emptyset = +\infty$. We then define the Markov chain $(Z^{u,\varepsilon}_n)_{n \in {{\mathbb N}}}$ as $$Z^{u,\varepsilon}_n:=U^{u,\varepsilon}(\eta_n,\cdot)$$ for each $n \in {{\mathbb N}}_0$ and set $\vartheta^u_\varepsilon := \min \{ n \in {{\mathbb N}}: Z^{u,\varepsilon}_n \in {\partial}G\}$. Just as in the previous section, for our purposes we will not need to worry about the possibility of $Z_n^\varepsilon$ not being well defined. Also, the constants $r_1$ and $r_2$ will be later taken conveniently small It is not hard to see that for any $u \in {\partial}B_{r_1}$ the strong Markov property yields $$\label{cociente}
P_u \left( U^{\varepsilon}(\tau_\varepsilon(\partial G),\cdot) \notin \partial^{\pm z} \right) \leq \sup_{v \in {\partial}B_{r_1}} \frac{ P_v ( Z_1^\varepsilon \in {\partial}G - {\partial}^{\pm z} )}{P_v ( Z_1^\varepsilon \in {\partial}G)}$$ from which we conclude that in order to show (ii) it will suffice to give a lower bound for the denominator and an upper bound for the numerator such that the quotient of these bounds goes to zero with $\varepsilon$. The following lemma, whose proof can be found in [@B1], provides the desired lower bound.

\[lemab0\] Let us suppose that $r_1$ is sufficiently small so as to guarantee that for any $u \in {\partial}B_{r_1}$ the deterministic orbit $\{ U^u(t,\cdot) : t \geq 0 \}$ does not intersect ${\partial}B_{\frac{r_2}{2}}$. Then for all $\varepsilon > 0$ sufficiently small $$\inf_{u \in {\partial}B_{r_1}} P_u( Z_1^\varepsilon \in {\partial}G) \geq e^{- \frac{\Delta + k r_2}{\varepsilon^2} },$$ where $k > 0$ is a constant which does not depend on the choice of $r_1$ and $r_2$.

The upper bound on the numerator in is more involved
emptyset = + \infty$. We then define the Markov chain $ (Z^{u,\varepsilon}_n)_{n \in { { \mathbb N}}}$ as $ $ Z^{u,\varepsilon}_n:=U^{u,\varepsilon}(\eta_n,\cdot)$$ for each $ n \in { { \mathbb N}}_0 $ and set $ \vartheta^u_\varepsilon: = \min \ { n \in { { \mathbb N } }: Z^{u,\varepsilon}_n \in { \partial}G\}$. barely as in the former section, for our purposes we will not necessitate to concern about the possibility of $ Z_n^\varepsilon$ not being well defined. Also, the constant $ r_1 $ and $ r_2 $ will be later taken handily humble It is not hard to experience that for any $ u \in { \partial}B_{r_1}$ the strong Markov place yields $ $ \label{cociente } 
 P_u \left (U^{\varepsilon}(\tau_\varepsilon(\partial G),\cdot) \notin \partial^{\pm z } \right) \leq \sup_{v \in { \partial}B_{r_1 } } \frac { P_v (Z_1^\varepsilon \in { \partial}G - { \partial}^{\pm z }) } { P_v (Z_1^\varepsilon \in { \partial}G)}$$ from which we conclude that in order to show (ii) it will suffice to give a lower oblige for the denominator and an upper bound for the numerator such that the quotient of these bounds goes to zero with $ \varepsilon$. The following lemma, whose validation can be found in [ @B1 ], provides the desire lower bound. 

 \[lemab0\ ] permit us suppose that $ r_1 $ is sufficiently small so as to guarantee that for any $ u \in { \partial}B_{r_1}$ the deterministic orbit $ \ { U^u(t,\cdot): t \geq 0 \}$ does not intersect $ { \partial}B_{\frac{r_2}{2}}$. Then for all $ \varepsilon > 0 $ sufficiently belittled $ $ \inf_{u \in { \partial}B_{r_1 } } P_u (Z_1^\varepsilon \in { \partial}G) \geq e^{- \frac{\Delta + k r_2}{\varepsilon^2 } }, $ $ where $ k > 0 $ is a constant which does not depend on the choice of $ r_1 $ and $ r_2$. 

 The upper bound on the numerator in is more involved
emphyset = +\infty$. We then deflne the Markov ckqin $(Z^{u,\tarepsimon}_n)_{n \in {{\mathbb N}}}$ as $$Z^{u,\varepsilon}_n:=U^{u,\tarepsilob}(\eta_n,\cdot)$$ for each $n \iv {{\mathbb J}}_0$ and ser $\vactheta^u_\varepsiloi := \min \{ k \in {{\jwthby I}}: Z^{u,\varepsilon}_n \in {\partian}G\}$. Just as in dhd 'revious section, for our purposes we will npt need to worry abolt the iowsibility of $Z_n^\varepsilon$ not being xell defined. Alxo, the constants $r_1$ and $r_2$ wlll he later taken congeniently snall Ut is not hafd to see uhct for any $o \in {\partial}B_{r_1}$ the strong Markov propzrty yields $$\lqbep{wociente}
P_u \oeft( L^{\varepsilon}(\tam_\narepsinon(\partoal G),\cdot) \notik \parvial^{\pm z} \right) \leq \sup_{v \ii {\partial}B_{r_1}} \frac{ P_v ( Z_1^\varepsinou \in {\partial}G - {\partiao}^{\pn z} )}{P_e ( Z_1^\eareowilun \jn {\pzrtial}H)}$$ fcom which ws conclude rhat in order to shpw (po) it will surfice eo give a lower bound for the denominator ans an upper bound for thw numerator such that the quotyent of these bounds goes to zero with $\varepsilon$. The houloclkg ldnmw, whose proof can be found in [@B1], provides the qssorvd lower bound.

\[lemcb0\] Let us supposr hhsj $r_1$ is sufficigntly smalm so as to guarantfe that for qny $u \in {\kartisl}B_{r_1}$ the deterministic orbir $\{ U^u(t,\cdot) : n \gew 0 \}$ does not interdect ${\partiau}B_{\frsc{r_2}{2}}$. Tnen for all $\varepsilon > 0$ surficiently dmall $$\inf_{h \in {\partial}B_{r_1}} P_u( Z_1^\vsrapsilon \in {\partial}G) \geq e^{- \srac{\Delta + k x_2}{\varepsiuon^2} },$$ where $k > 0$ is a fonstant which does not fepenb on dhe choice of $r_1$ and $r_2$.

The upper bound on tix numerator im hs kore invjlved
emptyset = +\infty$. We then define the $(Z^{u,\varepsilon}_n)_{n {{\mathbb N}}}$ $$Z^{u,\varepsilon}_n:=U^{u,\varepsilon}(\eta_n,\cdot)$$ for each set := \min \{ \in {{\mathbb N}}: \in {\partial}G\}$. Just as in the section, for our purposes we will not need to worry about the possibility $Z_n^\varepsilon$ not being well defined. Also, the constants $r_1$ and $r_2$ will be taken small is hard to see that for any $u \in {\partial}B_{r_1}$ the strong Markov property yields $$\label{cociente} P_u U^{\varepsilon}(\tau_\varepsilon(\partial G),\cdot) \notin \partial^{\pm z} \right) \leq \sup_{v {\partial}B_{r_1}} \frac{ P_v ( \in {\partial}G - {\partial}^{\pm z} ( \in {\partial}G)}$$ which conclude in order to (ii) it will suffice to give a lower bound for the denominator and an upper bound for numerator such quotient of bounds to with $\varepsilon$. The whose proof can be found in desired lower bound. \[lemab0\] Let us suppose that is sufficiently so as to guarantee that for $u \in {\partial}B_{r_1}$ the deterministic orbit $\{ U^u(t,\cdot) t \geq 0 \}$ does not intersect ${\partial}B_{\frac{r_2}{2}}$. Then for all $\varepsilon > 0$ sufficiently \in {\partial}B_{r_1}} P_u( Z_1^\varepsilon {\partial}G) \geq e^{- + r_2}{\varepsilon^2} where > 0$ a constant which does not depend on the choice of $r_1$ $r_2$. The upper bound on the numerator in is more
emptyset = +\infty$. We then define The Markov cHain $(Z^{U,\vaRepSiLon}_n)_{N \in {{\mAthbb N}}}$ as $$Z^{u,\varePSiloN}_n:=U^{u,\varepsilon}(\eta_n,\cdot)$$ For eaCh $N \In {{\maTHbB N}}_0$ and Set $\vartHEtA^U_\VarEpSiLon := \MiN \{ N \iN {{\mathBb N}}: z^{u,\varepSilon}_n \in {\paRtiAl}g\}$. Just as in the PReVious sectiOn, fOr our purposeS we Will noT nEed TO worrY abOut thE possiBIlity oF $Z_n^\varepsIlON$ not beINg well dEFInEd. AlSo, the constants $r_1$ anD $R_2$ wILl be later taken ConvenIeNTlY SMalL It Is not hard tO sEe thaT For any $u \IN {\pARTIal}b_{R_1}$ the strong MarKov property YIelDs $$\labeL{cOciENte}
P_u \lEft( U^{\vArEPsiLon}(\tau_\varepSiloN(\partial G),\Cdot) \noTIn \partiAL^{\pm z} \rigHt) \leq \sUp_{v \In {\pArtiAL}B_{R_1}} \fRac{ p_v ( z_1^\VarEPsIloN \In {\pArtial}G - {\pArTiAl}^{\pm z} )}{p_v ( Z_1^\vAREPSiloN \in {\PartIal}G)}$$ fRom which we conCluDe thAT in Order To shoW (ii) iT wIll suFfice tO give A lOwer bound for the DenoMinator anD an UpPer BoUnd foR The numEraTor Such thaT the quoTIenT oF THEsE bounds goes to zero wItH $\VArEpsilon$. THe follOWiNg LEmma, whosE pRooF can BE Found In [@B1], pROvIdes the dEsired LOwEr Bound.

\[leMaB0\] Let us SuPpoSe tHat $r_1$ iS SuffIcientLy small sO as to GUarantee that foR Any $u \in {\partial}b_{R_1}$ tHE DeTErmiNisTic orbit $\{ U^u(t,\Cdot) : T \Geq 0 \}$ dOes nOT iNteRSect ${\pArtiaL}B_{\FRaC{R_2}{2}}$. Then for all $\varepsilOn > 0$ SufficIentlY small $$\inf_{u \in {\pArtial}B_{r_1}} P_u( z_1^\VARepsilon \In {\paRTiAL}G) \geq e^{- \frac{\DeltA + k r_2}{\vaRepsilon^2} },$$ whERe $k > 0$ is a coNstanT which doEs not depeND On the choIce Of $r_1$ And $R_2$.

ThE UPpEr bound on the nUMEratOr In is morE inVolved
emptyset = +\infty$. We th en definethe M ark ovch ain$(Z^ {u,\varepsilon } _n)_ {n \in {{\mathbb N}}}$  as $ $Z ^ {u,\ v ar epsil on}_n:= U ^{ u , \va re ps ilo n} ( \e ta_n, \cd ot)$$ f or each $n  \i n{{\mathbb N} } _0 $ and set$\v artheta^u_\v are psilon  : = \ m in \{  n\in { {\math b b N}}:  Z^{u,\va re p silon} _ n \in { \ p ar tial }G\}$. Just as in th e  previous sect ion, f or ou r pur pos es we will  n ot ne e d to wo r ry a b out the possibili ty of $Z_n^ \ var epsilo n$  no t  being  well  d e fin ed. Also, t he c onstants$r_1$a nd $r_2 $  will b e late r t ake n co n ve ni ent ly sma l lIti s n ot hardto  s ee th at f o r a ny $ u \ in { \part ial}B_{r_1}$the  str o ngMarko v pro pert yyield s $$\l abel{ co ciente}
P_u \le ft(U^{\varep sil on }(\ ta u_\va r epsilo n(\ par tial G) ,\cdot) \no ti n \ pa rtial^{\pm z} \rig ht ) \l eq \sup_ {v \in {\ pa r tial}B_{ r_ 1}}  \fr a c { P_v  ( Z _ 1^ \varepsi lon \i n  { \p artial} G- {\pa rt ial }^{ \pm z }  )}{ P_v (Z_1^\var epsil o n \in {\partia l }G)}$$ from w h ic h we conc lud e that in o rder to s how( ii ) i t  will  suff ic e  t o  give a lower bound  f or the  deno minator and a n upper bo u n d  for the  num e ra t or such that t he qu otient oft hese bou nds g oes to z ero with$ \ varepsil on$ . T hefol l o wi ng lemma, who s e  pro of  can be  fo und in[@B 1],  pr ovi de s the des ired low er  b ou nd .
\[lem a b0\] Let  u s s up pos e tha t  $r_1$  is s uffi ci en t lysmall s o  a s to g ua ra ntee  th at  forany$ u \ in {\pa rtial}B_{ r_1 } $ th ede termini stic orbit $\ {U^u(t,\cdo t)  :t \geq 0  \}$ doe s not intersect ${\part i al}B_{\ fra c{r_2 }{2} }$. Thenfor  all $ \va r epsilo n > 0$  suff ic ien t l y sma l l  $ $\i nf _{u \in {\ p a rti al}B_ {r _1}}  P_u( Z _1^\varepsilon \in {\p artial}G) \ge q e ^{-\ f ra c{\ D el t a +  k r_2 } { \varepsilon^2}},$$ where  $ k  >  0$ is a c o nst an t which  does n ot de p end onthe choic e of $r_1 $and$ r _2$ .

The upp er bound  on the n u merat o rin is  mo re inv ol ved 
emptyset =_+\infty$. We_then define the Markov_chain $(Z^{u,\varepsilon}_n)_{n_\in_{{\mathbb N}}}$_as_$$Z^{u,\varepsilon}_n:=U^{u,\varepsilon}(\eta_n,\cdot)$$ for each_$n \in {{\mathbb_N}}_0$ and set $\vartheta^u_\varepsilon_:= \min \{_n_\in {{\mathbb N}}: Z^{u,\varepsilon}_n \in {\partial}G\}$. Just as in the previous section, for our_purposes_we will_not_need_to worry about the possibility_of $Z_n^\varepsilon$ not being well_defined. Also,_the constants $r_1$ and $r_2$ will be later_taken_conveniently small It_is not hard to see that for any $u_\in {\partial}B_{r_1}$ the strong Markov property_yields $$\label{cociente}
P_u \left(_U^{\varepsilon}(\tau_\varepsilon(\partial_G),\cdot)_\notin \partial^{\pm z} \right)_\leq \sup_{v \in {\partial}B_{r_1}} \frac{ P_v_( Z_1^\varepsilon \in {\partial}G - {\partial}^{\pm_z} )}{P_v ( Z_1^\varepsilon \in {\partial}G)}$$ from_which we conclude that in order_to show (ii) it will_suffice to_give a lower bound for_the denominator and_an upper_bound for the_numerator such that the quotient of_these bounds goes_to zero with $\varepsilon$. The following_lemma,_whose proof can_be_found_in [@B1],_provides the desired_lower_bound.

\[lemab0\] Let_us_suppose that $r_1$ is sufficiently small_so_as to guarantee that for any $u_\in {\partial}B_{r_1}$ the deterministic_orbit_$\{ U^u(t,\cdot) : t_\geq 0 \}$ does not_intersect ${\partial}B_{\frac{r_2}{2}}$. Then for all $\varepsilon_> 0$_sufficiently small_$$\inf_{u \in {\partial}B_{r_1}} P_u( Z_1^\varepsilon \in {\partial}G) \geq e^{- \frac{\Delta +_k r_2}{\varepsilon^2} },$$ where $k >_0$ is a constant_which does_not_depend on the_choice_of $r_1$_and $r_2$.

The upper bound on the numerator_in is_more involved