
{\ensuremath{\{z \in \C \,\colon |z| = 1\}}}$, and let ${\mathcal{L}}_1({\ensuremath{\mathbb{R}}})$ denote the class of all liftings of continuous circle maps of degree one. If $F\in
{\mathcal{L}}_1({\ensuremath{\mathbb{R}}})$, $\operatorname{Rot}(F)$ denotes the rotation set of $F$ and, by [@Ito], is a compact non empty interval.

To study the connection between the set of periods and the rotation interval, we need some additional notation. For all $c\le d$, we set $M(c,d):={\ensuremath{\{n \in \N \,\colon c < k/n < d \text{ for some integer $k$}\}}}$. Notice that we do not assume here that $k$ and $n$ are coprime. Obviously, $M(c,d)= \emptyset$ if and only if $c=d$. Given $\rho \in \R$ and $S \subset \N$, we set $$\Lambda(\rho, S) = \begin{cases}
    \emptyset        & \text{if $\rho \notin \Q$}, \\
    {\ensuremath{\{nq \,\colon q\in S\}}} & \text{if $\rho=k/n$ with $k$ and $n$ coprime}.
\end{cases}$$

The next theorem recalls Misiurewicz’s characterization of the sets of periods for degree $1$ circle maps (see [@Mis; @ALM]).

\[S9.5\] Let $F\in {\mathcal{L}}_1({\ensuremath{\mathbb{R}}})$, and let $\operatorname{Rot}(F) = [c,d]$. Then there exist numbers $s_c,s_d \in \N_{\Sho}$ such that $\operatorname{Per}(F)= \Lambda(c,\operatorname{S\mbox{\tiny\textup{sh}}}(s_c)) \cup M(c,d) \cup \Lambda(d,\operatorname{S\mbox{\tiny\textup{sh}}}(s_d))$. Conversely, for all $c,d \in \R$ with $c \le d$ and all $s_c, s_d\in\N_{\Sho}$, there exists a map $F \in {\mathcal{L}}_1
{ \ensuremath{\{z \in \C \,\colon |z| = 1\}}}$, and let $ { \mathcal{L}}_1({\ensuremath{\mathbb{R}}})$ denote the class of all liftings of continuous circle map of academic degree one. If $ F\in 
 { \mathcal{L}}_1({\ensuremath{\mathbb{R}}})$, $ \operatorname{Rot}(F)$ denotes the rotation set of $ F$ and, by [ @Ito ], is a compendious non empty interval. 

 To learn the connection between the set of period and the rotation interval, we need some extra note. For all $ c\le d$, we set $ M(c, d):={\ensuremath{\{n \in \N \,\colon c < k / n < d \text { for some integer $ k$}\}}}$. Notice that we do not wear here that $ k$ and $ n$ are coprime. Obviously, $ M(c, d)= \emptyset$ if and only if $ c = d$. give $ \rho \in \R$ and $ S \subset \N$, we set $ $ \Lambda(\rho, S) = \begin{cases } 
     \emptyset         & \text{if $ \rho \notin \Q$ }, \\ 
     { \ensuremath{\{nq \,\colon q\in S\ } } } & \text{if $ \rho = k / n$ with $ k$ and $ n$ coprime }. 
 \end{cases}$$ 

 The next theorem recalls Misiurewicz ’s word picture of the sets of periods for degree $ 1 $ r-2 maps (see [ @Mis; @ALM ]). 

 \[S9.5\ ] Let $ F\in { \mathcal{L}}_1({\ensuremath{\mathbb{R}}})$, and let $ \operatorname{Rot}(F) = [ degree centigrade, d]$. Then there exist numbers $ s_c, s_d \in \N_{\Sho}$ such that $ \operatorname{Per}(F)= \Lambda(c,\operatorname{S\mbox{\tiny\textup{sh}}}(s_c) ) \cup M(c, d) \cup \Lambda(d,\operatorname{S\mbox{\tiny\textup{sh}}}(s_d))$. Conversely, for all $ c, d \in \R$ with $ c \le d$ and all $ s_c, s_d\in\N_{\Sho}$, there exists a map $ F \in { \mathcal{L}}_1

{\enskremath{\{z \in \C \,\colon |z| = 1\}}}$, xnd let ${\mathcal{L}}_1({\ensurekath{\mafhbb{R}}})$ devote the class of all liftinjs od conupnuous circle maps of degree oje. If $F\ib
{\matical{L}}_1({\ensuremath{\mefhbb{R}}})$, $\oizratodkame{Rmv}(F)$ denotes the totation set of $F$ and, by [@Ido], id a compact non empty interval.

To sttdy the clnnection betwgen tnq sef of periods and the rotation intedval, we need some adcitional notation. For all $f\le f$, we set $M(c,d):={\ensurelath{\{n \in \N \,\xolog c < k/n < d \tebt{ for somt nnteger $k$}\}}}$. Nktice that we do not assume herd thac $k$ and $n$ atz cootime. Obviousoy, $M(c,q)= \emptyset$ in and otly if $v=d$. Given $\rho \ik \R$ aid $S \subset \N$, we set $$\Lambva(\rho, S) = \begin{cases}
    \emptysat        & \text{if $\ryo \notit \Q$}, \\
    {\dbsufemzti{\{nq \,\colon q\ii S\}}} & \text{if $\rho=k/n$ with $k$ and $n$ coprime}.
\end{vafvx}$$

The next thsorem wesalls Misiurewicz’s characterization of uhe ssts of periods for degrwe $1$ circle maps (see [@Mls; @ALM]).

\[S9.5\] Lqt $F\in {\mathcal{L}}_1({\ensuremath{\mathbb{R}}})$, and let $\operatortame{Rkg}(F) = [c,q]$. Rhfn there exist numbers $s_c,s_d \in \N_{\Sho}$ such that $\kptranorname{Per}(F)= \Lambdc(c,\operatorname{S\mnod{\togy\textup{sh}}}(s_c)) \zup M(c,b) \chp \Lambda(d,\operatorjame{S\mbjx{\tint\textup{sh}}}(f_d))$. Cpnversely, for all $c,d \in \R$ wuth $c \le d$ aud qll $s_c, s_d\in\N_{\Sho}$, thzre exists a map $F \in {\mathcal{L}}_1
{\ensuremath{\{z \in \C \,\colon |z| = 1\}}}$, ${\mathcal{L}}_1({\ensuremath{\mathbb{R}}})$ the class all liftings of one. $F\in {\mathcal{L}}_1({\ensuremath{\mathbb{R}}})$, $\operatorname{Rot}(F)$ the rotation set $F$ and, by [@Ito], is a non empty interval. To study the connection between the set of periods and rotation interval, we need some additional notation. For all $c\le d$, we set \in \,\colon < < d \text{ for some integer $k$}\}}}$. Notice that we do not assume here that $k$ $n$ are coprime. Obviously, $M(c,d)= \emptyset$ if and if $c=d$. Given $\rho \R$ and $S \subset \N$, set S) = \emptyset \text{if \notin \Q$}, \\ \,\colon q\in S\}}} & \text{if $\rho=k/n$ with $k$ and $n$ coprime}. \end{cases}$$ The next theorem recalls Misiurewicz’s of the periods for $1$ maps [@Mis; @ALM]). \[S9.5\] {\mathcal{L}}_1({\ensuremath{\mathbb{R}}})$, and let $\operatorname{Rot}(F) = [c,d]$. numbers $s_c,s_d \in \N_{\Sho}$ such that $\operatorname{Per}(F)= \Lambda(c,\operatorname{S\mbox{\tiny\textup{sh}}}(s_c)) M(c,d) \cup Conversely, for all $c,d \in \R$ $c \le d$ and all $s_c, s_d\in\N_{\Sho}$, there a map $F \in {\mathcal{L}}_1

{\ensuremath{\{z \in \C \,\colon |z| = 1\}}}$, and leT ${\mathcal{L}}_1({\eNsureMatH{\maThBb{R}}})$ dEnotE the class of all LIftiNgs of continuous circle mAps of DeGRee oNE. IF $F\in
{\mAthcal{L}}_1({\ENsUREmaTh{\MaThbB{R}}})$, $\OPeRatorNamE{Rot}(F)$ deNotes the roTatIoN set of $F$ and, by [@iTo], Is a compact Non Empty intervaL.

To Study tHe ConNEctioN beTween The set OF perioDs and the rOtATion inTErval, we NEEd Some Additional notatioN. foR All $c\le d$, we set $M(c,D):={\ensurEmATh{\{N \IN \N \,\cOloN c < k/n < d \text{ fOr Some iNTeger $k$}\}}}$. NOTiCE THat WE do not assume hEre that $k$ and $N$ Are CoprimE. OBviOUsly, $M(c,D)= \emptYsET$ if And only if $c=d$. giveN $\rho \in \R$ anD $S \subsET \N$, we set $$\lAmbda(\rhO, S) = \begiN{caSes}
    \EmptYSeT        & \tExt{If $\RHo \nOTiN \Q$}, \\
    {\eNSurEmath{\{nq \,\cOlOn Q\in S\}}} & \tExt{iF $\RHO=K/n$ wiTh $k$ And $n$ CopriMe}.
\end{cases}$$

The NexT theORem RecalLs MisIureWiCz’s chAracteRizatIoN of the sets of perIods For degree $1$ CirClE maPs (See [@MiS; @aLM]).

\[S9.5\] LeT $F\iN {\maThcal{L}}_1({\eNsuremaTH{\maThBB{r}}})$, AnD let $\operatorname{RoT}(F) = [C,D]$. thEn there eXist nuMBeRs $S_C,s_d \in \N_{\ShO}$ sUch That $\OPEratoRnamE{peR}(F)= \Lambda(C,\operaTOrNaMe{S\mbox{\TiNy\textUp{Sh}}}(s_C)) \cuP M(c,d) \cUP \LamBda(d,\opEratornaMe{S\mbOX{\tiny\textup{sh}}}(s_D))$. conversely, for ALl $C,D \In \r$ With $C \le D$ and all $s_c, s_d\In\N_{\SHO}$, theRe exIStS a mAP $F \in {\mAthcaL{L}}_1

{\ensuremath{\{z \in \C \ ,\colon |z | = 1 \}} }$,  a nd l et $ {\mathcal{L}}_ 1 ({\e nsuremath{\mathbb{R}}} )$ de no t e th e  c lassof alll if t i ngs  o fcon ti n uo us ci rcl e mapsof degreeone .If $F\in
{\m a th cal{L}}_1( {\e nsuremath{\m ath bb{R}} }) $,$ \oper ato rname {Rot}( F )$ den otes thero t ations et of $ F $  a nd,by [@Ito], is a c o mp a ct non empty i nterva l. 
T o stu dythe connec ti on be t ween th e  s e t ofp eriods and th e rotationi nte rval,we  ne e d some  addi ti o nal  notation.Forall $c\le  d$, w e  set $M ( c,d):={ \ensur ema th{ \{n\ in  \ N \ ,\ c olo n  c  <k /n< d \tex t{  f or so me i n t e g er $ k$} \}}} $. No tice that wedonota ssu me he re th at $ k$  and$n$ ar e cop ri me. Obviously,$M(c ,d)= \emp tys et $ i fand o n ly if$c= d$.  Given$\rho \ i n \ R$ a n d$S \subset \N$, we  s e t  $ $\Lambda (\rho, S)  = \begin{c as es} 
  \ empty set     & \t ext{if $\ rh o \noti n\Q$},\\ 
   { \ensu r emat h{\{nq  \,\colo n q\i n  S\}}} & \text { if $\rho=k/n$ wi t h  $ k $ an d $ n$ coprime} .
\e n d{ca ses} $ $
Th e  next  theo re m  r e calls Misiurewicz’s  c haract eriza tion of the s ets of per i o d s for de gree $1 $  circle maps ( see [ @Mis; @ALM ] ).

\[S9 .5\]Let $F\i n {\mathc a l {L}}_1({ \en sur ema th{ \ m at hbb{R}}})$, a n d  let  $ \operat orn ame{Rot }(F ) =  [c ,d] $.  Then the re exist  n um be rs  $s _c,s_ d  \in \N_ {\ Sho }$  su ch th a t $\op erato rnam e{ Pe r }(F )= \Lam b da ( c ,\op er at orna me{ S\ mbox{ \tin y \te xtup{sh }}}(s_c))  \c u p M( c, d)  \cup \ Lambda(d,\ope ra torname{S\ mb ox{ \tiny\ t e xtup{sh} }}(s_d))$. Conversely,f or all$c, d \in  \R$  with $c\le  d$ an d a l l $s_c , s_d\ in\N_ {\ Sho } $ , the r e  e xis ts  a map $F\ i n { \math ca l{L} }_1

{\ensuremath{\{z \in_\C \,\colon_|z| = 1\}}}$, and_let ${\mathcal{L}}_1({\ensuremath{\mathbb{R}}})$_denote_the class_of_all liftings of_continuous circle maps_of degree one. If_$F\in
{\mathcal{L}}_1({\ensuremath{\mathbb{R}}})$, $\operatorname{Rot}(F)$ denotes_the_rotation set of $F$ and, by [@Ito], is a compact non empty interval.

To study_the_connection between_the_set_of periods and the rotation_interval, we need some additional_notation. For_all $c\le d$, we set $M(c,d):={\ensuremath{\{n \in \N_\,\colon_c < k/n_< d \text{ for some integer $k$}\}}}$. Notice that_we do not assume here that_$k$ and $n$_are_coprime._Obviously, $M(c,d)= \emptyset$ if_and only if $c=d$. Given $\rho_\in \R$ and $S \subset \N$,_we set $$\Lambda(\rho, S) = \begin{cases}
 _  \emptyset   _    &_\text{if $\rho_\notin \Q$}, \\
  _ {\ensuremath{\{nq \,\colon_q\in S\}}}_& \text{if $\rho=k/n$_with $k$ and $n$ coprime}.
\end{cases}$$

The next_theorem recalls Misiurewicz’s_characterization of the sets of periods_for_degree $1$ circle_maps_(see_[@Mis; @ALM]).

\[S9.5\]_Let $F\in {\mathcal{L}}_1({\ensuremath{\mathbb{R}}})$,_and_let $\operatorname{Rot}(F)_=_[c,d]$. Then there exist numbers $s_c,s_d_\in_\N_{\Sho}$ such that $\operatorname{Per}(F)= \Lambda(c,\operatorname{S\mbox{\tiny\textup{sh}}}(s_c)) \cup M(c,d)_\cup \Lambda(d,\operatorname{S\mbox{\tiny\textup{sh}}}(s_d))$. Conversely, for_all_$c,d \in \R$ with_$c \le d$ and all_$s_c, s_d\in\N_{\Sho}$, there exists a map_$F \in_{\mathcal{L}}_1