 shells, hence line emission from such shells is strongly enhanced compared to collisional thermal radiations. For instance, the Ly$\rm \delta$ line at 14.8 $\rm \AA$ is stronger than the Ly$\rm \gamma$ line at 15.2 $\rm \AA$. Similar conditions can be found in many other transitions, e.g., the He$\rm \delta$ line at 17.4 $\rm \AA$, the Ly$\rm \delta$ line at 19.4 $\rm \AA$, and Ly$\rm \delta$ line at 26.4 $\rm \AA$. The derived CX spectrum also features a large G ratio, i.e., forbidden plus intercombination lines to resonance line ratio, since the collisional excitation process becomes negligible in CX plasmas (§2).

Bias from systematic weight
---------------------------

As reported recently by Nolte et al. (2012), the singlet-to-triplet ratio of the $\rm C^{4+}$ ion, produced from a low-velocity $\rm C^{5+}$ $+ \rm H$ reaction, covers a broad range of $0.01 - 100$ for different $n$, $l$, and $v$. The apparent bias from the commonly adopted, statistical value 3 is probably caused by electron-electron interaction during the capture. A similar effect was also reported in other papers (e.g., Wu et al. 2011 for $\rm N^{6+}$ $+ \rm H$ reaction), indicating that it could be a common property. Although the current data are yet too sparse to fully implement the $S-$ dependence, it is vital to estimate the induced biases on emission line ratios. As shown in Figure 4, we compare the G ratio calculated based on the data from Nolte et al. (2012), with that assuming statistical weight for the $\rm C^{5+}$ $+ \rm H$ reaction. The largest bias is seen at $v \sim 500$ km $\rm s^{-1}$, where the statistical weight is underestimated by about 30%. The two ratios become roughly consistent at low and high velocity ends. The figure suggests that the current code can well cover the actual G ratio range, although the derived velocity would have a systematic error up to $200-300$ km $\rm s^{-1}$.

Real data fitting
=================

To verify the CX model, we fit it to the real data of comet C/2000 WM1 (LINEAR) observed by the
shells, hence line emission from such carapace is powerfully enhanced compared to collisional thermal radiation sickness. For example, the Ly$\rm \delta$ line at 14.8 $ \rm \AA$ is stronger than the Ly$\rm \gamma$ tune at 15.2 $ \rm \AA$. like conditions can be found in many other transitions, for example, the He$\rm \delta$ line at 17.4 $ \rm \AA$, the Ly$\rm \delta$ line at 19.4 $ \rm \AA$, and Ly$\rm \delta$ line at 26.4 $ \rm \AA$. The derived CX spectrum besides features a large deoxyguanosine monophosphate ratio, i.e., forbidden plus intercombination lines to resonance channel ratio, since the collisional excitation process become negligible in CX plasmas (§ 2). 

 Bias from systematic weight 
 --------------------------- 

 As reported recently by Nolte et al. (2012), the singlet - to - triplet proportion of the $ \rm C^{4+}$ ion, produced from a broken - velocity $ \rm C^{5+}$ $ + \rm H$ reaction, covers a wide range of $ 0.01 - 100 $ for different $ n$, $ l$, and $ v$. The apparent bias from the commonly adopted, statistical value 3 is probably caused by electron - electron interaction during the capture. A similar effect was also reported in other papers (e.g., Wu et al. 2011 for $ \rm N^{6+}$ $ + \rm H$ reaction), indicating that it could be a common place. Although the current datum are yet too sparse to fully enforce the $ S-$ dependence, it is vital to estimate the induce bias on emission line ratio. As shown in Figure 4, we compare the G ratio calculated based on the datum from Nolte et al. (2012), with that assuming statistical weight for the $ \rm C^{5+}$ $ + \rm H$ reaction. The largest bias is seen at $ v \sim 500 $ kilometer $ \rm s^{-1}$, where the statistical system of weights is underestimated by about 30% . The two ratios become roughly reproducible at low and high velocity end. The figure suggests that the current code can well cover the actual G proportion range, although the derived velocity would have a systematic mistake up to $ 200 - 300 $ km $ \rm s^{-1}$. 

 actual data match 
 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 

 To verify the CX exemplar, we fit it to the real datum of comet C/2000 WM1 (LINEAR) observed by the
 shflls, hence line emission from such shells is svrongly enhancea compared to collisional thxrmao raduations. For instance, tfe Ly$\rm \dvlta$ line at 14.8 $\em \AA$ is svdonger bkan tgc Ly$\rk \gamma$ line at 15.2 $\rm \AA$. Sikilar conditiots ccn be found in many other transitionf, e.g., thr Je$\rm \delta$ ling at 17.4 $\wm \AZ$, the Ly$\rm \delta$ line at 19.4 $\rm \AA$, ans Ly$\rm \velta$ line at 26.4 $\tm \AA$. The derived CX spectgum wlso features a lagge G ratio, i.e., sirbidden plur intercombination lings to resonance line ratio, since the eollisional ezcihdtion procews bebomes negliginke in WX plaskas (§2).

Bias from xysvemaric weight
---------------------------

As reported recently by Nolte et al. (2012), tve singlet-to-triplet rqtio mf tve $\ro C^{4+}$ kon, pcodhced fgom a low-velodity $\rm C^{5+}$ $+ \em H$ reaction, coverx w broad range kf $0.01 - 100$ sow different $n$, $l$, and $v$. The apparent bias frkm the commonly adopted, statistical value 3 id probablr caused by electron-electron interaction during tve ca'tjre. A rumllar effect was also reported in other papers (s.g., Wl et al. 2011 for $\rm N^{6+}$ $+ \rm H$ reacyiln), yndicating thxt it ekumd be a common prooerty. Ajthouth the cuwreny data are yet too sparse ti fully implvmenr the $S-$ dependence, it is vitau to estikate the induced biases on smission lije ratios. Xs shown in Figufe 4, wa compart the G ratio calctlated bawed pn the aata from Golte et ap. (2012), wibv that assuming stwtistncal feight for the $\rm C^{5+}$ $+ \rm H$ reaction. The lacjest bias is xean dt $v \sim 500$ km $\vm s^{-1}$, where the ftatistical wenght is bnderertimated bj about 30%. Vhe two ratijs become roucjly consisteit at low and higy velockgy ends. The fibure suggvsus that thw current code can weum cover the actbcl G ratio range, sltfoudh tie dewhved velocitf wojld nave x systematig efror up to $200-300$ km $\rm s^{-1}$.

Real gata fitting
=================

To verify yhc CX modeo, we fit it to the resl data of comet C/2000 WM1 (LMNEAR) ubserfed by the
shells, hence line emission from such shells enhanced to collisional radiations. For instance, 14.8 \AA$ is stronger the Ly$\rm \gamma$ at 15.2 $\rm \AA$. Similar conditions be found in many other transitions, e.g., the He$\rm \delta$ line at 17.4 \AA$, the Ly$\rm \delta$ line at 19.4 $\rm \AA$, and Ly$\rm \delta$ line 26.4 \AA$. derived spectrum also features a large G ratio, i.e., forbidden plus intercombination lines to resonance line ratio, the collisional excitation process becomes negligible in CX (§2). Bias from systematic --------------------------- As reported recently by et (2012), the ratio the C^{4+}$ ion, produced a low-velocity $\rm C^{5+}$ $+ \rm H$ reaction, covers a broad range of $0.01 - 100$ for $n$, $l$, The apparent from commonly statistical value 3 caused by electron-electron interaction during the effect was also reported in other papers (e.g., et al. for $\rm N^{6+}$ $+ \rm H$ indicating that it could be a common property. the current data are yet too sparse to fully implement the $S-$ dependence, it is estimate the induced biases emission line ratios. shown Figure we the G calculated based on the data from Nolte et al. (2012), with assuming statistical weight for the $\rm C^{5+}$ $+ \rm H$ largest is seen at \sim 500$ km $\rm where statistical weight is underestimated 30%. two consistent low high velocity ends. The suggests that the current code well cover the actual derived velocity would have a systematic error up $200-300$ km $\rm s^{-1}$. Real data fitting To verify the CX model, we fit it to the real data comet C/2000 observed by the
 shells, hence line emission frOm such shelLs is sTroNglY eNhanCed cOmpared to colliSIonaL thermal radiations. For iNstanCe, THe Ly$\RM \dElta$ lIne at 14.8 $\rm \aa$ iS STroNgEr ThaN tHE LY$\rm \gaMma$ Line at 15.2 $\rM \AA$. Similar ConDiTions can be foUNd In many otheR trAnsitions, e.g., tHe HE$\rm \delTa$ LinE At 17.4 $\rm \Aa$, thE Ly$\rm \Delta$ lINe at 19.4 $\rm \aA$, and Ly$\rm \DeLTa$ line AT 26.4 $\rm \AA$. ThE DErIved cX spectrum also feaTUrES a large G ratio, i.E., forbiDdEN pLUS inTerCombinatioN lInes tO ResonanCE lINE RatIO, since the collIsional exciTAtiOn procEsS beCOmes neGligiBlE In Cx plasmas (§2).

BiaS froM systematIc weigHT
---------------------------

As repoRTed receNtly by nolTe eT al. (2012), tHE sInGleT-tO-TriPLeT raTIo oF the $\rm C^{4+}$ iOn, PrOduceD froM A LOW-velOciTy $\rm c^{5+}$ $+ \rm H$ rEaction, covers A brOad rANge Of $0.01 - 100$ for DiffeRent $N$, $l$, And $v$. THe appaRent bIaS from the commonlY adoPted, statiStiCaL vaLuE 3 is prOBably cAusEd bY electrOn-electROn iNtERACtIon during the capturE. A SIMiLar effecT was alSO rEpORted in otHeR paPers (E.G., wu et aL. 2011 for $\RM N^{6+}$ $+ \Rm H$ reactIon), indICaTiNg that iT cOuld be A cOmmOn pRoperTY. AltHough tHe currenT data ARe yet too sparse TO fully implemeNT tHE $s-$ dEPendEncE, it is vital tO estIMate The iNDuCed BIases On emiSsIOn LIne ratios. As shown in FIgUre 4, we cOmparE the G ratio calCulated basED ON the data From nOlTE et al. (2012), with that aSsumiNg statistiCAl weight For thE $\rm C^{5+}$ $+ \rm H$ rEaction. ThE LArgest biAs iS seEn aT $v \sIM 500$ Km $\Rm s^{-1}$, where the stATIstiCaL weight Is uNderestImaTed By aBouT 30%. THe two ratiOs become RoUgHlY cOnsIstenT At low and HiGh vElOciTy endS. the figUre suGgesTs ThAT thE currenT CoDE Can wElL cOver The AcTual G RatiO RanGe, althoUgh the derIveD VeloCiTy Would haVe a systematic ErRor up to $200-300$ km $\rM s^{-1}$.

reaL data fITTing
=================

To veRify the CX model, we fit it to THe real dAta Of comEt C/2000 Wm1 (LINEAR) obSerVed by tHe
 shells, hence line emissi on from su ch sh ell s i sstro ngly  enhanced comp a redto collisional thermal  radi at i ons. Fo r ins tance,t he L y$\ rm  \ del ta $  l ine a t 1 4.8 $\r m \AA$ isstr on ger than the Ly $\rm \gamm a$line at 15.2  $\ rm \AA $.  Si m ilarcon ditio ns can be fou nd in man yo ther t r ansitio n s ,e.g. , the He$\rm \del t a$ line at 17.4 $ \rm \A A$ ,  t h e  Ly $\r m \delta$li ne at 19.4 $\ r m\ A A $,a nd Ly$\rm \de lta$ line a t  26 .4 $\r m\AA $ . Thederiv ed CXspectrum al so f eatures a  large G ratio ,  i.e.,forbid den  pl us i n te rc omb in a tio n  l ine s  to  resonan ce  l ine r atio , s i ncethe  col lisio nal excitatio n p roce s s b ecome s neg ligi bl e inCX pla smas(§ 2).

Bias fromsyst ematic we igh t--- -- ----- - ------ --- --- ----

A s repor t edre c e n tl y by Nolte et al.(2 0 1 2) , the si nglet- t o- tr i plet rat io  of  the $ \rm C ^{4+ } $ion, pro ducedf ro ma low-v el ocity$\ rmC^{ 5+}$$ + \r m H$ r eaction,  cove r s a broad rang e  of $0.01 - 1 0 0$ f or diff ere nt $n$, $l$ , an d  $v$ . Th e  a ppa r ent b ias f ro m  t h e commonly adopted,  s tatist icalvalue 3 is pr obably cau s e d  by elec tron - el e ctron interact ion d uring thec apture.A sim ilar eff ect was a l s o report edinoth erp a pe rs (e.g., Wue t  al.  2 011 for  $\ rm N^{6 +}$  $+  \r m H $reaction) , indica ti ng  t ha t i t cou l d be a c om mon  p rop erty. Althou gh th e cu rr en t  da ta arey et t oo s pa rs e to  fu ll y imp leme n t t he $S-$  dependen ce, it i svi tal toestimate thein duced bias es  on  emiss i o n line r atios. As shown in Figu r e 4, we  co mpare  the  G ratiocal culate d b a sed on  the d ata f ro m N o l te et a l.  (2 01 2), with t h a t a ssumi ng  sta tistica l weight for the $ \ rmC^{5+}$ $+ \r m H $ re a c ti on. Th e  la rg e stb i as is seen at $ v \sim 500 $k m$\rm s^{-1 } $,wh ere the  statis tical weightis undere stimatedby  abo u t  30 %. The two  ratiosbecome ro u ghlyc on siste ntat low  a ndhighveloci t y e nds.The fi gu re sug gests  t hat thecurrent code can well c over t he ac tua l G ratio  ra n ge,  although  the  derived v elo cit y wou ldh ave a  sys t em ati c  erro r up to $200-3 0 0$  km $ \r m s^{-1}$.R e aldatafit t ing
== ==== ===========

To v e rify the CX mo del, w e f iti t to  t he real data o f c om e t  C/2000WM 1 (LINEAR)observed  b y  the
 shells,_hence line_emission from such shells_is strongly_enhanced_compared to_collisional_thermal radiations. For_instance, the Ly$\rm_\delta$ line at 14.8_$\rm \AA$ is_stronger_than the Ly$\rm \gamma$ line at 15.2 $\rm \AA$. Similar conditions can be found_in_many other_transitions,_e.g.,_the He$\rm \delta$ line at_17.4 $\rm \AA$, the Ly$\rm_\delta$ line_at 19.4 $\rm \AA$, and Ly$\rm \delta$ line_at_26.4 $\rm \AA$._The derived CX spectrum also features a large G_ratio, i.e., forbidden plus intercombination lines_to resonance line_ratio,_since_the collisional excitation process_becomes negligible in CX plasmas (§2).

Bias_from systematic weight
---------------------------

As reported recently by_Nolte et al. (2012), the singlet-to-triplet ratio_of the $\rm C^{4+}$ ion, produced_from a low-velocity $\rm C^{5+}$_$+ \rm_H$ reaction, covers a broad_range of $0.01_- 100$_for different $n$,_$l$, and $v$. The apparent bias_from the commonly_adopted, statistical value 3 is probably_caused_by electron-electron interaction_during_the_capture. A_similar effect was_also_reported in_other_papers (e.g., Wu et al. 2011_for_$\rm N^{6+}$ $+ \rm H$ reaction), indicating_that it could be_a_common property. Although the_current data are yet too_sparse to fully implement the $S-$_dependence, it_is vital_to estimate the induced biases on emission line ratios. As shown_in Figure 4, we compare the_G ratio calculated based_on the_data_from Nolte et_al._(2012), with_that assuming statistical weight for the $\rm_C^{5+}$ $+_\rm H$ reaction. The largest bias_is seen at $v_\sim_500$ km $\rm s^{-1}$, where the_statistical weight is underestimated by about_30%. The two ratios become_roughly_consistent_at low and high velocity_ends. The figure suggests that the_current code can_well cover the actual G ratio range,_although_the derived velocity would have a_systematic_error up to $200-300$ km $\rm_s^{-1}$.

Real_data_fitting
=================

To verify the CX model,_we fit it to the real_data of comet C/2000 WM1 (LINEAR) observed by the