D_s$ was expected to be an excellent test of lattice QCD, for several reasons [@Briere:2001rn]. The matrix elements in Eqs. (\[eq:kronfeld:AfDs\]) and (\[eq:kronfeld:PfDs\]) are gold-plated, in the sense of Ref. [@Davies:2003ik], namely, only one hadron enters, and the chiral extrapolation is controlled. Experimental measurements of $|V_{cs}|f_{D_s}$, via Eq. (\[eq:kronfeld:BrSM\]), can be combined with the determination of $|V_{cs}|$ from CKM unitarity. The idea that new physics could compete is usually discounted, because the decay is Cabibbo-favored and proceeds at the tree level of the weak interactions. Finally, the precision of experiments has lagged that of calculations, so the analysis of the numerical lattice-QCD data is carried out with a relatively blind eye.

The first round of testing seemed to go well. In June 2005, the first lattice-QCD calculation with 2+1 flavors of sea quarks appeared in a joint work of the Fermilab Lattice and MILC Collaborations: $$f_{D_s} = 249\pm 3 \pm 16~\textrm{MeV}~\textrm{Fermilab/MILC}~%
        \cite{Aubin:2005ar},
    \label{eq:kronfeld:prl05}$$ where the first error is statistical and the second systematic. This prediction was followed a year later by a comparably accurate measurement of $B(D_s\to\mu\nu)/B(D_s\to\phi\pi)$ that, when combined with an independent measurement of $B(D_s\to\phi\pi)$, yielded $$\begin{aligned}
    \hspace*{-1.0em}
    f_{D_s} = 283 \pm 17 \pm 7 \pm 14~\textrm{MeV} & 
        \hspace*{-0.5em} \mu\nu/\phi\pi \hspace*{-0.5em} &
        \textrm{BaBar}~\cite{Aubert:2006sd},
    \label{eq:kronfeld:prl06}\end{aligned}$$ which agrees with Eq. (\[eq:kronfeld:prl05\]) at 1.2
D_s$ was expected to be an excellent test of lattice QCD, for several reason   [ @Briere:2001rn ]. The matrix chemical element in Eqs.   (\[eq: kronfeld: AfDs\ ]) and   (\[eq: kronfeld: PfDs\ ]) are gold - plated, in the sense of Ref.   [ @Davies:2003ik ], namely, entirely one hadron enters, and the chiral extrapolation is controlled. Experimental measurements of $ |V_{cs}|f_{D_s}$, via Eq.   (\[eq: kronfeld: BrSM\ ]), can be combine with the decision of $ |V_{cs}|$ from CKM unitarity. The idea that fresh physics could compete is usually discount, because the decay is Cabibbo - favored and proceeds at the tree degree of the weak interactions. Finally, the precision of experiments has lagged that of calculation, so the analysis of the numerical lattice - QCD data is carried out with a relatively blind center. 

 The first round of examination seemed to move well. In June 2005, the first wicket - QCD calculation with 2 + 1 flavors of sea quarks appeared in a joint study of the Fermilab Lattice and MILC Collaborations: $ $ f_{D_s } = 249\pm 3 \pm 16~\textrm{MeV}~\textrm{Fermilab / MILC}~% 
         \cite{Aubin:2005ar }, 
     \label{eq: kronfeld: prl05}$$ where the first error is statistical and the second systematic. This prediction was followed a year later by a comparably accurate measurement of $ B(D_s\to\mu\nu)/B(D_s\to\phi\pi)$ that, when blend with an independent measurement of $ B(D_s\to\phi\pi)$, yielded $ $ \begin{aligned } 
     \hspace*{-1.0em } 
     f_{D_s } = 283 \pm 17 \pm 7 \pm 14~\textrm{MeV } & 
         \hspace*{-0.5em } \mu\nu/\phi\pi \hspace*{-0.5em } & 
         \textrm{BaBar}~\cite{Aubert:2006sd }, 
     \label{eq: kronfeld: prl06}\end{aligned}$$ which agrees with Eq.   (\[eq: kronfeld: prl05\ ]) at 1.2
D_s$ aas expected to be an exgellent test of lattice QCD, fkr severxl reasons [@Briere:2001rn]. The matrie elwmentw in Eqs. (\[eq:kronfeld:AfDs\]) and (\[eq:krojfeld:PfDw\]) art gold-plated, in tis sense of Rer. [@Favizs:2003mk], namely, only pne hadron enters, and tha zhnral extrapolation is controlled. Expqrimentsl measurements jf $|V_{bs}|s_{D_s}$, bpa Eq. (\[eq:kronfeld:BrSM\]), can be combjned wiuh the determinatipn of $|V_{cs}|$ from CKM unitarihy. Tje idea that new pjysics coule coipete is usuauly discounted, because the decay is Cabibbo-favored ana proeeeds at thg frfg level of tie weah interactiokx. Finanly, the precision of cxpermmenrs has lagged that of calculations, so tre analyshs of the numerical lqtticg-QCD gata us zardixd kut wihh e relativelg blind eye.

Rhe first round of uesepmg seemed to go wejl. In June 2005, the first lattice-QCD calculatpon sith 2+1 flavors of sea quqrks appeared in a jolnt work jf the Fermilab Lattice and MILC Collaborations: $$f_{G_s} = 249\pj 3 \pn 16~\bextfn{MfV}~\textrm{Fermilab/MILC}~%
        \cite{Aubin:2005ar},
    \lafsl{tq:kgonfeld:prl05}$$ where bhe first error is shayystical and tfe second systematic. This pgedictijn waw followeq a uear later by a comparably qccurate meafyrement of $B(D_s\to\mu\uu)/B(D_s\to\phi\pi)$ thaj, when combined with an indepzndent measuremenh of $B(D_s\tk\ohi\pi)$, yielded $$\beein{slhgned}
    \hspace*{-1.0em}
    f_{D_s} = 283 \pm 17 \pm 7 \'m 14~\tertrm{MeV} & 
        \hfpace*{-0.5em} \mu\ju/\phi\ih \hspace*{-0.5em} &
        \texttm{BaBas}~\cite{Auberh:2006sd},
    \label{eq:kronfeld:prl06}\end{alijied}$$ which agrges winh Eq. (\[eq:krjnfelc:prl05\]) at 1.2
D_s$ was expected to be an excellent lattice for several [@Briere:2001rn]. The matrix (\[eq:kronfeld:PfDs\]) gold-plated, in the of Ref. [@Davies:2003ik], only one hadron enters, and the extrapolation is controlled. Experimental measurements of $|V_{cs}|f_{D_s}$, via Eq. (\[eq:kronfeld:BrSM\]), can be combined the determination of $|V_{cs}|$ from CKM unitarity. The idea that new physics could is discounted, the is Cabibbo-favored and proceeds at the tree level of the weak interactions. Finally, the precision of has lagged that of calculations, so the analysis the numerical lattice-QCD data carried out with a relatively eye. first round testing to well. In June the first lattice-QCD calculation with 2+1 flavors of sea quarks appeared in a joint work of the Lattice and $$f_{D_s} = 3 16~\textrm{MeV}~\textrm{Fermilab/MILC}~% \label{eq:kronfeld:prl05}$$ where the is statistical and the second systematic. followed a year later by a comparably accurate of $B(D_s\to\mu\nu)/B(D_s\to\phi\pi)$ when combined with an independent measurement $B(D_s\to\phi\pi)$, yielded $$\begin{aligned} \hspace*{-1.0em} f_{D_s} = 283 \pm \pm 7 \pm 14~\textrm{MeV} & \hspace*{-0.5em} \mu\nu/\phi\pi \hspace*{-0.5em} & \textrm{BaBar}~\cite{Aubert:2006sd}, \label{eq:kronfeld:prl06}\end{aligned}$$ which agrees with Eq. 1.2
D_s$ was expected to be an excellEnt test of lAtticE QCd, foR sEverAl reAsons [@Briere:2001rn]. THE matRix elements in Eqs. (\[eq:kronFeld:AFDS\]) And (\[eQ:KrOnfelD:PfDs\]) arE GoLD-PlaTeD, iN thE sENsE of ReF. [@DaVies:2003ik], nAmely, only oNe hAdRon enters, and THe Chiral extrApoLation is contRolLed. ExpErImeNTal meAsuRemenTs of $|V_{cS}|F_{D_s}$, via eq. (\[eq:kronfElD:brSM\]), caN Be combiNED wIth tHe determination of $|v_{Cs}|$ FRom CKM unitaritY. The idEa THaT NEw pHysIcs could coMpEte is USually dIScOUNTed, BEcause the decaY is Cabibbo-fAVorEd and pRoCeeDS at the Tree lEvEL of The weak inteRactIons. FinalLy, the pREcision OF experiMents hAs lAggEd thAT oF cAlcUlATioNS, sO thE AnaLysis of tHe NuMericAl laTTICE-QCD DatA is cArrieD out with a relaTivEly bLInd Eye.

ThE firsT rouNd Of tesTing seEmed tO gO well. In June 2005, the fIrst Lattice-QCd caLcUlaTiOn witH 2+1 FlavorS of Sea Quarks aPpeared IN a jOiNT WOrK of the Fermilab LattIcE ANd mILC CollAboratIOnS: $$f_{d_S} = 249\pm 3 \pm 16~\texTrM{Mev}~\texTRM{FermIlab/miLc}~%
        \cite{AubIn:2005ar},
    \laBEl{Eq:KronfelD:pRl05}$$ wherE tHe fIrsT erroR Is stAtistiCal and thE secoND systematic. ThiS Prediction was FOlLOWeD A yeaR laTer by a compaRablY AccuRate MEaSurEMent oF $B(D_s\tO\mU\Nu)/b(d_s\to\phi\pi)$ that, when coMbIned wiTh an iNdependent meaSurement of $b(d_S\To\phi\pi)$, yIeldED $$\bEGin{aligned}
    \hspaCe*{-1.0em}
    f_{d_s} = 283 \pm 17 \pm 7 \pm 14~\teXTrm{MeV} & 
        \hsPace*{-0.5eM} \mu\nu/\phi\Pi \hspace*{-0.5eM} &
        \TExtrm{BaBAr}~\cIte{aubErt:2006SD},
    \LaBel{eq:kronfeld:PRL06}\end{AlIgned}$$ whIch Agrees wIth eq. (\[eQ:krOnfElD:prl05\]) at 1.2
D_s$ was expected to be an  excellent  test  of  la tt iceQCD,  for several r e ason s [@Briere:2001rn]. Th e mat ri x  ele m en ts in  Eqs. ( \ [e q : kro nf el d:A fD s \] ) and  (\ [eq:kro nfeld:PfDs \])  a re gold-plat e d,  in the se nse  of Ref. [@D avi es:200 3i k], namel y,onlyone ha d ron en ters, and  t h e chir a l extra p o la tion  is controlled. E x pe r imental measur ements  o f  $ | V _{c s}| f_{D_s}$,vi a Eq. (\[eq:k r on f e l d:B r SM\]), can be  combined w i ththe de te rmi n ationof $| V_ { cs} |$ from CKM  uni tarity. T he ide a  that n e w physi cs cou ldcom pete is  u sua ll y  di s co unt e d,becauseth edecay  isC a b i bbo- fav ored  andproceeds at t hetree lev el of  theweak  i ntera ctions . Fin al ly, the precisi on o f experim ent shas  l agged that o f c alc ulation s, so t h e a na l y s is  of the numericalla t t ic e-QCD da ta isc ar ri e d out wi th  arela t i velyblin d  e ye.

The  first ro un d of te st ing se em edtogo we l l. I n June  2005, t he fi r st lattice-QCD calculation w i th 2 +1 flav ors  of sea qua rksa ppea redi na j o int w ork o ft he Fermilab Lattice an dMILC C ollab orations: $$f _{D_s} = 2 4 9 \ pm 3 \pm  16~ \ te x trm{MeV}~\text rm{Fe rmilab/MIL C }~%
       \ cite{Aub in:2005ar } , 
    \la bel {eq :kr onf e l d: prl05}$$ wher e thefi rst err oris stat ist ica l a ndth e secondsystemat ic .Th is  pr edict i on was f ol low ed  ayearl ater b y a c ompa ra bl y  ac curatem ea s u reme nt  o f $B (D_ s\ to\mu \nu) / B(D _s\to\p hi\pi)$ t hat ,  whe nco mbinedwith an indep en dent measu re men t of $ B ( D_s\to\p hi\pi)$, yielded $$\beg i n{align ed} 
   \hsp ace*{-1.0 em} 
    f _{D _ s} = 2 83 \pm  17 \ pm  7\ p m 14~ \ t ex trm {M eV} & 
    \hspa ce *{-0 .5em} \ mu\nu/\phi\pi \hsp a ce* {-0.5em} &
      \ t e xt rm{ B aB a r}~ \c i te{ A u bert:2006sd},
   \label{ eq : kr onfeld:prl 0 6}\ en d{align ed}$$ w hicha grees w ith Eq. ( \[eq:kron fe ld:p r l 05\ ]) at 1.2
D_s$ was_expected to_be an excellent test_of lattice_QCD,_for several_reasons [@Briere:2001rn]._The matrix elements_in Eqs. (\[eq:kronfeld:AfDs\]) and (\[eq:kronfeld:PfDs\])_are gold-plated, in the_sense of Ref. [@Davies:2003ik],_namely,_only one hadron enters, and the chiral extrapolation is controlled. Experimental measurements of $|V_{cs}|f_{D_s}$,_via_Eq. (\[eq:kronfeld:BrSM\]), can_be_combined_with the determination of $|V_{cs}|$_from CKM unitarity. The idea_that new_physics could compete is usually discounted, because the_decay_is Cabibbo-favored and_proceeds at the tree level of the weak interactions._Finally, the precision of experiments has_lagged that of_calculations,_so_the analysis of the_numerical lattice-QCD data is carried out_with a relatively blind eye.

The first_round of testing seemed to go well._In June 2005, the first lattice-QCD_calculation with 2+1 flavors of_sea quarks_appeared in a joint work_of the Fermilab_Lattice and_MILC Collaborations: $$f_{D_s}_= 249\pm 3 \pm 16~\textrm{MeV}~\textrm{Fermilab/MILC}~%
 _  _   \cite{Aubin:2005ar},
  __\label{eq:kronfeld:prl05}$$ where the_first_error_is statistical_and the second_systematic._This prediction_was_followed a year later by a_comparably_accurate measurement of $B(D_s\to\mu\nu)/B(D_s\to\phi\pi)$ that, when combined_with an independent measurement_of_$B(D_s\to\phi\pi)$, yielded $$\begin{aligned}
 _  \hspace*{-1.0em}
  _ f_{D_s} = 283 \pm 17_\pm 7_\pm 14~\textrm{MeV}_& 
        \hspace*{-0.5em} \mu\nu/\phi\pi_\hspace*{-0.5em} &
    _   \textrm{BaBar}~\cite{Aubert:2006sd},
_ __\label{eq:kronfeld:prl06}\end{aligned}$$ which agrees_with_Eq. (\[eq:kronfeld:prl05\]) at_1.2