{Z}$ on some Cantor set $Z$ such that both $\varphi $ and $\psi $ are conjugated to derived systems of $\alpha $. The systems $\varphi $ and $\psi $ are Kakutani strong orbit equivalent when they are strongly orbit equivalent to derived systems of $\alpha $. Thus once again, a dynamical concept such as Kakutani strong orbit equivalence is characterized by a standard concept of C\*-algebra theory — Rieffel-Morita equivalence. It is thus natural to investigate analogous C\*-algebraic descriptions of other forms of equivalence between minimal free Cantor systems.

Two minimal free systems $\left( X,\varphi,\mathbb{Z}\right) $ and $\left( Y,\psi,\mathbb{Z}\right) $ are flip-Kakutani equivalent if $\left(
X,\varphi,\mathbb{Z}\right) $ is Kakutani equivalent to either $\left(
Y,\varphi,\mathbb{Z}\right) $ or its time reversed system $\left( Y,\varphi
\circ \sigma,\mathbb{Z}\right) $ where $\sigma :z\in \mathbb{Z}\mapsto -z$. Now, $\sigma $ is the only automorphism of $\mathbb{Z}$ besides the identity, but the situation is more complicated for $\mathbb{Z}^{d}$ in general. To generalize the notion of flip-Kakutani equivalence, S. Lightwood and the second author introduced in [@Lightwood07] the notion of orbit injection equivalence between minimal free actions of $\mathbb{Z}^{d}$ on the Cantor set. In general, for an action $\alpha $ of $\mathbb{Z}^{d}$ on a set $Z$ we denote the image of $z\in \mathbb{Z}^{d}$ by $\alpha ^{z}$. We recall from [@Lightwood07]:

\[OrbitInjection\]Let $\left( X,\varphi,\mathbb{Z}^{d}\right) $ and $%
\left( Y,\psi,\mathbb{Z}^{d}\right) $ be two free dynamical systems. Then a map $\theta :X\rightarrow Y$ is an *orbit injection* from $\left(
X,\varphi,\mathbb{Z}^{d}\right) $ to $\left( Y,\psi,\mathbb{Z}^{d}\right) $ when $\theta $ is a continuous open injection such that for all $x,y\in X$ we have:
{ Z}$ on some Cantor set $ Z$ such that both $ \varphi $ and $ \psi $ are conjugated to derived systems of $ \alpha $. The system $ \varphi $ and $ \psi $ are Kakutani impregnable orbit equivalent when they are strongly orbit equivalent to derived system of $ \alpha $. Thus once again, a dynamical concept such as Kakutani solid scope equivalence is characterized by a standard concept of C\*-algebra theory — Rieffel - Morita equivalence. It is therefore natural to investigate analogous C\*-algebraic descriptions of other forms of equality between minimal free Cantor systems. 

 Two minimal free systems $ \left (X,\varphi,\mathbb{Z}\right) $ and $ \left (Y,\psi,\mathbb{Z}\right) $ are flip - Kakutani equivalent if $ \left (
 X,\varphi,\mathbb{Z}\right) $ is Kakutani equivalent to either $ \left (
 Y,\varphi,\mathbb{Z}\right) $ or its clock time reversed system $ \left (Y,\varphi 
 \circ \sigma,\mathbb{Z}\right) $ where $ \sigma: z\in \mathbb{Z}\mapsto -z$. Now, $ \sigma $ is the alone automorphism of $ \mathbb{Z}$ besides the identity, but the situation is more complicated for $ \mathbb{Z}^{d}$ in general. To generalize the notion of flip - Kakutani equality, S. Lightwood and the second author introduced in [ @Lightwood07 ] the notion of orbit injection equivalence between minimal spare actions of $ \mathbb{Z}^{d}$ on the Cantor set. In general, for an action $ \alpha $ of $ \mathbb{Z}^{d}$ on a set $ Z$ we denote the image of $ z\in \mathbb{Z}^{d}$ by $ \alpha ^{z}$. We recall from [ @Lightwood07 ]: 

 \[OrbitInjection\]Let $ \left (X,\varphi,\mathbb{Z}^{d}\right) $ and $% 
 \left (Y,\psi,\mathbb{Z}^{d}\right) $ be two free dynamical systems. Then a map $ \theta: X\rightarrow Y$ is an * orbit injection * from $ \left (
 X,\varphi,\mathbb{Z}^{d}\right) $ to $ \left (Y,\psi,\mathbb{Z}^{d}\right) $ when $ \theta $ is a continuous open injection such that for all $ x, y\in X$ we have:
{Z}$ oj some Cantor set $Z$ such that both $\varpku $ and $\psi $ zre conjjgated to derived systems of $\aopha $. The systems $\varphi $ avd $\psi $ age Kakutabi surong orbit equivement whcu theg are wtrongly orbit equivalend to derived sfsgels of $\alpha $. Thus once again, a dynaiical cpnfept such as Kwkutsgi sfgokg orbit equivalence is charactedized bj a standard concrpt of C\*-algebra theory — Rifffep-Morita equivalencf. It is thuw naeyral to invertigate analogous C\*-alggbraic descriptions of other foros of equivalenxe behfeen minimao frev Cantor systcks.

Two kinimal free systems $\kefv( X,\vqrphi,\mathbb{Z}\right) $ anv $\left( Y,\psi,\mathbb{Z}\ridht) $ are xlnp-Kakutani equivalent id $\lefj(
X,\var[hi,\mxrhbc{Z}\rjgit) $ is Kanuteni equivalsnt to eithwr $\left(
Y,\varphi,\mathbn{Z}\wpbht) $ or its fime rqvqrsed system $\left( Y,\varphi
\circ \sigma,\mathtb{Z}\dight) $ where $\sigma :z\in \nathbb{Z}\mapsto -z$. Now, $\slgma $ is ehe only automorphism of $\mathbb{Z}$ besides the idendity, uug tkc rutkation is more complicated for $\mathbb{Z}^{d}$ in gegsrsl. To generalize the notion ov gjip-Kakutani eduivalzhcs, S. Lightwood and hhe secjnd aythor intwoduved in [@Lightwood07] the notion of orbit inlecrion equivalence bztween minimcl freg actipns of $\mathbb{Z}^{d}$ on the Eantor set. In genfral, for zv action $\alpha $ uf $\kadhbb{Z}^{d}$ on a set $Z$ we denotq the imaje of $z\in \maghbb{E}^{d}$ by $\ajpha ^{z}$. We gecall from [@Lightwood07]:

\[OrbltInjgction\]Net $\left( X,\garphi,\mathbb{Z}^{d}\right) $ and $%
\left( Y,\'xi,\mathbb{Z}^{d}\ribhd) $ te two fxee dykamical systems. Then a map $\thgta :X\righcarrow Y$ is an *ogbit injertion* from $\lqft(
X,\varphi,\matvhb{Z}^{d}\right) $ tm $\left( Y,\[si,\mqthbv{Z}^{d}\righg) $ when $\theta $ os a contpnbous open injection such thet fud all $x,y\in X$ we hace:
{Z}$ on some Cantor set $Z$ such $\varphi and $\psi are conjugated to The $\varphi $ and $ are Kakutani orbit equivalent when they are strongly equivalent to derived systems of $\alpha $. Thus once again, a dynamical concept as Kakutani strong orbit equivalence is characterized by a standard concept of C\*-algebra — equivalence. is natural to investigate analogous C\*-algebraic descriptions of other forms of equivalence between minimal free Cantor systems. minimal free systems $\left( X,\varphi,\mathbb{Z}\right) $ and $\left( $ are flip-Kakutani equivalent $\left( X,\varphi,\mathbb{Z}\right) $ is Kakutani to $\left( Y,\varphi,\mathbb{Z}\right) or time system $\left( Y,\varphi \sigma,\mathbb{Z}\right) $ where $\sigma :z\in \mathbb{Z}\mapsto -z$. Now, $\sigma $ is the only automorphism of $\mathbb{Z}$ besides identity, but is more for in To generalize the flip-Kakutani equivalence, S. Lightwood and the in [@Lightwood07] the notion of orbit injection equivalence minimal free of $\mathbb{Z}^{d}$ on the Cantor set. general, for an action $\alpha $ of $\mathbb{Z}^{d}$ a set $Z$ we denote the image of $z\in \mathbb{Z}^{d}$ by $\alpha ^{z}$. We recall \[OrbitInjection\]Let $\left( X,\varphi,\mathbb{Z}^{d}\right) $ $% \left( Y,\psi,\mathbb{Z}^{d}\right) be free systems. a map :X\rightarrow Y$ is an *orbit injection* from $\left( X,\varphi,\mathbb{Z}^{d}\right) $ to Y,\psi,\mathbb{Z}^{d}\right) $ when $\theta $ is a continuous open injection for $x,y\in X$ we
{Z}$ on some Cantor set $Z$ such that Both $\varphi $ And $\psI $ arE coNjUgatEd to Derived systems OF $\alpHa $. The systems $\varphi $ and $\pSi $ are kaKUtanI StRong oRbit equIVaLENt wHeN tHey ArE StRonglY orBit equiValent to deRivEd Systems of $\alpHA $. THus once agaIn, a Dynamical conCepT such aS KAkuTAni stRonG orbiT equivALence iS characteRiZEd by a sTAndard cONCePt of c\*-algebra theory — RieFFeL-morita equivaleNce. It iS tHUs NATurAl tO investigaTe AnaloGOus C\*-algEBrAIC DesCRiptions of othEr forms of eqUIvaLence bEtWeeN MinimaL free caNTor Systems.

Two mInimAl free sysTems $\leFT( X,\varphI,\Mathbb{Z}\Right) $ aNd $\lEft( y,\psi,\MAtHbB{Z}\rIgHT) $ arE FlIp-KAKutAni equivAlEnT if $\leFt(
X,\vARPHI,\matHbb{z}\rigHt) $ is KAkutani equivaLenT to eITheR $\left(
y,\varpHi,\maThBb{Z}\riGht) $ or iTs timE rEversed system $\leFt( Y,\vArphi
\circ \SigMa,\MatHbB{Z}\rigHT) $ where $\SigMa :z\In \mathbB{Z}\mapstO -Z$. NoW, $\sIGMA $ iS the only automorphiSm OF $\MaThbb{Z}$ besIdes thE IdEnTIty, but thE sItuAtioN IS more CompLIcAted for $\mAthbb{Z}^{D}$ In GeNeral. To GeNeraliZe The NotIon of FLip-KAkutanI equivalEnce, S. lIghtwood and the SEcond author inTRoDUCeD In [@LiGhtWood07] the notiOn of ORbit InjeCTiOn eQUivalEnce bEtWEeN Minimal free actions oF $\mAthbb{Z}^{D}$ on thE Cantor set. In gEneral, for aN ACTion $\alphA $ of $\mAThBB{Z}^{d}$ on a set $Z$ we deNote tHe image of $z\IN \mathbb{Z}^{D}$ by $\alPha ^{z}$. We reCall from [@LIGHtwood07]:

\[OrBitinjEctIon\]lET $\lEft( X,\varphi,\matHBB{Z}^{d}\rIgHt) $ and $%
\leFt( Y,\Psi,\mathBb{Z}^{D}\riGht) $ Be tWo Free dynamIcal systEmS. THeN a Map $\Theta :x\RightarrOw y$ is An *OrbIt injECtion* fRom $\leFt(
X,\vArPhI,\MatHbb{Z}^{d}\riGHt) $ TO $\Left( y,\pSi,\MathBb{Z}^{D}\rIght) $ wHen $\tHEta $ Is a contInuous opeN inJEctiOn SuCh that fOr all $x,y\in X$ we hAvE:
{Z}$ on some Cantor set $Z $ such tha t bot h $ \va rp hi $  and  $\psi $ are c o njug ated to derived system s of$\ a lpha $.  Thesystems $\ v a rph i$and  $ \ ps i $ a reKakutan i strong o rbi tequivalent w h en  they arestr ongly orbitequ ivalen ttod erive d s ystem s of $ \ alpha$. Thus o nc e  again ,  a dyna m i ca l co ncept such as Kak u ta n i strong orbit  equiv al e nc e ischa racterized  b y a s t andardc on c e p t o f  C\*-algebratheory — Ri e ffe l-Mori ta  eq u ivalen ce. I ti s t hus natural  toinvestiga te ana l ogous C \ *-algeb raic d esc rip tion s  o foth er for m sofe qui valencebe tw een m inim a l f reeCan torsyste ms.

Two mini mal  fre e  sy stems  $\le ft(X, \varp hi,\ma thbb{ Z} \right) $ and $ \lef t( Y,\psi ,\m at hbb {Z }\rig h t) $ a refli p-Kakut ani equ i val en t i f$\left(
X,\varphi, \m a t hb b{Z}\rig ht) $i sKa k utani eq ui val entt o  eith er $ \ le ft(
Y,\v arphi, \ ma th bb{Z}\r ig ht) $or  it s t ime r e vers ed sys tem $\le ft( Y , \varphi
\circ\ sigma,\mathbb { Z} \ r ig h t) $  wh ere $\sigma  :z\ i n \m athb b {Z }\m a psto-z$.No w ,$ \sigma $ is the onl yautomo rphis m of $\mathbb {Z}$ besid e s the iden tity ,  b u t the situatio n ismore compl i cated fo r $\m athbb{Z} ^{d}$ ing e neral. T o g ene ral ize t he  notion of fl i p -Kak ut ani equ iva lence,S.Lig htw ood  a nd the se cond aut ho rin tr odu ced i n  [@Light wo od0 7]  th e not i on oforbit  inj ec ti o n e quivale n ce b etwe en  m inim alfr ee ac tion s  of  $\math bb{Z}^{d} $ o n  the  C an tor set . In general,  f or an acti on  $\ alpha$ of $\mat hbb{Z}^{d}$ on a set $Z $  we den ote  theimag e of $z\i n \ mathbb {Z} ^ {d}$ b y $\al pha ^ {z }$. W e rec a l lfro m[@Lightwoo d 0 7]: 

\[O rb itIn jection \]Let $\left( X,\v a rph i,\mathbb{Z}^ {d} \rig h t )$ a n d$ %
\ le f t(Y , \psi,\mathbb{Z} ^{d}\right )$  b e two free dyn am ical sy stems.Thena  map $\ theta :X\ rightarro wY$ i s an*orbit inj ection*from $\le f t(
X, \ va rphi, \ma thbb{Z }^ {d} \righ t) $ t o  $\ left(  Y,\ps i, \mathb b{Z}^ {d }\right)  $ when $\theta $ is acontin uousope n injecti ons uch  that for  all  $x,y\in X $ w e h ave:
{Z}$ on_some Cantor_set $Z$ such that_both $\varphi_$_and $\psi_$_are conjugated to_derived systems of_$\alpha $. The systems_$\varphi $ and_$\psi_$ are Kakutani strong orbit equivalent when they are strongly orbit equivalent to derived_systems_of $\alpha_$._Thus_once again, a dynamical concept_such as Kakutani strong orbit_equivalence is_characterized by a standard concept of C\*-algebra theory_—_Rieffel-Morita equivalence. It_is thus natural to investigate analogous C\*-algebraic descriptions of_other forms of equivalence between minimal_free Cantor systems.

Two_minimal_free_systems $\left( X,\varphi,\mathbb{Z}\right) $_and $\left( Y,\psi,\mathbb{Z}\right) $ are flip-Kakutani_equivalent if $\left(
X,\varphi,\mathbb{Z}\right) $ is Kakutani_equivalent to either $\left(
Y,\varphi,\mathbb{Z}\right) $ or its_time reversed system $\left( Y,\varphi
\circ \sigma,\mathbb{Z}\right)_$ where $\sigma :z\in \mathbb{Z}\mapsto_-z$. Now,_$\sigma $ is the only_automorphism of $\mathbb{Z}$_besides the_identity, but the_situation is more complicated for $\mathbb{Z}^{d}$_in general. To_generalize the notion of flip-Kakutani equivalence,_S._Lightwood and the_second_author_introduced in_[@Lightwood07] the notion_of_orbit injection_equivalence_between minimal free actions of $\mathbb{Z}^{d}$_on_the Cantor set. In general, for an_action $\alpha $ of_$\mathbb{Z}^{d}$_on a set $Z$_we denote the image of_$z\in \mathbb{Z}^{d}$ by $\alpha ^{z}$. We_recall from_[@Lightwood07]:

\[OrbitInjection\]Let $\left(_X,\varphi,\mathbb{Z}^{d}\right) $ and $%
\left( Y,\psi,\mathbb{Z}^{d}\right) $ be two free dynamical systems._Then a map $\theta :X\rightarrow Y$_is an *orbit injection*_from $\left(
X,\varphi,\mathbb{Z}^{d}\right)_$_to $\left( Y,\psi,\mathbb{Z}^{d}\right)_$_when $\theta_$ is a continuous open injection such_that for_all $x,y\in X$ we have: