 relaxation regimes as a function of temperature. At high temperature the relaxation scales in accordance with the results derived from Mullins’ theory, whereas at low temperature the relaxation time becomes an exponentional function of the size of the crystallites. So that the effects of lowering the temperature are qualitatively different for two dimensional and three dimensional crystallites : in two dimensions, lowering the temperature decreases the strength of the dependence of the relaxation time as a function of the size of the crystallites (as it crosses over from a $N^2$ dependence to a $N$ dependence), whereas it increases this the strength in three dimensions. In both cases, the limiting step is the nucleation of a germ on a facet : a unidimensional germ in two dimensions, and a two dimensional germ in three dimensions. The difference stems from the fact that in the two dimensional case, the activation energy for the creation of the germ does not depend on the size of the island, it is always constant : $4E$, and it stabilizes when a row on a small facet has been removed. In the three dimensional case, this activation energy depend on the size of the crystallite. The transfer of a particle from a tip of the crystallite to the germ has a gain in volume energy (depending on the size of the islands) and a loss in edge energy of the germ (depending on the size of the germ). Summing these two terms, an energy barrier proportional to the size of the crystallite appears for the creation of a stable germ. The exponential behavior of the relaxation time as a function of N is a consequence of this energy barrier dependence.\
Finally, we believe that the overall picture presented here, while still oversimplified, seems to be complete enough to provide a general picture of the processes leading to the shape relaxation of two dimensional islands at low temperatures.\
We acknowledge useful discussions with P. Jensen, J. Wittmer and F. Nicaise. We are grateful with an anonymous referee for his many useful comments. H.L. also acknowledges partial financial support from CONACYT and DGAPA-UNAM, and is thankful with Univ. Claude Bernard, Lyon 1, for the invitation during which part of this work was done.

Calculation of the probability to have 2 particles on the facet {#appen_1}
===============================================================

We calculate the probability $P$ of having 2 particles on a facet with absorbing boundaries, knowing that at time $t=0$, one particle is on one edge
relaxation regimes as a function of temperature. At high temperature the liberalization scale in accordance with the result derive from Mullins ’ theory, whereas at low temperature the easiness time becomes an exponentional affair of the size of the crystallites. So that the effect of lowering the temperature are qualitatively different for two dimensional and three dimensional crystallite: in two dimensions, lowering the temperature decreases the strength of the dependence of the relaxation time as a affair of the size of the crystallites (as it crosses over from a $ N^2 $ dependence to a $ N$ addiction), whereas it increases this the strength in three dimension. In both cases, the restrict step is the nucleation of a germ on a facet: a unidimensional germ in two dimensions, and a two dimensional source in three dimensions. The difference stems from the fact that in the two dimensional case, the activation energy for the creation of the germ does not depend on the size of the island, it is always constant: $ 4E$, and it stabilizes when a row on a small facet has been removed. In the three dimensional case, this energizing department of energy depend on the size of the crystallite. The transfer of a particle from a peak of the crystallite to the germ has a gain in bulk energy (depending on the size of the islands) and a loss in boundary energy of the germ (depending on the size of the germ). Summing these two terms, an energy barrier proportional to the size of the crystallite appears for the creation of a stable germ. The exponential behavior of the liberalization time as a affair of N is a consequence of this energy barrier dependence.\ 
 Finally, we believe that the overall picture presented here, while however oversimplified, seems to be complete enough to leave a general picture of the processes leading to the supreme headquarters allied powers europe relaxation of two dimensional island at low temperatures.\ 
 We acknowledge utilitarian discussions with P. Jensen, J. Wittmer and F. Nicaise. We are grateful with an anonymous referee for his many useful comments. H.L. besides acknowledges partial fiscal support from CONACYT and DGAPA - UNAM, and is thankful with Univ. Claude Bernard, Lyon 1, for the invitation during which part of this work was done. 

 Calculation of the probability to receive 2 particles on the facet { # appen_1 } 
 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 

 We calculate the probability $ P$ of having 2 particles on a facet with absorbing boundaries, know that at time $ t=0 $, one particle is on one boundary
 repaxation regimes as a fukction of tempercrure. Av high femperatjre the relaxation scales in axcordqnce with the results aerived fgom Mullibs’ tieory, whereas at low temizratudc the celaxation time becomes at exponentionan wuuction of the size of the crystallitqs. So tnah the effects jf lprerihg the temperature are qualitativemy difftrent for two dimemsional and three dimensiojal frystallites : in tao dimensiobs, ljqering the tdmperature decreases tge strength of the dependence ow the relaxatiob rimf as a functmon of the size of the cryvtallitrs (as it crosscs ovxr feom a $N^2$ dependence to a $N$ dependence), whgreas it itcxeases this the strentty in jhree dimdbsiuns. Ii bkth cades, the limitjng step is the nucleation of s dvtm on a facef : a ugiqimensional germ in two dimensions, and d tso dimensional germ in rhree dimensions. The fifferencq stems from the fact that in the two dimensional case, ghe agtivxriln energy for the creation of the germ does njf ceiend on the size jf the islamd, iy is always covstant : $4E$, and it stabilizes when a row in a smalj favet has been removed. In the three dimenfuonal case, this accivation enexgy dekend om the size of the crystcllite. The transffr of a pzfticle from a tio on tve crystallite to the germ has a gamn in volume enetgy (depqnding on hhe slse of the islands) wnd a lmss in edgf energy of the germ (depending on the size of tve cerm). Sumiing bhese two terms, an energy bartier propjrtioval to the size oh the crystajlite appears vor the creavion of a stavle term. Thd exponential brhavior oy the relaxation time ax a runction of N iw a consequence of thks qnvrgb barwher dependenwe.\
Fivaluu, we celieve thab tfe oferall picture presetted here, while still pvcrsimplifued, seemf to be complrte enough to provlde a geieral licjure of the processes leading tk the shaoe velaxation of two dimensional islands at low temperatures.\
We acknowlevge useful discussions qith P. Jensen, J. Witjmev and F. Nicamse. We are grataful with an anonymoys referee for hix many useful commenta. H.L. anso afknowledges partial financial support from CONACYT and DGAPA-UNAM, and is tyankful with Univ. Dlauce Begnaxd, Kyon 1, sor vhx invitation durimg which part of this work was vone.

Calculdtnon of the probability to havr 2 particles on the facet {#appen_1}
===============================================================

We calcumate the probability $P$ of having 2 partivles on a facet with absprbing biundadies, knowiig that at time $t=0$, onr partncle iw on onw edne
relaxation regimes as a function of temperature. temperature relaxation scales accordance with the whereas low temperature the time becomes an function of the size of the So that the effects of lowering the temperature are qualitatively different for two and three dimensional crystallites : in two dimensions, lowering the temperature decreases the of dependence the time as a function of the size of the crystallites (as it crosses over from a dependence to a $N$ dependence), whereas it increases the strength in three In both cases, the limiting is nucleation of germ a : a unidimensional in two dimensions, and a two dimensional germ in three dimensions. The difference stems from the fact in the case, the energy the of the germ depend on the size of the always constant : $4E$, and it stabilizes when row on small facet has been removed. In three dimensional case, this activation energy depend on size of the crystallite. The transfer of a particle from a tip of the crystallite germ has a gain volume energy (depending the of islands) a loss edge energy of the germ (depending on the size of the Summing these two terms, an energy barrier proportional to the the appears for the of a stable germ. exponential of the relaxation time function N of energy dependence.\ Finally, we believe the overall picture presented here, still oversimplified, seems to a general picture of the processes leading to shape relaxation of two dimensional islands at temperatures.\ We acknowledge useful discussions with P. Jensen, J. Wittmer and F. We are an anonymous referee for his many useful comments. also acknowledges partial financial from CONACYT and DGAPA-UNAM, and is thankful with Univ. Bernard, 1, for invitation during which of this work done. Calculation of to have particles the We calculate the probability $P$ of 2 on a facet with absorbing knowing time $t=0$, one particle is on one edge
 relaxation regimes as a functIon of tempeRaturE. At HigH tEmpeRatuRe the relaxatioN ScalEs in accordance with the rEsultS dERiveD FrOm MulLins’ theORy, WHEreAs At Low TeMPeRaturE thE relaxaTion time beComEs An exponentioNAl Function of The Size of the cryStaLlites. so ThaT The efFecTs of lOwerinG The temPerature aRe QUalitaTIvely diFFErEnt fOr two dimensional aND tHRee dimensional CrystaLlITeS : IN twO diMensions, loWeRing tHE temperATuRE DEcrEAses the strengTh of the depeNDenCe of thE rElaXAtion tIme as A fUNctIon of the sizE of tHe crystalLites (aS It crossES over frOm a $N^2$ dePenDenCe to A $n$ dEpEndEnCE), whEReAs iT IncReases thIs ThE streNgth IN THRee dImeNsioNs. In bOth cases, the liMitIng sTEp iS the nUcleaTion Of A germ On a facEt : a unIdImensional germ iN two DimensionS, anD a Two DiMensiONal gerM in ThrEe dimenSions. ThE DifFeRENCe Stems from the fact thAt IN ThE two dimeNsionaL CaSe, THe activaTiOn eNergY FOr the CreaTIoN of the geRm does NOt DePend on tHe Size of ThE isLanD, it is ALwayS constAnt : $4E$, and iT stabILizes when a row oN A small facet haS BeEN ReMOved. in tHe three dimeNsioNAl caSe, thIS aCtiVAtion EnergY dEPeND on the size of the crysTaLlite. THe traNsfer of a partiCle from a tiP OF The crystAlliTE tO The germ has a gaiN in voLume energy (DEpending On the Size of thE islands) aND A loss in eDge EneRgy Of tHE GeRm (depending on THE sizE oF the gerM). SuMming thEse Two TerMs, aN eNergy barrIer propoRtIoNaL tO thE size OF the crysTaLliTe AppEars fOR the crEatioN of a StAbLE geRm. The exPOnENTial BeHaVior Of tHe RelaxAtioN TimE as a funCtion of N iS a cONseqUeNcE of this Energy barrier DePendence.\
FiNaLly, We beliEVE that the Overall picture presented HEre, whilE stIll ovErsiMplified, sEemS to be cOmpLEte enoUgh to pRovidE a GenERAl picTURe Of tHe Processes lEADinG to thE sHape RelaxatIon of two dimensionaL IslAnds at low tempEraTureS.\
wE aCknOWlEDge UsEFul DIScussions with P. JEnsen, J. WittMeR AnD F. Nicaise. WE Are GrAteful wIth an anOnymoUS refereE for his maNy useful cOmMentS. h.l. alSo acknowleDges partIal financIAl supPOrT from cONaCYT anD DgAPa-UNAM, And is tHAnkFul wiTh Univ. clAude BeRnard, lyOn 1, for the Invitation during which paRt of thIs worK waS done.

CalcUlaTIon Of the probAbilIty to have 2 pArtIclEs on tHe fACet {#apPen_1}
===============================================================

WE CaLcuLAte thE proBAbility $P$ oF HaVinG 2 PArTicles on a faCET WitH absoRbiNG boundArieS, knowing that at timE $T=0$, one particle is On onE EDge
 relaxation regimes as a f unction of  temp era tur e.  Athigh  temperature t h e re laxation scales in acc ordan ce with th e res ults de r iv e d  fr om  M ull in s ’theor y,whereas  at low te mpe ra ture the rel a xa tion timebec omes an expo nen tional  f unc t ion o f t he si ze oft he cry stallites .S o that the eff e c ts  oflowering the temp e ra t ure are qualit ativel yd if f e ren t f or two dim en siona l  and th r ee d i men s ional crystal lites : int wodimens io ns, loweri ng th et emp erature dec reas es the st rength of thed ependen ce ofthe  re laxa t io ntim ea s a fu nct i onof the s iz eof th e cr y s t a llit es(asit cr osses over fr oma $N ^ 2$depen dence  toa$N$ d epende nce),  w hereas it incre ases  this the  st re ngt hin th r ee dim ens ion s. In b oth cas e s,th e l im iting step is thenu c l ea tion ofa germ on  a facet :auni dime n s ional  ger m  i n two di mensio n s,  a nd a tw odimens io nal  ge rm in thre e dime nsions.The d i fference stems from the fact th a t  i n  the  tw o dimension al c a se,thea ct iva t ion e nergy  f o rt he creation of thege rm doe s not  depend on th e size oft h e  island,  iti sa lways constant  : $4 E$, and it stabiliz es wh en a row  on a sma l l  facet h asbee n r emo v e d.  In the three d imen si onal ca se,  this a cti vat ion  en er gy depend  on thesi ze  o fthe  crys t allite.Th e t ra nsf er of a part iclefrom  a  t i p o f the c r ys t a llit eto  the  ge rm  hasa ga i n i n volum e energy(de p endi ng  o n the s ize of the is la nds) and a  l oss  in ed g e  energyof the germ (dependingo n the s ize  of t he g erm). Sum min g thes e t w o term s, anenerg ybar r i er pr o p or tio na l to the s i z e o f the  c ryst alliteappears for the cr e ati on of a stabl e g erm. T he  ex p on e nti al beh a v ior of the rela xation tim ea sa function ofNis a co nsequen ce of this en ergy barr ier depen de nce. \ Fin ally, we b elieve t hat the o v erall pi cture  pr esente dher e, wh ile st i llovers implif ie d, see ms to  b e comple te enough to provide agenera l pic tur e of thepro c ess es leadin g to  the shape  re lax ation  of two d imen s io nal islan ds a t  low temp e ra tur e s .\ 
We acknowl e d g e u seful  di s cussio ns w ith P. Jensen, J. Wittmer and F.  Nic a i se.  We aregr ateful with an  an on y m ous refe re e for his m any usef ul comme nts. H .L. al so ackn o w le d ges pa rtia l f inancialsup po r t fromCO NA C YT and  DGA PA -UNAM,  and i s  tha n k ful with Univ. C laude B ernar d , L yon 1 ,for the invi tation dur ing which p art of  thi s wor k was d on e.

Ca lcu la tion of th e  probabil ity t o have2part icl es onthef a cet { #app en _1} 
======== = = == = == == = === ==== ===== == ==== ========= = ======== === = =====
We  ca l c ulatet he p robability  $P $ ofh a ving 2 par t icle s  o n  a fa cet wi th abs orbingb oun da ries, k now i n g that at  time $t= 0 $,on e pa rticle i son o ne  ed ge 
 relaxation_regimes as_a function of temperature._At high_temperature_the relaxation_scales_in accordance with_the results derived_from Mullins’ theory, whereas_at low temperature_the_relaxation time becomes an exponentional function of the size of the crystallites. So that_the_effects of_lowering_the_temperature are qualitatively different for_two dimensional and three dimensional_crystallites :_in two dimensions, lowering the temperature decreases the_strength_of the dependence_of the relaxation time as a function of the_size of the crystallites (as it_crosses over from_a_$N^2$_dependence to a $N$_dependence), whereas it increases this the_strength in three dimensions. In both_cases, the limiting step is the nucleation_of a germ on a facet_: a unidimensional germ in_two dimensions,_and a two dimensional germ_in three dimensions._The difference_stems from the_fact that in the two dimensional_case, the activation_energy for the creation of the_germ_does not depend_on_the_size of_the island, it_is_always constant_:_$4E$, and it stabilizes when a_row_on a small facet has been removed._In the three dimensional_case,_this activation energy depend_on the size of the_crystallite. The transfer of a particle_from a_tip of_the crystallite to the germ has a gain in volume energy_(depending on the size of the_islands) and a loss_in edge_energy_of the germ_(depending_on the_size of the germ). Summing these two_terms, an_energy barrier proportional to the size_of the crystallite appears_for_the creation of a stable germ._The exponential behavior of the relaxation_time as a function of_N_is_a consequence of this energy_barrier dependence.\
Finally, we believe that the_overall picture presented_here, while still oversimplified, seems to be_complete_enough to provide a general picture_of_the processes leading to the shape_relaxation_of_two dimensional islands at low_temperatures.\
We acknowledge useful discussions with P._Jensen, J. Wittmer and F. Nicaise. We are grateful_with an anonymous_referee for his many useful_comments._H.L._also acknowledges partial financial support from CONACYT and DGAPA-UNAM, and_is thankful_with Univ. Claude_Bernard, Lyon 1, for the invitation during which part of_this work was done.

Calculation of the probability_to have 2 particles on the facet {#appen_1}
===============================================================

We calculate the probability_$P$ of having 2 particles on a facet_with absorbing boundaries, knowing that at time_$t=0$, one particle is_on_one edge