. Such a behavior is generally observed in superspin-glass or cluster-glass where the microscopic flipping time of the fluctuating magnetic entities (superspins) is much longer than that of atomic spin-glass, and therefore, the observation time in units of microscopic flipping time is relatively shorter in comparison of atomic spin-glass.[@Markovich; @Markovich1; @Jonsson; @Sankar] Because of this, the length scales probed during the experimental time scale are shorter and the condition for rejuvenation, i.e. the length scales probed during the experimental time scale are larger than the so called overlap length, is not satisfied.[@Jonsson] The absence of complete rejuvenation in ZFC memory may also occur if the probing field is strong enough to perturb the intrinsic non-equilibrium dynamics of the spin-glass system.

Temperature-field cycling and relaxation
----------------------------------------

The relaxation experiments discussed in previous section are complemented with an intermediate negative thermal cycling with and without field change. Figure. \[fig:AgingRej\] (a) shows the result of temperature cycling without field change under ZFC protocol. Here the sample is cooled to 50 K in zero field, then 100 Oe field is applied and the magnetization is recorded as a function of time for $t_1$ s. Then keeping the field constant, the temperature is changed to 40 K and magnetization is recorded for $t_2$ s. Thereafter temperature is again brought to 50 K (without changing the field) and magnetization is taken for $t_3$ s. According to Sun et al., for superspin or cluster -glass, the relaxation during $t_3$ should be the continuation of the relaxation at $t_1$.[@Sun; @Bandyopadhyay; @Vijay] The inset of Fig. \[fig:AgingRej\] (a) shows the relaxation at $t_1$ and $t_3$. The relaxation during $t_3$ has the same functional form as during $t_1$ but is shifted upward. Figure. \[fig:AgingRej\] (b) exhibits the relaxation under similar protocol but with a zero field between $t_1$ and $t_3$. As clear from the inset of Fig. \[fig:AgingRej\] (b), the relaxation at $t_3$ is the continuation
. Such a behavior is generally observed in superspin - glass or bunch - looking glass where the microscopic flipping time of the fluctuate charismatic entities (superspins) is much longer than that of nuclear tailspin - glass, and therefore, the observation time in units of microscopic flipping prison term is relatively shorter in comparison of atomic tailspin - glass.[@Markovich; @Markovich1; @Jonsson; @Sankar ] Because of this, the length scales probed during the experimental time scale are shorter and the condition for rejuvenation, i.e. the duration scales probed during the experimental time plate are larger than the so call lap length, is not satisfied.[@Jonsson ] The absence of complete rejuvenation in ZFC memory may also occur if the probing field is potent enough to perturb the intrinsic non - equilibrium dynamics of the spin - glass system. 

 Temperature - field cycling and liberalization 
 ---------------------------------------- 

 The relaxation experiments discussed in previous section are complemented with an intermediate negative thermal cycling with and without field change. human body.   \[fig: AgingRej\ ]   (a) shows the resultant role of temperature cycling without field change under ZFC protocol. Here the sample is cooled to 50   potassium in zero battlefield, then 100   Oe field is applied and the magnetization is commemorate as a function of time for $ t_1 $   s. Then keeping the field ceaseless, the temperature is changed to 40   K and magnetization is recorded for $ t_2 $   s. Thereafter temperature is again brought to 50   K (without change the plain) and magnetization is taken for $ t_3 $   s. According to Sun et al. , for superspin or cluster -glass, the relaxation during $ t_3 $ should be the continuation of the liberalization at $ t_1$.[@Sun; @Bandyopadhyay; @Vijay ] The inset of Fig.   \[fig: AgingRej\ ] (a) shows the relaxation at $ t_1 $ and $ t_3$. The liberalization during $ t_3 $ has the same functional form as during $ t_1 $ but is shift upward. design.   \[fig: AgingRej\ ]   (b) exhibits the easiness under similar protocol but with a zero battlefield between $ t_1 $ and $ t_3$. As clean from the inset of Fig.   \[fig: AgingRej\ ]   (b), the liberalization at $ t_3 $ is the continuation
. Sufh a behavior is generaluy observed in superspmn-glass or clusger-glass where the microscopmc foippibg time of the fluctuaging magnvtic entiries (wuperspins) is much longed thau vhat of atomic xpin-glass, dnd therefore, dhd lbservation time in units of microssopic fkioping time is telatpvqly ahorter in comparison of atomic spjn-glass.[@Karkovich; @Marlovich1; @Jonsson; @Sankar] Becakse lf this, the length scales proved qyring the exoerimental time scale zre shorter and the condition fur reluvenation, u.e. thf length scaoes pgobed during bne exparimentsl time scale sre laeger than the so callxd overlap length, is not sativfned.[@Jonsson] The absencw if cokplede rdhuvdnauioi ih ZFC lemkry may alao occur if the probing field os wtrong enough to pewttrb the intrinsic non-equilibrium dynamibs or the spin-glass system.

Twmperature-field cyclijg and rejaxation
----------------------------------------

The relaxation experiments discussed in psevions seeblon xee complemented with an intermediate negative trsrkak cycling with and withouy virjd change. Figore. \[fig:AyjnfRej\] (a) shows the redult of tempwrature crclimg without field change undwr ZFC protobol. Yere the sample is cooled to 50 Y in zero field, then 100 Oe field is appmied and thf magnetiaxtion is recordea ax d function of time for $t_1$ s. Ehen keepmng tke field conxtant, ehe temperwture is changed to 40 K anf maguetizdtion is rfcorded for $t_2$ s. Thereafter tempeceture is agaim trolght to 50 K (withput changing ehe field) and kagnetivation is taken ror $t_3$ s. Eccording to Sun et al., fos superspin oc cluster -glaws, tye relabxtion during $t_3$ should bv uhe continyation of the relawatiov at $t_1$.[@Sun; @Bandyo'cdyyay; @Vijay] The onsdt jf Fmg. \[fig:WcingRej\] (a) shmws ghe telaxxtion au $t_1$ xnd $y_3$. The relaxation durhng $f_3$ has the same funvtlonal forn as duryng $t_1$ but is xhifted upward. Figkre. \[fij:AgingCej\] (b) echifits the relaxation under simimar protofol but with a sero field betwezn $t_1$ and $t_3$. As clear from the inset of Fij. \[fig:AgingRej\] (b), the relaxqtion at $t_3$ is the cpktinuation
. Such a behavior is generally observed or where the flipping time of is longer than that atomic spin-glass, and the observation time in units of flipping time is relatively shorter in comparison of atomic spin-glass.[@Markovich; @Markovich1; @Jonsson; @Sankar] of this, the length scales probed during the experimental time scale are shorter the for i.e. length scales probed during the experimental time scale are larger than the so called overlap length, not satisfied.[@Jonsson] The absence of complete rejuvenation in memory may also occur the probing field is strong to the intrinsic dynamics the system. Temperature-field cycling relaxation ---------------------------------------- The relaxation experiments discussed in previous section are complemented with an intermediate negative thermal cycling and without Figure. \[fig:AgingRej\] shows result temperature cycling without under ZFC protocol. Here the sample 50 K in zero field, then 100 Oe is applied the magnetization is recorded as a of time for $t_1$ s. Then keeping the constant, the temperature is changed to 40 K and magnetization is recorded for $t_2$ s. is again brought to K (without changing field) magnetization taken $t_3$ s. to Sun et al., for superspin or cluster -glass, the relaxation $t_3$ should be the continuation of the relaxation at $t_1$.[@Sun; The of Fig. \[fig:AgingRej\] shows the relaxation at and The relaxation during $t_3$ same form but shifted Figure. \[fig:AgingRej\] (b) exhibits relaxation under similar protocol but a zero field between from the inset of Fig. \[fig:AgingRej\] (b), the at $t_3$ is the continuation
. Such a behavior is generally oBserved in sUpersPin-GlaSs Or clUsteR-glass where the MIcroScopic flipping time of thE flucTuATing MAgNetic EntitieS (SuPERspInS) iS muCh LOnGer thAn tHat of atOmic spin-glAss, AnD therefore, thE ObServation tIme In units of micRosCopic fLiPpiNG time Is rElatiVely shORter in ComparisoN oF Atomic SPin-glasS.[@mArKoviCh; @Markovich1; @JonssoN; @saNKar] Because of thIs, the lEnGTh SCAleS prObed during ThE expeRImental TImE SCAle ARe shorter and tHe condition FOr rEjuvenAtIon, I.E. the leNgth sCaLEs pRobed during The eXperimentAl time SCale are LArger thAn the sO caLleD oveRLaP lEngTh, IS noT SaTisFIed.[@jonsson] THe AbSence Of coMPLETe reJuvEnatIon in zFC memory may aLso OccuR If tHe proBing fIeld Is StronG enougH to peRtUrb the intrinsic Non-eQuilibriuM dyNaMicS oF the sPIn-glasS sySteM.

TemperAture-fiELd cYcLING aNd relaxation
----------------------------------------

The relAxATIoN experimEnts diSCuSsED in previOuS seCtioN ARe comPlemENtEd with an IntermEDiAtE negatiVe ThermaL cYclIng With aND witHout fiEld changE. FiguRE. \[fig:AgingRej\] (a) sHOws the result oF TeMPErATure CycLing without FielD ChanGe unDEr zFC PRotocOl. HerE tHE sAMple is cooled to 50 K in zeRo Field, tHen 100 Oe Field is applieD and the magNETIzation iS recORdED as a function of Time fOr $t_1$ s. Then keEPing the fIeld cOnstant, tHe temperaTURe is chanGed To 40 K And MagNETiZation is recorDED for $T_2$ s. thereafTer TemperaTurE is AgaIn bRoUght to 50 K (wiThout chaNgInG tHe FieLd) and MAgnetizaTiOn iS tAkeN for $t_3$ S. accordIng to sun eT aL., fOR suPerspin OR cLUSter -GlAsS, the RelAxAtion DuriNG $t_3$ sHould be The continUatIOn of ThE rElaxatiOn at $t_1$.[@Sun; @BandyOpAdhyay; @VijaY] THe iNset of fIG. \[fig:AginGRej\] (a) shows the relaxation AT $t_1$ and $t_3$. THe rElaxaTion During $t_3$ haS thE same fUncTIonal fOrm as dUring $T_1$ bUt iS SHifteD UPwArd. fiGure. \[fig:AgiNGrej\] (B) exhiBiTs thE relaxaTion under similar prOTocOl but with a zerO fiEld bETWeEn $t_1$ ANd $T_3$. as cLeAR frOM The inset of Fig. \[fiG:AgingRej\] (b), ThE ReLaxation at $T_3$ Is tHe ContinuAtion
. Such a behavior is gener ally obser ved i n s upe rs pin- glas s or cluster-g l asswhere the microscopicflipp in g  tim e  o f the  fluctu a ti n g  ma gn et icen t it ies ( sup erspins ) is muchlon ge r than thato fatomic spi n-g lass, and th ere fore,th e o b serva tio n tim e in u n its of  microsco pi c  flipp i ng time i srela tively shorter in co m parison of ato mic sp in - gl a s s.[ @Ma rkovich; @ Ma rkovi c h1; @Jo n ss o n ;  @S a nkar] Because  of this, t h e l engthsc ale s  probe d dur in g  th e experimen taltime scal e ares hortera nd thecondit ion  fo r re j uv en ati on ,  i. e .the len gth scal es  p robed  dur i n g theexp erim ental  time scale a relarg e r t han t he so  cal le d ove rlap l ength ,is not satisfie d.[@ Jonsson]The  a bse nc e ofc omplet e r eju venatio n in ZF C  me mo r y ma y also occur if th ep r ob ing fiel d is s t ro ng enough t oper turb t he in trin s ic  non-equ ilibri u mdy namicsof  the s pi n-g las s sys t em.
Tempe rature-f ieldc ycling and rel a xation
------ - -- - - -- - ---- --- ----------- ---- - ---
The re lax a tionexper im e nt s  discussed in previ ou s sect ion a re complement ed with an i n termedia te n e ga t ive thermal cy cling  with andw ithout f ieldchange.Figure. \ [ f ig:Aging Rej \](a)  sh o w sthe result of t empe ra ture cy cli ng with out  fi eld  ch an ge underZFC prot oc ol .He rethe s a mple isco ole dto50 Ki n zero  fiel d, t he n1 00Oe fiel d  i s appl ie dandthe  m agnet izat i onis reco rded as a  fu n ctio nof  time f or $t_1$ s. T he n keepingth e f ield c o n stant, t he temperature is chang e d to 40  Kand m agne tizationisrecord edf or $t_ 2$ s.There af ter t emper a t ur e i sagain brou g h t t o 50K(wit hout ch anging the field)a ndmagnetization  is  tak e n  f or$ t_ 3 $ s .A cco r d ing to Sun et a l., for su pe r sp in or clus t er-g lass, t he rela xatio n  during  $t_3$ sh ould be t he  con t i nua tion of th e relaxa tion at $ t _1$.[ @ Su n; @B and yopadh ya y;@Vija y] The ins et of  Fig.\[ fig:Ag ingRe j\ ] (a) sh ows the relaxation at $ t_1$ a nd $t _3$ . The rel axa t ion  during $ t_3$  has the s ame  fu nctio nal formas d u ri ng$ t_1$buti s shifted up war d .  F igure. \[fi g : A gin gRej\ ] ( b ) exhi bits  the relaxation u n der similar pr otoc o l  bu t w i th a  z ero field betw een  $ t _ 1$ and $ t_ 3$. As clea r from t he inset  of Fi g. \[f ig:Agin g R ej \ ] (b),  the  re laxationat$t _ 3$ is t he  c o ntinua tion 
. Such_a behavior_is generally observed in_superspin-glass or_cluster-glass_where the_microscopic_flipping time of_the fluctuating magnetic_entities (superspins) is much_longer than that_of_atomic spin-glass, and therefore, the observation time in units of microscopic flipping time is_relatively_shorter in_comparison_of_atomic spin-glass.[@Markovich; @Markovich1; @Jonsson; @Sankar]_Because of this, the length_scales probed_during the experimental time scale are shorter and_the_condition for rejuvenation,_i.e. the length scales probed during the experimental time_scale are larger than the so_called overlap length,_is_not_satisfied.[@Jonsson] The absence of_complete rejuvenation in ZFC memory may_also occur if the probing field_is strong enough to perturb the intrinsic_non-equilibrium dynamics of the spin-glass system.

Temperature-field_cycling and relaxation
----------------------------------------

The relaxation experiments_discussed in_previous section are complemented with_an intermediate negative_thermal cycling_with and without_field change. Figure. \[fig:AgingRej\] (a) shows the result_of temperature cycling_without field change under ZFC protocol._Here_the sample is_cooled_to_50 K in_zero field, then_100 Oe_field is_applied_and the magnetization is recorded as_a_function of time for $t_1$ s. Then keeping_the field constant, the_temperature_is changed to 40 K_and magnetization is recorded for_$t_2$ s. Thereafter temperature is again brought_to 50 K_(without changing_the field) and magnetization is taken for $t_3$ s. According to Sun_et al., for superspin or cluster_-glass, the relaxation during_$t_3$ should_be_the continuation of_the_relaxation at_$t_1$.[@Sun; @Bandyopadhyay; @Vijay] The inset of Fig. \[fig:AgingRej\]_(a) shows_the relaxation at $t_1$ and $t_3$._The relaxation during $t_3$_has_the same functional form as during_$t_1$ but is shifted upward. Figure. \[fig:AgingRej\] (b)_exhibits the relaxation under similar_protocol_but_with a zero field between_$t_1$ and $t_3$. As clear from_the inset of_Fig. \[fig:AgingRej\] (b), the relaxation at $t_3$ is the_continuation