f^N, g^N)$, then $\psi_N(i) \geq 1- \epsilon_N$ for every $N$ and $$\begin{aligned}
\lim_{N \to \infty}-\frac{1}{N}\log\phi_N(i) = D^*(i).\end{aligned}$$

See Section \[achievable\].

Note that selecting an experiment that minimizes $\mathscr{M}_i(u,\rho,s)$ over the set $\mathcal{U}$ is equivalent to selecting an experiment that maximizes $(1-\mathscr{M}_i(u,\rho,s))/s$. When $s$ is small, this function can be approximated as follows $$\begin{aligned}
\frac{1-\mathscr{M}_i(u,\rho,s)}{s} &= \frac{\sum_{j\neq i} ({{\rho}(j)})^s(1-\mu_j^i(u,s))}{s\sum_{j\neq i}  ({{\rho}(j)})^s}\\
&\approx \frac{\sum_{j\neq i} ({{\rho}(j)})^sD(p_i^u||p_j^u)}{\sum_{j\neq i}  ({{\rho}(j)})^s}\label{kldstrat},\end{aligned}$$ since $(1-\mu_j^i(u,s))/s \to D(p_i^u||p_j^u)$ as $s \to 0$. Thus, we can interpret the strategy DAS in terms of the zero-sum game discussed earlier in the beginning of Section \[probformsub\] after Definition \[kldef\]. In the zero-sum game, if the minimizing player selects an alternate hypothesis $j$ with probability $\beta(j) = (\rho(j))^s/\sum_{k\neq i}(\rho(k))^s$, then the strategy DAS selects an approximate best-response to the minimizing player’s strategy with respect to the payoff function in (\[zerosum\]).

Given a horizon $N$, the strategies DAS and DAS-RS described in this section are time-invariant. However, they depend on the value of $s_N$ and thus, on the horizon $N$ of the problem. In some cases, these strategies turn out to be independent of the value $s_N$ which results in fully
f^N, g^N)$, then $ \psi_N(i) \geq 1- \epsilon_N$ for every $ N$ and $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 \lim_{N \to \infty}-\frac{1}{N}\log\phi_N(i) = D^*(i).\end{aligned}$$ 

 See Section \[achievable\ ]. 

 Note that selecting an experiment that minimize $ \mathscr{M}_i(u,\rho, s)$ over the set $ \mathcal{U}$ is equivalent to choose an experiment that maximizes $ (1-\mathscr{M}_i(u,\rho, s))/s$. When $ s$ is small, this affair can be estimate as follows $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 \frac{1-\mathscr{M}_i(u,\rho, s)}{s } & = \frac{\sum_{j\neq i } ({ { \rho}(j)})^s(1-\mu_j^i(u, s))}{s\sum_{j\neq i }   ({ { \rho}(j)})^s}\\ 
 & \approx \frac{\sum_{j\neq i } ({ { \rho}(j)})^sD(p_i^u||p_j^u)}{\sum_{j\neq i }   ({ { \rho}(j)})^s}\label{kldstrat},\end{aligned}$$ since $ (1-\mu_j^i(u, s))/s \to D(p_i^u||p_j^u)$ as $ s \to 0$. Thus, we can understand the scheme DAS in terms of the zero - sum game discussed earlier in the beginning of incision \[probformsub\ ] after Definition \[kldef\ ]. In the zero - sum game, if the minimize player selects an alternate hypothesis $ j$ with probability $ \beta(j) = (\rho(j))^s/\sum_{k\neq i}(\rho(k))^s$, then the strategy DAS selects an approximate good - response to the minimizing actor ’s strategy with respect to the payoff function in (\[zerosum\ ]). 

 pass a horizon $ N$, the strategies DAS and DAS - RS described in this section are time - invariant. However, they count on the value of $ s_N$ and thus, on the horizon $ N$ of the problem. In some cases, these strategies turn out to be independent of the value $ s_N$ which result in fully
f^N, h^N)$, then $\psi_N(i) \geq 1- \epsilun_N$ for every $N$ and $$\bejin{alighed}
\lim_{N \go \infty}-\frac{1}{N}\log\phi_N(i) = D^*(i).\end{eligbed}$$

Set Section \[achievabld\].

Note than selectibg ai experiment thav minimidzs $\mafmscr{M}_n(u,\cho,s)$ over the sgt $\mathcal{U}$ hs equivalent do szlecting an experiment that maximizef $(1-\mathsvr{L}_i(u,\rho,s))/s$. When $f$ is fmalm, this function can be approximates as fonlows $$\begin{alogned}
\frac{1-\mathscr{M}_i(u,\rho,s)}{s} &= \vrac{\dum_{j\neq i} ({{\rho}(j)})^s(1-\mu_j^l(u,s))}{s\sum_{j\neq i}  ({{\wyo}(j)})^s}\\
&\approx \ffac{\sum_{j\neq i} ({{\rho}(j)})^sD(p_i^u||k_j^u)}{\sum_{j\neq i}  ({{\rho}(j)})^s}\label{kldstrat},\dnd{alngned}$$ since $(1-\my_j^i(k,v))/s \to D(p_i^u||p_o^u)$ as $f \to 0$. Thus, wc can itterprey the strategy DAV ib terms of the zero-suk game discussed ewrlier in tke beginning of Sectiin \[probxormvub\] xdtef Dtfiiitjon \[klfef\]. In the zedo-sum game, uf the minimizing pkarvt selects an altergaee hypothesis $j$ with probability $\beta(j) = (\rhk(j))^s/\sum_{k\neq i}(\rho(k))^s$, then rhe strategy DAS selefts an ap[roximate best-response to the minimizing player’s vtratxgh wnbm rerpeft to the payoff function in (\[zerosum\]).

Given a hjdieon $N$, the strategles DAS and DAS-RS cedctybed in this rectiou ade time-invariant. Hlwever, jhey dwpend on uhe vslue of $s_N$ and thus, on the yorizon $N$ of rhe problem. In somz cases, thesz strajegies turn out to be indepenbent or the value $s_N$ which fesults in fully
f^N, g^N)$, then $\psi_N(i) \geq 1- \epsilon_N$ $N$ $$\begin{aligned} \lim_{N \infty}-\frac{1}{N}\log\phi_N(i) = D^*(i).\end{aligned}$$ selecting experiment that minimizes over the set is equivalent to selecting an experiment maximizes $(1-\mathscr{M}_i(u,\rho,s))/s$. When $s$ is small, this function can be approximated as follows \frac{1-\mathscr{M}_i(u,\rho,s)}{s} &= \frac{\sum_{j\neq i} ({{\rho}(j)})^s(1-\mu_j^i(u,s))}{s\sum_{j\neq i} ({{\rho}(j)})^s}\\ &\approx \frac{\sum_{j\neq i} ({{\rho}(j)})^sD(p_i^u||p_j^u)}{\sum_{j\neq i} ({{\rho}(j)})^s}\label{kldstrat},\end{aligned}$$ $(1-\mu_j^i(u,s))/s D(p_i^u||p_j^u)$ $s 0$. Thus, we can interpret the strategy DAS in terms of the zero-sum game discussed earlier the beginning of Section \[probformsub\] after Definition \[kldef\]. the zero-sum game, if minimizing player selects an alternate $j$ probability $\beta(j) (\rho(j))^s/\sum_{k\neq then strategy DAS selects approximate best-response to the minimizing player’s strategy with respect to the payoff function in (\[zerosum\]). Given a $N$, the and DAS-RS in section time-invariant. However, they the value of $s_N$ and thus, $N$ of the problem. In some cases, these turn out be independent of the value $s_N$ results in fully
f^N, g^N)$, then $\psi_N(i) \geq 1- \epsilon_N$ fOr every $N$ anD $$\begiN{alIgnEd}
\Lim_{N \To \inFty}-\frac{1}{N}\log\phi_n(I) = D^*(i).\eNd{aligned}$$

See Section \[achIevabLe\].

nOte tHAt SelecTing an eXPeRIMenT tHaT miNiMIzEs $\matHscR{M}_i(u,\rho,S)$ over the seT $\maThCal{U}$ is equivaLEnT to selectiNg aN experiment tHat MaximiZeS $(1-\maTHscr{M}_I(u,\rHo,s))/s$. WHen $s$ is SMall, thIs functioN cAN be appROximateD AS fOlloWs $$\begin{aligned}
\fraC{1-\MaTHscr{M}_i(u,\rho,s)}{s} &= \frAc{\sum_{j\NeQ I} ({{\rHO}(J)})^s(1-\mU_j^i(U,s))}{s\sum_{j\neq I}  ({{\rHo}(j)})^s}\\
&\aPProx \fraC{\SuM_{J\NEq i} ({{\RHo}(j)})^sD(p_i^u||p_j^u)}{\suM_{j\neq i}  ({{\rho}(j)})^s}\LAbeL{kldstRaT},\enD{AligneD}$$ sincE $(1-\mU_J^i(u,S))/s \to D(p_i^u||p_j^u)$ As $s \tO 0$. Thus, we caN interPRet the sTRategy DaS in teRms Of tHe zeRO-sUm GamE dIScuSSeD eaRLieR in the beGiNnIng of sectION \[PRobfOrmSub\] aFter DEfinition \[kldeF\]. In The zERo-sUm gamE, if thE minImIzing Player SelecTs An alternate hypoThesIs $j$ with prObaBiLitY $\bEta(j) = (\rHO(j))^s/\sum_{K\neQ i}(\rHo(k))^s$, theN the strATegY Das SElEcts an approximate bEsT-REsPonse to tHe miniMIzInG Player’s sTrAteGy wiTH RespeCt to THe Payoff fuNction IN (\[zErOsum\]).

GivEn A horizOn $n$, thE stRategIEs DAs and DAs-RS descrIbed iN This section are TIme-invariant. HOWeVER, tHEy dePenD on the value Of $s_N$ ANd thUs, on THe HorIZon $N$ oF the pRoBLeM. in some cases, these strAtEgies tUrn ouT to be independEnt of the vaLUE $S_N$ which rEsulTS iN Fully
f^N, g^N)$, then $\psi_N(i ) \geq 1-\epsi lon _N$  f or e very  $N$ and $$\be g in{a ligned}
\lim_{N \to \i nfty} -\ f rac{ 1 }{ N}\lo g\phi_N ( i) =  D^ *( i) .\e nd { al igned }$$ 

See S ection \[a chi ev able\].

Not e  t hat select ing  an experime ntthat m in imi z es $\ mat hscr{ M}_i(u , \rho,s )$ over t he set $\ m athcal{ U } $is e quivalent to sele c ti n g an experimen t that  m a xi m i zes  $( 1-\mathscr {M }_i(u , \rho,s) ) /s $ . Whe n  $s$ is small , this func t ion  can b eapp r oximat ed as  f o llo ws $$\begin {ali gned}
\fr ac{1-\ m athscr{ M }_i(u,\ rho,s) }{s } & = \f r ac {\ sum _{ j \ne q  i } ( { {\r ho}(j)}) ^s (1 -\mu_ j^i( u , s ) )}{s \su m_{j \neqi}  ({{\rho}( j)} )^s} \ \
& \appr ox \f rac{ \s um_{j \neq i } ({{ \r ho}(j)})^sD(p_i ^u|| p_j^u)}{\ sum _{ j\n eq  i} ( {{\rho }(j )}) ^s}\lab el{klds t rat }, \ e n d{ aligned}$$ since $ (1 - \ mu _j^i(u,s ))/s \ t oD( p _i^u||p_ j^ u)$  as$ s  \to0$.T hu s, we ca n inte r pr et  the st ra tegy D AS  in  te rms o f  the  zero- sum game  disc u ssed earlier i n  the beginnin g  o f Se c tion  \[ probformsub \] a f terDefi n it ion \[kld ef\].  I n  t h e zero-sum game, if  t he min imizi ng player sel ects an al t e r nate hyp othe s is $j$ with proba bilit y $\beta(j )  = (\rho (j))^ s/\sum_{ k\neq i}( \ r ho(k))^s $,the n t hes t ra tegy DAS sele c t s an  a pproxim ate  best-r esp ons e t o t he  minimizi ng playe r’ sst ra teg y wit h  respect  t o t he  pa yofff unctio n in(\[z er os u m\] ).

Giv e na hori zo n$N$,  th estrat egie s  DA S and D AS-RS des cri b ed i nth is sect ion are time- in variant. H ow eve r, the y depend o n the value of $s_N$ an d  thus,onthe h oriz on $N$ of  th e prob lem .  In so me cas es, t he ses t rateg i e stur nout to bei n dep enden tof t he valu e $s_N$ which resu l tsin fully
f^N, g^N)$,_then $\psi_N(i)_\geq 1- \epsilon_N$ for_every $N$_and_$$\begin{aligned}
\lim_{N \to_\infty}-\frac{1}{N}\log\phi_N(i)_= D^*(i).\end{aligned}$$

See Section_\[achievable\].

Note that selecting_an experiment that minimizes_$\mathscr{M}_i(u,\rho,s)$ over the_set_$\mathcal{U}$ is equivalent to selecting an experiment that maximizes $(1-\mathscr{M}_i(u,\rho,s))/s$. When $s$ is small,_this_function can_be_approximated_as follows $$\begin{aligned}
\frac{1-\mathscr{M}_i(u,\rho,s)}{s} &= \frac{\sum_{j\neq_i} ({{\rho}(j)})^s(1-\mu_j^i(u,s))}{s\sum_{j\neq i}  ({{\rho}(j)})^s}\\
&\approx_\frac{\sum_{j\neq i}_({{\rho}(j)})^sD(p_i^u||p_j^u)}{\sum_{j\neq i}  ({{\rho}(j)})^s}\label{kldstrat},\end{aligned}$$ since $(1-\mu_j^i(u,s))/s \to D(p_i^u||p_j^u)$_as_$s \to 0$._Thus, we can interpret the strategy DAS in terms_of the zero-sum game discussed earlier_in the beginning_of_Section_\[probformsub\] after Definition \[kldef\]._In the zero-sum game, if the_minimizing player selects an alternate hypothesis_$j$ with probability $\beta(j) = (\rho(j))^s/\sum_{k\neq i}(\rho(k))^s$,_then the strategy DAS selects an_approximate best-response to the minimizing_player’s strategy_with respect to the payoff_function in (\[zerosum\]).

Given_a horizon_$N$, the strategies_DAS and DAS-RS described in this_section are time-invariant._However, they depend on the value_of_$s_N$ and thus,_on_the_horizon $N$_of the problem._In_some cases,_these_strategies turn out to be independent_of_the value $s_N$ which results in fully