 in any theory in which fluctuations in more than one field are important, and it is possible to construct situations where this is the case [@twoperts].

Our analysis is based on the formalism devised by Stewart and Lyth [@SL] to carry out a second-order analytic calculation. We shall not reproduce the derivation of the equations here, instead simply reproducing the important ones.[^1] With the usual notation of $a$ for scale factor, $H$ for Hubble parameter, $\phi$ for the inflationary scalar field and overdot as derivative with respect to cosmic time, they introduce a new quantity $z$ defined by $$\label{z}
z\equiv \frac{a\dot{\phi}}{H} \,.$$ The quantity one desires to calculate is the curvature perturbation ${\cal 
R}$, defined as in Ref. [@SL]. It is convenient to define a related quantity $u$, defined by $$\label{uR}
u = - z {\cal R} \,,$$ which is a gauge invariant potential [@MFB].

A Fourier expansion of $u$ into comoving modes $u_{{\bf k}}$ is carried out, and these can be shown to obey the remarkably simple equation [@Muk; @MFB; @SL] $$\label{ufield}
\frac{d^2 u_{{\bf k}}}{d\tau^2} +\left( k^2 - \frac{1}{z} 
    \frac{d^2 z}{d\tau^2} \right) u_{{\bf k}} =0 \,,$$ where $\tau$ is the conformal time defined by $d\tau = dt/a(t)$ and $k = 
|{\bf k}|$ is the modulus of the wavenumber. Defining the spectrum ${\cal 
P}_{{\cal R}}(k)$ of the curvature perturbation in the standard way as $$\langle {\cal R}_{{\bf k_1}} {\cal R}^*_{{\bf k_2}} \rangle =
    \frac{2\pi^2}{k^3} {\cal P}_{{\cal R}} \delta^{3} \,
    ({\bf k_1}-{\bf k_2}) \,,$$ yields $$\label{pspec}
{\cal P}_{{\cal R}}^{1/2}(k) = \sqrt{\frac{k^3}{2\pi^2}} \, 
    \left| \frac{u_{{\bf k}}}{z}
in any theory in which fluctuations in more than one field are important, and it is potential to manufacture situations where this is the case [ @twoperts ]. 

 Our psychoanalysis is based on the formalism organize by Stewart and Lyth [ @SL ] to carry out a second - holy order analytic calculation. We shall not reproduce the derivation of the equation here, instead simply regurgitate the important ones.[^1 ] With the usual note of $ a$ for scale factor, $ H$ for Hubble parameter, $ \phi$ for the inflationary scalar field and overdot as derivative with respect to cosmic time, they introduce a fresh quantity $ z$ defined by $ $ \label{z } 
 z\equiv \frac{a\dot{\phi}}{H } \,.$$ The quantity one desire to calculate is the curvature perturbation $ { \cal 
 R}$, defined as in Ref.   [ @SL ]. It is commodious to define a related measure $ u$, defined by $ $ \label{uR } 
 u = - z { \cal R } \,,$$ which is a gauge changeless potential [ @MFB ]. 

 A Fourier expansion of $ u$ into comoving modes $ u_{{\bf k}}$ is carried out, and these can be shown to obey the remarkably simple equation [ @Muk; @MFB; @SL ] $ $ \label{ufield } 
 \frac{d^2 u_{{\bf k}}}{d\tau^2 } + \left (k^2 - \frac{1}{z } 
     \frac{d^2 z}{d\tau^2 } \right) u_{{\bf k } } = 0 \,,$$ where $ \tau$ is the conformal time defined by $ d\tau = dt / a(t)$ and $ k = 
 |{\bf k}|$ is the modulus of the wavenumber. Defining the spectrum $ { \cal 
 P}_{{\cal R}}(k)$ of the curvature perturbation in the standard way as $ $ \langle { \cal R}_{{\bf k_1 } } { \cal R}^*_{{\bf k_2 } } \rangle = 
     \frac{2\pi^2}{k^3 } { \cal P}_{{\cal R } } \delta^{3 } \, 
     ({ \bf k_1}-{\bf k_2 }) \,,$$ yields $ $ \label{pspec } 
 { \cal P}_{{\cal R}}^{1/2}(k) = \sqrt{\frac{k^3}{2\pi^2 } } \, 
     \left| \frac{u_{{\bf k}}}{z }
 in any theory in which flugtuations in morg rhan oie fiels are imoortant, and it is possible tl xonsteuct situations where ghis is tje case [@rwoptrts].

Our analysis ma based on ths forkelism devised bi Stewart ang Lyth [@SL] to cdrfy out a second-order analytic calculaeion. We sjall not reproquce ehe svrlvation of the equations here, inatead spmply reproducing the important ones.[^1] With tje udual notation of $a$ for scale dactje, $H$ for Hubbue paramettr, $\phi$ for tge inflationary scalar field ana ovexdot as deruvqtigg with respert to bosmic time, tmvy intrmduce a new quantity $d$ defmned by $$\label{z}
z\equiv \frac{e\dot{\phi}}{H} \,.$$ The quantijy one deshrzs to calculate is thw xurvajure [ertjebagioh ${\ral 
R}$, deflnev as in Ref. [@AL]. It is cobvenient to define s wvkated quantify $u$, dqfyned by $$\label{uR}
u = - z {\cal R} \,,$$ which is a caufe invariant potential [@NFB].

A Fourier expansioj of $u$ ineo comoving modes $u_{{\bf k}}$ is carried out, and these wan bx rhock gi lbey the remarkably simple equation [@Muk; @MFB; @SJ] $$\lsbvl{ufield}
\frac{d^2 u_{{\bf k}}}{d\tau^2} +\left( k^2 - \gtac{1}{z} 
    \frac{d^2 z}{d\tau^2} \rifht) u_{{\bf k}} =0 \,,$$ where $\hau$ is jhe cobformal tyme cefined by $d\tau = dt/a(t)$ and $k = 
|{\bf k}|$ is thv moeulus of the wavenbmber. Definiug the specyrum ${\cal 
P}_{{\cal R}}(k)$ of the curbature pertkrbation jv the standard wxy ss $$\langle {\cal R}_{{\bf k_1}} {\cal R}^*_{{\bf h_2}} \rangle =
    \yrac{2\pi^2}{k^3} {\zal K}_{{\cal R}} \qelta^{3} \,
    ({\hf k_1}-{\bn k_2}) \,,$$ yields $$\label{psoec}
{\cap [}_{{\cal R}}^{1/2}(k) = \sert{\frac{k^3}{2\pi^2}} \, 
    \left| \frac{u_{{\bf k}}}{z}
in any theory in which fluctuations in one are important, it is possible is case [@twoperts]. Our is based on formalism devised by Stewart and Lyth to carry out a second-order analytic calculation. We shall not reproduce the derivation the equations here, instead simply reproducing the important ones.[^1] With the usual notation $a$ scale $H$ Hubble parameter, $\phi$ for the inflationary scalar field and overdot as derivative with respect to cosmic they introduce a new quantity $z$ defined by z\equiv \frac{a\dot{\phi}}{H} \,.$$ The one desires to calculate is curvature ${\cal R}$, as Ref. It is convenient define a related quantity $u$, defined by $$\label{uR} u = - z {\cal R} \,,$$ which is gauge invariant A Fourier of into modes $u_{{\bf k}}$ out, and these can be shown remarkably simple equation [@Muk; @MFB; @SL] $$\label{ufield} \frac{d^2 k}}}{d\tau^2} +\left( - \frac{1}{z} \frac{d^2 z}{d\tau^2} \right) u_{{\bf =0 \,,$$ where $\tau$ is the conformal time by $d\tau = dt/a(t)$ and $k = |{\bf k}|$ is the modulus of the wavenumber. spectrum ${\cal P}_{{\cal R}}(k)$ the curvature perturbation the way $$\langle R}_{{\bf k_1}} R}^*_{{\bf k_2}} \rangle = \frac{2\pi^2}{k^3} {\cal P}_{{\cal R}} \delta^{3} \, ({\bf k_2}) \,,$$ yields $$\label{pspec} {\cal P}_{{\cal R}}^{1/2}(k) = \sqrt{\frac{k^3}{2\pi^2}} \, k}}}{z}
 in any theory in which fluctuaTions in morE than One FieLd Are iMporTant, and it is posSIble To construct situations wHere tHiS Is thE CaSe [@twoPerts].

OuR AnALYsiS iS bAseD oN ThE formAliSm devisEd by StewarT anD LYth [@SL] to carry OUt A second-ordEr aNalytic calcuLatIon. We sHaLl nOT reprOduCe the DerivaTIon of tHe equatioNs HEre, insTEad simpLY ReProdUcing the important ONeS.[^1] with the usual noTation Of $A$ FoR SCalE faCtor, $H$ for HuBbLe parAMeter, $\phI$ FoR THE inFLationary scalAr field and oVErdOt as deRiVatIVe with RespeCt TO coSmic time, theY intRoduce a neW quantITy $z$ defiNEd by $$\labEl{z}
z\eqUiv \FraC{a\doT{\PhI}}{H} \,.$$ the QuANtiTY oNe dESirEs to calcUlAtE is thE curVATURe peRtuRbatIon ${\caL 
R}$, defined as in ref. [@sL]. It IS coNveniEnt to DefiNe A relaTed quaNtity $U$, dEfined by $$\label{uR}
U = - z {\caL R} \,,$$ which is A gaUgE inVaRiant POtentiAl [@MfB].

A fourier ExpansiON of $U$ iNTO CoMoving modes $u_{{\bf k}}$ is cArRIEd Out, and thEse can BE sHoWN to obey tHe RemArkaBLY simpLe eqUAtIon [@Muk; @MFb; @SL] $$\labEL{uFiEld}
\frac{D^2 u_{{\Bf k}}}{d\taU^2} +\lEft( K^2 - \frAc{1}{z} 
    \frAC{d^2 z}{d\Tau^2} \rigHt) u_{{\bf k}} =0 \,,$$ whEre $\taU$ Is the conformal TIme defined by $d\TAu = DT/A(t)$ ANd $k = 
|{\bF k}|$ iS the modulus Of thE WaveNumbER. DEfiNIng thE specTrUM ${\cAL 
P}_{{\cal R}}(k)$ of the curvatuRe PerturBatioN in the standarD way as $$\langLE {\CAl R}_{{\bf k_1}} {\caL R}^*_{{\bf K_2}} \RaNGle =
    \frac{2\pi^2}{k^3} {\cal P}_{{\Cal R}} \dElta^{3} \,
    ({\bf k_1}-{\bf k_2}) \,,$$ YIelds $$\labEl{pspEc}
{\cal P}_{{\caL R}}^{1/2}(k) = \sqrt{\frAC{K^3}{2\pi^2}} \, 
    \left| \fRac{U_{{\bf K}}}{z}
 in any theory in which fl uctuations  in m ore  th an  one  fie ld are importa n t, a nd it is possible to c onstr uc t  sit u at ionswhere t h is i s t he  c ase  [ @ tw opert s]. 

Our a nalysis is  ba se d on the for m al ism devise d b y Stewart an d L yth [@ SL ] t o  carr y o ut asecond - orderanalyticca l culati o n. We s h a ll  not  reproduce the de r iv a tion of the eq uation sh er e ,  in ste ad simplyre produ c ing the im p o r tan t  ones.[^1] Wi th the usua l  no tation  o f $ a $ forscale  f a cto r, $H$ forHubb le parame ter, $ \ phi$ fo r  the in flatio nar y s cala r  f ie ldan d  ov e rd ota s d erivativ ewi th re spec t t o  cos mic  tim e, th ey introducea n ew q u ant ity $ z$ de fine dby $$ \label {z}
z \e quiv \frac{a\do t{\p hi}}{H} \ ,.$ $The  q uanti t y onedes ire s to ca lculate isth e c ur vature perturbatio n$ { \c al 
R}$,  defin e das in Ref.[@ SL] . It i s con veni e nt  to defi ne a r e la te d quant it y $u$,  d efi ned  by $ $ \lab el{uR} 
u = - z  {\ca l  R} \,,$$ whic h  is a gauge i n va r i an t  pot ent ial [@MFB]. 

AF ouri er e x pa nsi o n of$u$ i nt o  c o moving modes $u_{{\ bf  k}}$is ca rried out, an d these ca n b e shownto o b ey the remarkably  simp le equatio n  [@Muk;@MFB;  @SL] $$ \label{uf i e ld}
\fra c{d ^2u_{ {\b f k} }}{d\tau^2} + \ l eft(  k ^2 - \f rac {1}{z}
   \ fra c{d ^2  z}{d\tau ^2} \rig ht )u_ {{ \bf  k}}= 0 \,,$$wh ere  $ \ta u$ is the co nform al t im ed efi ned by$ d\ t a u =dt /a (t)$  an d$k =
|{\ b f k }|$ isthe modul uso f th ewa venumbe r. Defining t he  spectrum${ \ca l 
P}_ { { \cal R}} (k)$ of the curvature p e rturbat ion  in t he s tandard w ayas $$\ lan g le {\c al R}_ {{\bf  k _1} } {\cal R }^ *_{ {\ bf k_2}} \ r a ngl e =
  \fr ac{2\pi ^2}{k^3} {\cal P}_ { {\c al R}} \delta ^{3 } \,   ({ \ bf k_1 }- { \bf k _2}) \,,$$ yiel ds $$\labe l{ p sp ec}
{\calP }_{ {\ cal R}} ^{1/2}( k) =\ sqrt{\f rac{k^3}{ 2\pi^2}}\,  
 \le ft| \frac{ u_{{\bfk}}}{z}
 in_any theory_in which fluctuations in_more than_one_field are_important,_and it is_possible to construct_situations where this is_the case [@twoperts].

Our_analysis_is based on the formalism devised by Stewart and Lyth [@SL] to carry out_a_second-order analytic_calculation._We_shall not reproduce the derivation_of the equations here, instead_simply reproducing_the important ones.[^1] With the usual notation of_$a$_for scale factor,_$H$ for Hubble parameter, $\phi$ for the inflationary scalar_field and overdot as derivative with_respect to cosmic_time,_they_introduce a new quantity_$z$ defined by $$\label{z}
z\equiv \frac{a\dot{\phi}}{H} \,.$$_The quantity one desires to calculate_is the curvature perturbation ${\cal 
R}$, defined_as in Ref. [@SL]. It is convenient_to define a related quantity_$u$, defined_by $$\label{uR}
u = - z_{\cal R} \,,$$_which is_a gauge invariant_potential [@MFB].

A Fourier expansion of $u$_into comoving modes_$u_{{\bf k}}$ is carried out, and_these_can be shown_to_obey_the remarkably_simple equation [@Muk;_@MFB;_@SL] $$\label{ufield}
\frac{d^2_u_{{\bf_k}}}{d\tau^2} +\left( k^2 - \frac{1}{z} 
__  \frac{d^2 z}{d\tau^2} \right) u_{{\bf k}}_=0 \,,$$ where $\tau$_is_the conformal time defined_by $d\tau = dt/a(t)$ and_$k = 
|{\bf k}|$ is the_modulus of_the wavenumber._Defining the spectrum ${\cal 
P}_{{\cal R}}(k)$ of the curvature perturbation in_the standard way as $$\langle {\cal_R}_{{\bf k_1}} {\cal R}^*_{{\bf_k_2}} \rangle_=
_  _\frac{2\pi^2}{k^3}_{\cal P}_{{\cal_R}} \delta^{3} \,
    ({\bf_k_1}-{\bf k_2})_\,,$$ yields $$\label{pspec}
{\cal P}_{{\cal R}}^{1/2}(k) =_\sqrt{\frac{k^3}{2\pi^2}} \, 
 __ \left| \frac{u_{{\bf k}}}{z}