A(1) \cong R \times_{R/I} R, \ (a,i) \mapsto (a, a+i),$$ the fiber product of the two copies of the natural homomorphism $R \to R/I$. Hence, if $R$ is a reduced ring, then so is $A(1)$.

Let us note the following.

\[lemma 3.1\] Let $(R,\m)$ be a $($not necessarily Noetherian$)$ local ring. Assume that $I \ne R$ or $\alpha \in \m$. Then $A(\alpha)$ is a local ring with maximal ideal $\m \times I$.

Let $(a,x) \in A(\alpha) \setminus (\m \times I)$. Then, $a+\alpha x \not\in \m$, since $a \not\in \m$ but $\alpha x \in \m$. Therefore, setting $b = a^{-1}$ and $y = -(a+\alpha x)^{-1}{\cdot}xb$, we get $(a,x)(b,y)=1$ in $A(\alpha)$. Hence, $A(\alpha)$ is a local ring, because $\m \times I$ is an ideal of $A(\alpha)$.

When $I=R$, $A(-1)$ is not a local ring, even if $(R,\m)$ is a local ring. In fact, assume that $A(-1)$ is a local ring. Then, because $\m \times R$ is a maximal ideal of $A(-1)$ and $(1,1) \not\in \m \times R$, we have $(1,1)(b,y)= (1,0)$ for some $(b,y) \in A(-1)$, so that $b=1$ and $y+b + (-1){\cdot}1{\cdot}y=0$. This is absurd.

In what follows, let $(R,\m)$ be a one-dimensional Cohen-Macaulay local ring with a canonical fractional ideal $K$. We set $S=R[K]$ and ${\mathfrak{c}}= R:S$. Let $T$ be a birational module-finite extension of $R$ (hence $R \subseteq T \subseteq \overline{R}$), and assume that $K \subseteq T$ but $R \ne T$. We set $I = R:
A(1) \cong R \times_{R / I } R, \ (a, i) \mapsto (a, a+i),$$ the fiber product of the two copy of the lifelike homomorphism $ R \to R / I$. therefore, if $ R$ is a reduced band, then so is $ A(1)$. 

 Let us notice the pursuit. 

 \[lemma 3.1\ ] Let $ (R,\m)$ be a $ ($ not necessarily Noetherian$)$ local ring. Assume that $ I \ne R$ or $ \alpha \in \m$. Then $ A(\alpha)$ is a local band with maximal ideal $ \m \times I$. 

 Let $ (a, x) \in A(\alpha) \setminus (\m \times I)$. Then, $ a+\alpha x \not\in \m$, since $ a \not\in \m$ but $ \alpha x \in \m$. Therefore, setting $ boron = a^{-1}$ and $ y = -(a+\alpha x)^{-1}{\cdot}xb$, we get $ (a, x)(b, y)=1 $ in $ A(\alpha)$. Hence, $ A(\alpha)$ is a local ring, because $ \m \times I$ is an ideal of $ A(\alpha)$. 

 When $ I = R$, $ A(-1)$ is not a local ring, even if $ (R,\m)$ is a local ring. In fact, assume that $ A(-1)$ is a local hoop. Then, because $ \m \times R$ is a maximal ideal of $ A(-1)$ and $ (1,1) \not\in \m \times R$, we have $ (1,1)(b, y)= (1,0)$ for some $ (b, y) \in A(-1)$, so that $ b=1 $ and $ y+b + (-1){\cdot}1{\cdot}y=0$. This is absurd. 

 In what follows, let $ (R,\m)$ embody a one - dimensional Cohen - Macaulay local ring with a canonical fractional ideal $ K$. We set $ S = R[K]$ and $ { \mathfrak{c}}= roentgen: S$. Let $ T$ be a birational module - finite extension of $ R$ (hence $ R \subseteq deoxythymidine monophosphate \subseteq \overline{R}$), and assume that $ K \subseteq T$ but $ R \ne T$. We set $ I = R:
A(1) \clng R \times_{R/I} R, \ (a,i) \mapsuo (a, a+i),$$ the fiber producv of ths two cooies of the natural homomorpiism $R \to R/I$. Hence, if $R$ is a reauced rinh, then si is $Q(1)$.

Let us novs the followihn.

\[lemmc 3.1\] Let $(R,\m)$ be a $($npt necessasily Noetheriat$)$ uoeal ring. Assume that $I \ne R$ or $\alpha \in \m$. Tnej $A(\alpha)$ is a jocak rinf with maximal ideal $\m \times I$.

Let $(z,x) \in A(\elpha) \setminus (\k \times I)$. Then, $a+\alpha x \noh\in \l$, since $a \not\in \m$ hut $\alpha x \in \i$. Therefore, sdtting $b = a^{-1}$ and $y = -(a+\alkha x)^{-1}{\cdot}xb$, we get $(a,x)(b,y)=1$ in $A(\alphx)$. Henee, $A(\alpha)$ iw q llwal ring, berause $\i \times I$ is an idean of $A(\akpha)$.

When $I=R$, $A(-1)$ ls nov a oocal ring, even if $(R,\m)$ is a local ring. Ig fact, asvuje that $A(-1)$ is a loxao rinc. Than, bdxaure $\j \vimss R$ id a maximal iseal of $A(-1)$ abd $(1,1) \not\in \m \times R$, wq have $(1,1)(b,y)= (1,0)$ for some $(f,y) \in A(-1)$, so that $b=1$ and $y+b + (-1){\cdot}1{\cdot}y=0$. This ps agsurd.

In what follows, ler $(R,\m)$ be a one-dimensiojal Cohen-Iacaulay local ring with a canonical fractional igeal $I$. We sct $S=F[J]$ wnd ${\mathfrak{c}}= R:S$. Let $T$ be a birational module-sjnotv extension of $R$ (mence $R \subseteq T \skbxgteq \overline{R}$), and assuje that $K \subseteq T$ but $T \ne T$. We set $I = R:
A(1) \cong R \times_{R/I} R, \ (a,i) a+i),$$ fiber product the two copies \to Hence, if $R$ a reduced ring, so is $A(1)$. Let us note following. \[lemma 3.1\] Let $(R,\m)$ be a $($not necessarily Noetherian$)$ local ring. Assume $I \ne R$ or $\alpha \in \m$. Then $A(\alpha)$ is a local ring maximal $\m I$. $(a,x) \in A(\alpha) \setminus (\m \times I)$. Then, $a+\alpha x \not\in \m$, since $a \not\in \m$ $\alpha x \in \m$. Therefore, setting $b = and $y = -(a+\alpha we get $(a,x)(b,y)=1$ in $A(\alpha)$. $A(\alpha)$ a local because \times is an ideal $A(\alpha)$. When $I=R$, $A(-1)$ is not a local ring, even if $(R,\m)$ is a local ring. In assume that a local Then, $\m R$ is a of $A(-1)$ and $(1,1) \not\in \m have $(1,1)(b,y)= (1,0)$ for some $(b,y) \in A(-1)$, that $b=1$ $y+b + (-1){\cdot}1{\cdot}y=0$. This is absurd. what follows, let $(R,\m)$ be a one-dimensional Cohen-Macaulay ring with a canonical fractional ideal $K$. We set $S=R[K]$ and ${\mathfrak{c}}= R:S$. Let $T$ birational module-finite extension of (hence $R \subseteq \subseteq and that \subseteq T$ $R \ne T$. We set $I = R:
A(1) \cong R \times_{R/I} R, \ (a,i) \mapsto (a, a+i),$$ The fiber prOduct Of tHe tWo CopiEs of The natural homoMOrphIsm $R \to R/I$. Hence, if $R$ is a redUced rInG, Then SO iS $A(1)$.

Let Us note tHE fOLLowInG.

\[lEmmA 3.1\] LET $(R,\M)$ be a $($nOt nEcessarIly NoetherIan$)$ LoCal ring. AssumE ThAt $I \ne R$ or $\alPha \In \m$. Then $A(\alphA)$ is A local RiNg wITh maxImaL ideaL $\m \timeS i$.

Let $(a,x) \In A(\alpha) \sEtMInus (\m \tIMes I)$. TheN, $A+\AlPha x \Not\in \m$, since $a \not\in \M$ BuT $\Alpha x \in \m$. ThereFore, seTtINg $B = A^{-1}$ And $Y = -(a+\aLpha x)^{-1}{\cdot}xB$, wE get $(a,X)(B,y)=1$ in $A(\alPHa)$. hENCe, $A(\ALpha)$ is a local rIng, because $\m \TImeS I$ is an IdEal OF $A(\alphA)$.

When $i=R$, $a(-1)$ Is nOt a local rinG, eveN if $(R,\m)$ is a lOcal riNG. In fact, ASsume thAt $A(-1)$ is a LocAl rIng. THEn, BeCauSe $\M \TimES R$ Is a MAxiMal ideal Of $a(-1)$ aNd $(1,1) \not\In \m \tIMES r$, we hAve $(1,1)(B,y)= (1,0)$ foR some $(B,y) \in A(-1)$, so that $b=1$ aNd $y+B + (-1){\cdoT}1{\CdoT}y=0$. ThiS is abSurd.

in What fOllows, Let $(R,\m)$ Be A one-dimensional coheN-Macaulay LocAl RinG wIth a cANonicaL frActIonal idEal $K$. We sET $S=R[k]$ aND ${\MAtHfrak{c}}= R:S$. Let $T$ be a birAtIONaL module-fInite eXTeNsIOn of $R$ (henCe $r \suBsetEQ t \subsEteq \OVeRline{R}$), anD assumE ThAt $k \subsetEq t$ but $R \nE T$. we sEt $I = r:
A(1) \cong R \times_{R/I}R, \ (a,i)  \map sto  (a ,a+i) ,$$the fiber prod u ct o f the two copies of th e nat ur a l ho m om orphi sm $R \ t oR / I$.  H en ce,  i f  $ R$ is  areduced  ring, the n s ois $A(1)$.
L et  us note t hefollowing.
\[l emma 3 .1 \]L et $( R,\ m)$ b e a $( $ not ne cessarily  N o etheri a n$)$ lo c a lring . Assume that $I\ ne R$ or $\alpha\in \m $. Th e n  $A (\a lpha)$ isalocal ring wi t hm a x ima l  ideal $\m \t imes I$.

L e t $ (a,x)\i n A ( \alpha ) \se tm i nus  (\m \times  I)$ . Then, $ a+\alp h a x \no t \in \m$ , sinc e $ a \ not\ i n\m $ b ut $\a l ph a x \in  \m$. Th er ef ore,sett i n g $b =  a^ {-1} $ and  $y = -(a+\al pha  x)^ { -1} {\cdo t}xb$ , we  g et $( a,x)(b ,y)=1 $in $A(\alpha)$.  Hen ce, $A(\a lph a) $ i sa loc a l ring , b eca use $\m  \times I$is a n  i deal of $A(\alpha) $. Wh en $I=R$ , $A(- 1 )$  i s  not a l oc alring , evenif $ ( R, \m)$ isa loca l  r in g. In f ac t, ass um e t hat  $A(- 1 )$ i s a lo cal ring . The n , because $\m\ times R$ is a ma x i ma l  ide alof $A(-1)$and$ (1,1 ) \n o t\ in\ m \ti mes R $, we have $(1,1)(b,y)= ( 1, 0)$ fo r som e $(b,y) \inA(-1)$, so t h at $b=1$  and $y + b + (-1){\cdot }1{\c dot}y=0$.T his is a bsurd .

In wh at follow s ,  let $(R ,\m )$bea o n e -d imensional Co h e n-Ma ca ulay lo cal  ring w ith  acan oni ca l fractio nal idea l$K $.  W e s et $S = R[K]$ an d${\ ma thf rak{c } }= R:S $. Le t $T $be a b iration a lm o dule -f in iteext en sionof $ R $ ( hence $ R \subset eqT  \su bs et eq \ove rline{R}$), a nd  assume th at  $K  \subs e t eq T$ bu t $R \ne T$. We set $I=  R:
A(1) \cong_R \times_{R/I}_R, \ (a,i) \mapsto_(a, a+i),$$_the_fiber product_of_the two copies_of the natural_homomorphism $R \to R/I$._Hence, if $R$_is_a reduced ring, then so is $A(1)$.

Let us note the following.

\[lemma 3.1\] Let $(R,\m)$_be_a $($not_necessarily_Noetherian$)$_local ring. Assume that $I_\ne R$ or $\alpha \in_\m$. Then_$A(\alpha)$ is a local ring with maximal ideal_$\m_\times I$.

Let $(a,x)_\in A(\alpha) \setminus (\m \times I)$. Then, $a+\alpha x_\not\in \m$, since $a \not\in \m$_but $\alpha x_\in_\m$._Therefore, setting $b =_a^{-1}$ and $y = -(a+\alpha x)^{-1}{\cdot}xb$,_we get $(a,x)(b,y)=1$ in $A(\alpha)$. Hence,_$A(\alpha)$ is a local ring, because $\m_\times I$ is an ideal of_$A(\alpha)$.

When $I=R$, $A(-1)$ is not_a local_ring, even if $(R,\m)$ is_a local ring._In fact,_assume that $A(-1)$_is a local ring. Then, because_$\m \times R$_is a maximal ideal of $A(-1)$_and_$(1,1) \not\in \m_\times_R$,_we have_$(1,1)(b,y)= (1,0)$ for_some_$(b,y) \in_A(-1)$,_so that $b=1$ and $y+b +_(-1){\cdot}1{\cdot}y=0$._This is absurd.

In what follows, let $(R,\m)$_be a one-dimensional Cohen-Macaulay_local_ring with a canonical_fractional ideal $K$. We set_$S=R[K]$ and ${\mathfrak{c}}= R:S$. Let $T$_be a_birational module-finite_extension of $R$ (hence $R \subseteq T \subseteq \overline{R}$), and assume_that $K \subseteq T$ but $R_\ne T$. We set_$I =_R: