
& = e^{i B_2(\zeta)} V e^{-i B_1(\zeta)},   \quad \zeta\in{{\mathbb{C}}},    {\label}{2.14o}\end{aligned}$$ where we have set $$\begin{aligned}
\begin{split}
B_1(\zeta) =  \zeta (A_1^*-{\overline}z)^{-1} + {{\overline}\zeta} (A_1 - z I_{{{\mathcal H}}_1})^{-1} = B_1(\zeta)^*,   \\
B_2(\zeta) = \zeta (A_2^*-{\overline}z)^{-1} + {{\overline}\zeta} (A_2 - z I_{{{\mathcal H}}_2})^{-1} = B_2(\zeta)^*.   {\label}{2.14p}
\end{split}\end{aligned}$$ Consequently, $$\big\|e^{i \zeta (A_2^*-{\overline}z)^{-1}} V e^{-i \zeta (A_1^*-{\overline}z)^{-1}}\big\|_{{{\mathcal B}}({{\mathcal H}}_1,{{\mathcal H}}_2)}
= \|V\|_{{{\mathcal B}}({{\mathcal H}}_1,{{\mathcal H}}_2)},
\quad \zeta \in {{\mathbb{C}}}.    {\label}{2.14q}$$ Since the left-hand side of is entire with respect to $\zeta\in{{\mathbb{C}}}$, the uniform boundedness in and Liouville’s theorem yield that the left-hand side of is actually constant with respect to $\zeta\in{{\mathbb{C}}}$. Thus, the left-hand side of equals its value at $\zeta=0$, allowing one to conclude that $$e^{i \zeta (A_2^*-{\overline}z)^{-1}} V e^{-i \zeta (A_1^*-{\overline}z)^{-1}}  = V, \quad \zeta\in{{\mathbb{C}}}.   {\label}{2.14r}$$ Differentiating with respect to $\zeta$ and subsequently taking $\zeta =0$, then yields $$V (A_1^*-{\overline}z)^{-1} = (A_2^*-{\overline}z)^{-1} V,   {\label}{2.14s}$$ and consequently, $$V A_1^* = A_2^* V \, \text{ on } \, {\text{\rm{dom}}}(A_1^*
& = e^{i B_2(\zeta) } V e^{-i B_1(\zeta) },    \quad \zeta\in{{\mathbb{C } } },     { \label}{2.14o}\end{aligned}$$ where we have set $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 \begin{split } 
 B_1(\zeta) =   \zeta (A_1^*-{\overline}z)^{-1 } + { { \overline}\zeta } (A_1 - z I_{{{\mathcal H}}_1})^{-1 } = B_1(\zeta)^ *,    \\ 
 B_2(\zeta) = \zeta (A_2^*-{\overline}z)^{-1 } + { { \overline}\zeta } (A_2 - z I_{{{\mathcal H}}_2})^{-1 } = B_2(\zeta)^ *.    { \label}{2.14p } 
 \end{split}\end{aligned}$$ Consequently, $ $ \big\|e^{i \zeta (A_2^*-{\overline}z)^{-1 } } V e^{-i \zeta (A_1^*-{\overline}z)^{-1}}\big\|_{{{\mathcal B}}({{\mathcal H}}_1,{{\mathcal H}}_2) } 
 = \|V\|_{{{\mathcal B}}({{\mathcal H}}_1,{{\mathcal H}}_2) }, 
 \quad \zeta \in { { \mathbb{C } } }.     { \label}{2.14q}$$ Since the left - bridge player slope of is entire with respect to $ \zeta\in{{\mathbb{C}}}$, the uniform finiteness in and Liouville ’s theorem yield that the left - hand slope of is actually constant with respect to $ \zeta\in{{\mathbb{C}}}$. therefore, the leftover - hand side of equal its value at $ \zeta=0 $, allowing one to conclude that $ $ e^{i \zeta (A_2^*-{\overline}z)^{-1 } } five e^{-i \zeta (A_1^*-{\overline}z)^{-1 } }   = V, \quad \zeta\in{{\mathbb{C } } }.    { \label}{2.14r}$$ Differentiating with respect to $ \zeta$ and subsequently taking $ \zeta = 0 $, then yields $ $ V (A_1^*-{\overline}z)^{-1 } = (A_2^*-{\overline}z)^{-1 } V,    { \label}{2.14s}$$ and consequently, $ $ volt A_1^ * = A_2^ * V \, \text { on } \, { \text{\rm{dom}}}(A_1^ *

& = e^{l B_2(\zeta)} V e^{-i B_1(\zeta)},   \quaa \zeta\in{{\mathbb{C}}},    {\labxl}{2.14o}\end{amigned}$$ wfere we have set $$\begin{alignev}
\begun{splut}
B_1(\zeta) =  \zeta (A_1^*-{\overlive}z)^{-1} + {{\overpine}\zeta} (A_1 - e I_{{{\mathcal H}}_1})^{-1} = B_1(\zevz)^*,   \\
B_2(\zebc) = \zefw (A_2^*-{\orecline}z)^{-1} + {{\overling}\zeta} (A_2 - z I_{{{\kathcal H}}_2})^{-1} = B_2(\zeda)^*.   {\label}{2.14p}
\end{split}\end{aligned}$$ Consequenely, $$\big\|r^{i \zeta (A_2^*-{\overling}z)^{-1}} V t^{-i \seta (A_1^*-{\overline}z)^{-1}}\big\|_{{{\mathcal B}}({{\mathcal H}}_1,{{\mafhcal H}}_2)}
= \|V\|_{{{\mathcal B}}({{\mayhcal H}}_1,{{\mathcal H}}_2)},
\quad \zeta \ln {{\mwthbb{C}}}.    {\label}{2.14q}$$ Slnce the ledt-hage side of is entire wiuh respect tk $\zeta\in{{\mathbb{C}}}$, the uniform bouvdednzss in and Oiiuvlnle’s theoren yiejd that the left-hand side og is actually gonstent qith respect to $\zeta\ii{{\mathbb{C}}}$. Thus, the lest-hand sige of equals its vaouw at $\eeta=0$, dllodung ont tp donclufe vhat $$e^{i \zetz (A_2^*-{\overline}z)^{-1}} V e^{-i \zeta (A_1^*-{\overlime}s)^{-1}}  = V, \quad \zetz\in{{\matrbf{C}}}.   {\label}{2.14r}$$ Differentiating with respecu to $\aeta$ and subsequently tqking $\zeta =0$, then yielfs $$V (A_1^*-{\ovewline}z)^{-1} = (A_2^*-{\overline}z)^{-1} V,   {\label}{2.14s}$$ and consequently, $$V D_1^* = A_2^* T \, \terb{ ub } \, {\text{\rm{dom}}}(A_1^*
& = e^{i B_2(\zeta)} V e^{-i B_1(\zeta)}, {\label}{2.14o}\end{aligned}$$ we have $$\begin{aligned} \begin{split} B_1(\zeta) (A_1 z I_{{{\mathcal H}}_1})^{-1} B_1(\zeta)^*, \\ B_2(\zeta) \zeta (A_2^*-{\overline}z)^{-1} + {{\overline}\zeta} (A_2 - I_{{{\mathcal H}}_2})^{-1} = B_2(\zeta)^*. {\label}{2.14p} \end{split}\end{aligned}$$ Consequently, $$\big\|e^{i \zeta (A_2^*-{\overline}z)^{-1}} V e^{-i \zeta B}}({{\mathcal H}}_1,{{\mathcal H}}_2)} = \|V\|_{{{\mathcal B}}({{\mathcal H}}_1,{{\mathcal H}}_2)}, \quad \zeta \in {{\mathbb{C}}}. {\label}{2.14q}$$ the side is with respect to $\zeta\in{{\mathbb{C}}}$, the uniform boundedness in and Liouville’s theorem yield that the left-hand side is actually constant with respect to $\zeta\in{{\mathbb{C}}}$. Thus, left-hand side of equals value at $\zeta=0$, allowing one conclude $$e^{i \zeta V \zeta = V, \quad {\label}{2.14r}$$ Differentiating with respect to $\zeta$ and subsequently taking $\zeta =0$, then yields $$V (A_1^*-{\overline}z)^{-1} = (A_2^*-{\overline}z)^{-1} {\label}{2.14s}$$ and A_1^* = V \text{ } \, {\text{\rm{dom}}}(A_1^*

& = e^{i B_2(\zeta)} V e^{-i B_1(\zeta)},   \quad \zeta\in{{\Mathbb{C}}},    {\labEl}{2.14o}\enD{alIgnEd}$$ WherE we hAve set $$\begin{aliGNed}
\bEgin{split}
B_1(\zeta) =  \zeta (A_1^*-{\oveRline}Z)^{-1} + {{\oVErliNE}\zEta} (A_1 - z i_{{{\mathcaL h}}_1})^{-1} = B_1(\ZETa)^*,   \\
B_2(\ZeTa) = \ZetA (A_2^*-{\OVeRline}Z)^{-1} + {{\ovErline}\zEta} (A_2 - z I_{{{\mathCal h}}_2})^{-1} = B_2(\Zeta)^*.   {\label}{2.14p}
\enD{SpLit}\end{aligNed}$$ consequently, $$\Big\|E^{i \zeta (a_2^*-{\oVerLIne}z)^{-1}} V E^{-i \zEta (A_1^*-{\oVerlinE}Z)^{-1}}\big\|_{{{\maThcal B}}({{\matHcAL H}}_1,{{\mathCAl H}}_2)}
= \|V\|_{{{\matHCAl b}}({{\matHcal H}}_1,{{\mathcal H}}_2)},
\quad \ZEtA \In {{\mathbb{C}}}.    {\label}{2.14Q}$$ Since ThE LeFT-HanD siDe of is entiRe With rESpect to $\ZEtA\IN{{\MatHBb{C}}}$, the uniform Boundedness IN anD LiouvIlLe’s THeorem Yield ThAT thE left-hand siDe of Is actuallY constANt with rESpect to $\Zeta\in{{\MatHbb{c}}}$. ThuS, ThE lEft-HaND siDE oF eqUAls Its value At $\ZeTa=0$, allOwinG ONE To coNclUde tHat $$e^{i \Zeta (A_2^*-{\overline}Z)^{-1}} V e^{-I \zetA (a_1^*-{\ovErlinE}z)^{-1}}  = V, \quAd \zeTa\In{{\matHbb{C}}}.   {\laBel}{2.14r}$$ DIfFerentiating witH resPect to $\zetA$ anD sUbsEqUentlY Taking $\ZetA =0$, thEn yieldS $$V (A_1^*-{\overLIne}Z)^{-1} = (A_2^*-{\OVERlIne}z)^{-1} V,   {\label}{2.14s}$$ and consEqUENtLy, $$V A_1^* = A_2^* V \, \teXt{ on } \, {\teXT{\rM{dOM}}}(A_1^*

& = e^{i B_2(\zeta)} V e^ {-i B_1(\z eta)} ,  \q ua d \z eta\ in{{\mathbb{C} } },   {\label}{2.14o}\end{ align ed } $$ w h er e wehave se t  $ $ \ beg in {a lig ne d }\begi n{s plit}
B _1(\zeta)= \z eta (A_1^*-{ \ ov erline}z)^ {-1 } + {{\overl ine }\zeta }(A_ 1  - zI_{ {{\ma thcalH }}_1}) ^{-1} = B _1 ( \zeta) ^ *,   \\ B _2 (\ze ta) = \zeta (A_2^ * -{ \ overline}z)^{- 1} + { {\ o ve r l ine }\z eta} (A_2-z I_{ { {\mathc a lH } } _2} ) ^{-1} = B_2(\ zeta)^*.  { \la bel}{2 .1 4p} \end{s plit} \e n d{a ligned}$$ C onse quently,$$\big \ |e^{i \ z eta (A_ 2^*-{\ ove rli ne}z ) ^{ -1 }}Ve ^{- i  \ zet a  (A _1^*-{\o ve rl ine}z )^{- 1 } } \ big\ |_{ {{\m athca l B}}({{\math cal  H}} _ 1,{ {\mat hcalH}}_ 2) }
= \ |V\|_{ {{\ma th cal B}}({{\math calH}}_1,{{\ mat hc alH} }_2)} , 
\quad  \z eta  \in {{ \mathbb { C}} }.  { \label}{2.14q}$$ S in c e  t he left- hand s i de  o f  is enti re  wi th r e s pectto $ \ ze ta\in{{\ mathbb { C} }} $, theun iformbo und edn ess i n  and  Liouv ille’s t heore m  yield that th e  left-hand si d eo f  i s  act ual ly constant  wit h  res pect to  $\ z eta\i n{{\m at h bb { C}}}$. Thus, the le ft -handsideof equals its  value at$ \ z eta=0$,allo w in g  one to conclu de th at $$e^{i\ zeta (A_ 2^*-{ \overlin e}z)^{-1} } V e^{-i\ze ta(A_ 1^* - { \o verline}z)^{- 1 } }  =  V , \quad  \z eta\in{ {\m ath bb{ C}} }.    {\labe l}{2.14r }$ $Di ff ere ntiat i ng withre spe ct  to  $\ze t a$ and  subs eque nt ly tak ing $\z e ta = 0$,th en  yie lds  $ $V (A _1^* - {\o verline }z)^{-1}= ( A _2^* -{ \o verline }z)^{-1} V,  { \label}{2. 14 s}$ $ andc o nsequent ly, $$V A_1^* = A_2^* V \, \tex t{on }\, { \text{\rm {do m}}}(A _1^ * 

& =_e^{i B_2(\zeta)}_V e^{-i B_1(\zeta)}, _ \quad_\zeta\in{{\mathbb{C}}},_ __{\label}{2.14o}\end{aligned}$$ where we_have set $$\begin{aligned}
\begin{split}
B_1(\zeta)_=  \zeta (A_1^*-{\overline}z)^{-1}_+ {{\overline}\zeta} (A_1_-_z I_{{{\mathcal H}}_1})^{-1} = B_1(\zeta)^*,   \\
B_2(\zeta) = \zeta (A_2^*-{\overline}z)^{-1} + {{\overline}\zeta} (A_2_-_z I_{{{\mathcal_H}}_2})^{-1}_=_B_2(\zeta)^*.   {\label}{2.14p}
\end{split}\end{aligned}$$ Consequently,_$$\big\|e^{i \zeta (A_2^*-{\overline}z)^{-1}} V e^{-i_\zeta (A_1^*-{\overline}z)^{-1}}\big\|_{{{\mathcal_B}}({{\mathcal H}}_1,{{\mathcal H}}_2)}
= \|V\|_{{{\mathcal B}}({{\mathcal H}}_1,{{\mathcal H}}_2)},
\quad \zeta_\in_{{\mathbb{C}}}.  _ {\label}{2.14q}$$ Since the left-hand side of is entire_with respect to $\zeta\in{{\mathbb{C}}}$, the uniform_boundedness in and_Liouville’s_theorem_yield that the left-hand_side of is actually constant with_respect to $\zeta\in{{\mathbb{C}}}$. Thus, the left-hand_side of equals its value at $\zeta=0$,_allowing one to conclude that $$e^{i_\zeta (A_2^*-{\overline}z)^{-1}} V e^{-i \zeta_(A_1^*-{\overline}z)^{-1}} _= V, \quad \zeta\in{{\mathbb{C}}}. _ {\label}{2.14r}$$ Differentiating_with respect_to $\zeta$ and_subsequently taking $\zeta =0$, then yields_$$V (A_1^*-{\overline}z)^{-1} =_(A_2^*-{\overline}z)^{-1} V,   {\label}{2.14s}$$ and_consequently,_$$V A_1^* =_A_2^*_V_\, \text{_on } \,_{\text{\rm{dom}}}(A_1^*