'^2 (Z'+1) \left( \frac{\alpha_d}{10^{-2}}\right)^2 \left( \frac{\mu_d}{{\rm MeV}} \right)
\left( \frac{{\rm GeV}}{m_{p_d} + Z'm_{e_d}}\right)\left( \frac{220 {\rm \ km/s}}{v_{rot}}\right)^2 \ll 1 \.
\label{2x}\end{aligned}$$

Of course with the dark photon massless this type of dark matter is dissipative. The plasma halo can radiatively cool via processes such as dark bremsstrahlung and potentially collapse onto a disk on a timescale less than the Hubble time. Thus, there is another condition for such a plasma to exist today, namely that the cooling timescale is longer than the Hubble time, or that a heating mechanism exists. The cooling timescale is given in e.g. [@rich8] and requiring that this timescale be longer than the Hubble time for the Milky Way gives the approximate condition $$\begin{aligned}
m_{p_d} \gtrsim  20 \left( \frac{{\rm MeV}}{m_{e_d}} \right) \left( \frac{\alpha_d}{10^{-2}}\right)^2 
Z'^{5/3} \  {\rm GeV}
\.
%{\frac{5}{3}}
\label{3x}\end{aligned}$$ This was derived assuming that cooling is dominated by bremsstrahlung for the most stringent case of $m_{e_d} \ll m_{p_d}$. The alternative possibility is that the cooling rate is sufficiently high for the halo to have collapsed but is prevented from doing so due to heating [@sph; @rich8; @footexploredb; @footexploredc; @footexploredd; @footexplorede]. If $\epsilon \sim 10^{-9}$–$10^{-10}$ then sufficient heating of the halo can be provided by ordinary core-collapse supernovae [@sph; @rich8]. In that scenario, the halo is viewed as a dynamical object which evolves until an equilibrium configuration is reached where heating and cooling rates locally balance.

The conditions so far have been derived assuming that interactions were sufficiently rapid so that dark electrons and dark protons have approximately the same temperature. Let us briefly estimate the parameter space where this assumption is reasonable. If the mean
' ^2 (Z'+1) \left (\frac{\alpha_d}{10^{-2}}\right)^2 \left (\frac{\mu_d}{{\rm MeV } } \right) 
 \left (\frac{{\rm GeV}}{m_{p_d } + Z'm_{e_d}}\right)\left (\frac{220 { \rm \ km / s}}{v_{rot}}\right)^2 \ll 1 \. 
 \label{2x}\end{aligned}$$ 

 Of course with the dark photon massless this type of dark topic is dissipative. The plasma aura can radiatively cool via processes such as dark bremsstrahlung and potentially crack up onto a magnetic disk on a timescale less than the Hubble time. Thus, there be another circumstance for such a plasma to exist today, namely that the cooling timescale is longer than the Hubble time, or that a heating mechanism exists. The cool timescale is given in e.g. [ @rich8 ] and command that this timescale be longer than the Hubble time for the Milky Way gives the approximate condition $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 m_{p_d } \gtrsim   20 \left (\frac{{\rm MeV}}{m_{e_d } } \right) \left (\frac{\alpha_d}{10^{-2}}\right)^2 
 Z'^{5/3 } \   { \rm GeV } 
 \. 
% { \frac{5}{3 } } 
 \label{3x}\end{aligned}$$ This was derived wear that cooling is dominated by bremsstrahlung for the most rigorous case of $ m_{e_d } \ll m_{p_d}$. The alternative hypothesis is that the cooling pace is sufficiently high for the halo to have collapsed but is prevented from doing so due to heating system [ @sph; @rich8; @footexploredb; @footexploredc; @footexploredd; @footexplorede ]. If $ \epsilon \sim 10^{-9}$–$10^{-10}$ then sufficient heating of the halo can be provided by ordinary core - collapse supernova [ @sph; @rich8 ]. In that scenario, the aura is viewed as a dynamical object which evolves until an equilibrium configuration is reached where heating and cooling rate locally balance. 

 The conditions indeed far have been derive assuming that interactions were sufficiently rapid so that dark electron and dark proton have approximately the same temperature. Let us concisely estimate the parameter space where this assumption is reasonable. If the mean
'^2 (Z'+1) \peft( \frac{\alpha_d}{10^{-2}}\right)^2 \lefu( \frac{\mu_d}{{\rm MeV}} \rntht)
\lefv( \frac{{\rj GeV}}{m_{p_d} + Z'm_{e_d}}\right)\left( \frac{220 {\rm \ km/s}}{t_{rot}}\eight)^2 \ll 1 \.
\label{2x}\end{aligned}$$

Ow course aith the darj photon massless tmns tylc of back matter is dixsipative. Dhe plasma halm zau radiatively cool via processes sucr as datk bremsstrahlund anc potsntially collapse onto a disk on a timescele less than tne Hubble time. Thus, there ls ajother condition flr such a poasmw to exist toaay, namely that the cokling timescale is longer than ghe Hbbble time, ir thwj a heating nechagism exists. Bne cooning tikescale is givcn in e.g. [@rich8] and requiring tiat this timescale bg longer tvau the Hubble time for tye Minky Fay euver tge alproxilatx condition $$\begin{alignwd}
m_{p_d} \gtrsim  20 \left( \fwqc{{\rm MeV}}{m_{e_d}} \rjght) \lqfe( \frac{\alpha_d}{10^{-2}}\right)^2 
Z'^{5/3} \  {\rm GeV}
\.
%{\frac{5}{3}}
\label{3x}\etd{amigned}$$ This was derived assuming that coolinh is domigated by bremsstrahlung for the most stringent cave of $o_{e_d} \lj n_{p_f}$. The alternative possibility is that the coojjnb gate is sufficienbly high for the hsll yj have collapred buc ia prevented from dling so due ro heatind [@spn; @rich8; @footexploredb; @footexploredc; @footvxpliredd; @footexploredz]. If $\epsilon \sim 10^{-9}$–$10^{-10}$ them sufficient heating of the halo can bf provides by ordinary cord-cokldpse suptfnovae [@sph; @rich8]. Ig that scxnarip, the hxlo os viered as a djnamigdl object which evllves uttil an eqkilibrium configuration is reacixd where heatonc atd cooliug ratcs locally balagce.

The conditipns so yar haxe been degived assnming that igteractions wate sufficientny rapid so rhat dark eudctrons and datk protons have appeoximately the samc temkedature. Let us bxnedly estimate thr pxraiener s[dce where thhs arsuoltion is reasonanle. If yhe mean
'^2 (Z'+1) \left( \frac{\alpha_d}{10^{-2}}\right)^2 \left( \frac{\mu_d}{{\rm MeV}} \frac{{\rm + Z'm_{e_d}}\right)\left( {\rm \ km/s}}{v_{rot}}\right)^2 course the dark photon this type of matter is dissipative. The plasma halo radiatively cool via processes such as dark bremsstrahlung and potentially collapse onto a on a timescale less than the Hubble time. Thus, there is another condition such plasma exist namely that the cooling timescale is longer than the Hubble time, or that a heating mechanism The cooling timescale is given in e.g. [@rich8] requiring that this timescale longer than the Hubble time the Way gives approximate $$\begin{aligned} \gtrsim 20 \left( MeV}}{m_{e_d}} \right) \left( \frac{\alpha_d}{10^{-2}}\right)^2 Z'^{5/3} \ {\rm GeV} \. %{\frac{5}{3}} \label{3x}\end{aligned}$$ This was derived assuming that cooling dominated by the most case $m_{e_d} m_{p_d}$. The alternative that the cooling rate is sufficiently halo to have collapsed but is prevented from so due heating [@sph; @rich8; @footexploredb; @footexploredc; @footexploredd; If $\epsilon \sim 10^{-9}$–$10^{-10}$ then sufficient heating of halo can be provided by ordinary core-collapse supernovae [@sph; @rich8]. In that scenario, the halo as a dynamical object evolves until an configuration reached heating cooling rates balance. The conditions so far have been derived assuming that interactions sufficiently rapid so that dark electrons and dark protons have same Let us briefly the parameter space where assumption reasonable. If the mean
'^2 (Z'+1) \left( \frac{\alpha_d}{10^{-2}}\right)^2 \left( \fRac{\mu_d}{{\rm Mev}} \righT)
\leFt( \fRaC{{\rm GEV}}{m_{p_D} + Z'm_{e_d}}\right)\left( \FRac{220 {\rM \ km/s}}{v_{rot}}\right)^2 \ll 1 \.
\label{2x}\eNd{aliGnED}$$

Of cOUrSe witH the darK PhOTOn mAsSlEss ThIS tYpe of DarK matter Is dissipatIve. thE plasma halo cAN rAdiatively CooL via processeS suCh as daRk BreMSstraHluNg and PotentIAlly coLlapse ontO a DIsk on a TImescalE LEsS thaN the Hubble time. ThuS, ThERe is another conDition FoR SuCH A plAsmA to exist toDaY, nameLY that thE CoOLINg tIMescale is longEr than the HuBBle Time, or ThAt a HEating MechaNiSM exIsts. The coolIng tImescale iS given IN e.g. [@rich8] ANd requiRing thAt tHis TimeSCaLe Be lOnGEr tHAn The hUbbLe time foR tHe milky way gIVES The aPprOximAte coNdition $$\begin{aLigNed}
m_{P_D} \gtRsim  20 \lEft( \frAc{{\rm mev}}{m_{e_d}} \rIght) \leFt( \fraC{\aLpha_d}{10^{-2}}\right)^2 
Z'^{5/3} \  {\rm Gev}
\.
%{\fraC{5}{3}}
\label{3x}\enD{alIgNed}$$ thIs was DErived AssUmiNg that cOoling iS DomInATED bY bremsstrahlung for ThE MOsT stringeNt case OF $m_{E_d} \LL m_{p_d}$. The aLtErnAtivE POssibIlitY Is That the cOoling RAtE iS sufficIeNtly hiGh For The Halo tO Have CollapSed but is PreveNTed from doing so DUe to heating [@spH; @RiCH8; @FoOTexpLorEdb; @footexplOredC; @FootExplOReDd; @fOOtexpLoredE]. IF $\EpSIlon \sim 10^{-9}$–$10^{-10}$ then sufficieNt HeatinG of thE halo can be proVided by ordINARy core-coLlapSE sUPernovae [@sph; @ricH8]. In thAt scenario, THe halo is VieweD as a dynaMical objeCT Which evoLveS unTil An eQUIlIbrium configuRATion Is Reached WheRe heatiNg aNd cOolIng RaTes locallY balance.

thE cOnDiTioNs so fAR have beeN dEriVeD asSuminG That inTeracTionS wErE SufFicientLY rAPId so ThAt Dark EleCtRons aNd daRK prOtons haVe approxiMatELy thE sAmE temperAture. Let us briEfLy estimate ThE paRameteR SPace wherE this assumption is reasonABle. If thE meAn
'^2 (Z'+1) \left( \frac{\a lpha_d}{10 ^{-2} }\r igh t) ^2 \ left ( \frac{\mu_d} { {\rm  MeV}} \right)
\left(\frac {{ \ rm G e V} }{m_{ p_d} +Z 'm _ { e_d }} \r igh t) \ le ft( \ fra c{220 { \rm \ km/s }}{ v_ {rot}}\right ) ^2  \ll 1 \.\la bel{2x}\end{ ali gned}$ $
Of cours e w ith t he dar k  photo n massles st his ty p e of da r k  m atte r is dissipative. Th e  plasma halo c an rad ia t iv e l y c ool  via proce ss es su c h as da r kb r e mss t rahlung and p otentiallyc oll apse o nt o a disk o n a t im e sca le less tha n th e Hubbletime.T hus, th e re is a nother  co ndi tion fo rsuc ha  pl a sm a t o  ex ist toda y,  n amely  tha t t h e co oli ng t imesc ale is longer  th an t h e H ubble  time , or  t hat a  heati ng me ch anism exists. T he c ooling ti mes ca leis  give n  in e. g.[@r ich8] a nd requ i rin gt h a tthis timescale belo n g er  than th e Hubb l eti m e for th eMil ky W a y  give s th e  a pproxima te con d it io n $$\be gi n{alig ne d}m_{ p_d}\ gtrs im  20  \left(\frac { {\rm MeV}}{m_{ e _d}} \right)\ le f t (\ frac {\a lpha_d}{10^ {-2} } \rig ht)^ 2  Z'^ { 5/3}\  {\ rm Ge V }
\.
%{\frac{5}{3}} 
\ label{ 3x}\e nd{aligned}$$  This wasd e r ived ass umin g  t h at cooling isdomin ated by br e msstrahl ung f or the m ost strin g e nt caseof$m_ {e_ d}\ l lm_{p_d}$. The a lter na tive po ssi bilityistha t t heco oling rat e is suf fi ci en tl y h igh f o r the ha lo  to  h ave  coll a psed b ut is  pre ve nt e d f rom doi n gs o  due  t oheat ing  [ @sph;  @ri c h8;  @foote xploredb;  @f o otex pl or edc; @f ootexploredd;  @ footexplor ed e].  If $\ e p silon \s im 10^{-9}$–$10^{-10}$t hen suf fic ientheat ing of th e h alo ca n b e  provi ded by  ordi na ryc o re-co l l ap sesu pernovae [ @ s ph;  @ric h8 ]. I n thatscenario, the halo isviewed as a d yna mica l ob jec t  w h ich  e v olv e s  until an equil ibrium con fi g ur ation is r e ach ed  whereheating  andc oolingrates loc ally bala nc e.
T h e c onditionsso far h ave beend erive d  a ssumi ngthat i nt era ction s were suf ficie ntly r ap id sothatda rk elect rons and dark protons h ave ap proxi mat ely the s ame tem perature.  Let  us briefl y e sti matethe param eter sp ace where  thi s  assumpti o nisr e as onable. Ift h e  me an
'^2 (Z'+1)_\left( \frac{\alpha_d}{10^{-2}}\right)^2_\left( \frac{\mu_d}{{\rm MeV}} \right)
\left(_\frac{{\rm GeV}}{m_{p_d}_+_Z'm_{e_d}}\right)\left( \frac{220_{\rm_\ km/s}}{v_{rot}}\right)^2 \ll_1 \.
\label{2x}\end{aligned}$$

Of course_with the dark photon_massless this type_of_dark matter is dissipative. The plasma halo can radiatively cool via processes such as_dark_bremsstrahlung and_potentially_collapse_onto a disk on a_timescale less than the Hubble_time. Thus,_there is another condition for such a plasma_to_exist today, namely_that the cooling timescale is longer than the Hubble_time, or that a heating mechanism_exists. The cooling_timescale_is_given in e.g. [@rich8]_and requiring that this timescale be_longer than the Hubble time for_the Milky Way gives the approximate condition_$$\begin{aligned}
m_{p_d} \gtrsim  20 \left( \frac{{\rm_MeV}}{m_{e_d}} \right) \left( \frac{\alpha_d}{10^{-2}}\right)^2 
Z'^{5/3}_\ _{\rm GeV}
\.
%{\frac{5}{3}}
\label{3x}\end{aligned}$$ This was derived_assuming that cooling_is dominated_by bremsstrahlung for_the most stringent case of $m_{e_d}_\ll m_{p_d}$. The_alternative possibility is that the cooling_rate_is sufficiently high_for_the_halo to_have collapsed but_is_prevented from_doing_so due to heating [@sph; @rich8;_@footexploredb;_@footexploredc; @footexploredd; @footexplorede]. If $\epsilon \sim 10^{-9}$–$10^{-10}$_then sufficient heating of_the_halo can be provided_by ordinary core-collapse supernovae [@sph;_@rich8]. In that scenario, the halo_is viewed_as a_dynamical object which evolves until an equilibrium configuration is reached where_heating and cooling rates locally balance.

The_conditions so far have_been derived_assuming_that interactions were_sufficiently_rapid so_that dark electrons and dark protons have_approximately the_same temperature. Let us briefly estimate_the parameter space where_this_assumption is reasonable. If the mean