 of one state and the aforementioned policies' category of other state(s) can not only be identified by peaceful means. In particular can be associated with targeting in domestic production of nuclear weapons; along with accompanied programmes (i.e. ballistic missiles).

  3. Thus, eventually will be examined whether Turkey could include in its foreign policy toolset similar components to those just mentioned in second pillar. This case study, will be developed on the ground of Turkey's reaction to EU's policies that are targeting in fading out of transitional period of natural gas.

Nevertheless, should be stated that paper's structure is slightly different, by organizing provided information in separate chapters according to studied country. The latter is attributed in having a less complex structure that could produce perplexities while allowing readers to easier locate needed information.

## Functional vs substantial role of N. Korea

At this point, is considered useful to clarify the difference between functional and substantial role of N. Korea, for this study.

As explicitly stated above, the functional role of N. Korea is to bridge the two phases of Turkey's foreign policy to EU's aforementioned policies. In particular, between the noted as occurred – which is generally described as "pipes diplomacy" – and the hypothesized which will be tested.

Nevertheless, N. Korea's substantial role does not exactly coincide. More specifically, is about clearly pointing out that during transition from coal to liquid fossil fuels and during the disengagement of them, is not the energy source itself that results in the various geopolitical events. Rather are, the taking place or anticipated to be realized (absolute or relative) changes to balance of power, following other associated changes; such as, modification of energy trade partnership statuses.

Such shift of states' position of power, most probable will play key role during following years, since we are in the middle of a transitional period which is bounded by two different eras; as described by the dominated source of energy. The one that we are just about to live behind in EU, by fading out to natural gas, and the one of RES domination. Hence we are about to live in interesting times, that will be studied by historians and political scientists of future.

## Concluding procedure

Following the taking of evidence, the following logical path of argumentation should be noted.

At the beginning, the suggested theory – of the policies under investigation and nuclear weapons linking – would be explored and the factual ground of supported evidences will be highlighted; at
of one state and the aforementioned policies' category of early state(s) cannot merely be identified by peaceful mean. In particular can be consort with targeting in domestic product of nuclear weapons; along with accompanied program (i.e. ballistic missiles). 

   3. therefore, eventually will be examined whether Turkey could include in its foreign policy toolset exchangeable components to those just mentioned in second pillar. This case survey, will be developed on the ground of Turkey's reaction to EU's policy that are targeting in fading out of transitional period of lifelike gas. 

 however, should be stated that paper's structure is slightly unlike, by organizing provided information in separate chapters according to studied country. The latter is attributed in having a less complex structure that could produce perplexities while allowing readers to easier locate needed data. 

 # # running vs substantial role of N. Korea 

 At this point, is consider useful to clarify the difference between functional and solid role of N. Korea, for this study. 

 As explicitly stated above, the functional function of N. Korea is to bridge the two phases of Turkey's foreign policy to EU's aforementioned policies. In particular, between the noted as occur – which is generally described as " pipes diplomacy " – and the speculate which will be tested. 

 however, N. Korea's substantial role does not exactly coincide. More specifically, is about clearly point out that during transition from coal to liquid dodo fuels and during the detachment of them, is not the energy source itself that results in the various geopolitical events. quite are, the taking place or expect to be realized (absolute or proportional) changes to balance of power, following early associated changes; such as, modification of energy barter partnership statuses. 

 Such transformation of states' status of power, most probable will play key role during come years, since we are in the middle of a transitional menstruation which is bounded by two different era; as described by the dominated source of energy. The one that we are just about to live behind in EU, by fading out to natural gas, and the one of RES domination. Hence we are about to populate in interesting prison term, that will be study by historians and political scientists of future. 

 # # Concluding procedure 

 Following the taking of evidence, the adopt logical path of argumentation should be note. 

 At the beginning, the suggested theory – of the policies under investigation and nuclear weapons yoke – would be explored and the factual ground of confirm evidences will be highlighted; at
 of one state and the aforeoentioned policnws' catxgory or other rtate(s) can not only be identmfiee by kvaceful means. In partkcular caj be assiciaued with targetinj in domcftic iroduetmon of nuclear eeapons; almng with accom[avizd programmes (i.e. ballistic missiles).

  3. Thus, rvfntually will fe eqaiines whether Turkey could include in jts fortign policy toolsey similar components to thlse uust mentioned in decond pillqr. Trus case studh, will be developed on the ground of Turkey's reaction to EB's policies tyat dre targetiig in sading out on transhtional period of natmral jas.

Nwvertheless, should be stated that paper'f structuse is slightly diffwrwnt, bi orgdnizkbg orobived inforlatmon in sepadate chaptees according to stuciqe country. The lattew ys attributed in having a less complex vtrhcture that could produxe perplexities while allowing readers to easier locate needed information.

## Funcdionam vs smbstxbtlal role of N. Korea

At this point, is considereq uxenul to clarify tme difference betwrej gonctional and rubstaufizl role of N. Korea, for thys stydy.

As expjiciyly stated above, the functiinal role of B. Korea is to bridye the two pkases pf Tutkey's foreign policy to EU's aforementilned polidkes. In particulaf, bvtwean the noted as occurred – rhich is jenerclly deszribgd as "pypes diplolacy" – and the hypothesizfd whnch whll be teshed.

Nevertheless, N. Korea's substaivial role doex tot exactly coingide. More specisically, is aboot clearlv poinging out tgat durmng transitijn from coal dl liquid fosvil fuelf ane dueing thd disengagement of them, ps not the energy source itrslf that resultw ib the various gropulieibal edants. Rather dre, ghe yakine place or cngicilated to be realized (absklute or relative) vhwnges to balance of power, folkowing other assoclated chenges; xucr as, modification of energy trzde partnfrsmip statuses.

Stch whift of staces' position of power, most probable will play key role duting following years, xlnce we are mn the middle ox a transitional peruod which is bounced by two different sras; av desfribed by the dominated source of energy. The one that we are just about ti live behind in EH, by faditg put to natnrel gas, and the onv of RES domination. Hence we are about tm jive in interesting times, thst will be studked by historians and pomitical xcientists of future.

## Concluding procedure

Following the baking of evidsnce, the fullowing logical psth of argunentatiin smould be noted.

Xt yhc beginninh, tht suygested theory – of the policies ubder ibvfstigation and nnclear weapoks linkpng – woold be explored ahd tgf facjual ground of supported evicences will be highlpgheed; at
of one state and the aforementioned policies' other can not be identified by be with targeting in production of nuclear along with accompanied programmes (i.e. ballistic 3. Thus, eventually will be examined whether Turkey could include in its foreign toolset similar components to those just mentioned in second pillar. This case study, be on ground Turkey's reaction to EU's policies that are targeting in fading out of transitional period of natural Nevertheless, should be stated that paper's structure is different, by organizing provided in separate chapters according to country. latter is in a complex structure that produce perplexities while allowing readers to easier locate needed information. ## Functional vs substantial role of N. At this considered useful clarify difference functional and substantial N. Korea, for this study. As the functional role of N. Korea is to the two of Turkey's foreign policy to EU's policies. In particular, between the noted as occurred which is generally described as "pipes diplomacy" – and the hypothesized which will be tested. Korea's substantial role does exactly coincide. More is clearly out during transition coal to liquid fossil fuels and during the disengagement of them, not the energy source itself that results in the various Rather the taking place anticipated to be realized or changes to balance of other changes; of trade statuses. Such shift of position of power, most probable play key role during in the middle of a transitional period which bounded by two different eras; as described the dominated source of energy. The one that we are just about live behind by fading out to natural gas, and the of RES domination. Hence are about to live in interesting times, that will studied historians and scientists of future. Concluding procedure Following taking of evidence, logical path argumentation be beginning, the suggested theory – of policies investigation and nuclear weapons linking would and the factual ground of supported evidences will be highlighted; at
 of one state and the aforementIoned policIes' caTegOry Of OtheR staTe(s) can not only bE IdenTified by peaceful means. IN partIcULar cAN bE assoCiated wITh TARgeTiNg In dOmEStIc proDucTion of nUclear weapOns; AlOng with accomPAnIed programMes (I.e. ballistic mIssIles).

  3. ThUs, EveNTuallY wiLl be eXamineD WhetheR Turkey coUlD IncludE In its foREIgN polIcy toolset similar COmPOnents to those jUst menTiONeD IN seConD pillar. ThiS cAse stUDy, will bE DeVELOpeD On the ground of turkey's reacTIon To EU's pOlIciES that aRe tarGeTIng In fading out Of trAnsitionaL perioD Of naturAL gas.

NevErthelEss, ShoUld bE StAtEd tHaT PapER's StrUCtuRe is sligHtLy DiffeRent, BY ORGaniZinG proVided Information in SepAratE ChaPters AccorDing To StudiEd counTry. ThE lAtter is attributEd in Having a leSs cOmPleX sTructURe that CouLd pRoduce pErplexiTIes WhILE AlLowing readers to easIeR LOcAte needeD inforMAtIoN.

## functionAl Vs sUbstANTial rOle oF n. KOrea

At thIs poinT, Is CoNsidereD uSeful tO cLarIfy The diFFereNce betWeen funcTionaL And substantial ROle of N. Korea, foR ThIS StUDy.

As ExpLicitly statEd abOVe, thE funCTiOnaL Role oF N. KorEa IS tO Bridge the two phases oF TUrkey's ForeiGn policy to EU's AforementiONED policieS. In pARtICular, between thE noteD as occurreD – Which is gEneraLly descrIbed as "pipES DiplomacY" – anD thE hyPotHESiZed which will bE TEsteD.

NEvertheLesS, N. Korea'S suBstAntIal RoLe does not Exactly cOiNcIdE. MOre SpeciFIcally, is AbOut ClEarLy poiNTing ouT that DuriNg TrANsiTion froM CoAL To liQuId FossIl fUeLs and DuriNG thE disengAgement of TheM, Is noT tHe Energy sOurce itself thAt Results in tHe VarIous geOPOlitical Events. Rather are, the takinG Place or AntIcipaTed tO be realizEd (aBsolutE or RElativE) changEs to bAlAncE OF poweR, FOlLowInG other assoCIAteD chanGeS; sucH as, modiFication of energy trADe pArtnership staTusEs.

SuCH ShIft OF sTAteS' pOSitION of power, most proBable will pLaY KeY role durinG FolLoWing yeaRs, since We are IN the midDle of a traNsitional PeRiod WHIch Is bounded bY two diffErent eras; AS descRIbEd by tHe dOminatEd SouRce of Energy. tHe oNe thaT we are JuSt abouT to liVe Behind in eU, by fading out to natural gAs, and tHe one Of ReS dominatIon. hEncE we are aboUt to Live in inteResTinG timeS, thAT will Be stUDiEd bY HistoRianS And politiCAl SciENTiSts of future.

## cONCluDing pRocEDure

FoLlowIng the taking of eviDEnce, the followiNg loGICal PatH Of arGuMentation shoulD be NoTED.

At the beGiNning, the sugGested thEoRY – of thE policIes undEr invesTIGaTIon and NuclEar Weapons liNkiNg – WOuld be eXpLoREd and tHe faCtUal groUnd of sUPporTED evidences will be HighlIGHted; aT
 of one state and the afor ementioned  poli cie s'ca tego ry o f other state( s ) ca n not only be identifi ed by  p e acef u lmeans . In pa r ti c u lar  c an  be  a s so ciate d w ith tar geting indom es tic producti o nof nuclear  we apons; along  wi th acc om pan i ed pr ogr ammes  (i.e. ballis tic missi le s ).

 3 . Thus, e ve ntua lly will be exami n ed whether Turkey  could  i n cl u d e i n i ts foreign  p olicy toolset si m i l arc omponents tothose justm ent ionedin  se c ond pi llar.  T h iscase study,  wil l be deve lopedo n the g r ound of  Turke y's  re acti o nto  EU 's pol i ci est hat  are tar ge ti ng in  fad i n g outoftran sitio nal period of  na tura l  ga s.

N evert hele ss , sho uld be  stat ed  that paper's s truc ture is s lig ht lydi ffere n t, byorg ani zing pr ovidedi nfo rm a t i on  in separate chapt er s ac cordingto stu d ie dc ountry.Th e l atte r is at trib u te d in hav ing al es scomplex  s tructu re  th atcould prod uce pe rplexiti es wh i le allowing re a ders to easie r  l o c at e  nee ded  informatio n.
# # Fu ncti o na l v s  subs tanti al ro l e of N. Korea

At t hi s poin t, is  considered u seful to c l a r ify thediff e re n ce between fun ction al and sub s tantialroleof N. Ko rea, fort h is study .
Asexp lic i t ly  stated above , thefu nctiona l r ole ofN.Kor eaisto  bridge t he two p ha se sof  Tu rkey' s  foreign  p oli cy  to  EU's aforem entio nedpo li c ies . In pa r ti c u lar,  b et ween  th enoted  aso ccu rred –which isgen e rall yde scribed  as "pipes di pl omacy" – a nd  th e hypo t h esized w hich will be tested.

N e verthel ess , N.Kore a's subst ant ial ro led oes no t exac tly c oi nci d e . Mor e sp eci fi cally, isa b out  clea rl y po intingout that during tr a nsi tion from coa l t o li q u id  fo s si l  fu el s  an d during the dise ngagementof th em, is not the  e nergy s ource i tself that re sults inthe vario us  geo p o lit ical event s. Rathe r are, th e  taki n gplace  or  antic ip ate d tobe rea l ize d (ab solute  o r rela tive)  c hanges t o balance of power, fol lowing  othe r a ssociated  ch a nge s; such a s, m odificatio n o f e nergy  tr a de pa rtne r sh ips tatus es.Such shif t  o f s t a te s' position o f  po wer,mos t  proba blewill play key rol e  during follow ingy e ars , s i ncewe  are in the mi ddl eo f  a trans it ional perio d whichis bound ed bytwo di fferent e ra s ; as d escr ibe d by thedom in a ted sou rc eo f ener gy.Th e onethat w e  are j ust about to liv e beh i n d inE U,by fa di ng outt o na tural gas,  and the on e of R ES d omina tion. H en ce weare  a bout to li v e in inte resti ng time s,  tha t w ill be  stu d i ed by  his to ria ns and po l i ti c al  s c ien tist s offu ture .

## Con c luding p roc e dure

F ol low i n g thet ak i n g of evide nce , the f ollowing l o gica l  p a th of  argum entati on shou l d b enoted.
At t he beginn ing, thes ugg es tedtheory –  o f th epol ic ies under inves tigation  and nuc l e ar wea pon s  lin k ing –wo uld be explo red a nd the fac t u algroundo f s upp ort ed e vid ence s  will be highlighted; at 
 of_one state_and the aforementioned policies'_category of_other_state(s) can_not_only be identified_by peaceful means._In particular can be_associated with targeting_in_domestic production of nuclear weapons; along with accompanied programmes (i.e. ballistic missiles).

  3._Thus,_eventually will_be_examined_whether Turkey could include in_its foreign policy toolset similar_components to_those just mentioned in second pillar. This case_study,_will be developed_on the ground of Turkey's reaction to EU's policies_that are targeting in fading out_of transitional period_of_natural_gas.

Nevertheless, should be stated_that paper's structure is slightly different,_by organizing provided information in separate_chapters according to studied country. The latter_is attributed in having a less_complex structure that could produce_perplexities while_allowing readers to easier locate_needed information.

## Functional_vs substantial_role of N._Korea

At this point, is considered useful_to clarify the_difference between functional and substantial role_of_N. Korea, for_this_study.

As_explicitly stated_above, the functional_role_of N._Korea_is to bridge the two phases_of_Turkey's foreign policy to EU's aforementioned policies._In particular, between the_noted_as occurred – which_is generally described as "pipes_diplomacy" – and the hypothesized which_will be_tested.

Nevertheless, N._Korea's substantial role does not exactly coincide. More specifically, is about_clearly pointing out that during transition_from coal to liquid_fossil fuels_and_during the disengagement_of_them, is_not the energy source itself that results_in the_various geopolitical events. Rather are, the_taking place or anticipated_to_be realized (absolute or relative) changes_to balance of power, following other_associated changes; such as, modification_of_energy_trade partnership statuses.

Such shift of_states' position of power, most probable_will play key_role during following years, since we are_in_the middle of a transitional period_which_is bounded by two different eras;_as_described_by the dominated source of_energy. The one that we are_just about to live behind in EU, by fading_out to natural_gas, and the one of_RES_domination._Hence we are about to live in interesting times, that_will be_studied by historians_and political scientists of future.

## Concluding procedure

Following the taking of_evidence, the following logical path of argumentation_should be noted.

At the beginning, the suggested theory – of the_policies under investigation and nuclear weapons linking –_would be explored and the factual ground_of supported evidences will_be_highlighted; at