After reconstructing the pre-clusters in the four projections, the final (full) cluster properties are determined by adding the pre-cluster energies and averaging the coordinates of the pre-cluster centres.

In case of more than one cluster per projection the situation is more difficult, as illustrated in figure \[fig:twocl\]:

![Projected views of a two-cluster event.[]{data-label="fig:twocl"}](VLQfig13.eps){width="14cm"}

Two particles hitting the calorimeter lead to eight pre-clusters from which four clusters can be reconstructed so that there is no unique solution. If however the two incident particles deposit clearly different amounts of energy in the calorimeter, combining the low energy pre-clusters versus the high energy ones allows a non-ambiguous solution. This method will of course fail if the particles have similar energies. In this case no unique solution is possible, and the decision needs to be left over to the VLQ track detector [@Hurling].

The Calibration Concept
=======================

Test Beam Calibration
---------------------

Both VLQ calorimeter modules were tested in an electron test beam at the Deutsches Elektronen - Synchrotron DESY in Hamburg. The beam, supplied by the DESY synchrotron, had energies adjustable between 1 and 6 GeV.

In the test setup, the VLQ module to be investigated was fixed at the moving mechanism constructed for operation in H1. As this device supplies only vertical movement, horizontal displacements were performed on a support table driven by a step motor. The vertical and horizontal displacement steps were 5 mm each, corresponding to the scintillator strip width.

The distance between beam collimator and calorimeter module was 5.70 m. The position of the beam in a vertical plane in front of the calorimeter was defined with the help of a silicon tracker telescope. The telescope consisted of two densely packed bundles, each equipped with four Si strip detector planes. The strip orientations were y - x - y - x - x - y - x - y. Each plane contained 384 Si strips of 50 $\mu$m width. The distance between the layers inside one bundle was 10 mm, the two bundles were 17 cm apart from each other. The cross section covered by the telescope was 2 x 2 cm$^2$. The Si - telecope was read out sequentially by a 6 - bit CAMAC ADC. It was sandwiched between two scint
After reconstructing the pre - clusters in the four projections, the final (wide) bunch properties are determined by lend the pre - cluster energy and averaging the coordinates of the pre - cluster center. 

 In case of more than one cluster per project the situation is more difficult, as illustrate in figure \[fig: twocl\ ]: 

! [ Projected view of a two - cluster event.[]{data - label="fig: twocl"}](VLQfig13.eps){width="14 cm " } 

 Two particles hitting the calorimeter lead to eight pre - bunch from which four clusters can be reconstructed so that there is no singular solution. If however the two incident particles deposit intelligibly different sum of energy in the calorimeter, combining the low energy pre - clusters versus the eminent energy ones allows a non - ambiguous solution. This method will of course fail if the particles have similar energies. In this case no unique solution is possible, and the decision needs to be left over to the VLQ track detector [ @Hurling ]. 

 The Calibration Concept 
 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 

 Test Beam Calibration 
 --------------------- 

 Both VLQ calorimeter faculty were tested in an electron test balance beam at the Deutsches Elektronen - Synchrotron DESY in Hamburg. The radio beam, supplied by the DESY synchrotron, had energies adjustable between 1 and 6 GeV. 

 In the trial setup, the VLQ module to be investigated was fixed at the move mechanism constructed for operation in H1. As this device supplies only vertical movement, horizontal displacement were performed on a support table driven by a dance step motor. The vertical and horizontal supplanting steps were 5 mm each, corresponding to the scintillator strip width. 

 The distance between beam collimator and calorimeter module was 5.70   m. The position of the radio beam in a vertical plane in front of the calorimeter was define with the help of a silicon tracker telescope. The telescope consisted of two densely packed bundle, each equipped with four Si strip detector airplane. The strip orientation were y - x - y - x - x - y - x - y. Each plane contain 384 Si strips of 50 $ \mu$m width. The distance between the level inside one bundle was 10 mm, the two bundles were 17 curium apart from each early. The cross section covered by the telescope was 2 x 2 cm$^2$. The Si - telecope was learn out sequentially by a 6 - bit CAMAC ADC. It was sandwiched between two scint
Aftfr reconstructing the prt-clusters in the yiur prmjectikns, the winal (full) cluster propertied qre dtnermined by adding thd pre-clusner energues end averaging thx coordikctes kn the 're-cluster centtes.

In case ox more than ona zlbster per projection the situation if more civficult, as illostraued in rpgmre \[fig:twocl\]:

![Projected views of a two-cluvter event.[]{dats-label="fig:twocl"}](VLQfig13.eps){widhh="14cm"}

Hwo particles hittlng the calirimqrer lead to dight pre-clusters from which four clusters can be recunstrbcted so thqt thfte is no uniwue sjlution. If however tve two oncident partigles vepowit clearly different amounts of energy in the cdlkrimeter, combinint rhe lmw etergh prd-clhsvera versks vhe high ensrgy ones aolows a non-ambiguoux filution. This jethod wyll of course fail if the particles havt simjlar energies. In this cqse no unique solutioj is possyble, and the decision needs to be left over to tha VLQ graej detdxtlr [@Hurling].

The Calibration Concept
=======================

Test Beam Cajjbtanion
---------------------

Both VLQ calovimeter modules wete trfted in an elgctron cssf beam at the Deutdches Ejektrinen - Synshroyron DESY in Hamburg. The beqm, supplied yy rhe DESY synchrotrln, had eneryies acjustsble between 1 and 6 GeV.

Iu the fest setup, hhe VLQ mkaule to be invesgigstad was fixed at the moving mechanisn coustructea fot operaeion in H1. Ws thlv device supplies lnly rertiwal movemejt, horizontal displacements werx performed om d slpport tayle drlven by a step iotor. The vertncal and horixontal disilacement steps were 5 mm each, corsgsponding to vhe scintyllaror wtrip wkath.

The distancr between beam collumator and calorimcter okdule was 5.70 m. The powition of the bram in a vxrticwn plane in fsont of yhe cxlorimeuzr car degined with the help mf a silicon tracker trlcscope. Thg telesco[e consisted pf two densely pacned bnndles, each eqoipped with four Si strip detecfor planed. Tme strip oriegtatlons were y - x - y - x - x - y - x - y. Each plane contained 384 Si strips of 50 $\mo$m width. The distance netween the kayerf inside mne bundle was 10 mm, tye two bundles weve 17 cm apart from each other. The fross section covered by the telescope was 2 x 2 cm$^2$. The Si - telecope was reqd out sequentiallg by a 6 - tic CCMAC ADS. It xas sandwiched benween two scint
After reconstructing the pre-clusters in the four final cluster properties determined by adding the of the pre-cluster In case of than one cluster per projection the is more difficult, as illustrated in figure \[fig:twocl\]: ![Projected views of a two-cluster Two particles hitting the calorimeter lead to eight pre-clusters from which four clusters be so there no unique solution. If however the two incident particles deposit clearly different amounts of energy in calorimeter, combining the low energy pre-clusters versus the energy ones allows a solution. This method will of fail the particles similar In case no unique is possible, and the decision needs to be left over to the VLQ track detector [@Hurling]. The Concept ======================= Calibration --------------------- VLQ modules tested in an beam at the Deutsches Elektronen - Hamburg. The beam, supplied by the DESY synchrotron, energies adjustable 1 and 6 GeV. In the setup, the VLQ module to be investigated was at the moving mechanism constructed for operation in H1. As this device supplies only vertical displacements were performed on support table driven a motor. vertical horizontal displacement were 5 mm each, corresponding to the scintillator strip width. The between beam collimator and calorimeter module was 5.70 m. The the in a vertical in front of the was with the help of tracker The two packed each equipped with four strip detector planes. The strip were y - x x - y - x - y. Each contained 384 Si strips of 50 $\mu$m The distance between the layers inside one bundle was 10 mm, the bundles were apart from each other. The cross section covered the telescope was 2 2 cm$^2$. The Si - telecope was read out by 6 - CAMAC ADC. It sandwiched between two
After reconstructing the pre-Clusters in The foUr pRojEcTionS, the Final (full) clustER proPerties are determined by AddinG tHE pre-CLuSter eNergies ANd AVEraGiNg The CoORdInateS of The pre-cLuster centRes.

in Case of more thAN oNe cluster pEr pRojection the SitUation Is MorE DiffiCulT, as ilLustraTEd in fiGure \[fig:twOcL\]:

![projecTEd views OF A tWo-clUster event.[]{data-labEL="fIG:twocl"}](VLQfig13.epS){width="14Cm"}

tWo PARtiCleS hitting thE cAloriMEter leaD To EIGHt pRE-clusters from Which four clUSteRs can bE rEcoNStructEd so tHaT TheRe is no uniquE solUtion. If hoWever tHE two incIDent parTicles DepOsiT cleARlY dIffErENt aMOuNts OF enErgy in thE cAlOrimeTer, cOMBINing The Low eNergy Pre-clusters veRsuS the HIgh EnergY ones AlloWs A non-aMbiguoUs solUtIon. This method wiLl of Course faiL if ThE paRtIcles HAve simIlaR enErgies. IN this caSE no UnIQUE sOlution is possible, aNd THE dEcision nEeds to BE lEfT Over to thE VlQ tRack DETectoR [@HurLInG].

The CaliBratioN coNcEpt
=======================

Test beAm CaliBrAtiOn
---------------------

BOth VLq CaloRimeteR modules Were tESted in an electrON test beam at thE deUTScHEs ElEktRonen - SynchrOtroN dESY In HaMBuRg. THE beam, SupplIeD By THe DESY synchrotron, haD eNergieS adjuStable between 1 And 6 GeV.

In thE TESt setup, tHe VLq MoDUle to be investiGated Was fixed at THe moving MechaNism consTructed foR OPeration In H1. as tHis DevICE sUpplies only veRTIcal MoVement, hOriZontal dIspLacEmeNts WeRe performEd on a supPoRt TaBlE drIven bY A step motOr. the VeRtiCal anD HorizoNtal dIsplAcEmENt sTeps werE 5 Mm EACh, coRrEsPondIng To The scIntiLLatOr strip Width.

The dIstANce bEtWeEn beam cOllimator and cAlOrimeter moDuLe wAs 5.70 m. The POSition of The beam in a vertical plane IN front oF thE caloRimeTer was defIneD with tHe hELp of a sIlicon TrackEr TelESCope. THE TeLesCoPe consisteD OF twO densElY pacKed bundLes, each equipped witH FouR Si strip detecTor PlanES. thE stRIp ORieNtATioNS Were y - x - y - x - x - y - x - y. EacH plane contAiNEd 384 si strips of 50 $\MU$m wIdTh. The diStance bEtweeN The layeRs inside oNe bundle wAs 10 Mm, thE TWo bUndles were 17 Cm apart fRom each otHEr. The CRoSs secTioN coverEd By tHe telEscope WAs 2 x 2 Cm$^2$. The si - teleCoPe was rEad ouT sEquentiaLly by a 6 - bit CAMAC ADC. It was sAndwicHed beTweEn two scinT
After reconstructing the p re-cluster s inthe  fo ur  pro ject ions, the fina l  (fu ll) cluster properties  arede t ermi n ed  by a dding t h ep r e-c lu st eren e rg ies a ndaveragi ng the coo rdi na tes of the p r e- cluster ce ntr es.

In case  of  moreth ano ne cl ust er pe r proj e ctionthe situa ti o n is m o re diff i c ul t, a s illustrated inf ig u re \[fig:twocl \]:

! [P r oj e c ted  vi ews of a t wo -clus t er even t .[ ] { d ata - label="fig:tw ocl"}](VLQf i g13 .eps){ wi dth = "14cm" }

Tw op art icles hitti ng t he calori meterl ead toe ight pr e-clus ter s f romw hi ch  fo ur clu s te rsc anbe recon st ru ctedso t h a t ther e i s no  uniq ue solution.Ifhowe v erthe t wo in cide nt  part iclesdepos it  clearly differ entamounts o f e ne rgy  i n the calori met er,  combin ing the low  e n e r gy  pre-clusters vers us t he  high en ergy o n es  a l lows a n on -am bigu o u s sol utio n .This met hod wi l lof  course  f ail if  t hepar ticle s  hav e simi lar ener gies. In this case n o  unique solut i on i sp ossi ble , and the d ecis i on n eeds to  be leftoverto th e  VLQ track detector  [ @Hurli ng].
The Calibrat ion Concep t = ======== ==== = == = ======

Test B eam C alibration -------- ----- -------- 

Both VL Q calorime ter  mo dul esw e re  tested in an e lect ro n testbea m at th e D eut sch esEl ektronen- Synchr ot ro nDE SYin Ha m burg. Th ebea m,  su pplie d  by th e DES Y sy nc hr o tro n, hade ne r g iesad ju stab lebe tween  1 a n d 6  GeV.
In the te sts etup ,th e VLQ m odule to be i nv estigatedwa s f ixed a t the movi ng mechanism constructe d  for op era tionin H 1. As thi s d evicesup p lies o nly ve rtica lmov e m ent,h o ri zon ta l displace m e nts  were  p erfo rmed on  a support table d r ive n by a step m oto r. T h e  v ert i ca l  an dh ori z o ntal displaceme nt steps w er e  5  mm each,c orr es ponding  to the  scin t illator  strip wi dth.

The  d ista n c e b etween bea m collim ator andc alori m et er mo dul e was5. 70m. Th e posi t ion  of t he bea min a v ertic al  plane i n front of the calorime ter wa s def ine d with th e h e lpof a sili contracker te les cop e. Th e t e lesco pe c o ns ist e d oftwod ensely pa c ke d b u n dl es, each eq u i p ped  with  fo u r Si s trip  detector planes. The strip orie ntat i o nswer e  y -  x  - y - x - x -  y-x - y. Eac hplane conta ined 384  S i  stri ps of50 $\m u$m wid t h .T he dis tanc e b etween th e l ay e rs insi de  o n e bund le w as  10 mm , thet wo b u n dles were 17 cmapart f rom e a chother .The cro s s se ction cove red by thetelesc opewas 2  x 2 cm $^ 2$. Th e S i- telecope was readout s equenti al ly b y a  6 - b it C A M AC AD C. I twas  sandwich e d  b e tw ee n  tw o sc int
After reconstructing_the pre-clusters_in the four projections,_the final_(full)_cluster properties_are_determined by adding_the pre-cluster energies_and averaging the coordinates_of the pre-cluster_centres.

In_case of more than one cluster per projection the situation is more difficult, as_illustrated_in figure_\[fig:twocl\]:

![Projected_views_of a two-cluster event.[]{data-label="fig:twocl"}](VLQfig13.eps){width="14cm"}

Two particles_hitting the calorimeter lead to_eight pre-clusters_from which four clusters can be reconstructed so_that_there is no_unique solution. If however the two incident particles deposit_clearly different amounts of energy in_the calorimeter, combining_the_low_energy pre-clusters versus the_high energy ones allows a non-ambiguous_solution. This method will of course_fail if the particles have similar energies._In this case no unique solution_is possible, and the decision_needs to_be left over to the_VLQ track detector_[@Hurling].

The Calibration_Concept
=======================

Test Beam Calibration
---------------------

Both_VLQ calorimeter modules were tested in_an electron test_beam at the Deutsches Elektronen -_Synchrotron_DESY in Hamburg._The_beam,_supplied by_the DESY synchrotron,_had_energies adjustable_between_1 and 6 GeV.

In the test_setup,_the VLQ module to be investigated was_fixed at the moving_mechanism_constructed for operation in_H1. As this device supplies_only vertical movement, horizontal displacements were_performed on_a support_table driven by a step motor. The vertical and horizontal displacement_steps were 5 mm each, corresponding_to the scintillator strip_width.

The distance_between_beam collimator and_calorimeter_module was_5.70 m. The position of the beam in_a vertical_plane in front of the calorimeter_was defined with the_help_of a silicon tracker telescope. The_telescope consisted of two densely packed_bundles, each equipped with four_Si_strip_detector planes. The strip orientations_were y - x - y_- x -_x - y - x - y._Each_plane contained 384 Si strips of_50_$\mu$m width. The distance between the_layers_inside_one bundle was 10 mm,_the two bundles were 17 cm_apart from each other. The cross section covered by_the telescope was_2 x 2 cm$^2$. The_Si_-_telecope was read out sequentially by a 6 - bit_CAMAC ADC._It was sandwiched_between two scint