. Our way of obtaining the Kerr nonlinearity numerically agrees well with those seen in experiments [@13_Observation_Schoelkopf].

The coherence times mentioned in ref. [@07_Ultrahigh_Visentin; @13_Reaching_Schoelkopf; @18_3D_Grassellino] are for a bare cavity. But due to the hybridization of the cavity-SQ modes, the lifetimes of both the cavity and the SQ change. Since a SQ has a shorter coherence time than our desired kind of cavities, the SQ-cavity interaction will shorten the lifetime of the cavity. We therefore need to take this effect into account.

To the lowest order in $g/\Delta$, the ‘inverse-Purcell’ enhanced decay rate of the cavity $\kappa \approx (1-(g/\Delta)^2)\kappa_c+(g/\Delta)^2 \gamma$ [@07_Generating_Schoelkopf; @16_Quantum_Schoelkopf; @09_Dispersive_Blais]. Here, $g$ is the qubit-cavity coupling strength, $\Delta=\omega_q-\omega_c$ is the detuning between the cavity and the qubit, and $\kappa_c$ and $\gamma$ are the decay rates of the bare cavity and the SQ respectively. Taking the above $\kappa$, the effective coherence time of a cat state in the cavity in the presence of the two photon drive, $\kappa_{eff}$, is numerically found by fitting the evolution of coherence as a decaying exponential. It is approximately equal to $2 \kappa {\left\lvert\alpha\right\rvert}^2$, where ${\left\lvert\alpha\right\rvert}$ is the size of the coherent state.

For experimentally conceivable values of $\kappa_c$ [@07_Ultrahigh_Visentin; @13_Reaching_Schoelkopf; @18_3D_Grassellino], $\gamma$ [@19_SQs_Oliver; @12_SQ_Steffen], $g$ [@07_cQED_Schoelkopf; @13_Observation_Schoelkopf; @17_Microwave_Nori], $\Delta$ [@13_Observation_Schoelkopf; @16_Quantum_Schoelkopf], and $K_q$ [@12_
. Our way of obtaining the Kerr nonlinearity numerically agrees well with those seen in experiment [ @13_Observation_Schoelkopf ]. 

 The coherence prison term mentioned in ref.   [ @07_Ultrahigh_Visentin; @13_Reaching_Schoelkopf; @18_3D_Grassellino ] are for a bare pit. But due to the hybridization of the cavity - SQ modes, the lifetimes of both the pit and the SQ variety. Since a SQ has a shorter coherence time than our desired kind of cavities, the SQ - pit interaction will shorten the lifetime of the cavity. We therefore necessitate to take this effect into account. 

 To the lowest order in $ g/\Delta$, the ‘ inverse - Purcell ’ enhance decay rate of the cavity $ \kappa \approx (1-(g/\Delta)^2)\kappa_c+(g/\Delta)^2 \gamma$ [ @07_Generating_Schoelkopf; @16_Quantum_Schoelkopf; @09_Dispersive_Blais ]. Here, $ g$ is the qubit - cavity yoke strength, $ \Delta=\omega_q-\omega_c$ is the detuning between the cavity and the qubit, and $ \kappa_c$ and $ \gamma$ are the decay rate of the bare pit and the SQ respectively. Taking the above $ \kappa$, the effective coherence prison term of a cat state in the cavity in the bearing of the two photon drive, $ \kappa_{eff}$, is numerically found by fitting the evolution of coherence as a decaying exponential. It is approximately equal to $ 2 \kappa { \left\lvert\alpha\right\rvert}^2 $, where $ { \left\lvert\alpha\right\rvert}$ is the size of the coherent department of state. 

 For experimentally conceivable values of $ \kappa_c$ [ @07_Ultrahigh_Visentin; @13_Reaching_Schoelkopf; @18_3D_Grassellino ], $ \gamma$ [ @19_SQs_Oliver; @12_SQ_Steffen ], $ g$ [ @07_cQED_Schoelkopf; @13_Observation_Schoelkopf; @17_Microwave_Nori ], $ \Delta$ [ @13_Observation_Schoelkopf; @16_Quantum_Schoelkopf ], and $ K_q$ [ @12 _
. Oug way of obtaining the Ktrr nonlinearity uymericelly agdees welu with those seen in experimxnts [@13_Obseevation_Schoelkopf].

The cuherence nimes menriontd in ref. [@07_Ultrahigi_Bisentik; @13_Readming_Sehielkopf; @18_3D_Grassgllino] are fmr a bare cavidy. Bbt due to the hybridization of the cwvity-SQ mldes, the lifetymes jf bknh the cavity and the SQ change. Since e SQ has a shoryer coherence time than oug dedired kind of cavihies, the SQ-xaviet interactiov will shogcen the lifgtime of the cavity. We therefore need to take tyiw evxect into arcount.

No the lowest order it $g/\Delts$, the ‘inverse-Pmrceln’ ebhanced decay rate of the cavity $\kappa \wpprox (1-(g/\Dalca)^2)\kappa_c+(g/\Delta)^2 \gamma$ [@07_Teberathng_Swhoeujopw; @16_Qhaituj_Schoepko'f; @09_Dispersibe_Blais]. Herw, $g$ is the qubit-cavotr coupling strsngth, $\Qejta=\omega_q-\omega_c$ is the detuning between ths cavity and the qubit, qnd $\kappa_c$ and $\gamma$ wre the dqcay rates of the bare cavity and the SQ respectieely. Vayiny the xvoge $\kappa$, the effective coherence time of a cae suatv in the cavity ik the presence of yhf yro photon drixe, $\kap'z_{erf}$, is numerically vound bi fittung the edoluyion of coherence as a decating exponennial. It is approximatepy equal to $2 \kakpa {\legt\lvert\alpha\right\rvert}^2$, chere ${\meft\lvert\aloha\right\rbdrt}$ is the size uf nhe woherent state.

For experimegtally coiceivcble valjes pf $\kap[a_c$ [@07_Ultrahlgh_Visentin; @13_Reaching_Schoflkopy; @18_3D_Grdssellino], $\hamma$ [@19_SQs_Oliver; @12_SQ_Steffen], $g$ [@07_cQEV_Xchoelkopf; @13_Onsarvdtion_Schjelkoif; @17_Microwave_Nory], $\Delta$ [@13_Observction_Schjelkoof; @16_Quantum_Achoelkmpf], and $K_q$ [@12_
. Our way of obtaining the Kerr agrees with those in experiments [@13_Observation_Schoelkopf]. ref. @13_Reaching_Schoelkopf; @18_3D_Grassellino] are a bare cavity. due to the hybridization of the modes, the lifetimes of both the cavity and the SQ change. Since a has a shorter coherence time than our desired kind of cavities, the SQ-cavity will the of cavity. We therefore need to take this effect into account. To the lowest order in $g/\Delta$, ‘inverse-Purcell’ enhanced decay rate of the cavity $\kappa (1-(g/\Delta)^2)\kappa_c+(g/\Delta)^2 \gamma$ [@07_Generating_Schoelkopf; @16_Quantum_Schoelkopf; Here, $g$ is the qubit-cavity strength, is the between cavity the qubit, and and $\gamma$ are the decay rates of the bare cavity and the SQ respectively. Taking the above the effective of a state the in the presence two photon drive, $\kappa_{eff}$, is numerically the evolution of coherence as a decaying exponential. is approximately to $2 \kappa {\left\lvert\alpha\right\rvert}^2$, where ${\left\lvert\alpha\right\rvert}$ the size of the coherent state. For experimentally values of $\kappa_c$ [@07_Ultrahigh_Visentin; @13_Reaching_Schoelkopf; @18_3D_Grassellino], $\gamma$ [@19_SQs_Oliver; @12_SQ_Steffen], $g$ [@07_cQED_Schoelkopf; @13_Observation_Schoelkopf; @17_Microwave_Nori], $\Delta$ [@13_Observation_Schoelkopf; $K_q$ [@12_
. Our way of obtaining the Kerr nOnlinearitY numeRicAllY aGreeS welL with those seen IN expEriments [@13_Observation_SchOelkoPf].

tHe coHErEnce tImes menTIoNED in ReF. [@07_ULtrAhIGh_visenTin; @13_reachinG_SchoelkopF; @18_3D_GRaSsellino] are fOR a Bare cavity. but Due to the hybrIdiZation Of The CAvity-sQ mOdes, tHe lifeTImes of Both the caViTY and thE sQ changE. sInCe a Sq has a shorter coherENcE Time than our desIred kiNd OF cAVItiEs, tHe SQ-cavity InTeracTIon will SHoRTEN thE Lifetime of the Cavity. We theREfoRe need To TakE This efFect iNtO AccOunt.

To the loWest Order in $g/\DElta$, thE ‘Inverse-pUrcell’ eNhanceD deCay Rate OF tHe CavItY $\KapPA \aPprOX (1-(g/\DElta)^2)\kappA_c+(G/\DElta)^2 \gAmma$ [@07_gENERatiNg_SChoeLkopf; @16_quantum_SchoelKopF; @09_DisPErsIve_BlAis]. HeRe, $g$ iS tHe qubIt-caviTy couPlIng strength, $\DeltA=\omeGa_q-\omega_c$ Is tHe DetUnIng beTWeen thE caVitY and the Qubit, anD $\KapPa_C$ AND $\gAmma$ are the decay ratEs OF ThE bare cavIty and THe sQ REspectivElY. TaKing THE abovE $\kapPA$, tHe effectIve cohEReNcE time of A cAt statE iN thE caVity iN The pResencE of the twO photON drive, $\kappa_{eff}$, IS numerically fOUnD BY fITtinG thE evolution oF cohERencE as a DEcAyiNG expoNentiAl. iT iS Approximately equal tO $2 \kAppa {\leFt\lveRt\alpha\right\rVert}^2$, where ${\lEFT\Lvert\alpHa\riGHt\RVert}$ is the size oF the cOherent staTE.

For expeRimenTally conCeivable vALUes of $\kapPa_c$ [@07_ultRahIgh_vISeNtin; @13_Reaching_SCHOelkOpF; @18_3D_GrassEllIno], $\gammA$ [@19_SQS_OlIveR; @12_SQ_stEffen], $g$ [@07_cQEd_SchoelkOpF; @13_OBsErVatIon_ScHOelkopf; @17_MIcRowAvE_NoRi], $\DelTA$ [@13_ObserVatioN_SchOeLkOPf; @16_QUantum_SCHoELKopf], AnD $K_Q$ [@12_
. Our way of obtaining the  Kerr nonl inear ity  nu me rica llyagrees well wi t h th ose seen in experiment s [@1 3_ O bser v at ion_S choelko p f] . 
Th eco her en c etimes  me ntioned  in ref. [ @07 _U ltrahigh_Vis e nt in; @13_Re ach ing_Schoelko pf;  @18_3 D_ Gra s selli no]  arefor ab are ca vity. But  d u e to t h e hybri d i za tion  of the cavity-SQ mo d es, the lifeti mes of  b o th t hecav ity and th eSQ ch a nge. Si n ce a SQh as a shortercoherence t i methan o ur  de s ired k ind o fc avi ties, the S Q-ca vity inte ractio n  will s h orten t he lif eti meof t h eca vit y. Wet he ref o reneed tota ke  this  eff e c t into  ac coun t.

T o the lowestord er i n  $g /\Del ta$,the‘i nvers e-Purc ell’en hanced decay ra te o f the cav ity  $ \ka pp a \ap p rox (1 -(g /\D elta)^2 )\kappa _ c+( g/ \ D e lt a)^2 \gamma$ [@07_ Ge n e ra ting_Sch oelkop f ;@1 6 _Quantum _S cho elko p f ; @09 _Dis p er sive_Bla is]. H e re ,$g$ isth e qubi t- cav ity  coup l ingstreng th, $\De lta=\ o mega_q-\omega_ c $ is the detu n in g be t ween  th e cavity an d th e  qub it,a nd  $\ k appa_ c$ an d$ \g a mma$ are the decayra tes of  thebare cavity a nd the SQr e s pectivel y. T a ki n g the above $\ kappa $, the eff e ctive co heren ce timeof a cats t ate in t hecav ity  in t he  presence oft h e tw ophotondri ve, $\k app a_{ eff }$,  i s numeric ally fou nd  b yfi tti ng th e  evoluti on  of  c ohe rence as a d ecayi ng e xp on e nti al. Iti sa p prox im at elyequ al  to $ 2 \k a ppa  {\left \lvert\al pha \ righ t\ rv ert}^2$ , where ${\le ft \lvert\alp ha \ri ght\rv e r t}$ is t he size of the coherent state.
Fo r exp erim entally c onc eivabl e v a lues o f $\ka ppa_c $[@0 7 _ Ultra h i gh _Vi se ntin; @13_ R e ach ing_S ch oelk opf; @1 8_3D_Grassellino], $\g amma$ [@19_SQ s_O live r ;  @ 12_ S Q_ S tef fe n ],$ g $ [@07_cQED_Sch oelkopf; @ 13 _ Ob servation_ S cho el kopf; @ 17_Micr owave _ Nori],$\Delta$[@13_Obse rv atio n _ Sch oelkopf; @ 16_Quant um_Schoel k opf], an d $K_ q$[@12_
. Our_way of_obtaining the Kerr nonlinearity_numerically agrees_well_with those_seen_in experiments [@13_Observation_Schoelkopf].

The_coherence times mentioned_in ref. [@07_Ultrahigh_Visentin; @13_Reaching_Schoelkopf; @18_3D_Grassellino]_are for a_bare_cavity. But due to the hybridization of the cavity-SQ modes, the lifetimes of both_the_cavity and_the_SQ_change. Since a SQ has_a shorter coherence time than_our desired_kind of cavities, the SQ-cavity interaction will shorten_the_lifetime of the_cavity. We therefore need to take this effect into_account.

To the lowest order in $g/\Delta$,_the ‘inverse-Purcell’ enhanced_decay_rate_of the cavity $\kappa_\approx (1-(g/\Delta)^2)\kappa_c+(g/\Delta)^2 \gamma$ [@07_Generating_Schoelkopf; @16_Quantum_Schoelkopf; @09_Dispersive_Blais]._Here, $g$ is the qubit-cavity coupling_strength, $\Delta=\omega_q-\omega_c$ is the detuning between the_cavity and the qubit, and $\kappa_c$_and $\gamma$ are the decay_rates of_the bare cavity and the_SQ respectively. Taking_the above_$\kappa$, the effective_coherence time of a cat state_in the cavity_in the presence of the two_photon_drive, $\kappa_{eff}$, is_numerically_found_by fitting_the evolution of_coherence_as a_decaying_exponential. It is approximately equal to_$2_\kappa {\left\lvert\alpha\right\rvert}^2$, where ${\left\lvert\alpha\right\rvert}$ is the size_of the coherent state.

For_experimentally_conceivable values of $\kappa_c$_[@07_Ultrahigh_Visentin; @13_Reaching_Schoelkopf; @18_3D_Grassellino], $\gamma$ [@19_SQs_Oliver;_@12_SQ_Steffen], $g$ [@07_cQED_Schoelkopf; @13_Observation_Schoelkopf; @17_Microwave_Nori], $\Delta$_[@13_Observation_Schoelkopf; @16_Quantum_Schoelkopf],_and $K_q$_[@12_