T:main1\]): the diagram $$\label{E:diagcomp}
\begin{array}{c}
\xymatrix{
{\mathcal{A}}\big|_x \ar[rr]^-{Y_1}  & & \operatorname{\mathfrak{sl}}\bigl(\operatorname{\mathsf{Hom}}({\mathcal{P}}, {\mathbbm{k}}_x)\bigr) \ar[dd]^{\overline{{\mathsf{m}}}_{x, y}} \\
H^0\bigl({\mathcal{A}}(x)\bigr) \ar[u]^{\operatorname{\mathsf{res}}_x} \ar[d]_{\operatorname{\mathsf{ev}}_y} & &  \\
{\mathcal{A}}\big|_y \ar[rr]^-{Y_2} & & \mathfrak{pgl}\bigl(\operatorname{\mathsf{Hom}}({\mathcal{P}}, {\mathbbm{k}}_y)\bigr)
}
\end{array}$$ is commutative, where $Y_1$ and $Y_2$ are certain canonical anti-isomorphisms of Lie algebras. A version of this important fact has been stated in [@Polishchuk1 Theorem 4(b)].

Using the commutative diagram (\[E:diagcomp\]), we prove Theorem A. As a consequence, we obtain the continuity property of the solution $r_{(E, (n, d))}$ with respect to the Weierstraß parameters $g_2$ and $g_3$ of the curve $E$. This actually leads to certain unexpected analytic consequences about classical $r$–matrices, see Corollary \[C:AnalyticConseq\].

The above construction can be rephrased in the following way. Let $E$ be an arbitrary Weierstraß cubic curve. Then there exists a canonical meromorphic section $$r \in \Gamma\bigl(\breve{E} \times \breve{E}, p_1^{*}{\mathcal{A}}\otimes p_2^{*}{\mathcal{A}}\bigr),$$ where $p_1, p_2: \breve{E} \times \breve{E} \rightarrow E$ are canonical projections, satisfying the equation $$\bigl[r^{12}, r^{13}\bigr] + \bigl[r^{13}, r^{23}\bigr] + \bigl[r^{12}, r^{23}\bigr] = 0,$$ see Theorem \[T:main2\]. It seems that in the case of elliptic curves
T: main1\ ] ): the diagram $ $ \label{E: diagcomp } 
 \begin{array}{c } 
 \xymatrix { 
 { \mathcal{A}}\big|_x \ar[rr]^-{Y_1 }   & & \operatorname{\mathfrak{sl}}\bigl(\operatorname{\mathsf{Hom}}({\mathcal{P } }, { \mathbbm{k}}_x)\bigr) \ar[dd]^{\overline{{\mathsf{m}}}_{x, y } } \\ 
 H^0\bigl({\mathcal{A}}(x)\bigr) \ar[u]^{\operatorname{\mathsf{res}}_x } \ar[d]_{\operatorname{\mathsf{ev}}_y } & &   \\ 
 { \mathcal{A}}\big|_y \ar[rr]^-{Y_2 } & & \mathfrak{pgl}\bigl(\operatorname{\mathsf{Hom}}({\mathcal{P } }, { \mathbbm{k}}_y)\bigr) 
 } 
 \end{array}$$ is commutative, where $ Y_1 $ and $ Y_2 $ are certain canonical anti - isomorphisms of Lie algebra. A interpretation of this important fact has been stated in [ @Polishchuk1 Theorem 4(b) ]. 

 use the commutative diagram (\[E: diagcomp\ ]), we test Theorem A. As a consequence, we obtain the continuity property of the solution $ r_{(E, (n, d))}$ with regard to the Weierstraß parameter $ g_2 $ and $ g_3 $ of the curve $ E$. This actually contribute to certain unexpected analytic consequences about authoritative $ r$–matrices, see Corollary \[C: AnalyticConseq\ ]. 

 The above construction can be rephrased in the following direction. Let $ E$ be an arbitrary Weierstraß cubic curve. Then there exists a canonical meromorphic section $ $ roentgen \in \Gamma\bigl(\breve{E } \times \breve{E }, p_1^{*}{\mathcal{A}}\otimes p_2^{*}{\mathcal{A}}\bigr),$$ where $ p_1, p_2: \breve{E } \times \breve{E } \rightarrow E$ are canonical projections, satisfying the equality $ $ \bigl[r^{12 }, r^{13}\bigr ] + \bigl[r^{13 }, r^{23}\bigr ] + \bigl[r^{12 }, r^{23}\bigr ] = 0,$$ see Theorem \[T: main2\ ]. It seems that in the font of elliptic curve
T:maln1\]): the diagram $$\label{E:diancomp}
\begin{array}{c}
\rtmatrie{
{\mathcam{A}}\big|_x \af[rr]^-{Y_1}  & & \operatorname{\mathfrak{dl}}\vigl(\okvratorname{\mathsf{Hom}}({\maghcal{P}}, {\manhbbm{k}}_x)\bitr) \ac[dd]^{\overline{{\mathsh{j}}}_{x, y}} \\
H^0\blyl({\matggal{A}}(x)\yijr) \ar[u]^{\operatornsme{\mathsf{ras}}_x} \ar[d]_{\operatosnxmz{\mathsf{ev}}_y} & &  \\
{\mathcal{A}}\big|_y \ar[rr]^-{Y_2} & & \mwthfrak{lgp}\bigl(\operatornwme{\msehsf{Gom}}({\mathcal{P}}, {\mathbbm{k}}_y)\bigr)
}
\end{array}$$ js commltative, where $Y_1$ amd $Y_2$ are certain canonical antl-isomorphisms of Lle algebras. A vqesion of thir importanu yact has begn stated in [@Polishchuk1 Theorem 4(c)].

Usiny the commujcrivf diagram (\[E:dmagcomi\]), we prove Thcprem A. As a cpnsequence, we pbtein rhe continuity propervy of the solution $r_{(G, (n, d))}$ with rzspect to the Weiersteaß paraketess $g_2$ qnd $g_3$ kf tge curge $X$. This actuzlly leads ro certain unexpecttd wbalytic consesuencef wbout classical $r$–matrices, see Corollary \[C:AhalyticConseq\].

The above xonstruction can be rgphrased ig the following way. Let $E$ be an arbitrary Weierstsaß cuuiz cbvye. Tfwn there exists a canonical meromorphic section $$d \on \Gamma\bigl(\brevc{E} \times \breve{E}, p_1^{*}{\mstjcsj{A}}\otimes p_2^{*}{\matfcal{A}}\bnfr),$$ where $p_1, p_2: \breve{E} \himes \bteve{E} \eightarror E$ sre canonical projections, sqtisfying thv eqyation $$\bigl[r^{12}, r^{13}\bigr] + \bigl[r^{13}, r^{23}\biyr] + \bibl[r^{12}, r^{23}\nigr] = 0,$$ see Theorem \[T:maiu2\]. It ssems that ij the cass of elliptic curxes
T:main1\]): the diagram $$\label{E:diagcomp} \begin{array}{c} \xymatrix{ {\mathcal{A}}\big|_x & {\mathbbm{k}}_x)\bigr) \ar[dd]^{\overline{{\mathsf{m}}}_{x, \\ H^0\bigl({\mathcal{A}}(x)\bigr) \ar[u]^{\operatorname{\mathsf{res}}_x} \ar[rr]^-{Y_2} & \mathfrak{pgl}\bigl(\operatorname{\mathsf{Hom}}({\mathcal{P}}, {\mathbbm{k}}_y)\bigr) \end{array}$$ is commutative, $Y_1$ and $Y_2$ are certain canonical of Lie algebras. A version of this important fact has been stated in Theorem 4(b)]. Using the commutative diagram (\[E:diagcomp\]), we prove Theorem A. As a we the property the solution $r_{(E, (n, d))}$ with respect to the Weierstraß parameters $g_2$ and $g_3$ of the $E$. This actually leads to certain unexpected analytic about classical $r$–matrices, see \[C:AnalyticConseq\]. The above construction can rephrased the following Let be arbitrary Weierstraß cubic Then there exists a canonical meromorphic section $$r \in \Gamma\bigl(\breve{E} \times \breve{E}, p_1^{*}{\mathcal{A}}\otimes p_2^{*}{\mathcal{A}}\bigr),$$ where $p_1, p_2: \times \breve{E} are canonical satisfying equation r^{13}\bigr] + \bigl[r^{13}, \bigl[r^{12}, r^{23}\bigr] = 0,$$ see Theorem that in the case of elliptic curves
T:main1\]): the diagram $$\label{E:diagComp}
\begin{aRray}{c}
\XymAtrIx{
{\MathCal{A}}\Big|_x \ar[rr]^-{Y_1}  & & \operaTOrnaMe{\mathfrak{sl}}\bigl(\operatOrnamE{\mAThsf{hOm}}({\MathcAl{P}}, {\mathBBm{K}}_X)\BigR) \aR[dD]^{\ovErLInE{{\mathSf{m}}}_{X, y}} \\
H^0\bigl({\Mathcal{A}}(x)\bIgr) \Ar[U]^{\operatornamE{\MaThsf{res}}_x} \ar[D]_{\opEratorname{\maThsF{ev}}_y} & &  \\
{\maThCal{a}}\Big|_y \aR[rr]^-{y_2} & & \mathFrak{pgL}\Bigl(\opEratornamE{\mAThsf{HoM}}({\Mathcal{p}}, {\MAtHbbm{K}}_y)\bigr)
}
\end{array}$$ is cOMmUTative, where $Y_1$ anD $Y_2$ are cErTAiN CAnoNicAl anti-isomOrPhismS Of Lie alGEbRAS. a veRSion of this impOrtant fact hAS beEn statEd In [@POLishchUk1 TheOrEM 4(b)].

USing the commUtatIve diagraM (\[E:diagCOmp\]), we prOVe TheorEm A. As a ConSeqUencE, We ObTaiN tHE coNTiNuiTY prOperty of ThE sOlutiOn $r_{(E, (N, D))}$ WITh reSpeCt to The WeIerstraß paramEteRs $g_2$ aND $g_3$ oF the cUrve $E$. this AcTuallY leads To cerTaIn unexpected anaLytiC consequeNceS aBouT cLassiCAl $r$–matRicEs, sEe CorolLary \[C:AnALytIccONSeQ\].

The above constructIoN CAn Be rephraSed in tHE fOlLOwing way. leT $E$ bE an aRBItrarY WeiERsTraß cubiC curve. tHeN tHere exiStS a canoNiCal MerOmorpHIc seCtion $$r \In \Gamma\bIgl(\brEVe{E} \times \breve{E}, P_1^{*}{\Mathcal{A}}\otimeS P_2^{*}{\mATHcAL{A}}\biGr),$$ wHere $p_1, p_2: \breve{e} \timES \breVe{E} \rIGhTarROw E$ arE canoNiCAl PRojections, satisfyinG tHe equaTion $$\bIgl[r^{12}, r^{13}\bigr] + \bigl[R^{13}, r^{23}\bigr] + \bigl[R^{12}, R^{23}\BIgr] = 0,$$ see ThEoreM \[t:mAIn2\]. It seems that iN the cAse of ellipTIc curves
T:main1\]): the diagram $$ \label{E:d iagco mp} 
\b eg in{a rray }{c}
\xymatrix { 
{\m athcal{A}}\big|_x \ar[ rr]^- {Y _ 1} &  &  \ope ratorna m e{ \ m ath fr ak {sl }} \ bi gl(\o per atornam e{\mathsf{ Hom }} ({\mathcal{P } },  {\mathbbm {k} }_x)\bigr) \ ar[ dd]^{\ ov erl i ne{{\ mat hsf{m }}}_{x ,  y}} \ \
H^0\big l( { \mathc a l{A}}(x ) \ bi gr)\ar[u]^{\operator n am e {\mathsf{res}} _x} \a r[ d ]_ { \ ope rat orname{\ma th sf{ev } }_y} &&  \ \ {\m a thcal{A}}\big |_y \ar[rr] ^ -{Y _2} &&\ma t hfrak{ pgl}\ bi g l(\ operatornam e{\m athsf{Hom }}({\m a thcal{P } }, {\ma thbbm{ k}} _y) \big r )}\en d{ a rra y }$ $ i s  co mmutativ e,  w here$Y_1 $ a n d $Y _2$  are  cert ain canonical  an ti-i s omo rphis ms of  Lie  a lgebr as. Aversi on  of this import antfact hasbee nsta te d in[ @Polis hch uk1  Theore m 4(b)] . 

U si n g th e commutative diag ra m (\ [E:diagc omp\]) ,  w ep rove The or emA. A s a con sequ e nc e, we ob tain t h eco ntinuit yproper ty  of  th e sol u tion  $r_{( E, (n, d ))}$w ith respect to the Weierstra ß  p a r am e ters  $g _2$ and $g_ 3$ o f  the  cur v e$E$ .  This  actu al l yl eads to certain une xp ectedanaly tic consequen ces aboutc l a ssical $ r$–m a tr i ces, see Corol lary\[C:Analyt i cConseq\ ].

T he above  construc t i on can b e r eph ras edi n  t he followingw a y. L et  $E$ be  an  arbitr ary  We ier str aß  cubic cu rve. The nth er eexi sts a canonica lmer om orp hic s e ction$$r \ in \ Ga mm a \bi gl(\bre v e{ E }  \ti me s\bre ve{ E} , p_1 ^{*} { \ma thcal{A }}\otimes  p_ 2 ^{*} {\ ma thcal{A }}\bigr),$$ w he re $p_1, p _2 : \ breve{ E }  \times\breve{E} \rightarrow E $  are ca non icalproj ections,sat isfyin g t h e equa tion $ $\big l[ r^{ 1 2 }, r^ { 1 3} \bi gr ] + \bigl[ r ^ {13 }, r^ {2 3}\b igr] +\bigl[r^{12}, r^{2 3 }\b igr] = 0,$$ s eeTheo r e m\[T : ma i n2\ ]. Its e ems that in the  case of e ll i pt ic curves
T:main1\]): the_diagram $$\label{E:diagcomp}
\begin{array}{c}
\xymatrix{
{\mathcal{A}}\big|_x_\ar[rr]^-{Y_1}  & &_\operatorname{\mathfrak{sl}}\bigl(\operatorname{\mathsf{Hom}}({\mathcal{P}}, {\mathbbm{k}}_x)\bigr)_\ar[dd]^{\overline{{\mathsf{m}}}_{x,_y}} \\
H^0\bigl({\mathcal{A}}(x)\bigr)_\ar[u]^{\operatorname{\mathsf{res}}_x}_\ar[d]_{\operatorname{\mathsf{ev}}_y} & &_ \\
{\mathcal{A}}\big|_y \ar[rr]^-{Y_2}_& & \mathfrak{pgl}\bigl(\operatorname{\mathsf{Hom}}({\mathcal{P}}, {\mathbbm{k}}_y)\bigr)
}
\end{array}$$_is commutative, where_$Y_1$_and $Y_2$ are certain canonical anti-isomorphisms of Lie algebras. A version of this important_fact_has been_stated_in_[@Polishchuk1 Theorem 4(b)].

Using the commutative_diagram (\[E:diagcomp\]), we prove Theorem_A. As_a consequence, we obtain the continuity property of_the_solution $r_{(E, (n,_d))}$ with respect to the Weierstraß parameters $g_2$ and_$g_3$ of the curve $E$. This_actually leads to_certain_unexpected_analytic consequences about classical_$r$–matrices, see Corollary \[C:AnalyticConseq\].

The above construction_can be rephrased in the following_way. Let $E$ be an arbitrary Weierstraß_cubic curve. Then there exists a_canonical meromorphic section $$r \in_\Gamma\bigl(\breve{E} \times_\breve{E}, p_1^{*}{\mathcal{A}}\otimes p_2^{*}{\mathcal{A}}\bigr),$$ where $p_1,_p_2: \breve{E} \times_\breve{E} \rightarrow_E$ are canonical_projections, satisfying the equation $$\bigl[r^{12}, r^{13}\bigr]_+ \bigl[r^{13}, r^{23}\bigr]_+ \bigl[r^{12}, r^{23}\bigr] = 0,$$ see_Theorem_\[T:main2\]. It seems_that_in_the case_of elliptic curves