 y^2}-\frac{q}{y}\ 
\frac{\partial}{\partial y}\nonumber \end{aligned}$$ where $(p,q)$ are $c$-numbers.

It is assumed that the Hamiltonian (2) is a constraint for a classical Hamiltonain with the mass term present for the scalar field $\phi$. In other words, the canonical quantization needs the annihilation of the wave function $\psi$ by the corresponding quantum operator $$\hat{H}\psi =0$$ that results in the Wheeler-De Witt equation. Using eq. (2-5) we get $$\frac{\Lambda}{2R^2}\left(\frac{\partial^2\psi}{\partial \Lambda^2}+
\frac{p}{\Lambda}\ \frac{\partial \psi}{\partial \Lambda}\right)+
\frac{1}{2R^2\Lambda}\left(\frac{\partial^2\Lambda}{\partial \phi^2}+
\frac{q}{\phi}\frac{\partial \psi}{\partial \phi}\right)-
\frac{1}{R}\ \frac{\partial^2\psi}{\partial R\partial \Lambda}\equiv
V \psi$$ where $\psi$ is a functional of $\Lambda$, $\phi$ and $R$ functions, and $V$ is a potential term written as $$V=\frac{R}{\Lambda}\ R''-\frac{R}{\Lambda^2}\ R'\Lambda '+\frac{1}{2\Lambda}\
R{'}^2-\frac{1}{2}\ \Lambda +\frac{1}{2}\ \frac{R^2}{\Lambda}\ \phi{'}^2 +
\frac{1}{2}\ m^2R^2\Lambda \phi^2$$ The prime means derivative with respect to the coordinate $\underline{r}$. Observe that in equation (6) we don’t have any derivative with respect to time. This means that the equation (6) could be describing a spherically symmetric gravitational collapse but without any explicit time dependence for functional $\psi$. The concept of “time” in this case may appear only after quantization in accordance with [@tres].

This suggests that eq. (6) is like the usual Schrödinger equation of quantum mechanics applied to gravitational collapse but with a difference depending on the operator ordering \[1-5\].

The usual Schrödinger equation is written as $$H\psi =i\frac{\partial \psi}{\partial t}$$ where
y^2}-\frac{q}{y}\ 
 \frac{\partial}{\partial y}\nonumber \end{aligned}$$ where $ (p, q)$ are $ c$-numbers. 

 It is assumed that the Hamiltonian (2) is a constraint for a classical Hamiltonain with the aggregate condition present for the scalar field $ \phi$. In other actor's line, the canonic quantization needs the annihilation of the wave function $ \psi$ by the represent quantum hustler $ $ \hat{H}\psi = 0$$ that results in the Wheeler - De Witt equation. Using eq. (2 - 5) we get $ $ \frac{\Lambda}{2R^2}\left(\frac{\partial^2\psi}{\partial \Lambda^2}+ 
 \frac{p}{\Lambda}\ \frac{\partial \psi}{\partial \Lambda}\right)+ 
 \frac{1}{2R^2\Lambda}\left(\frac{\partial^2\Lambda}{\partial \phi^2}+ 
 \frac{q}{\phi}\frac{\partial \psi}{\partial \phi}\right)- 
 \frac{1}{R}\ \frac{\partial^2\psi}{\partial R\partial \Lambda}\equiv 
 V \psi$$ where $ \psi$ is a functional of $ \Lambda$, $ \phi$ and $ R$ functions, and $ V$ is a likely term written as $ $ V=\frac{R}{\Lambda}\ R''-\frac{R}{\Lambda^2}\ R'\Lambda' + \frac{1}{2\Lambda}\ 
 R{'}^2-\frac{1}{2}\ \Lambda + \frac{1}{2}\ \frac{R^2}{\Lambda}\ \phi{'}^2 + 
 \frac{1}{2}\ m^2R^2\Lambda \phi^2$$ The prime means derivative with regard to the coordinate $ \underline{r}$. Observe that in equation (6) we do n’t get any derivative with respect to clock time. This means that the equation (6) could be describing a spherically symmetrical gravitational collapse but without any explicit clock time dependence for running $ \psi$. The concept of “ time ” in this character may appear only after quantization in accordance with [ @tres ]. 

 This hint that eq. (6) is like the usual Schrödinger equation of quantum mechanics applied to gravitational collapse but with a remainder depending on the operator ordering \[1 - 5\ ]. 

 The usual Schrödinger equation is written as $ $ H\psi = i\frac{\partial \psi}{\partial t}$$ where
 y^2}-\fgac{q}{y}\ 
\frac{\partial}{\partial y}\nonumber \end{aligned}$$ xhere $(p,s)$ are $c$-njmbers.

It is assumed that the Hqmiltinian (2) is a constraint for a clwssical Yamioronain witi the mass terj prevxnt for the scakar field $\[hi$. In other wmras, the canonical quantization needs tre anninipation of the rave suncfpok $\psi$ by the corresponding quanthm operetor $$\hat{H}\psi =0$$ tnat results in the Wheeler-Fe Wltt equation. Using eq. (2-5) we get $$\fras{\Oambda}{2R^2}\left(\ffac{\partial^2\ksn}{\partial \Lajbda^2}+
\frac{p}{\Lambda}\ \frac{\partial \psi}{\oarticl \Lambda}\rithr)+
\frww{1}{2R^2\Lambda}\lefv(\frac{\pwrtial^2\Lambda}{\isrtial \phi^2}+
\frav{q}{\phi}\frac{\partisl \'si}{\pqrtial \phi}\right)-
\frac{1}{R}\ \hrac{\partial^2\psi}{\partiaj R\partian \Mambda}\equiv
V \psi$$ qhwre $\pvi$ iv a wyncgiohak kf $\Lamhda$, $\phi$ and $R$ functions, qnd $V$ is a potentiak evtm written aa $$V=\fras{R}{\Jambda}\ R''-\frac{R}{\Lambda^2}\ R'\Lambda '+\frac{1}{2\Lambda}\
R{'}^2-\xrad{1}{2}\ \Lambda +\frac{1}{2}\ \frac{R^2}{\Lambea}\ \phi{'}^2 +
\frac{1}{2}\ m^2R^2\Lambda \khi^2$$ The pryme means derivative with respect to the coordinade $\unvefliuc{v}$. Obrwrge that in equation (6) we don’t have any derivatybe wpth respect to tiie. This meams tnwt the equatiun (6) cobmd be describing a sohericajly stmmetric dravotational collapse but withiut any explpcit time dependence flr functioncl $\psi$. The voncept of “time” in this cass may appeag only affdr quantization kn scwordance with [@tres].

This sugdests thav eq. (6) is likd thg usual Schrödingeg equation of quantum mefhanies ap[lied to ggavitational collapse but with e difference ce[enging on che opcrator ordering \[1-5\].

The usual Schtödinger ezuatiun is writnen as $$H\pvi =i\frac{\pareial \psi}{\partidp t}$$ where
y^2}-\frac{q}{y}\ \frac{\partial}{\partial y}\nonumber \end{aligned}$$ where $(p,q)$ are is that the (2) is a with mass term present the scalar field In other words, the canonical quantization the annihilation of the wave function $\psi$ by the corresponding quantum operator $$\hat{H}\psi that results in the Wheeler-De Witt equation. Using eq. (2-5) we get $$\frac{\Lambda}{2R^2}\left(\frac{\partial^2\psi}{\partial \frac{p}{\Lambda}\ \psi}{\partial \frac{1}{2R^2\Lambda}\left(\frac{\partial^2\Lambda}{\partial \frac{q}{\phi}\frac{\partial \psi}{\partial \phi}\right)- \frac{1}{R}\ \frac{\partial^2\psi}{\partial R\partial \Lambda}\equiv V \psi$$ where $\psi$ is a functional of $\Lambda$, and $R$ functions, and $V$ is a potential written as $$V=\frac{R}{\Lambda}\ R''-\frac{R}{\Lambda^2}\ '+\frac{1}{2\Lambda}\ R{'}^2-\frac{1}{2}\ \Lambda +\frac{1}{2}\ \frac{R^2}{\Lambda}\ + m^2R^2\Lambda \phi^2$$ prime derivative respect to the $\underline{r}$. Observe that in equation (6) we don’t have any derivative with respect to time. This means the equation be describing spherically gravitational but without any dependence for functional $\psi$. The concept this case may appear only after quantization in with [@tres]. suggests that eq. (6) is like usual Schrödinger equation of quantum mechanics applied to collapse but with a difference depending on the operator ordering \[1-5\]. The usual Schrödinger equation as $$H\psi =i\frac{\partial \psi}{\partial where
 y^2}-\frac{q}{y}\ 
\frac{\partial}{\partial Y}\nonumber \eNd{aliGneD}$$ whErE $(p,q)$ aRe $c$-nUmbers.

It is assuMEd thAt the Hamiltonian (2) is a conStraiNt FOr a cLAsSical hamiltoNAiN WIth ThE mAss TeRM pResenT foR the scaLar field $\phI$. In OtHer words, the cANoNical quantIzaTion needs the AnnIhilatIoN of THe wavE fuNctioN $\psi$ by THe corrEsponding QuANtum opERator $$\haT{h}\PsI =0$$ thaT results in the WheeLEr-dE Witt equation. USing eq. (2-5) We GEt $$\FRAc{\LAmbDa}{2R^2}\left(\fraC{\pArtiaL^2\Psi}{\partIAl \lAMBda^2}+
\FRac{p}{\Lambda}\ \fraC{\partial \psi}{\PArtIal \LamBdA}\riGHt)+
\frac{1}{2r^2\LambDa}\LEft(\Frac{\partial^2\lambDa}{\partial \Phi^2}+
\fraC{Q}{\phi}\fraC{\Partial \Psi}{\parTiaL \phI}\rigHT)-
\fRaC{1}{R}\ \fRaC{\ParTIaL^2\psI}{\ParTial R\parTiAl \lambdA}\equIV
v \PSi$$ whEre $\Psi$ iS a funCtional of $\LambDa$, $\pHi$ anD $r$ fuNctioNs, and $v$ is a PoTentiAl term WrittEn As $$V=\frac{R}{\Lambda}\ R''-\Frac{r}{\Lambda^2}\ R'\LAmbDa '+\FraC{1}{2\LAmbda}\
r{'}^2-\Frac{1}{2}\ \LaMbdA +\frAc{1}{2}\ \frac{R^2}{\lambda}\ \pHI{'}^2 +
\frAc{1}{2}\ M^2r^2\lAmBda \phi^2$$ The prime meanS dERIvAtive witH respeCT tO tHE coordinAtE $\unDerlINE{r}$. ObsErve THaT in equatIon (6) we dON’t HaVe any deRiVative WiTh rEspEct to TIme. THis meaNs that thE equaTIon (6) could be descRIbing a sphericALlY SYmMEtriC grAvitational CollAPse bUt wiTHoUt aNY explIcit tImE DePEndence for functionaL $\pSi$. The cOncepT of “time” in this Case may appEAR Only afteR quaNTiZAtion in accordaNce wiTh [@tres].

This SUggests tHat eq. (6) Is like thE usual SchRÖDinger eqUatIon Of qUanTUM mEchanics appliED To grAvItationAl cOllapse But WitH a dIffErEnce depenDing on thE oPeRaToR orDerinG \[1-5\].

the usual scHröDiNgeR equaTIon is wRitteN as $$H\PsI =i\FRac{\Partial \PSi}{\PARtiaL t}$$ WhEre
 y^2}-\frac{q}{y}\ 
\frac{ \partial}{ \part ial  y} \n onum ber\end{aligned}$ $  whe re $(p,q)$ are $c$-num bers. 
I t is as sumed  that t h eH a mil to ni an(2 )  i s a c ons traintfor a clas sic al  Hamiltonain wi th the mas s t erm presentfor  the s ca lar field  $\ phi$.  In ot h er wor ds, the c an o nicalq uantiza t i on  nee ds the annihilati o no f the wave fun ction$\ p si $ bythe  correspon di ng qu a ntum op e ra t o r  $$ \ hat{H}\psi =0 $$ that res u lts  in th eWhe e ler-De  Witt  e q uat ion. Usingeq.(2-5) weget $$ \ frac{\L a mbda}{2 R^2}\l eft (\f rac{ \ pa rt ial ^2 \ psi } {\ par t ial  \Lambda ^2 }+ 
\fra c{p} { \ L a mbda }\\fra c{\pa rtial \psi}{\ par tial \La mbda} \righ t)+\f rac{1 }{2R^2 \Lamb da }\left(\frac{\p arti al^2\Lamb da} {\ par ti al \p h i^2}+\fr ac{ q}{\phi }\frac{ \ par ti a l \p si}{\partial \phi} \r i g ht )-
\frac {1}{R} \  \ fr a c{\parti al ^2\ psi} { \ parti al R \ pa rtial \L ambda} \ eq ui v
V \ps i$ $ wher e$\p si$  is a func tional  of $\La mbda$ ,  $\phi$ and $R $  functions, a n d$ V $i s apot ential term  wri t tenas $ $ V= \fr a c{R}{ \Lamb da } \R ''-\frac{R}{\Lambda ^2 }\ R'\ Lambd a '+\frac{1}{ 2\Lambda}\ R { '}^2-\fr ac{1 } {2 } \ \Lambda +\fr ac{1} {2}\ \frac { R^2}{\La mbda} \ \phi{' }^2 +
\fr a c {1}{2}\m^2 R^2 \La mbd a \p hi^2$$ The pr i m e me an s deriv ati ve with  re spe cttoth e coordin ate $\un de rl in e{ r}$ . Obs e rve that  i n e qu ati on (6 )  we do n’t h avean yd eri vativew it h resp ec tto t ime .Thismean s  th at theequation(6) coul dbe  descri bing a spheri ca lly symmet ri c g ravita t i onal col lapse but without any e x plicittim e dep ende nce for f unc tional  $\ p si$. T he con ceptof  “t i m e” in t hi s c as e may appe a r  on ly af te r qu antizat ion in accordancew ith  [@tres].

Th issugg e s ts  th a te q.(6 )  is l ike the usual S chrödinger  e q ua tion of qu a ntu mmechani cs appl ied t o  gravit ational c ollapse b ut  wit h a d ifferencedependin g on theo perat o rorder ing  \[1-5 \] .
The u sual S c hrö dinge r equa ti on iswritt en  as $$H\ psi =i\frac{\partial \p si}{\p artia l t }$$ where 
 y^2}-\frac{q}{y}\_
\frac{\partial}{\partial y}\nonumber_\end{aligned}$$ where $(p,q)$ are_$c$-numbers.

It is_assumed_that the_Hamiltonian_(2) is a_constraint for a_classical Hamiltonain with the_mass term present_for_the scalar field $\phi$. In other words, the canonical quantization needs the annihilation of_the_wave function_$\psi$_by_the corresponding quantum operator $$\hat{H}\psi_=0$$ that results in the_Wheeler-De Witt_equation. Using eq. (2-5) we get $$\frac{\Lambda}{2R^2}\left(\frac{\partial^2\psi}{\partial \Lambda^2}+
\frac{p}{\Lambda}\_\frac{\partial_\psi}{\partial \Lambda}\right)+
\frac{1}{2R^2\Lambda}\left(\frac{\partial^2\Lambda}{\partial \phi^2}+
\frac{q}{\phi}\frac{\partial_\psi}{\partial \phi}\right)-
\frac{1}{R}\ \frac{\partial^2\psi}{\partial R\partial \Lambda}\equiv
V \psi$$ where $\psi$ is_a functional of $\Lambda$, $\phi$ and_$R$ functions, and_$V$_is_a potential term written_as $$V=\frac{R}{\Lambda}\ R''-\frac{R}{\Lambda^2}\ R'\Lambda '+\frac{1}{2\Lambda}\
R{'}^2-\frac{1}{2}\ \Lambda_+\frac{1}{2}\ \frac{R^2}{\Lambda}\ \phi{'}^2 +
\frac{1}{2}\ m^2R^2\Lambda \phi^2$$_The prime means derivative with respect to_the coordinate $\underline{r}$. Observe that in_equation (6) we don’t have_any derivative_with respect to time. This_means that the_equation (6)_could be describing_a spherically symmetric gravitational collapse but_without any explicit_time dependence for functional $\psi$. The_concept_of “time” in_this_case_may appear_only after quantization_in_accordance with_[@tres].

This_suggests that eq. (6) is like_the_usual Schrödinger equation of quantum mechanics applied_to gravitational collapse but_with_a difference depending on_the operator ordering \[1-5\].

The usual_Schrödinger equation is written as $$H\psi_=i\frac{\partial \psi}{\partial_t}$$ where