hardiman; @reif2]. Also, most traditional courses do not [*explicitly*]{} teach students effective problem solving strategies. Rather, they may reward inferior problem solving strategies in which many students engage. Instructors often implicitly assume that students know that the analysis, planning, evaluation, and reflection phases of problem solving are as important as the implementation phase. Consequently, they may not discuss these strategies explicitly while solving problems during the lecture. There is no mechanism in place to ensure that students make a conscious effort to interpret the concepts, make qualitative inferences from the quantitative problem solving tasks, or relate the new concepts to their prior knowledge.

In order to develop scientific reasoning by solving quantitative problems, students must learn to exploit problem solving as an opportunity for knowledge and skill acquisition. Thus, students should not treat quantitative problem solving merely as a mathematical exercise but as a learning opportunity and they should engage in effective problem solving strategies.

Effective Problem Solving Strategies
------------------------------------

Effective problem solving begins with a conceptual analysis of the problem, followed by planning of the problem solution, implementation and evaluation of the plan, and last but not least reflection upon the problem solving process. As the complexity of a physics problem increases, it becomes increasingly important to employ a systematic approach. In the qualitative or conceptual analysis stage, a student should draw a picture or a diagram and get a visual understanding of the problem. At this stage, a student should convert the problem to a representation that makes further analysis easier. After getting some sense of the situation, labeling all known and unknown numerical quantities is helpful in making reasonable physical assumptions. Making predictions about the solution is useful at this level of analysis and it can help to structure the decision making at the next stage. The prediction made at this stage can be compared with the problem solution in the reflection phase and can help repair, extend and organize the student’s knowledge structure. Planning or decision making about the applicable physics principles is the next problem solving heuristic. This is the stage where the student brings everything together to come up with a reasonable solution. If the student performed good qualitative analysis and planning, the implementation of the plan becomes easy if the student possesses the necessary algebraic manipulation and mathematical skills.

After implementation of the plan, a student must evaluate his/her solution, e.g., by checking the dimension or the order of magnitude, or by checking whether the initial prediction made during the initial analysis stage matches the actual solution. One can also ask whether the solution is sensible and, possibly, consistent with experience
hardiman; @reif2 ]. Also, most traditional courses do not [ * explicitly * ] { } teach students effective trouble clear strategies. Rather, they may honor deficient problem solving strategy in which many scholar engage. teacher frequently implicitly assume that scholar know that the analysis, planning, evaluation, and expression phase of problem solving are as important as the implementation phase. Consequently, they may not discourse these strategies explicitly while solving problems during the lecture. There exist no mechanism in place to ensure that students make a conscious attempt to interpret the concepts, make qualitative inferences from the quantitative problem clear tasks, or relate the new concepts to their prior knowledge. 

 In order to develop scientific reasoning by solving quantitative problems, students must learn to exploit problem solving as an opportunity for knowledge and skill acquisition. therefore, student should not treat quantitative trouble clear merely as a numerical exercise but as a learning opportunity and they should engage in effective problem solving strategies. 

 Effective Problem Solving Strategies 
 ------------------------------------ 

 Effective problem clear begins with a conceptual analysis of the problem, followed by planning of the problem solution, implementation and evaluation of the design, and last but not least reflection upon the problem solving process. As the complexity of a physics problem increase, it becomes increasingly important to employ a systematic approach. In the qualitative or conceptual psychoanalysis stage, a student should draw a picture or a diagram and get a visual understanding of the problem. At this stage, a scholar should convert the problem to a representation that makes further analysis easy. After getting some common sense of the situation, labeling all known and unknown numerical quantity is helpful in making reasonable forcible assumptions. Making predictions about the solution is useful at this level of analysis and it can help to structure the decision making at the next stage. The prediction made at this phase can be compared with the problem solution in the observation phase and can help repair, strain and organize the student ’s knowledge structure. Planning or decision making about the applicable physics principles is the next problem solve heuristic. This is the stagecoach where the scholar bring everything together to come up with a reasonable solution. If the student performed full qualitative analysis and planning, the implementation of the plan become easy if the student possesses the necessary algebraic manipulation and mathematical skill. 

 After implementation of the plan, a student must measure his / her solution, e.g., by checking the dimension or the order of magnitude, or by checking whether the initial prediction made during the initial analysis stage matches the actual solution. One can besides necessitate whether the solution is sensible and, possibly, consistent with experience
harfiman; @reif2]. Also, most traaitional courses do nov [*expliditly*]{} texch students effective problxm silvint strategies. Rather, thdy may reaard infwrioc problem solvinj stratennes ih whieh many students engage. Invtructors oftet km'licitly assume that students know trat the ajalysis, plannigg, enajuatjon, and reflection phases of problsm solvpng are as importsnt as the implementation ohasf. Consequently, thej may not duscufw these stragegies explicitly whilg solving problems during the lezture. There is bo mefvanism in poace no ensure thab studetts makr a conscious cfforv to interpret the concepvs, make qualitative ynferencev yrom the quantitative peoblek sonvine tarks, oc rslate hhe new concelts to theie prior knowledge.

In oweer to develol sciegtyfic reasoning by solving quantitative kroblsms, students must learn to exploit problem sllving as an opportunity for knowledge and skill acquisitimn. Thns, stbeents whluld not treat quantitative problem solving mqdeky as a mathematlcal exercise but ss a jearning oppottunity ans they should engahe in esfectuve probltm sokving strategies.

Effective Peoblem Solviug Wtrategies
------------------------------------

Effectivz problem souvinb begons with a conceptual aualysia of the prlblem, folmuwed by planning of tve problto solution, implemqntation end eraluatiov of the pjan, and ladt bub not least reflectlon ukon tha problem dolving process. As the complexivb of a physicx [rotlem incxeases, it becomes igcreasingly imkortant tj empuoy a systvmatic ap'roach. In thq qualitative lr conceptuan analysys srage, a studdvt should draw a picturv jr a diagram and get a virhal understandiuy if the problem. St ghif dtege, a vtudent shound cunvdtt thd problti bo x relresentation that manes rurther analysis essler. After getting some sense og the situation, lahelinj all ynown anq unknown numerical quantities is helpfkl ln making reafonanle khysical asxumptions. Making predictions about the wolution is useful at this level of auakysis and iv can relp to sdructure the decisiob making at the ntxt stage. The predictioh made at tjis stage can be compared with the problem solution in the reflection phawe and can help relair, extetd cnd orgwnizx vhe student’s knowkedge structure. Planning or decmsion makitg about the applicable physicx orinciples is the next problem solvinf heurisyic. This is the stage where the student brings everythikg togethwr to come lk wmth a reasonable solition. Nf the studenr pevformed good qjalotwtive anapysix cnd planning, the implementation od the plwn becomes easy mf the studekt possgsses thg necessary algebdaic lanipolation and mayhematical skikls.

After implementatpon of the plan, a atudent must evalocne his/her solntion, e.g., by whecking the dimension or the order of magnitude, or by checkjng whetmer the initial pteviction made during the lnitiwl analyris stage madches the actual solution. One can also ask xnethef tre somution is senvible and, possibly, consistent witf expwrience
hardiman; @reif2]. Also, most traditional courses do teach effective problem strategies. Rather, they strategies which many students Instructors often implicitly that students know that the analysis, evaluation, and reflection phases of problem solving are as important as the implementation Consequently, they may not discuss these strategies explicitly while solving problems during the There no in to ensure that students make a conscious effort to interpret the concepts, make qualitative inferences from quantitative problem solving tasks, or relate the new to their prior knowledge. order to develop scientific reasoning solving problems, students learn exploit solving as an for knowledge and skill acquisition. Thus, students should not treat quantitative problem solving merely as a mathematical but as opportunity and should in problem solving strategies. Solving Strategies ------------------------------------ Effective problem solving conceptual analysis of the problem, followed by planning the problem implementation and evaluation of the plan, last but not least reflection upon the problem process. As the complexity of a physics problem increases, it becomes increasingly important to employ approach. In the qualitative conceptual analysis stage, student draw picture a diagram get a visual understanding of the problem. At this stage, a should convert the problem to a representation that makes further After some sense of situation, labeling all known unknown quantities is helpful in physical Making solution useful this level of analysis it can help to structure decision making at the at this stage can be compared with the solution in the reflection phase and can repair, extend and organize the student’s knowledge structure. Planning or decision making the applicable is the next problem solving heuristic. This is stage where the student everything together to come up with a reasonable solution. the performed good analysis and planning, implementation of the becomes easy if possesses the algebraic and implementation of the plan, a student evaluate solution, e.g., by checking the or of magnitude, or by checking whether the initial prediction made during the initial analysis stage actual solution. One can ask the solution is sensible and, possibly, consistent with experience
hardiman; @reif2]. Also, most tradiTional courSes do Not [*ExpLiCitlY*]{} teaCh students effeCTive Problem solving strategiEs. RatHeR, They MAy RewarD inferiOR pROBleM sOlVinG sTRaTegieS in Which maNy students EngAgE. Instructors OFtEn implicitLy aSsume that stuDenTs know ThAt tHE analYsiS, planNing, evALuatioN, and refleCtIOn phasES of probLEM sOlviNg are as important aS ThE Implementation Phase. COnSEqUENtlY, thEy may not diScUss thESe stratEGiES EXplICitly while solVing problemS DurIng the LeCtuRE. There Is no mEcHAniSm in place to EnsuRe that stuDents mAKe a consCIous effOrt to iNteRprEt thE CoNcEptS, mAKe qUAlItaTIve InferencEs FrOm the QuanTITATive ProBlem SolviNg tasks, or relaTe tHe neW ConCepts To theIr prIoR knowLedge.

IN ordeR tO develop scientiFic rEasoning bY soLvIng QuAntitATive prOblEms, StudentS must leARn tO eXPLOiT problem solving as aN oPPOrTunity foR knowlEDgE aND skill acQuIsiTion. tHUs, stuDentS ShOuld not tReat quANtItAtive prObLem solViNg mEreLy as a MAtheMaticaL exercisE but aS A learning opporTUnity and they sHOuLD EnGAge iN efFective probLem sOLvinG strATeGieS.

effecTive PRoBLeM solving Strategies
------------------------------------

EfFeCtive pRobleM solving beginS with a concEPTUal analySis oF ThE Problem, followeD by plAnning of thE Problem sOlutiOn, implemEntation aND EvaluatiOn oF thE plAn, aND LaSt but not least REFlecTiOn upon tHe pRoblem sOlvIng ProCesS. AS the complExity of a PhYsIcS pRobLem inCReases, it BeComEs IncReasiNGly impOrtanT to eMpLoY A syStematiC ApPROach. in ThE quaLitAtIve or ConcEPtuAl analySis stage, a StuDEnt sHoUlD draw a pIcture or a diagRaM and get a viSuAl uNderstANDing of thE problem. At this stage, a stuDEnt shouLd cOnverT the Problem to A rePresenTatIOn that Makes fUrtheR aNalYSIs easIER. AFteR gEtting some SENse Of the SiTuatIon, labeLing all known and unkNOwn Numerical quanTitIes iS HElPfuL In MAkiNg REasONAble physical assUmptions. MaKiNG pRedictions ABouT tHe solutIon is usEful aT This levEl of analySis and it cAn Help TO StrUcture the dEcision mAking at thE Next sTAgE. The pRedIction MaDe aT this Stage cAN be CompaRed witH tHe probLem soLuTion in thE reflection phase and can hElp repAir, exTenD and organIze THe sTudent’s knOwleDge structuRe. PLanNing oR deCIsion MakiNG aBouT The apPlicABle physicS PrIncIPLeS is the next pROBLem SolviNg hEUristiC. ThiS is the stage where tHE student brings EverYTHinG toGEtheR tO come up with a reAsoNaBLE solutioN. IF the student PerformeD gOOd quaLitatiVe analYsis and PLAnNIng, the ImplEmeNtation of The PlAN becomeS eAsY If the sTudeNt PossesSes the NEcesSARy algebraic manipUlatiON And maTHemAticaL sKills.

AfTEr imPlementatiOn of the plan, A studeNt muSt evaLuate hiS/hEr soluTioN, e.G., by checkinG The dimensIon or The ordeR oF magNitUde, or bY cheCKIng whEtheR tHe iNitial preDICtIOn MaDE duRing The inItIal aNalysis stAGe matcheS thE Actual sOlUtiON. one can ALsO ASk whether tHe sOlutiON Is sensible ANd, poSSiBLy, conSistenT with eXperienCE
hardiman; @reif2]. Also, m ost tradit ional  co urs es  donot[*explicitly*] { } te ach students effective  prob le m  sol v in g str ategies .  R a t her ,th eyma y  r eward  in feriorproblem so lvi ng  strategiesi nwhich many  st udents engag e.Instru ct ors often  im plici tly as s ume th at studen ts know t h at thea n al ysis , planning, evalu a ti o n, and reflect ion ph as e so f  pr obl em solving  a re as importa n ta s the implementatio n phase. Co n seq uently ,the y  may n ot di sc u ssthese strat egie s explici tly wh i le solv i ng prob lems d uri ngthel ec tu re.  T h ere is  no mec hanism i npl ace t o en s u r e  tha t s tude nts m ake a conscio useffo r t t o int erpre t th econce pts, m ake q ua litative infere nces  from the  qu an tit at ive p r oblemsol vin g tasks , or re l ate  t h e ne w concepts to thei rp r io r knowle dge.
I nor d er to de ve lop  sci e n tific  rea s on ing by s olving qu an titativ eproble ms , s tud entsm ustlearnto explo it pr o blem solving a s  an opportuni t yf o rk nowl edg e and skill  acq u isit ion. Th us, stude nts s ho u ld not treat quantitat iv e prob lem s olving merely  as a math e m a tical ex erci s eb ut as a learni ng op portunitya nd theyshoul d engage  in effec t i ve probl emsol vin g s t r at egies.

Effec t i ve P ro blem So lvi ng Stra teg ies 
-- --- -- --------- -------- -- -- -- -- --- -

Ef f ective p ro ble msol vingb eginswitha co nc ep t ual  analys i so f  the  p ro blem , f ol lowed  byp lan ning of  the prob lem solu ti on , imple mentation and  e valuationof  th e plan , and last  but not least reflecti o n uponthe  prob lemsolving p roc ess. A s t h e comp lexity  of a  p hys i c s pro b l em  in cr eases, itb e com es in cr easi ngly im portant to employa  sy stematic appr oac h. I n th e q u al i tat iv e  or c onceptual analy sis stage,  a st udent shou l d d ra w a pic ture or  a di a gram an d get a v isual und er stan d i ngof the pro blem. At  this sta g e, as tu dentsho uld co nv ert  theproble m  to  a re presen ta tion t hat m ak es furth er analysis easier. Aft er get tingsom e sense o f t h e s ituation,  lab eling allkno wnand u nkn o wn nu meri c al  qu a ntiti es i s  helpfuli nmak i n greasonablep h y sic al as sum p tions.  Mak ing predictions a b out the soluti on i s use ful at t hi s level of ana lys is a nd it ca nhelp to str ucture t he decis ion ma king a t the n e x ts tage.Thepre diction m ade  a t  this s ta ge can be  com pa red wi th the prob l e m solution in th e ref l e ction pha se an dcan hel p  rep air, exten d and organ ize th e st udent ’s know le dge st ruc tu re. Planni n g or deci sionmakingab outthe  appli cabl e physi cs p ri nci ples is t h e  n e xt  p r obl em s olvin gheur istic. Th i s is the  st a ge wher ethe s tudent br i n gs everyth ing  toge t h er to come up w i th a rea sonabl e solu tion. I f  th estudent  pe r f ormed goo d qualita t ive  a naly sis andpl anni ng , t he  implementation  of theplan bec o m es eas y i f  the studen tpossesses th e nec es s ary alg e b rai c manip u lat ion  an d ma the mati c al skills.

After implem enta tiono f t he pl an, a  s tudent m u st e valuateh is/her soluti on, e.g., by ch e cki n g th e d i me ns ion or th e o r der o f ma gni tude , o r by c heck i ng w h et herthe in itia lpr edictionma de duri n g th e  in itia l ana ly si s  s tage ma tches th e act ua l solutio n . One c an a ls o ask whether  the solutio nis s ensibl e  an d,p o ssibly, cons istent wit h e xperience
hardiman; @reif2]._Also, most_traditional courses do not_[*explicitly*]{} teach_students_effective problem_solving_strategies. Rather, they_may reward inferior_problem solving strategies in_which many students_engage._Instructors often implicitly assume that students know that the analysis, planning, evaluation, and reflection_phases_of problem_solving_are_as important as the implementation_phase. Consequently, they may not_discuss these_strategies explicitly while solving problems during the lecture._There_is no mechanism_in place to ensure that students make a conscious_effort to interpret the concepts, make_qualitative inferences from_the_quantitative_problem solving tasks, or_relate the new concepts to their_prior knowledge.

In order to develop scientific_reasoning by solving quantitative problems, students must_learn to exploit problem solving as_an opportunity for knowledge and_skill acquisition._Thus, students should not treat_quantitative problem solving_merely as_a mathematical exercise_but as a learning opportunity and_they should engage_in effective problem solving strategies.

Effective Problem_Solving_Strategies
------------------------------------

Effective problem solving_begins_with_a conceptual_analysis of the_problem,_followed by_planning_of the problem solution, implementation and_evaluation_of the plan, and last but not_least reflection upon the_problem_solving process. As the_complexity of a physics problem_increases, it becomes increasingly important to_employ a_systematic approach._In the qualitative or conceptual analysis stage, a student should draw_a picture or a diagram and_get a visual understanding_of the_problem._At this stage,_a_student should_convert the problem to a representation that_makes further_analysis easier. After getting some sense_of the situation, labeling_all_known and unknown numerical quantities is_helpful in making reasonable physical assumptions._Making predictions about the solution_is_useful_at this level of analysis_and it can help to structure_the decision making_at the next stage. The prediction made_at_this stage can be compared with_the_problem solution in the reflection phase_and_can_help repair, extend and organize_the student’s knowledge structure. Planning or_decision making about the applicable physics principles is the_next problem solving_heuristic. This is the stage_where_the_student brings everything together to come up with a reasonable_solution. If_the student performed_good qualitative analysis and planning, the implementation of the plan_becomes easy if the student possesses the_necessary algebraic manipulation and mathematical skills.

After implementation of the plan, a_student must evaluate his/her solution, e.g., by checking_the dimension or the order of magnitude,_or by checking whether_the_initial prediction made during the initial analysis_stage_matches_the_actual solution. One_can also ask_whether the solution_is sensible_and, possibly, consistent_with experience