 than for pullers); whereas when $r_c=1.5 \sigma$, $P(s)$ corresponds to high polar order for large clusters with $\beta=0$ and weak pullers. The same features can be observed when $\xi=10$, independently on $r_c$. $P(s)$ for WP squirmers vanishes for all cluster sizes, independently of $\beta$ and $r_c$ when $\xi=1$, since the formation of trimers and chains assemble the particles head to head, thus it avoids the polar order. However, when $\xi=10$, the polar order decays with $s$: for $r_c=1.5\sigma$ weak pullers form clusters with high polar order, while for $r_c=2.5\sigma$ $P(s)$ decays faster for pushers than for pullers. In the latter case, the WP squirmers show another type of alignment, with particles with a high nematic order in the range of $\beta=0$ and weak pushers.

During aggregation, we have identified seven different cases depending on whether the attractive patch is oriented against the propulsion direction (AP squirmers) or directed towards it (WP squirmers): 3 gas states, 3 clustering cases and 1 coarsening. On the one side, AP squirmers coarsen isotropically if the interaction is strong enough $\xi \approx 0.1$. When the interaction strength competes with self-propulsion ($\xi =1$), dynamic clusters emerge whose mean size depend on hydrodynamic stresses. When activity dominates ($\xi =10$), particles form a gas and depending on the value of $\beta$ this gas can be isotropically oriented or polarly oriented. On the other side, WP squirmers form chains of particles if the interaction is high enough ($\xi \approx 0.1$), or a suspension of trimers and tetramers if the interaction competes with the active propulsion ($\xi =1$). Whenever activity dominates ($\xi =10$), particles form a gas and depending on the value of $\beta$ this gas can be isotropic, polar or even nematically oriented.

Therefore, on one hand anisotropy drives the formation of structures of trimers and tetramers for WP squirmers; on the other hand anisotropy modulates the sensitivity of the hydrodynamic signature: while WP squirmers are more sensitive to $r_c$ when $\xi=10$, AP squirmers
than for pullers); whereas when $ r_c=1.5 \sigma$, $ P(s)$ corresponds to high polar order for big bunch with $ \beta=0 $ and weak pullers. The like features can be observe when $ \xi=10 $, independently on $ r_c$. $ P(s)$ for WP squirmers vanishes for all cluster size, independently of $ \beta$ and $ r_c$ when $ \xi=1 $, since the formation of trimers and range assemble the particles read/write head to head, thus it avoid the polar order. However, when $ \xi=10 $, the polar order decays with $ s$: for $ r_c=1.5\sigma$ weak puller form clusters with high pivotal order, while for $ r_c=2.5\sigma$ $ P(s)$ decays faster for pusher than for pullers. In the latter case, the WP squirmers show another type of alliance, with particles with a high nematic order in the range of $ \beta=0 $ and weak pushers. 

 During aggregation, we have identified seven different cases depending on whether the attractive patch is oriented against the propulsion direction (AP squirmers) or directed towards it (WP squirmers ): 3 gasoline states, 3 clustering case and 1 coarsen. On the one side, AP squirmers coarsen isotropically if the interaction is potent enough $ \xi \approx 0.1$. When the interaction lastingness competes with self - propulsion ($ \xi = 1 $), dynamic bunch emerge whose mean size depend on hydrodynamic stresses. When activity dominates ($ \xi = 10 $), particles form a gas and depending on the value of $ \beta$ this gas can be isotropically oriented or polarly orient. On the early slope, WP squirmers form chains of particles if the interaction is eminent enough ($ \xi \approx 0.1 $), or a suspension of trimers and tetramers if the interaction competes with the active propulsion ($ \xi = 1 $). Whenever natural process dominates ($ \xi = 10 $), particles form a gas and depending on the value of $ \beta$ this natural gas can be isotropic, polar or even nematically orient. 

 Therefore, on one hired hand anisotropy drives the constitution of structures of trimer and tetramers for WP squirmers; on the other bridge player anisotropy modulates the sensitivity of the hydrodynamic signature: while WP squirmers are more sensible to $ r_c$ when $ \xi=10 $, AP squirmers
 thwn for pullers); whereas wmen $r_c=1.5 \sigma$, $P(s)$ eirrespmnds tk high pular order for large clusterd qith $\veta=0$ and weak pullers. Ghe same veatures can ve observev when $\xl=10$, indsiendeutoy on $r_c$. $P(s)$ fot WP squirmess vanishes fos xlp cluster sizes, independently of $\beea$ and $t_c$ when $\xi=1$, since the sormzniin of trimers and chains assejble tht particles head tp head, thus it avoids the oolag order. However, whfn $\xi=10$, the pilar irder decays with $s$: fog $r_c=1.5\sigma$ wgak pullers form clusters with hkgh pplar order, wyilf for $r_c=2.5\sigme$ $P(s)$ dvcays faster npr pusvers thsn for pullers. In thw latter case, the WP vquirmers show anojher type mf alignment, with pqrriclev widh a yigf ntmavic order in the range of $\beta=0$ ane weak pushers.

Durinb wtgregation, we have ydqntified seven different cases dependinc oh whether the attractivw patch is oriented ahainst thq propulsion direction (AP squirmers) or directed tmwarda it (WI sqjurlers): 3 gas states, 3 clustering cases and 1 coarsqhimg. On the one sibe, AP squirmers vowrxgn isotropicaluy if cge interaction is stgong enjugh $\zi \approx 0.1$. Whrn the interaction strength competes winh swlf-propulsion ($\xi =1$), bynamic cluscers ekerge whose mean size depend on gydrodynamif stressea. When activity dumikatas ($\xi =10$), particles form a gaf and depxndiny on the valoe of $\bqta$ this gws cak be isotropically lrienjed or polarly ogiented. On the other side, WP sqnmrmers form cnahns of partncles lf the interactyon is high enpugh ($\xi \apprux 0.1$), or a slspension of trimers and tetramerv if the intecaction cjmperes qith thd active propulxion ($\xi =1$). Ckenever axtivity dominates ($\wi =10$), pxdticles form a ycs and depending pn ghe vwlne of $\teta$ this gav cav bd isotfopic, polar ur efen nematically orietted.

Fherefore, on one hsnq anisottopy drivqs the formatoon of structures lf trmmers end teyraiers for WP squirmers; on the ofher hand anlsotropy modujatew the sensitnvity of the hydrodynamic signature: whilx WP squirmers are morg sensitive to $r_c$ wheu $\wi=10$, AP squirmxrs
than for pullers); whereas when $r_c=1.5 \sigma$, to polar order large clusters with same can be observed $\xi=10$, independently on $P(s)$ for WP squirmers vanishes for cluster sizes, independently of $\beta$ and $r_c$ when $\xi=1$, since the formation of and chains assemble the particles head to head, thus it avoids the polar However, $\xi=10$, polar decays with $s$: for $r_c=1.5\sigma$ weak pullers form clusters with high polar order, while for $r_c=2.5\sigma$ decays faster for pushers than for pullers. In latter case, the WP show another type of alignment, particles a high order the of $\beta=0$ and pushers. During aggregation, we have identified seven different cases depending on whether the attractive patch is oriented the propulsion squirmers) or towards (WP 3 gas states, cases and 1 coarsening. On the squirmers coarsen isotropically if the interaction is strong $\xi \approx When the interaction strength competes with ($\xi =1$), dynamic clusters emerge whose mean size on hydrodynamic stresses. When activity dominates ($\xi =10$), particles form a gas and depending on of $\beta$ this gas be isotropically oriented polarly On other WP squirmers chains of particles if the interaction is high enough ($\xi \approx or a suspension of trimers and tetramers if the interaction the propulsion ($\xi =1$). activity dominates ($\xi =10$), form gas and depending on of this isotropic, or nematically oriented. Therefore, on hand anisotropy drives the formation structures of trimers and the other hand anisotropy modulates the sensitivity of hydrodynamic signature: while WP squirmers are more to $r_c$ when $\xi=10$, AP squirmers
 than for pullers); whereas when $R_c=1.5 \sigma$, $P(s)$ cOrresPonDs tO hIgh pOlar Order for large cLUsteRs with $\beta=0$ and weak pulleRs. The SaME feaTUrEs can Be obserVEd WHEn $\xI=10$, iNdEpeNdENtLy on $r_C$. $P(s)$ For WP sqUirmers vanIshEs For all clusteR SiZes, indepenDenTly of $\beta$ and $R_c$ wHen $\xi=1$, sInCe tHE formAtiOn of tRimers ANd chaiNs assemblE tHE partiCLes head TO HeAd, thUs it avoids the polaR OrDEr. However, when $\xI=10$, the poLaR OrDER deCayS with $s$: for $r_C=1.5\sIgma$ wEAk pulleRS fORM CluSTers with high pOlar order, whILe fOr $r_c=2.5\siGmA$ $P(s)$ DEcays fAster FoR PusHers than for PullErs. In the lAtter cASe, the WP SQuirmerS show aNotHer Type OF aLiGnmEnT, WitH PaRtiCLes With a higH nEmAtic oRder IN THE ranGe oF $\betA=0$ and wEak pushers.

DurIng AggrEGatIon, we Have iDentIfIed seVen difFerenT cAses depending on WhetHer the attRacTiVe pAtCh is oRIented AgaInsT the proPulsion DIreCtION (aP Squirmers) or directeD tOWArDs it (WP sqUirmerS): 3 GaS sTAtes, 3 clusTeRinG casES And 1 coArseNInG. On the onE side, Ap SqUiRmers coArSen isoTrOpiCalLy if tHE intEractiOn is stroNg enoUGh $\xi \approx 0.1$. When THe interaction STrENGtH CompEteS with self-prOpulSIon ($\xI =1$), dynAMiC clUSters EmergE wHOsE Mean size depend on hydRoDynamiC streSses. When activIty dominatES ($\XI =10$), particlEs foRM a GAs and depending On the Value of $\betA$ This gas cAn be iSotropicAlly orienTED or polarLy oRieNteD. On THE oTher side, WP squIRMers FoRm chainS of ParticlEs iF thE inTerAcTion is higH enough ($\xI \aPpRoX 0.1$), oR a sUspenSIon of triMeRs aNd TetRamerS If the iNteraCtioN cOmPEteS with thE AcTIVe prOpUlSion ($\Xi =1$). WHeNever ActiVIty DominatEs ($\xi =10$), partiCleS Form A gAs And depeNding on the valUe Of $\beta$ this GaS caN be isoTROpic, polaR or even nematically orienTEd.

ThereForE, on onE hanD anisotroPy dRives tHe fORmatioN of strUcturEs Of tRIMers aND TeTraMeRs for WP squIRMerS; on thE oTher Hand aniSotropy modulates thE SenSitivity of the HydRodyNAMiC siGNaTUre: WhILe Wp SQuirmers are more Sensitive tO $r_C$ WhEn $\xi=10$, AP squiRMerS
 than for pullers); wherea s when $r_ c=1.5  \s igm a$ , $P (s)$  corresponds t o  hig h polar order for larg e clu st e rs w i th  $\be ta=0$ a n dw e akpu ll ers .T he  same  fe aturescan be obs erv ed  when $\xi=1 0 $,  independe ntl y on $r_c$.$P( s)$ fo rWPs quirm ers  vani shes f o r allcluster s iz e s, ind e pendent l y  o f $\ beta$ and $r_c$ w h en $\xi=1$, since  the f or m at i o n o f t rimers and  c hains assembl e  t h e par t icles head to  head, thus itavoids  t hep olar o rder.  H o wev er, when $\ xi=1 0$, the p olar o r der dec a ys with  $s$:for  $r _c=1 . 5\ si gma $w eak pu lle r s f orm clus te rs  with  hig h p o larord er,while  for $r_c=2.5 \si gma$ $P( s)$ d ecays  fas te r for  pushe rs th an  for pullers. I n th e lattercas e,  th eWP sq u irmers  sh owanother  type o f  al ig n m e nt , with particles w it h ahigh nem atic o r de ri n the ra ng e o f $\ b e ta=0$  and we ak pushe rs.

D u ri ng  aggreg at ion, w ehav e i denti f iedsevendifferen t cas e s depending on whether the a t tr a c ti v e pa tch  is oriente d ag a inst  the pr opu l siondirec ti o n( AP squirmers) or di re cted t oward s it (WP squi rmers): 3g a s  states,  3 c l us t ering cases an d 1 c oarsening. On the o ne si de, AP s quirmersc o arsen is otr opi cal lyi f  t he interactio n is s tr ong eno ugh  $\xi \ app rox  0. 1$.  W hen the i nteracti on  s tr en gth  comp e tes with  s elf -p rop ulsio n  ($\xi  =1$) , dy na mi c  cl usterse me r g e wh os emean  si ze  depe nd o n  hy drodyna mic stres ses .  Whe nac tivitydominates ($\ xi  =10$), pa rt icl es for m a gas an d depending on the valu e  of $\b eta $ thi s ga s can beiso tropic all y  orien ted or  pola rl y o r i ented . On  th eother side , WPsquir me rs f orm cha ins of particles i f  th e interaction  is  hig h en oug h  ( $ \xi  \ a ppr o x  0.1$), or a su spension o ft ri mers and t e tra me rs if t he inte racti o n compe tes withthe activ eprop u l sio n ($\xi =1 $). When ever acti v ity d o mi nates  ($ \xi =1 0$ ),parti cles f o rma gas  and d ep ending  on t he  value o f $\beta$ this gas canbe iso tropi c,polar oreve n  ne matically  ori ented.

Th ere for e, on  on e  hand  ani s ot rop y  driv es t h e formati o nofs t ru ctures of t r i m ers  andtet r amersforWP squirmers; ont he other handanis o t rop y m o dula te s the sensitiv ity  o f the hydr od ynamic sign ature: w hi l e WPsquirm ers ar e mores e ns i tive t o $r _c$  when $\x i=1 0$ ,  AP squ ir me r s
 than_for pullers);_whereas when $r_c=1.5 \sigma$,_$P(s)$ corresponds_to_high polar_order_for large clusters_with $\beta=0$ and_weak pullers. The same_features can be_observed_when $\xi=10$, independently on $r_c$. $P(s)$ for WP squirmers vanishes for all cluster sizes,_independently_of $\beta$_and_$r_c$_when $\xi=1$, since the formation_of trimers and chains assemble_the particles_head to head, thus it avoids the polar_order._However, when $\xi=10$,_the polar order decays with $s$: for $r_c=1.5\sigma$ weak_pullers form clusters with high polar_order, while for_$r_c=2.5\sigma$_$P(s)$_decays faster for pushers_than for pullers. In the latter_case, the WP squirmers show another_type of alignment, with particles with a_high nematic order in the range_of $\beta=0$ and weak pushers.

During_aggregation, we_have identified seven different cases_depending on whether_the attractive_patch is oriented_against the propulsion direction (AP squirmers)_or directed towards_it (WP squirmers): 3 gas states,_3_clustering cases and_1_coarsening._On the_one side, AP_squirmers_coarsen isotropically_if_the interaction is strong enough $\xi_\approx_0.1$. When the interaction strength competes with_self-propulsion ($\xi =1$), dynamic_clusters_emerge whose mean size_depend on hydrodynamic stresses. When_activity dominates ($\xi =10$), particles form_a gas_and depending_on the value of $\beta$ this gas can be isotropically oriented_or polarly oriented. On the other_side, WP squirmers form_chains of_particles_if the interaction_is_high enough_($\xi \approx 0.1$), or a suspension of_trimers and_tetramers if the interaction competes with_the active propulsion ($\xi_=1$)._Whenever activity dominates ($\xi =10$), particles_form a gas and depending on_the value of $\beta$ this_gas_can_be isotropic, polar or even_nematically oriented.

Therefore, on one hand anisotropy_drives the formation_of structures of trimers and tetramers for_WP_squirmers; on the other hand anisotropy_modulates_the sensitivity of the hydrodynamic signature:_while_WP_squirmers are more sensitive to_$r_c$ when $\xi=10$, AP squirmers