
 \text{ \large 0}& (1-\beta_1)D\\
\end{smallmatrix} \right)$ for suitable $l$ and $T^l$ is a scalar matrix by Lemma \[m7\]. It means that $1-\beta_1^{2}=0$ because if $B=0$ then $T$ is reducible and it can not generate ${\mathrm{Sin}}_{n_1}(q).$ So, $\beta_1=\beta_2$. If $p=2$ then $0=(1-\beta_1^{2})=(1-\beta_1)^{2}$, so $\beta_1=1$ and $\alpha_1=\alpha_2$.

Let $p>2$, we have $\beta_1=\beta_2$ and $\beta_1^2=1$, so $\alpha_1^2=\alpha_2^2.$ Note that in this case we have two possibilities:\
If $g' \in Sin_n(q)$ then by Lemma \[m7\] $g$ is scalar, so $\alpha_1 =\alpha_2$.\
If $g'=s\cdot \varphi_1$, $s \in Sin_n(q)$ then for an element $g \in Sin_n(q)$ we obtain $$\label{phi}
 g^{g'}=g^{\varphi_1}=g^q.$$ Also, $g'^2 \in {\mathrm{Sin}}_n(q)$ but $g'^2$ is diagonal, so it is scalar by Lemma \[m7\]. Thus without loss of generality we can assume that if $\alpha_1 \ne \alpha_2$ then $g'^2=1$, so $\alpha_1^2=\alpha_2^2=1$ and $\alpha_1=1$; $\alpha_2=-1$. Therefore $T^{g'}=\left(
\begin{smallmatrix}
A & -B\\
-C & D\\
\end{smallmatrix} \right)$. Thus it is sufficient to prove that there is ${\mathrm{Sin}}_2(q)$ such that $T^{g'}=\left(
\begin{smallmatrix}
A & -B\\
-C & D\\
\end{smallmatrix} \right) \ne T^q.$ Let $a\ne 1$ be an element of $F_q$ such that the equation $x^
\text { \large 0 } & (1-\beta_1)D\\ 
 \end{smallmatrix } \right)$ for suitable $ l$ and $ T^l$ is a scalar matrix by Lemma \[m7\ ]. It means that $ 1-\beta_1^{2}=0 $ because if $ B=0 $ then $ T$ is reducible and it cannot generate $ { \mathrm{Sin}}_{n_1}(q).$ So, $ \beta_1=\beta_2$. If $ p=2 $ then $ 0=(1-\beta_1^{2})=(1-\beta_1)^{2}$, therefore $ \beta_1=1 $ and $ \alpha_1=\alpha_2$. 

 lease $ p>2 $, we have $ \beta_1=\beta_2 $ and $ \beta_1 ^ 2=1 $, so $ \alpha_1 ^ 2=\alpha_2 ^ 2.$ Note that in this lawsuit we have two possibilities:\ 
 If $ g' \in Sin_n(q)$ then by Lemma \[m7\ ] $ g$ is scalar, indeed $ \alpha_1 = \alpha_2$.\ 
 If $ g'=s\cdot \varphi_1 $, $ s \in Sin_n(q)$ then for an component $ g \in Sin_n(q)$ we obtain $ $ \label{phi } 
  g^{g'}=g^{\varphi_1}=g^q.$$ Also, $ g'^2 \in { \mathrm{Sin}}_n(q)$ but $ g'^2 $ is diagonal, so it is scalar by Lemma \[m7\ ]. therefore without loss of generality we can assume that if $ \alpha_1 \ne \alpha_2 $ then $ g'^2=1 $, so $ \alpha_1 ^ 2=\alpha_2 ^ 2=1 $ and $ \alpha_1=1 $; $ \alpha_2=-1$. consequently $ T^{g'}=\left (
 \begin{smallmatrix } 
 A & -B\\ 
 -C & D\\ 
 \end{smallmatrix } \right)$. Thus it is sufficient to prove that there be $ { \mathrm{Sin}}_2(q)$ such that $ T^{g'}=\left (
 \begin{smallmatrix } 
 A & -B\\ 
 -C & D\\ 
 \end{smallmatrix } \right) \ne T^q.$ Let $ a\ne 1 $ be an element of $ F_q$ such that the equality $ x^

 \tedt{ \large 0}& (1-\beta_1)D\\
\end{smallmxtrix} \right)$ for suitabne $l$ ahd $T^l$ is a scalar matrix by Lemma \[m7\]. Mt mwans ukat $1-\beta_1^{2}=0$ because if $C=0$ then $T$ ps reducivle end it can not gxherate ${\mathrm{Aln}}_{n_1}(q).$ Vi, $\beta_1=\beta_2$. If $k=2$ then $0=(1-\beta_1^{2})=(1-\bata_1)^{2}$, so $\beta_1=1$ ang $\xl'ha_1=\alpha_2$.

Let $p>2$, we have $\beta_1=\beta_2$ and $\bqta_1^2=1$, so $\sloha_1^2=\alpha_2^2.$ Note jhat pn thia case we have two possibilities:\
If $g' \in Spn_n(q)$ then by Lemms \[m7\] $g$ is scalar, so $\alpha_1 =\appha_2$.\
Lf $g'=s\cdot \varphi_1$, $s \in Sin_n(q)$ tyen sir an elemeng $g \in Sin_n(q)$ we obtain $$\label{phi}
 g^{g'}=g^{\varphi_1}=g^q.$$ Also, $g'^2 \in {\mathxm{Sin}}_n(q)$ but $g'^2$ is giagonal, so it if scalar by Lemma \[m7\]. Dhus wiyhout loss of nenerelitt we can assume that mf $\alpha_1 \ne \alpha_2$ thgn $g'^2=1$, so $\al[hc_1^2=\alpha_2^2=1$ and $\alpha_1=1$; $\alphq_2=-1$. Rherexore $T^{g'}=\lddt(
\bdgih{skamlmatrlx}
A & -B\\
-C & D\\
\end{amallmatrix} \right)$. Thus it is sifspvient to probe thae ehere is ${\mathrm{Sin}}_2(q)$ such that $T^{g'}=\left(
\begpn{smzllmatrix}
A & -B\\
-C & D\\
\end{smaolmatrix} \right) \ne T^q.$ Pet $a\ne 1$ fe an element of $F_q$ such that the equation $x^
\text{ \large 0}& (1-\beta_1)D\\ \end{smallmatrix} \right)$ for and is a matrix by Lemma because $B=0$ then $T$ reducible and it not generate ${\mathrm{Sin}}_{n_1}(q).$ So, $\beta_1=\beta_2$. If then $0=(1-\beta_1^{2})=(1-\beta_1)^{2}$, so $\beta_1=1$ and $\alpha_1=\alpha_2$. Let $p>2$, we have $\beta_1=\beta_2$ and $\beta_1^2=1$, $\alpha_1^2=\alpha_2^2.$ Note that in this case we have two possibilities:\ If $g' \in then Lemma $g$ scalar, so $\alpha_1 =\alpha_2$.\ If $g'=s\cdot \varphi_1$, $s \in Sin_n(q)$ then for an element $g \in we obtain $$\label{phi} g^{g'}=g^{\varphi_1}=g^q.$$ Also, $g'^2 \in {\mathrm{Sin}}_n(q)$ $g'^2$ is diagonal, so is scalar by Lemma \[m7\]. without of generality can that $\alpha_1 \ne \alpha_2$ $g'^2=1$, so $\alpha_1^2=\alpha_2^2=1$ and $\alpha_1=1$; $\alpha_2=-1$. Therefore $T^{g'}=\left( \begin{smallmatrix} A & -B\\ -C & D\\ \end{smallmatrix} \right)$. it is prove that is such $T^{g'}=\left( \begin{smallmatrix} A -C & D\\ \end{smallmatrix} \right) \ne 1$ be an element of $F_q$ such that equation $x^

 \text{ \large 0}& (1-\beta_1)D\\
\end{smallmatRix} \right)$ foR suitAblE $l$ aNd $t^l$ is A scaLar matrix by LemMA \[m7\]. It Means that $1-\beta_1^{2}=0$ because if $b=0$ then $t$ iS ReduCIbLe and It can noT GeNERatE ${\mAtHrm{siN}}_{N_1}(q).$ so, $\betA_1=\beTa_2$. If $p=2$ thEn $0=(1-\beta_1^{2})=(1-\beta_1)^{2}$, So $\bEtA_1=1$ and $\alpha_1=\alpHA_2$.

LEt $p>2$, we have $\bEta_1=\Beta_2$ and $\beta_1^2=1$, sO $\alPha_1^2=\alpHa_2^2.$ notE That iN thIs casE we havE Two posSibilitieS:\
IF $G' \in Sin_N(Q)$ then by lEMmA \[m7\] $g$ iS scalar, so $\alpha_1 =\alpHA_2$.\
IF $G'=s\cdot \varphi_1$, $s \iN Sin_n(q)$ ThEN fOR An eLemEnt $g \in Sin_n(Q)$ wE obtaIN $$\label{pHI}
 g^{G'}=G^{\VArpHI_1}=g^q.$$ Also, $g'^2 \in {\matHrm{Sin}}_n(q)$ but $G'^2$ Is dIagonaL, sO it IS scalaR by LeMmA \[M7\]. ThUs without loSs of GeneralitY we can ASsume thAT if $\alphA_1 \ne \alpHa_2$ tHen $G'^2=1$, so $\aLPhA_1^2=\aLphA_2^2=1$ aND $\alPHa_1=1$; $\AlpHA_2=-1$. ThErefore $T^{G'}=\lEfT(
\begiN{smaLLMATrix}
a & -B\\
-C & d\\
\end{SmallMatrix} \right)$. ThUs iT is sUFfiCient To proVe thAt There Is ${\mathRm{Sin}}_2(Q)$ sUch that $T^{g'}=\left(
\beGin{sMallmatriX}
A & -B\\
-c & D\\
\End{SmAllmaTRix} \rigHt) \nE T^q.$ let $a\ne 1$ bE an elemENt oF $F_Q$ SUCh That the equation $x^

 \text{ \large 0}& (1-\be ta_1)D\\
\ end{s mal lma tr ix}\rig ht)$ for suita b le $ l$ and $T^l$ is a scal ar ma tr i x by Le mma \ [m7\].I tm e ans  t ha t $ 1- \ be ta_1^ {2} =0$ bec ause if $B =0$  t hen $T$ is r e du cible anditcan not gene rat e ${\m at hrm { Sin}} _{n _1}(q ).$ So ,  $\bet a_1=\beta _2 $ . If $ p =2$ the n $0 =(1- \beta_1^{2})=(1-\ b et a _1)^{2}$, so $ \beta_ 1= 1 $a n d $ \al pha_1=\alp ha _2$.Let $p> 2 $, w e  ha v e $\beta_1=\b eta_2$ and$ \be ta_1^2 =1 $,s o $\al pha_1 ^2 = \al pha_2^2.$ N otethat in t his ca s e we ha v e two p ossibi lit ies :\
I f  $ g'  \i nS in_ n (q )$t hen  by Lemm a\[ m7\]$g$i s s cala r,so $ \alph a_1 =\alpha_2 $.\ 
If$ g'= s\cdo t \va rphi _1 $, $s  \in S in_n( q) $ then for an e leme nt $g \in  Si n_ n(q )$  we o b tain $ $\l abe l{phi} g^{g'} = g^{ \v a r p hi _1}=g^q.$$ Also, $ g' ^ 2  \ in {\mat hrm{Si n }} _n ( q)$ but$g '^2 $ is d iagon al,s oit is sc alar b y  L em ma \[m7 \] . Thus  w ith out  loss of g eneral ity we c an as s ume that if $\ a lpha_1 \ne \a l ph a _ 2$ then  $g '^2=1$, so$\al p ha_1 ^2=\ a lp ha_ 2 ^2=1$  and$\ a lp h a_1=1$; $\alpha_2=- 1$ . Ther efore  $T^{g'}=\lef t(
\begin{ s m a llmatrix }
A&  - B \\
-C & D\\
\e nd{sm allmatrix} \right)$ . Thu s it issufficien t to prove  th atthe rei s  $ {\mathrm{Sin} } _ 2(q) $such th at$T^{g'} =\l eft (
\ beg in {smallmat rix}
A &  - B\ \-C  &D\\
\ e nd{small ma tri x}  \r ight) \ne T^ q.$ L et $ a\ ne 1$be an e l em e n t of  $ F_ q$ s uch  t hat t he e q uat ion $x^ 

 \text{_\large 0}&_(1-\beta_1)D\\
\end{smallmatrix} \right)$ for suitable_$l$ and_$T^l$_is a_scalar_matrix by Lemma_\[m7\]. It means_that $1-\beta_1^{2}=0$ because if_$B=0$ then $T$_is_reducible and it can not generate ${\mathrm{Sin}}_{n_1}(q).$ So, $\beta_1=\beta_2$. If $p=2$ then $0=(1-\beta_1^{2})=(1-\beta_1)^{2}$, so_$\beta_1=1$_and $\alpha_1=\alpha_2$.

Let_$p>2$,_we_have $\beta_1=\beta_2$ and $\beta_1^2=1$, so_$\alpha_1^2=\alpha_2^2.$ Note that in this_case we_have two possibilities:\
If $g' \in Sin_n(q)$ then by_Lemma_\[m7\] $g$ is_scalar, so $\alpha_1 =\alpha_2$.\
If $g'=s\cdot \varphi_1$, $s \in Sin_n(q)$_then for an element $g \in_Sin_n(q)$ we obtain_$$\label{phi}
_g^{g'}=g^{\varphi_1}=g^q.$$_Also, $g'^2 \in {\mathrm{Sin}}_n(q)$_but $g'^2$ is diagonal, so it_is scalar by Lemma \[m7\]. Thus_without loss of generality we can assume_that if $\alpha_1 \ne \alpha_2$ then_$g'^2=1$, so $\alpha_1^2=\alpha_2^2=1$ and $\alpha_1=1$;_$\alpha_2=-1$. Therefore_$T^{g'}=\left(
\begin{smallmatrix}
A & -B\\
-C & D\\
\end{smallmatrix}_\right)$. Thus it_is sufficient_to prove that_there is ${\mathrm{Sin}}_2(q)$ such that $T^{g'}=\left(
\begin{smallmatrix}
A_& -B\\
-C &_D\\
\end{smallmatrix} \right) \ne T^q.$ Let $a\ne_1$_be an element_of_$F_q$_such that_the equation $x^