 Spurious Correlations
=======================================

There are enormous differences in the size of academic journals, and these differences swamp the patterns that Davis was seeking in his analysis. The JCR indexes journals that range in size from tiny (*Astronomy and Astrophysics Review* has published 13 articles over the previous five years) to huge (*The Journal of Biological Chemistry* has published 31,045 articles over the same period) with a coefficient of variation, $c_v$, equal to 1.910. Per-article citation intensity varies less, whether measured by Article Influence or by Impact Factor (AI: range 0–27.5, coefficient of variation$=1.785$; IF: range 0–63.3, coefficient of variation$=1.548$).

We can formalize these observations by decomposing Davis’ regression of Eigenfactor on Total Citations. Davis regresses

 Log($EF_i$) Log($CT_i$),

where $EF_i$ is the Eigenfactor score for journal $i$ and $CT_i$ is the Total Citations received by journal $i$. We let $AI_i$ be the Article Influence for journal $i$, and $N_{i,5}$ is the total number of articles published over the last five years for journal $i$. Then by definition

$$\begin{aligned}
\log(EF_i)& = & \log(c_1 \times AI_i \times N_{i,5}) \nonumber  \\
&=& \log c_1 + \log AI_i + \log N_{i,5}, \nonumber \end{aligned}$$

where $c_1$ is a scaling constant that normalizes the Article Influence scores so that the mean article in the JCR has an Article Influence score of 1.00. Similarly, letting $IF_i$ be the Impact Factor for journal $i$,

$$\begin{aligned}
\log(CT_i)&\approx& \log(c_2 \times IF_i \times N_{i,2}) \nonumber \\
&\approx& \log(c_2\, c_3 \times IF_i \times N_{i,5}) \nonumber \\
&=&\log c_2 \,c_3 + \log IF_i + \log N_{i,5} \nonumber\end{aligned}$$

where $c_2$ and $c
Spurious Correlations 
 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 

 There are enormous differences in the size of academic journals, and these differences deluge the design that Davis was seeking in his analysis. The JCR index journal that range in size from tiny (* Astronomy and Astrophysics Review * has print 13 articles over the previous five old age) to huge (* The Journal of Biological Chemistry * has published 31,045 articles over the like period) with a coefficient of variation, $ c_v$, equal to 1.910. Per - article citation volume varies less, whether measured by Article Influence or by Impact Factor (AI: range 0–27.5, coefficient of variation$=1.785 $; IF: range 0–63.3, coefficient of variation$=1.548 $). 

 We can formalize these observations by decompose Davis ’ regression of Eigenfactor on Total Citations. Davis regresses 

  Log($EF_i$) Log($CT_i$), 

 where $ EF_i$ is the Eigenfactor score for daybook $ i$ and $ CT_i$ is the Total Citations received by journal $ i$. We let $ AI_i$ be the Article Influence for journal $ i$, and $ N_{i,5}$ is the entire number of articles published over the last five years for diary $ i$. Then by definition 

 $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 \log(EF_i) & = & \log(c_1 \times AI_i \times N_{i,5 }) \nonumber   \\ 
 & = & \log c_1 + \log AI_i + \log N_{i,5 }, \nonumber \end{aligned}$$ 

 where $ c_1 $ is a scaling constant that normalizes the Article Influence scores so that the mean article in the JCR has an Article Influence score of 1.00. Similarly, letting $ IF_i$ be the Impact Factor for journal $ i$, 

 $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 \log(CT_i)&\approx & \log(c_2 \times IF_i \times N_{i,2 }) \nonumber \\ 
 & \approx & \log(c_2\, c_3 \times IF_i \times N_{i,5 }) \nonumber \\ 
 & = & \log c_2 \,c_3 + \log IF_i + \log N_{i,5 } \nonumber\end{aligned}$$ 

 where $ c_2 $ and $ c
 Spkrious Correlations
=======================================

There are enormous dndferenres in fhe size of academic journals, and thxse eiffeeences swamp the pattefns that Favis waw setking in his analbais. The JCR ihfexev journals that range in vize from tiny (*Artxonomy and Astrophysics Review* has ptblishec 13 articles over the [revjous five years) to huge (*The Journam of Bimlogical Chemostry* has published 31,045 articpes lver the same perild) with a cieffyxient of varkation, $c_v$, tqbal to 1.910. Per-zrticle citation intensity varids lexs, whether mwaskted by Articoe Insluence or bn Impacd Factot (AI: range 0–27.5, cocfficment of variation$=1.785$; IF: rangx 0–63.3, coefficient of vatiation$=1.548$).

We wau formalize these obswrcatiots bf dezimpusihg Dzvis’ rfgrxssion of Ejgenfactor in Total Citations. Cadpx regresses

 Lkg($EF_i$) Jod($CT_i$),

where $EF_i$ is the Eigenfactor score xor journal $i$ and $CT_i$ is tye Total Citations refeived by journal $i$. We let $AI_i$ be the Article Influence fos joucnxl $n$, and $V_{u,5}$ ls the total number of articles published ovew tne last five yeavs for journal $i$. Tnej ni definition

$$\beein{aliyhes}
\log(EF_i)& = & \log(c_1 \timfs AI_i \jimes B_{i,5}) \nonumbtr  \\
&=& \kog c_1 + \log AI_i + \log N_{i,5}, \nonunber \end{aligued}$$

qhere $c_1$ is a scaliug constant chat nprmalozes the Article Influeuce sckres so thah the meah article in the GCR hds an Arukcle Influence scjre of 1.00. Smmilaxly, lettkng $OF_i$ be the Impach Facbmr for journal $i$,

$$\behin{alngned}
\nog(CT_i)&\apprlx& \log(c_2 \times IF_i \times N_{i,2}) \nonumber \\
&\approx& \lob(c_2\, c_3 \nimes IF_i \timex N_{i,5}) \nonumber \\
&=&\log c_2 \,c_3 + \log NF_i + \log N_{i,5} \nunumber\end{zligned}$$

xhere $c_2$ and $s
Spurious Correlations ======================================= There are enormous differences size academic journals, these differences swamp seeking his analysis. The indexes journals that in size from tiny (*Astronomy and Review* has published 13 articles over the previous five years) to huge (*The of Biological Chemistry* has published 31,045 articles over the same period) with a of $c_v$, to Per-article citation intensity varies less, whether measured by Article Influence or by Impact Factor (AI: range coefficient of variation$=1.785$; IF: range 0–63.3, coefficient of We can formalize these by decomposing Davis’ regression of on Citations. Davis Log($EF_i$) where is the Eigenfactor for journal $i$ and $CT_i$ is the Total Citations received by journal $i$. We let $AI_i$ be Article Influence $i$, and is total of articles published last five years for journal $i$. $$\begin{aligned} \log(EF_i)& = & \log(c_1 \times AI_i \times \nonumber \\ \log c_1 + \log AI_i + N_{i,5}, \nonumber \end{aligned}$$ where $c_1$ is a scaling that normalizes the Article Influence scores so that the mean article in the JCR has Influence score of 1.00. letting $IF_i$ be Impact for $i$, \log(CT_i)&\approx& \log(c_2 IF_i \times N_{i,2}) \nonumber \\ &\approx& \log(c_2\, c_3 \times IF_i \times \nonumber \\ &=&\log c_2 \,c_3 + \log IF_i + \log where and $c
 Spurious Correlations
=======================================

There Are enormouS diffEreNceS iN the Size Of academic jourNAls, aNd these differences swamP the pAtTErns THaT DaviS was seeKInG IN hiS aNaLysIs. tHe jCR inDexEs journAls that ranGe iN sIze from tiny (*ASTrOnomy and AsTroPhysics RevieW* haS publiShEd 13 aRTicleS ovEr the PrevioUS five yEars) to hugE (*THE JournAL of BiolOGIcAl ChEmistry* has publishED 31,045 aRTicles over the sAme perIoD) WiTH A coEffIcient of vaRiAtion, $C_V$, equal tO 1.910. peR-ARTicLE citation inteNsity varies LEss, WhetheR mEasURed by ARticlE INFluEnce or by ImpAct FActor (AI: raNge 0–27.5, coeFFicient OF variatIon$=1.785$; IF: rAngE 0–63.3, coEffiCIeNt Of vArIAtiON$=1.548$).

WE caN ForMalize thEsE oBservAtioNS BY DecoMpoSing davis’ Regression of EIgeNfacTOr oN TotaL CitaTionS. DAvis rEgressEs

 Log($eF_I$) Log($CT_i$),

where $EF_i$ Is thE EigenfacTor ScOre FoR jourNAl $i$ and $cT_i$ Is tHe Total citatioNS reCeIVED bY journal $i$. We let $AI_i$ bE tHE arTicle InfLuence FOr JoURnal $i$, and $n_{i,5}$ Is tHe toTAL numbEr of ARtIcles pubLished OVeR tHe last fIvE years FoR joUrnAl $i$. ThEN by dEfinitIon

$$\begin{AlignED}
\log(EF_i)& = & \log(c_1 \timES AI_i \times N_{i,5}) \noNUmBER  \\
&=& \lOG c_1 + \loG AI_I + \log N_{i,5}, \nonumBer \eND{aliGned}$$

WHeRe $c_1$ IS a scaLing cOnSTaNT that normalizes the ARtIcle InFluenCe scores so thaT the mean arTICLe in the JcR haS An aRticle InfluencE scorE of 1.00. SimilarLY, letting $iF_i$ be The ImpacT Factor foR JOurnal $i$,

$$\bEgiN{alIgnEd}
\lOG(cT_I)&\approx& \log(c_2 \tiMES IF_i \TiMes N_{i,2}) \noNumBer \\
&\apprOx& \lOg(c_2\, C_3 \tiMes iF_I \times N_{i,5}) \nOnumber \\
&=&\lOg C_2 \,c_3 + \LoG If_i + \lOg N_{i,5} \nONumber\enD{aLigNeD}$$

whEre $c_2$ aND $c
 Spurious Correlations
=== ========== ===== === === == ==== ==== =====

There a r e en ormous differences inthe s iz e  ofa ca demic  journa l s, a ndth es e d if f er ences  sw amp the  patternstha tDavis was se e ki ng in hisana lysis. The J CRindexe sjou r nalstha t ran ge ins ize fr om tiny ( *A s tronom y  and As t r op hysi cs Review* has pu b li s hed 13 article s over  t h ep r evi ous  five year s)  to h u ge (*Th e  J o u r nal of Biological  Chemistry* has  publi sh ed3 1,045artic le s  ov er the same  per iod) with  a coe f ficient of vari ation,  $c _v$ , eq u al  t o 1 .9 1 0.P er -ar t icl e citati on  i ntens ityv a r i es l ess , wh ether  measured byArt icle Inf luenc e orby I mp act F actor(AI:ra nge 0–27.5, coe ffic ient of v ari at ion $= 1.785 $ ; IF:ran ge0–63.3,  coeffi c ien to f va riation$=1.548$).
W e ca n formal ize th e se  o b servatio ns  by  dec o m posin g Da v is ’ regres sion o f  E ig enfacto ron Tot al  Ci tat ions. Davi s regr esses

Log($ E F_i$) Log($CT_ i $),

where $E F _i $ is theEig enfactor sc oref or j ourn a l$i$ and $ CT_i$  i s  t h e Total Citations r ec eivedby jo urnal $i$. We  let $AI_i $ b e the Ar ticl e  I n fluence for jo urnal  $i$, and$ N_{i,5}$  is t he total  number o f articles  pu bli she d o v e rthe last five y ears  f or jour nal  $i$. T hen  by  de fin it ion

$$\b egin{ali gn ed }\l og( EF_i) &  = & \lo g( c_1  \ tim es AI _ i \tim es N_ {i,5 })  \ n onu mber  \ \ 
& = &  \lo gc_ 1 +\lo gAI_i+ \l o g N _{i,5},  \nonumbe r \ e nd{a li gn ed}$$
where $c_1$ i sa scalingco nst ant th a t  normali zes the Article Influen c e score s s o tha t th e mean ar tic le inthe JCR ha s an A rticl eInf l u ences c or e o f1.00. Simi l a rly , let ti ng $ IF_i$ b e the Impact Facto r  fo r journal $i$ ,
$$\b e g in {al i gn e d}\l o g(C T _ i)&\approx& \lo g(c_2 \tim es IF _i \timesN _{i ,2 }) \non umber \ \
&\a p prox& \ log(c_2\,  c_3 \tim es  IF_ i \ti mes N_{i,5 }) \nonu mber \\
& = &\log c_ 2 \,c _3+ \log  I F_i  + \l og N_{ i ,5}  \non umber\ en d{alig ned}$ $
where $ c_2$ and $c
 Spurious_Correlations
=======================================

There are_enormous differences in the_size of_academic_journals, and_these_differences swamp the_patterns that Davis_was seeking in his_analysis. The JCR_indexes_journals that range in size from tiny (*Astronomy and Astrophysics Review* has published 13_articles_over the_previous_five_years) to huge (*The Journal_of Biological Chemistry* has published_31,045 articles_over the same period) with a coefficient of_variation,_$c_v$, equal to_1.910. Per-article citation intensity varies less, whether measured by_Article Influence or by Impact Factor_(AI: range 0–27.5,_coefficient_of_variation$=1.785$; IF: range 0–63.3,_coefficient of variation$=1.548$).

We can formalize these_observations by decomposing Davis’ regression of_Eigenfactor on Total Citations. Davis regresses

 Log($EF_i$) Log($CT_i$),

where_$EF_i$ is the Eigenfactor score for_journal $i$ and $CT_i$ is_the Total_Citations received by journal $i$._We let $AI_i$_be the_Article Influence for_journal $i$, and $N_{i,5}$ is the_total number of_articles published over the last five_years_for journal $i$._Then_by_definition

$$\begin{aligned}
\log(EF_i)& =_& \log(c_1 \times_AI_i_\times N_{i,5})_\nonumber_ \\
&=& \log c_1 + \log_AI_i_+ \log N_{i,5}, \nonumber \end{aligned}$$

where $c_1$ is_a scaling constant that_normalizes_the Article Influence scores_so that the mean article_in the JCR has an Article_Influence score_of 1.00._Similarly, letting $IF_i$ be the Impact Factor for journal $i$,

$$\begin{aligned}
\log(CT_i)&\approx& \log(c_2_\times IF_i \times N_{i,2}) \nonumber \\
&\approx&_\log(c_2\, c_3 \times IF_i_\times N_{i,5})_\nonumber_\\
&=&\log c_2 \,c_3_+_\log IF_i_+ \log N_{i,5} \nonumber\end{aligned}$$

where $c_2$ and $c