 1$, while modules are indicated by $\tau = 0$. Mixtures correspond to groups with $0 <\tau < 1$. For the rest of the paper, we refer to groups with $\tau\approx 1$ as community-like and groups with $\tau\approx 0$ as module-like.

Groups in networks are revealed by a sequential extraction procedure proposed in [@ZLZ11; @SBB13; @Weiss]. One first finds the group $S$ and its linking pattern $T$ with random-restart hill climbing [@RN03] that maximizes the objective function. Next, the revealed group $S$ is extracted from the network by removing the links between groups $S$ and $T$, and any node that becomes isolated. The procedure is then repeated on the remaining network until the objective function is larger than the $99$th percentile of the values obtained under the same framework in a corresponding Erdős-R[é]{}nyi random graph [@ER59]. All groups reported in the paper are thus statistically significant at $1\%$ level. Note that the above procedure allows for overlapping [@PDFV05], hierarchical [@RSMOB02], nested and other classes of groups.

\[sec:analys\]Analysis and discussion
=====================================

Section \[subsec:nets\] introduces real-world networks considered in the study. Section \[subsec:orig\] reports the node group structure of the original networks extracted with the framework described in Section \[sec:nodegroups\]. The groups extracted from the sampled networks are analyzed in Section \[subsec:sampled\]. For a complete analysis, we also observe the node group structure of a large network with more than a million links in Section \[subsec:large\].

\[subsec:nets\]Network data
---------------------------

[clrr]{} & & &\
*Collab* & High Energy Physics collaborations [@LKF05] & $9877$ & $25998$\
*PGP* & Pretty Good Privacy web-of-trust [@BPDA04] & $10680$ & $24340$\
*P2P* & Gnutella peer-to-peer file sharing [@LKF05] & $8717$ & $31525$\
*Citation* & High Energy Physics citations [@LKF05] & $27770$ & $352807$\

The empirical analysis in the
1 $, while modules are indicated by $ \tau = 0$. Mixtures correspond to group with $ 0 < \tau < 1$. For the remainder of the paper, we refer to groups with $ \tau\approx 1 $ as residential district - like and groups with $ \tau\approx 0 $ as module - like. 

 group in networks are revealed by a consecutive origin procedure proposed in   [ @ZLZ11; @SBB13; @Weiss ]. One foremost finds the group $ S$ and its linking pattern $ T$ with random - restart mound climb   [ @RN03 ] that maximizes the objective affair. Next, the revealed group $ S$ is extracted from the net by removing the links between groups $ S$ and $ T$, and any lymph node that becomes isolated. The procedure is then repeated on the remaining net until the objective function is bombastic than the $ 99$th percentile of the values obtained under the same model in a corresponding Erdős - R[é]{}nyi random graph   [ @ER59 ]. All groups reported in the paper are thus statistically significant at $ 1\%$   horizontal surface. notice that the above procedure allows for overlapping   [ @PDFV05 ], hierarchical   [ @RSMOB02 ], nested and other classes of groups. 

 \[sec: analys\]Analysis and discussion 
 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 

 Section   \[subsec: nets\ ] introduce actual - world net view in the study. Section   \[subsec: orig\ ] report the node group social organization of the original networks extracted with the framework trace in Section   \[sec: nodegroups\ ]. The groups extracted from the sampled networks are analyzed in Section   \[subsec: sampled\ ]. For a complete analysis, we also observe the node group structure of a large net with more than a million links in Section   \[subsec: large\ ]. 

 \[subsec: nets\]Network datum 
 --------------------------- 

 [ clrr ] { } & & & \ 
 * Collab * & High Energy Physics collaborations   [ @LKF05 ] & $ 9877 $ & $ 25998$\ 
 * PGP * & Pretty Good Privacy web - of - trust   [ @BPDA04 ] & $ 10680 $ & $ 24340$\ 
 * P2P * & Gnutella peer - to - peer file sharing   [ @LKF05 ] & $ 8717 $ & $ 31525$\ 
 * Citation * & High Energy Physics citations   [ @LKF05 ] & $ 27770 $ & $ 352807$\ 

 The empiric analysis in the
 1$, wjile modules are indicattd by $\tau = 0$. Mixtutew corrxspond fo groupr with $0 <\tau < 1$. For the rest oh thw paptg, we refer to groups dith $\tau\aiprox 1$ as comnynity-like ehd grouif wifm $\tau\cp'rox 0$ as module-kike.

Groups in networks ase rzvealed by a sequential extraction pwocedurr oroposed in [@ZLZ11; @SBB13; @Reisa]. One first finds the group $S$ and jts linning pattern $Y$ with random-restart hill flimhing [@RN03] that maximixes the objgdtidw function. Ndxt, the renzaled group $S$ is extracted from the networy by xemoving thg mijns between jroups $S$ and $T$, and any noda that necomes isolatcd. Thx pricedure is then repeaved on the remaining network gncil the objective funxtuon iv lasger rhav tge $99$tg percfntmle of the balues obtauned under the same fwqmework in a dorres[ogding Erdős-R[é]{}nyi random graph [@ER59]. All groupv rsported in the paper arw thus statistically dignificagt at $1\%$ level. Note that the above procedure allows xor oteflakplkg [@PDWC05], jierarchical [@RSMOB02], nested and other classes of frpuis.

\[sec:analys\]Analysls and discussion
=====================================

Srchipg \[subsec:nets\] ivtroduess real-world networkd consiqered in the suudy. Xection \[subsec:orig\] reports tye node groui steucture of the oriyinal networys ectracyed with the framework bescriged in Sectlon \[sec:nodseroups\]. The groupr eqtrawted from the sampled netwjrks are enalyved in Sdctipn \[subsqc:sampled\]. Vor a complete analysis, ae aldo observe tje node group structure of a lacje network wijh korv than a iillipn links in Sqction \[subsec:latge\].

\[subsec:uets\]Negwork data
---------------------------

[blrr]{} & & &\
*Conlab* & High Qnergy Physicv collaboratimns [@LKF05] & $9877$ & $25998$\
*PGP* & Peetty Guud Privacy web-pf-trust [@BPBC04] & $10680$ & $24340$\
*P2P* & Tnutella peer-to-peev filg aharing [@LKF05] & $8717$ & $31525$\
*Cnuatuon* & High Energu Pfysycd ritatymns [@LKF05] & $27770$ & $352807$\

Tha emoirkval avalysis in bhe
1$, while modules are indicated by $\tau Mixtures to groups $0 <\tau < the we refer to with $\tau\approx 1$ community-like and groups with $\tau\approx 0$ module-like. Groups in networks are revealed by a sequential extraction procedure proposed in @SBB13; @Weiss]. One first finds the group $S$ and its linking pattern $T$ random-restart climbing that the objective function. Next, the revealed group $S$ is extracted from the network by removing the between groups $S$ and $T$, and any node becomes isolated. The procedure then repeated on the remaining until objective function larger the percentile of the obtained under the same framework in a corresponding Erdős-R[é]{}nyi random graph [@ER59]. All groups reported in the are thus at $1\%$ Note the procedure allows for hierarchical [@RSMOB02], nested and other classes and discussion ===================================== Section \[subsec:nets\] introduces real-world networks in the Section \[subsec:orig\] reports the node group of the original networks extracted with the framework in Section \[sec:nodegroups\]. The groups extracted from the sampled networks are analyzed in Section \[subsec:sampled\]. complete analysis, we also the node group of large with than a links in Section \[subsec:large\]. \[subsec:nets\]Network data --------------------------- [clrr]{} & & &\ & High Energy Physics collaborations [@LKF05] & $9877$ & $25998$\ Pretty Privacy web-of-trust [@BPDA04] $10680$ & $24340$\ *P2P* Gnutella file sharing [@LKF05] & $31525$\ & citations & & $352807$\ The empirical in the
 1$, while modules are indicated bY $\tau = 0$. MixturEs corResPonD tO groUps wIth $0 <\tau < 1$. For the reST of tHe paper, we refer to groups With $\tAu\APproX 1$ As CommuNity-likE AnD GRouPs WiTh $\tAu\APpRox 0$ as ModUle-like.

groups in neTwoRkS are revealed BY a Sequential ExtRaction proceDurE propoSeD in [@zlZ11; @SBB13; @weiSs]. One First fINds the Group $S$ and ItS LinkinG Pattern $t$ WItH ranDom-restart hill cliMBiNG [@RN03] that maximizEs the oBjECtIVE fuNctIon. Next, the ReVealeD Group $S$ iS ExTRACteD From the networK by removing THe lInks beTwEen GRoups $S$ And $T$, aNd ANy nOde that becoMes iSolated. ThE proceDUre is thEN repeatEd on thE reMaiNing NEtWoRk uNtIL thE ObJecTIve Function Is LaRger tHan tHE $99$TH PercEntIle oF the vAlues obtained UndEr thE SamE framEwork In a cOrRespoNding ERdős-R[É]{}nYi random graph [@ER59]. all gRoups repoRteD iN thE pAper aRE thus sTatIstIcally sIgnificANt aT $1\%$ lEVEL. NOte that the above proCeDURe Allows foR overlAPpInG [@pDFV05], hierArChiCal [@RsmoB02], nesTed aND oTher clasSes of gROuPs.

\[Sec:analYs\]analysIs And DisCussiON
=====================================

SecTion \[suBsec:nets\] IntroDUces real-world nETworks consideREd IN ThE StudY. SeCtion \[subsec:Orig\] REporTs thE NoDe gROup stRuctuRe OF tHE original networks exTrActed wIth thE framework desCribed in SeCTIOn \[sec:nodEgroUPs\]. tHe groups extracTed frOm the samplED networkS are aNalyzed iN Section \[sUBSec:samplEd\]. FOr a ComPleTE AnAlysis, we also oBSErve ThE node grOup StructuRe oF a lArgE neTwOrk with moRe than a mIlLiOn LiNks In SecTIon \[subseC:lArgE\].

\[sUbsEc:netS\]networK data
---------------------------

[Clrr]{} & & &\
*coLlAB* & HiGh EnergY phYSIcs cOlLaBoraTioNs [@lKF05] & $9877$ & $25998$\
*PGp* & PreTTy GOod PrivAcy web-of-tRusT [@bPDA04] & $10680$ & $24340$\
*p2P* & gnUtella pEer-to-peer file ShAring [@LKF05] & $8717$ & $31525$\
*CiTaTioN* & High ENERgy PhysiCs citations [@LKF05] & $27770$ & $352807$\

The empiriCAl analySis In the
 1$, while modules are ind icated by$\tau  =0$.  M ixtu rescorrespond tog roup s with $0 <\tau < 1$.For t he rest of  thepaper,w er e fer  t ogro up s  w ith $ \ta u\appro x 1$ as co mmu ni ty-like andg ro ups with $ \ta u\approx 0$asmodule -l ike . 

Gro ups  in n etwork s  are r evealed b ya  seque n tial ex t r ac tion  procedure propos e di n [@ZLZ11; @SB B13; @ We i ss ] .  On e f irst finds  t he gr o up $S$a nd i t s l i nking pattern  $T$ with r a ndo m-rest ar t h i ll cli mbing  [ @ RN0 3] that max imiz es the ob jectiv e  functi o n. Next , therev eal ed g r ou p$S$  i s  ex t ra cte d  fr om the n et wo rk by  rem o v i n g th e l inks  betw een groups $S $ a nd $ T $,and a ny no de t ha t bec omes i solat ed . The procedure  isthen repe ate donth e rem a iningnet wor k until  the ob j ect iv e f un ction is larger th an t he  $99$thpercen t il eo f the va lu esobta i n ed un dert he  same fr amewor k  i na corre sp onding  E rdő s-R [é]{} n yi r andomgraph [@ ER59] .  All groups re p orted in thep ap e r  a r e th usstatistical ly s i gnif ican t  a t $ 1 \%$ l evel.  N o te that the above proc ed ure al lowsfor overlappi ng [@PDFV0 5 ] ,  hierarc hica l  [ @ RSMOB02], nest ed an d other cl a sses ofgroup s.

\[se c:analys\ ] A nalysisand  di scu ssi o n 
= ============= = = ==== == ======= === =====
Sec tio n \ [su bs ec:nets\]  introdu ce sre al -wo rld n e tworks c on sid er edin th e  study . Sec tion  \ [s u bse c:orig\ ]  r e p orts  t he  nod e g ro up st ruct u reof theoriginalnet w orks  e xt ractedwith the fram ew ork descri be d i n Sect i o n \[sec: nodegroups\]. The group s  extrac ted  from  the  samplednet worksare analyz ed inSecti on  \[ s u bsec: s a mp led \] . For a co m p let e ana ly sis,  we als o observe the node gro up structureofa la r g enet w or k  wi th mor e than a millionlinks in S ec t io n \[subsec : lar ge \].

\[ subsec: nets\ ] Network  data
--- --------- -- ---- - - --- ----

[clr r]{} & &  &\
*Coll a b* &H ig h Ene rgy  Physi cs  co llabo ration s  [@ LKF05 ] & $9 87 7$ & $ 25998 $\ 
*PGP* &  Pretty Good Privacy we b-of-t rust[@B PDA04] &$10 6 80$  & $24340 $\
* P2P* & Gnu tel lapeer- to- p eer f iles ha rin g  [@LK F05] & $8717$&  $ 315 2 5 $\ 
*Citation* & Hig h Ene rgy Physic s ci tations [@LKF05]&  $27770$ & $35 2807 $ \ 

T hee mpir ic al analysis in  th e
 1$,_while modules_are indicated by $\tau_= 0$._Mixtures_correspond to_groups_with $0 <\tau_< 1$. For_the rest of the_paper, we refer_to_groups with $\tau\approx 1$ as community-like and groups with $\tau\approx 0$ as module-like.

Groups in_networks_are revealed_by_a_sequential extraction procedure proposed in [@ZLZ11;_@SBB13; @Weiss]. One first finds_the group_$S$ and its linking pattern $T$ with random-restart_hill_climbing [@RN03] that maximizes_the objective function. Next, the revealed group $S$ is_extracted from the network by removing_the links between_groups_$S$_and $T$, and any_node that becomes isolated. The procedure_is then repeated on the remaining_network until the objective function is larger_than the $99$th percentile of the_values obtained under the same_framework in_a corresponding Erdős-R[é]{}nyi random graph [@ER59]._All groups reported_in the_paper are thus_statistically significant at $1\%$ level. Note that_the above procedure_allows for overlapping [@PDFV05], hierarchical [@RSMOB02], nested and_other_classes of groups.

\[sec:analys\]Analysis_and_discussion
=====================================

Section \[subsec:nets\]_introduces real-world_networks considered in_the_study. Section \[subsec:orig\]_reports_the node group structure of the_original_networks extracted with the framework described in_Section \[sec:nodegroups\]. The groups extracted_from_the sampled networks are_analyzed in Section \[subsec:sampled\]. For a_complete analysis, we also observe the_node group_structure of_a large network with more than a million links in Section \[subsec:large\].

\[subsec:nets\]Network_data
---------------------------

[clrr]{} & & &\
*Collab* & High_Energy Physics collaborations [@LKF05] &_$9877$ &_$25998$\
*PGP*_& Pretty Good_Privacy_web-of-trust [@BPDA04] &_$10680$ & $24340$\
*P2P* & Gnutella peer-to-peer file_sharing [@LKF05] &_$8717$ & $31525$\
*Citation* & High Energy_Physics citations [@LKF05] & $27770$_&_$352807$\

The empirical analysis in the