 Hilbert space since $\mathcal{N}^\perp$ is closed in $\mathcal{H}^{2k}$. The restriction $S(\tau)|_{\mathcal{N}^\perp}$ defines a semigroup on $\mathcal{N}^\perp$ and its generator is the part of $L$ in $\mathcal{N}^\perp$, denoted by $L_{\mathcal{N}^\perp}$. The generator satisfies $$\begin{gathered}
\mathrm{Re}(L_{\mathcal{N}^\perp}\mathbf{u}|\mathbf{u})_{\mathcal{N}^\perp}=\\
\mathrm{Re}\left ((L_0
D^{2k}\mathbf{u}|D^{2k}\mathbf{u})_\mathcal{H}+
(L'D^{2k}\mathbf{u}|D^{2k}\mathbf{u})_\mathcal{H} \right )-2k(D^{2k}
\mathbf{u}|D^{2k}\mathbf{u})_\mathcal{H} \\
\leq \left
(\frac{1}{2}+pc_0-2k \right )\|\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathcal{N}^\perp}^2\end{gathered}$$ for all $\mathbf{u} \in \mathcal{D}(L_{\mathcal{N}^\perp})$ where we have used the commutator relation from Lemma \[lem\_elem\] and the fact that $L'$ and $D^{2k}$ commute, as already remarked. This, however, implies the growth estimate $\|S(\tau)\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathcal{N}^\perp}\leq
e^{(\frac{1}{2}+pc_0-2k)\tau}\|\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathcal{N}^\perp}$ for all $\mathbf{u}
\in \mathcal{N}^\perp$ and $\tau>0$ and by the equivalence of the norms $\|\cdot\|_{\mathcal{H}^{2k}}$ and $\|\cdot\|_{\mathcal{N}^\perp}$ (Proposition \[prop\_s0res\]) we arrive at the claim.

Note that the growth estimate given in Proposition \[prop\_SonNperp\] is certainly not optimal, however, we do not make any attempts to improve it since we can make $k$ arbitrarily large.

Analytic modes
--------------

The point spectrum of $L$ can be calculated by solving a second order ODE. To this end we recall the definition of the operator $T(\lambda)$ from
Hilbert space since $ \mathcal{N}^\perp$ is closed in $ \mathcal{H}^{2k}$. The restriction $ S(\tau)|_{\mathcal{N}^\perp}$ defines a semigroup on $ \mathcal{N}^\perp$ and its generator is the character of $ L$ in $ \mathcal{N}^\perp$, announce by $ L_{\mathcal{N}^\perp}$. The generator satisfies $ $ \begin{gathered } 
 \mathrm{Re}(L_{\mathcal{N}^\perp}\mathbf{u}|\mathbf{u})_{\mathcal{N}^\perp}=\\ 
 \mathrm{Re}\left (( L_0 
 D^{2k}\mathbf{u}|D^{2k}\mathbf{u})_\mathcal{H}+ 
 (L'D^{2k}\mathbf{u}|D^{2k}\mathbf{u})_\mathcal{H } \right) -2k(D^{2k } 
 \mathbf{u}|D^{2k}\mathbf{u})_\mathcal{H } \\ 
 \leq \left 
 (\frac{1}{2}+pc_0 - 2k \right) \|\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathcal{N}^\perp}^2\end{gathered}$$ for all $ \mathbf{u } \in \mathcal{D}(L_{\mathcal{N}^\perp})$ where we have used the commutator relation from Lemma \[lem\_elem\ ] and the fact that $ L'$ and $ D^{2k}$ commute, as already comment. This, however, implies the growth appraisal $ \|S(\tau)\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathcal{N}^\perp}\leq 
 e^{(\frac{1}{2}+pc_0 - 2k)\tau}\|\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathcal{N}^\perp}$ for all $ \mathbf{u } 
 \in \mathcal{N}^\perp$ and $ \tau>0 $ and by the equivalence of the norms $ \|\cdot\|_{\mathcal{H}^{2k}}$ and $ \|\cdot\|_{\mathcal{N}^\perp}$ (Proposition \[prop\_s0res\ ]) we arrive at the claim. 

 notice that the increase estimate give in Proposition \[prop\_SonNperp\ ] is certainly not optimal, however, we do not seduce any attempts to improve it since we can make $ k$ arbitrarily large. 

 Analytic modes 
 -------------- 

 The detail spectrum of $ L$ can be calculated by solving a second order ODE. To this conclusion we recall the definition of the operator $ T(\lambda)$ from
 Hipbert space since $\mathcau{N}^\perp$ is closeb in $\mavhcal{H}^{2k}$. The resgriction $S(\tau)|_{\mathcal{N}^\perp}$ dehinew a stiigroup on $\mathcal{V}^\perp$ and its genwratie is the pedt of $L$ in $\mafmcal{N}^\'ecp$, denoted by $L_{\kathcal{N}^\pesp}$. The generatmr sctisfies $$\begin{gathered}
\mathrm{Re}(L_{\mathcwl{N}^\perp}\kahhbf{u}|\mathbf{u})_{\majhcal{M}^\[erp}=\\
\jathrm{Re}\left ((L_0
D^{2k}\mathbf{u}|D^{2k}\mathbf{u})_\mafhcal{H}+
(L'V^{2k}\mathbf{u}|D^{2k}\mathnf{u})_\mathcal{H} \right )-2k(D^{2k}
\mathbv{u}|D^{2k}\lathbf{u})_\mathcal{H} \\
\lee \left
(\frac{1}{2}+px_0-2k \rytht )\|\mathbf{u}\|_{\mxthcal{N}^\perk}^2\eud{gathered}$$ ror all $\mathbf{u} \in \mathcal{D}(L_{\matfcal{N}^\'erp})$ where qe hagg used the cimmutwtor relatiok from Nemma \[lrm\_elem\] and the fart tyat $L'$ and $D^{2k}$ commute, es already remarked. Jhis, howevar, implies the growrh estikate $\|S(\taj)\natfbf{h}\|_{\methdal{N}^\pegp}\lxq
e^{(\frac{1}{2}+pc_0-2k)\tzu}\|\mathbf{u}\|_{\marhcal{N}^\perp}$ for all $\kaeybf{u}
\in \mathcam{N}^\perp$ agd $\tau>0$ and by the equivalence of the nogms $\|\ddot\|_{\mathcal{H}^{2k}}$ and $\|\cdot\|_{\mqthcal{N}^\perp}$ (Propositiln \[prop\_s0rqs\]) we arrive at the claim.

Note that the growth esthmate eivtn in Pfiplsition \[prop\_SonNperp\] is certainly not optimal, goeener, we do not makc any attempts to omorpde it since wg can mcie $k$ arbitrarily larhe.

Analyjic moees
--------------

The poynt xpectrum of $L$ can be calculqted by solvpng q second order ODE. To this enb we rgcall yhe definition of the o'eratod $T(\lambda)$ fgom
Hilbert space since $\mathcal{N}^\perp$ is closed in restriction defines a on $\mathcal{N}^\perp$ and of in $\mathcal{N}^\perp$, denoted $L_{\mathcal{N}^\perp}$. The generator $$\begin{gathered} \mathrm{Re}(L_{\mathcal{N}^\perp}\mathbf{u}|\mathbf{u})_{\mathcal{N}^\perp}=\\ \mathrm{Re}\left ((L_0 D^{2k}\mathbf{u}|D^{2k}\mathbf{u})_\mathcal{H}+ (L'D^{2k}\mathbf{u}|D^{2k}\mathbf{u})_\mathcal{H} )-2k(D^{2k} \mathbf{u}|D^{2k}\mathbf{u})_\mathcal{H} \\ \leq \left (\frac{1}{2}+pc_0-2k \right )\|\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathcal{N}^\perp}^2\end{gathered}$$ for all $\mathbf{u} \in \mathcal{D}(L_{\mathcal{N}^\perp})$ we have used the commutator relation from Lemma \[lem\_elem\] and the fact that and commute, already This, however, implies the growth estimate $\|S(\tau)\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathcal{N}^\perp}\leq e^{(\frac{1}{2}+pc_0-2k)\tau}\|\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathcal{N}^\perp}$ for all $\mathbf{u} \in \mathcal{N}^\perp$ and $\tau>0$ and the equivalence of the norms $\|\cdot\|_{\mathcal{H}^{2k}}$ and $\|\cdot\|_{\mathcal{N}^\perp}$ \[prop\_s0res\]) we arrive at claim. Note that the growth given Proposition \[prop\_SonNperp\] certainly optimal, we do not any attempts to improve it since we can make $k$ arbitrarily large. Analytic modes -------------- The point of $L$ calculated by a order To this end the definition of the operator $T(\lambda)$
 Hilbert space since $\mathcal{N}^\Perp$ is closEd in $\mAthCal{h}^{2k}$. the rEstrIction $S(\tau)|_{\mathCAl{N}^\pErp}$ defines a semigroup on $\MathcAl{n}^\Perp$ ANd Its geNerator IS tHE ParT oF $L$ In $\mAtHCaL{N}^\perP$, deNoted by $l_{\mathcal{N}^\pErp}$. thE generator saTIsFies $$\begin{gAthEred}
\mathrm{Re}(l_{\maThcal{N}^\PeRp}\mAThbf{u}|\MatHbf{u})_{\mAthcal{n}^\Perp}=\\
\maThrm{Re}\lefT ((L_0
d^{2K}\mathbF{U}|D^{2k}\mathBF{U})_\mAthcAl{H}+
(L'D^{2k}\mathbf{u}|D^{2k}\maTHbF{U})_\mathcal{H} \right )-2K(D^{2k}
\matHbF{U}|D^{2K}\MAthBf{u})_\Mathcal{H} \\
\leQ \lEft
(\frAC{1}{2}+pc_0-2k \rigHT )\|\mATHBf{u}\|_{\MAthcal{N}^\perp}^2\enD{gathered}$$ foR All $\Mathbf{U} \iN \maTHcal{D}(L_{\MathcAl{n}^\PerP})$ where we havE useD the commuTator rELation fROm Lemma \[Lem\_eleM\] anD thE facT ThAt $l'$ anD $D^{2K}$ ComMUtE, as ALreAdy remarKeD. THis, hoWeveR, IMPLies The GrowTh estImate $\|S(\tau)\mathBf{u}\|_{\MathCAl{N}^\Perp}\lEq
e^{(\frAc{1}{2}+pc_0-2K)\tAu}\|\matHbf{u}\|_{\maThcal{n}^\pErp}$ for all $\mathbf{U}
\in \mAthcal{N}^\peRp$ aNd $\Tau>0$ AnD by thE EquivaLenCe oF the norMs $\|\cdot\|_{\mAThcAl{h}^{2K}}$ ANd $\|\Cdot\|_{\mathcal{N}^\perp}$ (PrOpOSItIon \[prop\_s0Res\]) we aRRiVe AT the claiM.

NOte That THE growTh esTImAte given In PropOSiTiOn \[prop\_SOnnperp\] iS cErtAinLy not OPtimAl, howeVer, we do nOt makE Any attempts to iMProve it since wE CaN MAkE $K$ arbItrArily large.

ANalyTIc moDes
--------------

THE pOinT SpectRum of $l$ cAN bE Calculated by solving A sEcond oRder OdE. To this end we Recall the dEFINition of The oPErATor $T(\lambda)$ from
 Hilbert space since $\mat hcal{N}^\p erp$isclo se d in  $\m athcal{H}^{2k} $ . Th e restriction $S(\tau) |_{\m at h cal{ N }^ \perp }$ defi n es a  se mi gr oup  o n  $ \math cal {N}^\pe rp$ and it s g en erator is th e  p art of $L$  in  $\mathcal{N }^\ perp$,  d eno t ed by  $L _{\ma thcal{ N }^\per p}$. Thege n erator satisfi e s  $ $\be gin{gathered}
\ma t hr m {Re}(L_{\mathc al{N}^ \p e rp } \ mat hbf {u}|\mathb f{ u})_{ \ mathcal { N} ^ \ p erp } =\\
\mathrm{R e}\left ((L _ 0
D ^{2k}\ ma thb f {u}|D^ {2k}\ ma t hbf {u})_\mathc al{H }+
(L'D^{ 2k}\ma t hbf{u}| D ^{2k}\m athbf{ u}) _\m athc a l{ H}  \r ig h t ) - 2k (D^ { 2k} 
\mathbf {u }| D^{2k }\ma t h b f {u}) _\m athc al{H}  \\
\leq \lef t
( \fra c {1} {2}+p c_0-2 k \r ig ht )\ |\math bf{u} \| _{\mathcal{N}^\ perp }^2\end{g ath er ed} $$  fora ll $\m ath bf{ u} \in\mathca l {D} (L _ { \ ma thcal{N}^\perp})$wh e r ewe haveused t h eco m mutatorre lat ionf r om Le mma\ [l em\_elem \] and th efact th at  $L'$an d $ D^{ 2k}$c ommu te, as  already  rema r ked. This, how e ver, impliest he g ro w th e sti mate $\|S(\ tau) \ math bf{u } \| _{\ m athca l{N}^ \p e rp } \leq
e^{(\frac{1}{2 }+ pc_0-2 k)\ta u}\|\mathbf{u }\|_{\math c a l {N}^\per p}$f or all $\mathbf{u }
\in  \mathcal{ N }^\perp$  and$\tau>0$  and by t h e  equival enc e o f t hen o rm s $\|\cdot\|_ { \ math ca l{H}^{2 k}} $ and $ \|\ cdo t\| _{\ ma thcal{N}^ \perp}$(P ro po si tio n \[p r op\_s0re s\ ])we  ar rivea t theclaim .

N ot et hat  the gr o wt h esti ma te  giv enin  Prop osit i on\[prop\ _SonNperp \]i s ce rt ai nly not  optimal, how ev er, we dono t m ake an y attempts  to improve it since we can mak e $ k$ ar bitr arily lar ge. 

Anal yti c  modes 
----- ----- -- --T he po i n tspe ct rum of $L$ c anbe ca lc ulat ed by s olving a second or d erODE. To thisend  wer e ca llt he def in i tio n of the operator  $T(\lambd a) $  f rom
 Hilbert_space since_$\mathcal{N}^\perp$ is closed in_$\mathcal{H}^{2k}$. The_restriction_$S(\tau)|_{\mathcal{N}^\perp}$ defines_a_semigroup on $\mathcal{N}^\perp$_and its generator_is the part of_$L$ in $\mathcal{N}^\perp$,_denoted_by $L_{\mathcal{N}^\perp}$. The generator satisfies $$\begin{gathered}
\mathrm{Re}(L_{\mathcal{N}^\perp}\mathbf{u}|\mathbf{u})_{\mathcal{N}^\perp}=\\
\mathrm{Re}\left ((L_0
D^{2k}\mathbf{u}|D^{2k}\mathbf{u})_\mathcal{H}+
(L'D^{2k}\mathbf{u}|D^{2k}\mathbf{u})_\mathcal{H} \right )-2k(D^{2k}
\mathbf{u}|D^{2k}\mathbf{u})_\mathcal{H} \\
\leq \left
(\frac{1}{2}+pc_0-2k \right )\|\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathcal{N}^\perp}^2\end{gathered}$$ for_all_$\mathbf{u} \in_\mathcal{D}(L_{\mathcal{N}^\perp})$_where_we have used the commutator_relation from Lemma \[lem\_elem\] and_the fact_that $L'$ and $D^{2k}$ commute, as already remarked._This,_however, implies the_growth estimate $\|S(\tau)\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathcal{N}^\perp}\leq
e^{(\frac{1}{2}+pc_0-2k)\tau}\|\mathbf{u}\|_{\mathcal{N}^\perp}$ for all $\mathbf{u}
\in \mathcal{N}^\perp$ and $\tau>0$_and by the equivalence of the_norms $\|\cdot\|_{\mathcal{H}^{2k}}$ and_$\|\cdot\|_{\mathcal{N}^\perp}$_(Proposition_\[prop\_s0res\]) we arrive at_the claim.

Note that the growth estimate_given in Proposition \[prop\_SonNperp\] is certainly_not optimal, however, we do not make_any attempts to improve it since_we can make $k$ arbitrarily_large.

Analytic modes
--------------

The_point spectrum of $L$ can_be calculated by_solving a_second order ODE._To this end we recall the_definition of the_operator $T(\lambda)$ from