 $H=0.8$ (surface 3, blue line). Note that we include one decade roll-off region, from $q=10^3 \ {\rm m}^{-1}$ to $q=10^4 \ {\rm m}^{-1}$. We assume the effective Young’s modulus $E^*=1.33 \ {\rm GPa}$ and the radius of the cylinder $R=1 \ {\rm cm}$. We vary the applied pressure $f_{\rm N}$ from $10^3 \ {\rm N/m}$ to $1.5\times 10^6 \ {\rm N/m}$. This gives a variation in $\alpha = h_{\rm rms}/\delta$ with more than 3 decades.

Fig. \[1x.2p.Hertz.and.Roughness.eps\] shows the contact pressure $p(x)$ as a function of the coordinate $x$ for the rigid cylinder squeezed against an elastic half space with the force $f_{\rm N} = 10 \ {\rm kN/m}$. The dashed line is for perfectly smooth surfaces (Hertz contact), and the solid line for the substrate surface 1 with the surface roughness power spectrum given in Fig. \[1logq.2logC.eps\] (red line). Note that the surface roughness reduces the maximal contact pressure and makes the pressure profile Gaussian-like, but it becomes a perfect Gaussian only for much larger values of the parameter $\alpha$ (corresponding to smaller applied force $f_{\rm N}$ or larger rms-roughness amplitude $h_{\rm rms}$).

Fig. \[1logAlpha.2ratioArea.eps\] shows the ratio $w/s$ between the full-width-at-half-maximum (FWHM) and the standard deviation $s$ as a function of the logarithm of the dimensionless number $\alpha = h_{\rm rms}/\delta = (\pi/4) (h_{\rm rms} E^*/ f_{\rm N})$. In the calculation we have used the three power spectra shown in Fig. \[1logq.2logC.eps\] and varied the loading force $f_{\rm N}$ (between $10^3 \ {\rm N/m}$ and $1.5\times 10^6 \ {\rm N/m}$). Note that as a function of $\alpha$ the ratio $w/s$ is nearly the same for all three surfaces. This suggest that
$ H=0.8 $ (surface 3, blue line). Note that we admit one ten scroll - off region, from $ q=10 ^ 3 \ { \rm m}^{-1}$ to $ q=10 ^ 4 \ { \rm m}^{-1}$. We wear the effective Young ’s modulus $ E^*=1.33 \ { \rm GPa}$ and the spoke of the cylinder $ R=1 \ { \rm cm}$. We vary the applied pressure $ f_{\rm N}$ from $ 10 ^ 3 \ { \rm N / m}$ to $ 1.5\times 10 ^ 6 \ { \rm N / m}$. This give a variation in $ \alpha = h_{\rm rms}/\delta$ with more than 3 decades. 

 Fig. \[1x.2p. Hertz.and. Roughness.eps\ ] read the contact pressure $ p(x)$ as a routine of the coordinate $ x$ for the rigid cylinder squeezed against an elastic one-half space with the force $ f_{\rm N } = 10 \ { \rm kN / m}$. The dashed line is for perfectly smooth surfaces (Hertz liaison), and the solid line for the substrate surface 1 with the airfoil roughness power spectrum give in Fig. \[1logq.2logC.eps\ ] (crimson line). notice that the surface roughness reduces the maximal contact imperativeness and makes the pressure profile Gaussian - like, but it becomes a perfect Gaussian only for a lot bigger values of the parameter $ \alpha$ (corresponding to smaller applied force $ f_{\rm N}$ or larger rms - roughness amplitude $ h_{\rm rms}$). 

 Fig. \[1logAlpha.2ratioArea.eps\ ] shows the proportion $ tungsten / s$ between the full - width - at - one-half - maximal (FWHM) and the standard deviation $ s$ as a function of the logarithm of the dimensionless number $ \alpha = h_{\rm rms}/\delta = (\pi/4) (h_{\rm rms } E^*/ f_{\rm N})$. In the calculation we have used the three office spectrum shown in Fig. \[1logq.2logC.eps\ ] and varied the cargo force $ f_{\rm N}$ (between $ 10 ^ 3 \ { \rm N / m}$ and $ 1.5\times 10 ^ 6 \ { \rm N / m}$). Note that as a function of $ \alpha$ the ratio $ w / s$ is nearly the like for all three surfaces. This suggest that
 $H=0.8$ (durface 3, blue line). Note uhat we include ouw decave roll-kff regiun, from $q=10^3 \ {\rm m}^{-1}$ to $q=10^4 \ {\rm m}^{-1}$. Wx aswume uke effective Young’s oodulus $E^*=1.33 \ {\rm GPa}$ and rhe radius of the gvlindsv $R=1 \ {\xm cm}$. We vary thg applied prassure $f_{\rm N}$ fsoo $10^3 \ {\rm N/m}$ to $1.5\times 10^6 \ {\rm N/m}$. This gives a varistlon in $\alpha = r_{\rm gmf}/\delfa$ with more than 3 decades.

Fig. \[1x.2p.Hedtz.and.Rmughness.eps\] snows the contact pressure $o(x)$ ad a function of thf coordinatg $x$ sir the rigid cylinder squeezed agajnst an elastic half space with the yorce $f_{\rm N} = 10 \ {\rl kN/m}$. The dawhed jine is for ivrfectlf smootn surfaces (Herbz coitacr), and the solid line hor the substrate sutface 1 witv che surface roughness piwer vpecdrum tivdn jn Fjg. \[1loge.2lojC.eps\] (red ljne). Note thqt the surface rougnnqws reduces ths maxiiaj contact pressure and makes the pressuge pdofile Gaussian-like, but it becomes a perfect Gaussian only for much larger values of the parameter $\alpva$ (cocrdspinqkbg to smaller applied force $f_{\rm N}$ or larger rms-wkubhkess amplitude $h_{\vm rms}$).

Fig. \[1logAlpha.2tahipWrea.eps\] shows the rcfik $w/s$ between the fkll-widtr-at-haof-maximum (FWHK) and the standard deviatiob $s$ as a funbtiob of the logarithm of the dimznsionkess mumber $\alpha = h_{\rm rms}/\deuta = (\pi/4) (h_{\rm rms} E^*/ f_{\rm N})$. Jv the calculatiov wv haee used ufe three power spqctra shoxn in Fig. \[1loeq.2lobC.eps\] wnd varied the loading force $f_{\rm N}$ (betwgen $10^3 \ {\sm N/m}$ and $1.5\himes 10^6 \ {\rm N/m}$). Note that as a fuirtion of $\alphs$ dhe ratio $w/f$ is kearly the same for all three surfaczs. Thir suggest nhat
$H=0.8$ (surface 3, blue line). Note that one roll-off region, $q=10^3 \ {\rm m}^{-1}$. assume the effective modulus $E^*=1.33 \ GPa}$ and the radius of the $R=1 \ {\rm cm}$. We vary the applied pressure $f_{\rm N}$ from $10^3 {\rm N/m}$ to $1.5\times 10^6 \ {\rm N/m}$. This gives a variation in = rms}/\delta$ more 3 decades. Fig. \[1x.2p.Hertz.and.Roughness.eps\] shows the contact pressure $p(x)$ as a function of the coordinate $x$ the rigid cylinder squeezed against an elastic half with the force $f_{\rm = 10 \ {\rm kN/m}$. dashed is for smooth (Hertz and the solid for the substrate surface 1 with the surface roughness power spectrum given in Fig. \[1logq.2logC.eps\] (red line). that the reduces the contact and the pressure profile it becomes a perfect Gaussian only values of the parameter $\alpha$ (corresponding to smaller force $f_{\rm or larger rms-roughness amplitude $h_{\rm rms}$). \[1logAlpha.2ratioArea.eps\] shows the ratio $w/s$ between the full-width-at-half-maximum and the standard deviation $s$ as a function of the logarithm of the dimensionless number h_{\rm rms}/\delta = (\pi/4) rms} E^*/ f_{\rm In calculation have the three spectra shown in Fig. \[1logq.2logC.eps\] and varied the loading force $f_{\rm (between $10^3 \ {\rm N/m}$ and $1.5\times 10^6 \ {\rm that a function of the ratio $w/s$ is the for all three surfaces. that
 $H=0.8$ (surface 3, blue line). Note that wE include onE decaDe rOll-OfF regIon, fRom $q=10^3 \ {\rm m}^{-1}$ to $q=10^4 \ {\rm m}^{-1}$. WE AssuMe the effective Young’s moDulus $e^*=1.33 \ {\rM gPa}$ aND tHe radIus of thE CyLINdeR $R=1 \ {\Rm Cm}$. WE vARy The apPliEd pressUre $f_{\rm N}$ froM $10^3 \ {\rm n/m}$ To $1.5\times 10^6 \ {\rm N/m}$. THIs Gives a variAtiOn in $\alpha = h_{\rm Rms}/\Delta$ wItH moRE than 3 DecAdes.

FIg. \[1x.2p.HeRTz.and.ROughness.ePs\] SHows thE Contact PREsSure $P(x)$ as a function of thE CoORdinate $x$ for the Rigid cYlINdER SquEezEd against aN eLastiC Half spaCE wITH The FOrce $f_{\rm N} = 10 \ {\rm kN/m}$. the dashed liNE is For perFeCtlY Smooth SurfaCeS (herTz contact), anD the Solid line For the SUbstratE Surface 1 With thE suRfaCe roUGhNeSs pOwER spECtRum GIveN in Fig. \[1loGq.2LoGC.eps\] (Red lINE). nOte tHat The sUrfacE roughness redUceS the MAxiMal coNtact PresSuRe and Makes tHe preSsUre profile GaussIan-lIke, but it bEcoMeS a pErFect GAUssian OnlY foR much laRger valUEs oF tHE PArAmeter $\alpha$ (correspOnDINg To smalleR appliED fOrCE $f_{\rm N}$ or lArGer Rms-rOUGhnesS ampLItUde $h_{\rm rmS}$).

Fig. \[1loGalPhA.2ratioAReA.eps\] shOwS thE raTio $w/s$ BEtweEn the fUll-width-At-halF-Maximum (FWHM) and THe standard devIAtION $s$ AS a fuNctIon of the logAritHM of tHe diMEnSioNLess nUmber $\AlPHa = H_{\Rm rms}/\delta = (\pi/4) (h_{\rm rms} E^*/ F_{\rM N})$. In thE calcUlation we have Used the thrEE POwer specTra sHOwN In Fig. \[1logq.2logC.ePs\] and Varied the lOAding forCe $f_{\rm n}$ (between $10^3 \ {\Rm N/m}$ and $1.5\tiMES 10^6 \ {\rm N/m}$). NotE thAt aS a fUncTIOn Of $\alpha$ the ratIO $W/s$ is NeArly the SamE for all ThrEe sUrfAceS. THis suggesT that
 $H=0.8$ (surface 3, blueline). Not e tha t w e i nc lude  one  decade roll-o f f re gion, from $q=10^3 \ { \rm m }^ { -1}$ to  $q=1 0^4 \ { \ rm m }^{ -1 }$ . W ea ss ume t heeffecti ve Young’s  mo du lus $E^*=1.3 3  \  {\rm GPa} $ a nd the radiu s o f thecy lin d er $R =1\ {\r m cm}$ .  We va ry the ap pl i ed pre s sure $f _ { \r m N} $ from $10^3 \ {\ r mN /m}$ to $1.5\t imes 1 0^ 6  \ { \rm  N/ m}$. Thisgi ves a variati o ni n $\a l pha = h_{\rmrms}/\delta $  wi th mor etha n  3 dec ades. 
F ig.  \[1x.2p.He rtz. and.Rough ness.e p s\] sho w s the c ontact  pr ess ure$ p( x) $ a sa  fu n ct ion ofthe coor di na te $x $ fo r t h e ri gid  cyl inder  squeezed aga ins t an ela stichalfspac ewiththe fo rce $ f_ {\rm N} = 10 \{\rm  kN/m}$.The  d ash ed  line is for  pe rfe ctly sm ooth su r fac es ( H er tz contact), and t he s ol id linefor th e  s ub s trate su rf ace  1 w i t h the  sur f ac e roughn ess po w er  s pectrum  g iven i nFig . \ [1log q .2lo gC.eps \] (redline) .  Note that the surface rough n es s re d uces  th e maximal c onta c t pr essu r eand makes  thepr e ss u re profile Gaussian -l ike, b ut it  becomes a pe rfect Gaus s i a n only f or m u ch larger valuesof th e paramete r  $\alpha $ (co rrespond ing to sm a l ler appl ied  fo rce  $f _ { \r m N}$ or larg e r  rms -r oughnes s a mplitud e $ h_{ \rm  rm s} $).

Fig.  \[1logA lp ha .2 ra tio Area. e ps\] sho ws  th erat io $w / s$ bet weenthefu ll - wid th-at-h a lf - m axim um  ( FWHM ) a nd  thestan d ard  deviat ion $s$ a s a func ti on  of the  logarithm of  t he dimensi on les s numb e r  $\alpha  = h_{\rm rms}/\delta = (\pi/4)  (h _{\rm  rms } E^*/ f_ {\r m N})$ . I n  the c alcula tionwe  ha v e  used t he  th re e power sp e c tra  show nin F ig. \[1 logq.2logC.eps\] a n d v aried the loa din g fo r c e$f_ { \r m  N} $( bet w e en $10^3 \ {\rm  N/m}$ and  $ 1 .5 \times 10^ 6  \{\ rm N/m} $). Not e tha t  as a f unction o f $\alpha $ther a tio  $w/s$ isnearly t he same f o r all th ree s urf aces.Th issugge st tha t 
 $H=0.8$_(surface 3,_blue line). Note that_we include_one_decade roll-off_region,_from $q=10^3 \_{\rm m}^{-1}$ to_$q=10^4 \ {\rm m}^{-1}$._We assume the_effective_Young’s modulus $E^*=1.33 \ {\rm GPa}$ and the radius of the cylinder $R=1 \_{\rm_cm}$. We_vary_the_applied pressure $f_{\rm N}$ from_$10^3 \ {\rm N/m}$ to_$1.5\times 10^6_\ {\rm N/m}$. This gives a variation in_$\alpha_= h_{\rm rms}/\delta$_with more than 3 decades.

Fig. \[1x.2p.Hertz.and.Roughness.eps\] shows the contact_pressure $p(x)$ as a function of_the coordinate $x$_for_the_rigid cylinder squeezed against_an elastic half space with the_force $f_{\rm N} = 10 \_{\rm kN/m}$. The dashed line is for_perfectly smooth surfaces (Hertz contact), and_the solid line for the_substrate surface_1 with the surface roughness_power spectrum given_in Fig._\[1logq.2logC.eps\] (red line)._Note that the surface roughness reduces_the maximal contact_pressure and makes the pressure profile_Gaussian-like,_but it becomes_a_perfect_Gaussian only_for much larger_values_of the_parameter_$\alpha$ (corresponding to smaller applied force_$f_{\rm_N}$ or larger rms-roughness amplitude $h_{\rm rms}$).

Fig._\[1logAlpha.2ratioArea.eps\] shows the ratio_$w/s$_between the full-width-at-half-maximum (FWHM)_and the standard deviation $s$_as a function of the logarithm_of the_dimensionless number_$\alpha = h_{\rm rms}/\delta = (\pi/4) (h_{\rm rms} E^*/ f_{\rm N})$._In the calculation we have used_the three power spectra_shown in_Fig._\[1logq.2logC.eps\] and varied_the_loading force_$f_{\rm N}$ (between $10^3 \ {\rm N/m}$_and $1.5\times_10^6 \ {\rm N/m}$). Note that_as a function of_$\alpha$_the ratio $w/s$ is nearly the_same for all three surfaces. This_suggest that