 we arrive at the bound $$\label{eqn:gm-am-temp2}
\begin{aligned}
{\operatorname{tr}}\big[ {{\bm{H}}}{{\bm{W}}}^q {{\bm{H}}} {{\bm{Y}}}^{2r-q} \big]
+ {\operatorname{tr}}\big[ {{\bm{H}}}{{\bm{W}}}^{2r-q} {{\bm{H}}} {{\bm{Y}}}^{q} \big]
    &\leq \sum_{i,j=1}^d \big( {\left\vert {\lambda_i} \right\vert}^q {\left\vert {\smash{\mu_j}} \right\vert}^{2r-q}
    + {\left\vert {\lambda_i} \right\vert}^{2r-q} {\left\vert {\smash{\mu_j}} \right\vert}^{q}\big)
    \cdot {{{\left\vert { {{\bm{u}}}_i^{*}{{\bm{H}}} {{\bm{v}}}_j } \right\vert}}^2} \\
    &\leq \sum_{i,j=1}^d \big( \lambda_i^{2r} + \mu_j^{2r} \big)
    \cdot {{{\left\vert { {{\bm{u}}}_i^{*}{{\bm{H}}} {{\bm{v}}}_j } \right\vert}}^2}.
\end{aligned}$$ The second inequality is , with $\theta = q/(2r)$ and $\lambda = \lambda_i^{2r}$ and $\mu = \mu_j^{2r}$.

It remains to rewrite the right-hand side of  a more recognizable form. To that end, observe that $$\begin{aligned}
{\operatorname{tr}}\big[ {{\bm{H}}}{{\bm{W}}}^q {{\bm{H}}} {{\bm{Y}}}^{2r-q} \big]
&+ {\operatorname{tr}}\big[ {{\bm{H}}}{{\bm{W}}}^{2r-q} {{\bm{H}}} {{\bm{Y}}}^{q} \big] \\
    &\leq \sum_{i,j=1}^d \big( \lambda_i^{2r} + \mu_j^{2r} \big)
    \cdot {\operatorname{tr}}\big[ {{\bm{H}}} {{\bm{u
we arrive at the bound $ $ \label{eqn: gm - am - temp2 } 
 \begin{aligned } 
 { \operatorname{tr}}\big [ { { \bm{H}}}{{\bm{W}}}^q { { \bm{H } } } { { \bm{Y}}}^{2r - q } \big ] 
 + { \operatorname{tr}}\big [ { { \bm{H}}}{{\bm{W}}}^{2r - q } { { \bm{H } } } { { \bm{Y}}}^{q } \big ] 
     & \leq \sum_{i, j=1}^d \big ({ \left\vert { \lambda_i } \right\vert}^q { \left\vert { \smash{\mu_j } } \right\vert}^{2r - q } 
     + { \left\vert { \lambda_i } \right\vert}^{2r - q } { \left\vert { \smash{\mu_j } } \right\vert}^{q}\big) 
     \cdot { { { \left\vert { { { \bm{u}}}_i^{*}{{\bm{H } } } { { \bm{v}}}_j } \right\vert}}^2 } \\ 
     & \leq \sum_{i, j=1}^d \big (\lambda_i^{2r } + \mu_j^{2r } \big) 
     \cdot { { { \left\vert { { { \bm{u}}}_i^{*}{{\bm{H } } } { { \bm{v}}}_j } \right\vert}}^2 }. 
 \end{aligned}$$ The second inequality is  , with $ \theta = q/(2r)$ and $ \lambda = \lambda_i^{2r}$ and $ \mu = \mu_j^{2r}$. 

 It remains to rewrite the right - bridge player slope of    a more recognizable form. To that end, observe that $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 { \operatorname{tr}}\big [ { { \bm{H}}}{{\bm{W}}}^q { { \bm{H } } } { { \bm{Y}}}^{2r - q } \big ] 
 & + { \operatorname{tr}}\big [ { { \bm{H}}}{{\bm{W}}}^{2r - q } { { \bm{H } } } { { \bm{Y}}}^{q } \big ] \\ 
     & \leq \sum_{i, j=1}^d \big (\lambda_i^{2r } + \mu_j^{2r } \big) 
     \cdot { \operatorname{tr}}\big [ { { \bm{H } } } { { \bm{u
 we arrive at the bound $$\labtl{eqn:gm-am-temp2}
\begiu{qlignev}
{\operatkrname{tr}}\cig[ {{\bm{H}}}{{\bm{W}}}^q {{\bm{H}}} {{\bm{Y}}}^{2r-q} \big]
+ {\opxratirnamt{nr}}\big[ {{\bm{H}}}{{\bm{W}}}^{2r-q} {{\bm{H}}} {{\bm{H}}}^{q} \big]
    &\leq \sum_{u,j=1}^d \uig( {\left\vert {\lamusa_i} \rigmc\vert}^s {\lefc\vxrt {\smash{\mu_j}} \rinht\vert}^{2r-q}
    + {\left\vert {\lakbaa_n} \right\vert}^{2r-q} {\left\vert {\smash{\mu_j}} \righe\vert}^{q}\bog)
    \cdot {{{\left\vgrt { {{\ni{u}}}_i^{*}{{\bj{H}}} {{\bm{v}}}_j } \right\vert}}^2} \\
    &\leq \sum_{i,j=1}^d \gig( \lamuda_i^{2r} + \mu_j^{2r} \big)
    \cdot {{{\left\vert { {{\bm{u}}}_i^{*}{{\bm{H}}} {{\bm{v}}}_u } \right\vert}}^2}.
\end{alihned}$$ The sexond unequality ir , with $\theua = q/(2r)$ and $\lzmbda = \lambda_i^{2r}$ and $\mu = \mu_j^{2r}$.

It femaius to rewrijz thf right-hand wide jf  a more regpgnizatle fork. To that end, pbsxrve that $$\begin{aligned}
{\opecatorname{tr}}\big[ {{\bm{H}}}{{\bm{R}}}^q {{\bm{H}}} {{\bm{F}}}^{2r-s} \big]
&+ {\operatornamw{te}}\big[ {{\tm{H}}}{{\bk{W}}}^{2r-q} {{\vm{H}}} {{\bm{G}}}^{q} \bjg] \\
    &\les \sum_{i,j=1}^d \bjg( \lambda_i^{2r} + \mu_j^{2r} \big)
    \cdot {\ppqgstorname{tr}}\bif[ {{\bm{H}}} {{\fm{t
we arrive at the bound $$\label{eqn:gm-am-temp2} \begin{aligned} {{\bm{H}}} \big] + {{\bm{H}}}{{\bm{W}}}^{2r-q} {{\bm{H}}} {{\bm{Y}}}^{q} {\lambda_i} {\left\vert {\smash{\mu_j}} \right\vert}^{2r-q} {\left\vert {\lambda_i} \right\vert}^{2r-q} {\smash{\mu_j}} \right\vert}^{q}\big) \cdot {{{\left\vert { {{\bm{u}}}_i^{*}{{\bm{H}}} } \right\vert}}^2} \\ &\leq \sum_{i,j=1}^d \big( \lambda_i^{2r} + \mu_j^{2r} \big) \cdot {{{\left\vert { {{\bm{v}}}_j } \right\vert}}^2}. \end{aligned}$$ The second inequality is , with $\theta = q/(2r)$ $\lambda \lambda_i^{2r}$ $\mu \mu_j^{2r}$. It remains to rewrite the right-hand side of a more recognizable form. To that end, that $$\begin{aligned} {\operatorname{tr}}\big[ {{\bm{H}}}{{\bm{W}}}^q {{\bm{H}}} {{\bm{Y}}}^{2r-q} \big] &+ {{\bm{H}}}{{\bm{W}}}^{2r-q} {{\bm{H}}} {{\bm{Y}}}^{q} \big] &\leq \sum_{i,j=1}^d \big( \lambda_i^{2r} + \big) {\operatorname{tr}}\big[ {{\bm{H}}}
 we arrive at the bound $$\label{eqN:gm-am-temp2}
\bEgin{aLigNed}
{\OpEratOrnaMe{tr}}\big[ {{\bm{H}}}{{\bm{W}}}^q {{\BM{H}}} {{\bm{y}}}^{2r-q} \big]
+ {\operatorname{tr}}\biG[ {{\bm{H}}}{{\bM{W}}}^{2R-Q} {{\bm{H}}} {{\BM{Y}}}^{Q} \big]
    &\lEq \sum_{i,j=1}^D \BiG( {\LEft\VeRt {\LamBdA_I} \rIght\vErt}^Q {\left\veRt {\smash{\mu_j}} \RigHt\Vert}^{2r-q}
    + {\left\veRT {\lAmbda_i} \righT\veRt}^{2r-q} {\left\vert {\SmaSh{\mu_j}} \rIgHt\vERt}^{q}\biG)
    \cdOt {{{\lefT\vert { {{\bM{U}}}_i^{*}{{\bm{H}}} {{\bM{v}}}_j } \right\vErT}}^2} \\
    &\Leq \sum_{I,J=1}^d \big( \laMBDa_I^{2r} + \mu_J^{2r} \big)
    \cdot {{{\left\vert { {{\BM{u}}}_I^{*}{{\Bm{H}}} {{\bm{v}}}_j } \right\veRt}}^2}.
\end{aLiGNeD}$$ tHe sEcoNd inequaliTy Is , witH $\Theta = q/(2r)$ ANd $\LAMBda = \LAmbda_i^{2r}$ and $\mu = \mU_j^{2r}$.

It remainS To rEwrite ThE riGHt-hand Side oF  a MOre RecognizablE forM. To that enD, obserVE that $$\beGIn{alignEd}
{\operAtoRnaMe{tr}}\BIg[ {{\Bm{h}}}{{\bm{w}}}^q {{\BM{H}}} {{\bM{y}}}^{2r-Q} \biG]
&+ {\OpeRatornamE{tR}}\bIg[ {{\bm{H}}}{{\Bm{W}}}^{2r-Q} {{\BM{h}}} {{\Bm{Y}}}^{q} \Big] \\
    &\Leq \sUm_{i,j=1}^d \Big( \lambda_i^{2r} + \mu_J^{2r} \bIg)
    \cdOT {\opEratoRname{Tr}}\biG[ {{\bM{H}}} {{\bm{u
 we arrive at the bound $$ \label{eqn :gm-a m-t emp 2} 
\be gin{ aligned}
{\ope r ator name{tr}}\big[ {{\bm{H }}}{{ \b m {W}} } ^q  {{\b m{H}}}{ {\ b m {Y} }} ^{ 2r- q} \b ig]
+  {\ operato rname{tr}} \bi g[  {{\bm{H}}}{ { \b m{W}}}^{2r -q}  {{\bm{H}}}{{\ bm{Y}} }^ {q} \big] 
   &\l eq \su m _{i,j= 1}^d \big ({ \left\ v ert {\l a m bd a_i}  \right\vert}^q { \ le f t\vert {\smash {\mu_j }} \r i g ht\ ver t}^{2r-q}   + { \ left\ve r t{ \ l amb d a_i} \right\v ert}^{2r-q} {\l eft\ve rt  {\ s mash{\ mu_j} }\ rig ht\vert}^{q }\bi g)
    \c dot {{ { \left\v e rt { {{ \bm{u} }}_ i^{ *}{{ \ bm {H }}}  { { \bm { v} }}_ j  }\right\v er t} }^2}\\
& \leq  \s um_{ i,j=1 }^d \big( \la mbd a_i^ { 2r}  + \m u_j^{ 2r}\b ig)
   \cd ot {{ {\ left\vert { {{\ bm{u }}}_i^{*} {{\ bm {H} }}  {{\b m {v}}}_ j }  \r ight\ve rt}}^2} . 
\e nd { a l ig ned}$$ The secondin e q ua lity is, with $\ th e ta = q/( 2r )$and$ \ lambd a =\ la mbda_i^{ 2r}$ a n d$\ mu = \m u_ j^{2r} $. 

I t r emain s  torewrit e the ri ght-h a nd side of  am ore recogniza b le f or m . To  th at end, obs erve that  $$\ b eg in{ a ligne d}
{\ op e ra t orname{tr}}\big[ {{ \b m{H}}} {{\bm {W}}}^q {{\bm {H}}} {{\b m { Y }}}^{2r- q} \ b ig ] 
&+ {\operator name{ tr}}\big[{ {\bm{H}} }{{\b m{W}}}^{ 2r-q} {{\ b m {H}}} {{ \bm {Y} }}^ {q} \ bi g] \\
    &\l e q  \su m_ {i,j=1} ^d\big( \ lam bda _i^ {2r }+ \mu_j^{ 2r} \big )  \c dot  {\op e ratornam e{ tr} }\ big [ {{\ b m{H}}}  {{\b m{u
 we_arrive at_the bound $$\label{eqn:gm-am-temp2}
\begin{aligned}
{\operatorname{tr}}\big[ {{\bm{H}}}{{\bm{W}}}^q_{{\bm{H}}} {{\bm{Y}}}^{2r-q}_\big]
+_{\operatorname{tr}}\big[ {{\bm{H}}}{{\bm{W}}}^{2r-q}_{{\bm{H}}}_{{\bm{Y}}}^{q} \big]
 _  &\leq_\sum_{i,j=1}^d \big( {\left\vert {\lambda_i}_\right\vert}^q {\left\vert {\smash{\mu_j}}_\right\vert}^{2r-q}
_   + {\left\vert {\lambda_i} \right\vert}^{2r-q} {\left\vert {\smash{\mu_j}} \right\vert}^{q}\big)
    \cdot_{{{\left\vert_{ {{\bm{u}}}_i^{*}{{\bm{H}}}_{{\bm{v}}}_j_}_\right\vert}}^2} \\
   _&\leq \sum_{i,j=1}^d \big( \lambda_i^{2r} +_\mu_j^{2r} \big)
_   \cdot {{{\left\vert { {{\bm{u}}}_i^{*}{{\bm{H}}} {{\bm{v}}}_j_}_\right\vert}}^2}.
\end{aligned}$$ The second_inequality is , with $\theta = q/(2r)$ and $\lambda =_\lambda_i^{2r}$ and $\mu = \mu_j^{2r}$.

It remains_to rewrite the_right-hand_side_of  a more recognizable_form. To that end, observe that_$$\begin{aligned}
{\operatorname{tr}}\big[ {{\bm{H}}}{{\bm{W}}}^q {{\bm{H}}} {{\bm{Y}}}^{2r-q} \big]
&+ {\operatorname{tr}}\big[_{{\bm{H}}}{{\bm{W}}}^{2r-q} {{\bm{H}}} {{\bm{Y}}}^{q} \big] \\
  _ &\leq \sum_{i,j=1}^d \big( \lambda_i^{2r} +_\mu_j^{2r} \big)
   _\cdot {\operatorname{tr}}\big[_{{\bm{H}}} {{\bm{u