 affect the probability distributions for distant measurements.) The end result of the completed teleportation process is that Bob’s ensemble is ascribed the state ${|\chi\rangle _{}}$; where this merely means that the statistics one will expect for measurements on Bob’s ensemble are now the same as those one would have expected for measurements on the initial ensemble presented to Alice.

The ensemble viewpoint presents a rather different picture, as it does involve a real process of collapse, even if only at the ensemble level. Let us suppose that Alice has performed the Bell basis measurement on her ensembles, but has not yet sent the ensemble of classical bits to Bob. The effect of this measurement will have been to leave Bob’s ensemble in a proper mixture composed of sub-ensembles in the four possible states a fixed rotation away from ${|\chi\rangle _{}}$. Thus there has been a nonlocal effect: that of preparing what was an improper mixture into a particular proper mixture, whose components depend on the parameters characterizing the unknown state. The use of the flock of classical bits that Alice sends to Bob is to allow him to separate out the ensemble he now has into four distinct sub-ensembles, on each of which he performs the relevant unitary operation, ending up with all four being described by the state ${|\chi\rangle _{}}$.

Concluding remarks {#study concluding}
==================

The aim of this paper has been to show how substantial conceptual difficulties can arise if one neglects the fact that ‘information’ is an abstract noun. This oversight seems to lie at the root of much confusion over the process of teleportation; and this gives us very good reason to pay attention to the logical status of the term. A few closing remarks should be made.

Schematically, a central part of the argument has been of the following form:

Puzzles arise when we feel the need to tell a story about how something travels from Alice to Bob in teleportation. In particular, it might be felt that this something needs to travel in a spatio-temporally continuous fashion; and one might accordingly feel pushed towards adopting something like the Jozsa/Penrose view.

But if ‘the information’ doesn’t pick out a particular, then there is no thing to take a path, continuous or not, therefore the problem is not a genuine one, but an illusion.

We can imagine a number of objections. A very simple one might take the following form: You have said that information is not a
affect the probability distributions for distant measurements .) The goal resultant role of the completed teleportation process is that Bob ’s ensemble is impute the state $ { |\chi\rangle _ { } } $; where this merely means that the statistics one will ask for measurements on Bob ’s ensemble are nowadays the same as those one would have expected for measurement on the initial ensemble presented to Alice. 

 The ensemble viewpoint presents a preferably different picture, as it does involve a real process of flop, even if only at the ensemble level. Let us presuppose that Alice has performed the Bell basis measurement on her ensembles, but has not yet send the ensemble of classical bits to Bob. The effect of this measurement will have been to leave Bob ’s corps de ballet in a proper mixture composed of sub - ensembles in the four possible states a fix rotation away from $ { |\chi\rangle _ { } } $. Thus there has been a nonlocal effect: that of preparing what was an improper mixture into a particular proper mixture, whose components depend on the parameters qualify the unknown state. The manipulation of the batch of classical bits that Alice sends to Bob is to permit him to distinguish out the ensemble he now has into four discrete sub - ensembles, on each of which he performs the relevant unitary operation, ending up with all four being described by the state $ { |\chi\rangle _ { } } $. 

 Concluding remarks { # study concluding } 
 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 

 The purpose of this paper has been to indicate how substantial conceptual difficulties can arise if one neglects the fact that ‘ information ’ is an abstract noun. This supervision seems to lie at the root of much confusion over the process of teleportation; and this gives us very good reason to pay attention to the coherent status of the term. A few shutting remarks should be make. 

 Schematically, a central part of the argument has been of the following human body: 

 Puzzles arise when we palpate the need to distinguish a story about how something travels from Alice to Bob in teleportation. In particular, it might be felt that this something needs to travel in a spatio - temporally continuous fashion; and one might accordingly feel pushed towards adopt something like the Jozsa / Penrose view. 

 But if ‘ the information ’ does n’t blame out a particular, then there is no thing to take a path, continuous or not, therefore the trouble is not a genuine one, but an illusion. 

 We can imagine a number of objections. A very simple one might take the following form: You have say that data is not a
 afvect the probability disuributions for distant mxasuremsnts.) The end result of the completed twlepoetation process is thag Bob’s endemble iw asrribed the state ${|\chi\rangle _{}}$; whsve thns merely means jhat the stadistics one winl erpect for measurements on Bob’s ensemfle are nlw the same as thoxq ons would have expected for measuremsnts on the initial rnsemble presented to Alicf.

The ensemble viewpoinh presents q raeyer differeng picture, as it does ihvolve a real process of collapre, evzn if only qt thf ensemble lxvel. Lvt us suppose that Alhce has performed the Benl vasis measurement on ier ensembles, but haf not yet sznt the ensemble of coawsican bids tu Boc. Tge erfect lf vhis measursment will yave been to leave Nof’w ensemble in a pro[ew mixture composed of sub-ensembles in tve rour possible states a dixed rotation away ftom ${|\chi\randle _{}}$. Thus there has been a nonlocal effect: that ox pre'afiny what qad an improper mixture into a particular propew moxnure, whose componcnts depend on the pwrsieters characjeriziny tge unknown state. Tje use jf thw flock os clsssical bits that Alice senes to Bob is ro allow him to se'arate out tke ensgmble ne now has into four dirtindt sub-ensemhles, on ezzh of which he pdrfprks the rtuevant unitary opqration, eiding up witf alk four being desfribed by the state ${|\chi\rwngle _{}}$.

Cmncluding gemarks {#study concluding}
==================

The aim of this paper hds teen to fhow mow substantial conceptual diyficultizs can arise if kne negnects the fwct that ‘infoslation’ is an abstrace noyn. Tyis ovefright seems to lie at tkt root of nuch confusion ovev the lrocess of tele'utration; and thix gkvef ls tery dmod reason tm pah agyentiun to the lieicak status of the term. A fsw closing remarks smould be nade.

Scheiatically, a crntral part of the argukenv has neeg of the following form:

Puzzles arise whfn re feel the geed to tell a scory about how something travels from Almce to Bob in teleportarion. In particular, nt might be fxlt thwt this smmething needs to trqvel in a spatio-ttmporally continuous faahion; dnd oje might accordingly feel pushed towards adopting something like the Jozsq/Penrose view.

But ir ‘thr infmriction’ djesn’v 'ick out a particllar, then there is no thing to teke a path, cjntinuous or not, therefore tne problem is nut a genuine one, but an jllusion.

Ee can imagine a number of objevtions. A very simple one might tqke tge followiig form: You have saic that infoemation is kot a
affect the probability distributions for distant measurements.) result the completed process is that state _{}}$; where this means that the one will expect for measurements on ensemble are now the same as those one would have expected for measurements the initial ensemble presented to Alice. The ensemble viewpoint presents a rather different as does a process of collapse, even if only at the ensemble level. Let us suppose that Alice has the Bell basis measurement on her ensembles, but not yet sent the of classical bits to Bob. effect this measurement have to Bob’s ensemble in proper mixture composed of sub-ensembles in the four possible states a fixed rotation away from ${|\chi\rangle _{}}$. there has nonlocal effect: of what an improper mixture particular proper mixture, whose components depend characterizing the unknown state. The use of the of classical that Alice sends to Bob is allow him to separate out the ensemble he has into four distinct sub-ensembles, on each of which he performs the relevant unitary operation, with all four being by the state _{}}$. remarks concluding} The aim this paper has been to show how substantial conceptual difficulties can if one neglects the fact that ‘information’ is an abstract oversight to lie at root of much confusion the of teleportation; and this very reason to logical of the term. A closing remarks should be made. a central part of the following form: Puzzles arise when we feel need to tell a story about how travels from Alice to Bob in teleportation. In particular, it might be that this to travel in a spatio-temporally continuous fashion; and might accordingly feel pushed adopting something like the Jozsa/Penrose view. But if ‘the doesn’t out a then there is thing to take path, continuous or the problem not genuine illusion. We can imagine a number objections. very simple one might take following have said that information is not a
 affect the probability distrIbutions foR distAnt MeaSuRemeNts.) THe end result of tHE comPleted teleportation proCess iS tHAt BoB’S eNsembLe is ascRIbED The StAtE ${|\chI\rANgLe _{}}$; wheRe tHis mereLy means thaT thE sTatistics one WIlL expect for MeaSurements on BOb’s EnsembLe Are NOw the SamE as thOse one WOuld haVe expecteD fOR measuREments oN THe InitIal ensemble presenTEd TO Alice.

The ensemBle vieWpOInT PResEntS a rather diFfErent PIcture, aS It DOES inVOlve a real procEss of collapSE, evEn if onLy At tHE ensemBle leVeL. let Us suppose thAt AlIce has perFormed THe Bell bASis measUremenT on Her EnseMBlEs, But HaS Not YEt SenT The Ensemble Of ClAssicAl biTS TO bob. THe eFfecT of thIs measurement WilL havE BeeN to leAve BoB’s enSeMble iN a propEr mixTuRe composed of sub-EnseMbles in thE foUr PosSiBle stATes a fiXed RotAtion awAy from ${|\cHI\raNgLE _{}}$. tHuS there has been a nonlOcAL EfFect: that Of prepARiNg WHat was an ImProPer mIXTure iNto a PArTicular pRoper mIXtUrE, whose cOmPonentS dEpeNd oN the pARameTers chAracteriZing tHE unknown state. THE use of the flocK Of CLAsSIcal BitS that Alice sEnds TO Bob Is to ALlOw hIM to seParatE oUT tHE ensemble he now has inTo Four diStincT sub-ensembles, On each of whICH He perforMs thE ReLEvant unitary opEratiOn, ending up WIth all foUr beiNg descriBed by the sTATe ${|\chi\ranGle _{}}$.

conCluDinG REmArks {#study concLUDing}
==================

thE aim of tHis Paper haS beEn tO shOw hOw SubstantiAl concepTuAl DiFfIcuLties CAn arise iF oNe nEgLecTs the FAct thaT ‘infoRmatIoN’ iS An aBstract NOuN. tHis oVeRsIght SeeMs To lie At thE RooT of much Confusion OveR The pRoCeSs of telEportation; and ThIs gives us vErY goOd reasON To pay attEntion to the logical statuS Of the teRm. A Few clOsinG remarks sHouLd be maDe.

SCHematiCally, a CentrAl ParT OF the aRGUmEnt HaS been of the FOLloWing fOrM:

PuzZles ariSe when we feel the neeD To tEll a story abouT hoW somETHiNg tRAvELs fRoM aliCE To Bob in teleportAtion. In parTiCUlAr, it might bE FelT tHat this SomethiNg neeDS to travEl in a spatIo-temporaLlY conTINuoUs fashion; aNd one migHt accordiNGly feEL pUshed TowArds adOpTinG someThing lIKe tHe JozSa/PenrOsE view.

BUt if ‘tHe InformatIon’ doesn’t pick out a particUlar, thEn theRe iS no thing tO taKE a pAth, continUous Or not, thereForE thE probLem IS not a GenuINe One, BUt an iLlusIOn.

We can imAGiNe a NUMbEr of objectiONS. a veRy simPle ONe mighT takE the following form: yOu have said that InfoRMAtiOn iS Not a
 affect the probability di stribution s for  di sta nt  mea sure ments.) The en d  res ult of the completed t elepo rt a tion pr ocess  is tha t  B o b ’sen se mbl ei sascri bed  the st ate ${|\ch i\r an gle _{}}$; w h er e this mer ely  means thatthe  stati st ics one w ill  expe ct for measur ements on  B o b’s en s emble a r e  n ow t he same as thoseo ne would have exp ectedfo r  m e a sur eme nts on the  i nitia l  ensemb l ep r e sen t ed to Alice.
The ensemb l e v iewpoi nt  pr e sentsa rat he r  di fferent pic ture , as it d oes in v olve ar eal pro cess o f c oll apse ,  e ve n i fo nly at  th e  en semble l ev el . Let  uss u p p osetha t Al ice h as performedthe  Bel l  ba sis m easur emen ton he r ense mbles ,but has not yet  sen t the ens emb le  of  c lassi c al bit s t o B ob. The  effect ofth i s me asurement will hav eb e en  to leav e Bob’ s  e ns e mble inapro perm i xture  com p os ed of su b-ense m bl es  in the  f our po ss ibl e s tates a fi xed ro tation a way f r om ${|\chi\ran g le _{}}$. Thu s  t h e re hasbee n a nonloca l ef f ect:  tha t  o f p r epari ng wh at wa s  an improper mixtur einto a  part icular proper  mixture,w h o se compo nent s  d e pend on the pa ramet ers charac t erizingthe u nknown s tate. The u se of th e f loc k o f c l a ss ical bits tha t Alic esends t o B ob is t o a llo w h imto  separate  out the  e ns em bl e h e now has into  f our  d ist incts ub-ens emble s, o nea c h o f which he p erfo rm stherel ev ant u nita r y o peratio n, ending  up with  a ll  four b eing describe dby the sta te  ${ |\chi\ r a ngle _{} }$.

Concluding remarks {#study  co nclud ing} 
======== === ====== =
T he aim  of th is pa pe r h a s  been t osho whow substa n t ial  conc ep tual  diffic ulties can arise i f  on e neglects th e f actt h at  ‘i n fo r mat io n ’ i s an abstract nou n. This ov er s ig ht seems t o  li eat theroot of  much confusi on over t he proces sof t e l epo rtation; a nd thisgives usv ery g o od  reas onto pay  a tte ntion  to th e  lo gical  statu sof the  term .A few cl osing remarks should be  made. 

Sch ema tically,a c e ntr al part o f th e argument  ha s b een o f t h e fol lowi n gfor m :

Pu zzle s  arise wh e nwef e el  the need t o t ell  a st ory abouthowsomething travels from Alice toBobi n  te lep o rtat io n. In particul ar,  i t might be  f elt that th is somet hi n g nee ds totravel  in a s p a ti o -tempo rall y c ontinuous  fa sh i on; and  o ne mightacco rd inglyfeel p u shed t owards adoptingsomet h i ng li k e t he Jo zs a/Penro s e vi ew.

But i f ‘the info rmatio n’ d oesn’ t pickou t a pa rti cu lar, thent here is n o thi ng to t ak e apat h, con tinu o u s ornot,  t her efore the p ro b le mi s n ot a  genu in e on e, but an illusion .
W e can i ma gin e a numb e ro f  objection s.A ver y simple one migh t  t a ke th e foll owingform: Y o u h av e saidtha t informati on is not a
 affect_the probability_distributions for distant measurements.)_The end_result_of the_completed_teleportation process is_that Bob’s ensemble_is ascribed the state_${|\chi\rangle _{}}$; where_this_merely means that the statistics one will expect for measurements on Bob’s ensemble are_now_the same_as_those_one would have expected for_measurements on the initial ensemble_presented to_Alice.

The ensemble viewpoint presents a rather different picture,_as_it does involve_a real process of collapse, even if only at_the ensemble level. Let us suppose_that Alice has_performed_the_Bell basis measurement on_her ensembles, but has not yet_sent the ensemble of classical bits_to Bob. The effect of this measurement_will have been to leave Bob’s_ensemble in a proper mixture_composed of_sub-ensembles in the four possible_states a fixed_rotation away_from ${|\chi\rangle _{}}$._Thus there has been a nonlocal_effect: that of_preparing what was an improper mixture_into_a particular proper_mixture,_whose_components depend_on the parameters_characterizing_the unknown_state._The use of the flock of_classical_bits that Alice sends to Bob is_to allow him to_separate_out the ensemble he_now has into four distinct_sub-ensembles, on each of which he_performs the_relevant unitary_operation, ending up with all four being described by the state_${|\chi\rangle _{}}$.

Concluding remarks {#study concluding}
==================

The aim_of this paper has_been to_show_how substantial conceptual_difficulties_can arise_if one neglects the fact that ‘information’_is an_abstract noun. This oversight seems to_lie at the root_of_much confusion over the process of_teleportation; and this gives us very_good reason to pay attention_to_the_logical status of the term._A few closing remarks should be_made.

Schematically, a central_part of the argument has been of_the_following form:

Puzzles arise when we feel_the_need to tell a story about_how_something_travels from Alice to Bob_in teleportation. In particular, it might_be felt that this something needs to travel in_a spatio-temporally continuous_fashion; and one might accordingly_feel_pushed_towards adopting something like the Jozsa/Penrose view.

But if ‘the information’_doesn’t pick_out a particular,_then there is no thing to take a path, continuous_or not, therefore the problem is not_a genuine one, but an illusion.

We can imagine a number of_objections. A very simple one might take the_following form: You have said that information_is not a