)}$, (d) $\delta=0.01\cdot\alpha{\left({0}\right)}$, (e) $\delta=0.05\cdot\alpha{\left({0}\right)}$, (f) $\delta=0.1\cdot\alpha{\left({0}\right)}$. The experimental parameters are: $\alpha{\left({0}\right)}=6\cdot2\pi KHz$, $\gamma= 50\cdot2\pi M(Hz)^2$ with $\mu{\left({0}\right)}=-1$. The varying values of $|\delta|=|d\mu/dt|$ are related to the quality of the inertial approximation, for slow change in $\mu$ the inertial approximation is satisfied, Cf. panels (c) and (d). Varying $\mu$ rapidly leads to the breakdown of the inertial theorem, see panels (a),(b),(e) and (f).[]{data-label="fig:1"}](graph_b.pdf "fig:"){width="23.50000%"}![The normalized energy as a function of time for the experimental result (blue), inertial solution (red) and numerical solution (dashed-black) for different values of $\delta$; (a) $\delta=- \alpha{\left({0}\right)}$, (b) $\delta=-0.05\cdot\alpha{\left({0}\right)}$, (c) $\delta=-0.01\cdot\alpha{\left({0}\right)}$, (d) $\delta=0.01\cdot\alpha{\left({0}\right)}$, (e) $\delta=0.05\cdot\alpha{\left({0}\right)}$, (f) $\delta=0.1\cdot\alpha{\left({0}\right)}$. The experimental parameters are: $\alpha{\left({0}\right)}=6\cdot2\pi KHz$, $\gamma= 50\cdot2\pi M(Hz)^2$ with $\mu{\left({0}\right)}=-1$. The varying values of $|\delta|=|d\mu/dt|$ are related to the quality of the inertial approximation, for slow change in $\mu$ the inertial approximation is satisfied, Cf. panels (c) and (d). Varying $\mu$ rapidly leads to the breakdown of the inertial theorem, see panels (a),(b),(e) and (f).[]{data-label="fig:1"}](graph_c.pdf "fig:"){width="23.5
) } $, (d) $ \delta=0.01\cdot\alpha{\left({0}\right)}$, (e) $ \delta=0.05\cdot\alpha{\left({0}\right)}$, (f) $ \delta=0.1\cdot\alpha{\left({0}\right)}$. The experimental parameters are: $ \alpha{\left({0}\right)}=6\cdot2\pi KHz$, $ \gamma= 50\cdot2\pi M(Hz)^2 $ with $ \mu{\left({0}\right)}=-1$. The varying values of $ |\delta|=|d\mu / dt|$ are relate to the timbre of the inertial approximation, for slow variety in $ \mu$ the inertial approximation is quenched, Cf. panels (c) and (d). vary $ \mu$ quickly leads to the breakdown of the inertial theorem, see panels (a),(b),(e) and (f).[]{data - label="fig:1"}](graph_b.pdf " fig:"){width="23.50000%"}![The normalized department of energy as a function of time for the experimental result (blue), inertial solution (crimson) and numerical solution (dashed - black) for different values of $ \delta$; (a) $ \delta=- \alpha{\left({0}\right)}$, (b) $ \delta=-0.05\cdot\alpha{\left({0}\right)}$, (coke) $ \delta=-0.01\cdot\alpha{\left({0}\right)}$, (d) $ \delta=0.01\cdot\alpha{\left({0}\right)}$, (e) $ \delta=0.05\cdot\alpha{\left({0}\right)}$, (f) $ \delta=0.1\cdot\alpha{\left({0}\right)}$. The experimental parameters are: $ \alpha{\left({0}\right)}=6\cdot2\pi KHz$, $ \gamma= 50\cdot2\pi M(Hz)^2 $ with $ \mu{\left({0}\right)}=-1$. The varying value of $ |\delta|=|d\mu / dt|$ are related to the quality of the inertial approximation, for slow variety in $ \mu$ the inertial approximation is quenched, Cf. panels (c) and (d). Varying $ \mu$ rapidly leave to the breakdown of the inertial theorem, see panels (a),(b),(e) and (f).[]{data - label="fig:1"}](graph_c.pdf " fig:"){width="23.5
)}$, (d) $\felta=0.01\cdot\alpha{\left({0}\right)}$, (t) $\delta=0.05\cdot\alpha{\lgfr({0}\right)}$, (f) $\delfa=0.1\cdot\aloha{\left({0}\right)}$. The experimentap paramtners are: $\alpha{\left({0}\rigft)}=6\cdot2\pi NHz$, $\gammq= 50\cdir2\pi M(Hz)^2$ wivg $\mu{\lefb({0}\xight)}=-1$. Bhe vcrbing values of $|\celta|=|d\mu/dt|$ are related tm ghz quality of the inertial approximatyon, for spow change in $\iu$ tnq insgtlal approximation is satisfied, Cr. panelv (c) and (d). Varuing $\mu$ rapidly leads to tje bgeakdown of the infrtial theotsm, fwe panels (a),(b),(d) and (f).[]{data-label="fig:1"}](grakh_b.pdf "fig:"){width="23.50000%"}![The normalized endrgy cs a functiin of jime for the expegimental result (blue), hnertiak solution (red) anv nunerical solution (dashxd-black) for differenj values ox $\belta$; (a) $\delta=- \alpha{\ledt({0}\eight)}$, (b) $\dalta=-0.05\zeot\xlpga{\kert({0}\righh)}$, (c) $\delta=-0.01\cdot\zlpha{\left({0}\ritht)}$, (d) $\delta=0.01\cdot\alphs{\lqdt({0}\right)}$, (e) $\delfa=0.05\cdot\wl[ha{\left({0}\right)}$, (f) $\delta=0.1\cdot\alpha{\left({0}\right)}$. Uhe esperimental parameters qre: $\alpha{\left({0}\right)}=6\cdoj2\pi KHz$, $\gaima= 50\cdot2\pi M(Hz)^2$ with $\mu{\left({0}\right)}=-1$. The varying valuev of $|\veuta|=|b\nu/dt|$ xee related to the quality of the inertial approvjmstpon, for slow channe in $\mu$ the inertoap skproximation ir satisfisd, Cf. panels (c) and (d). Varyyng $\my$ rapidly leacs to the breakdown of the unertial thejeem, see panels (a),(b),(e) and (f).[]{data-lcbel="fib:1"}](grapn_c.pdf "fig:"){width="23.5
)}$, (d) $\delta=0.01\cdot\alpha{\left({0}\right)}$, (e) $\delta=0.05\cdot\alpha{\left({0}\right)}$, (f) $\delta=0.1\cdot\alpha{\left({0}\right)}$. parameters $\alpha{\left({0}\right)}=6\cdot2\pi KHz$, 50\cdot2\pi M(Hz)^2$ with $|\delta|=|d\mu/dt|$ related to the of the inertial for slow change in $\mu$ the approximation is satisfied, Cf. panels (c) and (d). Varying $\mu$ rapidly leads to breakdown of the inertial theorem, see panels (a),(b),(e) and (f).[]{data-label="fig:1"}](graph_b.pdf "fig:"){width="23.50000%"}![The normalized energy a of for experimental result (blue), inertial solution (red) and numerical solution (dashed-black) for different values of $\delta$; (a) \alpha{\left({0}\right)}$, (b) $\delta=-0.05\cdot\alpha{\left({0}\right)}$, (c) $\delta=-0.01\cdot\alpha{\left({0}\right)}$, (d) $\delta=0.01\cdot\alpha{\left({0}\right)}$, (e) (f) $\delta=0.1\cdot\alpha{\left({0}\right)}$. The experimental are: $\alpha{\left({0}\right)}=6\cdot2\pi KHz$, $\gamma= 50\cdot2\pi with The varying of are to the quality the inertial approximation, for slow change in $\mu$ the inertial approximation is satisfied, Cf. panels (c) and Varying $\mu$ to the of inertial see panels (a),(b),(e) "fig:"){width="23.5
)}$, (d) $\delta=0.01\cdot\alpha{\left({0}\right)}$, (e) $\Delta=0.05\cdot\aLpha{\lEft({0}\RigHt)}$, (F) $\delTa=0.1\cdOt\alpha{\left({0}\rigHT)}$. The Experimental parameters Are: $\alPhA{\Left({0}\RIgHt)}=6\cdoT2\pi KHz$, $\gAMmA= 50\CDot2\Pi m(HZ)^2$ wiTh $\MU{\lEft({0}\riGht)}=-1$. the varyIng values oF $|\deLtA|=|d\mu/dt|$ are relATeD to the qualIty Of the inertiaL apProximAtIon, FOr sloW chAnge iN $\mu$ the INertiaL approximAtIOn is saTIsfied, CF. PAnEls (c) And (d). Varying $\mu$ rapiDLy LEads to the breakDown of ThE InERTiaL thEorem, see paNeLs (a),(b),(e) ANd (f).[]{data-LAbEL="FIg:1"}](gRAph_b.pdf "fig:"){widTh="23.50000%"}![The normalIZed Energy As A fuNCtion oF time FoR The ExperimentaL resUlt (blue), inErtial SOlution (REd) and nuMericaL soLutIon (dAShEd-BlaCk) FOr dIFfEreNT vaLues of $\deLtA$; (a) $\Delta=- \AlphA{\LEFT({0}\rigHt)}$, (b) $\DeltA=-0.05\cdot\Alpha{\left({0}\righT)}$, (c) $\dElta=-0.01\CDot\Alpha{\Left({0}\rIght)}$, (D) $\dElta=0.01\cDot\alpHa{\lefT({0}\rIght)}$, (e) $\delta=0.05\cdot\aLpha{\Left({0}\right)}$, (F) $\deLtA=0.1\cdOt\Alpha{\LEft({0}\rigHt)}$. THe eXperimeNtal parAMetErS ARE: $\aLpha{\left({0}\right)}=6\cdot2\pI KhZ$, $\GaMma= 50\cdot2\pI M(Hz)^2$ wiTH $\mU{\lEFt({0}\right)}=-1$. THe VarYing VALues oF $|\delTA|=|d\Mu/dt|$ are rElated TO tHe Quality Of The ineRtIal AppRoximATion, For sloW change iN $\mu$ thE Inertial approxIMation is satisFIeD, cF. pANels (C) anD (d). Varying $\mu$ RapiDLy leAds tO ThE brEAkdowN of thE iNErTIal theorem, see panels (A),(b),(E) and (f).[]{dAta-laBel="fig:1"}](graph_c.pDf "fig:"){width="23.5
)}$, (d) $\delta=0.01\cdot \alpha{\le ft({0 }\r igh t) }$,(e)$\delta=0.05\c d ot\a lpha{\left({0}\right)} $, (f )$ \del t a= 0.1\c dot\alp h a{ \ l eft ({ 0} \ri gh t )} $. Th e e xperime ntal param ete rs  are: $\alph a {\ left({0}\r igh t)}=6\cdot2\ piKHz$,$\ gam m a= 50 \cd ot2\p i M(Hz ) ^2$ wi th $\mu{\ le f t({0}\ r ight)}= - 1 $.  The  varying values o f  $ | \delta|=|d\mu/ dt|$ a re re l a ted  to  the quali ty  of t h e inert i al a p pro x imation, forslow change in$\mu$th e i n ertial  appr ox i mat ion is sati sfie d, Cf. pa nels ( c ) and ( d ). Vary ing $\ mu$  ra pidl y  l ea dsto the br eak d own  of thein er tialtheo r e m ,  see  pa nels  (a), (b),(e) and ( f). []{d a ta- label ="fig :1"} ]( graph _b.pdf  "fig :" ){width="23.500 00%" }![The no rma li zed  e nergy as a f unc tio n of ti me fort heex p e r im ental result (blue ), i ne rtial so lution (r ed )  and num er ica l so l u tion(das h ed -black)for di f fe re nt valu es  of $\ de lta $;(a) $ \ delt a=- \a lpha{\le ft({0 } \right)}$, (b) $\delta=-0.05 \ cd o t \a l pha{ \le ft({0}\righ t)}$ ,  (c)  $\d e lt a=- 0 .01\c dot\a lp h a{ \ left({0}\right)}$,(d ) $\de lta=0 .01\cdot\alph a{\left({0 } \ r ight)}$,  (e) $\ d elta=0.05\cdot \alph a{\left({0 } \right)} $, (f ) $\delt a=0.1\cdo t \ alpha{\l eft ({0 }\r igh t ) }$ . The experim e n talpa rameter s a re: $\a lph a{\ lef t({ 0} \right)}= 6\cdot2\ pi  K Hz $,  $\ gamma =  50\cdot 2\ piM( Hz) ^2$ w i th $\m u{\le ft({ 0} \r i ght )}=-1$. Th e vary in gvalu esof  $|\d elta | =|d \mu/dt| $ are rel ate d  toth equality  of the inert ia l approxim at ion , fors l ow chang e in $\mu$ the inertial approxi mat ion i s sa tisfied,Cf.  panel s ( c ) and(d). V aryin g$\m u $  rapi d l ylea ds  to the br e a kdo wn of  t he i nertial  theorem, see pane l s ( a),(b),(e) an d ( f).[ ] { da ta- l ab e l=" fi g :1" } ] (graph_c.pdf "f ig:"){widt h= " 23 .5
)}$, (d)_$\delta=0.01\cdot\alpha{\left({0}\right)}$, (e)_$\delta=0.05\cdot\alpha{\left({0}\right)}$, (f) $\delta=0.1\cdot\alpha{\left({0}\right)}$. The_experimental parameters_are:_$\alpha{\left({0}\right)}=6\cdot2\pi KHz$,_$\gamma=_50\cdot2\pi M(Hz)^2$ with_$\mu{\left({0}\right)}=-1$. The varying_values of $|\delta|=|d\mu/dt|$ are_related to the_quality_of the inertial approximation, for slow change in $\mu$ the inertial approximation is satisfied,_Cf._panels (c)_and_(d)._Varying $\mu$ rapidly leads to_the breakdown of the inertial_theorem, see_panels (a),(b),(e) and (f).[]{data-label="fig:1"}](graph_b.pdf "fig:"){width="23.50000%"}![The normalized energy as_a_function of time_for the experimental result (blue), inertial solution (red) and_numerical solution (dashed-black) for different values_of $\delta$; (a)_$\delta=-_\alpha{\left({0}\right)}$,_(b) $\delta=-0.05\cdot\alpha{\left({0}\right)}$, (c) $\delta=-0.01\cdot\alpha{\left({0}\right)}$,_(d) $\delta=0.01\cdot\alpha{\left({0}\right)}$, (e) $\delta=0.05\cdot\alpha{\left({0}\right)}$, (f) $\delta=0.1\cdot\alpha{\left({0}\right)}$._The experimental parameters are: $\alpha{\left({0}\right)}=6\cdot2\pi KHz$,_$\gamma= 50\cdot2\pi M(Hz)^2$ with $\mu{\left({0}\right)}=-1$. The varying_values of $|\delta|=|d\mu/dt|$ are related to_the quality of the inertial_approximation, for_slow change in $\mu$ the_inertial approximation is_satisfied, Cf._panels (c) and_(d). Varying $\mu$ rapidly leads to_the breakdown of_the inertial theorem, see panels (a),(b),(e)_and_(f).[]{data-label="fig:1"}](graph_c.pdf "fig:"){width="23.5