 
J^{n_1n_2}\stackrel{\text{$f_3$}}{\leftarrow} 
J^{n_1n_2n_3}\stackrel{\text{$f_4$}}{\leftarrow}\ldots$$ We use the notation of the proof of Lemma \[lem:Mayerprep\]. Lemma \[lem:indecsubc\] implies that for every sequence $(n_i)$ there exists an embedding of $Y$ such that both points of $\partial J\leftarrow \partial 
J^{n_1}\leftarrow \partial J^{n_1n_2}\leftarrow \partial 
J^{n_1n_2n_3}\leftarrow\ldots$ are accessible and which can be extended to an embedding of $X$. This completes the proof.

We have proven that every chainable continuum containing a nondegenerate indecomposable subcontinuum has uncountably many embeddings that are not strongly equivalent. Thus we pose the following question.

\[q:above\] Which hereditarily decomposable chainable continua have uncountably many planar embeddings that are not equivalent and/or strongly equivalent?

Mayer has constructed uncountably many nonequivalent planar embeddings (in both senses) in [@May] of the $\sin\frac 1x$ continuum by varying the rate of convergence of the ray. This approach readily generalizes to any Elsa continuum. We do not know whether the approach can be generalized to all chainable continua which contain a dense ray. Specifically, it would be interesting to see if $\underleftarrow{\lim}\{I, f_{Feig}\}$ (where $f_{Feig}$ denotes the logistic interval map at the Feigenbaum parameter) can be embedded in uncountably many nonequivalent ways. However, this approach would not generalize to the remaining hereditarily decomposable chainable continua since there exist hereditarily decomposable chainable continua which do not contain a dense ray, see [@Jan].

\[rem:n\_emb\] In Figure \[fig:n\_embed\] we give examples of planar continua which have exactly $n\in\N$ or countably many nonequivalent planar embeddings. However, except for the arc, all the examples we know are not chainable.

(1,1)–(2,1); (1,1)–(0,1); (1,1)–(1,2); (1,1)–(1,
J^{n_1n_2}\stackrel{\text{$f_3$}}{\leftarrow } 
 J^{n_1n_2n_3}\stackrel{\text{$f_4$}}{\leftarrow}\ldots$$ We use the notation of the proof of Lemma   \[lem: Mayerprep\ ]. Lemma   \[lem: indecsubc\ ] implies that for every succession $ (n_i)$ there exist an embedding of $ Y$ such that both points of $ \partial J\leftarrow \partial 
 J^{n_1}\leftarrow \partial J^{n_1n_2}\leftarrow \partial 
 J^{n_1n_2n_3}\leftarrow\ldots$ are accessible and which can be extended to an embedding of $ X$. This dispatch the validation. 

 We have proven that every chainable continuum containing a nondegenerate indecomposable subcontinuum has uncountably many embeddings that are not powerfully equivalent. therefore we pose the following question. 

 \[q: above\ ] Which hereditarily decomposable chainable continua have uncountably many planar embeddings that are not equivalent and/or powerfully equivalent? 

 Mayer has constructed uncountably many nonequivalent planar embeddings (in both senses) in [ @May ] of the $ \sin\frac 1x$ continuum by varying the rate of overlap of the ray. This approach promptly generalizes to any Elsa continuum. We do not acknowledge whether the access can be generalized to all chainable continua which contain a dense re. Specifically, it would be interesting to see if $ \underleftarrow{\lim}\{I, f_{Feig}\}$ (where $ f_{Feig}$ denotes the logistic interval function at the Feigenbaum parameter) can be embed in uncountably many nonequivalent ways. However, this approach would not generalize to the remain hereditarily decomposable chainable continua since there exist hereditarily decomposable chainable continua which do not contain a dense ray, see [ @Jan ]. 

 \[rem: n\_emb\ ] In Figure   \[fig: n\_embed\ ] we give examples of planar continua which have exactly $ n\in\N$ or countably many nonequivalent planar embeddings. However, except for the arc, all the examples we know are not chainable. 

 (1,1)–(2,1); (1,1)–(0,1); (1,1)–(1,2); (1,1)–(1,
 
J^{n_1j_2}\stackrel{\text{$f_3$}}{\leftarrow} 
M^{n_1n_2n_3}\stackrel{\text{$y_4$}}{\oeftarcow}\ldota$$ We use the notation of the proof oh Lenma \[len:Mayerprep\]. Lemma \[lem:inddcsubc\] imilies thar foc every sequence $(n_i)$ therc exiabs an xmbedding of $Y$ xuch that toth points of $\pxrcial J\leftarrow \partial 
J^{n_1}\leftarrow \[artial J^{j_1n_2}\leftarrow \pattial 
T^{n_1n_2n_3}\mvfuarrow\ldots$ are accessible and whjch can be extended yo an embedding of $X$. This fomppetes the proof.

We jave proven thae every chainxble continuum containjng a nondegenerate indecomposacle sbbcontinuum hqs ktcountably nany vmbeddings that are nmt stromgly equivalenb. Thuv ww pose the following xuestion.

\[q:above\] Whish heredidaxily decomposable chaunqble wonthnua yavd uhcpuhtably maiy planar ejbeddings tyat are not equivaltnt qnd/or stronglg equidajent?

Mayer has constructed uncountably mdny nonequivalent planar enbeddings (in both sendes) in [@Mar] of the $\sin\frac 1x$ continuum by varying the rate mf coivdrgtngc of rhf ray. This approach readily generalizes to anr Ekss continuum. We do not knoe ahrjher the approxch cau bs generalized to apl chaigable continua whivh contain a dense ray. Specufically, it couod be interesting co see if $\unberlefjarrow{\kim}\{I, f_{Feig}\}$ (where $f_{Feig}$ benotea the logishic interbxl map at the Fekgekbagm paramtger) can be embeddqd in unciuntcbly manh nomequivwlent ways. Howeyar, this approach wluld uot ganeralize ho the remaining hereditarily dxromposable chsitabne contiuua sikce there exist hereditarily becomposcble cfainable ckntinua which do njt contain a ggnse ray, see [@Oan].

\[rem:n\_emf\] In Figyre \[fig:n\_dobed\] we give ecamples oy plabar continua which haxs exactly $n\in\N$ ir xountably many mondquyvwlxnt pjdnar embedditgs. Fowdfer, ebcept for tme xrc, sll the examples we nnow are not chainable.

(1,1)–(2,1); (1,1)–(0,1); (1,1)–(1,2); (1,1)–(1,
J^{n_1n_2}\stackrel{\text{$f_3$}}{\leftarrow} J^{n_1n_2n_3}\stackrel{\text{$f_4$}}{\leftarrow}\ldots$$ We use the notation of of \[lem:Mayerprep\]. Lemma implies that for an of $Y$ such both points of J\leftarrow \partial J^{n_1}\leftarrow \partial J^{n_1n_2}\leftarrow \partial are accessible and which can be extended to an embedding of $X$. This the proof. We have proven that every chainable continuum containing a nondegenerate indecomposable has many that not strongly equivalent. Thus we pose the following question. \[q:above\] Which hereditarily decomposable chainable continua have many planar embeddings that are not equivalent and/or equivalent? Mayer has constructed many nonequivalent planar embeddings (in senses) [@May] of $\sin\frac continuum varying the rate convergence of the ray. This approach readily generalizes to any Elsa continuum. We do not know whether approach can to all continua contain dense ray. Specifically, be interesting to see if $\underleftarrow{\lim}\{I, denotes the logistic interval map at the Feigenbaum can be in uncountably many nonequivalent ways. However, approach would not generalize to the remaining hereditarily chainable continua since there exist hereditarily decomposable chainable continua which do not contain a dense [@Jan]. \[rem:n\_emb\] In Figure we give examples planar which exactly or countably nonequivalent planar embeddings. However, except for the arc, all the examples know are not chainable. (1,1)–(2,1); (1,1)–(0,1); (1,1)–(1,2); (1,1)–(1,
 
J^{n_1n_2}\stackrel{\text{$f_3$}}{\leftarrow} 
j^{n_1n_2n_3}\stackrEl{\texT{$f_4$}}{\lEftArRow}\lDots$$ we use the notatiON of tHe proof of Lemma \[lem:MayerPrep\]. LEmMA \[lem:INdEcsubC\] implieS ThAT For EvErY seQuENcE $(n_i)$ thEre Exists aN embedding Of $Y$ SuCh that both poINtS of $\partial j\leFtarrow \partiAl 
J^{N_1}\leftaRrOw \pARtial j^{n_1n_2}\LeftaRrow \paRTial 
J^{n_1N_2n_3}\leftarrOw\LDots$ arE AccessiBLE aNd whIch can be extended tO An EMbedding of $X$. ThiS complEtES tHE ProOf.

WE have proveN tHat evERy chainABlE CONtiNUum containing A nondegenerATe iNdecomPoSabLE subcoNtinuUm HAs uNcountably mAny eMbeddings That arE Not stroNGly equiValent. thuS we Pose THe FoLloWiNG quEStIon.

\[Q:AboVe\] Which hErEdItariLy deCOMPOsabLe cHainAble cOntinua have unCouNtabLY maNy plaNar emBeddInGs thaT are noT equiVaLent and/or strongLy eqUivalent?

MAyeR hAs cOnStrucTEd uncoUntAblY many noNequivaLEnt PlANAR eMbeddings (in both senSeS) IN [@MAy] of the $\sIn\frac 1X$ CoNtINuum by vaRyIng The rATE of coNverGEnCe of the rAy. This APpRoAch readIlY generAlIzeS to Any ElSA conTinuum. we do not kNow whETher the approacH Can be generaliZEd TO AlL ChaiNabLe continua wHich COntaIn a dENsE raY. speciFicalLy, IT wOUld be interesting to sEe If $\undeRleftArrow{\lim}\{I, f_{FeiG}\}$ (where $f_{FeiG}$ DENotes the LogiSTiC Interval map at tHe FeiGenbaum parAMeter) can Be embEdded in uNcountablY MAny noneqUivAleNt wAys. hOWeVer, this approaCH WoulD nOt generAliZe to the RemAinIng HerEdItarily deComposabLe ChAiNaBle ContiNUa since tHeRe eXiSt hErediTArily dEcompOsabLe ChAInaBle contINuA WHich Do NoT conTaiN a Dense Ray, sEE [@JaN].

\[rem:n\_emB\] In Figure \[Fig:N\_EmbeD\] wE gIve examPles of planar cOnTinua which HaVe eXactly $N\IN\N$ or counTably many nonequivalent pLAnar embEddIngs. HOwevEr, except fOr tHe arc, aLl tHE exampLes we kNow arE nOt cHAInablE.

(1,1)–(2,1); (1,1)–(0,1); (1,1)–(1,2); (1,1)–(1,
 
J^{n_1n_2}\stackrel{\tex t{$f_3$}}{ \left arr ow}  J^{n _1n_ 2n_3}\stackrel { \tex t{$f_4$}}{\leftarrow}\ ldots $$ We u s ethe n otation of t hepr oo f o fL em ma \[ lem :Mayerp rep\]. Lem ma\[ lem:indecsub c \]  implies t hat  for every s equ ence $ (n _i) $  ther e e xists  an em b edding  of $Y$ s uc h  thatb oth poi n t sof $ \partial J\leftar r ow \partial 
J^{n _1}\le ft a rr o w  \p art ial J^{n_1 n_ 2}\le f tarrow\ pa r t i alJ^{n_1n_2n_3} \leftarrow\ l dot s$ are  a cce s sibleand w hi c h c an be exten dedto an emb edding of $X$. This co mplete s t heproo f .
W e h av e  pr o ve n t h atevery ch ai na ble c onti n u u m  con tai ning  a no ndegenerate i nde comp o sab le su bcont inuu mhas u ncount ablyma ny embeddings t hatare not s tro ng lyeq uival e nt. Th uswepose th e follo w ing  q u e s ti on.

\[q:above\] W hi c h  h ereditar ily de c om po s able cha in abl e co n t inuahave un countabl y many pl an ar embe dd ings t ha t a renot e q uiva lent a nd/or st rongl y  equivalent?
M ayer has cons t ru c t ed unco unt ably many n oneq u ival entp la nar embed dings  ( i nb oth senses) in [@Ma y]  of th e $\s in\frac 1x$ c ontinuum b y v arying t he r a te of convergence  of t he ray. Th i s approa ch re adily ge neralizes t o any El sacon tin uum . We  do not knoww h ethe rthe app roa ch canbegen era liz ed  to all c hainable  c on ti nu a w hichc ontain a  d ens eray . Spe c ifical ly, i t wo ul db e i nterest i ng t o se eif  $\u nde rl eftar row{ \ lim }\{I, f _{Feig}\} $ ( w here  $ f_ {Feig}$  denotes thelo gistic int er val  map a t the Feig enbaum parameter) can b e  embedd edin un coun tably man y n onequi val e nt way s. How ever,  t his a pproa c h  w oul dnot genera l i zeto th erema ining h ereditarily decomp o sab le chainablecon tinu a si nce th e reex i sth e reditarily deco mposable c ha i na ble contin u a w hi ch do n ot cont ain a dense r ay, see [ @Jan].

\ [r em:n \ _ emb \] In Figu re \[fig :n\_embed \ ] weg iv e exa mpl es ofpl ana r con tinuaw hic h hav e exac tl y $n\i n\N$or  countab ly many nonequivalent p lanarembed din gs. Howev er, exc ept for t he a rc, all th e e xam pleswek now a re n o tcha i nable .

( 1 ,1)–(2,1) ;  ( 1,1 ) – (0 ,1); (1,1)– ( 1 , 2);  (1,1 )–( 1 ,
 
J^{n_1n_2}\stackrel{\text{$f_3$}}{\leftarrow}_
J^{n_1n_2n_3}\stackrel{\text{$f_4$}}{\leftarrow}\ldots$$ We_use the notation of_the proof_of_Lemma \[lem:Mayerprep\]. Lemma \[lem:indecsubc\]_implies_that for every_sequence $(n_i)$ there_exists an embedding of_$Y$ such that_both_points of $\partial J\leftarrow \partial 
J^{n_1}\leftarrow \partial J^{n_1n_2}\leftarrow \partial 
J^{n_1n_2n_3}\leftarrow\ldots$ are accessible and which_can_be extended_to_an_embedding of $X$. This completes_the proof.

We have proven that_every chainable_continuum containing a nondegenerate indecomposable subcontinuum has uncountably_many_embeddings that are_not strongly equivalent. Thus we pose the following question.

\[q:above\]_Which hereditarily decomposable chainable continua have_uncountably many planar_embeddings_that_are not equivalent and/or_strongly equivalent?

Mayer has constructed uncountably many_nonequivalent planar embeddings (in both senses)_in [@May] of the $\sin\frac 1x$ continuum_by varying the rate of convergence_of the ray. This approach_readily generalizes_to any Elsa continuum. We_do not know_whether the_approach can be_generalized to all chainable continua which_contain a dense_ray. Specifically, it would be interesting_to_see if $\underleftarrow{\lim}\{I,_f_{Feig}\}$_(where_$f_{Feig}$ denotes_the logistic interval_map_at the_Feigenbaum_parameter) can be embedded in uncountably_many_nonequivalent ways. However, this approach would not_generalize to the remaining_hereditarily_decomposable chainable continua since_there exist hereditarily decomposable chainable_continua which do not contain a_dense ray,_see [@Jan].

\[rem:n\_emb\]_In Figure \[fig:n\_embed\] we give examples of planar continua which have exactly_$n\in\N$ or countably many nonequivalent planar_embeddings. However, except for_the arc,_all_the examples we_know_are not_chainable.

(1,1)–(2,1); (1,1)–(0,1); (1,1)–(1,2); (1,1)–(1,