 is always smaller than the lowest energy gap, $p_{0,1}$. Once $eB$ becomes bigger than the squared system-size inverse (that is, $\alpha\gtrsim 10$ from Fig. \[fig:p01\]), however, the energy gap is significantly reduced and the anomalous coupling between the magnetic field and the rotation is then manifested [@Chen:2015hfc; @Hattori:2016njk].

Integration Measure and Reweighted wave functions {#sec:measure}
=================================================

Because the radial momenta are discretized, we replace the transverse momentum integration with the sums over the quantum numbers, $l$ and $k$, i.e. $$\int \frac{dp_xdp_y}{(2\pi)^2}
  \longrightarrow \frac{1}{\pi R^2} \sum_{l=-\infty}^\infty \sum_{k=1}^\infty 
  \frac{1}{{N_{l,k}}^2}\;,
  \label{eq:phase-space}$$ where ${N_{l,k}}$ represents a weight factor which corresponds to the integration measure in finite-size systems. In the $B=0$ case, as discussed in Ref. [@Ebihara:2016fwa], the weight factor is deduced from the Bessel-Fourier expansion, that is, we know that in the limit of $\alpha\to 0$, $$\begin{split}
  \label{eq:Nlkzero}
  {N_{l,k}}^2 \;\;\longrightarrow & \;\;
  \frac{2}{R^2}\int_0^R r dr\, \bigl[J_l(p_{l,k}r)\bigr]^2 
   \end{split}$$ with the discretized momentum ${p_{l,k}}$ in Eq. . From the relation in Eq. , we extrapolate the above identification to nonzero $\alpha$ as $$\label{eq:Nlk}
  \begin{split}
  {N_{l,k}}^2 &= \frac{2}{R^2}\int_0^R r dr\,
  \bigl[\Phi_l({\lambda_{l,k}},\tfrac{1}{2}eBr^2)\bigr]^2 \\
  &= \int_0^1 dx\, \bigl[
  \Phi_l({\lambda_{l,k}},\alpha x
is always smaller than the lowest energy break, $ p_{0,1}$. Once $ eB$ become bigger than the squared system - size inverse (that is, $ \alpha\gtrsim 10 $ from Fig.   \[fig: p01\ ]), however, the energy col is significantly reduced and the anomalous yoke between the magnetic field and the rotation is then manifested   [ @Chen:2015hfc; @Hattori:2016njk ]. 

 Integration Measure and Reweighted wave function { # sec: measure } 
 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 

 Because the radial momenta are discretized, we substitute the transverse momentum integration with the union over the quantum issue, $ l$ and $ k$, i.e. $ $ \int \frac{dp_xdp_y}{(2\pi)^2 } 
   \longrightarrow \frac{1}{\pi R^2 } \sum_{l=-\infty}^\infty \sum_{k=1}^\infty 
   \frac{1}{{N_{l, k}}^2}\; , 
   \label{eq: phase - space}$$ where $ { N_{l, k}}$ represents a weight factor which corresponds to the integration bill in finite - size systems. In the $ B=0 $ case, as discussed in Ref.   [ @Ebihara:2016fwa ], the weight unit factor is deduced from the Bessel - Fourier expansion, that is, we know that in the limit of $ \alpha\to 0 $, $ $ \begin{split } 
   \label{eq: Nlkzero } 
   { N_{l, k}}^2 \;\;\longrightarrow & \;\; 
   \frac{2}{R^2}\int_0^R roentgen dr\, \bigl[J_l(p_{l, k}r)\bigr]^2 
    \end{split}$$ with the discretized momentum $ { p_{l, k}}$ in Eq.  . From the relation in Eq.  , we extrapolate the above identification to nonzero $ \alpha$ as $ $ \label{eq: Nlk } 
   \begin{split } 
   { N_{l, k}}^2 & = \frac{2}{R^2}\int_0^R r dr\, 
   \bigl[\Phi_l({\lambda_{l, k}},\tfrac{1}{2}eBr^2)\bigr]^2 \\ 
   & = \int_0 ^ 1 dx\, \bigl [ 
   \Phi_l({\lambda_{l, k}},\alpha x
 is always smaller than the lowest energy yqp, $p_{0,1}$. Oice $eB$ gecomes cigger than the squared systxm-size incerse (that is, $\alpha\gtrrim 10$ from Fig. \[fig:p01\]), howtver, the energy gel is sinuificzktly xevuced and the akomalous cogpling between tfe magnetic field and the rotation is then msnlfested [@Chen:2015hfc; @Hatuory:2016njk].

Jntegration Measure and Reweighted wave flnctions {#sec:measute}
=================================================

Because the radial momenha age discretized, we geplace the tragwverse momengum integration with tge sums over the quantum numberr, $l$ aud $k$, i.e. $$\int \feac{fk_xdp_y}{(2\pi)^2}
  \lonjrightwrrow \frac{1}{\pi R^2} \sum_{l=-\itfty}^\infyy \sum_{k=1}^\infty 
  \frec{1}{{N_{l,j}}^2}\;,
  \label{eq:phase-space}$$ xhere ${N_{l,k}}$ represents a weight fcctor which correspones to tve ittegfqtiun jeesude in vinmte-size sysfems. In the $B=0$ case, as discussec yb Ref. [@Ebihara:2016fsa], the wqight factor is deduced from the Bessel-Xoudier expansion, that is, qe know that in the llmit of $\ajpha\to 0$, $$\begin{split}
  \label{eq:Nlkzero}
  {N_{l,k}}^2 \;\;\longrightdrrow & \;\;
  \yvwz{2}{E^2}\ijt_0^R r dr\, \bigl[J_l(p_{l,k}r)\bigr]^2 
   \end{split}$$ with the qjsvrvtized momentum ${p_{j,k}}$ in Eq. . Frpm tng relation in Gq. , we erfrzpolate the above ldentifycatiin to noneero $\slpha$ as $$\label{eq:Nlk}
  \begin{split}
  {N_{l,k}}^2 &= \fgac{2}{R^2}\unt_0^R r dr\,
  \bigl[\Phi_p({\lambda_{l,k}},\tfxac{1}{2}eBr^2)\nigr]^2 \\
  &= \int_0^1 dx\, \bigl[
  \Phi_l({\lamyda_{l,k}},\ampha x
is always smaller than the lowest energy Once becomes bigger the squared system-size from \[fig:p01\]), however, the gap is significantly and the anomalous coupling between the field and the rotation is then manifested [@Chen:2015hfc; @Hattori:2016njk]. Integration Measure and Reweighted functions {#sec:measure} ================================================= Because the radial momenta are discretized, we replace the transverse integration the over quantum numbers, $l$ and $k$, i.e. $$\int \frac{dp_xdp_y}{(2\pi)^2} \longrightarrow \frac{1}{\pi R^2} \sum_{l=-\infty}^\infty \sum_{k=1}^\infty \frac{1}{{N_{l,k}}^2}\;, \label{eq:phase-space}$$ where represents a weight factor which corresponds to the measure in finite-size systems. the $B=0$ case, as discussed Ref. the weight is from Bessel-Fourier expansion, that we know that in the limit of $\alpha\to 0$, $$\begin{split} \label{eq:Nlkzero} {N_{l,k}}^2 \;\;\longrightarrow & \;\; \frac{2}{R^2}\int_0^R r \bigl[J_l(p_{l,k}r)\bigr]^2 \end{split}$$ discretized momentum in . the relation in we extrapolate the above identification to $$\label{eq:Nlk} \begin{split} {N_{l,k}}^2 &= \frac{2}{R^2}\int_0^R r dr\, \bigl[\Phi_l({\lambda_{l,k}},\tfrac{1}{2}eBr^2)\bigr]^2 &= \int_0^1 \bigl[ \Phi_l({\lambda_{l,k}},\alpha x
 is always smaller than the lowEst energy gAp, $p_{0,1}$. OnCe $eb$ beCoMes bIggeR than the squareD SystEm-size inverse (that is, $\alpHa\gtrSiM 10$ From fIg. \[Fig:p01\]), hOwever, tHE eNERgy GaP iS siGnIFiCantlY reDuced anD the anomalOus CoUpling betweeN ThE magnetic fIelD and the rotatIon Is then MaNifESted [@CHen:2015Hfc; @HaTtori:2016nJK].

IntegRation MeaSuRE and ReWEighted WAVe FuncTions {#sec:measure}
=================================================

BeCAuSE the radial momeNta are DiSCrETIzeD, we Replace the TrAnsveRSe momenTUm INTEgrATion with the suMs over the quANtuM numbeRs, $L$ anD $K$, i.e. $$\int \Frac{dP_xDP_y}{(2\pI)^2}
  \longrightaRrow \Frac{1}{\pi R^2} \suM_{l=-\inftY}^\Infty \suM_{K=1}^\infty 
  \fRac{1}{{N_{l,k}}^2}\;,
  \LabEl{eQ:phaSE-sPaCe}$$ wHeRE ${N_{l,K}}$ RePreSEntS a weight FaCtOr whiCh coRRESPondS to The iNtegrAtion measure iN fiNite-SIze SysteMs. In tHe $B=0$ cAsE, as diScusseD in ReF. [@EBihara:2016fwa], the weiGht fActor is deDucEd FroM tHe BesSEl-FourIer ExpAnsion, tHat is, we KNow ThAT IN tHe limit of $\alpha\to 0$, $$\beGiN{SPlIt}
  \label{eQ:NlkzeRO}
  {N_{L,k}}^2 \;\;\LOngrightArRow & \;\;
  \Frac{2}{r^2}\INt_0^R r dR\, \bigL[j_l(P_{l,k}r)\bigr]^2 
   \End{splIT}$$ wItH the disCrEtized MoMenTum ${P_{l,k}}$ in eQ. . FroM the reLation in eq. , we eXTrapolate the abOVe identificatIOn TO NoNZero $\AlpHa$ as $$\label{eq:nlk}
  \bEGin{sPlit}
  {n_{L,k}}^2 &= \FraC{2}{r^2}\int_0^R R dr\,
  \biGl[\pHi_L({\Lambda_{l,k}},\tfrac{1}{2}eBr^2)\bigR]^2 \\
  &= \iNt_0^1 dx\, \biGl[
  \Phi_L({\lambda_{l,k}},\alphA x
 is always smaller than th e lowest e nergy  ga p,$p _{0, 1}$.  Once $eB$ bec o mesbigger than the square d sys te m -siz e  i nvers e (that is , $\a lp ha \gt rs i m10$ f rom  Fig. \ [fig:p01\] ),ho wever, the e n er gy gap issig nificantly r edu ced an dthe anoma lou s cou plingb etween  the magn et i c fiel d  and th e ro tati on is then manife s te d  [@Chen:2015hf c; @Ha tt o ri : 2 016 njk ].

Integr at ion M e asure a n dR e w eig h ted wave func tions {#sec : mea sure}== === = ====== ===== == = === =========== ==== ========= ==

Be c ause th e  radial  momen taare  dis c re ti zed ,w e r e pl ace the  transve rs emomen tumi n t e grat ion  wit h the  sums over th e q uant u m n umber s, $l $ an d$k$,i.e. $ $\int  \ frac{dp_xdp_y}{ (2\p i)^2}
  \ lon gr igh ta rrow\ frac{1 }{\ piR^2} \s um_{l=- \ inf ty } ^ \ in fty \sum_{k=1}^\in ft y 
 \frac{1 }{{N_{ l ,k }} ^ 2}\;,
 \l abe l{eq : p hase- spac e }$ $ where${N_{l , k} }$  repres en ts a w ei ght  fa ctorw hich  corre sponds t o the integration me a sure in finit e -s i z es yste ms.  In the $B= 0$ c a se,as d i sc uss e d inRef.[@ E bi h ara:2016fwa], the w ei ght fa ctoris deduced fr om the Bes s e l -Fourier  exp a ns i on, that is, w e kno w that int he limit  of $ \alpha\t o 0$, $$\ b e gin{spli t}  \ lab el{ e q :N lkzero}
  {N_ { l ,k}} ^2  \;\;\l ong rightar row  &\;\ ;
 \ frac{2}{R ^2}\int_ 0^ Rrdr \,\bigl [ J_l(p_{l ,k }r) \b igr ]^2   \end {spli t}$$  w it h  th e discr e ti z e d mo me nt um $ {p_ {l ,k}}$  inE q.. Fromthe relat ion in E q.  ,  we ext rapolate theab ove identi fi cat ion to n onzero $ \alpha$ as $$\label{eq: N lk}
  \ beg in{sp lit} 
  {N_{l, k}} ^2 &=\fr a c{2}{R ^2}\in t_0^R  r  dr \ , 
  \b i g l[ \Ph i_ l({\lambda _ { l,k }},\t fr ac{1 }{2}eBr ^2)\bigr]^2 \\
  & =  \i nt_0^1 dx\, \ big l[
\ Ph i_l ( {\ l amb da _ {l, k } },\alpha x
 is_always smaller_than the lowest energy_gap, $p_{0,1}$._Once_$eB$ becomes_bigger_than the squared_system-size inverse (that_is, $\alpha\gtrsim 10$ from_Fig. \[fig:p01\]), however, the_energy_gap is significantly reduced and the anomalous coupling between the magnetic field and the_rotation_is then_manifested [@Chen:2015hfc;_@Hattori:2016njk].

Integration_Measure and Reweighted wave functions_{#sec:measure}
=================================================

Because the radial momenta are_discretized, we_replace the transverse momentum integration with the sums_over_the quantum numbers,_$l$ and $k$, i.e. $$\int \frac{dp_xdp_y}{(2\pi)^2}
  \longrightarrow \frac{1}{\pi_R^2} \sum_{l=-\infty}^\infty \sum_{k=1}^\infty 
  \frac{1}{{N_{l,k}}^2}\;,
_ \label{eq:phase-space}$$ where_${N_{l,k}}$_represents_a weight factor which_corresponds to the integration measure in_finite-size systems. In the $B=0$ case,_as discussed in Ref. [@Ebihara:2016fwa], the weight factor_is deduced from the Bessel-Fourier expansion,_that is, we know that_in the_limit of $\alpha\to 0$, $$\begin{split}
_ \label{eq:Nlkzero}
 _{N_{l,k}}^2 \;\;\longrightarrow_& \;\;
 _\frac{2}{R^2}\int_0^R r dr\, \bigl[J_l(p_{l,k}r)\bigr]^2 
 _ \end{split}$$ with_the discretized momentum ${p_{l,k}}$ in Eq. ._From_the relation in_Eq. ,_we_extrapolate the_above identification to_nonzero_$\alpha$ as_$$\label{eq:Nlk}
_ \begin{split}
  {N_{l,k}}^2 &= \frac{2}{R^2}\int_0^R_r_dr\,
  \bigl[\Phi_l({\lambda_{l,k}},\tfrac{1}{2}eBr^2)\bigr]^2 \\
  &= \int_0^1_dx\, \bigl[
  \Phi_l({\lambda_{l,k}},\alpha_x