 (x + y)) 
\big( Q_j(\sigma, \sigma) - Q_j(\sigma, \tau) \big)} ~. \end{aligned}$$ It is easy to check that when $\mu = M$, $A_j(s/M^2, \eta)$ coincides with the amplitude $\tilde{A}_j(s, M^2)$ obtained in Ref. [@egt].

Eqs. (\[aleptf\], \[solutionaj\]) describe all invariant amplitudes for $e^+e^-$ -annihilation into a quark or a lepton pair in the collinear kinematics (\[tmu\], \[umu\]).

Scattering amplitudes at large values of $t$ and $u$  {#FB}
=====================================================

In this section we calculate the scattering amplitudes $A$ when the restriction of Eqs. (\[tmu\], \[umu\]) for the kinematical configurations (\[tkin\], \[ukin\]) are replaced by $$\label{tm}
s \gg M^2 \geq -t \gg \mu^2$$ and $$\label{um}
s \gg M^2 \geq -u \gg \mu^2 ~.$$

In this kinematical regions it is more convenient to study the scattering amplitudes $A$ directly, rather than using the invariant amplitudes $A_j$. In order to unify the discussion for both kinematics (\[tm\], \[um\]), let us introduce $$\label{kappat}
\kappa = -t ~,$$ when (\[tm\]) is considered and $$\label{kappau}
\kappa = -u$$ for the other case (\[um\]). Using this notation, the same parameterization $A = A(s, \mu^2, M^2, \kappa)$ holds for both kinematics (\[tm\], \[um\]). Let us discuss now the evolution equations for $A$. As in the previous case, it is convenient to consider separately the purely QED part, $A^{(QED)}$ and the mixed part, $A'$: $$\label{separ}
A(s, \kappa, \mu^2, M^2) = A^{(QED)}(s, \kappa, \mu^2) 
+ A'(s, \kappa, \mu^2, M^2 ).$$

Generalizing Eq. (\[param\]), we can parameterize them as follows: $$A^{(QED
(x + y) ) 
 \big (Q_j(\sigma, \sigma) - Q_j(\sigma, \tau) \big) } ~. \end{aligned}$$ It is easy to check that when $ \mu = M$, $ A_j(s / M^2, \eta)$ coincides with the amplitude $ \tilde{A}_j(s, M^2)$ obtained in Ref.   [ @egt ]. 

 Eqs.   (\[aleptf\ ], \[solutionaj\ ]) identify all changeless amplitudes for $ e^+e^-$ -annihilation into a quark or a lepton couple in the collinear kinematics   (\[tmu\ ], \[umu\ ]). 

 Scattering amplitude at large value of $ t$ and $ u$   { # FB } 
 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 

 In this section we calculate the disperse amplitudes $ A$ when the restriction of Eqs.   (\[tmu\ ], \[umu\ ]) for the kinematical shape (\[tkin\ ], \[ukin\ ]) are replaced by $ $ \label{tm } 
 s \gg M^2 \geq -t \gg \mu^2$$ and $ $ \label{um } 
 s \gg M^2 \geq -u \gg \mu^2 ~.$$ 

 In this kinematical regions it is more commodious to study the scattering amplitudes $ A$ directly, rather than using the invariant amplitude $ A_j$. In order to unify the discussion for both kinematics   (\[tm\ ], \[um\ ]), let us precede $ $ \label{kappat } 
 \kappa = -t ~,$$ when (\[tm\ ]) is considered and $ $ \label{kappau } 
 \kappa = -u$$ for the other case (\[um\ ]). Using this note, the same parameterization $ A = A(s, \mu^2, M^2, \kappa)$ have for both kinematics   (\[tm\ ], \[um\ ]). Let us discuss now the development equations for $ A$. As in the previous case, it is convenient to consider separately the strictly QED region, $ A^{(QED)}$ and the mixed part, $ A'$: $ $ \label{separ } 
 A(s, \kappa, \mu^2, M^2) = A^{(QED)}(s, \kappa, \mu^2) 
 + A'(s, \kappa, \mu^2, M^2) .$$ 

 Generalizing Eq.   (\[param\ ]), we can parameterize them as follows: $ $ A^{(QED
 (x + y)) 
\big( Q_j(\sigma, \sigma) - Q_j(\rigma, \tau) \big)} ~. \gne{alignxd}$$ It ia easy tu check that when $\mu = M$, $A_j(s/M^2, \era)$ councides with the ampligude $\tildv{A}_j(s, M^2)$ obraintd in Ref. [@egt].

Eqs. (\[alxltf\], \[solmcionan\]) desermbe all invariakt amplitudas for $e^+e^-$ -anniviuacion into a quark or a lepton pair ig the cplpinear kinematycs (\[tkt\], \[umh\]).

Scattering amplitudes at large vamues of $t$ and $u$  {#FB}
=====================================================

Im this section we calculatf thf scattering amplihudes $A$ wheb thq restriction of Eqs. (\[tmu\], \[umu\]) for the kinematical configurations (\[tkiv\], \[ukiu\]) are replaxee bj $$\label{tm}
s \gj M^2 \gez -t \gg \mu^2$$ and $$\label{uk}
s \gg M^2 \geq -u \gg \mu^2 ~.$$

Ik thiv kunematical regions it is more convenienj to study tke scattering amplitueew $A$ dhrecdly, fqthdr uhai uaing tje mnvariant ajplitudes $A_h$. In order to unify trv discussion ror boeh kinematics (\[tm\], \[um\]), let us introduce $$\label{naplat}
\kappa = -t ~,$$ when (\[tm\]) is considered and $$\label{nappau}
\kap[a = -u$$ for the other case (\[um\]). Using this notation, tve sajd pcvwowtfrization $A = A(s, \mu^2, M^2, \kappa)$ holds for both kinqjauicx (\[tm\], \[um\]). Let us biscuss now the rvllijion equations for $A$. As in the previous cwse, it ys cobvenient uo comsider separately the purelt QED part, $A^{(ZWD)}$ and the mixed pcrt, $A'$: $$\label{szpar}
A(s, \kapps, \mu^2, M^2) = A^{(QED)}(s, \kappa, \mu^2) 
+ A'(s, \iappa, \mu^2, M^2 ).$$

Heneralizjvg Eq. (\[param\]), we cav psrdmeterizt them as follows: $$W^{(QED
(x + y)) \big( Q_j(\sigma, \sigma) - \big)} \end{aligned}$$ It easy to check $A_j(s/M^2, coincides with the $\tilde{A}_j(s, M^2)$ obtained Ref. [@egt]. Eqs. (\[aleptf\], \[solutionaj\]) describe invariant amplitudes for $e^+e^-$ -annihilation into a quark or a lepton pair in collinear kinematics (\[tmu\], \[umu\]). Scattering amplitudes at large values of $t$ and $u$ ===================================================== this we the scattering amplitudes $A$ when the restriction of Eqs. (\[tmu\], \[umu\]) for the kinematical configurations (\[tkin\], are replaced by $$\label{tm} s \gg M^2 \geq \gg \mu^2$$ and $$\label{um} \gg M^2 \geq -u \gg ~.$$ this kinematical it more to study the amplitudes $A$ directly, rather than using the invariant amplitudes $A_j$. In order to unify the discussion for kinematics (\[tm\], us introduce \kappa -t when (\[tm\]) is $$\label{kappau} \kappa = -u$$ for the Using this notation, the same parameterization $A = \mu^2, M^2, holds for both kinematics (\[tm\], \[um\]). us discuss now the evolution equations for $A$. in the previous case, it is convenient to consider separately the purely QED part, $A^{(QED)}$ mixed part, $A'$: $$\label{separ} \kappa, \mu^2, M^2) A^{(QED)}(s, \mu^2) A'(s, \mu^2, M^2 Generalizing Eq. (\[param\]), we can parameterize them as follows: $$A^{(QED
 (x + y)) 
\big( Q_j(\sigma, \sigma) - Q_j(\sigma, \tAu) \big)} ~. \end{alIgned}$$ it iS eaSy To chEck tHat when $\mu = M$, $A_j(s/M^2, \ETa)$ coIncides with the amplitudE $\tildE{A}_J(S, M^2)$ obTAiNed in ref. [@egt].

EQS. (\[aLEPtf\], \[SoLuTioNaJ\]) DeScribE alL invariAnt amplituDes FoR $e^+e^-$ -annihilatIOn Into a quark Or a Lepton pair in The CollinEaR kiNEmatiCs (\[tMu\], \[umu\]).

scatteRIng ampLitudes at LaRGe valuES of $t$ and $U$  {#fb}
=====================================================

IN thiS section we calculaTE tHE scattering ampLitudeS $A$ WHeN THe rEstRiction of EQs. (\[Tmu\], \[umU\]) For the kINeMATIcaL ConfigurationS (\[tkin\], \[ukin\]) arE RepLaced bY $$\lAbeL{Tm}
s \gg M^2 \Geq -t \gG \mU^2$$ And $$\Label{um}
s \gg M^2 \Geq -u \Gg \mu^2 ~.$$

In thiS kinemATical reGIons it iS more cOnvEniEnt tO StUdY thE sCAttERiNg aMPliTudes $A$ diReCtLy, ratHer tHAN USing The InvaRiant Amplitudes $A_j$. IN orDer tO UniFy the DiscuSsioN fOr botH kinemAtics (\[Tm\], \[Um\]), let us introducE $$\labEl{kappat}
\kAppA = -t ~,$$ WheN (\[tM\]) is coNSidereD anD $$\laBel{kappAu}
\kappa = -U$$ For ThE OTHeR case (\[um\]). Using this noTaTIOn, The same pArametERiZaTIon $A = A(s, \mu^2, m^2, \kAppA)$ holDS For boTh kiNEmAtics (\[tm\], \[uM\]). Let us DIsCuSs now thE eVolutiOn EquAtiOns foR $a$. As iN the prEvious caSe, it iS Convenient to coNSider separateLY tHE PuREly QeD pArt, $A^{(QED)}$ and tHe miXEd paRt, $A'$: $$\lABeL{sePAr}
A(s, \kAppa, \mU^2, M^2) = a^{(qEd)}(S, \kappa, \mu^2) 
+ A'(s, \kappa, \mu^2, M^2 ).$$

GEnEralizIng Eq. (\[Param\]), we can parAmeterize tHEM As followS: $$A^{(QEd
 (x + y)) 
\big( Q_j(\sigm a, \sigma)  - Q_ j(\ sig ma , \t au)\big)} ~. \end { alig ned}$$ It is easy to c heckth a t wh e n$\mu= M$, $ A _j ( s /M^ 2,  \ eta )$ co incid eswith th e amplitud e $ \t ilde{A}_j(s, M^ 2)$ obtain edin Ref. [@eg t]. 

Eqs.  ( \[a l eptf\ ],\[sol utiona j \]) de scribe al li nvaria n t ampli t u de s fo r $e^+e^-$ -annih i la t ion into a qua rk oral ep t o n p air  in the co ll inear kinemat i cs ( \ [tm u \], \[umu\]). 

Scatterin g  am plitud es  at largevalue so f $ t$ and $u$ {#F B}
====== ====== = ======= = ======= ====== === === ==== = == == === =Int hi s s e cti on we ca lc ul ate t he s c a t t erin g a mpli tudes  $A$ when the  re stri c tio n ofEqs.(\[t mu \], \ [umu\] ) for  t he kinematicalconf iguration s ( \[ tki n\ ], \[ u kin\])  ar e r eplaced  by $$\ l abe l{ t m } 
s  \gg M^2 \geq -t \ gg \ mu ^2$$ and  $$\la b el {u m }
s \ggM^ 2 \ geq- u  \gg\mu^ 2  ~ .$$

Inthis k i ne ma tical r eg ions i tismor e con v enie nt tostudy th e sca t tering amplitu d es $A$ direct l y, r at h er t han  using theinva r iant  amp l it ude s  $A_j $. In  o r de r  to unify the discu ss ion fo r bot h kinematics(\[tm\], \ [ u m \]), let  usi nt r oduce $$\label {kapp at}
\kappa = -t ~,$ $ whe n (\[tm\ ]) is con s i dered an d $ $\l abe l{k a p pa u}
\kappa = - u $ $ fo rthe oth ercase (\ [um \]) . U sin gthis nota tion, th esa me  p ara meter i zation $ A= A (s , \ mu^2, M^2, \ kappa )$ h ol ds for  both k i ne m a tics  ( \[ tm\] , \ [u m\]).  Let usdiscuss  now theevo l utio neq uations  for $A$. Asin  the previ ou s c ase, i t is conve nient to consider separ a tely th e p urely  QED  part, $A ^{( QED)}$  an d  the m ixed p art,$A '$: $ $\lab e l {s epa r} 
A(s, \kap p a , \ mu^2,  M ^2)= A^{(Q ED)}(s, \kappa, \m u ^2)  
+ A'(s, \ka ppa , \m u ^ 2,  M^ 2  ) . $$
G e ner a l izing Eq. (\[pa ram\]), we  c a nparameteri z e t he m as fo llows:$$A^{ ( QED
 (x_+ y))_
\big( Q_j(\sigma, \sigma) -_Q_j(\sigma, \tau)_\big)}_~. \end{aligned}$$_It_is easy to_check that when_$\mu = M$, $A_j(s/M^2,_\eta)$ coincides with_the_amplitude $\tilde{A}_j(s, M^2)$ obtained in Ref. [@egt].

Eqs. (\[aleptf\], \[solutionaj\]) describe all invariant amplitudes for $e^+e^-$ -annihilation_into_a quark_or_a_lepton pair in the collinear_kinematics (\[tmu\], \[umu\]).

Scattering amplitudes at large_values of_$t$ and $u$  {#FB}
=====================================================

In this section we_calculate_the scattering amplitudes_$A$ when the restriction of Eqs. (\[tmu\], \[umu\]) for the_kinematical configurations (\[tkin\], \[ukin\]) are replaced_by $$\label{tm}
s \gg_M^2_\geq_-t \gg \mu^2$$ and_$$\label{um}
s \gg M^2 \geq -u \gg_\mu^2 ~.$$

In this kinematical regions it_is more convenient to study the scattering_amplitudes $A$ directly, rather than using_the invariant amplitudes $A_j$. In_order to_unify the discussion for both_kinematics (\[tm\], \[um\]), let_us introduce_$$\label{kappat}
\kappa = -t_~,$$ when (\[tm\]) is considered and_$$\label{kappau}
\kappa = -u$$_for the other case (\[um\]). Using_this_notation, the same_parameterization_$A_= A(s,_\mu^2, M^2, \kappa)$_holds_for both_kinematics (\[tm\],_\[um\]). Let us discuss now the_evolution_equations for $A$. As in the previous_case, it is convenient_to_consider separately the purely_QED part, $A^{(QED)}$ and the_mixed part, $A'$: $$\label{separ}
A(s, \kappa, \mu^2,_M^2) =_A^{(QED)}(s, \kappa,_\mu^2) 
+ A'(s, \kappa, \mu^2, M^2 ).$$

Generalizing Eq. (\[param\]), we can parameterize_them as follows: $$A^{(QED