_{-\infty}^{+\infty}\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\exp\!\Big[\frac{({\bar{v}}+\alpha\Gamma-y)^2+({\bar{u}}-\alpha\Sigma-y')^2}{-4\eta t}\Big]\tilde{g}_0\;dydy'\;,\nonumber\end{aligned}$$ where

\[eq.11\] $$\begin{aligned}
&\Gamma=k_x\sin(\omega_ct)+k_y\cos(\omega_ct)\;,\\
&\Sigma=k_y\sin(\omega_ct)-k_x\cos(\omega_ct)\;,\\
&\alpha=2i\eta/\omega_c^2\;.\end{aligned}$$

The complete solution must rely on the explicit form of the initial condition $\tilde{g}_0(k_x,k_y,{\bar{u}},{\bar{v}}$). Since we are interested in determining the density threshold for the electron deconfinement, a suitable choice for the initial condition is the density profile corresponding to a quasi-stable configuration of the plasma. This way, we can investigate the proper conditions for which the model exhibits a disruption. In the real space, an example of such an initial profile is shown in Ref.  and can be reasonably approximated with a Gaussian of both space and velocity variables. Thus, the function $\tilde{g}_0$ reads as $$\label{eq.12}
\tilde{g}_0(k_x,k_y,{\bar{u}},{\bar{v}})=\frac{m}{2\pi k_BT}\frac{1}{2\pi \sigma^2}
\;e^{-\frac{m{\bar{u}}^{2}+m{\bar{v}}^{2}}{2 k_B T}-\frac{k_x^2+k_y^2}{2\sigma^2}}\;,$$ where $\sigma$ is the variance in the $k$-space.

The physical phenomena we are going to describe concern the inner part of the confined plasma as shown in Ref. . Therefore, we reasonably set $1/\sigma$ equal to one third of the minor radius of the FTU Tokamak device, [*i.e.,* ]{}$\sigma=8.33$m$^{-1}$. Moreover, being focused on the role played by the plasma density, the temperature is here and in the following considered as a fixed parameter. However, it is
_ { -\infty}^{+\infty}\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\exp\!\Big[\frac{({\bar{v}}+\alpha\Gamma - y)^2+({\bar{u}}-\alpha\Sigma - y')^2}{-4\eta t}\Big]\tilde{g}_0\;dydy'\;,\nonumber\end{aligned}$$ where 

 \[eq.11\ ] $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 & \Gamma = k_x\sin(\omega_ct)+k_y\cos(\omega_ct)\;,\\ 
 & \Sigma = k_y\sin(\omega_ct)-k_x\cos(\omega_ct)\;,\\ 
 & \alpha=2i\eta/\omega_c^2\;.\end{aligned}$$ 

 The complete solution must rely on the explicit form of the initial circumstance $ \tilde{g}_0(k_x, k_y,{\bar{u}},{\bar{v}}$). Since we are concerned in determine the density brink for the electron deconfinement, a desirable choice for the initial condition is the density visibility represent to a quasi - stable shape of the plasma. This direction, we can investigate the proper conditions for which the mannequin exhibits a disruption. In the substantial quad, an example of such an initial profile is shown in Ref.    and can be reasonably approximated with a Gaussian of both outer space and velocity variables. Thus, the routine $ \tilde{g}_0 $ reads as $ $ \label{eq.12 } 
 \tilde{g}_0(k_x, k_y,{\bar{u}},{\bar{v}})=\frac{m}{2\pi k_BT}\frac{1}{2\pi \sigma^2 } 
 \;e^{-\frac{m{\bar{u}}^{2}+m{\bar{v}}^{2}}{2 k_B T}-\frac{k_x^2+k_y^2}{2\sigma^2}}\;,$$ where $ \sigma$ is the variance in the $ k$-space. 

 The physical phenomena we are die to describe concern the inner part of the confined plasma as prove in Ref.  . Therefore, we reasonably set $ 1/\sigma$ equal to one third of the minor spoke of the FTU Tokamak device, [ * i.e., * ] { } $ \sigma=8.33$m$^{-1}$. furthermore, being focus on the role played by the plasma density, the temperature is here and in the following considered as a fixed argument. However, it is
_{-\infhy}^{+\infty}\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\exp\!\Big[\frac{({\bar{v}}+\alpma\Gamma-y)^2+({\bar{u}}-\alphc\Wigma-y')^2}{-4\xta t}\Bif]\tilde{g}_0\;dhdy'\;,\nonumber\end{aligned}$$ where

\[ee.11\] $$\vegin{qligned}
&\Gamma=k_x\sin(\omega_zt)+k_y\cos(\omvga_ct)\;,\\
&\Sigmq=k_y\smn(\omega_ct)-k_x\cos(\omxfa_ct)\;,\\
&\alpmc=2i\eta/\klega_e^2\;.\eid{aligned}$$

The cokplete solgtion must relf un the explicit form of the initial cjnditiom $\hilde{g}_0(k_x,k_y,{\bar{u}},{\far{v}}$). Fincs we are interested in determining the deisity threshold for the electron deconfinfmenh, a suitable choicf for the ibitiwo condition ks the density profile corresponding to a quasi-stable confnguration od rhe klasma. This xay, we can investinste tha propet conditions fpr xhicy the model exhibits e disruption. In the teal space, au example of such an unutial proxile us rhosn ih Ref.  wnd can be rezsonably approximated with a Gsufwian of both apace wnq velocity variables. Thus, the function $\uilde{f}_0$ reads as $$\label{eq.12}
\tilde{t}_0(k_x,k_y,{\bar{u}},{\bar{v}})=\frac{m}{2\pi n_BT}\frac{1}{2\pi \sigma^2}
\;e^{-\frac{m{\bar{u}}^{2}+m{\bar{v}}^{2}}{2 k_B T}-\frac{k_x^2+k_y^2}{2\sigma^2}}\;,$$ where $\sigka$ is ghe vwfuajce in the $k$-space.

The physical phenomena we arq gpikg to describe cjncern the onjet part of the zonfinzs llasma as shown in Ref. . Thgreforw, we reasjnabky set $1/\sigma$ equal to one tyird of the iunor radius of the FTU Tokamay defice, [*o.e.,* ]{}$\sigma=8.33$m$^{-1}$. Moreover, beiny focuaed on the gole playsa by the plasma aenxidy, the ttoperature is here and in tie foklowing conxidereq as a fixfd pavdmeter. However, it ls
_{-\infty}^{+\infty}\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\exp\!\Big[\frac{({\bar{v}}+\alpha\Gamma-y)^2+({\bar{u}}-\alpha\Sigma-y')^2}{-4\eta t}\Big]\tilde{g}_0\;dydy'\;,\nonumber\end{aligned}$$ where \[eq.11\] $$\begin{aligned} &\Gamma=k_x\sin(\omega_ct)+k_y\cos(\omega_ct)\;,\\ &\Sigma=k_y\sin(\omega_ct)-k_x\cos(\omega_ct)\;,\\ complete must rely the explicit form Since are interested in the density threshold the electron deconfinement, a suitable choice the initial condition is the density profile corresponding to a quasi-stable configuration of plasma. This way, we can investigate the proper conditions for which the model a In real an example of such an initial profile is shown in Ref. and can be reasonably approximated a Gaussian of both space and velocity variables. the function $\tilde{g}_0$ reads $$\label{eq.12} \tilde{g}_0(k_x,k_y,{\bar{u}},{\bar{v}})=\frac{m}{2\pi k_BT}\frac{1}{2\pi \sigma^2} \;e^{-\frac{m{\bar{u}}^{2}+m{\bar{v}}^{2}}{2 T}-\frac{k_x^2+k_y^2}{2\sigma^2}}\;,$$ $\sigma$ is variance the The physical phenomena are going to describe concern the inner part of the confined plasma as shown in Ref. . we reasonably equal to third the radius of the device, [*i.e.,* ]{}$\sigma=8.33$m$^{-1}$. Moreover, being focused played by the plasma density, the temperature is and in following considered as a fixed parameter. it is
_{-\infty}^{+\infty}\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\exp\!\Big[\frac{({\bar{v}}+\aLpha\Gamma-y)^2+({\Bar{u}}-\aLphA\SiGmA-y')^2}{-4\etA t}\BiG]\tilde{g}_0\;dydy'\;,\nonUMber\End{aligned}$$ where

\[eq.11\] $$\begin{AlignEd}
&\gAmma=K_X\sIn(\omeGa_ct)+k_y\cOS(\oMEGa_cT)\;,\\
&\SIgMa=k_Y\sIN(\oMega_cT)-k_x\Cos(\omegA_ct)\;,\\
&\alpha=2i\eTa/\oMeGa_c^2\;.\end{aligneD}$$

thE complete sOluTion must rely On tHe explIcIt fORm of tHe iNitiaL condiTIon $\tilDe{g}_0(k_x,k_y,{\baR{u}},{\BAr{v}}$). SinCE we are iNTErEsteD in determining the DEnSIty threshold foR the elEcTRoN DEcoNfiNement, a suiTaBle chOIce for tHE iNITIal COndition is the Density profILe cOrrespOnDinG To a quaSi-staBlE ConFiguration oF the Plasma. ThiS way, we CAn invesTIgate thE propeR coNdiTionS FoR wHicH tHE moDEl ExhIBitS a disrupTiOn. in the Real SPACE, an eXamPle oF such An initial profIle Is shOWn iN Ref.  aNd can Be reAsOnablY approXimatEd With a Gaussian of Both Space and vEloCiTy vArIableS. thus, thE fuNctIon $\tildE{g}_0$ reads AS $$\laBeL{EQ.12}
\TiLde{g}_0(k_x,k_y,{\bar{u}},{\bar{v}})=\frAc{M}{2\PI k_bT}\frac{1}{2\pi \Sigma^2}
\;e^{-\FRaC{m{\BAr{u}}^{2}+m{\bar{v}}^{2}}{2 K_B t}-\frAc{k_x^2+K_Y^2}{2\Sigma^2}}\;,$$ WherE $\SiGma$ is the VarianCE iN tHe $k$-spacE.

THe physIcAl pHenOmena WE are Going tO describE concERn the inner part OF the confined pLAsMA As SHown In REf. . Therefore, We reASonaBly sET $1/\sIgmA$ Equal To one ThIRd OF the minor radius of thE FtU TokaMak deVice, [*i.e.,* ]{}$\sigma=8.33$m$^{-1}$. MOreover, beiNG FOcused on The rOLe PLayed by the plasMa denSity, the temPErature iS here And in the Following CONsidered As a FixEd pAraMETeR. However, it is
_{-\infty}^{+\infty}\!\!\! \!\!\!\!\e xp\!\ Big [\f ra c{({ \bar {v}}+\alpha\Ga m ma-y )^2+({\bar{u}}-\alpha\ Sigma -y ' )^2} { -4 \etat}\Big] \ ti l d e{g }_ 0\ ;dy dy ' \; ,\non umb er\end{ aligned}$$  wh er e

\[eq.11\] $$ \begin{ali gne d}
&\Gamma=k _x\ sin(\o me ga_ c t)+k_ y\c os(\o mega_c t )\;,\\ 
&\Sigma= k_ y \sin(\ o mega_ct ) - k_ x\co s(\omega_ct)\;,\\ &\ a lpha=2i\eta/\o mega_c ^2 \ ;. \ e nd{ ali gned}$$

T he  comp l ete sol u ti o n mus t  rely on theexplicit fo r m o f thein iti a l cond ition  $ \ til de{g}_0(k_x ,k_y ,{\bar{u} },{\ba r {v}}$). Since w e areint ere sted in  d ete rm i nin g  t hed ens ity thre sh ol d for  the e l e ctro n d econ finem ent, a suitab lechoi c e f or th e ini tial  c ondit ion is  thede nsity profile c orre spondingtoaqua si -stab l e conf igu rat ion ofthe pla s ma.  T h i s  w ay, we can investi ga t e  t he prope r cond i ti on s  for whi ch  th e mo d e l exh ibit s  a  disrupt ion. I n  t he  real s pa ce, an  e xam ple  of s u ch a n init ial prof ile i s  shown in Ref.  and can be r e as o n ab l y ap pro ximated wit h aG auss iano fbot h  spac e and  v e lo c ity variables. Thus ,the fu nctio n $\tilde{g}_ 0$ reads a s $ $\label{ eq.1 2 }\ tilde{g}_0(k_x ,k_y, {\bar{u}}, { \bar{v}} )=\fr ac{m}{2\ pi k_BT}\ f r ac{1}{2\ pi\si gma ^2} \ ;e ^{-\frac{m{\b a r {u}} ^{ 2}+m{\b ar{ v}}^{2} }{2  k_ B T }-\ fr ac{k_x^2+ k_y^2}{2 \s ig ma ^2 }}\ ;,$$w here $\s ig ma$  i s t he va r iancein th e $k $- sp a ce. 

The p h ys i c al p he no mena  we  a re go ingt o d escribe  concernthe inne rpa rt of t he confined p la sma as sho wn  in  Ref.. Therefor e, we reasonably set $1 / \sigma$  eq ual t o on e third o f t he min orr adiusof the  FTUTo kam a k  devi c e ,[*i .e .,* ]{}$\s i g ma= 8.33$ m$ ^{-1 }$. Mor eover, being focus e d o n the role pl aye d by t he  pl a sm a  de ns i ty, t he temperatureis here an di nthe follow i ngco nsidere d as afixed paramet er. Howev er, it is 
_{-\infty}^{+\infty}\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\exp\!\Big[\frac{({\bar{v}}+\alpha\Gamma-y)^2+({\bar{u}}-\alpha\Sigma-y')^2}{-4\eta t}\Big]\tilde{g}_0\;dydy'\;,\nonumber\end{aligned}$$_where

\[eq.11\] $$\begin{aligned}
&\Gamma=k_x\sin(\omega_ct)+k_y\cos(\omega_ct)\;,\\
&\Sigma=k_y\sin(\omega_ct)-k_x\cos(\omega_ct)\;,\\
&\alpha=2i\eta/\omega_c^2\;.\end{aligned}$$

The_complete solution must rely_on the_explicit_form of_the_initial condition $\tilde{g}_0(k_x,k_y,{\bar{u}},{\bar{v}}$)._Since we are_interested in determining the_density threshold for_the_electron deconfinement, a suitable choice for the initial condition is the density profile corresponding_to_a quasi-stable_configuration_of_the plasma. This way, we_can investigate the proper conditions_for which_the model exhibits a disruption. In the real_space,_an example of_such an initial profile is shown in Ref.  and_can be reasonably approximated with a_Gaussian of both_space_and_velocity variables. Thus, the_function $\tilde{g}_0$ reads as $$\label{eq.12}
\tilde{g}_0(k_x,k_y,{\bar{u}},{\bar{v}})=\frac{m}{2\pi k_BT}\frac{1}{2\pi_\sigma^2}
\;e^{-\frac{m{\bar{u}}^{2}+m{\bar{v}}^{2}}{2 k_B T}-\frac{k_x^2+k_y^2}{2\sigma^2}}\;,$$ where $\sigma$ is_the variance in the $k$-space.

The physical phenomena_we are going to describe concern_the inner part of the_confined plasma_as shown in Ref. . Therefore,_we reasonably set_$1/\sigma$ equal_to one third_of the minor radius of the_FTU Tokamak device,_[*i.e.,* ]{}$\sigma=8.33$m$^{-1}$. Moreover, being focused on_the_role played by_the_plasma_density, the_temperature is here_and_in the_following_considered as a fixed parameter. However,_it_is