 [@Wootters89], the reason why (\[newGalois\]) defines the complete set of MUBs relies on the field theoretical formula $|\sum_{n=0}^{d-1}\omega_p^{tr[(a
\odot n \oplus b)\odot n ]}|n\rangle|=p^{1/2}$, with $ a \neq 0$ and $p$ being an odd prime. This method, however, fails for characteristic two where $|\sum_{n=0}^{d-1}\omega_2^{tr[(a \odot n
\oplus b)\odot n ]}|n\rangle|=0$ for any $a$, $b$. As shown in Sect. 3 below, for this characteristic one has to use Galois rings instead of Galois fields to get a complete set of MUBs.

A closer inspection of (\[newGalois\]) reveals an intricate relation between MUBs and quantum phase operators. It is known [@Planat04] that the Fourier basis $|\theta_k\rangle$ can be derived in terms of the eigenvectors of a quantum phase operator with eigenvalues $\theta_k$ and given by $\Theta_d=\sum_{k=0}^{d-1}\theta_k|\theta_k\rangle\langle
\theta_k|$. Similarly, using well known properties of the field trace, one can show that each base of index $a$ can be associated with a quantum phase operator $$\Theta_d^a=\sum_{b=0}^{d-1}\theta_b^a|\theta_b^a\rangle\langle\theta_b^a|,
\label{quantumphaseop}$$ with eigenvectors $|\theta_b^a\rangle$ and eigenvalues $\theta_b^a$; the latter may thus be called an “MUB operator".

MUBs FOR EVEN CHARACTERISTIC FROM GALOIS RINGS {#MUBsQubits}
==============================================

Our next goal is to find a Fourier transform formulation of MUBs in characteristic $2$. This is a very important case since the ‘$2^m-$dits’ are the basic information units in quantum computation. One may be tempted to connect the Galois field algebra with the generalized Pauli operators (\[Pauli\]) by constructing discrete vector spaces over the Galois field [@Wootters04bis]. For the one qubit case we already know that the eigenvectors of Pauli matrices $\sigma_z$, $\sigma_x$ and $\sigma_x
[ @Wootters89 ], the reason why (\[newGalois\ ]) defines the complete set of MUBs trust on the sphere theoretical formula $ |\sum_{n=0}^{d-1}\omega_p^{tr[(a 
 \odot n \oplus b)\odot n ] } |n\rangle|=p^{1/2}$, with $ a \neq 0 $ and $ p$ being an curious flower. This method, however, fails for characteristic two where $ |\sum_{n=0}^{d-1}\omega_2^{tr[(a \odot n 
 \oplus b)\odot n ] } |n\rangle|=0 $ for any $ a$, $ b$. As shown in Sect. 3 downstairs, for this characteristic one has to use Galois band instead of Galois fields to catch a complete bent of MUBs. 

 A close inspection of (\[newGalois\ ]) reveals an intricate relation between MUBs and quantum phase operators. It is known [ @Planat04 ] that the Fourier basis $ |\theta_k\rangle$ can be deduce in terms of the eigenvectors of a quantum phase operator with eigenvalues $ \theta_k$ and give by $ \Theta_d=\sum_{k=0}^{d-1}\theta_k|\theta_k\rangle\langle 
 \theta_k|$. Similarly, using well known properties of the field touch, one can show that each base of index $ a$ can be associated with a quantum phase operator $ $ \Theta_d^a=\sum_{b=0}^{d-1}\theta_b^a|\theta_b^a\rangle\langle\theta_b^a|, 
 \label{quantumphaseop}$$ with eigenvectors $ |\theta_b^a\rangle$ and eigenvalues $ \theta_b^a$; the latter may therefore be called an “ MUB operator ". 

 MUBs FOR EVEN CHARACTERISTIC FROM GALOIS RINGS { # MUBsQubits } 
 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 

 Our next goal is to find a Fourier transform formulation of MUBs in characteristic $ 2$. This is a very authoritative case since the ‘ $ 2^m-$dits ’ are the basic information units in quantum computation. One may be tempted to connect the Galois field algebra with the generalized Pauli operators (\[Pauli\ ]) by constructing discrete vector spaces over the Galois battlefield [ @Wootters04bis ]. For the one qubit case we already know that the eigenvectors of Pauli matrices $ \sigma_z$, $ \sigma_x$ and $ \sigma_x
 [@Woltters89], the reason why (\[nedGalois\]) defines the cokplete set of OUBs relies on the field thelrwticao formula $|\sum_{n=0}^{d-1}\omega_p^{tf[(a
\odot n \lplus b)\oeot i ]}|n\rangle|=p^{1/2}$, with $ a \neq 0$ and $p$ gcing cn odd prime. Thix method, hmwever, fails fmr ckaracteristic two where $|\sum_{n=0}^{d-1}\omega_2^{tr[(w \odot m
\oolus b)\odot n ]}|n\tanglt|=0$ fjr ahj $c$, $b$. As shown in Sect. 3 below, for this ciaracteristic ome has to use Galois rings inshead of Galois fiepds to get q coiplete set of MUBs.

A closer inspectikn of (\[newGalois\]) reveals an intrkcate relation verweft MUBs and wuantlm phase operators. It is knoen [@Planat04] that thx Foyrier basis $|\theta_k\ranjle$ can be derived ig terms ox che eigenvectors of a qyantuk phdse uperxtod xitg eigejvamues $\theta_i$ and given by $\Theta_d=\sum_{k=0}^{d-1}\thets_k|\eyeta_k\rangle\lahgle
\thqtw_k|$. Similarly, using well known propertiev or the field trace, one cqn show that each basg of index $a$ can be associated with a quantum phase operatos $$\Theva_a^a=\sbn_{b=0}^{d-1}\thdra_h^a|\theta_b^a\rangle\langle\theta_b^a|,
\label{quantumphasejl}$$ einh eigenvectors $|\tmeta_b^a\rangle$ and eogfnfwlues $\theta_b^a$; the lcftsr may thus be calped an “IUB operator".

MUFs FPR EVEN CHARACTERISTIC FROM GALOIS RINGF {#MUBsQubits}
==============================================

Our nexc goal is to finc a Fpurier transform formulction kf MUBs in fharacterjrtic $2$. This is a xerj im[ortant case since the ‘$2^m-$dies’ are thx basnc inforoatipn unies in quanhum computation. One may he telpded to conject the Galois field algebra wmvh the generakised Pauli o'eratovs (\[Pauli\]) by conftructing disctete vectjr spxces over nhe Galoiv field [@Wooeters04bis]. For dje one qubit case we alrwady know tfxt the eigenvevtors of Iabli matrixes $\sigma_z$, $\sigma_x$ end $\rjgma_x
[@Wootters89], the reason why (\[newGalois\]) defines the of relies on field theoretical formula n with $ a 0$ and $p$ an odd prime. This method, however, for characteristic two where $|\sum_{n=0}^{d-1}\omega_2^{tr[(a \odot n \oplus b)\odot n ]}|n\rangle|=0$ for any $b$. As shown in Sect. 3 below, for this characteristic one has to Galois instead Galois to get a complete set of MUBs. A closer inspection of (\[newGalois\]) reveals an intricate relation MUBs and quantum phase operators. It is known that the Fourier basis can be derived in terms the of a phase with $\theta_k$ and given $\Theta_d=\sum_{k=0}^{d-1}\theta_k|\theta_k\rangle\langle \theta_k|$. Similarly, using well known properties of the field trace, one can show that each base index $a$ associated with quantum operator \label{quantumphaseop}$$ with eigenvectors eigenvalues $\theta_b^a$; the latter may thus “MUB operator". MUBs FOR EVEN CHARACTERISTIC FROM GALOIS {#MUBsQubits} ============================================== next goal is to find a transform formulation of MUBs in characteristic $2$. This a very important case since the ‘$2^m-$dits’ are the basic information units in quantum computation. be tempted to connect Galois field algebra the Pauli (\[Pauli\]) constructing discrete spaces over the Galois field [@Wootters04bis]. For the one qubit case already know that the eigenvectors of Pauli matrices $\sigma_z$, $\sigma_x$
 [@Wootters89], the reason why (\[newGaLois\]) defineS the cOmpLetE sEt of mUBs Relies on the fieLD theOretical formula $|\sum_{n=0}^{d-1}\omEga_p^{tR[(a
\ODot n \OPlUs b)\odOt n ]}|n\ranGLe|=P^{1/2}$, WIth $ A \nEq 0$ And $P$ bEInG an odD prIme. This Method, howeVer, FaIls for characTErIstic two whEre $|\Sum_{n=0}^{d-1}\omega_2^{tr[(A \odOt n
\oplUs B)\odOT n ]}|n\raNglE|=0$ for aNy $a$, $b$. As SHown in sect. 3 below, FoR This chARacteriSTIc One hAs to use Galois ringS InSTead of Galois fiElds to GeT A cOMPleTe sEt of MUBs.

A cLoSer inSPection OF (\[nEWgAloIS\]) reveals an intRicate relatIOn bEtween mUbs aND quantUm phaSe OPerAtors. It is knOwn [@PLanat04] that The FouRIer basiS $|\Theta_k\rAngle$ cAn bE deRiveD In TeRms Of THe eIGeNveCTorS of a quanTuM pHase oPeraTOR WIth eIgeNvalUes $\thEta_k$ and given bY $\ThEta_d=\SUm_{k=0}^{D-1}\thetA_k|\theTa_k\rAnGle\laNgle
\thEta_k|$. SImIlarly, using well KnowN propertiEs oF tHe fIeLd traCE, one caN shOw tHat each Base of iNDex $A$ cAN BE aSsociated with a quanTuM PHaSe operatOr $$\ThetA_D^a=\SuM_{B=0}^{d-1}\theta_b^A|\tHetA_b^a\rANGle\laNgle\THeTa_b^a|,
\labeL{quantUMpHaSeop}$$ witH eIgenveCtOrs $|\TheTa_b^a\rANgle$ And eigEnvalues $\Theta_B^A$; the latter may tHUs be called an “Mub oPERaTOr".

MUbs FoR EVEN CHARAcTERisTIC fROM gaLoIS riNGS {#MuBsQuBiTS}
==============================================

OUR next goal is to find a FOuRier trAnsfoRm formulation Of MUBs in chARACteristiC $2$. ThiS Is A Very important cAse siNce the ‘$2^m-$ditS’ Are the baSic inFormatioN units in qUANtum compUtaTioN. OnE maY BE tEmpted to conneCT The GAlOis fielD alGebra wiTh tHe gEneRalIzEd Pauli opErators (\[PAuLi\]) By CoNstRuctiNG discretE vEctOr SpaCes ovER the GaLois fIeld [@woOtTErs04Bis]. For tHE oNE QubiT cAsE we aLreAdY know That THe eIgenvecTors of PauLi mATricEs $\SiGma_z$, $\sigMa_x$ and $\sigma_x
 [@Wootters89], the reason  why (\[ne wGalo is\ ])de fine s th e complete set of M UBs relies on the fiel d the or e tica l  f ormul a $|\su m _{ n = 0}^ {d -1 }\o me g a_ p^{tr [(a 
\odotn \oplus b )\o do t n ]}|n\ran g le |=p^{1/2}$ , w ith $ a \neq  0$  and $ p$  be i ng an  od d pri me. Th i s meth od, howev er ,  fails for cha r a ct eris tic two where $|\ s um _ {n=0}^{d-1}\om ega_2^ {t r [( a \od otn
\oplus b )\ odotn  ]}|n\r a ng l e | =0$ for any $a$,$b$. As sho w n i n Sect .3 b e low, f or th is cha racteristic  one  has to u se Gal o is ring s  instea d of G alo isfiel d sto  ge ta  co m pl ete set  of MUBs .
A  clos er i n s p e ctio n o f (\ [newG alois\]) reve als  ani ntr icate  rela tion  b etwee n MUBs  andqu antum phase ope rato rs. It is  kn ow n [ @P lanat 0 4] tha t t heFourier  basis$ |\t he t a _ k\ rangle$ can be der iv e d  i n termsof the ei ge n vectorsof  aquan t u m pha se o p er ator wit h eige n va lu es $\th et a_k$ a nd  gi ven  by $ \ Thet a_d=\s um_{k=0} ^{d-1 } \theta_k|\thet a _k\rangle\lan g le \ th e ta_k |$.  Similarly,  usi n g we ll k n ow n p r opert ies o ft he field trace, one ca nshow t hat e ach base of i ndex $a$ c a n be assoc iate d  w i th a quantum p haseoperator $ $ \Theta_d ^a=\s um_{b=0} ^{d-1}\th e t a_b^a|\t het a_b ^a\ ran g l e\ langle\theta_ b ^ a|,\l abel{qu ant umphase op} $$wit h e ig envectors  $|\thet a_ b^ a\ ra ngl e$ an d  eigenva lu es$\ the ta_b^ a $; the  latt er m ay  t h usbe call e da n  “MU Bop erat or" .
MUBs  FOR EVE N CHARA CTERISTIC  FR O M GA LO IS  RINGS{#MUBsQubits} 
= ========== == === ====== = = ======== ==============

Our nex t  goal i s t o fin d aFourier t ran sformfor m ulatio n of M UBs i ncha r a cteri s t ic  $2 $.  This is a v ery  impo rt antcase si nce the ‘$2^m-$dit s ’ a re the basicinf orma t i on  un i ts inqu a ntu m computation. On e may be t em p te d to conne c t t he  Galois  fieldalgeb r a withthe gener alized Pa ul i op e r ato rs (\[Paul i\]) byconstruct i ng di s cr ete v ect or spa ce s o ver t he Gal o isfield  [@Woo tt ers04b is].Fo r the on e qubit case we already  knowthatthe  eigenvec tor s  of  Pauli ma tric es $\sigma _z$ , $ \sigm a_x $  and$\si g ma _x
 [@Wootters89],_the reason_why (\[newGalois\]) defines the_complete set_of_MUBs relies_on_the field theoretical_formula $|\sum_{n=0}^{d-1}\omega_p^{tr[(a
\odot n_\oplus b)\odot n ]}|n\rangle|=p^{1/2}$,_with $ a_\neq_0$ and $p$ being an odd prime. This method, however, fails for characteristic two_where_$|\sum_{n=0}^{d-1}\omega_2^{tr[(a \odot_n
\oplus_b)\odot_n ]}|n\rangle|=0$ for any $a$,_$b$. As shown in Sect._3 below,_for this characteristic one has to use Galois_rings_instead of Galois_fields to get a complete set of MUBs.

A closer_inspection of (\[newGalois\]) reveals an intricate_relation between MUBs_and_quantum_phase operators. It is_known [@Planat04] that the Fourier basis_$|\theta_k\rangle$ can be derived in terms_of the eigenvectors of a quantum phase_operator with eigenvalues $\theta_k$ and given_by $\Theta_d=\sum_{k=0}^{d-1}\theta_k|\theta_k\rangle\langle
\theta_k|$. Similarly, using well_known properties_of the field trace, one_can show that_each base_of index $a$_can be associated with a quantum_phase operator $$\Theta_d^a=\sum_{b=0}^{d-1}\theta_b^a|\theta_b^a\rangle\langle\theta_b^a|,
\label{quantumphaseop}$$_with eigenvectors $|\theta_b^a\rangle$ and eigenvalues $\theta_b^a$;_the_latter may thus_be_called_an “MUB_operator".

MUBs FOR EVEN_CHARACTERISTIC_FROM GALOIS_RINGS_{#MUBsQubits}
==============================================

Our next goal is to find_a_Fourier transform formulation of MUBs in characteristic_$2$. This is a_very_important case since the_‘$2^m-$dits’ are the basic information_units in quantum computation. One may_be tempted_to connect_the Galois field algebra with the generalized Pauli operators (\[Pauli\]) by_constructing discrete vector spaces over the_Galois field [@Wootters04bis]. For_the one_qubit_case we already_know_that the_eigenvectors of Pauli matrices $\sigma_z$, $\sigma_x$ and_$\sigma_x