mathbf{n}\times \mathbf{I},\ \xi\in\mathbb{R}$ [@HarringtonMautz; @ColtonKress], and thus those operators $\mathcal{R}$ are not regularizing operators for $\mathcal{T}_k$. If $\mathcal{R}$ is chosen as a right regularizing operator for $\mathcal{T}_k$, the integral operator on the left hand side of (\[eq:CFIE\_R\]) is a second kind Fredholm operator, and, thus, the unique solvability of equation (\[eq:CFIE\_R\]) is equivalent to the injectivity of the left-hand-side operator. Operators $\mathcal{R}$ with the aforementioned property have been proposed and analyzed in the literature [@turc1]. The aim of this paper is to present a general strategy to produce and analyze novel regularizing operators $\mathcal{R}$ and to analyze previously introduced regularizing operators for which an analysis does not exist in the literature.

The starting point of constructing suitable regularizing operators $\mathcal{R}$ is the Calderón’s identity $\mathcal{T}_k^2=\frac{I}{4}-\mathcal{K}_k^2$ [@HsiaoKleinman]. The regularizing operators $\mathcal{R}$ should thus resemble the electric field operator $\mathcal{T}_k$. If the choice $\mathcal{R}=\mathcal{T}_k$ were made, the ensuing CFIER operators would not be injective since for certain wavenumbers $k$ the operators $\frac{I}{2}-\mathcal{K}_k$ are not injective [@ColtonKress; @HsiaoKleinman]. In order to ensure the injectivity of the resulting CFIER operators, one strategy is to modify the wavenumber in the definition of the regularizing operator $\mathcal{R}=\mathcal{T}_k$. Specifically, we propose a general regularizing operator $\mathcal{R}$ of the form $$\label{eq:defR}
\mathcal{R} = \eta\ \mathbf{n}\times \mathbf{S}_K +\zeta\ \mathcal{T}^1_K\ {\rm div}_\Gamma$$ where $\eta$ and $\zeta$ are complex numbers and $K$ is a complex wavenumber such that $\Im K>0$. Given the starting point, we refer to the CFIER operators thus constructed as Calderón CFIER. We
mathbf{n}\times \mathbf{I},\ \xi\in\mathbb{R}$   [ @HarringtonMautz; @ColtonKress ], and thus those operators $ \mathcal{R}$ are not regularizing operators for $ \mathcal{T}_k$. If $ \mathcal{R}$ is choose as a proper regularizing operator for $ \mathcal{T}_k$, the integral operator on the leftover hand side of (\[eq: CFIE\_R\ ]) is a second kind Fredholm operator, and, therefore, the singular solvability of equation (\[eq: CFIE\_R\ ]) is equivalent to the injectivity of the leftover - bridge player - side hustler. Operators $ \mathcal{R}$ with the aforementioned property have been proposed and analyze in the literature   [ @turc1 ]. The aim of this paper is to present a general strategy to grow and analyze novel regularizing operators $ \mathcal{R}$ and to analyze previously introduced regularize operators for which an analysis does not exist in the literature. 

 The starting point of construct suitable regularizing operators $ \mathcal{R}$ is the Calderón ’s identity $ \mathcal{T}_k^2=\frac{I}{4}-\mathcal{K}_k^2 $   [ @HsiaoKleinman ]. The regularizing operators $ \mathcal{R}$ should thus resemble the electric discipline operator $ \mathcal{T}_k$. If the choice $ \mathcal{R}=\mathcal{T}_k$ were made, the ensuing CFIER operators would not be injective since for sealed wavenumbers $ k$ the operator $ \frac{I}{2}-\mathcal{K}_k$ are not injective   [ @ColtonKress; @HsiaoKleinman ]. In order to ensure the injectivity of the resulting CFIER operators, one strategy is to modify the wavenumber in the definition of the regularizing operator $ \mathcal{R}=\mathcal{T}_k$. Specifically, we propose a general regularizing hustler $ \mathcal{R}$ of the kind $ $ \label{eq: defR } 
 \mathcal{R } = \eta\ \mathbf{n}\times \mathbf{S}_K + \zeta\ \mathcal{T}^1_K\ { \rm div}_\Gamma$$ where $ \eta$ and $ \zeta$ are complex numbers and $ K$ is a complex wavenumber such that $ \Im K>0$. feed the start item, we refer to the CFIER operators thus constructed as Calderón CFIER. We
matjbf{n}\times \mathbf{I},\ \xi\in\mauhbb{R}$ [@HarringtonMaotz; @ColtmnKresa], and thjs those operators $\mathcal{R}$ ere bot rtyularizing operators for $\mathbal{T}_k$. If $\nathral{R}$ is chosen as a righb reghpariviig operator for $\mathcal{T}_k$, the integral mpdrctor on the left hand side of (\[eq:CFIE\_W\]) is a xefond kind Fredrolm jperznov, and, thus, the unique solvabilitg of eqlation (\[eq:CFIE\_R\]) is equivalent to the injectigity of the left-hand-sife operator. Opewqtors $\mathcau{R}$ with tht cforementiohed property have been proposed and cnalyzed in tye phterature [@tucc1]. The aim of this paper iv to prrsent a generak svratwgy to produce and anelyze novel regularieing operadoxs $\mathcal{R}$ and to anqltze pteviogsly untfodhcxd degulagizmng operatods for whicy an analysis does moe exist in the literwttre.

The starting point of constructing slitagle regularizing operatirs $\mathcal{R}$ is the Cwlderón’s iqentity $\mathcal{T}_k^2=\frac{I}{4}-\mathcal{K}_k^2$ [@HsiaoKleinman]. The segulerkziun upegators $\mathcal{R}$ should thus resemble the elecediv nield operator $\mcthcal{T}_k$. If the vhlivg $\mathcal{R}=\mathzal{T}_k$ csrs made, the ensuing CFIER jperarors woulq noy be injective since for ceetain wavenuivers $k$ the operatoxs $\frac{I}{2}-\matheal{K}_k$ sre npt injective [@ColtonKress; @HsizoKleinman]. Ln order fu ensure the injdctpvitf of the resulting CFIER o[erators, ine xtrategh is to moqify the wwvenumber in the definitlon oy the regularizlng operator $\mathcal{R}=\mathcal{T}_k$. Specifically, wg psopmse a geueral vegularizing opqrator $\mathcal{T}$ of the yorm $$\lxbel{eq:defR}
\jathcal{C} = \eta\ \mathbs{n}\times \mathbx{D}_K +\zeta\ \mathral{T}^1_K\ {\rm qiv}_\Gqmma$$ where $\dga$ and $\zeta$ arr complex numbers abd $K$ is a complex xavevhmber such that $\Im K>0$. Given the stsrtkng pliit, we sefer to the CFIDR uleraturs thus cokstfuctrd as Calderón CFIER. Fe
mathbf{n}\times \mathbf{I},\ \xi\in\mathbb{R}$ [@HarringtonMautz; @ColtonKress], and thus $\mathcal{R}$ not regularizing for $\mathcal{T}_k$. If right operator for $\mathcal{T}_k$, integral operator on left hand side of (\[eq:CFIE\_R\]) is second kind Fredholm operator, and, thus, the unique solvability of equation (\[eq:CFIE\_R\]) is to the injectivity of the left-hand-side operator. Operators $\mathcal{R}$ with the aforementioned property been and in literature [@turc1]. The aim of this paper is to present a general strategy to produce and novel regularizing operators $\mathcal{R}$ and to analyze previously regularizing operators for which analysis does not exist in literature. starting point constructing regularizing $\mathcal{R}$ is the identity $\mathcal{T}_k^2=\frac{I}{4}-\mathcal{K}_k^2$ [@HsiaoKleinman]. The regularizing operators $\mathcal{R}$ should thus resemble the electric field operator $\mathcal{T}_k$. If the $\mathcal{R}=\mathcal{T}_k$ were ensuing CFIER would be since for certain the operators $\frac{I}{2}-\mathcal{K}_k$ are not injective order to ensure the injectivity of the resulting operators, one is to modify the wavenumber in definition of the regularizing operator $\mathcal{R}=\mathcal{T}_k$. Specifically, we a general regularizing operator $\mathcal{R}$ of the form $$\label{eq:defR} \mathcal{R} = \eta\ \mathbf{n}\times \mathbf{S}_K +\zeta\ div}_\Gamma$$ where $\eta$ and are complex numbers $K$ a wavenumber that $\Im Given the starting point, we refer to the CFIER operators thus as Calderón CFIER. We
mathbf{n}\times \mathbf{I},\ \xi\in\maThbb{R}$ [@HarriNgtonmauTz; @COlTonKRess], And thus those opERatoRs $\mathcal{R}$ are not regulaRizinG oPEratORs For $\maThcal{T}_k$. iF $\mATHcaL{R}$ Is ChoSeN As A righT reGularizIng operatoR foR $\mAthcal{T}_k$, the iNTeGral operatOr oN the left hand SidE of (\[eq:CfIe\_R\]) iS A secoNd kInd FrEdholm OPeratoR, and, thus, tHe UNique sOLvabiliTY Of EquaTion (\[eq:CFIE\_R\]) is equiVAlENt to the injectiVity of ThE LeFT-HanD-siDe operator. opEratoRS $\mathcaL{r}$ wITH The AForementioned Property havE BeeN propoSeD anD AnalyzEd in tHe LIteRature [@turc1]. THe aiM of this paPer is tO Present A General StrateGy tO prOducE AnD aNalYzE NovEL rEguLAriZing operAtOrS $\mathCal{R}$ AND TO anaLyzE preViousLy introduced rEguLariZIng OperaTors fOr whIcH an anAlysis Does nOt Exist in the literAturE.

The startIng PoInt Of ConstRUcting SuiTabLe regulArizing OPerAtORS $\MaThcal{R}$ is the CalderóN’s IDEnTity $\mathCal{T}_k^2=\fRAc{i}{4}-\mAThcal{K}_k^2$ [@HSiAoKLeinMAN]. The rEgulARiZing operAtors $\mAThCaL{R}$ shoulD tHus resEmBle The ElectRIc fiEld opeRator $\matHcal{T}_K$. if the choice $\matHCal{R}=\mathcal{T}_k$ WErE MAdE, The eNsuIng CFIER opeRatoRS wouLd noT Be InjECtive Since FoR CeRTain wavenumbers $k$ the OpEratorS $\frac{i}{2}-\mathcal{K}_k$ are Not injectiVE [@cOltonKreSs; @HsIAokLeinman]. In order To ensUre the injeCTivity of The reSulting CfIER operaTORs, one strAteGy iS to ModIFY tHe wavenumber iN THe deFiNition oF thE regulaRizIng OpeRatOr $\Mathcal{R}=\mAthcal{T}_k$. spEcIfIcAllY, we prOPose a genErAl rEgUlaRizinG OperatOr $\matHcal{r}$ oF tHE foRm $$\label{EQ:dEFr}
\matHcAl{r} = \eta\ \MatHbF{n}\timEs \maTHbf{s}_K +\zeta\ \mAthcal{T}^1_K\ {\rM diV}_\gammA$$ wHeRe $\eta$ anD $\zeta$ are complEx Numbers and $k$ iS a cOmplex WAVenumber Such that $\Im K>0$. Given the starTIng poinT, we Refer To thE CFIER opeRatOrs thuS coNStructEd as CaLderóN CfIEr. wE
mathbf{n}\times \mathbf{I} ,\ \xi\in\ mathb b{R }$[@ Harr ingt onMautz; @Colt o nKre ss], and thus those op erato rs $\ma t hc al{R} $ are n o tr e gul ar iz ing  o p er ators  fo r $\mat hcal{T}_k$ . I f$\mathcal{R} $  i s chosen a s a  right regul ari zing o pe rat o r for  $\ mathc al{T}_ k $, the  integral  o p erator on thel e ft  han d side of (\[eq:C F IE \ _R\]) is a sec ond ki nd Fr e d hol m o perator, a nd , thu s , the u n iq u e sol v ability of eq uation (\[e q :CF IE\_R\ ])  is equiva lentto the  injectivit y of  the left -hand- s ide ope r ator. O perato rs$\m athc a l{ R} $ w it h  th e  a for e men tioned p ro pe rty h aveb e e n  pro pos ed a nd an alyzed in the  li tera t ure  [@tu rc1].  The  a im of  thispaper  i s to present agene ral strat egy  t o p ro ducea nd ana lyz e n ovel re gulariz i ngop e r a to rs $\mathcal{R}$ a nd t oanalyzeprevio u sl yi ntroduce dreg ular i z ing o pera t or s for wh ich an an al ysis do es  not e xi stinthe l i tera ture.
The sta rting point of const r ucting suitab l er e gu l ariz ing  operators$\ma t hcal {R}$ is  th e  Cald erón’ si de n tity $\mathcal{T}_k ^2 =\frac {I}{4 }-\mathcal{K} _k^2$ [@Hs i a o Kleinman ]. T h er egularizing op erato rs $\mathc a l{R}$ sh ouldthus res emble the e lectricfie ldope rat o r  $ \mathcal{T}_k $ .  Ifth e choic e $ \mathca l{R }=\ mat hca l{ T}_k$ wer e made,th een su ing  CFIE R  operato rs  wo ul d n ot be inject ive s ince  f or cer tain wa v en u m bers  $ k$  the  op er ators  $\f r ac{ I}{2}-\ mathcal{K }_k $  are  n ot  inject ive [@ColtonK re ss; @Hsiao Kl ein man].I n  order t o ensure the injectivit y  of the  re sulti ng C FIER oper ato rs, on e s t rategy  is to  modi fy  th e waven u m be r i nthe defini t i onof th eregu larizin g operator $\mathc a l{R }=\mathcal{T} _k$ . Sp e c if ica l ly ,  we  p r opo s e  a general regu larizing o pe r at or $\mathc a l{R }$  of the  form $ $\lab e l{eq:de fR}
\math cal{R} =\e ta\\ m ath bf{n}\time s \mathb f{S}_K +\ z eta\\ ma thcal {T} ^1_K\{\ rmdiv}_ \Gamma $ $ w here$\eta$  a nd $\z eta$ar e comple x numbers and $K$ is acomple x wav enu mber such  th a t $ \Im K>0$.  Giv en the sta rti ngpoint , w e  refe r to th e C F IER o pera t ors thusc on str u c te d as Calder ó n CFI ER. W e
mathbf{n}\times \mathbf{I},\_\xi\in\mathbb{R}$ [@HarringtonMautz; @ColtonKress],_and thus those operators_$\mathcal{R}$ are_not_regularizing operators_for_$\mathcal{T}_k$. If $\mathcal{R}$_is chosen as_a right regularizing operator_for $\mathcal{T}_k$, the_integral_operator on the left hand side of (\[eq:CFIE\_R\]) is a second kind Fredholm operator,_and,_thus, the_unique_solvability_of equation (\[eq:CFIE\_R\]) is equivalent_to the injectivity of the_left-hand-side operator._Operators $\mathcal{R}$ with the aforementioned property have been_proposed_and analyzed in_the literature [@turc1]. The aim of this paper is to_present a general strategy to produce_and analyze novel_regularizing_operators_$\mathcal{R}$ and to analyze_previously introduced regularizing operators for which_an analysis does not exist in_the literature.

The starting point of constructing suitable_regularizing operators $\mathcal{R}$ is the Calderón’s_identity $\mathcal{T}_k^2=\frac{I}{4}-\mathcal{K}_k^2$ [@HsiaoKleinman]. The regularizing operators_$\mathcal{R}$ should_thus resemble the electric field_operator $\mathcal{T}_k$. If_the choice_$\mathcal{R}=\mathcal{T}_k$ were made,_the ensuing CFIER operators would not_be injective since_for certain wavenumbers $k$ the operators_$\frac{I}{2}-\mathcal{K}_k$_are not injective [@ColtonKress;_@HsiaoKleinman]._In_order to_ensure the injectivity_of_the resulting_CFIER_operators, one strategy is to modify_the_wavenumber in the definition of the regularizing_operator $\mathcal{R}=\mathcal{T}_k$. Specifically, we_propose_a general regularizing operator_$\mathcal{R}$ of the form $$\label{eq:defR}
\mathcal{R}_= \eta\ \mathbf{n}\times \mathbf{S}_K +\zeta\ \mathcal{T}^1_K\_{\rm div}_\Gamma$$_where $\eta$_and $\zeta$ are complex numbers and $K$ is a complex wavenumber_such that $\Im K>0$. Given the_starting point, we refer_to the_CFIER_operators thus constructed_as_Calderón CFIER._We