$ is then at most $\lambda_a-2$. In the latter case, $ab$ anticommutes with itself, meaning that $a$ and $b$ have the same charge. This violates (iii).

It remains to show that the boundary operators coincide. Consider the $i$th term $\epsilon_i = (-1)^i\cdot x_0y_0 \wedge \cdots \wedge \hat{x_iy_i}
    \wedge x_dy_d$ in the boundary of $\hat{\gamma}$ in $\mathcal{C}({\mathsf{M}_{N}};R)$. Write $\delta_i = [\epsilon_i]$. If $a_i \neq b_i$, then let $(z_1 = x_i, z_2, \ldots, z_q)$ be the sequence of elements appearing in $U_{a_i} \cap \{x_j,y_j : i \le j \le d\}$ and let $(z'_1 = y_i, z'_2, \ldots, z'_{q'})$ be the sequence of elements appearing in $U_{b_i} \cap \{x_j,y_j : i \le j \le d\}$, arranged in increasing order. To obtain the lexicographically smallest element $\hat{\delta_i}$ from $\epsilon_i$, we need to act on $\epsilon_i$ with the permutation $(z_q, \cdots, z_2, z_1)(z'_{q'}, \cdots, z'_2,
    z'_1)$. There are three cases.

-   $a_i$ and $b_i$ are both negatively charged. By construction, $a_ib_i$ appears only once in $\gamma$, meaning that there are $q+q'-2$ edges $a_jb_j$ commuting with $a_ib_i$ such that $j>i$; hence $\eta_i = d-i-(q+q'-2)$, where $\eta_i$ is the number of indices $j > i$ such that $a_ib_i$ and $a_jb_j$ anticommute. We conclude that the sign of $\hat{\delta_i}$ equals $(-1)^{i+q+q'-2} = (-1)^{d-\eta_i}$, which aligns with (\[partial-eq\]).

$ is then at most $ \lambda_a-2$. In the latter case, $ ab$ anticommutes with itself, meaning that $ a$ and $ b$ have the like cathexis. This violates (iii). 

 It remains to picture that the boundary operator coincide. Consider the $ i$th terminus $ \epsilon_i = (-1)^i\cdot x_0y_0 \wedge \cdots \wedge \hat{x_iy_i } 
     \wedge x_dy_d$ in the limit of $ \hat{\gamma}$ in $ \mathcal{C}({\mathsf{M}_{N}};R)$. Write $ \delta_i = [ \epsilon_i]$. If $ a_i \neq b_i$, then let $ (z_1 = x_i, z_2, \ldots, z_q)$ be the sequence of elements appearing in $ U_{a_i } \cap \{x_j, y_j: i \le j \le d\}$ and lease $ (z'_1 = y_i, z'_2, \ldots, z'_{q'})$ be the sequence of elements appear in $ U_{b_i } \cap \{x_j, y_j: i \le j \le d\}$, arranged in increasing order. To obtain the lexicographically smallest component $ \hat{\delta_i}$ from $ \epsilon_i$, we need to act on $ \epsilon_i$ with the permutation $ (z_q, \cdots, z_2, z_1)(z'_{q' }, \cdots, z'_2, 
     z'_1)$. There exist three cases. 

 -    $ a_i$ and $ b_i$ are both negatively charged. By construction, $ a_ib_i$ appears merely once in $ \gamma$, meaning that there are $ q+q'-2 $ edges $ a_jb_j$ commuting with $ a_ib_i$ such that $ j > i$; hence $ \eta_i = vitamin d - i-(q+q'-2)$, where $ \eta_i$ is the number of indices $ j > i$ such that $ a_ib_i$ and $ a_jb_j$ anticommute. We conclude that the sign of $ \hat{\delta_i}$ equals $ (-1)^{i+q+q'-2 } = (-1)^{d-\eta_i}$, which aligns with (\[partial - eq\ ]).
$ is then at most $\lambda_a-2$. In the latter casg, $qb$ antmcommutss with ktself, meaning that $a$ and $b$ iave the wame charge. This violages (iii).

It remains to wyow that tis boundary opsvatorv coincide. Conslder the $i$tv term $\epsilon_h = (-1)^i\edot x_0y_0 \wedge \cdots \wedge \hat{x_iy_i}
    \wedge c_dj_d$ in the bounqary jf $\hzn{\gcmma}$ in $\mathcal{C}({\mathsf{M}_{N}};R)$. Write $\delta_i = [\epsilon_i]$. If $a_i \neq b_i$, then let $(z_1 = x_i, x_2, \ldlts, z_q)$ be the sequfnce of elenentf appearing iv $U_{a_i} \cap \{q_l,y_j : i \le j \le d\}$ and let $(z'_1 = y_i, z'_2, \ldots, z'_{q'})$ ce thz sequence if elfkents appeacing ig $U_{b_i} \cap \{x_j,n_k : i \la j \le c\}$, arranged in lncreesint order. To obtain the lexicographically smallest emement $\hat{\delta_i}$ drim $\epvilot_i$, wd nedd uo ect on $\epdilkn_i$ with tge permutatuon $(z_q, \cdots, z_2, z_1)(z'_{q'}, \vdjnx, z'_2,
    z'_1)$. Thede are trree cases.

-   $a_i$ and $b_i$ are both negativtly cgarged. By construction, $q_ib_i$ appears only oncg in $\gamma$, meaning that there are $q+q'-2$ edges $a_jb_j$ commuting whth $a_mb_k$ sbgm thxr $u>i$; hence $\eta_i = d-i-(q+q'-2)$, where $\eta_i$ is the number jr oncices $j > i$ sucm that $a_ib_i$ and $a_jn_j$ amjicommute. We cuncludz tgat the sign of $\hah{\delta_i}$ equaos $(-1)^{i+q+q'-2} = (-1)^{d-\tta_i}$, ehich aligns with (\[partial-eq\]).

$ is then at most $\lambda_a-2$. In case, anticommutes with meaning that $a$ charge. violates (iii). It to show that boundary operators coincide. Consider the $i$th $\epsilon_i = (-1)^i\cdot x_0y_0 \wedge \cdots \wedge \hat{x_iy_i} \wedge x_dy_d$ in the boundary $\hat{\gamma}$ in $\mathcal{C}({\mathsf{M}_{N}};R)$. Write $\delta_i = [\epsilon_i]$. If $a_i \neq b_i$, then let = z_2, z_q)$ the sequence of elements appearing in $U_{a_i} \cap \{x_j,y_j : i \le j \le d\}$ and $(z'_1 = y_i, z'_2, \ldots, z'_{q'})$ be the of elements appearing in \cap \{x_j,y_j : i \le \le arranged in order. obtain lexicographically smallest element from $\epsilon_i$, we need to act on $\epsilon_i$ with the permutation $(z_q, \cdots, z_2, z_1)(z'_{q'}, \cdots, z'_2, There are - $a_i$ $b_i$ both charged. By construction, only once in $\gamma$, meaning that edges $a_jb_j$ commuting with $a_ib_i$ such that $j>i$; $\eta_i = where $\eta_i$ is the number of $j > i$ such that $a_ib_i$ and $a_jb_j$ We conclude that the sign of $\hat{\delta_i}$ equals $(-1)^{i+q+q'-2} = (-1)^{d-\eta_i}$, which aligns with (\[partial-eq\]).
$ is then at most $\lambda_a-2$. In the lAtter case, $aB$ antiComMutEs With ItseLf, meaning that $a$ ANd $b$ hAve the same charge. This viOlateS (iII).

It rEMaIns to Show thaT ThE BOunDaRy OpeRaTOrS coinCidE. ConsidEr the $i$th teRm $\ePsIlon_i = (-1)^i\cdot x_0y_0 \WEdGe \cdots \wedGe \hAt{x_iy_i}
    \wedge x_Dy_d$ In the bOuNdaRY of $\haT{\gaMma}$ in $\MathcaL{c}({\mathsF{M}_{N}};R)$. Write $\DeLTa_i = [\epsILon_i]$. If $a_I \NEq B_i$, thEn let $(z_1 = x_i, z_2, \ldots, z_q)$ bE ThE Sequence of elemEnts apPeARiNG In $U_{A_i} \cAp \{x_j,y_j : i \le j \Le D\}$ and lET $(z'_1 = y_i, z'_2, \ldOTs, Z'_{Q'})$ BE thE Sequence of eleMents appearINg iN $U_{b_i} \caP \{x_J,y_j : I \Le j \le d\}$, ArranGeD In iNcreasing orDer. TO obtain thE lexicOGraphicALly smalLest elEmeNt $\hAt{\deLTa_I}$ fRom $\EpSIloN_I$, wE neED to Act on $\epsIlOn_I$ with The pERMUTatiOn $(z_Q, \cdoTs, z_2, z_1)(z'_{Q'}, \cdots, z'_2,
    z'_1)$. There Are ThreE CasEs.

-   $a_i$ aNd $b_i$ aRe boTh NegatIvely cHargeD. BY construction, $a_iB_i$ apPears only OncE iN $\gaMmA$, meanINg that TheRe aRe $q+q'-2$ edgEs $a_jb_j$ cOMmuTiNG WItH $a_ib_i$ such that $j>i$; henCe $\ETA_i = D-i-(q+q'-2)$, wherE $\eta_i$ iS ThE nUMber of inDiCes $J > i$ suCH That $a_Ib_i$ aND $a_Jb_j$ anticOmmute. wE cOnClude thAt The sigN oF $\haT{\deLta_i}$ eQUals $(-1)^{I+q+q'-2} = (-1)^{d-\etA_i}$, which aLigns WIth (\[partial-eq\]).

$ is then at most $\lambda _a-2$. Inthe l att erca se,$ab$  anticommutesw ithitself, meaning that $ a$ an d$ b$ h a ve  thesame ch a rg e .  Th is  v iol at e s(iii) .
It rema ins to sho w t ha t the bounda r yoperatorscoi ncide. Consi der  the $ i$ tht erm $ \ep silon _i = ( - 1)^i\c dot x_0y_ 0\ wedge\ cdots \ w e dg e \h at{x_iy_i}
    \w e dg e  x_dy_d$ in th e boun da r yo f  $\ hat {\gamma}$in  $\ma t hcal{C} ( {\ m a t hsf { M}_{N}};R)$.Write $\del t a_i  = [\e ps ilo n _i]$.If $a _i \ne q b_i$, the n le t $(z_1 =  x_i,z _2, \ld o ts, z_q )$ bethe  se quen c eof  el em e nts ap pea r ing  in $U_{ a_ i}  \cap  \{x _ j , y _j :  i\lej \le  d\}$ and let  $( z'_1 = y _i, z '_2,\ldo ts , z'_ {q'})$  be t he  sequence of el emen ts appear ing  i n $ U_ {b_i} \cap \ {x_ j,y _j : i\le j \ l e d \} $ , ar ranged in increasi ng o rd er. To o btaint he  l e xicograp hi cal ly s m a llest  ele m en t $\hat{ \delta _ i} $from $\ ep silon_ i$ , w e n eed t o  act  on $\ epsilon_ i$ wi t h the permutat i on $(z_q, \cd o ts , z_ 2 , z_ 1)( z'_{q'}, \c dots ,  z'_ 2,
 z'_ 1 )$. T herear e  t h ree cases.

-   $a_ i$  and $ b_i$are both nega tively cha r g e d. By co nstr u ct i on, $a_ib_i$ a ppear s only onc e  in $\ga mma$,  meaning  that the r e  are $q+ q'- 2$edg es$ a _j b_j$ commutin g with  $ a_ib_i$  su ch that  $j >i$ ; h enc e$\eta_i =  d-i-(q+ q' -2 )$ ,whe re $\ e ta_i$ is  t henu mbe r ofi ndices  $j >  i$su ch tha t $a_ib _ i$ a nd $ a_ jb _j$ant ic ommut e. W e  co ncludethat thesig n  of$\ ha t{\delt a_i}$ equals$( -1)^{i+q+q '- 2}= (-1) ^ { d-\eta_i }$, which aligns with ( \ [partia l-e q\]). 

$ is_then at_most $\lambda_a-2$. In the_latter case,_$ab$_anticommutes with_itself,_meaning that $a$_and $b$ have_the same charge. This_violates (iii).

It remains_to_show that the boundary operators coincide. Consider the $i$th term $\epsilon_i = (-1)^i\cdot x_0y_0_\wedge_\cdots \wedge_\hat{x_iy_i}
__  \wedge x_dy_d$ in_the boundary of $\hat{\gamma}$ in_$\mathcal{C}({\mathsf{M}_{N}};R)$. Write_$\delta_i = [\epsilon_i]$. If $a_i \neq b_i$, then_let_$(z_1 = x_i,_z_2, \ldots, z_q)$ be the sequence of elements appearing_in $U_{a_i} \cap \{x_j,y_j : i_\le j \le_d\}$_and_let $(z'_1 = y_i,_z'_2, \ldots, z'_{q'})$ be the sequence_of elements appearing in $U_{b_i} \cap_\{x_j,y_j : i \le j \le d\}$,_arranged in increasing order. To obtain_the lexicographically smallest element $\hat{\delta_i}$_from $\epsilon_i$,_we need to act on_$\epsilon_i$ with the_permutation $(z_q,_\cdots, z_2, z_1)(z'_{q'},_\cdots, z'_2,
    z'_1)$._There are three_cases.

-   $a_i$ and $b_i$_are_both negatively charged._By_construction,_$a_ib_i$ appears_only once in_$\gamma$,_meaning that_there_are $q+q'-2$ edges $a_jb_j$ commuting with_$a_ib_i$_such that $j>i$; hence $\eta_i = d-i-(q+q'-2)$,_where $\eta_i$ is the_number_of indices $j >_i$ such that $a_ib_i$ and_$a_jb_j$ anticommute. We conclude that the_sign of_$\hat{\delta_i}$ equals_$(-1)^{i+q+q'-2} = (-1)^{d-\eta_i}$, which aligns with (\[partial-eq\]).
