerable violation of the rights of victims of felony perjury under the Hawai'i State Constitution.

A corollary of the decriminalization of perjury is the decriminalization of subornation of perjury. This benefits prosecutors more than anyone else. With this tool they can select and mould the testimony they need to railroad their victims without fear of legal risk to themselves. They, rather than the law and the courts, decide who is a criminal and who is a victim, and they often get it backwards. They build their careers on the shattered lives of perjury victims, and they corrupt the system to such an extent that anarchy would be preferable.

Refusal to investigate violates due process. Police refusal to investigate often goes beyond perjury complaints. It can include any type of complaint by anyone, and it can be for any reason or no reason. They not only cannot be compelled to investigate; they cannot be compelled to explain why they
infinite number of free shots at their victim with perjure, slanderous TRO petitions that they fraudulently fi le in Family Court as domestic maltreatment event. They pay no price whatsoever when their allegation are rise to be lie, so they do it again and again with different set of lies and against different victim. 

 Bad bull also benefit from perjury decriminalization. They can trust to lies with impunity, and they do thus for many reasons including: to extort crime perpetrators and crime victim; to exact revenge; and to justify an arrest or an rape. It is self - evident that the perjury decriminalization policy encourage perjury and that perjury harms its victims and harms the integrity of the department of justice system. 

 Despite many complaints over several decades, Maui County has firmly keep the policy while also cynically and firmly denying it maintains the policy, proving beyond dispute that it is a lawless and criminal entity. For its own perverted reasons the legal profession will not challenge the policy. 

 Victims of perjure TRO request who are exonerated and can raise perjury, however cannot action the culprit for legal costs, libel, and other injuries, even in Small Claims Court, because the state courts have ruled that there must first be a conviction on a perjury accusation before a court can hear such a complaint. They have so ruled even know that such a conviction is impossible to obtain because of the County's perjury decriminalization policy. It is self - evident that this is an intolerable violation of the rights of victims of felony perjury under the Hawai'i State Constitution. 

 A corollary of the decriminalization of perjury is the decriminalization of subornation of perjury. This benefits prosecutor more than anyone else. With this cock they can select and mould the testimony they need to railroad their victim without fear of legal risk to themselves. They, rather than the jurisprudence and the courts, decide who is a criminal and who is a victim, and they often get it backwards. They build up their careers on the shattered lives of perjury victim, and they corrupt the arrangement to such an extent that anarchy would be preferable. 

 Refusal to investigate violates due procedure. Police refusal to investigate often proceed beyond perjury complaints. It can include any type of complaint by anyone, and it can be for any reason or no cause. They not only cannot be compelled to investigate; they cannot be compelled to explain why they
 invinite number of free shuts at their vierims wmth pernured, slxnderous TRO petitions that vhey fraueulently fi le in Famiuy Court ws domesric ebuse cases. They pay no ixice smatsozvxr when their aklegations are proved to bd pies, so they do it again and again rith digffrent sets of jies wnd zgainst different victims.

Bad cops zlso beiefit from perjiry decriminalization. They can swear to lies witj impunity, qnd eyey do so fof many reasons includihg: to extort crime perpetrators and erime victins; to gxact revengx; and no justify an arrest mr an axsault. It is sclf-evmdenr that the perjury derriminalization polisy encourdgzs perjury and that pwrhury varmv itr viztijs ahd harls vhe integrify of the jystice system.

Despitt mwby complaints over federal decades, Maui County has firmly mapntajned the policy while aoso cynically and firlly denyigg it maintains the policy, proving beyond dispute that kt nw a lxqlfss and criminal entity. For its own perverted desspns the legal irofession will noy fhsjlenge the pouicy.

Viefijs of perjured TRO petitijns wyo are exjnersted and can prove perjury, bevertheless xannot sue the cul'rit for legcl cosjs, librl, and other injuries, eren in Small Clails Court, gdcause the state colrts have ruled that there muse first bx a cpnvictiun om a pewjury charhe benmre a court can hewr sueh a womplaint. Hhey have so ruled even knowing that such a cpneicnion is iiposslble to obtain fecause of the County'f pergury decrijinalizetion policy. It is self-evhfent that thms is an yntooeravle viouxtion of the roghts of nietims of delony perjury undcr thg Gawai'i State Couruirution.

A corollsry of tje dqwriminalizathon uf orrjurh is tht dccrkminslization of subornadion of perjury. This brncfits prowecutors more than anuone else. With thid toon tiey cam sglect and mould the testimony tgey need ho vailroad theiw vigtimf without year of legal risk to themselves. They, ravher than the law and jhe courts, decide who ls a criminak and who is a victim, and they oftwn get it backwarcs. They build their czreers on tje shattered lives of perjury victims, and they corrupt the system to such an exvegt that anadchy woulg ye 'referafle.

Rxfnsal to investigane violates due process. Police rxfusal to hnrestigate often goes beyond prrgury complainjs. It can include any type of compkaint by anyone, and it can be fpr any reason or no reaspn. They bot ohly cannot be compelled to imvestiyate; tyey canbot ne compelled tu ecppain why hhey
infinite number of free shots at their perjured, TRO petitions they fraudulently fi domestic cases. They pay price whatsoever when allegations are proved to be lies, they do it again and again with different sets of lies and against victims. Bad cops also benefit from perjury decriminalization. They can swear to lies impunity, they so many reasons including: to extort crime perpetrators and crime victims; to exact revenge; and to justify arrest or an assault. It is self-evident that perjury decriminalization policy encourages and that perjury harms its and the integrity the system. many complaints over decades, Maui County has firmly maintained the policy while also cynically and firmly denying it maintains the proving beyond it is lawless criminal For its own the legal profession will not challenge of perjured TRO petitions who are exonerated and prove perjury, cannot sue the culprit for legal libel, and other injuries, even in Small Claims because the state courts have ruled that there must first be a conviction on a before a court can such a complaint. have ruled knowing such a is impossible to obtain because of the County's perjury decriminalization policy. is self-evident that this is an intolerable violation of the victims felony perjury under Hawai'i State Constitution. A of decriminalization of perjury is of of prosecutors than else. With this tool can select and mould the they need to railroad legal risk to themselves. They, rather than the and the courts, decide who is a and who is a victim, and they often get it backwards. They their careers shattered lives of perjury victims, and they corrupt system to such an that anarchy would be preferable. Refusal to investigate violates process. refusal to often goes beyond complaints. It can any type of anyone, and can for no reason. They not only cannot compelled investigate; they cannot be compelled explain
 infinite number of free shots At their vicTims wIth PerJuRed, sLandErous TRO petitiONs thAt they fraudulently fi le In FamIlY courT As DomesTic abusE CaSES. ThEy PaY no PrICe WhatsOevEr when tHeir allegaTioNs Are proved to bE LiEs, so they do It aGain and again WitH diffeReNt sETs of lIes And agAinst dIFferenT victims.

BAd COps alsO Benefit FROm PerjUry decriminalizatIOn. tHey can swear to lIes witH iMPuNITy, aNd tHey do so for MaNy reaSOns inclUDiNG: TO exTOrt crime perpeTrators and cRIme VictimS; tO exACt reveNge; anD tO JusTify an arresT or aN assault. IT is selF-Evident THat the pErjury DecRimInalIZaTiOn pOlICy eNCoUraGEs pErjury anD tHaT perjUry hARMS Its vIctIms aNd harMs the integritY of The jUStiCe sysTem.

DeSpitE mAny coMplainTs oveR sEveral decades, MaUi CoUnty has fiRmlY mAinTaIned tHE policY whIle Also cynIcally aND fiRmLY DEnYing it maintains the PoLICy, Proving bEyond dISpUtE That it is A lAwlEss aND CrimiNal eNTiTy. For its Own perVErTeD reasonS tHe legaL pRofEssIon wiLL not ChalleNge the poLicy.

VICtims of perjureD tRO petitions wHO aRE ExONeraTed And can prove PerjURy, neVertHElEss CAnnot Sue thE cULpRIt for legal costs, libeL, aNd otheR injuRies, even in SmaLl Claims CoURT, Because tHe stATe COurts have ruled That tHere must fiRSt be a conVictiOn on a perJury chargE BEfore a coUrt Can HeaR suCH A cOmplaint. They hAVE so rUlEd even kNowIng that SucH a cOnvIctIoN is impossIble to obTaIn BeCaUse Of the cOunty's peRjUry DeCriMinalIZation PolicY. It iS sElF-EviDent thaT ThIS Is an InToLeraBle ViOlatiOn of THe rIghts of Victims of FelONy peRjUrY under tHe Hawai'i State coNstitution.

a cOroLlary oF THe decrimInalization of perjury is tHE decrimInaLizatIon oF subornatIon Of perjUry. tHis benEfits pRosecUtOrs MORe thaN ANyOne ElSe. With this TOOl tHey caN sElecT and mouLd the testimony they NEed To railroad theIr vIctiMS WiThoUT fEAr oF lEGal RISk to themselves. THey, rather tHaN ThE law and the COurTs, Decide wHo is a crIminaL And who iS a victim, aNd they oftEn Get iT BAckWards. They bUild theiR careers oN The shATtEred lIveS of perJuRy vIctimS, and thEY coRrupt The sysTeM to sucH an exTeNt that anArchy would be preferable.

REfusal To invEstIgate violAteS Due Process. PoLice Refusal to iNveStiGate oFteN Goes bEyonD PeRjuRY compLainTS. It can incLUdE anY TYpE of complainT BY AnyOne, anD it CAn be foR any Reason or no reason. THEy not only cannoT be cOMPelLed TO invEsTigate; they cannOt bE cOMPelled to ExPlain why theY
 infinite number of free s hots at th eir v ict ims  w ithperj ured, slandero u s TR O petitions that theyfraud ul e ntly fi  le i n Famil y  C o u rtas  d ome st i cabuse  ca ses. Th ey pay nopri ce  whatsoeverw he n their al leg ations are p rov ed tobe  li e s, so  th ey do  it ag a in and  again wi th differ e nt sets o flies  and against diff e re n t victims.

Ba d cops  a l so b ene fit  from perj ur y dec r iminali z at i o n . T h ey can swearto lies wit h  im punity ,and they d o sofo r  ma ny reasonsincl uding: to  extor t  crimep erpetra tors a ndcri me v i ct im s;to exa c trev e nge ; and to  j us tifyan a r r e s t or  an  ass ault.  It is self-e vid entt hat  theperju ry d ec rimin alizat ion p ol icy encouragesperj ury and t hat  p erj ur y har m s itsvic tim s and h arms th e  in te g r i ty  of the justice sy st e m .
Despite  manyc om pl a ints ove rsev eral d ecade s, M a ui  Countyhas fi r ml ymaintai ne d thepo lic y w hilea lsocynica lly andfirml y  denying it ma i ntains the po l ic y ,  p r ovin g b eyond dispu te t h at i t is alaw l ess a nd cr im i na l  entity. For its ow nperver ted r easons the le gal profes s i o n will n ot c h al l enge the polic y.

V ictims ofp erjuredTRO p etitions  who aree x onerated  an d c anpro v e  p erjury, never t h eles scannotsue  the cu lpr itfor  le ga l costs,libel, a nd  o th er  in jurie s , even i nSma ll  Cl aimsC ourt,becau se t he  s t ate  courts ha v e  rul ed  t hatthe re  must  fir s t b e a con viction o n a perj ur ychargebefore a cour tcan hear s uc h a  compl a i nt. They  have so ruled even kno w ing tha t s uch a  con viction i s i mpossi ble to obt ain be cause  o f t h e  Coun t y 's  pe rj ury decrim i n ali zatio npoli cy. Itis self-evident th a t t his is an int ole rabl e vi ola t io n  of  t h e r i g hts of victimsof felonype r ju ry under t h e H aw ai'i St ate Con stitu t ion.

A  corollar y of thede crim i n ali zation ofperjuryis the de c rimin a li zatio n o f subo rn ati on of  perju r y.Thisbenefi ts  prose cutor smore tha n anyone else. With thi s tool  they  ca n selectand mou ld the te stim ony they n eed  to  rail roa d  thei r vi c ti msw ithou t fe a r of lega l  r isk t othemselves. T h ey,  rath ert han th e la w and the courts, decide who isa cr i m ina l a n d wh ois a victim, a ndth e y  often g et  it backwar ds. They  b u ild t heir c areers  on the s ha t teredlive s o f perjury  vi ct i ms, and  t he y  corru pt t he  syste m to s u ch a n extent that anar chy w o u ld be pre ferab le .

Refu s al t o investig ate violate s dueproc ess.Policere fusaltoin vestigateo ften goes  beyo nd perj ur y co mpl aints.  Itc a n inc lude  a nytype of c o m pl a in tb y a nyon e, an dit c an be for any reas ono r no re as on. T hey no t  o n l y cannot b e c ompel l e d to inves t igat e ;t hey c annotbe com pelledt o e xp lain wh y t h e y
 infinite_number of_free shots at their_victims with_perjured,_slanderous TRO_petitions_that they fraudulently_fi le in_Family Court as domestic_abuse cases. They_pay_no price whatsoever when their allegations are proved to be lies, so they do_it_again and_again_with_different sets of lies and_against different victims.

Bad cops also_benefit from_perjury decriminalization. They can swear to lies with_impunity,_and they do_so for many reasons including: to extort crime perpetrators_and crime victims; to exact revenge;_and to justify_an_arrest_or an assault. It_is self-evident that the perjury decriminalization_policy encourages perjury and that perjury_harms its victims and harms the integrity_of the justice system.

Despite many complaints_over several decades, Maui County_has firmly_maintained the policy while also_cynically and firmly_denying it_maintains the policy,_proving beyond dispute that it is_a lawless and_criminal entity. For its own perverted_reasons_the legal profession_will_not_challenge the_policy.

Victims of perjured_TRO_petitions who_are_exonerated and can prove perjury, nevertheless_cannot_sue the culprit for legal costs, libel,_and other injuries, even_in_Small Claims Court, because_the state courts have ruled_that there must first be a_conviction on_a perjury_charge before a court can hear such a complaint. They have_so ruled even knowing that such_a conviction is impossible_to obtain_because_of the County's_perjury_decriminalization policy._It is self-evident that this is an_intolerable violation_of the rights of victims of_felony perjury under the_Hawai'i_State Constitution.

A corollary of the decriminalization_of perjury is the decriminalization of_subornation of perjury. This benefits_prosecutors_more_than anyone else. With this_tool they can select and mould_the testimony they_need to railroad their victims without fear_of_legal risk to themselves. They, rather_than_the law and the courts, decide_who_is_a criminal and who is_a victim, and they often get_it backwards. They build their careers on the shattered_lives of perjury_victims, and they corrupt the_system_to_such an extent that anarchy would be preferable.

Refusal to investigate_violates due_process. Police refusal_to investigate often goes beyond perjury complaints. It can include_any type of complaint by anyone, and_it can be for any reason or no reason. They not_only cannot be compelled to investigate; they cannot_be compelled to explain why they