 been proposed to measure the Majorana fermions [@fu2009a; @tanaka2009a; @fu2009b; @akhmerov2009; @law2009; @lutchyn2010; @chung2011]. Here, we base our discussion on a recent proposal studying the CMEM backscattering [@chung2011]. The basic setup is shown in Fig. \[fig1\], consisting of a magnetic TI in proximity with a grounded top SC layer in region II and two current leads at the corners. When the magnetic domains of magnetic TI are aligned in the same direction, the magnetic TI is in a QAH state with a single chiral edge state propagating along the sample boundary. During the flipping of the magnetic domains at the coercive field, $\lambda$ decreases and the magnetic TI enters the NI with a zero-plateau in Hall conductance $\sigma_{xy}$ over a finite range of magnetic field [@wang2014a; @fengy2015; @kou2015], as shown in Fig. \[fig3\]b. Either perpendicular or in plane external magnetic field could induce such plateau transition [@kou2015]. When the SC proximity effect is sufficiently strong, the superconducting region II experiences the BdG Chern number variation $\mathcal{N}=-2\rightarrow-1\rightarrow0\rightarrow1\rightarrow2$ as $\lambda$ decreases in the hysteresis loop (dashed line in Fig. \[fig3\]a). Therefore, the transport setup Fig. \[fig1\] is a QAH/NI-TSC/NSC-QAH/NI junction. As we will discuss in details below, the edge transport features of the junction uniquely convey the topological properties of the SC in region II.

The QAH edge state can be viewed as two CMEMs since a $\mathcal{C}=1$ QAH state is topologically equivalent to a $\mathcal{N}=2$ TSC. Therefore, in the case of QAH$_{\mathcal{C}=1}$-TSC$_{\mathcal{N}=2}$-QAH$_{\mathcal{C}=1}$ junction (Fig. \[fig3\]j), the edge current will be perfectly transmitted. By contrast, if the junction is QAH$_{\mathcal{C}=1}$-TSC$_{\mathcal{N}=1}$-QAH$_{\mathcal{C}=1}$ (Fig. \[fig3\]i), the chiral edge state in the QAH region separates into two CMEMs at the T
been proposed to measure the Majorana fermions   [ @fu2009a; @tanaka2009a; @fu2009b; @akhmerov2009; @law2009; @lutchyn2010; @chung2011 ]. Here, we base our discussion on a late marriage proposal study the CMEM backscattering   [ @chung2011 ]. The basic setup is shown in Fig.   \[fig1\ ], consist of a magnetic TI in proximity with a grounded top scandium layer in region II and two current lead at the corners. When the magnetic world of magnetic TI are aligned in the same commission, the magnetic TI is in a QAH department of state with a single chiral edge state of matter propagating along the sample boundary. During the flipping of the charismatic domains at the coercive field, $ \lambda$ decrease and the magnetic TI enter the NI with a zero - plateau in Hall conductance $ \sigma_{xy}$ over a finite range of magnetic field   [ @wang2014a; @fengy2015; @kou2015 ], as shown in Fig.   \[fig3\]b. Either vertical or in plane external magnetic field could induce such plateau transition   [ @kou2015 ]. When the SC proximity effect is sufficiently solid, the superconducting area II experiences the BdG Chern number variation $ \mathcal{N}=-2\rightarrow-1\rightarrow0\rightarrow1\rightarrow2 $ as $ \lambda$ decreases in the hysteresis loop (dashed line in Fig.   \[fig3\]a). consequently, the transport apparatus Fig.   \[fig1\ ] is a QAH / NI - TSC / NSC - QAH / NI junction. As we will discuss in details downstairs, the edge transport features of the articulation uniquely convey the topological property of the SC in region II. 

 The QAH edge department of state can be viewed as two CMEMs since a $ \mathcal{C}=1 $ QAH state is topologically equivalent to a $ \mathcal{N}=2 $ TSC. Therefore, in the case of QAH$_{\mathcal{C}=1}$-TSC$_{\mathcal{N}=2}$-QAH$_{\mathcal{C}=1}$ junction (Fig.   \[fig3\]j), the edge current will be perfectly transmitted. By contrast, if the junction is QAH$_{\mathcal{C}=1}$-TSC$_{\mathcal{N}=1}$-QAH$_{\mathcal{C}=1}$ (Fig.   \[fig3\]i), the chiral edge department of state in the QAH region branch into two CMEMs at the T
 befn proposed to measure tme Majorana fermnins [@fu2009a; @tanakz2009a; @fu2009b; @ayhmerov2009; @law2009; @lutchyn2010; @chung2011]. Hece, ww bast our discussion on a recent proposao stndying the CMEM uzckscatbzring [@dmung2011]. Chx basic setup ix shown in Fig. \[fig1\], consisdivg of a magnetic TI in proximity with a groumdfd top SC layet in gedion PI and two current leads at the cornerv. When the mabnetic domains of magnetic TI wre aligned in the same direcjjon, rhe magnetic TI is in a QAH state sith a single chiral edge state propcgating alobg thf sample bouidary. Quring the flipping mf the kagnetic domaiks at thw coercive field, $\lambva$ decreases and the magnetic TN enters the NI with q zero-pnatedu iv Haul doidudtance $\sijma_{xy}$ over z finite rabge of magnetic fiekd [@rqng2014a; @fengy2015; @koh2015], as srorn in Fig. \[fig3\]b. Either perpendicular or it pmane external magnetic dield could induce sufh plateat transition [@kou2015]. When the SC proximity effect is sgfficmevtlv strovt, hhe superconducting region II experiences the GdB Bhern number variction $\mathcal{N}=-2\ribhhattow-1\rightarrow0\rkghtarxkw1\dightarrow2$ as $\lambfa$ decrgases un the hyfterrsis loop (dashed line in Fit. \[fig3\]a). Therefjee, the transport sztup Fig. \[fig1\] ns a QSH/NI-TXC/NSC-QAH/NI junction. As ce wilm discuss ij details celow, the edge tfanxpmrt features of the junctijn uniqueoy cpnvey tfe tppologycal propegties of the SC in regioj II.

Tke QAV edge stahe can be viewed as two CMEMs smice a $\mathcal{V}=1$ XAH state if topplogically eqtivalent to a $\kathcal{U}=2$ TSC. Gherefore, pn the cave of QAH$_{\maehcal{C}=1}$-TSC$_{\mathwwl{N}=2}$-QAH$_{\mathcan{C}=1}$ junctyon (Dig. \[fug3\]j), the ddge current woll be pegftctly tranwmitted. By contrasb, if jhs junction is QCK$_{\mqthcal{C}=1}$-TSC$_{\mathcsl{N}=1}$-DAH$_{\ianhcel{C}=1}$ (Fyc. \[fig3\]i), the chhral eder stage in the QCH regoon separates into tfo CJEMs at the T
been proposed to measure the Majorana fermions @fu2009b; @law2009; @lutchyn2010; Here, we base proposal the CMEM backscattering The basic setup shown in Fig. \[fig1\], consisting of magnetic TI in proximity with a grounded top SC layer in region II two current leads at the corners. When the magnetic domains of magnetic TI aligned the direction, magnetic TI is in a QAH state with a single chiral edge state propagating along the boundary. During the flipping of the magnetic domains the coercive field, $\lambda$ and the magnetic TI enters NI a zero-plateau Hall $\sigma_{xy}$ a finite range magnetic field [@wang2014a; @fengy2015; @kou2015], as shown in Fig. \[fig3\]b. Either perpendicular or in plane external magnetic could induce transition [@kou2015]. the proximity is sufficiently strong, region II experiences the BdG Chern as $\lambda$ decreases in the hysteresis loop (dashed in Fig. Therefore, the transport setup Fig. \[fig1\] a QAH/NI-TSC/NSC-QAH/NI junction. As we will discuss in below, the edge transport features of the junction uniquely convey the topological properties of the region II. The QAH state can be as CMEMs a QAH state topologically equivalent to a $\mathcal{N}=2$ TSC. Therefore, in the case of junction (Fig. \[fig3\]j), the edge current will be perfectly transmitted. if junction is QAH$_{\mathcal{C}=1}$-TSC$_{\mathcal{N}=1}$-QAH$_{\mathcal{C}=1}$ \[fig3\]i), the chiral edge in QAH region separates into at T
 been proposed to measure the MAjorana ferMions [@Fu2009a; @TanAkA2009a; @fu2009B; @akhMerov2009; @law2009; @lutchyN2010; @ChunG2011]. Here, we base our discussiOn on a ReCEnt pROpOsal sTudying THe cmeM bAcKsCatTeRInG [@chunG2011]. ThE basic sEtup is showN in fiG. \[fig1\], consistiNG oF a magnetic tI iN proximity wiTh a GroundEd Top sc layeR in RegioN II and TWo currEnt leads aT tHE corneRS. When thE MAgNetiC domains of magnetiC tI ARe aligned in the Same diReCTiON, The MagNetic TI is iN a qAH stATe with a SInGLE ChiRAl edge state prOpagating alONg tHe sampLe BouNDary. DuRing tHe FLipPing of the maGnetIc domains At the cOErcive fIEld, $\lambDa$ decrEasEs aNd thE MaGnEtiC Ti EntERs The ni wiTh a zero-pLaTeAu in HAll cONDUCtanCe $\sIgma_{Xy}$ oveR a finite range Of mAgneTIc fIeld [@wAng2014a; @fEngy2015; @KoU2015], as shOwn in FIg. \[fig3\]B. EIther perpendicuLar oR in plane eXteRnAl mAgNetic FIeld coUld IndUce such Plateau TRanSiTION [@kOu2015]. When the SC proximiTy EFFeCt is suffIcientLY sTrONg, the supErConDuctING regiOn II EXpEriences The BdG cHeRn Number vArIation $\MaThcAl{N}=-2\RightARrow-1\RightaRrow0\righTarroW1\Rightarrow2$ as $\laMBda$ decreases iN ThE HYsTEresIs lOop (dashed liNe in fIg. \[fiG3\]a). ThEReForE, The trAnspoRt SEtUP Fig. \[fig1\] is a QAH/NI-TSC/NsC-qAH/NI jUnctiOn. As we will disCuss in detaILS Below, the Edge TRaNSport features oF the jUnction uniQUely convEy the TopologiCal properTIEs of the Sc in RegIon iI.

THE qAh edge state can BE ViewEd As two CMeMs Since a $\mAthCal{c}=1$ QAh stAtE is topoloGically eQuIvAlEnT to A $\mathCAl{N}=2$ TSC. ThErEfoRe, In tHe casE Of QAH$_{\mAthcaL{C}=1}$-TSc$_{\mAtHCal{n}=2}$-QAH$_{\matHCaL{c}=1}$ JuncTiOn (fig. \[fIg3\]j), ThE edge CurrENt wIll be peRfectly trAnsMItteD. BY cOntrast, If the junction Is qAH$_{\mathcal{c}=1}$-TsC$_{\mAthcal{n}=1}$-qaH$_{\mathcaL{C}=1}$ (Fig. \[fig3\]i), the chiral edge sTAte in thE QAh regiOn seParates inTo tWo CMEMS at THe T
 been proposed to measurethe Majora na fe rmi ons  [ @fu2 009a ; @tanaka2009a ;  @fu 2009b; @akhmerov2009;@law2 00 9 ; @l u tc hyn20 10; @ch u ng 2 0 11] .He re,  w e  b ase o urdiscuss ion on a r ece nt  proposal st u dy ing the CM EMbackscatteri ng[@chun g2 011 ] . The  ba sic s etup i s  shown  in Fig.\[ f ig1\], consist i n gof a  magnetic TI in p r ox i mity with a gr ounded  t o pS C  la yer  in region  I I and two cur r en t l ead s  at the corne rs. When th e  ma gnetic  d oma i ns ofmagne ti c  TI  are aligne d in  the same  direc t ion, th e  magnet ic TIisina QA H  s ta tewi t h a si ngl e  ch iral edg est ate p ropa g a t i ng a lon g th e sam ple boundary.  Du ring the  flip pingof t he  magn etic d omain sat the coercive  fie ld, $\lam bda $dec re asesa nd the  ma gne tic TIenterst heNI w i th  a zero-plateau in  H a l lconducta nce $\ s ig ma _ {xy}$ ov er  afini t e  rang e of ma gnetic f ield [ @ wa ng 2014a;@f engy20 15 ; @ kou 2015] ,  asshownin Fig.\[fig 3 \]b. Either pe r pendicular or in p la n e ex ter nal magneti c fi e ld c ould in duc e  such  plat ea u  t r ansition [@kou2015] .When t he SC  proximity ef fect is su f f i cientlystro n g, the supercondu cting  region II experien ces t he BdG C hern numb e r  variati on$\m ath cal { N }= -2\rightarrow - 1 \rig ht arrow0\ rig htarrow 1\r igh tar row 2$  as $\lam bda$ dec re as es  i n t he hy s teresislo op(d ash ed li n e in F ig. \ [fig 3\ ]a ) . T herefor e ,t h e tr an sp ortset up  Fig.  \[f i g1\ ] is aQAH/NI-TS C/N S C-QA H/ NI  juncti on. As we wil ldiscuss in  d eta ils be l o w, the e dge transport featureso f the j unc tionuniq uely conv eythe to pol o gicalproper tiesof  th e SC in r eg ion  I I.

The QA H edg e sta te  can  be vie wed as two CMEMs s i nce  a $\mathcal{ C}= 1$ Q A H  s tat e  i s  to po l ogi c a lly equivalentto a $\mat hc a l{ N}=2$ TSC. The re fore, i n the c ase o f  QAH$_{ \mathcal{ C}=1}$-TS C$ _{\m a t hca l{N}=2}$-Q AH$_{\ma thcal{C}= 1 }$ ju n ct ion ( Fig . \[fi g3 \]j ), th e edge cur rentwill b eperfec tly t ra nsmitted . By contrast, if the j unctio n isQAH $_{\mathc al{ C }=1 }$-TSC$_{ \mat hcal{N}=1} $-Q AH$ _{\ma thc a l{C}= 1}$( Fi g.\ [fig3 \]i) ,  the chir a ledg e st ate in theQ A H  re gionsep a ratesinto  two CMEMs at the T
 been_proposed to_measure the Majorana fermions [@fu2009a;_@tanaka2009a; @fu2009b;_@akhmerov2009;_@law2009; @lutchyn2010;_@chung2011]._Here, we base_our discussion on_a recent proposal studying_the CMEM backscattering [@chung2011]._The_basic setup is shown in Fig. \[fig1\], consisting of a magnetic TI in proximity with_a_grounded top_SC_layer_in region II and two_current leads at the corners._When the_magnetic domains of magnetic TI are aligned in_the_same direction, the_magnetic TI is in a QAH state with a_single chiral edge state propagating along_the sample boundary._During_the_flipping of the magnetic_domains at the coercive field, $\lambda$_decreases and the magnetic TI enters_the NI with a zero-plateau in Hall_conductance $\sigma_{xy}$ over a finite range_of magnetic field [@wang2014a; @fengy2015; @kou2015],_as shown_in Fig. \[fig3\]b. Either perpendicular or_in plane external_magnetic field_could induce such_plateau transition [@kou2015]. When the SC proximity_effect is sufficiently_strong, the superconducting region II experiences_the_BdG Chern number_variation_$\mathcal{N}=-2\rightarrow-1\rightarrow0\rightarrow1\rightarrow2$_as $\lambda$_decreases in the_hysteresis_loop (dashed_line_in Fig. \[fig3\]a). Therefore, the transport setup_Fig. \[fig1\]_is a QAH/NI-TSC/NSC-QAH/NI junction. As we will_discuss in details below,_the_edge transport features of_the junction uniquely convey the_topological properties of the SC in_region II.

The_QAH edge_state can be viewed as two CMEMs since a $\mathcal{C}=1$ QAH_state is topologically equivalent to a_$\mathcal{N}=2$ TSC. Therefore, in_the case_of_QAH$_{\mathcal{C}=1}$-TSC$_{\mathcal{N}=2}$-QAH$_{\mathcal{C}=1}$ junction (Fig. \[fig3\]j),_the_edge current_will be perfectly transmitted. By contrast, if_the junction_is QAH$_{\mathcal{C}=1}$-TSC$_{\mathcal{N}=1}$-QAH$_{\mathcal{C}=1}$ (Fig. \[fig3\]i), the chiral edge_state in the QAH_region_separates into two CMEMs at the_T