 m$ of $E$ by zeros as described in Section 4.4. The matrix $\hat
E$ depends on a number $\bar \alpha$ and determines the operator $\hat H^-_{20}$.\
[**5$^{th}$ step:**]{} The matrix elements $\hat{\mathcal{E}}(\hat n, \hat d) $ of $\hat H^-_N = \Omega^-_N (\hat
H^-_{20})$ are calculated from the matrix elements $\hat E (\hat k,
\hat m)$ the same way as the $\mathcal{E} (\hat n, \hat d)$ are calculated from $E (\hat k, \hat m)$ in Section 3.5. In this connection the general results of the Sections 6.1 and 6.2 are useful.\
[**6$^{th}$ step:**]{} One determines the orthogonal submatrices of the matrix of $\hat H^-_N$ according to Section 6.3 and diagonalizes them as many as possible numerically or analytically.\
Then one can try to obtain error estimates applying suitable results of the theory of spectral approximation.\
[**7.1.2:**]{} As mentioned at the end of Section 6.4, the lowest energy levels of $\hat{H}^-_N$ are not simply Hartree-Fock-like approximations of the true values, if $N$ is smaller than $\bar \alpha$. Thus in this case the method presented here reproduces also those results, which are obtained by other methods like density functional theory (DFT) or configuration interaction method (CI). Summing up, it is intuitively clear that the approximation of $H^-_N$ by $\hat H^-_N$ is the better the smaller the number $N$ and the larger the parameter $\bar \alpha$, which in turn is limited by the capacity of computers. My colleague Arno Schindlmayr is preparing an application of the proposed method.

Finite procedures
-----------------

[**7.2.1:**]{} The program described in Section 7.1.1 is a [*work*]{} program in a strict sense only if all its steps could be carried through in finite time. Thus, the critical points are found in those steps which contain infinite tasks. The first and decisive one is the determination of the infinite ONB $\mathcal{O}_1$ in the second step. For one has to expect that in most cases ${\mathcal{O}}_1$ can neither analytically nor numerically be calculated
m$ of $ E$ by zeros as described in Section 4.4. The matrix $ \hat 
 E$ depends on a numeral $ \bar \alpha$ and determine the operator $ \hat H^-_{20}$.\ 
 [ * * 5$^{th}$ step :* * ] { } The matrix elements $ \hat{\mathcal{E}}(\hat n, \hat d) $ of $ \hat H^-_N = \Omega^-_N (\hat 
 H^-_{20})$ are calculated from the matrix component $ \hat E (\hat k, 
 \hat m)$ the same room as the $ \mathcal{E } (\hat n, \hat d)$ are forecast from $ E (\hat k, \hat m)$ in part 3.5. In this connection the general resultant role of the Sections 6.1 and 6.2 are useful.\ 
 [ * * 6$^{th}$ step :* * ] { } One determines the extraneous submatrices of the matrix of $ \hat H^-_N$ according to Section 6.3 and diagonalizes them as many as possible numerically or analytically.\ 
 Then one can try to obtain mistake estimates applying suitable resultant role of the theory of spectral approximation.\ 
 [ * * 7.1.2 :* * ] { } As mentioned at the end of part 6.4, the lowest energy levels of $ \hat{H}^-_N$ are not simply Hartree - Fock - like approximation of the true values, if $ N$ is smaller than $ \bar \alpha$. Thus in this case the method presented here reproduces also those results, which are obtained by other methods like density functional theory (DFT) or configuration interaction method acting (CI). summarize up, it is intuitively clear that the estimate of $ H^-_N$ by $ \hat H^-_N$ is the dependable the small the number $ N$ and the larger the argument $ \bar \alpha$, which in turn is specify by the capacity of computers. My colleague Arno Schindlmayr is prepare an application of the proposed method. 

 Finite procedures 
 ----------------- 

 [ * * 7.2.1 :* * ] { } The program described in Section 7.1.1 is a [ * study * ] { } program in a strict sense only if all its footprint could be behave through in finite time. Thus, the critical points are found in those steps which control infinite tasks. The first and critical one is the determination of the countless ONB $ \mathcal{O}_1 $ in the second step. For one has to expect that in most cases $ { \mathcal{O}}_1 $ can neither analytically nor numerically be calculated
 m$ lf $E$ by zeros as describtd in Section 4.4. Thg natrix $\hat
E$ sepends un a number $\bar \alpha$ and devermunes uke operator $\hat H^-_{20}$.\
[**5$^{th}$ rtep:**]{} The latrix eoemeits $\hat{\mathcal{E}}(\hef n, \hat d) $ of $\mat H^-_U = \Omega^-_N (\hat
H^-_{20})$ ate calculateg from the matsib zlements $\hat E (\hat k,
\hat m)$ the same wwy as tne $\mathcal{E} (\hat g, \hau d)$ are baoculated from $E (\hat k, \hat m)$ ih Sectimn 3.5. In this cpnnection the general resupts lf the Sections 6.1 ajd 6.2 are usedul.\
[**6$^{tr}$ step:**]{} One degermines the orthogonam submatrices of the matrix of $\fat H^-_U$ according ti Sfwtion 6.3 and viagonwlizes them as many ds possoble numericalky mr qnalytically.\
Then one ran try to obtain ertor estimadea applying suitaboe resunts mf tfw tfeody or spechram approximztion.\
[**7.1.2:**]{} As mebtioned at the end pf Wection 6.4, the mowest egergy levels of $\hat{H}^-_N$ are not simply Hagtres-Fock-like approximationw of the true values, lf $N$ is sialler than $\bar \alpha$. Thus in this case the methog preadnttd here eeoroduces also those results, which are obtaineq bu pther methods jike densitu vumstional theori (DFT) ox cknfiguration interwction iethoe (CI). Summyng ip, it is intuitively clear rhat the appgoxination of $H^-_N$ by $\hac H^-_N$ is the yetter the xmaller the number $N$ anb the marger the oarameter $\car \alpha$, which kn nurn is limiudd by the capacitr of compnters. My colueagoe Arno Schindlmajr is preparing an applifatiou of dhe proposfd method.

Finite procedures
-----------------

[**7.2.1:**]{} The 'cogram descrineg it Sectiou 7.1.1 is s [*work*]{} prograi in a strict xense ouly if all its sneps coulv be carried through in fhjite time. Thns, the cryticql piints afd found in thoxe steps ckich contqin infinite tasks. Thg rirst and decisnre one is the detrrmknaeiln os the infinita ONC $\mxyhcal{U}_1$ in tht sccovd syep. For one has to efpecf that in most casrs ${\mathcal{I}}_1$ can neyther analytivally nor numericaply bx calcnlated
m$ of $E$ by zeros as described 4.4. matrix $\hat depends on a the $\hat H^-_{20}$.\ [**5$^{th}$ The matrix elements n, \hat d) $ of $\hat = \Omega^-_N (\hat H^-_{20})$ are calculated from the matrix elements $\hat E (\hat \hat m)$ the same way as the $\mathcal{E} (\hat n, \hat d)$ are from (\hat \hat in Section 3.5. In this connection the general results of the Sections 6.1 and 6.2 are [**6$^{th}$ step:**]{} One determines the orthogonal submatrices of matrix of $\hat H^-_N$ to Section 6.3 and diagonalizes as as possible or Then can try to error estimates applying suitable results of the theory of spectral approximation.\ [**7.1.2:**]{} As mentioned at the end Section 6.4, energy levels $\hat{H}^-_N$ not Hartree-Fock-like approximations of values, if $N$ is smaller than in this case the method presented here reproduces those results, are obtained by other methods like functional theory (DFT) or configuration interaction method (CI). up, it is intuitively clear that the approximation of $H^-_N$ by $\hat H^-_N$ is the smaller the number $N$ the larger the $\bar which turn limited by capacity of computers. My colleague Arno Schindlmayr is preparing an application the proposed method. Finite procedures ----------------- [**7.2.1:**]{} The program described 7.1.1 a [*work*]{} program a strict sense only all steps could be carried finite Thus, are in steps which contain infinite The first and decisive one the determination of the second step. For one has to expect that most cases ${\mathcal{O}}_1$ can neither analytically nor be calculated
 m$ of $E$ by zeros as described in SEction 4.4. The mAtrix $\Hat
e$ dePeNds oN a nuMber $\bar \alpha$ anD DeteRmines the operator $\hat H^-_{20}$.\
[**5$^{tH}$ step:**]{} thE MatrIX eLemenTs $\hat{\maTHcAL{e}}(\haT n, \HaT d) $ oF $\hAT H^-_n = \OmegA^-_N (\hAt
H^-_{20})$ are cAlculated fRom ThE matrix elemeNTs $\Hat E (\hat k,
\haT m)$ tHe same way as tHe $\mAthcal{e} (\hAt n, \HAt d)$ arE caLculaTed froM $e (\hat k, \hAt m)$ in SectIoN 3.5. in this COnnectiON ThE genEral results of the SECtIOns 6.1 and 6.2 are usefuL.\
[**6$^{th}$ steP:**]{} ONE dETErmIneS the orthogOnAl subMAtrices OF tHE MAtrIX of $\hat H^-_N$ accorDing to SectiON 6.3 anD diagoNaLizES them aS many As POssIble numericAlly Or analytiCally.\
THEn one caN Try to obTain erRor EstImatES aPpLyiNg SUitABlE reSUltS of the thEoRy Of speCtraL APPRoxiMatIon.\
[**7.1.2:**]{} AS mentIoned at the end Of SEctiON 6.4, thE loweSt eneRgy lEvEls of $\Hat{H}^-_N$ aRe not SiMply Hartree-Fock-Like ApproximaTioNs Of tHe True vALues, if $n$ is SmaLler thaN $\bar \alpHA$. ThUs IN THiS case the method presEnTED hEre reproDuces aLSo ThOSe resultS, wHicH are OBTaineD by oTHeR methods Like deNSiTy FunctioNaL theorY (DfT) oR coNfiguRAtioN interAction meThod (Ci). summing up, it is iNTuitively cleaR ThAT ThE ApprOxiMation of $H^-_N$ bY $\hat h^-_n$ is tHe beTTeR thE SmallEr the NuMBeR $n$ and the larger the parAmEter $\baR \alphA$, which in turn iS limited by THE Capacity Of coMPuTErs. My colleague arno SChindlmayr IS prepariNg an aPplicatiOn of the prOPOsed methOd.

FIniTe pRocEDUrEs
-----------------

[**7.2.1:**]{} The program dESCribEd In SectiOn 7.1.1 iS a [*work*]{} pRogRam In a StrIcT sense onlY if all itS sTePs CoUld Be carRIed throuGh In fInIte Time. THUs, the cRiticAl poInTs ARe fOund in tHOsE STeps WhIcH conTaiN iNfiniTe taSKs. THe first And decisiVe oNE is tHe DeTerminaTion of the infiNiTe ONB $\mathcAl{o}_1$ in The secOND step. For One has to expect that in mosT Cases ${\maThcAl{O}}_1$ caN neiTher analyTicAlly noR nuMEricalLy be caLculaTeD
 m$ of $E$ by zeros as des cribed inSecti on4.4 .Thematr ix $\hat
E$ de p ends  on a number $\bar \al pha$an d  det e rm inesthe ope r at o r  $\ ha tH^- _{ 2 0} $.\
[ **5 $^{th}$  step:**]{ } T he  matrix elem e nt s $\hat{\m ath cal{E}}(\hat  n,  \hatd)  $o f $\h atH^-_N  = \Om e ga^-_N  (\hat
H^ -_ { 20})$a re calc u l at ed f rom the matrix el e me n ts $\hat E (\h at k,\h a tm ) $ t hesame way a sthe $ \ mathcal { E} ( \ hat n, \hat d)$ a re calculat e d f rom $E  ( \ha t  k, \h at m) $i n S ection 3.5.  Inthis conn ection the gen e ral res ults o f t heSect i on s6.1  a n d 6 . 2are use ful.\
[* *6 $^ {th}$  ste p : * * ]{}One  det ermin es the orthog ona l su b mat rices  of t he m at rix o f $\ha t H^- _N $ according toSect ion 6.3 a nddi ago na lizes them a s m any  as pos sible n u mer ic a l l yor analytically.\Th e n  o ne can t ry too bt ai n  error e st ima tesa p plyin g su i ta ble resu lts of th etheoryof  spect ra l a ppr oxima t ion. \
[**7 .1.2:**] {} As mentioned at t h e end of Sect i on 6 .4 ,  the  lo west energy  lev e ls o f $\ h at {H} ^ -_N$are n ot si m ply Hartree-Fock-li ke  appro ximat ions of the t rue values , i f $N$ is  sma l le r  than $\bar \a lpha$ . Thus int his case  themethod p resentedh e re repro duc esals o t h o se  results, whi c h  are  o btained  by  othermet hod s l ike  d ensity fu nctional  t he or y(DF T) or configur at ion  i nte racti o n meth od (C I).Su mm i ngup, iti si n tuit iv el y cl ear  t hat t he a p pro ximatio n of $H^- _N$ by $ \h at  H^-_N$  is the bette rthe smalle rthe  numbe r $N$ andthe larger the paramete r  $\bar\al pha$,  whi ch in tur n i s limi ted by the  capac ity o fcom p u ters. M ycol le ague ArnoS c hin dlmay ris p reparin g an application o f  th e proposed me tho d.
F i ni tep ro c edu re s 
-- - - -------------
[**7.2.1:* *] { }The progra m  de sc ribed i n Secti on 7. 1 .1 is a  [*work*] {} progra min a s tri ct sense o nly if a ll its st e ps co u ld  be c arr ied th ro ugh  in f initet ime . Thu s, the  c ritica l poi nt s are fo und in those steps whic h cont ain i nfi nite task s.T hefirst and  dec isive oneisthe  dete rmi n ation  oft he  in f inite  ONB $\mathcal { O} _1$ i nthe seconds t e p.For o neh as toexpe ct that in most c a ses ${\mathcal {O}} _ 1 $ c ann eith er  analyticallynor  n u m erically  b e calculate d
 m$_of $E$_by zeros as described_in Section_4.4._The matrix_$\hat
E$_depends on a_number $\bar \alpha$_and determines the operator_$\hat H^-_{20}$.\
[**5$^{th}$ step:**]{}_The_matrix elements $\hat{\mathcal{E}}(\hat n, \hat d) $ of $\hat H^-_N = \Omega^-_N (\hat
H^-_{20})$ are_calculated_from the_matrix_elements_$\hat E (\hat k,
\hat m)$_the same way as the_$\mathcal{E} (\hat_n, \hat d)$ are calculated from $E (\hat_k,_\hat m)$ in_Section 3.5. In this connection the general results of_the Sections 6.1 and 6.2 are_useful.\
[**6$^{th}$ step:**]{} One_determines_the_orthogonal submatrices of the_matrix of $\hat H^-_N$ according to_Section 6.3 and diagonalizes them as_many as possible numerically or analytically.\
Then one_can try to obtain error estimates_applying suitable results of the_theory of_spectral approximation.\
[**7.1.2:**]{} As mentioned at_the end of_Section 6.4,_the lowest energy_levels of $\hat{H}^-_N$ are not simply_Hartree-Fock-like approximations of_the true values, if $N$ is_smaller_than $\bar \alpha$._Thus_in_this case_the method presented_here_reproduces also_those_results, which are obtained by other_methods_like density functional theory (DFT) or configuration_interaction method (CI). Summing_up,_it is intuitively clear_that the approximation of $H^-_N$_by $\hat H^-_N$ is the better_the smaller_the number_$N$ and the larger the parameter $\bar \alpha$, which in turn_is limited by the capacity of_computers. My colleague Arno_Schindlmayr is_preparing_an application of_the_proposed method.

Finite_procedures
-----------------

[**7.2.1:**]{} The program described in Section 7.1.1_is a_[*work*]{} program in a strict sense_only if all its_steps_could be carried through in finite_time. Thus, the critical points are_found in those steps which_contain_infinite_tasks. The first and decisive_one is the determination of the_infinite ONB $\mathcal{O}_1$_in the second step. For one has_to_expect that in most cases ${\mathcal{O}}_1$_can_neither analytically nor numerically be calculated