mbox{M\"ob}_{d} 
\ = \ \frac{1}{d} \Bigl( \ f \ { \widetilde{{ \framebox[7pt]{$\star$} }} }\ G_{d} \ { \widetilde{{ \framebox[7pt]{$\star$} }} }\ 
( d \mbox{M\"ob}_{d} \circ D_{1/d}) \ \Bigr)
\ \ \mbox{ (by Eqn.(1.23) )}$$ $$= \ \frac{1}{d} ( f \ { \widetilde{{ \framebox[7pt]{$\star$} }} }\ H_{d} )
\ \ \mbox{ (by the definition of $H_{d}$ in Section 1.7).}$$ So we obtain the equation: $$R_{A_{1}P_{1}, \ldots, A_{r}P_{i}, \ldots, A_{s}P_{d}} \ = \ 
\frac{1}{d} ( f \ { \widetilde{{ \framebox[7pt]{$\star$} }} }\ H_{d} ),$$ out of which (2.7) is obtained in the same way as (2.6) was obtained from (2.15). [**QED**]{}

$\ $

[**2.12 Remark.**]{} The proof of Theorem 2.10 obtains the Equations (2.15) and (2.16), stronger than what was originally stated, and which show better the significance of the series $f \ { \widetilde{{ \framebox[7pt]{$\star$} }} }\ G_{d}$ and $f \ { \widetilde{{ \framebox[7pt]{$\star$} }} }\ H_{d}$.

$\ $

$\ $

$\ $

We will concentrate on applications to a family $A_{1}, \ldots, A_{s}$ of selfadjoint $d \times d$ matrices over a $*$-probability space ${ ( {\cal A}, \varphi ) }$. By keeping in mind the motivating example from [@V2], it is of particular interest to put into evidence situations where the family $A_{1}, \ldots, A_{s}$ is free in $(M_{d} ( { {\cal A} }), \varphi_{d} )$, and where the individual R-transform of each of $A_{1}, \ldots, A_{s
mbox{M\"ob}_{d } 
 \ = \ \frac{1}{d } \Bigl (\ f \ { \widetilde { { \framebox[7pt]{$\star$ } } } } \ G_{d } \ { \widetilde { { \framebox[7pt]{$\star$ } } } } \ 
 (d \mbox{M\"ob}_{d } \circ D_{1 / d }) \ \Bigr) 
 \ \ \mbox { (by Eqn.(1.23) ) } $ $ $ $ = \ \frac{1}{d } (f \ { \widetilde { { \framebox[7pt]{$\star$ } } } } \ H_{d }) 
 \ \ \mbox { (by the definition of $ H_{d}$ in Section 1.7).}$$ So we obtain the equation: $ $ R_{A_{1}P_{1 }, \ldots, A_{r}P_{i }, \ldots, A_{s}P_{d } } \ = \ 
 \frac{1}{d } (f \ { \widetilde { { \framebox[7pt]{$\star$ } } } } \ H_{d }), $ $ out of which (2.7) is prevail in the like way as (2.6) was obtained from (2.15). [ * * QED * * ] { } 

 $ \ $ 

 [ * * 2.12 Remark. * * ] { } The validation of Theorem 2.10 obtains the Equations (2.15) and (2.16), hard than what was originally stated, and which indicate better the significance of the serial $ f \ { \widetilde { { \framebox[7pt]{$\star$ } } } } \ G_{d}$ and $ f \ { \widetilde { { \framebox[7pt]{$\star$ } } } } \ H_{d}$. 

 $ \ $ 

 $ \ $ 

 $ \ $ 

 We will condense on applications to a syndicate $ A_{1 }, \ldots, A_{s}$ of selfadjoint $ d \times d$ matrices over a $ * $ -probability quad $ { ({ \cal A }, \varphi) } $. By keeping in mind the motivating example from [ @V2 ], it is of particular sake to put into evidence situations where the family $ A_{1 }, \ldots, A_{s}$ is barren in $ (M_{d } ({ { \cal A } }), \varphi_{d }) $, and where the individual R - transform of each of $ A_{1 }, \ldots, A_{s
mbod{M\"ob}_{d} 
\ = \ \frac{1}{d} \Bigl( \ f \ { \widetilde{{ \framgbix[7pt]{$\ster$} }} }\ G_{d} \ { \widetklde{{ \framebox[7pt]{$\star$} }} }\ 
( d \mboe{M\"ob}_{e} \cirx D_{1/d}) \ \Bigr)
\ \ \mbox{ (by Eqv.(1.23) )}$$ $$= \ \frac{1}{f} ( f \ { \wudetmlde{{ \framebox[7pt]{$\svzr$} }} }\ H_{d} )
\ \ \mbos{ (by chx definition of $H_{d}$ in Secdion 1.7).}$$ So we obdakn the equation: $$R_{A_{1}P_{1}, \ldots, A_{r}P_{i}, \ldots, W_{s}P_{d}} \ = \ 
\fgac{1}{d} ( f \ { \widejilde{{ \sramsbox[7pt]{$\star$} }} }\ H_{d} ),$$ out of which (2.7) is kbtainev in the same wsy as (2.6) was obtained from (2.15). [**EED**]{}

$\ $

[**2.12 Remark.**]{} The proof lf Theorem 2.10 obtwuns the Equagions (2.15) and (2.16), stronger tgan what was originally stated, xnd wkich show bgcrer jhe significence os the series $f \ { \widatilde{{ \gramebox[7pt]{$\star$} }} }\ J_{d}$ abd $f \ { \widetilde{{ \framxbox[7pt]{$\star$} }} }\ H_{d}$.

$\ $

$\ $

$\ $

We will conweutrate on applicationw ro a xaminy $A_{1}, \odogs, Z_{s}$ or selfwdjkint $d \timss d$ matricws over a $*$-probabiliuy fisce ${ ( {\cal A}, \barphi ) }$. By keeping in mind the motivating examkle fdom [@V2], it is of particulqr interest to put injo evidencq situations where the family $A_{1}, \ldots, A_{s}$ is free hn $(M_{d} ( { {\cco A} }), \xqrohi_{d} )$, and where the individual R-transform of qzcn pf $A_{1}, \ldots, A_{s
mbox{M\"ob}_{d} \ = \ \frac{1}{d} \Bigl( \ { \framebox[7pt]{$\star$} }} G_{d} \ { d \circ D_{1/d}) \ \ \ \mbox{ Eqn.(1.23) )}$$ $$= \ \frac{1}{d} ( \ { \widetilde{{ \framebox[7pt]{$\star$} }} }\ H_{d} ) \ \ \mbox{ (by the of $H_{d}$ in Section 1.7).}$$ So we obtain the equation: $$R_{A_{1}P_{1}, \ldots, A_{r}P_{i}, A_{s}P_{d}} = \frac{1}{d} f \ { \widetilde{{ \framebox[7pt]{$\star$} }} }\ H_{d} ),$$ out of which (2.7) is obtained in same way as (2.6) was obtained from (2.15). $\ $ [**2.12 Remark.**]{} proof of Theorem 2.10 obtains Equations and (2.16), than was stated, and which better the significance of the series $f \ { \widetilde{{ \framebox[7pt]{$\star$} }} }\ G_{d}$ and $f \ \widetilde{{ \framebox[7pt]{$\star$} H_{d}$. $\ $\ $\ We will concentrate to a family $A_{1}, \ldots, A_{s}$ \times d$ matrices over a $*$-probability space ${ {\cal A}, ) }$. By keeping in mind motivating example from [@V2], it is of particular to put into evidence situations where the family $A_{1}, \ldots, A_{s}$ is free in $(M_{d} {\cal A} }), \varphi_{d} and where the R-transform each $A_{1}, A_{s
mbox{M\"ob}_{d} 
\ = \ \frac{1}{d} \Bigl( \ f \ { \widetilDe{{ \framebox[7Pt]{$\staR$} }} }\ G_{d} \ { \WidEtIlde{{ \FramEbox[7pt]{$\star$} }} }\ 
( d \mboX{m\"ob}_{d} \Circ D_{1/d}) \ \Bigr)
\ \ \mbox{ (by Eqn.(1.23) )}$$ $$= \ \fraC{1}{d} ( f \ { \wiDeTIlde{{ \FRaMebox[7Pt]{$\star$} }} }\ H_{D} )
\ \ \MbOX{ (By tHe DeFinItIOn Of $H_{d}$ iN SeCtion 1.7).}$$ So We obtain thE eqUaTion: $$R_{A_{1}P_{1}, \ldots, a_{R}P_{I}, \ldots, A_{s}P_{d}} \ = \ 
\FraC{1}{d} ( f \ { \widetilde{{ \FraMebox[7pT]{$\sTar$} }} }\ h_{D} ),$$ out oF whIch (2.7) is ObtainED in the Same way as (2.6) WaS ObtainED from (2.15). [**QEd**]{}

$\ $

[**2.12 rEmArk.**]{} THe proof of Theorem 2.10 oBTaINs the Equations (2.15) And (2.16), strOnGEr THAn wHat Was originaLlY statED, and whiCH sHOW BetTEr the significAnce of the seRIes $F \ { \widetIlDe{{ \fRAmebox[7Pt]{$\staR$} }} }\ G_{D}$ And $F \ { \widetilde{{ \fRameBox[7pt]{$\star$} }} }\ h_{d}$.

$\ $

$\ $

$\ $

We wiLL concenTRate on aPplicaTioNs tO a faMIlY $A_{1}, \LdoTs, a_{S}$ of SElFadJOinT $d \times d$ MaTrIces oVer a $*$-PROBAbilIty SpacE ${ ( {\cal A}, \Varphi ) }$. By keepiNg iN minD The MotivAting ExamPlE from [@v2], it is oF partIcUlar interest to pUt inTo evidencE siTuAtiOnS wherE The famIly $a_{1}, \ldOts, A_{s}$ is Free in $(M_{D} ( { {\Cal a} }), \vARPHi_{D} )$, and where the indiviDuAL r-tRansform Of each OF $A_{1}, \LdOTs, A_{s
mbox{M\"ob}_{d} 
\ = \ \fr ac{1}{d} \ Bigl(  \f \  {  \wi deti lde{{ \framebo x [7pt ]{$\star$} }} }\ G_{d}  \ {\w i deti l de {{ \f ramebox [ 7p t ] {$\ st ar $}}} }\  
( d  \m box{M\" ob}_{d} \c irc  D _{1/d}) \ \B i gr )
\ \ \mbo x{(by Eqn.(1.2 3))}$$ $ $=  \\ frac{ 1}{ d} (f \ {\ wideti lde{{ \fr am e box[7p t ]{$\sta r $ }}} } \ H_{d} )
\ \ \mb o x{ (by the defini tion o f$ H_ { d }$inSection 1. 7) .}$$S o we ob t ai n t hee quation: $$R_ {A_{1}P_{1} ,  \l dots,A_ {r} P _{i},\ldot s, A_{ s}P_{d}} \= \
\frac{1} {d} (f  \ { \w i detilde {{ \fr ame box [7pt ] {$ \s tar $} }}} \H_{ d } ) ,$$ outof  w hich(2.7 ) i s  obt ain ed i n the  same way as(2. 6) w a s o btain ed fr om ( 2. 15).[**QED **]{} 
$\ $

[**2.12 R emar k.**]{} T hepr oof  o f The o rem 2. 10obt ains th e Equat i ons  ( 2 . 1 5)  and (2.16), stron ge r th an whatwas or i gi na l ly state d,  an d wh i c h sho w be t te r the si gnific a nc eof these ries $ f\ {  \w ideti l de{{  \fram ebox[7pt ]{$\s t ar$} }} }\ G_{ d }$ and $f \ { \w i d et i lde{ { \ framebox[7p t]{$ \ star $} } }  } \ H _ {d}$. 

$\$$\ $

$\ $

We will co nc entrat e onapplicationsto a famil y $ A_{1}, \ ldot s ,A _{s}$ of selfa djoin t $d \time s  d$ matr icesover a $ *$-probab i l ity spac e $ { (  {\ cal A },  \varphi ) }$ . By k ee ping in  mi nd themot iva tin g e xa mple from  [@V2],it  i sof  pa rticu l ar inter es t t oput  into eviden ce si tuat io ns whe re thef am i l y $A _{ 1} , \l dot s,  A_{s }$ i s  fr ee in $ (M_{d} ({ { \ calA}  } ), \var phi_{d} )$, a nd  where the  i ndi vidual R -transfo rm of each of $A_{1}, \ l dots, A _{s 
mbox{M\"ob}_{d} 
\_= \_\frac{1}{d} \Bigl( \ f_\ {_\widetilde{{_\framebox[7pt]{$\star$} }}_}\_G_{d} \ {_\widetilde{{ \framebox[7pt]{$\star$} }}_}\ 
( d \mbox{M\"ob}_{d}_\circ D_{1/d}) \_\Bigr)
\_\ \mbox{ (by Eqn.(1.23) )}$$ $$= \ \frac{1}{d} ( f \ { \widetilde{{ \framebox[7pt]{$\star$}_}}_}\ H_{d}_)
\_\_\mbox{ (by the definition of_$H_{d}$ in Section 1.7).}$$ So_we obtain_the equation: $$R_{A_{1}P_{1}, \ldots, A_{r}P_{i}, \ldots, A_{s}P_{d}} \_=_\ 
\frac{1}{d} (_f \ { \widetilde{{ \framebox[7pt]{$\star$} }} }\ H_{d} ),$$_out of which (2.7) is obtained_in the same_way_as_(2.6) was obtained from_(2.15). [**QED**]{}

$\ $

[**2.12 Remark.**]{} The proof_of Theorem 2.10 obtains the Equations_(2.15) and (2.16), stronger than what was_originally stated, and which show better_the significance of the series_$f \_{ \widetilde{{ \framebox[7pt]{$\star$} }} }\_G_{d}$ and $f_\ {_\widetilde{{ \framebox[7pt]{$\star$} }}_}\ H_{d}$.

$\ $

$\ $

$\ $

We will_concentrate on applications_to a family $A_{1}, \ldots, A_{s}$_of_selfadjoint $d \times_d$_matrices_over a_$*$-probability space ${_(_{\cal A},_\varphi_) }$. By keeping in mind_the_motivating example from [@V2], it is of_particular interest to put_into_evidence situations where the_family $A_{1}, \ldots, A_{s}$ is_free in $(M_{d} ( { {\cal_A} }),_\varphi_{d} )$,_and where the individual R-transform of each of $A_{1}, \ldots, A_{s