magnitude* $|M_\ast|$ of a finitely presented graded persistence module $M_\ast$ is defined by $$|M_\ast| 
    = 
    \sum_{k=0}^{\infty}
    \sum_{i=1}^{m_k}
    (-1)^k (e^{-a_{k,i}} - e^{-b_{k,i}})$$ where $M_\ast$ has bars $[a_{k,1},b_{k,1}),\ldots,[a_{k,m_k},b_{k,m_k})$ in degree $k\geq 0$. Note that a bar $[a,b)$ makes a contribution of $\pm(e^{-a} - e^{-b})$ to the magnitude, so that longer bars make a greater contribution, in line with the general philosophy of persistent homology.

Persistent magnitude has good formal properties: we show that it is additive with respect to exact sequences, and that the magnitude of a tensor product of persistence modules is the product of the magnitudes of the factors, so long as the tensor product is understood in an appropriate derived sense.

Now suppose that we have a persistent homology theory defined for some class of mathematical objects, for example the Rips homology of metric spaces. By applying persistent magnitude to the persistent homology, we obtain a new numerical invariant of the mathematical objects in question. Our first example of this process is the case of the sublevel set persistent homology of Morse functions, where the resulting magnitude invariant is a (signed and weighted) count of the critical points of the original function.

Our most detailed example of persistent magnitude in action is the *Rips magnitude*. This is the numerical invariant of finite metric spaces obtained by taking the persistent magnitude of the Rips homology, and is given by the weighted simplex-count $$|X|_\mathrm{Rips} 
    = 
    \sum_{\emptyset\neq A\subseteq X}(-1)^{\#A-1}e^{-\operatorname{diam}(A)}.$$ We compute the Rips magnitude of cycle graphs with their path, Euclidean and geodesic metrics. In each case they are determined by a number-theoretical formula reminiscent of the sum of divisors function.

In the original setting of magnitude, defining the magnitude of infinite metric spaces is not straightforward: the simplest method is to take the supremum of the magnitude of all finite subspaces of the given infinite metric space, but there are alternatives, and currently the theory only works well in the
magnitude * $ |M_\ast|$ of a finitely presented graded persistence faculty $ M_\ast$ is define by $ $ |M_\ast| 
     = 
     \sum_{k=0}^{\infty } 
     \sum_{i=1}^{m_k } 
     (-1)^k (e^{-a_{k, i } } - e^{-b_{k, i}})$$ where $ M_\ast$ has bar $ [ a_{k,1},b_{k,1}),\ldots,[a_{k, m_k},b_{k, m_k})$ in academic degree $ k\geq 0$. Note that a bar $ [ a, b)$ makes a contribution of $ \pm(e^{-a } - e^{-b})$ to the order of magnitude, so that long bar make a greater contribution, in tune with the general philosophy of dogged homology. 

 haunting magnitude has good formal properties: we prove that it is additive with respect to exact succession, and that the magnitude of a tensor product of persistence modules is the merchandise of the magnitudes of the factors, so long as the tensor product is understood in an appropriate derive sense. 

 Now suppose that we have a persistent homology hypothesis specify for some class of mathematical objects, for example the Rips homology of metric spaces. By applying persistent magnitude to the haunting homology, we obtain a new numeral invariant of the numerical object in question. Our first example of this process is the case of the sublevel set persistent homology of Morse routine, where the resulting magnitude invariant is a (signed and weighted) count of the critical points of the original function. 

 Our about detailed example of persistent magnitude in action is the * Rips magnitude *. This is the numerical invariant of finite metric space prevail by taking the persistent magnitude of the Rips homology, and is give by the weighted simplex - count $ $ |X|_\mathrm{Rips } 
     = 
     \sum_{\emptyset\neq A\subseteq X}(-1)^{\#A-1}e^{-\operatorname{diam}(A)}.$$ We compute the Rips magnitude of hertz graphs with their path, Euclidean and geodesic system of measurement. In each case they are determine by a number - theoretical formula evocative of the sum of divisors function. 

 In the original setting of order of magnitude, defining the magnitude of infinite measured spaces is not straightforward: the simplest method is to take the supremum of the order of magnitude of all finite subspaces of the given infinite measured space, but there are alternatives, and currently the hypothesis only works well in the
magjitude* $|M_\ast|$ of a finiteln presented gradgd persivtence module $O_\ast$ is defined by $$|M_\ast| 
    = 
    \sun_{k=0}^{\infty}
    \sum_{i=1}^{m_k}
    (-1)^k (e^{-a_{k,i}} - e^{-b_{n,i}})$$ where $M_\asu$ has bars $[a_{k,1},b_{k,1}),\ldots,[a_{k,m_k},b_{k,m_k})$ in fegrze $k\geq 0$. Note thst a bar $[a,t)$ makes a contsicucion of $\pm(e^{-a} - e^{-b})$ to the magnitude, so that lpnher bars make w grtatqr ckntribution, in line with the generzl philmsophy of perxistent homology.

Persistent magjitude has good fogmal properjjes: qe show that it is addpcive with rgspect to exact sequences, and thxt thz magnitude od a jensor produrt of iersistence modules iv the ptoduct of the kagiituees of the factors, so long as the tensot product hs understood in an approptiate derkced sehsx.

Nos supplse that we hzve a persiwtent homology theoty eefined for skme clwsf of mathematical objects, for example tve Dips homology of metric spaces. By applying pgrsistent iagnitude to the persistent homology, we obtain a tew nnmdrieql inxqrlant of the mathematical objects in question. Jhr fprst example of tmis process is the cwsr of the sublexel sec psrsistent homology of Morfe fubctions, wrere the resulting magnitude incariant is a (wigned and weighteb) count of tke crijical loints of the original yunctikn.

Our most fetailed sbample of persisgenn macnitude in action is the *Ryps magnivude*. Chis is ghe mumerisal invariwnt on finite metric spafes oytainad by takijg the persistent magnitude of vie Rips homolpgf, atd is giren by the weighted simplex-count $$|R|_\mathrm{Rnps} 
    = 
    \sum_{\vmptyset\nxq A\subseteq X}(-1)^{\#A-1}e^{-\operatorndle{diam}(A)}.$$ We cmmpute tre Rups nagnituad of cycle gralhs with nhtir path, Eyclidean and geodexic jetrics. In each cawe they are detrrmkneq hy a tumber-theoredicau futmula reminiscenb ow thr sum of divisors futctikn.

In the original xebting of nagnitudq, defining thr magnitude of inflnite mevric slacgs is not straightforward: the sjmplest mfthjd is to takq thc sukremum of tke magnitude of all finite subspaces of vhe given infinite mettic space, but there ate slternativex, and currentlf the theory only woeks well in the
magnitude* $|M_\ast|$ of a finitely presented graded $M_\ast$ defined by = \sum_{k=0}^{\infty} \sum_{i=1}^{m_k} $M_\ast$ bars $[a_{k,1},b_{k,1}),\ldots,[a_{k,m_k},b_{k,m_k})$ in $k\geq 0$. Note a bar $[a,b)$ makes a contribution $\pm(e^{-a} - e^{-b})$ to the magnitude, so that longer bars make a greater in line with the general philosophy of persistent homology. Persistent magnitude has good properties: show it additive with respect to exact sequences, and that the magnitude of a tensor product of persistence is the product of the magnitudes of the so long as the product is understood in an derived Now suppose we a homology theory defined some class of mathematical objects, for example the Rips homology of metric spaces. By applying persistent magnitude the persistent obtain a numerical of mathematical objects in first example of this process is the sublevel set persistent homology of Morse functions, the resulting invariant is a (signed and weighted) of the critical points of the original function. most detailed example of persistent magnitude in action is the *Rips magnitude*. This is the of finite metric spaces by taking the magnitude the homology, is given the weighted simplex-count $$|X|_\mathrm{Rips} = \sum_{\emptyset\neq A\subseteq X}(-1)^{\#A-1}e^{-\operatorname{diam}(A)}.$$ We compute the magnitude of cycle graphs with their path, Euclidean and geodesic each they are determined a number-theoretical formula reminiscent the of divisors function. In setting magnitude, of metric is not straightforward: the method is to take the of the magnitude of given infinite metric space, but there are alternatives, currently the theory only works well in
magnitude* $|M_\ast|$ of a finitely pResented grAded pErsIstEnCe moDule $m_\ast$ is defined bY $$|m_\ast| 
    = 
    \Sum_{k=0}^{\infty}
    \sum_{i=1}^{m_k}
    (-1)^k (e^{-a_{k,i}} - e^{-b_{K,i}})$$ wheRe $m_\Ast$ hAS bArs $[a_{k,1},B_{k,1}),\ldots,[A_{K,m_K},B_{K,m_k})$ In DeGreE $k\GEq 0$. note tHat A bar $[a,b)$ mAkes a contrIbuTiOn of $\pm(e^{-a} - e^{-b})$ to THe Magnitude, sO thAt longer bars MakE a greaTeR coNTribuTioN, in liNe with THe geneRal philosOpHY of perSIstent hOMOlOgy.

PErsistent magnitudE HaS Good formal propErties: We SHoW THat It iS additive wItH respECt to exaCT sEQUEncES, and that the maGnitude of a tENsoR produCt Of pERsisteNce moDuLEs iS the product Of thE magnitudEs of thE Factors, SO long as The tenSor ProDuct IS uNdErsToOD in AN aPprOPriAte derivEd SeNse.

NoW supPOSE That We hAve a PersiStent homology TheOry dEFinEd for Some cLass Of MatheMaticaL objeCtS, for example the RIps hOmology of MetRiC spAcEs. By aPPlying PerSisTent magNitude tO The PeRSIStEnt homology, we obtaiN a NEW nUmerical InvariANt Of THe mathemAtIcaL objECTs in qUestIOn. our first ExamplE Of ThIs proceSs Is the cAsE of The SubleVEl seT persiStent homOlogy OF Morse functionS, Where the resulTInG MAgNItudE inVariant is a (sIgneD And wEighTEd) CouNT of thE critIcAL pOInts of the original fuNcTion.

OuR most Detailed exampLe of persisTENT magnituDe in ACtIOn is the *Rips magNitudE*. This is the NUmerical InvarIant of fiNite metriC SPaces obtAinEd bY taKinG THe Persistent magNITude Of The Rips HomOlogy, anD is GivEn bY thE wEighted siMplex-couNt $$|x|_\mAtHrM{RiPs} 
    = 
    \sum_{\EMptyset\nEq a\suBsEteQ X}(-1)^{\#A-1}e^{-\oPEratorName{dIam}(A)}.$$ we CoMPutE the RipS MaGNItudE oF cYcle GraPhS with TheiR PatH, EuclidEan and geoDesIC metRiCs. in each cAse they are detErMined by a nuMbEr-tHeoretICAl formulA reminiscent of the sum of dIVisors fUncTion.

IN the Original sEttIng of mAgnITude, deFining The maGnItuDE Of infINItE meTrIc spaces is NOT stRaighTfOrwaRd: the siMplest method is to taKE thE supremum of thE maGnitUDE oF alL FiNIte SuBSpaCES of the given infiNite metric SpACe, But there arE AltErNatives, And currEntly THe theorY only workS well in thE
magnitude* $|M_\ast|$ of a  finitelyprese nte d g ra dedpers istence module $M_\ ast$ is defined by $$| M_\as t| 
  =
   \sum_{k = 0} ^ { \in ft y} 
  \ su m_{i= 1}^ {m_k}
   (-1)^k(e^ {- a_{k,i}} - e ^ {- b_{k,i}})$ $ w here $M_\ast $ h as bar s$[a _ {k,1} ,b_ {k,1} ),\ldo t s,[a_{ k,m_k},b_ {k , m_k})$ in degr e e  $ k\ge q 0$. Note that a ba r  $[a,b)$ makes  a con tr i bu t i onof$\pm(e^{-a }- e^{ - b})$ to th e m agn i tude, so that  longer bar s  ma ke a g re ate r  contr ibuti on ,  in  line withthegeneral p hiloso p hy of p e rsisten t homo log y.
Per s is te ntma g nit u de  ha s  go od forma lpr opert ies: w e show  th at i t isadditive with  re spec t  to  exac t seq uenc es , and  thatthe m ag nitude of a ten sorproduct o f p er sis te nce m o dulesisthe  produc t of th e  ma gn i t u de s of the factors,so l on g as the  tenso r  p ro d uct is u nd ers tood i n anappr o pr iate der ived s e ns e. 

Now s up pose t ha t w e h ave a pers istent  homolog y the o ry defined for some class of ma t h em a tica l o bjects, for  exa m pletheR ip s h o molog y ofme t ri c  spaces. By applyin gpersis tentmagnitude tothe persis t e n t homolo gy,w eo btain a new nu meric al invaria n t of the  math ematical  objectsi n  questio n.Our  fi rst e xa mple of thisp r oces sis thecas e of th e s ubl eve l s et  persiste nt homol og yof  M ors e fun c tions, w he reth e r esult i ng mag nitud e in va ri a ntis a (s i gn e d  and  w ei ghte d)co unt o f th e  cr iticalpoints of  th e  ori gi na l funct ion.

Our mos tdetailed e xa mpl e of p e r sistentmagnitude in action ist he *Rip s m agnit ude* . This is  th e nume ric a l inva riantof fi ni tem e trics p ac esob tained byt a kin g the  p ersi stent m agnitude of the Ri p s h omology, andisgive n by  th e  w e igh te d  si m p lex-count $$|X| _\mathrm{R ip s }
    = 
  \s um _{\empt yset\ne q A\s u bseteqX}(-1)^{\ #A-1}e^{- \o pera t o rna me{diam}(A )}.$$ We  computet he Ri p smagni tud e of c yc legraph s with the ir pa th, Eu cl ideanand g eo desic me trics. In each case the y aredeter min ed by a n umb e r-t heoretica l fo rmula remi nis cen t ofthe sum o f di v is ors funct ion. 
In the o r ig ina l se tting of ma g n i tud e, de fin i ng the  mag nitude of infinit e  metric spaces  isn o t s tra i ghtf or ward: the simp les tm e thod isto  take the s upremumof the m agnitu de ofall fin i t es ubspac es o f t he giveninf in i te metr ic  s p ace, b ut t he re are  alter n ativ e s , and currentlythe t h e ory o n lyworks  w ell int he
magnitude* $|M_\ast|$_of a_finitely presented graded persistence_module $M_\ast$_is_defined by_$$|M_\ast|_
  _ = 
_   \sum_{k=0}^{\infty}
_  _\sum_{i=1}^{m_k}
_   (-1)^k (e^{-a_{k,i}} - e^{-b_{k,i}})$$ where $M_\ast$ has bars $[a_{k,1},b_{k,1}),\ldots,[a_{k,m_k},b_{k,m_k})$ in degree_$k\geq_0$. Note_that_a_bar $[a,b)$ makes a contribution_of $\pm(e^{-a} - e^{-b})$ to_the magnitude,_so that longer bars make a greater contribution,_in_line with the_general philosophy of persistent homology.

Persistent magnitude has good formal_properties: we show that it is_additive with respect_to_exact_sequences, and that the_magnitude of a tensor product of_persistence modules is the product of_the magnitudes of the factors, so long_as the tensor product is understood_in an appropriate derived sense.

Now_suppose that_we have a persistent homology_theory defined for_some class_of mathematical objects,_for example the Rips homology of_metric spaces. By_applying persistent magnitude to the persistent_homology,_we obtain a_new_numerical_invariant of_the mathematical objects_in_question. Our_first_example of this process is the_case_of the sublevel set persistent homology of_Morse functions, where the_resulting_magnitude invariant is a_(signed and weighted) count of_the critical points of the original_function.

Our most_detailed example_of persistent magnitude in action is the *Rips magnitude*. This is_the numerical invariant of finite metric_spaces obtained by taking_the persistent_magnitude_of the Rips_homology,_and is_given by the weighted simplex-count $$|X|_\mathrm{Rips} 
_ _ = 
   _\sum_{\emptyset\neq A\subseteq X}(-1)^{\#A-1}e^{-\operatorname{diam}(A)}.$$ We_compute_the Rips magnitude of cycle graphs_with their path, Euclidean and geodesic_metrics. In each case they_are_determined_by a number-theoretical formula reminiscent_of the sum of divisors function.

In_the original setting_of magnitude, defining the magnitude of infinite_metric_spaces is not straightforward: the simplest_method_is to take the supremum of_the_magnitude_of all finite subspaces of_the given infinite metric space, but_there are alternatives, and currently the theory only works_well in the