gamma}_{\ell},\hat{\lambda}_{\ell}),\hat{\Delta
}_{2i}=m(z_{i},\beta_{0},\hat{\gamma}_{\ell})-m(z_{i},\beta_{0},\gamma_{0}),\\
\hat{\Delta}_{3i}  &  =\phi(z_{i},\hat{\gamma}_{\ell},\lambda_{0})-\phi
(z_{i},\gamma_{0},\lambda_{0}),\hat{\Delta}_{4i}=\phi(z_{i},\gamma_{0},\hat{\lambda}_{\ell})-\phi(z_{i},\gamma_{0},\lambda_{0}),\\
\hat{\Delta}_{5i}  &  =\phi(z_{i},\hat{\gamma}_{\ell},\hat{\lambda}_{\ell
})-\phi(z_{i},\hat{\gamma}_{\ell},\lambda_{0})-\phi(z_{i},\gamma_{0},\hat{\lambda}_{\ell})+\phi(z_{i},\gamma_{0},\lambda_{0}).\end{aligned}$$ By standard arguments it suffices to show that for each $j$ and $\ell,$ $$\frac{1}{n}\sum_{i\in I_{\ell}}\left\Vert \hat{\Delta}_{ji}\right\Vert
^{2}\overset{p}{\longrightarrow}0. \label{var conv}$$ For $j=1$ it follows by a mean value expansion and Assumption 7 with $E[b(z_{i})^{2}]<\infty$ that$$\frac{1}{n}\sum_{i\in I_{\ell}}\left\Vert \hat{\Delta}_{1i}\right\Vert
^{2}=\frac{1}{n}\sum_{i\in I_{\ell}}\left\Vert \frac{\partial}{\partial\beta
}\psi(z_{i},\bar{\beta},\hat{\gamma}_{\ell},\hat{\lambda}_{\ell})(\hat{\beta
}-\beta)\right\Vert ^{2}\leq\frac{1}{n}\left(  \sum_{i\in I_{\ell}}b(z_{i})^{2}\right)  \left\Vert \hat{\beta}-\beta\right\Vert ^{2}\overset{p}{\longrightarrow}0,$$ where $\bar{\beta}\,$is a mean value that actually differs from row to row of $\partial\psi(z_{i},\bar{\beta},\hat{\gamma}_{\ell},\hat{\lambda}_{\
gamma}_{\ell},\hat{\lambda}_{\ell}),\hat{\Delta 
 } _ { 2i}=m(z_{i},\beta_{0},\hat{\gamma}_{\ell})-m(z_{i},\beta_{0},\gamma_{0}),\\ 
 \hat{\Delta}_{3i }   &   = \phi(z_{i},\hat{\gamma}_{\ell},\lambda_{0})-\phi 
 (z_{i},\gamma_{0},\lambda_{0}),\hat{\Delta}_{4i}=\phi(z_{i},\gamma_{0},\hat{\lambda}_{\ell})-\phi(z_{i},\gamma_{0},\lambda_{0}),\\ 
 \hat{\Delta}_{5i }   &   = \phi(z_{i},\hat{\gamma}_{\ell},\hat{\lambda}_{\ell 
 }) -\phi(z_{i},\hat{\gamma}_{\ell},\lambda_{0})-\phi(z_{i},\gamma_{0},\hat{\lambda}_{\ell})+\phi(z_{i},\gamma_{0},\lambda_{0}).\end{aligned}$$ By standard arguments it suffices to show that for each $ j$ and $ \ell,$ $ $ \frac{1}{n}\sum_{i\in I_{\ell}}\left\Vert \hat{\Delta}_{ji}\right\Vert 
 ^{2}\overset{p}{\longrightarrow}0. \label{var conv}$$ For $ j=1 $ it follows by a base value expansion and premise 7 with $ E[b(z_{i})^{2}]<\infty$ that$$\frac{1}{n}\sum_{i\in I_{\ell}}\left\Vert \hat{\Delta}_{1i}\right\Vert 
 ^{2}=\frac{1}{n}\sum_{i\in I_{\ell}}\left\Vert \frac{\partial}{\partial\beta 
 } \psi(z_{i},\bar{\beta},\hat{\gamma}_{\ell},\hat{\lambda}_{\ell})(\hat{\beta 
 } -\beta)\right\Vert ^{2}\leq\frac{1}{n}\left (  \sum_{i\in I_{\ell}}b(z_{i})^{2}\right)   \left\Vert \hat{\beta}-\beta\right\Vert ^{2}\overset{p}{\longrightarrow}0,$$ where $ \bar{\beta}\,$is a mean value that actually differs from row to course of $ \partial\psi(z_{i},\bar{\beta},\hat{\gamma}_{\ell},\hat{\lambda}_{\
gamla}_{\ell},\hat{\lambda}_{\ell}),\hat{\Deltx
}_{2i}=m(z_{i},\beta_{0},\hat{\gamma}_{\ell})-m(z_{m},\beta_{0},\gajma_{0}),\\
\hat{\Deuta}_{3i}  &  =\phi(z_{i},\hat{\gamma}_{\ell},\lambva_{0})-\phu
(z_{i},\ganma_{0},\lambda_{0}),\hat{\Delta}_{4i}=\phi(z_{k},\gamma_{0},\hat{\pambda}_{\elo})-\phi(e_{i},\gamma_{0},\lambda_{0}),\\
\hat{\Dxmta}_{5i}  &  =\phi(z_{i},\gwt{\gakna}_{\ell},\hat{\lambda}_{\gll
})-\phi(z_{i},\hat{\gdmma}_{\ell},\lambda_{0})-\pvi(x_{i},\yamma_{0},\hat{\lambda}_{\ell})+\phi(z_{i},\gamma_{0},\lambda_{0}).\end{wligned}$$ Bj standard argomentx it alfnices to show that for each $j$ ans $\ell,$ $$\fgac{1}{n}\sum_{i\in I_{\ell}}\legt\Vert \hat{\Delta}_{ji}\right\Vert
^{2}\lverdet{p}{\longrightarrow}0. \label{var cinv}$$ Sir $j=1$ it folluws by a mtau value expznsion and Assumption 7 with $E[b(z_{k})^{2}]<\inftv$ that$$\frac{1}{n}\wun_{i\ij I_{\ell}}\left\Vect \hat{\Qelta}_{1i}\right\Vcgt
^{2}=\frac{1}{n}\vum_{i\in O_{\ell}}\left\Vert \fvac{\pactiao}{\partial\beta
}\psi(z_{i},\bar{\bxta},\hat{\gamma}_{\ell},\hat{\lamfda}_{\ell})(\hat{\teca
}-\beta)\right\Vert ^{2}\leq\frqc{1}{b}\left(  \suk_{i\in U_{\elu}}b(z_{j})^{2}\rmghf)  \lefh\Vect \hat{\beta}-\bsta\right\Verr ^{2}\overset{p}{\longrightsrwiw}0,$$ where $\bar{\bsta}\,$is w iean value that actually differs from rmw fo row of $\partial\psi(z_{i},\bqr{\beta},\hat{\gamma}_{\ell},\hat{\lwmbda}_{\
gamma}_{\ell},\hat{\lambda}_{\ell}),\hat{\Delta }_{2i}=m(z_{i},\beta_{0},\hat{\gamma}_{\ell})-m(z_{i},\beta_{0},\gamma_{0}),\\ \hat{\Delta}_{3i} & =\phi(z_{i},\hat{\gamma}_{\ell},\lambda_{0})-\phi (z_{i},\gamma_{0},\lambda_{0}),\hat{\Delta}_{4i}=\phi(z_{i},\gamma_{0},\hat{\lambda}_{\ell})-\phi(z_{i},\gamma_{0},\lambda_{0}),\\ \hat{\Delta}_{5i} })-\phi(z_{i},\hat{\gamma}_{\ell},\lambda_{0})-\phi(z_{i},\gamma_{0},\hat{\lambda}_{\ell})+\phi(z_{i},\gamma_{0},\lambda_{0}).\end{aligned}$$ standard arguments suffices to show $\ell,$ I_{\ell}}\left\Vert \hat{\Delta}_{ji}\right\Vert ^{2}\overset{p}{\longrightarrow}0. conv}$$ For $j=1$ follows by a mean value expansion Assumption 7 with $E[b(z_{i})^{2}]<\infty$ that$$\frac{1}{n}\sum_{i\in I_{\ell}}\left\Vert \hat{\Delta}_{1i}\right\Vert ^{2}=\frac{1}{n}\sum_{i\in I_{\ell}}\left\Vert \frac{\partial}{\partial\beta }\psi(z_{i},\bar{\beta},\hat{\gamma}_{\ell},\hat{\lambda}_{\ell})(\hat{\beta }-\beta)\right\Vert ^{2}\leq\frac{1}{n}\left( I_{\ell}}b(z_{i})^{2}\right) \left\Vert \hat{\beta}-\beta\right\Vert ^{2}\overset{p}{\longrightarrow}0,$$ where $\bar{\beta}\,$is a mean value that actually differs from to of
gamma}_{\ell},\hat{\lambda}_{\ell}),\hat{\DeLta
}_{2i}=m(z_{i},\betA_{0},\hat{\gAmmA}_{\elL})-m(Z_{i},\beTa_{0},\gaMma_{0}),\\
\hat{\Delta}_{3i}  &  =\phI(Z_{i},\haT{\gamma}_{\ell},\lambda_{0})-\phi
(z_{i},\gaMma_{0},\laMbDA_{0}),\hat{\dElTa}_{4i}=\phI(z_{i},\gammA_{0},\HaT{\LAmbDa}_{\ElL})-\phI(z_{I},\GaMma_{0},\laMbdA_{0}),\\
\hat{\DelTa}_{5i}  &  =\phi(z_{i},\haT{\gaMmA}_{\ell},\hat{\lambdA}_{\ElL
})-\phi(z_{i},\hat{\gAmmA}_{\ell},\lambda_{0})-\phI(z_{i},\Gamma_{0},\hAt{\LamBDa}_{\ell})+\Phi(Z_{i},\gamMa_{0},\lambDA_{0}).\end{alIgned}$$ By stAnDArd argUMents it SUFfIces To show that for each $J$ AnD $\Ell,$ $$\frac{1}{n}\sum_{i\in i_{\ell}}\leFt\vErT \HAt{\DEltA}_{ji}\right\VeRt
^{2}\OversET{p}{\longrIGhTARRow}0. \LAbel{var conv}$$ FoR $j=1$ it follows BY a mEan valUe ExpANsion aNd AssUmPTioN 7 with $E[b(z_{i})^{2}]<\inFty$ tHat$$\frac{1}{n}\sUm_{i\in I_{\ELl}}\left\VERt \hat{\DeLta}_{1i}\riGht\verT
^{2}=\fraC{1}{N}\sUm_{I\in i_{\eLL}}\leFT\VErt \FRac{\Partial}{\pArTiAl\betA
}\psi(Z_{I},\BAR{\betA},\haT{\gamMa}_{\ell},\Hat{\lambda}_{\ell})(\hAt{\bEta
}-\bETa)\rIght\VErt ^{2}\leQ\fraC{1}{n}\Left(  \sUm_{i\in I_{\Ell}}b(z_{I})^{2}\rIght)  \left\Vert \hat{\Beta}-\Beta\right\verT ^{2}\oVerSeT{p}{\lonGRightaRroW}0,$$ whEre $\bar{\bEta}\,$is a mEAn vAlUE THaT actually differs frOm ROW tO row of $\paRtial\pSI(z_{I},\bAR{\beta},\hat{\GaMma}_{\Ell},\hAT{\LambdA}_{\
gamma}_{\ell},\hat{\lambda }_{\ell}), \hat{ \De lta 
} _{2i }=m( z_{i},\beta_{0 } ,\ha t{\gamma}_{\ell})-m(z_ {i},\ be t a_{0 } ,\ gamma _{0}),\ \ 
\ h a t{\ De lt a}_ {3 i } &  = \ph i(z_{i} ,\hat{\gam ma} _{ \ell},\lambd a _{ 0})-\phi
( z_{ i},\gamma_{0 },\ lambda _{ 0}) , \hat{ \De lta}_ {4i}=\ p hi(z_{ i},\gamma _{ 0 },\hat { \lambda } _ {\ ell} )-\phi(z_{i},\gam m a_ { 0},\lambda_{0} ),\\
\ ha t {\ D e lta }_{ 5i}  &  =\ ph i(z_{ i },\hat{ \ ga m m a }_{ \ ell},\hat{\la mbda}_{\ell })- \phi(z _{ i}, \ hat{\g amma} _{ \ ell },\lambda_{ 0})- \phi(z_{i },\gam m a_{0},\ h at{\lam bda}_{ \el l}) +\ph i (z _{ i}, \g a mma _ {0 },\ l amb da_{0}). \e nd {alig ned} $ $ B y st and ardargum ents it suffi ces  tos how  that  foreach  $ j$ an d $\el l,$ $ $\ frac{1}{n}\sum_ {i\i n I_{\ell }}\ le ft\ Ve rt \h a t{\Del ta} _{j i}\righ t\Vert^ {2} \o v e r se t{p}{\longrightarr ow } 0 .\label{v ar con v }$ $F or $j=1$  i t f ollo w s  by a  mea n  v alue exp ansion an dAssumpt io n 7 wi th  $E [b( z_{i} ) ^{2} ]<\inf ty$ that $$\fr a c{1}{n}\sum_{i \ in I_{\ell}}\ l ef t \ Ve r t \h at{ \Delta}_{1i }\ri g ht\V ert^ {2 }=\ f rac{1 }{n}\ su m _{ i \in I_{\ell}}\left\ Ve rt \fr ac{\p artial}{\part ial\beta
} \ p s i(z_{i}, \bar { \b e ta},\hat{\gamm a}_{\ ell},\hat{ \ lambda}_ {\ell })(\hat{ \beta
}-\ b e ta)\righ t\V ert  ^{ 2}\ l e q\ frac{1}{n}\le f t (  \ su m_{i\in  I_ {\ell}} b(z _{i })^ {2} \r ight)  \l eft\Vert  \ ha t{ \b eta }-\be t a\right\ Ve rt^{ 2}\ overs e t{p}{\ longr ight ar ro w }0, $$ wher e  $ \ b ar{\ be ta }\,$ isameanvalu e  th at actu ally diff ers from  r ow  to row  of $\partial \p si(z_{i},\ ba r{\ beta}, \ h at{\gamm a}_{\ell},\hat{\lambda} _ {\
gamma}_{\ell},\hat{\lambda}_{\ell}),\hat{\Delta
}_{2i}=m(z_{i},\beta_{0},\hat{\gamma}_{\ell})-m(z_{i},\beta_{0},\gamma_{0}),\\
\hat{\Delta}_{3i} _& _=\phi(z_{i},\hat{\gamma}_{\ell},\lambda_{0})-\phi
(z_{i},\gamma_{0},\lambda_{0}),\hat{\Delta}_{4i}=\phi(z_{i},\gamma_{0},\hat{\lambda}_{\ell})-\phi(z_{i},\gamma_{0},\lambda_{0}),\\
\hat{\Delta}_{5i}  & _=\phi(z_{i},\hat{\gamma}_{\ell},\hat{\lambda}_{\ell
})-\phi(z_{i},\hat{\gamma}_{\ell},\lambda_{0})-\phi(z_{i},\gamma_{0},\hat{\lambda}_{\ell})+\phi(z_{i},\gamma_{0},\lambda_{0}).\end{aligned}$$ By_standard_arguments it_suffices_to show that_for each $j$_and $\ell,$ $$\frac{1}{n}\sum_{i\in I_{\ell}}\left\Vert_\hat{\Delta}_{ji}\right\Vert
^{2}\overset{p}{\longrightarrow}0. \label{var conv}$$_For_$j=1$ it follows by a mean value expansion and Assumption 7 with $E[b(z_{i})^{2}]<\infty$ that$$\frac{1}{n}\sum_{i\in_I_{\ell}}\left\Vert_\hat{\Delta}_{1i}\right\Vert
^{2}=\frac{1}{n}\sum_{i\in I_{\ell}}\left\Vert_\frac{\partial}{\partial\beta
}\psi(z_{i},\bar{\beta},\hat{\gamma}_{\ell},\hat{\lambda}_{\ell})(\hat{\beta
}-\beta)\right\Vert_^{2}\leq\frac{1}{n}\left(_ \sum_{i\in I_{\ell}}b(z_{i})^{2}\right)  \left\Vert_\hat{\beta}-\beta\right\Vert ^{2}\overset{p}{\longrightarrow}0,$$ where $\bar{\beta}\,$is a_mean value_that actually differs from row to row of_$\partial\psi(z_{i},\bar{\beta},\hat{\gamma}_{\ell},\hat{\lambda}_{\