a(t)$ via a designer approach, we argue that no sensible Minkowski limit exists for this theory once this connection has been made. For a brief discussion of this see Appendix \[app:B\]. In the context of the Equation of State approach, in the limit of $H \rightarrow 0$ we see that $\rho$, $P \rightarrow 0$ from and. Therefore, the expressions for $w_{\mathrm{de}}\Pi^S$ and $w_{\mathrm{de}}\Gamma$ cannot be computed since $w_{\mathrm{de}}\Pi^S$ appears as $P\Pi^S$ from the perturbed energy momentum tensor and $w_{\mathrm{de}}\Gamma$ can be written as $w_{\mathrm{de}}\rho\Gamma = \left(\frac{\delta P}{\delta \rho}-\frac{dP}{d\rho} \right) \delta \rho$.

Special cases
-------------

### $w_{\mathrm{de}}=-1$

Consider the case where we have exactly $w_{\mathrm{de}}=-1$, equivalent to $\Lambda\mathrm{CDM}$. From we have an analytical solution given by and in this case the $c_\Pi$ and $c_\Gamma$ coefficients reduce to $$c_{\Pi\Delta} = \frac{c_{13}}{c_{14}}, \quad
c_{\Pi\Theta} = \frac{1}{2}\left(1+\epsilon_H \right) - \frac{c_{13}}{c_{14}},\quad
c_{\Pi X} = 0, \quad
c_{\Pi Y} =  -\frac{c_{13}}{3\alpha}\left( 1+\frac{M^2\mathcal{F}_0}{6\Omega_{\mathrm{de},0}H_0^2}\right)\left( \frac{H}{H_0}\right)  ,$$ and also $$c_{\Gamma \Delta} = -c_{\Gamma \Theta} = -\frac{dP}{d\rho}=1, \quad
c_{\Gamma W} = c_{\Gamma X} = c_{\Gamma Y} = 0,$$ and hence $\Gamma = \delta$. Here we see that from $c_{\Pi Y}$, as with the background evolution, $M$ and $\mathcal{F}_0$ are degenerate.

This case is indistinguishable from $\Lambda\mathrm{CDM}$ at background order, but at
a(t)$ via a designer approach, we argue that no sensible Minkowski limit exist for this hypothesis once this connection has been made. For a abbreviated discussion of this see Appendix \[app: B\ ]. In the context of the Equation of State approach path, in the limit of $ H \rightarrow 0 $ we watch that $ \rho$, $ P \rightarrow 0 $ from and. Therefore, the expression for $ w_{\mathrm{de}}\Pi^S$ and $ w_{\mathrm{de}}\Gamma$ cannot be computed since $ w_{\mathrm{de}}\Pi^S$ appears as $ P\Pi^S$ from the perturb energy momentum tensor and $ w_{\mathrm{de}}\Gamma$ can be written as $ w_{\mathrm{de}}\rho\Gamma = \left(\frac{\delta P}{\delta \rho}-\frac{dP}{d\rho } \right) \delta \rho$. 

 limited cases 
 ------------- 

 # # # $ w_{\mathrm{de}}=-1 $ 

 Consider the case where we have exactly $ w_{\mathrm{de}}=-1 $, equivalent to $ \Lambda\mathrm{CDM}$. From we have an analytic solution given by and in this case the $ c_\Pi$ and $ c_\Gamma$ coefficients abridge to $ $ c_{\Pi\Delta } = \frac{c_{13}}{c_{14 } }, \quad 
 c_{\Pi\Theta } = \frac{1}{2}\left(1+\epsilon_H \right) - \frac{c_{13}}{c_{14}},\quad 
 c_{\Pi X } = 0, \quad 
 c_{\Pi Y } =   -\frac{c_{13}}{3\alpha}\left (1+\frac{M^2\mathcal{F}_0}{6\Omega_{\mathrm{de},0}H_0 ^ 2}\right)\left (\frac{H}{H_0}\right)  , $ $ and also $ $ c_{\Gamma \Delta } = -c_{\Gamma \Theta } = -\frac{dP}{d\rho}=1, \quad 
 c_{\Gamma W } = c_{\Gamma X } = c_{\Gamma Y } = 0,$$ and therefore $ \Gamma = \delta$. Here we see that from $ c_{\Pi Y}$, as with the backdrop evolution, $ M$ and $ \mathcal{F}_0 $ are degenerate. 

 This case is identical from $ \Lambda\mathrm{CDM}$ at background order, but at
a(t)$ gia a designer approach, de argue that no sensiule Miniowski lkmit exists for this theory lnxe thus connection has been made. For a brief disrussion of this see Appekbix \[ali:B\]. In vhe context of jhe Equation of State apprmazh, in the limit of $H \rightarrow 0$ we sqe that $\rjo$, $P \rightarror 0$ fgoi ans. Therefore, the expressions for $w_{\mzthrm{de}}\Ki^S$ and $w_{\mathrm{de}}\Gsmma$ cannot be computed sijce $a_{\mathrm{de}}\Pi^S$ appeags as $P\Pi^S$ drom rhe perturbea energy momentum tenskr and $w_{\mathrm{de}}\Gamma$ can be wrktten as $w_{\mathrn{dw}}\rhl\Camma = \left(\hrac{\dejta P}{\delta \rmp}-\frac{d[}{d\rho} \roght) \delta \rho$.

Xperial cases
-------------

### $w_{\mathrm{de}}=-1$

Consiver the case where wg have exawtmy $w_{\mathrm{de}}=-1$, equicaoent jo $\Lakbda\oqthfm{CSM}$. Fdom we hate an analyfical solutuon given by and in trpx case the $c_\Li$ and $c_\Damma$ coefficients reduce to $$c_{\Pi\Delta} = \xrad{c_{13}}{c_{14}}, \quad
c_{\Pi\Theta} = \frac{1}{2}\lwft(1+\epsilon_H \right) - \frwc{c_{13}}{c_{14}},\quad
c_{\[i X} = 0, \quad
c_{\Pi Y} =  -\frac{c_{13}}{3\alpha}\left( 1+\frac{M^2\mathcal{F}_0}{6\Omaga_{\mavhfm{dt},0}H_0^2}\vlght)\uwfh( \frac{H}{H_0}\right)  ,$$ and also $$c_{\Gamma \Delta} = -c_{\Gamma \Fhtta} = -\frac{dP}{d\rho}=1, \qmad
c_{\Gamma W} = c_{\Gamms D} = s_{\Gamma Y} = 0,$$ ana hencz $\Gzmma = \delta$. Here wf see trat feom $c_{\Pi Y}$, as eith the background evolutiin, $M$ and $\matkcao{F}_0$ are degenerate.

Tkis case is nndistonguixhable from $\Lambda\mathro{CDM}$ at backgroknd order, cut at
a(t)$ via a designer approach, we argue sensible limit exists this theory once For brief discussion of see Appendix \[app:B\]. the context of the Equation of approach, in the limit of $H \rightarrow 0$ we see that $\rho$, $P 0$ from and. Therefore, the expressions for $w_{\mathrm{de}}\Pi^S$ and $w_{\mathrm{de}}\Gamma$ cannot be computed $w_{\mathrm{de}}\Pi^S$ as from perturbed energy momentum tensor and $w_{\mathrm{de}}\Gamma$ can be written as $w_{\mathrm{de}}\rho\Gamma = \left(\frac{\delta P}{\delta \rho}-\frac{dP}{d\rho} \right) \rho$. Special cases ------------- ### $w_{\mathrm{de}}=-1$ Consider the where we have exactly equivalent to $\Lambda\mathrm{CDM}$. From we an solution given and this the $c_\Pi$ and coefficients reduce to $$c_{\Pi\Delta} = \frac{c_{13}}{c_{14}}, \quad c_{\Pi\Theta} = \frac{1}{2}\left(1+\epsilon_H \right) - \frac{c_{13}}{c_{14}},\quad c_{\Pi X} = 0, c_{\Pi Y} 1+\frac{M^2\mathcal{F}_0}{6\Omega_{\mathrm{de},0}H_0^2}\right)\left( \frac{H}{H_0}\right) and $$c_{\Gamma = -c_{\Gamma \Theta} \quad c_{\Gamma W} = c_{\Gamma X} = 0,$$ and hence $\Gamma = \delta$. Here see that $c_{\Pi Y}$, as with the background $M$ and $\mathcal{F}_0$ are degenerate. This case is from $\Lambda\mathrm{CDM}$ at background order, but at
a(t)$ via a designer approach, we aRgue that no SensiBle minKoWski LimiT exists for this THeorY once this connection has Been mAdE. for a BRiEf disCussion OF tHIS seE APpEndIx \[APp:b\]. In thE coNtext of The EquatioN of stAte approach, iN ThE limit of $H \rIghTarrow 0$ we see tHat $\Rho$, $P \riGhTarROw 0$ froM anD. TherEfore, tHE expreSsions for $W_{\mAThrm{de}}\pI^S$ and $w_{\mATHrM{de}}\GAmma$ cannot be compuTEd SInce $w_{\mathrm{de}}\PI^S$ appeArS As $p\pI^S$ fRom The perturbEd EnergY MomentuM TeNSOR anD $W_{\mathrm{de}}\GammA$ can be writtEN as $W_{\mathrM{dE}}\rhO\gamma = \lEft(\frAc{\DEltA P}{\delta \rho}-\fRac{dp}{d\rho} \righT) \delta \RHo$.

SpeciAL cases
-------------

### $w_{\Mathrm{De}}=-1$

COnsIder THe CaSe wHeRE we HAvE exACtlY $w_{\mathrm{De}}=-1$, EqUivalEnt tO $\lAMBda\mAthRm{CDm}$. From We have an analyTicAl soLUtiOn givEn by aNd in ThIs casE the $c_\PI$ and $c_\gaMma$ coefficients ReduCe to $$c_{\Pi\DeLta} = \FrAc{c_{13}}{C_{14}}, \qUad
c_{\PI\theta} = \fRac{1}{2}\LefT(1+\epsiloN_H \right) - \FRac{C_{13}}{c_{14}},\QUAD
c_{\pi X} = 0, \quad
c_{\Pi Y} =  -\frac{c_{13}}{3\alPhA}\LEfT( 1+\frac{M^2\maThcal{F}_0}{6\oMeGa_{\MAthrm{de},0}H_0^2}\RiGht)\Left( \FRAc{H}{H_0}\rIght)  ,$$ ANd Also $$c_{\GamMa \DeltA} = -C_{\GAmMa \Theta} = -\FrAc{dP}{d\rHo}=1, \QuaD
c_{\GAmma W} = C_{\gammA X} = c_{\GamMa Y} = 0,$$ and heNce $\GaMMa = \delta$. Here we sEE that from $c_{\Pi Y}$, AS wITH tHE bacKgrOund evolutiOn, $M$ aND $\matHcal{f}_0$ ArE deGEneraTe.

ThiS cASe IS indistinguishable fRoM $\LambdA\mathRm{CDM}$ at backgrOund order, bUT AT
a(t)$ via a designer appro ach, we ar gue t hat  no  s ensi bleMinkowski limi t  exi sts for this theory on ce th is conn e ct ion h as been ma d e . F or  a  br ie f  d iscus sio n of th is see App end ix  \[app:B\].I nthe contex t o f the Equati onof Sta te  ap p roach , i n the  limit of $H\rightarr ow 0$ wes ee that $ \r ho$,  $P \rightarrow 0 $  f r om and. Theref ore, t he ex p r ess ion s for $w_{ \m athrm { de}}\Pi ^ S$ a n d $ w _{\mathrm{de} }\Gamma$ ca n not  be co mp ute d  since  $w_{ \m a thr m{de}}\Pi^S $ ap pears as$P\Pi^ S $ fromt he pert urbedene rgy  mom e nt um  te ns o r a n d$w_ { \ma thrm{de} }\ Ga mma$canb e w ritt enas $ w_{\m athrm{de}}\rh o\G amma = \ left( \frac {\de lt a P}{ \delta  \rho }- \frac{dP}{d\rho } \r ight) \de lta  \ rho $. 

Spe c ial ca ses 
-- ------- ----

# # # $ w_ { \ m at hrm{de}}=-1$

Cons id e r  t he casewherew eha v e exactl y$w_ {\ma t h rm{de }}=- 1 $,  equival ent to $\ La mbda\ma th rm{CDM }$ . F rom  we h a ve a n anal ytical s oluti o n given by and in this caset he $ c_ \ Pi$and  $c_\Gamma$  coe f fici ents re duc e  to $ $c_{\ Pi \ De l ta} = \frac{c_{13}} {c _{14}} , \qu ad
c_{\Pi\The ta} = \fra c { 1 }{2}\lef t(1+ \ ep s ilon_H \right)  - \f rac{c_{13} } {c_{14}} ,\qua d
c_{\Pi  X} = 0,\ q uad
c_{\ PiY}= -\f r a c{ c_{13}}{3\alp h a }\le ft ( 1+\fr ac{ M^2\mat hca l{F }_0 }{6 \O mega_{\ma thrm{de} ,0 }H _0 ^2 }\r ight) \ left( \f ra c{H }{ H_0 }\rig h t)  ,$ $ and  als o$$ c _{\ Gamma \ D el t a } =-c _{ \Gam ma\T heta}  = - \ fra c{dP}{d \rho}=1,\qu a d
c_ {\ Ga mma W}= c_{\Gamma X }= c_{\Gamm aY}= 0,$$ a nd hence  $\Gamma = \delta$. Her e  we see  th at fr om $ c_{\Pi Y} $,as wit h t h e back ground  evol ut ion , $M$ a n d  $ \ma th cal{F}_0$a r e d egene ra te.
This c ase is indistingui s hab le from $\Lam bda \mat h r m{ CDM } $a t b ac k gro u n d order, but at 
a(t)$ via_a designer_approach, we argue that_no sensible_Minkowski_limit exists_for_this theory once_this connection has_been made. For a_brief discussion of_this_see Appendix \[app:B\]. In the context of the Equation of State approach, in the_limit_of $H_\rightarrow_0$_we see that $\rho$, $P_\rightarrow 0$ from and. Therefore,_the expressions_for $w_{\mathrm{de}}\Pi^S$ and $w_{\mathrm{de}}\Gamma$ cannot be computed since_$w_{\mathrm{de}}\Pi^S$_appears as $P\Pi^S$_from the perturbed energy momentum tensor and $w_{\mathrm{de}}\Gamma$ can_be written as $w_{\mathrm{de}}\rho\Gamma = \left(\frac{\delta_P}{\delta \rho}-\frac{dP}{d\rho} \right)_\delta_\rho$.

Special_cases
-------------

### $w_{\mathrm{de}}=-1$

Consider the case_where we have exactly $w_{\mathrm{de}}=-1$, equivalent_to $\Lambda\mathrm{CDM}$. From we have an_analytical solution given by and in this_case the $c_\Pi$ and $c_\Gamma$ coefficients_reduce to $$c_{\Pi\Delta} = \frac{c_{13}}{c_{14}},_\quad
c_{\Pi\Theta} =_\frac{1}{2}\left(1+\epsilon_H \right) - \frac{c_{13}}{c_{14}},\quad
c_{\Pi X}_= 0, \quad
c_{\Pi_Y} =_ -\frac{c_{13}}{3\alpha}\left( 1+\frac{M^2\mathcal{F}_0}{6\Omega_{\mathrm{de},0}H_0^2}\right)\left(_\frac{H}{H_0}\right)  ,$$ and also $$c_{\Gamma_\Delta} = -c_{\Gamma_\Theta} = -\frac{dP}{d\rho}=1, \quad
c_{\Gamma W} =_c_{\Gamma_X} = c_{\Gamma_Y}_=_0,$$ and_hence $\Gamma =_\delta$._Here we_see_that from $c_{\Pi Y}$, as with_the_background evolution, $M$ and $\mathcal{F}_0$ are degenerate.

This_case is indistinguishable from_$\Lambda\mathrm{CDM}$_at background order, but_at