, allowing molecules to become shielded from photodissociating radiation and altering the cooling properties of the primordial gas (see Johnson et al. 2007).](f1.eps){width="12cm"}

Mechanical Feedback
-------------------

Numerical simulations have indicated that Pop III.1 stars might become as massive as $500~\rm{M}_{\odot}$ (Omukai & Palla 2003; Bromm & Loeb 2004; Yoshida et al. 2006; O’Shea & Norman 2007). After their main-sequence lifetimes of typically $2-3~\rm{Myr}$, stars with masses below $\simeq 100~\rm{M}_{\odot}$ are thought to collapse directly to black holes without significant metal ejection, while in the range $\simeq 140-260~\rm{M}_{\odot}$ a pair-instability supernova (PISN) disrupts the entire progenitor, with explosion energies ranging from $10^{51}-10^{53}~\rm{ergs}$, and yields of order $50\%$ (Heger & Woosley 2002; Heger et al. 2003). Less massive primordial stars with a high degree of angular momentum might explode with similar energies, but as jet-like hypernovae (Umeda & Nomoto 2002; Tominaga et al. 2007). The significant mechanical and chemical feedback effects exerted by such explosions have been investigated with a number of detailed calculations, but these were either performed in one dimension (Salvaterra 2004; Kitayama & Yoshida 2005; Machida et al. 2005; Whalen et al 2008b), or did not start from realistic initial conditions (Bromm et al. 2003; Norman et al. 2004). Recent work treated the full three-dimensional problem in a cosmological context at the cost of limited resolution, finding that the SN remnant propagated for a Hubble time at $z\simeq 20$ to a final mass-weighted mean shock radius of $2.5~\rm{kpc}$, roughly half the size of the H [ii]{} region (Greif et al. 2007). Due to the high explosion energy, the host halo was entirely evacuated. Additional simulations in the absence of a SN explosion were performed to investigate the effect of photoheating and the impact of the SN shock on neighboring minihalos. For the case discussed in Greif et al. (2007), the SN remnant exerted positive mechanical feedback on neighboring minihalos by shock-compressing their cores, while photo
, allowing molecules to become shielded from photodissociating radiation and altering the cool place of the primordial gas (see Johnson et al. 2007).](f1.eps){width="12 cm " } 

 Mechanical Feedback 
 ------------------- 

 Numerical simulation have indicated that Pop   III.1 stars might become equally massive as $ 500~\rm{M}_{\odot}$ (Omukai & Palla 2003; Bromm & Loeb 2004; Yoshida et al. 2006; O’Shea & Norman 2007). After their main - sequence lifetimes of typically $ 2 - 3~\rm{Myr}$, star with masses below $ \simeq 100~\rm{M}_{\odot}$ are thought to crack up directly to black fix without significant metal ejection, while in the range $ \simeq 140 - 260~\rm{M}_{\odot}$ a pair - imbalance supernova (PISN) disrupts the entire progenitor, with explosion energy ranging from $ 10^{51}-10^{53}~\rm{ergs}$, and yields of holy order $ 50\%$ (Heger & Woosley 2002; Heger et al. 2003). Less massive primordial star with a high degree of angular momentum might explode with similar energies, but as k - like hypernovae (Umeda & Nomoto 2002; Tominaga et al. 2007). The significant mechanical and chemical feedback effects exerted by such explosions have been investigated with a number of detailed calculations, but these were either performed in one dimension (Salvaterra 2004; Kitayama & Yoshida 2005; Machida et al. 2005; Whalen et al 2008b), or did not start from realistic initial conditions (Bromm et al. 2003; Norman et al. 2004). Recent work treated the full three - dimensional trouble in a cosmologic context at the cost of circumscribed settlement, discover that the SN remnant propagated for a Hubble meter at $ z\simeq 20 $ to a final mass - weighted mean jolt radius of $ 2.5~\rm{kpc}$, roughly half the size of the H   [ ii ] { } region (Greif et al. 2007). Due to the high explosion energy, the master of ceremonies halo was entirely evacuated. Additional model in the absence of a SN explosion were perform to investigate the effect of photoheating and the impact of the SN shock on neighboring minihalos. For the case discussed in Greif et al. (2007), the SN leftover exerted positive mechanical feedback on neighboring minihalos by jolt - compressing their cores, while photo
, alpowing molecules to becooe shielded from photovissocizting raaiation and altering the coopibg priperties of the primoraial gas (dee Johnwon tt al. 2007).](f1.eps){width="12cm"}

Mechanical Feesnack
-------------------

Nbmxrical simulatipns have itdicated that [oo INI.1 stars might become as massive as $500~\wm{M}_{\odot}$ (Olukai & Palla 2003; Fromk & Losb 2004; Yoshida et al. 2006; O’Shea & Norman 2007). Zfter tieir main-sequenve lifetimes of typically $2-3~\gm{Myg}$, stars with massed below $\simgs 100~\ri{N}_{\odot}$ are thuught to collapse diredtly to black holes without sigvificcnt metal ehextilt, while in vhe ragge $\simeq 140-260~\rm{M}_{\odot}$ a [air-insyability superkova ('ISN) disrupts the entire 'rogenitor, with expljsion enesgnes ranging from $10^{51}-10^{53}~\rm{erts}$, and iieldv of irddr $50\%$ (Hxged & Woodleb 2002; Heger et al. 2003). Less mqssive primordial suarf with a high segree os angular momentum might explode with spmilzr energies, but as jet-luke hypernovae (Umeda & Nomoto 2002; Eominaga et al. 2007). The significant mechanical and chamicam fetdnwzj fffects exerted by such explosions have been yhvtstpgated with a numner of detailed cakcklsjions, but thesg were zjtger performed in oje dimegsion (Salvaterwa 2004; Litayama & Yoshida 2005; Machida wt al. 2005; Whaleu er al 2008b), or did not dtart from xealisjic inotial conditions (Bromm zt al. 2003; Norman et wl. 2004). Recenf work treated thd flll dhree-dimtvsional problem ig a cosmooogieal contdxt st the cost of llmited resolution, findinh thaj the VN remnant propagated for a Hubble time av $z\simeq 20$ to s xindl mass-wzightec mean shock wadius of $2.5~\rm{kpe}$, roughlv half the size kf the I [ii]{} region (Gweif et al. 2007). Dgg to the high explosijn ebergt, the hurt halo was enyirely evceuated. Adeitional simulatioks in fhe absence of c WN explosion wete oersogmev to ytvestigate tve ewfezy of ohotoheatinn avd tne impact of the SN vhoci on neighboring monlhalos. Fot the casq discussed im Greif et al. (2007), the SN rxmnant exeryed positive mechanical feedback kn neighblrikg minihalos fy smock-sompressiny their cores, while photo
, allowing molecules to become shielded from and the cooling of the primordial 2007).](f1.eps){width="12cm"} Feedback ------------------- Numerical have indicated that III.1 stars might become as massive $500~\rm{M}_{\odot}$ (Omukai & Palla 2003; Bromm & Loeb 2004; Yoshida et al. 2006; & Norman 2007). After their main-sequence lifetimes of typically $2-3~\rm{Myr}$, stars with masses $\simeq are to directly to black holes without significant metal ejection, while in the range $\simeq 140-260~\rm{M}_{\odot}$ a pair-instability (PISN) disrupts the entire progenitor, with explosion energies from $10^{51}-10^{53}~\rm{ergs}$, and yields order $50\%$ (Heger & Woosley Heger al. 2003). massive stars a high degree angular momentum might explode with similar energies, but as jet-like hypernovae (Umeda & Nomoto 2002; Tominaga et 2007). The and chemical effects by explosions have been a number of detailed calculations, but performed in one dimension (Salvaterra 2004; Kitayama & 2005; Machida al. 2005; Whalen et al 2008b), did not start from realistic initial conditions (Bromm al. 2003; Norman et al. 2004). Recent work treated the full three-dimensional problem in a at the cost of resolution, finding that SN propagated a time at 20$ to a final mass-weighted mean shock radius of $2.5~\rm{kpc}$, roughly the size of the H [ii]{} region (Greif et al. to high explosion energy, host halo was entirely Additional in the absence of explosion performed effect photoheating the impact of the shock on neighboring minihalos. For case discussed in Greif remnant exerted positive mechanical feedback on neighboring minihalos shock-compressing their cores, while photo
, allowing molecules to become Shielded frOm phoTodIssOcIatiNg raDiation and alteRIng tHe cooling properties of tHe priMoRDial GAs (See JoHnson et AL. 2007).](f1.EPS){wiDtH="12cM"}

MeChANiCal FeEdbAck
-------------------

NumeRical simulAtiOnS have indicatED tHat Pop III.1 sTarS might become As mAssive As $500~\Rm{M}_{\ODot}$ (OmUkaI & PallA 2003; Bromm & lOeb 2004; YosHida et al. 2006; O’shEA & NormaN 2007). after thEIR mAin-sEquence lifetimes oF TyPIcally $2-3~\rm{Myr}$, staRs with MaSSeS BEloW $\siMeq 100~\rm{M}_{\odot}$ ArE thouGHt to colLApSE DIreCTly to black holEs without siGNifIcant mEtAl eJEction, While In THe rAnge $\simeq 140-260~\rm{m}_{\odoT}$ a pair-insTabiliTY supernOVa (PISN) dIsruptS thE enTire PRoGeNitOr, WIth EXpLosIOn eNergies rAnGiNg froM $10^{51}-10^{53}~\rm{eRGS}$, ANd yiEldS of oRder $50\%$ (HEger & Woosley 2002; HeGer Et al. 2003). lEss MassiVe priMordIaL starS with a High dEgRee of angular momEntuM might expLodE wIth SiMilar ENergieS, buT as Jet-like HypernoVAe (UMeDA & nOmOto 2002; Tominaga et al. 2007). The SiGNIfIcant mecHanicaL AnD cHEmical feEdBacK effECTs exeRted BY sUch exploSions hAVe BeEn invesTiGated wItH a nUmbEr of dETailEd calcUlations, But thESe were either peRFormed in one diMEnSIOn (sAlvaTerRa 2004; Kitayama & YOshiDA 2005; MacHida ET aL. 2005; WhALen et Al 2008b), or DiD NoT Start from realistic iNiTial coNditiOns (Bromm et al. 2003; NOrman et al. 2004). RECENt work trEateD ThE Full three-dimenSionaL problem in A CosmologIcal cOntext at The cost of LIMited resOluTioN, fiNdiNG ThAt the SN remnanT PRopaGaTed for a hubBle time At $z\SimEq 20$ tO a fInAl mass-weiGhted meaN sHoCk RaDiuS of $2.5~\rm{KPc}$, roughlY hAlf ThE siZe of tHE H [ii]{} reGion (GReif Et Al. 2007). dUe tO the higH ExPLOsioN eNeRgy, tHe hOsT halo Was eNTirEly evacUated. AddiTioNAl siMuLaTions in The absence of a sN Explosion wErE peRformeD TO investiGate the effect of photoheaTIng and tHe iMpact Of thE SN shock oN neIghborIng MInihalOs. For tHe casE dIscUSSed in gREiF et Al. (2007), The SN remnaNT ExeRted pOsItivE mechanIcal feedback on neigHBorIng minihalos bY shOck-cOMPrEssINg THeiR cORes, WHIle photo
, allowing molecules to be come shiel ded f rom  ph ot odis soci ating radiatio n  and  altering the coolingprope rt i es o f  t he pr imordia l  g a s  (s ee  J ohn so n  e t al.  20 07).](f 1.eps){wid th= "1 2cm"}

Mecha n ic al Feedbac k
- ------------ --- ---

N um eri c al si mul ation s have indica ted thatPo p  III.1 stars m i g ht  bec ome as massive as $5 0 0~\rm{M}_{\odo t}$ (O mu k ai &  Pa lla  2003; Bro mm  & Lo e b 2004; Yo s h i dae t al. 2006; O ’Shea & Nor m an2007).  A fte r  their  main -s e que nce lifetim es o f typical ly $2- 3 ~\rm{My r }$, sta rs wit h m ass es b e lo w$\s im e q 1 0 0~ \rm { M}_ {\odot}$  a re  thou ghtt o c olla pse  dir ectly  to black hol eswith o utsigni fican t me ta l eje ction,  whil ein the range $\ sime q 140-260 ~\r m{ M}_ {\ odot} $  a pai r-i nst ability  supern o va(P I S N )disrupts the entir ep r og enitor,with e x pl os i on energ ie s r angi n g  from  $10 ^ {5 1}-10^{5 3}~\rm { er gs }$, and  y ieldsof  or der  $50\ % $ (H eger &  Woosley  2002 ;  Heger et al.2 003). Less ma s si v e  p r imor dia l stars wit h ah ighdegr e eofa ngula r mom en t um might explode withsi milarenerg ies, but as j et-like hy p e r novae (U meda &N omoto 2002; To minag a et al. 2 0 07). The  sign ificantmechanica l and chem ica l f eed bac k ef fects exerted b y su ch  explos ion s havebee n i nve sti ga ted witha number  o fde ta ile d cal c ulations ,but  t hes e wer e  eithe r per form ed  i n  on e dimen s io n (Sal va te rra200 4;  Kita yama & Y oshida2005; Mac hid a  etal .2005; W halen et al 2 00 8b), or di dnot  start f rom real istic initial condition s  (Bromm  et  al.2003 ; Normanetal. 20 04) .  Recen t work  trea te d t h e  full t hr ee- di mensionalp r obl em in  a  cos mologic al context at thec ost  of limited r eso luti o n ,fin d in g  th at the S N remnant propa gated foraH ub ble time a t  $z \s imeq 20 $ to afinal mass-we ighted me an shockra dius o f $ 2.5~\rm{kp c}$, rou ghly half the s i ze  of t heH [ii] {}  re gion(Greif etal. 2 007).Du e to t he hi gh  explosi on energy, the host hal o wasentir ely  evacuate d.A ddi tional si mula tions in t heabs enceofa  SN e xplo s io n w e re pe rfor m ed to inv e st iga t e  t he effect o f p hot oheat ing and th e im pact of the SN sh o ck on neighbor ingm i nih alo s . Fo rthe case discu sse di n  Greif e tal. (2007),  the SNre m nantexerte d posi tive me c h an i cal fe edba ckon neighb ori ng minihal os  b y  shock -com pr essing  their core s ,  while photo
, allowing_molecules to_become shielded from photodissociating_radiation and_altering_the cooling_properties_of the primordial_gas (see Johnson_et al. 2007).](f1.eps){width="12cm"}

Mechanical Feedback
-------------------

Numerical_simulations have indicated_that_Pop III.1 stars might become as massive as $500~\rm{M}_{\odot}$ (Omukai & Palla 2003; Bromm &_Loeb_2004; Yoshida_et_al._2006; O’Shea & Norman 2007)._After their main-sequence lifetimes of_typically $2-3~\rm{Myr}$,_stars with masses below $\simeq 100~\rm{M}_{\odot}$ are thought_to_collapse directly to_black holes without significant metal ejection, while in the_range $\simeq 140-260~\rm{M}_{\odot}$ a pair-instability supernova_(PISN) disrupts the_entire_progenitor,_with explosion energies ranging_from $10^{51}-10^{53}~\rm{ergs}$, and yields of order_$50\%$ (Heger & Woosley 2002; Heger_et al. 2003). Less massive primordial stars_with a high degree of angular_momentum might explode with similar_energies, but_as jet-like hypernovae (Umeda &_Nomoto 2002; Tominaga_et al._2007). The significant_mechanical and chemical feedback effects exerted_by such explosions_have been investigated with a number_of_detailed calculations, but_these_were_either performed_in one dimension_(Salvaterra_2004; Kitayama_&_Yoshida 2005; Machida et al. 2005;_Whalen_et al 2008b), or did not start_from realistic initial conditions_(Bromm_et al. 2003; Norman_et al. 2004). Recent work_treated the full three-dimensional problem in_a cosmological_context at_the cost of limited resolution, finding that the SN remnant propagated_for a Hubble time at $z\simeq_20$ to a final_mass-weighted mean_shock_radius of $2.5~\rm{kpc}$,_roughly_half the_size of the H [ii]{} region (Greif et_al. 2007)._Due to the high explosion energy,_the host halo was_entirely_evacuated. Additional simulations in the absence_of a SN explosion were performed_to investigate the effect of_photoheating_and_the impact of the SN_shock on neighboring minihalos. For the_case discussed in_Greif et al. (2007), the SN remnant_exerted_positive mechanical feedback on neighboring minihalos_by_shock-compressing their cores, while photo