 the same BaSTI isochrones used here, with the masses and radii determined for the components of the cluster eclipsing binary WOCS 23009.

![ *(Upper panel:)* Fit of theoretical isochrones \[1.95 Gyr, $(m-M)_0=11.99$, $E(B-V)$=0.18 and 2.55 Gyr, $(m-M)_0=11.77$, $E(B-V)$=0.16\] to the cluster MS in the $m_{\rm  F606W}$-$(m_{\rm F606W} -  m_{\rm F814W})$ CMD (see text for details). *(Lower panel:)* Fit of WD isochrones to the observed CS, for the same age-distance-reddening combinations. Solid lines denote DA WDs, dotted lines DB objects. \[thCMDs\] ](f3.ps){width="89mm"}

The upper panel of Fig. \[thCMDs\] shows the result of the isochrone fits, with the two isochrones that best bracket the MSTO region, i.e., 1.95Gyr \[for $(m-M)_0=11.99$ and $E(B-V)$=0.18\] and 2.55Gyr \[for $(m-M)_0=11.77$ and $E(B-V)$=0.16\], respectively. WD isochrones (for both DA and DB objects) with the same age-distance-reddening combinations are displayed in the lower panel of the same figure. Notice how the termination of the DB sequence is brighter than that for the DA WDs, contrary to the result for typical globular cluster ages, because in this regime He-envelope WDs cool down more slowly that the H-envelope counterparts (see, e.g., Salaris et al. 2010). To compare WD and MSTO ages we have used the completeness corrected WD LF, and matched with theoretical WD LFs of varying age the observed cut-off of the star counts. The observed LF –see points with error bars in Fig. \[thLFs\]– exhibits just one peak and a cut-off (at $m_{\rm F606W}$=26.050$\pm$0.0.075 at its faint end, as expected for a standard cluster CS. Theoretical
the same BaSTI isochrones used here, with the masses and radius determine for the components of the cluster eclipsing binary WOCS   23009. 

! [ * (Upper gore :) * Fit of theoretical isochrones \[1.95   Gyr, $ (m - M)_0=11.99 $, $ E(B - V)$=0.18 and 2.55   Gyr, $ (m - M)_0=11.77 $, $ E(B - V)$=0.16\ ] to the bunch MS in the $ m_{\rm   F606W}$-$(m_{\rm F606W } -   m_{\rm F814W})$ CMD (see text for details). * (broken panel :) * Fit of WD isochrones to the observed CS, for the like age - distance - reddening combinations. Solid line denote DA WDs, dotted lines DB objects. \[thCMDs\ ] ] (f3.ps){width="89 mm " } 

 The upper jury of Fig.   \[thCMDs\ ] shows the result of the isochrone fits, with the two isochrone that best bracket the MSTO region, i.e., 1.95Gyr \[for $ (m - M)_0=11.99 $ and $ E(B - V)$=0.18\ ] and 2.55Gyr \[for $ (megabyte - M)_0=11.77 $ and $ E(B - V)$=0.16\ ], respectively. WD isochrones (for both DA and DB object) with the same age - distance - reddening combinations are displayed in the low panel of the same figure. Notice how the termination of the DB succession is bright than that for the DA WDs, contrary to the result for typical globular cluster ages, because in this regime He - envelope WDs cool down more slowly that the H - envelope counterparts (attend, e.g., Salaris et al.   2010). To compare WD and MSTO ages we have use the completeness correct WD LF, and matched with theoretical WD LFs of vary age the observed cut - off of the star count. The observed LF – see points with error bars in Fig.   \[thLFs\ ] – exhibits precisely one peak and a cut - off (at $ m_{\rm F606W}$=26.050$\pm$0.0.075 at its faint end, as ask for a standard bunch CS. Theoretical
 thf same BaSTI isochrones msed here, with tkw massxs and dadii degermined for the components lf the xluster eclipsing binafy WOCS 23009.

![ *(Uiper paneo:)* Fiu of theoretical maochroncf \[1.95 Gyd, $(m-M)_0=11.99$, $Z(B-T)$=0.18 and 2.55 Gyr, $(m-M)_0=11.77$, $E(B-Y)$=0.16\] to the clgster MS in tha $o_{\rl  F606W}$-$(m_{\rm F606W} -  m_{\rm F814W})$ CMD (see text fjr detaold). *(Lower panel:)* Sit ps WD psichrones to the observed CS, fkr the vame age-distamce-reddening combinations. Dolif lines denote DA ADs, dotted oinef DB objects. \[ghCMDs\] ](f3.ps){width="89mm"}

The ukper panel of Fig. \[thCMDs\] shows thd resblt of the usichgmne fits, wivh the two isochrokvs that best btacket the MSTP rxgiob, i.e., 1.95Gyr \[for $(m-M)_0=11.99$ and $E(U-V)$=0.18\] and 2.55Gyr \[for $(m-M)_0=11.77$ anq $E(B-V)$=0.16\], res[eetively. WD isochrones (fir bojh DA and EB ubjtctx) sith tje aame age-diatance-reddebing combinations ate eisplayed in fhe lorew panel of the same figure. Notice how tve fermination of the DB swquence is brighter tjan that sor the DA WDs, contrary to the result for typical globnlxr eoustef ahes, because in this regime He-envelope WDs cooj dpwk more slowly thct the H-envelope clumjerparts (see, e.e., Salaxjs et al. 2010). To compare AD and ISTO qges we hwve ised the completeness correxted WD LF, aud natched with theorztical WD LFr of varyong age the observed cuc-off or the star founts. Ths observed LF –see popnts with error bars in Fig. \[thLSs\]– exhibivs juxt one oeak and a cut-off (at $m_{\rm N606F}$=26.050$\pm$0.0.075 at its faint ejd, as efpected fog a standard cluster CS. Theoretmral
the same BaSTI isochrones used here, with and determined for components of the ![ panel:)* Fit of isochrones \[1.95 Gyr, $E(B-V)$=0.18 and 2.55 Gyr, $(m-M)_0=11.77$, $E(B-V)$=0.16\] the cluster MS in the $m_{\rm F606W}$-$(m_{\rm F606W} - m_{\rm F814W})$ CMD (see for details). *(Lower panel:)* Fit of WD isochrones to the observed CS, for same combinations. lines DA WDs, dotted lines DB objects. \[thCMDs\] ](f3.ps){width="89mm"} The upper panel of Fig. \[thCMDs\] shows the of the isochrone fits, with the two isochrones best bracket the MSTO i.e., 1.95Gyr \[for $(m-M)_0=11.99$ and and \[for $(m-M)_0=11.77$ $E(B-V)$=0.16\], WD (for both DA DB objects) with the same age-distance-reddening combinations are displayed in the lower panel of the same figure. how the the DB is than for the DA to the result for typical globular in this regime He-envelope WDs cool down more that the counterparts (see, e.g., Salaris et al. To compare WD and MSTO ages we have the completeness corrected WD LF, and matched with theoretical WD LFs of varying age the of the star counts. observed LF –see with bars Fig. exhibits just peak and a cut-off (at $m_{\rm F606W}$=26.050$\pm$0.0.075 at its faint end, expected for a standard cluster CS. Theoretical
 the same BaSTI isochrones useD here, with tHe masSes And RaDii dEterMined for the comPOnenTs of the cluster eclipsinG binaRy woCS 23009.

![ *(UPPeR paneL:)* Fit of tHEoRETicAl IsOchRoNEs \[1.95 gyr, $(m-M)_0=11.99$, $e(B-V)$=0.18 And 2.55 Gyr, $(m-m)_0=11.77$, $E(B-V)$=0.16\] to the cLusTeR MS in the $m_{\rm  F606w}$-$(M_{\rM F606W} -  m_{\rm F814W})$ CMd (seE text for detaIls). *(lower pAnEl:)* FIT of WD IsoChronEs to thE ObservEd CS, for thE sAMe age-dIStance-rEDDeNing Combinations. Solid LInES denote DA WDs, doTted liNeS dB OBJecTs. \[tHCMDs\] ](f3.ps){wiDtH="89mm"}

ThE Upper paNEl OF fIg. \[tHcMDs\] shows the rEsult of the iSOchRone fiTs, WitH The two IsochRoNEs tHat best bracKet tHe MSTO regIon, i.e., 1.95GYR \[for $(m-M)_0=11.99$ aND $E(B-V)$=0.18\] and 2.55gyr \[for $(M-M)_0=11.77$ aNd $E(b-V)$=0.16\], reSPeCtIveLy. wd isOChRonES (foR both DA aNd dB ObjecTs) wiTH THE samE agE-disTance-Reddening combInaTionS Are DisplAyed iN the LoWer paNel of tHe samE fIgure. Notice how tHe teRmination Of tHe dB sEqUence IS brighTer ThaN that foR the DA WdS, coNtRARY tO the result for typicAl GLObUlar clusTer ageS, BeCaUSe in this ReGimE He-eNVElope wDs cOOl Down more Slowly THaT tHe H-enveLoPe counTeRpaRts (See, e.g., sAlarIs et al. 2010). to comparE WD anD mSTO ages we have USed the completENeSS CoRRectEd Wd LF, and matchEd wiTH theOretICaL WD lfs of vAryinG aGE tHE observed cut-off of thE sTar couNts. ThE observed LF –seE points witH ERRor bars iN Fig. \[THLfS\]– exhibits just oNe peaK and a cut-ofF (At $m_{\rm F606W}$=26.050$\pM$0.0.075 at itS faint enD, as expectED For a stanDarD clUstEr Cs. tHeOretical
 the same BaSTI isochrones  used here , wit h t hema sses  and  radii determi n ed f or the components of t he cl us t er e c li psing  binary WO C S  23 00 9. 

! [* (U pperpan el:)* F it of theo ret ic al isochrone s  \ [1.95 Gyr,  $( m-M)_0=11.99 $,$E(B-V )$ =0. 1 8 and  2. 55 Gy r, $(m - M)_0=1 1.77$, $E (B - V)$=0. 1 6\] tot h eclus ter MS in the $m_ { \r m   F606W}$-$(m_ {\rm F 60 6 W} -   m _{\ rm F814W}) $CMD ( s ee text fo r d eta i ls). *(Lowerpanel:)* Fi t  of  WD is oc hro n es tothe o bs e rve d CS, for t he s ame age-d istanc e -redden i ng comb inatio ns.  So lidl in es  de no t e D A  W Ds, dot ted line sDB  obje cts. \ [ t hCMD s\]  ](f 3.ps) {width="89mm" }
Theu ppe r pan el of  Fig .\[thC MDs\]shows  t he result of th e is ochrone f its ,wit hthe t w o isoc hro nes  that b est bra c ket  t h e MS TO region, i.e., 1 .9 5 G yr  \[for $ (m-M)_ 0 =1 1. 9 9$ and $ E( B-V )$=0 . 1 8\] a nd 2 . 55 Gyr \[fo r $(m- M )_ 0= 11.77$an d $E(B -V )$= 0.1 6\],r espe ctivel y. WD is ochro n es (for both D A  and DB objec t s) w it h  the  sa me age-dist ance - redd enin g  c omb i natio ns ar ed is p layed in the lowerpa nel of  thesame figure.Notice how t h e termin atio n  o f  the DB sequen ce is  brightert han that  forthe DA W Ds, contr a r y to the  re sul t f ort y pi cal globularc l uste rages, b eca use inthi s r egi meHe -envelope  WDs coo ldo wn  m ore  slow l y that t he  H- en vel ope c o unterp arts(see ,e. g .,Salaris et a l. 2 01 0) . To  co mp are W D an d  MS TO ages  we haveuse d  the  c om pletene ss correctedWD  LF, and m at che d with t heoretic al WD LFs of varying ag e  the ob ser ved c ut-o ff of the  st ar cou nts .  The o bserve d LF–s eep o intsw i th  er ro r bars inF i g.\[thL Fs \]–exhibit s just one peak an d  acut-off (at $ m_{ \rmF 6 06 W}$ = 26 . 050 $\ p m$0 . 0 .075 at its fai nt end, as  e x pe cted for a sta nd ard clu ster CS . The o retical 
 the_same BaSTI_isochrones used here, with_the masses_and_radii determined_for_the components of_the cluster eclipsing_binary WOCS 23009.

![ *(Upper panel:)*_Fit of theoretical_isochrones_\[1.95 Gyr, $(m-M)_0=11.99$, $E(B-V)$=0.18 and 2.55 Gyr, $(m-M)_0=11.77$, $E(B-V)$=0.16\] to the cluster MS in the $m_{\rm__F606W}$-$(m_{\rm F606W}_-__m_{\rm F814W})$ CMD (see text_for details). *(Lower panel:)* Fit_of WD_isochrones to the observed CS, for the same_age-distance-reddening_combinations. Solid lines_denote DA WDs, dotted lines DB objects. \[thCMDs\] ](f3.ps){width="89mm"}

The_upper panel of Fig. \[thCMDs\] shows the_result of the_isochrone_fits,_with the two isochrones_that best bracket the MSTO region,_i.e., 1.95Gyr \[for $(m-M)_0=11.99$ and $E(B-V)$=0.18\]_and 2.55Gyr \[for $(m-M)_0=11.77$ and $E(B-V)$=0.16\], respectively._WD isochrones (for both DA and_DB objects) with the same_age-distance-reddening combinations_are displayed in the lower_panel of the_same figure._Notice how the_termination of the DB sequence is_brighter than that_for the DA WDs, contrary to_the_result for typical_globular_cluster_ages, because_in this regime_He-envelope_WDs cool_down_more slowly that the H-envelope counterparts_(see,_e.g., Salaris et al. 2010). To compare WD_and MSTO ages we_have_used the completeness corrected_WD LF, and matched with_theoretical WD LFs of varying age_the observed_cut-off of_the star counts. The observed LF –see points with error bars_in Fig. \[thLFs\]– exhibits just one peak_and a cut-off (at_$m_{\rm F606W}$=26.050$\pm$0.0.075_at_its faint end,_as_expected for_a standard cluster CS. Theoretical