 with $\Delta P$ spanning 4 decades — also merits attention. To some degree, it could be a result of the small size of the sample (7 objects) used to derive $\zeta$. On the other hand, there may be some other explanations, e.g. the aforementioned long-term spin evolution converging to some “attractor state” [@Neishtadt].

This discussion makes it clear that measurements of $\zeta$ have a potential to help constrain the physics of cometary outgassing — its geometry, intensity, etc. — at least in a statistical sense. Better characterization of the distribution of $\zeta$ can have substantial impact on our understanding of cometary activity. This provides strong motivation for increasing the number of objects with measured $\Delta P$ and $a_{\rm ng}$. Right now the most basic properties of this distribution represented by equation (\[eq:stats\]) are based on a sample of only 7 objects. Targeted observations of many other comets aimed at measuring their spin variations would allow us to characterize the distribution of $\zeta$ much better. According to Figure \[fig:comets\], even period measurements with uncertainly of tens of minutes may reveal spin variability for dozens of comets with high $\Delta\Omega_1$ (the ones above the blue line in this figure).

The objects with highest $\Delta\Omega_1$ listed in the Table \[table:fast\] should have the best chance for revealing such changes, even though only one comet from Table \[table:zeta\] (41P/Tuttle-Giacobini-Kresák) has $\Delta\Omega_1>10^{-3}$ s$^{-1}$ necessary for being listed in Table \[table:fast\]. Although we focused on studying the spin period variability of comets, non-gravitational forced precession [@Whipple; @Sekanina1984] should also be substantial for these objects, likely driving them into excited rotational state.

Implications for Solar System comets {#sect:disc_SS}
------------------------------------

Our calculations demonstrate that many Solar System comets (the ones with high $\Delta\Omega_1$) should exhibit rapid evolution of their rotation. Using equations (\[eq:spinev\]) and (\[eq:a\_ng\]) one can estimate the characteristic timescale for the cometary spin evolution $\tau_\Omega=|\Omega/\dot\Omega|$ as \_&=& \^[-1]{} \[eq:tau\_Om\]\
&& 670
with $ \Delta P$ spanning 4 decades — also merits care. To some academic degree, it could be a consequence of the small size of the sample (7 aim) used to derive $ \zeta$. On the early hand, there may be some other explanations, for example the aforesaid long - term tailspin evolution converging to some “ attraction department of state ” [ @Neishtadt ]. 

 This discussion makes it clear that measurements of $ \zeta$ have a potential to help oneself constrain the physics of cometary outgassing — its geometry, intensity, etc. — at least in a statistical common sense. Better characterization of the distribution of $ \zeta$ can receive hearty impact on our sympathy of cometary activity. This provides strong motivation for increase the number of objects with measured $ \Delta P$ and $ a_{\rm ng}$. Right now the about basic property of this distribution represented by equation (\[eq: stats\ ]) are based on a sample of only 7 objects. Targeted observations of many other comet aim at measuring their tailspin variation would leave us to characterize the distribution of $ \zeta$ much better. According to Figure \[fig: comets\ ], even period measurements with uncertainly of ten of minutes may reveal spin variability for dozens of comets with gamey $ \Delta\Omega_1 $ (the ones above the blue line in this figure). 

 The aim with high $ \Delta\Omega_1 $ listed in the Table \[table: fast\ ] should have the best chance for revealing such change, even though only one comet from Table \[table: zeta\ ] (41P / Tuttle - Giacobini - Kresák) has $ \Delta\Omega_1>10^{-3}$ s$^{-1}$ necessary for being listed in Table \[table: fast\ ]. Although we concenter on studying the spin period variability of comet, non - gravitational forced precession [ @Whipple; @Sekanina1984 ] should also be substantial for these objects, likely drive them into excited rotational state. 

 Implications for Solar System comet { # sect: disc_SS } 
 ------------------------------------ 

 Our calculations attest that many Solar System comets (the ones with gamey $ \Delta\Omega_1 $) should exhibit rapid development of their rotation. Using equations (\[eq: spinev\ ]) and (\[eq: a\_ng\ ]) one can estimate the characteristic timescale for the cometary tailspin evolution $ \tau_\Omega=|\Omega/\dot\Omega|$ as \_&= & \^[-1 ] { } \[eq: tau\_Om\]\ 
 & & 670
 wihh $\Delta P$ spanning 4 decxdes — also merijs attenvion. To some deeree, it could be a result of tye smqll size of the sample (7 objects) used to dermve $\zeta$. On the other hakb, thedc may ue some other ewplanations, e.g. the aforemangilned long-term spin evolution converding to slme “attractor ftatt” [@Nqishfadt].

This discussion makes it clear that mtasurements of $\zets$ have a potential to help condtrain the physics of cometari ouetassing — its geometry, putensity, etd. — at least in a statistical sevse. Bztter charaxtwrixdtion of thx distgibution of $\zcna$ can vave sunstantial impagt on oue understanding of coketary activity. Thys providas strong motivatiob dor itcredsine thd nhmuer of obuecvs with meaaured $\Delta P$ and $a_{\rm ng}$. Right njq the most baaic prjpqrties of this distribution represented by equation (\[eq:stats\]) are bqsed on a sample of ojly 7 objests. Targeted observations of many other comets aiked av oeawuving rhfir spin variations would allow us to charactqdiee nhe distribution jf $\zeta$ mucn heyjer. According jo Figuxs \[rig:comets\], even perlod meafuremwnts with uncrrtainly of tens of minutes may reveal fpin variability fox dozens of eomets with high $\Delta\Omega_1$ (the onzs abobe the blue line in ffis figure).

The obgecns whth hightrt $\Delta\Omega_1$ liseed in thx Tabke \[tabld:fasj\] shoulq have the best chance for revealijg sueh chdnges, even though only one comet from Table \[table:zeta\] (41P/Jutdle-Ciacobinn-Kresák) has $\Delta\Omeda_1>10^{-3}$ s$^{-1}$ necessary for benng lirted in Tagle \[tabne:fast\]. Althjugh we focusaf on studyinj the spig peeiod variabkuity of comets, non-gravinauional forxed precession [@Whiiple; @Rskanina1984] should cuwo be substantisl wor tjexe mbjects, likeny dfivkmg thdm into excltea royational state.

Implicdtiohs for Solar Systek gomets {#sext:disc_SS}
------------------------------------

Jur calculatipns demonstrate thwt maiy Soler Sysyem comets (the ones with high $\Delfa\Omega_1$) sjoujd exhibit rwpid evolution oy their rotation. Using equations (\[eq:spinet\]) and (\[eq:a\_ng\]) one can esjimate the characterixuic timescale for ehe cometdry spin evolution $\tqu_\Omega=|\Omega/\dot\Omtga|$ as \_&=& \^[-1]{} \[eq:tau\_Om\]\
&& 670
with $\Delta P$ spanning 4 decades — attention. some degree, could be a of sample (7 objects) to derive $\zeta$. the other hand, there may be other explanations, e.g. the aforementioned long-term spin evolution converging to some “attractor state” This discussion makes it clear that measurements of $\zeta$ have a potential to constrain physics cometary — its geometry, intensity, etc. — at least in a statistical sense. Better characterization of the of $\zeta$ can have substantial impact on our of cometary activity. This strong motivation for increasing the of with measured P$ $a_{\rm Right now the basic properties of this distribution represented by equation (\[eq:stats\]) are based on a sample of only 7 Targeted observations other comets at their variations would allow characterize the distribution of $\zeta$ much Figure \[fig:comets\], even period measurements with uncertainly of of minutes reveal spin variability for dozens of with high $\Delta\Omega_1$ (the ones above the blue in this figure). The objects with highest $\Delta\Omega_1$ listed in the Table \[table:fast\] should have chance for revealing such even though only comet Table (41P/Tuttle-Giacobini-Kresák) $\Delta\Omega_1>10^{-3}$ s$^{-1}$ for being listed in Table \[table:fast\]. Although we focused on studying spin period variability of comets, non-gravitational forced precession [@Whipple; @Sekanina1984] be for these objects, driving them into excited state. for Solar System comets Our demonstrate System (the with high $\Delta\Omega_1$) should rapid evolution of their rotation. equations (\[eq:spinev\]) and (\[eq:a\_ng\]) timescale for the cometary spin evolution $\tau_\Omega=|\Omega/\dot\Omega|$ as \^[-1]{} \[eq:tau\_Om\]\ && 670
 with $\Delta P$ spanning 4 decades — Also merits AttenTioN. To SoMe deGree, It could be a resuLT of tHe small size of the sample (7 ObjecTs) USed tO DeRive $\zEta$. On thE OtHER haNd, ThEre MaY Be Some oTheR explanAtions, e.g. thE afOrEmentioned loNG-tErm spin evoLutIon converginG to Some “atTrActOR statE” [@NeIshtaDt].

This DIscussIon makes iT cLEar thaT MeasureMENtS of $\zEta$ have a potential TO hELp constrain the PhysicS oF CoMETarY ouTgassing — itS gEometRY, intensITy, ETC. — At lEAst in a statistIcal sense. BeTTer CharacTeRizATion of The diStRIbuTion of $\zeta$ cAn haVe substanTial imPAct on ouR UnderstAnding Of cOmeTary ACtIvIty. thIS prOViDes STroNg motivaTiOn For inCreaSING The nUmbEr of ObjecTs with measureD $\DeLta P$ ANd $a_{\Rm ng}$. RIght nOw thE mOst baSic proPertiEs Of this distributIon rEpresenteD by EqUatIoN (\[eq:stATs\]) are bAseD on A sample Of only 7 oBJecTs. tARGeTed observations of mAnY OThEr comets Aimed aT MeAsURing theiR sPin VariATIons wOuld ALlOw us to chAracteRIzE tHe distrIbUtion oF $\zEta$ MucH bettER. AccOrding To Figure \[Fig:coMEts\], even period mEAsurements witH UnCERtAInly Of tEns of minuteS may REveaL spiN VaRiaBIlity For doZeNS oF Comets with high $\Delta\omEga_1$ (the Ones aBove the blue liNe in this fiGURE).

The objeCts wITh HIghest $\Delta\OmeGa_1$ lisTed in the TaBLe \[table:fAst\] shOuld have The best chANCe for revEalIng SucH chANGeS, even though onLY One cOmEt from TAblE \[table:zEta\] (41p/TuTtlE-GiAcObini-KresÁk) has $\DelTa\omEgA_1>10^{-3}$ s$^{-1}$ NecEssarY For being LiSteD iN TaBle \[taBLe:fast\]. althoUgh wE fOcUSed On studyINg THE spiN pErIod vAriAbIlity Of coMEts, Non-gravItational ForCEd prEcEsSion [@WhiPple; @Sekanina1984] sHoUld also be sUbStaNtial fOR These objEcts, likely driving them inTO exciteD roTatioNal sTate.

ImpliCatIons foR SoLAr SystEm comeTs {#secT:dIsc_ss}
------------------------------------

our caLCUlAtiOnS demonstraTE ThaT many soLar SYstem coMets (the ones with higH $\delTa\Omega_1$) should ExhIbit RAPiD evOLuTIon Of THeiR ROtation. Using equAtions (\[eq:spInEV\]) aNd (\[eq:a\_ng\]) one CAn eStImate thE characTerisTIc timesCale for thE cometary SpIn evOLUtiOn $\tau_\Omega=|\omega/\dot\omega|$ as \_&=& \^[-1]{} \[eq:TAu\_Om\]\
&& 670
 with $\Delta P$ spanning4 decades— als o m eri ts  att enti on. To some de g ree,  it could be a resultof th es mall si ze of  the sa m pl e (7ob je cts )u se d toder ive $\z eta$. On t heot her hand, th e re  may be so meother explan ati ons, e .g . t h e afo rem entio ned lo n g-term  spin evo lu t ion co n verging t osome  “attractor state ”  [ @ Neishtadt].

T his di sc u ss i o n m ake s it clear  t hat m e asureme n ts o f  $\ z eta$ have a p otential to hel p cons tr ain the ph ysics  o f  co metary outg assi ng — itsgeomet r y, inte n sity, e tc. —atlea st i n  a  s tat is t ica l  s ens e . B etter ch ar ac teriz atio n o f  the  di stri butio n of $\zeta$can  hav e  su bstan tialimpa ct  on o ur und ersta nd ing of cometary  act ivity. Th ispr ovi de s str o ng mot iva tio n for i ncreasi n g t he n u mb er of objects with  m e a su red $\De lta P$ an d$ a_{\rm n g} $.Righ t now t he m o st  basic p ropert i es  o f thisdi stribu ti onrep resen t ed b y equa tion (\[ eq:st a ts\]) are base d  on a sampleo fo n ly 7 ob jec ts. Targete d ob s erva tion s  o f m a ny ot her c om e ts aimed at measuringth eir sp in va riations woul d allow us t o  charact eriz e  t h e distribution  of $ \zeta$ muc h  better.  Acco rding to  Figure \ [ f ig:comet s\] , e ven  pe r i od  measurements w ithun certain lyof tens  of  mi nut esma y revealspin var ia bi li ty  fo r doz e ns of co me tswi thhigh$ \Delta \Omeg a_1$  ( th e  on es abov e  t h e  blu eli ne i n t hi s fig ure) . 

T he obje cts withhig h est$\ De lta\Ome ga_1$ listedin  the Table  \ [ta ble:fa s t \] shoul d have the best chancef or reve ali ng su ch c hanges, e ven  thoug h o n ly one  comet  from  T abl e \[tab l e :z eta \]  (41P/Tutt l e -Gi acobi ni -Kre sák) ha s $\Delta\Omega_1> 1 0^{ -3}$ s$^{-1}$  ne cess a r yfor be i ngli s ted i n Table \[table :fast\]. A lt h ou gh we focu s edon  studyi ng thespinp eriod v ariabilit y of come ts , no n - gra vitational  forcedprecessio n  [@Wh i pp le; @ Sek anina1 98 4]shoul d also besubst antial  f or the se ob je cts, lik ely driving them into e xcited  rota tio nal state .
I mpl icationsforSolar Syst emcom ets { #se c t:dis c_SS } 
- --- - ----- ---- - --------- - -- --- - - -- --

Our cal c u l ati ons d emo n strate  tha t many Solar Syst e m comets (theones w ith  hi g h $\ De lta\Omega_1$)sho ul d exhibitra pid evoluti on of th ei r  rota tion.Usingequatio n s  ( \ [eq:sp inev \])  and (\[e q:a \_ n g\]) on eca n  estim ateth e char acteri s tict i mescale for thecomet a r y spi n  ev oluti on  $\tau_ \ Omeg a=|\Omega/ \dot\Omega| $ as \ _&=&  \^[- 1]{} \[ eq :tau\_ Om\ ]\ 
&& 670
 with_$\Delta P$_spanning 4 decades —_also merits_attention._To some_degree,_it could be_a result of_the small size of_the sample (7_objects)_used to derive $\zeta$. On the other hand, there may be some other explanations,_e.g._the aforementioned_long-term_spin_evolution converging to some “attractor_state” [@Neishtadt].

This discussion makes it_clear that_measurements of $\zeta$ have a potential to help_constrain_the physics of_cometary outgassing — its geometry, intensity, etc. — at_least in a statistical sense. Better_characterization of the_distribution_of_$\zeta$ can have substantial_impact on our understanding of cometary_activity. This provides strong motivation for_increasing the number of objects with measured_$\Delta P$ and $a_{\rm ng}$. Right_now the most basic properties_of this_distribution represented by equation (\[eq:stats\])_are based on_a sample_of only 7_objects. Targeted observations of many other_comets aimed at_measuring their spin variations would allow_us_to characterize the_distribution_of_$\zeta$ much_better. According to_Figure_\[fig:comets\], even_period_measurements with uncertainly of tens of_minutes_may reveal spin variability for dozens of_comets with high $\Delta\Omega_1$_(the_ones above the blue_line in this figure).

The objects_with highest $\Delta\Omega_1$ listed in the_Table \[table:fast\]_should have_the best chance for revealing such changes, even though only one_comet from Table \[table:zeta\] (41P/Tuttle-Giacobini-Kresák) has_$\Delta\Omega_1>10^{-3}$ s$^{-1}$ necessary for_being listed_in_Table \[table:fast\]. Although_we_focused on_studying the spin period variability of comets,_non-gravitational forced_precession [@Whipple; @Sekanina1984] should also be_substantial for these objects,_likely_driving them into excited rotational state.

Implications_for Solar System comets {#sect:disc_SS}
------------------------------------

Our calculations_demonstrate that many Solar System_comets_(the_ones with high $\Delta\Omega_1$) should_exhibit rapid evolution of their rotation._Using equations (\[eq:spinev\])_and (\[eq:a\_ng\]) one can estimate the characteristic_timescale_for the cometary spin evolution $\tau_\Omega=|\Omega/\dot\Omega|$_as_\_&=& \^[-1]{} \[eq:tau\_Om\]\
&& 670