 flux method [@waf]. The accurate chemical composition of the single crystals was determined by energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS). The standard instrument error for this method is around 10%. The single crystals of $x=0$, 0.010, 0.014, 0.017, 0.028, 0.042, 0.047, 0.061, 0.075 and 0.109 were measured, with a high quality characterized and demonstrated in our previous report [@waf]. X-ray diffraction (XRD) was performed on Smartlab-9 diffractometer (Rikagu) from 10$^{\rm o}$ to 60$^{\rm o}$ with a scanning rate of 2$^{\rm o}$/minute. Measurements of resistivity and Hall effect were conducted by using the PPMS-9T (Quantum Design). The resistivity were measured using the standard four-probe method. The contacts cover the sides of the samples to ensure in-plane transport. Hall coefficient was measured by sweeping the field from -5T to 5T at various temperatures. We firstly confirmed the linearity of Hall resistivity $\rho_{xy}$ to magnetic field in the normal state. An excellent linearity can be observed for all the samples in the normal state except that a very weak deviation from the linearity appears below $T_{\rm SDW}$ in underdoped samples. Then the temperature dependence of Hall coefficients was obtained from the substraction of the voltages measured at 5 T and -5 T, $R_{\rm H}$ = \[$V_{xy}$(5T)-$V_{xy}$(-5T)\]$\times d$/2$I$, where $d$ is the thickness of crystals and $I$ is the current. The cotangent of Hall angle, cot$\theta_{\rm H}$=$\rho/\rho_{xy}$, was calculated at 5 T, where $\rho_{xy}$ is Hall resistivity. It should be addressed that the Hall coefficient can not be well measured at the temperature above 200 K, the possible reason is that Na ions could move above 200 K. All the samples we used are the same with that in our previous work[@waf] and the $T_{\rm c}$, $T_{\rm SDW}$ and $T_{\rm s}$ are summarized in Table 1 and plotted in Fig. 6. All the superconducting samples show nearly full shielding fraction except for the parent compound with filamentary superconductivity.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
======================

We carefully measured the resistivity on single crystals
flux method [ @waf ]. The accurate chemical composition of the single crystal was determine by energy dispersive X - ray spectroscopy (EDS). The standard instrumental role error for this method is about 10% . The unmarried crystals of $ x=0 $, 0.010, 0.014, 0.017, 0.028, 0.042, 0.047, 0.061, 0.075 and 0.109 were measured, with a high quality characterize and demonstrated in our previous composition [ @waf ]. ten - ray diffraction (XRD) was performed on Smartlab-9 diffractometer (Rikagu) from 10$^{\rm o}$ to 60$^{\rm o}$ with a scanning rate of 2$^{\rm o}$/minute. Measurements of resistivity and Hall effect were conduct by using the PPMS-9 T (Quantum Design). The resistivity were measure using the standard four - probe method. The contacts cover the side of the samples to ensure in - plane transport. Hall coefficient was measured by sweep the field from -5 T to 5 T at various temperatures. We first confirm the linearity of Hall resistivity $ \rho_{xy}$ to magnetic field in the normal state. An excellent linearity can be observed for all the samples in the normal state except that a very watery deviation from the linearity appear below $ T_{\rm SDW}$ in underdoped samples. Then the temperature dependence of Hall coefficients was obtained from the substraction of the voltage measured at 5 T and -5 T, $ R_{\rm H}$ = \[$V_{xy}$(5T)-$V_{xy}$(-5T)\]$\times d$/2$I$, where $ d$ is the thickness of crystals and $ I$ is the current. The cotangent of Hall slant, cot$\theta_{\rm H}$=$\rho/\rho_{xy}$, was calculated at 5 T, where $ \rho_{xy}$ is Hall resistivity. It should be addressed that the Hall coefficient cannot be well measured at the temperature above 200 K, the possible reason is that Na ions could move above 200 K. All the samples we used are the like with that in our previous work[@waf ] and the $ T_{\rm c}$, $ T_{\rm SDW}$ and $ T_{\rm s}$ are summarize in Table 1 and plat in Fig. 6. All the superconducting samples show nearly full shielding fraction except for the parent compound with filamentary superconductivity. 

 result AND DISCUSSION 
 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 

 We carefully measured the resistivity on individual crystals
 flkx method [@waf]. The accuraue chemical composition mf the single zrystals was determined by eiergt diskvrsive X-ray spectroscupy (EDS). Tje standqrd mnstrument error for this methkf is eround 10%. The sinnle crystalv of $x=0$, 0.010, 0.014, 0.017, 0.028, 0.042, 0.047, 0.061, 0.075 avd 0.109 were measured, with a high quality characyegized and demogstrseed jn our previous report [@waf]. X-ray dirfractimn (XRD) was petformed on Smartlab-9 diffraftomfter (Rikagu) from 10$^{\rl o}$ to 60$^{\rm o}$ witr a scanning fate of 2$^{\rm o}$/minute. Meaaurements of resistivity and Haul efyect were cineuchgd by using vhe PPIS-9T (Quantum Design). Tve resixtivity were mcasurxd uwing the standard fouc-probe method. The cogtacts coeex the sides of the sanpoes tm envure un-puant tcanaport. Jalm coefficisnt was meawured by sweeping tne dield from -5T fo 5T ae darious temperatures. We firstly confirmtd ths linearity of Hall resustivity $\rho_{xy}$ to magjetic fiejd in the normal state. An excellent linearity can be ousdrvtd for xol the samples in the normal state except that w vtry weak deviatiok from the lineariyy alkears below $T_{\ro SDW}$ nh hnderdoped samples. Then tre tenperature deprndence of Hall coefficientw was obtainvd feom the substractiln of the vultabes mrasured at 5 T and -5 T, $R_{\ro H}$ = \[$V_{xy}$(5T)-$V_{xy}$(-5T)\]$\tiles d$/2$I$, whsfe $d$ is the thicynexs of crysuxls and $I$ is the surrent. Tie cocangent uf Hsll andle, cot$\theha_{\rm M}$=$\sho/\rho_{xy}$, was calcupated ad 5 T, where $\rho_{xy}$ is Hall resistivity. It sipuld be addrgssad nhat the Kall cpefficient cag not be well keasureb at tfe temperanure abovx 200 K, the posfible reason hd that Na iois could iove aboce 200 K. Auu the samples ee used age the same with that in out lrevious work[@way] qnd the $T_{\rm c}$, $T_{\tm RDW}$ ajd $T_{\wk s}$ are summdrizdd km Tabue 1 and plobtea in Fig. 6. All the supercmndudting samples show ncarly fulo shieldyng fraction rxcept for the partnt cokponnd wiyh silamentary superconductivity.

RSSULTS ANF DLSCUSSION
======================

We cwrefmlly measured che resistivity on single crystals
flux method [@waf]. The accurate chemical composition single was determined energy dispersive X-ray error this method is 10%. The single of $x=0$, 0.010, 0.014, 0.017, 0.028, 0.047, 0.061, 0.075 and 0.109 were measured, with a high quality characterized and in our previous report [@waf]. X-ray diffraction (XRD) was performed on Smartlab-9 diffractometer from o}$ 60$^{\rm with a scanning rate of 2$^{\rm o}$/minute. Measurements of resistivity and Hall effect were conducted by the PPMS-9T (Quantum Design). The resistivity were measured the standard four-probe method. contacts cover the sides of samples ensure in-plane Hall was by sweeping the from -5T to 5T at various temperatures. We firstly confirmed the linearity of Hall resistivity $\rho_{xy}$ to field in state. An linearity be for all the the normal state except that a from the linearity appears below $T_{\rm SDW}$ in samples. Then temperature dependence of Hall coefficients was from the substraction of the voltages measured at T and -5 T, $R_{\rm H}$ = \[$V_{xy}$(5T)-$V_{xy}$(-5T)\]$\times d$/2$I$, where $d$ is the thickness of $I$ is the current. cotangent of Hall cot$\theta_{\rm was at T, where is Hall resistivity. It should be addressed that the Hall coefficient not be well measured at the temperature above 200 K, reason that Na ions move above 200 K. the we used are the that our the c}$, SDW}$ and $T_{\rm s}$ summarized in Table 1 and in Fig. 6. All full shielding fraction except for the parent compound filamentary superconductivity. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION ====================== We measured the resistivity on single crystals
 flux method [@waf]. The accurate cHemical comPositIon Of tHe SingLe crYstals was deterMIned By energy dispersive X-ray SpectRoSCopy (edS). the stAndard iNStRUMenT eRrOr fOr THiS methOd iS around 10%. the single cRysTaLs of $x=0$, 0.010, 0.014, 0.017, 0.028, 0.042, 0.047, 0.061, 0.075 and 0.109 were MEaSured, with a HigH quality charActErized AnD deMOnstrAteD in ouR previOUs repoRt [@waf]. X-ray DiFFractiON (XRD) was PERfOrmeD on Smartlab-9 diffraCToMEter (Rikagu) from 10$^{\Rm o}$ to 60$^{\rM o}$ WItH A ScaNniNg rate of 2$^{\rm O}$/mInute. mEasuremENtS OF ResIStivity and HalL effect were COndUcted bY uSinG The PPMs-9T (QuaNtUM DeSign). The resiStivIty were meAsured USing the STandard Four-prObe MetHod. THE cOnTacTs COveR ThE siDEs oF the sampLeS tO ensuRe in-PLANE traNspOrt. HAll coEfficient was mEasUred BY swEepinG the fIeld FrOm -5T to 5t at varIous tEmPeratures. We firsTly cOnfirmed tHe lInEarItY of HaLL resisTivIty $\Rho_{xy}$ to MagnetiC FieLd IN THe Normal state. An excelLeNT LiNearity cAn be obSErVeD For all thE sAmpLes iN THe norMal sTAtE except tHat a veRY wEaK deviatIoN from tHe LinEarIty apPEars Below $T_{\Rm SDW}$ in uNderdOPed samples. Then THe temperature DEpENDeNCe of halL coefficienTs waS ObtaIned FRoM thE SubstRactiOn OF tHE voltages measured at 5 t aNd -5 T, $R_{\rm h}$ = \[$V_{xy}$(5T)-$v_{xy}$(-5T)\]$\times d$/2$I$, whEre $d$ is the tHICKness of cRystALs ANd $I$ is the currenT. The cOtangent of hAll angle, Cot$\thEta_{\rm H}$=$\rhO/\rho_{xy}$, was CALculated At 5 T, WheRe $\rHo_{xY}$ IS HAll resistivitY. iT shoUlD be addrEssEd that tHe HAll CoeFfiCiEnt can not Be well meAsUrEd At The TempeRAture aboVe 200 k, thE pOssIble rEAson is That NA ionS cOuLD moVe above 200 k. alL THe saMpLeS we uSed ArE the sAme wITh tHat in ouR previous WorK[@Waf] aNd ThE $T_{\rm c}$, $T_{\rM SDW}$ and $T_{\rm s}$ arE sUmmarized iN TAblE 1 and plOTTed in Fig. 6. all the superconducting saMPles shoW neArly fUll sHielding fRacTion exCepT For the Parent CompoUnD wiTH FilamENTaRy sUpErconductiVITy.

ReSULTs AnD DIsCUSSIOn
======================

We carefully measurED thE resistivity oN siNgle CRYsTalS
 flux method [@waf]. The a ccurate ch emica l c omp os itio n of  the single cr y stal s was determined by en ergydi s pers i ve  X-ra y spect r os c o py(E DS ).Th e  s tanda rdinstrum ent errorfor  t his method i s  a round 10%.  Th e single cry sta ls of$x =0$ ,  0.01 0,0.014 , 0.01 7 , 0.02 8, 0.042,  0 . 047, 0 . 061, 0. 0 7 5and0.109 were measur e d, with a high qu alitych a ra c t eri zed  and demon st rated in ourp re v i o usr eport [@waf].  X-ray diff r act ion (X RD ) w a s perf ormed  o n  Sm artlab-9 di ffra ctometer(Rikag u ) from1 0$^{\rm  o}$ t o 6 0$^ {\rm o} $wit ha  sc a nn ing rat e of 2$^ {\ rm  o}$/ minu t e . Meas ure ment s ofresistivity a ndHall eff ect w ere c ondu ct ed by  using  thePP MS-9T (QuantumDesi gn). Theres is tiv it y wer e  measu red  us ing the  standa r d f ou r - p ro be method. The con ta c t scover th e side s  o ft he sampl es  to  ens u r e in- plan e  t ransport . Hall co ef ficient  w as mea su red  by  swee p ingthe fi eld from  -5Tt o 5T at variou s  temperatures .  W e fi r stly  co nfirmed the  lin e arit y of Ha llr esist ivity  $ \ rh o _{xy}$ to magneticfi eld in  thenormal state.  An excell e n t  lineari ty c a nb e observed for  allthe sample s  in thenorma l stateexcept th a t  a verywea k d evi ati o n  f rom the linea r i ty a pp ears be low  $T_{\r m S DW} $ i n u nd erdoped s amples.Th en  t he  te mpera t ure depe nd enc eofHallc oeffic ients  was  o bt a ine d fromt he s ubst ra ct ionofth e vol tage s  me asuredat 5 T an d - 5  T,$R _{ \rm H}$  = \[$V_{xy}$ (5 T)-$V_{xy} $( -5T )\]$\t i m es d$/2$ I$, where $d$ is the th i cknessofcryst alsand $I$ i s t he cur ren t . Thecotang ent o fHal l angle , co t$\ th eta_{\rm H } $ =$\ rho/\ rh o_{x y}$, wa s calculated at 5T , w here $\rho_{x y}$  isH a ll  re s is t ivi ty .  It s hould be addres sed that t he Ha ll coeffic i ent  c an notbe well  meas u red atthe tempe rature ab ov e 20 0 K,the possib le reaso n is that Na io n scould  mo ve abo ve  20 0 K.All th e  sa mples  we us ed  are t he sa me  with th at in our previous work [@waf]  andthe  $T_{\rmc}$ ,  $T _{\rm SDW }$ a nd $T_{\rm  s} $ a re su mma r izedin T a bl e 1 and p lott e d in Fig. 6.  Al l th e supercond u c t ing  samp les show n earl y full shieldingf raction except  for t hepar e nt c om pound with fil ame nt a r y superc on ductivity.
RESULTS  A N D DIS CUSSIO N
==== ======= = = == = ====== 

We  ca refully m eas ur e d the r es is t ivityon s in gle cr ystals 
 flux_method [@waf]._The accurate chemical composition_of the_single_crystals was_determined_by energy dispersive_X-ray spectroscopy (EDS)._The standard instrument error_for this method_is_around 10%. The single crystals of $x=0$, 0.010, 0.014, 0.017, 0.028, 0.042, 0.047, 0.061,_0.075_and 0.109_were_measured,_with a high quality characterized_and demonstrated in our previous_report [@waf]._X-ray diffraction (XRD) was performed on Smartlab-9 diffractometer_(Rikagu)_from 10$^{\rm o}$_to 60$^{\rm o}$ with a scanning rate of 2$^{\rm_o}$/minute. Measurements of resistivity and Hall_effect were conducted_by_using_the PPMS-9T (Quantum Design)._The resistivity were measured using the_standard four-probe method. The contacts cover_the sides of the samples to ensure_in-plane transport. Hall coefficient was measured_by sweeping the field from_-5T to_5T at various temperatures. We_firstly confirmed the_linearity of_Hall resistivity $\rho_{xy}$_to magnetic field in the normal_state. An excellent_linearity can be observed for all_the_samples in the_normal_state_except that_a very weak_deviation_from the_linearity_appears below $T_{\rm SDW}$ in underdoped_samples._Then the temperature dependence of Hall coefficients_was obtained from the_substraction_of the voltages measured_at 5 T and -5_T, $R_{\rm H}$ = \[$V_{xy}$(5T)-$V_{xy}$(-5T)\]$\times d$/2$I$,_where $d$_is the_thickness of crystals and $I$ is the current. The cotangent of_Hall angle, cot$\theta_{\rm H}$=$\rho/\rho_{xy}$, was calculated_at 5 T, where_$\rho_{xy}$ is_Hall_resistivity. It should_be_addressed that_the Hall coefficient can not be well_measured at_the temperature above 200 K, the_possible reason is that_Na_ions could move above 200 K._All the samples we used are_the same with that in_our_previous_work[@waf] and the $T_{\rm c}$,_$T_{\rm SDW}$ and $T_{\rm s}$ are_summarized in Table_1 and plotted in Fig. 6. All_the_superconducting samples show nearly full shielding_fraction_except for the parent compound with_filamentary_superconductivity.

RESULTS_AND DISCUSSION
======================

We carefully measured the_resistivity on single crystals