d_2$ least significant bits of the binary representation of $x$. We thus decompose the raw keys as $X=({\hat{X}},{\check{X}})$, where ${\hat{X}}$ and ${\check{X}}$ denote the sequence of the $d_2$ most and the $d_1$ least significant bits of each key symbol, respectively. The reconciliation module performs the following steps:

(iii-a) Based on the variance of her binned raw key and the samples $X_A^\text{pe}$ and $X_B^\text{pe}$, Alice determines $d_1$, $d_2$, and the code rate $R$ such that the expected leakage is minimized w.r.t. the entropy in Bob’s symbols, and transmits these parameters to Bob.

(iii-b) Then Alice communicates ${\check{X}}_A$ to Bob who reconciles ${\check{X}}_B$ simply by setting $ {\check{X}}_B:={\check{X}}_A $. Hence, the errors which are left in Bob’s key $X_B$ are reduced to the errors in ${\hat{X}}_B$. Non-binary LDPC reconciliation is used to correct ${\hat{X}}_B$ as described in the next step.

(iii-c) Both Alice and Bob split their ${\hat{X}}_A$ and ${\hat{X}}_B$ into blocks ${\hat{X}}_A^{(\ell)}$ and ${\hat{X}}_B^{(\ell)}$, $\ell=1,\dots, \frac{N-k}{n}$, each with $n=10^5$ elements of ${\hat{\chi}}$. For this step we identify $ {\hat{\chi}}$ with GF($2^{d_2}$), the Galois field with $2^{d_2}$ elements. For each block ${\hat{X}}_A^{(\ell)}$, Alice uses the parity check matrix $H$ of an LDPC code over GF($2^{d_2}$) and rate $R$ to calculate the syndrome $s^{(\ell)}:=H\cdot {\hat{X}}_A^{(\ell)}$. Alice sends the syndrome $s^{(\ell)}$ to Bob. For all elements $j \in GF(2^{d_2})$ and for all indices $i\in\{1,\dots,n\}$ in the block Bob calculates the conditional probability that $({\hat{X}}_A^{(\ell)})_i=j
d_2 $ least significant bits of the binary representation of $ x$. We thus disintegrate the crude keys as $ X=({\hat{X}},{\check{X}})$, where $ { \hat{X}}$ and $ { \check{X}}$ denote the succession of the $ d_2 $ most and the $ d_1 $ least significant snatch of each key symbol, respectively. The reconciliation module perform the following steps: 

 (iii - a) Based on the discrepancy of her binned raw keystone and the samples $ X_A^\text{pe}$ and $ X_B^\text{pe}$, Alice determines $ d_1 $, $ d_2 $, and the code pace $ R$ such that the expected leakage is minimized w.r.t.   the information in Bob ’s symbols, and transmits these parameter to Bob. 

 (iii - b) Then Alice communicates $ { \check{X}}_A$ to Bob who reconciles $ { \check{X}}_B$ plainly by setting $ { \check{X}}_B:={\check{X}}_A $. Hence, the errors which are leave in Bob ’s key $ X_B$ are reduced to the errors in $ { \hat{X}}_B$. Non - binary LDPC reconciliation is used to correct $ { \hat{X}}_B$ as trace in the next step. 

 (iii - c) Both Alice and Bob split their $ { \hat{X}}_A$ and $ { \hat{X}}_B$ into blocks $ { \hat{X}}_A^{(\ell)}$ and $ { \hat{X}}_B^{(\ell)}$, $ \ell=1,\dots, \frac{N - k}{n}$, each with $ n=10 ^ 5 $ elements of $ { \hat{\chi}}$. For this step we identify $ { \hat{\chi}}$ with GF($2^{d_2}$), the Galois field with $ 2^{d_2}$ elements. For each block $ { \hat{X}}_A^{(\ell)}$, Alice uses the parity check matrix $ H$ of an LDPC code over GF($2^{d_2}$) and rate $ R$ to calculate the syndrome $ s^{(\ell)}:=H\cdot { \hat{X}}_A^{(\ell)}$. Alice sends the syndrome $ s^{(\ell)}$ to Bob. For all elements $ joule \in GF(2^{d_2})$ and for all index $ i\in\{1,\dots, n\}$ in the block Bob account the conditional probability that $ ({ \hat{X}}_A^{(\ell)})_i = j
d_2$ lfast significant bits of the binary reptewentatmon of $s$. We thur decompose the raw keys as $E=({\hat{Z}},{\checj{X}})$, where ${\hat{X}}$ and ${\checy{X}}$ denote the seqyenct of the $d_2$ most ais the $d_1$ least dignnfmcant bits of esch key sykbol, respectivalh. Che reconciliation module performs tre follpwlng steps:

(iii-a) Fasec on fhe variance of her binned raw key and tht samples $X_A^\text{pe}$ and $X_B^\text{pe}$, Alice determlnes $d_1$, $d_2$, and the code gate $R$ such thae the expectea leakage pv minimizes w.r.t. the entropy in Bob’s symbolr, and transmits tyesf parameters to Bjb.

(iii-b) Then Alice cokmunicayes ${\check{X}}_A$ to Bou whi reconciles ${\check{X}}_B$ vimply by setting $ {\check{X}}_B:={\cveek{X}}_A $. Hence, the errorw qhich are lefg in Bog’s ksy $X_B$ wre reduced tk the errorw in ${\hat{X}}_B$. Non-binaru JEPC reconciliztion ys used to correct ${\hat{X}}_B$ as described in uhe nsxt step.

(iii-c) Both Alice and Bob split their ${\jat{X}}_A$ and ${\hat{X}}_B$ into blocks ${\hat{X}}_A^{(\ell)}$ and ${\hat{X}}_B^{(\ell)}$, $\ell=1,\dots, \xrac{N-i}{v}$, ecgm wigy $j=10^5$ elements of ${\hat{\chi}}$. For this step we identifr $ {\nan{\chi}}$ with GF($2^{d_2}$), the Galois fiekd wojh $2^{d_2}$ elements. Wor eaeg glock ${\hat{X}}_A^{(\ell)}$, Alife uses the parity chtck mstrix $H$ of an LDPC code ovee GF($2^{d_2}$) and rane $R$ to calculate the dyndrome $s^{(\eul)}:=H\ccot {\hst{X}}_A^{(\ell)}$. Alice sends the synsrome $s^{(\ell)}$ ho Bob. Fod all elements $j \kn NF(2^{d_2})$ and for all indices $i\in\{1,\does,n\}$ in thx bloek Bob cxlcukates ehe conditlonal probability that $({\hwt{X}}_A^{(\epl)})_h=j
d_2$ least significant bits of the binary $x$. thus decompose raw keys as denote sequence of the most and the least significant bits of each key respectively. The reconciliation module performs the following steps: (iii-a) Based on the variance her binned raw key and the samples $X_A^\text{pe}$ and $X_B^\text{pe}$, Alice determines $d_1$, and code $R$ that the expected leakage is minimized w.r.t. the entropy in Bob’s symbols, and transmits these parameters Bob. (iii-b) Then Alice communicates ${\check{X}}_A$ to Bob reconciles ${\check{X}}_B$ simply by $ {\check{X}}_B:={\check{X}}_A $. Hence, the which left in key are to the errors ${\hat{X}}_B$. Non-binary LDPC reconciliation is used to correct ${\hat{X}}_B$ as described in the next step. (iii-c) Both and Bob ${\hat{X}}_A$ and into ${\hat{X}}_A^{(\ell)}$ ${\hat{X}}_B^{(\ell)}$, $\ell=1,\dots, \frac{N-k}{n}$, $n=10^5$ elements of ${\hat{\chi}}$. For this $ {\hat{\chi}}$ with GF($2^{d_2}$), the Galois field with elements. For block ${\hat{X}}_A^{(\ell)}$, Alice uses the parity matrix $H$ of an LDPC code over GF($2^{d_2}$) rate $R$ to calculate the syndrome $s^{(\ell)}:=H\cdot {\hat{X}}_A^{(\ell)}$. Alice sends the syndrome $s^{(\ell)}$ to Bob. elements $j \in GF(2^{d_2})$ for all indices in block calculates conditional probability $({\hat{X}}_A^{(\ell)})_i=j
d_2$ least significant bits of thE binary repResenTatIon Of $X$. We tHus dEcompose the raw KEys aS $X=({\hat{X}},{\check{X}})$, where ${\hat{X}}$ aNd ${\cheCk{x}}$ DenoTE tHe seqUence of THe $D_2$ MOst AnD tHe $d_1$ LeASt SigniFicAnt bits Of each key sYmbOl, Respectively. tHe ReconciliaTioN module perfoRms The folLoWinG Steps:

(Iii-A) BaseD on the VAriancE of her binNeD Raw key ANd the saMPLeS $X_A^\tExt{pe}$ and $X_B^\text{pe}$, ALIcE Determines $d_1$, $d_2$, anD the coDe RAtE $r$ SucH thAt the expecTeD leakAGe is minIMiZED W.r.t. THe entropy in BoB’s symbols, anD TraNsmits ThEse PArametErs to boB.

(Iii-B) Then Alice cOmmuNicates ${\chEck{X}}_A$ tO bob who rEConcileS ${\check{x}}_B$ sImpLy by SEtTiNg $ {\cHeCK{X}}_B:={\CHeCk{X}}_a $. henCe, the errOrS wHich aRe leFT IN bob’s Key $x_B$ arE reduCed to the errorS in ${\Hat{X}}_b$. non-BinarY LDPC RecoNcIliatIon is uSed to CoRrect ${\hat{X}}_B$ as desCribEd in the neXt sTeP.

(iiI-c) both ALIce and bob SplIt their ${\Hat{X}}_A$ anD ${\Hat{x}}_B$ INTO bLocks ${\hat{X}}_A^{(\ell)}$ and ${\haT{X}}_b^{(\ELl)}$, $\Ell=1,\dots, \fRac{N-k}{n}$, EAcH wITh $n=10^5$ elemeNtS of ${\Hat{\cHI}}$. for thIs stEP wE identifY $ {\hat{\chI}}$ WiTh gF($2^{d_2}$), the GAlOis fieLd WitH $2^{d_2}$ eLemenTS. For Each blOck ${\hat{X}}_A^{(\Ell)}$, AlICe uses the paritY Check matrix $H$ oF An ldpC COde oVer gF($2^{d_2}$) and rate $R$ To caLCulaTe thE SyNdrOMe $s^{(\elL)}:=H\cdoT {\hAT{X}}_a^{(\Ell)}$. Alice sends the synDrOme $s^{(\elL)}$ to BoB. For all elemenTs $j \in GF(2^{d_2})$ anD FOR all indiCes $i\IN\{1,\dOTs,n\}$ in the block BOb calCulates the COnditionAl proBability That $({\hat{X}}_A^{(\ELL)})_i=j
d_2$ least significant bit s of the b inary  re pre se ntat ionof $x$. We thu s  dec ompose the raw keys as  $X=( {\ h at{X } }, {\che ck{X}}) $ ,w h ere  $ {\ hat {X } }$  and${\ check{X }}$ denote  th esequence oft he  $d_2$ mos t a nd the $d_1$  le ast si gn ifi c ant b its  of e ach ke y  symbo l, respec ti v ely. T h e recon c i li atio n module performs th e  following ste ps:

( ii i -a ) Bas edon the var ia nce o f  her bi n ne d r awk ey and the sa mples $X_A^ \ tex t{pe}$  a nd$ X_B^\t ext{p e} $ , A lice determ ines  $d_1$, $ d_2$,a nd thec ode rat e $R$suc h t hatt he  e xpe ct e d l e ak age isminimize dw. r.t.thee n t r opyinBob’ s sym bols, and tra nsm itst hes e par amete rs t oBob.
(iii- b) Th en  Alice communic ates  ${\check {X} }_ A$to  Bobw ho rec onc ile s ${\ch eck{X}} _ B$si m p l yby setting $ {\che ck { X }} _B:={\ch eck{X} } _A  $ .  Hence,th e e rror s which  are le ft in Bo b’s ke y  $ X_ B$ arere ducedto  th e e rrors in $ {\hat{ X}}_B$.Non-b i nary LDPC reco n ciliation isu se d to corr ect  ${\hat{X}} _B$a s de scri b ed  in the n ext s te p .(iii-c) Both Alicean d Bobsplit  their ${\hat {X}}_A$ an d $ {\hat{X} }_B$ in t o blocks ${\ha t{X}} _A^{(\ell) } $ and ${ \hat{ X}}_B^{( \ell)}$,$ \ ell=1,\d ots , \ fra c{N - k }{ n}$, each wit h $n=1 0^ 5$ elem ent s of ${ \ha t{\ chi }}$ .For thisstep weid en ti fy  ${\hat { \chi}}$wi thGF ($2 ^{d_2 } $), th e Gal oisfi el d  wi th $2^{ d _2 } $  ele me nt s. F orea ch bl ock$ {\h at{X}}_ A^{(\ell) }$, Alic eus es theparity checkma trix $H$ o fanLDPC c o d e over G F($2^{d_2}$) and rate $ R $ to ca lcu latethesyndrome$s^ {(\ell )}: = H\cdot  {\hat {X}}_ A^ {(\ e l l)}$. A li cese nds the sy n d rom e $s^ {( \ell )}$ toBob. For all eleme n ts$j \in GF(2^{ d_2 })$a n dfor al l  in di c es$ i \in\{1,\dots,n\ }$ in thebl o ck  Bob calcu l ate sthe con ditiona l pro b ability  that $({ \hat{X}}_ A^ {(\e l l )}) _i=j
d_2$ least_significant bits_of the binary representation_of $x$._We_thus decompose_the_raw keys as_$X=({\hat{X}},{\check{X}})$, where ${\hat{X}}$_and ${\check{X}}$ denote the_sequence of the_$d_2$_most and the $d_1$ least significant bits of each key symbol, respectively. The reconciliation_module_performs the_following_steps:

(iii-a)_Based on the variance of_her binned raw key and_the samples_$X_A^\text{pe}$ and $X_B^\text{pe}$, Alice determines $d_1$, $d_2$, and_the_code rate $R$_such that the expected leakage is minimized w.r.t. the entropy_in Bob’s symbols, and transmits these_parameters to Bob.

(iii-b)_Then_Alice_communicates ${\check{X}}_A$ to Bob_who reconciles ${\check{X}}_B$ simply by setting_$ {\check{X}}_B:={\check{X}}_A $. Hence, the errors_which are left in Bob’s key $X_B$_are reduced to the errors in_${\hat{X}}_B$. Non-binary LDPC reconciliation is_used to_correct ${\hat{X}}_B$ as described in_the next step.

(iii-c)_Both Alice_and Bob split_their ${\hat{X}}_A$ and ${\hat{X}}_B$ into blocks_${\hat{X}}_A^{(\ell)}$ and ${\hat{X}}_B^{(\ell)}$,_$\ell=1,\dots, \frac{N-k}{n}$, each with $n=10^5$ elements_of_${\hat{\chi}}$. For this_step_we_identify $_{\hat{\chi}}$ with GF($2^{d_2}$),_the_Galois field_with_$2^{d_2}$ elements. For each block ${\hat{X}}_A^{(\ell)}$,_Alice_uses the parity check matrix $H$ of_an LDPC code over_GF($2^{d_2}$)_and rate $R$ to_calculate the syndrome $s^{(\ell)}:=H\cdot {\hat{X}}_A^{(\ell)}$._Alice sends the syndrome $s^{(\ell)}$ to_Bob. For_all elements_$j \in GF(2^{d_2})$ and for all indices $i\in\{1,\dots,n\}$ in the block_Bob calculates the conditional probability that_$({\hat{X}}_A^{(\ell)})_i=j