 LFPs at each electrode were recorded for 18s while the fly was awake and 18s more after the fly was anaesthetised (isoflurane, 0.6% by volume, through an evaporator). Flies’ unresponsiveness during anaesthesia was confirmed by the absence of behavioural responses to a series of air puffs, and recovery was also confirmed after isoflurane gas was turned off [@CohenEneuro2016].

We used data sampled at 1kHz for the analysis [@CohenEneuro2016], and to obtain an estimate of local neural activity, the 16 electrodes were re-referenced by subtracting adjacent signals giving 15 channels which we parametrise as $c \in [1,15]$. Line noise was removed from the recordings, followed by linear de-trending and removing the mean. The resulting data is a fluctuating voltage signal, which is time-binned (1ms bins) and binarised by splitting over the median, leading to a time series, see Fig. \[fig:workflow\](b).

For each of the 13 flies in our data set, we have 30 time series of length $N = 18,000$. They correspond to the 15 channels, labelled numerically from the central to peripheral region as depicted in Fig. \[fig:workflow\](a), and the two states of conscious arousal. Using the CSSR algorithm [@CSSR2], we construct [$\epsilon\text{-machines}$]{} for each of these time series as a function of maximum memory length within the range $\lambda \in [2,11]$. This is below the memory length $L(N) \sim 14$ beyond which we would be unable to reliably determine transition probabilities for a sequence of length $N$ (see Sec. \[sec:Bkg-cssr\]) [^2]. We record the resulting $3,900$ [$\epsilon\text{-machine}$]{} structures and their corresponding statistical complexities, and group them according to their respective level of conscious arousal, $\psi$, channel location, $c$, and maximum memory length, $\lambda$. Thus, statistical complexity $C_{\mu}$ is a function of the set of parameters $\{\psi,c,\lambda\}$ for each fly, $f$. We are principally interested in the difference in statistical complexity over states of conscious arousal $$\begin{gathered}
\Delta C_{\mu} = C_{\mu}^{\text{wake}} - C_{\mu}^{\text{ana
LFPs at each electrode were recorded for 18s while the fly was awake and eighteen more after the tent-fly was anaesthetised (isoflurane, 0.6% by book, through an evaporator). Flies ’ unresponsiveness during anesthesia was confirmed by the absence of behavioral responses to a series of air travel quilt, and recovery was besides confirm after isoflurane gas was turn off   [ @CohenEneuro2016 ]. 

 We used datum sampled at 1kHz for the analysis   [ @CohenEneuro2016 ], and to obtain an estimate of local neural activity, the 16 electrodes were re - reference by subtracting adjacent signals giving 15 channel which we parametrise as $ c \in [ 1,15]$. Line noise was remove from the recordings, come by linear de - trending and removing the mean. The resulting data is a fluctuating voltage signal, which is meter - binned (1ms bins) and binarised by splitting over the median, leading to a time series, see Fig.   \[fig: workflow\](b). 

 For each of the 13 flies in our data set, we have 30 time series of length $ N = 18,000$. They correspond to the 15 channels, labelled numerically from the cardinal to peripheral area as depicted in Fig.   \[fig: workflow\](a), and the two states of conscious arousal. use the CSSR algorithm   [ @CSSR2 ], we construct [ $ \epsilon\text{-machines}$ ] { } for each of these time series as a affair of maximum memory length within the range $ \lambda \in [ 2,11]$. This is below the memory length $ L(N) \sim 14 $ beyond which we would be ineffective to reliably determine transition probabilities for a sequence of length $ N$ (see Sec.   \[sec: Bkg - cssr\ ])   [ ^2 ]. We record the resulting $ 3,900 $ [ $ \epsilon\text{-machine}$ ] { } structures and their corresponding statistical complexities, and group them harmonize to their respective level of conscious foreplay, $ \psi$, distribution channel location, $ c$, and maximum memory length, $ \lambda$. Thus, statistical complexity $ C_{\mu}$ is a affair of the set of parameters $ \{\psi, c,\lambda\}$ for each fly, $ f$. We are chiefly interested in the dispute in statistical complexity over states of conscious arousal $ $ \begin{gathered } 
 \Delta C_{\mu } = C_{\mu}^{\text{wake } } - C_{\mu}^{\text{ana
 LFOs at each electrode wert recorded for 18s cyile tie fly sas awakd and 18s more after the fly wes abaestyetised (isoflurane, 0.6% by volume, tjrough ab eveporator). Flies’ uidesponslrenesa durnnj anaesthesia wss confirmad by the absetcd lf behavioural responses to a serief of ait ouffs, and recodery ras zlso confirmed after isoflurane gaa was tlrned off [@CohenEneiro2016].

We used data sampled at 1kHz for the analysis [@ClhenEneuro2016], qnd ei obtain an dstimate of local neurzl activity, the 16 electrodes werd re-rzferenced bi auhjracting adjecent fignals givikb 15 chatnels wnich we paramebrise as $c \in [1,15]$. Line noise was removed from the tecordings, fkllowed by linear dw-trenging and eemuvihg tge meaj. Tie resultinf data is a fluctuating voltagt sytnal, which is time-bynged (1ms bins) and binarised by splitting mved the median, leading to a time series, see Fih. \[fig:workfjow\](b).

For each of the 13 flies in our data set, we hava 30 tijd strlcs ow lfngth $N = 18,000$. They correspond to the 15 channels, lafslkec numerically nrom the central tp oetypheral regiov as dzlidted in Fig. \[fig:workvlow\](a), agd thw two staues og conscious arousal. Using tye CSSR algogithn [@CSSR2], we construct [$\epsilon\texc{-machimes}$]{} fpr each of these time szries zs a functiln of maxjoum memory lengtf wpthit the range $\lambda \in [2,11]$. Thif is belox the memory lenbth $L(N) \sim 14$ beyojd whlwh we would be unahle tl seliably dftermine transition probabilitixx for a sequgnca ox length $N$ (sec Sec. \[sec:Bkg-cssr\]) [^2]. We record the resultnng $3,900$ [$\eosilon\text{-jachine}$]{} structures and their costesponding stetistical complexuties, ava group them avcording no theur respective levek ow conscious arouwal, $\psi$, channel lovatkon, $c$, aid mavhmum memory nenggh, $\usmbda$. Thus, suctiwgicak complexity $C_{\mu}$ is d fuhction of the set pf parametgrs $\{\psi,c,\lwmbda\}$ for eacn fly, $f$. We are prijcipanly intetesjed in the difference in statisfical comolewity over staees if conscious arousal $$\begin{gathered}
\Delta C_{\mu} = C_{\mu}^{\texv{wake}} - C_{\mu}^{\text{ana
LFPs at each electrode were recorded for the was awake 18s more after 0.6% volume, through an Flies’ unresponsiveness during was confirmed by the absence of responses to a series of air puffs, and recovery was also confirmed after gas was turned off [@CohenEneuro2016]. We used data sampled at 1kHz for the [@CohenEneuro2016], to an of local neural activity, the 16 electrodes were re-referenced by subtracting adjacent signals giving 15 channels we parametrise as $c \in [1,15]$. Line noise removed from the recordings, by linear de-trending and removing mean. resulting data a voltage which is time-binned bins) and binarised by splitting over the median, leading to a time series, see Fig. \[fig:workflow\](b). For of the in our set, have time series of = 18,000$. They correspond to the numerically from the central to peripheral region as in Fig. and the two states of conscious Using the CSSR algorithm [@CSSR2], we construct [$\epsilon\text{-machines}$]{} each of these time series as a function of maximum memory length within the range [2,11]$. This is below memory length $L(N) 14$ which would unable to determine transition probabilities for a sequence of length $N$ (see Sec. [^2]. We record the resulting $3,900$ [$\epsilon\text{-machine}$]{} structures and their complexities, group them according their respective level of arousal, channel location, $c$, and length, Thus, is function the set of parameters for each fly, $f$. We principally interested in the states of conscious arousal $$\begin{gathered} \Delta C_{\mu} = - C_{\mu}^{\text{ana
 LFPs at each electrode were reCorded for 18s While The Fly WaS awaKe anD 18s more after the FLy waS anaesthetised (isofluraNe, 0.6% by vOlUMe, thROuGh an eVaporatOR). FLIEs’ uNrEsPonSiVEnEss duRinG anaestHesia was coNfiRmEd by the absenCE oF behaviourAl rEsponses to a sEriEs of aiR pUffS, And reCovEry waS also cONfirmeD after isoFlURane gaS Was turnED OfF [@CohEnEneuro2016].

We used datA SaMPled at 1kHz for thE analySiS [@coHENEnEurO2016], and to obtaIn An estIMate of lOCaL NEUraL Activity, the 16 elEctrodes werE Re-rEferenCeD by SUbtracTing aDjACenT signals givIng 15 cHannels whIch we pARametriSE as $c \in [1,15]$. LIne noiSe wAs rEmovED fRoM thE rECorDInGs, fOLloWed by linEaR dE-trenDing AND REmovIng The mEan. ThE resulting datA is A fluCTuaTing vOltagE sigNaL, whicH is timE-binnEd (1Ms bins) and binariSed bY splittinG ovEr The MeDian, lEAding tO a tIme Series, sEe Fig. \[fiG:WorKfLOW\](B).

FOr each of the 13 flies in OuR DAtA set, we haVe 30 time SErIeS Of length $n = 18,000$. THey CorrESPond tO the 15 CHaNnels, labElled nUMeRiCally frOm The cenTrAl tO peRipheRAl reGion as Depicted In Fig. \[FIg:workflow\](a), and THe two states of COnSCIoUS aroUsaL. Using the CSsR alGOritHm [@CSsr2], wE coNStrucT [$\epsiLoN\TeXT{-machines}$]{} for each of tHeSe time SerieS as a function oF maximum meMORY length wIthiN ThE Range $\lambda \in [2,11]$. THis is Below the meMOry lengtH $L(N) \siM 14$ beyond wHich we wouLD Be unable To rEliAblY deTERmIne transition PRObabIlIties foR a sEquence Of lEngTh $N$ (See seC. \[sec:Bkg-csSr\]) [^2]. We recoRd ThE rEsUltIng $3,900$ [$\epSIlon\text{-MaChiNe}$]{} StrUcturES and thEir coRresPoNdINg sTatistiCAl COMpleXiTiEs, anD grOuP them AccoRDinG to theiR respectiVe lEVel oF cOnScious aRousal, $\psi$, chanNeL location, $c$, AnD maXimum mEMOry lengtH, $\lambda$. Thus, statistical cOMplexitY $C_{\mU}$ is a fUnctIon of the sEt oF paramEteRS $\{\psi,c,\lAmbda\}$ fOr eacH fLy, $f$. wE Are prINCiPalLy Interested IN The DiffeReNce iN statisTical complexity oveR StaTes of consciouS arOusaL $$\BEgIn{gAThERed}
\deLTa C_{\MU} = c_{\mu}^{\text{wake}} - C_{\mu}^{\tExt{ana
 LFPs at each electrode we re recorde d for  18 s w hi le t he f ly was awake a n d 18 s more after the fly w as an ae s thet i se d (is ofluran e ,0 . 6%by  v olu me ,  t hroug h a n evapo rator). Fl ies ’unresponsive n es s during a nae sthesia wascon firmed  b y t h e abs enc e ofbehavi o ural r esponsesto a seri e s of ai r pu ffs,  and recovery was al s o confirmed af ter is of l ur a n e g aswas turned  o ff [@ C ohenEne u ro 2 0 1 6]. 
We used data  sampled at 1kH z forth e a n alysis  [@Co he n Ene uro2016], a nd t o obtainan est i mate of local n euralact ivi ty,t he  1 6 e le c tro d es  we r e r e-refere nc ed  by s ubtr a c t i ng a dja cent  sign als giving 15  ch anne l s w hichwe pa rame tr ise a s $c \ in [1 ,1 5]$. Line noise  was  removedfro mthe  r ecord i ngs, f oll owe d by li near de - tre nd i n g  a nd removing the me an . Th e result ing da t ais a fluctu at ing  vol t a ge si gnal ,  w hich istime-b i nn ed  (1ms b in s) and  b ina ris ed by spli ttingover the  medi a n, leading toa  time series, se e Fi g . \[ fig :workflow\] (b). 
For  eac h  o f t h e 13flies  i n  o u r data set, we have  3 0 time  seri es of length$N = 18,00 0 $ .  They co rres p on d  to the 15 cha nnels , labelled numerica lly f rom thecentral t o peripher alreg ion  as d ep icted in Fig. \ [fig :w orkflow \]( a), and  th e t wosta te s of cons cious ar ou sa l.  U sin g the CSSR alg or ith m[@C SSR2] ,  we co nstru ct [ $\ ep s ilo n\text{ - ma c h ines }$ ]{ } fo r e ac h ofthes e  ti me seri es as a f unc t ionof  m aximummemory length  w ithin thera nge  $\lam b d a \in [2 ,11]$. This is below th e  memory  le ngth$L(N ) \sim 14 $ b eyondwhi c h we w ould b e una bl e t o relia b l ydet er mine trans i t ion  prob ab ilit ies for  a sequence of len g th$N$ (see Sec.  \[ sec: B k g- css r \] )  [^ 2] .  We r ecord the resul ting $3,90 0$ [$ \epsilon\t e xt{ -m achine} $]{} st ructu r es andtheir cor respondin gstat i s tic al complex ities, a nd groupt hem a c co rding  to  their  r esp ectiv e leve l  of  cons ciousar ousal,  $\ps i$ , channe l location, $c$, and ma ximummemor y l ength, $\ lam b da$ . Thus, s tati stical com ple xit y $C_ {\m u }$ is  a f u nc tio n  of t he s e t of para m et ers $ \{ \psi,c,\lam b d a \}$  foreac h  fly,$f$.  We are principal l y interested i n th e dif fer e ncein  statistical c omp le x i ty overst ates of con scious a ro u sal $ $\begi n{gath ered}
\ D e lt a  C_{\m u} =  C_ {\mu}^{\t ext {w a ke}} -C_ {\ m u}^{\t ext{ an a
 LFPs_at each_electrode were recorded for_18s while_the_fly was_awake_and 18s more_after the fly_was anaesthetised (isoflurane, 0.6%_by volume, through_an_evaporator). Flies’ unresponsiveness during anaesthesia was confirmed by the absence of behavioural responses to_a_series of_air_puffs,_and recovery was also confirmed_after isoflurane gas was turned_off [@CohenEneuro2016].

We used_data sampled at 1kHz for the analysis [@CohenEneuro2016], and_to_obtain an estimate_of local neural activity, the 16 electrodes were re-referenced_by subtracting adjacent signals giving 15_channels which we_parametrise_as_$c \in [1,15]$. Line_noise was removed from the recordings,_followed by linear de-trending and removing_the mean. The resulting data is a_fluctuating voltage signal, which is time-binned_(1ms bins) and binarised by_splitting over_the median, leading to a_time series, see_Fig. \[fig:workflow\](b).

For each_of the 13_flies in our data set, we_have 30 time_series of length $N = 18,000$._They_correspond to the_15_channels,_labelled numerically_from the central_to_peripheral region_as_depicted in Fig. \[fig:workflow\](a), and the two_states_of conscious arousal. Using the CSSR algorithm [@CSSR2],_we construct [$\epsilon\text{-machines}$]{} for_each_of these time series_as a function of maximum_memory length within the range $\lambda_\in [2,11]$._This is_below the memory length $L(N) \sim 14$ beyond which we would_be unable to reliably determine transition_probabilities for a sequence_of length_$N$_(see Sec. \[sec:Bkg-cssr\]) [^2]. We_record_the resulting_$3,900$ [$\epsilon\text{-machine}$]{} structures and their corresponding statistical_complexities, and_group them according to their respective_level of conscious arousal,_$\psi$,_channel location, $c$, and maximum memory_length, $\lambda$. Thus, statistical complexity $C_{\mu}$_is a function of the_set_of_parameters $\{\psi,c,\lambda\}$ for each fly,_$f$. We are principally interested in_the difference in_statistical complexity over states of conscious arousal_$$\begin{gathered}
\Delta_C_{\mu} = C_{\mu}^{\text{wake}} - C_{\mu}^{\text{ana