 use in practice due to the finite experimental resolution, however they still serve as useful examples to demonstrate the potential effects of varying bin sizes in the analysis. In the upper left plot we show the co-occurrences for the whole mixed sample with S/B=$5\%$ and four different choices of bin sizes. In each of the other three plots we then show the co-occurrences for different numbers of signal events (again $100$, $500$, and $1000$) and varying bin sizes. As expected, larger bin sizes result in stronger co-occurrences, however the size of this effect is not as large as the effect of removing observables from the analysis completely. For example, in all cases the strength of the co-occurrences at $m_0\simeq m_W$ is almost the same for all choices of the binning. The effect due to different bin sizes is more clearly seen away from these areas of strongest co-occurrence, where larger bin sizes result in stronger co-occurrences across the whole $m_{0}$ range. In particular, this may aid in better modelling of the signal and background distributions away from $m_{0}\simeq m_W$ and $m_0 \simeq m_\phi$. On the other hand, increasing the bin size will also make the signal features less pronounced, potentially reducing the classification power in the same way as a binned likelihood classifier becomes worse and worse approximation to the Neyman-Pearson un-binned likelihood. Therefore there is trade-off here between potential classification power and the ability of VI to extract optimal theme distributions from the data. In particular we find that the constant $\delta m_0 = 10$ GeV bin size provides the best trade-off for the examples satudied here and is also in practice close to the variable binning $\delta m_0 = 0.05 m_0$ mimicking the typical (energy) resolution of modern particle detector calorimeters.

Unsupervised learning with LDA {#sec:ldaresults}
==============================

As our main result we present two applications of the technique outlined in the preceding sections. Using the two benchmark examples discussed in Sec. \[sec:bm1\] and Sec. \[sec:bm2\] we construct various mixed event samples, i.e. mixtures of background and signal events. For the boosted $t\bar{t}$ example we construct mixed samples with $9\times 10^4$ events, and with S/B ratios: $
use in practice due to the finite experimental resolution, however they still service as utilitarian examples to demonstrate the likely effects of vary bin sizes in the analysis. In the upper leftover plot we express the co - happening for the whole mixed sample distribution with S / B=$5\%$ and four different choices of bin sizes. In each of the early three plots we then show the conscientious objector - occurrences for different number of signal events (again $ 100 $, $ 500 $, and $ 1000 $) and varying bin sizes. As expect, larger bin sizes result in stronger carbon monoxide - occurrences, however the size of this effect is not as large as the effect of murder observables from the analysis completely. For example, in all cases the strength of the co - occurrences at $ m_0\simeq m_W$ is almost the same for all choices of the binning. The effect due to different bin sizes is more clearly seen away from these areas of strong co - occurrence, where big bin size result in stronger co - happening across the whole $ m_{0}$ range. In particular, this may aid in good modelling of the signal and background distributions away from $ m_{0}\simeq m_W$ and $ m_0 \simeq m_\phi$. On the other hand, increase the bin size will also make the signal features less pronounce, potentially reducing the categorization ability in the same way as a binned likelihood classifier becomes worse and worse approximation to the Neyman - Pearson un - binned likelihood. consequently there is craft - off here between potential classification might and the ability of VI to extract optimum theme distributions from the data. In particular we find that the changeless $ \delta m_0 = 10 $ GeV bin size leave the best barter - off for the examples satudied here and is also in practice close to the variable bin $ \delta m_0 = 0.05 m_0 $ mimicking the typical (energy) resoluteness of modern particle detector calorimeters. 

 Unsupervised learning with LDA { # sec: ldaresults } 
 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 

 As our main consequence we present two applications of the proficiency outlined in the preceding sections. Using the two benchmark examples discussed in Sec. \[sec: bm1\ ] and Sec. \[sec: bm2\ ] we construct versatile mixed event samples, i.e. mixtures of background and signal events. For the hike $ t\bar{t}$ case we manufacture mixed samples with $ 9\times 10 ^ 4 $ events, and with S / B ratios: $
 usf in practice due to the finite experimgnral revolutikn, howevdr they still serve as usefup wxampoes to demonstrate the potentiap effectw of carying bii sizes lu the wnalvsms. In the upper left plot we show the cm-ozcbrrences for the whole mixed sample rith S/B=$5\%$ ajd four differgnt cnjicea of bin sizes. In each of the othed three plots we them show the co-occurrences flr dlfferent numbers ov signal evghts (qgain $100$, $500$, and $1000$) and varying bin sizes. As expected, larger bin sizes rdsult in stronggx co-lwcurrences, ioweveg the size of this efxect is not as large ss vhe wffect of removing obvervables from the analysis ckmpletely. For exanpoe, in all casdw tfe atcenfth of thx co-occurrehces at $m_0\sineq m_W$ is almost tht swne for all chkices jf the binning. The effect due to differenu bin sizes is more clearly ween away from these wreas of ftrongest co-occurrence, where larger bin sizes resglt ii rtrinner zi-ofcurrences across the whole $m_{0}$ range. In partictmat, nhis may aid in bctter modelling of tje fignal and bazkgrouus sistributions away from $m_{0}\fimeq m_W$ and $m_0 \simrq m_\phi$. On the other hand, ibcreasing thv bib size will also mcke the signcl feajures kess pronounced, potenticlly rsducing the classifidxtion power in tfe xake way as a binned likelihjod classmfier becomer wotse and worse appgoximation to the Neyman-Oearsln un-binned pikelihood. Therefore there is tcede-off here bgtwaen potenticl claxsification pjwer and the ayility oy VI tu extract kptimal theme distwibutions frok the data. In particujar qe fund thag the constant $\celta m_0 = 10$ GeV bin suze provides the bcst ttase-off for the ercmklws satudied hete xnd id elso yt practice cnose to yhe vxriable binkine $\dekta m_0 = 0.05 m_0$ mimicking dhe fypical (energy) resplmtion of nodern pwrticle detecyor calorimeters.

Undupertised uearnong with LDA {#sec:ldaresults}
==============================

As our jain resupt re present tro aiplisations of the technique outlined in the precedinj sections. Using the twi benchmark examplex discussed mn Sec. \[sec:bm1\] ang Sec. \[sec:bm2\] we consteuct various mixec event samples, i.e. mistures of bwckground and signal events. For the boosted $t\bar{t}$ example we construct mized samples with $9\tjmes 10^4$ evettf, and wyth D/U ratios: $
use in practice due to the finite however still serve useful examples to varying sizes in the In the upper plot we show the co-occurrences for whole mixed sample with S/B=$5\%$ and four different choices of bin sizes. In of the other three plots we then show the co-occurrences for different numbers signal (again $500$, $1000$) and varying bin sizes. As expected, larger bin sizes result in stronger co-occurrences, however the of this effect is not as large as effect of removing observables the analysis completely. For example, all the strength the at m_W$ is almost same for all choices of the binning. The effect due to different bin sizes is more clearly away from of strongest where bin result in stronger the whole $m_{0}$ range. In particular, in better modelling of the signal and background away from m_W$ and $m_0 \simeq m_\phi$. On other hand, increasing the bin size will also the signal features less pronounced, potentially reducing the classification power in the same way as likelihood classifier becomes worse worse approximation to Neyman-Pearson likelihood. there trade-off here potential classification power and the ability of VI to extract optimal distributions from the data. In particular we find that the m_0 10$ GeV bin provides the best trade-off the satudied here and is practice to $\delta = m_0$ mimicking the typical resolution of modern particle detector Unsupervised learning with LDA result we present two applications of the technique in the preceding sections. Using the two examples discussed in Sec. \[sec:bm1\] and Sec. \[sec:bm2\] we construct various mixed samples, i.e. background and signal events. For the boosted $t\bar{t}$ we construct mixed samples $9\times 10^4$ events, and with S/B ratios: $
 use in practice due to the finiTe experimeNtal rEsoLutIoN, howEver They still serve AS useFul examples to demonstraTe the PoTEntiAL eFfectS of varyINg BIN siZeS iN thE aNAlYsis. IN thE upper lEft plot we sHow ThE co-occurrencES fOr the whole MixEd sample with s/B=$5\%$ aNd four DiFfeREnt chOicEs of bIn sizeS. in each Of the otheR tHRee ploTS we then SHOw The cO-occurrences for diFFeREnt numbers of siGnal evEnTS (aGAIn $100$, $500$, aNd $1000$) aNd varying bIn Sizes. aS expectED, lARGEr bIN sizes result iN stronger co-OCcuRrenceS, hOweVEr the sIze of ThIS efFect is not as LargE as the effEct of rEMoving oBServablEs from The AnaLysiS CoMpLetElY. for EXaMplE, In aLl cases tHe StRengtH of tHE CO-OccuRreNces At $m_0\siMeq m_W$ is almost The Same FOr aLl choIces oF the BiNning. the effEct duE tO different bin siZes iS more cleaRly SeEn aWaY from THese arEas Of sTrongesT co-occuRRenCe, WHERe Larger bin sizes resuLt IN StRonger co-OccurrENcEs ACross the WhOle $M_{0}$ ranGE. in parTicuLAr, This may aId in beTTeR mOdellinG oF the siGnAl aNd bAckgrOUnd dIstribUtions awAy froM $M_{0}\simeq m_W$ and $m_0 \siMEq m_\phi$. On the otHEr HANd, INcreAsiNg the bin sizE wilL Also Make THe SigNAl feaTures LeSS pROnounced, potentially ReDucing The clAssification pOwer in the sAME Way as a biNned LIkELihood classifiEr becOmes worse aND worse apProxiMation to The Neyman-pEArson un-bInnEd lIkeLihOOD. THerefore there IS TradE-oFf here bEtwEen poteNtiAl cLasSifIcAtion poweR and the aBiLiTy Of vI tO extrACt optimaL tHemE dIstRibutIOns froM the dAta. IN pArTIcuLar we fiND tHAT the CoNsTant $\DelTa M_0 = 10$ GeV bIn siZE prOvides tHe best traDe-oFF for ThE eXamples Satudied here aNd Is also in prAcTicE close TO The variaBle binning $\delta m_0 = 0.05 m_0$ mimickINg the tyPicAl (eneRgy) rEsolution Of mOdern pArtICle detEctor cAloriMeTerS.

uNsupeRVIsEd lEaRning with Lda {#Sec:LdareSuLts}
==============================

AS our maiN result we present twO AppLications of thE teChniQUE oUtlINeD In tHe PRecEDIng sections. UsinG the two benChMArK examples dIScuSsEd in Sec. \[Sec:bm1\] anD Sec. \[sEC:bm2\] we coNstruct vaRious mixeD eVent SAMplEs, i.e. mixturEs of backGround and SIgnal EVeNts. FoR thE boostEd $T\baR{t}$ exaMple we COnsTruct Mixed sAmPles wiTh $9\timEs 10^4$ Events, anD with S/B ratios: $
 use in practice due to th e finite e xperi men tal  r esol utio n, however the y  sti ll serve as useful exa mples  t o  dem o ns trate  the po t en t i alef fe cts  o f  v aryin g b in size s in the a nal ys is. In the u p pe r left plo t w e show the c o-o ccurre nc esf or th e w holemixeds amplewith S/B= $5 \ %$ and four di f f er entchoices of bin si z es .  In each of th e othe rt hr e e  pl ots  we then s ho w the co-occu r re n c e s f o r different n umbers of s i gna l even ts  (a g ain $1 00$,$5 0 0$,  and $1000$ ) an d varying  bin s i zes. As expecte d, lar ger  bi n si z es  r esu lt ins tr ong e r c o-occurr en ce s, ho weve r t h e si zeof t his e ffect is notaslarg e  as  theeffec t of  r emovi ng obs ervab le s from the anal ysis  complete ly.  F orex ample ,  in al l c ase s the s trength ofth e c o- occurrences at $m_ 0\ s i me q m_W$ i s almo s tth e  same fo rall  cho i c es of  the bi nning. T he eff e ct  d ue to d if ferent  b insiz es is more  clear ly seenawayf rom these area s  of strongest co - o cc u rren ce,  where larg er b i n si zesr es ult in st ronge rc o- o ccurrences across t he  whole  $m_{ 0}$ range. In  particula r , this may  aid in better modelli ng of  the signa l  and bac kgrou nd distr ibutionsa w ay from$m_ {0} \si meq m _W $ and $m_0 \s i m eq m _\ phi$. O n t he othe r h and , i ncr ea sing thebin size  w il lal somaket he signa lfea tu res  less pronou nced,  pot en ti a lly  reduci n gt h e cl as si fica tio npower  int hesame wa y as a bi nne d  lik el ih ood cla ssifier becom es  worse and  w ors e appr o x imationto the Neyman-Pearson u n -binned  li kelih ood.  Therefor e t here i s t r ade-of f here  betw ee n p o t entia l cl ass if ication po w e r a nd th eabil ity ofVI to extract opti m altheme distrib uti onsf r om  th e  d a ta.  I n  pa r t icular we findthat the c on s ta nt $\delta m_0  =  10$ Ge V bin s ize p r ovidesthe besttrade-off  f or t h e  ex amples sat udied he re and is alsoi npract ice  close  t o t he va riable bin ning$\delt am_0 =0.05m_ 0$ mimic king the typical (energ y) res oluti onof modern  pa r tic le detect or c alorimeter s.
Un super vis e d lea rnin g  w ith LDA { #sec : ldaresult s }=== = = == =========== = = = === ===== =
A s ourmain  result we presen t  two applicati onso f  th e t e chni qu e outlined inthe  p r e ceding s ec tions. Usin g the tw ob enchm ark ex amples  discus s e di n Sec.  \[s ec: bm1\] and  Se c. \[sec:b m2 \] we con stru ct  vario us mix e d ev e n t samples, i.e.mixtu r e s ofb ack groun dand sig n al e vents. For  the booste d $t\b ar{t }$ ex ample w econstr uct  m ixed sampl e s with $9 \time s 10^4$  e vent s,and wi th S / B  rati os:$
 use_in practice_due to the finite_experimental resolution,_however_they still_serve_as useful examples_to demonstrate the_potential effects of varying_bin sizes in_the_analysis. In the upper left plot we show the co-occurrences for the whole mixed_sample_with S/B=$5\%$_and_four_different choices of bin sizes._In each of the other_three plots_we then show the co-occurrences for different numbers_of_signal events (again_$100$, $500$, and $1000$) and varying bin sizes. As_expected, larger bin sizes result in_stronger co-occurrences, however_the_size_of this effect is_not as large as the effect_of removing observables from the analysis_completely. For example, in all cases the_strength of the co-occurrences at $m_0\simeq_m_W$ is almost the same_for all_choices of the binning. The_effect due to_different bin_sizes is more_clearly seen away from these areas_of strongest co-occurrence,_where larger bin sizes result in_stronger_co-occurrences across the_whole_$m_{0}$_range. In_particular, this may_aid_in better_modelling_of the signal and background distributions_away_from $m_{0}\simeq m_W$ and $m_0 \simeq m_\phi$._On the other hand,_increasing_the bin size will_also make the signal features_less pronounced, potentially reducing the classification_power in_the same_way as a binned likelihood classifier becomes worse and worse approximation_to the Neyman-Pearson un-binned likelihood. Therefore_there is trade-off here_between potential_classification_power and the_ability_of VI_to extract optimal theme distributions from the_data. In_particular we find that the constant_$\delta m_0 = 10$_GeV_bin size provides the best trade-off_for the examples satudied here and_is also in practice close_to_the_variable binning $\delta m_0 =_0.05 m_0$ mimicking the typical (energy)_resolution of modern_particle detector calorimeters.

Unsupervised learning with LDA {#sec:ldaresults}
==============================

As_our_main result we present two applications_of_the technique outlined in the preceding_sections._Using_the two benchmark examples discussed_in Sec. \[sec:bm1\] and Sec. \[sec:bm2\]_we construct various mixed event samples, i.e. mixtures of_background and signal_events. For the boosted $t\bar{t}$_example_we_construct mixed samples with $9\times 10^4$ events, and with S/B_ratios: $