 $A:=S(a,r)$ in $b$, where $r=ab$; 2) Conversely, if a sphere with center $a$ touches $H$ in a point $b$, then $b$ is the foot of $a$ on $H$.

For 1): Since $b$ is the foot of $a$, we have $ab' =r$ for all $b'\in H$ with $b'\sim b$, which is to say ${\mathfrak{M}}(b)\cap H \subseteq S(a,r)$, which as argued is the touching condition. – For 2), the assumption gives that ${\mathfrak{M}}(b) \cap H \subseteq A$, so all points $b'\in H$ with $b'\sim b$ have same distance to $a$, so $b$ is the foot of $a$ on $H$, by Proposition \[footx\] (the “conversely”-part).

\[perx\] If $A$ and $B$ are spheres with centres $a$ and $b$, respectively (with $a\# b$), then if $x$ and $y$ are in $A\cap B$, $\langle x-y, a-b \rangle =0$

Let $r$ and $s$ be the radii of the two spheres. Then we have $\langle (x-a), (x-a)\rangle =r^{2}$ and $\langle (x-b), (x-b)\rangle =s^{2}$, and similarly for $y$. Then $\langle x-y, a-b \rangle =0$ follows by simple arithmetic.

Since feet (orthogonal projections) are unique, it follows that a sphere can touch a hyperplane in at most one point; and furthermore, the touching set is focused, being of the form ${\mathfrak{M}}(b)\cap H$ for a hyperplane in $R^n  $, so is of the form $D(n-1)$. This proves the first assertion in

\[AHx\] In $R^n$, the touching of spheres with hyperplanes is focused. Also, the touching of two spheres (non-concentric in the sense that their centers are apart) is focused.

To prove the second assertion, let the spheres be $A$ and $C$, with centers ${\underline{a}}$ and ${\underline{c}}$, respectively (with ${\underline{a
$ A:=S(a, r)$ in $ b$, where $ r = ab$; 2) Conversely, if a sphere with center $ a$ touches $ H$ in a item $ b$, then $ b$ is the infantry of $ a$ on $ H$. 

 For 1 ): Since $ b$ is the foot of $ a$, we have $ ab' = r$ for all $ b'\in H$ with $ b'\sim b$, which is to allege $ { \mathfrak{M}}(b)\cap H \subseteq S(a, r)$, which as argued is the affecting condition. – For 2), the assumption gives that $ { \mathfrak{M}}(b) \cap H \subseteq A$, thus all points $ b'\in H$ with $ b'\sim b$ have like distance to $ a$, so $ b$ is the foot of $ a$ on $ H$, by Proposition \[footx\ ] (the “ conversely”-part). 

 \[perx\ ] If $ A$ and $ B$ are spheres with centres $ a$ and $ b$, respectively (with $ a\ # b$), then if $ x$ and $ y$ are in $ A\cap B$, $ \langle x - y, a - bel \rangle = 0 $ 

 Let $ r$ and $ s$ be the radius of the two spheres. Then we have $ \langle (ten - a), (x - a)\rangle = r^{2}$ and $ \langle (x - b), (x - b)\rangle = s^{2}$, and similarly for $ y$. Then $ \langle x - y, a - b \rangle = 0 $ be by simple arithmetic. 

 Since feet (orthogonal projections) are alone, it follows that a sphere can touch a hyperplane in at most one point; and furthermore, the affecting set is focused, being of the form $ { \mathfrak{M}}(b)\cap H$ for a hyperplane in $ R^n   $, so is of the form $ D(n-1)$. This proves the inaugural assertion in 

 \[AHx\ ] In $ R^n$, the touching of spheres with hyperplanes is focused. Also, the touching of two spheres (non - concentric in the sense that their centers are apart) is concentrate. 

 To prove the second assertion, lease the spheres be $ A$ and $ C$, with centers $ { \underline{a}}$ and $ { \underline{c}}$, respectively (with $ { \underline{a
 $A:=S(w,r)$ in $b$, where $r=ab$; 2) Convevsely, if a spherg qith cxnter $a$ touches $H$ in a point $b$, then $b$ is thx foit of $a$ on $H$.

For 1): Since $b$ is the foot of $a$, we havt $ab' =r$ for all $b'\ii H$ with $b'\sim g$, whieh is to say ${\matmfrak{M}}(b)\cap V \subseteq S(a,r)$, wfieh as argued is the touching conditijn. – For 2), hhe assumption givts ehat ${\mathfrak{M}}(b) \cap H \subseteq A$, so alm pointv $b'\in H$ with $n'\sim b$ have same distance ho $a$, so $b$ is the foot lf $a$ on $H$, bi Prjposition \[foogx\] (the “connzrsely”-part).

\[pgrx\] If $A$ and $B$ are spheres with zentrzs $a$ and $b$, tzwpefjively (with $e\# b$), thvn if $x$ and $y$ are in $D\cap B$, $\kangle x-y, a-b \rsngne =0$

Oet $r$ and $s$ be the ravii of the two sphergs. Then we hcve $\langle (x-a), (x-a)\ranglw =e^{2}$ and $\lancle (b-v), (x-c)\rahgke =s^{2}$, and sijilarly fod $y$. Then $\labgle x-y, a-b \rangle =0$ gojoows by simpls aritrmqtic.

Since feet (orthogonal projections) age uhique, it follows that a sphere can touch a hiperplane yn at most one point; and furthermore, the touching set ms foemfde, heing of the form ${\mathfrak{M}}(b)\cap H$ for a hyper[mame in $R^n  $, so is of the fork $F(n-1)$. Jhis proves thg first asaertion in

\[AHx\] In $R^j$, the tjuchibg of sphtres eith hyperplanes is focused. Also, the tolchibg of two spheres (uon-concentrie in tne semse that their centers cre apzrt) is focuded.

To probd the second assdrtpon, net the spheres be $A$ and $C$, with cenvers ${\bnderlind{a}}$ amd ${\undqrline{c}}$, redpectleely (with ${\underlinf{a
$A:=S(a,r)$ in $b$, where $r=ab$; 2) Conversely, sphere center $a$ $H$ in a the of $a$ on For 1): Since is the foot of $a$, we $ab' =r$ for all $b'\in H$ with $b'\sim b$, which is to say H \subseteq S(a,r)$, which as argued is the touching condition. – For 2), assumption that \cap \subseteq A$, so all points $b'\in H$ with $b'\sim b$ have same distance to $a$, so is the foot of $a$ on $H$, by \[footx\] (the “conversely”-part). \[perx\] $A$ and $B$ are spheres centres and $b$, (with b$), if $x$ and are in $A\cap B$, $\langle x-y, a-b \rangle =0$ Let $r$ and $s$ be the radii of two spheres. have $\langle (x-a)\rangle and (x-b), (x-b)\rangle =s^{2}$, for $y$. Then $\langle x-y, a-b by simple arithmetic. Since feet (orthogonal projections) are it follows a sphere can touch a hyperplane at most one point; and furthermore, the touching is focused, being of the form ${\mathfrak{M}}(b)\cap H$ for a hyperplane in $R^n $, so the form $D(n-1)$. This the first assertion \[AHx\] $R^n$, touching spheres with is focused. Also, the touching of two spheres (non-concentric in the that their centers are apart) is focused. To prove the let spheres be $A$ $C$, with centers ${\underline{a}}$ ${\underline{c}}$, (with ${\underline{a
 $A:=S(a,r)$ in $b$, where $r=ab$; 2) Conversely, If a sphere wIth ceNteR $a$ tOuChes $h$ in a Point $b$, then $b$ is tHE fooT of $a$ on $H$.

For 1): Since $b$ is the fOot of $A$, wE Have $AB' =r$ For alL $b'\in H$ wiTH $b'\SIM b$, wHiCh Is tO sAY ${\mAthfrAk{M}}(B)\cap H \suBseteq S(a,r)$, wHicH aS argued is the TOuChing condiTioN. – For 2), the assumPtiOn giveS tHat ${\MAthfrAk{M}}(B) \cap H \SubsetEQ A$, so alL points $b'\iN H$ WIth $b'\siM B$ have saME DiStanCe to $a$, so $b$ is the foot OF $a$ ON $H$, by PropositioN \[footx\] (ThE “CoNVErsEly”-Part).

\[perx\] If $a$ aNd $B$ arE Spheres WItH CENtrES $a$ and $b$, respectIvely (with $a\# b$), THen If $x$ and $Y$ aRe iN $a\cap B$, $\lAngle X-y, A-B \raNgle =0$

Let $r$ and $S$ be tHe radii of The two SPheres. THEn we havE $\langlE (x-a), (X-a)\rAnglE =R^{2}$ aNd $\LanGlE (X-b), (x-B)\RaNglE =S^{2}$, anD similarLy FoR $y$. TheN $\lanGLE X-Y, a-b \rAngLe =0$ foLlows By simple arithMetIc.

SiNCe fEet (orThogoNal pRoJectiOns) are UniquE, iT follows that a spHere Can touch a HypErPlaNe In at mOSt one pOinT; anD furtheRmore, thE TouChING SeT is focused, being of tHe FORm ${\Mathfrak{m}}(b)\cap H$ FOr A hYPerplane In $r^n  $, sO is oF THe forM $D(n-1)$. THIs Proves thE first ASsErTion in

\[Ahx\] in $R^n$, thE tOucHinG of spHEres With hyPerplaneS is foCUsed. Also, the touCHing of two spheREs (NON-cONcenTriC in the sense That THeir CentERs Are APart) iS focuSeD.

to PRove the second assertIoN, let thE spheRes be $A$ and $C$, witH centers ${\unDERLine{a}}$ and ${\UndeRLiNE{c}}$, respectively (With ${\uNderline{a
 $A:=S(a,r)$ in $b$, where  $r=ab$; 2 ) Con ver sel y,  ifa sp here with cent e r $a $ touches $H$ in a poi nt $b $, then $b $ isthe foo t  o f $a$  o n$H$ .Fo r 1):  Si nce $b$  is the fo otof  $a$, we hav e  $ ab' =r$ fo r a ll $b'\in H$  wi th $b' \s imb $, wh ich  is t o say$ {\math frak{M}}( b) \ cap H\ subsete q S( a,r) $, which as argue d  i s  the touchingcondit io n .– For  2) , the assu mp tiong ives th a t$ { \ mat h frak{M}}(b) \ cap H \subs e teq  A$, s oall points  $b'\ in H$with $b'\si m b$  have sam e dist a nce to$ a$, so$b$ is  th e f ooto f$a $ o n$ H$, by  Pr o pos ition \[ fo ot x\] ( the“ c o n vers ely ”-pa rt).
\[perx\] If$A$  and $B$  arespher es w it h cen tres $ a$ an d$b$, respective ly ( with $a\#  b$ ),  th en  if $ x $ and$y$  ar e in $A \cap B$ ,  $\ la n g l ex-y, a-b \rangle = 0$ Le t $r$ an d $s$b eth e  radii o fthe  two s phere s. T h en  we have  $\lan g le  ( x-a), ( x- a)\ran gl e = r^{ 2}$ a n d $\ langle  (x-b),(x-b) \ rangle =s^{2}$ ,  and similarl y  f o r  $ y $. T hen  $\langle x -y,a -b \ rang l e=0$ follo ws by  s i mp l e arithmetic.

Sinc efeet ( ortho gonal project ions) areu n i que, itfoll o ws that a spherecan t ouch a hyp e rplane i n atmost one  point; a n d  further mor e,the  to u c hi ng set is foc u s ed,be ing ofthe  form $ {\m ath fra k{M }} (b)\cap H $ for ahy pe rp la nein $R ^ n  $, so  i s o fthe  form $D(n-1 )$. T hispr ov e s t he firs t  a s s erti on  i n

\ [AH x\ ] In$R^n $ , t he touc hing of s phe r es w it hhyperpl anes is focus ed . Also, th etou chingo f  two sph eres (non-concentric in the sen sethatthei r centers  ar e apar t)i s focu sed.
To pr ov e t h e  seco n d  a sse rt ion, let t h e  sp heres  b e $A $ and $ C$, with centers $ { \un derline{a}}$and  ${\ u n de rli n e{ c }}$ ,r esp e c tively (with ${ \underline {a 
 $A:=S(a,r)$_in $b$,_where $r=ab$; 2) Conversely,_if a_sphere_with center_$a$_touches $H$ in_a point $b$,_then $b$ is the_foot of $a$_on_$H$.

For 1): Since $b$ is the foot of $a$, we have $ab' =r$ for_all_$b'\in H$_with_$b'\sim_b$, which is to say_${\mathfrak{M}}(b)\cap H \subseteq S(a,r)$, which_as argued_is the touching condition. – For 2), the_assumption_gives that ${\mathfrak{M}}(b)_\cap H \subseteq A$, so all points $b'\in H$_with $b'\sim b$ have same distance_to $a$, so_$b$_is_the foot of $a$_on $H$, by Proposition \[footx\] (the_“conversely”-part).

\[perx\] If $A$ and $B$ are_spheres with centres $a$ and $b$, respectively_(with $a\# b$), then if $x$_and $y$ are in $A\cap_B$, $\langle_x-y, a-b \rangle =0$

Let $r$_and $s$ be_the radii_of the two_spheres. Then we have $\langle (x-a),_(x-a)\rangle =r^{2}$ and_$\langle (x-b), (x-b)\rangle =s^{2}$, and similarly_for_$y$. Then $\langle_x-y,_a-b_\rangle =0$_follows by simple_arithmetic.

Since_feet (orthogonal_projections)_are unique, it follows that a_sphere_can touch a hyperplane in at most_one point; and furthermore,_the_touching set is focused,_being of the form ${\mathfrak{M}}(b)\cap_H$ for a hyperplane in $R^n_ $,_so is_of the form $D(n-1)$. This proves the first assertion in

\[AHx\] In_$R^n$, the touching of spheres with_hyperplanes is focused. Also,_the touching_of_two spheres (non-concentric_in_the sense_that their centers are apart) is focused.

To_prove the_second assertion, let the spheres be_$A$ and $C$, with_centers_${\underline{a}}$ and ${\underline{c}}$, respectively (with ${\underline{a