(\pmb{h}(K_t)+\pmb{h}(K_u)\right)
        \over 
        \cosh\left(\pmb{h}(K_t)\right)\cdot\cosh
        \left(\pmb{h}(K_u)\right)
    }
    \Big)
    \nonumber
    \\[0,3cm]
    =
    {1\over 2}
    \phi_{\pmb{p},\pmb{h},G}
    \big(
    \mathds{1}_{\{x\not\leftrightarrow y\}}
    \cdot
    \big\{
    1
    +
    \tanh\left(\pmb{h}(K_t)\right)
    \cdot
    \tanh\left(\pmb{h}(K_u)\right)
    \big\}
    \big).
    \end{gathered}$$ Replacing the last expression in we get that $$\begin{aligned}
\label{I-2-1}
    I_2
    =
    {1\over 2}
    \phi_{\pmb{p},\pmb{h},G}
    \big(
    \mathds{1}_{\{x\not\leftrightarrow y\}}
    \cdot
    \tanh\left(\pmb{h}(K_t)\right)
    \cdot 
    \tanh\left(\pmb{h}(K_u)\right)
    \big).
    \end{aligned}$$ Since $\tau_{2\beta,\pmb{h},2,V}(x,y)=I_1+I_2$, the theorem follows.

Notice that in the absence of the magnetic field, i.e. $\pmb{h}\equiv 0$, the conclusion of the Theorem \[Correlação/quase-conectividade\] reduces to $$\tau_{2\beta,0,2,V}(x,y)=
    {1\over 2}\phi_{\pmb{p},0,G}(x\leftrightarrow y),
    \quad \forall x,y\in V$$ which is a well known identity for the Ising/Potts model with $q=2$, see [@Grimmett2] Theorem 1.16, p. 11.

\[col\] The spin-spin correlation of the Ising model on the finite
( \pmb{h}(K_t)+\pmb{h}(K_u)\right) 
         \over 
         \cosh\left(\pmb{h}(K_t)\right)\cdot\cosh 
         \left(\pmb{h}(K_u)\right) 
     } 
     \Big) 
     \nonumber 
     \\[0,3 cm ] 
     = 
     { 1\over 2 } 
     \phi_{\pmb{p},\pmb{h},G } 
     \big (
     \mathds{1}_{\{x\not\leftrightarrow y\ } } 
     \cdot 
     \big\ { 
     1 
     + 
     \tanh\left(\pmb{h}(K_t)\right) 
     \cdot 
     \tanh\left(\pmb{h}(K_u)\right) 
     \big\ } 
     \big). 
     \end{gathered}$$ Replacing the last expression in we get that $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 \label{I-2 - 1 } 
     I_2 
     = 
     { 1\over 2 } 
     \phi_{\pmb{p},\pmb{h},G } 
     \big (
     \mathds{1}_{\{x\not\leftrightarrow y\ } } 
     \cdot 
     \tanh\left(\pmb{h}(K_t)\right) 
     \cdot 
     \tanh\left(\pmb{h}(K_u)\right) 
     \big). 
     \end{aligned}$$ Since $ \tau_{2\beta,\pmb{h},2,V}(x, y)=I_1+I_2 $, the theorem follow. 

 detect that in the absence of the magnetic field, i.e. $ \pmb{h}\equiv 0 $, the conclusion of the Theorem \[Correlação / quase - conectividade\ ] reduce to $ $ \tau_{2\beta,0,2,V}(x, y)= 
     { 1\over 2}\phi_{\pmb{p},0,G}(x\leftrightarrow y), 
     \quad \forall x, y\in V$$ which is a well known identity for the Ising / Potts model with $ q=2 $, experience [ @Grimmett2 ] Theorem 1.16, p. 11. 

 \[col\ ] The tailspin - spin correlation of the Ising model on the finite
(\pmb{j}(K_t)+\pmb{h}(K_u)\right)
        \ovtr 
        \cosh\leyr(\pmb{h}(K_v)\right)\csot\cosh
        \left(\pmb{h}(K_u)\right)
    }
    \Vig)
    \nonumber
    \\[0,3cm]
    =
    {1\over 2}
    \phi_{\pmb{p},\pmb{i},G}
    \big(
    \matiss{1}_{\{x\not\lcytriggbarroc b\}}
    \cdot
    \bin\{
    1
    +
    \tanh\left(\pmb{h}(N_t)\fiyht)
    \cdot
    \tanh\left(\pmb{h}(K_u)\right)
    \big\}
    \hig).
    \end{gathgred}$$ Ge[lacjng the last expression in we get fhat $$\bejin{aligned}
\label{O-2-1}
    I_2
    =
    {1\over 2}
    \phi_{\omb{p},\omb{h},G}
    \big(
    \mahhds{1}_{\{x\not\lefjdigrrarrow y\}}
    \zdot
    \tanh\left(\pmb{h}(K_t)\tight)
    \cdot 
    \tanh\left(\pmb{h}(K_u)\fight)
    \big).
    \ebd{aphgned}$$ Since $\tau_{2\bvta,\pmb{h},2,V}(x,y)=I_1+I_2$, bne themrem foklows.

Notice thst mn tye absence of the magietic field, i.e. $\pmb{h}\ezuiv 0$, the cknclusion of the Rhworem \[Corselaçãu/wuare-cknxctjvidadf\] rxduces to $$\tzu_{2\beta,0,2,V}(x,y)=
    {1\over 2}\phi_{\pmb{p},0,G}(x\lefuridytarrow y),
    \suad \fjrwll x,y\in V$$ which is a well known identiuy fod the Ising/Potts model qith $q=2$, see [@Grimmett2] Tjeorem 1.16, p. 11.

\[col\] The spin-spin correlation of the Ising model mn thx winnbc
(\pmb{h}(K_t)+\pmb{h}(K_u)\right) \over \cosh\left(\pmb{h}(K_t)\right)\cdot\cosh \left(\pmb{h}(K_u)\right) } \Big) \nonumber {1\over \phi_{\pmb{p},\pmb{h},G} \big( y\}} \cdot \big\{ \big\} \end{gathered}$$ Replacing the expression in we that $$\begin{aligned} \label{I-2-1} I_2 = {1\over \phi_{\pmb{p},\pmb{h},G} \big( \mathds{1}_{\{x\not\leftrightarrow y\}} \cdot \tanh\left(\pmb{h}(K_t)\right) \cdot \tanh\left(\pmb{h}(K_u)\right) \big). \end{aligned}$$ Since $\tau_{2\beta,\pmb{h},2,V}(x,y)=I_1+I_2$, the follows. Notice that in the absence of the magnetic field, i.e. $\pmb{h}\equiv 0$, conclusion the \[Correlação/quase-conectividade\] to $$\tau_{2\beta,0,2,V}(x,y)= {1\over 2}\phi_{\pmb{p},0,G}(x\leftrightarrow y), \quad \forall x,y\in V$$ which is a well known identity for Ising/Potts model with $q=2$, see [@Grimmett2] Theorem 1.16, 11. \[col\] The spin-spin of the Ising model on finite
(\pmb{h}(K_t)+\pmb{h}(K_u)\right)
        \over 
        \cosh\Left(\pmb{h}(K_t)\Right)\CdoT\coSh
        \Left(\Pmb{h}(k_u)\right)
    }
    \Big)
    \nonuMBer
    \\[0,3cM]
    =
    {1\over 2}
    \phi_{\pmb{p},\pmb{h},G}
    \big(
    \maThds{1}_{\{x\NoT\LeftRIgHtarrOw y\}}
    \cdot
    \BIg\{
    1
    +
    \TANh\lEfT(\pMb{h}(k_t)\RIgHt)
    \cdoT
    \taNh\left(\pMb{h}(K_u)\right)
    \Big\}
    \BiG).
    \end{gathered}$$ rEpLacing the lAst Expression in We gEt that $$\BeGin{ALigneD}
\laBel{I-2-1}
    I_2
    =
    {1\Over 2}
    \phI_{\Pmb{p},\pmB{h},G}
    \big(
    \matHdS{1}_{\{X\not\leFTrightaRROw Y\}}
    \cdoT
    \tanh\left(\pmb{h}(K_t)\riGHt)
    \CDot 
    \tanh\left(\pmb{H}(K_u)\rigHt)
    \BIg).
    \END{alIgnEd}$$ Since $\tau_{2\BeTa,\pmb{H},2,v}(x,y)=I_1+I_2$, thE ThEOREm fOLlows.

Notice thAt in the abseNCe oF the maGnEtiC Field, i.E. $\pmb{h}\EqUIv 0$, tHe conclusioN of tHe Theorem \[correlAÇão/quasE-ConectiVidade\] RedUceS to $$\tAU_{2\bEtA,0,2,V}(x,Y)=
    {1\oVEr 2}\pHI_{\pMb{p},0,g}(X\leFtrightaRrOw Y),
    \quad \ForaLL X,Y\In V$$ wHicH is a Well kNown identity fOr tHe IsINg/POtts mOdel wIth $q=2$, SeE [@GrimMett2] ThEorem 1.16, P. 11.

\[cOl\] The spin-spin coRrelAtion of thE IsInG moDeL on thE Finite
(\pmb{h}(K_t)+\pmb{h}(K_u) \right)
      \o ver        \cosh\left(\pm b {h}( K_t)\right)\cdot\cosh     \lef t (\ pmb{h }(K_u)\ r ig h t )
  } 
  \ Bi g)
   \ nonumbe r
    \\[0 ,3c m] 
    =
    { 1 \o ver 2}
   \p hi_{\pmb{p}, \pm b{h},G }  \big( 
   \ma thds{1 } _{\{x\ not\leftr ig h tarrow y\}}
 \c dot    \big\{
    1 +
    \tanh\le ft(\pm b{ h }( K _ t)\ rig ht)
    \c do t
  \tanh\l e ft ( \ p mb{ h }(K_u)\right) 
    \big\}    \big) .  \end{g ather ed } $$Replacing t he l ast expre ssioni n we ge t  that $ $\begi n{a lig ned} \l ab el{ I- 2 -1}    I _ 2
   =
   { 1\ over2}
\ phi_ {\p mb{p },\pm b{h},G}
    \ big (
  \m athds {1}_{ \{x\ no t\lef tright arrow  y \}}
    \cdot
   \ tanh\left (\p mb {h} (K _t)\r i ght)
  \cd ot 
   \tanh\ l eft (\ p m b {h }(K_u)\right)
   \b i g ). 
    \en d{alig n ed }$ $  Since $ \t au_ {2\b e t a,\pm b{h} , 2, V}(x,y)= I_1+I_ 2 $,  t he theo re m foll ow s.
No ticet hatin the  absence  of t h e magnetic fie l d, i.e. $\pmb { h} \ e qu i v 0$ , t he conclusi on o f  the  The o re m \ [ Corre lação /q u as e -conectividade\] re du ces to  $$\t au_{2\beta,0, 2,V}(x,y)=   {1\ove r 2} \ ph i _{\pmb{p},0,G} (x\le ftrightarr o w y),
   \qu ad \fora ll x,y\in V $$ which  is  awel l k n o wn  identity for t he I si ng/Pott s m odel wi th$q= 2$,  se e[@Grimmet t2] Theo re m1. 16 , p . 11. 
\[col\]  T hesp in- spinc orrela tionof t he  I s ing  modelo nt h e fi ni te 
(\pmb{h}(K_t)+\pmb{h}(K_u)\right)
 _ _   _\over 
__ __  _\cosh\left(\pmb{h}(K_t)\right)\cdot\cosh
  _   _ \left(\pmb{h}(K_u)\right)
 __ }
    \Big)
    \nonumber
    \\[0,3cm]
__ _=
__  {1\over 2}
 _  \phi_{\pmb{p},\pmb{h},G}
  _ \big(
_   \mathds{1}_{\{x\not\leftrightarrow y\}}
   _\cdot
_  _\big\{
    1
    +
_   \tanh\left(\pmb{h}(K_t)\right)
  _ \cdot
 ___\tanh\left(\pmb{h}(K_u)\right)
   _\big\}
    \big).
 _  \end{gathered}$$ Replacing the last_expression in we get that $$\begin{aligned}
\label{I-2-1}
 _  I_2
   _=
    {1\over_2}
 _  \phi_{\pmb{p},\pmb{h},G}
  _ \big(
 _ _\mathds{1}_{\{x\not\leftrightarrow y\}}
 _  \cdot
   _\tanh\left(\pmb{h}(K_t)\right)
  _ \cdot 
   _\tanh\left(\pmb{h}(K_u)\right)
_  _\big).
__ _\end{aligned}$$ Since $\tau_{2\beta,\pmb{h},2,V}(x,y)=I_1+I_2$,_the_theorem follows.

Notice_that_in the absence of the magnetic_field,_i.e. $\pmb{h}\equiv 0$, the conclusion of the_Theorem \[Correlação/quase-conectividade\] reduces to_$$\tau_{2\beta,0,2,V}(x,y)=
_   {1\over_2}\phi_{\pmb{p},0,G}(x\leftrightarrow y),
   _\quad \forall x,y\in V$$ which is_a well_known identity_for the Ising/Potts model with $q=2$, see [@Grimmett2] Theorem 1.16, p._11.

\[col\] The spin-spin correlation of the_Ising model on the_finite