-F bonds in the eclipsed conformation. Figure 2 shows as function of rotation of the carbon-sulfur bond the atom centered partial charges obtained for the triflic acid molecule. The sulfur-oxygen(hydroxyl) rotational potential energy surface possesses two physically equivalent minima (Figure 3). The lowest barrier between these minima corresponds to the proton directed axially, out into the solvent and has an energy of 2.0 kcal/mol. Electrostatic solvation substantially flattens that barrier so that the maximum free energy between the two minima is less than one kcal/mol. This stabilization of the barrier configuration is due to the better access of the proton to the solvent. The position of a probe water molecule interacting with triflic acid was determined by fully optimizing the pair of molecules at the MP2 level using both the 6-31G\*\* and D95\*\* basis sets. Recently, Ricchiardi and Ugliengo [@Ricchiardi] reported a geometry optimization of triflic acid plus a water molecule at the SCF/DZP level. Their result is qualitatively similar but quantitatively substantially different from that presented below. Because our results differed from those previous ones, several different basis sets and starting conditions were considered. The differences we observed among those optimizations were slight and do not account for the differences with the previous work that are likely traceable to different level of effort in achieving the optimum structure. Our results are shown in Figure 4. That structure is of lower energy than the structure reported by Ricchiardi and Ugliengo. However, our experience with this optimization is that the triflic-acid-water configurations are floppy as might be expected from noncovalent hydrogen-bonding interactions. For example, we several times found a local minimum of the energy surface with the exterior proton of Figure 4 directed into the plane of that drawing. Potential energy minima of that sort are only slightly higher in energy, of the order of one kcal/mol, than the structure shown. Note that the dihedral angle positioning the triflic acid proton is nearly the same in the minimum energy complex and the minimum energy triflic acid molecule (Figure 3). The floppiness of these structures is consistent with the prediction of the dielectric solvation model that free energy varies only gently with disposition of the acid proton in the region between the two minima (Figure 3). Attempts were made to determine a minimum energy conformation for triflate-hydronium ion pair but those configurations always relaxed to the optimum geometry of
-F bonds in the eclipsed conformation. Figure 2 show as affair of rotation of the carbon - sulfur bond the atom centered fond charges obtained for the triflic acid molecule. The sulfur - oxygen(hydroxyl) rotational likely department of energy surface possesses two physically equivalent minima (Figure 3). The lowest barrier between these minima corresponds to the proton directed axially, out into the solution and has an energy of 2.0 kcal / mol. Electrostatic solvation substantially flattens that barrier so that the maximal free energy between the two minima is less than one kcal / mol. This stabilization of the barrier shape is due to the good entree of the proton to the solvent. The position of a probe water atom interacting with triflic acid was determined by fully optimizing the pair of molecule at the MP2 level using both the 6 - 31G\*\ * and D95\*\ * basis sets. Recently, Ricchiardi and Ugliengo [ @Ricchiardi ] reported a geometry optimization of triflic acid plus a urine molecule at the SCF / DZP level. Their result is qualitatively similar but quantitatively substantially different from that presented below. Because our results differed from those previous ones, several different basis sets and starting condition were considered. The differences we observe among those optimization were slender and do not account for the differences with the previous work that are likely traceable to different level of campaign in achieving the optimum structure. Our results are shown in Figure 4. That structure is of lower department of energy than the structure reported by Ricchiardi and Ugliengo. However, our experience with this optimization is that the triflic - acid - water configurations are floppy as might be expected from noncovalent hydrogen - bonding interactions. For model, we several times found a local minimum of the energy surface with the exterior proton of trope 4 directed into the plane of that drawing. Potential energy minima of that sort are only slightly high in energy, of the decree of one kcal / mol, than the structure read. Note that the dihedral slant positioning the triflic acid proton is nearly the same in the minimum department of energy complex and the minimum energy triflic acid atom (Figure 3). The floppiness of these structures is consistent with the prediction of the dielectric solvation model that free energy varies only gently with disposition of the acid proton in the region between the two minima (Figure 3). Attempts were make to determine a minimum department of energy conformation for triflate - hydronium ion pair but those configurations always relaxed to the optimum geometry of
-F blnds in the eclipsed connormation. Figure 2 shows as fuhction ow rotation of the carbon-sulfnr bind tye atom centered partixl charged obtainwd fie the triflic acid molechpe. Tke sulfur-oxygen(hidroxyl) rotadional potentidl euergy surface possesses two physicaljy equifapent minima (Fidure 3). The lowest barrier between these minija corrtsponds to the proyon directed axially, out ijto hhe solvent and had an energy of 2.0 jcal/mol. Elecgrostatic solvation sugstantially flattens that barridr so that the nazimkk free enerjy betreen the two minima hs less than one kcal/kol. Thus stabilization of tie barrier configurajion is dua co the better access if the krotot to rhe somvxnt. The plsivion of a pdobe water nolecule interactinb rpyh triflic adid waf qetermined by fully optimizing the pair of molecules at the MP2 lecel using both the 6-31G\*\* wnd D95\*\* basys sets. Recently, Ricchiardi and Ugliengo [@Ricchiargi] re'ofteb a geunehry optimization of triflic acid plus a water jokebule at the SCF/DZI level. Their resukt ix qualitativeli similcd gut quantitatively substagtialoy differtnt ftom that presented below. Bexause our refylts differed from those prevnous omes, srveral different basis rets and startijg conditjuns were considefed. Tve differences we observed among thise pptimizxtioms werq slight ajd do not account for thf difyerenwes with tje previous work that are likelb traceable tp gifxerent lzvel on effort in achyeving the optnmum strbcture. Our resulns are shmwn in Figuwe 4. That struwjure is of loxer energr thqn tye struzgure reported ny Ricchicxdi and Utliengo. However, ouv expgrjence with this opuinization is thst ghe tgifkis-dcid-water cotfigjragoons xre flok'y cs mignt be expected from tonckvalent hydrogen-bomdlng interqctions. Sor example, wr several times foknd a loral mimimom of the energy surface with tge exterilr iroton of Figtre 4 directed inco the plane of that drawing. Potential eiergy minima of that soet are only slightli hlgher in enecgy, of the ordes of one kcal/mol, thab the structure smown. Note that the dihsdral dngle positioning the triflic acid proton is nearly the same in the minimum enwrgy complex and tge monimuk znexgy trislic ecid molecule (Figlre 3). The floppiness of these strnctures is cjnsistent with the predictiom uf the dielecjric solvation model that rree enetgy varies only gently with dislosition of the acid probon in thw regjon bensexn the two minima (Fibure 3). Cttemprs were madc to determine a kikimum enerhy cpnyormation for triflate-hydronium iin paie hut those confignrations alwwns relzxed tj the optimum gekmetdj of
-F bonds in the eclipsed conformation. Figure as of rotation the carbon-sulfur bond obtained the triflic acid The sulfur-oxygen(hydroxyl) rotational energy surface possesses two physically equivalent (Figure 3). The lowest barrier between these minima corresponds to the proton directed out into the solvent and has an energy of 2.0 kcal/mol. Electrostatic solvation flattens barrier that maximum free energy between the two minima is less than one kcal/mol. This stabilization of the configuration is due to the better access of proton to the solvent. position of a probe water interacting triflic acid determined fully the pair of at the MP2 level using both the 6-31G\*\* and D95\*\* basis sets. Recently, Ricchiardi and Ugliengo [@Ricchiardi] a geometry triflic acid a molecule the SCF/DZP level. is qualitatively similar but quantitatively substantially presented below. Because our results differed from those ones, several basis sets and starting conditions were The differences we observed among those optimizations were and do not account for the differences with the previous work that are likely traceable level of effort in the optimum structure. results shown Figure That structure of lower energy than the structure reported by Ricchiardi and Ugliengo. our experience with this optimization is that the triflic-acid-water configurations as be expected from hydrogen-bonding interactions. For example, several found a local minimum energy with of 4 into the plane of drawing. Potential energy minima of sort are only slightly order of one kcal/mol, than the structure shown. that the dihedral angle positioning the triflic proton is nearly the same in the minimum energy complex and the energy triflic (Figure 3). The floppiness of these structures is with the prediction of dielectric solvation model that free energy varies only gently disposition the acid in the region the two minima 3). Attempts were determine a energy for but those configurations always relaxed to optimum of
-F bonds in the eclipsed conforMation. FiguRe 2 shoWs aS fuNcTion Of roTation of the carBOn-suLfur bond the atom centereD partIaL CharGEs ObtaiNed for tHE tRIFliC aCiD moLeCUlE. The sUlfUr-oxygeN(hydroxyl) rOtaTiOnal potentiaL EnErgy surfacE poSsesses two phYsiCally eQuIvaLEnt miNimA (FiguRe 3). The lOWest baRrier betwEeN These mINima corRESpOnds To the proton directED aXIally, out into thE solveNt ANd HAS an EneRgy of 2.0 kcal/mOl. electROstatic SOlVATIon SUbstantially fLattens that BArrIer so tHaT thE MaximuM free EnERgy Between the tWo miNima is lesS than oNE kcal/moL. this staBilizaTioN of The bARrIeR coNfIGurATiOn iS Due To the betTeR aCcess Of thE PROTon tO thE solVent. THe position of a ProBe waTEr mOlecuLe intEracTiNg witH triflIc aciD wAs determined by fUlly OptimizinG thE pAir Of MolecULes at tHe Mp2 leVel usinG both thE 6-31g\*\* anD D95\*\* BASIs Sets. Recently, RicchiArDI AnD UgliengO [@RicchIArDi] REported a GeOmeTry oPTImizaTion OF tRiflic acId plus A WaTeR molecuLe At the ScF/dZP LevEl. TheIR resUlt is qUalitatiVely sIMilar but quantiTAtively substaNTiALLy DIffeRenT from that prEsenTEd beLow. BECaUse OUr resUlts dIfFErED from those previous oNeS, severAl difFerent basis seTs and startING ConditioNs weRE cONsidered. The difFerenCes we obserVEd among tHose oPtimizatIons were sLIGht and do Not AccOunT foR THe Differences wiTH The pReVious woRk tHat are lIkeLy tRacEabLe To differeNt level oF eFfOrT iN acHieviNG the optiMuM stRuCtuRe. Our REsults Are shOwn iN FIgURe 4. THat struCTuRE Is of LoWeR eneRgy ThAn the StruCTurE reportEd by RicchIarDI and ugLiEngo. HowEver, our experiEnCe with this OpTimIzatioN IS that the Triflic-acid-water configuRAtions aRe fLoppy As miGht be expeCteD from nOncOValent HydrogEn-bonDiNg iNTEractIONs. for ExAmple, we sevERAl tImes fOuNd a lOcal minImum of the energy surFAce With the exteriOr pRotoN OF FIguRE 4 dIRecTeD IntO THe plane of that drAwing. PotenTiAL eNergy minimA Of tHaT sort arE only slIghtlY Higher iN energy, of The order oF oNe kcAL/Mol, Than the strUcture shOwn. Note thAT the dIHeDral aNglE positIoNinG the tRiflic ACid ProtoN is neaRlY the saMe in tHe Minimum eNergy complex and the minimUm enerGy triFliC acid moleCulE (figUre 3). The floPpinEss of these StrUctUres iS coNSisteNt wiTH tHe pREdictIon oF The dielecTRiC soLVAtIon model thaT FREe eNergy VarIEs only GentLy with disposition OF the acid proton In thE REgiOn bETweeN tHe two minima (FigUre 3). atTEMpts were MaDe to determiNe a minimUm ENergy ConforMation For trifLATe-HYdroniUm ioN paIr but thosE coNfIGuratioNs AlWAys relAxed To The optImum geOMetrY OF
-F bonds in the eclipsed c onformatio n. Fi gur e 2  s hows  asfunction of ro t atio n of the carbon-sulfur  bond  t h e at o mcente red par t ia l cha rg es  ob ta i ne d for  th e trifl ic acid mo lec ul e. The sulfu r -o xygen(hydr oxy l) rotationa l p otenti al  en e rgy s urf ace p ossess e s twophysicall ye quival e nt mini m a  ( Figu re 3). The lowest ba r rier between t hese m in i ma c orr esp onds to th eproto n  direct e da x i all y , out into th e solvent a n d h as anen erg y  of 2. 0 kca l/ m ol.  Electrosta ticsolvation  subst a ntially flatten s that  ba rri er s o  t ha t t he max i mu m f r eeenergy b et we en th e tw o m i nima  is  les s tha n one kcal/mo l.This sta biliz ation  ofth e bar rier c onfig ur ation is due to  the  better a cce ss  of  t he pr o ton to  th e s olvent.  The po s iti on o f  a  probe water molec ul e in teractin g with tr if l ic acidwa s d eter m i ned b y fu l ly  optimiz ing th e  p ai r of mo le culesat  th e M P2 le v el u sing b oth the6-31G \ *\* and D95\*\ *  basis sets.R ec e n tl y , Ri cch iardi and U glie n go [ @Ric c hi ard i ] rep orted  a ge o metry optimizationof  trifl ic ac id plus a wat er molecul e a t the SC F/DZ P  l e vel. Their res ult i s qualitat i vely sim ilarbut quan titativel y substant ial lydif fer e n tfrom that pre s e nted  b elow. B eca use our  re sul tsdif fe red fromthose pr ev io us  o nes , sev e ral diff er ent  b asi s set s  and s tarti ng c on di t ion s werec on s i dere d.  T he d iff er ences  weo bse rved am ong those  op t imiz at io ns were  slight and d onot accoun tfor  the d i f ferences  with the previous work that ar e l ikely  tra ceable to  di fferen t l e vel of  effor t inac hie v i ng th e op tim um  structure . Our  resu lt s ar e shown  in Figure 4. That str ucture is oflow er e n e rg y t h an the  s t ruc t u re reported byRicchiardi  a n dUgliengo.H owe ve r, ourexperie nce w i th this  optimiza tion is t ha t th e tri flic-acid- water co nfigurati o ns ar e  f loppy  as  might  b e e xpect ed fro m  no ncova lent h yd rogen- bondi ng  interac tions. For example, wesevera l tim esfound a l oca l  mi nimum oftheenergy sur fac e w ith t hee xteri or p r ot ono f Fig ure4  directed in tot h eplane of th a t dra wing.  Po t ential  ene rgy minima of tha t  sort are only  sli g h tly  hi g herin  energy, of th e o rd e r  of onekc al/mol, tha n the st ru c tureshown.  Notethat th e di h edralangl e p ositionin g t he triflic  a ci d  proto n is  n earlythe sa m e in t he minimum energ y com p l ex an d  th e min im um ener g y tr iflic acid  molecule ( Figure  3).  Thefloppin es s of t hes estructures is consis tentwith th epred ict ion of  the d ielec tric  s olv ation mod e l  t h at  f r eeener gy va ri es o nly gentl y  with di spo s ition o fthe a cid pr o to n in the reg ion  betw e e n the twom inim a  ( F igure  3). A ttempt s werem ade  t o deter min e a minimum  energy c o nfo rm atio n for tr if late -h ydr on ium ion pair bu t thoseconfigur a t ions a lwa y s re l axed t othe optimumgeome tr y  of
-F bonds_in the_eclipsed conformation. Figure 2_shows as_function_of rotation_of_the carbon-sulfur bond_the atom centered_partial charges obtained for_the triflic acid_molecule._The sulfur-oxygen(hydroxyl) rotational potential energy surface possesses two physically equivalent minima (Figure 3). The_lowest_barrier between_these_minima_corresponds to the proton directed_axially, out into the solvent_and has_an energy of 2.0 kcal/mol. Electrostatic solvation substantially_flattens_that barrier so_that the maximum free energy between the two minima_is less than one kcal/mol. This_stabilization of the_barrier_configuration_is due to the_better access of the proton to_the solvent. The position of a_probe water molecule interacting with triflic acid_was determined by fully optimizing the_pair of molecules at the_MP2 level_using both the 6-31G\*\* and_D95\*\* basis sets._Recently, Ricchiardi_and Ugliengo [@Ricchiardi]_reported a geometry optimization of triflic_acid plus a_water molecule at the SCF/DZP level._Their_result is qualitatively_similar_but_quantitatively substantially_different from that_presented_below. Because_our_results differed from those previous ones,_several_different basis sets and starting conditions were_considered. The differences we_observed_among those optimizations were_slight and do not account_for the differences with the previous_work that_are likely_traceable to different level of effort in achieving the optimum structure._Our results are shown in Figure_4. That structure is_of lower_energy_than the structure_reported_by Ricchiardi_and Ugliengo. However, our experience with this_optimization is_that the triflic-acid-water configurations are floppy_as might be expected_from_noncovalent hydrogen-bonding interactions. For example, we_several times found a local minimum_of the energy surface with_the_exterior_proton of Figure 4 directed_into the plane of that drawing._Potential energy minima_of that sort are only slightly higher_in_energy, of the order of one_kcal/mol,_than the structure shown. Note that_the_dihedral_angle positioning the triflic acid_proton is nearly the same in_the minimum energy complex and the minimum energy triflic_acid molecule (Figure_3). The floppiness of these_structures_is_consistent with the prediction of the dielectric solvation model that_free energy_varies only gently_with disposition of the acid proton in the region between_the two minima (Figure 3). Attempts were_made to determine a minimum energy conformation for triflate-hydronium ion pair_but those configurations always relaxed to the optimum_geometry of