 by @jordan04, mass segregation and stellar evolution effects are the leading causes of the blue/red GC size differences. In this scenario little change of relative GC sizes with galactocentric distances is expected.

By comparing the average half-light radii of the red and blue GC in NGC5866 we do not find any significant difference between the two subpopulations. Furthermore, the size versus galactocentric radius comparison, shown in Figure \[reffrad\], reveals a slight tendency of outer GC to have larger half-light radii.

Due to the small number of GCs available, the absence of a clear size difference between the red and blue GCs, and the uncertainties in the half-light radius versus $R_{gc}$ correlation, these observations cannot be used to clearly support either the mass segregation or the projection scenarios.

Comparison with models
----------------------

Figure \[spot\] shows a comparison between the observed colors of NGC5866 GCs and the predictions from R05. Each panel in the figure shows a Simple Stellar Population (SSP) model with a defined \[Fe/H\], and for ages 1 $\leq$ t (Gyr) $\leq$ 14.

At first glance, these panels will give little information about the age and metallicity properties of the observed GCs, due to the strong overlap of models with different physical properties. This is not related to the particular choice of SSP models. In order to reduce model systematics, we have also considered a data to models comparison using the @bc03 SSP models. The new set of models essentially agrees with the R05 one, and the overlap between models at different \[Fe/H\] is still present. Moreover, since the R05 models are optimized to match in detail the observational features of Color Magnitude Diagrams of Galactic and Magellanic Clouds stellar clusters, in this section we will take the set of stellar synthesis models from R05 as reference ones.

If no constraint is put on models, the conclusions that can be drawn from the comparison shown in Figure \[spot\] are mainly: $i$) SSP models, i.e. single age and single metallicity stellar systems, reproduce nicely the observational color-color properties of GCs; $ii$) except one single object, no old super metal-rich (t $>$ 7 Gyr, \[Fe/H\]$>$\[Fe/H\]$_{\sun}$) GC seems to be present; $iii$) the reddest GCs
by @jordan04, mass segregation and stellar evolution effects are the lead campaign of the blue / red GC size differences. In this scenario little variety of relative GC sizes with galactocentric distances is expect. 

 By comparing the average half - unaccented radii of the red and aristocratic GC in NGC5866 we do not find any significant remainder between the two subpopulations. Furthermore, the size versus galactocentric radius comparison, shown in Figure \[reffrad\ ], reveals a slight tendency of out GC to have larger half - light radii. 

 Due to the little number of GCs available, the absence of a clear size difference between the red and gloomy GCs, and the uncertainties in the half - light radius versus $ R_{gc}$ correlation, these observation cannot be used to clearly support either the mass segregation or the projection scenario. 

 Comparison with models 
 ---------------------- 

 Figure \[spot\ ] shows a comparison between the observed colors of NGC5866 GCs and the predictions from R05. Each panel in the figure shows a Simple Stellar Population (SSP) model with a specify \[Fe / H\ ], and for ages 1 $ \leq$ t (Gyr) $ \leq$ 14. 

 At beginning glance, these panel will give little information about the old age and metallicity properties of the observed GCs, due to the strong lap of models with different physical properties. This is not related to the particular choice of SSP models. In order to reduce model systematics, we have also consider a datum to models comparison using the @bc03 SSP models. The new set of models essentially agrees with the R05 one, and the lap between models at unlike \[Fe / H\ ] is still present. Moreover, since the R05 models are optimized to match in contingent the observational features of Color Magnitude Diagrams of Galactic and Magellanic Clouds stellar clusters, in this section we will claim the set of stellar deduction models from R05 as reference ones. 

 If no constraint is put on mannequin, the conclusions that can be drawn from the comparison shown in Figure \[spot\ ] are mainly: $ i$) SSP models, i.e. single age and single metallicity leading systems, reproduce nicely the experimental color - color properties of gigahertz; $ ii$) except one single object, no old super metal - rich (t $ > $ 7 Gyr, \[Fe / H\]$>$\[Fe / H\]$_{\sun}$) GC seems to be present; $ iii$) the reddest GCs
 by @jordan04, mass segregation and stellar evolution effecfs are tfe leading causes of the blux/red GC suze differences. In thir scenaril little chaige of relative JD sizes with fwlaccorentric distancgs is expectad.

By comparing tfe average half-light radii of the red and blie GC in NGC5866 we qo npe fihd any significant difference betwsen the two subpopulstions. Furthermore, the sizf vegsus galactocentrif radius conparywon, shown in Figure \[reffrad\], reveala a slight tendency of outer GC to hcve larger yaof-llcht radii.

Dux to tre small numnvr of GWs avaikable, the absekce oh a xlear size difference between the red agd blue GWs, and the uncertaibtues it tha haud-lieht redihs verdus $R_{gc}$ corremation, thesw observations cannpt ve used to clsarly fu[port either the mass segregation or tht pronection scenarios.

Comparuson with models
----------------------

Figurg \[spot\] shors a comparison between the observed colors of NGW5866 GCs xnd tme pfwdlctions from R05. Each panel in the figure shows z Xikple Stellar Pjpulation (SXP) mpqel with a dewined \[Ys/H\], and for ages 1 $\leq$ t (Gyr) $\jeq$ 14.

Ar first gjancr, these panels will give lirtle informanion about the age and metallicitv propgrties of the observed GCs, duz to tge strong ogerlap of oodels with diffdrekt [hysical properties. This if not releted co the pxrtivular shoice of DSP models. In order to rfduce mmdel systelatics, we have also considered e data to modgls cokparison usinn the @bc03 SSP moqels. The new sgt of modzls esrentially zgrees xith the R05 oge, and the ovatlap between kodels ae didferwnt \[Fe/H\] ks still presemt. Moreovvr, sinxe the R05 models arc optkjized to match nu eetail the obsetvagiogap heatuwas of Color Kagnktuar Diaerams of Gaoxctiv and Magellanic Clogds atellar clusters, im bhis sectuon we wyll take the xet of stellar synuhesis movels ftom R05 as reference ones.

If no consfraint is pub on models, tre cinclusions tkat can be drawn from the comparison shoxn in Figure \[spot\] are mqinly: $i$) SSP models, n.e. single age and fingle medallicity stellar sywtems, reproduce nlcely the observationam colos-colog properties of GCs; $ii$) except one single object, no old super metal-rich (t $>$ 7 Gyr, \[He/R\]$>$\[Fe/H\]$_{\sun}$) GC aeemx to te 'resent; $iii$) vhe reddest GCs
by @jordan04, mass segregation and stellar evolution the causes of blue/red GC size change relative GC sizes galactocentric distances is By comparing the average half-light radii the red and blue GC in NGC5866 we do not find any significant between the two subpopulations. Furthermore, the size versus galactocentric radius comparison, shown in \[reffrad\], a tendency outer GC to have larger half-light radii. Due to the small number of GCs available, the of a clear size difference between the red blue GCs, and the in the half-light radius versus correlation, observations cannot used clearly either the mass or the projection scenarios. Comparison with models ---------------------- Figure \[spot\] shows a comparison between the observed colors NGC5866 GCs predictions from Each in figure shows a Population (SSP) model with a defined ages 1 $\leq$ t (Gyr) $\leq$ 14. At glance, these will give little information about the and metallicity properties of the observed GCs, due the strong overlap of models with different physical properties. This is not related to the of SSP models. In to reduce model we also a to models using the @bc03 SSP models. The new set of models essentially with the R05 one, and the overlap between models at is present. Moreover, since R05 models are optimized match detail the observational features Magnitude of Clouds clusters, this section we will the set of stellar synthesis from R05 as reference put on models, the conclusions that can be from the comparison shown in Figure \[spot\] mainly: $i$) SSP models, i.e. single age and single metallicity stellar systems, nicely the properties of GCs; $ii$) except one single object, old super metal-rich (t 7 Gyr, \[Fe/H\]$>$\[Fe/H\]$_{\sun}$) GC seems to be present; $iii$) reddest
 by @jordan04, mass segregation anD stellar evOlutiOn eFfeCtS are The lEading causes of THe blUe/red GC size differences. in thiS sCEnarIO lIttle Change oF ReLATivE Gc sIzeS wITh GalacTocEntric dIstances is ExpEcTed.

By compariNG tHe average hAlf-Light radii of The Red and BlUe Gc In NGC5866 We dO not fInd any SIgnifiCant diffeReNCe betwEEn the twO SUbPopuLations. FurthermorE, ThE Size versus galaCtocenTrIC rADIus ComParison, shoWn In FigURe \[reffrAD\], rEVEAls A Slight tendencY of outer GC tO HavE largeR hAlf-LIght raDii.

DuE tO The Small number Of GCS availablE, the abSEnce of a CLear sizE diffeRenCe bEtweEN tHe Red AnD BluE gCS, anD The UncertaiNtIeS in thE halF-LIGHt raDiuS verSus $R_{gC}$ correlation, tHesE obsERvaTions CannoT be uSeD to clEarly sUpporT eIther the mass segRegaTion or the ProJeCtiOn ScenaRIos.

ComParIsoN with moDels
----------------------

FigURe \[sPoT\] SHOwS a comparison betweeN tHE ObServed coLors of ngC5866 gCS And the prEdIctIons FROm R05. EaCh paNEl In the figUre shoWS a siMple SteLlAr PopuLaTioN (SSp) modeL With A definEd \[Fe/H\], and For agES 1 $\leq$ t (Gyr) $\leq$ 14.

At fIRst glance, thesE PaNELs WIll gIve Little inforMatiON aboUt thE AgE anD MetalLicitY pROpERties of the observed Gcs, Due to tHe strOng overlap of mOdels with dIFFErent phySicaL PrOPerties. This is nOt relAted to the pARticular ChoicE of SSP moDels. In ordER To reduce ModEl sYstEmaTICs, We have also conSIDereD a Data to mOdeLs compaRisOn uSinG thE @bC03 SSP modelS. The new sEt Of MoDeLs eSsentIAlly agreEs WitH tHe R05 One, anD The oveRlap bEtweEn MoDEls At diffeREnT \[fE/H\] is StIlL preSenT. MOreovEr, siNCe tHe R05 modeLs are optiMizED to mAtCh In detaiL the observatiOnAl features Of colOr MagnITUde DiagrAms of Galactic and MagellaNIc CloudS stEllar ClusTers, in thiS seCtion wE wiLL take tHe set oF stelLaR syNTHesis MODeLs fRoM R05 as refereNCE onEs.

If nO cOnstRaint is Put on models, the concLUsiOns that can be dRawN froM THe ComPArISon ShOWn iN fIgure \[spot\] are maiNly: $i$) SSP modElS, I.e. Single age aND siNgLe metalLicity sTellaR Systems, Reproduce Nicely the ObServATIonAl color-colOr properTies of GCs; $II$) excePT oNe sinGle Object, No Old Super Metal-rICh (t $>$ 7 gyr, \[Fe/h\]$>$\[Fe/H\]$_{\suN}$) Gc seems To be pReSent; $iii$) tHe reddest GCs
 by @jordan04, mass segreg ation andstell arevo lu tion  eff ects are the l e adin g causes of the blue/r ed GC  s i ze d i ff erenc es. Int hi s sce na ri o l it t le  chan geof rela tive GC si zes  w ith galactoc e nt ric distan ces  is expected .
By com pa rin g  theave ragehalf-l i ght ra dii of th er ed and blue GC i nNGC5 866 we do not fin d  a n y significantdiffer en c eb e twe enthe two su bp opula t ions. F u rt h e r mor e , the size ve rsus galact o cen tric r ad ius compar ison,  s h own  in Figure\[re ffrad\],reveal s  a slig h t tende ncy of  ou ter  GCt oha vela r ger ha lf- l igh t radii. 
Du e tothes m a l l nu mbe r of  GCsavailable, th e a bsen c e o f a c learsize  d iffer ence b etwee nthe red and blu e GC s, and th e u nc ert ai nties in the  ha lf- light r adius v e rsu s$ R _ {g c}$ correlation, t he s e  o bservati ons ca n no tb e used t ocle arly s uppor t ei t he r the ma ss seg r eg at ion orth e proj ec tio n s cenar i os.
Compa rison wi th mo d els
---------- - -----------
F ig u r e\ [spo t\]  shows a co mpar i sonbetw e en  th e  obse rvedco l or s  of NGC5866 GCs and  t he pre dicti ons from R05.  Each pane l i n the fi gure sh o ws a Simple St ellar  Populatio n  (SSP) m odelwith a d efined \[ F e /H\], an d f orage s 1 $ \l eq$ t (Gyr) $ \ l eq$14 .

At f irs t glanc e,the sepan el s will gi ve littl ein fo rm ati on ab o ut the a ge  an dmet allic i ty pro perti es o fth e  ob servedG Cs , dueto  t he s tro ng  over lapo f m odels w ith diffe ren t  phy si ca l prope rties. This i snot relate dtothe pa r t icular c hoice of SSP models. In order t o r educe  mod el system ati cs, we  ha v e also  consi dered  a  da t a  to m o d el s c om parison us i n g t he @b c0 3 SS P model s. The new set ofm ode ls essentiall y a gree s wi tht he R05  o n e,a n d the overlap b etween mod el s  a t differen t  \[ Fe /H\] is  stillprese n t. More over, sin ce the R0 5mode l s  ar e optimize d to mat ch in det a il th e  o bserv ati onal f ea tur es of  Color Mag nitud e Diag ra ms ofGalac ti c and Ma gellanic Clouds stellar  clust ers,inthis sect ion wewill take  the  set of st ell arsynth esi s  mode ls f r om  R0 5  as r efer e nce ones. 
I f n o co nstraint is p u t o n mod els ,  the c oncl usions that can b e  drawn from th e co m p ari son show nin Figure \[sp ot\ ]a r e mainly :$i$) SSP mo dels, i. e. singl e ageand si ngle me t a ll i city s tell arsystems,rep ro d uce nic el yt he obs erva ti onal c olor-c o lorp r operties of GCs;  $ii$ ) excep t  on e sin gl e objec t , no  old super  metal-rich  (t $> $ 7Gyr,\[Fe/H\ ]$ >$\[Fe /H\ ]$ _{\sun}$)G C seems t o bepresent ;$iii $)the re ddes t GCs
 by_@jordan04, mass_segregation and stellar evolution_effects are_the_leading causes_of_the blue/red GC_size differences. In_this scenario little change_of relative GC_sizes_with galactocentric distances is expected.

By comparing the average half-light radii of the red and_blue_GC in_NGC5866_we_do not find any significant_difference between the two subpopulations._Furthermore, the_size versus galactocentric radius comparison, shown in Figure_\[reffrad\],_reveals a slight_tendency of outer GC to have larger half-light radii.

Due_to the small number of GCs_available, the absence_of_a_clear size difference between_the red and blue GCs, and_the uncertainties in the half-light radius_versus $R_{gc}$ correlation, these observations cannot be_used to clearly support either the_mass segregation or the projection_scenarios.

Comparison with_models
----------------------

Figure \[spot\] shows a comparison_between the observed_colors of_NGC5866 GCs and_the predictions from R05. Each panel_in the figure_shows a Simple Stellar Population (SSP)_model_with a defined_\[Fe/H\],_and_for ages_1 $\leq$ t_(Gyr)_$\leq$ 14.

At_first_glance, these panels will give little_information_about the age and metallicity properties of_the observed GCs, due_to_the strong overlap of_models with different physical properties._This is not related to the_particular choice_of SSP_models. In order to reduce model systematics, we have also considered_a data to models comparison using_the @bc03 SSP models._The new_set_of models essentially_agrees_with the_R05 one, and the overlap between models_at different_\[Fe/H\] is still present. Moreover, since_the R05 models are_optimized_to match in detail the observational_features of Color Magnitude Diagrams of_Galactic and Magellanic Clouds stellar_clusters,_in_this section we will take_the set of stellar synthesis models_from R05 as_reference ones.

If no constraint is put on_models,_the conclusions that can be drawn_from_the comparison shown in Figure \[spot\]_are_mainly:_$i$) SSP models, i.e. single_age and single metallicity stellar systems,_reproduce nicely the observational color-color properties of GCs; $ii$)_except one single_object, no old super metal-rich_(t_$>$_7 Gyr, \[Fe/H\]$>$\[Fe/H\]$_{\sun}$) GC seems to be present; $iii$) the_reddest GCs