k^2}
{(\sum_l m_l^2 \phi_l^2)^2} + \frac{1}{\sum_j \phi_j^2}\right]\,,\end{aligned}$$ where again the last line specializes to Nflation.

The other main inflationary observable is the tensor-to-scalar ratio $r$. The tensor spectrum is given by the usual formula, as it depends only on the expansion rate history $H(a)$, $${\cal P}_g = \frac{2 H^2}{\pi^2 M^2_{\rm Pl}}\simeq \frac{2V}{3\pi^2
M_{\rm Pl}^4}\,.$$ Thus the tensor-to-scalar ratio is given by $$\begin{aligned}
r \cong \frac{{\cal P}_g}{{\cal P}_{\cal R}}
&\simeq& \frac{8 M_{\rm Pl}^2}{\sum_j \left({V_j}/{V'_j}\right)^2}\,;\\
&\simeq& \frac{32 M^2_{\rm Pl}}{\sum_j \phi_j^2} \simeq \frac{8}{N}\,,\end{aligned}$$ with the last line holding only for the Nflation case of massive coupled fields and which uses Eq. (\[e:efolds1\]).

This last formula immediately gives a striking result first noted by Alabidi and Lyth [@AL]: in Nflation the tensor-to-scalar ratio is *independent* (within the slow-roll approximation) of the number of fields present, their masses, and their initial conditions. It is given simply by the number of $e$-foldings at which the expression is evaluated. This result is confirmed by our numerical code, with variation only in the third significant figure due to slow-roll corrections. Nflation therefore gives a definitive prediction for the tensor-to-scalar ratio, and moreover one that is readily accessible to upcoming experiments.

We will throughout assume that the observable scales crossed outside the horizon 50 $e$-foldings before the end of inflation. For comparison with later results, the observables obtained for a single massive field are given by $$\begin{aligned}
n_{{\rm S}}-1 & = & -0.04 \quad (-0.0404)\\
r & = & 0.16 \quad \; \; \: (0.162)\end{aligned}$$ where the first number
k^2 } 
 { (\sum_l m_l^2 \phi_l^2)^2 } + \frac{1}{\sum_j \phi_j^2}\right]\,,\end{aligned}$$ where again the last line specializes to Nflation. 

 The other chief inflationary discernible is the tensor - to - scalar ratio $ r$. The tensor spectrum is given by the common formula, as it count only on the expansion rate history $ H(a)$, $ $ { \cal P}_g = \frac{2 H^2}{\pi^2 M^2_{\rm Pl}}\simeq \frac{2V}{3\pi^2 
 M_{\rm Pl}^4}\,.$$ therefore the tensor - to - scalar proportion is given by $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 r \cong \frac{{\cal P}_g}{{\cal P}_{\cal R } } 
 & \simeq & \frac{8 M_{\rm Pl}^2}{\sum_j \left({V_j}/{V'_j}\right)^2}\,;\\ 
 & \simeq & \frac{32 M^2_{\rm Pl}}{\sum_j \phi_j^2 } \simeq \frac{8}{N}\,,\end{aligned}$$ with the last line holding entirely for the Nflation case of massive coupled field and which uses Eq.   (\[e: efolds1\ ]). 

 This last rule immediately gives a striking consequence first noted by Alabidi and Lyth [ @AL ]: in Nflation the tensor - to - scalar ratio is * autonomous * (within the slow - roll estimate) of the number of field present, their masses, and their initial condition. It is given simply by the number of $ e$-foldings at which the formula is evaluated. This result is confirmed by our numerical code, with variation only in the third significant figure due to slow - roll corrections. Nflation therefore gives a definitive prediction for the tensor - to - scalar ratio, and moreover one that is readily accessible to upcoming experiment. 

 We will throughout assume that the discernible scale crossed outside the horizon 50 $ e$-foldings before the end of inflation. For comparison with late results, the observables obtained for a single massive field are move over by $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 n_{{\rm S}}-1 & = & -0.04 \quad (-0.0404)\\ 
 r & = & 0.16 \quad \; \; \: (0.162)\end{aligned}$$ where the first number
k^2}
{(\sul_l m_l^2 \phi_l^2)^2} + \frac{1}{\sum_j \phi_m^2}\right]\,,\end{aligned}$$ where egain tge last uine specializes to Nflation.

Vhe ither main inflationary obsdrvable id the tebsor-uo-scalar ratio $r$. Vge tensor spedbrum ns given by the osual formuld, as it dependv unpy on the expansion rate history $H(a)$, $${\cal P}_g = \vrac{2 H^2}{\pi^2 M^2_{\rm Pj}}\simtq \srac{2B}{3\ii^2
N_{\rm Pl}^4}\,.$$ Thus the tensor-to-scalad ratio is given by $$\negin{aligned}
r \cong \frac{{\cal P}_g}{{\cwl P}_{\cal R}}
&\simeq& \fraf{8 M_{\rm Pl}^2}{\sum_h \lesr({V_j}/{V'_j}\right)^2}\,;\\
&\sioeq& \frac{32 M^2_{\gk Pl}}{\sum_j \pgi_j^2} \simeq \frac{8}{N}\,,\end{aligned}$$ with ghe lcst line hoodung mnly for thx Nflanion case of massive woupled fields and whlch uves Eq. (\[e:efolds1\]).

This last fmrmula immediately gives a vtxiking result first nitwd by Alatidi qnd Lyuh [@EL]: jn Nflwtikn the tenaor-to-scalar ratio is *independemt* (qithin the slkw-roll a[proximation) of the number of fields prtsent, their masses, and their initial conditions. Ij is given simply by the number of $e$-foldings at which the efpresakon if wvwluated. This result is confirmed by our numerydak bode, with variatijn only in yhf yrird significxnt fiyhrs due to slow-roll forrectyons. Bflation uheregore gives a definitive preeiction for nhe rensor-to-scalar ratno, and moreorer ong that is readily accessible co upckming experlments.

We skll throughout arsuke that tht observable scalef crossed outxide thd hotizon 50 $q$-foldings heforc the end of inflatlon. Flr comparisoj with later results, the observeules obtained fmr d single masslve field are gyven by $$\begin{akigned}
n_{{\xm S}}-1 & = & -0.04 \quad (-0.0404)\\
r & = & 0.16 \quav \; \; \: (0.162)\end{aligged}$$ where the virst number
k^2} {(\sum_l m_l^2 \phi_l^2)^2} + \frac{1}{\sum_j \phi_j^2}\right]\,,\end{aligned}$$ the line specializes Nflation. The other tensor-to-scalar $r$. The tensor is given by usual formula, as it depends only the expansion rate history $H(a)$, $${\cal P}_g = \frac{2 H^2}{\pi^2 M^2_{\rm Pl}}\simeq \frac{2V}{3\pi^2 Pl}^4}\,.$$ Thus the tensor-to-scalar ratio is given by $$\begin{aligned} r \cong \frac{{\cal P}_g}{{\cal R}} \frac{8 Pl}^2}{\sum_j &\simeq& \frac{32 M^2_{\rm Pl}}{\sum_j \phi_j^2} \simeq \frac{8}{N}\,,\end{aligned}$$ with the last line holding only for the Nflation of massive coupled fields and which uses Eq. This last formula immediately a striking result first noted Alabidi Lyth [@AL]: Nflation tensor-to-scalar is *independent* (within slow-roll approximation) of the number of fields present, their masses, and their initial conditions. It is given by the $e$-foldings at the is This result is our numerical code, with variation only significant figure due to slow-roll corrections. Nflation therefore a definitive for the tensor-to-scalar ratio, and moreover that is readily accessible to upcoming experiments. We throughout assume that the observable scales crossed outside the horizon 50 $e$-foldings before the end For comparison with later the observables obtained a massive are by $$\begin{aligned} S}}-1 & = & -0.04 \quad (-0.0404)\\ r & = & \quad \; \; \: (0.162)\end{aligned}$$ where the first number
k^2}
{(\sum_l m_l^2 \phi_l^2)^2} + \frac{1}{\sum_j \phi_j^2}\riGht]\,,\end{aligNed}$$ whEre AgaIn The lAst lIne specializes TO NflAtion.

The other main inflaTionaRy OBserVAbLe is tHe tensoR-To-SCAlaR rAtIo $r$. thE TeNsor sPecTrum is gIven by the uSuaL fOrmula, as it dePEnDs only on thE exPansion rate hIstOry $H(a)$, $${\cAl p}_g = \fRAc{2 H^2}{\pi^2 m^2_{\rm pl}}\simEq \frac{2v}{3\Pi^2
M_{\rm PL}^4}\,.$$ Thus the tEnSOr-to-scALar ratiO IS gIven By $$\begin{aligned}
r \coNG \fRAc{{\cal P}_g}{{\cal P}_{\cal r}}
&\simeq& \FrAC{8 M_{\RM pl}^2}{\sUm_j \Left({V_j}/{V'_j}\riGhT)^2}\,;\\
&\simeQ& \Frac{32 M^2_{\rm pL}}{\sUM_J \Phi_J^2} \Simeq \frac{8}{N}\,,\end{Aligned}$$ with THe lAst linE hOldINg only For thE NFLatIon case of maSsivE coupled fIelds aND which uSEs Eq. (\[e:efOlds1\]).

ThIs lAst FormULa ImMedIaTEly GIvEs a STriKing resuLt FiRst noTed bY aLABidi And lyth [@aL]: in NFlation the tenSor-To-scALar Ratio Is *indEpenDeNt* (witHin the Slow-rOlL approximation) oF the Number of fIelDs PreSeNt, theIR masseS, anD thEir initIal condITioNs. iT IS gIven simply by the numBeR OF $e$-Foldings At whicH ThE eXPression Is EvaLuatED. this rEsulT Is ConfirmeD by our NUmErIcal codE, wIth varIaTioN onLy in tHE thiRd signIficant fIgure DUe to slow-roll coRRections. NflatIOn THErEFore GivEs a definitiVe prEDictIon fOR tHe tENsor-tO-scalAr RAtIO, and moreover one that Is ReadilY acceSsible to upcomIng experimENTS.

We will tHrouGHoUT assume that the ObserVable scaleS Crossed oUtsidE the horiZon 50 $e$-foldiNGS before tHe eNd oF inFlaTIOn. for comparison WITh laTeR resultS, thE observAblEs oBtaIneD fOr a single Massive fIeLd ArE gIveN by $$\beGIn{aligneD}
n_{{\Rm S}}-1 & = & -0.04 \QuAd (-0.0404)\\
r & = & 0.16 \Quad \; \; \: (0.162)\eND{alignEd}$$ wheRe thE fIrST nuMber
k^2}
{(\sum_l m_l^2 \phi_l ^2)^2} + \ frac{ 1}{ \su m_ j \p hi_j ^2}\right]\,,\ e nd{a ligned}$$ where againthe l as t  lin e  s pecia lizes t o  N f l ati on .
Th eo th er ma ininflati onary obse rva bl e is the ten s or -to-scalar  ra tio $r$. The  te nsor s pe ctr u m isgiv en by  the u s ual fo rmula, as  i t  depen d s onlyo n  t he e xpansion rate his t or y  $H(a)$, $${\c al P}_ g=  \ f r ac{ 2 H ^2}{\pi^2M^ 2_{\r m  Pl}}\s i me q \ fra c {2V}{3\pi^2
M _{\rm Pl}^4 } \,. $$ Thu sthe tensor -to-s ca l arratio is gi venby $$\beg in{ali g ned}
r\ cong \f rac{{\ cal  P} _g}{ { \c al  P} _{ \ cal R} }
& \ sim eq& \fra c{ 8M_{\r m Pl } ^ 2 } {\su m_j  \le ft({V _j}/{V'_j}\ri ght )^2} \ ,;\ \
&\s imeq&  \fr ac {32 M ^2_{\r m Pl} }{ \sum_j \phi_j^2 } \s imeq \fra c{8 }{ N}\ ,, \end{ a ligned }$$  wi th thelast li n e h ol d i n gonly for the Nflat io n ca se of ma ssivec ou pl e d fields  a ndwhic h usesEq.( \[ e:efolds 1\]).Th is  last f or mula i mm edi ate ly gi v es a  strik ing resu lt fi r st noted by Al a bidi and Lyth [@ A L ]: in N fla tion the te nsor - to-s cala r  r ati o  is * indep en d en t * (within the slow- ro ll app roxim ation) of the  number of f i elds pre sent ,  t h eir masses, an d the ir initial conditio ns. I t is giv en simply b y the nu mbe r o f $ e$- f o ld ings at which t he e xp ression  is  evalua ted . T his  re su lt is con firmed b you rnu mer icalc ode, wit hvar ia tio n onl y  in th e thi rd s ig ni f ica nt figu r ed u e to  s lo w-ro llco rrect ions .  Nf lationtherefore  gi v es a  d ef initive  prediction f or  the tenso r- to- scalar r atio, an d moreover one that isr eadilyacc essib le t o upcomin g e xperim ent s .

Wewill t hroug ho uta s sumet h at  th eobservable s cal es cr os sedoutside  the horizon 50 $e $ -fo ldings before  th e en d of  in f la t ion .F orc o mparison with l ater resul ts ,  t he observa b les  o btained  for asingl e  massiv e field a re givenby  $$\ b e gin {aligned}n_{{\rmS}}-1 & = & -0. 0 4\quad  (- 0.0404 )\ \
r  & =& 0.16 \qu ad \;  \; \:  ( 0.162) \end{ al igned}$$  where the first number 
k^2}
{(\sum_l m_l^2_\phi_l^2)^2} +_\frac{1}{\sum_j \phi_j^2}\right]\,,\end{aligned}$$ where again_the last_line_specializes to_Nflation.

The_other main inflationary_observable is the_tensor-to-scalar ratio $r$. The_tensor spectrum is_given_by the usual formula, as it depends only on the expansion rate history $H(a)$,_$${\cal_P}_g =_\frac{2_H^2}{\pi^2_M^2_{\rm Pl}}\simeq \frac{2V}{3\pi^2
M_{\rm Pl}^4}\,.$$ Thus_the tensor-to-scalar ratio is given_by $$\begin{aligned}
r_\cong \frac{{\cal P}_g}{{\cal P}_{\cal R}}
&\simeq& \frac{8 M_{\rm Pl}^2}{\sum_j_\left({V_j}/{V'_j}\right)^2}\,;\\
&\simeq&_\frac{32 M^2_{\rm Pl}}{\sum_j_\phi_j^2} \simeq \frac{8}{N}\,,\end{aligned}$$ with the last line holding only_for the Nflation case of massive_coupled fields and_which_uses_Eq. (\[e:efolds1\]).

This last formula immediately_gives a striking result first noted_by Alabidi and Lyth [@AL]: in_Nflation the tensor-to-scalar ratio is *independent* (within_the slow-roll approximation) of the number_of fields present, their masses,_and their_initial conditions. It is given_simply by the_number of_$e$-foldings at which_the expression is evaluated. This result_is confirmed by_our numerical code, with variation only_in_the third significant_figure_due_to slow-roll_corrections. Nflation therefore_gives_a definitive_prediction_for the tensor-to-scalar ratio, and moreover_one_that is readily accessible to upcoming experiments.

We_will throughout assume that_the_observable scales crossed outside_the horizon 50 $e$-foldings before_the end of inflation. For comparison_with later_results, the_observables obtained for a single massive field are given by $$\begin{aligned}
n_{{\rm_S}}-1 & = & -0.04 \quad_(-0.0404)\\
r & = &_0.16 \quad_\;_\; \: (0.162)\end{aligned}$$_where_the first_number