 is reported in Table \[maserfitparams\_67\]. The sub-synthesized-beam kinematic analysis facilitated by these fits will be discussed in §\[maserkin\] and §\[individualsources\]. For each EGO in our survey within the FWHP of the VLA primary beam at 6.7 GHz (67; 19 targeted EGOs plus 3 serendipitiously observed), Table \[67iweighted\_egos\] lists the properties of associated 6.7 GHz [CH$_3$OH]{} maser group(s) and the angular separation of the 6.7 GHz maser group(s) and 24 [$\mu$m]{} EGO counterpart. Only two EGOs are potentially associated with multiple 6.7 GHz maser groups: G11.92$-$0.61 and G49.42+0.33. The case of G49.42+0.33 is ambiguous: two spatially and kinematically distinct maser spots are detected, separated by [$\sim$]{}9[$^{\prime\prime}$]{} ([$\sim$]{}0.5 pc at 12.3 kpc, see also §\[g4942\]). The western maser spot (G49.416+0.326) is associated with the EGO, but lacks a discrete 24 [$\mu$m]{} counterpart; however, G49.42+0.33 is much more distant than the other EGOs in our sample, so the sensitivity of the MIPSGAL survey corresponds to an intrinsically brighter 24 [$\mu$m]{} upper limit. The eastern maser spot (G49.417+0.324) is associated with a 24 [$\mu$m]{} source, but may not be associated with the EGO.

Table \[67iweighted\_egos\] quantifies the correlation of 6.7 GHz [CH$_3$OH]{} masers and 24 [$\mu$m]{} emission that is visually apparent in Figure \[3color\]. Excluding the ambiguous case of G49.42+0.33, of the 21 remaining EGOs in Table \[67iweighted\_egos\] (18 targeted plus 3 serendipitously observed), 2 do not have 6.7 GHz maser detections (G49.27$-$0.34 and G49.27$-$0.32) and 2 do not have discrete 24 [$\mu$m]{} counterparts (G10.29$-$0.13 and G28.28$-$0.36). Of the
is reported in Table   \[maserfitparams\_67\ ]. The sub - synthesized - beam kinematic analysis facilitated by these fit will be discourse in § \[maserkin\ ] and § \[individualsources\ ]. For each EGO in our survey within the FWHP of the VLA primary beam at 6.7 gigahertz (67; 19 targeted EGOs plus 3 serendipitiously observed), Table   \[67iweighted\_egos\ ] number the properties of associated 6.7 gigahertz [ CH$_3$OH ] { } maser group(s) and the angular interval of the 6.7 GHz maser group(s) and 24 [ $ \mu$m ] { } EGO counterpart. entirely two EGOs are potentially associated with multiple 6.7 gigahertz maser groups: G11.92$-$0.61 and G49.42 + 0.33. The case of G49.42 + 0.33 is ambiguous: two spatially and kinematically distinct maser spots are detected, separated by [ $ \sim$]{}9[$^{\prime\prime}$ ] { } ([ $ \sim$]{}0.5 personal computer at 12.3 kpc, see also § \[g4942\ ]). The western maser point (G49.416 + 0.326) is associated with the EGO, but lacks a discrete 24 [ $ \mu$m ] { } counterpart; however, G49.42 + 0.33 is a lot more distant than the early EGOs in our sample, so the sensitivity of the MIPSGAL survey corresponds to an intrinsically brighter 24 [ $ \mu$m ] { } upper limit. The easterly maser spot (G49.417 + 0.324) is associated with a 24 [ $ \mu$m ] { } source, but may not be associated with the EGO. 

 Table   \[67iweighted\_egos\ ] quantifies the correlation of 6.7 GHz [ CH$_3$OH ] { } masers and 24 [ $ \mu$m ] { } emission that is visually apparent in Figure   \[3color\ ]. Excluding the ambiguous case of G49.42 + 0.33, of the 21 remaining EGOs in Table   \[67iweighted\_egos\ ] (18 targeted plus 3 serendipitously observed), 2 do not have 6.7 gigahertz maser detection (G49.27$-$0.34 and G49.27$-$0.32) and 2 do not have discrete 24 [ $ \mu$m ] { } counterpart (G10.29$-$0.13 and G28.28$-$0.36). Of the
 is reported in Table \[maserfltparams\_67\]. The sub-synthesmzed-beaj kinemagic analysis facilitated by vhesw fitw will be discussed in §\[maserkin\] and §\[induvidnalsources\]. For eedh EGO lu our durvzy within the FWMP of the VNA primary beak xt 6.7 GHz (67; 19 targeted EGOs plus 3 serendi[itiousky observed), Tablg \[67iweibrted\_sgos\] lists the properties of assocjated 6.7 JHz [CH$_3$OH]{} maser broup(s) and the angular sepwratlon of the 6.7 GHz mader group(s) qnd 24 [$\nu$m]{} EGO coungerpart. Only two EGOs zre potentially associated with multnple 6.7 GHz mqswr htoups: G11.92$-$0.61 and J49.42+0.33. The base of G49.42+0.33 is ambiguouv: two slatially and klnemavicaoly distinct maser spmts are detected, sgparated bf [$\aim$]{}9[$^{\prime\prime}$]{} ([$\sim$]{}0.5 px at 12.3 kpc, see qlsu §\[g4942\]). Tie sesterj meser spot (G49.416+0.326) is associared with the EGO, buu lwbls a discrets 24 [$\mu$m]{} cjunterpart; however, G49.42+0.33 is much more distatt fhan the other EGOs in iur sample, so the senditivity jf the MIPSGAL survey corresponds to an intrinsicdlly urkghuev 24 [$\nu$l]{} upper limit. The eastern maser spot (G49.417+0.324) is assjdistvd with a 24 [$\mu$m]{} somrce, but may not br wsxjciated with jhe EGO.

Czbme \[67iweighted\_egos\] quwntifief the correlatyon pf 6.7 GHz [CH$_3$OH]{} masers and 24 [$\mu$n]{} emission tkat is visually apparznt in Figurz \[3color\]. Excliding the ambiguous casz of G49.42+0.33, of the 21 relaining EFUs in Table \[67iweigftec\_ecos\] (18 targeted plus 3 serendypitously obszrved), 2 du noj have 6.7 GHz maser detegdions (G49.27$-$0.34 and G49.27$-$0.32) and 2 do nlt have discgete 24 [$\mu$m]{} counterparts (G10.29$-$0.13 and G28.28$-$0.36). Of the
is reported in Table \[maserfitparams\_67\]. The sub-synthesized-beam facilitated these fits be discussed in EGO our survey within FWHP of the primary beam at 6.7 GHz (67; targeted EGOs plus 3 serendipitiously observed), Table \[67iweighted\_egos\] lists the properties of associated GHz [CH$_3$OH]{} maser group(s) and the angular separation of the 6.7 GHz maser and [$\mu$m]{} counterpart. two EGOs are potentially associated with multiple 6.7 GHz maser groups: G11.92$-$0.61 and G49.42+0.33. The case G49.42+0.33 is ambiguous: two spatially and kinematically distinct spots are detected, separated [$\sim$]{}9[$^{\prime\prime}$]{} ([$\sim$]{}0.5 pc at 12.3 see §\[g4942\]). The maser (G49.416+0.326) associated with the but lacks a discrete 24 [$\mu$m]{} counterpart; however, G49.42+0.33 is much more distant than the other EGOs our sample, sensitivity of MIPSGAL corresponds an intrinsically brighter upper limit. The eastern maser spot with a 24 [$\mu$m]{} source, but may not associated with EGO. Table \[67iweighted\_egos\] quantifies the correlation 6.7 GHz [CH$_3$OH]{} masers and 24 [$\mu$m]{} emission is visually apparent in Figure \[3color\]. Excluding the ambiguous case of G49.42+0.33, of the 21 in Table \[67iweighted\_egos\] (18 plus 3 serendipitously 2 not 6.7 maser detections and G49.27$-$0.32) and 2 do not have discrete 24 [$\mu$m]{} counterparts and G28.28$-$0.36). Of the
 is reported in Table \[maserfitParams\_67\]. The sUb-synTheSizEd-Beam KineMatic analysis fACiliTated by these fits will be DiscuSsED in §\[mASeRkin\] aNd §\[indivIDuALSouRcEs\]. for EaCH EgO in oUr sUrvey wiThin the FWHp of ThE VLA primary bEAm At 6.7 GHz (67; 19 targeTed eGOs plus 3 sereNdiPitiouSlY obSErved), tabLe \[67iweIghted\_EGos\] lisTs the propErTIes of aSSociateD 6.7 ghz [cH$_3$OH]{} Maser group(s) and the ANgULar separation oF the 6.7 GHZ mASeR GRouP(s) aNd 24 [$\mu$m]{} EGO coUnTerpaRT. Only twO eGoS ARe pOTentially assoCiated with mULtiPle 6.7 GHz MaSer GRoups: G11.92$-$0.61 And G49.42+0.33. THe CAse Of G49.42+0.33 is ambiguOus: tWo spatialLy and kINematicALly distInct maSer SpoTs arE DeTeCteD, sEParATeD by [$\SIm$]{}9[$^{\pRime\primE}$]{} ([$\sIm$]{}0.5 Pc at 12.3 kPc, seE ALSO §\[g4942\]). ThE weSterN maseR spot (G49.416+0.326) is assocIatEd wiTH thE EGO, bUt lacKs a dIsCrete 24 [$\Mu$m]{} couNterpArT; however, G49.42+0.33 is much More Distant thAn tHe OthEr eGOs iN Our samPle, So tHe sensiTivity oF The mIpsgaL Survey corresponds tO aN INtRinsicalLy brigHTeR 24 [$\mU$M]{} upper liMiT. ThE easTERn masEr spOT (G49.417+0.324) Is associAted wiTH a 24 [$\Mu$M]{} source, BuT may noT bE asSocIated WIth tHe EGO.

TAble \[67iweiGhted\_EGos\] quantifies tHE correlation oF 6.7 gHZ [ch$_3$Oh]{} MaseRs aNd 24 [$\mu$m]{} emissiOn thAT is vIsuaLLy AppARent iN FiguRe \[3COlOR\]. Excluding the ambiguOuS case oF G49.42+0.33, of tHe 21 remaining EGos in Table \[67iWEIGhted\_egoS\] (18 tarGEtED plus 3 serendipiTouslY observed), 2 dO Not have 6.7 Ghz masEr detectIons (G49.27$-$0.34 and G49.27$-$0.32) AND 2 do not haVe dIscRetE 24 [$\mu$M]{} COuNterparts (G10.29$-$0.13 and g28.28$-$0.36). oF the
 is reported in Table \[ma serfitpara ms\_6 7\] . T he  sub -syn thesized-beamk inem atic analysis facilita ted b yt hese fi ts wi ll be d i sc u s sed  i n§\[ ma s er kin\]  an d §\[in dividualso urc es \]. For each EG O in our s urv ey within th e F WHP of  t heV LA pr ima ry be am at6 .7 GHz  (67; 19ta r getedE GOs plu s 3sere ndipitiously obse r ve d ), Table \[67i weight ed \ _e g o s\]  li sts the pr op ertie s  of ass o ci a t e d 6 . 7 GHz [CH$_3$ OH]{} maser gro up(s)an d t h e angu lar s ep a rat ion of the6.7GHz maser  group ( s) and2 4 [$\mu $m]{}EGO  co unte r pa rt . O nl y  tw o  E GOs are  potenti al ly  asso ciat e d w ithmul tipl e 6.7  GHz maser gr oup s: G 1 1.9 2$-$0 .61 a nd G 49 .42+0 .33. T he ca se  of G49.42+0.33  isambiguous : t wo  sp at ially and ki nem ati cally d istinct mas er s p ot s are detected, se pa r a te d by [$\ sim$]{ } 9[ $^ { \prime\p ri me} $]{} ( [$\si m$]{ } 0. 5 pc at12.3 k p c,  s ee also  § \[g494 2\ ]).  Th e wes t ernmaserspot (G4 9.416 + 0.326) is asso c iated with th e  E G O ,b ut l ack s a discret e 24 [$\m u$m] { }cou n terpa rt; h ow e ve r , G49.42+0.33 is mu ch  moredista nt than the o ther EGOsi n our samp le,s ot he sensitivity  of t he MIPSGAL survey c orres ponds to  an intri n s ically b rig hte r 2 4 [ $ \ mu $m]{} upper l i m it.Th e easte rnmaser s pot  (G 49. 417 +0 .324) isassociat ed  w it ha 2 4 [$\ m u$m]{} s ou rce ,but  mayn ot beassoc iate dwi t h t he EGO. 
T a b le \ [6 7i weig hte d\ _egos \] q u ant ifies t he correl ati o n of  6 .7  GHz [C H$_3$OH]{} ma se rs and 24[$ \mu $m]{}e m ission t hat is visually apparen t  in Fig ure  \[3c olor \]. Exclu din g theamb i guouscase o f G49 .4 2+0 . 3 3, of t he  21  r emaining E G O s i n Tab le  \[6 7iweigh ted\_egos\] (18 ta r get ed plus 3 ser end ipit o u sl y o b se r ved ), 2 d o not have 6.7 GH z maser de te c ti ons (G49.2 7 $-$ 0. 34 andG49.27$ -$0.3 2 ) and 2  do not h ave discr et e 24 [ $\m u$m]{} cou nterpart s (G10.29 $ -$0.1 3  a nd G2 8.2 8$-$0. 36 ).Of th e
 is_reported in_Table \[maserfitparams\_67\]. The sub-synthesized-beam kinematic_analysis facilitated_by_these fits_will_be discussed in_§\[maserkin\] and §\[individualsources\]._For each EGO in_our survey within_the_FWHP of the VLA primary beam at 6.7 GHz (67; 19 targeted EGOs plus_3_serendipitiously observed),_Table \[67iweighted\_egos\]_lists_the properties of associated 6.7_GHz [CH$_3$OH]{} maser group(s) and_the angular_separation of the 6.7 GHz maser group(s) and_24_[$\mu$m]{} EGO counterpart._Only two EGOs are potentially associated with multiple 6.7_GHz maser groups: G11.92$-$0.61 and G49.42+0.33._The case of_G49.42+0.33_is_ambiguous: two spatially and_kinematically distinct maser spots are detected,_separated by [$\sim$]{}9[$^{\prime\prime}$]{} ([$\sim$]{}0.5 pc at_12.3 kpc, see also §\[g4942\]). The western_maser spot (G49.416+0.326) is associated with_the EGO, but lacks a_discrete 24_[$\mu$m]{} counterpart; however, G49.42+0.33 is_much more distant_than the_other EGOs in_our sample, so the sensitivity of_the MIPSGAL survey_corresponds to an intrinsically brighter 24_[$\mu$m]{}_upper limit. The_eastern_maser_spot (G49.417+0.324)_is associated with_a_24 [$\mu$m]{}_source,_but may not be associated with_the_EGO.

Table \[67iweighted\_egos\] quantifies the correlation of 6.7 GHz_[CH$_3$OH]{} masers and 24_[$\mu$m]{}_emission that is visually_apparent in Figure \[3color\]. Excluding the_ambiguous case of G49.42+0.33, of the_21 remaining_EGOs in_Table \[67iweighted\_egos\] (18 targeted plus 3 serendipitously observed), 2 do not have_6.7 GHz maser detections (G49.27$-$0.34 and_G49.27$-$0.32) and 2 do_not have_discrete_24 [$\mu$m]{} counterparts_(G10.29$-$0.13_and G28.28$-$0.36)._Of the