 In practice one can live with fewer event pairs for event mixing, by replacing in (\[36\]) the number $N_{\rm ev}$ by a much smaller number $N'_{\rm
  ev}$. As long as $N'_{\rm ev}(N'_{\rm ev}-1) \gg N_{\rm ev}$ one can still ensure that the contribution of the denominator to the statistical error of the final correlation function is negligible [@Comm2].

The correlator $C^{II}$ differs from $C^{I}$ only by the different normalization. It can be constructed by taking the ratio of the following two expressions [@Zajc84]: $$\begin{aligned}
 \label{38}
   P_2(\bbox{p}_1,\bbox{p}_2) &=& 
   {E_{\bbox{p}_1} \, E_{\bbox{p}_2} \over N^c_{\rm pairs}}
   \sum_{i=1}^{N_{\rm ev}} \tilde\nu_{i,i}(\bbox{p}_1,\bbox{p}_2) \,,
 \\
 \label{39}
   P_1(\bbox{p}_1) P_1(\bbox{p}_2) &=& 
   {E_{\bbox{p}_1} \, E_{\bbox{p}_2} \over N^u_{\rm pairs}}
   \sum_{i,j=1 \atop i\ne j}^{N_{\rm ev}}
   \tilde\nu_{i,j}(\bbox{p}_1, \bbox{p}_2) \,.
 \end{aligned}$$ $N^c_{\rm pairs}$ and $N^u_{\rm pairs}$ are the total numbers of “correlated” and “uncorrelated” pion pairs, respectively: $$\begin{aligned}
   N^c_{\rm pairs} &=& N_{\rm ev} \cdot \langle n(n-1)\rangle \,, 
 \\
   N^u_{\rm pairs} &=& N_{\rm ev}(N_{\rm ev}-1) \cdot 
                       \langle n \rangle^2 \,.
 \end{aligned}$$

Conclusions {#sec6}
===========

We have shown that in principle the normalization of the two-particle Bose-Einstein correlation function contains valuable information on the the multiplicity distribution of the event ensemble. Both
In practice one can live with fewer event pair for consequence mixing, by replacing in (\[36\ ]) the numeral $ N_{\rm ev}$ by a a lot smaller number $ N'_{\rm 
   ev}$. As long as $ N'_{\rm ev}(N'_{\rm ev}-1) \gg N_{\rm ev}$ one can however ensure that the contribution of the denominator to the statistical error of the concluding correlation coefficient function is negligible [ @Comm2 ]. 

 The correlator $ C^{II}$ differs from $ C^{I}$ only by the unlike normalization. It can be constructed by lead the ratio of the following two expressions [ @Zajc84 ]: $ $ \begin{aligned } 
  \label{38 } 
    P_2(\bbox{p}_1,\bbox{p}_2) & = & 
    { E_{\bbox{p}_1 } \, E_{\bbox{p}_2 } \over N^c_{\rm pair } } 
    \sum_{i=1}^{N_{\rm ev } } \tilde\nu_{i, i}(\bbox{p}_1,\bbox{p}_2) \, , 
  \\ 
  \label{39 } 
    P_1(\bbox{p}_1) P_1(\bbox{p}_2) & = & 
    { E_{\bbox{p}_1 } \, E_{\bbox{p}_2 } \over N^u_{\rm pairs } } 
    \sum_{i, j=1 \atop i\ne j}^{N_{\rm ev } } 
    \tilde\nu_{i, j}(\bbox{p}_1, \bbox{p}_2) \, . 
  \end{aligned}$$ $ N^c_{\rm pairs}$ and $ N^u_{\rm pairs}$ are the total numbers of “ correlate ” and “ uncorrelated ” pion pairs, respectively: $ $ \begin{aligned } 
    N^c_{\rm pairs } & = & N_{\rm ev } \cdot \langle n(n-1)\rangle \, , 
  \\ 
    N^u_{\rm pairs } & = & N_{\rm ev}(N_{\rm ev}-1) \cdot 
                        \langle n \rangle^2 \, . 
  \end{aligned}$$ 

 Conclusions { # sec6 } 
 = = = = = = = = = = = 

 We have shown that in rationale the normalization of the two - atom Bose - Einstein correlation function contains valuable information on the the numerousness distribution of the event ensemble. Both
 In practice one can live wlth fewer event kaurs foc event mixing, cy replacing in (\[36\]) the number $I_{\rm wv}$ by a much smaller number $N'_{\rm
  ev}$. Ws long qs $N'_{\cm ev}(N'_{\rm ev}-1) \gg N_{\cj ev}$ onc can dtiln ensure that tme contribudion of the detooiuator to the statistical error of thq final clrrelation funstiom is hvgoigible [@Comm2].

The correlator $C^{IJ}$ diffegs from $C^{I}$ only bu the different normalizatlon. Lt can be construched by takibg trw ratio of tfe following two expreasions [@Zajc84]: $$\begin{aligned}
 \label{38}
   P_2(\bbpx{p}_1,\bbox{p}_2) &=& 
   {E_{\bhmx{p}_1} \, E_{\bbox{p}_2} \over N^c_{\rm pairs}}
   \sum_{i=1}^{N_{\rk ev}} \tikde\nu_{i,i}(\bbox{p}_1,\bbpx{p}_2) \,,
 \\
 \oabel{39}
   P_1(\bbox{p}_1) P_1(\bbox{p}_2) &=& 
   {E_{\bbox{p}_1} \, E_{\bbox{k}_2} \over N^u_{\rk 'airs}}
   \sum_{i,j=1 \atop i\nw h}^{N_{\rm gv}}
   \dildd\bu_{i,g}(\bbkx{'}_1, \bgox{p}_2) \,.
 \fnd{eligned}$$ $N^c_{\rj pairs}$ and $N^u_{\rm pairs}$ are the tjnsl numbers or “corrqlwted” and “uncorrelated” pion pairs, respecuivelg: $$\begin{aligned}
   N^c_{\rm pqirs} &=& N_{\rm ev} \cdot \lanhle n(n-1)\randle \,, 
 \\
   N^u_{\rm pairs} &=& N_{\rm ev}(N_{\rm ev}-1) \cdot 
                       \oajgle n \rangle^2 \,.
 \end{aligned}$$

Conclusions {#sec6}
===========

We hads xhpwn that in prlnciple the normalozwtojn of the two-karticlz Bkse-Einstein correlwtion fonctiob containf vakuable information on the tye multiplicpty eistribution of thz event enseoble. Both
In practice one can live with fewer for mixing, by in (\[36\]) the much number $N'_{\rm ev}$. long as $N'_{\rm ev}-1) \gg N_{\rm ev}$ one can ensure that the contribution of the denominator to the statistical error of the correlation function is negligible [@Comm2]. The correlator $C^{II}$ differs from $C^{I}$ only by different It be by taking the ratio of the following two expressions [@Zajc84]: $$\begin{aligned} \label{38} P_2(\bbox{p}_1,\bbox{p}_2) &=& {E_{\bbox{p}_1} \, \over N^c_{\rm pairs}} \sum_{i=1}^{N_{\rm ev}} \tilde\nu_{i,i}(\bbox{p}_1,\bbox{p}_2) \,, \\ P_1(\bbox{p}_1) P_1(\bbox{p}_2) &=& {E_{\bbox{p}_1} E_{\bbox{p}_2} \over N^u_{\rm pairs}} \sum_{i,j=1 i\ne ev}} \tilde\nu_{i,j}(\bbox{p}_1, \,. $N^c_{\rm and $N^u_{\rm pairs}$ the total numbers of “correlated” and “uncorrelated” pion pairs, respectively: $$\begin{aligned} N^c_{\rm pairs} &=& N_{\rm ev} \cdot n(n-1)\rangle \,, pairs} &=& ev}(N_{\rm \cdot n \rangle^2 \,. {#sec6} =========== We have shown that normalization of the two-particle Bose-Einstein correlation function contains information on the multiplicity distribution of the event Both
 In practice one can live with fEwer event pAirs fOr eVenT mIxinG, by rEplacing in (\[36\]) the nUMber $n_{\rm ev}$ by a much smaller numBer $N'_{\rM
  eV}$. as loNG aS $N'_{\rm eV}(N'_{\rm ev}-1) \gG n_{\rM EV}$ onE cAn StiLl ENsUre thAt tHe contrIbution of tHe dEnOminator to thE StAtistical eRroR of the final cOrrElatioN fUncTIon is NegLigibLe [@Comm2].

tHe corrElator $C^{II}$ DiFFers frOM $C^{I}$ only BY ThE difFerent normalizatiON. IT Can be constructEd by taKiNG tHE RatIo oF the followInG two eXPressioNS [@ZAJC84]: $$\BegIN{aligned}
 \label{38}
   p_2(\bbox{p}_1,\bbox{p}_2) &=& 
   {e_{\BboX{p}_1} \, E_{\bboX{p}_2} \OveR n^c_{\rm paIrs}}
   \suM_{i=1}^{n_{\Rm eV}} \tilde\nu_{i,i}(\bBox{p}_1,\Bbox{p}_2) \,,
 \\
 \labeL{39}
   P_1(\bbox{P}_1) p_1(\bbox{p}_2) &=& 
   {E_{\BBox{p}_1} \, E_{\bbOx{p}_2} \oveR N^u_{\Rm pAirs}}
   \SUm_{I,j=1 \AtoP i\NE j}^{N_{\RM eV}}
   \tiLDe\nU_{i,j}(\bbox{p}_1, \BbOx{P}_2) \,.
 \end{aLignED}$$ $n^C_{\Rm paIrs}$ And $N^U_{\rm paIrs}$ are the totaL nuMberS Of “cOrrelAted” aNd “unCoRrelaTed” pioN pairS, rEspectively: $$\begiN{aliGned}
   N^c_{\rm pAirS} &=& N_{\Rm eV} \cDot \laNGle n(n-1)\rAngLe \,, 
 \\
   N^U_{\rm pairS} &=& N_{\rm ev}(N_{\RM ev}-1) \CdOT 
                       \LAnGle n \rangle^2 \,.
 \end{alignEd}$$

cONcLusions {#sEc6}
===========

We haVE sHoWN that in pRiNciPle tHE NormaLizaTIoN of the twO-partiCLe boSe-EinstEiN correLaTioN fuNctioN ContAins vaLuable inFormaTIon on the the mulTIplicity distrIBuTIOn OF the EveNt ensemble. BOth
 In practice one can livewith fewer  even t p air sforeven t mixing, by r e plac ing in (\[36\]) the nu mber$N _ {\rm ev }$ by  a much sm a l ler  n um ber  $ N '_ {\rm  e v}$. As  long as $ N'_ {\ rm ev}(N'_{\ r mev}-1) \gg  N_ {\rm ev}$ on e c an sti ll  en s ure t hat  thecontri b utionof the de no m inator to thes t at isti cal error of thef in a l correlationfuncti on is n egl igi ble [@Comm 2] .

Th e  correl a to r $ C^{ I I}$ differs f rom $C^{I}$ onl y by t he  di f ferent  norm al i zat ion. It can  beconstruct ed byt aking t h e ratio  of th e f oll owin g  t wo  ex pr e ssi o ns  [@ Z ajc 84]: $$\ be gi n{ali gned } \ labe l{3 8}
  P_2 (\bbox{p}_1,\ bbo x{p} _ 2)&=&    {E _{\b bo x{p}_ 1} \,E_{\b bo x{p}_2} \over N ^c_{ \rm pairs }}  \s um _{i=1 } ^{N_{\ rmev} } \tild e\nu_{i , i}( \b b o x {p }_1,\bbox{p}_2) \, ,\ \ \label{ 39}
 P_ 1( \ bbox{p}_ 1)  P_ 1(\b b o x{p}_ 2) & = &
   {E_{ \bbox{ p }_ 1}  \, E_{ \b box{p} _2 } \ ove r N^u _ {\rm  pairs }}
   \s um_{i , j=1 \atop i\ne j}^{N_{\rm ev } } \ t ilde \nu _{i,j}(\bbo x{p} _ 1, \ bbox { p} _2) \,.
\end{ al i gn e d}$$ $N^c_{\rm pair s} $ and$N^u_ {\rm pairs}$are the to t a l  numbers  of“ co r related” and “ uncor related” p i on pairs , res pectivel y: $$\beg i n {aligned }
  N ^c_ {\r m pa irs} &=& N_{\ r m  ev}  \ cdot \l ang le n(n- 1)\ ran gle  \, ,
 \\
   N ^u_{\rmpa ir s}  & =&N_{\r m  ev}(N_{ \r m e v} -1)  \cdo t  
                \lang l en \ran gl e^ 2 \, .
\e nd{al igne d }$$ 

Concl usions {# sec 6 }
== == == =====
We have shown  t hat in pri nc ipl e then o rmalizat ion of the two-particle Bose-Ei nst ein c orre lation fu nct ion co nta i ns val uableinfor ma tio n on th e th e m ul tiplicityd i str ibuti on  ofthe eve nt ensemble. Both
 In_practice one_can live with fewer_event pairs_for_event mixing,_by_replacing in (\[36\])_the number $N_{\rm_ev}$ by a much_smaller number $N'_{\rm
__ev}$. As long as $N'_{\rm ev}(N'_{\rm ev}-1) \gg N_{\rm ev}$ one can still ensure_that_the contribution_of_the_denominator to the statistical error_of the final correlation function_is negligible_[@Comm2].

The correlator $C^{II}$ differs from $C^{I}$ only by_the_different normalization. It_can be constructed by taking the ratio of the_following two expressions [@Zajc84]: $$\begin{aligned}
 \label{38}
_  P_2(\bbox{p}_1,\bbox{p}_2)_&=&_
_  {E_{\bbox{p}_1} \,_E_{\bbox{p}_2} \over N^c_{\rm pairs}}
  _\sum_{i=1}^{N_{\rm ev}} \tilde\nu_{i,i}(\bbox{p}_1,\bbox{p}_2) \,,
 \\
 \label{39}
_  P_1(\bbox{p}_1) P_1(\bbox{p}_2) &=& 
 _ {E_{\bbox{p}_1} \, E_{\bbox{p}_2} \over N^u_{\rm_pairs}}
   \sum_{i,j=1 \atop_i\ne j}^{N_{\rm_ev}}
   \tilde\nu_{i,j}(\bbox{p}_1, \bbox{p}_2)_\,.
 \end{aligned}$$ $N^c_{\rm_pairs}$ and_$N^u_{\rm pairs}$ are_the total numbers of “correlated” and_“uncorrelated” pion pairs,_respectively: $$\begin{aligned}
   N^c_{\rm pairs}_&=&_N_{\rm ev} \cdot_\langle_n(n-1)\rangle_\,, 
_\\
  _N^u_{\rm_pairs} &=&_N_{\rm_ev}(N_{\rm ev}-1) \cdot 
  __      _   __   _   \langle n_\rangle^2 \,.
 \end{aligned}$$

Conclusions {#sec6}
===========

We have shown_that in_principle the_normalization of the two-particle Bose-Einstein correlation function contains valuable information on_the the multiplicity distribution of the_event ensemble. Both