.

Eq. (\[crossintsol\]) for the radiator and hence (\[crossdiff\]) for the cross sections, is applicable, with power and subleading logarithmic corrections for values of $\tau_a$ away from the end-point region, where the variable $x$ in Eq. (\[xdef\]) becomes of order unity. That is, we require $[\beta_0/(2 \pi)] \as \ln (1/\tau_a)$ $< 1$, or equivalently $\tau_a > \LQCD/Q$. For $\tau_a \sim \LQCD/Q$ non-perturbative corrections become dominant. In this range of $\tau_a$, we “freeze” the perturbative contribution to the cross section, following [@KorMor98; @Korchemsky:2000kp], R\_ (\_a,Q,) (\_a - \^[-\_E]{} ) R\^ (\_a,Q ) + (\^[-\_E]{} -\_a ) R\^ (,Q ), \[freeze\] where $R^{\mbox{\tiny NLL}}$ is evaluated according to (\[intinv\]) and (\[match\]), and where $\kappa$ is a nonperturbative cutoff. Dynamics below the scale $\kappa$ will be incorporated into the nonperturbative corrections, in a manner we will discuss below. For our numerical studies we pick $\kappa = 0.75$ GeV, as in [@KorMor98].

The Scaling Rule
================

We are now ready to derive the scaling relation for nonperturbative shape functions. We show first how the rule is implied by the resummed cross section that we have just described, and go on to interpret the physical content of the scaling.

From resummations to shape functions
------------------------------------

Following Ref. [@KorSt99], we identify the power structure of nonperturbative corrections by a direct expansion of the integrand in the resummed exponent at momentum scales below an infrared factorization scale, $\kappa$. Although this scale need not be exactly the same as the scale in Eq. (\[freeze\]) at which the radiator is frozen, they are closely related, and we will use the same symbol for both. We thus rewrite Eq. (\[thrustcomp\]) as the sum of a perturbative term, summarizing all $p_T>\kappa$, and a soft term, containing the nonperturbative physics of strong coupling. This corresponds to $p_
. 

 Eq.   (\[crossintsol\ ]) for the radiator and hence (\[crossdiff\ ]) for the cross sections, is applicable, with power and subleading logarithmic correction for value of $ \tau_a$ away from the end - point area, where the variable $ x$ in Eq.   (\[xdef\ ]) becomes of order integrity. That is, we require $ [ \beta_0/(2 \pi) ] \as \ln (1/\tau_a)$ $ < 1 $, or equivalently $ \tau_a > \LQCD / Q$. For $ \tau_a \sim \LQCD / Q$ non - perturbative corrections become prevailing. In this compass of $ \tau_a$, we “ freeze ” the perturbative contribution to the cross incision, following [ @KorMor98; @Korchemsky:2000kp ], R\ _ (\_a, Q ,) (\_a - \^[-\_E ] { }) R\^ (\_a, Q) + (\^[-\_E ] { } -\_a) R\^ (, Q), \[freeze\ ] where $ R^{\mbox{\tiny NLL}}$ is evaluated harmonize to (\[intinv\ ]) and (\[match\ ]), and where $ \kappa$ is a nonperturbative cutoff. Dynamics below the scale $ \kappa$ will be incorporated into the nonperturbative corrections, in a manner we will discourse below. For our numerical studies we pluck $ \kappa = 0.75 $ GeV, as in [ @KorMor98 ]. 

 The Scaling Rule 
 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 

 We are now ready to derive the scaling relation for nonperturbative human body functions. We show first how the rule is implied by the resummed cross incision that we have just described, and go on to interpret the physical content of the scaling. 

 From resummations to shape functions 
 ------------------------------------ 

 Following Ref.   [ @KorSt99 ], we identify the power structure of nonperturbative corrections by a direct expansion of the integrand in the resummed exponent at momentum scales below an infrared factorization scale, $ \kappa$. Although this plate need not be precisely the same as the plate in Eq.   (\[freeze\ ]) at which the radiator is fixed, they are close related, and we will use the same symbol for both. We thus rewrite Eq.   (\[thrustcomp\ ]) as the sum of a perturbative term, summarizing all $ p_T>\kappa$, and a soft condition, containing the nonperturbative physics of strong coupling. This corresponds to $ p _
.

Eq. (\[cgossintsol\]) for the radiauor and hence (\[crossdiff\]) hor the cross sdctions, is applicable, with plwwr ane subleading logarithmkc correcnions for valnes of $\tau_a$ away from thc end-llint cegion, where thg variable $x$ in Eq. (\[xdef\]) becmmds of order unity. That is, we require $[\feta_0/(2 \pi)] \ad \ln (1/\tau_a)$ $< 1$, or equpvwlenfly $\tau_a > \LQCD/Q$. For $\tau_a \sim \LQCD/Q$ non-peruurbative correctipns become dominant. In thid rajge of $\tau_a$, we “frefze” the perjhrbwrive contribjtion to the cross secjion, following [@KorMor98; @Korchemsky:2000yp], R\_ (\_c,Q,) (\_a - \^[-\_E]{} ) R\^ (\_q,Q ) + (\^[-\_F]{} -\_a ) R\^ (,Q ), \[frxeze\] wrere $R^{\mbox{\tikj NLL}}$ iv evalusted according to (\[inrinv\]) and (\[match\]), and whxre $\kappa$ is a nonpetturbative cbtoff. Dynamics below rhw scane $\kdppa$ qilu bt iicodporatfd mnto the nohperturbatice corrections, in a mwbner we will siscusf felow. For our numerical studies we pick $\kalpa = 0.75$ GeV, as in [@KorMor98].

Tye Scaling Rule
================

We are now readr to derive the scaling relation for nonperturbathve siaoe ymkctiubs. We show first how the rule is implied by the dexukmed cross secbion that we have kudt qescribed, and go on to interpret the phydical cjntenr of the fcalong.

From resummations to shape functions
------------------------------------

Yoloowing Ref. [@KorSt99], we identify tke powgr stricture of nonperturbatire cordections by a direct dxpansion of the innegrdnd in the resummed exponegt at momxntum scales belpw an ynfrared fwctorlsation scale, $\kappa$. Althluch this scwle need not be exactly the samx as the scalg it Ex. (\[freeze\]) ct whigh the radiator is frozen, thei are clofely felated, ans we winl use the fame symbol fmt both. We thuv rewritq Eq. (\[rhruwtcomp\]) xr the sum of a perturbanire term, symmarizing all $p_T>\keppa$, znd a soft term, cobtaining the nompeftuwbwtmve prfsics of strmng zouoking. Ghis corresionas tp $p_
. Eq. (\[crossintsol\]) for the radiator and for cross sections, applicable, with power values $\tau_a$ away from end-point region, where variable $x$ in Eq. (\[xdef\]) becomes order unity. That is, we require $[\beta_0/(2 \pi)] \as \ln (1/\tau_a)$ $< 1$, equivalently $\tau_a > \LQCD/Q$. For $\tau_a \sim \LQCD/Q$ non-perturbative corrections become dominant. In range $\tau_a$, “freeze” perturbative contribution to the cross section, following [@KorMor98; @Korchemsky:2000kp], R\_ (\_a,Q,) (\_a - \^[-\_E]{} ) R\^ ) + (\^[-\_E]{} -\_a ) R\^ (,Q ), where $R^{\mbox{\tiny NLL}}$ is according to (\[intinv\]) and (\[match\]), where is a cutoff. below scale $\kappa$ will incorporated into the nonperturbative corrections, in a manner we will discuss below. For our numerical studies we $\kappa = as in The Rule We are now derive the scaling relation for nonperturbative show first how the rule is implied by resummed cross that we have just described, and on to interpret the physical content of the From resummations to shape functions ------------------------------------ Following Ref. [@KorSt99], we identify the power structure of by a direct expansion the integrand in resummed at scales an infrared scale, $\kappa$. Although this scale need not be exactly the same the scale in Eq. (\[freeze\]) at which the radiator is are related, and we use the same symbol both. thus rewrite Eq. (\[thrustcomp\]) sum a all and soft term, containing the physics of strong coupling. This to $p_
.

Eq. (\[crossintsol\]) for the radiatOr and hence (\[CrossDifF\]) foR tHe crOss sEctions, is appliCAble, With power and subleading LogarItHMic cORrEctioNs for vaLUeS OF $\taU_a$ AwAy fRoM ThE end-pOinT region, Where the vaRiaBlE $x$ in Eq. (\[xdef\]) beCOmEs of order uNitY. That is, we reqUirE $[\beta_0/(2 \pI)] \aS \ln (1/\TAu_a)$ $< 1$, or EquIvaleNtly $\taU_A > \LQCD/Q$. for $\tau_a \siM \LqcD/Q$ non-PErturbaTIVe CorrEctions become domiNAnT. in this range of $\tAu_a$, we “fReEZe” THE peRtuRbative conTrIbutiON to the cROsS SECtiON, following [@Kormor98; @KorchemsKY:2000kp], r\_ (\_a,Q,) (\_a - \^[-\_E]{} ) R\^ (\_A,Q ) + (\^[-\_e]{} -\_a ) R\^ (,q ), \[Freeze\] Where $r^{\mBOx{\tIny NLL}}$ is evaLuatEd accordiNg to (\[inTInv\]) and (\[mATch\]), and wHere $\kaPpa$ Is a NonpERtUrBatIvE CutOFf. dynAMicS below thE sCaLe $\kapPa$ wiLL BE IncoRpoRateD into The nonperturbAtiVe coRRecTions, In a maNner We Will dIscuss Below. foR our numerical stUdieS we pick $\kaPpa = 0.75$ gev, as In [@korMoR98].

the ScaLinG RuLe
================

We are Now readY To dErIVE ThE scaling relation foR nONPeRturbatiVe shapE FuNcTIons. We shOw FirSt hoW THe rulE is iMPlIed by the ResummED cRoSs sectiOn That we HaVe jUst DescrIBed, aNd go on To interpRet thE Physical contenT Of the scaling.

FROm RESuMMatiOns To shape funcTionS
------------------------------------

follOwinG reF. [@KoRst99], we iDentiFy THe POwer structure of nonpErTurbatIve coRrections by a dIrect expanSION of the inTegrANd IN the resummed exPonenT at momentuM Scales beLow an Infrared FactorizaTIOn scale, $\kAppA$. AlThoUgh THIs Scale need not bE EXactLy The same As tHe scale In EQ. (\[frEezE\]) at WhIch the radIator is fRoZeN, tHeY arE closELy relateD, aNd wE wIll Use thE Same syMbol fOr boTh. we THus Rewrite eQ. (\[tHRUstcOmP\]) aS the Sum Of A pertUrbaTIve Term, sumMarizing aLl $p_t>\KappA$, aNd A soft teRm, containing tHe NonperturbAtIve PhysicS OF strong cOupling. This corresponds tO $P_
.

Eq. (\[crossintsol\]) f or the rad iator  an d h en ce ( \[cr ossdiff\]) for thecross sections, is app licab le ,  wit h  p owerand sub l ea d i nglo ga rit hm i ccorre cti ons for  values of  $\ ta u_a$ away fr o mthe end-po int  region, whe rethe va ri abl e  $x$inEq. ( \[xdef \ ]) bec omes of o rd e r unit y . Thati s ,we r equire $[\beta_0/ ( 2\ pi)] \as \ln ( 1/\tau _a ) $$ <  1$ , o r equivale nt ly $\ t au_a >\ LQ C D / Q$. For $\tau_a \ sim \LQCD/Q $  no n-pert ur bat i ve cor recti on s  be come domina nt.In this r ange o f  $\tau_ a $, we “ freeze ” t hepert u rb at ive  c o ntr i bu tio n  to  the cro ss  s ectio n, f o l l o wing  [@ KorM or98;  @Korchemsky: 200 0kp] ,  R\ _ (\_ a,Q,)  (\_ a- \^[ -\_E]{ } ) R \^  (\_a,Q ) + (\^ [-\_ E]{} -\_a  )R\ ^ ( ,Q  ), \ [ freeze \]whe re $R^{ \mbox{\ t iny  N L L } }$  is evaluated acco rd i n gto (\[in tinv\] )  a nd (\[match \] ),andw h ere $ \kap p a$  is a no npertu r ba ti ve cuto ff . Dyna mi csbel ow th e  sca le $\k appa$ wi ll be incorporated i n to the nonper t ur b a ti v e co rre ctions, ina ma n nerwe w i ll  di s cussbelow .F or our numerical studi es  we pi ck $\ kappa = 0.75$  GeV, as i n [ @KorMor9 8].Th e  Scaling Rule===== ========== = 

We are  nowready to  derive t h e  scaling  re lat ion  fo r no nperturbative s hape  f unction s.We show  fi rst  ho w t he  rule isimpliedby  t he  r esu mmedc ross sec ti onth atwe ha v e just  desc ribe d,  a n d g o on to in t e rpre tth e ph ysi ca l con tent ofthe sca ling.

Fr omr esum ma ti ons toshape functio ns 
--------- -- --- ------ - - -------- ------

Following Ref.[ @KorSt9 9],  we i dent ify the p owe r stru ctu r e of n onpert urbat iv e c o r recti o n sbyadirect exp a n sio n ofth e in tegrand  in the resummed e x pon ent at moment umscal e s  b elo w  a n  in fr a red f actorization sc ale, $\kap pa $ .Although t h issc ale nee d not b e exa c tly the  same asthe scale  i n Eq . (\[ freeze\])at which  the radi a tor i s  f rozen , t hey ar eclo selyrelate d , a nd we  willus e thesamesy mbol for  both. We thus rewriteEq. (\ [thru stc omp\]) as  th e  su m of a pe rtur bative ter m,sum mariz ing all $ p_T> \ ka ppa $ , and  a s o ft term,c on tai n i ng  the nonper t u r bat ive p hys i cs ofstro ng coupling. This corresponds to  $p_ 
.

Eq. (\[crossintsol\]) for_the radiator_and hence (\[crossdiff\]) for_the cross_sections,_is applicable,_with_power and subleading_logarithmic corrections for_values of $\tau_a$ away_from the end-point_region,_where the variable $x$ in Eq. (\[xdef\]) becomes of order unity. That is, we require_$[\beta_0/(2_\pi)] \as_\ln_(1/\tau_a)$_$< 1$, or equivalently $\tau_a_> \LQCD/Q$. For $\tau_a \sim_\LQCD/Q$ non-perturbative_corrections become dominant. In this range of $\tau_a$,_we_“freeze” the perturbative_contribution to the cross section, following [@KorMor98; @Korchemsky:2000kp], R\__(\_a,Q,) (\_a - \^[-\_E]{} ) R\^_(\_a,Q ) +_(\^[-\_E]{}_-\_a_) R\^ (,Q ),_\[freeze\] where $R^{\mbox{\tiny NLL}}$ is evaluated_according to (\[intinv\]) and (\[match\]), and_where $\kappa$ is a nonperturbative cutoff. Dynamics_below the scale $\kappa$ will be_incorporated into the nonperturbative corrections,_in a_manner we will discuss below._For our numerical_studies we_pick $\kappa =_0.75$ GeV, as in [@KorMor98].

The Scaling_Rule
================

We are now_ready to derive the scaling relation_for_nonperturbative shape functions._We_show_first how_the rule is_implied_by the_resummed_cross section that we have just_described,_and go on to interpret the physical_content of the scaling.

From_resummations_to shape functions
------------------------------------

Following Ref. [@KorSt99],_we identify the power structure_of nonperturbative corrections by a direct_expansion of_the integrand_in the resummed exponent at momentum scales below an infrared factorization_scale, $\kappa$. Although this scale need_not be exactly the_same as_the_scale in Eq. (\[freeze\])_at_which the_radiator is frozen, they are closely related,_and we_will use the same symbol for_both. We thus rewrite_Eq. (\[thrustcomp\])_as the sum of a perturbative_term, summarizing all $p_T>\kappa$, and a_soft term, containing the nonperturbative_physics_of_strong coupling. This corresponds to_$p_