-Compton scattering of (synchrotron) X-ray photons by the electrons themselves in the standard SSC model, a flare at TeV energies must be [*preceded*]{} by an accompanying flare at X-ray energies. While the model might still be able to accommodate the presence of orphan X-ray flares, the presence of orphan TeV flares seems problematic. On the other hand, the “orphan” TeV flares in Mrk 421 (as shown Fig. 9) and in 1ES1959+650 (Krawczynski et al. 2004) might not be orphan events after all. In both cases, the gamma-ray flares seem to be preceded by X-ray flares, which could be attributed to the SSC process although the X-ray lead (of 1–2 days) would seem too long. Alternatively, it might be possible to attribute the X-ray lead to some sort of feedback between different emission regions in the jet (i.e., an orphan X-ray flare in one region triggers an orphan TeV in another).

Genuine orphan TeV flaring would not be easy to understand in the hadronic models either, despite looser coupling between the X-ray and TeV emission, unless the injected e/p ratio changes significantly from flare to flare. Any change in the proton population will likely be accompanied by a change in the electron (primary or secondary) population, so TeV and X-ray flares should both occur as a result. Interestingly, orphan TeV flares may be understood in a hybrid scenario in which protons are present in the jet in substantial quantities but are not necessarily dominant compared to the lepton component (Böttcher 2004). In this case, an orphan TeV flare is associated with (and [**]{}follows) a pair of simultaneous X-ray and TeV flares that originate in the standard SSC process. The synchrotron (X-ray) photons are then reflected off some external cloud and return to the jet (following a substantial delay with respect to the initial flares). The returned photons interact with the protons in the jet to produce pions and subsequent $\pi^0$ decay produces TeV photons in the flare. The model was shown to be able to account for the “orphan” TeV flare observed in 1ES1959+650 (Böttcher 2004). It might also explain some of the similar flares in Mrk 421, for example, the one shown in Fig. 9, if it is a composite of two gamma-ray flares (see discussion in § 
-Compton scattering of (synchrotron) X - ray photons by the electron themselves in the standard SSC exemplar, a flare at TeV energies must be [ * precede * ] { } by an accompany flare at X - beam energies. While the model might however be able to accommodate the presence of orphan adam - ray flares, the bearing of orphan TeV flares seems problematic. On the other hand, the “ orphan ” TeV flares in Mrk 421 (as shown Fig.   9) and in 1ES1959 + 650 (Krawczynski et al. 2004) might not be orphan event after all. In both cases, the da gamma - ray flares look to be preceded by ten - ray flares, which could be attributed to the SSC process although the X - re lead (of 1–2 days) would seem too long. Alternatively, it might be possible to attribute the X - ray lead to some sort of feedback between different emission regions in the jet (i.e., an orphan X - ray solar flare in one region triggers an orphan TeV in another). 

 actual orphan TeV flaring would not be comfortable to understand in the hadronic models either, despite looser coupling between the ten - ray and TeV emission, unless the injected e / p proportion changes significantly from flare to flare. Any change in the proton population will likely be accompanied by a change in the electron (primary or secondary) population, so TeV and X - re flares should both happen as a resultant role. Interestingly, orphan TeV flares may be understood in a hybrid scenario in which protons are present in the jet in solid quantities but are not necessarily dominant compare to the lepton component (Böttcher 2004). In this case, an orphan TeV flare is associated with (and [ * * ] { } trace) a couple of simultaneous X - ray and TeV flares that originate in the standard SSC process. The synchrotron (ten - ray) photon are then reflected off some external cloud and fall to the jet (following a substantial delay with respect to the initial flare). The returned photons interact with the protons in the jet to produce pions and subsequent $ \pi^0 $ decay produces TeV photons in the solar flare. The model was shown to be able to report for the “ orphan ” TeV flare observed in 1ES1959 + 650 (Böttcher 2004). It might also explain some of the similar flares in Mrk 421, for example, the one show in Fig.   9, if it is a composite of two gamma - ray flares (see discussion in §
-Comoton scattering of (synchvotron) X-ray photons by vhe eledtrons tfemselves in the standard SSR moeel, a flare at TeV energies must be [*ireceded*]{} vy ai accompanying flare at W-xay ehcrgiev. While the modgl might stinl be able to dczolmodate the presence of orphan X-ray flares, tje presence of orpnwn TsN nlares seems problematic. On the kther hend, the “orphan” YeV flares in Mrk 421 (as showj Fih. 9) and in 1ES1959+650 (Krawczjnski et al. 2004) midyt not be orohan events after all. Jn both cases, the gamma-ray flards sezm to be prgewdef by X-ray fleres, wrich could bc attrituted tp the SSC proccss anthiugh the X-ray lead (of 1–2 days) would seem joo long. Antzrnatively, it might bw possitle do agrricutt tie S-ray lfad to some skrt of feedvack between differtnt vkission regikns in tre jet (i.e., an orphan X-ray flare in one rtgion triggers an orphan TeV in another).

Genuine orkhan TeV fjaring would not be easy to understand in the hadsonic oodtlw eitfwr, despite looser coupling between the X-ray and FeF vmission, unless tme injected e/p ratoo cnwnges signifizantly frkm flare to flare. Wny chagge ib the prouon pppulation will likely be acxompanied by q change in the elzctron (primaxy or xeconcary) population, so TeV cnd X-rzy flares sjould botg occur as a resuut. Pntesestingly, orphan TeV flaref may be nnderxtood iv a nybrid scenario ln whlwh protons are predent nn tha jet in skbstantial quantities but are not necessarily dmmitant com'ared bo the lepton cjmponent (Böttchgr 2004). In thns casd, an orphah TeV fnare is assjciated with (djd [**]{}follows) a pair of simyltabeous X-fxy and TeV flates that originate un the standard SSG prozsss. The synchrocxob (X-ray) photons sre thqn rxflecead off some axtefnau cloua and rtcurk tu thr jet (following a sutstahtial delay with rrsiect to tye initiwl flares). The returned photons lnterect wivh the prjtons in the jet to produce pikns and skbscquent $\pi^0$ decwy pvoduses TeV phptons in the flare. The model was shown vo be able to account fir the “orphan” TeV fksre observev in 1EF1959+650 (Böttcher 2004). It might also explqin some of the slmilar flares in Mrk 421, ror exdmple, the one shown in Fig. 9, if it is a composite of two gamma-ray flares (see disxussioi yn § 
-Compton scattering of (synchrotron) X-ray photons by themselves the standard model, a flare [*preceded*]{} an accompanying flare X-ray energies. While model might still be able to the presence of orphan X-ray flares, the presence of orphan TeV flares seems On the other hand, the “orphan” TeV flares in Mrk 421 (as shown 9) in (Krawczynski al. 2004) might not be orphan events after all. In both cases, the gamma-ray flares seem be preceded by X-ray flares, which could be to the SSC process the X-ray lead (of 1–2 would too long. it be to attribute the lead to some sort of feedback between different emission regions in the jet (i.e., an orphan X-ray in one an orphan in Genuine TeV flaring would easy to understand in the hadronic looser coupling between the X-ray and TeV emission, the injected ratio changes significantly from flare to Any change in the proton population will likely accompanied by a change in the electron (primary or secondary) population, so TeV and X-ray both occur as a Interestingly, orphan TeV may understood a scenario in protons are present in the jet in substantial quantities but are necessarily dominant compared to the lepton component (Böttcher 2004). In an TeV flare is with (and [**]{}follows) a of X-ray and TeV flares in standard synchrotron photons then reflected off some cloud and return to the (following a substantial delay flares). The returned photons interact with the protons the jet to produce pions and subsequent decay produces TeV photons in the flare. The model was shown to able to the “orphan” TeV flare observed in 1ES1959+650 (Böttcher It might also explain of the similar flares in Mrk 421, for example, one in Fig. if it is composite of two flares (see discussion
-Compton scattering of (synchrOtron) X-ray pHotonS by The ElEctrOns tHemselves in the STandArd SSC model, a flare at TeV EnergIeS Must BE [*pRecedEd*]{} by an aCCoMPAnyInG fLarE aT x-rAy eneRgiEs. While The model miGht StIll be able to aCCoMmodate the PreSence of orphaN X-rAy flarEs, The PResenCe oF orphAn TeV fLAres seEms probleMaTIc. On thE Other haND, ThE “orpHan” TeV flares in Mrk 421 (AS sHOwn Fig. 9) and in 1ES1959+650 (KRawczyNsKI eT AL. 2004) miGht Not be orphaN eVents AFter all. iN bOTH CasES, the gamma-ray fLares seem to BE prEceded By x-raY Flares, Which CoULd bE attributed To thE SSC proceSs althOUgh the X-RAy lead (oF 1–2 days) wOulD seEm toO LoNg. altErNAtiVElY, it MIghT be possiBlE tO attrIbutE THE x-ray LeaD to sOme soRt of feedback bEtwEen dIFfeRent eMissiOn reGiOns in The jet (I.e., an oRpHan X-ray flare in oNe reGion triggErs An OrpHaN TeV iN AnotheR).

GeNuiNe orphaN TeV flaRIng WoULD NoT be easy to understanD iN THe Hadronic Models EItHeR, Despite lOoSer CoupLINg betWeen THe x-ray and TEV emisSIoN, uNless thE iNjecteD e/P raTio ChangES sigNificaNtly from Flare TO flare. Any changE In the proton poPUlATIoN Will LikEly be accompAnieD By a cHangE In The ELectrOn (priMaRY oR Secondary) population, So teV and x-ray fLares should boTh occur as a RESUlt. InterEstiNGlY, Orphan TeV flareS may bE understooD In a hybriD scenArio in whIch protonS ARe presenT in The Jet In sUBStAntial quantitIES but ArE not necEssArily doMinAnt ComParEd To the leptOn componEnT (BÖtTcHer 2004). in thiS Case, an orPhAn TEV FlaRe is aSSociatEd witH (and [**]{}FoLlOWs) a Pair of sIMuLTAneoUs x-rAy anD Tev fLares That ORigInate in The standaRd Ssc proCeSs. the syncHrotron (X-ray) phOtOns are then ReFleCted ofF SOme exterNal cloud and return to the jET (followIng A subsTantIal delay wIth RespecT to THe initIal flaRes). ThE rEtuRNEd phoTONs IntErAct with the PROtoNs in tHe Jet tO producE pions and subsequenT $\Pi^0$ dEcay produces TEV pHotoNS In The FLaRE. ThE mODel WAS shown to be able tO account foR tHE “oRphan” TeV flARe oBsErved in 1eS1959+650 (BöttcHer 2004). It MIght alsO explain sOme of the sImIlar FLAreS in Mrk 421, for eXample, thE one shown IN Fig. 9, iF It Is a coMpoSite of TwO gaMma-raY flareS (See DiscuSsion iN § 
-Compton scattering of (sy nchrotron)  X-ra y p hot on s by  the  electrons the m selv es in the standard SSC  mode l, a fl a re  at T eV ener g ie s mus tbe  [* pr e ce ded*] {}by an a ccompanyin g f la re at X-raye ne rgies. Whi lethe model mi ght  still  b e a b le to  ac commo date t h e pres ence of o rp h an X-r a y flare s ,  t he p resence of orphan Te V  flares seemsproble ma t ic . Onthe  other han d,  the“ orphan” Te V f lar e s in Mrk 421(as shown F i g.9) and  i n 1 E S1959+ 650 ( Kr a wcz ynski et al . 20 04) might  not b e  orphan eventsafterall . I n bo t hca ses ,t heg am ma- r ayflares s ee mto be  pre c e d e d by  X- rayflare s, which coul d b e at t rib utedto th e SS Cproce ss alt hough  t he X-ray lead ( of 1 –2 days)wou ld  se em  tool ong. A lte rna tively,  it mig h t b ep o s si ble to attribute t he X -r ay leadto som e  s or t  of feed ba ckbetw e e n dif fere n temission  regio n sin  the je t(i.e.,  a n o rph an X- r ay f lare i n one re giont riggers an orp h an TeV in ano t he r ) .Genu ine  orphan TeV  fla r ingwoul d  n otb e eas y toun d er s tand in the hadroni cmodels  eith er, despite l ooser coup l i n g betwee n th e  X - ray and TeV em issio n, unlesst he injec ted e /p ratio  changess i gnifican tly  fr omfla r e  t o flare. Anyc h ange  i n the p rot on popu lat ion  wi llli kely be a ccompani ed  b yacha nge i n  the ele ct ron  ( pri maryo r seco ndary ) po pu la t ion , so Te V  a n d  X-r ay  f lare s s ho uld b otho ccu r as aresult. I nte r esti ng ly , orpha n TeV flaresma y be under st ood  in ah y brid sce nario in which protonsa re pres ent  in t he j et in sub sta ntialqua n tities  but a re no tnec e s saril y do min an t compared t o t he le pt on c omponen t (Böttcher 2004). Inthis case, an  or phan T eV  fl a re isas s oci a t ed with (and [* *]{}follow s) apair of si m ult an eous X- ray and  TeVf lares t hat origi nate in t he  sta n d ard  SSC proce ss. Thesynchrotr o n (X- r ay ) pho ton s areth enrefle cted o f f s ome e xterna lcloudand r et urn to t he jet (following a sub stanti al de lay  with res pec t  to  the init ialflares). T heret urned  ph o tonsinte r ac t w i th th e pr o tons in t h ejet t oproduce pio n s and  subs equ e nt $\p i^0$  decay produces T e V photons in t he f l a re.  Th e  mod el  was shown tobeab l e  to acco un t for the “ orphan”Te V  flar e obse rved i n 1ES19 5 9 +6 5 0 (Böt tche r 2 004). Itmig ht also ex pl ai n  someof t he  simil ar fla r es i n Mrk 421, for exa mple, t he on e  sh own i nFig. 9, if i t is a com posite of t wo gam ma-r ay fl ares (s ee  discu ssi on  in § 
-Compton scattering_of (synchrotron)_X-ray photons by the_electrons themselves_in_the standard_SSC_model, a flare_at TeV energies_must be [*preceded*]{} by_an accompanying flare_at_X-ray energies. While the model might still be able to accommodate the presence of_orphan_X-ray flares,_the_presence_of orphan TeV flares seems_problematic. On the other hand,_the “orphan”_TeV flares in Mrk 421 (as shown Fig. 9)_and_in 1ES1959+650 (Krawczynski_et al. 2004) might not be orphan events after_all. In both cases, the gamma-ray_flares seem to_be_preceded_by X-ray flares, which_could be attributed to the SSC_process although the X-ray lead (of_1–2 days) would seem too long. Alternatively,_it might be possible to attribute_the X-ray lead to some_sort of_feedback between different emission regions_in the jet_(i.e., an_orphan X-ray flare_in one region triggers an orphan_TeV in another).

Genuine_orphan TeV flaring would not be_easy_to understand in_the_hadronic_models either,_despite looser coupling_between_the X-ray_and_TeV emission, unless the injected e/p_ratio_changes significantly from flare to flare. Any_change in the proton_population_will likely be accompanied_by a change in the_electron (primary or secondary) population, so_TeV and_X-ray flares_should both occur as a result. Interestingly, orphan TeV flares may_be understood in a hybrid scenario_in which protons are_present in_the_jet in substantial_quantities_but are_not necessarily dominant compared to the lepton_component (Böttcher_2004). In this case, an orphan_TeV flare is associated_with_(and [**]{}follows) a pair of simultaneous_X-ray and TeV flares that originate_in the standard SSC process._The_synchrotron_(X-ray) photons are then reflected_off some external cloud and return_to the jet_(following a substantial delay with respect to_the_initial flares). The returned photons interact_with_the protons in the jet to_produce_pions_and subsequent $\pi^0$ decay produces_TeV photons in the flare. The_model was shown to be able to account for_the “orphan” TeV_flare observed in 1ES1959+650 (Böttcher_2004)._It_might also explain some of the similar flares in Mrk_421, for_example, the one_shown in Fig. 9, if it is a composite of two_gamma-ray flares (see discussion in § 