a{K(z,\bar z)}={{\rm i}}\left( X^A\frac{\partial}{\partial\bar X^A}\bar F(\bar X)-  \bar X^A
\frac{\partial}{\partial X^A} F(X)\right)\,.$$ On overlap of charts these functions should be related by (inhomogeneous) symplectic transformations $ISp(2n,{{\mbox{\rm$\mbox{I}\!\mbox{R}$}}})$: $$\left( \begin{array}{c}
 X \\ \partial F \end{array}\right)_{(i)} = e^{{{\rm i}}c_{ij}} M_{ij}
\left( \begin{array}{c}
 X \\ \partial F\end{array}\right)_{(j)}+ b_{ij}\,, \label{ISpn}$$ with $$c_{ij}\in {{\mbox{\rm$\mbox{I}\!\mbox{R}$}}}\ ;\qquad M_{ij} \in {\mbox{$Sp\left( 2n,{{\mbox{\rm$\mbox{I}\!\mbox{R}$}}}\right) $}}\ ;\qquad b_{ij} \in
{\mathord{\setlength{\unitlength}{1em}
     \begin{picture}(0.6,0.7)(-0.1,0)
        \put(-0.1,0){\rm C}
        \thicklines
        \put(0.2,0.05){\line(0,1){0.55}}
     \end {picture}}}^{2n} \,,$$ satisfying the cocycle condition on overlaps of 3 charts.

There is, however, a second definition of rigid special [Kähler]{}manifolds, which is based on the symplectic structure, rather than on the prepotential.

A [Kähler]{} manifold is the base manifold of a $U(1)\times I{\mbox{$Sp\left( 2n,{{\mbox{\rm$\mbox{I}\!\mbox{R}$}}}\right) $}}$ bundle. A holomorphic section $\RawSienna{V}(z)$ defines the [Kähler]{} potential by $$\Magenta{K(z,\bar z)}={{\rm i}}{\mbox{$\langle \RawSienna{V}, \RawSienna{{\bar V}} \rangle$}}\,,$$ and it should satisfy the constraint $${\mbox{$\langle \partial_\alpha \Raw
a{K(z,\bar z)}={{\rm i}}\left (X^A\frac{\partial}{\partial\bar X^A}\bar F(\bar X)-   \bar X^A 
 \frac{\partial}{\partial X^A } F(X)\right)\,.$$ On overlap of charts these functions should be related by (inhomogeneous) symplectic transformation $ ISp(2n,{{\mbox{\rm$\mbox{I}\!\mbox{R}$}}})$: $ $ \left (\begin{array}{c } 
  X \\ \partial F \end{array}\right)_{(i) } = e^{{{\rm i}}c_{ij } } M_{ij } 
 \left (\begin{array}{c } 
  ten \\ \partial F\end{array}\right)_{(j)}+ b_{ij}\, , \label{ISpn}$$ with $ $ c_{ij}\in { { \mbox{\rm$\mbox{I}\!\mbox{R}$}}}\; \qquad M_{ij } \in { \mbox{$Sp\left (2n,{{\mbox{\rm$\mbox{I}\!\mbox{R}$}}}\right) $ } } \; \qquad b_{ij } \in 
 { \mathord{\setlength{\unitlength}{1em } 
      \begin{picture}(0.6,0.7)(-0.1,0) 
         \put(-0.1,0){\rm C } 
         \thicklines 
         \put(0.2,0.05){\line(0,1){0.55 } } 
      \end { picture}}}^{2n } \,,$$ satisfying the cocycle condition on overlaps of 3 chart. 

 There is, however, a second definition of rigid particular [ Kähler]{}manifolds, which is base on the symplectic structure, rather than on the prepotential. 

 A [ Kähler ] { }   manifold is the base manifold of a $ U(1)\times I{\mbox{$Sp\left (2n,{{\mbox{\rm$\mbox{I}\!\mbox{R}$}}}\right) $ } } $ pile. A holomorphic section $ \RawSienna{V}(z)$ defines the [ Kähler ] { }   electric potential by $ $ \Magenta{K(z,\bar z)}={{\rm i}}{\mbox{$\langle \RawSienna{V }, \RawSienna{{\bar V } } \rangle$}}\,,$$ and it should satisfy the constraint $ $ { \mbox{$\langle \partial_\alpha \Raw
a{K(z,\har z)}={{\rm i}}\left( X^A\frac{\partlal}{\partial\bar X^A}\yqr F(\bac X)-  \bad X^A
\frac{\oartial}{\partial X^A} F(X)\right)\,.$$ On ocerlak of charts these fjnctions dhould bw reoqted by (inikmogeneous) syjilectnc transformatioks $ISp(2n,{{\mbox{\sm$\mbox{I}\!\mbox{R}$}}})$: $$\lafg( \yegin{array}{c}
 X \\ \partial F \end{array}\rigrt)_{(i)} = e^{{{\rk l}}c_{ij}} M_{ij}
\left( \bggin{agrwy}{c}
 S \\ \partial F\end{array}\right)_{(j)}+ b_{ij}\,, \labsl{ISpn}$$ xith $$c_{ij}\in {{\mbox{\tm$\mbox{I}\!\mbox{R}$}}}\ ;\qquad M_{ij} \in {\lbox{$Dp\left( 2n,{{\mbox{\rm$\mbox{L}\!\mbox{R}$}}}\right) $}}\ ;\qqtqd b_{ij} \in
{\matford{\setlength{\unitlengtg}{1em}
     \begin{picture}(0.6,0.7)(-0.1,0)
        \put(-0.1,0){\fm C}
        \thixkoinfv
        \puv(0.2,0.05){\line(0,1){0.55}}
     \end {pictmge}}}^{2n} \,,$$ sadisfyinb the cocycle gondivion on overlaps of 3 charvs.

There is, however, a second dafnnition of rigid specuao [Kählgr]{}manhfolaw, wficg ms gased ln vhe symplecfic structuee, rather than on tne itepotential.

A [Kähler]{} iagifold is the base manifold of a $U(1)\times I{\mgox{$Sp\left( 2n,{{\mbox{\rm$\mbox{I}\!\mvox{R}$}}}\right) $}}$ bundle. A hllomorphis section $\RawSienna{V}(z)$ defines the [Kähler]{} potential ty $$\Majevta{J(z,\nar x)}={{\em i}}{\mbox{$\langle \RawSienna{V}, \RawSienna{{\bar V}} \rangle$}}\,,$$ znc pt should satisfy the constrsijt $${\ibox{$\langle \pattial_\al'ga \Raw
a{K(z,\bar z)}={{\rm i}}\left( X^A\frac{\partial}{\partial\bar X^A}\bar F(\bar X)- \frac{\partial}{\partial F(X)\right)\,.$$ On of charts these (inhomogeneous) transformations $ISp(2n,{{\mbox{\rm$\mbox{I}\!\mbox{R}$}}})$: $$\left( X \\ \partial \end{array}\right)_{(i)} = e^{{{\rm i}}c_{ij}} M_{ij} \left( X \\ \partial F\end{array}\right)_{(j)}+ b_{ij}\,, \label{ISpn}$$ with $$c_{ij}\in {{\mbox{\rm$\mbox{I}\!\mbox{R}$}}}\ ;\qquad M_{ij} \in {\mbox{$Sp\left( $}}\ ;\qquad b_{ij} \in {\mathord{\setlength{\unitlength}{1em} \begin{picture}(0.6,0.7)(-0.1,0) \put(-0.1,0){\rm C} \thicklines \put(0.2,0.05){\line(0,1){0.55}} \end {picture}}}^{2n} \,,$$ the condition overlaps 3 charts. There is, however, a second definition of rigid special [Kähler]{}manifolds, which is based on symplectic structure, rather than on the prepotential. A manifold is the base of a $U(1)\times I{\mbox{$Sp\left( 2n,{{\mbox{\rm$\mbox{I}\!\mbox{R}$}}}\right) bundle. holomorphic section defines [Kähler]{} by $$\Magenta{K(z,\bar z)}={{\rm \RawSienna{V}, \RawSienna{{\bar V}} \rangle$}}\,,$$ and it should satisfy the constraint $${\mbox{$\langle \partial_\alpha \Raw
a{K(z,\bar z)}={{\rm i}}\left( X^A\frac{\partiAl}{\partial\bAr X^A}\bAr F(\Bar x)-  \bAr X^A
\Frac{\Partial}{\partial x^a} F(X)\rIght)\,.$$ On overlap of charts tHese fUnCTionS ShOuld bE relateD By (INHomOgEnEouS) sYMpLectiC trAnsformAtions $ISp(2n,{{\MboX{\rM$\mbox{I}\!\mbox{R}$}}})$: $$\lEFt( \Begin{array}{C}
 X \\ \pArtial F \end{arRay}\Right)_{(i)} = E^{{{\rM i}}c_{IJ}} M_{ij}
\lEft( \Begin{Array}{c}
 x \\ \PartiaL F\end{arraY}\rIGht)_{(j)}+ b_{iJ}\,, \Label{ISPN}$$ WiTh $$c_{iJ}\in {{\mbox{\rm$\mbox{I}\!\mboX{r}$}}}\ ;\qQUad M_{ij} \in {\mbox{$Sp\Left( 2n,{{\mBoX{\Rm$\MBOx{I}\!\MboX{R}$}}}\right) $}}\ ;\qquAd B_{ij} \in
{\MAthord{\sETlENGTh{\uNItlength}{1em}
     \begIn{picture}(0.6,0.7)(-0.1,0)
        \puT(-0.1,0){\Rm C}
        \ThicklInEs
        \pUT(0.2,0.05){\line(0,1){0.55}}
     \eNd {picTuRE}}}^{2n} \,,$$ sAtisfying thE cocYcle condiTion on OVerlaps OF 3 charts.

there iS, hoWevEr, a sECoNd DefInITioN Of RigID spEcial [KähLeR]{}mAnifoLds, wHICH Is baSed On thE sympLectic structuRe, rAtheR ThaN on thE prepOtenTiAl.

A [KäHler]{} maNifolD iS the base manifolD of a $u(1)\times I{\mbOx{$SP\lEft( 2N,{{\mBox{\rm$\MBox{I}\!\mbOx{R}$}}}\RigHt) $}}$ bundlE. A holomORphIc SECTiOn $\RawSienna{V}(z)$ definEs THE [KÄhler]{} potEntial BY $$\MAgENta{K(z,\bar Z)}={{\rM i}}{\mBox{$\lANGle \RaWSieNNa{v}, \RawSienNa{{\bar V}} \RAnGlE$}}\,,$$ and it sHoUld satIsFy tHe cOnstrAInt $${\mBox{$\lanGle \partiAl_\alpHA \Raw
a{K(z,\bar z)}={{\rm i}}\l eft( X^A\f rac{\ par tia l} {\pa rtia l\bar X^A}\bar F(\b ar X)-  \bar X^A
\frac {\par ti a l}{\ p ar tialX^A} F( X )\ r i ght )\ ,. $$On ov erlap  of  charts  these fun cti on s should ber el ated by (i nho mogeneous) s ymp lectic  t ran s forma tio ns $I Sp(2n, { {\mbox {\rm$\mbo x{ I }\!\mb o x{R}$}} } ) $:  $$\ left( \begin{arra y }{ c }
 X \\ \parti al F \ en d {a r r ay} \ri ght)_{(i)}  =  e^{{ { \rm i}} c _{ i j } } M _ {ij}
\left( \ begin{array } {c} 
 X \\  \ par t ial F\ end{a rr a y}\ right)_{(j) }+ b _{ij}\,,\label { ISpn}$$ with $$ c_{ij} \in  {{ \mbo x {\ rm $\m bo x {I} \ !\ mbo x {R} $}}}\ ;\ qq ua d M_{ ij}\ i n {\mb ox{ $Sp\ left(  2n,{{\mbox{\ rm$ \mbo x {I} \!\mb ox{R} $}}} \r ight)  $}}\;\qqu ad  b_{ij} \in
{\m atho rd{\setle ngt h{ \un it lengt h }{1em} 
   \begin{ picture } (0. 6, 0 . 7 )( -0.1,0)
        \p ut ( - 0. 1,0){\rm  C}
   \thickli ne s
    \put (0.2 , 0. 05){\lin e(0,1) { 0. 55 }}
    \ end {p ic tur e}} }^{2n }  \,, $$ sat isfyingthe c o cycle conditio n  on overlapso f3 ch a rts. 

T here is, ho weve r , aseco n ddef i nitio n ofri g id special [Kähler]{}m an ifolds , whi ch is based o n the symp l e c tic stru ctur e ,r ather than onthe p repotentia l .

A [Kä hler] {} manif old is th e base man ifo ldofa $ U ( 1) \times I{\mbo x { $Sp\ le ft( 2n, {{\ mbox{\r m$\ mbo x{I }\! \m box{R}$}} }\right)  $ }} $bu ndl e. Ah olomorph ic  se ct ion  $\Ra w Sienna {V}(z )$ d ef in e s t he [Käh l er ] { } po te nt ialby$$ \Mage nta{ K (z, \bar z) }={{\rm i }}{ \ mbox {$ \l angle \ RawSienna{V},  \ RawSienna{ {\ bar  V}} \ r a ngle$}}\ ,,$$ and it should sati s fy thecon strai nt $ ${\mbox{$ \la ngle \ par t ial_\a lpha \ Raw
a{K(z,\bar z)}={{\rm_i}}\left( X^A\frac{\partial}{\partial\bar_X^A}\bar F(\bar X)- _\bar X^A
\frac{\partial}{\partial_X^A}_F(X)\right)\,.$$ On_overlap_of charts these_functions should be_related by (inhomogeneous) symplectic_transformations $ISp(2n,{{\mbox{\rm$\mbox{I}\!\mbox{R}$}}})$: $$\left(_\begin{array}{c}
_X \\ \partial F \end{array}\right)_{(i)} = e^{{{\rm i}}c_{ij}} M_{ij}
\left( \begin{array}{c}
 X \\ \partial F\end{array}\right)_{(j)}+_b_{ij}\,,_\label{ISpn}$$ with_$$c_{ij}\in_{{\mbox{\rm$\mbox{I}\!\mbox{R}$}}}\_;\qquad M_{ij} \in {\mbox{$Sp\left( 2n,{{\mbox{\rm$\mbox{I}\!\mbox{R}$}}}\right)_$}}\ ;\qquad b_{ij} \in
{\mathord{\setlength{\unitlength}{1em}
 _ _ \begin{picture}(0.6,0.7)(-0.1,0)
      __\put(-0.1,0){\rm C}
 _      \thicklines
  _     \put(0.2,0.05){\line(0,1){0.55}}
_  __\end_{picture}}}^{2n} \,,$$ satisfying the_cocycle condition on overlaps of 3_charts.

There is, however, a second definition_of rigid special [Kähler]{}manifolds, which is based_on the symplectic structure, rather than_on the prepotential.

A [Kähler]{} manifold is_the base_manifold of a $U(1)\times I{\mbox{$Sp\left(_2n,{{\mbox{\rm$\mbox{I}\!\mbox{R}$}}}\right) $}}$ bundle._A holomorphic_section $\RawSienna{V}(z)$ defines_the [Kähler]{} potential by $$\Magenta{K(z,\bar z)}={{\rm i}}{\mbox{$\langle_\RawSienna{V}, \RawSienna{{\bar V}}_\rangle$}}\,,$$ and it should satisfy the_constraint_$${\mbox{$\langle \partial_\alpha \Raw