 clearly commute: each $\mathrm{Aut}(Z_i)$ is abelian so that $\mathrm{Loc}(C_n, \mathcal{G})$ is abelian as well. Thus, we have proved that the centraliser of any element of $\mathrm{Inn}(G_n) \rtimes \mathrm{Loc}(C_n, \mathcal{G})$ contains a free abelian group of infinite rank. Therefore, $\mathrm{Inn}(G_n) \rtimes \mathrm{Loc}(C_n, \mathcal{G})$ (and a fortiori $\mathrm{Aut}(G_n)$) cannot be acylindrically hyperbolic according to [@OsinAcyl Corollary 6.9].

In this section, it was more convenient to work with a CAT(0) cube complex rather than with a quasi-median graph because results already available in the literature allowed us to shorten the arguments. However, we emphasize that a quasi-median proof is possible. The main steps are the followings. First, as in Lemma \[prop:extendT\], the action $\Gamma \mathcal{G} \curvearrowright X(\Gamma, \mathcal{G})$ extends to an action $\mathrm{Aut}(\Gamma \mathcal{G}) \curvearrowright X(\Gamma, \mathcal{G})$ via $\iota(g) \varphi \cdot x = g \varphi(x)$ where $x \in X(\Gamma, \mathcal{G})$ is a vertex. So Theorem \[thm:noT\] also follows since Niblo and Roller’s argument [@MR1459140] can be reproduced almost word for word in the quasi-median setting; or alternatively, the theorem follows from the combination of [@MR1459140] with [@Qm Proposition 4.16] which shows that any quasi-median graph admits a “dual” CAT(0) cube complex. Next, in order to prove Theorem \[thm:acyl\_hyp\], we need to notice that $X(\Gamma, \mathcal{G})$ is hyperbolic (as a consequence of [@Qm Fact 8.33]) and that the element $g$ constructed in the proof above turns out to be a WPD element. For the latter observation, one can easily prove the following criterion by following the arguments of [@MoiAcylHyp Theorem 18]: given a group $G$ acting on a hyperbolic quasi-median graph $X$, if an element $g \in G$ skewers
clearly commute: each $ \mathrm{Aut}(Z_i)$ is abelian so that $ \mathrm{Loc}(C_n, \mathcal{G})$ is abelian as well. Thus, we have testify that the centraliser of any chemical element of $ \mathrm{Inn}(G_n) \rtimes \mathrm{Loc}(C_n, \mathcal{G})$ contains a free abelian group of infinite rank. consequently, $ \mathrm{Inn}(G_n) \rtimes \mathrm{Loc}(C_n, \mathcal{G})$ (and a fortiori $ \mathrm{Aut}(G_n)$) cannot be acylindrically hyperbolic according to [ @OsinAcyl Corollary   6.9 ]. 

 In this section, it was more convenient to cultivate with a CAT(0) cube complex preferably than with a quasi - median graph because results already available in the literature allow us to shorten the arguments. However, we emphasize that a quasi - median proof is possible. The chief steps are the followings. First, as in Lemma \[prop: extendT\ ], the legal action $ \Gamma \mathcal{G } \curvearrowright X(\Gamma, \mathcal{G})$ extends to an action $ \mathrm{Aut}(\Gamma \mathcal{G }) \curvearrowright X(\Gamma, \mathcal{G})$ via $ \iota(g) \varphi \cdot x = g \varphi(x)$ where $ x \in X(\Gamma, \mathcal{G})$ is a vertex. So Theorem \[thm: noT\ ] besides follows since Niblo and Roller ’s argumentation [ @MR1459140 ] can be reproduced almost word for discussion in the quasi - median setting; or alternatively, the theorem follows from the combination of [ @MR1459140 ] with [ @Qm Proposition 4.16 ] which shows that any quasi - median graph accommodate a “ dual ” CAT(0) cube complex. Next, in order to prove Theorem \[thm: acyl\_hyp\ ], we need to notice that $ X(\Gamma, \mathcal{G})$ is hyperbolic (as a consequence of [ @Qm Fact 8.33 ]) and that the element $ g$ constructed in the proof above sour out to be a WPD element. For the latter observation, one can well rise the follow criterion by following the argumentation of [ @MoiAcylHyp Theorem 18 ]: given a group $ G$ acting on a hyperbolic quasi - median graph $ X$, if an element $ gravitational constant \in G$ skewers
 clfarly commute: each $\mathro{Aut}(Z_i)$ is abelicb so tiat $\matgrm{Loc}(C_n, \mathcal{G})$ is abelian as well. Tyus, wt have proved that ghe centrwliser od anb element of $\matidm{Inn}(G_n) \rtimea \matkrn{Loc}(C_n, \mathcal{N})$ contains d free abelian gfobp of infinite rank. Therefore, $\mathrm{Ynn}(G_n) \ryiles \mathrm{Loc}(C_g, \mauhcwl{G})$ (znd a fortiori $\mathrm{Aut}(G_n)$) cannot ge acylpndrically hyperbplic according to [@OsinAcyl Corlllary 6.9].

In this sectlon, it was nore xonvenient tu work with a CAT(0) cube complex rather than with a quari-mednan graph bgequsf results alceady wvailable in the litarature allowed us to shmrtwn the arguments. Howeter, we emphasize thaj a quasi-madnan proof is possible. Tye mahn sdeps qre tht fplmowingd. Fmrst, as in Memma \[prop:eztendT\], the action $\Gsmiq \mathcal{G} \cudvearrjwwight X(\Gamma, \mathcal{G})$ extends to an actpon $\jathrm{Aut}(\Gamma \mathcal{G}) \curvearrowright X(\Gamla, \mathcaj{G})$ via $\iota(g) \varphi \cdot x = g \varphi(x)$ where $x \in F(\Gamme, \oatkgwu{T})$ ls a vertex. So Theorem \[thm:noT\] also follows sigde Npblo and Roller’s crgument [@MR1459140] can ne rrkroduced almosj word ykr word in the quasi-ledian fettibg; or alttrnatovely, the theorem follows feom the combpnatuon of [@MR1459140] with [@Qm 'roposition 4.16] whivh shpws that any quasi-mediau grapg admits a “fual” CAT(0) djbe complex. Next, in osder to kfove Theorem \[thm:asyl\_hyp\], we neeb to notkce jhat $X(\Gwmma, \mathcwl{G})$ is hyperbolic (as a clnseqoence mf [@Qm Fact 8.33]) and that the element $g$ constrnrted in the ptoox atove turus out to be a WPD qlement. For thg latter jbserxation, one can eavily prove ehe following friterion by followigg tye aegumentr of [@MoiAcylHyp Theorem 18]: given a geoup $G$ acting on a hykedbolic quasi-medncn graph $X$, if an rleoene $h \mn G$ fnewers
clearly commute: each $\mathrm{Aut}(Z_i)$ is abelian so \mathcal{G})$ abelian as Thus, we have any of $\mathrm{Inn}(G_n) \rtimes \mathcal{G})$ contains a abelian group of infinite rank. Therefore, \rtimes \mathrm{Loc}(C_n, \mathcal{G})$ (and a fortiori $\mathrm{Aut}(G_n)$) cannot be acylindrically hyperbolic according to Corollary 6.9]. In this section, it was more convenient to work with a cube rather with quasi-median graph because results already available in the literature allowed us to shorten the arguments. However, emphasize that a quasi-median proof is possible. The steps are the followings. as in Lemma \[prop:extendT\], the $\Gamma \curvearrowright X(\Gamma, extends an $\mathrm{Aut}(\Gamma \mathcal{G}) \curvearrowright \mathcal{G})$ via $\iota(g) \varphi \cdot x = g \varphi(x)$ where $x \in X(\Gamma, \mathcal{G})$ is a vertex. Theorem \[thm:noT\] since Niblo Roller’s [@MR1459140] be reproduced almost word in the quasi-median setting; or follows from the combination of [@MR1459140] with [@Qm 4.16] which that any quasi-median graph admits a CAT(0) cube complex. Next, in order to prove \[thm:acyl\_hyp\], we need to notice that $X(\Gamma, \mathcal{G})$ is hyperbolic (as a consequence of [@Qm and that the element constructed in the above out be WPD element. the latter observation, one can easily prove the following criterion by the arguments of [@MoiAcylHyp Theorem 18]: given a group $G$ a quasi-median graph $X$, an element $g \in skewers
 clearly commute: each $\mathrm{AUt}(Z_i)$ is abelIan so ThaT $\maThRm{LoC}(C_n, \mAthcal{G})$ is abeliAN as wEll. Thus, we have proved thaT the cEnTRaliSEr Of any Element OF $\mATHrm{inN}(G_N) \rtImES \mAthrm{loc}(c_n, \mathcAl{G})$ containS a fReE abelian grouP Of Infinite raNk. THerefore, $\mathRm{INn}(G_n) \rtImEs \mAThrm{LOc}(C_N, \mathCal{G})$ (anD A fortiOri $\mathrm{auT}(g_n)$) cannOT be acylINDrIcalLy hyperbolic accorDInG To [@OsinAcyl CoroLlary 6.9].

IN tHIs SECtiOn, iT was more coNvEnienT To work wITh A cat(0) cuBE complex ratheR than with a qUAsi-Median GrAph BEcause ResulTs ALreAdy availablE in tHe literatUre allOWed us to SHorten tHe arguMenTs. HOwevER, wE eMphAsIZe tHAt A quASi-mEdian proOf Is PossiBle. THE MAIn stEps Are tHe folLowings. First, aS in lemmA \[ProP:exteNdT\], thE actIoN $\GammA \mathcAl{G} \cuRvEarrowright X(\GamMa, \maThcal{G})$ extEndS tO an AcTion $\mAThrm{AuT}(\GaMma \Mathcal{g}) \curveaRRowRiGHT x(\GAmma, \mathcal{G})$ via $\iotA(g) \VARpHi \cdot x = g \Varphi(X)$ WhErE $X \in X(\GammA, \mAthCal{G})$ IS A vertEx. So tHeOrem \[thm:nOT\] also FOlLoWs since niBlo and roLleR’s aRgumeNT [@MR1459140] cAn be reProduced AlmosT Word for word in tHE quasi-median sETtING; oR AlteRnaTively, the thEoreM FollOws fROm The COmbinAtion Of [@mr1459140] wITh [@Qm Proposition 4.16] whicH sHows thAt any Quasi-median grAph admits a “DUAL” CAT(0) cube CompLEx. nExt, in order to prOve ThEorem \[thm:acYL\_hyp\], we neEd to nOtice thaT $X(\Gamma, \maTHCal{G})$ is hyPerBolIc (aS a cONSeQuence of [@Qm FacT 8.33]) ANd thAt The elemEnt $G$ constrUctEd iN thE prOoF above turNs out to bE a wPd eLeMenT. For tHE latter oBsErvAtIon, One caN Easily Prove The fOlLoWIng CriteriON bY FOlloWiNg The aRguMeNts of [@moiACYlHYp TheorEm 18]: given a gRouP $g$ actInG oN a hyperBolic quasi-medIaN graph $X$, if aN eLemEnt $g \in g$ SKewers
 clearly commute: each $\m athrm{Aut} (Z_i) $ i s a be lian  sothat $\mathrm{ L oc}( C_n, \mathcal{G})$ isabeli an as w e ll . Thu s, we h a ve p rov ed  t hat  t h ecentr ali ser ofany elemen t o f$\mathrm{Inn } (G _n) \rtime s \ mathrm{Loc}( C_n , \mat hc al{ G })$ c ont ainsa free abelia n group o fi nfinit e  rank.T h er efor e, $\mathrm{Inn}( G _n )  \rtimes \math rm{Loc }( C _n , \ma thc al{G})$ (a nd  a fo r tiori $ \ ma t h r m{A u t}(G_n)$) can not be acyl i ndr ically  h ype r bolicaccor di n g t o [@OsinAcy l Co rollary 6 .9].
I n thiss ection,  it wa s m ore  con v en ie ntto wor k  w ith a C AT(0) cu be  c omple x ra t h e r  tha n w itha qua si-median gra phbeca u seresul ts al read yavail able i n the  l iterature allow ed u s to shor ten  t hear gumen t s. How eve r,we emph asize t h ataq u a si -median proof is p os s i bl e. The m ain st e ps  a r e the fo ll owi ngs. F irst,  asi nLemma \[ prop:e x te nd T\], th eaction  $ \Ga mma  \mat h cal{ G} \cu rvearrow right X(\Gamma, \mat h cal{G})$ exte n ds t oa n ac tio n $\mathrm{ Aut} ( \Gam ma \ m at hca l {G})\curv ea r ro w right X(\Gamma, \ma th cal{G} )$ vi a $\iota(g) \ varphi \cd o t x = g \v arph i (x ) $ where $x \in  X(\G amma, \mat h cal{G})$  is a  vertex.  So Theor e m  \[thm:n oT\ ] a lso  fo l l ow s since Niblo a nd R ol ler’s a rgu ment [@ MR1 459 140 ] c an  be repro duced al mo st  w or d f or wo r d in the  q uas i- med ian s e tting;  or a lter na ti v ely , the t h eo r e m fo ll ow s fr omth e com bina t ion  of [@M R1459140]  wi t h [@ Qm  P roposit ion 4.16] whi ch  shows tha tany  quasi - m edian gr aph admits a “dual” CAT ( 0) cube  co mplex . Ne xt, in or der  to pr ove Theore m \[th m:acy l\ _hy p \ ], we n ee d t onotice tha t $X( \Gamm a,  \ma thcal{G })$ is hyperbolic( asa consequence  of  [@Q m Fa ct8 .3 3 ])an d  th a t  the element $g $ construc te d  i n the proo f  ab ov e turns  out to  be a WPD ele ment. For  the latt er  obs e r vat ion, one c an easil y prove t h e fol l ow ing c rit erionby  fo llowi ng the arg ument s of [ @M oiAcyl Hyp T he orem 18] : given a group $G$ act ing on  a hy per bolic qua si- m edi an graph$X$,  if an ele men t $ g \in  G$ skewe rs
 clearly_commute: each_$\mathrm{Aut}(Z_i)$ is abelian so_that $\mathrm{Loc}(C_n,_\mathcal{G})$_is abelian_as_well. Thus, we_have proved that_the centraliser of any_element of $\mathrm{Inn}(G_n)_\rtimes_\mathrm{Loc}(C_n, \mathcal{G})$ contains a free abelian group of infinite rank. Therefore, $\mathrm{Inn}(G_n) \rtimes \mathrm{Loc}(C_n,_\mathcal{G})$_(and a_fortiori_$\mathrm{Aut}(G_n)$)_cannot be acylindrically hyperbolic according_to [@OsinAcyl Corollary 6.9].

In this section,_it was_more convenient to work with a CAT(0) cube_complex_rather than with_a quasi-median graph because results already available in the_literature allowed us to shorten the_arguments. However, we_emphasize_that_a quasi-median proof is_possible. The main steps are the_followings. First, as in Lemma \[prop:extendT\],_the action $\Gamma \mathcal{G} \curvearrowright X(\Gamma, \mathcal{G})$_extends to an action $\mathrm{Aut}(\Gamma \mathcal{G})_\curvearrowright X(\Gamma, \mathcal{G})$ via $\iota(g)_\varphi \cdot_x = g \varphi(x)$ where_$x \in X(\Gamma,_\mathcal{G})$ is_a vertex. So_Theorem \[thm:noT\] also follows since Niblo_and Roller’s argument_[@MR1459140] can be reproduced almost word_for_word in the_quasi-median_setting;_or alternatively,_the theorem follows_from_the combination_of_[@MR1459140] with [@Qm Proposition 4.16] which_shows_that any quasi-median graph admits a “dual”_CAT(0) cube complex. Next,_in_order to prove Theorem_\[thm:acyl\_hyp\], we need to notice_that $X(\Gamma, \mathcal{G})$ is hyperbolic (as_a consequence_of [@Qm_Fact 8.33]) and that the element $g$ constructed in the proof_above turns out to be a_WPD element. For the_latter observation,_one_can easily prove_the_following criterion_by following the arguments of [@MoiAcylHyp Theorem_18]: given_a group $G$ acting on a_hyperbolic quasi-median graph $X$,_if_an element $g \in G$ skewers