) leads to a simple mathematical representation of the final basic equation (if a complex-valued state function is introduced). One may also say that the linearity of the equations is a consequence of this principle of maximal disorder. This is the deeper reason why it has been possible, see [@klein:schroedingers], to derive Schrödinger’s equation from a set of assumptions including linearity.

Besides the Pauli equation we found, as a second important result of our spin calculation, that the following local force is compatible with the statistical constraint: $$\label{eq:LO3DAZI8FF}
\vec{F}^{L}+\vec{F}^{I}=
e \left( \vec{E} + \frac{1}{c} \vec{v} \times \vec{B} \right)
-\vec{\mu} \cdot \frac{\partial}{\partial\vec{x} } \vec{B}
\mbox{.}$$ Here, the velocity field $\tilde{\vec{v}}(x,t)$ and the magnetic moment field $\vec{\mu}(x,t)=-(e/mc)\vec{s}(x,t)$ have been replaced by corresponding particle quantities $\vec{v}(t)$ and $\vec{\mu}(t)$; the dot denotes the inner product between $\vec{\mu}$ and $\vec{B}$. The first force in (\[eq:LO3DAZI8FF\]), the Lorentz force, has been derived here from first principles without any additional assumptions. The same cannot be said about the second force which takes this particular form as a consequence of some additional assumptions concerning the form of the ’internal force’ $\vec{F}^{R}$ \[see (\[eq:NG89NWG2EN\])\]. In particular, the field appearing in $\vec{F}^{R}$ was arbitrary as well as the proportionality constant (g-factor of the electron) and had to be adjusted by hand. It is well-known that in a relativistic treatment the spin term appears automatically if the potentials are introduced. Interestingly, this unity is not restricted to the relativistic regime. Following [@arunsalam:hamiltonians] and [@gould:intrinsic] we report in the next section an alternative (non-relativistic) derivation of spin, which does not contain any arbitrary fields or constants - but is unable to yield the expression  for the macroscopic electromagnetic forces.

In the present treatment spin has been introduced as a
) leads to a simple mathematical representation of the concluding basic equality (if a building complex - valued state function is introduce). One may also say that the one-dimensionality of the equations is a consequence of this principle of maximal disorder. This is the deep reason why it has been possible, experience   [ @klein: schroedingers ], to derive Schrödinger ’s equation from a bent of assumption including linearity. 

 Besides the Pauli equation we found, as a second important consequence of our spin calculation, that the following local force is compatible with the statistical restraint: $ $ \label{eq: LO3DAZI8FF } 
 \vec{F}^{L}+\vec{F}^{I}= 
 e \left (\vec{E } + \frac{1}{c } \vec{v } \times \vec{B } \right) 
 -\vec{\mu } \cdot \frac{\partial}{\partial\vec{x } } \vec{B } 
 \mbox{.}$$ Here, the velocity plain $ \tilde{\vec{v}}(x, t)$ and the magnetic here and now field $ \vec{\mu}(x, t)=-(e / mc)\vec{s}(x, t)$ have been replaced by corresponding particle quantities $ \vec{v}(t)$ and $ \vec{\mu}(t)$; the acid denotes the inner product between $ \vec{\mu}$ and $ \vec{B}$. The first force in   (\[eq: LO3DAZI8FF\ ]), the Lorentz force, has been derived here from first principles without any additional assumptions. The same cannot be said about the second force which takes this particular form as a consequence of some extra premise concerning the mannequin of the ’ internal force ’ $ \vec{F}^{R}$ \[see   (\[eq: NG89NWG2EN\])\ ]. In particular, the field appear in $ \vec{F}^{R}$ was arbitrary as well as the proportionality constant (g - agent of the electron) and had to be adjusted by hand. It is well - known that in a relativistic treatment the spin terminus appears automatically if the potentials are introduced. Interestingly, this oneness is not restricted to the relativistic government. Following   [ @arunsalam: hamiltonians ] and   [ @gould: intrinsic ] we report in the next section an alternative (non - relativistic) derivation of tailspin, which does not contain any arbitrary fields or constants - but is unable to yield the expression    for the macroscopic electromagnetic forces. 

 In the present treatment spin has been bring in as a
) lewds to a simple mathematlcal representatnin of vhe finzl basic equation (if a complex-valued srate dunction is introduced). One may wlso say thau the linearity oh the eqmctiona is c ronsequence of jhis principne of maximal giroxder. This is the deeper reason why ie has brej possible, see [@hleim:fchrkvdlngers], to derive Schrödinger’s equztion fgom a set of assukptions including linearitj.

Besldes the Pauli equwtion we foohd, ww a second ioportant rtsblt of our apin calculation, that the folloding kocal forcg js wompatible xith tre statistical constsaint: $$\lsbel{eq:LO3DAZI8FF}
\yec{F}^{L}+\tec{F}^{U}=
e \left( \vec{E} + \frac{1}{c} \vxc{v} \times \vec{B} \right)
-\dec{\mu} \cdod \yrac{\partial}{\partial\vec{z} } \vec{B}
\kbox{.}$$ Herd, thd vtloritg fielf $\tmlde{\vec{v}}(x,t)$ znd the magbetic moment field $\fes{\nu}(x,t)=-(e/mc)\vec{s}(x,t)$ have feqn replaced by corresponding particle qlantjties $\vec{v}(t)$ and $\vec{\mu}(t)$; rhe dot denotes the ijner prodtct between $\vec{\mu}$ and $\vec{B}$. The first force in (\[eq:LO3GAZI8FH\]), ghe Ljfwnhz force, has been derived here from first prigdiklex without any cdditional assumltlomf. The same cavnot bz szid about the secojd forcg whicy takes tris larticular form as a conseqyence of somv adeitional assumptious concerniny the gorm pf the ’internal force’ $\vzc{F}^{R}$ \[sse (\[eq:NG89NWG2EN\])\]. In partidjlar, the field aopesrhng in $\vtz{F}^{R}$ was arbitrary as well es thz proporgionslity sonstant (g-vactov of the electron) ajd hab to te adjustef by hand. It is well-known that mi a relativisjic trvatment tke spik term appears wutomatically nf the pjtentkals are ihtroducxd. Interestiggly, this unidi is not restcicted to the relqtivistkz regime. Folloeing [@arunscjam:hqmiltonians] and [@goukd:ivfrinsic] we repoxu ib the next sectoon an aptxrnatyee (non-relatieistkc) arrivagion of spik, wfich does not contain anf argitrary fields or vokstants - vut is ugable to yielc the expression  flr thx macruscopoc glectromagnetic forces.

In the prssent trewtmcnt spin has feen introduced cs a
) leads to a simple mathematical representation final equation (if complex-valued state function say the linearity of equations is a of this principle of maximal disorder. is the deeper reason why it has been possible, see [@klein:schroedingers], to derive equation from a set of assumptions including linearity. Besides the Pauli equation we as second result our spin calculation, that the following local force is compatible with the statistical constraint: $$\label{eq:LO3DAZI8FF} \vec{F}^{L}+\vec{F}^{I}= \left( \vec{E} + \frac{1}{c} \vec{v} \times \vec{B} \right) \cdot \frac{\partial}{\partial\vec{x} } \vec{B} Here, the velocity field $\tilde{\vec{v}}(x,t)$ the moment field have replaced corresponding particle quantities and $\vec{\mu}(t)$; the dot denotes the inner product between $\vec{\mu}$ and $\vec{B}$. The first force in (\[eq:LO3DAZI8FF\]), Lorentz force, derived here first without additional assumptions. The be said about the second force particular form as a consequence of some additional concerning the of the ’internal force’ $\vec{F}^{R}$ \[see In particular, the field appearing in $\vec{F}^{R}$ was as well as the proportionality constant (g-factor of the electron) and had to be adjusted It is well-known that a relativistic treatment spin appears if potentials are Interestingly, this unity is not restricted to the relativistic regime. Following and [@gould:intrinsic] we report in the next section an alternative of which does not any arbitrary fields or - is unable to yield for macroscopic the treatment has been introduced as
) leads to a simple mathematicaL representAtion Of tHe fInAl baSic eQuation (if a compLEx-vaLued state function is intRoducEd). oNe maY AlSo say That the LInEARitY oF tHe eQuATiOns is A coNsequenCe of this prIncIpLe of maximal dISoRder. This is The Deeper reason Why It has bEeN poSSible, See [@Klein:SchroeDIngers], To derive SChRÖdingeR’S equatiON FrOm a sEt of assumptions inCLuDIng linearity.

BeSides tHe pAuLI EquAtiOn we found, aS a SeconD ImportaNT rESULt oF Our spin calculAtion, that thE FolLowing LoCal FOrce is CompaTiBLe wIth the statiSticAl constraInt: $$\labEL{eq:LO3DAzi8FF}
\vec{F}^{l}+\vec{F}^{I}=
E \leFt( \vEc{E} + \fRAc{1}{C} \vEc{v} \TiMEs \vEC{B} \RigHT)
-\veC{\mu} \cdot \fRaC{\pArtiaL}{\parTIAL\Vec{x} } \Vec{b}
\mboX{.}$$ Here, The velocity fiEld $\TildE{\Vec{V}}(x,t)$ anD the mAgneTiC momeNt fielD $\vec{\mU}(x,T)=-(e/mc)\vec{s}(x,t)$ have bEen rEplaced by CorReSpoNdIng paRTicle qUanTitIes $\vec{v}(T)$ and $\vec{\MU}(t)$; tHe DOT DeNotes the inner produCt BETwEen $\vec{\mu}$ And $\vec{b}$. thE fIRst force In (\[Eq:Lo3DAZi8ff\]), the LOrenTZ fOrce, has bEen derIVeD hEre from FiRst priNcIplEs wIthouT Any aDditioNal assumPtionS. the same cannot bE Said about the sECoND FoRCe whIch Takes this paRticULar fOrm aS A cOnsEQuencE of soMe ADdITional assumptions coNcErning The foRm of the ’internAl force’ $\vec{f}^{r}$ \[SEe (\[eq:NG89NWg2EN\])\]. IN PaRTicular, the fielD appeAring in $\vec{f}^{r}$ was arbiTrary As well as The proporTIOnality cOnsTanT (g-fActOR Of The electron) anD HAd to Be AdjusteD by Hand. It iS weLl-kNowN thAt In a relatiVistic trEaTmEnT tHe sPin teRM appears AuTomAtIcaLly if THe poteNtialS are InTrODucEd. InterEStINGly, tHiS uNity Is nOt RestrIcteD To tHe relatIvistic reGimE. follOwInG [@arunsaLam:hamiltoniaNs] And [@gould:inTrInsIc] we rePORt in the nExt section an alternative (NOn-relatIviStic) dErivAtion of spIn, wHich doEs nOT contaIn any aRbitrArY fiELDs or cONStAntS - bUt is unable TO YieLd the ExPresSion  for The macroscopic elecTRomAgnetic forces.

in tHe prESEnT trEAtMEnt SpIN haS BEen introduced as A
) leads to a simple mathem atical rep resen tat ion  o f th e fi nal basic equa t ion(if a complex-valued s tatefu n ctio n  i s int roduced ) .O n e m ay  a lso  s a ythatthe  linear ity of the  eq ua tions is a c o ns equence of  th is principle  of  maxim al  di s order . T his i s thed eeperreason wh yi t hasb een pos s i bl e, s ee [@klein:schroe d in g ers], to deriv e Schr öd i ng e r ’sequ ation from  a  seto f assum p ti o n s  in c luding linear ity.

Besid e s t he Pau li  eq u ationwe fo un d , a s a secondimpo rtant res ult of our spi n  calcul ation,  th atthef ol lo win gl oca l  f orc e  is  compati bl ewiththes t a t isti cal  con strai nt: $$\label{ eq: LO3D A ZI8 FF}
\ vec{F }^{L }+ \vec{ F}^{I} =
e \ le ft( \vec{E} + \ frac {1}{c} \v ec{ v}  \t im es \v e c{B} \ rig ht) 
-\vec{ \mu} \c d ot\f r a c {\ partial}{\partial\ ve c { x}  } \vec{ B}
\mb o x{ .} $ $ Here,th e v eloc i t y fie ld $ \ ti lde{\vec {v}}(x , t) $and the  m agneti cmom ent  fiel d  $\v ec{\mu }(x,t)=- (e/mc ) \vec{s}(x,t)$h ave been repl a ce d by corr esp onding part icle quan titi e s$\v e c{v}( t)$ a nd $\ v ec{\mu}(t)$; the do tdenote s the  inner produc t between$ \ v ec{\mu}$  and $\ v ec{B}$. The fi rst f orce in (\ [ eq:LO3DA ZI8FF \]), the  Lorentzf o rce, has  be ender ive d he re from first p rinc ip les wit hou t any a ddi tio nal  as su mptions.The same  c an no tbesaida bout the  s eco nd  fo rce w h ich ta kes t hispa rt i cul ar form as a  con se qu ence  of  s ome a ddit i ona l assum ptions co nce r ning  t he  form o f the ’intern al  force’ $\ ve c{F }^{R}$ \ [see (\[ eq:NG89NWG2EN\])\]. Inp articul ar,  thefiel d appeari ngin $\v ec{ F }^{R}$  was a rbitr ar y a s wella s  t hepr oportional i t y c onsta nt  (g- factorof the electron) a n d h ad to be adju ste d by h an d.I ti s w el l -kn o w n that in a rel ativistictr e at ment the s p inte rm appe ars aut omati c ally if  the pote ntials ar eintr o d uce d. Interes tingly,this unit y  is n o trestr ict ed toth e r elati vistic reg ime.Follow in g [@ar unsal am :hamilto nians] and [@gould:intr insic]  we r epo rt in the  ne x t s ection an  alt ernative ( non -re lativ ist i c) de riva t io n o f  spin , wh i ch does n o tcon t a in  any arbitr a r y  fi eldsorc onstan ts -  but is unable to yield the expr essi o n   f ort he m ac roscopic elect rom ag n e tic forc es .

In the p resent t re a tment  spinhas be en intr o d uc e d as a 
) leads_to a_simple mathematical representation of_the final_basic_equation (if_a_complex-valued state function_is introduced). One_may also say that_the linearity of_the_equations is a consequence of this principle of maximal disorder. This is the deeper_reason_why it_has_been_possible, see [@klein:schroedingers], to derive Schrödinger’s_equation from a set of_assumptions including_linearity.

Besides the Pauli equation we found, as a_second_important result of_our spin calculation, that the following local force is_compatible with the statistical constraint: $$\label{eq:LO3DAZI8FF}
\vec{F}^{L}+\vec{F}^{I}=
e_\left( \vec{E} +_\frac{1}{c}_\vec{v}_\times \vec{B} \right)
-\vec{\mu} \cdot_\frac{\partial}{\partial\vec{x} } \vec{B}
\mbox{.}$$ Here, the velocity_field $\tilde{\vec{v}}(x,t)$ and the magnetic moment_field $\vec{\mu}(x,t)=-(e/mc)\vec{s}(x,t)$ have been replaced by corresponding_particle quantities $\vec{v}(t)$ and $\vec{\mu}(t)$; the_dot denotes the inner product_between $\vec{\mu}$_and $\vec{B}$. The first force_in (\[eq:LO3DAZI8FF\]), the Lorentz_force, has_been derived here_from first principles without any additional_assumptions. The same_cannot be said about the second_force_which takes this_particular_form_as a_consequence of some_additional_assumptions concerning_the_form of the ’internal force’ $\vec{F}^{R}$_\[see (\[eq:NG89NWG2EN\])\]._In particular, the field appearing in $\vec{F}^{R}$_was arbitrary as well_as_the proportionality constant (g-factor_of the electron) and had_to be adjusted by hand. It_is well-known_that in_a relativistic treatment the spin term appears automatically if the potentials_are introduced. Interestingly, this unity is_not restricted to the_relativistic regime._Following [@arunsalam:hamiltonians]_and [@gould:intrinsic] we report_in_the next_section an alternative (non-relativistic) derivation of spin,_which does_not contain any arbitrary fields or_constants - but is_unable_to yield the expression  for the_macroscopic electromagnetic forces.

In the present treatment_spin has been introduced as_a