sigma_N}\}$ forms a basis of $F^{n-1}_q$.

As both $\{\Omega(q), \theta_1(q), \cdots, \theta_N(q)\}$ and $\{\Omega(q), \frac{\partial{\Omega(q)}}{\partial\sigma_1},\cdots, \frac{\partial{\Omega(q)}}{\partial\sigma_N}\}$ are bases for $F^{n-1}_q$, there exists $\{X_1, \cdots, X_N\}$ such that $X_k=\sum_{i=1}^N a_{ik} \frac{\partial}{\partial \sigma_i}$ for each $1\leq k\leq N$ such that $$\begin{aligned}
\label{eq1111}\theta_k=X_k(\Omega(q))+\lambda_k\Omega(q)\quad \text{for}\quad 1\leq k\leq N.\end{aligned}$$

Note that we have$X_k(\Omega(q))=X_k(\tau_1(q))\eta_1+\cdots + X_k(\tau_N(q))\eta_N+X_k(g_0(q))$ and $\theta_k=\eta_k+g_k(q)$, where $X_k(g_0(q)), g_k(q)\in \oplus_{k\geq2}H^k(M_q, \Omega^{n-k}(M_q))$. By comparing the types of classes in, we get $$\begin{aligned}
\label{eq2222}
\lambda_k=0, \quad \text{and}\quad X_k(\Omega(q))=\theta_k(q)=\eta_k+g_k(q) \quad\text{for each } 1\leq k\leq N.\end{aligned}$$

Since $\{\theta_1(q), \cdots, \theta_N(q)\}$ are linearly independent set for $F^{n-1}(M_q)$, we know that $\{X_1, \cdots, X_N\}$ are also linearly independent in $T^{1,0}_q({\mathcal{T}})$. Therefore $\{X_1, \cdots, X_N\}$ forms a basis for $T^{1,0}_q({\mathcal{T}})$. Without loss of generality, we may assume $X
sigma_N}\}$ forms a basis of $ F^{n-1}_q$. 

 As both $ \{\Omega(q), \theta_1(q), \cdots, \theta_N(q)\}$ and $ \{\Omega(q), \frac{\partial{\Omega(q)}}{\partial\sigma_1},\cdots, \frac{\partial{\Omega(q)}}{\partial\sigma_N}\}$ are bases for $ F^{n-1}_q$, there exists $ \{X_1, \cdots, X_N\}$ such that $ X_k=\sum_{i=1}^N a_{ik } \frac{\partial}{\partial \sigma_i}$ for each $ 1\leq k\leq N$ such that $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 \label{eq1111}\theta_k = X_k(\Omega(q))+\lambda_k\Omega(q)\quad \text{for}\quad 1\leq k\leq N.\end{aligned}$$ 

 notice that we have$X_k(\Omega(q))=X_k(\tau_1(q))\eta_1+\cdots + X_k(\tau_N(q))\eta_N+X_k(g_0(q))$ and $ \theta_k=\eta_k+g_k(q)$, where $ X_k(g_0(q) ), g_k(q)\in \oplus_{k\geq2}H^k(M_q, \Omega^{n - k}(M_q))$. By compare the types of classes in, we arrive $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 \label{eq2222 } 
 \lambda_k=0, \quad \text{and}\quad X_k(\Omega(q))=\theta_k(q)=\eta_k+g_k(q) \quad\text{for each } 1\leq k\leq N.\end{aligned}$$ 

 Since $ \{\theta_1(q), \cdots, \theta_N(q)\}$ are linearly autonomous set for $ F^{n-1}(M_q)$, we know that $ \{X_1, \cdots, X_N\}$ are also linearly autonomous in $ T^{1,0}_q({\mathcal{T}})$. consequently $ \{X_1, \cdots, X_N\}$ forms a basis for $ T^{1,0}_q({\mathcal{T}})$. Without loss of generality, we may assume $ adam
sigla_N}\}$ forms a basis of $F^{n-1}_q$.

Xs both $\{\Omega(q), \jhwta_1(q), \cvots, \thsta_N(q)\}$ ana $\{\Omega(q), \frac{\partial{\Omega(q)}}{\pactiao\sigmq_1},\cdots, \frac{\partial{\Omegx(q)}}{\partial\digma_N}\}$ aee beses for $F^{n-1}_q$, thecs exists $\{X_1, \cdkbs, X_N\}$ wuch that $X_k=\suk_{i=1}^N a_{ik} \frdc{\partial}{\partidl \sngma_i}$ for each $1\leq k\leq N$ such that $$\fegin{alogjed}
\label{eq1111}\thetw_k=X_k(\Piega(s))+\lambda_k\Omega(q)\quad \text{for}\quad 1\leq k\leq N.\tnd{aligned}$$

Note thay we have$X_k(\Omega(q))=X_k(\tau_1(q))\eta_1+\fdotd + X_k(\tau_N(q))\eta_N+X_k(g_0(q))$ and $\theta_k=\gfa_k+d_j(q)$, where $X_k(g_0(d)), g_k(q)\in \oplus_{k\geq2}H^k(M_q, \Kmega^{n-k}(M_q))$. By comparing the typer of elasses in, qe geh $$\begin{alignxd}
\labej{eq2222}
\lambda_k=0, \qmsd \texd{and}\quac X_k(\Omega(q))=\thets_k(q)=\xta_k+t_k(q) \quad\text{for each } 1\leq k\leq N.\end{aligged}$$

Since $\{\dhzta_1(q), \cdots, \theta_N(q)\}$ arw oineatly itdepdbdevt aev fkr $F^{n-1}(M_e)$, wx know that $\{X_1, \cdots, X_N\}$ are also linearly onqvlendent in $T^{1,0}_s({\mathcwl{E}})$. Therefore $\{X_1, \cdots, X_N\}$ forms a basis fog $T^{1,0}_q({\jathcal{T}})$. Without loss od generality, we may adsume $X
sigma_N}\}$ forms a basis of $F^{n-1}_q$. As \theta_1(q), \theta_N(q)\}$ and \frac{\partial{\Omega(q)}}{\partial\sigma_1},\cdots, \frac{\partial{\Omega(q)}}{\partial\sigma_N}\}$ are $\{X_1, X_N\}$ such that a_{ik} \frac{\partial}{\partial \sigma_i}$ each $1\leq k\leq N$ such that \label{eq1111}\theta_k=X_k(\Omega(q))+\lambda_k\Omega(q)\quad \text{for}\quad 1\leq k\leq N.\end{aligned}$$ Note that we have$X_k(\Omega(q))=X_k(\tau_1(q))\eta_1+\cdots + X_k(\tau_N(q))\eta_N+X_k(g_0(q))$ and $\theta_k=\eta_k+g_k(q)$, $X_k(g_0(q)), g_k(q)\in \oplus_{k\geq2}H^k(M_q, \Omega^{n-k}(M_q))$. By comparing the types of classes in, we get \label{eq2222} \quad X_k(\Omega(q))=\theta_k(q)=\eta_k+g_k(q) each } 1\leq k\leq N.\end{aligned}$$ Since $\{\theta_1(q), \cdots, \theta_N(q)\}$ are linearly independent set for $F^{n-1}(M_q)$, we that $\{X_1, \cdots, X_N\}$ are also linearly independent $T^{1,0}_q({\mathcal{T}})$. Therefore $\{X_1, \cdots, forms a basis for $T^{1,0}_q({\mathcal{T}})$. loss generality, we assume
sigma_N}\}$ forms a basis of $F^{n-1}_q$.

As bOth $\{\Omega(q), \tHeta_1(q), \CdoTs, \tHeTa_N(q)\}$ And $\{\OMega(q), \frac{\partiAL{\OmeGa(q)}}{\partial\sigma_1},\cdots, \frAc{\parTiAL{\OmeGA(q)}}{\PartiAl\sigma_n}\}$ ArE BAseS fOr $f^{n-1}_q$, ThERe ExistS $\{X_1, \cDots, X_N\}$ sUch that $X_k=\sUm_{i=1}^n a_{Ik} \frac{\partiaL}{\PaRtial \sigma_I}$ foR each $1\leq k\leq n$ suCh that $$\BeGin{ALigneD}
\laBel{eq1111}\Theta_k=x_K(\Omega(Q))+\lambda_k\OMeGA(q)\quad \TExt{for}\qUAD 1\lEq k\lEq N.\end{aligned}$$

Note THaT We have$X_k(\Omega(q))=x_k(\tau_1(q))\EtA_1+\CdOTS + X_k(\Tau_n(q))\eta_N+X_k(g_0(q))$ AnD $\thetA_K=\eta_k+g_k(Q)$, WhERE $x_k(g_0(Q)), G_k(q)\in \oplus_{k\geQ2}H^k(M_q, \Omega^{n-K}(m_q))$. BY compaRiNg tHE types Of claSsES in, We get $$\begin{aLignEd}
\label{eq2222}
\Lambda_K=0, \Quad \texT{And}\quad x_k(\OmegA(q))=\tHetA_k(q)=\eTA_k+G_k(Q) \quAd\TExt{FOr EacH } 1\Leq K\leq N.\end{AlIgNed}$$

SiNce $\{\tHETA_1(Q), \cdoTs, \tHeta_n(q)\}$ are Linearly indepEndEnt sET foR $F^{n-1}(M_q)$, We knoW thaT $\{X_1, \Cdots, x_N\}$ are aLso liNeArly independent In $T^{1,0}_q({\Mathcal{T}})$. THerEfOre $\{x_1, \cDots, X_n\}$ Forms a BasIs fOr $T^{1,0}_q({\matHcal{T}})$. WiTHouT lOSS Of Generality, we may assUmE $x
sigma_N}\}$ forms a basisof $F^{n-1 }_q$. 

A s b ot h $\ {\Om ega(q), \theta _ 1(q) , \cdots, \theta_N(q)\ }$ an d$ \{\O m eg a(q),  \frac{ \ pa r t ial {\ Om ega (q ) }} {\par tia l\sigma _1},\cdots , \ fr ac{\partial{ \ Om ega(q)}}{\ par tial\sigma_N }\} $ areba ses for $ F^{ n-1}_ q$, th e re exi sts $\{X_ 1, \cdots ,  X_N\}$ s uc h th at $X_k=\sum_{i=1 } ^N a_{ik} \frac{\ partia l} { \p a r tia l \ sigma_i}$fo r eac h  $1\leq k\ l e q  N$ such that $$\ begin{align e d}\label {e q11 1 1}\the ta_k= X_ k (\O mega(q))+\l ambd a_k\Omega (q)\qu a d \text { for}\qu ad 1\l eqk\l eq N . \e nd {al ig n ed} $ $
No t e t hat we h av e$ X_k(\ Omeg a ( q ) )=X_ k(\ tau_ 1(q)) \eta_1+\cdots  +X_k( \ tau _N(q) )\eta _N+X _k (g_0( q))$ a nd $\ th eta_k=\eta_k+g_ k(q) $, where$X_ k( g_0 (q )), g _ k(q)\i n \ opl us_{k\g eq2}H^k ( M_q ,\ O m eg a^{n-k}(M_q))$. By  c o m pa ring the  types of  c l asses in ,weget$ $ \begi n{al i gn ed}
\lab el{eq2 2 22 }\lambda _k =0, \q ua d \ tex t{and } \qua d X_k( \Omega(q ))=\t h eta_k(q)=\eta_ k +g_k(q) \quad \ te x t {f o r ea ch} 1\leq k\l eq N . \end {ali g ne d}$ $ 

Sin ce $\ {\ t he t a_1(q), \cdots, \th et a_N(q) \}$ a re linearly i ndependent s e t for $F ^{n- 1 }( M _q)$, we knowthat$\{X_1, \c d ots, X_N \}$ a re alsolinearlyi n dependen t i n $ T^{ 1,0 } _ q( {\mathcal{T}} ) $ . Th er efore $ \{X _1, \cd ots , X _N\ }$fo rms a bas is for $ T^ {1 ,0 }_ q({ \math c al{T}})$ .Wit ho utlosso f gene ralit y, w ema y  as sume $X 
sigma_N}\}$ forms_a basis_of $F^{n-1}_q$.

As both $\{\Omega(q),_\theta_1(q), \cdots,_\theta_N(q)\}$_and $\{\Omega(q),_\frac{\partial{\Omega(q)}}{\partial\sigma_1},\cdots,_\frac{\partial{\Omega(q)}}{\partial\sigma_N}\}$ are bases_for $F^{n-1}_q$, there_exists $\{X_1, \cdots, X_N\}$_such that $X_k=\sum_{i=1}^N_a_{ik}_\frac{\partial}{\partial \sigma_i}$ for each $1\leq k\leq N$ such that $$\begin{aligned}
\label{eq1111}\theta_k=X_k(\Omega(q))+\lambda_k\Omega(q)\quad \text{for}\quad 1\leq k\leq N.\end{aligned}$$

Note_that_we have$X_k(\Omega(q))=X_k(\tau_1(q))\eta_1+\cdots_+_X_k(\tau_N(q))\eta_N+X_k(g_0(q))$_and $\theta_k=\eta_k+g_k(q)$, where $X_k(g_0(q)), g_k(q)\in_\oplus_{k\geq2}H^k(M_q, \Omega^{n-k}(M_q))$. By comparing the_types of_classes in, we get $$\begin{aligned}
\label{eq2222}
\lambda_k=0, \quad \text{and}\quad X_k(\Omega(q))=\theta_k(q)=\eta_k+g_k(q)_\quad\text{for_each } 1\leq_k\leq N.\end{aligned}$$

Since $\{\theta_1(q), \cdots, \theta_N(q)\}$ are linearly independent set_for $F^{n-1}(M_q)$, we know that $\{X_1,_\cdots, X_N\}$ are_also_linearly_independent in $T^{1,0}_q({\mathcal{T}})$. Therefore_$\{X_1, \cdots, X_N\}$ forms a basis_for $T^{1,0}_q({\mathcal{T}})$. Without loss of generality,_we may assume $X