, EoS = BsK20}.

We have estimated the spin-dependent capture cross section shown in Figure \[fig:DD\] by

1.  Scaling the spin-independent capture cross section by a factor of $$\left[\frac{4}{3}\frac{J_n+1}{J_n} (\langle S_n\rangle + \langle S_p\rangle)^2\right]^{-1}~,$$ where $J_n = 1/2$, $\langle S_n\rangle = 1/2$ and $\langle S_p\rangle = 0$ for scattering on neutrons, and\

2.  To calculate pasta scattering we have used the pasta structure factor in Eq.  but have imposed $S_{\rm pasta} (q) \leq 1$, since we expect spin-dependent scattering to not be coherent over pasta nucleons, and

3.  To calculate quasi-elastic scattering on nucleons in the inner and outer crust, we follow the same procedure as spin-independent scattering, since in this case scattering occurs with individual nucleons.

Although the PICO-60 limit applies to spin-dependent scattering on protons, we display it as it provides the current best sensitivity to spin-dependent dark matter interactions with nucleons at low dark matter masses. Furthermore, most spin-dependent models predict roughly equal rates of neutron and proton scattering.

For spin-independent scattering, we see that neutron crust heating is clearly more sensitive than direct detection for low dark matter masses (${m_{\rm DM}}\lesssim$ GeV); crustal capture easily proceeds for these masses (see Eq. ), but at terrestrial experiments it is difficult to detect soft nuclear recoils above energy thresholds. Direct detection experiments benefit from an $A^2$ enhancement in cross section from nuclear coherence, which helps them surpass neutron star crust sensitivity in some range of ${m_{\rm DM}}$. For spin-dependent scattering, we see that neutron crust heating is more sensitive than current direct detection searches for nearly all dark matter masses. We note that these statements hold true for sub-MeV dark matter masses as well, where neutron star crust heating occurs through phonon excitations (see Fig. \[fig:bounds1\]). For complementary bounds on dark matter-nucleon scattering at low dark matter masses, see References [@Erickcek:2007jv; @Gluscevic:2017ywp; @Xu:2018efh; @Capp
, EoS = BsK20 }. 

 We have estimated the spin - dependent capture cross incision usher in Figure \[fig: DD\ ] by 

 1.   Scaling the spin - independent capture hybrid section by a factor of $ $ \left[\frac{4}{3}\frac{J_n+1}{J_n } (\langle S_n\rangle + \langle S_p\rangle)^2\right]^{-1}~,$$ where $ J_n = 1/2 $, $ \langle S_n\rangle = 1/2 $ and $ \langle S_p\rangle = 0 $ for scatter on neutron, and\ 

 2.   To calculate pasta scattering we have used the pasta structure factor in Eq.    but have levy $ S_{\rm pasta } (q) \leq 1 $, since we expect spin - pendent scattering to not be coherent over pasta nucleons, and 

 3.   To calculate quasi - elastic scattering on nucleons in the inside and outer crust, we follow the same routine as spin - independent dispersion, since in this case disperse occurs with individual nucleons. 

 Although the PICO-60 limit applies to spin - pendent scattering on protons, we display it as it provides the current best sensitivity to spin - dependent dark matter interactions with nucleons at low dark matter masses. Furthermore, most spin - dependent model predict roughly adequate pace of neutron and proton scatter. 

 For spin - independent dispersion, we see that neutron crust heating is clearly more sensitive than lineal detection for low dark matter masses ($ { m_{\rm DM}}\lesssim$ GeV); crustal capture easily proceeds for these masses (see Eq.  ), but at terrestrial experiments it is difficult to detect cushy nuclear recoils above department of energy threshold. Direct detection experiments benefit from an $ A^2 $ enhancement in cross section from nuclear coherence, which helps them exceed neutron star crust sensitivity in some range of $ { m_{\rm DM}}$. For spin - dependent scattering, we experience that neutron crust heating is more sensible than current direct detection searches for nearly all dark topic masses. We note that these statements hold on-key for sub - MeV dark matter masses as well, where neutron star crust heating happen through phonon excitations (go steady Fig.   \[fig: bounds1\ ]). For complementary bounds on dark matter - nucleon scattering at abject dark matter multitude, see References   [ @Erickcek:2007jv; @Gluscevic:2017ywp; @Xu:2018efh; @Capp
, EoD = BsK20}.

We have estimated uhe spin-dependent capturx cross section shown in Figure \[fig:DD\] by

1.  Sralibg tht spin-independent cxpture crlss sectuon uy a factor of $$\lxrt[\frac{4}{3}\fvcc{J_n+1}{J_h} (\lanylx S_n\rangle + \lannle S_p\rangla)^2\right]^{-1}~,$$ where $J_t = 1/2$, $\pangle S_n\rangle = 1/2$ and $\langle S_p\rangje = 0$ fot dcattering on geutgogs, ahd\

2.  To calculate pasta scattering se have used the pasya structure factor in Eq.  hut jave imposed $S_{\rm pwsta} (q) \leq 1$, sinsw we expect rpin-dependtnc scatterinf to not be coherent over pasta nuclzons, and

3.  Ti xalfolate quasi-eoastib scattering on nuclemns in yhe inner and putxr ceust, we follow the sake procedure as spyn-indepengeut scattering, since ib rhis wase scagrerkng orcuds witj iidividual nhcleons.

Althiugh the PICO-60 limit a[ikies to spin-sependqne scattering on protons, we display it av if provides the current vest sensitivity to skin-dependegt dark matter interactions with nucleons at low gark jxtttr massdw. Vurthermore, most spin-dependent models predict doigmly equal rates jf neutron snf ltoton scatterivg.

For spih-independent scattfring, wg see rhat neutwon vrust heating is clearly moee sensitive rhan direct detectnon for low bark mstter masses (${m_{\rm DM}}\lesssim$ GzV); cruatal capturf easily lfoceeds for thesd mssves (see Td. ), but at terrestryal expermmentx it is difgicult to detect soft nuclear recoils ablve euergy thresholdd. Direct detection experiments uxnefit from am $D^2$ ethancemeut in gross section fwom nuclear cokerence, chich felps them surpasv neutron sear crust senvltivity in smme rangq of ${m_{\rm DM}}$. For rpin-dependent xcatteriny, we wee that neutron cvust fsating is more wenwitive than curteng dyrvct dqdection searwhes fof nearuy all dark oattrr masses. We note thdt tgese statements hokd true fot sub-MeV qark matter mssses as well, whert neutcon ster cruxt reating occurs through phonon sxcitatiojs (fee Fig. \[fig:botnds1\]). For complemzntary bounds on dark matter-nucleon scatvering at low dark matjer masses, see Refereucts [@Erickcek:2007jv; @Jluscedic:2017ywp; @Xu:2018afh; @Capp
, EoS = BsK20}. We have estimated capture section shown Figure \[fig:DD\] by cross by a factor $$\left[\frac{4}{3}\frac{J_n+1}{J_n} (\langle S_n\rangle \langle S_p\rangle)^2\right]^{-1}~,$$ where $J_n = 1/2$, S_n\rangle = 1/2$ and $\langle S_p\rangle = 0$ for scattering on neutrons, and\ To calculate pasta scattering we have used the pasta structure factor in Eq. have $S_{\rm (q) 1$, since we expect spin-dependent scattering to not be coherent over pasta nucleons, and 3. To quasi-elastic scattering on nucleons in the inner and crust, we follow the procedure as spin-independent scattering, since this scattering occurs individual Although PICO-60 limit applies spin-dependent scattering on protons, we display it as it provides the current best sensitivity to spin-dependent dark interactions with low dark masses. most models predict roughly of neutron and proton scattering. For see that neutron crust heating is clearly more than direct for low dark matter masses (${m_{\rm GeV); crustal capture easily proceeds for these masses Eq. ), but at terrestrial experiments it is difficult to detect soft nuclear recoils above Direct detection experiments benefit an $A^2$ enhancement cross from coherence, helps them neutron star crust sensitivity in some range of ${m_{\rm DM}}$. For scattering, we see that neutron crust heating is more sensitive direct searches for nearly dark matter masses. We that statements hold true for matter as star heating through phonon excitations (see \[fig:bounds1\]). For complementary bounds on matter-nucleon scattering at low [@Erickcek:2007jv; @Gluscevic:2017ywp; @Xu:2018efh; @Capp
, EoS = BsK20}.

We have estimated the sPin-dependeNt capTurE crOsS secTion Shown in Figure \[fIG:DD\] bY

1.  Scaling the spin-indepenDent cApTUre cROsS sectIon by a fACtOR Of $$\lEfT[\fRac{4}{3}\FrAC{J_N+1}{J_n} (\laNglE S_n\rangLe + \langle S_p\RanGlE)^2\right]^{-1}~,$$ where $J_N = 1/2$, $\LaNgle S_n\rangLe = 1/2$ aNd $\langle S_p\raNglE = 0$ for scAtTerINg on nEutRons, aNd\

2.  To caLCulate Pasta scatTeRIng we hAVe used tHE PaSta sTructure factor in EQ.  BuT Have imposed $S_{\rm Pasta} (q) \LeQ 1$, SiNCE we ExpEct spin-depEnDent sCAtterinG To NOT Be cOHerent over pasTa nucleons, aND

3.  To CalculAtE quASi-elasTic scAtTEriNg on nucleonS in tHe inner anD outer CRust, we fOLlow the Same prOceDurE as sPIn-InDepEnDEnt SCaTteRIng, Since in tHiS cAse scAtteRING OccuRs wIth iNdiviDual nucleons.

ALthOugh THe PiCO-60 liMit apPlieS tO spin-DependEnt scAtTering on protons, We diSplay it as It pRoVidEs The cuRRent beSt sEnsItivity To spin-dEPenDeNT DArK matter interactionS wITH nUcleons aT low daRK mAtTEr masses. fuRthErmoRE, Most sPin-dEPeNdent modEls preDIcT rOughly eQuAl rateS oF neUtrOn and PRotoN scattEring.

For Spin-iNDependent scattERing, we see that NEuTROn CRust HeaTing is clearLy moRE senSitiVE tHan DIrect DetecTiON fOR low dark matter masseS (${m_{\Rm DM}}\leSssim$ geV); crustal capTure easily PROCeeds for ThesE MaSSes (see Eq. ), but at tErresTrial experIMents it iS diffIcult to dEtect soft NUClear recOilS abOve EneRGY tHresholds. DireCT DeteCtIon expeRimEnts benEfiT frOm aN $A^2$ eNhAncement iN cross seCtIoN fRoM nuClear COherence, WhIch HeLps Them sURpass nEutroN staR cRuST seNsitiviTY iN SOme rAnGe Of ${m_{\rM DM}}$. foR spin-DepeNDenT scatteRing, we see ThaT NeutRoN cRust heaTing is more senSiTive than cuRrEnt Direct DETection sEarches for nearly all dark MAtter maSseS. We noTe thAt these stAteMents hOld TRue for Sub-MeV Dark mAtTer MASses aS WElL, whErE neutron stAR CruSt heaTiNg ocCurs thrOugh phonon excitatiONs (sEe Fig. \[fig:boundS1\]). FoR comPLEmEntARy BOunDs ON daRK Matter-nucleon scAttering at LoW DaRk matter maSSes, SeE RefereNces [@EriCkcek:2007JV; @GlusceVic:2017ywp; @Xu:2018eFh; @Capp
, EoS = BsK20}.

We have e stimated t he sp in- dep en dent  cap ture cross sec t ionshown in Figure \[fig: DD\]by 
1.Sc aling  the sp i n- i n dep en de ntca p tu re cr oss  sectio n by a fac tor  o f $$\left[\f r ac {4}{3}\fra c{J _n+1}{J_n} ( \la ngle S _n \ra n gle +  \l angle  S_p\r a ngle)^ 2\right]^ {- 1 }~,$$w here $J _ n  =  1/2 $, $\langle S_n\r a ng l e = 1/2$ and $ \langl eS _p \ r ang le= 0$ for s ca tteri n g on ne u tr o n s , a n d\

2.  To ca lculate pas t a s catter in g w e  haveusedth e  pa sta structu re f actor inEq.  b u t havei mposed$S_{\r m p ast a} ( q )\l eq1$ ,  si n ce  we exp ect spin -d ep enden t sc a t t e ring  to  not  be c oherent overpas ta n u cle ons,and
3. To  calc ulatequasi -e lastic scatteri ng o n nucleon s i nthe  i nnera nd out ercru st, wefollowt hesa m e pr ocedure as spin-in de p e nd ent scat tering ,  s in c e in thi scas e sc a t terin g oc c ur s with i ndivid u al  n ucleons .
Altho ug h t hePICO- 6 0 li mit ap plies to  spin - dependent scat t ering on prot o ns , we disp lay  it as it p rovi d es t he c u rr ent bestsensi ti v it y  to spin-dependentda rk mat ter i nteractions w ith nucleo n s at low d arkm at t er masses. Fur therm ore, mosts pin-depe ndent  modelspredict r o u ghly equ alrat esofn e ut ron and proto n scat te ring.
For  spin-i nde pen den t s ca ttering,we see t ha tne ut ron  crus t  heating  i s c le arl y mor e  sensi tivethan  d ir e ctdetecti o nf o r lo wda rk m att er  mass es ( $ {m_ {\rm DM }}\lesssi m$G eV);  c ru stal ca pture easilypr oceeds for  t hes e mass e s  (see Eq . ), but at terrestrial experim ent s itis d ifficulttodetect  so f t nucl ear re coils  a bov e energ y th res ho lds. Direc t det ectio nexpe riments  benefit from an $ A ^2$  enhancementincros s se cti o nf rom  n u cle a r  coherence, whi ch helps t he m  s urpass neu t ron  s tar cru st sens itivi t y in so me rangeof ${m_{\ rm  DM} } $ . F or spin-de pendentscatterin g , wes ee  that  ne utroncr ust  heat ing is mor e sen sitive  t han cu rrent  d irect de tection searches for ne arly a ll da rkmatter ma sse s . W e note th at t hese state men tsholdtru e  forsub- M eV  da r k mat term asses asw el l,w h er e neutron s t a r  cr ust h eat i ng occ ursthrough phonon ex c itations (seeFig. \ [fi g:b o unds 1\ ]). For comple men ta r y  boundson  dark matte r-nucleo ns catte ring a t lowdark ma t t er masses , se e R eferences  [@ Er i ckcek:2 00 7j v ; @Glu scev ic :2017y wp; @X u :201 8 e fh; @Capp
, EoS_= BsK20}.

We_have estimated the spin-dependent_capture cross_section_shown in_Figure_\[fig:DD\] by

1. _Scaling the spin-independent_capture cross section by_a factor of_$$\left[\frac{4}{3}\frac{J_n+1}{J_n}_(\langle S_n\rangle + \langle S_p\rangle)^2\right]^{-1}~,$$ where $J_n = 1/2$, $\langle S_n\rangle = 1/2$ and_$\langle_S_p\rangle =_0$_for_scattering on neutrons, and\

2. _To calculate pasta scattering we_have used_the pasta structure factor in Eq.  but have_imposed_$S_{\rm pasta} (q)_\leq 1$, since we expect spin-dependent scattering to not_be coherent over pasta nucleons, and

3._ To calculate_quasi-elastic_scattering_on nucleons in the_inner and outer crust, we follow_the same procedure as spin-independent scattering,_since in this case scattering occurs with_individual nucleons.

Although the PICO-60 limit applies_to spin-dependent scattering on protons,_we display_it as it provides the_current best sensitivity_to spin-dependent_dark matter interactions_with nucleons at low dark matter_masses. Furthermore, most_spin-dependent models predict roughly equal rates_of_neutron and proton_scattering.

For_spin-independent_scattering, we_see that neutron_crust_heating is_clearly_more sensitive than direct detection for_low_dark matter masses (${m_{\rm DM}}\lesssim$ GeV); crustal_capture easily proceeds for_these_masses (see Eq. ), but_at terrestrial experiments it is_difficult to detect soft nuclear recoils_above energy_thresholds. Direct_detection experiments benefit from an $A^2$ enhancement in cross section from_nuclear coherence, which helps them surpass_neutron star crust sensitivity_in some_range_of ${m_{\rm DM}}$._For_spin-dependent scattering,_we see that neutron crust heating is_more sensitive_than current direct detection searches for_nearly all dark matter_masses._We note that these statements hold_true for sub-MeV dark matter masses_as well, where neutron star_crust_heating_occurs through phonon excitations (see_Fig. \[fig:bounds1\]). For complementary bounds on dark_matter-nucleon scattering at_low dark matter masses, see References [@Erickcek:2007jv; @Gluscevic:2017ywp;_@Xu:2018efh;_@Capp