$. One is $\beta_1=\beta_2=\beta_3=1$, and the corresponding mean vectors are generally selected as ${{\bm \mu}}_1=1, {{\bm \mu}}_2=1,  {{\bm \mu}}_3=-2$. The other one is $\beta_1=\beta_2=-\frac{1}{2}, \beta_3=1$, and the corresponding mean vectors are given as ${{\bm \mu}}_1=1, {{\bm \mu}}_2=3,  {{\bm \mu}}_3=2$ without loss of generality. The alternative hypotheses are designed that the ${{\bm \mu}}_3$ is the value under the null hypothesis added $\Delta{{\bm \mu}}$ described as above, while ${{\bm \mu}}_1$ and ${{\bm \mu}}_2$ remain unchanged.

For each set of the scenarios, we report both empirical Type I errors and powers with 10,000 replications at $\alpha=0.05$ significance level. Different pair values of $p, n_1, n_2, n_3$ are selected, and $\epsilon$ is varying from 0 to 0.9 or 1 to show the empirical sizes and powers. The mean parameter is supposed to be unknown and substituted by the sample mean during the calculations. Simulation results of empirical Type I errors and powers for the three group tests are listed in the Table \[tab:1\] and Table \[tab:2\]. Simulation results of empirical Type I errors and powers for the two-sample test are represented in Table \[tab:3\].

[14cm]{}[ccXXXX]{} [$(p, n_1, n_2, n_3)$ ]{} & & &\
&&Ours & TNT&Ours & TNT\
& & &\
Normal & $\epsilon=0$ (size) &0.0647 &0.0697 &0.0614 &0.0707\
& 0.2 &0.1056 &0.0772 &0.1059 &0.0721\
& 0.4 &0.2568 &0.0872 &0.3042 &0.0855\
& 0.6 &0.5795 &0.1235 &0.6888 &0.1181\
& 0.8 &0.8739 &0.2055 &0.9496 &0.2038\

$. One is $ \beta_1=\beta_2=\beta_3=1 $, and the corresponding mean vectors are generally selected as $ { { \bm \mu}}_1=1, { { \bm \mu}}_2=1,   { { \bm \mu}}_3=-2$. The early one is $ \beta_1=\beta_2=-\frac{1}{2 }, \beta_3=1 $, and the comparable mean vector are given as $ { { \bm \mu}}_1=1, { { \bm \mu}}_2=3,   { { \bm \mu}}_3=2 $ without personnel casualty of generalization. The alternative hypotheses are designed that the $ { { \bm \mu}}_3 $ is the value under the null guess add $ \Delta{{\bm \mu}}$ described as above, while $ { { \bm \mu}}_1 $ and $ { { \bm \mu}}_2 $ stay unchanged. 

 For each set of the scenario, we report both empirical Type I error and powers with 10,000 replications at $ \alpha=0.05 $ significance level. Different couple values of $ p, n_1, n_2, n_3 $ are selected, and $ \epsilon$ is deviate from 0 to 0.9 or 1 to show the empirical size and powers. The average parameter is supposed to be unknown and substituted by the sample think of during the calculations. Simulation results of empirical Type I errors and powers for the three group tests are listed in the Table \[tab:1\ ] and Table \[tab:2\ ]. Simulation results of empirical Type I errors and powers for the two - sample test are represent in Table \[tab:3\ ]. 

 [ 14cm]{}[ccXXXX ] { } [ $ (p, n_1, n_2, n_3)$ ] { } & & & \ 
 & & Ours & TNT&Ours & TNT\ 
 & & & \ 
 Normal & $ \epsilon=0 $ (size) & 0.0647 & 0.0697 & 0.0614 & 0.0707\ 
 & 0.2 & 0.1056 & 0.0772 & 0.1059 & 0.0721\ 
 & 0.4 & 0.2568 & 0.0872 & 0.3042 & 0.0855\ 
 & 0.6 & 0.5795 & 0.1235 & 0.6888 & 0.1181\ 
 & 0.8 & 0.8739 & 0.2055 & 0.9496 & 0.2038\
$. Onf is $\beta_1=\beta_2=\beta_3=1$, and tht corresponding mgab vectmrs ars generauly selected as ${{\bm \mu}}_1=1, {{\bm \mu}}_2=1,  {{\bn \mu}}_3=-2$. Uke other one is $\beta_1=\ceta_2=-\frac{1}{2}, \heta_3=1$, and the xorrespondmhg mean vectodd arz jiven as ${{\bm \mu}}_1=1, {{\nm \mu}}_2=3,  {{\bm \mg}}_3=2$ without loss ow yenerality. The alternative hypothesef are drslgned that the ${{\bm \kt}}_3$ is nht value under the null hypothesis added $\Velta{{\bm \mu}}$ desctibed as above, while ${{\bm \mu}}_1$ and ${{\bm \mu}}_2$ remain unchwnged.

For eaxh sqr of the scevarios, we gzport both gmpirical Type I errors and powefs wich 10,000 replicajnins dt $\alpha=0.05$ sijnificwnce level. Dlgferend pair falues of $p, n_1, k_2, n_3$ ace swlected, and $\epsilon$ iv varying from 0 to 0.9 or 1 to vhkw the empirical wizes atd pmwerr. Thd mtan pzrametfr ms supposed to be unkniwn and substituted br the sample msan duwigg the calculations. Simulation results mf smpirical Type I errors and powers for the tjree grou[ tests are listed in the Table \[tab:1\] and Table \[tab:2\]. Simumxtiin fwsklts of empirical Type I errors and powers fow tne two-sample tesb are represented on Tsfle \[tab:3\].

[14cm]{}[ccXXBX]{} [$(p, n_1, n_2, h_3)$ ]{} & & &\
&&Ours & TNT&Ours & TNT\
& & &\
Gormao & $\epsilog=0$ (siae) &0.0647 &0.0697 &0.0614 &0.0707\
& 0.2 &0.1056 &0.0772 &0.1059 &0.0721\
& 0.4 &0.2568 &0.0872 &0.3042 &0.0855\
& 0.6 &0.5795 &0.1235 &0.6888 &0.1181\
& 0.8 &0.8739 &0.2055 &0.9496 &0.2038\

$. One is $\beta_1=\beta_2=\beta_3=1$, and the corresponding are selected as \mu}}_1=1, {{\bm \mu}}_2=1, is \beta_3=1$, and the mean vectors are as ${{\bm \mu}}_1=1, {{\bm \mu}}_2=3, {{\bm without loss of generality. The alternative hypotheses are designed that the ${{\bm \mu}}_3$ the value under the null hypothesis added $\Delta{{\bm \mu}}$ described as above, while \mu}}_1$ ${{\bm remain For each set of the scenarios, we report both empirical Type I errors and powers with replications at $\alpha=0.05$ significance level. Different pair values $p, n_1, n_2, n_3$ selected, and $\epsilon$ is varying 0 0.9 or to the sizes and powers. mean parameter is supposed to be unknown and substituted by the sample mean during the calculations. Simulation of empirical errors and for three tests are listed Table \[tab:1\] and Table \[tab:2\]. Simulation Type I errors and powers for the two-sample are represented Table \[tab:3\]. [14cm]{}[ccXXXX]{} [$(p, n_1, n_2, ]{} & & &\ &&Ours & TNT&Ours & & & &\ Normal & $\epsilon=0$ (size) &0.0647 &0.0697 &0.0614 &0.0707\ & 0.2 &0.1056 &0.0772 & 0.4 &0.2568 &0.0872 &0.0855\ & 0.6 &0.1235 &0.1181\ 0.8 &0.2055 &0.9496
$. One is $\beta_1=\beta_2=\beta_3=1$, and the coRrespondinG mean VecTorS aRe geNeraLly selected as ${{\bM \Mu}}_1=1, {{\bm \Mu}}_2=1,  {{\bm \mu}}_3=-2$. The other one is $\betA_1=\beta_2=-\FrAC{1}{2}, \betA_3=1$, AnD the cOrrespoNDiNG MeaN vEcTorS aRE gIven aS ${{\bm \Mu}}_1=1, {{\bm \mu}}_2=3,  {{\bM \mu}}_3=2$ without LosS oF generality. THE aLternative HypOtheses are deSigNed thaT tHe ${{\bM \Mu}}_3$ is tHe vAlue uNder thE Null hyPothesis aDdED $\Delta{{\BM \mu}}$ descRIBeD as aBove, while ${{\bm \mu}}_1$ and ${{\bM \Mu}}_2$ REmain unchanged.

for eacH sET oF THe sCenArios, we repOrT both EMpiricaL tyPE i ErrORs and powers wiTh 10,000 replicatiONs aT $\alpha=0.05$ SiGniFIcance Level. diFFerEnt pair valuEs of $P, n_1, n_2, n_3$ are seLected, ANd $\epsilON$ is varyIng froM 0 to 0.9 Or 1 tO shoW ThE eMpiRiCAl sIZeS anD PowErs. The meAn PaRametEr is SUPPOsed To bE unkNown aNd substituted By tHe saMPle Mean dUring The cAlCulatIons. SiMulatIoN results of empirIcal type I erroRs aNd PowErS for tHE three GroUp tEsts are Listed iN The taBLE \[TaB:1\] and Table \[tab:2\]. SimulaTiON ReSults of eMpiricAL TYpE i errors aNd PowErs fOR The twO-samPLe Test are rEpreseNTeD iN Table \[tAb:3\].

[14Cm]{}[ccXXxX]{} [$(P, n_1, n_2, N_3)$ ]{} & & &\
&&OuRs & TNT&oUrs & TnT\
& & &\
NormAl & $\epsiloN=0$ (size) &0.0647 &0.0697 &0.0614 &0.0707\
& 0.2 &0.1056 &0.0772 &0.1059 &0.0721\
& 0.4 &0.2568 &0.0872 &0.3042 &0.0855\
& 0.6 &0.5795 &0.1235 &0.6888 &0.1181\
& 0.8 &0.8739 &0.2055 &0.9496 &0.2038\

$. One is $\beta_1=\beta_2 =\beta_3=1 $, an d t heco rres pond ing mean vecto r s ar e generally selected a s ${{ \b m  \mu } }_ 1=1,{{\bm \ m u} } _ 2=1 , { {\b m\ mu }}_3= -2$ . The o ther one i s $ \b eta_1=\beta_ 2 =- \frac{1}{2 },\beta_3=1$,and  the c or res p ondin g m ean v ectors are gi ven as ${ {\ b m \mu} } _1=1, { { \ bm  \mu }}_2=3,  {{\bm \m u }} _ 3=2$ without l oss of  g e ne r a lit y.The altern at ive h y pothese s  a r e des i gned that the  ${{\bm \mu } }_3 $ is t he  va l ue und er th en ull  hypothesis  add ed $\Delt a{{\bm \mu}}$d escribe d as a bov e,whil e  $ {{ \bm  \ m u}} _ 1$  an d  ${ {\bm \mu }} _2 $ rem ainu n c h ange d.
For  each  set of the s cen ario s , w e rep ort b othem piric al Typ e I e rr ors and powerswith  10,000 r epl ic ati on s at$ \alpha =0. 05$  signif icancel eve l. D i ff erent pair valuesof $ p,  n_1, n_ 2, n_3 $  a re selected ,and  $\e p s ilon$  isv ar ying fro m 0 to 0. 9or 1 to  s how th eemp iri cal s i zesand po wers. Th e mea n  parameter iss upposed to be un k n ow n  and  su bstituted b y th e  sam plem ea n d u ringthe c al c ul a tions. Simulation r es ults o f emp irical Type I  errors an d p owers fo r th e  t h ree group test s are  listed in the Tabl e \[t ab:1\] a nd Table\ [ tab:2\].  Si mul ati onr e su lts of empiri c a l Ty pe  I erro rsand pow ers  fo r t hetw o-sampletest are  r ep re se nte d inT able \[t ab :3\ ]. 

[ 14cm] { }[ccXX XX]{}  [$( p,  n _ 1,n_2, n_ 3 )$ ] {} &  &  & \
&& Our s& TNT &Our s  &TNT\
&& &\
Norm al&  $\e ps il on=0$ ( size) &0.0647  & 0.0697 &0. 06 14&0.070 7 \ 
& 0.2 & 0.1056 &0.0772 &0.1059& 0.0721\ 
&0.4 & 0.25 68 &0.087 2 & 0.3042  &0 . 0855\& 0.6&0.57 95  &0 . 1 235 & 0 . 68 88&0 .1181\
& 0 . 8  &0 .8739  & 0.20 55 &0.9 496 &0.2038\

$. One_is $\beta_1=\beta_2=\beta_3=1$,_and the corresponding mean_vectors are_generally_selected as_${{\bm_\mu}}_1=1, {{\bm \mu}}_2=1,_ {{\bm \mu}}_3=-2$._The other one is_$\beta_1=\beta_2=-\frac{1}{2}, \beta_3=1$, and_the_corresponding mean vectors are given as ${{\bm \mu}}_1=1, {{\bm \mu}}_2=3,  {{\bm \mu}}_3=2$ without_loss_of generality._The_alternative_hypotheses are designed that the_${{\bm \mu}}_3$ is the value_under the_null hypothesis added $\Delta{{\bm \mu}}$ described as above,_while_${{\bm \mu}}_1$ and_${{\bm \mu}}_2$ remain unchanged.

For each set of the scenarios,_we report both empirical Type I_errors and powers_with_10,000_replications at $\alpha=0.05$ significance_level. Different pair values of $p,_n_1, n_2, n_3$ are selected, and_$\epsilon$ is varying from 0 to 0.9_or 1 to show the empirical_sizes and powers. The mean_parameter is_supposed to be unknown and_substituted by the_sample mean_during the calculations._Simulation results of empirical Type I_errors and powers_for the three group tests are_listed_in the Table_\[tab:1\]_and_Table \[tab:2\]._Simulation results of_empirical_Type I_errors_and powers for the two-sample test_are_represented in Table \[tab:3\].

[14cm]{}[ccXXXX]{} [$(p, n_1, n_2,_n_3)$ ]{} & &_&\
&&Ours_& TNT&Ours & TNT\
&_& &\
Normal & $\epsilon=0$ (size)_&0.0647 &0.0697 &0.0614 &0.0707\
& 0.2 &0.1056_&0.0772 &0.1059_&0.0721\
& 0.4_&0.2568 &0.0872 &0.3042 &0.0855\
& 0.6 &0.5795 &0.1235 &0.6888 &0.1181\
& 0.8 &0.8739_&0.2055 &0.9496 &0.2038\
