beta
\left(1-\frac{1}{2}|\boldxi|^2+\frac{3}{8}|\boldxi|^4\right)
\boldsymbol{\mu}_m^{\prime e}-\frac{1}{2}\left(1-\frac{3}{4}|\boldxi|^2
+\frac{5}{8}|\boldxi|^4\right)
\left(\boldxi\times\boldsymbol{\mu}_p^{\prime\tilde{e}}\right)\right].
\end{split}$$

It is shown that intrinsic dipole moments transform like $\left(1-\frac{1}{2}|\boldxi|^2+\frac{3}{8}|\boldxi|^4\right)\approx
1/\operatorgamma$ and the boosted dipole moments transform as $\frac{1}{2}\left(1-\frac{3}{4}|\boldxi|^2+\frac{5}{8}|\boldxi|^4\right)\approx(1-\frac{\operatorgamma}{\operatorgamma+1})$ (see Eq. (\[transgamma\])). Therefore, $(\boldsymbol{\mu}_p^{\prime\tilde{e}})_\mathrm{eff}$ and $(\boldsymbol{\mu}_m^{\prime e})_\mathrm{eff}$ do not form a second rank tensor in the sense that their transformation is not a covariant form like Eq. (\[LTdipole\]), but the following form: $$\begin{split}
&(\boldsymbol{\mu}_p^{\tilde{e}})_\mathrm{eff}
\approx\matrixbeta\frac{1}{\operatorgamma}\boldsymbol{\mu}_p^{\prime\tilde{e}}
+\left(1-\frac{\operatorgamma}{\operatorgamma+1}\right)
\left(\operatorboost\times\boldsymbol{\mu}_m^{\prime e}\right),\\
&(\boldsymbol{\mu}_m^e)_\mathrm{eff}
\approx\matrixbeta\frac{1}{\operatorgamma}\boldsymbol{\mu}_m^{\prime e}
-\left(1-\frac{\operatorgamma}{\operatorgamma+1}\right)
\left(\operatorboost\times\boldsymbol{\mu}_p^{\prime\tilde{e}}\right).\\
\end{split}$$ This implies that an energy caused by dipole moments in the description of Dirac Hamiltonian is not simply the contraction of tensorial dipole density and field tensor: $H_\mathrm{spin}\neq-\boldsymbol{\mu}_p\cdot\mathbf{E}-\
beta 
 \left(1-\frac{1}{2}|\boldxi|^2+\frac{3}{8}|\boldxi|^4\right) 
 \boldsymbol{\mu}_m^{\prime e}-\frac{1}{2}\left(1-\frac{3}{4}|\boldxi|^2 
 + \frac{5}{8}|\boldxi|^4\right) 
 \left(\boldxi\times\boldsymbol{\mu}_p^{\prime\tilde{e}}\right)\right ]. 
 \end{split}$$ 

 It is shown that intrinsic dipole moments transform like $ \left(1-\frac{1}{2}|\boldxi|^2+\frac{3}{8}|\boldxi|^4\right)\approx 
 1/\operatorgamma$ and the boosted dipole here and now translate as $ \frac{1}{2}\left(1-\frac{3}{4}|\boldxi|^2+\frac{5}{8}|\boldxi|^4\right)\approx(1-\frac{\operatorgamma}{\operatorgamma+1})$ (see Eq.   (\[transgamma\ ]) ). Therefore, $ (\boldsymbol{\mu}_p^{\prime\tilde{e}})_\mathrm{eff}$ and $ (\boldsymbol{\mu}_m^{\prime e})_\mathrm{eff}$ do not imprint a second social station tensor in the sense that their transformation is not a covariant form like Eq.   (\[LTdipole\ ]), but the following shape: $ $ \begin{split } 
 & (\boldsymbol{\mu}_p^{\tilde{e}})_\mathrm{eff } 
 \approx\matrixbeta\frac{1}{\operatorgamma}\boldsymbol{\mu}_p^{\prime\tilde{e } } 
 + \left(1-\frac{\operatorgamma}{\operatorgamma+1}\right) 
 \left(\operatorboost\times\boldsymbol{\mu}_m^{\prime e}\right),\\ 
 & (\boldsymbol{\mu}_m^e)_\mathrm{eff } 
 \approx\matrixbeta\frac{1}{\operatorgamma}\boldsymbol{\mu}_m^{\prime einsteinium } 
 -\left(1-\frac{\operatorgamma}{\operatorgamma+1}\right) 
 \left(\operatorboost\times\boldsymbol{\mu}_p^{\prime\tilde{e}}\right).\\ 
 \end{split}$$ This implies that an energy caused by dipole moments in the description of Dirac Hamiltonian is not plainly the contraction of tensorial dipole density and playing field tensor: $ H_\mathrm{spin}\neq-\boldsymbol{\mu}_p\cdot\mathbf{E}-\
betw
\left(1-\frac{1}{2}|\boldxi|^2+\frac{3}{8}|\boldxl|^4\right)
\boldsymbol{\mu}_m^{\primx e}-\frac{1}{2}\meft(1-\frac{3}{4}|\coldxi|^2
+\frac{5}{8}|\boldxi|^4\right)
\left(\bolvxi\tumes\bildsymbol{\mu}_p^{\prime\tilde{d}}\right)\rigjt].
\end{splut}$$

It us shown tizt intrlusic slpole noments transfprm like $\laft(1-\frac{1}{2}|\boldxi|^2+\fsaz{3}{8}|\blldxi|^4\right)\approx
1/\operatorgamma$ and tre boosyef dipole momenjs trsgsfodm as $\frac{1}{2}\left(1-\frac{3}{4}|\boldxi|^2+\frac{5}{8}|\boldxi|^4\dight)\apkrox(1-\frac{\operatorgakma}{\operatorgamma+1})$ (see Eq. (\[trajsgalma\])). Therefore, $(\bolddymbol{\mu}_p^{\prume\tyode{e}})_\mathrm{efw}$ and $(\boldsymbol{\mu}_m^{\prije e})_\mathrm{eff}$ do not form a secund rcnk tensor un thf sense that theig transformatlpn is tot a cpvariant form kikx Eq. (\[OTdipole\]), but the follmwing form: $$\begin{spjit}
&(\boldsykbkl{\mu}_p^{\tilde{e}})_\mathrm{wfd}
\apprmx\madrixcwta\wrad{1}{\o'erztorgalma}\uoldsymbol{\mh}_p^{\prime\tildw{e}}
+\left(1-\frac{\operatorgsmiq}{\operatorgammz+1}\right)
\jest(\operatorboost\times\boldsymbol{\mu}_m^{\prime t}\righf),\\
&(\boldsymbol{\mu}_m^e)_\mathrm{efd}
\approx\matrixbeta\frac{1}{\lperatorgwmma}\boldsymbol{\mu}_m^{\prime e}
-\left(1-\frac{\operatorgamma}{\operdtorgemoa+1}\rnnmt)
\lewr(\ooeratorboost\times\boldsymbol{\mu}_p^{\prime\tilde{e}}\righe).\\
\snc{silit}$$ This implies that an enrrhy saused by dipule momenfs in the descriptlon of Qirac Hamiltonyan os not simply the contractiin of tensorpal eipole density and field tensur: $H_\kathrk{spin}\neq-\boldsymbol{\mu}_p\cdut\mafhbf{E}-\
beta \left(1-\frac{1}{2}|\boldxi|^2+\frac{3}{8}|\boldxi|^4\right) \boldsymbol{\mu}_m^{\prime e}-\frac{1}{2}\left(1-\frac{3}{4}|\boldxi|^2 +\frac{5}{8}|\boldxi|^4\right) \left(\boldxi\times\boldsymbol{\mu}_p^{\prime\tilde{e}}\right)\right]. \end{split}$$ shown intrinsic dipole transform like $\left(1-\frac{1}{2}|\boldxi|^2+\frac{3}{8}|\boldxi|^4\right)\approx moments as $\frac{1}{2}\left(1-\frac{3}{4}|\boldxi|^2+\frac{5}{8}|\boldxi|^4\right)\approx(1-\frac{\operatorgamma}{\operatorgamma+1})$ (see (\[transgamma\])). Therefore, $(\boldsymbol{\mu}_p^{\prime\tilde{e}})_\mathrm{eff}$ $(\boldsymbol{\mu}_m^{\prime e})_\mathrm{eff}$ do not form a rank tensor in the sense that their transformation is not a covariant form Eq. (\[LTdipole\]), but the following form: $$\begin{split} &(\boldsymbol{\mu}_p^{\tilde{e}})_\mathrm{eff} \approx\matrixbeta\frac{1}{\operatorgamma}\boldsymbol{\mu}_p^{\prime\tilde{e}} +\left(1-\frac{\operatorgamma}{\operatorgamma+1}\right) \left(\operatorboost\times\boldsymbol{\mu}_m^{\prime e}\right),\\ &(\boldsymbol{\mu}_m^e)_\mathrm{eff} e} \left(\operatorboost\times\boldsymbol{\mu}_p^{\prime\tilde{e}}\right).\\ This that an energy caused by dipole moments in the description of Dirac Hamiltonian is not simply contraction of tensorial dipole density and field tensor:
beta
\left(1-\frac{1}{2}|\boldxi|^2+\frac{3}{8}|\bolDxi|^4\right)
\boLdsymBol{\Mu}_m^{\PrIme e}-\Frac{1}{2}\Left(1-\frac{3}{4}|\boldxi|^2
+\FRac{5}{8}|\bOldxi|^4\right)
\left(\boldxi\tiMes\boLdSYmboL{\Mu}_P^{\primE\tilde{e}}\RIgHT)\RigHt].
\EnD{spLiT}$$

it Is shoWn tHat intrInsic dipolE moMeNts transform LIkE $\left(1-\frac{1}{2}|\bOldXi|^2+\frac{3}{8}|\boldxi|^4\RigHt)\apprOx
1/\OpeRAtorgAmmA$ and tHe boosTEd dipoLe moments TrANsform AS $\frac{1}{2}\leFT(1-\FrAc{3}{4}|\boLdxi|^2+\frac{5}{8}|\boldxi|^4\rigHT)\aPProx(1-\frac{\operatOrgammA}{\oPErATOrgAmmA+1})$ (see Eq. (\[tranSgAmma\])). THErefore, $(\BOlDSYMboL{\Mu}_p^{\prime\tilde{E}})_\mathrm{eff}$ aND $(\boLdsymbOl{\Mu}_m^{\PRime e})_\mAthrm{EfF}$ Do nOt form a secoNd raNk tensor iN the seNSe that tHEir tranSformaTioN is Not a COvArIanT fORm lIKe eq. (\[LtDipOle\]), but thE fOlLowinG forM: $$\BEGIn{spLit}
&(\BoldSymboL{\mu}_p^{\tilde{e}})_\matHrm{Eff}
\aPProX\matrIxbetA\fraC{1}{\oPeratOrgammA}\boldSyMbol{\mu}_p^{\prime\tilDe{e}}
+\lEft(1-\frac{\opEraToRgaMmA}{\operATorgamMa+1}\rIghT)
\left(\opEratorbOOst\TiMES\BoLdsymbol{\mu}_m^{\prime e}\rIgHT),\\
&(\BoLdsymbol{\Mu}_m^e)_\maTHrM{eFF}
\approx\mAtRixBeta\FRAc{1}{\opeRatoRGaMma}\boldsYmbol{\mU}_M^{\pRiMe e}
-\left(1-\FrAc{\operAtOrgAmmA}{\operATorgAmma+1}\riGht)
\left(\oPeratORboost\times\bolDSymbol{\mu}_p^{\primE\TiLDE{e}}\RIght).\\
\End{Split}$$ This imPlieS That An enERgY caUSed by DipolE mOMeNTs in the description oF DIrac HaMiltoNian is not simpLy the contrACTIon of tenSoriAL dIPole density and Field Tensor: $H_\matHRm{spin}\neQ-\boldSymbol{\mu}_P\cdot\mathBF{e}-\
beta
\left(1-\frac{1}{2}|\ boldxi|^2+ \frac {3} {8} |\ bold xi|^ 4\right)
\bold s ymbo l{\mu}_m^{\prime e}-\f rac{1 }{ 2 }\le f t( 1-\fr ac{3}{4 } |\ b o ldx i| ^2 
+\ fr a c{ 5}{8} |\b oldxi|^ 4\right)
\ lef t( \boldxi\time s \b oldsymbol{ \mu }_p^{\prime\ til de{e}} \r igh t )\rig ht] .
\en d{spli t }$$

I t is show nt hat in t rinsicd i po le m oments transforml ik e  $\left(1-\fra c{1}{2 }| \ bo l d xi| ^2+ \frac{3}{8 }| \bold x i|^4\ri g ht ) \ a ppr o x
1/\operator gamma$ andt hebooste ddip o le mom entstr a nsf orm as $\fr ac{1 }{2}\left (1-\fr a c{3}{4} | \boldxi |^2+\f rac {5} {8}| \ bo ld xi| ^4 \ rig h t) \ap p rox (1-\frac {\ op erato rgam m a } { \ope rat orga mma+1 })$ (see Eq.(\[ tran s gam ma\]) ). Th eref or e, $( \bolds ymbol {\ mu}_p^{\prime\t ilde {e}})_\ma thr m{ eff }$  and$ (\bold sym bol {\mu}_m ^{\prim e  e} )_ \ m a th rm{eff}$ do not fo rm a  s econd ra nk ten s or  i n  the sen se  th at t h e ir tr ansf o rm ation is  not a co va riant f or m like  E q.(\[ LTdip o le\] ), but  the fol lowin g  form: $$\begi n {split}
&(\bo l ds y m bo l {\mu }_p ^{\tilde{e} })_\ m athr m{ef f }\ap p rox\m atrix be t a\ f rac{1}{\operatorgam ma }\bold symbo l{\mu}_p^{\pr ime\tilde{ e } } 
+\left( 1-\f r ac { \operatorgamma }{\op eratorgamm a +1}\righ t)
\l eft(\ope ratorboos t \ times\bo lds ymb ol{ \mu } _ m^ {\prime e}\ri g h t),\ \&(\bold sym bol{\mu }_m ^e) _\m ath rm {eff}
\ap prox\mat ri xb et a\ fra c{1}{ \ operator ga mma }\ bol dsymb o l{\mu} _m^{\ prim ee} -\l eft(1-\ f ra c { \ope ra to rgam ma} {\ opera torg a mma +1}\rig ht)
\left (\o p erat or bo ost\tim es\boldsymbol {\ mu}_p^{\pr im e\t ilde{e } } \right). \\
\end{split}$$ This i m plies t hat  an e nerg y causedbydipole  mo m ents i n thedescr ip tio n of Di r a cHam il tonian isn o t s imply  t he c ontract ion of tensorial d i pol e density and  fi eldt e ns or: $H _ \ma th r m{s p i n}\neq-\boldsym bol{\mu}_p \c d ot \mathbf{E} - \
beta
\left(1-\frac{1}{2}|\boldxi|^2+\frac{3}{8}|\boldxi|^4\right)
\boldsymbol{\mu}_m^{\prime e}-\frac{1}{2}\left(1-\frac{3}{4}|\boldxi|^2
+\frac{5}{8}|\boldxi|^4\right)
\left(\boldxi\times\boldsymbol{\mu}_p^{\prime\tilde{e}}\right)\right].
\end{split}$$

It_is shown_that intrinsic dipole moments_transform like_$\left(1-\frac{1}{2}|\boldxi|^2+\frac{3}{8}|\boldxi|^4\right)\approx
1/\operatorgamma$_and the_boosted_dipole moments transform_as $\frac{1}{2}\left(1-\frac{3}{4}|\boldxi|^2+\frac{5}{8}|\boldxi|^4\right)\approx(1-\frac{\operatorgamma}{\operatorgamma+1})$ (see_Eq. (\[transgamma\])). Therefore, $(\boldsymbol{\mu}_p^{\prime\tilde{e}})_\mathrm{eff}$ and_$(\boldsymbol{\mu}_m^{\prime e})_\mathrm{eff}$ do_not_form a second rank tensor in the sense that their transformation is not a_covariant_form like_Eq. (\[LTdipole\]),_but_the following form: $$\begin{split}
&(\boldsymbol{\mu}_p^{\tilde{e}})_\mathrm{eff}
\approx\matrixbeta\frac{1}{\operatorgamma}\boldsymbol{\mu}_p^{\prime\tilde{e}}
+\left(1-\frac{\operatorgamma}{\operatorgamma+1}\right)
\left(\operatorboost\times\boldsymbol{\mu}_m^{\prime e}\right),\\
&(\boldsymbol{\mu}_m^e)_\mathrm{eff}
\approx\matrixbeta\frac{1}{\operatorgamma}\boldsymbol{\mu}_m^{\prime_e}
-\left(1-\frac{\operatorgamma}{\operatorgamma+1}\right)
\left(\operatorboost\times\boldsymbol{\mu}_p^{\prime\tilde{e}}\right).\\
\end{split}$$ This implies that an_energy caused_by dipole moments in the description of Dirac_Hamiltonian_is not simply_the contraction of tensorial dipole density and field tensor:_$H_\mathrm{spin}\neq-\boldsymbol{\mu}_p\cdot\mathbf{E}-\