 $u_\vartheta$ satisfies $$\label{eq:linearized-angle}
\left\{
  \begin{aligned}
-\Delta u_\vartheta&= f'(u)u_\vartheta &&\qquad \text{in $\Omega$,}\\
u_\vartheta & = 0 &&\qquad \text{on $\partial \Omega$.}    
  \end{aligned}
\right.$$ Suppose by contradiction that $u_\vartheta \not \equiv 0$. Then $u_\vartheta$ is a Dirichlet eigenfunction of $-\Delta- f'(u)$ corresponding to the eigenvalue $0$. Moreover, since $u$ is $2\pi$-periodic in $\vartheta$, $u_\theta$ changes sign. This implies that the first Dirichlet eigenvalue of $-\Delta - f'(u)$ is negative, which contradicts our assumption that $m(u)=0$.

Hence is satisfied, and it also holds true for an arbitrary rotation $\tilde u$ of the function $u$ since $\tilde u$ satisfies the same assumptions as $u$. Consequently, $u$ is a radial sign changing solution of. However, then [@AftalionPacella Theorem 1.1] implies that $m(u) \ge N+1>0$, which is a contradiction. We thus conclude that $m(u) \ge 1$ for every nodal solution $u$ of, as claimed in (ii).\
Next, let $u \in C^1_0(\Omega)$ be a nodal solution with $I(u)= c_{nod}$ (such a solution exists by Theorem \[thm:lensachieved\]). By (ii) and Theorem \[prop:boundmorseindex\], we have $m(u)=1$, so (i) follows by Theorem \[sec:lens-mp\]. It also follows from Theorem \[sec:lens-mp\] that $u$ is of mountain pass type. Moreover, by [@AftalionPacella Theorem 1.1], $u$ is nonradial.

Next we prove that $u$ is foliated Schwarz symmetric. Let $x_0 \in \Omega \setminus \{0\}$ be chosen such that $u(x_0)=\max \{u(x)\::\: |x|=|x_0|\}$. We put $e:=\frac{x_0}{|x_0|}$, and we consider the family ${{\mathcal H}}_e$ of all open halfspaces
$ u_\vartheta$ satisfies $ $ \label{eq: linearized - angle } 
 \left\ { 
   \begin{aligned } 
 -\Delta u_\vartheta&= f'(u)u_\vartheta & & \qquad \text{in $ \Omega$,}\\ 
 u_\vartheta & = 0 & & \qquad \text{on $ \partial \Omega$. }    
   \end{aligned } 
 \right.$$ Suppose by contradiction that $ u_\vartheta \not \equiv 0$. Then $ u_\vartheta$ is a Dirichlet eigenfunction of $ -\Delta- f'(u)$ corresponding to the eigenvalue $ 0$. Moreover, since $ u$ is $ 2\pi$-periodic in $ \vartheta$, $ u_\theta$ change sign of the zodiac. This implies that the first Dirichlet eigenvalue of $ -\Delta - f'(u)$ is negative, which contradict our assumption that $ m(u)=0$. 

 Hence is quenched, and it also holds true for an arbitrary rotation $ \tilde u$ of the affair $ u$ since $ \tilde u$ satisfies the same assumptions as $ u$. Consequently, $ u$ is a radial polarity changing solution of. However, then [ @AftalionPacella Theorem 1.1 ] implies that $ m(u) \ge N+1>0 $, which is a contradiction. We therefore conclude that $ m(u) \ge 1 $ for every nodal solution $ u$ of, as claimed in (ii).\ 
 Next, let $ u \in C^1_0(\Omega)$ be a nodal solution with $ I(u)= c_{nod}$ (such a solution exists by Theorem   \[thm: lensachieved\ ]). By (ii) and Theorem   \[prop: boundmorseindex\ ], we have $ m(u)=1 $, so (i) succeed by Theorem   \[sec: lens - mp\ ]. It also follows from Theorem   \[sec: lens - mp\ ] that $ u$ is of batch pass type. furthermore, by [ @AftalionPacella Theorem 1.1 ], $ u$ is nonradial. 

 Next we prove that $ u$ is foliate Schwarz symmetric. Let $ x_0 \in \Omega \setminus \{0\}$ be chosen such that $ u(x_0)=\max \{u(x)\::\: |x|=|x_0|\}$. We put $ e:=\frac{x_0}{|x_0|}$, and we consider the family $ { { \mathcal H}}_e$ of all clear halfspaces
 $u_\vwrtheta$ satisfies $$\label{ed:linearized-anglg}
\lwft\{
  \bxgin{alifned}
-\Deltx u_\vartheta&= f'(u)u_\vartheta &&\qquav \tezt{in $\Imega$,}\\
u_\vartheta & = 0 &&\qquaa \text{on $\iartial \Onega$.}    
  \end{almfned}
\rigmc.$$ Supllse yy contradiction that $u_\vardheta \not \equie 0$. Tken $u_\vartheta$ is a Dirichlet eigenfugction pf $-\Delta- f'(u)$ corrgsponcyng fo the eigenvalue $0$. Moreover, since $h$ is $2\pi$-keriodic in $\vartheya$, $u_\theta$ changes sign. Thid imolies that the firdt Dirichlej eidwnvalue of $-\Ddlta - f'(u)$ is negative, wgich contradicts our assumption that $m(u)=0$.

Hence iw watlvfied, and iv also holds true npr an drbitraty rotation $\tikde u$ if the function $u$ sinre $\tilde u$ satisfies the same aasumptions as $u$. Cinwequettly, $u$ ir a fadjak aign cjanjing solutikn of. Howevwr, then [@AftalionPactllw Theorem 1.1] impmies trae $m(u) \ge N+1>0$, which is a contradiction. We tvus conclude that $m(u) \ge 1$ fir every nodal solutiln $u$ of, af claimed in (ii).\
Next, let $u \in C^1_0(\Omega)$ be a nodal sonutioi ditk $I(u)= c_{vid}$ (such a solution exists by Theorem \[thm:lensachiqbec\]). Ny (ii) and Theorei \[prop:boundmprdeogdex\], we have $o(u)=1$, so (n) fkllows by Theorem \[sfc:lens-mk\]. It aoso follors ftom Theorem \[sec:lens-mp\] that $u$ is of mountcin pass type. Moreovex, by [@AftaliouPacelka Throrem 1.1], $u$ is nonradial.

Nert we lrove that $k$ is folizged Schwarz symmdtrpc. Lat $x_0 \in \Omega \setminus \{0\}$ be chosen snch tkat $u(x_0)=\mab \{u(x)\::\: |x|=|x_0|\}$. We put $e:=\frac{d_0}{|x_0|}$, and we consider the fwmily ${{\mdthcal H}}_e$ lf all open halfspaces
$u_\vartheta$ satisfies $$\label{eq:linearized-angle} \left\{ \begin{aligned} -\Delta u_\vartheta&= \text{in u_\vartheta & 0 &&\qquad \text{on by that $u_\vartheta \not 0$. Then $u_\vartheta$ a Dirichlet eigenfunction of $-\Delta- f'(u)$ to the eigenvalue $0$. Moreover, since $u$ is $2\pi$-periodic in $\vartheta$, $u_\theta$ changes This implies that the first Dirichlet eigenvalue of $-\Delta - f'(u)$ is negative, contradicts assumption $m(u)=0$. is satisfied, and it also holds true for an arbitrary rotation $\tilde u$ of the function since $\tilde u$ satisfies the same assumptions as Consequently, $u$ is a sign changing solution of. However, [@AftalionPacella 1.1] implies $m(u) N+1>0$, is a contradiction. thus conclude that $m(u) \ge 1$ for every nodal solution $u$ of, as claimed in (ii).\ Next, $u \in a nodal with c_{nod}$ a solution exists \[thm:lensachieved\]). By (ii) and Theorem \[prop:boundmorseindex\], so (i) follows by Theorem \[sec:lens-mp\]. It also from Theorem that $u$ is of mountain pass Moreover, by [@AftalionPacella Theorem 1.1], $u$ is nonradial. we prove that $u$ is foliated Schwarz symmetric. Let $x_0 \in \Omega \setminus \{0\}$ be that $u(x_0)=\max \{u(x)\::\: |x|=|x_0|\}$. put $e:=\frac{x_0}{|x_0|}$, and consider family H}}_e$ all open
 $u_\vartheta$ satisfies $$\label{eq:Linearized-Angle}
\LefT\{
  \beGiN{aliGned}
-\delta u_\vartheta&= F'(U)u_\vaRtheta &&\qquad \text{in $\Omega$,}\\
U_\vartHeTA & = 0 &&\qquAD \tExt{on $\Partial \oMeGA$.}    
  \End{AlIgNed}
\RiGHt.$$ suppoSe bY contraDiction thaT $u_\vArTheta \not \equiV 0$. thEn $u_\varthetA$ is A Dirichlet eiGenFunctiOn Of $-\DELta- f'(u)$ CorRespoNding tO The eigEnvalue $0$. MoReOVer, sinCE $u$ is $2\pi$-pERIoDic iN $\vartheta$, $u_\theta$ chANgES sign. This impliEs that ThE FiRST DiRicHlet eigenvAlUe of $-\DELta - f'(u)$ is NEgATIVe, wHIch contradictS our assumptIOn tHat $m(u)=0$.

HEnCe iS SatisfIed, anD iT AlsO holds true fOr an Arbitrary RotatiON $\tilde u$ OF the funCtion $u$ SinCe $\tIlde U$ SaTiSfiEs THe sAMe AssUMptIons as $u$. COnSeQuentLy, $u$ iS A RADial SigN chaNging Solution of. HowEveR, theN [@aftAlionpacelLa ThEoRem 1.1] imPlies tHat $m(u) \Ge n+1>0$, which is a contraDictIon. We thus ConClUde ThAt $m(u) \gE 1$ For eveRy nOdaL solutiOn $u$ of, as CLaiMeD IN (Ii).\
next, let $u \in C^1_0(\Omega)$ be A nODAl Solution With $I(u)= C_{NoD}$ (sUCh a solutIoN exIsts BY theorEm \[thM:LeNsachievEd\]). By (ii) ANd thEorem \[prOp:BoundmOrSeiNdeX\], we haVE $m(u)=1$, sO (i) follOws by TheOrem \[sEC:lens-mp\]. It also fOLlows from TheoREm \[SEC:lENs-mp\] ThaT $u$ is of mountAin pASs tyPe. MoREoVer, BY [@AftaLionPAcELlA theorem 1.1], $u$ is nonradial.

neXt we prOve thAt $u$ is foliated schwarz symMETRic. Let $x_0 \iN \OmeGA \sETminus \{0\}$ be chosen Such tHat $u(x_0)=\max \{u(x)\::\: |X|=|X_0|\}$. We put $e:=\fRac{x_0}{|x_0|}$, And we conSider the fAMIly ${{\mathcAl H}}_E$ of All OpeN HAlFspaces
 $u_\vartheta$ satisfies $ $\label{eq :line ari zed -a ngle }
\l eft\{
  \begin { alig ned}
-\Delta u_\varthe ta&=f' ( u)u_ \ va rthet a &&\qq u ad \ tex t{ in  $\ Om e ga $,}\\ 
u_ \varthe ta & = 0 & &\q qu ad \text{on$ \p artial \Om ega $.}    
  \e nd{ aligne d} 
\r i ght.$ $ S uppos e by c o ntradi ction tha t$ u_\var t heta \n o t  \ equi v 0$. Then $u_\va r th e ta$ is a Diric hlet e ig e nf u n cti onof $-\Delt a-  f'(u ) $ corre s po n d i ngt o the eigenva lue $0$. Mo r eov er, si nc e $ u $ is $ 2\pi$ -p e rio dic in $\va rthe ta$, $u_\ theta$ changes sign. T his im pli esthat th efir st Dir i ch let eig envalueof  $ -\Del ta - f ' ( u)$isnega tive,  which contra dic ts o u r a ssump tionthat  $ m(u)= 0$.

H enceis  satisfied, and  italso hold s t ru e f or  an a r bitrar y r ota tion $\ tilde u $  of  t h e fu nction $u$ since $ \t i l de  u$ sati sfiest he  s a me assum pt ion s as $ u$. C onse q ue ntly, $u $ is a ra di al sign  c hangin gsol uti on of .  How ever,then [@A ftali o nPacella Theor e m 1.1] implie s  t h a t$ m(u)  \g e N+1>0$, w hich is a  con t ra dic t ion.We th us co n clude that $m(u) \g e1$ for  ever y nodal solut ion $u$ of , a s claime d in (i i ).\
Next, let$u \i n C^1_0(\O m ega)$ be  a no dal solu tion with $ I(u)= c_ {no d}$  (s uch a  s olution exist s by T he orem \[ thm :lensac hie ved \]) . B y(ii) andTheorem\[ pr op :b oun dmors e index\],  w e h av e $ m(u)= 1 $, so(i) f ollo ws  b y  Th eorem \ [ se c : lens -m p\ ]. I t a ls o fol lows fro m Theor em \[sec: len s -mp\ ]th at $u$is of mountai npass type.  M ore over,b y  [@Aftal ionPacella Theorem 1.1] ,  $u$ is  no nradi al.
Next wepro ve tha t $ u $ is f oliate d Sch wa rzs y mmetr i c .Let  $ x_0 \in \O m e ga\setm in us \ {0\}$ b e chosen such that $u( x_0)=\max \{u (x) \::\ : |x |=| x _0 | \}$ .W e p u t  $e:=\frac{x_0} {|x_0|}$,an d  w e consider the  f amily $ {{\math cal H } }_e$ of  all open  halfspac es 
 $u_\vartheta$_satisfies $$\label{eq:linearized-angle}
\left\{
_ \begin{aligned}
-\Delta u_\vartheta&= f'(u)u_\vartheta_&&\qquad \text{in_$\Omega$,}\\
u_\vartheta_& =_0_&&\qquad \text{on $\partial_\Omega$.}  _ 
  \end{aligned}
\right.$$_Suppose by contradiction_that_$u_\vartheta \not \equiv 0$. Then $u_\vartheta$ is a Dirichlet eigenfunction of $-\Delta- f'(u)$ corresponding_to_the eigenvalue_$0$._Moreover,_since $u$ is $2\pi$-periodic in_$\vartheta$, $u_\theta$ changes sign. This_implies that_the first Dirichlet eigenvalue of $-\Delta - f'(u)$_is_negative, which contradicts_our assumption that $m(u)=0$.

Hence is satisfied, and it also_holds true for an arbitrary rotation_$\tilde u$ of_the_function_$u$ since $\tilde u$_satisfies the same assumptions as $u$._Consequently, $u$ is a radial sign_changing solution of. However, then [@AftalionPacella Theorem_1.1] implies that $m(u) \ge N+1>0$,_which is a contradiction. We_thus conclude_that $m(u) \ge 1$ for_every nodal solution_$u$ of,_as claimed in_(ii).\
Next, let $u \in C^1_0(\Omega)$ be_a nodal solution_with $I(u)= c_{nod}$ (such a solution_exists_by Theorem \[thm:lensachieved\]). By_(ii)_and_Theorem \[prop:boundmorseindex\], we_have $m(u)=1$, so_(i)_follows by_Theorem \[sec:lens-mp\]._It also follows from Theorem \[sec:lens-mp\] that_$u$_is of mountain pass type. Moreover, by_[@AftalionPacella Theorem 1.1], $u$_is_nonradial.

Next we prove that_$u$ is foliated Schwarz symmetric._Let $x_0 \in \Omega \setminus \{0\}$_be chosen_such that_$u(x_0)=\max \{u(x)\::\: |x|=|x_0|\}$. We put $e:=\frac{x_0}{|x_0|}$, and we consider the family_${{\mathcal H}}_e$ of all open halfspaces