,258}$Fm, are well-known examples where model calculations deviate from experimental data [@Flynn+72; @Hoffman+89; @Gonnenwein+99]. The origin of this transition has long been debated [@Warda+02; @Bonneau+06]. Improvements to model calculations can be made by increasing the smoothing range of the Strutinsky shell-correction procedure [@Albertsson+2019a; @Albertsson+2019b] or by applying Langevin dynamics [@Usang+19].

Global mass yield trends
------------------------

Understanding the trends of fission yields across the chart of nuclides is of particular interest to the astrophysical $r$-process of nucleosynthesis [@Cote+18; @Giuliani+18]. To this end, we introduce in what follows three key metrics to classify a given mass yield, $Y(A)$.

[**1: Number of peaks, $N_{\rm p}$.**]{}The fission fragment mass number distribution $Y(A)$ is always symmetric around the midpoint, $\mbox{$1\over2$}A_0$, due to nucleon number conservation $A_{\rm L}+A_{\rm H}=A_0$, but it may exhibit any number of peaks. Purely symmetric fission leads to a single centrally located peak, while single-mode asymmetric fission leads to two peaks located at opposite sides of the midpoint. Bimodal fission also occurs. For example, $^{226}$Th(n,f) exhibits both symmetric and asymmetric components (with comparable peak heights), $^{235}$U(n,f) has two nearly coinciding asymmetric components, in addition to an increasingly prominent symmetric component as the energy is increased, and some nuclei are predicted to have two widely different asymmetric components. In order to assign the value of the peak index $N_{\rm p}$, we proceed as follows. (1) We first spline interpolate the $Y(A)$ curve, creating $Y_\textrm{s}(A)$, to smooth out any minor bumps that may exist which can be misinterpreted as a peak. (2) Next, we count the maxima by computing the first derivative, $\dot{Y}_\textrm{s}(A)=0$ and second derivative $\ddot{Y}_\textrm{s}(A)<0$. (3) Since large features are typically spread out in $A$, we prevent the algorithm from finding major peaks within 10 mass units of another
, 258}$Fm, are well - known examples where model calculations deviate from experimental datum [ @Flynn+72; @Hoffman+89; @Gonnenwein+99 ]. The beginning of this transition has long been debated [ @Warda+02; @Bonneau+06 ]. improvement to mannequin calculations can be made by increase the polish range of the Strutinsky shell - correction procedure [ @Albertsson+2019a; @Albertsson+2019b ] or by apply Langevin dynamics [ @Usang+19 ]. 

 Global mass yield trends 
 ------------------------ 

 Understanding the tendency of fission yields across the chart of nuclides is of particular interest to the astrophysical $ r$-process of nucleosynthesis [ @Cote+18; @Giuliani+18 ]. To this conclusion, we introduce in what follows three key metrics to relegate a given multitude yield, $ Y(A)$. 

 [ * * 1: Number of peaks, $ N_{\rm p}$.**]{}The fission shard mass number distribution $ Y(A)$ is always symmetric around the midpoint, $ \mbox{$1\over2$}A_0 $, due to nucleon number conservation $ A_{\rm L}+A_{\rm H}=A_0 $, but it may exhibit any number of peaks. Purely symmetric fission leads to a single centrally located peak, while single - mode asymmetrical fission contribute to two peaks settle at diametric side of the midpoint. Bimodal fission also occur. For example, $ ^{226}$Th(n, f) exhibits both symmetric and asymmetric component (with comparable peak heights), $ ^{235}$U(n, f) has two nearly coinciding asymmetric part, in addition to an increasingly prominent symmetric component as the department of energy is increased, and some nucleus are predict to have two widely different asymmetric component. In order to assign the value of the peak exponent $ N_{\rm p}$, we proceed as postdate. (1) We first spline interpolate the $ Y(A)$ curve, create $ Y_\textrm{s}(A)$, to smooth out any minor bulge that may exist which can be misinterpreted as a peak. (2) Next, we consider the maxima by calculate the first derivative, $ \dot{Y}_\textrm{s}(A)=0 $ and second derivative $ \ddot{Y}_\textrm{s}(A)<0$. (3) Since large feature are typically spread out in $ A$, we prevent the algorithm from finding major peak within 10 mass unit of measurement of another
,258}$Fm, wre well-known examples wmere model calculations deviafe from dxperimental data [@Flynn+72; @Hofflab+89; @Gonbenwein+99]. The origin of ghis trandition hqs libg been deuzted [@Wavba+02; @Bohkeau+06]. Nm'rovements to mpdel calcunations can be mxdz by increasing the smoothing range jf the Xtgutinsky shell-sorrtctyon lgogedure [@Albertsson+2019a; @Albertsson+2019b] od by apklying Langevin dymamics [@Usang+19].

Global mass yifld hrends
------------------------

Understandinh the trendw of dission yielas across uhz chart of huclides is of particular interdst tp the astripyyslwal $r$-procesw of gucleosynthesis [@Cote+18; @Giuliami+18]. To this end, we inrroduce in what folloxs three key metrics to classhfv a given mass yield, $T(A)$.

[**1: Numbgr of peayw, $N_{\fm k}$.**]{}Thx fjssion fregment mass number disrribution $Y(A)$ is alwsyf symmetric arkund tre midpoint, $\mbox{$1\over2$}A_0$, due to nucleon numbtr cohservation $A_{\rm L}+A_{\rm H}=A_0$, vut it may exhibit ani number os peaks. Purely symmetric fission leads to a singla cenvrxllv locagwd peak, while single-mode asymmetric fission leaqa uo nwo peaks located at oppositr dicgs of the midpuint. Bnjosal fission also ofcurs. Fjr exqmple, $^{226}$Th(n,s) exnibits both symmetric and awymmetric coiponents (with compaxable peak hzights), $^{235}$U(n,f) nas two nearly coincidiug asyjmetric comoonents, ih addition to an kncgeashngly prominent symmetric somponent as che enerey ix incrqased, and dome kgclei are predictef to kave dwo widely different asymmetric components. In order to ssvigt the vajue on the peak indev $N_{\rm p}$, we proeeed as yollowr. (1) We firsn spline mnterpolate ehe $Y(A)$ curve, wteating $Y_\textcm{s}(A)$, to siooty our any mkvor bumps that may exisn chich can be misinterpreted as z peak. (2) Next, we coobt the maxima ny zom[uninj the xirst derivadive, $\dog{U}_\textfm{s}(A)=0$ and segona detivative $\ddot{Y}_\textrm{v}(A)<0$. (3) Aince large featurrs are typucally s[read out in $S$, we prevent the apgorivhm frum fimdigg major peaks within 10 mass unjts of anlthcr
,258}$Fm, are well-known examples where model calculations experimental [@Flynn+72; @Hoffman+89; The origin of debated @Bonneau+06]. Improvements to calculations can be by increasing the smoothing range of Strutinsky shell-correction procedure [@Albertsson+2019a; @Albertsson+2019b] or by applying Langevin dynamics [@Usang+19]. Global mass trends ------------------------ Understanding the trends of fission yields across the chart of nuclides of interest the $r$-process of nucleosynthesis [@Cote+18; @Giuliani+18]. To this end, we introduce in what follows three key metrics classify a given mass yield, $Y(A)$. [**1: Number peaks, $N_{\rm p}$.**]{}The fission mass number distribution $Y(A)$ is symmetric the midpoint, due nucleon conservation $A_{\rm L}+A_{\rm but it may exhibit any number of peaks. Purely symmetric fission leads to a single centrally located while single-mode leads to peaks at sides of the fission also occurs. For example, $^{226}$Th(n,f) and asymmetric components (with comparable peak heights), $^{235}$U(n,f) two nearly asymmetric components, in addition to an prominent symmetric component as the energy is increased, some nuclei are predicted to have two widely different asymmetric components. In order to assign of the peak index p}$, we proceed follows. We spline the $Y(A)$ creating $Y_\textrm{s}(A)$, to smooth out any minor bumps that may exist can be misinterpreted as a peak. (2) Next, we count by the first derivative, and second derivative $\ddot{Y}_\textrm{s}(A)<0$. Since features are typically spread $A$, prevent finding peaks 10 mass units of
,258}$Fm, are well-known examples wheRe model calCulatIonS deViAte fRom eXperimental datA [@flynN+72; @Hoffman+89; @Gonnenwein+99]. The oRigin Of THis tRAnSitioN has lonG BeEN DebAtEd [@warDa+02; @bOnNeau+06]. IMprOvementS to model caLcuLaTions can be maDE bY increasinG thE smoothing raNge Of the STrUtiNSky shEll-CorreCtion pROcedurE [@AlbertssOn+2019A; @albertSSon+2019b] or bY APpLyinG Langevin dynamics [@uSaNG+19].

Global mass yieLd trenDs
------------------------

uNdERStaNdiNg the trendS oF fissIOn yieldS AcROSS thE Chart of nuclidEs is of partiCUlaR interEsT to THe astrOphysIcAL $r$-pRocess of nucLeosYnthesis [@COte+18; @GiuLIani+18]. To tHIs end, we IntrodUce In wHat fOLlOwS thReE Key MEtRicS To cLassify a GiVeN mass YielD, $y(a)$.

[**1: nUmbeR of PeakS, $N_{\rm p}$.**]{}the fission fraGmeNt maSS nuMber dIstriButiOn $y(A)$ is aLways sYmmetRiC around the midpoInt, $\mBox{$1\over2$}A_0$, dUe tO nUclEoN numbER conseRvaTioN $A_{\rm L}+A_{\rM H}=A_0$, but iT May ExHIBIt Any number of peaks. PuReLY SyMmetric fIssion LEaDs TO a single CeNtrAlly LOCated Peak, WHiLe single-Mode asYMmEtRic fissIoN leads To Two PeaKs locATed aT opposIte sides Of the MIdpoint. Bimodal FIssion also occURs. fOR eXAmplE, $^{226}$Th(N,f) exhibits bOth sYMmetRic aND aSymMEtric CompoNeNTs (WIth comparable peak heIgHts), $^{235}$U(n,f) Has twO nearly coinciDing asymmeTRIC componeNts, iN AdDItion to an increAsingLy prominenT SymmetriC compOnent as tHe energy iS INcreased, And SomE nuCleI ARe Predicted to haVE Two wIdEly diffEreNt asymmEtrIc cOmpOneNtS. In order tO assign tHe VaLuE oF thE peak INdex $N_{\rm p}$, We ProCeEd aS follOWs. (1) We fiRst spLine InTeRPolAte the $Y(a)$ CuRVE, creAtInG $Y_\teXtrM{s}(a)$, to smOoth OUt aNy minor Bumps that May EXist WhIcH can be mIsinterpreted As A peak. (2) Next, wE cOunT the maXIMa by compUting the first derivative, $\DOt{Y}_\textRm{s}(a)=0$ and sEconD derivatiVe $\dDot{Y}_\teXtrM{S}(A)<0$. (3) SincE large FeatuReS arE TYpicaLLY sPreAd Out in $A$, we prEVEnt The alGoRithM from fiNding major peaks witHIn 10 mAss units of anoTheR
,258}$Fm, are well-known e xamples wh ere m ode l c al cula tion s deviate from expe rimental data [@Flynn+ 72; @ Ho f fman + 89 ; @Go nnenwei n +9 9 ] . T he  o rig in of  this  tr ansitio n has long  be en  debated [@W a rd a+02; @Bon nea u+06]. Impro vem ents t omod e l cal cul ation s canb e made  by incre as i ng the smoothi n g  r ange  of the Strutinsk y  s h ell-correction  proce du r e[ @ Alb ert sson+2019a ;@Albe r tsson+2 0 19 b ] orb y applying La ngevin dyna m ics  [@Usa ng +19 ] .

Glo bal m as s  yi eld trends---- --------- ------ - ----

U n derstan ding t hetre ndso ffi ssi on yie l ds  ac r oss  the cha rt  o f nuc lide s i s  ofpar ticu lar i nterest to th e a stro p hys ical$r$-p roce ss  of n ucleos ynthe si s [@Cote+18; @G iuli ani+18].Toth isen d, we introd uce  in  what f ollowst hre ek e y  m etrics to classify  a g iv en massyield, $Y (A ) $.

[**1 :Num bero f  peak s, $ N _{ \rm p}$. **]{}T h efi ssion f ra gmentma ssnum ber d i stri bution  $Y(A)$is al w ays symmetrica round the mid p oi n t ,$ \mbo x{$ 1\over2$}A_ 0$,d ue t o nu c le onn umber  cons er v at i on $A_{\rm L}+A_{\r mH}=A_0 $, bu t it may exhi bit any nu m b e r of pea ks.P ur e ly symmetric f issio n leads to a single  cent rally lo cated pea k ,  while s ing le- mod e a s y mm etric fission l eads  t o two p eak s locat edatopp osi te  sides of  the mid po in t.  B imo dal f i ssion al so  oc cu rs.  Fore xample , $^{ 226} $T h( n ,f)  exhibi t sb o th s ym me tric  an dasymm etri c  co mponent s (with c omp a rabl epe ak heig hts), $^{235} $U (n,f) hastw o n earlyc o inciding  asymmetric components, in addi tio n toan i ncreasing lypromin ent symmet ric co mpone nt  as t he en e r gy  is  i ncreased,a n d s ome n uc leiare pre dicted to have two wid ely different  as ymme t r ic  co m po n ent s. Ino r der to assign t he value o ft he  peak inde x  $N _{ \rm p}$ , we pr oceed as foll ows. (1)We firstsp line i nte rpolate th e $Y(A)$  curve, c r eatin g  $ Y_\te xtr m{s}(A )$ , t o smo oth ou t  an y min or bum ps  thatmay e xi st which  can be misinterpretedas a p eak.(2)  Next, we  co u ntthe maxim a by  computing  th e f irstder i vativ e, $ \ do t{Y } _\tex trm{ s }(A)=0$ a n dsec o n dderivative$ \ d dot {Y}_\ tex t rm{s}( A)<0 $. (3) Since larg e  features aretypi c a lly  sp r eadou t in $A$, we p rev en t the algo ri thm from fi nding ma jo r  peak s with in 10mass un i t so f anot her
,258}$Fm, are_well-known examples_where model calculations deviate_from experimental_data_[@Flynn+72; @Hoffman+89;_@Gonnenwein+99]._The origin of_this transition has_long been debated [@Warda+02;_@Bonneau+06]. Improvements to_model_calculations can be made by increasing the smoothing range of the Strutinsky shell-correction procedure_[@Albertsson+2019a;_@Albertsson+2019b] or_by_applying_Langevin dynamics [@Usang+19].

Global mass yield_trends
------------------------

Understanding the trends of fission_yields across_the chart of nuclides is of particular interest_to_the astrophysical $r$-process_of nucleosynthesis [@Cote+18; @Giuliani+18]. To this end, we introduce_in what follows three key metrics_to classify a_given_mass_yield, $Y(A)$.

[**1: Number of_peaks, $N_{\rm p}$.**]{}The fission fragment mass_number distribution $Y(A)$ is always symmetric_around the midpoint, $\mbox{$1\over2$}A_0$, due to nucleon_number conservation $A_{\rm L}+A_{\rm H}=A_0$, but_it may exhibit any number_of peaks._Purely symmetric fission leads to_a single centrally_located peak,_while single-mode asymmetric_fission leads to two peaks located_at opposite sides_of the midpoint. Bimodal fission also_occurs._For example, $^{226}$Th(n,f)_exhibits_both_symmetric and_asymmetric components (with_comparable_peak heights),_$^{235}$U(n,f)_has two nearly coinciding asymmetric components,_in_addition to an increasingly prominent symmetric component_as the energy is_increased,_and some nuclei are_predicted to have two widely_different asymmetric components. In order to_assign the_value of_the peak index $N_{\rm p}$, we proceed as follows. (1) We_first spline interpolate the $Y(A)$ curve,_creating $Y_\textrm{s}(A)$, to smooth_out any_minor_bumps that may_exist_which can_be misinterpreted as a peak. (2) Next,_we count_the maxima by computing the first_derivative, $\dot{Y}_\textrm{s}(A)=0$ and second_derivative_$\ddot{Y}_\textrm{s}(A)<0$. (3) Since large features are_typically spread out in $A$, we_prevent the algorithm from finding_major_peaks_within 10 mass units of_another