, the outbursts in such systems. Fortunately, this is not bad for our purposes since we are trying to derive an upper limit for the real probability of detecting the CVs. In this way, having a disrupted disc (cold and stable) would lower the probability even further.

Once we know that the CVs are DNe, we are able to compute the recurrence time and the duration of the outburst, based on equations \[TREC\] and \[TDUR\]. The results are displayed in Fig. \[Fig05\]. Notice that the recurrence time varies from days to decades and the outbursts last a few days. Notice also a double peak in the distribution of the recurrence time due to the double peak in the WD mass. Dynamically formed CVs have greater WD masses, implying longer recurrence times according to Equation \[TREC\]. Now, for the distribution of the duration of the outburst, we do not see too many differences between dynamically formed CVs and CVs formed without influence of dynamics. This is due to the status of the CVs at the present-day (period bouncers). They mainly have periods from $\sim$ 2 to $\sim$ 3h and according to Equation \[TDUR\] (which is a function of the orbital period) they are similar.

From Fig. \[Fig05\], we can see that the chances to observe a CV during outburst are high only for some CVs – the youngest ones that were formed close to the present-day and have greater donor masses and higher mass transfer rates with respect to the old ones. In this way, we have the first clue that a good solution would, instead of looking for variability during an outburst, look for it during quiescence. The biggest problem associated with this approach is the need of very deep observations because in order to reach magnitudes similar to those associated with a CV during quiescence, one needs deeper observations in comparison with the same CV during its outbursts. Although a difficult task, it is possible. For instance, @Cohn_2010 reached apparent visual magnitudes as deep as $\sim$ 26 when studying the optical counterparts of X-ray sources in the GC NGC 6397.

Probability of Detection through Variability {#probability}
--------------------------------------------

Now, once we have separated the CVs with respect to the disc instability and computed their recurrence times as well as the duration of their outbursts, we can turn to the computation of the probability of detecting such CVs by using equation
, the outbursts in such systems. Fortunately, this is not bad for our purposes since we are judge to deduce an upper limit for the real probability of detect the CVs. In this room, having a disrupted phonograph record (cold and stable) would lower the probability even farther. 

 Once we know that the CVs are DNe, we are able to calculate the recurrence time and the duration of the outburst, based on equations \[TREC\ ] and \[TDUR\ ]. The result are displayed in Fig. \[Fig05\ ]. Notice that the recurrence time varies from days to decade and the outbursts last a few days. poster also a double peak in the distribution of the recurrence time due to the bivalent peak in the WD multitude. Dynamically formed CVs have great WD masses, implying longer recurrence times according to Equation \[TREC\ ]. Now, for the distribution of the duration of the effusion, we do not attend too many differences between dynamically formed CVs and CVs formed without influence of dynamics. This is due to the status of the curriculum vitae at the present - sidereal day (period bouncers). They mainly get periods from $ \sim$ 2 to $ \sim$ 3h and according to Equation \[TDUR\ ] (which is a function of the orbital time period) they are similar. 

 From Fig. \[Fig05\ ], we can see that the chances to observe a curriculum vitae during outburst are high only for some CVs – the youngest ones that were formed close to the present - day and have greater donor masses and higher bulk transfer rate with respect to the old ones. In this way, we have the inaugural clue that a good solution would, instead of look for unevenness during an outburst, look for it during quiescence. The biggest problem consort with this approach is the need of very bass observations because in ordering to reach magnitude similar to those consociate with a CV during quiescence, one need deep observations in comparison with the same CV during its outbursts. Although a difficult task, it is possible. For instance, @Cohn_2010 reach apparent visual magnitudes equally deep as $ \sim$ 26 when studying the optical counterparts of X - ray sources in the GC NGC 6397. 

 Probability of Detection through Variability { # probability } 
 -------------------------------------------- 

 immediately, once we have separated the CVs with respect to the disc instability and computed their recurrence multiplication equally well as the duration of their outbursts, we can turn to the computation of the probability of detecting such CVs by using equation
, thf outbursts in such systtms. Fortunately, tkus is iot bad for our purposes since we are tryinj to derice an upper limit for ghe real irobabiliry oh detecting the RBs. In tmns wag, havnnj a disrupted dlsc (cold ang stable) would luwzr the probability even further.

Once re know tjat the CVs arg DNe, re adv cble to compute the recurrence fime anv the duration pf the outburst, based on eeuatlons \[TREC\] and \[TDUR\]. The resultw arq displayed iv Fig. \[Fig05\]. Notice that jhe recurrence time varies from aays co decades qne tjg outbursts oast w few days. Notice alvo a doible peak in tme divtrubution of the recurrxnce time due to the double paai in the WD mass. Eybamicdlly forowd ZVs heve greatfr XD masses, ijplying lonter recurrence timex wbvording to Esuatiog \[EREC\]. Now, for the distribution of the dugatikn of the outburst, we di not see too many divferences between dynamically formed CVs and CVs formed widhout knfoucnce if dynamics. This is due to the status of the CVf au tme present-day (peviod bouncers). They mwimjy have perioas from $\sjm$ 2 to $\sim$ 3h and afcordind to Wquation \[UDUR\] (ehich is a function of the irbital perije) they are similar.

Yrom Fig. \[Fig05\], we van sre that the chances to ubsedve a CV duging outbhfst are high onlh fpr some CVs – the youngest onqs that wxre fprmed cuose to thq present-dwy and have greater donog masdev and highfr mass transfer rates with res'xct to the olc mnev. In thif way, we have the sirst clue thaj a good folutkon would, pnstead oh looking fow variability furing an ouvburst, lojk fir ir durine quiescence. Thr biggest problem awsociated with thix akpdoach is the nezb if very deep obxerxatyojs bqwause in ordar tu rdsch mxgnitudtf wkmilsr to those associatad wjth a CV during quoefcence, obe needs deeper obserfations in comparidon wmth thx same CV during its outbursts. Although a difficklt task, it is [osslble. For instauce, @Cohn_2010 reached apparent visual magnituves as deep as $\sim$ 26 whgn studying the opticcl counterparvs of V-ray sourwes in the GC NGC 6397.

Pribability of Detegtion through Variabiljty {#prmbabipity}
--------------------------------------------

Now, once we have separated the CVs with respect to the disc instabiliry and computed thsir tecurgenee cimes af wepu as the duratiom of their outbursts, we can turi to the cmm'utation of the probability og aetecting sucf CVs by using equation
, the outbursts in such systems. Fortunately, not for our since we are limit the real probability detecting the CVs. this way, having a disrupted disc and stable) would lower the probability even further. Once we know that the are DNe, we are able to compute the recurrence time and the duration the based equations and \[TDUR\]. The results are displayed in Fig. \[Fig05\]. Notice that the recurrence time varies from to decades and the outbursts last a few Notice also a double in the distribution of the time to the peak the mass. Dynamically formed have greater WD masses, implying longer recurrence times according to Equation \[TREC\]. Now, for the distribution of duration of we do see many between dynamically formed CVs formed without influence of dynamics. to the status of the CVs at the (period bouncers). mainly have periods from $\sim$ 2 $\sim$ 3h and according to Equation \[TDUR\] (which a function of the orbital period) they are similar. From Fig. \[Fig05\], we can see chances to observe a during outburst are only some – youngest ones were formed close to the present-day and have greater donor masses higher mass transfer rates with respect to the old ones. way, have the first that a good solution instead looking for variability during look it biggest associated this approach is the of very deep observations because order to reach magnitudes a CV during quiescence, one needs deeper observations comparison with the same CV during its Although a difficult task, it is possible. For instance, @Cohn_2010 reached apparent magnitudes as $\sim$ 26 when studying the optical counterparts of sources in the GC 6397. Probability of Detection through Variability {#probability} -------------------------------------------- Now, we separated the with respect to disc instability and their recurrence times as the of outbursts, to the computation of the probability detecting CVs by using equation
, the outbursts in such systems. fortunatelY, this Is nOt bAd For oUr puRposes since we aRE tryIng to derive an upper limiT for tHe REal pRObAbiliTy of detECtING thE Cvs. in tHiS WaY, haviNg a DisruptEd disc (cold And StAble) would lowER tHe probabilIty Even further.

ONce We know ThAt tHE CVs aRe Dne, we aRe able TO compuTe the recuRrENce timE And the dURAtIon oF the outburst, based ON eQUations \[TREC\] and \[tDUR\]. ThE rESuLTS arE diSplayed in FIg. \[fig05\]. NoTIce that THe RECUrrENce time varies From days to dECadEs and tHe OutBUrsts lAst a fEw DAys. notice also a DoubLe peak in tHe distRIbution OF the recUrrencE tiMe dUe to THe DoUblE pEAk iN ThE WD MAss. dynamicaLlY fOrmed cVs hAVE GReatEr Wd masSes, imPlying longer rEcuRrenCE tiMes acCordiNg to eqUatioN \[TREC\]. NOw, for ThE distribution of The dUration of The OuTbuRsT, we do NOt see tOo mAny DiffereNces betWEen DyNAMIcAlly formed CVs and CVS fORMeD without InflueNCe Of DYnamics. THiS is Due tO THe staTus oF ThE CVs at thE preseNT-dAy (Period bOuNcers). THeY maInlY have PErioDs from $\Sim$ 2 to $\sim$ 3H and aCCording to EquatIOn \[TDUR\] (which is A FuNCTiON of tHe oRbital perioD) theY Are sImilAR.

FRom fIg. \[Fig05\], We can SeE ThAT the chances to observE a cV duriNg outBurst are high oNly for some cvS – The youngEst oNEs THat were formed cLose tO the presenT-Day and haVe greAter donoR masses anD HIgher masS trAnsFer RatES WiTh respect to thE OLd onEs. in this wAy, wE have thE fiRst CluE thAt A good soluTion woulD, iNsTeAd Of lOokinG For variaBiLitY dUriNg an oUTburst, Look fOr it DuRiNG quIescencE. thE BIggeSt PrObleM asSoCiateD witH ThiS approaCh is the neEd oF Very DeEp ObservaTions because iN oRder to reacH mAgnItudes SIMilar to tHose associated with a CV duRIng quieSceNce, onE neeDs deeper oBseRvatioNs iN ComparIson wiTh the SaMe Cv DUring ITS oUtbUrSts. AlthougH A DifFiculT tAsk, iT is possIble. For instance, @CohN_2010 ReaChed apparent vIsuAl maGNItUdeS As DEep As $\SIm$ 26 wHEN studying the optIcal counteRpARtS of X-ray souRCes In The GC NGc 6397.

ProbabIlity OF DetectIon througH VariabilItY {#proBABilIty}
--------------------------------------------

Now, once We have seParated thE cVs wiTH rEspecT to The disC iNstAbiliTy and cOMpuTed thEir recUrRence tImes aS wEll as the Duration of their outburstS, we can Turn tO thE computatIon OF thE probabilIty oF detecting SucH CVS by usIng EQuatiOn
, the outbursts in such sy stems. For tunat ely , t hi s is  not  bad for our p u rpos es since we are trying  to d er i ve a n  u pperlimit f o rt h e r ea lpro ba b il ity o f d etectin g the CVs.  In  t his way, hav i ng  a disrupt eddisc (cold a ndstable )wou l d low erthe p robabi l ity ev en furthe r. 
Oncew e knowt h at  the  CVs are DNe, wea re able to comput e there c ur r e nce  ti me and the  d urati o n of th e  o u t b urs t , based on eq uations \[T R EC\ ] and\[ TDU R \]. Th e res ul t s a re displaye d in  Fig. \[F ig05\] .  Notice that th e recu rre nce  tim e  v ar ies  f r omd ay s t o  de cades an dth e out burs t s l asta f ew d ays.Notice also a  do uble pea k inthe d istr ib ution  of th e rec ur rence time dueto t he double  pe ak  in  t he WD mass.Dyn ami cally f ormed C V s h av e g re ater WD masses, im pl y i ng  longerrecurr e nc et imes acc or din g to E quati on \ [ TR EC\]. No w, for th edistrib ut ion of  t hedur ation of t he out burst, w e don ot see too man y  differencesb et w e en dyna mic ally formed  CVs andCVsf or med witho ut in fl u en c e of dynamics. This  i s dueto th e status of t he CVs att h e  present -day (p e riod bouncers) . The y mainly h a ve perio ds fr om $\sim $ 2 to $\ s i m$ 3h an d a cco rdi ngt o  E quation \[TDU R \ ] (w hi ch is a  fu nctionofthe  or bit al  period)they are  s im il ar .
FromF ig. \[Fi g0 5\] ,wecan s e e that  thechan ce st o o bservea  C V duri ng  o utbu rst  a re hi gh o n lyfor som e CVs – t hey oung es tones th at were forme dclose to t he  pr esent- d a y and ha ve greater donor masses and hig her  mass  tra nsfer rat eswith r esp e ct tothe ol d one s.  In t his w a y ,weha ve the fir s t  cl ue th at  a g ood sol ution would, inste a d o f looking for  va riab i l it y d u ri n g a no utb u r st, look for it  during qu ie s ce nce. The b i gge st  proble m assoc iated with th is approa ch is the  n eedo f  ve ry deep ob servatio ns becaus e  in o r de r torea ch mag ni tud es si milart o t hoseassoci at ed wit h a C Vduring q uiescence, one needs de eper o bserv ati ons in co mpa r iso n with th e sa me CV duri ngits  outb urs t s. Al thou g ha d i fficu lt t a sk, it is po ssi b l e.  For instan c e ,  @C ohn_2 010 reache d ap parent visual mag n itudes as deep  as$ \ sim $ 2 6  whe nstudying the o pti ca l counterp ar ts of X-ray  sources  i n  theGC NGC  6397. 

Proba b i li t y of D etec tio n through  Va ri a bility{# pr o babili ty}-- ------ ------ - ---- - - ---------------- ----- - - 

Now ,  on ce we  h ave sep a rate d the CVswith respec t to t he d isc i nstabil it y andcom pu ted theirr ecurrence  time s as we ll  asthe  durat iono f  thei r ou tb urs ts, we ca n tu r nto the  com putat io n of  the prob a bility o f d e tecting  s uch C Vs byu si n g  equation
, the_outbursts in_such systems. Fortunately, this_is not_bad_for our_purposes_since we are_trying to derive_an upper limit for_the real probability_of_detecting the CVs. In this way, having a disrupted disc (cold and stable) would_lower_the probability_even_further.

Once_we know that the CVs_are DNe, we are able_to compute_the recurrence time and the duration of the_outburst,_based on equations_\[TREC\] and \[TDUR\]. The results are displayed in Fig._\[Fig05\]. Notice that the recurrence time_varies from days_to_decades_and the outbursts last_a few days. Notice also a_double peak in the distribution of_the recurrence time due to the double_peak in the WD mass. Dynamically_formed CVs have greater WD_masses, implying_longer recurrence times according to_Equation \[TREC\]. Now,_for the_distribution of the_duration of the outburst, we do_not see too_many differences between dynamically formed CVs_and_CVs formed without_influence_of_dynamics. This_is due to_the_status of_the_CVs at the present-day (period bouncers)._They_mainly have periods from $\sim$ 2 to_$\sim$ 3h and according_to_Equation \[TDUR\] (which is_a function of the orbital_period) they are similar.

From Fig. \[Fig05\],_we can_see that_the chances to observe a CV during outburst are high only_for some CVs – the youngest_ones that were formed_close to_the_present-day and have_greater_donor masses_and higher mass transfer rates with respect_to the_old ones. In this way, we_have the first clue_that_a good solution would, instead of_looking for variability during an outburst,_look for it during quiescence._The_biggest_problem associated with this approach_is the need of very deep_observations because in_order to reach magnitudes similar to those_associated_with a CV during quiescence, one_needs_deeper observations in comparison with the_same_CV_during its outbursts. Although a_difficult task, it is possible. For_instance, @Cohn_2010 reached apparent visual magnitudes as deep as_$\sim$ 26 when_studying the optical counterparts of_X-ray_sources_in the GC NGC 6397.

Probability of Detection through Variability {#probability}
--------------------------------------------

Now,_once we_have separated the_CVs with respect to the disc instability and computed their_recurrence times as well as the duration_of their outbursts, we can turn to the computation of the_probability of detecting such CVs by using equation