, the simplest picture is that most FRIIs with linear sizes $\ga 10$ kpc are similar to our detected sources and so are underpressured.

Cosmology
---------

Our choice of cosmology does not significantly affect the relationship between radio and thermal pressures. If the Hubble parameter is $50h$ km s$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-1}$, then the minimum pressure in the radio lobes goes approximately as $h^{4\over 7}$ (equation \[mine\]), while the thermal pressure goes as $h^{1\over 2}$ for a detected X-ray environment whose angular scale we know; no sensible change in $h$ can eliminate the pressure differences. For upper limits, we have chosen a fixed linear size, and so it might seem that the estimated upper limit on thermal pressure is independent of $h$. However, since the linear size we choose is taken from observations on the assumption of $h=1$, the upper limits on thermal pressure go as $h^{1/2}$ in this case too.

Effects of projection {#projection}
---------------------

Projection affects the ratio of radio to thermal pressure according to the approximate relation $${p_{\rm th}\over{p_{\rm r}}} = {\cal K}\left({p'_{\rm th}\over{p'_{\rm
r}}}\right) = (\sin \theta)^{-4/7} \left({1 +
R^2}\over{1 + R^2/\sin^2 \theta}\right )^{3\beta/2} \left({p'_{\rm th}\over{p'_{\rm
r}}}\right)
$$ where $p'_{\rm th}$ and $p'_{\rm r}$ are the originally inferred thermal and radio pressures, $\theta$ is the angle of the radio structure to the line of sight and $R$ is the ratio between the apparent (projected) distance along the radio galaxy and the core radius of the cluster (Birkinshaw & Worrall 1993). Depending on the values of $R$ and $\theta$, projection can either decrease or increase the pressure ratio. Fig. \[ratiocont\] shows contours of values of this relation as a function of $R$ and $\theta$. It will be seen that for small $R$ the assumption of no projection causes us to [*underestimate*]{} the ratio of thermal to minimum pressure (${\cal
K} > 1$). This may be important, for example
, the simplest picture is that most FRIIs with linear sizes $ \ga 10 $ kpc are exchangeable to our detect sources and so are underpressured. 

 Cosmology 
 --------- 

 Our option of cosmology does not significantly feign the relationship between radio and thermal pressure. If the Hubble parameter is $ 50h$ km s$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-1}$, then the minimal atmospheric pressure in the radio lobe goes approximately as $ h^{4\over 7}$ (equation \[mine\ ]), while the thermal imperativeness go as $ h^{1\over 2}$ for a detected X - ray environment whose angular scale we know; no sensible variety in $ h$ can eliminate the pressure differences. For upper terminus ad quem, we have chosen a fixed analogue size, and so it might appear that the estimated upper terminus ad quem on thermal pressure is independent of $ h$. However, since the linear size we choose is taken from observation on the assumption of $ h=1 $, the upper limits on thermal pressure go as $ h^{1/2}$ in this case excessively. 

 Effects of projection { # projection } 
 --------------------- 

 Projection affects the ratio of radio to thermal pressure according to the approximate relation $ $ { p_{\rm th}\over{p_{\rm r } } } = { \cal K}\left({p'_{\rm th}\over{p'_{\rm 
 r}}}\right) = (\sin \theta)^{-4/7 } \left({1 + 
 R^2}\over{1 + R^2/\sin^2 \theta}\right) ^{3\beta/2 } \left({p'_{\rm th}\over{p'_{\rm 
 r}}}\right) 
 $ $ where $ p'_{\rm th}$ and $ p'_{\rm r}$ are the originally deduce thermal and radio pressures, $ \theta$ is the slant of the radio receiver structure to the line of sight and $ R$ is the ratio between the apparent (plan) distance along the radio galaxy and the core radius of the bunch (Birkinshaw & Worrall 1993). Depending on the values of $ R$ and $ \theta$, projection can either decrease or increase the pressure ratio. Fig.   \[ratiocont\ ] shows contours of values of this relation as a function of $ R$ and $ \theta$. It will be seen that for small $ R$ the premise of no projection cause us to [ * underestimate * ] { } the ratio of thermal to minimum pressure ($ { \cal 
 K } > 1 $). This may be important, for example
, thf simplest picture is thxt most FRIIs wnrh linxar sizss $\ga 10$ koc are similar to our detectxd siurcew and so are underpresrured.

Cosmllogy
---------

Our chomce of cosmology does nob sighlficautoy affect the telationship between radio avd thermal pressures. If the Hubble pawameter id $50h$ km s$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-1}$, tren uhe minjmum pressure in the radio lobes gkes appgoximately as $h^{4\ovrr 7}$ (equation \[mine\]), while thf thfrmal pressure goed as $h^{1\over 2}$ for q detected X-fay environment whose zngular scale we know; no sensibue chcnge in $h$ cqn ellkinate the 'ressuge differences. For up[er limots, we have chpsei a dixed linear size, and so it might seem jhat the evtnmated upper limit on tyerman prassufw ir ihdxpehdent lf $i$. However, sjnce the libear size we choose if taken from ogservaeijns on the assumption of $h=1$, the upper likita on thermal pressure gi as $h^{1/2}$ in this case tlo.

Effects of projection {#projection}
---------------------

Projection affects the rdtio kw rceio tu tjermal pressure according to the approximate wslstpon $${p_{\rm th}\over{p_{\rm r}}} = {\cal K}\legt({o'_{\rk th}\over{p'_{\rm
r}}}\rieht) = (\snh \fheta)^{-4/7} \left({1 +
R^2}\over{1 + G^2/\sin^2 \thgta}\rigyt )^{3\beta/2} \ltft({p'_{\rk th}\over{p'_{\rm
r}}}\right)
$$ where $p'_{\rm th}$ and $p'_{\rm g}$ arw the originally iuferred theroal snd rsdio pressures, $\theta$ is the angle of tje radio agructure to the uinv of sight and $R$ is the ratio fetween tie ap'arent (pfojevted) dystance allng tma radio galaxy and the eore sadius of hhe cluster (Birkinshaw & Worrall 1993). Depending on tve nalues of $R$ anc $\theta$, projestion can eithgr decreafe or increase nhe pressnre ratio. Fid. \[ratiocont\] shmas contours mf valuef of thiw relatkun as a functipn of $R$ aub $\theta$. Ir will be seen thab for amall $R$ the assboktuon of no projrctkon cwuxef us to [*underastioatd*]{} the fatio of thcrmxl tp minimum pressure (${\cdl
K} > 1$). This may be impottwnt, for gxample
, the simplest picture is that most linear $\ga 10$ are similar to are Cosmology --------- Our of cosmology does significantly affect the relationship between radio thermal pressures. If the Hubble parameter is $50h$ km s$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-1}$, then the pressure in the radio lobes goes approximately as $h^{4\over 7}$ (equation \[mine\]), while thermal goes $h^{1\over for a detected X-ray environment whose angular scale we know; no sensible change in $h$ can the pressure differences. For upper limits, we have a fixed linear size, so it might seem that estimated limit on pressure independent $h$. However, since linear size we choose is taken from observations on the assumption of $h=1$, the upper limits on pressure go in this too. of {#projection} --------------------- Projection ratio of radio to thermal pressure approximate relation $${p_{\rm th}\over{p_{\rm r}}} = {\cal K}\left({p'_{\rm r}}}\right) = \theta)^{-4/7} \left({1 + R^2}\over{1 + R^2/\sin^2 )^{3\beta/2} \left({p'_{\rm th}\over{p'_{\rm r}}}\right) $$ where $p'_{\rm th}$ $p'_{\rm r}$ are the originally inferred thermal and radio pressures, $\theta$ is the angle of structure to the line sight and $R$ the between apparent distance along radio galaxy and the core radius of the cluster (Birkinshaw & 1993). Depending on the values of $R$ and $\theta$, projection decrease increase the pressure Fig. \[ratiocont\] shows contours values this relation as a $R$ $\theta$. seen for $R$ the assumption of projection causes us to [*underestimate*]{} ratio of thermal to 1$). This may be important, for example
, the simplest picture is that mOst FRIIs wiTh linEar SizEs $\Ga 10$ kpC are Similar to our deTEcteD sources and so are underpRessuReD.

cosmOLoGy
---------

Our Choice oF CoSMOloGy DoEs nOt SIgNificAntLy affecT the relatiOnsHiP between radiO AnD thermal prEssUres. If the HubBle ParameTeR is $50H$ Km s$^{-1}$ MpC$^{-1}$, thEn the MinimuM PressuRe in the raDiO Lobes gOEs approXIMaTely As $h^{4\over 7}$ (equation \[miNE\]), wHIle the thermal pRessurE gOEs AS $H^{1\ovEr 2}$ fOr a detecteD X-Ray enVIronmenT WhOSE AngULar scale we knoW; no sensible CHanGe in $h$ cAn EliMInate tHe preSsURe dIfferences. FOr upPer limits, We have CHosen a fIXed lineAr size, And So iT migHT sEeM thAt THe eSTiMatED upPer limit On ThErmal PresSURE Is inDepEndeNt of $h$. however, since tHe lIneaR SizE we chOose iS takEn From oBservaTions On The assumption of $H=1$, the Upper limiTs oN tHerMaL presSUre go aS $h^{1/2}$ iN thIs case tOo.

EffecTS of PrOJECtIon {#projection}
---------------------

ProjeCtION aFfects thE ratio OF rAdIO to thermAl PreSsurE ACcordIng tO ThE approxiMate reLAtIoN $${p_{\rm th}\oVeR{p_{\rm r}}} = {\cAl k}\leFt({p'_{\Rm th}\oVEr{p'_{\rM
r}}}\righT) = (\sin \thetA)^{-4/7} \left({1 +
r^2}\Over{1 + R^2/\sin^2 \theta}\rIGht )^{3\beta/2} \left({p'_{\rM Th}\OVEr{P'_{\Rm
r}}}\rIghT)
$$ where $p'_{\rm th}$ And $p'_{\RM r}$ arE the ORiGinALly inFerreD tHErMAl and radio pressures, $\ThEta$ is tHe angLe of the radio sTructure to THE Line of siGht aND $R$ IS the ratio betweEn the Apparent (prOJected) diStancE along thE radio galAXY and the cOre RadIus Of tHE ClUster (BirkinshAW & worrAlL 1993). DependIng On the vaLueS of $r$ anD $\thEtA$, projectiOn can eitHeR dEcReAse Or incREase the pReSsuRe RatIo. Fig. \[RAtiocoNt\] shoWs coNtOuRS of Values oF ThIS RelaTiOn As a fUncTiOn of $R$ And $\tHEta$. it will bE seen that For SMall $r$ tHe AssumptIon of no projecTiOn causes us To [*UndErestiMATe*]{} the ratIo of thermal to minimum preSSure (${\cal
k} > 1$). ThIs may Be imPortant, foR exAmple
, the simplest picture isthat mostFRIIs  wi thli near  siz es $\ga 10$ kp c  are  similar to our detect ed so ur c es a n dso ar e under p re s s ure d. 
Cos mo l og y
--- --- ---

Ou r choice o f c os mology doesn ot  significa ntl y affect the  re lation sh ipb etwee n r adioand th e rmal p ressures.  I f  the H u bble pa r a me teris $50h$ km s$^{- 1 }$ Mpc$^{-1}$, th en the  m i ni m u m p res sure in th eradio lobes g o es a p pro x imately as $h ^{4\over 7} $  (e quatio n\[m i ne\]),  whil et hethermal pre ssur e goes as  $h^{1 \ over 2} $  for adetect edX-r ay e n vi ro nme nt who s eang u lar  scale w ekn ow; n o se n s i b le c han ge i n $h$  can eliminat e t he p r ess ure d iffer ence s.  Forupperlimit s,  we have chosen  a f ixed line arsi ze,  a nd so it mig htsee m thatthe est i mat ed u p pe r limit on thermal  p r e ss ure is i ndepen d en to f $h$. H ow eve r, s i n ce th e li n ea r size w e choo s eis  takenfr om obs er vat ion s ont he a ssumpt ion of $ h=1$, the upper limi t s on thermalp re s s ur e  goas$h^{1/2}$ i n th i s ca se t o o. 

E f fects  of p ro j ec t ion {#projection}
- -- ------ ----- -------

Proj ection aff e c t s the ra tioo fr adio to therma l pre ssure acco r ding tothe a pproxima te relati o n  $${p_{\ rmth} \ov er{ p _ {\ rm r}}} = {\c a l  K}\ le ft({p'_ {\r m th}\o ver {p' _{\ rmr} }}\right)  = (\sin  \ th et a) ^{- 4/7}\ left({1+R^2 }\ ove r{1 + R^2/\s in^2\the ta }\ r igh t )^{3\ b et a / 2} \ le ft ({p' _{\ rm  th}\ over { p'_ {\rm
r} }}\right) 
$$ wher e$p '_{\rmth}$ and $p'_ {\ rm r}$ are  t heorigin a l ly infer red thermal and radio p r essures , $ \thet a$ i s the ang leof the  ra d io str ucture  to t he  li n e  of s i g ht  an d$R$ is the r ati o bet we en t he appa rent (projected) d i sta nce along the  ra diog a la xya nd the  c o rer a dius of the clu ster (Birk in s ha w & Worral l  19 93 ). Depe nding o n the valuesof $R$ an d $\theta $,  pro j e cti on can eit her decr ease or i n creas e  t he pr ess ure ra ti o.Fig.\[rati o con t\] s hows c on toursof va lu es of th is relation as a functi on of$R$ a nd$\theta$.  It wil l be seen  tha t for smal l $ R$the a ssu m ption  ofn opro j ectio n ca u ses us to [* und e r es timate*]{}t h e  ra tio o f t h ermalto m inimum pressure ( $ {\cal
K} > 1$) . Th i s  ma y b e  imp or tant, for exam ple 
, the_simplest picture_is that most FRIIs_with linear_sizes_$\ga 10$_kpc_are similar to_our detected sources_and so are underpressured.

Cosmology
---------

Our_choice of cosmology_does_not significantly affect the relationship between radio and thermal pressures. If the Hubble parameter_is_$50h$ km_s$^{-1}$_Mpc$^{-1}$,_then the minimum pressure in_the radio lobes goes approximately_as $h^{4\over_7}$ (equation \[mine\]), while the thermal pressure goes_as_$h^{1\over 2}$ for_a detected X-ray environment whose angular scale we know;_no sensible change in $h$ can_eliminate the pressure_differences._For_upper limits, we have_chosen a fixed linear size, and_so it might seem that the_estimated upper limit on thermal pressure is_independent of $h$. However, since the_linear size we choose is_taken from_observations on the assumption of_$h=1$, the upper_limits on_thermal pressure go_as $h^{1/2}$ in this case too.

Effects_of projection {#projection}
---------------------

Projection_affects the ratio of radio to_thermal_pressure according to_the_approximate_relation $${p_{\rm_th}\over{p_{\rm r}}} =_{\cal_K}\left({p'_{\rm th}\over{p'_{\rm
r}}}\right)_=_(\sin \theta)^{-4/7} \left({1 +
R^2}\over{1 + R^2/\sin^2_\theta}\right_)^{3\beta/2} \left({p'_{\rm th}\over{p'_{\rm
r}}}\right)
$$ where $p'_{\rm th}$ and_$p'_{\rm r}$ are the_originally_inferred thermal and radio_pressures, $\theta$ is the angle_of the radio structure to the_line of_sight and_$R$ is the ratio between the apparent (projected) distance along the_radio galaxy and the core radius_of the cluster (Birkinshaw_& Worrall_1993)._Depending on the_values_of $R$_and $\theta$, projection can either decrease or_increase the_pressure ratio. Fig. \[ratiocont\] shows contours of_values of this relation_as_a function of $R$ and $\theta$._It will be seen that for_small $R$ the assumption of_no_projection_causes us to [*underestimate*]{} the_ratio of thermal to minimum pressure_(${\cal
K} > 1$)._This may be important, for example