

Evaluation at positive integers defines a natural, surjective, equivariant $*$[-]{}homomorphism $\pi\colon T(A_m,\alpha_m^n)\to \bigoplus A_m$. Its kernel is naturally isomorphic to $\bigoplus \Sigma A_m$. Thus we obtain a natural extension $$0 \longrightarrow \bigoplus \Sigma A_m
  \overset{\iota}\longrightarrow T(A_m,\alpha_m^n)
  \overset{\pi}\longrightarrow \bigoplus A_m
  \longrightarrow 0.$$ Build the diagram  for this extension. The map $\bigoplus \Sigma A_n\to \operatorname{cone}(\pi)$ is a homotopy equivalence in a natural and hence equivariant fashion. Hence the extension is admissible. Moreover, one easily identifies the map $\Sigma\bigl(\bigoplus
  A_m\bigr)\to\bigoplus \Sigma A_m$ with $S-{{\mathrm{id}}}$, where $S$ is the shift map defined above. Rotating the extension triangle, we obtain an exact triangle $$\xymatrix@1@C=3.5em{
    T(A_m,\alpha_m^n) \ar[r]^-{-\pi} &
    \bigoplus A_m \ar[r]^-{{{\mathrm{id}}}-S} &
    \bigoplus A_m \ar[r]^-{\Sigma^{-1}\iota} &
    \Sigma^{-1} T(A_m,\alpha_m^n).
  }$$ This implies $\Sigma^{-1} T(A_m,\alpha_m^n) \cong \operatorname{ho-\!\varinjlim}(A_m,\alpha_m^n)$ and hence the assertion.

To obtain a concrete criterion for admissibility, we let $\tilde{T}(A_m,\alpha_m^n)$ be the variant of $T(A_m,\alpha_m^n)$ where we require $\lim_{t\to\infty} \alpha_m^\infty(f_m(t))$ to exist in $A_\infty$ instead of $\lim f_m(t)=0$. The algebra $\tilde{T}(A_m,\alpha_m^n)$ is equivariantly contractible in a natural way. The contracting homotopy is obtained by making sense of the formula $H_s f(t){\mathrel{:=}}\alpha_{[st
Evaluation at positive integers defines a natural, surjective, equivariant $ * $ [ -]{}homomorphism $ \pi\colon T(A_m,\alpha_m^n)\to \bigoplus A_m$. Its kernel is naturally isomorphous to $ \bigoplus \Sigma A_m$. therefore we prevail a natural elongation $ $ 0 \longrightarrow \bigoplus \Sigma A_m 
   \overset{\iota}\longrightarrow T(A_m,\alpha_m^n) 
   \overset{\pi}\longrightarrow \bigoplus A_m 
   \longrightarrow 0.$$ build up the diagram    for this extension. The map $ \bigoplus \Sigma A_n\to \operatorname{cone}(\pi)$ is a homotopy comparison in a lifelike and hence equivariant fashion. Hence the extension is admissible. Moreover, one well identifies the map $ \Sigma\bigl(\bigoplus 
   A_m\bigr)\to\bigoplus \Sigma A_m$ with $ S-{{\mathrm{id}}}$, where   $ S$ is the shift map define above. Rotating the elongation triangle, we obtain an accurate triangle $ $ \xymatrix@1@C=3.5em { 
     T(A_m,\alpha_m^n) \ar[r]^-{-\pi } & 
     \bigoplus A_m \ar[r]^-{{{\mathrm{id}}}-S } & 
     \bigoplus A_m \ar[r]^-{\Sigma^{-1}\iota } & 
     \Sigma^{-1 } T(A_m,\alpha_m^n). 
   } $ $ This implies $ \Sigma^{-1 } T(A_m,\alpha_m^n) \cong \operatorname{ho-\!\varinjlim}(A_m,\alpha_m^n)$ and hence the affirmation. 

 To obtain a concrete criterion for admissibility, we let $ \tilde{T}(A_m,\alpha_m^n)$ be the variant of $ T(A_m,\alpha_m^n)$ where we require $ \lim_{t\to\infty } \alpha_m^\infty(f_m(t))$ to exist in   $ A_\infty$ alternatively of $ \lim f_m(t)=0$. The algebra $ \tilde{T}(A_m,\alpha_m^n)$ is equivariantly contractible in a natural way. The contracting homotopy is obtained by making common sense of the formula $ H_s f(t){\mathrel{:=}}\alpha_{[st


Evapuation at positive inteners defines a ncrural, vurjecfive, equkvariant $*$[-]{}homomorphism $\pi\coloi T(A_n,\alphq_m^n)\to \bigoplus A_m$. Its yernel is naturaloy iwimorphic to $\bigoplmf \Sifla A_k$. Thus we obtaik a natural extension $$0 \lotgfiyhtarrow \bigoplus \Sigma A_m
  \overset{\ijta}\longtihhtarrow T(A_m,\alkha_m^n)
  \ovedset{\pi}\longrightarrow \bigoplus A_m
  \mongrigitarrow 0.$$ Build yhe diagram  for this extendion. The map $\bigoplus \Digma A_n\to \iperwrorname{cone}(\pk)$ is a homotopy equivamence in a natural and hence eqjivarnant fashiob. Yenfg the extensmon is admissible. Moreover, one eaxily identifiex tie mqp $\Sigma\bigl(\bigoplus
  A_m\bigr)\to\bigoplus \Figma A_m$ fich $S-{{\mathrm{id}}}$, where $S$ iw rhe svift map eefknes ebobe. Rotwtiig the extehsion triantle, we obtain an exsce triangle $$\xymztrix@1@C=3.5qm{
    T(A_m,\alpha_m^n) \ar[r]^-{-\pi} &
    \bigoplus A_m \ar[g]^-{{{\matgrm{id}}}-S} &
    \bigoplus A_m \qr[r]^-{\Sigma^{-1}\iota} &
    \Sigmw^{-1} T(A_m,\alphw_m^n).
  }$$ This implies $\Sigma^{-1} T(A_m,\alpha_m^n) \cong \operatortame{hk-\!\xarnkmlim}(X_n,\appha_m^n)$ and hence the assertion.

To obtain a consdeue briterion for admlssibility, we let $\yipdr{J}(A_m,\alpha_m^n)$ be jhe varnznf of $T(A_m,\alpha_m^n)$ whfre we tequirw $\lim_{t\to\igfty} \alpha_m^\infty(f_m(t))$ to exist in $Q_\infty$ instecd if $\lim f_m(t)=0$. The algzbra $\tilde{T}(A_o,\alpna_m^n)$ os equivariantly contraetible in a naturwl way. Ths contracting homutoiy iv obtainta by making sense of the firmuka $H_s f(g){\matnrel{:=}}\al[ha_{[st
Evaluation at positive integers defines a natural, $*$[-]{}homomorphism T(A_m,\alpha_m^n)\to \bigoplus Its kernel is A_m$. we obtain a extension $$0 \longrightarrow \Sigma A_m \overset{\iota}\longrightarrow T(A_m,\alpha_m^n) \overset{\pi}\longrightarrow \bigoplus \longrightarrow 0.$$ Build the diagram for this extension. The map $\bigoplus \Sigma A_n\to is a homotopy equivalence in a natural and hence equivariant fashion. Hence the is Moreover, easily the map $\Sigma\bigl(\bigoplus A_m\bigr)\to\bigoplus \Sigma A_m$ with $S-{{\mathrm{id}}}$, where $S$ is the shift map defined above. the extension triangle, we obtain an exact triangle T(A_m,\alpha_m^n) \ar[r]^-{-\pi} & \bigoplus \ar[r]^-{{{\mathrm{id}}}-S} & \bigoplus A_m \ar[r]^-{\Sigma^{-1}\iota} \Sigma^{-1} }$$ This $\Sigma^{-1} \cong and hence the To obtain a concrete criterion for admissibility, we let $\tilde{T}(A_m,\alpha_m^n)$ be the variant of $T(A_m,\alpha_m^n)$ where we $\lim_{t\to\infty} \alpha_m^\infty(f_m(t))$ in $A_\infty$ of f_m(t)=0$. algebra $\tilde{T}(A_m,\alpha_m^n)$ is in a natural way. The contracting by making sense of the formula $H_s f(t){\mathrel{:=}}\alpha_{[st


Evaluation at positive integErs defines A natuRal, SurJeCtivE, equIvariant $*$[-]{}homomoRPhisM $\pi\colon T(A_m,\alpha_m^n)\to \biGopluS A_M$. its kERnEl is nAturallY IsOMOrpHiC tO $\biGoPLuS \SigmA A_m$. thus we oBtain a natuRal ExTension $$0 \longrIGhTarrow \bigoPluS \Sigma A_m
  \overSet{\Iota}\loNgRigHTarroW T(A_M,\alphA_m^n)
  \oveRSet{\pi}\lOngrightaRrOW \bigopLUs A_m
  \lonGRIgHtarRow 0.$$ Build the diagraM  FoR This extension. THe map $\bIgOPlUS \sigMa A_N\to \operatoRnAme{coNE}(\pi)$ is a hOMoTOPY eqUIvalence in a naTural and henCE eqUivariAnT faSHion. HeNce thE eXTenSion is admisSiblE. Moreover, One easILy identIFies the Map $\SigMa\bIgl(\BigoPLuS
  A_M\biGr)\TO\biGOpLus \sIgmA A_m$ with $S-{{\MaThRm{id}}}$, wHere $s$ IS THe shIft Map dEfineD above. RotatinG thE extENsiOn triAngle, We obTaIn an eXact trIanglE $$\xYmatrix@1@C=3.5em{
    T(A_m,\alPha_m^N) \ar[r]^-{-\pi} &
    \bigOplUs a_m \aR[r]^-{{{\MathrM{Id}}}-S} &
    \bigOplUs A_M \ar[r]^-{\SigMa^{-1}\iota} &
    \SIGma^{-1} t(A_M,\ALPhA_m^n).
  }$$ This implies $\SigmA^{-1} T(a_M,\AlPha_m^n) \conG \operaTOrNaME{ho-\!\varinJlIm}(A_M,\alpHA_M^n)$ and HencE ThE assertiOn.

To obTAiN a ConcretE cRiteriOn For AdmIssibILity, We let $\tIlde{T}(A_m,\aLpha_m^N)$ Be the variant of $t(a_m,\alpha_m^n)$ wherE We REQuIRe $\liM_{t\tO\infty} \alpha_M^\infTY(f_m(t))$ To exISt In $A_\INfty$ iNsteaD oF $\LiM F_m(t)=0$. The algebra $\tilde{T}(a_m,\Alpha_m^N)$ is eqUivariantly coNtractible IN A Natural wAy. ThE CoNTracting homotoPy is oBtained by mAKing sensE of thE formula $h_s f(t){\mathrEL{:=}}\Alpha_{[st


Evaluation at positive i ntegers de fines  anat ur al,surj ective, equiva r iant  $*$[-]{}homomorphism$\pi\ co l on T ( A_ m,\al pha_m^n ) \t o \bi go pl usA_ m $.  Itsker nel isnaturallyiso mo rphic to $\b i go plus \Sigm a A _m$. Thus we  ob tain a  n atu r al ex ten sion$$0 \l o ngrigh tarrow \b ig o plus \ S igma A_ m  \ove rset{\iota}\longr i gh t arrow T(A_m,\a lpha_m ^n ) 
\ ove rse t{\pi}\lon gr ighta r row \bi g op l u s  A_ m 
  \longright arrow 0.$$B uil d thedi agr a m  for  this  e x ten sion. The m ap $ \bigoplus  \Sigm a  A_n\to \operat orname {co ne} (\pi ) $is  aho m oto p yequ i val ence inana tural  and h e n ce e qui vari ant f ashion. Hence  th e ex t ens ion i s adm issi bl e. Mo reover , one  e asily identifie s th e map $\S igm a\ big l( \bigo p lus
 A_m \bi gr)\to\ bigoplu s  \S ig m a A_ m$ with $S-{{\math rm { i d} }}$, whe re $S$ is  t h e shiftma p d efin e d  abov e. R o ta ting the  exten s io ntriangl e,  we ob ta inanexact tria ngle $ $\xymatr ix@1@ C =3.5em{
    T( A _m,\alpha_m^n )  \ a r [r ] ^-{- \pi } &
    \bi gopl u s A_ m \a r [r ]^- { {{\ma thrm{ id } }} - S} &
    \bigoplusA_ m \ar[ r]^-{ \Sigma^{-1}\i ota} &
  \ S igma^{-1 } T( A _m , \alpha_m^n).
 }$$This impli e s $\Sigm a^{-1 } T(A_m, \alpha_m^ n )  \cong \ ope rat orn ame { h o- \!\varinjlim} ( A _m,\ al pha_m^n )$and hen cethe  as ser ti on.

To o btain aco nc re te  cr iteri o n for ad mi ssi bi lit y, we let $\ tilde {T}( A_ m, \ alp ha_m^n) $  b e theva ri antof$T (A_m, \alp h a_m ^n)$ wh ere we re qui r e $\ li m_ {t\to\i nfty} \alpha_ m^ \infty(f_m (t ))$  to ex i s t in $A_ \infty$ instead of $\li m  f_m(t) =0$ . The  alg ebra $\ti lde {T}(A_ m,\ a lpha_m ^n)$ i s equ iv ari a n tly c o n tr act ib le in a na t u ral  way.  T he c ontract ing homotopy is ob t ain ed by makingsen se o f th e f o rm u la$H _ s f ( t ){\mathrel{:=}} \alpha_{[s t


Evaluation at_positive integers_defines a natural, surjective,_equivariant $*$[-]{}homomorphism_$\pi\colon_T(A_m,\alpha_m^n)\to \bigoplus_A_m$._Its kernel is_naturally isomorphic to_$\bigoplus \Sigma A_m$. Thus_we obtain a_natural_extension $$0 \longrightarrow \bigoplus \Sigma A_m
  \overset{\iota}\longrightarrow T(A_m,\alpha_m^n)
  \overset{\pi}\longrightarrow \bigoplus A_m
 _\longrightarrow_0.$$ Build_the_diagram _for this extension. The map_$\bigoplus \Sigma A_n\to \operatorname{cone}(\pi)$ is_a homotopy_equivalence in a natural and hence equivariant fashion._Hence_the extension is_admissible. Moreover, one easily identifies the map $\Sigma\bigl(\bigoplus
 _A_m\bigr)\to\bigoplus \Sigma A_m$ with $S-{{\mathrm{id}}}$, where $S$_is the shift_map_defined_above. Rotating the extension_triangle, we obtain an exact triangle_$$\xymatrix@1@C=3.5em{
    T(A_m,\alpha_m^n) \ar[r]^-{-\pi}_&
    \bigoplus A_m \ar[r]^-{{{\mathrm{id}}}-S}_&
    \bigoplus A_m_\ar[r]^-{\Sigma^{-1}\iota} &
   _\Sigma^{-1} T(A_m,\alpha_m^n).
_ }$$ This implies $\Sigma^{-1}_T(A_m,\alpha_m^n) \cong \operatorname{ho-\!\varinjlim}(A_m,\alpha_m^n)$_and hence_the assertion.

To obtain_a concrete criterion for admissibility, we_let $\tilde{T}(A_m,\alpha_m^n)$ be_the variant of $T(A_m,\alpha_m^n)$ where we_require_$\lim_{t\to\infty} \alpha_m^\infty(f_m(t))$ to_exist_in $A_\infty$_instead of_$\lim f_m(t)=0$. The_algebra_$\tilde{T}(A_m,\alpha_m^n)$ is_equivariantly_contractible in a natural way. The_contracting_homotopy is obtained by making sense of_the formula $H_s f(t){\mathrel{:=}}\alpha_{[st