9
   0.0316         9
   0.0100        24

  : Ratio of the wind X-ray luminosities as a function of wind momentum ratio, $\eta$, for colliding wind systems with equal, spatially invariant wind speeds, equal abundances, and near to the adiabatic limit.[]{data-label="tab:ad_lim"}

$L_{1}/L_{2}$ in-between these limits {#sec:inbetween}
-------------------------------------

Estimates of the luminosity ratio for systems where the shocked winds are in-between the limiting radiative and adiabatic cases must be done on a case-by-case basis. Somewhere in this region of parameter space, the wind which dominates the X-ray emission must switch over from the one with the faster pre-shock speed (radiative limit) to the one with the slower pre-shock speed (adiabatic limit). In contrast, situations where one wind is clearly radiative and the other is closer to being adiabatic will have their X-ray emission dominated by the former (in $\gamma^{2}$ Velorum, where $\chi_{1} \ll 1$ and $\chi_{2} > 1$, the X-ray emission is dominated by the shocked WR wind).

Summary
=======

In this letter we have re-examined the issue of which wind is the dominant X-ray emitter in colliding wind binaries, following the discovery of some confusion in the existing literature. Our work supports the earlier conclusions in Luo ([@LMM1990]) and Myasnikov & Zhekov ([@MZ1993]), though is sometimes in disagreement with the relevant analytical equations in Usov ([@U1992]).

For systems near the radiative limit (typically short period binaries), we find that the primary influence on $L_{1}/L_{2}$ is the ratio of the wind speeds, $v_{1}/v_{2}$, since it controls the energy flux ratio. For $v_{1} = v_{2}$, $L_{1} \approx L_{2}$ irrespective of the wind momentum ratio, $\eta$. When $v_{1} \neq v_{2}$, the faster wind normally dominates the luminosity, although it is unlikely to do so by more than a factor of 5. The equations in Usov ([@U1992]) predict values for $L_{1}/L_{2}$ which can be in error by up to a factor of 4.

For systems near the adiabatic limit (long-
9 
    0.0316          9 
    0.0100         24 

  : Ratio of the wind X - ray luminosities as a affair of fart momentum ratio, $ \eta$, for colliding wind system with equal, spatially invariant tip speeds, equal abundance, and near to the adiabatic limit.[]{data - label="tab: ad_lim " } 

 $ L_{1}/L_{2}$ in - between these limits { # sec: inbetween } 
 ------------------------------------- 

 Estimates of the luminosity proportion for systems where the shocked winds are in - between the limiting radiative and adiabatic case must be done on a subject - by - case basis. Somewhere in this area of parameter space, the wind which dominate the X - ray discharge must switch over from the one with the quicker pre - shock speed (radiative terminus ad quem) to the one with the slower pre - shock speed (adiabatic limit). In contrast, situation where one wind is clearly radiative and the other is closer to being adiabatic will have their ten - ray emission dominated by the former (in $ \gamma^{2}$   Velorum, where $ \chi_{1 } \ll 1 $ and $ \chi_{2 } > 1 $, the X - ray emission is dominated by the shocked WR wind). 

 Summary 
 = = = = = = = 

 In this letter we have re - analyze the issue of which wind is the prevailing ten - re emitter in colliding wind binaries, following the discovery of some confusion in the existing literature. Our work supports the early conclusions in Luo ([ @LMM1990 ]) and Myasnikov & Zhekov ([ @MZ1993 ]), though is sometimes in disagreement with the relevant analytical equations in Usov ([ @U1992 ]). 

 For systems near the radiative terminus ad quem (typically short period binaries), we find that the primary influence on $ L_{1}/L_{2}$ is the ratio of the wind amphetamine, $ v_{1}/v_{2}$, since it controls the energy flux ratio. For $ v_{1 } = v_{2}$, $ L_{1 } \approx L_{2}$ irrespective of the fart momentum ratio, $ \eta$. When $ v_{1 } \neq v_{2}$, the faster wind normally dominate the luminosity, although it is unlikely to do so by more than a factor of 5. The equality in Usov ([ @U1992 ]) predict values for $ L_{1}/L_{2}$ which can be in mistake by up to a factor of 4. 

 For organization near the adiabatic limit (long-
9
   0.0316         9
   0.0100        24

  : Rxtio of the winb X-ray numinoaities ar a function of wind momentul eatio, $\eta$, for colliding wina systems with eqyal, wpatially iibariant wind aieeds, xqual abundancex, and near to the adiabadiz pimit.[]{data-label="tab:ad_lim"}

$L_{1}/L_{2}$ in-between ehese lomlts {#sec:inbetwegn}
-------------------------------------

Estpmwtes of the luminosity ratio for systejs whert the shocked windx are in-between the limitijg rwdiative and adiabwtic cases nust ve done on a case-by-cast yasis. Somewgere in this region of parametef spaee, the wind wyicj dominates vhe X-rwy emission must swidch ovet from the one wivh tye faster pre-shock spxed (radiative limit) jo the one wnth the slower pre-shoxk speeg (adhabaguc uimjt). Ih contgasv, situationa where one wind is clearly raciwnove and the kther ys closer to being adiabatic will have thtir X-day emission dominated vy the former (in $\gammw^{2}$ Velorum, rhere $\chi_{1} \ll 1$ and $\chi_{2} > 1$, the X-ray emission is domitated cy uhc ryofked WR wind).

Summary
=======

In this letter we have re-evzmonvd the issue of wmich wind is the dpmlnsgt X-ray emittgr in colljding wind binaried, folloring rhe discodery of some confusion in the ezisting litegatuee. Our work supporcs the earlizr convlusipns in Luo ([@LMM1990]) and Myasuikov & Zhekov ([@MZ1993]), hhough is rometimes in disxgrvemett with ufe relevant analyeical equetionx in Usuv ([@U1992]).

Gor syftems near the vddiative limit (typlcalli shord period blnaries), we find that the primarb influence om $N_{1}/L_{2}$ ps the racio of the wind speqds, $v_{1}/v_{2}$, since ij controlf the energy fllx ratio. Hor $v_{1} = v_{2}$, $L_{1} \a[prox L_{2}$ irres[gctive of the wind moientym rqtio, $\etx$. When $v_{1} \neq v_{2}$, yhe fasteg cind normqlly dominates the luojnosity, althougk ut is unlikely yo ao fo bb morq than a factmr ow 5. Gne eqjations in Msox ([@U1992]) lredict values for $L_{1}/N_{2}$ whjch can be in errot ny up to q factor of 4.

For systeks near the adiabauic likit (long-
9 0.0316 9 0.0100 24 : Ratio wind luminosities as function of wind wind with equal, spatially wind speeds, equal and near to the adiabatic limit.[]{data-label="tab:ad_lim"} in-between these limits {#sec:inbetween} ------------------------------------- Estimates of the luminosity ratio for systems where shocked winds are in-between the limiting radiative and adiabatic cases must be done a basis. in region of parameter space, the wind which dominates the X-ray emission must switch over from the with the faster pre-shock speed (radiative limit) to one with the slower speed (adiabatic limit). In contrast, where wind is radiative the is closer to adiabatic will have their X-ray emission dominated by the former (in $\gamma^{2}$ Velorum, where $\chi_{1} \ll 1$ $\chi_{2} > X-ray emission dominated the WR wind). Summary this letter we have re-examined the wind is the dominant X-ray emitter in colliding binaries, following discovery of some confusion in the literature. Our work supports the earlier conclusions in ([@LMM1990]) and Myasnikov & Zhekov ([@MZ1993]), though is sometimes in disagreement with the relevant analytical Usov ([@U1992]). For systems the radiative limit short binaries), find the primary on $L_{1}/L_{2}$ is the ratio of the wind speeds, $v_{1}/v_{2}$, since controls the energy flux ratio. For $v_{1} = v_{2}$, $L_{1} irrespective the wind momentum $\eta$. When $v_{1} \neq the wind normally dominates the it unlikely by than factor of 5. The in Usov ([@U1992]) predict values $L_{1}/L_{2}$ which can be a factor of 4. For systems near the limit (long-
9
   0.0316         9
   0.0100        24

  : Ratio of the wind X-ray luminosIties as a fuNctioN of WinD mOmenTum rAtio, $\eta$, for collIDing Wind systems with equal, spAtialLy INvarIAnT wind Speeds, eQUaL ABunDaNcEs, aNd NEaR to thE adIabatic Limit.[]{data-lAbeL="tAb:ad_lim"}

$L_{1}/L_{2}$ in-bETwEen these liMitS {#sec:inbetweeN}
-------------------------------------

EsTimateS oF thE LuminOsiTy ratIo for sYStems wHere the shOcKEd windS Are in-beTWEeN the Limiting radiative ANd ADiabatic cases mUst be dOnE On A CAse-By-cAse basis. SoMeWhere IN this reGIoN OF ParAMeter space, the Wind which doMInaTes the x-rAy eMIssion Must sWiTCh oVer from the oNe wiTh the fastEr pre-sHOck speeD (RadiatiVe limiT) to The One wITh ThE slOwER prE-ShOck SPeeD (adiabatIc LiMit). In ContRAST, SituAtiOns wHere oNe wind is clearLy rAdiaTIve And thE otheR is cLoSer to Being aDiabaTiC will have their X-Ray eMission doMinAtEd bY tHe forMEr (in $\gaMma^{2}$ velOrum, wheRe $\chi_{1} \ll 1$ ANd $\cHi_{2} > 1$, THE x-rAy emission is dominaTeD BY tHe shockeD WR winD).

suMmARy
=======

In this LeTteR we hAVE re-exAminED tHe issue oF which WInD iS the domInAnt X-raY eMitTer In colLIdinG wind bInaries, fOllowINg the discovery OF some confusioN In THE eXIstiNg lIterature. OuR worK SuppOrts THe EarLIer coNclusIoNS iN luo ([@LMM1990]) and Myasnikov & ZHeKov ([@MZ1993]), tHough Is sometimes in DisagreemeNT WIth the reLevaNT aNAlytical equatiOns in usov ([@U1992]).

For sySTems near The raDiative lImit (typicALLy short pEriOd bInaRieS), WE fInd that the priMARy inFlUence on $l_{1}/L_{2}$ iS the ratIo oF thE wiNd sPeEds, $v_{1}/v_{2}$, sincE it contrOlS tHe EnErgY flux RAtio. For $v_{1} = V_{2}$, $L_{1} \AppRoX L_{2}$ iRrespECtive oF the wInd mOmEnTUm rAtio, $\eta$. wHeN $V_{1} \Neq v_{2}$, ThE fAsteR wiNd NormaLly dOMinAtes the LuminositY, alTHougH iT iS unlikeLy to do so by morE tHan a factor Of 5. the EquatiONS in Usov ([@U1992]) Predict values for $L_{1}/L_{2}$ which CAn be in eRroR by up To a fActor of 4.

FoR syStems nEar THe adiaBatic lImit (lOnG-
9
   0.0316         9
   0 .0100       24 

 :Ra tioof t he wind X-rayl umin osities as a functionof wi nd mome n tu m rat io, $\e t a$ , for  c ol lid in g  w ind s yst ems wit h equal, s pat ia lly invarian t  w ind speeds , e qual abundan ces , andne art o the  ad iabat ic lim i t.[]{d ata-label =" t ab:ad_ l im"}

$ L _ {1 }/L_ {2}$ in-between t h es e  limits {#sec: inbetw ee n }- - --- --- ---------- -- ----- - ------- - -- - Est i mates of theluminosityr ati o forsy ste m s wher e the  s h ock ed winds ar e in -betweenthe li m iting r a diative  and a dia bat ic c a se smus tb e d o ne  on a c ase-by-c as ebasis . So m e w h ereinthis  regi on of paramet erspac e , t he wi nd wh ichdo minat es the  X-ra yemission must s witc h over fr omth e o ne  with the fa ste r p re-shoc k speed (ra di a t i ve  limit) to the one  w i t hthe slow er pre - sh oc k  speed ( ad iab atic l imit) . In co ntrast,situat i on swhere o ne  windis  cl ear ly ra d iati ve and  the oth er is closer to bein g  adiabatic wi l lh a ve thei r X -ray emissi on d o mina tedb ythe forme r (in  $ \ ga m ma^{2}$ Velorum, wh er e $\ch i_{1}  \ll 1$ and $ \chi_{2} > 1 $ , the X- raye mi s sion is domina ted b y the shoc k ed WR wi nd).
Summary 
=======I n this l ett erwehav e re -examined the i ssue  o f which  wi nd is t hedom ina ntX- ray emitt er in co ll id in gwin d bin a ries, fo ll owi ng  th e dis c overyof so me c on fu s ion  in the ex i s ting  l it erat ure .Our w orks upp orts th e earlier  co n clus io ns  in Luo  ([@LMM1990])  a nd Myasnik ov  &Zhekov ( [@MZ1993 ]), though is sometimes in disa gre ement  wit h the rel eva nt ana lyt i cal eq uation s inUs ov( [ @U199 2 ] ). 

F or  systems n e a r t he ra di ativ e limit  (typically shortp eri od binaries),  we  fin d th att he pri ma r y i n f luence on $L_{1 }/L_{2}$ i st he  ratio oft hewi nd spee ds, $v_ {1}/v _ {2}$, s ince it c ontrols t he  ene r g y f lux ratio.  For $v_ {1} = v_{ 2 }$, $ L _{ 1} \a ppr ox L_{ 2} $ i rresp ective ofthe w ind mo me ntum r atio,  $ \eta$. W hen $v_{1} \neq v_{2}$,  the f aster  wi nd normal lyd omi nates the  lum inosity, a lth oug h itisu nlike ly t o  d o s o  by m oret han a fac t or  of 5 .The equatio n s inUsov([@ U 1992])  pre dict values for $ L _{1}/L_{2}$ wh ichc a n b e i n  err or  by up to a fa cto ro f  4.

For  s ystems near  the adi ab a tic l imit ( long-
9
 _ 0.0316_   _ __ 9
__ 0.0100 _  _   24

_ : Ratio_of_the wind X-ray luminosities as a function of wind momentum ratio, $\eta$, for colliding_wind_systems with_equal,_spatially_invariant wind speeds, equal abundances,_and near to the adiabatic_limit.[]{data-label="tab:ad_lim"}

$L_{1}/L_{2}$ in-between_these limits {#sec:inbetween}
-------------------------------------

Estimates of the luminosity ratio for_systems_where the shocked_winds are in-between the limiting radiative and adiabatic cases_must be done on a case-by-case_basis. Somewhere in_this_region_of parameter space, the_wind which dominates the X-ray emission_must switch over from the one_with the faster pre-shock speed (radiative limit)_to the one with the slower_pre-shock speed (adiabatic limit). In_contrast, situations_where one wind is clearly_radiative and the_other is_closer to being_adiabatic will have their X-ray emission_dominated by the_former (in $\gamma^{2}$ Velorum, where $\chi_{1} \ll_1$_and $\chi_{2} >_1$,_the_X-ray emission_is dominated by_the_shocked WR_wind).

Summary
=======

In_this letter we have re-examined the_issue_of which wind is the dominant X-ray_emitter in colliding wind_binaries,_following the discovery of_some confusion in the existing_literature. Our work supports the earlier_conclusions in_Luo ([@LMM1990])_and Myasnikov & Zhekov ([@MZ1993]), though is sometimes in disagreement with_the relevant analytical equations in Usov_([@U1992]).

For systems near the_radiative limit_(typically_short period binaries),_we_find that_the primary influence on $L_{1}/L_{2}$ is the_ratio of_the wind speeds, $v_{1}/v_{2}$, since it_controls the energy flux_ratio._For $v_{1} = v_{2}$, $L_{1} \approx_L_{2}$ irrespective of the wind momentum_ratio, $\eta$. When $v_{1} \neq_v_{2}$,_the_faster wind normally dominates the_luminosity, although it is unlikely to_do so by_more than a factor of 5. The_equations_in Usov ([@U1992]) predict values for_$L_{1}/L_{2}$_which can be in error by_up_to_a factor of 4.

For systems_near the adiabatic limit (long-