HS_{2,lip,j}$$ The point of this splitting is that we will need to use a more complicated procedure to estimate $w_{2,lip,0}$, since too many logarithmic losses in estimates are insufficient for our purposes. We have $$|WRHS_{2,lip,1}(t,r)| \leq \frac{C ||e_{1}-e_{2}||_{X} \mathbbm{1}_{\{r \geq \frac{g_{0}(t)}{4}\}} \lambda_{0}(t)^{4}}{t^{2} \log^{\delta-\delta_{2}}(t) \log^{2b}(t) (g_{0}(t)^{2}+r^{2})^{2}}$$ Using the analog of, and a similar procedure used to estimate various integrals arising in the $w_{2}$ estimates above, we get $$|w_{2,lip,1}(t,r)| \leq \frac{C ||e_{1}-e_{2}||_{X} \lambda_{0}(t)^{4} \log(t)}{t^{2} \log^{\delta-\delta_{2}}(t) \log^{2b}(t) g_{0}(t)^{2}}, \quad r >0$$ In particular, the procedure used to estimate $w_{2,lip,1}$ does not involve any derivatives of $WRHS_{2,lip,1}$, which is why we did not need to prove any estimates on derivatives of $v_{c}^{\lambda_{1}}-v_{c}^{\lambda_{2}}$. (Note that $v_{c}^{\lambda_{1}}-v_{c}^{\lambda_{2}}$ arises in some terms of $WRHS_{2,lip,1}$). Next, we note that $$\begin{split}&|\partial_{r}WRHS_{2,lip,0}(t,r)| + \frac{|WRHS_{2,lip,0}(t,r)|}{r} \\
&\leq C \mathbbm{1}_{\{r \geq \frac{g_{0}(t)}{4}\}} \left(\frac{r \lambda_{0}(t)^{2} ||e_{1}-e_{2}||_{X}}{t^{2} \log^{\delta-\delta_{2}}(t) (r^{2}+\lambda_{0}(t)^{2})^{2}}\right)\left(\frac{1}{\log^{b}(t)}+\frac{1}{\log(t)}\
HS_{2,lip, j}$$ The point of this splitting is that we will need to use a more complicated procedure to calculate $ w_{2,lip,0}$, since excessively many logarithmic losses in estimates are insufficient for our determination. We own $ $ |WRHS_{2,lip,1}(t, r)| \leq \frac{C ||e_{1}-e_{2}||_{X } \mathbbm{1}_{\{r \geq \frac{g_{0}(t)}{4}\ } } \lambda_{0}(t)^{4}}{t^{2 } \log^{\delta-\delta_{2}}(t) \log^{2b}(t) (g_{0}(t)^{2}+r^{2})^{2}}$$ Using the analog of, and a alike procedure used to calculate diverse integrals arise in the $ w_{2}$ estimates above, we get $ $ |w_{2,lip,1}(t, r)| \leq \frac{C ||e_{1}-e_{2}||_{X } \lambda_{0}(t)^{4 } \log(t)}{t^{2 } \log^{\delta-\delta_{2}}(t) \log^{2b}(t) g_{0}(t)^{2 } }, \quad gas constant > 0$$ In especial, the procedure used to estimate $ w_{2,lip,1}$ does not involve any derivatives of $ WRHS_{2,lip,1}$, which is why we did not necessitate to prove any estimates on derivatives of $ v_{c}^{\lambda_{1}}-v_{c}^{\lambda_{2}}$. (notice that $ v_{c}^{\lambda_{1}}-v_{c}^{\lambda_{2}}$ arises in some terms of $ WRHS_{2,lip,1}$). Next, we notice that $ $ \begin{split}&|\partial_{r}WRHS_{2,lip,0}(t, r)| + \frac{|WRHS_{2,lip,0}(t, r)|}{r } \\ 
 & \leq C \mathbbm{1}_{\{r \geq \frac{g_{0}(t)}{4}\ } } \left(\frac{r \lambda_{0}(t)^{2 } ||e_{1}-e_{2}||_{X}}{t^{2 } \log^{\delta-\delta_{2}}(t) (r^{2}+\lambda_{0}(t)^{2})^{2}}\right)\left(\frac{1}{\log^{b}(t)}+\frac{1}{\log(t)}\
HS_{2,llp,j}$$ The point of this spuitting is that we wiln need to use x more complicated procedure ti estumate $w_{2,lip,0}$, since too mxny logarpthmic lowses un estimatxa are ikfuffjgient hor our purposex. We have $$|FRHS_{2,lip,1}(t,r)| \leq \xrxc{E ||e_{1}-e_{2}||_{X} \mathbbm{1}_{\{r \geq \frac{g_{0}(t)}{4}\}} \lambda_{0}(t)^{4}}{t^{2} \ljg^{\delta-\cepta_{2}}(t) \log^{2b}(t) (g_{0}(t)^{2}+r^{2})^{2}}$$ Usimd ths analog of, and a similar procedurs used uo estimate varioux integrals arising in the $w_{2}$ edtimates above, we het $$|w_{2,lip,1}(t,r)| \oeq \seac{C ||e_{1}-e_{2}||_{X} \lamcda_{0}(t)^{4} \log(t)}{t^{2} \log^{\delta-\delja_{2}}(t) \log^{2b}(t) g_{0}(t)^{2}}, \quad r >0$$ In particulxr, thz procedure uwed jo estimate $x_{2,lip,1}$ djes not involve any gerivatoves of $WRHS_{2,lii,1}$, whirh iw why we did not need to prove any estiiates on gexivatives of $v_{c}^{\lambda_{1}}-c_{c}^{\oambdd_{2}}$. (Node tfqt $x_{c}^{\lzmuda_{1}}-b_{c}^{\lambfa_{2}}$ erises in skme terms od $WRHS_{2,lip,1}$). Next, we nptq that $$\begin{spmit}&|\pareiwl_{r}WRHS_{2,lip,0}(t,r)| + \frac{|WRHS_{2,lip,0}(t,r)|}{r} \\
&\leq C \mathtbm{1}_{\{d \geq \frac{g_{0}(t)}{4}\}} \left(\frac{r \oambda_{0}(t)^{2} ||e_{1}-e_{2}||_{X}}{t^{2} \log^{\delta-\felta_{2}}(t) (r^{2}+\lwmbda_{0}(t)^{2})^{2}}\right)\left(\frac{1}{\log^{b}(t)}+\frac{1}{\log(t)}\
HS_{2,lip,j}$$ The point of this splitting is will to use more complicated procedure many losses in estimates insufficient for our We have $$|WRHS_{2,lip,1}(t,r)| \leq \frac{C ||e_{1}-e_{2}||_{X} \geq \frac{g_{0}(t)}{4}\}} \lambda_{0}(t)^{4}}{t^{2} \log^{\delta-\delta_{2}}(t) \log^{2b}(t) (g_{0}(t)^{2}+r^{2})^{2}}$$ Using the analog of, and a similar used to estimate various integrals arising in the $w_{2}$ estimates above, we get \leq ||e_{1}-e_{2}||_{X} \log(t)}{t^{2} \log^{2b}(t) g_{0}(t)^{2}}, \quad r >0$$ In particular, the procedure used to estimate $w_{2,lip,1}$ does not involve derivatives of $WRHS_{2,lip,1}$, which is why we did need to prove any on derivatives of $v_{c}^{\lambda_{1}}-v_{c}^{\lambda_{2}}$. (Note $v_{c}^{\lambda_{1}}-v_{c}^{\lambda_{2}}$ in some of Next, note that $$\begin{split}&|\partial_{r}WRHS_{2,lip,0}(t,r)| \frac{|WRHS_{2,lip,0}(t,r)|}{r} \\ &\leq C \mathbbm{1}_{\{r \geq \frac{g_{0}(t)}{4}\}} \left(\frac{r \lambda_{0}(t)^{2} ||e_{1}-e_{2}||_{X}}{t^{2} \log^{\delta-\delta_{2}}(t) (r^{2}+\lambda_{0}(t)^{2})^{2}}\right)\left(\frac{1}{\log^{b}(t)}+\frac{1}{\log(t)}\
HS_{2,lip,j}$$ The point of this splitTing is that We wilL neEd tO uSe a mOre cOmplicated procEDure To estimate $w_{2,lip,0}$, since too Many lOgARithMIc LosseS in estiMAtES Are InSuFfiCiENt For ouR puRposes. WE have $$|WRHS_{2,lIp,1}(t,R)| \lEq \frac{C ||e_{1}-e_{2}||_{X} \maTHbBm{1}_{\{r \geq \frac{G_{0}(t)}{4}\}} \lAmbda_{0}(t)^{4}}{t^{2} \log^{\deLta-\Delta_{2}}(t) \LoG^{2b}(t) (G_{0}(T)^{2}+r^{2})^{2}}$$ UsiNg tHe anaLog of, aND a simiLar procedUrE Used to EStimate VARiOus iNtegrals arising in THe $W_{2}$ Estimates above, We get $$|w_{2,LiP,1}(T,r)| \LEQ \frAc{C ||E_{1}-e_{2}||_{X} \lambda_{0}(t)^{4} \LoG(t)}{t^{2} \loG^{\Delta-\deLTa_{2}}(T) \LOG^{2b}(t) G_{0}(T)^{2}}, \quad r >0$$ In partiCular, the proCEduRe used To EstIMate $w_{2,lIp,1}$ doeS nOT inVolve any derIvatIves of $WRHs_{2,lip,1}$, whICh is why WE did not Need to ProVe aNy esTImAtEs oN dERivATiVes OF $v_{c}^{\Lambda_{1}}-v_{c}^{\LaMbDa_{2}}$. (NotE thaT $V_{C}^{\LAmbdA_{1}}-v_{c}^{\LambDa_{2}}$ ariSes in some termS of $wRHS_{2,LIp,1}$). NExt, we Note tHat $$\bEgIn{splIt}&|\partIal_{r}WrHs_{2,lip,0}(t,r)| + \frac{|WRHS_{2,lIp,0}(t,r)|}{R} \\
&\leq C \mathBbm{1}_{\{R \gEq \fRaC{g_{0}(t)}{4}\}} \leFT(\frac{r \LamBda_{0}(T)^{2} ||e_{1}-e_{2}||_{X}}{t^{2} \loG^{\delta-\dELta_{2}}(T) (r^{2}+\LAMBdA_{0}(t)^{2})^{2}}\right)\left(\frac{1}{\log^{B}(t)}+\FRAc{1}{\Log(t)}\
HS_{2,lip,j}$$ The point o f this spl ittin g i s t ha t we  wil l need to usea  mor e complicated procedur e toes t imat e  $ w_{2, lip,0}$ ,  s i n ceto oman yl og arith mic  losses  in estima tes  a re insuffici e nt  for our p urp oses. We hav e $ $|WRHS _{ 2,l i p,1}( t,r )| \l eq \fr a c{C || e_{1}-e_{ 2} | |_{X}\ mathbbm { 1 }_ {\{r  \geq \frac{g_{0} ( t) } {4}\}} \lambda _{0}(t )^ { 4} } { t^{ 2}\log^{\del ta -\del t a_{2}}( t )\ l o g^{ 2 b}(t) (g_{0}( t)^{2}+r^{2 } )^{ 2}}$$Us ing the an alogof ,  an d a similar  pro cedure us ed toe stimate various  integ ral s a risi n gin  th e$ w_{ 2 }$  es t ima tes abov e,  w e get  $$| w _ { 2 ,lip ,1} (t,r )| \l eq \frac{C || e_{ 1}-e _ {2} ||_{X } \la mbda _{ 0}(t) ^{4} \ log(t )} {t^{2} \log^{\d elta -\delta_{ 2}} (t ) \ lo g^{2b } (t) g_ {0} (t) ^{2}},\quad r >0$ $I n pa rticular, the proc ed u r eused toestima t e$w _ {2,lip,1 }$  do es n o t  invo lvea ny  derivat ives o f  $ WR HS_{2,l ip ,1}$,wh ich  is  whyw e di d notneed toprove any estimateso n derivatives of $ v_ { c}^{ \la mbda_{1}}-v _{c} ^ {\la mbda _ {2 }}$ .  (Not e tha t$ v_ { c}^{\lambda_{1}}-v_ {c }^{\la mbda_ {2}}$ arisesin some te r m s  of $WRH S_{2 , li p ,1}$). Next, w e not e that $$\ b egin{spl it}&| \partial _{r}WRHS_ { 2 ,lip,0}( t,r )|+ \ fra c { |W RHS_{2,lip,0} ( t ,r)| }{ r} \\
& \le q C \ma thb bm{ 1}_ {\{ r\geq \fra c{g_{0}( t) }{ 4} \} } \ left( \ frac{r \ la mbd a_ {0} (t)^{ 2 } ||e_ {1}-e _{2} || _{ X }}{ t^{2} \ l og ^ { \del ta -\ delt a_{ 2} }(t)(r^{ 2 }+\ lambda_ {0}(t)^{2 })^ { 2}}\ ri gh t)\left (\frac{1}{\lo g^ {b}(t)}+\f ra c{1 }{\log ( t )}\
HS_{2,lip,j}$$ The_point of_this splitting is that_we will_need_to use_a_more complicated procedure_to estimate $w_{2,lip,0}$,_since too many logarithmic_losses in estimates_are_insufficient for our purposes. We have $$|WRHS_{2,lip,1}(t,r)| \leq \frac{C ||e_{1}-e_{2}||_{X} \mathbbm{1}_{\{r \geq \frac{g_{0}(t)}{4}\}} \lambda_{0}(t)^{4}}{t^{2}_\log^{\delta-\delta_{2}}(t)_\log^{2b}(t) (g_{0}(t)^{2}+r^{2})^{2}}$$_Using_the_analog of, and a similar_procedure used to estimate various_integrals arising_in the $w_{2}$ estimates above, we get $$|w_{2,lip,1}(t,r)|_\leq_\frac{C ||e_{1}-e_{2}||_{X} \lambda_{0}(t)^{4}_\log(t)}{t^{2} \log^{\delta-\delta_{2}}(t) \log^{2b}(t) g_{0}(t)^{2}}, \quad r >0$$ In particular,_the procedure used to estimate $w_{2,lip,1}$_does not involve_any_derivatives_of $WRHS_{2,lip,1}$, which is_why we did not need to_prove any estimates on derivatives of_$v_{c}^{\lambda_{1}}-v_{c}^{\lambda_{2}}$. (Note that $v_{c}^{\lambda_{1}}-v_{c}^{\lambda_{2}}$ arises in some_terms of $WRHS_{2,lip,1}$). Next, we note_that $$\begin{split}&|\partial_{r}WRHS_{2,lip,0}(t,r)| + \frac{|WRHS_{2,lip,0}(t,r)|}{r} \\
&\leq_C \mathbbm{1}_{\{r_\geq \frac{g_{0}(t)}{4}\}} \left(\frac{r \lambda_{0}(t)^{2} ||e_{1}-e_{2}||_{X}}{t^{2}_\log^{\delta-\delta_{2}}(t) (r^{2}+\lambda_{0}(t)^{2})^{2}}\right)\left(\frac{1}{\log^{b}(t)}+\frac{1}{\log(t)}\