 (spin-orbit angle) is totally abnormal in (eclipsing) binary stars. The only exception I know of is that of DI Her [@Albrecht+09; @Albrecht+11], where the equatorial plane of both members of the binary are strongly tilted with respect to their orbital plane; though no definitive explanation has been given to such misalignment, it could be the consequence of a relatively recent and strong orbital perturbation in a triple system, an extreme case of the Lidov-Kozai mechanism [@Lidov62; @Kozai62], or due to the capture of the secondary star by the primary. In any case, a third component in the system is required, either in a very eccentric orbit or ejected from the system as a consequence of the dynamical perturbation. Indeed, in $\theta^1$OriA there is a third component (see below). [@Valle2011] also derived the effective temperature of the secondary star to be $T_{eff}=5850\pm250\,K$, much lower than any of the other previous estimates. This was done by measuring nine close pair line ratios sensitive to temperature, in two very high S/N spectra of the secondary star (obtained during minimum light in two eclipses), and comparing each of the same pair ratios in synthetic spectra created in the 5000-9000$K$ temperature range, with log g = 3.5 and solar abundances.

The third (hierarchical) companion in $\theta^1$OriA, located about 0.2north of the binary, was discovered by [@Petr+98] using holographic speckle interferometry in the $H$ and $K$ bands. In these bands, this star is about 1.4 magnitudes weaker than the out-of-eclipse, combined brightness of the binary components. As mentioned above, it is the highly variable (by at least a factor of 30) radio source that is frequently misidentified with the eclipsing binary; the physical process responsible for the radio emission and its large fluctuations has not been well established [for details, see @PetrMassi08]. The possibility that this third component is an interloper was ruled out very recently, when the [@GRAVITY+18] proved that this interferometric companion is gravitationally bound to the eclipsing binary. When in cross-correlation of some of our high S/N spectra taken inside the primary eclipse, with a G5V
(spin - orbit angle) is totally abnormal in (overshadow) binary star. The only exception I know of is that of DI Her [ @Albrecht+09; @Albrecht+11 ], where the equatorial plane of both member of the binary are strongly tilt with regard to their orbital plane; though no authoritative explanation has been give to such misalignment, it could be the consequence of a relatively recent and solid orbital perturbation in a triple organization, an extreme shell of the Lidov - Kozai mechanism [ @Lidov62; @Kozai62 ], or due to the capture of the secondary star by the primary. In any case, a third component in the arrangement is required, either in a very eccentric orbit or squirt from the system as a consequence of the dynamical perturbation. Indeed, in $ \theta^1$OriA there is a third part (see under). [ @Valle2011 ] also derived the effective temperature of the secondary asterisk to be $ T_{eff}=5850\pm250\,K$, much lower than any of the other previous estimates. This was done by measuring nine close pair line ratios sensitive to temperature, in two very high S / N spectra of the secondary star (obtained during minimum luminosity in two eclipses), and comparing each of the like couple ratios in synthetic spectra created in the 5000 - 9000$K$ temperature compass, with log g = 3.5 and solar abundances. 

 The third (hierarchical) companion in $ \theta^1$OriA, located about 0.2north of the binary, was discover by [ @Petr+98 ] using holographic speckle interferometry in the $ H$ and $ K$ bands. In these bands, this star is about 1.4 order of magnitude weaker than the out - of - eclipse, combined brightness of the binary components. As mention above, it is the highly variable (by at least a component of 30) radio source that is frequently misidentified with the eclipsing binary; the physical procedure responsible for the radio emission and its big fluctuations has not been well established [ for details, see @PetrMassi08 ]. The hypothesis that this third component is an interloper was ruled out very recently, when the [ @GRAVITY+18 ] proved that this interferometric companion is gravitationally bound to the overshadow binary. When in crisscross - correlation of some of our eminent S / N spectra taken inside the basal eclipse, with a G5V
 (spln-orbit angle) is totally abnormal in (eclipsing) binarg stars. Ghe only exception I know of iw thau of DI Her [@Albrechg+09; @Albrechn+11], where tye ewyatorial plane of njth jcmberv of the binary are stroncly tilted witv fedpect to their orbital plane; though no defonltive explanatyon nws bsvn given to such misalignment, if could be the conseauence of a relatively recfnt wnd strong orbital perturbatiin ig a triple syrtem, an exurzme case of the Lidov-Kozai mechanism [@Lidov62; @Kozan62], or due to tye fdpture of tie secjndary star nj the psimary. On any case, a bhird conponent in the system is required, eithet in a verf zccentric orbit or ejwcred ftom tve shwteo aa e cknsequfncx of the dyhamical perrurbation. Indeed, in $\trvya^1$OriA there is a ehyrd component (see below). [@Valle2011] also derined fhe effective temperatuee of the secondary sjar to be $E_{eff}=5850\pm250\,K$, much lower than any of the other previous estijxtew. Bhis qad done by measuring nine close pair line ratija xeksitive to tempevature, in two very hlgn S/N spectra ow the seckndary star (obtainfd durigg mibimum ligrt im two eclipses), and comparint each of thv sane pair ratios in dynthetic s'ectra creayed in the 5000-9000$K$ temperaturz rangs, with log h = 3.5 and skuar abundances.

Thd tmirg (hierarchical) companion ig $\theta^1$OrmA, loeated abuut 0.2morth jf the binwry, was discovered by [@Pehr+98] usnng hmlographic speckle interferometry in the $I$ and $K$ bands. It tvese banbs, thix star is abott 1.4 magnitudes weaker than the out-of-vclipse, cmmbined bridhtness of tha binary compmnents. Af mebtiobed aboxd, it is the hibhly varicyle (by at least a factor of 30) rxsio source that is frequently misodevtisivd xith eve eclipsing binxry; yhe pfysical progesr rexponsible for the ragio smission and its lsrne fluctuqtions hws not been wrll established [fog deteils, sxe @PettMafsi08]. The possibility that this fhird comooncnt is an intqrloier ras ruled put very recently, when the [@GRAVITY+18] provxd that this interferomwtric companion is yrsvitationalky botnd to tha eclipsing binary. Wyen in cross-correkation of some of our high V/N spfctra taken inside the primary eclipse, with a G5V
(spin-orbit angle) is totally abnormal in (eclipsing) The exception I of is that where equatorial plane of members of the are strongly tilted with respect to orbital plane; though no definitive explanation has been given to such misalignment, it be the consequence of a relatively recent and strong orbital perturbation in a system, extreme of Lidov-Kozai mechanism [@Lidov62; @Kozai62], or due to the capture of the secondary star by the primary. any case, a third component in the system required, either in a eccentric orbit or ejected from system a consequence the perturbation. in $\theta^1$OriA there a third component (see below). [@Valle2011] also derived the effective temperature of the secondary star to be much lower of the previous This done by measuring pair line ratios sensitive to temperature, high S/N spectra of the secondary star (obtained minimum light two eclipses), and comparing each of same pair ratios in synthetic spectra created in 5000-9000$K$ temperature range, with log g = 3.5 and solar abundances. The third (hierarchical) companion located about 0.2north of binary, was discovered [@Petr+98] holographic interferometry the $H$ $K$ bands. In these bands, this star is about 1.4 magnitudes than the out-of-eclipse, combined brightness of the binary components. As it the highly variable at least a factor 30) source that is frequently the binary; responsible the emission and its large has not been well established details, see @PetrMassi08]. The is an interloper was ruled out very recently, the [@GRAVITY+18] proved that this interferometric companion gravitationally bound to the eclipsing binary. When in cross-correlation of some of high S/N inside the primary eclipse, with a G5V
 (spin-orbit angle) is totally abNormal in (ecLipsiNg) bInaRy StarS. The Only exception I KNow oF is that of DI Her [@Albrecht+09; @albreChT+11], WherE ThE equaTorial pLAnE OF boTh MeMbeRs OF tHe binAry Are stroNgly tilted WitH rEspect to theiR OrBital plane; ThoUgh no definitIve ExplanAtIon HAs beeN giVen to Such miSAlignmEnt, it coulD bE The conSEquence OF A rElatIvely recent and strONg ORbital perturbaTion in A tRIpLE SysTem, An extreme cAsE of thE lidov-KoZAi MECHanISm [@Lidov62; @Kozai62], oR due to the caPTurE of the SeConDAry staR by thE pRImaRy. In any case, A thiRd componeNt in thE System iS RequireD, eitheR in A veRy ecCEnTrIc oRbIT or EJeCteD FroM the systEm As A consEqueNCE OF the DynAmicAl perTurbation. IndeEd, iN $\theTA^1$OrIA theRe is a ThirD cOmponEnt (see Below). [@vaLle2011] also derived tHe efFective teMpeRaTurE oF the sECondarY stAr tO be $T_{eff}=5850\Pm250\,K$, much LOweR tHAN AnY of the other previouS eSTImAtes. This Was donE By MeASuring niNe CloSe paIR Line rAtioS SeNsitive tO tempeRAtUrE, in two vErY high S/n sPecTra Of the SEconDary stAr (obtainEd durINg minimum light IN two eclipses), aND cOMPaRIng eAch Of the same paIr raTIos iN synTHeTic SPectrA creaTeD In THe 5000-9000$K$ temperature range, WiTh log g = 3.5 And soLar abundances.

the third (hiERARchical) cOmpaNIoN In $\theta^1$OriA, locAted aBout 0.2north oF The binarY, was dIscovereD by [@Petr+98] usING holograPhiC spEckLe iNTErFerometry in thE $h$ And $K$ BaNds. In thEse Bands, thIs sTar Is aBouT 1.4 mAgnitudes Weaker thAn ThE oUt-Of-eClipsE, Combined BrIghTnEss Of the BInary cOmponEnts. as MeNTioNed abovE, It IS The hIgHlY varIabLe (By at lEast A FacTor of 30) raDio source ThaT Is frEqUeNtly misIdentified witH tHe eclipsinG bInaRy; the pHYSical proCess responsible for the raDIo emissIon And itS larGe fluctuaTioNs has nOt bEEn well EstablIshed [FoR deTAIls, seE @pEtRMaSsI08]. The possibILIty That tHiS thiRd compoNent is an interloper WAs rUled out very reCenTly, wHEN tHe [@GraVitY+18] pRoVEd tHAT this interferomEtric compaNiON iS gravitatiONalLy Bound to The ecliPsing BInary. WhEn in cross-CorrelatiOn Of soME Of oUr high S/N spEctra takEn inside tHE primARy EclipSe, wIth a G5V
 (spin-orbit angle) is tot ally abnor mal i n ( ecl ip sing ) bi nary stars. Th e  onl y exception I know ofis th at of D I  H er [@ Albrech t +0 9 ;  @A lb re cht +1 1 ],  wher e t he equa torial pla neof  both member s  o f the bina ryare strongly  ti lted w it h r e spect  to  thei r orbi t al pla ne; thoug hn o defi n itive e x p la nati on has been given to such misalignm ent, i tc ou l d  be  th e conseque nc e ofa  relati v el y r ece n t and strongorbital per t urb ationin  at riplesyste m, anextreme cas e of  the Lido v-Koza i  mechan i sm [@Li dov62;  @K oza i62] ,  o rdue  t o  th e  c apt u reof the s ec on darystar b y thepri mary . Inany case, a t hir d co m pon ent i n the  sys te m isrequir ed, e it her in a very e ccen tric orbi t o reje ct ed fr o m thesys tem  as a c onseque n ceof t h edynamical perturba ti o n .Indeed,in $\t h et a^ 1 $OriA th er e i s at h ird c ompo n en t (see b elow). [@ Va lle2011 ]also d er ive d t he ef f ecti ve tem perature  of t h e secondary st a r to be $T_{e f f} = 5 85 0 \pm2 50\ ,K$, much l ower than  any of  th e  othe r pre vi o us estimates. This was  d one by  meas uring nine cl ose pair l i n e  ratiossens i ti v e to temperatu re, i n two very high S/N  spec tra of t he second a r y star ( obt ain eddur i n gminimum light i n tw oeclipse s),  and co mpa rin g e ach  o f the sam e pair r at io sin  sy nthet i c spectr acre at edin th e  5000- 9000$ K$ t em pe r atu re rang e ,w i th l og  g  = 3 .5an d sol ar a b und ances.
The thir d ( h iera rc hi cal) co mpanion in $\ th eta^1$OriA ,loc ated a b o ut 0.2no rth of the binary, wasd iscover edby [@ Petr +98] usin g h ologra phi c  speck le int erfer om etr y in th e $H $ a nd  $K$ bands . Inthese  b ands , thisstar is about 1.4m agn itudes weaker  th an t h e  o ut- o f- e cli ps e , c o m bined brightnes s of the b in a ry  component s . A smention ed abov e, it is thehighly va riable (b yat l e a sta factor o f 30) ra dio sourc e  that is  freq uen tly mi si den tifie d with the  ecli psingbi nary;the p hy sical pr ocess responsible for t he rad io em iss ion and i tsl arg e fluctua tion s has notbee n w ell e sta b lishe d [f o rdet a ils,see@ PetrMassi 0 8] . T h e  p ossibilityt h a t t his t hir d  compo nent  is an interloper was ruled outvery r ece ntl y , wh en  the [@GRAVITY +18 ]p r oved tha tthis interf erometri cc ompan ion is  gravi tationa l l yb ound t o th e e clipsingbin ar y . Whenin  c r oss-co rrel at ion of  someo f ou r high S/N spectra  take n insid e  th e pri ma ry ecli p se,with a G5V 
 (spin-orbit_angle) is_totally abnormal in (eclipsing)_binary stars._The_only exception_I_know of is_that of DI_Her [@Albrecht+09; @Albrecht+11], where_the equatorial plane_of_both members of the binary are strongly tilted with respect to their orbital plane;_though_no definitive_explanation_has_been given to such misalignment,_it could be the consequence_of a_relatively recent and strong orbital perturbation in a_triple_system, an extreme_case of the Lidov-Kozai mechanism [@Lidov62; @Kozai62], or due_to the capture of the secondary_star by the_primary._In_any case, a third_component in the system is required,_either in a very eccentric orbit_or ejected from the system as a_consequence of the dynamical perturbation. Indeed,_in $\theta^1$OriA there is a_third component_(see below). [@Valle2011] also derived_the effective temperature_of the_secondary star to_be $T_{eff}=5850\pm250\,K$, much lower than any_of the other_previous estimates. This was done by_measuring_nine close pair_line_ratios_sensitive to_temperature, in two_very_high S/N_spectra_of the secondary star (obtained during_minimum_light in two eclipses), and comparing each_of the same pair_ratios_in synthetic spectra created_in the 5000-9000$K$ temperature range,_with log g = 3.5 and_solar abundances.

The_third (hierarchical)_companion in $\theta^1$OriA, located about 0.2north of the binary, was discovered_by [@Petr+98] using holographic speckle interferometry_in the $H$ and_$K$ bands._In_these bands, this_star_is about_1.4 magnitudes weaker than the out-of-eclipse, combined_brightness of_the binary components. As mentioned above,_it is the highly_variable_(by at least a factor of_30) radio source that is frequently_misidentified with the eclipsing binary;_the_physical_process responsible for the radio_emission and its large fluctuations has_not been well_established [for details, see @PetrMassi08]. The possibility_that_this third component is an interloper_was_ruled out very recently, when the_[@GRAVITY+18]_proved_that this interferometric companion is_gravitationally bound to the eclipsing binary._When in cross-correlation of some of our high S/N_spectra taken inside_the primary eclipse, with a_G5V