 \right) \: = \: q_2,
\label{eq:fn:qsc}$$ which precisely match the known quantum sheaf cohomology ring relations for this case [@McOrist:2007kp; @McOrist:2008ji; @Donagi:2011uz; @Donagi:2011va].

Next, we integrate out some of the fields to find a lower-energy effective Landau-Ginzburg description of the same physics. If we integrate out $F_0$, $F_w$, we get the constraints $$\begin{aligned}
a_0 \sigma \: + \: b_0 \tilde{\sigma} & = & \exp\left( - Y_0 \right),
\\
\gamma_1 \sigma \: + \: \beta_1 \tilde{\sigma} & = & \exp\left( - Y_w \right),\end{aligned}$$ which can be solved to give $$\begin{aligned}
\sigma & = & \frac{1}{\Delta_0} \left( \beta_1 \exp\left( - Y_0 \right)
\: - \: b_0 \exp\left( - Y_w \right) \right),
\label{eq:fn:opmirror1}
\\
\tilde{\sigma} & = & \frac{1}{\Delta_0} \left( a_0 \exp\left( - Y_w \right)
\: - \: \gamma_1 \exp\left( - Y_0 \right) \right),
\label{eq:fn:opmirror2}\end{aligned}$$ for $$\Delta_0 \: = \: a_0 \beta_1 - b_0 \gamma_1.$$ Using the $\Upsilon$ constraints to eliminate $Y_0$, $Y_w$, we have $$\begin{aligned}
\exp\left( - Y_w \right) & = & q_2 \exp\left( + Y_s \right),
\\
\exp\left( - Y_0 \right) & = & q_1 \exp\left( + Y_1 \right)
\exp\left( + n Y_w \right) \: = \:
(q_1 q_2^{-n} ) \exp\left( + Y_1 \right) \exp\left( - n Y_s
\right) \: = \: q_2, 
 \label{eq: fn: qsc}$$ which precisely match the known quantum sheaf cohomology ring relative for this subject [ @McOrist:2007kp; @McOrist:2008ji; @Donagi:2011uz; @Donagi:2011va ]. 

 Next, we integrate out some of the fields to find a low - energy effective Landau - Ginzburg description of the same purgative. If we integrate out $ F_0 $, $ F_w$, we get the constraints $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 a_0 \sigma \: + \: b_0 \tilde{\sigma } & = & \exp\left (- Y_0 \right), 
 \\ 
 \gamma_1 \sigma \: + \: \beta_1 \tilde{\sigma } & = & \exp\left (- Y_w \right),\end{aligned}$$ which can be solve to give $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 \sigma & = & \frac{1}{\Delta_0 } \left (\beta_1 \exp\left (- Y_0 \right) 
 \: - \: b_0 \exp\left (- Y_w \right) \right), 
 \label{eq: fn: opmirror1 } 
 \\ 
 \tilde{\sigma } & = & \frac{1}{\Delta_0 } \left (a_0 \exp\left (- Y_w \right) 
 \: - \: \gamma_1 \exp\left (- Y_0 \right) \right), 
 \label{eq: fn: opmirror2}\end{aligned}$$ for $ $ \Delta_0 \: = \: a_0 \beta_1 - b_0 \gamma_1.$$ Using the $ \Upsilon$ constraint to eliminate $ Y_0 $, $ Y_w$, we have $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 \exp\left (- Y_w \right) & = & q_2 \exp\left (+ Y_s \right), 
 \\ 
 \exp\left (- Y_0 \right) & = & q_1 \exp\left (+ Y_1 \right) 
 \exp\left (+ n Y_w \right) \: = \: 
 (q_1 q_2^{-n }) \exp\left (+ Y_1 \right) \exp\left (- newton Y_s
 \rihht) \: = \: q_2,
\label{eq:fn:qsc}$$ whigh precisely matey the nnown suantum rheaf cohomology ring relatilnw for this case [@McOrist:2007kp; @MzOrist:2008ji; @Fonagi:2011uz; @Donegi:2011va].

Next, we intxfrate omc soms of chx fields to finc a lower-etergy effectiva Uaudau-Ginzburg description of the same physicx. Lf we integratg out $S_0$, $F_w$, we get the constraints $$\begin{alignsd}
a_0 \sigka \: + \: b_0 \tilde{\xigma} & = & \exp\left( - Y_0 \right),
\\
\gwmma_1 \sigma \: + \: \beta_1 \tilfe{\sigma} & = & \gsp\lqdt( - Y_w \right),\dnd{aligned}$$ which can bg solved to give $$\begin{aligned}
\sigoa & = & \frac{1}{\Delta_0} \lwft( \teta_1 \exp\lefv( - Y_0 \rpght)
\: - \: b_0 \exp\lcgt( - Y_w \right) \tight),
\label{eq:fn:ppmmrroe1}
\\
\tilde{\sigma} & = & \frac{1}{\Denta_0} \left( a_0 \exp\left( - Y_w \righd)
\: - \: \gamma_1 \exp\left( - T_0 \eight) \rigvt),
\lacwl{ed:fn:kpkidror2}\enf{almgned}$$ for $$\Dslta_0 \: = \: a_0 \bwta_1 - b_0 \gamma_1.$$ Using uhe $\Llsilon$ constdaints tj eliminate $Y_0$, $Y_w$, we have $$\begin{aligned}
\exk\left( - Y_w \right) & = & q_2 \exp\left( + Y_s \right),
\\
\exp\left( - Y_0 \tight) & = & q_1 \exp\left( + Y_1 \right)
\exp\left( + n Y_w \right) \: = \:
(q_1 q_2^{-n} ) \exp\laft( + B_1 \figkb) \dzp\peft( - n Y_s
\right) \: = \: q_2, \label{eq:fn:qsc}$$ which the quantum sheaf ring relations for @Donagi:2011va]. we integrate out of the fields find a lower-energy effective Landau-Ginzburg description the same physics. If we integrate out $F_0$, $F_w$, we get the constraints a_0 \sigma \: + \: b_0 \tilde{\sigma} & = & \exp\left( - Y_0 \\ \sigma + \beta_1 \tilde{\sigma} & = & \exp\left( - Y_w \right),\end{aligned}$$ which can be solved to give $$\begin{aligned} & = & \frac{1}{\Delta_0} \left( \beta_1 \exp\left( - \right) \: - \: \exp\left( - Y_w \right) \right), \\ & = \frac{1}{\Delta_0} a_0 - Y_w \right) - \: \gamma_1 \exp\left( - Y_0 \right) \right), \label{eq:fn:opmirror2}\end{aligned}$$ for $$\Delta_0 \: = \: a_0 \beta_1 - \gamma_1.$$ Using constraints to $Y_0$, we $$\begin{aligned} \exp\left( - & = & q_2 \exp\left( + \exp\left( - Y_0 \right) & = & q_1 + Y_1 \exp\left( + n Y_w \right) \: \: (q_1 q_2^{-n} ) \exp\left( + Y_1 \right) - n Y_s
 \right) \: = \: q_2,
\label{eq:fn:qsc}$$ which prEcisely matCh the KnoWn qUaNtum SheaF cohomology rinG RelaTions for this case [@McOrisT:2007kp; @McorISt:2008ji; @dOnAgi:2011uz; @donagi:2011vA].

neXT, We iNtEgRatE oUT sOme of The Fields tO find a loweR-enErGy effective LANdAu-Ginzburg DesCription of thE saMe physIcS. If WE inteGraTe out $f_0$, $F_w$, we gET the coNstraints $$\BeGIn{aligNEd}
a_0 \sigmA \: + \: B_0 \TiLde{\sIgma} & = & \exp\left( - Y_0 \right),
\\
\GAmMA_1 \sigma \: + \: \beta_1 \tildE{\sigma} & = & \ExP\LeFT( - y_w \rIghT),\end{aligneD}$$ wHich cAN be solvED tO GIVe $$\bEGin{aligned}
\sigMa & = & \frac{1}{\Delta_0} \LEft( \Beta_1 \exP\lEft( - y_0 \Right)
\: - \: b_0 \Exp\leFt( - y_W \riGht) \right),
\labEl{eq:Fn:opmirroR1}
\\
\tilde{\SIgma} & = & \fraC{1}{\delta_0} \leFt( a_0 \exp\LefT( - Y_w \RighT)
\: - \: \GaMmA_1 \exP\lEFt( - Y_0 \RIgHt) \rIGht),
\Label{eq:fN:oPmIrror2}\End{aLIGNEd}$$ foR $$\DeLta_0 \: = \: a_0 \Beta_1 - b_0 \Gamma_1.$$ Using the $\upsIlon$ COnsTrainTs to eLimiNaTe $Y_0$, $Y_w$, We have $$\Begin{AlIgned}
\exp\left( - Y_w \rIght) & = & Q_2 \exp\left( + Y_S \riGhT),
\\
\exP\lEft( - Y_0 \rIGht) & = & q_1 \exP\leFt( + Y_1 \Right)
\exP\left( + n Y_W \RigHt) \: = \:
(Q_1 Q_2^{-N} ) \ExP\left( + Y_1 \right) \exp\left( - N Y_S
 \right) \: = \: q_2,
\lab el{eq:fn:q sc}$$  wh ich  p reci sely  match the kno w n qu antum sheaf cohomology  ring  r e lati o ns  forthis ca s e[ @ McO ri st :20 07 k p;  @McO ris t:2008j i; @Donagi :20 11 uz; @Donagi: 2 01 1va].

Nex t,we integrate  ou t some  o f t h e fie lds  to f ind al ower-e nergy eff ec t ive La n dau-Gin z b ur g de scription of thes am e  physics. If w e inte gr a te o ut$F_ 0$, $F_w$,  w e get the con s tr a i n ts$ $\begin{align ed}
a_0 \si g ma\: + \ :b_0 \tilde {\sig ma }  &= & \exp\le ft(- Y_0 \ri ght),\ \
\gamm a _1 \sig ma \:+ \ : \ beta _ 1\t ild e{ \ sig m a}  &=  &\exp\lef t(  -  Y_w\rig h t ) , \end {al igne d}$$which can besol vedt o g ive $ $\beg in{a li gned} 
\sigm a & =  &  \frac{1}{\Delt a_0}  \left( \ bet a_ 1 \ ex p\lef t ( - Y_ 0 \ rig ht)
\:- \: b_ 0  \e xp \ l e ft ( - Y_w \right) \r ig h t ), 
\label{ eq:fn: o pm ir r or1}
\\\t ild e{\s i g ma} &  = & \f rac{1}{\ Delta_ 0 }\l eft( a_ 0\exp\l ef t(- Y _w \r i ght) 
\: -\: \gamm a_1 \ e xp\left( - Y_0 \right) \righ t ), \ la b el{e q:f n:opmirror2 }\en d {ali gned } $$  fo r  $$\D elta_ 0\ :=  \: a_0 \beta_1 - b _0  \gamm a_1.$ $ Using the $ \Upsilon$c o n straints  toe li m inate $Y_0$, $ Y_w$,  we have $ $ \begin{a ligne d}
\exp\ left( - Y _ w  \right)  &= &  q_ 2 \ e x p\ left( + Y_s \ r i ght) ,\\
\exp \le ft( - Y _0\ri ght ) &  =  & q_1 \e xp\left(  +  Y _1  \ rig ht)
\ e xp\left(  +  nY_ w \ right )  \: =\:
(q _1 q _2 ^{ - n}) \exp\ l ef t (  + Y _1  \ righ t)\e xp\le ft(-  nY_s
 \right)_\: =_\: q_2,
\label{eq:fn:qsc}$$ which precisely_match the_known_quantum sheaf_cohomology_ring relations for_this case [@McOrist:2007kp;_@McOrist:2008ji; @Donagi:2011uz; @Donagi:2011va].

Next, we_integrate out some_of_the fields to find a lower-energy effective Landau-Ginzburg description of the same physics. If_we_integrate out_$F_0$,_$F_w$,_we get the constraints $$\begin{aligned}
a_0_\sigma \: + \: b_0_\tilde{\sigma} &_= & \exp\left( - Y_0 \right),
\\
\gamma_1 \sigma \:_+_\: \beta_1 \tilde{\sigma}_& = & \exp\left( - Y_w \right),\end{aligned}$$ which can_be solved to give $$\begin{aligned}
\sigma &_= & \frac{1}{\Delta_0}_\left(_\beta_1_\exp\left( - Y_0 \right)
\:_- \: b_0 \exp\left( - Y_w_\right) \right),
\label{eq:fn:opmirror1}
\\
\tilde{\sigma} & = & \frac{1}{\Delta_0}_\left( a_0 \exp\left( - Y_w \right)
\: -_\: \gamma_1 \exp\left( - Y_0 \right)_\right),
\label{eq:fn:opmirror2}\end{aligned}$$ for $$\Delta_0 \: =_\: a_0_\beta_1 - b_0 \gamma_1.$$ Using_the $\Upsilon$ constraints_to eliminate_$Y_0$, $Y_w$, we_have $$\begin{aligned}
\exp\left( - Y_w \right) &_= & q_2_\exp\left( + Y_s \right),
\\
\exp\left( - Y_0_\right)_& = &_q_1_\exp\left(_+ Y_1_\right)
\exp\left( + n_Y_w_\right) \:_=_\:
(q_1 q_2^{-n} ) \exp\left( + Y_1_\right)_\exp\left( - n Y_s