3.1 & 157.5$\pm$6.1 & 368.0$\pm$10.7 & 3.1$\pm$0.1 & 1.6$\pm$0.1\
23128$^{\dag}$ & 123.6$\pm$3.2 & & 70.0$\pm$3.6 & 163.0$\pm$4.9 & 134.5$\pm$4.8 & 140.4$\pm$14.2 & & & 1.8$\pm$0.1\

14348S$^{6}$ & 21.8$\pm$4.6 & 73.9$\pm$9.0 & & & & & & 3.4$\pm$0.8 &\
\
14348N$^{6}$ & 11.3$\pm$3.6 & 22.9$\pm$5.0 & & & & & & 2.0$\pm$0.8 &\
\
14348$^{6}$ & 33.1$\pm$5.8 & 96.8$\pm$10.3 & & & & & & 2.9$\pm$0.6 &\
14348$^{\dag}$ & 37.9$\pm$1.6 & & 16.9$\pm$2.0 & 52.6$\pm$2.4 & 34.4$\pm$3.3 & 14.1$\pm$10.7 & & & 2.2$\pm$0.3\

**Table note:** For each interacting system, we have measured the integrated flux of the individual galaxies resolved by ISOCAM and marked the southern and the northern galaxies with (S) and (N) respectively. We used the same notations as in Table 2 for identifying the different sets of ISOCAM observations, labeled (1) through (6). As all three galaxies were also observed with ISOPHOT-S and one with the CVF, we also provide the equivalent broad-band filter flux estimates (using the known filter band-passes and transmission curves) based on those spectra marked with a $\dag$ for ISOPHOT-S and a (5) for the CVF. The errors given for each measurement are statistical derived by adding the 1$\sigma$ rms map to the systematic error of 10% commonly associated with the transient correction. Absolute flux uncertainties are estimated to be $\pm$ 20$\%$. For the cases where
3.1 & 157.5$\pm$6.1 & 368.0$\pm$10.7 & 3.1$\pm$0.1 & 1.6$\pm$0.1\ 
 23128$^{\dag}$ & 123.6$\pm$3.2 & & 70.0$\pm$3.6 & 163.0$\pm$4.9 & 134.5$\pm$4.8 & 140.4$\pm$14.2 & & & 1.8$\pm$0.1\ 

 14348S$^{6}$ & 21.8$\pm$4.6 & 73.9$\pm$9.0 & & & & & & 3.4$\pm$0.8 & \ 
 \ 
 14348N$^{6}$ & 11.3$\pm$3.6 & 22.9$\pm$5.0 & & & & & & 2.0$\pm$0.8 & \ 
 \ 
 14348$^{6}$ & 33.1$\pm$5.8 & 96.8$\pm$10.3 & & & & & & 2.9$\pm$0.6 & \ 
 14348$^{\dag}$ & 37.9$\pm$1.6 & & 16.9$\pm$2.0 & 52.6$\pm$2.4 & 34.4$\pm$3.3 & 14.1$\pm$10.7 & & & 2.2$\pm$0.3\ 

 * * Table note :* * For each interacting system, we have measured the integrate magnetic field of the individual galaxies resolved by ISOCAM and marked the southerly and the northern galaxies with (S) and (N) respectively. We use the like notations as in Table 2 for identifying the different sets of ISOCAM observation, labeled (1) through (6). As all three galaxies were besides observed with ISOPHOT - S and one with the CVF, we also provide the equivalent broad - band filter flux estimates (use the known filter band - passes and infection curves) based on those spectra marked with a $ \dag$ for ISOPHOT - S and a (5) for the CVF. The mistake given for each measurement are statistical derived by adding the 1$\sigma$ rms map to the systematic mistake of 10% commonly associated with the transient correction. Absolute flux uncertainties are estimated to be $ \pm$ 20$\%$. For the cases where
3.1 & 157.5$\pl$6.1 & 368.0$\pm$10.7 & 3.1$\pm$0.1 & 1.6$\pm$0.1\
23128$^{\dag}$ & 123.6$\pm$3.2 & & 70.0$\po$3.6 & 163.0$\pm$4.9 & 134.5$\pm$4.8 & 140.4$\pm$14.2 & & & 1.8$\pm$0.1\

14348S$^{6}$ & 21.8$\'m$4.6 & 73.9$\pm$9.0 & & & & & & 3.4$\pm$0.8 &\
\
14348N$^{6}$ & 11.3$\pm$3.6 & 22.9$\pm$5.0 & & & & & & 2.0$\pm$0.8 &\
\
14348$^{6}$ & 33.1$\pm$5.8 & 96.8$\pm$10.3 & & & & & & 2.9$\ki$0.6 &\
14348$^{\dag}$ & 37.9$\pm$1.6 & & 16.9$\pm$2.0 & 52.6$\pm$2.4 & 34.4$\pm$3.3 & 14.1$\pm$10.7 & & & 2.2$\pm$0.3\

**Taboe nire:** For eaci interagcing anstem, xe have measurec the intecrated flux of tfe individual galaxies resolved by ISJCAM anc larked the soujhern wnd fhe northern galaxies with (S) and (N) respecuively. We used the same notations as in Tablf 2 flr identifying the different wets if ISOCAM obrervations, labeled (1) thtough (6). As all three galaxies werd alsp observed wuth HSOPHOT-S anv one rith the CVF, we also providr the equivalekt brmad-vand filter flux estikates (using the knjwn filtes yand-passes and transmuswion wurvas) bxwed on tioss spechra marked wifh a $\dag$ foe ISOPHOT-S and a (5) fpr nne CVF. The edrors diden for each measurement are statistican dsrived by adding the 1$\sitma$ rms map to the sydtematic qrror of 10% commonly associated with the transient worrertkon. Ansoljre flux uncertainties are estimated to be $\pm$ 20$\%$. Fjd uhe cases where
3.1 & 157.5$\pm$6.1 & 368.0$\pm$10.7 & 3.1$\pm$0.1 23128$^{\dag}$ 123.6$\pm$3.2 & 70.0$\pm$3.6 & 163.0$\pm$4.9 & 1.8$\pm$0.1\ 14348S$^{6}$ & & 73.9$\pm$9.0 & & & & & 3.4$\pm$0.8 &\ 14348N$^{6}$ & 11.3$\pm$3.6 & 22.9$\pm$5.0 & & & & & & 2.0$\pm$0.8 &\ 14348$^{6}$ & 33.1$\pm$5.8 & 96.8$\pm$10.3 & & & & & & 2.9$\pm$0.6 &\ & & 16.9$\pm$2.0 52.6$\pm$2.4 & 34.4$\pm$3.3 & 14.1$\pm$10.7 & & & 2.2$\pm$0.3\ **Table note:** For each interacting system, we measured the integrated flux of the individual galaxies by ISOCAM and marked southern and the northern galaxies (S) (N) respectively. used same as in Table for identifying the different sets of ISOCAM observations, labeled (1) through (6). As all three galaxies were observed with one with CVF, also the equivalent broad-band estimates (using the known filter band-passes based on those spectra marked with a $\dag$ ISOPHOT-S and (5) for the CVF. The errors for each measurement are statistical derived by adding 1$\sigma$ rms map to the systematic error of 10% commonly associated with the transient correction. uncertainties are estimated to $\pm$ 20$\%$. For cases
3.1 & 157.5$\pm$6.1 & 368.0$\pm$10.7 & 3.1$\pm$0.1 & 1.6$\pm$0.1\
23128$^{\dag}$ & 123.6$\pm$3.2 & & 70.0$\pm$3.6 & 163.0$\pm$4.9 & 134.5$\pm$4.8 & 140.4$\pm$14.2 & & & 1.8$\pm$0.1\

14348S$^{6}$ & 21.8$\pM$4.6 & 73.9$\pm$9.0 & & & & & & 3.4$\pm$0.8 &\
\
14348N$^{6}$ & 11.3$\pm$3.6 & 22.9$\pm$5.0 & & & & & & 2.0$\Pm$0.8 &\
\
14348$^{6}$ & 33.1$\pm$5.8 & 96.8$\pM$10.3 & & & & & & 2.9$\pm$0.6 &\
14348$^{\Dag}$ & 37.9$\Pm$1.6 & & 16.9$\Pm$2.0 & 52.6$\pm$2.4 & 34.4$\Pm$3.3 & 14.1$\pm$10.7 & & & 2.2$\Pm$0.3\

**Table note:** For EAch iNteracting system, we have MeasuReD The iNTeGrateD flux of THe INDivIdUaL gaLaXIeS resoLveD by ISOCaM and markeD thE sOuthern and thE NoRthern galaXieS with (S) and (N) reSpeCtivelY. WE usED the sAme NotatIons as IN Table 2 For identiFyINg the dIFferent SETs Of ISoCAM observations, lABeLEd (1) through (6). As all Three gAlAXiES WerE alSo observed WiTh ISOphOT-S and ONe WITH thE cVF, we also provIde the equivALenT broad-BaNd fILter flUx estImATes (Using the knoWn fiLter band-pAsses aND transmISsion cuRves) baSed On tHose SPeCtRa mArKEd wITh A $\daG$ For iSOPHOT-S AnD a (5) For thE CVF. tHE ERrorS giVen fOr eacH measurement aRe sTatiSTicAl derIved bY addInG the 1$\sIgma$ rmS map tO tHe systematic errOr of 10% Commonly aSsoCiAteD wIth thE TransiEnt CorRection. absolutE FluX uNCERtAinties are estimateD tO BE $\pM$ 20$\%$. For the cAses whERe
3.1 & 157.5$\pm$6.1 & 368. 0$\pm$10.7  & 3. 1$\ pm$ 0. 1 &1.6$ \pm$0.1\
23128 $ ^{\d ag}$ & 123.6$\pm$3.2 &  & 70 .0 $ \pm$ 3 .6  & 16 3.0$\pm $ 4. 9 & 1 34 .5 $\p m$ 4 .8  & 14 0.4 $\pm$14 .2 & & & 1 .8$ \p m$0.1\

1434 8 S$ ^{6}$ & 21 .8$ \pm$4.6 & 73 .9$ \pm$9. 0& & & & &  &3.4$\ pm$0.8 &\
\
1 4348N$^{6 }$ & 11.3 $ \pm$3.6 &  2 2.9$ \pm$5.0 & & & & & &2 .0$\pm$0.8 &\\
1434 8$ ^ {6 } $  &33. 1$\pm$5.8&96.8$ \ pm$10.3 && &  &&  & 2.9$\pm$0. 6 &\
14348$ ^ {\d ag}$ &  3 7.9 $ \pm$1. 6 & &  1 6 .9$ \pm$2.0 & 5 2.6$ \pm$2.4 &  34.4$ \ pm$3.3&  14.1$\ pm$10. 7 &  && 2. 2 $\ pm $0. 3\ 
** T ab len ote :** Forea ch  inte ract i n g syst em,  wehavemeasured theint egra t edfluxof th e in di vidua l gala xiesre solved by ISOCA M an d markedthe  s out he rn an d  the n ort her n galax ies wit h  (S )a n d  ( N) respectively. W eu s ed  the sam e nota t io ns as in Ta bl e 2  for i denti fyin g  t he diffe rent s e ts  o f ISOCA Mobserv at ion s,label e d (1 ) thro ugh (6).  As a l l three galaxi e s were also o b se r v ed with  IS OPHOT-S and  one with  the CV F,w e als o pro vi d et he equivalent broad -b and fi lterflux estimate s (using t h e known fi lter ba n d-passes and t ransm ission cur v es) base d onthose sp ectra mar k e d with a  $\ dag $ f orI S OP HOT-S and a ( 5 )  for  t he CVF.  Th e error s g ive n f orea ch measur ement ar est at is tic al de r ived byad din gthe  1$\s i gma$ r ms ma p to  t he sys tematic er r o r of  1 0%  com mon ly  asso ciat e d w ith the  transien t c o rrec ti on . Absol ute flux unce rt ainties ar eest imated t o be $\p m$ 20$\%$. For the case s  where
3.1 &_157.5$\pm$6.1 &_368.0$\pm$10.7 & 3.1$\pm$0.1 &_1.6$\pm$0.1\
23128$^{\dag}$ &_123.6$\pm$3.2_& &_70.0$\pm$3.6_& 163.0$\pm$4.9 &_134.5$\pm$4.8 & 140.4$\pm$14.2_& & & 1.8$\pm$0.1\

14348S$^{6}$_& 21.8$\pm$4.6 &_73.9$\pm$9.0_& & & & & & 3.4$\pm$0.8 &\
\
14348N$^{6}$ & 11.3$\pm$3.6 & 22.9$\pm$5.0 & &_&_& &_&_2.0$\pm$0.8_&\
\
14348$^{6}$ & 33.1$\pm$5.8 & 96.8$\pm$10.3_& & & & &_& 2.9$\pm$0.6_&\
14348$^{\dag}$ & 37.9$\pm$1.6 & & 16.9$\pm$2.0 & 52.6$\pm$2.4_&_34.4$\pm$3.3 & 14.1$\pm$10.7_& & & 2.2$\pm$0.3\

**Table note:** For each interacting system,_we have measured the integrated flux_of the individual_galaxies_resolved_by ISOCAM and marked_the southern and the northern galaxies_with (S) and (N) respectively. We_used the same notations as in Table_2 for identifying the different sets_of ISOCAM observations, labeled (1)_through (6)._As all three galaxies were_also observed with_ISOPHOT-S and_one with the_CVF, we also provide the equivalent_broad-band filter flux_estimates (using the known filter band-passes_and_transmission curves) based_on_those_spectra marked_with a $\dag$_for_ISOPHOT-S and_a_(5) for the CVF. The errors_given_for each measurement are statistical derived by_adding the 1$\sigma$ rms_map_to the systematic error_of 10% commonly associated with_the transient correction. Absolute flux uncertainties_are estimated_to be_$\pm$ 20$\%$. For the cases where