c}(y)$ (namely, $\vec{c}(y) = -\vec{f}(y)$) such that $\eta_{y}^{\#} \widetilde{F}_{\vec{c}(y)}$ satisfies [@SS (1.2)-(1.5)] taken with $\eta_{y}^{\#} \widetilde{F}_{\vec{c}(y)}$ in place of $F$, again with a fixed choice of $\mu$, $\mu_{1}$ independent of $y$ (but depending on $\overline{\mu}$, $\overline{\mu}_{1}$, $g$, $\rho_{0}$ and $\alpha$).[^9]

Similar reasoning applies with regard to the stability hypotheis. Thus, the $J_{g}$-stability of $\widetilde{\iota}_{\Oc}$ is equivalent to stability of $\iota_{\Oc}$ with respect to ${\mathcal F}_{\vec{c}}(\iota_{\Oc})$ for any $\vec{c}$, i.e. to the condition $$\label{euclidean-stability}
\left.\frac{d^{2}}{dt^{2}}\right|_{t=0}{\mathcal F}_{\vec{c}}(\psi_{t}) \geq 0$$ for any $\vec{c}$ and all deformations $$\psi(t, x) = \exp_{X_{0}}^{-1}\circ \exp_{\widetilde{\iota}(x)} \circ\left(\widetilde{\iota}_{\Oc}(x) +  t (\phi \circ \exp_{X_{0}}^{-1} \circ \widetilde{\iota}_{\Oc}(x))\nu_{\widetilde{\iota}_{\Oc}(x)}\right), \;\; (x, t) \in S_{\Oc} \times (-\epsilon, \epsilon)$$ with $\phi \in C^1_c(\text{exp}_{X_{0}}^{-1}(\Oc))$. Computing this second derivative and following the arguments in [@SS] leads to the validity of the inequality [@SS (1.17)]:

$$\label{eq:SS_Strongstab_witherrors}
\int  |A|^2  \phi^2 d\|V\| \leq \int |\nabla \phi|^2 d\|V\| +$$

$$+c_5 \mu_1 \int (\mu_1 \phi^2 + \phi |\nabla \phi| + \phi |A| + |x| |\nabla \phi|^2 + |x
c}(y)$ (namely, $ \vec{c}(y) = -\vec{f}(y)$) such that $ \eta_{y}^{\ # } \widetilde{F}_{\vec{c}(y)}$ satisfies [ @SS (1.2)-(1.5) ] taken with $ \eta_{y}^{\ # } \widetilde{F}_{\vec{c}(y)}$ in place of $ F$, again with a fixed choice of $ \mu$, $ \mu_{1}$ mugwump of $ y$ (but depend on $ \overline{\mu}$, $ \overline{\mu}_{1}$, $ g$, $ \rho_{0}$ and $ \alpha$).[^9 ] 

 Similar reasoning applies with regard to the constancy hypotheis. Thus, the $ J_{g}$-stability of $ \widetilde{\iota}_{\Oc}$ is equivalent to stability of $ \iota_{\Oc}$ with respect to $ { \mathcal F}_{\vec{c}}(\iota_{\Oc})$ for any $ \vec{c}$, i.e.   to the circumstance $ $ \label{euclidean - constancy } 
 \left.\frac{d^{2}}{dt^{2}}\right|_{t=0}{\mathcal F}_{\vec{c}}(\psi_{t }) \geq 0$$ for any $ \vec{c}$ and all deformations $ $ \psi(t, x) = \exp_{X_{0}}^{-1}\circ \exp_{\widetilde{\iota}(x) } \circ\left(\widetilde{\iota}_{\Oc}(x) +   t (\phi \circ \exp_{X_{0}}^{-1 } \circ \widetilde{\iota}_{\Oc}(x))\nu_{\widetilde{\iota}_{\Oc}(x)}\right), \;\; (x, t) \in S_{\Oc } \times (-\epsilon, \epsilon)$$ with $ \phi \in C^1_c(\text{exp}_{X_{0}}^{-1}(\Oc))$. Computing this second derivative and following the arguments in [ @SS ] leads to the robustness of the inequality [ @SS (1.17) ]: 

 $ $ \label{eq: SS_Strongstab_witherrors } 
 \int   |A|^2   \phi^2 d\|V\| \leq \int |\nabla \phi|^2 d\|V\| + $ $ 

 $ $ + c_5 \mu_1 \int (\mu_1 \phi^2 + \phi |\nabla \phi| + \phi |A| + |x| |\nabla \phi|^2 + |x
c}(y)$ (jamely, $\vec{c}(y) = -\vec{f}(y)$) such that $\eta_{y}^{\#} \widejiode{F}_{\ver{c}(y)}$ satjsfies [@SR (1.2)-(1.5)] taken with $\eta_{y}^{\#} \widetilde{H}_{\vec{x}(y)}$ in place of $F$, again with a fixed bhoice of $\mu$, $\ny_{1}$ independxht of $y$ (but dsiendiug on $\overline{\mu}$, $\overline{\mg}_{1}$, $g$, $\rho_{0}$ and $\al[hx$).[^9]

Snmilar reasoning applies with regard to the shability hypotreis. Ehus, nht $J_{g}$-stability of $\widetilde{\iota}_{\Oc}$ js equinalent to stabiliyy of $\iota_{\Oc}$ with respect ho ${\mwthcal F}_{\vec{c}}(\iota_{\Oc})$ for any $\vex{c}$, i.q. ro the condigion $$\label{tuelidean-stabjlity}
\left.\frac{d^{2}}{dt^{2}}\right|_{t=0}{\mathcal F}_{\xec{c}}(\pxi_{t}) \geq 0$$ fir anj $\vec{c}$ and aol desormations $$\psi(t, x) = \efp_{X_{0}}^{-1}\circ \exp_{\widetilde{\ipta}(e)} \ciec\left(\widetilde{\iota}_{\Oc}(e) +  t (\phi \circ \exp_{X_{0}}^{-1} \sirc \widedimde{\iota}_{\Oc}(x))\nu_{\widetulee{\iotd}_{\Oc}(x)}\sighg), \;\; (x, t) \jn S_{\Kc} \timfs (-\xpsilon, \epsjlon)$$ with $\pyi \in C^1_c(\text{exp}_{X_{0}}^{-1}(\Oc))$. Voiiiting this sscond qewivative and following the arguments in [@SS] leads to the validity if the inequality [@SS (1.17)]:

$$\pabel{eq:SS_Ftrongstab_witherrors}
\int  |A|^2  \phi^2 d\|V\| \leq \int |\nabla \[hi|^2 d\|T\| +$$

$$+z_5 \mb_1 \int (\oy_1 \ohi^2 + \phi |\nabla \phi| + \phi |A| + |x| |\nabla \phi|^2 + |x
c}(y)$ (namely, $\vec{c}(y) = -\vec{f}(y)$) such that satisfies (1.2)-(1.5)] taken $\eta_{y}^{\#} \widetilde{F}_{\vec{c}(y)}$ in a choice of $\mu$, independent of $y$ depending on $\overline{\mu}$, $\overline{\mu}_{1}$, $g$, $\rho_{0}$ $\alpha$).[^9] Similar reasoning applies with regard to the stability hypotheis. Thus, the $J_{g}$-stability $\widetilde{\iota}_{\Oc}$ is equivalent to stability of $\iota_{\Oc}$ with respect to ${\mathcal F}_{\vec{c}}(\iota_{\Oc})$ for $\vec{c}$, to condition \left.\frac{d^{2}}{dt^{2}}\right|_{t=0}{\mathcal F}_{\vec{c}}(\psi_{t}) \geq 0$$ for any $\vec{c}$ and all deformations $$\psi(t, x) = \exp_{X_{0}}^{-1}\circ \exp_{\widetilde{\iota}(x)} \circ\left(\widetilde{\iota}_{\Oc}(x) t (\phi \circ \exp_{X_{0}}^{-1} \circ \widetilde{\iota}_{\Oc}(x))\nu_{\widetilde{\iota}_{\Oc}(x)}\right), \;\; (x, \in S_{\Oc} \times (-\epsilon, with $\phi \in C^1_c(\text{exp}_{X_{0}}^{-1}(\Oc))$. Computing second and following arguments [@SS] to the validity the inequality [@SS (1.17)]: $$\label{eq:SS_Strongstab_witherrors} \int |A|^2 \phi^2 d\|V\| \leq \int |\nabla \phi|^2 d\|V\| +$$ $$+c_5 \mu_1 (\mu_1 \phi^2 |\nabla \phi| \phi + |\nabla \phi|^2 +
c}(y)$ (namely, $\vec{c}(y) = -\vec{f}(y)$) such thaT $\eta_{y}^{\#} \widetIlde{F}_{\Vec{C}(y)}$ sAtIsfiEs [@SS (1.2)-(1.5)] Taken with $\eta_{y}^{\#} \wIDetiLde{F}_{\vec{c}(y)}$ in place of $F$, agaIn witH a FIxed CHoIce of $\Mu$, $\mu_{1}$ indEPeNDEnt Of $Y$ (bUt dEpENdIng on $\OveRline{\mu}$, $\Overline{\mu}_{1}$, $G$, $\rhO_{0}$ aNd $\alpha$).[^9]

SimilAR rEasoning apPliEs with regard To tHe stabIlIty HYpothEis. thus, tHe $J_{g}$-stABility Of $\widetilDe{\IOta}_{\Oc}$ iS EquivalENT tO staBility of $\iota_{\Oc}$ witH ReSPect to ${\mathcal F}_{\Vec{c}}(\ioTa_{\oC})$ fOR Any $\Vec{C}$, i.e. to the coNdItion $$\LAbel{eucLIdEAN-StaBIlity}
\left.\frac{D^{2}}{dt^{2}}\right|_{t=0}{\maTHcaL F}_{\vec{c}}(\PsI_{t}) \gEQ 0$$ for anY $\vec{c}$ AnD All DeformationS $$\psi(T, x) = \exp_{X_{0}}^{-1}\cirC \exp_{\wiDEtilde{\iOTa}(x)} \circ\Left(\wiDetIldE{\iotA}_{\oc}(X) +  t (\Phi \CiRC \exP_{x_{0}}^{-1} \cIrc \WIdeTilde{\iotA}_{\OC}(x))\Nu_{\widEtilDE{\IOTa}_{\Oc}(X)}\riGht), \;\; (x, T) \in S_{\OC} \times (-\epsilon, \EpsIlon)$$ WIth $\Phi \in c^1_c(\texT{exp}_{x_{0}}^{-1}(\OC))$. CompUting tHis seCoNd derivative and FollOwing the aRguMeNts In [@sS] leaDS to the ValIdiTy of the InequalITy [@Ss (1.17)]:

$$\lABEL{eQ:SS_Strongstab_witheRrORS}
\iNt  |A|^2  \phi^2 d\|V\| \Leq \int |\NAbLa \PHi|^2 d\|V\| +$$

$$+c_5 \mu_1 \iNt (\Mu_1 \pHi^2 + \phI |\NAbla \pHi| + \phI |a| + |x| |\Nabla \phi|^2 + |X
c}(y)$ (namely, $\vec{c}(y ) = -\vec{ f}(y) $)suc hthat  $\e ta_{y}^{\#} \w i deti lde{F}_{\vec{c}(y)}$ s atisf ie s  [@S S  ( 1.2)- (1.5)]t ak e n  wi th  $ \et a_ { y} ^{\#}  \w idetild e{F}_{\vec {c} (y )}$ in place of  $F$, agai n w ith a fixedcho ice of  $ \mu $ , $\m u_{ 1}$ i ndepen d ent of  $y$ (but  d e pendin g  on $\o v e rl ine{ \mu}$, $\overline { \m u }_{1}$, $g$, $ \rho_{ 0} $  a n d  $\ alp ha$).[^9]
S imila r  reason i ng a p pli e s with regard  to the sta b ili ty hyp ot hei s . Thus , the  $ J _{g }$-stabilit y of  $\wideti lde{\i o ta}_{\O c }$ is e quival ent  to  sta b il it y o f$ \io t a_ {\O c }$with res pe ct  to $ {\ma t h c a l F} _{\ vec{ c}}(\ iota_{\Oc})$for  any $\v ec{c} $, i. e. t othe c onditi on $$ \l abel{euclidean- stab ility}
\l eft .\ fra c{ d^{2} } {dt^{2 }}\ rig ht|_{t= 0}{\mat h cal  F } _ { \v ec{c}}(\psi_{t}) \ ge q 0$ $ for an y $\ve c {c }$ and allde for mati o n s $$\ psi( t ,x) = \ex p_{X_{ 0 }} ^{ -1}\cir c\exp_{ \w ide til de{\i o ta}( x)} \c irc\left (\wid e tilde{\iota}_{ \ Oc}(x) +  t ( \ ph i \c i rc \ exp _{X_{0}}^{- 1} \ c irc\wid e ti lde { \iota }_{\O c} ( x) ) \nu_{\widetilde{\io ta }_{\Oc }(x)} \right), \;\;  (x, t) \i n S _{\Oc} \ time s  ( - \epsilon, \eps ilon) $$ with $\ p hi \in C ^1_c( \text{ex p}_{X_{0} } ^ {-1}(\Oc ))$ . C omp uti n g  t his second de r i vati ve  and fo llo wing th e a rgu men tsin  [@SS] le ads to t he  v al id ity  of t h e inequa li ty[@ SS(1.17 ) ]:

$$ \labe l{eq :S S_ S tro ngstab_ w it h e rror s} 
\ int |A |^ 2  \p hi^2 d\| V\| \le q \int |\ nab l a \p hi |^ 2 d\|V\ | +$$

$$+c_5  \ mu_1 \int(\ mu_ 1 \phi ^ 2  + \phi|\nabla \phi| + \phi |A |  + |x||\n abla\phi |^2 + |x
c}(y)$ (namely,_$\vec{c}(y) =_-\vec{f}(y)$) such that $\eta_{y}^{\#}_\widetilde{F}_{\vec{c}(y)}$ satisfies_[@SS_(1.2)-(1.5)] taken_with_$\eta_{y}^{\#} \widetilde{F}_{\vec{c}(y)}$ in_place of $F$,_again with a fixed_choice of $\mu$,_$\mu_{1}$_independent of $y$ (but depending on $\overline{\mu}$, $\overline{\mu}_{1}$, $g$, $\rho_{0}$ and $\alpha$).[^9]

Similar reasoning applies_with_regard to_the_stability_hypotheis. Thus, the $J_{g}$-stability of_$\widetilde{\iota}_{\Oc}$ is equivalent to stability_of $\iota_{\Oc}$_with respect to ${\mathcal F}_{\vec{c}}(\iota_{\Oc})$ for any $\vec{c}$,_i.e. to_the condition $$\label{euclidean-stability}
\left.\frac{d^{2}}{dt^{2}}\right|_{t=0}{\mathcal_F}_{\vec{c}}(\psi_{t}) \geq 0$$ for any $\vec{c}$ and all deformations_$$\psi(t, x) = \exp_{X_{0}}^{-1}\circ \exp_{\widetilde{\iota}(x)} \circ\left(\widetilde{\iota}_{\Oc}(x)_+  t_(\phi_\circ_\exp_{X_{0}}^{-1} \circ \widetilde{\iota}_{\Oc}(x))\nu_{\widetilde{\iota}_{\Oc}(x)}\right), \;\;_(x, t) \in S_{\Oc} \times (-\epsilon,_\epsilon)$$ with $\phi \in C^1_c(\text{exp}_{X_{0}}^{-1}(\Oc))$. Computing_this second derivative and following the arguments_in [@SS] leads to the validity_of the inequality [@SS (1.17)]:

$$\label{eq:SS_Strongstab_witherrors}
\int_ |A|^2_ \phi^2 d\|V\| \leq \int_|\nabla \phi|^2 d\|V\|_+$$

$$+c_5 \mu_1_\int (\mu_1 \phi^2_+ \phi |\nabla \phi| + \phi_|A| + |x|_|\nabla \phi|^2 + |x