size batteries very closely, while the energy overflow probability with the finite-size battery is less than the approximation for threshold values close to the battery size. However, we can accurately approximate the energy overflow probability for threshold values less than the battery size. Our approximation matches the finite-size battery simulations very closely for energy threshold values up to $80\%$ of the battery capacity, which is $400$ energy units in our simulations. In a real setting, one should not charge a battery completely but up to $80\%$ in order to improve the battery life-span and the energy efficiency [@battery_uni_2; @website_2].

In Fig. \[fig:fig\_2\], we plot the energy outage probability, $\pi_{0}$ in (\[eq:upper\_bound\_pi\_0\]), as a function of the energy decay rate, $\mu$, for different scale parameters, $\lambda_{\text{dB}}=10\log_{10}\frac{\lambda}{N\sigma_{w}^{2}}=5$, $4$ and $3$ dB, when the shape parameter is $k=1$. Note that the mean value of the Weibull distribution is $\lambda\Gamma(1+1/k)$, where $\Gamma(\cdot)$ is the Gamma function. So, $\lambda$ becomes the average energy arrival rate when $k=1$. If we use all the energy for data transmission, we can consider $\lambda_{\text{dB}}$ as the average signal-to-noise ratio in the channel. In addition, given the energy decay rate, we determine the constant energy demand rate. Particularly, given that the energy packets arriving at the battery are i.i.d., the constant energy demand rate is $p=\frac{1}{\mu}\ln\mathbb{E}_{u}\left[e^{\mu u}\right]=\frac{1}{\mu}\ln\left(\frac{1}{1-\lambda\mu}\right)$ for $0<\mu<\frac{1}{\lambda}$. Notice that when $\mu$ goes to zero, $p$ approaches the average energy arrival rate, $\lambda$, whereas when $\mu$ goes to $\frac{1}{\lambda}$, $p$ approaches infinity. Therefore, the outage probability becomes 1 once $\mu$ is greater than $\frac{1}{\lambda}$ for a given energy arrival process with the aforementioned distribution, which is displayed in Fig. \[fig:fig\_2\]. We can also infer that the energy out
size batteries very closely, while the energy overflow probability with the finite - size barrage is less than the estimate for doorway values close to the barrage size. However, we can accurately approximate the energy overflow probability for doorway values less than the battery size. Our estimate equal the finite - size barrage simulations very closely for department of energy threshold values up to $ 80\%$ of the battery capacity, which is $ 400 $ energy units in our simulations. In a actual setting, one should not charge a battery wholly but up to $ 80\%$ in order to improve the barrage life - bridge and the energy efficiency [ @battery_uni_2; @website_2 ]. 

 In Fig. \[fig: fig\_2\ ], we plat the energy outage probability, $ \pi_{0}$ in (\[eq: upper\_bound\_pi\_0\ ]), as a function of the energy decay pace, $ \mu$, for different scale parameters, $ \lambda_{\text{dB}}=10\log_{10}\frac{\lambda}{N\sigma_{w}^{2}}=5 $, $ 4 $ and $ 3 $ dB, when the shape parameter is $ k=1$. Note that the mean value of the Weibull distribution is $ \lambda\Gamma(1 + 1 / k)$, where $ \Gamma(\cdot)$ is the Gamma affair. So, $ \lambda$ becomes the average energy arrival rate when $ k=1$. If we use all the energy for data transmission, we can consider $ \lambda_{\text{dB}}$ as the modal signal - to - noise ratio in the distribution channel. In addition, given the energy decay rate, we settle the constant energy demand rate. peculiarly, given that the energy packets arriving at the battery are i.i.d. , the constant energy demand rate is $ p=\frac{1}{\mu}\ln\mathbb{E}_{u}\left[e^{\mu u}\right]=\frac{1}{\mu}\ln\left(\frac{1}{1-\lambda\mu}\right)$ for $ 0<\mu<\frac{1}{\lambda}$. Notice that when $ \mu$ goes to zero, $ p$ approaches the modal energy arrival pace, $ \lambda$, whereas when $ \mu$ run to $ \frac{1}{\lambda}$, $ p$ approaches infinity. Therefore, the outage probability become 1 once $ \mu$ is greater than $ \frac{1}{\lambda}$ for a given energy arrival procedure with the aforementioned distribution, which is displayed in Fig. \[fig: fig\_2\ ]. We can also infer that the department of energy out
sizf batteries very closely, while the eneryt overhlow prkbabilith with the finite-size batterb is less than the approximatiov for thrvshold vaoues xlose to tis battevv sizs. Howzvxr, we can accurstely apprmximate the enarey overflow probability for threshold values lfss than the bwttegy sizs. Our approximation matches the fihite-sizt battery simulatipns very closely for energj thgeshold values up ho $80\%$ of the vattqey capacity, dhich is $400$ tnzrgy units jn our simulations. In a real segting, one shoule bot wharge a bavtery bompletely bub up to $80\%$ in orcer to improve thx bartery life-span and thx energy efficiency [@fattery_unh_2; @cebsite_2].

In Fig. \[fig:fig\_2\], qe plot the enefty uutzgx pdobabipitb, $\pi_{0}$ in (\[eq:ulper\_bound\_pi\_0\]), as a function of tne vmergy decay date, $\mt$, sor different scale parameters, $\lambda_{\teqt{dB}}=10\mog_{10}\frac{\lambda}{N\sigma_{w}^{2}}=5$, $4$ abd $3$ dB, when the shape parametew is $k=1$. Note that the mean value of the Weibull divtribntkon if $\oalbda\Gamma(1+1/k)$, where $\Gamma(\cdot)$ is the Gamma functykn. Sp, $\lambda$ becomcs the average enetgj strival rate whgn $k=1$. If we use all the energj for dwta teansmissijn, wr can consider $\lambda_{\text{dB}}$ as the avercge signal-to-noise ratno in the chcnnel. On adcition, given the energy deczy rate, we fetermine ghe constant enefgy damand raud. Particularly, giden that vhe euergy pazketx arriding at thf batbary are i.i.d., the cojstanj enercy demand gate is $p=\frac{1}{\mu}\ln\mathbb{E}_{u}\left[e^{\mn u}\right]=\frac{1}{\mo}\ln\nefn(\frac{1}{1-\lambba\mu}\rinht)$ for $0<\mu<\frac{1}{\lwmbda}$. Notice tkat when $\mu$ gues to zerk, $p$ appcoaches the wverage energf arrival ratx, $\lambda$, rherwas qhen $\mu$ eoes to $\frac{1}{\lakbda}$, $p$ apirjachws infinity. Therefpre, fhe outage probcyioity becomes 1 omce $\mu$ id jreatqs than $\frac{1}{\ldmbdx}$ fut a gkven entxgy xrrifal process with the afodementioned distrinubion, whicy is dis[layed in Fig. \[fig:fig\_2\]. We can alsl infxr thav the rnetgy out
size batteries very closely, while the energy with finite-size battery less than the to battery size. However, can accurately approximate energy overflow probability for threshold values than the battery size. Our approximation matches the finite-size battery simulations very closely energy threshold values up to $80\%$ of the battery capacity, which is $400$ units our In real setting, one should not charge a battery completely but up to $80\%$ in order to the battery life-span and the energy efficiency [@battery_uni_2; In Fig. \[fig:fig\_2\], we the energy outage probability, $\pi_{0}$ (\[eq:upper\_bound\_pi\_0\]), a function the decay $\mu$, for different parameters, $\lambda_{\text{dB}}=10\log_{10}\frac{\lambda}{N\sigma_{w}^{2}}=5$, $4$ and $3$ dB, when the shape parameter is $k=1$. Note that the mean value the Weibull $\lambda\Gamma(1+1/k)$, where is Gamma So, $\lambda$ becomes energy arrival rate when $k=1$. If the energy for data transmission, we can consider as the signal-to-noise ratio in the channel. In given the energy decay rate, we determine the energy demand rate. Particularly, given that the energy packets arriving at the battery are i.i.d., energy demand rate is u}\right]=\frac{1}{\mu}\ln\left(\frac{1}{1-\lambda\mu}\right)$ for $0<\mu<\frac{1}{\lambda}$. that $\mu$ to $p$ approaches average energy arrival rate, $\lambda$, whereas when $\mu$ goes to $\frac{1}{\lambda}$, approaches infinity. Therefore, the outage probability becomes 1 once $\mu$ than for a given arrival process with the distribution, is displayed in Fig. can infer out
size batteries very closely, wHile the eneRgy ovErfLow PrObabIlitY with the finite-SIze bAttery is less than the appRoximAtIOn foR ThReshoLd valueS ClOSE to ThE bAttErY SiZe. HowEveR, we can aCcurately aPprOxImate the enerGY oVerflow proBabIlity for threShoLd valuEs LesS Than tHe bAtterY size. OUR approXimation mAtCHes the FInite-siZE BaTterY simulations very cLOsELy for energy thrEshold VaLUeS UP to $80\%$ Of tHe battery cApAcity, WHich is $400$ eNErGY UNitS In our simulatiOns. In a real sETtiNg, one sHoUld NOt charGe a baTtERy cOmpletely buT up tO $80\%$ in order tO improVE the batTEry life-Span anD thE enErgy EFfIcIenCy [@BAttERy_Uni_2; @WEbsIte_2].

In Fig. \[FiG:fIg\_2\], we pLot tHE ENErgy OutAge pRobabIlity, $\pi_{0}$ in (\[eq:upPer\_BounD\_Pi\_0\]), aS a funCtion Of thE eNergy Decay rAte, $\mu$, FoR different scale ParaMeters, $\lamBda_{\TeXt{db}}=10\lOg_{10}\fraC{\Lambda}{n\siGma_{W}^{2}}=5$, $4$ and $3$ dB, wHen the sHApe PaRAMEtEr is $k=1$. Note that the meAn VALuE of the WeIbull dIStRiBUtion is $\lAmBda\gammA(1+1/K)$, Where $\gammA(\CdOt)$ is the GAmma fuNCtIoN. So, $\lambDa$ BecomeS tHe aVerAge enERgy aRrival Rate when $K=1$. If we USe all the energy FOr data transmiSSiON, We CAn coNsiDer $\lambda_{\teXt{dB}}$ AS the AverAGe SigNAl-to-nOise rAtIO iN The channel. In additioN, gIven thE enerGy decay rate, we Determine tHE COnstant eNergY DeMAnd rate. ParticuLarly, Given that tHE energy pAcketS arrivinG at the batTERy are i.i.d., The ConStaNt eNERgY demand rate is $P=\FRac{1}{\mU}\lN\mathbb{e}_{u}\lEft[e^{\mu u}\RigHt]=\fRac{1}{\Mu}\lN\lEft(\frac{1}{1-\laMbda\mu}\riGhT)$ fOr $0<\Mu<\FraC{1}{\lambDA}$. Notice tHaT whEn $\Mu$ gOes to ZEro, $p$ apProacHes tHe AvERagE energy ARrIVAl raTe, $\LaMbda$, WheReAs wheN $\mu$ gOEs tO $\frac{1}{\laMbda}$, $p$ apprOacHEs inFiNiTy. ThereFore, the outage PrObability bEcOmeS 1 once $\mU$ IS greater Than $\frac{1}{\lambda}$ for a given ENergy arRivAl proCess With the afOreMentioNed DIstribUtion, wHich iS dIspLAYed in fIG. \[fIg:fIg\_2\]. we can also iNFEr tHat thE eNergY out
size batteries very closel y, while t he en erg y o ve rflo w pr obability with thefinite-size battery is  less  t h an t h eappro ximatio n  f o r  th re sh old  v a lu es cl ose  to the  battery s ize .However, wec an  accuratel y a pproximate t heenergy  o ver f low p rob abili ty for thresh old value sl ess th a n the b a t te ry s ize. Our approxim a ti o n matches thefinite -s i ze b att ery  simulatio ns  very closely fo r e ner g y threshold v alues up to $80 \%$ of  t heb attery  capa ci t y,which is $4 00$energy un its in our sim u lations . In a  re alsett i ng ,one  s h oul d  n otc har ge a bat te ry  comp lete l y b ut u p t o $8 0\%$in order to i mpr ovet hebatte ry li fe-s pa n and  the e nergy  e fficiency [@bat tery _uni_2; @ web si te_ 2] .

In Fig. \ [fi g:f ig\_2\] , we pl o t t he e n er gy outage probabil it y ,  $ \pi_{0}$  in (\ [ eq :u p per\_bou nd \_p i\_0 \ ] ), as  a f u nc tion ofthe en e rg ydecay r at e, $\m u$ , f ordiffe r entscaleparamete rs, $ \ lambda_{\text{ d B}}=10\log_{1 0 }\ f r ac { \lam bda }{N\sigma_{ w}^{ 2 }}=5 $, $ 4 $and $3$ d B, wh en th e  shape parameter is  $ k=1$.Notethat the mean  value oft h e  Weibull  dis t ri b ution is $\lam bda\G amma(1+1/k ) $, where  $\Ga mma(\cdo t)$ is th e Gamma fu nct ion . S o,$ \ la mbda$ becomes t he a ve rage en erg y arriv alrat e w hen  $ k=1$. Ifwe use a ll  t he  e ner gy fo r  data tr an smi ss ion , wec an con sider  $\l am bd a _{\ text{dB } }$ a s th eav erag e s ig nal-t o-no i seratio i n the cha nne l . In  a dd ition,given the ene rg y decay ra te , w e dete r m ine theconstant energy demandr ate. Pa rti cular ly,given tha t t he ene rgy packet s arri vingat  th e batte r y  a rei. i.d., thec o nst ant e ne rgydemandrate is $p=\frac{1 } {\m u}\ln\mathbb{ E}_ {u}\ l e ft [e^ { \m u  u} \r i ght ] = \frac{1}{\mu}\l n\left(\fr ac { 1} {1-\lambda \ mu} \r ight)$for $0< \mu<\ f rac{1}{ \lambda}$ . Noticeth at w h e n $ \mu$ goesto zero,  $p$ appr o aches th e ave rag e ener gy  ar rival  rate, $\l ambda $, whe re as whe n $\m u$  goes to  $\frac{1}{\lambda}$, $ p$ app roach esinfinity.  Th e ref ore, theouta ge probabi lit y b ecome s 1 once$\mu $  i s g r eater  tha n  $\frac{1 } {\ lam b d a} $ for a giv e n ene rgy a rri v al pro cess  with the aforeme n tioned distrib utio n ,  wh ich is d is played in Fig.  \[ fi g : fig\_2\] .We can also  infer t ha t  theenergy  out
size batteries_very closely,_while the energy overflow_probability with_the_finite-size battery_is_less than the_approximation for threshold_values close to the_battery size. However,_we_can accurately approximate the energy overflow probability for threshold values less than the battery_size._Our approximation_matches_the_finite-size battery simulations very closely_for energy threshold values up_to $80\%$_of the battery capacity, which is $400$ energy_units_in our simulations._In a real setting, one should not charge a_battery completely but up to $80\%$_in order to_improve_the_battery life-span and the_energy efficiency [@battery_uni_2; @website_2].

In Fig. \[fig:fig\_2\],_we plot the energy outage probability,_$\pi_{0}$ in (\[eq:upper\_bound\_pi\_0\]), as a function of_the energy decay rate, $\mu$, for_different scale parameters, $\lambda_{\text{dB}}=10\log_{10}\frac{\lambda}{N\sigma_{w}^{2}}=5$, $4$_and $3$_dB, when the shape parameter_is $k=1$. Note_that the_mean value of_the Weibull distribution is $\lambda\Gamma(1+1/k)$, where_$\Gamma(\cdot)$ is the_Gamma function. So, $\lambda$ becomes the_average_energy arrival rate_when_$k=1$._If we_use all the_energy_for data_transmission,_we can consider $\lambda_{\text{dB}}$ as the_average_signal-to-noise ratio in the channel. In addition,_given the energy decay_rate,_we determine the constant_energy demand rate. Particularly, given_that the energy packets arriving at_the battery_are i.i.d.,_the constant energy demand rate is $p=\frac{1}{\mu}\ln\mathbb{E}_{u}\left[e^{\mu u}\right]=\frac{1}{\mu}\ln\left(\frac{1}{1-\lambda\mu}\right)$ for $0<\mu<\frac{1}{\lambda}$. Notice_that when $\mu$ goes to zero,_$p$ approaches the average_energy arrival_rate,_$\lambda$, whereas when_$\mu$_goes to_$\frac{1}{\lambda}$, $p$ approaches infinity. Therefore, the outage_probability becomes_1 once $\mu$ is greater than_$\frac{1}{\lambda}$ for a given_energy_arrival process with the aforementioned distribution,_which is displayed in Fig. \[fig:fig\_2\]._We can also infer that_the_energy_out