$ as the initial value. Furthermore, the optimization process only permits the estimation of the probability of a nucleotide of type $j$ joining a nucleotide of type $i$ relative to the probability of a nucleotide of type $k$ joining a nucleotide of type $i$. In order that $\aleph(n)$ be comparable in a meaningful way between different numerical experiments, it was scaled after the optimization procedure to have the sum of all of its elements equal to ten.

We found that the vectors $\mu(n)$ estimated for each matrix $P(n)$ generally satisfy the property ($H1$). The mean absolute difference between $\mu_i(n)$ and $\mu_{\alpha(i)}(n)$ was found to be 0.0254, while the median absolute difference was 0.0198. Furthermore, we computed the average $$\bar{\aleph}=\left(\begin{matrix}
 \displaystyle   0.7217  & \displaystyle 0.5236  & \displaystyle 0.5908  & \displaystyle 0.6672\\
 \displaystyle   0.6815  & \displaystyle 0.6055  & \displaystyle 0.6138  & \displaystyle 0.5986\\
 \displaystyle   0.6507  & \displaystyle 0.7187  & \displaystyle 0.6035  & \displaystyle 0.5304\\
 \displaystyle   0.4548  & \displaystyle 0.6420  & \displaystyle 0.6758  & \displaystyle 0.7213\\
    \end{matrix}\right)$$ of all 1049 estimated matrices $\aleph(n)$. To assess whether or not we can interpret $\bar{\aleph}$ as having Property ($H2$), we estimated $\aleph(n)$, $\mu(n)$ and $t(n)$ again, this time imposing the restrictions stipulated by ($H1$) and ($H2$). In this case we obtained the following average: $$\bar{\bar{\aleph}}=\left(\begin{matrix}
 \displaystyle   0.7515 & \displaystyle   0.4807 & \displaystyle   0.5583 & \displaystyle   0.6785\\
 \displaystyle   0.6942 & \displaystyle   0.5584 & \displaystyle   0.6141 & \displaystyle   0.5583\\
 \displaystyle   0.6722 & \displaystyle   0.7407 & \displaystyle   0.5584 & \
$ as the initial value. Furthermore, the optimization process only permits the estimation of the probability of a nucleotide of character $ j$ join a nucleotide of type $ i$ relative to the probability of a nucleotide of character   $ k$ joining a nucleotide of character   $ i$. In order that $ \aleph(n)$ be comparable in a meaningful room between unlike numerical experiments, it was scaled after the optimization procedure to have the union of all of its elements equal to ten. 

 We find oneself that the vectors $ \mu(n)$ estimated for each matrix $ P(n)$ generally satisfy the property ($ H1 $). The mean absolute deviation between $ \mu_i(n)$ and $ \mu_{\alpha(i)}(n)$ was found to be 0.0254, while the median absolute difference was 0.0198. Furthermore, we calculate the average $ $ \bar{\aleph}=\left(\begin{matrix } 
  \displaystyle    0.7217   & \displaystyle 0.5236   & \displaystyle 0.5908   & \displaystyle 0.6672\\ 
  \displaystyle    0.6815   & \displaystyle 0.6055   & \displaystyle 0.6138   & \displaystyle 0.5986\\ 
  \displaystyle    0.6507   & \displaystyle 0.7187   & \displaystyle 0.6035   & \displaystyle 0.5304\\ 
  \displaystyle    0.4548   & \displaystyle 0.6420   & \displaystyle 0.6758   & \displaystyle 0.7213\\ 
     \end{matrix}\right)$$ of all 1049 estimated matrix $ \aleph(n)$. To assess whether or not we can rede $ \bar{\aleph}$ as having Property ($ H2 $), we estimated   $ \aleph(n)$, $ \mu(n)$ and $ t(n)$ again, this time imposing the restriction stipulated by ($ H1 $) and ($ H2 $). In this case we obtained the following average: $ $ \bar{\bar{\aleph}}=\left(\begin{matrix } 
  \displaystyle    0.7515 & \displaystyle    0.4807 & \displaystyle    0.5583 & \displaystyle    0.6785\\ 
  \displaystyle    0.6942 & \displaystyle    0.5584 & \displaystyle    0.6141 & \displaystyle    0.5583\\ 
  \displaystyle    0.6722 & \displaystyle    0.7407 & \displaystyle    0.5584 & \
$ as the initial value. Furthtrmore, the optimiearion pcocess knly peroits the estimation of the pcobavilitt of a nucleotide of thpe $j$ joijing a nycleiride of ty's $i$ relative fl thz 'robability of s nucleotige of type $k$ johnkny a nucleotide of type $i$. In order thae $\aleph(m)$ he comparable yn a ieanjngful way between different numerjcal exkeriments, it was svaled after the optimizatiln pgocedure to have tje sum of aol os its elementr equal to ten.

We found that the vectors $\mu(n)$ estimated for zach matrix $P(b)$ gfterally satmsfy tre property ($M1$). The maan absplute differenge bevweeb $\mu_i(n)$ and $\mu_{\alpha(i)}(n)$ xas found to be 0.0254, whije the megicn absolute differencw qas 0.0198. Xurtvermuee, de dokphted tje everage $$\bar{\zleph}=\left(\betin{matrix}
 \displaystulq   0.7217  & \displayatyle 0.5236  & \displaystyle 0.5908  & \displaystyle 0.6672\\
 \displaysuyle   0.6815  & \displaystyle 0.6055  & \diwplaystyle 0.6138  & \displaydtyle 0.5986\\
 \difplaystyle   0.6507  & \displaystyle 0.7187  & \displaystyle 0.6035  & \dhsplabsgylt 0.5304\\
 \dispuqydtyle   0.4548  & \displaystyle 0.6420  & \displaystyle 0.6758  & \difllsyxtyle 0.7213\\
    \end{mctrix}\right)$$ of alk 1049 exjimated matricgs $\alepk(h)$. Fo assess whether lr not re cab interprtt $\bat{\aleph}$ as having Property ($H2$), we estimateb $\alwph(n)$, $\mu(n)$ and $t(n)$ agcin, this timz impoxing yhe restrictions stipulcted bg ($H1$) and ($H2$). Ij this caad we obtained thd fplnowing average: $$\bar{\bar{\aleph}}=\jeft(\begin{natrnx}
 \displxystile   0.7515 & \displaystjle   0.4807 & \displaystyle   0.5583 & \disppafstyle   0.6785\\
 \fisplaystyle   0.6942 & \displaystyle   0.5584 & \displaystylg   0.6141 & \gisplayscyle   0.5583\\
 \displaystylq   0.6722 & \displaysjyle   0.7407 & \bisplahstyle   0.5584 & \
$ as the initial value. Furthermore, the only the estimation the probability of joining nucleotide of type relative to the of a nucleotide of type $k$ a nucleotide of type $i$. In order that $\aleph(n)$ be comparable in a way between different numerical experiments, it was scaled after the optimization procedure to the of of elements equal to ten. We found that the vectors $\mu(n)$ estimated for each matrix $P(n)$ generally the property ($H1$). The mean absolute difference between and $\mu_{\alpha(i)}(n)$ was found be 0.0254, while the median difference 0.0198. Furthermore, computed average \displaystyle 0.7217 & 0.5236 & \displaystyle 0.5908 & \displaystyle 0.6672\\ \displaystyle 0.6815 & \displaystyle 0.6055 & \displaystyle 0.6138 & \displaystyle \displaystyle 0.6507 0.7187 & 0.6035 \displaystyle \displaystyle 0.4548 & & \displaystyle 0.6758 & \displaystyle 0.7213\\ 1049 estimated matrices $\aleph(n)$. To assess whether or we can $\bar{\aleph}$ as having Property ($H2$), we $\aleph(n)$, $\mu(n)$ and $t(n)$ again, this time imposing restrictions stipulated by ($H1$) and ($H2$). In this case we obtained the following average: $$\bar{\bar{\aleph}}=\left(\begin{matrix} & \displaystyle 0.4807 & 0.5583 & \displaystyle \displaystyle & 0.5584 \displaystyle 0.6141 \displaystyle 0.5583\\ \displaystyle 0.6722 & \displaystyle 0.7407 & \displaystyle 0.5584 &
$ as the initial value. FurthermOre, the optiMizatIon ProCeSs onLy peRmits the estimaTIon oF the probability of a nuclEotidE oF Type $J$ JoIning A nucleoTIdE OF tyPe $I$ rElaTiVE tO the pRobAbility Of a nucleotIde Of Type $k$ joining A NuCleotide of TypE $i$. In order thaT $\alEph(n)$ be CoMpaRAble iN a mEaninGful waY BetweeN differenT nUMericaL ExperimENTs, It waS scaled after the opTImIZation procedurE to havE tHE sUM Of aLl oF its elemenTs Equal TO ten.

We fOUnD THAt tHE vectors $\mu(n)$ esTimated for eACh mAtrix $P(N)$ gEneRAlly saTisfy ThE ProPerty ($H1$). The meAn abSolute difFerencE Between $\MU_i(n)$ and $\mU_{\alpha(I)}(n)$ wAs fOund TO bE 0.0254, wHilE tHE meDIaN abSOluTe differEnCe Was 0.0198. FuRtheRMORE, we cOmpUted The avErage $$\bar{\aleph}=\LefT(\begIN{maTrix}
 \dIsplaYstyLe   0.7217  & \DisplAystylE 0.5236  & \dispLaYstyle 0.5908  & \displaystYle 0.6672\\
 \dIsplaystyLe   0.6815  & \dIsPlaYsTyle 0.6055  & \dISplaysTylE 0.6138  & \diSplaystYle 0.5986\\
 \dispLAysTyLE   0.6507  & \DIsPlaystyle 0.7187  & \displaystYlE 0.6035  & \DIsPlaystylE 0.5304\\
 \displAYsTyLE   0.4548  & \displayStYle 0.6420  & \DispLAYstylE 0.6758  & \disPLaYstyle 0.7213\\
    \enD{matriX}\RiGhT)$$ of all 1049 eStImated MaTriCes $\Aleph(N)$. to asSess whEther or nOt we cAN interpret $\bar{\aLEph}$ as having PrOPeRTY ($H2$), WE estImaTed $\aleph(n)$, $\mu(N)$ and $T(N)$ agaIn, thIS tIme IMposiNg the ReSTrICtions stipulated by ($H1$) AnD ($H2$). In thIs casE we obtained thE following AVERage: $$\bar{\bAr{\alEPh}}=\LEft(\begin{matrix}
 \DisplAystyle   0.7515 & \disPLaystyle   0.4807 & \DisplAystyle   0.5583 & \dIsplaystyLE   0.6785\\
 \DisplaysTylE   0.6942 & \diSplAysTYLe   0.5584 & \Displaystyle   0.6141 & \dISPlayStYle   0.5583\\
 \dispLayStyle   0.6722 & \diSplAysTylE   0.7407 & \diSpLaystyle   0.5584 & \
$ as the initial value. Fu rthermore,  theopt imi za tion  pro cess only perm i ts t he estimation of the p robab il i ty o f  a  nucl eotideo ft y pe$j $joi ni n ga nuc leo tide of  type $i$rel at ive to the p r ob ability of  anucleotide o f t ype $k $joi n ing a  nu cleot ide of type $ i$. In or de r  that$ \aleph( n ) $be c omparable in a me a ni n gful way betwe en dif fe r en t num eri cal experi me nts,i t was s c al e d aft e r the optimiz ation proce d ure  to ha ve  th e  sum o f all  o f  it s elementsequa l to ten. 

We f o und tha t  the ve ctors$\m u(n )$ e s ti ma ted  f o r e a ch  ma t rix  $P(n)$ge ne rally  sat i s f y  the  pr oper ty ($ H1$). The mea n a bsol u tediffe rence  bet we en $\ mu_i(n )$ an d$\mu_{\alpha(i) }(n) $ was fou ndto  be  0 .0254 ,  while  th e m edian a bsolute dif fe r e n ce  was 0.0198. Furth er m o re , we com putedt he  a v erage $$ \b ar{ \ale p h }=\le ft(\ b eg in{matri x}
 \d i sp la ystyle 0.7217  & \ dis plays t yle0.5236   & \dis plays t yle 0.5908  &\ displaystyle0 .6 6 7 2\ \ 
 \d isp laystyle  0.68 1 5  &  \di s pl ays t yle 0 .6055  &  \ d isplaystyle 0.6138 &  \disp layst yle 0.5986\\ \displays t y l e   0.65 07 &  \ d isplaystyle 0. 7187 & \displa y style 0. 6035 & \disp laystyle0 . 5304\\
\di spl ays tyl e  0.4548  & \di s p lays ty le 0.64 20 & \dis pla yst yle  0. 67 58  & \di splaysty le  0 .7 21 3\\ 
   \ end{matr ix }\r ig ht) $$ of all 10 49 es tima te dm atr ices $\ a le p h (n)$ .To  ass ess  w hethe r or not  we can  interpre t $ \ bar{ \a le ph}$ as  having Prope rt y ($H2$),we  es timate d $\aleph( n)$, $\mu(n)$ and $t(n) $  again,  th is ti me i mposing t herestri cti o ns sti pulate d by($ H1$ ) and ( $ H 2$ ).In  this case w e o btain ed  the  follow ing average: $$\ba r {\b ar{\aleph}}=\ lef t(\b e g in {ma t ri x }
\d i spl a y style   0.7515& \display st y le    0.4807&  \d is playsty le   0. 5583&  \displ aystyle  0.6785\\ 
\dis p l ays tyle   0.6 942 & \d isplaysty l e   0 . 55 84 &\di splays ty le  0.6 141 &\ dis plays tyle  0 .5583\ \
 \d is playstyl e   0.6722 & \displayst yle  0.740 7 &  \display sty l e  0.5584 &  \
$ as_the initial_value. Furthermore, the optimization_process only_permits_the estimation_of_the probability of_a nucleotide of_type $j$ joining a_nucleotide of type_$i$_relative to the probability of a nucleotide of type $k$ joining a nucleotide of type $i$._In_order that_$\aleph(n)$_be_comparable in a meaningful way_between different numerical experiments, it_was scaled_after the optimization procedure to have the sum_of_all of its_elements equal to ten.

We found that the vectors $\mu(n)$_estimated for each matrix $P(n)$ generally_satisfy the property_($H1$)._The_mean absolute difference between_$\mu_i(n)$ and $\mu_{\alpha(i)}(n)$ was found to_be 0.0254, while the median absolute_difference was 0.0198. Furthermore, we computed the_average $$\bar{\aleph}=\left(\begin{matrix}
 \displaystyle   0.7217_ & \displaystyle 0.5236 _& \displaystyle_0.5908  & \displaystyle 0.6672\\
_\displaystyle  _0.6815 _& \displaystyle 0.6055_ & \displaystyle 0.6138  &_\displaystyle 0.5986\\
 \displaystyle_  0.6507  & \displaystyle_0.7187_ & \displaystyle_0.6035__& \displaystyle_0.5304\\
 \displaystyle __0.4548 _&_\displaystyle 0.6420  & \displaystyle 0.6758__& \displaystyle 0.7213\\
    \end{matrix}\right)$$_of all 1049 estimated_matrices_$\aleph(n)$. To assess whether_or not we can interpret_$\bar{\aleph}$ as having Property ($H2$), we_estimated $\aleph(n)$, $\mu(n)$_and $t(n)$_again, this time imposing the restrictions stipulated by ($H1$) and ($H2$)._In this case we obtained the_following average: $$\bar{\bar{\aleph}}=\left(\begin{matrix}
 \displaystyle_ _0.7515_& \displaystyle __0.4807 &_\displaystyle   0.5583 & \displaystyle _ 0.6785\\
_\displaystyle   0.6942 & \displaystyle_  0.5584 &_\displaystyle_  0.6141 & \displaystyle _ 0.5583\\
 \displaystyle   0.6722_& \displaystyle   0.7407_&_\displaystyle_  0.5584 & \