{\partial^{2} \vartheta}{\partial x_{k} \partial x_{i}}}
+\frac{\partial}{\partial x_{k}}
\frac{\partial \rho L_0}
{\partial
\frac{\partial \vartheta}{\partial x_{k} }}
-\frac{\partial \rho L_0}{\partial\vartheta}
-\frac{\hbar \rho}{2}
\left( G_1\cos \varphi - G_2\sin \varphi  \right)
=0
 \label{eq:D6DSV3ARTH}\\
-\frac{\partial}{\partial x_{k}}  \frac{\partial}{\partial x_{i}}
\frac{\partial \rho L_0}
{\partial\
\frac{\partial^{2} \varphi}{\partial x_{k} \partial x_{i}}}
+\frac{\partial}{\partial x_{k}}
\frac{\partial \rho L_0}
{\partial
\frac{\partial \varphi}{\partial x_{k} }}
-\frac{\partial \rho L_0}{\partial\varphi}
-\frac{\hbar }{2} \rho G_3 =0
\label{eq:D9ZSG4PHI}
\mbox{.}\end{gathered}$$ The variable $S$ does not occur in (\[eq:DI2DS8RHO\])-(\[eq:D9ZSG4PHI\]) in agreement with our assumptions about the form of $L_0$. It is easy to see that a proper solution (with vanishing variational contributions from the second order derivatives) of (\[eq:DI2DS8RHO\])-(\[eq:D9ZSG4PHI\]) is given by $$\begin{gathered}
L_0 = \frac{\hbar^{2}}{2m} \bigg[
\frac{1}{\sqrt{\rho}}
\frac{\partial}{\partial \vec{x}} \frac{\partial}{\partial \vec{x}}
\sqrt{\rho}
-\frac{1}{4}\sin^{2} \vartheta
\left( \frac{\partial \varphi}{\partial \vec{x}} \right)^{2}
-\frac{1}{4}
\left( \frac{\partial \vartheta}{\partial \vec{x}} \right)^{2}
\bigg]
 \label{eq:DI3SOLL0HO}
{ \partial^{2 } \vartheta}{\partial x_{k } \partial x_{i } } } 
 + \frac{\partial}{\partial x_{k } } 
 \frac{\partial \rho L_0 } 
 { \partial 
 \frac{\partial \vartheta}{\partial x_{k } } } 
 -\frac{\partial \rho L_0}{\partial\vartheta } 
 -\frac{\hbar \rho}{2 } 
 \left (G_1\cos \varphi - G_2\sin \varphi   \right) 
 = 0 
  \label{eq: D6DSV3ARTH}\\ 
 -\frac{\partial}{\partial x_{k } }   \frac{\partial}{\partial x_{i } } 
 \frac{\partial \rho L_0 } 
 { \partial\ 
 \frac{\partial^{2 } \varphi}{\partial x_{k } \partial x_{i } } } 
 + \frac{\partial}{\partial x_{k } } 
 \frac{\partial \rho L_0 } 
 { \partial 
 \frac{\partial \varphi}{\partial x_{k } } } 
 -\frac{\partial \rho L_0}{\partial\varphi } 
 -\frac{\hbar } { 2 } \rho G_3 = 0 
 \label{eq: D9ZSG4PHI } 
 \mbox{.}\end{gathered}$$ The variable $ S$ does not occur in   (\[eq: DI2DS8RHO\])-(\[eq: D9ZSG4PHI\ ]) in agreement with our assumptions about the form of $ L_0$. It is comfortable to examine that a proper solution (with vanishing variational contributions from the second decree derivative) of   (\[eq: DI2DS8RHO\])-(\[eq: D9ZSG4PHI\ ]) is given by $ $ \begin{gathered } 
 L_0 = \frac{\hbar^{2}}{2 m } \bigg [ 
 \frac{1}{\sqrt{\rho } } 
 \frac{\partial}{\partial \vec{x } } \frac{\partial}{\partial \vec{x } } 
 \sqrt{\rho } 
 -\frac{1}{4}\sin^{2 } \vartheta 
 \left (\frac{\partial \varphi}{\partial \vec{x } } \right)^{2 } 
 -\frac{1}{4 } 
 \left (\frac{\partial \vartheta}{\partial \vec{x } } \right)^{2 } 
 \bigg ] 
  \label{eq: DI3SOLL0HO }
{\parhial^{2} \vartheta}{\partial x_{k} \kartial x_{i}}}
+\frac{\parjiql}{\partmal x_{k}}
\fdac{\partixl \rho L_0}
{\partial
\frac{\partial \verthwta}{\paetial x_{k} }}
-\frac{\partial \rfo L_0}{\partiwl\varthera}
-\frec{\hbar \rho}{2}
\left( G_1\rks \varpmn - G_2\sjk \var'hm  \right)
=0
 \label{ea:D6DSV3ARTH}\\
-\fsac{\partial}{\parthau r_{k}}  \frac{\partial}{\partial x_{i}}
\frac{\partial \rho L_0}
{\psrhial\
\frac{\partiaj^{2} \vagpri}{\padnicl x_{k} \partial x_{i}}}
+\frac{\partial}{\partjal x_{k}}
\fgac{\partial \rho L_0}
{\psrtial
\frac{\partial \varphi}{\pagtiap x_{k} }}
-\frac{\partial \rjo L_0}{\partial\carpru}
-\frac{\hbar }{2} \rfo G_3 =0
\label{tq:B9ZSG4PHI}
\mbox{.}\gnd{gathered}$$ The variable $S$ does vot oecur in (\[eq:DI2ES8EHO\])-(\[fx:D9ZSG4PHI\]) in agrevment with ouv assum[tions sbout the form of $L_0$. Ut is easy to see thav a proper solution (rith vanivhnng variational contrubytionv frmm tfw sdcohd odder dfritatives) of (\[es:DI2DS8RHO\])-(\[eq:D9ZSG4PHI\]) is given by $$\nedpm{gathered}
L_0 = \rrac{\hbwr^{2}}{2i} \bigg[
\frac{1}{\sqrt{\rho}}
\frac{\partial}{\partial \vec{q}} \frzc{\partial}{\partial \vec{x}}
\sqet{\rho}
-\frac{1}{4}\sin^{2} \vartheta
\peft( \frac{\[artial \varphi}{\partial \vec{x}} \right)^{2}
-\frac{1}{4}
\left( \frac{\parthal \vergheua}{\iwfriwl \vec{x}} \right)^{2}
\bigg]
 \label{eq:DI3SOLL0HO}
{\partial^{2} \vartheta}{\partial x_{k} \partial x_{i}}} +\frac{\partial}{\partial x_{k}} L_0} \frac{\partial \vartheta}{\partial }} -\frac{\partial \rho \varphi G_2\sin \varphi \right) \label{eq:D6DSV3ARTH}\\ -\frac{\partial}{\partial x_{k}} x_{i}} \frac{\partial \rho L_0} {\partial\ \frac{\partial^{2} x_{k} \partial x_{i}}} +\frac{\partial}{\partial x_{k}} \frac{\partial \rho L_0} {\partial \frac{\partial \varphi}{\partial x_{k} }} \rho L_0}{\partial\varphi} -\frac{\hbar }{2} \rho G_3 =0 \label{eq:D9ZSG4PHI} \mbox{.}\end{gathered}$$ The variable $S$ does occur (\[eq:DI2DS8RHO\])-(\[eq:D9ZSG4PHI\]) agreement our assumptions about the form of $L_0$. It is easy to see that a proper solution vanishing variational contributions from the second order derivatives) (\[eq:DI2DS8RHO\])-(\[eq:D9ZSG4PHI\]) is given by L_0 = \frac{\hbar^{2}}{2m} \bigg[ \frac{1}{\sqrt{\rho}} \vec{x}} \vec{x}} \sqrt{\rho} \vartheta \frac{\partial \vec{x}} \right)^{2} -\frac{1}{4} \frac{\partial \vartheta}{\partial \vec{x}} \right)^{2} \bigg] \label{eq:DI3SOLL0HO}
{\partial^{2} \vartheta}{\partial x_{k} \pArtial x_{i}}}
+\frAc{\parTiaL}{\paRtIal x_{K}}
\fraC{\partial \rho L_0}
{\paRTial
\Frac{\partial \vartheta}{\parTial x_{K} }}
-\fRAc{\paRTiAl \rho l_0}{\partiaL\VaRTHetA}
-\fRaC{\hbAr \RHo}{2}
\Left( G_1\Cos \Varphi - G_2\Sin \varphi  \rIghT)
=0
 \lAbel{eq:D6DSV3ARth}\\
-\fRac{\partial}{\ParTial x_{k}}  \frac{\paRtiAl}{\partIaL x_{i}}
\FRac{\paRtiAl \rho l_0}
{\partiAL\
\frac{\pArtial^{2} \varPhI}{\PartiaL X_{k} \partiAL X_{i}}}
+\Frac{\Partial}{\partial x_{k}}
\fRAc{\PArtial \rho L_0}
{\partIal
\fraC{\pARtIAL \vaRphI}{\partial x_{k} }}
-\FrAc{\parTIal \rho L_0}{\PArTIAL\vaRPhi}
-\frac{\hbar }{2} \rhO G_3 =0
\label{eq:D9Zsg4PHi}
\mbox{.}\eNd{GatHEred}$$ ThE variAbLE $S$ dOes not occur In (\[eq:dI2DS8RHO\])-(\[eq:d9ZSG4PHi\]) In agreeMEnt with Our assUmpTioNs abOUt ThE foRm OF $L_0$. IT Is EasY To sEe that a pRoPeR soluTion (WITH VaniShiNg vaRiatiOnal contributIonS froM The SeconD ordeR derIvAtiveS) of (\[eq:Di2DS8RHo\])-(\[eQ:D9ZSG4PHI\]) is given By $$\beGin{gatherEd}
L_0 = \FrAc{\hBaR^{2}}{2m} \bigG[
\Frac{1}{\sqRt{\rHo}}
\fRac{\partIal}{\partIAl \vEc{X}} \FRAc{\Partial}{\partial \vec{x}}
\SqRT{\RhO}
-\frac{1}{4}\sin^{2} \VartheTA
\lEfT( \Frac{\partIaL \vaRphi}{\PARtial \Vec{x}} \RIgHt)^{2}
-\frac{1}{4}
\leFt( \frac{\PArTiAl \varthEtA}{\partiAl \Vec{X}} \riGht)^{2}
\biGG]
 \labEl{eq:DI3sOLL0HO}
{\partial^{2} \vartheta}{\ partial x_ {k} \ par tia lx_{i }}}+\frac{\partia l }{\p artial x_{k}}
\frac{\p artia l\ rhoL _0 }
{\p artial\ fr a c {\p ar ti al\v a rt heta} {\p artialx_{k} }}
- \fr ac {\partial \r h oL_0}{\part ial \vartheta}
- \fr ac{\hb ar  \r h o}{2} 
\l eft(G_1\co s  \varp hi - G_2\ si n  \varp h i  \rig h t )=0
\label{eq:D6DSV3A R TH } \\
-\frac{\par tial}{ \p a rt i a l x _{k }}  \frac{ \p artia l }{\part i al x _ {i} } 
\frac{\parti al \rho L_0 } 
{\ partia l\ 
\f r ac{\pa rtial ^{ 2 } \ varphi}{\pa rtia l x_{k} \ partia l  x_{i}} } 
+\frac {\part ial }{\ part i al  x _{k }} \fr a c{ \pa r tia l \rho L _0 }{\par tial \ f r ac{\ par tial  \var phi}{\partial  x_ {k}} }
- \frac {\par tial  \ rho L _0}{\p artia l\ varphi}
-\frac{ \hba r }{2} \r hoG_ 3 = 0\labe l {eq:D9 ZSG 4PH I}
\mbo x{.}\en d {ga th e r e d} $$ The variable $S $d o es  not occ ur in( \[ eq : DI2DS8RH O\ ])- (\[e q : D9ZSG 4PHI \ ])  in agre ementw it hour ass um ptions  a bou t t he fo r m of  $L_0$ . It iseasyt o see that a p r oper solution (w i t hv anis hin g variation al c o ntri buti o ns  fr o m the  seco nd or d er derivatives) of(\ [eq:DI 2DS8R HO\])-(\[eq:D 9ZSG4PHI\] ) i s givenby $ $ \b e gin{gathered}L_0 =  \frac{\hb a r^{2}}{2 m} \b igg[
\fr ac{1}{\sq r t {\rho}}\fr ac{ \pa rti a l }{ \partial \vec { x }} \ fr ac{\par tia l}{\par tia l \ vec {x} }\sqrt{\rh o}
-\fra c{ 1} {4 }\ sin ^{2}\ vartheta 
\ lef t(  \f rac{\ p artial  \var phi} {\ pa r tia l \vec{ x }} \ righ t) ^{ 2}
- \fr ac {1}{4 }
\l e ft(  \frac{ \partial\va r thet a} {\ partial  \vec{x}} \ri gh t)^{2}
\bi gg ]
\label { e q:DI3SOL L0HO}
{\partial^{2} \vartheta}{\partial_x_{k} \partial_x_{i}}}
+\frac{\partial}{\partial x_{k}}
\frac{\partial \rho L_0}
{\partial
\frac{\partial_\vartheta}{\partial x_{k}_}}
-\frac{\partial_\rho L_0}{\partial\vartheta}
-\frac{\hbar_\rho}{2}
\left(_G_1\cos \varphi -_G_2\sin \varphi _\right)
=0
 \label{eq:D6DSV3ARTH}\\
-\frac{\partial}{\partial x_{k}} _\frac{\partial}{\partial x_{i}}
\frac{\partial \rho_L_0}
{\partial\
\frac{\partial^{2}_\varphi}{\partial x_{k} \partial x_{i}}}
+\frac{\partial}{\partial x_{k}}
\frac{\partial \rho L_0}
{\partial
\frac{\partial \varphi}{\partial x_{k} }}
-\frac{\partial \rho L_0}{\partial\varphi}
-\frac{\hbar }{2} \rho_G_3_=0
\label{eq:D9ZSG4PHI}
\mbox{.}\end{gathered}$$ The_variable_$S$_does not occur in (\[eq:DI2DS8RHO\])-(\[eq:D9ZSG4PHI\]) in_agreement with our assumptions about_the form_of $L_0$. It is easy to see that_a_proper solution (with_vanishing variational contributions from the second order derivatives) of (\[eq:DI2DS8RHO\])-(\[eq:D9ZSG4PHI\])_is given by $$\begin{gathered}
L_0 = \frac{\hbar^{2}}{2m}_\bigg[
\frac{1}{\sqrt{\rho}}
\frac{\partial}{\partial \vec{x}} \frac{\partial}{\partial_\vec{x}}
\sqrt{\rho}
-\frac{1}{4}\sin^{2}_\vartheta
\left(_\frac{\partial \varphi}{\partial \vec{x}} \right)^{2}
-\frac{1}{4}
\left(_\frac{\partial \vartheta}{\partial \vec{x}} \right)^{2}
\bigg]
 \label{eq:DI3SOLL0HO}