}_{w_{2,1}}$$ where $$\text{integrand}_{w_{2,1}} = WRHS_{2}(s,\sqrt{q^{2}(s-t)^{2}+r^{2}+2 r q(s-t) \cos(\theta)})\left(1-\frac{2q^{2}(s-t)^{2} \sin^{2}(\theta)}{r^{2}+q^{2}(s-t)^{2} + 2 r q (s-t) \cos(\theta)}\right)$$ Then, we can differentiate under the integral sign. The resulting integrals can be estimated with the same procedure used to estimate analogous integrals arising in the expressions for $\partial_{r}w_{2}$ and $w_{2}$. We get $$|\partial_{t}w_{2}(t,r)| \leq \frac{C \lambda(t)^{2} \log(t)}{t^{2} \log^{b}(t) g(t)}, \quad r >0$$ The same procedure is used to estimate $\partial_{tr}w_{2}$, and this concludes the proof of the lemma

Summation of the higher corrections, $w_{k}$
--------------------------------------------

The nonlinear interactions between $w_{2}$ and $v_{c}$ can not be treated perturbatively in our final argument. Therefore, we will need to define corrections $w_{k}$, in a similar manner as the corrections $v_{k}$ were defined, and sum a series of the form $\sum_{k=3}^{\infty} w_{k}$. Because the estimates for $w_{j}$ and $w_{2}$ will be of a slightly different form, we will first (define and) estimate $w_{3}$, then prove estimates on $w_{j}$ for $j \geq 4$ by induction. We let $$WRHS_{3}(t,r) = \frac{6\left(Q_{\frac{1}{\lambda(t)}}+v_{c}\right)}{r^{2}} w_{2}^{2}+\frac{2 w_{2}^{3}}{r^{2}} + \frac{6 w_{2}}{r^{2}}\left(v_{c}^{2}+2v_{c}Q_{\frac{1}{\lambda(t)}}\right)$$ Then, $$|WRHS_{3}(t,r)| \leq C \begin{cases} \frac{r^{2} \lambda(
} _ { w_{2,1}}$$ where $ $ \text{integrand}_{w_{2,1 } } = WRHS_{2}(s,\sqrt{q^{2}(s - t)^{2}+r^{2}+2 r q(s - t) \cos(\theta)})\left(1-\frac{2q^{2}(s - t)^{2 } \sin^{2}(\theta)}{r^{2}+q^{2}(s - t)^{2 } + 2 r q (s - t) \cos(\theta)}\right)$$ Then, we can differentiate under the integral sign of the zodiac. The result integrals can be estimated with the same routine used to estimate analogous integral arising in the expressions for $ \partial_{r}w_{2}$ and $ w_{2}$. We get $ $ |\partial_{t}w_{2}(t, r)| \leq \frac{C \lambda(t)^{2 } \log(t)}{t^{2 } \log^{b}(t) g(t) }, \quad roentgen > 0$$ The same procedure is use to estimate $ \partial_{tr}w_{2}$, and this concludes the validation of the lemma 

 Summation of the higher corrections, $ w_{k}$ 
 -------------------------------------------- 

 The nonlinear interactions between $ w_{2}$ and $ v_{c}$ cannot be treated perturbatively in our final argument. Therefore, we will necessitate to define corrections $ w_{k}$, in a similar manner as the correction $ v_{k}$ were defined, and sum a series of the form $ \sum_{k=3}^{\infty } w_{k}$. Because the estimate for $ w_{j}$ and $ w_{2}$ will be of a slightly different form, we will first (define and) calculate $ w_{3}$, then prove estimates on $ w_{j}$ for $ j \geq 4 $ by induction. We let $ $ WRHS_{3}(t, r) = \frac{6\left(Q_{\frac{1}{\lambda(t)}}+v_{c}\right)}{r^{2 } } w_{2}^{2}+\frac{2 w_{2}^{3}}{r^{2 } } + \frac{6 w_{2}}{r^{2}}\left(v_{c}^{2}+2v_{c}Q_{\frac{1}{\lambda(t)}}\right)$$ Then, $ $ |WRHS_{3}(t, r)| \leq C \begin{cases } \frac{r^{2 } \lambda (
}_{w_{2,1}}$$ wjere $$\text{integrand}_{w_{2,1}} = WRHR_{2}(s,\sqrt{q^{2}(s-t)^{2}+r^{2}+2 r q(s-j) \xos(\theva)})\left(1-\fdac{2q^{2}(s-t)^{2} \skn^{2}(\theta)}{r^{2}+q^{2}(s-t)^{2} + 2 r q (s-t) \cos(\thete)}\rigyt)$$ Thtu, we can differentiage under nhe integeal wugn. The resulting lutegrzps ccn be estimated eith the sdme procedure gsdd to estimate analogous integrals arysing im hhe expressionf fog $\[artjal_{r}w_{2}$ and $w_{2}$. We get $$|\partial_{t}w_{2}(t,r)| \leq \frac{C \nambda(t)^{2} \log(t)}{t^{2} \log^{b}(t) g(t)}, \quad r >0$$ The same profedure is used to fstimate $\patfiaj_{rr}w_{2}$, and this concludes the proof or the lemma

Summation of the higfer cprrections, $w_{j}$
--------------------------------------------

Thf nonlinear mnterabtions betweek $w_{2}$ and $v_{c}$ can not be treatec pxrtuebatively in our finan argument. Therefote, we will nzed to define correctuobs $w_{k}$, in d sioulaf mznier as thf ckrrections $v_{k}$ were dedined, and sum a seroef of the form $\aum_{k=3}^{\instr} w_{k}$. Because the estimates for $w_{j}$ and $w_{2}$ wiml be of a slightly difderent form, we will flrst (defige and) estimate $w_{3}$, then prove estimates on $w_{j}$ for $b \geq 4$ by ikducguoj. We let $$WRHS_{3}(t,r) = \frac{6\left(Q_{\frac{1}{\lambda(t)}}+v_{c}\right)}{r^{2}} s_{2}^{2}+\ftab{2 w_{2}^{3}}{r^{2}} + \frac{6 w_{2}}{r^{2}}\left(y_{c}^{2}+2v_{c}Q_{\frac{1}{\lambda(t)}}\ribhh)$$ Yren, $$|WRHS_{3}(t,r)| \led C \beyjn{dases} \frac{r^{2} \lambda(
}_{w_{2,1}}$$ where $$\text{integrand}_{w_{2,1}} = WRHS_{2}(s,\sqrt{q^{2}(s-t)^{2}+r^{2}+2 r q(s-t) + r q \cos(\theta)}\right)$$ Then, we sign. resulting integrals can estimated with the procedure used to estimate analogous integrals in the expressions for $\partial_{r}w_{2}$ and $w_{2}$. We get $$|\partial_{t}w_{2}(t,r)| \leq \frac{C \lambda(t)^{2} \log^{b}(t) g(t)}, \quad r >0$$ The same procedure is used to estimate $\partial_{tr}w_{2}$, this the of lemma Summation of the higher corrections, $w_{k}$ -------------------------------------------- The nonlinear interactions between $w_{2}$ and $v_{c}$ can be treated perturbatively in our final argument. Therefore, will need to define $w_{k}$, in a similar manner the $v_{k}$ were and a of the form w_{k}$. Because the estimates for $w_{j}$ and $w_{2}$ will be of a slightly different form, we will (define and) then prove on for \geq 4$ by let $$WRHS_{3}(t,r) = \frac{6\left(Q_{\frac{1}{\lambda(t)}}+v_{c}\right)}{r^{2}} w_{2}^{2}+\frac{2 w_{2}^{3}}{r^{2}} Then, $$|WRHS_{3}(t,r)| \leq C \begin{cases} \frac{r^{2} \lambda(
}_{w_{2,1}}$$ where $$\text{integrand}_{w_{2,1}} = WRHS_{2}(s,\Sqrt{q^{2}(s-t)^{2}+r^{2}+2 r q(S-t) \cos(\TheTa)})\lEfT(1-\fraC{2q^{2}(s-t)^{2} \Sin^{2}(\theta)}{r^{2}+q^{2}(s-t)^{2} + 2 r q (S-T) \cos(\Theta)}\right)$$ Then, we can difFerenTiATe unDEr The inTegral sIGn. tHE reSuLtIng InTEgRals cAn bE estimaTed with the SamE pRocedure used TO eStimate anaLogOus integrals AriSing in ThE exPRessiOns For $\paRtial_{r}W_{2}$ And $w_{2}$. We Get $$|\partiaL_{t}W_{2}(T,r)| \leq \fRAc{C \lambDA(T)^{2} \lOg(t)}{t^{2} \Log^{b}(t) g(t)}, \quad r >0$$ The saME pROcedure is used tO estimAtE $\PaRTIal_{Tr}w_{2}$, And this conClUdes tHE proof oF ThE LEMma

sUmmation of the Higher correCTioNs, $w_{k}$
--------------------------------------------

ThE nOnlINear inTeracTiONs bEtween $w_{2}$ and $v_{C}$ can Not be treaTed perTUrbativELy in our Final aRguMenT. TheREfOrE, we WiLL neED tO deFIne CorrectiOnS $w_{K}$, in a sImilAR MANner As tHe coRrectIons $v_{k}$ were defIneD, and SUm a SerieS of thE forM $\sUm_{k=3}^{\inFty} w_{k}$. BEcausE tHe estimates for $w_{J}$ and $W_{2}$ will be of A slIgHtlY dIfferENt form, We wIll First (deFine and) EStiMaTE $W_{3}$, ThEn prove estimates on $W_{j}$ FOR $j \Geq 4$ by indUction. wE lEt $$wrHS_{3}(t,r) = \fraC{6\lEft(q_{\fraC{1}{\LAmbda(T)}}+v_{c}\rIGhT)}{r^{2}} w_{2}^{2}+\frac{2 w_{2}^{3}}{R^{2}} + \frac{6 w_{2}}{R^{2}}\LeFt(V_{c}^{2}+2v_{c}Q_{\frAc{1}{\Lambda(T)}}\rIghT)$$ ThEn, $$|WRHs_{3}(T,r)| \leQ C \begiN{cases} \frAc{r^{2} \laMBda(
}_{w_{2,1}}$$ where $$\tex t{integran d}_{w _{2 ,1} }= WR HS_{ 2}(s,\sqrt{q^{ 2 }(s- t)^{2}+r^{2}+2 r q(s-t ) \co s( \ thet a )} )\lef t(1-\fr a c{ 2 q ^{2 }( s- t)^ {2 }  \ sin^{ 2}( \theta) }{r^{2}+q^ {2} (s -t)^{2} + 2r  q  (s-t) \co s(\ theta)}\righ t)$ $ Then ,wec an di ffe renti ate un d er the  integral  s i gn. Th e  result i n ginte grals can be esti m at e d with the sam e proc ed u re u sed  to  estimatean alogo u s integ r al s a ris i ng in the exp ressions fo r  $\ partia l_ {r} w _{2}$and $ w_ { 2}$ . We get $$ |\pa rtial_{t} w_{2}( t ,r)| \l e q \frac {C \la mbd a(t )^{2 }  \ lo g(t )} { t^{ 2 }\lo g ^{b }(t) g(t )} ,\quad  r > 0 $ $ Thesam e pr ocedu re is used to  es tima t e $ \part ial_{ tr}w _{ 2}$,and th is co nc ludes the proof  ofthe lemma 

S um mat io n oft he hig her  co rrectio ns, $w_ { k}$ 
- - - - -- ------------------ -- - - -- -------- ------ 
T he nonlinea rint erac t i ons b etwe e n$w_{2}$and $v _ {c }$  can no tbe tre at edper turba t ivel y in o ur final  argu m ent. Therefore ,  we will need to d ef i ne c orr ections $w_ {k}$ ,  ina si m il arm anner  as t he co r rections $v_{k}$ we re  defin ed, a nd sum a seri es of thef o r m $\sum_ {k=3 } ^{ \ infty} w_{k}$.  Beca use the es t imates f or $w _{j}$ an d $w_{2}$ w ill be o f a  sl igh tly d if ferent form,w e  wil lfirst ( def ine and ) e sti mat e $ w_ {3}$, the n provees ti ma te s o n $w_ { j}$ for$j  \g eq  4$  by i n ductio n. We  let  $ $W R HS_ {3}(t,r )  = \ frac {6 \l eft( Q_{ \f rac{1 }{\l a mbd a(t)}}+ v_{c}\rig ht) } {r^{ 2} }w_{2}^{ 2}+\frac{2 w_ {2 }^{3}}{r^{ 2} } +  \frac { 6  w_{2}}{ r^{2}}\left(v_{c}^{2}+2 v _{c}Q_{ \fr ac{1} {\la mbda(t)}} \ri ght)$$  Th e n, $$| WRHS_{ 3}(t, r) | \ l e q C \ b e gi n{c as es} \frac{ r ^ {2}  \lam bd a(
}_{w_{2,1}}$$ where_$$\text{integrand}_{w_{2,1}} =_WRHS_{2}(s,\sqrt{q^{2}(s-t)^{2}+r^{2}+2 r q(s-t) \cos(\theta)})\left(1-\frac{2q^{2}(s-t)^{2}_\sin^{2}(\theta)}{r^{2}+q^{2}(s-t)^{2} +_2_r q_(s-t)_\cos(\theta)}\right)$$ Then, we_can differentiate under_the integral sign. The_resulting integrals can_be_estimated with the same procedure used to estimate analogous integrals arising in the expressions_for_$\partial_{r}w_{2}$ and_$w_{2}$._We_get $$|\partial_{t}w_{2}(t,r)| \leq \frac{C \lambda(t)^{2}_\log(t)}{t^{2} \log^{b}(t) g(t)}, \quad r_>0$$ The_same procedure is used to estimate $\partial_{tr}w_{2}$, and_this_concludes the proof_of the lemma

Summation of the higher corrections, $w_{k}$
--------------------------------------------

The nonlinear_interactions between $w_{2}$ and $v_{c}$ can_not be treated_perturbatively_in_our final argument. Therefore,_we will need to define corrections_$w_{k}$, in a similar manner as_the corrections $v_{k}$ were defined, and sum_a series of the form $\sum_{k=3}^{\infty}_w_{k}$. Because the estimates for_$w_{j}$ and_$w_{2}$ will be of a_slightly different form,_we will_first (define and)_estimate $w_{3}$, then prove estimates on_$w_{j}$ for $j_\geq 4$ by induction. We let_$$WRHS_{3}(t,r)_= \frac{6\left(Q_{\frac{1}{\lambda(t)}}+v_{c}\right)}{r^{2}} w_{2}^{2}+\frac{2_w_{2}^{3}}{r^{2}}_+_\frac{6 w_{2}}{r^{2}}\left(v_{c}^{2}+2v_{c}Q_{\frac{1}{\lambda(t)}}\right)$$_Then, $$|WRHS_{3}(t,r)| \leq_C_\begin{cases} \frac{r^{2}_\lambda(