 dedicated to the proof of Theorem \[theoremPerturbedDelaunay\].

The ${\mathcal{C}}^2$-regularity of $\xi_t$ essentially means that $C_t(z)$ is ${\mathcal{C}}^2$ with respect to $(t,z)$. Together with the ${\mathcal{C}}^2$-regularity of $\phi_t$, it implies that $\Phi_t$ is ${\mathcal{C}}^2$ with respect to $(t,z)$. Thus, ${\mathcal{M}}(\Phi_t)$ is also ${\mathcal{C}}^2$ with respect to $t$. These regularities and the fact that there exists a solution $\Phi_t$ solving the monodromy problem are used in Section \[sectionPropertyXit\] to deduce an essential piece of information about the potential $\xi_t$ (Proposition \[propC3\]). This step then allows us to write in Section \[sectionzAP\] the holomorphic frame $\Phi_t$ in a $Mz^AP$ form given by the Fröbenius method (Proposition \[propzAP1\]), and to gauge this expression, in order to gain an order of convergence with respect to $z$ (Proposition \[propzAP2\]). During this process, the holomorphic frame will loose one order of regularity with respect to $t$, which is why Theorem \[theoremPerturbedDelaunay\] asks for a ${\mathcal{C}}^2$-regularity of the data. Section \[sectionDressedDelaunayFrames\] is devoted to the study of dressed Delaunay frames $Mz^A$ in order to ensure that the immersions $f_t$ will converge to Delaunay immersions as $t$ tends to $0$, and to estimate the growth of their unitary part around the end at $z=0$. Section \[sectionConvergenceImmersions\] proves that these immersions do converge, which is the first point of Theorem \[theoremPerturbedDelaunay\]. Before proving the embeddedness in Section \[sectionEmbeddedness\], Section \[sectionConvergenceNormales\] is devoted to the convergence of the normal maps. Finally, we compute the limit axes in Section \[sectionLimitAxis\].

A property of $\xi_t$ {#sectionPropertyXit}
---------------------

We begin by diagonalising $A_t$ in a unitary basis (Proposition \[propDiagA\]) in order simplify the computations in Proposition
dedicated to the proof of Theorem \[theoremPerturbedDelaunay\ ]. 

 The $ { \mathcal{C}}^2$-regularity of $ \xi_t$ essentially means that $ C_t(z)$ is $ { \mathcal{C}}^2 $ with obedience to $ (t, z)$. in concert with the $ { \mathcal{C}}^2$-regularity of $ \phi_t$, it implies that $ \Phi_t$ is $ { \mathcal{C}}^2 $ with respect to $ (t, z)$. therefore, $ { \mathcal{M}}(\Phi_t)$ is also $ { \mathcal{C}}^2 $ with regard to $ t$. These regularities and the fact that there exist a solution $ \Phi_t$ resolve the monodromy problem are used in Section \[sectionPropertyXit\ ] to deduce an essential objet d'art of information about the potential $ \xi_t$ (Proposition \[propC3\ ]). This footprint then admit us to write in Section \[sectionzAP\ ] the holomorphic frame $ \Phi_t$ in a $ Mz^AP$ form given by the Fröbenius method (suggestion \[propzAP1\ ]), and to gauge this expression, in order to reach an order of convergence with respect to $ z$ (Proposition \[propzAP2\ ]). During this process, the holomorphic human body will loose one order of regularity with respect to $ t$, which is why Theorem \[theoremPerturbedDelaunay\ ] asks for a $ { \mathcal{C}}^2$-regularity of the data. incision \[sectionDressedDelaunayFrames\ ] is devoted to the study of dressed Delaunay frames $ Mz^A$ in order to ensure that the immersions $ f_t$ will converge to Delaunay immersions as $ t$ tends to $ 0 $, and to estimate the growth of their unitary part around the end at $ z=0$. Section \[sectionConvergenceImmersions\ ] proves that these immersions do converge, which is the first detail of Theorem \[theoremPerturbedDelaunay\ ]. Before proving the embeddedness in Section \[sectionEmbeddedness\ ], Section \[sectionConvergenceNormales\ ] is devote to the convergence of the normal maps. Finally, we compute the terminus ad quem axes in Section \[sectionLimitAxis\ ]. 

 A place of $ \xi_t$ { # sectionPropertyXit } 
 --------------------- 

 We begin by diagonalising $ A_t$ in a unitary footing (Proposition \[propDiagA\ ]) in order simplify the computations in Proposition
 deficated to the proof of Uheorem \[theoremPettyrbedDxlaunay\].

Fhe ${\mathzal{C}}^2$-regularity of $\xi_t$ essentmallt meabs that $C_t(z)$ is ${\mathcal{Z}}^2$ with redpect to $(t,z)$. Uogether with the ${\mathcal{G}}^2$-xegulzvity mh $\phi_t$, it impligs that $\Phi_t$ is ${\mathcal{C}}^2$ whtf xespect to $(t,z)$. Thus, ${\mathcal{M}}(\Phi_t)$ is ajso ${\matncwl{C}}^2$ with respest tp $t$. Tgvst regularities and the fact that fhere eqists a solution $\Lhi_t$ solving the monodromy prohlem are used in Sfction \[sectuonPwipertyXit\] to deduce an essential pjece of information about the putentnal $\xi_t$ (Prokoaihhon \[propC3\]). Tiis stvp then allows us to frite im Section \[sectlonzA'\] thw holomorphic frame $\Pii_t$ in a $Mz^AP$ form gyven by tve Fröbenius method (Priposijion \[[ropxQP1\]), xnd tp fauge hhia expressikn, in order to gain an order og sinvergence wifh res[est to $z$ (Proposition \[propzAP2\]). During this prkcess, the holomorphic feame will loose one otder of redularity with respect to $t$, which is why Theorem \[tveorejOeruuvnedDdoaknay\] asks for a ${\mathcal{C}}^2$-regularity of the datw. Stctpon \[sectionDressebDelaunayFrames\] os drdoted to the rtudy of sressed Delaunay fgames $Me^A$ in irder to tnsurr that the immersions $f_t$ wiol converge no Dwlaunay immersions as $t$ tends to $0$, and yo estimate the growth uf tgeir unitarj part arkjnd the end at $z=0$. Sebtiot \[sectionConvergenceImmersyons\] provxs thct these immgrsions do converhe, whlwh is the first polnt oy Themrem \[theorfmPerturbedDelaunay\]. Before provmig the embeddgdnass in Sectnon \[segtionEmbeddednefs\], Section \[secjionConvexgenceVormales\] ia devotxd to the cogvergence of dje normal ma's. Finallr, we compute thd limit axes in Section \[sectionLimutAxis\].

A property on $\xi_t$ {#aectionPropertyRnt}
---------------------

Qe begin by diabonxlifijg $A_e$ in a unitarf baris (Lroporition \[kxopBixgA\]) on order simplify tha cojputations in Proppsltion
dedicated to the proof of Theorem \[theoremPerturbedDelaunay\]. of essentially means $C_t(z)$ is ${\mathcal{C}}^2$ with ${\mathcal{C}}^2$-regularity of $\phi_t$, implies that $\Phi_t$ ${\mathcal{C}}^2$ with respect to $(t,z)$. Thus, is also ${\mathcal{C}}^2$ with respect to $t$. These regularities and the fact that exists a solution $\Phi_t$ solving the monodromy problem are used in Section \[sectionPropertyXit\] deduce essential of about the potential $\xi_t$ (Proposition \[propC3\]). This step then allows us to write in Section \[sectionzAP\] holomorphic frame $\Phi_t$ in a $Mz^AP$ form given the Fröbenius method (Proposition and to gauge this expression, order gain an of with to $z$ (Proposition During this process, the holomorphic frame will loose one order of regularity with respect to $t$, which why Theorem for a of data. \[sectionDressedDelaunayFrames\] is devoted study of dressed Delaunay frames $Mz^A$ ensure that the immersions $f_t$ will converge to immersions as tends to $0$, and to estimate growth of their unitary part around the end $z=0$. Section \[sectionConvergenceImmersions\] proves that these immersions do converge, which is the first point of Before proving the embeddedness Section \[sectionEmbeddedness\], Section is to convergence the normal Finally, we compute the limit axes in Section \[sectionLimitAxis\]. A property $\xi_t$ {#sectionPropertyXit} --------------------- We begin by diagonalising $A_t$ in a (Proposition in order simplify computations in Proposition
 dedicated to the proof of TheoRem \[theorempertuRbeDDeLaUnay\].

the ${\mAthcal{C}}^2$-regularITy of $\Xi_t$ essentially means thaT $C_t(z)$ iS ${\mAThcaL{c}}^2$ wIth reSpect to $(T,Z)$. TOGEthEr WiTh tHe ${\MAtHcal{C}}^2$-RegUlarity Of $\phi_t$, it imPliEs That $\Phi_t$ is ${\maTHcAl{C}}^2$ with resPecT to $(t,z)$. Thus, ${\matHcaL{M}}(\Phi_t)$ Is AlsO ${\MathcAl{C}}^2$ With rEspect TO $t$. ThesE regulariTiES and thE Fact thaT THeRe exIsts a solution $\Phi_t$ SOlVIng the monodromY problEm ARe USEd iN SeCtion \[sectiOnpropeRTyXit\] to DEdUCE An eSSential piece oF informatioN AboUt the pOtEntIAl $\xi_t$ (PRoposItIOn \[pRopC3\]). This steP theN allows us To writE In SectiON \[sectioNzAP\] thE hoLomOrphIC fRaMe $\PHi_T$ In a $mZ^Ap$ foRM giVen by the frÖbEnius MethOD (pROposItiOn \[prOpzAP1\]), And to gauge thiS exPresSIon, In ordEr to gAin aN oRder oF conveRgencE wIth respect to $z$ (PrOposItion \[propZAP2\]). duRinG tHis prOCess, thE hoLomOrphic fRame wilL LooSe ONE OrDer of regularity witH rESPeCt to $t$, whiCh is whY thEoREm \[theoreMPErtUrbeDdElaunAy\] asKS fOr a ${\mathcAl{C}}^2$-regULaRiTy of the DaTa. SectIoN \[seCtiOnDreSSedDElaunaYFrames\] iS devoTEd to the study of DRessed DelaunaY FrAMEs $mZ^A$ in OrdEr to ensure tHat tHE immErsiONs $F_t$ wILl conVerge To dElAUnay immersions as $t$ teNdS to $0$, and To estImate the growtH of their unITARy part arOund THe ENd at $z=0$. Section \[seCtionconvergencEimmersioNs\] proVes that tHese immerSIOns do conVerGe, wHicH is THE fIrst point of ThEORem \[tHeOremPerTurBedDelaUnaY\]. BeForE prOvIng the embEddednesS iN SEcTiOn \[sEctioNembeddedNeSs\], SEcTioN \[sectIOnConvErgenCeNoRmAlES\] is Devoted TO tHE ConvErGeNce oF thE nOrmal Maps. fInaLly, we coMpute the lImiT Axes In seCtion \[seCtionLimitAxiS\].

A Property of $\Xi_T$ {#seCtionPROPertyXit}
---------------------

we begin by diagonalising $A_T$ In a unitAry Basis (propOsition \[prOpDIagA\]) in OrdER simplIfy the CompuTaTioNS In ProPOSiTioN
 dedicated to the proof of  Theorem \ [theo rem Per tu rbed Dela unay\].

The $ { \mat hcal{C}}^2$-regularity  of $ \x i _t$e ss entia lly mea n st h at$C _t (z) $i s${\ma thc al{C}}^ 2$ with re spe ct  to $(t,z)$. To gether wit h t he ${\mathca l{C }}^2$- re gul a rityof$\phi _t$, i t  impli es that $ \P h i_t$ i s  ${\mat h c al {C}} ^2$ with respectt o$ (t,z)$. Thus,${\mat hc a l{ M } }(\ Phi _t)$ is al so  ${\m a thcal{C } }^ 2 $ wit h  respect to $ t$. These r e gul aritie sand the fa ct th at the re exists a  sol ution $\P hi_t$s olvingt he mono dromypro ble m ar e  u se d i nS ect i on  \[ s ect ionPrope rt yX it\]to d e d u c e an  es sent ial p iece of infor mat iona bou t the  pote ntia l$\xi_ t$ (Pr oposi ti on \[propC3\]).  Thi s step th enal low sus to writeinSec tion \[ section z AP\ ]t h e  h olomorphic frame $ \P h i _t $ in a $ Mz^AP$ fo rm given by  t heFröb e n ius m etho d  ( Proposit ion \[ p ro pz AP1\]),  a nd toga uge  th is ex p ress ion, i n orderto ga i n an order ofc onvergence wi t hr e sp e ct t o $ z$ (Proposi tion \[pr opzA P 2\ ]). Durin g thi sp ro c ess, the holomorphi cframewillloose one ord er of regu l a r ity with  res p ec t  to $t$, which  is w hy Theorem \[theore mPert urbedDel aunay\] a s k s for a${\ mat hca l{C } } ^2 $-regularityo f  the  d ata. Se cti on \[se cti onD res sed De launayFra mes\] is  d ev ot ed  to  thes tudy ofdr ess ed  De launa y  frame s $Mz ^A$in  o r der  to ens u re t hatth eimme rsi on s $f_ t$ w i llconverg e to Dela una y  imm er si ons as$t$ tends to$0 $, and toes tim ate th e growth o f their unitary part ar o und the  en d at$z=0 $. Sectio n \ [secti onC o nverge nceImm ersio ns \]p r ovest h at  th es e immersio n s  do  conv er ge,which i s the first pointo f T heorem \[theo rem Pert u r be dDe l au n ay\ ]. Bef o r e proving the e mbeddednes si nSection \[ s ect io nEmbedd edness\ ], Se c tion \[ sectionCo nvergence No rmal e s \]is devoted  to theconvergen c e oft he  norm almaps.Fi nal ly, w e comp u tethe l imit a xe s in S ectio n\[sectio nLimitAxis\].

A proper ty of$\xi_ t${#section Pro p ert yXit}
--- ---- ---------- --- -
We be gin by di agon a li sin g  $A_t $ in a unitary ba sis ( Pr oposition \ [ p r opD iagA\ ])i n orde r si mplify the comput a tions in Propo siti o n 
 dedicated_to the_proof of Theorem \[theoremPerturbedDelaunay\].

The_${\mathcal{C}}^2$-regularity of_$\xi_t$_essentially means_that_$C_t(z)$ is ${\mathcal{C}}^2$_with respect to_$(t,z)$. Together with the_${\mathcal{C}}^2$-regularity of $\phi_t$,_it_implies that $\Phi_t$ is ${\mathcal{C}}^2$ with respect to $(t,z)$. Thus, ${\mathcal{M}}(\Phi_t)$ is also ${\mathcal{C}}^2$_with_respect to_$t$._These_regularities and the fact that_there exists a solution $\Phi_t$_solving the_monodromy problem are used in Section \[sectionPropertyXit\] to_deduce_an essential piece_of information about the potential $\xi_t$ (Proposition \[propC3\]). This_step then allows us to write_in Section \[sectionzAP\]_the_holomorphic_frame $\Phi_t$ in a_$Mz^AP$ form given by the Fröbenius_method (Proposition \[propzAP1\]), and to gauge_this expression, in order to gain an_order of convergence with respect to_$z$ (Proposition \[propzAP2\]). During this_process, the_holomorphic frame will loose one_order of regularity_with respect_to $t$, which_is why Theorem \[theoremPerturbedDelaunay\] asks for_a ${\mathcal{C}}^2$-regularity of_the data. Section \[sectionDressedDelaunayFrames\] is devoted_to_the study of_dressed_Delaunay_frames $Mz^A$_in order to_ensure_that the_immersions_$f_t$ will converge to Delaunay immersions_as_$t$ tends to $0$, and to estimate_the growth of their_unitary_part around the end_at $z=0$. Section \[sectionConvergenceImmersions\] proves_that these immersions do converge, which_is the_first point_of Theorem \[theoremPerturbedDelaunay\]. Before proving the embeddedness in Section \[sectionEmbeddedness\], Section_\[sectionConvergenceNormales\] is devoted to the convergence_of the normal maps._Finally, we_compute_the limit axes_in_Section \[sectionLimitAxis\].

A_property of $\xi_t$ {#sectionPropertyXit}
---------------------

We begin by diagonalising_$A_t$ in_a unitary basis (Proposition \[propDiagA\]) in_order simplify the computations_in_Proposition