 the extent of being affected by China's energy efficiency and climate change mitigation policies – could influence properties of nuclear weapons development schedule; namely planned time allocation. The focused time frame of latter, would not be since the very early beginning of N. Korea's nuclear programme, but rather since it was principally manifested by Kim Jong-Un (Mansourov, 2014) with a stress to recent developments.

  2. How could Turkey react, when EU's transition to a new energy era – as described by a RES dominated energy-mix – or even earlier when phasing out comes to a point where Turkey's natural gas transit services will not be considered as strategic asset anymore. And more precisely, whether EU's energy efficiency and climate change mitigation policies could likely contribute (and in combination with other factors) to Turkey's reflection upon nuclear weapons domestic production.

But of course, before everything, all the necessary infos and terms on political realism and how these are being adapted into the context of this study will be provided; so that to make easier causation's comprehension and let readers to reach conclusions on their own.

# How to be read

He who learns but does not think, is lost!  
He who thinks but does not learn is in great danger.  
(Confucius)

Before delving into study's inner core and answering title's issue at stake, is crucial that all readers should not omit reading this chapter. The reason for this, is so that reader can easier follow writer's argumentation till concluding closure and since early start.

Beside reading this chapter, also reading theoretical framework and limitations of study, is considered useful and also being suggested by the writer.

## Reasoning schemas

The following reasoning schemas, can be noted.

  1. Initially, having in mind Turkey's behavior pattern in exercising its foreign policy and in particular regarding Turkey's reaction to EU's energy efficiency and climate change mitigation policies, in reference to those of controlling the gradual transition to RES domination through natural gas domination in energy mix – what is shortly described by the generic term "pipes diplomacy" – can be said that Turkey have utilized peaceful means. So Turkey's reaction is the stepping stone in connecting foreign policy of one country with the particular sub-genre of energy and climate policies than have been adopted by other countries; at least by peaceful means.

  2. Afterwards, by studying N. Korea's paradigm, is illustrated the fact that such linkage between foreign policy
the extent of being affected by China's energy efficiency and climate change mitigation policy – could determine properties of nuclear weapons development agenda; namely planned time allocation. The focused clock time frame of latter, would not be since the very early beginning of N. Korea's nuclear programme, but preferably since it was principally manifested by Kim Jong - Un (Mansourov, 2014) with a tension to recent developments. 

   2. How could Turkey react, when EU's transition to a new department of energy era – as described by a RES dominate energy - mix – or even earlier when phase out comes to a point where Turkey's natural natural gas transit services will not be considered as strategic asset anymore. And more precisely, whether EU's energy efficiency and climate variety mitigation policy could likely contribute (and in combination with other component) to Turkey's reflection upon nuclear weapons domestic production. 

 But of course, before everything, all the necessary infos and term on political realism and how these are being adapted into the context of this study will be provided; so that to make easier causation's comprehension and let readers to achieve conclusions on their own. 

 # How to be read 

 He who memorize but does not intend, is lost!  
 He who thinks but does not determine is in great danger.  
 (Confucius) 

 Before delving into study's inside core and answering title's issue at stake, is crucial that all readers should not omit reading this chapter. The reason for this, is so that reader can easy pursue writer's argumentation till concluding closure and since early start. 

 Beside reading this chapter, besides reading theoretical framework and limitations of study, is considered useful and also being suggested by the writer. 

 # # Reasoning outline 

 The following reasoning outline, can be noted. 

   1. Initially, having in judgment Turkey's behavior form in exercising its alien policy and in particular involve Turkey's reaction to EU's energy efficiency and climate variety mitigation policies, in reference to those of controlling the gradual transition to RES domination through natural gas domination in energy mix – what is shortly described by the generic term " pipes delicacy " – can be said that Turkey have utilized passive means. So Turkey's reaction is the stepping stone in connecting foreign policy of one area with the particular sub - genre of energy and climate policies than have been adopted by other nation; at least by passive mean. 

   2. Afterwards, by studying N. Korea's prototype, is illustrated the fact that such linkage between foreign policy
 thf extent of being affecttd by China's eneryt effiriency znd climxte change mitigation policixs – xould influence properties uf nucleag weapons devtlopment schedule; namely ijannsf tikx allocation. Thg focused tike frame of ladtdr, would not be since the very early feginnimg of N. Korea's nocleag [rogdamme, but rather since it was prindipally manifested bu Kim Jong-Un (Mansourov, 2014) wihh a stress to recent fevelopmentw.

  2. Riw could Turyey react, when EU's trahsition to a new energy era – as descxibed by a TZW dlkinated enecgy-mix – or even eavkier wven phaxing out comes to a point where Turkey's netural gas transit sgrvices winl not be consideree qs sttateghc arwet angmprs. And lorx precisely, whether EU'w energy efficiency age climate chahge mieidation policies could likely contribute (ans in combination with orher factors) to Turkei's reflectyon upon nuclear weapons domestic production.

But ox coucsd, btfire exwrjthing, all the necessary infos and terms on pjmiuicsl realism and how these srf nging adapted ivto thz ckntext of this stufy will be peovided; sj thst to make easier causation'w comprehenspon qnd let readers to reach concuusipns om their own.

# How to be rzad

He sho learns hut does hut think, is lost!  
Hv whm thinks but does not learg is in gceat banger.  
(Zonfocius)

Besore delvijg inbm study's inner corf and atswering tltle's issue at stake, is crucial that all readgrs shmuld not omit reading this chapter. The rgason for this, is so than reader ran easier fjllow writer's wrgumentatioi till cogclueing closurd and since earky start.

Bvsnde readibg this chapter, alxo tezding theoreticcu framework and kimktaeilnx jx study, is cmnsiaerdc usewul and alsi beimg suggested by the fritsr.

## Reasoning schemss

Bhe folloqing reafoning schemax, can be noted.

  1. Ijitianly, havimg yn mind Turkey's behavior pattedn in exegcifing its forqign policy and nn particular regarding Turkey's reaction to EU's energy effuciency and climate ghange mitigetion [olicies, hn reference to thosw of controlling uhe gradual transition fo RES domijation through natural gas domination in energy mix – what is shortly desceibed uy the generid tetm "piies biplomasy" – rai be said that Tugkey have utilized peaceful meanr. So Turnev's reaction is the stepping syove in connectkng foreign policy of ons countru with the particular sub-genre pf energy and climate pokicies tyan hzve bevh edopted by other coumtries; at lwast by peageful means.

  2. Xftrraards, by dtudbiny N. Korea's paradigm, is illustratee the daft that such linnage betweek noreigh polisy
the extent of being affected by China's and change mitigation – could influence schedule; planned time allocation. focused time frame latter, would not be since the early beginning of N. Korea's nuclear programme, but rather since it was principally by Kim Jong-Un (Mansourov, 2014) with a stress to recent developments. 2. How Turkey when transition a new energy era – as described by a RES dominated energy-mix – or even earlier phasing out comes to a point where Turkey's gas transit services will be considered as strategic asset And precisely, whether energy and change mitigation policies likely contribute (and in combination with other factors) to Turkey's reflection upon nuclear weapons domestic production. But course, before the necessary and on realism and how being adapted into the context of be provided; so that to make easier causation's and let to reach conclusions on their own. How to be read He who learns but not think, is lost! He who thinks but does not learn is in great danger. delving into study's inner and answering title's at is that readers should omit reading this chapter. The reason for this, is so that can easier follow writer's argumentation till concluding closure and since Beside this chapter, also theoretical framework and limitations study, considered useful and also by writer. The reasoning can be noted. 1. having in mind Turkey's behavior in exercising its foreign Turkey's reaction to EU's energy efficiency and climate mitigation policies, in reference to those of the gradual transition to RES domination through natural gas domination in energy – what described by the generic term "pipes diplomacy" – be said that Turkey utilized peaceful means. So Turkey's reaction is the stepping in foreign policy one country with particular sub-genre of and climate policies been adopted other at means. 2. Afterwards, by studying N. paradigm, illustrated the fact that such between
 the extent of being affected bY China's eneRgy efFicIenCy And cLimaTe change mitigaTIon pOlicies – could influence pRoperTiES of nUClEar weApons deVElOPMenT sChEduLe; NAmEly plAnnEd time aLlocation. THe fOcUsed time framE Of Latter, woulD noT be since the vEry Early bEgInnINg of N. korEa's nuClear pROgrammE, but ratheR sINce it wAS princiPALlY manIfested by Kim Jong-UN (maNSourov, 2014) with a strEss to rEcENt DEVelOpmEnts.

  2. How couLd turkeY React, whEN Eu'S TRanSItion to a new enErgy era – as deSCriBed by a rEs doMInated EnergY-mIX – or Even earlier When Phasing ouT comes TO a point WHere TurKey's naTurAl gAs trANsIt SerViCEs wILl Not BE coNsidered As StRategIc asSET ANymoRe. ANd moRe preCisely, whether eU's EnerGY efFicieNcy anD cliMaTe chaNge mitIgatiOn Policies could liKely ContributE (anD iN coMbInatiON with oTheR faCtors) to turkey's REflEcTION uPon nuclear weapons dOmESTiC productIon.

But OF cOuRSe, before EvEryThinG, ALl the NeceSSaRy infos aNd termS On PoLitical ReAlism aNd How TheSe are BEing AdapteD into the ConteXT of this study wiLL be provided; so THaT TO mAKe eaSieR causation's CompREhenSion ANd Let REaderS to reAcH CoNClusions on their own.

# HOw To be reAd

He wHo learns but doEs not think, IS LOst!  
He who ThinKS bUT does not learn iS in grEat danger.  
(CONfucius)

BEfore Delving iNto study's INNer core aNd aNswEriNg tITLe'S issue at stake, IS CrucIaL that alL reAders shOulD noT omIt rEaDing this cHapter. ThE rEaSoN fOr tHis, is SO that reaDeR caN eAsiEr folLOw writEr's arGumeNtAtIOn tIll concLUdING cloSuRe And sIncE eArly sTart.

bEsiDe readiNg this chaPteR, Also ReAdIng theoRetical framewOrK and limitaTiOns Of studY, IS consideRed useful and also being suGGested bY thE writEr.

## ReAsoning scHemAs

The fOllOWing reAsoninG scheMaS, caN BE noteD.

  1. iNiTiaLlY, having in mIND TuRkey's BeHaviOr patteRn in exercising its fOReiGn policy and in ParTicuLAR rEgaRDiNG TuRkEY's rEACtion to EU's energY efficiencY aND cLimate chanGE miTiGation pOlicies, In refERence to Those of coNtrolling ThE graDUAl tRansition tO RES domiNation thrOUgh naTUrAl gas DomInatioN iN enErgy mIx – what IS shOrtly DescriBeD by the GenerIc Term "pipeS diplomacy" – can be said that turkey Have uTilIzed peaceFul MEanS. So Turkey'S reaCtion is the StePpiNg stoNe iN ConneCtinG FoReiGN poliCy of ONe country WItH thE PArTicular sub-gENRE of EnergY anD ClimatE polIcies than have been ADopted by other cOuntRIEs; aT leASt by PeAceful means.

  2. AftErwArDS, By studyiNg n. Korea's paraDigm, is ilLuSTrateD the faCt that Such linKAGe BEtween ForeIgn Policy
 the extent of being affec ted by Chi na'sene rgy  e ffic ienc y and climatec hang e mitigation policies– cou ld infl u en ce pr opertie s  o f nuc le ar  we ap o ns  deve lop ment sc hedule; na mel yplanned time al location.The  focused tim e f rame o flat t er, w oul d not  be si n ce the  very ear ly beginn i ng of N . Ko rea' s nuclear program m e, but rather sin ce itwa s  p r i nci pal ly manifes te d byK im Jong - Un ( M ans o urov, 2014) w ith a stres s  to  recen tdev e lopmen ts.
 2 . H ow could Tu rkey  react, w hen EU ' s trans i tion to  a new  en erg y er a  –  a s d es c rib e dbya  RE S domina te denerg y-mi x – or e ven  ear lierwhen phasingout  com e s t o a p ointwher eTurke y's na tural  g as transit serv ices  will not  be  c ons id ereda s stra teg icasset a nymore. And  m o r e  p recisely, whetherEU ' s  e nergy ef ficien c yan d  climate  c han ge m i t igati on p o li cies cou ld lik e ly  c ontribu te  (andin  co mbi natio n  wit h othe r factor s) to Turkey's refle c tion upon nuc l ea r we a pons  do mestic prod ucti o n.
Buto fcou r se, b efore  e v er y thing, all the nece ss ary in fos a nd terms on p olitical r e a l ism andhowt he s e are being ad apted  into thec ontext o f thi s studywill be p r o vided; s o t hat  to  ma k e  e asier causati o n 's c om prehens ion  and le t r ead ers  to  r each conc lusionson  t he ir  ow n.

# How to b erea d
He  whol earnsbut d oesno tt hin k, is l o st !  
He  w ho  thi nks  b ut do es n o t l earn is  in great  da n ger.  
( Confuci us)

Before d el ving intost udy 's inn e r  core an d answering title's iss u e at st ake , iscruc ial thatall  reade rss houldnot om it re ad ing t his c h a pt er.  T he reasonf o r t his,is  sothat re ader can easier fo l low  writer's arg ume ntat i o ntil l  c o ncl ud i ngc l osure and since  early sta rt . 
Beside rea d ing  t his cha pter, a lso r e ading t heoretica l framewo rk  and l imi tations of  study,is consid e red u s ef ul an d a lso be in g s ugges ted by the  writ er.

# #Reason ing s ch emas

Th e following reasoning s chemas , can  be  noted.
  1 .  In itially,havi ng in mind  Tu rke y's b eha v ior p atte r nine xerci sing its forei g npol i c yand in part i c u lar  rega rdi n g Turk ey's  reaction to EU's energy efficie ncya n d c lim a te c ha nge mitigation  po li c i es, in r ef erence to t hose ofco n troll ing th e grad ual tra n s it i on toRESdom ination t hro ug h  natura lga s  domin atio nin ene rgy mi x  – w h a t is shortly des cribe d by th e  ge neric  t erm "pi p es d iplomacy"– can be sa id tha t Tu rkeyhave ut il ized p eac ef ul means.S o Turkey' s rea ction i stheste ppingston e in co nnec ti ngforeign p o l ic y  o fo necoun try w it h th e particu l ar sub-g enr e  of ene rg y a n d  clima t ep o licies tha n h ave b e e n adoptedb y ot h er count ries;at lea st by p e ace fu l means .
2. Afterw ards, bys tud yi ng N . Korea' spara di gm,  i s illustrated t he factthat suc h linkag e b e twee n  forei gn  policy
 the_extent of_being affected by China's_energy efficiency_and_climate change_mitigation_policies – could_influence properties of_nuclear weapons development schedule;_namely planned time_allocation._The focused time frame of latter, would not be since the very early beginning_of_N. Korea's_nuclear_programme,_but rather since it was_principally manifested by Kim Jong-Un_(Mansourov, 2014)_with a stress to recent developments.

  2._How_could Turkey react,_when EU's transition to a new energy era –_as described by a RES dominated_energy-mix – or_even_earlier_when phasing out comes_to a point where Turkey's natural_gas transit services will not be_considered as strategic asset anymore. And more_precisely, whether EU's energy efficiency and_climate change mitigation policies could_likely contribute_(and in combination with other_factors) to Turkey's_reflection upon_nuclear weapons domestic_production.

But of course, before everything, all_the necessary infos_and terms on political realism and_how_these are being_adapted_into_the context_of this study_will_be provided;_so_that to make easier causation's comprehension_and_let readers to reach conclusions on their_own.

# How to be_read

He_who learns but does_not think, is lost! _
He who thinks but does not_learn is_in great_danger.  
(Confucius)

Before delving into study's inner core and answering title's_issue at stake, is crucial that_all readers should not_omit reading_this_chapter. The reason_for_this, is_so that reader can easier follow writer's_argumentation till_concluding closure and since early start.

Beside_reading this chapter, also_reading_theoretical framework and limitations of study,_is considered useful and also being_suggested by the writer.

## Reasoning_schemas

The_following_reasoning schemas, can be noted.

_ 1. Initially, having in mind_Turkey's behavior pattern_in exercising its foreign policy and in_particular_regarding Turkey's reaction to EU's energy_efficiency_and climate change mitigation policies, in_reference_to_those of controlling the gradual_transition to RES domination through natural_gas domination in energy mix – what is shortly_described by the_generic term "pipes diplomacy" –_can_be_said that Turkey have utilized peaceful means. So Turkey's reaction_is the_stepping stone in_connecting foreign policy of one country with the particular sub-genre_of energy and climate policies than have_been adopted by other countries; at least by peaceful means.

 _2. Afterwards, by studying N. Korea's paradigm, is_illustrated the fact that such linkage between_foreign policy