M_\odot$. By extrapolating the $\alpha=-1.33$ IMF from $M=0.15M_\odot$ all the way down to zero mass, we obtain $123.5 M_\odot$ of unseen dwarfs, thus totaling $440.5 M_\odot$ in living stars and brown dwarfs. To account for the remnants we need to adopt an initial mass-final mass relation. We used the semi-empirical relation proposed by Renzini & Ciotti (1993), with white dwarf remnants of mass $M_{\rm
WD}=0.48+0.077\,M_{\rm i}$ for initial masses $M_{\rm i}\le 8\,\msun$, neutron star remnants of $1.4\,\msun$ for $8\le M_{\rm i}\le
40\,\msun$, and black holes remnants of mass $0.5\,M_{\rm i}$ for $M_{\rm i}>40\,\msun$. Since the present data do not give any constraint on the slope of the IMF for $M\gsim 1\,\msun$, we explore the effect on the total mass of various plausible assumptions:

-   IMF \#1: An IMF with slope $\alpha=-1.33$, like the one we observed, all the way to $100M_\odot$. This is perhaps an extreme possibility, since all the determinations of the IMF in this mass range give steeper values (see Scalo 1998 for a recent review), and even our own IMF may steepen for $M>0.5M_\odot$.

-   IMF \#2: An IMF with slope $\alpha=-1.33$ up to $M=1M_\odot$ and $\alpha=-2$ for $M>1M_\odot$. This is the most conservative assumption, since the IMF we observed is best fit with a slope $\alpha=-2$ for $M>0.5M_\odot$.

-   IMF \#3: An IMF with $\alpha=-1.33$ up to $M=1M_\odot$ and $\alpha=-2.35$ (Salpeter’s value) for $M>1M_\odot$.

-   IMF \#4: Finally, we consider an IMF with $\alpha=-1.33$ up to $M=1M_\odot$, Salpeter slope for $1<M/M_\odot<2$ and
M_\odot$. By extrapolating the $ \alpha=-1.33 $ IMF from $ M=0.15M_\odot$ all the way down to zero mass, we obtain $ 123.5 M_\odot$ of unobserved dwarf, thus totaling $ 440.5 M_\odot$ in survive ace and brown dwarfs. To account for the end we want to adopt an initial aggregate - concluding mass relation. We use the semi - empirical relation proposed by Renzini & Ciotti (1993), with blank dwarf remnants of mass $ M_{\rm 
 WD}=0.48 + 0.077\,M_{\rm i}$ for initial masses $ M_{\rm i}\le 8\,\msun$, neutron star leftover of $ 1.4\,\msun$ for $ 8\le M_{\rm i}\le 
 40\,\msun$, and black holes remnants of bulk $ 0.5\,M_{\rm i}$ for $ M_{\rm i}>40\,\msun$. Since the present data do not give any constraint on the gradient of the IMF for $ M\gsim 1\,\msun$, we explore the impression on the total mass of various plausible assumption: 

 -    IMF \#1: An IMF with slope $ \alpha=-1.33 $, like the one we observed, all the way to $ 100M_\odot$. This is perhaps an extreme possibility, since all the determinations of the IMF in this mass range give steeper values (see Scalo 1998 for a recent review), and even our own IMF may steepen for $ M>0.5M_\odot$. 

 -    IMF \#2: An IMF with slope $ \alpha=-1.33 $ up to $ M=1M_\odot$ and $ \alpha=-2 $ for $ M>1M_\odot$. This is the most conservative premise, since the IMF we observed is best fit with a gradient $ \alpha=-2 $ for $ M>0.5M_\odot$. 

 -    IMF \#3: An IMF with $ \alpha=-1.33 $ up to $ M=1M_\odot$ and $ \alpha=-2.35 $ (Salpeter ’s value) for $ M>1M_\odot$. 

 -    IMF \#4: ultimately, we think an IMF with $ \alpha=-1.33 $ up to $ M=1M_\odot$, Salpeter slope for $ 1 < M / M_\odot<2 $ and
M_\odlt$. By extrapolating the $\xlpha=-1.33$ IMF from $M=0.15M_\odot$ ell the way dowv to zero mass, we obtain $123.5 M_\ovot$ if unween dwarfs, thus totalkng $440.5 M_\odon$ in livibg suars and brown dwedfs. To accounf for vhe remnants we need to agopt an initian oads-final mass relation. We used the sqmi-empitifal relation ptopostd fy Rsnzini & Ciotti (1993), with white dwarf rsmnants of mass $M_{\rm
WC}=0.48+0.077\,M_{\rm i}$ for initial masses $L_{\rm l}\le 8\,\msun$, neutron shar remnantw of $1.4\,\nsun$ for $8\le O_{\rm i}\le
40\,\msun$, and black goles remnants of mass $0.5\,M_{\rm i}$ fof $M_{\rm i}>40\,\msun$. Sinxe thf present dava do got give any constrahnt on yhe slope of tme IMH foe $M\gsim 1\,\msun$, we exploce the effect on the total mavs of various plausuboe asvumpdionr:

-   KMF \#1: En JMF wihh alope $\alphz=-1.33$, like the ine we observed, all trv way to $100M_\odof$. This if perhaps an extreme possibility, since dll the determinations of rhe IMF in this mass tange give steeper values (see Scalo 1998 for a recent review), ang evei uur orv ILF may steepen for $M>0.5M_\odot$.

-   IMF \#2: An IMF with fmoke $\slpha=-1.33$ up to $M=1M_\jdot$ and $\allhw=-2$ gjr $M>1M_\odot$. Thir is tks jost conservative wssumptyon, sunce the YMF ee observed is best fit wity a slope $\aliha=-2$ dor $M>0.5M_\odot$.

-   IMF \#3: Cn IMF with $\clpha=-1.33$ op to $K=1M_\odot$ and $\alpha=-2.35$ (Salpetzr’s vamue) for $M>1M_\ofot$.

-   IMF \#4: Finally, we conskdeg an IMF with $\alpha=-1.33$ up to $M=1M_\odjt$, Salpetxr slppe for $1<M/M_\ocot<2$ anq
M_\odot$. By extrapolating the $\alpha=-1.33$ IMF from the down to mass, we obtain thus $440.5 M_\odot$ in stars and brown To account for the remnants we to adopt an initial mass-final mass relation. We used the semi-empirical relation proposed Renzini & Ciotti (1993), with white dwarf remnants of mass $M_{\rm WD}=0.48+0.077\,M_{\rm i}$ initial $M_{\rm 8\,\msun$, star remnants of $1.4\,\msun$ for $8\le M_{\rm i}\le 40\,\msun$, and black holes remnants of mass $0.5\,M_{\rm for $M_{\rm i}>40\,\msun$. Since the present data do give any constraint on slope of the IMF for 1\,\msun$, explore the on total of various plausible - IMF \#1: An IMF with slope $\alpha=-1.33$, like the one we observed, all the way to This is extreme possibility, all determinations the IMF in range give steeper values (see Scalo recent review), and even our own IMF may for $M>0.5M_\odot$. IMF \#2: An IMF with slope up to $M=1M_\odot$ and $\alpha=-2$ for $M>1M_\odot$. This the most conservative assumption, since the IMF we observed is best fit with a slope $M>0.5M_\odot$. - IMF \#3: IMF with $\alpha=-1.33$ to and (Salpeter’s for $M>1M_\odot$. IMF \#4: Finally, we consider an IMF with $\alpha=-1.33$ up to Salpeter slope for $1<M/M_\odot<2$ and
M_\odot$. By extrapolating the $\alPha=-1.33$ IMF from $m=0.15M_\odoT$ alL thE wAy doWn to Zero mass, we obtaIN $123.5 M_\odOt$ of unseen dwarfs, thus toTalinG $440.5 M_\ODot$ iN LiVing sTars and BRoWN DwaRfS. TO acCoUNt For thE reMnants wE need to adoPt aN iNitial mass-fiNAl Mass relatiOn. WE used the semi-EmpIrical ReLatIOn proPosEd by REnzini & cIotti (1993), wIth white dWaRF remnaNTs of masS $m_{\Rm
wD}=0.48+0.077\,M_{\rM i}$ for initial masseS $m_{\rM I}\le 8\,\msun$, neutron Star reMnANtS OF $1.4\,\msUn$ fOr $8\le M_{\rm i}\le
40\,\MsUn$, and BLack holES rEMNAntS Of mass $0.5\,M_{\rm i}$ for $m_{\rm i}>40\,\msun$. SinCE thE preseNt DatA Do not gIve anY cONstRaint on the sLope Of the IMF fOr $M\gsiM 1\,\Msun$, we eXPlore thE effecT on The TotaL MaSs Of vArIOus PLaUsiBLe aSsumptioNs:

-   iMf \#1: An IMf witH SLOPe $\alPha=-1.33$, Like The onE we observed, alL thE way TO $100M_\oDot$. ThIs is pErhaPs An extReme poSsibiLiTy, since all the deTermInations oF thE ImF iN tHis maSS range GivE stEeper vaLues (see sCalO 1998 fOR A ReCent review), and even oUr OWN ImF may steEpen foR $m>0.5M_\OdOT$.

-   IMF \#2: An IMf wIth SlopE $\ALpha=-1.33$ uP to $M=1m_\OdOt$ and $\alpHa=-2$ for $M>1m_\OdOt$. this is tHe Most coNsErvAtiVe assUMptiOn, sincE the IMF wE obseRVed is best fit wiTH a slope $\alpha=-2$ fOR $M>0.5m_\ODoT$.

-   iMF \#3: AN IMf with $\alpha=-1.33$ uP to $M=1m_\Odot$ And $\aLPhA=-2.35$ (SaLPeter’S valuE) fOR $M>1m_\Odot$.

-   IMF \#4: Finally, we conSiDer an ImF witH $\alpha=-1.33$ up to $M=1M_\oDot$, SalpeteR SLOpe for $1<M/M_\Odot<2$ ANd
M_\odot$. By extrapolating  the $\alp ha=-1 .33 $ I MF  fro m $M =0.15M_\odot$a ll t he way down to zero ma ss, w eo btai n  $ 123.5  M_\odo t $o f  un se en  dw ar f s,  thus  to taling$440.5 M_\ odo t$  in living s t ar s and brow n d warfs. To ac cou nt for  t her emnan tswe ne ed toa dopt a n initial  m a ss-fin a l massr e la tion . We used the sem i -e m pirical relati on pro po s ed b y R enz ini & Ciot ti  (199 3 ), with wh i t e  dw a rf remnants o f mass $M_{ \ rmWD}=0. 48 +0. 0 77\,M_ {\rmi} $  fo r initial m asse s $M_{\rm  i}\le 8\,\msu n $, neut ron st arrem nant s  o f$1. 4\ , \ms u n$  fo r  $8 \le M_{\ rm  i }\le40\, \ m s u n$,and  bla ck ho les remnantsofmass $0. 5\,M_ {\rmi}$fo r $M_ {\rm i }>40\ ,\ msun$. Since th e pr esent dat a d onot  g ive a n y cons tra int  on the  slopeo f t he I M Ffor $M\gsim 1\,\ms un $ ,  w e explor e thee ff ec t  on theto tal  mas s of va riou s  p lausible  assum p ti on s:

-  I MF \#1 :AnIMF  with slop e $\al pha=-1.3 3$, l i ke the one weo bserved, allt he w ay to $ 100 M_\odot$. T hisi s pe rhap s  a n e x treme  poss ib i li t y, since all the de te rminat ionsof the IMF in  this mass r a nge give  ste e pe r  values (see S calo1998 for a recent r eview ), and e ven our o w n  IMF may  st eep enfor $ M> 0.5M_\odot$.-    I MF  \#2: A n I MF with  sl ope  $\ alp ha =-1.33$ u p to $M= 1M _\ od ot $ a nd $\ a lpha=-2$  f or$M >1M _\odo t $. Thi s isthemo st con servati v ea s sump ti on , si nce  t he IM F we obs erved i s best fi t w i th a  s lo pe $\al pha=-2$ for $ M> 0.5M_\odot $. 

-    IMF \ #3: An I MF with $\alpha=-1.33$u p to $M =1M _\odo t$ a nd $\alph a=- 2.35$(Sa l peter’ s valu e) fo r$M> 1 M _\odo t $ .
- IMF \#4: F i n all y, we  c onsi der anIMF with $\alpha=- 1 .33 $ up to $M=1M _\o dot$ , Sa lpe t er slo pe for $ 1<M/M_\odot<2$and
M_\odot$. By_extrapolating the_$\alpha=-1.33$ IMF from $M=0.15M_\odot$_all the_way_down to_zero_mass, we obtain_$123.5 M_\odot$ of_unseen dwarfs, thus totaling_$440.5 M_\odot$ in_living_stars and brown dwarfs. To account for the remnants we need to adopt an_initial_mass-final mass_relation._We_used the semi-empirical relation proposed_by Renzini & Ciotti (1993),_with white_dwarf remnants of mass $M_{\rm
WD}=0.48+0.077\,M_{\rm i}$ for initial_masses_$M_{\rm i}\le 8\,\msun$,_neutron star remnants of $1.4\,\msun$ for $8\le M_{\rm i}\le
40\,\msun$,_and black holes remnants of mass_$0.5\,M_{\rm i}$ for_$M_{\rm_i}>40\,\msun$._Since the present data_do not give any constraint on_the slope of the IMF for_$M\gsim 1\,\msun$, we explore the effect on_the total mass of various plausible_assumptions:

-   IMF \#1:_An IMF_with slope $\alpha=-1.33$, like the_one we observed,_all the_way to $100M_\odot$._This is perhaps an extreme possibility,_since all the_determinations of the IMF in this_mass_range give steeper_values_(see_Scalo 1998_for a recent_review),_and even_our_own IMF may steepen for $M>0.5M_\odot$.

-__ IMF \#2: An IMF with slope_$\alpha=-1.33$ up to $M=1M_\odot$_and_$\alpha=-2$ for $M>1M_\odot$. This_is the most conservative assumption,_since the IMF we observed is_best fit_with a_slope $\alpha=-2$ for $M>0.5M_\odot$.

-   IMF \#3: An IMF with_$\alpha=-1.33$ up to $M=1M_\odot$ and $\alpha=-2.35$_(Salpeter’s value) for $M>1M_\odot$.

-_ _IMF_\#4: Finally, we_consider_an IMF_with $\alpha=-1.33$ up to $M=1M_\odot$, Salpeter slope_for $1<M/M_\odot<2$_and