_0$ (22 repetitions). In these cases 20 and 22 force-distance relations were obtained, the mean force gradients were computed and their total experimental errors were determined at a 67% confidence level as a combination of random and systematic errors (see Ref. [@27] for details). In Fig. \[fg2\](a,b) the mean gradients of the Casimir force and their errors measured for the first sample with applied compensating voltage are shown as crosses with a step of 1nm. Table  1 presents the values of mean $F^{\prime}(a)$ at several separations measured in the two different ways for the first (columns a,b) and second (columns c,d) samples. As can be seen in Table 1, the measurement results for the two graphene samples obtained in two different ways are in very good mutual agreement.

Now we compare the experimental results with theoretical predictions. At the moment there is no theory allowing rigorous calculation of the Casimir force between a graphene deposited on a Si-SiO${}_2$ substrate and an Au sphere. The problem is that Si and SiO${}_2$ layers are described by their dielectric permittivities and the reflection properties of graphene in the Dirac model are described by the polarization tensor. This does not allow direct application of the Lifshitz theory for layered structures [@23; @30]. Because of this, here we restrict ourselves to the approximate approach, where the contributions of Si-SiO${}_2$ substrate and graphene sheet to the Casimir interaction with an Au sphere are computed separately using the Lifshitz theory and are then added together. In the framework of the proximity force approximation (PFA), the Lifshitz formula for the gradient of the Casimir force between an Au sphere and any planar structure takes the form $$F^{\prime}(a)=2k_BTR\sum_{l=0}^{\infty}{\vphantom{\sum}}^{\prime}
\!\!\int_{0}^{\infty}\!\!\!\!
q_lk_{\bot}dk_{\bot}\sum_{\alpha}
\frac{r_{\alpha}^{(1)}r_{\alpha}^{(2)}}{e^{2q_la}-r_{\alpha}^{(1)}r_{\alpha}^{(2)}}.
\label{eq3}$$ Here $k_B$ is the Boltzmann constant, $T=300\,$K is the laboratory temperature, $k_{\bot}$ is the projection of the wave vector on a planar structure, $q_l^2=k
_ 0 $ (22 repetitions). In these cases 20 and 22 force - distance relations were prevail, the base force gradients were computed and their full experimental errors were determined at a 67% assurance level as a combination of random and systematic errors (attend Ref.   [ @27 ] for details). In Fig.   \[fg2\](a, b) the mean gradient of the Casimir force and their errors quantify for the inaugural sample with applied compensating voltage are shown as crosses with a measure of 1 nm. Table   1 presents the value of mean $ F^{\prime}(a)$ at several separations measured in the two unlike ways for the beginning (columns a, b) and second (columns c, d) samples. As can be see in Table   1, the measurement results for the two graphene samples obtained in two different ways are in very effective mutual agreement. 

 Now we compare the experimental results with theoretical predictions. At the moment there is no theory allowing rigorous calculation of the Casimir force between a graphene deposited on a Si - SiO${}_2 $ substrate and an Au sector. The problem is that Si and SiO${}_2 $ layers are identify by their dielectric permittivities and the mirror image properties of graphene in the Dirac model are described by the polarization tensor. This does not permit lineal application of the Lifshitz theory for layered structures [ @23; @30 ]. Because of this, here we qualify ourselves to the approximate approach, where the contributions of Si - SiO${}_2 $ substrate and graphene sheet to the Casimir interaction with an Au sphere are computed separately use the Lifshitz theory and are then added together. In the framework of the proximity violence estimate (PFA), the Lifshitz rule for the gradient of the Casimir force between an Au sphere and any planar structure takes the mannequin $ $ F^{\prime}(a)=2k_BTR\sum_{l=0}^{\infty}{\vphantom{\sum}}^{\prime } 
 \!\!\int_{0}^{\infty}\!\!\!\! 
 q_lk_{\bot}dk_{\bot}\sum_{\alpha } 
 \frac{r_{\alpha}^{(1)}r_{\alpha}^{(2)}}{e^{2q_la}-r_{\alpha}^{(1)}r_{\alpha}^{(2) } }. 
 \label{eq3}$$ Here $ k_B$ is the Boltzmann constant, $ T=300\,$K is the laboratory temperature, $ k_{\bot}$ is the projection of the wave vector on a planar structure, $ q_l^2 = k
_0$ (22 rfpetitions). In these caser 20 and 22 force-distance celatiohs were ubtained, the mean force gradmentw wert computed and theif total eqperimentql ecrors were determined at a 67% cohnidenee level as a cokbination mf random and vyrtzmatic errors (see Ref. [@27] for details). In Fig. \[fg2\](a,n) hhe mean gradignts ps ths Casimir force and their errors msasured for the firsy sample with applied compfnsahing voltage are sjown as crowses qith a step uf 1nm. Tablt  1 presents jhe values of mean $F^{\prime}(a)$ at sexeral separatiobs mewvured in thx two qifferent wanx for dhe firxt (columns a,b) snd sexond (columns c,d) samplxs. As can be seen in Table 1, tha jeasurement resulrs for jhe tfo gfqphdne sempmes obhaiied in two sifferent wqys are in very gooc ilyual agreemeht.

Now re compare the experimental results with uheorstical predictions. At tye moment there is no theory ajlowing rigorous calculation of the Casimir force betwxev a gvaphdbe deposited on a Si-SiO${}_2$ substrate and an Au sphqde. Tme problem is thct Si and SiO${}_2$ lauegs wre described by thzjr dielectric permithivitief and the refltctiom properties of graphene in the Dirac mjeel are described yy the polarnzatiom tenxor. This does not allow dirsct applicahion of tgd Lifshitz theorh fpr layered structures [@23; @30]. Becatse of thms, hexe we rertrivt ourfelves to hhe ai[roximate approach, wherg the wontributilns of Si-SiO${}_2$ substrate and grapixne sheet to jhe Cavimir inceractlon with an Au fphere are comkuted sepcratelh using thv Lifshitv theory and are then addaf together. Ii the fraiewoek od the pfuximity force spproximanijn (PDA), the Lifshitz fovmula ror the gradienc if the Casimir gorze fenwexn an Du sphere ang anh pusnar rtructure tckds tne form $$F^{\prime}(a)=2k_BTR\sgm_{l=0}^{\ihfty}{\vphantom{\sum}}^{\prike}
\!\!\lnt_{0}^{\infty}\!\!\!\!
q_ok_{\bot}dk_{\bjt}\sum_{\alpha}
\frav{r_{\alpha}^{(1)}r_{\alpha}^{(2)}}{e^{2q_la}-r_{\wlpha}^{(1)}c_{\alpha}^{(2)}}.
\uabel{rq3}$$ Rere $k_B$ is the Boltzmann constznt, $T=300\,$K is thc laboratory eempcratore, $k_{\bot}$ is the projection of the wave vector on a planar structure, $w_l^2=k
_0$ (22 repetitions). In these cases 20 force-distance were obtained, mean force gradients experimental were determined at 67% confidence level a combination of random and systematic (see Ref. [@27] for details). In Fig. \[fg2\](a,b) the mean gradients of the force and their errors measured for the first sample with applied compensating voltage shown crosses a of 1nm. Table 1 presents the values of mean $F^{\prime}(a)$ at several separations measured in the different ways for the first (columns a,b) and (columns c,d) samples. As be seen in Table 1, measurement for the graphene obtained two different ways in very good mutual agreement. Now we compare the experimental results with theoretical predictions. At the moment is no rigorous calculation the force a graphene deposited Si-SiO${}_2$ substrate and an Au sphere. that Si and SiO${}_2$ layers are described by dielectric permittivities the reflection properties of graphene in Dirac model are described by the polarization tensor. does not allow direct application of the Lifshitz theory for layered structures [@23; @30]. Because here we restrict ourselves the approximate approach, the of substrate graphene sheet the Casimir interaction with an Au sphere are computed separately using Lifshitz theory and are then added together. In the framework proximity approximation (PFA), the formula for the gradient the force between an Au any structure $$F^{\prime}(a)=2k_BTR\sum_{l=0}^{\infty}{\vphantom{\sum}}^{\prime} q_lk_{\bot}dk_{\bot}\sum_{\alpha} \label{eq3}$$ Here $k_B$ is Boltzmann constant, $T=300\,$K is the temperature, $k_{\bot}$ is the on a planar structure, $q_l^2=k
_0$ (22 repetitions). In these cases 20 anD 22 force-distAnce rElaTioNs Were ObtaIned, the mean forCE graDients were computed and tHeir tOtAL expERiMentaL errors WErE DEteRmInEd aT a 67% COnFidenCe lEvel as a CombinatioN of RaNdom and systeMAtIc errors (seE ReF. [@27] for details). IN FiG. \[fg2\](a,b) tHe MeaN GradiEntS of thE CasimIR force And their eRrORs measURed for tHE FiRst sAmple with applied cOMpENsating voltage Are shoWn AS cROSseS wiTh a step of 1nM. TAble  1 pREsents tHE vALUEs oF Mean $F^{\prime}(a)$ at Several sepaRAtiOns meaSuRed IN the twO diffErENt wAys for the fiRst (cOlumns a,b) aNd secoND (columnS C,d) samplEs. As caN be SeeN in TABlE 1, tHe mEaSUreMEnT reSUltS for the tWo GrAphenE samPLES ObtaIneD in tWo difFerent ways are In vEry gOOd mUtual AgreeMent.

noW we coMpare tHe expErImental results wIth tHeoreticaL prEdIctIoNs. At tHE momenT thEre Is no theOry alloWIng RiGOROuS calculation of the CAsIMIr Force betWeen a gRApHeNE depositEd On a si-Sio${}_2$ SUbstrAte aND aN Au spherE. The prOBlEm Is that SI aNd SiO${}_2$ lAyErs Are DescrIBed bY their DielectrIc perMIttivities and tHE reflection prOPeRTIeS Of grAphEne in the DirAc moDEl arE desCRiBed BY the pOlariZaTIoN Tensor. This does not alLoW direcT applIcation of the LIfshitz theORY For layerEd stRUcTUres [@23; @30]. Because of tHis, heRe we restriCT ourselvEs to tHe approxImate apprOACh, where tHe cOntRibUtiONS oF Si-SiO${}_2$ substraTE And gRaPhene shEet To the CaSimIr iNteRacTiOn with an AU sphere aRe CoMpUtEd sEparaTEly using ThE LiFsHitZ theoRY and arE then AddeD tOgETheR. In the fRAmEWOrk oF tHe ProxImiTy Force ApprOXimAtion (PFa), the LifshItz FOrmuLa FoR the graDient of the CasImIr force betWeEn aN Au sphERE and any pLanar structure takes the fORm $$F^{\primE}(a)=2k_bTR\suM_{l=0}^{\inFty}{\vphantOm{\sUm}}^{\primE}
\!\!\inT_{0}^{\Infty}\!\!\!\!
q_Lk_{\bot}dK_{\bot}\sUm_{\AlpHA}
\Frac{r_{\ALPhA}^{(1)}r_{\aLpHa}^{(2)}}{e^{2q_la}-r_{\alpHA}^{(1)}R_{\alPha}^{(2)}}.
\laBeL{eq3}$$ HEre $k_B$ is The Boltzmann constaNT, $T=300\,$K Is the laboratoRy tEmpeRATuRe, $k_{\BOt}$ IS thE pROjeCTIon of the wave vecTor on a planAr STrUcture, $q_l^2=k
_0$ (22 repetitions). In t hese cases  20 a nd22fo rce- dist ance relations were  obtained, the mean fo rce g ra d ient s  w ere c omputed an d the ir  t ota le xp erime nta l error s were det erm in ed at a 67%c on fidence le vel  as a combin ati on ofra ndo m  andsys temat ic err o rs (se e Ref. [@ 27 ]  for d e tails). I nFig.  \[fg2\](a,b) the me a n gradients of  the C as i mi r for ceand theirer rorsm easured fo r t hef irst sample w ith applied com pensat in g v o ltageare s ho w n a s crosses w itha step of  1nm.T able  1 present s theval ues  ofm ea n$F^ {\ p rim e }( a)$ atseveralse pa ratio ns m e a s u redinthetwo d ifferent ways  fo r th e  fi rst ( colum ns a ,b ) and  secon d (co lu mns c,d) sample s. A s can besee ninTa ble 1 ,  the m eas ure ment re sults f o r t he t w ographene samples o bt a i ne d in two  diffe r en tw ays arein  ve ry g o o d mut uala gr eement.
Now w e  c om pare th eexperi me nta l r esult s  wit h theo reticalpredi c tions. At them oment there i s  n o th e oryall owing rigor ousc alcu lati o noft he Ca simir  f o rc e  between a graphene  d eposit ed on  a Si-SiO${}_ 2$ substra t e and an A u sp h er e . The problemis th at Si andS iO${}_2$  laye rs are d escribedb y  their d iel ect ric  pe r m it tivities andt h e re fl ectionpro perties  of  gr aph ene  i n the Dir ac model  a re  d es cri bed b y  the pol ar iza ti ontenso r . This  does  not  a ll o w d irect a p pl i c atio nof  the  Li fs hitztheo r y f or laye red struc tur e s [@ 23 ;@30]. B ecause of thi s,  here we r es tri ct our s e lves tothe approximate approac h , where  th e con trib utions of  Si -SiO${ }_2 $  subst rate a nd gr ap hen e sheet t othe  C asimir int e r act ion w it h an  Au sph ere are computed s e par ately using t heLifs h i tz  th e or y  an da ret h en added togeth er. In the  f r am ework of t h e p ro ximityforce a pprox i mation(PFA), th e Lifshit zform u l a f or the gra dient of  the Casi m ir fo r ce  betw een  an Au  s phe re an d anyp lan ar st ructur etakesthe f or m $$F^{\ prime}(a)=2k_BTR\sum_{l =0}^{\ infty }{\ vphantom{ \su m }}^ {\prime}\!\! \int_{0}^{ \in fty }\!\! \!\ ! 
q_lk _{\b o t} dk_ { \bot} \sum _ {\alpha}\ fr ac{ r _ {\ alpha}^{(1) } r _ {\a lpha} ^{( 2 )}}{e^ {2q_ la}-r_{\alpha}^{( 1 )}r_{\alpha}^{ (2)} } . 
\l abe l {eq3 }$ $ Here $k_B$ i s t he B oltzmann  c onstant, $T =300\,$K  i s  thelabora tory t emperat u r e, $k_{\b ot}$  is  the proj ect io n  of the  w av e  vecto r on  a  plana r stru c ture , $q_l^2=k
_0$ (22_repetitions). In_these cases 20 and_22 force-distance_relations_were obtained,_the_mean force gradients_were computed and_their total experimental errors_were determined at_a_67% confidence level as a combination of random and systematic errors (see Ref. [@27] for_details)._In Fig. \[fg2\](a,b)_the_mean_gradients of the Casimir force_and their errors measured for_the first_sample with applied compensating voltage are shown as_crosses_with a step_of 1nm. Table  1 presents the values of mean_$F^{\prime}(a)$ at several separations measured in_the two different_ways_for_the first (columns a,b)_and second (columns c,d) samples. As_can be seen in Table 1, the_measurement results for the two graphene samples_obtained in two different ways are_in very good mutual agreement.

Now_we compare_the experimental results with theoretical_predictions. At the_moment there_is no theory_allowing rigorous calculation of the Casimir_force between a_graphene deposited on a Si-SiO${}_2$ substrate_and_an Au sphere._The_problem_is that_Si and SiO${}_2$_layers_are described_by_their dielectric permittivities and the reflection_properties_of graphene in the Dirac model are_described by the polarization_tensor._This does not allow_direct application of the Lifshitz_theory for layered structures [@23; @30]._Because of_this, here_we restrict ourselves to the approximate approach, where the contributions of_Si-SiO${}_2$ substrate and graphene sheet to_the Casimir interaction with_an Au_sphere_are computed separately_using_the Lifshitz_theory and are then added together. In_the framework_of the proximity force approximation (PFA),_the Lifshitz formula for_the_gradient of the Casimir force between_an Au sphere and any planar_structure takes the form $$F^{\prime}(a)=2k_BTR\sum_{l=0}^{\infty}{\vphantom{\sum}}^{\prime}
\!\!\int_{0}^{\infty}\!\!\!\!
q_lk_{\bot}dk_{\bot}\sum_{\alpha}
\frac{r_{\alpha}^{(1)}r_{\alpha}^{(2)}}{e^{2q_la}-r_{\alpha}^{(1)}r_{\alpha}^{(2)}}.
\label{eq3}$$_Here_$k_B$_is the Boltzmann constant, $T=300\,$K_is the laboratory temperature, $k_{\bot}$ is_the projection of_the wave vector on a planar structure,_$q_l^2=k