}\[eqX\]\
&&\
Q\_2’&=&-Q\_2+Q\_1 -nT\_1p’Q\_2 \[eqq2\]\
&&\
Q\_1’&=&nT -(++ -)Q\_1+e\^Q\_2.\[eqq1\] It must be noticed that the first four equations are formally identical to those of Lindblom & Detweiler [@LD; @DL], but in terms of the new variables defined by Eq. (\[Wh\])–(\[Eh\]).

Boundary conditions
-------------------

We seek for solutions of the perturbation equations which are regular at the origin. Assuming that all variables near the center of the star have the form $x(r)=x(0)+O(r^2)$, and expanding equations (\[exH0\])–(\[eqq1\]) we find that the following relations must be satisfied at the origin: H\_[0]{}(0)&=&K(0)\[H00\]\
[V]{}(0)&=&-(0)\[V0\]\
[X]{}(0)&=&(\_0+p\_0)e\^[\_0/2]{} {(0)+K(0)}\
&&\[X0\]\
H\_[1]{}(0)&=&\[H10\]\
Q\_[2]{}(0)&=&Q\_[1]{}(0).\[q20\] The values of $\hat E_{lm}$ and $\hat\Sigma_{lm}$ at the origin are given by (\[exE\]), (\[exSigma\]) evaluated at $r=0$. Therefore, our equations admit three independent solutions, which are reduced to one by imposing appropriate boundary conditions at the surface of the star. The first is the vanishing of the Lagrangian pressure perturbation X(R\_s)=0;\[Xs0\] and the second is the vanishing of the radial flux Q\_1(R\_s)=0. Once we know the only independent solution at the surface of the star, the Zerilli function and its derivative can be computed in terms of the $H_1$ and $K$, as usual (see for example [@IP] and [@koj] for the expression of the Zerilli function in terms of $H_0$, $K$; the expression in terms of $H_1$ follows by applying Eq.(\[exH0\]) ): Z&=&r\^l(K-e\^H\_[1]{})\
Z’&=&r\^l(K.\

} \[eqX\]\ 
 & & \ 
 Q\_2’&=&-Q\_2+Q\_1 -nT\_1p’Q\_2 \[eqq2\]\ 
 & & \ 
 Q\_1’&=&nT -(++ -)Q\_1+e\^Q\_2.\[eqq1\ ] It must be noticed that the first four equations are formally identical to those of Lindblom & Detweiler [ @LD; @DL ], but in terms of the newfangled variable star defined by Eq. (\[Wh\])–(\[Eh\ ]). 

 Boundary conditions 
 ------------------- 

 We seek for solution of the perturbation equations which are even at the origin. Assuming that all variable near the center of the star get the form $ x(r)=x(0)+O(r^2)$, and expanding equations (\[exH0\])–(\[eqq1\ ]) we find that the following relations must be quenched at the origin: H\_[0]{}(0)&=&K(0)\[H00\]\ 
 [ V]{}(0)&=&-(0)\[V0\]\ 
 [ X]{}(0)&=&(\_0+p\_0)e\^[\_0/2 ] { } { (0)+K(0)}\ 
 & & \[X0\]\ 
 H\_[1]{}(0)&=&\[H10\]\ 
 Q\_[2]{}(0)&=&Q\_[1]{}(0).\[q20\ ] The values of $ \hat E_{lm}$ and $ \hat\Sigma_{lm}$ at the origin are yield by (\[exE\ ]), (\[exSigma\ ]) evaluated at $ r=0$. Therefore, our equation admit three autonomous solutions, which are reduce to one by imposing appropriate boundary conditions at the surface of the asterisk. The first is the vanishing of the Lagrangian pressure perturbation X(R\_s)=0;\[Xs0\ ] and the second is the vanishing of the radial flux Q\_1(R\_s)=0. Once we know the only independent solution at the surface of the star, the Zerilli function and its derivative can be computed in terms of the $ H_1 $ and $ K$, as usual (see for example [ @IP ] and [ @koj ] for the expression of the Zerilli affair in terms of $ H_0 $, $ K$; the expression in term of $ H_1 $ follow by applying Eq.(\[exH0\ ]) ): Z&=&r\^l(K - e\^H\_[1]{})\ 
 Z’&=&r\^l(K.\
}\[eqX\]\
&&\
E\_2’&=&-Q\_2+Q\_1 -nT\_1p’Q\_2 \[eqq2\]\
&&\
Q\_1’&=&nT -(++ -)Q\_1+e\^Q\_2.\[eqq1\] Lt must be noticgd that vhe firat four dquations are formally identmcal to tyose of Lindblom & Detwdiler [@LD; @FL], but ib tecms of the new vediables definsf by Xq. (\[Wh\])–(\[Eh\]).

Boundary conditionv
-------------------

We seek for smljtnons of the perturbation equations wrich arr gegular at the oribyn. Aasuming that all variables near ths centeg of the star havr the form $x(r)=x(0)+O(r^2)$, and expanfing equations (\[exH0\])–(\[eqq1\]) ae find thaj thq following rdlations mlvt be satiafied at the origin: H\_[0]{}(0)&=&K(0)\[H00\]\
[V]{}(0)&=&-(0)\[V0\]\
[X]{}(0)&=&(\_0+p\_0)e\^[\_0/2]{} {(0)+K(0)}\
&&\[X0\]\
F\_[1]{}(0)&=&\[H10\]\
Q\_[2]{}(0)&=&Q\_[1]{}(0).\[q20\] The valuew if $\jdt E_{lm}$ and $\iat\Sigia_{lm}$ at the origin ase givem by (\[exE\]), (\[exSigka\]) xvalyated at $r=0$. Therefore, mur equations admij three inge'endent solutions, whixh are teducad tu ond bg mmpksing wppcopriate bohndary condutions at the surfave if the star. Tge firft is the vanishing of the Lagrangian prevsude perturbation X(R\_s)=0;\[Xs0\] abd the second is the ganishing of the radial flux Q\_1(R\_s)=0. Once we know the only indapendxng silmtiov ah the surface of the star, the Zerilli functiog amd its derivativc can be computed on trtms of the $H_1$ avd $K$, as uaual (see for examppe [@IP] agd [@koh] for the exptession of the Zerilli funcrion in termf of $H_0$, $K$; the expresdion in teros og $H_1$ fpllows by applying Eq.(\[exK0\]) ): Z&=&r\^l(I-e\^H\_[1]{})\
Z’&=&r\^l(K.\

}\[eqX\]\ &&\ Q\_2’&=&-Q\_2+Q\_1 -nT\_1p’Q\_2 \[eqq2\]\ &&\ Q\_1’&=&nT It be noticed the first four those Lindblom & Detweiler @DL], but in of the new variables defined by (\[Wh\])–(\[Eh\]). Boundary conditions ------------------- We seek for solutions of the perturbation equations which regular at the origin. Assuming that all variables near the center of the have form and equations (\[exH0\])–(\[eqq1\]) we find that the following relations must be satisfied at the origin: H\_[0]{}(0)&=&K(0)\[H00\]\ [V]{}(0)&=&-(0)\[V0\]\ {(0)+K(0)}\ &&\[X0\]\ H\_[1]{}(0)&=&\[H10\]\ Q\_[2]{}(0)&=&Q\_[1]{}(0).\[q20\] The values of $\hat and $\hat\Sigma_{lm}$ at the are given by (\[exE\]), (\[exSigma\]) at Therefore, our admit independent which are reduced one by imposing appropriate boundary conditions at the surface of the star. The first is the vanishing the Lagrangian X(R\_s)=0;\[Xs0\] and second the of the radial Once we know the only independent surface of the star, the Zerilli function and derivative can computed in terms of the $H_1$ $K$, as usual (see for example [@IP] and for the expression of the Zerilli function in terms of $H_0$, $K$; the expression in $H_1$ follows by applying ): Z&=&r\^l(K-e\^H\_[1]{})\ Z’&=&r\^l(K.\
}\[eqX\]\
&&\
Q\_2’&=&-Q\_2+Q\_1 -nT\_1p’Q\_2 \[eqq2\]\
&&\
Q\_1’&=&nT -(++ -)Q\_1+e\^Q\_2.\[eqq1\] It mUst be noticEd thaT thE fiRsT fouR equAtions are formaLLy idEntical to those of LindblOm & DetWeILer [@Ld; @dL], But in Terms of THe NEW vaRiAbLes DeFInEd by EQ. (\[Wh\])–(\[eh\]).

BoundAry conditiOns
-------------------

we Seek for solutIOnS of the pertUrbAtion equatioNs wHich arE rEguLAr at tHe oRigin. assumiNG that aLl variablEs NEar the CEnter of THE sTar hAve the form $x(r)=x(0)+O(r^2)$, anD ExPAnding equationS (\[exH0\])–(\[eqQ1\]) wE FiND ThaT thE following ReLatioNS must be SAtISFIed AT the origin: H\_[0]{}(0)&=&K(0)\[H00\]\
[v]{}(0)&=&-(0)\[V0\]\
[X]{}(0)&=&(\_0+p\_0)e\^[\_0/2]{} {(0)+K(0)}\
&&\[X0\]\
H\_[1]{}(0)&=&\[H10\]\
Q\_[2]{}(0)&=&Q\_[1]{}(0).\[Q20\] the Values Of $\Hat e_{Lm}$ and $\hAt\SigMa_{LM}$ at The origin arE givEn by (\[exE\]), (\[exsigma\]) eVAluated AT $r=0$. ThereFore, ouR eqUatIons ADmIt ThrEe INdePEnDenT SolUtions, whIcH aRe redUced TO ONE by iMpoSing ApproPriate boundarY coNditIOns At the SurfaCe of ThE star. the firSt is tHe Vanishing of the LAgraNgian presSurE pErtUrBatioN x(R\_s)=0;\[Xs0\] aNd tHe sEcond is The vaniSHinG oF THE rAdial flux Q\_1(R\_s)=0. Once we KnOW ThE only indEpendeNT sOlUTion at thE sUrfAce oF THe staR, the zErIlli funcTion anD ItS dErivatiVe Can be cOmPutEd iN termS Of thE $H_1$ and $K$, As usual (sEe for EXample [@IP] and [@koj] FOr the expressiON oF THe zErilLi fUnction in teRms oF $h_0$, $K$; thE expREsSioN In terMs of $H_1$ FoLLoWS by applying Eq.(\[exH0\]) ): Z&=&r\^l(k-e\^h\_[1]{})\
Z’&=&r\^l(K.\

}\[eqX\]\
&&\
Q\_2’&=&-Q\_ 2+Q\_1 -nT \_1p’ Q\_ 2 \ [e qq2\ ]\
& &\
Q\_1’&=&nT- (++-)Q\_1+e\^Q\_2.\[eqq1\ ] Itmu s t be no ticed  that t h ef i rst  f ou r e qu a ti ons a reformall y identica l t othose of Lin d bl om & Detwe ile r [@LD; @DL] , b ut inte rms of th e n ew va riable s  defin ed by Eq.  ( \ [Wh\]) – (\[Eh\] ) . 
Boun dary conditions
- - -- - -------------- 

We s ee k  f o r  so lut ions of th epertu r batione qu a t i ons which are reg ular at the ori gin. A ss umi n g that  allva r iab les near th e ce nter of t he sta r  have t h e form$x(r)= x(0 )+O (r^2 ) $,  a ndex p and i ng  eq u ati ons (\[e xH 0\ ])–(\ [eqq 1 \ ] )  wefin d th at th e following r ela tion s  mu st be  sati sfie dat th e orig in: H \_ [0]{}(0)&=&K(0) \[H0 0\]\
[V]{ }(0 )& =&- (0 )\[V0 \ ]\
[X] {}( 0)& =&(\_0+ p\_0)e\ ^ [\_ 0/ 2 ] { }{(0)+K(0)}\
&&\[X0 \] \ H\ _[1]{}(0 )&=&\[ H 10 \] \ 
Q\_[2]{ }( 0)& =&Q\ _ [ 1]{}( 0).\ [ q2 0\] Thevalues of  $ \hat E_ {l m}$ an d$\h at\ Sigma _ {lm} $ at t he origi n are given by (\[ex E \]), (\[exSig m a\ ] )  e v alua ted  at $r=0$.Ther e fore , ou r  e qua t ionsadmit  t h re e  independent soluti on s, whi ch ar e reduced toone by imp o s i ng appro pria t eb oundary condit ionsat the sur f ace of t he st ar. Thefirst ist h e vanish ing  of  th e L a g ra ngian pressur e pert ur bationX(R \_s)=0; \[X s0\ ] a ndth e secondis the v an is hi ng  of  ther adial fl ux  Q\ _1 (R\ _s)=0 .  Oncewe kn ow t he  o n lyindepen d en t solu ti on  atthe  s urfac e of the  star,the Zeril lif unct io nand its  derivative c an  be comput ed  in  terms o f the $H _1$ and $K$, as usual ( s ee forexa mple[@IP ] and [@k oj]  for t hee xpress ion of  theZe ril l i  func t i on  in  t erms of $H _ 0 $,$K$;th e ex pressio n in terms of $H_1 $  fo llows by appl yin g Eq . ( \[ exH 0 \] )  ):  Z & =&r \ ^ l(K-e\^H\_[1]{} )\
Z’&=&r\ ^l ( K. \

}\[eqX\]\
&&\
Q\_2’&=&-Q\_2+Q\_1 -nT\_1p’Q\_2_\[eqq2\]\
&&\
Q\_1’&=&nT -(++_-)Q\_1+e\^Q\_2.\[eqq1\] It must be_noticed that_the_first four_equations_are formally identical_to those of_Lindblom & Detweiler [@LD;_@DL], but in_terms_of the new variables defined by Eq. (\[Wh\])–(\[Eh\]).

Boundary conditions
-------------------

We seek for solutions of the_perturbation_equations which_are_regular_at the origin. Assuming that_all variables near the center_of the_star have the form $x(r)=x(0)+O(r^2)$, and expanding equations_(\[exH0\])–(\[eqq1\])_we find that_the following relations must be satisfied at the origin:_H\_[0]{}(0)&=&K(0)\[H00\]\
[V]{}(0)&=&-(0)\[V0\]\
[X]{}(0)&=&(\_0+p\_0)e\^[\_0/2]{} {(0)+K(0)}\
&&\[X0\]\
H\_[1]{}(0)&=&\[H10\]\
Q\_[2]{}(0)&=&Q\_[1]{}(0).\[q20\] The values of $\hat_E_{lm}$ and $\hat\Sigma_{lm}$_at_the_origin are given by_(\[exE\]), (\[exSigma\]) evaluated at $r=0$. Therefore,_our equations admit three independent solutions,_which are reduced to one by imposing_appropriate boundary conditions at the surface_of the star. The first_is the_vanishing of the Lagrangian pressure_perturbation X(R\_s)=0;\[Xs0\] and_the second_is the vanishing_of the radial flux Q\_1(R\_s)=0. Once_we know the_only independent solution at the surface_of_the star, the_Zerilli_function_and its_derivative can be_computed_in terms_of_the $H_1$ and $K$, as usual_(see_for example [@IP] and [@koj] for the_expression of the Zerilli_function_in terms of $H_0$,_$K$; the expression in terms_of $H_1$ follows by applying Eq.(\[exH0\])_): Z&=&r\^l(K-e\^H\_[1]{})\
Z’&=&r\^l(K.\
