 momentum independent $\Delta_{k}=\Delta$ and $\Delta$ is determined by minimizing the ground state energy. We note that we are considering a band structure with isotropic dispersion and the electron and hole Fermi surfaces are perfectly nested. In this case, the exciton pairing gap $\Delta$ is always non-zero in the mean-field theory, although its value can be very small. In reality the mean-field gap will be destroyed by quantum fluctuations when it’s magnitude is small [@exction-cond2], but this is not reflected in a mean field theory. To capture this physics qualitatively, we assume that the transition from the exciton condensed state to the normal state occurs at $\Delta=10^{-5}\mu$. Although quantitatively unreliable, this procedure allows us to examine the effect of screening on the phase diagram semi-quantitatively as we shall see below.

With the above criteria, the phase diagram for different average particle-particle separation $r_{s}=\frac{1}{a_{B}}\sqrt{\frac{1}{\pi n}}$ ($n$ is particle/hole density; $a_{B}=\epsilon_{x}\hbar^{2}/m_{\text{eff}}e^{2}$ is the effective Bohr radius of electron-hole pair) and transition layer separation $b_{c}(r_{s})$ can be determined by solving the self-consistent equations and. We first consider EHBL with two screening layers. The result of calculation is depicted in Fig.\[fig:d-vs-rs\] for different separation between the electron/hole and its image charge $a$ (filled symbols).

![\[fig:d-vs-rs\] The phase diagram for EHBL with two- and one- screening layers for varied image charge separation $a$. $b$ is the bilayer separation and $r_{s}\sim\frac{1}{k_{F}}$ is the dimensionless average particle-particle separation in unit of the effective Bohr radius $a_{B}=\epsilon_{x}\hbar^{2}/m_{\text{eff}}e^{2}$. Below the transition lines $b_{c}(r_{s})$ an exciton gap $\Delta$ of magnitude larger than $10^{-5}\mu$ is formed.](d-vs-rs){width="1\columnwidth"}

In the small $r_{s}$ (high density) regime, kinetic energy dominates over potential energy and the exciton pairing gap goes to zero as $r_{s}\rightarrow0$.
momentum independent $ \Delta_{k}=\Delta$ and $ \Delta$ is determined by minimizing the ground department of state department of energy. We note that we are considering a isthmus social organization with isotropic dispersion and the electron and hole Fermi surfaces are perfectly nest. In this case, the exciton pairing opening $ \Delta$ is always non - zero in the mean - playing field theory, although its value can be very small. In world the mean - field gap will be destroyed by quantum fluctuations when it ’s magnitude is small [ @exction - cond2 ], but this is not reflect in a mean field theory. To appropriate this physics qualitatively, we assume that the transition from the exciton condensed state of matter to the normal state occurs at $ \Delta=10^{-5}\mu$. Although quantitatively unreliable, this procedure allows us to test the effect of screening on the phase diagram semi - quantitatively as we shall see below. 

 With the above criteria, the phase diagram for different average particle - particle separation $ r_{s}=\frac{1}{a_{B}}\sqrt{\frac{1}{\pi n}}$ ($ n$ is particle / hole density; $ a_{B}=\epsilon_{x}\hbar^{2}/m_{\text{eff}}e^{2}$ is the effective Bohr radius of electron - hole pair) and transition level interval $ b_{c}(r_{s})$ can be determined by clear the self - consistent equations and. We first consider EHBL with two cover layers. The resultant role of calculation is depicted in Fig.\[fig: d - vs - rs\ ] for different interval between the electron / hole and its image charge $ a$ (filled symbols). 

! [ \[fig: d - vs - rs\ ] The phase diagram for EHBL with two- and one- screening level for varied image charge separation $ a$. $ b$ is the bilayer separation and $ r_{s}\sim\frac{1}{k_{F}}$ is the dimensionless average particle - atom interval in unit of the effective Bohr radius $ a_{B}=\epsilon_{x}\hbar^{2}/m_{\text{eff}}e^{2}$. Below the transition lines $ b_{c}(r_{s})$ an exciton break $ \Delta$ of magnitude larger than $ 10^{-5}\mu$ is formed.](d - vs - rs){width="1\columnwidth " } 

 In the small $ r_{s}$ (eminent density) regime, kinetic energy dominates over likely energy and the exciton pairing gap goes to zero as $ r_{s}\rightarrow0$.
 molentum independent $\Delta_{y}=\Delta$ and $\Deltc$ is devermines by minkmizing the ground state enecgy. Qe nouv that we are considefing a bajd strucrure qith isotropic disizrsioh and vhe electron anc hole Ferki surfaces ara oexfectly nested. In this case, the excieon paitijg gap $\Delta$ if alewys hon-zero in the mean-field theory, alfhough pts value can be fery small. In reality the lean-vield gap will be festroyed bi quwbtum fluctuagions when it’s magnituse is small [@exction-cond2], but thir is uot reflectgb in d mean fielv theogy. To capture this phfsics qialitatively, wc assnme rhat the transition fcom the exciton condgnsed stata co the normal state oxcyrs aj $\Delda=10^{-5}\mu$. Qltfoufh qhantitwtitely unrelizble, this peocedure allows us uo qqsmine the efrect os fcreening on the phase diagram semi-quanuitatjvely as we shall see bwlow.

With the above crlteria, thq phase diagram for different average particle-pardicle repcvwguoj $r_{s}=\frac{1}{a_{B}}\sqrt{\frac{1}{\pi n}}$ ($n$ is particle/hole densyfy; $a_{N}=\epsilon_{x}\hbar^{2}/m_{\tewt{eff}}e^{2}$ is the effevtlvr Bohr radius uf eleefrkn-hole pair) and trwnsitiog laywr separauion $n_{c}(r_{s})$ can be determined by silving the svlf-cinsistent equationd and. We fixst comsidet EHBL with two screeniug laysrs. The resklt of camzulation is depiztec hn Fig.\[fig:d-vs-rs\] for differegt separavion yetween ghe glectrog/hole and lts image charge $a$ (fillef symyols).

![\[fhg:d-vs-rs\] Thf phase diagram for EHBL with txp- and one- scteetinc layers for yaried image chwrge separatiou $a$. $b$ is the cilayer seiaration end $r_{s}\sim\fras{1}{k_{F}}$ is the dikgnsionless avxrage pareiclw-parricle sdoaration in unot of the effective Bohr radius $a_{B}=\epsllon_{x}\fgar^{2}/m_{\text{eff}}e^{2}$. Beoow the transition lives $b_{b}(r_{s})$ ag exciton gap $\Delga$ ug magvitude largcr ghan $10^{-5}\mu$ is formed.](d-vs-rs){wigth="1\cklumnwidth"}

In the skajl $r_{s}$ (hith densiey) regime, kinrtic energy dominaues ovxr potxntial engrgy and the exciton pairing gal goes to zevo as $r_{s}\rightwrroq0$.
momentum independent $\Delta_{k}=\Delta$ and $\Delta$ is determined the state energy. note that we with dispersion and the and hole Fermi are perfectly nested. In this case, exciton pairing gap $\Delta$ is always non-zero in the mean-field theory, although its can be very small. In reality the mean-field gap will be destroyed by fluctuations it’s is [@exction-cond2], but this is not reflected in a mean field theory. To capture this physics qualitatively, assume that the transition from the exciton condensed to the normal state at $\Delta=10^{-5}\mu$. Although quantitatively unreliable, procedure us to the of on the phase semi-quantitatively as we shall see below. With the above criteria, the phase diagram for different average particle-particle $r_{s}=\frac{1}{a_{B}}\sqrt{\frac{1}{\pi n}}$ particle/hole density; is effective radius of electron-hole transition layer separation $b_{c}(r_{s})$ can be the self-consistent equations and. We first consider EHBL two screening The result of calculation is depicted Fig.\[fig:d-vs-rs\] for different separation between the electron/hole and image charge $a$ (filled symbols). ![\[fig:d-vs-rs\] The phase diagram for EHBL with two- and one- for varied image charge $a$. $b$ is bilayer and is dimensionless average separation in unit of the effective Bohr radius $a_{B}=\epsilon_{x}\hbar^{2}/m_{\text{eff}}e^{2}$. Below the lines $b_{c}(r_{s})$ an exciton gap $\Delta$ of magnitude larger than formed.](d-vs-rs){width="1\columnwidth"} the small $r_{s}$ density) regime, kinetic energy over energy and the exciton goes zero
 momentum independent $\Delta_{k}=\delta$ and $\DeLta$ is DetErmInEd by MiniMizing the grounD StatE energy. We note that we are ConsiDeRIng a BAnD struCture wiTH iSOTroPiC dIspErSIoN and tHe eLectron And hole FerMi sUrFaces are perfECtLy nested. In ThiS case, the exciTon PairinG gAp $\DELta$ is AlwAys noN-zero iN The meaN-field theOrY, AlthouGH its valUE CaN be vEry small. In reality THe MEan-field gap wilL be desTrOYeD BY quAntUm fluctuatIoNs wheN It’s magnITuDE IS smALl [@exction-cond2], But this is noT RefLected In A meAN field TheorY. TO CapTure this phySics QualitatiVely, we ASsume thAT the traNsitioN frOm tHe exCItOn ConDeNSed STaTe tO The Normal stAtE oCcurs At $\DeLTA=10^{-5}\MU$. AltHouGh quAntitAtively unreliAblE, thiS ProCedurE alloWs us To ExamiNe the eFfect Of Screening on the pHase Diagram seMi-qUaNtiTaTivelY As we shAll See Below.

WiTh the abOVe cRiTERIa, The phase diagram for DiFFErEnt averaGe partIClE-pARticle sePaRatIon $r_{S}=\FRac{1}{a_{B}}\Sqrt{\FRaC{1}{\pi n}}$ ($n$ is pArticlE/HoLe Density; $A_{B}=\EpsiloN_{x}\HbaR^{2}/m_{\tExt{efF}}E^{2}$ is tHe effeCtive BohR radiUS of electron-holE Pair) and transiTIoN LAyER sepAraTion $b_{c}(r_{s})$ can Be deTErmiNed bY SoLviNG the sElf-coNsIStENt equations and. We firSt ConsidEr EHBl with two screeNing layers. tHE Result of CalcULaTIon is depicted iN Fig.\[fIg:d-vs-rs\] for DIfferent SeparAtion betWeen the elECTron/hole And Its ImaGe cHARgE $a$ (filled symboLS).

![\[Fig:d-Vs-Rs\] The phAse Diagram For eHBl wiTh tWo- And one- scrEening laYeRs FoR vAriEd imaGE charge sEpAraTiOn $a$. $B$ is thE BilayeR sepaRatiOn AnD $R_{s}\sIm\frac{1}{k_{f}}$ Is THE dimEnSiOnleSs aVeRage pArtiCLe-pArticle SeparatioN in UNit oF tHe EffectiVe Bohr radius $a_{b}=\ePsilon_{x}\hbaR^{2}/m_{\TexT{eff}}e^{2}$. BELOw the traNsition lines $b_{c}(r_{s})$ an excitON gap $\DelTa$ oF magnItudE larger thAn $10^{-5}\mU$ is forMed.](D-Vs-rs){wiDth="1\colUmnwiDtH"}

In THE smalL $R_{S}$ (hIgh DeNsity) regimE, KIneTic enErGy doMinates Over potential energY And The exciton paiRinG gap GOEs To zERo AS $r_{s}\RiGHtaRROw0$.
 momentum independent $\De lta_{k}=\D elta$  an d $ \D elta $ is  determined by mini mizing the ground stat e ene rg y . We no te th at we a r ec o nsi de ri ngab an d str uct ure wit h isotropi c d is persion andt he  electronand  hole Fermisur facesar e p e rfect lyneste d. Int his ca se, the e xc i ton pa i ring ga p $\ Delt a$ is always non- z er o  in the mean-f ield t he o ry , alt hou gh its val ue  canb e verys ma l l .  In reality the m ean-field g a p w ill be  d est r oyed b y qua nt u m f luctuations  whe n it’s ma gnitud e  is sma l l [@exc tion-c ond 2],  but th is  is  n o t r e fl ect e d i n a mean  f ie ld th eory . T o  cap tur e th is ph ysics qualita tiv ely, weassum e tha t th etrans itionfromth e exciton conde nsed  state to  th enor ma l sta t e occu rsat$\Delta =10^{-5 } \mu $. A l th ough quantitativel yu n re liable,this p r oc ed u re allow susto e x a minethee ff ect of s creeni n gon  the ph as e diag ra m s emi -quan t itat ivelyas we sh all s e e below.

With the above cri t er i a ,t he p has e diagram f or d i ffer enta ve rag e  part icle- pa r ti c le separation $r_{s }= \frac{ 1}{a_ {B}}\sqrt{\fr ac{1}{\pin } } $ ($n$ i s pa r ti c le/hole densit y; $a _{B}=\epsi l on_{x}\h bar^{ 2}/m_{\t ext{eff}} e ^ {2}$ isthe  ef fec tiv e Bo hr radius ofe l ectr on -hole p air ) and t ran sit ion  la ye r separat ion $b_{ c} (r _{ s} )$can b e  determi ne d b ysol vingt he sel f-con sist en te qua tions a n d. W e fi rs tcons ide rEHBLwith two  screen ing layer s.T he r es ul t of ca lculation isde picted inFi g.\ [fig:d - v s-rs\] f or different separation between  th e ele ctro n/hole an d i ts ima gec harge$a$ (f illed  s ymb o l s).
! [ \[ fig :d -vs-rs\] T h e  ph ase d ia gram  for EH BL with two- and o n e-screening lay ers  for v ar ied im a gech a rge s eparation $a$.$b$ is the  b i la yer separa t ion  a nd $r_{ s}\sim\ frac{ 1 }{k_{F} }$ is the  dimensio nl essa v era ge particl e-partic le separa t ion i n  u nit o f t he eff ec tiv e Boh r radi u s $ a_{B} =\epsi lo n_{x}\ hbar^ {2 }/m_{\te xt{eff}}e^{2}$. Below t he tra nsiti onlines $b_ {c} ( r_{ s})$ an e xcit on gap $\D elt a$of ma gni t ude l arge r  t han $10^{ -5}\ m u$ is for m ed .]( d - vs -rs){width= " 1 \ col umnwi dth " }

Inthesmall $r_{s}$ (hi g h density) reg ime, k ine tic ener gy  dominates ove r p ot e n tial ene rg y and the e xciton p ai r ing g ap goe s to z ero as$ r _{ s }\righ tarr ow0 $.
 momentum_independent $\Delta_{k}=\Delta$_and $\Delta$ is determined_by minimizing_the_ground state_energy._We note that_we are considering_a band structure with_isotropic dispersion and_the_electron and hole Fermi surfaces are perfectly nested. In this case, the exciton pairing_gap_$\Delta$ is_always_non-zero_in the mean-field theory, although_its value can be very_small. In_reality the mean-field gap will be destroyed by_quantum_fluctuations when it’s_magnitude is small [@exction-cond2], but this is not reflected_in a mean field theory. To_capture this physics_qualitatively,_we_assume that the transition_from the exciton condensed state to_the normal state occurs at $\Delta=10^{-5}\mu$._Although quantitatively unreliable, this procedure allows us_to examine the effect of screening_on the phase diagram semi-quantitatively_as we_shall see below.

With the above_criteria, the phase_diagram for_different average particle-particle_separation $r_{s}=\frac{1}{a_{B}}\sqrt{\frac{1}{\pi n}}$ ($n$ is particle/hole_density; $a_{B}=\epsilon_{x}\hbar^{2}/m_{\text{eff}}e^{2}$ is_the effective Bohr radius of electron-hole_pair)_and transition layer_separation_$b_{c}(r_{s})$_can be_determined by solving_the_self-consistent equations_and._We first consider EHBL with two_screening_layers. The result of calculation is depicted_in Fig.\[fig:d-vs-rs\] for different_separation_between the electron/hole and_its image charge $a$ (filled_symbols).

![\[fig:d-vs-rs\] The phase diagram for EHBL_with two-_and one-_screening layers for varied image charge separation $a$. $b$ is the_bilayer separation and $r_{s}\sim\frac{1}{k_{F}}$ is the_dimensionless average particle-particle separation_in unit_of_the effective Bohr_radius_$a_{B}=\epsilon_{x}\hbar^{2}/m_{\text{eff}}e^{2}$. Below_the transition lines $b_{c}(r_{s})$ an exciton gap_$\Delta$ of_magnitude larger than $10^{-5}\mu$ is formed.](d-vs-rs){width="1\columnwidth"}

In_the small $r_{s}$ (high_density)_regime, kinetic energy dominates over potential_energy and the exciton pairing gap_goes to zero as $r_{s}\rightarrow0$.