 had successfully lead to BMS charges [@as] could not be applied here.\
It is then natural to attempt to work in the space $\Gamma \sim \cup_{\{ q \}} \Gamma^{q}$ off *all* radiative phase spaces on which $\G$ acts in a well defined manner. However we were so far lacking a symplectic structure on $\Gamma$. It is here that we turn to covariant phase space methods [@abr; @lw].

It is well known [@am] that the symplectic structure on $\Gamma^{q}$ corresponds to the GR covariant phase space symplectic structure $\Ocov$ evaluated at null infinity. Here we will show that $\Ocov$ naturally defines a symplectic structure on (a suitable subspace of) $\Gamma$. By realizing $\Gamma^{\qo}$ as a symplectic subspace of $\Gamma$, we will be able to derive the $\G$-charges that were postulated in [@us].\
The outline of the paper is as follows. Section \[sec2\] provides the background material for our discussion. In \[sec2.1\] we describe the class of spacetimes under consideration following closely reference [@bt]. In \[sec2.2\] we review the definition of generalized BMS group $\G$ as a symmetry group of such spacetimes. In \[sec2.3\] we recall the definition of radiative phase space associated to an arbitrary ‘frame’ an introduce the total space $\Gamma$ of all such radiative phase spaces. We also introduce certain subspaces with stronger fall-offs in $u$ that play a crucial role in the later discussion.

Section \[sec3\] is the main part of the paper. \[sec3.1\] describes the general idea behind our computation. In \[sec3.2\] we show that the covariant phase space symplectic structure induces a symplectic structure on (suitable subspace of) $\Gamma$. In section \[sec3.3\] we use this symplectic structure to derive the charges associated to the generators of $\diff(S^2)$. This represents the main result of the paper. In \[sec3.4\] we summarize the analogue results at past null infinity (our detailed calculations take place in future null infinity). Finally in \[sec3.5\] we give a brief summary of the results presented in [@us] on the equivalence between the $\diff(S^2)$ Ward identities and the CS theorem.

In section \[sec4\] we argue that subleading soft gravitons can be thought of as
had successfully lead to BMS charges [ @as ] could not be applied here.\ 
 It is then lifelike to try to work in the space $ \Gamma \sim \cup_{\ { q \ } } \Gamma^{q}$ off * all * radiative phase space on which $ \G$ act in a well defined manner. However we were so far miss a symplectic structure on $ \Gamma$. It is here that we turn to covariant phase space method [ @abr; @lw ]. 

 It is well known [ @am ] that the symplectic structure on $ \Gamma^{q}$ corresponds to the GR covariant phase space symplectic social organization $ \Ocov$ evaluated at null infinity. Here we will show that $ \Ocov$ naturally defines a symplectic social organization on (a suitable subspace of) $ \Gamma$. By realizing $ \Gamma^{\qo}$ as a symplectic subspace of $ \Gamma$, we will be able to deduce the $ \G$-charges that were postulated in [ @us].\ 
 The outline of the newspaper is as succeed. Section \[sec2\ ] provides the backdrop material for our discussion. In \[sec2.1\ ] we describe the class of spacetimes under consideration come closely reference [ @bt ]. In \[sec2.2\ ] we review the definition of generalized BMS group $ \G$ as a symmetry group of such spacetimes. In \[sec2.3\ ] we recall the definition of radiative phase space consociate to an arbitrary ‘ frame ’ an introduce the total space $ \Gamma$ of all such radiative phase spaces. We also introduce certain subspaces with stronger fall - offs in $ u$ that play a crucial role in the later discussion. 

 Section \[sec3\ ] is the main part of the paper. \[sec3.1\ ] describe the general idea behind our calculation. In \[sec3.2\ ] we picture that the covariant phase space symplectic structure induces a symplectic social organization on (suitable subspace of) $ \Gamma$. In incision \[sec3.3\ ] we use this symplectic structure to deduce the charges associated to the generators of $ \diff(S^2)$. This represents the main result of the paper. In \[sec3.4\ ] we summarize the analogue results at past null infinity (our detailed calculations take plaza in future null infinity). ultimately in \[sec3.5\ ] we give a brief summary of the results presented in [ @us ] on the equivalence between the $ \diff(S^2)$ Ward identity and the CS theorem. 

 In section \[sec4\ ] we argue that subleading soft gravitons can be think of as
 haf successfully lead to BOS charges [@as] could nov be apllied hefe.\
It is then natural to attelpr to qork in the space $\Gammx \sim \cup_{\{ q \}} \Gammq^{q}$ ohf *all* radiative phase sicces kk whieh $\G$ acts in a wgll defined kanner. However wd cere so far lacking a symplectic strtcture pn $\Gamma$. It is hgre tnwt ws turn to covariant phase space mefhods [@aur; @lw].

It is well known [@am] that the symplechic dtructure on $\Gamma^{e}$ correspones tj the GR covafiant phast vpace sympmectic structure $\Ocov$ evaluated at nbll infiniti. Gegg we will shiw thwt $\Ocov$ natuvslly dafines s symplectic sbructnre in (a suitable subspacx of) $\Gamma$. By realizyng $\Gamma^{\xo}$ as a symplectic wuvspacg of $\Cammx$, we wiml bs able to derive ths $\G$-charges rhat were postulatec yb [@us].\
The outlihe of ehq paper is as follows. Section \[sec2\] proviges the background materiao for our discussion. Ln \[sec2.1\] we describe the class of spacetimes under consideradion houloclkg cuisfly reference [@bt]. In \[sec2.2\] we review the definitykn on generalized BMF group $\G$ ax w ximmetry group uf suck slacetimes. In \[sec2.3\] wf recalj the definitijn og radiative phase space assiciated to au aebitrary ‘frame’ an nntroduce thz totak spave $\Gamma$ of all such rabiativs phase spafes. We alau introduce certxin sgbspaces with stronger falj-offs in $n$ thac play a cruvial rjle in the latev discussion.

Section \[sec3\] ns tha main parh of the paper. \[sec3.1\] describes thx general ides tehpnd our cjmputstion. In \[sec3.2\] re show that tke covarnant pfase space symplertic structuwe induces a vimplectic strncture on (suirablw subspxze of) $\Gamma$. In section \[sec3.3\] we use this symplectic sbructors to derive the chqrges associatec tu tre gxneraemrs of $\diff(S^2)$. Thir rdlresevts the maik rdsuly of the paper. In \[sew3.4\] we summarize the anakonue resuljs at pase null infiniyy (our detailed capculavions vake pkacg in future null infinity). Finalmy in \[sec3.5\] we give a bries sunmary of the results presented in [@us] on the equivalxnce between the $\diff(S^2)$ Qard identities and uhe CS theorek.

In sqction \[sew4\] we argue that sublwading soft graviuons can be thought of zs
had successfully lead to BMS charges [@as] be here.\ It then natural to space \sim \cup_{\{ q \Gamma^{q}$ off *all* phase spaces on which $\G$ acts a well defined manner. However we were so far lacking a symplectic structure $\Gamma$. It is here that we turn to covariant phase space methods [@abr; It well [@am] the symplectic structure on $\Gamma^{q}$ corresponds to the GR covariant phase space symplectic structure $\Ocov$ evaluated null infinity. Here we will show that $\Ocov$ defines a symplectic structure (a suitable subspace of) $\Gamma$. realizing as a subspace $\Gamma$, will be able derive the $\G$-charges that were postulated in [@us].\ The outline of the paper is as follows. Section provides the for our In we the class of consideration following closely reference [@bt]. In the definition of generalized BMS group $\G$ as symmetry group such spacetimes. In \[sec2.3\] we recall definition of radiative phase space associated to an ‘frame’ an introduce the total space $\Gamma$ of all such radiative phase spaces. We also subspaces with stronger fall-offs $u$ that play crucial in later Section \[sec3\] the main part of the paper. \[sec3.1\] describes the general idea our computation. In \[sec3.2\] we show that the covariant phase structure a symplectic structure (suitable subspace of) $\Gamma$. section we use this symplectic derive charges generators $\diff(S^2)$. represents the main result the paper. In \[sec3.4\] we the analogue results at calculations take place in future null infinity). Finally \[sec3.5\] we give a brief summary of results presented in [@us] on the equivalence between the $\diff(S^2)$ Ward identities the CS section \[sec4\] we argue that subleading soft gravitons be thought of as
 had successfully lead to BMS cHarges [@as] coUld noT be AppLiEd heRe.\
It Is then natural tO AtteMpt to work in the space $\GamMa \sim \CuP_{\{ Q \}} \GamMA^{q}$ Off *alL* radiatIVe PHAse SpAcEs oN wHIcH $\G$ actS in A well deFined manneR. HoWeVer we were so fAR lAcking a symPleCtic structurE on $\gamma$. IT iS heRE that We tUrn to CovariANt phasE space metHoDS [@abr; @lw].

iT is well KNOwN [@am] tHat the symplectic sTRuCTure on $\Gamma^{q}$ coRrespoNdS To THE GR CovAriant phasE sPace sYMplectiC StRUCTurE $\ocov$ evaluated At null infinITy. HEre we wIlL shOW that $\OCov$ naTuRAllY defines a syMpleCtic strucTure on (A SuitablE SubspacE of) $\GamMa$. BY reAlizINg $\gaMma^{\Qo}$ AS a sYMpLecTIc sUbspace oF $\GAmMa$, we wIll bE ABLE to dEriVe thE $\G$-chaRges that were pOstUlatED in [@Us].\
The OutliNe of ThE papeR is as fOllowS. SEction \[sec2\] providEs thE backgrouNd mAtEriAl For ouR DiscusSioN. In \[Sec2.1\] we deScribe tHE clAsS OF SpAcetimes under consiDeRATiOn followIng cloSElY rEFerence [@bT]. IN \[seC2.2\] we rEVIew thE defINiTion of geNeraliZEd bMs group $\G$ As A symmeTrY grOup Of sucH SpacEtimes. in \[sec2.3\] we rEcall THe definition of RAdiative phase SPaCE AsSOciaTed To an arbitraRy ‘frAMe’ an IntrODuCe tHE totaL spacE $\GAMmA$ Of all such radiative pHaSe spacEs. We aLso introduce cErtain subsPACEs with stRongER fALl-offs in $u$ that pLay a cRucial role IN the lateR discUssion.

SeCtion \[sec3\] iS THe main paRt oF thE paPer. \[SEC3.1\] dEscribes the geNERal iDeA behind Our ComputaTioN. In \[Sec3.2\] We sHoW that the cOvariant PhAsE sPaCe sYmpleCTic strucTuRe iNdUceS a symPLectic StrucTure On (SuITabLe subspACe OF) $\gammA$. IN sEctiOn \[sEc3.3\] We use This SYmpLectic sTructure tO deRIve tHe ChArges asSociated to the GeNerators of $\DiFf(S^2)$. this rePREsents thE main result of the paper. In \[SEc3.4\] we sumMarIze thE anaLogue resuLts At past NulL InfiniTy (our dEtailEd CalCULatioNS TaKe pLaCe in future NULl iNfiniTy). finaLly in \[seC3.5\] we give a brief summaRY of The results preSenTed iN [@US] oN thE EqUIvaLeNCe bETWeen the $\diff(S^2)$ WarD identitieS aND tHe CS theoreM.

in sEcTion \[sec4\] We argue That sUBleadinG soft gravItons can bE tHougHT Of aS
 had successfully lead toBMS charge s [@a s]cou ld  not  beapplied here.\ It i s then natural to atte mpt t ow orki nthe s pace $\ G am m a  \s im  \ cup _{ \ {q \}}  \G amma^{q }$ off *al l*ra diative phas e  s paces on w hic h $\G$ actsina well  d efi n ed ma nne r. Ho weverw e were  so far l ac k ing as ymplect i c  s truc ture on $\Gamma$. It is here that w e turn  t o  c o v ari ant  phase spa ce  meth o ds [@ab r ;@ l w ].It is well kn own [@am] t h atthe sy mp lec t ic str uctur eo n $ \Gamma^{q}$  cor respondsto the GR cova r iant ph ase sp ace  sy mple c ti cstr uc t ure $\ Oco v $ e valuated  a tnullinfi n i t y . He rewe w ill s how that $\Oc ov$  nat u ral ly de fines  a s ym plect ic str uctur eon (a suitablesubs pace of)$\G am ma$ .By re a lizing  $\ Gam ma^{\qo }$ as a sym pl e c t ic  subspace of $\Gam ma $ ,  w e will b e able to  d e rive the  $ \G$ -cha r g es th at w e re  postula ted in [@ us ].\
The  o utline  o f t hepaper is a s foll ows. Sec tion\ [sec2\] provid e s the backgro u nd m at e rial  fo r our discu ssio n . In  \[s e c2 .1\ ]  we d escri be th e  class of spacetime sunderconsi deration foll owing clos e l y  referen ce [ @ bt ] . In \[sec2.2\ ] wereview the definiti on of  general ized BMSg r oup $\G$  as  asym met r y  g roup of suchs p acet im es. In\[s ec2.3\]  we  re cal l t he  definiti on of ra di at iv epha se sp a ce assoc ia ted  t o a n arb i trary‘fram e’ a nin t rod uce the to t a l sp ac e$\Ga mma $of al l su c h r adiativ e phase s pac e s. W eal so intr oduce certain  s ubspaces w it h s tronge r fall-off s in $u$ that play a cr u cial ro lein th e la ter discu ssi on.

S ect i on \[s ec3\]is th emai n parto f  t hepa per. \[sec 3 . 1\]  desc ri besthe gen eral idea behind o u r c omputation. I n \ [sec 3 . 2\ ] w e  s h owth a t t h e  covariant phas e space sy mp l ec tic struct u rein duces a  symple ctics tructur e on (sui table sub sp aceo f ) $ \Gamma$. I n sectio n \[sec3. 3 \] we us e thi s s ymplec ti c s truct ure to der ive t he cha rg es ass ociat ed  to thegenerators of $\diff(S^ 2)$. T his r epr esents th e m a inresult of  the  paper. In  \[ sec 3.4\]  we summa rize th e a n alogu e re s ults at p a st  nu l l  i nfinity (ou r d eta iledcal c ulatio ns t ake place in futu r e null infinit y).F i nal lyi n \[ se c3.5\] we give  abr i e f summar yof the resu lts pres en t ed in  [@us]  on th e equiv a l en c e betw eenthe  $\diff(S ^2) $W ard ide nt it i es and  the  C S theo rem.
I n se c t ion \[sec4\] weargue t hat s u ble ading  s oft gra v iton s can be t hought of a s
 had_successfully lead_to BMS charges [@as]_could not_be_applied here.\
It_is_then natural to_attempt to work_in the space $\Gamma_\sim \cup_{\{ q_\}}_\Gamma^{q}$ off *all* radiative phase spaces on which $\G$ acts in a well defined_manner._However we_were_so_far lacking a symplectic structure_on $\Gamma$. It is here_that we_turn to covariant phase space methods [@abr; @lw].

It_is_well known [@am]_that the symplectic structure on $\Gamma^{q}$ corresponds to the_GR covariant phase space symplectic structure_$\Ocov$ evaluated at_null_infinity._Here we will show_that $\Ocov$ naturally defines a symplectic_structure on (a suitable subspace of)_$\Gamma$. By realizing $\Gamma^{\qo}$ as a symplectic_subspace of $\Gamma$, we will be_able to derive the $\G$-charges_that were_postulated in [@us].\
The outline of_the paper is_as follows._Section \[sec2\] provides_the background material for our discussion._In \[sec2.1\] we_describe the class of spacetimes under_consideration_following closely reference_[@bt]._In_\[sec2.2\] we_review the definition_of_generalized BMS_group_$\G$ as a symmetry group of_such_spacetimes. In \[sec2.3\] we recall the definition_of radiative phase space_associated_to an arbitrary ‘frame’_an introduce the total space_$\Gamma$ of all such radiative phase_spaces. We_also introduce_certain subspaces with stronger fall-offs in $u$ that play a crucial_role in the later discussion.

Section \[sec3\]_is the main part_of the_paper._\[sec3.1\] describes the_general_idea behind_our computation. In \[sec3.2\] we show that_the covariant_phase space symplectic structure induces a_symplectic structure on (suitable_subspace_of) $\Gamma$. In section \[sec3.3\] we_use this symplectic structure to derive_the charges associated to the_generators_of_$\diff(S^2)$. This represents the main_result of the paper. In \[sec3.4\]_we summarize the_analogue results at past null infinity (our_detailed_calculations take place in future null_infinity)._Finally in \[sec3.5\] we give a_brief_summary_of the results presented in_[@us] on the equivalence between the_$\diff(S^2)$ Ward identities and the CS theorem.

In section \[sec4\]_we argue that_subleading soft gravitons can be_thought_of_as