 to 40%. This is found to be due to incorrectly determined scalelengths and isophotal radii, which are used to define the aperture sizes for Kron and total fluxes. While 2MASS metric aperture luminosities are correct (and, thus, colors based on those apertures), comparison to other filters (e.g. optical) based on total magnitudes will produce erroneous results. We use our own galaxy photometry package (ARCHANGEL) to determine correct total magnitudes and colors using the same 2MASS images, but with a more refined surface brightness reduction scheme. Our resulting colors, and color-magnitude relation, are more in line with model expectations and previous pointed observations.'
author:
- James Schombert
title: Systematic Bias in 2MASS Galaxy Photometry
---

Introduction
============

Surface photometry is an important tool in the understanding of galaxy mass and structure. Galaxy luminosity measures the primary baryonic component, (i.e. stellar mass) and structural information traces the gravitational potential. Galaxy formation scenarios make specific predictions on the light distribution of galaxies, so accurate reduction of a galaxy image into a total magnitude and scalelength are important parameters to understanding the fundamental plane and the star formation history of galaxies.

Obtaining the structural characteristics and the total luminosity of a galaxy requires knowledge of its surface brightness profile to a significant depth. In order to extrapolate a total luminosity, isophotal analysis is required to determine how far one needs to integrate a galaxy’s light plus to provide sufficient information to extrapolate the light profile.

During a surface photometry project to explore the structure of galaxies by morphological type (Schombert & Smith 2011), we discovered a significant discrepancy between the structural and luminosity parameters that we determined using raw 2MASS images versus those reported by the 2MASS project in their Extended Source Catalog (Jarrett 2000). We use this letter to outline the problem, and the solution, for other researchers.

Sample
======

Our original project was to perform surface photometry of large galaxies over a full range of morphological types. This type of analysis was previously attempted by 2MASS (Jarrett 2003), but their focus was not on the structural characteristics of galaxies, but rather luminosities and colors. The first stage of our project was to understand the surface photometry of ellipticals, the simplest galaxies for structural studies as they have highly symmetric isophotes and very few complications to their light distributions due to extinction or recent star formation.

to 40% . This is found to be due to incorrectly determined scalelengths and isophotal radius, which are use to define the aperture sizes for Kron and total flux. While 2MASS metric aperture luminosities are right (and, thus, colors based on those aperture), comparison to other filters (for example optical) based on total magnitudes will grow erroneous results. We use our own galaxy photometry package (ARCHANGEL) to determine right total magnitudes and colors use the same 2MASS images, but with a more polished surface luminosity reduction outline. Our resulting colors, and color - order of magnitude relation, are more in line with model expectations and previous pointed observations.' 
 writer: 
 - James Schombert 
 title: Systematic Bias in 2MASS Galaxy Photometry 
 --- 

 Introduction 
 = = = = = = = = = = = = 

 Surface photometry is an important tool in the understanding of galaxy mass and structure. Galaxy luminosity measures the primary baryonic part, (i.e. leading mass) and structural information trace the gravitational potential. Galaxy formation scenarios do specific predictions on the light distribution of galaxies, so accurate decrease of a galaxy image into a total magnitude and scalelength are important parameters to understanding the fundamental plane and the star formation history of galaxies. 

 prevail the structural feature and the total luminosity of a galaxy requires knowledge of its surface luminosity profile to a significant depth. In order to extrapolate a total luminosity, isophotal analysis is required to determine how far one want to integrate a galaxy ’s luminosity plus to provide sufficient data to extrapolate the light profile. 

 During a surface photometry undertaking to explore the structure of galaxies by morphologic character (Schombert & Smith 2011), we discovered a significant discrepancy between the structural and luminosity parameter that we determined using raw 2MASS images versus those reported by the 2MASS undertaking in their Extended Source Catalog (Jarrett 2000). We use this letter to outline the trouble, and the solution, for other researchers. 

 Sample 
 = = = = = = 

 Our original project was to do surface photometry of large galaxies over a full range of morphological types. This type of analysis was previously attempted by 2MASS (Jarrett 2003), but their focus was not on the geomorphologic characteristic of galaxy, but rather luminosities and colors. The first stage of our project was to sympathize the surface photometry of ellipticals, the simplest galaxies for structural studies as they have highly symmetric isophotes and very few complications to their light distributions due to extinction or late star formation.
 to 40%. This is found to be dut to incorrectly bwtermiied scamelengthr and isophotal radii, which ere ysed uj define the apertjre sizes for Krob anv total fluxes. Wijle 2MASS metrjg apextnre luminositiex are corract (and, thus, cmlurd based on those apertures), comparisjn to oyhfr filters (e.g. jptibaj) baavd on total magnitudes will prosuce ergoneous results. Wr use our own galaxy photoletrj package (ARCHANGEP) to determune sirrect total magnitudes and colors using the same 2MASS images, but with a more redibed vurface brijhtnesf reduction scheme. Ogr resukting colors, akd conor-nagnitude relation, arx more in line with iodel expaccations and previous pounted obsarvaguonr.'
auuhoc:
- Jzmes Sfhojbert
title: Systematic Bias in 2MASS Galaxu [yotometry
---

Intrkductijn
============

Furface photometry is an important tool in the understanding of gqlaxy mass and structore. Galaxy luminosity measures the primary baryonic componett, (i.e. rteolwf mwss) and structural information traces the gradjtstponal potential. Gclaxy formation xcfnstios make speckfic pxsdjctions on the ligjt disttibutiin of galwxiex, so accurate reduction of q galaxy imaye unto a total magnicude and scauelemgth sre important parameterr to understandlng the fhvdamental plane xnd tve star formation history jf galaxixs.

Obtcining tfe sjructurwl charactfristlws and the total lkminodidy of a gapaxy requires knowledge of its surface brightmevs irofile tj a slgnificant deptr. In order to gxtrapolace a tutal luminksity, ivophotal anwlysis is reqglred to detecmine how far one needs gu integrate a balaxy’s lpgkt plus ti provide sufficiekt inwkrmation to extxcpilate the light prufije.

Fucing w surface phodomegry lrojezt to explove ghe xtructure of galaxiev by morphological typr (Fchomberj & Smith 2011), we discoverec a significant didcrepency bxtween thg structural and luminosity parzmeters tjat we determinqd uwing raw 2MASX images versus those reported by the 2MESS project in their Exrended Source Catalpn (Jarrett 2000). Wx use ehis lettar to outline the priblem, and the solmtion, for other researdhers.

Sdmple
======

Lur original project was to perform surface photometry of large galaxies iver a full range kf mprphonoyiccl typef. Thms type of analysix was previously attempted by 2MESS (Jarretd 2003), but their focus was not on yhd structural zharacteristics of galaxjes, but tather luminosities and colors. Yhe first stage of our pvoject waw to hndersnznv the surface photomrtry oy ellipticals, the simplest galxxirs for strufturel atudies as they have highly symmwtric uslphotes and very few compligauions tk theit light distributjons fue tu extinction pr recent star formation.

to 40%. This is found to be incorrectly scalelengths and radii, which are sizes Kron and total While 2MASS metric luminosities are correct (and, thus, colors on those apertures), comparison to other filters (e.g. optical) based on total magnitudes produce erroneous results. We use our own galaxy photometry package (ARCHANGEL) to determine total and using same 2MASS images, but with a more refined surface brightness reduction scheme. Our resulting colors, and relation, are more in line with model expectations previous pointed observations.' author: James Schombert title: Systematic Bias 2MASS Photometry --- ============ photometry an important tool the understanding of galaxy mass and structure. Galaxy luminosity measures the primary baryonic component, (i.e. stellar mass) structural information gravitational potential. formation make predictions on the of galaxies, so accurate reduction of into a total magnitude and scalelength are important to understanding fundamental plane and the star formation of galaxies. Obtaining the structural characteristics and the luminosity of a galaxy requires knowledge of its surface brightness profile to a significant depth. to extrapolate a total isophotal analysis is to how one to integrate galaxy’s light plus to provide sufficient information to extrapolate the light During a surface photometry project to explore the structure of morphological (Schombert & Smith we discovered a significant between structural and luminosity parameters determined raw those by 2MASS project in their Source Catalog (Jarrett 2000). We this letter to outline for other researchers. Sample ====== Our original project to perform surface photometry of large galaxies a full range of morphological types. This type of analysis was previously by 2MASS but their focus was not on the structural of galaxies, but rather and colors. The first stage of our project was understand surface photometry ellipticals, the simplest for structural studies they have highly and very complications their to extinction or recent star formation.
 to 40%. This is found to be due to incOrrectly deTermiNed ScaLeLengThs aNd isophotal radII, whiCh are used to define the apErturE sIZes fOR KRon anD total fLUxES. whiLe 2mAsS mEtRIc ApertUre LuminosIties are coRreCt (And, thus, colorS BaSed on those ApeRtures), comparIsoN to othEr FilTErs (e.g. OptIcal) bAsed on TOtal maGnitudes wIlL ProducE ErroneoUS ReSultS. We use our own galaxY PhOTometry package (aRCHANgEl) To DETerMinE correct toTaL magnITudes anD CoLORS usINg the same 2MASS Images, but wiTH a mOre refInEd sURface bRightNeSS reDuction scheMe. OuR resultinG colorS, And coloR-MagnituDe relaTioN, arE morE In LiNe wItH ModEL eXpeCTatIons and pReViOus poInteD OBSErvaTioNs.'
auThor:
- JAmes Schombert
TitLe: SySTemAtic BIas in 2mASS gaLaxy PHotomeTry
---

InTrOduction
============

Surface PhotOmetry is aN imPoRtaNt Tool iN The undErsTanDing of gAlaxy maSS anD sTRUCtUre. Galaxy luminositY mEASuRes the prImary bARyOnIC componeNt, (I.e. sTellAR Mass) aNd stRUcTural infOrmatiON tRaCes the gRaVitatiOnAl pOteNtial. gAlaxY formaTion scenArios MAke specific preDIctions on the lIGhT DIsTRibuTioN of galaxies, So acCUratE redUCtIon OF a galAxy imAgE InTO a total magnitude and ScAlelenGth arE important parAmeters to uNDERstandinG the FUnDAmental plane anD the sTar formatiON history Of galAxies.

ObtAining the STRuctural ChaRacTerIstICS aNd the total lumINOsitY oF a galaxY reQuires kNowLedGe oF itS sUrface briGhtness pRoFiLe To A siGnifiCAnt depth. in OrdEr To eXtrapOLate a tOtal lUminOsItY, IsoPhotal aNAlYSIs is ReQuIred To dEtErminE how FAr oNe needs To integraTe a GAlaxY’s LiGht plus To provide suffIcIent informAtIon To extrAPOlate the Light profile.

During a surfACe photoMetRy proJect To explore The StructUre OF galaxIes by mOrphoLoGicAL Type (SCHOmBerT & SMith 2011), we discOVEreD a sigNiFicaNt discrEpancy between the stRUctUral and luminoSitY parAMEtErs THaT We dEtERmiNED using raw 2MASS imAges versus ThOSe Reported by THe 2MaSs projecT in theiR ExteNDed SourCe Catalog (jarrett 2000). We UsE thiS LEttEr to outlinE the probLem, and the SOlutiON, fOr othEr rEsearcHeRs.

SAmple
======

our oriGInaL projEct was To PerforM surfAcE photomeTry of large galaxies over a Full raNge of MorPhologicaL tyPEs. THis type of AnalYsis was preVioUslY atteMptED by 2MAsS (JaRReTt 2003), bUT theiR focUS was not on THe StrUCTuRal characteRISTicS of gaLaxIEs, but rAtheR luminosities and cOLors. The first stAge oF OUr pRojECt waS tO understand the SurFaCE PhotometRy Of ellipticaLs, the simPlESt galAxies fOr struCtural sTUDiES as theY havE hiGhly symmeTriC iSOphotes AnD vERy few cOmplIcAtions To theiR LighT DIstributions due tO extiNCTion oR RecEnt stAr FormatiON.

 to 40%. This is found tobe due toincor rec tly  d eter mine d scalelengths andisophotal radii, which  areus e d to de finethe ape r tu r e  si ze sfor  K r on  andtot al flux es. While2MA SS  metric aper t ur e luminosi tie s are correc t ( and, t hu s,c olors  ba sed o n thos e  apert ures), co mp a risont o other f il ters  (e.g. optical) b a se d  on total magn itudes  w i ll p rod uce  erroneous  r esult s . We us e  o u r own galaxy photom etry packag e  (A RCHANG EL ) t o  deter mineco r rec t total mag nitu des and c olorsu sing th e  same 2 MASS i mag es,  but wi th  amo r e r e fi ned sur face bri gh tn ess r educ t i o n  sch eme . Ou r res ulting colors , a nd c o lor -magn itude  rel at ion,are mo re in  l ine with modelexpe ctationsand  p rev io us po i nted o bse rva tions.' 
author : 
-Ja m e s  S chombert
title: Sy st e m at ic Biasin 2MA S SGa l axy Phot om etr y
-- - 
Intr oduc t io n
====== ====== 
S ur face ph ot ometry  i s a n i mport a nt t ool in  the und ersta n ding of galaxy mass and stru c tu r e .G alax y l uminosity m easu r es t he p r im ary baryo nic c om p on e nt, (i.e. stellar m as s) and  stru ctural inform ation trac e s the grav itat i on a l potential. G alaxy  formation scenario s mak e specif ic predic t i ons on t helig htdis t r ib ution of gala x i es,so  accura tereducti onofa g ala xy  image in to a tot al  m ag ni tud e and scalelen gt h a re  im porta n t para meter s to  u nd e rst andingt he f unda me nt al p lan eand t he s t arformati on histor y o f  gal ax ie s.

Obt aining the st ru ctural cha ra cte ristic s and thetotal luminosity of a g a laxy re qui res k nowl edge of i tssurfac e b r ightne ss pro fileto  as i gnifi c a nt  de pt h. In orde r toextra po late  a tota l luminosity, isop h ota l analysis is  re quir e d  t o d e te r min eh owf a r one needs tointegrateag al axy’s ligh t  pl us  to pro vide su ffici e nt info rmation t o extrapo la te t h e  li ght profil e.

Duri ng a surf a ce ph o to metry  pr ojectto  ex plore  the s t ruc tureof gal ax ies by  morp ho logicaltype (Schombert & Smith  2011) , wedis covered a  si g nif icant dis crep ancy betwe enthe  stru ctu r al an d lu m in osi t y par amet e rs that w e  d ete r m in ed using ra w 2 MAS S ima ges versus  tho se reported by th e  2MASS project  int h eir  Ex t ende dSource Catalog  (J ar r e tt 2000) .We use this  letterto outli ne the  probl em, and t he soluti on,for  other re sea rc h ers.

S am pl e 
===== =

O ur  origi nal pr o ject w as to perform su rface p hotom e try  of l ar ge gala x iesover a ful l range ofmorpho logi cal t ypes. T hi s type  of  a nalysis wa s  previous ly at tempted  b y 2M ASS  (Jarr ett2 0 03),butth eir  focus wa s no t  o nt hestru ctura lchar acteristi c s of gal axi e s, butra the r lumino s it i e s and colo rs.  Thef i rst stageo f ou r  p r oject  was t o unde rstandt hesu rface p hot o m etry of e lliptical s , t he  sim plest ga la xies  f orst ructural studie s as the y have h i g hly sy mme t rici sophot es  and very fe w com pl i cations t o t heir li g htdis tri buti ons  due to extinction or recentstar  form a tio n.

 to_40%. This_is found to be_due to_incorrectly_determined scalelengths_and_isophotal radii, which_are used to_define the aperture sizes_for Kron and_total_fluxes. While 2MASS metric aperture luminosities are correct (and, thus, colors based on those_apertures),_comparison to_other_filters_(e.g. optical) based on total_magnitudes will produce erroneous results._We use_our own galaxy photometry package (ARCHANGEL) to determine_correct_total magnitudes and_colors using the same 2MASS images, but with a_more refined surface brightness reduction scheme._Our resulting colors,_and_color-magnitude_relation, are more in_line with model expectations and previous_pointed observations.'
author:
- James Schombert
title: Systematic Bias_in 2MASS Galaxy Photometry
---

Introduction
============

Surface photometry is an_important tool in the understanding of_galaxy mass and structure. Galaxy_luminosity measures_the primary baryonic component, (i.e._stellar mass) and_structural information_traces the gravitational_potential. Galaxy formation scenarios make specific_predictions on the_light distribution of galaxies, so accurate_reduction_of a galaxy_image_into_a total_magnitude and scalelength_are_important parameters_to_understanding the fundamental plane and the_star_formation history of galaxies.

Obtaining the structural characteristics_and the total luminosity_of_a galaxy requires knowledge_of its surface brightness profile_to a significant depth. In order_to extrapolate_a total_luminosity, isophotal analysis is required to determine how far one needs_to integrate a galaxy’s light plus_to provide sufficient information_to extrapolate_the_light profile.

During a_surface_photometry project_to explore the structure of galaxies by_morphological type_(Schombert & Smith 2011), we discovered_a significant discrepancy between_the_structural and luminosity parameters that we_determined using raw 2MASS images versus_those reported by the 2MASS_project_in_their Extended Source Catalog (Jarrett_2000). We use this letter to_outline the problem,_and the solution, for other researchers.

Sample
======

Our original_project_was to perform surface photometry of_large_galaxies over a full range of_morphological_types._This type of analysis was_previously attempted by 2MASS (Jarrett 2003),_but their focus was not on the structural characteristics_of galaxies, but_rather luminosities and colors. The_first_stage_of our project was to understand the surface photometry of_ellipticals, the_simplest galaxies for_structural studies as they have highly symmetric isophotes and very_few complications to their light distributions due_to extinction or recent star formation.
