 \hat{k} = \hat{m} \; \mbox{or} \; \hat k \leftrightarrow
\kappa_1, \kappa_2 \leq \alpha \; \mbox{and} \; \hat m \leftrightarrow
\mu_1, \mu_2 \leq \alpha, \\ [2ex]

\langle \hat{k} |D (\alpha)| \hat{m} \rangle = \langle \hat{k} |D (2)|
\hat{m} \rangle, \; \kappa_1 > \alpha\; \mbox{or} \;\kappa_2 > \alpha \; \\
\phantom{\langle \hat{k} |D (\alpha)| \hat{m} \rangle = \langle
\hat{k} |D (2)| \hat{m} \rangle, \mbox{if} \hat{k} \not= \hat{m}}
\quad \mbox{or} \;\mu_1 > \alpha \; \mbox{or} \; \mu_2 > \alpha.
\end{array}$$ These properties have the following consequence.\
[**Proposition 5.1:**]{} The sequence $(D (\alpha) : \alpha \in
\mathbb{N}, \alpha \geq 2) $ converges strongly to $0$.\
[**Proof.**]{} Let the projections $F_\alpha$ and $F'_\alpha$ be defined by $$\label{5.3} \displaystyle{F_\alpha =
\sum^\infty_{\kappa_1, \kappa_2 > \alpha } \Psi^-_{\kappa_1 \kappa_2}
\langle \Psi^-_{\kappa_1, \kappa_2}, \;\cdot\; \rangle }$$ and $F'_\alpha = 1 - F_\alpha$. Then $F_\alpha$ converges strongly to $0$, if $\alpha \rightarrow \infty$, and $F'_\alpha$ to $1$. By a simple calculation using Formula (\[5.2\]) one verifies that for each $f \in {\mathcal{H}}^2_-$: $$\label{5.4}
\begin{array}{ll} F_{\alpha} D (\alpha)f = F_\alpha D (2) f, \\ [3ex]
F'_\alpha D (\alpha)f = F'_\alpha D (2) F_\alpha f.
\end{array
\hat{k } = \hat{m } \; \mbox{or } \; \hat k \leftrightarrow 
 \kappa_1, \kappa_2 \leq \alpha \; \mbox{and } \; \hat m \leftrightarrow 
 \mu_1, \mu_2 \leq \alpha, \\ [ 2ex ] 

 \langle \hat{k } |D (\alpha)| \hat{m } \rangle = \langle \hat{k } |D (2)| 
 \hat{m } \rangle, \; \kappa_1 > \alpha\; \mbox{or } \;\kappa_2 > \alpha \; \\ 
 \phantom{\langle \hat{k } |D (\alpha)| \hat{m } \rangle = \langle 
 \hat{k } |D (2)| \hat{m } \rangle, \mbox{if } \hat{k } \not= \hat{m } } 
 \quad \mbox{or } \;\mu_1 > \alpha \; \mbox{or } \; \mu_2 > \alpha. 
 \end{array}$$ These properties have the following consequence.\ 
 [ * * suggestion 5.1 :* * ] { } The succession $ (D (\alpha): \alpha \in 
 \mathbb{N }, \alpha \geq 2) $ converges strongly to $ 0$.\ 
 [ * * validation. * * ] { } Let the projection $ F_\alpha$ and $ F'_\alpha$ be defined by $ $ \label{5.3 } \displaystyle{F_\alpha = 
 \sum^\infty_{\kappa_1, \kappa_2 > \alpha } \Psi^-_{\kappa_1 \kappa_2 } 
 \langle \Psi^-_{\kappa_1, \kappa_2 }, \;\cdot\; \rangle } $ $ and $ F'_\alpha = 1 - F_\alpha$. Then $ F_\alpha$ converges strongly to $ 0 $, if $ \alpha \rightarrow \infty$, and $ F'_\alpha$ to $ 1$. By a elementary calculation using Formula (\[5.2\ ]) one verifies that for each $ f \in { \mathcal{H}}^2_-$: $ $ \label{5.4 } 
 \begin{array}{ll } F_{\alpha } D (\alpha)f = F_\alpha D (2) f, \\ [ 3ex ] 
 F'_\alpha vitamin d (\alpha)f = F'_\alpha D (2) F_\alpha f. 
 \end{array
 \hah{k} = \hat{m} \; \mbox{or} \; \hat k \ueftrightarrow
\kcppa_1, \ka'pa_2 \leq \alpha \; \obox{and} \; \hat m \leftrightarrox
\mu_1, \nu_2 \lew \alpha, \\ [2ex]

\langle \hat{k} |D (\alpha)| \jat{m} \rantle = \oangle \hat{k} |D (2)|
\hat{m} \rangls, \; \ka'pe_1 > \alpha\; \mbox{or} \;\kappa_2 > \al[ha \; \\
\phantom{\latgue \hat{k} |D (\alpha)| \hat{m} \rangle = \langle
\hae{k} |D (2)| \hst{l} \rangle, \mbox{is} \hau{k} \got= \gat{m}}
\quad \mbox{or} \;\mu_1 > \alpha \; \mbox{or} \; \mu_2 > \alkha.
\end{array}$$ These lroperties have the followlng fonsequence.\
[**Proposihion 5.1:**]{} The sgsuegxe $(D (\alpha) : \xlpha \in
\mauhyb{N}, \alpha \ggq 2) $ converges strongly to $0$.\
[**Proof.**]{} Let che projectuobs $V_\dlpha$ and $F'_\elpha$ fe defined bn $$\label{5.3} \displaustyle{F_\alpha =
\smm^\infvy_{\kappa_1, \kappa_2 > \alpha } \Psi^-_{\nappa_1 \kappa_2}
\langle \Ksi^-_{\kappa_1, \kdp'a_2}, \;\cdot\; \rangle }$$ and $F'_\qlpha = 1 - F_\anpha$. Rhev $F_\zl'ha$ conveggea strongly to $0$, if $\alpya \rightarrow \infty$, age $F'_\alpha$ to $1$. Gy a sym[le calculation using Formula (\[5.2\]) one verixiea that for each $f \in {\marhcal{H}}^2_-$: $$\label{5.4}
\begin{arrai}{ll} F_{\alpha} D (\alpha)f = F_\alpha D (2) f, \\ [3ex]
F'_\alpha D (\alpha)f = F'_\alpha D (2) F_\eloha f.
\cnd{afeaj
\hat{k} = \hat{m} \; \mbox{or} \; \hat \kappa_1, \leq \alpha \mbox{and} \; \hat \alpha, [2ex] \langle \hat{k} (\alpha)| \hat{m} \rangle \langle \hat{k} |D (2)| \hat{m} \rangle, \kappa_1 > \alpha\; \mbox{or} \;\kappa_2 > \alpha \; \\ \phantom{\langle \hat{k} |D (\alpha)| \rangle = \langle \hat{k} |D (2)| \hat{m} \rangle, \mbox{if} \hat{k} \not= \hat{m}} \quad \;\mu_1 \alpha \mbox{or} \mu_2 > \alpha. \end{array}$$ These properties have the following consequence.\ [**Proposition 5.1:**]{} The sequence $(D (\alpha) \alpha \in \mathbb{N}, \alpha \geq 2) $ converges to $0$.\ [**Proof.**]{} Let projections $F_\alpha$ and $F'_\alpha$ be by \displaystyle{F_\alpha = \kappa_2 \alpha \Psi^-_{\kappa_1 \kappa_2} \langle \kappa_2}, \;\cdot\; \rangle }$$ and $F'_\alpha = 1 - F_\alpha$. Then $F_\alpha$ converges strongly to $0$, if \rightarrow \infty$, to $1$. a calculation Formula (\[5.2\]) one for each $f \in {\mathcal{H}}^2_-$: $$\label{5.4} (\alpha)f = F_\alpha D (2) f, \\ [3ex] D (\alpha)f F'_\alpha D (2) F_\alpha f. \end{array
 \hat{k} = \hat{m} \; \mbox{or} \; \hat k \leftrigHtarrow
\kapPa_1, \kapPa_2 \lEq \aLpHa \; \mbOx{anD} \; \hat m \leftrightARrow
\Mu_1, \mu_2 \leq \alpha, \\ [2ex]

\langle \haT{k} |D (\alPhA)| \Hat{m} \RAnGle = \laNgle \hat{K} |d (2)|
\hAT{M} \raNgLe, \; \KapPa_1 > \ALpHa\; \mboX{or} \;\Kappa_2 > \alPha \; \\
\phantom{\LanGlE \hat{k} |D (\alpha)| \hAT{m} \Rangle = \langLe
\hAt{k} |D (2)| \hat{m} \rangLe, \mBox{if} \hAt{K} \noT= \Hat{m}}
\qUad \Mbox{oR} \;\mu_1 > \alpHA \; \mbox{oR} \; \mu_2 > \alpha.
\eNd{ARray}$$ ThESe propeRTIeS havE the following consEQuENce.\
[**Proposition 5.1:**]{} the seqUeNCe $(d (\ALphA) : \alPha \in
\mathbB{N}, \Alpha \GEq 2) $ conveRGeS STRonGLy to $0$.\
[**Proof.**]{} Let tHe projectioNS $F_\aLpha$ anD $F'_\AlpHA$ be defIned bY $$\lABel{5.3} \DisplaystylE{F_\alPha =
\sum^\infTy_{\kappA_1, \Kappa_2 > \alPHa } \Psi^-_{\kaPpa_1 \kapPa_2}
\lAngLe \PsI^-_{\KaPpA_1, \kaPpA_2}, \;\CdoT\; \RaNglE }$$ And $f'_\alpha = 1 - F_\aLpHa$. then $F_\AlphA$ CONVergEs sTronGly to $0$, If $\alpha \rightaRroW \infTY$, anD $F'_\alpHa$ to $1$. BY a siMpLe calCulatiOn usiNg formula (\[5.2\]) one verifIes tHat for eacH $f \iN {\mAthCaL{H}}^2_-$: $$\labEL{5.4}
\begin{ArrAy}{lL} F_{\alpha} d (\alpha)f = f_\AlpHa d (2) F, \\ [3EX]
F'_\Alpha D (\alpha)f = F'_\alpha d (2) F_\ALPhA f.
\end{arrAy
 \hat{k} = \hat{m} \; \mbo x{or} \; \ hat k  \l eft ri ghta rrow 
\kappa_1, \ka p pa_2  \leq \alpha \; \mbox{ and}\; \hat m\left rightar r ow \ mu_ 1,  \ mu_ 2\ le q \al pha , \\ [2 ex]

\lang le\h at{k} |D (\a l ph a)| \hat{m } \ rangle = \la ngl e \hat {k } | D  (2)| 
\h at{m}  \rang l e, \;\kappa_1>\ alpha\ ;  \mbox{ o r }\;\k appa_2 > \alpha \ ;  \ \ 
\phantom{\lan gle \h at { k} | D ( \al pha)| \hat {m } \ra n gle = \ l an g l e 
\h a t{k} |D (2)|\hat{m} \ra n gle , \mbo x{ if} \hat{k } \no t= \ha t{m}}
\quad  \mb ox{or} \; \mu_1>  \alpha \; \mbo x{or}\;\mu _2 > \a lp ha. 
\ e nd{ a rr ay} $ $ T hese pro pe rt ies h avet h e foll owi ng c onseq uence.\
[**Pr opo siti o n 5 .1:** ]{} T he s eq uence  $(D ( \alph a)  : \alpha \in
\ math bb{N}, \a lph a\ge q2) $c onverg esstr ongly t o $0$.\ [** Pr o o f .* *]{} Let the proje ct i o ns  $F_\alp ha$ an d  $ F' _ \alpha$be  de fine d by $$ \lab e l{ 5.3} \di splays t yl e{ F_\alph a=
\sum ^\ inf ty_ {\kap p a_1,  \kapp a_2 > \a lpha}  \Psi^-_{\kapp a _1 \kappa_2}\ la n g le \Psi ^-_ {\kappa_1,\kap p a_2} , \; \ cd ot\ ;  \ran gle } $$ an d  $F'_\alpha = 1 - F _\ alpha$ . The n $F_\alpha$convergess t r ongly to  $0$ ,  i f  $\alpha \righ tarro w \infty$, and $F'_ \alph a$ to $1 $. By a s i m ple calc ula tio n u sin g Fo rmula (\[5.2\ ] )  one  v erifies  th at foreac h $ f \ in{\ mathcal{H }}^2_-$:  $ $\ la be l{5 .4}
\ b egin{arr ay }{l l}  F_ {\alp h a} D ( \alph a)f=F_ \ alp ha D (2 )  f , \\ [ 3e x] 
F'_ \al ph a D ( \alp h a)f  = F'_\ alpha D ( 2)F _\al ph af.
\end {array
 \hat{k}_= \hat{m}_\; \mbox{or} \; \hat_k \leftrightarrow
\kappa_1,_\kappa_2_\leq \alpha_\;_\mbox{and} \; \hat_m \leftrightarrow
\mu_1, \mu_2_\leq \alpha, \\ [2ex]

\langle_\hat{k} |D (\alpha)|_\hat{m}_\rangle = \langle \hat{k} |D (2)|
\hat{m} \rangle, \; \kappa_1 > \alpha\; \mbox{or} \;\kappa_2 >_\alpha_\; \\
\phantom{\langle_\hat{k}_|D_(\alpha)| \hat{m} \rangle = \langle
\hat{k}_|D (2)| \hat{m} \rangle, \mbox{if}_\hat{k} \not=_\hat{m}}
\quad \mbox{or} \;\mu_1 > \alpha \; \mbox{or} \;_\mu_2_> \alpha.
\end{array}$$ These_properties have the following consequence.\
[**Proposition 5.1:**]{} The sequence $(D_(\alpha) : \alpha \in
\mathbb{N}, \alpha \geq_2) $ converges_strongly_to_$0$.\
[**Proof.**]{} Let the projections_$F_\alpha$ and $F'_\alpha$ be defined by_$$\label{5.3} \displaystyle{F_\alpha =
\sum^\infty_{\kappa_1, \kappa_2 > \alpha_} \Psi^-_{\kappa_1 \kappa_2}
\langle \Psi^-_{\kappa_1, \kappa_2}, \;\cdot\; \rangle_}$$ and $F'_\alpha = 1 -_F_\alpha$. Then $F_\alpha$ converges strongly_to $0$,_if $\alpha \rightarrow \infty$, and_$F'_\alpha$ to $1$._By a_simple calculation using_Formula (\[5.2\]) one verifies that for_each $f \in_{\mathcal{H}}^2_-$: $$\label{5.4}
\begin{array}{ll} F_{\alpha} D (\alpha)f =_F_\alpha_D (2) f,_\\_[3ex]
F'_\alpha_D (\alpha)f_= F'_\alpha D_(2)_F_\alpha f.
\end{array