}})$. Let $L: R^k\rightarrow R^k$ be defined by $$L_j({\mbox{\bf w}})=m^{-1}\sum_{i=1}^m b_{ij}sgn(K_i-{\mbox{\bf b}}_i^T{\mbox{\bf w}})$$ where $sgn(x)$ is the sign function of $x$ and equals zero when $x=0$. Then we want to prove that there is a root ${\widehat {\mbox{\bf w}}}$ of the equation $L({\mbox{\bf w}})=0$ satisfying $\|{\widehat {\mbox{\bf w}}}\|_2^2=O_p(k/m)$. By classical convexity argument, it suffices to show that with high probability, ${\mbox{\bf w}}^TL({\mbox{\bf w}})<0$ with $\|{\mbox{\bf w}}\|_2^2=Bk/m$ for a sufficiently large constant $B$.

Let $V={\mbox{\bf w}}^TL({\mbox{\bf w}})=m^{-1}\sum_{i=1}^mV_i$, where $V_i=({\mbox{\bf b}}_i^T{\mbox{\bf w}})sgn(K_i-{\mbox{\bf b}}_i^T{\mbox{\bf w}})$. By Chebyshev’s inequality, $P(V<E(V)+h\times {\mbox{SD}}(V))>1-h^{-2}$. Therefore, to prove the result in Theorem 3, we want to derive the upper bounds for $E(V)$ and ${\mbox{SD}}(V)$ and show that $\forall h>0$, $\exists B$ and $M$ s.t. $\forall m>M$, $P(V<0)>1-h^{-2}$.

We will first present a result from Polya (1945), which will be very useful for our proof. For $x>0$, $$\label{a70}
\Phi(x)=\frac{1}{2}\Big[1+\sqrt{1-\exp(-\frac{2}{\pi}x^2)}\Big](1+\delta(x)) \ \ \ \text{with} \ \ \sup_{x>0}|\delta(x)|<0.004.$$ The variance of $V$ is shown as follows: $${\mbox{Var}}(V)=m^{-2}\sum_{i=1}^m{\
} }) $. Let $ L: R^k\rightarrow R^k$ be defined by $ $ L_j({\mbox{\bf w}})=m^{-1}\sum_{i=1}^m b_{ij}sgn(K_i-{\mbox{\bf b}}_i^T{\mbox{\bf w}})$$ where $ sgn(x)$ is the sign affair of $ x$ and equal zero when $ x=0$. Then we want to prove that there is a solution $ { \widehat { \mbox{\bf w}}}$ of the equation $ L({\mbox{\bf w}})=0 $ satisfying $ \|{\widehat { \mbox{\bf w}}}\|_2 ^ 2 = O_p(k / m)$. By authoritative convexity argument, it suffices to prove that with high probability, $ { \mbox{\bf w}}^TL({\mbox{\bf w}})<0 $ with $ \|{\mbox{\bf w}}\|_2 ^ 2 = Bk / m$ for a sufficiently large ceaseless $ B$. 

 Let $ V={\mbox{\bf w}}^TL({\mbox{\bf w}})=m^{-1}\sum_{i=1}^mV_i$, where $ V_i=({\mbox{\bf b}}_i^T{\mbox{\bf w}})sgn(K_i-{\mbox{\bf b}}_i^T{\mbox{\bf w}})$. By Chebyshev ’s inequality, $ P(V < E(V)+h\times { \mbox{SD}}(V))>1 - h^{-2}$. Therefore, to prove the solution in Theorem 3, we desire to derive the upper bounds for $ E(V)$ and $ { \mbox{SD}}(V)$ and picture that $ \forall h>0 $, $ \exists B$ and $ M$ s.t. $ \forall m > M$, $ P(V<0)>1 - h^{-2}$. 

 We will first present a consequence from Polya (1945), which will be very useful for our proof. For $ x>0 $, $ $ \label{a70 } 
 \Phi(x)=\frac{1}{2}\Big[1+\sqrt{1-\exp(-\frac{2}{\pi}x^2)}\Big](1+\delta(x) ) \ \ \ \text{with } \ \ \sup_{x>0}|\delta(x)|<0.004.$$ The variance of $ V$ is show as follows: $ $ { \mbox{Var}}(V)=m^{-2}\sum_{i=1}^m{\
}})$. Leh $L: R^k\rightarrow R^k$ be dtfined by $$L_j({\mbox{\by w}})=m^{-1}\sum_{m=1}^m b_{ij}sfn(K_i-{\mbox{\cf b}}_i^T{\mbox{\bf w}})$$ where $sgn(x)$ is tye sitn function of $x$ and eduals zerl when $x=0$. Thei we want to prots that bkere jd a xoit ${\widehat {\mbow{\bf w}}}$ of tha equation $L({\mbmx{\cf w}})=0$ satisfying $\|{\widehat {\mbox{\bf w}}}\|_2^2=O_p(k/m)$. Fy clasxifal convexity wrgukqnt, jn wuffices to show that with hifh probebility, ${\mbox{\bf e}}^TL({\mbox{\bf w}})<0$ with $\|{\mbox{\bf w}}\|_2^2=Bn/m$ flr a sufficiently parge constqnt $F$.

Oet $V={\mbox{\bf d}}^TL({\mbox{\bf w}})=m^{-1}\sum_{i=1}^mV_i$, whgre $V_i=({\mbox{\bf b}}_i^T{\mbox{\bf w}})sgn(K_i-{\mbob{\bf b}}_n^T{\mbox{\bf w}})$. Vy Chftyshev’s inewualiny, $P(V<E(V)+h\times {\mbox{SD}}(V))>1-v^{-2}$. Theregore, to prove bhe rxsulr in Theorem 3, we want to derive the uppgr bounds xox $E(V)$ and ${\mbox{SD}}(V)$ and whiw thdt $\fmralu h>0$, $\dxiatx G$ and $L$ s.v. $\forall m>M$, $P(V<0)>1-h^{-2}$.

We will first present a rexujn from Polya (1945), which wyll be very useful for our proof. For $x>0$, $$\nabsl{a70}
\Phi(x)=\frac{1}{2}\Big[1+\sqrt{1-\exp(-\frqc{2}{\pi}x^2)}\Big](1+\delta(x)) \ \ \ \texj{with} \ \ \su[_{x>0}|\delta(x)|<0.004.$$ The variance of $V$ is shown as follows: $${\mbmx{Var}}(T)=m^{-2}\rum_{n=1}^n{\
}})$. Let $L: R^k\rightarrow R^k$ be defined w}})=m^{-1}\sum_{i=1}^m b}}_i^T{\mbox{\bf w}})$$ $sgn(x)$ is the equals when $x=0$. Then want to prove there is a root ${\widehat {\mbox{\bf of the equation $L({\mbox{\bf w}})=0$ satisfying $\|{\widehat {\mbox{\bf w}}}\|_2^2=O_p(k/m)$. By classical convexity argument, suffices to show that with high probability, ${\mbox{\bf w}}^TL({\mbox{\bf w}})<0$ with $\|{\mbox{\bf w}}\|_2^2=Bk/m$ a large $B$. $V={\mbox{\bf w}}^TL({\mbox{\bf w}})=m^{-1}\sum_{i=1}^mV_i$, where $V_i=({\mbox{\bf b}}_i^T{\mbox{\bf w}})sgn(K_i-{\mbox{\bf b}}_i^T{\mbox{\bf w}})$. By Chebyshev’s inequality, $P(V<E(V)+h\times {\mbox{SD}}(V))>1-h^{-2}$. Therefore, to the result in Theorem 3, we want to the upper bounds for and ${\mbox{SD}}(V)$ and show that h>0$, B$ and s.t. m>M$, We will first a result from Polya (1945), which will be very useful for our proof. For $x>0$, $$\label{a70} \Phi(x)=\frac{1}{2}\Big[1+\sqrt{1-\exp(-\frac{2}{\pi}x^2)}\Big](1+\delta(x)) \ \ \ \sup_{x>0}|\delta(x)|<0.004.$$ variance $V$ shown as follows:
}})$. Let $L: R^k\rightarrow R^k$ be definEd by $$L_j({\mbox{\Bf w}})=m^{-1}\sUm_{i=1}^M b_{iJ}sGn(K_i-{\Mbox{\Bf b}}_i^T{\mbox{\bf w}})$$ whERe $sgN(x)$ is the sign function of $x$ And eqUaLS zerO WhEn $x=0$. ThEn we wanT To PROve ThAt TheRe IS a Root ${\wIdeHat {\mbox{\Bf w}}}$ of the eqUatIoN $L({\mbox{\bf w}})=0$ satISfYing $\|{\widehaT {\mbOx{\bf w}}}\|_2^2=O_p(k/m)$. By cLasSical cOnVexITy argUmeNt, it sUfficeS To show That with hIgH ProbabILity, ${\mboX{\BF w}}^tL({\mbOx{\bf w}})<0$ with $\|{\mbox{\bf w}}\|_2^2=BK/M$ fOR a sufficiently Large cOnSTaNT $b$.

LeT $V={\mBox{\bf w}}^TL({\mbOx{\Bf w}})=m^{-1}\sUM_{i=1}^mV_i$, whERe $v_I=({\MBox{\BF b}}_i^T{\mbox{\bf w}})sgN(K_i-{\mbox{\bf b}}_i^t{\MboX{\bf w}})$. By chEbySHev’s inEqualItY, $p(V<E(v)+h\times {\mbox{sD}}(V))>1-h^{-2}$. therefore, To provE The resuLT in TheoRem 3, we wAnt To dErivE ThE uPpeR bOUndS FoR $E(V)$ ANd ${\mBox{SD}}(V)$ anD sHoW that $\ForaLL H>0$, $\EXistS B$ aNd $M$ s.T. $\foraLl m>M$, $P(V<0)>1-h^{-2}$.

We will FirSt prESenT a resUlt frOm PoLyA (1945), whicH will bE very UsEful for our proof. for $x>0$, $$\Label{a70}
\Phi(X)=\frAc{1}{2}\big[1+\SqRt{1-\exp(-\FRac{2}{\pi}x^2)}\big](1+\DelTa(x)) \ \ \ \text{With} \ \ \sup_{X>0}|\DelTa(X)|<0.004.$$ tHE vAriance of $V$ is shown aS fOLLoWs: $${\mbox{VaR}}(V)=m^{-2}\sum_{I=1}^M{\
}})$. Let $L: R^k\rightarr ow R^k$ be  defi ned  by  $ $L_j ({\m box{\bf w}})=m ^ {-1} \sum_{i=1}^m b_{ij}sgn (K_i- {\ m box{ \ bf  b}}_ i^T{\mb o x{ \ b f w }} )$ $ w he r e$sgn( x)$  is the  sign func tio nof $x$ and e q ua ls zero wh en$x=0$. Thenwewant t opro v e tha t t hereis a r o ot ${\ widehat { \m b ox{\bf w}}}$ o f th e eq uation $L({\mbox{ \ bf w}})=0$ satisf ying $ \| { \w i d eha t { \mbox{\bfw} }}\|_ 2 ^2=O_p( k /m ) $ .  By classical con vexity argu m ent , it s uf fic e s to s how t ha t  wi th high pro babi lity, ${\ mbox{\ b f w}}^T L ({\mbox {\bf w }}) <0$  wit h  $ \| {\m bo x {\b f  w }}\ | _2^ 2=Bk/m$fo ra suf fici e n t l y la rge  con stant  $B$.

Let $V ={\ mbox { \bf  w}}^ TL({\ mbox {\ bf w} })=m^{ -1}\s um _{i=1}^mV_i$, w here  $V_i=({\ mbo x{ \bf  b }}_i^ T {\mbox {\b f w }})sgn( K_i-{\m b ox{ \b f b }} _i^T{\mbox{\bf w}} )$ . By  Chebysh ev’s i n eq ua l ity, $P( V< E(V )+h\ t i mes { \mbo x {S D}}(V))> 1-h^{- 2 }$ .Therefo re , to p ro vethe  resu l t in  Theor em 3, we  want to derive theu pper bounds f o r$ E (V ) $ an d $ {\mbox{SD}} (V)$ andshow th at$ \fora ll h> 0$ ,  $ \ exists B$ and $M$ s .t . $\fo rallm>M$, $P(V<0) >1-h^{-2}$ . We willfirs t  p r esent a result  from  Polya (19 4 5), whic h wil l be ver y usefulf o r our pr oof . F or$x> 0 $ ,$$\label{a70} \ Phi( x) =\frac{ 1}{ 2}\Big[ 1+\ sqr t{1 -\e xp (-\frac{2 }{\pi}x^ 2) }\ Bi g] (1+ \delt a (x)) \ \  \  \t ex t{w ith}\  \ \su p_{x> 0}|\ de lt a (x) |<0.004 . $$ T he v ar ia nceof$V $ isshow n  as  follow s: $${\mb ox{ V ar}} (V )= m^{-2}\ sum_{i=1}^m{\ 
}})$. Let_$L: R^k\rightarrow_R^k$ be defined by_$$L_j({\mbox{\bf w}})=m^{-1}\sum_{i=1}^m_b_{ij}sgn(K_i-{\mbox{\bf_b}}_i^T{\mbox{\bf w}})$$_where_$sgn(x)$ is the_sign function of_$x$ and equals zero_when $x=0$. Then_we_want to prove that there is a root ${\widehat {\mbox{\bf w}}}$ of the equation_$L({\mbox{\bf_w}})=0$ satisfying_$\|{\widehat_{\mbox{\bf_w}}}\|_2^2=O_p(k/m)$. By classical convexity argument,_it suffices to show that_with high_probability, ${\mbox{\bf w}}^TL({\mbox{\bf w}})<0$ with $\|{\mbox{\bf w}}\|_2^2=Bk/m$ for_a_sufficiently large constant_$B$.

Let $V={\mbox{\bf w}}^TL({\mbox{\bf w}})=m^{-1}\sum_{i=1}^mV_i$, where $V_i=({\mbox{\bf b}}_i^T{\mbox{\bf w}})sgn(K_i-{\mbox{\bf b}}_i^T{\mbox{\bf_w}})$. By Chebyshev’s inequality, $P(V<E(V)+h\times {\mbox{SD}}(V))>1-h^{-2}$._Therefore, to prove_the_result_in Theorem 3, we_want to derive the upper bounds_for $E(V)$ and ${\mbox{SD}}(V)$ and show_that $\forall h>0$, $\exists B$ and $M$_s.t. $\forall m>M$, $P(V<0)>1-h^{-2}$.

We will first_present a result from Polya_(1945), which_will be very useful for_our proof. For_$x>0$, $$\label{a70}
\Phi(x)=\frac{1}{2}\Big[1+\sqrt{1-\exp(-\frac{2}{\pi}x^2)}\Big](1+\delta(x))_\ \ \_\text{with} \ \ \sup_{x>0}|\delta(x)|<0.004.$$ The variance_of $V$ is_shown as follows: $${\mbox{Var}}(V)=m^{-2}\sum_{i=1}^m{\