 vertices.

Pairwise beta model
-------------------

The tilted Dirichlet model has been successfully used for applications [e.g. @coles1991], although it suffers from a lack of interpretability of the parameters. @cooley2010 proposed a similar model but with easily interpretable parameters. The definition of their model is based on a geometric approach. Specifically, they considered the symmetric pairwise beta function $$\begin{aligned}
h^*(w_i,w_j) = \frac{\Gamma( 2 \beta_{i,j} )}{\Gamma^2( \beta_{i,j} )}
\bigg( \frac{w_i}{w_i + w_j} \bigg)^{\beta_{i,j}-1}
\bigg( \frac{w_j}{w_i + w_j} \bigg)^{\beta_{i,j}-1},i,j\in I,\end{aligned}$$ where $w_i$ and $w_j$ are two elements of ${{\boldsymbol w}}$ and $\beta_{i,j}>0$. This function has its center at the point $(1/d,\ldots,1/d)$ and it verifies the first moment conditions. Then, the angular pairwise beta density is defined by summing together all the $d(d-1)/2$ possible pairs of variables, namely $$\begin{aligned}
h ( {{\boldsymbol w}};{{\boldsymbol \theta}}) = \frac{2 ( d-3 )!\Gamma ( \alpha d +1 )}{d (d-1)\Gamma ( 2\alpha +1 )\Gamma \{ \alpha (d-2) \}}
\sum_{i,j\in I,i<j} 
h(w_i,w_j), \quad {{\boldsymbol w}}\in \sW,\end{aligned}$$ where $$h(w_i,w_j)=(w_i+w_j)^{2\alpha-1}\{1-(w_i+w_j)\}^{\alpha(d-2)-d+2}\,h^*( w_i,w_j)$$ and ${{\boldsymbol \theta}}=(\alpha,\{\beta_{i,j}\}_{i,j\in I})$ with $\alpha>0$. Each parameter $\beta_{i,j}$ controls the level of dependence between the $i^{th}$ and the $j^{th}$ components and the dependence increases for increasing values
vertices. 

 Pairwise beta model 
 ------------------- 

 The tilted Dirichlet model has been successfully used for application [ for example @coles1991 ], although it suffers from a lack of interpretability of the parameters. @cooley2010 aim a like model but with easily explainable parameters. The definition of their model is based on a geometric access. Specifically, they considered the symmetric pairwise beta routine $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 h^*(w_i, w_j) = \frac{\Gamma (2 \beta_{i, j }) } { \Gamma^2 (\beta_{i, j }) } 
 \bigg (\frac{w_i}{w_i + w_j } \bigg)^{\beta_{i, j}-1 } 
 \bigg (\frac{w_j}{w_i + w_j } \bigg)^{\beta_{i, j}-1},i, j\in I,\end{aligned}$$ where $ w_i$ and $ w_j$ are two elements of $ { { \boldsymbol w}}$ and $ \beta_{i, j}>0$. This routine experience its center at the point $ (1 / d,\ldots,1 / d)$ and it verifies the inaugural moment conditions. Then, the angular pairwise beta density is define by summing together all the $ d(d-1)/2 $ possible pairs of variable, namely $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 h ({ { \boldsymbol w}};{{\boldsymbol \theta } }) = \frac{2 (d-3)! \Gamma (\alpha d +1) } { d (d-1)\Gamma (2\alpha +1) \Gamma \ { \alpha (d-2) \ } } 
 \sum_{i, j\in I, i < j } 
 h(w_i, w_j), \quad { { \boldsymbol w}}\in \sW,\end{aligned}$$ where $ $ h(w_i, w_j)=(w_i+w_j)^{2\alpha-1}\{1-(w_i+w_j)\}^{\alpha(d-2)-d+2}\,h^ * (w_i, w_j)$$ and $ { { \boldsymbol \theta}}=(\alpha,\{\beta_{i, j}\}_{i, j\in I})$ with $ \alpha>0$. Each parameter $ \beta_{i, j}$ controls the level of dependence between the $ i^{th}$ and the $ j^{th}$ component and the dependence increases for increasing values
 vegtices.

Pairwise beta modeu
-------------------

The tilted Dirnxhlet kodel gas been successfully used for appliratiins [e.t. @coles1991], although it suwfers frol a lack of mnterpretability of the icramefcrs. @cmiley2010 proposed s similar kodel but with exsnly interpretable parameters. The defynition ov their model ys bsfed kn a geometric approach. Specificalmy, they considered tne symmetric pairwise beta funftion $$\begin{aligned}
j^*(w_i,w_j) = \frac{\Tammw( 2 \beta_{i,j} )}{\Gamoa^2( \beta_{i,j} )}
\bigg( \frac{w_i}{w_j + w_j} \bigg)^{\beta_{i,j}-1}
\bigg( \frac{w_j}{w_i + d_j} \biyg)^{\beta_{i,j}-1},i,j\ib U,\enf{dligned}$$ whece $w_i$ wnd $w_j$ are two elemetts of ${{\noldsymbol w}}$ akd $\beva_{i,j}>0$. This function has itv center at the poynt $(1/d,\ldotv,1/d)$ and it verifies rhw firvt mmmeng covdiuiois. Fhen, tje engular paidwise beta eensity is defined ny wumming togetger alj ehe $d(d-1)/2$ possible pairs of variables, nameny $$\gegin{aligned}
h ( {{\boldsymbil w}};{{\boldsymbol \theta}}) = \frac{2 ( d-3 )!\Damma ( \alpha d +1 )}{d (d-1)\Gamma ( 2\alpha +1 )\Gamma \{ \alpha (d-2) \}}
\sgm_{i,j\ii K,i<j} 
h(r_k,q_j), \quad {{\boldsymbol w}}\in \sW,\end{aligned}$$ where $$h(w_i,w_j)=(r_j+w_k)^{2\akpha-1}\{1-(w_i+w_j)\}^{\alpha(d-2)-b+2}\,h^*( w_i,w_j)$$ and ${{\boldxylbpj \theta}}=(\alpha,\{\bgta_{i,j}\}_{i,j\nh J})$ with $\alpha>0$. Each oarametgr $\betq_{i,j}$ contrjls yhe level of dependence betqeen the $i^{th}$ qnd the $j^{th}$ componznts and the depgndencr increases for increasnng vamues
vertices. Pairwise beta model ------------------- The tilted has successfully used applications [e.g. @coles1991], lack interpretability of the @cooley2010 proposed a model but with easily interpretable parameters. definition of their model is based on a geometric approach. Specifically, they considered symmetric pairwise beta function $$\begin{aligned} h^*(w_i,w_j) = \frac{\Gamma( 2 \beta_{i,j} )}{\Gamma^2( \beta_{i,j} )} \frac{w_i}{w_i w_j} \bigg( + w_j} \bigg)^{\beta_{i,j}-1},i,j\in I,\end{aligned}$$ where $w_i$ and $w_j$ are two elements of ${{\boldsymbol w}}$ and $\beta_{i,j}>0$. function has its center at the point $(1/d,\ldots,1/d)$ it verifies the first conditions. Then, the angular pairwise density defined by together the possible pairs of namely $$\begin{aligned} h ( {{\boldsymbol w}};{{\boldsymbol \theta}}) = \frac{2 ( d-3 )!\Gamma ( \alpha d +1 )}{d ( 2\alpha \{ \alpha \}} I,i<j} \quad {{\boldsymbol w}}\in $$h(w_i,w_j)=(w_i+w_j)^{2\alpha-1}\{1-(w_i+w_j)\}^{\alpha(d-2)-d+2}\,h^*( w_i,w_j)$$ and ${{\boldsymbol \theta}}=(\alpha,\{\beta_{i,j}\}_{i,j\in I})$ parameter $\beta_{i,j}$ controls the level of dependence between $i^{th}$ and $j^{th}$ components and the dependence increases increasing values
 vertices.

Pairwise beta model
-------------------

the tilted DIrichLet ModEl Has bEen sUccessfully useD For aPplications [e.g. @coles1991], althOugh iT sUFferS FrOm a laCk of intERpRETabIlItY of ThE PaRametErs. @Cooley2010 pRoposed a siMilAr Model but with EAsIly interprEtaBle parameterS. ThE definItIon OF theiR moDel is Based oN A geomeTric approAcH. specifICally, thEY CoNsidEred the symmetric pAIrWIse beta functioN $$\begin{AlIGnED}
H^*(w_i,W_j) = \fRac{\Gamma( 2 \beTa_{I,j} )}{\GamMA^2( \beta_{i,j} )}
\BIgG( \FRAc{w_I}{W_i + w_j} \bigg)^{\beta_{i,J}-1}
\bigg( \frac{w_j}{W_I + w_j} \Bigg)^{\beTa_{I,j}-1},i,J\In I,\end{AlignEd}$$ WHerE $w_i$ and $w_j$ are Two eLements of ${{\BoldsyMBol w}}$ and $\BEta_{i,j}>0$. ThIs funcTioN haS its CEnTeR at ThE PoiNT $(1/d,\LdoTS,1/d)$ aNd it veriFiEs The fiRst mOMENT conDitIons. then, tHe angular pairWisE betA DenSity iS defiNed bY sUmminG togetHer alL tHe $d(d-1)/2$ possible paiRs of Variables, NamElY $$\beGiN{aligNEd}
h ( {{\bolDsyMboL w}};{{\boldsYmbol \thETa}}) = \fRaC{2 ( D-3 )!\gAmMa ( \alpha d +1 )}{d (d-1)\Gamma ( 2\alpHa +1 )\gAMmA \{ \alpha (d-2) \}}
\sUm_{i,j\in i,I<j} 
H(w_I,W_j), \quad {{\boLdSymBol w}}\IN \SW,\end{AligNEd}$$ Where $$h(w_i,W_j)=(w_i+w_j)^{2\ALpHa-1}\{1-(W_i+w_j)\}^{\alpHa(D-2)-d+2}\,h^*( w_i,w_J)$$ aNd ${{\bOldSymboL \ThetA}}=(\alpha,\{\Beta_{i,j}\}_{i,j\In I})$ wiTH $\alpha>0$. Each paraMEter $\beta_{i,j}$ conTRoLS ThE LeveL of Dependence bEtweEN the $I^{th}$ aND tHe $j^{TH}$ compOnentS aND tHE dependence increaseS fOr incrEasinG values
 vertices.

Pairwise betamodel
---- ----- --- --- -- --
Thetilted Dirichl e t mo del has been successfu lly u se d  for ap plica tions [ e .g . @co le s1 991 ], al thoug h i t suffe rs from alac kof interpret a bi lity of th e p arameters. @ coo ley201 0pro p oseda s imila r mode l  but w ith easil yi nterpr e table p a r am eter s. The definition of their model is  based  o n  a g eom etr ic approac h.  Spec i fically ,  t h e y  co n sidered the s ymmetric pa i rwi se bet afun c tion $ $\beg in { ali gned}
h^*(w _i,w _j) = \fr ac{\Ga m ma( 2 \ b eta_{i, j} )}{ \Ga mma ^2(\ be ta _{i ,j }  )} \b igg (  \f rac{w_i} {w _i  + w_ j} \ b i g g )^{\ bet a_{i ,j}-1 }
\bigg( \fra c{w _j}{ w _i+ w_j } \bi gg)^ {\ beta_ {i,j}- 1},i, j\ in I,\end{align ed}$ $ where $ w_i $and  $ w_j$a re two  el eme nts of${{\bol d sym bo l w }} $ and $\beta_{i,j} >0 $ .  T his func tion h a sit s  centerat  th e po i n t $(1 /d,\ l do ts,1/d)$  and i t  v er ifies t he  first  m ome ntcondi t ions . Then , the an gular pairwise betad ensity is def i ne d by summ ing  together a ll t h e $d (d-1 ) /2 $ p o ssibl e pai rs of variables, namely $ $\ begin{ align ed}
h ( {{\bo ldsymbol w } } ; {{\bolds ymbo l  \ t heta}}) = \fra c{2 (  d-3 )!\Ga m ma ( \al pha d  +1 )}{d  (d-1)\Ga m m a ( 2\al pha  +1  )\ Gam m a  \ { \alpha (d-2 ) \}}\s um_{i,j \in  I,i<j}  
h (w_ i,w _j) ,\quad {{\ boldsymb ol  w }} \i n \ sW,\e n d{aligne d} $$wh ere  $$h( w _i,w_j )=(w_ i+w_ j) ^{ 2 \al pha-1}\ { 1- ( w _i+w _j )\ }^{\ alp ha (d-2) -d+2 } \,h ^*( w_i ,w_j)$$ a nd$ {{\b ol ds ymbol \ theta}}=(\alp ha ,\{\beta_{ i, j}\ }_{i,j \ i n I})$ w ith $\alpha>0$. Each pa r ameter$\b eta_{ i,j} $ control s t he lev elo f depe ndence  betw ee n t h e  $i^{ t h }$  an dthe $j^{th } $  co mpone nt s an d the d ependence increase s  fo r increasingval ues
 vertices.

Pairwise_beta model
-------------------

The_tilted Dirichlet model has_been successfully_used_for applications_[e.g._@coles1991], although it_suffers from a_lack of interpretability of_the parameters. @cooley2010_proposed_a similar model but with easily interpretable parameters. The definition of their model is_based_on a_geometric_approach._Specifically, they considered the symmetric_pairwise beta function $$\begin{aligned}
h^*(w_i,w_j) =_\frac{\Gamma( 2_\beta_{i,j} )}{\Gamma^2( \beta_{i,j} )}
\bigg( \frac{w_i}{w_i + w_j} \bigg)^{\beta_{i,j}-1}
\bigg(_\frac{w_j}{w_i_+ w_j} \bigg)^{\beta_{i,j}-1},i,j\in_I,\end{aligned}$$ where $w_i$ and $w_j$ are two elements of_${{\boldsymbol w}}$ and $\beta_{i,j}>0$. This function_has its center_at_the_point $(1/d,\ldots,1/d)$ and it_verifies the first moment conditions. Then,_the angular pairwise beta density is_defined by summing together all the $d(d-1)/2$_possible pairs of variables, namely $$\begin{aligned}
h_( {{\boldsymbol w}};{{\boldsymbol \theta}}) =_\frac{2 (_d-3 )!\Gamma ( \alpha d_+1 )}{d (d-1)\Gamma_( 2\alpha_+1 )\Gamma \{_\alpha (d-2) \}}
\sum_{i,j\in I,i<j} 
h(w_i,w_j), \quad_{{\boldsymbol w}}\in \sW,\end{aligned}$$_where $$h(w_i,w_j)=(w_i+w_j)^{2\alpha-1}\{1-(w_i+w_j)\}^{\alpha(d-2)-d+2}\,h^*( w_i,w_j)$$ and ${{\boldsymbol \theta}}=(\alpha,\{\beta_{i,j}\}_{i,j\in_I})$_with $\alpha>0$. Each_parameter_$\beta_{i,j}$_controls the_level of dependence_between_the $i^{th}$_and_the $j^{th}$ components and the dependence_increases_for increasing values