 boson space $$T^{B}(M1) = \sqrt{\frac{3}{4\pi}}(g_{\pi}\hat{L}_{\pi} +
g_{\nu}\hat{L}_{\nu})\mu_{N},$$ with $g_l$, $g_s$ being the fermion orbital and spin $g$-factors and $g_{\pi}$, $g_{\nu}$ the respective proton and neutron boson $g$ factors. The quantities $\hat{L}_{\pi}$ and $\hat{L}_{\nu}$ are the corresponding orbital angular momentum operators of the proton and neutron boson system.

In IBM-2 studies, concentrating on deformed nuclei, one is using the SU(3) reduction of the U(6) group structure and, for those nuclei, it was shown that the lowest-lying states of the family of mixed-symmetry character were characterized by the $F_{max} -1, J^{\pi} = 1^{+}$ quantum numbers [@Iachello:1981; @Iachello:1984]. These findings corroborate results obtained from a totally different starting point, viz. the TRM. The IBM-2 $J^{\pi} = 1^{+}$ states are also called scissors states although there is no immediate reference in the algebraic formulation to specific coordinate forms and thus also not of shapes and shape dynamics. Using a coherent-state formalism, @Dieperink:1983 was able to show the correspondence explicitly and, moreover, found indeed that only the valence nucleons are contributing to the strength of the scissors mode thus leading in a natural way to a much lower $B(M1)$ strength compared to the early TRM calculations.

In studying the $M1$ excitation properties within the IBM-2, because of the specific difference in magnetization properties for proton and neutron bosons, it was clear that $M1$ transitions could appear naturally now, in contrast to the former IBM-1. Using mapping from fermion magnetic properties onto boson ones, it was possible to also determine the analogous boson $g_{\pi}$ and $g_{\nu}$ factors [@Sambataro:1981; @Sambataro:1984; @Allaart:1988]. This item has been a topic of much discussion because the mapping calculations all seem to come up more or less with values $g_{\pi}\simeq 1$ $\mu_{N}$ and $g_{\pi}\simeq 0$ $\mu_{N}$ but empirical fits in various mass regions have indicated
boson space $ $ T^{B}(M1) = \sqrt{\frac{3}{4\pi}}(g_{\pi}\hat{L}_{\pi } + 
 g_{\nu}\hat{L}_{\nu})\mu_{N},$$ with $ g_l$, $ g_s$ being the fermion orbital and spin $ g$-factors and $ g_{\pi}$, $ g_{\nu}$ the respective proton and neutron boson $ g$ factors. The quantities $ \hat{L}_{\pi}$ and $ \hat{L}_{\nu}$ are the correspond orbital angular momentum operator of the proton and neutron boson system. 

 In IBM-2 studies, concentrating on deformed nuclei, one is use the SU(3) reduction of the U(6) group structure and, for those nucleus, it was show that the lowest - lying state of the family of mixed - isotropy character were characterized by the $ F_{max } -1, J^{\pi } = 1^{+}$ quantum numbers [ @Iachello:1981; @Iachello:1984 ]. These findings confirm results obtained from a totally different starting detail, viz.   the TRM. The IBM-2 $ J^{\pi } = 1^{+}$ states are also called scissors state although there is no immediate reference in the algebraic formulation to specific coordinate form and thus also not of shapes and shape dynamics. use a coherent - state formalism, @Dieperink:1983 was able to show the correspondence explicitly and, moreover, found indeed that merely the valence nucleons are contributing to the strength of the scissors mode thus leading in a natural way to a much lower $ B(M1)$ strength compare to the early TRM calculations. 

 In studying the $ M1 $ excitement place within the IBM-2, because of the specific remainder in magnetization properties for proton and neutron bosons, it was clear that $ M1 $ transitions could appear naturally now, in contrast to the erstwhile IBM-1. Using mapping from fermion magnetic properties onto boson ones, it was possible to besides determine the analogous boson $ g_{\pi}$ and $ g_{\nu}$ factors [ @Sambataro:1981; @Sambataro:1984; @Allaart:1988 ]. This item has been a topic of much discussion because the mapping calculations all seem to total up more or less with values $ g_{\pi}\simeq 1 $ $ \mu_{N}$ and $ g_{\pi}\simeq 0 $ $ \mu_{N}$ but empirical fits in various mass region have indicated
 bodon space $$T^{B}(M1) = \sqrt{\frac{3}{4\pl}}(g_{\pi}\hat{L}_{\pi} +
g_{\nu}\haj{L}_{\bu})\mu_{N},$$ xith $g_l$, $g_s$ beine the fermion orbital and spmn $g$-dactoes and $g_{\pi}$, $g_{\nu}$ the resoective pgoton and neuuron boson $g$ factors. The quantifles $\hct{O}_{\pi}$ and $\hat{L}_{\nu}$ are the cmrresponding osbktcl angular momentum operators of the proton ajd neutron bosjn sjseem.

Ih IBM-2 studies, concentrating on defkrmed nlclei, one is usinb the SU(3) reduction of the K(6) grlup structure and, vor those nodley, it was showv that the lowest-lying states of the family of mixed-shmmetxy charactet segg characterived by the $F_{max} -1, J^{\ip} = 1^{+}$ quattum nukbers [@Iachello:1981; @Iarheloo:1984]. These findings corcoborate results obtwined frok c totally different sraeting poitt, vkz. thd TDM. Tge IBM-2 $J^{\pm} = 1^{+}$ states zre also caoled scissors statex wothough there is no iimediate reference in the algebraic forkulztion to specific coordunate forms and thus wlso not jf shapes and shape dynamics. Using a coherent-stata forjxliwm, @Aueoerink:1983 was able to show the correspondence ex[mivinly and, moreover, nound indeed that pnpy jhe valence nuzleons ars contributing to hhe strgngth if the scyssots mode thus leading in a nqtural way tj a much lower $B(M1)$ scrength compcred tp the early TRM calculations.

Nn stusying the $M1$ excitatikv properties witfin tve IBM-2, btzause of the specyfic diffxrencz in magvetieation [roperties for isoton and neutron hosond, ht was clewr that $M1$ transitions could appxer naturally mof, it contraft to the former IFM-1. Using mappiug from yermiov magnetic propervies onto bofon ones, it wdd possible tm also dqternine the anxuogous boson $g_{\li}$ and $g_{\nl}$ yactors [@Sqmbataro:1981; @Sambataro:1984; @Aluzart:1988]. This item kcs been a topic og mjch dpscnssiog because the mapoine calcjlations alo seek to come up more or lesa with values $g_{\pi}\somcq 1$ $\mu_{N}$ abd $g_{\pi}\siieq 0$ $\mu_{N}$ but rmpirical fits in garions masr regoonf have indicated
boson space $$T^{B}(M1) = \sqrt{\frac{3}{4\pi}}(g_{\pi}\hat{L}_{\pi} + g_{\nu}\hat{L}_{\nu})\mu_{N},$$ $g_s$ the fermion and spin $g$-factors proton neutron boson $g$ The quantities $\hat{L}_{\pi}$ $\hat{L}_{\nu}$ are the corresponding orbital angular operators of the proton and neutron boson system. In IBM-2 studies, concentrating on nuclei, one is using the SU(3) reduction of the U(6) group structure and, those it shown the lowest-lying states of the family of mixed-symmetry character were characterized by the $F_{max} -1, J^{\pi} 1^{+}$ quantum numbers [@Iachello:1981; @Iachello:1984]. These findings corroborate obtained from a totally starting point, viz. the TRM. IBM-2 = 1^{+}$ are called states although there no immediate reference in the algebraic formulation to specific coordinate forms and thus also not of shapes shape dynamics. coherent-state formalism, was to the correspondence explicitly found indeed that only the valence to the strength of the scissors mode thus in a way to a much lower $B(M1)$ compared to the early TRM calculations. In studying $M1$ excitation properties within the IBM-2, because of the specific difference in magnetization properties for neutron bosons, it was that $M1$ transitions appear now, contrast the former Using mapping from fermion magnetic properties onto boson ones, it was to also determine the analogous boson $g_{\pi}$ and $g_{\nu}$ factors @Allaart:1988]. item has been topic of much discussion the calculations all seem to more less 1$ and 0$ $\mu_{N}$ but empirical in various mass regions have
 boson space $$T^{B}(M1) = \sqrt{\frac{3}{4\pi}}(g_{\pI}\hat{L}_{\pi} +
g_{\nu}\Hat{L}_{\nU})\mu_{n},$$ wiTh $G_l$, $g_s$ BeinG the fermion orbITal aNd spin $g$-factors and $g_{\pi}$, $g_{\nU}$ the rEsPEctiVE pRoton And neutROn BOSon $G$ fAcTorS. THE qUantiTieS $\hat{L}_{\pi}$ And $\hat{L}_{\nu}$ aRe tHe CorrespondinG OrBital angulAr mOmentum operaTorS of the PrOtoN And neUtrOn bosOn systEM.

In IBM-2 Studies, coNcENtratiNG on defoRMEd NuclEi, one is using the SU(3) REdUCtion of the U(6) groUp struCtURe AND, foR thOse nuclei, iT wAs shoWN that thE LoWEST-lyINg states of the Family of mixED-syMmetry ChAraCTer werE charAcTEriZed by the $F_{maX} -1, J^{\pi} = 1^{+}$ Quantum nuMbers [@IAChello:1981; @IAChello:1984]. THese fiNdiNgs CorrOBoRaTe rEsULts OBtAinED frOm a totalLy DiFfereNt stARTINg poInt, Viz. tHe TRM. the IBM-2 $J^{\pi} = 1^{+}$ statEs aRe alSO caLled sCissoRs stAtEs altHough tHere iS nO immediate referEnce In the algeBraIc ForMuLatioN To specIfiC coOrdinatE forms aND thUs ALSO nOt of shapes and shape DyNAMiCs. Using a CohereNT-sTaTE formaliSm, @diePeriNK:1983 Was abLe to SHoW the corrEspondENcE eXplicitLy And, morEoVer, FouNd indEEd thAt only The valenCe nucLEons are contribUTing to the streNGtH OF tHE sciSsoRs mode thus lEadiNG in a NatuRAl Way TO a mucH loweR $B(m1)$ StREngth compared to the eArLy TRM cAlculAtions.

In studyIng the $M1$ excITATion propErtiES wIThin the IBM-2, becaUse of The specifiC DifferenCe in mAgnetizaTion propeRTIes for prOtoN anD neUtrON BoSons, it was cleaR THat $M1$ TrAnsitioNs cOuld appEar NatUraLly NoW, in contraSt to the fOrMeR IbM-1. usiNg mapPIng from fErMioN mAgnEtic pROpertiEs ontO bosOn OnES, it Was possIBlE TO alsO dEtErmiNe tHe AnaloGous BOsoN $g_{\pi}$ and $G_{\nu}$ factorS [@SaMBataRo:1981; @saMbataro:1984; @allaart:1988]. This itEm Has been a toPiC of Much diSCUssion beCause the mapping calculatIOns all sEem To comE up mOre or less WitH valueS $g_{\pI}\Simeq 1$ $\mU_{N}$ and $g_{\Pi}\simEq 0$ $\Mu_{N}$ BUT empiRICaL fiTs In various mASS reGions HaVe inDicated
 boson space $$T^{B}(M1) =  \sqrt{\fr ac{3} {4\ pi} }( g_{\ pi}\ hat{L}_{\pi} + g_{\ nu}\hat{L}_{\nu})\mu_{ N},$$  w i th $ g _l $, $g _s$ bei n gt h e f er mi onor b it al an d s pin $g$ -factors a nd$g _{\pi}$, $g_ { \n u}$ the re spe ctive proton  an d neut ro n b o son $ g$facto rs. Th e  quant ities $\h at { L}_{\p i }$ and$ \ ha t{L} _{\nu}$ are the c o rr e sponding orbit al ang ul a rm o men tum  operators  o f the protona nd n e utr o n boson syste m.

In IBM- 2  st udies,  c onc e ntrati ng on  d e for med nuclei,  one  is using  the S U (3) red u ction o f theU(6 ) g roup st ru ctu re and ,  f ort hos e nuclei ,it  wasshow n t h at t helowe st-ly ing states of  th e fa m ily  of m ixed- symm et ry ch aracte r wer echaracterized b y th e $F_{max } - 1,  J^ {\ pi} = 1^{+}$  qu ant um numb ers [@I a che ll o : 1 98 1; @Iachello:1984] .T h es e findin gs cor r ob or a te resul ts  ob tain e d  from  a t o ta lly diff erents ta rt ing poi nt , viz.  t heTRM . The IBM- 2 $J^{ \pi} = 1 ^{+}$ states are als o  called sciss o rs s ta t es a lth ough thereis n o  imm edia t eref e rence  in t he al g ebraic formulationto  speci fic c oordinate for ms and thu s a lso notof s h ap e s and shape dy namic s. Using a coherent -stat e formal ism, @Die p e rink:198 3 w asabl e t o sh ow the corres p o nden ce  explic itl y and,mor eov er,  fo un d indeedthat onl yth eva len ce nu c leons ar econ tr ibu tingt o thestren gthof  t h e s cissors mo d e  thu sle adin g i na nat ural way  to a m uch lower  $B ( M1)$  s tr ength c ompared to th eearly TRMca lcu lation s . 

In stu dying the $M1$ excitati o n prope rti es wi thin  the IBM- 2,becaus e o f  the s pecifi c dif fe ren c e  in m a g ne tiz at ion proper t i esfor p ro tonand neu tron bosons, it wa s  cl ear that $M1$  tr ansi t i on s c o ul d  ap pe a r n a t urally now, incontrast t ot he  former IB M -1.  U sing ma pping f rom f e rmion m agnetic p roperties  o ntob o son  ones, itwas poss ible to a l so de t er minethe  analo go usboson  $g_{\ p i}$  and$g_{\n u} $ fact ors [ @S ambataro :1981; @Sambataro:1984;  @Alla art:1 988 ]. This i tem has  been a t opic  of much d isc uss ion b eca u se th e ma p pi ngc alcul atio n s all see m  t o c o m eup more orl e s s w ith v alu e s $g_{ \pi} \simeq 1$ $\mu_{N } $ and $g_{\pi} \sim e q  0$  $\ m u_{N }$  but empirical  fi ts i n variou smass region s have i nd i cated 
 boson_space $$T^{B}(M1)_= \sqrt{\frac{3}{4\pi}}(g_{\pi}\hat{L}_{\pi} +
g_{\nu}\hat{L}_{\nu})\mu_{N},$$ with_$g_l$, $g_s$_being_the fermion_orbital_and spin $g$-factors_and $g_{\pi}$, $g_{\nu}$_the respective proton and_neutron boson $g$_factors._The quantities $\hat{L}_{\pi}$ and $\hat{L}_{\nu}$ are the corresponding orbital angular momentum operators of the_proton_and neutron_boson_system.

In_IBM-2 studies, concentrating on deformed_nuclei, one is using the_SU(3) reduction_of the U(6) group structure and, for those_nuclei,_it was shown_that the lowest-lying states of the family of mixed-symmetry_character were characterized by the $F_{max}_-1, J^{\pi} =_1^{+}$_quantum_numbers [@Iachello:1981; @Iachello:1984]. These_findings corroborate results obtained from a_totally different starting point, viz. the TRM._The IBM-2 $J^{\pi} = 1^{+}$ states are_also called scissors states although there_is no immediate reference in_the algebraic_formulation to specific coordinate forms_and thus also_not of_shapes and shape_dynamics. Using a coherent-state formalism, @Dieperink:1983_was able to_show the correspondence explicitly and, moreover,_found_indeed that only_the_valence_nucleons are_contributing to the_strength_of the_scissors_mode thus leading in a natural_way_to a much lower $B(M1)$ strength compared_to the early TRM_calculations.

In_studying the $M1$ excitation_properties within the IBM-2, because_of the specific difference in magnetization_properties for_proton and_neutron bosons, it was clear that $M1$ transitions could appear naturally_now, in contrast to the former_IBM-1. Using mapping from_fermion magnetic_properties_onto boson ones,_it_was possible_to also determine the analogous boson $g_{\pi}$_and $g_{\nu}$_factors [@Sambataro:1981; @Sambataro:1984; @Allaart:1988]. This item_has been a topic_of_much discussion because the mapping calculations_all seem to come up more_or less with values $g_{\pi}\simeq_1$_$\mu_{N}$_and $g_{\pi}\simeq 0$ $\mu_{N}$ but_empirical fits in various mass regions_have indicated