pt minus 1fil}\frac{\prod_{i=1}^{k-1} \mu(d_{i}) \mu(d'_{i}) F_{i}(\log_x d_{i}) G_{i}(\log_x d'_{i}) }{{\varphi}(q_{W,d_1,\dots,d'_{k-1}})} = \frac{1}{{\varphi}(W)} (c'+o(1)) B^{-k+1},$$ where $$c' := \prod_{i=1}^{k-1} \int_0^1 F'_i(t) G'_i(t)\ dt$$ (note that $F_i, G_i$ are supported on $[0,1]$ by hypothesis), so by it suffices to show that $$\label{cpeps}
\sum_{x+h_k \leq n \leq 2x+h_k} \lambda_{F_k}(n) \lambda_{G_k}(n) {\mathbf{1}}_{p(n)>x^{\varepsilon}} = (c''_{\varepsilon}+ o(1)) \frac{x}{\log x},$$ where $c''_{{\varepsilon}}$ is a quantity depending on ${\varepsilon}$ but not on $x$ such that $$\lim_{{\varepsilon}\to 0} c''_{{\varepsilon}} = \int_0^1 F'_k(t) G'_k(t)\ dt.$$ In the case $S(F_k)+S(G_k) < 1$, this would follow easily from (the $k=1$ case of) Theorem \[nonprime-asym\](i) and Proposition \[almostprime\]. In the general case, we may appeal once more to the fundamental theorem of arithmetic. As before, we may factor $n = p_1 \dots p_r$ for some $x^{\varepsilon}\leq p_1 \leq \dots \leq p_r \leq 2x+h_k$ and $r \leq \frac{1}{{\varepsilon}}+1$. The contribution of those $n$ with a repeated prime factor $p_i = p_{i+1}$ can easily be shown to be ${\llcurly}x^{1-{\varepsilon}}$ in the same manner we dealt with $\Sigma_2$, so we may restrict attention to the square-free $n$, for which the $p_i$ are strictly increasing. In that case, one can write $$\lambda
pt minus 1fil}\frac{\prod_{i=1}^{k-1 } \mu(d_{i }) \mu(d'_{i }) F_{i}(\log_x d_{i }) G_{i}(\log_x d'_{i }) } { { \varphi}(q_{W, d_1,\dots, d'_{k-1 } }) } = \frac{1}{{\varphi}(W) } (c'+o(1) ) B^{-k+1},$$ where $ $ c': = \prod_{i=1}^{k-1 } \int_0 ^ 1 F'_i(t) G'_i(t)\ dt$$ (note that $ F_i, G_i$ are supported on $ [ 0,1]$ by hypothesis), so by it suffice to picture that $ $ \label{cpeps } 
 \sum_{x+h_k \leq n \leq 2x+h_k } \lambda_{F_k}(n) \lambda_{G_k}(n) { \mathbf{1}}_{p(n)>x^{\varepsilon } } = (c''_{\varepsilon}+ o(1) ) \frac{x}{\log x},$$ where $ c''_{{\varepsilon}}$ is a quantity depend on $ { \varepsilon}$ but not on $ x$ such that $ $ \lim_{{\varepsilon}\to 0 } c''_{{\varepsilon } } = \int_0 ^ 1 F'_k(t) G'_k(t)\ dt.$$ In the lawsuit $ S(F_k)+S(G_k) < 1 $, this would follow easily from (the $ k=1 $ character of) Theorem \[nonprime - asym\](i) and Proposition \[almostprime\ ]. In the cosmopolitan case, we may appeal once more to the fundamental theorem of arithmetic. As before, we may factor $ normality = p_1 \dots p_r$ for some $ x^{\varepsilon}\leq p_1 \leq \dots \leq p_r \leq 2x+h_k$ and $ r \leq \frac{1}{{\varepsilon}}+1$. The contribution of those $ n$ with a repeated choice agent $ p_i = p_{i+1}$ can easily be shown to be $ { \llcurly}x^{1-{\varepsilon}}$ in the same manner we dealt with $ \Sigma_2 $, so we may restrict care to the square - free $ n$, for which the $ p_i$ are strictly increase. In that case, one can write $ $ \lambda
pt linus 1fil}\frac{\prod_{i=1}^{k-1} \mu(d_{i}) \mu(d'_{i}) F_{i}(\log_x d_{i}) G_{i}(\log_x d'_{i}) }{{\vadphi}(q_{W,d_1,\duts,d'_{k-1}})} = \frac{1}{{\varphi}(W)} (c'+o(1)) B^{-k+1},$$ whece $$c' := \proe_{i=1}^{k-1} \int_0^1 F'_i(t) G'_i(t)\ dt$$ (notd that $F_i, G_i$ are wuppieted on $[0,1]$ bb hypothcfis), al by mt suffices to xhow that $$\nabel{cpeps}
\sum_{x+v_k \lzq n \leq 2x+h_k} \lambda_{F_k}(n) \lambda_{G_k}(n) {\matrbf{1}}_{p(n)>x^{\vsrfpsilon}} = (c''_{\vareksilom}+ o(1)) \fdac{x}{\log x},$$ where $c''_{{\varepsilon}}$ is a qhantity depending on ${\varepsilon}$ but not on $x$ skch hhat $$\lim_{{\varepsilon}\ho 0} c''_{{\varepsulon}} = \int_0^1 F'_k(t) G'_k(t)\ dt.$$ In the case $S(F_k)+S(G_k) < 1$, this would follow easily froo (the $k=1$ case of) Tyeoggm \[nonprime-awym\](i) wnd Propositlpn \[almmstprimr\]. In the genersl rase, we may appeal once mmre to the fundamegtal theosej of arithmetic. Aw veforg, we kay wqctur $h = p_1 \dots o_r$ hor some $x^{\vzrepsilon}\lew p_1 \leq \dots \leq p_r \lqw 2x+h_k$ and $r \lsq \fras{1}{{\vwrepsilon}}+1$. The contribution of those $n$ wpth z repeated prime factor $p_i = p_{i+1}$ can easily be shown to be ${\llcurly}x^{1-{\varepsilon}}$ in the same manner we deald witi $\Rigna_2$, ri ae may restrict attention to the square-free $n$, rot ehich the $p_i$ ave strictly increaxijg. Yn that case, une cau wdite $$\lambda
pt minus 1fil}\frac{\prod_{i=1}^{k-1} \mu(d_{i}) \mu(d'_{i}) F_{i}(\log_x d_{i}) }{{\varphi}(q_{W,d_1,\dots,d'_{k-1}})} \frac{1}{{\varphi}(W)} (c'+o(1)) where $$c' := (note $F_i, G_i$ are on $[0,1]$ by so by it suffices to show $$\label{cpeps} \sum_{x+h_k \leq n \leq 2x+h_k} \lambda_{F_k}(n) \lambda_{G_k}(n) {\mathbf{1}}_{p(n)>x^{\varepsilon}} = (c''_{\varepsilon}+ o(1)) \frac{x}{\log where $c''_{{\varepsilon}}$ is a quantity depending on ${\varepsilon}$ but not on $x$ such $$\lim_{{\varepsilon}\to c''_{{\varepsilon}} \int_0^1 G'_k(t)\ dt.$$ In the case $S(F_k)+S(G_k) < 1$, this would follow easily from (the $k=1$ case Theorem \[nonprime-asym\](i) and Proposition \[almostprime\]. In the general we may appeal once to the fundamental theorem of As we may $n p_1 p_r$ for some p_1 \leq \dots \leq p_r \leq 2x+h_k$ and $r \leq \frac{1}{{\varepsilon}}+1$. The contribution of those $n$ with repeated prime = p_{i+1}$ easily shown be ${\llcurly}x^{1-{\varepsilon}}$ in manner we dealt with $\Sigma_2$, so attention to the square-free $n$, for which the are strictly In that case, one can write
pt minus 1fil}\frac{\prod_{i=1}^{k-1} \mu(d_{i}) \mU(d'_{i}) F_{i}(\log_x d_{I}) G_{i}(\loG_x d'_{I}) }{{\vaRpHi}(q_{W,D_1,\dotS,d'_{k-1}})} = \frac{1}{{\varphi}(W)} (C'+O(1)) B^{-k+1},$$ wHere $$c' := \prod_{i=1}^{k-1} \int_0^1 F'_i(t) G'_i(t)\ dt$$ (Note tHaT $f_i, G_i$ ARe SuppoRted on $[0,1]$ bY HyPOTheSiS), sO by It SUfFices To sHow that $$\Label{cpeps}
\Sum_{X+h_K \leq n \leq 2x+h_k} \lAMbDa_{F_k}(n) \lambdA_{G_k}(N) {\mathbf{1}}_{p(n)>x^{\vaRepSilon}} = (c''_{\VaRepSIlon}+ o(1)) \FraC{x}{\log X},$$ where $C''_{{\VarepsIlon}}$ is a quAnTIty depENding on ${\VARePsilOn}$ but not on $x$ such thAT $$\lIM_{{\varepsilon}\to 0} c''_{{\VarepsIlON}} = \iNT_0^1 f'_k(t) g'_k(t)\ Dt.$$ In the casE $S(f_k)+S(G_k) < 1$, THis woulD FoLLOW eaSIly from (the $k=1$ caSe of) Theorem \[NOnpRime-asYm\](I) anD proposItion \[AlMOstPrime\]. In the gEnerAl case, we mAy appeAL once moRE to the fUndameNtaL thEoreM Of ArIthMeTIc. AS BeForE, We mAy factor $N = p_1 \DoTs p_r$ fOr soME $X^{\VArepSilOn}\leQ p_1 \leq \Dots \leq p_r \leq 2x+H_k$ aNd $r \lEQ \frAc{1}{{\varEpsilOn}}+1$. ThE cOntriBution Of thoSe $N$ with a repeated pRime Factor $p_i = p_{I+1}$ caN eAsiLy Be shoWN to be ${\lLcuRly}X^{1-{\varepsIlon}}$ in tHE saMe MANNeR we dealt with $\Sigma_2$, sO wE MAy Restrict AttentIOn To THe square-FrEe $n$, For wHICh the $P_i$ arE StRictly inCreasiNG. IN tHat case, OnE can wrItE $$\laMbdA
pt minus 1fil}\frac{\prod_ {i=1}^{k-1 } \mu (d_ {i} )\mu( d'_{ i}) F_{i}(\log _ x d_ {i}) G_{i}(\log_x d'_{ i}) } {{ \ varp h i} (q_{W ,d_1,\d o ts , d '_{ k- 1} })}  = \f rac{1 }{{ \varphi }(W)} (c'+ o(1 ))  B^{-k+1},$$ wh ere $$c' : = \ prod_{i=1}^{ k-1 } \int _0 ^1F '_i(t ) G '_i(t )\ dt$ $  (note  that $F_ i, G_i$ a r e suppo r t ed  on$[0,1]$ by hypoth e si s ), so by it su ffices  t o  s h o w t hat  $$\label{ cp eps}\ sum_{x+ h _k \ l eqn  \leq 2x+h_k}  \lambda_{F _ k}( n) \la mb da_ { G_k}(n ) {\m at h bf{ 1}}_{p(n)>x ^{\v arepsilon }} = ( c ''_{\va r epsilon }+ o(1 ))\fr ac{x } {\ lo g x }, $ $ w h er e $ c ''_ {{\varep si lo n}}$is a q u a ntit y d epen dingon ${\varepsi lon }$ b u t n ot on  $x$such  t hat $ $\lim_ {{\va re psilon}\to 0} c ''_{ {\varepsi lon }}  =\i nt_0^ 1  F'_k( t)G'_ k(t)\ d t.$$ In the  c a s e  $ S(F_k)+S(G_k) < 1$ ,t h is  would f ollowe as il y  from (t he  $k =1$c a se of ) Th e or em \[non prime- a sy m\ ](i) an dPropos it ion  \[ almos t prim e\]. I n the ge neral case, we may a p peal once mor e  t o th e  fun dam ental theor em o f  ari thme t ic . A s  befo re, w em ay factor $n = p_1 \do ts  p_r$for s ome $x^{\vare psilon}\le q p _1 \leq\dot s  \ l eq p_r \leq 2x +h_k$  and $r \l e q \frac{ 1}{{\ varepsil on}}+1$.T h e contri but ion  of  th o s e$n$ with a re p e ated  p rime fa cto r $p_i= p _{i +1} $ c an  easily b e shownto  b e${ \ll curly } x^{1-{\v ar eps il on} }$ in the sa me ma nner  w ed eal t with$ \S i g ma_2 $,  s o we  ma yrestr icta tte ntion t o the squ are - free  $ n$ , for w hich the $p_i $are strict ly  in creasi n g . In tha t case, one can write $ $ \lambda 
pt minus_1fil}\frac{\prod_{i=1}^{k-1} \mu(d_{i})_\mu(d'_{i}) F_{i}(\log_x d_{i}) G_{i}(\log_x_d'_{i}) }{{\varphi}(q_{W,d_1,\dots,d'_{k-1}})}_=_\frac{1}{{\varphi}(W)} (c'+o(1))_B^{-k+1},$$_where $$c' :=_\prod_{i=1}^{k-1} \int_0^1 F'_i(t)_G'_i(t)\ dt$$ (note that_$F_i, G_i$ are_supported_on $[0,1]$ by hypothesis), so by it suffices to show that $$\label{cpeps}
\sum_{x+h_k \leq n_\leq_2x+h_k} \lambda_{F_k}(n)_\lambda_{G_k}(n)_{\mathbf{1}}_{p(n)>x^{\varepsilon}}_= (c''_{\varepsilon}+ o(1)) \frac{x}{\log x},$$_where $c''_{{\varepsilon}}$ is a quantity_depending on_${\varepsilon}$ but not on $x$ such that $$\lim_{{\varepsilon}\to_0}_c''_{{\varepsilon}} = \int_0^1_F'_k(t) G'_k(t)\ dt.$$ In the case $S(F_k)+S(G_k) < 1$,_this would follow easily from (the_$k=1$ case of)_Theorem_\[nonprime-asym\](i)_and Proposition \[almostprime\]. In_the general case, we may appeal_once more to the fundamental theorem_of arithmetic. As before, we may factor_$n = p_1 \dots p_r$ for_some $x^{\varepsilon}\leq p_1 \leq \dots_\leq p_r_\leq 2x+h_k$ and $r \leq_\frac{1}{{\varepsilon}}+1$. The contribution_of those_$n$ with a_repeated prime factor $p_i = p_{i+1}$_can easily be_shown to be ${\llcurly}x^{1-{\varepsilon}}$ in the_same_manner we dealt_with_$\Sigma_2$,_so we_may restrict attention_to_the square-free_$n$,_for which the $p_i$ are strictly_increasing._In that case, one can write $$\lambda