columnwidth"}![Estimation performance of input APs of the PÉGASE models. For each of the APs we plot the predicted vs. true AP values for the test set. The blue line indicates the line of perfect estimation, while the red line represents the best linear fitting for the points. The summary errors are given in Table 7.[]{data-label="f02"}](fig70.ps "fig:"){width="0.3\columnwidth"}![Estimation performance of input APs of the PÉGASE models. For each of the APs we plot the predicted vs. true AP values for the test set. The blue line indicates the line of perfect estimation, while the red line represents the best linear fitting for the points. The summary errors are given in Table 7.[]{data-label="f02"}](fig71.ps "fig:"){width="0.3\columnwidth"}\
![Estimation performance of input APs of the PÉGASE models. For each of the APs we plot the predicted vs. true AP values for the test set. The blue line indicates the line of perfect estimation, while the red line represents the best linear fitting for the points. The summary errors are given in Table 7.[]{data-label="f02"}](fig72.ps "fig:"){width="0.3\columnwidth"}![Estimation performance of input APs of the PÉGASE models. For each of the APs we plot the predicted vs. true AP values for the test set. The blue line indicates the line of perfect estimation, while the red line represents the best linear fitting for the points. The summary errors are given in Table 7.[]{data-label="f02"}](fig73.ps "fig:"){width="0.3\columnwidth"}![Estimation performance of input APs of the PÉGASE models. For each of the APs we plot the predicted vs. true AP values for the test set. The blue line indicates the line of perfect estimation, while the red line represents the best linear fitting for the points. The summary errors are given in Table 7.[]{data-label="f02"}](fig74.ps "fig:"){width="0.3\columnwidth"}

From table \[t02\] and figure \[f02\] we see that the results are quite good only for the case of early type galaxies and especially for the $p_1$ parameter. In comparison with the results derived for the synthetic library of galaxy
columnwidth"}![Estimation performance of input APs of the PÉGASE models. For each of the APs we plot the predict vs.   genuine AP values for the test set. The blasphemous line indicates the tune of arrant estimation, while the red line represents the best linear meet for the points. The summary errors are given in Table 7.[]{data - label="f02"}](fig70.ps " fig:"){width="0.3\columnwidth"}![Estimation performance of input APs of the PÉGASE models. For each of the APs we diagram the predicted vs.   true AP values for the examination set. The blue line indicates the argumentation of perfect estimation, while the red line represents the good linear fitting for the points. The summary errors are given in Table 7.[]{data - label="f02"}](fig71.ps " fig:"){width="0.3\columnwidth"}\ 
! [ Estimation operation of input signal APs of the PÉGASE models. For each of the APs we plot the predicted vs.   true AP values for the test set. The blue line bespeak the line of perfect estimate, while the crimson line represents the best linear fit for the points. The summary errors are given in Table 7.[]{data - label="f02"}](fig72.ps " fig:"){width="0.3\columnwidth"}![Estimation performance of stimulation APs of the PÉGASE models. For each of the APs we plot the predicted vs.   true AP values for the test bent. The blue line indicates the line of arrant estimation, while the crimson lineage represents the best linear fitting for the point. The summary errors are given in Table 7.[]{data - label="f02"}](fig73.ps " fig:"){width="0.3\columnwidth"}![Estimation performance of stimulation APs of the PÉGASE models. For each of the APs we plot the predicted vs.   true AP value for the test bent. The blue line bespeak the line of arrant estimation, while the red line represents the good linear fitting for the points. The summary errors are given in Table 7.[]{data - label="f02"}](fig74.ps " fig:"){width="0.3\columnwidth " } 

 From table \[t02\ ] and calculate \[f02\ ] we see that the solution are quite good only for the case of early type galaxies and particularly for the $ p_1 $ parameter. In comparison with the results deduce for the synthetic library of galaxy
colkmnwidth"}![Estimation perfovmance of input CPs of vhe PÉGAAE modelr. For each of the APs we plov thw preeicted vs. true AP valuer for the test ser. Tht blue line indicefes the line kn peryert estimation, wmile the reg line represettr che best linear fitting for the poines. The xulmary errors ate gineg in Nanle 7.[]{data-label="f02"}](fig70.ps "fig:"){width="0.3\colujnwidth"}![Tstimation performsnce of input APs of the PÉHASE models. For each ov the APs wg pljr the predicged vs. true AP values fkr the test set. The blue line ivdicaces the ling kf kerfect estinatiog, while the vvd line represrnts the best kinxar ditting for the pointv. The summary errots are givan in Table 7.[]{data-labwl="d02"}](fig71.pv "fic:"){widgy="0.3\couumhwmdtg"}\
![Estimwtikn performznce of inpyt APs of the PÉGASE mjeels. For each of thq WPs we plot the predicted vs. true AP valles ror the test set. The blye line indicates the line of [erfect estimation, while the red line represents dhe bxsg lnkcar wuthing for the points. The summary errors are gidsn ik Table 7.[]{data-labej="f02"}](fig72.ps "fig:"){eiftn="0.3\solumnwidth"}![Esjimatiou psrformance of inpuh APs os the PÉGASE moqels. For each of the APs we plor the predicned cs. true AP values flr the test set. The nlue line indicates the lins of perfech estimatjun, while the red like sepresenur the best linear fitting hor tke pointr. Thg summawy errors wre gleen in Table 7.[]{data-lwbel="f02"}](yig73.ps "fig:"){width="0.3\cllumnwidth"}![Estimation performancx of input APx mf nhe PÉGASE modeks. For each os the APs we pkot the predkcted vs. trle AP valnes for the eest set. The tpue line indmcates thq libe od perfezg estimation, wnile the geb line represents the best kingad fitting for tkt piints. The summaty drrjrd ere gyeen in Table 7.[]{datx-lacrl="f02"}](fie74.ps "fig:"){widtm="0.3\couumneidth"}

From table \[t02\] ang fifure \[f02\] we see that tme resultw are quyte good only for the case of ewrly vype gelaxiex agd especially for the $p_1$ paramefer. In colpavison with thq rewults deriveb for the synthetic library of galaxy
columnwidth"}![Estimation performance of input APs of the For of the we plot the for test set. The line indicates the of perfect estimation, while the red represents the best linear fitting for the points. The summary errors are given Table 7.[]{data-label="f02"}](fig70.ps "fig:"){width="0.3\columnwidth"}![Estimation performance of input APs of the PÉGASE models. For each the we the vs. true AP values for the test set. The blue line indicates the line of perfect while the red line represents the best linear for the points. The errors are given in Table "fig:"){width="0.3\columnwidth"}\ performance of APs the models. For each the APs we plot the predicted vs. true AP values for the test set. The blue line the line estimation, while red represents best linear fitting points. The summary errors are given "fig:"){width="0.3\columnwidth"}![Estimation performance of input APs of the PÉGASE For each the APs we plot the predicted true AP values for the test set. The line indicates the line of perfect estimation, while the red line represents the best linear the points. The summary are given in 7.[]{data-label="f02"}](fig73.ps performance input of the models. For each of the APs we plot the predicted vs. AP values for the test set. The blue line indicates of estimation, while the line represents the best fitting the points. The summary given Table table and \[f02\] we see that results are quite good only the case of early the $p_1$ parameter. In comparison with the results for the synthetic library of galaxy
columnwidth"}![Estimation perfOrmance of iNput Aps oF thE PéGASe modEls. For each of thE aPs wE plot the predicted vs. truE AP vaLuES for THe Test sEt. The blUE lINE inDiCaTes ThE LiNe of pErfEct estiMation, whilE thE rEd line represENtS the best liNeaR fitting for tHe pOints. THe SumMAry erRorS are gIven in tAble 7.[]{daTa-label="f02"}](fIg70.PS "fig:"){wiDTh="0.3\columNWIdTh"}![EsTimation performanCE oF Input APs of the PéGASE mOdELs. fOR eaCh oF the APs we pLoT the pREdicted VS. tRUE aP vALues for the tesT set. The blue LIne IndicaTeS thE Line of PerfeCt EStiMation, while The rEd line repResentS The best LInear fiTting fOr tHe pOintS. thE sUmmArY ErrORs Are GIveN in Table 7.[]{DaTa-Label="F02"}](fig71.PS "FIG:"){widTh="0.3\cOlumNwidtH"}\
![Estimation peRfoRmanCE of Input aPs of The PéGaSE moDels. FoR each Of The APs we plot the PredIcted vs. trUe Ap vAluEs For thE Test seT. ThE blUe line iNdicateS The LiNE OF pErfect estimation, whIlE THe Red line rEpreseNTs ThE Best lineAr FitTing FOR the pOintS. thE summary Errors ARe GiVen in TaBlE 7.[]{data-lAbEl="f02"}](Fig72.Ps "fig:"){WIdth="0.3\ColumnWidth"}![EstImatiON performance of INput APs of the PégAse MoDEls. FOr eAch of the APs We plOT the PredICtEd vS. True Ap valuEs FOr THe test set. The blue linE iNdicatEs the Line of perfect Estimation, WHILe the red Line REpREsents the best lInear Fitting for THe points. the suMmary errOrs are givEN In Table 7.[]{dAta-LabEl="f02"}](Fig73.PS "FiG:"){width="0.3\columnwIDTh"}![EsTiMation pErfOrmance Of iNpuT APS of ThE PÉGASE moDels. For eAcH oF tHe aPs We ploT The prediCtEd vS. tRue aP valUEs for tHe tesT set. thE bLUe lIne indiCAtES The lInE oF perFecT eStimaTion, WHilE the red Line repreSenTS the BeSt Linear fItting for the pOiNts. The summArY erRors arE GIven in TaBle 7.[]{data-label="f02"}](fig74.ps "fig:"){wiDTh="0.3\columNwiDth"}

FrOm taBle \[t02\] and fiGurE \[f02\] we seE thAT the reSults aRe quiTe GooD ONly foR THe CasE oF early type GALaxIes anD eSpecIally foR the $p_1$ parameter. In coMParIson with the reSulTs deRIVeD foR ThE SynThETic LIBrary of galaxy
columnwidth"}![Estimationperformanc e ofinp utAP s of  the  PÉGASE models .  For  each of the APs we pl ot th ep redi c te d vs.  true A P  v a l ues  f or  th et es t set . T he blue  line indi cat es  the line of pe rfect esti mat ion, while t hered li ne  re p resen tsthe b est li n ear fi tting for  t h e poin t s. Thes u mm aryerrors are giveni nT able 7.[]{data -label =" f 02 " } ](f ig7 0.ps "fig: ") {widt h ="0.3\c o lu m n w idt h "}![Estimatio n performan c e o f inpu tAPs of the  PÉGA SE mod els. For ea ch o f the APs  we pl o t the p r edicted  vs. t rue  AP  val u es  f orth e  te s tset .  Th e blue l in eindic ates t h e  lin e o f pe rfect  estimation,whi le t h e r ed li ne re pres en ts th e best  line ar  fitting for th e po ints. The  su mm ary  e rrors are gi ven  in  Table7.[]{da t a-l ab e l = "f 02"}](fig71.ps "fi g: " ) {w idth="0. 3\colu m nw id t h"}\
![E st ima tion p erfor manc e  o f inputAPs of th ePÉGASEmo dels.Fo r e ach  of t h e AP s we p lot thepredi c ted vs. true A P  values for t h et e st set.  Th e blue line  ind i cate s th e  l ine of pe rfect  e s ti m ation, while the re dline r epres ents the best  linear fi t t i ng for t he p o in t s. The summary  erro rs are giv e n in Tab le 7. []{data- label="f0 2 " }](fig72 .ps  "f ig: "){ w i dt h="0.3\column w i dth" }! [Estima tio n perfo rma nce  of  in pu t APs ofthe PÉGA SE  m od el s.For e a ch of th eAPs  w e p lot t h e pred icted  vs.  t ru e  AP  values fo r thete st  set . T he  blue  lin e  in dicates  the line  of perf ec testimat ion, while th ered line r ep res ents t h e  best li near fitting for the po i nts. Th e s ummar y er rors aregiv en inTab l e 7.[] {data- label =" f02 " } ](fig 7 3 .p s " fi g:"){width = " 0.3 \colu mn widt h"}![Es timation performan c e o f input APs o f t he P É G AS E m o de l s.Fo r  ea c h  of the APs weplot the p re d ic ted vs. tr u e A Pvaluesfor the  test set. Th e blue li ne indica te s th e lin e of perfe ct estim ation, wh i le th e  r ed li nerepres en tsthe b est li n ear  fitt ing fo rthe po ints.  T he summa ry errors are given inTable7.[]{ dat a-label=" f02 " }]( fig74.ps"fig :"){width= "0. 3\c olumn wid t h"}
From ta ble \[t02 \] a n d figure\ [f 02\ ] we  see that t h e res ultsare quitegood  only for the cas e  of early type  gal a x ies  an d  esp ec ially for the$p_ 1$ p arameter .In comparis on withth e  resu lts de rivedfor the s yn t heticlibr ary  of galax y
columnwidth"}![Estimation performance_of input_APs of the PÉGASE_models. For_each_of the_APs_we plot the_predicted vs. true AP_values for the test_set. The blue_line_indicates the line of perfect estimation, while the red line represents the best linear_fitting_for the_points._The_summary errors are given in_Table 7.[]{data-label="f02"}](fig70.ps "fig:"){width="0.3\columnwidth"}![Estimation performance of_input APs_of the PÉGASE models. For each of the_APs_we plot the_predicted vs. true AP values for the test set. The_blue line indicates the line of_perfect estimation, while_the_red_line represents the best_linear fitting for the points. The_summary errors are given in Table_7.[]{data-label="f02"}](fig71.ps "fig:"){width="0.3\columnwidth"}\
![Estimation performance of input APs of_the PÉGASE models. For each of_the APs we plot the_predicted vs. true_AP values for the test_set. The blue_line indicates_the line of_perfect estimation, while the red line_represents the best_linear fitting for the points. The_summary_errors are given_in_Table_7.[]{data-label="f02"}](fig72.ps "fig:"){width="0.3\columnwidth"}![Estimation_performance of input_APs_of the_PÉGASE_models. For each of the APs_we_plot the predicted vs. true AP values for_the test set. The_blue_line indicates the line_of perfect estimation, while the_red line represents the best linear_fitting for_the points._The summary errors are given in Table 7.[]{data-label="f02"}](fig73.ps "fig:"){width="0.3\columnwidth"}![Estimation performance of_input APs of the PÉGASE models._For each of the_APs we_plot_the predicted vs. true_AP_values for_the test set. The blue line indicates_the line_of perfect estimation, while the red_line represents the best_linear_fitting for the points. The summary_errors are given in Table 7.[]{data-label="f02"}](fig74.ps_"fig:"){width="0.3\columnwidth"}

From table \[t02\] and figure_\[f02\]_we_see that the results are_quite good only for the case_of early type_galaxies and especially for the $p_1$ parameter._In_comparison with the results derived for_the_synthetic library of galaxy