[ kms$^{-1}$]{} were found in the SE region, including the region of our R1, R2, R9 and R13 for which HETGS data imply velocities between $-2500$ and $-1000$[ kms$^{-1}$]{}. This discrepancy is not too surprising. Although @hwang01 argued that they can ignore the ionization effects on the Si He$\alpha$ centroid to a reasonable approximation, they note that high spectral resolution measurements are more desirable to measure the energy shifts directly from resolved rather than blended lines. Indeed, their [*Chandra*]{} data do not resolve the Si XIII triplet, and even the Si XIV and Si XIII Ly$\alpha$ lines are not fully resolved, introducing some level of uncertainty in line centroid measurement. The most recent results from the 1 Ms Very Large Project (VLP) [*Chandra*]{} data show values more consistent with our HETGS data [@stage05], but even here absolute gain calibration accuracies for the CCD may only be good to 0.5% or 1500[ kms$^{-1}$]{}.

[*XMM*]{} Doppler maps of Si, S and Fe lines by @willingale02 show a smaller range in velocity than the Si velocity map of @hwang01 and, thus, values that are at a glance closer to our values in Table \[tab-hetg\]. The [*XMM*]{} data have been binned to a $20\arcsec
\times 20\arcsec$ spatial grid and the spectra were fit with two thermal NEI components representing the ejecta and the shocked component, each with a separate energy shift. The Doppler shift values derived in this way will depend on the ability of the NEI spectral model to predict the line blends combined with the uncertainties in the gain calibration of the detectors. In comparison to our results, it is obvious that some of the errors in their Doppler shift values are produced because of the spatial averaging over a variety of features with very different velocities. For example, in the NW region the Doppler velocity map of @willingale02 has a smooth distribution of red-shifted values with a 1000[ kms$^{-1}$]{} or so dispersion, whereas our regions R5 and R6 in that part of the SNR show significantly blue-shifted values of around $-1500$[ kms$^{-1}$]{}, as well as red-shifted velocities with 1000[ kms$^{-1}$]{} difference between regions R8 and R15
[   kms$^{-1}$ ] { }   were found in the SE region, including the region of our R1, R2, R9 and R13 for which HETGS datum entail velocities between $ -2500 $ and $ -1000 $ [   kms$^{-1}$ ] { }. This discrepancy is not too surprising. Although @hwang01 argue that they can neglect the ionization effects on the Si He$\alpha$ centroid to a reasonable estimate, they note that high spectral resolving power measurements are more desirable to measure the department of energy shifts directly from resolved rather than blend lines. Indeed, their [ * Chandra * ] { } data do not resolve the Si XIII triplet, and even the Si XIV and Si XIII Ly$\alpha$ credit line are not fully resolved, introducing some horizontal surface of uncertainty in line centroid measurement. The most recent consequence from the 1   Ms Very Large Project (VLP) [ * Chandra * ] { } data show values more consistent with our HETGS datum [ @stage05 ], but even here absolute gain calibration accuracies for the CCD may only be good to 0.5%   or 1500 [   kms$^{-1}$ ] { }. 

 [ * XMM * ] { } Doppler maps of Si, S and Fe lines by @willingale02 usher a smaller range in velocity than the Si velocity map of @hwang01 and, thus, values that are at a glance closer to our values in Table   \[tab - hetg\ ]. The [ * XMM * ] { } data have been bin to a $ 20\arcsec 
 \times 20\arcsec$ spatial power system and the spectra were fit with two thermal NEI components representing the ejecta and the aghast part, each with a separate energy shift. The Doppler shift values derived in this way will depend on the ability of the NEI apparitional model to predict the line blends combined with the uncertainties in the gain calibration of the detectors. In comparison to our results, it is obvious that some of the errors in their Doppler shift values are grow because of the spatial averaging over a variety of feature of speech with very different velocities. For example, in the NW region the Doppler velocity function of @willingale02 has a smooth distribution of red - shifted values with a 1000 [   kms$^{-1}$ ] { }   or so dispersion, whereas our regions R5 and R6 in that part of the SNR express significantly blasphemous - shifted values of about $ -1500 $ [   kms$^{-1}$ ] { }, as well as crimson - shifted speed with 1000 [   kms$^{-1}$ ] { }   difference between regions R8 and R15
[ kms$^{-1}$]{} aere found in the SE reglon, including thg eegion of oud R1, R2, R9 xnd R13 for which HETGS data ilpoy veoocities between $-2500$ and $-1000$[ yms$^{-1}$]{}. This fiscrepabcy ms not too surprmaing. Albkough @mwang01 ergued that thei can ignore the ionizatiot dfyects on the Si He$\alpha$ centroid to w reasomahle approximatyon, uher nofv uhat high spectral resolution meaauremenus are more desiranle to measure the energy dhifhs directly from rfsolved ratyer eyan blended uines. Indetd, their [*Chahdra*]{} data do not resolve the Si XIII triplet, abd evft the Si XIT and Fi XIII Ly$\alina$ linas are mot fully resokvev, inrroducing some level mf uncertainty in jine centsond measurement. The mowt recett rasulgw ffom tie 1 Js Verj Lerge Projecf (VLP) [*Chandea*]{} data show values mjgr consistent with juw HETGS data [@stage05], but even here absoluue gajn calibration accuraciws for the CCD may onpy be gooq to 0.5% or 1500[ kms$^{-1}$]{}.

[*XMM*]{} Doppler maps of Si, S and Fe lines ty @wimuinyqle02 sfiw a smaller range in velocity than the Si velosjtu kap of @hwang01 akd, thus, values thay wrr at a glance zloser to our values in Tabpe \[tab-hejg\]. The [*XMM*]{} data havr been binned to a $20\arcsec
\tines 20\arcsec$ siatiql grid and the spzctra were fnt witn two thermal NEI components repdesenting tje ejecta xnd the shocked zomionett, each with a separate enqrgy shifv. The Dopplef shoft vajues derivfd in this way will depejd on tve ability of the NEI spectral model to pcxdict the ling bnengs combiued wibh the uncertaigties in the gcin caliyratiov of the dvtectors. Mn comparisog to our resunjs, it is obvimus that somw of the erfurs in their Dpppler shpfu values aee produced becausc of jhs spatial averaynnt over a varietu ow fqanurxs wiev very diffesent veupcitids. For tramile, in yhe NW region the Do[pled velocity map of @eijlingale02 has a siooth distribition of red-shiftef valnes wivh a 1000[ kks$^{-1}$]{} ot so dispersion, whereas our regjons R5 anf R6 in that pare of the SNR shoc significantly blue-shifted values of ariund $-1500$[ kms$^{-1}$]{}, as well aw red-shifted velocijiex with 1000[ kms$^{-1}$]{} dmfferegce betwean regions R8 and R15
[ kms$^{-1}$]{} were found in the SE the of our R2, R9 and imply between $-2500$ and kms$^{-1}$]{}. This discrepancy not too surprising. Although @hwang01 argued they can ignore the ionization effects on the Si He$\alpha$ centroid to a approximation, they note that high spectral resolution measurements are more desirable to measure energy directly resolved than blended lines. Indeed, their [*Chandra*]{} data do not resolve the Si XIII triplet, and even Si XIV and Si XIII Ly$\alpha$ lines are fully resolved, introducing some of uncertainty in line centroid The recent results the Ms Large Project (VLP) data show values more consistent with our HETGS data [@stage05], but even here absolute gain calibration accuracies the CCD be good 0.5% 1500[ [*XMM*]{} Doppler maps S and Fe lines by @willingale02 range in velocity than the Si velocity map @hwang01 and, values that are at a glance to our values in Table \[tab-hetg\]. The [*XMM*]{} have been binned to a $20\arcsec \times 20\arcsec$ spatial grid and the spectra were fit thermal NEI components representing ejecta and the component, with separate shift. The shift values derived in this way will depend on the ability the NEI spectral model to predict the line blends combined uncertainties the gain calibration the detectors. In comparison our it is obvious that the in values produced of the spatial averaging a variety of features with different velocities. For example, Doppler velocity map of @willingale02 has a smooth of red-shifted values with a 1000[ kms$^{-1}$]{} so dispersion, whereas our regions R5 and R6 in that part of SNR show values of around $-1500$[ kms$^{-1}$]{}, as well as velocities with 1000[ kms$^{-1}$]{} between regions R8 and R15
[ kms$^{-1}$]{} were found in the SE region, Including tHe regIon Of oUr r1, R2, R9 aNd R13 fOr which HETGS daTA impLy velocities between $-2500$ and $-1000$[ Kms$^{-1}$]{}. ThIs DIscrEPaNcy is Not too sURpRISinG. ALtHouGh @HWaNg01 argUed That theY can ignore The IoNization effeCTs On the Si He$\aLphA$ centroid to a ReaSonablE aPprOXimatIon, They nOte thaT High spEctral resOlUTion meASuremenTS ArE morE desirable to measuRE tHE energy shifts dIrectlY fROm RESolVed Rather than BlEnded LInes. IndEEd, THEIr [*CHAndra*]{} data do noT resolve the sI XIiI tripLeT, anD Even thE Si XIv aND Si xIII Ly$\alpha$ LineS are not fuLly resOLved, intROducing Some leVel Of uNcerTAiNtY in LiNE ceNTrOid MEasUrement. THe MoSt recEnt rESULTs frOm tHe 1 Ms very LArge Project (VLp) [*ChAndrA*]{} DatA show ValueS morE cOnsisTent wiTh our hEtGS data [@stage05], but Even Here absolUte GaIn cAlIbratIOn accuRacIes For the CcD may onLY be GoOD TO 0.5% oR 1500[ kms$^{-1}$]{}.

[*XMM*]{} Doppler maps Of sI, s aNd Fe lineS by @wilLInGaLE02 show a smAlLer RangE IN veloCity THaN the Si veLocity MAp Of @Hwang01 anD, tHus, valUeS thAt aRe at a GLancE closeR to our vaLues iN table \[tab-hetg\]. ThE [*xMM*]{} data have beEN bINNeD To a $20\aRcsEc
\times 20\arcsEc$ spATial Grid ANd The SPectrA were FiT WiTH two thermal NEI compoNeNts repResenTing the ejecta And the shocKED ComponenT, eacH WiTH a separate enerGy shiFt. The DopplER shift vaLues dErived in This way wiLL Depend on The AbiLitY of THE NeI spectral modEL To prEdIct the lIne Blends cOmbIneD wiTh tHe UncertainTies in thE gAiN cAlIbrAtion OF the deteCtOrs. in ComParisON to our ResulTs, it Is ObVIouS that soME oF THe erRoRs In thEir doPpler ShifT ValUes are pRoduced beCauSE of tHe SpAtial avEraging over a vArIety of featUrEs wIth verY DIfferent Velocities. For example, in tHE NW regiOn tHe DopPler Velocity mAp oF @williNgaLE02 has a sMooth dIstriBuTioN OF red-sHIFtEd vAlUes with a 1000[ kmS$^{-1}$]{} OR so DispeRsIon, wHereas oUr regions R5 and R6 in thAT paRt of the SNR shoW siGnifICAnTly BLuE-ShiFtED vaLUEs of around $-1500$[ kms$^{-1}$]{}, as Well as red-sHiFTeD velocitieS WitH 1000[ kMs$^{-1}$]{} diffeRence beTween REgions R8 And R15
[ kms$^{-1}$]{} were found  in the SE  regi on,  in cl udin g th e region of ou r  R1,  R2, R9 and R13 for wh ich H ET G S da t aimply  veloci t ie s bet we en  $- 25 0 0$  and$-1 000$[ k ms$^{-1}$] {}.  T his discrepa n cy  is not to o s urprising. A lth ough @ hw ang 0 1 arg ued  that  theyc an ign ore the i on i zation effects o ntheSi He$\alpha$ cen t ro i d to a reasona ble ap pr o xi m a tio n,they noteth at hi g h spect r al r e sol u tion measurem ents are mo r e d esirab le  to measur e the  e n erg y shifts di rect ly from r esolve d  rather than bl endedlin es.  Ind e ed ,the ir [*C h an dra * ]{}  data do  n ot  reso lvet h e Si X III  tri plet,  and even the  Si  XIV and  Si X III L y$\a lp ha$ l ines a re no tfully resolved,  int roducingsom elev el  of u n certai nty  in  line c entroid mea su r e m en t. The most recent  r e s ul ts fromthe 1M sVe r y LargePr oje ct ( V L P) [* Chan d ra *]{} dat a show va lu es more  c onsist en t w ith  ourH ETGS  data[@stage0 5], b u t even here ab s olute gain ca l ib r a ti o n ac cur acies for t he C C D ma y on l ybeg ood t o 0.5 %o r1 500[ kms$^{-1}$]{}. 
[*XMM* ]{} D oppler maps o f Si, S an d F e linesby @ w il l ingale02 showa sma ller range in veloc ity t han theSi veloci t y  map of@hw ang 01and , th us, values th a t  are  a t a gla nce  closer  to  ou r v alu es  in Table  \[tab-h et g\ ].  T he[*XMM * ]{} data  h ave  b een  binn e d to a  $20\ arcs ec 
\ t ime s 20\ar c se c $  spa ti al  gri d a nd  thespec t rawere fi t with tw o t h erma lNE I compo nents represe nt ing the ej ec taand th e shockedcomponent, each with as eparate  en ergyshif t. The Do ppl er shi ftv aluesderive d inth isw a y wil l de pen don the abi l i tyof th eNEIspectra l model to predict the  line blendscom bine d wi tht he unc er t ain t i es in the gaincalibratio no fthe detect o rs.  I n compa rison t o our results , it is o bvious th at  som e ofthe errors  in thei r Doppler shift va luesare  produ ce d b ecaus e of t h e s patia l aver ag ing ov er ava riety of  features with very dif ferent  velo cit ies. Forexa m ple , in theNW r egion theDop ple r vel oci t y map  of@ wi lli n gale0 2 ha s  a smooth di str i b ut ion of red- s h i fte d val ues with a  100 0[ kms$^{-1}$]{}o r so dispersio n, w h e rea s o u r re gi ons R5 and R6inth a t  part of  t he SNR show  signifi ca n tly b lue-sh iftedvalueso f  a r ound $ -150 0$[  kms$^{-1 }$] {} ,  as wel las red-sh ifte dveloci ties w i th 1 0 0 0[ kms$^{-1}$]{}  diff e r enceb etw een r eg ions R8 andR15
[ kms$^{-1}$]{} were found_in the_SE region, including the_region of_our_R1, R2,_R9_and R13 for_which HETGS data_imply velocities between $-2500$_and $-1000$[ kms$^{-1}$]{}. This_discrepancy_is not too surprising. Although @hwang01 argued that they can ignore the ionization effects_on_the Si_He$\alpha$_centroid_to a reasonable approximation, they_note that high spectral resolution_measurements are_more desirable to measure the energy shifts directly_from_resolved rather than_blended lines. Indeed, their [*Chandra*]{} data do not resolve_the Si XIII triplet, and even_the Si XIV_and_Si_XIII Ly$\alpha$ lines are_not fully resolved, introducing some level_of uncertainty in line centroid measurement._The most recent results from the 1 Ms_Very Large Project (VLP) [*Chandra*]{} data_show values more consistent with_our HETGS_data [@stage05], but even here_absolute gain calibration_accuracies for_the CCD may_only be good to 0.5% or 1500[ kms$^{-1}$]{}.

[*XMM*]{}_Doppler maps of_Si, S and Fe lines by_@willingale02_show a smaller_range_in_velocity than_the Si velocity_map_of @hwang01_and,_thus, values that are at a_glance_closer to our values in Table \[tab-hetg\]. The_[*XMM*]{} data have been_binned_to a $20\arcsec
\times 20\arcsec$_spatial grid and the spectra_were fit with two thermal NEI_components representing_the ejecta_and the shocked component, each with a separate energy shift. The_Doppler shift values derived in this_way will depend on_the ability_of_the NEI spectral_model_to predict_the line blends combined with the uncertainties_in the_gain calibration of the detectors. In_comparison to our results,_it_is obvious that some of the_errors in their Doppler shift values_are produced because of the_spatial_averaging_over a variety of features_with very different velocities. For example,_in the NW_region the Doppler velocity map of @willingale02_has_a smooth distribution of red-shifted values_with_a 1000[ kms$^{-1}$]{} or so dispersion, whereas our_regions_R5_and R6 in that part_of the SNR show significantly blue-shifted_values of around $-1500$[ kms$^{-1}$]{}, as well as red-shifted velocities_with 1000[ kms$^{-1}$]{} difference between_regions R8 and R15