) 463\] \[Nuovo Cim. B [**44**]{} (1966) 1\]. E. Poisson, *A Relativist’s Toolkit*, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge U.K. (2004)

V. Balasubramanian and S. F. Ross, Phys. Rev. D [**61**]{} (2000) 044007 \[hep-th/9906226\]. T. Banks, M. R. Douglas, G. T. Horowitz and E. J. Martinec, hep-th/9808016. V. Keranen and P. Kleinert, JHEP [**1504**]{} (2015) 119 \[arXiv:1412.2806 \[hep-th\]\].

[^1]: Note that there is an ambiguity in the literature related to the sign of $K_{ij}$. For example [@Poisson] defines $K_{ij}$ with an opposite sign. In this case the sign ambguity does not matter, but can cause confusion when the energy-momentum of the joining hypersurface is non-zero.

[^2]: Here we use the term *velocity* to denote a derivative of the coordinates of the geodesic with respect to the proper length of the geodesic. Although these quantities are not velocities in the physical sense, they appear in the geodesic equations in the same fashion as actual velocities would for time-like geodesics.
 ---
abstract: 'Motion of many comets is affected by non-gravitational forces caused by outgassing from their surfaces. Outgassing also produces reactive torques resulting in cometary spin evolution. We propose that the two processes are correlated and show that the change of cometary spin rate over its heliocentric orbit scales linearly with the amplitude of its non-gravitational acceleration. The proportionality constant depends on the comet size and orbital elements (semi-major axis and eccentricity) and on the (dimensionless) lever arm parameter $\zeta$ that relates the outgassing-induced torque and acceleration. We determine $\zeta$ for 7 comets for which both non-gravitational acceleration and change of spin period $\Delta P$ were measured and verify this relation. This sample spanning almost 4 decades in $\Delta P$ yields $\log\zeta=-2.21\pm 0.54$, surprisingly small value and spread. We then apply our framework to 209 comets with measured non
) 463\ ] \[Nuovo Cim.   B [ * * 44 * * ] { } (1966) 1\ ]. E. Poisson, * A Relativist ’s Toolkit *, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge U.K. (2004) 

 V.   Balasubramanian and S.   F.   Ross, Phys.   Rev.   D [ * * 61 * * ] { } (2000) 044007 \[hep - th/9906226\ ]. T.   Banks, M.   R.   Douglas, G.   T.   Horowitz and E.   J.   Martinec, hep - th/9808016. V.   Keranen and P.   Kleinert, JHEP [ * * 1504 * * ] { } (2015) 119 \[arXiv:1412.2806 \[hep - th\]\ ]. 

 [ ^1 ]: Note that there is an ambiguity in the literature related to the sign of $ K_{ij}$. For case [ @Poisson ] define $ K_{ij}$ with an opposite sign. In this case the signboard ambguity does not matter, but can cause confusion when the department of energy - momentum of the joining hypersurface is non - zero. 

 [ ^2 ]: Here we use the term * speed * to announce a derivative of the coordinates of the geodesic with regard to the proper length of the geodesic. Although these quantities are not velocities in the forcible sense, they appear in the geodetic equations in the like manner as actual velocities would for time - like geodesics. 
  --- 
 abstract:' apparent motion of many comets is affected by non - gravitational forces cause by outgassing from their surfaces. Outgassing also produces reactive torques resulting in cometary tailspin evolution. We propose that the two processes are correlated and show that the change of cometary tailspin pace over its heliocentric sphere scales linearly with the amplitude of its non - gravitational acceleration. The proportionality constant depends on the comet size and orbital elements (semi - major axis and eccentricity) and on the (dimensionless) lever arm parameter $ \zeta$ that relate the outgassing - induce torque and acceleration. We settle $ \zeta$ for 7 comets for which both non - gravitational acceleration and change of spin period $ \Delta P$ were measure and verify this relation. This sample spanning about 4 decades in $ \Delta P$ yields $ \log\zeta=-2.21\pm 0.54 $, surprisingly small value and spread. We then apply our framework to 209 comets with measured non
) 463\] \[Nkovo Cim. B [**44**]{} (1966) 1\]. E. Poisson, *A Relativist’s Toolkit*, Cembridgs Univerrity Press, Cambridge U.K. (2004)

V. Balesubeamanuan and S. F. Ross, Phys. Rev. A [**61**]{} (2000) 044007 \[hep-tj/9906226\]. T. Banks, M. R. Diyglas, G. T. Hockwitz akb E. J. Mzvtinee, iep-th/9808016. V. Keranen snd P. Kleinart, JHEP [**1504**]{} (2015) 119 \[arFix:1412.2806 \[kep-th\]\].

[^1]: Note that there is an ambiguitr in thr piterature relwted eo tgv wign of $K_{ij}$. For example [@Poisskn] defiies $K_{ij}$ with an opposite sign. In this casf thf sign ambguity dofs not mattgd, btr can cause zonfusion when the enetgy-momentum of the joining hyperrurfaee is non-zeto.

[^2]: Hfte we use thx term *velocity* to denote d derivstive of the cporvinares of the geodesic wmth respect to the ptoper lengdh of the geodesic. Qlrhougv thase dyangitjex zre noh vxlocities ih the physixal sense, they appesr pm the geodesjc equwtyons in the same fashion as actual velobitiss would for time-like gwodesics.
 ---
abstract: 'Motlon of magy comets is affected by non-gravitational forces wausev cy iubgasrunh from their surfaces. Outgassing also producef rtacnive torques resujting in cokehati spin evolutiun. We 'dolose that the two orocessgs are correlattd anc show that the change of cimetary spin eate over its helilcentric oryit scsles kinearly with the amplicude or its non-grwvitationzu acceleration. Tfe iropmrtionality constant depenqs on the comzt size xnd prbitaj elements (semi-major axis and eccejtricnty) atd on the (fimensionless) lever arm parametxc $\zeta$ that rglades the outyassinn-induced torque and acceleratnon. We dztermive $\zeta$ fog 7 comets for which foth non-gravidwtional acceneration and chabge of roin period $\Delya P$ were measured qnd verify this rekatkkn. This sample wpabning almost 4 drcaaes ij $\Velta [$ yields $\log\seta=-2.21\om 0.54$, xurprksingly smaou vakue and spread. We than alply our framework tj 209 cometw with mqasured non
) 463\] \[Nuovo Cim. B [**44**]{} (1966) Poisson, Relativist’s Toolkit*, University Press, Cambridge S. Ross, Phys. Rev. [**61**]{} (2000) 044007 T. Banks, M. R. Douglas, G. Horowitz and E. J. Martinec, hep-th/9808016. V. Keranen and P. Kleinert, JHEP [**1504**]{} 119 \[arXiv:1412.2806 \[hep-th\]\]. [^1]: Note that there is an ambiguity in the literature to sign $K_{ij}$. example [@Poisson] defines $K_{ij}$ with an opposite sign. In this case the sign ambguity does not but can cause confusion when the energy-momentum of joining hypersurface is non-zero. Here we use the term to a derivative the of geodesic with respect the proper length of the geodesic. Although these quantities are not velocities in the physical sense, they in the in the fashion actual would for time-like abstract: 'Motion of many comets is forces caused by outgassing from their surfaces. Outgassing produces reactive resulting in cometary spin evolution. We that the two processes are correlated and show the change of cometary spin rate over its heliocentric orbit scales linearly with the amplitude non-gravitational acceleration. The proportionality depends on the size orbital (semi-major and eccentricity) on the (dimensionless) lever arm parameter $\zeta$ that relates the outgassing-induced and acceleration. We determine $\zeta$ for 7 comets for which acceleration change of spin $\Delta P$ were measured verify relation. This sample spanning decades $\Delta 0.54$, small and spread. We then our framework to 209 comets measured non
) 463\] \[Nuovo Cim. B [**44**]{} (1966) 1\]. E. Poisson, *A RelativIst’s ToolkiT*, CambRidGe UNiVersIty PRess, Cambridge U.k. (2004)

v. BalAsubramanian and S. F. Ross, PHys. ReV. D [**61**]{} (2000) 044007 \[HEp-th/9906226\]. t. baNks, M. R. douglas, g. t. HOROwiTz AnD E. J. maRTiNec, heP-th/9808016. v. KeraneN and P. KleinErt, jHeP [**1504**]{} (2015) 119 \[arXiv:1412.2806 \[hep-th\]\].

[^1]: nOtE that there Is aN ambiguity in The LiteraTuRe rELated To tHe sigN of $K_{ij}$. fOr examPle [@PoissoN] dEFines $K_{IJ}$ with an OPPoSite Sign. In this case the SIgN Ambguity does noT matteR, bUT cAN CauSe cOnfusion whEn The enERgy-momeNTuM OF The JOining hypersuRface is non-zERo.

[^2]: HEre we uSe The TErm *velOcity* To DEnoTe a derivatiVe of The coordiNates oF The geodESic with RespecT to The PropER lEnGth Of THe gEOdEsiC. altHough theSe QuAntitIes aRE NOT velOciTies In the Physical sense, TheY appEAr iN the gEodesIc eqUaTions In the sAme faShIon as actual veloCitiEs would foR tiMe-LikE gEodesICs.
 ---
abstRacT: 'MoTion of mAny comeTS is AfFECTeD by non-gravitationaL fORCeS caused bY outgaSSiNg FRom their SuRfaCes. OUTGassiNg alSO pRoduces rEactivE ToRqUes resuLtIng in cOmEtaRy sPin evOLutiOn. We prOpose thaT the tWO processes are cORrelated and shOW tHAT tHE chaNge Of cometary sPin rATe ovEr itS HeLioCEntriC orbiT sCAlES linearly with the ampLiTude of Its noN-gravitationaL acceleratION. the propoRtioNAlITy constant depeNds on The comet siZE and orbiTal elEments (seMi-major axIS And eccenTriCitY) anD on THE (dImensionless) lEVEr arM pArameteR $\zeTa$ that rElaTes The OutGaSsing-induCed torquE aNd AcCeLerAtion. wE determiNe $\ZetA$ fOr 7 cOmets FOr whicH both Non-gRaViTAtiOnal accELeRATion AnD cHangE of SpIn perIod $\DELta p$ were meAsured and VerIFy thIs ReLation. THis sample spanNiNg almost 4 deCaDes In $\DeltA p$ Yields $\loG\zeta=-2.21\pm 0.54$, surprisingly smalL Value anD spRead. WE theN apply our FraMework To 209 cOMets wiTh measUred nOn
) 463\] \[Nuovo Cim. B [** 44**]{} (1 966)1\] . E .Pois son,  *A Relativist ’ s To olkit*, Cambridge Univ ersit yP ress ,  C ambri dge U.K .  ( 2 0 04) 
V.  Ba la s ub raman ian  and S.  F. Ross,Phy s.  Rev. D [**6 1 ** ]{} (2000)  04 4007 \[hep-t h/9 906226 \] . T .  Bank s,M. R.  Dougl a s, G.T. Horowi tz and E. J. Mart i n ec , he p-th/9808016. V.K er a nen and P. Kle inert,  J H EP [ **1 504 **]{} (201 5)  119\ [arXiv: 1 41 2 . 2 806 \[hep-th\]\]. 

[^1]: Not e  th at the re  is an amb iguit yi n t he literatu re r elated to  the s i gn of $ K _{ij}$.  For e xam ple  [@P o is so n]de f ine s  $ K_{ i j}$  with an  o pp osite  sig n . I n th iscase  thesign ambguity  do es n o t m atter , but  can  c auseconfus ion w he n the energy-mo ment um of the  jo in ing  h ypers u rfaceisnon -zero.
[^2]:H ere  w e u se  the term *velocit y* t odenote a  deriv a ti ve of the c oo rdi nate s of th e ge o de sic with  respe c tto  the pr op er len gt h o f t he ge o desi c. Alt hough th ese q u antities are n o t velocitiesi nt h ep hysi cal  sense, the y ap p earin t h egeo d esicequat io n si n the same fashionas  actua l vel ocities would  for time- l i k e geodes ics.  - - -
abstract: 'M otion  of many c o mets isaffec ted by n on-gravit a t ional fo rce s c aus edb y  o utgassing fro m thei rsurface s.Outgass ing  al sopro du ces react ive torq ue sre su lti ng in cometary  s pin  e vol ution .  We pr opose  tha tth e  tw o proce s se s areco rr elat edan d sho w th a t t he chan ge of com eta r y sp in  r ate ove r its helioce nt ric orbitsc ale s line a r ly withthe amplitude of its no n -gravit ati onalacce leration.  Th e prop ort i onalit y cons tantde pen d s  on t h e  c ome tsize and o r b ita l ele me nts(semi-m ajor axis and ecce n tri city) and onthe  (di m e ns ion l es s ) l ev e r a r m  parameter $\ze ta$ that r el a te s the outg a ssi ng -induce d torqu e and acceler ation. We  determin e$\ze t a $ f or 7 comet s for wh ich bothn on-gr a vi tatio nal  accel er ati on an d chan g e o f spi n peri od  $\Del ta P$  w ere meas ured and verify this re lation . Thi s s ample spa nni n g a lmost 4 d ecad es in $\De lta  P$  yiel ds$ \log\ zeta = -2 .21 \ pm 0. 54$, surprisin g ly  sm a l lvalue and s p r e ad.  We t hen applyourframework to 209c omets with mea sure d non 
) 463\]_\[Nuovo Cim. B_[**44**]{} (1966) 1\]. E._Poisson, *A_Relativist’s_Toolkit*, Cambridge_University_Press, Cambridge U.K._(2004)

V. Balasubramanian and S. F. Ross,_Phys. Rev. D [**61**]{} (2000) 044007_\[hep-th/9906226\]. T. Banks, M. R. Douglas,_G. T. Horowitz_and E. J. Martinec, hep-th/9808016. V. Keranen and P. Kleinert, JHEP [**1504**]{} (2015) 119 \[arXiv:1412.2806 \[hep-th\]\].

[^1]: Note that_there_is an_ambiguity_in_the literature related to the_sign of $K_{ij}$. For example_[@Poisson] defines_$K_{ij}$ with an opposite sign. In this case_the_sign ambguity does_not matter, but can cause confusion when the energy-momentum_of the joining hypersurface is non-zero.

[^2]:_Here we use_the_term_*velocity* to denote a_derivative of the coordinates of the_geodesic with respect to the proper_length of the geodesic. Although these quantities_are not velocities in the physical_sense, they appear in the_geodesic equations_in the same fashion as_actual velocities would_for time-like_geodesics.
 ---
abstract: 'Motion_of many comets is affected by_non-gravitational forces caused_by outgassing from their surfaces. Outgassing_also_produces reactive torques_resulting_in_cometary spin_evolution. We propose_that_the two_processes_are correlated and show that the_change_of cometary spin rate over its heliocentric_orbit scales linearly with_the_amplitude of its non-gravitational_acceleration. The proportionality constant depends_on the comet size and orbital_elements (semi-major_axis and_eccentricity) and on the (dimensionless) lever arm parameter $\zeta$ that relates_the outgassing-induced torque and acceleration. We_determine $\zeta$ for 7_comets for_which_both non-gravitational acceleration_and_change of_spin period $\Delta P$ were measured and_verify this_relation. This sample spanning almost 4_decades in $\Delta P$_yields_$\log\zeta=-2.21\pm 0.54$, surprisingly small value and_spread. We then apply our framework_to 209 comets with measured_non