 described below. The transmission not only depends on the phase, frequency, and amplitude of the oscillation, but also on the coefficients $a_n$ and $b_n$ determined by the state selectors, and the horizontal velocity distribution $\eta_v$. Here, we assume $a_n\approx b_n$, which is valid in our experiment within $\sim 10\%$. Then, from $\sum_n a_n=1$ and $\sum_n |C_{n}(\tau_1)|^2=|C_{2}(\tau_1)|^2=1$ after the first state selector, it follows that the relative amplitude $\gamma$ of the $|2\rangle\leftrightarrow|4\rangle$ Ramsey fringes is mainly determined by the fraction $(a_2+a_4)/\sum_j a_j$ of states at $t=\tau_1$ that participate in the excitation process. As noted in [Section \[sec:theory\]]{} already, we know that $a_4\approx0$, leaving $a_2$ as single parameter determining the amplitude of the Ramsey fringe. As is illustrated in [Fig. \[fig:setup\_schematic\]]{}, other states (mainly $|1\rangle$ and $|3\rangle$) will pass through the setup unaffected by the oscillation. These states create a background (offset) in the relative transmission. As argued in [Section \[sec:theory\]]{}, we can restrict ourselves to a two-state approximation [@Abele:2012]. Hence, only $C_{2}({\tau}_4)$ and $C_{4}({\tau}_4)$ are determined by [Eqn. (\[eq:transmission\_coefficients\])]{}, describing the Ramsey fringe dependence on ${\alpha}$, while all other states are ignored. Under these assumptions, $P$ would result in a Ramsey fringe of amplitude $\sim 1$. In order to account for the contributions of other states (again, mainly $|1\rangle$ and $|3\rangle$) as well as losses, we introduce an amplitude parameter $\gamma$, and an offset $r_{off}$ to scale and shift the theoretical curve [^7]. Eventually, this results in the fit function $$\begin{aligned}
 &P_{\hspace{-0.5pt}fit}({\alpha},\hspace{-0.5pt}\gamma,\hspace{-0.5pt}r_{off})\hspace{-1pt}=\hspace{-1pt}r_{off}\
described below. The transmission not only depend on the phase, frequency, and amplitude of the cycle, but also on the coefficients $ a_n$ and $ b_n$ determine by the country selectors, and the horizontal velocity distribution $ \eta_v$. Here, we bear $ a_n\approx b_n$, which is valid in our experiment within $ \sim 10\%$. Then, from $ \sum_n a_n=1 $ and $ \sum_n |C_{n}(\tau_1)|^2=|C_{2}(\tau_1)|^2=1 $ after the first state picker, it follow that the proportional amplitude $ \gamma$ of the $ |2\rangle\leftrightarrow|4\rangle$ Ramsey fringes is mainly determine by the fraction $ (a_2+a_4)/\sum_j a_j$ of country at $ t=\tau_1 $ that participate in the excitation process. As noted in [ Section   \[sec: theory\ ] ] { } already, we acknowledge that $ a_4\approx0 $, leaving $ a_2 $ as single parameter specify the amplitude of the Ramsey fringe. As is illustrated in [ Fig.   \[fig: setup\_schematic\ ] ] { }, other states (chiefly $ |1\rangle$ and $ |3\rangle$) will pass through the frame-up unaffected by the oscillation. These states make a background (offset) in the relative transmission. As argued in [ Section   \[sec: theory\ ] ] { }, we can restrict ourselves to a two - state approximation   [ @Abele:2012 ]. Hence, only $ C_{2}({\tau}_4)$ and $ C_{4}({\tau}_4)$ are determined by [ Eqn.   (\[eq: transmission\_coefficients\ ]) ] { }, describing the Ramsey fringe dependence on $ { \alpha}$, while all other states are ignore. Under these assumptions, $ P$ would result in a Ramsey bang of amplitude $ \sim 1$. In order to account for the contributions of other country (again, mainly $ |1\rangle$ and $ |3\rangle$) as well as losses, we introduce an amplitude argument $ \gamma$, and an offset $ r_{off}$ to scale and shift the theoretical curve   [ ^7 ]. Eventually, this results in the fit function $ $ \begin{aligned } 
  & P_{\hspace{-0.5pt}fit}({\alpha},\hspace{-0.5pt}\gamma,\hspace{-0.5pt}r_{off})\hspace{-1pt}=\hspace{-1pt}r_{off}\
 dedcribed below. The transmlssion not only bwpends on ths phase, wrequency, and amplitude of tie owcillqtion, but also on the zoefficiejts $a_n$ abd $b_i$ determined by vge statc selsgtors, end the horizonjal velocity distribution $\atx_v$. Here, we assume $a_n\approx b_n$, which if valid ij our experimegt wptrin $\apm 10\%$. Then, from $\sum_n a_n=1$ and $\sum_n |D_{n}(\tau_1)|^2=|C_{2}(\teu_1)|^2=1$ after the fitst state selector, it folllws hhat the relative wmplitude $\gqmma$ if the $|2\rangld\leftrightarrow|4\rangle$ Tamsey fringes is mainly determived bv the fractuob $(a_2+w_4)/\vum_j a_j$ of wtatef at $t=\tau_1$ that partiwipate on the excitatlon pcocews. As noted in [Sectioi \[sec:theory\]]{} already, wg know thad $c_4\approx0$, leaving $a_2$ as wibgle karamater eetdrmjnmng the alplmtude of ths Ramsey frunge. As is illustraued pm [Fig. \[fig:setul\_schemwtyc\]]{}, other states (mainly $|1\rangle$ and $|3\ranglt$) wilm pass through the setup unaffected by the odcillatiog. These states create a background (offset) in the selatmvd txqnsmirwiln. As argued in [Section \[sec:theory\]]{}, we can restrydt olrselves to a two-ftate approcilayyon [@Abele:2012]. Hencg, only $E_{2}({\fah}_4)$ and $C_{4}({\tau}_4)$ are detfrmined by [Ewn. (\[eq:transiissoon\_coefficients\])]{}, describing rhe Ramsey fgingw dependence on ${\al'ha}$, while alu otner syates are ignored. Under theae assumptilns, $P$ wouma result in a Raosej frhnge of amplitude $\sim 1$. In jrder to eccouut for tfe cpntribttions of lther states (again, mainlj $|1\ranyle$ atd $|3\rangle$) ws well as losses, we introduce ei amplitude psrdmener $\gamma$, and sn offset $r_{ofs}$ to scale and shift che thdoretical burve [^7]. Eveitually, this results in tvg fit functioi $$\begin{alygnee}
 &P_{\hwpace{-0.5pt}wkt}({\alpha},\hspace{-0.5py}\gamma,\hspcee{-0.5pt}r_{off})\hwpace{-1pt}=\hspace{-1pt}r_{ofn}\
described below. The transmission not only depends phase, and amplitude the oscillation, but and determined by the selectors, and the velocity distribution $\eta_v$. Here, we assume b_n$, which is valid in our experiment within $\sim 10\%$. Then, from $\sum_n and $\sum_n |C_{n}(\tau_1)|^2=|C_{2}(\tau_1)|^2=1$ after the first state selector, it follows that the relative $\gamma$ the Ramsey is mainly determined by the fraction $(a_2+a_4)/\sum_j a_j$ of states at $t=\tau_1$ that participate in the process. As noted in [Section \[sec:theory\]]{} already, we that $a_4\approx0$, leaving $a_2$ single parameter determining the amplitude the fringe. As illustrated [Fig. other states (mainly and $|3\rangle$) will pass through the setup unaffected by the oscillation. These states create a background (offset) the relative argued in \[sec:theory\]]{}, can ourselves to a [@Abele:2012]. Hence, only $C_{2}({\tau}_4)$ and $C_{4}({\tau}_4)$ [Eqn. (\[eq:transmission\_coefficients\])]{}, describing the Ramsey fringe dependence on while all states are ignored. Under these assumptions, would result in a Ramsey fringe of amplitude 1$. In order to account for the contributions of other states (again, mainly $|1\rangle$ and well as losses, we an amplitude parameter and offset to and shift theoretical curve [^7]. Eventually, this results in the fit function $$\begin{aligned}
 described below. The transmisSion not onlY depeNds On tHe PhasE, freQuency, and ampliTUde oF the oscillation, but also On the CoEFficIEnTs $a_n$ aNd $b_n$ detERmINEd bY tHe StaTe SElEctorS, anD the horIzontal velOciTy Distribution $\ETa_V$. Here, we assUme $A_n\approx b_n$, whIch Is valiD iN ouR ExperImeNt witHin $\sim 10\%$. tHen, froM $\sum_n a_n=1$ anD $\sUM_n |C_{n}(\taU_1)|^2=|c_{2}(\tau_1)|^2=1$ aftER ThE firSt state selector, it FOlLOws that the relaTive amPlITuDE $\GamMa$ oF the $|2\rangle\LeFtrigHTarrow|4\rANgLE$ rAmsEY fringes is maiNly determinED by The fraCtIon $(A_2+A_4)/\sum_j a_J$ of stAtES at $T=\tau_1$ that parTiciPate in the ExcitaTIon procESs. As notEd in [SeCtiOn \[sEc:thEOrY\]]{} aLreAdY, We kNOw ThaT $A_4\apProx0$, leavInG $a_2$ As sinGle pARAMEter DetErmiNing tHe amplitude of The ramsEY frInge. AS is ilLustRaTed in [fig. \[fig:Setup\_ScHematic\]]{}, other staTes (mAinly $|1\rangLe$ aNd $|3\RanGlE$) will PAss thrOugH thE setup uNaffectED by ThE OSCiLlation. These states CrEATe A backgroUnd (offSEt) In THe relatiVe TraNsmiSSIon. As ArguED iN [Section \[Sec:theORy\]]{}, We Can restRiCt oursElVes To a Two-stATe apProximAtion [@AbeLe:2012]. HenCE, only $C_{2}({\tau}_4)$ and $C_{4}({\tAU}_4)$ are determineD By [eQN. (\[eQ:TranSmiSsion\_coeffiCienTS\])]{}, desCribINg The rAmsey FringE dEPeNDence on ${\alpha}$, while alL oTher stAtes aRe ignored. UndeR these assuMPTIons, $P$ wouLd reSUlT In a Ramsey fringE of amPlitude $\sim 1$. iN order to AccouNt for the ContributIONs of otheR stAteS (agAin, MAInLy $|1\rangle$ and $|3\raNGLe$) as WeLl as losSes, We introDucE an AmpLitUdE parameteR $\gamma$, anD aN oFfSeT $r_{oFf}$ to sCAle and shIfT thE tHeoReticAL curve [^7]. eventUallY, tHiS ResUlts in tHE fIT FuncTiOn $$\BegiN{alIgNed}
 &P_{\hSpacE{-0.5Pt}fIt}({\alpha},\Hspace{-0.5pt}\gAmmA,\HspaCe{-0.5Pt}R_{off})\hspAce{-1pt}=\hspace{-1pt}R_{oFf}\
 described below. The tran smission n ot on lydep en ds o n th e phase, frequ e ncy,  and amplitude of theoscil la t ion, bu t als o on th e  c o e ffi ci en ts$a _ n$  and$b_ n$ dete rmined bythe  s tate selecto r s,  and the h ori zontal veloc ity  distr ib uti o n $\e ta_ v$. H ere, w e  assum e $a_n\ap pr o x b_n$ ,  whichi s  v alid  in our experimen t  w i thin $\sim 10\ %$. Th en ,  f r o m $ \su m_n a_n=1$  a nd $\ s um_n |C _ {n } ( \ tau _ 1)|^2=|C_{2}( \tau_1)|^2= 1 $ a fter t he  fi r st sta te se le c tor , it follow s th at the re lative amplitu d e $\gam ma$ of  th e $ |2\r a ng le \le ft r igh t ar row | 4\r angle$ R am se y fri nges i s main lydete rmine d by the frac tio n $( a _2+ a_4)/ \sum_ j a_ j$  of s tatesat $t =\ tau_1$ that par tici pate in t heex cit at ion p r ocess.  As  no ted in[Sectio n  \[ se c : t he ory\]]{} already,we k no w that $ a_4\ap p ro x0 $ , leavin g$a_ 2$ a s singl e pa r am eter det ermini n gth e ampli tu de ofth e R ams ey fr i nge.  As is  illustr atedi n [Fig. \[fig: s etup\_schemat i c\ ] ] {} ,  oth erstates (mai nly$ |1\r angl e $and $|3\r angle $) wi l l pass through these tup un affec ted by the os cillation. T h ese stat es c r ea t e a background  (off set) in th e  relativ e tra nsmissio n. As arg u e d in [Se cti on\[s ec: t h eo ry\]]{}, we c a n  res tr ict our sel ves toa t wo- sta teap proximati on [@Abe le :2 01 2] . H ence, only $C_ {2 }({ \t au} _4)$a nd $C_ {4}({ \tau }_ 4) $  ar e deter m in e d  by[E qn . (\ [eq :t ransm issi o n\_ coeffic ients\])] {}, desc ri bi ng theRamsey fringe  d ependenceon  ${ \alpha } $ , whileall other states are ig n ored. U nde r the se a ssumption s,$P$ wo uld result  in aRamse yfri n g e ofa m pl itu de  $\sim 1$. I n o rderto  acc ount fo r the contribution s  of  other states  (a gain , ma inl y  $ | 1\r an g le$ a nd $|3\rangle$)  as well a sl os ses, we in t rod uc e an am plitude  para m eter $\ gamma$, a nd an off se t $r _ { off }$ to scal e and sh ift the t h eoret i ca l cur ve[^7].Ev ent ually , this res ultsin the  f it fun ction  $ $\begin{ aligned}
 &P_{\hspace{- 0.5pt} fit}( {\a lpha},\hs pac e {-0 .5pt}\gam ma,\ hspace{-0. 5pt }r_ {off} )\h s pace{ -1pt } =\ hsp a ce{-1 pt}r _ {off}\
 described_below. The_transmission not only depends_on the_phase,_frequency, and_amplitude_of the oscillation,_but also on_the coefficients $a_n$ and_$b_n$ determined by_the_state selectors, and the horizontal velocity distribution $\eta_v$. Here, we assume $a_n\approx b_n$, which_is_valid in_our_experiment_within $\sim 10\%$. Then, from_$\sum_n a_n=1$ and $\sum_n |C_{n}(\tau_1)|^2=|C_{2}(\tau_1)|^2=1$_after the_first state selector, it follows that the relative_amplitude_$\gamma$ of the_$|2\rangle\leftrightarrow|4\rangle$ Ramsey fringes is mainly determined by the fraction_$(a_2+a_4)/\sum_j a_j$ of states at $t=\tau_1$_that participate in_the_excitation_process. As noted in_[Section \[sec:theory\]]{} already, we know that $a_4\approx0$,_leaving $a_2$ as single parameter determining_the amplitude of the Ramsey fringe. As_is illustrated in [Fig. \[fig:setup\_schematic\]]{}, other states_(mainly $|1\rangle$ and $|3\rangle$) will_pass through_the setup unaffected by the_oscillation. These states_create a_background (offset) in_the relative transmission. As argued in_[Section \[sec:theory\]]{}, we can_restrict ourselves to a two-state approximation [@Abele:2012]._Hence,_only $C_{2}({\tau}_4)$ and_$C_{4}({\tau}_4)$_are_determined by_[Eqn. (\[eq:transmission\_coefficients\])]{}, describing the_Ramsey_fringe dependence_on_${\alpha}$, while all other states are_ignored._Under these assumptions, $P$ would result in_a Ramsey fringe of_amplitude_$\sim 1$. In order_to account for the contributions_of other states (again, mainly $|1\rangle$_and $|3\rangle$)_as well_as losses, we introduce an amplitude parameter $\gamma$, and an offset_$r_{off}$ to scale and shift the_theoretical curve [^7]. Eventually, this_results in_the_fit function $$\begin{aligned}
_&P_{\hspace{-0.5pt}fit}({\alpha},\hspace{-0.5pt}\gamma,\hspace{-0.5pt}r_{off})\hspace{-1pt}=\hspace{-1pt}r_{off}\