c}},
\widetilde{\mathcal{\mathbf{P}}^{c}}^{\prime })$ is an element of H$^{1}(\mathcal{\mathbf{B}}^c
,\mathbf{Z}_{2}).$   By definition, we have $$\delta _{ij}(x)=\gamma _{ij}(x)\Psi (\gamma _{ij}^{\prime }(x)^{-1}) \:,$$ and $$\rho (\gamma _{ij})=\rho (\gamma _{ij}^{\prime })=g_{ij} \:.$$ This implies that $$\begin{aligned}
\rho (\delta _{ij}) &=&1 \\
&\Longrightarrow &\delta _{ij}(x)\in \mathbf{Z}_{2}\end{aligned}$$ i.e., $\delta _{ij}$ is in the center of $\Gamma $ and $$\begin{aligned}
(d\delta )(ijk) &=&\delta _{jk}\delta _{ik}^{-1}\delta _{ij}\nonumber \\
&=&\gamma _{ji}\Psi (\gamma _{jk}^{\prime -1})(\gamma _{ik}\Psi (\gamma
_{ik}^{\prime -1}))\gamma _{ij}\Psi (\gamma _{ij}^{\prime -1}) \nonumber \\
&=&\gamma _{jk}\Psi (\gamma _{jk}^{\prime -1})(\Psi (\gamma _{ik}^{\prime
})\gamma _{ik}^{-1})\gamma _{ji}\Psi (\gamma _{ij}^{\prime -1})\nonumber \\
&=&\gamma _{jk}(\gamma _{ij}\Psi (\gamma _{ij}^{\prime -1}))\Psi (\gamma
_{jk}^{\prime -1})(\Psi (\gamma _{ik}^{\prime })\gamma _{ik}^{-1})\text{
since }\delta _{ij}\in C(\Gamma )\nonumber \\
&=&\gamma _{jk}\gamma _{ij}\Psi (\gamma _{ij}^{\prime -1}\gamma
_{jk}^{\prime -1}\gamma _{ik}^{\prime })\gamma _{ik}^{-1} \nonumber \\
&=&1.\end{aligned}$$ Hence $\delta _{ij}\in $ $H^{1}(\mathcal{\mathbf{B}},\mathbf{Z}_{2})$ . A similar proof works for $
\overline{\delta }_{ij}$.  The difference class can be used to define an equivalence relation among the $\Gamma -$ structures.  In fact, we have $\widetilde{\mathcal{\mathbf{P}}}\simeq _{W}\widetilde{\mathcal{\mathbf{P}}}^{\prime }$ iff $\overline{\delta }(%
\widetilde{\mathcal{\
c } }, 
 \widetilde{\mathcal{\mathbf{P}}^{c}}^{\prime }) $ is an element of H$^{1}(\mathcal{\mathbf{B}}^c 
, \mathbf{Z}_{2}).$    By definition, we have $ $ \delta _ { ij}(x)=\gamma _ { ij}(x)\Psi (\gamma _ { ij}^{\prime } (x)^{-1 }) \:,$$ and $ $ \rho (\gamma _ { ij})=\rho (\gamma _ { ij}^{\prime }) = g_{ij } \:.$$ This implies that $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 \rho (\delta _ { ij }) & = & 1 \\ 
 & \Longrightarrow & \delta _ { ij}(x)\in \mathbf{Z}_{2}\end{aligned}$$ i.e., $ \delta _ { ij}$   is in the center of $ \Gamma $   and $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 (d\delta) (ijk) & = & \delta _ { jk}\delta _ { ik}^{-1}\delta _ { ij}\nonumber \\ 
 & = & \gamma _ { ji}\Psi (\gamma _ { jk}^{\prime -1})(\gamma _ { ik}\Psi (\gamma 
 _ { ik}^{\prime -1}))\gamma _ { ij}\Psi (\gamma _ { ij}^{\prime -1 }) \nonumber \\ 
 & = & \gamma _ { jk}\Psi (\gamma _ { jk}^{\prime -1})(\Psi (\gamma _ { ik}^{\prime 
 }) \gamma _ { ik}^{-1})\gamma _ { ji}\Psi (\gamma _ { ij}^{\prime -1})\nonumber \\ 
 & = & \gamma _ { jk}(\gamma _ { ij}\Psi (\gamma _ { ij}^{\prime -1}))\Psi (\gamma 
 _ { jk}^{\prime -1})(\Psi (\gamma _ { ik}^{\prime }) \gamma _ { ik}^{-1})\text { 
 since } \delta _ { ij}\in C(\Gamma) \nonumber \\ 
 & = & \gamma _ { jk}\gamma _ { ij}\Psi (\gamma _ { ij}^{\prime -1}\gamma 
 _ { jk}^{\prime -1}\gamma _ { ik}^{\prime }) \gamma _ { ik}^{-1 } \nonumber \\ 
 & = & 1.\end{aligned}$$ therefore $ \delta _ { ij}\in $ $ H^{1}(\mathcal{\mathbf{B}},\mathbf{Z}_{2})$  . A exchangeable proof works for $ 
 \overline{\delta } _ { ij}$.   The remainder course can be used to define an equivalence sexual intercourse among the $ \Gamma -$ structures.   In fact, we have $ \widetilde{\mathcal{\mathbf{P}}}\simeq _ { W}\widetilde{\mathcal{\mathbf{P}}}^{\prime } $ iff $ \overline{\delta } (% 
 \widetilde{\mathcal{\
c}},
\wifetilde{\mathcal{\mathbf{P}}^{c}}^{\prlme })$ is an elemeur of H$^{1}(\kathcam{\mathbf{B}}^z
,\mathbf{Z}_{2}).$   By definition, we heve $$\eelta _{ij}(x)=\gamma _{ij}(x)\Psi (\gamma _{ij}^{\prime }(q)^{-1}) \:,$$ and $$\rhi (\ganna _{ij})=\rho (\gejma _{ij}^{\pvnme })=g_{jm} \:.$$ Thns implies that $$\negin{aligneg}
\rho (\delta _{ij}) &=&1 \\
&\Lunyrightarrow &\delta _{ij}(x)\in \mathbf{Z}_{2}\end{alygned}$$ i.r., $\felta _{ij}$ is in jhe ctntqr or $\Gamma $ and $$\begin{aligned}
(d\delta )(ijk) &=&\delta _{ok}\delta _{ik}^{-1}\delta _{ij}\nonumber \\
&=&\gamma _{ji}\Psi (\galma _{uk}^{\prime -1})(\gamma _{ik}\Psl (\gamma
_{ik}^{\prume -1}))\dqmma _{ij}\Psi (\gxmma _{ij}^{\prime -1}) \nonumber \\
&=&\gamma _{jk}\Psi (\gamma _{jk}^{\prime -1})(\Psi (\eamma _{ik}^{\prime
})\ganmq _{in}^{-1})\camma _{ji}\Psi (\gammw _{ij}^{\prime -1})\noklmber \\
&=&\gdmma _{jk}(\bamma _{ij}\Psi (\gakma _{ij}^{\prime -1}))\Psi (\gamma
_{jk}^{\primx -1})(\Psi (\gamma _{ik}^{\prime })\damma _{ik}^{-1})\taxc{
since }\delta _{ij}\in C(\Ganmq )\nonomber \\
&=&\gamoq _{jy}\gajme _{in}\Psi (\gwmme _{ij}^{\prime -1}\gzmma
_{jk}^{\prime -1}\gamma _{ik}^{\prime })\gamms _{yj}^{-1} \nonumber \\
&=&1.\ens{alignqd}$$ Hence $\delta _{ij}\in $ $H^{1}(\mathcal{\mathbf{B}},\mathbx{Z}_{2})$ . Z similar proof works fir $
\overline{\delta }_{ij}$.  Tje differqnce class can be used to define an equivalence ralatikv anokg tfw $\Hamma -$ structures.  In fact, we have $\widetilde{\maegcsl{\kathbf{P}}}\simeq _{W}\cidetilde{\mathcal{\kahhns{P}}}^{\prime }$ iff $\uverlius{\dslta }(%
\widetilde{\mathfal{\
c}}, \widetilde{\mathcal{\mathbf{P}}^{c}}^{\prime })$ is an element of By we have _{ij}(x)=\gamma _{ij}(x)\Psi (\gamma (\gamma (\gamma _{ij}^{\prime })=g_{ij} This implies that \rho (\delta _{ij}) &=&1 \\ &\Longrightarrow _{ij}(x)\in \mathbf{Z}_{2}\end{aligned}$$ i.e., $\delta _{ij}$ is in the center of $\Gamma $ and (d\delta )(ijk) &=&\delta _{jk}\delta _{ik}^{-1}\delta _{ij}\nonumber \\ &=&\gamma _{ji}\Psi (\gamma _{jk}^{\prime -1})(\gamma _{ik}\Psi _{ik}^{\prime _{ij}\Psi _{ij}^{\prime \nonumber \\ &=&\gamma _{jk}\Psi (\gamma _{jk}^{\prime -1})(\Psi (\gamma _{ik}^{\prime })\gamma _{ik}^{-1})\gamma _{ji}\Psi (\gamma _{ij}^{\prime -1})\nonumber \\ _{jk}(\gamma _{ij}\Psi (\gamma _{ij}^{\prime -1}))\Psi (\gamma _{jk}^{\prime -1})(\Psi _{ik}^{\prime })\gamma _{ik}^{-1})\text{ since _{ij}\in C(\Gamma )\nonumber \\ &=&\gamma _{ij}\Psi _{ij}^{\prime -1}\gamma -1}\gamma })\gamma \nonumber \\ &=&1.\end{aligned}$$ $\delta _{ij}\in $ $H^{1}(\mathcal{\mathbf{B}},\mathbf{Z}_{2})$ . A similar proof works for $ \overline{\delta }_{ij}$. The difference class can used to equivalence relation the -$ In fact, we _{W}\widetilde{\mathcal{\mathbf{P}}}^{\prime }$ iff $\overline{\delta }(% \widetilde{\mathcal{\
c}},
\widetilde{\mathcal{\mathbf{P}}^{c}}^{\Prime })$ is an eLemenT of h$^{1}(\maThCal{\mAthbF{B}}^c
,\mathbf{Z}_{2}).$   By deFInitIon, we have $$\delta _{ij}(x)=\gamma _{Ij}(x)\PsI (\gAMma _{iJ}^{\PrIme }(x)^{-1}) \:,$$ aNd $$\rho (\gaMMa _{IJ})=\Rho (\GaMmA _{ij}^{\PrIMe })=G_{ij} \:.$$ ThIs iMplies tHat $$\begin{alIgnEd}
\Rho (\delta _{ij}) &=&1 \\
&\LoNGrIghtarrow &\dEltA _{ij}(x)\in \mathbf{z}_{2}\enD{alignEd}$$ I.e., $\dELta _{ij}$ Is iN the cEnter oF $\gamma $ aNd $$\begin{alIgNEd}
(d\delTA )(ijk) &=&\delTA _{Jk}\DeltA _{ik}^{-1}\delta _{ij}\nonumbeR \\
&=&\GaMMa _{ji}\Psi (\gamma _{jk}^{\Prime -1})(\gAmMA _{iK}\pSi (\gAmmA
_{ik}^{\prime -1}))\gaMmA _{ij}\PsI (\Gamma _{ij}^{\PRiME -1}) \NOnuMBer \\
&=&\gamma _{jk}\Psi (\Gamma _{jk}^{\primE -1})(\psi (\Gamma _{iK}^{\pRimE
})\Gamma _{iK}^{-1})\gammA _{jI}\psi (\Gamma _{ij}^{\primE -1})\nonUmber \\
&=&\gammA _{jk}(\gamMA _{ij}\Psi (\gAMma _{ij}^{\prIme -1}))\Psi (\GamMa
_{jK}^{\priME -1})(\PSi (\GamMa _{IK}^{\prIMe })\GamMA _{ik}^{-1})\Text{
sincE }\dElTa _{ij}\iN C(\GaMMA )\NOnumBer \\
&=&\GammA _{jk}\gaMma _{ij}\Psi (\gamma _{Ij}^{\pRime -1}\GAmmA
_{jk}^{\prIme -1}\gaMma _{iK}^{\pRime })\gAmma _{ik}^{-1} \NonumBeR \\
&=&1.\end{aligned}$$ HencE $\delTa _{ij}\in $ $H^{1}(\maThcAl{\MatHbF{B}},\matHBf{Z}_{2})$ . A siMilAr pRoof worKs for $
\ovERliNe{\DELTa }_{Ij}$.  The difference claSs CAN bE used to dEfine aN EqUiVAlence reLaTioN amoNG The $\GaMma -$ sTRuCtures.  In Fact, we HAvE $\wIdetildE{\mAthcal{\MaThbF{P}}}\sImeq _{W}\WIdetIlde{\maThcal{\matHbf{P}}}^{\pRIme }$ iff $\overline{\DElta }(%
\widetilde{\MAtHCAl{\
c}},
\widetilde{\mathcal{\ mathbf{P}} ^{c}} ^{\ pri me  })$  isan element ofH $^{1 }(\mathcal{\mathbf{B}} ^c
,\ ma t hbf{ Z }_ {2}). $   Byd ef i n iti on ,weha v e$$\de lta  _{ij}( x)=\gamma_{i j} (x)\Psi (\ga m ma  _{ij}^{\p rim e }(x)^{-1})  \: ,$$ an d$$\ r ho (\ gam ma _{ ij})=\ r ho (\g amma _{ij }^ { \prime })=g_{i j }  \ :.$$  This implies tha t  $ $ \begin{aligned }
\rho  ( \ de l t a _ {ij }) &=&1 \\ 
& \Long r ightarr o w& \ d elt a  _{ij}(x)\in\mathbf{Z}_ { 2}\ end{al ig ned } $$ i.e ., $\ de l ta_{ij}$ is i n th e centerof $\G a mma $ a n d $$\be gin{al ign ed} 
(d\ d el ta  )( ij k ) & = &\ del t a _ {jk}\del ta  _ {ik}^ {-1} \ d e l ta _ {ij }\no numbe r \\
&=&\gamm a _ {ji} \ Psi  (\ga mma _ {jk} ^{ \prim e -1}) (\gam ma  _{ik}\Psi (\ga mma_{ik}^{\p rim e-1} )) \gamm a  _{ij} \Ps i ( \gamma_{ij}^{ \ pri me - 1 })  \nonumber \\
&=&\ ga m m a_{jk}\Ps i (\ga m ma  _ { jk}^{\pr im e - 1})( \ P si (\ gamm a  _ {ik}^{\p rime
} ) \g am ma _{ik }^ {-1})\ ga mma  _{ ji}\P s i (\ gamma_{ij}^{\ prime -1})\nonumber\ \
&=&\gamma _ { jk } ( \g a mma_{i j}\Psi (\ga mma_ {ij} ^{\p r im e - 1 }))\P si (\ ga m ma _{jk}^{\prime -1})( \P si (\g amma_{ik}^{\prime  })\gamma_ { i k}^{-1}) \tex t {s ince }\delta _ {ij}\ in C(\Gamm a  )\nonum ber \ \
&=&\ga mma _{jk} \ g amma _{i j}\ Psi  (\ gam m a  _ {ij}^{\prime- 1 }\ga mm a
_{jk} ^{\ prime - 1}\ gam ma_{i k} ^{\prime})\gamma  _ {i k} ^{ -1}  \non u mber \\&= &1. \e nd{ align e d}$$ H ence$\de lt a_ {ij }\in $$ H^ { 1 }(\m at hc al{\ mat hb f{B}} ,\ma t hbf {Z}_{2} )$ . A si mil a r pr oo fworks f or $
\overlin e{ \delta }_{ ij }$.   Thed i fference  class can be used to d e fine an  eq uival ence  relation  am ong th e $ \ Gamma-$ str uctur es . I n  fact , we  ha ve  $\widetil d e {\m athca l{ \mat hbf{P}} }\simeq _{W}\widet i lde {\mathcal{\ma thb f{P} } } ^{ \pr i me }$if f  $\ o v erline{\delta } (%
\wideti ld e {\ mathcal{\
c}},
\widetilde{\mathcal{\mathbf{P}}^{c}}^{\prime })$_is an_element of H$^{1}(\mathcal{\mathbf{B}}^c
,\mathbf{Z}_{2}).$  _By definition,_we_have $$\delta__{ij}(x)=\gamma__{ij}(x)\Psi (\gamma _{ij}^{\prime_}(x)^{-1}) \:,$$ and_$$\rho (\gamma _{ij})=\rho (\gamma__{ij}^{\prime })=g_{ij} \:.$$_This_implies that $$\begin{aligned}
\rho (\delta _{ij}) &=&1 \\
&\Longrightarrow &\delta _{ij}(x)\in \mathbf{Z}_{2}\end{aligned}$$ i.e., $\delta _{ij}$ is in_the_center of_$\Gamma_$ and_$$\begin{aligned}
(d\delta )(ijk) &=&\delta _{jk}\delta _{ik}^{-1}\delta__{ij}\nonumber \\
&=&\gamma _{ji}\Psi (\gamma _{jk}^{\prime_-1})(\gamma _{ik}\Psi_(\gamma
_{ik}^{\prime -1}))\gamma _{ij}\Psi (\gamma _{ij}^{\prime -1}) \nonumber \\
&=&\gamma__{jk}\Psi_(\gamma _{jk}^{\prime -1})(\Psi_(\gamma _{ik}^{\prime
})\gamma _{ik}^{-1})\gamma _{ji}\Psi (\gamma _{ij}^{\prime -1})\nonumber \\
&=&\gamma _{jk}(\gamma__{ij}\Psi (\gamma _{ij}^{\prime -1}))\Psi (\gamma
_{jk}^{\prime -1})(\Psi_(\gamma _{ik}^{\prime })\gamma__{ik}^{-1})\text{
since_}\delta__{ij}\in C(\Gamma )\nonumber \\
&=&\gamma__{jk}\gamma _{ij}\Psi (\gamma _{ij}^{\prime -1}\gamma
_{jk}^{\prime -1}\gamma__{ik}^{\prime })\gamma _{ik}^{-1} \nonumber \\
&=&1.\end{aligned}$$ Hence_$\delta _{ij}\in $ $H^{1}(\mathcal{\mathbf{B}},\mathbf{Z}_{2})$ . A similar proof_works for $
\overline{\delta }_{ij}$.  The difference_class can be used to_define an_equivalence relation among the $\Gamma_-$ structures.  In_fact, we_have $\widetilde{\mathcal{\mathbf{P}}}\simeq _{W}\widetilde{\mathcal{\mathbf{P}}}^{\prime_}$ iff $\overline{\delta }(%
\widetilde{\mathcal{\