

Cover page

Preface of English edition

Preface of Greek edition

Abstract

1.Introduction

2.How to be read

2α. Reasoning schemas

2β. Functional vs substantial role of N. Korea

2γ. Concluding procedure

2δ. Approaching conclusions

3. Theoretical framework

4. What has and has not been discussed

5. N. Korea's case

5α. In advanced given

5β. Drivers of China's policies

5γ. Uncertainty and energy trade

5δ. Cross-checking rational reasoning

6. Turkey's case

6α. Side by side study and parallelisms

6β. Big picture

6γ. Shortly illustrating EU policies' momentum

6δ. Under Morgenthau's prism

7. Constraints and limitations

8. Conclusions

Bibliography

Greek

English

Back cover

# Introduction

And Poesy is always one like one is the sky.  
What matters is from where anyone stares the sky.  
I have stared the sky right through the sea.  
(Odysseas Elytis, The Little Nautilus)

This study – shortly bearing the title of "Nuclear: Turkey like N. Korea?" – is a novel approach to nuclear weapons, that introduces the missing link between them and both energy and climate policies.

In particular, the kind of policies that are being associated with controlling and limiting fossil fuel's utilization, gas emissions and harmful air pollutants. Namely, those of energy efficiency and climate change mitigation policies.

We have all attained debates around the environmental impact of fossil fuels, their contribution to countries' trade balance, or even on global warming controversy and whether climate change is indeed occurring.

During this study, will be illustrated that even if climate change is milder than the estimated one, nevertheless its policies' effect is undeniable, while resulting impacts can be non-transparent and invisible connected; not only observable. Moreover, the aforementioned impacts can be enhanced by the effect of a combined action with energy efficiency policies. This combined effect still lies under the same non-observed impacting status; that generally can be described as unanticipated and undesirable consequences.

Consequences like, promoting seek and pursuit of technological knowhow acquisition on nuclear weapons at least or/
Cover page 

 Preface of English edition 

 Preface of Greek edition 

 Abstract 

 1.Introduction 

 2.How to be read 

 2α. Reasoning schema 

 2β. running vs substantial role of N. Korea 

 2γ. conclude routine 

 2δ. Approaching conclusions 

 3. Theoretical model 

 4. What has and has not been discussed 

 5. N. Korea's case 

 5α. In advance give 

 5β. Drivers of China's policy 

 5γ. Uncertainty and energy trade wind 

 5δ. Cross - checking rational reasoning 

 6. Turkey's case 

 6α. Side by side survey and parallelisms 

 6β. Big picture 

 6γ. concisely illustrating EU policies' momentum 

 6δ. Under Morgenthau's prism 

 7. Constraints and restriction 

 8. Conclusions 

 Bibliography 

 Greek 

 English 

 Back cover 

 # Introduction 

 And Poesy is always one like one is the sky.  
 What matters is from where anyone stare the sky.  
 I have stared the sky right through the sea.  
 (Odysseas Elytis, The Little Nautilus) 

 This study – shortly hold the title of " Nuclear: Turkey like N. Korea? " – is a novel approach to nuclear weapons, that introduces the missing link between them and both energy and climate policies. 

 In particular, the kind of policy that are being associated with controlling and specify fossil fuel's utilization, gas emissions and harmful tune pollutants. Namely, those of energy efficiency and climate change mitigation policy. 

 We have all attained debates around the environmental impact of fossil fuels, their contribution to countries' craft balance, or even on global warming controversy and whether climate change is indeed occur. 

 During this study, will be exemplify that even if climate change is milder than the estimated one, nevertheless its policies' consequence is undeniable, while resulting impacts can be non - transparent and inconspicuous connected; not entirely observable. Moreover, the aforementioned shock can be enhanced by the impression of a combined action with department of energy efficiency policies. This combined effect still lie under the same non - ascertained impacting status; that generally can be described as unanticipated and undesirable consequence. 

 consequence like, promote seek and pursuit of technological knowhow acquisition on nuclear weapons at least or/


Covfr page

Preface of Englism edition

Preface of Grexk editjon

Abstrxct

1.Introduction

2.How to be reav

2α. Reqsonibg schemas

2β. Functional xs substajtial rooe oh N. Korea

2γ. Concluvjng progzdure

2δ. Wpprmeching conclusipns

3. Theoredical frameworn

4. Dhct has and has not been discussed

5. N. Horea's vade

5α. In advanced givtn

5β. Qrivsgs of China's policies

5γ. Uncertainfy and tnergy trade

5δ. Cross-vhecking rational reasoninh

6. Tugkey's case

6α. Side by side study and parallelisms

6β. Big pictugz

6γ. Shortly imlustrating EU policies' momentuo

6δ. Undzr Morgenthqu'w pghsm

7. Constramnts agd limitatiokx

8. Concnusions

Nibliography

Grcek

Enjlisy

Back cover

# Introductmon

And Poesy is alwais one lika kne is the sky.  
Wyar matjers hs ffim dhede ahyone dtaces the sky.  
I have stqred the sky right uhrjlbh the sea.  
(Kdyssews Elytis, The Little Nautilus)

This study – vhodtly bearing the title if "Nuclear: Turkey likg N. Korea?" – is a novel approach to nuclear weapons, that intrmducea tht nissivt pink between them and both energy and climate lokibies.

In particular, the kind og ookycies that arg being asaociated with contgolling and oimiting sossol fuel's utilization, gas emussions and karnful air pollutantd. Namely, thuse pf enrrgy efficiency and clioate change mitlgation pkuicies.

We have alu antaited debauds around the envyronmentao im'act of wossol fuejs, their clntringtion to countries' tradg balatce, or evej on global warming controversy and whether ckikatv change ns indced occurring.

Duwing this studi, will be illurtrated thzt even if climate change is minfer than the estimatqd obe, nwvertheudss its policirs' effect is undeniqble, while resultikg imkadts can be non-txcnwparent and invosicle clniecteq; not only obvervxbld. Moreuver, tht anordmenyioned impacts can ba enganced by the effevt of a conbined astion with enrrgy efficiency popiciev. Tiis cokbiged effect still lies under ths same noj-obferved impaceing status; that generally can be described as unantici'ated and undesirable cinsequences.

Consequeucts like, promoving sqek and pgrsuit of technologixal knowhow acquixition on nuclear wealons ad leadt or/
Cover page Preface of English edition Preface edition 1.Introduction 2.How be read 2α. substantial of N. Korea Concluding procedure 2δ. conclusions 3. Theoretical framework 4. What and has not been discussed 5. N. Korea's case 5α. In advanced given Drivers of China's policies 5γ. Uncertainty and energy trade 5δ. Cross-checking rational reasoning Turkey's 6α. by study and parallelisms 6β. Big picture 6γ. Shortly illustrating EU policies' momentum 6δ. Under Morgenthau's prism Constraints and limitations 8. Conclusions Bibliography Greek English cover # Introduction And is always one like one the What matters from anyone the sky. I stared the sky right through the sea. (Odysseas Elytis, The Little Nautilus) This study – shortly bearing title of like N. – a approach to nuclear introduces the missing link between them and climate policies. In particular, the kind of that are associated with controlling and limiting fossil utilization, gas emissions and harmful air pollutants. Namely, of energy efficiency and climate change mitigation policies. We have all attained debates around the of fossil fuels, their to countries' trade or on warming and whether change is indeed occurring. During this study, will be illustrated that if climate change is milder than the estimated one, nevertheless effect undeniable, while resulting can be non-transparent and connected; only observable. Moreover, the can enhanced of combined with energy efficiency policies. combined effect still lies under same non-observed impacting status; as unanticipated and undesirable consequences. Consequences like, promoting and pursuit of technological knowhow acquisition on weapons at least or/


Cover page

Preface of English Edition

PreFace oF GrEek EdItioN

AbsTract

1.IntroductIOn

2.HoW to be read

2α. Reasoning schEmas

2β. fuNCtioNAl Vs subStantiaL RoLE Of N. koReA

2γ. COnCLuDing pRocEdure

2δ. APproaching ConClUsions

3. TheoreTIcAl frameworK

4. WhAt has and has nOt bEen disCuSseD

5. n. KoreA's cAse

5α. IN advanCEd giveN

5β. Drivers Of cHina's pOLicies

5γ. uNCeRtaiNty and energy trade

5Δ. crOSs-checking ratiOnal reAsONiNG

6. turKey'S case

6α. Side By Side sTUdy and pARaLLELisMS

6β. Big picture

6γ. shortly illuSTraTing EU PoLicIEs' momeNtum

6δ. unDEr MOrgenthau's pRism

7. constrainTs and lIMitatioNS

8. ConcluSions

BIblIogRaphY

grEeK

EnGlISh

BACk CovER

# InTroductiOn

anD PoesY is aLWAYS one LikE one Is the Sky.  
What matterS is From WHerE anyoNe staRes tHe Sky.  
I hAve staRed thE sKy right through tHe seA.  
(Odysseas elyTiS, ThE LIttle nAutiluS)

ThIs sTudy – shoRtly beaRIng ThE TITlE of "Nuclear: Turkey liKe n. kOrEa?" – is a novEl apprOAcH tO Nuclear wEaPonS, thaT INtrodUces THe Missing lInk betWEeN tHem and bOtH energY aNd cLimAte poLIcieS.

In parTicular, tHe kinD Of policies that ARe being associATeD WItH ContRolLing and limiTing FOssiL fueL'S uTilIZatioN, gas eMiSSiONs and harmful air pollUtAnts. NaMely, tHose of energy eFficiency aND CLimate chAnge MItIGation policies.

we havE all attainED debates ArounD the enviRonmental IMPact of foSsiL fuEls, TheIR CoNtribution to cOUNtriEs' Trade baLanCe, or eveN on GloBal WarMiNg controvErsy and wHeThEr ClImaTe chaNGe is indeEd OccUrRinG.

DuriNG this sTudy, wIll bE iLlUStrAted thaT EvEN If clImAtE chaNge Is MildeR thaN The EstimatEd one, neveRthELess ItS pOlicies' Effect is undenIaBle, while reSuLtiNg impaCTS can be noN-transparent and invisiblE ConnectEd; nOt onlY obsErvable. MoReoVer, the AfoREmentiOned imPacts CaN be ENHanceD BY tHe eFfEct of a combINEd aCtion WiTh enErgy effIciency policies. ThiS ComBined effect stIll Lies UNDeR thE SaME noN-oBSerVED impacting statuS; that generAlLY cAn be descriBEd aS uNanticiPated anD undeSIrable cOnsequencEs.

ConsequEnCes lIKE, prOmoting seeK and pursUit of techNOlogiCAl KnowhOw aCquisiTiOn oN nuclEar weaPOns At leaSt or/


Cover page

Preface of E nglish edi tion
Pr efa ce  ofGree k edition

Abs t ract 

1.Introduction

2.Ho w tobe read 
2 α. Re asoning sc h e mas 
2β . F un c ti onalvssubstan tial roleofN.  Korea

2γ.C on cluding pr oce dure

2δ. Ap pro aching  c onc l usion s
3. Th eoreti c al fra mework

4 .W hat ha s  and ha s no t be en discussed

5.N .K orea's case

5 α. Inad v an c e d g ive n

5β. Dri ve rs of China's po l i c ies 
5γ. Uncertai nty and ene r gytrade
5 δ.C ross-c hecki ng rat ional reaso ning 

6. Turk ey's c a se

6α. Side by  sidestu dyandp ar al lel is m s
6 β.  Bi g  pi cture

6 γ.  S hortl y il l u s t rati ngEU p olici es' momentum
6δ . Un d erMorge nthau 's p ri sm

7 . Cons train ts  and limitation s

8 . Conclus ion s
Bi bl iogra p hy

Gr eek 

E nglish
Back c o ver 
# I nt roduction

And Poe sy i salways o ne lik e  o ne is the s ky . 
Wha t matte rs i s  f rom wher e anyo n est ares th esky. 
I  ha vestare d  the  sky r ight thr ought he sea.  
(Ody s seas Elytis,T he L it t le N aut ilus)

This  stu d y –shor t ly  be a ringthe t it l eo f "Nuclear: Turkeyli ke N.Korea ?" – is a nov el approac h t o nuclea r we a po n s, that introd ucesthe missin g  link be tween  them an d both en e r gy and c lim ate  po lic i e s. 

In particul a r , th ekind of  po liciestha t a rebei ng  associat ed withco nt ro ll ing  andl imitingfo ssi lfue l's u t ilizat ion,gasem is s ion s and h a rm f u l ai rpo llut ant s.  Name ly,t hos e of en ergy effi cie n cy a nd  c limatechange mitiga ti on policie s. 

W e have a ll attai ned debates around thee nvironm ent al im pact  of fossi l f uels,the i r cont ributi on to  c oun t r ies't r ad e b al ance, or e v e n o n glo ba l wa rming c ontroversy and whe t her  climate chan geis i n d ee d o c cu r rin g. 
Du r i ng this study,will be il lu s tr ated thate ven  i f clima te chan ge is milderthan theestimated  o ne,n e ver theless it s polici es' effec t  is u n de niabl e,whilere sul tingimpact s  ca n benon-tr an sparen t and  i nvisible  connected; not only ob servab le. M ore over, the  af o rem entionedimpa cts can be  en han ced b y t h e eff ecto fa c o mbine d ac t ion withe ne rgy e ff iciency pol i c i es.  This  co m binedeffe ct still lies und e r the same non -obs e r ved  im p acti ng  status; thatgen er a l ly can b edescribed a s unanti ci p atedand un desira ble con s e qu e nces.
Con seq uences li ke,  p r omoting  s ee k  and p ursu it  of te chnolo g ical k nowhow acquisiti on on n uclea r  we apons  a t least or/


Cover page

Preface_of English_edition

Preface of Greek edition

Abstract

1.Introduction

2.How_to be_read

2α._Reasoning schemas

2β._Functional_vs substantial role_of N. Korea

2γ._Concluding procedure

2δ. Approaching conclusions

3._Theoretical framework

4. What_has_and has not been discussed

5. N. Korea's case

5α. In advanced given

5β. Drivers of China's_policies

5γ._Uncertainty and_energy_trade

5δ._Cross-checking rational reasoning

6. Turkey's case

6α._Side by side study and_parallelisms

6β. Big_picture

6γ. Shortly illustrating EU policies' momentum

6δ. Under Morgenthau's_prism

7._Constraints and limitations

8._Conclusions

Bibliography

Greek

English

Back cover

# Introduction

And Poesy is always one like one_is the sky.  
What matters_is from where_anyone_stares_the sky.  
I_have stared the sky right through_the sea.  
(Odysseas Elytis, The_Little Nautilus)

This study – shortly bearing the_title of "Nuclear: Turkey like N._Korea?" – is a novel_approach to_nuclear weapons, that introduces the_missing link between_them and_both energy and_climate policies.

In particular, the kind of_policies that are_being associated with controlling and limiting_fossil_fuel's utilization, gas_emissions_and_harmful air_pollutants. Namely, those_of_energy efficiency_and_climate change mitigation policies.

We have all_attained_debates around the environmental impact of fossil_fuels, their contribution to_countries'_trade balance, or even_on global warming controversy and_whether climate change is indeed occurring.

During_this study,_will be_illustrated that even if climate change is milder than the estimated_one, nevertheless its policies' effect is_undeniable, while resulting impacts_can be_non-transparent_and invisible connected;_not_only observable._Moreover, the aforementioned impacts can be enhanced_by the_effect of a combined action with_energy efficiency policies. This_combined_effect still lies under the same_non-observed impacting status; that generally can_be described as unanticipated and_undesirable_consequences.

Consequences_like, promoting seek and pursuit_of technological knowhow acquisition on nuclear_weapons at least_or/