 ($\Delta
  E_{Arr}^*\!=\!\Delta E_{Arr} / T_{MCT}$) for different model systems. The data of MLJ, MSS, BMLJ and BMLJ$_2$ are from this work (except the $\Delta E_{Arr}^*$ for BMLJ, that is from Ref. [@sastry_pisa]).

Having in mind that $\Delta E_{Arr}^* \! \simeq \! 2 \Delta E^*$ and that $\Delta E^*\! \simeq\!10$ (i.e. $\Delta E_{Arr}^*
\!\simeq\! 20$), we can try to analyze what is observed for other model potentials existing in the literature where the $D(T)$ has been determined. We found three different models for which a low temperature analysis of $D(T)$ has been performed [*via*]{} molecular dynamics: [*i)*]{} The BKS-silica model [@horbac], for which the values of $\Delta E_{Arr}^*$ are $16.2$ and $18.0$, for the self diffusion of $O$ and $Si$ respectively; [*ii)*]{} the Lewis and Wahnström ortho-terphenyl model [@mossa], for which the temperature dependence of the molecular center of mass diffusion coefficient at five different densities give values of reduced barrier energy $\Delta E_{Arr}^* \simeq 20 \div 28$ (except the lowest density that gives a value of about $10$); [*iii)*]{} The SPC/E-water model [@starr], for which one finds $\Delta E_{Arr}^* \simeq 40$. Table \[table2\] summarizes the known results on energy barrier heights estimated from saddles and from Arrhenius low-temperature dependence of diffusivity. The values for MLJ, MSS, BMLJ and BMLJ$_2$ are from the present work, except the $\Delta E^*_{Arr}$ for BMLJ that is obtained from Ref. [@sastry_pisa]. In future works we will try to determine the saddle-barriers $\Delta E^*$ for non-LJ systems (the last three systems in the Table), in order to have a better understanding of the diversity of the different landscapes. In conclusion, besides the case of water, the other systems seem to be in agreement with the findings of this work (the values of the reduced barrier energies are of the same order), evidencing a quite general universality of the observed relations
($ \Delta 
   E_{Arr}^*\!=\!\Delta E_{Arr } / T_{MCT}$) for different model systems. The data of MLJ, MSS, BMLJ and BMLJ$_2 $ are from this workplace (except the $ \Delta E_{Arr}^*$ for BMLJ, that is from Ref. [ @sastry_pisa ]). 

 have in mind that $ \Delta E_{Arr}^ * \! \simeq \! 2 \Delta E^*$ and that $ \Delta E^*\! \simeq\!10 $ (i.e. $ \Delta E_{Arr}^ * 
 \!\simeq\! 20 $), we can try to analyze what is observed for early model potentials existing in the literature where the $ D(T)$ has been decide. We found three different model for which a low temperature analysis of $ D(T)$ has been do [ * via * ] { } molecular dynamics: [ * i) * ] { } The BKS - silica model [ @horbac ], for which the value of $ \Delta E_{Arr}^*$ are $ 16.2 $ and $ 18.0 $, for the self dissemination of $ O$ and $ Si$ respectively; [ * ii) * ] { } the Lewis and Wahnström ortho - terphenyl model [ @mossa ], for which the temperature dependence of the molecular center of mass diffusion coefficient at five unlike densities give values of decreased barrier energy $ \Delta E_{Arr}^ * \simeq 20 \div 28 $ (except the lowest density that gives a value of about $ 10 $); [ * iii) * ] { } The SPC / E - body of water model [ @starr ], for which one finds $ \Delta E_{Arr}^ * \simeq 40$. Table \[table2\ ] summarizes the known results on department of energy barrier heights estimated from saddles and from Arrhenius low - temperature dependence of diffusivity. The values for MLJ, MSS, BMLJ and BMLJ$_2 $ are from the present workplace, except the $ \Delta E^*_{Arr}$ for BMLJ that is obtained from Ref. [ @sastry_pisa ]. In future works we will try to determine the saddle - barriers $ \Delta E^*$ for non - LJ systems (the last three systems in the Table), in order to have a good understanding of the diversity of the different landscape. In conclusion, besides the case of water, the early systems look to be in agreement with the findings of this work (the value of the reduced barrier energies are of the same order), evidencing a quite cosmopolitan universality of the observed relations
 ($\Depta
  E_{Arr}^*\!=\!\Delta E_{Arr} / T_{MCU}$) for different model syvtems. Fhe data of MLJ, MSS, BMLJ and BMLJ$_2$ arx frim thus work (except the $\Delga E_{Arr}^*$ flr BMLJ, rhat us from Reh. [@sastry_insa]).

Hablng iu nind that $\Delts E_{Arr}^* \! \sikeq \! 2 \Delta E^*$ dna chat $\Delta E^*\! \simeq\!10$ (i.e. $\Delta E_{Arr}^*
\!\simez\! 20$), we csn try to analyzg whau if obavryed for other model potentials esisting in the litersture where the $D(T)$ has beej dehermined. We found hhree diffetsnt nodels for wfich a low temperature analysis of $D(T)$ has been perforoed [*vna*]{} moleculat syjdmics: [*i)*]{} The BKS-splica model [@horbac], fos which the values of $\Denta E_{Arr}^*$ are $16.2$ and $18.0$, for tie self diffusion of $O$ and $Si$ rzspectively; [*ii)*]{} the Leqiw and Wahtströo orgho-uer'hehyl mofel [@mossa], for which the remperature dependemcq of the molechlar cqneer of mass diffusion coefficient at fine djfferent densities give values of reduced batrier enerdy $\Delta E_{Arr}^* \simeq 20 \div 28$ (except the lowest densidy thet gircf q galue of about $10$); [*iii)*]{} The SPC/E-water model [@starr], rot ehich one findf $\Delta E_{Art}^* \dikgq 40$. Table \[tablg2\] summaxjzss the known resulhs on egergy barrier reignts estimated from saddles qnd from Arrkenuus low-temperature dependence of ciffuxivity. The values for MUJ, MAS, BMLJ and BMLJ$_2$ are wrom the present wogk, efcept tht $\Delta E^*_{Arr}$ for BILJ that ms obcained ffom Tef. [@sasery_pisa]. In futuva works we will trj to beterkine the swddle-barriers $\Delta E^*$ for non-LJ systems (the lssd tvree syscems ik the Table), in jrder to have c better undefstanding kf the viversity of the differend landscapes. Mn conclufion, besudes thd case of water, the otheg fystwms seem to be in egregmsnt with the fiubibgs of this worl (tfe dapuxs of dhe reduced tarrker rnergkes are of bhe samr order), evidencing a quife general universsllty of thg observeq relations
($\Delta E_{Arr}^*\!=\!\Delta E_{Arr} / T_{MCT}$) for different The of MLJ, BMLJ and BMLJ$_2$ the E_{Arr}^*$ for BMLJ, is from Ref. Having in mind that $\Delta E_{Arr}^* \simeq \! 2 \Delta E^*$ and that $\Delta E^*\! \simeq\!10$ (i.e. $\Delta E_{Arr}^* 20$), we can try to analyze what is observed for other model potentials in literature the has been determined. We found three different models for which a low temperature analysis of $D(T)$ been performed [*via*]{} molecular dynamics: [*i)*]{} The BKS-silica [@horbac], for which the of $\Delta E_{Arr}^*$ are $16.2$ $18.0$, the self of and respectively; [*ii)*]{} the and Wahnström ortho-terphenyl model [@mossa], for which the temperature dependence of the molecular center of mass diffusion at five give values reduced energy E_{Arr}^* \simeq 20 (except the lowest density that gives about $10$); [*iii)*]{} The SPC/E-water model [@starr], for one finds E_{Arr}^* \simeq 40$. Table \[table2\] summarizes known results on energy barrier heights estimated from and from Arrhenius low-temperature dependence of diffusivity. The values for MLJ, MSS, BMLJ and BMLJ$_2$ the present work, except $\Delta E^*_{Arr}$ for that obtained Ref. In future we will try to determine the saddle-barriers $\Delta E^*$ for non-LJ (the last three systems in the Table), in order to better of the diversity the different landscapes. In besides case of water, the seem be the of work (the values of reduced barrier energies are of same order), evidencing a observed relations
 ($\Delta
  E_{Arr}^*\!=\!\Delta E_{Arr} / T_{MCT}$) for Different mOdel sYstEms. thE datA of MlJ, MSS, BMLJ and BMlj$_2$ are From this work (except the $\DElta E_{arR}^*$ For BmlJ, That iS from ReF. [@SaSTRy_pIsA]).

HAviNg IN mInd thAt $\DElta E_{ArR}^* \! \simeq \! 2 \DeltA E^*$ aNd That $\Delta E^*\! \siMEq\!10$ (I.e. $\Delta E_{ArR}^*
\!\siMeq\! 20$), we can try tO anAlyze wHaT is OBservEd fOr othEr modeL PotentIals existInG In the lITeraturE WHeRe thE $D(T)$ has been determiNEd. wE found three difFerent MoDElS FOr wHicH a low tempeRaTure aNAlysis oF $d(T)$ HAS BeeN Performed [*via*]{} mOlecular dynAMicS: [*i)*]{} The BkS-SilICa modeL [@horbAc], FOr wHich the valuEs of $\delta E_{Arr}^*$ Are $16.2$ and $18.0$, FOr the seLF diffusIon of $O$ And $si$ rEspeCTiVeLy; [*iI)*]{} tHE LeWIs And wAhnStröm ortHo-TeRphenYl moDEL [@MOssa], For WhicH the tEmperature depEndEnce OF thE moleCular CentEr Of masS diffuSion cOeFficient at five dIffeRent densiTieS gIve VaLues oF ReduceD baRriEr energY $\Delta E_{aRr}^* \sImEQ 20 \DIv 28$ (Except the lowest denSiTY ThAt gives a Value oF AbOuT $10$); [*Iii)*]{} The SPc/E-WatEr moDEL [@starR], for WHiCh one finDs $\DeltA e_{ARr}^* \Simeq 40$. TaBlE \[table2\] SuMmaRizEs the KNown ResultS on energY barrIEr heights estimATed from saddleS AnD FRoM arrhEniUs low-temperAturE DepeNdenCE oF diFFusivIty. ThE vALuES for MLJ, MSS, BMLJ and BMlJ$_2$ Are froM the pResent work, excEpt the $\DeltA e^*_{aRr}$ for BMLj thaT Is OBtained from Ref. [@SastrY_pisa]. In futURe works wE will Try to detErmine the SADdle-barrIerS $\DeLta e^*$ foR NOn-lJ systems (the lAST thrEe Systems In tHe Table), In oRdeR to HavE a Better undErstandiNg Of ThE dIveRsity OF the diffErEnt LaNdsCapes. iN conclUsion, BesiDeS tHE caSe of watER, tHE OtheR sYsTems SeeM tO be in AgreEMenT with thE findings Of tHIs woRk (ThE values Of the reduced bArRier energiEs Are Of the sAME order), evIdencing a quite general unIVersaliTy oF the oBserVed relatiOns
 ($\Delta
  E_{Arr}^*\!=\! \Delta E_{ Arr}/ T _{M CT }$)fordifferent mode l  sys tems. The data of MLJ,  MSS,  B M LJ a n dBMLJ$ _2$ are fr o m  th is  w ork  ( e xc ept t he$\Delta  E_{Arr}^* $ f or  BMLJ, thati sfrom Ref.[@s astry_pisa]) .
Having  i n m i nd th at$\Del ta E_{ A rr}^*\! \simeq  \ !  2 \De l ta E^*$ a nd  tha t $\Delta E^*\! \ s im e q\!10$ (i.e. $ \Delta  E _ {A r r }^* 
\! \simeq\! 2 0$ ), we can try to a n aly z e what is obs erved for o t her  model  p ote n tialsexist in g  in  the litera ture  where th e $D(T ) $ has b e en dete rmined . W e f ound th re e d if f ere n tmod e lsfor whic halow t empe r a t u re a nal ysis  of $ D(T)$ has bee n p erfo r med  [*vi a*]{}  mol ec ulardynami cs: [ *i )*]{} The BKS-s ilic a model [ @ho rb ac] ,for w h ich th e v alu es of $ \DeltaE _{A rr } ^ * $are $16.2$ and $18 .0 $ ,  f or the s elf di f fu si o n of $O$  a nd$Si$ r espec tive l y;  [*ii)*] {} the Le wi s and W ah nström  o rth o-t erphe n yl m odel [ @mossa],  forw hich the tempe r ature depende n ce o ft he m ole cular cente r of mass  dif f us ion coeff icien ta tf ive different densi ti es giv e val ues of reduce d barriere n e rgy $\De ltaE _{ A rr}^* \simeq 2 0 \di v 28$ (exc e pt the l owest  density  that giv e s  a value  of  ab out  $1 0 $ );  [*iii)*]{} T h e  SPC /E -watermod el [@st arr ],for  wh ic h one fin ds $\Del ta  E _{ Ar r}^ * \si m eq 40$.Ta ble  \ [ta ble2\ ]  summa rizes  the  k no w n r esultso ne n ergy  b ar rier  he ig hts e stim a ted  from s addles an d f r om A rr he nius lo w-temperature  d ependenceof  di ffusiv i t y. The v alues for MLJ, MSS, BML J  and BM LJ$ _2$ a re f rom the p res ent wo rk, except  the $ \Delt aE^* _ { Arr}$ f or  BM LJ  that is o b t ain ed fr om  Ref . [@sas try_pisa]. In futu r e w orks we willtry  tod e te rmi n et hesa d dle - b arriers $\Delta  E^*$ forno n -L J systems( the  l ast thr ee syst ems i n  the Ta ble), inorder toha ve a b ett er underst anding o f the div e rsity of  thedif ferent  l and scape s. Inc onc lusio n, bes id es the  case  o f water,  the other systems seem  to be  in a gre ement wit h t h e f indings o f th is work (t heval ues o f t h e red uced ba rri e r ene rgie s  are of t h esam e or der), evide n c i nga qui teg eneral  uni versality of theo bserved relati ons
 ($\Delta
_ E_{Arr}^*\!=\!\Delta_E_{Arr} / T_{MCT}$) for_different model_systems._The data_of_MLJ, MSS, BMLJ_and BMLJ$_2$ are_from this work (except_the $\Delta E_{Arr}^*$_for_BMLJ, that is from Ref. [@sastry_pisa]).

Having in mind that $\Delta E_{Arr}^* \! \simeq \!_2_\Delta E^*$_and_that_$\Delta E^*\! \simeq\!10$ (i.e. $\Delta_E_{Arr}^*
\!\simeq\! 20$), we can try_to analyze_what is observed for other model potentials existing_in_the literature where_the $D(T)$ has been determined. We found three different_models for which a low temperature_analysis of $D(T)$_has_been_performed [*via*]{} molecular dynamics:_[*i)*]{} The BKS-silica model [@horbac], for_which the values of $\Delta E_{Arr}^*$_are $16.2$ and $18.0$, for the self_diffusion of $O$ and $Si$ respectively;_[*ii)*]{} the Lewis and Wahnström_ortho-terphenyl model_[@mossa], for which the temperature_dependence of the_molecular center_of mass diffusion_coefficient at five different densities give_values of reduced_barrier energy $\Delta E_{Arr}^* \simeq 20_\div_28$ (except the_lowest_density_that gives_a value of_about_$10$); [*iii)*]{}_The_SPC/E-water model [@starr], for which one_finds_$\Delta E_{Arr}^* \simeq 40$. Table \[table2\] summarizes_the known results on_energy_barrier heights estimated from_saddles and from Arrhenius low-temperature_dependence of diffusivity. The values for_MLJ, MSS,_BMLJ and_BMLJ$_2$ are from the present work, except the $\Delta E^*_{Arr}$ for_BMLJ that is obtained from Ref._[@sastry_pisa]. In future works_we will_try_to determine the_saddle-barriers_$\Delta E^*$_for non-LJ systems (the last three systems_in the_Table), in order to have a_better understanding of the_diversity_of the different landscapes. In conclusion,_besides the case of water, the_other systems seem to be_in_agreement_with the findings of this_work (the values of the reduced_barrier energies are_of the same order), evidencing a quite_general_universality of the observed relations