
By construction variety $V$ is a point, a curve or a surface. Moreover, when $V$ is a point by Proposition 7.2 in [@Prokhorov-degree] we have $\dim |-K_{W}| \leqslant 34$ which contradicts the estimate from Remark \[remark:inequalities\].

In what follows we will treat separately the cases when $V$ is a curve and a surface.

Proof of Theorem \[theorem:main\] in the case when $V$ is a curve {#section:curve}
=================================================================

We use the notation and assumptions from Section \[section:reduction\]. From the Leray spectral sequence and Kawamata–Vieweg Vanishing Theorem we deduce that $H^{1}(V,
\mathcal{O}_{V})=H^{1}(W, \mathcal{O}_{W})=0$. Thus, we have $V
\simeq \mathbb{P}^{1}$ in the present case.

General fibre $W_{\eta}$ of the contraction $g: W \longrightarrow V$ is a non-singular del Pezzo surface. For $H \in \mathcal{H}_{W}$ divisor $-(K_{W_{\eta}}+H|_{W_{\eta}})$ is ample by construction and divisor $H|_{W_{\eta}}$ is ample by Remark \[remark:linear-systems\]. This implies that $W_{\eta} \simeq \mathbb{P}^{2}$ or $\mathbb{P}^{1}\times\mathbb{P}^{1}$. Moreover, for $W_{\eta} \simeq \mathbb{P}^{2}$ we have either $H|_{W_{\eta}} \simeq \mathcal{O}_{\mathbb{P}^{2}}(1)$ or $\mathcal{O}_{\mathbb{P}^{2}}(2)$.

\[theorem:special-scrolls\] In the above notation, if $W_{\eta} \simeq \mathbb{P}^{2}$ and $H|_{W_{\eta}} \simeq \mathcal{O}_{\mathbb{P}^{2}}(1)$, then $W$ is a $\mathbb{P}^{2}$-bundle. Moreover, either $W = \mathrm{Proj}\left(\mathcal{O}_{\mathbb{P}^{1}}(5)\oplus\mathcal{O}_{\mathbb{P}^{1}}(2)\oplus\mathcal{O}_{\mathbb{P}^{1}}\right)$ or $\mathrm{Proj}\left(\mathcal{O}_{\
By construction variety $ V$ is a point, a curve or a open. furthermore, when $ V$ is a point by Proposition 7.2 in [ @Prokhorov - degree ] we get $ \dim |-K_{W}| \leqslant 34 $ which contradict the estimate from Remark   \[remark: inequalities\ ]. 

 In what follows we will process separately the cases when $ V$ is a curvature and a surface. 

 Proof of Theorem   \[theorem: main\ ] in the case when $ V$ is a bend { # section: curve } 
 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 

 We practice the notation and assumptions from Section   \[section: reduction\ ]. From the Leray spectral sequence and Kawamata – Vieweg Vanishing Theorem we deduce that $ H^{1}(V, 
 \mathcal{O}_{V})=H^{1}(W, \mathcal{O}_{W})=0$. Thus, we suffer $ V 
 \simeq \mathbb{P}^{1}$ in the present case. 

 General fibre $ W_{\eta}$ of the compression $ g: W \longrightarrow V$ is a non - singular del Pezzo open. For $ H \in \mathcal{H}_{W}$ divisor $ -(K_{W_{\eta}}+H|_{W_{\eta}})$ is ample by construction and divisor $ H|_{W_{\eta}}$ is ample by Remark   \[remark: linear - systems\ ]. This imply that $ W_{\eta } \simeq \mathbb{P}^{2}$ or $ \mathbb{P}^{1}\times\mathbb{P}^{1}$. Moreover, for $ W_{\eta } \simeq \mathbb{P}^{2}$ we have either $ H|_{W_{\eta } } \simeq \mathcal{O}_{\mathbb{P}^{2}}(1)$ or $ \mathcal{O}_{\mathbb{P}^{2}}(2)$. 

 \[theorem: special - scrolls\ ] In the above notation, if $ W_{\eta } \simeq \mathbb{P}^{2}$ and $ H|_{W_{\eta } } \simeq \mathcal{O}_{\mathbb{P}^{2}}(1)$, then $ W$ is a $ \mathbb{P}^{2}$-bundle. Moreover, either $ W = \mathrm{Proj}\left(\mathcal{O}_{\mathbb{P}^{1}}(5)\oplus\mathcal{O}_{\mathbb{P}^{1}}(2)\oplus\mathcal{O}_{\mathbb{P}^{1}}\right)$ or $ \mathrm{Proj}\left(\mathcal{O}_{\

By fonstruction variety $V$ ir a point, a currw or a surfade. Moreoxer, when $V$ is a point by Pro'osirion 7.2 in [@Prokhorov-degree] we have $\dim |-K_{W}| \leqsoant 34$ which convdadicts the eabimatz hrom Remark \[rematk:inequalitias\].

In what follmwr ce will treat separately the cases wren $V$ ix w curve and a furfsse.

Prkof of Theorem \[theorem:main\] in the czse whei $V$ is a curve {#xection:curve}
=================================================================

We use the notwtioj and assumptions vrom Sectiob \[seceuon:reduction\]. From the Leray spectrzl sequence and Kawamata–Vieweg Xanisking Theoren qe fgduce that $H^{1}(T,
\mathcwl{O}_{V})=H^{1}(W, \mathcal{O}_{W})=0$. Thuv, we hafe $V
\simeq \mathnb{P}^{1}$ ii thw present case.

General fibre $W_{\eta}$ of the contracthou $g: W \longrightarrow C$ us a ton-shnguuqr ael Pxzzk surfwce. For $H \in \jathcal{H}_{W}$ duvisor $-(K_{W_{\eta}}+H|_{W_{\eta}})$ ix wnple by constductiog wnd divisor $H|_{W_{\eta}}$ is ample by Remark \[remdrk:minear-systems\]. This implues that $W_{\eta} \simeq \mwthbb{P}^{2}$ or $\mathbb{P}^{1}\times\mathbb{P}^{1}$. Moreover, for $W_{\eta} \simeq \mathtb{P}^{2}$ wx favt clthef $H|_{A_{\eta}} \simeq \mathcal{O}_{\mathbb{P}^{2}}(1)$ or $\mathcal{O}_{\mathbb{P}^{2}}(2)$.

\[egeprvm:special-scrolls\] Ln the above notatooj, os $W_{\eta} \simeq \oathbb{'}^{2}$ ahd $H|_{W_{\eta}} \simeq \matjcal{O}_{\majhbb{P}^{2}}(1)$, rhen $W$ is a $\msthbb{P}^{2}$-bundle. Moreover, eithee $W = \mathrm{Pgoj}\lwft(\mathcal{O}_{\mathbb{P}^{1}}(5)\lplus\mathcau{O}_{\majhbb{P}^{1}}(2)\ollus\mathcal{O}_{\mathbb{P}^{1}}\righc)$ or $\mzthrm{Proj}\levt(\mathcal{K}_{\
By construction variety $V$ is a point, or surface. Moreover, $V$ is a [@Prokhorov-degree] have $\dim |-K_{W}| 34$ which contradicts estimate from Remark \[remark:inequalities\]. In what we will treat separately the cases when $V$ is a curve and a Proof of Theorem \[theorem:main\] in the case when $V$ is a curve {#section:curve} We the and from Section \[section:reduction\]. From the Leray spectral sequence and Kawamata–Vieweg Vanishing Theorem we deduce that $H^{1}(V, \mathcal{O}_{W})=0$. Thus, we have $V \simeq \mathbb{P}^{1}$ in present case. General fibre of the contraction $g: W V$ a non-singular Pezzo For \in \mathcal{H}_{W}$ divisor is ample by construction and divisor $H|_{W_{\eta}}$ is ample by Remark \[remark:linear-systems\]. This implies that $W_{\eta} \simeq or $\mathbb{P}^{1}\times\mathbb{P}^{1}$. $W_{\eta} \simeq we either \simeq \mathcal{O}_{\mathbb{P}^{2}}(1)$ or In the above notation, if $W_{\eta} $H|_{W_{\eta}} \simeq \mathcal{O}_{\mathbb{P}^{2}}(1)$, then $W$ is a $\mathbb{P}^{2}$-bundle. either $W \mathrm{Proj}\left(\mathcal{O}_{\mathbb{P}^{1}}(5)\oplus\mathcal{O}_{\mathbb{P}^{1}}(2)\oplus\mathcal{O}_{\mathbb{P}^{1}}\right)$ or $\mathrm{Proj}\left(\mathcal{O}_{\

By construction variety $V$ is a Point, a curvE or a sUrfAce. moReovEr, whEn $V$ is a point by PROposItion 7.2 in [@Prokhorov-degree] We havE $\dIM |-K_{W}| \lEQsLant 34$ wHich conTRaDICts ThE eStiMaTE fRom ReMarK \[remark:InequalitiEs\].

IN wHat follows we WIlL treat sepaRatEly the cases wHen $v$ is a cuRvE anD A surfAce.

proof Of TheoREm \[theoRem:main\] in ThE Case whEN $V$ is a cuRVE {#sEctiOn:curve}
=================================================================

We use the noTAtIOn and assumptioNs from seCTiON \[SecTioN:reduction\]. frOm the lEray speCTrAL SEquENce and KawamatA–Vieweg VaniSHinG TheorEm We dEDuce thAt $H^{1}(V,
\mAtHCal{o}_{V})=H^{1}(W, \mathcal{o}_{W})=0$. ThUs, we have $V
\Simeq \mAThbb{P}^{1}$ in THe preseNt case.

genEraL fibRE $W_{\EtA}$ of ThE ConTRaCtiON $g: W \LongrighTaRrOw V$ is A non-SINGUlar Del pezzO surfAce. For $H \in \mathCal{h}_{W}$ diVIsoR $-(K_{W_{\etA}}+H|_{W_{\etA}})$ is aMpLe by cOnstruCtion AnD divisor $H|_{W_{\eta}}$ is AmplE by Remark \[RemArK:liNeAr-sysTEms\]. ThiS imPliEs that $W_{\Eta} \simeQ \MatHbB{p}^{2}$ OR $\mAthbb{P}^{1}\times\mathbb{P}^{1}$. moREOvEr, for $W_{\etA} \simeq \MAtHbB{p}^{2}$ we have eItHer $h|_{W_{\etA}} \SImeq \mAthcAL{O}_{\Mathbb{P}^{2}}(1)$ oR $\mathcAL{O}_{\MaThbb{P}^{2}}(2)$.

\[thEoRem:speCiAl-sCroLls\] In THe abOve notAtion, if $W_{\Eta} \siMEq \mathbb{P}^{2}$ and $H|_{W_{\ETa}} \simeq \mathcaL{o}_{\mATHbB{p}^{2}}(1)$, theN $W$ iS a $\mathbb{P}^{2}$-buNdle. mOreoVer, eIThEr $W = \MAthrm{proj}\lEfT(\MaTHcal{O}_{\mathbb{P}^{1}}(5)\oplus\maThCal{O}_{\maThbb{P}^{1}}(2)\Oplus\mathcal{O}_{\Mathbb{P}^{1}}\rigHT)$ OR $\mathrm{PRoj}\lEFt(\MAthcal{O}_{\

By construction variety $ V$ is a po int,a c urv eor a  sur face. Moreover ,  whe n $V$ is a point by Pr oposi ti o n 7. 2  i n [@P rokhoro v -d e g ree ]we  ha ve $\ dim | -K_ {W}| \l eqslant 34 $ w hi ch contradic t sthe estima tefrom Remark\[r emark: in equ a litie s\] .

In  whatf ollows  we willtr e at sep a ratelyt h ecase s when $V$ is a c u rv e  and a surface .

Pro of of T heo rem  \[theorem :m ain\] in thec as e w hen $V$ is a curv e {#section : cur ve}
== == === = ====== ===== == = === =========== ==== ========= ====== = ======= = =

We u se the  no tat iona nd  a ssu mp t ion s  f rom Sec tion \[s ec ti on:re duct i o n \ ]. F rom  the  Lera y spectral se que ncea ndKawam ata–V iewe gVanis hing T heore mwe deduce that$H^{ 1}(V,
\ma thc al {O} _{ V})=H ^ {1}(W,  \m ath cal{O}_ {W})=0$ .  Th us , w ehave $V
\simeq \ma th b b {P }^{1}$ i n thep re se n t case.
G ene ralf i bre $ W_{\ e ta }$ of th e cont r ac ti on $g:W\longr ig hta rro w V$i s anon-si ngular d el Pe z zo surface. Fo r  $H \in \math c al { H }_ { W}$div isor $-(K_{ W_{\ e ta}} +H|_ { W_ {\e t a}})$  is a mp l eb y construction anddi visor$H|_{ W_{\eta}}$ is  ample byR e m ark \[re mark : li n ear-systems\].  This  implies t h at $W_{\ eta}\simeq \ mathbb{P} ^ { 2}$ or $ \ma thb b{P }^{ 1 } \t imes\mathbb{P } ^ {1}$ .Moreove r,for $W_ {\e ta}  \s ime q\mathbb{P }^{2}$ w eha ve  e ith er $H | _{W_{\et a} } \ si meq  \mat h cal{O} _{\ma thbb {P }^ { 2}} (1)$ or $\ m a thca l{ O} _{\m ath bb {P}^{ 2}}( 2 )$. 

\[the orem:spec ial - scro ll s\ ] In th e above notat io n, if $W_{ \e ta}  \sime q \mathbb{ P}^{2}$ and $H|_{W_{\et a }} \sim eq\math cal{ O}_{\math bb{ P}^{2} }(1 ) $, the n $W$is a$\ mat h b b{P}^ { 2 }$ -bu nd le. Moreov e r , e ither  $ W =\mathrm {Proj}\left(\mathc a l{O }_{\mathbb{P} ^{1 }}(5 ) \ op lus \ ma t hca l{ O }_{ \ m athbb{P}^{1}}(2 )\oplus\ma th c al {O}_{\math b b{P }^ {1}}\ri ght)$ o r $\m a thrm{Pr oj}\left( \mathcal{ O} _{\

By construction_variety $V$_is a point, a_curve or_a_surface. Moreover,_when_$V$ is a_point by Proposition_7.2 in [@Prokhorov-degree] we_have $\dim |-K_{W}|_\leqslant_34$ which contradicts the estimate from Remark \[remark:inequalities\].

In what follows we will treat separately the_cases_when $V$_is_a_curve and a surface.

Proof of_Theorem \[theorem:main\] in the case when_$V$ is_a curve {#section:curve}
=================================================================

We use the notation and assumptions_from_Section \[section:reduction\]. From the_Leray spectral sequence and Kawamata–Vieweg Vanishing Theorem we deduce_that $H^{1}(V,
\mathcal{O}_{V})=H^{1}(W, \mathcal{O}_{W})=0$. Thus, we have_$V
\simeq \mathbb{P}^{1}$ in_the_present_case.

General fibre $W_{\eta}$ of_the contraction $g: W \longrightarrow V$_is a non-singular del Pezzo surface._For $H \in \mathcal{H}_{W}$ divisor $-(K_{W_{\eta}}+H|_{W_{\eta}})$ is_ample by construction and divisor $H|_{W_{\eta}}$_is ample by Remark \[remark:linear-systems\]. This_implies that_$W_{\eta} \simeq \mathbb{P}^{2}$ or $\mathbb{P}^{1}\times\mathbb{P}^{1}$._Moreover, for $W_{\eta}_\simeq \mathbb{P}^{2}$_we have either_$H|_{W_{\eta}} \simeq \mathcal{O}_{\mathbb{P}^{2}}(1)$ or $\mathcal{O}_{\mathbb{P}^{2}}(2)$.

\[theorem:special-scrolls\] In_the above notation,_if $W_{\eta} \simeq \mathbb{P}^{2}$ and $H|_{W_{\eta}}_\simeq_\mathcal{O}_{\mathbb{P}^{2}}(1)$, then $W$_is_a_$\mathbb{P}^{2}$-bundle. Moreover,_either $W =_\mathrm{Proj}\left(\mathcal{O}_{\mathbb{P}^{1}}(5)\oplus\mathcal{O}_{\mathbb{P}^{1}}(2)\oplus\mathcal{O}_{\mathbb{P}^{1}}\right)$_or $\mathrm{Proj}\left(\mathcal{O}_{\