 energy density of the gas of light particles. This interpretation is in fact the usual one in quantum electrodynamics [@qed], where unsuppressed loop corrections to the total energy density $\rho$ (at temperatures well below the electron mass) are attributed to self-interactions among photons that arise after integrating the electron-positron field out of the functional integral. Recently, this point of view has been investigated in detail by Braaten and Jia [@bj] for the original MY model. They show that, after integrating out the heavy $\varphi$ field to get an effective theory of the light $\chi$ field alone, the $T^6/M^2$ term in $\rho_\varphi$ is obtained as the thermal expectation value of a particular higher-dimensional operator in the hamiltonian of the effective theory. However, the coefficient of this operator can be changed to any value (including zero) by a field redefinition. This shows that no physical significance can be attached to the $T^6/M^2$ term in $\rho_\varphi$.

We therefore conclude that the QBE for WIMP relic densities should not be corrected in the manner proposed by MY. However, we should keep in mind that the theoretical situation is not as clear as we might like it to be, and so be on the lookout for possible further surprises.

I thank Anupam Singh and Scott Thomas for discussions, and Motohiko Yoshimura for correspondence. I also thank Gary Steigman for bringing ref. [@bj] to my belated attention. This work was supported in part by the National Science Foundation through grant PHY–97–22022, and by the Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics through grant 920.

J. Rau and B. Müller, Phys. Rep. [**272**]{}, 1 (1996), nucl-th/9505009.

Sh. Matsumoto and M. Yoshimura, Phys. Rev. D [**59**]{}, 123511 (1999), hep-ph/9811301; Phys. Rev. D [**61**]{}, 123508 (2000), hep-ph/9910393; Phys. Rev. D [**61**]{}, 123509 (2000), hep-ph/9910425.

A. Singh and M. Srednicki, Phys. Rev. D [**61**]{}, 023509 (2000), hep-ph/9908224.

A. O. Cal
energy density of the gas of light particle. This rendition is in fact the usual one in quantum electrodynamics [ @qed ], where unsuppressed loop correction to the full energy density $ \rho$ (at temperature well below the electron mass) are assign to self - interactions among photon that rebel after integrating the electron - positron playing field out of the functional integral. Recently, this point of opinion has been investigated in detail by Braaten and Jia [ @bj ] for the original MY model. They show that, after integrating out the heavy $ \varphi$ battlefield to get an effective theory of the light $ \chi$ playing field alone, the $ T^6 / M^2 $ term in $ \rho_\varphi$ is obtained as the thermal expectation value of a especial higher - dimensional operator in the hamiltonian of the effective theory. However, the coefficient of this operator can be changed to any value (include zero) by a field redefinition. This shows that no physical significance can be attached to the $ T^6 / M^2 $ term in $ \rho_\varphi$. 

 We therefore conclude that the QBE for WIMP relic densities should not be corrected in the manner proposed by MY. However, we should keep in mind that the theoretical situation is not as clear as we might wish it to be, and thus be on the lookout for possible further surprise. 

 I thank Anupam Singh and Scott Thomas for discussions, and Motohiko Yoshimura for correspondence. I also thank Gary Steigman for bringing referee.   [ @bj ] to my belated attention. This workplace was supported in part by the National Science Foundation through concession PHY–97–22022, and by the Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics through grant 920. 

 J. Rau and B. Müller, Phys. Rep. [ * * 272 * * ] { }, 1 (1996), nucl - th/9505009. 

 Sh. Matsumoto and M. Yoshimura, Phys. Rev. D [ * * 59 * * ] { }, 123511 (1999), hep - ph/9811301; Phys. Rev. D [ * * 61 * * ] { }, 123508 (2000), hep - ph/9910393; Phys. Rev. D [ * * 61 * * ] { }, 123509 (2000), hep - ph/9910425. 

 A. Singh and M. Srednicki, Phys. Rev. D [ * * 61 * * ] { }, 023509 (2000), hep - ph/9908224. 

 A. O. Cal
 enfrgy density of the gas uf light particles. Thiv intedpretatiun is in fact the usual one mn qyantun electrodynamics [@qed], dhere unslppressed look corrections to vge total enerfn denvmty $\rho$ (at tempgratures weln below the elacgrln mass) are attributed to self-interwctions along photons trat swise after integrating the electron-posjtron fpeld out of the finctional integral. Recentlj, thls point of view hws been invgatidqted in detakl by Braaueu and Jia [@bn] for the original MY model. Theh shoc that, aftet jnhggrating out the reavy $\varphi$ field tm get am effective thcory mf rhe light $\chi$ field anone, the $T^6/M^2$ term ig $\rho_\varpvi$ is obtained as tye therkal axpezratkon velus of a pacticular hifher-dimensiinal operator in tht hwniltonian of fhe efsestive theory. However, the coefficient of thjs operator can be chanted to any value (incloding zero) by a field redefinition. This shows that no physiwal smgvifngwvxe can be attached to the $T^6/M^2$ term in $\rho_\varphi$.

Wq tnegefore conclude tmat the QBE for WIKP rrjic densities shoulb nkt be corrected in the magner proposed fy MU. However, we should keep in mind that tke rheoretical situatnon is not ar clgar as we might like it to be, and so be on tje lookouf for possible fufthvr sgrprises.

I thank Anupam Sindh and Scitt Chomas fur doscussyons, and Mltohiko Yoshimura for cogresplngence. I aldo thank Gary Steigman for brinjmng ref. [@bj] to ky benated atcentiok. This work was supported in kart by tke Natkonal Sciehce Fouidation throtgh grant PHY–97–22022, wnd by the Iistitute jf Gwophtsics ava Planetary Phusics through grant 920.

J. Rau and B. Müller, Phis. Rep. [**272**]{}, 1 (1996), nucl-th/9505009.

Sk. Natsumoto and M. Yorhiiuga, 'hys. Wav. D [**59**]{}, 123511 (1999), hep-pv/9811301; Phhs. Frv. D [**61**]{}, 123508 (2000), hep-ph/9910393; Phns. Fev. C [**61**]{}, 123509 (2000), hep-ph/9910425.

A. Singh ang M. Arednicki, Phys. Rev. D [**61**]{}, 023509 (2000), hep-py/9908224.

A. O. Cal
energy density of the gas of light interpretation in fact usual one in loop to the total density $\rho$ (at well below the electron mass) are to self-interactions among photons that arise after integrating the electron-positron field out of functional integral. Recently, this point of view has been investigated in detail by and [@bj] the MY model. They show that, after integrating out the heavy $\varphi$ field to get an effective of the light $\chi$ field alone, the $T^6/M^2$ in $\rho_\varphi$ is obtained the thermal expectation value of particular operator in hamiltonian the theory. However, the of this operator can be changed to any value (including zero) by a field redefinition. This shows no physical be attached the term $\rho_\varphi$. We therefore the QBE for WIMP relic densities corrected in the manner proposed by MY. However, should keep mind that the theoretical situation is as clear as we might like it to and so be on the lookout for possible further surprises. I thank Anupam Singh and for discussions, and Motohiko for correspondence. I thank Steigman bringing [@bj] to belated attention. This work was supported in part by the National Foundation through grant PHY–97–22022, and by the Institute of Geophysics Physics grant 920. J. and B. Müller, Phys. [**272**]{}, (1996), nucl-th/9505009. Sh. Matsumoto Yoshimura, Rev. (1999), Phys. D [**61**]{}, 123508 (2000), Phys. Rev. D [**61**]{}, 123509 hep-ph/9910425. A. Singh and [**61**]{}, 023509 (2000), hep-ph/9908224. A. O. Cal
 energy density of the gas of liGht particlEs. ThiS inTerPrEtatIon iS in fact the usuaL One iN quantum electrodynamicS [@qed], wHeRE unsUPpResseD loop coRReCTIonS tO tHe tOtAL eNergy DenSity $\rho$ (At temperatUreS wEll below the eLEcTron mass) arE atTributed to seLf-iNteracTiOns AMong pHotOns thAt arisE After iNtegratinG tHE electROn-positRON fIeld Out of the functionaL InTEgral. Recently, tHis poiNt OF vIEW haS beEn investigAtEd in dETail by BRAaTEN And jIa [@bj] for the oriGinal MY modeL. theY show tHaT, afTEr inteGratiNg OUt tHe heavy $\varpHi$ fiEld to get aN effecTIve theoRY of the lIght $\chI$ fiEld AlonE, ThE $T^6/m^2$ teRm IN $\rhO_\VaRphI$ Is oBtained aS tHe ThermAl exPECTAtioN vaLue oF a parTicular higher-DimEnsiONal OperaTor in The hAmIltonIan of tHe effEcTive theory. HowevEr, thE coefficiEnt Of ThiS oPeratOR can be ChaNgeD to any vAlue (incLUdiNg ZERO) bY a field redefinitioN. THIS sHows that No physICaL sIGnificanCe Can Be atTAChed tO the $t^6/m^2$ tErm in $\rho_\Varphi$.

wE tHeRefore cOnClude tHaT thE QBe for WimP reLic denSities shOuld nOT be corrected in THe manner propoSEd BY mY. hOwevEr, wE should keep In miND thaT the THeOreTIcal sItuatIoN Is NOt as clear as we might lIkE it to bE, and sO be on the lookoUt for possiBLE Further sUrprISeS.

i thank Anupam SiNgh anD Scott ThomAS for discUssioNs, and MotOhiko YoshIMUra for coRreSpoNdeNce. i ALsO thank Gary SteIGMan fOr BringinG reF. [@bj] to my BelAteD atTenTiOn. This worK was suppOrTeD iN pArt By the nAtional SCiEncE FOunDatioN ThrougH granT PHY–97–22022, AnD bY The instituTE oF gEophYsIcS and plaNeTary PHysiCS thRough grAnt 920.

J. Rau anD B. MÜLler, phYs. rep. [**272**]{}, 1 (1996), nucl-Th/9505009.

Sh. Matsumoto AnD M. YoshimurA, PHys. rev. D [**59**]{}, 123511 (1999), heP-PH/9811301; Phys. Rev. d [**61**]{}, 123508 (2000), hep-ph/9910393; Phys. Rev. D [**61**]{}, 123509 (2000), hep-ph/9910425.

A. SinGH and M. SrEdnIcki, PHys. REv. D [**61**]{}, 023509 (2000), hep-ph/9908224.

A. o. CaL
 energy density of the gas  of lightparti cle s.Th is i nter pretation is i n  fac t the usual one in qua ntumel e ctro d yn amics  [@qed] ,  w h e reun su ppr es s ed  loop  co rrectio ns to thetot al  energy dens i ty  $\rho$ (a t t emperatureswel l belo wthe elect ron  mass ) area ttribu ted to se lf - intera c tions a m o ng  pho tons that arise a f te r  integrating t he ele ct r on - p osi tro n field ou tof th e  functi o na l i nte g ral. Recently , this poin t  of  viewha s b e en inv estig at e d i n detail by  Bra aten andJia [@ b j] fort he orig inal M Y m ode l. T h ey  s how  t h at, af ter int egrating  o ut  theheav y $ \ varp hi$  fie ld to  get an effec tiv e th e ory  of t he li ght$\ chi$fieldalone ,the $T^6/M^2$ t ermin $\rho_ \va rp hi$  i s obt a ined a s t hethermal  expect a tio nv a l ue  of a particular h ig h e r- dimensio nal op e ra to r  in theha mil toni a n  of t he e f fe ctive th eory.H ow ev er, the  c oeffic ie ntofthiso pera tor ca n be cha ngedt o any value (i n cluding zero) by a  f i eldred efinition.This show s th a tnop hysic al si gn i fi c ance can be attache dto the  $T^6 /M^2$ term in  $\rho_\va r p h i$.

Wether e fo r e conclude tha t the  QBE for W I MP relic  dens ities sh ould notb e  correct edinthe  ma n n er  proposed byM Y . Ho we ver, we  sh ould ke epinmin d t ha t the the oretical  s it ua ti onis no t  as clea raswe  mi ght l i ke itto be , an dso beon thel oo k o ut f or  p ossi ble  f urthe r su r pri ses.

I  thank An upa m  Sin gh  a nd Scot t Thomas fordi scussions,  a ndMotohi k o  Yoshimu ra for correspondence.I  also t han k Gar y St eigman fo r b ringin g r e f. [@b j] tomy be la ted a ttent i o n.  Th is  work wass u ppo rtedin  par t by th e National Science Fou ndation throu ghgran t PH Y–9 7 –2 2 022 ,a ndb y  the Instituteof Geophys ic s  a nd Planeta r y P hy sics th rough g rant9 20.

J.  Rau andB. Müller ,Phys . Rep . [**272** ]{}, 1 ( 1996), nu c l-th/ 9 50 5009. 

S h. Mat su mot o and  M. Yo s him ura,Phys.Re v. D [ **59* *] {}, 1235 11 (1999), hep-ph/98113 01; Ph ys. R ev.  D [**61* *]{ } , 1 23508 (20 00),  hep-ph/99 103 93;  Phys . R e v. D[**6 1 ** ]{} ,  1235 09 ( 2 000), hep - ph /99 1 0 42 5.

A. Sing h a ndM. Sr edn i cki, P hys.  Rev. D [**61**]{ } , 023509 (2000 ), h e p -ph /99 0 8224 .
A. O. Cal
 energy_density of_the gas of light_particles. This_interpretation_is in_fact_the usual one_in quantum electrodynamics_[@qed], where unsuppressed loop_corrections to the_total_energy density $\rho$ (at temperatures well below the electron mass) are attributed to self-interactions_among_photons that_arise_after_integrating the electron-positron field out_of the functional integral. Recently,_this point_of view has been investigated in detail by_Braaten_and Jia [@bj]_for the original MY model. They show that, after_integrating out the heavy $\varphi$ field_to get an_effective_theory_of the light $\chi$_field alone, the $T^6/M^2$ term in_$\rho_\varphi$ is obtained as the thermal_expectation value of a particular higher-dimensional operator_in the hamiltonian of the effective_theory. However, the coefficient of_this operator_can be changed to any_value (including zero)_by a_field redefinition. This_shows that no physical significance can_be attached to_the $T^6/M^2$ term in $\rho_\varphi$.

We therefore_conclude_that the QBE_for_WIMP_relic densities_should not be_corrected_in the_manner_proposed by MY. However, we should_keep_in mind that the theoretical situation is_not as clear as_we_might like it to_be, and so be on_the lookout for possible further surprises.

I_thank Anupam_Singh and_Scott Thomas for discussions, and Motohiko Yoshimura for correspondence. I also_thank Gary Steigman for bringing ref. [@bj]_to my belated attention._This work_was_supported in part_by_the National_Science Foundation through grant PHY–97–22022, and by_the Institute_of Geophysics and Planetary Physics through_grant 920.

J. Rau and_B._Müller, Phys. Rep. [**272**]{}, 1 (1996),_nucl-th/9505009.

Sh. Matsumoto and M. Yoshimura, Phys._Rev. D [**59**]{}, 123511 (1999),_hep-ph/9811301;_Phys._Rev. D [**61**]{}, 123508 (2000),_hep-ph/9910393; Phys. Rev. D [**61**]{}, 123509_(2000), hep-ph/9910425.

A. Singh_and M. Srednicki, Phys. Rev. D [**61**]{},_023509_(2000), hep-ph/9908224.

A. O. Cal