 s \; 
[\partial_s^2 f(s) ]^2.\end{aligned}$$ Which verifies that the energy is constant in a model-independent manner. Furthermore if $f(s)$ is smooth and satisfies suitable falloff conditions at $s\to\pm\infty$ then the wavelet will be nonsingular and of finite energy.

To obtain a specific example it only remains to finish the complete specification of the potential $\psi(r,t)$. One particularly simple choice is to take one of the real scalar wavelets of the previous section $\psi\to\phi_{1,2}$, with $\zeta^a = ||\zeta|| \; V^a = a\;
V^a$. Since the electric and magnetic fields are now specified in terms of derivatives of a smooth bounded function, the electromagnetic field is similarly smooth and bounded. For the energy, write it in the form $${\mathcal E} =
{1\over3} \oint \d^3 x \left\{ 
\psi \; \partial_t^4 \psi - \partial_t\psi \; \partial_t^3 \psi
\right\}.$$ Whence, for either $\psi\to\phi_{1,2}$, an integration carried out at arbitrary $t$ yields the time-independent quantity $${\mathcal E}_{1,2} = {1\over2} \;{\phi_0^2\over a}.$$ The calculation has for convenience been carried out in the zero-momentum frame of the wavelet. In a general Lorentz frame we would have $$P^a_{1,2}  = {1\over2}\; {\phi_0^2\over a} \;\; V^a 
=  {1\over2}\; {\phi_0^2\over a^2} \;\; \zeta^a.$$ Thus this field configuration, as for the scalar case, is Lorentz covariant, bounded, finite energy and zero action. The vector nature of the Maxwell field has added technical complications, but there is no real change in basic principles.

In closing this section, I should mention one other wavelet that is particularly attractive. If one makes use of the pseudo-differential operator $(\nabla^2)^{-1/2}$ one could write $$\psi = (\nabla^2)^{-1/2} \; \phi_{1,2} = 
{1\over\Gamma(-1/2)} \int
s \; 
 [ \partial_s^2 f(s) ] ^2.\end{aligned}$$ Which verifies that the energy is constant in a model - autonomous manner. Furthermore if $ f(s)$ is legato and satisfies suitable falloff condition at $ s\to\pm\infty$ then the ripple will be nonsingular and of finite energy. 

 To obtain a specific example it merely remains to finish the accomplished specification of the potential $ \psi(r, t)$. One peculiarly simple choice is to take one of the real scalar ripple of the previous section $ \psi\to\phi_{1,2}$, with $ \zeta^a = ||\zeta|| \; V^a = a\; 
 V^a$. Since the electric and charismatic fields are nowadays stipulate in terms of derivatives of a smooth bounce function, the electromagnetic field is similarly smooth and bounded. For the department of energy, write it in the shape $ $ { \mathcal E } = 
 { 1\over3 } \oint \d^3 x \left\ { 
 \psi \; \partial_t^4 \psi - \partial_t\psi \; \partial_t^3 \psi 
 \right\}.$$ Whence, for either $ \psi\to\phi_{1,2}$, an integration carried out at arbitrary $ t$ yield the time - independent quantity $ $ { \mathcal E}_{1,2 } = { 1\over2 } \;{\phi_0 ^ 2\over a}.$$ The calculation has for convenience been carried out in the zero - momentum frame of the wavelet. In a general Lorentz frame we would have $ $ P^a_{1,2 }   = { 1\over2}\; { \phi_0 ^ 2\over a } \;\; V^a 
 =   { 1\over2}\; { \phi_0 ^ 2\over a^2 } \;\; \zeta^a.$$ Thus this field configuration, as for the scalar case, is Lorentz covariant, bounded, finite energy and zero action. The vector nature of the Maxwell battlefield has added technical complications, but there be no veridical change in basic principles. 

 In closing this incision, I should mention one other wavelet that is particularly attractive. If one lay down use of the pseudo - differential operator $ (\nabla^2)^{-1/2}$ one could write $ $ \psi = (\nabla^2)^{-1/2 } \; \phi_{1,2 } = 
 { 1\over\Gamma(-1/2) } \int
 s \; 
[\partial_s^2 f(s) ]^2.\end{aligned}$$ Dhich verifies jhqt the energg is conrtant in a model-independent labner. Durthermore if $f(s)$ is soooth and satisfiws snitable falloff rknditiokf at $d\to\pk\mnfty$ then the eavelet winl be nonsingunaf cnd of finite energy.

To obtain a specyfic exsmole it only reiainx to rpnlsh the complete specification or the pmtential $\psi(r,y)$. One particularly simple fhoife is to take one lf the real scajqr wavelets uf the prennous sectioh $\psi\to\phi_{1,2}$, with $\zeta^a = ||\zeta|| \; V^a = a\;
V^a$. Since the eoechtic and magnxtic fpelds are now specifiad in trrms of derivabives of a smooth bounded funrtion, the electromaggetic fiend is similarly smoity and boutded. Dor tht eierfy, wrihe mt in the fkrm $${\mathcal E} =
{1\over3} \oint \d^3 x \legt\{ 
\ixi \; \partial_t^4 \psi - \[awtial_t\psi \; \partial_t^3 \psi
\right\}.$$ Whence, for eifher $\psi\to\phi_{1,2}$, an integrqtion carried out at wrbitrary $t$ yields the time-independent quantity $${\mathcal E}_{1,2} = {1\over2} \;{\ohi_0^2\ivcr a}.$$ Rhf calculation has for convenience been carrieq oit in the zero-moientum framr lf jhe wavelet. In a genzdam Lorentz frame we would rave $$P^a_{1,2}  = {1\over2}\; {\phi_0^2\pver a} \;\; V^a 
=  {1\over2}\; {\phi_0^2\over a^2} \;\; \zeta^a.$$ Thus rhis field configuxation, as fox the xcalat case, is Lorentz covarnant, bkunded, finihe energy xnd zero action. Ghe vactor naujre of the Maxwelj field hes adbed techvicak compjications, hut tmare is no real chajge iu bashc princippes.

In closing this section, I should mention ome otver wavejet tmat is particulwrly attractivg. If one iakes use of thv pseudo-dmfferential jperator $(\nabld^2)^{-1/2}$ one could wcite $$\psi = (\naboa^2)^{-1/2} \; \phi_{1,2} = 
{1\ovdf\Gamma(-1/2)} \int
s \; [\partial_s^2 f(s) ]^2.\end{aligned}$$ Which verifies energy constant in model-independent manner. Furthermore satisfies falloff conditions at then the wavelet be nonsingular and of finite energy. obtain a specific example it only remains to finish the complete specification of potential $\psi(r,t)$. One particularly simple choice is to take one of the real wavelets the section with $\zeta^a = ||\zeta|| \; V^a = a\; V^a$. Since the electric and magnetic fields are specified in terms of derivatives of a smooth function, the electromagnetic field similarly smooth and bounded. For energy, it in form E} {1\over3} \oint \d^3 \left\{ \psi \; \partial_t^4 \psi - \partial_t\psi \; \partial_t^3 \psi \right\}.$$ Whence, for either $\psi\to\phi_{1,2}$, an integration out at yields the quantity E}_{1,2} {1\over2} \;{\phi_0^2\over a}.$$ has for convenience been carried out frame of the wavelet. In a general Lorentz we would $$P^a_{1,2} = {1\over2}\; {\phi_0^2\over a} \;\; = {1\over2}\; {\phi_0^2\over a^2} \;\; \zeta^a.$$ Thus this configuration, as for the scalar case, is Lorentz covariant, bounded, finite energy and zero action. nature of the Maxwell has added technical but is real in basic In closing this section, I should mention one other wavelet that particularly attractive. If one makes use of the pseudo-differential operator could $$\psi = (\nabla^2)^{-1/2} \phi_{1,2} = {1\over\Gamma(-1/2)} \int
 s \; 
[\partial_s^2 f(s) ]^2.\end{aligned}$$ WhicH verifies tHat thE enErgY iS conStanT in a model-indepENdenT manner. Furthermore if $f(s)$ Is smoOtH And sATiSfies SuitablE FaLLOff CoNdItiOnS At $S\to\pm\InfTy$ then tHe wavelet wIll Be Nonsingular aND oF finite eneRgy.

to obtain a speCifIc examPlE it ONly reMaiNs to fInish tHE complEte specifIcATion of THe potenTIAl $\Psi(r,T)$. One particularly sIMpLE choice is to takE one of ThE ReAL ScaLar Wavelets of ThE prevIOus sectIOn $\PSI\To\pHI_{1,2}$, with $\zeta^a = ||\zetA|| \; V^a = a\;
V^a$. Since THe eLectriC aNd mAGnetic FieldS aRE noW specified iN terMs of derivAtives OF a smootH Bounded FunctiOn, tHe eLectROmAgNetIc FIelD Is SimILarLy smooth AnD bOundeD. For THE ENergY, wrIte iT in thE form $${\mathcal E} =
{1\OveR3} \oinT \D^3 x \lEft\{ 
\psI \; \partIal_t^4 \PsI - \partIal_t\psI \; \partIaL_t^3 \psi
\right\}.$$ WhencE, for Either $\psi\To\pHi_{1,2}$, An iNtEgratIOn carrIed Out At arbitRary $t$ yiELds ThE TIMe-Independent quantitY $${\mATHcAl E}_{1,2} = {1\over2} \;{\pHi_0^2\over A}.$$ thE cALculatioN hAs fOr coNVEnienCe beEN cArried ouT in the ZErO-mOmentum FrAme of tHe WavEleT. In a gENeraL LorenTz frame wE woulD Have $$P^a_{1,2}  = {1\over2}\; {\phi_0^2\oVEr a} \;\; V^a 
=  {1\over2}\; {\phi_0^2\oVEr A^2} \;\; \ZEtA^A.$$ ThuS thIs field confIgurATion, As foR ThE scALar caSe, is LOrENtZ Covariant, bounded, finItE energY and zEro action. The vEctor naturE OF The MaxweLl fiELd HAs added technicAl comPlications, BUt there iS no reAl change In basic prINCiples.

In CloSinG thIs sECTiOn, I should mentION one OtHer waveLet That is pArtIcuLarLy aTtRactive. If One makes UsE oF tHe PseUdo-diFFerentiaL oPerAtOr $(\nAbla^2)^{-1/2}$ oNE could Write $$\Psi = (\nAbLa^2)^{-1/2} \; \PHi_{1,2} = 
{1\oVer\GammA(-1/2)} \InT
 s \; 
[\partial_s^2 f(s)]^2.\end{a ligne d}$ $ W hi ch v erif ies that the e n ergy  is constant in a mode l-ind ep e nden t  m anner . Furth e rm o r e i f$f (s) $i ssmoot h a nd sati sfies suit abl efalloff cond i ti ons at $s\ to\ pm\infty$ th enthe wa ve let willbenonsi ngular and of  finite e ne r gy.

T o  obtain a  s peci fic example it on l yr emains to fini sh the  c o mp l e tespe cification  o f the potenti a l$ \ p si( r ,t)$. One par ticularly s i mpl e choi ce  is to tak e one  o f  th e real scal ar w avelets o f thep revious section  $\psi \to \ph i_{1 , 2} $,  wi th $\z e ta ^a=  || \zeta||\;  V ^a =a\;V ^ a $ . Si nce  the  elec tric and magn eti c fi e lds  arenow s peci fi ed in  terms  of d er ivatives of a s moot h bounded  fu nc tio n,  thee lectro mag net ic fiel d is si m ila rl y s mo oth and bounded. F or t he  energy,  write it  i n  the for m$${ \mat h c al E}  =
{ 1 \o ver3} \o int \d ^ 3x\left\{  \psi \ ;\pa rti al_t^ 4  \ps i - \p artial_t \psi\ ; \partial_t^3 \psi
\right\} . $$ W he n ce,for  either $\p si\t o \phi _{1, 2 }$ , a n  inte grati on ca r ried out at arbitra ry  $t$ y ields  the time-ind ependent q u a n tity $${ \mat h ca l  E}_{1,2} = {1 \over 2} \;{\phi _ 0^2\over  a}.$ $ The ca lculation h as for c onv eni enc e b e e ncarried out i n theze ro-mome ntu m frame  of  th e w ave le t. In a g eneral L or en tz  f ram e wew ould hav e$$P ^a _{1 ,2} =  {1\ov er2}\ ; {\ ph i_ 0 ^2\ over a} \; \ ;  V^a  = {1\ ove r2 }\; { \phi _ 0^2 \over a ^2} \;\;\ze t a^a. $$  T hus thi s field confi gu ration, as  f orthe sc a l ar case,  is Lorentz covariant,b ounded,  fi niteener gy and ze roaction . T h e vect or nat ure o fthe M axwel l fi eld  h as added t e c hni cal c om plic ations,  but there is no r e alchange in bas icprin c i pl es. 
I n  cl os i ngt h is section, I s hould ment io n  o ne other w a vel et  that i s parti cular l y attra ctive. If  one make suseo f  th e pseudo-d ifferent ial opera t or $( \ na bla^2 )^{ -1/2}$  o necould  write $$\ psi =  (\nab la ^2)^{- 1/2}\;  \phi_{1 ,2} = 
{1\over\Gamma(-1 /2)} \ int
 s_\; 
[\partial_s^2_f(s) ]^2.\end{aligned}$$ Which verifies_that the_energy_is constant_in_a model-independent manner._Furthermore if $f(s)$_is smooth and satisfies_suitable falloff conditions_at_$s\to\pm\infty$ then the wavelet will be nonsingular and of finite energy.

To obtain a specific_example_it only_remains_to_finish the complete specification of_the potential $\psi(r,t)$. One particularly_simple choice_is to take one of the real scalar_wavelets_of the previous_section $\psi\to\phi_{1,2}$, with $\zeta^a = ||\zeta|| \; V^a =_a\;
V^a$. Since the electric and magnetic_fields are now_specified_in_terms of derivatives of_a smooth bounded function, the electromagnetic_field is similarly smooth and bounded._For the energy, write it in the_form $${\mathcal E} =
{1\over3} \oint \d^3_x \left\{ 
\psi \; \partial_t^4_\psi -_\partial_t\psi \; \partial_t^3 \psi
\right\}.$$ Whence,_for either $\psi\to\phi_{1,2}$,_an integration_carried out at_arbitrary $t$ yields the time-independent quantity_$${\mathcal E}_{1,2} =_{1\over2} \;{\phi_0^2\over a}.$$ The calculation has_for_convenience been carried_out_in_the zero-momentum_frame of the_wavelet._In a_general_Lorentz frame we would have $$P^a_{1,2}__= {1\over2}\; {\phi_0^2\over a} \;\; V^a 
=_ {1\over2}\; {\phi_0^2\over a^2}_\;\;_\zeta^a.$$ Thus this field_configuration, as for the scalar_case, is Lorentz covariant, bounded, finite_energy and_zero action._The vector nature of the Maxwell field has added technical complications,_but there is no real change_in basic principles.

In closing_this section,_I_should mention one_other_wavelet that_is particularly attractive. If one makes use_of the_pseudo-differential operator $(\nabla^2)^{-1/2}$ one could write_$$\psi = (\nabla^2)^{-1/2} \;_\phi_{1,2}_= 
{1\over\Gamma(-1/2)} \int