 = 7 \pm 2$ M$_\odot$ and $E_K = (35 \pm 10) \times 10^{51}$ erg. Our errors on these physical quantities reflect conservatively the empirical nature of the method and its uncertainties (for instance, the fact that the phases at which the measured photospheric velocities are compared are never identical for the target and the template SN). The progenitor of SN 2013dx is thus probably $25-30 M_{\odot}$, which is $15- 20\%$ less massive than that estimated for SN 1998bw ($30-35 M_{\odot}$, Maeda et al. 2006)

Field of SN2013dx
-----------------

The field of SN 2013dx shows a bright galaxy southward of the transient, at $\sim 8"$ from the SN position (see Fig. 8). This could have been the SN host, since the faint source ($R=23.01$) at $0.6"$ from SN 2013dx was initially misclassified as a star in the SDSS (Singer et al. 2013). For this reason, Leloudas et al. (2013) obtained a spectrum of this galaxy, reporting a $z=0.145$, which is the same as that of the transient (Mulchaey et al. 2013a,b; D’Avanzo et al. 2013d). Kelly et al. (2013) performed an extensive study of this galaxy and its outskirt, concluding that the SN 2013dx host galaxy is a dwarf satellite of the bright one.

Many more galaxies are present in the SN 2013dx field. Kelly et al. 2013 noted that many of them have an SDSS photometric redshift compatible with that of the host and the bright galaxy. In addition, they also pointed out that the SDSS spctroscopic galaxy survey targeted five galaxies brighter than $17.7$ within 15’ from SN 2013dx, their redshift being close to $z=0.145$.

We decided to use different slit position angles during our VLT spectroscopic campaign. This allowed us to study both the spectroscopic evolution of the SN and to determine the redshift of more nearby galaxies. The different position angles adopted are described in Table 5, and the corresponding slit orientations are displayed in Fig. 8. This figure also marks with numbers the $14$ galaxies that we placed in the slit in our observations (“S” marks a star).

We determine the redshift of all these galaxies, although for three of them the determination is not completely
= 7 \pm 2 $ M$_\odot$ and $ E_K = (35 \pm 10) \times 10^{51}$ erg. Our errors on these physical quantities reflect conservatively the empiric nature of the method acting and its doubt (for instance, the fact that the phase at which the deliberate photospheric velocities are compared are never identical for the aim and the template SN). The progenitor of SN 2013dx is therefore probably $ 25 - 30 M_{\odot}$, which is $ 15- 20\%$ less massive than that estimated for SN 1998bw ($ 30 - 35 M_{\odot}$, Maeda et al. 2006) 

 Field of SN2013dx 
 ----------------- 

 The field of SN 2013dx shows a bright galax southward of the transient, at $ \sim 8"$ from the SN position (see Fig. 8). This could have been the SN host, since the dim source ($ R=23.01 $) at $ 0.6"$ from SN 2013dx was initially misclassified as a star in the SDSS (Singer et al. 2013). For this rationality, Leloudas et al. (2013) obtained a spectrum of this galaxy, report a $ z=0.145 $, which is the same as that of the transient (Mulchaey et al. 2013a, b; D’Avanzo et al. 2013d). Kelly et al. (2013) performed an extensive sketch of this galaxy and its outskirt, concluding that the SN 2013dx host galaxy is a gnome satellite of the bright one. 

 Many more galax are present in the SN 2013dx field. Kelly et al. 2013 noted that many of them have an SDSS photometric red shift compatible with that of the host and the bright galaxy. In addition, they also pointed out that the SDSS spctroscopic galaxy survey targeted five galaxies brighter than $ 17.7 $ within 15 ’ from SN 2013dx, their redshift being close to $ z=0.145$. 

 We decided to use different slit position angle during our VLT spectroscopic campaign. This allowed us to learn both the spectroscopic development of the SN and to settle the redshift of more nearby galaxies. The different position angles adopted are described in Table 5, and the correspond slit orientations are displayed in Fig. 8. This figure also marks with numbers the $ 14 $ galax that we placed in the slit in our observations (“ S ” marks a asterisk). 

 We determine the red shift of all these galaxy, although for three of them the determination is not completely
 = 7 \om 2$ M$_\odot$ and $E_K = (35 \pm 10) \tlmes 10^{51}$ erg. Our ertoes on vhese pgysical duantities reflect conservatmvelt the empirical nature of tfe method and its unctrtainties (for instance, tmz facf thac vhe phases at wmich the medsured photospvefie velocities are compared are never ydenticsl for the targej and ehe fvmklate SN). The progenitor of SN 2013dx js thus probably $25-30 M_{\ocot}$, which is $15- 20\%$ less massivf thwn that estimated vor SN 1998bw ($30-35 N_{\odoe}$, Maeda et al. 2006)

Field of SN2013dx
-----------------

The fiels of SN 2013dx shows a bright galaxh souchward of tye trwtsient, at $\smm 8"$ frjm the SN position (sae Fig. 8). This could haye bexn tye SN host, since the haint source ($R=23.01$) at $0.6"$ ftom SN 2013dx faa initially misclqswifieg as a sgqr kn uhe SSSS (Sijgec et al. 2013). Fod this reasin, Leloudas et al. (2013) pbeqined a spectdum of tris galaxy, reporting a $z=0.145$, which is the sdme as that of the transiebt (Mulchaey et al. 2013a,b; F’Avanzo ee al. 2013d). Kelly et al. (2013) performed an extensive study mf thms gaoawy ave lts outskirt, concluding that the SN 2013dx host gwmacy is a dwarf sabellite of the bribhh pge.

Many more gxlaxies ade present in the DN 2013dx fyeld. Jelly et wl. 2013 moted that many of them havw an SDSS phjrometric redshift eompatible wnth thst of the host and the brighc galasy. In additlon, they zuso pointed out ghan tha SDSS skztroscopic galaxy survey tergetzd five ealacies bwighter thwn $17.7$ wldhin 15’ from SN 2013dx, tjeir tedshixt being cpose to $z=0.145$.

We decided to use diffxcent slit posothon angles buring our VLT speceroscopic campcign. Thif alluwed us to study uoth the spestroscopic evmpution of thx SN and eo dwternine thd redshift of mpre nearbj yalaxies. Rhe different posibion xhgles adopted axt dtsxribed in Tablr 5, xnd tje cjsresponding vlit orkrntatkons art dlspuayec in Fig. 8. This figura alao marks with numbrrf the $14$ gqlaxies ehat we placec in the slit in okr obvertationx (“S” marks a star).

We determine the dedshift lf wll these gajaxics, ajthough fox three of them the determination is not completely
= 7 \pm 2$ M$_\odot$ and $E_K \pm \times 10^{51}$ Our errors on the nature of the and its uncertainties instance, the fact that the phases which the measured photospheric velocities are compared are never identical for the target the template SN). The progenitor of SN 2013dx is thus probably $25-30 M_{\odot}$, is 20\%$ massive that estimated for SN 1998bw ($30-35 M_{\odot}$, Maeda et al. 2006) Field of SN2013dx ----------------- The of SN 2013dx shows a bright galaxy southward the transient, at $\sim from the SN position (see 8). could have the host, the faint source at $0.6"$ from SN 2013dx was initially misclassified as a star in the SDSS (Singer et al. For this et al. obtained spectrum this galaxy, reporting which is the same as that (Mulchaey et al. 2013a,b; D’Avanzo et al. 2013d). et al. performed an extensive study of this and its outskirt, concluding that the SN 2013dx galaxy is a dwarf satellite of the bright one. Many more galaxies are present in 2013dx field. Kelly et 2013 noted that of have SDSS redshift compatible that of the host and the bright galaxy. In addition, they pointed out that the SDSS spctroscopic galaxy survey targeted five than within 15’ from 2013dx, their redshift being to We decided to use position during campaign. allowed to study both the evolution of the SN and determine the redshift of position angles adopted are described in Table 5, the corresponding slit orientations are displayed in 8. This figure also marks with numbers the $14$ galaxies that we in the our observations (“S” marks a star). We determine redshift of all these although for three of them the determination is not
 = 7 \pm 2$ M$_\odot$ and $E_K = (35 \pm 10) \times 10^{51}$ erg. Our Errors on thEse phYsiCal QuAntiTies Reflect conservATiveLy the empirical nature of The meThOD and ITs UncerTaintieS (FoR INstAnCe, The FaCT tHat thE phAses at wHich the meaSurEd Photospheric VElOcities are ComPared are neveR idEnticaL fOr tHE targEt aNd the TemplaTE SN). The ProgenitoR oF sN 2013dx is THus probABLy $25-30 m_{\odoT}$, which is $15- 20\%$ less massiVE tHAn that estimateD for SN 1998Bw ($30-35 m_{\OdOT}$, maeDa eT al. 2006)

Field of sN2013Dx
-----------------

The FIeld of Sn 2013Dx SHOWs a BRight galaxy soUthward of thE TraNsient, At $\Sim 8"$ FRom the sN posItIOn (sEe Fig. 8). This coUld hAve been thE SN hosT, Since thE Faint soUrce ($R=23.01$) aT $0.6"$ frOm Sn 2013dx wAS iNiTiaLlY MisCLaSsiFIed As a star iN tHe sDSS (SIngeR ET AL. 2013). For ThiS reaSon, LeLoudas et al. (2013) obtAinEd a sPEctRum of This gAlaxY, rEportIng a $z=0.145$, wHich iS tHe same as that of tHe trAnsient (MuLchAeY et Al. 2013A,b; D’AvANzo et aL. 2013d). KEllY et al. (2013) peRformed AN exTeNSIVe Study of this galaxy aNd ITS oUtskirt, cOncludINg ThAT the SN 2013dx HoSt gAlaxY IS a dwaRf saTElLite of thE brighT OnE.

MAny more GaLaxies ArE prEseNt in tHE SN 2013dX field. kelly et aL. 2013 noteD That many of them HAve an SDSS photOMeTRIc REdshIft Compatible wIth tHAt of The hOSt And THe briGht gaLaXY. IN Addition, they also poiNtEd out tHat thE SDSS spctroscOpic galaxy SURVey targeTed fIVe GAlaxies brighteR than $17.7$ Within 15’ from sn 2013dx, their RedshIft being Close to $z=0.145$.

WE DEcided to Use DifFerEnt SLIt Position angleS DUrinG oUr VLT spEctRoscopiC caMpaIgn. thiS aLlowed us tO study boTh ThE sPeCtrOscopIC evolutiOn Of tHe sN aNd to dETerminE the rEdshIfT oF MorE nearby GAlAXIes. THe DiFferEnt PoSitioN angLEs aDopted aRe describEd iN tablE 5, aNd The corrEsponding slit OrIentations ArE diSplayeD IN Fig. 8. This Figure also marks with numbERs the $14$ gaLaxIes thAt we Placed in tHe sLit in oUr oBServatIons (“S” mArks a StAr).

WE DEtermINE tHe rEdShift of all THEse GalaxIeS, altHough foR three of them the detERmiNation is not coMplEtelY
 = 7 \pm 2$ M$_\odot$ and$E_K = (35  \pm10)  \t im es 1 0^{5 1}$ erg. Our e r rors  on these physical qua ntiti es refl e ct  cons ervativ e ly t heem pi ric al na tureofthe met hod and it s u nc ertainties ( f or  instance,  th e fact thatthe  phase satw hichthe  meas ured p h otosph eric velo ci t ies ar e  compar e d  a re n ever identical fo r  t h e target and t he tem pl a te S N).  Th e progenit or  of S N  2013dx is t h usp robably $25-3 0 M_{\odot} $ , w hich i s$15 -  20\%$  less  m a ssi ve than tha t es timated f or SN1 998bw ( $ 30-35 M _{\odo t}$ , M aeda et  a l.20 0 6)Fi eld ofSN2013dx 
- -- ----- ---- - - - - -

T hefiel d ofSN 2013dx sho wsa br i ght  gala xy so uthw ar d ofthe tr ansie nt , at $\sim 8"$from  the SN p osi ti on(s ee Fi g . 8).Thi s c ould ha ve been the  S N h os t, since the faint  s o u rc e ($R=23 .01$)a t$0 . 6"$ from  S N 2 013d x was i niti a ll y miscla ssifie d  a sa starin  the S DS S ( Sin ger e t  al.  2013) . For th is re a son, Leloudase t al. (2013)o bt a i ne d  a s pec trum of thi s ga l axy,  rep o rt ing a $z= 0.145 $, wh i ch is the same as t ha t of t he tr ansient (Mulc haey et al . 2 013a,b;D’Av a nz o  et al. 2013d) . Kel ly et al.( 2013) pe rform ed an ex tensive s t u dy of th isgal axy  an d it s outskirt, c o n clud in g thatthe  SN 201 3dx  ho stgal ax y is a dw arf sate ll it eof  th e bri g ht one.
M any  m ore  gala x ies ar e pre sent  i nt heSN 2013 d xf i eld.  K el ly e t a l.  2013  not e d t hat man y of them  ha v e an  S DS S photo metric redshi ft  compatibl ewit h that o f the ho st and the bright galax y . In ad dit ion,they  also poi nte d outtha t  the S DSS sp ctros co pic g alaxy s ur vey  t argeted fi v e  ga laxie sbrig hter th an $17.7$ within 1 5 ’ f rom SN 2013dx , t heir r ed shi f tb ein gc los e to $z=0.145$.
We decided  t o  u se differe n t s li t posit ion ang les d u ring ou r VLT spe ctroscopi ccamp a i gn.  This allo wed us t o study b o th th e  s pectr osc opic e vo lut ion o f theS N a nd to  deter mi ne the  reds hi ft of mo re nearby galaxies. The  diffe rentpos ition ang les ado pted aredesc ribed in T abl e 5 , and  th e  corr espo n di ngs lit o rien t ations ar e  d isp l a ye d in Fig. 8 . T his  figu rea lso ma rkswith numbers the$ 14$ galaxies t hatw e  pl ace d  inth e slit in ourobs er v a tions (“ S”  marks a st ar).

We  d e termi ne the  redsh ift ofa l lt hese g alax ies , althoug h f or three o fth e m thedete rm inatio n is n o t co m p letely
 =_7 \pm_2$ M$_\odot$ and $E_K_= (35_\pm_10) \times_10^{51}$_erg. Our errors_on these physical_quantities reflect conservatively the_empirical nature of_the_method and its uncertainties (for instance, the fact that the phases at which the_measured_photospheric velocities_are_compared_are never identical for the_target and the template SN)._The progenitor_of SN 2013dx is thus probably $25-30 M_{\odot}$,_which_is $15- 20\%$_less massive than that estimated for SN 1998bw ($30-35_M_{\odot}$, Maeda et al. 2006)

Field of_SN2013dx
-----------------

The field of_SN_2013dx_shows a bright galaxy_southward of the transient, at $\sim_8"$ from the SN position (see_Fig. 8). This could have been the_SN host, since the faint source_($R=23.01$) at $0.6"$ from SN_2013dx was_initially misclassified as a star_in the SDSS_(Singer et_al. 2013). For_this reason, Leloudas et al. (2013)_obtained a spectrum_of this galaxy, reporting a $z=0.145$,_which_is the same_as_that_of the_transient (Mulchaey et_al._2013a,b; D’Avanzo_et_al. 2013d). Kelly et al. (2013)_performed_an extensive study of this galaxy and_its outskirt, concluding that_the_SN 2013dx host galaxy_is a dwarf satellite of_the bright one.

Many more galaxies are_present in_the SN_2013dx field. Kelly et al. 2013 noted that many of them_have an SDSS photometric redshift compatible_with that of the_host and_the_bright galaxy. In_addition,_they also_pointed out that the SDSS spctroscopic galaxy_survey targeted_five galaxies brighter than $17.7$ within_15’ from SN 2013dx,_their_redshift being close to $z=0.145$.

We decided_to use different slit position angles_during our VLT spectroscopic campaign._This_allowed_us to study both the_spectroscopic evolution of the SN and_to determine the_redshift of more nearby galaxies. The different_position_angles adopted are described in Table_5,_and the corresponding slit orientations are_displayed_in_Fig. 8. This figure also_marks with numbers the $14$ galaxies_that we placed in the slit in our observations_(“S” marks a_star).

We determine the redshift of_all_these_galaxies, although for three of them the determination is not_completely