 universality classes! This high degree of coincidence leads to the important conjecture that the universal content of the partial differential equations and is equivalent [^1].\

  ---------------- --------------------------------- ------------------------------------
   $\quad N\quad$  $\quad {\rm Polchinski}\quad$      $\quad\quad R_{\rm opt}\quad\quad$
    \[.5ex\] $0$   ${}\quad$ ${}\quad$ —                   $\ 0.65788^{a}\ \ \ {}$
        $1$        ${}\quad$ $\ 0.65574^{c,e}\ {}$           $\ 0.655746^{a}\ {}$
        $2$        ${}\quad$ $\ 0.6712^{d}\ {}$              $\ 0.671221^{a}\ {}$
        $3$        ${}\quad$ $\ 0.6998^{d}\ {}$              $\ 0.699837^{a}\ {}$
        $4$        ${}\quad$ $\ 0.7338^{d}\ {}$              $\ 0.733753^{a}\ {}$
  ---------------- --------------------------------- ------------------------------------

  : Subleading correction-to-scaling exponent $\omega$.

[**5. Stability**]{}\
Next, we analyse the locality and stability structure of flows and show that the non-universal properties of RG flows in the vicinity of a scaling solution are vastly different. Consider the fixed point solution itself, which is non-universal and not measurable in any experiment. Using, the nontrivial scaling solution with $u'_\star \neq$ const. and $\partial_t
u'_\star=0$ of the Polchinski RG obeys the differential equation \[FlowPRGupScal\] 2 u\_’ - (d-2)u\_” =2(u\_’)\^2 - 02N u\_”’ -(1+02N-4u\_’)u\_”. For large fields, the scaling potential behaves as \[solutionPRGExpansionLarge\] u\_() +[subleading]{}. An analytical solution for $N=\infty$ has been given in [@Kubyshin:2001gz]. On the level of the RG flow, this behaviour stems from a cancellation between the canonical scaling of the potential and its non-linear renormalisation. From, we conclude that the non-trivial quantum contributions to the Polchinski flow diverges like \[PRG-largefield\] \_t
universality classes! This high degree of coincidence lead to the authoritative conjecture that the universal content of the fond differential equations and is equivalent [ ^1].\ 

   ---------------- --------------------------------- ------------------------------------ 
    $ \quad N\quad$   $ \quad { \rm Polchinski}\quad$       $ \quad\quad R_{\rm opt}\quad\quad$ 
     \[.5ex\ ] $ 0 $    $ { } \quad$ $ { } \quad$ —                    $ \ 0.65788^{a}\ \ \ { } $ 
         $ 1 $         $ { } \quad$ $ \ 0.65574^{c, e}\ { } $            $ \ 0.655746^{a}\ { } $ 
         $ 2 $         $ { } \quad$ $ \ 0.6712^{d}\ { } $               $ \ 0.671221^{a}\ { } $ 
         $ 3 $         $ { } \quad$ $ \ 0.6998^{d}\ { } $               $ \ 0.699837^{a}\ { } $ 
         $ 4 $         $ { } \quad$ $ \ 0.7338^{d}\ { } $               $ \ 0.733753^{a}\ { } $ 
   ---------------- --------------------------------- ------------------------------------ 

  : Subleading correction - to - scaling advocate $ \omega$. 

 [ * * 5. Stability**]{}\ 
 Next, we analyze the locality and constancy social organization of flows and show that the non - cosmopolitan properties of RG flows in the vicinity of a scaling solution are vastly unlike. Consider the fixed point solution itself, which is non - universal and not measurable in any experiment. Using, the nontrivial scaling solution with $ u'_\star \neq$ const.   and $ \partial_t 
 u'_\star=0 $ of the Polchinski RG obeys the differential equation \[FlowPRGupScal\ ] 2 u\ _ ’ - (d-2)u\ _ ” = 2(u\_’)\^2 - 02N u\ _ ” ’ -(1 + 02N-4u\_’)u\ _ ”. For bombastic fields, the scaling potential behaves as \[solutionPRGExpansionLarge\ ] u\ _ () + [ subleading ] { }. An analytic solution for $ N=\infty$ has been given in [ @Kubyshin:2001gz ]. On the level of the RG flow, this behaviour stem from a cancellation between the canonical scaling of the potential and its non - linear renormalisation. From, we conclude that the non - trivial quantum contribution to the Polchinski flow diverges like \[PRG - largefield\ ] \_t
 unlversality classes! This migh degree of coincideice leass to thd important conjecture that vhe yniveesal content of the paftial difverentiao eqnations and is equivalenb [^1].\

  ---------------- --------------------------------- ------------------------------------
   $\qbav N\quad$  $\quad {\rk Polchinsni}\quad$      $\qudd\ducd R_{\rm opt}\quad\quad$
    \[.5ex\] $0$   ${}\quad$ ${}\quaq$ —                   $\ 0.65788^{a}\ \ \ {}$
        $1$        ${}\quad$ $\ 0.65574^{c,e}\ {}$           $\ 0.655746^{a}\ {}$
        $2$        ${}\quad$ $\ 0.6712^{d}\ {}$              $\ 0.671221^{a}\ {}$
        $3$        ${}\quad$ $\ 0.6998^{d}\ {}$              $\ 0.699837^{q}\ {}$
        $4$        ${}\quad$ $\ 0.7338^{d}\ {}$              $\ 0.733753^{a}\ {}$
  ---------------- --------------------------------- ------------------------------------

  : Subleading correctiov-to-sccling expongur $\olgga$.

[**5. Stabilitb**]{}\
Next, re analyse tmv localhty and stability strmcturx of flows and show that vhe non-universal prokerties of RY flows in the viciniry of a scaning woljtikn ade vashly different. Consider tye fixed point soluuiog itself, which is nog-ugiversal and not measurable in any expegimeht. Using, the nontrivial scaling solution witj $u'_\star \nqq$ const. and $\partial_t
u'_\star=0$ of the Polchinski RG obays tie diyncrenguap equation \[FlowPRGupScal\] 2 u\_’ - (d-2)u\_” =2(u\_’)\^2 - 02N u\_”’ -(1+02N-4u\_’)u\_”. Fow lsrne fields, the sccling potential nejafgs as \[solutionKRGExpauaiknLarge\] u\_() +[subleadijg]{}. An agalytucal soluuion gor $N=\infty$ has been given ib [@Kubyshin:2001gz]. In the level of thz RG flow, thns behsviout stems from a cancellacion bstween the fanonical rcaling of the putektidl and iur non-linear renorialisatioi. Frok, we covcluce thae the non-tgivial quantum contributlons jo the Polchinskl flow diverges like \[PRG-largefixkd\] \_t
universality classes! This high degree of coincidence the conjecture that universal content of is [^1].\ ---------------- --------------------------------- $\quad N\quad$ $\quad Polchinski}\quad$ $\quad\quad R_{\rm opt}\quad\quad$ \[.5ex\] $0$ ${}\quad$ — $\ 0.65788^{a}\ \ \ {}$ $1$ ${}\quad$ $\ 0.65574^{c,e}\ {}$ $\ {}$ $2$ ${}\quad$ $\ 0.6712^{d}\ {}$ $\ 0.671221^{a}\ {}$ $3$ ${}\quad$ $\ 0.6998^{d}\ $\ {}$ ${}\quad$ 0.7338^{d}\ {}$ $\ 0.733753^{a}\ {}$ ---------------- --------------------------------- ------------------------------------ : Subleading correction-to-scaling exponent $\omega$. [**5. Stability**]{}\ Next, analyse the locality and stability structure of flows show that the non-universal of RG flows in the of scaling solution vastly Consider fixed point solution which is non-universal and not measurable in any experiment. Using, the nontrivial scaling solution with $u'_\star \neq$ and $\partial_t the Polchinski obeys differential \[FlowPRGupScal\] 2 u\_’ =2(u\_’)\^2 - 02N u\_”’ -(1+02N-4u\_’)u\_”. For scaling potential behaves as \[solutionPRGExpansionLarge\] u\_() +[subleading]{}. An solution for has been given in [@Kubyshin:2001gz]. On level of the RG flow, this behaviour stems a cancellation between the canonical scaling of the potential and its non-linear renormalisation. From, we the non-trivial quantum contributions the Polchinski flow like \_t
 universality classes! This hiGh degree of CoincIdeNce LeAds tO the Important conjeCTure That the universal contenT of thE pARtiaL DiFfereNtial eqUAtIONs aNd Is EquIvALeNt [^1].\

  ---------------- --------------------------------- ------------------------------------
   $\quaD N\qUad$  $\quad {\Rm PolchinsKi}\qUaD$      $\quad\quad R_{\rm OPt}\Quad\quad$
    \[.5ex\] $0$   ${}\QuaD$ ${}\quad$ —                   $\ 0.65788^{a}\ \ \ {}$
        $1$        ${}\quad$ $\ 0.65574^{c,e}\ {}$           $\ 0.655746^{A}\ {}$
        $2$        ${}\quAd$ $\ 0.6712^{d}\ {}$              $\ 0.671221^{a}\ {}$
        $3$        ${}\quAd$ $\ 0.6998^{D}\ {}$              $\ 0.699837^{a}\ {}$
        $4$        ${}\qUAd$ $\ 0.7338^{d}\ {}$              $\ 0.733753^{a}\ {}$
  ---------------- --------------------------------- ------------------------------------

  : SUblEadinG correCTion-to-Scaling exPoNEnt $\omeGA$.

[**5. StabilITY**]{}\
NExt, wE analyse the localiTY aND stability struCture oF fLOwS ANd sHow That the non-UnIversAL properTIeS OF rG fLOws in the vicinIty of a scaliNG soLution ArE vaSTly difFerenT. CONsiDer the fixed PoinT solution Itself, WHich is nON-univerSal and Not MeaSuraBLe In Any ExPEriMEnT. UsINg, tHe nontriViAl ScaliNg soLUTIOn wiTh $u'_\Star \Neq$ coNst. and $\partial_T
u'_\sTar=0$ oF The polchInski rG obEyS the dIffereNtial EqUation \[FlowPRGupscal\] 2 U\_’ - (d-2)u\_” =2(u\_’)\^2 - 02N u\_”’ -(1+02N-4u\_’)u\_”. for LaRge FiElds, tHE scaliNg pOteNtial beHaves as \[SOluTiONprGexpansionLarge\] u\_() +[subLeADInG]{}. An analyTical sOLuTiON for $N=\infTy$ Has Been GIVen in [@kubySHiN:2001gz]. On the Level oF ThE Rg flow, thIs BehaviOuR stEms From a CAnceLlatioN between The caNOnical scaling oF The potential aND iTS NoN-LineAr rEnormalisatIon. FROm, we ConcLUdE thAT the nOn-triViAL qUAntum contributions tO tHe PolcHinskI flow diverges Like \[PRG-larGEFIeld\] \_t
 universality classes! Thi s high deg ree o f c oin ci denc e le ads to the imp o rtan t conjecture that theunive rs a l co n te nt of  the pa r ti a l  di ff er ent ia l  e quati ons  and is  equivalen t [ ^1 ].\

  ----- - -- -------- - --- ------------ --- ------ -- --- - -- -- --- ----- ------ - ------ --------- -- - -
   $ \ quad N\ q u ad $  $ \quad {\rm Polchi n sk i }\quad$      $ \quad\ qu a dR _ {\r m o pt}\quad\q ua d$
  \[.5ex \ ]$ 0 $   $ {}\quad$ ${}\ quad$ —             $ \ 0.65 788^{ a} \  \\ {}$
       $ 1$       ${}\q u ad$ $\0 .65574^ {c,e}\  {} $      $\0. 6 557 4 6^ {a} \  {} $
      $2 $      $ { } \ quad $ $ \ 0. 6712^ {d}\ {}$          $\  0.67 1221^ {a}\  { }$
      $3$      ${}\quad$ $ \ 0. 6998^{d}\  {} $         $\ 0 .69 983 7^{a}\{}$
     $ 4 $       ${}\quad$ $\0. 7 3 38 ^{d}\ {} $         $\ 0. 73 375 3^{a } \  {}$  -- - -- -------- --- -- - -- -- ------- -- ------ -- --- --- --- - - ---- ------ -------- ----- - ----------

 :  Subleading c o rr e c ti o n-to -sc aling expon ent$ \ome ga$. 
[ **5 .  Stab ility ** ] {} \ 
Next, we analyse t he  local ity a nd stabilitystructureo f flows an d sh o wt hat the non-un ivers al propert i es of RG  flow s in the  vicinity o f a scal ing  so lut ion a re  vastly diffe r e nt.Co nsiderthe  fixedpoi ntsol uti on  itself,which is  n on -u ni ver sal a n d not me as ura bl e i n any experi ment.  Usi ng ,t henontriv i al s cali ng  s olut ion  w ith $ u'_\ s tar  \neq$const. an d $ \ part ia l_ t
u'_\s tar=0$ of the  P olchinskiRG  ob eys th e differen tial equation \[FlowPRG u pScal\]  2u\_’- (d -2)u\_” = 2(u \_’)\^ 2 - 02N u\ _”’ -( 1+02N -4 u\_ ’ ) u\_”. F or  la rg e fields,t h e s calin gpote ntial b ehaves as \[soluti o nPR GExpansionLar ge\ ] u\ _ ( )+[s u bl e adi ng ] {}. A n analytical so lution for  $ N =\ infty$ has bee ngiven i n [@Kub yshin : 2001gz] . On thelevel ofth e RG f low , this beh aviour s tems from a can c el latio n b etween  t hecanon ical s c ali ng of  the p ot ential  andit s non-li near renormalisation. F rom, w e con clu de that t hen on- trivial q uant um contrib uti ons  to t heP olchi nski fl owd iverg es l i ke \[PRG- l ar gef i e ld \] \_t
 universality_classes! This_high degree of coincidence_leads to_the_important conjecture_that_the universal content_of the partial_differential equations and is_equivalent [^1].\

 _----------------_--------------------------------- ------------------------------------
   $\quad N\quad$  $\quad {\rm Polchinski}\quad$    __$\quad\quad R_{\rm_opt}\quad\quad$
__  \[.5ex\] $0$ _ ${}\quad$ ${}\quad$ — _ _       __  _   $\ 0.65788^{a}\ \ \ {}$
 _     _$1$  ___   ${}\quad$_$\ 0.65574^{c,e}\ {}$   _     _ $\ 0.655746^{a}\ {}$
   _    $2$ _    _ ${}\quad$_$\ 0.6712^{d}\ {}$  _  _ _  _   $\ 0.671221^{a}\ {}$
_  _    $3$ __  ___${}\quad$ $\_0.6998^{d}\ {}$ __ __     __ $\ 0.699837^{a}\ {}$
   _   _$4$_   _   ${}\quad$ $\_0.7338^{d}\ {}$    _ _ _     $\ 0.733753^{a}\ {}$
  ---------------- ---------------------------------_------------------------------------

  : Subleading correction-to-scaling exponent_$\omega$.

[**5. Stability**]{}\
Next, we analyse_the locality_and_stability structure of_flows_and show_that the non-universal properties of RG flows_in the_vicinity of a scaling solution are_vastly different. Consider the_fixed_point solution itself, which is non-universal_and not measurable in any experiment._Using, the nontrivial scaling solution_with_$u'_\star_\neq$ const. and $\partial_t
u'_\star=0$ of the_Polchinski RG obeys the differential equation_\[FlowPRGupScal\] 2 u\_’_- (d-2)u\_” =2(u\_’)\^2 - 02N u\_”’ -(1+02N-4u\_’)u\_”._For_large fields, the scaling potential behaves_as_\[solutionPRGExpansionLarge\] u\_() +[subleading]{}. An analytical solution_for_$N=\infty$_has been given in [@Kubyshin:2001gz]._On the level of the RG_flow, this behaviour stems from a cancellation between the_canonical scaling of_the potential and its non-linear_renormalisation._From,_we conclude that the non-trivial quantum contributions to the Polchinski_flow diverges_like \[PRG-largefield\] \_t