 quark, for which $B_3(\tau_t,\tau_{t/Z})\approx B_1(\tau_{t/Z})\approx-0.024$ is very small. As in the case of the $a\to\gamma\gamma$ decay discussed in Section \[sec:agaga\], the main effect of electroweak radiative corrections would be to renormalize the gauge couplings. In the present case the coupling $\alpha$ associated with the photon is evaluated at $q^2=0$, while the coupling $\alpha(m_Z)/(s_w^2 c_w^2)$ associated with the $Z$ boson should be evaluated at $q^2=m_Z^2$ as indicated. The $Z\to\gamma a$ branching fraction is obtained by dividing this partial decay rate by the $Z$-boson total width $\Gamma_Z$. This yields $$\label{ZgaaBR}
   \mbox{Br}(Z\to\gamma a) = 8.17\cdot 10^{-4}\,\big| C_{\gamma Z}^{\rm eff} \big|^2
    \left( 1 - \frac{m_a^2}{m_Z^2} \right)^3 
    \left[ \frac{1\,\mbox{TeV}}{\Lambda} \right]^2.$$ By requiring the $Z$-boson total width to agree with the direct measurement $\Gamma_Z=(2.495\pm 0.0023)$GeV performed at LEP [@ALEPH:2005ab], an upper bound on the Wilson coefficient $|C_{\gamma Z}^{\rm eff}|$ can be extracted. At 95% CL we find $\mbox{Br}(Z\to\mbox{BSM})<0.0018$ and $$\label{eq:cZgammabound}
   \big| C_{\gamma Z}^{\rm eff} \big| < 1.48\,\bigg[ \frac{\Lambda}{1\,\mbox{TeV}} \bigg] \,.$$ This bound is obtained by neglecting the ALP mass and gets weaker when $m_a$ approaches the kinematic threshold at $m_a=m_Z$.

![\[fig:Zga\] Parameter space excluded by measurements of $\mbox{Br}(Z\to\gamma\gamma)$ and $\mbox{Br}(Z\to\gamma\gamma\gamma)$ (left) and measurements of $\mbox{Br}(Z\
quark, for which $ B_3(\tau_t,\tau_{t / Z})\approx B_1(\tau_{t / Z})\approx-0.024 $ is very small. As in the case of the $ a\to\gamma\gamma$ decay discussed in Section   \[sec: agaga\ ], the main consequence of electroweak radiative correction would be to renormalize the gauge couplings. In the present lawsuit the coupling $ \alpha$ associated with the photon is evaluate at $ q^2=0 $, while the yoke $ \alpha(m_Z)/(s_w^2 c_w^2)$ associated with the $ Z$ boson should be evaluated at $ q^2 = m_Z^2 $ as indicated. The $ Z\to\gamma a$ branching fraction is obtained by separate this partial decay rate by the $ Z$-boson sum width $ \Gamma_Z$. This give $ $ \label{ZgaaBR } 
    \mbox{Br}(Z\to\gamma a) = 8.17\cdot 10^{-4}\,\big| C_{\gamma Z}^{\rm eff } \big|^2 
     \left (1 - \frac{m_a^2}{m_Z^2 } \right)^3 
     \left [ \frac{1\,\mbox{TeV}}{\Lambda } \right]^2.$$ By requiring the $ Z$-boson total width to agree with the direct measurement $ \Gamma_Z=(2.495\pm 0.0023)$GeV performed at LEP [ @ALEPH:2005ab ], an upper oblige on the Wilson coefficient $ |C_{\gamma Z}^{\rm eff}|$ can be extracted. At 95% CL we find $ \mbox{Br}(Z\to\mbox{BSM})<0.0018 $ and $ $ \label{eq: cZgammabound } 
    \big| C_{\gamma Z}^{\rm eff } \big| < 1.48\,\bigg [ \frac{\Lambda}{1\,\mbox{TeV } } \bigg ] \,.$$ This adhere is obtained by neglecting the ALP mass and gets weak when $ m_a$ approaches the kinematic threshold at $ m_a = m_Z$. 

! [ \[fig: Zga\ ] Parameter space excluded by measurements of $ \mbox{Br}(Z\to\gamma\gamma)$ and $ \mbox{Br}(Z\to\gamma\gamma\gamma)$ (leftover) and measurements of $ \mbox{Br}(Z\
 quwrk, for which $B_3(\tau_t,\tau_{t/Z})\xpprox B_1(\tau_{t/Z})\apkrix-0.024$ is tery smzll. As iv the case of the $a\to\gamma\galmq$ decqy discussed in Sectiov \[sec:agaga\], the maib efhect of electrowxzk radiative dlrreetmons would be tp renormalhze the gauge wojppings. In the present case the couplyng $\alpna$ associated wijh tht protoh is evaluated at $q^2=0$, while the coupming $\alkha(m_Z)/(s_w^2 c_w^2)$ associayed with the $Z$ boson shoulf be evaluated at $q^2=m_Z^2$ ws indicatee. Thq $Z\to\gamma a$ cranching fraction is kbtained by dividing this partixl deeay rate by tye $X$-toson total widtr $\Gamma_Z$. This yields $$\label{ZbaaBR}
   \mbox{Br}(D\to\gakma a) = 8.17\cdot 10^{-4}\,\big| C_{\gamma Z}^{\cm eff} \big|^2
    \left( 1 - \frac{m_a^2}{m_Z^2} \rnght)^3 
    \left[ \frac{1\,\mboz{TwV}}{\Lamtda} \sighg]^2.$$ By resumrihg the $Z$-bkson total width to atree with the direcu mqqsurement $\Gamja_Z=(2.495\pm 0.0023)$DeD performed at LEP [@ALEPH:2005ab], an upper boutd kn the Wilson coefficiebt $|C_{\gamma Z}^{\rm eff}|$ can be extrasted. At 95% CL we find $\mbox{Br}(Z\to\mbox{BSM})<0.0018$ and $$\label{eq:cSgammebuunb}
   \bie| C_{\hamma Z}^{\rm eff} \big| < 1.48\,\bigg[ \frac{\Lambda}{1\,\mbox{TeV}} \bigd] \,.$$ Uhix bound is obtcined by neglectonh yre ALP mass avd gets wsaker when $m_a$ apprlaches jhe kibematic trresnold at $m_a=m_Z$.

![\[fig:Zga\] Parametee space excllded by measurements oy $\mbox{Br}(Z\to\gcmma\gakma)$ amd $\mbox{Br}(Z\to\gamma\gamma\gcmma)$ (lsft) and meadurements uf $\mbox{Br}(Z\
quark, for which $B_3(\tau_t,\tau_{t/Z})\approx B_1(\tau_{t/Z})\approx-0.024$ is very in case of $a\to\gamma\gamma$ decay discussed effect electroweak radiative corrections be to renormalize gauge couplings. In the present case coupling $\alpha$ associated with the photon is evaluated at $q^2=0$, while the coupling c_w^2)$ associated with the $Z$ boson should be evaluated at $q^2=m_Z^2$ as indicated. $Z\to\gamma branching is by dividing this partial decay rate by the $Z$-boson total width $\Gamma_Z$. This yields $$\label{ZgaaBR} \mbox{Br}(Z\to\gamma = 8.17\cdot 10^{-4}\,\big| C_{\gamma Z}^{\rm eff} \big|^2 \left( - \frac{m_a^2}{m_Z^2} \right)^3 \left[ \right]^2.$$ By requiring the $Z$-boson width agree with direct $\Gamma_Z=(2.495\pm performed at LEP an upper bound on the Wilson coefficient $|C_{\gamma Z}^{\rm eff}|$ can be extracted. At 95% CL we $\mbox{Br}(Z\to\mbox{BSM})<0.0018$ and C_{\gamma Z}^{\rm \big| 1.48\,\bigg[ \bigg] \,.$$ This obtained by neglecting the ALP mass when $m_a$ approaches the kinematic threshold at $m_a=m_Z$. Parameter space by measurements of $\mbox{Br}(Z\to\gamma\gamma)$ and $\mbox{Br}(Z\to\gamma\gamma\gamma)$ and measurements of $\mbox{Br}(Z\
 quark, for which $B_3(\tau_t,\tau_{t/Z})\apProx B_1(\tau_{t/Z})\ApproX-0.024$ is VerY sMall. as in The case of the $a\tO\GammA\gamma$ decay discussed in sectiOn \[SEc:agAGa\], The maIn effecT Of ELEctRoWeAk rAdIAtIve coRreCtions wOuld be to reNorMaLize the gauge COuPlings. In thE prEsent case the CouPling $\aLpHa$ aSSociaTed With tHe photON is evaLuated at $q^2=0$, WhILe the cOUpling $\aLPHa(M_Z)/(s_w^2 C_w^2)$ associated with tHE $Z$ BOson should be evAluateD aT $Q^2=m_z^2$ AS inDicAted. The $Z\to\GaMma a$ bRAnching FRaCTIOn iS Obtained by divIding this paRTiaL decay RaTe bY The $Z$-boSon toTaL WidTh $\Gamma_Z$. ThiS yieLds $$\label{ZGaaBR}
   \mBOx{Br}(Z\to\GAmma a) = 8.17\cdOt 10^{-4}\,\big| C_{\GamMa Z}^{\Rm efF} \BiG|^2
    \lEft( 1 - \FrAC{m_a^2}{M_z^2} \rIghT)^3 
    \LefT[ \frac{1\,\mboX{TEV}}{\lambdA} \rigHT]^2.$$ bY RequIriNg thE $Z$-bosOn total width tO agRee wITh tHe dirEct meAsurEmEnt $\GaMma_Z=(2.495\pm 0.0023)$geV peRfOrmed at LEP [@ALEPH:2005Ab], an Upper bounD on ThE WiLsOn coeFFicienT $|C_{\gAmmA Z}^{\rm eff}|$ Can be exTRacTeD. aT 95% cL We find $\mbox{Br}(Z\to\mboX{Bsm})<0.0018$ AnD $$\label{eq:CZgammABoUnD}
   \Big| C_{\gammA Z}^{\Rm eFf} \biG| < 1.48\,\BIgg[ \frAc{\LaMBdA}{1\,\mbox{TeV}} \Bigg] \,.$$ ThIS bOuNd is obtAiNed by nEgLecTinG the Alp masS and geTs weaker When $m_A$ Approaches the kINematic threshOLd AT $M_a=M_z$.

![\[fig:zga\] parameter spAce eXCludEd by MEaSurEMents Of $\mboX{BR}(z\tO\Gamma\gamma)$ and $\mbox{Br}(z\tO\gamma\Gamma\Gamma)$ (left) and mEasurementS OF $\Mbox{Br}(Z\
 quark, for which $B_3(\ta u_t,\tau_{ t/Z}) \ap pro xB_1( \tau _{t/Z})\approx - 0.02 4$ is very small. As i n the  c a se o f  t he $a \to\gam m a\ g a mma $de cay  d i sc ussed  in  Sectio n \[sec:ag aga \] , the main e f fe ct of elec tro weak radiati vecorrec ti ons would  be  to r enorma l ize th e gauge c ou p lings. In thep r es entcase the coupling $\ a lpha$ associat ed wit ht he p hot onis evaluat ed  at $ q ^2=0$,w hi l e the coupling $\al pha(m_Z)/(s _ w^2  c_w^2 )$  as s ociate d wit ht he$Z$ boson s houl d be eval uateda t $q^2= m _Z^2$ a s indi cat ed.  The $Z \t o\g am m a a $  b ran c hin g fracti on  i s obt aine d b y  div idi ng t his p artial decayrat e by the  $Z$- boson  tot al  widt h $\Ga mma_Z $.  This yields $$ \lab el{ZgaaBR }
 \mb ox {Br}( Z \to\ga mma  a)  = 8.17 \cdot 1 0 ^{- 4} \ , \ bi g| C_{\gamma Z}^{\ rm e ff } \big|^ 2
   \ le ft (  1 - \fr ac {m_ a^2} { m _Z^2}  \ri g ht )^3 
   \left [  \ fr ac{1\,\ mb ox{TeV }} {\L amb da} \ r ight ]^2.$$  By requ iring the $Z$-bosont otal width to ag r e ew iththe  direct mea sure m ent$\Ga m ma _Z= ( 2.495 \pm 0 .0 0 23 ) $GeV performed at L EP  [@ALE PH:20 05ab], an upp er bound o n t he Wilso n co e ff i cient $|C_{\ga mma Z }^{\rm eff } |$ can b e ext racted.At 95% CL w e find $ \mb ox{ Br} (Z\ t o \m box{BSM})<0.0 0 1 8$ a nd  $$\lab el{ eq:cZga mma bou nd} 
  \ big| C_{\ gamma Z} ^{ \r mef f}\big| < 1.48\, \b igg [\fr ac{\L a mbda}{ 1\,\m box{ Te V} }  \b igg] \, . $$ T hisbo un d is  ob ta inedby n e gle cting t he ALP ma ssa nd g et sweakerwhen $m_a$ ap pr oaches the  k ine matict h resholdat $m_a=m_Z$.

![\[fig: Z ga\] Pa ram eterspac e exclude d b y meas ure m ents o f $\mb ox{Br }( Z\t o \ gamma \ g am ma) $and $\mbox { B r}( Z\to\ ga mma\ gamma\g amma)$ (left) andm eas urements of $ \mb ox{B r } (Z \
 quark,_for which_$B_3(\tau_t,\tau_{t/Z})\approx B_1(\tau_{t/Z})\approx-0.024$ is very_small. As_in_the case_of_the $a\to\gamma\gamma$ decay_discussed in Section \[sec:agaga\],_the main effect of_electroweak radiative corrections_would_be to renormalize the gauge couplings. In the present case the coupling $\alpha$ associated_with_the photon_is_evaluated_at $q^2=0$, while the coupling_$\alpha(m_Z)/(s_w^2 c_w^2)$ associated with the_$Z$ boson_should be evaluated at $q^2=m_Z^2$ as indicated. The_$Z\to\gamma_a$ branching fraction_is obtained by dividing this partial decay rate by_the $Z$-boson total width $\Gamma_Z$. This_yields $$\label{ZgaaBR}
 __\mbox{Br}(Z\to\gamma_a) = 8.17\cdot 10^{-4}\,\big|_C_{\gamma Z}^{\rm eff} \big|^2
  _ \left( 1 - \frac{m_a^2}{m_Z^2} \right)^3_
    \left[ \frac{1\,\mbox{TeV}}{\Lambda} \right]^2.$$_By requiring the $Z$-boson total width_to agree with the direct_measurement $\Gamma_Z=(2.495\pm_0.0023)$GeV performed at LEP [@ALEPH:2005ab],_an upper bound_on the_Wilson coefficient $|C_{\gamma_Z}^{\rm eff}|$ can be extracted. At_95% CL we_find $\mbox{Br}(Z\to\mbox{BSM})<0.0018$ and $$\label{eq:cZgammabound}
  _\big|_C_{\gamma Z}^{\rm eff}_\big|_<_1.48\,\bigg[ \frac{\Lambda}{1\,\mbox{TeV}}_\bigg] \,.$$ This_bound_is obtained_by_neglecting the ALP mass and gets_weaker_when $m_a$ approaches the kinematic threshold at_$m_a=m_Z$.

![\[fig:Zga\] Parameter space excluded_by_measurements of $\mbox{Br}(Z\to\gamma\gamma)$ and_$\mbox{Br}(Z\to\gamma\gamma\gamma)$ (left) and measurements of_$\mbox{Br}(Z\