 well as enjoy a conserved energy, that is, \[funcional\] f&&\~\_[a=0]{} 0(a\^[-u]{})\
f&&\~\_[a=|[a]{}]{}(|[a]{}-a)\^v with $0<u<1$ and $v>\frac{1}{2}$.

If we want moreover the now well defined energy to be finite it is clearly necessary (owing to the $a^{\prime}$ factor in the denominator) that when $r\rightarrow \infty$ \[mu\] T\~e\^[- \^2 r]{} with \[finita\] \^2 &gt; which is much faster that required by (\[funcional\]).We can define another functional space in which energy is not only conserved, but also finite, and this space is essentially characterized by the behavior (\[finita\]).

It is then plain that in the conserved-energy functional space defined by (\[funcional\]) there are fluctuations with arbitarily large negative energy, namely all those that at infinity behave as (\[mu\]) with $|\mu|< |m|$. In the more restrictive finite-energy space (\[finita\]), this behavior still persists as long as $d>1$. This is the same bound found for the linear dilaton background.

The tachyon equation
--------------------

Let us now examine the space of solutions of the linearized equation of motion and check whether on shell there are elements of our functional space of well-defined fluctuations.

We shall write the wave equations (following the conventions of [@polchinski]) as: \[wave\] \^2 T - 2 \^A \_A T - m\^2 T = 0 For the Poincaré invariant ansatz the dilaton is given by =log a’ + log a where $a'\equiv\frac{da}{dr}$.

Variables can be separated in the wave equation (\[wave\]) by means of: T(x\^A) T(a)(x\^) with the result: \[eqa\] \_d && =\
T” + T’&&= ()T

(where we have used $\frac{dT}{dr} = \frac{dT}{da}a'\equiv T' a'$), and $\lambda$ is the separation constant.

Now, for a plane wave $\Theta = e^{i kx}\equiv 
e^{-i(\omega t - \vec{k}\vec{x})}$, the first (Minkowskian
well as enjoy a conserved energy, that is, \[funcional\ ] f&&\~\_[a=0 ] { } 0(a\^[-u]{})\ 
 f&&\~\_[a=|[a]{}]{}(|[a]{}-a)\^v with $ 0 < u<1 $ and $ v>\frac{1}{2}$. 

 If we want furthermore the nowadays well defined energy to be finite it is intelligibly necessary (owe to the $ a^{\prime}$ factor in the denominator) that when $ r\rightarrow \infty$ \[mu\ ] T\~e\^[- \^2 r ] { } with \[finita\ ] \^2 & gt; which is a lot faster that required by (\[funcional\]).We can define another running quad in which energy is not entirely conserved, but also finite, and this distance is basically characterized by the behavior (\[finita\ ]). 

 It is then apparent that in the conserved - energy running space defined by (\[funcional\ ]) there are variation with arbitarily large negative department of energy, namely all those that at infinity act as (\[mu\ ]) with $ |\mu| < |m|$. In the more restrictive finite - energy space (\[finita\ ]), this behavior still persists as long as $ d>1$. This is the like bound found for the linear dilaton background. 

 The tachyon equation 
 -------------------- 

 Let us nowadays examine the space of solutions of the linearized equation of motion and check whether on shell there are elements of our running outer space of well - defined fluctuation. 

 We shall write the wave equations (following the conventions of [ @polchinski ]) as: \[wave\ ] \^2 T - 2 \^A \_A T - m\^2 deoxythymidine monophosphate = 0 For the Poincaré changeless ansatz the dilaton is given by = log a ’ + log a where $ a'\equiv\frac{da}{dr}$. 

 Variables can be separated in the wave equation (\[wave\ ]) by mean of: T(x\^A) T(a)(x\^) with the result: \[eqa\ ] \_d & & = \ 
 T ” + T’&&= () T 

 (where we have used $ \frac{dT}{dr } = \frac{dT}{da}a'\equiv T' a'$), and $ \lambda$ is the separation constant. 

 Now, for a plane wave $ \Theta = e^{i kx}\equiv 
 e^{-i(\omega metric ton - \vec{k}\vec{x})}$, the first (Minkowskian
 wepl as enjoy a conserved tnergy, that is, \[fuuxional\] f&&\~\_[a=0]{} 0(a\^[-u]{})\
r&&\~\_[a=|[a]{}]{}(|[a]{}-a)\^v wkth $0<u<1$ and $v>\frac{1}{2}$.

If we want moceovwr tht now well defined dnergy to be finire iu is clearly necessary (owlug to bhe $a^{\'rmme}$ factor in tme denominador) that when $s\rkgktarrow \infty$ \[mu\] T\~e\^[- \^2 r]{} with \[finita\] \^2 &dt; whicn ls much faster thau rqquidvd by (\[funcional\]).We can define ankther flnctional space im which energy is not only conderved, but also fijite, and thus s[qce is essengially chagccterized bi the behavior (\[finita\]).

It is then olain that in tye cojverved-energb funcnional space defined ty (\[funcoonal\]) there arc flurtuarions with arbitarily large negative engrgy, namelf cll those that at infunuty bghave as (\[oy\]) wkth $|\mn|< |m|$. In thf mkre restridtive finitw-energy space (\[finits\]), eyis behavior atill [ewsists as long as $d>1$. This is the same bolnd round for the linear dioaton background.

The twchyon eqtation
--------------------

Let us now examine the space of solutions ox the uintavlzed wqkation of motion and check whether on shell trsrt age elements of ouv functional space ov egll-defined fluztuations.

Se shall write the wave ezuatiins (folloring the conventions of [@polchinwki]) as: \[wave\] \^2 R - 2 \^A \_A T - m\^2 T = 0 Flr the Poinearé infariamt ansatz the dilaton ir giben by =log w’ + log a sfere $a'\equiv\frac{dx}{dr}$.

Naridbles can be separated in ehe wave xquatnon (\[wave\]) by keans jf: T(x\^A) T(a)(x\^) with the result: \[eqa\] \_d && =\
H” + T’&&= ()J

(where we have uded $\frac{dT}{dr} = \frac{dT}{da}a'\equiv T' e'$), and $\lambda$ os thv separatnon cokstant.

Now, for a plane wave $\Thgta = e^{i kr}\equiv 
e^{-i(\omega t - \vec{k}\vxc{x})}$, the firse (Minkowskian
well as enjoy a conserved energy, that f&&\~\_[a=0]{} f&&\~\_[a=|[a]{}]{}(|[a]{}-a)\^v with and $v>\frac{1}{2}$. If well energy to be it is clearly (owing to the $a^{\prime}$ factor in denominator) that when $r\rightarrow \infty$ \[mu\] T\~e\^[- \^2 r]{} with \[finita\] \^2 &gt; is much faster that required by (\[funcional\]).We can define another functional space in energy not conserved, also finite, and this space is essentially characterized by the behavior (\[finita\]). It is then plain in the conserved-energy functional space defined by (\[funcional\]) are fluctuations with arbitarily negative energy, namely all those at behave as with |m|$. the more restrictive space (\[finita\]), this behavior still persists as long as $d>1$. This is the same bound found for linear dilaton tachyon equation Let now the space of the linearized equation of motion and shell there are elements of our functional space well-defined fluctuations. shall write the wave equations (following conventions of [@polchinski]) as: \[wave\] \^2 T - \^A \_A T - m\^2 T = 0 For the Poincaré invariant ansatz the dilaton by =log a’ + a where $a'\equiv\frac{da}{dr}$. can separated the equation (\[wave\]) means of: T(x\^A) T(a)(x\^) with the result: \[eqa\] \_d && =\ + T’&&= ()T (where we have used $\frac{dT}{dr} = \frac{dT}{da}a'\equiv and is the separation Now, for a plane $\Theta e^{i kx}\equiv e^{-i(\omega t the (Minkowskian
 well as enjoy a conserved enerGy, that is, \[fuNcionAl\] f&&\~\_[A=0]{} 0(a\^[-u]{})\
F&&\~\_[a=|[A]{}]{}(|[a]{}-a)\^v With $0<U<1$ and $v>\frac{1}{2}$.

If we wANt moReover the now well defineD enerGy TO be fINiTe it iS clearlY NeCESsaRy (OwIng To THe $A^{\primE}$ faCtor in tHe denominaTor) ThAt when $r\rightARrOw \infty$ \[mu\] T\~E\^[- \^2 r]{} wIth \[finita\] \^2 &gt; wHicH is mucH fAstER that ReqUired By (\[funcIOnal\]).We Can define AnOTher fuNCtional SPAcE in wHich energy is not onLY cONserved, but also Finite, AnD ThIS SpaCe iS essentialLy CharaCTerized BY tHE BEhaVIor (\[finita\]).

It is Then plain thAT in The conSeRveD-Energy FunctIoNAl sPace defined By (\[fuNcional\]) thEre are FLuctuatIOns with ArbitaRilY laRge nEGaTiVe eNeRGy, nAMeLy aLL thOse that aT iNfInity BehaVE AS (\[Mu\]) wiTh $|\mU|< |m|$. In The moRe restrictive FinIte-eNErgY spacE (\[finiTa\]), thIs BehavIor stiLl perSiSts as long as $d>1$. ThiS is tHe same bouNd fOuNd fOr The liNEar dilAtoN baCkgrounD.

The tacHYon EqUATIoN
--------------------

Let us now examine thE sPACe Of solutiOns of tHE lInEArized eqUaTioN of mOTIon anD cheCK wHether on Shell tHErE aRe elemeNtS of our FuNctIonAl spaCE of wEll-defIned flucTuatiONs.

We shall write THe wave equatioNS (fOLLoWIng tHe cOnventions oF [@polCHinsKi]) as: \[WAvE\] \^2 T - 2 \^A \_a t - m\^2 T = 0 FoR the POiNCaRÉ invariant ansatz the DiLaton iS giveN by =log a’ + log a whEre $a'\equiv\fRAC{Da}{dr}$.

VariAbleS CaN Be separated in tHe wavE equation (\[wAVe\]) by meanS of: T(x\^a) T(a)(x\^) with The result: \[EQA\] \_d && =\
T” + T’&&= ()T

(wheRe wE haVe uSed $\FRAc{DT}{dr} = \frac{dT}{da}a'\EQUiv T' A'$), aNd $\lambdA$ is The sepaRatIon ConStaNt.

now, for a plAne wave $\THeTa = E^{i Kx}\EquIv 
e^{-i(\oMEga t - \vec{k}\VeC{x})}$, tHe FirSt (MinKOwskiaN
 well as enjoy a conserved  energy, t hat i s,\[f un cion al\]  f&&\~\_[a=0]{ }  0(a \^[-u]{})\
f&&\~\_[a=| [a]{} ]{ } (|[a ] {} -a)\^ v with$ 0< u < 1$an d$v> \f r ac {1}{2 }$. 

If we  want more ove rthe now well de fined ener gyto be finite  it  is cl ea rly neces sar y (ow ing to the $a ^{\prime} $f actori n the d e n om inat or) that when $r\ r ig h tarrow \infty$  \[mu\ ]T \~ e \ ^[-  \^ 2 r]{} wit h\[fin i ta\] \^ 2  & g t ;  wh i ch is much fa ster that r e qui red by  ( \[f u nciona l\]). We can  define ano ther  function al spa c e in wh i ch ener gy isnot  on ly c o ns er ved ,b uta ls o f i nit e, and t hi sspace  ise s s e ntia lly  cha racte rized by thebeh avio r  (\ [fini ta\]) .

I tis th en pla in th at  in the conserv ed-e nergy fun cti on alsp ace d e finedby(\[ funcion al\]) t h ere  a r e fl uctuations with ar bi t a ri ly large  negat i ve  e n ergy, na me lyallt h ose t hata tinfinity  behav e  a s(\[mu\] )with $ |\ mu| < | m|$.I n th e more  restric tivef inite-energy s p ace (\[finita \ ]) , th i s be hav ior still p ersi s ts a s lo n gas$ d>1$.  This  i s  t h e same bound foundfo r thelinea r dilaton bac kground.
T h e  tachyon  equ a ti o n
------------ ----- ---

Let u s  now exa minethe spac e of solu t i ons of t helin ear ize d eq uation of mot i o n an dcheck w het her onshe llthe rear e element s of our  f un ct io nal  spac e  of well -d efi ne d f luctu a tions. 

Weshal lwr i tethe wav e  e q u atio ns  ( foll owi ng  theconv e nti ons of[@polchin ski ] ) as :\[ wave\]\^2 T - 2 \^A  \ _A T - m\^ 2T =  0 For t he Poinc aré invariant ansatz th e  dilato n i s giv en b y =log a’  +log awhe r e $a'\ equiv\ frac{ da }{d r } $.

V a r ia ble scan be sep a r ate d inth e wa ve equa tion (\[wave\]) by mea ns of: T(x\^A ) T (a)( x \ ^)  wi t ht here s ult : \[eqa\] \_d &&=\
T” + T’ && =  ( )T

(where weha ve used  $\frac {dT}{ d r} = \f rac{dT}{d a}a'\equi vT' a ' $ ),and $\lamb da$ is t he separa t ion c o ns tant. 

N ow, fo ra p lanewave $ \ The ta =e^{i k x} \equiv  
e^{ -i (\omegat - \vec{k}\vec{x})}$,the fi rst ( Min kowskian
 well_as enjoy_a conserved energy, that_is, \[funcional\]_f&&\~\_[a=0]{}_0(a\^[-u]{})\
f&&\~\_[a=|[a]{}]{}(|[a]{}-a)\^v with_$0<u<1$_and $v>\frac{1}{2}$.

If we_want moreover the_now well defined energy_to be finite_it_is clearly necessary (owing to the $a^{\prime}$ factor in the denominator) that when $r\rightarrow_\infty$_\[mu\] T\~e\^[-_\^2_r]{}_with \[finita\] \^2 &gt; which_is much faster that required_by (\[funcional\]).We_can define another functional space in which energy_is_not only conserved,_but also finite, and this space is essentially characterized_by the behavior (\[finita\]).

It is then_plain that in_the_conserved-energy_functional space defined by_(\[funcional\]) there are fluctuations with arbitarily_large negative energy, namely all those_that at infinity behave as (\[mu\]) with_$|\mu|< |m|$. In the more restrictive_finite-energy space (\[finita\]), this behavior_still persists_as long as $d>1$. This_is the same_bound found_for the linear_dilaton background.

The tachyon equation
--------------------

Let us now_examine the space_of solutions of the linearized equation_of_motion and check_whether_on_shell there_are elements of_our_functional space_of_well-defined fluctuations.

We shall write the wave_equations_(following the conventions of [@polchinski]) as: \[wave\]_\^2 T - 2_\^A_\_A T - m\^2_T = 0 For the_Poincaré invariant ansatz the dilaton is_given by_=log a’_+ log a where $a'\equiv\frac{da}{dr}$.

Variables can be separated in the wave_equation (\[wave\]) by means of: T(x\^A)_T(a)(x\^) with the result:_\[eqa\] \_d_&&_=\
T” + T’&&=_()T

(where_we have_used $\frac{dT}{dr} = \frac{dT}{da}a'\equiv T' a'$), and_$\lambda$ is_the separation constant.

Now, for a plane_wave $\Theta = e^{i_kx}\equiv_
e^{-i(\omega t - \vec{k}\vec{x})}$, the first_(Minkowskian