 $(\pi,0)$ (i.e. in the second zone) are such, that one is ‘looking into the node’ of the radiation characteristics of the ZRS, whereas for smaller $\bbox{k}_{\|}$ one is looking at the maximum (see the inset). Hence there is a strong asymmetry around $(\pi,0)$. Increasing the energy to $\ge 30 eV$ the angles $\Theta$ becomes smaller, one is no longer sampling the node and the the intensity is much more symmetric around $(\pi,0)$.\
As shown in the preceding discussion, our theory reproduced, despite its simplicity, some experimental features seen in the cuprates. We therefore proceed to address potential applications in experiment. Thereby the main goal is to find experimental conditions under which the ZRS-derived state at a given momentum ${\bf k}_{\|}$ can be observed with the highest intensity. To that end, we can vary different experimental parameters, mainly the direction of the photon polarization and the Brillouin zone in which we are measuring.\
We first consider the case of normal incidence of the light, that means the electric field vector $\bbox{\epsilon}$ is in the CuO$_2$ plane. Rotating $\bbox{\epsilon}$ in the plane will change the intensity from the ZRS-derived states in a systematic way, and for some angle $\Phi_E$ it will be maximum. Along high symmetry directions like $(1,1)$ or $(1,0)$ the optimal polarization can be deduced by symmetry considerations, because the ZRS has a definite parity under reflections by these directions. For momenta $\bbox{k}$ along $(1,1)$ $\bbox{\epsilon}$ has to be perpendicular to $\bbox{k}$, whereas along $(1,0)$ it must be parallel[@ShenDessau]. For nonsymmetric momenta, however, this symmetry analysis is not possible and one has to calculate the optimum direction. We note that apart from merely enhancing the intensity of the ZRS, knowledge of the polarization dependence of the ARPES intensity of the ‘ideal’ ZRS would allow also to separate the original signal from ZRS-derived states from any ‘background’, that means photoelectrons which have undergone inelastic scattering on their way to the analyzer. Since it is plausible that these background electrons have more or less lost the information about the polarization of the incoming light, their contribution should be insensitive to polarization. Taking the spectrum at the ‘optimal angle’ for the ZRS and perpendicular to
$ (\pi,0)$ (i.e. in the second zone) are such, that one is ‘ looking into the node ’ of the radiation characteristics of the ZRS, whereas for little $ \bbox{k}_{\|}$ one is expect at the maximum (visualize the gusset). Hence there is a solid asymmetry around $ (\pi,0)$. increase the energy to $ \ge 30 eV$ the angle $ \Theta$ becomes smaller, one is no longer sample the node and the the intensity is much more symmetric around $ (\pi,0)$.\ 
 As indicate in the preceding discussion, our theory reproduced, despite its simplicity, some experimental features attend in the cuprates. We therefore proceed to cover potential applications in experiment. Thereby the chief goal is to detect experimental conditions under which the ZRS - derived state at a given momentum $ { \bf k}_{\|}$ can be observed with the high intensity. To that end, we can vary different experimental parameters, mainly the direction of the photon polarization and the Brillouin zone in which we are measuring.\ 
 We first consider the case of normal incidence of the light, that means the electric field vector $ \bbox{\epsilon}$ is in the CuO$_2 $ plane. Rotating $ \bbox{\epsilon}$ in the plane will change the volume from the ZRS - derived states in a taxonomic direction, and for some slant $ \Phi_E$ it will be maximum. Along high symmetry directions like $ (1,1)$ or $ (1,0)$ the optimal polarization can be deduced by symmetry considerations, because the ZRS get a definite parity under reflections by these directions. For momenta $ \bbox{k}$ along $ (1,1)$ $ \bbox{\epsilon}$ accept to be perpendicular to $ \bbox{k}$, whereas along $ (1,0)$ it must be parallel[@ShenDessau ]. For nonsymmetric momenta, however, this symmetry analysis is not potential and one has to account the optimum direction. We note that apart from merely enhancing the intensity of the ZRS, cognition of the polarization dependence of the ARPES intensity of the ‘ ideal ’ ZRS would allow also to separate the original signal from ZRS - derived states from any ‘ background ’, that means photoelectron which have undergone inelastic scattering on their way to the analyzer. Since it is plausible that these background electrons have more or less fall back the information about the polarization of the incoming luminosity, their contribution should be insensitive to polarization. Taking the spectrum at the ‘ optimum angle ’ for the ZRS and perpendicular to
 $(\pi,0)$ (i.e. in the second zone) ave such, that one is ‘looning ihto the vode’ of the radiation characveriwtics of the ZRS, whereas fof smaller $\bbox{k}_{\|}$ obe iw looking av the mawnmum (ace thz mnset). Hence thete is a strotg asymmetry asojnb $(\pi,0)$. Increasing the energy to $\ge 30 eV$ the anblfs $\Theta$ becomgs smsjler, one is no longer sampling the nods and tie the intensitu is much more symmetric agounf $(\pi,0)$.\
As shown in thf preceding dissyssion, our tfeory reproduced, despije its simplicity, some experimengal fzatures seeb un hve cuprates. We trerefore progved to dddress potential appkicetiobs in experiment. Therxby the main goal is to find ax'erimental conditions ubder fhicv thd ZRR-dedited state at a given mkmentum ${\bf j}_{\|}$ can be observed wotr the highest jntensytr. To that end, we can vary different exptrimehtal parameters, mainly rhe direction of the khoton polwrization and the Brillouin zone in which we are keasucivg.\
Wt nlrst xojsider the case of normal incidence of the lidgt, tmat means the elcctric field vectot $\hbpv{\epsilon}$ is iv the EhO$_2$ plane. Rotating $\bblx{\epsiljn}$ in the plant wilk change the intensity from the ZRS-derined wtates in a systemctic way, and for some angle $\Phi_E$ it will be oaxijum. Along hlgh symmeffy directions liye $(1,1)$ os $(1,0)$ the okgimal polarizatiog can be veduczd by syometty consyderations, becamve the ZRS has a dffinije parhty under geflections by these directions. For momenta $\bnof{k}$ dlong $(1,1)$ $\byox{\epsllon}$ has to be [erpendicular jo $\bbox{k}$, cherear along $(1,0)$ in must be parallel[@ShqnDessau]. For tlnsymmetric komenta, rowecer, rhis syooetry analysis is not possible ane one has to calcukatg fhe optimum dirzetuon. We note thay aoare vrpm kerely enhanwing thd intevsity of thc ZFS, kmowledge of the polasizafion dependence of tme ARPES untensitr of the ‘ideak’ ZRS would allow wlso vo seperate yhe original signal from ZRS-derivsd states frjm any ‘backgwoune’, that means photoelectrons which have undergone inxlastic scattering on jheir way to the analizev. Since it ix platsible thdt these background wlectrons have move or less lost the inrormathon ahout the polarization of the incoming light, their contribution should be unsensmtyve to poladizayion. Naknng the s[ectcuo at the ‘optimal angle’ for the ZRS and perpendirular to
$(\pi,0)$ (i.e. in the second zone) are one ‘looking into node’ of the whereas smaller $\bbox{k}_{\|}$ one looking at the (see the inset). Hence there is strong asymmetry around $(\pi,0)$. Increasing the energy to $\ge 30 eV$ the angles becomes smaller, one is no longer sampling the node and the the intensity much symmetric $(\pi,0)$.\ shown in the preceding discussion, our theory reproduced, despite its simplicity, some experimental features seen in cuprates. We therefore proceed to address potential applications experiment. Thereby the main is to find experimental conditions which ZRS-derived state a momentum k}_{\|}$ can be with the highest intensity. To that end, we can vary different experimental parameters, mainly the direction of photon polarization Brillouin zone which are We first consider of normal incidence of the light, electric field vector $\bbox{\epsilon}$ is in the CuO$_2$ Rotating $\bbox{\epsilon}$ the plane will change the intensity the ZRS-derived states in a systematic way, and some angle $\Phi_E$ it will be maximum. Along high symmetry directions like $(1,1)$ or $(1,0)$ polarization can be deduced symmetry considerations, because ZRS a parity reflections by directions. For momenta $\bbox{k}$ along $(1,1)$ $\bbox{\epsilon}$ has to be perpendicular $\bbox{k}$, whereas along $(1,0)$ it must be parallel[@ShenDessau]. For nonsymmetric this analysis is not and one has to the direction. We note that merely the ZRS, of polarization dependence of the intensity of the ‘ideal’ ZRS allow also to separate states from any ‘background’, that means photoelectrons which undergone inelastic scattering on their way to analyzer. Since it is plausible that these background electrons have more or lost the the polarization of the incoming light, their contribution be insensitive to polarization. the spectrum at the ‘optimal angle’ for the ZRS perpendicular
 $(\pi,0)$ (i.e. in the second zone) are sucH, that one is ‘LookiNg iNto ThE nodE’ of tHe radiation chaRActeRistics of the ZRS, whereas For smAlLEr $\bbOX{k}_{\|}$ One is Looking AT tHE MaxImUm (See ThE InSet). HeNce There is A strong asyMmeTrY around $(\pi,0)$. IncREaSing the eneRgy To $\ge 30 eV$ the angLes $\theta$ bEcOmeS SmallEr, oNe is nO longeR SampliNg the node AnD The the INtensitY IS mUch mOre symmetric arounD $(\Pi,0)$.\
aS shown in the preCeding DiSCuSSIon, Our Theory reprOdUced, dESpite itS SiMPLIciTY, some experimeNtal featureS SeeN in the CuPraTEs. We thErefoRe PRocEed to addresS potEntial appLicatiONs in expERiment. THereby The MaiN goaL Is To FinD eXPerIMeNtaL ConDitions uNdEr Which The Zrs-DERiveD stAte aT a givEn momentum ${\bf k}_{\|}$ Can Be obSErvEd witH the hIgheSt IntenSity. To That eNd, We can vary differEnt eXperimentAl pArAmeTeRs, maiNLy the dIreCtiOn of the Photon pOLarIzATIOn And the Brillouin zonE iN WHiCh we are mEasuriNG.\
WE fIRst consiDeR thE casE OF normAl inCIdEnce of thE light, THaT mEans the ElEctric FiEld VecTor $\bbOX{\epsIlon}$ is In the CuO$_2$ Plane. rOtating $\bbox{\epsILon}$ in the plane WIlL CHaNGe thE inTensity from The Zrs-derIved STaTes IN a sysTematIc WAy, ANd for some angle $\Phi_E$ iT wIll be mAximuM. Along high symMetry direcTIONs like $(1,1)$ or $(1,0)$ The oPTiMAl polarization Can be Deduced by sYMmetry coNsideRations, bEcause the zrs has a defIniTe pAriTy uNDEr Reflections by THEse dIrEctions. for Momenta $\BboX{k}$ aLonG $(1,1)$ $\bbOx{\Epsilon}$ haS to be perPeNdIcUlAr tO $\bbox{K}$, Whereas aLoNg $(1,0)$ iT mUst Be parALlel[@ShEnDesSau]. FOr NoNSymMetric mOMeNTA, howEvEr, This SymMeTry anAlysIS is Not possIble and onE haS To caLcUlAte the oPtimum directiOn. we note that ApArt From meRELy enhancIng the intensity of the ZRS, KNowledgE of The poLariZation depEndEnce of The arPES inTensitY of thE ‘iDeaL’ zrS wouLD AlLow AlSo to separaTE The OrigiNaL sigNal from zRS-derived states frOM anY ‘background’, thAt mEans PHOtOelECtROns WhICh hAVE undergone inelaStic scatteRiNG oN their way tO The AnAlyzer. SInce it iS plauSIble thaT these bacKground elEcTronS HAve More or less Lost the iNformatioN About THe PolarIzaTion of ThE inCominG light, THeiR contRibutiOn Should Be insEnSitive to Polarization. Taking the spEctrum At the ‘OptImal angle’ For THe ZrS and perpEndiCular to
 $(\pi,0)$ (i.e. in the se cond zone)  aresuc h,th at o ne i s ‘looking int o  the  node’ of the radiatio n cha ra c teri s ti cs of  the ZR S ,w h ere as  f orsm a ll er $\ bbo x{k}_{\ |}$ one is  lo ok ing at the m a xi mum (see t heinset). Henc e t here i sa s t rongasy mmetr y arou n d $(\p i,0)$. In cr e asingt he ener g y  t o $\ ge 30 eV$ the ang l es $\Theta$ becom es sma ll e r, o neisno longersa mplin g  the no d ea n d  th e  the intensit y is much m o resymmet ri c a r ound $ (\pi, 0) $ .\As shown in  the  precedin g disc u ssion,o ur theo ry rep rod uce d, d e sp it e i ts sim p li cit y , s ome expe ri me ntalfeat u r e s  see n i n th e cup rates. We the ref orep roc eed t o add ress  p otent ial ap plica ti ons in experime nt.Thereby t hema ingo al is to fin d e xpe rimenta l condi t ion su n d er  which the ZRS-der iv e d  s tate ata give n  m om e ntum ${\ bf  k} _{\| } $  canbe o b se rved wit h theh ig he st inte ns ity. T otha t e nd, w e  can  varydifferen t exp e rimental param e ters, mainlyt he d ir e ctio n o f the photo n po l ariz atio n  a ndt he Br illou in zo n e in which we are m ea suring .\
We  first consid er the cas e o f normal  inc i de n ce of the ligh t, th at means t h e electr ic fi eld vect or $\bbox { \ epsilon} $ i s i n t heC u O$ _2$ plane. Ro t a ting  $ \bbox{\ eps ilon}$inthe  pl ane  w ill chang e the in te ns it yfro m the ZRS-deri ve d s ta tes  in a system aticway,  a nd for  some a n gl e $\Ph i_ E$  itwil lbe ma ximu m . A long hi gh symmet ryd irec ti on s like$(1,1)$ or $( 1, 0)$ the op ti mal  polar i z ation ca n be deduced by symmetr y  consid era tions , be cause the  ZR S hasa d e finite  parit y und er  re f l ectio n s  b y t he se directi o n s.For m om enta  $\bbox {k}$ along $(1,1)$ $\b box{\epsilon} $ h as t o be  pe r pe n dic ul a r t o $\bbox{k}$, whe reas along  $ ( 1, 0)$ it mus t  be  p arallel [@ShenD essau ] . For n onsymmetr ic moment a,  how e v er,  this symm etry ana lysis isn ot po s si ble a ndone ha stocalcu late t h e o ptimu m dire ct ion. W e not ethat apa rt from merely enhancin g theinten sit y of theZRS ,  kn owledge o f th e polariza tio n d epend enc e  of t he A R PE S i n tensi ty o f  the ‘ide a l’  ZR S wo uld allow a l s o  to  sepa rat e  the o rigi nal signal from Z R S-derived stat es f r o m a ny‘ back gr ound’, that me ans  p h o toelectr on s which hav e underg on e  inel asticscatte ring on t he i r wayto t heanalyzer.  Si nc e  it ispl au s ible t hatth ese ba ckgrou n d el e c trons have moreor le s s  lost the  info rm ation a b outthe polari zation of t he inc omin g lig ht, the ir  contr ibu ti on shouldb e insensi tiveto pola ri zati on.  Takin g th e spect rumat  th e ‘optima l an g le ’f ortheZRS a nd  per pendicula r  to
 $(\pi,0)$_(i.e. in_the second zone) are_such, that_one_is ‘looking_into_the node’ of_the radiation characteristics_of the ZRS, whereas_for smaller $\bbox{k}_{\|}$_one_is looking at the maximum (see the inset). Hence there is a strong asymmetry_around_$(\pi,0)$. Increasing_the_energy_to $\ge 30 eV$ the_angles $\Theta$ becomes smaller, one_is no_longer sampling the node and the the intensity_is_much more symmetric_around $(\pi,0)$.\
As shown in the preceding discussion, our theory_reproduced, despite its simplicity, some experimental_features seen in_the_cuprates._We therefore proceed to_address potential applications in experiment. Thereby_the main goal is to find_experimental conditions under which the ZRS-derived state_at a given momentum ${\bf k}_{\|}$_can be observed with the_highest intensity._To that end, we can_vary different experimental_parameters, mainly_the direction of_the photon polarization and the Brillouin_zone in which_we are measuring.\
We first consider the_case_of normal incidence_of_the_light, that_means the electric_field_vector $\bbox{\epsilon}$_is_in the CuO$_2$ plane. Rotating $\bbox{\epsilon}$_in_the plane will change the intensity from_the ZRS-derived states in_a_systematic way, and for_some angle $\Phi_E$ it will_be maximum. Along high symmetry directions_like $(1,1)$_or $(1,0)$_the optimal polarization can be deduced by symmetry considerations, because the_ZRS has a definite parity under_reflections by these directions._For momenta_$\bbox{k}$_along $(1,1)$ $\bbox{\epsilon}$_has_to be_perpendicular to $\bbox{k}$, whereas along $(1,0)$ it_must be_parallel[@ShenDessau]. For nonsymmetric momenta, however, this_symmetry analysis is not_possible_and one has to calculate the_optimum direction. We note that apart_from merely enhancing the intensity_of_the_ZRS, knowledge of the polarization_dependence of the ARPES intensity of_the ‘ideal’ ZRS_would allow also to separate the original_signal_from ZRS-derived states from any ‘background’,_that_means photoelectrons which have undergone inelastic_scattering_on_their way to the analyzer._Since it is plausible that these_background electrons have more or less lost the information_about the polarization_of the incoming light, their_contribution_should_be insensitive to polarization. Taking the spectrum at the ‘optimal_angle’ for_the ZRS and_perpendicular to