frac{9(14-R^2)\log H}{100H^3R},
\label{eq:a1}$$ $$A_2=-\frac{9(4-R^2)\log H}{50H^4R}.
\label{eq:a2}$$

Substituting (\[eq:a2\]) into (\[eq:p1\]) estimates the asymptotic order of the perturbed pressure $$\varepsilon^{-3/2}\delta
\hat{P}^{(f)}=
\frac{12\varepsilon^{-3}{\rm Ca}
\log(R^2/2)}{25R^6}+O(R^{-6})
\ \ \ {\rm for}\ \ \ R\gg 1,$$ which is $O({\rm Ca}\log\varepsilon\ (\varepsilon^{1/2}R)^{-6})$ in the overlapping region $R\sim \varepsilon^{-1/2}$, and thus to be matched with the pressure of $O({\rm Ca}\log\varepsilon\ r^{-6})$ in the outer region ([@one1967]). This outer pressure may contribute to the lateral force of $O({\rm Ca}\log\varepsilon)$, which is larger than that for the wide-gap case, corresponding to $O({\rm Ca})$. Nevertheless, as discussed in [@urz2007], the rapid decay of the perturbed pressure for $R\gg 1$ indicates that the contribution of the outer pressure to the lateral force is negligibly smaller than that of the inner pressure. Therefore, to evaluate the leading-order migration force, one does not have to solve the outer problem. (In fact, the order of the lateral force (\[eq:fm\_lub\]) evaluated only in the inner region is confirmed to be $O({\rm Ca}\varepsilon^{-2})$ and larger than the outer contribution $O({\rm Ca}\log\varepsilon)$.) The leading pressure $\varepsilon^{-3/2}\hat{P}^{(0)}\cos\phi$ with no deformation is locally dominant but does not contribute to the lateral force due to its azimuthal cosine dependence. The viscous stress contribution to the lateral force is $O(\varepsilon)$ smaller than the pressure in the inner region. The deformation-induced lateral force $F_M$ to cancel the migration velocity and to maintain the wall-parallel motion is expressed as $$F_M\approx 
\oint_{\rm contact}\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!{\rm d}^2{\bm x}\ 
\varepsilon^{-3/2}\delta
frac{9(14 - R^2)\log H}{100H^3R }, 
 \label{eq: a1}$$ $ $ A_2=-\frac{9(4 - R^2)\log H}{50H^4R }. 
 \label{eq: a2}$$ 

 Substituting (\[eq: a2\ ]) into (\[eq: p1\ ]) estimates the asymptotic order of the perturbed pressure $ $ \varepsilon^{-3/2}\delta 
 \hat{P}^{(f)}= 
 \frac{12\varepsilon^{-3}{\rm Ca } 
 \log(R^2/2)}{25R^6}+O(R^{-6 }) 
 \ \ \ { \rm for}\ \ \ R\gg 1,$$ which is $ O({\rm Ca}\log\varepsilon\ (\varepsilon^{1/2}R)^{-6})$ in the overlap area $ R\sim \varepsilon^{-1/2}$, and thus to be matched with the atmospheric pressure of $ O({\rm Ca}\log\varepsilon\ r^{-6})$ in the extinct region ([ @one1967 ]). This outer press may contribute to the lateral force of $ O({\rm Ca}\log\varepsilon)$, which is bigger than that for the wide - gap character, corresponding to $ O({\rm Ca})$. Nevertheless, as hash out in [ @urz2007 ], the rapid decay of the perturb pressure for $ R\gg 1 $ indicates that the contribution of the outer pressure to the lateral force is negligibly modest than that of the inner pressure. Therefore, to measure the leading - order migration force out, one does not have to resolve the outer problem. (In fact, the order of the lateral force (\[eq: fm\_lub\ ]) evaluated merely in the inner region is confirmed to be $ O({\rm Ca}\varepsilon^{-2})$ and larger than the outer contribution $ O({\rm Ca}\log\varepsilon)$.) The leading pressure $ \varepsilon^{-3/2}\hat{P}^{(0)}\cos\phi$ with no deformation is locally dominant but does not contribute to the lateral force due to its azimuthal cosine dependence. The viscous stress contribution to the lateral force is $ O(\varepsilon)$ smaller than the pressure in the inside area. The deformation - induced lateral force $ F_M$ to delete the migration speed and to maintain the wall - parallel motion is expressed as $ $ F_M\approx 
 \oint_{\rm contact}\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!{\rm d}^2{\bm x}\ 
 \varepsilon^{-3/2}\delta
fraf{9(14-R^2)\log H}{100H^3R},
\label{eq:a1}$$ $$A_2=-\frac{9(4-R^2)\uog H}{50H^4R}.
\label{eq:a2}$$

Substitnting (\[es:a2\]) into (\[dq:p1\]) estimates the asymptotic oeder if the perturbed pressjre $$\varepdilon^{-3/2}\delra
\hau{P}^{(f)}=
\frac{12\varepsilon^{-3}{\cj Ca}
\log(V^2/2)}{25X^6}+O(R^{-6})
\ \ \ {\vm fox}\ \ \ R\gg 1,$$ which ix $O({\rm Ca}\loc\varepsilon\ (\vaseosnlon^{1/2}R)^{-6})$ in the overlapping region $R\sim \varepsolln^{-1/2}$, and thus to be kwtchsd with the pressure of $O({\rm Ca}\log\vzrepsilmn\ r^{-6})$ in the oiter region ([@one1967]). This outer predsure may contribuhe to the lqterwo force of $O({\fm Ca}\log\vagzpsilon)$, whidh is larger than that for the dide-gcp case, cortzwpojging to $O({\rm Ca})$. Nvvertheless, as discusved in [@irz2007], the rapid cecey od the perturbed pressnre for $R\gg 1$ indicatgs that tha eontribution of the oytwr prgssura to rhe lauerel rorce ls iegligibly amaller thab that of the inner pwvxsure. Therefkre, to edaluate the leading-order migration forct, one does not have to solve the outer problem. (In fact, the order of the lateral force (\[eq:fm\_lub\]) evaluated onlf in vhd iukcr rdtiln is confirmed to be $O({\rm Ca}\varepsilon^{-2})$ and lawfet nhan the outer coktribution $O({\rm Ca}\lpg\gatgpsilon)$.) The lexding 'deasure $\varepsilon^{-3/2}\hah{P}^{(0)}\cos\phy$ wity no defowmatoon is locally dominant but does not coutrubute to the latercl force due to ots aaimuthal cosine dependeuce. Ths viscous shress conffibution to the uatvral force is $O(\varepsilon)$ smaljer than vhe pxessure kn tne innqr region. Hhe dcxormation-induced lwterap xorce $F_M$ tl cancel the migration velocity and to maintaon thv wall-parcllel kotion is expwessed as $$F_M\apkrox 
\oint_{\xm congact}\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!{\rm d}^2{\bm x}\ 
\vare'silon^{-3/2}\delta
frac{9(14-R^2)\log H}{100H^3R}, \label{eq:a1}$$ $$A_2=-\frac{9(4-R^2)\log H}{50H^4R}. \label{eq:a2}$$ Substituting (\[eq:p1\]) the asymptotic of the perturbed \log(R^2/2)}{25R^6}+O(R^{-6}) \ \ {\rm \ \ R\gg which is $O({\rm Ca}\log\varepsilon\ (\varepsilon^{1/2}R)^{-6})$ in overlapping region $R\sim \varepsilon^{-1/2}$, and thus to be matched with the pressure of Ca}\log\varepsilon\ r^{-6})$ in the outer region ([@one1967]). This outer pressure may contribute to lateral of Ca}\log\varepsilon)$, is larger than that for the wide-gap case, corresponding to $O({\rm Ca})$. Nevertheless, as discussed in the rapid decay of the perturbed pressure for 1$ indicates that the of the outer pressure to lateral is negligibly than of inner pressure. Therefore, evaluate the leading-order migration force, one does not have to solve the outer problem. (In fact, the of the (\[eq:fm\_lub\]) evaluated in inner is confirmed to Ca}\varepsilon^{-2})$ and larger than the outer The leading pressure $\varepsilon^{-3/2}\hat{P}^{(0)}\cos\phi$ with no deformation is dominant but not contribute to the lateral force to its azimuthal cosine dependence. The viscous stress to the lateral force is $O(\varepsilon)$ smaller than the pressure in the inner region. The force $F_M$ to cancel migration velocity and maintain wall-parallel is as $$F_M\approx contact}\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!{\rm d}^2{\bm x}\ \varepsilon^{-3/2}\delta
frac{9(14-R^2)\log H}{100H^3R},
\label{eq:a1}$$ $$A_2=-\frac{9(4-R^2)\Log H}{50H^4R}.
\labeL{eq:a2}$$

SUbsTitUtIng (\[eQ:a2\]) inTo (\[eq:p1\]) estimates THe asYmptotic order of the pertUrbed PrESsurE $$\VaRepsiLon^{-3/2}\deltA
\HaT{p}^{(F)}=
\frAc{12\VaRepSiLOn^{-3}{\Rm Ca}
\lOg(R^2/2)}{25r^6}+O(R^{-6})
\ \ \ {\rm foR}\ \ \ R\gg 1,$$ which iS $O({\rM CA}\log\varepsilON\ (\vArepsilon^{1/2}R)^{-6})$ In tHe overlappinG reGion $R\sIm \VarEPsiloN^{-1/2}$, anD thus To be maTChed wiTh the presSuRE of $O({\rm cA}\log\varEPSiLon\ r^{-6})$ In the outer region ([@oNE1967]). THIs outer pressurE may coNtRIbUTE to The Lateral forCe Of $O({\rm cA}\log\varEPsILON)$, whICh is larger thaN that for the WIde-Gap casE, cOrrESpondiNg to $O({\Rm cA})$. NeVertheless, aS disCussed in [@uRz2007], the rAPid decaY Of the peRturbeD prEssUre fOR $R\Gg 1$ IndIcATes THaT thE ConTributioN oF tHe outEr prESSURe to The LateRal foRce is negligibLy sMallER thAn thaT of thE innEr PressUre. TheReforE, tO evaluate the leaDing-Order migrAtiOn ForCe, One doES not haVe tO soLve the oUter proBLem. (in FACT, tHe order of the lateraL fORCe (\[Eq:fm\_lub\]) eValuatED oNlY In the innEr RegIon iS COnfirMed tO Be $o({\rm Ca}\varEpsiloN^{-2})$ AnD lArger thAn The outEr ConTriButioN $o({\rm CA}\log\vaRepsilon)$.) the leADing pressure $\vaREpsilon^{-3/2}\hat{P}^{(0)}\coS\PhI$ WItH No deForMation is locAlly DOminAnt bUT dOes NOt conTribuTe TO tHE lateral force due to iTs AzimutHal coSine dependencE. The viscouS STRess contRibuTIoN To the lateral foRce is $o(\varepsiloN)$ Smaller tHan thE pressurE in the innER Region. ThE deForMatIon-INDuCed lateral forCE $f_M$ to CaNcel the MigRation vEloCitY anD to MaIntain the Wall-paraLlEl MoTiOn iS exprESsed as $$F_M\ApProX 
\oInt_{\Rm conTAct}\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!{\rm d}^2{\Bm x}\ 
\vaRepsIlOn^{-3/2}\DEltA
frac{9(14-R^2)\log H}{100H ^3R},
\lab el{eq :a1 }$$  $ $A_2 =-\f rac{9(4-R^2)\l o g H} {50H^4R}.
\label{eq:a2 }$$
Su b stit u ti ng (\ [eq:a2\ ] )i n to(\ [e q:p 1\ ] )estim ate s the a symptoticord er  of the pert u rb ed pressur e $ $\varepsilon ^{- 3/2}\d el ta\ hat{P }^{ (f)}= 
\frac { 12\var epsilon^{ -3 } {\rm C a }
\log( R ^ 2/ 2)}{ 25R^6}+O(R^{-6})\  \ \ {\rm for}\ \  \ R\g g1 ,$ $ whi chis $O({\rm  C a}\lo g \vareps i lo n \ (\v a repsilon^{1/2 }R)^{-6})$i n t he ove rl app i ng reg ion $ R\ s im\varepsilon ^{-1 /2}$, and  thust o be ma t ched wi th the  pr ess ureo f$O ({\ rm Ca} \ lo g\v a rep silon\ r ^{ -6 })$ i n th e o u terreg ion([@on e1967]). This  ou terp res suremay c ontr ib ute t o thelater al  force of $O({\ rm C a}\log\va rep si lon )$ , whi c h is l arg erthan th at fort hewi d e - ga p case, correspond in g to  $O({\rm  Ca})$ .  N ev e rtheless ,asdisc u s sed i n [@ u rz 2007], t he rap i dde cay ofth e pert ur bed  pr essur e  for  $R\gg  1$ indi cates that the contr i bution of the ou t e rp ress ure  to the lat eral forc e is ne gli g iblysmall er th a n that of the inner  p ressur e. Th erefore, to e valuate th e l eading-o rder mi g ration force,one d oes not ha v e to sol ve th e outerproblem.( I n fact,the  or der  of t he  lateral forc e (\[e q: fm\_lub \])  evalua ted  on lyinth e inner r egion is  c on fi rm edto be $O({\rmCa }\v ar eps ilon^ { -2})$and l arge rth a n t he oute r  c o n trib ut io n $O ({\ rm  Ca}\ log\ v are psilon) $.) The l ead i ng p re ss ure $\v arepsilon^{-3 /2 }\hat{P}^{ (0 )}\ cos\ph i $  with no  deformation is locally dominan t b ut do es n ot contri but e to t hel ateral  force  dueto  it s azimu t h al  co si ne depende n c e.The v is cous  stress  contribution to t h e l ateral forceis$O(\ v a re psi l on ) $ s ma l ler t han the pressur e in the i nn e rregion. Th e  de fo rmation -induce d lat e ral for ce $F_M$to cancel  t he m i g rat ion veloci ty and t o maintai n  thew al l-par all el mot io n i s exp ressed as$$F_M \appro x
\oint _{\rm  c ontact}\ !\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!{\rm  d}^2{ \bm x }\
\varepsi lon ^ {-3 /2}\delta 
frac{9(14-R^2)\log H}{100H^3R},
\label{eq:a1}$$_$$A_2=-\frac{9(4-R^2)\log H}{50H^4R}.
\label{eq:a2}$$

Substituting_(\[eq:a2\]) into (\[eq:p1\]) estimates_the asymptotic_order_of the_perturbed_pressure $$\varepsilon^{-3/2}\delta
\hat{P}^{(f)}=
\frac{12\varepsilon^{-3}{\rm Ca}
\log(R^2/2)}{25R^6}+O(R^{-6})
\_\ \ {\rm_for}\ \ \ R\gg_1,$$ which is_$O({\rm_Ca}\log\varepsilon\ (\varepsilon^{1/2}R)^{-6})$ in the overlapping region $R\sim \varepsilon^{-1/2}$, and thus to be matched with_the_pressure of_$O({\rm_Ca}\log\varepsilon\_r^{-6})$ in the outer region_([@one1967]). This outer pressure may_contribute to_the lateral force of $O({\rm Ca}\log\varepsilon)$, which is_larger_than that for_the wide-gap case, corresponding to $O({\rm Ca})$. Nevertheless, as_discussed in [@urz2007], the rapid decay_of the perturbed_pressure_for_$R\gg 1$ indicates that_the contribution of the outer pressure_to the lateral force is negligibly_smaller than that of the inner pressure._Therefore, to evaluate the leading-order migration_force, one does not have_to solve_the outer problem. (In fact,_the order of_the lateral_force (\[eq:fm\_lub\]) evaluated_only in the inner region is_confirmed to be_$O({\rm Ca}\varepsilon^{-2})$ and larger than the_outer_contribution $O({\rm Ca}\log\varepsilon)$.)_The_leading_pressure $\varepsilon^{-3/2}\hat{P}^{(0)}\cos\phi$_with no deformation_is_locally dominant_but_does not contribute to the lateral_force_due to its azimuthal cosine dependence. The_viscous stress contribution to_the_lateral force is $O(\varepsilon)$_smaller than the pressure in_the inner region. The deformation-induced lateral_force $F_M$_to cancel_the migration velocity and to maintain the wall-parallel motion is expressed_as $$F_M\approx 
\oint_{\rm contact}\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!{\rm d}^2{\bm x}\_
\varepsilon^{-3/2}\delta