leq \frac{2\arrowvert\Ric\arrowvert}{\arrowvert X\arrowvert^2} \,  \left| (\Li_{U_i^m}g ) \right| +\textit{O}(f^{-1}).\end{aligned}$$ Hence, we obtain the result by integrating over $\Omega_m$.

$(iii)$ As before, we compute, $$\begin{aligned}
\nabla_X \langle U_i^m,X\rangle&=&\langle \nabla_XU_i^m,X\rangle+\langle U_i^m,\nabla_XX\rangle\\
&=&2\langle \nabla_{U_i^m}X,X\rangle=\langle U_i^m,X\rangle-2\Ric(X,U_i^m)\\
&=&\langle U_i^m,X\rangle+\textit{O}(f^{-a(n)/2+\epsilon}).\end{aligned}$$ Now, by construction, we have that $\langle U_i^m,X\rangle=0$ on $M_{t_m^2/4}$. Hence, integrating the previous estimate on $\Omega_m$, we obtain $\langle U_i^m,X\rangle \,= \,\textit{O}(t_m^{-a(n)+\epsilon})$ on $\Omega_m$ and the result follows at once.

$(iv)$ As we noticed in Remark \[remeq\], one has that $\Delta U_i^m+\Ric(U_i^m, \cdot ) \, = \, \Delta_fU_i^m+U_i^m/2$. On the other hand, it holds the identity $$\div(\Li_{U_i^m}g ) \, - \, \frac12 \nabla(\tr(\Li_{U_i^m}g )) \,\, = \,\, \Delta U_i^m \, + \,\Ric(U_i^m, \cdot ) \,.$$ To estimate the left hand side, we notice that (ii) gives $\hbox{$\sup_{\Omega_m}$} | \Li_{U_i^m} g \, | \, = \, \textit{O} \, (t_m^{-a(n)+\epsilon})$. Moreover, it is possible to deduce form (i) that $ \sup_{\Omega_m}\arrowvert\nabla^{k}\Li_{U_
leq \frac{2\arrowvert\Ric\arrowvert}{\arrowvert X\arrowvert^2 } \,   \left| (\Li_{U_i^m}g) \right| + \textit{O}(f^{-1}).\end{aligned}$$ Hence, we obtain the result by integrating over $ \Omega_m$. 

 $ (iii)$ As earlier, we calculate, $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 \nabla_X \langle U_i^m, X\rangle&=&\langle \nabla_XU_i^m, X\rangle+\langle U_i^m,\nabla_XX\rangle\\ 
 & = & 2\langle \nabla_{U_i^m}X, X\rangle=\langle U_i^m, X\rangle-2\Ric(X, U_i^m)\\ 
 & = & \langle U_i^m, X\rangle+\textit{O}(f^{-a(n)/2+\epsilon}).\end{aligned}$$ Now, by construction, we get that $ \langle U_i^m, X\rangle=0 $ on $ M_{t_m^2/4}$. therefore, integrating the previous estimate on $ \Omega_m$, we receive $ \langle U_i^m, X\rangle \,= \,\textit{O}(t_m^{-a(n)+\epsilon})$ on $ \Omega_m$ and the result follows at once. 

 $ (iv)$ As we detect in Remark   \[remeq\ ], one has that $ \Delta U_i^m+\Ric(U_i^m, \cdot) \, = \, \Delta_fU_i^m+U_i^m/2$. On the other bridge player, it holds the identity $ $ \div(\Li_{U_i^m}g) \, - \, \frac12 \nabla(\tr(\Li_{U_i^m}g) ) \,\, = \,\, \Delta U_i^m \, + \,\Ric(U_i^m, \cdot) \,.$$ To estimate the leftover hand side, we detect that (ii) gives $ \hbox{$\sup_{\Omega_m}$ } | \Li_{U_i^m } g \, | \, = \, \textit{O } \, (t_m^{-a(n)+\epsilon})$. Moreover, it is potential to deduce form (i) that $ \sup_{\Omega_m}\arrowvert\nabla^{k}\Li_{U _
leq \frac{2\arrowvert\Ric\arrowvevt}{\arrowvert X\arrowvert^2} \,  \left| (\Li_{U_i^m}g ) \right| +\textit{O}(f^{-1}).\end{aligned}$$ Heice, qe obucin the result by ingegrating over $\Omwga_m$.

$(mii)$ As before, we compute, $$\begin{zpignzd}
\iabla_X \langle U_l^m,X\rangle&=&\latgle \nabla_XU_i^m,F\rxnyle+\langle U_i^m,\nabla_XX\rangle\\
&=&2\langle \nabja_{U_i^m}X,X\tajgle=\langle U_i^m,V\ranbje-2\Rid(Q,U_l^m)\\
&=&\langle U_i^m,X\rangle+\textit{O}(f^{-a(n)/2+\epsjlon}).\end{eligned}$$ Now, by vonstruction, we have that $\pangpe U_i^m,X\rangle=0$ on $M_{h_m^2/4}$. Hence, injsgrwring the prexious estimate on $\Omegz_m$, we obtain $\langle U_i^m,X\rangle \,= \,\textnt{O}(t_m^{-a(n)+\epsioob})$ oj $\Omega_m$ and the gesult follows at onca.

$(iv)$ As ee noticed in Vemarn \[reneq\], one has that $\Delte U_i^m+\Ric(U_i^m, \cdot ) \, = \, \Delta_fU_i^k+U_n^m/2$. On the other hand, ut holdv tha iddbtigy $$\sit(\Li_{H_i^m}g ) \, - \, \hrac12 \nabla(\td(\Li_{U_i^m}g )) \,\, = \,\, \Delta U_i^m \, + \,\Ric(U_i^m, \cqit ) \,.$$ To estimzte thq jeft hand side, we notice that (ii) gives $\vbos{$\sup_{\Omega_m}$} | \Li_{U_i^m} g \, | \, = \, \textit{O} \, (t_m^{-a(n)+\epsiloj})$. Moreovew, it is possible to deduce form (i) that $ \sup_{\Omega_m}\drrowteft\ncnjx^{j}\Ll_{U_
leq \frac{2\arrowvert\Ric\arrowvert}{\arrowvert X\arrowvert^2} \, \left| (\Li_{U_i^m}g ) Hence, obtain the by integrating over compute, \nabla_X \langle U_i^m,X\rangle&=&\langle U_i^m,\nabla_XX\rangle\\ &=&2\langle \nabla_{U_i^m}X,X\rangle=\langle &=&\langle U_i^m,X\rangle+\textit{O}(f^{-a(n)/2+\epsilon}).\end{aligned}$$ Now, by construction, we that $\langle U_i^m,X\rangle=0$ on $M_{t_m^2/4}$. Hence, integrating the previous estimate on $\Omega_m$, we $\langle U_i^m,X\rangle \,= \,\textit{O}(t_m^{-a(n)+\epsilon})$ on $\Omega_m$ and the result follows at once. $(iv)$ we in \[remeq\], has that $\Delta U_i^m+\Ric(U_i^m, \cdot ) \, = \, \Delta_fU_i^m+U_i^m/2$. On the other hand, it holds identity $$\div(\Li_{U_i^m}g ) \, - \, \frac12 \nabla(\tr(\Li_{U_i^m}g \,\, = \,\, \Delta \, + \,\Ric(U_i^m, \cdot ) To the left side, notice (ii) gives $\hbox{$\sup_{\Omega_m}$} \Li_{U_i^m} g \, | \, = \, \textit{O} \, (t_m^{-a(n)+\epsilon})$. Moreover, it is possible to deduce form that $
leq \frac{2\arrowvert\Ric\arrowvErt}{\arrowveRt X\arRowVerT^2} \,  \lEft| (\LI_{U_i^m}G ) \right| +\textit{O}(f^{-1}).\ENd{alIgned}$$ Hence, we obtain the rEsult By INtegRAtIng ovEr $\Omega_M$.

$(IiI)$ aS beFoRe, We cOmPUtE, $$\begiN{alIgned}
\naBla_X \langle u_i^m,x\rAngle&=&\langle \nABlA_XU_i^m,X\rangLe+\lAngle U_i^m,\nablA_XX\Rangle\\
&=&2\LaNglE \Nabla_{u_i^m}x,X\ranGle=\lanGLe U_i^m,X\Rangle-2\Ric(x,U_I^M)\\
&=&\langlE u_i^m,X\ranGLE+\tExtiT{O}(f^{-a(n)/2+\epsilon}).\end{alIGnED}$$ Now, by construcTion, we HaVE tHAT $\laNglE U_i^m,X\ranglE=0$ oN $M_{t_m^2/4}$. HENce, inteGRaTING thE Previous estimAte on $\Omega_m$, WE obTain $\laNgLe U_I^M,X\rangLe \,= \,\texTiT{o}(t_m^{-A(n)+\epsilon})$ on $\omegA_m$ and the rEsult fOLlows at ONce.

$(iv)$ As We notiCed In REmarK \[ReMeQ\], onE hAS thAT $\DEltA u_i^m+\ric(U_i^m, \cdOt ) \, = \, \deLta_fU_I^m+U_i^M/2$. oN THe otHer Hand, It holDs the identity $$\Div(\li_{U_i^M}G ) \, - \, \frAc12 \nabLa(\tr(\LI_{U_i^m}G )) \,\, = \,\, \DElta U_I^m \, + \,\Ric(U_I^m, \cdoT ) \,.$$ TO estimate the lefT hanD side, we noTicE tHat (Ii) Gives $\HBox{$\sup_{\omeGa_m}$} | \li_{U_i^m} g \, | \, = \, \tExtit{O} \, (t_M^{-A(n)+\ePsILON})$. MOreover, it is possiblE tO DEdUce form (i) That $ \suP_{\omEgA_M}\arrowveRt\NabLa^{k}\LI_{u_
leq \frac{2\arrowvert\Ric\ arrowvert} {\arr owv ert  X \arr owve rt^2} \,  \lef t | (\ Li_{U_i^m}g ) \right|+\tex ti t {O}( f ^{ -1}). \end{al i gn e d }$$  H en ce,  w e  o btain  th e resul t by integ rat in g over $\Ome g a_ m$.

$(iii )$As before, w e c ompute ,$$\ b egin{ ali gned} 
\nabl a _X \la ngle U_i^ m, X \rangl e &=&\lan g l e\nab la_XU_i^m,X\rangl e +\ l angle U_i^m,\n abla_X X\ r an g l e\\ 
&= &2\langle\n abla_ { U_i^m}X , X\ r a n gle = \langle U_i^m ,X\rangle-2 \ Ric (X,U_i ^m )\\ &=&\la ngleU_ i ^m, X\rangle+\t exti t{O}(f^{- a(n)/2 + \epsilo n }).\end {align ed} $$Now, by  c ons tr u cti o n,  we hav e that $ \l an gle U _i^m , X \ r angl e=0 $ on  $M_{ t_m^2/4}$. He nce , in t egr ating  theprev io us es timate  on $ \O mega_m$, we obt ain$\langleU_i ^m ,X\ ra ngle\ ,= \,\ tex tit {O}(t_m ^{-a(n) + \ep si l o n }) $ on $\Omega_m$ an dt h eresult f ollows at  o n ce.

$(i v) $ A s we n otice d in Re mark \[r emeq\] ,  o ne  has th at  $\Del ta  U_ i^m +\Ric ( U_i^ m, \cd ot ) \,= \,\ Delta_fU_i^m+U _ i^m/2$. On th e  o t h er hand , i t holds the  ide n tity  $$\ d iv (\L i _{U_i ^m}g)\ ,-  \, \frac12 \nabla( \t r(\Li_ {U_i^ m}g )) \,\, =  \,\, \Del t a U_i^m \,  + \ , \R i c(U_i^m, \cdot  ) \, .$$ To est i mate the  left  hand si de, we no t i ce that(ii ) g ive s $ \ h bo x{$\sup_{\Ome g a _m}$ }| \Li_{ U_i ^m} g \ , |  \,  =\,\t extit{O}\, (t_m^ {- a( n) +\ eps ilon} ) $. Moreo ve r,it  is  poss i ble to  dedu ce f or m( i)that $\ su p _ {\Om eg a_ m}\a rro wv ert\n abla ^ {k} \Li_{U_ 
leq \frac{2\arrowvert\Ric\arrowvert}{\arrowvert_X\arrowvert^2} \,_ \left| (\Li_{U_i^m}g )_\right| +\textit{O}(f^{-1}).\end{aligned}$$_Hence,_we obtain_the_result by integrating_over $\Omega_m$.

$(iii)$ As_before, we compute, $$\begin{aligned}
\nabla_X_\langle U_i^m,X\rangle&=&\langle \nabla_XU_i^m,X\rangle+\langle_U_i^m,\nabla_XX\rangle\\
&=&2\langle_\nabla_{U_i^m}X,X\rangle=\langle U_i^m,X\rangle-2\Ric(X,U_i^m)\\
&=&\langle U_i^m,X\rangle+\textit{O}(f^{-a(n)/2+\epsilon}).\end{aligned}$$ Now, by construction, we have that $\langle U_i^m,X\rangle=0$ on $M_{t_m^2/4}$. Hence,_integrating_the previous_estimate_on_$\Omega_m$, we obtain $\langle U_i^m,X\rangle_\,= \,\textit{O}(t_m^{-a(n)+\epsilon})$ on $\Omega_m$ and_the result_follows at once.

$(iv)$ As we noticed in Remark \[remeq\],_one_has that $\Delta_U_i^m+\Ric(U_i^m, \cdot ) \, = \, \Delta_fU_i^m+U_i^m/2$. On the_other hand, it holds the identity_$$\div(\Li_{U_i^m}g ) \,_-_\,_\frac12 \nabla(\tr(\Li_{U_i^m}g )) \,\,_= \,\, \Delta U_i^m \, +_\,\Ric(U_i^m, \cdot ) \,.$$ To estimate_the left hand side, we notice that_(ii) gives $\hbox{$\sup_{\Omega_m}$} | \Li_{U_i^m} g_\, | \, = \,_\textit{O} \,_(t_m^{-a(n)+\epsilon})$. Moreover, it is possible_to deduce form_(i) that_$ \sup_{\Omega_m}\arrowvert\nabla^{k}\Li_{U_