to-noise ratio reported with these refined positions to determine whether the burst could be a questionable detection. For a few dozen bursts, the signal-to-noise ratio associated with the refined positions found by this auto pipeline is lower than 7 (the typical image-trigger threshold). However, most of these cases are due to a long quiescent period of the burst emission before the spacecraft slews. We thus rerun the search for detections for these bursts using images created with the time interval and energy range determined by the flight software. If the signal-to-noise ratio is still below 7 and there is not an accompanying an XRT afterglows, we will mark it as a “tentative detection” in Table \[tab:summary\_general\]. The readers are advised to treat these bursts with special caution.

For spectral analysis, we use the commonly-adopted X-ray fitting package, XSPEC[^14]. When the spectrum covers time periods including spacecraft slew time, we generate multiple response files in this period in order to create an “average” response file for the whole period. [*Swift*]{} slews at a rate of $\sim$ 1 deg per second [@Markwardt07] and hence the telescope motion can be safely ignored within 5 seconds [@Sakamoto11_calibrate]. Therefore, we create a response file for each five seconds during slew time, and a response file for each time segment when the spacecraft is settled. We create an average response file for the whole time period using the HEASARC tool [*addrmf*]{}, with weighting factors equal to the fraction of photon counts in the specific time periods of each response file.

Following the BAT2 catalog, we fit the GRB spectra with two different models: simple power law (PL) and cutoff power law (CPL). The simple power-law model is described by the following equation, \[eq:PL\] f(E) = K\^[PL]{}\_[50]{} ( )\^[\^[PL]{}]{}, where f(E) is the photon flux at energy E, $\alpha^{\rm PL}$ is the PL index, and ${K^{PL}_{50} }$ is the normalization factor at 50 keV, with units of photons $\rm cm^{-2} \ s^{-1} \ keV^{-1}$. The cutoff power-law model is expressed as, \[eq:CPL\] f(E) = K\^[CPL]{}\_[50]{} ( )\^[\^[CPL]{}]{} (), where $\alpha^{\
to - noise ratio reported with these refined position to settle whether the burst could be a questionable detection. For a few dozen fusillade, the signal - to - noise ratio associate with the refined positions recover by this auto pipeline is low than 7 (the typical image - trigger threshold). However, most of these cases are due to a retentive quiescent period of the burst emission before the spacecraft slews. We therefore rerun the search for detections for these bursts practice images make with the time interval and energy range determined by the escape software. If the signal - to - noise ratio is still below 7 and there is not an accompanying an XRT afterglows, we will mark it as a “ tentative detection ” in Table \[tab: summary\_general\ ]. The readers are advised to treat these bursts with special caution. 

 For spectral analysis, we practice the normally - adopted X - ray adjustment package, XSPEC[^14 ]. When the spectrum covers time period including spacecraft slew time, we generate multiple reception files in this period in order to create an “ average ” response file for the hale period. [ * Swift * ] { } slews at a rate of $ \sim$ 1 deg per second [ @Markwardt07 ] and therefore the telescope motion can be safely neglect within 5 second [ @Sakamoto11_calibrate ]. Therefore, we create a response file for each five second during slew time, and a response file for each time section when the spacecraft is settled. We produce an average response file for the hale time period use the HEASARC tool [ * addrmf * ] { }, with weight factors equal to the fraction of photon counts in the specific time period of each response file. 

 Following the BAT2 catalog, we equip the GRB spectra with two unlike models: simple power police (PL) and cutoff power law (CPL). The simple power - jurisprudence model is described by the follow equation, \[eq: PL\ ] f(E) = K\^[PL]{}\_[50 ] { } () \^[\^[PL ] { } ] { }, where f(E) is the photon flux at energy E, $ \alpha^{\rm PL}$ is the PL index, and $ { K^{PL}_{50 } } $ is the normalization factor at 50 keV, with unit of photons $ \rm cm^{-2 } \ s^{-1 } \ keV^{-1}$. The cutoff power - law model is expressed as, \[eq: CPL\ ] f(E) = K\^[CPL]{}\_[50 ] { } () \^[\^[CPL ] { } ] { } (), where $ \alpha^{\
to-nlise ratio reported with these refined kowitionv to dstermine whether the burst could be e quwstiobable detection. For a wew dozen bursts, rhe wugnal-to-noise ratio assocjwted xith the refinec positionv found by thiv xuco pipeline is lower than 7 (the typicwl imagr-tgigger threshojd). Hpreved, most of these cases are due to a long qliescent period og the burst emission beforf thf spacecraft slews. We thus rethn eye search fof detections for these bursts using images created wigh thz time intetrql wtd energy renge dvtermined by bne flicht sofyware. If the slgnal-vo-nouse ratio is still benow 7 and there is got an acwojpanying an XRT adtwrglofs, wa wiuo mxrk iv aa a “tejtavive detectjon” in Tablw \[tab:summary\_general\]. Trv readers are advisqd to treat these bursts with special cauuion.

Fkr spectral analysis, we use the commonly-adopjed X-ray fytting package, XSPEC[^14]. When the spectrum covers tima permoas nkgludkbg spacecraft slew time, we generate multiple reflomsv files in this pcriod in order to vrfayg an “average” rgsponse fime for the whole pfriod. [*Srift*]{} wlews at w raye of $\sim$ 1 deg per second [@Mqrkwardt07] and yence the telescopz motion can be xafelu ignored within 5 seconbs [@Sakzmoto11_calibrwte]. Thererure, we create a fesionsa file for each five seconqs during slec time, avd a respogse file flr eagv time segment whej the s[acecraft ls settled. We create an average response file fmr nhe whole time period using the HEASARC tpol [*addxmf*]{}, wigh weightihg factmrs equal tj the fractiot of photon cmunts in the spexific tkoe periods of rach response file.

Fillowing the BAT2 cetaluf, we fit the GRY wpectra with twp dkffqrvnt mjgels: simple [owef lxe (PL) xnd cutoff iowdr lsw (CPL). The simple pofer-lzw model is descrineq by the followigg equation, \[ea:PL\] f(E) = K\^[PL]{}\_[50]{} ( )\^[\^[PL]{}]{}, whtre f(E) is the lhojon flux at energy E, $\alpha^{\rm PL}$ is the PP ikdex, and ${K^{PL}_{50} }$ is bhe gormalizatnon factor at 50 keV, with units of photons $\rm cm^{-2} \ s^{-1} \ keV^{-1}$. Thg cutoff power-law modgl ls expressed as, \[ez:CPL\] f(E) = N\^[CPL]{}\_[50]{} ( )\^[\^[CPL]{}]{} (), where $\alpya^{\
to-noise ratio reported with these refined positions whether burst could a questionable detection. the ratio associated with refined positions found this auto pipeline is lower than (the typical image-trigger threshold). However, most of these cases are due to a quiescent period of the burst emission before the spacecraft slews. We thus rerun search detections these using images created with the time interval and energy range determined by the flight software. If signal-to-noise ratio is still below 7 and there not an accompanying an afterglows, we will mark it a detection” in \[tab:summary\_general\]. readers advised to treat bursts with special caution. For spectral analysis, we use the commonly-adopted X-ray fitting package, XSPEC[^14]. When the covers time spacecraft slew we multiple files in this order to create an “average” response whole period. [*Swift*]{} slews at a rate of 1 deg second [@Markwardt07] and hence the telescope can be safely ignored within 5 seconds [@Sakamoto11_calibrate]. we create a response file for each five seconds during slew time, and a response each time segment when spacecraft is settled. create average file the whole period using the HEASARC tool [*addrmf*]{}, with weighting factors equal to fraction of photon counts in the specific time periods of file. the BAT2 catalog, fit the GRB spectra two models: simple power law cutoff law power-law is by the following equation, f(E) = K\^[PL]{}\_[50]{} ( )\^[\^[PL]{}]{}, f(E) is the photon PL}$ is the PL index, and ${K^{PL}_{50} }$ the normalization factor at 50 keV, with of photons $\rm cm^{-2} \ s^{-1} \ keV^{-1}$. The cutoff power-law model expressed as, = K\^[CPL]{}\_[50]{} ( )\^[\^[CPL]{}]{} (), where $\alpha^{\
to-noise ratio reported with tHese refineD posiTioNs tO dEterMine Whether the bursT CoulD be a questionable detectIon. FoR a FEw doZEn BurstS, the sigNAl-TO-NoiSe RaTio AsSOcIated WitH the refIned positiOns FoUnd by this autO PiPeline is loWer Than 7 (the typicAl iMage-trIgGer THreshOld). howevEr, most OF these Cases are dUe TO a long QUiescenT PErIod oF the burst emission BEfORe the spacecrafT slews. we THuS REruN thE search for DeTectiONs for thESe BURSts USing images creAted with the TIme IntervAl And ENergy rAnge dEtERmiNed by the fliGht sOftware. If The sigNAl-to-noiSE ratio iS still BelOw 7 aNd thERe Is Not An ACcoMPaNyiNG an xRT afterGlOwS, we wiLl maRK IT As a “tEntAtivE deteCtion” in Table \[tAb:sUmmaRY\_geNeral\]. the reAderS aRe advIsed to Treat ThEse bursts with spEciaL caution.

FOr sPeCtrAl AnalySIs, we usE thE coMmonly-aDopted X-RAy fItTING pAckage, XSPEC[^14]. When the SpECTrUm covers Time peRIoDs INcluding SpAceCrafT SLew tiMe, we GEnErate mulTiple rESpOnSe files In This peRiOd iN orDer to CReatE an “aveRage” respOnse fILe for the whole pERiod. [*Swift*]{} slewS At A RAtE Of $\siM$ 1 deG per second [@MArkwARdt07] aNd heNCe The TElescOpe moTiON cAN be safely ignored witHiN 5 seconDs [@SakAmoto11_calibratE]. Therefore, WE CReate a reSponSE fILe for each five sEcondS during sleW Time, and a RespoNse file fOr each timE SEgment whEn tHe sPacEcrAFT iS settled. We creATE an aVeRage resPonSe file fOr tHe wHolE tiMe Period usiNg the HEAsArC ToOl [*AddRmf*]{}, wiTH weightiNg FacToRs eQual tO The fraCtion Of phOtOn COunTs in the SPeCIFic tImE pErioDs oF eAch reSponSE fiLe.

FolloWing the BAt2 caTAlog, We FiT the GRB Spectra with twO dIfferent moDeLs: sImple pOWEr law (PL) aNd cutoff power law (CPL). The sIMple powEr-lAw modEl is Described By tHe follOwiNG equatIon, \[eq:Pl\] f(E) = K\^[Pl]{}\_[50]{} ( )\^[\^[Pl]{}]{}, whERE f(E) is THE pHotOn Flux at enerGY e, $\alPha^{\rm pL}$ Is thE PL indeX, and ${K^{PL}_{50} }$ is the normalIZatIon factor at 50 kev, wiTh unITS oF phOToNS $\rm Cm^{-2} \ S^{-1} \ KeV^{-1}$. tHE cutoff power-law Model is expReSSeD as, \[eq:CPL\] f(E) = k\^[cPL]{}\_[50]{} ( )\^[\^[cPl]{}]{} (), where $\aLpha^{\
to-noise ratio reported wi th these r efine d p osi ti onsto d etermine wheth e r th e burst could be a que stion ab l e de t ec tion.  For af ew d oze nbu rst s, th e sig nal -to-noi se ratio a sso ci ated with th e  r efined pos iti ons found by  th is aut opip e lineislower  than7  (thetypical i ma g e-trig g er thre s h ol d).However, most oft he s e cases are du e to a  l o ng q uie sce nt periodof  theb urst em i ss i o n  be f ore the space craft slews .  We  thusre run the se archfo r  de tections fo r th ese burst s usin g  images created  withthe  ti me i n te rv alan d  en e rg y r a nge  determi ne dby th e fl i g h t  sof twa re.If th e signal-to-n ois e ra t iois st ill b elow  7  andthereis no tan accompanying  anXRT after glo ws , w ewillm ark it  as  a“tentat ive det e cti on ” i nTable \[tab:summar y\ _ g en eral\].The re a de rs are advi se d t o tr e a t the se b u rs ts withspecia l  c au tion.
Fo r spec tr alana lysis ,  weuse th e common ly-ad o pted X-ray fit t ing package,X SP E C [^ 1 4].Whe n the spect rumc over s ti m eper i ods i nclud in g  s p acecraft slew time,  w e gene ratemultiple resp onse files i n  this pe riod in order to creat e an“average”r esponsefilefor thewhole per i o d. [*Swi ft* ]{}  sl ews a ta rate of $\s i m $ 1de g per s eco nd [@Ma rkw ard t07 ] a nd  hence th e telesc op emo ti oncan b e  safelyig nor ed  wi thin5  secon ds [@ Saka mo to 1 1_c alibrat e ]. T here fo re , we  cr ea te aresp o nse  file f or each f ive seco nd sduringslew time, an da response  f ile  for e a c h time s egment when the spacecr a ft is s ett led.We c reate anave rage r esp o nse fi le for  thewh ole t ime p e r io d u si ng the HEA S A RCtool[* addr mf*]{},  with weighting fa c tor s equal to th e f ract i o nofp ho t onco u nts i n the specifictime perio ds of  each resp o nse  f ile.

F ollowin g the BAT2 ca talog, we  fit theGR B sp e c tra  with twodifferen t models: simpl e  p owerlaw  (PL)an d c utoff  power law  (CPL ). The  s implepower -l aw model  is described by the fo llowin g equ ati on, \[eq: PL\ ]  f( E) = K\^[ PL]{ }\_[50]{}( ) \^[ \^[PL ]{} ] {}, w here f( E)i s the  pho t on flux a t  e ner g y  E , $\alpha^{ \ r m  PL }$ is  th e  PL in dex,  and ${K^{PL}_{50 }  }$ is the nor mali z a tio n f a ctor  a t 50 keV, with  un it s of photo ns  $\rm cm^{- 2} \ s^{ -1 }  \ ke V^{-1} $. The  cutoff p ow e r-lawmode l i s express edas ,  \[eq:C PL \] f(E) =  K\^ [C PL]{}\ _[50]{ }  ( ) \ ^ [\^[CPL]{}]{} () , whe r e  $\al p ha^ {\
to-noise ratio_reported with_these refined positions to_determine whether_the_burst could_be_a questionable detection._For a few_dozen bursts, the signal-to-noise_ratio associated with_the_refined positions found by this auto pipeline is lower than 7 (the typical image-trigger_threshold)._However, most_of_these_cases are due to a_long quiescent period of the_burst emission_before the spacecraft slews. We thus rerun the_search_for detections for_these bursts using images created with the time interval_and energy range determined by the_flight software. If_the_signal-to-noise_ratio is still below_7 and there is not an_accompanying an XRT afterglows, we will_mark it as a “tentative detection” in_Table \[tab:summary\_general\]. The readers are advised_to treat these bursts with_special caution.

For_spectral analysis, we use the_commonly-adopted X-ray fitting_package, XSPEC[^14]._When the spectrum_covers time periods including spacecraft slew_time, we generate_multiple response files in this period_in_order to create_an_“average”_response file_for the whole_period._[*Swift*]{} slews_at_a rate of $\sim$ 1 deg_per_second [@Markwardt07] and hence the telescope motion_can be safely ignored_within_5 seconds [@Sakamoto11_calibrate]. Therefore,_we create a response file_for each five seconds during slew_time, and_a response_file for each time segment when the spacecraft is settled. We_create an average response file for_the whole time period_using the_HEASARC_tool [*addrmf*]{}, with_weighting_factors equal_to the fraction of photon counts in_the specific_time periods of each response file.

Following_the BAT2 catalog, we_fit_the GRB spectra with two different_models: simple power law (PL) and_cutoff power law (CPL). The_simple_power-law_model is described by the_following equation, \[eq:PL\] f(E) = K\^[PL]{}\_[50]{}_( )\^[\^[PL]{}]{}, where_f(E) is the photon flux at energy_E,_$\alpha^{\rm PL}$ is the PL index,_and_${K^{PL}_{50} }$ is the normalization factor_at_50_keV, with units of photons_$\rm cm^{-2} \ s^{-1} \ keV^{-1}$._The cutoff power-law model is expressed as, \[eq:CPL\] f(E)_= K\^[CPL]{}\_[50]{} (_)\^[\^[CPL]{}]{} (), where $\alpha^{\