    M^{tri}_{a_{1}\rightarrow 3\pi} = \frac{1}{f_{\pi}} 
    M(a_{1}\rightarrow \sigma\pi) \,,$$ because $2g_{\sigma\pi\pi}=(m^{2}_{\sigma}-m^{2}_{\pi})/f_{\pi}$ in the linear $\sigma$ model (L$\sigma$M). Thus the sum of (\[eq:two\]) and (\[eq:three\]) vanishes in the soft pion limit [@ivanov; @ivanov1] $$\label{eq:four}
    M_{a_{1}\rightarrow 3\pi}|_{total} =
    M^{box}_{a_{1}\rightarrow 3\pi} +
    M^{tri}_{a_{1}\rightarrow 3\pi} \rightarrow 0 \,,$$ compatible with data [@pdg]: $\Gamma(a_{1}\rightarrow\pi(\pi\pi)_{\mathrm{swave}})=1\pm1$ MeV.

b\) $\gamma\gamma\rightarrow2\pi^{0}|_{s=m^{2}_{\sigma}}$:

Again using pseudoscalar pion-quark couplings, it was predicted [@kaloshin] five years before data appeared that this $\gamma\gamma\rightarrow2\pi^{0}$ cross section should fall to about $10$ nbarns in the $700$ MeV region. Equivalently, using the SPT theorem stemming from Eq. (\[eq:identity\]), we predict the amplitude due to the quark box plus quark triangle graphs of Fig. 2 $$\label{eq:five}
    \langle \pi^{0}\pi^{0}|\gamma\gamma \rangle \rightarrow
    \left[ - \frac{i}{f_{\pi}}\langle\sigma|\gamma\gamma\rangle +
    \frac{i}{f_{\pi}}\langle\sigma|\gamma\gamma\rangle \right] \rightarrow 0 \,,$$ as $s\rightarrow m^2_{\sigma}(700)$ [@ivanov1]. This picture was supported by recent Crystal Ball data [@crystalball].

c\) $\pi^{-}p\rightarrow\pi^{-}\pi^{+}n$:

The SPT stemming from Eq. (\[eq:identity\]) also suggests that the sum of the two $\pi^{+}$ peripheral–dominated $\pi^{-}p\rightarrow\pi^{-}\pi^{+
M^{tri}_{a_{1}\rightarrow 3\pi } = \frac{1}{f_{\pi } } 
     M(a_{1}\rightarrow \sigma\pi) \,,$$ because $ 2g_{\sigma\pi\pi}=(m^{2}_{\sigma}-m^{2}_{\pi})/f_{\pi}$ in the linear $ \sigma$ model (L$\sigma$M). Thus the sum of   (\[eq: two\ ]) and   (\[eq: three\ ]) vanishes in the piano pion terminus ad quem   [ @ivanov; @ivanov1 ] $ $ \label{eq: four } 
     M_{a_{1}\rightarrow 3\pi}|_{total } = 
     M^{box}_{a_{1}\rightarrow 3\pi } + 
     M^{tri}_{a_{1}\rightarrow 3\pi } \rightarrow 0 \,,$$ compatible with data   [ @pdg ]: $ \Gamma(a_{1}\rightarrow\pi(\pi\pi)_{\mathrm{swave}})=1\pm1 $ MeV. 

 b\) $ \gamma\gamma\rightarrow2\pi^{0}|_{s = m^{2}_{\sigma}}$: 

 Again using pseudoscalar pion - quark cheese couplings, it was bode   [ @kaloshin ] five years before data appear that this $ \gamma\gamma\rightarrow2\pi^{0}$ cross section should descend to about $ 10 $ nbarns in the $ 700 $ MeV region. Equivalently, use the SPT theorem stemming from Eq.   (\[eq: identity\ ]), we predict the amplitude due to the quark box plus quark triangulum graphs of Fig.   2 $ $ \label{eq: five } 
     \langle \pi^{0}\pi^{0}|\gamma\gamma \rangle \rightarrow 
     \left [ - \frac{i}{f_{\pi}}\langle\sigma|\gamma\gamma\rangle + 
     \frac{i}{f_{\pi}}\langle\sigma|\gamma\gamma\rangle \right ] \rightarrow 0 \,,$$ as $ s\rightarrow m^2_{\sigma}(700)$   [ @ivanov1 ]. This picture was supported by recent Crystal Ball data   [ @crystalball ]. 

 c\) $ \pi^{-}p\rightarrow\pi^{-}\pi^{+}n$: 

 The SPT stemming from Eq.   (\[eq: identity\ ]) also propose that the sum of the two $ \pi^{+}$ peripheral – dominated $ \pi^{-}p\rightarrow\pi^{-}\pi^{+
    M^{tri}_{a_{1}\rightarrow 3\pi} = \frag{1}{f_{\pi}} 
    M(a_{1}\rightcerow \smgma\pi) \,,$$ because $2g_{\sigma\pi\pi}=(m^{2}_{\sigma}-m^{2}_{\pi})/f_{\pi}$ in tie lunear $\sigma$ model (L$\sigma$M). Tfus the slm of (\[eq:twi\]) anv (\[eq:three\]) vanishes in the soft llon lnmmt [@ivanov; @ivanov1] $$\label{eq:fogr}
    M_{a_{1}\rightasruw 3\pi}|_{total} =
    M^{box}_{a_{1}\rightarrow 3\pi} +
    M^{tri}_{a_{1}\rogjtarrow 3\pi} \rigrtargor 0 \,,$$ dompatible with data [@pdg]: $\Gamma(a_{1}\righfarrow\pp(\pi\pi)_{\mathrm{swave}})=1\pk1$ MeV.

b\) $\gamma\gamma\rightarroa2\pi^{0}|_{s=l^{2}_{\sigma}}$:

Again using oseudoscalat pijb-quark couplkngs, it was predicted [@kzloshin] five years before data xppeaxed that thus $\galka\gamma\righvarrow2\ii^{0}$ cross sectlpn shogld falk to about $10$ nbsrnv ib the $700$ MeV region. Equmvalently, using the FPT theoram stemming from Eq. (\[wq:udenthty\]), fe pfwdizt uhe ajplitufe vue to the suark box pous quark triangle brwins of Fig. 2 $$\lagel{eq:fyvq}
    \langle \pi^{0}\pi^{0}|\gamma\gamma \rangle \rightdrrkw
    \left[ - \frac{i}{f_{\pi}}\lantle\sigma|\gamma\gamma\ranhle +
    \fwac{i}{f_{\pi}}\langle\sigma|\gamma\gamma\rangle \right] \rightarrmw 0 \,,$$ es $s\rnnmtarfiw m^2_{\sigma}(700)$ [@ivanov1]. This picture was supported by rqdemt Crystal Ball bata [@crystalball].

c\) $\pl^{-}p\tyghtarrow\pi^{-}\pi^{+}v$:

The S'F atemming from Eq. (\[eq:ldentiti\]) also suggests thay the sum of the two $\pi^{+}$ perupheral–dominctee $\pi^{-}p\rightarrow\pi^{-}\pn^{+
M^{tri}_{a_{1}\rightarrow 3\pi} = \frac{1}{f_{\pi}} M(a_{1}\rightarrow \sigma\pi) \,,$$ in linear $\sigma$ (L$\sigma$M). Thus the vanishes the soft pion [@ivanov; @ivanov1] $$\label{eq:four} 3\pi}|_{total} = M^{box}_{a_{1}\rightarrow 3\pi} + M^{tri}_{a_{1}\rightarrow \rightarrow 0 \,,$$ compatible with data [@pdg]: $\Gamma(a_{1}\rightarrow\pi(\pi\pi)_{\mathrm{swave}})=1\pm1$ MeV. b\) $\gamma\gamma\rightarrow2\pi^{0}|_{s=m^{2}_{\sigma}}$: Again using pion-quark couplings, it was predicted [@kaloshin] five years before data appeared that this cross should to $10$ nbarns in the $700$ MeV region. Equivalently, using the SPT theorem stemming from Eq. (\[eq:identity\]), predict the amplitude due to the quark box quark triangle graphs of 2 $$\label{eq:five} \langle \pi^{0}\pi^{0}|\gamma\gamma \rangle \left[ \frac{i}{f_{\pi}}\langle\sigma|\gamma\gamma\rangle + \right] 0 as $s\rightarrow m^2_{\sigma}(700)$ This picture was supported by recent Crystal Ball data [@crystalball]. c\) $\pi^{-}p\rightarrow\pi^{-}\pi^{+}n$: The SPT stemming from Eq. also suggests sum of two peripheral–dominated
    M^{tri}_{a_{1}\rightarrow 3\pi} = \frac{1}{f_{\pi}} 
    M(A_{1}\rightarroW \sigmA\pi) \,,$$ BecAuSe $2g_{\sIgma\Pi\pi}=(m^{2}_{\sigma}-m^{2}_{\pi})/f_{\PI}$ in tHe linear $\sigma$ model (L$\sigMa$M). ThUs THe suM Of (\[Eq:two\]) And (\[eq:thREe\]) VANisHeS iN thE sOFt Pion lImiT [@ivanov; @Ivanov1] $$\labeL{eq:FoUr}
    M_{a_{1}\rightarrOW 3\pI}|_{total} =
    M^{box}_{A_{1}\riGhtarrow 3\pi} +
    M^{tRi}_{a_{1}\RightaRrOw 3\pI} \RightArrOw 0 \,,$$ comPatiblE With daTa [@pdg]: $\GammA(a_{1}\RIghtarROw\pi(\pi\pI)_{\MAtHrm{sWave}})=1\pm1$ MeV.

b\) $\gamma\gaMMa\RIghtarrow2\pi^{0}|_{s=m^{2}_{\sIgma}}$:

AgAiN UsING psEudOscalar pioN-qUark cOUplings, IT wAS PRedICted [@kaloshin] fIve years befORe dAta appEaRed THat thiS $\gammA\gAMma\Rightarrow2\pI^{0}$ croSs section Should FAll to abOUt $10$ nbarnS in the $700$ meV RegIon. EQUiVaLenTlY, UsiNG tHe Spt thEorem steMmInG from eq. (\[eq:IDENTity\]), We pRediCt the Amplitude due tO thE quaRK boX plus Quark TriaNgLe graPhs of FIg. 2 $$\labEl{Eq:five}
    \langle \pi^{0}\pI^{0}|\gamMa\gamma \raNglE \rIghTaRrow
    \lEFt[ - \frac{I}{f_{\pI}}\laNgle\sigMa|\gamma\GAmmA\rANGLe +
    \Frac{i}{f_{\pi}}\langle\sigmA|\gAMMa\Gamma\ranGle \rigHT] \rIgHTarrow 0 \,,$$ as $S\rIghTarrOW M^2_{\sigmA}(700)$ [@ivaNOv1]. this pictUre was SUpPoRted by rEcEnt CryStAl BAll Data [@cRYstaLball].

c\) $\Pi^{-}p\rightArrow\PI^{-}\pi^{+}n$:

The SPT stemMIng from Eq. (\[eq:idENtITY\]) aLSo suGgeSts that the sUm of THe twO $\pi^{+}$ pERiPheRAl–domInateD $\pI^{-}P\rIGhtarrow\pi^{-}\pi^{+
    M^{tri}_{a_{1}\rightar row 3\pi}= \fr ac{ 1}{ f_ {\pi }}     M(a_{1}\ri g htar row \sigma\pi) \,,$$ b ecaus e$ 2g_{ \ si gma\p i\pi}=( m ^{ 2 } _{\ si gm a}- m^ { 2} _{\pi })/ f_{\pi} $ in the l ine ar  $\sigma$ mo d el  (L$\sigma $M) . Thus the s umof (\[ eq :tw o \]) a nd(\[eq :three \ ]) van ishes inth e  softp ion lim i t  [ @iva nov; @ivanov1] $$ \ la b el{eq:four}
   M_{a _{ 1 }\ r i ght arr ow 3\pi}|_ {t otal} =
    M ^ {b o x } _{a _ {1}\rightarro w 3\pi} +
  M ^{tri} _{ a_{ 1 }\righ tarro w3 \pi } \rightarr ow 0  \,,$$ co mpatib l e withd ata [@p dg]: $ \Ga mma (a_{ 1 }\ ri ght ar r ow\ p i( \pi \ pi) _{\mathr m{ sw ave}} )=1\ p m 1 $  MeV .
b\)$\gam ma\gamma\righ tar row2 \ pi^ {0}|_ {s=m^ {2}_ {\ sigma }}$:
Again  u sing pseudoscal ar p ion-quark  co up lin gs , itw as pre dic ted  [@kalo shin] f i veye a r s  b efore data appeare dt h at  this $\ gamma\ g am ma \ rightarr ow 2\p i^{0 } $  cros s se c ti on shoul d fall to  a bout $1 0$  nbarn sinthe  $700 $  MeV  regio n. Equiv alent l y, using the S P T theorem ste m mi n g  f r om E q.(\[eq:ident ity\ ] ), w e pr e di ctt he am plitu de du e  to the quark box p lu s quar k tri angle graphsof Fig. 2$ $ \ label{eq :fiv e }   \langle \pi ^{0}\ pi^{0}|\ga m ma\gamma  \ran gle \rig htarrow
 \left[- \ fra c{i }{f _ { \p i}}\langle\si g m a|\g am ma\gamm a\r angle + 
   \ fra c{i }{ f_{\pi}}\ langle\s ig ma |\ ga mma \gamm a \rangle\r igh t]  \r ighta r row 0\,,$$  as$s \r i ght arrow m ^ 2_ { \ sigm a} (7 00)$  [@ iv anov1 ]. T h ispicture  was supp ort e d by  r ec ent Cry stal Ball dat a[@crystalb al l]. 

c\)$ \ pi^{-}p\ rightarrow\pi^{-}\pi^{+ } n$:

Th e S PT st emmi ng from E q.(\[eq: ide n tity\] ) also  sugg es tst h at th e su m o fthe two $\ p i ^{+ }$ pe ri pher al–domi nated $\pi^{-}p\ri g hta rrow\pi^{-}\p i^{ +
 _ _M^{tri}_{a_{1}\rightarrow 3\pi} = \frac{1}{f_{\pi}}_
 __ M(a_{1}\rightarrow_\sigma\pi)_\,,$$ because $2g_{\sigma\pi\pi}=(m^{2}_{\sigma}-m^{2}_{\pi})/f_{\pi}$_in the linear_$\sigma$ model (L$\sigma$M). Thus_the sum of (\[eq:two\])_and (\[eq:three\])_vanishes in the soft pion limit [@ivanov; @ivanov1] $$\label{eq:four}
    M_{a_{1}\rightarrow 3\pi}|_{total} =
__ _M^{box}_{a_{1}\rightarrow_3\pi}_+
    M^{tri}_{a_{1}\rightarrow_3\pi} \rightarrow 0 \,,$$ compatible_with data [@pdg]:_$\Gamma(a_{1}\rightarrow\pi(\pi\pi)_{\mathrm{swave}})=1\pm1$ MeV.

b\) $\gamma\gamma\rightarrow2\pi^{0}|_{s=m^{2}_{\sigma}}$:

Again using pseudoscalar pion-quark couplings, it_was_predicted [@kaloshin] five years_before data appeared that this $\gamma\gamma\rightarrow2\pi^{0}$ cross section should_fall to about $10$ nbarns in_the $700$ MeV_region._Equivalently,_using the SPT theorem_stemming from Eq. (\[eq:identity\]), we predict the_amplitude due to the quark box_plus quark triangle graphs of Fig. 2 $$\label{eq:five}
_   \langle \pi^{0}\pi^{0}|\gamma\gamma \rangle_\rightarrow
    \left[_- \frac{i}{f_{\pi}}\langle\sigma|\gamma\gamma\rangle_+
    \frac{i}{f_{\pi}}\langle\sigma|\gamma\gamma\rangle_\right] \rightarrow 0_\,,$$ as_$s\rightarrow m^2_{\sigma}(700)$ [@ivanov1]. This_picture was supported by recent Crystal_Ball data [@crystalball].

c\) $\pi^{-}p\rightarrow\pi^{-}\pi^{+}n$:

The_SPT stemming from Eq. (\[eq:identity\]) also suggests_that_the sum of_the_two_$\pi^{+}$ peripheral–dominated_$\pi^{-}p\rightarrow\pi^{-}\pi^{+