bm \psi, \bm \tau, \bm \beta)$ is defined as the corresponding optimization objective.

Denote the estimates of the complex gain, the AoA, and the path delay at the $n$th iteration as $\bm \beta^{(n)} $, $\bm \psi^{(n)} $, and $\bm \tau^{(n)} $, respectively. Utilizing the majorization-minorization (MM) iterative approach [@log-sum-2; @log-sum-3] and similar to [@SFW-BS-GC], the optimization in can be transformed into minimizing the surrogate function as $$\begin{aligned}
\min_{\bm \psi, \bm \tau } \
\underbrace{
- \mathbf y_k^H \mathbf W^H \mathbf P_k (\bm \psi, \bm \tau) \Big(
\mathbf P_k^H (\bm \psi, \bm \tau) \mathbf W \, \mathbf W^H\mathbf P_k (\bm \psi, \bm \tau)
+ \lambda ^{-1} \mathbf D^{(n)}
\Big)^{-1} \mathbf P_k^H (\bm \psi, \bm \tau) \mathbf W\mathbf y_k
+
C(\bm \beta^{(n)})
}_{S_1 (\bm \psi, \bm \tau)}
,
\label{Sl2}\end{aligned}$$ where ${S_1 (\bm \psi, \bm \tau)}$ is as defined, $$\begin{aligned}
\mathbf D^{(n)} & \triangleq
{\textup{diag}}\Bigg\{
\frac{ 1 } { \big| [\bm \beta^{(n)}]_1 \big| ^2 + \epsilon }
,\dots,
\frac{ 1 } { \big| [\bm \beta^{(n)}]_{L_k} \big| ^2 + \epsilon }
\Bigg\}
,
\label{Dn}\end{aligned}$$ and $C(\bm \beta^{(n)})$ is the constant independent of $\bm \psi$, $\bm \tau$, and $\bm \beta$. For given $\bm \psi $ and $\bm \tau$, the optimal value of $\bm \beta$ can be obtained as $$\begin{aligned}
\bm \beta^* (\bm \psi, \bm \tau) & =
bm \psi, \bm \tau, \bm \beta)$ is defined as the corresponding optimization objective. 

 Denote the estimates of the complex amplification, the AoA, and the way delay at the $ n$th iteration as $ \bm \beta^{(n) } $, $ \bm \psi^{(n) } $, and $ \bm \tau^{(n) } $, respectively. Utilizing the majorization - minorization (MM) iterative approach [ @log - sum-2; @log - sum-3 ] and exchangeable to [ @SFW - BS - GC ], the optimization in can be transform into minimizing the surrogate routine as $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 \min_{\bm \psi, \bm \tau } \ 
 \underbrace { 
 - \mathbf y_k^H \mathbf W^H \mathbf P_k (\bm \psi, \bm \tau) \Big (
 \mathbf P_k^H (\bm \psi, \bm \tau) \mathbf W \, \mathbf W^H\mathbf P_k (\bm \psi, \bm \tau) 
 + \lambda ^{-1 } \mathbf D^{(n) } 
 \Big)^{-1 } \mathbf P_k^H (\bm \psi, \bm \tau) \mathbf W\mathbf y_k 
 + 
 C(\bm \beta^{(n) }) 
 } _ { S_1 (\bm \psi, \bm \tau) } 
, 
 \label{Sl2}\end{aligned}$$ where $ { S_1 (\bm \psi, \bm \tau)}$ is as define, $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 \mathbf D^{(n) } & \triangleq 
 { \textup{diag}}\Bigg\ { 
 \frac { 1 } { \big| [ \bm \beta^{(n)}]_1 \big| ^2 + \epsilon } 
, \dots, 
 \frac { 1 } { \big| [ \bm \beta^{(n)}]_{L_k } \big| ^2 + \epsilon } 
 \Bigg\ } 
, 
 \label{Dn}\end{aligned}$$ and $ C(\bm \beta^{(n)})$ is the constant mugwump of $ \bm \psi$, $ \bm \tau$, and $ \bm \beta$. For given $ \bm \psi $ and $ \bm \tau$, the optimal value of $ \bm \beta$ can be prevail as $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 \bm \beta^ * (\bm \psi, \bm \tau) & =
bm \osi, \bm \tau, \bm \beta)$ is denined as the cortewpondiig optijization objective.

Denote the estimatxs od the complex gain, the AoA, xnd the pwth delat at rhe $n$th itxdation as $\bm \gcta^{(n)} $, $\um \psi^{(n)} $, and $\bm \tau^{(n)} $, res[ectively. Utilhzkny the majorization-minorization (MM) itqrative aoproach [@log-sum-2; @log-xtm-3] ahd similar to [@SFW-BS-GC], the optimizafion in can be transgormed into minimizing the surgogate function as $$\begin{aligngs}
\mig_{\vm \psi, \bm \taj } \
\underbrace{
- \mathbf y_i^H \mathbf W^H \mathbf P_k (\bm \psi, \bo \tau) \Big(
\mathbf P_j^H (\hk \psi, \bm \tan) \mathff W \, \mathbf W^H\mathbx P_k (\bm \psi, \bm \tau)
+ \lakbde ^{-1} \mqthbf D^{(n)}
\Big)^{-1} \mathbf P_k^I (\bm \psi, \bm \tau) \mathff W\mathbx v_k
+
C(\bm \beta^{(n)})
}_{S_1 (\bm \psi, \bn \rau)}
,
\latel{Sn2}\end{xoigved}$$ wiers ${S_1 (\bm \psm, \bm \tau)}$ is as defined, $$\begin{aligned}
\mathbf D^{(g)} & \triangleq
{\testup{diwg}}\Figg\{
\frac{ 1 } { \big| [\bm \beta^{(n)}]_1 \big| ^2 + \epsilon }
,\gota,
\frac{ 1 } { \big| [\bm \beta^{(n)}]_{L_k} \big| ^2 + \epsilon }
\Bigg\}
,
\lahel{Dn}\end{ajigned}$$ and $C(\bm \beta^{(n)})$ is the constant independent mf $\bm \osi$, $\bi \rak$, and $\bm \beta$. For given $\bm \psi $ and $\bm \tau$, thq oktikal value of $\bi \beta$ can ne onjained as $$\begiv{alignzs}
\bj \beta^* (\bm \psi, \bm \twu) & =
bm \psi, \bm \tau, \bm \beta)$ is the optimization objective. the estimates of and path delay at $n$th iteration as \beta^{(n)} $, $\bm \psi^{(n)} $, and \tau^{(n)} $, respectively. Utilizing the majorization-minorization (MM) iterative approach [@log-sum-2; @log-sum-3] and similar [@SFW-BS-GC], the optimization in can be transformed into minimizing the surrogate function as \min_{\bm \bm } \underbrace{ - \mathbf y_k^H \mathbf W^H \mathbf P_k (\bm \psi, \bm \tau) \Big( \mathbf P_k^H (\bm \bm \tau) \mathbf W \, \mathbf W^H\mathbf P_k \psi, \bm \tau) + ^{-1} \mathbf D^{(n)} \Big)^{-1} \mathbf (\bm \bm \tau) W\mathbf + \beta^{(n)}) }_{S_1 (\bm \bm \tau)} , \label{Sl2}\end{aligned}$$ where ${S_1 (\bm \psi, \bm \tau)}$ is as defined, $$\begin{aligned} \mathbf D^{(n)} & {\textup{diag}}\Bigg\{ \frac{ { \big| \beta^{(n)}]_1 ^2 \epsilon } ,\dots, } { \big| [\bm \beta^{(n)}]_{L_k} \big| } \Bigg\} , \label{Dn}\end{aligned}$$ and $C(\bm \beta^{(n)})$ is constant independent $\bm \psi$, $\bm \tau$, and $\bm For given $\bm \psi $ and $\bm \tau$, optimal value of $\bm \beta$ can be obtained as $$\begin{aligned} \bm \beta^* (\bm \psi, \bm =
bm \psi, \bm \tau, \bm \beta)$ is defined As the correSpondIng OptImIzatIon oBjective.

Denote THe esTimates of the complex gaiN, the AOA, ANd thE PaTh delAy at the $N$Th ITEraTiOn As $\bM \bETa^{(N)} $, $\bm \psI^{(n)} $, aNd $\bm \tau^{(N)} $, respectivEly. utIlizing the maJOrIzation-minOriZation (MM) iterAtiVe apprOaCh [@lOG-sum-2; @lOg-sUm-3] and SimilaR To [@SFW-Bs-GC], the optImIZation IN can be tRANsFormEd into minimizing tHE sURrogate functioN as $$\begIn{ALiGNEd}
\mIn_{\bM \psi, \bm \tau } \
\uNdErbraCE{
- \mathbf Y_K^H \MATHbf w^h \mathbf P_k (\bm \psI, \bm \tau) \Big(
\maTHbf p_k^H (\bm \pSi, \Bm \tAU) \mathbF W \, \matHbF w^H\mAthbf P_k (\bm \psI, \bm \tAu)
+ \lambda ^{-1} \mAthbf D^{(N)}
\big)^{-1} \mathBF P_k^H (\bm \pSi, \bm \taU) \maThbF W\maTHbF y_K
+
C(\bM \bETa^{(n)})
}_{s_1 (\Bm \Psi, \BM \taU)}
,
\label{Sl2}\EnD{aLigneD}$$ wheRE ${s_1 (\BM \psi, \Bm \tAu)}$ is As defIned, $$\begin{aligNed}
\MathBF D^{(n)} & \TrianGleq
{\tExtuP{dIag}}\BiGg\{
\frac{ 1 } { \Big| [\bm \BeTa^{(n)}]_1 \big| ^2 + \epsilon }
,\doTs,
\frAc{ 1 } { \big| [\bm \beTa^{(n)}]_{l_k} \Big| ^2 + \EpSilon }
\bIgg\}
,
\labEl{DN}\enD{aligneD}$$ and $C(\bm \BEta^{(N)})$ iS THE cOnstant independent Of $\BM \PsI$, $\bm \tau$, anD $\bm \betA$. foR gIVen $\bm \psi $ AnD $\bm \Tau$, tHE OptimAl vaLUe Of $\bm \beta$ Can be oBTaInEd as $$\begIn{AligneD}
\bM \beTa^* (\bM \psi, \bM \Tau) & =
bm \psi, \bm \tau, \bm \be ta)$ is de fined  as  th ecorr espo nding optimiza t ionobjective.

Denote the  esti ma t es o f  t he co mplex g a in , the  A oA , a nd th e pat h d elay at  the $n$th  it er ation as $\b m  \ beta^{(n)}  $,  $\bm \psi^{ (n) } $, a nd  $\ b m \ta u^{ (n)}$, res p ective ly. Utili zi n g them ajoriza t i on -min orization (MM) it e ra t ive approach [ @log-s um - 2; @ log -su m-3] and s im ilart o [@SFW - BS - G C ],t he optimizati on in can b e  tr ansfor me d i n to min imizi ng the  surrogatefunc tion as $ $\begi n {aligne d }
\min_ {\bm \ psi , \ bm \ t au  }  \\u n der b ra ce{ - \ mathbf y _k ^H  \mat hbfW ^ H \mat hbf  P_k  (\bm  \psi, \bm \t au)  \Bi g (
\ mathb f P_k ^H ( \b m \ps i, \bm  \tau )\mathbf W \, \m athb f W^H\mat hbf  P _k(\ bm \p s i, \bm  \t au) 
+ \lam bda ^{- 1 } \ ma t h b fD^{(n)}
\Big)^{-1}  \ m a th bf P_k^H  (\bm\ ps i, \bm \tau )\ma thbf W \math bf y _ k+
C(\bm\beta^ { (n )} )
}_{S_ 1(\bm \ ps i,\bm  \tau ) }
,\label {Sl2}\en d{ali g ned}$$ where $ { S_1 (\bm \psi ,  \ b m  \ t au)} $ i s as define d, $ $ \beg in{a l ig ned } 
\mat hbf D ^{ ( n) }  & \triangleq
{\tex tu p{diag }}\Bi gg\{
\frac{ 1  } { \big| [ \ bm \beta ^{(n ) }] _ 1 \big| ^2 + \ epsil on }
,\dot s ,
\frac{  1 }{ \big|[\bm \bet a ^ {(n)}]_{ L_k } \ big | ^ 2 +\epsilon }
\B i g g\},\label{ Dn} \end{al ign ed} $$and  $ C(\bm \be ta^{(n)} )$  i sth e c onsta n t indepe nd ent  o f $ \bm \ p si$, $ \bm \ tau$ ,an d  $\ bm \bet a $. F or g iv en  $\b m \ ps i $ a nd $ \ bm\tau$,the optim alv alue  o f$\bm \b eta$ can be o bt ained as $ $\ beg in{ali g n ed}
\bm\beta^* (\bm \psi, \bm\ tau) &=
bm \psi,_\bm \tau,_\bm \beta)$ is defined_as the_corresponding_optimization objective.

Denote_the_estimates of the_complex gain, the_AoA, and the path_delay at the_$n$th_iteration as $\bm \beta^{(n)} $, $\bm \psi^{(n)} $, and $\bm \tau^{(n)} $, respectively. Utilizing_the_majorization-minorization (MM)_iterative_approach_[@log-sum-2; @log-sum-3] and similar to_[@SFW-BS-GC], the optimization in can_be transformed_into minimizing the surrogate function as $$\begin{aligned}
\min_{\bm \psi,_\bm_\tau } \
\underbrace{
-_\mathbf y_k^H \mathbf W^H \mathbf P_k (\bm \psi, \bm_\tau) \Big(
\mathbf P_k^H (\bm \psi, \bm_\tau) \mathbf W_\,_\mathbf_W^H\mathbf P_k (\bm \psi,_\bm \tau)
+ \lambda ^{-1} \mathbf D^{(n)}
\Big)^{-1}_\mathbf P_k^H (\bm \psi, \bm \tau)_\mathbf W\mathbf y_k
+
C(\bm \beta^{(n)})
}_{S_1 (\bm \psi, \bm_\tau)}
,
\label{Sl2}\end{aligned}$$ where ${S_1 (\bm \psi, \bm_\tau)}$ is as defined, $$\begin{aligned}
\mathbf_D^{(n)} &_\triangleq
{\textup{diag}}\Bigg\{
\frac{ 1 } { \big|_[\bm \beta^{(n)}]_1 \big|_^2 +_\epsilon }
,\dots,
\frac{ 1_} { \big| [\bm \beta^{(n)}]_{L_k} \big|_^2 + \epsilon_}
\Bigg\}
,
\label{Dn}\end{aligned}$$ and $C(\bm \beta^{(n)})$ is the_constant_independent of $\bm_\psi$,_$\bm_\tau$, and_$\bm \beta$. For_given_$\bm \psi_$_and $\bm \tau$, the optimal value_of_$\bm \beta$ can be obtained as $$\begin{aligned}
\bm_\beta^* (\bm \psi, \bm_\tau)_& =