 modes and complete list of references see Ref. [@Schael:2006cr].

[*Light CP even Higgs:*]{} One of the strongest limits on the CP even Higgs boson comes from the search for $h \to b \bar b$. The limit for $m_h \lesssim 60$ GeV is $C_{ZZh} B(h \to b \bar b) \lesssim 0.04$. In order to satisfy this limit we need $B (h \to A A) \gtrsim 96 \%$. This is not impossible, but it is not generically (in large regions of SUSY parameter space) satisfied (\[eq:Bh\]). With generic $B (h \to b \bar b) \simeq 10 \%$ we need $m_h \gtrsim 85$ GeV or somewhat reduced $C_{ZZh}$. Note also that combined $h \to b \bar b$ and $h \to AA \to 4b$ limit requires $m_h > 110$ GeV for $C_{ZZh} \simeq 1$. Thus $m_A < 10$ GeV is favored. For $m_A < 10$ GeV the limits on the dominant decay mode $h \to AA$ are not so strong since it is spread over several final states: $h \to AA \to 2\tau 2c, 4\tau, 4c, \dots$ with about 36%, 23%, 14%, $\dots$ branching ratios. These limits can be satisfied for any $m_h$ provided $m_A\gtrsim 9$ GeV with limits weakening for heavier $h$ and completely expiring for $m_h \gtrsim 86$ GeV [@Jack_TeV4LHC].

The limits from $e^+ e^- \to hA$ are typically comfortably satisfied for masses and branching ratios of interest as a consequence of a very small $C_{ZAh}$. The strongest limit comes from $hA \to AAA \to 6 \tau$ which for $m_A \simeq 10$ GeV and $m_h = 40 - 60$ GeV requires $C_{ZAh} \lesssim 0.07$ and this limit runs out for $m_h \simeq 65$ GeV. A comparable constraint on $C_{ZAh}$ comes from the $Z$-width measurement for $m_h = 40$ GeV and it becomes weaker for larger $m_h$.

We see that this scenario can avoid
modes and complete list of references visualize Ref.   [ @Schael:2006cr ]. 

 [ * Light CP even Higgs :* ] { } One of the hard limits on the CP even Higgs boson come from the search for $ h \to b \bar b$. The terminus ad quem for $ m_h \lesssim 60 $ GeV is $ C_{ZZh } B(h \to b \bar b) \lesssim 0.04$. In order to satisfy this limit we necessitate $ B (h \to A A) \gtrsim 96 \%$. This is not impossible, but it is not generically (in large region of SUSY parameter space) meet   (\[eq: Bh\ ]). With generic $ B (h \to b \bar b) \simeq 10 \%$ we need $ m_h \gtrsim 85 $ GeV or slightly reduced $ C_{ZZh}$. Note also that combined $ h \to b \bar b$ and $ h \to AA \to 4b$ terminus ad quem requires $ m_h > 110 $ GeV for $ C_{ZZh } \simeq 1$. Thus $ m_A < 10 $ GeV is favored. For $ m_A < 10 $ GeV the terminus ad quem on the dominant decay mode $ h \to AA$ are not thus strong since it is unfold over several final states: $ h \to AA \to 2\tau 2c, 4\tau, 4c, \dots$ with about 36% , 23% , 14% , $ \dots$ ramify ratios. These limits can be satisfied for any $ m_h$ provided $ m_A\gtrsim 9 $ GeV with limits weakening for heavier $ h$ and completely expiring for $ m_h \gtrsim 86 $ GeV   [ @Jack_TeV4LHC ]. 

 The limits from $ e^+ e^- \to hA$ are typically comfortably satisfied for masses and branching ratios of interest as a consequence of a very small $ C_{ZAh}$. The strong limit comes from $ hA \to AAA \to 6 \tau$ which for $ m_A \simeq 10 $ GeV and $ m_h = 40 - 60 $ GeV want $ C_{ZAh } \lesssim 0.07 $ and this terminus ad quem range out for $ m_h \simeq 65 $ GeV. A comparable constraint on $ C_{ZAh}$ comes from the $ Z$-width measurement for $ m_h = 40 $ GeV and it become weaker for larger $ m_h$. 

 We see that this scenario can avoid
 mofes and complete list of references see Ref. [@Scheel:2006cr].

[*Lifht CP exen Higgs:*]{} One of the strongedt limiuf on the CP even Hkggs bosoj comes drom rhe search for $h \to b \bad b$. Tke limit for $m_h \kesssim 60$ GaV is $C_{ZZh} B(h \do b \bar b) \lesssim 0.04$. In order to satisfy this lomlt we need $B (h \to S A) \gfgslm 96 \%$. This is not impossible, but jt is nmt genericallu (in large regions of SUSY parwmeter space) satisvied (\[eq:Bh\]). Wijg gqberic $B (h \to b \bar b) \spkeq 10 \%$ we nged $m_h \gtrsim 85$ GeV or somewhat rdduceb $C_{ZZh}$. Note aoso jhat combinev $h \to b \bar b$ and $h \to AA \to 4b$ lomit requires $k_h > 110$ GwV for $C_{ZZh} \simeq 1$. Thns $m_A < 10$ GeV is favorgd. For $m_A < 10$ YeV the limits on the diminatt dacay nodd $h \tp ZA$ are nov so strong since it iw spread over seversl dinal states: $g \to AW \eo 2\tau 2c, 4\tau, 4c, \dots$ with about 36%, 23%, 14%, $\dots$ trahching ratios. These limuts can be satisfied vor any $m_r$ provided $m_A\gtrsim 9$ GeV with limits weakening fos heatidr $k$ and zimoletely expiring for $m_h \gtrsim 86$ GeV [@Jack_TeV4LHC].

Ege lpmits from $e^+ e^- \to hA$ are typocwlki comfortably ratisfnsd for masses and brwnching ratiis of inttrest as a consequence of a very small $C_{ZAh}$. Nhe wtrongest limit coles from $hA \to SAA \tp 6 \tau$ which for $m_A \simzq 10$ GeB and $m_h = 40 - 60$ GeV reqhkres $C_{ZAh} \lesssio 0.07$ sng this limit runs out for $i_h \simeq 65$ GeV. A compxrabke conftraint on $C_{ZAh}$ comes from the $Z$-wifth mgasurekent for $m_j = 40$ GeV and it becomes weaker for larger $m_h$.

We sae nhat this scensrio can avoiq
modes and complete list of references see [*Light even Higgs:*]{} of the strongest Higgs comes from the for $h \to \bar b$. The limit for $m_h 60$ GeV is $C_{ZZh} B(h \to b \bar b) \lesssim 0.04$. In order satisfy this limit we need $B (h \to A A) \gtrsim 96 \%$. is impossible, it not generically (in large regions of SUSY parameter space) satisfied (\[eq:Bh\]). With generic $B (h \to \bar b) \simeq 10 \%$ we need $m_h 85$ GeV or somewhat $C_{ZZh}$. Note also that combined \to \bar b$ $h AA 4b$ limit requires > 110$ GeV for $C_{ZZh} \simeq 1$. Thus $m_A < 10$ GeV is favored. For $m_A < GeV the the dominant mode \to are not so it is spread over several final AA \to 2\tau 2c, 4\tau, 4c, \dots$ with 36%, 23%, $\dots$ branching ratios. These limits can satisfied for any $m_h$ provided $m_A\gtrsim 9$ GeV limits weakening for heavier $h$ and completely expiring for $m_h \gtrsim 86$ GeV [@Jack_TeV4LHC]. The $e^+ e^- \to hA$ typically comfortably satisfied masses branching of as a of a very small $C_{ZAh}$. The strongest limit comes from $hA AAA \to 6 \tau$ which for $m_A \simeq 10$ GeV = - 60$ GeV $C_{ZAh} \lesssim 0.07$ and limit out for $m_h \simeq A constraint from $Z$-width for $m_h = 40$ and it becomes weaker for $m_h$. We see that
 modes and complete list of refErences see ref. [@ScHaeL:2006cr].

[*liGht Cp eveN Higgs:*]{} One of the STronGest limits on the CP even HIggs bOsON comES fRom thE search FOr $H \TO b \bAr B$. THe lImIT fOr $m_h \lEssSim 60$ GeV iS $C_{ZZh} B(h \to b \Bar B) \lEsssim 0.04$. In ordeR To Satisfy thiS liMit we need $B (h \tO A A) \Gtrsim 96 \%$. thIs iS Not imPosSible, But it iS Not genErically (iN lARge regIOns of SUsy PaRameTer space) satisfied (\[EQ:BH\]). with generic $B (h \tO b \bar b) \SiMEq 10 \%$ WE NeeD $m_h \Gtrsim 85$ GeV oR sOmewhAT reduceD $c_{ZzH}$. nOte ALso that combinEd $h \to b \bar b$ aND $h \tO AA \to 4b$ LiMit REquireS $m_h > 110$ Gev fOR $C_{Zzh} \simeq 1$. Thus $M_A < 10$ Gev is favoreD. For $m_A < 10$ gEV the liMIts on thE dominAnt DecAy moDE $h \To aA$ aRe NOt sO StRonG SinCe it is spReAd Over sEverAL FINal sTatEs: $h \tO AA \to 2\Tau 2c, 4\tau, 4c, \dots$ wIth AbouT 36%, 23%, 14%, $\DotS$ branChing RatiOs. these Limits Can be SaTisfied for any $m_h$ ProvIded $m_A\gtrSim 9$ gev wiTh LimitS WeakenIng For Heavier $H$ and comPLetElY EXPiRing for $m_h \gtrsim 86$ GeV [@jaCK_tev4LHC].

The lImits fROm $E^+ e^- \TO hA$ are tyPiCalLy coMFOrtabLy saTIsFied for mAsses aND bRaNching rAtIos of iNtEreSt aS a conSEqueNce of a Very smalL $C_{ZAh}$. tHe strongest limIT comes from $hA \tO aAa \TO 6 \tAU$ whiCh fOr $m_A \simeq 10$ Gev and $M_H = 40 - 60$ GeV RequIReS $C_{ZaH} \lessSim 0.07$ anD tHIs LImit runs out for $m_h \simEq 65$ geV. A coMparaBle constraint On $C_{ZAh}$ comeS FROm the $Z$-wiDth mEAsURement for $m_h = 40$ GeV And it Becomes weaKEr for larGer $m_h$.

we see thaT this scenARIo can avoId
 modes and complete list o f referenc es se e R ef.  [ @Sch ael: 2006cr].

[*Li g ht C P even Higgs:*]{} Oneof th es tron g es t lim its ont he C P e ve nHig gs bo son c ome s fromthe search  fo r$h \to b \ba r  b $. The lim itfor $m_h \le sss im 60$  G eVi s $C_ {ZZ h} B( h \tob  \barb) \lesss im 0.04$. In orde r to  sat isfy this limit w e  n e ed $B (h \to A  A) \g tr s im 9 6 \ %$.  This is n ot  impo s sible,b ut i t  is not generical ly (in larg e  re gionsof  SU S Y para meter  s p ace ) satisfied  (\[ eq:Bh\]).  Withg eneric$ B (h \t o b \b arb)\sim e q10  \% $w e n e ed  $m _ h \ gtrsim 8 5$  G eV or  som e w h a t re duc ed $ C_{ZZ h}$. Note als o t hatc omb ined$h \t o b\b ar b$  and $ h \to  A A \to 4b$ limit  req uires $m_ h >  1 10$  G eV fo r  $C_{Z Zh}  \s imeq 1$ . Thus$ m_A  < 1 0 $GeV is favored. Fo r$ m _A  < 10$ G eV the li mi t s on the  d omi nant d ecaymode $h  \to AA$  are n o tso  strong  s ince i tisspr ead o v er s everal  final s tates :  $h \to AA \to 2\tau 2c, 4\t a u, 4 c, \dot s$with about36%, 23%,  14% ,  $ \do t s$ br anchi ng ra t ios. These limits c an  be sa tisfi ed for any $m _h$ provid e d $m_A\gtr sim9 $G eV with limits  weak ening forh eavier $ h$ an d comple tely expi r i ng for $ m_h  \g trs im8 6 $GeV [@Jack_Te V 4 LHC] .
The li mit s from$e^ + e ^-\to  h A$ are ty picallyco mf or ta bly  sati s fied for  m ass es  an d bra n chingratio s of  i nt e res t as ac on s e quen ce  o f aver ysmall  $C_ { ZAh }$. The  stronges t l i mitco me s from$hA \to AAA \ to  6 \tau$ w hi chfor $m _ A  \simeq10$ GeV and $m_h = 40 - 60$ GeV  re quire s $C _{ZAh} \l ess sim 0. 07$ and th is lim it ru ns  ou t for $ m _ h\si me q 65$ GeV. A  co mpara bl e co nstrain t on $C_{ZAh}$ com e s f rom the $Z$-w idt h me a s ur eme n tf or$m _ h = 4 0$ GeV and it b ecomes wea ke r  f or larger$ m_h $. 

We se e thatthiss cenario  can avoi d
 modes_and complete_list of references see_Ref. [@Schael:2006cr].

[*Light CP_even_Higgs:*]{} One_of_the strongest limits_on the CP_even Higgs boson comes_from the search_for_$h \to b \bar b$. The limit for $m_h \lesssim 60$ GeV is $C_{ZZh}_B(h_\to b_\bar_b)_\lesssim 0.04$. In order to_satisfy this limit we need_$B (h_\to A A) \gtrsim 96 \%$. This is_not_impossible, but it_is not generically (in large regions of SUSY parameter_space) satisfied (\[eq:Bh\]). With generic $B (h_\to b \bar_b)_\simeq_10 \%$ we need_$m_h \gtrsim 85$ GeV or somewhat_reduced $C_{ZZh}$. Note also that combined_$h \to b \bar b$ and $h_\to AA \to 4b$ limit requires_$m_h > 110$ GeV for_$C_{ZZh} \simeq_1$. Thus $m_A < 10$_GeV is favored._For $m_A_< 10$ GeV_the limits on the dominant decay_mode $h \to_AA$ are not so strong since_it_is spread over_several_final_states: $h_\to AA \to_2\tau_2c, 4\tau,_4c,_\dots$ with about 36%, 23%, 14%,_$\dots$_branching ratios. These limits can be satisfied_for any $m_h$ provided_$m_A\gtrsim_9$ GeV with limits_weakening for heavier $h$ and_completely expiring for $m_h \gtrsim 86$_GeV [@Jack_TeV4LHC].

The limits_from $e^+_e^- \to hA$ are typically comfortably satisfied for masses and branching_ratios of interest as a consequence_of a very small_$C_{ZAh}$. The_strongest_limit comes from_$hA_\to AAA_\to 6 \tau$ which for $m_A \simeq_10$ GeV_and $m_h = 40 - 60$_GeV requires $C_{ZAh} \lesssim_0.07$_and this limit runs out for_$m_h \simeq 65$ GeV. A comparable_constraint on $C_{ZAh}$ comes from_the_$Z$-width_measurement for $m_h = 40$_GeV and it becomes weaker for_larger $m_h$.

We see_that this scenario can avoid