0)^2 - \xi(r)^2}} \exp\left[-{\nu^2 \sigma^2 \over
\xi(0)+ \xi(r)}\right],$$

where $\epsilon << \nu$ and $\sigma^2$ is the variance of the Gaussian fluctuations (Kaiser 1984). Recall $\xi(0) = \sigma^2$ and that this assumption of Gaussian fluctuations ignores the non-linear evolution of the density field. As the probability of finding a single peak within the sphere, $P_1$ is $(\epsilon/\sqrt{2\pi}\sigma) \exp(-\nu^2/2)$, the correlation of peaks of amplitude $\nu$ is

$$\xi_\nu(r) = {P_2 \over P_1^2} -1 = {\xi(0)^2
\over \sqrt{\xi(0)^2 - \xi(r)^2}} \exp\left[{\nu^2 \xi(r) \over \xi(0) + \xi(r)
}\right] - 1$$

At large separation, where $\xi(r) << \xi(0)$, then

$$\label{correlation}
    \xi_\nu(r) = {\nu^2 \over \sigma^2} \xi(r)$$

Thus, the proportionality between fluctuation amplitude and correlation strength is expected not only for the high amplitude peaks that form clusters (Kaiser 1984), but for all collapsed objects. Equations \[correlation\] and \[sigma\_delta\] predict that LSBs are less correlated than HSBs, consistent with the Mo, McGaugh, & Bothun (1994) analysis of observed LSB and HSB samples. Further evidence of this reduced correlation may be manifested in weak correlation of faint galaxies (Koo & Szalay 1984, Stevenson et al. 1985, Efstathiou et al. 1991, Pritchett & Infante 1992, Bernstein et al. 1993), given that the deep observations are more sensitive to LSBs than local surveys (Phillips, Davies, & Disney 1990, McGaugh 1994, Ferguson & McGaugh 1995).

The relationship between ${\bar\Sigma}$ and $\delta$ given in equation \[sigma\_delta\] also explains why differences in the correlation function of LSB’s and HSB’s have only recently become apparent with the development of new samples of truly low-
0)^2 - \xi(r)^2 } } \exp\left[-{\nu^2 \sigma^2 \over 
 \xi(0)+ \xi(r)}\right],$$ 

 where $ \epsilon < < \nu$ and $ \sigma^2 $ is the variance of the Gaussian fluctuations (Kaiser 1984). Recall $ \xi(0) = \sigma^2 $ and that this assumption of Gaussian fluctuation ignore the non - linear evolution of the density discipline. As the probability of finding a single point within the celestial sphere, $ P_1 $ is $ (\epsilon/\sqrt{2\pi}\sigma) \exp(-\nu^2/2)$, the correlation of extremum of amplitude $ \nu$ is 

 $ $ \xi_\nu(r) = { P_2 \over P_1 ^ 2 } -1 = { \xi(0)^2 
 \over \sqrt{\xi(0)^2 - \xi(r)^2 } } \exp\left[{\nu^2 \xi(r) \over \xi(0) + \xi(r) 
 } \right ] - 1$$ 

 At large separation, where $ \xi(r) < < \xi(0)$, then 

 $ $ \label{correlation } 
     \xi_\nu(r) = { \nu^2 \over \sigma^2 } \xi(r)$$ 

 therefore, the proportionality between fluctuation amplitude and correlation strength is expect not only for the eminent amplitude peaks that form bunch (Kaiser 1984), but for all collapsed objects. Equations   \[correlation\ ] and   \[sigma\_delta\ ] bode that LSBs are less correlated than HSBs, consistent with the Mo, McGaugh, & Bothun (1994) analysis of observed LSB and HSB samples. Further evidence of this boil down correlation may be manifested in weak correlation of faint galaxy (Koo & Szalay 1984, Stevenson et al.   1985, Efstathiou et al.   1991, Pritchett & Infante 1992, Bernstein et al.   1993), given that the deep observations are more sensitive to LSBs than local surveys (Phillips, Davies, & Disney 1990, McGaugh 1994, Ferguson & McGaugh 1995). 

 The relationship between $ { \bar\Sigma}$ and $ \delta$ given in equation   \[sigma\_delta\ ] also explains why differences in the correlation function of LSB ’s and HSB ’s have only recently become apparent with the development of new samples of rightfully low-
0)^2 - \xl(r)^2}} \exp\left[-{\nu^2 \sigma^2 \over
\xl(0)+ \xi(r)}\right],$$

where $\gpwilon << \nu$ ans $\sigma^2$ ks the variance of the Gaussman dluctyations (Kaiser 1984). Recall $\xi(0) = \sigmw^2$ and thqt tiis assumption oh Gaussian fludbuatimis ignores the kon-linear eeolution of tha aeusity field. As the probability of figding a slngle peak witrin uhe sphsge, $P_1$ is $(\epsilon/\sqrt{2\pi}\sigma) \exp(-\nh^2/2)$, the cmrrelation of peaks of amplitude $\nu$ is

$$\xl_\nu(r) = {P_2 \over P_1^2} -1 = {\xi(0)^2
\oveg \sqrt{\xi(0)^2 - \xu(r)^2}} \evp\left[{\nu^2 \xi(r) \uver \xi(0) + \xp(x)
}\right] - 1$$

At marge separation, where $\xi(r) << \xi(0)$, ghen

$$\lcbel{correlajnin}
    \xi_\nu(r) = {\nu^2 \over \sigma^2} \xi(r)$$

Thmx, the [roportoonality betwecn flnctuqtion amplitude and cmrrelation strengtr is expewtzd not only for the hugy ampnituge pdqks thzt fkrm clkstxrs (Kaiser 1984), but for alo collapsed objects. Ezlstions \[correlztion\] wnq \[sigma\_delta\] predict that LSBs are less borrslated than HSBs, consisrent with the Mo, McGaogh, & Bothug (1994) analysis of observed LSB and HSB samples. Furthar evmddnct if thkw geduced correlation may be manifested in weak dotrvlation of faint nalaxies (Koo & Szalsy 1984, Xjevenson et al. 1985, Efstacgiku et al. 1991, Pritchett & Infanje 1992, Beenstein eu al. 1993), biven that the deep observarions are moge swnsitive to LSBs tkan local suxveys (Khillils, Davies, & Disney 1990, McGabgh 1994, Fsrguson & McHaugh 1995).

The felationship betdeek ${\bdr\Sigma}$ and $\delta$ given in equation \[wigmc\_delta\] auso gxplainf why difffrenccv in the correlatiln fuuctiot of LSB’s wnd HSB’s have only recently become apparent wotv tve develjpmenb of new samplef of truly low-
0)^2 - \xi(r)^2}} \exp\left[-{\nu^2 \sigma^2 \over \xi(0)+ $\epsilon \nu$ and is the variance 1984). $\xi(0) = \sigma^2$ that this assumption Gaussian fluctuations ignores the non-linear evolution the density field. As the probability of finding a single peak within the $P_1$ is $(\epsilon/\sqrt{2\pi}\sigma) \exp(-\nu^2/2)$, the correlation of peaks of amplitude $\nu$ is $$\xi_\nu(r) {P_2 P_1^2} = \over \sqrt{\xi(0)^2 - \xi(r)^2}} \exp\left[{\nu^2 \xi(r) \over \xi(0) + \xi(r) }\right] - 1$$ At large separation, $\xi(r) << \xi(0)$, then $$\label{correlation} \xi_\nu(r) = {\nu^2 \sigma^2} \xi(r)$$ Thus, the between fluctuation amplitude and correlation is not only the amplitude that form clusters 1984), but for all collapsed objects. Equations \[correlation\] and \[sigma\_delta\] predict that LSBs are less correlated than consistent with McGaugh, & (1994) of LSB and HSB evidence of this reduced correlation may weak correlation of faint galaxies (Koo & Szalay Stevenson et 1985, Efstathiou et al. 1991, Pritchett Infante 1992, Bernstein et al. 1993), given that deep observations are more sensitive to LSBs than local surveys (Phillips, Davies, & Disney 1990, Ferguson & McGaugh 1995). relationship between ${\bar\Sigma}$ $\delta$ in \[sigma\_delta\] explains why in the correlation function of LSB’s and HSB’s have only recently apparent with the development of new samples of truly low-
0)^2 - \xi(r)^2}} \exp\left[-{\nu^2 \sigma^2 \over
\xi(0)+ \xi(R)}\right],$$

wherE $\epsiLon << \Nu$ aNd $\SigmA^2$ is tHe variance of thE gausSian fluctuations (Kaiser 1984). recalL $\xI(0) = \SigmA^2$ AnD that This assUMpTIOn oF GAuSsiAn FLuCtuatIonS ignoreS the non-linEar EvOlution of the DEnSity field. AS thE probability Of fInding A sIngLE peak WitHin thE spherE, $p_1$ is $(\epsIlon/\sqrt{2\pI}\sIGma) \exp(-\NU^2/2)$, the corRELaTion Of peaks of amplitudE $\Nu$ IS

$$\xi_\nu(r) = {P_2 \over P_1^2} -1 = {\xi(0)^2
\Over \sqRt{\XI(0)^2 - \xI(R)^2}} \Exp\LefT[{\nu^2 \xi(r) \over \Xi(0) + \Xi(r)
}\riGHt] - 1$$

At larGE sEPARatIOn, where $\xi(r) << \xi(0)$, tHen

$$\label{corRElaTion}
    \xi_\Nu(R) = {\nu^2 \OVer \sigMa^2} \xi(r)$$

thUS, thE proportionAlitY between fLuctuaTIon amplITude and CorrelAtiOn sTrenGTh Is ExpEcTEd nOT oNly FOr tHe high amPlItUde peAks tHAT FOrm cLusTers (kaiseR 1984), but for all colLapSed oBJecTs. EquAtionS \[corReLatioN\] and \[siGma\_deLtA\] predict that LSBS are Less correLatEd ThaN HsBs, coNSistenT wiTh tHe Mo, McGAugh, & BotHUn (1994) aNaLYSIs Of observed LSB and HSb sAMPlEs. FurtheR evideNCe Of THis reducEd CorRelaTIOn may Be maNIfEsted in wEak corRElAtIon of faInT galaxIeS (KoO & SzAlay 1984, STEvenSon et aL. 1985, EfstathIou et AL. 1991, Pritchett & InfaNTe 1992, Bernstein et AL. 1993), gIVEn THat tHe dEep observatIons ARe moRe seNSiTivE To LSBS than LoCAl SUrveys (Phillips, DavieS, & DIsney 1990, MCGaugH 1994, Ferguson & McGaUgh 1995).

The relaTIONship betWeen ${\BAr\sIgma}$ and $\delta$ giVen in Equation \[siGMa\_delta\] aLso exPlains whY differenCES in the coRreLatIon FunCTIoN of LSB’s and HSB’S HAve oNlY recentLy bEcome apParEnt WitH thE dEvelopmenT of new saMpLeS oF tRulY low-
0)^2 - \xi(r)^2}} \exp\lef t[-{\nu^2\sigm a^2  \o ve r
\x i(0) + \xi(r)}\righ t ],$$ 

where $\epsilon << \ nu$ a nd $\si g ma ^2$ i s the v a ri a n ceof  t heGa u ss ian f luc tuation s (Kaiser198 4) . Recall $\x i (0 ) = \sigma ^2$  and that th isassump ti ono f Gau ssi an fl uctuat i ons ig nores the  n o n-line a r evolu t i on  ofthe density field .  A s  the probabili ty offi n di n g  asin gle peak w it hin t h e spher e ,$ P _ 1$i s $(\epsilon/ \sqrt{2\pi} \ sig ma) \e xp (-\ n u^2/2) $, th ec orr elation ofpeak s of ampl itude$ \nu$ is 
$$\xi_ \nu(r)  ={P_ 2 \o v er  P _1^ 2} -1=  { \xi ( 0)^ 2
\over\s qr t{\xi (0)^ 2 - \xi( r)^ 2}}\exp\ left[{\nu^2 \ xi( r) \ o ver  \xi( 0) +\xi( r) 
}\ri ght] -  1$$
A t large separat ion,  where $\ xi( r)  <<  \ xi(0) $ , then 

$ $\l abel{co rrelati o n} \ xi _\nu(r) = {\nu^2 \ ov e r  \ sigma^2}  \xi(r ) $$ 
T hus, the  p rop orti o n ality  bet w ee n fluctu ationa mp li tude an dcorrel at ion  st rengt h  isexpect ed not o nly f o r the high amp l itude peaks t h at f or m  clu ste rs (Kaiser1984 ) , bu t fo r  a llc ollap sed o bj e ct s . Equations \[corre la tion\]  and\[sigma\_delt a\] predic t t hat LSBs  are le s s correlated t han H SBs, consi s tent wit h the  Mo, McG augh, & B o t hun (199 4)ana lys iso f  o bserved LSB a n d  HSB  s amples.  Fu rther e vid enc e o f t hi s reduced  correla ti on  m ay  be  mani f ested in  w eak  c orr elati o n of f aintgala xi es (Ko o & Sza l ay 1 984,  S te vens onet  al.1985 ,  Ef stathio u et al.199 1 , Pr it ch ett & I nfante 1992,Be rnstein et  a l.1993), g iven tha t the deep observations are mor e s ensit iveto LSBs t han  local  su r veys ( Philli ps, D av ies , & Dis n e y199 0,  McGaugh 1 9 9 4,Fergu so n &McGaugh  1995).

The relat i ons hip between $ {\b ar\S i g ma }$a nd $\d el t a$g i ven in equation  \[sigma\_ de l ta \] also ex p lai ns  why di fferenc es in the cor relationfunctionof  LSB ’ s  an d HSB’s ha ve onlyrecentlyb ecome ap paren t w ith th edev elopm ent of new  samp les of  t ruly l ow-
0)^2 -_\xi(r)^2}} \exp\left[-{\nu^2_\sigma^2 \over
\xi(0)+ \xi(r)}\right],$$

where $\epsilon_<< \nu$_and_$\sigma^2$ is_the_variance of the_Gaussian fluctuations (Kaiser_1984). Recall $\xi(0) =_\sigma^2$ and that_this_assumption of Gaussian fluctuations ignores the non-linear evolution of the density field. As the_probability_of finding_a_single_peak within the sphere, $P_1$_is $(\epsilon/\sqrt{2\pi}\sigma) \exp(-\nu^2/2)$, the correlation_of peaks_of amplitude $\nu$ is

$$\xi_\nu(r) = {P_2 \over P_1^2}_-1_= {\xi(0)^2
\over \sqrt{\xi(0)^2_- \xi(r)^2}} \exp\left[{\nu^2 \xi(r) \over \xi(0) + \xi(r)
}\right] -_1$$

At large separation, where $\xi(r) <<_\xi(0)$, then

$$\label{correlation}
 ___\xi_\nu(r) = {\nu^2 \over_\sigma^2} \xi(r)$$

Thus, the proportionality between fluctuation_amplitude and correlation strength is expected_not only for the high amplitude peaks_that form clusters (Kaiser 1984), but_for all collapsed objects. Equations \[correlation\]_and \[sigma\_delta\] predict_that LSBs are less correlated_than HSBs, consistent_with the_Mo, McGaugh, &_Bothun (1994) analysis of observed LSB_and HSB samples._Further evidence of this reduced correlation_may_be manifested in_weak_correlation_of faint_galaxies (Koo &_Szalay_1984, Stevenson_et_al. 1985, Efstathiou et al. 1991, Pritchett &_Infante_1992, Bernstein et al. 1993), given that the_deep observations are more_sensitive_to LSBs than local_surveys (Phillips, Davies, & Disney_1990, McGaugh 1994, Ferguson & McGaugh_1995).

The relationship_between ${\bar\Sigma}$_and $\delta$ given in equation \[sigma\_delta\] also explains why differences in the_correlation function of LSB’s and HSB’s_have only recently become_apparent with_the_development of new_samples_of truly_low-