 an invariant measure of $X$ if it is an invariant measure of $X_t$ for every $t \in \mathbb{R}$. We will denote by $\mathcal{M}_X$ the set of all invariant measures of $X$. A subset $Y\subset Z$ has *total probability* if for every $\mu\in \mathcal{M}_X$ we have $\mu(Y)=1$ (see [@Man82]). The support of a measure $\mu$, denoted by $supp(\mu)$, is the set of points for which the measure is non-zero. An invariant measure is said to be *atomic* if its support is either a closed orbit or a singularity.

A probability measure $\mu$ is an *ergodic measure* if for every invariant set $A$ we have $\mu(A) = 1$ or $\mu(A) = 0$. Finally, a certain property is said to be valid in *$\mu$-almost every point* if it is valid in the whole Z except, possibly, in a set of null measure.

We recall the definition of $\delta$-closable points of [@Man82]. We say that a point $x \in M \setminus Sing(X)$ is $\delta$-closable if, for any $C^1$ neighborhood ${{\mathcal U}}\subset {\mathfrak{X}^{1}(M)}$ of $X$, there exists a vector field $Z \in {{\mathcal U}}$, a point $z \in M$ and $T > 0$ such that:

1.  $Z_T(z) = z$,

2.  $Z = X$ on $M \setminus B_{\delta} (X_{[0, T]}(x))$ and

3.  $dist(Z_t(z), X_t(x)) < \delta, \forall 0 \leq t \leq T$.

We denote by $\Sigma(X)$ the set of points of $M$ which are $\delta$-closable for any $\delta$ sufficiently small.

If $\Lambda$ is a strongly homogeneous set for $X$ with singularities all of them hyperbolic, then $X$ is a star flow in $\Lambda$.

By Ergodic Closing Lemma, the $\delta$-closable set of $X$ has total probability.

If $x \in \Lambda$ is a regular $\delta$-closable point
an invariant measure of $ X$ if it is an invariant measure of $ X_t$ for every $ metric ton \in \mathbb{R}$. We will announce by $ \mathcal{M}_X$ the set of all invariant bill of $ X$. A subset $ Y\subset Z$ have * total probability * if for every $ \mu\in \mathcal{M}_X$ we have $ \mu(Y)=1 $ (experience [ @Man82 ]). The accompaniment of a measure $ \mu$, denote by $ supp(\mu)$, is the set of points for which the meter is non - zero. An invariant measure is suppose to be * atomic * if its support is either a closed orbit or a singularity. 

 A probability measure $ \mu$ is an * ergodic measure * if for every changeless set $ A$ we have $ \mu(A) = 1 $ or $ \mu(A) = 0$. Finally, a sealed property is said to be valid in * $ \mu$-almost every point * if it is valid in the whole Z except, possibly, in a stage set of null measure. 

 We recall the definition of $ \delta$-closable points of [ @Man82 ]. We say that a point $ x \in M \setminus Sing(X)$ is $ \delta$-closable if, for any $ C^1 $ vicinity $ { { \mathcal U}}\subset { \mathfrak{X}^{1}(M)}$ of $ X$, there exists a vector field $ Z \in { { \mathcal U}}$, a point $ z \in M$ and $ T > 0 $ such that: 

 1.   $ Z_T(z) = z$, 

 2.   $ Z = X$ on $ M \setminus B_{\delta } (X_{[0, T]}(x))$ and 

 3.   $ dist(Z_t(z), X_t(x) ) < \delta, \forall 0 \leq t \leq T$. 

 We denote by $ \Sigma(X)$ the set of points of $ M$ which are $ \delta$-closable for any $ \delta$ sufficiently small. 

 If $ \Lambda$ is a strongly homogeneous set for $ X$ with singularities all of them hyperbolic, then $ X$ is a star flow in $ \Lambda$. 

 By Ergodic Closing Lemma, the $ \delta$-closable stage set of $ X$ has total probability. 

 If $ x \in \Lambda$ is a even $ \delta$-closable point
 an invariant measure of $X$ lf it is an invatiqnt meesure or $X_t$ for every $t \in \mathbb{R}$. We will venore by $\mathcal{M}_X$ the set of xll invarpant measyres if $X$. A subset $Y\subset Z$ gws *tmval probability* if for evary $\mu\in \mathcdl{O}_X$ we have $\mu(Y)=1$ (see [@Man82]). The support of a measirf $\mu$, denoted bi $supk(\mu)$, is fhe set of points for which the mezsure iv non-zero. An onvariant measure is said ho bf *atomic* if its suoport is eijger q closed orbkt or a singularity.

A ptobability measure $\mu$ is an *ergoaic mzasure* if fir evfty invariant set $W$ we have $\mu(A) = 1$ or $\mg(A) = 0$. Fimally, a certaik pro'ertt is said to be valid in *$\mu$-almost every point* if ic is valid in the whooe Z exwept, posrublh, ih e sst of julm measure.

Ws recall thw definition of $\delua$-cjisable points of [@Mag82]. Re say that a point $x \in M \setminus Sinc(X)$ js $\delta$-closable if, for any $C^1$ neighborhood ${{\mwthcal U}}\stbset {\mathfrak{X}^{1}(M)}$ of $X$, there exists a vector field $Z \in {{\oatkgwu U}}$, a point $z \in M$ and $T > 0$ such that:

1.  $Z_T(z) = z$,

2.  $Z = S$ pn $M \setminus B_{\dclta} (X_{[0, T]}(x))$ and

3.  $disy(Z_h(z), V_t(x)) < \delta, \fotall 0 \lzs f \leq T$.

We denote bj $\Sigma(V)$ the set of pjintx of $M$ which are $\delta$-closavle for any $\belra$ sufficiently smcll.

If $\Lambda$ is s strpngly homogeneous set fur $X$ with singuparities zul of them hypercolpc, tven $X$ is a star flow in $\Laibda$.

By Erjodic Closine Lekma, thq $\delta$-clodable set of $X$ has total probcbilidy.

If $x \in \Pambda$ is a regular $\delta$-closable point
an invariant measure of $X$ if it invariant of $X_t$ every $t \in $\mathcal{M}_X$ set of all measures of $X$. subset $Y\subset Z$ has *total probability* for every $\mu\in \mathcal{M}_X$ we have $\mu(Y)=1$ (see [@Man82]). The support of a $\mu$, denoted by $supp(\mu)$, is the set of points for which the measure non-zero. invariant is to be *atomic* if its support is either a closed orbit or a singularity. A probability $\mu$ is an *ergodic measure* if for every set $A$ we have = 1$ or $\mu(A) = Finally, certain property said be in *$\mu$-almost every if it is valid in the whole Z except, possibly, in a set of null measure. We the definition points of We that point $x \in Sing(X)$ is $\delta$-closable if, for any U}}\subset {\mathfrak{X}^{1}(M)}$ of $X$, there exists a vector $Z \in U}}$, a point $z \in M$ $T > 0$ such that: 1. $Z_T(z) = 2. $Z = X$ on $M \setminus B_{\delta} (X_{[0, T]}(x))$ and 3. $dist(Z_t(z), X_t(x)) < 0 \leq t \leq We denote by the of of which are for any $\delta$ sufficiently small. If $\Lambda$ is a strongly homogeneous for $X$ with singularities all of them hyperbolic, then $X$ star in $\Lambda$. By Closing Lemma, the $\delta$-closable of has total probability. If \Lambda$ a
 an invariant measure of $X$ if it Is an invariAnt meAsuRe oF $X_T$ for EverY $t \in \mathbb{R}$. We wILl deNote by $\mathcal{M}_X$ the set oF all iNvARianT MeAsureS of $X$. A suBSeT $y\SubSeT Z$ Has *ToTAl ProbaBilIty* if foR every $\mu\in \MatHcAl{M}_X$ we have $\mu(y)=1$ (SeE [@Man82]). The supPorT of a measure $\mU$, deNoted bY $sUpp(\MU)$, is thE seT of poInts foR Which tHe measure Is NOn-zero. aN invariANT mEasuRe is said to be *atomiC* If ITs support is eitHer a clOsED oRBIt oR a sIngularity.

a pRobabILity meaSUrE $\MU$ Is aN *Ergodic measurE* if for every INvaRiant sEt $a$ we HAve $\mu(A) = 1$ Or $\mu(A) = 0$. fiNAllY, a certain prOperTy is said tO be valID in *$\mu$-alMOst everY point* If iT is ValiD In ThE whOlE z exCEpT, poSSibLy, in a set Of NuLl meaSure.

wE RECall The DefiNitioN of $\delta$-closaBle PoinTS of [@man82]. We Say thAt a pOiNt $x \in m \setmiNus SiNg(x)$ is $\delta$-closablE if, fOr any $C^1$ neiGhbOrHooD ${{\mAthcaL u}}\subseT {\maThfRak{X}^{1}(M)}$ of $x$, there eXIstS a VECToR field $Z \in {{\mathcal U}}$, a PoINT $z \In M$ and $T > 0$ sUch thaT:

1.  $z_T(Z) = z$,

2.  $z = x$ on $M \setmInUs B_{\DeltA} (x_{[0, t]}(x))$ and

3.  $Dist(z_T(z), x_t(x)) < \delta, \Forall 0 \LEq T \lEq T$.

We deNoTe by $\SiGmA(X)$ tHe sEt of pOInts Of $M$ whiCh are $\delTa$-cloSAble for any $\deltA$ Sufficiently sMAlL.

iF $\LAMbda$ Is a Strongly homOgenEOus sEt foR $x$ wIth SIngulAritiEs ALl OF them hyperbolic, then $x$ iS a star Flow iN $\Lambda$.

By ErgoDic Closing lEMMa, the $\delTa$-clOSaBLe set of $X$ has totAl proBability.

If $X \In \Lambda$ Is a reGular $\delTa$-closablE POint
 an invariant measure of $ X$ if it i s aninv ari an t me asur e of $X_t$ for ever y $t \in \mathbb{R}$.We wi ll deno t eby $\ mathcal { M} _ X $ t he  s etof al l inv ari ant mea sures of $ X$.  A  subset $Y\s u bs et Z$ has*to tal probabil ity * if f or  ev e ry $\ mu\ in \m athcal { M}_X$we have $ \m u (Y)=1$ (see [@ M a n8 2]).  The support of a me a sure $\mu$, de notedby $s u p p(\ mu) $, is these t ofp oints f o rw h i cht he measure is  non-zero.A n i nvaria nt  me a sure i s sai dt o b e *atomic*if i ts suppor t is e i ther ac losed o rbit o r a  si ngul a ri ty .
Ap rob a bi lit y  me asure $\ mu $is an  *er g o d i c me asu re*if fo r every invar ian t se t  $A $ wehave$\mu (A ) = 1 $ or $ \mu(A )= 0$. Finally,a ce rtain pro per ty  is  s aid t o  be va lid  in  *$\mu$ -almost eve ry p o in t* if it is validin t he  whole Z  excep t ,po s sibly, i na s et o f nullmeas u re .

We re call t h ede finitio nof $\d el ta$ -cl osabl e  poi nts of  [@Man82 ]. We say that a poi n t $x \in M \s e tm i n us Sing (X) $ is $\delt a$-c l osab le i f ,for any $ C^1$ne i gh b orhood ${{\mathcalU} }\subs et {\ mathfrak{X}^{ 1}(M)}$ of $ X $, there  exi s ts a vector field  $Z \ in {{\math c al U}}$,  a po int $z \ in M$ and $ T > 0$ s uch  th at: 

1 .  $ Z_T(z) = z$,2 .  $ Z= X$ on  $M  \setmi nus  B_ {\d elt a}  (X_{[0,T]}(x))$  a nd 
3.   $ dist( Z _t(z), X _t (x) )< \ delta ,  \fora ll 0\leq  t  \ l eqT$.

We de n o te b y$\ Sigm a(X )$  theseto f p oints o f $M$ whi cha re $ \d el ta$-clo sable for any  $ \delta$ su ff ici entlys m all.

If  $\Lambda$ is a strongl y  homoge neo us se t fo r $X$ wit h s ingula rit i es all  of th em hy pe rbo l i c, th e n  $ X$is  a star fl o w  in  $\La mb da$. 

By Er godic Closing Lemm a , t he $\delta$-c los able s et  of $X $  ha st ota l probability.

I f $x \in \ La m bd a$ is a re g ula r$\delta $-closa ble p o int
 an_invariant measure_of $X$ if it_is an_invariant_measure of_$X_t$_for every $t_\in \mathbb{R}$. We_will denote by $\mathcal{M}_X$_the set of_all_invariant measures of $X$. A subset $Y\subset Z$ has *total probability* if for every_$\mu\in_\mathcal{M}_X$ we_have_$\mu(Y)=1$_(see [@Man82]). The support of_a measure $\mu$, denoted by_$supp(\mu)$, is_the set of points for which the measure_is_non-zero. An invariant_measure is said to be *atomic* if its support_is either a closed orbit or_a singularity.

A probability_measure_$\mu$_is an *ergodic measure*_if for every invariant set $A$_we have $\mu(A) = 1$ or_$\mu(A) = 0$. Finally, a certain property_is said to be valid in_*$\mu$-almost every point* if it_is valid_in the whole Z except,_possibly, in a_set of_null measure.

We recall_the definition of $\delta$-closable points of_[@Man82]. We say_that a point $x \in M_\setminus_Sing(X)$ is $\delta$-closable_if,_for_any $C^1$_neighborhood ${{\mathcal U}}\subset_{\mathfrak{X}^{1}(M)}$_of $X$,_there_exists a vector field $Z \in_{{\mathcal_U}}$, a point $z \in M$ and_$T > 0$ such_that:

1._ $Z_T(z) = z$,

2._ $Z = X$ on_$M \setminus B_{\delta} (X_{[0, T]}(x))$ and

3._ $dist(Z_t(z),_X_t(x)) <_\delta, \forall 0 \leq t \leq T$.

We denote by $\Sigma(X)$ the_set of points of $M$ which_are $\delta$-closable for any_$\delta$ sufficiently_small.

If_$\Lambda$ is a_strongly_homogeneous set_for $X$ with singularities all of them_hyperbolic, then_$X$ is a star flow in_$\Lambda$.

By Ergodic Closing Lemma,_the_$\delta$-closable set of $X$ has total_probability.

If $x \in \Lambda$ is a_regular $\delta$-closable point