isation, and overall $U(1)'$ neutrality implies they can even be much larger than the galactic escape velocity. It has been pointed out [@foot14] that this effect can give rise to observable keV electron recoils in direct detection experiments. It might even be possible to explain the DAMA annual modulation signal [@dama1a; @dama1b; @dama2a; @dama2b; @dama2c] in this manner, since the constraints on electron recoils provided by other experiments are generally much weaker than those of nuclear recoils. However, a detailed description of the plasma dark matter density and velocity distribution in the vicinity of the Earth is required. This is a highly non-trivial problem. If the dark plasma has interactions with ordinary matter then it will by captured by the Earth, forming an approximate “dark sphere” within. Understanding the interaction of the dark plasma with this dark sphere as the Earth moves through the halo is therefore of primary importance. The aim of this paper is to provide a consistent description of this interaction in order to qualitatively understand the implications for direct detection.

The captured dark sphere within the Earth forms an obstacle to the dark plasma wind. Two limiting cases can be envisaged: (1) if the captured dark matter is largely neutral, i.e. poorly conducting, then the dark plasma wind will be absorbed by the dark sphere, or; (2) if the captured dark matter is largely ionised, then the obstacle forms a conducting sphere which effectively deflects the dark plasma wind. Interestingly, these limiting cases appear analogous to the solar wind interaction with the Moon and Venus, respectively (e.g. [@Spreiter70; @Luhmann04]); this is sketched in Figure \[FigMoonVenus\]. The Moon has no magnetic field and no atmosphere, so that the solar wind is largely absorbed at the lunar surface with very little upwind activity. Venus has no magnetic field, but forms an electrically conductive layer at the edge of its ionosphere, which at first approximation forms an impenetrable obstacle to the solar wind. These systems have been studied using magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) models, and this would seem to be an appropriate starting point for studying the dark plasma wind interaction with the captured dark matter within the Earth.

![[The solar wind interaction with Moon/Venus. These systems appear to represent useful analogues to the possible ways in which the dark plasma wind interacts with captured dark
isation, and overall $ U(1)'$ neutrality implies they can even be much larger than the astronomic evasion velocity. It has been pointed out [ @foot14 ] that this consequence can hold rise to observable keV electron recoil in lineal detection experiments. It might even be possible to explain the DAMA annual modulation signal [ @dama1a; @dama1b; @dama2a; @dama2b; @dama2c ] in this manner, since the constraint on electron recoils provided by early experiments are generally a lot weaker than those of nuclear recoil. However, a detailed description of the plasma dark topic density and velocity distribution in the vicinity of the Earth is required. This is a highly non - superficial problem. If the dark plasma hold interaction with ordinary topic then it will by captured by the Earth, forming an approximate “ dark sphere ” within. understand the interaction of the dark plasma with this dark sphere as the Earth moves through the halo is consequently of chief importance. The aim of this paper is to provide a consistent description of this interaction in order to qualitatively understand the implications for direct detection. 

 The capture dark sphere within the Earth form an obstacle to the dark plasma wind. Two limiting cases can be imagine: (1) if the captured blue matter is largely neutral, i.e. ill conducting, then the dark plasma wind will be absorbed by the dark sphere, or; (2) if the captured dark matter is largely ionised, then the obstacle forms a conducting sector which effectively parry the dark plasma wind. Interestingly, these limiting cases appear analogous to the solar fart interaction with the Moon and Venus, respectively (e.g. [ @Spreiter70; @Luhmann04 ]); this is sketched in Figure   \[FigMoonVenus\ ]. The Moon take no charismatic field and no atmosphere, so that the solar wind is largely absorbed at the lunar surface with very fiddling upwind activity. Venus has no charismatic field, but forms an electrically conductive layer at the edge of its ionosphere, which at inaugural approximation form an impenetrable obstacle to the solar wind. These system have been studied using magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) models, and this would seem to be an appropriate starting point for studying the dark plasma wind interaction with the captured dark topic within the Earth. 

! [ [ The solar wind interaction with Moon / Venus. These systems look to represent useful analogues to the potential ways in which the dark plasma wind interacts with captured dark
isahion, and overall $U(1)'$ neutrxlity implies tkwy can even ge much uarger than the galactic escepe celocuty. It has been pointea out [@foon14] that thus ehfect can give rmae to onfervznle kzV electron recolls in direwt detection efpdrnments. It might even be possible to qxplain tje DAMA annual modllwtioh signal [@dama1a; @dama1b; @dama2a; @dama2b; @dzma2c] in this manner, xince the constraints on epectgon recoils providfd by other expqeiments are eenerally much weaker jhan those of nuclear recoils. Hodever, a detailee eesftiption of tie plafma dark matbvr denshty and velocity distvibutmon un the vicinity of thx Earth is required. Jhis is a viyhly non-trivial problwm. If tve ddrk ooasoa gax jnteraftikns with oddinary matrer then it will by cwiyured by the Earth, fjrming an approximate “dark sphere” withit. Uhderstanding the interaxtion of the dark pladma with ehis dark sphere as the Earth moves through the hdlo ia thtrcnore if primary importance. The aim of this paper is ek kronide a consistent descriptiom lf jhis interactiun in ordsr to qualitativelj underftand the implycatoons for direct detection.

Thw captured dcrk sphere within the Earth formr an obstscle to the dark plasma wins. Two limitlng cases zan be envisaged: (1) in tve captured dark matter is largely ieutrcl, i.e. pourly condusting, then the dark plasma wind wipl be atsorbed by the dark sphere, or; (2) if the capvnred dark matjer is largely ionixed, then the jbstacle forms a condbcting sphere whpch effecvively deflests the dark [pasma wind. Iiterestindly, rhesw limitkvg cases appeat analogols to rhe solar wind intcractkkn with the Moou qnd Venus, respevtixelr (v.g. [@Xpwaiter70; @Luhmant04]); thks kx skegched in Finurd \[FigKoonVenus\]. The Moon hds nk magnetic field amd no atmowphere, sj that the sokar wind is largelj absmrbxd at yhe lunar surface with very littls upwind wctlvity. Venus hws ni magnetic fneld, but forms an electrically conductivx layer at the edge of uts ionosphere, whick st first ap'roximwtion forks an impenetrable ovstacle to the sokar wind. These systema have been studied using magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) models, and this would seem to be ab appropriate starfing poinn fjx studyyng vhx dark plasma winc interaction with the captured dark madtzr within the Earth.

![[The solar eivd interactiov with Moon/Venus. These sgstems alpear to represent useful analobues to the possible wayx in whixh ths dark plarma wind interacts with eapturwd dark
isation, and overall $U(1)'$ neutrality implies they be larger than galactic escape velocity. [@foot14] this effect can rise to observable electron recoils in direct detection experiments. might even be possible to explain the DAMA annual modulation signal [@dama1a; @dama1b; @dama2b; @dama2c] in this manner, since the constraints on electron recoils provided by experiments generally weaker those of nuclear recoils. However, a detailed description of the plasma dark matter density and velocity in the vicinity of the Earth is required. is a highly non-trivial If the dark plasma has with matter then will captured the Earth, forming approximate “dark sphere” within. Understanding the interaction of the dark plasma with this dark sphere as the moves through is therefore primary The of this paper provide a consistent description of this to qualitatively understand the implications for direct detection. captured dark within the Earth forms an obstacle the dark plasma wind. Two limiting cases can envisaged: (1) if the captured dark matter is largely neutral, i.e. poorly conducting, then the wind will be absorbed the dark sphere, (2) the dark is largely then the obstacle forms a conducting sphere which effectively deflects the plasma wind. Interestingly, these limiting cases appear analogous to the interaction the Moon and respectively (e.g. [@Spreiter70; @Luhmann04]); is in Figure \[FigMoonVenus\]. The no field so the wind is largely absorbed the lunar surface with very upwind activity. Venus has an electrically conductive layer at the edge of ionosphere, which at first approximation forms an obstacle to the solar wind. These systems have been studied using magnetohydrodynamic models, and seem to be an appropriate starting point for the dark plasma wind with the captured dark matter within the Earth. ![[The wind with Moon/Venus. systems appear to useful analogues to possible ways in dark plasma interacts captured
isation, and overall $U(1)'$ neutralIty implies They cAn eVen Be Much LargEr than the galacTIc esCape velocity. It has been pOinteD oUT [@fooT14] ThAt thiS effect CAn GIVe rIsE tO obSeRVaBle kev elEctron rEcoils in diRecT dEtection expeRImEnts. It mighT evEn be possible To eXplain ThE DAma annuAl mOdulaTion siGNal [@damA1a; @dama1b; @daMa2A; @Dama2b; @dAMa2c] in thIS MaNner, Since the constrainTS oN Electron recoilS proviDeD By OTHer ExpEriments arE gEneraLLy much wEAkER THan THose of nuclear Recoils. HoweVEr, a DetailEd DesCRiptioN of thE pLAsmA dark matter DensIty and velOcity dIStributIOn in the ViciniTy oF thE EarTH iS rEquIrED. ThIS iS a hIGhlY non-trivIaL pRobleM. If tHE DARk plAsmA has InterActions with orDinAry mATteR then It wilL by cApTured By the EArth, fOrMing an approximaTe “daRk sphere” wIthIn. undErStandINg the iNteRacTion of tHe dark pLAsmA wITH ThIs dark sphere as the EArTH MoVes throuGh the hALo Is THerefore Of PriMary IMPortaNce. THE aIm of this Paper iS To PrOvide a cOnSistenT dEscRipTion oF This InteraCtion in oRder tO Qualitatively uNDerstand the imPLiCATiONs foR diRect detectiOn.

ThE CaptUred DArK spHEre wiThin tHe eArTH forms an obstacle to tHe Dark plAsma wInd. Two limitinG cases can bE ENVisaged: (1) iF the CApTUred dark matter Is larGely neutraL, I.e. poorly ConduCting, theN the dark pLASma wind wIll Be aBsoRbeD BY tHe dark sphere, oR; (2) IF the CaPtured dArk Matter iS laRgeLy iOniSeD, then the oBstacle fOrMs A cOnDucTing sPHere whicH eFfeCtIveLy defLEcts thE dark PlasMa WiND. InTerestiNGlY, THese LiMiTing CasEs AppeaR anaLOgoUs to the Solar wind IntERactIoN wIth the MOon and Venus, reSpEctively (e.g. [@spReiTer70; @LuhMANn04]); this is Sketched in Figure \[FigMoonvEnus\]. The mooN has nO magNetic fielD anD no atmOspHEre, so tHat the Solar WiNd iS LArgelY ABsOrbEd At the lunar SURfaCe witH vEry lIttle upWind activity. Venus hAS no Magnetic field, But FormS AN eLecTRiCAllY cONduCTIve layer at the edGe of its ionOsPHeRe, which at fIRst ApProximaTion forMs an iMPenetraBle obstacLe to the soLaR winD. tHesE systems haVe been stUdied usinG MagneTOhYdrodYnaMic (MHD) MoDelS, and tHis wouLD seEm to bE an appRoPriate StartInG point foR studying the dark plasma wInd intEractIon With the caPtuREd dArk matter WithIn the Earth.

![[the SolAr winD inTEractIon wITh mooN/venus. thesE Systems apPEaR to REPrEsent useful ANALogUes to The POssiblE wayS in which the dark plASma wind interacTs wiTH CapTurED darK
isation, and overall $U(1) '$ neutral ity i mpl ies  t heycaneven be much l a rger  than the galactic esc ape v el o city .  I t has  been p o in t e d o ut  [ @fo ot 1 4]  that  th is effe ct can giv e r is e to observa b le  keV elect ron  recoils indir ect de te cti o n exp eri ments . It m i ght ev en be pos si b le toe xplaint h eDAMA  annual modulatio n  s i gnal [@dama1a;  @dama 1b ;  @ d a ma2 a;@dama2b; @ da ma2c] in this ma n n e r,s ince the cons traints one lec tron r ec oil s  provi ded b yo the r experimen ts a re genera lly mu c h weake r  than t hose o f n ucl earr ec oi ls.  H o wev e r,  ad eta iled des cr ip tionof t h e p lasm a d arkmatte r density and  ve loci t y d istri butio n in  t he vi cinity  of t he  Earth is requi red.  This isa h ig hly  n on-tr i vial p rob lem . If th e darkp las ma h a sinteractions withor d i na ry matte r then it  w i ll by ca pt ure d by t he Ea rth, fo rming an  appro x im at e “dark  s phere”  w ith in.  Unde r stan ding t he inter actio n  of the dark p l asma with thi s  d a r ks pher e a s the Earth  mov e s th roug h  t heh alo i s the re f or e  of primary importa nc e. The  aimof this paper  is to pro v i d e a cons iste n td escription ofthisinteractio n  in orde r toqualitat ively und e r stand th e i mpl ica tio n s  f or direct det e c tion .
The ca ptu red dar k s phe rewit hi n the Ear th forms  a nob st acl e tot he darkpl asm awin d. Tw o  limit ing c ases  c an beenvisag e d: ( 1) i fth e ca ptu re d dar k ma t ter  is lar gely neut ral ,  i.e .po orly co nducting, the nthe dark p la sma  windw i ll be ab sorbed by the dark sphe r e, or;(2)  if t he c aptured d ark  matte r i s  large ly ion ised,  t hen t he ob s t ac lefo rms a cond u c tin g sph er e wh ich eff ectively deflectst hedark plasma w ind . In t e re sti n gl y , t he s e l i m iting cases app ear analog ou s  t o the sola r  wi nd  intera ction w ith t h e Moonand Venus , respect iv ely( e .g.  [@Spreite r70; @Lu hmann04]) ;  this is  sket che d in F ig ure  \[Fi gMoonV e nus \]. T he Moo nhas no  magn et ic field  and no atmosphere, sothat t he so lar  wind islar g ely  absorbed  atthe lunarsur fac e wit h v e ry li ttle up win d  acti vity .  Venus ha s  n o m a g ne tic field,b u t  fo rms a n e l ectric ally  conductive layer at the edge of  its i ono sph e re,wh ich at first a ppr ox i m ation fo rm s an impene trable o bs t acleto the  solar  wind.T h es e  syste ms h ave  been stu die du sing ma gn et o hydrod ynam ic  (MHD)  model s , an d this would seemto be a n app r opr iatest artingp oint  for study ing the dar k plas ma w ind i nteract io n with  th ecaptured d a rk matter  with in theEa rth. 

! [[Thesola r windinte ra cti on with M o o n/ V en us .  Th esesyste ms  app ear to re p resent u sef u l analo gu est o  the p o ss i b le ways in  wh ich t h e  dark plas m a wi n di ntera cts wi th cap tured d a rk
isation, and_overall $U(1)'$_neutrality implies they can_even be_much_larger than_the_galactic escape velocity._It has been_pointed out [@foot14] that_this effect can_give_rise to observable keV electron recoils in direct detection experiments. It might even be_possible_to explain_the_DAMA_annual modulation signal [@dama1a; @dama1b;_@dama2a; @dama2b; @dama2c] in this_manner, since_the constraints on electron recoils provided by other_experiments_are generally much_weaker than those of nuclear recoils. However, a detailed_description of the plasma dark matter_density and velocity_distribution_in_the vicinity of the_Earth is required. This is a_highly non-trivial problem. If the dark_plasma has interactions with ordinary matter then_it will by captured by the_Earth, forming an approximate “dark_sphere” within._Understanding the interaction of the_dark plasma with_this dark_sphere as the_Earth moves through the halo is_therefore of primary_importance. The aim of this paper_is_to provide a_consistent_description_of this_interaction in order_to_qualitatively understand_the_implications for direct detection.

The captured dark_sphere_within the Earth forms an obstacle to_the dark plasma wind._Two_limiting cases can be_envisaged: (1) if the captured_dark matter is largely neutral, i.e._poorly conducting,_then the_dark plasma wind will be absorbed by the dark sphere, or;_(2) if the captured dark matter_is largely ionised, then_the obstacle_forms_a conducting sphere_which_effectively deflects_the dark plasma wind. Interestingly, these limiting_cases appear_analogous to the solar wind interaction_with the Moon and_Venus,_respectively (e.g. [@Spreiter70; @Luhmann04]); this is_sketched in Figure \[FigMoonVenus\]. The Moon has_no magnetic field and no_atmosphere,_so_that the solar wind is_largely absorbed at the lunar surface_with very little_upwind activity. Venus has no magnetic field,_but_forms an electrically conductive layer at_the_edge of its ionosphere, which at_first_approximation_forms an impenetrable obstacle to_the solar wind. These systems have_been studied using magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) models, and this would_seem to be_an appropriate starting point for_studying_the_dark plasma wind interaction with the captured dark matter within_the Earth.

![[The_solar wind interaction_with Moon/Venus. These systems appear to represent useful analogues to_the possible ways in which the dark_plasma wind interacts with captured dark