operatorname{Cen}_{G}(\varepsilon^{(1)}(H,K))$ on $\{\varepsilon_{\mathcal{C}}^{(1)}(H,K)~|~ \mathcal{C} \in R_{1}\}$. Using Wedderga [@wedd], we can see that $\operatorname{Cen}_{G}(\varepsilon^{(1)}(H,K))=G$. Suppose $q\equiv 1 (\operatorname{mod}5)$. The relations between group elements yield that $\varepsilon_{\mathcal{C}_\sigma}^{(1)}(H,K)^{x_{2}} =  \varepsilon_{\mathcal{C}_{\sigma^4}}^{(1)}(H,K)$. Hence $x_2$ does not centralize $\varepsilon_{\mathcal{C}_\sigma}^{(1)}(H,K)$. Since $G/H_1$ is cyclic of order $4$ generated by $H_1 x_1$ and $x_1^2 = x_2$, it follows that $\operatorname{Cen}_{G}(\varepsilon_{\mathcal{C_\sigma}}^{(1)}(H,K))=H_{1}$ and so the orbit of $\varepsilon_{\mathcal{C}_\sigma}^{(1)}(H,K)$ has $[G:H_1] =4$ elements, namely $\varepsilon_{\mathcal{C}_\sigma}^{(1)}(H,K)$, $\varepsilon_{\mathcal{C}_{\sigma^2}}^{(1)}(H,K)$, $\varepsilon_{\mathcal{C}_{\sigma^3}}^{(1)}(H,K)$ and $\varepsilon_{\mathcal{C}_{\sigma^4}}^{(1)}(H,K)$. Thus $R_{(H, K)} = \{C_\sigma\}.$ Hence, if $q\equiv 1 (\operatorname{mod}5)$, there is only one simple component of $\mathbb{F}_{q}G$, which by Theorem \[t1\] is isomorphic to $M_{20}(\mathbb{F}_{q})$. Next, suppose $q\equiv 2 {\rm~or~}3 (\operatorname{mod}5)$. In this case, $\mathcal{C}_{q}(H/K)$ has only one $q$-cyclotomic class namely $C_\sigma =  \{\sigma, \sigma^{2}, \sigma^{3}, \sigma^{4}\}$. So $R_{(H,K)}$ equals $ \mathcal{C}_{q}(H/K)$ and in this case also there is one simple component of $\mathbb{F}_{q}G$ isomorphic to $M_{20}(\
operatorname{Cen}_{G}(\varepsilon^{(1)}(H, K))$ on $ \{\varepsilon_{\mathcal{C}}^{(1)}(H, K)~|~ \mathcal{C } \in R_{1}\}$. Using Wedderga [ @wedd ], we can see that $ \operatorname{Cen}_{G}(\varepsilon^{(1)}(H, K))=G$. Suppose $ q\equiv 1 (\operatorname{mod}5)$. The relations between group chemical element concede that $ \varepsilon_{\mathcal{C}_\sigma}^{(1)}(H, K)^{x_{2 } } =   \varepsilon_{\mathcal{C}_{\sigma^4}}^{(1)}(H, K)$. Hence $ x_2 $ does not centralize $ \varepsilon_{\mathcal{C}_\sigma}^{(1)}(H, K)$. Since $ G / H_1 $ is cyclic of order $ 4 $ generated by $ H_1 x_1 $ and $ x_1 ^ 2 = x_2 $, it postdate that $ \operatorname{Cen}_{G}(\varepsilon_{\mathcal{C_\sigma}}^{(1)}(H, K))=H_{1}$ and so the orbit of $ \varepsilon_{\mathcal{C}_\sigma}^{(1)}(H, K)$ have $ [ G: H_1 ] = 4 $ elements, namely $ \varepsilon_{\mathcal{C}_\sigma}^{(1)}(H, K)$, $ \varepsilon_{\mathcal{C}_{\sigma^2}}^{(1)}(H, K)$, $ \varepsilon_{\mathcal{C}_{\sigma^3}}^{(1)}(H, K)$ and $ \varepsilon_{\mathcal{C}_{\sigma^4}}^{(1)}(H, K)$. Thus $ R_{(H, K) } = \{C_\sigma\}.$ Hence, if $ q\equiv 1 (\operatorname{mod}5)$, there is entirely one simple component of $ \mathbb{F}_{q}G$, which by Theorem \[t1\ ] is isomorphous to $ M_{20}(\mathbb{F}_{q})$. Next, suppose $ q\equiv 2 { \rm ~ or~}3 (\operatorname{mod}5)$. In this case, $ \mathcal{C}_{q}(H / K)$ has only one $ q$-cyclotomic class namely $ C_\sigma =   \{\sigma, \sigma^{2 }, \sigma^{3 }, \sigma^{4}\}$. So $ R_{(H, K)}$ equals $ \mathcal{C}_{q}(H / K)$ and in this event also there is one simple part of $ \mathbb{F}_{q}G$ isomorphic to $ M_{20}(\
opegatorname{Cen}_{G}(\varepsilon^{(1)}(H,Y))$ on $\{\varepsilon_{\mathcal{R}}^{(1)}(H,K)~|~ \matgcal{C} \in R_{1}\}$. Using Wedderga [@wedd], we cai sew thau $\operatorname{Cen}_{G}(\vxrepsilon^{(1)}(J,K))=G$. Suppise $w\wquiv 1 (\opecztornamc{iod}5)$. Fme renetions between nroup elemetts yield that $\vxrzpsilon_{\mathcal{C}_\sigma}^{(1)}(H,K)^{x_{2}} =  \varepsilon_{\iathcal{V}_{\slgma^4}}^{(1)}(H,K)$. Hence $x_2$ doex not bektralize $\varepsilon_{\mathcal{C}_\sigma}^{(1)}(G,K)$. Sinct $G/H_1$ is cyclic of prder $4$ generated by $H_1 x_1$ anf $x_1^2 = x_2$, it follows that $\operatornane{Ceg}_{T}(\varepsilon_{\mxthcal{C_\sigma}}^{(1)}(H,K))=H_{1}$ and so the orbit of $\varepsilon_{\mathcal{Z}_\sigmc}^{(1)}(H,K)$ has $[G:H_1] =4$ eoemftts, namely $\tarepsplon_{\mathcal{C}_\slbma}^{(1)}(H,K)$, $\earepsikon_{\mathcal{C}_{\sigka^2}}^{(1)}(H,N)$, $\vqrepsilon_{\mathcal{C}_{\sigme^3}}^{(1)}(H,K)$ and $\varepsilon_{\majhcal{C}_{\sigmd^4}}^{(1)}(H,I)$. Thus $R_{(H, K)} = \{C_\signa\}.$ Hencg, if $x\equkc 1 (\upedavorhame{mof}5)$, tiere is onlg one simplw component of $\mathnb{S}_{w}G$, which by Tgeorem \[t1\] is isomorphic to $M_{20}(\mathbb{F}_{q})$. Next, suppost $q\eqhiv 2 {\rm~or~}3 (\operatorname{mid}5)$. In this case, $\mathcwl{C}_{q}(H/K)$ haf only one $q$-cyclotomic class namely $C_\sigma =  \{\sigmd, \sigjx^{2}, \snnix^{3}, \slgma^{4}\}$. So $R_{(H,K)}$ equals $ \mathcal{C}_{q}(H/K)$ and in this cwae akso there is oke simple componeny lf $\iathbb{F}_{q}G$ isooorphie tk $M_{20}(\
operatorname{Cen}_{G}(\varepsilon^{(1)}(H,K))$ on $\{\varepsilon_{\mathcal{C}}^{(1)}(H,K)~|~ \mathcal{C} \in R_{1}\}$. Using we see that Suppose $q\equiv 1 elements that $\varepsilon_{\mathcal{C}_\sigma}^{(1)}(H,K)^{x_{2}} = Hence $x_2$ does centralize $\varepsilon_{\mathcal{C}_\sigma}^{(1)}(H,K)$. Since $G/H_1$ is cyclic order $4$ generated by $H_1 x_1$ and $x_1^2 = x_2$, it follows that and so the orbit of $\varepsilon_{\mathcal{C}_\sigma}^{(1)}(H,K)$ has $[G:H_1] =4$ elements, namely $\varepsilon_{\mathcal{C}_\sigma}^{(1)}(H,K)$, $\varepsilon_{\mathcal{C}_{\sigma^2}}^{(1)}(H,K)$, and Thus K)} \{C_\sigma\}.$ Hence, if $q\equiv 1 (\operatorname{mod}5)$, there is only one simple component of $\mathbb{F}_{q}G$, which by \[t1\] is isomorphic to $M_{20}(\mathbb{F}_{q})$. Next, suppose $q\equiv {\rm~or~}3 (\operatorname{mod}5)$. In this $\mathcal{C}_{q}(H/K)$ has only one $q$-cyclotomic namely = \{\sigma, \sigma^{3}, So equals $ \mathcal{C}_{q}(H/K)$ in this case also there is one simple component of $\mathbb{F}_{q}G$ isomorphic to $M_{20}(\
operatorname{Cen}_{G}(\varepsiloN^{(1)}(H,K))$ on $\{\varepSilon_{\MatHcaL{C}}^{(1)}(h,K)~|~ \maThcaL{C} \in R_{1}\}$. Using WeddERga [@wEdd], we can see that $\operatoRname{ceN}_{g}(\varEPsIlon^{(1)}(H,k))=G$. SuppoSE $q\EQUiv 1 (\OpErAtoRnAMe{Mod}5)$. ThE reLations Between groUp eLeMents yield thAT $\vArepsilon_{\mAthCal{C}_\sigma}^{(1)}(H,K)^{x_{2}} =  \VarEpsiloN_{\mAthCAl{C}_{\siGma^4}}^{(1)}(h,K)$. HenCe $x_2$ doeS Not cenTralize $\vaRePSilon_{\mAThcal{C}_\sIGMa}^{(1)}(h,K)$. SiNce $G/H_1$ is cyclic of orDEr $4$ GEnerated by $H_1 x_1$ anD $x_1^2 = x_2$, it fOlLOwS THat $\OpeRatorname{CEn}_{g}(\varePSilon_{\maTHcAL{c_\SigMA}}^{(1)}(H,K))=H_{1}$ and so the oRbit of $\varepSIloN_{\mathcAl{c}_\siGMa}^{(1)}(H,K)$ haS $[G:H_1] =4$ elEmENts, Namely $\varepSiloN_{\mathcal{C}_\Sigma}^{(1)}(H,k)$, $\VarepsiLOn_{\mathcAl{C}_{\sigMa^2}}^{(1)}(H,k)$, $\vaRepsILoN_{\mAthCaL{c}_{\siGMa^3}}^{(1)}(h,K)$ aND $\vaRepsilon_{\MaThCal{C}_{\sIgma^4}}^{(1)}(h,k)$. tHUs $R_{(H, k)} = \{C_\sIgma\}.$ hence, If $q\equiv 1 (\operaTorName{MOd}5)$, tHere iS only One sImPle coMponenT of $\maThBb{F}_{q}G$, which by TheOrem \[T1\] is isomorPhiC tO $M_{20}(\mAtHbb{F}_{q})$. nExt, supPosE $q\eQuiv 2 {\rm~oR~}3 (\operatORnaMe{MOD}5)$. in This case, $\mathcal{C}_{q}(H/k)$ hAS OnLy one $q$-cyClotomIC cLaSS namely $C_\SiGma =  \{\SigmA, \SIgma^{2}, \sIgma^{3}, \SIgMa^{4}\}$. So $R_{(H,K)}$ eQuals $ \mAThCaL{C}_{q}(H/K)$ anD iN this cAsE alSo tHere iS One sImple cOmponent Of $\matHBb{F}_{q}G$ isomorphiC To $M_{20}(\
operatorname{Cen}_{G}(\var epsilon^{( 1)}(H ,K) )$on  $\{ \var epsilon_{\math c al{C }}^{(1)}(H,K)~|~ \math cal{C }\ in R _ {1 }\}$.  UsingW ed d e rga  [ @w edd ], we  cansee  that $ \operatorn ame {C en}_{G}(\var e ps ilon^{(1)} (H, K))=G$. Supp ose  $q\eq ui v 1 (\ope rat ornam e{mod} 5 )$. Th e relatio ns betwee n  groupe l em ents  yield that $\var e ps i lon_{\mathcal{ C}_\si gm a }^ { ( 1)} (H, K)^{x_{2}}  =   \va r epsilon _ {\ m a t hca l {C}_{\sigma^4 }}^{(1)}(H, K )$.  Hence  $ x_2 $  doesnot c en t ral ize $\varep silo n_{\mathc al{C}_ \ sigma}^ { (1)}(H, K)$. S inc e $ G/H_ 1 $is  cy cl i c o f  o rde r  $4 $ genera te dby $H _1 x _ 1 $ and$x_ 1^2= x_2 $, it follows  th at $ \ ope rator name{ Cen} _{ G}(\v arepsi lon_{ \m athcal{C_\sigma }}^{ (1)}(H,K) )=H _{ 1}$  a nd so the or bit  of  $\vare psilon_ { \ma th c a l {C }_\sigma}^{(1)}(H, K) $ ha s $[G:H_ 1] =4$ el em e nts, nam el y $ \var e p silon _{\m a th cal{C}_\ sigma} ^ {( 1) }(H,K)$ ,$\vare ps ilo n_{ \math c al{C }_{\si gma^2}}^ {(1)} ( H,K)$, $\varep s ilon_{\mathca l {C } _ {\ s igma ^3} }^{(1)}(H,K )$ a n d $\ vare p si lon _ {\mat hcal{ C} _ {\ s igma^4}}^{(1)}(H,K) $.  Thus$R_{( H, K)} = \{C_ \sigma\}.$ H e nce, if$q\e q ui v  1 (\operatorn ame{m od}5)$, th e re is on ly on e simple  componen t of $\mat hbb {F} _{q }G$ , wh ich by Theore m \[t1 \]  is iso mor phic to  $M _{2 0}( \ma th bb{F}_{q} )$. Next ,su pp os e $ q\equ i v 2 {\rm ~o r~} 3(\o perat o rname{ mod}5 )$.In  t h iscase, $ \ ma t h cal{ C} _{ q}(H /K) $has o nlyo ne$q$-cyc lotomic c las s  nam el y$C_\sig ma =  \{\sigm a,  \sigma^{2 },  \s igma^{ 3 } , \sigma ^{4}\}$. So $R_{(H,K)}$ equals$ \ mathc al{C }_{q}(H/K )$and in  th i s case  alsothere  i s o n e  simp l e  c omp on ent of $\m a t hbb {F}_{ q} G$ i somorph ic to $M_{20}(\
operatorname{Cen}_{G}(\varepsilon^{(1)}(H,K))$ on_$\{\varepsilon_{\mathcal{C}}^{(1)}(H,K)~|~ \mathcal{C}_\in R_{1}\}$. Using Wedderga_[@wedd], we_can_see that_$\operatorname{Cen}_{G}(\varepsilon^{(1)}(H,K))=G$._Suppose $q\equiv 1_(\operatorname{mod}5)$. The relations_between group elements yield_that $\varepsilon_{\mathcal{C}_\sigma}^{(1)}(H,K)^{x_{2}} =__\varepsilon_{\mathcal{C}_{\sigma^4}}^{(1)}(H,K)$. Hence $x_2$ does not centralize $\varepsilon_{\mathcal{C}_\sigma}^{(1)}(H,K)$. Since $G/H_1$ is cyclic of order $4$_generated_by $H_1_x_1$_and_$x_1^2 = x_2$, it follows_that $\operatorname{Cen}_{G}(\varepsilon_{\mathcal{C_\sigma}}^{(1)}(H,K))=H_{1}$ and so the_orbit of_$\varepsilon_{\mathcal{C}_\sigma}^{(1)}(H,K)$ has $[G:H_1] =4$ elements, namely $\varepsilon_{\mathcal{C}_\sigma}^{(1)}(H,K)$, $\varepsilon_{\mathcal{C}_{\sigma^2}}^{(1)}(H,K)$,_$\varepsilon_{\mathcal{C}_{\sigma^3}}^{(1)}(H,K)$_and $\varepsilon_{\mathcal{C}_{\sigma^4}}^{(1)}(H,K)$. Thus_$R_{(H, K)} = \{C_\sigma\}.$ Hence, if $q\equiv 1 (\operatorname{mod}5)$,_there is only one simple component_of $\mathbb{F}_{q}G$, which_by_Theorem_\[t1\] is isomorphic to_$M_{20}(\mathbb{F}_{q})$. Next, suppose $q\equiv 2 {\rm~or~}3_(\operatorname{mod}5)$. In this case, $\mathcal{C}_{q}(H/K)$ has_only one $q$-cyclotomic class namely $C_\sigma =_ \{\sigma, \sigma^{2}, \sigma^{3}, \sigma^{4}\}$. So_$R_{(H,K)}$ equals $ \mathcal{C}_{q}(H/K)$ and_in this_case also there is one_simple component of_$\mathbb{F}_{q}G$ isomorphic_to $M_{20}(\