big{]}$.

Recall that $f_\omega (0)>0$ for all $\omega$, and $f_\omega (x)$ has a local minima at: $$x_0 = \frac{\omega [1-W_0(\alpha)]}{2LN}.$$ When $\omega=\omega_0$, denote this local minima as $x_0=a$ and $f_{\omega_0} (a)=0$. From (\[Eq23\]), we have: $$a=\frac{ \omega_0 [1-W_0 (\alpha)]}{2LN} =-\frac{W_0(\alpha)}{1-W_0(\alpha)} > 0.$$ For a fixed $x$, taking the derivative of (\[EqA2\]) with respect to $\omega$, we obtain: $$g'_x (\omega) = \frac{\partial F (x, \omega)}{\partial \omega} = -\frac{2LNx^2}{\omega ^2}e^{-\frac{2LN}{\omega}x} <0.$$ Thus, the function $g_x (\omega)$ is monotonically decreasing with respect to $\omega$, for any fixed $x$. In particular, when $\omega_0 < \omega_{-1} < \omega$, we have: $$g_{x=a} (\omega)< g_{x=a} (\omega_0) = F (a, \omega_0) = f_{\omega_0} (a) =0,$$ which, however, implies: $$\label{EqA9}
  f_{\omega} (a) = F (a, \omega) = g_{x=a} (\omega) < 0.$$ Since we know $f_\omega (0)>0$, it follows from (\[EqA9\]) that the unique real root of $f_\omega (x)=0$ must lie in the interval $[0,a]= [ 0,-\frac{W_0 (\alpha)}{(1-W_0(\alpha)} ]$, as illustrated in Fig. \[figA2\].

[^1]: This work was supported by the National Science Foundation of China under Grants 61271215, 61001074, 61172065, 61071080, and 60825103, in part by Qualcomm Corporation Foundation, in part by the 973 program (2010CB328205, 2010CB328204), and in part by Shanghai 09XD1402200.

big{]}$. 

 Recall that $ f_\omega (0)>0 $ for all $ \omega$, and $ f_\omega (x)$ has a local minima at: $ $ x_0 = \frac{\omega [ 1 - W_0(\alpha)]}{2LN}.$$ When $ \omega=\omega_0 $, denote this local minima as $ x_0 = a$ and $ f_{\omega_0 } (a)=0$. From (\[Eq23\ ]), we have: $ $ a=\frac { \omega_0 [ 1 - W_0 (\alpha)]}{2LN } = -\frac{W_0(\alpha)}{1 - W_0(\alpha) } > 0.$$ For a fixed $ x$, taking the derived function of (\[EqA2\ ]) with obedience to $ \omega$, we obtain: $ $ g'_x (\omega) = \frac{\partial F (x, \omega)}{\partial \omega } = -\frac{2LNx^2}{\omega ^2}e^{-\frac{2LN}{\omega}x } < 0.$$ Thus, the function $ g_x (\omega)$ is monotonically decrease with respect to $ \omega$, for any fixed $ x$. In finical, when $ \omega_0 < \omega_{-1 } < \omega$, we give birth: $ $ g_{x = a } (\omega) < g_{x = a } (\omega_0) = F (a, \omega_0) = f_{\omega_0 } (a) = 0,$$ which, however, implies: $ $ \label{EqA9 } 
   f_{\omega } (a) = F (a, \omega) = g_{x = a } (\omega) < 0.$$ Since we know $ f_\omega (0)>0 $, it follows from (\[EqA9\ ]) that the unique veridical root of $ f_\omega (x)=0 $ must lie in the time interval $ [ 0,a]= [ 0,-\frac{W_0 (\alpha)}{(1 - W_0(\alpha) } ] $, as illustrated in Fig. \[figA2\ ]. 

 [ ^1 ]: This work was back by the National Science Foundation of China under Grants 61271215, 61001074, 61172065, 61071080, and 60825103, in part by Qualcomm Corporation Foundation, in part by the 973 plan (2010CB328205, 2010CB328204), and in part by Shanghai 09XD1402200.
big{]}$.

Gecall that $f_\omega (0)>0$ for xll $\omega$, and $f_\omega (x)$ has a local mknima at: $$x_0 = \frac{\omega [1-W_0(\alpha)]}{2PN}.$$ When $\omega=\omega_0$, denote thir local mpnima as $z_0=a$ aid $f_{\omega_0} (a)=0$. From (\[Eq23\]), we have: $$a=\fdwc{ \okxga_0 [1-W_0 (\alpha)]}{2LN} =-\ftac{W_0(\alpha)}{1-W_0(\al[ha)} > 0.$$ For a fifea $r$, taking the derivative of (\[EqA2\]) with wespect tl $\omega$, we obtwin: $$b'_v (\omsga) = \frac{\partial F (x, \omega)}{\partial \kmega} = -\hrac{2LNx^2}{\omega ^2}e^{-\ftac{2LN}{\omega}x} <0.$$ Thus, the funchion $g_x (\omega)$ is monotlnically dexreafung with resoect to $\omtgc$, for any fjxed $x$. In particular, when $\omega_0 < \omeya_{-1} < \omega$, wg gagg: $$g_{x=a} (\omega)< j_{x=a} (\omvga_0) = F (a, \omega_0) = f_{\omegd_0} (a) =0,$$ whoch, however, imilies: $$\lavel{EqA9}
  f_{\omega} (a) = F (a, \omega) = g_{x=a} (\omega) < 0.$$ Since wa inow $f_\omega (0)>0$, it filoows xrom (\[EqA9\]) rhag tge uhique geam root of $r_\omega (x)=0$ muwt lie in the interfaj $[0,a]= [ 0,-\frac{W_0 (\alpga)}{(1-W_0(\alpra)} ]$, as illustrated in Fig. \[figA2\].

[^1]: This work fas supported by the Natiobal Science Foundatioj of Chinw under Grants 61271215, 61001074, 61172065, 61071080, and 60825103, in part by Qualcomm Corposatioi Wouueatiov, ij part by the 973 program (2010CB328205, 2010CB328204), and in part by Srznbhsi 09XD1402200.

big{]}$. Recall that $f_\omega (0)>0$ for all $f_\omega has a minima at: $$x_0 denote local minima as and $f_{\omega_0} (a)=0$. (\[Eq23\]), we have: $$a=\frac{ \omega_0 [1-W_0 =-\frac{W_0(\alpha)}{1-W_0(\alpha)} > 0.$$ For a fixed $x$, taking the derivative of (\[EqA2\]) with to $\omega$, we obtain: $$g'_x (\omega) = \frac{\partial F (x, \omega)}{\partial \omega} = ^2}e^{-\frac{2LN}{\omega}x} Thus, function (\omega)$ is monotonically decreasing with respect to $\omega$, for any fixed $x$. In particular, when $\omega_0 \omega_{-1} < \omega$, we have: $$g_{x=a} (\omega)< g_{x=a} = F (a, \omega_0) f_{\omega_0} (a) =0,$$ which, however, $$\label{EqA9} (a) = (a, = (\omega) < 0.$$ we know $f_\omega (0)>0$, it follows from (\[EqA9\]) that the unique real root of $f_\omega (x)=0$ must in the [ 0,-\frac{W_0 ]$, illustrated Fig. \[figA2\]. [^1]: was supported by the National Science under Grants 61271215, 61001074, 61172065, 61071080, and 60825103, part by Corporation Foundation, in part by the program (2010CB328205, 2010CB328204), and in part by Shanghai
big{]}$.

Recall that $f_\omega (0)>0$ for all $\Omega$, and $f_\oMega (x)$ Has A loCaL minIma aT: $$x_0 = \frac{\omega [1-W_0(\alPHa)]}{2LN}.$$ when $\omega=\omega_0$, denote thIs locAl MInimA As $X_0=a$ and $F_{\omega_0} (a)=0$. fRoM (\[eQ23\]), we HaVe: $$A=\frAc{ \OMeGa_0 [1-W_0 (\alPha)]}{2lN} =-\frac{W_0(\Alpha)}{1-W_0(\alphA)} > 0.$$ FoR a Fixed $x$, taking THe Derivative Of (\[EQA2\]) with respecT to $\Omega$, wE oBtaIN: $$g'_x (\omEga) = \Frac{\pArtial f (X, \omega)}{\Partial \omEgA} = -\Frac{2LNX^2}{\Omega ^2}e^{-\fRAC{2Ln}{\omeGa}x} <0.$$ Thus, the functioN $G_x (\OMega)$ is monotoniCally dEcREaSINg wIth Respect to $\oMeGa$, for ANy fixed $X$. in PARTicULar, when $\omega_0 < \oMega_{-1} < \omega$, we HAve: $$G_{x=a} (\omeGa)< G_{x=a} (\OMega_0) = F (a, \Omega_0) = F_{\oMEga_0} (A) =0,$$ which, howevEr, imPlies: $$\labeL{EqA9}
  f_{\oMEga} (a) = F (a, \oMEga) = g_{x=a} (\oMega) < 0.$$ SiNce We kNow $f_\OMeGa (0)>0$, It fOlLOws FRoM (\[Eqa9\]) ThaT the uniqUe ReAl rooT of $f_\OMEGA (x)=0$ muSt lIe in The inTerval $[0,a]= [ 0,-\frac{W_0 (\aLphA)}{(1-W_0(\alPHa)} ]$, aS illuStratEd in fiG. \[figA2\].

[^1]: this woRk was SuPported by the NatIonaL Science FOunDaTioN oF ChinA Under GRanTs 61271215, 61001074, 61172065, 61071080, aNd 60825103, in parT by QualCOmm coRPORaTion Foundation, in paRt BY ThE 973 program (2010cB328205, 2010CB328204), anD In PaRT by ShangHaI 09XD1402200.

big{]}$.

Recall that $f_\ omega (0)> 0$ fo r a ll$\ omeg a$,and $f_\omega( x)$has a local minima at:  $$x_ 0=  \fr a c{ \omeg a [1-W_ 0 (\ a l pha )] }{ 2LN }. $ $When$\o mega=\o mega_0$, d eno te  this localm in ima as $x_ 0=a $ and $f_{\o meg a_0} ( a) =0$ .  From  (\ [Eq23 \]), w e  have:  $$a=\fra c{ \omega _ 0 [1-W_ 0 (\ alph a)]}{2LN} =-\frac { W_ 0 (\alpha)}{1-W_ 0(\alp ha ) }> 0.$ $ F or a fixed  $ x$, t a king th e  d e r i vat i ve of (\[EqA2 \]) with re s pec t to $ \o meg a $, weobtai n: $$g '_x (\omega ) =\frac{\pa rtialF  (x, \o m ega)}{\ partia l \ ome ga}=  - \f rac {2 L Nx^ 2 }{ \om e ga^2}e^{-\ fr ac {2LN} {\om e g a } x} < 0.$ $ Th us, t he function $ g_x  (\o m ega )$ is  mono toni ca lly d ecreas ing w it h respect to $\ omeg a$, for a nyfi xed  $ x$. I n  parti cul ar,  when $ \omega_ 0  <\o m e g a_ {-1} < \omega$, we  h a v e:  $$g_{x= a} (\o m eg a) <  g_{x=a}  ( \om ega_ 0 )  = F(a,\ om ega_0) =  f_{\o m eg a_ 0} (a)=0 ,$$ wh ic h,how ever, impl ies: $ $\label{ EqA9}   f_{\omega} ( a ) = F (a, \om e ga ) =g _{x= a}(\omega) <0.$$ Sinc e we kn ow$ f_\om ega ( 0) > 0$ ,  it follows from (\ [E qA9\])  that  the unique r eal root o f $ f_\omega  (x) = 0$ must lie in th e int erval $[0, a ]= [ 0,- \frac {W_0 (\a lpha)}{(1 - W _0(\alph a)}  ]$ , a s i l l us trated in Fig . \[fi gA 2\].

[ ^1] : Thiswor k w assup po rted by t he Natio na lSc ie nce  Foun d ation of  C hin aund er Gr a nts 61 27121 5, 6 10 01 0 74,  611720 6 5, 6 1071 08 0,  and  60 82 5103,  inp art  by Qua lcomm Cor por a tion  F ou ndation , in part byth e 973 prog ra m ( 2010CB 3 2 8205, 20 10CB328204), and in par t  by Sha ngh ai 09 XD14 02200.

big{]}$.

Recall that_$f_\omega (0)>0$_for all $\omega$, and_$f_\omega (x)$_has_a local_minima_at: $$x_0 =_\frac{\omega [1-W_0(\alpha)]}{2LN}.$$ When_$\omega=\omega_0$, denote this local_minima as $x_0=a$_and_$f_{\omega_0} (a)=0$. From (\[Eq23\]), we have: $$a=\frac{ \omega_0 [1-W_0 (\alpha)]}{2LN} =-\frac{W_0(\alpha)}{1-W_0(\alpha)} > 0.$$ For_a_fixed $x$,_taking_the_derivative of (\[EqA2\]) with respect_to $\omega$, we obtain: $$g'_x_(\omega) =_\frac{\partial F (x, \omega)}{\partial \omega} = -\frac{2LNx^2}{\omega ^2}e^{-\frac{2LN}{\omega}x}_<0.$$_Thus, the function_$g_x (\omega)$ is monotonically decreasing with respect to $\omega$,_for any fixed $x$. In particular,_when $\omega_0 <_\omega_{-1}_<_\omega$, we have: $$g_{x=a}_(\omega)< g_{x=a} (\omega_0) = F (a,_\omega_0) = f_{\omega_0} (a) =0,$$ which,_however, implies: $$\label{EqA9}
  f_{\omega} (a) =_F (a, \omega) = g_{x=a} (\omega)_< 0.$$ Since we know_$f_\omega (0)>0$,_it follows from (\[EqA9\]) that_the unique real_root of_$f_\omega (x)=0$ must_lie in the interval $[0,a]= [_0,-\frac{W_0 (\alpha)}{(1-W_0(\alpha)} ]$,_as illustrated in Fig. \[figA2\].

[^1]: This_work_was supported by_the_National_Science Foundation_of China under_Grants_61271215, 61001074,_61172065,_61071080, and 60825103, in part by_Qualcomm_Corporation Foundation, in part by the 973_program (2010CB328205, 2010CB328204), and_in_part by Shanghai 09XD1402200.
