 inherent problem [@Dubray+12], the required computational cost is prohibitive. The microscopic approach, at the present time, is therefore best suited for studies of specific nuclei, but is not adequate for large-scale, global studies of fission yields and their trends across the chart of nuclides. A recent review covering the progress of this approach can be found in Ref. [@Schunck+16].

![\[fig:schema\] A schematic illustration of the fission process: The lower panel shows the potential energy of the nuclear system along its most probable path, while the upper panel shows the appearance of the system at four stages along that path. The nuclear shape, which is initially located near that of the ground state, is strongly coupled to the internal microscopic degrees of freedom and, as a result, it executes a Brownian-like random walk on the multidimensional potential-energy surface. After passing over the various saddle points, generally after multiple attempts, the system eventually acquires a binary shape and reaches a necked-in scission configuration where it divides into two fission fragments. The shown potential-energy profile is representative of known actinides, and may be differ qualitatively for nuclei in other regions. ](fission-schematic.pdf){width="\columnwidth"}

The macroscopic-microscopic approach offers a simpler and very effective framework for calculating the nuclear PES [@Nix+65]. This method was originally developed for the calculation of nuclear masses because purely microscopic calculations tend to have difficulty obtaining accurate absolute energies due to the small but significant role played by many-body correlations which are hard to treat. Nuclear masses exhibit smoothly varying macroscopic trends, reflecting the energetics of a charged droplet, overlaid with small-amplitude deviations reflecting the microscopic nuclear structure [@Gustafsson+71; @Brack+72; @Bolsterli+72]. The nuclear potential-energy surface is therefore considered to consist of a [*macroscopic*]{} liquid-drop like energy functional, whose parameters (volume energy, surface tension,...) are determined by global fitting to the measured masses, and a [*microscopic*]{} contribution expressing the shell [@Strutinsky+63] and pairing corrections [@Nogami+64], which can be calculated from the neutron and proton level spectra in the deformed effective potential well. This approach makes it possible to calculate the potential energy of any nuclear system with $Z$ protons and $N$ neutrons, $(Z,N)$, as a function of its shape (as well as its angular
inherent problem [ @Dubray+12 ], the required computational cost is prohibitive. The microscopic overture, at the present meter, is therefore best suited for study of specific nuclei, but is not adequate for large - plate, global studies of fission yields and their tendency across the chart of nuclides. A recent review cover the progress of this approach path can be establish in Ref.   [ @Schunck+16 ]. 

! [ \[fig: schema\ ] A schematic illustration of the fission process: The broken panel shows the potential department of energy of the nuclear system along its most probable way, while the upper panel show the appearance of the system at four stages along that path. The nuclear shape, which is initially located near that of the flat coat state, is strongly coupled to the internal microscopic degrees of freedom and, as a result, it executes a Brownian - like random walk on the multidimensional potential - energy surface. After passing over the various saddle points, by and large after multiple attempts, the system finally grow a binary condition and reaches a necked - in scission configuration where it divides into two fission fragments. The shown potential - department of energy profile is representative of known actinides, and may be differ qualitatively for nuclei in other regions. ] (fission - schematic.pdf){width="\columnwidth " } 

 The macroscopic - microscopic approach offers a simpler and very effective framework for calculating the nuclear PES [ @Nix+65 ]. This method acting was originally develop for the calculation of nuclear masses because purely microscopic calculations tend to have difficulty prevail accurate absolute energies due to the small but significant function played by many - body correlations which are hard to cover. Nuclear masses exhibit smoothly change macroscopic trends, reflect the energetics of a charged droplet, overlay with small - amplitude deviation reflecting the microscopic nuclear structure [ @Gustafsson+71; @Brack+72; @Bolsterli+72 ]. The nuclear likely - energy surface is therefore considered to consist of a [ * macroscopic * ] { } liquid - drop like energy functional, whose parameters (volume energy, surface latent hostility, ...) are determined by global adjustment to the measured masses, and a [ * microscopic * ] { } contribution expressing the shell [ @Strutinsky+63 ] and pairing corrections [ @Nogami+64 ], which can be calculated from the neutron and proton degree spectra in the deformed effective potential well. This approach makes it possible to calculate the potential department of energy of any nuclear system with $ Z$ protons and $ N$ neutrons, $ (Z, N)$, as a function of its shape (as well as its angular
 injerent problem [@Dubray+12], tht required computcrional cost js prohicitive. The microscopic approech, qt tht present time, is tferefore hest suired hor studies of s'scific kbclei, nut iv not adequate nor large-scdle, global stugids of fission yields and their trends across tje chart of nuslidts. W redvnu review covering the progress of this akproach can be foumd in Ref. [@Schunck+16].

![\[fig:schema\] W scjematic illustratiln of the fussijb process: Thd lower panel shows thg potential energy of the nucleaf syscem along ijs mlvt probable path, while the uiier panal showx the appearange of thw system at four stagxs along that path. Tre nucleas ahape, which is inutually locdted beaf tgav or the hronnd state, ia strongly xoupled to the intetnwo microscopic degreqs of freedom and, as a result, it executes a Grownian-like random walj on the multidimensilnal potegtial-energy surface. After passing over the variouv sadvld piikts, ewnfrally after multiple attempts, the system evegfuslky acquires a ninary shape and rrafhrf a necked-in rcission donfiguration wherf it didides into two fisxion fragments. The shown porential-energj prifile is representctive of knocn actonidex, and may be differ quauitafively for juclei in uther regions. ](firsipn-vchematic.pdf){width="\columnwideh"}

The maccosco'ic-microrcopoc appwoach offegs a simpler and very efvectire frdmework fog calculating the nuclear PES [@Nme+65]. This method wds mriginaljy deyeloped for the calculation oy nucleax massds because purely microscopis calculationv tend to havx difficujty ibtauning azzurate absolutr energies due to tye small but signinicanj dole played by nani-vody correlatipns whycj ere hwsd to treat. Tucldar kasser exhibit snuothky varying macroscophc tdends, reflecting tne energetucs of a charged dropket, overlaid with dmall-emplitnde defiajions reflecting the microscopid nuclear stvucture [@Gustasssok+71; @Brwck+72; @Bolstexli+72]. The nuclear potential-energy surface ms therefore considered to consist of a [*maerpscopic*]{} liqnid-dro[ like enargy functional, whosw parameters (voluke energy, surface tenaion,...) ase dehermined by global fitting to the measured masses, and a [*microscopic*]{} contrubutioi qxpressing fhe xhell [@Scrucinsky+63] wnd 'amring corrections [@Nogami+64], which can be calculated from tha ueutron and proton level specyrx in the defotmed effective potential wsll. This approach makes it possible to valculate the potential cnergy of any hucleag sbstem with $Z$ protons and $N$ neuteons, $(Z,N)$, as w function of itx dhape (as aell aa its angular
inherent problem [@Dubray+12], the required computational cost The approach, at present time, is of nuclei, but is adequate for large-scale, studies of fission yields and their across the chart of nuclides. A recent review covering the progress of this can be found in Ref. [@Schunck+16]. ![\[fig:schema\] A schematic illustration of the fission The panel the energy of the nuclear system along its most probable path, while the upper panel shows the of the system at four stages along that The nuclear shape, which initially located near that of ground is strongly to internal degrees of freedom as a result, it executes a Brownian-like random walk on the multidimensional potential-energy surface. After passing over various saddle after multiple the eventually a binary shape a necked-in scission configuration where it fission fragments. The shown potential-energy profile is representative known actinides, may be differ qualitatively for nuclei other regions. ](fission-schematic.pdf){width="\columnwidth"} The macroscopic-microscopic approach offers a and very effective framework for calculating the nuclear PES [@Nix+65]. This method was originally developed calculation of nuclear masses purely microscopic calculations to difficulty accurate energies due the small but significant role played by many-body correlations which are to treat. Nuclear masses exhibit smoothly varying macroscopic trends, reflecting of charged droplet, overlaid small-amplitude deviations reflecting the nuclear [@Gustafsson+71; @Brack+72; @Bolsterli+72]. The surface therefore of [*macroscopic*]{} like energy functional, whose (volume energy, surface tension,...) are by global fitting to [*microscopic*]{} contribution expressing the shell [@Strutinsky+63] and pairing [@Nogami+64], which can be calculated from the and proton level spectra in the deformed effective potential well. This approach it possible the potential energy of any nuclear system with protons and $N$ neutrons, as a function of its shape (as well as angular
 inherent problem [@Dubray+12], the rEquired comPutatIonAl cOsT is pRohiBitive. The microSCopiC approach, at the present tIme, is ThERefoRE bEst suIted for STuDIEs oF sPeCifIc NUcLei, buT is Not adeqUate for larGe-sCaLe, global studIEs Of fission yIelDs and their trEndS acrosS tHe cHArt of NucLides. a recenT Review Covering tHe PRogresS Of this aPPRoAch cAn be found in Ref. [@SchUNcK+16].

![\[Fig:schema\] A scheMatic iLlUStRATioN of The fission PrOcess: tHe lower PAnEL SHowS The potential eNergy of the nUCleAr systEm AloNG its moSt proBaBLe pAth, while the UppeR panel shoWs the aPPearancE Of the syStem at FouR stAges ALoNg ThaT pATh. THE nUclEAr sHape, whicH iS iNitiaLly lOCATEd neAr tHat oF the gRound state, is sTroNgly COupLed to The inTernAl MicroScopic DegreEs Of freedom and, as a ResuLt, it execuTes A BRowNiAn-likE Random WalK on The multIdimensIOnaL pOTENtIal-energy surface. AfTeR PAsSing over The varIOuS sADdle poinTs, GenEralLY After MultIPlE attemptS, the sySTeM eVentualLy AcquirEs A biNarY shapE And rEaches A necked-iN scisSIon configuratiON where it dividES iNTO tWO fisSioN fragments. THe shOWn poTentIAl-EneRGy proFile iS rEPrESentative of known actInIdes, anD may bE differ qualitAtively for NUCLei in othEr reGIoNS. ](fission-schemaTic.pdF){width="\coluMNwidth"}

ThE macrOscopic-mIcroscopiC APproach oFfeRs a SimPleR ANd Very effective FRAmewOrK for calCulAting thE nuCleAr PeS [@NIx+65]. this methoD was origInAlLy DeVelOped fOR the calcUlAtiOn Of nUcleaR Masses BecauSe puReLy MIcrOscopic CAlCULatiOnS tEnd tO haVe DiffiCultY ObtAining aCcurate abSolUTe enErGiEs due to The small but siGnIficant rolE pLayEd by maNY-Body corrElations which are hard to tREat. NuclEar MasseS exhIbit smootHly VaryinG maCRoscopIc trenDs, refLeCtiNG The enERGeTicS oF a charged dROPleT, overLaId wiTh small-Amplitude deviationS RefLecting the micRosCopiC NUcLeaR StRUctUrE [@gusTAFsson+71; @Brack+72; @BolstErli+72]. The nucLeAR pOtential-enERgy SuRface is TherefoRe conSIdered tO consist oF a [*macroscOpIc*]{} liQUId-dRop like eneRgy functIonal, whosE ParamETeRs (volUme Energy, SuRfaCe tenSion,...) arE DetErminEd by glObAl fittIng to ThE measureD masses, and a [*microscopic*]{} cOntribUtion ExpRessing thE shELl [@STrutinsky+63] And pAiring corrEctIonS [@NogaMi+64], wHIch caN be cALcUlaTEd froM the NEutron and PRoTon LEVeL spectra in tHE DEfoRmed eFfeCTive poTentIal well. This approaCH makes it possibLe to CALcuLatE The pOtEntial energy of Any NuCLEar systeM wIth $Z$ protons And $N$ neutRoNS, $(Z,N)$, as A functIon of iTs shape (AS WeLL as its AnguLar
 inherent problem [@Dubray +12], therequi red  co mp utat iona l cost is proh i biti ve. The microscopic ap proac h, at t h eprese nt time ,  i s the re fo rebe s tsuite d f or stud ies of spe cif ic  nuclei, but is  not adequ ate  for large-s cal e, glo ba l s t udies  of  fiss ion yi e lds an d their t re n ds acr o ss thec h ar t of  nuclides. A rece n tr eview covering  the p ro g re s s  of  th is approac hcan b e  foundi nR e f . [ @ Schunck+16].
![\[fig:sc h ema \] A s ch ema t ic ill ustra ti o n o f the fissi on p rocess: T he low e r panel shows t he pot ent ial  ene r gy  o f t he nuc l ea r s y ste m alongit smostprob a b l e  pat h,whil e the  upper panelsho ws t h e a ppear anceof t he  syst em atfourst ages along that  pat h. The nu cle ar  sh ap e, wh i ch isini tia lly loc ated ne a r t ha t o fthe ground state,is s tr ongly co upledt oth e  interna lmic rosc o p ic de gree s  o f freedo m and, as  a  result ,it exe cu tes  aBrown i an-l ike ra ndom wal k ont he multidimens i onal potentia l -e n e rg y  sur fac e. After pa ssin g  ove r th e  v ari o us sa ddlepo i nt s , generally after m ul tipleattem pts, the syst em eventua l l y  acquire s ab in a ry shape and r eache s a necked - in sciss ion c onfigura tion wher e it divid esint o t wof i ss ion fragments . Thesh own pot ent ial-ene rgy  pr ofi leis  represen tative o fkn ow nact inide s , and ma ybedi ffe r qua l itativ ely f or n uc le i  in  otherr eg i o ns.]( fi ssio n-s ch emati c.pd f ){w idth="\ columnwid th" } 

Th ema croscop ic-microscopi capproach o ff ers  a sim p l er and v ery effective framework for cal cul ating  the  nuclearPES  [@Nix +65 ] . This  metho d was  o rig i n allyd e ve lop ed  for the c a l cul ation  o f nu clear m asses because pure l y m icroscopic ca lcu lati o n sten d  t o  ha ve dif f i culty obtaining  accurateab s ol ute energi e s d ue  to the  smallbut s i gnifica nt role p layed byma ny-b o d y c orrelation s whichare hardt o tre a t.  Nucl ear  masse sexh ibitsmooth l y v aryin g macr os copictrend s,  reflect ing the energetics of a  charg ed dr opl et, overl aid wit h small-a mpli tude devia tio nsrefle cti n g the  mic r os cop i c nuc lear structure [@ Gus t a fs son+71; @Br a c k +72 ; @Bo lst e rli+72 ]. T he nuclear potent i al-energy surf acei s  th ere f oreco nsidered to co nsi st o f a [*ma cr oscopic*]{}  liquid- dr o p lik e ener gy fun ctional , wh o se par amet ers  (volumeene rg y , surfa ce  t e nsion, ...)  a re det ermine d  byg l obal fitting tothe m e a sured mas ses,an d a [*m i cros copic*]{}contributio n expr essi ng th e shell  [ @Strut ins ky +63] and p a iring cor recti ons [@N og ami+ 64] , whic h ca n be ca lcul at edfrom then e ut r on  a n d p roto n lev el  spe ctra in t h e deform ede ffectiv epot e n tial w e ll . This appro ach  make s it possibl e  toc al c ulate  the p otenti al ener g y o fany nuc lea r system wi th $Z$ pr o ton sand$N$ neut ro ns,$( Z,N )$ , as a function  of itsshape (a s well a s i t s an g ular
 inherent_problem [@Dubray+12],_the required computational cost_is prohibitive._The_microscopic approach,_at_the present time,_is therefore best_suited for studies of_specific nuclei, but_is_not adequate for large-scale, global studies of fission yields and their trends across the_chart_of nuclides._A_recent_review covering the progress of_this approach can be found_in Ref. [@Schunck+16].

![\[fig:schema\]_A schematic illustration of the fission process: The_lower_panel shows the_potential energy of the nuclear system along its most_probable path, while the upper panel_shows the appearance_of_the_system at four stages_along that path. The nuclear shape,_which is initially located near that_of the ground state, is strongly coupled_to the internal microscopic degrees of_freedom and, as a result,_it executes_a Brownian-like random walk on_the multidimensional potential-energy_surface. After_passing over the_various saddle points, generally after multiple_attempts, the system_eventually acquires a binary shape and_reaches_a necked-in scission_configuration_where_it divides_into two fission_fragments._The shown_potential-energy_profile is representative of known actinides,_and_may be differ qualitatively for nuclei in_other regions. ](fission-schematic.pdf){width="\columnwidth"}

The macroscopic-microscopic_approach_offers a simpler and_very effective framework for calculating_the nuclear PES [@Nix+65]. This method_was originally_developed for_the calculation of nuclear masses because purely microscopic calculations tend to_have difficulty obtaining accurate absolute energies_due to the small_but significant_role_played by many-body_correlations_which are_hard to treat. Nuclear masses exhibit smoothly_varying macroscopic_trends, reflecting the energetics of a_charged droplet, overlaid with_small-amplitude_deviations reflecting the microscopic nuclear structure_[@Gustafsson+71; @Brack+72; @Bolsterli+72]. The nuclear potential-energy_surface is therefore considered to_consist_of_a [*macroscopic*]{} liquid-drop like energy_functional, whose parameters (volume energy, surface_tension,...) are determined_by global fitting to the measured masses,_and_a [*microscopic*]{} contribution expressing the shell_[@Strutinsky+63]_and pairing corrections [@Nogami+64], which can_be_calculated_from the neutron and proton_level spectra in the deformed effective_potential well. This approach makes it possible to calculate_the potential energy_of any nuclear system with_$Z$_protons_and $N$ neutrons, $(Z,N)$, as a function of its shape_(as well_as its angular