 the data where different data sets from the literature have different calibration errors. Also, these discrepancies could be in part attributed to the internal dynamics of the observed galaxies because of the different fiber and/or slit placements. We can improve the fit even further by restricting ourselves to the largest homogeneous dataset from the literature [*i.e.*]{}, the 63 new redshifts measurements of CD96. We then find excellent agreement between our measurements (the dotted histogram and Gaussian fit) with a mean offset of 3 ${\rm km\,s^{-1}}$ and an RMS scatter of 24 ${\rm km\,s^{-1}}$. Overall, the agreement of our redshift determinations with the literature is remarkably good. The RMS scatter between datasets indicates that our estimate of the errors in the wavelength calibration is accurate.

Spectral Classifications {#classifications}
========================

In this section, we consider the spectral classification of our Coma galaxies. We have investigated four different algorithms, all of which could be implemented for the main SDSS galaxy survey. The first algorithm is based on visual inspections of the spectra but quantified using measurements of the equivalent widths[^2] of the lines seen in the spectrum. The next two algorithms, Wavelets and Principal Component Analysis (PCA), were used to objectively classify the spectra using the visual inspections to define relevant thresholds in wavelet and eigenspace. The final classification scheme attempts to define a physical classification scheme based on synthetic models of galaxies.

Line Strength Classifications {#lines}
-----------------------------

We started by visually classifying the spectra into five classes which could then be compared to the other algorithms. We first divide the spectra into two broad classes: emission and absorption line galaxies. Absorption line spectra were then sub–divided into normal absorption line systems and objects with strong Balmer lines or post–starburst galaxies. The spectra showing emission lines were sub–divided into three categories depending on the strength of the emission lines.

For our visual and line–strength classification scheme, we were able to use both the blue side of the spectrum and the presence of H$\alpha$ in the red end of the spectrum. Unfortunately the other classification algorithms could not use the red side of the spectrum due to the condensation problems discussed above. Since H$\alpha$ is a powerful indicator of star–formation, we believe that one of the classification schemes should utilize these data even if the others could not. Moreover, the other algorithms used our line strength classifications to quantify star–formation in Coma and therefore, it was justified to make the line
the data where different data sets from the literature get unlike calibration errors. Also, these discrepancy could be in function attributed to the internal moral force of the observed galaxies because of the different roughage and/or slit placements. We can improve the burst even further by restricting ourselves to the large homogeneous dataset from the literature [ * i.e. * ] { }, the 63 newfangled redshifts measurements of CD96. We then find excellent agreement between our measurements (the dotted histogram and Gaussian paroxysm) with a mean offset of 3 $ { \rm km\,s^{-1}}$ and an RMS scatter of 24 $ { \rm km\,s^{-1}}$. Overall, the agreement of our redshift determination with the literature is remarkably good. The RMS scatter between datasets indicates that our estimate of the mistake in the wavelength calibration is accurate. 

 Spectral Classifications { # classifications } 
 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 

 In this section, we consider the spectral classification of our Coma galaxy. We have investigated four different algorithms, all of which could be implemented for the main SDSS galaxy survey. The first algorithm is based on visual inspections of the spectra but quantified using measurements of the equivalent widths[^2 ] of the lines seen in the spectrum. The following two algorithms, Wavelets and Principal Component Analysis (PCA), were used to objectively relegate the spectrum use the visual inspections to define relevant thresholds in wavelet and eigenspace. The final classification schema attempts to define a physical classification scheme based on celluloid models of galaxies. 

 Line Strength Classifications { # lines } 
 ----------------------------- 

 We start by visually classify the spectra into five classes which could then be compared to the other algorithms. We foremost divide the spectra into two broad classes: emission and absorption line galaxies. Absorption tune spectra were then sub – separate into normal absorption line organization and objects with potent Balmer lines or post – starburst galaxy. The spectra show emission lines were sub – divided into three categories depending on the military capability of the emission tune. 

 For our visual and line – strength classification scheme, we were able to practice both the blue side of the spectrum and the bearing of H$\alpha$ in the red end of the spectrum. Unfortunately the other categorization algorithms could not use the red side of the spectrum due to the condensation problems discussed above. Since H$\alpha$ is a powerful indicator of star – formation, we think that one of the classification schemes should use these datum even if the others could not. Moreover, the other algorithm used our line strength categorization to quantify star – formation in Coma and therefore, it was justified to make the line
 thf data where different dxta sets from tkw litecature gave difwerent calibration errors. Aldo, thest discrepancies couud be in iart attrubuttd to the internal dynamigf of bhe oysxrved galaxies necause of dhe different xicex and/or slit placements. We can improde the gih even further by geftridnikg ourselves to the largest homofeneous dataset from the literature [*i.e.*]{}, the 63 nea refshifts measuremenhs of CD96. We theg find excelldnt agreemtnc between oor measurements (the dotted histoeram cnd Gaussiab dit) fith a mean offsvt of 3 ${\rm km\,s^{-1}}$ and an SMS scayter of 24 ${\rm km\,x^{-1}}$. Oteraol, the agreement of onr redshift determinwtions widh the literature iw eemarnablf goue. Tfe DMX acatteg bxtween dataaets indicares that our estimaue jd the errors jn the wwvelength calibration is accurate.

Spectrdl Dlassifications {#classifucations}
========================

In this sectiln, we confider the spectral classification of our Coma galdxies. De kqve ivcedtigated four different algorithms, all of whisg volld be implementeb for the main SCSD bwlaxy survey. Jhe first zlgorithm is based on visoal inwpections of yhe spectra but quantified ysing measurvmenrs of the equivaleut widths[^2] of the linex seen in the spectrum. Che nest two algogithms, Wabdlets and Princioal Cmmponent Analysis (PCA), were used to ibjeetively zlasxify tre spectra usinn the visual inspechions tm define rflevant thresholds in wavelet aiv eigenspace. Jhe fital clasfificstion scheme wttempts to deyine a pkysicau classifibation scieme based og synthetic mmfels of galaeies.

Line Ftrebgth Classiwkcations {#lines}
-----------------------------

Ee starteb by cisually classifyikg thg apectra into firt coasses which coild thqn bx com[dred to the mthef auboritfms. We firsb dkvidr the spectra into tfo bdoad classes: emissook and absirption jine galaxies. Absorption line skectra wece them sob–divided into normal absorptioh line sydteis and objeces wlth ftrong Balker lines or post–starburst galaxies. The spectra showing gmission lines were sob–dlvided into vhree sategoriev depending on the srrength of the emlssion lines.

For our viaual atd lije–strength classification scheme, we were able to use both the blue side od the spectrum and the presvncz oy H$\alphw$ in vhe red end of thv spectrum. Unfortunately the othxr classifhcction algorithms could not usr ghe red side uf the spectrum due to tge condemsation problems discussed abovr. Since H$\alpha$ is a powevful indixator of star–focmation, we believe tnat onz of tye claswifigation schemes shpupd utilizf thtse bata even if the others could not. Moreoceg, the other algocithms used lmr ling strengjh classificationa to euantkfy star–formayion in Coma amd therefore, it was buftified to makt the line
the data where different data sets from have calibration errors. these discrepancies could the dynamics of the galaxies because of different fiber and/or slit placements. We improve the fit even further by restricting ourselves to the largest homogeneous dataset the literature [*i.e.*]{}, the 63 new redshifts measurements of CD96. We then find agreement our (the histogram and Gaussian fit) with a mean offset of 3 ${\rm km\,s^{-1}}$ and an RMS scatter 24 ${\rm km\,s^{-1}}$. Overall, the agreement of our determinations with the literature remarkably good. The RMS scatter datasets that our of errors the wavelength calibration accurate. Spectral Classifications {#classifications} ======================== In this section, we consider the spectral classification of our Coma galaxies. have investigated algorithms, all which be for the main survey. The first algorithm is based of the spectra but quantified using measurements of equivalent widths[^2] the lines seen in the spectrum. next two algorithms, Wavelets and Principal Component Analysis were used to objectively classify the spectra using the visual inspections to define relevant thresholds and eigenspace. The final scheme attempts to a classification based synthetic models galaxies. Line Strength Classifications {#lines} ----------------------------- We started by visually classifying spectra into five classes which could then be compared to algorithms. first divide the into two broad classes: and line galaxies. Absorption line then into systems objects strong Balmer lines or galaxies. The spectra showing emission were sub–divided into three of the emission lines. For our visual and classification scheme, we were able to use the blue side of the spectrum and the presence of H$\alpha$ in red end spectrum. Unfortunately the other classification algorithms could not the red side of spectrum due to the condensation problems discussed above. Since is powerful indicator star–formation, we believe one of the schemes should utilize even if others not. algorithms used our line strength classifications quantify in Coma and therefore, it justified the line
 the data where different data Sets from thE liteRatUre HaVe diFferEnt calibration ERrorS. Also, these discrepancieS coulD bE In paRT aTtribUted to tHE iNTErnAl DyNamIcS Of The obSerVed galaXies becausE of ThE different fiBEr And/or slit pLacEments. We can iMprOve the FiT evEN furtHer By resTrictiNG ourseLves to the LaRGest hoMOgeneouS DAtAset From the literature [*I.E.*]{}, tHE 63 new redshifts mEasureMeNTs OF cD96. WE thEn find exceLlEnt agREement bETwEEN Our MEasurements (thE dotted histOGraM and GaUsSiaN Fit) witH a meaN oFFseT of 3 ${\rm km\,s^{-1}}$ and An RMs scatter oF 24 ${\rm km\,s^{-1}}$. oVerall, tHE agreemEnt of oUr rEdsHift DEtErMinAtIOns WItH thE LitErature iS rEmArkabLy goOD. tHE RMS ScaTter BetweEn datasets indIcaTes tHAt oUr estImate Of thE eRrors In the wAveleNgTh calibration is AccuRate.

SpectRal clAssIfIcatiONs {#clasSifIcaTions}
========================

In This secTIon, We CONSiDer the spectral clasSiFICaTion of ouR Coma gALaXiES. We have iNvEstIgatED Four dIffeREnT algoritHms, all OF wHiCh could Be ImplemEnTed For The maIN SDSs galaxY survey. THe firST algorithm is baSEd on visual insPEcTIOnS Of thE spEctra but quaNtifIEd usIng mEAsUreMEnts oF the eQuIVaLEnt widths[^2] of the lines SeEn in thE specTrum. The next twO algorithmS, wAVelets anD PriNCiPAl Component AnaLysis (pCA), were useD To objectIvely Classify The spectrA USing the vIsuAl iNspEctIONs To define relevANT thrEsHolds in WavElet and EigEnsPacE. ThE fInal classIficatioN sChEmE aTteMpts tO Define a pHySicAl ClaSsifiCAtion sCheme BaseD oN sYNthEtic modELs OF GalaXiEs.

line strEnGth ClAssiFIcaTions {#liNes}
-----------------------------

We starTed BY visUaLlY classiFying the spectRa Into five clAsSes Which cOULd then be Compared to the other algorIThms. We fIrsT diviDe thE spectra iNto Two broAd cLAsses: eMissioN and aBsOrpTIOn linE GAlAxiEs. absorption LINe sPectrA wEre tHen sub–dIvided into normal abSOrpTion line systeMs aNd obJECtS wiTH sTRonG BALmeR LInes or post–starbUrst galaxiEs. tHe Spectra shoWIng EmIssion lInes werE sub–dIVided inTo three caTegories dEpEndiNG On tHe strength Of the emiSsion lineS.

for ouR ViSual aNd lIne–strEnGth ClassIficatIOn sCheme, We were AbLe to usE both ThE blue sidE of the spectrum and the preSence oF H$\alpHa$ iN the red enD of THe sPectrum. UnFortUnately the OthEr cLassiFicATion aLgorIThMs cOUld noT use THe red side OF tHe sPECtRum due to the CONDenSatioN prOBlems dIscuSsed above. Since H$\alPHa$ is a powerful iNdicATOr oF stAR–forMaTion, we believe tHat OnE OF the clasSiFication schEmes shouLd UTilizE these Data evEn if the OTHeRS could Not. MOreOver, the otHer AlGOrithms UsEd OUr line StreNgTh clasSificaTIons TO Quantify star–formAtion IN coma aND thErefoRe, It was juSTifiEd to make thE line
 the data where differentdata setsfromthe  li te ratu re h ave differentc alib ration errors. Also, t hesedi s crep a nc ies c ould be in p art  a tt rib ut e dto th e i nternal  dynamicsofth e observed g a la xies becau seof the diffe ren t fibe rand / or sl itplace ments. We can  improveth e  fit e v en furt h e rby r estricting oursel v es to the largest  homog en e ou s dat ase t from the  l itera t ure [*i . e. * ] { },t he 63 new red shifts meas u rem ents o fCD9 6 . We t hen f in d  ex cellent agr eeme nt betwee n ourm easurem e nts (th e dott edhis togr a man d G au s sia n  f it) wit h a mean  o ff set o f 3$ { \ r m km \,s ^{-1 }}$ a nd an RMS sca tte r of 24${\rm  km\, s^{- 1} }$. O verall , the  a greement of our  red shift det erm in ati on s wit h  the l ite rat ure isremarka b lygo o d .  T he RMS scatter bet we e n  d atasetsindica t es  t h at our e st ima te o f the e rror s  i n the wa veleng t hca librati on  is ac cu rat e.
Spec t ralClassi fication s {#c l assifications} ============= = == = = == = ===
In  this secti on,w e co nsid e rthe spect ral c la s si f ication of our Coma  g alaxie s. We  have investi gated four d i fferentalgo r it h ms, all of whi ch co uld be imp l ementedfor t he mainSDSS gala x y  survey.  Th e f irs t a l g or ithm is based o n vi su al insp ect ions of  th e s pec tra  b ut quanti fied usi ng  m ea su rem entso f the eq ui val en t w idths [ ^2] of  theline sse e n i n the s p ec t r um.Th enext  tw oalgor ithm s , W avelets  and Prin cip a l Co mp on ent Ana lysis (PCA),we re used to  o bje ctivel y classify  the spectra using thev isual i nsp ectio ns t o definerel evantthr e sholds  in wa velet  a nde i gensp a c e.  Th efinal clas s i fic ation  s chem e attem pts to define a ph y sic al classifica tio n sc h e me  ba s ed onsy n the t i c models of gal axies.

Li ne St rength Cla s sif ic ations{#lines }
--- - ------- --------- --------- 
We s t a rte d by visua lly clas sifying t h e spe c tr a int o f ive cl as ses  whic h coul d  th en be  compa re d to t he ot he r algori thms. We first divide t he spe ctraint o two bro adc las ses: emis sion  and absor pti onlinegal a xies.  Abs o rp tio n  line  spe c tra weret he n s u b –d ivided into n o rma l abs orp t ion li ne s ystems and object s  with strong B alme r lin eso r po st –starburst gal axi es . The spec tr a showing e missionli n es we re sub –divid ed into t hr e e cate gori esdepending  on  t h e stren gt ho f theemis si on lin es.

F o r ou r visual and line– stren g t h cla s sif icati on  scheme ,  wewere ableto use both  the b luesideof thesp ectrum  an dthe presen c e of H$\a lpha$  in the  r ed e ndof the  spe c t rum.Unfo rt una tely theo t he r  c la s sif icat ion a lg orit hms could not usethe red sid eoft h e spec t ru m due to the  co ndens a t ion proble m s di s cu s sed a bove.SinceH$\alph a $ i sa power ful i ndicatorof star–f o rma ti on,we belie ve  tha tone  o f the classific ation sc hemes sh o u ld uti liz e  the s e data  e ven if the o thers  c o uld not . Mor eover,t heoth eralgo rit hmsu sed our line strength cl assi ficat i ons  to q uanti fy  star–fo r mati on in Co m a and therefo re, it was just i fie d  tomak e  t he  line
 the_data where_different data sets from_the literature_have_different calibration_errors._Also, these discrepancies_could be in_part attributed to the_internal dynamics of_the_observed galaxies because of the different fiber and/or slit placements. We can improve the_fit_even further_by_restricting_ourselves to the largest homogeneous_dataset from the literature [*i.e.*]{},_the 63_new redshifts measurements of CD96. We then find_excellent_agreement between our_measurements (the dotted histogram and Gaussian fit) with a_mean offset of 3 ${\rm km\,s^{-1}}$_and an RMS_scatter_of_24 ${\rm km\,s^{-1}}$. Overall,_the agreement of our redshift determinations_with the literature is remarkably good._The RMS scatter between datasets indicates that_our estimate of the errors in_the wavelength calibration is accurate.

Spectral_Classifications {#classifications}
========================

In_this section, we consider the_spectral classification of_our Coma_galaxies. We have_investigated four different algorithms, all of_which could be_implemented for the main SDSS galaxy_survey._The first algorithm_is_based_on visual_inspections of the_spectra_but quantified_using_measurements of the equivalent widths[^2] of_the_lines seen in the spectrum. The next_two algorithms, Wavelets and_Principal_Component Analysis (PCA), were_used to objectively classify the_spectra using the visual inspections to_define relevant_thresholds in_wavelet and eigenspace. The final classification scheme attempts to define a_physical classification scheme based on synthetic_models of galaxies.

Line Strength_Classifications {#lines}
-----------------------------

We_started_by visually classifying_the_spectra into_five classes which could then be compared_to the_other algorithms. We first divide the_spectra into two broad_classes:_emission and absorption line galaxies. Absorption_line spectra were then sub–divided into_normal absorption line systems and_objects_with_strong Balmer lines or post–starburst_galaxies. The spectra showing emission lines_were sub–divided into_three categories depending on the strength of_the_emission lines.

For our visual and line–strength_classification_scheme, we were able to use_both_the_blue side of the spectrum_and the presence of H$\alpha$ in_the red end of the spectrum. Unfortunately the other_classification algorithms could_not use the red side_of_the_spectrum due to the condensation problems discussed above. Since H$\alpha$_is a_powerful indicator of_star–formation, we believe that one of the classification schemes should_utilize these data even if the others_could not. Moreover, the other algorithms used our line strength classifications_to quantify star–formation in Coma and therefore, it_was justified to make the line