bottom) panel corresponds to the 2+2 (3+1) configuration.

The first orbital sampling method (lognormal orbital period and Rayleigh eccentricity distributions; see [Fig.]{}\[fig:IC\_comp\_per1\]) agrees reasonably with the MSC for periods $\gtrsim 10^3\,{\mathrm{d}}$. There is a clear excess of systems with inner periods between $\sim 1$ and $\sim 10^2\,{\mathrm{d}}$, as noted before by @2008MNRAS.389..925T. Evidently, our aim in §\[sect:pop\_syn\] is to establish whether tidal migration coupled with secular evolution can reproduce such an excess of short-period systems. The second sampling method (flat distributions in $\log_{10} a_i$ and the eccentricities; see [Fig.]{}\[fig:IC\_comp\_per2\]) compares less favourably to the MSC at periods $\gtrsim 10^3\,{\mathrm{d}}$, especially for the outermost orbits.

The median $m_1$ in the extracted sample of the MSC agrees with the assumed $m_1=1\,{\mathrm{M}_\odot}$ (see [Fig.]{}\[fig:IC\_comp\_m\]). The other observed masses, $m_2$, $m_3$ and $m_4$, tend to be somewhat larger than the sampled masses. However, we do not anticipate a very strong dependence of our results on the masses.

Population synthesis results {#sect:pop_syn}
============================

Here, we present the results from the population synthesis simulations. The initial conditions were discussed in §\[sect:IC\]. We first focus on the occurrences of tidal migration and other outcomes (§\[sect:pop\_syn:frac\]). We then consider the inner orbital period distributions mediated by tidal and secular evolution (§\[sect:pop\_syn:in\]). Other orbital properties are considered in §\[sect:pop\_syn:orb\], and in §\[sect:pop\_syn:time\] we discuss the migration times.

Outcome fractions {#sect:pop_syn:frac}
-----------------

  ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
                                                                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                                        
                                  NF       F      NF       F      NF       F      NF       F      NF       F      NF       F      
bottom) panel corresponds to the 2 + 2 (3 + 1) configuration. 

 The first orbital sample distribution method acting (lognormal orbital menstruation and Rayleigh eccentricity distributions; visualize [ Fig.]{}\[fig: IC\_comp\_per1\ ]) agree reasonably with the MSC for periods $ \gtrsim 10 ^ 3\,{\mathrm{d}}$. There be a absolved excess of organization with inner periods between $ \sim 1 $ and $ \sim 10 ^ 2\,{\mathrm{d}}$, as note before by @2008MNRAS.389.. 925T. Evidently, our aim in § \[sect: pop\_syn\ ] is to lay down whether tidal migration pair with secular evolution can reproduce such an excess of short - time period systems. The second sampling method (bland distributions in $ \log_{10 } a_i$ and the eccentricities; see [ Fig.]{}\[fig: IC\_comp\_per2\ ]) compares less favorably to the MSC at periods $ \gtrsim 10 ^ 3\,{\mathrm{d}}$, specially for the outermost orbits. 

 The median $ m_1 $ in the extracted sample distribution of the MSC agrees with the assumed $ m_1=1\,{\mathrm{M}_\odot}$ (see [ Fig.]{}\[fig: IC\_comp\_m\ ]). The other observed masses, $ m_2 $, $ m_3 $ and $ m_4 $, tend to be slightly larger than the sampled masses. However, we do not anticipate a very strong dependence of our results on the masses. 

 Population synthesis results { # faction: pop_syn } 
 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 

 Here, we salute the results from the population deduction model. The initial condition were discussed in § \[sect: IC\ ]. We first concentrate on the occurrences of tidal migration and other outcomes (§ \[sect: pop\_syn: frac\ ]). We then consider the inside orbital period distributions mediated by tidal and secular evolution (§ \[sect: pop\_syn: in\ ]). Other orbital properties are considered in § \[sect: pop\_syn: orb\ ], and in § \[sect: pop\_syn: time\ ] we discuss the migration times. 

 Outcome fractions { # faction: pop_syn: frac } 
 ----------------- 

   ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- 
                                                                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                                        
                                   NF        F       NF        F       NF        F       NF        F       NF        F       NF        F
bothom) panel corresponds to the 2+2 (3+1) configurcrion.

Thx first orbital sampling method (lognormal ocbitql peeiod and Rayleigh eccevtricity fistriburionw; see [Fig.]{}\[fij:JC\_comp\_pcx1\]) agrscs recsinably with thg MSC for pesiods $\gtrsim 10^3\,{\mdtfrl{d}}$. There is a clear excess of systeis with ijner periods bgtweem $\sim 1$ and $\sim 10^2\,{\mathrm{d}}$, as noted before gy @2008MNRAV.389..925T. Evidently, pur aim in §\[sect:pop\_syn\] is tl eshablish whether tifal migratiin cjypled with sdcular evolution can rgproduce such an excess of short-oeriob systems. Tye sefmnd samplinj methjd (flat distvpbutionv in $\lob_{10} a_i$ and the egcentciciries; see [Fig.]{}\[fig:IC\_comp\_'er2\]) compares less fadourably do the MSC at perioes $\gtrshm 10^3\,{\mdthro{e}}$, erpediellg for hhe outermost orbits.

The nedian $m_1$ in the exttasnrd sample of the MFC agrees with the assumed $m_1=1\,{\mathrm{M}_\odot}$ (ste [Fif.]{}\[fig:IC\_comp\_m\]). The other ovserved masses, $m_2$, $m_3$ anf $m_4$, tend eo be somewhat larger than the sampled masses. Howaver, xe do njg ajticipate a very strong dependence of our restmtx pn the masses.

Pjpulation sunhhrfis results {#sgct:pop_svh}
============================

Hsre, we present the resultf fron the poptlatoon synthesis simulations. Tye initial cjbditions were discbssed in §\[secc:IC\]. We firsy focus on the occurrenees of tidal migrwtion and uther outcomes (§\[sdct:iop\_sfn:frac\]). Wt then consider thq inner ocbitak perioa dixtribueions mediwted nf tidal and seculag evopudion (§\[sect:plp\_syn:in\]). Other orbital properties are considergd hn §\[vect:pop\_svn:orb\], snd in §\[sect:po[\_syn:time\] we dixcuss tke migfation timvs.

Outcome fractions {#fect:pop_syn:fraw}
-----------------

  ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
                                                                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                                        
                                  NF       F      NF       F      NF       F      NF       F      NG       F      VF       F      
bottom) panel corresponds to the 2+2 (3+1) first sampling method orbital period and agrees with the MSC periods $\gtrsim 10^3\,{\mathrm{d}}$. is a clear excess of systems inner periods between $\sim 1$ and $\sim 10^2\,{\mathrm{d}}$, as noted before by @2008MNRAS.389..925T. our aim in §\[sect:pop\_syn\] is to establish whether tidal migration coupled with secular can such excess short-period systems. The second sampling method (flat distributions in $\log_{10} a_i$ and the eccentricities; see [Fig.]{}\[fig:IC\_comp\_per2\]) less favourably to the MSC at periods $\gtrsim especially for the outermost The median $m_1$ in the sample the MSC with assumed (see [Fig.]{}\[fig:IC\_comp\_m\]). The observed masses, $m_2$, $m_3$ and $m_4$, tend to be somewhat larger than the sampled masses. However, we not anticipate strong dependence our on masses. Population synthesis ============================ Here, we present the results synthesis simulations. The initial conditions were discussed in We first on the occurrences of tidal migration other outcomes (§\[sect:pop\_syn:frac\]). We then consider the inner period distributions mediated by tidal and secular evolution (§\[sect:pop\_syn:in\]). Other orbital properties are considered in in §\[sect:pop\_syn:time\] we discuss migration times. Outcome {#sect:pop_syn:frac} ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- NF NF F NF F NF F NF F NF F
bottom) panel corresponds to tHe 2+2 (3+1) configurAtion.

the FirSt OrbiTal sAmpling method (lOGnorMal orbital period and RayLeigh EcCEntrICiTy disTributiONs; SEE [FiG.]{}\[fIg:iC\_cOmP\_PeR1\]) agreEs rEasonabLy with the MsC fOr Periods $\gtrsiM 10^3\,{\MaThrm{d}}$. There Is a Clear excess oF syStems wItH inNEr perIodS betwEen $\sim 1$ ANd $\sim 10^2\,{\mAthrm{d}}$, as nOtED beforE By @2008MNRAS.389..925t. eViDentLy, our aim in §\[sect:pop\_SYn\] IS to establish whEther tIdAL mIGRatIon Coupled witH sEculaR EvolutiON cAN REprODuce such an excEss of short-pERioD systeMs. the SEcond sAmpliNg MEthOd (flat distrIbutIons in $\log_{10} A_i$ and tHE eccentRIcities; See [Fig.]{}\[Fig:iC\_cOmp\_pER2\]) cOmParEs LEss FAvOurABly To the MSC At PeRiods $\GtrsIM 10^3\,{\MAThrm{D}}$, esPeciAlly fOr the outermosT orBits.

tHe mEdian $M_1$ in thE extRaCted sAmple oF the MsC Agrees with the asSumeD $m_1=1\,{\mathrm{M}_\OdoT}$ (sEe [FIg.]{}\[Fig:IC\_COmp\_m\]). ThE otHer ObserveD masses, $M_2$, $M_3$ anD $m_4$, TEND tO be somewhat larger tHaN THe Sampled mAsses. HOWeVeR, We do not aNtIciPate A VEry stRong DEpEndence oF our reSUlTs On the maSsEs.

PopuLaTioN syNthesIS resUlts {#seCt:pop_syn}
============================

here, wE Present the resuLTs from the popuLAtION sYNtheSis Simulations. the iNItiaL conDItIonS Were dIscusSeD In §\[SEct:IC\]. We first focus on ThE occurRenceS of tidal migraTion and othER OUtcomes (§\[sEct:pOP\_sYN:frac\]). We then conSider The inner orBItal periOd disTributioNs mediateD BY tidal anD seCulAr eVolUTIoN (§\[sect:pop\_syn:in\]). oTHer oRbItal proPerTies are ConSidEreD in §\[SeCt:pop\_syn:oRb\], and in §\[sEcT:pOp\_SyN:tiMe\] we dIScuss the MiGraTiOn tImes.

OUTcome fRactiOns {#sEcT:pOP_syN:frac}
-----------------

  ----------------------------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
                                                                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                                        
                                  NF       f      nF       f      nf       F      NF       f      Nf       F      nF       F      
bottom) panel correspondsto the 2+2  (3+1 ) c onf ig urat ion. 

The first or b ital  sampling method (logn ormal  o r bita l  p eriod  and Ra y le i g h e cc en tri ci t ydistr ibu tions;see [Fig.] {}\ [f ig:IC\_comp\ _ pe r1\]) agre esreasonably w ith  the M SC  fo r  peri ods  $\gt rsim 1 0 ^3\,{\ mathrm{d} }$ .  There is a cl e a rexce ss of systems wit h  i n ner periods be tween$\ s im 1 $ a nd$\sim 10^2 \, {\mat h rm{d}}$ ,  a s n ote d  before by @2 008MNRAS.38 9 ..9 25T. E vi den t ly, ou r aim  i n  §\ [sect:pop\_ syn\ ] is to e stabli s h wheth e r tidal  migra tio n c oupl e dwi thse c ula r  e vol u tio n can re pr od uce s ucha n e xces s o f sh ort-p eriod systems . T he s e con d sam pling  met ho d (fl at dis tribu ti ons in $\log_{1 0} a _i$ and t heec cen tr iciti e s; see  [F ig. ]{}\[fi g:IC\_c o mp\ _p e r 2 \] ) compares less fa vo u r ab ly to th e MSCa tpe r iods $\g tr sim  10^ 3 \ ,{\ma thrm { d} }$, espe cially fo rthe out er most o rb its .
The m e dian  $m_1$  in theextra c ted sample oft he MSC agrees wi t h  t h e as sum ed $m_1=1\, {\ma t hrm{ M}_\ o do t}$ (see[Fig. ]{ } \[ f ig:IC\_comp\_m\]).Th e othe r obs erved masses,  $m_2$, $m _ 3 $  and $m_ 4$,t en d  to be somewha t lar ger than t h e sample d mas ses. How ever, wed o  not ant ici pat e a  ve r y  s trong depende n c e of  o ur resu lts  on the  ma sse s.
Po pu lation sy nthesisre su lt s{#s ect:p o p_syn}
= == === == === ===== = ====== ===== 

He re ,w e p resentt he r esul ts  f romthe  p opula tion syn thesissimulatio ns. Thein it ial con ditions weredi scussed in  § \[s ect:IC \ ] . We fir st focus on the occurre n ces oftid al mi grat ion and o the r outc ome s  (§\[s ect:po p\_sy n: fra c \ ]). W e th enco nsider the i nne r orb it al p eriod d istributions media t edby tidal andsec ular e vo lut i on (§\ [s e ct: p o p\_syn:in\]). O ther orbit al pr operties a r e c on sidered  in §\[ sect: p op\_syn :orb\], a nd in §\[ se ct:p o p \_s yn:time\]we discu ss the mi g ratio n  t imes. 

O utcome  f rac tions  {#sec t :po p_syn :frac} 
- ------ ----- -- ---

  - ----------------------- ---------- --------- - --- - --------- - ---- -- -------  -- --- -- -- --- - - --- ---- -- --- - - --- ---- ------- - - -- --- - -- ---- ------ - - --- ---
                                                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
                            NF   F     N F       F     NF      F   N F     F    NF      F    NF       F      
bottom) panel_corresponds to_the 2+2 (3+1) configuration.

The_first orbital_sampling_method (lognormal_orbital_period and Rayleigh_eccentricity distributions; see_[Fig.]{}\[fig:IC\_comp\_per1\]) agrees reasonably with_the MSC for_periods_$\gtrsim 10^3\,{\mathrm{d}}$. There is a clear excess of systems with inner periods between $\sim_1$_and $\sim_10^2\,{\mathrm{d}}$,_as_noted before by @2008MNRAS.389..925T. Evidently,_our aim in §\[sect:pop\_syn\] is_to establish_whether tidal migration coupled with secular evolution can_reproduce_such an excess_of short-period systems. The second sampling method (flat distributions_in $\log_{10} a_i$ and the eccentricities;_see [Fig.]{}\[fig:IC\_comp\_per2\]) compares_less_favourably_to the MSC at_periods $\gtrsim 10^3\,{\mathrm{d}}$, especially for the_outermost orbits.

The median $m_1$ in the_extracted sample of the MSC agrees with_the assumed $m_1=1\,{\mathrm{M}_\odot}$ (see [Fig.]{}\[fig:IC\_comp\_m\]). The_other observed masses, $m_2$, $m_3$_and $m_4$,_tend to be somewhat larger_than the sampled_masses. However,_we do not_anticipate a very strong dependence of_our results on_the masses.

Population synthesis results {#sect:pop_syn}
============================

Here, we_present_the results from_the_population_synthesis simulations._The initial conditions_were_discussed in_§\[sect:IC\]._We first focus on the occurrences_of_tidal migration and other outcomes (§\[sect:pop\_syn:frac\]). We_then consider the inner_orbital_period distributions mediated by_tidal and secular evolution (§\[sect:pop\_syn:in\])._Other orbital properties are considered in_§\[sect:pop\_syn:orb\], and_in §\[sect:pop\_syn:time\]_we discuss the migration times.

Outcome fractions {#sect:pop_syn:frac}
-----------------

  ----------------------------- ------- -------_------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------_------- ------- ------- -------_------- -------_-------_-------
  __ _      _ _     _   __     _     _    ___    _     _  _      __     __     ___    _     _        _  _    ___         _ _  _         _      _        
  _       _      _   __      ____  _  _  _ _  _ _  __                 _     _    __  _   _       _        __ _   _ _ _  _ _ _ _      __        ____  _  
_  _  __     _  _   _         _                _ _   _ __     _ _       __           ___  __     _____     _      __    _ __   _   _          __ ____   
_              __    _     __   _       _    _   _                    _    _    _  __  _   _       _                 _      _  _ _        _          _  
           __     _     _   _   __NF  _ _  F _   _NF       F_  _  NF       F _    NF       F      NF   _  _F_     NF      _F _    