_{\theta(\omega_1),\theta(\omega_2)}$. A ResNet consists of a series of blocks. One block is given in Figure \[fig:schematic\] with two linear transformations, two activation functions, and one short cut. Detailed description of ResNet is included in the Supporting Information. Parameters of the surface roughness ($\theta(\omega_{1})$,$\theta (\omega_{2})$) are fed as input, and the EDL $\sigma$ is extracted as the output function over the entire parameter space. Sigmoid function is chosen as the activation function here.

The loss function we use is the MSE between the actual EDL $\sigma_{\theta(\omega_1),\theta(\omega_2)}$ given by the diffusion equation model and the predicted EDL $\sigma(\theta(\omega_1)[j],\theta(\omega_2)[j])$ given by the ResNet $$\label{eqn:MSE}
  MSE= \frac{1}{M}\sum_{j=1}^{M} \left(\sigma_{\theta(\omega_1)[j],\theta(\omega_2)[j]}-\sigma(\theta(\omega_1)[j],\theta(\omega_2)[j])\right)^2,$$ where $\theta$ represents the parameter set in the ResNet, $j$ is the $j$-th sample, and M is the size of training data set.

Define the relative $L^{\infty}$ error of EDL as $$Error =  \max_{1\leq j\leq M} \dfrac{\left|\sigma_{\theta(\omega_1)[j],\theta(\omega_2)[j]}-\sigma(\theta(\omega_1)[j],\theta(\omega_2)[j])\right|} {\sigma_{\theta(\omega_1)[j],\theta(\omega_2)[j]}},$$ which will be used to quantify the approximation accuracy of DL.

Quasi-Monte Carlo Sampling
--------------------------

Compared to uniform sampling and Monte-Carlo sampling, quasi-Monte Carlo sampling provides the best compromise between accuracy and efficiency. It overcomes the curse of dimensionality and has high accuracy [@Russel1998]. For the simulations in our work, at least three orders of magnitude reduction in the size of data set is found for quasi-Monte Carlo sampling without loss of accuracy (see the Supporting Information).

Results and Discussion
======================

Accuracy check and training data set

_ { \theta(\omega_1),\theta(\omega_2)}$. A ResNet consists of a series of blocks. One block is give in Figure \[fig: schematic\ ] with two analogue transformations, two activation function, and one unretentive cut. Detailed description of ResNet is included in the Supporting Information. parameter of the airfoil roughness ($ \theta(\omega_{1})$,$\theta (\omega_{2})$) are prey as input, and the EDL $ \sigma$ is extracted as the output signal function over the entire argument space. Sigmoid function is chosen as the activation function here. 

 The loss function we practice is the MSE between the actual EDL $ \sigma_{\theta(\omega_1),\theta(\omega_2)}$ given by the diffusion equation mannequin and the predicted EDL $ \sigma(\theta(\omega_1)[j],\theta(\omega_2)[j])$ given by the ResNet $ $ \label{eqn: MSE } 
   MSE= \frac{1}{M}\sum_{j=1}^{M } \left(\sigma_{\theta(\omega_1)[j],\theta(\omega_2)[j]}-\sigma(\theta(\omega_1)[j],\theta(\omega_2)[j])\right)^2,$$ where $ \theta$ represent the parameter put in the ResNet, $ j$ is the $ j$-th sample, and M is the size of training data set. 

 Define the proportional $ L^{\infty}$ error of EDL as $ $ Error =   \max_{1\leq j\leq M } \dfrac{\left|\sigma_{\theta(\omega_1)[j],\theta(\omega_2)[j]}-\sigma(\theta(\omega_1)[j],\theta(\omega_2)[j])\right| } { \sigma_{\theta(\omega_1)[j],\theta(\omega_2)[j]}},$$ which will be used to quantify the approximation accuracy of DL. 

 Quasi - Monte Carlo Sampling 
 -------------------------- 

 Compared to uniform sampling and Monte - Carlo sample distribution, quasi - Monte Carlo sample distribution leave the best compromise between accuracy and efficiency. It overcomes the curse of dimensionality and has high accuracy [ @Russel1998 ]. For the simulations in our workplace, at least three order of magnitude reduction in the size of datum rig is find for quasi - Monte Carlo sampling without loss of accuracy (determine the Supporting Information). 

 Results and Discussion 
 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 

 Accuracy check and training data jell
_{\theha(\omega_1),\theta(\omega_2)}$. A ResNtt consists of a series mf blodks. One clock is given in Figure \[fig:dcyematuc\] with two linear travsformatilns, two qctitation functions, and one short gut. Dzteiled descriptipn of ResNat is included iv che Supporting Information. Parameterf of thr durface roughngss ($\tnqta(\ojvgc_{1})$,$\theta (\omega_{2})$) are fed as input, ahd the TDL $\sigma$ is extravted as the output functioj ovfr the entire paraleter space. Sigiiid function is chosen as the actibation function here.

The loss fuvctiou we use is tye LVE between vhe acnual EDL $\sigma_{\theta(\omaga_1),\thets(\omega_2)}$ given bn the didfusion equation moden and the predicteq EDL $\sigka(\cheta(\omega_1)[j],\theta(\omega_2)[h])$ tiven by dhe FwsNdt $$\mauel{sqn:MSE}
  MAE= \frac{1}{M}\suj_{j=1}^{M} \left(\signa_{\theta(\omega_1)[j],\theta(\okedq_2)[j]}-\sigma(\theta(\ojega_1)[j],\treea(\omega_2)[j])\right)^2,$$ where $\theta$ represents tht parzmeter set in the ResNer, $j$ is the $j$-th sample, and M is the size of training data set.

Define the relative $L^{\infvy}$ erxir of WDP as $$Error =  \max_{1\leq j\leq M} \dfrac{\left|\sigma_{\thetw(\kmtga_1)[m],\theta(\omega_2)[j]}-\sigmc(\theta(\omega_1)[j],\thets(\olebw_2)[j])\right|} {\sigma_{\jheta(\omzfa_1)[n],\theta(\omega_2)[j]}},$$ which will bg used to quantyfy yhe approximation accuracy if DL.

Quasi-Moute Carlo Sampling
--------------------------

Com'ared to uniyorm ssmplimg and Monte-Carlo samplnng, quzsi-Monte Caglo sampljvg provides the cesn cokpromise between accuracy wnd efficmency. It ovefcomgs the surse of dlmenslmnality and has hihh aceuracf [@Russel1998]. Flr the simulations in our work, ev least three osdegs of maguitude reduction in the size of dcta set ns fouvd for quaai-Monte Carlo sampjing without nlss of accurecy (see tre Syppoeting Ivwormation).

Resulys and Discussion
======================

Acxuracy check and tvainivf data set

_{\theta(\omega_1),\theta(\omega_2)}$. A ResNet consists of a series One is given Figure \[fig:schematic\] with functions, one short cut. description of ResNet included in the Supporting Information. Parameters the surface roughness ($\theta(\omega_{1})$,$\theta (\omega_{2})$) are fed as input, and the EDL $\sigma$ extracted as the output function over the entire parameter space. Sigmoid function is as activation here. loss function we use is the MSE between the actual EDL $\sigma_{\theta(\omega_1),\theta(\omega_2)}$ given by the diffusion model and the predicted EDL $\sigma(\theta(\omega_1)[j],\theta(\omega_2)[j])$ given by ResNet $$\label{eqn:MSE} MSE= \frac{1}{M}\sum_{j=1}^{M} where $\theta$ represents the parameter in ResNet, $j$ the sample, M is the of training data set. Define the relative $L^{\infty}$ error of EDL as $$Error = \max_{1\leq j\leq M} {\sigma_{\theta(\omega_1)[j],\theta(\omega_2)[j]}},$$ which used to the accuracy DL. Quasi-Monte Carlo Compared to uniform sampling and Monte-Carlo sampling provides the best compromise between accuracy and It overcomes curse of dimensionality and has high [@Russel1998]. For the simulations in our work, at three orders of magnitude reduction in the size of data set is found for quasi-Monte without loss of accuracy the Supporting Information). and ====================== check training data
_{\theta(\omega_1),\theta(\omega_2)}$. A ResNEt consists Of a seRieS of BlOcks. one bLock is given in FIGure \[Fig:schematic\] with two linEar trAnSFormATiOns, twO activaTIoN FUncTiOnS, anD oNE sHort cUt. DEtailed DescriptioN of reSNet is includED iN the SupporTinG Information. parAmeterS oF thE SurfaCe rOughnEss ($\theTA(\omega_{1})$,$\Theta (\omegA_{2})$) aRE fed as INput, and THE EdL $\siGma$ is extracted as tHE oUTput function ovEr the eNtIRe PARamEteR space. SigmOiD funcTIon is chOSeN AS The ACtivation funcTion here.

The LOss FunctiOn We uSE is the mSE beTwEEn tHe actual EDL $\SigmA_{\theta(\omeGa_1),\thetA(\Omega_2)}$ giVEn by the DiffusIon EquAtioN MoDeL anD tHE prEDiCteD eDL $\Sigma(\theTa(\OmEga_1)[j],\tHeta(\OMEGA_2)[j])$ giVen By thE ResNEt $$\label{eqn:MSE}
  mSE= \Frac{1}{m}\Sum_{J=1}^{M} \lefT(\sigmA_{\theTa(\Omega_1)[J],\theta(\Omega_2)[J]}-\sIgma(\theta(\omega_1)[j],\ThetA(\omega_2)[j])\riGht)^2,$$ WhEre $\ThEta$ rePResentS thE paRameter Set in thE resneT, $J$ IS tHe $j$-th sample, and M is tHe SIZe Of trainiNg data SEt.

deFIne the reLaTivE $L^{\inFTY}$ erroR of Edl aS $$Error =  \maX_{1\leq j\lEQ M} \DfRac{\left|\SiGma_{\theTa(\OmeGa_1)[j],\Theta(\OMega_2)[J]}-\sigma(\Theta(\omeGa_1)[j],\thETa(\omega_2)[j])\right|} {\sIGma_{\theta(\omega_1)[J],\ThETA(\oMEga_2)[j]}},$$ WhiCh will be useD to qUAntiFy thE ApProXImatiOn accUrACy OF DL.

Quasi-Monte Carlo SAmPling
--------------------------

COmparEd to uniform saMpling and MONTE-Carlo saMpliNG, qUAsi-Monte Carlo sAmpliNg provides THe best coMpromIse betweEn accuracY ANd efficiEncY. It OveRcoMES tHe curse of dimeNSIonaLiTy and haS hiGh accurAcy [@rusSel1998]. for ThE simulatiOns in our WoRk, At LeAst Three ORders of mAgNitUdE reDuctiON in the Size oF datA sEt IS foUnd for qUAsI-mOnte caRlO samPliNg WithoUt loSS of AccuracY (see the SuPpoRTing inFoRmation).

results and DisCuSsion
======================

AccurAcY chEck and TRAining daTa set

_{\theta(\omega_1),\theta( \omega_2)} $. ARes Net  c onsi stsof a series of bloc ks. One block is given  in F ig u re \ [ fi g:sch ematic\ ]  w i t h t wo  l ine ar tr ansfo rma tions,two activa tio nfunctions, a n done shortcut . Detailed d esc riptio nofR esNet  is  incl uded i n  the S upporting  I n format i on. Par a m et ersof the surface ro u gh n ess ($\theta(\ omega_ {1 } )$ , $ \th eta  (\omega_{ 2} )$) a r e fed a s  i n p u t,a nd the EDL $\ sigma$ is e x tra cted a sthe output  func ti o n o ver the ent ireparameter  space .  Sigmoi d  functi on ischo sen  ast he  a cti va t ion fu nct i onhere.

T he  l oss f unct i o n we u seis t he MS E between the  ac tual EDL  $\si gma_{ \the ta (\ome ga_1), \thet a( \omega_2)}$ giv en b y the dif fus io n e qu ation modeland  th e predi cted ED L  $\ si g m a (\ theta(\omega_1)[j] ,\ t h et a(\omega _2)[j] ) $gi v en by th eRes Net$ $ \labe l{eq n :M SE}
  MS E= \fr a c{ 1} {M}\sum _{ j=1}^{ M}  \l eft (\sig m a_{\ theta( \omega_1 )[j], \ theta(\omega_2 ) [j]}-\sigma(\ t he t a (\ o mega _1) [j],\theta( \ome g a_2) [j]) \ ri ght ) ^2,$$  wher e$ \t h eta$ represents the  p aramet er se t in the ResN et, $j$ is t h e $j$-th  sam p le ,  and M is thesizeof trainin g  data se t.

D efine th e relativ e $L^{\inf ty} $ e rro r o f ED L as $$Error=  \ma x_ {1\leqj\l eq M} \ dfr ac{ \le ft| \s igma_{\th eta(\ome ga _1 )[ j] ,\t heta( \ omega_2) [j ]}- \s igm a(\th e ta(\om ega_1 )[j] ,\ th e ta( \omega_ 2 )[ j ] )\ri gh t| } {\ sig ma _{\th eta( \ ome ga_1)[j ],\theta( \om e ga_2 )[ j] }},$$ w hich will beus ed to quan ti fythe ap p r oximatio n accuracy of DL.

Quas i -MonteCar lo Sa mpli ng
------ --- ------ --- - ------ -

Com pared  t o u n i forms a mp lin gand Monte- C a rlo  samp li ng,quasi-M onte Carlo samplin g  pr ovides the be stcomp r o mi seb et w een  a c cur a c y and efficienc y. It over co m es  the curse ofdi mension ality a nd ha s  high a ccuracy [ @Russel19 98 ]. F o r  th e simulati ons in o ur work,a t lea s tthree  or ders o fmag nitud e redu c tio n inthe si ze  of da ta se tis found  for quasi-Monte Carlosampli ng wi tho ut loss o f a c cur acy (seetheSupporting  In for matio n). 
Resu ltsa nd  Di s cussi on
= = ========= = == === = = == =

Accuracy c h eck  andtra i ning d ataset

_{\theta(\omega_1),\theta(\omega_2)}$. A_ResNet consists_of a series of_blocks. One_block_is given_in_Figure \[fig:schematic\] with_two linear transformations,_two activation functions, and_one short cut._Detailed_description of ResNet is included in the Supporting Information. Parameters of the surface roughness_($\theta(\omega_{1})$,$\theta_(\omega_{2})$) are_fed_as_input, and the EDL $\sigma$_is extracted as the output_function over_the entire parameter space. Sigmoid function is chosen_as_the activation function_here.

The loss function we use is the MSE between_the actual EDL $\sigma_{\theta(\omega_1),\theta(\omega_2)}$ given by_the diffusion equation_model_and_the predicted EDL $\sigma(\theta(\omega_1)[j],\theta(\omega_2)[j])$_given by the ResNet $$\label{eqn:MSE}
 _MSE= \frac{1}{M}\sum_{j=1}^{M} \left(\sigma_{\theta(\omega_1)[j],\theta(\omega_2)[j]}-\sigma(\theta(\omega_1)[j],\theta(\omega_2)[j])\right)^2,$$ where $\theta$ represents_the parameter set in the ResNet, $j$_is the $j$-th sample, and M_is the size of training_data set.

Define_the relative $L^{\infty}$ error of_EDL as $$Error_= _\max_{1\leq j\leq M}_\dfrac{\left|\sigma_{\theta(\omega_1)[j],\theta(\omega_2)[j]}-\sigma(\theta(\omega_1)[j],\theta(\omega_2)[j])\right|} {\sigma_{\theta(\omega_1)[j],\theta(\omega_2)[j]}},$$ which will be used_to quantify the_approximation accuracy of DL.

Quasi-Monte Carlo Sampling
--------------------------

Compared_to_uniform sampling and_Monte-Carlo_sampling,_quasi-Monte Carlo_sampling provides the_best_compromise between_accuracy_and efficiency. It overcomes the curse_of_dimensionality and has high accuracy [@Russel1998]. For_the simulations in our_work,_at least three orders_of magnitude reduction in the_size of data set is found_for quasi-Monte_Carlo sampling_without loss of accuracy (see the Supporting Information).

Results and Discussion
======================

Accuracy check_and training data set
