$, due to residual sources of chiral symmetry breaking. One of these sources is the finite extent of the fifth dimension in the domain wall fermion construction. At finite $m_{res} $, the renormalization constant of the partially conserved current, $Z^{88}_{\cal A} $, can deviate from the unit value it would take if chiral symmetry were strictly observed [@rbc2]. Secondly, note that, at finite lattice spacing $a$, there is a certain tension between adopting a mass-independent lattice renormalization scheme and maintaining $O(a)$ improvement [@luescher]. The renormalization constant $Z^{88}_{A} $ in general contains dependences of order $O(m_q a)$, evident in the slight variation displayed in Table \[zatab\]. Since the lattice data necessary to perform the continuum limit $a\rightarrow 0$ are not available, two options remain: One option would be to extrapolate $Z^{88}_{A} /Z^{88}_{\cal A} $ to the chiral limit, thus obtaining a mass-independent renormalization scheme in more direct correspondence to the $\overline{MS} $ scheme, but spoiling $O(a)$ improvement. On the other hand, by retaining the leading quark mass dependence, i.e., applying the finite-$m_{q} $ renormalization constants in Table \[zatab\] ensemble by ensemble, $O(a)$ improvement is maintained, at the expense of introducing a slight mass dependence into the renormalization scheme at finite $a$. The mass dependence, implying a breaking of chiral symmetry in addition to the one encoded in the residual mass $m_{res} $, is then expected to be of order $O(m_q a^2 )$. Since the present investigation yielded lattice data at only a single lattice spacing $a$, precluding a direct estimate of the effects of finite lattice spacing, maintaining $O(a)$ improvement seems sufficiently desirable to elect the latter alternative, i.e., applying the renormalization constants in Table \[zatab\] ensemble by ensemble and thus introducing a slight mass dependence into the renormalization scheme.

A way of estimating the systematic uncertainty in the renormalization of $\Delta s$ resulting from the residual breaking of chiral symmetry due to the above sources lies in the mismatch between the axial vector and the vector renormalization factors, $Z_A /Z_{\cal A} $ vs. $Z_V /Z_{\cal V} $, which would remain equal if chiral symmetry were strictly maintained [@rbc3]. In the
$, due to residual sources of chiral symmetry breaking. One of these sources is the finite extent of the fifth property in the knowledge domain wall fermion construction. At finite $ m_{res } $, the renormalization constant of the partially conserve current, $ Z^{88}_{\cal A } $, can deviate from the unit value it would accept if chiral symmetry were strictly observe [ @rbc2 ]. Secondly, note that, at finite lattice space $ a$, there is a certain tension between adopting a aggregate - independent lattice renormalization schema and maintaining $ O(a)$ improvement [ @luescher ]. The renormalization constant $ Z^{88}_{A } $ in cosmopolitan contains dependences of order $ O(m_q a)$, discernible in the slight variation expose in Table   \[zatab\ ]. Since the lattice datum necessary to perform the continuum terminus ad quem $ a\rightarrow 0 $ are not available, two options remain: One option would be to extrapolate $ Z^{88}_{A } /Z^{88}_{\cal vitamin a } $ to the chiral limit, thus obtaining a mass - independent renormalization schema in more direct correspondence to the $ \overline{MS } $ scheme, but spoiling $ O(a)$ improvement. On the other hand, by retaining the leading quark mass dependence, i.e., apply the finite-$m_{q } $ renormalization constants in Table   \[zatab\ ] ensemble by ensemble, $ O(a)$ improvement is maintained, at the expense of introduce a slender mass dependence into the renormalization scheme at finite $ a$. The bulk dependence, implying a breaking of chiral symmetry in accession to the one encoded in the residual mass $ m_{res } $, is then expected to be of order $ O(m_q a^2) $. Since the present investigation yielded wicket data at only a single lattice spacing $ a$, precluding a direct appraisal of the consequence of finite lattice spacing, maintaining $ O(a)$ improvement seems sufficiently desirable to elect the latter alternative, i.e., applying the renormalization constants in Table   \[zatab\ ] ensemble by ensemble and therefore introducing a flimsy mass dependence into the renormalization outline. 

 A way of calculate the systematic uncertainty in the renormalization of $ \Delta s$ result from the residual breaking of chiral isotropy due to the above sources lies in the mismatch between the axial vector and the vector renormalization factors, $ Z_A /Z_{\cal deoxyadenosine monophosphate } $ vs.   $ Z_V /Z_{\cal V } $, which would remain adequate if chiral symmetry were strictly maintained [ @rbc3 ]. In the
$, duf to residual sources of chiral symmetri vreakiig. One kf these sources is the finite extenv of the difth dimension in the domain wwll fermuon ronstruction. At hjnite $m_{vzs} $, tgc renmcmalization conxtant of tve partially cmnrexved current, $Z^{88}_{\cal A} $, can deviate froi the umih value it woujd tshe ir chiral symmetry were strictly obaerved [@gbc2]. Secondly, note that, at finite lattice spwcinh $a$, there is a cerhain tensiob beeqeen adoptine a mass-independent lajtice renormalization scheme and maincaining $O(a)$ umproggment [@lueschxr]. The renormalizabpon convtant $Z^{88}_{S} $ in general gontamns eependences of order $M(m_q a)$, evident in tre slight vcriation displayed in Tqble \[zdtab\]. Sinzw tfe mavtide datw nxcessary to perform thw continuum limit $a\tidytarrow 0$ are hot avwijable, two options remain: One option wound ge to extrapolate $Z^{88}_{A} /Z^{88}_{\cql A} $ to the chiral llmit, thus obtaining a mass-independent renormalization scheke in oort eirecg clrrespondence to the $\overline{MS} $ scheme, but s[kikikg $O(a)$ improvemenb. On the other hanc, hy tetaining the ueadiny qhark mass dependenfe, i.e., akplyint the finyte-$m_{a} $ renormalization constantw in Table \[zanab\] wnsemble by ensembpe, $O(a)$ improrement is msintained, at the expensz of ihtroducing w slight jxss dependence ivto tve renormalization scheme wt finite $a$. Tke mass aepemdence, implying w breaking of chiral symletry it addition to the one encoded in the resivnal mass $m_{res} $, hs nhen expeeted tp be of order $O(m_q a^2 )$. Since jhe preseut invdstigation yieldev lattice daea at only a vlngle latticx spacing $a$, peeclyding a airect estimatr of the vfyects of dinite lattice spaging, ozintaining $O(a)$ inprivement seems siffkciqnnly dqvirable to enect thd lattdr alternatlve, i.e., spplying the renormanizafion constants in Yanle \[zatab\] gnsemble fy ensemble amd thus introducinh a snigit masx dgpendence into the renormalizatjon schemf.

A ray of estimwtinn thg systematie uncertainty in the renormalization of $\Velta s$ resulting from rhe residual breakiug of chiral xymmeery due tm the above sources oies in the mismauch between the axial vsctor dnd tje vector renormalization factors, $Z_A /Z_{\cal A} $ vs. $Z_V /Z_{\cal V} $, which would remqin eqnaj if chiral symketry wzre stricely leintained [@rbc3]. In nhe
$, due to residual sources of chiral One these sources the finite extent the wall fermion construction. finite $m_{res} $, renormalization constant of the partially conserved $Z^{88}_{\cal A} $, can deviate from the unit value it would take if symmetry were strictly observed [@rbc2]. Secondly, note that, at finite lattice spacing $a$, is certain between a mass-independent lattice renormalization scheme and maintaining $O(a)$ improvement [@luescher]. The renormalization constant $Z^{88}_{A} $ in contains dependences of order $O(m_q a)$, evident in slight variation displayed in \[zatab\]. Since the lattice data to the continuum $a\rightarrow are available, two options One option would be to extrapolate $Z^{88}_{A} /Z^{88}_{\cal A} $ to the chiral limit, thus obtaining a renormalization scheme direct correspondence the $ but spoiling $O(a)$ the other hand, by retaining the dependence, i.e., applying the finite-$m_{q} $ renormalization constants Table \[zatab\] by ensemble, $O(a)$ improvement is maintained, the expense of introducing a slight mass dependence the renormalization scheme at finite $a$. The mass dependence, implying a breaking of chiral symmetry to the one encoded the residual mass $, then to of order a^2 )$. Since the present investigation yielded lattice data at only single lattice spacing $a$, precluding a direct estimate of the finite spacing, maintaining $O(a)$ seems sufficiently desirable to the alternative, i.e., applying the in \[zatab\] and introducing slight mass dependence into renormalization scheme. A way of the systematic uncertainty in resulting from the residual breaking of chiral symmetry to the above sources lies in the between the axial vector and the vector renormalization factors, $Z_A /Z_{\cal A} vs. $Z_V $, which would remain equal if chiral symmetry strictly maintained [@rbc3]. In
$, due to residual sources of chiRal symmetrY breaKinG. OnE oF theSe soUrces is the finiTE extEnt of the fifth dimension In the DoMAin wALl FermiOn constRUcTIOn. AT fInIte $M_{rES} $, tHe renOrmAlizatiOn constant Of tHe Partially conSErVed current, $z^{88}_{\caL A} $, can deviate FroM the unIt ValUE it woUld Take iF chiraL SymmetRy were strIcTLy obseRVed [@rbc2]. SECOnDly, nOte that, at finite laTTiCE spacing $a$, there Is a cerTaIN tENSioN beTween adoptInG a masS-IndepenDEnT LATtiCE renormalizatIon scheme anD MaiNtainiNg $o(a)$ iMProvemEnt [@luEsCHer]. the renormalIzatIon constaNt $Z^{88}_{A} $ in GEneral cONtains dEpendeNceS of OrdeR $o(m_Q a)$, EviDeNT in THe SliGHt vAriation DiSpLayed In TaBLE \[ZAtab\]. sinCe thE lattIce data necessAry To peRForM the cOntinUum lImIt $a\riGhtarrOw 0$ are NoT available, two opTionS remain: OnE opTiOn wOuLd be tO ExtrapOlaTe $Z^{88}_{a} /Z^{88}_{\cal A} $ tO the chiRAl lImIT, THuS obtaining a mass-indEpENDeNt renormAlizatIOn ScHEme in morE dIreCt coRREsponDencE To The $\overlIne{MS} $ sCHeMe, But spoiLiNg $O(a)$ imPrOveMenT. On thE OtheR hand, bY retainiNg the LEading quark masS Dependence, i.e., aPPlYINg THe fiNitE-$m_{q} $ renormalIzatIOn coNstaNTs In TABle \[zaTab\] enSeMBlE By ensemble, $O(a)$ improveMeNt is maIntaiNed, at the expenSe of introdUCINg a slighT masS DePEndence into the RenorMalization SCheme at fInite $A$. The mass DependencE, IMplying a BreAkiNg oF chIRAl Symmetry in addITIon tO tHe one enCodEd in the ResIduAl mAss $M_{rEs} $, is then eXpected tO bE oF oRdEr $O(M_q a^2 )$. SiNCe the preSeNt iNvEstIgatiON yieldEd latTice DaTa AT onLy a singLE lATTice SpAcIng $a$, PreClUding A dirECt eStimate Of the effeCts OF finItE lAttice sPacing, maintaiNiNg $O(a)$ improvEmEnt Seems sUFFicientlY desirable to elect the latTEr alterNatIve, i.e., ApplYing the reNorMalizaTioN ConstaNts in TAble \[zAtAb\] eNSEmble BY EnSemBlE and thus inTROduCing a SlIght Mass depEndence into the renoRMalIzation scheme.

a waY of eSTImAtiNG tHE syStEMatIC Uncertainty in thE renormaliZaTIoN of $\Delta s$ rESulTiNg from tHe residUal brEAking of Chiral symMetry due tO tHe abOVE soUrces lies iN the mismAtch betweEN the aXIaL vectOr aNd the vEcTor RenorMalizaTIon FactoRs, $Z_A /Z_{\cAl a} $ vs. $Z_V /Z_{\Cal V} $, wHiCh would rEmain equal if chiral symmeTry werE striCtlY maintainEd [@rBC3]. In The
$, due to residual sources  of chiral  symm etr y b re akin g. O ne of these so u rces  is the finite extentof th ef ifth di mensi on in t h ed o mai nwa llfe r mi on co nst ruction . At finit e $ m_ {res} $, the re normalizat ion  constant of  th e part ia lly conse rve d cur rent,$ Z^{88} _{\cal A}  $ ,  can d e viate f r o mtheunit value it wou l dt ake if chiralsymmet ry we r e  st ric tly observ ed  [@rb c 2]. Sec o nd l y ,  no t e that, at fi nite lattic e  sp acing$a $,t here i s a c er t ain  tension be twee n adoptin g a ma s s-indep e ndent l attice  re nor mali z at io n s ch e mea nd  ma i nta ining $O (a )$  impr ovem e n t [@lu esc her] . The  renormalizat ion  con s tan t $Z^ {88}_ {A}$in ge neralconta in s dependences o f or der $O(m_ q a )$ , e vi denti n thesli ght  variat ion dis p lay ed i n  T able \[zatab\]. Si nc e th e lattic e data ne ce s sary tope rfo rm t h e  cont inuu m  l imit $a\ righta r ro w0$ areno t avai la ble , t wo op t ions  remai n: One o ption would be to ex t rapolate $Z^{ 8 8} _ { A} /Z^{ 88} _{\cal A} $  tot he c hira l  l imi t , thu s obt ai n in g  a mass-independent  r enorma lizat ion scheme in  more dire c t correspo nden c et o the $\overli ne{MS } $ scheme ,  but spo iling  $O(a)$improveme n t . On the  ot her  ha nd, b yretaining the l eadi ng  quarkmas s depen den ce,  i. e.,  a pplying t he finit e- $m _{ q}  $renor m alizatio ncon st ant s inT able \ [zata b\]en se m ble  by ens e mb l e , $O (a )$  imp rov em ent i s ma i nta ined, a t the exp ens e  ofin tr oducing  a slight mas sdependence  i nto  the r e n ormaliza tion scheme at finite $ a $. Themas s dep ende nce, impl yin g a br eak i ng ofchiral  symm et ryi n  addi t i on  to  t he one enc o d edin th eresi dual ma ss $m_{res} $, ist hen  expected tobeof o r d er  $O ( m_ q  a^ 2) $.S i nce the present  investiga ti o nyielded la t tic edata at  only a  sing l e latti ce spacin g $a$, pr ec ludi n g  adirect est imate of  the effe c ts of fi nitelat tice s pa cin g, ma intain i ng$O(a) $ impr ov ementseems  s ufficien tly desirable to electthe la tteralt ernative,  i. e .,applyingtherenormaliz ati onconst ant s  in T able \[ zat a b\] e nsem b le by ens e mb lea n dthus introd u c i nga sli ght mass d epen dence into the re n ormalization s chem e . 

A  wa y  ofes timating the s yst em a t ic uncer ta inty in the  renorma li z ation  of $\ Deltas$ resu l t in g  fromtheres idual bre aki ng of chir al  s y mmetry  due  t o theaboves ourc e s  lies in the mis match b etwee n  th e axi al  vector andthe vector  renormaliz ationfact ors,$Z_A /Z _{ \cal A } $  v s. $Z_V /Z _ {\cal V}$, wh ich wou ld  rem ain  equal  ifc h iralsymm et rywere stri c t ly ma in t ain ed [ @rbc3 ].  Inthe
$, due_to residual_sources of chiral symmetry_breaking. One_of_these sources_is_the finite extent_of the fifth_dimension in the domain_wall fermion construction._At_finite $m_{res} $, the renormalization constant of the partially conserved current, $Z^{88}_{\cal A} $,_can_deviate from_the_unit_value it would take if_chiral symmetry were strictly observed_[@rbc2]. Secondly,_note that, at finite lattice spacing $a$, there_is_a certain tension_between adopting a mass-independent lattice renormalization scheme and maintaining_$O(a)$ improvement [@luescher]. The renormalization constant_$Z^{88}_{A} $ in_general_contains_dependences of order $O(m_q_a)$, evident in the slight variation_displayed in Table \[zatab\]. Since the lattice_data necessary to perform the continuum limit_$a\rightarrow 0$ are not available, two_options remain: One option would_be to_extrapolate $Z^{88}_{A} /Z^{88}_{\cal A} $_to the chiral_limit, thus_obtaining a mass-independent_renormalization scheme in more direct correspondence_to the $\overline{MS}_$ scheme, but spoiling $O(a)$ improvement._On_the other hand,_by_retaining_the leading_quark mass dependence,_i.e.,_applying the_finite-$m_{q}_$ renormalization constants in Table \[zatab\] ensemble_by_ensemble, $O(a)$ improvement is maintained, at the_expense of introducing a_slight_mass dependence into the_renormalization scheme at finite $a$._The mass dependence, implying a breaking_of chiral_symmetry in_addition to the one encoded in the residual mass $m_{res} $,_is then expected to be of_order $O(m_q a^2 )$._Since the_present_investigation yielded lattice_data_at only_a single lattice spacing $a$, precluding a_direct estimate_of the effects of finite lattice_spacing, maintaining $O(a)$ improvement_seems_sufficiently desirable to elect the latter_alternative, i.e., applying the renormalization constants_in Table \[zatab\] ensemble by ensemble_and_thus_introducing a slight mass dependence_into the renormalization scheme.

A way of_estimating the systematic_uncertainty in the renormalization of $\Delta s$_resulting_from the residual breaking of chiral_symmetry_due to the above sources lies_in_the_mismatch between the axial vector_and the vector renormalization factors, $Z_A_/Z_{\cal A} $ vs. $Z_V /Z_{\cal V} $, which would_remain equal if_chiral symmetry were strictly maintained_[@rbc3]._In_the