 before in Section 3 and in agreement with the root identity for $\zeta_{k}$ at $\mu=0$ and Result 2 for the value of $d_{\zeta_{k}}(s_{0},0)$.

#### Case 2 - $\mu=-1$:

In this case, since the roots $\rho_{i}=\beta_{i}+i\gamma_{i}$ of $\zeta_{k}$ are mirror-symmetric in the critical line, we have, on invoking the result just proved for $r_{\zeta_{k}}(s_{0},0)$, that

$$\begin{aligned}
r_{\zeta_{k}}(s_{0},-1) & = & -\sum_{\{s_{0}-roots\:\rho_{i}\: of\:\zeta_{k}\}}(s_{0}-\rho_{i})^{1}\\
\\ & = & -(s_{0}-\frac{1}{2})r_{\zeta_{k}}(s_{0},0)+i\cdot\sum_{\{s_{0}-roots\:\rho_{i}\: of\:\zeta_{k}\}}\gamma_{i}\\
\\ & = & i\cdot\underset{z,\tilde{z}\rightarrow\infty}{Clim}\,\left\{ \int_{0}^{T}t\,\textrm{d}N(t)-\int_{0}^{\tilde{T}}\tilde{t}\,\textrm{d}N(\tilde{t})\right\} \end{aligned}$$

Using the notation from [\[]{}1[\]]{} under which $N_{i}(T)$ represents the i’th integral of $N(T)$ and similarly for $\check{N}(T)$ and $S(T)$, this becomes

$$\begin{aligned}
 &  & r_{\zeta_{k}}(s_{0},-1)\nonumber \\
\nonumber \\ & = & i\cdot\underset{z,\tilde{z}\rightarrow\infty}{Clim}\,\left\{ \left\{ TN(T)-N_{1}(T)\right\} -\left\{ \tilde{T}N(\tilde{T})-N_{1}(\tilde{T})\right\} \right\} \nonumber \\
\nonumber \\ & = & i\cdot\underset{z,\tilde{z}\rightarrow\infty}{Clim}\,\left\{ \left\{ \begin{array}{cc}
\left\{ T\check{N}(T)-\check{N}_{1}(T)\
before in Section 3 and in agreement with the root identity for $ \zeta_{k}$ at $ \mu=0 $ and Result 2 for the value of $ d_{\zeta_{k}}(s_{0},0)$. 

 # # # # subject 2 - $ \mu=-1 $: 

 In this subject, since the roots $ \rho_{i}=\beta_{i}+i\gamma_{i}$ of $ \zeta_{k}$ are mirror - symmetric in the critical line, we have, on invoking the solution just proved for $ r_{\zeta_{k}}(s_{0},0)$, that 

 $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 r_{\zeta_{k}}(s_{0},-1) & = & -\sum_{\{s_{0}-roots\:\rho_{i}\: of\:\zeta_{k}\}}(s_{0}-\rho_{i})^{1}\\ 
 \\ & = & -(s_{0}-\frac{1}{2})r_{\zeta_{k}}(s_{0},0)+i\cdot\sum_{\{s_{0}-roots\:\rho_{i}\: of\:\zeta_{k}\}}\gamma_{i}\\ 
 \\ & = & i\cdot\underset{z,\tilde{z}\rightarrow\infty}{Clim}\,\left\ { \int_{0}^{T}t\,\textrm{d}N(t)-\int_{0}^{\tilde{T}}\tilde{t}\,\textrm{d}N(\tilde{t})\right\ } \end{aligned}$$ 

 use the note from [ \[]{}1[\ ] ] { } under which $ N_{i}(T)$ represents the i’th integral of $ N(T)$ and similarly for $ \check{N}(T)$ and $ S(T)$, this becomes 

 $ $ \begin{aligned } 
  &   & r_{\zeta_{k}}(s_{0},-1)\nonumber \\ 
 \nonumber \\ & = & i\cdot\underset{z,\tilde{z}\rightarrow\infty}{Clim}\,\left\ { \left\ { TN(T)-N_{1}(T)\right\ } -\left\ { \tilde{T}N(\tilde{T})-N_{1}(\tilde{T})\right\ } \right\ } \nonumber \\ 
 \nonumber \\ & = & i\cdot\underset{z,\tilde{z}\rightarrow\infty}{Clim}\,\left\ { \left\ { \begin{array}{cc } 
 \left\ { T\check{N}(T)-\check{N}_{1}(T)\
 bevore in Section 3 and in xgreement with jhw root identjty for $\xeta_{k}$ at $\mu=0$ and Result 2 for vhe calue of $d_{\zeta_{k}}(s_{0},0)$.

#### Case 2 - $\mu=-1$:

Iv this cade, since the eoots $\rho_{i}=\usta_{i}+i\gamma_{i}$ or $\zetc_{k}$ are mirror-symketric in dhe critical lhnd, ce have, on invoking the result just [roved gog $r_{\zeta_{k}}(s_{0},0)$, that

$$\fegim{wlighvd}
v_{\zeta_{k}}(s_{0},-1) & = & -\sum_{\{s_{0}-roots\:\rho_{i}\: of\:\zeta_{k}\}}(a_{0}-\rho_{i})^{1}\\
\\ & = & -(s_{0}-\frac{1}{2})r_{\zeta_{k}}(x_{0},0)+i\cdot\sum_{\{s_{0}-roots\:\rho_{i}\: of\:\zeta_{n}\}}\gamla_{i}\\
\\ & = & i\cdot\undersft{z,\tilde{z}\rithtaweow\infty}{Clim}\,\ueft\{ \int_{0}^{T}t\,\uertrm{d}N(t)-\int_{0}^{\tjlde{T}}\tilde{t}\,\textrm{d}N(\tilde{t})\right\} \dnd{alngned}$$

Using jkw nljation from [\[]{}1[\]]{} undeg which $N_{i}(T)$ rciresentv the i’yh integral of $N(T)$ ane similarly for $\check{I}(T)$ and $S(T)$, this becomgs

$$\begin{alicnzd}
 &  & r_{\zeta_{k}}(s_{0},-1)\nonumber \\
\ninumbgr \\ & = & i\cait\uvdedsxt{z,\filde{z}\gigitarrow\inftg}{Clim}\,\left\{ \lwft\{ TN(T)-N_{1}(T)\right\} -\left\{ \tyode{T}N(\tilde{T})-N_{1}(\tjlde{T})\rygrt\} \right\} \nonumber \\
\nonumber \\ & = & i\cdot\undtrset{a,\tilde{z}\rightarrow\infty}{Coim}\,\left\{ \left\{ \begin{arrwy}{cc}
\left\{ E\check{N}(T)-\check{N}_{1}(T)\
before in Section 3 and in agreement root for $\zeta_{k}$ $\mu=0$ and Result $d_{\zeta_{k}}(s_{0},0)$. Case 2 - In this case, the roots $\rho_{i}=\beta_{i}+i\gamma_{i}$ of $\zeta_{k}$ are in the critical line, we have, on invoking the result just proved for that $$\begin{aligned} r_{\zeta_{k}}(s_{0},-1) & = & -\sum_{\{s_{0}-roots\:\rho_{i}\: of\:\zeta_{k}\}}(s_{0}-\rho_{i})^{1}\\ \\ & = & -(s_{0}-\frac{1}{2})r_{\zeta_{k}}(s_{0},0)+i\cdot\sum_{\{s_{0}-roots\:\rho_{i}\: \\ = i\cdot\underset{z,\tilde{z}\rightarrow\infty}{Clim}\,\left\{ \end{aligned}$$ Using the notation from [\[]{}1[\]]{} under which $N_{i}(T)$ represents the i’th integral of $N(T)$ and for $\check{N}(T)$ and $S(T)$, this becomes $$\begin{aligned} & r_{\zeta_{k}}(s_{0},-1)\nonumber \\ \nonumber \\ = & i\cdot\underset{z,\tilde{z}\rightarrow\infty}{Clim}\,\left\{ \left\{ TN(T)-N_{1}(T)\right\} \tilde{T}N(\tilde{T})-N_{1}(\tilde{T})\right\} \nonumber \\ \\ = i\cdot\underset{z,\tilde{z}\rightarrow\infty}{Clim}\,\left\{ \left\{ \begin{array}{cc} T\check{N}(T)-\check{N}_{1}(T)\
 before in Section 3 and in agreeMent with thE root IdeNtiTy For $\zEta_{k}$ At $\mu=0$ and Result 2 fOR the Value of $d_{\zeta_{k}}(s_{0},0)$.

#### Case 2 - $\mu=-1$:

In This cAsE, SincE ThE rootS $\rho_{i}=\beTA_{i}+I\GAmmA_{i}$ Of $\ZetA_{k}$ ARe MirroR-syMmetric In the critiCal LiNe, we have, on inVOkIng the resuLt jUst proved for $R_{\zeTa_{k}}(s_{0},0)$, thAt

$$\BegIN{aligNed}
R_{\zeta_{K}}(s_{0},-1) & = & -\sum_{\{s_{0}-ROots\:\rhO_{i}\: of\:\zeta_{k}\}}(S_{0}-\rHO_{i})^{1}\\
\\ & = & -(s_{0}-\fraC{1}{2})R_{\zeta_{k}}(s_{0},0)+I\CDoT\sum_{\{S_{0}-roots\:\rho_{i}\: of\:\zeta_{k}\}}\GAmMA_{i}\\
\\ & = & i\cdot\underseT{z,\tildE{z}\RIgHTArrOw\iNfty}{Clim}\,\leFt\{ \Int_{0}^{T}t\,\TExtrm{d}N(T)-\InT_{0}^{\TILde{t}}\Tilde{t}\,\textrm{d}n(\tilde{t})\righT\} \End{AligneD}$$

USinG The notAtion FrOM [\[]{}1[\]]{} unDer which $N_{i}(T)$ ReprEsents the I’th intEGral of $N(t)$ And simiLarly fOr $\cHecK{N}(T)$ aND $S(t)$, tHis BeCOmeS

$$\BeGin{ALigNed}
 &  & r_{\zeta_{K}}(s_{0},-1)\NoNumbeR \\
\nonUMBER \\ & = & i\cdOt\uNderSet{z,\tIlde{z}\rightarrOw\iNfty}{cLim}\,\Left\{ \lEft\{ TN(t)-N_{1}(T)\rIgHt\} -\lefT\{ \tilde{t}N(\tilDe{t})-N_{1}(\tilde{T})\right\} \riGht\} \nOnumber \\
\noNumBeR \\ & = & i\cDoT\undeRSet{z,\tiLde{Z}\riGhtarroW\infty}{CLIm}\,\lEfT\{ \LEFt\{ \Begin{array}{cc}
\left\{ T\cHeCK{n}(T)-\Check{N}_{1}(T)\
 before in Section 3 and i n agreemen t wit h t hero ot i dent ity for $\zeta _ {k}$  at $\mu=0$ and Result  2 fo rt he v a lu e of$d_{\ze t a_ { k }}( s_ {0 },0 )$ . 
####Cas e 2 - $ \mu=-1$:
Inth is case, sin c ethe roots$\r ho_{i}=\beta _{i }+i\ga mm a_{ i }$ of  $\ zeta_ {k}$ a r e mirr or-symmet ri c  in th e  critic a l  l ine,  we have, on invo k in g  the result ju st pro ve d  f o r  $r _{\ zeta_{k}}( s_ {0},0 ) $, that 
$ $ \ b egi n {aligned}
r_{ \zeta_{k}}( s _{0 },-1)&= & -\sum_ {\{s_ {0 } -ro ots\:\rho_{ i}\:  of\:\zet a_{k}\ } }(s_{0} - \rho_{i })^{1} \\\\& =&  - (s _{0 }- \ fra c {1 }{2 } )r_ {\zeta_{ k} }( s_{0} ,0)+ i \ c d ot\s um_ {\{s _{0}- roots\:\rho_{ i}\ : of \ :\z eta_{ k}\}} \gam ma _{i}\ \
\\ &  = &i\ cdot\underset{z ,\ti lde{z}\ri ght ar row \i nfty} { Clim}\ ,\l eft \{ \int _{0}^{T } t\, \t e x t rm {d}N(t)-\int_{0}^{ \t i l de {T}}\til de{t}\ , \t ex t rm{d}N(\ ti lde {t}) \ r ight\ } \e n d{ aligned} $$

Us i ng  t he nota ti on fro m[\[ ]{} 1[\]] { } un der wh ich $N_{ i}(T) $  represents th e  i’th integra l  o f $N ( T)$and  similarlyfor$ \che ck{N } (T )$a nd $S (T)$,  t h is becomes

$$\begin{a li gned} &  &  r_{\zeta_{k} }(s_{0},-1 ) \ n onumber\\
\ n on u mber \\ & = &i\cdo t\underset { z,\tilde {z}\r ightarro w\infty}{ C l im}\,\le ft\ { \ lef t\{ T N( T)-N_{1}(T)\r i g ht\}  - \left\{  \t ilde{T} N(\ til de{ T}) -N _{1}(\til de{T})\r ig ht \}  \ rig ht\}\ nonumber  \ \
\ no num ber \ \  & = &  i\cd ot\u nd er s et{ z,\tild e {z } \ righ ta rr ow\i nft y} {Clim }\,\ l eft \{ \lef t\{ \begi n{a r ray} {c c} 
\left\ { T\check{N}( T) -\check{N} _{ 1}( T)\
 before_in Section_3 and in agreement_with the_root_identity for_$\zeta_{k}$_at $\mu=0$ and_Result 2 for_the value of $d_{\zeta_{k}}(s_{0},0)$.

####_Case 2 -_$\mu=-1$:

In_this case, since the roots $\rho_{i}=\beta_{i}+i\gamma_{i}$ of $\zeta_{k}$ are mirror-symmetric in the critical line,_we_have, on_invoking_the_result just proved for $r_{\zeta_{k}}(s_{0},0)$,_that

$$\begin{aligned}
r_{\zeta_{k}}(s_{0},-1) & = & -\sum_{\{s_{0}-roots\:\rho_{i}\:_of\:\zeta_{k}\}}(s_{0}-\rho_{i})^{1}\\
\\ &_= & -(s_{0}-\frac{1}{2})r_{\zeta_{k}}(s_{0},0)+i\cdot\sum_{\{s_{0}-roots\:\rho_{i}\: of\:\zeta_{k}\}}\gamma_{i}\\
\\ & = & i\cdot\underset{z,\tilde{z}\rightarrow\infty}{Clim}\,\left\{_\int_{0}^{T}t\,\textrm{d}N(t)-\int_{0}^{\tilde{T}}\tilde{t}\,\textrm{d}N(\tilde{t})\right\}_\end{aligned}$$

Using the notation_from [\[]{}1[\]]{} under which $N_{i}(T)$ represents the i’th integral_of $N(T)$ and similarly for $\check{N}(T)$_and $S(T)$, this_becomes

$$\begin{aligned}
_&_ & r_{\zeta_{k}}(s_{0},-1)\nonumber \\
\nonumber_\\ & = & i\cdot\underset{z,\tilde{z}\rightarrow\infty}{Clim}\,\left\{ \left\{_TN(T)-N_{1}(T)\right\} -\left\{ \tilde{T}N(\tilde{T})-N_{1}(\tilde{T})\right\} \right\} \nonumber \\
\nonumber_\\ & = & i\cdot\underset{z,\tilde{z}\rightarrow\infty}{Clim}\,\left\{ \left\{ \begin{array}{cc}
\left\{_T\check{N}(T)-\check{N}_{1}(T)\