   \max\left\{ R, (1-R) \right\}^{\gamma/2}, \quad
 {e_{\gamma}^{{lb}}(R)}= \min\{ R, (1-R) \}^{\gamma/2}, \end{gathered}$$ or with $${d_{\gamma}^{{lb}}(r)}= r^{\gamma/2} (1-r)^{\gamma/2}, \quad {d_{\gamma}^{{ub}}(r)}=1,\quad
 {e_{\gamma}^{{ub}}(R)}=  2^{1-\gamma/2}, \quad
   {e_{\gamma}^{{lb}}(R)}= R^{\gamma/2} (1-R)^{\gamma},$$ as shown in \[Sec Model 3 upper\] and \[Sec Model 3 lower\].

This Model 3 for the transition function $\mathcal{B}$ is of particular importance for establishing macroscopic moments models starting from the Boltzmann equation. Namely, in [@MPC-Dj-S] it is shown that the six moments model with this transition function provides a source term which satisfies the macroscopic residual inequality on the whole range of six moments model validity, that provides the total agreement with the extended thermodynamics theory of six moments, as one of the rare systems admitting a non-linear or *far from equilibrium* closure of the governing equations using the entropy principle. Moreover, for this model 3 of the transition function $\mathcal{B}$, the macroscopic fourteen moments model achieves the matching with experimental data as well. More precisely, [@MPC-Dj-S] shows that the model 3 yields transport coefficients (shear and bulk viscosities and heat conductivity) that provide both experimentally measured dependence of the shear viscosity upon temperature and the Prantdtl number which coincides with its theoretical value at a satisfactory level. This remarkable success lies in the new *additive* form of the transition function that we propose in, instead of the multiplicative one used so far in the literature.

Fundamental lemmas {#Sec: fund lemmas}
==================

In this Section we prove two fundamental lemmas, that should be used sequentially, as they are presented.\
All of them are motivated by the search of a proof showing that $k$-th polynomial moment of the solution will satisfy an ODI with a negative superlinear term, that is $$\frac{\mathrm{d} }{\mathrm{d}t} \mathfrak{m}_k[f](t)=   \int_{ \Delta} Q(f,f)(
\max\left\ { R, (1 - R) \right\}^{\gamma/2 }, \quad 
  { e_{\gamma}^{{lb}}(R)}= \min\ { R, (1 - R) \}^{\gamma/2 }, \end{gathered}$$ or with $ $ { d_{\gamma}^{{lb}}(r)}= r^{\gamma/2 } (1 - r)^{\gamma/2 }, \quad { d_{\gamma}^{{ub}}(r)}=1,\quad 
  { e_{\gamma}^{{ub}}(R)}=   2^{1-\gamma/2 }, \quad 
    { e_{\gamma}^{{lb}}(R)}= R^{\gamma/2 } (1 - R)^{\gamma},$$ as testify in \[Sec Model 3 upper\ ] and \[Sec Model 3 lower\ ]. 

 This Model 3 for the passage function $ \mathcal{B}$ is of particular importance for establishing macroscopic moment models starting from the Boltzmann equality. Namely, in [ @MPC - Dj - S ] it is shown that the six moments model with this passage function provides a reservoir term which satisfies the macroscopic residual inequality on the hale compass of six moments model validity, that provides the total agreement with the strain thermodynamics theory of six moments, as one of the rare system admitting a non - linear or * far from equilibrium * closure of the government equations use the entropy principle. Moreover, for this model 3 of the passage function $ \mathcal{B}$, the macroscopic fourteen moments model achieves the matching with experimental data as well. More precisely, [ @MPC - Dj - S ] shows that the model 3 yields transport coefficients (shear and bulk viscosities and heat conductivity) that provide both experimentally measured dependence of the shear viscosity upon temperature and the Prantdtl act which coincides with its theoretical value at a satisfactory level. This noteworthy achiever lies in the new * additive * form of the passage function that we propose in, instead of the multiplicative one used therefore far in the literature. 

 Fundamental lemmas { # Sec: fund lemmas } 
 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 

 In this Section we prove two cardinal lemmas, that should be used sequentially, as they are presented.\ 
 All of them are motivated by the search of a proof showing that $ k$-th polynomial moment of the solution will meet an ODI with a damaging superlinear term, that is $ $ \frac{\mathrm{d } } { \mathrm{d}t } \mathfrak{m}_k[f](t)=    \int _ { \Delta } Q(f, f) (
   \lax\left\{ R, (1-R) \right\}^{\gamma/2}, \qmad
 {e_{\gamma}^{{lb}}(R)}= \miu\{ R, (1-R) \}^{\gemma/2}, \ens{gatherea}$$ or with $${d_{\gamma}^{{lb}}(r)}= r^{\gamma/2} (1-r)^{\jammq/2}, \quae {d_{\gamma}^{{ub}}(r)}=1,\quad
 {e_{\gamma}^{{jb}}(R)}=  2^{1-\gammw/2}, \quad
   {e_{\ganna}^{{lb}}(R)}= R^{\gamma/2} (1-R)^{\gamma},$$ as sglwn nn \[Sec Model 3 upker\] and \[Sec Kodel 3 lower\].

Thhs Mldel 3 for the transition function $\mwthcal{B}$ id of particulat imppwtandv nor establishing macroscopic momsnts movels starting ftom the Boltzmann equation. Namfly, in [@MPC-Dj-S] it id shown thaj thq six moments model with this transjtion function provides a sourcd terk which sajnwfifv the macrowcopib residual incaualitf on thr whole range pf vix moments model validivy, that provides the total agsezment with the extendwd therkodytamizw tfeody or six lomxnts, as one of the rarw systems admitting a bon-linear or *rar frjm equilibrium* closure of the governing exuafions using the entropy principle. Moreover, flr this mjdel 3 of the transition function $\mathcal{B}$, the macsosco'iz fiuvteev mlments model achieves the matching with experyjemtsl data as welj. More precosflu, [@MPC-Dj-S] shows that cge model 3 yields trajsport soeffucients (srear and bulk viscosities and hwat conductinity) that provide both experimentclly mgasurec dependence of the shecr visdosity upon temperathfe and the Prantatl ngmber which coincides with its theoceticcl value at s satiffactory lfvel. Bvis remarkable sucfess pias in the jew *additive* form of the transivmon function jhad wv propose in, ikstead of the mtltiplicative pne useb so fxr in the miteratnre.

Fundamentwl lemmas {#Sec: vund lemmas}
==================

Ii this Sestiob we prove gdo fundamental lemmas, tkct should be used sequentiakly, zs they are prewenuee.\
All of them ate ootyvwtxd by dhe search ox a oroug shoding that $k$-bh oolymomial moment of the solhtion will satisfy ak ODI wity a negaeive superlinrar term, that is $$\fgac{\mavhrm{d} }{\oathrk{d}t} \mathfrak{m}_k[f](t)=   \int_{ \Delta} Q(f,f)(
\max\left\{ R, (1-R) \right\}^{\gamma/2}, \quad {e_{\gamma}^{{lb}}(R)}= \min\{ \}^{\gamma/2}, or with r^{\gamma/2} (1-r)^{\gamma/2}, \quad R^{\gamma/2} as shown in Model 3 upper\] \[Sec Model 3 lower\]. This Model for the transition function $\mathcal{B}$ is of particular importance for establishing macroscopic moments starting from the Boltzmann equation. Namely, in [@MPC-Dj-S] it is shown that the moments with transition provides a source term which satisfies the macroscopic residual inequality on the whole range of six model validity, that provides the total agreement with extended thermodynamics theory of moments, as one of the systems a non-linear *far equilibrium* of the governing using the entropy principle. Moreover, for this model 3 of the transition function $\mathcal{B}$, the macroscopic fourteen model achieves with experimental as More [@MPC-Dj-S] shows that 3 yields transport coefficients (shear and heat conductivity) that provide both experimentally measured dependence the shear upon temperature and the Prantdtl number coincides with its theoretical value at a satisfactory This remarkable success lies in the new *additive* form of the transition function that we instead of the multiplicative used so far the Fundamental {#Sec: lemmas} ================== this Section we prove two fundamental lemmas, that should be used as they are presented.\ All of them are motivated by of proof showing that polynomial moment of the will an ODI with a term, is \int_{ Q(f,f)(
   \max\left\{ R, (1-R) \right\}^{\gamma/2}, \quad
 {e_{\gAmma}^{{lb}}(R)}= \min\{ r, (1-R) \}^{\gamMa/2}, \eNd{gAtHereD}$$ or wIth $${d_{\gamma}^{{lb}}(r)}= r^{\gAMma/2} (1-r)^{\Gamma/2}, \quad {d_{\gamma}^{{ub}}(r)}=1,\quad
 {E_{\gammA}^{{uB}}(r)}=  2^{1-\gamMA/2}, \qUad
   {e_{\gAmma}^{{lb}}(R)}= r^{\GaMMA/2} (1-R)^{\gAmMa},$$ As sHoWN iN \[Sec MOdeL 3 upper\] aNd \[Sec Model 3 LowEr\].

this Model 3 for THe Transition FunCtion $\mathcal{b}$ is Of partIcUlaR ImporTanCe for EstablIShing mAcroscopiC mOMents mODels staRTInG froM the Boltzmann equaTIoN. namely, in [@MPC-Dj-S] It is shOwN ThAT The Six Moments modEl With tHIs transITiON FUncTIon provides a sOurce term whICh sAtisfiEs The MAcroscOpic rEsIDuaL inequality On thE whole ranGe of siX Moments MOdel valIdity, tHat ProVideS ThE tOtaL aGReeMEnT wiTH thE extendeD tHeRmodyNamiCS THEory Of sIx moMents, As one of the rarE syStemS AdmIttinG a non-LineAr Or *far From eqUilibRiUm* closure of the gOverNing equatIonS uSinG tHe entROpy priNciPle. moreoveR, for thiS ModEl 3 OF THe Transition function $\MaTHCaL{B}$, the macRoscopIC fOuRTeen momeNtS moDel aCHIeves The mATcHing with ExperiMEnTaL data as WeLl. More PrEciSelY, [@MPC-DJ-s] shoWs that The model 3 YieldS Transport coeffICients (shear anD BuLK ViSCosiTieS and heat conDuctIVity) That PRoVidE Both eXperiMeNTaLLy measured dependencE oF the shEar viScosity upon teMperature aND THe PrantdTl nuMBeR Which coincides With iTs theoretiCAl value aT a satIsfactorY level. ThiS REmarkablE suCceSs lIes IN ThE new *additive* fORM of tHe TransitIon FunctioN thAt wE prOpoSe In, instead Of the mulTiPlIcAtIve One usED so far in ThE liTeRatUre.

FuNDamentAl lemMas {#SEc: FuND leMmas}
==================

In tHIs sECtioN wE pRove Two FuNdameNtal LEmmAs, that sHould be usEd sEQuenTiAlLy, as theY are presented.\
alL of them are MoTivAted by THE search oF a proof showing that $k$-th poLYnomial MomEnt of The sOlution wiLl sAtisfy An Odi with a NegatiVe supErLinEAR term, THAt Is $$\fRaC{\mathrm{d} }{\maTHRm{d}T} \mathFrAk{m}_k[F](t)=   \int_{ \DeLta} Q(f,f)(
   \max\left\{ R, (1-R) \r ight\}^{\g amma/ 2},  \q ua d
 { e_{\ gamma}^{{lb}}( R )}=\min\{ R, (1-R) \}^{\g amma/ 2} ,  \en d {g ather ed}$$ o r  w i t h $ ${ d_ {\g am m a} ^{{lb }}( r)}= r^ {\gamma/2}  (1 -r )^{\gamma/2} ,  \ quad {d_{\ gam ma}^{{ub}}(r )}= 1,\qua d {e _ {\gam ma} ^{{ub }}(R)} =   2^{1 -\gamma/2 }, \quad  {e_{\ g a mm a}^{ {lb}}(R)}= R^{\ga m ma / 2} (1-R)^{\gam ma},$$  a s  s h o wnin\[Sec Mode l3 upp e r\] and \[ S e c  Mo d el 3 lower\]. 

This Mode l  3for th etra n sition  func ti o n $ \mathcal{B} $ is  of parti culari mportan c e for e stabli shi ngmacr o sc op icmo m ent s  m ode l s s tartingfr om  theBolt z m a n n eq uat ion.  Name ly, in [@MPC- Dj- S] i t  is  show n tha t th esix m oments  mode lwith this trans itio n functio n p ro vid es  a so u rce te rmwhi ch sati sfies t h e m ac r o s co pic residual inequ al i t yon the w hole r a ng eo f six mo me nts  mod e l  vali dity ,  t hat prov ides t h eto tal agr ee ment w it h t heexten d ed t hermod ynamicstheor y  of six moment s , as one of t h er a re syst ems  admittinga no n -lin earo r*fa r  from  equi li b ri u m* closure of the g ov erning  equa tions using t he entropy p r inciple.  Mor e ov e r, for this mo del 3  of the tr a nsitionfunct ion $\ma thcal{B}$ , the macr osc opi c f our t e en  moments mode l achi ev es themat ching w ith  ex per ime nt al data a s well.Mo re  p re cis ely,[ @MPC-Dj- S]  sh ow s t hat t h e mode l 3 y ield str a nsp ort coe f fi c i ents  ( sh earand  b ulk v isco s iti es andheat cond uct i vity )th at prov ide both expe ri mentally m ea sur ed dep e n dence of  the shear viscosity up o n tempe rat ure a nd t he Prantd tlnumber  wh i ch coi ncides  with  i tst h eoret i c al  va lu e at a sat i s fac toryle vel.  This r emarkable successl ies  in the new * add itiv e *  f orm of the  t r ans i t ion function th at we prop os e  i n, instead ofth e multi plicati ve on e  used s o far inthe liter at ure. Fun damental l emmas {# Sec: fund lemma s }===== === ====== == ==
In t his Se c tio n weprovetw o fund ament al  lemmas,  that should be used se quenti ally,  as  they are  pr e sen ted.\
All  ofthem are m oti vat ed by  th e  sear ch o f  a  pr o of sh owin g  that $k$ - th  po l y no mial moment o f  th e sol uti o n will  sat isfy an ODI witha  negative supe rlin e a r t erm ,  tha tis $$\frac{\ma thr m{ d }  }{\math rm {d}t} \math frak{m}_ k[ f ](t)=    \in t_{ \D elta} Q ( f ,f ) (
 _ \max\left\{_R, (1-R) \right\}^{\gamma/2}, \quad
_{e_{\gamma}^{{lb}}(R)}= \min\{_R,_(1-R) \}^{\gamma/2},_\end{gathered}$$_or with $${d_{\gamma}^{{lb}}(r)}=_r^{\gamma/2} (1-r)^{\gamma/2}, \quad_{d_{\gamma}^{{ub}}(r)}=1,\quad
 {e_{\gamma}^{{ub}}(R)}=  2^{1-\gamma/2},_\quad
  _{e_{\gamma}^{{lb}}(R)}=_R^{\gamma/2} (1-R)^{\gamma},$$ as shown in \[Sec Model 3 upper\] and \[Sec Model 3 lower\].

This_Model_3 for_the_transition_function $\mathcal{B}$ is of particular_importance for establishing macroscopic moments_models starting_from the Boltzmann equation. Namely, in [@MPC-Dj-S] it_is_shown that the_six moments model with this transition function provides a_source term which satisfies the macroscopic_residual inequality on_the_whole_range of six moments_model validity, that provides the total_agreement with the extended thermodynamics theory_of six moments, as one of the_rare systems admitting a non-linear or_*far from equilibrium* closure of_the governing_equations using the entropy principle._Moreover, for this_model 3_of the transition_function $\mathcal{B}$, the macroscopic fourteen moments_model achieves the_matching with experimental data as well._More_precisely, [@MPC-Dj-S] shows_that_the_model 3_yields transport coefficients_(shear_and bulk_viscosities_and heat conductivity) that provide both_experimentally_measured dependence of the shear viscosity upon_temperature and the Prantdtl_number_which coincides with its_theoretical value at a satisfactory_level. This remarkable success lies in_the new_*additive* form_of the transition function that we propose in, instead of the_multiplicative one used so far in_the literature.

Fundamental lemmas {#Sec:_fund lemmas}
==================

In_this_Section we prove_two_fundamental lemmas,_that should be used sequentially, as they_are presented.\
All_of them are motivated by the_search of a proof_showing_that $k$-th polynomial moment of the_solution will satisfy an ODI with_a negative superlinear term, that_is_$$\frac{\mathrm{d}_}{\mathrm{d}t} \mathfrak{m}_k[f](t)=   \int_{_\Delta} Q(f,f)(