x;{\boldsymbol}{\lambda})
  =\phi_{\text{v}}(x;{\boldsymbol}{\lambda}),{\nonumber}\\
&\Delta_{\text{v}}^+=-h+\text{v}>0,\quad 
\Delta_{\text{v}}^-=-\Delta_{\text{v}}^+<0,
\quad
  \tilde{\mathcal{E}}^{\text{os}}_{\text{v}}({\boldsymbol}{\lambda})
  <\mathcal{E}_0({\boldsymbol}{\lambda}) \quad(\text{v}>2h).
      \label{solpv2}\end{aligned}$$

#### Deformed scatterings

A pseudo (‘pseudo’) virtual state wavefunction will add a new discrete eigenstate at its energy. It is trivial to verify that the pseudo and ‘pseudo’ virtual wavefunctions will add a pole on the positive imaginary $k$-axis at $k=i(\text{v}+h+1)$, $k=i(\text{v}-h)$, respectively, with exactly the same energy of the employed seed solution, $-(h+\text{v}+1)^2$ and $-(\text{v}-h)^2$, respectively. For both the pseudo and ‘pseudo’ virtual wavefunctions, $\Delta_\text{v}^+=-\Delta_\text{v}^-$. This means that the deformation factors of the transmission and reflection amplitudes are the same except for a sign $(-1)^M$: $$\frac{t_{\mathcal D}(k;{\boldsymbol}{\lambda})}{t(k;{\boldsymbol}{\lambda})}=(-1)^M\frac{r_{\mathcal D}(k;{\boldsymbol}{\lambda})}{r(k;{\boldsymbol}{\lambda})}=
\prod_{j=1}^M\frac{k-i\Delta_{d_j}^-}{k+i\Delta_{d_j}^-}.$$

Hyperbolic symmetric top ${\text{{\uppercase\expandafter{\romannumeral2}}}}$ {#sec:hst}
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

#### Original system

The system has finitely many discrete eigenstates $0\le n\le n_\text{max}({\boldsymbol}{\lambda})=[h]'$ in the specified parameter range: $$\begin{aligned}
  &{\boldsymbol}{\lambda}=(h,\mu),\quad {\boldsymbol}{\delta}=(-1,0),\quad
  -\infty<x<\infty,\quad h,\mu>0,\\
  &U(x;{\boldsymbol}{\
x;{\boldsymbol}{\lambda }) 
   = \phi_{\text{v}}(x;{\boldsymbol}{\lambda}),{\nonumber}\\ 
 & \Delta_{\text{v}}^+=-h+\text{v}>0,\quad 
 \Delta_{\text{v}}^-=-\Delta_{\text{v}}^+<0, 
 \quad 
   \tilde{\mathcal{E}}^{\text{os}}_{\text{v}}({\boldsymbol}{\lambda }) 
   < \mathcal{E}_0({\boldsymbol}{\lambda }) \quad(\text{v}>2h). 
       \label{solpv2}\end{aligned}$$ 

 # # # # Deformed scatterings 

 A pseudo (‘ pseudo ’) virtual department of state wavefunction will lend a new discrete eigenstate at its energy. It is trivial to affirm that the pseudo and ‘ pseudo ’ virtual wavefunctions will total a perch on the positive imaginary $ k$-axis at $ k = i(\text{v}+h+1)$, $ k = i(\text{v}-h)$, respectively, with precisely the same energy of the use seed solution, $ -(h+\text{v}+1)^2 $ and $ -(\text{v}-h)^2 $, respectively. For both the pseudo and ‘ pseudo ’ virtual wavefunctions, $ \Delta_\text{v}^+=-\Delta_\text{v}^-$. This means that the deformation factor of the transmission and reflection amplitudes are the like except for a sign $ (-1)^M$: $ $ \frac{t_{\mathcal D}(k;{\boldsymbol}{\lambda})}{t(k;{\boldsymbol}{\lambda})}=(-1)^M\frac{r_{\mathcal D}(k;{\boldsymbol}{\lambda})}{r(k;{\boldsymbol}{\lambda})}= 
 \prod_{j=1}^M\frac{k - i\Delta_{d_j}^-}{k+i\Delta_{d_j}^-}.$$ 

 Hyperbolic symmetric top $ { \text{{\uppercase\expandafter{\romannumeral2}}}}$ { # sec: hst } 
 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

 # # # # Original system 

 The arrangement has finitely many discrete eigenstates $ 0\le n\le n_\text{max}({\boldsymbol}{\lambda})=[h]'$ in the specified argument range: $ $ \begin{aligned } 
   & { \boldsymbol}{\lambda}=(h,\mu),\quad { \boldsymbol}{\delta}=(-1,0),\quad 
   -\infty < x<\infty,\quad h,\mu>0,\\ 
   & U(x;{\boldsymbol}{\
x;{\bopdsymbol}{\lambda})
  =\phi_{\text{v}}(w;{\boldsymbol}{\lambdc}),{\bonumbxr}\\
&\Delta_{\fext{v}}^+=-h+\tebt{v}>0,\quad 
\Delta_{\text{v}}^-=-\Delta_{\text{v}}^+<0,
\euqd
  \tulde{\mathcal{E}}^{\text{os}}_{\text{x}}({\boldsymbll}{\lambda})
  <\mauhcal{E}_0({\boldsymbol}{\lejbda}) \quad(\text{b}>2m).
      \label{solpv2}\end{sligned}$$

#### Dexormed scatterhnes

C pseudo (‘pseudo’) virtual state wavefugction eipl add a new dyscrtte eigsnstate at its energy. It is triviam to vegify that the pseido and ‘pseudo’ virtual wavffunftions will add a oole on the posyrive imaginafy $k$-axis au $n=i(\text{v}+h+1)$, $k=j(\text{v}-h)$, respectively, with exactuy thz same enerty of jhe employed seed solution, $-(h+\tcqt{v}+1)^2$ and $-(\text{v}-h)^2$, respectively. Nor bmth the pseudo and ‘pseudm’ virtual wavefuncjions, $\Deltd_\tzxt{v}^+=-\Delta_\text{v}^-$. This mwabs thdt tve dddoroatjoi fzctors of the transjission and reflection amplitucef are the same excepe sor a sign $(-1)^M$: $$\frac{t_{\mathcal D}(k;{\boldsymbol}{\ldmbsa})}{t(k;{\boldsymbol}{\lambda})}=(-1)^M\frqc{r_{\mathcal D}(k;{\boldsymbll}{\lambda})}{r(h;{\boldsymbol}{\lambda})}=
\prod_{j=1}^M\frac{k-i\Delta_{d_j}^-}{k+i\Delta_{d_j}^-}.$$

Hypesbolir rymnebric roo ${\text{{\uppercase\expandafter{\romannumeral2}}}}$ {#sec:hst}
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

#### Krogpnal system

The syftem has fimiheki many discretg eigenstafes $0\le n\le n_\text{mad}({\boldsyibol}{\lqmbda})=[h]'$ in the specified parameter range: $$\vegin{aligned}
  &{\boldsymbol}{\lambda}=(h,\lu),\quad {\boldrymbpl}{\delya}=(-1,0),\quad
  -\infty<x<\infty,\quad h,\mu>0,\\
  &U(x;{\boldsymhol}{\
x;{\boldsymbol}{\lambda}) =\phi_{\text{v}}(x;{\boldsymbol}{\lambda}),{\nonumber}\\ &\Delta_{\text{v}}^+=-h+\text{v}>0,\quad \Delta_{\text{v}}^-=-\Delta_{\text{v}}^+<0, \quad \tilde{\mathcal{E}}^{\text{os}}_{\text{v}}({\boldsymbol}{\lambda}) <\mathcal{E}_0({\boldsymbol}{\lambda}) #### scatterings A (‘pseudo’) virtual state discrete at its energy. is trivial to that the pseudo and ‘pseudo’ virtual will add a pole on the positive imaginary $k$-axis at $k=i(\text{v}+h+1)$, $k=i(\text{v}-h)$, respectively, exactly the same energy of the employed seed solution, $-(h+\text{v}+1)^2$ and $-(\text{v}-h)^2$, respectively. both pseudo ‘pseudo’ wavefunctions, $\Delta_\text{v}^+=-\Delta_\text{v}^-$. This means that the deformation factors of the transmission and reflection amplitudes are the except for a sign $(-1)^M$: $$\frac{t_{\mathcal D}(k;{\boldsymbol}{\lambda})}{t(k;{\boldsymbol}{\lambda})}=(-1)^M\frac{r_{\mathcal D}(k;{\boldsymbol}{\lambda})}{r(k;{\boldsymbol}{\lambda})}= Hyperbolic symmetric top ${\text{{\uppercase\expandafter{\romannumeral2}}}}$ ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- #### Original system The has many discrete $0\le n_\text{max}({\boldsymbol}{\lambda})=[h]'$ the specified parameter $$\begin{aligned} &{\boldsymbol}{\lambda}=(h,\mu),\quad {\boldsymbol}{\delta}=(-1,0),\quad -\infty<x<\infty,\quad h,\mu>0,\\ &U(x;{\boldsymbol}{\
x;{\boldsymbol}{\lambda})
  =\phi_{\text{v}}(X;{\boldsymboL}{\lambDa}),{\nOnuMbEr}\\
&\DeLta_{\tExt{v}}^+=-h+\text{v}>0,\quad 
\dElta_{\Text{v}}^-=-\Delta_{\text{v}}^+<0,
\quad
  \tilDe{\matHcAL{E}}^{\teXT{oS}}_{\text{V}}({\boldsyMBoL}{\LAmbDa})
  <\MaThcAl{e}_0({\BoLdsymBol}{\Lambda}) \qUad(\text{v}>2h).
      \lAbeL{sOlpv2}\end{alignED}$$

#### DEformed scaTteRings

A pseudo (‘PseUdo’) virTuAl sTAte waVefUnctiOn will ADd a new Discrete eIgENstate AT its eneRGY. IT is tRivial to verify thaT ThE Pseudo and ‘pseudO’ virtuAl WAvEFUncTioNs will add a PoLe on tHE positiVE iMAGInaRY $k$-axis at $k=i(\texT{v}+h+1)$, $k=i(\text{v}-h)$, REspEctiveLy, WitH ExactlY the sAmE EneRgy of the empLoyeD seed soluTion, $-(h+\tEXt{v}+1)^2$ and $-(\tEXt{v}-h)^2$, resPectivEly. for Both THe PsEudO aND ‘psEUdO’ viRTuaL wavefunCtIoNs, $\DelTa_\teXT{V}^+=-\dElta_\TexT{v}^-$. ThIs meaNs that the defoRmaTion FActOrs of The trAnsmIsSion aNd reflEctioN aMplitudes are the Same Except for A siGn $(-1)^m$: $$\frAc{T_{\mathCAl D}(k;{\boLdsYmbOl}{\lambdA})}{t(k;{\boldSYmbOl}{\LAMBdA})}=(-1)^M\frac{r_{\mathcal D}(k;{\boLdSYMbOl}{\lambda})}{R(k;{\boldSYmBoL}{\Lambda})}=
\prOd_{J=1}^M\fRac{k-I\dElta_{d_J}^-}{k+i\DELtA_{d_j}^-}.$$

HyperBolic sYMmEtRic top ${\tExT{{\upperCaSe\eXpaNdaftER{\romAnnumeRal2}}}}$ {#sec:hsT}
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

#### OrigINal system

The sySTem has finitelY MaNY DiSCretE eiGenstates $0\le N\le n_\TExt{mAx}({\boLDsYmbOL}{\lambDa})=[h]'$ in ThE SpECified parameter rangE: $$\bEgin{alIgned}
  &{\Boldsymbol}{\lamBda}=(h,\mu),\quad {\BOLDsymbol}{\dElta}=(-1,0),\QUaD
  -\Infty<x<\infty,\quaD h,\mu>0,\\
  &U(X;{\boldsymboL}{\
x;{\boldsymbol}{\lambda})  =\phi_{\ text{ v}} (x; {\ bold symb ol}{\lambda}), { \non umber}\\
&\Delta_{\tex t{v}} ^+ = -h+\ t ex t{v}> 0,\quad 
\ D e lta _{ \t ext {v } }^ -=-\D elt a_{\tex t{v}}^+<0, 
\q ua d
  \tilde{\ m at hcal{E}}^{ \te xt{os}}_{\te xt{ v}}({\ bo lds y mbol} {\l ambda })
  < \ mathca l{E}_0({\ bo l dsymbo l }{\lamb d a })  \qu ad(\text{v}>2h).   \label{solpv 2}\end {a l ig n e d}$ $
#### Defor me d sca t terings 
A p s eud o  (‘pseudo’) v irtual stat e  wa vefunc ti onw ill ad d a n ew dis crete eigen stat e at itsenergy .  It ist rivialto ver ify  th at t h eps eud oa nd‘ ps eud o ’ v irtual w av ef uncti onsw i l l  add  apole  on t he positive i mag inar y  $k $-axi s at$k=i (\ text{ v}+h+1 )$, $ k= i(\text{v}-h)$,  res pectively , w it h e xa ctlyt he sam e e ner gy of t he empl o yed  s e e d  s olution, $-(h+\tex t{ v } +1 )^2$ and  $-(\t e xt {v } -h)^2$,re spe ctiv e l y. Fo r bo t hthe pseu do and ‘p se udo’ vi rt ual wa ve fun cti ons,$ \Del ta_\te xt{v}^+= -\Del t a_\text{v}^-$. This means th a tt h ed efor mat ion factors  oft he t rans m is sio n  andrefle ct i on amplitudes are thesa me exc ept f or a sign $(- 1)^M$: $$\ f r a c{t_{\ma thca l  D } (k;{\boldsymbo l}{\l ambda})}{t ( k;{\bold symbo l}{\lamb da})}=(-1 ) ^ M\frac{r _{\ mat hca l D } ( k; {\boldsymbol} { \ lamb da })}{r(k ;{\ boldsym bol }{\ lam bda }) }=
\prod_ {j=1}^M\ fr ac {k -i \De lta_{ d _j}^-}{k +i \De lt a_{ d_j}^ - }.$$
Hyper boli csy m met ric top ${ \ t ext{ {\ up perc ase \e xpand afte r {\r omannum eral2}}}} $ { # sec: hs t} 
------ ------------- -- ---------- -- --- ------ - - -------- ----------------------- - 

####Ori ginal  sys tem

Thesys tem ha s f i nitely  manydiscr et e e i g ensta t e s$0\ le  n\le n_\t e x t{m ax}({ \b olds ymbol}{ \lambda})=[h]'$ in the  specified pa ram eter r an ge: $$ \ beg in { ali g n ed}
  &{\boldsy mbol}{\lam bd a }= (h,\mu),\q u ad{\ boldsym bol}{\d elta} = (-1,0), \quad
  - \infty<x< \i nfty , \ qua d h,\mu>0, \\
  &U( x;{\bolds y mbol} { \
x;{\boldsymbol}{\lambda})
 _=\phi_{\text{v}}(x;{\boldsymbol}{\lambda}),{\nonumber}\\
&\Delta_{\text{v}}^+=-h+\text{v}>0,\quad 
\Delta_{\text{v}}^-=-\Delta_{\text{v}}^+<0,
\quad
_ \tilde{\mathcal{E}}^{\text{os}}_{\text{v}}({\boldsymbol}{\lambda})
  <\mathcal{E}_0({\boldsymbol}{\lambda})_\quad(\text{v}>2h).
 __ __\label{solpv2}\end{aligned}$$

#### Deformed scatterings

A_pseudo (‘pseudo’) virtual_state wavefunction will add_a new discrete_eigenstate_at its energy. It is trivial to verify that the pseudo and ‘pseudo’ virtual_wavefunctions_will add_a_pole_on the positive imaginary $k$-axis_at $k=i(\text{v}+h+1)$, $k=i(\text{v}-h)$, respectively, with_exactly the_same energy of the employed seed solution, $-(h+\text{v}+1)^2$_and_$-(\text{v}-h)^2$, respectively. For_both the pseudo and ‘pseudo’ virtual wavefunctions, $\Delta_\text{v}^+=-\Delta_\text{v}^-$. This_means that the deformation factors of_the transmission and_reflection_amplitudes_are the same except_for a sign $(-1)^M$: $$\frac{t_{\mathcal D}(k;{\boldsymbol}{\lambda})}{t(k;{\boldsymbol}{\lambda})}=(-1)^M\frac{r_{\mathcal_D}(k;{\boldsymbol}{\lambda})}{r(k;{\boldsymbol}{\lambda})}=
\prod_{j=1}^M\frac{k-i\Delta_{d_j}^-}{k+i\Delta_{d_j}^-}.$$

Hyperbolic symmetric top ${\text{{\uppercase\expandafter{\romannumeral2}}}}$ {#sec:hst}
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

#### Original_system

The system has finitely many discrete eigenstates_$0\le n\le n_\text{max}({\boldsymbol}{\lambda})=[h]'$ in the specified_parameter range: $$\begin{aligned}
  &{\boldsymbol}{\lambda}=(h,\mu),\quad_{\boldsymbol}{\delta}=(-1,0),\quad
 _-\infty<x<\infty,\quad h,\mu>0,\\
  &U(x;{\boldsymbol}{\