}^{N}
g(\tau_n,\boldsymbol{a}_n)\boldsymbol{a}_n\boldsymbol{a}_n^T\end{aligned}$$ where $g(\tau_n,\boldsymbol{a}_n)$ is defined as $$\begin{aligned}
g(\tau_n,\boldsymbol{a}_n) \triangleq \frac {f_{w}^2
(\boldsymbol{a}_n^{T}\boldsymbol{h}-\tau_n)}
{F_{w}(\boldsymbol{a}_n^{T}\boldsymbol{h}-\tau_n)(1-F_{w}(\boldsymbol{a}_n^{T}\boldsymbol{h}-\tau_n))}
\label{g-function}\end{aligned}$$ in which $f_{w}(\cdot)$ denotes the probability density function (PDF) of $w_n$. Accordingly, the CRB matrix for the estimation problem (\[quantized-data-model-vector\]) is given by $$\begin{aligned}
\text{CRB}(\boldsymbol{h})=\boldsymbol{J}^{-1}(\boldsymbol{h}) =
\left( \sum_{n=1}^{N} g(\tau_n,\boldsymbol{a}_n) \boldsymbol{a}_n
\boldsymbol{a}_n^T \right)^{-1} \label{CRB}\end{aligned}$$

See Appendix \[appB\].

As is well known, the CRB places a lower bound on the estimation error of any unbiased estimator [@Kay93] and is asymptotically attained by the ML estimator. Specifically, the covariance matrix of any unbiased estimate satisfies: $\text{cov}(\hat{\boldsymbol{h}})-\text{CRB}(\boldsymbol{h})
\succeq \boldsymbol{0}$. Also, the variance of each component is bounded by the corresponding diagonal element of $\text{CRB}(\boldsymbol{h})$, i.e., $\text{var}(\hat{h}_i) \ge
[\text{CRB}(\boldsymbol{h})]_{ii}$.

We observe from (\[CRB\]) that the CRB matrix of $\boldsymbol{h}$ depends on the quantization thresholds $\boldsymbol{\tau}$ as well as the matrix $\boldsymbol{A}$ which is constructed from training sequences $\boldsymbol{X}$ (cf. (\[A-X-relationship\])). Naturally, we wish to optimize $\boldsymbol{\tau}$ and $\boldsymbol{A}$ (i.e. $\boldsymbol{X}$)
} ^{N } 
 g(\tau_n,\boldsymbol{a}_n)\boldsymbol{a}_n\boldsymbol{a}_n^T\end{aligned}$$ where $ g(\tau_n,\boldsymbol{a}_n)$ is defined as $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 g(\tau_n,\boldsymbol{a}_n) \triangleq \frac { f_{w}^2 
 (\boldsymbol{a}_n^{T}\boldsymbol{h}-\tau_n) } 
 { F_{w}(\boldsymbol{a}_n^{T}\boldsymbol{h}-\tau_n)(1 - F_{w}(\boldsymbol{a}_n^{T}\boldsymbol{h}-\tau_n) ) } 
 \label{g - function}\end{aligned}$$ in which $ f_{w}(\cdot)$ denotes the probability density function (PDF) of $ w_n$. consequently, the CRB matrix for the estimate problem (\[quantized - data - exemplar - vector\ ]) is yield by $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 \text{CRB}(\boldsymbol{h})=\boldsymbol{J}^{-1}(\boldsymbol{h }) = 
 \left (\sum_{n=1}^{N } g(\tau_n,\boldsymbol{a}_n) \boldsymbol{a}_n 
 \boldsymbol{a}_n^T \right)^{-1 } \label{CRB}\end{aligned}$$ 

 See Appendix \[appB\ ]. 

 As is well known, the CRB places a lower bind on the estimate error of any indifferent calculator [ @Kay93 ] and is asymptotically attained by the ML estimator. Specifically, the covariance matrix of any indifferent estimate satisfies: $ \text{cov}(\hat{\boldsymbol{h}})-\text{CRB}(\boldsymbol{h }) 
 \succeq \boldsymbol{0}$. Also, the discrepancy of each component is bounded by the corresponding diagonal element of $ \text{CRB}(\boldsymbol{h})$, i.e., $ \text{var}(\hat{h}_i) \ge 
 [ \text{CRB}(\boldsymbol{h})]_{ii}$. 

 We observe from (\[CRB\ ]) that the CRB matrix of $ \boldsymbol{h}$ depend on the quantization thresholds $ \boldsymbol{\tau}$ as well as the matrix $ \boldsymbol{A}$ which is constructed from prepare sequences $ \boldsymbol{X}$ (cf. (\[A - X - relationship\ ]) ). Naturally, we wish to optimize $ \boldsymbol{\tau}$ and $ \boldsymbol{A}$ (i.e. $ \boldsymbol{X}$ )
}^{N}
g(\twu_n,\boldsymbol{a}_n)\boldsymbou{a}_n\boldsymbol{a}_n^J\ebd{aligied}$$ whede $g(\tau_n,\coldsymbol{a}_n)$ is defined as $$\bxgin{qligntb}
g(\tau_n,\boldsymbol{a}_n) \tfiangleq \vrac {f_{w}^2
(\bildsbmbol{a}_n^{T}\boldsymbol{h}-\tau_n)}
{F_{w}(\boldsglbol{c}_n^{V}\boldsymbol{h}-\tau_k)(1-F_{w}(\boldsymbml{a}_n^{T}\boldsymbon{h}-\gab_n))}
\label{g-function}\end{aligned}$$ in which $s_{w}(\cdot)$ cejotes the probwbilptr dehsity function (PDF) of $w_n$. Accordingmy, the BRB matrix for thr estimation problem (\[quantlzed-fata-model-vector\]) is given by $$\bgfin{woigned}
\text{CRC}(\boldsymbol{h})=\boldsymbol{N}^{-1}(\boldsymbol{h}) =
\left( \sum_{n=1}^{N} g(\tau_n,\boudsymyol{a}_n) \boldsimgop{d}_n
\boldsymboo{a}_n^T \gight)^{-1} \label{CRN}\vnd{aligted}$$

See Sppendix \[appB\].

Ax iv wwll known, the CRB plares a lower bound on the estikacion error of any unbuawed evtimdtor [@Jay93] ans ms zsymptltirally attaihed by the NL estimator. Specifocwoly, the covarjance iaerix of any unbiased estimate satisfies: $\test{cov}(\hat{\boldsymbol{h}})-\text{XRB}(\boldsymbol{h})
\succeq \holdsymboj{0}$. Also, the variance of each component is bounded ty thx zorxcfoinfing diagonal element of $\text{CRB}(\boldsymbol{h})$, i.q., $\ttxt{nar}(\hat{h}_i) \ge
[\text{CRN}(\boldsymbol{h})]_{ii}$.

We onsfrfg from (\[CRB\]) thaj the CXG jatrix of $\boldsymbll{h}$ depgnds ob the quagtizstion thresholds $\boldsymbol{\rau}$ as well cs rhe matrix $\boldsymyol{A}$ which ir comstruvted from training sequznces $\goldsymbol{X}$ (cf. (\[A-X-relzgionship\])). Naturaluy, ee wish to optimize $\boldsymbjl{\tau}$ and $\bolbsymbol{A}$ (i.e. $\noldsyibol{X}$)
}^{N} g(\tau_n,\boldsymbol{a}_n)\boldsymbol{a}_n\boldsymbol{a}_n^T\end{aligned}$$ where $g(\tau_n,\boldsymbol{a}_n)$ is defined as \triangleq {f_{w}^2 (\boldsymbol{a}_n^{T}\boldsymbol{h}-\tau_n)} \label{g-function}\end{aligned}$$ in which function of $w_n$. Accordingly, CRB matrix for estimation problem (\[quantized-data-model-vector\]) is given by \text{CRB}(\boldsymbol{h})=\boldsymbol{J}^{-1}(\boldsymbol{h}) = \left( \sum_{n=1}^{N} g(\tau_n,\boldsymbol{a}_n) \boldsymbol{a}_n \boldsymbol{a}_n^T \right)^{-1} \label{CRB}\end{aligned}$$ See Appendix \[appB\]. As well known, the CRB places a lower bound on the estimation error of unbiased [@Kay93] is attained by the ML estimator. Specifically, the covariance matrix of any unbiased estimate satisfies: $\text{cov}(\hat{\boldsymbol{h}})-\text{CRB}(\boldsymbol{h}) \succeq Also, the variance of each component is bounded the corresponding diagonal element $\text{CRB}(\boldsymbol{h})$, i.e., $\text{var}(\hat{h}_i) \ge [\text{CRB}(\boldsymbol{h})]_{ii}$. observe (\[CRB\]) that CRB of depends on the thresholds $\boldsymbol{\tau}$ as well as the matrix $\boldsymbol{A}$ which is constructed from training sequences $\boldsymbol{X}$ (cf. (\[A-X-relationship\])). we wish $\boldsymbol{\tau}$ and (i.e.
}^{N}
g(\tau_n,\boldsymbol{a}_n)\boldsymBol{a}_n\boldsYmbol{A}_n^T\End{AlIgneD}$$ wheRe $g(\tau_n,\boldsymBOl{a}_n)$ Is defined as $$\begin{aligneD}
g(\tau_N,\bOLdsyMBoL{a}_n) \trIangleq \FRaC {F_{W}^2
(\boLdSyMboL{a}_N^{t}\bOldsyMboL{h}-\tau_n)}
{F_{W}(\boldsymboL{a}_n^{t}\bOldsymbol{h}-\taU_N)(1-F_{W}(\boldsymboL{a}_n^{t}\boldsymbol{h}-\Tau_N))}
\label{G-fUncTIon}\enD{alIgned}$$ In whicH $F_{w}(\cdot)$ Denotes thE pRObabilITy densiTY FuNctiOn (PDF) of $w_n$. AccordinGLy, THe CRB matrix for The estImATiON ProBleM (\[quantized-DaTa-modEL-vector\]) IS gIVEN by $$\BEgin{aligned}
\teXt{CRB}(\boldsyMBol{H})=\boldsYmBol{j}^{-1}(\BoldsyMbol{h}) =
\LeFT( \suM_{n=1}^{N} g(\tau_n,\bolDsymBol{a}_n) \boldSymbol{A}_N
\boldsyMBol{a}_n^T \rIght)^{-1} \laBel{cRB}\End{aLIgNeD}$$

SeE APPenDIx \[Appb\].

as iS well knoWn, ThE CRB pLaceS A LOWer bOunD on tHe estImation error oF anY unbIAseD estiMator [@kay93] aNd Is asyMptotiCally AtTained by the ML esTimaTor. SpecifIcaLlY, thE cOvariANce matRix Of aNy unbiaSed estiMAte SaTISFiEs: $\text{cov}(\hat{\boldsyMbOL{H}})-\tExt{CRB}(\boLdsymbOL{h})
\SuCCeq \boldsYmBol{0}$. also, THE variAnce OF eAch compoNent is BOuNdEd by the CoRrespoNdIng DiaGonal ELemeNt of $\teXt{CRB}(\bolDsymbOL{h})$, i.e., $\text{var}(\hat{H}_I) \ge
[\text{CRB}(\bolDSyMBOl{H})]_{Ii}$.

We ObsErve from (\[CRB\]) That THe CRb matRIx Of $\bOLdsymBol{h}$ dEpENdS On the quantization thReSholds $\BoldsYmbol{\tau}$ as welL as the matrIX $\BOldsymboL{A}$ whICh IS constructed frOm traIning sequeNCes $\boldsYmbol{x}$ (cf. (\[A-X-relAtionship\])). nATurally, wE wiSh tO opTimIZE $\bOldsymbol{\tau}$ aND $\BoldSyMbol{A}$ (i.e. $\BolDsymbol{x}$)
}^{N}
g(\tau_n,\boldsymbol {a}_n)\bol dsymb ol{ a}_ n\ bold symb ol{a}_n^T\end{ a lign ed}$$ where $g(\tau_n, \bold sy m bol{ a }_ n)$ i s defin e da s  $$ \b eg in{ al i gn ed}
g (\t au_n,\b oldsymbol{ a}_ n)  \triangleq\ fr ac {f_{w}^ 2
( \boldsymbol{ a}_ n^{T}\ bo lds y mbol{ h}- \tau_ n)}
{F _ {w}(\b oldsymbol {a } _n^{T} \ boldsym b o l{ h}-\ tau_n)(1-F_{w}(\b o ld s ymbol{a}_n^{T} \bolds ym b ol { h }-\ tau _n))}
\lab el {g-fu n ction}\ e nd { a l ign e d}$$ in which  $f_{w}(\cd o t)$  denot es  th e  proba bilit yd ens ity functio n (P DF) of $w _n$. A c cording l y, theCRB ma tri x f or t h ees tim at i onp ro ble m  (\ [quantiz ed -d ata-m odel - v e c tor\ ])is g ivenby $$\begin{a lig ned} \te xt{CR B}(\b olds ym bol{h })=\bo ldsym bo l{J}^{-1}(\bold symb ol{h}) =\le ft ( \ su m_{n= 1 }^{N}g(\ tau _n,\bol dsymbol { a}_ n) \ b ol dsymbol{a}_n
\bold sy m b ol {a}_n^T\right ) ^{ -1 }  \label{ CR B}\ end{ a l igned }$$Se e Append ix \[a p pB \] .

As i swell k no wn,  th e CRB plac es a l ower bou nd on the estimation error of anyu nb i a se d  est ima tor [@Kay93 ] an d  isasym p to tic a lly a ttain ed by the ML estimator. S pe cifica lly,the covarianc e matrix o f a ny unbia sede st i mate satisfies : $\t ext{cov}(\ h at{\bold symbo l{h}})-\ text{CRB} ( \ boldsymb ol{ h}) 
\s ucc e q  \ boldsymbol{0} $ .  Als o,  the va ria nce ofeac h c omp one nt  is bound ed by th eco rr es pon dingd iagonalel eme nt  of  $\te x t{CRB} (\bol dsym bo l{ h })$ , i.e., $\ t e xt{v ar }( \hat {h} _i ) \ge 
[\t e xt{ CRB}(\b oldsymbol {h} ) ]_{i i} $. 

We ob serve from (\ [C RB\]) that  t heCRB ma t r ix of $\ boldsymbol{h}$ dependso n the q uan tizat ionthreshold s $ \bolds ymb o l{\tau }$ aswellas  th e matri x $\ bol ds ymbol{A}$w h ich  is c on stru cted fr om training sequen c es$\boldsymbol{ X}$  (cf . (\ [A- X -r e lat io n shi p \ ])). Naturally,  we wish t oo pt imize $\bo l dsy mb ol{\tau }$ and$\bol d symbol{ A}$ (i.e.  $\boldsy mb ol{X } $ )
}^{N}
g(\tau_n,\boldsymbol{a}_n)\boldsymbol{a}_n\boldsymbol{a}_n^T\end{aligned}$$ where_$g(\tau_n,\boldsymbol{a}_n)$ is_defined as $$\begin{aligned}
g(\tau_n,\boldsymbol{a}_n) \triangleq_\frac {f_{w}^2
(\boldsymbol{a}_n^{T}\boldsymbol{h}-\tau_n)}
{F_{w}(\boldsymbol{a}_n^{T}\boldsymbol{h}-\tau_n)(1-F_{w}(\boldsymbol{a}_n^{T}\boldsymbol{h}-\tau_n))}
\label{g-function}\end{aligned}$$_in_which $f_{w}(\cdot)$_denotes_the probability density_function (PDF) of_$w_n$. Accordingly, the CRB_matrix for the_estimation_problem (\[quantized-data-model-vector\]) is given by $$\begin{aligned}
\text{CRB}(\boldsymbol{h})=\boldsymbol{J}^{-1}(\boldsymbol{h}) =
\left( \sum_{n=1}^{N} g(\tau_n,\boldsymbol{a}_n) \boldsymbol{a}_n
\boldsymbol{a}_n^T \right)^{-1} \label{CRB}\end{aligned}$$

See Appendix \[appB\].

As_is_well known,_the_CRB_places a lower bound on_the estimation error of any_unbiased estimator_[@Kay93] and is asymptotically attained by the ML_estimator._Specifically, the covariance_matrix of any unbiased estimate satisfies: $\text{cov}(\hat{\boldsymbol{h}})-\text{CRB}(\boldsymbol{h})
\succeq \boldsymbol{0}$. Also,_the variance of each component is_bounded by the_corresponding_diagonal_element of $\text{CRB}(\boldsymbol{h})$, i.e.,_$\text{var}(\hat{h}_i) \ge
[\text{CRB}(\boldsymbol{h})]_{ii}$.

We observe from (\[CRB\]) that_the CRB matrix of $\boldsymbol{h}$ depends_on the quantization thresholds $\boldsymbol{\tau}$ as well_as the matrix $\boldsymbol{A}$ which is_constructed from training sequences $\boldsymbol{X}$_(cf. (\[A-X-relationship\]))._Naturally, we wish to optimize_$\boldsymbol{\tau}$ and $\boldsymbol{A}$_(i.e. $\boldsymbol{X}$)