 users. Moreover, users can add other users as trustworthy users if they like their reviews. The Epinions dataset is provided by [@tang-etal12b], and CiaoDVD is provided by [@guo2014etaf]. The statistics of the two datasets are shown in Table \[tb-dataset-stat\]. Note that although the datasets include other SIs such as the categories and reviews of items, the only relation that exists between nodes of same type is social relation. Thus, in our experiments, we use meta-paths $\cP_1$ and $\cP_2$ in Figure \[fig-example-hin\](b) to demonstrate the effectiveness of MEMP and omit the statistics of the other SIs in Table \[tb-dataset-stat\].

**Evaluation Metrics.** We choose to tackle the rating prediction task, which is widely used to evaluate CF-based RSs. We choose two evaluation metrics, Mean Absolute Error (MAE) and Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), to evaluate our framework.

**Baselines.** We compare our proposed models with the following RS methods:

-   **RegSVD** [@paterek2007improving]: It is the standard matrix factorization method with $\ell_2$ regularization. We use the implementation in an open source library LibRec [@guo2015librec].

-   **SoReg** [@ma2011recommender]: It is a MF-based method employing social connections as regularization terms. We use the implementation in an open source library LibRec [@guo2015librec].

-   **SocialMF** [@jamali2010matrix]: It is a MF based framework which incorporates social trust propagation. We use an open source library LibRec [@guo2015librec] in the implementation.

-   **FMG** [@zhao2017meta]: It is a state-of-the-art HIN-based RS method adopting the “MF+FM” framework. We use the implementation given by the authors. For this method, we choose the meta-paths $\cP_1$ and $\cP_2$ in Figure \[fig-example-hin\](b) without incorporating motifs.

Note that there are other HIN-based RS methods for rating prediction [@yu2014personalized; @shi2015semantic], but FMG has been shown to be consistently superior [@
users. Moreover, users can add early drug user as trustworthy users if they like their follow-up. The Epinions dataset is provide by   [ @tang - etal12b ], and CiaoDVD is provided by   [ @guo2014etaf ]. The statistics of the two datasets are show in Table   \[tb - dataset - stat\ ]. notice that although the datasets include other SIs such as the categories and reviews of detail, the only relation that exist between node of same type is social relation. Thus, in our experiments, we practice meta - paths $ \cP_1 $ and $ \cP_2 $ in Figure   \[fig - example - hin\](b) to demonstrate the potency of MEMP and omit the statistics of the other SIs in Table   \[tb - dataset - stat\ ]. 

 * * Evaluation Metrics. * * We choose to tackle the evaluation prediction task, which is widely used to evaluate CF - based r. We choose two evaluation metrics, Mean Absolute Error (MAE) and Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), to evaluate our framework. 

 * * Baselines. * * We compare our proposed models with the following RS methods: 

 -    * * RegSVD * *   [ @paterek2007improving ]: It is the standard matrix factorization method with $ \ell_2 $ regularization. We use the implementation in an open source library LibRec   [ @guo2015librec ]. 

 -    * * SoReg * *   [ @ma2011recommender ]: It is a MF - based method employing social connections as regularization terminus. We use the implementation in an candid generator library LibRec   [ @guo2015librec ]. 

 -    * * SocialMF * *   [ @jamali2010matrix ]: It is a MF based framework which incorporates social confidence propagation. We use an open source library LibRec   [ @guo2015librec ] in the execution. 

 -    * * FMG * *   [ @zhao2017meta ]: It is a state - of - the - art HIN - based RS method adopting the “ MF+FM ” framework. We use the implementation given by the authors. For this method, we choose the meta - paths $ \cP_1 $ and $ \cP_2 $ in Figure   \[fig - case - hin\](b) without incorporating motif. 

 Note that there are other HIN - based RS methods for military rank prediction   [ @yu2014personalized; @shi2015semantic ], but FMG has been shown to be consistently superior   [ @
 usfrs. Moreover, users can aad other users cw trusvworthy users iw they like their reviews. Thx Epunionw dataset is provided cy [@tang-etap12b], and CuaoDTD is provided bb [@fuo2014etaf]. The sfwtiscirs of the two dstasets ara shown in Tabne \[gb-bataset-stat\]. Note that although the dwtasets ijclude other SYs slcr as nht categories and reviews of items, the onny relation tnat exists between nodes ov sale type is social gelation. Thoa, ig our experimdnts, we ust keta-paths $\dP_1$ and $\cP_2$ in Figure \[fig-example-hiv\](b) to demonstrajz thf effectivenxss of MEMP and omln the sdatistivs of the othev SIs in Table \[tb-dataset-stat\].

**Eveluation Metrics.** We shoose to tcckle the rating preducrion jask, fhicf is wiseky used ho xvaluate CF-gased RSs. Ww choose two evaluauiog metrics, Mean Absolttq Error (MAE) and Root Mean Square Error (GMSE), to evaluate our framewirk.

**Baselines.** We compate our pro[osed models with the following RS methods:

-   **RegSED** [@patxrdk2007inpvovivt]: Lt is the standard matrix factorization methoq wotm $\ell_2$ regularizabion. We use the imllfmrgtation in an open soudce library LibRec [@huo2015librgc].

-   **SiReg** [@ma2011recjmmemder]: It is a MF-based method employing sjxial connections ad regularizction jerms. Ee use the implementatiun ih an open slurce libdxry LibRec [@guo2015libfec].

-   **SocialMF** [@jamali2010matrix]: It if a MF bawed yramewory whoch insorporates social trust propagatioj. We ose an open sourfe library LibRec [@guo2015librec] in tix implementatoot.

-   **FMG** [@zhao2017ieta]: Lt is a state-of-ehe-art HIN-baseb RS metkod adupting the “MF+FM” fcamework. We tse the implekgntation givei by the wuthirs. Dor thir method, we chopse the mvtc-paths $\cP_1$ and $\cP_2$ in Figure \[flg-exaolle-hin\](b) without inxorporating motofs.

Votq nhav thewa are other VIN-bxsea RS mdthods for vatkng lrediction [@yu2014personalhzed; @shi2015semantic], but FKG has beeb shown eo be consistrntly superior [@
users. Moreover, users can add other users users they like reviews. The Epinions and is provided by The statistics of two datasets are shown in Table Note that although the datasets include other SIs such as the categories and of items, the only relation that exists between nodes of same type is relation. in experiments, use meta-paths $\cP_1$ and $\cP_2$ in Figure \[fig-example-hin\](b) to demonstrate the effectiveness of MEMP and omit statistics of the other SIs in Table \[tb-dataset-stat\]. Metrics.** We choose to the rating prediction task, which widely to evaluate RSs. choose evaluation metrics, Mean Error (MAE) and Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), to evaluate our framework. **Baselines.** We compare our proposed with the methods: - [@paterek2007improving]: is standard matrix factorization $\ell_2$ regularization. We use the implementation source library LibRec [@guo2015librec]. - **SoReg** [@ma2011recommender]: It a MF-based employing social connections as regularization terms. use the implementation in an open source library [@guo2015librec]. - **SocialMF** [@jamali2010matrix]: It is a MF based framework which incorporates social trust propagation. an open source library [@guo2015librec] in the - [@zhao2017meta]: is state-of-the-art HIN-based method adopting the “MF+FM” framework. We use the implementation given by authors. For this method, we choose the meta-paths $\cP_1$ and Figure without incorporating motifs. that there are other RS for rating prediction [@yu2014personalized; FMG been consistently [@
 users. Moreover, users can add oTher users aS trusTwoRthY uSers If thEy like their revIEws. THe Epinions dataset is proVided By [@TAng-eTAl12B], and CIaoDVD iS PrOVIdeD bY [@gUo2014eTaF]. thE statIstIcs of thE two dataseTs aRe Shown in Table \[TB-dAtaset-stat\]. notE that althougH thE datasEtS inCLude oTheR SIs sUch as tHE categOries and rEvIEws of iTEms, the oNLY rElatIon that exists betwEEn NOdes of same type Is sociAl RElATIon. thuS, in our expeRiMents, WE use metA-PaTHS $\CP_1$ aND $\cP_2$ in Figure \[fiG-example-hin\](B) To dEmonstRaTe tHE effecTivenEsS Of MeMP and omit tHe stAtistics oF the otHEr SIs in tAble \[tb-dAtaset-StaT\].

**EvAluaTIoN MEtrIcS.** we cHOoSe tO TacKle the raTiNg PrediCtioN TASK, whiCh iS widEly usEd to evaluate Cf-baSed RsS. We ChoosE two eValuAtIon meTrics, MEan AbSoLute Error (MAE) and root mean SquarE ErRoR (RMsE), To evaLUate ouR frAmeWork.

**BasElines.** WE ComPaRE OUr Proposed models with ThE FOlLowing RS MethodS:

-   **reGSvd** [@paterek2007ImProVing]: iT Is the StanDArD matrix fActoriZAtIoN method WiTh $\ell_2$ rEgUlaRizAtion. wE use The impLementatIon in AN open source libRAry LibRec [@guo2015lIBrEC].

-   **sorEg** [@ma2011RecOmmender]: It iS a MF-BAsed MethOD eMplOYing sOcial CoNNeCTions as regularizatiOn Terms. WE use tHe implementatIon in an opeN SOUrce librAry LIBREC [@guo2015librec].

-   **SociAlMF** [@jAmali2010matriX]: it is a MF bAsed fRamework Which incoRPOrates soCiaL trUst ProPAGaTion. We use an opEN SourCe Library librec [@guo2015lIbrEc] iN thE imPlEmentatioN.

-   **FMG** [@zhao2017MeTa]: it Is A stAte-of-THe-art HIN-BaSed rS MetHod adOPting tHe “MF+Fm” fraMeWoRK. We Use the iMPlEMEntaTiOn GiveN by ThE authOrs. FOR thIs methoD, we choose The MEta-pAtHs $\CP_1$ and $\cP_2$ In Figure \[fig-exAmPle-hin\](b) witHoUt iNcorpoRATing motiFs.

Note that there are other hiN-based rS mEthodS for Rating preDicTion [@yu2014PerSOnalizEd; @shi2015sEmantIc], But fmg has bEEN sHowN tO be consistENTly SuperIoR [@
 users. Moreover, users ca n add othe r use rsastr ustw orth y users if the y  lik e their reviews. The E pinio ns data s et  is p rovided by [ @ta ng -e tal 12 b ],  andCia oDVD is  providedby[@ guo2014etaf] .  T he statist ics  of the twodat asetsar e s h own i n T able\[tb-d a taset- stat\]. N ot e  thata lthough t he  dat asets include oth e rS Is such as the  categ or i es a ndrev iews of it em s, th e  only r e la t i o n t h at exists bet ween nodeso f s ame ty pe  is social  rela ti o n.Thus, in ou r ex periments , we u s e meta- p aths $\ cP_1$and  $\ cP_2 $  i nFig ur e  \[ f ig -ex a mpl e-hin\]( b)  t o dem onst r a t e  the  ef fect ivene ss of MEMP an d o mitt hestati stics  ofth e oth er SIs  in T ab le \[tb-dataset -sta t\].

**E val ua tio nMetri c s.** W e c hoo se to t ackle t h e r at i n g  p rediction task, wh ic h is  widelyused t o  e va l uate CF- ba sed  RSs . We ch oose tw o evalua tion m e tr ic s, Mean  A bsolut eErr or(MAE) andRoot M ean Squa re Er r or (RMSE), toe valuate our f r am e w or k .

* *Ba selines.**We c o mpar e ou r  p rop o sed m odels  w i th the following RS me th ods:
-   * *RegSVD** [@p aterek2007 i m p roving]:  Iti st he standard ma trixfactorizat i on metho d wit h $\ell_ 2$ regula r i zation.Weuse  th e i m p le mentation ina n  ope nsourcelib rary Li bRe c [ @gu o20 15 librec].
-   **S oR eg **  [ @ma 2011r e commende r] : I tisa MF- b ased m ethod  emp lo yi n g s ocial c o nn e c tion sas  reg ula ri zatio n te r ms.  We use  the impl eme n tati on  i n an op en source lib ra ry LibRec[@ guo 2015li b r ec].

-  **SocialMF** [@jamali 2 010matr ix] : Itis a  MF based  fr amewor k w h ich in corpor atesso cia l trust p ro pag at ion. We us e anopenso urce  librar y LibRec [@guo2015 l ibr ec] in the im ple ment a t io n.- ** FM G **[ @ zhao2017meta]:It is a st at e -o f-the-artH IN- ba sed RSmethodadopt i ng the“MF+FM” f ramework.  W e us e the  implement ation gi ven by th e  auth o rs . For  th is met ho d,we ch oose t h e m eta-p aths $ \c P_1$ a nd $\ cP _2$ in F igure \[fig-example-hin \](b)witho utincorpora tin g  mo tifs.

No te t hat thereare  ot her H IN- b asedRS m e th ods for r atin g  predicti o n[@y u 2 01 4personaliz e d ;  @s hi201 5se m antic] , bu t FMG has been sh o wn to be consi sten t l y s upe r ior[@ 
 users._Moreover, users_can add other users_as trustworthy_users_if they_like_their reviews. The_Epinions dataset is_provided by [@tang-etal12b], and CiaoDVD_is provided by [@guo2014etaf]._The_statistics of the two datasets are shown in Table \[tb-dataset-stat\]. Note that although the datasets_include_other SIs_such_as_the categories and reviews of_items, the only relation that_exists between_nodes of same type is social relation. Thus,_in_our experiments, we_use meta-paths $\cP_1$ and $\cP_2$ in Figure \[fig-example-hin\](b) to demonstrate_the effectiveness of MEMP and omit_the statistics of_the_other_SIs in Table \[tb-dataset-stat\].

**Evaluation Metrics.**_We choose to tackle the rating_prediction task, which is widely used_to evaluate CF-based RSs. We choose two_evaluation metrics, Mean Absolute Error (MAE)_and Root Mean Square Error_(RMSE), to_evaluate our framework.

**Baselines.** We compare_our proposed models_with the_following RS methods:

-_  **RegSVD** [@paterek2007improving]: It is the_standard matrix factorization_method with $\ell_2$ regularization. We use_the_implementation in an_open_source_library LibRec [@guo2015librec].

-_  **SoReg** [@ma2011recommender]:_It_is a_MF-based_method employing social connections as regularization_terms._We use the implementation in an open_source library LibRec [@guo2015librec].

- __**SocialMF** [@jamali2010matrix]: It is a_MF based framework which incorporates_social trust propagation. We use an_open source_library LibRec [@guo2015librec]_in the implementation.

-   **FMG** [@zhao2017meta]: It is a state-of-the-art HIN-based_RS method adopting the “MF+FM” framework._We use the implementation_given by_the_authors. For this_method,_we choose_the meta-paths $\cP_1$ and $\cP_2$ in Figure \[fig-example-hin\](b)_without incorporating_motifs.

Note that there are other HIN-based_RS methods for rating_prediction [@yu2014personalized;_@shi2015semantic], but FMG has been shown_to be consistently superior [@