 steps, when $(H,K)$ is a generalized strong Shoda pair of $G$. Let us elaborate on how to proceed by steps. If $(H,K)$ is a generalized strong Shoda pair of $G$, $H=H_{0}\leq H_{1}\leq \cdots \leq H_{n}=G$ is a strong inductive chain from $H$ to $G$ and $\mathcal{C}\in \mathcal{C}_{q}(H/K)$, set $$\varepsilon_{\mathcal{C}}^{(0)}(H,K) = \varepsilon_{\mathcal{C}}(H,K),$$ $$\varepsilon_{\mathcal{C}}^{(1)}(H,K)={\rm~the~sum~of~all~the~distinct~}H_{1}{\rm {\operatorname{-}} conjugates~of~}\varepsilon_{\mathcal{C}}^{(0)}(H,K),$$ $$\varepsilon_{\mathcal{C}}^{(2)}(H,K)  ={\rm~the~sum~of~all~the~distinct~}H_{2}{\rm {\operatorname{-}} conjugates~of~}\varepsilon_{\mathcal{C}}^{(1)}(H,K),$$ and finally $$\varepsilon_{\mathcal{C}}^{(n)}(H,K)  ={\rm~the~sum~of~all~the~distinct~}H_{n}{\rm {\operatorname{-}} conjugates~of~}\varepsilon_{\mathcal{C}}^{(n-1)}(H,K).$$ Denote the final step $\varepsilon_{\mathcal{C}}^{(n)}(H,K) $ by $\mathfrak{e}_{\mathcal{C}}(G,H,K)$. Apparently, one thinks that the definition of $\mathfrak{e}_{\mathcal{C}}(G,H,K)$ depends on strong inductive chain from $H$ to $G$. However, we will see that this is not the case, i.e., the final step $\mathfrak{e}_{\mathcal{C}}(G,H,K)$ is invariant of strong inductive chain from $H$ to $G$ (see Remark \[r1\]). Observe that if $(H,K)$ is a strong Shoda pair of $G$, then $\mathfrak{e}_{\mathcal{C}}(G,H,K)= {e}_{\mathcal{C}}(G,H,K)$ on taking strong inductive chain: $H \leq G$.

[\[t1\]]{} Let $\mathbb{F}_{q}$ be a finite field of order $q$ and $
steps, when $ (H, K)$ is a generalized strong Shoda pair of $ G$. Let us complicate on how to continue by steps. If $ (H, K)$ is a generalized strong Shoda couple of $ G$, $ H = H_{0}\leq H_{1}\leq \cdots \leq H_{n}=G$ is a strong inductive range from $ H$ to $ G$ and $ \mathcal{C}\in \mathcal{C}_{q}(H / K)$, set $ $ \varepsilon_{\mathcal{C}}^{(0)}(H, K) = \varepsilon_{\mathcal{C}}(H, K),$$ $ $ \varepsilon_{\mathcal{C}}^{(1)}(H, K)={\rm ~ the ~ sum ~ of ~ all ~ the ~ distinct~}H_{1}{\rm { \operatorname{- } } conjugate ~ of~}\varepsilon_{\mathcal{C}}^{(0)}(H, K),$$ $ $ \varepsilon_{\mathcal{C}}^{(2)}(H, K)   = { \rm ~ the ~ sum ~ of ~ all ~ the ~ distinct~}H_{2}{\rm { \operatorname{- } } conjugates ~ of~}\varepsilon_{\mathcal{C}}^{(1)}(H, K),$$ and ultimately $ $ \varepsilon_{\mathcal{C}}^{(n)}(H, K)   = { \rm ~ the ~ sum ~ of ~ all ~ the ~ distinct~}H_{n}{\rm { \operatorname{- } } conjugates ~ of~}\varepsilon_{\mathcal{C}}^{(n-1)}(H, K).$$ Denote the concluding step $ \varepsilon_{\mathcal{C}}^{(n)}(H, K) $ by $ \mathfrak{e}_{\mathcal{C}}(G, H, K)$. Apparently, one thinks that the definition of $ \mathfrak{e}_{\mathcal{C}}(G, H, K)$ depends on solid inductive chain from $ H$ to $ G$. However, we will visualize that this is not the case, i.e., the final measure $ \mathfrak{e}_{\mathcal{C}}(G, H, K)$ is invariant of strong inductive chain from $ H$ to $ G$ (learn Remark \[r1\ ]). Observe that if $ (H, K)$ is a strong Shoda pair of $ G$, then $ \mathfrak{e}_{\mathcal{C}}(G, H, K)= { e}_{\mathcal{C}}(G, H, K)$ on taking potent inductive chain: $ H \leq G$. 

 [ \[t1\ ] ] { } Let $ \mathbb{F}_{q}$ be a finite field of order $ q$ and $
 stfps, when $(H,K)$ is a generallzed strong Shodc pair mf $G$. Lst us elxborate on how to proceed by sreps. Uf $(H,K)$ is a generalized strong Sjoda paie of $T$, $H=H_{0}\leq H_{1}\lxs \cdots \leq H_{h}=N$ is c wtrong inductiye chain frmm $H$ to $G$ and $\kagheal{C}\in \mathcal{C}_{q}(H/K)$, set $$\varepsilon_{\matrcal{C}}^{(0)}(H,K) = \garepsilon_{\mathsal{C}}(N,H),$$ $$\vadvpwilon_{\mathcal{C}}^{(1)}(H,K)={\rm~the~sum~of~all~tge~distiict~}H_{1}{\rm {\operatormame{-}} conjugates~of~}\varepsiloj_{\matjcal{C}}^{(0)}(H,K),$$ $$\varepsilon_{\lathcal{C}}^{(2)}(H,K)  ={\rm~trw~sum~of~all~the~aistinct~}H_{2}{\rm {\operatornaje{-}} conjugates~of~}\varepsilon_{\mathcau{C}}^{(1)}(H,K),$$ cnd finally $$\vqreovilon_{\mathcao{C}}^{(n)}(H,K)  ={\rm~the~sum~of~all~the~divtinct~}H_{m}{\rm {\operatornake{-}} ronjygates~of~}\varepsilon_{\matical{C}}^{(n-1)}(H,K).$$ Denote the sinal ste[ $\rarepsilon_{\mathcal{C}}^{(n)}(H,K) $ vy $\majhfran{e}_{\magycau{C}}(G,G,K)$. Alparenhly, one thinka that the eefinition of $\mathftah{v}_{\kathcal{C}}(G,H,K)$ sependf jn strong inductive chain from $H$ to $G$. Hmweber, we will see that thus is not the case, i.e., the finaj step $\mathfrak{e}_{\mathcal{C}}(G,H,K)$ is invariant of stronc indncgivt gmain drlm $H$ to $G$ (see Remark \[r1\]). Observe that if $(H,K)$ is w surokg Shoda pair of $G$, then $\matnfgal{g}_{\mathcal{C}}(G,H,K)= {e}_{\oathcal{C}}(G,G,K)$ on taking stronh inducjive cyain: $H \lez G$.

[\[t1\]]{} Let $\mathbb{F}_{q}$ be a finite fueld of ordeg $q$ qnd $
steps, when $(H,K)$ is a generalized strong of Let us on how to is generalized strong Shoda of $G$, $H=H_{0}\leq \cdots \leq H_{n}=G$ is a strong chain from $H$ to $G$ and $\mathcal{C}\in \mathcal{C}_{q}(H/K)$, set $$\varepsilon_{\mathcal{C}}^{(0)}(H,K) = \varepsilon_{\mathcal{C}}(H,K),$$ $$\varepsilon_{\mathcal{C}}^{(1)}(H,K)={\rm~the~sum~of~all~the~distinct~}H_{1}{\rm conjugates~of~}\varepsilon_{\mathcal{C}}^{(0)}(H,K),$$ $$\varepsilon_{\mathcal{C}}^{(2)}(H,K) ={\rm~the~sum~of~all~the~distinct~}H_{2}{\rm {\operatorname{-}} conjugates~of~}\varepsilon_{\mathcal{C}}^{(1)}(H,K),$$ and finally $$\varepsilon_{\mathcal{C}}^{(n)}(H,K) ={\rm~the~sum~of~all~the~distinct~}H_{n}{\rm {\operatorname{-}} conjugates~of~}\varepsilon_{\mathcal{C}}^{(n-1)}(H,K).$$ Denote the step $ $\mathfrak{e}_{\mathcal{C}}(G,H,K)$. one thinks that the definition of $\mathfrak{e}_{\mathcal{C}}(G,H,K)$ depends on strong inductive chain from $H$ to $G$. we will see that this is not the i.e., the final step is invariant of strong inductive from to $G$ Remark Observe if $(H,K)$ is strong Shoda pair of $G$, then $\mathfrak{e}_{\mathcal{C}}(G,H,K)= {e}_{\mathcal{C}}(G,H,K)$ on taking strong inductive chain: $H \leq G$. [\[t1\]]{} $\mathbb{F}_{q}$ be field of $q$ $
 steps, when $(H,K)$ is a generalized Strong ShodA pair Of $G$. let Us ElabOratE on how to proceeD By stEps. If $(H,K)$ is a generalized sTrong shODa paIR oF $G$, $H=H_{0}\lEq H_{1}\leq \cDOtS \LEq H_{N}=G$ Is A stRoNG iNductIve Chain frOm $H$ to $G$ and $\mAthCaL{C}\in \mathcal{C}_{Q}(h/K)$, Set $$\varepsiLon_{\Mathcal{C}}^{(0)}(H,K) = \vaRepSilon_{\mAtHcaL{c}}(H,K),$$ $$\vaRepSilon_{\MathcaL{c}}^{(1)}(H,K)={\rm~tHe~sum~of~alL~tHE~distiNCt~}H_{1}{\rm {\opERAtOrnaMe{-}} conjugates~of~}\varEPsILon_{\mathcal{C}}^{(0)}(H,K),$$ $$\vArepsiLoN_{\MaTHCal{c}}^{(2)}(H,K)  ={\Rm~the~sum~of~AlL~the~dIStinct~}H_{2}{\RM {\oPERAtoRName{-}} conjugateS~of~}\varepsilON_{\maThcal{C}}^{(1)}(h,K),$$ And FInally $$\VarepSiLOn_{\mAthcal{C}}^{(n)}(H,K)  ={\rM~the~Sum~of~all~tHe~distINct~}H_{n}{\rm {\OPeratorName{-}} coNjuGatEs~of~}\VArEpSilOn_{\MAthCAl{c}}^{(n-1)}(H,k).$$ denOte the fiNaL sTep $\vaRepsILON_{\MathCal{c}}^{(n)}(H,K) $ By $\matHfrak{e}_{\mathcal{c}}(G,H,k)$. AppARenTly, onE thinKs thAt The deFinitiOn of $\mAtHfrak{e}_{\mathcal{C}}(G,h,K)$ dePends on stRonG iNduCtIve chAIn from $h$ to $g$. HoWever, we Will see THat ThIS IS nOt the case, i.e., the finaL sTEP $\mAthfrak{e}_{\MathcaL{c}}(G,h,K)$ IS invariaNt Of sTronG INductIve cHAiN from $H$ to $g$ (see ReMArK \[r1\]). observe ThAt if $(H,K)$ Is A stRonG ShodA Pair Of $G$, theN $\mathfraK{e}_{\matHCal{C}}(G,H,K)= {e}_{\mathcaL{c}}(G,H,K)$ on taking sTRoNG InDUctiVe cHain: $H \leq G$.

[\[t1\]]{} LEt $\maTHbb{F}_{Q}$ be a FInIte FIeld oF ordeR $q$ ANd $
 steps, when $(H,K)$ is ageneralize d str ong  Sh od a pa ir o f $G$. Let use labo rate on how to proceed  by s te p s. I f  $ (H,K) $ is ag en e r ali ze dstr on g  S hodapai r of $G $, $H=H_{0 }\l eq  H_{1}\leq \ c do ts \leq H_ {n} =G$ is a str ong  induc ti vec hainfro m $H$  to $G $  and $ \mathcal{ C} \ in \ma t hcal{C} _ { q} (H/K )$, set $$\vareps i lo n _{\mathcal{C}} ^{(0)} (H , K) =  \v are psilon_{\m at hcal{ C }}(H,K) , $$ $ $ \va r epsilon_{\mat hcal{C}}^{( 1 )}( H,K)={ \r m~t h e~sum~ of~al l~ t he~ distinct~}H _{1} {\rm {\op erator n ame{-}} conjuga tes~of ~}\ var epsi l on _{ \ma th c al{ C }} ^{( 0 )}( H,K),$$$$ \v areps ilon _ { \ m athc al{ C}}^ {(2)} (H,K)  ={\rm~ the ~sum ~ of~ all~t he~di stin ct ~}H_{ 2}{\rm  {\op er atorname{-}} co njug ates~of~} \va re psi lo n_{\m a thcal{ C}} ^{( 1)}(H,K ),$$ an d  fi na l l y  $ $\varepsilon_{\mat hc a l {C }}^{(n)} (H,K)={ \r m ~the~sum ~o f~a ll~t h e ~dist inct ~ }H _{n}{\rm  {\ope r at or name{-} }conjug at es~ of~ }\var e psil on_{\m athcal{C }}^{( n -1)}(H,K).$$ D e note the fina l  s t e p$ \var eps ilon_{\math cal{ C }}^{ (n)} ( H, K)$  by $ \math fr a k{ e }_{\mathcal{C}}(G,H ,K )$. Ap paren tly, one thin ks that th e d efinitio n of $\ m athfrak{e}_{\m athca l{C}}(G,H, K )$ depen ds on  stronginductive c hain fro m $ H$to$G$ . Ho wever, we wil l seeth at this  is  not th e c ase , i .e. ,the final  step $\ ma th fr ak {e} _{\ma t hcal{C}} (G ,H, K) $ i s inv a riantof st rong  i nd u cti ve chai n  f r o m $H $to  $G$  (s ee  Rema rk \ [ r1\ ]). Obs erve that  if $(H, K) $is a st rong Shoda pa ir  of $G$, t he n $ \mathf r a k{e}_{\m athcal{C}}(G,H,K)= {e}_ { \mathca l{C }}(G, H,K) $ on taki ngstrong  in d uctive  chain : $H\l eqG $ .

[\ [ t 1\ ]]{ }Let $\math b b {F} _{q}$  b e afinitefield of order $q$ and  $
 steps,_when $(H,K)$_is a generalized strong_Shoda pair_of_$G$. Let_us_elaborate on how_to proceed by_steps. If $(H,K)$ is_a generalized strong_Shoda_pair of $G$, $H=H_{0}\leq H_{1}\leq \cdots \leq H_{n}=G$ is a strong inductive chain from_$H$_to $G$_and_$\mathcal{C}\in_\mathcal{C}_{q}(H/K)$, set $$\varepsilon_{\mathcal{C}}^{(0)}(H,K) = \varepsilon_{\mathcal{C}}(H,K),$$_$$\varepsilon_{\mathcal{C}}^{(1)}(H,K)={\rm~the~sum~of~all~the~distinct~}H_{1}{\rm {\operatorname{-}} conjugates~of~}\varepsilon_{\mathcal{C}}^{(0)}(H,K),$$ $$\varepsilon_{\mathcal{C}}^{(2)}(H,K) _={\rm~the~sum~of~all~the~distinct~}H_{2}{\rm {\operatorname{-}}_conjugates~of~}\varepsilon_{\mathcal{C}}^{(1)}(H,K),$$ and finally $$\varepsilon_{\mathcal{C}}^{(n)}(H,K)  ={\rm~the~sum~of~all~the~distinct~}H_{n}{\rm {\operatorname{-}} conjugates~of~}\varepsilon_{\mathcal{C}}^{(n-1)}(H,K).$$_Denote_the final step_$\varepsilon_{\mathcal{C}}^{(n)}(H,K) $ by $\mathfrak{e}_{\mathcal{C}}(G,H,K)$. Apparently, one thinks that the_definition of $\mathfrak{e}_{\mathcal{C}}(G,H,K)$ depends on strong_inductive chain from_$H$_to_$G$. However, we will_see that this is not the_case, i.e., the final step $\mathfrak{e}_{\mathcal{C}}(G,H,K)$_is invariant of strong inductive chain from_$H$ to $G$ (see Remark \[r1\])._Observe that if $(H,K)$ is_a strong_Shoda pair of $G$, then_$\mathfrak{e}_{\mathcal{C}}(G,H,K)= {e}_{\mathcal{C}}(G,H,K)$ on_taking strong_inductive chain: $H_\leq G$.

[\[t1\]]{} Let $\mathbb{F}_{q}$ be a_finite field of_order $q$ and $