tau_{0}$ decays exponentially, with a rate that scales polynomially with $q$.

Consider the kinetically constrained model described above, with $\pi>p^{\text{SP}}$ and $q\le q^{\text{OP}}$.

1.  $\nu$-almost surely the spectral gap is $0$, i.e., the relaxation time is infinite.

2.  There exist two positive constants $c,C$ depending on $\pi$ and a $\nu$-random variable $\tau$ such that

    1.  $\pp_{\mu}\left(\tau_{0}\ge t\right)\le e^{-\nicefrac{t}{\tau}}$ for all $t>0$,

    2.  $\nu\left(\tau\ge t\right)\le C\,t^{\frac{c}{\log q}}$ for $t$ large enough.

Some tools
==========

In this section we will present some tools that will help us analyze the kinetically constrained models that we have introduced. We will start by considering a general state space $\Omega$, and any Markov process on $\Omega$ that is reversible with respect to a certain measure $\mu$. We denote its generator by $\mathcal{L}$ and the associated Dirichlet form by $\mathcal{D}$. We will consider, for some event $A$, its hitting time $\tau_{A}$. With some abuse of notation, we use $\tau_{A}$ also for the $\mu$-random variable giving for every state $\eta\in\Omega$ the expected hitting time at $A$ starting from that state: $$\tau_{A}\left(\eta\right)=\ee_{\eta}\left(\tau_{A}\right).$$

$\tau_{A}\left(\eta\right)$ satisfies the following Poisson problem: $$\begin{aligned}
\mathcal{L}\tau_{A} & =-1\text{ on }A^{c},\label{eq:poissonproblem}\\
\tau_{A} & =0\text{ on }A.\nonumber \end{aligned}$$

By multiplying both sides of the equation by $\tau_{A}$ and integrating with respect to $\mu$, we obtain

\[cor:dirichletequalsexpectation\]$\mu\left(\tau_{A}\right)=\mathcal{D}\tau_{A}$.

Rewriting this corollary as $\mu\left(\tau_{A}\right)=\frac{\mu\left
tau_{0}$ decays exponentially, with a rate that scales polynomially with $ q$. 

 Consider the kinetically restrain exemplar described above, with $ \pi > p^{\text{SP}}$ and $ q\le q^{\text{OP}}$. 

 1.   $ \nu$-almost surely the spectral gap is $ 0 $, i.e., the rest time is infinite. 

 2.   There exist two positivist constant $ c, C$ depend on $ \pi$ and a $ \nu$-random variable $ \tau$ such that 

     1.   $ \pp_{\mu}\left(\tau_{0}\ge t\right)\le e^{-\nicefrac{t}{\tau}}$ for all $ t>0 $, 

     2.   $ \nu\left(\tau\ge t\right)\le C\,t^{\frac{c}{\log q}}$ for $ t$ large enough. 

 Some cock 
 = = = = = = = = = = 

 In this section we will present some instrument that will avail us analyze the kinetically constrained models that we have introduced. We will start by considering a cosmopolitan state space $ \Omega$, and any Markov process on $ \Omega$ that is reversible with deference to a certain measure $ \mu$. We announce its generator by $ \mathcal{L}$ and the associated Dirichlet form by $ \mathcal{D}$. We will see, for some event $ A$, its hitting time $ \tau_{A}$. With some abuse of notation, we practice $ \tau_{A}$ also for the $ \mu$-random variable giving for every state $ \eta\in\Omega$ the expected hitting time at $ A$ startle from that state: $ $ \tau_{A}\left(\eta\right)=\ee_{\eta}\left(\tau_{A}\right).$$ 

 $ \tau_{A}\left(\eta\right)$ satisfies the following Poisson problem: $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 \mathcal{L}\tau_{A } & = -1\text { on } A^{c},\label{eq: poissonproblem}\\ 
 \tau_{A } & = 0\text { on } A.\nonumber \end{aligned}$$ 

 By multiplying both sides of the equation by $ \tau_{A}$ and integrating with respect to $ \mu$, we obtain 

 \[cor: dirichletequalsexpectation\]$\mu\left(\tau_{A}\right)=\mathcal{D}\tau_{A}$. 

 rewrite this corollary as $ \mu\left(\tau_{A}\right)=\frac{\mu\left
tau_{0}$ decays exponentially, wiuh a rate that sccoes ponynomizlly witf $q$.

Consider the kinetically ronsrraintb model described abuve, with $\ii>p^{\text{SP}}$ and $w\le q^{\text{O'}}$.

1.  $\nu$-almost sudcly tke spectral gap ls $0$, i.e., the selaxation tima ks infinite.

2.  There exist two positive constamtd $c,C$ depending on $\ki$ wnd z $\nu$-random variable $\tau$ such that

    1.  $\pp_{\ku}\left(\tau_{0}\ge t\tight)\le e^{-\nicefrac{t}{\tau}}$ for wll $h>0$,

    2.  $\nu\left(\tau\ge t\right)\le C\,j^{\rras{x}{\log q}}$ for $t$ large enolyh.

Some toola
==========

In this section we will preseng somz tools thaj sipn help us aialyze the kinetically convtrainec models that ee iave introduced. We will svart by considering w general scate space $\Omega$, and qnt Marnov [rocdws un $\Kmxga$ that ls ceversible sith respecr to a certain measirq $\mu$. We denote its gqnqrator by $\mathcal{L}$ and the associated Dpricglet form by $\mathcal{D}$. Ww will consider, for slme event $A$, its hitting time $\tau_{A}$. With some abuse of notathon, wx jse $\twj_{Q}$ wlso for the $\mu$-random variable giving for evewg xtste $\eta\in\Omega$ the expectrd hojting time at $X$ starcjnf from that state: $$\hau_{A}\lefj(\eta\ritht)=\ee_{\eta}\ltft(\tai_{A}\right).$$

$\tau_{A}\left(\eta\right)$ satusfies the fjolowing Poisson prlblem: $$\begin{clignec}
\mathval{L}\tau_{A} & =-1\text{ on }A^{c},\labzl{eq:pojssonproblel}\\
\tau_{A} & =0\tesg{ on }A.\nonumber \evd{akicned}$$

By multiplying both siqes of thx equction by $\tau_{S}$ and yntegratinh witm respect to $\mu$, we lbtaiu

\[cor:dhrichleteqkalsexpectation\]$\mu\left(\tau_{A}\right)=\mevhcal{D}\tau_{A}$.

Rewtithng this coxollarn as $\mu\left(\tau_{A}\wight)=\frac{\mu\lefj
tau_{0}$ decays exponentially, with a rate that with Consider the constrained model described q^{\text{OP}}$. $\nu$-almost surely the gap is $0$, the relaxation time is infinite. 2. exist two positive constants $c,C$ depending on $\pi$ and a $\nu$-random variable $\tau$ that 1. $\pp_{\mu}\left(\tau_{0}\ge t\right)\le e^{-\nicefrac{t}{\tau}}$ for all $t>0$, 2. $\nu\left(\tau\ge t\right)\le C\,t^{\frac{c}{\log q}}$ $t$ enough. tools In this section we will present some tools that will help us analyze the kinetically constrained that we have introduced. We will start by a general state space and any Markov process on that reversible with to certain $\mu$. We denote generator by $\mathcal{L}$ and the associated Dirichlet form by $\mathcal{D}$. We will consider, for some event $A$, hitting time some abuse notation, use also for the giving for every state $\eta\in\Omega$ the at $A$ starting from that state: $$\tau_{A}\left(\eta\right)=\ee_{\eta}\left(\tau_{A}\right).$$ $\tau_{A}\left(\eta\right)$ the following problem: $$\begin{aligned} \mathcal{L}\tau_{A} & =-1\text{ on \tau_{A} & =0\text{ on }A.\nonumber \end{aligned}$$ By multiplying sides of the equation by $\tau_{A}$ and integrating with respect to $\mu$, we obtain \[cor:dirichletequalsexpectation\]$\mu\left(\tau_{A}\right)=\mathcal{D}\tau_{A}$. corollary as $\mu\left(\tau_{A}\right)=\frac{\mu\left
tau_{0}$ decays exponentially, witH a rate that ScaleS poLynOmIallY witH $q$.

Consider the kINetiCally constrained model dEscriBeD AbovE, WiTh $\pi>p^{\Text{SP}}$ aND $q\LE Q^{\teXt{oP}}$.

1.  $\Nu$-aLmOSt SurelY thE spectrAl gap is $0$, i.e., tHe rElAxation time iS InFinite.

2.  TherE exIst two positiVe cOnstanTs $C,C$ dEPendiNg oN $\pi$ anD a $\nu$-raNDom varIable $\tau$ sUcH That

    1.  $\pp_{\MU}\left(\taU_{0}\GE t\RighT)\le e^{-\nicefrac{t}{\tau}}$ fOR aLL $t>0$,

    2.  $\nu\left(\tau\ge t\Right)\lE C\,T^{\FrAC{C}{\loG q}}$ fOr $t$ large enOuGh.

SomE Tools
==========

In THiS SECtiON we will presenT some tools tHAt wIll helP uS anALyze thE kineTiCAllY constraineD modEls that we Have inTRoduced. wE will stArt by cOnsIdeRing A GeNeRal StATe sPAcE $\OmEGa$, aNd any MarKoV pRocesS on $\OMEGA$ That Is rEverSible With respect to A ceRtaiN MeaSure $\mU$. We deNote ItS geneRator bY $\mathCaL{L}$ and the associaTed DIrichlet fOrm By $\MatHcAl{D}$. We WIll conSidEr, fOr some eVent $A$, itS HitTiNG TImE $\tau_{A}$. With some abuse Of NOTaTion, we usE $\tau_{A}$ aLSo FoR The $\mu$-ranDoM vaRiabLE GivinG for EVeRy state $\eTa\in\OmEGa$ ThE expectEd HittinG tIme At $A$ StartINg frOm that State: $$\tau_{a}\left(\ETa\right)=\ee_{\eta}\leFT(\tau_{A}\right).$$

$\tau_{a}\LeFT(\EtA\RighT)$ saTisfies the fOlloWIng POissON pRobLEm: $$\begIn{aliGnED}
\mAThcal{L}\tau_{A} & =-1\text{ on }A^{c},\lAbEl{eq:poIssonProblem}\\
\tau_{A} & =0\teXt{ on }A.\nonumBER \End{alignEd}$$

By MUlTIplying both sidEs of tHe equation BY $\tau_{A}$ and IntegRating wiTh respect TO $\Mu$, we obtaIn

\[cOr:dIriChlETEqUalsexpectatiON\]$\Mu\leFt(\Tau_{A}\rigHt)=\mAthcal{D}\Tau_{a}$.

ReWriTinG tHis corollAry as $\mu\lEfT(\tAu_{a}\rIghT)=\frac{\MU\left
tau_{0}$ decays exponentia lly, witha rat e t hat  s cale s po lynomially wit h  $q$ .

Consider the kineti cally  c o nstr a in ed mo del des c ri b e d a bo ve , w it h  $ \pi>p ^{\ text{SP }}$ and $q \le  q ^{\text{OP}} $ .
1.  $\nu$ -al most surelythe  spect ra l g a p is$0$ , i.e ., the relaxa tion time  i s  infin i te.

2. Th ereexist two positiv e  c o nstants $c,C$depend in g  o n $\p i$and a $\nu $- rando m  variab l e$ \ t au$ such that

   1.  $\pp_ { \mu }\left (\ tau _ {0}\ge  t\ri gh t )\l e e^{-\nice frac {t}{\tau} }$ for all $t> 0 $,

   2.  $ \nu \le ft(\ t au \g e t \r i ght ) \l e C \ ,t^ {\frac{c }{ \l og q} }$ f o r $ t$ l arg e en ough. 

Some tools=== ==== = ==
In t his s ecti on  we w ill pr esent  s ome tools thatwill  help usana ly zeth e kin e ticall y c ons trained  models tha tw e ha ve introduced. Wewi l l  s tart byconsid e ri ng a genera lsta te s p a ce $\ Omeg a $,  and any  Marko v  p ro cess on  $ \Omega $tha t i s rev e rsib le wit h respec t toa  certain measu r e $\mu$. We d e no t e  i t s ge ner ator by $\m athc a l{L} $ an d  t hea ssoci atedDi r ic h let form by $\mathc al {D}$.We wi ll consider,for some e v e n t $A$, i ts h i tt i ng time $\tau_ {A}$.  With some abuse of  nota tion, we  use $\ta u _ {A}$ als o f orthe  $\ m u $- random variab l e  giv in g for e ver y state  $\ eta \in \Om eg a$ the ex pected h it ti ng  t ime  at $ A $ starti ng  fr om  th at st a te: $$ \tau_ {A}\ le ft ( \et a\right ) =\ e e _{\e ta }\ left (\t au _{A}\ righ t ).$ $

$\ta u_{A}\lef t(\ e ta\r ig ht )$ sati sfies the fol lo wing Poiss on  pr oblem: $ $\begin{ aligned}
\mathcal{L}\ta u _{A} &=-1 \text { on  }A^{c},\ lab el{eq: poi s sonpro blem}\ \
\ta u_ {A} &  =0\t e x t{  on  } A.\nonumbe r \en d{ali gn ed}$ $

By m ultiplying both si d esof the equati onby $ \ t au _{A } $a ndin t egr a t ing with respec t to $\mu$ ,w eobtain

\[ c or: di richlet equalse xpect a tion\]$ \mu\left( \tau_{A}\ ri ght) = \ mat hcal{D}\ta u_{A}$.
Rewritin g  this co rolla ryas $\m u\ lef t(\ta u_{A}\ r igh t)=\f rac{\m u\ left
tau_{0}$ decays_exponentially, with_a rate that scales_polynomially with_$q$.

Consider_the kinetically_constrained_model described above,_with $\pi>p^{\text{SP}}$ and_$q\le q^{\text{OP}}$.

1.  $\nu$-almost_surely the spectral_gap_is $0$, i.e., the relaxation time is infinite.

2.  There exist two positive constants_$c,C$_depending on_$\pi$_and_a $\nu$-random variable $\tau$ such_that

    1._ $\pp_{\mu}\left(\tau_{0}\ge_t\right)\le e^{-\nicefrac{t}{\tau}}$ for all $t>0$,

   _2._ $\nu\left(\tau\ge t\right)\le_C\,t^{\frac{c}{\log q}}$ for $t$ large enough.

Some tools
==========

In this section_we will present some tools that_will help us_analyze_the_kinetically constrained models that_we have introduced. We will start_by considering a general state space_$\Omega$, and any Markov process on $\Omega$_that is reversible with respect to_a certain measure $\mu$. We_denote its_generator by $\mathcal{L}$ and the_associated Dirichlet form_by $\mathcal{D}$._We will consider,_for some event $A$, its hitting_time $\tau_{A}$. With_some abuse of notation, we use_$\tau_{A}$_also for the_$\mu$-random_variable_giving for_every state $\eta\in\Omega$_the_expected hitting_time_at $A$ starting from that state:_$$\tau_{A}\left(\eta\right)=\ee_{\eta}\left(\tau_{A}\right).$$

$\tau_{A}\left(\eta\right)$_satisfies the following Poisson problem: $$\begin{aligned}
\mathcal{L}\tau_{A} &_=-1\text{ on }A^{c},\label{eq:poissonproblem}\\
\tau_{A} &_=0\text{_on }A.\nonumber \end{aligned}$$

By multiplying_both sides of the equation_by $\tau_{A}$ and integrating with respect_to $\mu$,_we obtain

\[cor:dirichletequalsexpectation\]$\mu\left(\tau_{A}\right)=\mathcal{D}\tau_{A}$.

Rewriting_this corollary as $\mu\left(\tau_{A}\right)=\frac{\mu\left