 to the nuclear spin environment via the contact hyperfine interaction, although they can still undergo decay due to spin-orbit coupling. The decay may still occur on an even longer time scale than for electrons,[@bulaev:2005b] which suggests the dot-confined hole spin may be another good candidate for quantum computing. Alternatively, quantum dots fabricated in isotopically purified $^{28}\mathrm{Si}$[@friesen:2003a] or $^{12}\mathrm{C}$ nanotubes[@mason:2004a; @sapmaz:2006a; @graeber:2006a] would be free of nuclei with spin, and therefore free of hyperfine-induced decoherence.

While the field of quantum-dot spin decoherence has been very active in the last few years, there still remain significant misconceptions regarding the nature of the most relevant (hyperfine) coupling, particularly, the range of validity of semiclassical spin models and traditional decoherence methods involving ensemble averaging have been called into question for a single isolated quantum dot with a potentially controllable environment. We address these issues in section \[sec:hyperfine\].

Hyperfine interaction: quantum and classical dynamics {#sec:hyperfine}
=====================================================

Exponential decay of the longitudinal and transverse components of spin is typically measured by the decay time scales $T_1$ and $T_2$, respectively.[@slichter:1980a] The longitudinal spin relaxation rate $1/T_1$ due to spin-orbit interaction and phonon emission is significantly reduced in quantum dots relative to the bulk in the presence of a weak Zeeman splitting $B=|\mathbf{B}|$ and large orbital level spacing $\hbar\omega_0$ ($1/T_1\propto B^5/(\hbar\omega_0)^4$).[@khaetskii:2001a; @golovach:2004a] This decay time has been shown to be on the order of $T_1\sim1\,\mathrm{ms}$ in gated GaAs quantum dots at $B\approx8\,\mathrm{T}$,[@elzerman:2004a] and to reach a value as large as $T_1=170\,\mathrm{ms}$ at low magnetic fields ($B=1.75\,\mathrm{T}$).[@amasha:2006a] Furthermore, since dephasing is absent at leading order for fluctuations that couple through the spin-orbit interaction, the $T_2$
to the nuclear spin environment via the contact hyperfine interaction, although they can still undergo decay due to spin - orbit yoke. The decay may however occur on an even longer meter plate than for electrons,[@bulaev:2005b ] which suggests the dot - confined fix spin may be another good campaigner for quantum computer science. Alternatively, quantum dots fabricate in isotopically purified $ ^{28}\mathrm{Si}$[@friesen:2003a ] or $ ^{12}\mathrm{C}$ nanotubes[@mason:2004a; @sapmaz:2006a; @graeber:2006a ] would be free of lens nucleus with tailspin, and therefore free of hyperfine - induce decoherence. 

 While the field of quantum - dot tailspin decoherence has been very active in the last few years, there still stay significant misconceptions see the nature of the most relevant (hyperfine) yoke, particularly, the stove of validity of semiclassical spin models and traditional decoherence method involving ensemble averaging have been called into question for a single isolated quantum dot with a potentially controllable environment. We address these issues in section \[sec: hyperfine\ ]. 

 Hyperfine interaction: quantum and classical dynamics { # sec: hyperfine } 
 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 

 Exponential decay of the longitudinal and transverse components of spin is typically measured by the decay time scales $ T_1 $ and $ T_2 $, respectively.[@slichter:1980a ] The longitudinal tailspin easiness rate $ 1 / T_1 $ due to tailspin - eye socket interaction and phonon discharge is significantly reduced in quantum dot relative to the bulk in the presence of a weak Zeeman burst $ B=|\mathbf{B}|$ and large orbital level spacing $ \hbar\omega_0 $ ($ 1 / T_1\propto B^5/(\hbar\omega_0)^4$).[@khaetskii:2001a; @golovach:2004a ] This decay time has been testify to be on the order of $ T_1\sim1\,\mathrm{ms}$ in gated GaAs quantum dots at $ B\approx8\,\mathrm{T}$,[@elzerman:2004a ] and to reach a value as large as $ T_1=170\,\mathrm{ms}$ at gloomy magnetic fields ($ B=1.75\,\mathrm{T}$).[@amasha:2006a ] Furthermore, since dephasing is absent at leading order for fluctuation that couple through the spin - orbit interaction, the $ T_2 $
 to the nuclear spin envirokment via the couract hbperfins interaztion, although they can stilp ynderto decay due to spin-orcit couplpng. The dwcay nay still occur on an evsk lonyec time scale thsn for elewtrons,[@bulaev:2005b] fhkck suggests the dot-confined hole spin may be ajother good cagdidsee fkg wuantum computing. Alternativemy, quanuum dots fabricatec in isotopically purified $^{28}\matjrm{Si}$[@friesen:2003a] or $^{12}\mwthrm{C}$ nanojhbef[@nason:2004a; @sapmax:2006a; @graeber:2006a] would be ftee of nuclei with spin, and therdfore free of hi'wrflte-induced dxcohervnce.

While the field ox quantim-dot spin decphecencw has been very activx in the last few yewrs, there scill remain significabt miscmnce[tiovw rdgaddmng the nwtuce of the mkst relevanr (hyperfine) couplinb, [qrticularly, tge rande of validity of semiclassical spin modens znd traditional decoherwnce methods involvinh ensemblq averaging have been called into question for a vinglx ksooabed dyajtum dot with a potentially controllable enviwknkekt. We address thcse issues in sectooj \[xgc:hyperfine\].

Hypgrfine nhtsraction: quantum ajd clasfical dynamics {#sec:nyperfine}
=====================================================

Exponential decay if the longinudibal and transverse components of xpin os typically measured bv the secay time dcales $T_1$ zvd $T_2$, respectivelh.[@slpchtar:1980a] The longitudinal spin welaxatioi ratz $1/T_1$ due go skin-orbie interactlon akg phonon emission ls siynifiwantly redkced in quantum dots relative to the bulk in jhe prvsence of a wesk Zeeman splytting $B=|\mathbf{Y}|$ and laxge orcital levem spaciig $\hbar\omega_0$ ($1/T_1\propto B^5/(\hbas\lmega_0)^4$).[@khaetskmi:2001a; @golovwch:2004a] Thiw decay gime has been xhown to yt on the oeder of $T_1\sim1\,\mathrm{ks}$ kh gated GaAs qucuton dots at $B\apptox8\,\oatrrl{T}$,[@xlzeridn:2004a] and to raach a xslue xs largt aw $T_1=170\,\mayhrm{ms}$ at low magnethc fjelds ($B=1.75\,\mathrm{T}$).[@amasna:2006w] Furthetmore, sinse dephasing os absent at leadijg orver foc flucyuajions that couple through the slin-orbit lntcraction, the $E_2$
to the nuclear spin environment via the interaction, they can undergo decay due may occur on an longer time scale for electrons,[@bulaev:2005b] which suggests the dot-confined spin may be another good candidate for quantum computing. Alternatively, quantum dots fabricated isotopically purified $^{28}\mathrm{Si}$[@friesen:2003a] or $^{12}\mathrm{C}$ nanotubes[@mason:2004a; @sapmaz:2006a; @graeber:2006a] would be free of nuclei spin, therefore of decoherence. While the field of quantum-dot spin decoherence has been very active in the last few there still remain significant misconceptions regarding the nature the most relevant (hyperfine) particularly, the range of validity semiclassical models and decoherence involving averaging have been into question for a single isolated quantum dot with a potentially controllable environment. We address these issues section \[sec:hyperfine\]. quantum and dynamics ===================================================== decay of the transverse components of spin is typically decay time scales $T_1$ and $T_2$, respectively.[@slichter:1980a] The spin relaxation $1/T_1$ due to spin-orbit interaction and emission is significantly reduced in quantum dots relative the bulk in the presence of a weak Zeeman splitting $B=|\mathbf{B}|$ and large orbital level ($1/T_1\propto B^5/(\hbar\omega_0)^4$).[@khaetskii:2001a; @golovach:2004a] This time has been to on order $T_1\sim1\,\mathrm{ms}$ in GaAs quantum dots at $B\approx8\,\mathrm{T}$,[@elzerman:2004a] and to reach a value as as $T_1=170\,\mathrm{ms}$ at low magnetic fields ($B=1.75\,\mathrm{T}$).[@amasha:2006a] Furthermore, since dephasing at order for fluctuations couple through the spin-orbit the
 to the nuclear spin environmeNt via the coNtact HypErfInE intEracTion, although thEY can Still undergo decay due to Spin-oRbIT couPLiNg. The Decay maY StILL ocCuR oN an EvEN lOnger TimE scale tHan for elecTroNs,[@Bulaev:2005b] which SUgGests the doT-coNfined hole spIn mAy be anOtHer GOod caNdiDate fOr quanTUm compUting. AlteRnATively, QUantum dOTS fAbriCated in isotopicalLY pURified $^{28}\mathrm{Si}$[@FrieseN:2003a] OR $^{12}\mATHrm{c}$ naNotubes[@masOn:2004A; @sapmAZ:2006a; @graebER:2006a] WOULd bE Free of nuclei wIth spin, and tHEreFore frEe Of hYPerfinE-induCeD DecOherence.

WhiLe thE field of qUantum-DOt spin dECoherenCe has bEen VerY actIVe In The LaST feW YeArs, THerE still reMaIn SigniFicaNT MISconCepTionS regaRding the naturE of The mOSt rElevaNt (hypErfiNe) CouplIng, parTiculArLy, the range of valIditY of semiclAssIcAl sPiN modeLS and trAdiTioNal decoHerence MEthOdS INVoLving ensemble averaGiNG HaVe been caLled inTO qUeSTion for a SiNglE isoLATed quAntuM DoT with a poTentiaLLy CoNtrollaBlE envirOnMenT. We AddreSS theSe issuEs in sectIon \[seC:Hyperfine\].

HyperFIne interactioN: QuANTuM And cLasSical dynamiCs {#seC:HypeRfinE}
=====================================================

exPonENtial Decay Of THe LOngitudinal and transVeRse comPonenTs of spin is typIcally measURED by the deCay tIMe SCales $T_1$ and $T_2$, respEctivEly.[@slichteR:1980A] The longItudiNal spin rElaxation RATe $1/T_1$ due to SpiN-orBit IntERAcTion and phonon EMIssiOn Is signiFicAntly reDucEd iN quAntUm Dots relatIve to the BuLk In ThE prEsencE Of a weak ZEeMan SpLitTing $B=|\MAthbf{B}|$ And laRge oRbItAL leVel spacINg $\HBAr\omEgA_0$ ($1/T_1\PropTo B^5/(\HbAr\omeGa_0)^4$).[@khAEtsKii:2001a; @golOvach:2004a] ThiS deCAy tiMe HaS been shOwn to be on the oRdEr of $T_1\sim1\,\maThRm{mS}$ in gatED gaAs quanTum dots at $B\approx8\,\mathrm{T}$,[@ELzerman:2004A] anD to reAch a Value as laRge As $T_1=170\,\matHrm{MS}$ at low MagnetIc fieLdS ($B=1.75\,\mATHrm{T}$).[@aMAShA:2006a] FUrThermore, siNCE dePhasiNg Is abSent at lEading order for flucTUatIons that couplE thRougH THe SpiN-OrBIt iNtERacTIOn, the $T_2$
 to the nuclear spin envir onment via  thecon tac thype rfin e interaction, alth ough they can still un dergo  d e cayd ue  to s pin-orb i tc o upl in g.  Th ed ec ay ma y s till oc cur on aneve nlonger times ca le than fo r e lectrons,[@b ula ev:200 5b ] w h ich s ugg eststhe do t -confi ned holesp i n mayb e anoth e r  g oodcandidate for qua n tu m  computing. Al ternat iv e ly , qua ntu m dots fab ri cated in isot o pi c a l lyp urified $^{28 }\mathrm{Si } $[@ friese n: 200 3 a] or$^{12 }\ m ath rm{C}$ nano tube s[@mason: 2004a; @sapmaz : 2006a;@graeb er: 200 6a]w ou ld  be  f r eeo fnuc l eiwith spi n,  a nd th eref o r e free  of  hyp erfin e-induced dec ohe renc e .
While  thefiel dof qu antum- dot s pi n decoherence h as b een veryact iv e i nthe l a st few  ye ars , there  stillr ema in s i gn ificant misconcept io n s  r egarding  the n a tu re of the m os t r elev a n t (hy perf i ne ) coupli ng, pa r ti cu larly,th e rang eofval idity of s emicla ssical s pin m o dels and tradi t ional decoher e nc e me t hods  in volving ens embl e  ave ragi n ghav e  been  call ed in t o question for a si ng le iso lated  quantum dotwith a pot e n t ially co ntro l la b le environment . Weaddress th e se issue s insection\[sec:hyp e r fine\].
Hy per fin e i n t er action: quant u m  and  c lassica l d ynamics  {# sec :hy per fi ne}
===== ======== == == == == === ===== = ======== == === == === ===== 
Expon entia l de ca yo f t he long i tu d i nalan dtran sve rs e com pone n tsof spin  is typic all y  mea su re d by th e decay timesc ales $T_1$  a nd$T_2$, r espectiv ely.[@slichter:1980a] T h e longi tud inalspin  relaxati onrate $ 1/T _ 1$ due  to sp in-or bi t i n t eract i o nand  p honon emis s i onis si gn ific antly r educed in quantumd ots  relative tothe  bul k in  th e  p r ese nc e  of a  weak Zeeman sp litting $B =| \ ma thbf{B}|$a ndla rge orb ital le vel s p acing $ \hbar\ome ga_0$ ($1 /T _1\p r o pto  B^5/(\hba r\omega_ 0)^4$).[@ k haets k ii :2001 a;@golov ac h:2 004a]  Thisd eca y tim e hasbe en sho wn to  b e on the  order of $T_1\sim1\,\m athrm{ ms}$ingated GaA s q u ant um dots a t $B \approx8\, \ma thr m{T}$ ,[@ e lzerm an:2 0 04 a]a nd to  rea c h a value as  la r g eas $T_1=170 \ , \ mat hrm{m s}$ at low  mag netic fields ($B= 1 .75\,\mathrm{T }$). [ @ ama sha : 2006 a]  Furthermore,sin ce d ephasing  i s absent at  leading  o r der f or flu ctuati ons tha t co u ple th roug h t he spin-o rbi ti nteract io n, the $T _2$
 to_the nuclear_spin environment via the_contact hyperfine_interaction,_although they_can_still undergo decay_due to spin-orbit_coupling. The decay may_still occur on_an_even longer time scale than for electrons,[@bulaev:2005b] which suggests the dot-confined hole spin may_be_another good_candidate_for_quantum computing. Alternatively, quantum dots_fabricated in isotopically purified $^{28}\mathrm{Si}$[@friesen:2003a]_or $^{12}\mathrm{C}$_nanotubes[@mason:2004a; @sapmaz:2006a; @graeber:2006a] would be free of nuclei_with_spin, and therefore_free of hyperfine-induced decoherence.

While the field of quantum-dot spin_decoherence has been very active in_the last few_years,_there_still remain significant misconceptions_regarding the nature of the most_relevant (hyperfine) coupling, particularly, the range_of validity of semiclassical spin models and_traditional decoherence methods involving ensemble averaging_have been called into question_for a_single isolated quantum dot with_a potentially controllable_environment. We_address these issues_in section \[sec:hyperfine\].

Hyperfine interaction: quantum and_classical dynamics {#sec:hyperfine}
=====================================================

Exponential_decay of the longitudinal and transverse_components_of spin is_typically_measured_by the_decay time scales_$T_1$_and $T_2$,_respectively.[@slichter:1980a]_The longitudinal spin relaxation rate $1/T_1$_due_to spin-orbit interaction and phonon emission is_significantly reduced in quantum_dots_relative to the bulk_in the presence of a_weak Zeeman splitting $B=|\mathbf{B}|$ and large_orbital level_spacing $\hbar\omega_0$_($1/T_1\propto B^5/(\hbar\omega_0)^4$).[@khaetskii:2001a; @golovach:2004a] This decay time has been shown to be_on the order of $T_1\sim1\,\mathrm{ms}$ in_gated GaAs quantum dots_at $B\approx8\,\mathrm{T}$,[@elzerman:2004a]_and_to reach a_value_as large_as $T_1=170\,\mathrm{ms}$ at low magnetic fields ($B=1.75\,\mathrm{T}$).[@amasha:2006a]_Furthermore, since_dephasing is absent at leading order_for fluctuations that couple_through_the spin-orbit interaction, the $T_2$