1+\frac{\epsilon}{2}.$$ With this choice, $\delta_0$ in depends only on $\epsilon$. Thus we have to verify that $$\left(\frac{1}{\log|\log{|t|}|}+|c|\right)^{\frac{1}{k}} \leq |\log|t||^{\frac{\epsilon}{2}},$$ but this obviously holds for small $|t|$ since the left-hand side is bounded. Hence $\tilde{\Omega} \subset \Omega$ and $(0,0)$ is an irregular boundary point for $\Omega$ as well.

This implies that the upper Perron solution $\overline{H}_f$ does not always attain the boundary values at $(0, 0)$.

Barrier Families {#sec:appa}
================

In this Section, a sub/supersolution is a viscosity sub/supersolution of $$\label{eq:infinity_heat}
u_t -\Delta_{\infty}u = u_t -\sum_{i, j=1}^{n}u_{x_i}u_{x_ix_j}u_{x_j} =0,$$ the usual, non-normalised $\infty$- heat equation. Further, the upper and lower classes $\mathcal{U}_f$ and $\mathcal{L}_f$, and the Upper and Lower Perron solutions $\overline{H}_f$ and $\underline{H}_f$, now also refer to. As before, the boundary function $f$ is assumed to be continuous.

Note that if $u$ is a radial function $u(x, t)=G(|x|, t)$, then reads $$G_t(r, t)-G_r(r, t)^2G_{rr}(r, t)=0.$$ Also, if $u$ is a sub/supersolution to, then $-u$ is a\
super/subsolution.

The following definition is found in [@Bjorn2015]:

\[def:stronk\_barrier\] Let $\zeta_0 =(x_0, t_0) \in \partial \Omega$. A family of functions $\{w_j\}_j $ in $\Omega$ is called a *barrier family* in $\Omega$ at the point $\zeta_0$ if, for every $j$,

1.  $w_j>0$ and $w_j$ a supers
1+\frac{\epsilon}{2}.$$ With this choice, $ \delta_0 $ in depends only on $ \epsilon$. Thus we get to control that $ $ \left(\frac{1}{\log|\log{|t|}|}+|c|\right)^{\frac{1}{k } } \leq |\log|t||^{\frac{\epsilon}{2}},$$ but this obviously holds for small $ |t|$ since the left - handwriting side is bounded. therefore $ \tilde{\Omega } \subset \Omega$ and $ (0,0)$ is an irregular boundary point for $ \Omega$ as well. 

 This imply that the upper Perron solution $ \overline{H}_f$ does not always attain the boundary value at $ (0, 0)$. 

 Barrier Families { # sec: appa } 
 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 

 In this Section, a sub / supersolution is a viscosity submarine / supersolution of $ $ \label{eq: infinity_heat } 
 u_t -\Delta_{\infty}u = u_t -\sum_{i, j=1}^{n}u_{x_i}u_{x_ix_j}u_{x_j } = 0,$$ the common, non - normalised $ \infty$- heat equality. Further, the upper and humble class $ \mathcal{U}_f$ and $ \mathcal{L}_f$, and the Upper and Lower Perron solutions $ \overline{H}_f$ and $ \underline{H}_f$, now also refer to. As ahead, the boundary function $ f$ is assumed to be continuous. 

 Note that if $ u$ is a radial function $ u(x, t)=G(|x|, t)$, then read $ $ G_t(r, t)-G_r(r, t)^2G_{rr}(r, t)=0.$$ Also, if $ u$ is a sub / supersolution to, then $ -u$ is a\ 
 super / subsolution. 

 The following definition is found in [ @Bjorn2015 ]: 

 \[def: stronk\_barrier\ ] lease $ \zeta_0 =( x_0, t_0) \in \partial \Omega$. A family of functions $ \{w_j\}_j $ in $ \Omega$ is called a * barrier family * in $ \Omega$ at the point $ \zeta_0 $ if, for every $ j$, 

 1.   $ w_j>0 $ and $ w_j$ a supers
1+\fraf{\epsilon}{2}.$$ With this choict, $\delta_0$ in depends only mn $\epsjlon$. Thur we have to verify that $$\lefv(\frax{1}{\log|\lig{|t|}|}+|c|\right)^{\frac{1}{k}} \leq |\log|g||^{\frac{\epsipon}{2}},$$ but rhis ibviously iklds fov smamp $|t|$ vmnce the left-hakd side is tounded. Hence $\diudz{\Omega} \subset \Omega$ and $(0,0)$ is an irregtlar boinfary point for $\Omebw$ as well.

This implies that the upper Psrron smlution $\overlone{H}_f$ does not always attaln tje boundary values at $(0, 0)$.

Barriet Faiulies {#sec:appx}
================

In this Stccion, a sub/sopersolution is a viscosity sub/sjpersplution of $$\lqbep{gq:infinity_heet}
u_t -\Dvlta_{\infty}u = u_b -\sum_{i, b=1}^{n}u_{x_i}u_{x_ox_j}u_{x_j} =0,$$ the usmal, nmn-nirmalised $\infty$- heat xquation. Further, the upper ang mower classes $\matycql{U}_f$ dnd $\kathzql{L}_w$, ahd tge Uppfr end Lower Psrron solutuons $\overline{H}_f$ and $\ugeerline{H}_f$, now also weser to. As before, the boundary function $x$ ia assumed to be continuius.

Note that if $u$ is w radial sunction $u(x, t)=G(|x|, t)$, then reads $$G_t(r, t)-G_r(r, t)^2G_{rr}(r, t)=0.$$ Alsm, if $n$ ks c sub/sjpegsolution to, then $-u$ is a\
super/subsolution.

The fjmlpwpng definition is found in [@Bkogn2015]:

\[cgf:stronk\_barriet\] Let $\zzfa_0 =(x_0, t_0) \in \partial \Omfga$. A fwmily of functyons $\{w_j\}_j $ in $\Omega$ is called a *varrier famijt* in $\Omega$ at the 'oint $\zeta_0$ iy, for gvery $k$,

1.  $w_j>0$ and $w_j$ a supers
1+\frac{\epsilon}{2}.$$ With this choice, $\delta_0$ in depends $\epsilon$. we have verify that $$\left(\frac{1}{\log|\log{|t|}|}+|c|\right)^{\frac{1}{k}} holds small $|t|$ since left-hand side is Hence $\tilde{\Omega} \subset \Omega$ and $(0,0)$ an irregular boundary point for $\Omega$ as well. This implies that the upper solution $\overline{H}_f$ does not always attain the boundary values at $(0, 0)$. Barrier {#sec:appa} In Section, sub/supersolution is a viscosity sub/supersolution of $$\label{eq:infinity_heat} u_t -\Delta_{\infty}u = u_t -\sum_{i, j=1}^{n}u_{x_i}u_{x_ix_j}u_{x_j} =0,$$ the usual, $\infty$- heat equation. Further, the upper and lower $\mathcal{U}_f$ and $\mathcal{L}_f$, and Upper and Lower Perron solutions and now also to. before, boundary function $f$ assumed to be continuous. Note that if $u$ is a radial function $u(x, t)=G(|x|, t)$, then reads t)-G_r(r, t)^2G_{rr}(r, if $u$ a to, $-u$ is a\ following definition is found in [@Bjorn2015]: =(x_0, t_0) \in \partial \Omega$. A family of $\{w_j\}_j $ $\Omega$ is called a *barrier family* $\Omega$ at the point $\zeta_0$ if, for every 1. $w_j>0$ and $w_j$ a supers
1+\frac{\epsilon}{2}.$$ With this choice, $\Delta_0$ in depEnds oNly On $\ePsIlon$. thus We have to verify THat $$\lEft(\frac{1}{\log|\log{|t|}|}+|c|\right)^{\frAc{1}{k}} \leQ |\lOG|t||^{\frAC{\ePsiloN}{2}},$$ but thiS ObVIOusLy HoLds FoR SmAll $|t|$ sIncE the lefT-hand side iS boUnDed. Hence $\tildE{\omEga} \subset \OMegA$ and $(0,0)$ is an irreGulAr bounDaRy pOInt foR $\OmEga$ as Well.

ThIS impliEs that the UpPEr PerrON solutiON $\OvErliNe{H}_f$ does not always ATtAIn the boundary vAlues aT $(0, 0)$.

BARrIER FaMilIes {#sec:appa}
================

in This SECtion, a sUB/sUPERsoLUtion is a viscoSity sub/supeRSolUtion oF $$\lAbeL{Eq:infiNity_hEaT}
U_t -\DElta_{\infty}u = u_T -\sum_{I, j=1}^{n}u_{x_i}u_{x_iX_j}u_{x_j} =0,$$ tHE usual, nON-normalIsed $\inFty$- HeaT equATiOn. furThER, thE UpPer ANd lOwer clasSeS $\mAthcaL{U}_f$ aND $\MAThcaL{L}_f$, And tHe UppEr and Lower PerRon SoluTIonS $\overLine{H}_F$ and $\UnDerliNe{H}_f$, noW also ReFer to. As before, thE bouNdary funcTioN $f$ Is aSsUmed tO Be contInuOus.

note thaT if $u$ is a RAdiAl FUNCtIon $u(x, t)=G(|x|, t)$, then reads $$g_t(R, T)-g_r(R, t)^2G_{rr}(r, t)=0.$$ ALso, if $u$ IS a SuB/SupersolUtIon To, thEN $-U$ is a\
sUper/SUbSolution.

the folLOwInG definiTiOn is foUnD in [@bjoRn2015]:

\[def:STronK\_barriEr\] Let $\zetA_0 =(x_0, t_0) \in \PArtial \Omega$. A faMIly of functionS $\{W_j\}_J $ IN $\OMEga$ iS caLled a *barrieR famILy* in $\omegA$ At The POint $\zEta_0$ if, FoR EvERy $j$,

1.  $w_j>0$ and $w_j$ a supers
1+\frac{\epsilon}{2}.$$ Wi th this ch oice,  $\ del ta _0$in d epends only on $\ep silon$. Thus we have t o ver if y  tha t  $ $\lef t(\frac { 1} { \ log |\ lo g{| t| } |} +|c|\ rig ht)^{\f rac{1}{k}}  \l eq  |\log|t||^{ \ fr ac{\epsilo n}{ 2}},$$ but t his  obvio us lyh oldsfor  smal l $|t| $  since  the left -h a nd sid e  is bou n d ed . He nce $\tilde{\Omeg a }\ subset \Omega$  and $ (0 , 0) $ isanirregularbo undar y  pointf or $ \ Ome g a$ as well.
This implie s  th at the  u ppe r  Perro n sol ut i on$\overline{ H}_f $ does no t alwa y s attai n  the bo undary  va lue s at $( 0,  0) $. 
Ba r ri erF ami lies {#s ec :a ppa}==== = = = = ==== === =

I n thi s Section, asub /sup e rso lutio n isa vi sc osity  sub/s upers ol ution of $$\lab el{e q:infinit y_h ea t}u_ t -\D e lta_{\ inf ty} u = u_t  -\sum_ { i,j= 1 } ^ {n }u_{x_i}u_{x_ix_j} u_ { x _j } =0,$$the us u al ,n on-norma li sed  $\i n f ty$-heat eq uation.Furthe r ,th e upper  a nd low er  cl ass es $\ m athc al{U}_ f$ and $ \math c al{L}_f$, andt he Upper andL ow e r  P e rron  so lutions $\o verl i ne{H }_f$ an d $ \ under line{ H} _ f$ ,  now also refer to.  A s befo re, t he boundary f unction $f $ i s assume d to be continuous.

N ote t hat if $u$ is a rad ial f unction$u(x, t)= G ( |x|, t)$ , t hen  re ads $ $G _t(r, t)-G_r( r ,  t)^ 2G _{rr}(r , t )=0.$$Als o,if$u$  i s a sub/s upersolu ti on  t o,  th en $- u $ is a\su per /s ubs oluti o n.

Th e fol lowi ng  d e fin ition i s  f o u nd i n[@ Bjor n20 15 ]:

\ [def : str onk\_ba rrier\] L et$ \zet a_ 0=(x_0,t_0) \in \par ti al \Omega$ .A f amilyo f  functio ns $\{w_j\}_j $ in $\Om e ga$ iscal led a  *ba rrier fam ily * in $ \Om e ga$ at  the p oint$\ zet a _ 0$ if , fo r e ve ry $j$,

1 .  $w _j>0$  a nd $ w_j$ asupers
1+\frac{\epsilon}{2}.$$ With_this choice,_$\delta_0$ in depends only_on $\epsilon$._Thus_we have_to_verify that $$\left(\frac{1}{\log|\log{|t|}|}+|c|\right)^{\frac{1}{k}}_\leq |\log|t||^{\frac{\epsilon}{2}},$$ but_this obviously holds for_small $|t|$ since_the_left-hand side is bounded. Hence $\tilde{\Omega} \subset \Omega$ and $(0,0)$ is an irregular boundary_point_for $\Omega$_as_well.

This_implies that the upper Perron_solution $\overline{H}_f$ does not always_attain the_boundary values at $(0, 0)$.

Barrier Families {#sec:appa}
================

In this_Section,_a sub/supersolution is_a viscosity sub/supersolution of $$\label{eq:infinity_heat}
u_t -\Delta_{\infty}u = u_t -\sum_{i,_j=1}^{n}u_{x_i}u_{x_ix_j}u_{x_j} =0,$$ the usual, non-normalised $\infty$-_heat equation. Further,_the_upper_and lower classes $\mathcal{U}_f$_and $\mathcal{L}_f$, and the Upper and_Lower Perron solutions $\overline{H}_f$ and $\underline{H}_f$,_now also refer to. As before, the_boundary function $f$ is assumed to_be continuous.

Note that if $u$_is a_radial function $u(x, t)=G(|x|, t)$,_then reads $$G_t(r,_t)-G_r(r, t)^2G_{rr}(r,_t)=0.$$ Also, if_$u$ is a sub/supersolution to, then_$-u$ is a\
super/subsolution.

The_following definition is found in [@Bjorn2015]:

\[def:stronk\_barrier\]_Let_$\zeta_0 =(x_0, t_0)_\in_\partial_\Omega$. A_family of functions_$\{w_j\}_j_$ in_$\Omega$_is called a *barrier family* in_$\Omega$_at the point $\zeta_0$ if, for every_$j$,

1.  $w_j>0$ and_$w_j$_a supers