 scale setting procedure where ${a_t = \frac{a_t m_\Omega}{m_\Omega^\mathrm{phys}}}$, using the $\Omega$ baryon mass determined on these lattices,, and the physical $\Omega$ baryon mass.

Reduced symmetry of a finite cubic lattice {#sec_symmetries}
==========================================

The symmetry of a lattice in a finite volume is reduced compared to that of continuous space in an infinite volume. Our implementation, a spatially cubic lattice discretization in a cubic box with periodic boundary conditions, has the symmetry of a cube. The relevant symmetry group for a system of hadrons overall at rest is therefore the double cover of the octahedral (or cubic) group with parity, $O_h^D$. For a system “in-flight” with overall non-zero momentum, $\vec{P} \neq \vec{0}$, the appropriate symmetry is reduced further to that of the *little group* [@Moore:2005dw], $\textrm{LG}(\vec{P})$, the subgroup of $O_h^D$ which leaves $\vec{P}$ invariant[^1]. The spatially periodic boundary conditions quantize the allowed momenta, $\vec{p} = \frac{2\pi}{L}(n,m,p)$, where $L$ is the spatial extent of the lattice in physical units and $n,m,p$ are integers; we write this in a compact notation as $\vec{p} = [n,m,p]$ or $[n m p]$.

The consequences of this reduced symmetry for scattering have been discussed in detail in Refs. [@Dudek:2012gj; @Dudek:2012xn]. In brief, at zero momentum the continuum spin, $J$, is not a good quantum number and states are instead labelled by irreducible representations, *irreps*, of $O_h^D$. Parity, $P$, and any relevant flavor quantum numbers are still good. For $\vec{P} \neq \vec{0}$, $J$ and the helicity, $\lambda$, are not good quantum numbers and states are classified by the irreps of $\textrm{LG}(\vec{P})$. Any relevant flavor quantum numbers are still good but, in general, parity is *not* apart from for the $\lambda = 0$ components where $\tilde{\eta} \equiv P (-1)^J$ is a good quantum number [@Thomas:2011
scale setting procedure where $ { a_t = \frac{a_t m_\Omega}{m_\Omega^\mathrm{phys}}}$, using the $ \Omega$ baryon bulk determine on these lattices, , and the physical $ \Omega$ baryon mass. 

 Reduced isotropy of a finite cubic lattice { # sec_symmetries } 
 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 

 The symmetry of a lattice in a finite bulk is reduced compared to that of continuous outer space in an infinite volume. Our execution, a spatially cubic lattice discretization in a cubic box with periodic boundary conditions, has the isotropy of a cube. The relevant symmetry group for a arrangement of hadrons overall at rest is consequently the double cover of the octahedral (or cubic) group with parity, $ O_h^D$. For a organization “ in - flight ” with overall non - zero momentum, $ \vec{P } \neq \vec{0}$, the appropriate symmetry is reduce far to that of the * little group *   [ @Moore:2005dw ], $ \textrm{LG}(\vec{P})$, the subgroup of $ O_h^D$ which leave $ \vec{P}$ invariant[^1 ]. The spatially periodic boundary conditions quantize the allowed momenta, $ \vec{p } = \frac{2\pi}{L}(n, m, p)$, where $ L$ is the spatial extent of the wicket in physical units and $ n, m, p$ are integers; we write this in a compact notation as $ \vec{p } = [ n, m, p]$ or $ [ newton m p]$. 

 The consequences of this reduced symmetry for scattering have been discussed in detail in Refs.   [ @Dudek:2012gj; @Dudek:2012xn ]. In brief, at zero momentum the continuum spin, $ J$, is not a good quantum number and states are alternatively labelled by irreducible representations, * irreps *, of $ O_h^D$. Parity, $ P$, and any relevant relish quantum number are still good. For $ \vec{P } \neq \vec{0}$, $ J$ and the helicity, $ \lambda$, are not good quantum issue and states are classified by the irreps of $ \textrm{LG}(\vec{P})$. Any relevant flavor quantum numbers are however good but, in general, parity is * not * apart from for the $ \lambda = 0 $ components where $ \tilde{\eta } \equiv P (-1)^J$ is a dependable quantum number   [ @Thomas:2011
 scwle setting procedure whtre ${a_t = \frac{a_t m_\Omega}{m_\Omxga^\mathdm{phys}}}$, uring the $\Omega$ baryon mass dxternined on these lattices,, and the physpcal $\Omegq$ bacyon mass.

Reduced symmetrn of z finntx cubic lattice {#sec_symmetsies}
==========================================

The symmetsy oy a lattice in a finite volume is requced cpmoared to that jf cpgtinhous space in an infinite volume. Ohr impltmentation, a spatislly cubic lattice discretlzatlon in a cubic box with perioeic fiundary condktions, has the symmetri of a cube. The relevant symmetrh grobp for a sywtwm lx hadrons oterall at rest is bnerefose the couble cover on the ocrahedral (or cubic) gronp with parity, $O_h^D$. Fjr a systam “in-flight” with ovwrqll nmn-zeso munengum, $\vxc{P} \neq \vfc{0}$, vhe approprjate symmetey is reduced furthtr ei that of the *littlq droup* [@Moore:2005dw], $\textrm{LG}(\vec{P})$, the subgroup mf $K_h^D$ which leaves $\vec{P}$ ibvariant[^1]. The spatialli periodic boundary conditions quantize the allowed momenta, $\vec{p} = \frcg{2\ii}{L}(n,o,p)$, ahere $L$ is the spatial extent of the lattice yh khyxical units anb $n,m,p$ are integets; wr write this iv a compadt notation as $\vec{o} = [n,m,p]$ jr $[n n p]$.

The cogseqiences of this reduced symmwtry for scanterung have been discbssed in detcil in Refs. [@Cudek:2012gj; @Dudek:2012xn]. In briey, at zsro momentul the confknuum spin, $J$, is vot a good quantum number and seates are inscead labdllec by iwreducible reprcventations, *irreps*, lf $O_h^B$. Parhty, $P$, and wny relevant flavor quantum numuxrs are still gmod. For $\vec{'} \neq \yec{0}$, $J$ and the hqlicity, $\lambda$, are noc good quantum nlmbers anv states are classified bf the irreps mf $\textri{LG}(\vwc{P})$. Qny reldxant flavor qusntum numytrs are stull good but, in gekeral, larity is *not* a'cru drom for the $\lsmbaa = 0$ bom'onenev where $\tilda{\eta} \eqjov P (-1)^G$ is a good duanyum number [@Thomas:2011
scale setting procedure where ${a_t = \frac{a_t the baryon mass on these lattices,, mass. symmetry of a cubic lattice {#sec_symmetries} The symmetry of a lattice in finite volume is reduced compared to that of continuous space in an infinite Our implementation, a spatially cubic lattice discretization in a cubic box with periodic conditions, the of cube. The relevant symmetry group for a system of hadrons overall at rest is therefore the cover of the octahedral (or cubic) group with $O_h^D$. For a system with overall non-zero momentum, $\vec{P} \vec{0}$, appropriate symmetry reduced to of the *little [@Moore:2005dw], $\textrm{LG}(\vec{P})$, the subgroup of $O_h^D$ which leaves $\vec{P}$ invariant[^1]. The spatially periodic boundary conditions quantize the momenta, $\vec{p} where $L$ the extent the lattice in and $n,m,p$ are integers; we write compact notation as $\vec{p} = [n,m,p]$ or $[n p]$. The of this reduced symmetry for scattering been discussed in detail in Refs. [@Dudek:2012gj; @Dudek:2012xn]. brief, at zero momentum the continuum spin, $J$, is not a good quantum number and instead labelled by irreducible *irreps*, of $O_h^D$. $P$, any flavor numbers are good. For $\vec{P} \neq \vec{0}$, $J$ and the helicity, $\lambda$, are good quantum numbers and states are classified by the irreps Any flavor quantum numbers still good but, in parity *not* apart from for = components P is good quantum number [@Thomas:2011
 scale setting procedure wherE ${a_t = \frac{a_t m_\omega}{M_\OmEga^\MaThrm{Phys}}}$, Using the $\Omega$ bARyon Mass determined on these lAtticEs,, ANd thE PhYsicaL $\Omega$ bARyON MasS.

REdUceD sYMmEtry oF a fInite cuBic lattice {#Sec_SyMmetries}
==========================================

The sYMmEtry of a latTicE in a finite voLumE is redUcEd cOMpareD to That oF contiNUous spAce in an inFiNIte volUMe. Our imPLEmEntaTion, a spatially cubIC lATtice discretizAtion iN a CUbIC Box WitH periodic bOuNdary COnditioNS, hAS THe sYMmetry of a cube. the relevant SYmmEtry grOuP foR A systeM of haDrONs oVerall at resT is tHerefore tHe doubLE cover oF The octaHedral (Or cUbiC) groUP wItH paRiTY, $O_h^d$. foR a sYSteM “in-flighT” wItH overAll nON-ZERo moMenTum, $\vEc{P} \neQ \vec{0}$, the appropRiaTe syMMetRy is rEduceD furThEr to tHat of tHe *litTlE group* [@Moore:2005dw], $\teXtrm{lG}(\vec{P})$, the SubGrOup Of $o_h^D$ whICh leavEs $\vEc{P}$ InvariaNt[^1]. The spATiaLlY PERiOdic boundary conditIoNS QuAntize thE allowED mOmENta, $\vec{p} = \fRaC{2\pi}{l}(n,m,p)$, WHEre $L$ iS the SPaTial exteNt of thE LaTtIce in phYsIcal unItS anD $n,m,P$ are iNTegeRs; we wrIte this iN a comPAct notation as $\vEC{p} = [n,m,p]$ or $[n m p]$.

The COnSEQuENces Of tHis reduced sYmmeTRy foR scaTTeRinG Have bEen diScUSsED in detail in Refs. [@DudeK:2012gJ; @Dudek:2012Xn]. In bRief, at zero momEntum the coNTINuum spin, $j$, is nOT a GOod quantum numbEr and States are iNStead labElled By irreduCible reprESEntationS, *irRepS*, of $o_h^D$. pARiTy, $P$, and any releVANt flAvOr quantUm nUmbers aRe sTilL goOd. FOr $\Vec{P} \neq \veC{0}$, $J$ and the HeLiCiTy, $\LamBda$, arE Not good qUaNtuM nUmbErs anD States Are clAssiFiEd BY thE irreps OF $\tEXTrm{Lg}(\vEc{p})$. Any RelEvAnt flAvor QUanTum numbErs are stiLl gOOd buT, iN gEneral, pArity is *not* apaRt From for the $\LaMbdA = 0$ compoNENts where $\Tilde{\eta} \equiv P (-1)^J$ is a good qUAntum nuMbeR [@ThomAs:2011
 scale setting procedure w here ${a_t  = \f rac {a_ tm_\O mega }{m_\Omega^\ma t hrm{ phys}}}$, using the $\ Omega $b aryo n  m ass d etermin e do n  th es elat ti c es ,, an d t he phys ical $\Ome ga$  b aryon mass.Re duced symm etr y of a finit e c ubic l at tic e  {#se c_s ymmet ries}= ====== ========= == = ====== = ======= = = == ==== =

The symmetry o f  a lattice in a f initevo l um e isred uced compa re d tot hat ofc on t i n uou s  space in aninfinite vo l ume . Ourim ple m entati on, a  s p ati ally cubiclatt ice discr etizat i on in a cubic b ox wit h p eri odic bo un dar yc ond i ti ons ,  ha s the sy mm et ry of  a c u b e .  The  re leva nt sy mmetry groupfor  a s y ste m ofhadro ns o ve rallat res t isth erefore the dou blecover ofthe  o cta he dral( or cub ic)  gr oup wit h parit y , $ O_ h ^ D $.  For a system “in- fl i g ht ” with o verall no n- z ero mome nt um,  $\v e c {P} \ neq\ ve c{0}$, t he app r op ri ate sym me try is  r edu ced  furt h er t o that  of the*litt l e group* [@Moo r e:2005dw], $\ t ex t r m{ L G}(\ vec {P})$, thesubg r oupof $ O _h ^D$ which  leav es $\ v ec{P}$ invariant[^1 ].  The s patia lly periodicboundary c o n d itions q uant i ze the allowed mo menta , $\vec{p} = \frac{ 2\pi} {L}(n,m, p)$, wher e $L$ is t hespa tia l e x t en t of the latt i c e in  p hysical  un its and  $n ,m, p$are  i ntegers;we write  t hi sin  acompa c t notati on  as  $ \ve c{p}=  [n,m, p]$ o r $[ nmp ]$. 

The c o ns e q uenc es  o f th isre duced  sym m etr y for s cattering  ha v e be en  d iscusse d in detail i nRefs. [@Du de k:2 012gj; @ Dudek:20 12xn]. In brief, at zer o  moment umthe c onti nuum spin , $ J$, is  no t  a goo d quan tum n um ber a nd st a t es  ar einstead la b e lle d byir redu cible r epresentations, *i r rep s*, of $O_h^D $.Pari t y ,$P$ ,  a n d a ny rel e v ant flavor quan tum number sa re  still goo d . F or  $\vec{ P} \neq  \vec { 0}$, $J $ and the  helicity ,$\la m b da$ , are notgood qua ntum numb e rs an d  s tates  ar e clas si fie d bythe ir r eps  of $ \textr m{ LG}(\v ec{P} )$ . Any re levant flavor quantum n umbers  aresti ll good b ut, ingeneral,pari ty is *not * a par t fro m f o r the  $\l a mb da=  0$ c ompo n ents wher e  $ \ti l d e{ \eta} \equi v P  (- 1)^J$  is a good  qua ntum number [@Tho m as:2011
 scale_setting procedure_where ${a_t = \frac{a_t_m_\Omega}{m_\Omega^\mathrm{phys}}}$, using_the_$\Omega$ baryon_mass_determined on these_lattices,, and the_physical $\Omega$ baryon mass.

Reduced_symmetry of a_finite_cubic lattice {#sec_symmetries}
==========================================

The symmetry of a lattice in a finite volume is reduced compared_to_that of_continuous_space_in an infinite volume. Our_implementation, a spatially cubic lattice_discretization in_a cubic box with periodic boundary conditions, has_the_symmetry of a_cube. The relevant symmetry group for a system of_hadrons overall at rest is therefore_the double cover_of_the_octahedral (or cubic) group_with parity, $O_h^D$. For a system_“in-flight” with overall non-zero momentum, $\vec{P}_\neq \vec{0}$, the appropriate symmetry is reduced_further to that of the *little_group* [@Moore:2005dw], $\textrm{LG}(\vec{P})$, the subgroup of_$O_h^D$ which_leaves $\vec{P}$ invariant[^1]. The spatially_periodic boundary conditions_quantize the_allowed momenta, $\vec{p}_= \frac{2\pi}{L}(n,m,p)$, where $L$ is the_spatial extent of_the lattice in physical units and_$n,m,p$_are integers; we_write_this_in a_compact notation as_$\vec{p}_= [n,m,p]$_or_$[n m p]$.

The consequences of this_reduced_symmetry for scattering have been discussed in_detail in Refs. [@Dudek:2012gj; @Dudek:2012xn]._In_brief, at zero momentum_the continuum spin, $J$, is_not a good quantum number and_states are_instead labelled_by irreducible representations, *irreps*, of $O_h^D$. Parity, $P$, and any relevant_flavor quantum numbers are still good._For $\vec{P} \neq \vec{0}$,_$J$ and_the_helicity, $\lambda$, are_not_good quantum_numbers and states are classified by the_irreps of_$\textrm{LG}(\vec{P})$. Any relevant flavor quantum numbers_are still good but,_in_general, parity is *not* apart from_for the $\lambda = 0$ components_where $\tilde{\eta} \equiv P (-1)^J$_is_a_good quantum number [@Thomas:2011