
(-1,-2) to (-1,-2+1) to (-1+1,-2+1) to (-1+1,-2+1+1);

(2,-4) to (2,-4+2); (2,-4+2) to (2+1,-4+2) to (2+1,-4+2+1); (2+1,-4+2+1) to (2+1,-4+2+1+3) to (2+1+1,-4+2+1+3+1);

at (-3.5,-3.5) [$\alpha + \beta$]{}; at (4.3,-3.5) [$\alpha + \beta$]{}; at (-4.5,2.5) [$\alpha$]{}; at (2.0,2.5) [$-\alpha$]{};

Note that using determinantal formulas,, the formula is equivalent to the determinantal formula by applying the Cauchy-Binet formula indexed by partitions.

We will perform one more transformation of the lattice grid (now with some negative weights) whose nonintersecting path systems compute the same function $f_{\mu/\nu}(\alpha, \beta)$.

Consider the new [*Type 3*]{} lattice grid as in Figure \[fig333\]. Which is essentially the same as the Type 2 grid, but diagonal steps in its 1st quadrant have negative weights $-\alpha$ and all right steps in 4th quadrant have weight $\alpha + \beta$. Points $A_i$ have the same coordinates, but the points $B_i$ on the right half-plane move again as in Type 1 lattice grid, i.e. they have the coordinates $(i - \nu_i, i - \nu_i - 1)$.

By the following two cases we obtain that $$w(A_i \to B_j) = \widetilde{f}^{(i)}_{\mu_i - i,\nu_j - j}.$$ If $\nu_j - j \ge 0$, then $$\widetilde{f}^{(i)}_{\mu_i - i,\nu_j - j} = \sum_k \binom{\mu_i - k - 1}{i-1}\binom{k}{k - \nu_j + j} (\alpha + \beta)^{\mu_i - i - k} \alpha^{k - \nu_j + j}.$$ If $ j - \
(-1,-2) to (-1,-2 + 1) to (-1 + 1,-2 + 1) to (-1 + 1,-2 + 1 + 1); 

 (2,-4) to (2,-4 + 2); (2,-4 + 2) to (2 + 1,-4 + 2) to (2 + 1,-4 + 2 + 1); (2 + 1,-4 + 2 + 1) to (2 + 1,-4 + 2 + 1 + 3) to (2 + 1 + 1,-4 + 2 + 1 + 3 + 1); 

 at (-3.5,-3.5) [ $ \alpha + \beta$ ] { }; at (4.3,-3.5) [ $ \alpha + \beta$ ] { }; at (-4.5,2.5) [ $ \alpha$ ] { }; at (2.0,2.5) [ $ -\alpha$ ] { }; 

 Note that using determinantal formulas, , the formula is equivalent to the determinantal rule by enforce the Cauchy - Binet formula index by partition. 

 We will perform one more transformation of the lattice power system (now with some negative weights) whose nonintersecting way system compute the same function $ f_{\mu/\nu}(\alpha, \beta)$. 

 Consider the new [ * Type 3 * ] { } wicket grid as in Figure \[fig333\ ]. Which is essentially the same as the Type 2 power system, but diagonal steps in its 1st quadrant have negative weight $ -\alpha$ and all right steps in 4th quadrant have weight $ \alpha + \beta$. Points $ A_i$ own the same coordinates, but the points $ B_i$ on the right half - plane motion again as in Type 1 lattice grid, i.e. they have the coordinates $ (i - \nu_i, i - \nu_i - 1)$. 

 By the following two cases we obtain that $ $ w(A_i \to B_j) = \widetilde{f}^{(i)}_{\mu_i - i,\nu_j - j}.$$ If $ \nu_j - j \ge 0 $, then $ $ \widetilde{f}^{(i)}_{\mu_i - i,\nu_j - j } = \sum_k \binom{\mu_i - k - 1}{i-1}\binom{k}{k - \nu_j + j } (\alpha + \beta)^{\mu_i - i - k } \alpha^{k - \nu_j + j}.$$ If $ j - \

(-1,-2) to (-1,-2+1) to (-1+1,-2+1) to (-1+1,-2+1+1);

(2,-4) to (2,-4+2); (2,-4+2) to (2+1,-4+2) to (2+1,-4+2+1); (2+1,-4+2+1) uo (2+1,-4+2+1+3) to (2+1+1,-4+2+1+3+1);

at (-3.5,-3.5) [$\alpha + \beta$]{}; av (4.3,-3.5) [$\alphz + \beta$]{}; xt (-4.5,2.5) [$\alpha$]{}; at (2.0,2.5) [$-\alpha$]{};

Note that uwing eeterminantal formulas,, the formlla is eqyivaownt to the determikcntal normune by applying tme Cauchy-Bitet formula ingebeb by partitions.

We will perform one mjre tramsvormation of tre lsetics grid (now with some negative weiggts) whove nonintersevting path systems compute the same function $f_{\mu/\ju}(\alpha, \betq)$.

Confuder the new [*Type 3*]{} latuiee grid as jn Figure \[fig333\]. Which is essentiauly tke same as jkw Tjke 2 grid, but diagjnal steps ik its 1sd quadrsnt have negatlve wxighrs $-\alpha$ and all righv steps in 4th quadragt have waiyht $\alpha + \beta$. Pointw $Q_i$ haee tve sxne zooddmnafes, buh tie points $B_j$ on the ritht half-plane move sgwpm as in Type 1 lattycq grid, i.e. they have the coordinates $(i - \tu_i, i - \nu_i - 1)$.

By the followibg two cases we obtaij that $$w(A_y \to B_j) = \widetilde{f}^{(i)}_{\mu_i - i,\nu_j - j}.$$ If $\nu_j - j \ge 0$, than $$\wivegilbc{n}^{(i)}_{\mu_k - l,\nu_j - j} = \sum_k \binom{\mu_i - k - 1}{i-1}\binom{k}{k - \nu_j + j} (\ajlhs + \beta)^{\mu_i - i - k} \alpha^{k - \nu_k + j}.$$ Yf $ j - \
(-1,-2) to (-1,-2+1) to (-1+1,-2+1) to (-1+1,-2+1+1); (2,-4+2); to (2+1,-4+2) (2+1,-4+2+1); (2+1,-4+2+1) to [$\alpha \beta$]{}; at (4.3,-3.5) + \beta$]{}; at [$\alpha$]{}; at (2.0,2.5) [$-\alpha$]{}; Note that determinantal formulas,, the formula is equivalent to the determinantal formula by applying the formula indexed by partitions. We will perform one more transformation of the lattice (now some weights) nonintersecting path systems compute the same function $f_{\mu/\nu}(\alpha, \beta)$. Consider the new [*Type 3*]{} lattice grid in Figure \[fig333\]. Which is essentially the same the Type 2 grid, diagonal steps in its 1st have weights $-\alpha$ all steps 4th quadrant have $\alpha + \beta$. Points $A_i$ have the same coordinates, but the points $B_i$ on the right half-plane again as 1 lattice i.e. have coordinates $(i - - \nu_i - 1)$. By the we obtain that $$w(A_i \to B_j) = \widetilde{f}^{(i)}_{\mu_i i,\nu_j - If $\nu_j - j \ge 0$, $$\widetilde{f}^{(i)}_{\mu_i - i,\nu_j - j} = \sum_k \binom{\mu_i k - 1}{i-1}\binom{k}{k - \nu_j + j} (\alpha + \beta)^{\mu_i - i - k} \alpha^{k + j}.$$ If $ - \

(-1,-2) to (-1,-2+1) to (-1+1,-2+1) to (-1+1,-2+1+1);

(2,-4) to (2,-4+2); (2,-4+2) to (2+1,-4+2) to (2+1,-4+2+1); (2+1,-4+2+1) to (2+1,-4+2+1+3) to (2+1+1,-4+2+1+3+1);

at (-3.5,-3.5) [$\alpha + \beTa$]{}; at (4.3,-3.5) [$\alpha + \bEta$]{}; at (-4.5,2.5) [$\AlpHa$]{}; aT (2.0,2.5) [$-\aLpha$]{};

note That using deterMInanTal formulas,, the formula iS equiVaLEnt tO ThE deteRminantAL fORMulA bY aPplYiNG tHe CauChy-binet foRmula indexEd bY pArtitions.

We wILl Perform one MorE transformatIon Of the lAtTicE Grid (nOw wIth soMe negaTIve weiGhts) whose NoNIntersECting paTH SyStemS compute the same fuNCtIOn $f_{\mu/\nu}(\alpha, \beTa)$.

ConsIdER tHE New [*typE 3*]{} lattice grId As in FIGure \[fig333\]. wHiCH IS esSEntially the saMe as the Type 2 GRid, But diaGoNal STeps in Its 1st QuADraNt have negatIve wEights $-\alpHa$ and aLL right sTEps in 4th QuadraNt hAve WeigHT $\aLpHa + \bEtA$. poiNTs $a_i$ hAVe tHe same coOrDiNates, But tHE POInts $b_i$ oN the Right Half-plane move AgaIn as IN TyPe 1 latTice gRid, i.E. tHey haVe the cOordiNaTes $(i - \nu_i, i - \nu_i - 1)$.

By thE folLowing two CasEs We oBtAin thAT $$w(A_i \to b_j) = \wIdeTilde{f}^{(i)}_{\Mu_i - i,\nu_j - J}.$$ if $\nU_j - J \GE 0$, ThEn $$\widetilde{f}^{(i)}_{\mu_i - i,\nU_j - J} = \SUm_K \binom{\mu_I - k - 1}{i-1}\binOM{k}{K - \nU_J + j} (\alpha + \bEtA)^{\mu_I - i - k} \aLPHa^{k - \nu_J + j}.$$ If $ J - \

(-1,-2) to (-1,-2+1) to ( -1+1,-2+1)  to ( -1+ 1,- 2+ 1+1) ;

( 2,-4) to (2,-4 + 2);(2,-4+2) to (2+1,-4+2)  to ( 2+ 1 ,-4+ 2 +1 ); (2 +1,-4+2 + 1) t o ( 2+ 1, -4+ 2+ 1 +3 ) to(2+ 1+1,-4+ 2+1+3+1);
at  ( -3.5,-3.5) [ $ \a lpha + \be ta$ ]{}; at (4.3 ,-3 .5) [$ \a lph a  + \b eta $]{};  at (- 4 .5,2.5 ) [$\alph a$ ] {}; at (2.0,2. 5 )  [ $-\a lpha$]{};

Note t h at using determin antalfo r mu l a s,,  th e formulais  equi v alent t o  t h e det e rminantal for mula by app l yin g theCa uch y -Binet  form ul a  in dexed by pa rtit ions.

We  willp erformo ne more  trans for mat iono fth e l at t ice gr id( now  with so me  n egati ve w e i g h ts)who se n onint ersecting pat h s yste m s c omput e the  sam efunct ion $f _{\mu /\ nu}(\alpha, \be ta)$ .

Consid erth e n ew  [*Ty p e 3*]{ } l att ice gri d as in Fig ur e \ [f ig333\]. Which ises s e nt ially th e same as  t h e Type 2  g rid , bu t diago nals te ps in it s 1stq ua dr ant hav enegati ve  we igh ts $- \ alph a$ and  all rig ht st e ps in 4th quad r ant have weig h t$ \ al p ha +  \b eta$. Point s $A _ i$ h avet he  sa m e coo rdina te s ,b ut the points $B_i$  o n theright  half-plane m ove againa s in Type1 la t ti c e grid, i.e. t hey h ave the co o rdinates  $(i- \nu_i,  i - \nu_ i - 1)$.
Bythe  fo llo w i ng  two cases we o btai nthat $$ w(A _i \toB_j ) =  \w ide ti lde{f}^{( i)}_{\mu _i  -  i ,\ nu_ j - j } .$$ If $ \n u_j  -  j\ge 0 $ , then  $$\w idet il de { f}^ {(i)}_{ \ mu _ i  - i ,\ nu _j -  j}  =  \sum _k \ b ino m{\mu_i  - k - 1} {i- 1 }\bi no m{ k}{k -\nu_j + j} (\ al pha + \bet a) ^{\ mu_i - i  - k} \a lpha^{k - \nu_j + j}.$$ If $ j- \ 

(-1,-2) to_(-1,-2+1) to_(-1+1,-2+1) to (-1+1,-2+1+1);

(2,-4) to_(2,-4+2); (2,-4+2)_to_(2+1,-4+2) to_(2+1,-4+2+1);_(2+1,-4+2+1) to (2+1,-4+2+1+3)_to (2+1+1,-4+2+1+3+1);

at (-3.5,-3.5)_[$\alpha + \beta$]{}; at_(4.3,-3.5) [$\alpha +_\beta$]{};_at (-4.5,2.5) [$\alpha$]{}; at (2.0,2.5) [$-\alpha$]{};

Note that using determinantal formulas,, the formula is equivalent_to_the determinantal_formula_by_applying the Cauchy-Binet formula indexed_by partitions.

We will perform one_more transformation_of the lattice grid (now with some negative_weights)_whose nonintersecting path_systems compute the same function $f_{\mu/\nu}(\alpha, \beta)$.

Consider the new_[*Type 3*]{} lattice grid as in_Figure \[fig333\]. Which_is_essentially_the same as the_Type 2 grid, but diagonal steps_in its 1st quadrant have negative_weights $-\alpha$ and all right steps in_4th quadrant have weight $\alpha +_\beta$. Points $A_i$ have the_same coordinates,_but the points $B_i$ on_the right half-plane_move again_as in Type_1 lattice grid, i.e. they have_the coordinates $(i_- \nu_i, i - \nu_i -_1)$.

By_the following two_cases_we_obtain that_$$w(A_i \to B_j)_=_\widetilde{f}^{(i)}_{\mu_i -_i,\nu_j_- j}.$$ If $\nu_j - j_\ge_0$, then $$\widetilde{f}^{(i)}_{\mu_i - i,\nu_j - j}_= \sum_k \binom{\mu_i -_k_- 1}{i-1}\binom{k}{k - \nu_j_+ j} (\alpha + \beta)^{\mu_i_- i - k} \alpha^{k -_\nu_j +_j}.$$ If_$ j - \