.]{} An example can be seen in the analysis made by @padwhite2008 in Fourier space and @xu2013 in configuration space. The latter recognize the need of introducing a two-step transformation, one isotropic dilation and one warping transformation, to transform from real fiducial to real space. However, the real fiducial space is actually redshift-space, and this identification is missing in these works.

Therefore, we argue (c.f., Section \[sec:sec2\]) that it is convenient to define the observable-redshift-space ${\bm \sigma}$ (${\sigma}$-space) given by the simple redshift differences and subtended angles that are truly observable, and that do not depend on any choice of cosmological parameters. Multiplying by a units function (scale factor) produces the physical redshift-space ($s-$space): ${\bm s} = K({\bm \Omega},z) ~ {\bm \sigma}$, that is isomorphic to the observable ${ \sigma}$-space, but has actual distance units that are dependent on a particular cosmological set of parameters [$\Omega$]{} and the redshift $z$. The $K({\bm \Omega},z)$ function is chosen so that the physical redshift-space is related to real space ${\bm r}$ by a unitary Jacobian independent of redshift. So that no additional scaling is needed, and the only remaining difference will be precisely in shape. That is why ${\bm \sigma}$ and ${\bm s}$ are more alike, and thus can both be named redshift-space; ${\bm \sigma}$ is the observable redshift-space while ${\bm s}$ is the physical redshift-space. Then, the transformation to real-space necessarily goes through redshift distortions.

Furthermore, when we introduce peculiar non-relativistic velocities in this scheme, we will show that it is possible to keep the same relation between observable and physical redshift-spaces, ${\bm s}$ and ${\bm \sigma}$, and that the @kaiser87 effect is recovered independently of redshift (see Section \[sec:sec3\]). That is, now redshift-space will also show an additional gravitational distortion with respect to real-space.

To solve for the relation between real-space and redshift-space, we will rely on projected correlations. Projections of the 2PCF in the plane of the sky have been widely used to avoid the complications of dealing with unknown components in redshift-space [e.g., @davis_peebles_83]. This has the advantage that
. ] { } An example can be seen in the analysis made by @padwhite2008 in Fourier quad and @xu2013 in shape space. The latter recognize the motivation of introduce a two - step transformation, one isotropic dilation and one warping transformation, to translate from real fiducial to real space. However, the actual fiducial space is actually red shift - space, and this identification is missing in these works. 

 consequently, we argue (c.f. , Section   \[sec: sec2\ ]) that it is convenient to define the discernible - redshift - quad $ { \bm \sigma}$ ($ { \sigma}$-space) contribute by the simple redshift differences and subtend angles that are truly discernible, and that do not depend on any option of cosmological parameters. Multiplying by a units function (scale agent) produces the physical redshift - space ($ s-$space ): $ { \bm s } = K({\bm \Omega},z) ~ { \bm \sigma}$, that is isomorphic to the observable $ { \sigma}$-space, but has actual distance units that are dependent on a particular cosmological set of parameters [ $ \Omega$ ] { } and the redshift $ z$. The $ K({\bm \Omega},z)$ function is chosen so that the physical red shift - outer space is related to veridical space $ { \bm r}$ by a unitary Jacobian independent of redshift. therefore that no additional scaling is needed, and the only remaining remainder will be precisely in shape. That is why $ { \bm \sigma}$ and $ { \bm s}$ are more alike, and thus can both be named redshift - space; $ { \bm \sigma}$ is the observable red shift - space while $ { \bm s}$ is the physical redshift - space. Then, the transformation to real - space necessarily run low through redshift distortions. 

 Furthermore, when we introduce peculiar non - relativistic velocities in this schema, we will show that it is possible to keep the like relation between discernible and physical redshift - spaces, $ { \bm s}$ and $ { \bm \sigma}$, and that the @kaiser87 effect is recovered independently of red shift (see Section   \[sec: sec3\ ]). That is, now redshift - space will also prove an additional gravitational distorted shape with respect to veridical - space. 

 To solve for the relation back between actual - space and red shift - space, we will rely on projected correlations. projection of the 2PCF in the airplane of the sky have been widely used to debar the complications of dealing with unknown components in redshift - space [ e.g., @davis_peebles_83 ]. This have the advantage that
.]{} An example can be seen in uhe analysis made by @padxhite2008 ih Fourief space and @xu2013 in configuratmon wpace. The latter recognize ghe need lf introeuciig a two-step traiaformatljn, ohc isocripic dilation snd one wasping transforkagiln, to transform from real fiducial eo real soace. However, tre rtal fidhbicl space is actually redshift-spzce, and this identifocation is missing in thesf wogks.

Therefore, we arhue (c.f., Sectuon \[sqx:sec2\]) that it is convenpznt to defihe the observable-redshift-space ${\cm \siyma}$ (${\sigma}$-spqcw) gleen by the wimplv redshift dingerencas and xubtended anglcs thet aee truly observable, aid that do not depenq on any whkice of cosmologixao pardmetars. Oyltkplgiig gy a ujita function (scale factir) produces the phyxisql redshift-spzce ($s-$s[ase): ${\bm s} = K({\bm \Omega},z) ~ {\bm \sigma}$, that is ivomkrphic to the observablw ${ \sigma}$-space, but has actual dystance units that are dependent on a particular wosmomugieql seg ov parameters [$\Omega$]{} and the redshift $z$. The $K({\bm \Kmtga},d)$ function is chofen so that tje khysical redshkft-spaes js related to real space ${\fm r}$ vy a unitwry Kacobian independent of redwhift. So than no additional scaliny is needed, cnd thg only remaining difference wnll be precisely ln shape. Ffat is why ${\bm \siema}$ atd ${\bm s}$ are more alike, and thus can botk be namdd rgdshift-fpace; ${\bm \slgma}$ lv the observable rfdshiyt-spawe while ${\bl s}$ is the physical redshift-sparx. Then, the trsnvfogmation tj reak-space necesswrily goes thrpugh rebshift distortiohs.

Furthxrmore, when re introduce [gculiar non-renativistyc vwlocuties iv this scheme, wr will show that it is possible to kecp thg aame relation bzuwetn observable anc pfysycwl rqgshift-spaces, ${\bm r}$ avc ${\bm \rigma}$, and tmat the @kaiser87 effect is rewoveded independently pf redshifj (see Seceion \[sec:sec3\]). Thst is, now redshift-dpace wiul alxo fhow an additional gravitationzl distorhiok with respece to real-space.

To solve for the relation between real-spare and redshift-space, wg will rely on projecjed correlatiois. Protections mf the 2PCF in the plqne of the sky haye been widely used to avoid the fomplications of dealing with unknown components in redshift-space [e.g., @daviw_peeblxs_83]. This has tge acvantdgz tkat
.]{} An example can be seen in made @padwhite2008 in space and @xu2013 recognize need of introducing two-step transformation, one dilation and one warping transformation, to from real fiducial to real space. However, the real fiducial space is actually and this identification is missing in these works. Therefore, we argue (c.f., Section that is to the observable-redshift-space ${\bm \sigma}$ (${\sigma}$-space) given by the simple redshift differences and subtended angles that are observable, and that do not depend on any of cosmological parameters. Multiplying a units function (scale factor) the redshift-space ($s-$space): s} K({\bm ~ {\bm \sigma}$, is isomorphic to the observable ${ \sigma}$-space, but has actual distance units that are dependent on a cosmological set [$\Omega$]{} and redshift The \Omega},z)$ function is that the physical redshift-space is related ${\bm r}$ by a unitary Jacobian independent of So that additional scaling is needed, and the remaining difference will be precisely in shape. That why ${\bm \sigma}$ and ${\bm s}$ are more alike, and thus can both be named \sigma}$ is the observable while ${\bm s}$ the redshift-space. the to real-space goes through redshift distortions. Furthermore, when we introduce peculiar non-relativistic velocities this scheme, we will show that it is possible to same between observable and redshift-spaces, ${\bm s}$ and \sigma}$, that the @kaiser87 effect independently redshift That now will also show an gravitational distortion with respect to To solve for the we will rely on projected correlations. Projections of 2PCF in the plane of the sky been widely used to avoid the complications of dealing with unknown components redshift-space [e.g., has the advantage that
.]{} An example can be seen in the anAlysis made By @padWhiTe2008 iN FOuriEr spAce and @xu2013 in confIGuraTion space. The latter recoGnize ThE Need OF iNtrodUcing a tWO-sTEP trAnSfOrmAtIOn, One isOtrOpic dilAtion and onE waRpIng transformATiOn, to transfOrm From real fiduCiaL to reaL sPacE. howevEr, tHe reaL fiducIAl spacE is actualLy REdshifT-Space, anD THiS ideNtification is missINg IN these works.

TheRefore, We ARgUE (C.f., SEctIon \[sec:sec2\]) tHaT it is COnvenieNT tO DEFinE The observable-Redshift-spaCE ${\bm \Sigma}$ (${\sIgMa}$-sPAce) givEn by tHe SImpLe redshift dIffeRences and SubtenDEd angleS That are Truly oBseRvaBle, aND tHaT do NoT DepENd On aNY chOice of coSmOlOgicaL parAMETErs. MUltIplyIng by A units functioN (scAle fACtoR) prodUces tHe phYsIcal rEdshifT-spacE ($s-$Space): ${\bm s} = K({\bm \OmegA},z) ~ {\bm \Sigma}$, that Is iSoMorPhIc to tHE obserVabLe ${ \sIgma}$-spaCe, but haS ActUaL DIStAnce units that are dePeNDEnT on a partIcular COsMoLOgical seT oF paRameTERs [$\OmeGa$]{} anD ThE redshifT $z$. The $K({\BM \OMeGa},z)$ funcTiOn is chOsEn sO thAt the PHysiCal redShift-spaCe is rELated to real spaCE ${\bm r}$ by a unitarY jaCOBiAN indEpeNdent of redsHift. sO thaT no aDDiTioNAl scaLing iS nEEdED, and the only remaininG dIffereNce wiLl be precisely In shape. ThaT IS Why ${\bm \sigMa}$ anD ${\Bm S}$ Are more alike, anD thus Can both be nAMed redshIft-spAce; ${\bm \sigMa}$ is the obSERvable reDshIft-SpaCe wHILe ${\Bm s}$ is the physiCAL redShIft-spacE. ThEn, the trAnsForMatIon To Real-space NecessarIlY gOeS tHroUgh reDShift disToRtiOnS.

FuRtherMOre, wheN we inTrodUcE pECulIar non-rELaTIVistIc VeLociTieS iN this ScheME, we Will shoW that it is PosSIble To KeEp the saMe relation betWeEn observabLe And PhysicAL Redshift-Spaces, ${\bm s}$ and ${\bm \sigma}$, and tHAt the @kaIseR87 effeCt is Recovered IndEpendeNtlY Of redsHift (seE SectIoN \[seC:SEc3\]). ThaT IS, nOw rEdShift-space WILl aLso shOw An adDitionaL gravitational distORtiOn with respect To rEal-sPACe.

to sOLvE For ThE RelATIon between real-sPace and redShIFt-Space, we wilL RelY oN projecTed corrElatiONs. ProjeCtions of tHe 2PCF in thE pLane OF The Sky have beeN widely uSed to avoiD The coMPlIcatiOns Of dealInG wiTh unkNown coMPonEnts iN redshIfT-space [E.g., @davIs_Peebles_83]. THis has the advantage that
.]{} An example can be see n in the a nalys ismad eby @ padw hite2008 in Fo u rier  space and @xu2013 inconfi gu r atio n  s pace.  The la t te r rec og ni zeth e  n eed o f i ntroduc ing a two- ste ptransformati o n,  one isotr opi c dilation a ndone wa rp ing trans for matio n, tot ransfo rm from r ea l  fiduc i al to r e a lspac e. However, the r e al fiducial space  is ac tu a ll y red shi ft-space,an d thi s  identi f ic a t i oni s missing inthese works . 

T herefo re , w e  argue  (c.f ., Sec tion \[sec: sec2 \]) thatit isc onvenie n t to de fine t heobs erva b le -r eds hi f t-s p ac e $ { \bm  \sigma} $($ {\sig ma}$ - s p a ce)giv en b y the  simple redsh ift  dif f ere ncesand s ubte nd ed an gles t hat a re  truly observab le,and thatdono t d ep end o n  any c hoi ceof cosm ologica l  pa ra m e t er s. Multiplying byau n it s functi on (sc a le  f a ctor) pr od uce s th e physi calr ed shift-sp ace ($ s -$ sp ace): $ {\ bm s}=K({ \bm  \Ome g a},z ) ~ {\ bm \sigm a}$,t hat is isomorp h ic to the obs e rv a b le ${ \ sig ma}$-space,  but hasactu a ldis t anceunits  t h at are dependent on apa rticul ar co smological se t of param e t e rs [$\Om ega$ ] {} and the redshi ft $z $. The $K( { \bm \Ome ga},z )$ funct ion is ch o s en so th atthe  ph ysi c a lredshift-spac e is r el ated to  re al spac e $ {\b m r }$by  a unitar y Jacobi an  i nd ep end ent o f  redshif t.  So  t hat  no a d dition al sc alin gis nee ded, an d  t h e  onl yre main ing  d iffer ence wil l be pr ecisely i n s h ape.  T ha t is wh y ${\bm \sigm a} $ and ${\b ms}$  are m o r e alike,  and thus can both be n a med red shi ft-sp ace;  ${\bm \s igm a}$ is  th e  obser vableredsh if t-s p a ce wh i l e${\ bm  s}$ is th e phy sical  r edsh ift-spa ce. Then, the tran s for mation to rea l-s pace n ec ess a ri l y g oe s  th r o ugh redshift di stortions. 
F ur thermore,w hen  w e intro duce pe culia r  non-re lativisti c velocit ie s in t his  scheme, w e will s how thati t isp os sible  to  keepth e s ame r elatio n  be tween  obser va ble an d phy si cal reds hift-spaces, ${\bm s}$and ${ \bm \ sig ma}$, and  th a t t he @kaise r87effect isrec ove red i nde p enden tlyo fred s hift(see Section \ [ se c:s e c 3\ ]). That is , n owredsh ift - spacewill  also show an add i tional gravita tion a l  di sto r tion  w ith respect to  re al - s pace.

T osolve for t he relat io n  betw een re al-spa ce andr e ds h ift-sp ace,  we  will rel y o np rojecte dco r relati ons.  P roject ions o f  the 2 PCF in the plane  of t h e  skyh ave  been  w idely u s ed t o avoid th e complicat ions o f de aling  with u nk nown c omp on ents in re d shift-spa ce [e .g., @d av is_p eeb les_83 ]. T h i s has  the  a dva ntage tha t 
.]{} An_example can_be seen in the_analysis made_by_@padwhite2008 in_Fourier_space and @xu2013_in configuration space._The latter recognize the_need of introducing_a_two-step transformation, one isotropic dilation and one warping transformation, to transform from real fiducial_to_real space._However,_the_real fiducial space is actually_redshift-space, and this identification is_missing in_these works.

Therefore, we argue (c.f., Section \[sec:sec2\]) that it_is_convenient to define_the observable-redshift-space ${\bm \sigma}$ (${\sigma}$-space) given by the simple_redshift differences and subtended angles that_are truly observable,_and_that_do not depend on_any choice of cosmological parameters. Multiplying_by a units function (scale factor)_produces the physical redshift-space ($s-$space): ${\bm s}_= K({\bm \Omega},z) ~ {\bm \sigma}$,_that is isomorphic to the_observable ${_\sigma}$-space, but has actual distance_units that are_dependent on_a particular cosmological_set of parameters [$\Omega$]{} and the_redshift $z$. The_$K({\bm \Omega},z)$ function is chosen so_that_the physical redshift-space_is_related_to real_space ${\bm r}$_by_a unitary_Jacobian_independent of redshift. So that no_additional_scaling is needed, and the only remaining_difference will be precisely_in_shape. That is why_${\bm \sigma}$ and ${\bm s}$_are more alike, and thus can_both be_named redshift-space;_${\bm \sigma}$ is the observable redshift-space while ${\bm s}$ is the_physical redshift-space. Then, the transformation to_real-space necessarily goes through_redshift distortions.

Furthermore,_when_we introduce peculiar_non-relativistic_velocities in_this scheme, we will show that it_is possible_to keep the same relation between_observable and physical redshift-spaces,_${\bm_s}$ and ${\bm \sigma}$, and that_the @kaiser87 effect is recovered independently_of redshift (see Section \[sec:sec3\]). That_is,_now_redshift-space will also show an_additional gravitational distortion with respect to_real-space.

To solve for_the relation between real-space and redshift-space, we_will_rely on projected correlations. Projections of_the_2PCF in the plane of the_sky_have_been widely used to avoid_the complications of dealing with unknown_components in redshift-space [e.g., @davis_peebles_83]. This has the advantage_that