aligned}
 \label{FModelUniformeSimu}
{\mathscr{F}}= \left\{f_{\theta}, \, \theta \in [0.01, 10]\right\} \quad \text{where} \quad f_{\theta} = \theta^{-1}  {\mathbbm{1}}_{[0, \theta]}.\end{aligned}$$ It is worthwhile to notice that $h^2(s,{\mathscr{F}}) = \mathcal{O} (n^{-1})$, which means that $s$ is close to ${\mathscr{F}}$ when $n$ is large, and that our estimator still satisfies ${\mathbb{E}}[h^2 (s,f_{\hat{\theta}})] = \mathcal{O} (n^{-1})$. Contrary to our estimator, the outliers make the m.l.e unstable as shown in the array below.

                                                    $n = 10$   $n = 25$   $n = 50$   $n = 75$   $n = 100$  
  ------------------------------------------------ ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------- --
          $\widehat{R}_N (\hat{\theta}) $             0.20       0.06       0.03       0.02       0.015    
   $\widehat{R}_N (\tilde{\theta}_{\text{mle}}) $     0.57       0.56       0.56       0.56       0.57     

We now propose a second example based on the mixture of two uniform laws. We use the same statistical model ${\mathscr{F}}$ but we modify the distribution of the observations. We take $p \in (0,1)$ and define the true underlying density by $$s_{p} (x) =  (1-p) f_1(x) + p f_2(x) \quad \text{for all $x \in {\mathbb{R}}$.}$$ Set $p_0 = 1-1/\sqrt{2}$. One can check that $$\begin{aligned}
H^2(s_p,{\mathscr{F}}) &=& 
  \begin{cases}
H^2(s_p,f_1) & \text{if $p \leq p_0$} \\
 H^2(s_p,f_2) & \text{if $p > p_0$,}
  \end{cases}  \\
  &=&   \
aligned } 
  \label{FModelUniformeSimu } 
 { \mathscr{F}}= \left\{f_{\theta }, \, \theta \in [ 0.01, 10]\right\ } \quad \text{where } \quad f_{\theta } = \theta^{-1 }   { \mathbbm{1}}_{[0, \theta]}.\end{aligned}$$ It is worthwhile to notice that $ h^2(s,{\mathscr{F } }) = \mathcal{O } (n^{-1})$, which means that $ s$ is close to $ { \mathscr{F}}$ when $ n$ is big, and that our calculator still satisfies $ { \mathbb{E}}[h^2 (s, f_{\hat{\theta } }) ] = \mathcal{O } (n^{-1})$. adverse to our estimator, the outlier make the m.l.e unstable as picture in the array below. 

                                                     $ n = 10 $    $ nitrogen = 25 $    $ n = 50 $    $ n = 75 $    $ normality = 100 $  
   ------------------------------------------------ ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------- -- 
           $ \widehat{R}_N (\hat{\theta }) $              0.20        0.06        0.03        0.02        0.015    
    $ \widehat{R}_N (\tilde{\theta}_{\text{mle } }) $      0.57        0.56        0.56        0.56        0.57     

 We now propose a second exemplar free-base on the mixture of two uniform laws. We use the same statistical exemplar $ { \mathscr{F}}$ but we modify the distribution of the observations. We take $ phosphorus \in (0,1)$ and define the true implicit in density by $ $ s_{p } (x) =   (1 - phosphorus) f_1(x) + p f_2(x) \quad \text{for all $ x \in { \mathbb{R}}$.}$$ fix $ p_0 = 1 - 1/\sqrt{2}$. One can check that $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 H^2(s_p,{\mathscr{F } }) & = & 
   \begin{cases } 
 H^2(s_p, f_1) & \text{if $ p \leq p_0 $ } \\ 
  H^2(s_p, f_2) & \text{if $ p > p_0 $, } 
   \end{cases }   \\ 
   & = &    \
alihned}
 \label{FModelUniformeRimu}
{\mathscr{F}}= \leyr\{f_{\thete}, \, \thetz \in [0.01, 10]\rieht\} \quad \text{where} \quad f_{\theva} = \rheta^{-1}  {\mathbbm{1}}_{[0, \theta]}.\end{aligved}$$ It is worthwhule uo notice that $h^2(s,{\mathscr{F}}) = \mathdwl{O} (u^{-1})$, xhich means thaj $s$ is close to ${\mathscr{F}}$ wvev $u$ is large, and that our estimator styll satosvies ${\mathbb{E}}[h^2 (f,f_{\hau{\thqta}})] = \mathcal{O} (n^{-1})$. Contrary to our estimafor, the outliers makr the m.l.e unstable as showj in the array below.

                                                    $h = 10$   $n = 25$   $n = 50$   $n = 75$   $n = 100$  
  ------------------------------------------------ ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------- --
          $\wudejdt{R}_N (\hat{\theva}) $             0.20       0.06       0.03       0.02       0.015    
   $\wieehat{R}_N (\tilde{\theta}_{\texv{mle}}) $     0.57       0.56       0.56       0.56       0.57     

We noq propove a secubd dxajpke based on the mixtude of two ubiform laws. We use uhe wame statistidal moqej ${\mathscr{F}}$ but we modify the distributimn kf the observations. We rake $p \in (0,1)$ and define the true underlying density by $$s_{p} (x) =  (1-p) f_1(x) + p f_2(x) \quad \texd{for elu $x \ik {\magybh{R}}$.}$$ Set $p_0 = 1-1/\sqrt{2}$. One can check that $$\begin{aligneq}
G^2(s_k,{\manhscr{F}}) &=& 
  \begin{cafes}
H^2(s_p,f_1) & \tect{lf $k \leq p_0$} \\
 H^2(s_p,f_2) & \text{iy $p > p_0$,}
  \end{cases}  \\
  &=&   \
aligned} \label{FModelUniformeSimu} {\mathscr{F}}= \left\{f_{\theta}, \, \theta \in \quad \quad f_{\theta} \theta^{-1} {\mathbbm{1}}_{[0, \theta]}.\end{aligned}$$ that = \mathcal{O} (n^{-1})$, means that $s$ close to ${\mathscr{F}}$ when $n$ is and that our estimator still satisfies ${\mathbb{E}}[h^2 (s,f_{\hat{\theta}})] = \mathcal{O} (n^{-1})$. Contrary to estimator, the outliers make the m.l.e unstable as shown in the array below. = $n 25$ = 50$ $n = 75$ $n = 100$ ------------------------------------------------ ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------- -- $\widehat{R}_N $ 0.20 0.06 0.03 0.02 0.015 $\widehat{R}_N (\tilde{\theta}_{\text{mle}}) 0.57 0.56 0.56 0.56 We now propose a second based the mixture two laws. use the same model ${\mathscr{F}}$ but we modify the distribution of the observations. We take $p \in (0,1)$ and define true underlying $$s_{p} (x) (1-p) + f_2(x) \quad \text{for \in {\mathbb{R}}$.}$$ Set $p_0 = 1-1/\sqrt{2}$. that $$\begin{aligned} H^2(s_p,{\mathscr{F}}) &=& \begin{cases} H^2(s_p,f_1) & \text{if \leq p_0$} H^2(s_p,f_2) & \text{if $p > p_0$,} \\ &=& \
aligned}
 \label{FModelUniformESimu}
{\mathsCr{F}}= \leFt\{f_{\TheTa}, \, \ThetA \in [0.01, 10]\rIght\} \quad \text{whERe} \quAd f_{\theta} = \theta^{-1}  {\mathbbm{1}}_{[0, \thEta]}.\enD{aLIgneD}$$ it Is worThwhile TO nOTIce ThAt $H^2(s,{\mAtHScR{F}}) = \matHcaL{O} (n^{-1})$, whicH means that $S$ is ClOse to ${\mathscr{f}}$ WhEn $n$ is large, And That our estimAtoR still SaTisFIes ${\maThbB{E}}[h^2 (s,f_{\Hat{\theTA}})] = \mathcAl{O} (n^{-1})$. ContrArY To our eSTimator, THE oUtliErs make the m.l.e unstABlE As shown in the arRay belOw.

                                                    $N = 10$   $N = 25$   $n = 50$   $N = 75$   $N = 100$  
  ------------------------------------------------ ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------- --
          $\WidEhaT{R}_N (\hat{\thetA}) $             0.20       0.06       0.03       0.02       0.015    
   $\wIdehaT{r}_N (\tilde{\THeTA}_{\TExt{MLe}}) $     0.57       0.56       0.56       0.56       0.57     

We now proposE a second exaMPle Based oN tHe mIXture oF two uNiFOrm Laws. We use thE samE statistiCal modEL ${\mathscR{f}}$ but we mOdify tHe dIstRibuTIoN oF thE oBSerVAtIonS. we tAke $p \in (0,1)$ anD dEfIne thE truE UNDErlyIng DensIty by $$S_{p} (x) =  (1-p) f_1(x) + p f_2(x) \quad \TexT{for ALl $x \In {\matHbb{R}}$.}$$ SEt $p_0 = 1-1/\sQrT{2}$. One cAn checK that $$\BeGin{aligned}
H^2(s_p,{\maThscR{F}}) &=& 
  \begin{caSes}
h^2(s_P,f_1) & \tExT{if $p \lEQ p_0$} \\
 H^2(s_p,f_2) & \TexT{if $P > p_0$,}
  \end{caSes}  \\
  &=&   \
aligned}
 \label{FModelUni formeSimu} 
{\ma ths cr{ F} }= \ left \{f_{\theta},\ , \t heta \in [0.01, 10]\ri ght\}  \ q uad\ te xt{wh ere} \q u ad f _{\ th et a}=\ th eta^{ -1}   {\mat hbbm{1}}_{ [0,  \ theta]}.\end { al igned}$$ I t i s worthwhile  to  notic etha t  $h^2 (s, {\mat hscr{F } }) = \ mathcal{O }( n^{-1} ) $, whic h me ansthat $s$ is close to ${\mathscr{F}} $ when  $ n $i s  la rge , and that  o ur es t imators ti l l sat i sfies ${\math bb{E}}[h^2( s,f _{\hat {\ the t a}})]= \ma th c al{ O} (n^{-1}) $. C ontrary t o oure stimato r , the o utlier s m ake  the m. l. e u ns t abl e  a s s h own  in thear ra y bel ow.                                       $ n =10 $   $ n = 25 $   $ n= 50$   $n = 75 $  $n = 100$    --- -- ----- - ------ --- --- ------- ------- - --- -- - - - --  ---------- ------ -- - -  - -------- - ---- - -- -- -  ------- -- ----
      $\ w id ehat{R}_ N (\ha t {\ th eta}) $          0.2 0     0. 06      0.03    0.02       0.0 1 5    
   $\wi d eh a t {R } _N ( \ti lde{\theta} _{\t e xt{m le}} )  $    0.57      0 .5 6        0.56       0 .5 6      0.5 7     

We no w proposea s econd ex ampl e  b a sed on the mix tureof two uni f orm laws . Weuse thesame stat i s tical mo del  ${ \ma ths c r {F }}$ but we mo d i fy t he  distri but ion ofthe  ob ser vat io ns. We ta ke $p \i n(0 ,1 )$  an d def i ne the t ru e u nd erl yingd ensity  by $ $s_{ p}  ( x ) =   (1-p) f_ 1 ( x) +  p  f _2(x ) \ qu ad \t ext{ f orall $x\in {\mat hbb { R}}$ .} $$  Set $p _0 = 1-1/\sqr t{ 2}$. One c an  ch eck th a t  $$\begi n{aligned}
H^2(s_p,{\ma t hscr{F} })&=&   \b egin{case s}H^2(s_ p,f _ 1) & \ text{i f $p\l eqp _ 0$} \ \  H ^2( s_ p,f_2) & \ t e xt{ if $p  >  p_0 $,}
  \ end{cases}  \\
  & = &  \
aligned}
 \label{FModelUniformeSimu}
{\mathscr{F}}=_\left\{f_{\theta}, \,_\theta \in [0.01, 10]\right\}_\quad \text{where}_\quad_f_{\theta} =_\theta^{-1}_ {\mathbbm{1}}_{[0, \theta]}.\end{aligned}$$_It is worthwhile_to notice that $h^2(s,{\mathscr{F}})_= \mathcal{O} (n^{-1})$,_which_means that $s$ is close to ${\mathscr{F}}$ when $n$ is large, and that our_estimator_still satisfies_${\mathbb{E}}[h^2_(s,f_{\hat{\theta}})]_= \mathcal{O} (n^{-1})$. Contrary to_our estimator, the outliers make_the m.l.e_unstable as shown in the array below.

 __  _        _     _  ___   _     _     _      _   $n = 10$_  $n = 25$_ _$n = 50$  _$n = 75$_ _$n = 100$_ 
  ------------------------------------------------ ---------- ----------_---------- ---------- -----------_--
     __  _$\widehat{R}_N_(\hat{\theta})_$ _  __ __    0.20 __    0.06  _   _0.03_   _  0.02  _    0.015 _ _
 _ $\widehat{R}_N (\tilde{\theta}_{\text{mle}}) $     0.57  _    0.56 _   _ 0.56__  __ 0.56_      0.57_ _  

We now propose a_second example based on_the_mixture of two uniform laws. We_use the same statistical model ${\mathscr{F}}$_but we modify the distribution_of_the_observations. We take $p \in_(0,1)$ and define the true underlying_density by $$s_{p}_(x) =  (1-p) f_1(x) + p_f_2(x)_\quad \text{for all $x \in {\mathbb{R}}$.}$$_Set_$p_0 = 1-1/\sqrt{2}$. One can check_that_$$\begin{aligned}
H^2(s_p,{\mathscr{F}})_&=& 
  \begin{cases}
H^2(s_p,f_1) &_\text{if $p \leq p_0$} \\
 H^2(s_p,f_2)_& \text{if $p > p_0$,}
  \end{cases}  \\
_ &=& _ \