 model^a^ & $0.131$ & $0.150$\
\
Measured & $<0.030$^b^ & $0.079\pm0.019$\
With TiO/VO model & $0.039$ & $0.042$\
No TiO/VO model & $0.044$ & $0.045$\
\
Measured & $>0.128$^b^ & $0.116^{+0.018}_{-0.019}$\
With TiO/VO model & $0.121$ & $0.151$\
No TiO/VO model &$0.089$ & $0.105$\
\
Measured & $1.0\pm 1.1$ & $0.6\pm 1.1$\
With TiO/VO model & $-1.1$ & $-1.1$\
No TiO/VO model & $-3.2$ & $-3.2$\
\
Measured & $1.1^{+1.5}_{-1.6}$ & $0.6^{+1.5}_{-1.7}$\
With TiO/VO model & $-3.2$ & $-2.1$\
No TiO/VO model & $-5.3$ & $-4.2$\

[**Notes.**]{}

^a^[Both models for HAT-P-7b assume solar metallicity.]{}

^b^[Based on a $2\sigma$ upper limit of the minimum flux ratio.]{}

^c^[Difference between maximum and minimum flux ratios.]{}

^d^[The maximum and minimum flux offsets are measured relative to the center of secondary eclipse time and center of transit time, respectively. Negative time offsets indicate an eastward shift in the location of the hot or cold region in the planet’s atmosphere.]{}

After subtracting and dividing out the brightness of the star alone, i.e., the flux measured during secondary eclipse, we obtain the phase variation of the relative planet–star flux ratio (Figures \[lightcurve1\] and \[lightcurve2\]). Tables \[tab:comparison1\] and \[tab:comparison2\] list the important quantitative characteristics of the WASP-19b and HAT-P-7b phase curves, respectively. By examining the properties of these phase curves, we obtain a basic picture of the temperature distribution across the planets’ surfaces, from which we can begin to infer aspects of the planets’ energy
model^a^ & $ 0.131 $ & $ 0.150$\ 
 \ 
 Measured & $ < 0.030$^b^ & $ 0.079\pm0.019$\ 
 With TiO / VO model & $ 0.039 $ & $ 0.042$\ 
 No TiO / VO model & $ 0.044 $ & $ 0.045$\ 
 \ 
 Measured & $ > 0.128$^b^ & $ 0.116^{+0.018}_{-0.019}$\ 
 With TiO / VO exemplar & $ 0.121 $ & $ 0.151$\ 
 No TiO / VO exemplar & $ 0.089 $ & $ 0.105$\ 
 \ 
 Measured & $ 1.0\pm 1.1 $ & $ 0.6\pm 1.1$\ 
 With TiO / VO model & $ -1.1 $ & $ -1.1$\ 
 No TiO / VO model & $ -3.2 $ & $ -3.2$\ 
 \ 
 Measured & $ 1.1^{+1.5}_{-1.6}$ & $ 0.6^{+1.5}_{-1.7}$\ 
 With TiO / VO mannequin & $ -3.2 $ & $ -2.1$\ 
 No TiO / VO model & $ -5.3 $ & $ -4.2$\ 

 [ * * Notes. * * ] { } 

 ^a^[Both exemplar for HAT - P-7b assume solar metallicity. ] { } 

 ^b^[Based on a $ 2\sigma$ upper limit of the minimum magnetic field ratio. ] { } 

 ^c^[Difference between maximum and minimal flux ratios. ] { } 

 ^d^[The maximum and minimum magnetic field offsets are measured relative to the center of secondary eclipse clock time and center of transit time, respectively. minus time offsets indicate an eastward transformation in the location of the hot or cold region in the planet ’s atmosphere. ] { } 

 After subtract and dividing out the brightness of the star alone, i.e., the flux measured during secondary eclipse, we obtain the phase variation of the relative planet – star flux ratio (Figures   \[lightcurve1\ ] and \[lightcurve2\ ]). Tables   \[tab: comparison1\ ] and \[tab: comparison2\ ] list the significant quantitative characteristics of the WASP-19b and HAT - P-7b phase curves, respectively. By probe the place of these phase curves, we obtain a basic picture of the temperature distribution across the planets ’ surfaces, from which we can begin to infer expression of the planets ’ energy
 mofel^a^ & $0.131$ & $0.150$\
\
Measured & $<0.030$^b^ & $0.079\pm0.019$\
Wlth TiO/VO model & $0.039$ & $0.042$\
No TmO/VO mosel & $0.044$ & $0.045$\
\
Mdasured & $>0.128$^b^ & $0.116^{+0.018}_{-0.019}$\
With TiO/VO model & $0.121$ & $0.151$\
No UpO/VO model &$0.089$ & $0.105$\
\
Measured & $1.0\pm 1.1$ & $0.6\pm 1.1$\
With TiI/VO nidel & $-1.1$ & $-1.1$\
No TiO/VO model & $-3.2$ & $-3.2$\
\
Meavnred & $1.1^{+1.5}_{-1.6}$ & $0.6^{+1.5}_{-1.7}$\
With TiP/VO model & $-3.2$ & $-2.1$\
No TiO/VO mogeu & $-5.3$ & $-4.2$\

[**Notes.**]{}

^a^[Both models for HAT-P-7b assuie solat letallicity.]{}

^b^[Bafed pg a $2\apgna$ upper limit of the minimum flux retio.]{}

^c^[Difference between maximum and minimkm fpux ratios.]{}

^d^[The maxlmum and mibimui flux offsetr are measlxed relativg to the center of secondary eclkpse cime and cebtwr lx transit tmme, refpectively. Ncbative time ogfsets indicatc an xastqard shift in the locetion of the hot or sold regimn in the planet’s armisphete.]{}

Aftar sjvtrxctjnj ahd divldiig out the grightness if the star alone, i.t., trv flux measursd durynd secondary eclipse, we obtain the phase vadiation of the relative planet–star flux ratil (Figures \[jightcurve1\] and \[lightcurve2\]). Tables \[tab:comparison1\] and \[tab:ckopaxlfub2\] pist the important quantitative characteristisa pf the WASP-19b and HAT-P-7b phasr futdes, respectivgly. By zsajining the propertles of jhese phase curdes, ee obtain a basic picture od the temperctuee distribution acxoss the plauets’ sorfacex, from which we can begnn to jnfer aspechs of the olanets’ energy
model^a^ & $0.131$ & $0.150$\ \ Measured & With TiO/VO & $0.039$ & $0.044$ $0.045$\ \ Measured $>0.128$^b^ & $0.116^{+0.018}_{-0.019}$\ TiO/VO model & $0.121$ & $0.151$\ TiO/VO model &$0.089$ & $0.105$\ \ Measured & $1.0\pm 1.1$ & $0.6\pm 1.1$\ TiO/VO model & $-1.1$ & $-1.1$\ No TiO/VO model & $-3.2$ & $-3.2$\ Measured $1.1^{+1.5}_{-1.6}$ $0.6^{+1.5}_{-1.7}$\ TiO/VO model & $-3.2$ & $-2.1$\ No TiO/VO model & $-5.3$ & $-4.2$\ [**Notes.**]{} ^a^[Both models HAT-P-7b assume solar metallicity.]{} ^b^[Based on a $2\sigma$ limit of the minimum ratio.]{} ^c^[Difference between maximum and flux ^d^[The maximum minimum offsets measured relative to center of secondary eclipse time and center of transit time, respectively. Negative time offsets indicate an eastward in the the hot cold in planet’s atmosphere.]{} After dividing out the brightness of the the flux measured during secondary eclipse, we obtain phase variation the relative planet–star flux ratio (Figures and \[lightcurve2\]). Tables \[tab:comparison1\] and \[tab:comparison2\] list the quantitative characteristics of the WASP-19b and HAT-P-7b phase curves, respectively. By examining the properties of curves, we obtain a picture of the distribution the surfaces, which we begin to infer aspects of the planets’ energy
 model^a^ & $0.131$ & $0.150$\
\
Measured & $<0.030$^b^ & $0.079\pm0.019$\
With TiO/Vo model & $0.039$ & $0.042$\
No Tio/VO moDel & $0.044$ & $0.045$\
\
meaSuRed & $>0.128$^b^ & $0.116^{+0.018}_{-0.019}$\
with tiO/VO model & $0.121$ & $0.151$\
No Tio/vO moDel &$0.089$ & $0.105$\
\
Measured & $1.0\pm 1.1$ & $0.6\pm 1.1$\
With TiO/vO modEl & $-1.1$ & $-1.1$\
nO TiO/vo mOdel & $-3.2$ & $-3.2$\
\
MEasured & $1.1^{+1.5}_{-1.6}$ & $0.6^{+1.5}_{-1.7}$\
wItH tIO/Vo mOdEl & $-3.2$ & $-2.1$\
NO TIo/Vo modeL & $-5.3$ & $-4.2$\

[**NoTes.**]{}

^a^[BotH models for hAT-p-7b Assume solar mETaLlicity.]{}

^b^[BaSed On a $2\sigma$ uppeR liMit of tHe MinIMum flUx rAtio.]{}

^c^[differENce betWeen maximUm ANd miniMUm flux rATIoS.]{}

^d^[ThE maximum and minimuM FlUX offsets are meaSured rElATiVE To tHe cEnter of secOnDary eCLipse tiME aND CEntER of transit timE, respectiveLY. NeGative TiMe oFFsets iNdicaTe AN eaStward shift In thE location Of the hOT or cold REgion in The plaNet’S atMospHErE.]{}

AFteR sUBtrACtIng ANd dIviding oUt ThE brigHtneSS OF The sTar AlonE, i.e., thE flux measured DurIng sEConDary eClipsE, we oBtAin thE phase VariaTiOn of the relative PlanEt–star fluX raTiO (FiGuRes \[liGHtcurvE1\] anD \[liGhtcurvE2\]). Tables \[TAb:cOmPARIsOn1\] and \[tab:comparison2\] LiST ThE importaNt quanTItAtIVe characTeRisTics OF The WAsP-19b aND HaT-P-7b phasE curveS, ReSpEctivelY. BY examiNiNg tHe pRoperTIes oF these Phase curVes, we OBtain a basic picTUre of the tempeRAtURE dIStriButIon across thE plaNEts’ sUrfaCEs, FroM Which We can BeGIn TO infer aspects of the pLaNets’ enErgy
 model^a^ & $0.131$ & $0.1 50$\
\
Mea sured  &$<0 .0 30$^ b^ &  $0.079\pm0.01 9 $\
W ith TiO/VO model & $0. 039$&$ 0.04 2 $\ 
No T iO/VO m o de l & $ 0. 04 4$&$ 0. 045$\ 
\Measure d & $>0.12 8$^ b^  & $0.116^{+ 0 .0 18}_{-0.01 9}$ \
With TiO/V O m odel &  $ 0.1 2 1$ &$0. 151$\ 
No Ti O /VO mo del &$0.0 89 $  & $0. 1 05$\
\M e as ured  & $1.0\pm 1.1$ & $0 . 6\pm 1.1$\
Wit h TiO/ VO mo d e l &  $- 1.1$ & $-1 .1 $\
No TiO/VOm od e l & $ - 3.2$ & $-3.2$ \
\
Measure d  &$1.1^{ +1 .5} _ {-1.6} $ & $ 0. 6 ^{+ 1.5}_{-1.7} $\
W ith TiO/V O mode l  & $-3. 2 $ & $-2 .1$\
N o T iO/ VO m o de l& $ -5 . 3$&  $ -4. 2 $\
[**Note s. ** ]{}
^a^[ B o t h  mod els  for  HAT- P-7b assume s ola r me t all icity .]{}
^b^ [B asedon a $ 2\sig ma $ upper limit o f th e minimum  fl ux  ra ti o.]{} 
^c^[D iff ere nce bet ween ma x imu ma n d  m inimum flux ratios .] { } 
^d^[Themaximu m  a nd minimumfl uxoffs e t s are  mea s ur ed relat ive to th ecenterof  secon da ryecl ipset imeand ce nter oftrans i t time, respec t ively. Negati v et i me offs ets  indicate a n ea s twar d sh i ft  in the l ocati on of the hot or cold reg io n in t he pl anet’s atmosp here.]{}
A f t er subtr acti n ga nd dividing ou t the  brightnes s  of thestaralone, i .e., thef l ux measu red  du rin g s e c on dary eclipse, w e ob ta in thepha se vari ati onofthe  r elative p lanet–st ar  f lu xrat io (F i gures \[ li ght cu rve 1\] a n d \[li ghtcu rve2 \] ). Tab les \[t a b: c o mpar is on 1\]and  \ [tab: comp a ris on2\] l ist the i mpo r tant  q ua ntitati ve characteri st ics of the  W ASP -19b a n d  HAT-P-7 b phase curves, respect i vely. B y e xamin ingthe prope rti es ofthe s e phas e curv es, w eobt a i n a b a s ic  pi ct ure of the t emp eratu re  dis tributi on across the plan e ts’  surfaces, fr omwhic h we  ca n  b e gin  t o  in f e r aspects of th e planets’  e n er gy
 model^a^_& $0.131$_& $0.150$\
\
Measured & $<0.030$^b^_& $0.079\pm0.019$\
With_TiO/VO_model &_$0.039$_& $0.042$\
No TiO/VO_model & $0.044$_& $0.045$\
\
Measured & $>0.128$^b^_& $0.116^{+0.018}_{-0.019}$\
With TiO/VO_model_& $0.121$ & $0.151$\
No TiO/VO model &$0.089$ & $0.105$\
\
Measured & $1.0\pm 1.1$ & $0.6\pm_1.1$\
With_TiO/VO model_&_$-1.1$_& $-1.1$\
No TiO/VO model &_$-3.2$ & $-3.2$\
\
Measured & $1.1^{+1.5}_{-1.6}$_& $0.6^{+1.5}_{-1.7}$\
With_TiO/VO model & $-3.2$ & $-2.1$\
No TiO/VO model_&_$-5.3$ & $-4.2$\

[**Notes.**]{}

^a^[Both_models for HAT-P-7b assume solar metallicity.]{}

^b^[Based on a $2\sigma$_upper limit of the minimum flux_ratio.]{}

^c^[Difference between maximum_and_minimum_flux ratios.]{}

^d^[The maximum and_minimum flux offsets are measured relative_to the center of secondary eclipse_time and center of transit time, respectively._Negative time offsets indicate an eastward_shift in the location of_the hot_or cold region in the_planet’s atmosphere.]{}

After subtracting_and dividing_out the brightness_of the star alone, i.e., the_flux measured during_secondary eclipse, we obtain the phase_variation_of the relative_planet–star_flux_ratio (Figures \[lightcurve1\]_and \[lightcurve2\]). Tables \[tab:comparison1\]_and_\[tab:comparison2\] list_the_important quantitative characteristics of the WASP-19b_and_HAT-P-7b phase curves, respectively. By examining the_properties of these phase_curves,_we obtain a basic_picture of the temperature distribution_across the planets’ surfaces, from which_we can_begin to_infer aspects of the planets’ energy