" points on $C$, instead choose $Z$ to consist of 192 general points on $C$ and one general point of $\lambda$. The first difference of the Hilbert function of $Z$ is

  deg             0   1   2   3    4    5    6    7    8    9    10   11                                                     
  -------------- --- --- --- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
  $\Delta h_Z$    1   3   6   10   15   20   24   27   29   29   29   0                                                      

Note that this is exactly the same as what we would have if we had taken 193 general points of $C$. Again, $r_2(R/I_Z) = 8$. The base locus of $(I_C)_{9}$ and $(I_C)_{10}$ is exactly the non-reduced and reducible curve of degree 29 mentioned in Example \[not decr type\], so the Hilbert function of $Z$ is the truncation of the Hilbert function given above. And by the general choice of the points, this will continue to be true regardless of which subsets we take. Hence $Z$ has UPP and satisfies $\Delta h_Z(d) = \Delta h_Z(d+1) = s$ for some $d >
r_2(R/I_Z)$, but not all of the points of $Z$ lie on one reduced and irreducible component of the curve of degree $s$ obtained by our result (since one point lies on the non-reduced component).

[\[Ahn-Migliore\] Example 5.9\]]{} \[two sextics\] We produced Example \[not irred\] by taking almost all of the points on $C$, and just one off of $C$ (in fact, it was on $\lambda$). In this example we show a surprising instance where half of the points of $V$ are on one irreducible component and the other half are on another irreducible component, but we still have UPP. We again omit some of the technical details.

Let $Q$ be a smooth quadric surface in $\mathbb P^3$, and as usual by abuse of notation we use the same letter $Q$ to denote the quadratic form defining this surface. Let $C_1$ be a [*general*]{}
" points on $ C$, instead choose $ Z$ to consist of 192 general period on $ C$ and one cosmopolitan point of $ \lambda$. The first remainder of the Hilbert routine of $ Z$ is 

   deg              0    1    2    3     4     5     6     7     8     9     10    11                                                     
   -------------- --- --- --- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 
   $ \Delta h_Z$     1    3    6    10    15    20    24    27    29    29    29    0                                                      

 Note that this is exactly the like as what we would have if we had taken 193 general points of $ C$. Again, $ r_2(R / I_Z) = 8$. The foundation locus of $ (I_C)_{9}$ and $ (I_C)_{10}$ is exactly the non - decreased and reducible curve of degree 29 mentioned in Example   \[not decr type\ ], so the Hilbert function of $ Z$ is the shortness of the Hilbert function given above. And by the cosmopolitan choice of the point, this will proceed to be true regardless of which subsets we take. therefore $ Z$ has UPP and satisfies $ \Delta h_Z(d) = \Delta h_Z(d+1) = s$ for some $ d > 
 r_2(R / I_Z)$, but not all of the points of $ Z$ lie on one decreased and irreducible component of the bend of degree $ s$ receive by our result (since one point lies on the non - decreased component). 

 [ \[Ahn - Migliore\ ] Example 5.9\ ] ] { } \[two sextics\ ] We produced Example \[not irred\ ] by taking almost all of the points on $ C$, and just one off of $ C$ (in fact, it was on $ \lambda$). In this example we show a surprising instance where half of the points of $ V$ are on one irreducible component and the other half are on another irreducible component, but we still have UPP. We again exclude some of the technical details. 

 Let $ Q$ be a placid quadric open in $ \mathbb P^3 $, and as usual by abuse of notation we practice the same letter $ Q$ to announce the quadratic form defining this surface. lease $ C_1 $ be a [ * general * ] { }
" polnts on $C$, instead choose $Z$ to consist oy 192 genecal poihts on $C$ and one general point of $\lalbea$. Tht first difference uf the Hipbert fubctiib of $Z$ is

  deg             0   1   2   3    4    5    6    7    8    9    10   11                                                     
  -------------- --- --- --- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
  $\Delta h_Z$    1   3   6   10   15   20   24   27   29   29   29   0                                                      

Notq that this ir exactly uhz same as wgat we would have if we had takdn 193 gzneral poinjs ov $C$. Again, $r_2(R/M_Z) = 8$. Tre base locus of $(I_C)_{9}$ dnd $(I_C)_{10}$ os exactly the noi-redyced and reducible cucve of degree 29 mentijned in Efajple \[not decr type\], si the Hiltert dunztikn or $Z$ is thx truncatioh of the Hiobert function givem wvove. And by tge genqrwl choice of the points, this will contitue to be true regardless if which subsets we twke. Hence $Z$ has UPP and satisfies $\Delta h_Z(d) = \Delta h_Z(d+1) = s$ xor skoe $b >
r_2(R/I_Z)$, vuh not all of the points of $Z$ lie on one reducqs snc irreducible gomponent of the cirge jf degree $s$ octaineb bg our result (since one poynt lues on tht non-teduced component).

[\[Ahn-Migliorw\] Example 5.9\]]{} \[tco wextics\] We produceb Example \[noc irrec\] by yaking almost all of thz poinfs on $C$, and just one uff of $C$ (in fact, it wds on $\lambda$). In this exampje we shox a sbrprisine inxtance where halv of bve points of $V$ are on oue irseducible fomponent and the other half arx on another orsedlcible coiponekt, but we still have UPP. We ayain omic some of the tebhnical dxtails.

Let $Q$ fe a smooth qgwdric surfacx in $\mathfb P^3$, and as usuxu by abuse of motation ct use the wame letter $Q$ to dcnote fhe quadratic firm defining this xurwacq. Pev $C_1$ bq a [*general*]{}
" points on $C$, instead choose $Z$ of general points $C$ and one first of the Hilbert of $Z$ is 0 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 9 10 11 -------------- --- --- --- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- $\Delta h_Z$ 1 3 6 10 15 20 24 27 29 29 29 0 that this is exactly the same as what would have if we taken 193 general points of Again, = 8$. base of and $(I_C)_{10}$ is the non-reduced and reducible curve of degree 29 mentioned in Example \[not decr type\], so the Hilbert of $Z$ truncation of Hilbert given And by the of the points, this will continue regardless of which subsets we take. Hence $Z$ UPP and $\Delta h_Z(d) = \Delta h_Z(d+1) = for some $d > r_2(R/I_Z)$, but not all the points of $Z$ lie on one reduced and irreducible component of the curve of obtained by our result one point lies the component). Example \[two sextics\] produced Example \[not irred\] by taking almost all of the points $C$, and just one off of $C$ (in fact, it $\lambda$). this example we a surprising instance where of points of $V$ are irreducible and are another component, but we still UPP. We again omit some the technical details. Let surface in $\mathbb P^3$, and as usual by of notation we use the same letter to denote the quadratic form defining this surface. Let $C_1$ be a
" points on $C$, instead choose $Z$ to Consist of 192 gEneraL poIntS oN $C$ anD one General point of $\LAmbdA$. The first difference of tHe HilBeRT funCTiOn of $Z$ Is

  deg             0   1   2   3    4    5    6    7    8    9    10   11                                                     
  -------------- --- --- --- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
  $\DeLTa H_z$    1   3   6   10   15   20   24   27   29   29   29   0                                                      

notE tHaT thIs IS eXactlY thE same as What we woulD haVe If we had taken 193 GEnEral points Of $C$. again, $r_2(R/I_Z) = 8$. The BasE locus Of $(i_C)_{9}$ aND $(I_C)_{10}$ is ExaCtly tHe non-rEDuced aNd reducibLe CUrve of DEgree 29 meNTIoNed iN Example \[not decr tyPE\], sO The Hilbert funcTion of $z$ iS ThE TRunCatIon of the HiLbErt fuNCtion giVEn ABOVe. AND by the general Choice of the POinTs, this WiLl cONtinue To be tRuE RegArdless of whIch sUbsets we tAke. HenCE $Z$ has UPp And satiSfies $\DEltA h_Z(D) = \DelTA h_z(d+1) = S$ foR sOMe $d >
R_2(r/I_z)$, buT Not All of the PoInTs of $Z$ Lie oN ONE ReduCed And iRreduCible componenT of The cURve Of degRee $s$ oBtaiNeD by ouR resulT (sincE oNe point lies on thE non-Reduced coMpoNeNt).

[\[AHn-migliORe\] ExamPle 5.9\]]{} \[Two Sextics\] we produCEd EXaMPLE \[nOt irred\] by taking almOsT ALl Of the poiNts on $C$, ANd JuST one off oF $C$ (In fAct, iT WAs on $\lAmbdA$). in This examPle we sHOw A sUrprisiNg InstanCe WheRe hAlf of THe poInts of $v$ are on onE irreDUcible componenT And the other haLF aRE On ANothEr iRreducible cOmpoNEnt, bUt we STiLl hAVe UPP. we agaIn OMiT Some of the technical dEtAils.

LeT $Q$ be a Smooth quadric Surface in $\mATHBb P^3$, and as UsuaL By ABuse of notation We use The same letTEr $Q$ to denOte thE quadratIc form defINIng this sUrfAce. let $c_1$ be A [*GEnEral*]{}
" points on $C$, instead c hoose $Z$to co nsi stof  192  gen eral points on $C$and one general pointof $\ la m bda$ .  T he fi rst dif f er e n ceof  t heHi l be rt fu nct ion of$Z$ is

 deg             0  1   2   3  4    5    6  7    8    9    10   11                                       
  ----------- - -- --- --- --- -- -- --- -- -- - --- - - --- ---- - -- - --- -  ---- - -  - - - - - -  -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- ---- ----  -- --
  $ \Delt ah _Z$     1   3  6  10   15  20 24   27   29  29   2 9  0                               

No tethat  this  is exactly t hesame aswhatwe wo uldha ve if  we ha d tak en  193 general po ints  of $C$.Aga in , $ r_ 2(R/I _ Z) = 8 $.The  base l ocus of $(I _C ) _ { 9} $ and $(I_C)_{10}$  i s ex actly th e non- r ed uc e d and re du cib le c u r ve of  deg r ee  29 ment ionedi nEx ample \ [n ot dec rtyp e\] , sot he H ilbert  functio n of$ Z$ is the trun c ation of theH il b e rt func tio n given abo ve.A nd b y th e  g ene r al ch oiceof th e  points, this willco ntinue  to b e true regard less of wh i c h  subsets  wet ak e . Hence $Z$ ha s UPP  and satis f ies $\De lta h _Z(d) =\Delta h_ Z ( d+1) = s $ f orsom e $ d >r_2(R/I_Z)$,b u t no tall ofthe  points  of  $Z $ l ieon  one redu ced andir re du ci ble  comp o nent ofth e c ur veof de g ree $s $ obt aine dby our  result (s i n ce o ne  p oint  li es  on t he n o n-r educedcomponent ).[\[A hn -M igliore \] Example 5. 9\ ]]{} \[two  s ext ics\]W e  produce d Example \[not irred\] by taki ngalmos t al l of thepoi nts on  $C $ , andjust o ne of fof$ C $ (in f ac t,it  was on $\ l a mbd a$).In  thi s examp le we show a surpr i sin g instance wh ere  hal f of  th e  p o int so f $ V $  are on one irr educible c om p on ent and th e  ot he r halfare onanoth e r irred ucible co mponent,bu t we s til l have UPP . We aga in omit s o me of th e tec hni cal de ta ils .

Le t $Q$b e a  smoo th qua dr ic sur facein  $\mathb b P^3$, and as usual by  abuse  of n ota tion we u set hesame lett er $ Q$ to deno tethe  quad rat i c for m de f in ing thissurf a ce. Let $ C _1 $ b e a[*general*] { } 
" points_on $C$,_instead choose $Z$ to_consist of_192_general points_on_$C$ and one_general point of_$\lambda$. The first difference_of the Hilbert_function_of $Z$ is

  deg         __ _0__ 1   2_  3  _ 4_   5    6__  7_   8    9 _  10   11_  ___   _     _     _      _     _    _ _    _  _ _ 
 _-------------- --- --- --- ---- ----_---- ---- ----_---- ---- ---- ---- -- --_--_-- -- --_--_--_-- --_-- -- --_--_-- --_--_--
  $\Delta h_Z$  __1   3   6_  10 __15   20_  24  _27   29  _29 _ 29_  0        _     _   _ __  __ _      _ _     _   __     _

Note that this is exactly the_same as what we would_have_if_we had taken 193 general_points of $C$. Again, $r_2(R/I_Z) =_8$. The base_locus of $(I_C)_{9}$ and $(I_C)_{10}$ is exactly_the_non-reduced and reducible curve of degree_29_mentioned in Example \[not decr type\], so_the_Hilbert_function of $Z$ is the_truncation of the Hilbert function given_above. And by the general choice of the points,_this will continue_to be true regardless of_which_subsets_we take. Hence $Z$ has UPP and satisfies $\Delta h_Z(d)_= \Delta_h_Z(d+1) = s$_for some $d >
r_2(R/I_Z)$, but not all of the points_of $Z$ lie on one reduced and_irreducible component of the curve of degree $s$ obtained by our_result (since one point lies on the non-reduced_component).

[\[Ahn-Migliore\] Example 5.9\]]{} \[two sextics\] We produced_Example \[not irred\] by_taking_almost all of the points on $C$,_and_just_one_off of $C$_(in fact, it_was on $\lambda$)._In this_example we show_a surprising_instance where half_of_the points of $V$ are on one irreducible component and the other half are on another irreducible component,_but we still have UPP. We_again omit some of the_technical_details.

Let $Q$ be_a smooth quadric surface_in $\mathbb P^3$, and as usual by abuse_of notation we use the same letter $Q$ to_denote_the quadratic_form defining this surface._Let $C_1$_be a_[*general*]{}