rm bce}$ exceeds a critical value $T_{\rm dup}$ at the stage of post-flash luminosity peak. The quantity $T_{\rm dup}$ is assumed as a free parameter.

In Figure \[fig\_mc3\] the left-hand side panels display the $M_{\rm c}^{\rm min}$ predictions for $\log(T_{\rm dup})= 6.2, 6.4, 6.5, 6.6, 6.7, 6.8$ and three values of the initial metallicity, $Z_{\rm i}=0.02, \,Z_{\rm i}=0.008, \,{\rm and}\, Z_{\rm i}=0.004$. The numerical method described in Sect. \[ssec\_tbdred\] has been applied for stellar masses ranging from $1\,M_{\odot}$ to $3\,M_{\odot}$ in steps of $0.05\,M_{\odot}$. In practice, once set the minimum temperature $T_{\rm dup}$, for each initial stellar mass and chemical composition, $M_{\rm c}^{\rm min}$ is the value of the core mass for which $T_{\rm bce}=T_{\rm dup}$ is satisfied. The solution is found iteratively with envelope integrations adopting the Brent root-finding algorithm [chapter IX of “Numerical Recipes”; @Press_etal88]. In each case $M_{\rm c}^{\rm min}$ is taken as the maximum between the value obtained by the envelope-integration method and the core mass at the first thermal pulse, $M_{\rm c,1}$. We do not show the results for $M> 3M_{\odot}$, since for the higher masses the temperature criterion is always satisfied since the onset of the TP-AGB, regardless of the value $T_{\rm dup}$. We see that all the curves share the same trend. Starting from lower masses towards the higher ones, $M_{\rm c}^{\rm min}$ slightly decreases, reaches a minimum and then steeply increases. It is interesting to note that the minimum in $M_{\rm c}^{\rm min}$ corresponds exactly to the critical maximum mass, $M_{\rm HeF}$, for a star to develop a degenerate He-core and experience the He-flash at the tip of the RGB. This reflects the same correspondence between $M_{\rm HeF}$ and the minimum of $M_{\rm c,1}$ (see Fig. \[fig\_mc1\]), already pointed out long ago
rm bce}$ exceeds a critical value $ T_{\rm dup}$ at the stage of post - flash luminosity peak. The measure $ T_{\rm dup}$ is assume as a free argument. 

 In Figure   \[fig\_mc3\ ] the left - handwriting side panel display the $ M_{\rm c}^{\rm min}$ predictions for $ \log(T_{\rm dup})= 6.2, 6.4, 6.5, 6.6, 6.7, 6.8 $ and three value of the initial metallicity, $ Z_{\rm i}=0.02, \,Z_{\rm i}=0.008, \,{\rm and}\, Z_{\rm i}=0.004$. The numerical method identify in Sect.   \[ssec\_tbdred\ ] has been applied for stellar batch ranging from $ 1\,M_{\odot}$ to $ 3\,M_{\odot}$ in steps of $ 0.05\,M_{\odot}$. In practice, once set the minimum temperature $ T_{\rm dup}$, for each initial stellar batch and chemical composition, $ M_{\rm c}^{\rm min}$ is the value of the core mass for which $ T_{\rm bce}=T_{\rm dup}$ is quenched. The solution is found iteratively with envelope integrations adopt the Brent root - find algorithm [ chapter IX of “ Numerical Recipes ”; @Press_etal88 ]. In each case $ M_{\rm c}^{\rm min}$ is taken as the maximum between the value obtained by the envelope - integration method acting and the core mass at the first thermal pulse, $ M_{\rm c,1}$. We do not show the results for $ M > 3M_{\odot}$, since for the high masses the temperature criterion is always satisfied since the onset of the TP - AGB, regardless of the value $ T_{\rm dup}$. We see that all the curves share the same trend. start from lower masses towards the high ones, $ M_{\rm c}^{\rm min}$ slightly decreases, reaches a minimum and then steeply increase. It is interesting to notice that the minimum in $ M_{\rm c}^{\rm min}$ corresponds exactly to the critical maximum bulk, $ M_{\rm HeF}$, for a star to develop a degenerate He - core and experience the He - flash at the tip of the RGB. This reflects the same correspondence between $ M_{\rm HeF}$ and the minimum of $ M_{\rm c,1}$ (go steady Fig.   \[fig\_mc1\ ]), already sharpen out long ago
rm hce}$ exceeds a critical vxlue $T_{\rm dup}$ at the stege of lost-flasf luminosity peak. The quantivy $T_{\em duk}$ is assumed as a ffee paramvter.

In Fiture \[hig\_mc3\] the left-hais side icnels fispney the $M_{\rm c}^{\rm kin}$ predicdions for $\log(T_{\sm dbp})= 6.2, 6.4, 6.5, 6.6, 6.7, 6.8$ and three values of the inieial meyaplicity, $Z_{\rm i}=0.02, \,E_{\rm i}=0.008, \,{\wm ahd}\, Z_{\rm i}=0.004$. The numerical method descdibed ii Sect. \[ssec\_tbdrec\] has been applied for steplar masses ranging frlm $1\,M_{\odot}$ to $3\,M_{\odjr}$ in steps ow $0.05\,M_{\odot}$. In practice, onde set the minimum temperature $G_{\rm dbp}$, for each ibitldl stellar nass wnd chemical composidion, $M_{\rk c}^{\rm min}$ is tme vanue of the core mass for which $T_{\rm bce}=T_{\rm qup}$ is sadiafied. The solutiob us foond ideraguveuy sivh snvelooe mntegrationa adopting rhe Brent root-findimg qlgorithm [chalter IV jf “Numerical Recipes”; @Press_etal88]. In each base $M_{\rm c}^{\rm min}$ is taken aw the maximum between the valuq obtained by the envelope-integration method and dhe ckfe nafr ah the first thermal pulse, $M_{\rm c,1}$. We do not shor tne results for $M> 3M_{\odot}$, sincr vot the higher mxsses cge temperature critegion is alwats satisfyed xince the onset of the TP-AGV, regardless if the value $T_{\rm dbp}$. We see thct all the vurves share the same txend. Sfarting frol lower mzrses towards the hinhes ones, $M_{\rm c}^{\rm min}$ slightlr decreasxs, recches a oinikum anq then stefply ltcreases. It is intfrestnng tm note thah the minimum in $M_{\rm c}^{\rm min}$ coccesponds exacjly to the cricical kaximum mass, $I_{\rm HeF}$, for a xtar to deveuop a degeherate Ie-core and evperience the Je-flash at tie tip of the RGB. This rdwlects the samr correspondence berween $M_{\rm HeF}$ and bhe mkhimum of $M_{\rm c,1}$ (wee Fig. \[fig\_mc1\]), alreacy ooigtvd pue long ago
rm bce}$ exceeds a critical value $T_{\rm the of post-flash peak. The quantity a parameter. In Figure the left-hand side display the $M_{\rm c}^{\rm min}$ predictions $\log(T_{\rm dup})= 6.2, 6.4, 6.5, 6.6, 6.7, 6.8$ and three values of the metallicity, $Z_{\rm i}=0.02, \,Z_{\rm i}=0.008, \,{\rm and}\, Z_{\rm i}=0.004$. The numerical method described Sect. has applied stellar masses ranging from $1\,M_{\odot}$ to $3\,M_{\odot}$ in steps of $0.05\,M_{\odot}$. In practice, once set the temperature $T_{\rm dup}$, for each initial stellar mass chemical composition, $M_{\rm c}^{\rm is the value of the mass which $T_{\rm dup}$ satisfied. solution is found with envelope integrations adopting the Brent root-finding algorithm [chapter IX of “Numerical Recipes”; @Press_etal88]. In each case c}^{\rm min}$ as the between value by the envelope-integration the core mass at the first c,1}$. We do not show the results for 3M_{\odot}$, since the higher masses the temperature criterion always satisfied since the onset of the TP-AGB, of the value $T_{\rm dup}$. We see that all the curves share the same trend. lower masses towards the ones, $M_{\rm c}^{\rm slightly reaches minimum then steeply It is interesting to note that the minimum in $M_{\rm c}^{\rm corresponds exactly to the critical maximum mass, $M_{\rm HeF}$, for to a degenerate He-core experience the He-flash at tip the RGB. This reflects correspondence $M_{\rm minimum $M_{\rm (see Fig. \[fig\_mc1\]), already out long ago
rm bce}$ exceeds a critical valuE $T_{\rm dup}$ at tHe staGe oF poSt-FlasH lumInosity peak. The QUantIty $T_{\rm dup}$ is assumed as a fRee paRaMEter.

iN FIgure \[Fig\_mc3\] thE LeFT-HanD sIdE paNeLS dIsplaY thE $M_{\rm c}^{\rm Min}$ predictIonS fOr $\log(T_{\rm dup})= 6.2, 6.4, 6.5, 6.6, 6.7, 6.8$ aND tHree values Of tHe initial metAllIcity, $Z_{\Rm I}=0.02, \,Z_{\rM I}=0.008, \,{\rm anD}\, Z_{\rM i}=0.004$. The NumeriCAl methOd describEd IN Sect. \[sSEc\_tbdreD\] HAs Been Applied for stellar MAsSEs ranging from $1\,M_{\Odot}$ to $3\,m_{\oDOt}$ IN StePs oF $0.05\,M_{\odot}$. In prAcTice, oNCe set thE MiNIMUm tEMperature $T_{\rm dUp}$, for each inITiaL stellAr MasS And cheMical CoMPosItion, $M_{\rm c}^{\rm Min}$ iS the value Of the cORe mass fOR which $T_{\Rm bce}=T_{\Rm dUp}$ iS satISfIeD. ThE sOLutIOn Is fOUnd IterativElY wIth enVeloPE INTegrAtiOns aDoptiNg the Brent rooT-fiNdinG AlgOrithM [chapTer Ix oF “NumeRical REcipeS”; @PRess_etal88]. In each cAse $M_{\Rm c}^{\rm min}$ iS taKeN as ThE maxiMUm betwEen The Value obTained bY The EnVELOpE-integration method AnD THe Core mass At the fIRsT tHErmal pulSe, $m_{\rm C,1}$. We dO NOt shoW the REsUlts for $M> 3m_{\odot}$, sINcE fOr the hiGhEr massEs The TemPeratURe crIterioN is alwayS satiSFied since the onSEt of the TP-AGB, rEGaRDLeSS of tHe vAlue $T_{\rm dup}$. WE see THat aLl thE CuRveS Share The saMe TReND. Starting from lower mAsSes towArds tHe higher ones, $M_{\Rm c}^{\rm min}$ slIGHTly decreAses, REaCHes a minimum and Then sTeeply incrEAses. It is InterEsting to Note that tHE Minimum iN $M_{\rM c}^{\rM miN}$ coRREsPonds exactly tO THe crItIcal maxImuM mass, $M_{\rM Hef}$, foR a sTar To Develop a dEgeneratE HE-cOrE aNd eXperiENce the He-FlAsh At The Tip of THe RGB. THis reFlecTs ThE SamE corresPOnDENce bEtWeEn $M_{\rM Hef}$ aNd the MiniMUm oF $M_{\rm c,1}$ (seE Fig. \[fig\_mc1\]), AlrEAdy pOiNtEd out loNg ago
rm bce}$ exceeds a critica l value $T _{\rm  du p}$  a t th e st age of post-fl a sh l uminosity peak. The qu antit y$ T_{\ r mdup}$  is ass u me d asafr eepa r am eter. 

I n Figur e \[fig\_m c3\ ]the left-han d  s ide panels  di splay the $M _{\ rm c}^ {\ rmm in}$pre dicti ons fo r  $\log (T_{\rm d up } )= 6.2 ,  6.4, 6 . 5 ,6.6,  6.7, 6.8$ and th r ee values of theinitia lm et a l lic ity , $Z_{\rmi} =0.02 ,  \,Z_{\ r mi } = 0.0 0 8, \,{\rm and }\, Z_{\rmi }=0 .004$.  T hen umeric al me th o d d escribed in  Sec t. \[ssec \_tbdr e d\] has been ap pliedfor  st ella r  m as ses  r a ngi n gfro m  $1 \,M_{\od ot }$  to $ 3\,M _ { \ o dot} $ i n st eps o f $0.05\,M_{\ odo t}$. Inpract ice,once  s et th e mini mum t em perature $T_{\r m du p}$, foreac hini ti al st e llar m ass  an d chemi cal com p osi ti o n ,  $ M_{\rm c}^{\rm min }$ i sthe valu e of t h eco r e mass f or  wh ich$ T _{\rm  bce } =T _{\rm du p}$ is sa ti sfied.Th e solu ti onisfound iter ativel y with e nvelo p e integrations adopting theB re n t  r o ot-f ind ing algorit hm [ c hapt er I X  o f “ N umeri cal R ec i pe s ”; @Press_etal88].In  eachcase$M_{\rm c}^{\ rm min}$ i s t aken asthem ax i mum between th e val ue obtaine d  by theenvel ope-inte gration m e t hod andthe  co remas s at  the first th e r malpu lse, $M _{\ rm c,1} $.Wedonot  s how the r esults f or  $ M>  3 M_{ \odot } $, since  f orth e h igher masses  thetemp er at u recriteri o ni s  alw ay ssati sfi ed  sinc e th e  on set ofthe TP-AG B,r egar dl es s of th e value $T_{\ rm  dup}$. We  s eethat a l l  the cur ves share the same tren d . Start ing  from  low er masses  to wardsthe higher  ones,  $M_{ \r m c } ^ {\rmm i n} $ s li ghtly decr e a ses , rea ch es a  minimu m and then steeply inc reases. It is  in tere s t in g t o  n o teth a t t h e  minimum in $M_ {\rm c}^{\ rm mi n}$ corres p ond sexactly  to the  crit i cal max imum mass , $M_{\rm  H eF}$ , for  a star to  develop  a degene r ate H e -c ore a ndexperi en cethe H e-flas h  at  thetip of  t he RGB . Thi sreflects  the same correspondenc e betw een $ M_{ \rm HeF}$  an d  th e minimum  of$M_{\rm c, 1}$  (s ee Fi g.\ [fig\ _mc1 \ ]) , a l ready  poi n ted out l o ng  ag o 
rm bce}$_exceeds a_critical value $T_{\rm dup}$_at the_stage_of post-flash_luminosity_peak. The quantity_$T_{\rm dup}$ is_assumed as a free_parameter.

In Figure \[fig\_mc3\] the_left-hand_side panels display the $M_{\rm c}^{\rm min}$ predictions for $\log(T_{\rm dup})= 6.2, 6.4, 6.5,_6.6,_6.7, 6.8$_and_three_values of the initial metallicity,_$Z_{\rm i}=0.02, \,Z_{\rm i}=0.008, \,{\rm_and}\, Z_{\rm_i}=0.004$. The numerical method described in Sect. \[ssec\_tbdred\] has_been_applied for stellar_masses ranging from $1\,M_{\odot}$ to $3\,M_{\odot}$ in steps of_$0.05\,M_{\odot}$. In practice, once set the_minimum temperature $T_{\rm_dup}$,_for_each initial stellar mass_and chemical composition, $M_{\rm c}^{\rm min}$_is the value of the core_mass for which $T_{\rm bce}=T_{\rm dup}$ is_satisfied. The solution is found iteratively_with envelope integrations adopting the_Brent root-finding_algorithm [chapter IX of “Numerical_Recipes”; @Press_etal88]. In_each case_$M_{\rm c}^{\rm min}$_is taken as the maximum between_the value obtained_by the envelope-integration method and the_core_mass at the_first_thermal_pulse, $M_{\rm_c,1}$. We do_not_show the_results_for $M> 3M_{\odot}$, since for the_higher_masses the temperature criterion is always satisfied_since the onset of_the_TP-AGB, regardless of the_value $T_{\rm dup}$. We see_that all the curves share the_same trend._Starting from_lower masses towards the higher ones, $M_{\rm c}^{\rm min}$ slightly decreases,_reaches a minimum and then steeply_increases. It is interesting_to note_that_the minimum in_$M_{\rm_c}^{\rm min}$_corresponds exactly to the critical maximum mass,_$M_{\rm HeF}$,_for a star to develop a_degenerate He-core and experience_the_He-flash at the tip of the_RGB. This reflects the same correspondence_between $M_{\rm HeF}$ and the_minimum_of_$M_{\rm c,1}$ (see Fig. \[fig\_mc1\]), already_pointed out long ago