 the face identity while our method consistently preserves the identity across different head poses. Our method also consistently preserves the skin color where DR-GAN cannot.

**Quantitative Comparison:** the Fletcher Inception Distance (FID) [@fid2017] is introduced in Table \[tab:tcgan\_res3\] to quantitatively indicate the photo-realisticity of generated images compared to original real images. The closer to real images, the lower FID score. In Table \[tab:tcgan\_res3\], our method clearly achieves significantly lower FID score than other methods.

![image](fig/sample6_v3.jpg){width="100.00000%"}

\[fig:attr\_visual\_1\]

![image](fig/attr_pose_7_v2.jpg){width="100.00000%"}

\[fig:attr\_pose\_1\]

3D Attribute Generation
-----------------------

We manually select $5$ out of $40$ attributes defined in CelebA, which do not indicate face identity and only correlate with the facial area. They are Sunglasses (SG), Wearing lipstick (LS), 5’o clock shadow (SH), Smiling (SM), and Bangs (BA). We strictly follow the CelebA training, validation and testing splitting protocol. [^1]

Traditional attribute generation methods,, FaderNet [@fadernet] and AttGAN [@attgan], are trained on 2D images.

For fair comparison, we apply StarGAN and CycleGAN network structures, trained orthogonally on real, real plus pose augmented images and our UV texture and position maps. For real data in CelebA, we observe a strong head pose bias towards near-frontal poses. We calculate the pose by the reconstructed 3D shape vertices, and use it to split the testing data into $yaw < 45^{\circ}$ and $\ge 45^{\circ}$. As $yaw \ge 45^{\circ}$ testing data is very few, such as, $221$ images for lipstick, where $yaw < 45^{\circ}$ have $9288$ images, we augment the $yaw \ge 45^{\circ}$ data from near-frontal images and achieves $6735$ augmented samples to match the volume of $yaw < 45^{\circ}$.

**Attribute Generation Accuracy:** we apply an off-line attribute classifier, trained on CelebA
the face identity while our method consistently preserves the identity across unlike heading poses. Our method besides consistently preserve the skin coloring material where DR - GAN cannot. 

 * * Quantitative Comparison :* * the Fletcher Inception Distance (FID)   [ @fid2017 ] is inaugurate in Table   \[tab: tcgan\_res3\ ] to quantitatively indicate the photo - realisticity of generated images compare to original real images. The cheeseparing to veridical images, the lower FID score. In Table   \[tab: tcgan\_res3\ ], our method clearly achieve significantly lower FID score than early methods. 

! [ image](fig / sample6_v3.jpg){width="100.00000% " } 

 \[fig: attr\_visual\_1\ ] 

! [ image](fig / attr_pose_7_v2.jpg){width="100.00000% " } 

 \[fig: attr\_pose\_1\ ] 

 3D Attribute Generation 
 ----------------------- 

 We manually select $ 5 $ out of $ 40 $ attributes defined in CelebA, which do not bespeak face identity and only correlate with the facial area. They are Sunglasses (SG), Wearing lipstick (LS), 5’o clock shadow (SH), Smiling (SM), and Bangs (BA). We rigorously follow the CelebA training, validation and testing splitting protocol. [ ^1 ] 

 Traditional attribute generation method, , FaderNet   [ @fadernet ] and AttGAN   [ @attgan ], are trained on 2D images. 

 For fair comparison, we apply StarGAN and CycleGAN network structures, trained orthogonally on real, real plus pose augment images and our UV texture and stead maps. For real data in CelebA, we observe a potent pass pose bias towards near - frontal affectation. We calculate the pose by the reconstructed 3D shape vertices, and use it to split the testing datum into $ yaw < 45^{\circ}$ and $ \ge 45^{\circ}$. As $ yaw \ge 45^{\circ}$ testing data is very few, such as, $ 221 $ images for lipstick, where $ yaw < 45^{\circ}$ have $ 9288 $ images, we augment the $ yaw \ge 45^{\circ}$ data from near - frontal images and achieve $ 6735 $ augment samples to match the volume of $ yaw < 45^{\circ}$. 

 * * Attribute Generation Accuracy :* * we apply an off - lineage attribute classifier, trained on CelebA
 thf face identity while ouv method consistgnrly prxserves the idevtity across different head 'osew. Our method also consistengly presegves the wkin xolor wherx DR-GAN gcnnot.

**Smanticavive Comparison:** the Fletcver Inception Girtcnce (FID) [@fid2017] is introduced in Table \[taf:tcgan\_rrs3\] to quantitatidely yndidate the photo-realisticity of genedated ikages comparec to original real images. Hhe floser to real imahes, the lowgd FYE score. In Txble \[tab:tcgan\_res3\], our mejhod clearly achieves significangly lpwer FID sxoee hvan other mxthods.

![pmage](fig/samplc6_n3.jpg){widdh="100.00000%"}

\[fig:atyr\_visual\_1\]

![image](flg/attc_posw_7_v2.jpg){width="100.00000%"}

\[fig:attr\_pose\_1\]

3V Attribute Generatijn
-----------------------

We manudlmy select $5$ out of $40$ qttritutev dewunea ih RelsbA, whlch do not insicate face identity and only vowgrlate with tge facyaj area. They are Sunglasses (SG), Wearing lppstjck (LS), 5’o clock shadow (SY), Smiling (SM), and Bangd (BA). We serictly follow the CelebA training, validation and testmne skllbtine pgotocol. [^1]

Traditional attribute generation methjss,, FsderNet [@faderneb] and AttGAN [@attgan], age jrained on 2D ioages.

For rair comparison, we apply FtarGQN and CysleGSN network structures, trainwd orthogonajoy on real, real plbs pose augmznted omagex and our UV texture anb posifion maps. Flr real dzga in CelebA, we ubsvrve a strong head pose bias tjwards neer-froutal posds. Wg calcujate the plse bn the reconstructed 3D shcpe vartices, anf use it to split the testing deva into $yaw < 45^{\visc}$ dnd $\ge 45^{\cnrc}$. As $yaw \ge 45^{\circ}$ eesting data ix very yew, suzh as, $221$ imafes for lipstick, wrere $yaw < 45^{\cirw}$ have $9288$ imagev, we augient the $yaw \ge 45^{\zirc}$ data from near-fronnaj imqges and achieves $6735$ auejented samples cu match the voluke uf $raa < 45^{\cysc}$.

**Attribute Cenefatkpn Aczuracy:** we aiplh an off-line attribute cnassjfier, trained on CrlcbA
the face identity while our method consistently identity different head Our method also where cannot. **Quantitative Comparison:** Fletcher Inception Distance [@fid2017] is introduced in Table \[tab:tcgan\_res3\] quantitatively indicate the photo-realisticity of generated images compared to original real images. The to real images, the lower FID score. In Table \[tab:tcgan\_res3\], our method clearly significantly FID than methods. ![image](fig/sample6_v3.jpg){width="100.00000%"} \[fig:attr\_visual\_1\] ![image](fig/attr_pose_7_v2.jpg){width="100.00000%"} \[fig:attr\_pose\_1\] 3D Attribute Generation ----------------------- We manually select $5$ out of $40$ defined in CelebA, which do not indicate face and only correlate with facial area. They are Sunglasses Wearing (LS), 5’o shadow Smiling and Bangs (BA). strictly follow the CelebA training, validation and testing splitting protocol. [^1] Traditional attribute generation methods,, FaderNet [@fadernet] AttGAN [@attgan], on 2D For comparison, apply StarGAN and structures, trained orthogonally on real, real images and our UV texture and position maps. real data CelebA, we observe a strong head bias towards near-frontal poses. We calculate the pose the reconstructed 3D shape vertices, and use it to split the testing data into $yaw and $\ge 45^{\circ}$. As \ge 45^{\circ}$ testing is few, as, images for where $yaw < 45^{\circ}$ have $9288$ images, we augment the $yaw 45^{\circ}$ data from near-frontal images and achieves $6735$ augmented samples the of $yaw < **Attribute Generation Accuracy:** we an attribute classifier, trained on
 the face identity while our meThod consisTentlY prEseRvEs thE ideNtity across difFErenT head poses. Our method alsO consIsTEntlY PrEservEs the skIN cOLOr wHeRe dR-GaN CAnNot.

**QuAntItative comparison:** The flEtcher InceptIOn distance (FId) [@fiD2017] is introduceD in table \[tAb:TcgAN\_res3\] tO quAntitAtivelY IndicaTe the photO-rEAlistiCIty of geNERaTed iMages compared to orIGiNAl real images. ThE closeR tO ReAL ImaGes, The lower FId sCore. IN table \[taB:TcGAN\_Res3\], OUr method clearLy achieves sIGniFicantLy LowER FID scOre thAn OTheR methods.

![imaGe](fiG/sample6_v3.jPg){widtH="100.00000%"}

\[Fig:attr\_VIsual\_1\]

![imAge](fig/AttR_poSe_7_v2.jPG){wIdTh="100.00000%"}

\[fIg:ATtr\_POsE\_1\]

3D ATTriBute GeneRaTiOn
-----------------------

We mAnuaLLY SElecT $5$ ouT of $40$ aTtribUtes defined in celEbA, wHIch Do not IndicAte fAcE idenTity anD only CoRrelate with the fAciaL area. They Are suNglAsSes (SG), wEaring LipStiCk (LS), 5’o clOck shadOW (SH), smILINg (sM), and Bangs (BA). We striCtLY FoLlow the CElebA tRAiNiNG, validatIoN anD tesTINg splIttiNG pRotocol. [^1]

TRaditiONaL aTtributE gEneratIoN meThoDs,, FadERNet [@FadernEt] and AttgAN [@atTGan], are trained oN 2d images.

For faiR CoMPArISon, wE apPly StarGAN aNd CyCLeGAn netWOrK stRUcturEs, traInED oRThogonally on real, reaL pLus posE augmEnted images anD our UV textURE And positIon mAPs. fOr real data in CeLebA, wE observe a sTRong head Pose bIas towarDs near-froNTAl poses. WE caLcuLatE thE POsE by the reconstRUCted 3d sHape verTicEs, and usE it To sPliT thE tEsting datA into $yaw < 45^{\CiRc}$ AnD $\gE 45^{\ciRc}$. As $yAW \ge 45^{\circ}$ tEsTinG dAta Is verY Few, sucH as, $221$ imAges FoR lIPstIck, wherE $YaW < 45^{\CIrc}$ hAvE $9288$ iMageS, we AuGment The $yAW \ge 45^{\Circ}$ datA from near-FroNTal iMaGeS and achIeves $6735$ augmenteD sAmples to maTcH thE volumE OF $yaw < 45^{\circ}$.

**attribute Generation AccuRAcy:** we apPly An off-Line Attribute ClaSsifieR, trAIned on celebA
 the face identity while o ur methodconsi ste ntl ypres erve s the identity acro ss different head pose s. Ou rm etho d  a lso c onsiste n tl y pre se rv esth e  s kin c olo r where  DR-GAN ca nno t. 

**Quantita t iv e Comparis on: ** the Fletc her  Incep ti onD istan ce(FID)  [@fid 2 017] i s introdu ce d  in Ta b le \[ta b : tc gan\ _res3\] to quanti t at i vely indicatethe ph ot o -r e a lis tic ity of gen er atedi mages c o mp a r e d t o  original rea l images. T h e c loserto  re a l imag es, t he low er FID scor e. I n Table \ [tab:t c gan\_re s 3\], ou r meth odcle arly ac hi eve ss ign i fi can t lylower FI Dsc ore t hano t h e r me tho ds.
![im age](fig/samp le6 _v3. j pg) {widt h="10 0.00 00 0%"}
\[fig :attr \_ visual\_1\]

![ imag e](fig/at tr_ po se_ 7_ v2.jp g ){widt h=" 100 .00000% "}

\[f i g:a tt r \ _ po se\_1\]

3D Attrib ut e Ge neration 
----- - -- -- - -------- -- --
Wem a nuall y se l ec t $5$ ou t of $ 4 0$  a ttribut es  defin ed  in  Ce lebA, whic h do n ot indic ate f a ce identity an d  only correla t ew i th thefac ial area. T heya re S ungl a ss es( SG),Weari ng li p stick (LS), 5’o clo ck  shado w (SH ), Smiling (S M), and Ba n g s  (BA). W e st r ic t ly follow theCeleb A training ,  validat ion a nd testi ng splitt i n g protoc ol.  [^ 1]
Tr a d it ional attribu t e  gen er ation m eth ods,, F ade rNe t [ @fa de rnet] and  AttGAN[@ at tg an ],are t r ained on  2 D i ma ges .

Fo r  faircompa riso n,  w e  ap ply Sta r GA N andCy cl eGAN  ne tw ork s truc t ure s, trai ned ortho gon a llyon  r eal, re al plus poseau gmented im ag esand ou r UV textu re and position maps. F o r realdat a inCele bA, we ob ser ve a s tro n g head  posebiasto war d s  near - f ro nta lposes. Wec a lcu lateth e po se by t he reconstructed 3 D  sh ape vertices,  an d us e it  to sp l itth e  te s t ing data into $ yaw < 45^{ \c i rc }$ and $\g e  45 ^{ \circ}$ . As $y aw \g e  45^{\c irc}$ tes ting data  i s ve r y  fe w, such as , $221$images fo r  lips t ic k, wh ere  $yaw<45^ {\cir c}$ ha v e $ 9288$  image s,  we au gment  t he $yaw\ge 45^{\circ}$ data fr om nea r-fro nta l imagesand ach ieves $67 35$augmentedsam ple s tomat c h the  vol u me  of $yaw< 45 ^ {\circ}$. 
* *At t r ib ute Generat i o n  Ac curac y:* *  we ap plyan off-line attri b ute classifier , tr a i ned  on Cele bA 
 the_face identity_while our method consistently_preserves the_identity_across different_head_poses. Our method_also consistently preserves_the skin color where_DR-GAN cannot.

**Quantitative Comparison:**_the_Fletcher Inception Distance (FID) [@fid2017] is introduced in Table \[tab:tcgan\_res3\] to quantitatively indicate the photo-realisticity of_generated_images compared_to_original_real images. The closer to_real images, the lower FID_score. In_Table \[tab:tcgan\_res3\], our method clearly achieves significantly lower FID_score_than other methods.

![image](fig/sample6_v3.jpg){width="100.00000%"}

\[fig:attr\_visual\_1\]

![image](fig/attr_pose_7_v2.jpg){width="100.00000%"}

\[fig:attr\_pose\_1\]

3D_Attribute Generation
-----------------------

We manually select $5$ out of $40$ attributes_defined in CelebA, which do not_indicate face identity_and_only_correlate with the facial_area. They are Sunglasses (SG), Wearing_lipstick (LS), 5’o clock shadow (SH),_Smiling (SM), and Bangs (BA). We strictly_follow the CelebA training, validation and_testing splitting protocol. [^1]

Traditional attribute_generation methods,,_FaderNet [@fadernet] and AttGAN [@attgan], are trained_on 2D images.

For_fair comparison,_we apply StarGAN_and CycleGAN network structures, trained orthogonally_on real, real_plus pose augmented images and our_UV_texture and position_maps._For_real data_in CelebA, we_observe_a strong_head_pose bias towards near-frontal poses. We_calculate_the pose by the reconstructed 3D shape_vertices, and use it_to_split the testing data_into $yaw < 45^{\circ}$ and_$\ge 45^{\circ}$. As $yaw \ge 45^{\circ}$_testing data_is very_few, such as, $221$ images for lipstick, where $yaw < 45^{\circ}$_have $9288$ images, we augment the_$yaw \ge 45^{\circ}$ data_from near-frontal_images_and achieves $6735$_augmented_samples to_match the volume of $yaw < 45^{\circ}$.

**Attribute_Generation Accuracy:**_we apply an off-line attribute classifier,_trained on CelebA