 ions order ferromagnetically, while the corresponding Ni and Co ions order antiferromagnetically. Therefore, as seen in figures 1c and 1d, there is not much contribution of the magnetic field into the measured specific heat.

&gt;From resistivity measurements the LaMnO$_{3}$, La$_{1.5}$Sr$_{0.5}$NiO$_{4}$ and La$_{1.5}$Sr$_{0.5}$CoO$_{4}$ samples are electrical insulators at low temperatures, and applied magnetic fields up to 9 T are not strong enough to destroy this characteristic[@Zaliznyak],[@Wochner],[@Myron]. Therefore, we should not expect for the previous three crystals the linear contribution from free electrons to the specific heat. However, other kind of many-body excitations could also lead to a linear contribution[@Smolyaninova1]. On the other hand, the La$_{1.35}$Sr$_{1.65}$Mn$_{2}$O$_{7}$ is metallic below about 100 K[@Okuda]. Our fitting shows that $\beta
_{1} $ values are big for La$_{1.35}$Sr$_{1.65}$Mn$_{2}$O$_{7}$ and La$_{1.5}
$Sr$_{0.5}$NiO$_{4}$. To facilitate even more the comparison, we have re-plotted in figure 2 the data for the La$_{1.35}$Sr$_{1.65}$Mn$_{2}$O$_{7}$ and La$_{1.5}$Sr$_{0.5}$NiO$_{4}$ crystals at temperatures below 10 K. Closed symbols represent the measurements with [*H=0*]{} and open ones with [*9 T*]{}.

Okuda et al.[@Okuda] found that the decrease of specific heat at low temperatures, due to an applied magnetic field of 9 T, was about ten times larger in a La$_{1.35}$Sr$_{1.65}$Mn$_{2}$O$_{7}$ sample than the observed values in La$_{1-x}$Sr$_{x}$MnO$_{3}$ samples (with x=0.3 and 0.4). They also calculated the theoretical reduction in specific heat upon application of a magnetic field for the ideal simple-cubic (3D) and simple-square (2D) lattices and concluded that the observed change in specific heat for the bilayered manganite was large, but still less than that
ions order ferromagnetically, while the corresponding Ni and Co ions decree antiferromagnetically. consequently, as seen in figures 1c and 1d, there be not much contribution of the charismatic field into the measured specific heat. 

 & gt;From resistivity measurement the LaMnO$_{3}$, La$_{1.5}$Sr$_{0.5}$NiO$_{4}$ and La$_{1.5}$Sr$_{0.5}$CoO$_{4}$ sample distribution are electrical insulators at low temperatures, and apply magnetic fields up to 9 T are not strong enough to destroy this characteristic[@Zaliznyak],[@Wochner],[@Myron ]. Therefore, we should not ask for the previous three crystals the linear contribution from barren electrons to the specific heat. However, other kind of many - body excitement could also lead to a linear contribution[@Smolyaninova1 ]. On the other hand, the La$_{1.35}$Sr$_{1.65}$Mn$_{2}$O$_{7}$ is metallic below approximately 100 K[@Okuda ]. Our fitting shows that $ \beta 
 _ { 1 } $ values are big for La$_{1.35}$Sr$_{1.65}$Mn$_{2}$O$_{7}$ and La$_{1.5 } 
 $ Sr$_{0.5}$NiO$_{4}$. To facilitate even more the comparison, we have re - plotted in figure 2 the datum for the La$_{1.35}$Sr$_{1.65}$Mn$_{2}$O$_{7}$ and La$_{1.5}$Sr$_{0.5}$NiO$_{4}$ crystal at temperatures below 10 K. Closed symbols represent the measurements with [ * H=0 * ] { } and open ones with [ * 9 T * ] { }. 

 Okuda et al.[@Okuda ] found that the decrease of specific heat at low temperature, due to an applied magnetic sphere of 9 metric ton, was about ten times larger in a La$_{1.35}$Sr$_{1.65}$Mn$_{2}$O$_{7}$ sample than the observed values in La$_{1 - x}$Sr$_{x}$MnO$_{3}$ samples (with x=0.3 and 0.4). They besides calculated the theoretical reduction in specific heat upon application of a magnetic field for the ideal simple - cubic (3D) and simple - square (2D) lattices and concluded that the ascertained change in specific hotness for the bilayered manganite was large, but still less than that
 iond order ferromagneticalln, while the corrgspondinj Ni ans Co ionr order antiferromagneticallb. Thwrefoee, as seen in figures 1z and 1d, tjere is bot nych contriuhtion on the lagnztmc field into tme measured specific heat.

&ct;Wrlm resistivity measurements the LaMgO$_{3}$, La$_{1.5}$Sr$_{0.5}$MiL$_{4}$ and La$_{1.5}$Sr$_{0.5}$CoO$_{4}$ fampkqs adv tlectrical insulators at low tempsraturev, and applied magnetic fields up to 9 T wre jot strong enough ho destroy jgis xharacteristkc[@Zaliznyak],[@Wochner],[@Myroh]. Therefore, we should not expecg for the previiuw tjtee crystals the jinear contrlnution from ftee electrons bo thx spwcific heat. However, ovher kind of many-bodi excitatimna could also lead ti a lhneas covrricutjoi[@Smklyanijove1]. On the otger hand, thw La$_{1.35}$Sr$_{1.65}$Mn$_{2}$O$_{7}$ is metalloc velow about 100 I[@Okuda]. Otr fitting shows that $\beta
_{1} $ values are tig for La$_{1.35}$Sr$_{1.65}$Mn$_{2}$O$_{7}$ and La$_{1.5}
$Sr$_{0.5}$NiI$_{4}$. To facilitate even lore the somparison, we have re-plotted in figure 2 the data xor tie La$_{1.35}$Wr$_{1.65}$Iv$_{2}$I$_{7}$ wnd La$_{1.5}$Sr$_{0.5}$NiO$_{4}$ crystals at temperatures below 10 K. Dlpsvd symbols represcnt the measuremenys wojh [*H=0*]{} and open unes wnfh [*9 T*]{}.

Okuda et al.[@Okudw] found that the decrtase pf specific heat at low temperatures, duv to an applied magnetnc field of 9 T, wss abput ten times larger in a Lz$_{1.35}$Sr$_{1.65}$Mn$_{2}$O$_{7}$ samppe than tgd observed valuer ik Ld$_{1-x}$Sr$_{x}$MnO$_{3}$ samples (with x=0.3 anq 0.4). They aoso ealculatdd tne thejretical rfductlmn in specific heah upou appnication ov a magnetic field for the ideal simple-cubic (3C) dnd simple-szuare (2D) lattices agd concluded tkat the jbserxed change in sperific heat fjr the bilayesgd manganite xas large, but stiol less ghan that
ions order ferromagnetically, while the corresponding Ni ions antiferromagnetically. Therefore, seen in figures not contribution of the field into the specific heat. &gt;From resistivity measurements the La$_{1.5}$Sr$_{0.5}$NiO$_{4}$ and La$_{1.5}$Sr$_{0.5}$CoO$_{4}$ samples are electrical insulators at low temperatures, and applied magnetic up to 9 T are not strong enough to destroy this characteristic[@Zaliznyak],[@Wochner],[@Myron]. Therefore, should expect the three crystals the linear contribution from free electrons to the specific heat. However, other kind of excitations could also lead to a linear contribution[@Smolyaninova1]. the other hand, the is metallic below about 100 Our shows that _{1} values big for La$_{1.35}$Sr$_{1.65}$Mn$_{2}$O$_{7}$ La$_{1.5} $Sr$_{0.5}$NiO$_{4}$. To facilitate even more the comparison, we have re-plotted in figure 2 the data for La$_{1.35}$Sr$_{1.65}$Mn$_{2}$O$_{7}$ and at temperatures 10 Closed represent the measurements and open ones with [*9 T*]{}. found that the decrease of specific heat at temperatures, due an applied magnetic field of 9 was about ten times larger in a La$_{1.35}$Sr$_{1.65}$Mn$_{2}$O$_{7}$ than the observed values in La$_{1-x}$Sr$_{x}$MnO$_{3}$ samples (with x=0.3 and 0.4). They also calculated the in specific heat upon of a magnetic for ideal (3D) simple-square (2D) and concluded that the observed change in specific heat for the manganite was large, but still less than that
 ions order ferromagneticallY, while the cOrresPonDinG NI and co ioNs order antiferROmagNetically. Therefore, as seEn in fIgURes 1c ANd 1D, therE is not mUCh CONtrIbUtIon Of THe MagneTic Field inTo the measuRed SpEcific heat.

&gt;fRoM resistiviTy mEasurements tHe LAMnO$_{3}$, La$_{1.5}$sr$_{0.5}$niO$_{4}$ ANd La$_{1.5}$SR$_{0.5}$Coo$_{4}$ sampLes are ELectriCal insulaToRS at low TEmperatUREs, And aPplied magnetic fieLDs UP to 9 T are not stroNg enouGh TO dESTroY thIs characteRiStic[@ZALiznyak],[@wOcHNER],[@MyROn]. Therefore, we Should not exPEct For the PrEviOUs threE crysTaLS thE linear contRibuTion from fRee eleCTrons to THe speciFic heaT. HoWevEr, otHEr KiNd oF mANy-bODy ExcITatIons coulD aLsO lead To a lINEAR conTriButiOn[@SmoLyaninova1]. On thE otHer hANd, tHe La$_{1.35}$SR$_{1.65}$Mn$_{2}$O$_{7}$ iS metAlLic beLow aboUt 100 K[@OkUdA]. Our fitting showS thaT $\beta
_{1} $ valuEs aRe Big FoR La$_{1.35}$Sr$_{1.65}$mN$_{2}$O$_{7}$ and LA$_{1.5}
$Sr$_{0.5}$niO$_{4}$. to facilItate evEN moRe THE CoMparison, we have re-plOtTED iN figure 2 tHe data FOr ThE la$_{1.35}$Sr$_{1.65}$Mn$_{2}$O$_{7}$ aNd la$_{1.5}$SR$_{0.5}$NiO$_{4}$ CRYstalS at tEMpEratures Below 10 K. cLoSeD symbolS rEpreseNt The MeaSuremENts wIth [*H=0*]{} anD open oneS with [*9 t*]{}.

okuda et al.[@Okuda] FOund that the deCReASE oF SpecIfiC heat at low tEmpeRAturEs, duE To An aPPlied MagneTiC FiELd of 9 T, was about ten timEs Larger In a La$_{1.35}$sr$_{1.65}$Mn$_{2}$O$_{7}$ sample thAn the obserVED Values in la$_{1-x}$SR$_{X}$MNo$_{3}$ samples (with x=0.3 aNd 0.4). TheY also calcuLAted the tHeoreTical redUction in sPECific heaT upOn aPplIcaTIOn Of a magnetic fiELD for ThE ideal sImpLe-cubic (3d) anD siMplE-sqUaRe (2D) latticEs and conClUdEd ThAt tHe obsERved chanGe In sPeCifIc heaT For the BilayEred MaNgANitE was larGE, bUT StilL lEsS thaN thAt
 ions order ferromagnetica lly, while  thecor res po ndin g Ni  and Co ions o r derantiferromagnetically.  Ther ef o re,a sseenin figu r es 1 c a nd  1 d,th e re  is n otmuch co ntribution  of  t he magneticf ie ld into th e m easured spec ifi c heat .
&g t ;From  re sisti vity m e asurem ents theLa M nO$_{3 } $, La$_ { 1 .5 }$Sr $_{0.5}$NiO$_{4}$ an d  La$_{1.5}$Sr$ _{0.5} $C o O$ _ { 4}$  sa mples areel ectri c al insu l at o r s  at low temperatu res, and ap p lie d magn et icf ieldsup to  9 T a re not stro ng e nough todestro y  this c h aracter istic[ @Za liz nyak ] ,[ @W och ne r ],[ @ My ron ] . T herefore ,we  shou ld n o t e xpec t f or t he pr evious threecry stal s  th e lin ear c ontr ib ution  fromfreeel ectrons to thespec ific heat . H ow eve r,  othe r  kindofman y-bodyexcitat i ons  c o u l dalso lead to a lin ea r co ntributi on[@Sm o ly an i nova1].On  th e ot h e r han d, t h eLa$_{1.3 5}$Sr$ _ {1 .6 5}$Mn$_ {2 }$O$_{ 7} $ i s m etall i c be low ab out 100K[@Ok u da]. Our fitti n g shows that$ \b e t a_ {1}$ v alues are b ig f o r La $_{1 . 35 }$S r $_{1. 65}$M n$ _ {2 } $O$_{7}$ and La$_{1 .5 }
$Sr$ _{0.5 }$NiO$_{4}$.To facilit a t e  even mo re t h ec omparison, wehavere-plotted in figur e 2 t he datafor the L a $ _{1.35}$ Sr$ _{1 .65 }$M n $ _{ 2}$O$_{7}$ an d La$_ {1 .5}$Sr$ _{0 .5}$NiO $_{ 4}$  cr yst al s at temp eratures  b el ow  1 0 K . Clo s ed symbo ls  re pr ese nt th e  measu remen ts w it h[ *H= 0*]{} a n do p en o ne swith  [* 9T*]{} .

O k uda  et al. [@Okuda]fou n d th at  t he decr ease of speci fi c heat atlo w t empera t u res, due  to an applied magnetic field o f 9  T, w as a bout tentim es lar ger in a L a$_{1. 35}$S r$ _{1 . 6 5}$Mn $ _ {2 }$O $_ {7}$ sampl e tha n the  o bser ved val ues in La$_{1-x}$S r $_{ x}$MnO$_{3}$sam ples ( wi thx =0 . 3 a nd 0.4 ) .  They also calc ulated the  t h eo retical re d uct io n in sp ecificheatu pon app licationof a magn et ic f i e ldfor the id eal simp le-cubic( 3D) a n dsimpl e-s quare(2 D)latti ces an d  co nclud ed tha tthe ob serve dchange i n specific heat for the  bilay eredman ganite wa s l a rge , but sti ll l ess than t hat 
 ions order_ferromagnetically, while_the corresponding Ni and_Co ions_order_antiferromagnetically. Therefore,_as_seen in figures_1c and 1d,_there is not much_contribution of the_magnetic_field into the measured specific heat.

&gt;From resistivity measurements the LaMnO$_{3}$, La$_{1.5}$Sr$_{0.5}$NiO$_{4}$ and La$_{1.5}$Sr$_{0.5}$CoO$_{4}$ samples_are_electrical insulators_at_low_temperatures, and applied magnetic fields_up to 9 T are_not strong_enough to destroy this characteristic[@Zaliznyak],[@Wochner],[@Myron]. Therefore, we should_not_expect for the_previous three crystals the linear contribution from free electrons_to the specific heat. However, other_kind of many-body_excitations_could_also lead to a_linear contribution[@Smolyaninova1]. On the other hand,_the La$_{1.35}$Sr$_{1.65}$Mn$_{2}$O$_{7}$ is metallic below about_100 K[@Okuda]. Our fitting shows that $\beta
_{1}_$ values are big for La$_{1.35}$Sr$_{1.65}$Mn$_{2}$O$_{7}$_and La$_{1.5}
$Sr$_{0.5}$NiO$_{4}$. To facilitate even_more the_comparison, we have re-plotted in_figure 2 the_data for_the La$_{1.35}$Sr$_{1.65}$Mn$_{2}$O$_{7}$ and_La$_{1.5}$Sr$_{0.5}$NiO$_{4}$ crystals at temperatures below 10_K. Closed symbols_represent the measurements with [*H=0*]{} and_open_ones with [*9_T*]{}.

Okuda_et_al.[@Okuda] found_that the decrease_of_specific heat_at_low temperatures, due to an applied_magnetic_field of 9 T, was about ten_times larger in a_La$_{1.35}$Sr$_{1.65}$Mn$_{2}$O$_{7}$_sample than the observed_values in La$_{1-x}$Sr$_{x}$MnO$_{3}$ samples (with_x=0.3 and 0.4). They also calculated_the theoretical_reduction in_specific heat upon application of a magnetic field for the ideal_simple-cubic (3D) and simple-square (2D) lattices_and concluded that the_observed change_in_specific heat for_the_bilayered manganite_was large, but still less than that