\approx 410$ MeV, can be obtained in this technique at $\alpha_s^{coul}(\bar c c) = 0.6$. The value $f_{B_c}=385$ MeV, as it is predicted in QCD sum rules [@fbc], gives $\alpha_s^{coul}(\bar b 
c) = 0.45$. We present the results of the Coulomb enhancement for the form factors in Table \[form\].

(140,100) (0,-120)[ ]{} (0,60)[$F_{0}^A(0)$, GeV]{} (30,10)[$n_{bc}$]{} (80,10)[$m_{cc}$]{}

(140,100) (0,-120)[ ]{} (0,60)[$F_{0}^A(0)$, GeV]{} (30,10)[$n_{bc}$]{} (80,10)[$m_{cc}$]{}

The result after the introduction of the Coulomb correction is shown in Fig. \[f3mom\]. Such large corrections to the form factors should not lead to a confusion, as they are resulted from the fare account of the Coulomb corrections both for bare quark loop diagram and meson coupling constant.

In the scheme of the Borel transformation we find a strong dependence on the thresholds of continuum contribution. We think that this dependence reflects the influence of contributions coming from the excited states. So, the choice of $k_{th}$ values in the same region as in the scheme of spectral density moments results in the form factors, which are approximately 50% greater than the predictions in the moments scheme, where the higher excitations numerically are not essential. In this case we can explore the ideology of finite energy sum rules [@fesr], wherein the choice of interval for the quark-hadron duality, expressed by means of sum rules, allows one to isolate the contribution of basic states only. So, if we put $$\begin{aligned}
k_{th}(\bar b c) & = & 1.2\; {\rm GeV},\nonumber \\
k_{th}(\bar c c) & = & 0.9\; {\rm GeV}, \end{aligned}$$ then the region of the lowest bound states is taken into account in both channels of initial and final states, and the Borel transform scheme leads to the results, which are very close to those of moment scheme. The dependence of calculated values on the Borel parameters is presented in Figs. \[f4bor\] and \[f5bor\], in the bare and Coulomb approximations, respectively.
\approx 410 $ MeV, can be obtained in this technique at $ \alpha_s^{coul}(\bar c c) = 0.6$. The value $ f_{B_c}=385 $ MeV, as it is predict in QCD kernel rules [ @fbc ], gives $ \alpha_s^{coul}(\bar b 
 c) = 0.45$. We stage the results of the Coulomb enhancement for the form agent in Table \[form\ ]. 

 (140,100) (0,-120) [ ] { } (0,60)[$F_{0}^A(0)$, GeV ] { } (30,10)[$n_{bc}$ ] { } (80,10)[$m_{cc}$ ] { } 

 (140,100) (0,-120) [ ] { } (0,60)[$F_{0}^A(0)$, GeV ] { } (30,10)[$n_{bc}$ ] { } (80,10)[$m_{cc}$ ] { } 

 The solution after the introduction of the Coulomb correction is shown in Fig. \[f3mom\ ]. Such large correction to the form factors should not head to a confusion, as they are resulted from the fare account of the Coulomb corrections both for bare quark loop diagram and meson coupling changeless. 

 In the scheme of the Borel transformation we find a strong addiction on the thresholds of continuum contribution. We think that this addiction reflects the influence of contribution coming from the excited states. So, the choice of $ k_{th}$ value in the same region as in the scheme of spectral density consequence resultant role in the form factors, which are approximately 50% greater than the predictions in the moments scheme, where the higher excitations numerically are not all-important. In this case we can explore the political orientation of finite department of energy sum rules [ @fesr ], wherein the choice of interval for the quark - hadron dichotomy, expressed by mean of sum rules, allows one to sequester the contribution of basic states only. So, if we put $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 k_{th}(\bar b c) & = & 1.2\; { \rm GeV},\nonumber \\ 
 k_{th}(\bar c c) & = & 0.9\; { \rm GeV }, \end{aligned}$$ then the region of the lowest bounce states is taken into account in both channels of initial and final states, and the Borel transform dodge leads to the results, which are very close to those of moment scheme. The addiction of calculated values on the Borel parameters is presented in Figs. \[f4bor\ ] and \[f5bor\ ], in the bare and Coulomb approximations, respectively.
\appgox 410$ MeV, can be obtained in this technique at $\elpha_s^{ckul}(\bar c c) = 0.6$. The value $f_{B_c}=385$ MeV, as it iw preeicted in QCD sum ruler [@fbc], givvs $\alpha_s^{xoul}(\uar b 
c) = 0.45$. We present the resulfd of vhe Coulomb enhsncement fmr the form fawturd in Table \[form\].

(140,100) (0,-120)[ ]{} (0,60)[$F_{0}^A(0)$, GeV]{} (30,10)[$n_{bc}$]{} (80,10)[$m_{cc}$]{}

(140,100) (0,-120)[ ]{} (0,60)[$S_{0}^A(0)$, GeV]{} (30,10)[$m_{bf}$]{} (80,10)[$m_{cc}$]{}

The resulj afttr ehe jntroduction of the Coulomb correcfion is shown in Fig. \[f3mom\]. Such large correctiojs tl the form factors should not leaq to a confuskon, as thej are resuljed from the fare account of the Coulpmb correcjnins toth for bace quagk loop diagram and mason coipling constanb.

In tie sxheme of the Borel trensformation we find a strong dzpendence on the threwhilds mf cmntivyum cohtcibhtion. Ae vhink that fhis dependwnce reflects the imfjlrnce of contdibutijnf coming from the excited states. So, the chkice of $k_{th}$ values in tye same region as in jhe scheme of spectral density moments results in the form xactocs, whngm ard aoproximately 50% greater than the predictions in fht mpments scheme, chere the higher edcojations numerizally cde not essential. In hhis cafe we can expljre yhe ideology of finite enerty sum rules [@desr], wherein the ckoice of intzrval gor tne quark-hadron duality, zxpresaed by meand of sum djles, allows one go psoldte the contribution of bafic statew onky. So, iw we put $$\bqgin{alignef}
k_{th}(\bar b c) & = & 1.2\; {\rm GeV},\nojumbet \\
k_{th}(\bdr c c) & = & 0.9\; {\rm GeV}, \end{aligned}$$ then the regmpn of the loeevt tound stctes ix taken into wccount in botk channejs of initial ahd finan states, anq the Borel tswnsform scheke leads to rhe eesults, dhich are very close to those of noment scheme. The vepevsence of calculcued values on the Nordl [agamxters hs presented in Wigr. \[f4bor\] and \[f5bor\], ik tfe bsre and Coulomb apprmximztions, respectivelu.
\approx 410$ MeV, can be obtained in at c c) 0.6$. The value predicted QCD sum rules gives $\alpha_s^{coul}(\bar b = 0.45$. We present the results the Coulomb enhancement for the form factors in Table \[form\]. (140,100) (0,-120)[ ]{} GeV]{} (30,10)[$n_{bc}$]{} (80,10)[$m_{cc}$]{} (140,100) (0,-120)[ ]{} (0,60)[$F_{0}^A(0)$, GeV]{} (30,10)[$n_{bc}$]{} (80,10)[$m_{cc}$]{} The result after introduction the correction shown in Fig. \[f3mom\]. Such large corrections to the form factors should not lead to a as they are resulted from the fare account the Coulomb corrections both bare quark loop diagram and coupling In the of Borel we find a dependence on the thresholds of continuum contribution. We think that this dependence reflects the influence of contributions from the So, the of values the same region the scheme of spectral density moments form factors, which are approximately 50% greater than predictions in moments scheme, where the higher excitations are not essential. In this case we can the ideology of finite energy sum rules [@fesr], wherein the choice of interval for the expressed by means of rules, allows one isolate contribution basic only. So, we put $$\begin{aligned} k_{th}(\bar b c) & = & 1.2\; {\rm \\ k_{th}(\bar c c) & = & 0.9\; {\rm GeV}, the of the lowest states is taken into in channels of initial and and Borel to results, are very close to of moment scheme. The dependence calculated values on the Figs. \[f4bor\] and \[f5bor\], in the bare and approximations, respectively.
\approx 410$ MeV, can be obtained in tHis techniqUe at $\aLphA_s^{cOuL}(\bar C c) = 0.6$. ThE value $f_{B_c}=385$ MeV, as IT is pRedicted in QCD sum rules [@fBc], givEs $\ALpha_S^{CoUl}(\bar B 
c) = 0.45$. We preSEnT THe rEsUlTs oF tHE COulomB enHancemeNt for the foRm fAcTors in Table \[fORm\].

(140,100) (0,-120)[ ]{} (0,60)[$f_{0}^A(0)$, GeV]{} (30,10)[$n_{bc}$]{} (80,10)[$m_{cC}$]{}

(140,100) (0,-120)[ ]{} (0,60)[$F_{0}^A(0)$, geV]{} (30,10)[$n_{bc}$]{} (80,10)[$m_{cc}$]{}

The ResUlt aftEr The INtrodUctIon of The CouLOmb corRection is ShOWn in FiG. \[F3mom\]. SucH LArGe coRrections to the forM FaCTors should not lEad to a CoNFuSIOn, aS thEy are resulTeD from THe fare aCCoUNT Of tHE Coulomb correCtions both fOR baRe quarK lOop DIagram And meSoN CouPling constaNt.

In The scheme Of the BORel tranSFormatiOn we fiNd a StrOng dEPeNdEncE oN The THrEshOLds Of continUuM cOntriButiON. wE ThinK thAt thIs depEndence reflecTs tHe inFLueNce of ContrIbutIoNs comIng froM the eXcIted states. So, the ChoiCe of $k_{th}$ vaLueS iN thE sAme reGIon as iN thE scHeme of sPectral DEnsItY MOMeNts results in the forM fACToRs, which aRe apprOXiMaTEly 50% greatEr ThaN the PREdictIons IN tHe momentS schemE, WhErE the higHeR excitAtIonS nuMericALly aRe not eSsential. in thiS Case we can exploRE the ideology oF FiNITe ENergY suM rules [@fesr], wHereIN the ChoiCE oF inTErval For thE qUArK-Hadron duality, expresSeD by meaNs of sUm rules, allows One to isolaTE THe contriButiON oF Basic states onlY. So, if We put $$\begin{ALigned}
k_{tH}(\bar b C) & = & 1.2\; {\rm GeV},\noNumber \\
k_{th}(\BAR c c) & = & 0.9\; {\rm GeV}, \End{AliGneD}$$ thEN ThE region of the lOWEst bOuNd stateS is Taken inTo aCcoUnt In bOtH channels Of initiaL aNd FiNaL stAtes, aND the BoreL tRanSfOrm SchemE Leads tO the rEsulTs, WhICh aRe very cLOsE TO thoSe Of MomeNt sChEme. ThE depENdeNce of caLculated vAluES on tHe boRel paraMeters is preseNtEd in Figs. \[f4bOr\] And \[F5bor\], in THE bare and coulomb approximations, reSPectiveLy.
\approx 410$ MeV, can be o btained in  this  te chn iq ue a t $\ alpha_s^{coul} ( \bar  c c) = 0.6$. The valu e $f_ {B _ c}=3 8 5$  MeV,  as iti sp r edi ct ed  in  Q C Dsum r ule s [@fbc ], gives $ \al ph a_s^{coul}(\ b ar  b 
c) = 0 .45 $. We presen t t he res ul tso f the  Co ulomb  enhan c ementfor the f or m  facto r s in Ta b l e\[fo rm\].

(140,100)( 0, - 120)[ ]{} (0,6 0)[$F_ {0 } ^A ( 0 )$,  Ge V]{} (30,1 0) [$n_{ b c}$]{}( 80 , 1 0 )[$ m _{cc}$]{}

(1 40,100) (0, - 120 )[ ]{}  ( 0,6 0 )[$F_{ 0}^A( 0) $ , G eV]{} (30,1 0)[$ n_{bc}$]{ } (80, 1 0)[$m_{ c c}$]{}
The r esu ltafte r  t he  in tr o duc t io n o f  th e Coulom bco rrect ioni s s hown  in  Fig . \[f 3mom\]. Suchlar ge c o rre ction s tothefo rm fa ctorsshoul dnot lead to a c onfu sion, asthe yare  r esult e d from  th e f are acc ount of the  C o u l om b corrections both  f o r  b are quar k loop di ag r am and m es oncoup l i ng co nsta n t. 

In the  schem e  o fthe Bor el  trans fo rma tio n wef inda stro ng depen dence on the thresho l ds of continu u mc o nt r ibut ion . We thinkthat this  dep e nd enc e  refl ectsth e  i n fluence of contribu ti ons co mingfrom the exci ted states . S o, the c hoic e  o f  $k_{th}$ valu es in  the samer egion as  in t he schem e of spec t r al densi tymom ent s r e s ul ts in the for m fact or s, whic h a re appr oxi mat ely  50 %greater t han thepr ed ic ti ons  in t h e moment ssch em e,where the hi gherexci ta ti o nsnumeric a ll y areno tesse nti al . Inthis cas e we ca n explore  th e  ide ol og y of fi nite energy s um  rules [@f es r],  where i n  the cho ice of interval for the quark-h adr on du alit y, expres sed  by me ans of sum  rules , all ow s o n e  to i s o la teth e contribu t i onof ba si c st ates on ly. So, if we put$ $\b egin{aligned} 
k_ {th} ( \ ba r b c) & =  & 1.2 \ ;  {\rm GeV},\non umber \\
k _{ t h} (\bar c c) & =  &  0.9\;{\rm Ge V}, \ e nd{alig ned}$$ th en the re gi on o f the  lowest bo und stat es is tak e n int o  a ccoun t i n both  c han nelsof ini t ial  andfinalst ates,and t he  Borel t ransform scheme leads t o theresul ts,  which ar e v e ryclose tothos e of momen t s che me. T hed epend ence of  ca l culat ed v a lues on t h eBor e l  p arameters i s p res ented  in Figs.\[f4 bor\] and \[f5bor \ ], in the bare  and C oul omb appr ox imations, resp ect iv e l y.
\approx 410$_MeV, can_be obtained in this_technique at_$\alpha_s^{coul}(\bar_c c)_=_0.6$. The value_$f_{B_c}=385$ MeV, as_it is predicted in_QCD sum rules_[@fbc],_gives $\alpha_s^{coul}(\bar b 
c) = 0.45$. We present the results of the Coulomb enhancement_for_the form_factors_in_Table \[form\].

(140,100) (0,-120)[ ]{} (0,60)[$F_{0}^A(0)$,_GeV]{} (30,10)[$n_{bc}$]{} (80,10)[$m_{cc}$]{}

(140,100) (0,-120)[ ]{}_(0,60)[$F_{0}^A(0)$, GeV]{}_(30,10)[$n_{bc}$]{} (80,10)[$m_{cc}$]{}

The result after the introduction of the_Coulomb_correction is shown_in Fig. \[f3mom\]. Such large corrections to the form_factors should not lead to a_confusion, as they_are_resulted_from the fare account_of the Coulomb corrections both for_bare quark loop diagram and meson_coupling constant.

In the scheme of the Borel_transformation we find a strong dependence_on the thresholds of continuum_contribution. We_think that this dependence reflects_the influence of_contributions coming_from the excited_states. So, the choice of $k_{th}$_values in the_same region as in the scheme_of_spectral density moments_results_in_the form_factors, which are_approximately_50% greater_than_the predictions in the moments scheme,_where_the higher excitations numerically are not essential._In this case we_can_explore the ideology of_finite energy sum rules [@fesr],_wherein the choice of interval for_the quark-hadron_duality, expressed_by means of sum rules, allows one to isolate the contribution_of basic states only. So, if_we put $$\begin{aligned}
k_{th}(\bar b_c) &_=_& 1.2\; {\rm_GeV},\nonumber_\\
k_{th}(\bar c_c) & = & 0.9\; {\rm GeV},_\end{aligned}$$ then_the region of the lowest bound_states is taken into_account_in both channels of initial and_final states, and the Borel transform_scheme leads to the results,_which_are_very close to those of_moment scheme. The dependence of calculated_values on the_Borel parameters is presented in Figs. \[f4bor\]_and_\[f5bor\], in the bare and Coulomb_approximations,_respectively.