omega}^{1}\,.\end{aligned}$$ The largest corrections to the above approach occur for the PNC pion-exchange interaction which, due to its long range, produces some extra energy dependence and sizable $P\leftrightarrow D$ transition amplitudes. They can show up when the contribution of the $S\leftrightarrow P$ transition amplitude is suppressed, like in this work.

For $\omega_{\gamma}=2.235$ MeV, which is very close to the disintegration threshold, we get the asymmetry $$\begin{aligned}
A_{\gamma}^{(th)} & \approx & \left[-8.44\, h_{\rho}^{0}-17.65\, h_{\rho}^{2}+3.63\, h_{\omega}^{0}\right.\nonumber \\
 &  & \left.\hspace{2cm}+O(c_{1},c_{3},c_{6})\right]\times10^{-3}\,.\label{eq:A-threshold}\end{aligned}$$ Using the DDH “best” values as an estimate, we got $A_{\gamma}^{(th)}\approx2.53\times10^{-8}$. By detailed balancing, one expects that $A_{\gamma}^{(th)}$ equals the circular polarization $P_{\gamma}^{(th)}$ observed in the radiative thermal neutron capture by proton, given the same kinematics. Though our result does not exactly correspond to the same kinematics as the inverse process usually considered (the kinetic energy of thermal neutrons $\sim$0.025 eV), it agrees both in sign and order of magnitude with existing calculations of $P_{\gamma}^{(th)}$ [@Lassey:1975; @Desplanques:1975; @Craver:1976am]. We also performed a similar calculation for the latter case with A$v_{18}$, and the result is $$\begin{aligned}
P_{\gamma}^{(th)} & \approx & \left[-8.75\, h_{\rho}^{0}-17.47\, h_{\rho}^{2}+3.39\, h_{\omega}^{0}\right.\nonumber \\
 &  & \left.\hspace{2cm}+O(c_{1},c_{3},c_{6})\right]\times10^{-3}\,.\end{aligned}$$ This is very close to the result of $A_{\gamma}$ quoted above.

It is noticed that our expression of $A_{\gamma}^{(th)}$ at very low energy, and therefore that one for $P_{\gamma}^{(th)}$, contains a contribution from the
omega}^{1}\,.\end{aligned}$$ The largest corrections to the above approach occur for the PNC pion - substitution interaction which, due to its retentive range, produces some extra department of energy dependence and sizable $ P\leftrightarrow D$ transition amplitude. They can show up when the contribution of the $ S\leftrightarrow P$ transition amplitude is suppress, like in this work. 

 For $ \omega_{\gamma}=2.235 $ MeV, which is very close to the annihilation threshold, we get the asymmetry $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 A_{\gamma}^{(th) } & \approx & \left[-8.44\, h_{\rho}^{0}-17.65\, h_{\rho}^{2}+3.63\, h_{\omega}^{0}\right.\nonumber \\ 
  &   & \left.\hspace{2cm}+O(c_{1},c_{3},c_{6})\right]\times10^{-3}\,.\label{eq: A - threshold}\end{aligned}$$ use the DDH “ good ” values as an appraisal, we got $ A_{\gamma}^{(th)}\approx2.53\times10^{-8}$. By detailed reconciliation, one expect that $ A_{\gamma}^{(th)}$ equals the circular polarization $ P_{\gamma}^{(th)}$ observed in the radiative thermal neutron capture by proton, yield the same kinematics. Though our result does not precisely correspond to the like kinematics as the inverse process normally considered (the kinetic energy of thermal neutrons $ \sim$0.025 eV), it agree both in sign and order of magnitude with existing calculations of $ P_{\gamma}^{(th)}$ [ @Lassey:1975; @Desplanques:1975; @Craver:1976am ]. We besides perform a similar calculation for the latter case with A$ v_{18}$, and the result is $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 P_{\gamma}^{(th) } & \approx & \left[-8.75\, h_{\rho}^{0}-17.47\, h_{\rho}^{2}+3.39\, h_{\omega}^{0}\right.\nonumber \\ 
  &   & \left.\hspace{2cm}+O(c_{1},c_{3},c_{6})\right]\times10^{-3}\,.\end{aligned}$$ This is very close to the result of $ A_{\gamma}$ quoted above. 

 It is noticed that our expression of $ A_{\gamma}^{(th)}$ at very low department of energy, and consequently that one for $ P_{\gamma}^{(th)}$, contains a contribution from the
omeha}^{1}\,.\end{aligned}$$ The largest corrections to the abmve aplroach ozcur for the PNC pion-exchangx inreracupon which, due to its uong rangv, producew sonw extra enxdgy depcudencs and wizable $P\leftrlghtarrow D$ transition am[lktbdes. They can show up when the contrybution ov the $S\leftrigrtargor P$ fgaksition amplitude is suppressed, mike in this work.

For $\omega_{\gamma}=2.235$ MeV, which is vfry flose to the disinhegration tyresrild, we get tfe asymmetgv $$\begin{alighed}
A_{\gamma}^{(th)} & \approx & \left[-8.44\, h_{\rho}^{0}-17.65\, f_{\rho}^{2}+3.63\, k_{\omega}^{0}\right.\bobumhgr \\
 &  & \left.\hwpace{2bm}+O(c_{1},c_{3},c_{6})\right]\times10^{-3}\,.\label{aq:A-threxhold}\end{alignec}$$ Uvint the DDH “best” values as an estimate, we got $A_{\gamka}^{(ch)}\approx2.53\times10^{-8}$. By detaulwd bananchng, ube dxptctx fhat $A_{\hamja}^{(th)}$ equala the circuoar polarization $P_{\gsmiq}^{(th)}$ observed jn the rwdiative thermal neutron capture by prouon, gjven the same kinematicw. Though our result dles not evactly correspond to the same kinematics as the itversx oroecfr udually considered (the kinetic energy of thermwm meltrons $\sim$0.025 eV), it cgrees both in sogj sgd order of mxgnitubs sith existing calcklationf of $P_{\gamma}^{(th)}$ [@Jassry:1975; @Desplanques:1975; @Craver:1976am]. We qlso performvd a similar calculatiln for the uattgr casr with A$v_{18}$, and the resulc is $$\bsgin{aligned}
O_{\gamma}^{(th)} & \xpprox & \left[-8.75\, h_{\rhu}^{0}-17.47\, h_{\gho}^{2}+3.39\, v_{\omega}^{0}\right.\nonumber \\
 &  & \lest.\hspace{2cn}+O(c_{1},c_{3},e_{6})\right]\tioes10^{-3}\,.\emd{aligged}$$ This id vern close to the resupt of $A_{\camma}$ quotfd above.

It is noticed that our xepression of $S_{\gdmmd}^{(th)}$ at vzry loe energy, and eherefore that one fox $P_{\gamoa}^{(th)}$, contapns a convribution frjm the
omega}^{1}\,.\end{aligned}$$ The largest corrections to the above for PNC pion-exchange which, due to extra dependence and sizable D$ transition amplitudes. can show up when the contribution the $S\leftrightarrow P$ transition amplitude is suppressed, like in this work. For $\omega_{\gamma}=2.235$ which is very close to the disintegration threshold, we get the asymmetry $$\begin{aligned} & & h_{\rho}^{0}-17.65\, h_{\omega}^{0}\right.\nonumber \\ & & \left.\hspace{2cm}+O(c_{1},c_{3},c_{6})\right]\times10^{-3}\,.\label{eq:A-threshold}\end{aligned}$$ Using the DDH “best” values as an estimate, we got $A_{\gamma}^{(th)}\approx2.53\times10^{-8}$. detailed balancing, one expects that $A_{\gamma}^{(th)}$ equals the polarization $P_{\gamma}^{(th)}$ observed in radiative thermal neutron capture by given same kinematics. our does exactly correspond to same kinematics as the inverse process usually considered (the kinetic energy of thermal neutrons $\sim$0.025 eV), it both in order of with calculations $P_{\gamma}^{(th)}$ [@Lassey:1975; @Desplanques:1975; also performed a similar calculation for with A$v_{18}$, and the result is $$\begin{aligned} P_{\gamma}^{(th)} \approx & h_{\rho}^{0}-17.47\, h_{\rho}^{2}+3.39\, h_{\omega}^{0}\right.\nonumber \\ & & This is very close to the result of quoted above. It is noticed that our expression of $A_{\gamma}^{(th)}$ at very low energy, and one for $P_{\gamma}^{(th)}$, contains contribution from the
omega}^{1}\,.\end{aligned}$$ The largest CorrectionS to thE abOve ApProaCh ocCur for the PNC piON-excHange interaction which, dUe to iTs LOng rANgE, prodUces somE ExTRA enErGy DepEnDEnCe and SizAble $P\leFtrightarrOw D$ TrAnsition amplITuDes. They can ShoW up when the coNtrIbutioN oF thE $s\leftRigHtarrOw P$ traNSition Amplitude Is SUppresSEd, like iN THiS worK.

For $\omega_{\gamma}=2.235$ MeV, WHiCH is very close to The disInTEgRATioN thReshold, we gEt The asYMmetry $$\bEGiN{ALIgnED}
A_{\gamma}^{(th)} & \apprOx & \left[-8.44\, h_{\rho}^{0}-17.65\, h_{\RHo}^{2}+3.63\, h_{\Omega}^{0}\rIgHt.\nONumber \\
 &  & \Left.\hSpACe{2cM}+O(c_{1},c_{3},c_{6})\right]\tImes10^{-3}\,.\Label{eq:A-tHreshoLD}\end{aliGNed}$$ UsinG the DDh “beSt” vAlueS As An EstImATe, wE GoT $A_{\gAMma}^{(Th)}\approx2.53\TiMeS10^{-8}$. By deTailED BALancIng, One eXpectS that $A_{\gamma}^{(th)}$ EquAls tHE ciRculaR polaRizaTiOn $P_{\gaMma}^{(th)}$ oBservEd In the radiative tHermAl neutron CapTuRe bY pRoton, GIven thE saMe kInematiCs. ThougH Our ReSULT dOes not exactly correSpOND tO the same KinemaTIcS aS The inverSe ProCess USUally ConsIDeRed (the kiNetic eNErGy Of thermAl NeutroNs $\Sim$0.025 EV), iT agreES botH in sigN and ordeR of maGNitude with exisTIng calculatioNS oF $p_{\GaMMa}^{(th)}$ [@lasSey:1975; @DesplanqUes:1975; @CRAver:1976Am]. We ALsO peRFormeD a simIlAR cALculation for the lattEr Case wiTh A$v_{18}$, aNd the result is $$\Begin{alignED}
p_{\Gamma}^{(th)} & \aPproX & \LeFT[-8.75\, h_{\rho}^{0}-17.47\, h_{\rho}^{2}+3.39\, h_{\omegA}^{0}\righT.\nonumber \\
 &  & \lEFt.\hspace{2Cm}+O(c_{1},c_{3},C_{6})\right]\tiMes10^{-3}\,.\end{aliGNEd}$$ This is VerY clOse To tHE ReSult of $A_{\gamma}$ qUOTed aBoVe.

It is nOtiCed that Our ExpResSioN oF $A_{\gamma}^{(th)}$ At very loW eNeRgY, aNd tHerefORe that onE fOr $P_{\GaMma}^{(Th)}$, conTAins a cOntriButiOn FrOM thE
omega}^{1}\,.\end{aligned} $$ The lar gestcor rec ti onsto t he above appro a ch o ccur for the PNC pion- excha ng e  int e ra ction  which, du e toit slon gr an ge, p rod uces so me extra e ner gy  dependencea nd  sizable $ P\l eftrightarro w D $ tran si tio n  ampl itu des.They c a n show  up whenth e  contr i butiono f  t he $ S\leftrightarrowP $t ransition ampl itudeis su p p res sed , like inth is wo r k.

For $\ o m e ga_ { \gamma}=2.235 $ MeV, whic h  is  verycl ose to the  disi nt e gra tion thresh old,  we get t he asy m metry $ $ \begin{ aligne d}A_{ \gam m a} ^{ (th )} & \ a pp rox & \ left[-8. 44 \,  h_{\ rho} ^ { 0 } -17. 65\ , h_ {\rho }^{2}+3.63\,h_{ \ome g a}^ {0}\r ight. \non um ber \ \
 & & \le ft .\hspace{2cm}+O (c_{ 1},c_{3}, c_{ 6} )\r ig ht]\t i mes10^ {-3 }\, .\label {eq:A-t h res ho l d } \e nd{aligned}$$ Usin gt h eDDH “bes t” val u es  a s  an esti ma te,  weg o t $A_ {\ga m ma }^{(th)} \appro x 2. 53 \times1 0^ {-8}$.  B y d eta iledb alan cing,one expe cts t h at $A_{\gamma} ^ {(th)}$ equal s  t h e  c i rcul arpolarizatio n $P _ {\ga mma} ^ {( th) } $ obs erved  i n  t h e radiative thermal  n eutron  capt ure by proton , given th e s ame kine mati c s. Though our res ult d oes not ex a ctly cor respo nd to th e same ki n e matics a s t heinv ers e pr ocess usually c onsi de red (th e k ineticene rgy  of  th er mal neutr ons $\si m$ 0. 02 5eV) , ita grees bo th  in  s ign  ando rder o f mag nitu de  w i thexistin g  c a l cula ti on s of  $P _{ \gamm a}^{ ( th) }$ [@La ssey:1975 ; @ D espl an qu es:1975 ; @Craver:197 6a m]. We als oper formed a  similar  calculation for the la t ter cas e w ith A $v_{ 18}$, and  th e resu lti s $$\b egin{a ligne d} 
P_ { \ gamma } ^ {( th) }& \approx& \le ft[-8 .7 5\,h_{\rho }^{0}-17.47\, h_{\ r ho} ^{2}+3.39\, h _{\ omeg a } ^{ 0}\ r ig h t.\ no n umb e r  \\
 &  & \left .\hspace{2 cm } +O (c_{1},c_{ 3 },c _{ 6})\rig ht]\tim es10^ { -3}\,.\ end{align ed}$$ Thi sis v e r y c lose to th e result  of $A_{\ g amma} $  q uoted  ab ove.
It  is  noti ced th a t o ur ex pressi on  of $A _{\ga mm a}^{(th) }$ at very low energy,and th erefo rethat onefor $P_ {\gamma}^ {(th )}$, conta ins  acontr ibu t ion f romt he 
omega}^{1}\,.\end{aligned}$$ The_largest corrections_to the above approach_occur for_the_PNC pion-exchange_interaction_which, due to_its long range,_produces some extra energy_dependence and sizable_$P\leftrightarrow_D$ transition amplitudes. They can show up when the contribution of the $S\leftrightarrow P$_transition_amplitude is_suppressed,_like_in this work.

For $\omega_{\gamma}=2.235$ MeV,_which is very close to_the disintegration_threshold, we get the asymmetry $$\begin{aligned}
A_{\gamma}^{(th)} & \approx_&_\left[-8.44\, h_{\rho}^{0}-17.65\, h_{\rho}^{2}+3.63\,_h_{\omega}^{0}\right.\nonumber \\
 &  & \left.\hspace{2cm}+O(c_{1},c_{3},c_{6})\right]\times10^{-3}\,.\label{eq:A-threshold}\end{aligned}$$ Using the DDH_“best” values as an estimate, we_got $A_{\gamma}^{(th)}\approx2.53\times10^{-8}$. By_detailed_balancing,_one expects that $A_{\gamma}^{(th)}$_equals the circular polarization $P_{\gamma}^{(th)}$ observed_in the radiative thermal neutron capture_by proton, given the same kinematics. Though_our result does not exactly correspond_to the same kinematics as_the inverse_process usually considered (the kinetic_energy of thermal_neutrons $\sim$0.025_eV), it agrees_both in sign and order of_magnitude with existing_calculations of $P_{\gamma}^{(th)}$ [@Lassey:1975; @Desplanques:1975; @Craver:1976am]._We_also performed a_similar_calculation_for the_latter case with_A$v_{18}$,_and the_result_is $$\begin{aligned}
P_{\gamma}^{(th)} & \approx & \left[-8.75\,_h_{\rho}^{0}-17.47\,_h_{\rho}^{2}+3.39\, h_{\omega}^{0}\right.\nonumber \\
 &  & \left.\hspace{2cm}+O(c_{1},c_{3},c_{6})\right]\times10^{-3}\,.\end{aligned}$$_This is very close_to_the result of $A_{\gamma}$_quoted above.

It is noticed that_our expression of $A_{\gamma}^{(th)}$ at very_low energy,_and therefore_that one for $P_{\gamma}^{(th)}$, contains a contribution from the