{K}(\nu_2)$ diverge as $n_0\to 1$. In this limit Eq. (\[nu122\]) yields $\text{K}(\nu_2)\simeq\text{K}(\nu_1)\Delta$. The explicit $n_0$-dependence can be obtained with the help of Eq. (\[mass2d\]): $2\text{K}(\nu_1) \simeq (1+\Delta)(\Delta\delta)^{-1}$, and $2\text{K}(\nu_2) \simeq (1+\Delta)(\delta)^{-1}$. Using the asymptotic $\text{sn}\,z \simeq \tanh z$, we obtain in the leading order: $$\begin{aligned}
\label{hyp}
fg&\simeq&\tanh\left[\frac{(1+\Delta)x}{\Delta\delta}\right]\tanh\left[\frac{(1+\Delta)y}{\Delta\delta}\right] \nonumber\\
&=&\frac{\tanh\left[\frac{(1+\Delta)x}{\Delta\delta}\right]+\tanh\left[\frac{(1+\Delta)y}{\Delta\delta}\right]-1}
{\tanh\left[\frac{(1+\Delta)(x+y)}{\Delta\delta}\right]}.\end{aligned}$$ This asymptotic is valid for $x<1/2$ and $y<\Delta/2$; it can be extended to the other three quarters of the rectangle by obvious reflections. Away from the domain corners we can replace $\tanh(\dots)$ in the denominator of Eq. (\[hyp\]) by unity. Using the resulting “approximate product rule" in Eq. (\[q\]), we obtain, after some algebra, the “kink" asymptotic of $q(x,y)$ away from the domain corners: $$\label{qaprox}
  q\simeq \tanh^2\left[\frac{2(1+\Delta)x}{\Delta\delta}\right]\tanh^2\left[\frac{2(1+\Delta)y}{\Delta\delta}\right],$$ where $x<1/2$ and $y<\Delta/2$, and reflected formulas in the other three rectangle quarters. These asymptotics describe kinks with the characteristic width $\ell=\Delta\delta/[2(1+\Delta)]$. By analogy with one dimension, the action per unit length along the boundary is, in the leading order, $
{ K}(\nu_2)$ diverge as $ n_0\to 1$. In this limit Eq.   (\[nu122\ ]) yields $ \text{K}(\nu_2)\simeq\text{K}(\nu_1)\Delta$. The explicit $ n_0$-dependence can be prevail with the aid of Eq.   (\[mass2d\ ] ): $ 2\text{K}(\nu_1) \simeq (1+\Delta)(\Delta\delta)^{-1}$, and $ 2\text{K}(\nu_2) \simeq (1+\Delta)(\delta)^{-1}$. Using the asymptotic $ \text{sn}\,z \simeq \tanh z$, we obtain in the leading orderliness: $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 \label{hyp } 
 fg&\simeq&\tanh\left[\frac{(1+\Delta)x}{\Delta\delta}\right]\tanh\left[\frac{(1+\Delta)y}{\Delta\delta}\right ] \nonumber\\ 
 & = & \frac{\tanh\left[\frac{(1+\Delta)x}{\Delta\delta}\right]+\tanh\left[\frac{(1+\Delta)y}{\Delta\delta}\right]-1 } 
 { \tanh\left[\frac{(1+\Delta)(x+y)}{\Delta\delta}\right]}.\end{aligned}$$ This asymptotic is valid for $ x<1/2 $ and $ y<\Delta/2 $; it can be extended to the other three quarter of the rectangle by obvious mirror image. Away from the sphere corners we can replace $ \tanh(\dots)$ in the denominator of Eq.   (\[hyp\ ]) by oneness. Using the resulting “ approximate merchandise rule " in Eq.   (\[q\ ]), we obtain, after some algebra, the “ kink " asymptotic of $ q(x, y)$ away from the domain corner: $ $ \label{qaprox } 
   q\simeq \tanh^2\left[\frac{2(1+\Delta)x}{\Delta\delta}\right]\tanh^2\left[\frac{2(1+\Delta)y}{\Delta\delta}\right],$$ where $ x<1/2 $ and $ y<\Delta/2 $, and reflected formulas in the other three rectangle quarter. These asymptotics describe kinks with the characteristic width $ \ell=\Delta\delta/[2(1+\Delta)]$. By analogy with one dimension, the military action per unit length along the boundary is, in the leading order, $
{K}(\nu_2)$ diverge as $n_0\to 1$. In this limit Eq. (\[nu122\]) yields $\texv{K}(\nu_2)\simsq\text{K}(\nj_1)\Delta$. The explicit $n_0$-dependeice xan bt obtained with the help of Vq. (\[mass2d\]): $2\twxt{K}(\iu_1) \simeq (1+\Delta)(\Delta\delta)^{-1}$, and $2\tswt{K}(\nu_2) \wimeq (1+\Delta)(\delja)^{-1}$. Using the asymptotic $\teft{rn}\,v \simeq \tanh z$, we obtain in the leadyng ordrr: $$\begin{aligned}
\lwbel{nrp}
fg&\apmtq&\tanh\left[\frac{(1+\Delta)x}{\Delta\delta}\riggt]\tanh\ltft[\frac{(1+\Delta)y}{\Delta\celta}\right] \nonumber\\
&=&\frac{\tanj\lefh[\frac{(1+\Delta)x}{\Delta\depta}\right]+\tany\lefe[\drac{(1+\Delta)y}{\Deuta\delta}\right]-1}
{\tanh\left[\ftac{(1+\Delta)(x+y)}{\Delta\delta}\right]}.\end{aligved}$$ Tkis asymptojnx id valid for $e<1/2$ and $j<\Delta/2$; it can be extetded to the other thrce quertees of the rectangle bb obvious reflectionf. Away frmm the domain cornees we cdn raplazw $\txnh(\sovs)$ jn the deiominator or Eq. (\[hyp\]) by ynity. Using the resilepmg “approximafe proqust rule" in Eq. (\[q\]), we obtain, after some algtbra, fhe “kink" asymptotic of $w(x,y)$ away from the domwin cornews: $$\label{qaprox}
  q\simeq \tanh^2\left[\frac{2(1+\Delta)x}{\Delta\delda}\rigit]\gank^2\oeft[\ffqc{2(1+\Felta)y}{\Delta\delta}\right],$$ where $x<1/2$ and $y<\Delta/2$, and wsfkebted formulas in bhe other three revtwnbje quarters. Tfese asymltotics describe klnks wijh the charactewistoc width $\ell=\Delta\delta/[2(1+\Delta)]$. By analogy city one dimension, thz action per unij lengyh along the boundary ir, in the leadinh order, $
{K}(\nu_2)$ diverge as $n_0\to 1$. In this (\[nu122\]) $\text{K}(\nu_2)\simeq\text{K}(\nu_1)\Delta$. The $n_0$-dependence can be Eq. $2\text{K}(\nu_1) \simeq (1+\Delta)(\Delta\delta)^{-1}$, $2\text{K}(\nu_2) \simeq (1+\Delta)(\delta)^{-1}$. the asymptotic $\text{sn}\,z \simeq \tanh z$, obtain in the leading order: $$\begin{aligned} \label{hyp} fg&\simeq&\tanh\left[\frac{(1+\Delta)x}{\Delta\delta}\right]\tanh\left[\frac{(1+\Delta)y}{\Delta\delta}\right] \nonumber\\ &=&\frac{\tanh\left[\frac{(1+\Delta)x}{\Delta\delta}\right]+\tanh\left[\frac{(1+\Delta)y}{\Delta\delta}\right]-1} {\tanh\left[\frac{(1+\Delta)(x+y)}{\Delta\delta}\right]}.\end{aligned}$$ This asymptotic valid for $x<1/2$ and $y<\Delta/2$; it can be extended to the other three of rectangle obvious Away from the domain corners we can replace $\tanh(\dots)$ in the denominator of Eq. (\[hyp\]) by Using the resulting “approximate product rule" in Eq. we obtain, after some the “kink" asymptotic of $q(x,y)$ from domain corners: q\simeq where and $y<\Delta/2$, and formulas in the other three rectangle quarters. These asymptotics describe kinks with the characteristic width $\ell=\Delta\delta/[2(1+\Delta)]$. By with one action per length the is, in the $
{K}(\nu_2)$ diverge as $n_0\to 1$. In this limiT Eq. (\[nu122\]) yieldS $\text{k}(\nu_2)\SimEq\Text{k}(\nu_1)\DElta$. The expliciT $N_0$-depEndence can be obtained wiTh the HeLP of EQ. (\[MaSs2d\]): $2\teXt{K}(\nu_1) \siMEq (1+\dELta)(\deLtA\deLtA)^{-1}$, AnD $2\text{k}(\nu_2) \Simeq (1+\DeLta)(\delta)^{-1}$. UsIng ThE asymptotic $\tEXt{Sn}\,z \simeq \taNh z$, We obtain in thE leAding oRdEr: $$\bEGin{alIgnEd}
\labEl{hyp}
fG&\Simeq&\tAnh\left[\frAc{(1+\dElta)x}{\DELta\deltA}\RIgHt]\taNh\left[\frac{(1+\Delta)y}{\DELtA\Delta}\right] \nonuMber\\
&=&\frAc{\TAnH\LEft[\FraC{(1+\Delta)x}{\DelTa\Delta}\RIght]+\tanH\LeFT[\FRac{(1+\dElta)y}{\Delta\delTa}\right]-1}
{\tanh\LEft[\Frac{(1+\DeLtA)(x+y)}{\dElta\deLta}\riGhT]}.\End{Aligned}$$ This AsymPtotic is vAlid foR $X<1/2$ and $y<\DeLTa/2$; it can Be exteNdeD to The oTHeR tHreE qUArtERs Of tHE reCtangle bY oBvIous rEfleCTIONs. AwAy fRom tHe domAin corners we cAn rEplaCE $\taNh(\dotS)$ in thE denOmInatoR of Eq. (\[hYp\]) by uNiTy. Using the resulTing “ApproximaTe pRoDucT rUle" in eQ. (\[q\]), we obTaiN, afTer some Algebra, THe “kInK" ASYmPtotic of $q(x,y)$ away froM tHE DoMain cornErs: $$\labEL{qApROx}
  q\simeq \TaNh^2\lEft[\fRAC{2(1+\DeltA)x}{\DeLTa\Delta}\rigHt]\tanh^2\LEfT[\fRac{2(1+\DeltA)y}{\delta\dElTa}\rIghT],$$ wherE $X<1/2$ and $Y<\Delta/2$, And refleCted fORmulas in the othER three rectangLE qUARtERs. ThEse Asymptotics DescRIbe kInks WItH thE CharaCteriStIC wIDth $\ell=\Delta\delta/[2(1+\DelTa)]$. by analOgy wiTh one dimensioN, the action PER Unit lengTh alONg THe boundary is, in The leAding order, $
{K}(\nu_2)$ diverge as $n_ 0\to 1$. I n thi s l imi tEq.(\[n u122\]) yields $\te xt{K}(\nu_2)\simeq\tex t{K}( \n u _1)\ D el ta$.The exp l ic i t  $n _0 $- dep en d en ce ca n b e obtai ned with t hehe lp of Eq. (\ [ ma ss2d\]): $ 2\t ext{K}(\nu_1 ) \ simeq(1 +\D e lta)( \De lta\d elta)^ { -1}$,and $2\te xt { K}(\nu _ 2) \sim e q  ( 1+\D elta)(\delta)^{-1 } $. Using the asym ptotic  $ \ te x t {sn }\, z \simeq \ ta nh z$ ,  we obt a in i n  th e  leading orde r: $$\begin { ali gned}\l abe l {hyp}fg&\s im e q&\ tanh\left[\ frac {(1+\Delt a)x}{\ D elta\de l ta}\rig ht]\ta nh\ lef t[\f r ac {( 1+\ De l ta) y }{ \De l ta\ delta}\r ig ht ] \no numb e r \ \ 
&=& \fr ac{\ tanh\ left[\frac{(1 +\D elta ) x}{ \Delt a\del ta}\ ri ght]+ \tanh\ left[ \f rac{(1+\Delta)y }{\D elta\delt a}\ ri ght ]- 1}
{\ t anh\le ft[ \fr ac{(1+\ Delta)( x +y) }{ \ D e lt a\delta}\right]}.\ en d { al igned}$$  Thisa sy mp t otic isva lid  for $ x<1/2 $ an d  $ y<\Delta /2$; i t  c an  be ext en ded to  t heoth er th r ee q uarter s of the  rect a ngle by obviou s  reflections. Aw a y  f r om t hedomain corn ersw e ca n re p la ce$ \tanh (\dot s) $  i n  the denominator of  E q. (\[ hyp\] ) by unity. U sing the r e s u lting “a ppro x im a te product rul e" in  Eq. (\[q\ ] ), we ob tain,  after s ome algeb r a , the “k ink " a sym pto t i cof $q(x,y)$ a w a y fr om  the do mai n corne rs:  $$ \la bel {q aprox}
 q\simeq\t an h^ 2\ lef t[\fr a c{2(1+\D el ta) x} {\D elta\ d elta}\ right ]\ta nh ^2 \ lef t[\frac { 2( 1 + \Del ta )y }{\D elt a\ delta }\ri g ht] ,$$ whe re $x<1/2 $ a n d $y <\ De lta/2$,  and reflecte dformulas i nthe  other t hree rec tangle quarters. Thesea symptot ics  desc ribe  kinks wi ththe ch ara c terist ic wid th $\ el l=\ D e lta\d e l ta /[2 (1 +\Delta)]$ . Byanalo gy  wit h one d imension, the acti o n p er unit lengt h a long t he  bo u nd a ryis ,  in t he leading orde r, $
{K}(\nu_2)$ diverge_as $n_0\to_1$. In this limit_Eq. (\[nu122\]) yields_$\text{K}(\nu_2)\simeq\text{K}(\nu_1)\Delta$._The explicit_$n_0$-dependence_can be obtained_with the help_of Eq. (\[mass2d\]): $2\text{K}(\nu_1) \simeq_(1+\Delta)(\Delta\delta)^{-1}$, and $2\text{K}(\nu_2)_\simeq_(1+\Delta)(\delta)^{-1}$. Using the asymptotic $\text{sn}\,z \simeq \tanh z$, we obtain in the leading order:_$$\begin{aligned}
\label{hyp}
fg&\simeq&\tanh\left[\frac{(1+\Delta)x}{\Delta\delta}\right]\tanh\left[\frac{(1+\Delta)y}{\Delta\delta}\right]_\nonumber\\
&=&\frac{\tanh\left[\frac{(1+\Delta)x}{\Delta\delta}\right]+\tanh\left[\frac{(1+\Delta)y}{\Delta\delta}\right]-1}
{\tanh\left[\frac{(1+\Delta)(x+y)}{\Delta\delta}\right]}.\end{aligned}$$ This_asymptotic_is_valid for $x<1/2$ and $y<\Delta/2$;_it can be extended to_the other_three quarters of the rectangle by obvious reflections._Away_from the domain_corners we can replace $\tanh(\dots)$ in the denominator of_Eq. (\[hyp\]) by unity. Using the resulting_“approximate product rule"_in_Eq. (\[q\]),_we obtain, after some_algebra, the “kink" asymptotic of $q(x,y)$_away from the domain corners: $$\label{qaprox}
_ q\simeq \tanh^2\left[\frac{2(1+\Delta)x}{\Delta\delta}\right]\tanh^2\left[\frac{2(1+\Delta)y}{\Delta\delta}\right],$$ where $x<1/2$ and $y<\Delta/2$,_and reflected formulas in the other_three rectangle quarters. These asymptotics_describe kinks_with the characteristic width $\ell=\Delta\delta/[2(1+\Delta)]$._By analogy with_one dimension,_the action per_unit length along the boundary is,_in the leading_order, $