 of the model sensitivity to this parameter. The stability of the employed method can be evaluated by testing the stability to a low level change. The results for two other low levels, 132 and 154, are given in Figure \[fig: intensite\_132\_154\]. The two last curves seem to be smoother but this is partly due to the bandwidth parameter which is now equal to 0.045 (always selected by cross validation). For more precision, see Figure \[fig: comp3lambda\] where the three instantaneous intensity curves are plotted together. One can see that there is no significant difference between the three curves and that the method is rather stable.

![Similar to Figure \[fig: intensite\_111\] with a low level of 132 (left) and 154 (right)[]{data-label="fig: intensite_132_154"}](Fig7.jpg "fig:"){width="6.5cm" height="5cm"}![Similar to Figure \[fig: intensite\_111\] with a low level of 132 (left) and 154 (right)[]{data-label="fig: intensite_132_154"}](Fig8.jpg "fig:"){width="6.5cm" height="5cm"}

![Instantaneous intensity (years$^{-1}$) of the storms of level 400 obtained by extrapolation from the low levels 111 (plain line), 132 (dotted line) and 154 (dashed line)[]{data-label="fig: comp3lambda"}](Fig9.jpg){width="8cm" height="6.5cm"}

A model extension
-----------------

In an alternative approach, we consider the gradient of a storm to characterize its strength (instead of the ap index level). Gradients are calculated on one time step (3H) and the storm gradient is defined as the maximal gradient attained during a storm. This approach has been setting up because of the observation of storms with low levels (less than an ap index of 111) but strong effects due to fast variations of the ap index. We have led the same study with this new definition for the storm strength. The extreme gradient level are those greater than 100 and the low one is 35. The estimation of $\beta$ gives $$\hat\beta =  0.0053499\ \textrm{ with the confidence interval } \ [ 0.0038128  ; 0.006887]$$ These values are similar to those obtained with the ap index. The estimated intensity for the storms of extreme gradient is plotted in Figure
of the model sensitivity to this parameter. The stability of the employed method acting can be measure by testing the stability to a depleted grade change. The results for two early low levels, 132 and 154, are given in Figure \[fig: intensite\_132\_154\ ]. The two concluding curves seem to be fluent but this is partly due to the bandwidth argument which is now equal to 0.045 (always selected by cross validation). For more precision, attend Figure \[fig: comp3lambda\ ] where the three instantaneous intensity curves are plotted in concert. One can see that there is no meaning difference between the three curve and that the method is rather stable. 

! [ Similar to Figure \[fig: intensite\_111\ ] with a humble level of 132 (left) and 154 (right)[]{data - label="fig: intensite_132_154"}](Fig7.jpg " fig:"){width="6.5 cm " height="5cm"}![Similar to Figure \[fig: intensite\_111\ ] with a low horizontal surface of 132 (leave) and 154 (right)[]{data - label="fig: intensite_132_154"}](Fig8.jpg " fig:"){width="6.5 cm " height="5 cm " } 

! [ Instantaneous intensity (years$^{-1}$) of the storms of level 400 obtained by extrapolation from the low levels 111 (plain channel), 132 (dotted line) and 154 (crash line)[]{data - label="fig: comp3lambda"}](Fig9.jpg){width="8 curium " height="6.5 cm " } 

 A model extension 
 ----------------- 

 In an alternate approach, we see the gradient of a storm to characterize its strength (alternatively of the ap index level). Gradients are calculated on one time step (3H) and the storm gradient is defined as the maximal gradient attained during a storm. This approach has been setting up because of the observation of storm with low level (less than an ap index of 111) but strong effects due to fast variations of the ap index. We have head the same study with this new definition for the storm forte. The extreme gradient level are those greater than 100 and the low one is 35. The estimation of $ \beta$ give $ $ \hat\beta =   0.0053499\ \textrm { with the confidence time interval } \ [ 0.0038128  ; 0.006887]$$ These values are similar to those obtained with the ap index. The estimated volume for the storms of extreme gradient is plot in Figure
 of the model sensitivity tu this parametet. Rhe stebility of the dmployed method can be evalueted by ttfting the stabilith to a loa level xhanje. The results for two obker lka lereos, 132 and 154, are glven in Figgre \[fig: intenshtd\_132\_154\]. Che two last curves seem to be smootrer but tjis is partly que uo ehe gandwidth parameter which is now esual to 0.045 (always selevted by cross validation). Flr mlre precision, see Vigure \[fig: xomp3jqmbda\] where ghe three pustantaneoua intensity curves are plotted gogetker. One can swe hvat there iw no fignificant differenwe betwren the three gurvev abd that the method is rather stable.

![Simijar to Ficuxe \[fig: intensite\_111\] with a low neven of 132 (lewt) znv 154 (dight)[]{dwta-mabel="fig: ihtensite_132_154"}](Fig7.hpg "fig:"){width="6.5cm" heignt="5sn"}![Similar to Fjgure \[sid: intensite\_111\] with a low level of 132 (left) atd 154 (right)[]{data-label="fig: intebsite_132_154"}](Fig8.jpg "fig:"){width="6.5cl" height="5ci"}

![Instantaneous intensity (years$^{-1}$) of the storms of lavel 400 ubtclked ct fxtrapolation from the low levels 111 (plain line), 132 (dptned line) and 154 (dasmed line)[]{data-label="fog: cpip3lambda"}](Fig9.jpe){width="8ej" geight="6.5cm"}

A model exhension
-----------------

Yn an alternatyve spproach, we consider the grqdient of a frorm to characterive its strenyth (inxtead of the ap index level). Yradiehts are calfulated oh one time step (3H) anc dhe storm gradient is defiged as thx maxnmal graaienj attaiged during a storm. This approach hws begn setding up befause of the observation of stocks with low keeelv (less tkan an ap index of 111) but strong efyects duz to fxst variatpons of tie ap index. Re have led tvg same study xith this new defunition wor the storm xtrength. Nht extreme tradient level are thuae greater than 100 abd the low one os 35. Thq vstmmatijt of $\beta$ giees $$\fat\crta =  0.0053499\ \textrm{ wibh ghe vonfidence interval } \ [ 0.0038128  ; 0.006887]$$ These values arr fimilar jo those jbtained with the ap index. The tstimaved invensitu fjr the storms of extreme gradisnt is pllttcd in Figure
of the model sensitivity to this parameter. of employed method be evaluated by low change. The results two other low 132 and 154, are given in \[fig: intensite\_132\_154\]. The two last curves seem to be smoother but this is due to the bandwidth parameter which is now equal to 0.045 (always selected cross For precision, Figure \[fig: comp3lambda\] where the three instantaneous intensity curves are plotted together. One can see that is no significant difference between the three curves that the method is stable. ![Similar to Figure \[fig: with low level 132 and (right)[]{data-label="fig: intensite_132_154"}](Fig7.jpg "fig:"){width="6.5cm" to Figure \[fig: intensite\_111\] with a low level of 132 (left) and 154 (right)[]{data-label="fig: intensite_132_154"}](Fig8.jpg "fig:"){width="6.5cm" height="5cm"} intensity (years$^{-1}$) storms of 400 by from the low (plain line), 132 (dotted line) and comp3lambda"}](Fig9.jpg){width="8cm" height="6.5cm"} A model extension ----------------- In an approach, we the gradient of a storm to its strength (instead of the ap index level). are calculated on one time step (3H) and the storm gradient is defined as the attained during a storm. approach has been up of observation storms with levels (less than an ap index of 111) but strong effects to fast variations of the ap index. We have led study this new definition the storm strength. The gradient are those greater than the one estimation $\beta$ $$\hat\beta = 0.0053499\ \textrm{ the confidence interval } \ 0.0038128 ; 0.006887]$$ These obtained with the ap index. The estimated intensity the storms of extreme gradient is plotted Figure
 of the model sensitivity to thIs parameteR. The sTabIliTy Of thE empLoyed method can BE evaLuated by testing the stabIlity To A Low lEVeL chanGe. The reSUlTS For TwO oTheR lOW lEvels, 132 And 154, Are giveN in Figure \[fIg: iNtEnsite\_132\_154\]. The two LAsT curves seeM to Be smoother buT thIs is paRtLy dUE to thE baNdwidTh paraMEter whIch is now eQuAL to 0.045 (alwAYs selecTED bY croSs validation). For moRE pREcision, see FiguRe \[fig: cOmP3LaMBDa\] wHerE the three iNsTantaNEous intENsITY CurVEs are plotted tOgether. One cAN seE that tHeRe iS No signIficaNt DIffErence betweEn thE three curVes and THat the mEThod is rAther sTabLe.

![SImilAR tO FIguRe \[FIg: iNTeNsiTE\_111\] wiTh a low leVeL oF 132 (left) And 154 (rIGHT)[]{Data-LabEl="fiG: inteNsite_132_154"}](Fig7.jpg "fiG:"){wiDth="6.5cM" HeiGht="5cm"}![similAr to fiGure \[fIg: inteNsite\_111\] WiTh a low level of 132 (leFt) anD 154 (right)[]{datA-laBeL="fiG: iNtensITe_132_154"}](Fig8.jPg "fIg:"){wIdth="6.5cm" hEight="5cm"}

![iNstAnTANEoUs intensity (years$^{-1}$) of ThE SToRms of levEl 400 obtaINeD bY ExtrapolAtIon From THE low lEvelS 111 (PlAin line), 132 (dOtted lINe) AnD 154 (dashed LiNe)[]{data-LaBel="Fig: Comp3lAMbda"}](fig9.jpg){Width="8cm" hEight="6.5CM"}

A model extensiON
-----------------

In an alternatIVe APPrOAch, wE coNsider the grAdieNT of a StorM To ChaRActerIze itS sTReNGth (instead of the ap inDeX level). gradiEnts are calculAted on one tIME Step (3H) and The sTOrM Gradient is defiNed as The maximal GRadient aTtainEd during A storm. ThiS APproach hAs bEen SetTinG UP bEcause of the obSERvatIoN of storMs wIth low lEveLs (lEss ThaN aN ap index oF 111) but stroNg EfFeCtS duE to faST variatiOnS of ThE ap Index. wE have lEd the Same StUdY WitH this neW DeFINitiOn FoR the StoRm StrenGth. THE exTreme grAdient levEl aRE thoSe GrEater thAn 100 and the low onE iS 35. The estimaTiOn oF $\beta$ gIVEs $$\hat\betA =  0.0053499\ \textrm{ with the confidencE IntervaL } \ [ 0.0038128  ; 0.006887]$$ ThEse vaLues Are similaR to Those oBtaINed witH the ap Index. thE esTIMated INTeNsiTy For the storMS Of eXtremE gRadiEnt is plOtted in Figure
 of the model sensitivityto this pa ramet er.  Th estab ilit y of the emplo y ed m ethod can be evaluated  by t es t ingt he  stab ility t o  a l owle ve l c ha n ge . The  re sults f or two oth erlo w levels, 13 2  a nd 154, ar e g iven in Figu re\[fig:  i nte n site\ _13 2\_15 4\]. T h e twolast curv es seem t o  be smo o t he r bu t this is partlyd ue to the bandwid th par am e te r whi chis now equ al  to 0 . 045 (al w ay s s ele c ted by crossvalidation) .  Fo r more  p rec i sion,see F ig u re\[fig: comp 3lam bda\] whe re the three i n stantan eous i nte nsi ty c u rv es  ar ep lot t ed  to g eth er. Oneca nsee t hatt h e r e is  no  sig nific ant differenc e b etwe e n t he th ree c urve sand t hat th e met ho d is rather sta ble. 

![Simil arto  Fi gu re \[ f ig: in ten sit e\_111\ ] witha  lo wl e v el  of 132 (left) and  1 5 4  ( right)[] {data- l ab el = "fig: in te nsi te_1 3 2 _154" }](F i g7 .jpg "fi g:"){w i dt h= "6.5cm"  h eight= "5 cm" }![ Simil a r to  Figur e \[fig:  inte n site\_111\] wi t h a low level of 1 32 (lef t)and 154 (ri ght) [ ]{da ta-l a be l=" f ig: i ntens it e _1 3 2_154"}](Fig8.jpg " fi g:"){w idth= "6.5cm" heigh t="5cm"}
! [ I nstantan eous in t ensity (years$ ^{-1} $) of thes torms of  leve l 400 ob tained by e xtrapola tio n f rom  th e lo w levels 111( p lain  l ine), 1 32(dotted  li ne)  an d 1 54  (dashedline)[]{ da ta -l ab el= "fig: comp3lam bd a"} ]( Fig 9.jpg ) {width ="8cm " he ig ht = "6. 5cm"}
A  m o d el e xt en sion 
-- -- ----- ---- - --- 

In an  alternat ive appr oa ch , we co nsider the gr ad ient of ast orm  to ch a r acterize  its strength (insteado f the a p i ndexleve l). Gradi ent s arecal c ulated  on on e tim este p (3H)a n dthe  s torm gradi e n t i s def in ed a s the m aximal gradient at t ain ed during a s tor m. T h i sapp r oa c h h as bee n setting up beca use of the  o b se rvation of sto rm s withlow lev els ( l ess tha n an ap i ndex of 1 11 ) bu t str ong effect s due to  fast var i ation s  o f the  ap  index .Wehaveled th e  sa me st udy wi th  thisnew d ef initionfor the storm strength.  The e xtrem e g radient l eve l  ar e those g reat er than 10 0 a ndthe l owo ne is  35. Th e e s timat iono f $\beta$ gi ves $ $\ hat\beta =0 . 005 3499\  \t e xtrm{with  the confidence i n terval } \ [ 0 .003 8 1 28 ;0 .006 88 7]$$ These val ues  a r e  similar  t o those obt ained wi th the a p inde x. The  estima t e di ntensi ty f orthe storm s o fe xtremegr ad i ent is  plo tt ed inFigure 
 of_the model_sensitivity to this parameter._The stability_of_the employed_method_can be evaluated_by testing the_stability to a low_level change. The_results_for two other low levels, 132 and 154, are given in Figure \[fig: intensite\_132\_154\]._The_two last_curves_seem_to be smoother but this_is partly due to the_bandwidth parameter_which is now equal to 0.045 (always selected_by_cross validation). For_more precision, see Figure \[fig: comp3lambda\] where the three_instantaneous intensity curves are plotted together._One can see_that_there_is no significant difference_between the three curves and that_the method is rather stable.

![Similar to_Figure \[fig: intensite\_111\] with a low level_of 132 (left) and 154 (right)[]{data-label="fig:_intensite_132_154"}](Fig7.jpg "fig:"){width="6.5cm" height="5cm"}![Similar to Figure_\[fig: intensite\_111\]_with a low level of_132 (left) and_154 (right)[]{data-label="fig:_intensite_132_154"}](Fig8.jpg "fig:"){width="6.5cm" height="5cm"}

![Instantaneous_intensity (years$^{-1}$) of the storms of_level 400 obtained_by extrapolation from the low levels_111_(plain line), 132_(dotted_line)_and 154_(dashed line)[]{data-label="fig: comp3lambda"}](Fig9.jpg){width="8cm"_height="6.5cm"}

A_model extension
-----------------

In_an_alternative approach, we consider the gradient_of_a storm to characterize its strength (instead_of the ap index_level)._Gradients are calculated on_one time step (3H) and_the storm gradient is defined as_the maximal_gradient attained_during a storm. This approach has been setting up because of_the observation of storms with low_levels (less than an_ap index_of_111) but strong_effects_due to_fast variations of the ap index. We_have led_the same study with this new_definition for the storm_strength._The extreme gradient level are those_greater than 100 and the low_one is 35. The estimation_of_$\beta$_gives $$\hat\beta =  0.0053499\_\textrm{ with the confidence interval }_\ [ 0.0038128_ ; 0.006887]$$ These values are similar_to_those obtained with the ap index._The_estimated intensity for the storms of_extreme_gradient_is plotted in Figure