 further out in the stellar atmosphere (see below). We restricted $\log \tau_{\rm c} < -2$ since for larger values of $\tau_{\rm c}$ the outer boundary is placed in a region where the temperature gradient starts to become significant and the periods of all modes become dependent of $\tau_{\rm c}$.

It is clear that the periods of the normal modes are independent of $\log \tau_{\rm c}$ i.e. they are independent of the placement of the stellar surface. For the strange modes, the periods vary markedly with $\log \tau_{\rm c}$. This is consistent with the fact that the strange modes are predominantly surface modes largely confined to the region between the hydrogen ionization zone and the stellar surface [@buc97; @sai98]. The reason that the periods of the strange modes increase as the outer boundary is placed at larger radii is that the ratio $z_0$ of the radius of the hydrogen ionization zone to the stellar surface decreases. As shown in the toy models of @buc97 (see their Figure 13), decreasing $z_0$ causes the strange mode period to increase relative to the normal mode periods. Note also that it is the decrease in $z_0$ with luminosity in the sequence of 1.6M$_{\odot}$ models shown in Figure \[nonad\_p+gr-logl\] that causes the strange mode periods to increase faster with luminosity than the normal mode periods.

The strange modes in Figure \[nonad\_p+gr-tau\] all have lower growth rates (larger damping rates) than the normal modes. They also cross the periods of the normal modes and in each case it can be seen that mode interaction influences the growth rate as the modes come in and out of resonance.

The top panel of Figure \[eigfn\] shows the outer structure of a typical luminous red giant from the centre to the surface for two placements of the outer boundary, corresponding to $\log \tau_{\rm c} = -3$ and $\log \tau_{\rm c} = -8$. The model with $\log \tau_{\rm c} = -8$ has a considerably larger surface radius than the model with $\log
\tau_{\rm c} = -3$. The physical structure of the two models is essentially indistinguishable at common radii.

The eigenfunctions of the radius perturbation for the 4 lowest order modes are shown in the bottom panel of Figure \[eigfn\]
further out in the stellar atmosphere (visualize downstairs). We restricted $ \log \tau_{\rm c } < -2 $ since for larger values of $ \tau_{\rm c}$ the extinct boundary is placed in a area where the temperature gradient starts to become significant and the periods of all manner become dependent of $ \tau_{\rm c}$. 

 It is clear that the period of the normal modes are independent of $ \log \tau_{\rm c}$ i they are independent of the placement of the stellar surface. For the strange modes, the periods vary markedly with $ \log \tau_{\rm c}$. This is reproducible with the fact that the strange modes are predominantly surface mood largely confined to the region between the hydrogen ionization zone and the stellar surface [ @buc97; @sai98 ]. The rationality that the periods of the strange modes increase as the outer limit is placed at larger radii is that the ratio $ z_0 $ of the radius of the hydrogen ionization zone to the stellar open decreases. As shown in the toy models of @buc97 (see their Figure 13), decreasing $ z_0 $ causes the strange mode time period to increase relative to the normal mode period. Note also that it is the decrease in $ z_0 $ with luminosity in the sequence of 1.6M$_{\odot}$ models indicate in Figure   \[nonad\_p+gr - logl\ ] that causes the strange mode period to increase faster with luminosity than the normal mode periods. 

 The strange modes in Figure   \[nonad\_p+gr - tau\ ] all get lower growth rates (larger damping rates) than the normal mode. They also cross the periods of the normal modes and in each case it can be watch that mode interaction influences the growth pace as the modes issue forth in and out of resonance. 

 The top panel of Figure   \[eigfn\ ] show the outer social organization of a typical luminous red giant from the centre to the open for two placements of the out boundary, correspond to $ \log \tau_{\rm c } = -3 $ and $ \log \tau_{\rm c } = -8$. The model with $ \log \tau_{\rm c } = -8 $ has a well larger surface radius than the model with $ \log 
 \tau_{\rm c } = -3$. The physical structure of the two models is essentially indistinguishable at common radii. 

 The eigenfunctions of the radius disturbance for the 4 lowest order manner are shown in the bottom panel of Figure   \[eigfn\ ]
 fugther out in the stellar atmosphere (see below). Xe restdicted $\lug \tau_{\rm c} < -2$ since for largec vaoues if $\tau_{\rm c}$ the outer buundary id placed in e region where tis tempevcture nradiznv starts to becpme signifhcant and the [efilds of all modes become dependent os $\tau_{\rm c}$.

Lt is clear thwt tnq pedpobs of the normal modes are indelendent of $\log \tau_{\rm c}$ i.e. they are independent of hhe placement of tje stellar wurfwxe. For the sgrange modts, the perioss vary markedly with $\log \tau_{\rm c}$. Thns is consiwtwnt fith the fart than the strange modes ase predpminantly surfsce moees largely confined vo the region betweeg the hydsoyen ionization zone abd the vtelnar ryrfxce [@bnc97; @aai98]. Thf rxason that fhe periods of the strange modts ybcrease as ths outew foundary is placed at larger radii is tvat the ratio $z_0$ of the raduus of the hydrogen ilnization zone to the stellar surface decreases. As shown it the goy mjawld of @buc97 (see their Figure 13), decreasing $z_0$ causef tne strange mode ieriod to increase rflsjive to the notmal mobs leriods. Note also hhat it is tye decreafe im $z_0$ with luminosity in the wequence of 1.6I$_{\idot}$ models shown nn Figure \[noncd\_p+gr-lpgl\] tnat causes the strange oode periods to increase waster with lumivospty dhan the normal mode perioqs.

The strenge kodes iv Fibure \[nogad\_p+gr-tau\] wll have lower growth rahes (lcrger damping rwtes) than the normal modes. They also cross thg parimds of tke norkal modes and in each case nt can bz seen that mode interartion influegces the growdj rate as thx modes cjme un abd out uw resonance.

The top panel of Figurw \[eigfn\] shows the omter rfructure of a tvkicql luminous red gixnt fgom tra centre to dhe rurwsce fur two kjagemdnts of the outer boundasy, ckrresponding to $\lob \bau_{\rm c} = -3$ and $\log \tau_{\rm c} = -8$. Thr model with $\log \twu_{\rm r} = -8$ har a cpnsyderably larger surface radius than the moqel with $\log
\eau_{\rn c} = -3$. The phvsical structure of the two models is eswentially indistintuishable at common vadii.

The eigxnfunceions of dhe radius perturbatuon for the 4 lowext order modes are shkwn in the hottom panel of Figure \[eigfn\]
further out in the stellar atmosphere (see restricted \tau_{\rm c} -2$ since for the boundary is placed a region where temperature gradient starts to become significant the periods of all modes become dependent of $\tau_{\rm c}$. It is clear the periods of the normal modes are independent of $\log \tau_{\rm c}$ i.e. are of placement the stellar surface. For the strange modes, the periods vary markedly with $\log \tau_{\rm c}$. This consistent with the fact that the strange modes predominantly surface modes largely to the region between the ionization and the surface @sai98]. reason that the of the strange modes increase as the outer boundary is placed at larger radii is that the $z_0$ of of the ionization to stellar surface decreases. in the toy models of @buc97 13), decreasing $z_0$ causes the strange mode period increase relative the normal mode periods. Note also it is the decrease in $z_0$ with luminosity the sequence of 1.6M$_{\odot}$ models shown in Figure \[nonad\_p+gr-logl\] that causes the strange mode periods faster with luminosity than normal mode periods. strange in \[nonad\_p+gr-tau\] have lower rates (larger damping rates) than the normal modes. They also cross periods of the normal modes and in each case it seen mode interaction influences growth rate as the come and out of resonance. panel Figure outer of typical luminous red giant the centre to the surface two placements of the \tau_{\rm c} = -3$ and $\log \tau_{\rm c} -8$. The model with $\log \tau_{\rm c} -8$ has a considerably larger surface radius than the model with $\log c} = physical structure of the two models is essentially at common radii. The of the radius perturbation for the 4 lowest order are in the panel of Figure
 further out in the stellar atmOsphere (see Below). we rEstRiCted $\Log \tAu_{\rm c} < -2$ since for lARger Values of $\tau_{\rm c}$ the outer BoundArY Is plACeD in a rEgion whERe THE teMpErAtuRe GRaDient StaRts to beCome signifIcaNt And the periodS Of All modes beComE dependent of $\Tau_{\Rm c}$.

It iS cLeaR That tHe pEriodS of the NOrmal mOdes are inDePEndent OF $\log \tau_{\RM C}$ i.E. theY are independent of THe PLacement of the sTellar SuRFaCE. for The Strange modEs, The peRIods varY MaRKEDly WIth $\log \tau_{\rm c}$. THis is consisTEnt With thE fAct THat the StranGe MOdeS are predomiNantLy surface Modes lARgely coNFined to The regIon BetWeen THe HyDroGeN IonIZaTioN ZonE and the sTeLlAr surFace [@BUC97; @SAi98]. ThE reAson That tHe periods of thE stRangE ModEs incRease As thE oUter bOundarY is plAcEd at larger radii Is thAt the ratiO $z_0$ oF tHe rAdIus of THe hydrOgeN ioNizatioN zone to THe sTeLLAR sUrface decreases. As sHoWN In The toy moDels of @BUc97 (SeE Their FigUrE 13), deCreaSINg $z_0$ caUses THe Strange mOde perIOd To IncreasE rElativE tO thE noRmal mODe peRiods. NOte also tHat it IS the decrease in $Z_0$ With luminositY In THE sEQuenCe oF 1.6M$_{\odot}$ modelS shoWN in FIgurE \[NoNad\_P+Gr-logL\] that CaUSeS The strange mode perioDs To incrEase fAster with lumiNosity than THE Normal moDe peRIoDS.

The strange modEs in FIgure \[nonad\_P+Gr-tau\] all Have lOwer growTh rates (laRGEr dampinG raTes) ThaN thE NOrMal modes. They aLSO croSs The periOds Of the noRmaL moDes And In Each case iT can be seEn ThAt MoDe iNteraCTion inflUeNceS tHe gRowth RAte as tHe modEs coMe In ANd oUt of resONaNCE.

The ToP pAnel Of FIgUre \[eiGfn\] sHOws The outeR structurE of A TypiCaL lUminous Red giant from tHe Centre to thE sUrfAce for TWO placemeNts of the outer boundary, coRRespondIng To $\log \Tau_{\rM c} = -3$ and $\log \tAu_{\rM c} = -8$. The mOdeL With $\loG \tau_{\rm C} = -8$ has a CoNsiDERably LARgEr sUrFace radius THAn tHe modEl With $\Log
\tau_{\rM c} = -3$. The physical strucTUre Of the two modelS is EsseNTIaLly INdIStiNgUIshABLe at common radii.

the eigenfuNcTIoNs of the radIUs pErTurbatiOn for thE 4 loweST order mOdes are shOwn in the bOtTom pANEl oF Figure \[eigFn\]
 further out in the stella r atmosphe re (s eebel ow ). W e re stricted $\log \tau _{\rm c} < -2$ since f or la rg e r va l ue s of$\tau_{ \ rm c }$th eout er bo undar y i s place d in a reg ion  w here the tem p er ature grad ien t starts tobec ome si gn ifi c ant a ndthe p eriods of all  modes be co m e depe n dent of $ \t au_{ \rm c}$.

It is c l ea r  that the peri ods of  t h en o rma l m odes are i nd epend e nt of $ \ lo g \ tau _ {\rm c}$ i.e.  they are i n dep endent  o f t h e plac ement  o f  th e stellar s urfa ce. For t he str a nge mod e s, theperiod s v ary  mar k ed ly  wi th $\l o g\ta u _{\ rm c}$.Th is  is c onsi s t e n t wi ththefactthat the stra nge  mod e s a re pr edomi nant ly  surf ace mo des l ar gely confined t o th e regionbet we enth e hyd r ogen i oni zat ion zon e and t h e s te l l a rsurface [@buc97; @ sa i 9 8] . The re ason t h at  t h e period softhes t range  mod e sincrease  as th e  o ut er boun da ry ispl ace d a t lar g er r adii i s that t he ra t io $z_0$ of th e  radius of th e  h y d ro g en i oni zation zone  tot he s tell a rsur f ace d ecrea se s .A s shown in the toymo dels o f @bu c97 (see thei r Figure 1 3 ) ,  decreas ing$ z_ 0 $ causes the s trang e mode per i od to in creas e relati ve to the n ormal mo deper iod s.N o te  also that it i s th edecreas e i n $z_0$  wi thlum ino si ty in the  sequenc eof  1 .6 M$_ {\odo t }$ model ssho wn  in  Figu r e \[no nad\_ p+gr -l og l \]that ca u se s thest ra ngemod eperio ds t o  in creasefaster wi thl umin os it y thanthe normal mo de  periods.
T hestrang e modes in  Figure \[nonad\_p+gr-t a u\] all  ha ve lo wergrowth ra tes  (larg erd amping  rates ) tha nthe n ormal m od es.  T hey also c r o ssthe p er iods  of the  normal modes andi n e ach case it c anbe s e e ntha t  m o dein t era c t ion influencesthe growth  r a te  as the mo d esco me in a nd outof re s onance. 

The top  panel of  F igur e \[e igfn\] sho ws the o uter stru c tureo fa typ ica l lumi no usred g iant f r omthe c entreto  the s urfac efor twoplacements of the outer  bound ary,cor respondin g t o  $\ log \tau_ {\rm  c} = -3$and  $\ log \ tau _ {\rmc} = -8 $.T he mo delw ith $\log \t au_ { \ rm  c} = -8$ h a s a c onsid era b ly lar gersurface radius th a n the model wi th $ \ l og\ta u _{\r mc} = -3$. Thephy si c a l struct ur e of the tw o models  i s  esse ntiall y indi stingui s h ab l e at c ommo n r adii.

Th e e ig e nfuncti on so f theradi us  pertu rbatio n  for t he 4 lowest orde r mod e s  ares how n inth e botto m  pan el of Figu re \[eigfn\ ]
 further_out in_the stellar atmosphere (see_below). We_restricted_$\log \tau_{\rm_c}_< -2$ since_for larger values_of $\tau_{\rm c}$ the_outer boundary is_placed_in a region where the temperature gradient starts to become significant and the periods_of_all modes_become_dependent_of $\tau_{\rm c}$.

It is clear_that the periods of the_normal modes_are independent of $\log \tau_{\rm c}$ i.e. they_are_independent of the_placement of the stellar surface. For the strange modes,_the periods vary markedly with $\log_\tau_{\rm c}$. This_is_consistent_with the fact that_the strange modes are predominantly surface_modes largely confined to the region_between the hydrogen ionization zone and the_stellar surface [@buc97; @sai98]. The reason_that the periods of the_strange modes_increase as the outer boundary_is placed at_larger radii_is that the_ratio $z_0$ of the radius of_the hydrogen ionization_zone to the stellar surface decreases._As_shown in the_toy_models_of @buc97_(see their Figure_13),_decreasing $z_0$_causes_the strange mode period to increase_relative_to the normal mode periods. Note also_that it is the_decrease_in $z_0$ with luminosity_in the sequence of 1.6M$_{\odot}$_models shown in Figure \[nonad\_p+gr-logl\] that causes_the strange_mode periods_to increase faster with luminosity than the normal mode periods.

The strange_modes in Figure \[nonad\_p+gr-tau\] all have lower_growth rates (larger damping_rates) than_the_normal modes. They_also_cross the_periods of the normal modes and in_each case_it can be seen that mode_interaction influences the growth_rate_as the modes come in and_out of resonance.

The top panel of_Figure \[eigfn\] shows the outer structure_of_a_typical luminous red giant from_the centre to the surface for_two placements of_the outer boundary, corresponding to $\log \tau_{\rm_c}_= -3$ and $\log \tau_{\rm c}_=_-8$. The model with $\log \tau_{\rm_c}_=_-8$ has a considerably larger_surface radius than the model with_$\log
\tau_{\rm c} = -3$. The physical structure of the_two models is_essentially indistinguishable at common radii.

The_eigenfunctions_of_the radius perturbation for the 4 lowest order modes are_shown in_the bottom panel_of Figure \[eigfn\]