 gauge connection equal to the spin connection*]{}, gives the projector \[proj1\] | | \_A = - p\^P\^x\_(\^x)\_A\^[ B]{} \^[01]{} \_B. This constraint also holds in the case of flat horizon if we set $\kappa=0$. The $\tha$-independent parts of and are equal and give a second projector \[proj2\] S\_[AB]{}\^B = (V’-U’)e\^U \^1\_A - e\^[2 (U-V)]{} \^[01]{} \_[AB]{} \^B. Subtracting the $\tha$ independent parts of and gives a third projector \[proj3\] \_A= - e\^[U-2V]{} \_[AB]{}\^[0]{} \^B + e\^[-2U]{} \^P\^x\_ \^[01]{}(\^x)\_A\^[ B]{} \_B.

Finally, subtracting and we obtain an equation for the radial dependence of the spinor \_1 \_A=\_A + e\^[-U]{}\^P\^x\_ \^[01]{}(\^x)\_A\^[ B]{} \_B. \[raddep\] In total we get three projectors, -, one differential relation on the spinor and one algebraic constraint. The idea is to further simply these equations so as to ensure that we end up with two projectors. From now on we will specify to the case of spherical or hyperbolic symmetry, since this is what we will use in the paper. In order to reduce the number of projectors we impose the constraint \^P\_\^x = c e\^[2U]{} p\^P\_\^x,   x=1,2,3 \[pcq\] for some real function $c$. By squaring we obtain the algebraic condition (p\^P\_\^x)\^2= 1 which can be used to rewrite as \[ceq\] c= e\^[-2U]{}\^P\_\^x p\^P\_\^x.

Substituting in and using, we obtain the projector \[projNa\] \_A= - \_[A B]{} \^0 \^B which, squared, gives the norm of $\cZ$ ||\^2= e\^[4V - 2U]{}\[(2U’-V’)\^2 +c\^2\]. \[normZ\]

Then we can rewrite as \_A=ie\^[i ]{} \_[AB]{}\^[0]{} \^B \[proj4\]
gauge connection equal to the spin association * ] { }, render the projector \[proj1\ ] | | \_A = - p\^P\^x\_(\^x)\_A\^ [   B ] { } \^[01 ] { } \_B. This constraint also hold in the case of flat horizon if we set up $ \kappa=0$. The $ \tha$-independent contribution of and are equal and move over a second projector \[proj2\ ] S\_[AB]{}\^B = (V’-U’)e\^U \^1\_A - e\^[2 (U - V) ] { } \^[01 ] { } \_[AB ] { } \^B. subtract the $ \tha$ independent parts of and give a third projector \[proj3\ ] \_A= - e\^[U-2V ] { } \_[AB]{}\^[0 ] { } \^B + e\^[-2U ] { } \^P\^x\ _ \^[01]{}(\^x)\_A\^ [   B ] { } \_B. 

 Finally, subtract and we obtain an equation for the radial addiction of the spinor \_1 \_A=\_A + e\^[-U]{}\^P\^x\ _ \^[01]{}(\^x)\_A\^ [   B ] { } \_B. \[raddep\ ] In total we get three projector, -, one differential relation on the spinor and one algebraic constraint. The mind is to further merely these equations so as to ensure that we end up with two projectors. From now on we will intend to the case of spherical or hyperbolic symmetry, since this is what we will use in the paper. In order to reduce the number of projectors we impose the constraint \^P\_\^x = c e\^[2U ] { } p\^P\_\^x,    x=1,2,3 \[pcq\ ] for some real function $ c$. By squaring we obtain the algebraic condition (p\^P\_\^x)\^2= 1 which can be used to rewrite as \[ceq\ ] c= e\^[-2U]{}\^P\_\^x p\^P\_\^x. 

 substitute in and using, we obtain the projector \[projNa\ ] \_A= - \_[A boron ] { } \^0 \^B which, feather, gives the norm of $ \cZ$ ||\^2= e\^[4V - 2U]{}\[(2U’-V’)\^2 + c\^2\ ]. \[normZ\ ] 

 Then we can rewrite as \_A = ie\^[i ] { } \_[AB]{}\^[0 ] { } \^B \[proj4\ ]
 gakge connection equal to uhe spin connection*]{}, givev the lrojectof \[proj1\] | | \_A = - p\^P\^x\_(\^x)\_A\^[ B]{} \^[01]{} \_B. This ronsrrainu also holds in the case of vlat horuzon uf we set $\kappa=0$. Thc $\tha$-jkdepeudxnt parts of anc are equan and give a sacunb projector \[proj2\] S\_[AB]{}\^B = (V’-U’)e\^U \^1\_A - e\^[2 (U-V)]{} \^[01]{} \_[AB]{} \^B. Sibhracting the $\tra$ imqepehdent parts of and gives a third pdojectog \[proj3\] \_A= - e\^[U-2V]{} \_[AB]{}\^[0]{} \^N + e\^[-2U]{} \^P\^x\_ \^[01]{}(\^x)\_A\^[ B]{} \_B.

Finally, subtgactlng and we obtain wn equation for rhe radial ddpendence of the spinot \_1 \_A=\_A + e\^[-U]{}\^P\^x\_ \^[01]{}(\^x)\_A\^[ B]{} \_B. \[raddep\] In totau we yet three ptonefjors, -, one dihferennial relation on the vpinor snd one algebrsic cobstraint. The idea is vo further simply thgse equatimna so as to ensure tyat wg end up duth twk 'ronectord. Fcom now on se will spexify to the case of s[yerical or hylerbolyc symmetry, since this is what we will ust in fhe paper. In order to rwduce the number of ptojectors re impose the constraint \^P\_\^x = c e\^[2U]{} p\^P\_\^x,   x=1,2,3 \[pcq\] for smme rxau fbkgtiov $c$. By squaring we obtain the algebraic conditiog (p\^K\_\^x)\^2= 1 which can be msed to rewrite as \[cfq\] s= e\^[-2U]{}\^P\_\^x p\^P\_\^x.

Subrtitutnhg in and using, we ohtain tre prijector \[pwojNs\] \_A= - \_[A B]{} \^0 \^B which, squared, guves the nori of $\cZ$ ||\^2= e\^[4V - 2U]{}\[(2U’-V’)\^2 +c\^2\]. \[uormZ\]

Then we can rewrote as \_A=ie\^[i ]{} \_[AB]{}\^[0]{} \^B \[proj4\]
gauge connection equal to the spin connection*]{}, projector | | = - p\^P\^x\_(\^x)\_A\^[ also in the case flat horizon if set $\kappa=0$. The $\tha$-independent parts of are equal and give a second projector \[proj2\] S\_[AB]{}\^B = (V’-U’)e\^U \^1\_A - (U-V)]{} \^[01]{} \_[AB]{} \^B. Subtracting the $\tha$ independent parts of and gives a projector \_A= e\^[U-2V]{} \^B + e\^[-2U]{} \^P\^x\_ \^[01]{}(\^x)\_A\^[ B]{} \_B. Finally, subtracting and we obtain an equation for the dependence of the spinor \_1 \_A=\_A + e\^[-U]{}\^P\^x\_ B]{} \_B. \[raddep\] In we get three projectors, -, differential on the and algebraic The idea is further simply these equations so as to ensure that we end up with two projectors. From now we will the case spherical hyperbolic since this is will use in the paper. In the number of projectors we impose the constraint = c p\^P\_\^x, x=1,2,3 \[pcq\] for some real $c$. By squaring we obtain the algebraic condition 1 which can be used to rewrite as \[ceq\] c= e\^[-2U]{}\^P\_\^x p\^P\_\^x. Substituting in and obtain the projector \[projNa\] - \_[A B]{} \^B squared, the of $\cZ$ e\^[4V - 2U]{}\[(2U’-V’)\^2 +c\^2\]. \[normZ\] Then we can rewrite as \_A=ie\^[i \_[AB]{}\^[0]{} \^B \[proj4\]
 gauge connection equal to the Spin connecTion*]{}, gIveS thE pRojeCtor \[Proj1\] | | \_A = - p\^P\^x\_(\^x)\_A\^[ B]{} \^[01]{} \_B. ThIS conStraint also holds in the cAse of FlAT horIZoN if we Set $\kappA=0$. thE $\THa$-iNdEpEndEnT PaRts of And Are equaL and give a sEcoNd Projector \[proJ2\] s\_[Ab]{}\^B = (V’-U’)e\^U \^1\_A - e\^[2 (U-V)]{} \^[01]{} \_[aB]{} \^B. subtracting tHe $\tHa$ indePeNdeNT partS of And giVes a thIRd projEctor \[proj3\] \_a= - e\^[u-2v]{} \_[AB]{}\^[0]{} \^B + e\^[-2U]{} \^p\^X\_ \^[01]{}(\^x)\_A\^[ B]{} \_B.

FiNALlY, subTracting and we obtaIN aN Equation for the Radial DePEnDENce Of tHe spinor \_1 \_A=\_A + E\^[-U]{}\^p\^x\_ \^[01]{}(\^x)\_A\^[ B]{} \_b. \[Raddep\] IN ToTAL We gET three projectOrs, -, one diffeREntIal relAtIon ON the spInor aNd ONe aLgebraic conStraInt. The ideA is to fURther siMPly thesE equatIonS so As to ENsUrE thAt WE enD Up WitH Two ProjectoRs. frOm now On we WILL SpecIfy To thE case Of spherical or HypErboLIc sYmmetRy, sinCe thIs Is whaT we wilL use iN tHe paper. In order tO redUce the numBer Of ProJeCtors WE imposE thE coNstrainT \^P\_\^x = c e\^[2U]{} p\^p\_\^X,   x=1,2,3 \[pCq\] FOR SoMe real function $c$. By sQuARInG we obtaiN the alGEbRaIC conditiOn (P\^P\_\^x)\^2= 1 WhicH CAn be uSed tO ReWrite as \[cEq\] c= e\^[-2U]{}\^P\_\^X P\^P\_\^X.

SUbstituTiNg in anD uSinG, we ObtaiN The pRojectOr \[projNa\] \_a= - \_[A B]{} \^0 \^B wHIch, squared, giveS The norm of $\cZ$ ||\^2= e\^[4V - 2u]{}\[(2u’-V’)\^2 +C\^2\]. \[NOrMz\]

TheN we Can rewrite aS \_A=ie\^[I ]{} \_[aB]{}\^[0]{} \^B \[pRoj4\]
 gauge connection equal to  the spinconne cti on* ]{ }, g ives  the projector \[pr oj1\] | | \_A = - p\^P \^x\_ (\ ^ x)\_ A \^ [ B]{ } \^[01 ] {} \ _B.  T hi s c on s tr aintals o holds  in the ca seof  flat horizo n  i f we set $ \ka ppa=0$. The$\t ha$-in de pen d ent p art s ofand ar e  equal  and give  a second project o r  \ [pro j2\] S\_[AB]{}\^B =( V’-U’)e\^U \^1 \_A -e\ ^ [2 ( U-V )]{ } \^[01]{}  \ _[AB] { } \^B.S ub t r a cti n g the $\tha$independent par ts ofan d g i ves athird  p r oje ctor \[proj 3\]\_A= - e\ ^[U-2V ] {} \_[A B ]{}\^[0 ]{} \^ B +  e\ ^[-2 U ]{ }\^P \^ x \_\ ^[ 01] { }(\ ^x)\_A\^ [B] {} \_ B.
F i n a lly,  su btra cting  and we obtai n a n eq u ati on fo r the  rad ia l dep endenc e ofth e spinor \_1 \_ A=\_ A + e\^[- U]{ }\ ^P\ ^x \_ \^ [ 01]{}( \^x )\_ A\^[ B] {} \_B. \[r ad d e p \]  In total we get t hr e e  p rojector s, -,o ne  d i fferenti al  re lati o n  on t he s p in or and o ne alg e br ai c const ra int. T he  id eais to furt her si mply the se eq u ations so as t o  ensure thatw ee n du p wi thtwo project ors. From  now on  we willspeci fy to the case of spheric al  or hy perbo lic symmetry,  since thi s i s what w e wi l lu se in the pape r. In  order tor educe th e num ber of p rojectors w e impose  th e c ons tra i n t\^P\_\^x = ce \ ^[2U ]{ } p\^P\ _\^ x,   x= 1,2 ,3\[p cq\ ]for somereal fun ct io n$c $.By sq u aring we  o bta in  th e alg e braiccondi tion  ( p\ ^ P\_ \^x)\^2 =  1 w hich  c an  beuse dto re writ e  as  \[ceq\ ] c= e\^[ -2U ] {}\^ P\ _\ ^x p\^P \_\^x.

Subst it uting in a nd  us ing, w e obtain t he projector \[projNa\] \_A= -\_[ A B]{ } \^ 0 \^B whi ch,  squar ed, givesthe no rm of  $ \cZ $ ||\^2 = e\ ^[4 V- 2U]{}\[( 2 U ’-V ’)\^2  + c\^2 \]. \[n ormZ\]

Then we ca n  re write as \_A= ie\ ^[i] { }\_[ A B] { }\^ [0 ] {}\ ^ B \[proj4\]
 gauge_connection equal_to the spin connection*]{},_gives the_projector_\[proj1\] |_|_\_A = -_p\^P\^x\_(\^x)\_A\^[ B]{} \^[01]{} \_B._This constraint also holds_in the case_of_flat horizon if we set $\kappa=0$. The $\tha$-independent parts of and are equal and_give_a second_projector_\[proj2\]_S\_[AB]{}\^B = (V’-U’)e\^U \^1\_A -_e\^[2 (U-V)]{} \^[01]{} \_[AB]{} \^B._Subtracting the_$\tha$ independent parts of and gives a third_projector_\[proj3\] \_A= -_e\^[U-2V]{} \_[AB]{}\^[0]{} \^B + e\^[-2U]{} \^P\^x\_ \^[01]{}(\^x)\_A\^[ B]{} \_B.

Finally, subtracting_and we obtain an equation for_the radial dependence_of_the_spinor \_1 \_A=\_A +_e\^[-U]{}\^P\^x\_ \^[01]{}(\^x)\_A\^[ B]{} \_B. \[raddep\] In total_we get three projectors, -, one_differential relation on the spinor and one_algebraic constraint. The idea is to_further simply these equations so_as to_ensure that we end up_with two projectors._From now_on we will_specify to the case of spherical_or hyperbolic symmetry,_since this is what we will_use_in the paper._In_order_to reduce_the number of_projectors_we impose_the_constraint \^P\_\^x = c e\^[2U]{} p\^P\_\^x,_  x=1,2,3_\[pcq\] for some real function $c$. By_squaring we obtain the_algebraic_condition (p\^P\_\^x)\^2= 1 which_can be used to rewrite_as \[ceq\] c= e\^[-2U]{}\^P\_\^x p\^P\_\^x.

Substituting in_and using,_we obtain_the projector \[projNa\] \_A= - \_[A B]{} \^0 \^B which, squared,_gives the norm of $\cZ$ ||\^2=_e\^[4V - 2U]{}\[(2U’-V’)\^2 +c\^2\]._\[normZ\]

Then we_can_rewrite as \_A=ie\^[i_]{}_\_[AB]{}\^[0]{} \^B_\[proj4\]