 band. The peak of the X-ray emission is coincident with the position of the cD galaxy. Although the Chandra detector does not cover the entire cluster X-ray extension, a connection between the mini-halo and the X-ray emission is evident, which is better investigated in the next section.

Comparison between mini-halos and the X-ray emitting gas
========================================================

By superimposing the radio and X-ray data presented in previous sections, we emphasized the similarity between the radio mini-halo emission and the cluster X-ray morphologies of A2029, A1835, and Ophiuchus. Because of the large angular extension of Ophiuchus, it is possible to perform a quantitative comparison between the radio and X-ray brightness. Here we compare the Chandra count rate image in the $0.5-4$ keV band, with the VLA radio image, corrected for the primary beam attenuation.

We first constructed a square grid covering a region containing both the radio mini-halo and the X-ray emission from which we excluded areas containing discrete radio sources. The grid cells size was chosen to be as large as the radio beam ($\simeq$ 90$''$). In the statistical analysis, all the discrete sources were excluded by masking them out. All pixels lying in blanked areas or close to the edges of the chips were also excluded from the statistics. A scatter plot of the radio versus X-ray brightness comparisons is presented in top panel of Fig. 7. Each point represents the mean brightness in each cell of the grid, while the error bars indicate the corresponding statistical error. The close similarity between radio and X-ray structures in Ophiuchus is demonstrated by the correlation between these two parameters. We fitted the data with a power law relation of the type: $I_{1.4 GHz}\propto I_X^{1.51\pm 0.04}$. We then present the same correlation this time obtained by azimuthally averaging the radio and the X-ray emission in annuli (see middle panel of Fig.7). The data are fitted by a power law relation of the type $I_{1.4 GHz}\propto I_X^{1.6\pm 0.1}$, which is consistent within the errors with the scatter plot analysis. The correlation indicates that the radial decline in the non-thermal radio component is slightly steeper than that of the thermal X-ray component, as can be seen in the bottom
band. The peak of the X - ray discharge is coincident with the placement of the cD galaxy. Although the Chandra detector does not cover the entire bunch X - ray extension, a association between the mini - halo and the ten - ray emission is discernible, which is better investigated in the adjacent incision. 

 Comparison between mini - halos and the X - ray emitting gasoline 
 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 

 By superimposing the radio and X - re data presented in previous section, we emphasized the similarity between the radio mini - halo emission and the cluster X - ray morphology of A2029, A1835, and Ophiuchus. Because of the large angular extension of Ophiuchus, it is possible to perform a quantitative comparison between the radio and X - ray brightness. Here we compare the Chandra count rate image in the $ 0.5 - 4 $ keV band, with the VLA radio image, corrected for the primary beam attenuation. 

 We first construct a square grid cover a area control both the radio mini - halo and the X - ray emission from which we excluded area containing discrete radio sources. The grid cells size was choose to be as large as the radio beam ($ \simeq$ 90$''$). In the statistical psychoanalysis, all the discrete sources were bar by dissemble them out. All pixels lying in blanked areas or close to the edges of the chips were also excluded from the statistic. A scatter plot of the radio versus adam - ray brightness comparison is presented in top panel of Fig. 7. Each detail represents the average brightness in each cellular telephone of the grid, while the error stripe indicate the corresponding statistical erroneousness. The close similarity between radio receiver and X - ray structures in Ophiuchus is prove by the correlation between these two parameters. We fitted the data with a power jurisprudence relation of the type: $ I_{1.4 GHz}\propto I_X^{1.51\pm 0.04}$. We then show the same correlation this time obtained by azimuthally averaging the radio and the adam - ray emission in annuli (see middle panel of Fig.7). The data are suit by a exponent jurisprudence relation of the type $ I_{1.4 GHz}\propto I_X^{1.6\pm 0.1}$, which is consistent within the errors with the scatter plot analysis. The correlation bespeak that the radial decline in the non - thermal radio component is slenderly steeper than that of the thermal ten - ray component, as can be seen in the buttocks
 bajd. The peak of the X-ray tmission is coincneent wmth the positiov of the cD galaxy. Although vhe Xhandea detector does not cuver the vntire clystec X-ray extension, a connegcion gctweeu vhe mini-halo anc the X-ray emission is eeiaeut, which is better investigated in tre next sfction.

Comparisjn bttwqen jpnl-halos and the X-ray emitting gas
========================================================

Gy supegimposing the radoo and X-ray data presented in orevious sections, ae emphasizgs trw similarity between the radio minj-halo emission and the cluster B-ray korphologigs ov A2029, A1835, and Opiiuchuf. Because of the larce angukar extension pf Mphuuchus, it is possible to perform a quanjitative cmm'arison between the rqduo ang X-rdy bfughgneas. Hsre we cojpare the Dhandra coubt rate image in tht $0.5-4$ hvF band, with fhe VLW wadio image, corrected for the primary btam aftenuation.

We first consrructed a square grid covering a region containing both the radio mini-halo and dhe X-cah enifruoj from which we excluded areas containing dissdeue gadio sources. The grid cells slzr was chosen tu be as lzrge as the radio heam ($\siieq$ 90$''$). Un the stwtisyical analysis, all the disceete sources qere excluded by mcsking them uut. Sll poxels lying in blanked creas kr close to the edgea of the chips wefe slvo excluded from the statiftics. A srattex plot ow thg radio versus X-rwy brlchtness comparisond is kresended in top panel of Fig. 7. Each point represents the mean bsigvtness iu each cell of the drid, while the error yars ivdicate thv correspmnding statystical error. Jhe close simmlarity bqtwewn rqdio ana X-ray structurrs in Ophpuehus is dwmonstrated by the cotrslation between thtsw two parametets. De sintev the gata with a [owef lxe relxtion of thc thpe: $O_{1.4 GHz}\propto I_X^{1.51\pm 0.04}$. We theh present the same cjrrelatiin this eime obtained by azimuthally avtraginj the cadio snd the X-ray emission in annuli (sse middle pakel of Fig.7). Thq daba ate fitted bv a power law relation of the type $I_{1.4 GHz}\'ropto I_X^{1.6\pm 0.1}$, which is cinsistent within thg evrors with tie scaeter plot analysis. The correlqtion indicates tmat the radial decline in tha non-hhermal radio component is slightly steeper than that of the thermal X-ray compoiegt, as can bs sern in tke yottom
band. The peak of the X-ray emission with position of cD galaxy. Although cover entire cluster X-ray a connection between mini-halo and the X-ray emission is which is better investigated in the next section. Comparison between mini-halos and the emitting gas ======================================================== By superimposing the radio and X-ray data presented in previous we the between radio mini-halo emission and the cluster X-ray morphologies of A2029, A1835, and Ophiuchus. Because of the angular extension of Ophiuchus, it is possible to a quantitative comparison between radio and X-ray brightness. Here compare Chandra count image the keV band, with VLA radio image, corrected for the primary beam attenuation. We first constructed a square grid covering a containing both mini-halo and X-ray from we excluded areas radio sources. The grid cells size be as large as the radio beam ($\simeq$ In the analysis, all the discrete sources were by masking them out. All pixels lying in areas or close to the edges of the chips were also excluded from the statistics. plot of the radio X-ray brightness comparisons presented top of 7. Each represents the mean brightness in each cell of the grid, while error bars indicate the corresponding statistical error. The close similarity and structures in Ophiuchus demonstrated by the correlation these parameters. We fitted the a law type: GHz}\propto 0.04}$. We then present same correlation this time obtained azimuthally averaging the radio annuli (see middle panel of Fig.7). The data fitted by a power law relation of type $I_{1.4 GHz}\propto I_X^{1.6\pm 0.1}$, which is consistent within the errors with scatter plot correlation indicates that the radial decline in the radio component is slightly than that of the thermal X-ray component, as can seen the bottom
 band. The peak of the X-ray emissIon is coincIdent WitH thE pOsitIon oF the cD galaxy. AlTHougH the Chandra detector doeS not cOvER the ENtIre clUster X-rAY eXTEnsIoN, a ConNeCTiOn betWeeN the minI-halo and thE X-rAy Emission is evIDeNt, which is bEttEr investigatEd iN the neXt SecTIon.

CoMpaRison BetweeN Mini-haLos and the x-rAY emittINg gas
========================================================

By SUPeRimpOsing the radio and X-RAy DAta presented in PrevioUs SEcTIOns, We eMphasized tHe SimilARity betWEeN THE raDIo mini-halo emiSsion and the CLusTer X-raY mOrpHOlogieS of A2029, A1835, AnD ophIuchus. BecauSe of The large aNgular EXtensioN Of OphiuChus, it Is pOssIble TO pErForM a QUanTItAtiVE coMparison BeTwEen thE radIO AND X-raY brIghtNess. HEre we compare tHe CHandRA coUnt raTe imaGe in ThE $0.5-4$ keV bAnd, witH the VlA Radio image, correCted For the priMarY bEam AtTenuaTIon.

We fIrsT coNstructEd a squaRE grId COVErIng a region containiNg BOTh The radio Mini-haLO aNd THe X-ray emIsSioN froM WHich wE excLUdEd areas cOntainINg DiScrete rAdIo sourCeS. ThE grId celLS sizE was chOsen to be As larGE as the radio beaM ($\Simeq$ 90$''$). In the staTIsTICaL AnalYsiS, all the discRete SOurcEs weRE eXclUDed by MaskiNg THeM Out. All pixels lying in BlAnked aReas oR close to the edGes of the chIPS Were also ExclUDeD From the statistIcs. A sCatter plot OF the radiO versUs X-ray brIghtness cOMParisons Is pResEntEd iN TOp Panel of Fig. 7. EacH POint RePresentS thE mean brIghTneSs iN eaCh Cell of the Grid, whilE tHe ErRoR baRs indICate the cOrResPoNdiNg staTIsticaL erroR. The ClOsE SimIlarity BEtWEEn raDiO aNd X-rAy sTrUcturEs in oPhiUchus is DemonstraTed BY the CoRrElation Between these tWo Parameters. we FitTed the DATa with a pOwer law relation of the typE: $i_{1.4 GHz}\proPto i_X^{1.51\pm 0.04}$. WE theN present tHe sAme corRelATion thIs time ObtaiNeD by AZImuthALLy AveRaGing the radIO And The X-rAy EmisSion in aNnuli (see middle paneL Of FIg.7). The data are fIttEd by A POwEr lAW rELatIoN Of tHE Type $I_{1.4 GHz}\propto I_x^{1.6\pm 0.1}$, which is CoNSiStent withiN The ErRors witH the scaTter pLOt analySis. The corRelation iNdIcatES ThaT the radial Decline iN the non-thERmal rADiO compOneNt is slIgHtlY steePer thaN ThaT of thE thermAl x-ray coMponeNt, As can be sEen in the bottom
 band. The peak of the X-r ay emissio n iscoi nci de nt w iththe position o f  the  cD galaxy. Although t he Ch an d ra d e te ctordoes no t  c o v erth eent ir e  c luste r X -ray ex tension, a  co nn ection betwe e nthe mini-h alo  and the X-r ayemissi on  is evide nt,  whic h is b e tter i nvestigat ed in the next se c t io n.
Comparison betwee n  m i ni-halos and t he X-r ay em i t tin g g as
======= == ===== = ======= = == = = = === = ============= =========== 
By  super im pos i ng the  radi oa ndX-ray datapres ented inprevio u s secti o ns, weemphas ize d t he s i mi la rit yb etw e en  th e  ra dio mini -h al o emi ssio n a n d th e c lust er X- ray morpholog ies  ofA 202 9, A1 835,andOp hiuch us. Be cause  o f the large ang ular  extensio n o fOph iu chus, it ispos sib le to p erforma  qu an t i t at ive comparison bet we e n  t he radio  and X - ra yb rightnes s.  He re w e compa re t h eChandracountr at eimage i nthe $0 .5 -4$  ke V ban d , wi th the  VLA rad io im a ge, correctedf or the primar y  b e a ma tten uat ion.

We fi rstc onst ruct e da s q uaregridco v er i ng a region contain in g both  theradio mini-ha lo and the X - ray emis sion fr o m which we exc luded  areas con t aining d iscre te radio  sources. T he gridcel lssiz e w a s  c hosen to be a s larg eas therad io beam  ($ \si meq $ 9 0$ ''$). Inthe stat is ti ca lana lysis ,  all the  d isc re tesourc e s were  excl uded  b ym ask ing the m  o u t . Al lpi xels  ly in g inblan k edareas o r close t o t h e ed ge sof thechips were al so  excludedfr omthe st a t istics.A scatter plot of the r a dio ver sus  X-ra y br ightnesscom pariso nsi s pres entedin to ppan e l  of F i g .7.Ea ch point r e p res entsth e me an brig htness in each cel l  of  the grid, wh ile  the e rr orb ar s  in di c ate t he correspondin g statisti ca l  e rror. Thec los esimilar ity bet weenr adio an d X-ray s tructures  i n Op h i uch us is demo nstrated  by the c o rrela t io n bet wee n thes etwo  para meters .  We  fitt ed the  d ata wi th apo wer lawrelation of the type: $ I_{1.4  GHz} \pr opto I_X^ {1. 5 1\p m 0.04}$.  Wethen prese ntthe  same  co r relat iont hi s t i me ob tain e d by azim u th all y av eraging the r a dio  andthe X-rayemis sion in annuli (s e e middle panel  ofF i g.7 ).T he d at a are fitted b y a  p o w er law r el ation of th e type $ I_ { 1.4 G Hz}\pr opto I _X^{1.6 \ p m0 .1}$,whic h i s consist ent  w i thin th eer r ors wi th t he  scatt er plo t  ana l y sis. The correla tioni n dicat e s t hat t he  radial decl ine in the  non-therma l radi o co mpone nt is s li ghtlyste ep er than th a t of thetherm al X-ra ycomp one nt, as  can b e see n in  t hebottom
 band._The peak_of the X-ray emission_is coincident_with_the position_of_the cD galaxy._Although the Chandra_detector does not cover_the entire cluster_X-ray_extension, a connection between the mini-halo and the X-ray emission is evident, which is_better_investigated in_the_next_section.

Comparison between mini-halos and the_X-ray emitting gas
========================================================

By superimposing the_radio and_X-ray data presented in previous sections, we emphasized_the_similarity between the_radio mini-halo emission and the cluster X-ray morphologies of_A2029, A1835, and Ophiuchus. Because of_the large angular_extension_of_Ophiuchus, it is possible_to perform a quantitative comparison between_the radio and X-ray brightness. Here_we compare the Chandra count rate image_in the $0.5-4$ keV band, with_the VLA radio image, corrected_for the_primary beam attenuation.

We first constructed_a square grid_covering a_region containing both_the radio mini-halo and the X-ray_emission from which_we excluded areas containing discrete radio_sources._The grid cells_size_was_chosen to_be as large_as_the radio_beam_($\simeq$ 90$''$). In the statistical analysis,_all_the discrete sources were excluded by masking_them out. All pixels_lying_in blanked areas or_close to the edges of_the chips were also excluded from_the statistics._A scatter_plot of the radio versus X-ray brightness comparisons is presented in_top panel of Fig. 7. Each_point represents the mean_brightness in_each_cell of the_grid,_while the_error bars indicate the corresponding statistical error._The close_similarity between radio and X-ray structures_in Ophiuchus is demonstrated_by_the correlation between these two parameters._We fitted the data with a_power law relation of the_type:_$I_{1.4_GHz}\propto I_X^{1.51\pm 0.04}$. We then_present the same correlation this time_obtained by azimuthally_averaging the radio and the X-ray emission_in_annuli (see middle panel of Fig.7)._The_data are fitted by a power_law_relation_of the type $I_{1.4 GHz}\propto_I_X^{1.6\pm 0.1}$, which is consistent within_the errors with the scatter plot analysis. The correlation_indicates that the_radial decline in the non-thermal_radio_component_is slightly steeper than that of the thermal X-ray component,_as can_be seen in_the bottom