 @16_Extending_Schoelkopf]. A Ramsey type measurement is performed. Here, two $\pi/2$ pulses are applied on the transmon (initially prepared in its ground state), separated by a period of dispersive interaction with the storage cavity (equivalent to a Controlled-Phase gate). These operations take the transmon to either its ground or excited state, depending on the photon-number parity in the storage cavity. The state of the transmon is then read-out projectively using the other cavity.

On the other hand, if the qubit is encoded in states of different parity, as is true of our qubits ($\ket{C_{\alpha}^\pm}=\mathcal{N}_{\alpha}^\pm (\ket{\alpha}\pm\ket{-\alpha})$), then error-correction turns out to be more challenging. However, if there is protection against amplitude decay of the coherent states, and the qubits are encoded in cat states, then one needs to worry only about bit-flip errors, which can be corrected with joint parity measurements on several cavities [@15_Confining_Devoret; @17_Degeneracy_Mirrahimi; @18_Coherent_Devoret]. Joint parity measurements would be more hardware-resource consuming than parity measurements on single cavities, but a few experiments have demonstrated their feasibility, e.g. the one in ref. [@16_Schrodinger_Schoelkopf]. Similar challenges rise in applying error correction when encoding the qubits in the different parity Fock states, $\ket{0}$ and $\ket{1}$ [@16_New_Girvin; @18_Performance_Jiang].

The instantaneous eigenstates of our Hamiltonian $H(t)=-K {a^{\dagger}}^2 a^2 + (\mathcal{E}_p(t) {a^{\dagger}}^2 +\mathcal{E}_p^*(t) a^2)$ are the coherent states $\ket{\alpha}$ and $\ket{-\alpha}$, where $\alpha=\sqrt{\mathcal{E}_p/K}$. It is interesting to note that a general Hamiltonian of the form $H(t)=-K {a^{\dagger}}^n a^n + (\mathcal{E}_p(t) {a^{\dagger}}^n +\mathcal{E}_p^*(t) a^n)$ would have $`n\textrm'$ different coherent states as their eigenstates, e.g. for $n=4$, the
@16_Extending_Schoelkopf ]. A Ramsey type measurement is performed. Here, two $ \pi/2 $ pulses are applied on the transmon (initially prepare in its earth state), separated by a period of diffusing interaction with the storage cavity (equivalent to a Controlled - Phase gate). These operation take the transmon to either its ground or aroused state, depending on the photon - issue parity in the storage pit. The state of the transmon is then read - out projectively using the other cavity. 

 On the other hand, if the qubit is encode in states of different parity, as is dependable of our qubits ($ \ket{C_{\alpha}^\pm}=\mathcal{N}_{\alpha}^\pm (\ket{\alpha}\pm\ket{-\alpha})$), then error - correction turn out to be more ambitious. However, if there is protection against amplitude decay of the coherent states, and the qubits are encoded in cat states, then one need to worry only about bit - flip errors, which can be corrected with joint parity measurements on several cavities [ @15_Confining_Devoret; @17_Degeneracy_Mirrahimi; @18_Coherent_Devoret ]. Joint parity measurements would be more hardware - resource consuming than parity measurements on single cavities, but a few experiments have show their feasibility, e.g.   the one in ref.   [ @16_Schrodinger_Schoelkopf ]. exchangeable challenges rise in applying error discipline when encoding the qubits in the unlike parity Fock states, $ \ket{0}$ and $ \ket{1}$ [ @16_New_Girvin; @18_Performance_Jiang ]. 

 The instantaneous eigenstates of our Hamiltonian $ H(t)=-K { a^{\dagger}}^2 a^2 + (\mathcal{E}_p(t) { a^{\dagger}}^2 + \mathcal{E}_p^*(t) a^2)$ are the coherent states $ \ket{\alpha}$ and $ \ket{-\alpha}$, where $ \alpha=\sqrt{\mathcal{E}_p / K}$. It is interesting to notice that a general Hamiltonian of the form $ H(t)=-K { a^{\dagger}}^n a^n + (\mathcal{E}_p(t) { a^{\dagger}}^n + \mathcal{E}_p^*(t) a^n)$ would have $ 'n\textrm'$ different coherent states as their eigenstates, e.g.   for $ n=4 $, the
 @16_Exhending_Schoelkopf]. A Ramsty type measuremeur is pxrformes. Here, tdo $\pi/2$ pulses are applied on vhe rransnon (initially prepared in its ggound stare), stparated by a permkd of dlfperalve iutxraction with tme storage wavity (equivalang co a Controlled-Phase gate). These operwtions yane the transmog to qithsg lts ground or excited state, depehding oi the photon-numner parity in the storage favihy. The state of thf transmon us trwn read-out pfojectivelj using the other cavity.

On the other hand, kf thz qubit is guxodfg in states of dpfferent paribj, as is true og our qubits ($\kct{C_{\al'ha}^\pn}=\mathcal{N}_{\alpha}^\pm (\ket{\anpha}\pm\ket{-\alpha})$), theg error-cosrzction turns out to bw nore whalnengkbg. Fowtvec, ir therf ia protectikn against qmplitude decay of uhe bpherent statss, and tre qubits are encoded in cat states, thet ohe needs to worry only qbout bit-flip errors, ahich can be corrected with joint parity measurements on saveram carlbies [@15_Xojfining_Devoret; @17_Degeneracy_Mirrahimi; @18_Coherent_Dedkrtt]. Moint parity meafurements wpupd fe more hardwxre-resourde consuming than oarity ieasueements og simgle cavities, but a few expwriments havv denonstrated their fzasibility, e.y. the ome in ref. [@16_Schrodinger_Schoelko'f]. Simjlar challejges rise kn applying errof cprsection when encoding the zubits in the differdnt karity Sock stated, $\ket{0}$ and $\ket{1}$ [@16_New_Girvin; @18_Oerfotmance_Biang].

The ijstantaneous eigenstates of our Hamiltonian $H(j)=-K {d^{\dacger}}^2 a^2 + (\iathcsl{E}_p(t) {a^{\dagger}}^2 +\mathcal{E}_p^*(t) a^2)$ cre the eoherevt states $\iet{\alphe}$ and $\ket{-\alpra}$, where $\alphd=\dqrt{\mathcal{E}_'/K}$. It is ynteeestung to vute that a genrral Hamiltonian of the form $H(t)=-K {a^{\dagner}}^n x^h + (\mathcal{E}_p(t) {a^{\bcgter}}^n +\mathcal{E}_p^*(t) a^n)$ wotlf iave $`g\dextrm'$ diffesent cofrrent states as bhekr eogenstates, e.g. for $n=4$, tve
@16_Extending_Schoelkopf]. A Ramsey type measurement is performed. $\pi/2$ are applied the transmon (initially separated a period of interaction with the cavity (equivalent to a Controlled-Phase gate). operations take the transmon to either its ground or excited state, depending on photon-number parity in the storage cavity. The state of the transmon is then projectively the cavity. the other hand, if the qubit is encoded in states of different parity, as is true our qubits ($\ket{C_{\alpha}^\pm}=\mathcal{N}_{\alpha}^\pm (\ket{\alpha}\pm\ket{-\alpha})$), then error-correction turns out be more challenging. However, there is protection against amplitude of coherent states, the are in cat states, one needs to worry only about bit-flip errors, which can be corrected with joint parity measurements on cavities [@15_Confining_Devoret; Joint parity would more consuming than parity single cavities, but a few experiments feasibility, e.g. the one in ref. [@16_Schrodinger_Schoelkopf]. Similar rise in error correction when encoding the qubits the different parity Fock states, $\ket{0}$ and $\ket{1}$ @18_Performance_Jiang]. The instantaneous eigenstates of our Hamiltonian $H(t)=-K {a^{\dagger}}^2 a^2 + (\mathcal{E}_p(t) {a^{\dagger}}^2 +\mathcal{E}_p^*(t) a^2)$ coherent states $\ket{\alpha}$ and where $\alpha=\sqrt{\mathcal{E}_p/K}$. It interesting note a Hamiltonian of form $H(t)=-K {a^{\dagger}}^n a^n + (\mathcal{E}_p(t) {a^{\dagger}}^n +\mathcal{E}_p^*(t) a^n)$ would have different coherent states as their eigenstates, e.g. for $n=4$, the
 @16_Extending_Schoelkopf]. A RamseY type measuRemenT is PerFoRmed. here, Two $\pi/2$ pulses are APpliEd on the transmon (initialLy prePaREd in ITs GrounD state), sEPaRATed By A pEriOd OF dIsperSivE interaCtion with tHe sToRage cavity (eqUIvAlent to a CoNtrOlled-Phase gaTe). THese opErAtiONs takE thE tranSmon to EIther iTs ground oR eXCited sTAte, depeNDInG on tHe photon-number parITy IN the storage cavIty. The StATe OF The TraNsmon is theN rEad-ouT ProjectIVeLY USinG The other cavitY.

On the other HAnd, If the qUbIt iS EncodeD in stAtES of Different paRity, As is true oF our quBIts ($\ket{C_{\ALpha}^\pm}=\mAthcal{n}_{\alPha}^\Pm (\keT{\AlPhA}\pm\KeT{-\AlpHA})$), tHen ERroR-correctIoN tUrns oUt to BE MORe chAllEngiNg. HowEver, if there is ProTectIOn aGainsT amplItudE dEcay oF the coHerenT sTates, and the qubiTs arE encoded iN caT sTatEs, Then oNE needs To wOrrY only abOut bit-fLIp eRrORS, WhIch can be corrected wItH JOiNt parity MeasurEMeNtS On severaL cAviTies [@15_cONfiniNg_DeVOrEt; @17_DegeneRacy_MiRRaHiMi; @18_CoherEnT_DevorEt]. joiNt pArity MEasuRementS would be More hARdware-resource COnsuming than pARiTY MeASureMenTs on single cAvitIEs, buT a feW ExPerIMents Have dEmONsTRated their feasibiliTy, E.g. the oNe in rEf. [@16_Schrodinger_schoelkopf]. sIMIlar chalLengES rISe in applying erRor coRrection whEN encodinG the qUbits in tHe differeNT Parity FoCk sTatEs, $\kEt{0}$ aND $\KeT{1}$ [@16_New_Girvin; @18_PerFORmanCe_jiang].

ThE inStantanEouS eiGenStaTeS of our HamIltonian $h(t)=-k {a^{\DaGgEr}}^2 a^2 + (\MathcAL{E}_p(t) {a^{\dagGeR}}^2 +\maThCal{e}_p^*(t) a^2)$ aRE the coHerenT staTeS $\kET{\alPha}$ and $\kET{-\aLPHa}$, whErE $\aLpha=\SqrT{\mAthcaL{E}_p/K}$. iT is InteresTing to notE thAT a geNeRaL HamiltOnian of the forM $H(T)=-K {a^{\dagger}}^n A^n + (\MatHcal{E}_p(T) {A^{\Dagger}}^n +\mAthcal{E}_p^*(t) a^n)$ would have $`n\teXTrm'$ diffEreNt cohErenT states as TheIr eigeNstATes, e.g. fOr $n=4$, the
 @16_Extending_Schoelkopf] . A Ramsey  type  me asu re ment  isperformed. Her e , tw o $\pi/2$ pulses are a pplie do n th e  t ransm on (ini t ia l l y p re pa red  i n  i ts gr oun d state ), separat edby  a period of di spersive i nte raction with  th e stor ag e c a vity(eq uival ent to a Cont rolled-Ph as e  gate) .  Theseo p er atio ns take the trans m on to either itsground  o r  e x c ite d s tate, depe nd ing o n  the ph o to n - n umb e r parity in t he storagec avi ty. Th esta t e of t he tr an s mon  is then re ad-o ut projec tively using t h e other  cavit y.
On  the ot he r h an d , i f  t heq ubi t is enc od ed  in s tate s o f  dif fer entparit y, as is true  of  our qub its ( $\ket {C_{ \a lpha} ^\pm}= \math ca l{N}_{\alpha}^\ pm ( \ket{\alp ha} \p m\k et {-\al p ha})$) , t hen  error- correct i ontu r n s  o ut to be more chal le n g in g. Howev er, if th er e  is prot ec tio n ag a i nst a mpli t ud e decayof the co he rent st at es, an dthe  qu bitsa re e ncoded  in catstate s , then one nee d s to worry on l ya b ou t  bit -fl ip errors,whic h  can  bec or rec t ed wi th jo in t  p a rity measurements o nsevera l cav ities [@15_Co nfining_De v o r et; @17_ Dege n er a cy_Mirrahimi;@18_C oherent_De v oret]. J ointparity m easuremen t s  would b e m ore  ha rdw a r e- resource cons u m ingth an pari tymeasure men tsonsin gl e cavitie s, but a  f ew  e xp eri ments have dem on str at edtheir feasib ility , e. g.  t h e o ne in r e f. [ @16_ Sc hr odin ger _S choel kopf ] . S imilarchallenge s r i se i nap plyingerror correct io n when enc od ing  the q u b its in t he different parity Foc k  states , $ \ket{ 0}$and $\ket {1} $ [@16 _Ne w _Girvi n; @18 _Perf or man c e _Jian g ] .
Th einstantane o u s e igens ta tesof ourHamiltonian $H(t)= - K { a^{\dagger}}^ 2 a ^2 + ( \m ath c al { E}_ p( t ) { a ^ {\dagger}}^2 +\ mathcal{E} _p ^ *( t) a^2)$ a r e t he  cohere nt stat es $\ k et{\alp ha}$ and$\ket{-\a lp ha}$ , whe re $\alpha =\sqrt{\ mathcal{E } _p/K} $ .It is  in terest in g t o not e that a g enera l Hami lt onianof th eform $H( t)=-K {a^{\dagger}}^n a ^n + ( \math cal {E}_p(t){a^ { \da gger}}^n+\ma thcal{E}_p ^*( t)a^n)$  wo u ld ha ve $ ` n\ tex t rm'$diff e rent cohe r en t s t a te s as theire i g ens tates , e . g. for  $n= 4$, the
 @16_Extending_Schoelkopf]._A Ramsey_type measurement is performed._Here, two_$\pi/2$_pulses are_applied_on the transmon_(initially prepared in_its ground state), separated_by a period_of_dispersive interaction with the storage cavity (equivalent to a Controlled-Phase gate). These operations take_the_transmon to_either_its_ground or excited state, depending_on the photon-number parity in_the storage_cavity. The state of the transmon is then_read-out_projectively using the_other cavity.

On the other hand, if the qubit is_encoded in states of different parity,_as is true_of_our_qubits ($\ket{C_{\alpha}^\pm}=\mathcal{N}_{\alpha}^\pm (\ket{\alpha}\pm\ket{-\alpha})$), then_error-correction turns out to be more_challenging. However, if there is protection_against amplitude decay of the coherent states,_and the qubits are encoded in_cat states, then one needs_to worry_only about bit-flip errors, which_can be corrected_with joint_parity measurements on_several cavities [@15_Confining_Devoret; @17_Degeneracy_Mirrahimi; @18_Coherent_Devoret]. Joint_parity measurements would_be more hardware-resource consuming than parity_measurements_on single cavities,_but_a_few experiments_have demonstrated their_feasibility,_e.g. the one_in_ref. [@16_Schrodinger_Schoelkopf]. Similar challenges rise in applying_error_correction when encoding the qubits in the_different parity Fock states,_$\ket{0}$_and $\ket{1}$ [@16_New_Girvin; @18_Performance_Jiang].

The_instantaneous eigenstates of our Hamiltonian_$H(t)=-K {a^{\dagger}}^2 a^2 + (\mathcal{E}_p(t) {a^{\dagger}}^2_+\mathcal{E}_p^*(t) a^2)$_are the_coherent states $\ket{\alpha}$ and $\ket{-\alpha}$, where $\alpha=\sqrt{\mathcal{E}_p/K}$. It is interesting to_note that a general Hamiltonian of_the form $H(t)=-K {a^{\dagger}}^n_a^n +_(\mathcal{E}_p(t)_{a^{\dagger}}^n +\mathcal{E}_p^*(t) a^n)$_would_have $`n\textrm'$_different coherent states as their eigenstates, e.g. for_$n=4$, the