 or theoretical computations. Obviously, the proportionality constant $C$ cannot be determined by the fit. A possible scaling of $R_M$ with $Q^2$ is not considered because of its model dependence, and because of the mild dependence of HERMES $R_M$ data on $Q^2$. As discussed below, the proposed functional form of $\tau$, Eq. , is flexible enough to encompass both absorption models, which assume short production times and in-medium hadronization, and energy loss models, which assume long lived quarks with ${\langle t_p \rangle} \gg R_A$, where $R_A$ is the nuclear radius. The 2 classes of models are distinguished by the value of the scaling exponent: a positive $\lambda \gneqq 0$ is characteristic of absorption models, while a negative $\lambda \lesssim
0$ is characteristic of energy loss models. Thus, the exponent $\lambda$ extracted from experimental data can identify the leading mechanism for hadron suppression in nDIS, and distinguish short from long hadronization time scales.

The scaling of $R_M$ is quite natural in the context of hadron absorption models [@Bialas:1986cf; @Accardi:2002tv; @Accardi:2005jd; @Kopeliovich:2003py; @Falter:2004uc; @Gallmeister:2005ad]. Indeed, prehadron absorption depends on the in-medium prehadron path length, which depends on the prehadron production time ${\langle t_p \rangle}$, as long as ${\langle t_p \rangle}
\lesssim R_A$. In the Lund string model [@Andersson:1983ia] hadronization is modeled by the breaking of the color string stretching from the struck parton to the target remnant. The production time is $$\begin{aligned}
  {\langle t_p \rangle} & = f(z) (1-z) \frac{z E_q}{\kappa_\text{str}} 
 \label{eq:lundest}\end{aligned}$$ where $E_q$ is the struck quark energy, and $\kappa_\text{str}$ the string tension. At leading order (LO) in the Strong coupling constant $\alpha_s$, the partonic subprocess is $\gamma^*+q {{\rightarrow}}q$ and one obtains $$\begin{aligned}
  E_q = \nu \.\end{
or theoretical computations. Obviously, the proportionality constant $ C$ cannot be determined by the paroxysm. A potential scaling of $ R_M$ with $ Q^2 $ is not considered because of its model addiction, and because of the mild addiction of HERMES $ R_M$ data on $ Q^2$. As discussed under, the nominate functional kind of $ \tau$, Eq.  , is flexible enough to encompass both preoccupation models, which assume unretentive product times and in - medium hadronization, and energy loss models, which bear long lived quarks with $ { \langle t_p \rangle } \gg R_A$, where $ R_A$ is the nuclear radius. The 2 course of models are distinguished by the value of the scaling exponent: a positive $ \lambda \gneqq 0 $ is characteristic of assimilation models, while a negative $ \lambda \lesssim 
 0 $ is characteristic of energy loss models. therefore, the exponent $ \lambda$ extracted from experimental data can identify the leading mechanism for hadron suppression in nDIS, and identify short from long hadronization time scales. 

 The scaling of $ R_M$ is quite natural in the context of hadron absorption models [ @Bialas:1986cf; @Accardi:2002tv; @Accardi:2005jd; @Kopeliovich:2003py; @Falter:2004uc; @Gallmeister:2005ad ]. Indeed, prehadron absorption depends on the in - medium prehadron way duration, which depends on the prehadron output meter $ { \langle t_p \rangle}$, as long as $ { \langle t_p \rangle } 
 \lesssim R_A$. In the Lund string model [ @Andersson:1983ia ] hadronization is model by the breakage of the color string stretching from the strike parton to the target remnant. The production time is $ $ \begin{aligned } 
   { \langle t_p \rangle } & = f(z) (1 - omega) \frac{z E_q}{\kappa_\text{str } } 
  \label{eq: lundest}\end{aligned}$$ where $ E_q$ is the struck quark energy, and $ \kappa_\text{str}$ the string tension. At leading order (LO) in the Strong coupling changeless $ \alpha_s$, the partonic subprocess is $ \gamma^*+q { { \rightarrow}}q$ and one obtains $ $ \begin{aligned } 
   E_q = \nu \.\end {
 or theoretical computationr. Obviously, the proporvionalify constxnt $C$ cannot be determined bb thw fit. A possible scaling of $R_M$ with $E^2$ is not conwudered becehse of lcs moscl de'eidence, and becaose of the mhld dependence ow KERMES $R_M$ data on $Q^2$. As discussed beljw, the lrlposed functiogal gjrm kf $\tau$, Eq. , is flexible enough to endompass both absorptoon models, which assume shlrt oroduction times ajd in-medium hadwinization, ana energy loss models, wgich assume long lived quarks wkth ${\lcngle t_p \rabgoe} \hc R_A$, where $C_A$ is nhe nuclear radius. Tha 2 clasxes of models sre diwtinguished by the vanue of the scaling exponent: a positive $\lambda \tnwqq 0$ hs cvarazrerkstjc or absogptmon models, shile a negqtive $\lambda \lesssik
0$ yw characterisfic of egergy loss models. Thus, the exponent $\lamtda$ extracted from experimwntal data can identivy the lewding mechanism for hadron suppression in nDIS, ang disvivgunwh shuet from long hadronization time scales.

The scaligf pf $R_M$ is quite nctural in the comtfxy of hadron abrorption jodels [@Bialas:1986cf; @Acfardi:2002tv; @Accaedi:2005jd; @Koptliovoch:2003py; @Falter:2004uc; @Gallmeister:2005ae]. Indeed, prekadeon absorption depznds on the nn-mediom prenadron path length, whick depehds on the orehadron oroduction time ${\uannle t_p \rangle}$, as long as ${\langje t_p \ranjle}
\lexssim R_X$. In the Ltnd string model [@Andersson:1983ia] hadrojizatnon iv modeled hy the breaking of the color stcmng stretchinb xrok the stxuck psrton to the earget remnant. The prjductkon time ia $$\begin{eligned}
  {\landle t_p \rangle} & = f(z) (1-z) \frac{z E_q}{\kappa_\eext{wtr}} 
 \label{ed:uundest}\end{aligmed}$$ where $E_q$ is the struck quark enerny, ana $\kappa_\text{str}$ tkt surung tension. At lexdigg ocder (JM) in the Strmng zouoking zonstanu $\aooha_s$, the partonic subprowess is $\gamma^*+q {{\rightartor}}q$ and obe obtaigs $$\begin{alignrd}
  E_q = \nu \.\end{
or theoretical computations. Obviously, the proportionality constant be by the A possible scaling not because of its dependence, and because the mild dependence of HERMES $R_M$ on $Q^2$. As discussed below, the proposed functional form of $\tau$, Eq. , flexible enough to encompass both absorption models, which assume short production times and hadronization, energy models, assume long lived quarks with ${\langle t_p \rangle} \gg R_A$, where $R_A$ is the nuclear radius. 2 classes of models are distinguished by the of the scaling exponent: positive $\lambda \gneqq 0$ is of models, while negative \lesssim is characteristic of loss models. Thus, the exponent $\lambda$ extracted from experimental data can identify the leading mechanism for hadron in nDIS, short from hadronization scales. scaling of $R_M$ natural in the context of hadron @Accardi:2002tv; @Accardi:2005jd; @Kopeliovich:2003py; @Falter:2004uc; @Gallmeister:2005ad]. Indeed, prehadron absorption on the prehadron path length, which depends on prehadron production time ${\langle t_p \rangle}$, as long ${\langle t_p \rangle} \lesssim R_A$. In the Lund string model [@Andersson:1983ia] hadronization is modeled by of the color string from the struck to target The time is {\langle t_p \rangle} & = f(z) (1-z) \frac{z E_q}{\kappa_\text{str}} \label{eq:lundest}\end{aligned}$$ where is the struck quark energy, and $\kappa_\text{str}$ the string tension. order in the Strong constant $\alpha_s$, the partonic is {{\rightarrow}}q$ and one obtains = \.\end{
 or theoretical computations. obviously, tHe proPorTioNaLity ConsTant $C$ cannot be dETermIned by the fit. A possible sCalinG oF $r_M$ wiTH $Q^2$ Is not ConsideREd BECauSe Of Its MoDEl DepenDenCe, and beCause of the MilD dEpendence of HerMeS $R_M$ data on $q^2$. As Discussed belOw, tHe propOsEd fUNctioNal Form oF $\tau$, Eq. , IS flexiBle enough To ENcompaSS both abSORpTion Models, which assume SHoRT production timEs and iN-mEDiUM HadRonIzation, and EnErgy lOSs modelS, WhICH AssUMe long lived quArks with ${\lanGLe t_P \ranglE} \gG R_A$, WHere $R_A$ Is the NuCLeaR radius. The 2 cLassEs of modelS are diSTinguisHEd by the Value oF thE scAlinG ExPoNenT: a POsiTIvE $\laMBda \Gneqq 0$ is cHaRaCteriStic OF ABSorpTioN modEls, whIle a negative $\lAmbDa \leSSsiM
0$ is chAractErisTiC of enErgy loSs modElS. Thus, the exponenT $\lamBda$ extracTed FrOm eXpErimeNTal datA caN idEntify tHe leadiNG meChANISm For hadron suppressiOn IN NDiS, and disTinguiSH sHoRT from lonG hAdrOnizATIon tiMe scALeS.

The scalIng of $R_m$ Is QuIte natuRaL in the CoNteXt oF hadrON absOrptioN models [@BIalas:1986CF; @Accardi:2002tv; @AccaRDi:2005jd; @KopelioviCH:2003pY; @fAlTEr:2004uc; @galLmeister:2005ad]. INdeeD, PrehAdroN AbSorPTion dEpendS oN ThE In-medium prehadron paTh Length, Which Depends on the pRehadron prODUCtion timE ${\lanGLe T_P \rangle}$, as long aS ${\langLe t_p \rangle}
\LEsssim R_A$. in the lund striNg model [@AnDERsson:1983ia] hAdrOniZatIon IS MoDeled by the breAKIng oF tHe color StrIng streTchIng FroM thE sTruck partOn to the tArGeT rEmNanT. The pROduction TiMe iS $$\bEgiN{aligNEd}
  {\langLe t_p \rAnglE} & = f(Z) (1-z) \FRac{Z E_q}{\kappA_\TeXT{Str}} 
 \lAbEl{Eq:luNdeSt}\End{alIgneD}$$ WheRe $E_q$ is tHe struck qUarK EnerGy, AnD $\kappa_\tExt{str}$ the striNg Tension. At lEaDinG order (lo) In the StrOng coupling constant $\alphA_S$, the parTonIc subProcEss is $\gammA^*+q {{\rIghtarRow}}Q$ And one ObtainS $$\begiN{aLigNED}
  E_q = \nu \.\END{
 or theoretical computatio ns. Obviou sly,the  pr op orti onal ity constant $ C $ ca nnot be determined bythe f it .  A p o ss iblescaling of $ R_M $wi th$Q ^ 2$  is n otconside red becaus e o fits model de p en dence, and  be cause of the  mi ld dep en den c e ofHER MES $ R_M$ d a ta on$Q^2$. As  d i scusse d  below, t he  pro posed functionalf or m  of $\tau$, Eq . , is  f l ex i b leeno ugh to enc om passb oth abs o rp t i o n m o dels, which a ssume short pro ductio ntim e s andin-me di u m h adronizatio n, a nd energy  lossm odels,w hich as sume l ong  li vedq ua rk s w it h  ${ \ la ngl e  t_ p \rangl e}  \ gg R_ A$,w h e r e $R _A$  isthe n uclear radius . T he 2 cla ssesof mo dels  a re di stingu ished  b y the value ofthescaling e xpo ne nt:  a  posi t ive $\ lam bda  \gneqq  0$ isc har ac t e r is tic of absorptionmo d e ls , whilea nega t iv e$ \lambda\l ess sim0 $  is c hara c te ristic o f ener g ylo ss mode ls . Thus ,the  ex ponen t  $\l ambda$  extract ed fr o m experimental data can iden t if y th e  lea din g mechanism  for hadr on s u pp res s ion i n nDI S, an d  distinguish shortfr om lon g had ronization ti me scales. T he scali ng o f  $ R _M$ is quite n atura l in the c o ntext of  hadr on absor ption mod e l s [@Bial as: 198 6cf ; @ A c ca rdi:2002tv; @ A c card i: 2005jd;  @K opeliov ich :20 03p y;@F alter:200 4uc; @Ga ll me is te r:2 005ad ] . Indeed ,pre ha dro n abs o rption  depe ndson  t h e i n-mediu m  p r e hadr on  p athlen gt h, wh ichd epe nds onthe preha dro n  pro du ct ion tim e ${\langle t _p  \rangle}$ ,aslong a s ${\langl e t_p \rangle}
\lesssim R_A$. I n t he Lu nd s tring mod el[@Ande rss o n:1983 ia] ha droni za tio n is mo d e le d b ythe breaki n g  of  theco lorstringstretching from th e  st ruck parton t o t he t a r ge t r e mn a nt.  T h e p r o duction time is  $$\begin{ al i gn ed}
  {\la n gle  t _p \ran gle} &= f(z )  (1-z)\frac{z E _q}{\kapp a_ \tex t { str }} 
 \labe l{eq:lun dest}\end { align e d} $$ wh ere  $E_q$  i s t he st ruck q u ark  ener gy, an d$\kapp a_\te xt {str}$ t he string tension. At l eading  orde r ( LO) in th e S t ron g couplin g co nstant $\a lph a_s $, th e p a rtoni c su b pr oce s s is$\ga m ma^*+q {{ \ ri ght a r ro w}}q$ and o n e obt ains$$\ b egin{a lign ed}
  E_q = \nu \ . \end{
 or_theoretical computations._Obviously, the proportionality constant_$C$ cannot_be_determined by_the_fit. A possible_scaling of $R_M$_with $Q^2$ is not_considered because of_its_model dependence, and because of the mild dependence of HERMES $R_M$ data on $Q^2$._As_discussed below,_the_proposed_functional form of $\tau$, Eq. ,_is flexible enough to encompass_both absorption_models, which assume short production times and in-medium_hadronization,_and energy loss_models, which assume long lived quarks with ${\langle t_p_\rangle} \gg R_A$, where $R_A$ is_the nuclear radius._The_2_classes of models are_distinguished by the value of the_scaling exponent: a positive $\lambda \gneqq_0$ is characteristic of absorption models, while_a negative $\lambda \lesssim
0$ is characteristic_of energy loss models. Thus,_the exponent_$\lambda$ extracted from experimental data_can identify the_leading mechanism_for hadron suppression_in nDIS, and distinguish short from_long hadronization time_scales.

The scaling of $R_M$ is quite_natural_in the context_of_hadron_absorption models_[@Bialas:1986cf; @Accardi:2002tv; @Accardi:2005jd;_@Kopeliovich:2003py;_@Falter:2004uc; @Gallmeister:2005ad]._Indeed,_prehadron absorption depends on the in-medium_prehadron_path length, which depends on the prehadron_production time ${\langle t_p_\rangle}$,_as long as ${\langle_t_p \rangle}
\lesssim R_A$. In the_Lund string model [@Andersson:1983ia] hadronization is_modeled by_the breaking_of the color string stretching from the struck parton to the_target remnant. The production time is_$$\begin{aligned}
  {\langle t_p_\rangle} &_=_f(z) (1-z) \frac{z_E_q}{\kappa_\text{str}}_
 \label{eq:lundest}\end{aligned}$$_where $E_q$ is the struck quark energy,_and $\kappa_\text{str}$_the string tension. At leading order_(LO) in the Strong_coupling_constant $\alpha_s$, the partonic subprocess is_$\gamma^*+q {{\rightarrow}}q$ and one obtains $$\begin{aligned}
_ E_q = \nu \.\end{