ence is independent, whereas effect-violence is not. The result of intent violence in the next life is not under anyone's control. Their non-violence today is the result of their past life intent. What they do today is not their real inner progress (purushartha).

This type of ahimsa is directed towards only those life forms that are visible to the eye. It is not wrong. The Lord has said that if one were to practice ahimsa outwardly, it should be directed towards both the gross and the subtle life forms alike. More importantly one should ensure that one does not commit intent-violence towards one's own self. People are constantly committing intent-violence; they even talk about it and yet they do not understand what it is.

Intent-violence is subtle and people cannot perceive it, whereas effect violence is visible to all. All the violence that is perceived through one's thoughts, speech and acts is an effect.

# Save Yourself First From Intent-Violence

The Lord has said that the highest non-violence is that which does not hurt the soul. This means total lack of any kashaya. Any form of kashaya hurts the soul. He also said that you must make sure that no intent-violence is occurring within you. Nowadays, however, just the opposite is happening and that is why one must first stop the intent-violence. Effect violence is not under anyone's control, but we cannot say this openly. In fact, this can only be discussed with people who revere ahimsa. That is why the Lords did not disclose everything. If people were told this, they would ruin their future lives, because they would get a license to proceed with violence. They would proclaim that since effect violence is not in anyone's hands, there is nothing wrong with killing. This very intent violence is what needs to be stopped! The Lords displayed tremendous wisdom in not disclosing all this; they did not mention a word of this. What wisdom! What purity! They sanctified the ground they walked on.

Intent-violence can only be contained when effect violence is stopped, but of the two, intent-violence is more important. The Lord had said for us not to be preoccupied with the violence-non-violence of the life forms. He said that one can become truly non-violent only when one stops intent-violence.

# Defining
ence is independent, whereas effect - violence is not. The result of captive ferocity in the following life is not under anyone's control. Their non - ferocity today is the result of their past life intent. What they do today is not their actual inner progress (purushartha). 

 This character of ahimsa is steer towards only those life sentence forms that are visible to the eye. It is not amiss. The Lord has said that if one were to practice ahimsa outwardly, it should be directed towards both the gross and the subtle life form alike. More importantly one should ensure that one does not commit intent - ferocity towards one's own self. People are constantly committing purpose - violence; they even spill about it and yet they do not sympathize what it is. 

 Intent - violence is subtle and people cannot perceive it, whereas impression violence is visible to all. All the violence that is perceived through one's thoughts, speech and act is an impression. 

 # Save Yourself First From Intent - Violence 

 The Lord has said that the highest non - violence is that which does not hurt the soul. This mean total lack of any kashaya. Any form of kashaya suffer the soul. He also said that you must make certain that no purpose - violence is occurring within you. Nowadays, however, just the diametric is happening and that is why one must first stop the intent - violence. Effect ferocity is not under anyone's control, but we cannot say this openly. In fact, this can only be discussed with people who revere ahimsa. That is why the Lords did not disclose everything. If citizenry were told this, they would ruin their future lives, because they would get a license to proceed with ferocity. They would proclaim that since effect violence is not in anyone's hands, there is nothing wrong with killing. This very intent violence is what want to be stopped! The Lords displayed enormous wisdom in not unwrap all this; they did not mention a password of this. What wisdom! What honor! They sanctified the ground they walked along. 

 Intent - violence can only be contained when effect violence is stopped, but of the two, intent - violence is more important. The Lord had said for us not to be preoccupied with the ferocity - non - violence of the life human body. He said that one can become truly non - violent only when one stops intent - violence. 

 # define
encf is independent, whereas effect-violence is not. The rssult of intent violence in the next lufe iw not under anyone's covtrol. Thepr non-viooenct today is the result of bkeir lwst nmfe intent. What they do tmday is not thaif xeal inner progress (purushartha).

This eype of ajimsa is direcjed tprarda only those life forms that are vjsible uo the eye. It is npt wrong. The Lord has said thah if one were to pgactice ahinsa jytwardly, it rhould be directed towzrds both the gross and the subgle lnfe forms aoije. Lmre importaitly oge should ensure thad one dpes not commit invent-ciolence towards one's own self. People ate constandlv committing intent-viilwnce; jhey aven raly agont jt and yev they do nkt understabd what it is.

Intent-fijoence is subtme and pqople cannot perceive it, whereas effect viklence is visible to alo. All the violence thwt is perseived through one's thoughts, speech and acts is at effxcg.

# Scyc Yojesflf First From Intent-Violence

The Lord has saiq tnan the highest non-yiolence is that wnifh qoes not hurt the soul. This means total pack of any jashaya. Agy fprm of kashaya hurts the soyl. He also scid that you must makz sure that uo intgnt-viokence is occurring withnn you. Nowadays, hlwever, juag the opposite ir hsp[ening and that is why one must firwt scop the kntemt-violqnce. Effech violence is not under wnyong's condrol, but wf cannot say this openly. In facv, this can onky be discusszd witm people who redere ahimsa. Thct is whv the Uords did hot disrlose everytring. If peopla were told tiis, they roule ruun theif future lives, necause tkty would gwt a license to prpcegd with violence. Ckei would proclaik tfat spncx effqwt violence hs nut km anyune's hands, bhefe ix nothing wrong with kilming. This very intrnb violencg is what needs to be xtopped! The Lords fispleyed tcemendpus wisdom in not disclosing all fhis; they diq not mentiog a qord of this. What wisdom! What purity! They sanctifiev the ground they walkgd on.

Intent-violence ccn only be coitaineq when efxect violence is stopped, but of the teo, intent-violence is jore ikportwnt. The Lord had said for us not to be preoccupied with the violence-non-viilence of the life forks. He scid that jne rai become truly nom-violent only when one stops invent-violenwe.

# Defining
ence is independent, whereas effect-violence is not. of violence in next life is non-violence is the result their past life What they do today is not real inner progress (purushartha). This type of ahimsa is directed towards only those forms that are visible to the eye. It is not wrong. The Lord said if were practice ahimsa outwardly, it should be directed towards both the gross and the subtle life forms More importantly one should ensure that one does commit intent-violence towards one's self. People are constantly committing they talk about and they not understand what is. Intent-violence is subtle and people cannot perceive it, whereas effect violence is visible to all. All violence that through one's speech acts an effect. # First From Intent-Violence The Lord has highest non-violence is that which does not hurt soul. This total lack of any kashaya. Any of kashaya hurts the soul. He also said you must make sure that no intent-violence is occurring within you. Nowadays, however, just the happening and that is one must first the Effect is under anyone's but we cannot say this openly. In fact, this can only discussed with people who revere ahimsa. That is why the not everything. If people told this, they would their lives, because they would license proceed would that effect violence is not anyone's hands, there is nothing with killing. This very to be stopped! The Lords displayed tremendous wisdom not disclosing all this; they did not a word of this. What wisdom! What purity! They sanctified the ground walked on. only be contained when effect violence is stopped, of the two, intent-violence more important. The Lord had said for us not be with the of the life He said that can become truly when one intent-violence. Defining
ence is independent, whereas eFfect-violeNce is Not. the ReSult Of inTent violence in THe neXt life is not under anyone'S contRoL. theiR NoN-violEnce todAY iS THe rEsUlT of ThEIr Past lIfe Intent. WHat they do tOdaY iS not their reaL InNer progresS (puRushartha).

ThiS tyPe of ahImSa iS DirecTed TowarDs only THose liFe forms thAt ARe visiBLe to the EYE. IT is nOt wrong. The Lord has SAiD That if one were tO practIcE AhIMSa oUtwArdly, it shoUlD be diREcted toWArDS BOth THe gross and the Subtle life fORms Alike. MOrE imPOrtantLy one ShOUld Ensure that oNe doEs not commIt inteNT-violenCE towardS one's oWn sElf. peopLE aRe ConStANtlY CoMmiTTinG intent-vIoLeNce; thEy evEN TALk abOut It anD yet tHey do not underStaNd whAT it Is.

IntEnt-viOlenCe Is subTle and PeoplE cAnnot perceive it, WherEas effect VioLeNce Is VisibLE to all. all The ViolencE that is PErcEiVED ThRough one's thoughts, sPeECH aNd acts is An effeCT.

# SAvE yourself fiRst from iNTent-VIoleNCe

the Lord hAs said THaT tHe higheSt Non-vioLeNce Is tHat whICh doEs not hUrt the soUl. ThiS Means total lack OF any kashaya. AnY FoRM Of KAshaYa hUrts the soul. he alSO saiD thaT YoU muST make Sure tHaT No INtent-violence is occuRrIng witHin yoU. Nowadays, howeVer, just the OPPOsite is hAppeNInG And that is why onE must First stop tHE intent-vIolenCe. Effect Violence iS NOt under aNyoNe's ConTroL, BUt We cannot say thIS OpenLy. in fact, tHis Can only Be dIscUssEd wItH people whO revere aHiMsA. THaT is Why thE lords did NoT diScLosE everYThing. IF peopLe weRe ToLD thIs, they wOUlD RUin tHeIr FutuRe lIvEs, becAuse THey Would geT a license To pROceeD wItH violenCe. They would prOcLaim that siNcE efFect viOLEnce is noT in anyone's hands, there is nOThing wrOng With kIlliNg. This verY inTent viOleNCe is whAt needS to be StOppED! the LoRDS dIspLaYed tremendOUS wiSdom iN nOt diSclosinG all this; they did not MEntIon a word of thiS. WhAt wiSDOm! whaT PuRIty! thEY saNCTified the ground They walked On.

iNtEnt-violencE Can OnLy be conTained wHen efFEct violEnce is stoPped, but of ThE two, INTenT-violence iS more impOrtant. The lOrd haD SaId for Us nOt to be PrEocCupieD with tHE viOlencE-non-viOlEnce of The liFe Forms. He sAid that one can become trulY non-viOlent OnlY when one sTopS IntEnt-violenCe.

# DeFining
ence is independent, where as effect- viole nce  is  n ot.Theresult of inte n t vi olence in the next lif e isno t  und e ranyon e's con t ro l .  Th ei rnon -v i ol encetod ay is t he resultofth eir past lif e  i ntent. Wha t t hey do today  is  not t he irr eal i nne r pro gress( purush artha).
Th i s type of ahim s a  i s di rected towards on l yt hose life form s that  a r ev i sib leto the eye .It is not wro n g. T h e L o rd has said t hat if onew ere  to pr ac tic e  ahims a out wa r dly , it should  bedirectedtoward s  both t h e gross  and t hesub tlel if efor ms ali k e.  Mo r e i mportant ly  o ne sh ould e n s uretha t on e doe s not commitint ent- v iol encetowar ds o ne 's ow n self . Peo pl e are constantl y co mmittingint en t-v io lence ;  theyeve n t alk abo ut it a n d y et t h ey  do not understand  w h a tit is.
Intent - vi ol e nce is s ub tle  and p eople  can n ot  perceiv e it,w he re as effe ct  viole nc e i s v isibl e  toall. A ll the v iolen c e that is perc e ived througho ne ' s  t h ough ts,  speech and  act s  isan e f fe ct. 
# Sa ve Yo ur s el f  First From Intent- Vi olence 

The  Lord has sai d that the h i ghest no n-vi o le n ce is that whi ch do es not hur t  the sou l. Th is means  total la c k  of anykas hay a.Any f or m of kashayah u rtsth e soul.  He  also s aid  th atyou  m ust makesure tha tno  i nt ent -viol e nce is o cc urr in g w ithin you. N owada ys,ho we v er,  just t h eo p posi te  i s ha ppe ni ng an d th a t i s why o ne must f irs t  sto pth e inten t-violence. E ff ect violen ce  is  not u n d er anyon e's control, but we can n ot saythi s ope nly.  In fact,  th is can  on l y be d iscuss ed wi th  pe o p le wh o re ver eahimsa. Th a t  is  whyth e Lo rds did  not disclose ever y thi ng. If people  we re t o l dthi s ,t hey  w o uld r uin their futur e lives, b ec a us e they wou l d g et  a lice nse toproce e d withviolence.  They wou ld  pro c l aim  that sinc e effect  violence is no t  i n any one 's han ds , t hereis not h ing  wron g with  k illing . Thi svery int ent violence is what ne eds to  be s top ped! TheLor d s d isplayedtrem endous wis dom  in  notdis c losin g al l  t his ;  they  did not menti o na w o r dof this. Wh a t wis dom!Wha t  purit y! T hey sanctified th e  ground they w alke d on. 

I n tent -v iolence can on lybe c ontained  w hen effectviolence  i s  stop ped, b ut ofthe two , in t ent-vi olen ceis more i mpo rt a nt. The  L or d  had s aidfo r us n ot tob e pr e o ccupied with the  viol e n ce-no n -vi olenc eof thel ifeforms. Hesaid that o ne can  bec ome t ruly no n- violen t o nl y when one stops int ent-v iolence .
# D efi ning
ence is_independent, whereas_effect-violence is not. The_result of_intent_violence in_the_next life is_not under anyone's_control. Their non-violence today_is the result_of_their past life intent. What they do today is not their real inner progress_(purushartha).

This_type of_ahimsa_is_directed towards only those life_forms that are visible to_the eye._It is not wrong. The Lord has said_that_if one were_to practice ahimsa outwardly, it should be directed towards_both the gross and the subtle_life forms alike._More_importantly_one should ensure that_one does not commit intent-violence towards_one's own self. People are constantly_committing intent-violence; they even talk about it_and yet they do not understand_what it is.

Intent-violence is subtle_and people_cannot perceive it, whereas effect_violence is visible_to all._All the violence_that is perceived through one's thoughts,_speech and acts_is an effect.

# Save Yourself First_From_Intent-Violence

The Lord has_said_that_the highest_non-violence is that_which_does not_hurt_the soul. This means total lack_of_any kashaya. Any form of kashaya hurts_the soul. He also_said_that you must make_sure that no intent-violence is_occurring within you. Nowadays, however, just_the opposite_is happening_and that is why one must first stop the intent-violence. Effect_violence is not under anyone's control,_but we cannot say_this openly._In_fact, this can_only_be discussed_with people who revere ahimsa. That is_why the_Lords did not disclose everything. If_people were told this,_they_would ruin their future lives, because_they would get a license to_proceed with violence. They would_proclaim_that_since effect violence is not_in anyone's hands, there is nothing_wrong with killing._This very intent violence is what needs_to_be stopped! The Lords displayed tremendous_wisdom_in not disclosing all this; they_did_not_mention a word of this._What wisdom! What purity! They sanctified_the ground they walked on.

Intent-violence can only be contained_when effect violence_is stopped, but of the_two,_intent-violence_is more important. The Lord had said for us not_to be_preoccupied with the_violence-non-violence of the life forms. He said that one can_become truly non-violent only when one stops_intent-violence.

# Defining