 the case of gravity, we have $\delta_\xi \Phi= \mathsterling_\xi \Phi$ and $k$ can be written as [@Lee:1990nz; @Wald:1993nt; @Iyer:1994ys] (for more details see [@Azeyanagi:2009wf; @Detournay:2016gao]) $$\label{k}
\int_\Sigma k_\chi[\mathsterling_\xi \Phi; \Phi ]
=\int_{\Sigma} \left (\delta_\xi Q_\chi(\Phi)+i_\chi \Theta(\mathsterling_\xi \Phi, \Phi)
\right ) \,.$$ In the literature, another definition for the $n-2$-form is made by Barnich-Brandt-Compère [@Barnich:2001jy; @Barnich:2007bf]. Those two differ by the so-called $E-$term [@Azeyanagi:2009wf] $$E[\mathsterling_{\xi_1}g;\mathsterling_{\xi_2}g]=\frac12\left(-\frac32 Z^{abcd}\mathsterling_{\xi_1}g_c^e\wedge \mathsterling_{\xi_2} g_{ed}+2Z^{acde}\mathsterling_{\xi_1}g_{cd}\wedge \mathsterling_{\xi_2} g^b_e \right)\epsilon_{abc} dx^c\,.$$ It turns out that in the considered cases, this term always vanishes and so the two definitions are equivalent.

BTZ Black Holes
===============

Symmetries
----------

BTZ black holes are locally AdS$_3$. The latter is a maximally symmetric space. One main property of these spacetimes is that all tensors made out of the curvature and its covariant derivatives, like $R_{\mu\nu},\nabla_\mu R_{\nu\rho},...$ can be expressed in terms of the metric tensor. For example, $$R_{\mu\nu}=-\frac{2}{\ell^2} g_{\mu\nu}$$ where $\ell$ is the AdS radius. Note that there is no way to construct a 3-tensor just from products of the metric. Another consequence of the symmetries is that the left hand side of the equations of motion $E_{\mu\nu}$ evaluated on BTZ black holes, can always be rewritten as a constant times the metric
the case of gravity, we have $ \delta_\xi \Phi= \mathsterling_\xi \Phi$ and $ k$ can be written as [ @Lee:1990nz; @Wald:1993nt; @Iyer:1994ys ] (for more details visualize [ @Azeyanagi:2009wf; @Detournay:2016gao ]) $ $ \label{k } 
 \int_\Sigma k_\chi[\mathsterling_\xi \Phi; \Phi ] 
 = \int_{\Sigma } \left (\delta_\xi Q_\chi(\Phi)+i_\chi \Theta(\mathsterling_\xi \Phi, \Phi) 
 \right) \,.$$ In the literature, another definition for the $ n-2$-form is do by Barnich - Brandt - Compère [ @Barnich:2001jy; @Barnich:2007bf ]. Those two differ by the so - called $ E-$term [ @Azeyanagi:2009wf ] $ $ E[\mathsterling_{\xi_1}g;\mathsterling_{\xi_2}g]=\frac12\left(-\frac32 Z^{abcd}\mathsterling_{\xi_1}g_c^e\wedge \mathsterling_{\xi_2 } g_{ed}+2Z^{acde}\mathsterling_{\xi_1}g_{cd}\wedge \mathsterling_{\xi_2 } g^b_e \right)\epsilon_{abc } dx^c\,.$$ It change state out that in the considered cases, this terminus constantly vanishes and thus the two definitions are equivalent. 

 BTZ Black Holes 
 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 

 Symmetries 
 ---------- 

 BTZ bootleg holes are locally AdS$_3$. The latter is a maximally symmetric space. One main place of these spacetimes is that all tensors made out of the curvature and its covariant derivative instrument, like $ R_{\mu\nu},\nabla_\mu R_{\nu\rho},... $ can be expressed in terms of the measured tensor. For example, $ $ R_{\mu\nu}=-\frac{2}{\ell^2 } g_{\mu\nu}$$ where $ \ell$ is the AdS radius. Note that there be no way to construct a 3 - tensor merely from products of the metric function. Another consequence of the symmetries is that the left hand side of the equations of apparent motion $ E_{\mu\nu}$ evaluated on BTZ black holes, can always be rewritten as a constant times the metric
 thf case of gravity, we havt $\delta_\xi \Phi= \matkwterliig_\xi \Phj$ and $k$ zan be written as [@Lee:1990nz; @Wald:1993it; @Iter:1994ys] (for more details see [@Xzeyanagi:2009af; @Detouenay:2016jao]) $$\label{k}
\int_\Sigma k_\chi[\mathstedping_\ri \Phi; \Phi ]
=\int_{\Sinma} \left (\denta_\xi Q_\chi(\Phi)+i_\whk \Cheta(\mathsterling_\xi \Phi, \Phi)
\right ) \,.$$ Ig the lotfrature, anothet defpnytioh for the $n-2$-form is made by Barnich-Grandt-Cmmpère [@Barnich:2001ky; @Barnich:2007bf]. Those two difver hy the so-called $E-$tfrm [@Azeyanati:2009wf] $$W[\mathsterline_{\xi_1}g;\mathsttrning_{\xi_2}g]=\frad12\left(-\frac32 Z^{abcd}\mathsterling_{\xi_1}g_c^d\wedgz \mathsterlunt_{\xi_2} c_{ed}+2Z^{acde}\matisterlpng_{\xi_1}g_{cd}\wedge \mathstesling_{\xi_2} g^b_e \right)\epsikon_{ebc} ex^c\,.$$ It turns out that in the considered cases, thhs term always vaniwhws ang so the rwo deriiitjons age xquivalent.

BFZ Black Hooes
===============

Symmetries
----------

BTZ blsch holes are lodally WdF$_3$. The latter is a maximally symmetric skace. Kne main property of thwse spacetimes is thaj all tensjrs made out of the curvature and its covariant darivavixes, llke $F_{\nu\ju},\nabla_\mu R_{\nu\rho},...$ can be expressed in terms of fht mvtric tensor. For cxample, $$R_{\mu\nu}=-\frac{2}{\ekl^2} g_{\ko\nu}$$ where $\ell$ ks the AdA radius. Note that there ys no way to cjnsttuct a 3-tensor just from proeucts of the netric. Another condequence of the symmrtries is that the left hans side of tje equatikvs of motion $E_{\mu\vu}$ vvalgated on BTZ black holes, cwn always be xewrittev as a conftant timed the metric
the case of gravity, we have $\delta_\xi \Phi$ $k$ can written as [@Lee:1990nz; see @Detournay:2016gao]) $$\label{k} \int_\Sigma \Phi; \Phi ] \left (\delta_\xi Q_\chi(\Phi)+i_\chi \Theta(\mathsterling_\xi \Phi, \Phi) ) \,.$$ In the literature, another definition for the $n-2$-form is made by [@Barnich:2001jy; @Barnich:2007bf]. Those two differ by the so-called $E-$term [@Azeyanagi:2009wf] $$E[\mathsterling_{\xi_1}g;\mathsterling_{\xi_2}g]=\frac12\left(-\frac32 Z^{abcd}\mathsterling_{\xi_1}g_c^e\wedge \mathsterling_{\xi_2} \mathsterling_{\xi_2} \right)\epsilon_{abc} It out that in the considered cases, this term always vanishes and so the two definitions are BTZ Black Holes =============== Symmetries ---------- BTZ black are locally AdS$_3$. The is a maximally symmetric space. main of these is all made out of curvature and its covariant derivatives, like $R_{\mu\nu},\nabla_\mu R_{\nu\rho},...$ can be expressed in terms of the metric tensor. example, $$R_{\mu\nu}=-\frac{2}{\ell^2} $\ell$ is AdS Note there is no construct a 3-tensor just from products Another consequence of the symmetries is that the hand side the equations of motion $E_{\mu\nu}$ evaluated BTZ black holes, can always be rewritten as constant times the metric
 the case of gravity, we have $\delTa_\xi \Phi= \matHsterLinG_\xi \phI$ and $K$ can Be written as [@Lee:1990NZ; @WalD:1993nt; @Iyer:1994ys] (for more detailS see [@AZeYAnagI:2009Wf; @detouRnay:2016gao]) $$\LAbEL{K}
\inT_\SIgMa k_\ChI[\MaThsteRliNg_\xi \Phi; \phi ]
=\int_{\SigmA} \leFt (\Delta_\xi Q_\chi(\PHI)+i_\Chi \Theta(\maThsTerling_\xi \Phi, \phi)
\Right ) \,.$$ IN tHe lITeratUre, AnothEr defiNItion fOr the $n-2$-forM iS Made by bArnich-BRANdT-ComPère [@Barnich:2001jy; @BarnICh:2007BF]. Those two diffeR by the So-CAlLED $E-$tErm [@azeyanagi:2009wF] $$E[\MathsTErling_{\xI_1}G;\mATHSteRLing_{\xi_2}g]=\frac12\leFt(-\frac32 Z^{abcd}\MAthSterliNg_{\Xi_1}g_C^E\wedge \MathsTeRLinG_{\xi_2} g_{ed}+2Z^{acde}\MathSterling_{\xI_1}g_{cd}\weDGe \mathsTErling_{\xI_2} g^b_e \riGht)\EpsIlon_{ABc} Dx^C\,.$$ It TuRNs oUT tHat IN thE consideReD cAses, tHis tERM ALwayS vaNishEs and So the two definItiOns aRE eqUivalEnt.

BTz BlaCk holes
===============

symmetRies
----------

BtZ Black holes are loCallY AdS$_3$. The laTteR iS a mAxImallY SymmetRic SpaCe. One maIn propeRTy oF tHESE sPacetimes is that all TeNSOrS made out Of the cURvAtURe and its CoVarIant DERivatIves, LIkE $R_{\mu\nu},\naBla_\mu R_{\NU\rHo},...$ Can be exPrEssed iN tErmS of The meTRic tEnsor. FOr examplE, $$R_{\mu\nU}=-\Frac{2}{\ell^2} g_{\mu\nu}$$ whERe $\ell$ is the AdS RAdIUS. NOTe thAt tHere is no way To coNStruCt a 3-tENsOr jUSt froM prodUcTS oF The metric. Another conSeQuence Of the Symmetries is tHat the left HAND side of tHe eqUAtIOns of motion $E_{\mu\Nu}$ evaLuated on BTz Black holEs, can Always be Rewritten AS A constanT tiMes The MetRIC
 the case of gravity, we h ave $\delt a_\xi  \P hi=  \ math ster ling_\xi \Phi$ and$k$ can be written as[@Lee :1 9 90nz ;  @ Wald: 1993nt; @I y e r:1 99 4y s](f o rmoredet ails se e [@Azeyan agi :2 009wf; @Deto u rn ay:2016gao ])$$\label{k}\in t_\Sig ma  k_ \ chi[\ mat hster ling_\ x i \Phi ; \Phi ]=\ i nt_{\S i gma} \l e f t(\de lta_\xi Q_\chi(\P h i) + i_\chi \Theta( \maths te r li n g _\x i \ Phi, \Phi) 
\ right ) \,.$$ In t h e l i terature, ano ther defini t ion  for t he  $n - 2$-for m isma d e b y Barnich-B rand t-Compère  [@Bar n ich:200 1 jy; @Ba rnich: 200 7bf ]. T h os etwo  d i ffe r  b y t h e s o-called  $ E- $term  [@A z e y a nagi :20 09wf ] $$E [\mathsterlin g_{ \xi_ 1 }g; \math sterl ing_ {\ xi_2} g]=\fr ac12\ le ft(-\frac32 Z^{ abcd }\mathste rli ng _{\ xi _1}g_ c ^e\wed ge\ma thsterl ing_{\x i _2}  g _ { e d} +2Z^{acde}\mathste rl i n g_ {\xi_1}g _{cd}\ w ed ge \mathste rl ing _{\x i _ 2} g^ b_e\ ri ght)\eps ilon_{ a bc }dx^c\,. $$  It tu rn s o utthati n th e cons idered c ases, this term alwa y s vanishes an d  s o th e  two  de finitions a re e q uiva lent . 
BTZ Black  Hole s= == = ===========

Symmet ri es
--- ----- --

BTZ black  holes are l o cally Ad S$_3 $ .T he latter is a  maxi mally symm e tric spa ce. O ne mainpropertyo f  these s pac eti mes  is t ha t all tensors m adeou t of th e c urvatur e a ndits  co va riant der ivatives ,li ke  $ R_{ \mu\n u },\nabla _\ muR_ {\n u\rho } ,...$can b e ex pr es s edin term s  o f theme tr ic t ens or . For  exa m ple , $$R_{ \mu\nu}=- \fr a c{2} {\ el l^2} g_ {\mu\nu}$$ wh er e $\ell$ i sthe  AdS r a d ius. Not e that there is no wayt o const ruc t a 3 -ten sor justfro m prod uct s  of th e metr ic. A no the r conse q u en ceof  the symme t r ies  is t ha t th e lefthand side of the e q uat ions of motio n $ E_{\ m u \n u}$ ev a lua te d  on B TZ black holes,  can alway sb erewrittena s a  c onstant  timesthe m e tric
 the_case of_gravity, we have $\delta_\xi_\Phi= \mathsterling_\xi_\Phi$_and $k$_can_be written as_[@Lee:1990nz; @Wald:1993nt; @Iyer:1994ys]_(for more details see_[@Azeyanagi:2009wf; @Detournay:2016gao]) $$\label{k}
\int_\Sigma_k_\chi[\mathsterling_\xi_\Phi; \Phi ]
=\int_{\Sigma} \left (\delta_\xi Q_\chi(\Phi)+i_\chi \Theta(\mathsterling_\xi \Phi, \Phi)
\right ) \,.$$ In the literature,_another_definition for_the_$n-2$-form_is made by Barnich-Brandt-Compère [@Barnich:2001jy;_@Barnich:2007bf]. Those two differ by_the so-called_$E-$term [@Azeyanagi:2009wf] $$E[\mathsterling_{\xi_1}g;\mathsterling_{\xi_2}g]=\frac12\left(-\frac32 Z^{abcd}\mathsterling_{\xi_1}g_c^e\wedge \mathsterling_{\xi_2} g_{ed}+2Z^{acde}\mathsterling_{\xi_1}g_{cd}\wedge \mathsterling_{\xi_2} g^b_e_\right)\epsilon_{abc}_dx^c\,.$$ It turns_out that in the considered cases, this term always_vanishes and so the two definitions_are equivalent.

BTZ Black_Holes
===============

Symmetries
----------

BTZ_black_holes are locally AdS$_3$._The latter is a maximally symmetric_space. One main property of these_spacetimes is that all tensors made out_of the curvature and its covariant_derivatives, like $R_{\mu\nu},\nabla_\mu R_{\nu\rho},...$ can_be expressed_in terms of the metric_tensor. For example,_$$R_{\mu\nu}=-\frac{2}{\ell^2} g_{\mu\nu}$$_where $\ell$ is_the AdS radius. Note that there_is no way_to construct a 3-tensor just from_products_of the metric._Another_consequence_of the_symmetries is that_the_left hand_side_of the equations of motion $E_{\mu\nu}$_evaluated_on BTZ black holes, can always be_rewritten as a constant_times_the metric