metry\_properties\]); note that if the noise $\xi(t)$ has time-reversal symmetry, the term $\propto \omega_1\omega_2(\omega_1+\omega_2)$ in the integrand in Eq. (\[eq:2nd\_moment\_weak\_noise\]) can be disregarded.

For weak noise $\xi(t)$, the leading contribution to the variance of $u$ comes from the second-order term $\propto \Xi_2$. To reveal a nonzero third-order noise correlator, in addition to the variance of $u$ one should measure the third cumulant of $u$, $$\begin{aligned}
\label{eq:3rd_u_cumulant}
&&\frac{\langle u^3\rangle - 3\langle u\rangle\langle u^2\rangle +2\langle u\rangle^3}{\langle u\rangle^3}
\approx -i\int d\omega_1d\omega_2\Xi_3^{(\Lambda)}(\omega_1,\omega_2)
\nonumber\\
&& \times\left[\Lambda^3 + \Lambda(\omega_1^2 + \omega_2^2 + \omega_1\omega_2) + i\omega_1\omega_2(\omega_1+\omega_2)\right].\end{aligned}$$ One can see that, in the case of weak $\delta$-correlated noise, Eqs. (\[eq:Lorentzian\_response\]) — (\[eq:moments\_delta\_corr\]) agree with Eqs. (\[eq:3rd\_order\_linear\_u\]) — (\[eq:3rd\_u\_cumulant\]). However, the results of this section are not limited to $\delta$-correlated noise.

Quantum formulation
===================

The above arguments can be immediately extended to the quantum regime, since the responses of quantum and classical harmonic oscillators to resonant modulation are the same. In the absence of coupling to a thermal reservoir, the Hamiltonian of the oscillator in a resonant field $F\cos\omega_Ft$ in the presence of weak classical frequency noise $\xi(t)$ is $$\label{eq:H_0}
H_0=\hbar [\omega_0+\xi(t)]a^{\dagger}a - qF\cos\omega_Ft,$$ where $a= (2\hbar\omega_0
metry\_properties\ ]); note that if the noise $ \xi(t)$ has time - transposition isotropy, the term $ \propto \omega_1\omega_2(\omega_1+\omega_2)$ in the integrand in Eq.   (\[eq:2nd\_moment\_weak\_noise\ ]) can be disregarded. 

 For fallible randomness $ \xi(t)$, the leading contribution to the variance of $ u$ comes from the second - holy order term $ \propto \Xi_2$. To reveal a nonzero third - ordering noise correlator, in addition to the variability of $ u$ one should measure the third cumulant of $ u$, $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 \label{eq:3rd_u_cumulant } 
 & & \frac{\langle u^3\rangle - 3\langle u\rangle\langle u^2\rangle +2\langle u\rangle^3}{\langle u\rangle^3 } 
 \approx -i\int d\omega_1d\omega_2\Xi_3^{(\Lambda)}(\omega_1,\omega_2) 
 \nonumber\\ 
 & & \times\left[\Lambda^3 + \Lambda(\omega_1 ^ 2 + \omega_2 ^ 2 + \omega_1\omega_2) + i\omega_1\omega_2(\omega_1+\omega_2)\right].\end{aligned}$$ One can see that, in the sheath of decrepit $ \delta$-correlated noise, Eqs.   (\[eq: Lorentzian\_response\ ]) — (\[eq: moments\_delta\_corr\ ]) match with Eqs.   (\[eq:3rd\_order\_linear\_u\ ]) — (\[eq:3rd\_u\_cumulant\ ]). However, the results of this section are not restrict to $ \delta$-correlated noise. 

 Quantum formulation 
 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 

 The above arguments can be immediately extend to the quantum regime, since the responses of quantum and classical consonant oscillators to evocative modulation are the same. In the absence of coupling to a thermal reservoir, the Hamiltonian of the oscillator in a resonant discipline $ F\cos\omega_Ft$ in the presence of weak classical frequency noise $ \xi(t)$ is $ $ \label{eq: H_0 } 
 H_0=\hbar [ \omega_0+\xi(t)]a^{\dagger}a - qF\cos\omega_Ft,$$ where $ a= (2\hbar\omega_0
metgy\_properties\]); note that in the noise $\xi(t)$ kqs timx-reverszl symmegry, the term $\propto \omega_1\omeja_2(\omwga_1+\omtya_2)$ in the integrand kn Eq. (\[eq:2nd\_loment\_weqk\_nomse\]) can be disrejzrded.

Fov weai noivx $\xi(t)$, the leadikg contribudion to the vasixnee of $u$ comes from the second-order tqrm $\proltl \Xi_2$. To reveal a npgzerk third-order noise correlator, in asdition to the variamce of $u$ one should measurf thf third cumulant ov $u$, $$\begin{alugneq}
\oabel{eq:3rd_u_cuoulant}
&&\frac{\langle u^3\rangme - 3\langle u\rangle\langle u^2\rangld +2\lanyle u\rangle^3}{\oabglf u\rangle^3}
\appcox -i\igt d\omega_1d\omcba_2\Xi_3^{(\Lakbda)}(\omeba_1,\omega_2)
\nonumbev\\
&& \timxs\ledt[\Lambda^3 + \Lambda(\omega_1^2 + \omega_2^2 + \omega_1\omegw_2) + i\omega_1\mmzga_2(\omega_1+\omega_2)\right].\end{qlugned}$$ One can wee thzt, ih the fasx of weak $\dslta$-correlared noise, Eqs. (\[eq:Loremtspsn\_response\]) — (\[sq:momegtf\_delta\_corr\]) agree with Eqs. (\[eq:3rd\_order\_lineag\_u\]) — (\[sq:3rd\_u\_cumulant\]). However, tye results of this seftion are not limited to $\delta$-correlated noise.

Quantum formglatikv
===================

Tht qbove qrhuments can be immediately extended to the quwhtim regime, since bhe responses of qiajtii and classicxl harmonjc oscillators to gesonanj moduoation art the same. In the absence of coupling to a tkernal reservoir, the Kamiltonian uf tne osvillator in a resonant yield $R\cos\omega_Ft$ in the pddsence of weak cuasxiwal frequency noise $\xi(t)$ is $$\label{eq:H_0}
I_0=\hbar [\omega_0+\xk(t)]a^{\dsgger}a - qF\cos\omeha_Ft,$$ where $a= (2\hbar\omega_0
metry\_properties\]); note that if the noise $\xi(t)$ symmetry, term $\propto in the integrand disregarded. weak noise $\xi(t)$, leading contribution to variance of $u$ comes from the term $\propto \Xi_2$. To reveal a nonzero third-order noise correlator, in addition to variance of $u$ one should measure the third cumulant of $u$, $$\begin{aligned} \label{eq:3rd_u_cumulant} u^3\rangle 3\langle u^2\rangle u\rangle^3}{\langle u\rangle^3} \approx -i\int d\omega_1d\omega_2\Xi_3^{(\Lambda)}(\omega_1,\omega_2) \nonumber\\ && \times\left[\Lambda^3 + \Lambda(\omega_1^2 + \omega_2^2 + \omega_1\omega_2) + i\omega_1\omega_2(\omega_1+\omega_2)\right].\end{aligned}$$ can see that, in the case of weak noise, Eqs. (\[eq:Lorentzian\_response\]) — agree with Eqs. (\[eq:3rd\_order\_linear\_u\]) — However, results of section not to $\delta$-correlated noise. formulation =================== The above arguments can be immediately extended to the quantum regime, since the responses of and classical to resonant are same. the absence of a thermal reservoir, the Hamiltonian of a resonant field $F\cos\omega_Ft$ in the presence of classical frequency $\xi(t)$ is $$\label{eq:H_0} H_0=\hbar [\omega_0+\xi(t)]a^{\dagger}a - where $a= (2\hbar\omega_0
metry\_properties\]); note that if The noise $\xi(T)$ has tIme-RevErSal sYmmeTry, the term $\propTO \omeGa_1\omega_2(\omega_1+\omega_2)$ in the IntegRaND in EQ. (\[Eq:2Nd\_momEnt\_weak\_NOiSE\]) Can Be DiSreGaRDeD.

For wEak Noise $\xi(T)$, the leadinG coNtRibution to thE VaRiance of $u$ cOmeS from the secoNd-oRder teRm $\ProPTo \Xi_2$. TO reVeal a NonzerO Third-oRder noise CoRRelatoR, In additION tO the Variance of $u$ one shoULd MEasure the third CumulaNt OF $u$, $$\BEGin{AliGned}
\label{eQ:3rD_u_cumULant}
&&\fraC{\LaNGLE u^3\rANgle - 3\langle u\raNgle\langle u^2\RAngLe +2\langLe U\raNGle^3}{\lanGle u\rAnGLe^3}
\aPprox -i\int d\oMega_1D\omega_2\Xi_3^{(\LAmbda)}(\oMEga_1,\omegA_2)
\NonumbeR\\
&& \times\LefT[\LaMbda^3 + \lAmBdA(\omEgA_1^2 + \OmeGA_2^2 + \oMegA_1\OmeGa_2) + i\omega_1\OmEgA_2(\omegA_1+\omeGA_2)\RIGht].\eNd{aLignEd}$$ One Can see that, in tHe cAse oF WeaK $\deltA$-corrElatEd Noise, eqs. (\[eq:LOrentZiAn\_response\]) — (\[eq:momEnts\_Delta\_corr\]) AgrEe WitH EQs. (\[eq:3rD\_Order\_lIneAr\_u\]) — (\[Eq:3rd\_u\_cuMulant\]). HOWevEr, THE ReSults of this section ArE NOt Limited tO $\delta$-COrReLAted noisE.

QUanTum fORMulatIon
===================

THE aBove arguMents cAN bE iMmediatElY extenDeD to The QuantUM regIme, sinCe the resPonseS Of quantum and clASsical harmoniC OsCILlATors To rEsonant moduLatiON are The sAMe. in tHE abseNce of CoUPlINg to a thermal reservoIr, The HamIltonIan of the oscilLator in a reSONAnt field $f\cos\OMeGA_Ft$ in the presenCe of wEak classicAL frequenCy noiSe $\xi(t)$ is $$\lAbel{eq:H_0}
H_0=\hBAR [\omega_0+\xi(T)]a^{\dAggEr}a - QF\cOS\OmEga_Ft,$$ where $a= (2\hbAR\OmegA_0
metry\_properties\]); note  that if t he no ise  $\ xi (t)$  has  time-reversal symm etry, the term $\propt o \om eg a _1\o m eg a_2(\ omega_1 + \o m e ga_ 2) $inth e  i ntegr and  in Eq.  (\[eq:2nd \_m om ent\_weak\_n o is e\]) can b e d isregarded.
Fo r weak  n ois e  $\xi (t) $, th e lead i ng con tribution  t o  the v a rianceo f  $ u$ c omes from the sec o nd - order term $\p ropto\X i _2 $ .  To  re veal a non ze ro th i rd-orde r  n o i s e c o rrelator, inaddition to the  varia nc e o f  $u$ o ne sh ou l d m easure thethir d cumulan t of $ u $, $$\b e gin{ali gned}\la bel {eq: 3 rd _u _cu mu l ant } 
& &\f r ac{ \langleu^ 3\ rangl e -3 \ l a ngle  u\ rang le\la ngle u^2\rang le+2\l a ngl e u\r angle ^3}{ \l angle  u\ran gle^3 }\approx -i\intd\om ega_1d\om ega _2 \Xi _3 ^{(\L a mbda)} (\o meg a_1,\om ega_2)\ non um b e r \\ 
&& \times\left[\L am b d a^ 3 + \Lam bda(\o m eg a_ 1 ^2 + \om eg a_2 ^2 + \ omega _1\o m eg a_2) + i \omega _ 1\ om ega_2(\ om ega_1+ \o meg a_2 )\rig h t].\ end{al igned}$$  Onec an see that, i n  the case ofw ea k $\ d elta $-c orrelated n oise ,  Eqs . (\ [ eq :Lo r entzi an\_r es p on s e\]) — (\[eq:moment s\ _delta \_cor r\]) agree wi th Eqs. (\ [ e q :3rd\_or der\ _ li n ear\_u\]) — (\ [eq:3 rd\_u\_cum u lant\]).  Howe ver, the  resultso f  this se cti onare  no t li mited to $\de l t a$-c or related  no ise.

Q uan tum  fo rmu la tion
==== ======== == == == =
Th e abo v e argume nt s c an  be  imme d iately  exte nded  t ot hequantum re g i me,si nc e th e r es ponse s of qua ntum an d classic alh armo ni coscilla tors to reson an t modulati on  ar e thes a me. In t he absence of couplingt o a the rma l res ervo ir, the H ami ltonia n o f  the o scilla tor i na r e s onant f ie ld$F \cos\omega _ F t$in th epres ence of  weak classical fr e que ncy noise $\x i(t )$ i s $$ \la b el { eq: H_ 0 }
H _ 0 =\hbar [\omega_ 0+\xi(t)]a ^{ \ da gger}a - q F \co s\ omega_F t,$$ wh ere $ a = (2\hb ar\omega_ 0
metry\_properties\]); note_that if_the noise $\xi(t)$ has_time-reversal symmetry,_the_term $\propto_\omega_1\omega_2(\omega_1+\omega_2)$_in the integrand_in Eq. (\[eq:2nd\_moment\_weak\_noise\]) can_be disregarded.

For weak noise_$\xi(t)$, the leading_contribution_to the variance of $u$ comes from the second-order term $\propto \Xi_2$. To reveal_a_nonzero third-order_noise_correlator,_in addition to the variance_of $u$ one should measure_the third_cumulant of $u$, $$\begin{aligned}
\label{eq:3rd_u_cumulant}
&&\frac{\langle u^3\rangle - 3\langle u\rangle\langle_u^2\rangle_+2\langle u\rangle^3}{\langle u\rangle^3}
\approx_-i\int d\omega_1d\omega_2\Xi_3^{(\Lambda)}(\omega_1,\omega_2)
\nonumber\\
&& \times\left[\Lambda^3 + \Lambda(\omega_1^2 + \omega_2^2 + \omega_1\omega_2)_+ i\omega_1\omega_2(\omega_1+\omega_2)\right].\end{aligned}$$ One can see that,_in the case_of_weak_$\delta$-correlated noise, Eqs. (\[eq:Lorentzian\_response\]) —_(\[eq:moments\_delta\_corr\]) agree with Eqs. (\[eq:3rd\_order\_linear\_u\]) — (\[eq:3rd\_u\_cumulant\])._However, the results of this section_are not limited to $\delta$-correlated noise.

Quantum formulation
===================

The_above arguments can be immediately extended_to the quantum regime, since_the responses_of quantum and classical harmonic_oscillators to resonant_modulation are_the same. In_the absence of coupling to a_thermal reservoir, the_Hamiltonian of the oscillator in a_resonant_field $F\cos\omega_Ft$ in_the_presence_of weak_classical frequency noise_$\xi(t)$_is $$\label{eq:H_0}
H_0=\hbar_[\omega_0+\xi(t)]a^{\dagger}a_- qF\cos\omega_Ft,$$ where $a= (2\hbar\omega_0