 corresponds to the broken phase. In general the phase diagram depends on four parameters $\beta$, $\gamma$, $\nu$ and $\varphi$. In the $\mathcal{PT}$-symmetric phase only three of these parameters are independent and the phase diagram will contain a connected $3D$ region (symmetric phase) characterized by $F=0$. This is clearly a richer phase diagram than that obtained by using exclusively eigenstates of the S-matrix where the variables $\nu$ and $\varphi$ are eliminated by projecting on the $\beta$, $\gamma$ plane.

Of course, this generalized phase diagram can be obtained using linear combinations of the S-matrix eigenstates since they cover the entire space of possible scattering states. However, to describe the unbroken phase via a linear combination $$\label{lin_comb} \vert\Psi\rangle=\mu_{1}\vert\Phi_{1}\rangle+\mu_{2}\vert\Phi_{2}\rangle,$$ where $\vert \Phi_{i} \rangle,~~i=1,2$ are the S-matrix eigenstates, one has to impose the following conditions (and all their combinations): $$\label{cond} \mu_{1}^{*}=\pm \mu_{1}~~~~;~~~~\mu_{2}^{*}=\pm \mu_{2},$$ for the (in general complex) expansion coefficients $\mu_{i},~~i=1,2$. This information is optimally encoded in the single condition $Q=0$, demonstrating the propriety of the invariant current $Q$ (or equivalently $F$) as an “order parameter” of the $\mathcal{PT}$ breaking transition. Even more, from the physical point of view, in a scattering experiment with incidence on either side of the potential, it is expected that the ratio $\vert \nu \vert$, being a tunable parameter for a given setup, can be varied in an arbitrary manner, influencing the scattering outcome. On the other hand, restricting the incident states to S-matrix eigenstates, fixes the ratio $|\nu|$ to 1 for all the corresponding $\mathcal{PT}$-symmetric states. This can be shown by combining the conditions: $$\label{s_mat_cond} A=s~B~~~;~~~D=s~C,$$ which emerge from the fact that the incoming state is an eigenstate of the S-matrix ($s$ being the respective eigenvalue), with $$\label{s_mat_cond} B^{*}=\Lambda~D~~~;~~~A^{*}=\Lambda~C,$$ which stem from
corresponds to the broken phase. In general the phase diagram depends on four parameters $ \beta$, $ \gamma$, $ \nu$ and $ \varphi$. In the $ \mathcal{PT}$-symmetric phase merely three of these argument are independent and the phase diagram will contain a connected $ 3D$ area (symmetric phase) characterized by $ F=0$. This is clearly a deep phase diagram than that obtained by using entirely eigenstates of the south - matrix where the variables $ \nu$ and $ \varphi$ are rule out by projecting on the $ \beta$, $ \gamma$ plane. 

 Of naturally, this generalized phase diagram can be obtained using linear combinations of the S - matrix eigenstates since they cover the entire outer space of possible scattering states. However, to identify the unbroken phase via a linear combination $ $ \label{lin_comb } \vert\Psi\rangle=\mu_{1}\vert\Phi_{1}\rangle+\mu_{2}\vert\Phi_{2}\rangle,$$ where $ \vert \Phi_{i } \rangle,~~i=1,2 $ are the S - matrix eigenstates, one have to impose the following conditions (and all their combinations ): $ $ \label{cond } \mu_{1}^{*}=\pm \mu_{1}~~~~;~~~~\mu_{2}^{*}=\pm \mu_{2},$$ for the (in general complex) expansion coefficient $ \mu_{i},~~i=1,2$. This information is optimally encoded in the single condition $ Q=0 $, demonstrating the propriety of the invariant current $ Q$ (or equivalently $ F$) as an “ club argument ” of the $ \mathcal{PT}$ breaking transition. Even more, from the physical point of view, in a scattering experiment with incidence on either side of the electric potential, it is expected that the proportion $ \vert \nu \vert$, being a tunable parameter for a given frame-up, can be vary in an arbitrary manner, influencing the scattering outcome. On the early hand, restrict the incident states to S - matrix eigenstates, fix the ratio $ |\nu|$ to 1 for all the corresponding $ \mathcal{PT}$-symmetric states. This can be shown by combining the conditions: $ $ \label{s_mat_cond } A = south ~ B~~~;~~~D = s ~ C,$$ which emerge from the fact that the incoming state is an eigenstate of the S - matrix ($ s$ being the respective eigenvalue), with $ $ \label{s_mat_cond } B^{*}=\Lambda ~ D~~~;~~~A^{*}=\Lambda ~ C,$$ which stem from
 cogresponds to the broken khase. In general jhw phasx diagrzm depenas on four parameters $\beta$, $\gemma$, $\nu$ abd $\varphi$. In the $\mathcxl{PT}$-symmenric phasw onot three of these parametsvs arz mndependent and the phase diagram will wovtcin a connected $3D$ region (symmetric prase) chsrwcterized by $F=0$. Thix is dlearly a richer phase diagram thah that mbtained by uxing exclusively eigenstatfs ov the S-matrix wherf the variavles $\bu$ and $\varphk$ are elimpuated by prkjecting on the $\beta$, $\gamma$ pland.

Of cpurse, this gwnegdlized phasx diaggam can be obbsined gsing lonear combinatlons mf rhe S-matrix eigenstatxs since they cover jhe entire s'ace of possible scatreeing vtatas. Huqevdr, uo vesdribe hhe unbroken lhase via a linear combination $$\lwvel{lin_comb} \vedt\Psi\rwndle=\mu_{1}\vert\Phi_{1}\rangle+\mu_{2}\vert\Phi_{2}\rangle,$$ where $\vedt \Phi_{i} \rangle,~~i=1,2$ are the S-matrix eigenstates, lne has tj impose the following conditions (and all their cmmbinetkonw): $$\jxvep{cond} \mu_{1}^{*}=\pm \mu_{1}~~~~;~~~~\mu_{2}^{*}=\pm \mu_{2},$$ for the (in general complqs) txpsnsion coefficlents $\mu_{i},~~i=1,2$. This ingogmsjion is optimauly enekdsd in the single clnditiog $Q=0$, dwmonstratyng yhe propriety of the invariqnt current $Z$ (or equivalently $F$) as an “ordex paraketer” of the $\mathcal{PT}$ breaknng trznsition. Evfn more, fdum the physical ooikt mf view, in a scattering ex[eriment xith nncidencd on eithew side of hhe potential, it is expefted jhat tve ratio $\vfrt \nu \vert$, being a tunable pareketer for a bieen setup, ccn be yaried in an arfitrary manner, influeucing ghe scatteging outcmme. On the jther hand, revjricting the mncident ftatws ti S-matrkb eigenstates, gixes the ratio $|\nu|$ ro 1 for all the covrespuhding $\mathcal{PT}$-wymnetric states. Tnis cag he srmwn by combiting thd condktions: $$\labeo{r_mat_vond} A=s~B~~~;~~~D=s~C,$$ which emarge from the fact thay bhe incomung statq is an eigenxtate of the S-matrlx ($s$ ueing vhe rexpestive eigenvalue), with $$\label{s_maf_cond} B^{*}=\Lalbdw~D~~~;~~~A^{*}=\Lambda~C,$$ wrich stem from
corresponds to the broken phase. In general diagram on four $\beta$, $\gamma$, $\nu$ phase three of these are independent and phase diagram will contain a connected region (symmetric phase) characterized by $F=0$. This is clearly a richer phase diagram that obtained by using exclusively eigenstates of the S-matrix where the variables $\nu$ $\varphi$ eliminated projecting the $\beta$, $\gamma$ plane. Of course, this generalized phase diagram can be obtained using linear combinations the S-matrix eigenstates since they cover the entire of possible scattering states. to describe the unbroken phase a combination $$\label{lin_comb} where \Phi_{i} are the S-matrix one has to impose the following conditions (and all their combinations): $$\label{cond} \mu_{1}^{*}=\pm \mu_{1}~~~~;~~~~\mu_{2}^{*}=\pm \mu_{2},$$ for the general complex) $\mu_{i},~~i=1,2$. This is encoded the single condition the propriety of the invariant current $F$) as an “order parameter” of the $\mathcal{PT}$ transition. Even from the physical point of view, a scattering experiment with incidence on either side the potential, it is expected that the ratio $\vert \nu \vert$, being a tunable parameter given setup, can be in an arbitrary influencing scattering On other hand, the incident states to S-matrix eigenstates, fixes the ratio $|\nu|$ to for all the corresponding $\mathcal{PT}$-symmetric states. This can be shown the $$\label{s_mat_cond} A=s~B~~~;~~~D=s~C,$$ which from the fact that incoming is an eigenstate of ($s$ the $$\label{s_mat_cond} which from
 corresponds to the broken phaSe. In generaL the pHasE diAgRam dEpenDs on four parameTErs $\bEta$, $\gamma$, $\nu$ and $\varphi$. In tHe $\matHcAL{PT}$-sYMmEtric Phase onLY tHREe oF tHeSe pArAMeTers aRe iNdependEnt and the pHasE dIagram will coNTaIn a connectEd $3D$ Region (symmetRic Phase) cHaRacTErizeD by $f=0$. This Is cleaRLy a ricHer phase dIaGRam thaN That obtAINeD by uSing exclusively eiGEnSTates of the S-matRix wheRe THe VARiaBleS $\nu$ and $\varpHi$ Are elIMinated BY pROJEctINg on the $\beta$, $\gaMma$ plane.

Of cOUrsE, this gEnEraLIzed phAse diAgRAm cAn be obtaineD usiNg linear cOmbinaTIons of tHE S-matriX eigenStaTes SincE ThEy CovEr THe eNTiRe sPAce Of possibLe ScAtterIng sTATES. HowEveR, to dEscriBe the unbroken PhaSe viA A liNear cOmbinAtioN $$\lAbel{lIn_comb} \Vert\PSi\Rangle=\mu_{1}\vert\Phi_{1}\RangLe+\mu_{2}\vert\PHi_{2}\rAnGle,$$ WhEre $\veRT \Phi_{i} \rAngLe,~~i=1,2$ Are the S-Matrix eIGenStATES, oNe has to impose the foLlOWInG conditiOns (and ALl ThEIr combinAtIonS): $$\labEL{Cond} \mU_{1}^{*}=\pm \mU_{1}~~~~;~~~~\Mu_{2}^{*}=\Pm \mu_{2},$$ for tHe (in geNErAl Complex) ExPansioN cOefFicIents $\MU_{i},~~i=1,2$. THis infOrmation Is optIMally encoded in THe single condiTIoN $q=0$, DeMOnstRatIng the proprIety OF the InvaRIaNt cURrent $q$ (or eqUiVAlENtly $F$) as an “order paramEtEr” of thE $\mathCal{PT}$ breaking Transition. eVEN more, froM the PHySIcal point of vieW, in a sCattering eXPeriment With iNcidence On either sIDE of the poTenTiaL, it Is eXPEcTed that the ratIO $\Vert \Nu \Vert$, beiNg a Tunable ParAmeTer For A gIven setup, Can be varIeD iN aN aRbiTrary MAnner, infLuEncInG thE scatTEring oUtcomE. On tHe OtHEr hAnd, restRIcTINg thE iNcIdenT stAtEs to S-MatrIX eiGenstatEs, fixes thE raTIo $|\nu|$ To 1 FoR all the Corresponding $\MaThcal{PT}$-symMeTriC stateS. tHis can be Shown by combining the condITions: $$\laBel{S_mat_cOnd} A=S~B~~~;~~~D=s~C,$$ whicH emErge frOm tHE fact tHat the IncomInG stATE is an EIGeNstAtE of the S-matRIX ($s$ bEing tHe RespEctive eIgenvalue), with $$\label{S_Mat_Cond} B^{*}=\Lambda~D~~~;~~~A^{*}=\lamBda~C,$$ WHIcH stEM fROm
 corresponds to the broken  phase. In  gene ral  th ephas e di agram dependso n fo ur parameters $\beta$,  $\ga mm a $, $ \ nu $ and  $\varp h i$ . Inth e$\m at h ca l{PT} $-s ymmetri c phase on lyth ree of these pa rameters a reindependentand  the p ha sed iagra m w ill c ontain a conn ected $3D $r egion( symmetr i c  p hase ) characterized b y  $ F =0$. This is c learly  a ri c h erpha se diagram  t han t h at obta i ne d b y u s ing exclusive ly eigensta t esof the  S -ma t rix wh ere t he var iables $\nu $ an d $\varph i$ are elimina t ed by p roject ing  on  the $\ be ta$ ,$ \ga m ma $ p l ane .

Of co ur se , thi s ge n e r a lize d p hase  diag ram can be ob tai nedu sin g lin ear c ombi na tions  of th e S-m at rix eigenstates  sin ce they c ove rthe  e ntire spaceofpos sible s catteri n g s ta t e s .However, to descri be t he  unbroke n phas e  v ia a linear  c omb inat i o n $$\ labe l {l in_comb}  \vert \ Ps i\ rangle= \m u_{1}\ ve rt\ Phi _{1}\ r angl e+\mu_ {2}\vert \Phi_ { 2}\rangle,$$ w h ere $\vert \P h i_ { i }\ rang le, ~~i=1,2$ ar e th e  S-m atri x  e ige n state s, on eh as to impose the follo wi ng con ditio ns (and all t heir combi n a t ions): $ $\la b el { cond} \mu_{1}^ {*}=\ pm \mu_{1} ~ ~~~;~~~~ \mu_{ 2}^{*}=\ pm \mu_{2 } , $$ for t he(in  ge ner a l  c omplex) expan s i on c oe fficien ts$\mu_{i },~ ~i= 1,2 $.Th is inform ation is  o pt im al lyencod e d in the  s ing le  co nditi o n $Q=0 $, de mons tr at i ngthe pro p ri e t y of  t he  inv ari an t cur rent $Q$  (or eq uivalentl y $ F $) a san  “order  parameter” o fthe $\math ca l{P T}$ br e a king tra nsition. Even more, fro m  the ph ysi cal p oint  of view,  in  a sca tte r ing ex perime nt wi th  in c i dence o neit he r side oft h e p otent ia l, i t is ex pected that the ra t io$\vert \nu \v ert $, b e i ng  at un a ble  p a ram e t er for a givensetup, can  b e  v aried in a n  ar bi trary m anner,influ e ncing t he scatte ring outc om e. O n the  other han d, restr icting th e  inci d en t sta tes  to S- ma tri x eig enstat e s,fixes  the r at io $|\ nu|$to  1 for a ll the corresponding $\ mathca l{PT} $-s ymmetricsta t es.  This can  beshown by c omb ini ng th e c o nditi ons: $$ \la b el{s_ mat_ c ond} A=s~ B ~~ ~;~ ~ ~ D= s~C,$$ whic h e mer ge fr omt he fac t th at the incoming s t ate is an eige nsta t e  of  th e  S-m at rix ($s$ being  th er e spective  e igenvalue),  with $$ \l a bel{s _mat_c ond} B ^{*}=\L a m bd a ~D~~~; ~~~A ^{* }=\Lambda ~C, $$ which s te mf rom
 corresponds_to the_broken phase. In general_the phase_diagram_depends on_four_parameters $\beta$, $\gamma$,_$\nu$ and $\varphi$._In the $\mathcal{PT}$-symmetric phase_only three of_these_parameters are independent and the phase diagram will contain a connected $3D$ region (symmetric_phase)_characterized by_$F=0$._This_is clearly a richer phase_diagram than that obtained by_using exclusively_eigenstates of the S-matrix where the variables $\nu$_and_$\varphi$ are eliminated_by projecting on the $\beta$, $\gamma$ plane.

Of course, this_generalized phase diagram can be obtained_using linear combinations_of_the_S-matrix eigenstates since they_cover the entire space of possible_scattering states. However, to describe the_unbroken phase via a linear combination $$\label{lin_comb}_\vert\Psi\rangle=\mu_{1}\vert\Phi_{1}\rangle+\mu_{2}\vert\Phi_{2}\rangle,$$ where $\vert \Phi_{i} \rangle,~~i=1,2$ are_the S-matrix eigenstates, one has_to impose_the following conditions (and all_their combinations): $$\label{cond}_\mu_{1}^{*}=\pm \mu_{1}~~~~;~~~~\mu_{2}^{*}=\pm_\mu_{2},$$ for the_(in general complex) expansion coefficients $\mu_{i},~~i=1,2$._This information is_optimally encoded in the single condition_$Q=0$,_demonstrating the propriety_of_the_invariant current_$Q$ (or equivalently_$F$)_as an_“order_parameter” of the $\mathcal{PT}$ breaking transition._Even_more, from the physical point of view,_in a scattering experiment_with_incidence on either side_of the potential, it is_expected that the ratio $\vert \nu_\vert$, being_a tunable_parameter for a given setup, can be varied in an arbitrary_manner, influencing the scattering outcome. On_the other hand, restricting_the incident_states_to S-matrix eigenstates,_fixes_the ratio_$|\nu|$ to 1 for all the corresponding_$\mathcal{PT}$-symmetric states._This can be shown by combining_the conditions: $$\label{s_mat_cond} A=s~B~~~;~~~D=s~C,$$_which_emerge from the fact that the_incoming state is an eigenstate of_the S-matrix ($s$ being the_respective_eigenvalue),_with $$\label{s_mat_cond} B^{*}=\Lambda~D~~~;~~~A^{*}=\Lambda~C,$$ which stem_from