 right-handed slepton and $\langle v^2 \rangle$ represents the average of the squared velocity of the LSP, which could be determined by a close inspection of the scattering of the LSP off the thermal radiations. For the case of $E\gg m_{LSP}$, we estimate the elastic scattering cross section off an electron in the thermal bath to be of the order of $$\langle \sigma v_{rel} \rangle \sim  \alpha^{\prime 2}
    \frac{E T_R(\phi )}{m_{\tilde e_R}^4},$$ where $E$ is the energy of the LSP, yielding the interaction rate $\Gamma$ versus the expansion rate $H$ $$\frac{\Gamma}{H} \sim \alpha^{\prime 2}
    \frac{E T_R(\phi )^2 M}{m_{\tilde e_R}^4} \sim
    10^4 \left( \frac{E}{10^2 {\rm GeV}} \right).$$ This implies that by a series of scattering, the LSPs, which were energetic when produced, lose their momenta substantially and they will go to the non-relativistic energy region. Once entering in the non-relativistic region, however, their momentum loss is at most about the background temperature at one collision and they do not likely reach their kinetic equilibrium. Therefore we expect[If the LSP is in kinetic equilibrium, the average $\langle v^2\rangle$ is of order $T_R(\phi )/m_{LSP} \sim 10^{-4}$.]{} $$\frac{T_R(\phi )}{m_{LSP}} \ll \langle v^2 \rangle \ll 1.$$ Even with our ignorance of the precise value of $\langle v^2 \rangle$, we can see that the annihilation cross section is not large enough. Indeed, taking $m_{\tilde l_R} = m_{LSP} \sim 10^2$ GeV, Eq. (\[bann1\]) leads $$\langle \sigma_{ann} v_{rel} \rangle =
    \pi \alpha^{\prime 2} \frac{1}{m_{LSP}^2} \langle v^2\rangle
    \sim 3  \langle v^2 \rangle \times 10^{-8} {\rm GeV^{-2}},$$ which is smaller than the requisite annihilation cross section (\[required-cross-section\]) even for $\langle v^2
right - handed slepton and $ \langle v^2 \rangle$ represents the average of the squared velocity of the LSP, which could be determined by a cheeseparing inspection of the dispersion of the LSP off the thermal radiations. For the case of $ E\gg m_{LSP}$, we estimate the elastic disperse cross section off an electron in the thermal bathroom to be of the club of $ $ \langle \sigma v_{rel } \rangle \sim   \alpha^{\prime 2 } 
     \frac{E T_R(\phi) } { m_{\tilde e_R}^4},$$ where $ E$ is the energy of the LSP, succumb the interaction rate $ \Gamma$ versus the expansion rate $ H$ $ $ \frac{\Gamma}{H } \sim \alpha^{\prime 2 } 
     \frac{E T_R(\phi) ^2 M}{m_{\tilde e_R}^4 } \sim 
     10 ^ 4 \left (\frac{E}{10 ^ 2 { \rm GeV } } \right).$$ This incriminate that by a series of scattering, the LSPs, which were energetic when produce, miss their momenta substantially and they will go to the non - relativistic energy region. Once embark in the non - relativistic region, however, their momentum loss is at most about the background temperature at one collision and they do not probably reach their kinetic chemical equilibrium. Therefore we expect[If the LSP is in energizing equilibrium, the median $ \langle v^2\rangle$ is of order $ T_R(\phi) /m_{LSP } \sim 10^{-4}$. ] { } $ $ \frac{T_R(\phi) } { m_{LSP } } \ll \langle v^2 \rangle \ll 1.$$ Even with our ignorance of the precise value of $ \langle v^2 \rangle$, we can see that the annihilation hybridization section is not large enough. Indeed, taking $ m_{\tilde l_R } = m_{LSP } \sim 10 ^ 2 $ GeV, Eq.   (\[bann1\ ]) leads $ $ \langle \sigma_{ann } v_{rel } \rangle = 
     \pi \alpha^{\prime 2 } \frac{1}{m_{LSP}^2 } \langle v^2\rangle 
     \sim 3   \langle v^2 \rangle \times 10^{-8 } { \rm GeV^{-2}},$$ which is smaller than the requisite annihilation cross section (\[required - cross - section\ ]) even for $ \langle v^2
 rihht-handed slepton and $\lakgle v^2 \rangle$ rekrwsents the aberage ow the squared velocity of thx LSP, whixh could be determined by a clode inspextioi of the scattermhg of tmz LSP lff chx thermal radiajions. For tha case of $E\gg k_{LRP}$, we estimate the elastic scattering cross xeftion off an ejectgog in nht thermal bath to be of the order of $$\lanjle \sigma v_{rel} \tangle \sim  \alpha^{\prime 2}
    \fraf{E T_R(\phi )}{m_{\tilde e_R}^4},$$ where $E$ is the wnergy of thd LSP, yielding the intgraction rate $\Gamma$ versus the ebpansnon rate $H$ $$\drqc{\Gwkma}{H} \sim \al'ha^{\priie 2}
    \frac{E T_R(\phi )^2 K}{m_{\tilde e_R}^4} \sim
    10^4 \lent( \frec{E}{10^2 {\em GeV}} \right).$$ This impnies that by a seryes of scdtcering, the LSPs, which wwre etergatic qhev pdovucsd, losf tieir momentz substantiqlly and they will bo np the non-relztiviseis energy region. Once entering in the not-remativistic region, howevwr, their momentum losd is at mjst about the background temperature at one collivion ena tkcn do boh likely reach their kinetic equilibrium. Therqrote we expect[If tme LSP is in kinetoc eaoilibrium, the xveragz $\lzngle v^2\rangle$ is ov order $T_R(\phu )/m_{LSP} \sii 10^{-4}$.]{} $$\ftac{T_R(\phi )}{m_{LSP}} \ll \langle v^2 \rqngle \ll 1.$$ Evvn wuth our ignorance lf the precnse vakue og $\langle v^2 \rangle$, we cau see fhat the anjihilatioh cross section ir npt large enough. Indeed, takind $m_{\tilde o_R} = k_{LSP} \sio 10^2$ GgV, Eq. (\[bagn1\]) leads $$\lwngle \sigma_{ann} v_{rel} \rangpe =
    \[i \alpha^{\prlme 2} \frac{1}{m_{LSP}^2} \langle v^2\rangle
    \sim 3  \langle f^2 \sancle \timef 10^{-8} {\rm GeV^{-2}},$$ which is smaller than jhe requifite xnnihilatikn crosv section (\[rqquired-cross-saftion\]) even fmr $\langlq v^2
right-handed slepton and $\langle v^2 \rangle$ represents of squared velocity the LSP, which close of the scattering the LSP off thermal radiations. For the case of m_{LSP}$, we estimate the elastic scattering cross section off an electron in the bath to be of the order of $$\langle \sigma v_{rel} \rangle \sim \alpha^{\prime \frac{E )}{m_{\tilde where is the energy of the LSP, yielding the interaction rate $\Gamma$ versus the expansion rate $H$ \sim \alpha^{\prime 2} \frac{E T_R(\phi )^2 M}{m_{\tilde e_R}^4} 10^4 \left( \frac{E}{10^2 {\rm \right).$$ This implies that by series scattering, the which energetic produced, lose their substantially and they will go to the non-relativistic energy region. Once entering in the non-relativistic region, however, momentum loss most about background at collision and they likely reach their kinetic equilibrium. Therefore LSP is in kinetic equilibrium, the average $\langle is of $T_R(\phi )/m_{LSP} \sim 10^{-4}$.]{} $$\frac{T_R(\phi )}{m_{LSP}} \langle v^2 \rangle \ll 1.$$ Even with our of the precise value of $\langle v^2 \rangle$, we can see that the annihilation cross not large enough. Indeed, $m_{\tilde l_R} = \sim GeV, (\[bann1\]) $$\langle \sigma_{ann} \rangle = \pi \alpha^{\prime 2} \frac{1}{m_{LSP}^2} \langle v^2\rangle \sim 3 \langle \rangle \times 10^{-8} {\rm GeV^{-2}},$$ which is smaller than the cross (\[required-cross-section\]) even for v^2
 right-handed slepton and $\langLe v^2 \rangle$ rEpresEntS thE aVeraGe of The squared veloCIty oF the LSP, which could be detErminEd BY a clOSe InspeCtion of THe SCAttErInG of ThE lSp off tHe tHermal rAdiations. FOr tHe Case of $E\gg m_{LSp}$, We Estimate thE elAstic scatterIng Cross sEcTioN Off an EleCtron In the tHErmal bAth to be of ThE Order oF $$\Langle \sIGMa V_{rel} \Rangle \sim  \alpha^{\priME 2}
    \fRAc{E T_R(\phi )}{m_{\tilde E_R}^4},$$ wherE $E$ IS tHE EneRgy Of the LSP, yiElDing tHE interaCTiON RAte $\gAmma$ versus the Expansion raTE $H$ $$\fRac{\GamMa}{h} \siM \Alpha^{\pRime 2}
    \fRaC{e T_R(\Phi )^2 M}{m_{\tilde e_r}^4} \sim
    10^4 \Left( \frac{E}{10^2 {\Rm GeV}} \rIGht).$$ This IMplies tHat by a SerIes Of scATtErIng, ThE lSPS, WhIch WEre EnergetiC wHeN prodUced, LOSE TheiR moMentA subsTantially and tHey Will GO to The noN-relaTiviStIc eneRgy regIon. OnCe Entering in the noN-relAtivistic RegIoN, hoWeVer, thEIr momeNtuM loSs is at mOst abouT The BaCKGRoUnd temperature at onE cOLLiSion and tHey do nOT lIkELy reach tHeIr kInetIC EquilIbriUM. THerefore We expeCT[IF tHe LSP is In KinetiC eQuiLibRium, tHE aveRage $\laNgle v^2\ranGle$ is OF order $T_R(\phi )/m_{LSp} \Sim 10^{-4}$.]{} $$\frac{T_R(\phi )}{m_{lsP}} \LL \LaNGle v^2 \RanGle \ll 1.$$ Even wiTh ouR IgnoRancE Of The PRecisE valuE oF $\LaNGle v^2 \rangle$, we can see tHaT the anNihilAtion cross secTion is not lARGE enough. INdeeD, TaKIng $m_{\tilde l_R} = m_{LSp} \sim 10^2$ GEV, Eq. (\[bann1\]) leADs $$\langle \Sigma_{Ann} v_{rel} \rAngle =
    \pi \alPHA^{\prime 2} \frAc{1}{m_{lSP}^2} \LanGle V^2\RAnGle
    \sim 3  \langle v^2 \RANgle \TiMes 10^{-8} {\rm Gev^{-2}},$$ whIch is smAllEr tHan The ReQuisite anNihilatiOn CrOsS sEctIon (\[reQUired-croSs-SecTiOn\]) eVen foR $\Langle V^2
 right-handed slepton and$\langle v ^2 \r ang le$  r epre sent s the averageo f th e squared velocity ofthe L SP ,  whi c hcould  be det e rm i n edby  a  cl os e  i nspec tio n of th e scatteri ngof  the LSP off th e thermalrad iations. For  th e case  o f $ E \gg m _{L SP}$,  we es t imatethe elast ic scatte r ing cro s s  s ecti on off an electro n  i n  the thermal b ath to  b e  o f the  or der of $$\ la ngle\ sigma v _ {r e l }  \r a ngle \sim  \a lpha^{\prim e  2} 
    \ fr ac{ E  T_R(\ phi ) }{ m _{\ tilde e_R}^ 4},$ $ where $ E$ ist he ener g y of th e LSP,  yi eld ingt he  i nte ra c tio n  r ate $\G amma$ ve rs us  theexpa n s i o n ra te$H$$$\fr ac{\Gamma}{H}  \s im \ a lph a^{\p rime2}
  \fra c{E T_ R(\ph i)^2 M}{m_{\tild e e_ R}^4} \si m
  10 ^4  \lef t ( \fra c{E }{1 0^2 {\r m GeV}} \ri gh t ) . $$  This implies that  b y aseries o f scat t er in g , the LS Ps , w hich w ere e nerg e ti c when p roduce d ,lo se thei rmoment asub sta ntial l y an d they  will go  to t h e non-relativi s tic energy re g io n .  O n ce e nte ring in the  non - rela tivi s ti c r e gion,  howe ve r ,t heir momentum lossis  at mo st ab out the backg round temp e r a ture atonec ol l ision and they  do n ot likelyr each the ir ki netic eq uilibrium . Therefor e w e e xpe ct[ I f  t he LSP is ink i neti cequilib riu m, theave rag e $ \la ng le v^2\ra ngle$ is  o for de r $ T_R(\ p hi )/m_{ LS P}\s im10^{- 4 }$.]{}  $$\f rac{ T_ R( \ phi  )}{m_{ L SP } }  \ll  \ la ngle  v^ 2\rang le \ l l 1 .$$ Eve n with ou r i g nora nc eof theprecise value  o f $\langle  v ^2\rangl e $ , we can  see that the annihilat i on cros s s ectio n is  not larg e e nough.  In d eed, t aking$m_{\ ti lde l _R} = m _{ LSP }\sim 10^2$ G eV,  Eq.(\ [ban n1\]) l eads $$\langle \si g ma_ {ann} v_{rel}  \r angl e =  \p i  \a lp h a^{ \ p rime 2} \frac{1 }{m_{LSP}^ 2} \l angle v^2\ r ang le 
    \s im 3  \ langl e  v^2 \r angle \ti mes 10^{- 8}  {\r m GeV ^{-2}},$$which is  smallert han t h erequi sit e anni hi lat ion c ross s e cti on (\ [requi re d-cros s-sec ti on\]) ev en for $\langle v^2
 right-handed_slepton and_$\langle v^2 \rangle$ represents_the average_of_the squared_velocity_of the LSP,_which could be_determined by a close_inspection of the_scattering_of the LSP off the thermal radiations. For the case of $E\gg m_{LSP}$, we_estimate_the elastic_scattering_cross_section off an electron in_the thermal bath to be_of the_order of $$\langle \sigma v_{rel} \rangle \sim _\alpha^{\prime_2}
  _ \frac{E T_R(\phi )}{m_{\tilde e_R}^4},$$ where $E$ is the_energy of the LSP, yielding the_interaction rate $\Gamma$_versus_the_expansion rate $H$ $$\frac{\Gamma}{H}_\sim \alpha^{\prime 2}
   _\frac{E T_R(\phi )^2 M}{m_{\tilde e_R}^4} \sim
_   10^4 \left( \frac{E}{10^2 {\rm_GeV}} \right).$$ This implies that by_a series of scattering, the_LSPs, which_were energetic when produced, lose_their momenta substantially_and they_will go to_the non-relativistic energy region. Once entering_in the non-relativistic_region, however, their momentum loss is_at_most about the_background_temperature_at one_collision and they_do_not likely_reach_their kinetic equilibrium. Therefore we expect[If_the_LSP is in kinetic equilibrium, the average_$\langle v^2\rangle$ is of_order_$T_R(\phi )/m_{LSP} \sim 10^{-4}$.]{}_$$\frac{T_R(\phi )}{m_{LSP}} \ll \langle v^2_\rangle \ll 1.$$ Even with our_ignorance of_the precise_value of $\langle v^2 \rangle$, we can see that the annihilation_cross section is not large enough._Indeed, taking $m_{\tilde l_R}_= m_{LSP}_\sim_10^2$ GeV, Eq. (\[bann1\])_leads_$$\langle \sigma_{ann}_v_{rel} \rangle =
    \pi_\alpha^{\prime 2}_\frac{1}{m_{LSP}^2} \langle v^2\rangle
   _\sim 3  \langle_v^2_\rangle \times 10^{-8} {\rm GeV^{-2}},$$ which_is smaller than the requisite annihilation_cross section (\[required-cross-section\]) even for_$\langle_v^2