
\sigma_{xy}(\omega,B)&=\frac{n_e q_e^2 \tau_e}{m^*_e}\frac{\omega_{c,e}\tau_e}{(1-i\omega \tau_e)^2-\omega_{c,e}^2}\notag\\
&\quad+\frac{n_h q_h^2 \tau_h}{m^*_h}\frac{\omega_{c,h}\tau_h}{(1-i\omega \tau_h)^2-\omega_{c,h}^2}\end{aligned}$$

![(a) Real- and (b) imaginary-part of the longitudinal optical conductivity spectrum, and (c) real- and (d) imaginary-part of the optical Hall conductivity spectrum, respectively, of FeSe at $T=\SI{7}{K}$ with $B=\SI{7}{T}$. Green open square represents experimental result, blue dashed, red dashed, and grey solid line indicate the contribution of the hole carrier, electron carrier, and sum of them given by the two-carrier Drude fitting described in the text.](Fig2.pdf){width="\columnwidth"}

where $q_e=-e$ ($q_h=+e$), $n_e$ ($n_h$), $\tau_e$ ($\tau_h$), $m_e^*$ ($m_h^*$), $\omega_{c,e}=q_e B/m_e^*$ ($\omega_{c,h}=q_h B/m_h^*$) represent the charge of carrier, carrier density, scattering time, effective mass, cyclotron frequency of the electrons (holes), respectively. Notably, the optical Hall conductivity is sensitive to the carrier type (electron-like or hole-like) while the longitudinal conductivity is formally independent of the sign of the charge carriers. The sign change around in the imaginary-part of $\sigma_{xy} (\omega)$ indicates that two types of carriers exist with different sign of charge, which can be attributed to those in the electron pocket and hole pocket in FeSe. We can determine the complete set of the parameters describing charge carrier dynamics, $n_e=\SI{5.4E19}{cm^{-3}}$, $n_h=\SI{1.7E20}{cm^{-3}}$, $m_e=0.86m_0$, $m_h=2.90m_0$, $\tau_
\sigma_{xy}(\omega, B)&=\frac{n_e q_e^2 \tau_e}{m^*_e}\frac{\omega_{c, e}\tau_e}{(1 - i\omega \tau_e)^2-\omega_{c, e}^2}\notag\\ 
 & \quad+\frac{n_h q_h^2 \tau_h}{m^*_h}\frac{\omega_{c, h}\tau_h}{(1 - i\omega \tau_h)^2-\omega_{c, h}^2}\end{aligned}$$ 

! [ (a) Real- and (b) imaginary - part of the longitudinal optical conductivity spectrum, and (vitamin c) real- and (d) fanciful - part of the optical Hall conduction spectrum, respectively, of FeSe at $ T=\SI{7}{K}$ with $ B=\SI{7}{T}$. Green open public square represents experimental result, blue dash, red dash, and grey solid channel indicate the contribution of the hole mailman, electron carrier, and sum of them give by the two - carrier Drude fitting described in the text.](Fig2.pdf){width="\columnwidth " } 

 where $ q_e=-e$ ($ q_h=+e$), $ n_e$ ($ n_h$), $ \tau_e$ ($ \tau_h$), $ m_e^*$ ($ m_h^*$), $ \omega_{c, e}=q_e B / m_e^*$ ($ \omega_{c, h}=q_h B / m_h^*$) typify the charge of carrier, carrier concentration, scattering time, effective batch, cyclotron frequency of the electrons (hole), respectively. Notably, the optical Hall conductivity is sensitive to the carrier type (electron - alike or hole - like) while the longitudinal conductivity is formally independent of the sign of the charge carriers. The sign change around in the imaginary - part of $ \sigma_{xy } (\omega)$ indicates that two types of carriers exist with different sign of charge, which can be impute to those in the electron pocket and hole pouch in FeSe. We can settle the complete set of the parameters trace charge carrier dynamics, $ n_e=\SI{5.4E19}{cm^{-3}}$, $ n_h=\SI{1.7E20}{cm^{-3}}$, $ m_e=0.86m_0 $, $ m_h=2.90m_0 $, $ \tau _

\sigla_{xy}(\omega,B)&=\frac{n_e q_e^2 \tau_e}{o^*_e}\frac{\omega_{c,e}\tao_e}{(1-u\omega \tau_e)^2-\ojega_{c,e}^2}\nogag\\
&\quad+\frac{n_h q_h^2 \tau_h}{m^*_h}\frac{\oleta_{c,h}\tqu_h}{(1-i\omega \tau_h)^2-\omega_{c,h}^2}\evd{aligned}$$

![(w) Real- abd (b) umaginary-pedt of tmz lonfltudiuao optical condoctivity spewtrum, and (c) redl- aud (d) imaginary-part of the optical Hajl condichivity spectrui, rex[ectjneoy, of FeSe at $T=\SI{7}{K}$ with $B=\SI{7}{T}$. Freen oken square represemts experimental result, blke dwshed, red dashed, ajd grey solud lybe indicate ghe contribution of thg hole carrier, electron carrier, xnd sbm of them ticen ty the two-cerrier Drude fittikb descsibed im the text.](Fig2.pcf){wmdth="\xolumnwidth"}

where $q_e=-e$ ($x_h=+e$), $n_e$ ($n_h$), $\tau_e$ ($\tau_r$), $m_e^*$ ($m_h^*$), $\okeya_{c,e}=q_e B/m_e^*$ ($\omega_{c,h}=q_h V/m_y^*$) reptesend thd chxrgt oh czrrier, cacrier densify, scatteribg time, effective mssf, cyclotron frsquencr jf the electrons (holes), respectively. Notdblg, the optical Hall condyctivity is sensitive to the cwrrier type (electron-like or hole-like) while the lotgituvival cjveuftivity is formally independent of the sign os tne charge carrievs. The sign change agoigd in the imaeinary-'zrf of $\sigma_{xy} (\omega)$ indicajes thqt two tykes og carriers exist with diffeeent sign of xharge, which can bz attributed to jhose on the electron pocket cnd home pocket ij FeSe. We zan determine thd cpm[lete seu of the parameterf describmng ckarge cafriet dynamycs, $n_e=\SI{5.4E19}{cl^{-3}}$, $n_h=\SL{1.7A20}{cm^{-3}}$, $m_e=0.86m_0$, $m_h=2.90m_0$, $\tau_
\sigma_{xy}(\omega,B)&=\frac{n_e q_e^2 \tau_e}{m^*_e}\frac{\omega_{c,e}\tau_e}{(1-i\omega \tau_e)^2-\omega_{c,e}^2}\notag\\ &\quad+\frac{n_h q_h^2 \tau_h}{m^*_h}\frac{\omega_{c,h}\tau_h}{(1-i\omega Real- (b) imaginary-part the longitudinal optical and imaginary-part of the Hall conductivity spectrum, of FeSe at $T=\SI{7}{K}$ with $B=\SI{7}{T}$. open square represents experimental result, blue dashed, red dashed, and grey solid line the contribution of the hole carrier, electron carrier, and sum of them given the Drude described the text.](Fig2.pdf){width="\columnwidth"} where $q_e=-e$ ($q_h=+e$), $n_e$ ($n_h$), $\tau_e$ ($\tau_h$), $m_e^*$ ($m_h^*$), $\omega_{c,e}=q_e B/m_e^*$ ($\omega_{c,h}=q_h B/m_h^*$) represent charge of carrier, carrier density, scattering time, effective cyclotron frequency of the (holes), respectively. Notably, the optical conductivity sensitive to carrier (electron-like hole-like) while the conductivity is formally independent of the sign of the charge carriers. The sign change around in the of $\sigma_{xy} that two of exist different sign of can be attributed to those in and hole pocket in FeSe. We can determine complete set the parameters describing charge carrier dynamics, $n_h=\SI{1.7E20}{cm^{-3}}$, $m_e=0.86m_0$, $m_h=2.90m_0$, $\tau_

\sigma_{xy}(\omega,B)&=\frac{n_e q_e^2 \tau_e}{M^*_e}\frac{\omegA_{c,e}\taU_e}{(1-i\OmeGa \Tau_e)^2-\OmegA_{c,e}^2}\notag\\
&\quad+\frAC{n_h q_H^2 \tau_h}{m^*_h}\frac{\omega_{c,h}\tau_h}{(1-I\omegA \tAU_h)^2-\omEGa_{C,h}^2}\end{Aligned}$$

![(A) reAL- And (B) iMaGinArY-PaRt of tHe lOngitudInal opticaL coNdUctivity specTRuM, and (c) real- aNd (d) Imaginary-parT of The optIcAl HALl conDucTivitY spectRUm, respEctively, oF FEse at $T=\Si{7}{k}$ with $B=\Si{7}{t}$. grEen oPen square represenTS eXPerimental resuLt, blue DaSHeD, REd dAshEd, and grey sOlId linE IndicatE ThE CONtrIBution of the hoLe carrier, elECtrOn carrIeR, anD Sum of tHem giVeN By tHe two-carrieR DruDe fitting DescriBEd in the TExt.](Fig2.pDf){widtH="\coLumNwidTH"}

wHeRe $q_E=-e$ ($Q_H=+e$), $n_E$ ($N_h$), $\Tau_E$ ($\Tau_H$), $m_e^*$ ($m_h^*$), $\omeGa_{C,e}=Q_e B/m_e^*$ ($\OmegA_{C,H}=Q_H B/m_h^*$) RepReseNt the Charge of carriEr, cArriER deNsity, ScattErinG tIme, efFectivE mass, CyClotron frequencY of tHe electroNs (hOlEs), rEsPectiVEly. NotAblY, thE opticaL Hall coNDucTiVITY iS sensitive to the carRiER TyPe (electrOn-like OR hOlE-Like) whilE tHe lOngiTUDinal CondUCtIvity is fOrmallY InDePendent Of The sigN oF thE chArge cARrieRs. The sIgn changE arouND in the imaginarY-Part of $\sigma_{xy} (\OMeGA)$ InDIcatEs tHat two types Of caRRierS exiST wIth DIfferEnt siGn OF cHArge, which can be attriBuTed to tHose iN the electron pOcket and hoLE POcket in FESe. WE CaN Determine the coMpletE set of the pARameters DescrIbing chaRge carrieR DYnamics, $n_E=\SI{5.4e19}{cm^{-3}}$, $N_h=\Si{1.7E20}{cM^{-3}}$, $M_E=0.86m_0$, $M_h=2.90m_0$, $\tau_

\sigma_{xy}(\omega,B)&=\f rac{n_e q_ e^2 \ tau _e} {m ^*_e }\fr ac{\omega_{c,e } \tau _e}{(1-i\omega \tau_e) ^2-\o me g a_{c , e} ^2}\n otag\\& \q u a d+\ fr ac {n_ hq _h ^2 \t au_ h}{m^*_ h}\frac{\o meg a_ {c,h}\tau_h} { (1 -i\omega \ tau _h)^2-\omega _{c ,h}^2} \e nd{ a ligne d}$ $

![ (a) Re a l- and  (b) imag in a ry-par t  of the l on gitu dinal optical con d uc t ivity spectrum , and(c )  r e a l-and  (d) imagi na ry-pa r t of th e  o p t i cal Hall conducti vity spectr u m,respec ti vel y , of F eSe a t$ T=\ SI{7}{K}$ w ith$B=\SI{7} {T}$.G reen op e n squar e repr ese nts  exp e ri me nta lr esu l t,  bl u e d ashed, r ed  d ashed , an d g r ey s oli d li ne in dicate the co ntr ibut i onof th e hol e ca rr ier,electr on ca rr ier, and sum of  the m given b y t he  tw o- carri e r Drud e f itt ing des cribedi n t he t e xt .](Fig2.pdf){width =" \ c ol umnwidth "}

wh e re  $ q _e=-e$ ( $q _h= +e$) , $n_e$  ($n _ h$ ), $\tau _e$ ($ \ ta u_ h$), $m _e ^*$ ($ m_ h^* $),  $\om e ga_{ c,e}=q _e B/m_e ^*$ ( $ \omega_{c,h}=q _ h B/m_h^*$) r e pr e s en t  the  ch arge of car rier ,  car rier de nsi t y, sc atter in g  t i me, effective mass,  c yclotr on fr equency of th e electron s ( holes),resp e ct i vely. Notably,  theoptical Ha l l conduc tivit y is sen sitive to t he carri ertyp e ( ele c t ro n-like or hol e - like )while t helongitu din alcon duc ti vity is f ormallyin de pe nd ent  of t h e sign o fthe  c har ge ca r riers.  Thesign  c ha n gearoundi nt h e im ag in ary- par tof $\ sigm a _{x y} (\om ega)$ ind ica t es t ha ttwo typ es of carrier sexist with  d iff erents i gn of ch arge, which can be attr i buted t o t hosein t he electr onpocket  an d  holepocket  in F eS e.W e  cand e te rmi ne  the compl e t e s et of  t he p aramete rs describing char g e c arrier dynami cs,  $n_ e = \S I{5 . 4E 1 9}{ cm ^ {-3 } } $, $n_h=\SI{1.7 E20}{cm^{- 3} } $,  $m_e=0.86 m _0$ ,$m_h=2. 90m_0$,  $\ta u _

\sigma_{xy}(\omega,B)&=\frac{n_e q_e^2_\tau_e}{m^*_e}\frac{\omega_{c,e}\tau_e}{(1-i\omega \tau_e)^2-\omega_{c,e}^2}\notag\\
&\quad+\frac{n_h_q_h^2 \tau_h}{m^*_h}\frac{\omega_{c,h}\tau_h}{(1-i\omega \tau_h)^2-\omega_{c,h}^2}\end{aligned}$$

![(a) Real-_and (b)_imaginary-part_of the_longitudinal_optical conductivity spectrum,_and (c) real-_and (d) imaginary-part of_the optical Hall_conductivity_spectrum, respectively, of FeSe at $T=\SI{7}{K}$ with $B=\SI{7}{T}$. Green open square represents experimental result,_blue_dashed, red_dashed,_and_grey solid line indicate the_contribution of the hole carrier,_electron carrier,_and sum of them given by the two-carrier_Drude_fitting described in_the text.](Fig2.pdf){width="\columnwidth"}

where $q_e=-e$ ($q_h=+e$), $n_e$ ($n_h$), $\tau_e$ ($\tau_h$), $m_e^*$_($m_h^*$), $\omega_{c,e}=q_e B/m_e^*$ ($\omega_{c,h}=q_h B/m_h^*$) represent_the charge of_carrier,_carrier_density, scattering time, effective_mass, cyclotron frequency of the electrons_(holes), respectively. Notably, the optical Hall_conductivity is sensitive to the carrier type_(electron-like or hole-like) while the longitudinal_conductivity is formally independent of_the sign_of the charge carriers. The_sign change around_in the_imaginary-part of $\sigma_{xy}_(\omega)$ indicates that two types of_carriers exist with_different sign of charge, which can_be_attributed to those_in_the_electron pocket_and hole pocket_in_FeSe. We_can_determine the complete set of the_parameters_describing charge carrier dynamics, $n_e=\SI{5.4E19}{cm^{-3}}$, $n_h=\SI{1.7E20}{cm^{-3}}$, $m_e=0.86m_0$,_$m_h=2.90m_0$, $\tau_