beta^{(h)} \cdot {\tilde {\bar \beta}}^{(h)} \Big],\nonumber\\
&&\nonumber\\
{\cal L}_{b} \longrightarrow \tilde {\cal L}_{b} & = & \tilde {\cal L}_0 + \frac {\partial} 
{\partial \bar \theta}\, \frac {\partial} {\partial  \theta}\,  \Big [ \frac {i} {2} \, \tilde {\cal A}_\mu^{(h)} 
\cdot \tilde {\cal A}^{\mu (h)} + \tilde {\cal F}^{(h)} \cdot {\tilde {\bar {\cal F}}}^{(h)} 
+ \frac {i}{2} \, \tilde \Phi_\mu^{(h)} \cdot \tilde \Phi^{\mu (h)} 
+ \frac{1}{2}\, \tilde  \beta^{(h)} \cdot {\tilde {\bar \beta}}^{(h)}  \Big].\nonumber\\\end{aligned}$$ Now, the (anti-)BRST invariance of the above coupled Lagrangian densities is straightforward because of the fact $(\partial_\theta^2 = \partial_{\bar \theta}^2 = 0)$. Thus, we have $$\begin{aligned}
\frac {\partial}{\partial \theta}\;  \tilde{\cal L}_{\bar b}\bigg|_{\bar \theta = 0}  = 0,\qquad
\frac {\partial}{\partial \bar \theta}\;  \tilde{\cal L}_b \bigg|_{\theta = 0} = 0,\end{aligned}$$ which imply the (anti-)BRST invariance of the coupled Lagrangian densities within the framework of superfield formalism.

[99]{} Schwinger, J. S.: Phys. Rev. [**125**]{}, 397 (1962)

Schwinger, J. S.: Phys. Rev. [**128**]{}, 2425 (1962)

Deser, S., Jackiw, R., Templeton, S.: Ann. Phys. [**140**]{}, 372 (1982) \[Erratum-ibid. [**185**]{}, 406 (1988)\]

Deser, S., Jackiw, R., Templeton, S.: Phys. Rev. Lett. [**48**]{}, 975 (1982)

Freedman, D. Z., Townsend, P. K.: Nucl. Phys. B [**177**]{}, 282 (1981)

Allen, T. J., Bowick, M. J., Lahiri, A.: Mod.
beta^{(h) } \cdot { \tilde { \bar \beta}}^{(h) } \Big],\nonumber\\ 
 & & \nonumber\\ 
 { \cal L}_{b } \longrightarrow \tilde { \cal L}_{b } & = & \tilde { \cal L}_0 + \frac { \partial } 
 { \partial \bar \theta}\, \frac { \partial } { \partial   \theta}\,   \Big [ \frac { i } { 2 } \, \tilde { \cal A}_\mu^{(h) } 
 \cdot \tilde { \cal A}^{\mu (h) } + \tilde { \cal F}^{(h) } \cdot { \tilde { \bar { \cal F}}}^{(h) } 
 + \frac { i}{2 } \, \tilde \Phi_\mu^{(h) } \cdot \tilde \Phi^{\mu (h) } 
 + \frac{1}{2}\, \tilde   \beta^{(h) } \cdot { \tilde { \bar \beta}}^{(h) }   \Big].\nonumber\\\end{aligned}$$ Now, the (anti-)BRST invariability of the above pair Lagrangian densities is straightforward because of the fact $ (\partial_\theta^2 = \partial_{\bar \theta}^2 = 0)$. therefore, we have $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 \frac { \partial}{\partial \theta}\;   \tilde{\cal L}_{\bar b}\bigg|_{\bar \theta = 0 }   = 0,\qquad 
 \frac { \partial}{\partial \bar \theta}\;   \tilde{\cal L}_b \bigg|_{\theta = 0 } = 0,\end{aligned}$$ which incriminate the (anti-)BRST invariance of the coupled Lagrangian density within the framework of superfield formalism. 

 [ 99 ] { } Schwinger, J. S.: Phys. Rev. [ * * 125 * * ] { }, 397 (1962) 

 Schwinger, J. S.: Phys. Rev. [ * * 128 * * ] { }, 2425 (1962) 

 Deser, S., Jackiw, R., Templeton, S.: Ann. Phys. [ * * 140 * * ] { }, 372 (1982) \[Erratum - ibid. [ * * 185 * * ] { }, 406 (1988)\ ] 

 Deser, S., Jackiw, R., Templeton, S.: Phys. Rev. Lett. [ * * 48 * * ] { }, 975 (1982) 

 Freedman, D. Z., Townsend, P. K.: Nucl. Phys. B [ * * 177 * * ] { }, 282 (1981) 

 Allen, T. J., Bowick, M. J., Lahiri, A.: Mod.
betw^{(h)} \cdot {\tilde {\bar \beta}}^{(h)} \Nig],\nonumber\\
&&\nonumywr\\
{\cal N}_{b} \lonfrightarfow \tilde {\cal L}_{b} & = & \tilde {\cap O}_0 + \frqc {\partial} 
{\partial \bar \theta}\, \frwc {\partiql} {\pertial  \theta}\,  \Bmf [ \frac {i} {2} \, \tjpde {\eao A}_\mu^{(h)} 
\cdot \tikde {\cal A}^{\mg (h)} + \tilde {\cal F}^{(f)} \edot {\tilde {\bar {\cal F}}}^{(h)} 
+ \frac {i}{2} \, \tilde \Phi_\mu^{(h)} \cfot \tilde \Phi^{\mo (h)} 
+ \gwac{1}{2}\, \fplbe  \beta^{(h)} \cdot {\tilde {\bar \beta}}^{(h)}  \Big].\nonlmber\\\end{aligned}$$ Npw, the (anti-)BRST invariance of hhe above coupled Pagrangian eensyries is strakghtforward because of the fact $(\partial_\theta^2 = \partial_{\car \tketa}^2 = 0)$. Thus, ww hwee $$\begin{alijned}
\frwc {\partial}{\pavnial \thata}\;  \tikde{\cal L}_{\bar b}\blgg|_{\bac \thwta = 0}  = 0,\qquad
\frac {\parvial}{\partial \bar \thetw}\;  \tilde{\cdl L}_b \bigg|_{\theta = 0} = 0,\wne{aligted}$$ fhicf imoly tie (znti-)BRDT mnvariance kf the coupoed Lagrangian densotyvx within the framerowk of superfield formalism.

[99]{} Schwinger, J. V.: Pgys. Rev. [**125**]{}, 397 (1962)

Schwinger, J. S.: Phys. Rev. [**128**]{}, 2425 (1962)

Deser, S., Jwckiw, R., Tqmpleton, S.: Ann. Phys. [**140**]{}, 372 (1982) \[Erratum-ibid. [**185**]{}, 406 (1988)\]

Deser, S., Jackhw, R., Veoplttin, S.: Oyyd. Rev. Lett. [**48**]{}, 975 (1982)

Freedman, D. Z., Townsend, P. K.: Nucl. Prgs. B [**177**]{}, 282 (1981)

Allen, T. J., Bjwick, M. J., Lshlro, A.: Mod.
beta^{(h)} \cdot {\tilde {\bar \beta}}^{(h)} \Big],\nonumber\\ &&\nonumber\\ \longrightarrow {\cal L}_{b} = & \tilde {\partial \theta}\, \frac {\partial} \theta}\, \Big [ {i} {2} \, \tilde {\cal A}_\mu^{(h)} \tilde {\cal A}^{\mu (h)} + \tilde {\cal F}^{(h)} \cdot {\tilde {\bar {\cal F}}}^{(h)} \frac {i}{2} \, \tilde \Phi_\mu^{(h)} \cdot \tilde \Phi^{\mu (h)} + \frac{1}{2}\, \tilde \beta^{(h)} {\tilde \beta}}^{(h)} Now, (anti-)BRST invariance of the above coupled Lagrangian densities is straightforward because of the fact $(\partial_\theta^2 = \theta}^2 = 0)$. Thus, we have $$\begin{aligned} \frac \theta}\; \tilde{\cal L}_{\bar b}\bigg|_{\bar = 0} = 0,\qquad \frac \bar \tilde{\cal L}_b = = which imply the invariance of the coupled Lagrangian densities within the framework of superfield formalism. [99]{} Schwinger, J. S.: Phys. [**125**]{}, 397 J. S.: Rev. 2425 Deser, S., Jackiw, S.: Ann. Phys. [**140**]{}, 372 (1982) (1988)\] Deser, S., Jackiw, R., Templeton, S.: Phys. Lett. [**48**]{}, (1982) Freedman, D. Z., Townsend, P. Nucl. Phys. B [**177**]{}, 282 (1981) Allen, T. Bowick, M. J., Lahiri, A.: Mod.
beta^{(h)} \cdot {\tilde {\bar \beta}}^{(h)} \Big],\Nonumber\\
&&\noNumbeR\\
{\caL L}_{b} \LoNgriGhtaRrow \tilde {\cal L}_{b} & = & \TIlde {\Cal L}_0 + \frac {\partial} 
{\partial \Bar \thEtA}\, \Frac {\PArTial} {\pArtial  \tHEtA}\,  \bIg [ \fRaC {i} {2} \, \TilDe {\CAl a}_\mu^{(h)} 
\cDot \Tilde {\caL A}^{\mu (h)} + \tilde {\Cal f}^{(h)} \Cdot {\tilde {\bar {\CAl f}}}^{(h)} 
+ \frac {i}{2} \, \tilDe \PHi_\mu^{(h)} \cdot \tilDe \PHi^{\mu (h)} 
+ \fRaC{1}{2}\, \tiLDe  \betA^{(h)} \cDot {\tiLde {\bar \BEta}}^{(h)}  \BiG].\nonumber\\\EnD{AligneD}$$ now, the (aNTI-)BrST iNvariance of the aboVE cOUpled LagrangiaN densiTiES iS STraIghTforward beCaUse of THe fact $(\pARtIAL_\TheTA^2 = \partial_{\bar \thEta}^2 = 0)$. Thus, we haVE $$\beGin{aliGnEd}
\fRAc {\partIal}{\paRtIAl \tHeta}\;  \tilde{\caL L}_{\baR b}\bigg|_{\bar \Theta = 0}  = 0,\qQUad
\frac {\PArtial}{\pArtial \Bar \TheTa}\;  \tiLDe{\CaL L}_b \BiGG|_{\thETa = 0} = 0,\End{ALigNed}$$ which ImPlY the (aNti-)Brst INvarIanCe of The coUpled LagrangiAn dEnsiTIes WithiN the fRameWoRk of sUperfiEld foRmAlism.

[99]{} Schwinger, J. s.: PhyS. Rev. [**125**]{}, 397 (1962)

SchwiNgeR, J. s.: PhYs. rev. [**128**]{}, 2425 (1962)

DeSEr, S., JacKiw, r., TeMpleton, s.: Ann. PhyS. [**140**]{}, 372 (1982) \[errAtUM-IBiD. [**185**]{}, 406 (1988)\]

Deser, S., Jackiw, R., TempLeTON, S.: phys. Rev. LEtt. [**48**]{}, 975 (1982)

FreEDmAn, d. z., TownsenD, P. k.: NuCl. PhYS. b [**177**]{}, 282 (1981)

AlleN, T. J., BOWiCk, M. J., LahiRi, A.: Mod.
beta^{(h)} \cdot {\tilde { \bar \beta }}^{( h)}  \B ig ],\n onum ber\\
&&\nonum b er\\ 
{\cal L}_{b} \longrig htarr ow \til d e{\cal  L}_{b} &= & \ ti ld e { \c a lL}_0+ \ frac {\ partial} {\p ar tial \bar \t h et a}\, \frac  {\ partial} {\p art ial  \ th eta } \,  \ Big  [ \f rac {i }  {2} \ , \tilde{\ c al A}_ \ mu^{(h) } 
\ cdot  \tilde {\cal A}^ { \m u  (h)} + \tilde  {\cal  F } ^{ ( h )}\cd ot {\tilde  { \bar{ \cal F} } }^ { ( h )}+ \frac {i}{2 } \, \tilde \Ph i_\mu^ {( h)} \cdot\tild e\ Phi ^{\mu (h)}
+ \ frac{1}{2 }\, \t i lde  \b e ta^{(h) } \cdo t { \ti lde{ \b ar  \b et a }}^ { (h )}\Bi g].\nonu mb er \\\en d{al i g n e d}$$  No w, t he (a nti-)BRST inv ari ance ofthe a bovecoup le d Lag rangia n den si ties is straigh tfor ward beca use  o f t he  fact $(\par tia l_\ theta^2  = \par t ial _{ \ b a r\theta}^2 = 0)$. T hu s ,  w e have $ $\begi n {a li g ned}
\fr ac  {\ part i a l}{\p arti a l\theta}\ ;  \ti l de {\ cal L}_ {\ bar b} \b igg |_{ \bar\ thet a = 0}   = 0,\q quad\ frac {\partial } {\partial \ba r  \ t h et a }\; \t ilde{\cal L }_b\ bigg |_{\ t he ta=  0} =  0,\e nd { al i gned}$$ which imply  t he (an ti-)B RST invarianc e of the c o u p led Lagr angi a nd ensities withi n the  framework of super field  formali sm.

[99] { }  Schwing er,  J.  S. : P h y s.  Rev. [**125* * ] {},39 7 (1962 )
Schwing er,  J.  S. : P hy s. Rev. [ **128**] {} ,24 25  (1 962)Deser, S .,  Ja ck iw,  R.,T emplet on, S .: A nn .P hys . [**14 0 ** ] { }, 3 72  ( 1982 ) \ [E rratu m-ib i d.[**185* *]{}, 406  (1 9 88)\ ]
D eser, S ., Jackiw, R. ,Templeton,  S .:Phys.R e v. Lett.  [**48**]{}, 975 (1982) 
Freedm an,  D. Z ., T ownsend,P.K.: Nu cl. Phys.B [**1 77**] {} , 2 8 2  (198 1 ) 
All en , T. J., B o w ick , M.J. , La hiri, A .: Mod.
beta^{(h)} \cdot_{\tilde {\bar_\beta}}^{(h)} \Big],\nonumber\\
&&\nonumber\\
{\cal L}_{b} \longrightarrow_\tilde {\cal_L}_{b}_& =_&_\tilde {\cal L}_0_+ \frac {\partial}_
{\partial \bar \theta}\, \frac_{\partial} {\partial _\theta}\,_ \Big [ \frac {i} {2} \, \tilde {\cal A}_\mu^{(h)} 
\cdot \tilde {\cal A}^{\mu_(h)}_+ \tilde_{\cal_F}^{(h)}_\cdot {\tilde {\bar {\cal F}}}^{(h)}_
+ \frac {i}{2} \, \tilde_\Phi_\mu^{(h)} \cdot_\tilde \Phi^{\mu (h)} 
+ \frac{1}{2}\, \tilde  \beta^{(h)}_\cdot_{\tilde {\bar \beta}}^{(h)}_ \Big].\nonumber\\\end{aligned}$$ Now, the (anti-)BRST invariance of the above_coupled Lagrangian densities is straightforward because_of the fact_$(\partial_\theta^2_=_\partial_{\bar \theta}^2 = 0)$._Thus, we have $$\begin{aligned}
\frac {\partial}{\partial \theta}\;_ \tilde{\cal L}_{\bar b}\bigg|_{\bar \theta =_0}  = 0,\qquad
\frac {\partial}{\partial \bar \theta}\;_ \tilde{\cal L}_b \bigg|_{\theta = 0}_= 0,\end{aligned}$$ which imply the_(anti-)BRST invariance_of the coupled Lagrangian densities_within the framework_of superfield_formalism.

[99]{} Schwinger, J._S.: Phys. Rev. [**125**]{}, 397 (1962)

Schwinger,_J. S.: Phys._Rev. [**128**]{}, 2425 (1962)

Deser, S., Jackiw,_R.,_Templeton, S.: Ann._Phys._[**140**]{},_372 (1982)_\[Erratum-ibid. [**185**]{}, 406_(1988)\]

Deser,_S., Jackiw,_R.,_Templeton, S.: Phys. Rev. Lett. [**48**]{},_975_(1982)

Freedman, D. Z., Townsend, P. K.: Nucl._Phys. B [**177**]{}, 282_(1981)

Allen,_T. J., Bowick, M._J., Lahiri, A.: Mod.