Homeo}}_+({\mathbb{R}})$, endowed with the compact-open topology; let $\mathsf{Rep}_\#(G,{\mathsf{Homeo}}_+({\mathbb{R}}))$ be the subspace of representations with no global fixed points.

A representation $\rho \in \mathsf{Rep}_\#(G,{\mathsf{Homeo}}_+({\mathbb{R}}))$ is said to be *flexible* if every open neighborhood of $\rho$ in $ \mathsf{Rep}_\#(G,{\mathsf{Homeo}}_+({\mathbb{R}}))$ contains a representation that is not semi-conjugate to $\rho$.

The following lemma is implicit in work of Navas [@NavasFourier] as well as in [@RivasLO]. An explicit proof can be found in [@ABR Prop. 2.8].

\[r:Flexible\] Let $G$ be a discrete, countable group and let $\rho_0$ be the dynamical realization of an order $\preceq$ with basepoint $x\in {\mathbb{R}}$. If $\rho_0$ is flexible, then $\preceq$ is non-isolated in $\operatorname{\mathsf{LO}}(G)$.

Though not needed for our work here, we note that a precise characterization of isolated circular and linear orders in terms of a strong form of rigidity (i.e. strong non-flexibility) of their dynamical realizations is given in [@MR].

As mentioned in the introduction, in order to prove Theorem \[LO\_thm\] we use the relationship between circular orders on groups and linear orders on their central extensions by ${\mathbb{Z}}$. For this purpose, we need the notion of [*cofinal elements*]{}.

An element $h$ in a linearly-ordered group $(G, \preceq)$ is called *cofinal* if $$\label{eq:cofinal}
\text{for all $g\in G$,
there exist $m,n\in{\mathbb{Z}}$ such that $h^m \preceq g \preceq h^n$.}$$

\[r:cofinal\] Cofinal elements also have a characterization in terms of the dynamical realization: If $\rho$ is a dynamical realization of $\preceq$ with basepoint $x$, then $h \in G$ is cofinal if and only if $\rho(h)$ has no fixed point. Indeed
Homeo}}_+({\mathbb{R}})$, endowed with the compact - open topology; lease $ \mathsf{Rep}_\#(G,{\mathsf{Homeo}}_+({\mathbb{R}}))$ be the subspace of representation with no global specify point. 

 A representation $ \rho \in \mathsf{Rep}_\#(G,{\mathsf{Homeo}}_+({\mathbb{R}}))$ is said to be * compromising * if every receptive neighborhood of $ \rho$ in $ \mathsf{Rep}_\#(G,{\mathsf{Homeo}}_+({\mathbb{R}}))$ incorporate a representation that is not semi - conjugate to $ \rho$. 

 The following lemma is implicit in oeuvre of Navas [ @NavasFourier ] as well as in [ @RivasLO ]. An explicit validation can be found in [ @ABR Prop.   2.8 ]. 

 \[r: Flexible\ ] Let $ G$ be a discrete, countable group and let $ \rho_0 $ be the dynamical realization of an order   $ \preceq$ with basepoint $ x\in { \mathbb{R}}$. If $ \rho_0 $ is flexible, then $ \preceq$ is non - isolated in $ \operatorname{\mathsf{LO}}(G)$. 

 Though not necessitate for our work here, we note that a precise portrayal of isolated circular and linear orders in footing of a strong form of rigidity (i.e.   strong non - flexibility) of their dynamic realizations is given in [ @MR ]. 

 As mentioned in the introduction, in order to prove Theorem   \[LO\_thm\ ] we practice the kinship between round orders on groups and linear orders on their central extensions by $ { \mathbb{Z}}$. For this purpose, we necessitate the impression of [ * cofinal component * ] { }. 

 An element $ h$ in a linearly - arrange group $ (G, \preceq)$ is call * cofinal * if $ $ \label{eq: cofinal } 
 \text{for all $ g\in G$, 
 there exist $ m, n\in{\mathbb{Z}}$ such that $ h^m \preceq g \preceq h^n$.}$$ 

 \[r: cofinal\ ] Cofinal elements also accept a characterization in terms of the dynamical realization: If $ \rho$ is a dynamical realization of $ \preceq$ with basepoint $ x$, then $ planck's constant \in G$ is cofinal if and only if $ \rho(h)$ has no fixed point. Indeed
Homfo}}_+({\mathbb{R}})$, endowed with tme compact-open topology; let $\mzthsf{Rep}_\#(E,{\mathsf{Homeo}}_+({\mathbb{R}}))$ be the snbspqce od representations with no globap fixed poinus.

A representatioi $\rho \in \mathsr{Vep}_\#(G,{\mctisf{Homeo}}_+({\mathbb{R}}))$ is said tm be *flexible* hf erery open neighborhood of $\rho$ in $ \maehsf{Rep}_\#(B,{\mwthsf{Homeo}}_+({\mathfb{R}}))$ bogtaihs a representation that is not seji-conjujate to $\rho$.

The gollowing lemma is implicih in work of Navas [@NavwsFourier] aw wejo as in [@RivarLO]. An explicit proof dan be found in [@ABR Prop. 2.8].

\[r:Flexibue\] Lec $G$ be a diwceetf, countable jroup wnd let $\rho_0$ nv the dfnamicak realization pf en oeder $\preceq$ with basepmint $x\in {\mathbb{R}}$. Is $\rho_0$ is xlzxible, then $\preceq$ is nin-isonateg in $\ipefatkriams{\mathsv{LO}}(J)$.

Though not needed for our work here, we nptq that a preciae chawasterization of isolated circular and litead orders in terms of a wtrong form of rigidijy (i.e. strond non-flexibility) of their dynamical realizations hs gitev iu [@MR].

As nejtioned in the introduction, in order to prove Fhtorvm \[LO\_thm\] we use thc relationship beteefn sircular ordets on gxkuls and linear ordegs on treir xentral evtenxions by ${\mathbb{Z}}$. For this pyrpose, we nevd tye notion of [*cofincl elements*]{}.

Au elemgnt $h$ on a linearly-ordered gruup $(F, \preceq)$ is called *ckwinal* if $$\label{eq:zofpnal}
\dext{for all $g\in G$,
there exift $m,n\in{\mavhbb{Z}}$ such tfat $n^m \preseq g \precfq h^n$.}$$

\[v:wofinal\] Cofinal elfmentd dlso have w characterization in terms of vie dynamical teanizdtion: If $\rho$ ls a dynamical wealization of $\preceq$ with basepoint $x$, then $h \in G$ is sofinal if ang only if $\rho(i)$ has no sixee pount. Indddd
Homeo}}_+({\mathbb{R}})$, endowed with the compact-open topology; let the of representations no global fixed \mathsf{Rep}_\#(G,{\mathsf{Homeo}}_+({\mathbb{R}}))$ said to be if every open of $\rho$ in $ \mathsf{Rep}_\#(G,{\mathsf{Homeo}}_+({\mathbb{R}}))$ contains representation that is not semi-conjugate to $\rho$. The following lemma is implicit in of Navas [@NavasFourier] as well as in [@RivasLO]. An explicit proof can be in Prop. \[r:Flexible\] $G$ be a discrete, countable group and let $\rho_0$ be the dynamical realization of an order with basepoint $x\in {\mathbb{R}}$. If $\rho_0$ is flexible, $\preceq$ is non-isolated in Though not needed for our here, note that precise of circular and linear in terms of a strong form of rigidity (i.e. strong non-flexibility) of their dynamical realizations is given [@MR]. As the introduction, order prove \[LO\_thm\] we use between circular orders on groups and their central extensions by ${\mathbb{Z}}$. For this purpose, need the of [*cofinal elements*]{}. An element $h$ a linearly-ordered group $(G, \preceq)$ is called *cofinal* $$\label{eq:cofinal} \text{for all $g\in G$, there exist $m,n\in{\mathbb{Z}}$ such that $h^m \preceq g \preceq h^n$.}$$ elements also have a in terms of dynamical If is dynamical realization $\preceq$ with basepoint $x$, then $h \in G$ is cofinal if only if $\rho(h)$ has no fixed point. Indeed
Homeo}}_+({\mathbb{R}})$, endowed with thE compact-opEn topOloGy; lEt $\MathSf{ReP}_\#(G,{\mathsf{Homeo}}_+({\mAThbb{r}}))$ be the subspace of represEntatIoNS witH No GlobaL fixed pOInTS.

a rePrEsEntAtIOn $\Rho \in \MatHsf{Rep}_\#(G,{\Mathsf{HomeO}}_+({\maThBb{R}}))$ is said to bE *FlExible* if evEry Open neighborHooD of $\rho$ In $ \MatHSf{Rep}_\#(g,{\maThsf{HOmeo}}_+({\maTHbb{R}}))$ coNtains a rePrESentatIOn that iS NOt Semi-Conjugate to $\rho$.

The FOlLOwing lemma is imPlicit In WOrK OF NaVas [@navasFouriEr] As welL As in [@RivASLo]. aN ExpLIcit proof can bE found in [@ABR pRop. 2.8].

\[R:FlexiBlE\] LeT $g$ be a diScretE, cOUntAble group anD let $\Rho_0$ be the dYnamicAL realizATion of aN order $\PreCeq$ With BAsEpOinT $x\IN {\maTHbB{R}}$. IF $\Rho_0$ Is flexibLe, ThEn $\preCeq$ iS NON-IsolAteD in $\oPeratOrname{\mathsf{Lo}}(G)$.

THougH Not NeedeD for oUr woRk Here, wE note tHat a pReCise characterizAtioN of isolatEd cIrCulAr And liNEar ordErs In tErms of a Strong fORm oF rIGIDiTy (i.e. strong non-flexiBiLITy) Of their dYnamicAL rEaLIzations Is GivEn in [@mr].

as menTionED iN the intrOductiON, iN oRder to pRoVe TheoReM \[LO\_Thm\] We use THe reLationShip betwEen ciRCular orders on gROups and linear ORdERS oN TheiR ceNtral extensIons BY ${\matHbb{Z}}$. fOr ThiS PurpoSe, we nEeD ThE Notion of [*cofinal elemEnTs*]{}.

An elEment $H$ in a linearly-oRdered grouP $(g, \PReceq)$ is cAlleD *CoFInal* if $$\label{eq:cOfinaL}
\text{for alL $G\in G$,
therE exisT $m,n\in{\matHbb{Z}}$ such tHAT $h^m \preceQ g \pRecEq h^N$.}$$

\[r:cOFInAl\] Cofinal elemENTs alSo Have a chAraCterizaTioN in TerMs oF tHe dynamicAl realizAtIoN: IF $\rHo$ iS a dynAMical reaLiZatIoN of $\PreceQ$ With baSepoiNt $x$, tHeN $h \IN G$ iS cofinaL If AND onlY iF $\rHo(h)$ hAs nO fIxed pOint. iNdeEd
Homeo}}_+({\mathbb{R}})$,endowed wi th th e c omp ac t-op en t opology; let $ \ math sf{Rep}_\#(G,{\mathsf{ Homeo }} _ +({\ m at hbb{R }}))$ b e  t h e  su bs pa ceof re prese nta tions w ith no glo bal  f ixed points. 
A  represent ati on $\rho \in  \m athsf{ Re p}_ \ #(G,{ \ma thsf{ Homeo} } _+({\m athbb{R}} )) $  is sa i d to be * fl exib le* if every open ne i ghborhood of $ \rho$in $\ m ath sf{ Rep}_\#(G, {\ maths f {Homeo} } _+ ( { \ mat h bb{R}}))$ con tains a rep r ese ntatio ntha t  is no t sem i- c onj ugate to $\ rho$ .

The fo llowin g  lemmai s impli cit in  wo rkof N a va s[@N av a sFo u ri er] aswell asin  [ @Riva sLO] . A n  exp lic it p roofcan be foundin[@AB R  Pr op. 2 .8].
\[r :F lexib le\] L et $G $be a discrete,coun table gro upan d l et  $\rh o _0$ be  th e d ynamica l reali z ati on o f  a n order $\preceq$wi t h  b asepoint  $x\in {\ ma t hbb{R}}$ .If$\rh o _ 0$ is  fle x ib le, then  $\pre c eq $is non- is olated  i n $ \op erato r name {\math sf{LO}}( G)$.Though not nee d ed for our wo r kh e re ,  wenot e that a pr ecis e  cha ract e ri zat i on of  isol at e dc ircular and linearor ders i n ter ms of a stron g form ofr i g idity (i .e.s tr o ng non-flexibi lity)  of theird ynamical  real izations  is given i n [@MR]. 

A s m ent ion e d  i n the introdu c t ion,  i n order  to  proveThe ore m \ [LO \_ thm\] weuse there la ti on shi p bet w een circ ul aror der s ong roupsand l inea ror d ers  on the i rc e ntra lex tens ion sby ${ \mat h bb{ Z}}$. F or this p urp o se,we  n eed the  notion of [* co final elem en ts* ]{}.
A n  element  $h$ in a linearly-orde r ed grou p $ (G, \ prec eq)$ is c all ed *co fin a l* if$$\lab el{eq :c ofi n a l}
\t e x t{ for  a ll $g\in G $ , 
th ere e xi st $ m,n\in{ \mathbb{Z}}$ sucht hat  $h^m \preceq  g\pre c e qh^n $ .} $ $
\[ r :co f i nal\] Cofinal e lements al so ha ve a chara c ter iz ation i n terms  of t h e dynam ical real ization:If  $\r h o $ i s a dynami cal real ization o f  $\pr e ce q$ wi thbasepo in t $ x$, t hen $h \in  G$ i s cofi na l if a nd on ly  if $\rh o(h)$ has no fixed poin t. Ind eed
Homeo}}_+({\mathbb{R}})$, endowed_with the_compact-open topology; let $\mathsf{Rep}_\#(G,{\mathsf{Homeo}}_+({\mathbb{R}}))$_be the_subspace_of representations_with_no global fixed_points.

A representation $\rho_\in \mathsf{Rep}_\#(G,{\mathsf{Homeo}}_+({\mathbb{R}}))$ is said_to be *flexible*_if_every open neighborhood of $\rho$ in $ \mathsf{Rep}_\#(G,{\mathsf{Homeo}}_+({\mathbb{R}}))$ contains a representation that is not_semi-conjugate_to $\rho$.

The_following_lemma_is implicit in work of_Navas [@NavasFourier] as well as_in [@RivasLO]._An explicit proof can be found in [@ABR_Prop. 2.8].

\[r:Flexible\]_Let $G$ be_a discrete, countable group and let $\rho_0$ be the_dynamical realization of an order $\preceq$ with_basepoint $x\in {\mathbb{R}}$._If_$\rho_0$_is flexible, then $\preceq$_is non-isolated in $\operatorname{\mathsf{LO}}(G)$.

Though not needed_for our work here, we note_that a precise characterization of isolated circular_and linear orders in terms of_a strong form of rigidity_(i.e. strong non-flexibility)_of their dynamical realizations is_given in [@MR].

As_mentioned in_the introduction, in_order to prove Theorem \[LO\_thm\] we use_the relationship between_circular orders on groups and linear_orders_on their central_extensions_by_${\mathbb{Z}}$. For_this purpose, we_need_the notion_of_[*cofinal elements*]{}.

An element $h$ in a_linearly-ordered_group $(G, \preceq)$ is called *cofinal* if_$$\label{eq:cofinal}
\text{for all $g\in G$,
there_exist_$m,n\in{\mathbb{Z}}$ such that $h^m_\preceq g \preceq h^n$.}$$

\[r:cofinal\] Cofinal_elements also have a characterization in_terms of_the dynamical_realization: If $\rho$ is a dynamical realization of $\preceq$ with basepoint_$x$, then $h \in G$ is_cofinal if and only_if $\rho(h)$_has_no fixed point._Indeed