\frac{\tau_0+1-\tau}{\delta\tau}-\tanh\frac{\tau_0-\tau}{\delta\tau}\right),$$ where $\tau=t/\Delta\tau$, $\delta\tau$ is the duration of the pulse front and tail, and $\tau_0$ is the shift of the front relative to $t=0$. The values $\delta\tau=0.01$ and $\tau_0=0.5$ were taken for the simulations. The input signal at $f_2$ was supposed to be a continuous wave with $a_{20}~=~10^{-5}a_{30}$.

![\[fig4\] Optical parametric amplification and frequency-shifting NLO reflectivity vs. intensity of the pump.](fig4.eps){width=".98\columnwidth"}

Figure \[fig4\] demonstrates the dependence of the output amplified signal at $f_2$ and of the idler at $f_1$ generated in the opposite direction on the intensity of the pump as well as the effects of attenuation and the pump pulse duration on the outputs. Panels (a) and (b) depict the cases of a long pump pulse (quasi-CW regime). Here, $T_{2,3}(x=L)= |a_{2,3}(L)/a_{30}|^2$ are the transmission factors, and $a_{30}$ is the input pump maximum. The value $T_2(L)$ represents OPA. Nonlinear optical reflectivity (NLOR) at $f_1$ is given by the value $R_{10}= |a_{1}(x=0)/a_{30}|^2$. Panel (a), which corresponds to the attenuation-free regime, shows that a huge enhancement in the OPA and in the NLOR occurs when the pump intensity reaches a certain threshold value. This is the effect specific to BW coupling which originates from the appearance of the intensity-resonant distributed NLO coupling feedback [@Popov:APB.84.131]. Here, photon conversion efficiency reaches 100% at a relatively small increase of the pump above the threshold value. Attenuation significantly decreases OPA (panel (b)). Remarkably, NLOR does *not* experience such a significant decrease. It is because the reflected wave is predominantly generated near the MM entrance where the pump and the signal are not yet significantly attenuated. Besides that, the attenuation for the $f_1$ mode
\frac{\tau_0 + 1-\tau}{\delta\tau}-\tanh\frac{\tau_0-\tau}{\delta\tau}\right),$$ where $ \tau = t/\Delta\tau$, $ \delta\tau$ is the duration of the pulse front and tail, and $ \tau_0 $ is the shift of the front relative to $ t=0$. The value $ \delta\tau=0.01 $ and $ \tau_0=0.5 $ were accept for the simulations. The input signal at $ f_2 $ was supposed to be a continuous wave with $ a_{20}~=~10^{-5}a_{30}$. 

! [ \[fig4\ ] ocular parametric amplification and frequency - shifting NLO reflectivity vs. saturation of the pump.](fig4.eps){width=".98\columnwidth " } 

 number   \[fig4\ ] demonstrates the addiction of the end product amplified signal at $ f_2 $ and of the idler at $ f_1 $ beget in the opposite direction on the saturation of the heart as well as the effects of attenuation and the pump pulsation duration on the outputs. dialog box (a) and (bacillus) depict the cases of a long heart pulse (quasi - CW regime). Here, $ T_{2,3}(x = L)= |a_{2,3}(L)/a_{30}|^2 $ are the transmittance factors, and $ a_{30}$ is the input signal pump maximum. The value $ T_2(L)$ represents OPA. Nonlinear optical reflectivity (NLOR) at $ f_1 $ is give by the value $ R_{10}= |a_{1}(x=0)/a_{30}|^2$. Panel (a), which corresponds to the attenuation - free regime, shows that a huge enhancement in the OPA and in the NLOR occur when the pump intensity reaches a certain threshold value. This is the effect specific to BW coupling which originates from the appearance of the intensity - resonant distributed NLO match feedback [ @Popov: APB.84.131 ]. Here, photon conversion efficiency reaches 100% at a relatively small addition of the heart above the threshold value. Attenuation significantly decreases OPA (panel (b-complex vitamin) ). unusually, NLOR does * not * experience such a significant decrease. It is because the reflect wave is predominantly generated near the MM entrance where the pump and the signal are not yet significantly attenuated. Besides that, the attenuation for the $ f_1 $ mode
\fraf{\tau_0+1-\tau}{\delta\tau}-\tanh\frac{\txu_0-\tau}{\delta\tau}\riyyt),$$ whece $\tau=t/\Selta\tau$, $\delta\tau$ is the duration of tye puose front and tail, and $\tau_0$ is tje shift of uhe front relativx to $t=0$. Tmz valhcs $\denva\tau=0.01$ and $\tau_0=0.5$ wgre taken fos the simulatimnr. Che input signal at $f_2$ was supposed tj be a vojtinuous wave rith $w_{20}~=~10^{-5}a_{30}$.

![\[fif4\] Optical parametric amplification and frtquency-shifting NLP reflectivity vs. intensitj of the pump.](fig4.eps){widhh=".98\columnwidjg"}

Fidyre \[fig4\] demonrtrates tht bependence kf the output amplified signal xt $f_2$ cnd of the udoer dt $f_1$ generaved in the oppositc direcdion on the intensity of thw pump as well as the effects of attenuwtion and tke pump pulse duratiob in thg out[uts. Pandls (a) ahd (b) dfpirt the casea of a long pump pulse (quasi-CW rqtime). Here, $T_{2,3}(x=L)= |a_{2,3}(L)/a_{30}|^2$ awe the transmission factors, and $a_{30}$ is the pnpuf pump maximum. The valuw $T_2(L)$ represents OPA. Nlnlinear jptical reflectivity (NLOR) at $f_1$ is given by the vanue $R_{10}= |x_{1}(x=0)/a_{30}|^2$. Pwvwl (a), which corresponds to the attenuation-free rqfike, shows that a muge enhancement im hhr OPA and in tfe NLOX odcurs when the pumo intenfity eeaches a ceryain threshold value. This iw the effect wpecific to BW cou'ling which urigonatex from the appearance oy the jntensity-redonant diagributed NLO couolikg xeedback [@Popov:APB.84.131]. Here, phoeon convecsion efficidncy reachqs 100% at a rflatiyaly small increase of tke pukp above tje threshold value. Attenuation significantly cewredses OPA (panek (b)). Remarkablr, NLOR does *noj* experieuce suzh a signiricant vecrease. It ys because tha reflected weve is prqdomunanrly gendfated near the MM entrauee where rhe pump and the slgnal zre not yet sigunfucantly attenuayed. Befifex evat, the attetuatkon gor tfe $f_1$ mode
\frac{\tau_0+1-\tau}{\delta\tau}-\tanh\frac{\tau_0-\tau}{\delta\tau}\right),$$ where $\tau=t/\Delta\tau$, $\delta\tau$ is the duration pulse and tail, $\tau_0$ is the to The values $\delta\tau=0.01$ $\tau_0=0.5$ were taken the simulations. The input signal at was supposed to be a continuous wave with $a_{20}~=~10^{-5}a_{30}$. ![\[fig4\] Optical parametric amplification frequency-shifting NLO reflectivity vs. intensity of the pump.](fig4.eps){width=".98\columnwidth"} Figure \[fig4\] demonstrates the dependence the amplified at and of the idler at $f_1$ generated in the opposite direction on the intensity of the as well as the effects of attenuation and pump pulse duration on outputs. Panels (a) and (b) the of a pump (quasi-CW Here, $T_{2,3}(x=L)= |a_{2,3}(L)/a_{30}|^2$ the transmission factors, and $a_{30}$ is the input pump maximum. The value $T_2(L)$ represents OPA. Nonlinear optical (NLOR) at given by value |a_{1}(x=0)/a_{30}|^2$. (a), which corresponds attenuation-free regime, shows that a huge OPA and in the NLOR occurs when the intensity reaches certain threshold value. This is the specific to BW coupling which originates from the of the intensity-resonant distributed NLO coupling feedback [@Popov:APB.84.131]. Here, photon conversion efficiency reaches 100% at small increase of the above the threshold Attenuation decreases (panel Remarkably, NLOR *not* experience such a significant decrease. It is because the reflected is predominantly generated near the MM entrance where the pump signal not yet significantly Besides that, the attenuation the mode
\frac{\tau_0+1-\tau}{\delta\tau}-\tanh\fraC{\tau_0-\tau}{\delTa\tau}\RigHt),$$ wHeRe $\taU=t/\DeLta\tau$, $\delta\tau$ IS the Duration of the pulse fronT and tAiL, And $\tAU_0$ iS the sHift of tHE fRONt rElAtIve To $T=0$. thE valuEs $\dElta\tau=0.01$ And $\tau_0=0.5$ were TakEn For the simulaTIoNs. The input SigNal at $f_2$ was supPosEd to be A cOntINuous WavE with $A_{20}~=~10^{-5}a_{30}$.

![\[fig4\] OPTical pArametric AmPLificaTIon and fREQuEncy-Shifting NLO reflecTIvITy vs. intensity oF the puMp.](FIg4.EPS){wiDth=".98\ColumnwidtH"}

FIgure \[FIg4\] demonSTrATES thE Dependence of tHe output ampLIfiEd signAl At $f_2$ ANd of thE idleR aT $F_1$ geNerated in thE oppOsite direCtion oN The inteNSity of tHe pump As wEll As thE EfFeCts Of ATteNUaTioN And The pump pUlSe DuratIon oN THE OutpUts. paneLs (a) anD (b) depict the caSes Of a lONg pUmp puLse (quAsi-Cw rEgime). here, $T_{2,3}(x=l)= |a_{2,3}(L)/a_{30}|^2$ aRe The transmission FactOrs, and $a_{30}$ is The InPut PuMp maxIMum. The ValUe $T_2(l)$ represEnts OPA. nOnlInEAR OpTical reflectivity (NlOr) AT $f_1$ Is given bY the vaLUe $r_{10}= |a_{1}(X=0)/A_{30}|^2$. Panel (a), wHiCh cOrreSPOnds tO the ATtEnuation-Free reGImE, sHows thaT a Huge enHaNceMenT in thE oPA aNd in thE NLOR occUrs whEN the pump intensITy reaches a cerTAiN THrESholD vaLue. This is thE effECt spEcifIC tO BW COupliNg whiCh ORiGInates from the appearAnCe of thE inteNsity-resonant DistributeD nlo couplinG feeDBaCK [@Popov:APB.84.131]. Here, pHoton Conversion EFficiencY reacHes 100% at a reLatively sMALl increaSe oF thE puMp aBOVe The threshold vALUe. AtTeNuation SigNificanTly DecReaSes oPa (panel (b)). ReMarkably, nLoR DoEs *Not* ExperIEnce such A sIgnIfIcaNt decREase. It Is becAuse ThE rEFleCted wavE Is PREdomInAnTly gEneRaTed neAr thE mM eNtrance Where the pUmp ANd thE sIgNal are nOt yet significAnTly attenuaTeD. BeSides tHAT, the atteNuation for the $f_1$ mode
\frac{\tau_0+1-\tau}{\delt a\tau}-\ta nh\fr ac{ \ta u_ 0-\t au}{ \delta\tau}\ri g ht), $$ where $\tau=t/\Delt a\tau $, $\de l ta \tau$  is the du r a tio nof  th ep ul se fr ont  and ta il, and $\ tau _0 $ is the shi f tof the fro ntrelative to$t= 0$. Th eval u es $\ del ta\ta u=0.01 $  and $ \tau_0=0. 5$ were t a ken for t he  sim ulations. The inp u ts ignal at $f_2$  was s up p os e d  to  be  a continu ou s wav e  with $ a _{ 2 0 } ~=~ 1 0^{-5}a_{30}$ .

![\[fig4 \ ] O ptical  p ara m etricampli fi c ati on and freq uenc y-shiftin g NLOr eflecti v ity vs.  inten sit y o f th e  p um p.] (f i g4. e ps ){w i dth =".98\co lu mn width "}
F i g u re \ [fi g4\]  demo nstrates thedep ende n ceof th e out putam plifi ed sig nal a t$f_2$ and of th e id ler at $f _1$  g ene ra ted i n  the o ppo sit e direc tion on the  i n t e ns ity of the pump as  w e l las the e ffects of  a t tenuatio nand  the p ump p ulse du ration o n theo ut pu ts. Pan el s (a)an d ( b)depic t  the  cases  of a lo ng pu m p pulse (quasi - CW regime). H e re , $T _ {2,3 }(x =L)= |a_{2, 3}(L ) /a_{ 30}| ^ 2$  ar e  thetrans mi s si o n factors, and $a_{ 30 }$ isthe i nput pump max imum. Thev a l ue $T_2( L)$r ep r esents OPA. No nline ar optical reflecti vity(NLOR) a t $f_1$ i s given by  th e v alu e $ R _ {1 0}= |a_{1}(x= 0 ) /a_{ 30 }|^2$.Pan el (a),  wh ich  co rre sp onds to t he atten ua ti on -f ree  regi m e, shows  t hat  a  hu ge en h anceme nt in  the  O PA and  in the NL O R  occ ur swhen  th epumpinte n sit y reach es a cert ain thre sh ol d value . This is the  e ffect spec if icto BWc o upling w hich originates from th e  appear anc e oftheintensity -re sonant  di s tribut ed NLO  coup li ngf e edbac k [@ Pop ov :APB.84.13 1 ] . H ere,ph oton  conver sion efficiency re a che s 100% at a r ela tive l y  s mal l  i n cre as e  of t he pump above t he thresho ld va lue. Atten u ati on  signif icantly  decr e ases OP A (panel(b)). Rem ar kabl y ,  NL OR does *n ot* expe rience su c h a s i gn ifica ntdecrea se . I t isbecaus e  th e ref lected  w ave is  pred om inantlygenerated near the MM e ntranc e whe rethe pumpand the  signal a re n ot yet sig nif ica ntlyatt e nuate d. B e si des that,  the attenuati o nfor t he  $f_1$ mode 
\frac{\tau_0+1-\tau}{\delta\tau}-\tanh\frac{\tau_0-\tau}{\delta\tau}\right),$$ where_$\tau=t/\Delta\tau$, $\delta\tau$_is the duration of_the pulse_front_and tail,_and_$\tau_0$ is the_shift of the_front relative to $t=0$._The values $\delta\tau=0.01$_and_$\tau_0=0.5$ were taken for the simulations. The input signal at $f_2$ was supposed to_be_a continuous_wave_with_$a_{20}~=~10^{-5}a_{30}$.

![\[fig4\] Optical parametric amplification and_frequency-shifting NLO reflectivity vs. intensity_of the_pump.](fig4.eps){width=".98\columnwidth"}

Figure \[fig4\] demonstrates the dependence of the output amplified_signal_at $f_2$ and_of the idler at $f_1$ generated in the opposite_direction on the intensity of the_pump as well_as_the_effects of attenuation and_the pump pulse duration on the_outputs. Panels (a) and (b) depict_the cases of a long pump pulse_(quasi-CW regime). Here, $T_{2,3}(x=L)= |a_{2,3}(L)/a_{30}|^2$ are_the transmission factors, and $a_{30}$_is the_input pump maximum. The value_$T_2(L)$ represents OPA._Nonlinear optical_reflectivity (NLOR) at_$f_1$ is given by the value_$R_{10}= |a_{1}(x=0)/a_{30}|^2$. Panel_(a), which corresponds to the attenuation-free_regime,_shows that a_huge_enhancement_in the_OPA and in_the_NLOR occurs_when_the pump intensity reaches a certain_threshold_value. This is the effect specific to_BW coupling which originates_from_the appearance of the_intensity-resonant distributed NLO coupling feedback_[@Popov:APB.84.131]. Here, photon conversion efficiency reaches_100% at_a relatively_small increase of the pump above the threshold value. Attenuation significantly_decreases OPA (panel (b)). Remarkably, NLOR_does *not* experience such_a significant_decrease._It is because_the_reflected wave_is predominantly generated near the MM entrance_where the_pump and the signal are not_yet significantly attenuated. Besides_that,_the attenuation for the $f_1$ mode