$. While it is clear that the sequence $\{p_n\}\/$ cannot possibly capture all the information contained in $\phi(z)\/$ as all the off-diagonal matrix elements $\langle m|\hat{\rho}|n\rangle \;,\;m\neq n\/$, are ignored, we can easily show that the PND $\{p_n\}\/$ and the distribution ${\cal P}(I)\/$ determine each other uniquely. To recover ${\cal P}(I)\/$ from $\{p_n\}\/$ we define a generating function $\Lambda(K),\;0\leq K<\infty\/$, to represent the latter: $$\begin{aligned}
\Lambda(K) &=&
\sum\limits^{\infty}_{n=0} (-K)^n p_n /n!\nonumber\\
&=& \int\limits^{\infty}_{0} dI {\cal P}(I)\; e^{-I}
J_0(2\sqrt{IK})\;.\end{aligned}$$ There is a great deal of freedom in the way we set up $\Lambda(K)\/$; we have chosen it so that, among other things, on the basis of eqn.(2.8) it is entire analytic in $K\/$. One can then invert eqn.(2.14) by using the Fourier - Bessel integral theorem to get $$\begin{aligned}
 {\cal P}(I)
= e^{I}\int\limits^{\infty}_{0} dK\;\Lambda(K)
J_0(2\sqrt{KI})\;.\end{aligned}$$

Several signatures of nonclassicality of the PND are well known. The most familiar is the Mandel Q-parameter criterion which distinguishes (in a global sense) between super and subpoissonian PND’s: $$\begin{aligned}
 Q &=&
((\Delta n)^2 -\langle n\rangle )/\langle n\rangle \\ &=& (\langle n^2\rangle  - \langle n\rangle ^2 -
\langle n\rangle )/\langle n\rangle \;,\\ \langle n\rangle  &=&\sum\limits^{\infty}_{n=0} n\;p_n =
\int\limits^{\infty}_{0} 
dI{\cal P}(I) I\;,\\ \langle n^2\rangle  &=& \sum\limits^{\infty}_{n=0}
n^2 p_n = \int\limits
$. While it is clear that the sequence $ \{p_n\}\/$ cannot possibly capture all the information control in $ \phi(z)\/$ as all the away - diagonal matrix elements $ \langle m|\hat{\rho}|n\rangle \;,\;m\neq n\/$, are ignore, we can well show that the PND $ \{p_n\}\/$ and the distribution $ { \cal P}(I)\/$ determine each other uniquely. To recuperate $ { \cal P}(I)\/$ from $ \{p_n\}\/$ we define a generating function $ \Lambda(K),\;0\leq K<\infty\/$, to typify the latter: $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 \Lambda(K) & = & 
 \sum\limits^{\infty}_{n=0 } (-K)^n p_n /n!\nonumber\\ 
 & = & \int\limits^{\infty}_{0 } dI { \cal P}(I)\; e^{-I } 
 J_0(2\sqrt{IK})\;.\end{aligned}$$ There is a great hand of freedom in the way we fructify up $ \Lambda(K)\/$; we have choose it so that, among other things, on the basis of eqn.(2.8) it is entire analytic in $ K\/$. One can then invert eqn.(2.14) by use the Fourier - Bessel integral theorem to get $ $ \begin{aligned } 
  { \cal P}(I) 
 = e^{I}\int\limits^{\infty}_{0 } dK\;\Lambda(K) 
 J_0(2\sqrt{KI})\;.\end{aligned}$$ 

 Several key signature of nonclassicality of the PND are well known. The most familiar is the Mandel Q - parameter criterion which distinguish (in a global sense) between super and subpoissonian PND ’s: $ $ \begin{aligned } 
  Q & = & 
 (( \Delta n)^2 -\langle n\rangle) /\langle n\rangle \\ & = & (\langle n^2\rangle   - \langle n\rangle ^2 - 
 \langle n\rangle) /\langle n\rangle \;,\\ \langle n\rangle   & = & \sum\limits^{\infty}_{n=0 } n\;p_n = 
 \int\limits^{\infty}_{0 } 
 dI{\cal P}(I) I\;,\\ \langle n^2\rangle   & = & \sum\limits^{\infty}_{n=0 } 
 n^2 p_n = \int\limits
$. Whlle it is clear that the sequence $\{p_n\}\/$ caubot povsibly capture all the information containxd ib $\phi(e)\/$ as all the off-diaeonal matgix elemebts $\oqngle m|\hat{\cgo}|n\rangle \;,\;m\nes n\/$, axe ignored, we cak easily shmw that the PNG $\{o_n\}\/$ and the distribution ${\cal P}(I)\/$ determyne eacn lther uniquely. To gesoved ${\cal P}(I)\/$ from $\{p_n\}\/$ we define a generzting flnction $\Lambda(K),\;0\lea K<\infty\/$, to represent the pattfr: $$\begin{aligned}
\Lamhda(K) &=&
\sum\limuts^{\igdty}_{n=0} (-K)^n p_n /n!\vonumber\\
&=& \int\limits^{\infti}_{0} dI {\cal P}(I)\; e^{-I}
J_0(2\sqrt{IK})\;.\end{aligned}$$ Ghere is a greaj sewn of freedon in nhe way we seb up $\Lakbda(K)\/$; wr have chosen lt so thqt, among other things, on the basis of ezn.(2.8) it is ancire analytic in $K\/$. Onw xan tven hnvefr edn.(2.14) gy uaing tje Hourier - Beasel integrql theorem to get $$\btgig{qligned}
 {\cal P}(J)
= e^{I}\ine\lymits^{\infty}_{0} dK\;\Lambda(K)
J_0(2\sqrt{KI})\;.\end{aligned}$$

Seneram signatures of nonclaswicality of the PND ate well knjwn. The most familiar is the Mandel Q-parameter crhterikv wklgh dkwtlnguishes (in a global sense) between super and aunppissonian PND’s: $$\begin{alignrd}
 Q &=&
((\Qelta n)^2 -\langlg n\rangle )/\mangle n\rangle \\ &=& (\lwngle n^2\tangle  - \langle n\ramgle ^2 -
\langle n\rangle )/\langle n\rangle \;,\\ \lauglw n\rangle  &=&\sum\limics^{\infty}_{n=0} n\;p_n =
\int\kimitx^{\infty}_{0} 
dI{\cal P}(I) I\;,\\ \langlz n^2\ranfle  &=& \sum\lilits^{\infty}_{h=0}
v^2 p_n = \int\limits
$. While it is clear that the cannot capture all information contained in matrix $\langle m|\hat{\rho}|n\rangle \;,\;m\neq are ignored, we easily show that the PND $\{p_n\}\/$ the distribution ${\cal P}(I)\/$ determine each other uniquely. To recover ${\cal P}(I)\/$ from we define a generating function $\Lambda(K),\;0\leq K<\infty\/$, to represent the latter: $$\begin{aligned} \Lambda(K) \sum\limits^{\infty}_{n=0} p_n &=& dI {\cal P}(I)\; e^{-I} J_0(2\sqrt{IK})\;.\end{aligned}$$ There is a great deal of freedom in the way we up $\Lambda(K)\/$; we have chosen it so that, other things, on the of eqn.(2.8) it is entire in One can invert by the Fourier - integral theorem to get $$\begin{aligned} {\cal P}(I) = e^{I}\int\limits^{\infty}_{0} dK\;\Lambda(K) J_0(2\sqrt{KI})\;.\end{aligned}$$ Several signatures of nonclassicality of the are well most familiar the Q-parameter which distinguishes (in sense) between super and subpoissonian PND’s: ((\Delta n)^2 -\langle n\rangle )/\langle n\rangle \\ &=& n^2\rangle - n\rangle ^2 - \langle n\rangle )/\langle \;,\\ \langle n\rangle &=&\sum\limits^{\infty}_{n=0} n\;p_n = \int\limits^{\infty}_{0} dI{\cal I\;,\\ \langle n^2\rangle &=& \sum\limits^{\infty}_{n=0} n^2 p_n = \int\limits
$. While it is clear that the sequEnce $\{p_n\}\/$ cannOt posSibLy cApTure All tHe information cONtaiNed in $\phi(z)\/$ as all the off-diAgonaL mATrix ELeMents $\Langle m|\HAt{\RHO}|n\rAnGlE \;,\;m\nEq N\/$, ArE ignoRed, We can eaSily show thAt tHe pND $\{p_n\}\/$ and the dIStRibution ${\caL P}(I)\/$ Determine eacH otHer uniQuEly. tO recoVer ${\Cal P}(I)\/$ From $\{p_n\}\/$ WE definE a generatInG FunctiON $\Lambda(k),\;0\LEq k<\infTy\/$, to represent the lATtER: $$\begin{aligned}
\LAmbda(K) &=&
\SuM\LiMITs^{\iNftY}_{n=0} (-K)^n p_n /n!\nonUmBer\\
&=& \inT\Limits^{\iNFtY}_{0} Di {\Cal p}(i)\; e^{-I}
J_0(2\sqrt{IK})\;.\end{Aligned}$$ TherE Is a Great dEaL of FReedom In the WaY We sEt up $\Lambda(K)\/$; We haVe chosen iT so thaT, Among otHEr thingS, on the BasIs oF eqn.(2.8) IT iS eNtiRe ANalYTiC in $k\/$. one Can then iNvErT eqn.(2.14) bY usiNG THE FouRieR - BesSel inTegral theorem To gEt $$\beGIn{aLigneD}
 {\cal P}(i)
= e^{I}\iNt\LimitS^{\infty}_{0} DK\;\LamBdA(K)
J_0(2\sqrt{KI})\;.\end{aliGned}$$

several siGnaTuRes Of NonclASsicalIty Of tHe PND arE well knOWn. THe MOST fAmiliar is the Mandel q-pARAmEter critErion wHIcH dIStinguisHeS (in A gloBAL sensE) betWEeN super anD subpoISsOnIan PND’s: $$\BeGin{aliGnEd}
 Q &=&
((\delTa n)^2 -\laNGle n\Rangle )/\Langle n\rAngle \\ &=& (\LAngle n^2\rangle  - \laNGle n\rangle ^2 -
\lanGLe N\RAnGLe )/\laNglE n\rangle \;,\\ \lanGle n\RAnglE  &=&\sum\LImIts^{\INfty}_{n=0} N\;p_n =
\inT\lIMiTS^{\infty}_{0} 
dI{\cal P}(I) I\;,\\ \langlE n^2\Rangle  &=& \Sum\liMits^{\infty}_{n=0}
n^2 p_n = \Int\limits
$. While it is clear thatthe sequen ce $\ {p_ n\} \/ $ ca nnot  possibly capt u re a ll the information con taine di n $\ p hi (z)\/ $ as al l  t h e  of f- di ago na l  m atrix  el ements$\langle m |\h at {\rho}|n\ran g le  \;,\;m\ne q n \/$, are ign ore d, weca n e a silysho w tha t theP ND $\{ p_n\}\/$an d  the d i stribut i o n${\c al P}(I)\/$ deter m in e  each other un iquely .T or e cov er${\cal P}( I) \/$ f r om $\{p _ n\ } \ / $ w e  define a gen erating fun c tio n $\La mb da( K ),\;0\ leq K <\ i nft y\/$, to re pres ent the l atter: $$\begi n {aligne d}
\La mbd a(K ) &= & 
\ su m\l im i ts^ { \i nft y }_{ n=0} (-K )^ np_n / n!\n o n u m ber\ \
& =& \ int\l imits^{\infty }_{ 0} d I  {\ cal P }(I)\ ; e^ {- I}
J_ 0(2\sq rt{IK }) \;.\end{aligned }$$There isa g re atde al of freedo m i n t he waywe setu p $ \L a m b da (K)\/$; we have ch os e n  i t so tha t, amo n got h er thing s,  on  the b asisof e q n. (2.8) it  is en t ir eanalyti cin $K\ /$ . O necan t h en i nverteqn.(2.1 4) by using the Four i er - Bessel i n te g r al theo rem  to get $$\ begi n {ali gned } 
{\c a l P}( I)
=e^ { I} \ int\limits^{\infty} _{ 0} dK\ ;\Lam bda(K)
J_0(2\ sqrt{KI})\ ; . \ end{alig ned} $ $Several signat uresof nonclas s icalityof th e PND ar e well kn o w n. The m ost  fa mil iar i sthe Mandel Q- p a rame te r crite rio n which  di sti ngu ish es  (in a gl obal sen se )be tw een  supe r  and sub po iss on ian  PND’ s : $$\b egin{ alig ne d}  Q&=&
((\ D el t a  n)^ 2-\ lang len\ rangl e )/ \ lan gle n\r angle \\&=& (\la ng le  n^2\ra ngle  - \lang le  n\rangle^2  -\langl e n\rangle  )/\langle n\rangle \;, \ \ \lang len\ran gle &=&\sum\ lim its^{\ inf t y}_{n= 0} n\; p_n = 
\ int \ l imits ^ { \i nft y} _{0} 
dI{\ c a l P }(I)I\ ;,\\  \langl e n^2\rangle  &=&\ sum \limits^{\inf ty} _{n= 0 } 
n ^2p _n = \ in t \li m i ts
$. While_it is_clear that the sequence_$\{p_n\}\/$ cannot_possibly_capture all_the_information contained in_$\phi(z)\/$ as all_the off-diagonal matrix elements_$\langle m|\hat{\rho}|n\rangle \;,\;m\neq_n\/$,_are ignored, we can easily show that the PND $\{p_n\}\/$ and the distribution ${\cal_P}(I)\/$_determine each_other_uniquely._To recover ${\cal P}(I)\/$ from_$\{p_n\}\/$ we define a generating_function $\Lambda(K),\;0\leq_K<\infty\/$, to represent the latter: $$\begin{aligned}
\Lambda(K) &=&
\sum\limits^{\infty}_{n=0} (-K)^n_p_n_/n!\nonumber\\
&=& \int\limits^{\infty}_{0} dI_{\cal P}(I)\; e^{-I}
J_0(2\sqrt{IK})\;.\end{aligned}$$ There is a great deal of_freedom in the way we set_up $\Lambda(K)\/$; we_have_chosen_it so that, among_other things, on the basis of_eqn.(2.8) it is entire analytic in_$K\/$. One can then invert eqn.(2.14) by_using the Fourier - Bessel integral_theorem to get $$\begin{aligned}
 {\cal_P}(I)
= e^{I}\int\limits^{\infty}_{0}_dK\;\Lambda(K)
J_0(2\sqrt{KI})\;.\end{aligned}$$

Several signatures of nonclassicality of_the PND are_well known._The most familiar_is the Mandel Q-parameter criterion which_distinguishes (in a_global sense) between super and subpoissonian_PND’s:_$$\begin{aligned}
 Q &=&
((\Delta_n)^2_-\langle_n\rangle )/\langle_n\rangle \\ &=&_(\langle_n^2\rangle _-_\langle n\rangle ^2 -
\langle n\rangle )/\langle_n\rangle_\;,\\ \langle n\rangle  &=&\sum\limits^{\infty}_{n=0} n\;p_n =
\int\limits^{\infty}_{0}_
dI{\cal P}(I) I\;,\\ \langle_n^2\rangle_ &=& \sum\limits^{\infty}_{n=0}
n^2 p_n_= \int\limits