 of blue HB and RR Lyrae variable stars in And I is that they represent a (small) population of stars that formed perhaps 3 Gyr or more before the bulk of the stellar population in And I. Such a result implies that, just as is the case for many of the galactic dSphs, star formation in And I occurred over an extended interval. The driving mechanism(s) behind the extended and diverse star formation histories of the Local Group dSph systems remains one of the most outstanding unsolved problems in this branch of Astronomy.

Horizontal Branch Morphology Radial Gradients
---------------------------------------------

A further property of And I that is worthy of additional comment is that established in section 3.1.2: the existence of a radial gradient in the morphology of And I’s horizontal branch. The sense of the gradient is such that there are relatively more blue horizontal branch stars outside the core radius. This gradient could reflect either an underlying abundance gradient or a radial age gradient, but given the above discussion, it would seem more likely that it should be interpreted as suggesting that And I was more extended at its initial star forming epoch, than when the bulk of its stars formed.

In order to shed more light on this possibility, we have sought the existence of similar gradients in other dSph galaxies. This task requires dSph studies that fulfill the following criteria: a) the available photometry must extend beyond the core radius; b) the photometry must be reasonably precise at the magnitude of the horizontal branch; and c) the HB morphology must contain both blue and red stars. These criteria are satisfied by three studies: that of Carina by Smecker-Hane [*et al. *]{}(1994), of Leo II by Demers & Irwin (1993), and of Sculptor by Light (1988).

Considering first Carina, the extensive study of Smecker-Hane [*et al. *]{}(1994) clearly separates the “red clump” of intermediate-age core helium burning stars from the horizontal branch of old stars (both red and blue). Smecker-Hane [*et al. *]{}(1994) find no difference in the surface density distributions of these two classes of stars and further, they indicate that there is no systematic trend with radius in the fraction of the total core helium burning star population represented by the old HB stars. These results apply out to a radius of $\sim$10$\arcmin$ beyond which their sampling is incomplete. Using
of blue HB and RR Lyrae variable stars in And I is that they represent a (humble) population of star that formed perhaps 3 Gyr or more before the bulk of the leading population in And I. Such a result implies that, just as is the font for many of the galactic dSphs, star constitution in And I occurred over an extended time interval. The driving mechanism(s) behind the extended and diverse star constitution histories of the Local Group dSph systems remains one of the most outstanding unsolved problem in this branch of Astronomy. 

 Horizontal Branch Morphology Radial Gradients 
 --------------------------------------------- 

 A further property of And I that is worthy of extra comment is that established in part 3.1.2: the existence of a radial gradient in the morphology of And I ’s horizontal outgrowth. The sense of the gradient is such that there are relatively more blue horizontal branch stars outside the effect radius. This gradient could reflect either an underlying abundance gradient or a radial age gradient, but given the above discussion, it would seem more likely that it should be interpreted as suggesting that And I was more extended at its initial star forming epoch, than when the bulk of its stars formed. 

 In order to shed more luminosity on this possibility, we have sought the universe of exchangeable gradients in other dSph galaxies. This undertaking requires dSph studies that fulfill the following criteria: a) the available photometry must prolong beyond the core radius; b) the photometry must be reasonably precise at the magnitude of the horizontal branch; and c) the HB morphology must hold both blue and red stars. These criteria are quenched by three studies: that of Carina by Smecker - Hane [ * et al.   * ] { } (1994), of Leo II by Demers & Irwin (1993), and of Sculptor by Light (1988). 

 consider inaugural Carina, the extensive study of Smecker - Hane [ * et al.   * ] { } (1994) clearly separate the “ red clump ” of intermediate - old age core helium burning stars from the horizontal branch of honest-to-god stars (both red and gloomy). Smecker - Hane [ * et al.   * ] { } (1994) find no deviation in the surface concentration distributions of these two classes of star and further, they indicate that there be no systematic vogue with radius in the fraction of the total core helium burning star population represented by the old HB stars. These results use out to a radius of $ \sim$10$\arcmin$ beyond which their sampling is incomplete. use
 of blue HB and RR Lyrae vaviable stars in Cbd I iv that they reoresent a (small) population oh stqrs tyat formed perhaps 3 Gyf or more before rhe uulk of the stellar population ln Anb M. Such a result implies tvat, just as is tfe case for many of the galactic dSphf, star gogmation in And I obctrres over an extended interval. The drjving mtchanism(s) behind tne extended and diverse stwr flrmation histories of the Locql Gwiup dSph sysgems remains one of thg most outstanding unsolved probuems nn this brabcy ov Astronomy.

Hirizogtal Branch Morpholocy Radisl Gradients
---------------------------------------------

A nurthxr peoperty of And I that is worthy of addijional comkeut is that establishee un sewtiot 3.1.2: tfw ebisuenre kf a rwdiel gradient in the morphology of And I’s hprydpntal branch. The sqnfe of the gradient is such that there age rslatively more blue horuzontal branch stars lutside tre core radius. This gradient could reflect either an uiddrlvlkg acynfance gradient or a radial age gradient, but gybem nhe above discusslon, it would seem koge jikely that ij shoulb bs interpreted as skggestigg thqt And I ras kore extended at its initiao star formiug wpoch, than when thz bulk of itr stsrs fprmed.

In order to shed mure might on thls possibjuity, we have soueht tve existtvce of similar grwdients ii othzr dSph ealacies. Tris task rfquircv dSph studies thah fulyill dhe followlng criteria: a) the available photometry must gxtand beyond che cove radius; b) the photometry muxt be rzasonacly precisv at the kagnitude os the horizondwl branch; anv c) the HF moephooogy murg contain both blue and red stars. These criteria arc satkafied by three wtueies: that of Catinx br Dmxcker-Rdne [*et al. *]{}(1994), of Leo II ny Deoers & Irwin (1993), and of Sculptor by Lighd (1988).

Cohsidering first Catika, the exjensive seudy of Smeckrr-Hane [*et al. *]{}(1994) clearpy se'arater the “req clump” of intermediate-age cors helium hurking stars frjm tme hjrizontal yranch of old stars (both red and blue). Smxcker-Hane [*et al. *]{}(1994) find no difference in the xmrface densivy diseributionv of these two classws of stars and fmrther, they indicate tgat thare id no systematic trend with radius in the fraction of the total core heliun burnmnd star popumatipn reirefznted br thx uld HB stars. Thexe results apply out to a radiur of $\sim$10$\dremin$ beyond which their samplone is incompleje. Using
of blue HB and RR Lyrae variable And is that represent a (small) perhaps Gyr or more the bulk of stellar population in And I. Such result implies that, just as is the case for many of the galactic star formation in And I occurred over an extended interval. The driving mechanism(s) the and star histories of the Local Group dSph systems remains one of the most outstanding unsolved problems in branch of Astronomy. Horizontal Branch Morphology Radial Gradients A further property of I that is worthy of comment that established section the of a radial in the morphology of And I’s horizontal branch. The sense of the gradient is such that there relatively more branch stars the radius. gradient could reflect underlying abundance gradient or a radial given the above discussion, it would seem more that it be interpreted as suggesting that And was more extended at its initial star forming than when the bulk of its stars formed. In order to shed more light on we have sought the of similar gradients other galaxies. task dSph studies fulfill the following criteria: a) the available photometry must extend beyond core radius; b) the photometry must be reasonably precise at of horizontal branch; and the HB morphology must both and red stars. These satisfied three Carina Smecker-Hane al. *]{}(1994), of Leo by Demers & Irwin (1993), of Sculptor by Light extensive study of Smecker-Hane [*et al. *]{}(1994) clearly the “red clump” of intermediate-age core helium stars from the horizontal branch of old stars (both red and blue). [*et al. no difference in the surface density distributions of two classes of stars further, they indicate that there is no systematic trend radius the fraction the total core burning star population by the old These results out a beyond which their sampling is incomplete.
 of blue HB and RR Lyrae variablE stars in AnD I is tHat TheY rEpreSent A (small) populatiON of sTars that formed perhaps 3 GYr or mOrE BefoRE tHe bulK of the sTElLAR poPuLaTioN iN anD I. SucH a rEsult imPlies that, jUst As Is the case for MAnY of the galaCtiC dSphs, star foRmaTion in anD I oCCurreD ovEr an eXtendeD IntervAl. The drivInG MechanISm(s) behiND ThE extEnded and diverse stAR fORmation historiEs of thE LOCaL gRouP dSPh systems rEmAins oNE of the mOSt OUTStaNDing unsolved pRoblems in thIS brAnch of asTroNOmy.

HorIzontAl bRanCh MorphologY RadIal GradieNts
---------------------------------------------

A fuRTher proPErty of ANd I thaT is WorThy oF AdDiTioNaL ComMEnT is THat EstablisHeD iN sectIon 3.1.2: tHE EXIsteNce Of a rAdial Gradient in the MorPholOGy oF And I’S horiZontAl BrancH. The seNse of ThE gradient is such That There are rElaTiVelY mOre blUE horizOntAl bRanch stArs outsIDe tHe CORE rAdius. This gradient cOuLD ReFlect eitHer an uNDeRlYIng abundAnCe gRadiENT or a rAdiaL AgE gradienT, but giVEn ThE above dIsCussioN, iT woUld Seem mORe liKely thAt it shouLd be iNTerpreted as sugGEsting that And i WaS MOrE ExteNdeD at its initiAl stAR forMing EPoCh, tHAn wheN the bUlK Of ITs stars formed.

In ordeR tO shed mOre liGht on this possIbility, we hAVE Sought thE exiSTeNCe of similar graDientS in other dSPH galaxieS. This Task requIres dSph sTUDies that FulFilL thE foLLOwIng criteria: a) tHE AvaiLaBle photOmeTry must ExtEnd BeyOnd ThE core radiUs; b) the phOtOmEtRy MusT be reASonably pReCisE aT thE magnITude of The hoRizoNtAl BRanCh; and c) tHE Hb MOrphOlOgY musT coNtAin boTh blUE anD red staRs. These crIteRIa arE sAtIsfied bY three studies: ThAt of Carina By smeCker-HaNE [*Et al. *]{}(1994), of LeO II by Demers & Irwin (1993), and of ScULptor by ligHt (1988).

ConSideRing first carIna, the ExtENsive sTudy of smeckEr-hanE [*ET al. *]{}(1994) clEARlY sePaRates the “reD CLumP” of inTeRmedIate-age Core helium burning sTArs From the horizoNtaL braNCH oF olD StARs (bOtH Red AND blue). Smecker-HanE [*et al. *]{}(1994) find nO dIFfErence in thE SurFaCe densiTy distrIbutiONs of theSe two clasSes of starS aNd fuRTHer, They indicaTe that thEre is no sySTematIC tRend wIth Radius In The FractIon of tHE toTal coRe heliUm BurninG star PoPulation Represented by the old HB stArs. TheSe resUltS apply out To a RAdiUs of $\sim$10$\arCmin$ Beyond whicH thEir SamplIng IS incoMpleTE. USinG
 of blue HB and RR Lyrae v ariable st ars i n A ndIis t hatthey represent a (s mall) population of st ars t ha t  for m ed  perh aps 3 G y ro r  mo re  b efo re th e bul k o f the s tellar pop ula ti on in And I. Su ch a resul t i mplies that,  ju st asis  th e  case  fo r man y of t h e gala ctic dSph s, star f o rmation i nAndI occurred over a n  e x tended interva l. The  d r iv i n g m ech anism(s) b eh ind t h e exten d ed a n d d i verse star fo rmation his t ori es ofth e L o cal Gr oup d Sp h  sy stems remai ns o ne of the  mosto utstand i ng unso lved p rob lem s in th is  br an c h o f  A str o nom y.

Hori zo nt al Br anch M o r phol ogy  Rad ial G radients
---- --- ---- - --- ----- ----- ---- -- ----- ------ ---
Afurther propert y of  And I th atis  wo rt hy of additi ona l c ommentis that est ab l i s he d in section 3.1.2 :t h eexistenc e of a ra di a l gradie nt  in  the m orpho logy of  And I’s  horiz o nt al  branch .The se ns e o f t he gr a dien t is s uch that  ther e  are relativel y  more blue ho r iz o n ta l  bra nch  stars outs idet he c orer ad ius .  This  grad ie n tc ould reflect either  a n unde rlyin g abundance g radient or a radial a ge g r ad i ent, but given  theabove disc u ssion, i t wou ld seemmore like l y  that it  sh oul d b e i n t er preted as sug g e stin gthat An d I  was mo reext end edat  its init ial star  f or mi ng  ep och,t han when  t hebu lkof it s  stars  form ed.
I no rde r to sh e dm o re l ig ht  onthi spossi bili t y,we have  sought t hee xist en ce  of sim ilar gradient sin other d Sp h g alaxie s .  This ta sk requires dSph studie s  that f ulf ill t he f ollowingcri teria:  a) the av ailabl e pho to met r y  must e xt end  b eyond thec o reradiu s;  b)the pho tometry must be re a son ably preciseatthem a gn itu d eo f t he hor i z ontal branch; a nd c) theHB mo rphology m u stco ntain b oth blu e and red sta rs. These  criteria  a re s a t isf ied by thr ee studi es: thato f Car i na  by S mec ker-Ha ne  [* et al . *]{} ( 199 4), o f LeoII  by De mers&Irwin (1 993), and of Sculptor b y Ligh t (19 88) .

Consid eri n g f irst Cari na,the extens ive  st udy o f S m ecker -Han e  [ *et al. * ]{}( 1 994) clea r ly  se p a ra tes the “re d c lum p” of  in t ermedi ate- age core helium b u rning stars fr om t h e  ho riz o ntal  b ranch of old s tar s( b oth redan d blue). Sm ecker-Ha ne [*etal. *] {}(199 4) find n od iffere nceinthe surfa cede n sity di st ri b utions  ofth ese tw o clas s es o f stars and furthe r, th e y  indi c ate  that  t here is no s ystematictrend withradius  inthe f raction  o f thetot al  core heli u m burning  star  popula ti on r epr esente d by t he ol d HB  s tar s. Theser e su l ts  a p ply  out  to a  r adiu s of $\si m $10$\arc min $  beyond  w hic h theirs am p l ing is inc omp lete. U sing
 of_blue HB_and RR Lyrae variable_stars in_And_I is_that_they represent a_(small) population of_stars that formed perhaps_3 Gyr or_more_before the bulk of the stellar population in And I. Such a result implies_that,_just as_is_the_case for many of the_galactic dSphs, star formation in_And I_occurred over an extended interval. The driving mechanism(s)_behind_the extended and_diverse star formation histories of the Local Group dSph_systems remains one of the most_outstanding unsolved problems_in_this_branch of Astronomy.

Horizontal Branch_Morphology Radial Gradients
---------------------------------------------

A further property of_And I that is worthy of_additional comment is that established in section_3.1.2: the existence of a radial_gradient in the morphology of_And I’s_horizontal branch. The sense of_the gradient is_such that_there are relatively_more blue horizontal branch stars outside_the core radius._This gradient could reflect either an_underlying_abundance gradient or_a_radial_age gradient,_but given the_above_discussion, it_would_seem more likely that it should_be_interpreted as suggesting that And I was_more extended at its_initial_star forming epoch, than_when the bulk of its_stars formed.

In order to shed more_light on_this possibility,_we have sought the existence of similar gradients in other dSph_galaxies. This task requires dSph studies_that fulfill the following_criteria: a)_the_available photometry must_extend_beyond the_core radius; b) the photometry must be_reasonably precise_at the magnitude of the horizontal_branch; and c) the_HB_morphology must contain both blue and_red stars. These criteria are satisfied_by three studies: that of_Carina_by_Smecker-Hane [*et al. *]{}(1994), of Leo_II by Demers & Irwin (1993),_and of Sculptor_by Light (1988).

Considering first Carina, the extensive_study_of Smecker-Hane [*et al. *]{}(1994) clearly separates_the_“red clump” of intermediate-age core helium_burning_stars_from the horizontal branch of_old stars (both red and blue)._Smecker-Hane [*et al. *]{}(1994) find no difference in the surface_density distributions of_these two classes of stars_and_further,_they indicate that there is no systematic trend with radius_in the_fraction of the_total core helium burning star population represented by the old_HB stars. These results apply out to_a radius of $\sim$10$\arcmin$ beyond which their sampling is incomplete. Using