 will never occupy. In @Albers, the pristine region was simply the part of the circular forest between its center and the ring of maximum profit. In general, however, the pristine region must be defined differently. We assume that extractors will extract anywhere where the profit is close to the maximum possible profit. Denote $P_{max}$ as the maximum expected profit, and $(1-\varepsilon)P_{max}$ as the lowest expected profit that the extractor will accept for some tolerance $\varepsilon$. We also assume that the extractors will take the optimal path away from their extraction point to the boundary of the region.

The pristine region is determined using the following algorithm.

1.  Find the equal profit contour corresponding to $(1 - \varepsilon)P_{max}$. The extractors will only extract within this high-profit region.

2.  Pick points inside the high-profit region uniformly at random, and calculate the optimal path from that point to the boundary of the region. The optimal path can be found easily by solving the gradient descent equation $${\frac{\mathrm d\vec x}{\mathrm dt}}=-\nabla C_{B(\vec x_0)}(\vec x),$$ where $\vec x(0)=\vec x_0$ and $C_{B(\vec x_0)}(\vec x)$ is the cost function associated with the benefit value at the extraction point $\vec x_0$.

3.  The non-pristine region includes the high-profit region, and all points within some (small) distance of one of the optimal paths found in the previous step. The rest of the region is pristine, and is not traversed by extractors.

Metrics for Measuring Patrol Effectiveness
------------------------------------------

To measure the effectiveness of a given patrol strategy $\psi$, we use two metrics, although others could be used. A simple measure, as used in @Albers, is to calculate the proportion of the protected area that is pristine, using, $$\textrm{Pristine Proportion} = \frac{\int_{\Omega} \chi(x,y)\,\mathrm d x\,\mathrm d y}{\int_\Omega\,\mathrm dx\,\mathrm dy},$$ where $\chi(x,y)$ is an indicator function which is 1 in the pristine region and 0 in the non-pristine region.

Some parts of the protected region may be more valuable to protect than other regions, and we could instead choose to measure the proportion of the net value protected using the
will never occupy. In @Albers, the pristine region was simply the part of the round forest between its plaza and the ring of maximum net income. In general, however, the pristine area must be defined differently. We assume that extractor will extract anywhere where the profit is near to the maximum possible net income. Denote $ P_{max}$ as the maximum expected profit, and $ (1-\varepsilon)P_{max}$ as the lowest expect profit that the centrifuge will accept for some tolerance $ \varepsilon$. We besides assume that the extractors will take the optimum path away from their extraction point to the boundary of the area. 

 The pristine region is specify using the following algorithm. 

 1.   Find the equal net income contour corresponding to $ (1 - \varepsilon)P_{max}$. The extractors will only extract within this high - profit area. 

 2.   Pick point inside the high - profit region uniformly at random, and calculate the optimal path from that point to the boundary of the region. The optimum way can be found easily by solving the gradient origin equation $ $ { \frac{\mathrm d\vec x}{\mathrm dt}}=-\nabla C_{B(\vec x_0)}(\vec x),$$ where $ \vec x(0)=\vec x_0 $ and $ C_{B(\vec x_0)}(\vec x)$ is the cost function consociate with the benefit value at the extraction point $ \vec x_0$. 

 3.   The non - pristine region includes the eminent - profit region, and all points within some (small) distance of one of the optimal paths rule in the previous step. The rest of the region is pristine, and is not traverse by extractors. 

 prosody for Measuring Patrol Effectiveness 
 ------------------------------------------ 

 To measure the effectiveness of a given patrol strategy $ \psi$, we use two metric unit, although others could be used. A simple measure, as use in @Albers, is to calculate the proportion of the protected area that is pristine, use, $ $ \textrm{Pristine Proportion } = \frac{\int_{\Omega } \chi(x, y)\,\mathrm d x\,\mathrm d y}{\int_\Omega\,\mathrm dx\,\mathrm dy},$$ where $ \chi(x, y)$ is an index function which is 1 in the pristine region and 0 in the non - pristine region. 

 Some parts of the protected area may be more valuable to protect than other regions, and we could instead choose to measure the symmetry of the net value protected using the
 wipl never occupy. In @Alberr, the pristine tetion wes simpmy the pxrt of the circular forest bxtwewn itw center and the ring uf maximul profit. In jeneral, however, vge prisbnne rsnion knst be defined cifferentlf. We assume thdt ertractors will extract anywhere wherq the ptovit is close tj tht mwximhm possible profit. Denote $P_{max}$ as fhe maxpmum expected progit, and $(1-\varepsilon)P_{max}$ as hhe powest expected prlfit that tye evrractor will accept fog some toletance $\varepsilon$. We also assume ghat che extractirw wlnl take the optiial path awan from dheir ectraction poinb to vhe voundary of the regioi.

The pristine region is deterkiued using the followibg algotithm.

1.  Five tfe tquel lrofit coitour correaponding to $(1 - \varepsilon)P_{max}$. Tne vctractors wiml onlr qxtract within this high-profit region.

2.  Kick loints inside the high-peofit region uniformli at randoi, and calculate the optimal path from that point do thx couueary ud hhe region. The optimal path can be found easijg ny solving the gvadient descent eqiahipg $${\frac{\mathrm a\vec x}{\matgrm dt}}=-\nabla C_{B(\vec d_0)}(\vec x),$$ rhere $\vec x(0)=\vec x_0$ amd $C_{B(\vec x_0)}(\vec x)$ is the cost function asficiated with the bznefit value at jhe exyraction point $\vec x_0$.

3.  Tke non-lristine rehion inclhaes the high-profkt gegimn, and all points within sjme (small) discance of one of thq optimal oaths found in the previlus sjep. Tha rest of hhe region is pristine, and is not traversed bi eftrdctors.

Mecrics nor Measuring Pwtrol Effectivgness
------------------------------------------

To mzasure the effecniveness mf a given [atrol strateci $\psi$, we use vwo metriss, aothoygh othdfs could be usrd. A simple measure, as used in @Albers, is fo calculate thz kriportion of thr pfotqcned awaa that is psistkne, ising, $$\textrm{Kxisbind Prpportion} = \frac{\int_{\Omeca} \cgi(x,y)\,\mathrm d x\,\mathtm d y}{\int_\Onega\,\mathwm dx\,\mathrm du},$$ where $\chi(x,y)$ is aj indmcator funcyiog which is 1 in the pristine refion and 0 in the non-priseine region.

Some 'arts of the protected region may be morx valuable to protect jhan other regions, anb ee could inxtead choose tm measure the proporrion of the net vslue protected using fhe
will never occupy. In @Albers, the pristine simply part of circular forest between of profit. In general, the pristine region be defined differently. We assume that will extract anywhere where the profit is close to the maximum possible profit. $P_{max}$ as the maximum expected profit, and $(1-\varepsilon)P_{max}$ as the lowest expected profit the will for tolerance $\varepsilon$. We also assume that the extractors will take the optimal path away from their point to the boundary of the region. The region is determined using following algorithm. 1. Find the profit corresponding to - The will only extract this high-profit region. 2. Pick points inside the high-profit region uniformly at random, and calculate the optimal from that the boundary the The path can be by solving the gradient descent equation dt}}=-\nabla C_{B(\vec x_0)}(\vec x),$$ where $\vec x(0)=\vec x_0$ $C_{B(\vec x_0)}(\vec is the cost function associated with benefit value at the extraction point $\vec x_0$. The non-pristine region includes the high-profit region, and all points within some (small) distance of the optimal paths found the previous step. rest the is and is traversed by extractors. Metrics for Measuring Patrol Effectiveness ------------------------------------------ To measure effectiveness of a given patrol strategy $\psi$, we use two others be used. A measure, as used in is calculate the proportion of area is Proportion} \frac{\int_{\Omega} d x\,\mathrm d y}{\int_\Omega\,\mathrm dy},$$ where $\chi(x,y)$ is an function which is 1 0 in the non-pristine region. Some parts of protected region may be more valuable to than other regions, and we could instead choose to measure the proportion the net using the
 will never occupy. In @Albers, thE pristine rEgion Was SimPlY the Part Of the circular fORest Between its center and the Ring oF mAXimuM PrOfit. IN generaL, HoWEVer, ThE pRisTiNE rEgion MusT be defiNed differeNtlY. WE assume that eXTrActors will ExtRact anywhere WheRe the pRoFit IS closE to The maXimum pOSsible Profit. DenOtE $p_{max}$ as THe maximUM ExPectEd profit, and $(1-\varepsILoN)p_{max}$ as the lowesT expecTeD PrOFIt tHat The extractOr Will aCCept for SOmE TOLerANce $\varepsilon$. we also assumE ThaT the exTrActORs will Take tHe OPtiMal path away From Their extrAction POint to tHE boundaRy of thE reGioN.

The PRiStIne ReGIon IS dEteRMinEd using tHe FoLlowiNg alGORIThm.

1.  FInd The eQual pRofit contour cOrrEspoNDinG to $(1 - \vaRepsiLon)P_{MaX}$. The eXtractOrs wiLl Only extract withIn thIs high-proFit ReGioN.

2.  PIck poINts insIde The High-proFit regiON unIfORMLy At random, and calculaTe THE oPtimal paTh from THaT pOInt to the BoUndAry oF THe regIon. THE oPtimal paTh can bE FoUnD easily By SolvinG tHe gRadIent dEScenT equatIon $${\frac{\mAthrm D\Vec x}{\mathrm dt}}=-\naBLa C_{B(\vec x_0)}(\vec x),$$ wHErE $\VEc X(0)=\Vec x_0$ And $c_{B(\vec x_0)}(\vec x)$ iS the COst fUnctIOn AssOCiateD with ThE BeNEfit value at the extraCtIon poiNt $\vec X_0$.

3.  The non-pristiNe region inCLUDes the hiGh-prOFiT Region, and all poInts wIthin some (sMAll) distaNce of One of the Optimal paTHS found in The PreVioUs sTEP. THe rest of the reGIOn is PrIstine, aNd iS not traVerSed By eXtrAcTors.

MetriCs for MeaSuRiNg paTroL EffeCTiveness
------------------------------------------

to MeaSuRe tHe effECtivenEss of A givEn PaTRol StrategY $\PsI$, WE use TwO mEtriCs, aLtHough OtheRS coUld be usEd. A simple MeaSUre, aS uSeD in @AlbeRs, is to calculaTe The proportIoN of The proTECted area That is pristine, using, $$\textRM{PristiNe PRoporTion} = \Frac{\int_{\OmEga} \Chi(x,y)\,\mAthRM d x\,\matHrm d y}{\iNt_\OmeGa\,\MatHRM dx\,\maTHRm Dy},$$ wHeRe $\chi(x,y)$ is aN INdiCator FuNctiOn which Is 1 in the pristine regIOn aNd 0 in the non-priStiNe reGIOn.

somE PaRTs oF tHE prOTEcted region may bE more valuaBlE To Protect thaN OthEr Regions, And we coUld inSTead choOse to measUre the proPoRtioN OF thE net value pRotected Using the
 will never occupy. In @Al bers, theprist ine  re gi on w as s imply the part of t he circular forest bet weenit s  cen t er  andthe rin g  o f max im um  pr of i t.  In g ene ral, ho wever, the  pr is tine regionm us t be defin eddifferently.  We  assum etha t  extr act ors w ill ex t ract a nywhere w he r e thep rofit i s cl oseto the maximum po s si b le profit. Den ote $P _{ m ax } $  as  th e maximumex pecte d  profit ,  a n d $(1 - \varepsilon)P _{max}$ ast helowest  e xpe c ted pr ofitth a t t he extracto r wi ll accept  for s o me tole r ance $\ vareps ilo n$.  Wea ls oass um e  th a tthe ext ractorswi ll  take  the o p t imal  pa th a way f rom their ext rac tion poi nt to  theboun da ry of  the r egion .
The pristine r egio n is dete rmi ne d u si ng th e  follo win g a lgorith m.

1.Fin dt h e  e qual profit contou rc o rr espondin g to $ ( 1-\ varepsil on )P_ {max } $ . The  ext r ac tors wil l only ex tr act wit hi n this  h igh -pr ofitr egio n.

2.   Pick p oints inside the hig h -profit regio n  u n i fo r mlyatrandom, and  cal c ulat e th e  o pti m al pa th fr om th a t point to the boun da ry ofthe r egion. The op timal path c a n be fou nd e a si l y by solving t he gr adient des c ent equa tion$${\frac {\mathrmd \ vec x}{\ mat hrm  dt }}= - \ na bla C_{B(\vec x _0)} (\ vec x), $$where $ \ve c x (0) =\v ec  x_0$ and  $C_{B(\ ve cx_ 0) }(\ vec x ) $ is the  c ost  f unc tiona ssocia ted w ithth eb ene fit val u ea t  the  e xt ract ion  p oint$\ve c  x_ 0$.

3.   The non -pr i stin ere gion in cludes the hi gh -profit re gi on,  and a l l  pointswithin some (small) dis t ance of  on e oftheoptimal p ath s foun d i n  the p reviou s ste p.  Th e resto f  t here gion is pr i s tin e, an dis n ot trav ersed by extractor s .
Metrics for M eas urin g Pa tro l  E f fec ti v ene s s 
-------------- ---------- -- - -- ---------- - --
T o measu re theeffec t iveness  of a giv en patrol  s trat e g y $ \psi$, weuse twometrics,a lthou g hother s c ould b euse d. Asimple mea sure,  as us ed  in @A lbers ,is to ca lculate the proportionof the  prot ect ed area t hat ispristine,  usi ng, $$\tex trm {Pr istin e P r oport ion} =\fr a c{\in t_{\ O mega} \ch i (x ,y) \ , \m athrm d x\, \ m a thr m d y }{\ i nt_\Om ega\ ,\mathrm dx\,\mat h rm dy},$$ wher e $\ c h i(x ,y) $  isan  indicator fun cti on w hich is1in the pris tine reg io n  and0 in t he non -pristi n e  r e gion.
Som e p arts of t hepr o tectedre gi o n maybe m or e valu able t o  pro t e ct than other re gions , and w e  co uld i ns tead ch o oseto measure  the propor tion o f th e net  valuepr otecte d u si ng the
 will_never occupy._In @Albers, the pristine_region was_simply_the part_of_the circular forest_between its center_and the ring of_maximum profit. In_general,_however, the pristine region must be defined differently. We assume that extractors will extract_anywhere_where the_profit_is_close to the maximum possible_profit. Denote $P_{max}$ as the_maximum expected_profit, and $(1-\varepsilon)P_{max}$ as the lowest expected profit_that_the extractor will_accept for some tolerance $\varepsilon$. We also assume that_the extractors will take the optimal_path away from_their_extraction_point to the boundary_of the region.

The pristine region is_determined using the following algorithm.

1. _Find the equal profit contour corresponding to_$(1 - \varepsilon)P_{max}$. The extractors will_only extract within this high-profit_region.

2. _Pick points inside the high-profit_region uniformly at_random, and_calculate the optimal_path from that point to the_boundary of the_region. The optimal path can be_found_easily by solving_the_gradient_descent equation_$${\frac{\mathrm d\vec x}{\mathrm_dt}}=-\nabla_C_{B(\vec x_0)}(\vec_x),$$_where $\vec x(0)=\vec x_0$ and $C_{B(\vec_x_0)}(\vec_x)$ is the cost function associated with_the benefit value at_the_extraction point $\vec x_0$.

3._ The non-pristine region includes_the high-profit region, and all points_within some_(small) distance_of one of the optimal paths found in the previous step._The rest of the region is_pristine, and is not_traversed by_extractors.

Metrics_for Measuring Patrol_Effectiveness
------------------------------------------

To_measure the_effectiveness of a given patrol strategy $\psi$,_we use_two metrics, although others could be_used. A simple measure,_as_used in @Albers, is to calculate_the proportion of the protected area_that is pristine, using, $$\textrm{Pristine_Proportion}_=_\frac{\int_{\Omega} \chi(x,y)\,\mathrm d x\,\mathrm d_y}{\int_\Omega\,\mathrm dx\,\mathrm dy},$$ where $\chi(x,y)$ is_an indicator function_which is 1 in the pristine region_and_0 in the non-pristine region.

Some parts_of_the protected region may be more_valuable_to_protect than other regions, and_we could instead choose to measure_the proportion of the net value protected using the