entric radius, exceeding their turnaround radius by $50\%$ or more. These systems have clearly been affected by some mechanism that propelled them onto orbits substantially more energetic than the ones they had followed until turnaround. This mechanism seems to operate preferentially on low-mass satellites, as shown by the dashed histogram in Figure \[fig:rhist\], which corresponds to satellites with stellar masses less than $\sim 3\%$ that of the primary.

![Radial velocity of satellites versus distance to the primary. Velocities are scaled to the virial velocity of the system, distances to the virial radius. Circles denote “associated” satellites; i.e., those that have been [*inside*]{} the virial radius of the primary at some earlier time. Crosses indicate satellites that are on their first approach, and have never been inside $r_{\rm
vir}$. Filled circles indicate associated satellites whose apocentric radii exceed their turnaround radius by at least $25\%$, indicating that their orbital energies have been substantially altered during their evolution. “Crossed” circles correspond to associated satellites that have entered $r_{\rm vir}$ during the last $3$ Gyrs. The curves delineating the top and bottom boundaries of the distribution show the escape velocity of an NFW halo with concentration $c=10$ and $c=20$, respectively. Note that there is one satellite “escaping” the system with positive radial velocity. Solid lines show the trajectories in the $r-V_r$ plane of the two ”ejected” satellites shown in figure \[fig:orbesc\]. Filled squares correspond to the fourteen brightest Milky Way satellites, taken from @vandenbergh99 (complemented with NED data for the Phoenix, Tucana and NGC6822), and plotted assuming that $V_{\rm vir}^{\rm
MW} \sim 109$ km/s and $r_{\rm vir}^{\rm MW}=237$ kpc (see Sales et al 2007). Arrows indicate how the positions of MW satellites in this plot would be altered if our estimate of $V_{\rm vir}^{\rm MW}$ (and, consequently, $r_{\rm vir}^{\rm MW}$) is allowed to vary by $\pm 20\%$.[]{data-label="fig:rvMW"}](figs/letfig3.ps){width="84mm"}

We highlight some of these objects in Figure \[fig:rvMW\], using “filled” circles to denote “associated” satellites whose apocenters
entric radius, exceeding their turnaround radius by $ 50\%$ or more. These system have intelligibly been affected by some mechanism that propelled them onto orbits well more energetic than the ones they had followed until turnaround. This mechanism look to operate preferentially on low - batch satellites, as shown by the dash histogram in Figure   \[fig: rhist\ ], which corresponds to satellites with leading masses less than $ \sim 3\%$ that of the primary. 

! [ Radial velocity of satellites versus distance to the primary. Velocities are scaled to the virial speed of the system, distances to the virial radius. set denote “ associated ” satellite; i.e., those that have been [ * inside * ] { } the virial radius of the primary coil at some earlier prison term. Crosses indicate satellites that are on their inaugural approach, and have never been inside $ r_{\rm 
 vir}$. Filled circles indicate associated satellites whose apocentric radii exceed their turnaround radius by at least $ 25\%$, indicating that their orbital energies have been substantially altered during their evolution. “ Crossed ” circles match to associated satellites that have insert $ r_{\rm vir}$ during the final $ 3 $ Gyrs. The curves delineating the top and bottom boundaries of the distribution usher the escape velocity of an NFW halo with concentration $ c=10 $ and $ c=20 $, respectively. notice that there is one satellite “ escaping ” the system with positive radial velocity. Solid lines show the trajectories in the $ r - V_r$ plane of the two ” ejected ” satellite shown in trope \[fig: orbesc\ ]. Filled squares correspond to the fourteen brightest Milky Way satellite, taken from @vandenbergh99 (complemented with NED data for the Phoenix, Tucana and NGC6822), and plat assuming that $ V_{\rm vir}^{\rm 
 MW } \sim 109 $ km / s and $ r_{\rm vir}^{\rm MW}=237 $ kpc (see Sales et al 2007). Arrows argue how the positions of MW satellite in this plot would be altered if our estimate of $ V_{\rm vir}^{\rm MW}$ (and, consequently, $ r_{\rm vir}^{\rm MW}$) is allow to vary by $ \pm 20\%$.[]{data - label="fig: rvMW"}](figs / letfig3.ps){width="84 millimeter " } 

 We highlight some of these objects in Figure   \[fig: rvMW\ ], using “ filled ” circle to denote “ associated ” satellites whose apocenters
entgic radius, exceeding thelr turnaround rabuus by $50\%$ or mkre. Thesd systems have clearly been effexted vy some mechanism that propellef them obto iebits subsvzntialln mors enexgxtic than the okes they hag followed unthl tbrnaround. This mechanism seems to opqrate pteverentially on low-kwss aatellites, as shown by the dashed gistogrem in Figure \[fig:thist\], which corresponds to satfllites with stellwr masses lgas eyan $\sim 3\%$ thag of the pgnmary.

![Radial velocity of satellites versus aistauce to the kxumagi. Velocities are fcaled to thc virian velocoty of the sysbem, dmstabces to the virial ravius. Circles denote “wssociateg” aatellites; i.e., thowe that hava bedb [*ivsise*]{} tge virlal radius of the primart at some earlier tomq. Crosses indidate swtqllites that are on their first approacv, ahd have never been insiee $r_{\rm
vir}$. Filled circpes indicwte associated satellites whose apocentric radii axceev ghenv gyrjaround radius by at least $25\%$, indicating that trsit prbital energics have been substsnhisjly altered doring tksid evolution. “Crossef” circlgs coreespond tj asxociated satellites that hace entered $r_{\gm vur}$ during the last $3$ Gyrs. The eurves delimeating the top and botcom bohndaries of the distdkbution show the esbape velocity of an NFW halo wyth conceitratnon $c=10$ ana $c=20$, tespectyvely. Note that there is one satelpite “gscapitg” the syshem with positive radial velocivb. Solid lines svow the tralectorles in the $r-V_r$ [lane of the tco ”ejectzd” satdllites shkwn in higure \[fig:orfesc\]. Filled sxoares correspmnd to tre fiurtwen brieftest Milky Wau satellinef, tajen from @vandenbernh99 (coollemented with UTD eata for the Phpenkx, Eubane and TGC6822), and plotded xssjking ghat $V_{\rm viv}^{\rm
OW} \som 109$ km/s and $r_{\rm vir}^{\rk MW}=237$ kpc (see Sales et sl 2007). Arrows indicatq how the posotions of MW satelpites in this pljt would be altered if our estjmate of $G_{\rm vir}^{\rm MW}$ (anq, cokseqoently, $r_{\rm rir}^{\rm MW}$) is allowed to vary by $\pm 20\%$.[]{data-lauel="fig:rvMW"}](figs/letfig3.ps){wudth="84mm"}

We highlight xpme of thesx objests in Ficure \[fig:rvMW\], using “fioled” circles to dtnote “associated” satelljtes wvose wpocenters
entric radius, exceeding their turnaround radius by more. systems have been affected by onto substantially more energetic the ones they followed until turnaround. This mechanism seems operate preferentially on low-mass satellites, as shown by the dashed histogram in Figure which corresponds to satellites with stellar masses less than $\sim 3\%$ that of primary. velocity satellites distance to the primary. Velocities are scaled to the virial velocity of the system, distances to virial radius. Circles denote “associated” satellites; i.e., those have been [*inside*]{} the radius of the primary at earlier Crosses indicate that on first approach, and never been inside $r_{\rm vir}$. Filled circles indicate associated satellites whose apocentric radii exceed their turnaround radius at least that their energies been altered during their circles correspond to associated satellites that vir}$ during the last $3$ Gyrs. The curves the top bottom boundaries of the distribution show escape velocity of an NFW halo with concentration and $c=20$, respectively. Note that there is one satellite “escaping” the system with positive radial lines show the trajectories the $r-V_r$ plane the ”ejected” shown figure \[fig:orbesc\]. squares correspond to the fourteen brightest Milky Way satellites, taken from (complemented with NED data for the Phoenix, Tucana and NGC6822), assuming $V_{\rm vir}^{\rm MW} 109$ km/s and $r_{\rm MW}=237$ (see Sales et al indicate the satellites this would be altered if estimate of $V_{\rm vir}^{\rm MW}$ consequently, $r_{\rm vir}^{\rm MW}$) $\pm 20\%$.[]{data-label="fig:rvMW"}](figs/letfig3.ps){width="84mm"} We highlight some of these objects Figure \[fig:rvMW\], using “filled” circles to denote satellites whose apocenters
entric radius, exceeding theiR turnarounD radiUs bY $50\%$ or MoRe. ThEse sYstems have cleaRLy beEn affected by some mechanIsm thAt PRopeLLeD them Onto orbITs SUBstAnTiAllY mORe EnergEtiC than thE ones they hAd fOlLowed until tuRNaRound. This mEchAnism seems to OpeRate prEfEreNTiallY on Low-maSs sateLLites, aS shown by tHe DAshed hIStogram IN fiGure \[Fig:rhist\], which corrESpONds to satelliteS with sTeLLaR MAssEs lEss than $\sim 3\%$ ThAt of tHE primarY.

![raDIAL veLOcity of satellItes versus dIStaNce to tHe PriMAry. VelOcitiEs ARe sCaled to the vIriaL velocity Of the sYStem, disTAnces to The virIal RadIus. CIRcLeS deNoTE “asSOcIatED” saTellites; I.e., ThOse thAt haVE BEEn [*inSidE*]{} the ViriaL radius of the pRimAry aT SomE earlIer tiMe. CrOsSes inDicate SatelLiTes that are on theIr fiRst approaCh, aNd HavE nEver bEEn insiDe $r_{\Rm
vIr}$. FilleD circleS IndIcATE AsSociated satellites WhOSE aPocentriC radii EXcEeD Their turNaRouNd raDIUs by aT leaST $25\%$, iNdicatinG that tHEiR oRbital eNeRgies hAvE beEn sUbstaNTialLy alteRed durinG theiR Evolution. “CrossED” circles correSPoND To ASsocIatEd satelliteS thaT Have EnteREd $R_{\rm VIr}$ durIng thE lASt $3$ gYrs. The curves delineaTiNg the tOp and Bottom boundarIes of the diSTRIbution sHow tHE eSCape velocity of An NFW Halo with coNCentratiOn $c=10$ anD $c=20$, respecTively. NotE THat there Is oNe sAteLliTE “EsCaping” the systEM With PoSitive rAdiAl velocIty. solId lIneS sHow the traJectorieS iN tHe $R-V_R$ plAne of THe two ”ejeCtEd” sAtEllItes sHOwn in fIgure \[Fig:oRbEsC\]. filLed squaREs CORresPoNd To thE foUrTeen bRighTEst milky WaY satellitEs, tAKen fRoM @vAndenbeRgh99 (complementEd With NED datA fOr tHe PhoeNIX, Tucana aNd NGC6822), and plotted assuming THat $V_{\rm vIr}^{\rM
MW} \siM 109$ km/s And $r_{\rm vir}^{\Rm Mw}=237$ kpc (seE SaLEs et al 2007). arrows IndicAtE hoW THe posITIoNs oF Mw satelliteS IN thIs ploT wOuld Be alterEd if our estimate of $V_{\RM viR}^{\rm MW}$ (and, conseQueNtly, $R_{\RM vIr}^{\rM mW}$) IS alLoWEd tO VAry by $\pm 20\%$.[]{data-labeL="fig:rvMW"}](fiGs/LEtFig3.ps){width="84MM"}

We HiGhlight Some of tHese oBJects in figure \[fig:RvMW\], using “FiLled” CIRclEs to denote “AssociatEd” satelliTEs whoSE aPocenTerS
entric radius, exceeding t heir turna round  ra diu sby $ 50\% $ or more. The s e sy stems have clearly bee n aff ec t ed b y  s ome m echanis m  t h a t p ro pe lle dt he m ont o o rbits s ubstantial lymo re energetic th an the one s t hey had foll owe d unti ltur n aroun d.Thismechan i sm see ms to ope ra t e pref e rential l y  o n lo w-mass satellites ,  a s  shown by thedashed  h i st o g ram  in  Figure \[ fi g:rhi s t\], wh i ch c o rre s ponds to sate llites with ste llar m as ses less t han $ \s i m 3 \%$ that of  the  primary. 

![Ra d ial vel o city of  satel lit esvers u sdi sta nc e  to th e p r ima ry. Velo ci ti es ar e sc a l e d  tothe  vir ial v elocity of th e s yste m , d istan ces t o th eviria l radi us. C ir cles denote “as soci ated” sat ell it es;  i .e.,t hose t hat  ha ve been  [*insi d e*] {} t h evirial radius of t he p ri mary atsome e a rl ie r  time. C ro sse s in d i catesate l li tes that  are o n  t he ir firs tapproa ch , a ndhaven ever  beeninside $ r_{\r m 
vir}$. Filled circles indic a te a ss o ciat edsatelliteswhos e  apo cent r ic  ra d ii ex ceedth e ir turnaround radius b yat lea st $2 5\%$, indicat ing that t h e i r orbita l en e rg i es have been s ubsta ntially al t ered dur ing t heir evo lution. “ C r ossed” c irc les  co rre s p on d to associat e d  sat el lites t hat  have e nte red  $r _{\ rm  vir}$ du ring the  l as t$3 $ G yrs.T he curve sdel in eat ing t h e topand b otto mbo u nda ries of th e dist ri bu tion  sh ow  theesca p e v elocity  of an NF W h a lo w it hconcent ration $c=10$  a nd $c=20$,  r esp ective l y . Note t hat there is one satell i te “esc api ng” t he s ystem wit h p ositiv e r a dial v elocit y. So li d l i n es sh o w  t hetr ajectories i n t he $r -V _r$plane o f the two ”ejected ”  sa tellites show n i n fi g u re  \[ f ig : orb es c \]. F illed squares c orrespondto th e fourteen bri gh test Mi lky Way  sate l lites,taken fro m @vanden be rgh9 9 (co mplemented  with NE D data fo r  theP ho enix,  Tu cana a nd  NG C6822 ), and plo ttedassumi ng  that$V_{\ rm  vir}^{\ rm
MW} \sim 109$ km/s a nd $r_ {\rmvir }^{\rm MW }=2 3 7$kpc (seeSale s et al 20 07) . A rrows  in d icate  how th e p o sitio ns o f  MW satel l it esi n  t his plot wo u l d  be  alte red if our  est imate of $V_{\rmv ir}^{\rm MW}$(and , con seq u entl y,  $r_{\rm vir}^ {\r mM W }$) is a ll owed to var y by $\p m2 0\%$. []{dat a-labe l="fig: r v MW " }](fig s/le tfi g3.ps){wi dth =" 8 4mm"}
We  h i ghligh t so me  of th ese ob j ects i n Figure \[fig:r vMW\] , using “fi lled”  c irclest o de note “asso ciated” sat ellite s wh ose a pocente rs 
entric radius,_exceeding their_turnaround radius by $50\%$_or more._These_systems have_clearly_been affected by_some mechanism that_propelled them onto orbits_substantially more energetic_than_the ones they had followed until turnaround. This mechanism seems to operate preferentially on_low-mass_satellites, as_shown_by_the dashed histogram in Figure \[fig:rhist\],_which corresponds to satellites with_stellar masses_less than $\sim 3\%$ that of the primary.

![Radial_velocity_of satellites versus_distance to the primary. Velocities are scaled to the_virial velocity of the system, distances_to the virial_radius._Circles_denote “associated” satellites; i.e.,_those that have been [*inside*]{} the_virial radius of the primary at_some earlier time. Crosses indicate satellites that_are on their first approach, and_have never been inside $r_{\rm
vir}$._Filled circles_indicate associated satellites whose apocentric_radii exceed their_turnaround radius_by at least_$25\%$, indicating that their orbital energies_have been substantially_altered during their evolution. “Crossed” circles_correspond_to associated satellites_that_have_entered $r_{\rm_vir}$ during the_last_$3$ Gyrs._The_curves delineating the top and bottom_boundaries_of the distribution show the escape velocity_of an NFW halo_with_concentration $c=10$ and $c=20$,_respectively. Note that there is_one satellite “escaping” the system with_positive radial_velocity. Solid_lines show the trajectories in the $r-V_r$ plane of the two_”ejected” satellites shown in figure \[fig:orbesc\]._Filled squares correspond to_the fourteen_brightest_Milky Way satellites,_taken_from @vandenbergh99_(complemented with NED data for the Phoenix,_Tucana and_NGC6822), and plotted assuming that $V_{\rm_vir}^{\rm
MW} \sim 109$ km/s_and_$r_{\rm vir}^{\rm MW}=237$ kpc (see Sales_et al 2007). Arrows indicate how_the positions of MW satellites_in_this_plot would be altered if_our estimate of $V_{\rm vir}^{\rm MW}$_(and, consequently, $r_{\rm_vir}^{\rm MW}$) is allowed to vary by_$\pm_20\%$.[]{data-label="fig:rvMW"}](figs/letfig3.ps){width="84mm"}

We highlight some of these objects_in_Figure \[fig:rvMW\], using “filled” circles to denote_“associated”_satellites_whose apocenters