 than 0.04 (Strauss et al. [@strauss]). For closer galaxies, small compact areas inside the galaxies are considered as independent galaxies, so the SDSS photometry and the radius R90 are not representative of the whole galaxy. We therefore excluded from our sample all galaxies with z$<$0.04. (iii) We keep only galaxies with a difference between the fiber and model magnitudes in the r band of less than 1 mag.

One of the main problems with observed spectra is that very few of the associated astrophysical parameters are known. In SDSS only a rough classification is provided. This classification is based on the work of Yip et al. ([@yip]), in which galaxies with eClass$<$-0.1 are considered to be early type galaxies while galaxies with eClass$>$-0.1 are late types. Another criterion used in SDSS for galaxy classification is given by Strateva et al. ([@strateva]). Here, galaxies having a concentration index C smaller than or larger than 2.6 are expected to be late or early type galaxies respectively. The distributions of both indices (C and eClass) show that the SDSS observations cover a wide range of galaxy types. Unfortunately neither of these criteria is particularly accurate, so they can be used only for a rough classification of our sample. It can also be seen in figure \[f2\] that these two criteria are also not in particularly good agreement.

For the final sample we apply additional criteria to exclude observations with large errors, having selected galaxies small enough to ensure that the spectrum comes from most of the projected area of the galaxy. More specifically, we only retained galaxies which had uncertainties in the fiber and model magnitudes in the r band less than 0.01 mag, and had an uncertainty in the concentration index C less than 0.15. The final sample contains 33670 spectra of galaxies covering the whole range of redshifts and galaxy types present in the SDSS sample.

The extension of the observed spectra of galaxies
-------------------------------------------------

The extension of the observed SDSS spectra to Gaia wavelengths was made by using the 28885 synthetic spectra of the second library produced at a random grid of parameters (Tsalmantza et al. [@tsalmantza2]). In order to find the synthetic spectrum that is in best agreement with each observed spectrum, we first had to make the two libraries compatible. The main differences between them are the effects of foreground reddening, noise and redshift, which are present in the SDSS spectra but absent in the synthetic
than 0.04 (Strauss et al. [ @strauss ]). For closer galaxies, small compact area inside the galaxy are considered as independent galaxies, so the SDSS photometry and the spoke R90 are not representative of the whole galaxy. We therefore eject from our sample all galaxies with z$<$0.04. (iii) We keep open only galaxies with a remainder between the fiber and model magnitude in the r band of less than 1 mag. 

 One of the main problems with observed spectrum is that very few of the associated astrophysical parameters are known. In SDSS only a grating classification is provided. This classification is based on the employment of Yip et al. ([ @yip ]), in which galaxies with eClass$<$-0.1 are considered to be early type galaxies while galaxies with eClass$>$-0.1 are belated types. Another criterion used in SDSS for galaxy classification is given by Strateva et al. ([ @strateva ]). Here, galaxies having a concentration index C smaller than or larger than 2.6 are expected to be late or early type galaxies respectively. The distribution of both indices (C and eClass) usher that the SDSS observations cover a wide range of galax types. Unfortunately neither of these standard is particularly accurate, so they can be used merely for a rough classification of our sample. It can also be seen in figure \[f2\ ] that these two criterion are also not in particularly good agreement. 

 For the final sample distribution we apply extra criteria to exclude observations with large errors, having choose galaxies small enough to ensure that the spectrum comes from most of the projected area of the galaxy. More specifically, we only retained galax which had uncertainties in the roughage and model magnitude in the r set less than 0.01 mag, and had an doubt in the concentration index C less than 0.15. The concluding sample contains 33670 spectra of galaxies covering the whole range of redshifts and galaxy types present in the SDSS sample. 

 The extension of the ascertained spectra of galaxies 
 ------------------------------------------------- 

 The propagation of the observed SDSS spectra to Gaia wavelengths was made by using the 28885 synthetic spectra of the second library produce at a random grid of parameters (Tsalmantza et al. [ @tsalmantza2 ]). In order to find the synthetic spectrum that is in best agreement with each observed spectrum, we foremost had to make the two libraries compatible. The main differences between them are the effects of foreground reddening, noise and red shift, which are present in the SDSS spectra but absent in the synthetic
 thwn 0.04 (Strauss et al. [@strausr]). For closer galaxies, vmall dompact xreas inside the galaxies arx cobsideeed as independent galxxies, so nhe SDSS photinetry and vge radimf R90 zve noc cepresentative pf the whone galaxy. We tvefeyore excluded from our sample all gajaxies eihh z$<$0.04. (iii) We kegp onkr gamaxies with a difference between tge fibeg and model magniyudes in the r band of lesd thwn 1 mag.

One of the lain problens wyrh observed rpectra is that very fgw of the associated astrophysicxl paxameters arg inlfn. In SDSS inly w rough classificatimn is ptovided. This ckasvifucation is based on tie work of Yip et al. ([@yip]), in wvieh galaxies with eClaws$<$-0.1 are wonshderde tu bt eerlg type gamaxies whime galaxies with eClass$>$-0.1 are laue ejles. Another driteryog used in SDSS for galaxy classificatiot ia given by Strateva et ql. ([@strateva]). Here, galadies havigg a concentration index C smaller than or larger than 2.6 art cwpecgwd to be late or early type galaxies respectivejg. Uhe distributions of both incifex (C and eClass) show cgaf the SDSS observahions cjver q wide ragge pf galaxy types. Unfortunateoy neither oy tyese criteria is pcrticularly cccuraje, so yhey can be used only fur a rough clasdificatioh of our sample. Ig csn also be seen in figure \[f2\] ehat thesx two criterka ate also not in pagticularly good agreemenh.

For jhe fital sample we apply additional criteria to exclude obsetvadiots with jarge errors, havind selected galcxies smcll enuugh to enaure thet the spectwum comes frok most of the projectqd aeea if the exlaxy. More spevifically, we only rwtained galaxies wmich fzd uncertaintiew ib the fiber and moael mwgiitudqv in the r bdnd uesr than 0.01 mag, and hcd an incertainty in the cmncehtration index C lrsf than 0.15. Jhe final sample contaons 33670 spectra of gapaxiev cuverimg jhe whole range of redshifts ans galaxy hypcs present in the SDSS sample.

Che extension of the observed spectra of galaxies
-------------------------------------------------

The extenwion of the observeb XDSS spectre to Gwia wavelangths was made by uwing the 28885 synthetlc spectra of the secohd libsary oroduced at a random grid of parameters (Tsalmantza et al. [@tsalmantza2]). In oreer to find the syhtheyic sieccruk that is mn best agreement eith each observed spectrum, we hirst had do make the two libraries compstkble. The main differences between thej are thr effects of foreground reddenimg, noise and redshift, whlch are peesenf in the SVSS spectra but absemt in che sybthetic
than 0.04 (Strauss et al. [@strauss]). For small areas inside galaxies are considered SDSS and the radius are not representative the whole galaxy. We therefore excluded our sample all galaxies with z$<$0.04. (iii) We keep only galaxies with a between the fiber and model magnitudes in the r band of less than mag. of main with observed spectra is that very few of the associated astrophysical parameters are known. In SDSS a rough classification is provided. This classification is on the work of et al. ([@yip]), in which with are considered be type while galaxies with are late types. Another criterion used in SDSS for galaxy classification is given by Strateva et al. Here, galaxies concentration index smaller or than 2.6 are be late or early type galaxies of both indices (C and eClass) show that SDSS observations a wide range of galaxy types. neither of these criteria is particularly accurate, so can be used only for a rough classification of our sample. It can also be figure \[f2\] that these criteria are also in good For final sample apply additional criteria to exclude observations with large errors, having selected small enough to ensure that the spectrum comes from most projected of the galaxy. specifically, we only retained which uncertainties in the fiber magnitudes the than mag, had an uncertainty in concentration index C less than The final sample contains the whole range of redshifts and galaxy types in the SDSS sample. The extension of observed spectra of galaxies ------------------------------------------------- The extension of the observed SDSS spectra Gaia wavelengths by using the 28885 synthetic spectra of the library produced at a grid of parameters (Tsalmantza et al. [@tsalmantza2]). In order find synthetic spectrum is in best with each observed we first had the two compatible. main are the effects of foreground reddening, and which are present in the spectra in the synthetic
 than 0.04 (Strauss et al. [@strauss]). For Closer galaXies, sMalL coMpAct aReas Inside the galaxIEs arE considered as independeNt galAxIEs, so THe sDSS pHotometRY aND The RaDiUs R90 ArE NoT reprEseNtative Of the whole GalAxY. We therefore EXcLuded from oUr sAmple all galaXieS with z$<$0.04. (IiI) We KEep onLy gAlaxiEs with A DifferEnce betweEn THe fibeR And modeL MAgNituDes in the r band of leSS tHAn 1 mag.

One of the mAin proBlEMs WITh oBseRved spectrA iS that VEry few oF ThE ASSocIAted astrophysIcal parametERs aRe knowN. IN SDss only a Rough ClASsiFication is pRoviDed. This clAssifiCAtion is BAsed on tHe work Of YIp eT al. ([@yIP]), iN wHicH gALaxIEs WitH EClAss$<$-0.1 are coNsIdEred tO be eARLY Type GalAxieS whilE galaxies with EClAss$>$-0.1 aRE laTe typEs. AnoTher CrIteriOn used In SDSs fOr galaxy classifIcatIon is giveN by stRatEvA et al. ([@STratevA]). HeRe, gAlaxies Having a COncEnTRATiOn index C smaller thaN oR LArGer than 2.6 aRe expeCTeD tO Be late or EaRly Type GALaxieS resPEcTively. ThE distrIBuTiOns of boTh IndiceS (C And EClAss) shOW thaT the SDsS observAtionS Cover a wide rangE Of galaxy types. uNfORTuNAtelY neIther of thesE criTEria Is paRTiCulARly acCuratE, sO ThEY can be used only for a rOuGh clasSificAtion of our samPle. It can alSO BE seen in fIgurE \[F2\] tHAt these two critEria aRe also not iN ParticulArly gOod agreeMent.

For thE FInal sampLe wE apPly AddITIoNal criteria to EXCludE oBservatIonS with laRge ErrOrs, HavInG selected Galaxies SmAlL eNoUgh To ensURe that thE sPecTrUm cOmes fROm most Of the ProjEcTeD AreA of the gALaXY. more SpEcIficAllY, wE only RetaINed GalaxieS which had UncERtaiNtIeS in the fIber and model mAgNitudes in tHe R baNd less THAn 0.01 mag, and Had an uncertainty in the coNCentratIon Index c lesS than 0.15. The fInaL samplE coNTains 33670 sPectra Of galAxIes COVerinG THe WhoLe Range of redSHIftS and gAlAxy tYpes preSent in the SDSS samplE.

the Extension of thE obServED SpEctRA oF GalAxIEs
-------------------------------------------------

THE Extension of the oBserved SDSs sPEcTra to Gaia wAVelEnGths was Made by uSing tHE 28885 syntheTic spectrA of the secOnD libRARy pRoduced at a Random grId of paramETers (TSAlMantzA et Al. [@tsalMaNtzA2]). In orDer to fINd tHe synThetic SpEctrum That iS iN best agrEement with each observed sPectruM, we fiRst Had to make The TWo lIbraries cOmpaTible. The maIn dIffErencEs bETween Them ARe The EFfectS of fOReground rEDdEniNG, NoIse and redshIFT, WhiCh are PreSEnt in tHe SDsS spectra but absenT In the synthetic
 than 0.04 (Strauss et al.  [@strauss ]). F orclo se r ga laxi es, small comp a ct a reas inside the galaxi es ar ec onsi d er ed as  indepe n de n t  ga la xi es,  s o  t he SD SSphotome try and th e r ad ius R90 aren ot  represent ati ve of the wh ole  galax y.  We there for e exc ludedf rom ou r sampleal l  galax i es with z $< $0.0 4. (iii) We keepo nl y  galaxies with  a dif fe r en c e  be twe en the fib er  andm odel ma g ni t u d esi n the r bandof less tha n  1mag.
On e o f  the m ain p ro b lem s with obse rved  spectrais tha t  very f e w of th e asso cia ted  ast r op hy sic al par a me ter s  ar e known.  I nSDSSonly a r ough  cl assi ficat ion is provid ed.  Thi s  cl assif icati on i sbased  on th e wor kof Yip et al. ( [@yi p]), in w hic hgal ax ies w i th eCl ass $<$ -0.1 ar e consi d ere dt o be  early type galaxi es w hi le galax ies wi t heC l ass$>$-0 .1  ar e la t e  type s. A n ot her crit erionu se din SDSS  f or gal ax y c las sific a tion  is gi ven by S trate v a et al. ([@st r ateva]). Here ,  g a l ax i es h avi ng a concen trat i on i ndex Csma l ler t han o rl ar g er than 2.6 are exp ec ted to  be l ate or earlytype galax i e s  respect ivel y .T he distributio ns of  both indi c es (C an d eCl ass) sho w that th e SDSS obs erv ati ons  co v e ra wide rangeo f  gal ax y types . U nfortun ate lynei the rof thesecriteria  i spa rt icu larly accurate ,soth eycan b e  usedonlyforaro u ghclassif i ca t i on o fou r sa mpl e.  It c an a l sobe seen  in figur e \ [ f2\]  t ha t these  two criteria  a re also no tinpartic u l arly goo d agreement.

For the f i nal sam ple  we a pply  addition alcriter iat o excl ude ob serva ti ons w ith l a r ge  er ro rs, having s ele ctedga laxi es smal l enough to ensure tha t the spectru m c omes f ro m m o st ofth e  pr o j ected area of t he galaxy.  M o re  specifica l ly,  w e onlyretaine d gal a xies wh ich had u ncertaint ie s in t hefiber andmodel ma gnitudesi n the rbandles s than  0 .01  mag,  and h a d a n unc ertain ty  in th e con ce ntration  index C less than 0.15 . Thefinal  sa mple cont ain s  33 670 spect ra o f galaxies  co ver ing t hew holerang e  o f r e dshif ts a n d galaxyt yp esp r es ent in theS D S S s ample .
T he ext ensi on of the observe d  spectra of ga laxi e s 
-- --- - ---- -- -------------- --- -- - - -------- -- ------

The  extensi on of th e obse rved S DSS spe c t ra to Gai a wa vel engths wa s m ad e  by usi ng  t h e 2888 5 sy nt heticspectr a  oft h e second library  prod u c ed at a r andom  g rid ofp aram eters (Tsa lmantza etal. [@ tsal mantz a2]). I nordertofi nd the syn t hetic spe ctrum  that i sin b est  agree ment w ith e achob ser ved spect r u m, we  f i rst  had  to m ak e th e two lib r aries co mpa t ible. T he  ma i n  diffe r en c e s betweenthe m are t he effects of f o re g round  redde ning,noise a n d r ed shift,whi c h  are pres ent in th e  SD SS  spe ctra but  a bsen tinth e synthetic
 than_0.04 (Strauss_et al. [@strauss]). For_closer galaxies,_small_compact areas_inside_the galaxies are_considered as independent_galaxies, so the SDSS_photometry and the_radius_R90 are not representative of the whole galaxy. We therefore excluded from our sample_all_galaxies with_z$<$0.04._(iii)_We keep only galaxies with_a difference between the fiber_and model_magnitudes in the r band of less than_1_mag.

One of the_main problems with observed spectra is that very few_of the associated astrophysical parameters are_known. In SDSS_only_a_rough classification is provided._This classification is based on the_work of Yip et al. ([@yip]),_in which galaxies with eClass$<$-0.1 are considered_to be early type galaxies while_galaxies with eClass$>$-0.1 are late_types. Another_criterion used in SDSS for_galaxy classification is_given by_Strateva et al._([@strateva]). Here, galaxies having a concentration_index C smaller_than or larger than 2.6 are_expected_to be late_or_early_type galaxies_respectively. The distributions_of_both indices_(C_and eClass) show that the SDSS_observations_cover a wide range of galaxy types._Unfortunately neither of these_criteria_is particularly accurate, so_they can be used only_for a rough classification of our_sample. It_can also_be seen in figure \[f2\] that these two criteria are also_not in particularly good agreement.

For the_final sample we apply_additional criteria_to_exclude observations with_large_errors, having_selected galaxies small enough to ensure that_the spectrum_comes from most of the projected_area of the galaxy._More_specifically, we only retained galaxies which_had uncertainties in the fiber and_model magnitudes in the r_band_less_than 0.01 mag, and had_an uncertainty in the concentration index_C less than_0.15. The final sample contains 33670 spectra_of_galaxies covering the whole range of_redshifts_and galaxy types present in the_SDSS_sample.

The_extension of the observed spectra_of galaxies
-------------------------------------------------

The extension of the observed_SDSS spectra to Gaia wavelengths was made by using_the 28885 synthetic_spectra of the second library_produced_at_a random grid of parameters (Tsalmantza et al. [@tsalmantza2]). In_order to_find the synthetic_spectrum that is in best agreement with each observed spectrum,_we first had to make the two_libraries compatible. The main differences between them are the effects of_foreground reddening, noise and redshift, which are present_in the SDSS spectra but absent in_the synthetic