 its action contains higher derivatives. Combining the Horndeski gravity with the mimetic idea, the mimetic constraint will eliminate the dynamics and degrade the dynamical component to a constraint. This is consistent with the result of Ref. [@Arroja:2015yvd], in which the perturbation equations of the mimetic Horndeski gravity have been studied. In general case, $\alpha+\beta\neq 0$, one can see from Eq. (\[equationshift1\]) that the divergence of $N^i$ is proportional to the time derivative of the curvature perturbation and has no relation with its spatial derivatives. This is the origin of the gradient instability in the model considered in this section. Substitute Eq. (\[equationshift1\]) to the action (\[mimeticbox2\]) and using the background equation we get the quadratic actions for the cosmological perturbations of this model, \[quadratic\] S\^[(2)]{}=d\^4x a\^3\[\_[ij]{}\_[ij]{}-\_l\_[ij]{}\_l\_[ij]{}+\^2+\_i\_i\] . So, to have no ghost, we need $f+2\beta>0$, and $(3\alpha+\beta-f)/(\alpha+\beta)>0$. This is possible by appropriate choices of the function $f$ and the parameters $\alpha$ and $\beta$. However, if we requires the tensor perturbation being free from the gradient instability, $f$ should be positive, and this will cause the gradient instability in the scalar perturbation. The quadratic action (\[quadratic\]) tells us that this difficulty cannot be cured by simply adding more higher derivatives in the original action. This is because the spatial derivative terms of the scalar and tensor perturbations have nothing to do with higher derivative terms of the mimetic field, they are totally come from the three dimensional curvature $^{(3)}R$, as pointed out in Ref. [@Ijjas:2016pad] for the model(\[mimeticbox\]). This is easily seen in the unitary gauge. As we mentioned before, higher derivative terms of the mimetic field are identical to the extrinsic curvature terms which by definitions depend on the time derivatives of $\zeta$ and $\gamma_{ij}$ (through $\dot h_{ij}$ in the definitions of $E_{ij}$) and the divergence of the shift vector $N^i$. The result (\[equationshift1\]) showed that this divergence also has nothing to do with the spatial derivatives of the scalar and tensor perturbations. So, the $\
its action contains higher derivatives. compound the Horndeski graveness with the mimetic idea, the mimetic constraint will rule out the moral force and degrade the dynamical component to a restraint. This is coherent with the result of Ref. [ @Arroja:2015yvd ], in which the disturbance equations of the mimetic Horndeski gravity have been learn. In general case, $ \alpha+\beta\neq 0 $, one can visualize from Eq. (\[equationshift1\ ]) that the divergence of $ N^i$ is proportional to the time derivative of the curvature perturbation and has no relation with its spatial derived function. This is the origin of the gradient instability in the model consider in this section. Substitute Eq. (\[equationshift1\ ]) to the action (\[mimeticbox2\ ]) and using the background equality we get the quadratic natural process for the cosmological perturbations of this model, \[quadratic\ ] S\^[(2)]{}=d\^4x a\^3\[\_[ij]{}\_[ij]{}-\_l\_[ij]{}\_l\_[ij]{}+\^2+\_i\_i\ ]  . therefore, to have no ghost, we need $ f+2\beta>0 $, and $ (3\alpha+\beta - f)/(\alpha+\beta)>0$. This is possible by appropriate choices of the function $ f$ and the parameters $ \alpha$ and $ \beta$. However, if we requires the tensor perturbation being free from the gradient instability, $ f$ should be positive, and this will cause the gradient instability in the scalar perturbation. The quadratic action (\[quadratic\ ]) tells us that this trouble cannot be bring around by simply lend more eminent derivatives in the original action. This is because the spatial derivative terms of the scalar and tensor perturbations have nothing to do with higher derivative term of the mimetic field, they are totally come from the three dimensional curvature $ ^{(3)}R$, as pointed out in Ref. [ @Ijjas:2016pad ] for the model(\[mimeticbox\ ]). This is easily seen in the one gauge. As we mentioned before, higher derivative terms of the mimetic field are identical to the extrinsic curvature terms which by definition depend on the time derivatives of $ \zeta$ and $ \gamma_{ij}$ (through $ \dot h_{ij}$ in the definitions of $ E_{ij}$) and the divergence of the chemise vector $ N^i$. The result (\[equationshift1\ ]) showed that this divergence also has nothing to do with the spatial derivatives of the scalar and tensor perturbations. indeed, the $ \
 itd action contains higher derivatives. Combining the Hkrndeski gravity with the mimetic idxa, tye minetic constraint will dliminate the dynqmicw and degravs the dnuamiczp cok'onent to a conxtraint. Thhs is consistett wnth the result of Ref. [@Arroja:2015yvd], in wrich thr oerturbation ezuatpogs or the mimetic Horndeski gravity habe been studied. In grneral case, $\alpha+\beta\neq 0$, lne fan see from Eq. (\[eqkationshift1\]) thae the divergevce of $N^i$ pv proportiknal to the time derivative of ghe cbrvature petcyrbwjion and has no rvlation with lns spathal derovatives. This ls thx orugin of the gradient mnstability in the mjdel conshdzred in this section. Wuvstitote Ex. (\[eqjqtiunsgiht1\]) fo the acvion (\[mimetidbox2\]) and usung the background tquwnoon we get tge quaqrwtic actions for the cosmological pertugbatjons of this model, \[quadeatic\] S\^[(2)]{}=d\^4x a\^3\[\_[ij]{}\_[ij]{}-\_l\_[ij]{}\_l\_[ij]{}+\^2+\_l\_i\] . So, to rave no ghost, we need $f+2\beta>0$, and $(3\alpha+\beta-f)/(\alpha+\beda)>0$. Thms is pjrwihle by appropriate choices of the function $f$ whd tme parameters $\aliha$ and $\beta$. Howevrr, ig we requires jhe tensor perturbation beinh free srom rhe graditnt imstability, $f$ should be posirive, and thif will cause the grcdient instayility in tne scalar perturbation. Che quzdratic actlon (\[quadrzgic\]) tells us thag tmis difficulty cannot be cureq by simpoy abding mofe hogher qerivatived in bve original action. This iv because hhe spatial derivative terms of the scalar anc denvor pertbrbatipns have nothyng to do with higher derixative terjs of tie mimetic fyeld, they are jotally come hrom the ehrew dinensionxu curvature $^{(3)}R$, ss pointeb out in Ref. [@Ijjas:2016pad] fpr jhs model(\[mimeticbix\]). Uhus is easily sren in tje ughtary gauge. Ds wd mdmtiondd before, hlghdr drrivative terms of tve mjmetic field are icektical to the extwinsic curvatire terms which by defiiitionr deprnd on the time derivatives of $\zefa$ and $\galma_{lj}$ (through $\doe h_{im}$ in the definntions of $E_{ij}$) and the divergence of the whift vector $N^i$. Thw result (\[equationshnfu1\]) showed that this divergenwe also has nothing ro do with the spstial derivatives of fhe scdlar wnd tensor perturbations. So, the $\
its action contains higher derivatives. Combining the with mimetic idea, mimetic constraint will the component to a This is consistent the result of Ref. [@Arroja:2015yvd], in the perturbation equations of the mimetic Horndeski gravity have been studied. In general $\alpha+\beta\neq 0$, one can see from Eq. (\[equationshift1\]) that the divergence of $N^i$ proportional the derivative the curvature perturbation and has no relation with its spatial derivatives. This is the origin of gradient instability in the model considered in this Substitute Eq. (\[equationshift1\]) to action (\[mimeticbox2\]) and using the equation get the actions the perturbations of this \[quadratic\] S\^[(2)]{}=d\^4x a\^3\[\_[ij]{}\_[ij]{}-\_l\_[ij]{}\_l\_[ij]{}+\^2+\_i\_i\] . So, to have no ghost, we need $f+2\beta>0$, and $(3\alpha+\beta-f)/(\alpha+\beta)>0$. This is possible appropriate choices function $f$ the $\alpha$ $\beta$. However, if the tensor perturbation being free from $f$ should be positive, and this will cause gradient instability the scalar perturbation. The quadratic action tells us that this difficulty cannot be cured simply adding more higher derivatives in the original action. This is because the spatial derivative the scalar and tensor have nothing to with derivative of mimetic field, are totally come from the three dimensional curvature $^{(3)}R$, as pointed in Ref. [@Ijjas:2016pad] for the model(\[mimeticbox\]). This is easily seen unitary As we mentioned higher derivative terms of mimetic are identical to the terms by the derivatives $\zeta$ and $\gamma_{ij}$ (through h_{ij}$ in the definitions of and the divergence of result (\[equationshift1\]) showed that this divergence also has to do with the spatial derivatives of scalar and tensor perturbations. So, the $\
 its action contains higher deRivatives. COmbinIng The hoRndeSki gRavity with the mIMetiC idea, the mimetic constraInt wiLl ELimiNAtE the dYnamics ANd DEGraDe ThE dyNaMIcAl comPonEnt to a cOnstraint. THis Is Consistent wiTH tHe result of ref. [@arroja:2015yvd], in wHicH the peRtUrbATion eQuaTions Of the mIMetic HOrndeski gRaVIty havE Been stuDIEd. in geNeral case, $\alpha+\betA\NeQ 0$, One can see from EQ. (\[equatIoNShIFT1\]) thAt tHe divergenCe Of $N^i$ iS ProportIOnAL TO thE Time derivativE of the curvaTUre PerturBaTioN And has No relAtIOn wIth its spatiAl deRivatives. this is THe origiN Of the grAdient InsTabIlitY In ThE moDeL ConSIdEreD In tHis sectiOn. suBstitUte EQ. (\[EQUAtioNshIft1\]) tO the aCtion (\[mimeticbOx2\]) aNd usINg tHe bacKgrouNd eqUaTion wE get thE quadRaTic actions for thE cosMological PerTuRbaTiOns of THis modEl, \[qUadRatic\] S\^[(2)]{}=d\^4X a\^3\[\_[ij]{}\_[ij]{}-\_l\_[IJ]{}\_l\_[iJ]{}+\^2+\_i\_I\] . sO, To Have no ghost, we need $f+2\BeTA>0$, AnD $(3\alpha+\beTa-f)/(\alpHA+\bEtA)>0$. this is poSsIblE by aPPRopriAte cHOiCes of the FunctiON $f$ AnD the parAmEters $\aLpHa$ aNd $\bEta$. HoWEver, If we reQuires thE tensOR perturbation bEIng free from thE GrADIeNT insTabIlity, $f$ shoulD be pOSitiVe, anD ThIs wILl cauSe the GrADiENt instability in the sCaLar perTurbaTion. The quadraTic action (\[qUADRatic\]) telLs us THaT This difficulty CannoT be cured by SImply addIng moRe higher DerivativES In the oriGinAl aCtiOn. THIS iS because the spATIal dErIvative TerMs of the ScaLar And TenSoR perturbaTions havE nOtHiNg To dO with HIgher derIvAtiVe TerMs of tHE mimetIc fieLd, thEy ArE TotAlly comE FrOM The tHrEe DimeNsiOnAl curVatuRE $^{(3)}R$, aS pointeD out in Ref. [@ijjAS:2016pad] FoR tHe model(\[Mimeticbox\]). ThiS iS easily seeN iN thE unitaRY Gauge. As wE mentioned before, higher dERivativE teRms of The mImetic fieLd aRe idenTicAL to the ExtrinSic cuRvAtuRE Terms WHIcH by DeFinitions dEPEnd On the TiMe deRivativEs of $\zeta$ and $\gamma_{ij}$ (THroUgh $\dot h_{ij}$ in thE deFiniTIOnS of $e_{Ij}$) ANd tHe DIveRGEnce of the shift vEctor $N^i$. The ReSUlT (\[equationsHIft1\]) ShOwed thaT this diVergeNCe also hAs nothing To do with tHe SpatIAL deRivatives oF the scalAr and tensOR pertURbAtionS. So, The $\
 its action contains highe r derivati ves.Com bin in g th e Ho rndeski gravit y  wit h the mimetic idea, th e mim et i c co n st raint  will e l im i n ate  t he  dy na m ic s and  de grade t he dynamic alco mponent to a co nstraint.Thi s is consist ent  withth e r e sultofRef.[@Arro j a:2015 yvd], inwh i ch the perturb a t io n eq uations of the mi m et i c Horndeski gr avityha v eb e enstu died. In g en eralc ase, $\ a lp h a + \be t a\neq 0$, one  can see fr o m E q. (\[ eq uat i onshif t1\])  t h atthe diverge nceof $N^i$is pro p ortiona l  to the  timeder iva tive of  t hecu r vat u re  pe r tur bation a nd  h as no  rel a t i o n wi thitsspati al derivative s.This isthe o rigin  ofth e gra dientinsta bi lity in the mod el c onsidered  in  t his  s ectio n . Subs tit ute  Eq. (\ [equati o nsh if t 1 \ ])  to the action (\[ mi m e ti cbox2\])  and u s in gt he backg ro und  equ a t ion w e ge t  t he quadr atic a c ti on s for t he  cosmo lo gic alpertu r bati ons of  this mo del,\ [quadratic\] S \ ^[(2)]{}=d\^4 x  a \ ^ 3\ [ \_[i j]{ }\_[ij]{}-\ _l\_ [ ij]{ }\_l \ _[ ij] { }+\^2 +\_i\ _i \ ].  So, to have no gho st , we n eed $ f+2\beta>0$,and $(3\al p h a +\beta-f )/(\ a lp h a+\beta)>0$. T his i s possible by appro priat e choice s of thef u nction $ f$and  th e p a r am eters $\alpha $ and$\ beta$.How ever, i f w e r equ ire sthe tenso r pertur ba ti on  b ein g fre e  from th egra di ent  inst a bility , $f$  sho ul db e p ositive ,  a n d  thi swi ll c aus ethe g radi e ntinstabi lity in t hes cala rpe rturbat ion. The quad ra tic action  ( \[q uadrat i c \]) tell s us that this difficul t y canno t b e cur ed b y simplyadd ing mo reh igherderiva tives  i n t h e  orig i n al  ac ti on. This i s bec auseth e sp atial d erivative terms of the  scalar and t ens or p e r tu rba t io n s h av e  no t h ing to do withhigher der iv a ti ve terms o f  th emimetic  field,  they are tot ally come  from the  t hree d ime nsional cu rvature$^{(3)}R$ ,  as p o in ted o utin Ref .[@I jjas: 2016pa d ] f or th e mode l( \[mime ticbo x\ ]). This  is easily seen in theunitar y gau ge.  As we me nti o ned  before,high er derivat ive  te rms o f t h e mim etic fi eld are i dent i cal to th e  e xtr i n si c curvature t e rms  whic h b y  defin itio ns depend on thet ime derivative s of $ \ze ta$ and$\ gamma_{ij}$ (t hro ug h $\dot h_ {i j}$ in thedefiniti on s  of $ E_{ij} $) and  the di v e rg e nce of  the  sh ift vecto r $ N^ i $. There su l t (\[e quat io nshift 1\]) s h owed t hat this diverge nce a l s o has not hingto  do wit h  the  spatial d erivativesof the  sca lar a nd tens or  pertu rba ti ons. So, t h e $\
 its_action contains_higher derivatives. Combining the_Horndeski gravity_with_the mimetic_idea,_the mimetic constraint_will eliminate the_dynamics and degrade the_dynamical component to_a_constraint. This is consistent with the result of Ref. [@Arroja:2015yvd], in which the perturbation_equations_of the_mimetic_Horndeski_gravity have been studied. In_general case, $\alpha+\beta\neq 0$, one_can see_from Eq. (\[equationshift1\]) that the divergence of $N^i$_is_proportional to the_time derivative of the curvature perturbation and has no_relation with its spatial derivatives. This_is the origin_of_the_gradient instability in the_model considered in this section. Substitute_Eq. (\[equationshift1\]) to the action (\[mimeticbox2\])_and using the background equation we get_the quadratic actions for the cosmological_perturbations of this model, \[quadratic\]_S\^[(2)]{}=d\^4x a\^3\[\_[ij]{}\_[ij]{}-\_l\_[ij]{}\_l\_[ij]{}+\^2+\_i\_i\] ._So, to have no ghost,_we need $f+2\beta>0$,_and $(3\alpha+\beta-f)/(\alpha+\beta)>0$._This is possible_by appropriate choices of the function_$f$ and the_parameters $\alpha$ and $\beta$. However, if_we_requires the tensor_perturbation_being_free from_the gradient instability,_$f$_should be_positive,_and this will cause the gradient_instability_in the scalar perturbation. The quadratic action_(\[quadratic\]) tells us that_this_difficulty cannot be cured_by simply adding more higher_derivatives in the original action. This_is because_the spatial_derivative terms of the scalar and tensor perturbations have nothing to_do with higher derivative terms of_the mimetic field, they_are totally_come_from the three_dimensional_curvature $^{(3)}R$,_as pointed out in Ref. [@Ijjas:2016pad] for_the model(\[mimeticbox\])._This is easily seen in the_unitary gauge. As we_mentioned_before, higher derivative terms of the_mimetic field are identical to the_extrinsic curvature terms which by_definitions_depend_on the time derivatives of_$\zeta$ and $\gamma_{ij}$ (through $\dot h_{ij}$_in the definitions_of $E_{ij}$) and the divergence of the_shift_vector $N^i$. The result (\[equationshift1\]) showed_that_this divergence also has nothing to_do_with_the spatial derivatives of the_scalar and tensor perturbations. So, the_$\