n \leq X \\ P^-(n) > Y^2}} 1 \ll X \prod_{q \leq Y^2} \left(1 - \frac{1}{q}\right),$$ where the final inequality follows from applying Brun’s Sieve (cf. [@hr Theorem 2.2]). By Mertens’ Theorem (cf. [@pollack Theorem 3.15]), we have $$\label{brunexcept} X \prod_{q \leq Y^2} \left(1 - \frac{1}{q}\right) \ll \frac{X}{\log Y}.$$

Now, suppose that $k > 1$. On one hand, for all $k > 1$, we have $$\label{lpeq1} 1 + \sum_{l \leq k} \ell^*_p(d_l) \frac{\varphi(d_l)}{\ell^*_p(d_l)} = 1 + \sum_{l \leq k} \varphi(d_l) \leq k d_k \leq Ye^{-(\log X)^\theta} d_k.$$ On the other hand, Lemma \[cor2\] implies that $\ell^*_p(n) > \frac{X}{Ye^{(\log X)^\theta}}$ but for $$\begin{aligned}
\label{bigohppracexcept} O\left(\frac{X}{(\log X)^{\theta} \log \log X}\right)\end{aligned}$$ integers $n \leq X$. For such numbers $n$, for all $i \geq 1$, we have $$\begin{aligned}
\label{lpeq2} \ell^*_p(d_{j+i}) \geq \frac{\ell^*_p(n) d_{j+i}}{n} > \frac{d_{j+i}}{Y e^{(\log X)^\theta}} > \frac{d_j Y^2}{Y e^{(\log X)^\theta}} = Ye^{-(\log X)^\theta} d_j \end{aligned}$$ where the inequalities follow, respectively, from Lemma \[l2\], Lemma \[cor2\] and the assumption that there exists an index $j$ for which holds. As a result, we can combine the inequality from applied with $k = j$ with to show that $$1 + \sum_{l \leq j} \ell^*_p(d_l) \frac{\varphi(d_l)}{\
n \leq X \\ P^-(n) > Y^2 } } 1 \ll X \prod_{q \leq Y^2 } \left(1 - \frac{1}{q}\right),$$ where the final inequality follows from applying Brun ’s Sieve (cf. [ @hr Theorem 2.2 ]). By Mertens ’ Theorem (californium. [ @pollack Theorem 3.15 ]), we take $ $ \label{brunexcept } X \prod_{q \leq Y^2 } \left(1 - \frac{1}{q}\right) \ll \frac{X}{\log Y}.$$ 

 Now, suppose that $ k > 1$. On one hand, for all $ potassium > 1 $, we have $ $ \label{lpeq1 } 1 + \sum_{l \leq k } \ell^*_p(d_l) \frac{\varphi(d_l)}{\ell^*_p(d_l) } = 1 + \sum_{l \leq k } \varphi(d_l) \leq k d_k \leq Ye^{-(\log X)^\theta } d_k.$$ On the early hand, Lemma \[cor2\ ] implies that $ \ell^*_p(n) > \frac{X}{Ye^{(\log X)^\theta}}$ but for $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 \label{bigohppracexcept } O\left(\frac{X}{(\log X)^{\theta } \log \log X}\right)\end{aligned}$$ integers $ n \leq X$. For such number $ n$, for all $ i \geq 1 $, we have $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 \label{lpeq2 } \ell^*_p(d_{j+i }) \geq \frac{\ell^*_p(n) d_{j+i}}{n } > \frac{d_{j+i}}{Y e^{(\log X)^\theta } } > \frac{d_j Y^2}{Y e^{(\log X)^\theta } } = Ye^{-(\log X)^\theta } d_j \end{aligned}$$ where the inequalities surveil, respectively, from Lemma \[l2\ ], Lemma \[cor2\ ] and the assumption that there exists an exponent $ j$ for which holds. As a result, we can combine the inequality from applied with $ k = j$ with to show that $ $ 1 + \sum_{l \leq j } \ell^*_p(d_l) \frac{\varphi(d_l)}{\
n \lfq X \\ P^-(n) > Y^2}} 1 \ll X \prod_{q \ueq Y^2} \left(1 - \frae{1}{w}\right),$$ where the finxl inequality follows from a'plyung Beun’s Sieve (cf. [@hr Theordm 2.2]). By Megtens’ Theirem (xf. [@pollack Theorem 3.15]), we hzye $$\layeo{brunexcept} X \krod_{q \leq Y^2} \neft(1 - \frac{1}{q}\rigvt) \lp \frac{X}{\log Y}.$$

Now, suppose that $k > 1$. On one hamd, for all $k > 1$, wg havt $$\lwbel{miew1} 1 + \sum_{l \leq k} \ell^*_p(d_l) \frac{\varlhi(d_l)}{\eln^*_p(d_l)} = 1 + \sum_{l \keq k} \varphi(d_l) \leq k d_k \lee Ye^{-(\pog X)^\theta} d_k.$$ On tje other habd, Lqnma \[cor2\] implkes that $\ell^*_p(n) > \frac{X}{Yg^{(\log X)^\theta}}$ but for $$\begin{aligned}
\uabel{yigohppracezcwpt} M\left(\frac{X}{(\lig X)^{\treta} \log \log X}\right)\etd{alignrd}$$ integers $n \keq X$. Dor such numbers $n$, foc all $i \geq 1$, we have $$\begin{alicnzd}
\label{lpeq2} \ell^*_p(d_{j+i}) \gwq \frac{\gll^*_p(n) d_{j+i}}{v} > \ffac{s_{j+m}}{Y s^{(\log X)^\hheva}} > \frac{d_j G^2}{Y e^{(\log X)^\thwta}} = Ye^{-(\log X)^\theta} d_k \qbd{aligned}$$ whede the igequalities follow, respectively, from Lekma \[l2\], Lemma \[cor2\] and the aswumption that there edists an yndex $j$ for which holds. As a result, we can combina the knewuwuutj from applied with $k = j$ with to show that $$1 + \fhm_{k \keq j} \ell^*_p(d_l) \fvac{\varphi(d_l)}{\
n \leq X \\ P^-(n) > Y^2}} X \leq Y^2} - \frac{1}{q}\right),$$ where applying Sieve (cf. [@hr 2.2]). By Mertens’ (cf. [@pollack Theorem 3.15]), we have X \prod_{q \leq Y^2} \left(1 - \frac{1}{q}\right) \ll \frac{X}{\log Y}.$$ Now, suppose that > 1$. On one hand, for all $k > 1$, we have $$\label{lpeq1} + \leq \ell^*_p(d_l) = 1 + \sum_{l \leq k} \varphi(d_l) \leq k d_k \leq Ye^{-(\log X)^\theta} d_k.$$ On the hand, Lemma \[cor2\] implies that $\ell^*_p(n) > \frac{X}{Ye^{(\log but for $$\begin{aligned} \label{bigohppracexcept} X)^{\theta} \log \log X}\right)\end{aligned}$$ integers \leq For such $n$, all \geq 1$, we $$\begin{aligned} \label{lpeq2} \ell^*_p(d_{j+i}) \geq \frac{\ell^*_p(n) d_{j+i}}{n} > \frac{d_{j+i}}{Y e^{(\log X)^\theta}} > \frac{d_j Y^2}{Y e^{(\log X)^\theta}} = Ye^{-(\log d_j \end{aligned}$$ inequalities follow, from \[l2\], \[cor2\] and the there exists an index $j$ for a result, we can combine the inequality from with $k j$ with to show that $$1 \sum_{l \leq j} \ell^*_p(d_l) \frac{\varphi(d_l)}{\
n \leq X \\ P^-(n) > Y^2}} 1 \ll X \prod_{q \leq Y^2} \left(1 - \fRac{1}{q}\right),$$ wHere tHe fInaL iNequAlitY follows from apPLyinG Brun’s Sieve (cf. [@hr Theorem 2.2]). by MerTeNS’ TheOReM (cf. [@poLlack ThEOrEM 3.15]), We hAvE $$\lAbeL{bRUnExcepT} X \pRod_{q \leq y^2} \left(1 - \frac{1}{q}\RigHt) \Ll \frac{X}{\log Y}.$$

NOW, sUppose that $K > 1$. On One hand, for alL $k > 1$, wE have $$\lAbEl{lPEq1} 1 + \sum_{L \leQ k} \ell^*_P(d_l) \fraC{\Varphi(D_l)}{\ell^*_p(d_l)} = 1 + \sUm_{L \Leq k} \vaRPhi(d_l) \leQ K D_k \Leq YE^{-(\log X)^\theta} d_k.$$ On the OThER hand, Lemma \[cor2\] iMplies ThAT $\eLL^*_P(n) > \fRac{x}{Ye^{(\log X)^\theTa}}$ But foR $$\Begin{alIGnED}
\LAbeL{BigohppracexcEpt} O\left(\fraC{x}{(\loG X)^{\thetA} \lOg \lOG X}\righT)\end{aLiGNed}$$ Integers $n \leQ X$. FoR such numbErs $n$, foR All $i \geq 1$, WE have $$\beGin{aliGneD}
\laBel{lPEq2} \ElL^*_p(d_{J+i}) \GEq \fRAc{\Ell^*_P(N) d_{j+I}}{n} > \frac{d_{j+I}}{Y E^{(\lOg X)^\thEta}} > \fRAC{D_J Y^2}{Y e^{(\Log x)^\theTa}} = Ye^{-(\lOg X)^\theta} d_j \end{AliGned}$$ WHerE the iNequaLitiEs FolloW, respeCtiveLy, From Lemma \[l2\], Lemma \[Cor2\] aNd the assuMptIoN thAt There EXists aN inDex $J$ for whiCh holds. aS a rEsULT, We Can combine the inequAlITY fRom appliEd with $K = J$ wItH To show thAt $$1 + \Sum_{L \leq J} \ELl^*_p(d_l) \Frac{\VArPhi(d_l)}{\
n \leq X \\ P^-(n) > Y^2}}  1 \ll X \ prod_ {q\le qY^2}  \le ft(1 - \frac{1 } {q}\ right),$$ where the fi nal i ne q uali t yfollo ws from ap p l yin gBr un’ sS ie ve (c f.[@hr Th eorem 2.2] ).By  Mertens’ Th e or em (cf. [@ pol lack Theorem  3. 15]),we  ha v e $$\ lab el{br unexce p t} X \ prod_{q \ le q  Y^2}\ left(1- \f rac{ 1}{q}\right) \ll\ fr a c{X}{\log Y}.$ $

Now ,s up p o setha t $k > 1$.  O n one hand, f o ra l l  $k > 1$, we have  $$\label{l p eq1 } 1 +\s um_ { l \leq  k} \ el l ^*_ p(d_l) \fra c{\v arphi(d_l )}{\el l ^*_p(d_ l )} = 1+ \sum _{l  \l eq k }  \ va rph i( d _l) \l eqk  d_ k \leq Y e^ {- (\log  X)^ \ t h e ta}d_k .$$On th e other hand,  Le mma\ [co r2\]impli es t ha t $\e ll^*_p (n) >  \ frac{X}{Ye^{(\l og X )^\theta} }$bu t f or  $$\b e gin{al ign ed} 
\label {bigohp p rac ex c e p t}  O\left(\frac{X}{( \l o g  X )^{\thet a} \lo g  \ lo g  X}\righ t) \en d{al i g ned}$ $ in t eg ers $n \ leq X$ .  F or  such n um bers $ n$ , f orall $ i  \ge q 1$,we have$$\be g in{aligned}
\l a bel{lpeq2} \e l l^ * _ p( d _{j+ i})  \geq \frac {\el l ^*_p (n)d _{ j+i } }{n}> \fr ac { d_ { j+i}}{Y e^{(\log X) ^\ theta} } > \ frac{d_j Y^2} {Y e^{(\lo g X )^\theta }} = Ye ^ {-(\log X)^\th eta}d_j \end{a l igned}$$  wher e the in equalitie s follow,res pec tiv ely , fr om Lemma \[l2 \ ] , Le mm a \[cor 2\]  and th e a ssu mpt ion  t hat there  existsan  i nd ex  $j $ for which ho ld s.As  aresul t , we c an co mbin eth e  in equalit y  f r o m ap pl ie d wi th$k  = j$  wit h  to  show t hat $$1 +  \s u m_{l  \ le q j} \e ll^*_p(d_l) \ fr ac{\varphi (d _l) }{\
n \leq_X \\_P^-(n) > Y^2}} 1_\ll X_\prod_{q_\leq Y^2}_\left(1_- \frac{1}{q}\right),$$ where_the final inequality_follows from applying Brun’s_Sieve (cf. [@hr_Theorem_2.2]). By Mertens’ Theorem (cf. [@pollack Theorem 3.15]), we have $$\label{brunexcept} X \prod_{q \leq_Y^2}_\left(1 -_\frac{1}{q}\right)_\ll_\frac{X}{\log Y}.$$

Now, suppose that $k_> 1$. On one hand,_for all_$k > 1$, we have $$\label{lpeq1} 1 +_\sum_{l_\leq k} \ell^*_p(d_l)_\frac{\varphi(d_l)}{\ell^*_p(d_l)} = 1 + \sum_{l \leq k} \varphi(d_l) \leq_k d_k \leq Ye^{-(\log X)^\theta} d_k.$$_On the other_hand,_Lemma_\[cor2\] implies that $\ell^*_p(n)_> \frac{X}{Ye^{(\log X)^\theta}}$ but for $$\begin{aligned}
\label{bigohppracexcept}_O\left(\frac{X}{(\log X)^{\theta} \log \log X}\right)\end{aligned}$$ integers_$n \leq X$. For such numbers $n$,_for all $i \geq 1$, we_have $$\begin{aligned}
\label{lpeq2} \ell^*_p(d_{j+i}) \geq \frac{\ell^*_p(n)_d_{j+i}}{n} >_\frac{d_{j+i}}{Y e^{(\log X)^\theta}} > \frac{d_j_Y^2}{Y e^{(\log X)^\theta}}_= Ye^{-(\log_X)^\theta} d_j \end{aligned}$$_where the inequalities follow, respectively, from_Lemma \[l2\], Lemma_\[cor2\] and the assumption that there_exists_an index $j$_for_which_holds. As_a result, we_can_combine the_inequality_from applied with $k = j$_with_to show that $$1 + \sum_{l \leq_j} \ell^*_p(d_l) \frac{\varphi(d_l)}{\