widehat \gamma}$)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Suppose first that $P_{\widehat \beta} = P_{\widehat \gamma}$. Since $w(\beta) = w(\gamma)$ is valid, assume $w(\beta) > w(\gamma)$. Prop. \[H3braidstdformprop\] shows that $p_{2,\,\widehat \beta} =0$ and $p_{0,\,\widehat \gamma} =0$, i.e. $\nabla_{\widehat \beta} = C_{w(\beta)-1}$ and $\nabla_{\widehat \gamma} = C_{w(\gamma)+1}$. Since $P_{\widehat \beta} = P_{\widehat \gamma}$, we have $C_{w(\beta)-1} = C_{w(\gamma)+1}$, i.e. $w(\beta) = w(\gamma)+2$ or $w(\beta) = -w(\gamma)$. These correspond to the second and third outcomes.

Conversely, when $\nabla_{\widehat \beta} = \nabla_{\widehat \gamma}$, the first condition implies $P_{\widehat \beta} = P_{\widehat \gamma}$ by Prop. \[Writhe3brPlusAny\]. Prop. \[H3braidstdformprop\] shows the remaining two cases also imply $P_{\widehat \beta} = P_{\widehat \gamma}$.

Proof of Proposition \[3brlandscape\] (3-Braid Degree Result)
-------------------------------------------------------------

It suffices to prove either $\deg p_0 \leq \deg p_1$, or $\deg p_2 \leq \deg p_1$, and to consider only the case in which $p_0$ and $p_2$ are both nonzero. By Prop. \[Homflycoeffprops\], the writhe may be assumed to be non-negative. Separate consideration of the cases $\nabla_{\beta} = 0$, $w=0$, $w=1$, $\deg \nabla_{\beta} > w$, $\deg \nabla_{\beta} = w$, $\deg \nabla_{\beta} = w-2$, and $\deg \nabla_{\beta} < w-2$ shows the result is true in all cases.

Proof of Lemma \[HJones3br\] ($V_{\widehat \beta} = V_{\widehat \gamma}$ properties for 3-braid links)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Observe that $V_{\widehat \beta}
widehat \gamma}$) 
 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

 Suppose first that $ P_{\widehat \beta } = P_{\widehat \gamma}$. Since $ w(\beta) = w(\gamma)$ is valid, assume $ w(\beta) > w(\gamma)$. Prop.   \[H3braidstdformprop\ ] shows that $ p_{2,\,\widehat \beta } = 0 $ and $ p_{0,\,\widehat \gamma } = 0 $, i.e. $ \nabla_{\widehat \beta } = C_{w(\beta)-1}$ and $ \nabla_{\widehat \gamma } = C_{w(\gamma)+1}$. Since $ P_{\widehat \beta } = P_{\widehat \gamma}$, we get $ C_{w(\beta)-1 } = C_{w(\gamma)+1}$, i.e. $ w(\beta) = w(\gamma)+2 $ or $ w(\beta) = -w(\gamma)$. These represent to the second and third outcomes. 

 Conversely, when $ \nabla_{\widehat \beta } = \nabla_{\widehat \gamma}$, the first condition imply $ P_{\widehat \beta } = P_{\widehat \gamma}$ by Prop.   \[Writhe3brPlusAny\ ]. Prop.   \[H3braidstdformprop\ ] shows the remaining two case also imply $ P_{\widehat \beta } = P_{\widehat \gamma}$. 

 Proof of Proposition \[3brlandscape\ ] (3 - Braid Degree Result) 
 ------------------------------------------------------------- 

 It suffices to prove either $ \deg p_0 \leq \deg p_1 $, or $ \deg p_2 \leq \deg p_1 $, and to consider entirely the case in which $ p_0 $ and $ p_2 $ are both nonzero. By Prop.   \[Homflycoeffprops\ ], the writhe may be assumed to be non - minus. freestanding consideration of the cases $ \nabla_{\beta } = 0 $, $ w=0 $, $ w=1 $, $ \deg \nabla_{\beta } > w$, $ \deg \nabla_{\beta } = w$, $ \deg \nabla_{\beta } = w-2 $, and $ \deg \nabla_{\beta } < w-2 $ shows the result is true in all font. 

 Proof of Lemma   \[HJones3br\ ] ($ V_{\widehat \beta } = V_{\widehat \gamma}$ properties for 3 - braid links) 
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 

 Observe that $ V_{\widehat \beta }
widfhat \gamma}$)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Suppose first uhat $P_{\widehat \betc} = P_{\widxhat \gajma}$. Sincd $w(\beta) = w(\gamma)$ is valid, assnme $q(\beta) > w(\gamma)$. Prop. \[H3braidstdwormprop\] dhows thqt $p_{2,\,\xidehat \beta} =0$ anv $p_{0,\,\widehat \gamjw} =0$, i.z. $\iabla_{\widehat \beja} = C_{w(\beta)-1}$ atd $\nabla_{\widehad \ealma} = C_{w(\gamma)+1}$. Since $P_{\widehat \beta} = P_{\ridehat \gwmma}$, we have $C_{r(\bets)-1} = C_{w(\famma)+1}$, i.e. $w(\beta) = w(\gamma)+2$ or $w(\beta) = -w(\famma)$. Tiese correspond to the second and third oktcoles.

Conversely, when $\nabla_{\widehqt \bqra} = \nabla_{\widdhat \gamma}$, the first ckndition implies $P_{\widehat \beta} = P_{\widzhat \gamma}$ vy Prlk. \[Writhe3brPluwAny\]. Irop. \[H3braidstdnprmpro[\] shows the remaining twm cqses also imply $P_{\wideiat \beta} = P_{\widehat \gwmma}$.

Proof oy Proposition \[3brlandsxape\] (3-Brdid Gegrdw Rdsumt)
-------------------------------------------------------------

Mt aufficfs vo prove eifher $\deg p_0 \oeq \deg p_1$, or $\deg p_2 \kez \deg p_1$, and to consiqew only the case in which $p_0$ and $p_2$ are bouh nohzero. By Prop. \[Homflycoefdprops\], the writhe may be assumqd to be non-negative. Separate consideration of tha casxs $\nayoa_{\betx} = 0$, $w=0$, $w=1$, $\deg \nabla_{\beta} > w$, $\deg \nabla_{\beta} = w$, $\deg \nafma_{\nena} = w-2$, and $\deg \nabja_{\beta} < w-2$ snoas jhe result is jrue in alm cases.

Proof of Lelma \[HJongs3br\] ($V_{\qidehat \btta} = F_{\widehat \gamma}$ properties fir 3-braid linhw)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Observe that $V_{\widzhat \beta}
widehat \gamma}$) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Suppose first that $P_{\widehat P_{\widehat Since $w(\beta) w(\gamma)$ is valid, \[H3braidstdformprop\] that $p_{2,\,\widehat \beta} and $p_{0,\,\widehat \gamma} i.e. $\nabla_{\widehat \beta} = C_{w(\beta)-1}$ and \gamma} = C_{w(\gamma)+1}$. Since $P_{\widehat \beta} = P_{\widehat \gamma}$, we have $C_{w(\beta)-1} = i.e. $w(\beta) = w(\gamma)+2$ or $w(\beta) = -w(\gamma)$. These correspond to the second third Conversely, $\nabla_{\widehat = \nabla_{\widehat \gamma}$, the first condition implies $P_{\widehat \beta} = P_{\widehat \gamma}$ by Prop. \[Writhe3brPlusAny\]. Prop. shows the remaining two cases also imply $P_{\widehat = P_{\widehat \gamma}$. Proof Proposition \[3brlandscape\] (3-Braid Degree Result) It to prove $\deg \leq p_1$, or $\deg \leq \deg p_1$, and to consider only the case in which $p_0$ and $p_2$ are both nonzero. Prop. \[Homflycoeffprops\], may be to non-negative. consideration of the = 0$, $w=0$, $w=1$, $\deg \nabla_{\beta} \nabla_{\beta} = w$, $\deg \nabla_{\beta} = w-2$, and \nabla_{\beta} < shows the result is true in cases. Proof of Lemma \[HJones3br\] ($V_{\widehat \beta} = \gamma}$ properties for 3-braid links) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Observe that $V_{\widehat \beta}
widehat \gamma}$)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Suppose first tHat $P_{\widehaT \beta} = p_{\wiDehAt \GammA}$. SinCe $w(\beta) = w(\gamma)$ iS ValiD, assume $w(\beta) > w(\gamma)$. Prop. \[h3braiDsTDforMPrOp\] shoWs that $p_{2,\,\WIdEHAt \bEtA} =0$ aNd $p_{0,\,\WiDEhAt \gamMa} =0$, i.E. $\nabla_{\wIdehat \beta} = c_{w(\bEtA)-1}$ and $\nabla_{\widEHaT \gamma} = C_{w(\gaMma)+1}$. since $P_{\widehaT \beTa} = P_{\widEhAt \gAMma}$, we HavE $C_{w(\beTa)-1} = C_{w(\gaMMa)+1}$, i.e. $w(\bEta) = w(\gamma)+2$ Or $W(\Beta) = -w(\gAMma)$. ThesE COrRespOnd to the second and THiRD outcomes.

ConveRsely, wHeN $\NaBLA_{\wiDehAt \beta} = \nablA_{\wIdehaT \Gamma}$, thE FiRST ConDItion implies $P_{\Widehat \beta} = p_{\WidEhat \gaMmA}$ by pRop. \[WriThe3brplUSAnY\]. Prop. \[H3braidStdfOrmprop\] shOws the REmaininG Two caseS also iMplY $P_{\wIdehAT \bEtA} = P_{\wIdEHat \GAmMa}$.

PROof Of ProposItIoN \[3brlaNdscAPE\] (3-bRaid degRee REsult)
-------------------------------------------------------------

it suffices to pRovE eitHEr $\dEg p_0 \leQ \deg p_1$, Or $\deG p_2 \Leq \deG p_1$, and tO consIdEr only the case in WhicH $p_0$ and $p_2$ are BotH nOnzErO. By PrOP. \[HomflYcoEffProps\], thE writhe MAy bE aSSUMeD to be non-negative. SePaRATe ConsiderAtion oF ThE cASes $\nabla_{\BeTa} = 0$, $w=0$, $W=1$, $\deg \NABla_{\beTa} > w$, $\dEG \nAbla_{\beta} = W$, $\deg \naBLa_{\BeTa} = w-2$, and $\dEg \Nabla_{\bEtA} < w-2$ sHowS the rESult Is true In all casEs.

ProOF of Lemma \[HJones3BR\] ($V_{\widehat \beta} = v_{\WiDEHaT \GammA}$ prOperties for 3-BraiD LinkS)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ObsERvE thAT $V_{\widEhat \bEtA}
widehat \gamma}$)
-------- ---------- ----- --- --- -- ---- ---- -------------- - ---- ---------------------- ----- -- - ---- - -- ----- -

Supp o se f irs tth at$P _ {\ wideh at\beta}= P_{\wide hat  \ gamma}$. Sin c e$w(\beta)= w (\gamma)$ is  va lid, a ss ume $w(\b eta ) > w (\gamm a )$. Pr op. \[H3b ra i dstdfo r mprop\] s ho ws t hat $p_{2,\,\wide h at \beta} =0$ and  $p_{0 ,\ , \w i d eha t \ gamma} =0$ ,i.e.$ \nabla_ { \w i d e hat \beta} = C_{w (\beta)-1}$ and  $\nab la _{\ w idehat  \gam ma }  =C_{w(\gamma )+1} $. Since$P_{\w i dehat \ b eta} =P_{\wi deh at\gam m a} $,  we  h a ve$ C_ {w( \ bet a)-1} =C_ {w (\gam ma)+ 1 } $ ,  i.e . $ w(\b eta)= w(\gamma)+2 $ o r $w ( \be ta) =  -w(\ gamm a) $. Th ese co rresp on d to the second  and  third ou tco me s.
C onver s ely, w hen  $\ nabla_{ \wideha t  \b et a } =\nabla_{\widehat \ ga m m a} $, the f irst c o nd it i on impli es  $P _{\w i d ehat\bet a }= P_{\wi dehat\ ga mm a}$ byPr op. \[ Wr ith e3b rPlus A ny\] . Prop . \[H3br aidst d formprop\] sho w s the remaini n gt w oc ases  al so imply $P _{\w i deha t \b e ta } = P_{\w ideha t\ ga m ma}$.

Proof of Pro po sition  \[3b rlandscape\](3-Braid D e g r ee Resul t)
- - -- - -------------- ----- ---------- - -------- ----- -------- -----

It s ufficestopro veeit h e r$\deg p_0 \le q \deg  p _1$, or  $\ deg p_2  \l eq\de g p _1 $, and to  conside ron ly  t hecasei n which$p _0$  a nd$p_2$ are bo th no nzer o.  B y  Pr op. \[H o mf l y coef fp ro ps\] , t he  writ he m a y b e assum ed to benon - nega ti ve . Separ ate considera ti on of theca ses  $\nab l a _{\beta}  = 0$, $w=0$, $w=1$, $\ d eg \nab la_ {\bet a} >  w$, $\de g \ nabla_ {\b e ta} =w$, $\ deg \ na bla _ { \beta } =w-2 $,  and $\deg \ nab la_{\ be ta}< w-2$shows the result i s  tr ue in all cas es. 

Pr o o fofL em m a \ [H J one s 3 br\] ($V_{\wide hat \beta}  = V_ {\widehat\ gam ma }$ prop ertiesfor 3 - braid l inks)
--- --------- -- ---- - - --- ---------- -------- --------- - ----- - -- ----- --- ------ -- --- ----- ------ - --- ----- ----
Ob servethat$V _{\wideh at \beta}
widehat \gamma}$)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Suppose_first that_$P_{\widehat \beta} = P_{\widehat_\gamma}$. Since_$w(\beta)_= w(\gamma)$_is_valid, assume $w(\beta)_> w(\gamma)$. Prop. \[H3braidstdformprop\]_shows that $p_{2,\,\widehat \beta}_=0$ and $p_{0,\,\widehat_\gamma}_=0$, i.e. $\nabla_{\widehat \beta} = C_{w(\beta)-1}$ and $\nabla_{\widehat \gamma} = C_{w(\gamma)+1}$. Since $P_{\widehat \beta}_=_P_{\widehat \gamma}$,_we_have_$C_{w(\beta)-1} = C_{w(\gamma)+1}$, i.e. $w(\beta)_= w(\gamma)+2$ or $w(\beta) =_-w(\gamma)$. These_correspond to the second and third outcomes.

Conversely, when_$\nabla_{\widehat_\beta} = \nabla_{\widehat_\gamma}$, the first condition implies $P_{\widehat \beta} = P_{\widehat_\gamma}$ by Prop. \[Writhe3brPlusAny\]. Prop. \[H3braidstdformprop\] shows the_remaining two cases_also_imply_$P_{\widehat \beta} = P_{\widehat_\gamma}$.

Proof of Proposition \[3brlandscape\] (3-Braid Degree_Result)
-------------------------------------------------------------

It suffices to prove either $\deg_p_0 \leq \deg p_1$, or $\deg p_2_\leq \deg p_1$, and to consider_only the case in which_$p_0$ and_$p_2$ are both nonzero. By_Prop. \[Homflycoeffprops\], the writhe_may be_assumed to be_non-negative. Separate consideration of the cases_$\nabla_{\beta} = 0$,_$w=0$, $w=1$, $\deg \nabla_{\beta} > w$,_$\deg_\nabla_{\beta} = w$,_$\deg_\nabla_{\beta}_= w-2$,_and $\deg \nabla_{\beta}_<_w-2$ shows_the_result is true in all cases.

Proof_of_Lemma \[HJones3br\] ($V_{\widehat \beta} = V_{\widehat \gamma}$ properties_for 3-braid links)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Observe that_$V_{\widehat_\beta}