 them. In Section \[sec:Hipp\] we compare our spectrophotometric parallaxes to Hipparcos parallaxes and ask how these comparisons are affected by neglecting extinction. In Section \[sec:all\] we analyse our distances to the generality of stars, using kinematic correction factors to test for systematic biases in distances as functions of surface gravity or effective temperature, and to modify distance pdfs (Section \[sec:SBA\]). In Section \[sec:clusters\] we compare our distances to cluster stars with the established distances to their clusters. In Section \[sec:repeat\] we examine the scatter in the distances to the same star obtained from different spectra. In Section \[sec:Av\] we examine the distribution of extinctions to stars. Section \[sec:discuss\] sums up.

Methodology {#sec:method}
===========

As in B11 we start from the trivial Bayesian statement $$\pr(\hbox{model}|\hbox{data})={\pr(\hbox{data}|\hbox{model})\pr(\hbox{model})
\over\pr(\hbox{data})},$$ where “data” comprises the observed parameters and photometry of an individual star and “model” comprises a star of specified initial mass $\cM$, age $\tau$, metallicity $\hbox{[M/H]}$, and location. We use $p({\rm
model|data})$ either to calculate expectation values $\ex{x}$ and dispersions $\sigma_x$ of quantities of interest, such as the stars’s distance $x=s$ and parallax $x=\varpi$, by integrating $P({\rm model|data})$ times an appropriate power of $x$ through the space spanned by the model parameters $\hbox{[M/H]},\tau,\cM,\ldots$, or the pdf in distance modulus by marginalising $P({\rm model|data})$ over all model parameters other than distance.

A key role is played by the prior probability $\pr(\hbox{model})$, which reflects our prior knowledge of the Galaxy: massive young stars are rarely found far from the plane, while a star far from the plane is likely to be old and have sub-solar abundances. We have used the same three-component prior used in B11: $$\label{eq:priorofx}
  p(\hbox{model}) = p(\cM) \sum_{i=1}^3 p_i(\mh) \, p_i(\tau) \, p
them. In Section   \[sec: Hipp\ ] we compare our spectrophotometric parallaxes to Hipparcos parallaxes and ask how these comparisons are involve by neglect extinction. In Section   \[sec: all\ ] we analyse our distances to the generality of ace, using kinematic correction agent to quiz for systematic bias in distances as functions of airfoil gravity or effective temperature, and to modify distance pdfs (Section   \[sec: SBA\ ]). In Section   \[sec: clusters\ ] we compare our distance to bunch stars with the established distance to their clusters. In Section \[sec: repeat\ ] we examine the scatter in the distance to the same star obtained from unlike spectra. In Section \[sec: Av\ ] we examine the distribution of extinction to stars. part   \[sec: discuss\ ] sums up. 

 Methodology { # sec: method } 
 = = = = = = = = = = = 

 As in B11 we start from the trivial Bayesian statement $ $ \pr(\hbox{model}|\hbox{data})={\pr(\hbox{data}|\hbox{model})\pr(\hbox{model }) 
 \over\pr(\hbox{data})},$$ where “ datum ” comprises the observed parameters and photometry of an individual star and “ model ” comprises a asterisk of specified initial mass $ \cM$, age $ \tau$, metallicity $ \hbox{[M / H]}$, and location. We use $ p({\rm 
 model|data})$ either to calculate expectation values $ \ex{x}$ and dispersions $ \sigma_x$ of quantities of sake, such as the stars ’s distance $ x = s$ and parallax $ x=\varpi$, by integrate $ P({\rm model|data})$ time an appropriate power of $ x$ through the space spanned by the exemplar parameters $ \hbox{[M / H]},\tau,\cM,\ldots$, or the pdf in distance modulus by marginalising $ P({\rm model|data})$ over all model parameters early than distance. 

 A key role is played by the prior probability $ \pr(\hbox{model})$, which reflects our prior knowledge of the Galaxy: massive young stars are rarely found far from the plane, while a star far from the airplane is likely to be erstwhile and have sub - solar abundances. We have used the same three - component prior practice in B11: $ $ \label{eq: priorofx } 
   p(\hbox{model }) = p(\cM) \sum_{i=1}^3 p_i(\mh) \, p_i(\tau) \, p
 thfm. In Section \[sec:Hipp\] we gompare our specjriphotoketric parallabes to Hipparcos parallaxes end qsk hiw these comparisons afe affectvd by negoectmng extinction. Ii Sectiok \[fec:amp\] we enalyse our disjances to tha generality ox rtcrs, using kinematic correction factows to trsh for systematyc bpafes jn distances as functions of surfade gravpty or effective yemperature, and to modify fistwnce pdfs (Section \[sfc:SBA\]). In Sextiog \[wec:clusters\] de compare our distancgs to cluster stars with the estxblisked distancgs tl their clusvers. Ig Section \[seg:gepeat\] fe examone the scattev in vhe eistances to the same star obtained froi differett spectra. In Sectiin \[sec:Ae\] we exaoune tht dmstdibutiln kf extinctjons to staes. Section \[sec:discusx\] flks up.

Methodomogy {#sqc:iethod}
===========

As in B11 we start from the trivial Bagesian statement $$\pr(\hbox{nodel}|\hbox{data})={\pr(\hbox{daja}|\hbox{modej})\pr(\hbox{model})
\over\pr(\hbox{data})},$$ where “data” comprises tve obadrvtd paraowtfrs and photometry of an individual star and “ikdtl” bomprises a star jf specifiec lnojial mass $\cM$, aee $\tau$, mefallicity $\hbox{[M/H]}$, ajd locajion. Ww use $p({\rm
iodek|data})$ either to calculate ezpectation vcluws $\ex{x}$ and dispersnons $\sigma_x$ uf qoantitoes of interest, such as the stars’s dishance $x=s$ zvd parallax $x=\varoi$, ny hntegrating $P({\rm model|data})$ eimes an eppro'riate puwer of $x$ ehrough thf spaga spanned by the mldel karameders $\hbox{[M/J]},\tau,\cM,\ldots$, or the pdf in distaire modulus by mdrgpnalising $P({\rm kodel|data})$ ovew all model patameters jther than distznce.

A kxy role is pjayed by the [tior probabilmty $\pr(\hbov{modwl})$, wyich rewuects our priot knowledyt of the Gqlaxy: massive younn stats are rarely fouub dar from the plsne, whylv a sedr far from dhe olavr is uikely uj ne uld snd have sub-solar abgndahces. We have used yhc same thtee-componqnt prior usec in B11: $$\label{eq:priogofx}
  p(\huox{modrl}) = p(\cM) \sum_{i=1}^3 p_i(\mh) \, p_i(\tau) \, p
them. In Section \[sec:Hipp\] we compare our to parallaxes and how these comparisons In \[sec:all\] we analyse distances to the of stars, using kinematic correction factors test for systematic biases in distances as functions of surface gravity or effective and to modify distance pdfs (Section \[sec:SBA\]). In Section \[sec:clusters\] we compare our to stars the distances to their clusters. In Section \[sec:repeat\] we examine the scatter in the distances to the star obtained from different spectra. In Section \[sec:Av\] examine the distribution of to stars. Section \[sec:discuss\] sums Methodology =========== As B11 start the trivial Bayesian $$\pr(\hbox{model}|\hbox{data})={\pr(\hbox{data}|\hbox{model})\pr(\hbox{model}) \over\pr(\hbox{data})},$$ where “data” comprises the observed parameters and photometry of an individual star and “model” comprises star of mass $\cM$, $\tau$, $\hbox{[M/H]}$, location. We use either to calculate expectation values $\ex{x}$ of quantities of interest, such as the stars’s $x=s$ and $x=\varpi$, by integrating $P({\rm model|data})$ times appropriate power of $x$ through the space spanned the model parameters $\hbox{[M/H]},\tau,\cM,\ldots$, or the pdf in distance modulus by marginalising $P({\rm model|data})$ over parameters other than distance. key role is by prior $\pr(\hbox{model})$, reflects our knowledge of the Galaxy: massive young stars are rarely found far the plane, while a star far from the plane is be and have sub-solar We have used the three-component used in B11: $$\label{eq:priorofx} p(\cM) p_i(\mh) p
 them. In Section \[sec:Hipp\] we comPare our speCtropHotOmeTrIc paRallAxes to HipparcoS ParaLlaxes and ask how these coMpariSoNS are AFfEcted By negleCTiNG ExtInCtIon. in sEcTion \[sEc:aLl\] we anaLyse our disTanCeS to the generaLItY of stars, usIng Kinematic corRecTion faCtOrs TO test For SysteMatic bIAses in Distances As FUnctioNS of surfACE gRaviTy or effective tempERaTUre, and to modify DistanCe PDfS (sEctIon \[Sec:SBA\]). In SeCtIon \[seC:ClusterS\] We COMParE Our distances tO cluster staRS wiTh the eStAblIShed diStancEs TO thEir clusters. in SeCtion \[sec:rEpeat\] wE Examine THe scattEr in thE diStaNces TO tHe SamE sTAr oBTaIneD FroM differeNt SpEctra. in SeCTION \[sec:av\] wE exaMine tHe distributioN of ExtiNCtiOns to Stars. sectIoN \[sec:dIscuss\] Sums uP.

MEthodology {#sec:meThod}
===========

as in B11 we stArt FrOm tHe TriviAL BayesIan StaTement $$\pR(\hbox{moDEl}|\hBoX{DATa})={\Pr(\hbox{data}|\hbox{modeL})\pR(\HBoX{model})
\ovEr\pr(\hbOX{dAtA})},$$ Where “datA” cOmpRiseS THe obsErveD PaRameters And phoTOmEtRy of an iNdIviduaL sTar And “Model” COmprIses a sTar of speCifieD Initial mass $\cM$, aGE $\tau$, metalliciTY $\hBOX{[M/h]}$, And lOcaTion. We use $p({\rM
modEL|datA})$ eitHEr To cALculaTe expEcTAtIOn values $\ex{x}$ and dispeRsIons $\siGma_x$ oF quantities of Interest, suCH AS the starS’s diSTaNCe $x=s$ and parallaX $x=\varPi$, by integrATing $P({\rm mOdel|dAta})$ times An approprIATe power oF $x$ tHroUgh The SPAcE spanned by the MODel pArAmeters $\HboX{[M/H]},\tau,\cm,\ldOts$, Or tHe pDf In distancE modulus By MaRgInAliSing $P({\RM model|daTa})$ OveR aLl mOdel pARameteRs othEr thAn DiSTanCe.

A key rOLe IS PlayEd By The pRioR pRobabIlitY $\Pr(\hBox{modeL})$, which refLecTS our PrIoR knowleDge of the GalaxY: mAssive younG sTarS are raRELy found fAr from the plane, while a staR Far from The Plane Is liKely to be oLd aNd have Sub-SOlar abUndancEs. We hAvE usED The saME ThRee-CoMponent priOR UseD in B11: $$\lAbEl{eq:PriorofX}
  p(\hbox{model}) = p(\cM) \sum_{i=1}^3 P_I(\mh) \, P_i(\tau) \, p
 them. In Section \[sec:Hi pp\] we co mpare  ou r s pe ctro phot ometric parall a xesto Hipparcos parallaxe s and  a s k ho w  t hesecompari s on s are  a ff ect ed by  negl ect ing ext inction. I n S ec tion \[sec:a l l\ ] we analy seour distance s t o thege ner a lityofstars , usin g  kinem atic corr ec t ion fa c tors to t es t fo r systematic bias e si n distances as  funct io n so f  su rfa ce gravity  o r eff e ctive t e mp e r a tur e , and to modi fy distance pdf s (Sec ti on\ [sec:S BA\]) .I n S ection \[se c:cl usters\]we com p are our distanc es toclu ste r st a rs  w ith  t h e e s ta bli s hed  distanc es  t o the ir c l u s t ers.  In  Sec tion\[sec:repeat\ ] w e ex a min e the  scat terin  thedistan ces t othe same star o btai ned fromdif fe ren tspect r a. InSec tio n \[sec :Av\] w e  ex am i n e  t he distribution of  e x t in ctions t o star s .Se c tion \[s ec :di scus s \ ] sum s up . 
Methodol ogy {# s ec :m ethod}== ====== == =
Asin B1 1  westartfrom the  triv i al Bayesian st a tement $$\pr( \ hb o x {m o del} |\h box{data})= {\pr ( \hbo x{da t a} |\h b ox{mo del}) \p r (\ h box{model})
\over\p r( \hbox{ data} )},$$ where “ data” comp r i s es the o bser v ed parameters and  phot ometry ofa n indivi dualstar and  “model”c o mprisesa s tar  of  sp e c if ied initial m a s s $\ cM $, age$\t au$, me tal lic ity  $\ hb ox{[M/H]} $, and l oc at io n.  We  use$ p({\rm
m od el| da ta} )$ ei t her to  calc ulat eex p ect ation v a lu e s  $\e x{ x} $ an d d is persi ons$ \si gma_x$of quanti tie s  ofin te rest, s uch as the st ar s’s distan ce  $x =s$ an d parallax  $x=\varpi$, by integra t ing $P( {\r m mod el|d ata})$ ti mes  an ap pro p riatepowerof $x $thr o u gh th e sp ace  s panned byt h e m odelpa rame ters $\ hbox{[M/H]},\tau,\ c M,\ ldots$, or th e p df i n di sta n ce mod ul u s b y marginalising $ P({\rm mod el | da ta})$ over all  m odel pa rameter s oth e r thandistance. 

A key r ol e is p lay ed by theprior pr obability $\pr( \ hb ox{mo del })$, w hi chrefle cts ou r  pr ior k nowled ge  of th e Gal ax y: massi ve young stars are rare ly fou nd fa r f rom the p lan e , w hile a st ar f ar from th e p lan e islik e ly to  beo ld  an d  have  sub - solar abu n da nce s .  W e have used t h e s ame t hre e -compo nent  prior used in B1 1 : $$\label{eq: prio r o fx} 
 p (\hb ox {model}) = p(\ cM)  \ s u m_{i=1}^ 3p_i(\mh) \,  p_i(\ta u) \, p
 them._In Section \[sec:Hipp\]_we compare our spectrophotometric_parallaxes to_Hipparcos_parallaxes and_ask_how these comparisons_are affected by_neglecting extinction. In Section \[sec:all\]_we analyse our_distances_to the generality of stars, using kinematic correction factors to test for systematic biases_in_distances as_functions_of_surface gravity or effective temperature,_and to modify distance pdfs_(Section \[sec:SBA\]). In_Section \[sec:clusters\] we compare our distances to cluster stars_with_the established distances_to their clusters. In Section \[sec:repeat\] we examine the_scatter in the distances to the_same star obtained_from_different_spectra. In Section \[sec:Av\]_we examine the distribution of extinctions_to stars. Section \[sec:discuss\] sums up.

Methodology {#sec:method}
===========

As_in B11 we start from the trivial_Bayesian statement $$\pr(\hbox{model}|\hbox{data})={\pr(\hbox{data}|\hbox{model})\pr(\hbox{model})
\over\pr(\hbox{data})},$$ where “data” comprises_the observed parameters and photometry_of an_individual star and “model” comprises_a star of_specified initial_mass $\cM$, age_$\tau$, metallicity $\hbox{[M/H]}$, and location. We_use $p({\rm
model|data})$ either_to calculate expectation values $\ex{x}$ and_dispersions_$\sigma_x$ of quantities_of_interest,_such as_the stars’s distance_$x=s$_and parallax_$x=\varpi$,_by integrating $P({\rm model|data})$ times an_appropriate_power of $x$ through the space spanned_by the model parameters_$\hbox{[M/H]},\tau,\cM,\ldots$,_or the pdf in_distance modulus by marginalising $P({\rm_model|data})$ over all model parameters other_than distance.

A_key role_is played by the prior probability $\pr(\hbox{model})$, which reflects our prior_knowledge of the Galaxy: massive young_stars are rarely found_far from_the_plane, while a_star_far from_the plane is likely to be old_and have_sub-solar abundances. We have used the_same three-component prior used_in_B11: $$\label{eq:priorofx}
  p(\hbox{model}) = p(\cM)_\sum_{i=1}^3 p_i(\mh) \, p_i(\tau) \, p