 with $q\leq p<\infty$, $$\Bigl(\int_{i{\mathfrak{a}}^*}|\mathcal{F}f(\lambda+\eta)|^p\,d\nu(\lambda)\Bigr)^{1/p}\leq C_{p,q,\eta}\|f\|_{(p)}$$ for every $\eta$ in the interior of $C(\epsilon_p\rho)$.

Note that the special case $p=q=r=2$ recovers the a special case of the Hausdorff–Young inequality in lemma \[HL-ineq2\] and the Plancherel formula as an inequality in the case $\eta=0$.

Fix $q\in(1,2]$ and consider the measure spaces $({\mathfrak{a}}_+,d\mu)$ and $(i{\mathfrak{a}}^+,d\overline{\nu}(\lambda)$, where $d\overline{\nu}(\lambda)=\|\lambda\|^{-nq}|{\mathbf{c}}(\lambda)|^{-2(1-nq)}\,d\lambda$. Define $Tf$, $f\in L^p({\mathfrak{a}},d\mu)^W$, by $Tf(\lambda)=|\mathcal{F}f(\lambda+\eta)|(\|\lambda\||{\mathbf{c}}(\lambda)|^{-2})^{\frac{q\cdot n}{q'}}$. It then follows from lemma \[lemma.NPP-2\] that $$\|Tf\|_{q'}^{q'} =\int_{i{\mathfrak{a}}^*} |Tf(\lambda)|^{q'}\|\lambda\|^{-nq}|{\mathbf{c}}(\lambda)|^{-2(1-nq)}\,d\lambda=
\int_{i{\mathfrak{a}}^*}|\mathcal{F}f(\lambda+\eta)|^{q'}|{\mathbf{c}}(\lambda)|^{-2}\,d\lambda \leq C_{p,q,\eta}\|f\|_q^{q'},$$ so $T$ is of strong type $(q,q')$.

The operator $T$ is furthermore of weak type $(1,1)$, as we shall now prove. The argument is nearly the same as in the proof of theorem \[thm.HY-qlarge\] but relies on a clever trick employed in the proof of [@Ray-Sarkar-trans Theorem 4.11]. For $t>0$ define the set $E_t(f)=\{\lambda\in i
with $ q\leq p<\infty$, $ $ \Bigl(\int_{i{\mathfrak{a}}^*}|\mathcal{F}f(\lambda+\eta)|^p\,d\nu(\lambda)\Bigr)^{1 / p}\leq C_{p, q,\eta}\|f\|_{(p)}$$ for every $ \eta$ in the interior of $ C(\epsilon_p\rho)$. 

 Note that the special case $ phosphorus = q = r=2 $ recover the a special case of the Hausdorff – unseasoned inequality in lemma \[HL - ineq2\ ] and the Plancherel convention as an inequality in the case $ \eta=0$. 

 Fix $ q\in(1,2]$ and consider the meter space $ ({ \mathfrak{a}}_+,d\mu)$ and $ (i{\mathfrak{a}}^+,d\overline{\nu}(\lambda)$, where $ d\overline{\nu}(\lambda)=\|\lambda\|^{-nq}|{\mathbf{c}}(\lambda)|^{-2(1 - nq)}\,d\lambda$. Define $ Tf$, $ f\in L^p({\mathfrak{a}},d\mu)^W$, by $ Tf(\lambda)=|\mathcal{F}f(\lambda+\eta)|(\|\lambda\||{\mathbf{c}}(\lambda)|^{-2})^{\frac{q\cdot n}{q'}}$. It then follows from lemma \[lemma. NPP-2\ ] that $ $ \|Tf\|_{q'}^{q' } = \int_{i{\mathfrak{a}}^ * } |Tf(\lambda)|^{q'}\|\lambda\|^{-nq}|{\mathbf{c}}(\lambda)|^{-2(1 - nq)}\,d\lambda= 
 \int_{i{\mathfrak{a}}^*}|\mathcal{F}f(\lambda+\eta)|^{q'}|{\mathbf{c}}(\lambda)|^{-2}\,d\lambda \leq C_{p, q,\eta}\|f\|_q^{q'},$$ so $ T$ is of strong type $ (q, q')$. 

 The operator $ T$ is furthermore of decrepit type $ (1,1)$, as we shall now test. The controversy is nearly the same as in the proof of theorem \[thm. HY - qlarge\ ] but relies on a clever antic employed in the proof of [ @Ray - Sarkar - trans Theorem   4.11 ]. For $ t>0 $ define the laid $ E_t(f)=\{\lambda\in i
 wihh $q\leq p<\infty$, $$\Bigl(\int_{i{\mxthfrak{a}}^*}|\mathcal{Y}d(\lambde+\eta)|^p\,d\nh(\lambda)\Bkgr)^{1/p}\leq C_{p,q,\eta}\|f\|_{(p)}$$ for every $\eva$ ib the interior of $C(\epsilon_p\fho)$.

Note tjat the wpecmal case $p=q=r=2$ recovers thc a slccial rase of the Hauxdorff–Younc inequality it uelma \[HL-ineq2\] and the Plancherel formuja as am lnequality in jhe csfe $\efa=0$.

Fix $q\in(1,2]$ and consider the measure spaces $({\mathfrak{a}}_+,d\mu)$ and $(i{\mathfrak{a}}^+,d\overline{\nu}(\pambfa)$, where $d\overline{\ju}(\lambda)=\|\lamvda\|^{-nz}|{\nathbf{c}}(\lambdx)|^{-2(1-nq)}\,d\lambda$. Define $Tf$, $f\jn L^p({\mathfrak{a}},d\mu)^W$, by $Tf(\lambda)=|\mxthcak{F}f(\lambda+\ejc)|(\|\oamhga\||{\mathbf{c}}(\lanbda)|^{-2})^{\fgac{q\cdot n}{q'}}$. Ib then xollows from lemma \[lekma.IPP-2\] rhat $$\|Tf\|_{q'}^{q'} =\int_{i{\mathfran{a}}^*} |Tf(\lambda)|^{q'}\|\lambda\|^{-gq}|{\mathbf{c}}(\najbda)|^{-2(1-nq)}\,d\lambda=
\int_{i{\narhfran{a}}^*}|\madhcau{D}f(\lxmbsa+\xta)|^{s'}|{\mathbv{c}}(\lembda)|^{-2}\,d\lambdz \leq C_{p,q,\etq}\|f\|_q^{q'},$$ so $T$ is of strpnd type $(q,q')$.

The oleratow $E$ is furthermore of weak type $(1,1)$, as we shdll now prove. The argument is nearly the same ad in the [roof of theorem \[thm.HY-qlarge\] but relies on a clevar trmcy enpjutef in the proof of [@Ray-Sarkar-trans Theorem 4.11]. For $e>0$ dtfike the set $E_t(f)=\{\laibda\in i
with $q\leq p<\infty$, $$\Bigl(\int_{i{\mathfrak{a}}^*}|\mathcal{F}f(\lambda+\eta)|^p\,d\nu(\lambda)\Bigr)^{1/p}\leq C_{p,q,\eta}\|f\|_{(p)}$$ for every the of $C(\epsilon_p\rho)$. that the special special of the Hausdorff–Young in lemma \[HL-ineq2\] the Plancherel formula as an inequality the case $\eta=0$. Fix $q\in(1,2]$ and consider the measure spaces $({\mathfrak{a}}_+,d\mu)$ and $(i{\mathfrak{a}}^+,d\overline{\nu}(\lambda)$, $d\overline{\nu}(\lambda)=\|\lambda\|^{-nq}|{\mathbf{c}}(\lambda)|^{-2(1-nq)}\,d\lambda$. Define $Tf$, $f\in L^p({\mathfrak{a}},d\mu)^W$, by $Tf(\lambda)=|\mathcal{F}f(\lambda+\eta)|(\|\lambda\||{\mathbf{c}}(\lambda)|^{-2})^{\frac{q\cdot n}{q'}}$. It then follows from lemma that =\int_{i{\mathfrak{a}}^*} \int_{i{\mathfrak{a}}^*}|\mathcal{F}f(\lambda+\eta)|^{q'}|{\mathbf{c}}(\lambda)|^{-2}\,d\lambda C_{p,q,\eta}\|f\|_q^{q'},$$ so $T$ is of strong type $(q,q')$. The operator $T$ is furthermore of weak type as we shall now prove. The argument is the same as in proof of theorem \[thm.HY-qlarge\] but on clever trick in proof [@Ray-Sarkar-trans Theorem 4.11]. $t>0$ define the set $E_t(f)=\{\lambda\in i
 with $q\leq p<\infty$, $$\Bigl(\int_{i{\matHfrak{a}}^*}|\mathCal{F}f(\LamBda+\EtA)|^p\,d\nU(\lamBda)\Bigr)^{1/p}\leq C_{p,q,\ETa}\|f\|_{(p)}$$ For every $\eta$ in the interiOr of $C(\EpSIlon_P\RhO)$.

Note That the SPeCIAl cAsE $p=Q=r=2$ rEcOVeRs the A spEcial caSe of the HauSdoRfF–Young inequaLItY in lemma \[HL-IneQ2\] and the PlancHerEl formUlA as AN ineqUalIty in The casE $\Eta=0$.

Fix $Q\in(1,2]$ and conSiDEr the mEAsure spACEs $({\MathFrak{a}}_+,d\mu)$ and $(i{\mathfRAk{A}}^+,D\overline{\nu}(\lamBda)$, wheRe $D\OvERLinE{\nu}(\Lambda)=\|\lambDa\|^{-Nq}|{\matHBf{c}}(\lambDA)|^{-2(1-nQ)}\,D\LAmbDA$. Define $Tf$, $f\in L^P({\mathfrak{a}},d\MU)^W$, bY $Tf(\lamBdA)=|\maTHcal{F}f(\LambdA+\eTA)|(\|\laMbda\||{\mathbf{c}}(\LambDa)|^{-2})^{\frac{q\cdOt n}{q'}}$. It THen follOWs from lEmma \[leMma.nPP-2\] That $$\|tF\|_{q'}^{Q'} =\iNt_{i{\MaTHfrAK{a}}^*} |tf(\lAMbdA)|^{q'}\|\lambda\|^{-Nq}|{\MaThbf{c}}(\LambDA)|^{-2(1-NQ)}\,D\lamBda=
\Int_{i{\MathfRak{a}}^*}|\mathcal{F}f(\LamBda+\eTA)|^{q'}|{\mAthbf{C}}(\lambDa)|^{-2}\,d\lAmBda \leQ C_{p,q,\etA}\|f\|_q^{q'},$$ sO $T$ Is of strong type $(q,Q')$.

The Operator $T$ Is fUrTheRmOre of WEak typE $(1,1)$, as We sHall now Prove. ThE ArgUmENT Is Nearly the same as in tHe PROoF of theorEm \[thm.Hy-QlArGE\] but reliEs On a ClevER Trick EmplOYeD in the prOof of [@RAY-SArKar-tranS THeorem 4.11]. foR $t>0$ dEfiNe the SEt $E_t(F)=\{\lambdA\in i
 with $q\leq p<\infty$, $$ \Bigl(\int _{i{\ mat hfr ak {a}} ^*}| \mathcal{F}f(\ l ambd a+\eta)|^p\,d\nu(\lamb da)\B ig r )^{1 / p} \leqC_{p,q, \ et a } \|f \| _{ (p) }$ $  f or ev ery  $\eta$  in the in ter io r of $C(\eps i lo n_p\rho)$. 

N ote that the  sp ecialca se$ p=q=r =2$  reco vers t h e a sp ecial cas eo f theH ausdorf f – Yo unginequality in lem m a\ [HL-ineq2\] an d thePl a nc h e rel  fo rmula as a ninequ a lity in th e c ase $\eta=0$.

Fi x $q\in(1,2 ] $ a nd con si der the me asure  s p ace s $({\mathf rak{ a}}_+,d\m u)$ an d  $(i{\m a thfrak{ a}}^+, d\o ver line { \n u} (\l am b da) $ ,whe r e $ d\overli ne {\ nu}(\ lamb d a ) = \|\l amb da\| ^{-nq }|{\mathbf{c} }(\ lamb d a)| ^{-2( 1-nq) }\,d \l ambda $. Def ine $ Tf $, $f\in L^p({\ math frak{a}}, d\m u) ^W$ ,by $T f (\lamb da) =|\ mathcal {F}f(\l a mbd a+ \ e t a) |(\|\lambda\||{\ma th b f {c }}(\lamb da)|^{ - 2} )^ { \frac{q\ cd otn}{q ' } }$. I t th e nfollowsfrom l e mm a\[lemma .N PP-2\]  t hat  $$ \|Tf\ | _{q' }^{q'}  =\int_{ i{\ma t hfrak{a}}^*} | T f(\lambda)|^{ q '} \ | \l a mbda \|^ {-nq}|{\mat hbf{ c }}(\ lamb d a) |^{ - 2(1-n q)}\, d\ l am b da=
\int_{i{\mathfr ak {a}}^* }|\ma thcal{F}f(\la mbda+\eta) | ^ { q'}|{\ma thbf { c} } (\lambda)|^{-2 }\,d\ lambda \le q  C_{p,q, \eta} \|f\|_q^ {q'},$$ s o $T$ is o f s tro ngtyp e $( q,q')$.

Theo p erat or  $T$ is  fu rthermo reofwea k t yp e $(1,1)$ , as wesh al lno w p rove. The argu me ntis  ne arlyt he sam e asin t he  p r oof  of the o re m \[th m. HY -qla rge \]  butreli e s o n a cle ver trick  em p loye din  the pr oof of [@Ray- Sa rkar-trans  T heo rem 4. 1 1 ]. For $ t>0$ define the set $E_ t (f)=\{\ lam bda\i n i
 with_$q\leq p<\infty$,_$$\Bigl(\int_{i{\mathfrak{a}}^*}|\mathcal{F}f(\lambda+\eta)|^p\,d\nu(\lambda)\Bigr)^{1/p}\leq C_{p,q,\eta}\|f\|_{(p)}$$ for every_$\eta$ in_the_interior of_$C(\epsilon_p\rho)$.

Note_that the special_case $p=q=r=2$ recovers_the a special case_of the Hausdorff–Young_inequality_in lemma \[HL-ineq2\] and the Plancherel formula as an inequality in the case $\eta=0$.

Fix_$q\in(1,2]$_and consider_the_measure_spaces $({\mathfrak{a}}_+,d\mu)$ and $(i{\mathfrak{a}}^+,d\overline{\nu}(\lambda)$, where_$d\overline{\nu}(\lambda)=\|\lambda\|^{-nq}|{\mathbf{c}}(\lambda)|^{-2(1-nq)}\,d\lambda$. Define $Tf$, $f\in L^p({\mathfrak{a}},d\mu)^W$,_by $Tf(\lambda)=|\mathcal{F}f(\lambda+\eta)|(\|\lambda\||{\mathbf{c}}(\lambda)|^{-2})^{\frac{q\cdot_n}{q'}}$. It then follows from lemma \[lemma.NPP-2\] that_$$\|Tf\|_{q'}^{q'}_=\int_{i{\mathfrak{a}}^*} |Tf(\lambda)|^{q'}\|\lambda\|^{-nq}|{\mathbf{c}}(\lambda)|^{-2(1-nq)}\,d\lambda=
\int_{i{\mathfrak{a}}^*}|\mathcal{F}f(\lambda+\eta)|^{q'}|{\mathbf{c}}(\lambda)|^{-2}\,d\lambda \leq_C_{p,q,\eta}\|f\|_q^{q'},$$ so $T$ is of strong type $(q,q')$.

The operator_$T$ is furthermore of weak type_$(1,1)$, as we_shall_now_prove. The argument is_nearly the same as in the_proof of theorem \[thm.HY-qlarge\] but relies_on a clever trick employed in the_proof of [@Ray-Sarkar-trans Theorem 4.11]. For $t>0$_define the set $E_t(f)=\{\lambda\in i