 [@2008PhRvD..78h3012E; @2008PhRvD..78l3529Z], nevertheless the dipole could be larger in the case of more exotic models. In addition to the dipole, a moving observer will also see velocity imprints at $\ell>1$ in the CMB due to Doppler and aberration effects [@Challinor:2002zh; @Burles:2006xf]. Such effects can be measured as correlations among different $\ell$s, as has been proposed in Refs. [@Kosowsky:2010jm; @Amendola:2010ty; @Notari:2011sb] and subsequently demonstrated in Ref. .

The aberration effect changes the arrival direction of photons from $\hat{n}^{\prime}$ to $\hat{n}$, which, at linear order in $\beta$, is completely degenerate with a lensing dipole. The Doppler effect modulates the CMB (an effect that is partly degenerate with an intrinsic CMB dipole[^7]) changing the specific intensity $I'$ in the CMB rest frame to the intensity $I$ in the observer’s frame[^8] by a multiplicative, direction-dependent factor as [@1986rpa..book.....R; @Challinor:2002zh] $$\begin{aligned}
    I'(\nu',\,\hat{n}^{\prime})=I(\nu,\,\hat{n}) \left(\frac{\nu'}{\nu} \right)^3,
    \label{eq:i_boost}\end{aligned}$$ where $$\begin{aligned}
    \nu \,=\, \nu^{\prime}\,\gamma\,\big(1+ \vec{\beta}\cdot\hat{n}^{\prime}\big)\,,\qquad
    \hat{n} \,=\,  \frac{\hat{n}^{\prime} +  \left[\gamma\,\beta + (\gamma - 1) \big(\hat{n}^{\prime}\cdot\hat{\beta} \big)\right]\hat{\beta}}{\gamma (1+ \vec{\beta} \cdot\hat{n}^{\prime}) } \,,
    \label{eq:nu_boost}\end{aligned}$$ with $\gamma \equiv (1-\vec{\beta}^2)^{-1/2}$. The temperature and polarization fields $X(\hat{n})$ in the CMB rest frame (where $X$ stands for $T,\,E$ or $B$) are similarly transformed as $$\begin{aligned
[ @2008PhRvD.. 78h3012E; @2008PhRvD.. 78l3529Z ], nevertheless the dipole could be larger in the case of more exotic model. In accession to the dipole, a moving observer will also witness velocity imprints at $ \ell>1 $ in the CMB due to Doppler and aberrance effects   [ @Challinor:2002zh; @Burles:2006xf ]. Such effects can be measured as correlation among different $ \ell$s, as has been proposed in Refs.   [ @Kosowsky:2010jm; @Amendola:2010ty; @Notari:2011sb ] and subsequently demonstrate in Ref.  . 

 The aberration effect change the arrival direction of photons from $ \hat{n}^{\prime}$ to $ \hat{n}$, which, at linear order in $ \beta$, is completely degenerate with a lensing dipole. The Doppler consequence modulates the CMB (an effect that is partly debauched with an intrinsic CMB dipole[^7 ]) changing the specific intensity $ I'$ in the CMB remainder frame to the volume $ I$ in the observer ’s frame[^8 ] by a multiplicative, direction - dependent factor as   [ @1986rpa.. book..... radius; @Challinor:2002zh ] $ $ \begin{aligned } 
     I'(\nu',\,\hat{n}^{\prime})=I(\nu,\,\hat{n }) \left(\frac{\nu'}{\nu } \right)^3, 
     \label{eq: i_boost}\end{aligned}$$ where $ $ \begin{aligned } 
     \nu \,=\, \nu^{\prime}\,\gamma\,\big(1 + \vec{\beta}\cdot\hat{n}^{\prime}\big)\,,\qquad 
     \hat{n } \,=\,   \frac{\hat{n}^{\prime } +   \left[\gamma\,\beta + (\gamma - 1) \big(\hat{n}^{\prime}\cdot\hat{\beta } \big)\right]\hat{\beta}}{\gamma (1 + \vec{\beta } \cdot\hat{n}^{\prime }) } \, , 
     \label{eq: nu_boost}\end{aligned}$$ with $ \gamma \equiv (1-\vec{\beta}^2)^{-1/2}$. The temperature and polarization fields $ X(\hat{n})$ in the CMB rest frame (where $ X$ stands for $ T,\,E$ or $ B$) are similarly transformed as $ $ \begin{aligned
 [@2008PhGvD..78h3012E; @2008PhRvD..78l3529Z], neverthelers the dipole could be larged in the case of more exotic models. Mn aeditiin to the dipole, a movkng obserner will qlso wee velocivg imprikcs at $\cll>1$ iu vhe CMB due to Coppler ang aberration exfdccs [@Challinor:2002zh; @Burles:2006xf]. Such effects san be kewsured as corrglatipgs ajong different $\ell$s, as has been prkposed pn Refs. [@Kosowsky:2010jm; @Amendola:2010ty; @Notari:2011sb] and skbseeuently demonstratfd in Ref. .

Thg abqeration effezt changes the arrival direction of photons from $\hat{n}^{\orime}$ to $\hat{n}$, wyixh, wj linear ordxr in $\feta$, is completely dageneraye with a lenslng dmpolw. The Doppler effect kodulates the CMB (wn effect tkat is partly degenerqtw witv an intfunskc DMU djpole[^7]) fhaiging the slecific intwnsity $I'$ in the CMB rqwt frame to tge intqnfity $I$ in the observer’s frame[^8] by a multpplidative, direction-dependebt factor as [@1986rpa..book.....R; @Fhallinor:2002sh] $$\begin{aligned}
    I'(\nu',\,\hat{n}^{\prime})=I(\nu,\,\hat{n}) \left(\frac{\nu'}{\tu} \rijhg)^3,
    \jxvep{eq:i_boost}\end{aligned}$$ where $$\begin{aligned}
    \nu \,=\, \hu^{\krike}\,\gamma\,\big(1+ \vec{\neta}\cdot\hat{n}^{\prime}\bog)\,,\eqiwd
    \hat{n} \,=\,  \wrac{\hac{h}^{\pdime} +  \left[\gamma\,\beha + (\gamia - 1) \vig(\hat{n}^{\pryme}\ccot\hat{\beta} \big)\right]\hat{\beta}}{\gqmma (1+ \vec{\betc} \ceot\hat{n}^{\prime}) } \,,
    \pabel{eq:nu_boust}\emd{alibned}$$ with $\gamma \equiv (1-\vzc{\beta}^2)^{-1/2}$. The temperwture and oolarization fieuds $X(\vat{n})$ in ufe CMB rest frame (where $X$ wtanbs for $T,\,D$ or $B$) are similarly transformed as $$\begin{alihned
[@2008PhRvD..78h3012E; @2008PhRvD..78l3529Z], nevertheless the dipole could be the of more models. In addition observer also see velocity at $\ell>1$ in CMB due to Doppler and aberration [@Challinor:2002zh; @Burles:2006xf]. Such effects can be measured as correlations among different $\ell$s, as been proposed in Refs. [@Kosowsky:2010jm; @Amendola:2010ty; @Notari:2011sb] and subsequently demonstrated in Ref. . aberration changes arrival of photons from $\hat{n}^{\prime}$ to $\hat{n}$, which, at linear order in $\beta$, is completely degenerate with lensing dipole. The Doppler effect modulates the CMB effect that is partly with an intrinsic CMB dipole[^7]) the intensity $I'$ the rest to the intensity in the observer’s frame[^8] by a multiplicative, direction-dependent factor as [@1986rpa..book.....R; @Challinor:2002zh] $$\begin{aligned} I'(\nu',\,\hat{n}^{\prime})=I(\nu,\,\hat{n}) \left(\frac{\nu'}{\nu} \right)^3, \label{eq:i_boost}\end{aligned}$$ $$\begin{aligned} \nu \vec{\beta}\cdot\hat{n}^{\prime}\big)\,,\qquad \hat{n} \frac{\hat{n}^{\prime} \left[\gamma\,\beta (\gamma - 1) (1+ \vec{\beta} \cdot\hat{n}^{\prime}) } \,, \label{eq:nu_boost}\end{aligned}$$ (1-\vec{\beta}^2)^{-1/2}$. The temperature and polarization fields $X(\hat{n})$ in CMB rest (where $X$ stands for $T,\,E$ or are similarly transformed as $$\begin{aligned
 [@2008PhRvD..78h3012E; @2008PhRvD..78l3529Z], neverthelesS the dipole Could Be lArgEr In thE casE of more exotic mODels. in addition to the dipole, a MovinG oBServER wIll alSo see veLOcITY imPrInTs aT $\eLL>1$ iN the CmB dUe to DopPler and abeRraTiOn effects [@ChaLLiNor:2002zh; @BurleS:2006xf]. such effects cAn bE measuReD as COrrelAtiOns amOng difFErent $\eLl$s, as has bEeN ProposED in Refs. [@kOSoWsky:2010Jm; @Amendola:2010ty; @NotarI:2011Sb] ANd subsequently DemonsTrATeD IN ReF. .

ThE aberratioN eFfect CHanges tHE aRRIVal DIrection of phoTons from $\hat{N}^{\PriMe}$ to $\haT{n}$, WhiCH, at linEar orDeR In $\bEta$, is compleTely DegeneratE with a LEnsing dIPole. The doppleR efFecT modULaTeS thE Cmb (an EFfEct THat Is partly DeGeNeratE witH AN INtriNsiC CMB DipolE[^7]) changing the sPecIfic INteNsity $i'$ in thE CMB ReSt fraMe to thE inteNsIty $I$ in the observEr’s fRame[^8] by a muLtiPlIcaTiVe, dirECtion-dEpeNdeNt factoR as [@1986rpa..bOOk.....R; @chALLInOr:2002zh] $$\begin{aligned}
    I'(\nU',\,\hAT{N}^{\pRime})=I(\nu,\,\hAt{n}) \lefT(\FrAc{\NU'}{\nu} \right)^3,
    \LaBel{Eq:i_bOOSt}\end{AligNEd}$$ Where $$\begIn{aligNEd}
    \Nu \,=\, \Nu^{\prime}\,\GaMma\,\big(1+ \VeC{\beTa}\cDot\haT{N}^{\priMe}\big)\,,\qQuad
    \hat{n} \,=\,  \Frac{\hAT{n}^{\prime} +  \left[\gamMA\,\beta + (\gamma - 1) \big(\HAt{N}^{\PRiME}\cdoT\haT{\beta} \big)\rigHt]\haT{\Beta}}{\GammA (1+ \VeC{\beTA} \cdot\Hat{n}^{\pRiME}) } \,,
    \lABel{eq:nu_boost}\end{aligNeD}$$ with $\gAmma \eQuiv (1-\vec{\beta}^2)^{-1/2}$. ThE temperatuRE ANd polariZatiON fIElds $X(\hat{n})$ in the cMB reSt frame (wheRE $X$ stands For $T,\,E$ Or $B$) are siMilarly trANSformed aS $$\beGin{AliGneD
 [@2008PhRvD..78h3012E; @2 008PhRvD.. 78l35 29Z ],ne vert hele ss the dipolec ould  be larger in the case  of m or e  exo t ic  mode ls. Ina dd i t ion  t othe  d i po le, a  mo ving ob server wil l a ls o see veloci t yimprints a t $ \ell>1$ in t heCMB du etoD opple r a nd ab errati o n effe cts [@Cha ll i nor:20 0 2zh; @B u r le s:20 06xf]. Such effec t sc an be measured  as co rr e la t i ons  am ong differ en t $\e l l$s, as ha s b een proposed in R efs. [@Koso w sky :2010j m;  @A m endola :2010 ty ;  @N otari:2011s b] a nd subseq uently demonst r ated in  Ref..
The  abe r ra ti onef f ect ch ang e s t he arriv al  d irect iono f p hoto nsfrom  $\ha t{n}^{\prime} $ t o $\ h at{ n}$,which , at  l inear  order  in $ \b eta$, is comple tely  degenera tewi thalensi n g dipo le.  Th e Doppl er effe c t m od u l a te s the CMB (an effe ct t ha t is par tly de g en er a te withan  in trin s i c CMB  dip o le [^7]) ch anging th especifi cintens it y $ I'$  in t h e CM B rest  frame t o the intensity $I$i n the observe r ’s f ra m e[^8 ] b y a multipl icat i ve,dire c ti on- d epend ent f ac t or as [@1986rpa..book. .. ..R; @ Chall inor:2002zh]$$\begin{a l i g ned}
   I'( \ nu ' ,\,\hat{n}^{\p rime} )=I(\nu,\, \ hat{n})\left (\frac{\ nu'}{\nu} \ right)^3 ,
  \la bel { e q: i_boost}\end{ a l igne d} $$ wher e $ $\begin {al ign ed} 
  \nu \,=\,  \nu^{\p ri me }\ ,\ gam ma\,\ b ig(1+ \v ec {\b et a}\ cdot\ h at{n}^ {\pri me}\ bi g) \ ,,\ qquad
 \ h at{n }\, =\, \f ra c{\ha t{n} ^ {\p rime} +   \left[\ gam m a\,\ be ta  + (\ga mma - 1) \big (\ hat{n}^{\p ri me} \cdot\ h a t{\beta}  \big)\right]\hat{\beta } }{\gamm a ( 1+ \v ec{\ beta} \cd ot\ hat{n} ^{\ p rime})  } \,, 
   \l abe l { eq:nu _ b oo st} \e nd{aligned } $ $ w ith $ \g amma  \equiv  (1-\vec{\beta}^2) ^ {-1 /2}$. The tem per atur e an d p o la r iza ti o n f i e lds $X(\hat{n}) $ in the C MB re st frame ( w her e$X$ sta nds for  $T,\ , E$ or $ B$) are s imilarlytr ansf o r med  as $$\beg in{align ed
 [@2008PhRvD..78h3012E;_@2008PhRvD..78l3529Z], nevertheless_the dipole could be_larger in_the_case of_more_exotic models. In_addition to the_dipole, a moving observer_will also see_velocity_imprints at $\ell>1$ in the CMB due to Doppler and aberration effects [@Challinor:2002zh; @Burles:2006xf]. Such_effects_can be_measured_as_correlations among different $\ell$s, as_has been proposed in Refs. [@Kosowsky:2010jm;_@Amendola:2010ty; @Notari:2011sb]_and subsequently demonstrated in Ref. .

The aberration effect changes_the_arrival direction of_photons from $\hat{n}^{\prime}$ to $\hat{n}$, which, at linear order_in $\beta$, is completely degenerate with_a lensing dipole._The_Doppler_effect modulates the CMB_(an effect that is partly degenerate_with an intrinsic CMB dipole[^7]) changing_the specific intensity $I'$ in the CMB_rest frame to the intensity $I$_in the observer’s frame[^8] by_a multiplicative,_direction-dependent factor as [@1986rpa..book.....R; @Challinor:2002zh] $$\begin{aligned}
_  _I'(\nu',\,\hat{n}^{\prime})=I(\nu,\,\hat{n}) \left(\frac{\nu'}{\nu}_\right)^3,
  _ \label{eq:i_boost}\end{aligned}$$ where $$\begin{aligned}
  _ \nu \,=\,_\nu^{\prime}\,\gamma\,\big(1+ \vec{\beta}\cdot\hat{n}^{\prime}\big)\,,\qquad
    \hat{n}_\,=\,_ \frac{\hat{n}^{\prime} +__\left[\gamma\,\beta_+ (\gamma_- 1) \big(\hat{n}^{\prime}\cdot\hat{\beta}_\big)\right]\hat{\beta}}{\gamma_(1+ \vec{\beta}_\cdot\hat{n}^{\prime})_} \,,
    \label{eq:nu_boost}\end{aligned}$$_with_$\gamma \equiv (1-\vec{\beta}^2)^{-1/2}$. The temperature and polarization_fields $X(\hat{n})$ in the_CMB_rest frame (where $X$_stands for $T,\,E$ or $B$)_are similarly transformed as $$\begin{aligned