_{\gamma,Break} \approx 26 \, (\tau / 13 \, {\rm kyr})^{-2} (B/10 \, \mu {\rm G})^{-3} \, {\rm eV}
\eqno (5)$$ This break is apparent in the models plotted in Figures 3 (break at $\sim 50$ eV) and 4 (break at $\sim$ 30 eV).

The break location is also of key importance to IC modeling of the H.E.S.S. detection. Electrons upscatter blackbody photons (at temperature $T$) to a mean energy of: $$E_{\gamma} \approx 2.2 \, (E_e/10 \, {\rm TeV})^{2}  \, (T/ 25 \, {\rm K}) \, \, {\rm TeV}
\eqno (6)$$ where we scale $T$ to the value adopted for the far IR field. HESS J1420–607 appears to peak in flux at $\approx 0.5-2.5$ TeV; we expect this peak to result from a cooling break rather than an exponential cutoff in the electron spectrum due to the need for significant numbers of VHE electrons to synchrotron radiate in the X-ray regime. Inserting the value of $E_{\gamma} = 0.5-2.5$ TeV into Equation 6 we see that at the break: $$E_{e,Break} \approx (5-11) \, (T/25 \, {\rm K})^{-1/2} \, \, {\rm TeV} 
\eqno (7)$$ This VHE break is primarily due to synchrotron cooling, so substituting Equation 7 into Equation 3 yields an estimate for the mean magnetic field strength in the nebula: $$B \approx (8-11) \, (T/25 \, {\rm K})^{-1/4} \, (\tau/ 13 \, {\rm kyr})^{-1/2} \, \, \mu {\rm G} %6.95-10.2
\eqno (8)$$ While this range of magnetic field (which ignores IC cooling) should not be taken too seriously, the fact that the 8 $\mu$G field we selected for single component modeling also matches the X-ray data lends some credence to this estimate.

Comparing the merits of each model, we find that the leptonic model provides a slightly better fit to the data, without the cost of the additional spectral components of the hybrid model. In addition, in order for pion
_ { \gamma, Break } \approx 26 \, (\tau / 13 \, { \rm kyr})^{-2 } (B/10 \, \mu { \rm G})^{-3 } \, { \rm eV } 
 \eqno (5)$$ This break is apparent in the models plotted in Figures 3 (break at $ \sim 50 $ eV) and 4 (demote at $ \sim$ 30 eV). 

 The break location is besides of key importance to intelligence community modeling of the H.E.S.S. detection. electron upscatter blackbody photons (at temperature $ T$) to a mean department of energy of: $ $ E_{\gamma } \approx 2.2 \, (E_e/10 \, { \rm TeV})^{2 }   \, (T/ 25 \, { \rm K }) \, \, { \rm TeV } 
 \eqno (6)$$ where we scale $ T$ to the value assume for the far IR field. HESS J1420–607 appear to peak in flux at $ \approx 0.5 - 2.5 $ TeV; we have a bun in the oven this point to result from a cool break rather than an exponential shortcut in the electron spectrum due to the need for significant numbers of VHE electron to synchrotron radiate in the X - ray regime. Inserting the value of $ E_{\gamma } = 0.5 - 2.5 $ TeV into Equation 6 we see that at the interruption: $ $ E_{e, Break } \approx (5 - 11) \, (T/25 \, { \rm K})^{-1/2 } \, \, { \rm TeV } 
 \eqno (7)$$ This VHE break is primarily due to synchrotron cooling, so substituting Equation 7 into Equation 3 give way an estimate for the mean magnetic field strength in the nebula: $ $ bel \approx (8 - 11) \, (T/25 \, { \rm K})^{-1/4 } \, (\tau/ 13 \, { \rm kyr})^{-1/2 } \, \, \mu { \rm G }% 6.95 - 10.2 
 \eqno (8)$$ While this stove of magnetic field (which ignores IC cooling) should not be taken too seriously, the fact that the 8 $ \mu$G battlefield we selected for single part mold besides matches the X - ray data lends some credence to this estimate. 

 Comparing the merit of each model, we find that the leptonic model provides a slightly better fit to the datum, without the cost of the additional spectral components of the hybrid model. In addition, in order for pion
_{\gamla,Break} \approx 26 \, (\tau / 13 \, {\vm kyr})^{-2} (B/10 \, \mu {\rm Y})^{-3} \, {\rm eT}
\eqno (5)$$ Fhis brexk is apparent in the models poottee in Figures 3 (break at $\sim 50$ eV) wnd 4 (breqk au $\sim$ 30 eV).

The break location is zpso mh key importancg to IC modening of the H.E.V.S. dztection. Electrons upscatter blackboqy photpnd (at temperatute $T$) uo w mezn energy of: $$E_{\gamma} \approx 2.2 \, (E_e/10 \, {\rj TeV})^{2}  \, (T/ 25 \, {\rm K}) \, \, {\rk TeV}
\eqno (6)$$ where we scale $H$ to the value adopted for the fat IR dield. HESS J1420–607 appears to peak in flox at $\approx 0.5-2.5$ TeV; we expect this peak to result feom d cooling bceak rwther than ak exponantial vutoff in the clectcon wpectrum due to the nxed for significant gumbers ox RHE electrons to syncyritron radhate un ghe X-cay regimf. Iiserting ths value of $W_{\gamma} = 0.5-2.5$ TeV into Eauwnoon 6 we see fhat ae ehe break: $$E_{e,Break} \approx (5-11) \, (T/25 \, {\rm K})^{-1/2} \, \, {\rm TeB} 
\eqno (7)$$ This VHE break us primarily due to sinchrotron cooling, so substituting Equation 7 into Equation 3 yielvs an efgumwte for the mean magnetic field strength in trs menula: $$B \approx (8-11) \, (B/25 \, {\rm K})^{-1/4} \, (\tau/ 13 \, {\rm lyg})^{-1/2} \, \, \mu {\rm G} %6.95-10.2
\eqno (8)$$ Whilz tgis range of magnehic fiejd (whuch ignorts IC cooling) should not be takeb too serioufoy, the fact that tke 8 $\mu$G fielb we sglectec for single component oodeming also mwtches ths X-ray data lends soke credenct to this estimate.

Somparing the merits of gach moqel, we finf thab the leptonic modep prorides a slightlj better fit to the data, withouv the cost of tve ddditioncl spegtral componentf of the hybrib model. Nn addktion, in ogder for 'ion
_{\gamma,Break} \approx 26 \, (\tau / 13 kyr})^{-2} \, \mu G})^{-3} \, {\rm is in the models in Figures 3 at $\sim 50$ eV) and 4 at $\sim$ 30 eV). The break location is also of key importance to modeling of the H.E.S.S. detection. Electrons upscatter blackbody photons (at temperature $T$) to mean of: \approx \, (E_e/10 \, {\rm TeV})^{2} \, (T/ 25 \, {\rm K}) \, \, {\rm TeV} \eqno where we scale $T$ to the value adopted the far IR field. J1420–607 appears to peak in at 0.5-2.5$ TeV; expect peak result from a break rather than an exponential cutoff in the electron spectrum due to the need for significant numbers VHE electrons radiate in X-ray Inserting value of $E_{\gamma} TeV into Equation 6 we see break: $$E_{e,Break} \approx (5-11) \, (T/25 \, {\rm \, \, TeV} \eqno (7)$$ This VHE break primarily due to synchrotron cooling, so substituting Equation into Equation 3 yields an estimate for the mean magnetic field strength in the nebula: (8-11) \, (T/25 \, K})^{-1/4} \, (\tau/ \, kyr})^{-1/2} \, {\rm G} \eqno (8)$$ While this range of magnetic field (which ignores IC should not be taken too seriously, the fact that the field selected for single modeling also matches the data some credence to this the of find the model provides a slightly fit to the data, without cost of the additional model. In addition, in order for pion
_{\gamma,Break} \approx 26 \, (\tau / 13 \, {\rm kyr})^{-2} (B/10 \, \Mu {\rm G})^{-3} \, {\rm eV}
\eQno (5)$$ ThIs bReaK iS appArenT in the models plOTted In Figures 3 (break at $\sim 50$ eV) aNd 4 (breAk AT $\sim$ 30 Ev).

THe breAk locatIOn IS AlsO oF kEy iMpORtAnce tO IC ModelinG of the H.E.S.S. DetEcTion. ElectronS UpScatter blaCkbOdy photons (at TemPeratuRe $t$) to A Mean eNerGy of: $$E_{\Gamma} \aPProx 2.2 \, (E_e/10 \, {\Rm TeV})^{2}  \, (T/ 25 \, {\rm K}) \, \, {\Rm tEV}
\eqno (6)$$ WHere we sCALe $t$ to tHe value adopted for THe FAr IR field. HESS J1420–607 AppearS tO PeAK In fLux At $\approx 0.5-2.5$ Tev; wE expeCT this peAK tO RESulT From a cooling bReak rather tHAn aN exponEnTiaL Cutoff In the ElECtrOn spectrum dUe to The need foR signiFIcant nuMBers of VhE elecTroNs tO synCHrOtRon RaDIatE In The x-Ray Regime. InSeRtIng thE valUE OF $e_{\gamMa} = 0.5-2.5$ TEV inTo EquAtion 6 we see thaT at The bREak: $$e_{e,BreAk} \appRox (5-11) \, (T/25 \, {\Rm k})^{-1/2} \, \, {\rm Tev} 
\eqno (7)$$ THis VHe bReak is primarily Due tO synchrotRon CoOliNg, So subSTitutiNg EQuaTion 7 intO EquatiON 3 yiElDS AN eStimate for the mean mAgNETiC field stRength IN tHe NEbula: $$B \apPrOx (8-11) \, (T/25 \, {\Rm K})^{-1/4} \, (\tAU/ 13 \, {\Rm kyr})^{-1/2} \, \, \Mu {\rm g} %6.95-10.2
\EqNo (8)$$ While tHis ranGE oF mAgnetic FiEld (whiCh IgnOreS IC coOLing) Should Not be takEn too SEriously, the facT That the 8 $\mu$G fieLD wE SElECted For Single compoNent MOdelIng aLSo MatCHes thE X-ray DaTA lENds some credence to thIs EstimaTe.

ComParing the meriTs of each moDEL, We find thAt thE LePTonic model provIdes a Slightly beTTer fit to The daTa, withouT the cost oF THe additiOnaL spEctRal COMpOnents of the hyBRId moDeL. In addiTioN, in ordeR foR piOn
_{\gamma,Break} \approx 26  \, (\tau/ 13\,{\r mkyr} )^{- 2} (B/10 \, \m u  {\r m G})^{-3} \, {\rm eV} 
\eqn o( 5)$$ Th is br eak isa pp a r ent  i nthe  m o de ls pl ott ed in F igures 3 ( bre ak  at $\sim 50 $  e V) and 4 ( bre ak at $\sim$  30  eV).
T heb reakloc ation  is al s o of k ey import an c e to I C  modeli n g  o f th e H.E.S.S. detect i on .  Electrons ups catter  b l ac k b ody  ph otons (atte mpera t ure $T$ )  t o a  me a n energy of:$$E_{\gamma }  \a pprox2. 2 \ ,  (E_e/ 10 \,  { \ rmTeV})^{2} \, ( T/ 25 \,{\rm K } ) \, \, {\rm Te V}
\eq no(6) $$ w h er ewesc a le$ T$  to the  value a do pt ed fo r th e f a r IR  fi eld.  HESS  J1420–607 ap pea rs t o  pe ak in  flux  at$\ appro x 0.5- 2.5$Te V; we expect th is p eak to re sul tfro ma coo l ing br eak  ra ther th an an e x pon en t i a lcutoff in the elec tr o n  s pectrumdue to th en eed forsi gni fica n t  numb erso fVHE elec tronst osy nchrotr on  radia te  in  th e X-r a y re gime.Insertin g the value of $E_{\ g amma} = 0.5-2 . 5$ T eV into  Eq uation 6 we  see that  att he  br e ak: $ $E_{e ,B r ea k } \approx (5-11) \,  ( T/25 \ , {\r m K})^{-1/2}\, \, {\rm T e V} 
\eqn o (7 ) $$ This VHE break  is p rimarily d u e to syn chrot ron cool ing, so s u b stitutin g E qua tio n 7 i nt o Equation 3y i elds  a n estim ate  for th e m ean  ma gne ti c field s trengthin  t he  n ebu la: $ $ B \appro x(8- 11 ) \ , (T/ 2 5 \, { \rm K })^{ -1 /4 }  \,  (\tau/ 13 \ , {\ rm  k yr}) ^{- 1/ 2} \,  \,\ mu{\rm G}  %6.95-10 .2\ eqno  ( 8) $$ Whil e this rangeof  magneticfi eld  (whic h ignoresIC cooling) should notb e taken  to o ser ious ly, the f act  thatthe 8 $\mu $G fie ld we  s ele c t ed fo r si ngl ecomponentm o del ing a ls o ma tches t he X-ray data lend s  so me credence t o t hise s ti mat e .Com pa r ing t he merits of ea ch model,we fi nd that th e  le pt onic mo del pro vides a sligh tly bette r fit toth e da t a , w ithout the  cost of  the addi t ional sp ectra l c ompone nt s o f the  hybri d  mo del.In add it ion, i n ord er  for pio n
_{\gamma,Break} \approx_26 \,_(\tau / 13 \,_{\rm kyr})^{-2}_(B/10_\, \mu_{\rm_G})^{-3} \, {\rm_eV}
\eqno (5)$$ This_break is apparent in_the models plotted_in_Figures 3 (break at $\sim 50$ eV) and 4 (break at $\sim$ 30 eV).

The_break_location is_also_of_key importance to IC modeling_of the H.E.S.S. detection. Electrons_upscatter blackbody_photons (at temperature $T$) to a mean energy_of:_$$E_{\gamma} \approx 2.2_\, (E_e/10 \, {\rm TeV})^{2}  \, (T/ 25_\, {\rm K}) \, \, {\rm_TeV}
\eqno (6)$$ where_we_scale_$T$ to the value_adopted for the far IR field._HESS J1420–607 appears to peak in_flux at $\approx 0.5-2.5$ TeV; we expect_this peak to result from a_cooling break rather than an_exponential cutoff_in the electron spectrum due_to the need_for significant_numbers of VHE_electrons to synchrotron radiate in the_X-ray regime. Inserting_the value of $E_{\gamma} = 0.5-2.5$_TeV_into Equation 6_we_see_that at_the break: $$E_{e,Break}_\approx_(5-11) \,_(T/25_\, {\rm K})^{-1/2} \, \, {\rm_TeV}_
\eqno (7)$$ This VHE break is primarily_due to synchrotron cooling,_so_substituting Equation 7 into_Equation 3 yields an estimate_for the mean magnetic field strength_in the_nebula: $$B_\approx (8-11) \, (T/25 \, {\rm K})^{-1/4} \, (\tau/ 13 \,_{\rm kyr})^{-1/2} \, \, \mu {\rm_G} %6.95-10.2
\eqno (8)$$ While_this range_of_magnetic field (which_ignores_IC cooling)_should not be taken too seriously, the_fact that_the 8 $\mu$G field we selected_for single component modeling_also_matches the X-ray data lends some_credence to this estimate.

Comparing the merits_of each model, we find_that_the_leptonic model provides a slightly_better fit to the data, without_the cost of_the additional spectral components of the hybrid_model._In addition, in order for pion