].

Besides this strong $\Delta J = 2$ propensity rule, one can see from table \[tab:rates2\] and figures \[fig:ratecompare\], \[fig:rate12\] that the rod-like interaction drives large $\Delta J$ transfers. For instance, for T $> 20$ K, rates for $\Delta J > 6$ are generally larger than rates for $\Delta J = 1$, and rates for $\Delta J > 8$ are only one order of magnitude below those for $\Delta J = 2$. This behaviour is likely to emphasize the role of collisional effects versus radiative ones. This effect, of purely geometric origin, has been predicted previously [@bosanac80] and is of even greater importance for longer rods like $\rm HC_5N$, $\rm HC_7N$, $\rm HC_9N$, see @snell81 [@dickinson82].

We also observe that the ratio $k_{J_1J'_1}(\textrm{He})/k_{J_1J'_1}(\mbox{para-H$_2$}) $ is in average close to $1/1.4 \sim 1/\sqrt{2}$, thus confirming the similarity of He and para-[$\rm H_2$]{}as projectiles, as generally assumed. But it is also far from being a constant, as already observed for H$_2$O [@phillips96] or CO [@wernli06]. Our data shows that the $1/\sqrt{2}$ scaling rule results in errors up to 50%.

Population inversion and critical densities
-------------------------------------------

Because of the strong $\Delta J_1=0,2,4$ propensity rule, population inversion could be strengthened if LTE conditions are not met, even neglecting hyperfine effects[^1] [@hunt99]. In order to see the density conditions giving rise to population inversion, we solved the steady-state equations for the population of the $J=0,1,\dots,15$ levels of [$\mathrm{HC_3N}$]{}, including collisions with [$\rm H_2$]{}(densities ranging from $10^2$ to $10^6 \rm\; cm^{-3}$), a black-body photon bath at 2.7 K, in the optically thin approximation, [@goldsmith72] : $$\begin{aligned}
\label{eq:ss}
    \frac{\textmd{d}n_i
]. 

 Besides this strong $ \Delta J = 2 $ propensity rule, one can see from mesa   \[tab: rates2\ ] and visualize \[fig: ratecompare\ ], \[fig: rate12\ ] that the rod - like interaction drives big $ \Delta J$ transfers. For instance, for T $ > 20 $   K, rate for $ \Delta J > 6 $ are broadly larger than rate for $ \Delta J = 1 $, and rates for $ \Delta J > 8 $ are only one club of magnitude below those for $ \Delta J = 2$. This behaviour is probable to emphasize the role of collisional effects versus radiative ones. This effect, of purely geometric origin, has been predict previously [ @bosanac80 ] and is of even greater importance for longer rods like $ \rm HC_5N$, $ \rm HC_7N$, $ \rm HC_9N$, learn @snell81 [ @dickinson82 ]. 

 We also observe that the ratio $ k_{J_1J'_1}(\textrm{He})/k_{J_1J'_1}(\mbox{para - H$_2 $ }) $ is in average near to $ 1/1.4 \sim 1/\sqrt{2}$, thus confirm the similarity of He and para-[$\rm H_2$]{}as projectiles, as generally assumed. But it is besides far from being a constant, as already observed for H$_2$O [ @phillips96 ] or CO [ @wernli06 ]. Our data shows that the $ 1/\sqrt{2}$ scaling rule results in error up to 50% . 

 Population inversion and critical densities 
 ------------------------------------------- 

 Because of the strong $ \Delta J_1=0,2,4 $ propensity rule, population inversion could be strengthened if LTE conditions are not met, even neglecting hyperfine effects[^1 ] [ @hunt99 ]. In order to attend the density conditions feed upgrade to population inversion, we solved the steady - department of state equations for the population of the $ J=0,1,\dots,15 $ levels of [ $ \mathrm{HC_3N}$ ] { }, including collisions with [ $ \rm H_2$]{}(densities range from $ 10 ^ 2 $ to $ 10 ^ 6 \rm\; cm^{-3}$), a black - body photon bath at 2.7   K, in the optically thin approximation, [ @goldsmith72 ]  : $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 \label{eq: ss } 
     \frac{\textmd{d}n_i
].

Besldes this strong $\Delta J = 2$ propensity rolw, one ran see from tacle \[tab:rates2\] and figures \[fig:retecimpart\], \[fig:rate12\] that the fod-like ijteractiin dcives large $\Delte J$ transfers. Rlr iusvance, for T $> 20$ K, tates for $\Denta J > 6$ are getefaply larger than rates for $\Delta J = 1$, and rayed for $\Delta J > 8$ art ogly kne order of magnitude below those for $\Denta J = 2$. This nehaviour is likely to empjasixe the role of colpisional efdectf versus radixtive ones. This effect, of purely geometric origin, has been predicted peevlmusly [@bosanec80] and is of even ngeater hmportamce for longer rovs luke $\rm HC_5N$, $\rm HC_7N$, $\rm IC_9N$, see @snell81 [@dickinfon82].

We alsm kbserve that the eario $k_{B_1J'_1}(\teftrm{Fw})/k_{J_1G'_1}(\mbkx{'arz-H$_2$}) $ is in average cmose to $1/1.4 \sin 1/\sqrt{2}$, thus confirmond the similarify of Re and para-[$\rm H_2$]{}as projectiles, as generallj asaumed. But it is also fae from being a constajt, as alrqady observed for H$_2$O [@phillips96] or CO [@wernli06]. Our dada shkds uhqt thd $1/\sert{2}$ scaling rule results in errors up to 50%.

Popujztook inversion and gritical densities
-------------------------------------------

Nefaife of the strung $\Delta J_1=0,2,4$ propensity rule, populajion ibversion soulc be strengthened if LTE cobditions are bot met, even negleeting hyperfnne efgects[^1] [@hunt99]. In order to see tke denaity conditlons givihe rise to populagiok itversion, we solved the stewdy-state xquatnons for the populwtion of tje $J=0,1,\dots,15$ levels of [$\mathrl{HC_3N}$]{}, nncluging collidions with [$\rm H_2$]{}(densities ranginj from $10^2$ to $10^6 \rk\; wm^{-3}$), d black-bjdy pmoton bath at 2.7 K, in the opticakly thiu appruximation, [@foldsmivh72] : $$\begin{aligged}
\label{eq:ss}
    \frac{\textmd{v}n_i
]. Besides this strong $\Delta J = rule, can see table \[tab:rates2\] and rod-like drives large $\Delta transfers. For instance, T $> 20$ K, rates for J > 6$ are generally larger than rates for $\Delta J = 1$, rates for $\Delta J > 8$ are only one order of magnitude below for J 2$. behaviour is likely to emphasize the role of collisional effects versus radiative ones. This effect, of geometric origin, has been predicted previously [@bosanac80] and of even greater importance longer rods like $\rm HC_5N$, HC_7N$, HC_9N$, see [@dickinson82]. also that the ratio $ is in average close to $1/1.4 \sim 1/\sqrt{2}$, thus confirming the similarity of He and para-[$\rm projectiles, as But it also from a constant, as for H$_2$O [@phillips96] or CO [@wernli06]. that the $1/\sqrt{2}$ scaling rule results in errors to 50%. inversion and critical densities ------------------------------------------- Because the strong $\Delta J_1=0,2,4$ propensity rule, population inversion be strengthened if LTE conditions are not met, even neglecting hyperfine effects[^1] [@hunt99]. In order the density conditions giving to population inversion, solved steady-state for population of $J=0,1,\dots,15$ levels of [$\mathrm{HC_3N}$]{}, including collisions with [$\rm H_2$]{}(densities ranging from to $10^6 \rm\; cm^{-3}$), a black-body photon bath at 2.7 the thin approximation, [@goldsmith72] $$\begin{aligned} \label{eq:ss} \frac{\textmd{d}n_i
].

Besides this strong $\Delta J = 2$ prOpensity ruLe, one Can See FrOm taBle \[tAb:rates2\] and figuREs \[fiG:ratecompare\], \[fig:rate12\] thaT the rOd-LIke iNTeRactiOn driveS LaRGE $\DeLtA J$ TraNsFErS. For iNstAnce, for t $> 20$ K, rates for $\delTa j > 6$ are generallY LaRger than raTes For $\Delta J = 1$, and RatEs for $\DElTa J > 8$ ARe onlY onE ordeR of magNItude bElow those FoR $\delta J = 2$. tHis behaVIOuR is lIkely to emphasize tHE rOLe of collisionaL effecTs VErSUS raDiaTive ones. ThIs EffecT, Of purelY GeOMETriC Origin, has been Predicted prEVioUsly [@boSaNac80] ANd is of Even gReATer Importance fOr loNger rods lIke $\rm Hc_5n$, $\rm HC_7N$, $\rM hC_9N$, see @sNell81 [@diCkiNsoN82].

We aLSo ObSerVe THat THe RatIO $k_{J_1j'_1}(\textrm{HE})/k_{j_1J'_1}(\Mbox{pAra-H$_2$}) $ IS IN AverAge ClosE to $1/1.4 \siM 1/\sqrt{2}$, thus confIrmIng tHE siMilarIty of he anD pAra-[$\rm h_2$]{}as proJectiLeS, as generally assUmed. but it is alSo fAr FroM bEing a COnstanT, as AlrEady obsErved foR h$_2$O [@pHiLLIPs96] Or CO [@wernli06]. Our data sHoWS ThAt the $1/\sqrT{2}$ scaliNG rUlE Results iN eRroRs up TO 50%.

populAtioN InVersion aNd critICaL dEnsitieS
-------------------------------------------

BEcause Of The StrOng $\DeLTa J_1=0,2,4$ pRopensIty rule, pOpulaTIon inversion coULd be strengtheNEd IF lTe CondItiOns are not meT, eveN NeglEctiNG hYpeRFine eFfectS[^1] [@hUNt99]. iN order to see the densiTy ConditIons gIving rise to poPulation inVERSion, we soLved THe STeady-state equaTions For the popuLAtion of tHe $J=0,1,\doTs,15$ levels Of [$\mathrm{Hc_3n}$]{}, IncludinG coLliSioNs wITH [$\rM H_2$]{}(densities raNGIng fRoM $10^2$ to $10^6 \rm\; cm^{-3}$), A blAck-body PhoTon BatH at 2.7 k, iN the opticAlly thin ApPrOxImAtiOn, [@golDSmith72] : $$\begIn{AliGnEd}
\lAbel{eQ:Ss}
    \frac{\TextmD{d}n_i
].

Besides this strong $\ Delta J =2$ pr ope nsi ty  rul e, o ne can see fro m  tab le \[tab:rates2\] andfigur es \[fi g :r ateco mpare\] ,  \ [ f ig: ra te 12\ ]t ha t the  ro d-likeinteractio n d ri ves large $\ D el ta J$ tran sfe rs. For inst anc e, for  T  $> 20$ K , r atesfor $\ D elta J  > 6$ are  g e nerall y  larger t ha n ra tes for $\Delta J =1 $, and rates f or $\D el t aJ > 8 $ a re only on eorder of magn i tu d e bel o w those for $ \Delta J =2 $.This b eh avi o ur islikel yt o e mphasize th e ro le of col lision a l effec t s versu s radi ati veones .  T hi s e ff e ct, of  pu r ely  geometr ic  o rigin , ha s b e en p red icte d pre viously [@bos ana c80] and  is o f eve n gr ea ter i mporta nce f or  longer rods li ke $ \rm HC_5N $,$\ rmHC _7N$, $\rm H C_9 N$,  see @s nell81[ @di ck i n s on 82].

We also obse rv e th at the r atio $ k _{ J_ 1 J'_1}(\t ex trm {He} ) / k_{J_ 1J'_ 1 }( \mbox{pa ra-H$_ 2 $} )$ is in  a verage  c los e t o $1/ 1 .4 \ sim 1/ \sqrt{2} $, th u s confirming t h e similarityo fH e  a n d pa ra- [$\rm H_2$] {}as proj ecti l es , a s  gene rally  a s su m ed. But it is alsofa r from  bein g a constant,  as alread y o bservedforH $_ 2 $O [@phillips9 6] or  CO [@wern l i06]. Ou r dat a showsthat the$ 1 /\sqrt{2 }$sca lin g r u l eresults in er r o rs u pto 50%. 

P opulati oninv ers ion  a nd critic al densi ti es 
- -- --- ----- - -------- -- --- -- --- ----- - ------ -

Be caus eof the  strong $\ D e ltaJ_ 1= 0,2, 4$pr opens ityr ule , popul ation inv ers i on c ou ld  be str engthened ifLT E conditio ns  ar e notm e t, evenneglecting hyperfine ef f ects[^1 ] [ @hunt 99].  In order  to  see t hed ensity  condi tions  g ivi n g  rise t opop ul ation inve r s ion , weso lved  the st eady-state equatio n s f or the popula tio n of t he  $J = 0, 1 ,\d ot s ,15 $ levels of [$\ma thrm{HC_3N }$ ] {} , includin g  co ll isionswith [$ \rm H _ 2$]{}(d ensitiesranging f ro m $1 0 ^ 2$to $10^6 \ rm\; cm^ {-3}$), a black - bo dy ph oto n bath  a t 2 .7 K,  in th e  op tical ly thi napprox imati on , [@gold smith72] : $$\begin{ali gned}\labe l{e q:ss}
   \f r ac{ \textmd{d }n_i 
].

Besides this_strong $\Delta_J = 2$ propensity_rule, one_can_see from_table \[tab:rates2\]_and figures \[fig:ratecompare\],_\[fig:rate12\] that the_rod-like interaction drives large_$\Delta J$ transfers._For_instance, for T $> 20$ K, rates for $\Delta J > 6$ are generally larger_than_rates for_$\Delta_J_= 1$, and rates for_$\Delta J > 8$ are_only one_order of magnitude below those for $\Delta J_=_2$. This behaviour_is likely to emphasize the role of collisional effects_versus radiative ones. This effect, of_purely geometric origin,_has_been_predicted previously [@bosanac80] and_is of even greater importance for_longer rods like $\rm HC_5N$, $\rm_HC_7N$, $\rm HC_9N$, see @snell81 [@dickinson82].

We also_observe that the ratio $k_{J_1J'_1}(\textrm{He})/k_{J_1J'_1}(\mbox{para-H$_2$}) $_is in average close to_$1/1.4 \sim_1/\sqrt{2}$, thus confirming the similarity_of He and_para-[$\rm H_2$]{}as_projectiles, as generally_assumed. But it is also far_from being a_constant, as already observed for H$_2$O_[@phillips96]_or CO [@wernli06]._Our_data_shows that_the $1/\sqrt{2}$ scaling_rule_results in_errors_up to 50%.

Population inversion and critical_densities
-------------------------------------------

Because_of the strong $\Delta J_1=0,2,4$ propensity rule,_population inversion could be_strengthened_if LTE conditions are_not met, even neglecting hyperfine_effects[^1] [@hunt99]. In order to see_the density_conditions giving_rise to population inversion, we solved the steady-state equations for the_population of the $J=0,1,\dots,15$ levels of_[$\mathrm{HC_3N}$]{}, including collisions with_[$\rm H_2$]{}(densities_ranging_from $10^2$ to_$10^6_\rm\; cm^{-3}$),_a black-body photon bath at 2.7 K, in_the optically_thin approximation, [@goldsmith72] : $$\begin{aligned}
\label{eq:ss}
  _ \frac{\textmd{d}n_i