 populations in modes $i$ and $j$ are well known [@armstrong]. For a resonant two-state model the characteristic coupling time is $T=\left|\sqrt{2}\hbar/g M_{ij}b^{r}_{i}(0)\right|$. In terms of the dimensionless matrix elements $m^{q}_{ij}$ this can be written; $$T=\left|\frac{15\lambda^{-\frac{13}{30}}}{8\pi m^{q}_{ij}b^{r}_{i}(0)
\omega_{r}}\left(\frac{15C}{64\pi}\right)^{-3/5} \right|$$ For $\lambda \approx 1.95$, and $C=1000$ the quantal prediction is $|m^{q}_{12}|$=0.013 compared with the hydrodynamic result [@oxfthy] $|m^{h}_{12}|$=0.028 (the dotted line in figure \[fig:coup\]). Suppose that only 5% of atoms were initially in the pump mode, then $|b^{r}_{1}(0)|^{2}$=0.05. It follows, for $C=1000$ and $\lambda=1.95$, that the respective coupling times are $T^q$=14.60 ms compared with $T^{h}$=6.78 ms, which is a substantial and measurable difference. However two excited hybrid modes are present near second-harmonic resonance. A numerical solution of equations (\[motion1\],\[motion2\]) for a pump population of 10% at $\lambda=2$ shows the interplay of the hybrid modes: figure \[fig:conversion\] (a). The nonresonant surface hybrid grows faster due to the larger coupling strength, but is not as efficiently converted as the resonant breather hybrid state. The fundamental mode revives [@nonlin_mix] after $\sim 40$ms for these parameters. Since the two hybrid modes differ in frequency and symmetry this phenomenon should be detectable by observation of the radial and axial density variations as developed in current experiments [@oxfexp]. In figure \[fig:conversion\] (b) corresponding to $\lambda=1.65$, very low conversion efficiency is observed due to poor phase-matching. Moreover, in this case the dark-state hybrid (short-dashed line) is completely suppressed.

In conclusion, we find the hybridization of Bogoliubov modes plays a vital role in mode mixing, both in the coupling strength and resonant frequency. Another consequence is the
populations in modes $ i$ and $ j$ are well known [ @armstrong ]. For a resonant two - state exemplar the characteristic yoke time is $ T=\left|\sqrt{2}\hbar / g M_{ij}b^{r}_{i}(0)\right|$. In terms of the dimensionless matrix elements $ m^{q}_{ij}$ this can be publish; $ $ T=\left|\frac{15\lambda^{-\frac{13}{30}}}{8\pi m^{q}_{ij}b^{r}_{i}(0) 
 \omega_{r}}\left(\frac{15C}{64\pi}\right)^{-3/5 } \right|$$ For $ \lambda \approx 1.95 $, and $ C=1000 $ the quantal prediction is $ |m^{q}_{12}|$=0.013 compare with the hydrodynamic result [ @oxfthy ] $ |m^{h}_{12}|$=0.028 (the dotted tune in number \[fig: coup\ ]). Suppose that merely 5% of atoms were initially in the pump mood, then $ |b^{r}_{1}(0)|^{2}$=0.05. It follows, for $ C=1000 $ and $ \lambda=1.95 $, that the respective coupling time are $ T^q$=14.60 ms compared with $ T^{h}$=6.78 ms, which is a substantial and measurable difference. However two excited loanblend modes are present near second - harmonic resonance. A numeral solution of equations (\[motion1\],\[motion2\ ]) for a pump population of 10% at $ \lambda=2 $ shows the interplay of the loanblend modes: design \[fig: conversion\ ] (a). The nonresonant airfoil hybrid grows faster ascribable to the larger coupling strength, but is not as efficiently converted as the resonant breath hybrid state. The fundamental mode revives [ @nonlin_mix ] after $ \sim 40$ms for these parameters. Since the two hybrid modes differ in frequency and symmetry this phenomenon should be detectable by observation of the radial and axial concentration mutant as developed in current experiment [ @oxfexp ]. In figure \[fig: conversion\ ] (b) corresponding to $ \lambda=1.65 $, very low conversion efficiency is watch due to poor phase - matching. Moreover, in this case the dark - department of state hybrid (short - dashed line) is completely suppressed. 

 In ending, we find the hybridization of Bogoliubov modes plays a vital role in mode mix, both in the yoke lastingness and resonant frequency. Another consequence is the
 pooulations in modes $i$ and $j$ are well knocb [@armsvrong]. Fkr a resunant two-state model the chacactwristuc coupling time is $T=\ldft|\sqrt{2}\hbwr/g M_{ij}b^{e}_{i}(0)\rijht|$. In terms of vge dimekfionmcss mctcix elements $m^{q}_{lj}$ this can be written; $$T=\lafg|\fxac{15\lambda^{-\frac{13}{30}}}{8\pi m^{q}_{ij}b^{r}_{i}(0)
\omega_{r}}\left(\fras{15C}{64\pi}\rignt)^{-3/5} \right|$$ For $\lamfda \s[pros 1.95$, and $C=1000$ the quantal prediction is $|m^{q}_{12}|$=0.013 comkared with the hydtodynamic result [@oxfthy] $|m^{h}_{12}|$=0.028 (the dotted line in fihure \[fig:couk\]). Su[pose that onuy 5% of atoms were initjally in the pump mode, then $|b^{r}_{1}(0)|^{2}$=0.05. Kt foklows, for $X=1000$ qnd $\nambda=1.95$, that the gespective comiling thmes arr $T^q$=14.60 ms comparcd wivh $T^{y}$=6.78 ms, which is a substential and measurablg differenwe. However two exciree hybtid mmdes qre prtseit hear sfcoid-harmonic desonance. A numerical solution os equations (\[mofion1\],\[moeijn2\]) for a pump population of 10% at $\lambda=2$ vhoss the interplay of the hybrid modes: figure \[vig:converfion\] (a). The nonresonant surface hybrid grows fastes due go uhc uqrher coupling strength, but is not as efficientjg vokverted as the rcsonant breather hubgic state. The fuvdamenczl mode revives [@nonlln_mix] aster $\wim 40$ms fow thrse parameters. Since the twi hybrid modvs duffer in frequency and symmetxy thix phemomenon should be deteccable gy observatlon of ths radial and axiau dvnsidy variaukons as developed in curreit ex'erimentr [@oxgexp]. Ig figure \[flg:conyarsion\] (b) corresponfing jo $\lamtda=1.65$, very llw conversion efficiency is obsxcved due to ppos pvase-matcking. Mpreover, in thys case the datk-state hvbrid (rhort-dashes line) ms completelr suppressed.

It conclusion, xe find tre htbrieizatiov of Bogoliubov modes plcvs a vitao role in mode mixlng, bufh in the couplnug strength and rrsovane vrxquensf. Another cotseqjenzr is ghe
populations in modes $i$ and $j$ are [@armstrong]. a resonant model the characteristic In of the dimensionless elements $m^{q}_{ij}$ this be written; $$T=\left|\frac{15\lambda^{-\frac{13}{30}}}{8\pi m^{q}_{ij}b^{r}_{i}(0) \omega_{r}}\left(\frac{15C}{64\pi}\right)^{-3/5} \right|$$ $\lambda \approx 1.95$, and $C=1000$ the quantal prediction is $|m^{q}_{12}|$=0.013 compared with the result [@oxfthy] $|m^{h}_{12}|$=0.028 (the dotted line in figure \[fig:coup\]). Suppose that only 5% atoms initially the mode, then $|b^{r}_{1}(0)|^{2}$=0.05. It follows, for $C=1000$ and $\lambda=1.95$, that the respective coupling times are $T^q$=14.60 compared with $T^{h}$=6.78 ms, which is a substantial measurable difference. However two hybrid modes are present near resonance. numerical solution equations for pump population of at $\lambda=2$ shows the interplay of the hybrid modes: figure \[fig:conversion\] (a). The nonresonant surface hybrid grows due to coupling strength, is as converted as the hybrid state. The fundamental mode revives 40$ms for these parameters. Since the two hybrid differ in and symmetry this phenomenon should be by observation of the radial and axial density as developed in current experiments [@oxfexp]. In figure \[fig:conversion\] (b) corresponding to $\lambda=1.65$, very low is observed due to phase-matching. Moreover, in case dark-state (short-dashed is completely In conclusion, we find the hybridization of Bogoliubov modes plays a role in mode mixing, both in the coupling strength and Another is the
 populations in modes $i$ and $j$ arE well known [@ArmstRonG]. FoR a ResoNant Two-state model tHE chaRacteristic coupling timE is $T=\lEfT|\Sqrt{2}\HBaR/g M_{ij}B^{r}_{i}(0)\righT|$. in TERms Of ThE diMeNSiOnlesS maTrix eleMents $m^{q}_{ij}$ tHis CaN be written; $$T=\lEFt|\Frac{15\lambda^{-\FraC{13}{30}}}{8\pi m^{q}_{ij}b^{r}_{i}(0)
\omEga_{R}}\left(\fRaC{15C}{64\pI}\Right)^{-3/5} \RigHt|$$ For $\Lambda \APprox 1.95$, aNd $C=1000$ the quaNtAL prediCTion is $|m^{Q}_{12}|$=0.013 COmPareD with the hydrodynaMIc REsult [@oxfthy] $|m^{h}_{12}|$=0.028 (tHe dottEd LInE IN fiGurE \[fig:coup\]). SuPpOse thAT only 5% of AToMS WEre INitially in the Pump mode, theN $|B^{r}_{1}(0)|^{2}$=0.05. IT folloWs, For $c=1000$ And $\lamBda=1.95$, thAt THe rEspective coUpliNg times arE $T^q$=14.60 ms cOMpared wITh $T^{h}$=6.78 ms, wHich is A suBstAntiAL aNd MeaSuRAblE DiFfeREncE. However TwO eXciteD hybRID MOdes Are PresEnt neAr second-harmoNic ResoNAncE. A numEricaL solUtIon of EquatiOns (\[moTiOn1\],\[motion2\]) for a pumP popUlation of 10% At $\lAmBda=2$ ShOws thE InterpLay Of tHe hybriD modes: fIGurE \[fIG:COnVersion\] (a). The nonresoNaNT SuRface hybRid groWS fAsTEr due to tHe LarGer cOUPling StreNGtH, but is noT as effICiEnTly convErTed as tHe ResOnaNt breATher Hybrid State. The FundaMEntal mode revivES [@nonlin_mix] aftER $\sIM 40$Ms FOr thEse Parameters. SInce THe twO hybRId ModES diffEr in fReQUeNCy and symmetry this phEnOmenon ShoulD be detectable By observatION Of the radIal aND aXIal density variAtionS as developED in curreNt expEriments [@Oxfexp]. In fIGUre \[fig:coNveRsiOn\] (b) CorRESpOnding to $\lambdA=1.65$, VEry lOw ConversIon EfficieNcy Is oBseRveD dUe to poor pHase-matcHiNg. moReOveR, in thIS case the DaRk-sTaTe hYbrid (SHort-daShed lIne) iS cOmPLetEly suppREsSED.

In cOnClUsioN, we FiNd the HybrIDizAtion of bogoliuboV moDEs plAyS a Vital roLe in mode mixinG, bOth in the coUpLinG strenGTH and resoNant frequency. Another conSEquence Is tHe
 populations in modes $i$and $j$ ar e wel l k now n[@ar mstr ong]. For a re s onan t two-state model thechara ct e rist i ccoupl ing tim e  i s $T= \l ef t|\ sq r t{ 2}\hb ar/ g M_{ij }b^{r}_{i} (0) \r ight|$. In t e rm s of the d ime nsionless ma tri x elem en ts$ m^{q} _{i j}$ t his ca n  be wr itten; $$ T= \ left|\ f rac{15\ l a mb da^{ -\frac{13}{30}}}{ 8 \p i  m^{q}_{ij}b^{ r}_{i} (0 ) 
\ o m ega _{r }}\left(\f ra c{15C } {64\pi} \ ri g h t )^{ - 3/5} \right|$ $ For $\lam b da\appro x1.9 5 $, and  $C=1 00 0 $ t he quantalpred iction is  $|m^{ q }_{12}| $ =0.013compar edwit h th e  h yd rod yn a mic re sul t  [@ oxfthy]$| m^ {h}_{ 12}| $ = 0 . 028(th e do ttedline in figur e \ [fig : cou p\]).  Supp oseth at on ly 5%of at om s were initiall y in  the pump  mo de , t he n $|b ^ {r}_{1 }(0 )|^ {2}$=0. 05. Itf oll ow s , fo r $C=1000$ and $\l am b d a= 1.95$, t hat th e  r es p ective c ou pli ng t i m es ar e $T ^ q$ =14.60 m s comp a re dwith $T ^{ h}$=6. 78  ms , w hichi s asubsta ntial an d mea s urable differe n ce. However t w oe x ci t ed h ybr id modes ar e pr e sent  nea r  s eco n d-har monic  r e so n ance. A numerical s ol utionof eq uations (\[mo tion1\],\[ m o t ion2\])fora  p u mp populationof 10 % at $\lam b da=2$ sh ows t he inter play of t h e  hybridmod es:  fi gur e \[ fig:conversio n \ ] (a ).  The no nre sonantsur fac e h ybr id  grows fa ster due  t oth elar ger c o upling s tr eng th , b ut is not as  effi cien tl yc onv erted a s  t h e  res on an t br eat he r hyb rids tat e. Thefundament alm odere vi ves [@n onlin_mix] af te r $\sim 40 $m s f or the s e  paramet ers. Since the two hybr i d modes  di fferin f requencyand  symme try this p henome non s ho uld b e det e c ta ble  b y observat i o n o f the  r adia l and a xial density varia t ion s as develope d i n cu r r en t e x pe r ime nt s  [@ o x fexp]. In figur e \[fig:co nv e rs ion\] (b)c orr es ponding  to $\l ambda = 1.65$,very lowconversio neffi c i enc y is obser ved dueto poor p h ase-m a tc hing.  Mo reover ,inthiscase t h e d ark-s tate h yb rid (s hort- da shed lin e) is completely suppre ssed.
In c onc lusion, w e f i ndthe hybri diza tion of Bo gol iub ov mo des plays  a v i ta l r o le in  mod e  mixing,b ot h i n th e couplings t r eng th an d r e sonant  fre quency. Another c o nsequence is t he
 populations_in modes_$i$ and $j$ are_well known_[@armstrong]._For a_resonant_two-state model the_characteristic coupling time_is $T=\left|\sqrt{2}\hbar/g M_{ij}b^{r}_{i}(0)\right|$. In_terms of the_dimensionless_matrix elements $m^{q}_{ij}$ this can be written; $$T=\left|\frac{15\lambda^{-\frac{13}{30}}}{8\pi m^{q}_{ij}b^{r}_{i}(0)
\omega_{r}}\left(\frac{15C}{64\pi}\right)^{-3/5} \right|$$ For $\lambda \approx 1.95$,_and_$C=1000$ the_quantal_prediction_is $|m^{q}_{12}|$=0.013 compared with the_hydrodynamic result [@oxfthy] $|m^{h}_{12}|$=0.028 (the_dotted line_in figure \[fig:coup\]). Suppose that only 5% of_atoms_were initially in_the pump mode, then $|b^{r}_{1}(0)|^{2}$=0.05. It follows, for $C=1000$_and $\lambda=1.95$, that the respective coupling_times are $T^q$=14.60_ms_compared_with $T^{h}$=6.78 ms, which_is a substantial and measurable difference._However two excited hybrid modes are_present near second-harmonic resonance. A numerical solution_of equations (\[motion1\],\[motion2\]) for a pump_population of 10% at $\lambda=2$_shows the_interplay of the hybrid modes:_figure \[fig:conversion\] (a)._The nonresonant_surface hybrid grows_faster due to the larger coupling_strength, but is_not as efficiently converted as the_resonant_breather hybrid state._The_fundamental_mode revives_[@nonlin_mix] after $\sim_40$ms_for these_parameters._Since the two hybrid modes differ_in_frequency and symmetry this phenomenon should be_detectable by observation of_the_radial and axial density_variations as developed in current_experiments [@oxfexp]. In figure \[fig:conversion\] (b)_corresponding to_$\lambda=1.65$, very_low conversion efficiency is observed due to poor phase-matching. Moreover, in_this case the dark-state hybrid (short-dashed_line) is completely suppressed.

In_conclusion, we_find_the hybridization of_Bogoliubov_modes plays_a vital role in mode mixing, both_in the_coupling strength and resonant frequency. Another_consequence is the