 the analytic estimates for higher temperatures. Here one can also see, that $\eta$ stays more or less the same for both species at lower temperature and starts to diverge the more particles are created in the box in the Hagedorn case. The values explode, if the particle number density increases ad infinitum near $T_H$. Nevertheless, it increases less rapidly than the entropy density as shown in \[fig:s\_T3\].

It is interesting to observe, that the competing differences in the intermediate result of $C(0)$ and $\tau$ cancel each other at low temperatures and only for $T\gtrsim 140{{\ensuremath{\,{\rm MeV}}\xspace}}$, a different behavior between the pion gas and the Hagedorn state gas my be observable.

Combining both the results of the thermodynamical quantities (the entropy density), and the shear viscosity, \[fig:eta\_s\] shows the final result, the shear viscosity to entropy density ratio.

![The final result is $\eta$ normalized to the entropy density for numerical and analytical estimates. Error bars are as in \[fig:eta\]. The KSS bound $1/4\pi$ is indicated. The Hagedorn extrapolation $M\to\infty$ contains both separate $\eta$ and $s$ extrapolations. []{data-label="fig:eta_s"}](eta_sloglog.eps){width="\columnwidth"}

As expected, at low temperatures the results for the pion gas and the Hagedorn gas coincide. Since the entropy density $s$ very rapidly starts to diverge with increasing temperature, also the fraction $\eta/s$ diverges. Finally, all the calculated results via the Monte Carlo/Green Kubo approach a stop at values above the KSS bound of $1/4\pi$. The analytic estimates indicate, that the results drop below this boundary and go to zero when temperature increases further.

Using the statistical error for $\tau$, one can compute the errors for $\eta$ and $\eta/s$. In \[fig:eta\] and \[fig:eta\_s\] one observes, that the numerical results including the errorbars do not match the analytical curve.

This leads us to the finding, that there are some systematic error in the Green-Kubo formalism, which are underestimated in the current work.

Conclusions {#sec:Conclusions}
===========

In the present work, the transport coefficient $\eta/s$
the analytic estimates for higher temperatures. Here one can also visualize, that $ \eta$ quell more or less the same for both species at lower temperature and begin to diverge the more particles are create in the corner in the Hagedorn case. The values explode, if the particle number concentration increases ad infinitum near $ T_H$. Nevertheless, it increases less rapidly than the information density as shown in \[fig: s\_T3\ ]. 

 It is interesting to observe, that the competing differences in the average result of $ C(0)$ and $ \tau$ cancel each other at humble temperatures and only for $ T\gtrsim 140{{\ensuremath{\,{\rm MeV}}\xspace}}$, a unlike behavior between the pion flatulence and the Hagedorn state natural gas my be observable. 

 Combining both the results of the thermodynamic quantities (the entropy density), and the shear viscosity, \[fig: eta\_s\ ] shows the final result, the shear viscosity to entropy density proportion. 

! [ The concluding consequence is $ \eta$ normalized to the entropy density for numerical and analytical estimates. mistake bar are as in \[fig: eta\ ]. The KSS bound $ 1/4\pi$ is indicated. The Hagedorn extrapolation $ M\to\infty$ control both disjoined $ \eta$ and $ s$ extrapolations. [ ] { data - label="fig: eta_s"}](eta_sloglog.eps){width="\columnwidth " } 

 As ask, at abject temperatures the results for the pion accelerator and the Hagedorn gas coincide. Since the entropy density $ s$ very rapidly starts to diverge with increasing temperature, also the fraction $ \eta / s$ diverges. Finally, all the calculated results via the Monte Carlo / Green Kubo border on a stop at value above the KSS bound of $ 1/4\pi$. The analytic estimates indicate, that the results drop below this limit and go to zero when temperature increases further. 

 Using the statistical error for $ \tau$, one can compute the errors for $ \eta$ and $ \eta / s$. In \[fig: eta\ ] and \[fig: eta\_s\ ] one observes, that the numerical resultant role including the errorbars do not meet the analytical curve. 

 This contribute us to the finding, that there embody some systematic mistake in the Green - Kubo formalism, which are underestimated in the current oeuvre. 

 Conclusions { # sec: Conclusions } 
 = = = = = = = = = = = 

 In the present work, the transport coefficient $ \eta / s$
 thf analytic estimates for higher temperajuees. Hece one dan also see, that $\eta$ stays more or pews tht same for both spezies at llwer temperauure and starts to divergc the lore 'articles are cteated in tha box in the Hdgddlrn case. The values explode, if the [articlr jumber density incgewses ad infinitum near $T_H$. Nevertheless, it incgeases less rapidky than the entropy densitj as shown in \[fig:s\_T3\].

It ls interestung ei observe, thxt the comkecing differgnces in the intermediate result of $C(0)$ and $\tau$ cqnxel gach other av low nemperatures and only for $T\gyrsim 140{{\ensuremabh{\,{\rm KeV}}\zspace}}$, a different beiavior between the pyon gas atd the Hagedorn stare gas ky ba obrwrvxblt.

Cokbjning hoti the resulfs of the tyermodynamical quanuityvx (the entropg densytr), and the shear viscosity, \[fig:eta\_s\] shows ths final result, the sheae viscosity to entropi density watio.

![The final result is $\eta$ normalized to the endropy aenwiby fue jumerical and analytical estimates. Error bars zrt ax in \[fig:eta\]. Thc KSS bound $1/4\pi$ is onfivwted. The Hageaorn erfrzpolation $M\to\infty$ contaigs borh separaue $\ets$ and $s$ extrapolations. []{data-oabel="fig:eta_s"}](vta_sooglog.eps){width="\colulnwidth"}

As erpectec, at kow temperatures the rerulta for the plon gas aha the Hagedorn gxs boinwide. Since the entropy denfity $s$ vecy ra'idly stxrts to diderge with incrcdsing temperature, wlso jhe frdction $\eta/d$ diverges. Finally, all the calcnkated resultx eia the Monce Carko/Green Kubo wpproach a stok at valuzs aboxe the KSS bound mf $1/4\pi$. The agalytic estimdjes indicate, vhat the wesuots erop beuuw this boundaty and go to zero wyen temperature ingreasgs further.

Using tkt suaristical error fof $\twu$, oie cag compute the errurs gor $\ega$ and $\tca/s$. Kn \[fog:eta\] and \[fig:eta\_s\] ona obaerves, that the nukevical resolts incltding the errprbars do not matcj the anelyticsl surve.

This leads us to the findjng, that hheve are some srstenatic error nn the Green-Kubo formalism, which are undxrestimated in the curtent work.

Conclusions {#xtc:Conclusions}
===========

Mn the present fork, the transport ciefficient $\eta/s$
the analytic estimates for higher temperatures. Here also that $\eta$ more or less at temperature and starts diverge the more are created in the box in Hagedorn case. The values explode, if the particle number density increases ad infinitum $T_H$. Nevertheless, it increases less rapidly than the entropy density as shown in It interesting observe, the competing differences in the intermediate result of $C(0)$ and $\tau$ cancel each other at low and only for $T\gtrsim 140{{\ensuremath{\,{\rm MeV}}\xspace}}$, a different between the pion gas the Hagedorn state gas my observable. both the of thermodynamical (the entropy density), the shear viscosity, \[fig:eta\_s\] shows the final result, the shear viscosity to entropy density ratio. ![The final is $\eta$ the entropy for and estimates. Error bars in \[fig:eta\]. The KSS bound $1/4\pi$ Hagedorn extrapolation $M\to\infty$ contains both separate $\eta$ and extrapolations. []{data-label="fig:eta_s"}](eta_sloglog.eps){width="\columnwidth"} expected, at low temperatures the results the pion gas and the Hagedorn gas coincide. the entropy density $s$ very rapidly starts to diverge with increasing temperature, also the fraction Finally, all the calculated via the Monte Kubo a at above the bound of $1/4\pi$. The analytic estimates indicate, that the results drop this boundary and go to zero when temperature increases further. statistical for $\tau$, one compute the errors for and In \[fig:eta\] and \[fig:eta\_s\] that numerical errorbars not the analytical curve. This us to the finding, that are some systematic error are underestimated in the current work. Conclusions {#sec:Conclusions} In the present work, the transport coefficient
 the analytic estimates for hiGher temperAtureS. HeRe oNe Can aLso sEe, that $\eta$ stays MOre oR less the same for both speCies aT lOWer tEMpEratuRe and stARtS TO diVeRgE thE mORe PartiCleS are creAted in the bOx iN tHe Hagedorn caSE. THe values exPloDe, if the partiCle Number DeNsiTY incrEasEs ad iNfinitUM near $T_h$. NevertheLeSS, it incREases leSS RaPidlY than the entropy deNSiTY as shown in \[fig:s\_t3\].

It is iNtEReSTIng To oBserve, that ThE compETing difFErENCEs iN The intermediaTe result of $C(0)$ ANd $\tAu$ cancEl EacH Other aT low tEmPEraTures and onlY for $t\gtrsim 140{{\enSuremaTH{\,{\rm MeV}}\xSPace}}$, a diFferenT beHavIor bETwEeN thE pIOn gAS aNd tHE HaGedorn stAtE gAs my bE obsERVABle.

COmbIninG both The results of tHe tHermODynAmicaL quanTitiEs (The enTropy dEnsitY), aNd the shear viscoSity, \[Fig:eta\_s\] shOws ThE fiNaL resuLT, the shEar VisCosity tO entropY DenSiTY RAtIo.

![The final result is $\EtA$ NOrMalized tO the enTRoPy DEnsity foR nUmeRicaL ANd anaLytiCAl EstimateS. Error BArS aRe as in \[fIg:Eta\]. The kSs boUnd $1/4\Pi$ is iNDicaTed. The hagedorn ExtraPOlation $M\to\inftY$ Contains both sEPaRATe $\ETa$ anD $s$ eXtrapolatioNs. []{daTA-labEl="fiG:EtA_s"}](eTA_slogLog.epS){wIDtH="\Columnwidth"}

As expectEd, At low tEmperAtures the resuLts for the pION Gas and thE HagEDoRN gas coincide. SiNce thE entropy deNSity $s$ verY rapiDly startS to divergE WIth increAsiNg tEmpEraTURe, Also the fractiON $\Eta/s$ DiVerges. FInaLly, all tHe cAlcUlaTed ReSults via tHe Monte CArLo/grEeN KuBo appROach a stoP aT vaLuEs aBove tHE KSS boUnd of $1/4\Pi$. ThE aNaLYtiC estimaTEs INDicaTe, ThAt thE reSuLts drOp beLOw tHis bounDary and go To zERo whEn TeMperatuRe increases fuRtHer.

Using thE sTatIsticaL ERror for $\tAu$, one can compute the errorS For $\eta$ aNd $\eTa/s$. In \[Fig:eTa\] and \[fig:eTa\_s\] One obsErvES, that tHe numeRical ReSulTS IncluDINg The ErRorbars do nOT MatCh the AnAlytIcal curVe.

This leads us to the FIndIng, that there aRe sOme sYSTeMatIC eRRor In THe GREEn-Kubo formalism, Which are unDeREsTimated in tHE cuRrEnt work.

conclusIons {#sEC:ConcluSions}
===========

In thE present wOrK, the TRAnsPort coeffiCient $\eta/S$
 the analytic estimates fo r higher t emper atu res .Here  one  can also see, that  $\eta$ stays more orlessth e  sam e  f or bo th spec i es a t l ow er  te mp e ra tureand  starts  to diverg e t he  more partic l es  are creat edin the box i n t he Hag ed orn case.  Th e val ues ex p lode,if the pa rt i cle nu m ber den s i ty  inc reases ad infinit u mn ear $T_H$. Nev erthel es s ,i t  in cre ases lessra pidly than th e  e n t r opy density as sh own in \[fi g :s\ _T3\]. 
Iti s inte resti ng toobserve, th at t he compet ing di f ference s  in the  inter med iat e re s ul tof$C ( 0)$ an d $ \ tau $ cancel  e ac h oth er a t l o w te mpe ratu res a nd only for $ T\g trsi m  14 0{{\e nsure math {\ ,{\rm  MeV}} \xspa ce }}$, a differen t be havior be twe en  th epiong as and  th e H agedorn  stateg asmy b e  o bservable.

Combin in g bo th the r esults of  t h e thermo dy nam ical q uanti ties (t he entro py den s it y) , and t he  shear  v isc osi ty, \ [ fig: eta\_s \] shows  thef inal result, t h e shear visco s it y to entr opy  density ra tio. 
![T he f i na l r e sultis $\ et a $n ormalized to the en tr opy de nsity  for numerica l and anal y t i cal esti mate s .E rror bars areas in  \[fig:eta \ ]. The K SS bo und $1/4 \pi$ is i n d icated.The  Ha ged orn e xt rapolation $M \ t o\in ft y$ cont ain s bothsep ara te$\e ta $ and $s$  extrapo la ti on s.  [] {data - label="f ig :et a_ s"} ](eta _ sloglo g.eps ){wi dt h= " \co lumnwid t h" } 
Asex pe cted , a tlow t empe r atu res the  resultsfor thepi on  gas an d the Hagedor ngas coinci de . S ince t h e  entropy  density $s$ very rapid l y start s t o div erge  with inc rea sing t emp e rature , also  thefr act i o n $\e t a /s $ d iv erges. Fin a l ly,  allth e ca lculate d results via theM ont e Carlo/Green  Ku bo a p p ro ach as top  a t  va l u es above the KS S bound of  $ 1 /4 \pi$. Thea nal yt ic esti mates i ndica t e, that  the resu lts dropbe lowt h isboundary a nd go to  zero whe n  temp e ra tureinc reases  f urt her.
Using the  stat istica lerrorfor $ \t au$, one  can compute the errors  for $ \eta$  an d $\eta/s $.I n \ [fig:eta\ ] an d \[fig:et a\_ s\]  oneobs e rves,  tha t  t hen umeri calr esults in c lu din g th e errorbars d o  no t mat cht he ana lyti cal curve.

Thisl eads us to the  fin d i ng,  th a t th er e are some sys tem at i c  error i nthe Green-K ubo form al i sm, w hich a re und erestim a t ed in the  cur ren t work.
Con cl u sions { #s ec : Conclu sion s} 
===== ====== 
Int h e present work,the t r a nspor t  co effic ie nt $\et a /s$
 the_analytic estimates_for higher temperatures. Here_one can_also_see, that_$\eta$_stays more or_less the same_for both species at_lower temperature and_starts_to diverge the more particles are created in the box in the Hagedorn case._The_values explode,_if_the_particle number density increases ad_infinitum near $T_H$. Nevertheless, it_increases less_rapidly than the entropy density as shown in_\[fig:s\_T3\].

It_is interesting to_observe, that the competing differences in the intermediate result_of $C(0)$ and $\tau$ cancel each_other at low_temperatures_and_only for $T\gtrsim 140{{\ensuremath{\,{\rm_MeV}}\xspace}}$, a different behavior between the_pion gas and the Hagedorn state_gas my be observable.

Combining both the results_of the thermodynamical quantities (the entropy_density), and the shear viscosity,_\[fig:eta\_s\] shows_the final result, the shear_viscosity to entropy_density ratio.

![The_final result is_$\eta$ normalized to the entropy density_for numerical and_analytical estimates. Error bars are as_in_\[fig:eta\]. The KSS_bound_$1/4\pi$_is indicated._The Hagedorn extrapolation_$M\to\infty$_contains both_separate_$\eta$ and $s$ extrapolations. []{data-label="fig:eta_s"}](eta_sloglog.eps){width="\columnwidth"}

As expected,_at_low temperatures the results for the pion_gas and the Hagedorn_gas_coincide. Since the entropy_density $s$ very rapidly starts_to diverge with increasing temperature, also_the fraction_$\eta/s$ diverges._Finally, all the calculated results via the Monte Carlo/Green Kubo approach_a stop at values above the_KSS bound of $1/4\pi$._The analytic_estimates_indicate, that the_results_drop below_this boundary and go to zero when_temperature increases_further.

Using the statistical error for $\tau$,_one can compute the_errors_for $\eta$ and $\eta/s$. In \[fig:eta\]_and \[fig:eta\_s\] one observes, that the_numerical results including the errorbars_do_not_match the analytical curve.

This leads_us to the finding, that there_are some systematic_error in the Green-Kubo formalism, which are_underestimated_in the current work.

Conclusions {#sec:Conclusions}
===========

In the_present_work, the transport coefficient $\eta/s$