 that used in our earlier works [@HN; @AdP]. This adjustment has been made in order to conform with the convention established in [@BHN]. Various formulas below correct some other sign errors in [@HN; @AdP] for which *errata* are in preparation.) Although our model makes sense for all values of the parameters, there are certain inequalities that identify what can be regarded as the *physical* range. For *least action* one should have *positive* “kinetic energy”, hence the terms with quadratic time derivatives should have positive coefficients, which yields the requirements $$a_2<0,\quad w_2+w_3>0, \quad w_4+w_6<0, \quad 4 (w_2+w_3)(w_4+w_6)+(\mu_3-\mu_2)^2<0.$$

In the following, for simplicity, we often take units such that $\kappa=1=\varrho$. In the final results these factors can be easily restored by multiplying $\{a_0,a_2,a_3,b_0,\Lambda,\sigma_2\}$ by $\kappa^{-1}$ and $\{w_2,w_3,w_4,w_6,\mu_2,\mu_3\}$ by $\varrho^{-1}$.

Useful combinations
-------------------

In the general effective Lagrangian (\[generalL\]), by using the fact that $\tilde R^2,\ \tilde X^2,\ \tilde X\tilde R$ differ from $R^2,\ X^2,\ XR$ only by having opposite sign cross terms, the quadratic curvature terms can be re-expressed as follows: $$\begin{aligned}
&&-\frac1{24}[-w_2\tilde X^2-w_3X^2+w_4\tilde R^2+w_6R^2-\mu_2\tilde X\tilde R+\mu_3RX]a^3\nonumber\\
&&\qquad\equiv-\frac1{24}[-w_{3+2}X^2+w_{6+4}R^2+\mu_{3-2}RX]a^3 \nonumber\\
&&\qquad\qquad-\frac1{24}[-w_2(\tilde X^2-X^2)+w_4(\tilde R^2-R^2)-\mu_2(\tilde
that used in our earlier works   [ @HN; @AdP ]. This adjustment has been make in decree to conform with the convention established in   [ @BHN ]. respective formulas below correct some early sign errors in   [ @HN; @AdP ] for which * errata * are in formulation .) Although our model makes common sense for all values of the parameters, there are certain inequality that identify what can be regarded as the * forcible * range. For * least legal action * one should suffer * positive * “ kinetic energy ”, therefore the terms with quadratic time derived function should have convinced coefficients, which yields the requirements $ $ a_2<0,\quad w_2+w_3>0, \quad w_4+w_6<0, \quad 4 (w_2+w_3)(w_4+w_6)+(\mu_3-\mu_2)^2<0.$$ 

 In the following, for simplicity, we frequently take units such that $ \kappa=1=\varrho$. In the final results these factors can be easily restored by multiplying $ \{a_0,a_2,a_3,b_0,\Lambda,\sigma_2\}$ by $ \kappa^{-1}$ and $ \{w_2,w_3,w_4,w_6,\mu_2,\mu_3\}$ by $ \varrho^{-1}$. 

 Useful combinations 
 ------------------- 

 In the general effective Lagrangian   (\[generalL\ ]), by using the fact that $ \tilde R^2,\ \tilde X^2,\ \tilde X\tilde R$ differ from $ R^2,\ X^2,\ XR$ only by having opposite sign crisscross terms, the quadratic curvature terms can be re - express as follows: $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 & & -\frac1{24}[-w_2\tilde X^2 - w_3X^2+w_4\tilde R^2+w_6R^2-\mu_2\tilde X\tilde R+\mu_3RX]a^3\nonumber\\ 
 & & \qquad\equiv-\frac1{24}[-w_{3 + 2}X^2+w_{6 + 4}R^2+\mu_{3 - 2}RX]a^3 \nonumber\\ 
 & & \qquad\qquad-\frac1{24}[-w_2(\tilde X^2 - X^2)+w_4(\tilde R^2 - R^2)-\mu_2(\tilde
 thwt used in our earlier wurks [@HN; @AdP]. This adjustkent hzs been oade in order to conform witi thw concention established in [@CHN]. Variols formulqs btlow correct some other slyn erdlrs nn [@IN; @AdP] for whicm *errata* ara in preparatimn.) Apthough our model makes sense for ajl valurs of the paramejers, uhewe adv gertain inequalities that identiry what can be regarced as the *physical* range. Vor *peast action* one sjould have *kksieuve* “kinetic dnergy”, henbz the terms with quadratic time derivativer shobld have powirivf coefficienvs, whibh yields the requirekents $$a_2<0,\auad w_2+w_3>0, \quad w_4+e_6<0, \qnad 4 (w_2+w_3)(w_4+w_6)+(\mu_3-\mu_2)^2<0.$$

In the folloxing, for simplicity, re often daie units such thar $\jappa=1=\earrvo$. Iv thd fjnel desultd tiese factora can be eawily restored by muktyikying $\{a_0,a_2,a_3,b_0,\Lajbda,\sidmw_2\}$ by $\kappa^{-1}$ and $\{w_2,w_3,w_4,w_6,\mu_2,\mu_3\}$ by $\varrho^{-1}$.

Useful cojbinations
-------------------

In the generao effective Lagrangiaj (\[generalL\]), by using the fact that $\tilde R^2,\ \tilde X^2,\ \tilde X\tinde R$ aifycv frun $G^2,\ X^2,\ XR$ only by having opposite sign cross teria, uhe quadratic curyature terms can br ge-rvpressed as fullows: $$\befin{aligned}
&&-\frac1{24}[-w_2\tilfe X^2-w_3X^2+w_4\jilde E^2+w_6R^2-\mu_2\tildt X\tikde R+\mu_3RX]a^3\nonumber\\
&&\qquad\equic-\frac1{24}[-w_{3+2}X^2+w_{6+4}R^2+\mu_{3-2}RQ]a^3 \ninumber\\
&&\qquad\qquad-\fxac1{24}[-w_2(\tilde X^2-X^2)+c_4(\tilde R^2-R^2)-\mu_2(\yilde
that used in our earlier works [@HN; adjustment been made order to conform [@BHN]. formulas below correct other sign errors [@HN; @AdP] for which *errata* are preparation.) Although our model makes sense for all values of the parameters, there certain inequalities that identify what can be regarded as the *physical* range. For action* should *positive* energy”, hence the terms with quadratic time derivatives should have positive coefficients, which yields the requirements w_2+w_3>0, \quad w_4+w_6<0, \quad 4 (w_2+w_3)(w_4+w_6)+(\mu_3-\mu_2)^2<0.$$ In the for simplicity, we often units such that $\kappa=1=\varrho$. In final these factors be restored multiplying $\{a_0,a_2,a_3,b_0,\Lambda,\sigma_2\}$ by and $\{w_2,w_3,w_4,w_6,\mu_2,\mu_3\}$ by $\varrho^{-1}$. Useful combinations ------------------- In the general effective Lagrangian (\[generalL\]), by using the fact $\tilde R^2,\ \tilde X\tilde differ $R^2,\ XR$ only by sign cross terms, the quadratic curvature re-expressed as follows: $$\begin{aligned} &&-\frac1{24}[-w_2\tilde X^2-w_3X^2+w_4\tilde R^2+w_6R^2-\mu_2\tilde X\tilde &&\qquad\equiv-\frac1{24}[-w_{3+2}X^2+w_{6+4}R^2+\mu_{3-2}RX]a^3 \nonumber\\ X^2-X^2)+w_4(\tilde R^2-R^2)-\mu_2(\tilde
 that used in our earlier works [@hN; @AdP]. This aDjustMenT haS bEen mAde iN order to conforM With The convention establishEd in [@BhN]. vArioUS fOrmulAs below COrRECt sOmE oTheR sIGn ErrorS in [@hN; @AdP] foR which *erraTa* aRe In preparatioN.) alThough our mOdeL makes sense fOr aLl valuEs Of tHE paraMetErs, thEre are CErtain InequalitIeS That idENtify whAT CaN be rEgarded as the *physiCAl* RAnge. For *least acTion* onE sHOuLD HavE *poSitive* “kineTiC enerGY”, hence tHE tERMS wiTH quadratic timE derivativeS ShoUld havE pOsiTIve coeFficiEnTS, whIch yields thE reqUirements $$A_2<0,\quad w_2+W_3>0, \Quad w_4+w_6<0, \qUAd 4 (w_2+w_3)(w_4+w_6)+(\mU_3-\mu_2)^2<0.$$

In tHe fOllOwinG, FoR sImpLiCIty, WE oFteN TakE units suCh ThAt $\kapPa=1=\vaRRHO$. in thE fiNal rEsultS these factors Can Be eaSIly RestoRed by MultIpLying $\{A_0,a_2,a_3,b_0,\LaMbda,\sIgMa_2\}$ by $\kappa^{-1}$ and $\{w_2,w_3,w_4,W_6,\mu_2,\mU_3\}$ by $\varrho^{-1}$.

useFuL coMbInatiONs
-------------------

In thE geNerAl effecTive LagRAngIaN (\[GENeRalL\]), by using the fact ThAT $\TiLde R^2,\ \tildE X^2,\ \tildE x\tIlDE R$ differ FrOm $R^2,\ x^2,\ XR$ oNLY by haVing OPpOsite sigN cross TErMs, The quadRaTic curVaTurE teRms caN Be re-ExpresSed as folLows: $$\bEGin{aligned}
&&-\frac1{24}[-W_2\Tilde X^2-w_3X^2+w_4\tildE r^2+w_6r^2-\MU_2\tILde X\TilDe R+\mu_3RX]a^3\nonUmbeR\\
&&\QquaD\equIV-\fRac1{24}[-W_{3+2}x^2+w_{6+4}R^2+\mu_{3-2}rX]a^3 \noNuMBeR\\
&&\Qquad\qquad-\frac1{24}[-w_2(\tildE X^2-x^2)+w_4(\tildE R^2-R^2)-\mu_2(\Tilde
 that used in our earlierworks [@HN ; @Ad P].  Th is  adj ustm ent has been m a de i n order to conform wit h the  c o nven t io n est ablishe d  i n [@B HN ].  Va ri o us  form ula s below  correct s ome  o ther sign er r or s in [@HN;  @A dP] for whic h * errata *are in pr epa ratio n.) Al t houghour model  m a kes se n se fora l lvalu es of the paramet e rs ,  there are cer tain i ne q ua l i tie s t hat identi fy  what can ber eg a r d eda s the *physic al* range.F or*least  a cti o n* one  shou ld hav e *positive * “k inetic en ergy”, hence t h e terms  withqua dra tict im eder iv a tiv e ssho u ldhave pos it iv e coe ffic i e n t s, w hic h yi eldsthe requireme nts  $$a _ 2<0 ,\qua d w_2 +w_3 >0 , \qu ad w_4 +w_6< 0,  \quad 4 (w_2+w _3)( w_4+w_6)+ (\m u_ 3-\ mu _2)^2 < 0.$$
Inthe  follow ing, fo r  si mp l i c it y, we often take u ni t s  s uch that  $\kap p a= 1= \ varrho$.  I n t he f i n al re sult s  t hese fac tors c a nbe  easily  r estore dbymul tiply i ng $ \{a_0, a_2,a_3, b_0,\ L ambda,\sigma_2 \ }$ by $\kappa ^ {- 1 } $a nd $ \{w _2,w_3,w_4, w_6, \ mu_2 ,\mu _ 3\ }$b y $\v arrho ^{ - 1} $ .

Useful combinati on s
---- ----- ----------

I n the gene r a l  effecti ve L a gr a ngian (\[gener alL\] ), by usin g  the fac t tha t $\tild e R^2,\ \ t i lde X^2, \ \ til deX\t i l de  R$ differ fr o m  $R^ 2, \ X^2,\  XR $ onlybyhav ing  op po site sign  cross t er ms ,th e q uadra t ic curva tu rete rms  canb e re-e xpres sedas  f o llo ws: $$\ b eg i n {ali gn ed }
&& -\f ra c1{24 }[-w _ 2\t ilde X^ 2-w_3X^2+ w_4 \ tild eR^ 2+w_6R^ 2-\mu_2\tilde  X \tilde R+\ mu _3R X]a^3\ n o number\\ 
&&\qquad\equiv-\frac1{ 2 4}[-w_{ 3+2 }X^2+ w_{6 +4}R^2+\m u_{ 3-2}RX ]a^ 3  \nonu mber\\ 
&&\q qu ad\ q q uad-\ f r ac 1{2 4} [-w_2(\til d e  X^ 2-X^2 )+ w_4( \tildeR^2-R^2)-\mu_2(\ti l de
 that_used in_our earlier works [@HN; @AdP]._This adjustment_has_been made_in_order to conform_with the convention_established in [@BHN]. Various formulas_below correct some_other_sign errors in [@HN; @AdP] for which *errata* are in preparation.) Although our model makes_sense_for all_values_of_the parameters, there are certain_inequalities that identify what can_be regarded_as the *physical* range. For *least action* one_should_have *positive* “kinetic_energy”, hence the terms with quadratic time derivatives should_have positive coefficients, which yields the_requirements $$a_2<0,\quad w_2+w_3>0,_\quad_w_4+w_6<0,_\quad 4 (w_2+w_3)(w_4+w_6)+(\mu_3-\mu_2)^2<0.$$

In the_following, for simplicity, we often take_units such that $\kappa=1=\varrho$. In the_final results these factors can be easily_restored by multiplying $\{a_0,a_2,a_3,b_0,\Lambda,\sigma_2\}$ by $\kappa^{-1}$_and $\{w_2,w_3,w_4,w_6,\mu_2,\mu_3\}$ by $\varrho^{-1}$.

Useful combinations
-------------------

In_the general_effective Lagrangian (\[generalL\]), by using the_fact that $\tilde_R^2,\ \tilde_X^2,\ \tilde X\tilde_R$ differ from $R^2,\ X^2,\ XR$_only by having_opposite sign cross terms, the quadratic_curvature_terms can be_re-expressed_as_follows: $$\begin{aligned}
&&-\frac1{24}[-w_2\tilde_X^2-w_3X^2+w_4\tilde R^2+w_6R^2-\mu_2\tilde X\tilde_R+\mu_3RX]a^3\nonumber\\
&&\qquad\equiv-\frac1{24}[-w_{3+2}X^2+w_{6+4}R^2+\mu_{3-2}RX]a^3_\nonumber\\
&&\qquad\qquad-\frac1{24}[-w_2(\tilde X^2-X^2)+w_4(\tilde_R^2-R^2)-\mu_2(\tilde