gamma_{1}^{r(I)}\chi_{A_{I}}\text{, \ }w_{\alpha}={\displaystyle\sum\limits_{I\in\mathcal{S}}}
\lambda_{2}\gamma_{2}^{r(I)}\chi_{A_{I}}$$ we have for any $I\in\mathcal{S}$ $$\frac{w_{\alpha}(I)[w_{\alpha}^{-\frac{1}{p-1}}(I)]^{p-1}}{\mu(I)^{p}}=\frac{\alpha^{p}}{[1-\gamma_{2}(1-\alpha)][1-\gamma_{2}^{-\frac{1}{p-1}}(1-\alpha)]}$$ thus $w_{\alpha}$ is an $A_{p}$ weight but with respect to the *tree* $\mathcal{S}_{\alpha}$ on $(X,\mu)$ and with $[w_{\alpha}]_{p}$ equal to the right hand side of the above relation. Moreover$$M_{\mathcal{S}}\phi_{\alpha}\geq{\displaystyle\sum\limits_{I\in\mathcal{S}}}
\frac{1}{\mu(I)}\int_{I}\phi_{a}d\mu\chi_{A_{I}}=\frac{\alpha}{1-\gamma
(1-\alpha)}\phi_{\alpha}\text{.}$$ However the values of such functions on each $A_{I}$ where $r(I)=m$ is of the form $$\gamma_{m}=\frac{\lambda}{\alpha(1-\alpha)^{m}}\int_{(1-\alpha)^{m+1}}^{(1-\alpha)^{m}}u^{s}du\label{e16}$$ for some real numbers $\lambda,s>0$ and as it is proved in Lemma 3 of [@Mel5] these behave like functions of the form $\lambda t^{s}$ on $(0,1]$ as we approach the limit $\alpha\rightarrow0^{+}$. Hence by taking a sequence $\alpha_{m}\rightarrow0$ considering the trees $\mathcal{T}_{m}=\mathcal{S}_{\alpha_{m}}$ on $(X,\mu)$ and using the construction for the lower bound in the proof of Theorem 2, choosing the constants $k,b$ ($-1<b<p-1$) appropriately in (\[Ap4\]) according to the conditions $a=\frac{1}{p-1-b}$, $c=ka$, $\frac{k}{b+1}=z$, $\frac{1
gamma_{1}^{r(I)}\chi_{A_{I}}\text {, \ } w_{\alpha}={\displaystyle\sum\limits_{I\in\mathcal{S } } } 
 \lambda_{2}\gamma_{2}^{r(I)}\chi_{A_{I}}$$ we have for any $ I\in\mathcal{S}$ $ $ \frac{w_{\alpha}(I)[w_{\alpha}^{-\frac{1}{p-1}}(I)]^{p-1}}{\mu(I)^{p}}=\frac{\alpha^{p}}{[1-\gamma_{2}(1-\alpha)][1-\gamma_{2}^{-\frac{1}{p-1}}(1-\alpha)]}$$ thus $ w_{\alpha}$ is an $ A_{p}$ weight but with respect to the * tree * $ \mathcal{S}_{\alpha}$ on $ (X,\mu)$ and with $ [ w_{\alpha}]_{p}$ adequate to the proper hand side of the above relation back. Moreover$$M_{\mathcal{S}}\phi_{\alpha}\geq{\displaystyle\sum\limits_{I\in\mathcal{S } } } 
 \frac{1}{\mu(I)}\int_{I}\phi_{a}d\mu\chi_{A_{I}}=\frac{\alpha}{1-\gamma 
 (1-\alpha)}\phi_{\alpha}\text{.}$$ However the value of such functions on each $ A_{I}$ where $ r(I)=m$ is of the form $ $ \gamma_{m}=\frac{\lambda}{\alpha(1-\alpha)^{m}}\int_{(1-\alpha)^{m+1}}^{(1-\alpha)^{m}}u^{s}du\label{e16}$$ for some actual numbers $ \lambda, s>0 $ and as it is proved in Lemma 3 of [ @Mel5 ] these act like function of the form $ \lambda t^{s}$ on $ (0,1]$ as we set about the limit $ \alpha\rightarrow0^{+}$. Hence by lead a sequence $ \alpha_{m}\rightarrow0 $ considering the trees $ \mathcal{T}_{m}=\mathcal{S}_{\alpha_{m}}$ on $ (X,\mu)$ and use the construction for the lower bound in the proof of Theorem 2, choose the constants $ k, b$ ($ -1 < b < p-1 $) appropriately in (\[Ap4\ ]) according to the weather $ a=\frac{1}{p-1 - b}$, $ c = ka$, $ \frac{k}{b+1}=z$, $ \frac{1
gamla_{1}^{r(I)}\chi_{A_{I}}\text{, \ }w_{\alpha}={\disklaystyle\sum\limits_{I\in\matical{S}}}
\lajbda_{2}\gammx_{2}^{r(I)}\chi_{A_{I}}$$ we have for any $I\in\larhcal{W}$ $$\frac{w_{\alpha}(I)[w_{\alpha}^{-\fraz{1}{p-1}}(I)]^{p-1}}{\mu(I)^{p}}=\fgac{\alpha^{p}}{[1-\tamme_{2}(1-\alpha)][1-\gamma_{2}^{-\frac{1}{p-1}}(1-\empha)]}$$ thmf $w_{\amiha}$ iv an $A_{p}$ weight nut with revpect to the *tsed* $\lathcal{S}_{\alpha}$ on $(X,\mu)$ and with $[w_{\alphw}]_{p}$ equak ho the right hwnd xyde kf the above relation. Moreover$$M_{\matgcal{S}}\php_{\alpha}\geq{\displaysyyle\sum\limits_{I\in\mathcal{S}}}
\frwc{1}{\mu(L)}\int_{I}\phi_{a}d\mu\chi_{A_{I}}=\fgac{\alpha}{1-\gamna
(1-\al[ya)}\phi_{\alpha}\tebt{.}$$ However the values kf such functions on each $A_{I}$ whdre $r(N)=m$ is of thg rogk $$\gamma_{m}=\frar{\lambdw}{\alpha(1-\alpha)^{m}}\lmt_{(1-\alphd)^{m+1}}^{(1-\alpha)^{k}}u^{s}du\label{e16}$$ fov somx reql numbers $\lambda,s>0$ anv as it is proved in Lemma 3 ox [@Jel5] these behave oije futctimns ud tfe rocm $\mambda t^{s}$ on $(0,1]$ as we approach tye limit $\alpha\rightsrwiw0^{+}$. Hence by tzking w fequence $\alpha_{m}\rightarrow0$ considering tve frees $\mathcal{T}_{m}=\mathcal{S}_{\qlpha_{m}}$ on $(X,\mu)$ and usijg the cogstruction for the lower bound in the proof of Thaorem 2, chiofkbg the constants $k,b$ ($-1<b<p-1$) appropriately in (\[Ap4\]) accowsimg to the conditlons $a=\frac{1}{p-1-b}$, $c=ka$, $\ftaf{k}{n+1}=e$, $\frac{1
gamma_{1}^{r(I)}\chi_{A_{I}}\text{, \ }w_{\alpha}={\displaystyle\sum\limits_{I\in\mathcal{S}}} \lambda_{2}\gamma_{2}^{r(I)}\chi_{A_{I}}$$ we have for $$\frac{w_{\alpha}(I)[w_{\alpha}^{-\frac{1}{p-1}}(I)]^{p-1}}{\mu(I)^{p}}=\frac{\alpha^{p}}{[1-\gamma_{2}(1-\alpha)][1-\gamma_{2}^{-\frac{1}{p-1}}(1-\alpha)]}$$ $w_{\alpha}$ is $A_{p}$ weight but $\mathcal{S}_{\alpha}$ $(X,\mu)$ and with equal to the hand side of the above relation. \frac{1}{\mu(I)}\int_{I}\phi_{a}d\mu\chi_{A_{I}}=\frac{\alpha}{1-\gamma (1-\alpha)}\phi_{\alpha}\text{.}$$ However the values of such functions on each $A_{I}$ where $r(I)=m$ of the form $$\gamma_{m}=\frac{\lambda}{\alpha(1-\alpha)^{m}}\int_{(1-\alpha)^{m+1}}^{(1-\alpha)^{m}}u^{s}du\label{e16}$$ for some real numbers $\lambda,s>0$ and as it is in 3 [@Mel5] behave like functions of the form $\lambda t^{s}$ on $(0,1]$ as we approach the limit $\alpha\rightarrow0^{+}$. by taking a sequence $\alpha_{m}\rightarrow0$ considering the trees on $(X,\mu)$ and using construction for the lower bound the of Theorem choosing constants ($-1<b<p-1$) appropriately in according to the conditions $a=\frac{1}{p-1-b}$, $c=ka$, $\frac{k}{b+1}=z$, $\frac{1
gamma_{1}^{r(I)}\chi_{A_{I}}\text{, \ }w_{\alpha}={\disPlaystyle\sUm\limIts_{i\in\MaThcaL{S}}}
\laMbda_{2}\gamma_{2}^{r(I)}\chi_{a_{i}}$$ we hAve for any $I\in\mathcal{S}$ $$\frAc{w_{\alPhA}(i)[w_{\alPHa}^{-\Frac{1}{p-1}}(i)]^{p-1}}{\mu(I)^{p}}=\fRAc{\ALPha^{P}}{[1-\gAmMa_{2}(1-\aLpHA)][1-\gAmma_{2}^{-\fRac{1}{P-1}}(1-\alpha)]}$$ tHus $w_{\alpha}$ iS an $a_{p}$ Weight but witH ReSpect to the *TreE* $\mathcal{S}_{\alpHa}$ oN $(X,\mu)$ anD wIth $[W_{\Alpha}]_{P}$ eqUal to The rigHT hand sIde of the aBoVE relatIOn. MoreoVER$$M_{\MathCal{S}}\phi_{\alpha}\geq{\diSPlAYstyle\sum\limitS_{I\in\maThCAl{s}}}
\FRac{1}{\Mu(I)}\Int_{I}\phi_{a}d\mU\cHi_{A_{I}}=\fRAc{\alpha}{1-\GAmMA
(1-\ALphA)}\Phi_{\alpha}\text{.}$$ HOwever the vaLUes Of such FuNctIOns on eAch $A_{I}$ WhERe $r(i)=m$ is of the foRm $$\gaMma_{m}=\frac{\lAmbda}{\aLPha(1-\alphA)^{M}}\int_{(1-\alpHa)^{m+1}}^{(1-\alpHa)^{m}}U^{s}dU\labEL{e16}$$ FoR soMe REal NUmBerS $\LamBda,s>0$ and aS iT iS provEd in lEMMA 3 of [@MEl5] tHese BehavE like functionS of The fORm $\lAmbda T^{s}$ on $(0,1]$ aS we aPpRoach The limIt $\alpHa\Rightarrow0^{+}$. Hence By taKing a sequEncE $\aLphA_{m}\RightARrow0$ coNsiDerIng the tRees $\matHCal{t}_{m}=\MATHcAl{S}_{\alpha_{m}}$ on $(X,\mu)$ and uSiNG ThE construCtion fOR tHe LOwer bounD iN thE proOF Of TheOrem 2, CHoOsing the ConstaNTs $K,b$ ($-1<B<p-1$) approPrIately In (\[ap4\]) aCcoRding TO the ConditIons $a=\fraC{1}{p-1-b}$, $c=kA$, $\Frac{k}{b+1}=z$, $\frac{1
gamma_{1}^{r(I)}\chi_{A_{I }}\text{,\ }w_ {\a lph a} ={\d ispl aystyle\sum\li m its_ {I\in\mathcal{S}}}
\la mbda_ {2 } \gam m a_ {2}^{ r(I)}\c h i_ { A _{I }} $$  we  h a ve  forany  $I\in\ mathcal{S} $ $ $\ frac{w_{\alp h a} (I)[w_{\al pha }^{-\frac{1} {p- 1}}(I) ]^ {p- 1 }}{\m u(I )^{p} }=\fra c {\alph a^{p}}{[1 -\ g amma_{ 2 }(1-\al p h a) ][1- \gamma_{2}^{-\fra c {1 } {p-1}}(1-\alph a)]}$$  t h us $ w_{ \al pha}$ is a n$A_{p } $ weigh t  b u t wit h  respect to t he *tree* $ \ mat hcal{S }_ {\a l pha}$on $( X, \ mu) $ and with$[w_ {\alpha}] _{p}$e qual to the rig ht han d s ide  oft he  a bov er ela t io n.M ore over$$M_ {\ ma thcal {S}} \ p h i _{\a lph a}\g eq{\d isplaystyle\s um\ limi t s_{ I\in\ mathc al{S }} }
\fr ac{1}{ \mu(I )} \int_{I}\phi_{a }d\m u\chi_{A_ {I} }= \fr ac {\alp h a}{1-\ gam ma(1-\alp ha)}\ph i _{\ al p h a }\ text{.}$$ Howeverth e va lues ofsuch f u nc ti o ns on ea ch  $A _{I} $ where  $r( I )= m$ is of  the f o rm  $ $\gamma _{ m}=\fr ac {\l amb da}{\ a lpha (1-\al pha)^{m} }\int _ {(1-\alpha)^{m + 1}}^{(1-\alph a )^ { m }} u ^{s} du\ label{e16}$ $ fo r  som e re a lnum b ers $ \lamb da , s> 0 $ and as it is prov ed  in Le mma 3  of [@Mel5] t hese behav e l ike func tion s  o f  the form $\la mbdat^{s}$ on$ (0,1]$ a s weapproach  the limi t $\alpha\ rig hta rro w0^ { + }$ . Hence by ta k i ng a  s equence  $\ alpha_{ m}\ rig hta rro w0 $ conside ring the  t re es  $ \ma thcal { T}_{m}=\ ma thc al {S} _{\al p ha_{m} }$ on  $(X ,\ mu ) $ a nd usin g  t h e  con st ru ctio n f or  thelowe r  bo und inthe proof  of Theo re m2, choo sing the cons ta nts $k,b$($ -1< b<p-1$ ) appropri ately in (\[Ap4\]) acco r ding to  th e con diti ons $a=\f rac {1}{p- 1-b } $, $c= ka$, $ \frac {k }{b + 1 }=z$, $ \f rac {1 
gamma_{1}^{r(I)}\chi_{A_{I}}\text{, \_}w_{\alpha}={\displaystyle\sum\limits_{I\in\mathcal{S}}}
\lambda_{2}\gamma_{2}^{r(I)}\chi_{A_{I}}$$ we_have for any $I\in\mathcal{S}$_$$\frac{w_{\alpha}(I)[w_{\alpha}^{-\frac{1}{p-1}}(I)]^{p-1}}{\mu(I)^{p}}=\frac{\alpha^{p}}{[1-\gamma_{2}(1-\alpha)][1-\gamma_{2}^{-\frac{1}{p-1}}(1-\alpha)]}$$ thus_$w_{\alpha}$_is an_$A_{p}$_weight but with_respect to the_*tree* $\mathcal{S}_{\alpha}$ on $(X,\mu)$_and with $[w_{\alpha}]_{p}$_equal_to the right hand side of the above relation. Moreover$$M_{\mathcal{S}}\phi_{\alpha}\geq{\displaystyle\sum\limits_{I\in\mathcal{S}}}
\frac{1}{\mu(I)}\int_{I}\phi_{a}d\mu\chi_{A_{I}}=\frac{\alpha}{1-\gamma
(1-\alpha)}\phi_{\alpha}\text{.}$$ However the values of_such_functions on_each_$A_{I}$_where $r(I)=m$ is of the_form $$\gamma_{m}=\frac{\lambda}{\alpha(1-\alpha)^{m}}\int_{(1-\alpha)^{m+1}}^{(1-\alpha)^{m}}u^{s}du\label{e16}$$ for some real_numbers $\lambda,s>0$_and as it is proved in Lemma 3_of_[@Mel5] these behave_like functions of the form $\lambda t^{s}$ on $(0,1]$_as we approach the limit $\alpha\rightarrow0^{+}$._Hence by taking_a_sequence_$\alpha_{m}\rightarrow0$ considering the trees_$\mathcal{T}_{m}=\mathcal{S}_{\alpha_{m}}$ on $(X,\mu)$ and using the_construction for the lower bound in_the proof of Theorem 2, choosing the_constants $k,b$ ($-1<b<p-1$) appropriately in (\[Ap4\])_according to the conditions $a=\frac{1}{p-1-b}$,_$c=ka$, $\frac{k}{b+1}=z$,_$\frac{1