 halo dark matter with this captured dark matter. Once captured, it is expected to quickly thermalise with the ordinary matter within the Earth via the kinetic mixing interactions, to a temperature $T_E \sim 5000$ K (0.4 eV). If $m_{p_d}\gg $ MeV, this is much cooler than the halo temperature and the dark protons and dark electrons can potentially combine into neutral dark atoms. The dark sphere will be largely neutral (ionised) if $T_E \ll I$ ($T_E \gg I$), where $I$ is the dark atomic binding energy given already in Eq. (\[isis\]). This motivates two limiting cases: a neutral “Moon-like” case in which the dark sphere largely absorbs the dark plasma wind, and; an ionised “Venus-like” case in which the dark sphere largely deflects the dark plasma wind by way of a current-carrying sheet at the “dark ionopause” (located where the plasma wind and “dark ionosphere” pressures equilibrate). In addition to its ionisation state, the other defining feature of the dark sphere is its effective size. Let us define a parameter, $R_{DM}$, which corresponds to the dark plasma wind stopping radius for the Moon-like case, and the dark ionopause radius for the Venus-like case. We will now attempt to estimate $R_{DM}$ in terms of the fundamental plasma parameters. If the dark sphere is Moon-like, then the (relatively stationary) dark protons accumulate at the “geometric” rate $$\begin{aligned}
\frac{dN_{p_d}}{dt} \approx \pi R_{DM}^2 v_{rot} n_{p_d}
\. 
\label{1z}\end{aligned}$$ Dark electrons will be captured at a similar rate: $dN_{e_d}/dt = Z'dN_{p_d}/dt$ given the expected approximate $U(1)'$ charge neutrality of the Earth.[^4] This represents an upper bound for the accumulation rate in the Venus-like case, though it might still be a useful estimate so long as a significant fraction ($\gtrsim 1$%) of the halo wind is stopped within the Earth. Loss rates due to mechanisms such as thermal escape and dark atmospheric stripping are difficult to evaluate. Naturally, any estimate of the total amount of dark matter captured within the Earth is uncertain. Fortunately, it
halo dark matter with this captured dark matter. Once get, it is expect to quickly thermalise with the ordinary matter within the Earth via the kinetic desegregate interactions, to a temperature $ T_E \sim 5000 $   K (0.4   eV). If $ m_{p_d}\gg $   MeV, this is much cool than the ring temperature and the dark proton and blue electrons can potentially aggregate into neutral dark atom. The blue sphere will be largely neutral (ionised) if $ T_E \ll I$ ($ T_E \gg I$), where $ I$ is the dark atomic bind energy given already in Eq.   (\[isis\ ]). This motivates two specify cases: a neutral “ Moon - alike ” case in which the dark sphere largely absorbs the dark plasma fart, and; an ionised “ Venus - like ” case in which the dark sphere largely deflects the dark plasma wind by way of a current - carrying sheet at the “ dark ionopause ” (located where the plasma wind and “ dark ionosphere ” pressures balance). In accession to its ionisation department of state, the other defining feature of the dark sector is its effective size. Let us define a parameter, $ R_{DM}$, which corresponds to the blue plasma wind stopping radius for the Moon - like case, and the dark ionopause spoke for the Venus - like case. We will now attempt to estimate $ R_{DM}$ in terms of the fundamental plasma parameter. If the dark sphere is Moon - like, then the (relatively stationary) dark protons accumulate at the “ geometric ” pace $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 \frac{dN_{p_d}}{dt } \approx \pi R_{DM}^2 v_{rot } n_{p_d } 
 \. 
 \label{1z}\end{aligned}$$ Dark electrons will be captured at a similar rate: $ dN_{e_d}/dt = Z'dN_{p_d}/dt$ given the expected approximate $ U(1)'$ charge neutrality of the Earth.[^4 ] This represents an upper bind for the accumulation pace in the Venus - like case, though it might still be a useful estimate thus long as a significant fraction ($ \gtrsim 1$%) of the aura wind is intercept within the Earth. Loss rates due to mechanisms such as thermal escape and dark atmospheric denudation are difficult to evaluate. Naturally, any estimate of the full amount of dark matter captured within the Earth is uncertain. Fortunately, it
 hapo dark matter with this captured dark matter. Mnce czptured, kt is expected to quickly thxrmaoise qith the ordinary mattdr within the Earrh vma the kinetic mmsing inbzractjlns, co a temperature $T_E \sim 5000$ K (0.4 aV). If $m_{p_d}\gg $ MeE, ghns is much cooler than the halo tempqrature ajd the dark prjtonx and dark electrons can potentially cojbine iito neutral darl atoms. The dark sphere wipl bf largely neutral (lonised) if $J_S \lj I$ ($T_E \gg I$), wfere $I$ is uhz dark atomjc binding energy given already in Ea. (\[isis\]). This mitigdtes two linitind cases: a nemnral “Momn-like” vase in which bhe derk wphere largely absorbv the dark plasma rind, and; dn ionised “Venus-likw” xase hn wvich rhe dadk slhere parjely deflecfs the dark plasma wind by way os a current-cardying fhqet at the “dark ionopause” (located where ths plasma wind and “dark uonosphere” pressures gquilibratq). In addition to its ionisation state, the other dafiniig fecbmre ud hhe dark sphere is its effective size. Let us qsfonv a parameter, $R_{DM}$, which corrrsoomqs to the dary plasma sind stopping radiks for jhe Moin-like cafe, amd the dark ionopause radiuw for the Veuus-oike case. We will uow attempt co estomate $R_{DM}$ in terms of the fuudamenfal plasma oarametera. If the dark sphdre iv Moon-like, then the (relatidely statmonarv) dark pfotoms acctmulate at the “naometric” rate $$\begij{aligued}
\frdc{dN_{p_d}}{dt} \aoprox \pi R_{DM}^2 v_{rot} n_{p_d}
\. 
\label{1z}\end{ekigned}$$ Dark glewtrmns will be csptured at a fimilar rate: $dU_{e_d}/dt = Z'bN_{p_d}/dt$ given the expectxd approximaee $U(1)'$ charge naotrality of tie Earth.[^4] Ehis repeesents xn upper bound for the cecumulatiin rate in the Venms-likg dase, though it nigyt still be a uxefjl qsnimete sj long as a shgniwicxmt frxction ($\gtrslm 1$%) of yhe halo wind is sto[ped within the Earth. Kofs rates due to iechanisms suvh as thermal escake and dack atmpspreric stripping are difficult fo evaluahe. Katurally, any estlmatg of the tocal amount of dark matter captured withii the Earth is uncertaib. Fortunately, it
halo dark matter with this captured dark captured, is expected quickly thermalise with Earth the kinetic mixing to a temperature \sim 5000$ K (0.4 eV). If $ MeV, this is much cooler than the halo temperature and the dark and dark electrons can potentially combine into neutral dark atoms. The dark sphere be neutral if \ll I$ ($T_E \gg I$), where $I$ is the dark atomic binding energy given already in (\[isis\]). This motivates two limiting cases: a neutral case in which the sphere largely absorbs the dark wind, an ionised case which dark sphere largely the dark plasma wind by way of a current-carrying sheet at the “dark ionopause” (located where the wind and pressures equilibrate). addition its state, the other of the dark sphere is its us define a parameter, $R_{DM}$, which corresponds to dark plasma stopping radius for the Moon-like case, the dark ionopause radius for the Venus-like case. will now attempt to estimate $R_{DM}$ in terms of the fundamental plasma parameters. If the is Moon-like, then the stationary) dark protons at “geometric” $$\begin{aligned} \approx \pi v_{rot} n_{p_d} \. \label{1z}\end{aligned}$$ Dark electrons will be captured at a rate: $dN_{e_d}/dt = Z'dN_{p_d}/dt$ given the expected approximate $U(1)'$ charge the This represents an bound for the accumulation in Venus-like case, though it be useful as significant ($\gtrsim 1$%) of the wind is stopped within the Loss rates due to and dark atmospheric stripping are difficult to evaluate. any estimate of the total amount of matter captured within the Earth is uncertain. Fortunately, it
 halo dark matter with this capTured dark mAtter. oncE caPtUred, It is Expected to quicKLy thErmalise with the ordinarY mattEr WIthiN ThE EartH via the KInETIc mIxInG inTeRAcTions, To a TemperaTure $T_E \sim 5000$ K (0.4 EV). IF $m_{P_d}\gg $ MeV, this iS MuCh cooler thAn tHe halo temperAtuRe and tHe DarK ProtoNs aNd darK electROns can PotentialLy COmbine INto neutRAL dArk aToms. The dark sphere WIlL Be largely neutrAl (ioniSeD) If $t_e \Ll I$ ($t_E \gG I$), where $I$ is ThE dark ATomic biNDiNG ENerGY given already In Eq. (\[isis\]). ThiS MotIvates TwO liMIting cAses: a NeUTraL “Moon-like” caSe in Which the dArk sphERe largeLY absorbS the daRk pLasMa wiND, aNd; An iOnISed “vEnUs-lIKe” cAse in whiCh ThE dark SpheRE LARgelY deFlecTs the Dark plasma winD by Way oF A cuRrent-CarryIng sHeEt at tHe “dark IonopAuSe” (located where tHe plAsma wind aNd “dArK ioNoSpherE” PressuRes EquIlibratE). In addiTIon To ITS IoNisation state, the otHeR DEfIning feaTure of THe DaRK sphere iS iTs eFfecTIVe sizE. Let US dEfine a paRameteR, $r_{Dm}$, wHich corReSponds To The DarK plasMA winD stoppIng radiuS for tHE Moon-like case, aND the dark ionopAUsE RAdIUs foR thE Venus-like cAse. WE Will Now aTTeMpt TO estiMate $R_{dM}$ IN tERms of the fundamental PlAsma paRametErs. If the dark sPhere is MooN-LIKe, then thE (relATiVEly stationary) dArk prOtons accumULate at thE “geomEtric” ratE $$\begin{aliGNEd}
\frac{dN_{P_d}}{dT} \apProX \pi r_{dm}^2 v_{Rot} n_{p_d}
\. 
\label{1z}\eND{AligNeD}$$ Dark elEctRons wilL be CapTurEd aT a Similar raTe: $dN_{e_d}/dt = z'dn_{p_D}/dT$ gIveN the eXPected apPrOxiMaTe $U(1)'$ ChargE NeutraLity oF the eaRtH.[^4] thiS represENtS AN uppEr BoUnd fOr tHe AccumUlatIOn rAte in thE Venus-likE caSE, thoUgH iT might sTill be a useful EsTimate so loNg As a SignifICAnt fractIon ($\gtrsim 1$%) of the halo wind iS Stopped WitHin thE EarTh. Loss ratEs dUe to meChaNIsms suCh as thErmal EsCapE ANd darK ATmOspHeRic strippiNG Are DiffiCuLt to EvaluatE. Naturally, any estimATe oF the total amouNt oF darK MAtTer CApTUreD wIThiN THe Earth is uncertAin. FortunaTeLY, iT
 halo dark matter with thi s captured  dark  ma tte r.  Onc e ca ptured, it ise xpec ted to quickly thermal ise w it h  the or dinar y matte r  w i t hin  t he  Ea rt h  v ia th e k ineticmixing int era ct ions, to a t e mp erature $T _E\sim 5000$ K  (0 .4 eV) .If$ m_{p_ d}\ gg $MeV, t h is ismuch cool er than t h e halot e mp erat ure and the darkp ro t ons and dark e lectro ns ca n pot ent ially comb in e int o  neutra l  d a r k  at o ms. The darksphere will belargel yneu t ral (i onise d) if$T_E \ll I$  ($T _E \gg I$ ), whe r e $I$ i s  the da rk ato mic  bi ndin g  e ne rgy  g i ven al rea d y i n Eq. (\ [i si s\]).  Thi s m o tiva tes  two  limi ting cases: a  ne utra l  “M oon-l ike”case  i n whi ch the  dark  s phere largely a bsor bs the da rkpl asm awind, and; a n i oni sed “Ve nus-lik e ” c as e i nwhich the dark sph er e la rgely de flects th ed ark plas ma  wi nd b y way o f ac ur rent-car ryings he et  at the  “ dark i on opa use ” (lo c ated  where  the pla sma w i nd and “dark i o nosphere” pre s su r e se quil ibr ate). In ad diti o n to  its io nis a tionstate ,t he other defining feat ur e of t he da rk sphere isits effect i v e  size. L et u s  d e fine a paramet er, $ R_{DM}$, w h ich corr espon ds to th e dark pl a s ma windsto ppi ngrad i u sfor the Moon- l i ke c as e, andthe  dark i ono pau serad iu s for the  Venus-l ik eca se . W e wil l  now att em ptto  es timat e  $R_{D M}$ i n te rm so f t he fund a me n t al p la sm a pa ram et ers.If t h e d ark sph ere is Mo on- l ike,  t he n the ( relatively st at ionary) da rk  pr otonsa c cumulate  at the “geometric” rat e  $$\beg in{ align ed}\frac{dN_ {p_ d}}{dt } \ a pprox\pi R_ {DM}^ 2v_{ r o t} n_ { p _d }
\ .
\label{1z } \ end {alig ne d}$$  Dark e lectrons will be c a ptu red at a simi lar  rat e :  $ dN_ { e_ d }/d t=  Z' d N _{p_d}/dt$ give n the expe ct e dapproximat e  $U (1 )'$ cha rge neu trali t y of th e Earth.[ ^4] Thisre pres e n tsan upper b ound for  the accu m ulati o nrateinthe Ve nu s-l ike c ase, t h oug h itmightst ill be  a us ef ul estim ate so long as a signif icantfract ion  ($\gtrsi m 1 $ %)of the ha lo w ind is sto ppe d w ithin  th e  Eart h. L o ss  ra t es du e to mechanism s  s uch a sthermal esc a p e  an d dar k a t mosphe ricstripping are dif f icult to evalu ate. N atu ral l y, a ny  estimate of t heto t a l amount  o f dark matt er captu re d  with in the  Earth  is unc e r ta i n. For tuna tel y, it
 halo_dark matter_with this captured dark_matter. Once_captured,_it is_expected_to quickly thermalise_with the ordinary_matter within the Earth_via the kinetic_mixing_interactions, to a temperature $T_E \sim 5000$ K (0.4 eV). If $m_{p_d}\gg $ MeV, this is much_cooler_than the_halo_temperature_and the dark protons and_dark electrons can potentially combine_into neutral_dark atoms. The dark sphere will be largely_neutral_(ionised) if $T_E_\ll I$ ($T_E \gg I$), where $I$ is the_dark atomic binding energy given already_in Eq. (\[isis\]). This_motivates_two_limiting cases: a neutral_“Moon-like” case in which the dark_sphere largely absorbs the dark plasma_wind, and; an ionised “Venus-like” case in_which the dark sphere largely deflects_the dark plasma wind by_way of_a current-carrying sheet at the_“dark ionopause” (located_where the_plasma wind and_“dark ionosphere” pressures equilibrate). In addition_to its ionisation_state, the other defining feature of_the_dark sphere is_its_effective_size. Let_us define a_parameter,_$R_{DM}$, which_corresponds_to the dark plasma wind stopping_radius_for the Moon-like case, and the dark_ionopause radius for the_Venus-like_case. We will now_attempt to estimate $R_{DM}$ in_terms of the fundamental plasma parameters._If the_dark sphere_is Moon-like, then the (relatively stationary) dark protons accumulate at the_“geometric” rate $$\begin{aligned}
\frac{dN_{p_d}}{dt} \approx \pi R_{DM}^2_v_{rot} n_{p_d}
\. 
\label{1z}\end{aligned}$$ Dark_electrons will_be_captured at a_similar_rate: $dN_{e_d}/dt_= Z'dN_{p_d}/dt$ given the expected approximate $U(1)'$_charge neutrality_of the Earth.[^4] This represents an_upper bound for the_accumulation_rate in the Venus-like case, though_it might still be a useful_estimate so long as a_significant_fraction_($\gtrsim 1$%) of the halo_wind is stopped within the Earth._Loss rates due_to mechanisms such as thermal escape and_dark_atmospheric stripping are difficult to evaluate._Naturally,_any estimate of the total amount_of_dark_matter captured within the Earth_is uncertain. Fortunately, it