i,0}| \right) = O_P(\omega_n).\end{aligned}$$ Combining the results, we obtain the statement of the lemma. $\blacksquare$

Let $$\begin{aligned}
\label{Wn}
V &\equiv& \frac{1}{n}\sum_{i_1,i_2 \in N: \overline N(i_1) \cap \overline N(i_2) \ne \varnothing} \left(\hat q_{i_1,S}\hat q_{i_2,S} - q_{i_1,S} q_{i_2,S}\right),  \text{ and }\\ \notag
W &\equiv& \frac{1}{n}\sum_{i_1,i_2 \in N: \overline N(i_1) \cap \overline N(i_2) \ne \varnothing}(q_{i_1,S} q_{i_2,S} - \mathbf{E}_\mathscr{F}[ q_{i_1,S} q_{i_2,S}]).\end{aligned}$$

\[lemm: W\] $$\begin{aligned}
        V = o_P(1), \text{ and } W = o_P(1).
    \end{aligned}$$

**Proof:** The first statement immediately comes by following the proof of Lemma B.21 of [@He/Song:18:WP] and applying Lemma \[lemm: q2\]. The second statement follows precisely as in the same way as Lemma B.22 of [@He/Song:18:WP]. $\blacksquare$

\[lemm: consistency var estimator\] $\hat \sigma_S^2 = \sigma_S^2 + o_P(1)$, where $\sigma_S^2$ is as defined in (\[Var\]).

**Proof:** We can rewrite $$\begin{aligned}
\label{tilde sigma2}
\sigma_S^2 = \frac{1}{nv^4} \sum_{i_1,i_2 \in N: \overline N(i_1) \cap \overline N(i_2) \ne \varnothing} \mathbf{E}_\mathscr{F}[q_{i_1,S} q_{i_2,S}].\end{aligned}$$
i,0}| \right) = O_P(\omega_n).\end{aligned}$$ Combining the results, we obtain the statement of the lemma. $ \blacksquare$ 

 lease $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 \label{Wn } 
 V & \equiv & \frac{1}{n}\sum_{i_1,i_2 \in N: \overline N(i_1) \cap \overline N(i_2) \ne \varnothing } \left(\hat q_{i_1,S}\hat q_{i_2,S } - q_{i_1,S } q_{i_2,S}\right),   \text { and } \\ \notag 
 W & \equiv & \frac{1}{n}\sum_{i_1,i_2 \in N: \overline N(i_1) \cap \overline N(i_2) \ne \varnothing}(q_{i_1,S } q_{i_2,S } - \mathbf{E}_\mathscr{F } [ q_{i_1,S } q_{i_2,S}]).\end{aligned}$$ 

 \[lemm: W\ ] $ $ \begin{aligned } 
         five = o_P(1), \text { and } W = o_P(1). 
     \end{aligned}$$ 

 * * Proof :* * The first statement immediately arrive by following the proof of Lemma B.21 of [ @He / Song:18: WP ] and lend oneself Lemma \[lemm: q2\ ]. The second statement follows precisely as in the like direction as Lemma B.22 of [ @He / Song:18: WP ]. $ \blacksquare$ 

 \[lemm: consistency var estimator\ ] $ \hat \sigma_S^2 = \sigma_S^2 + o_P(1)$, where $ \sigma_S^2 $ is equally defined in (\[Var\ ]). 

 * * Proof :* * We can rewrite $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 \label{tilde sigma2 } 
 \sigma_S^2 = \frac{1}{nv^4 } \sum_{i_1,i_2 \in N: \overline N(i_1) \cap \overline N(i_2) \ne \varnothing } \mathbf{E}_\mathscr{F}[q_{i_1,S } q_{i_2,S}].\end{aligned}$$
i,0}| \rlght) = O_P(\omega_n).\end{aligned}$$ Combining the tewults, xe obtajn the sgatement of the lemma. $\blackseuqre$

Leu $$\begin{aligned}
\label{Dn}
V &\equiv& \frac{1}{n}\sun_{i_1,i_2 \mn N: \overline N(i_1) \cap \ovevjine K(i_2) \ne \tarnothing} \left(\mat q_{i_1,S}\hat x_{i_2,S} - q_{i_1,S} q_{i_2,S}\richg),  \text{ and }\\ \notag
W &\equiv& \frac{1}{n}\sum_{i_1,i_2 \yn N: \ovrrpine N(i_1) \cap \ovgrlint N(y_2) \ne \navnothing}(q_{i_1,S} q_{i_2,S} - \mathbf{E}_\mathscr{F}[ q_{i_1,S} q_{i_2,V}]).\end{aligned}$$

\[lekm: W\] $$\begin{aligned}
        V = o_P(1), \text{ and } W = o_P(1).
    \end{alignee}$$

**Projd:** The first rtatement pkmediately comes by following the proof ow Lemka B.21 of [@He/Wobg:18:WO] and applyiig Lemia \[lemm: q2\]. Thc secong statekent follows pvecisxly qs in the same way as Lemma B.22 of [@He/Song:18:RP]. $\blacksxucre$

\[lemm: consistency vqr estikatos\] $\hag \siema_A^2 = \sjgma_S^2 + o_P(1)$, where $\sigja_S^2$ is as dwfined in (\[Var\]).

**Proof:** Ee bsn rewrite $$\bsgin{alygged}
\label{tilde sigma2}
\sigma_S^2 = \frac{1}{nv^4} \sum_{i_1,i_2 \in N: \overline N(i_1) \cap \overoine N(i_2) \ne \varnothing} \mathbf{E}_\mwthscr{F}[q_{i_1,S} q_{i_2,S}].\end{aligned}$$
i,0}| \right) = O_P(\omega_n).\end{aligned}$$ Combining the results, the of the $\blacksquare$ Let $$\begin{aligned} N: N(i_1) \cap \overline \ne \varnothing} \left(\hat q_{i_2,S} - q_{i_1,S} q_{i_2,S}\right), \text{ and \notag W &\equiv& \frac{1}{n}\sum_{i_1,i_2 \in N: \overline N(i_1) \cap \overline N(i_2) \ne \varnothing}(q_{i_1,S} - \mathbf{E}_\mathscr{F}[ q_{i_1,S} q_{i_2,S}]).\end{aligned}$$ \[lemm: W\] $$\begin{aligned} V = o_P(1), \text{ and } = \end{aligned}$$ The statement immediately comes by following the proof of Lemma B.21 of [@He/Song:18:WP] and applying Lemma \[lemm: The second statement follows precisely as in the way as Lemma B.22 [@He/Song:18:WP]. $\blacksquare$ \[lemm: consistency var $\hat = \sigma_S^2 o_P(1)$, $\sigma_S^2$ as defined in **Proof:** We can rewrite $$\begin{aligned} \label{tilde sigma2} \sigma_S^2 = \frac{1}{nv^4} \sum_{i_1,i_2 \in N: \overline N(i_1) \cap \overline \ne \varnothing}
i,0}| \right) = O_P(\omega_n).\end{aligned}$$ COmbining thE resuLts, We oBtAin tHe stAtement of the leMMa. $\blAcksquare$

Let $$\begin{alignEd}
\labEl{wN}
V &\eqUIv& \Frac{1}{n}\Sum_{i_1,i_2 \in n: \OvERLinE N(I_1) \cAp \oVeRLiNe N(i_2) \nE \vaRnothinG} \left(\hat q_{i_1,s}\haT q_{I_2,S} - q_{i_1,S} q_{i_2,S}\righT),  \TeXt{ and }\\ \notag
w &\eqUiv& \frac{1}{n}\sum_{i_1,I_2 \in n: \overlInE N(i_1) \CAp \oveRliNe N(i_2) \nE \varnoTHing}(q_{i_1,s} q_{i_2,S} - \mathbF{E}_\MAthscr{f}[ Q_{i_1,S} q_{i_2,S}]).\eND{AlIgneD}$$

\[lemm: W\] $$\begin{aligneD}
        v = o_p(1), \Text{ and } W = o_P(1).
    \end{aLigned}$$

**prOOf:** tHE fiRst Statement iMmEdiatELy comes BY fOLLOwiNG the proof of LeMma B.21 of [@He/SonG:18:wP] aNd applYiNg LEMma \[lemM: q2\]. The SeCOnd Statement foLlowS preciselY as in tHE same waY As Lemma b.22 of [@He/SOng:18:wP]. $\bLackSQuArE$

\[leMm: COnsIStEncY Var EstimatoR\] $\hAt \Sigma_s^2 = \sigMA_s^2 + O_p(1)$, wheRe $\sIgma_s^2$ is as Defined in (\[Var\]).

**PRooF:** We cAN reWrite $$\Begin{AligNeD}
\labeL{tilde Sigma2}
\SiGma_S^2 = \frac{1}{nv^4} \sum_{i_1,i_2 \In N: \oVerline N(i_1) \Cap \OvErlInE N(i_2) \ne \VArnothIng} \MatHbf{E}_\matHscr{F}[q_{i_1,s} Q_{i_2,S}].\EnD{ALIgNed}$$
i,0}| \right) = O_P(\omega _n).\end{a ligne d}$ $ C om bini ng t he results, we obta in the statement of th e lem ma .  $\b l ac ksqua re$

Le t  $ $ \ beg in {a lig ne d }\labe l{W n}
V &\ equiv& \fr ac{ 1} {n}\sum_{i_1 , i_ 2 \in N: \ ove rline N(i_1)  \c ap \ov er lin e  N(i_ 2)\ne \ varnot h ing} \ left(\hat  q _ {i_1,S } \hat q_ { i _2 ,S}- q_{i_1,S} q_{i_ 2 ,S } \right),  \tex t{ and  } \ \\ n ota g
W  &\equiv&\f rac{1 } {n}\sum _ {i _ 1 , i_2 \in N: \overl ine N(i_1)\ cap  \over li neN (i_2)\ne \ va r not hing}(q_{i_ 1,S}  q_{i_2,S } - \m a thbf{E} _ \mathsc r{F}[q_{ i_1 ,S}q _{ i_ 2,S }] ) .\e n d{ ali g ned }$$

\[l em m:  W\]$$\b e g i n {ali gne d}
      V = o_P(1),  \t ext{ and  } W= o_P (1). 
   \e nd{ali gned} $$ 

**Proof:** Th e fi rst state men timm ed iatel y  comes  by  fo llowing  the pr o ofof L e mm a B.21 of [@He/Son g: 1 8 :W P] and a pplyin g  L em m a \[lemm :q2\ ]. T h e  seco nd s t at ement fo llowsp re ci sely as  i n thesa meway  as L e mmaB.22 o f [@He/S ong:1 8 :WP]. $\blacks q uare$

\[lemm :  c o n si s tenc y v ar estimato r\]$ \hat  \si g ma _S^ 2  = \s igma_ S^ 2  + o_P(1)$, where $\si gm a_S^2$  is a s defined in(\[Var\]). * *Proof:* * We ca n  rewrite $$\be gin{a ligned}
\l a bel{tild e sig ma2}
\si gma_S^2 = \ frac{1}{ nv^ 4}\su m_{ i _ 1, i_2 \in N: \o v e rlin eN(i_1)\ca p \over lin e N (i_ 2)\n e \varnot hing} \m at hb f{ E} _\m athsc r {F}[q_{i _1 ,S}  q _{i _2,S} ] .\end{ align ed}$ $
i,0}| \right)_= O_P(\omega_n).\end{aligned}$$_Combining the results, we_obtain the_statement_of the_lemma._$\blacksquare$

Let $$\begin{aligned}
\label{Wn}
V &\equiv&_\frac{1}{n}\sum_{i_1,i_2 \in N:_\overline N(i_1) \cap \overline_N(i_2) \ne \varnothing}_\left(\hat_q_{i_1,S}\hat q_{i_2,S} - q_{i_1,S} q_{i_2,S}\right),  \text{ and }\\ \notag
W &\equiv& \frac{1}{n}\sum_{i_1,i_2 \in N:_\overline_N(i_1) \cap_\overline_N(i_2)_\ne \varnothing}(q_{i_1,S} q_{i_2,S} - \mathbf{E}_\mathscr{F}[_q_{i_1,S} q_{i_2,S}]).\end{aligned}$$

\[lemm: W\] $$\begin{aligned}
 _ _    V = o_P(1), \text{_and_} W =_o_P(1).
    \end{aligned}$$

**Proof:** The first statement immediately_comes by following the proof of_Lemma B.21 of_[@He/Song:18:WP]_and_applying Lemma \[lemm: q2\]._The second statement follows precisely as_in the same way as Lemma_B.22 of [@He/Song:18:WP]. $\blacksquare$

\[lemm: consistency var estimator\]_$\hat \sigma_S^2 = \sigma_S^2 + o_P(1)$,_where $\sigma_S^2$ is as defined_in (\[Var\]).

**Proof:**_We can rewrite $$\begin{aligned}
\label{tilde sigma2}
\sigma_S^2_= \frac{1}{nv^4} \sum_{i_1,i_2_\in N:_\overline N(i_1) \cap_\overline N(i_2) \ne \varnothing} \mathbf{E}_\mathscr{F}[q_{i_1,S} q_{i_2,S}].\end{aligned}$$