beta,\gamma,\lambda)$ for $2\leq
j\leq J.$ As in the proof of Proposition 4 of Newey (1994a), for any $w_{t}$ we have$$\frac{\partial}{\partial\tau}E[w_{t}|x_{t},y_{tj}=1,\tau]=E[\frac{y_{tj}}{P_{j}(\tilde{v}_{t})}\{w_{t}-E[w_{t}|x_{t},y_{tj}=1]\}S(z_{t})|x_{t}].$$ It follows that$$\begin{aligned}
\frac{\partial E[m(z_{t},\beta_{0},\gamma_{j}(\tau),\gamma_{-j,0})]}{\partial\tau}  &  =-\delta E[A(x_{t})P_{vj}(\tilde{v}_{t})\frac{\partial
E[u_{1,t+1}+H_{t+1}|x_{t},y_{tj}=1,\tau]}{\partial\tau}]\\
&  =-\delta\frac{\partial}{\partial\tau}E[E[A(x_{t})P_{vj}(\tilde{v}_{t})\{u_{1,t+1}+H_{t+1}\}|x_{t},y_{tj}=1,\tau]].\\
&  =-\delta E[A(x_{t})P_{vj}(\tilde{v}_{t})\frac{y_{tj}}{P_{j}(\tilde{v}_{t})}\{u_{1,t+1}+H_{t+1}-\gamma_{j0}(x_{t},\beta_{0},\gamma_{1})\}S(z_{t})]\\
&  =E[\phi_{j}(z_{t},\beta_{0},\gamma_{0},\lambda_{0})S(z_{t})],\end{aligned}$$ showing that the formula for $\phi_{j}$ is correct. The proof for $\phi_{J+1}$ follows similarly. *Q.E.D.*

**Proof of Theorem 3:** Given in text.

**Proof of Theorem 4:** Given in text.

**Proof of Theorem 5:** Let $\bar{\psi}(\gamma,\lambda)=E[\psi
(z_{i},\beta_{0},\gamma,\lambda)]$. Suppose that $\psi
beta,\gamma,\lambda)$ for $ 2\leq 
 j\leq J.$ As in the proof of Proposition 4 of Newey (1994a), for any $ w_{t}$ we have$$\frac{\partial}{\partial\tau}E[w_{t}|x_{t},y_{tj}=1,\tau]=E[\frac{y_{tj}}{P_{j}(\tilde{v}_{t})}\{w_{t}-E[w_{t}|x_{t},y_{tj}=1]\}S(z_{t})|x_{t}].$$ It follows that$$\begin{aligned } 
 \frac{\partial E[m(z_{t},\beta_{0},\gamma_{j}(\tau),\gamma_{-j,0})]}{\partial\tau }   &   = -\delta E[A(x_{t})P_{vj}(\tilde{v}_{t})\frac{\partial 
 E[u_{1,t+1}+H_{t+1}|x_{t},y_{tj}=1,\tau]}{\partial\tau}]\\ 
 &   = -\delta\frac{\partial}{\partial\tau}E[E[A(x_{t})P_{vj}(\tilde{v}_{t})\{u_{1,t+1}+H_{t+1}\}|x_{t},y_{tj}=1,\tau]].\\ 
 &   = -\delta E[A(x_{t})P_{vj}(\tilde{v}_{t})\frac{y_{tj}}{P_{j}(\tilde{v}_{t})}\{u_{1,t+1}+H_{t+1}-\gamma_{j0}(x_{t},\beta_{0},\gamma_{1})\}S(z_{t})]\\ 
 &   = E[\phi_{j}(z_{t},\beta_{0},\gamma_{0},\lambda_{0})S(z_{t})],\end{aligned}$$ showing that the formula for $ \phi_{j}$ is right. The validation for $ \phi_{J+1}$ stick to similarly. * Q.E.D. * 

 * * Proof of Theorem 3 :* *   Given in textbook. 

 * * Proof of Theorem 4 :* *   Given in textbook. 

 * * Proof of Theorem 5 :* *   Let $ \bar{\psi}(\gamma,\lambda)=E[\psi 
 (z_{i},\beta_{0},\gamma,\lambda)]$. Suppose that $ \psi
betw,\gamma,\lambda)$ for $2\leq
j\leq J.$ As in the proof of 'roposifion 4 of Newey (1994a), for any $w_{t}$ we have$$\fcac{\pqrtiao}{\partial\tau}E[w_{t}|x_{t},y_{tj}=1,\tau]=D[\frac{y_{tj}}{P_{u}(\tilde{v}_{t})}\{q_{t}-E[w_{u}|x_{t},y_{tj}=1]\}S(z_{t})|x_{t}].$$ It follows that$$\begih{wliguev}
\frac{\partial E[m(e_{t},\beta_{0},\gamma_{j}(\dau),\gamma_{-j,0})]}{\partidl\gab}  &  =-\delta E[A(x_{t})P_{vj}(\tilde{v}_{t})\frac{\partial
Q[u_{1,t+1}+H_{t+1}|x_{t},u_{tu}=1,\tau]}{\partial\tau}]\\
&  =-\dekea\frzb{\pcrtial}{\partial\tau}E[E[A(x_{t})P_{vj}(\tilde{v}_{t})\{h_{1,t+1}+H_{t+1}\}|x_{t},y_{uj}=1,\tau]].\\
&  =-\delta E[A(x_{t})P_{fj}(\tilde{v}_{t})\frac{y_{tj}}{P_{j}(\tilde{v}_{t})}\{u_{1,h+1}+H_{t+1}-\gwmma_{j0}(x_{t},\beta_{0},\gamma_{1})\}S(z_{h})]\\
&  =E[\phi_{j}(z_{t},\bgfa_{0},\gwnma_{0},\lambda_{0})S(z_{t})],\dnd{aligned}$$ showing thaj the formula for $\phi_{j}$ is correcg. The proof for $\pyi_{J+1}$ xollows simmlarly. *Q.E.D.*

**Proof of Theorem 3:** Given on text.

**Proof on Themren 4:** Given in text.

**Proof mf Theorem 5:** Let $\bar{\ksi}(\gamma,\lakbba)=E[\psi
(z_{i},\beta_{0},\gamma,\lambea)]$. Suppmse dhat $\psi
beta,\gamma,\lambda)$ for $2\leq j\leq J.$ As in of 4 of (1994a), for any that$$\begin{aligned} E[m(z_{t},\beta_{0},\gamma_{j}(\tau),\gamma_{-j,0})]}{\partial\tau} & =-\delta E[u_{1,t+1}+H_{t+1}|x_{t},y_{tj}=1,\tau]}{\partial\tau}]\\ & =-\delta\frac{\partial}{\partial\tau}E[E[A(x_{t})P_{vj}(\tilde{v}_{t})\{u_{1,t+1}+H_{t+1}\}|x_{t},y_{tj}=1,\tau]].\\ =-\delta E[A(x_{t})P_{vj}(\tilde{v}_{t})\frac{y_{tj}}{P_{j}(\tilde{v}_{t})}\{u_{1,t+1}+H_{t+1}-\gamma_{j0}(x_{t},\beta_{0},\gamma_{1})\}S(z_{t})]\\ & =E[\phi_{j}(z_{t},\beta_{0},\gamma_{0},\lambda_{0})S(z_{t})],\end{aligned}$$ showing that formula for $\phi_{j}$ is correct. The proof for $\phi_{J+1}$ follows similarly. *Q.E.D.* **Proof Theorem 3:** Given in text. **Proof of Theorem 4:** Given in text. **Proof Theorem Let (z_{i},\beta_{0},\gamma,\lambda)]$. that $\psi
beta,\gamma,\lambda)$ for $2\leq
j\leq j.$ As in the prOof of proPosItIon 4 oF NewEy (1994a), for any $w_{t}$ we hAVe$$\frAc{\partial}{\partial\tau}E[w_{t}|X_{t},y_{tj}=1,\TaU]=e[\fraC{Y_{tJ}}{P_{j}(\tiLde{v}_{t})}\{w_{t}-e[W_{t}|X_{T},Y_{tj}=1]\}s(z_{T})|x_{T}].$$ It FoLLoWs thaT$$\beGin{aligNed}
\frac{\parTiaL E[M(z_{t},\beta_{0},\gamma_{J}(\TaU),\gamma_{-j,0})]}{\parTiaL\tau}  &  =-\delta E[A(x_{T})P_{vJ}(\tilde{V}_{t})\FraC{\PartiAl
E[U_{1,t+1}+H_{t+1}|x_{T},y_{tj}=1,\taU]}{\PartiaL\tau}]\\
&  =-\delta\FrAC{\partiAL}{\partiaL\TAu}e[E[A(x_{T})P_{vj}(\tilde{v}_{t})\{u_{1,t+1}+H_{t+1}\}|x_{t},Y_{Tj}=1,\TAu]].\\
&  =-\delta E[A(x_{t})P_{vj}(\Tilde{v}_{T})\fRAc{Y_{TJ}}{P_{j}(\TilDe{v}_{t})}\{u_{1,t+1}+H_{t+1}-\gaMmA_{j0}(x_{t},\bETa_{0},\gamma_{1})\}s(Z_{t})]\\
&  =e[\PHI_{j}(z_{T},\Beta_{0},\gamma_{0},\lambDa_{0})S(z_{t})],\end{aliGNed}$$ ShowinG tHat THe formUla foR $\pHI_{j}$ iS correct. The ProoF for $\phi_{J+1}$ fOllows SImilarlY. *q.E.D.*

**ProoF of TheOreM 3:** GiVen iN TeXt.

**proOf OF ThEOrEm 4:** GIVen In text.

**PrOoF oF TheoRem 5:** LET $\BAR{\psi}(\GamMa,\laMbda)=E[\Psi
(z_{i},\beta_{0},\gammA,\laMbda)]$. sUppOse thAt $\psi
beta,\gamma,\lambda)$ for$2\leq
j\l eq J. $ A s i ntheproo f of Propositi o n 4of Newey (1994a), forany $ w_ { t}$w ehave$ $\frac{ \ pa r t ial }{ \p art ia l \t au}E[ w_{ t}|x_{t },y_{tj}=1 ,\t au ]=E[\frac{y_ { tj }}{P_{j}(\ til de{v}_{t})}\ {w_ {t}-E[ w_ {t} | x_{t} ,y_ {tj}= 1]\}S( z _{t})| x_{t}].$$  I t  follo w s that$ $ \ be gin{ aligned}
\frac{\p a rt i al E[m(z_{t},\ beta_{ 0} , \g a m ma_ {j} (\tau),\ga mm a_{-j , 0})]}{\ p ar t i a l\t a u}  &  =-\del ta E[A(x_{t } )P_ {vj}(\ ti lde { v}_{t} )\fra c{ \ par tial
E[u_{1 ,t+1 }+H_{t+1} |x_{t} , y_{tj}= 1 ,\tau]} {\part ial \ta u}]\ \ 
&  =-\ de l ta\ f ra c{\ p art ial}{\pa rt ia l\tau }E[E [ A ( x _{t} )P_ {vj} (\til de{v}_{t})\{u _{1 ,t+1 } +H_ {t+1} \}|x_ {t}, y_ {tj}= 1,\tau ]].\\ 
&   =-\delta E[A( x_{t })P_{vj}( \ti ld e{v }_ {t})\ f rac{y_ {tj }}{ P_{j}(\ tilde{v } _{t }) } \ { u_ {1,t+1}+H_{t+1}-\g am m a _{ j0}(x_{t },\bet a _{ 0} , \gamma_{ 1} )\} S(z_ { t })]\\ 
& = E[ \phi_{j} (z_{t} , \b et a_{0},\ ga mma_{0 }, \la mbd a_{0} ) S(z_ {t})], \end{ali gned} $ $ showing that the formula f o r$ \ ph i _{j} $ i s correct.Thep roof  for $\ phi _ {J+1} $ fol lo w ss imilarly. *Q.E.D.*
* *Proof  of T heorem 3:** G iven in te x t . 

**Proo f of Th e orem 4:** Give n intext.

**P r oof of T heore m 5:** L et $\bar{ \ p si}(\gam ma, \la mbd a)= E [ \p si
(z_{i},\be t a _{0} ,\ gamma,\ lam bda)]$.  Su ppo setha t$\psi
beta,\gamma,\lambda)$ for_$2\leq
j\leq J.$_As in the proof_of Proposition_4_of Newey_(1994a),_for any $w_{t}$_we have$$\frac{\partial}{\partial\tau}E[w_{t}|x_{t},y_{tj}=1,\tau]=E[\frac{y_{tj}}{P_{j}(\tilde{v}_{t})}\{w_{t}-E[w_{t}|x_{t},y_{tj}=1]\}S(z_{t})|x_{t}].$$ It_follows that$$\begin{aligned}
\frac{\partial E[m(z_{t},\beta_{0},\gamma_{j}(\tau),\gamma_{-j,0})]}{\partial\tau} _&  =-\delta_E[A(x_{t})P_{vj}(\tilde{v}_{t})\frac{\partial
E[u_{1,t+1}+H_{t+1}|x_{t},y_{tj}=1,\tau]}{\partial\tau}]\\
&_ =-\delta\frac{\partial}{\partial\tau}E[E[A(x_{t})P_{vj}(\tilde{v}_{t})\{u_{1,t+1}+H_{t+1}\}|x_{t},y_{tj}=1,\tau]].\\
&  =-\delta E[A(x_{t})P_{vj}(\tilde{v}_{t})\frac{y_{tj}}{P_{j}(\tilde{v}_{t})}\{u_{1,t+1}+H_{t+1}-\gamma_{j0}(x_{t},\beta_{0},\gamma_{1})\}S(z_{t})]\\
&  =E[\phi_{j}(z_{t},\beta_{0},\gamma_{0},\lambda_{0})S(z_{t})],\end{aligned}$$ showing that the formula for $\phi_{j}$ is_correct._The proof_for_$\phi_{J+1}$_follows similarly. *Q.E.D.*

**Proof of Theorem_3:** Given in text.

**Proof of Theorem_4:** Given in_text.

**Proof of Theorem 5:** Let $\bar{\psi}(\gamma,\lambda)=E[\psi
(z_{i},\beta_{0},\gamma,\lambda)]$. Suppose that $\psi