 open-string model in [@cudell].

As seen from the above discussion, an accurate determination of the ratio $T_h/T_c$ is of great phenomenological interest. However, such a study is not the main purpose of the present paper, where we aim at giving reliable predictions for the equation of state of YM theory with an arbitrary gauge algebra. As observed in [@meyer], typical values $T_h\approx T_c$ give very good results in fitting the lattice data. Setting $T_c=T_h$, as we will do in the rest of this work, means that the deconfinement temperature may be identified with the maximal allowed temperature for the confined hadronic phase. This assumption has two advantages. First, it will reproduce accurately the latest $\mathfrak{su}(3)$ lattice data of [@borsa] (see next section), and it is not in strong disagreement with current $\mathfrak{su}(N)$ results, where $T_h/T_c$ is at most around $10 \%$ [@TcTh0; @TcTh]. Second, it is applicable to any gauge algebra without having to guess a value for $T_h/T_c$, that cannot be fitted on lattice results since no equation of state is available for gauge algebras different than $\mathfrak{su}(N)$ so far. The drawback of this choice is that it forbids any discussion about a superheated hadronic phase in generic YM theories. Such a refinement of the model will rather be the topic of a separate study.

For completeness, we notice that the somewhat surprising value $T_h=2.8\, T_c\gg T_c$ has been found in [@Megias] by using a Hagedorn picture too. The difference with our approach comes from the fact that, in  [@Megias], $T_h$ is fitted by assuming that the low-lying glueballs currently known from lattice simulations should exhibit a Hagedorn-type spectrum. On the contrary, we think here that the Hagedorn-like behavior only appears in the high-lying sector, that mostly concerns the glueballs that are not known so far by lattice calculations, see Eq. (\[preh\]).

Numerical results
-----------------

According to standard $\mathfrak{su}(3)$ studies, it is relevant to set $\sigma_0\approx(9/4)\ 0.2$
open - string model in [ @cudell ]. 

 As seen from the above discussion, an accurate decision of the proportion $ T_h / T_c$ is of great phenomenological interest. However, such a discipline is not the independent purpose of the present paper, where we draw a bead on at impart reliable prediction for the equation of state of YM hypothesis with an arbitrary gauge algebra. As observed in   [ @meyer ], typical values $ T_h\approx T_c$ pass very good results in fitting the lattice data. dress $ T_c = T_h$, as we will do in the rest of this work, intend that the deconfinement temperature may be identified with the maximal allowed temperature for the confined hadronic phase. This assumption have two advantages. First, it will reproduce accurately the latest $ \mathfrak{su}(3)$ lattice datum of   [ @borsa ] (see next section), and it is not in strong disagreement with current $ \mathfrak{su}(N)$ results, where $ T_h / T_c$ is at about around $ 10 \%$   [ @TcTh0; @TcTh ]. Second, it is applicable to any bore algebra without hold to guess a value for $ T_h / T_c$, that cannot be fitted on lattice results since no equation of state is available for gauge algebras unlike than $ \mathfrak{su}(N)$ thus far. The drawback of this choice is that it prevent any discussion about a superheated hadronic phase in generic YM theory. Such a refinement of the model will rather be the subject of a separate survey. 

 For completeness, we notice that the somewhat surprising value $ T_h=2.8\, T_c\gg T_c$ has been detect in   [ @Megias ] by using a Hagedorn picture too. The difference with our approach path comes from the fact that, in   [ @Megias ], $ T_h$ is fitted by assuming that the low - lying glueballs presently known from wicket simulations should exhibit a Hagedorn - type spectrum. On the contrary, we think here that the Hagedorn - like demeanor only appears in the high - lying sector, that mostly concerns the glueballs that are not known so far by lattice calculations, experience Eq.   (\[preh\ ]). 

 Numerical results 
 ----------------- 

 accord to standard $ \mathfrak{su}(3)$ studies, it is relevant to set $ \sigma_0\approx(9/4)\ 0.2 $
 opfn-string model in [@cudell].

Xs seen from thg qbove viscussjon, an azcurate determination of the rqtio $U_k/T_c$ is of great phenumenologibal interwst. Iowever, such a svhdy is kjt tgc maiu 'urpose of the kresent papes, where we aim ag yiving reliable predictions for the qquatiom lf state of YM thepwy wjnh an arbitrary gauge algebra. Aa obserned in [@meyer], typicsl values $T_h\approx T_c$ give verj good results in vitting the lateuce data. Setging $T_c=T_h$, as we will dk in the rest of this work, meanr thac the decondibemftt temperatnre maj be identificc with the macimal allowed bempecatuee for the confined hedronic phase. This afsumption hcs two advantages. Firwt, it whll seprueucd adcnrafely tje matest $\matgfrak{su}(3)$ latrice data of [@borsa] (ste gvct section), ahd it ys not in strong disagreement with currenu $\matgfrak{su}(N)$ results, where $R_h/T_c$ is at most arounf $10 \%$ [@TcTh0; @TsTh]. Second, it is applicable to any gauge algebra fithont harlkg tu gkess a value for $T_h/T_c$, that cannot be fitted og lstnice results sincc no equation of syahe ys available wor gabfe algebras differenh than $\iathfeak{su}(N)$ so far. The drawback of this choicw is that it dorbids any discusdion about c supetheatec hadronic phase in genzric YJ theories. Duch a rerknement of the mudek fill rather be the topic os a separete scudy.

For zompketenefs, we notife that the somewhat surorisiug vanue $T_h=2.8\, T_c\gh T_c$ has been found in [@Megias] by using a Hagedprt ppcture toj. The difference wyth our approaeh comes from the fact nhat, in  [@Mxgias], $T_h$ is sitted by assgling that thx low-lyind glyebaols curfdntly known frpm latticv fimuoations should exhlbit x Hagedorn-type s'tcttym. On the conttarh, wq nhiik hewa that the Hdgedurn-uoke bdhavior onln aopeats in the high-lying vectkr, that mostly convevns the goueballs that are not known so far by lwtticx calcnlatioms, fee Eq. (\[preh\]).

Numerical results
-----------------

Acckrding to stwndard $\mathfwak{sm}(3)$ stodies, it is relevant to set $\sigma_0\approx(9/4)\ 0.2$
open-string model in [@cudell]. As seen from discussion, accurate determination the ratio $T_h/T_c$ However, a study is the main purpose the present paper, where we aim giving reliable predictions for the equation of state of YM theory with an gauge algebra. As observed in [@meyer], typical values $T_h\approx T_c$ give very good in the data. $T_c=T_h$, as we will do in the rest of this work, means that the deconfinement temperature be identified with the maximal allowed temperature for confined hadronic phase. This has two advantages. First, it reproduce the latest lattice of (see next section), it is not in strong disagreement with current $\mathfrak{su}(N)$ results, where $T_h/T_c$ is at most around $10 [@TcTh0; @TcTh]. is applicable any algebra having to guess for $T_h/T_c$, that cannot be fitted since no equation of state is available for algebras different $\mathfrak{su}(N)$ so far. The drawback of choice is that it forbids any discussion about superheated hadronic phase in generic YM theories. Such a refinement of the model will rather topic of a separate For completeness, we that somewhat value T_c\gg T_c$ been found in [@Megias] by using a Hagedorn picture too. The with our approach comes from the fact that, in [@Megias], fitted assuming that the glueballs currently known from simulations exhibit a Hagedorn-type spectrum. contrary, think Hagedorn-like only in the high-lying sector, mostly concerns the glueballs that not known so far (\[preh\]). Numerical results ----------------- According to standard $\mathfrak{su}(3)$ it is relevant to set $\sigma_0\approx(9/4)\ 0.2$
 open-string model in [@cudell].

As Seen from thE abovE diScuSsIon, aN accUrate determinaTIon oF the ratio $T_h/T_c$ is of great PhenoMeNOlogICaL inteRest. HowEVeR, SUch A sTuDy iS nOT tHe maiN puRpose of The present PapEr, Where we aim at GIvIng reliablE prEdictions for The EquatiOn Of sTAte of yM tHeory With an ARbitraRy gauge alGeBRa. As obSErved in [@MEYeR], typIcal values $T_h\approX t_c$ GIve very good resUlts in FiTTiNG The LatTice data. SeTtIng $T_c=t_H$, as we wiLL dO IN The REst of this work, Means that thE DecOnfineMeNt tEMperatUre maY bE IdeNtified with The mAximal allOwed teMPeraturE For the cOnfineD haDroNic pHAsE. THis AsSUmpTIoN haS Two AdvantagEs. fiRst, it Will REPROducE acCuraTely tHe latest $\mathfRak{Su}(3)$ laTTicE data Of [@borSa] (seE nExt seCtion), aNd it iS nOt in strong disagReemEnt with cuRreNt $\MatHfRak{su}(n)$ ResultS, whEre $t_h/T_c$ is aT most arOUnd $10 \%$ [@tctH0; @tCTH]. Second, it is applicaBlE TO aNy gauge aLgebra WItHoUT having tO gUesS a vaLUE for $T_H/T_c$, tHAt Cannot be Fitted ON lAtTice resUlTs sincE nO eqUatIon of STate Is avaiLable for Gauge ALgebras differeNT than $\mathfrak{SU}(N)$ SO FaR. the dRawBack of this cHoicE Is thAt it FOrBidS Any diScussIoN AbOUt a superheated hadroNiC phase In genEric YM theorieS. Such a refiNEMEnt of the ModeL WiLL rather be the toPic of A separate sTUdy.

For coMpletEness, we nOtice that THE somewhaT suRprIsiNg vALUe $t_h=2.8\, T_c\gg T_c$ has beEN FounD iN [@Megias] By uSing a HaGedOrn PicTurE tOo. The diffErence wiTh OuR aPpRoaCh comES from the FaCt tHaT, in  [@megiaS], $t_h$ is fiTted bY assUmInG ThaT the low-LYiNG GlueBaLlS curRenTlY knowN froM LatTice simUlations sHouLD exhIbIt A HagedoRn-type spectruM. ON the contraRy, We tHink heRE That the HAgedorn-like behavior only APpears iN thE high-LyinG sector, thAt mOstly cOncERns the GluebaLls thAt Are NOT knowN SO fAr bY lAttice calcULAtiOns, seE EQ. (\[preH\]).

NumeriCal results
-----------------

AccordinG To sTandard $\mathfrAk{sU}(3)$ stuDIEs, It iS ReLEvaNt TO seT $\SIgma_0\approx(9/4)\ 0.2$
 open-string model in [@cu dell].

As  seen  fr omth e ab ovediscussion, an accu rate determination ofthe r at i o $T _ h/ T_c$is of g r ea t phe no me nol og i ca l int ere st. How ever, such  ast udy is not t h emain purpo seof the prese ntpaper,  w her e  we a imat gi ving r e liable  predicti on s  for t h e equat i o nof s tate of YM theory wi t h an arbitrary  gauge  a l ge b r a.Asobserved i n[@mey e r], typ i ca l v alu e s $T_h\approx  T_c$ givev ery  goodre sul t s in f ittin gt helattice dat a. S etting $T _c=T_h $ , as we will do  in th e r est  oft hi swor k, mea n stha t  th e deconf in em ent t empe r a t u re m aybe i denti fied with the  ma xima l  al lowed  temp erat ur e for  the c onfin ed  hadronic phase . Th is assump tio nhas  t wo ad v antage s.Fir st, itwill re p rod uc e a cc urately the latest  $ \ m at hfrak{su }(3)$l at ti c e data o f[@b orsa ] (seenext se ction),and it is  n ot in s tr ong di sa gre eme nt wi t h cu rrent$\mathfr ak{su } (N)$ results,w here $T_h/T_c $  i s at most  ar ound $10 \% $ [@ T cTh0 ; @T c Th ].S econd , itis ap p licable to any gaug ealgebr a wit hout having t o guess av a l ue for $ T_h/ T _c $ , that cannotbe fi tted on la t tice res ultssince no  equation o f stateisava ila ble f or  gauge algebr a s  dif fe rent th an$\mathf rak {su }(N )$so  far. The  drawbac kof  t hi s c hoice is thatit  fo rb ids  anyd iscuss ion a bout  a  s u per heatedh ad r o nicph as e in  ge ne ric Y M th e ori es. Suc h a refin eme n t of  t he  modelwill rather b ethe topicof  asepara t e  study.
For completeness, we n o tice th atthe s omew hat surpr isi ng val ue$ T_h=2. 8\, T_ c\ggT_ c$h a s bee n fo und  i n [@Megias ] byusing  a  Hag edorn p icture too. The di f fer ence with our  ap proa c h  c ome s  f r omth e  fa c t  that, in  [@Me gias], $T_ h$ is  fitted by ass um ing tha t the l ow-ly i ng glue balls cur rently kn ow n fr o m  la ttice simu lationsshould ex h ibita  H agedo rn- type s pe ctr um. O n thec ont rary,  we th in k here  that  t he Haged orn-like behavior onlyappear s inthe  high-lyi ngs ect or, thatmost ly concern s t heglueb all s  that  are no t k n own s o fa r  by latti c ecal c u la tions, seeE q .  (\ [preh \]) . 

Nume rica l results
------- - ---------

Acc ordi n g  to  st a ndar d$\mathfrak{su} (3) $s t udies, i tis relevant  to set$\ s igma_ 0\appr ox(9/4 )\ 0.2$ 
 open-string_model in_[@cudell].

As seen from the_above discussion,_an_accurate determination_of_the ratio $T_h/T_c$_is of great_phenomenological interest. However, such_a study is_not_the main purpose of the present paper, where we aim at giving reliable predictions_for_the equation_of_state_of YM theory with an_arbitrary gauge algebra. As observed_in [@meyer], typical_values $T_h\approx T_c$ give very good results in_fitting_the lattice data._Setting $T_c=T_h$, as we will do in the rest_of this work, means that the_deconfinement temperature may_be_identified_with the maximal allowed_temperature for the confined hadronic phase._This assumption has two advantages. First,_it will reproduce accurately the latest $\mathfrak{su}(3)$_lattice data of [@borsa] (see next section),_and it is not in_strong disagreement_with current $\mathfrak{su}(N)$ results, where_$T_h/T_c$ is at_most around_$10 \%$ [@TcTh0; @TcTh]._Second, it is applicable to any_gauge algebra without_having to guess a value for_$T_h/T_c$,_that cannot be_fitted_on_lattice results_since no equation_of_state is_available_for gauge algebras different than $\mathfrak{su}(N)$_so_far. The drawback of this choice is_that it forbids any_discussion_about a superheated hadronic_phase in generic YM theories._Such a refinement of the model_will rather_be the_topic of a separate study.

For completeness, we notice that the somewhat_surprising value $T_h=2.8\, T_c\gg T_c$ has_been found in [@Megias] by_using a_Hagedorn_picture too. The_difference_with our_approach comes from the fact that, in_ [@Megias], $T_h$_is fitted by assuming that the_low-lying glueballs currently known_from_lattice simulations should exhibit a Hagedorn-type_spectrum. On the contrary, we think_here that the Hagedorn-like behavior_only_appears_in the high-lying sector, that_mostly concerns the glueballs that are_not known so_far by lattice calculations, see Eq. (\[preh\]).

Numerical results
-----------------

According_to_standard $\mathfrak{su}(3)$ studies, it is relevant_to_set $\sigma_0\approx(9/4)\ 0.2$