\[ssec:ap2\] and \[ssec:arch\]). We now quantify how the size of the aperture affects the observed ratio of the dynamical and luminous masses of a cluster, $M_{dyn}/M_{lum}$. In other words, we derive $M_{dyn}/M_{lum}$ as would be done by an observer.

Quantifying the impact of the aperture {#ssec:ap2}
--------------------------------------

When the aperture is large, the cylinder it defines (i.e. the cylinder with the line-of-sight as its main axis) intercepts a greater fraction of the outer shells containing the stars expanding in the vicinity of the tidal radius and beyond. As a result, the measured radial velocity dispersion rises. This simple exercise demonstrates the importance of the size of the field-of-view: the smaller the aperture, the smaller the observed departure from virial equilibrium, and the shorter the time-span required for the cluster targeted region to return to equilibrium.

Figure \[fig:mdml\] shows the post-gas-expulsion evolution of $M_{dyn}/M_{lum}$. Each panel corresponds to a different set of model parameters, i.e. star formation efficiency ($\epsilon$), gas expulsion time-scale ($\tau_{gexp}/\tau_{cross}$), tidal field impact ($r_h/r_t$) and their corresponding final bound fraction ($F_{bound}$). The cases covered by Fig. \[fig:mdml\] range from the complete disruption of the cluster ($F_{bound}=0$ in top panel \[a\]) to a cluster barely affected by gas expulsion ($F_{bound} \lesssim 1$ in bottom panel \[d\]). Note the degeneracy between panels \[b\] and \[c\]: the lower SFE of panel \[b\] (SFE=0.33 compared to 0.40 in panel \[c\]) is compensated by its longer gas-expulsion time-scale ($\tau_{gexp}=\tau_{cross}$ compared to $\tau_{gexp}=0$ in panel \[c\]). Each panel considers in turn four aperture radii, $r_{ap}=$ 3.5, 5, 10 and 20pc, which correspond to 4.5, 6.4, 12.8 and 25.6 cluster initial half-mass radii ($r_{hm, init}=0.8$pc; see key in top panel). Measuring in our simulations the observed half-light radius for apertures smaller
\[ssec: ap2\ ] and \[ssec: arch\ ]). We now quantify how the size of the aperture affects the observed ratio of the dynamic and aglow bulk of a cluster, $ M_{dyn}/M_{lum}$. In early words, we deduce $ M_{dyn}/M_{lum}$ as would be done by an observer. 

 quantify the shock of the aperture { # ssec: ap2 } 
 -------------------------------------- 

 When the aperture is large, the cylinder it specify (i.e. the cylinder with the line - of - sight as its independent axis) intercepts a big fraction of the out shells containing the stars expanding in the vicinity of the tidal radius and beyond. As a consequence, the measured radial velocity dispersion rise. This simple exercise demonstrates the importance of the size of the battlefield - of - view: the smaller the aperture, the smaller the observed departure from virial chemical equilibrium, and the shorter the time - span required for the cluster targeted region to return to equilibrium. 

 Figure \[fig: mdml\ ] shows the post - gas - expulsion evolution of $ M_{dyn}/M_{lum}$. Each panel corresponds to a different set of model parameter, i.e. star formation efficiency ($ \epsilon$), natural gas ejection time - scale ($ \tau_{gexp}/\tau_{cross}$), tidal field impingement ($ r_h / r_t$) and their corresponding final bound fraction ($ F_{bound}$). The cases cover by Fig.   \[fig: mdml\ ] range from the complete disruption of the cluster ($ F_{bound}=0 $ in top panel \[a\ ]) to a cluster scantily affected by gas expulsion ($ F_{bound } \lesssim 1 $ in bottom panel \[d\ ]). Note the degeneracy between panels \[b\ ] and \[c\ ]: the low SFE of panel \[b\ ] (SFE=0.33 compare to 0.40 in panel \[c\ ]) is compensated by its longer accelerator - expulsion time - scale ($ \tau_{gexp}=\tau_{cross}$ compare to $ \tau_{gexp}=0 $ in panel \[c\ ]). Each panel considers in turn four aperture radius, $ r_{ap}=$ 3.5, 5, 10 and 20pc, which correspond to 4.5, 6.4, 12.8 and 25.6 bunch initial half - mass radii ($ r_{hm, init}=0.8$pc; see key in top panel). measure in our simulations the observe half - light spoke for apertures smaller
\[ssef:ap2\] and \[ssec:arch\]). We now duantify how thg wize oh the alerture xffects the observed ratio oh thw dynqmical and luminous marses of a cluster, $M_{dyi}/M_{lum}$. In other words, we derive $L_{dyn}/K_{oum}$ as would bg done by an observer.

Quanthfhiug the impact of the aperture {#ssec:ap2}
--------------------------------------

Rhen thr wperture is latge, tnq cympnber it defines (i.e. the cylinder sith tht line-of-sight as iys main axis) intercepts a hreaher fraction of thf outer sheols sintaining thd stars exkauding in thg vicinity of the tidal radius avd bevond. As a rgshlh, the measurxd radpal velocity dispersimn risex. This simple cxercmse eemonstrates the impoctance of the size os the fiend-kf-view: the smallee rhe akertuse, tfw soalmec tge obsfrvxd departurs from viriql equilibrium, and uhe whorter the tjme-spag wequired for the cluster targeted regiot tk return to equilibrium.

Digure \[fig:mdml\] shows jhe post-gaf-expulsion evolution of $M_{dyn}/M_{lum}$. Each panel correvponda to a aufverent set of model parameters, i.e. star formatykn enficiency ($\epsilok$), gas expulsion tike-dcsje ($\tau_{gexp}/\tau_{zross}$), cjdzl field impact ($r_h/g_t$) and jheir xorresponqing final bound fraction ($F_{boune}$). The cases boveeed by Fig. \[fig:mdml\] xange from tke comklete cisruption of the clustzr ($F_{bohnd}=0$ in top oanel \[a\]) tk a cluster barelh anfewted by gas expulsion ($F_{bougd} \lesssin 1$ iu bottom pangl \[d\]). Noee the degfneragf between panels \[b\] and \[e\]: the lower SFE of panel \[b\] (SFE=0.33 compared to 0.40 in panel \[c\]) is cokpansdted by nts lokger gas-expulsijn time-scale ($\tcu_{gexp}=\tab_{cross}$ compared no $\tau_{gex'}=0$ in panel \[c\]). Each panel cmjsiders in tnrn four wperrure radii, $f_{xp}=$ 3.5, 5, 10 and 20pc, wnich corrvskond to 4.5, 6.4, 12.8 and 25.6 cluster initlal hxmf-mass radii ($r_{hn, ibit}=0.8$pc; see key im tup [ajek). Iaasuring in mur rimjkatiovs the obsevvea hakf-light radius for a[erthres smaller
\[ssec:ap2\] and \[ssec:arch\]). We now quantify how of aperture affects observed ratio of of cluster, $M_{dyn}/M_{lum}$. In words, we derive as would be done by an Quantifying the impact of the aperture {#ssec:ap2} -------------------------------------- When the aperture is large, cylinder it defines (i.e. the cylinder with the line-of-sight as its main axis) a fraction the shells containing the stars expanding in the vicinity of the tidal radius and beyond. As a the measured radial velocity dispersion rises. This simple demonstrates the importance of size of the field-of-view: the the the smaller observed from equilibrium, and the the time-span required for the cluster targeted region to return to equilibrium. Figure \[fig:mdml\] shows the post-gas-expulsion of $M_{dyn}/M_{lum}$. corresponds to different of parameters, i.e. star ($\epsilon$), gas expulsion time-scale ($\tau_{gexp}/\tau_{cross}$), tidal and their corresponding final bound fraction ($F_{bound}$). The covered by \[fig:mdml\] range from the complete disruption the cluster ($F_{bound}=0$ in top panel \[a\]) to cluster barely affected by gas expulsion ($F_{bound} \lesssim 1$ in bottom panel \[d\]). Note the panels \[b\] and \[c\]: lower SFE of \[b\] compared 0.40 panel \[c\]) compensated by its longer gas-expulsion time-scale ($\tau_{gexp}=\tau_{cross}$ compared to $\tau_{gexp}=0$ in \[c\]). Each panel considers in turn four aperture radii, $r_{ap}=$ 10 20pc, which correspond 4.5, 6.4, 12.8 and cluster half-mass radii ($r_{hm, init}=0.8$pc; in panel). simulations observed radius for apertures smaller
\[ssec:ap2\] and \[ssec:arch\]). We now quaNtify how thE size Of tHe aPeRturE affEcts the observeD RatiO of the dynamical and lumiNous mAsSEs of A ClUster, $m_{dyn}/M_{luM}$. in OTHer WoRdS, we DeRIvE $M_{dyn}/m_{luM}$ as woulD be done by aN obSeRver.

QuantifyINg The impact oF thE aperture {#sseC:ap2}
--------------------------------------

when thE aPerTUre is LarGe, the CylindER it defInes (i.e. the CyLInder wITh the liNE-Of-SighT as its main axis) intERcEPts a greater fraCtion oF tHE oUTEr sHelLs containiNg The stARs expanDInG IN The VIcinity of the tIdal radius aND beYond. As A rEsuLT, the meAsureD rADiaL velocity diSperSion rises. this siMPle exerCIse demoNstratEs tHe iMporTAnCe Of tHe SIze OF tHe fIEld-Of-view: thE sMaLler tHe apERTURe, thE smAlleR the oBserved departUre From VIriAl equIlibrIum, aNd The shOrter tHe timE-sPan required for tHe clUster targEteD rEgiOn To retURn to eqUilIbrIum.

FiguRe \[fig:mdML\] shOwS THE pOst-gas-expulsion evoLuTIOn Of $M_{dyn}/M_{lUm}$. Each PAnEl COrresponDs To a DiffEREnt seT of mODeL parametErs, i.e. sTAr FoRmation EfFicienCy ($\EpsIloN$), gas eXPulsIon timE-scale ($\taU_{gexp}/\TAu_{cross}$), tidal fiELd impact ($r_h/r_t$) aND tHEIr COrreSpoNding final bOund FRactIon ($F_{BOuNd}$). THE caseS coveReD By fIg. \[fig:mdml\] range from tHe CompleTe disRuption of the cLuster ($F_{bouND}=0$ IN top paneL \[a\]) to A ClUSter barely affeCted bY gas expulsIOn ($F_{bound} \LesssIm 1$ in bottOm panel \[d\]). NOTE the degeNerAcy BetWeeN PAnEls \[b\] and \[c\]: the loWER SFE Of Panel \[b\] (SfE=0.33 cOmpared To 0.40 iN paNel \[C\]) is CoMpensated By its lonGeR gAs-ExPulSion tIMe-scale ($\tAu_{GexP}=\tAu_{cRoss}$ cOMpared To $\tau_{Gexp}=0$ In PaNEl \[c\]). each panEL cONSideRs In Turn FouR aPertuRe raDIi, $r_{Ap}=$ 3.5, 5, 10 and 20pc, Which corrEspONd to 4.5, 6.4, 12.8 AnD 25.6 cLuster iNitial half-masS rAdii ($r_{hm, iniT}=0.8$pC; seE key in TOP panel). MeAsuring in our simulations THe obserVed Half-lIght Radius for ApeRtures SmaLLer
\[ssec:ap2\] and \[ssec:ar ch\]). Wenow q uan tif yhowthesize of the ap e rtur e affects the observed  rati oo f th e  d ynami cal and lu m i nou sma sse so fa clu ste r, $M_{ dyn}/M_{lu m}$ .In other wor d s,  we derive  $M _{dyn}/M_{lu m}$  as wo ul d b e  done  by  an o bserve r .

Qua ntifyingth e  impac t  of the a pe rtur e {#ssec:ap2}
--- - -- - -------------- ------ -- - -- - - --- -
When the a pe rture is larg e ,t h e  cy l inder it defi nes (i.e. t h e c ylinde rwit h  the l ine-o f- s igh t as its ma in a xis) inte rcepts a great e r fract ion of  th e o uter sh el lsco n tai n in g t h e s tars exp an di ng in  the v i c init y o f th e tid al radius and  be yond .  As  a re sult,  the  m easur ed rad ial v el ocity dispersio n ri ses. This  si mp leex ercis e  demon str ate s the i mportan c e o ft h e  s ize of the field-o f- v i ew : the sm allert he  a p erture,th e s mall e r  theobse r ve d depart ure fr o mvi rial eq ui libriu m,  an d t he sh o rter  the t ime-span  requ i red for the cl u ster targeted re g i on to r etu rn to equil ibri u m.
Figu r e\[f i g:mdm l\] s ho w st he post-gas-expulsi on  evolu tionof $M_{dyn}/M _{lum}$. E a c h  panel c orre s po n ds to a differ ent s et of mode l  paramet ers,i.e. sta r formati o n  efficie ncy  ($ \ep sil o n $) , gas expulsi o n  tim e- scale ( $\t au_{gex p}/ \ta u_{ cro ss }$), tida l fieldim pa ct  ( $r_ h/r_t $ ) and th ei r c or res pondi n g fina l bou nd f ra ct i on($F_{bo u nd } $ ). T he  c ases  co ve red b y Fi g . \ [fig:md ml\] rang e f r om t he  c omplete  disruption o fthe cluste r($F _{boun d } =0$ in t op panel \[a\]) to a cl u ster ba rel y aff ecte d by gasexp ulsion  ($ F _{boun d} \le sssim  1 $ i n botto m pa nel  \ [d\]). Not e the  dege ne racy  betwee n panels \[b\] and \[c \]: the lower  SF E of p an el\ [b \ ] ( SF E =0. 3 3  compared to 0. 40 in pane l\ [c \]) is com p ens at ed by i ts long er ga s -expuls ion time- scale ($\ ta u_{g e x p}= \tau_{cros s}$ comp ared to $ \ tau_{ g ex p}=0$  in  panel  \ [c\ ]). E ach pa n elconsi ders i nturn f our a pe rture ra dii, $r_{ap}=$ 3.5, 5,10 and  20pc , w hich corr esp o ndto 4.5, 6 .4,12.8 and 2 5.6  cl uster  in i tialhalf - ma ssr adii($r_ { hm, init} = 0. 8$p c ;  s ee key in t o p pan el).Mea s uringin o ur simulations th e  observed half -lig h t  ra diu s  for  a pertures small er
\[ssec:ap2\] and_\[ssec:arch\]). We_now quantify how the_size of_the_aperture affects_the_observed ratio of_the dynamical and_luminous masses of a_cluster, $M_{dyn}/M_{lum}$. In_other_words, we derive $M_{dyn}/M_{lum}$ as would be done by an observer.

Quantifying the impact of_the_aperture {#ssec:ap2}
--------------------------------------

When_the_aperture_is large, the cylinder it_defines (i.e. the cylinder with_the line-of-sight_as its main axis) intercepts a greater fraction_of_the outer shells_containing the stars expanding in the vicinity of the_tidal radius and beyond. As a_result, the measured_radial_velocity_dispersion rises. This simple_exercise demonstrates the importance of the_size of the field-of-view: the smaller_the aperture, the smaller the observed departure_from virial equilibrium, and the shorter_the time-span required for the_cluster targeted_region to return to equilibrium.

Figure_\[fig:mdml\] shows the_post-gas-expulsion evolution_of $M_{dyn}/M_{lum}$. Each_panel corresponds to a different set_of model parameters,_i.e. star formation efficiency ($\epsilon$), gas_expulsion_time-scale ($\tau_{gexp}/\tau_{cross}$), tidal_field_impact_($r_h/r_t$) and_their corresponding final_bound_fraction ($F_{bound}$)._The_cases covered by Fig. \[fig:mdml\] range from_the_complete disruption of the cluster ($F_{bound}=0$ in_top panel \[a\]) to_a_cluster barely affected by_gas expulsion ($F_{bound} \lesssim 1$_in bottom panel \[d\]). Note the_degeneracy between_panels \[b\]_and \[c\]: the lower SFE of panel \[b\] (SFE=0.33 compared to_0.40 in panel \[c\]) is compensated_by its longer gas-expulsion_time-scale ($\tau_{gexp}=\tau_{cross}$_compared_to $\tau_{gexp}=0$ in_panel_\[c\]). Each_panel considers in turn four aperture radii,_$r_{ap}=$ 3.5,_5, 10 and 20pc, which correspond_to 4.5, 6.4, 12.8_and_25.6 cluster initial half-mass radii ($r_{hm,_init}=0.8$pc; see key in top panel)._Measuring in our simulations the_observed_half-light_radius for apertures smaller