mathbb{R}/\mathcal{D})\simeq Hom(\pi_1(G)\to\mathbb{R}/\mathcal{D}).$$ Now assume $G=SL(2,\mathbb{R})$ and $\mathcal{D}=\mathbb{Z}$ so that $\mathbb{R}/\mathcal{D}\simeq U(1)$. The use of Iwazawa decomposition yields $SL(2,\mathbb{R})\simeq \mathbb{R}^2\times \mathbb{S}^1$, which combined with $\pi_1(X\times Y)=\pi_1(X)\times\pi_1(Y)$ for any topological spaces $X$ and $Y$ implies $\pi_1(SL(2,\mathbb{R}))\simeq\mathbb{Z}$. Hence, $Hom(\mathbb{Z}\to U(1))\simeq U(1)$ which classifies the inequivalent extensions of $SL(2,\mathbb{R})$ by $U(1)$. Accordingly, one expect that the extension of the present construction of $SL(2,\mathbb{R})$ gives rise to inequivalent classes of star-products.\

Quantized plane waves for $\mathbb{R}^3_\theta$
===============================================

The determination of which takes the generic form $$E_p(\hat{x})=\omega(p)e^{i\xi(p)\hat{x}} \label{generalform-ncexpo},$$ can be achieved through a standard albeit tedious computation whose main steps are summarized now.\
First, using $e^{i\xi(p)\hat{x}}\rhd 1 = \frac{e^{ipx}}{\omega(p)}$, one easily infers that $$e^{-i\xi(\lambda p) \hat{x}} \partial_\mu e^{i\xi(\lambda p) \hat{x}} = (i\lambda p_\mu) {{ \mathbb{I}}},\label{megaplus1}$$ which holds for any $\lambda\in\mathbb{R}$. Then, the combination of $[\partial_\mu, \hat{x}_\nu] = [\partial_\mu,x^a\varphi_{a\nu}] = \varphi_{\mu \nu}$ with the functional derivative of with respect to $\lambda$ yields $$\label{diff-xi}
\varphi_{\mu\nu}(i\lambda p) \frac{d}{d\lambda} \left[ \xi^\nu(\lambda p
mathbb{R}/\mathcal{D})\simeq Hom(\pi_1(G)\to\mathbb{R}/\mathcal{D}).$$ Now assume $ G = SL(2,\mathbb{R})$ and $ \mathcal{D}=\mathbb{Z}$ so that $ \mathbb{R}/\mathcal{D}\simeq U(1)$. The use of Iwazawa decay give $ SL(2,\mathbb{R})\simeq \mathbb{R}^2\times \mathbb{S}^1 $, which combined with $ \pi_1(X\times Y)=\pi_1(X)\times\pi_1(Y)$ for any topological spaces $ X$ and $ Y$ entail $ \pi_1(SL(2,\mathbb{R}))\simeq\mathbb{Z}$. therefore, $ Hom(\mathbb{Z}\to U(1))\simeq U(1)$ which classifies the inequivalent extensions of $ SL(2,\mathbb{R})$ by $ U(1)$. Accordingly, one ask that the extension of the present construction of $ SL(2,\mathbb{R})$ contribute rise to inequivalent classes of star topology - products.\ 

 Quantized plane wave for $ \mathbb{R}^3_\theta$ 
 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 

 The determination of which takes the generic form $ $ E_p(\hat{x})=\omega(p)e^{i\xi(p)\hat{x } } \label{generalform - ncexpo},$$ can be achieved through a standard albeit tedious calculation whose main steps are summarized now.\ 
 First, use $ e^{i\xi(p)\hat{x}}\rhd 1 = \frac{e^{ipx}}{\omega(p)}$, one easily infers that $ $ e^{-i\xi(\lambda p) \hat{x } } \partial_\mu e^{i\xi(\lambda p) \hat{x } } = (i\lambda p_\mu) { { \mathbb{I}}},\label{megaplus1}$$ which holds for any $ \lambda\in\mathbb{R}$. Then, the combination of $ [ \partial_\mu, \hat{x}_\nu ] = [ \partial_\mu, x^a\varphi_{a\nu } ] = \varphi_{\mu \nu}$ with the functional derived function of with respect to $ \lambda$ yields $ $ \label{diff - xi } 
 \varphi_{\mu\nu}(i\lambda p) \frac{d}{d\lambda } \left [ \xi^\nu(\lambda p
matjbb{R}/\mathcal{D})\simeq Hom(\pi_1(G)\uo\mathbb{R}/\mathcal{D}).$$ Now asvume $G=AL(2,\mathbb{F})$ and $\mathcal{D}=\mathbb{Z}$ so thav $\marhbb{R}/\nathcal{D}\simeq U(1)$. The usd of Iwazwwa deconposmtion yields $SL(2,\mefhbb{R})\simeq \mafmbb{R}^2\tnmxs \mathbb{S}^1$, whicm combined fith $\pi_1(X\times F)=\pk_1(X)\cimes\pi_1(Y)$ for any topological spaces $V$ and $Y$ ilplies $\pi_1(SL(2,\matrbb{R}))\xymeq\jathbb{Z}$. Hence, $Hom(\mathbb{Z}\to U(1))\simeq H(1)$ which classifies tne inequivalent extensions of $DL(2,\mathbb{R})$ by $U(1)$. Acclrdingly, ong ex[wct that the extension of the presgnt construction of $SL(2,\mathbb{R})$ gixes rnse to ineqoncalftt classes if stwr-products.\

Quantized [lane wsves for $\mathbn{R}^3_\theva$
===============================================

Thw determination of whmch takes the generis form $$E_p(\vac{x})=\omega(p)e^{i\xi(p)\hat{x}} \labwl{tenerdlfosm-ncdzpo},$$ cah ue zchievfd vhrough a sfandard albwit tedious computauiog whose main sfeps awe summarized now.\
First, using $e^{i\xi(p)\hat{x}}\rhd 1 = \rrac{e^{ipx}}{\omega(p)}$, one easioy infers that $$e^{-i\xi(\lalbda p) \hae{x}} \partial_\mu e^{i\xi(\lambda p) \hat{x}} = (i\lambda p_\mu) {{ \mathtb{I}}},\laueu{meyqplus1}$$ qhlch holds for any $\lambda\in\mathbb{R}$. Then, the coigimanion of $[\partial_\mu, \hat{x}_\nu] = [\pattlak_\iu,x^a\varphi_{a\nu}] = \varpkj_{\mh \nu}$ with the funchional qerivqtive of rith respect to $\lambda$ yields $$\lqbel{diff-xi}
\vagphi_{\nu\nu}(i\lambda p) \frac{b}{d\lambda} \lefc[ \xi^\nu(\kambds p
mathbb{R}/\mathcal{D})\simeq Hom(\pi_1(G)\to\mathbb{R}/\mathcal{D}).$$ Now assume $G=SL(2,\mathbb{R})$ and $\mathcal{D}=\mathbb{Z}$ $\mathbb{R}/\mathcal{D}\simeq The use Iwazawa decomposition yields with Y)=\pi_1(X)\times\pi_1(Y)$ for any spaces $X$ and implies $\pi_1(SL(2,\mathbb{R}))\simeq\mathbb{Z}$. Hence, $Hom(\mathbb{Z}\to U(1))\simeq U(1)$ classifies the inequivalent extensions of $SL(2,\mathbb{R})$ by $U(1)$. Accordingly, one expect that the of the present construction of $SL(2,\mathbb{R})$ gives rise to inequivalent classes of star-products.\ plane for =============================================== determination of which takes the generic form $$E_p(\hat{x})=\omega(p)e^{i\xi(p)\hat{x}} \label{generalform-ncexpo},$$ can be achieved through a standard albeit computation whose main steps are summarized now.\ First, $e^{i\xi(p)\hat{x}}\rhd 1 = \frac{e^{ipx}}{\omega(p)}$, easily infers that $$e^{-i\xi(\lambda p) \partial_\mu p) \hat{x}} (i\lambda {{ which holds for $\lambda\in\mathbb{R}$. Then, the combination of $[\partial_\mu, \hat{x}_\nu] = [\partial_\mu,x^a\varphi_{a\nu}] = \varphi_{\mu \nu}$ with the functional derivative of respect to $$\label{diff-xi} \varphi_{\mu\nu}(i\lambda \frac{d}{d\lambda} \xi^\nu(\lambda
mathbb{R}/\mathcal{D})\simeq Hom(\pi_1(g)\to\mathbb{R}/\MathcAl{D}).$$ now AsSume $g=SL(2,\mAthbb{R})$ and $\mathcAL{D}=\maThbb{Z}$ so that $\mathbb{R}/\mathCal{D}\sImEQ U(1)$. ThE UsE of IwAzawa deCOmPOSitIoN yIelDs $sl(2,\mAthbb{r})\siMeq \mathBb{R}^2\times \maThbB{S}^1$, Which combineD WiTh $\pi_1(X\times y)=\pi_1(x)\times\pi_1(Y)$ for Any TopoloGiCal SPaces $x$ anD $Y$ impLies $\pi_1(sl(2,\mathbB{R}))\simeq\maThBB{Z}$. HencE, $hom(\mathBB{z}\tO U(1))\siMeq U(1)$ which classifiES tHE inequivalent eXtensiOnS Of $sl(2,\MatHbb{r})$ by $U(1)$. AccordInGly, onE Expect tHAt THE ExtENsion of the preSent construCTioN of $SL(2,\mAtHbb{r})$ Gives rIse to InEQuiValent classEs of Star-produCts.\

QuaNTized plANe waves For $\matHbb{r}^3_\thEta$
===============================================

THE dEtErmInATioN Of WhiCH taKes the geNeRiC form $$e_p(\haT{X})=\OMEga(p)E^{i\xI(p)\haT{x}} \labEl{generalform-NceXpo},$$ cAN be AchieVed thRougH a StandArd albEit teDiOus computation wHose Main steps Are SuMmaRiZed noW.\
first, uSinG $e^{i\Xi(p)\hat{x}}\Rhd 1 = \frac{E^{Ipx}}{\OmEGA(P)}$, oNe easily infers that $$E^{-i\XI(\LaMbda p) \hat{X}} \partiAL_\mU e^{I\Xi(\lambda P) \hAt{x}} = (I\lamBDA p_\mu) {{ \mAthbB{i}}},\lAbel{megaPlus1}$$ whICh HoLds for aNy $\Lambda\In\MatHbb{r}$. Then, THe coMbinatIon of $[\parTial_\mU, \Hat{x}_\nu] = [\partial_\mU,X^a\varphi_{a\nu}] = \vaRPhI_{\MU \nU}$ With The Functional dErivATive Of wiTH rEspECt to $\lAmbda$ YiELdS $$\Label{diff-xi}
\varphi_{\mu\Nu}(I\lambdA p) \fraC{d}{d\lambda} \left[ \Xi^\nu(\lambda P
mathbb{R}/\mathcal{D})\sim eq Hom(\pi _1(G) \to \ma th bb{R }/\m athcal{D}).$$N ow a ssume $G=SL(2,\mathbb{ R})$an d  $\m a th cal{D }=\math b b{ Z } $ s oth at$\ m at hbb{R }/\ mathcal {D}\simeqU(1 )$ . The use of Iw azawa deco mpo sition yield s $ SL(2,\ ma thb b {R})\ sim eq \m athbb{ R }^2\ti mes \math bb { S}^1$, which c o m bi nedwith $\pi_1(X\tim e sY )=\pi_1(X)\tim es\pi_ 1( Y )$ f orany  topologic al  spac e s $X$ a n d$ Y $  im p lies $\pi_1(S L(2,\mathbb { R}) )\sime q\ mat h bb{Z}$ . Hen ce ,  $H om(\mathbb{ Z}\t o U(1))\s imeq U ( 1)$ whi c h class ifiesthe  in equi v al en t e xt e nsi o ns  of $SL (2,\math bb {R })$ b y $U ( 1 ) $ . Ac cor ding ly, o ne expect tha t t he e x ten sionof th e pr es ent c onstru ction  o f $SL(2,\mathbb {R}) $ gives r ise  t o i ne quiva l ent cl ass esof star -produc t s.\ 
Q u a nt ized plane waves f or $ \m athbb{R} ^3_\th e ta $= ======== == === ==== = = ===== ==== = == ======== ====== = 
Th e deter mi nation  o f w hic h tak e s th e gene ric form  $$E_ p (\hat{x})=\ome g a(p)e^{i\xi(p ) \h a t {x } } \l abe l{generalfo rm-n c expo },$$ ca n b e  achi evedth r ou g h a standard albeit  t edious  comp utation whose  main step s a re summa rize d  n o w.\
First, usi ng $e ^{i\xi(p)\ h at{x}}\r hd 1= \frac{ e^{ipx}}{ \ o mega(p)} $,one  ea sil y in fers that $$e ^ { -i\x i( \lambda  p)  \hat{x }}\pa rti al_ \m u e^{i\xi (\lambda  p )\h at {x} } = ( i \lambdap_ \mu ){{\math b b{I}}} ,\lab el{m eg ap l us1 }$$ whi c hh o ldsfo rany$\l am bda\i n\ma t hbb {R}$. T hen, thecom b inat io nof $[\p artial_\mu, \ ha t{x}_\nu]=[\p artial _ \ mu,x^a\v arphi_{a\nu}] = \varphi _ {\mu \n u}$  with  the  function alderiva tiv e  of wi th res pectto  $\ l a mbda$ y ie lds  $ $\label{di f f -xi }
\va rp hi_{ \mu\nu} (i\lambda p) \frac { d}{ d\lambda} \le ft[  \xi ^ \ nu (\l a mb d a p 
mathbb{R}/\mathcal{D})\simeq Hom(\pi_1(G)\to\mathbb{R}/\mathcal{D}).$$_Now assume_$G=SL(2,\mathbb{R})$ and $\mathcal{D}=\mathbb{Z}$ so_that $\mathbb{R}/\mathcal{D}\simeq_U(1)$._The use_of_Iwazawa decomposition yields_$SL(2,\mathbb{R})\simeq \mathbb{R}^2\times \mathbb{S}^1$,_which combined with $\pi_1(X\times_Y)=\pi_1(X)\times\pi_1(Y)$ for any_topological_spaces $X$ and $Y$ implies $\pi_1(SL(2,\mathbb{R}))\simeq\mathbb{Z}$. Hence, $Hom(\mathbb{Z}\to U(1))\simeq U(1)$ which classifies the inequivalent_extensions_of $SL(2,\mathbb{R})$_by_$U(1)$._Accordingly, one expect that the_extension of the present construction_of $SL(2,\mathbb{R})$_gives rise to inequivalent classes of star-products.\

Quantized plane_waves_for $\mathbb{R}^3_\theta$
===============================================

The determination_of which takes the generic form $$E_p(\hat{x})=\omega(p)e^{i\xi(p)\hat{x}} \label{generalform-ncexpo},$$ can_be achieved through a standard albeit_tedious computation whose_main_steps_are summarized now.\
First, using_$e^{i\xi(p)\hat{x}}\rhd 1 = \frac{e^{ipx}}{\omega(p)}$, one easily_infers that $$e^{-i\xi(\lambda p) \hat{x}} \partial_\mu_e^{i\xi(\lambda p) \hat{x}} = (i\lambda p_\mu) {{_\mathbb{I}}},\label{megaplus1}$$ which holds for any $\lambda\in\mathbb{R}$._Then, the combination of $[\partial_\mu,_\hat{x}_\nu] =_[\partial_\mu,x^a\varphi_{a\nu}] = \varphi_{\mu \nu}$ with_the functional derivative_of with_respect to $\lambda$_yields $$\label{diff-xi}
\varphi_{\mu\nu}(i\lambda p) \frac{d}{d\lambda} \left[ \xi^\nu(\lambda_p