OTWY Example 2.2]).

Let ${\mathfrak{q}}= (a)$ and set $f = (a,0) \in I$. Then, $I^2 = fI$, since $I^2 = (a^2) \times (aR + \alpha R) = (a^2) \times aR=fI$. Note that $I/fA = [(a) \oplus R]/[(a) \oplus (a)] \cong R/(a)$ and $A/I = [R \oplus R]/[(a) \oplus R] \cong R/(a)$ as $R$-modules. We then have $\ell_A(A/I) =\ell_A(I/fA) = \ell_R(R/(a))$. Hence, $A/I \cong I/fA$ as an $A$-module, because $I/fA$ is a cyclic $A$-module. Thus, $I \in {\mathcal{X}}_A$ with $\mu_A(I)=2$.

Two-generated Ulrich ideals are totally reflexive $R$-modules (Proposition \[Ulrich\] (3)), possessing minimal free resolutions of a very restricted form. Let us note the following, which we need to prove Theorem \[2.3\]. We include a brief proof for the sake of completeness.

\[2.2\] Suppose that $I$ is an Ulrich ideal of $R$ and assume that $\mu_R(I)=2$. We write $I=(a, b)$ with $(a)$ a reduction of $I$. Therefore, $b^2 = ac$ for some $c \in I$. With this notation, the minimal free resolution of $I$ is given by $$\Bbb F : \ \ \cdots \to R^2 \overset{
\begin{pmatrix}
-b & -c\\
a & b
\end{pmatrix}}{\longrightarrow}
R^2 \overset{
\begin{pmatrix}
-b & -c\\
a & b
\end{pmatrix}}{\longrightarrow}R^2 \overset{\begin{pmatrix}
a & b
\end{pmatrix}}{\longrightarrow} I \to 0,$$ Hence $\pd_RI= \infty$. The ideal $I$ is so called a totally reflexive $R$-module, because $I$ is reflexive, $\Ext_
OTWY Example 2.2 ]). 

 Let $ { \mathfrak{q}}= (a)$ and set $ f = (a,0) \in I$. Then, $ I^2 = fI$, since $ I^2 = (a^2) \times (aR + \alpha R) = (a^2) \times aR = fI$. Note that $ I / fA = [ (a) \oplus R]/[(a) \oplus (a) ] \cong R/(a)$ and $ deoxyadenosine monophosphate / I = [ R \oplus R]/[(a) \oplus radius ] \cong R/(a)$ as $ R$-modules. We then have $ \ell_A(A / I) = \ell_A(I / fA) = \ell_R(R/(a))$. Hence, $ vitamin a / I \cong I / fA$ as an $ A$ -module, because $ I / fA$ is a cyclic $ A$ -module. Thus, $ I \in { \mathcal{X}}_A$ with $ \mu_A(I)=2$. 

 Two - generated Ulrich ideal are wholly reflexive $ R$-modules (Proposition \[Ulrich\ ] (3) ), possessing minimal free resolutions of a very restricted form. lease us note the following, which we necessitate to prove Theorem \[2.3\ ]. We include a brief proof for the sake of completeness. 

 \[2.2\ ] Suppose that $ I$ is an Ulrich ideal of $ R$ and bear that $ \mu_R(I)=2$. We write $ I=(a, b)$ with $ (a)$ a reduction of $ I$. Therefore, $ b^2 = ac$ for some $ deoxycytidine monophosphate \in I$. With this notation, the minimal free resolution of $ I$ is given by $ $ \Bbb degree fahrenheit: \ \ \cdots \to R^2 \overset { 
 \begin{pmatrix } 
 -b & -c\\ 
 a & b 
 \end{pmatrix}}{\longrightarrow } 
 R^2 \overset { 
 \begin{pmatrix } 
 -b & -c\\ 
 a & b 
 \end{pmatrix}}{\longrightarrow}R^2 \overset{\begin{pmatrix } 
 a & b 
 \end{pmatrix}}{\longrightarrow } I \to 0,$$ Hence $ \pd_RI= \infty$. The ideal $ I$ is so predict a totally reflexive $ R$-module, because $ I$ is reflexive, $ \Ext _
OTWJ Example 2.2]).

Let ${\mathfrak{q}}= (x)$ and set $f = (a,0) \nb I$. Thxn, $I^2 = fJ$, since $K^2 = (a^2) \times (aR + \alpha R) = (a^2) \tilew aR=fU$. Note that $I/fA = [(a) \opljs R]/[(a) \oplls (a)] \cong R/(a)$ end $A/I = [R \oplus C]/[(z) \oplus R] \conf R/(a)$ cs $R$-modules. We tmen have $\eln_A(A/I) =\ell_A(I/fA) = \alu_R(X/(a))$. Hence, $A/I \cong I/fA$ as an $A$-module, bqcause $O/fW$ is a cyclic $W$-modllq. Thhs, $I \in {\mathcal{X}}_A$ with $\mu_A(I)=2$.

Two-genedated Unrich ideals sre totally reflexive $R$-modkles (Proposition \[Ulricj\] (3)), possessibg mybimal free rdsolutions of a very rgstricted form. Let us note the fullownng, which wg hefg to prove Vheorei \[2.3\]. We includc a briaf proog for the sake of conpleteness.

\[2.2\] Suppose thet $I$ is an Ulrich idgal of $R$ atd assume that $\mu_R(I)=2$. Ww wrije $I=(a, b)$ wkrh $(x)$ a rxdudtion lf $M$. Therefore, $b^2 = ac$ for wome $c \in I$. With thos botation, the jinimaj sree resolution of $I$ is given by $$\Bbb F : \ \ \ddots \to R^2 \overset{
\begin{pmatrix}
-b & -c\\
a & b
\end{pmajrix}}{\longridhtarrow}
R^2 \overset{
\begin{pmatrix}
-b & -c\\
a & b
\end{pmatrix}}{\lotgrigitxrriw}V^2 \ovdesft{\begin{pmatrix}
a & b
\end{pmatrix}}{\longrightarrow} I \ek 0,$$ Hvnce $\pd_RI= \infty$. Tme ideal $I$ is so cslpec a totally rewlexivz $R$-jodule, because $I$ id reflevive, $\Wxt_
OTWY Example 2.2]). Let ${\mathfrak{q}}= (a)$ and = \in I$. $I^2 = fI$, (aR \alpha R) = \times aR=fI$. Note $I/fA = [(a) \oplus R]/[(a) \oplus \cong R/(a)$ and $A/I = [R \oplus R]/[(a) \oplus R] \cong R/(a)$ as We then have $\ell_A(A/I) =\ell_A(I/fA) = \ell_R(R/(a))$. Hence, $A/I \cong I/fA$ as an because is cyclic Thus, $I \in {\mathcal{X}}_A$ with $\mu_A(I)=2$. Two-generated Ulrich ideals are totally reflexive $R$-modules (Proposition \[Ulrich\] (3)), minimal free resolutions of a very restricted form. us note the following, we need to prove Theorem We a brief for sake completeness. \[2.2\] Suppose $I$ is an Ulrich ideal of $R$ and assume that $\mu_R(I)=2$. We write $I=(a, b)$ with $(a)$ reduction of $b^2 = for $c I$. With this minimal free resolution of $I$ is F : \ \ \cdots \to R^2 \overset{ -b & a & b \end{pmatrix}}{\longrightarrow} R^2 \overset{ -b & -c\\ a & b \end{pmatrix}}{\longrightarrow}R^2 \overset{\begin{pmatrix} & b \end{pmatrix}}{\longrightarrow} I \to 0,$$ Hence $\pd_RI= \infty$. The ideal $I$ is so called reflexive $R$-module, because $I$ reflexive, $\Ext_
OTWY Example 2.2]).

Let ${\mathfrak{q}}= (a)$ aNd set $f = (a,0) \in I$. then, $I^2 = FI$, sIncE $I^2 = (A^2) \timEs (aR + \Alpha R) = (a^2) \times aR=Fi$. NotE that $I/fA = [(a) \oplus R]/[(a) \oplus (a)] \Cong R/(A)$ aND $A/I = [R \OPlUs R]/[(a) \oPlus R] \coNG R/(A)$ AS $R$-mOdUlEs. WE tHEn Have $\eLl_A(a/I) =\ell_A(I/FA) = \ell_R(R/(a))$. HeNce, $a/I \Cong I/fA$ as an $A$-MOdUle, because $i/fA$ Is a cyclic $A$-moDulE. Thus, $I \In {\MatHCal{X}}_A$ WitH $\mu_A(I)=2$.

two-genERated ULrich ideaLs ARe totaLLy refleXIVe $r$-modUles (Proposition \[UlRIcH\] (3)), Possessing miniMal freE rESoLUTioNs oF a very restRiCted fORm. Let us NOtE THE foLLowing, which we Need to prove tHeoRem \[2.3\]. We iNcLudE A brief Proof FoR The Sake of complEtenEss.

\[2.2\] SupposE that $I$ IS an UlriCH ideal oF $R$ and aSsuMe tHat $\mU_r(I)=2$. we WriTe $i=(A, b)$ wITh $(A)$ a rEDucTion of $I$. THeReFore, $b^2 = Ac$ foR SOME $c \in i$. WiTh thIs notAtion, the minimAl fRee rESolUtion Of $I$ is GiveN bY $$\Bbb F : \ \ \Cdots \tO R^2 \oveRsEt{
\begin{pmatrix}
-b & -C\\
a & b
\eNd{pmatrix}}{\LonGrIghTaRrow}
R^2 \OVerset{
\BegIn{pMatrix}
-b & -C\\
a & b
\end{pMAtrIx}}{\LONGrIghtarrow}R^2 \overset{\bEgIN{PmAtrix}
a & b
\eNd{pmatRIx}}{\LoNGrightarRoW} I \tO 0,$$ HenCE $\Pd_RI= \iNfty$. tHe Ideal $I$ is So callED a ToTally reFlExive $R$-MoDulE, beCause $i$ Is reFlexivE, $\Ext_
OTWY Example 2.2]).

Let $ {\mathfrak {q}}=  (a )$an d se t $f  = (a,0) \in I $ . Th en, $I^2 = fI$, since$I^2=( a^2) \t imes(aR + \ a lp h a  R)  =  ( a^2 )\ ti mes a R=f I$. Not e that $I/ fA=[(a) \oplusR ]/ [(a) \oplu s ( a)] \cong R/ (a) $ and$A /I=  [R \ opl us R] /[(a)\ oplusR] \congR/ ( a)$ as $R$-mod u l es . We  then have $\ell_ A (A / I) =\ell_A(I/f A) = \ el l _R ( R /(a ))$ . Hence, $ A/ I \co n g I/fA$ as a n  $A $ -module, beca use $I/fA$i s a  cycli c$A$ - module . Thu s, $I\in {\mathc al{X }}_A$ wit h $\mu _ A(I)=2$ . 

Two-g enerat edUlr ichi de al s a re tot a ll y r e fle xive $R$ -m od ules(Pro p o s i tion  \[ Ulri ch\](3)), possess ing  min i mal  free  reso luti on s ofa very  rest ri cted form. Letus n ote the f oll ow ing ,which we nee d t o p rove Th eorem \ [ 2.3 \] . W einclude a brief pr oo f fo r the sa ke ofc om pl e teness.
\ [2. 2\]S u ppose  tha t  $ I$ is an  Ulric h  i de al of $ R$  and a ss ume  th at $\ m u_R( I)=2$.  We writ e $I= ( a, b)$ with $( a )$ a reductio n  o f $I $ . Th ere fore, $b^2= ac $  for  som e  $ c \ i n I$.  With  t h is notation, the minim al  freeresol ution of $I$is given b y $ $\Bbb F: \\  \ c dots \to R^2 \ overs et{
\begin { pmatrix} 
-b &  -c\\
a& b
\end{ p m atrix}}{ \lo ngr igh tar r o w} 
R^2 \overset { \beg in {pmatri x}-b & -c \\a &  b\en d{ pmatrix}} {\longri gh ta rr ow }R^ 2 \ov e rset{\be gi n{p ma tri x}
a&  b
\en d{pma trix }} {\ l ong rightar r ow } I \t o0, $$ H enc e$\pd_ RI=\ inf ty$. Th e ideal $ I$i s so  c al led a t otally reflex iv e $R$-modu le , b ecause $ I$ is re flexive, $\Ext_
OTWY Example_2.2]).

Let ${\mathfrak{q}}=_(a)$ and set $f_= (a,0)_\in_I$. Then,_$I^2_= fI$, since_$I^2 = (a^2)_\times (aR + \alpha_R) = (a^2)_\times_aR=fI$. Note that $I/fA = [(a) \oplus R]/[(a) \oplus (a)] \cong R/(a)$ and $A/I_=_[R \oplus_R]/[(a)_\oplus_R] \cong R/(a)$ as $R$-modules._We then have $\ell_A(A/I) =\ell_A(I/fA)_= \ell_R(R/(a))$._Hence, $A/I \cong I/fA$ as an $A$-module, because_$I/fA$_is a cyclic_$A$-module. Thus, $I \in {\mathcal{X}}_A$ with $\mu_A(I)=2$.

Two-generated Ulrich ideals_are totally reflexive $R$-modules (Proposition \[Ulrich\]_(3)), possessing minimal_free_resolutions_of a very restricted_form. Let us note the following,_which we need to prove Theorem_\[2.3\]. We include a brief proof for_the sake of completeness.

\[2.2\] Suppose that_$I$ is an Ulrich ideal_of $R$_and assume that $\mu_R(I)=2$. We_write $I=(a, b)$_with $(a)$_a reduction of_$I$. Therefore, $b^2 = ac$ for_some $c \in_I$. With this notation, the minimal_free_resolution of $I$_is_given_by $$\Bbb_F : \_\_\cdots \to_R^2_\overset{
\begin{pmatrix}
-b & -c\\
a & b
\end{pmatrix}}{\longrightarrow}
R^2 \overset{
\begin{pmatrix}
-b_&_-c\\
a & b
\end{pmatrix}}{\longrightarrow}R^2 \overset{\begin{pmatrix}
a & b
\end{pmatrix}}{\longrightarrow} I_\to 0,$$ Hence $\pd_RI=_\infty$._The ideal $I$ is_so called a totally reflexive_$R$-module, because $I$ is reflexive, $\Ext_