84 protocol. The essence of this protocol is that the communicators can freely select the message mode and the control mode. In BB84 protocol, when Alice and Bob want to transform $n$ bit message, it need about $4n$ qubit. On the other hand, comparing with the ‘ping-pong’ protocol, we use a single qubit to realize the deterministic secure direct communication instead of using entanglement. Also, there maybe a denial-of-service(DoS) attack in the line $A\rightarrow B$ \[14\]. But any method of message authentification can protect the protocol against man-in-the-middle attacks with a reliable public channel.

In order to be practical and secure, a quantum key distribution scheme must be based on existing—or nearly existing—technology \[15\]. Experimental quantum key distribution was demonstrated for first time by Bennett, et al \[16\]. Since then, single photon source have been studied in recent years and a great variety of approaches has been proposed and implemented \[17-22\]. Today, several groups have shown that quantum key distribution is possible, even outside the laboratory. In principle, any two-level quantum system could be used to implement quantum cryptography (QC). In practice, all implementations have relied on photons. The reason is that their decoherence can be controlled and moderated. The technological challenges of the QC are the questions of how to produce single photons, how to transmit them, how to detect single photons, and how to exploit the intrinsic randomness of quantum processes to build random generators \[23\]. Considered the experimental feasibility, our protocol needs a single photon source and some linear optical elements and a single-photon detector. Recently, the full implementation of a quantum cryptography protocol using a stream of a single photon pulses generated by a stable and efficient source operating at room temperature was reported \[24\]. The single pulses are emitted on demand and the secure bit rate is 7700bits/s. And quantum logic operations using linear optical elements can be realized with today’s technology \[25\]. The implementation of the single-photon detection technology for quantum cryptography have been reported \[26\] and the values of $\sigma _{x},\sigma
_{y},$ and $\sigma _{z}$ of a polarization qubit on a single photon can be ascertained \[27\].Considered the experimental feasibility, this protocol can be realized with today’s technology. It is explained that when this paper was completed, we see the protocol \[28\] presented by Deng $et$
84 protocol. The essence of this protocol is that the communicators can freely select the message mode and the restraint mood. In BB84 protocol, when Alice and Bob want to transform $ n$ bit message, it want about $ 4n$ qubit. On the other hired hand, comparing with the ‘ ping - pong ’ protocol, we practice a individual qubit to realize the deterministic dependable direct communication instead of use web. Also, there maybe a abnegation - of - service(DoS) attack in the line $ A\rightarrow B$ \[14\ ]. But any method acting of message authentification can protect the protocol against man - in - the - middle attacks with a authentic public channel. 

 In order to be hardheaded and secure, a quantum cardinal distribution scheme must be base on existing — or nearly existing — engineering \[15\ ]. Experimental quantum key distribution was demonstrated for first time by Bennett, et al \[16\ ]. Since then, single photon source have been studied in recent years and a great variety of approaches has been proposed and implemented \[17 - 22\ ]. Today, several groups have shown that quantum cardinal distribution is potential, even outside the laboratory. In principle, any two - level quantum arrangement could be used to implement quantum cryptography (QC). In exercise, all implementations have trust on photons. The reason is that their decoherence can be controlled and moderated. The technical challenges of the QC are the questions of how to produce single photons, how to transmit them, how to detect unmarried photons, and how to exploit the intrinsic randomness of quantum processes to build random generator \[23\ ]. Considered the experimental feasibility, our protocol necessitate a single photon source and some linear optical elements and a individual - photon detector. Recently, the full implementation of a quantum cryptography protocol use a stream of a single photon pulses generated by a static and efficient source operating at room temperature was reported \[24\ ]. The single pulsation are emitted on requirement and the secure snatch rate is 7700bits / s. And quantum logic operation using linear optical elements can be realized with today ’s engineering \[25\ ]. The implementation of the single - photon detection engineering for quantum cryptography have been reported \[26\ ] and the values of $ \sigma _ { x},\sigma 
 _ { y},$ and $ \sigma _ { z}$ of a polarization qubit on a single photon can be ascertain \[27\].Considered the experimental feasibility, this protocol can be recognize with today ’s technology. It is explained that when this newspaper was completed, we see the protocol \[28\ ] present by Deng $ et$
84 prltocol. The essence of thls protocol is tkqt the commuhicators can freely select the messaje mide abd the control mode. In BB84 protobol, when Qlict and Bob want to transfovi $n$ glt mevwage, it need anout $4n$ qubid. On the other hxnb, comparing with the ‘ping-pong’ protocjl, we uxe a single qubij to gewlizs the deterministic secure direct dommunibation instead of using entanglement. Also, tjere maybe a denial-of-sfrvice(DoS) ajfach in the line $A\rightarrow B$ \[14\]. But ani method of message authentificagion ean protect tye ototocol agaiist mag-in-the-middle attacks with a reliable publlc chenneo.

In order to be practmcal and secure, a quwntum key dnstribution scheme muwt be bdsed on dzisginf—oc nsarly fxiating—technklogy \[15\]. Expeeimental quantum keu qpxtribution wzs demjnftrated for first time by Bennett, et al \[16\]. Sjnce then, single photon source have been stufied in rqcent years and a great variety of approaches has been orokowed ave lmplemented \[17-22\]. Today, several groups have shown egau qlantum key distrinution is possible, egem outside the uaborackrg. In principle, any two-levgl quabtum systtm coild be used to implement quqntum cryptoyraphy (QC). In practice, all implemzntatipns hsve relied on photons. Tke reaaon is that their deduherence can be zonnrolned and moderated. The techgological chaklenges of jhe QC wre the qufstiokv of how to producf sinyle pvotons, how to transmit them, how to detect single photonx, dnd how to zxploib the intrinsic randomness of quantui prozesses to guild rendom generaeors \[23\]. Considesgd the experikental fqasiviliry, our ofotocol needs s single ihjton source and some llnear kptical elementw abd a single-photpn aetqcnor. Rqwently, the fgll kmpurmentxtion of a wjantim cryptography protmcol using a stream of a single khoton pujses generatec by a stable and tfficixnt sonrce olerwting at room temperature was deported \[24\]. Thc single pulsqs ave eiitted on bemand and the secure bit rate is 7700bits/s. End quantum logic operarions using linear pktical elemenvs can be realised with today’s techbology \[25\]. The implekentation of the singme-photmn dehection technology for quantum cryptography have been reported \[26\] and the vqlues of $\sigma _{x},\sifma
_{y},$ and $\viyma _{z}$ of w poperization qubit om a single photon can be ascerteined \[27\].Conshdzred the experimental feasibikigy, this protozol can be realized with today’s yechnology. It is explained that when this paper was comileted, we see fhe protocul \[28\] presented by Drng $et$
84 protocol. The essence of this protocol the can freely the message mode BB84 when Alice and want to transform bit message, it need about $4n$ On the other hand, comparing with the ‘ping-pong’ protocol, we use a single to realize the deterministic secure direct communication instead of using entanglement. Also, there a attack the $A\rightarrow B$ \[14\]. But any method of message authentification can protect the protocol against man-in-the-middle attacks a reliable public channel. In order to be and secure, a quantum distribution scheme must be based existing—or existing—technology \[15\]. quantum distribution demonstrated for first by Bennett, et al \[16\]. Since then, single photon source have been studied in recent years and great variety has been and \[17-22\]. several groups have quantum key distribution is possible, even In principle, any two-level quantum system could be to implement cryptography (QC). In practice, all implementations relied on photons. The reason is that their can be controlled and moderated. The technological challenges of the QC are the questions of produce single photons, how transmit them, how detect photons, how exploit the randomness of quantum processes to build random generators \[23\]. Considered the feasibility, our protocol needs a single photon source and some elements a single-photon detector. the full implementation of quantum protocol using a stream single pulses stable efficient operating at room temperature reported \[24\]. The single pulses emitted on demand and 7700bits/s. And quantum logic operations using linear optical can be realized with today’s technology \[25\]. implementation of the single-photon detection technology for quantum cryptography have been reported and the $\sigma _{x},\sigma _{y},$ and $\sigma _{z}$ of a qubit on a single can be ascertained \[27\].Considered the experimental feasibility, this protocol be with today’s It is explained when this paper completed, we see \[28\] presented Deng
84 protocol. The essence of this pRotocol is tHat thE coMmuNiCatoRs caN freely select tHE mesSage mode and the control mOde. In bB84 PRotoCOl, When ALice and bOb WANt tO tRaNsfOrM $N$ bIt mesSagE, it need About $4n$ qubiT. On ThE other hand, coMPaRing with thE ‘piNg-pong’ protocOl, wE use a sInGle QUbit tO reAlize The detERminisTic secure DiREct comMUnicatiON InSteaD of using entanglemENt. aLso, there maybe a Denial-Of-SErVICe(DOS) aTtack in the LiNe $A\riGHtarrow b$ \[14\]. buT ANY meTHod of message aUthentificaTIon Can proTeCt tHE protoCol agAiNSt mAn-in-the-middLe atTacks with A reliaBLe publiC Channel.

in ordeR to Be pRactICaL aNd sEcURe, a QUaNtuM Key DistribuTiOn SchemE musT BE BAsed On eXistIng—or Nearly existinG—teChnoLOgy \[15\]. experImentAl quAnTum keY distrIbutiOn Was demonstrated For fIrst time bY BeNnEtt, Et Al \[16\]. SinCE then, sIngLe pHoton soUrce havE BeeN sTUDIeD in recent years and a GrEAT vAriety of ApproaCHeS hAS been proPoSed And iMPLemenTed \[17-22\]. TODaY, several Groups HAvE sHown thaT qUantum KeY diStrIbutiON is pOssiblE, even outSide tHE laboratory. In pRInciple, any two-LEvEL QuANtum SysTem could be uSed tO ImplEmenT QuAntUM crypTograPhY (qC). iN practice, all implemeNtAtions Have rElied on photonS. The reason IS THat their DecoHErENce can be controLled aNd moderateD. the technOlogiCal challEnges of thE qc are the qUesTioNs oF hoW TO pRoduce single pHOTons, HoW to tranSmiT them, hoW to DetEct SinGlE photons, aNd how to eXpLoIt ThE inTrinsIC randomnEsS of QuAntUm proCEsses tO builD ranDoM gENerAtors \[23\]. CoNSiDERed tHe ExPeriMenTaL feasIbilITy, oUr protoCol needs a SinGLe phOtOn Source aNd some linear oPtIcal elemenTs And A singlE-PHoton detEctor. Recently, the full impLEmentatIon Of a quAntuM cryptogrAphY protoCol USing a sTream oF a sinGlE phOTOn pulSES gEneRaTed by a stabLE And EfficIeNt soUrce opeRating at room temperATurE was reported \[24\]. THe sInglE PUlSes ARe EMitTeD On dEMAnd and the secure Bit rate is 7700bItS/S. ANd quantum lOGic OpErationS using lInear OPtical eLements caN be realizEd With TODay’S technologY \[25\]. The implEmentatioN Of the SInGle-phOtoN detecTiOn tEchnoLogy foR QuaNtum cRyptogRaPhy havE been RePorted \[26\] anD the values of $\sigma _{x},\sigma
_{Y},$ and $\siGma _{z}$ oF a pOlarizatiOn qUBit On a single PhotOn can be ascErtAinEd \[27\].ConSidERed thE expERiMenTAl feaSibiLIty, this prOToCol CAN bE realized wiTH TOdaY’s tecHnoLOgy. It iS expLained that when thiS Paper was compleTed, wE SEe tHe pROtocOl \[28\] Presented by DenG $et$
84 protocol. The essence o f this pro tocol  is  th at  the  com municators can free ly select the messagemodean d  the co ntrol  mode.I nB B 84pr ot oco l, wh en Al ice  and Bo b want totra ns form $n$ bit me ssage, itnee d about $4n$  qu bit. O nthe other  ha nd, c ompari n g with  the ‘pin g- p ong’ p r otocol, w eusea single qubit to re a lize the deter minist ic se c u redir ect commun ic ation instead of u s ing entanglement.  Also, ther e  ma ybe ade nia l -of-se rvice (D o S)attack in t he l ine $A\ri ghtarr o w B$ \[ 1 4\]. Bu t anymet hod  ofm es sa geau t hen t if ica t ion  can pro te ct  theprot o c o l  aga ins t ma n-in- the-middle at tac ks w i tha rel iable  pub li c cha nnel.
In o rd er to be practi caland secur e,aqua nt um ke y  distr ibu tio n schem e mustb e b as e d on  existing—or nearl ye x is ting—tec hnolog y  \ [1 5 \]. Expe ri men talq u antum  key di stributi on was de mo nstrate dfor fi rs t t ime  by B e nnet t, etal \[16\ ]. Si n ce then, singl e  photon sourc e  h a v eb eenstu died in rec enty ears  and agre a t var ietyof ap p roaches has been pr op osed a nd im plemented \[1 7-22\]. To d a y , severa l gr o up s  have shown th at qu antum keyd istribut ion i s possib le, eveno u tside th e l abo rat ory . In  principle, a n y  two -l evel qu ant um syst emcou ldbeus ed to imp lement q ua nt um  c ryp togra p hy (QC).  I n p ra cti ce, a l l impl ement atio ns  h a vereliedo np h oton s.  T he r eas on  is t hatt hei r decoh erence ca n b e  con tr ol led and  moderated. T he  technolog ic alchalle n g es of th e QC are the questionso f how t o p roduc e si ngle phot ons , howtot ransmi t them , how  t o d e t ect s i n gl e p ho tons, andh o w t o exp lo it t he intr insic randomness o f  qu antum process esto b u i ld  ra n do m  ge ne r ato r s  \[23\]. Consid ered the e xp e ri mental fea s ibi li ty, our  protoc ol ne e ds a si ngle phot on source  a nd s o m e l inear opti cal elem ents anda  sing l e- photo n d etecto r.  Re centl y, the ful l imp lement at ion of  a qu an tum cryp tography protocol using  a str eam o f a  single p hot o n p ulses gen erat ed by a st abl e a nd ef fic i ent s ourc e  o per a tingat r o om temper a tu rew a sreported \[ 2 4 \ ].The s ing l e puls es a re emitted on dem a nd and the sec ureb i t r ate is 7 70 0bits/s. And q uan tu m logic op er ations usin g linear  o p tical  eleme nts ca n be re a l iz e d with  tod ay’ s technol ogy  \ [ 25\]. T he  i m plemen tati on  of th e sing l e-ph o t on detection tec hnolo g y  forq uan tum c ry ptograp h y ha ve been re ported \[26 \] and  the  valu es of $ \s igma _ {x} ,\ sigma
_{y} , $ and $\s igma_{z}$ o fa po lar izatio n qu b i t ona si ng lephoton ca n be as ce r tai ned\[27\ ]. Cons idered th e  experim ent a l feasi bi lit y ,  thisp ro t o col can be  re alize d with today ’ s te c hn o logy.  It is  expla ined th a t w he n thispap e r  was comp leted, we see  t he p rotocol\[ 28\]  p res en ted by Deng $et $
84 protocol._The essence_of this protocol is_that the_communicators_can freely_select_the message mode_and the control_mode. In BB84 protocol,_when Alice and_Bob_want to transform $n$ bit message, it need about $4n$ qubit. On the other_hand,_comparing with_the_‘ping-pong’_protocol, we use a single_qubit to realize the deterministic_secure direct_communication instead of using entanglement. Also, there maybe_a_denial-of-service(DoS) attack in_the line $A\rightarrow B$ \[14\]. But any method of_message authentification can protect the protocol_against man-in-the-middle attacks_with_a_reliable public channel.

In order_to be practical and secure, a_quantum key distribution scheme must be_based on existing—or nearly existing—technology \[15\]. Experimental_quantum key distribution was demonstrated for_first time by Bennett, et_al \[16\]._Since then, single photon source_have been studied_in recent_years and a_great variety of approaches has been_proposed and implemented_\[17-22\]. Today, several groups have shown_that_quantum key distribution_is_possible,_even outside_the laboratory. In_principle,_any two-level_quantum_system could be used to implement_quantum_cryptography (QC). In practice, all implementations have_relied on photons. The_reason_is that their decoherence_can be controlled and moderated._The technological challenges of the QC_are the_questions of_how to produce single photons, how to transmit them, how to_detect single photons, and how to_exploit the intrinsic randomness_of quantum_processes_to build random_generators_\[23\]. Considered_the experimental feasibility, our protocol needs a_single photon_source and some linear optical elements_and a single-photon detector._Recently,_the full implementation of a quantum_cryptography protocol using a stream of_a single photon pulses generated_by_a_stable and efficient source operating_at room temperature was reported \[24\]._The single pulses_are emitted on demand and the secure_bit_rate is 7700bits/s. And quantum logic_operations_using linear optical elements can be_realized_with_today’s technology \[25\]. The implementation_of the single-photon detection technology for_quantum cryptography have been reported \[26\] and the values_of $\sigma _{x},\sigma
_{y},$_and $\sigma _{z}$ of a_polarization_qubit_on a single photon can be ascertained \[27\].Considered the experimental_feasibility, this_protocol can be_realized with today’s technology. It is explained that when this_paper was completed, we see the protocol_\[28\] presented by Deng $et$