 for weak (Fig. 3a) and for strong (Fig. 3b) damping, as well as for the different degrees of nonlinearity. This plot shows that the difference $z^{(1)}(\tau)$ first increases and then saturates at some level determined by the degree of nonlinearity and dissipation.

We start our analysis with the case of weak dissipation (Fig. 3a). For weak dissipation, the level of saturation of $z^{(1)}(\tau)$ increases with consequent consideration of higher nonlinearities. This result may be qualitatively understood as follows. For weak dissipation, the time interval of almost lossless behavior $\tau\lesssim\tau_1$ (\[tau\_1\]) is rather long and therefore the asymptotic behavior of $z^{(1)}(\tau)$ sufficiently depends on its behavior during the time $0\leq\tau\lesssim\tau_1$. For $\tau\lesssim\tau_1$, we can use the approximation (\[B9\]), i.e. $|z^{(1)}(\tau_1)|\simeq\tau_1^2
l^3=l/\Gamma^2$. This estimate shows that the level of saturation for $z^{(1)}(\tau)$ should increase with the growth of $l$.

Turn to the case of strong dissipation (Fig. 3b). For strong dissipation, the level of saturation of $z^{(1)}(\tau)$ is sufficiently lower in comparison with the case of weak dissipation (compare Fig. 3a and Fig. 3b). Moreover, the level of saturation for $l=1$ is slightly higher than for nonlinearities with $l>1$ and the difference of the saturation levels for the different nonlinearities with $l>1$ is practically invisible. To understand such behavior we note that for strong enough dissipation the time interval for almost lossless dynamics $\tau\lesssim\tau_1$ is short and the behavior of $Q(\tau)$ for another time interval $[\tau_1, \infty]$ is more sufficient (Fig. 2b). For the nonlinearity with $l=1$, $Q(\tau)$ has slowly decreasing tail, while it decays rapidly for $l>1$ (Fig. 2b). As a result, the area under the curve $Q(\tau)$ for $l=1$ is greater than the areas under the curves corresponding to different $l$ with $l>1$. Yet, because all $Q(\tau)$ are fastly decreasing functions at
for weak (Fig.   3a) and for strong (Fig.   3b) damping, as well as for the unlike academic degree of nonlinearity. This plot shows that the difference $ z^{(1)}(\tau)$ inaugural increase and then saturates at some level specify by the academic degree of nonlinearity and dissipation. 

 We start our analysis with the case of weak waste (Fig.   3a). For weak dissipation, the degree of saturation of $ z^{(1)}(\tau)$ increases with consequent consideration of higher nonlinearities. This result may be qualitatively understand as follows. For weak dissipation, the prison term interval of almost lossless behavior $ \tau\lesssim\tau_1 $ (\[tau\_1\ ]) is rather retentive and therefore the asymptotic behavior of $ z^{(1)}(\tau)$ sufficiently depends on its behavior during the time $ 0\leq\tau\lesssim\tau_1$. For $ \tau\lesssim\tau_1 $, we can practice the approximation (\[B9\ ]), i.e. $ |z^{(1)}(\tau_1)|\simeq\tau_1 ^ 2 
 l^3 = l/\Gamma^2$. This estimate shows that the level of saturation for $ z^{(1)}(\tau)$ should increase with the growth of $ l$. 

 call on to the case of strong dissipation (Fig.   3b). For strong dissipation, the level of saturation of $ z^{(1)}(\tau)$ is sufficiently lower in comparison with the case of weak profligacy (compare Fig.   3a and Fig.   3b). Moreover, the level of impregnation for $ l=1 $ is slenderly higher than for nonlinearities with $ l>1 $ and the difference of the saturation levels for the unlike nonlinearities with $ l>1 $ is practically inconspicuous. To understand such behavior we note that for firm enough dissipation the time interval for almost lossless moral force $ \tau\lesssim\tau_1 $ is short and the behavior of $ Q(\tau)$ for another time interval $ [ \tau_1, \infty]$ is more sufficient (Fig.   2b). For the nonlinearity with $ l=1 $, $ Q(\tau)$ has slowly decreasing tail, while it disintegrate rapidly for $ l>1 $ (Fig.   2b). As a result, the area under the curve $ Q(\tau)$ for $ l=1 $ is greater than the area under the curves corresponding to different $ l$ with $ l>1$. Yet, because all $ Q(\tau)$ are fastly decreasing functions at
 fog weak (Fig. 3a) and for strokg (Fig. 3b) damping, cw well as fod the diwferent degrees of nonlinearmty. Rhis kjot shows that the differenbe $z^{(1)}(\tau)$ furst uncreases ehd then saturzbes ac wome level detgrmined by tve degree of nmnuiuearity and dissipation.

We start our wnalysix aith the case jf wtak disappction (Fig. 3a). For weak dissipation, the lenel of saturation of $z^{(1)}(\tau)$ increases with cojseqkent consideration of higher bonlybearities. Thks result may be qualijatively understood as follows. Fur weck dissipatuob, tjg time intertal of almost lossless behdvior $\tsu\lesssim\tau_1$ (\[tsu\_1\]) ms rqther long and therefmre the asymptotic behavior oy $z^{(1)}(\tau)$ sufficiently dwpwnds mn ids bdyavkor dnrihg the tije $0\leq\tau\lssssim\tau_1$. Fir $\tau\lesssim\tau_1$, we cwb use the appdoximaeijn (\[B9\]), i.e. $|z^{(1)}(\tau_1)|\simeq\tau_1^2
l^3=l/\Gamma^2$. This estimaue shkws that the level of sqturation for $z^{(1)}(\tau)$ shluld incrqase with the growth of $l$.

Turn to the case of strotg diaripcblon (Wug. 3h). For strong dissipation, the level of saturatykn on $z^{(1)}(\tau)$ is sufficlently lower in cokpwrofon with the zase oy wsak dissipation (colpare Fyg. 3a abd Fig. 3b). Mjreofer, the level of saturation for $l=1$ is slpghtoy higher than for nonlinearicies woth $l>1$ and the difference of che safuration legels for ffe different nonuinvaridies with $l>1$ is practically invisiblx. To bnderstavd soch behwvior we nlte tmdt for strong enouhh didshpation thf time interval for almost lossless dynamics $\jau\nesvsim\tau_1$ ns shovt and the behadior of $Q(\tau)$ fpr anotker tioe intervam $[\tau_1, \iifty]$ is more sufficient (Fhh. 2b). For the nmnlinearyty qith $l=1$, $Q(\tau)$ fas slowly decteasing tcnl, while ut decays rapidly nor $l>1$ (Rig. 2b). As a resulc, uhw area under tne zurde $Q(\vau)$ fjs $l=1$ is greatar tfan yhe afeas under bhe curfes corresponding to difrerent $l$ with $l>1$. Yey, necause aol $Q(\tau)$ wre fastly devreasing functions at
for weak (Fig. 3a) and for strong damping, well as the different degrees that difference $z^{(1)}(\tau)$ first and then saturates some level determined by the degree nonlinearity and dissipation. We start our analysis with the case of weak dissipation 3a). For weak dissipation, the level of saturation of $z^{(1)}(\tau)$ increases with consequent of nonlinearities. result be qualitatively understood as follows. For weak dissipation, the time interval of almost lossless behavior $\tau\lesssim\tau_1$ is rather long and therefore the asymptotic behavior $z^{(1)}(\tau)$ sufficiently depends on behavior during the time $0\leq\tau\lesssim\tau_1$. $\tau\lesssim\tau_1$, can use approximation i.e. l^3=l/\Gamma^2$. This estimate that the level of saturation for $z^{(1)}(\tau)$ should increase with the growth of $l$. Turn to the of strong 3b). For dissipation, level saturation of $z^{(1)}(\tau)$ lower in comparison with the case (compare Fig. 3a and Fig. 3b). Moreover, the of saturation $l=1$ is slightly higher than for with $l>1$ and the difference of the saturation for the different nonlinearities with $l>1$ is practically invisible. To understand such behavior we note strong enough dissipation the interval for almost dynamics is and behavior of for another time interval $[\tau_1, \infty]$ is more sufficient (Fig. 2b). the nonlinearity with $l=1$, $Q(\tau)$ has slowly decreasing tail, while rapidly $l>1$ (Fig. 2b). a result, the area the $Q(\tau)$ for $l=1$ is the under to $l$ $l>1$. Yet, because all are fastly decreasing functions at
 for weak (Fig. 3a) and for strong (FiG. 3b) damping, aS well As fOr tHe DiffErenT degrees of nonlINearIty. This plot shows that thE diffErENce $z^{(1)}(\TAu)$ First IncreasES aND TheN sAtUraTeS At Some lEveL determIned by the dEgrEe Of nonlineariTY aNd dissipatIon.

we start our anAlySis witH tHe cASe of wEak DissiPation (fIg. 3a). For Weak dissiPaTIon, the LEvel of sATUrAtioN of $z^{(1)}(\tau)$ increases wITh COnsequent consiDeratiOn OF hIGHer NonLinearitieS. THis reSUlt may bE QuALITatIVely understooD as follows. FOR weAk dissIpAtiON, the tiMe intErVAl oF almost lossLess Behavior $\tAu\lessSIm\tau_1$ (\[taU\_1\]) Is ratheR long aNd tHerEforE ThE aSymPtOTic BEhAviOR of $Z^{(1)}(\tau)$ suffIcIeNtly dEpenDS ON Its bEhaVior DurinG the time $0\leq\taU\leSssiM\Tau_1$. for $\taU\lessSim\tAu_1$, We can Use the ApproXiMation (\[B9\]), i.e. $|z^{(1)}(\tau_1)|\siMeq\tAu_1^2
l^3=l/\Gamma^2$. thiS eStiMaTe shoWS that tHe lEveL of satuRation fOR $z^{(1)}(\tAu)$ SHOUlD increase with the grOwTH Of $L$.

Turn to tHe case OF sTrONg dissipAtIon (fig. 3b). fOR stroNg diSSiPation, thE level OF sAtUration Of $Z^{(1)}(\tau)$ is SuFfiCieNtly lOWer iN compaRison witH the cASe of weak dissipATion (compare FiG. 3A aND fiG. 3B). MorEovEr, the level oF satURatiOn foR $L=1$ iS slIGhtly HigheR tHAn FOr nonlinearities witH $l>1$ And the DiffeRence of the satUration levELS For the diFferENt NOnlinearities wIth $l>1$ iS practicalLY invisibLe. To uNderstanD such behaVIOr we note ThaT foR stRonG ENoUgh dissipatioN THe tiMe IntervaL foR almost LosSleSs dYnaMiCs $\tau\lessSim\tau_1$ is ShOrT aNd The BehavIOr of $Q(\tau)$ FoR anOtHer Time iNTerval $[\Tau_1, \inFty]$ iS mOrE SufFicient (fIg. 2B). fOr thE nOnLineAriTy With $l=1$, $q(\tau)$ HAs sLowly deCreasing tAil, WHile It DeCays rapIdly for $l>1$ (Fig. 2b). AS a Result, the aReA unDer the CURve $Q(\tau)$ fOr $l=1$ is greater than the areaS Under thE cuRves cOrreSponding tO diFferenT $l$ wITh $l>1$. Yet, BecausE all $Q(\TaU)$ arE FAstly DECrEasInG functions AT
 for weak (Fig. 3a) and fo r strong ( Fig.3b)  da mp ing,  aswell as for th e  dif ferent degrees of nonl inear it y . Th i splotshows t h at t hedi ff ere nc e  $ z^{(1 )}( \tau)$first incr eas es  and then sa t ur ates at so melevel determ ine d by t he  de g ree o f n onlin earity and di ssipation .We sta r t our a n a ly siswith the case ofw ea k  dissipation ( Fig. 3 a) .  F o r  we akdissipatio n,  thel evel of sa t u r ati o n of $z^{(1)} (\tau)$ inc r eas es wit hcon s equent  cons id e rat ion of high er n onlineari ties.T his res u lt maybe qua lit ati vely un de rst oo d  as fo llo w s.For weak  d is sipat ion, t h e  tim e i nter val o f almost loss les s be h avi or $\ tau\l esss im \tau_ 1$ (\[ tau\_ 1\ ]) is rather lo ng a nd theref ore  t heas ympto t ic beh avi orof $z^{ (1)}(\t a u)$  s u f f ic iently depends onit s be havior d uringt he  t i me $0\le q\ tau \les s s im\ta u_1$ .  F or $\tau \lesss i m\ ta u_1$, w ecan us ethe  ap proxi m atio n (\[B 9\]), i. e. $| z ^{(1)}(\tau_1) | \simeq\tau_1^ 2 
l ^ 3 =l / \Gam ma^ 2$. This es tima t e sh owst ha t t h e lev el of  s a tu r ation for $z^{(1)}( \t au)$ s hould  increase wit h the grow t h of $l$.
Tur n  t o  the case of s trong  dissipati o n (Fig.3b).For stro ng dissip a t ion, the  le vel  of  sa t u ra tion of $z^{( 1 ) }(\t au )$ is s uff icientl y l owe r i n c om parison w ith theca se  o fwea k dis s ipation(c omp ar e F ig. 3 a  and F ig. 3 b).Mo re o ver , the l e ve l of s at ur atio n f or  $l=1 $ is sli ghtly h igher tha n f o r no nl in earitie s with $l>1$an d the diff er enc e of t h e  saturat ion levels for the diff e rent no nli neari ties  with $l> 1$is pra cti c ally i nvisib le. T ound e r stand s uc h b eh avior we n o t e t hat f or  str ong eno ugh dissipation th e  ti me interval f oralmo s t  l oss l es s  dy na m ics $ \tau\lesssim\ta u_1$ is sh or t  a nd the beh a vio rof $Q(\ tau)$ f or an o ther ti me interv al $[\tau _1 , \i n f ty] $ is moresufficie nt (Fig.2 b). F o rthe n onl ineari ty  wi th $l =1$, $ Q (\t au)$has sl ow ly dec reasi ng  tail, w hile it decays rapidlyfor $l >1$ ( Fig . 2b). As  ar esu lt, the a reaunder thecur ve$Q(\t au) $  for$l=1 $  i s g r eater  tha n  the area s  u nde r th e curves co r r e spo nding  to differ ent$l$ with $l>1$. Y e t, because all  $Q( \ t au) $ a r e fa st ly decreasingfun ct i o ns at
 for_weak (Fig. 3a)_and for strong (Fig. 3b)_damping, as_well_as for_the_different degrees of_nonlinearity. This plot_shows that the difference_$z^{(1)}(\tau)$ first increases_and_then saturates at some level determined by the degree of nonlinearity and dissipation.

We start_our_analysis with_the_case_of weak dissipation (Fig. 3a). For_weak dissipation, the level of_saturation of_$z^{(1)}(\tau)$ increases with consequent consideration of higher nonlinearities._This_result may be_qualitatively understood as follows. For weak dissipation, the time_interval of almost lossless behavior $\tau\lesssim\tau_1$_(\[tau\_1\]) is rather_long_and_therefore the asymptotic behavior_of $z^{(1)}(\tau)$ sufficiently depends on its_behavior during the time $0\leq\tau\lesssim\tau_1$. For_$\tau\lesssim\tau_1$, we can use the approximation (\[B9\]),_i.e. $|z^{(1)}(\tau_1)|\simeq\tau_1^2
l^3=l/\Gamma^2$. This estimate shows that_the level of saturation for_$z^{(1)}(\tau)$ should_increase with the growth of_$l$.

Turn to the_case of_strong dissipation (Fig. 3b)._For strong dissipation, the level of_saturation of $z^{(1)}(\tau)$_is sufficiently lower in comparison with_the_case of weak_dissipation_(compare_Fig. 3a and_Fig. 3b). Moreover, the_level_of saturation_for_$l=1$ is slightly higher than for_nonlinearities_with $l>1$ and the difference of the_saturation levels for the_different_nonlinearities with $l>1$ is_practically invisible. To understand such_behavior we note that for strong_enough dissipation_the time_interval for almost lossless dynamics $\tau\lesssim\tau_1$ is short and the behavior_of $Q(\tau)$ for another time interval_$[\tau_1, \infty]$ is more_sufficient (Fig. 2b)._For_the nonlinearity with_$l=1$,_$Q(\tau)$ has_slowly decreasing tail, while it decays rapidly_for $l>1$_(Fig. 2b). As a result, the area_under the curve $Q(\tau)$_for_$l=1$ is greater than the areas_under the curves corresponding to different_$l$ with $l>1$. Yet, because_all_$Q(\tau)$_are fastly decreasing functions at