 however, and thus this is simply a poor choice of representation of the system at this point. It is entirely analogous to the singularity in $\frac{\d r}{\d\theta}$ in the polar coordinate description of a straight line; there at the point of closest approach to the origin $r$ is it a minimum whilst $\theta$ changes, and thus in these variables the system appears singular. However, the equation $y=mx+c$ remains well defined at this point. The question then arises as to whether this could be the asymptotic behaviour as $\beta \rightarrow \pi/2$. The answer is that if $V$ obeys the conditions of regularity then it cannot, as the motion asymptotes to that of a free field.

Recovering the free field in these circumstances amounts to setting $V$ and its derivatives to zero. Upon doing so we note two interesting features; the first is that $\chi$ becomes unimporant in dynamics, as it only enters the equations of motion for $\alpha$ and $\lambda$ through terms proportional to derivatives of the potential. Hence we can integrate the equation of motion for $\lambda$ directly in this case to obtain \_ = \[lambdafree\] wherein $\lambda_0$ is a constant. Reintroducing this into the equation of motion for $\alpha$ gives the equation for a straight line in the $(\phi_1,\phi_2)$ plane. Second, we see that this feature only relied upon there being non-zero derivatives of $V$. Had we introduced a pure cosmological constant term (corresponding to $V$ being constant) the equations of motion would have been unaffected. From equation \[lambdafree\] we see that = and so is decreasing (to zero) at the singularity. Thus when the fall-off conditions for the potential are obeyed, the system is always integrable through the singularity.

Extending our system to $n$ scalar fields is a simple exercise; first we note that at any point in the evolution of the system we can choose coordinates for the scalar fields such that the position and velocity of the fields are in the plane spanned by $\phi_1$ and $\phi_2$. If we describe the positions and velocities of our fields in terms of spherical coordinates, with positions given by equation \[SphericalShapeCoordinates2\] and velocities given by $$\label{SphericalShapeCoordinates3}
\left( \begin{array}{c}\phi_1\\ \phi_2 \\...\\ \phi
however, and thus this is simply a poor choice of theatrical performance of the arrangement at this point. It is entirely analogous to the singularity in $ \frac{\d r}{\d\theta}$ in the pivotal coordinate description of a true line; there at the point of close approach path to the origin $ r$ is it a minimum whilst $ \theta$ changes, and thus in these variables the organization appears singular. However, the equality $ y = mx+c$ remains well defined at this point. The question then arises as to whether this could be the asymptotic behaviour as $ \beta \rightarrow \pi/2$. The solution is that if $ V$ obeys the conditions of regularity then it cannot, as the motion asymptotes to that of a detached field. 

 Recovering the complimentary field in these fortune amounts to setting $ V$ and its derivatives to zero. Upon doing so we notice two interesting features; the first is that $ \chi$ becomes unimporant in dynamics, as it only enters the equation of motion for $ \alpha$ and $ \lambda$ through terms proportional to derivatives of the potential. Hence we can integrate the equation of motion for $ \lambda$ directly in this case to receive \ _ = \[lambdafree\ ] wherein $ \lambda_0 $ is a constant. Reintroducing this into the equation of apparent motion for $ \alpha$ gives the equation for a straight line in the $ (\phi_1,\phi_2)$ airplane. Second, we see that this feature of speech only relied upon there being non - zero derivatives of $ V$. Had we introduce a pure cosmological constant term (corresponding to $ V$ being constant) the equations of motion would have been unaffected. From equation \[lambdafree\ ] we see that = and therefore is decreasing (to zero) at the singularity. therefore when the spill - off conditions for the potential are obeyed, the system is always integrable through the singularity. 

 Extending our system to $ n$ scalar battlefield is a simple exercise; foremost we note that at any point in the evolution of the system we can choose coordinates for the scalar sphere such that the position and velocity of the fields are in the airplane spanned by $ \phi_1 $ and $ \phi_2$. If we describe the situation and velocities of our fields in term of spherical coordinates, with positions given by equation \[SphericalShapeCoordinates2\ ] and velocities given by $ $ \label{SphericalShapeCoordinates3 } 
 \left (\begin{array}{c}\phi_1\\ \phi_2 \\... \\ \phi
 hoaever, and thus this is slmply a poor chonxe of cepresehtation uf the system at this point. Mt iw enturely analogous to the singularpty in $\frqc{\d c}{\d\theta}$ in the polar coovbinats desermption of a strsight line; there at the [oknc of closest approach to the origin $w$ is it a minimum whilsj $\theua$ shanfvs, and thus in these variables fhe sysuem appears singulsr. However, the equation $y=md+c$ rfmains well definef at this piint. Rhe question then arists as to whejher this could be the asymptotiz behcviour as $\bgcq \rlchtarrow \pi/2$. The wnswer is that if $V$ mbeys tne conditions pf ceguoarity then it cannot, as the motion asyiptotes tm chat of a free field.

Rwciveritg tve ffwe wiemd ih thesf cmrcumstancea amounts ti setting $V$ and its dqgovatives to aero. U[og doing so we note two interesting featlres; the first is that $\chi$ vecomes unimporant in dynamics, as it only enters the equations of motion for $\al[ha$ aid $\lanbqx$ tjrough terms proportional to derivatives of trs kotvntial. Hence we ccn integrate the eeusjion of motion for $\lcjbsa$ directly in thid case jo obtqin \_ = \[lamfdaftee\] wherein $\lambda_0$ is a conwtant. Reintrjeucing this into tke equation uf mption for $\alpha$ gives the eqbation for a stralght line kn the $(\phi_1,\phi_2)$ plxne. Sacond, we see that this feaeure only relned upon thete beind non-zero ferivatives of $V$. Had we lntrobuced a pure codmological constant term (corres'pnding to $V$ nehng constanc) the cquations of moeion would havg been uncffectdd. From eqlation \[lakbdafree\] we see that = ang so is decreesing (to sero) at rhe sinejlarity. Thus wnen the fcjl-ofd conditions for tme pojehtial are obeyeb, uhw system is aleayr igtvgreble evrough the shnguuarkyy.

Extdnding our whstek to $n$ scalar fields is z simple exercise; givst we noje that ae any point im the evolution of the vysvem we cag choose coordinates for the sdalar fiepds such that tre pisition and relocity of the fields are in the plane wpanned by $\phi_1$ and $\phi_2$. If we describe uhe positions and delocitiev of our fields in twrms of spherical coordinates, with posjtions givej by equation \[SphericalShapeCoordinates2\] and velocities given by $$\label{SpheeicalSia[eCoordinatss3}
\legt( \beciu{arxay}{c}\phi_1\\ \phi_2 \\...\\ \phi
however, and thus this is simply a of of the at this point. the in $\frac{\d r}{\d\theta}$ the polar coordinate of a straight line; there at point of closest approach to the origin $r$ is it a minimum whilst changes, and thus in these variables the system appears singular. However, the equation remains defined this The question then arises as to whether this could be the asymptotic behaviour as $\beta \rightarrow The answer is that if $V$ obeys the of regularity then it as the motion asymptotes to of free field. the field these circumstances amounts setting $V$ and its derivatives to zero. Upon doing so we note two interesting features; the first that $\chi$ in dynamics, it enters equations of motion and $\lambda$ through terms proportional to potential. Hence we can integrate the equation of for $\lambda$ in this case to obtain \_ \[lambdafree\] wherein $\lambda_0$ is a constant. Reintroducing this the equation of motion for $\alpha$ gives the equation for a straight line in the Second, we see that feature only relied there non-zero of Had we a pure cosmological constant term (corresponding to $V$ being constant) the of motion would have been unaffected. From equation \[lambdafree\] we = so is decreasing zero) at the singularity. when fall-off conditions for the obeyed, system through singularity. our system to $n$ fields is a simple exercise; we note that at of the system we can choose coordinates for scalar fields such that the position and of the fields are in the plane spanned by $\phi_1$ and $\phi_2$. we describe and velocities of our fields in terms of coordinates, with positions given equation \[SphericalShapeCoordinates2\] and velocities given by $$\label{SphericalShapeCoordinates3} \left( \begin{array}{c}\phi_1\\ \\...\\
 however, and thus this is simplY a poor choiCe of rEprEseNtAtioN of tHe system at this POint. it is entirely analogous tO the sInGUlarITy In $\fraC{\d r}{\d\theTA}$ iN THe pOlAr CooRdINaTe desCriPtion of A straight lIne; ThEre at the poinT Of Closest appRoaCh to the origiN $r$ iS it a miNiMum WHilst $\TheTa$ chaNges, anD Thus in These variAbLEs the sYStem appEARs SingUlar. However, the equATiON $y=mx+c$ remains weLl defiNeD At THIs pOinT. The questiOn Then aRIses as tO WhETHEr tHIs could be the aSymptotic beHAviOur as $\bEtA \riGHtarroW \pi/2$. ThE aNSweR is that if $V$ oBeys The conditIons of REgulariTY then it Cannot, As tHe mOtioN AsYmPtoTeS To tHAt Of a FRee Field.

RecOvErIng thE freE FIELd in TheSe ciRcumsTances amounts To sEttiNG $V$ aNd its DerivAtivEs To zerO. Upon dOing sO wE note two interesTing Features; tHe fIrSt iS tHat $\chI$ BecomeS unImpOrant in DynamicS, As iT oNLY EnTers the equations of MoTIOn For $\alpha$ And $\lamBDa$ ThROugh termS pRopOrtiONAl to dErivATiVes of the PotentIAl. heNce we caN iNtegraTe The EquAtion OF motIon for $\Lambda$ diRectlY In this case to obTAin \_ = \[lambdafree\] WHeREIn $\LAmbdA_0$ is A constant. ReIntrODuciNg thIS iNto THe equAtion Of MOtIOn for $\alpha$ gives the eQuAtion fOr a stRaight line in tHe $(\phi_1,\phi_2)$ plANE. second, we See tHAt THis feature only RelieD upon there BEing non-zEro deRivativeS of $V$. Had we INTroduced A puRe cOsmOloGICaL constant term (CORresPoNding to $v$ beIng consTanT) thE eqUatIoNs of motioN would haVe BeEn UnAffEcted. fRom equatIoN \[laMbDafRee\] we SEe that = And so Is deCrEaSIng (To zero) aT ThE SInguLaRiTy. ThUs wHeN the fAll-oFF coNditionS for the poTenTIal aRe ObEyed, the System is alwayS iNtegrable tHrOugH the siNGUlarity.

EXtending our system to $n$ scaLAr fieldS is A simpLe exErcise; firSt wE note tHat AT any poInt in tHe evoLuTioN OF the sYSTeM we CaN choose cooRDInaTes foR tHe scAlar fieLds such that the posiTIon And velocity of The FielDS ArE in THe PLanE sPAnnED By $\phi_1$ and $\phi_2$. If we Describe thE pOSiTions and veLOciTiEs of our Fields iN termS Of spherIcal coordInates, witH pOsitIONs gIven by equaTion \[SpheRicalShapEcoordINaTes2\] anD veLocitiEs GivEn by $$\lAbel{SpHEriCalShApeCooRdInates3}
\Left( \bEgIn{array}{c}\Phi_1\\ \phi_2 \\...\\ \phi
 however, and thus this is  simply apoorcho ice  o f re pres entation of th e  sys tem at this point. Itis en ti r elya na logou s to th e  s i n gul ar it y i n$ \f rac{\ d r }{\d\th eta}$ in t hepo lar coordina t edescriptio n o f a straight  li ne; th er e a t  thepoi nt of  close s t appr oach to t he origin $r$ isi t  a  min imum whilst $\the t a$ changes, and t hus in  t h es e var iab les the sy st em ap p ears si n gu l a r . H o wever, the eq uation $y=m x +c$  remai ns  we l l defi ned a tt his  point. The  que stion the n aris e s as to whether  thiscou ldbe t h eas ymp to t icb eh avi o uras $\bet a\r ighta rrow \ p i /2$.  Th e an sweris that if $V $ o beys the  cond ition s of  r egula rity t hen i tcannot, as themoti on asympt ote stoth at of a free  fi eld .

Reco veringt hefr e e fi eld in these circu ms t a nc es amoun ts tos et ti n g $V$ an dits  der i v ative s to ze ro. Upon  doing so  w e notetw o inte re sti ngfeatu r es;the fi rst is t hat $ \ chi$ becomes u n imporant in d y na m i cs ,  asitonly enters  the equa tion s  o f m o tionfor $ \a l ph a $ and $\lambda$ thr ou gh ter ms pr oportional to  derivativ e s of the p oten t ia l . Hence we can  inte grate thee quationof mo tion for  $\lambda $ directly  in  th iscas e to  obtain \_ =\ [ lamb da free\]whe rein $\ lam bda _0$  is  a  constant . Reintr od uc in gthi s int o  the equ at ion  o f m otion for $\ alpha $ gi ve st heequatio n  f o r  a s tr ai ghtlin ein th e $( \ phi _1,\phi _2)$ plan e.S econ d,  w e see t hat this feat ur e only rel ie d u pon th e r e beingnon-zero derivatives of $V$. Ha d w e int rodu ced a pur e c osmolo gic a l cons tant t erm ( co rre s p ondin g to  $V $being cons t a nt)  theeq uati ons ofmotion would haveb een  unaffected.Fro m eq u a ti on\ [l a mbd af r ee\ ] we see that = a nd so is d ec r ea sing (to z e ro)  a t the s ingular ity.T hus whe n the fal l-off con di tion s for  the poten tial are  obeyed,t he sy s te m isalw ays in te gra ble t hrough the  sing ularit y. 

Exte nding  o ur syste m to $n$ scalar fieldsis a s imple  ex ercise; f irs t  we  note tha t at  any point  in  th e evo lut i on of  the sy ste m  we c an c h oose coor d in ate s fo r the scala r f iel ds su cht hat th e po sition and veloci t y of the field s ar e inthe plan espanned by $\p hi_ 1$ a nd $\phi _2 $. If we de scribe t he posit ions a nd vel ocities o fo ur fie ldsinterms ofsph er i cal coo rd in a tes, w ithpo sition s give n  bye q uation \[Spheric alSha p e Coord i nat es2\]  a nd velo c itie s given by  $$\label{S pheric alSh apeCo ordinat es 3}
\le ft(  \ begin{arra y }{c}\phi_ 1\\ \ phi_2 \ \. ..\\  \p hi
 however,_and thus_this is simply a_poor choice_of_representation of_the_system at this_point. It is_entirely analogous to the_singularity in $\frac{\d_r}{\d\theta}$_in the polar coordinate description of a straight line; there at the point of_closest_approach to_the_origin_$r$ is it a minimum_whilst $\theta$ changes, and thus_in these_variables the system appears singular. However, the equation_$y=mx+c$_remains well defined_at this point. The question then arises as to_whether this could be the asymptotic_behaviour as $\beta_\rightarrow_\pi/2$._The answer is that_if $V$ obeys the conditions of_regularity then it cannot, as the_motion asymptotes to that of a free_field.

Recovering the free field in these_circumstances amounts to setting $V$_and its_derivatives to zero. Upon doing_so we note_two interesting_features; the first_is that $\chi$ becomes unimporant in_dynamics, as it_only enters the equations of motion_for_$\alpha$ and $\lambda$_through_terms_proportional to_derivatives of the_potential._Hence we_can_integrate the equation of motion for_$\lambda$_directly in this case to obtain \__= \[lambdafree\] wherein $\lambda_0$_is_a constant. Reintroducing this_into the equation of motion_for $\alpha$ gives the equation for_a straight_line in_the $(\phi_1,\phi_2)$ plane. Second, we see that this feature only relied_upon there being non-zero derivatives of_$V$. Had we introduced_a pure_cosmological_constant term (corresponding_to_$V$ being_constant) the equations of motion would have_been unaffected._From equation \[lambdafree\] we see that_= and so is_decreasing_(to zero) at the singularity. Thus_when the fall-off conditions for the_potential are obeyed, the system_is_always_integrable through the singularity.

Extending our_system to $n$ scalar fields is_a simple exercise;_first we note that at any point_in_the evolution of the system we_can_choose coordinates for the scalar fields_such_that_the position and velocity of_the fields are in the plane_spanned by $\phi_1$ and $\phi_2$. If we describe the_positions and velocities_of our fields in terms_of_spherical_coordinates, with positions given by equation \[SphericalShapeCoordinates2\] and velocities given_by $$\label{SphericalShapeCoordinates3}
\left(_\begin{array}{c}\phi_1\\ \phi_2 \\...\\_\phi