|\,,$$ we may write $$[\,f\,]_* =\,\int_0^R  \,\sup_{ \,x \in\,{{\overline{\Omega}}}}\, {{\omega}}_f(x;\,r)\,
\,\frac{dr}{r}\,.\label{catriz}$$ So, together with $\,C_*({{\overline{\Omega}}})\,,$ we have considered a functional space $\,B_*({{\overline{\Omega}}})\,$ obtained by commuting *integral* and *sup* operators in the right hand side of definition : For each $\,f \in\,C({{\overline{\Omega}}})\,,$ we defined the semi-norm $$\langle\,f\,\rangle_* = \,\sup_{ \,x \in\,{{\overline{\Omega}}}}\, \int_0^R \,
{{\omega}}_f(x;\,r)\,
\,\frac{dr}{r}\,,\label{seis-bis}$$ and a related functional space$\, B_*({{\overline{\Omega}}})\,.$ We have shown that the inclusion $ \,C_*({{\overline{\Omega}}}) \subset\,B_*({{\overline{\Omega}}})\,$ is proper, by constructing strongly oscillating functions which belong to $\,B_*({{\overline{\Omega}}})\,$ but not to $\,C_*({{\overline{\Omega}}})\,.$ This construction was recently published in reference [@BV-LMS], Proposition 1.7.1. Furthermore, in \[BVUN\], we have shown that Theorem \[laplaces\] and similar results hold in a weaker form, for data $\,f
\in\,B_*({{\overline{\Omega}}})\,$, by proving that the first order derivatives of the solution $\,u\,$ are Lipschitz continuous in $\,{{\overline{\Omega}}}\,.$ The proof is published in reference [@BV-LMS], actually for data in a functional space $\,D_*({{\overline{\Omega}}})\,$ containing $\,B_*({{\overline{\Omega}}})\,$. See Theorem 1.3.1 in [@BV-LMS]. A similar extension holds for the Stokes problem, as shown in reference [@BVJP], Theorem 6.1, where we have proved that if $\,{\boldsymbol{f}}\in \,{\boldsymbol{D}}_*({{\overline{\Omega}}})\,,$ then the solution $\,({\boldsymbol{u}},\,p)\,$ of problem satisfies the estimate $\, \|\,{\boldsymbol{u}}\,\|_{1,\,1}+\,\|\,p\,\|_{0,\,
|\,,$$ we may write $ $ [ \,f\, ] _ * = \,\int_0^R   \,\sup _ { \,x \in\,{{\overline{\Omega}}}}\, { { \omega}}_f(x;\,r)\, 
 \,\frac{dr}{r}\,.\label{catriz}$$ So, together with $ \,C_*({{\overline{\Omega}}})\,,$ we have considered a running quad $ \,B_*({{\overline{\Omega}}})\,$ obtained by commuting * built-in * and * sup * hustler in the right hired hand side of definition: For each $ \,f \in\,C({{\overline{\Omega}}})\,,$ we defined the semifinal - norm $ $ \langle\,f\,\rangle _ * = \,\sup _ { \,x \in\,{{\overline{\Omega}}}}\, \int_0^R \, 
 { { \omega}}_f(x;\,r)\, 
 \,\frac{dr}{r}\,,\label{seis - bis}$$ and a related functional space$\, B_*({{\overline{\Omega}}})\,.$ We have shown that the inclusion body $ \,C_*({{\overline{\Omega } } }) \subset\,B_*({{\overline{\Omega}}})\,$ is proper, by constructing strongly oscillating functions which belong to to $ \,B_*({{\overline{\Omega}}})\,$ but not to $ \,C_*({{\overline{\Omega}}})\,.$ This construction was recently published in reference point [ @BV - LMS ], Proposition 1.7.1. Furthermore, in \[BVUN\ ], we have shown that Theorem \[laplaces\ ] and alike results hold in a weaker shape, for data $ \,f 
 \in\,B_*({{\overline{\Omega}}})\,$, by proving that the first order derived function of the solution $ \,u\,$ are Lipschitz continuous in $ \,{{\overline{\Omega}}}\,.$ The proof is published in reference [ @BV - LMS ], actually for data in a functional quad $ \,D_*({{\overline{\Omega}}})\,$ containing $ \,B_*({{\overline{\Omega}}})\,$. See Theorem 1.3.1 in [ @BV - LMS ]. A similar extension holds for the Stokes problem, as shown in reference [ @BVJP ], Theorem 6.1, where we have proved that if $ \,{\boldsymbol{f}}\in \,{\boldsymbol{D}}_*({{\overline{\Omega}}})\,,$ then the solution $ \,({\boldsymbol{u}},\,p)\,$ of problem satisfies the estimate $ \, \|\,{\boldsymbol{u}}\,\|_{1,\,1}+\,\|\,p\,\|_{0,\,
|\,,$$ we may write $$[\,f\,]_* =\,\int_0^R  \,\sup_{ \,x \in\,{{\overline{\Omegc}}}}\, {{\omega}}_h(x;\,r)\,
\,\frac{sr}{r}\,.\label{zatriz}$$ So, together with $\,C_*({{\oveclinw{\Omegq}}})\,,$ we have considered a functionwl space $\,B_*({{\ovtrline{\Omega}}})\,$ obtaiisd by commutihn *intzgcal* and *sup* opetators in tha right hand shdd lf definition : For each $\,f \in\,C({{\overlige{\Omega}}})\,,$ wf defined the femi-mjrm $$\mangle\,f\,\rangle_* = \,\sup_{ \,x \in\,{{\overline{\Omefa}}}}\, \int_0^R \,
{{\omega}}_f(x;\,r)\,
\,\frac{cr}{r}\,,\label{seis-bis}$$ and a relahed vunctional space$\, B_*({{\lverline{\Ometa}}})\,.$ Wq have shown ghat the inclusion $ \,C_*({{\oberline{\Omega}}}) \subset\,B_*({{\overline{\Omeea}}})\,$ is proper, by cinshtucting stroigly ofcillating fmmctionv which belong to $\,B_*({{\ovcrlinx{\Ometa}}})\,$ but not to $\,C_*({{\overliie{\Omega}}})\,.$ This construstion was rzcently published in eederenwe [@BE-LMS], Prooosjtmon 1.7.1. Furtjerjore, in \[BVHN\], we have whown that Theorem \[ka[oaces\] and simjlar rqstlts hold in a weaker form, for data $\,f
\in\,T_*({{\ovsrline{\Omega}}})\,$, by proving rhat the first order ferivativqs of the solution $\,u\,$ are Lipschitz continuous in $\,{{\mverlmnd{\Omtgq}}}\,.$ The prlof is published in reference [@BV-LMS], actually skr dsta in a functlonal space $\,D_*({{\overlonf{\Okgga}}})\,$ containing $\,B_*({{\overlins{\Omega}}})\,$. See Theorem 1.3.1 in [@BV-JMS]. A similar txtenxion holds for the Stokes peoblem, as shjqn in reference [@BVLP], Theorem 6.1, chere ee hafe proved that if $\,{\boldsvmbol{f}}\jn \,{\boldsymbll{D}}_*({{\overlihd{\Omega}}})\,,$ then the rolltiot $\,({\boldsymbol{u}},\,p)\,$ of problem fatisfies the estimage $\, \|\,{\noldsyibol{u}}\,\|_{1,\,1}+\,\|\,p\,\|_{0,\,
|\,,$$ we may write $$[\,f\,]_* =\,\int_0^R \,\sup_{ {{\omega}}_f(x;\,r)\, So, together $\,C_*({{\overline{\Omega}}})\,,$ we have obtained commuting *integral* and operators in the hand side of definition : For $\,f \in\,C({{\overline{\Omega}}})\,,$ we defined the semi-norm $$\langle\,f\,\rangle_* = \,\sup_{ \,x \in\,{{\overline{\Omega}}}}\, \int_0^R \, \,\frac{dr}{r}\,,\label{seis-bis}$$ and a related functional space$\, B_*({{\overline{\Omega}}})\,.$ We have shown that the inclusion \,C_*({{\overline{\Omega}}}) is by strongly oscillating functions which belong to $\,B_*({{\overline{\Omega}}})\,$ but not to $\,C_*({{\overline{\Omega}}})\,.$ This construction was recently published reference [@BV-LMS], Proposition 1.7.1. Furthermore, in \[BVUN\], we shown that Theorem \[laplaces\] similar results hold in a form, data $\,f by that first order derivatives the solution $\,u\,$ are Lipschitz continuous in $\,{{\overline{\Omega}}}\,.$ The proof is published in reference [@BV-LMS], actually for in a $\,D_*({{\overline{\Omega}}})\,$ containing See 1.3.1 [@BV-LMS]. A similar for the Stokes problem, as shown Theorem 6.1, where we have proved that if \,{\boldsymbol{D}}_*({{\overline{\Omega}}})\,,$ then solution $\,({\boldsymbol{u}},\,p)\,$ of problem satisfies the $\, \|\,{\boldsymbol{u}}\,\|_{1,\,1}+\,\|\,p\,\|_{0,\,
|\,,$$ we may write $$[\,f\,]_* =\,\int_0^R  \,\sup_{ \,x \in\,{{\overLine{\Omega}}}}\, {{\oMega}}_f(X;\,r)\,
\,\fRac{Dr}{R}\,.\labEl{caTriz}$$ So, together WIth $\,C_*({{\Overline{\Omega}}})\,,$ we have conSiderEd A FuncTIoNal spAce $\,B_*({{\oveRLiNE{\omeGa}}})\,$ ObTaiNeD By CommuTinG *integrAl* and *sup* opEraToRs in the right HAnD side of defIniTion : For each $\,f \In\,C({{\OverliNe{\omeGA}}})\,,$ we deFinEd the Semi-noRM $$\langlE\,f\,\rangle_* = \,\sUp_{ \,X \In\,{{\overLIne{\OmegA}}}}\, \INt_0^r \,
{{\omeGa}}_f(x;\,r)\,
\,\frac{dr}{r}\,,\label{SEiS-Bis}$$ and a related FunctiOnAL sPACe$\, B_*({{\OveRline{\Omega}}})\,.$ we Have sHOwn that THe INCLusIOn $ \,C_*({{\overline{\OmEga}}}) \subset\,B_*({{\oVErlIne{\OmeGa}}})\,$ Is pROper, by ConstRuCTinG strongly osCillAting funcTions wHIch beloNG to $\,B_*({{\oveRline{\OMegA}}})\,$ buT not TO $\,C_*({{\OvErlInE{\omeGA}}})\,.$ THis COnsTruction WaS rEcentLy puBLISHed iN reFereNce [@BV-lMS], PropositioN 1.7.1. FuRtheRMorE, in \[BVuN\], we hAve sHoWn thaT TheorEm \[lapLaCes\] and similar reSultS hold in a wEakEr ForM, fOr datA $\,F
\in\,B_*({{\ovErlIne{\omega}}})\,$, by Proving THat ThE FIRsT order derivatives oF tHE SoLution $\,u\,$ aRe LipsCHiTz COntinuouS iN $\,{{\ovErliNE{\omega}}}\,.$ the pROoF is publiShed in REfErEnce [@BV-LmS], ActualLy For DatA in a fUNctiOnal spAce $\,D_*({{\overLine{\OMEga}}})\,$ containing $\,B_*({{\OVerline{\Omega}}})\,$. SEE THEOrEM 1.3.1 in [@Bv-LMs]. A similar exTensIOn hoLds fOR tHe STOkes pRobleM, aS ShOWn in reference [@BVJP], ThEoRem 6.1, wheRe we hAve proved that If $\,{\boldsymbOL{F}}\In \,{\boldsyMbol{d}}_*({{\OvERline{\Omega}}})\,,$ then The soLution $\,({\boldSYmbol{u}},\,p)\,$ oF probLem satisFies the esTIMate $\, \|\,{\boldSymBol{U}}\,\|_{1,\,1}+\,\|\,p\,\|_{0,\,
|\,,$$ we may write $$[\,f \,]_* =\,\ int_0 ^R \, \s up_{  \,x  \in\,{{\overl i ne{\ Omega}}}}\, {{\omega}} _f(x; \, r )\,\ ,\ frac{ dr}{r}\ , .\ l a bel {c at riz }$ $  S o, to get her wit h $\,C_*({ {\o ve rline{\Omega } }} )\,,$ we h ave  considereda f unctio na l s p ace $ \,B _*({{ \overl i ne{\Om ega}}})\, $o btaine d  by com m u ti ng * integral* and *su p *o perators in th e righ th an d sid e o f definiti on  : Fo r  each $ \ ,f \ i n\, C ({{\overline{ \Omega}}})\ , ,$we def in edt he sem i-nor m$ $\l angle\,f\,\ rang le_* = \, \sup_{ \,x \in \ ,{{\ove rline{ \Om ega }}}} \ ,\i nt_ 0^ R  \, {{ \om e ga} }_f(x;\, r) \, 
\,\f rac{ d r } { r}\, ,\l abel {seis -bis}$$ and a  re late d  fu nctio nal s pace $\ , B_* ({{\ov erlin e{ \Omega}}})\,.$We h ave shown  th at  th einclu s ion $\,C _*( {{\over line{\O m ega }} } ) \s ubset\,B_*({{\over li n e {\ Omega}}} )\,$ i s  p ro p er, by c on str ucti n g  stro ngly os cillatin g func t io ns  whichbe long t o$\, B_* ({{\o v erli ne{\Om ega}}})\ ,$ bu t  not to $\,C_* ( {{\overline{\ O me g a }} } )\,. $ T his constru ctio n  was  rec e nt lyp ublis hed i nr ef e rence [@BV-LMS], Pr op ositio n 1.7 .1. Furthermo re, in \[B V U N \], we h aves ho w n that Theorem  \[la places\] a n d simila r res ults hol d in a we a k er form,  fo r d ata  $\ , f 
\ in\,B_*({{\ov e r line {\ Omega}} })\ ,$, bypro vin g t hat  t he firstorder de ri va ti ve s o f the solution  $ \,u \, $ a re Li p schitz  cont inuo us  i n  $\ ,{{\ove r li n e {\Om eg a} }}\, .$Th e pro of i s  pu blished  in refer enc e  [@B V- LM S], act ually for dat ain a funct io nal  space $ \,D_*({{ \overline{\Omega}}})\,$ contain ing  $\,B _*({ {\overlin e{\ Omega} }}) \ ,$. Se e Theo rem 1 .3 .1i n  [@BV - L MS ].Asimilar ex t e nsi on ho ld s fo r the S tokes problem, ass how n in referenc e [ @BVJ P ] ,The o re m  6. 1, whe r e  we have proved  that if $ \, { \b oldsymbol{ f }}\ in  \,{\bo ldsymbo l{D}} _ *({{\ov erline{\O mega}}})\ ,, $ th e n  th e solution  $\,({\b oldsymbol { u}},\ , p) \,$ o f p roblem  s ati sfies  the e s tim ate $ \, \|\ ,{ \bolds ymbol {u }}\,\|_{ 1,\,1}+\,\|\,p\,\|_{0,\ ,
|\,,$$ we_may write_$$[\,f\,]_* =\,\int_0^R  \,\sup_{_\,x \in\,{{\overline{\Omega}}}}\,_{{\omega}}_f(x;\,r)\,
\,\frac{dr}{r}\,.\label{catriz}$$_So, together_with_$\,C_*({{\overline{\Omega}}})\,,$ we have_considered a functional_space $\,B_*({{\overline{\Omega}}})\,$ obtained by_commuting *integral* and_*sup*_operators in the right hand side of definition : For each $\,f \in\,C({{\overline{\Omega}}})\,,$ we_defined_the semi-norm_$$\langle\,f\,\rangle_*_=_\,\sup_{ \,x \in\,{{\overline{\Omega}}}}\, \int_0^R \,
{{\omega}}_f(x;\,r)\,
\,\frac{dr}{r}\,,\label{seis-bis}$$_and a related functional space$\,_B_*({{\overline{\Omega}}})\,.$ We_have shown that the inclusion $ \,C_*({{\overline{\Omega}}}) \subset\,B_*({{\overline{\Omega}}})\,$_is_proper, by constructing_strongly oscillating functions which belong to $\,B_*({{\overline{\Omega}}})\,$ but not_to $\,C_*({{\overline{\Omega}}})\,.$ This construction was recently_published in reference_[@BV-LMS],_Proposition_1.7.1. Furthermore, in \[BVUN\],_we have shown that Theorem \[laplaces\]_and similar results hold in a_weaker form, for data $\,f
\in\,B_*({{\overline{\Omega}}})\,$, by proving_that the first order derivatives of_the solution $\,u\,$ are Lipschitz_continuous in_$\,{{\overline{\Omega}}}\,.$ The proof is published_in reference [@BV-LMS],_actually for_data in a_functional space $\,D_*({{\overline{\Omega}}})\,$ containing $\,B_*({{\overline{\Omega}}})\,$. See_Theorem 1.3.1 in_[@BV-LMS]. A similar extension holds for_the_Stokes problem, as_shown_in_reference [@BVJP],_Theorem 6.1, where_we_have proved_that_if $\,{\boldsymbol{f}}\in \,{\boldsymbol{D}}_*({{\overline{\Omega}}})\,,$ then the solution_$\,({\boldsymbol{u}},\,p)\,$_of problem satisfies the estimate $\, \|\,{\boldsymbol{u}}\,\|_{1,\,1}+\,\|\,p\,\|_{0,\,