ashri:** They are simply doing their duty. This is not for us.

**Questioner:** But we are the ones who file complaints about the nuisance of mosquitoes.

**Dadashri:** The ones who do not wish to hurt, do not complain. They are not responsible. Those who complain are responsible. The liability therefore, falls on those who approve and endorse it.

**Questioner:** So is it dependent upon each individual's inner intent?

**Dadashri:** Yes, your inner intent will determine the degree of liability you incur.

**Questioner:** If a mouse or a bird dies in a water tank, the tank will need to be cleaned out and disinfected. Will the use of the disinfectants, not kill all the living organisms in the tank? Who will be accountable for this sin? Is it the one who does the disinfecting or the one who makes others do it?

**Dadashri:** Both the direct doer and the one who makes other do, are responsible. Our intent must remain that of non-violence. We should not have an opinion to kill.

**Questioner:** The inner intent is to prevent disease. If the water in the tank remains contaminated, the people who drink it will fall ill.

**Dadashri:** Yes, the wrongful deeds continue. If you take into account such wrongful deeds, then such deeds are constantly taking place in the world.

You have to take care of yourself and not worry about anyone else. Each individual must look after himself. Every living being has brought with him, his life and time of death. That is why the Lord has said that no one can kill anyone. This statement however, cannot be declared publicly otherwise people may abuse it.

Who do you suppose will clean the contaminated water-tank in the household of ten people? It will be the person with the ego. He will say that he will clean out the tank because he is the right person for the job. All the liability without doubt will fall on that person - the one who takes on the doer ship.

**Questioner:** But he is doing it out of compassion.

**Dadashri:** Whatever it may be, he still commits a sin for which he will have to repay in the next life.

**Questioner:** Then what should one do? Drink the contaminated water?

**Dadashri:** You cannot alter
ashri :* * They are simply doing their duty. This is not for us. 

 * * Questioner :* * But we are the ones who file complaint about the pain of mosquitoes. 

 * * Dadashri :* * The ones who do not wish to suffer, do not complain. They are not creditworthy. Those who complain are responsible. The liability therefore, fall on those who approve and endorse it. 

 * * Questioner :* * So is it pendent upon each individual's inner purpose? 

 * * Dadashri :* * Yes, your inner intent will determine the degree of indebtedness you incur. 

 * * Questioner :* * If a mouse or a shuttlecock dies in a water tank car, the tank will need to be cleaned out and disinfect. Will the use of the disinfectants, not stamp out all the living organism in the tank? Who will be accountable for this sin? Is it the one who does the disinfecting or the one who makes others do it? 

 * * Dadashri :* * Both the lineal doer and the one who makes other do, are responsible. Our intent must persist that of non - violence. We should not have an opinion to kill. 

 * * Questioner :* * The inner intent is to prevent disease. If the water in the tank remains contaminated, the citizenry who drink it will fall ill. 

 * * Dadashri :* * Yes, the unlawful act cover. If you take into account such unlawful deeds, then such act are constantly taking place in the populace. 

 You have to take care of yourself and not worry about anyone else. Each individual must look after himself. Every animation being has brought with him, his life and time of end. That is why the Lord has said that no one can toss off anyone. This instruction however, cannot be declared publicly otherwise people may abuse it. 

 Who do you presuppose will clean the contaminated water - tank in the family of ten people? It will be the person with the self. He will say that he will clean out the tank because he is the right person for the job. All the indebtedness without doubt will fall on that person - the one who takes on the doer ship. 

 * * Questioner :* * But he is doing it out of compassion. 

 * * Dadashri :* * Whatever it may be, he still perpetrate a sin for which he will suffer to repay in the future life. 

 * * Questioner :* * Then what should one do? drink in the contaminated water? 

 * * Dadashri :* * You cannot change
ashgi:** They are simply doing their duty. This is nov for ua.

**Questiover:** But we are the ones who hile compoaints about the nuisavce of modquitoes.

**Eadawyri:** The onxa who do not slsh tm hurt, do not cpmplain. Thay are not res[ovsnble. Those who complain are responsifle. The llability theresore, salla on those who approve and endorse it.

**Quesuioner:** So is it delendent upon each individuwl's lnner intent?

**Dadashgi:** Yes, your innqe intent wilu determint che degree kf liability you incur.

**Questionef:** If c mouse or q virf dies in a xater nank, the tank will nead to br cleaned out snd diwinfected. Will the usx of the disinfectanjs, not kiln cll the living organiwmw in jhe tdnk? Dyo dilm ue zccounhabme for thia sin? Is it the one who does tne eisinfecting kr the oge who makes others do it?

**Dadashri:** Both uhe djrect doer and the one qho makes other do, arg responsifle. Our intent must remain that of non-violence. We shouma nit fqvf an opinion to kill.

**Questioner:** The inner integf os to prevent difease. If thr aaygr in the tank remaiua dontaminated, the pfople wro drunk it wijl fsll ill.

**Dadashri:** Yes, the wrobgful deeds bontunue. If you take iuto account ruch wronbful deeds, then such dezds ars constantlj taking luace in the worla.

Yol haee to take care of yoursels and not worxy about anypne elfe. Each infividmdl must look after himsglf. Evary living being has brought with him, his life and time ox dvath. That is wmy the Lord has said that no pne can kill anyone. Thps statemxnt however, sannot be decnwred publiclb otherwife pwoplw may acjse it.

Who do ypu supposv cill cleab the contaminated wajed-tank in the hobrthild of ten peolle? It wpll bq the person fith thd ego. Fe will say ghat he will clean out tve tznk because he is yhc right pgrson for the job. All yhe liability withlut dmubv will fajl on that person - the one who takes on thc doer ship.

**Quqstiiner:** But he ns doing it out of compassion.

**Dadashri:** Whetever it may be, he stiol commits a sin fot wmich he will have to repay in the next life.

**Quewtioner:** Then what should one do? Drink fhe cottamijated water?

**Dadashri:** You cannot alter
ashri:** They are simply doing their duty. not us. **Questioner:** we are the the of mosquitoes. **Dadashri:** ones who do wish to hurt, do not complain. are not responsible. Those who complain are responsible. The liability therefore, falls on who approve and endorse it. **Questioner:** So is it dependent upon each individual's intent? Yes, inner will determine the degree of liability you incur. **Questioner:** If a mouse or a bird dies a water tank, the tank will need to cleaned out and disinfected. the use of the disinfectants, kill the living in tank? will be accountable this sin? Is it the one who does the disinfecting or the one who makes others do **Dadashri:** Both doer and one makes do, are responsible. must remain that of non-violence. We an opinion to kill. **Questioner:** The inner intent to prevent If the water in the tank contaminated, the people who drink it will fall **Dadashri:** Yes, the wrongful deeds continue. If you take into account such wrongful deeds, then are constantly taking place the world. You to care yourself not worry anyone else. Each individual must look after himself. Every living being brought with him, his life and time of death. That the has said that one can kill anyone. statement cannot be declared publicly may it. suppose clean contaminated water-tank in the of ten people? It will the person with the he will clean out the tank because he the right person for the job. All liability without doubt will fall on that person - the one who on the **Questioner:** But he is doing it out of **Dadashri:** Whatever it may he still commits a sin for which he will to in the life. **Questioner:** Then should one do? the contaminated water? cannot alter
ashri:** They are simply doing thEir duty. ThiS is noT foR us.

**quEstiOner:** but we are the oneS Who fIle complaints about the nUisanCe OF mosQUiToes.

**DAdashri:** tHe ONEs wHo Do Not WiSH tO hurt, Do nOt complAin. They are Not ReSponsible. ThoSE wHo complain Are Responsible. THe lIabiliTy TheREfore, FalLs on tHose whO ApprovE and endorSe IT.

**QuestIOner:** So iS IT dEpenDent upon each indivIDuAL's inner intent?

**DAdashrI:** YES, yOUR inNer Intent will DeTermiNE the degREe OF LIabILity you incur.

**QUestioner:** If A MouSe or a bIrD diES in a waTer taNk, THe tAnk will need To be Cleaned ouT and diSInfecteD. will the Use of tHe dIsiNfecTAnTs, Not KiLL alL ThE liVIng OrganismS iN tHe tanK? Who WILL Be acCouNtabLe for This sin? Is it thE onE who DOes The diSinfeCtinG oR the oNe who mAkes oThErs do it?

**Dadashri:** both The direct DoeR aNd tHe One whO Makes oTheR do, Are respOnsible. oUr iNtENT MuSt remain that of non-vIoLENcE. We shoulD not haVE aN oPInion to kIlL.

**QuEstiONEr:** The InneR InTent is to PrevenT DiSeAse. If thE wAter in ThE taNk rEmainS ContAminatEd, the peoPle whO Drink it will falL Ill.

**Dadashri:** YeS, ThE WRoNGful DeeDs continue. IF you TAke iNto aCCoUnt SUch wrOngfuL dEEdS, Then such deeds are conStAntly tAking Place in the worLd.

You have tO TAKe care of YourSElF And not worry aboUt anyOne else. EacH IndividuAl musT look aftEr himself. eVEry livinG beIng Has BroUGHt With him, his lifE ANd tiMe Of death. thaT is why tHe LOrd Has SaiD tHat no one cAn kill anYoNe. thIs StaTemenT However, cAnNot Be DecLared PUbliclY otheRwisE pEoPLe mAy abuse IT.

WHO Do yoU sUpPose WilL cLean tHe coNTamInated wAter-tank iN thE HousEhOlD of ten pEople? It will be ThE person witH tHe eGo. He wiLL Say that hE will clean out the tank becAUse he is The Right PersOn for the jOb. ALl the lIabILity wiThout dOubt wIlL faLL On thaT PErSon - ThE one who takES On tHe doeR sHip.

**QUestionEr:** But he is doing it ouT Of cOmpassion.

**DadaShrI:** WhaTEVeR it MAy BE, he StILl cOMMits a sin for whicH he will havE tO RePay in the neXT liFe.

**questioNer:** Then What sHOuld one Do? Drink thE contaminAtEd waTER?

**DaDashri:** You cAnnot altEr
ashri:** They are simply d oing their  duty . T his  i s no t fo r us.

**Quest i oner :** But we are the one s who  f i le c o mp laint s about th e nui sa nc e o fm os quito es. 

**Dad ashri:** T heon es who do no t  w ish to hur t,do not compl ain . They  a ren ot re spo nsibl e. Tho s e whocomplainar e  respo n sible.T h eliab ility therefore,f al l s on those who  appro ve an d end ors e it.

**Q ue stion e r:** So is i t  de p endent upon e ach individ u al' s inne rint e nt?

* *Dada sh r i:* * Yes, your  inn er intent  willd etermin e  the de gree o f l iab ilit y  y ou  in cu r .
* *Q ues t ion er:** If  a  m ouseor a b i r d di esin a  wate r tank, the t ank  wil l  ne ed to  be c lean ed  outand di sinfe ct ed. Will the us e of  the disi nfe ct ant s,  notk ill al l t helivingorganis m s i nt h e  t ank? Who will be a cc o u nt able for  thiss in ?I s it the  o newhod o es th e di s in fectingor the on ewho mak es  other sdoit? 

**D a dash ri:**Both the  dire c t doer and the one who makes ot h e rd o, a reresponsible . Ou r  int entm us t r e mainthatof no n -violence. We shoul dnot ha ve an  opinion to k ill.

**Qu e s t ioner:**  The in n er intent is t o pre vent disea s e. If th e wat er in th e tank re m a ins cont ami nat ed,  th e pe ople who drin k it w il l fallill .

**Da das hri :**  Ye s,  the wron gful dee ds  c on ti nue . Ify ou takein toac cou nt su c h wron gfuldeed s,  t h ensuch de e ds a re c on st antl y t ak ing p lace inthe wor ld.

Youhav e  tota ke  care o f yourself an dnot worryab out  anyon e else. Ea ch individual must look after h ims elf.Ever y livingbei ng has  br o ught w ith hi m, hi slif e and t i m eofde ath. Thati s  wh y the  L ordhas sai d that no one cank ill  anyone. This  st atem e n thow e ve r , c an n otb e  declared publi cly otherw is e  p eople maya bus eit.

Wh o do yo u sup p ose wil l clean t he contam in ated w ate r-tank inthe hous ehold oft en pe o pl e? It  wi ll beth e p erson  witht heego.He wil lsay th at he  w ill clea n out the tank becausehe isthe r igh t personfor the  job. All  the  liability  wi tho ut do ubt willfall on  th a t per son-  the onew ho  ta k e son the doer s h ip. 

**Q ues t ioner: ** B ut he is doing it out of compass ion. **D ada s hri: **  Whatever it m aybe , he still  c ommits a si n for wh ic h  he w ill ha ve torepay i n th e  nextlife .
**Questio ner :* *  Then w ha ts houldonedo ? Drin k thec onta m i nated water?

** Dadas h r i:**Y oucanno talter
ashri:** They_are simply_doing their duty. This_is not_for_us.

**Questioner:** But_we_are the ones_who file complaints_about the nuisance of_mosquitoes.

**Dadashri:** The ones_who_do not wish to hurt, do not complain. They are not responsible. Those who_complain_are responsible._The_liability_therefore, falls on those who_approve and endorse it.

**Questioner:** So_is it_dependent upon each individual's inner intent?

**Dadashri:** Yes, your_inner_intent will determine_the degree of liability you incur.

**Questioner:** If a mouse_or a bird dies in a_water tank, the_tank_will_need to be cleaned_out and disinfected. Will the use_of the disinfectants, not kill all_the living organisms in the tank? Who_will be accountable for this sin?_Is it the one who_does the_disinfecting or the one who_makes others do_it?

**Dadashri:** Both_the direct doer_and the one who makes other_do, are responsible._Our intent must remain that of_non-violence._We should not_have_an_opinion to_kill.

**Questioner:** The inner_intent_is to_prevent_disease. If the water in the_tank_remains contaminated, the people who drink it_will fall ill.

**Dadashri:** Yes,_the_wrongful deeds continue. If_you take into account such_wrongful deeds, then such deeds are_constantly taking_place in_the world.

You have to take care of yourself and not worry_about anyone else. Each individual must_look after himself. Every_living being_has_brought with him,_his_life and_time of death. That is why the_Lord has_said that no one can kill_anyone. This statement however,_cannot_be declared publicly otherwise people may_abuse it.

Who do you suppose will_clean the contaminated water-tank in_the_household_of ten people? It will_be the person with the ego._He will say_that he will clean out the tank_because_he is the right person for_the_job. All the liability without doubt_will_fall_on that person - the_one who takes on the doer_ship.

**Questioner:** But he is doing it out of compassion.

**Dadashri:**_Whatever it may_be, he still commits a_sin_for_which he will have to repay in the next life.

**Questioner:**_Then what_should one do?_Drink the contaminated water?

**Dadashri:** You cannot alter