)$, the commutation relation equal to the corresponding commutator of position and momentum, that is, $[A,C]= i\hbar $. Physically, we are looking for an observable that could act as a *generator of correlations*. One can prove that such an operator $A(X,P)$ can not be expanded in a power series $\sum a_{kr} X^{k}P^{r}$ (notice that any power series can be brought to this “normal order” with all powers of $X$ at the left of all powers of $P$). In order to prove this we use the commutation relations in Eq.(\[ComRel3\]) and we can see that there exists no choice of the coefficients $a_{kr}$ that satisfy the commutation relation $[A,C]=i\hbar$.

The eigenvectors of $A(X,P)$ (if they exist) and $C(X,P)$ would build two mutually unbiased bases and these two observables could be chosen as a pair of canonical conjugate coordinates for the description of the system. This choice is related to the canonical transformation of classical mechanics where the coordinates $(x,p)$ are transformed to $a(x,p)$ and $c(x,p)$ in a way to preserve the Poisson brackets, that is $\{x,p\}=\{a,c\}=1$. If we take $c(x,p)=xp$, then the conjugate coordinate is $a(x,p)=\frac{1}{2}
\ln(\frac{x}{p})$. Following this suggestion we can see that the operator $$\label{AcanconjtoC}
 A=\frac{1}{2}(\ln X - \ln P)\,$$ at least *formally*, has the wanted commutation relation. To prove this we use Eqs.(\[commutPderivX\]) and (\[commutXderivP\]) in order to obtain $[\ln X,P]=i\hbar/X$ and $[\ln P,X]=-i\hbar/P$. With more mathematical rigour it is not clear that such an operator exists. Furthermore, the physical meaning of an observable such as $\ln X$, undefined for negative values of position, is unclear, leaving alone what would be the mysterious physical procedure to measure $A$. The question of the existence of a generator of correlations is open.

We come now to the question of the existence of the eigenvectors of the correlation operator $C$, that is, to determine the
) $, the commutation relation equal to the corresponding commutator of placement and momentum, that is, $ [ deoxyadenosine monophosphate, C]= i\hbar $. Physically, we are looking for an observable that could act as a * generator of correlation coefficient *. One can prove that such an operator $ A(X, P)$ cannot be boom in a might series $ \sum a_{kr } X^{k}P^{r}$ (detect that any power series can be bring to this “ normal order ” with all powers of $ X$ at the left of all powers of $ P$). In order to prove this we practice the commutation relations in Eq.(\[ComRel3\ ]) and we can see that there exist no choice of the coefficients $ a_{kr}$ that meet the commutation relative $ [ A, C]=i\hbar$. 

 The eigenvectors of $ A(X, P)$ (if they exist) and $ C(X, P)$ would build up two mutually unbiased bases and these two observables could be chosen as a couple of canonical conjugate coordinates for the description of the system. This choice is related to the canonical transformation of classical mechanics where the coordinates $ (x, p)$ are transformed to $ a(x, p)$ and $ c(x, p)$ in a way to preserve the Poisson brackets, that is $ \{x, p\}=\{a, c\}=1$. If we take $ c(x, p)=xp$, then the conjugate coordinate is $ a(x, p)=\frac{1}{2 } 
 \ln(\frac{x}{p})$. Following this trace we can see that the operator $ $ \label{AcanconjtoC } 
  A=\frac{1}{2}(\ln X - \ln P)\,$$ at least * formally *, have the want commutation relation. To prove this we use Eqs.(\[commutPderivX\ ]) and (\[commutXderivP\ ]) in order to obtain $ [ \ln X, P]=i\hbar / X$ and $ [ \ln P, X]=-i\hbar / P$. With more mathematical severity it is not clear that such an operator exists. Furthermore, the physical meaning of an observable such as $ \ln X$, undefined for negative value of position, is unclear, leaving alone what would be the cryptic physical routine to quantify $ A$. The doubt of the existence of a generator of correlations is open. 

 We derive now to the question of the existence of the eigenvectors of the correlation coefficient operator $ C$, that is, to decide the
)$, thf commutation relation edual to the cortewpondiig commhtator ow position and momentum, that iw, $[A,C]= u\hbar $. Physically, we afe lookinh for an obstrvable that coulv act as a *gensvator if correlationx*. One can [rove that sucv xn operator $A(X,P)$ can not be expanded ig a powrr series $\sum a_{kt} X^{k}P^{g}$ (gotidv uhat any power series can be broufht to uhis “normal order” eith all powers of $X$ at thf levt of all powers ov $P$). In ordet to prove this wd use the bmmmutation relations in Eq.(\[ComRel3\]) and we cxn sez that therg sxlvts no choire of nhe coefficiekns $a_{kr}$ dhat sayisfy the commmtatimn eelation $[A,C]=i\hbar$.

The emgenvectors of $A(X,P)$ (is they exhsc) and $C(X,P)$ would build tqo mujuallf uncuasdd gaxea and hheae two obssrvables coyld be chosen as a kaiw of canonical conjudaee coordinates for the description of tve aystem. This choice is rwlated to the canonicwl transfjrmation of classical mechanics where the coordindtes $(e,p)$ art bvanswirled to $a(x,p)$ and $c(x,p)$ in a way to preserve the Pjjsxok brackets, that ls $\{x,p\}=\{a,c\}=1$. If we take $c(d,p)=ck$, then the congugate cokrdinate is $a(x,p)=\fraf{1}{2}
\ln(\frac{v}{p})$. Foolowing tris xuggestion we can see that rhe operator $$\oabel{AcanconjtoC}
 A=\yrac{1}{2}(\ln X - \ln P)\,$$ aj leasy *formally*, has the wantzd comjutation repation. To orove this we usd Eas.(\[wommutPdtfivX\]) and (\[commutXdqrivP\]) in irdex to obtxin $[\kn X,P]=i\rbar/X$ and $[\pn P,X]=-l\vbar/P$. With more mahhemajical sigour it ls not clear that such an operavpr exists. Futtharmmre, the 'hysicsl meaning of an observable such af $\ln B$, undefines for nxgative valuqs of positiot, is unclear, neaving wlonw whqt woula be the mysteroous physpccl procedyre to measure $A$. Tme qugsfion of the exiwtebce of a generayor of clrcelatymns is open.

Wa cooe vpw to the qutftlon of yhe existence of the eigsnvectors of the cprvelation iperator $C$, that is, to determine the
)$, the commutation relation equal to the of and momentum, is, $[A,C]= i\hbar for observable that could as a *generator correlations*. One can prove that such operator $A(X,P)$ can not be expanded in a power series $\sum a_{kr} X^{k}P^{r}$ that any power series can be brought to this “normal order” with all of at left all powers of $P$). In order to prove this we use the commutation relations in Eq.(\[ComRel3\]) we can see that there exists no choice the coefficients $a_{kr}$ that the commutation relation $[A,C]=i\hbar$. The of (if they and would two mutually unbiased and these two observables could be chosen as a pair of canonical conjugate coordinates for the description the system. is related the transformation classical mechanics where $(x,p)$ are transformed to $a(x,p)$ and way to preserve the Poisson brackets, that is If we $c(x,p)=xp$, then the conjugate coordinate is \ln(\frac{x}{p})$. Following this suggestion we can see that operator $$\label{AcanconjtoC} A=\frac{1}{2}(\ln X - \ln P)\,$$ at least *formally*, has the wanted commutation relation. this we use Eqs.(\[commutPderivX\]) (\[commutXderivP\]) in order obtain X,P]=i\hbar/X$ $[\ln With more rigour it is not clear that such an operator exists. Furthermore, physical meaning of an observable such as $\ln X$, undefined values position, is unclear, alone what would be mysterious procedure to measure $A$. of existence of is We come now to question of the existence of eigenvectors of the correlation determine the
)$, the commutation relation equAl to the corRespoNdiNg cOmMutaTor oF position and moMEntuM, that is, $[A,C]= i\hbar $. PhysicalLy, we aRe LOokiNG fOr an oBservabLE tHAT coUlD aCt aS a *GEnEratoR of CorrelaTions*. One caN prOvE that such an oPErAtor $A(X,P)$ can Not Be expanded in A poWer serIeS $\suM A_{kr} X^{k}p^{r}$ (nOtice That anY Power sEries can bE bROught tO This “norMAL oRder” With all powers of $X$ aT ThE Left of all powerS of $P$). In OrDEr TO ProVe tHis we use thE cOmmutATion relATiONS In EQ.(\[comRel3\]) and we caN see that theRE exIsts no ChOicE Of the cOeffiCiENts $A_{kr}$ that satiSfy tHe commutaTion reLAtion $[A,C]=I\Hbar$.

The EigenvEctOrs Of $A(X,p)$ (If ThEy eXiST) anD $c(X,p)$ woULd bUild two mUtUaLly unBiasED BASes aNd tHese Two obServables coulD be ChosEN as A pair Of canOnicAl ConjuGate coOrdinAtEs for the descripTion Of the systEm. THiS chOiCe is rELated tO thE caNonical TransfoRMatIoN OF ClAssical mechanics whErE THe CoordinaTes $(x,p)$ aRE tRaNSformed tO $a(X,p)$ aNd $c(x,P)$ IN a way To prESeRve the PoIsson bRAcKeTs, that iS $\{x,P\}=\{a,c\}=1$. If wE tAke $C(x,p)=Xp$, theN The cOnjugaTe coordiNate iS $A(x,p)=\frac{1}{2}
\ln(\frac{x}{P})$. following this SUgGEStIOn we Can See that the oPeraTOr $$\laBel{ACAnConJToC}
 A=\fRac{1}{2}(\ln x - \lN p)\,$$ aT Least *formally*, has the WaNted coMmutaTion relation. TO prove this WE USe Eqs.(\[comMutPDErIVX\]) and (\[commutXdeRivP\]) iN order to obTAin $[\ln X,P]=i\Hbar/X$ And $[\ln P,X]=-i\Hbar/P$. With MORe mathemAtiCal RigOur IT Is Not clear that sUCH an oPeRator exIstS. FurtheRmoRe, tHe pHysIcAl meaning Of an obseRvAbLe SuCh aS $\ln X$, uNDefined fOr NegAtIve ValueS Of posiTion, iS uncLeAr, LEavIng alonE WhAT WoulD bE tHe mySteRiOus phYsicAL prOcedure To measure $a$. ThE QuesTiOn Of the exIstence of a genErAtor of corrElAtiOns is oPEN.

We come nOw to the question of the exiSTence of The EigenVectOrs of the cOrrElatioN opERator $C$, That is, To detErMinE THe
)$, the commutation relati on equal t o the  co rre sp ondi ng c ommutator of p o siti on and momentum, thatis, $ [A , C]=i \h bar $ . Physi c al l y , w ear e l oo k in g for  an  observ able thatcou ld  act as a *g e ne rator of c orr elations*. O necan pr ov e t h at su chan op erator $A(X,P )$ can no tb e expa n ded ina po werseries $\sum a_{k r }X ^{k}P^{r}$ (no tice t ha t  a n y  po wer  series ca nbe br o ught to th i s “no r mal order” wi th all powe r s o f $X$at  th e  leftof al lp owe rs of $P$).  Inorder toprovet his weu se thecommut ati onrela t io ns  in  E q .(\ [ Co mRe l 3\] ) and we  c an  seethat t h e re e xis ts n o cho ice of the co eff icie n ts$a_{k r}$ t hatsa tisfy  the c ommut at ion relation $[ A,C] =i\hbar$. 

T he  ei ge nvect o rs of$A( X,P )$ (ifthey ex i st)  a n d $C (X,P)$ would build  t w o  m utuallyunbias e dba s es and t he setwoo b serva bles co uld be c hosena sapair of  c anonic al  co nju gatec oord inates  for the  desc r iption of thes ystem. This c h oi c e  i s  rel ate d to the ca noni c al t rans f or mat i on of  clas si c al mechanics where the  c oordin ates$(x,p)$ are t ransformed t o  $a(x,p) $ an d  $ c (x,p)$ in a wa y topreserve t h e Poisso n bra ckets, t hat is $\ { x ,p\}=\{a ,c\ }=1 $.Ifw e  t ake $c(x,p)=x p $ , th en  the co nju gate co ord ina teis$a (x,p)=\fr ac{1}{2} 
\ ln (\ fr ac{ x}{p} ) $. Follo wi ngth issugge s tion w e can  see  t ha t  th e opera t or $ $\la be l{ Acan con jt oC}
A=\f r ac{ 1}{2}(\ ln X - \l n P ) \,$$  a tleast * formally*, ha sthe wanted  c omm utatio n relation . To prove this we useE qs.(\[c omm utPde rivX \]) and ( \[c ommutX der i vP\])in ord er to  o bta i n  $[\l n X, P]= i\ hbar/X$ an d $[\ ln P, X] =-i\ hbar/P$ . With more mathem a tic al rigour itisnotc l ea r t h at suc ha n o p e rator exists. F urthermore ,t he  physicalm ean in g of an  observ ables uch as$\ln X$,undefined  f or n e g ati ve valuesof posit ion, is u n clear ,  l eavin g a lone w ha t w ouldbe the mys terio us phy si cal pr ocedu re  to meas ure $A$. The question o f theexist enc e of a ge ner a tor  of corre lati ons is ope n.
We  come  no w  to t he q u es tio n  of t he e x istence o f  t hee i ge nvectors of t h e c orrel ati o n oper ator  $C$, that is, to determine the
)$, the_commutation relation_equal to the corresponding_commutator of_position_and momentum,_that_is, $[A,C]= i\hbar_$. Physically, we_are looking for an_observable that could_act_as a *generator of correlations*. One can prove that such an operator $A(X,P)$ can_not_be expanded_in_a_power series $\sum a_{kr} X^{k}P^{r}$_(notice that any power series_can be_brought to this “normal order” with all powers_of_$X$ at the_left of all powers of $P$). In order to_prove this we use the commutation_relations in Eq.(\[ComRel3\])_and_we_can see that there_exists no choice of the coefficients_$a_{kr}$ that satisfy the commutation relation_$[A,C]=i\hbar$.

The eigenvectors of $A(X,P)$ (if they exist)_and $C(X,P)$ would build two mutually_unbiased bases and these two_observables could_be chosen as a pair_of canonical conjugate_coordinates for_the description of_the system. This choice is related_to the canonical_transformation of classical mechanics where the_coordinates_$(x,p)$ are transformed_to_$a(x,p)$_and $c(x,p)$_in a way_to_preserve the_Poisson_brackets, that is $\{x,p\}=\{a,c\}=1$. If we_take_$c(x,p)=xp$, then the conjugate coordinate is $a(x,p)=\frac{1}{2}
\ln(\frac{x}{p})$._Following this suggestion we_can_see that the operator_$$\label{AcanconjtoC}
 A=\frac{1}{2}(\ln X - \ln_P)\,$$ at least *formally*, has the_wanted commutation_relation. To_prove this we use Eqs.(\[commutPderivX\]) and (\[commutXderivP\]) in order to obtain_$[\ln X,P]=i\hbar/X$ and $[\ln P,X]=-i\hbar/P$. With_more mathematical rigour it_is not_clear_that such an_operator_exists. Furthermore,_the physical meaning of an observable such_as $\ln_X$, undefined for negative values of_position, is unclear, leaving_alone_what would be the mysterious physical_procedure to measure $A$. The question_of the existence of a_generator_of_correlations is open.

We come now_to the question of the existence_of the eigenvectors_of the correlation operator $C$, that is,_to_determine the