. Khveshchenko, Nucl. Phys. B 687 (2004) 323; Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 (2001) 246802.

E. V. Gorbar, V. P. Gusynin, V. A. Miransky, and I. A. Shovkovy, Phys. Rev. B 66 (2002) 045108.

T. Appelquist, D. Nash, and L. C. R. Wijewardhana, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60 (1988) 2575.

D. V. Khveshchenko, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 21 (2009) 075303.

E. C. Marino and L. H. C. M. Nunes, Nucl. Phys. B 741 (2006) 404.

M. Buballa, Phys. Rep. 407 (2005) 205.

C. Ratti and W. Weise, Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 054013.

B. Uchoa B and A. H. Castro Neto, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 (2007) 146801.

K. Fukushima and K. Iida, Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 054004.

L.-K. Lim et al., Eur. Phys. Lett. 88 (2009) 36001.
 ---
abstract: 'Chargaff’s second parity rule for short oligonucleotides states that the frequency of any short nucleotide sequence on a strand is approximately equal to the frequency of its reverse complement on the same strand. Recent studies have shown that, with the exception of organellar DNA, this parity rule generally holds for double stranded DNA genomes and fails to hold for single-stranded genomes. While Chargaff’s first parity rule is fully explained by the Watson-Crick pairing in the DNA double helix, a definitive explanation for the second parity rule has not yet been determined. In this work, we propose a model based on a hidden Markov process for approximating the distributional structure of primitive DNA sequences. Then, we use the model to provide another possible theoretical explanation for Chargaff’s second parity rule, and to predict novel distributional aspects of bacterial DNA sequences.'
author:
- |
    Marcelo Sobottka$^a$[^1] , Andrew G. Hart $^b$\
    \
    \

. Khveshchenko, Nucl. Phys. B 687 (2004) 323; Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 (2001) 246802. 

 E. V. Gorbar, V. P. Gusynin, V. A. Miransky, and I. A. Shovkovy, Phys. Rev. B 66 (2002) 045108. 

 T. Appelquist, D. Nash, and L. C. R. Wijewardhana, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60 (1988) 2575. 

 D. V. Khveshchenko, J. Phys. : Condens. Matter 21 (2009) 075303. 

 E. C. Marino and L. H. C. M. Nunes, Nucl. Phys. B 741 (2006) 404. 

 M. Buballa, Phys. Rep. 407 (2005) 205. 

 C. Ratti and W. Weise, Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 054013. 

 B. Uchoa B and A. H. Castro Neto, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 (2007) 146801. 

 K. Fukushima and K. Iida, Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 054004. 

 L.-K. Lim et al. , Eur. Phys. Lett. 88 (2009) 36001. 
  --- 
 abstract:' Chargaff ’s second parity rule for light oligonucleotides express that the frequency of any short nucleotide sequence on a strand is approximately adequate to the frequency of its reverse complement on the same strand. late study have shown that, with the exception of organellar DNA, this parity rule generally hold for double stranded deoxyribonucleic acid genomes and fails to hold for single - stranded genomes. While Chargaff ’s first parity bit rule is fully explained by the Watson - Crick match in the DNA double coil, a definitive explanation for the second parity bit rule has not yet been determined. In this work, we propose a model free-base on a hidden Markov process for approximating the distributional structure of primitive DNA sequences. Then, we use the model to provide another possible theoretical explanation for Chargaff ’s second parity rule, and to predict novel distributional aspects of bacterial DNA sequence.' 
 author: 
 - | 
     Marcelo Sobottka$^a$[^1 ]  , Andrew G. Hart $ ^b$\ 
     \ 
     \
. Khgeshchenko, Nucl. Phys. B 687 (2004) 323; Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 (2001) 246802.

E. V. Jorbar, B. P. Gusyvin, V. A. Miransky, and I. A. Shotkovt, Phyw. Rev. B 66 (2002) 045108.

T. Appelquist, D. Nash, ajd L. C. R. Wijtwardhana, Phys. Ret. Lett. 60 (1988) 2575.

D. V. Kgyeshckeiko, J. Phys.: Condgns. Matter 21 (2009) 075303.

E. C. Marino ang U. K. C. M. Nunes, Nucl. Phys. B 741 (2006) 404.

M. Buballa, [hys. Rel. 407 (2005) 205.

C. Ratti and R. Wepsq, Phgs. Rev. D 70 (2004) 054013.

B. Uchoa B and A. H. Castrk Neto, Khys. Rev. Lett. 98 (2007) 146801.

K. Gukushima and K. Iida, Phys. Gev. F 76 (2007) 054004.

L.-K. Lim et al., Ekr. Phys. Letj. 88 (2009) 36001.
 ---
qbstract: 'Chafgaff’s second parity role for short oligonucleotides sgates that the drwquftcy of any whort nucleotide sequence on a syrand is approwimatxly wqual to the frequencb of its reverse comklement on tke same strand. Recent srudiev haee sfiwn thzt, wjth thf eeception of organellar DNA, this parity ruke tenerally holss for djuble stranded DNA genomes and fails to homd for single-stranded gwnomes. While Chargaff’d first pwrity rule is fully explained by the Watson-Crick [airiig in tme DVQ fouble helix, a definitive explanation for the aevokd parity rule hcs not yet been cehetiined. In this work, cs lropose a model baded on w hideen Markod prpcess for approximating the distributioual structure of primntive DNA seduenves. Tnen, we use the model to probide anotheg possibls theoretical expuansthon for Chargaff’s second pwrity rulx, and to preaict novel distributlonal aspects of bacteriwl DNC seqgences.'
authlr:
- |
    Marcelo Sobottka$^a$[^1] , Andrew G. Hart $^b$\
    \
    \

. Khveshchenko, Nucl. Phys. B 687 (2004) Rev. 87 (2001) E. V. Gorbar, Miransky, I. A. Shovkovy, Rev. B 66 045108. T. Appelquist, D. Nash, and C. R. Wijewardhana, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60 (1988) 2575. D. V. Khveshchenko, J. Condens. Matter 21 (2009) 075303. E. C. Marino and L. H. C. M. Nucl. B (2006) M. Buballa, Phys. Rep. 407 (2005) 205. C. Ratti and W. Weise, Phys. Rev. D 70 054013. B. Uchoa B and A. H. Castro Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 146801. K. Fukushima and K. Phys. D 76 054004. Lim al., Eur. Phys. 88 (2009) 36001. --- abstract: 'Chargaff’s second parity rule for short oligonucleotides states that the frequency of short nucleotide a strand approximately to frequency of its on the same strand. Recent studies with the exception of organellar DNA, this parity generally holds double stranded DNA genomes and fails hold for single-stranded genomes. While Chargaff’s first parity is fully explained by the Watson-Crick pairing in the DNA double helix, a definitive explanation second parity rule has yet been determined. this we a based on hidden Markov process for approximating the distributional structure of primitive DNA Then, we use the model to provide another possible theoretical Chargaff’s parity rule, and predict novel distributional aspects bacterial sequences.' author: - | , G. \
. Khveshchenko, Nucl. Phys. B 687 (2004) 323; Phys. rev. Lett. 87 (2001) 246802.

E. V. GOrbar, v. P. GUsyNiN, V. A. MIranSky, and I. A. ShovkoVY, PhyS. Rev. B 66 (2002) 045108.

T. Appelquist, D. Nash, aNd L. C. R. wiJEwarDHaNa, PhyS. Rev. LetT. 60 (1988) 2575.

d. V. kHVesHcHeNko, j. PHYs.: condeNs. MAtter 21 (2009) 075303.

E. C. marino and L. h. C. M. nuNes, Nucl. Phys. B 741 (2006) 404.

m. buBalla, Phys. REp. 407 (2005) 205.

C. ratti and W. WeiSe, PHys. Rev. d 70 (2004) 054013.

B. uchOA B and a. H. CAstro neto, PhYS. Rev. LeTt. 98 (2007) 146801.

K. FukushImA And K. IiDA, Phys. ReV. d 76 (2007) 054004.

l.-K. lim eT al., Eur. Phys. Lett. 88 (2009) 36001.
 ---
absTRaCT: 'Chargaff’s secoNd pariTy RUlE FOr sHorT oligonuclEoTides STates thAT tHE FReqUEncy of any shorT nucleotide SEquEnce on A sTraND is appRoximAtELy eQual to the frEqueNcy of its rEverse COmplemeNT on the sAme strAnd. recEnt sTUdIeS haVe SHowN ThAt, wITh tHe exceptIoN oF orgaNellAR dna, thiS paRity Rule gEnerally holds For DoubLE stRandeD DNA gEnomEs And faIls to hOld foR sIngle-stranded geNomeS. While ChaRgaFf’S fiRsT pariTY rule iS fuLly ExplainEd by the wAtsOn-cRICk Pairing in the DNA douBlE HElIx, a definItive eXPlAnATion for tHe SecOnd pARIty ruLe haS NoT yet been DetermINeD. IN this woRk, We propOsE a mOdeL baseD On a hIdden MArkov proCess fOR approximating THe distributioNAl STRuCTure Of pRimitive DNA SequENces. then, WE uSe tHE modeL to prOvIDe ANother possible theorEtIcal exPlanaTion for ChargaFf’s second pARITy rule, anD to pREdICt novel distribUtionAl aspects oF BacteriaL DNA sEquences.'
Author:
- |
    MarCELo SobottKa$^a$[^1] , andRew g. HaRT $^B$\
    \
    \

. Khveshchenko, Nucl. Phys . B 687 (2 004)323 ; P hy s. R ev.Lett. 87 (2001 )  246 802.

E. V. Gorbar, V.  P. G us y nin, V.  A. M iransky ,  a n d  I.  A .Sho vk o vy , Phy s.Rev. B66 (2002)045 10 8.

T. Appel q ui st, D. Nas h,and L. C. R.  Wi jeward ha na, Phys.  Re v. Le tt. 60 (1988)  2575.

D .V . Khve s hchenko , J.  Phy s.: Condens. Matt e r2 1 (2009) 07530 3.

E.  C .  M a r ino  an d L. H. C.  M . Nun e s, Nucl .  P h y s . B 741 (2006) 40 4.

M. Buba l la,  Phys.  R ep. 407 (2 005)20 5 .
C. Ratti an d W.  Weise, P hys. R e v. D 70 (2004)054013 .
B.Ucho a  B  a ndA. H.C as tro Net o, Phys.  R ev . Let t. 9 8 ( 2 007)  14 6801 .

K.  Fukushima an d K . Ii d a,Phys.  Rev.  D 7 6(2007 ) 0540 04.
L. -K. Lim et al.,  Eur . Phys. L ett .88(2 009)3 6001. -- -
a bstract : 'Char g aff ’s s e co nd parity rule for  s h o rt  oligonu cleoti d es  s t ates tha tthe  fre q u encyof a n yshort nu cleoti d ese quenceon  a str an d i s a pprox i mate ly equ al to th e fre q uency of its r e verse complem e nt o nt he s ame  strand. Re cent stud iesh av e s h own t hat,wi t ht he exception of org an ellarDNA,this parity r ule genera l l y  holds f or d o ub l e stranded DNA  geno mes and fa i ls to ho ld fo r single -stranded g enomes.Whi leCha rga f f ’s  first parity r uleis  fullyexp lainedbythe  Wa tso n- Crick pai ring inth eDN Adou ble h e lix, a d ef ini ti veexpla n ationfor t he s ec on d  pa rity ru l eh a s no tye t be ende termi ned. Inthis wo rk, we pr opo s e amo de l based  on a hiddenMa rkov proce ss  fo r appr o x imatingthe distributional stru c ture of  pr imiti ve D NA sequen ces . Then , w e  use t he mod el to  p rov i d e ano t h er  po ss ible theor e t ica l exp la nati on forChargaff’s secondp ari ty rule, andtopred i c tnov e ld ist ri b uti o n al aspects of b acterial D NA se quences.'a uth or :
- |
   Marc elo S o bottka$ ^a$[^1] ,  Andrew G .Hart $ ^b$ \
    \
   \

. Khveshchenko,_Nucl. Phys._B 687 (2004) 323;_Phys. Rev._Lett._87 (2001)_246802.

E._V. Gorbar, V._P. Gusynin, V._A. Miransky, and I._A. Shovkovy, Phys._Rev._B 66 (2002) 045108.

T. Appelquist, D. Nash, and L. C. R. Wijewardhana, Phys. Rev._Lett._60 (1988)_2575.

D._V._Khveshchenko, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter_21 (2009) 075303.

E. C. Marino_and L._H. C. M. Nunes, Nucl. Phys. B 741_(2006)_404.

M. Buballa, Phys._Rep. 407 (2005) 205.

C. Ratti and W. Weise, Phys._Rev. D 70 (2004) 054013.

B. Uchoa_B and A._H._Castro_Neto, Phys. Rev. Lett._98 (2007) 146801.

K. Fukushima and K._Iida, Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007)_054004.

L.-K. Lim et al., Eur. Phys. Lett._88 (2009) 36001.
 ---
abstract: 'Chargaff’s second_parity rule for short oligonucleotides_states that_the frequency of any short_nucleotide sequence on_a strand_is approximately equal_to the frequency of its reverse_complement on the_same strand. Recent studies have shown_that,_with the exception_of_organellar_DNA, this_parity rule generally_holds_for double_stranded_DNA genomes and fails to hold_for_single-stranded genomes. While Chargaff’s first parity rule_is fully explained by_the_Watson-Crick pairing in the_DNA double helix, a definitive_explanation for the second parity rule_has not_yet been_determined. In this work, we propose a model based on a_hidden Markov process for approximating the_distributional structure of primitive_DNA sequences._Then,_we use the_model_to provide_another possible theoretical explanation for Chargaff’s second_parity rule,_and to predict novel distributional aspects_of bacterial DNA sequences.'
author:
-_|
_   Marcelo Sobottka$^a$[^1] , Andrew_G. Hart $^b$\
   _\
    \
