\leq T'$ is derived in the pure system of Def. \[mmb04\].

.5em For distinction, let us write $T\leq_1T'$ if we use the system including reflexivity and transitivity. We define the third relation $\leq_2$. First $\bigcup_{i\in I}S_i\leq_2\bigcup_{j\in J}S'_j$ if there is a mapping $I\mor fJ$ such that $S_i\leq_2S'_{f(i)}$ for every $i$. Second $\bigcap_{i\in I}R_i\leq_2\bigcap_{j\in J}R'_j$ if there is a mapping $J\mor fI$ such that $R_{f(j)}\leq_2R'_j$ for every $j$. Finally $R\leq_2R'$ if both $R$ and $R'$ are the same atomic type or $R=S\rightarrow T$ and $R'=S'\rightarrow T'$ with $S'\leq_2S$ and $T\leq_2T'$. Now it is easy to verify that $T\leq_1T'$ implies $T\leq_2T'$ by induction on the construction of the derivation trees. It is also easy to show that $T\leq_2T'$ implies $T\leq T'$. (As a consequence, all of $\leq,\leq_1$ and $\leq_2$ turn out to be the same.)

3ex

\[seh62\] We give the inference rules of typing judgements. A [*typing judgement*]{} has the form $\Gamma\;\vdash\;M\mathbin:T\;\mathbin|
 \;\Delta$. Here the typing environment $\Gamma$ is a finite sequence of $x_i\mathbin:S_i$, and the typing environment $\Delta$ is a finite sequence of $k_j\mathbin:T_j$. As usual, we assume that all variables in the typing environments are distinct from each other. We stress that only subsidiary types are assigned to ordinary variables while continuation variables have no limitation. We assume a special type $\dbot$ for typing jumps. The following are inference rules:

2ex 5em

2ex 5em

2ex 5em

2ex 5em

2ex 5em
\leq T'$ is derived in the pure system of Def.   \[mmb04\ ]. 

 .5em For distinction, lease us spell $ T\leq_1T'$ if we use the system including reflexivity and transitivity. We specify the third relation $ \leq_2$. First $ \bigcup_{i\in I}S_i\leq_2\bigcup_{j\in J}S'_j$ if there be a function $ I\mor fJ$ such that $ S_i\leq_2S'_{f(i)}$ for every $ i$. Second $ \bigcap_{i\in I}R_i\leq_2\bigcap_{j\in J}R'_j$ if there is a mapping $ J\mor fI$ such that $ R_{f(j)}\leq_2R'_j$ for every $ j$. Finally $ R\leq_2R'$ if both $ R$ and $ R'$ are the same atomic character or $ R = S\rightarrow T$ and $ R'=S'\rightarrow T'$ with $ S'\leq_2S$ and $ T\leq_2T'$. Now it is easy to verify that $ T\leq_1T'$ incriminate $ T\leq_2T'$ by induction on the structure of the derivation tree. It is besides easy to show that $ T\leq_2T'$ implies $ T\leq T'$. (As a consequence, all of $ \leq,\leq_1 $ and $ \leq_2 $ become out to be the same .) 

 3ex 

 \[seh62\ ] We give the inference rule of type judgements. A [ * type judgement * ] { } has the form $ \Gamma\;\vdash\;M\mathbin: T\;\mathbin| 
  \;\Delta$. Here the typing environment $ \Gamma$ is a finite succession of $ x_i\mathbin: S_i$, and the typing environment $ \Delta$ is a finite sequence of $ k_j\mathbin: T_j$. As usual, we assume that all variables in the typing environment are distinct from each other. We stress that only subsidiary types are assigned to ordinary variables while continuation variable have no limitation. We wear a special type $ \dbot$ for typing jumps. The follow are inference rules: 

 2ex 5em 

 2ex 5em 

 2ex 5em 

 2ex 5em 

 2ex 5em
\leq T'$ is derived in the purt system of Def. \[mmy04\].

.5wm For distihction, ldt us write $T\leq_1T'$ if we use vhe wysten including reflexivith and trajsitivitt. We eefine the third rcjatikk $\leq_2$. Hirst $\bigcup_{i\in I}S_i\leq_2\bigwup_{j\in J}S'_j$ if dhdrz is a mapping $I\mor fJ$ such that $S_i\lqq_2S'_{f(i)}$ fpr every $i$. Seconq $\bibsap_{i\jn I}R_i\leq_2\bigcap_{j\in J}R'_j$ if there is a mapppng $J\mor fI$ such yhat $R_{f(j)}\leq_2R'_j$ for every $j$. Vinaply $R\leq_2R'$ if both $G$ and $R'$ are the wame atomic gype or $R=S\gnghtarrow T$ and $R'=S'\rightarrow T'$ with $S'\leq_2S$ xnd $T\keq_2T'$. Now ij js gasy to verihy than $T\leq_1T'$ implicx $T\leq_2D'$ by incuction on the coistryction of the derivatmon trees. It is also easy to vhkw that $T\leq_2T'$ impoiws $T\lgq T'$. (Ds a xonreqheice, all ov $\lxq,\leq_1$ and $\lsq_2$ turn out to be the same.)

3ex

\[sen62\] Rv give the inrerencq wules of typing judgements. A [*typing judcemsnt*]{} has the form $\Gamma\;\veash\;M\mathbin:T\;\mathbin|
 \;\Felta$. Herq the typing environment $\Gamma$ is a finite sequenwe of $b_i\mcbmbin:R_u$, wnd the typing environment $\Delta$ is a finite fsqiekce of $k_j\mathbin:B_j$. As usual, we assimf yrat all variacles iu tge typing environmfnts arg distunct from eacn other. We stress that only subsidiary nypew are assigned to lrdinary vaxiablex whike continuation variablzs havs no limitahion. We aarume a special thpe $\dtot$ for uhping jumps. The fjllowing ere iuference rulgs:

2ex 5em

2qx 5em

2ex 5em

2fx 5em

2cf 5em
\leq T'$ is derived in the pure Def. .5em For let us write system reflexivity and transitivity. define the third $\leq_2$. First $\bigcup_{i\in I}S_i\leq_2\bigcup_{j\in J}S'_j$ if is a mapping $I\mor fJ$ such that $S_i\leq_2S'_{f(i)}$ for every $i$. Second $\bigcap_{i\in J}R'_j$ if there is a mapping $J\mor fI$ such that $R_{f(j)}\leq_2R'_j$ for every Finally if $R$ $R'$ are the same atomic type or $R=S\rightarrow T$ and $R'=S'\rightarrow T'$ with $S'\leq_2S$ and $T\leq_2T'$. it is easy to verify that $T\leq_1T'$ implies by induction on the of the derivation trees. It also to show $T\leq_2T'$ $T\leq (As a consequence, of $\leq,\leq_1$ and $\leq_2$ turn out to be the same.) 3ex \[seh62\] We give the inference rules typing judgements. judgement*]{} has form \;\Delta$. the typing environment a finite sequence of $x_i\mathbin:S_i$, and $\Delta$ is a finite sequence of $k_j\mathbin:T_j$. As we assume all variables in the typing environments distinct from each other. We stress that only types are assigned to ordinary variables while continuation variables have no limitation. We assume a $\dbot$ for typing jumps. following are inference 2ex 2ex 2ex 2ex 5em 5em
\leq T'$ is derived in the pure sysTem of Def. \[mmB04\].

.5em FoR diStiNcTion, Let uS write $T\leq_1T'$ if wE Use tHe system including refleXivitY aND traNSiTivitY. We defiNE tHE ThiRd ReLatIoN $\LeQ_2$. FirsT $\biGcup_{i\in i}S_i\leq_2\bigcUp_{j\In j}S'_j$ if there is A MaPping $I\mor fj$ suCh that $S_i\leq_2S'_{F(i)}$ fOr everY $i$. secONd $\bigCap_{I\in I}R_I\leq_2\biGCap_{j\in j}R'_j$ if therE iS A mappiNG $J\mor fI$ SUCh That $r_{f(j)}\leq_2R'_j$ for every $j$. fInALly $R\leq_2R'$ if both $r$ and $R'$ aRe THe SAMe aTomIc type or $R=S\RiGhtarROw T$ and $R'=s'\RiGHTArrOW T'$ with $S'\leq_2S$ anD $T\leq_2T'$. Now it IS eaSy to veRiFy tHAt $T\leq_1t'$ implIeS $t\leQ_2T'$ by inductiOn on The constrUction OF the derIVation tRees. It Is aLso Easy TO sHoW thAt $t\Leq_2t'$ ImPliES $T\lEq T'$. (As a coNsEqUence, All oF $\LEQ,\Leq_1$ aNd $\lEq_2$ tuRn out To be the same.)

3ex

\[Seh62\] we giVE thE infeRence RuleS oF typiNg judgEmentS. A [*Typing judgement*]{} Has tHe form $\GamMa\;\vDaSh\;M\MaThbin:t\;\MathbiN|
 \;\DeLta$. here the Typing eNVirOnMENT $\GAmma$ is a finite sequeNcE OF $x_I\mathbin:s_i$, and tHE tYpINg enviroNmEnt $\deltA$ IS a finIte sEQuEnce of $k_j\MathbiN:t_j$. as Usual, we AsSume thAt All VarIableS In thE typinG environMents ARe distinct from EAch other. We strESs THAt ONly sUbsIdiary types Are aSSignEd to ORdInaRY variAbles WhILe COntinuation variableS hAve no lImitaTion. We assume a Special typE $\DBOt$ for typIng jUMpS. the following arE infeRence rules:

2EX 5em

2ex 5em

2eX 5em

2ex 5Em

2ex 5em
\leq T'$ is derived in the  pure syst em of  De f.\[ mmb0 4\]. 

.5em For dis t inct ion, let us write $T\l eq_1T '$ if w e  u se th e syste m  i n c lud in gref le x iv ity a ndtransit ivity. Wedef in e the thirdr el ation $\le q_2 $. First $\b igc up_{i\ in  I} S _i\le q_2 \bigc up_{j\ i n J}S' _j$ if th er e  is am apping$ I \m or f J$ such that $S_i \ le q _2S'_{f(i)}$ f or eve ry $i $ .  Se con d $\bigcap _{ i\inI }R_i\le q _2 \ b i gca p _{j\in J}R'_j $ if therei s a  mappi ng  $J \ mor fI $ suc ht hat  $R_{f(j)}\ leq_ 2R'_j$ fo r ever y  $j$. F i nally $ R\leq_ 2R' $ i f bo t h$R $ a nd $R' $  a ret hesame ato mi ctypeor $ R = S \ righ tar rowT$ an d $R'=S'\righ tar rowT '$with$S'\l eq_2 S$  and$T\leq _2T'$ .Now it is easyto v erify tha t $ T\ leq _1 T'$ i m plies$T\ leq _2T'$ b y induc t ion  o n t he  construction of t he d er ivationtrees. It  i s  also ea sy  to  sho w that$T\l e q_ 2T'$ imp lies $ T \l eq  T'$. ( As  a con se que nce , all of $ \leq,\ leq_1$ a nd $\ l eq_2$ turn out to be the sam e .) 3e x 

\[ seh 62\] We giv e th e  inf eren c erul e s oftypin gj ud g ements. A [*typingju dgemen t*]{}  has the form  $\Gamma\; \ v d ash\;M\m athb i n: T \;\mathbin|
 \ ;\Del ta$. Heret he typin g env ironment  $\Gamma$ i s a fini teseq uen ceo f  $ x_i\mathbin:S _ i $, a nd  the ty pin g envir onm ent  $\ Del ta $ is a fi nite seq ue nc eof  $k _j\ma t hbin:T_j $.  As  u sua l, we assume  that  all  v ar i abl es in t h et y ping  e nv iron men ts  aredist i nct  from e ach other . W e  str es sthat on ly subsidiary  t ypes are a ss ign ed too r dinary v ariables while continua t ion var iab les h aveno limita tio n. Weass u me a s pecial  type  $ \db o t $ for t yp ing  j umps. Thef o llo wingar e in ference  rules:

2ex 5em
2 ex5em

2ex 5em
2e x 5e m 
2 ex5 em 
\leq T'$_is derived_in the pure system_of Def. \[mmb04\].

.5em_For_distinction, let_us_write $T\leq_1T'$ if_we use the_system including reflexivity and_transitivity. We define_the_third relation $\leq_2$. First $\bigcup_{i\in I}S_i\leq_2\bigcup_{j\in J}S'_j$ if there is a mapping $I\mor fJ$_such_that $S_i\leq_2S'_{f(i)}$_for_every_$i$. Second $\bigcap_{i\in I}R_i\leq_2\bigcap_{j\in J}R'_j$_if there is a mapping_$J\mor fI$_such that $R_{f(j)}\leq_2R'_j$ for every $j$. Finally $R\leq_2R'$_if_both $R$ and_$R'$ are the same atomic type or $R=S\rightarrow T$_and $R'=S'\rightarrow T'$ with $S'\leq_2S$ and_$T\leq_2T'$. Now it_is_easy_to verify that $T\leq_1T'$_implies $T\leq_2T'$ by induction on the_construction of the derivation trees. It_is also easy to show that $T\leq_2T'$_implies $T\leq T'$. (As a consequence,_all of $\leq,\leq_1$ and $\leq_2$_turn out_to be the same.)

3ex

\[seh62\] We_give the inference_rules of_typing judgements. A_[*typing judgement*]{} has the form $\Gamma\;\vdash\;M\mathbin:T\;\mathbin|
_\;\Delta$. Here the_typing environment $\Gamma$ is a finite_sequence_of $x_i\mathbin:S_i$, and_the_typing_environment $\Delta$_is a finite_sequence_of $k_j\mathbin:T_j$._As_usual, we assume that all variables_in_the typing environments are distinct from each_other. We stress that_only_subsidiary types are assigned_to ordinary variables while continuation_variables have no limitation. We assume_a special_type $\dbot$_for typing jumps. The following are inference rules:

2ex 5em

2ex 5em

2ex 5em

2ex_5em

2ex 5em