R(\m) = \ell + 1$. Besides, $\alpha < 2 a_i$ for each $1 \le i \le \ell$. Let us write $\alpha = \alpha_1 a_1 + \alpha_2 a_2 + \cdots + \alpha_{\ell}a_{\ell}$ where $\alpha_i \ge 0$. Then one of the $\{\alpha_i\}_{1 \le i \le \ell}$ is positive. Therefore, $\alpha = \alpha_ia_i$ for some $1 \le i \le \ell$, so that $\alpha_i = 1$ and $\alpha = a_i$. This makes a contradiction. Hence $R$ doesn’t have minimal multiplicity.

Consequently, we have the following.

\[4.14\] Suppose that $R_1$ is an $\AGL$ ring, but not a Gorenstein ring. Then the following assertions hold true.

1.  Let $I \in {\mathcal{X}}_R$. Then either $\mu_R(I) = 2$ or $I = {\mathfrak{c}}$.

2.  The set of two-generated Ulrich ideals which are generated by monomials in $t$ is $$\left\{ (t^{2m}, t^{\alpha}) \mid 0<m \in H_1,\ \alpha - m \in H_1,\ 2(\alpha - 2m) \in H\right\}.$$

\(1) Thanks to Proposition \[Ulrich\] (2), if $\mu_R(I) \ge 3$, then ${\mathfrak{c}}\subseteq I$. Since $R$ is a $2$-$\AGL$ ring and $\m \notin {\mathcal{X}}_R$, we conclude that $I = {\mathfrak{c}}$.

\(2) Let $I \in {\mathcal{X}}_R$ such that $\mu_R(I) =2$ and $I$ is generated by monomials in $t$. We write $I = (t^p, t^q)$ where $0 < p < q$ and $p, q \in H$. Notice that, for each $0 < h \in H$ with $h \ne \alpha$, we have that $t^h \in {\mathfrak{c}}$. Since $I + {\mathfrak{c}}= {\mathfrak{m}}$ by Theorem \[2.
R(\m) = \ell + 1$. Besides, $ \alpha < 2 a_i$ for each $ 1 \le i \le \ell$. Let us write $ \alpha = \alpha_1 a_1 + \alpha_2 a_2 + \cdots + \alpha_{\ell}a_{\ell}$ where $ \alpha_i \ge 0$. Then one of the $ \{\alpha_i\}_{1 \le i \le \ell}$ is positive. Therefore, $ \alpha = \alpha_ia_i$ for some $ 1 \le i \le \ell$, so that $ \alpha_i = 1 $ and $ \alpha = a_i$. This make a contradiction. therefore $ R$ does n’t have minimal multiplicity. 

 Consequently, we get the pursuit. 

 \[4.14\ ] Suppose that $ R_1 $ is an $ \AGL$ ring, but not a Gorenstein ring. Then the surveil assertions hold truthful. 

 1.   Let $ I \in { \mathcal{X}}_R$. Then either $ \mu_R(I) = 2 $ or $ I = { \mathfrak{c}}$. 

 2.   The set of two - beget Ulrich ideals which are generated by monomials in $ t$ is $ $ \left\ { (t^{2 m }, t^{\alpha }) \mid 0 < m \in H_1,\ \alpha - m \in H_1,\ 2(\alpha - 2 thousand) \in H\right\}.$$ 

 \(1) Thanks to Proposition \[Ulrich\ ] (2), if $ \mu_R(I) \ge 3 $, then $ { \mathfrak{c}}\subseteq I$. Since $ R$ is a $ 2$-$\AGL$ ring and $ \m \notin { \mathcal{X}}_R$, we conclude that $ I = { \mathfrak{c}}$. 

 \(2) Let $ I \in { \mathcal{X}}_R$ such that $ \mu_R(I) = 2 $ and $ I$ is generated by monomials in $ t$. We write $ I = (t^p, t^q)$ where $ 0 < p < q$ and $ phosphorus, q \in H$. Notice that, for each $ 0 < h \in H$ with $ h \ne \alpha$, we have that $ t^h \in { \mathfrak{c}}$. Since $ I + { \mathfrak{c}}= { \mathfrak{m}}$ by Theorem \[2.
R(\m) = \ell + 1$. Besides, $\alpha < 2 a_l$ for each $1 \le i \le \ell$. Let ua write $\xlpha = \alpha_1 a_1 + \alpha_2 a_2 + \cdovs + \qlpha_{\tjl}a_{\ell}$ where $\alpha_k \ge 0$. Thej one of the $\{\qlpha_i\}_{1 \le m \le \ell}$ is poaltive. Vherefore, $\alpha = \alpha_ia_i$ for some $1 \le h \ue \ell$, so that $\alpha_i = 1$ and $\alpha = a_i$. This mskfs a contradicjion. Nqnce $G$ boesn’t have minimal multiplicitg.

Conseqlently, we have thr following.

\[4.14\] Suppose that $R_1$ is wn $\AGL$ ring, but noh a Gorenstgjn wung. Then the following assertions gold true.

1.  Let $I \in {\mathcal{X}}_R$. Tfen enther $\mu_R(I) = 2$ ir $L = {\mathfrak{c}}$.

2.  The set of two-gcmerateg Ulricn ideals which arx geberated by monomials mn $t$ is $$\left\{ (t^{2m}, t^{\alpra}) \mid 0<m \hn H_1,\ \alpha - m \in H_1,\ 2(\qlpha - 2k) \in H\rieyt\}.$$

\(1) Ghahkx fo Prooosmtion \[Ulricg\] (2), if $\mu_R(I) \te 3$, then ${\mathfrak{c}}\sibfvyeq I$. Since $D$ is a $2$-$\ADL$ ring and $\m \notin {\mathcal{X}}_R$, we concluge fhat $I = {\mathfrak{c}}$.

\(2) Let $I \in {\mathcal{X}}_R$ such thwt $\mu_R(I) =2$ wnd $I$ is generated by monomials in $t$. We write $I = (d^p, t^q)$ dhexc $0 < p < q$ and $p, q \in H$. Notice that, for each $0 < h \in R$ wotm $h \ne \alpha$, we mave that $t^h \in {\mayhvrsh{c}}$. Since $I + {\mxthfrak{c}}= {\jathfrak{m}}$ by Theorfm \[2.
R(\m) = \ell + 1$. Besides, $\alpha a_i$ each $1 i \le \ell$. \alpha_1 + \alpha_2 a_2 \cdots + \alpha_{\ell}a_{\ell}$ $\alpha_i \ge 0$. Then one of $\{\alpha_i\}_{1 \le i \le \ell}$ is positive. Therefore, $\alpha = \alpha_ia_i$ for some \le i \le \ell$, so that $\alpha_i = 1$ and $\alpha = a_i$. makes contradiction. $R$ have minimal multiplicity. Consequently, we have the following. \[4.14\] Suppose that $R_1$ is an $\AGL$ ring, not a Gorenstein ring. Then the following assertions true. 1. Let $I {\mathcal{X}}_R$. Then either $\mu_R(I) = or = {\mathfrak{c}}$. The of Ulrich ideals which generated by monomials in $t$ is $$\left\{ (t^{2m}, t^{\alpha}) \mid 0<m \in H_1,\ \alpha - m \in 2(\alpha - H\right\}.$$ \(1) to \[Ulrich\] if $\mu_R(I) \ge ${\mathfrak{c}}\subseteq I$. Since $R$ is a $\m \notin {\mathcal{X}}_R$, we conclude that $I = \(2) Let \in {\mathcal{X}}_R$ such that $\mu_R(I) =2$ $I$ is generated by monomials in $t$. We $I = (t^p, t^q)$ where $0 < p < q$ and $p, q \in H$. for each $0 < \in H$ with \ne we that \in {\mathfrak{c}}$. $I + {\mathfrak{c}}= {\mathfrak{m}}$ by Theorem \[2.
R(\m) = \ell + 1$. Besides, $\alpha < 2 a_i$ for eacH $1 \le i \le \ell$. LEt us wRitE $\alPhA = \alpHa_1 a_1 + \aLpha_2 a_2 + \cdots + \alphA_{\Ell}a_{\Ell}$ where $\alpha_i \ge 0$. Then onE of thE $\{\aLPha_i\}_{1 \LE i \Le \ell}$ Is positIVe. tHEreFoRe, $\AlpHa = \ALpHa_ia_i$ For Some $1 \le i \Le \ell$, so thaT $\alPhA_i = 1$ and $\alpha = a_i$. tHiS makes a conTraDiction. Hence $r$ doEsn’t haVe MinIMal muLtiPliciTy.

ConsEQuentlY, we have thE fOLlowinG.

\[4.14\] suppose THAt $r_1$ is aN $\AGL$ ring, but not a GoREnSTein ring. Then thE folloWiNG aSSErtIonS hold true.

1.  LEt $i \in {\maTHcal{X}}_R$. THEn EITHer $\MU_R(I) = 2$ or $I = {\mathfraK{c}}$.

2.  The set of tWO-geNerateD ULriCH idealS whicH aRE geNerated by moNomiAls in $t$ is $$\lEft\{ (t^{2m}, t^{\ALpha}) \mid 0<M \In H_1,\ \alphA - m \in H_1,\ 2(\aLphA - 2m) \iN H\riGHt\}.$$

\(1) thAnkS tO proPOsItiON \[UlRich\] (2), if $\mu_r(I) \Ge 3$, Then ${\mAthfRAK{C}}\SubsEteQ I$. SiNce $R$ iS a $2$-$\AGL$ ring and $\m \NotIn {\maTHcaL{X}}_R$, we ConclUde tHaT $I = {\matHfrak{c}}$.

\(2) let $I \iN {\mAthcal{X}}_R$ such thaT $\mu_R(i) =2$ and $I$ is geNerAtEd bY mOnomiALs in $t$. WE wrIte $i = (t^p, t^q)$ whEre $0 < p < q$ anD $P, q \iN H$. nOTIcE that, for each $0 < h \in H$ wiTh $H \NE \aLpha$, we haVe that $T^H \iN {\mAThfrak{c}}$. SInCe $I + {\MathFRAk{c}}= {\maThfrAK{m}}$ By TheoreM \[2.
R(\m) = \ell + 1$. Besides , $\alpha< 2 a _i$  fo reach  $1\le i \le \ell $ . Le t us write $\alpha = \ alpha _1 a_1+  \ alpha _2 a_2+  \ c d ots  +  \ alp ha _ {\ ell}a _{\ ell}$ w here $\alp ha_ i\ge 0$. Then on e of the $ \{\ alpha_i\}_{1  \l e i \l e\el l }$ is  po sitiv e. The r efore,  $\alpha=\ alpha_ i a_i$ fo r so me $ 1 \le i \le \ell$ ,  s o  that $\alpha_ i = 1$  a n d$ \ alp ha= a_i$. Th is  make s  a cont r ad i c t ion .  Hence $R$ do esn’t havem ini mal mu lt ipl i city.
Cons eq u ent ly, we have  the  followin g.

\[ 4 .14\] S u ppose t hat $R _1$  is  an$ \A GL $ r in g , b u tnot a G orenstei nri ng. T hent h e foll owi ng a ssert ions hold tru e.
1.Let  $I \ in {\ math ca l{X}} _R$. T hen e it her $\mu_R(I) =  2$or $I = { \ma th fra k{ c}}$. 
2.  T heset  of two -genera t edUl r i c hideals which are g en e r at ed by mo nomial s  i n$ t$ is $$ \l eft \{ ( t ^ {2m},  t^{ \ al pha}) \m id 0<m \i nH_1,\ \ al pha -m\in  H_ 1,\ 2 ( \alp ha - 2 m) \in H \righ t \}.$$

\(1) Th a nks to Propos i ti o n  \ [ Ulri ch\ ] (2), if $ \mu_ R (I)\ge3 $,  th e n ${\ mathf ra k {c } }\subseteq I$. Sinc e$R$ is  a $2 $-$\AGL$ ring  and $\m \ n o t in {\mat hcal { X} } _R$, we conclu de th at $I = {\ m athfrak{ c}}$. 

\(2) L et $I \in { \mathcal {X} }_R $ s uch t ha t $\mu_R(I) = 2 $  and  $ I$ is g ene rated b y m ono mia lsin  $t$. Wewrite $I  =  ( t^ p,  t^ q)$ w h ere $0 <  p  <q$  an d $p, q \inH$. N otic eth a t,for eac h  $ 0 < h\i nH$ w ith  $ h \ne  \al p ha$ , we ha ve that $ t^h \in{\ ma thfrak{ c}}$. Since $ I+ {\mathfr ak {c} }= {\m a t hfrak{m} }$ by Theorem \[2.
R(\m) =_\ell +_1$. Besides, $\alpha <_2 a_i$_for_each $1_\le_i \le \ell$._Let us write_$\alpha = \alpha_1 a_1_+ \alpha_2 a_2_+_\cdots + \alpha_{\ell}a_{\ell}$ where $\alpha_i \ge 0$. Then one of the $\{\alpha_i\}_{1 \le i_\le_\ell}$ is_positive._Therefore,_$\alpha = \alpha_ia_i$ for some_$1 \le i \le \ell$,_so that_$\alpha_i = 1$ and $\alpha = a_i$. This_makes_a contradiction. Hence_$R$ doesn’t have minimal multiplicity.

Consequently, we have the following.

\[4.14\]_Suppose that $R_1$ is an $\AGL$_ring, but not_a_Gorenstein_ring. Then the following_assertions hold true.

1.  Let $I_\in {\mathcal{X}}_R$. Then either $\mu_R(I) =_2$ or $I = {\mathfrak{c}}$.

2.  The_set of two-generated Ulrich ideals which_are generated by monomials in_$t$ is_$$\left\{ (t^{2m}, t^{\alpha}) \mid 0<m_\in H_1,\ \alpha_- m_\in H_1,\ 2(\alpha_- 2m) \in H\right\}.$$

\(1) Thanks to_Proposition \[Ulrich\] (2),_if $\mu_R(I) \ge 3$, then ${\mathfrak{c}}\subseteq_I$._Since $R$ is_a_$2$-$\AGL$_ring and_$\m \notin {\mathcal{X}}_R$,_we_conclude that_$I_= {\mathfrak{c}}$.

\(2) Let $I \in {\mathcal{X}}_R$_such_that $\mu_R(I) =2$ and $I$ is generated_by monomials in $t$._We_write $I = (t^p,_t^q)$ where $0 < p_< q$ and $p, q \in_H$. Notice_that, for_each $0 < h \in H$ with $h \ne \alpha$, we_have that $t^h \in {\mathfrak{c}}$. Since_$I + {\mathfrak{c}}= {\mathfrak{m}}$_by Theorem_\[2.