.\end{gathered}$$

The $S$ orbit function $S_{\lambda}(x)$, $\lambda\in P^{++}$ is defined as $$\begin{gathered}
\label{def_s-function1}
S_\lambda(x) := \sum_{\mu\in W_\lambda(G)} (-1)^{p(\mu)}e^{2\pi i \l\mu, x\r},\qquad
x\in\R^n,\end{gathered}$$ where $p(\mu)$ is the number of reflections necessary to obtain $\mu$ from $\lambda$. Of course the same $\mu$ can be obtained by different successions of reflections, but all routes from $\lambda$ to $\mu$ will have a length of the same parity, and thus the salient detail given by $p(\mu)$, in the context of an $S$-function, is meaningful and unchanging.

We define $E$ orbit function $E_{\lambda}(x)$, $\lambda\in P^e$ as $$\begin{gathered}
\label{def_e-function1}
E_\lambda(x) := \sum_{\mu\in W^e_{\lambda}(G)} e^{2\pi i \l\mu, x\r},
\qquad
x\in\R^n,\end{gathered}$$ where $P^e:=P^+\cup r_i P^+$ and $r_i$ is a reflection from $W$.

If we always suppose that $\lambda, \mu\in P$ are given in the $\w$-basis, and $x\in\R^n$ is given in the $\alpha$ basis, namely $\lambda=\sum\limits^n_{j=1}\lambda_j\w_j$, $\mu=\sum\limits^n_{j=1}\mu_j\w_j$, $\lambda_j, \mu_j\in\Z$ and $x=\sum\limits^n_{j=1}x_j\alpha_j$, $x_j\in \R$, then the orbit functions of $A_n$ have the following forms $$\begin{gathered}
C_\lambda(x)
= \sum_{\mu\in W_\lambda} e^{2\pi i \sum\limits^n_{j=1}\mu_jx_j}
= \sum_{\mu\
.\end{gathered}$$ 

 The $ S$ orbit function $ S_{\lambda}(x)$, $ \lambda\in P^{++}$ is defined as $ $ \begin{gathered } 
 \label{def_s - function1 } 
 S_\lambda(x): = \sum_{\mu\in W_\lambda(G) } (-1)^{p(\mu)}e^{2\pi i \l\mu, x\r},\qquad 
 x\in\R^n,\end{gathered}$$ where $ p(\mu)$ is the number of expression necessary to receive $ \mu$ from $ \lambda$. Of course the same $ \mu$ can be obtained by unlike successions of reflections, but all routes from $ \lambda$ to $ \mu$ will hold a length of the same parity bit, and therefore the salient detail given by $ p(\mu)$, in the context of an $ S$-function, is meaningful and static. 

 We define $ E$ orbit routine $ E_{\lambda}(x)$, $ \lambda\in P^e$ as $ $ \begin{gathered } 
 \label{def_e - function1 } 
 E_\lambda(x): = \sum_{\mu\in W^e_{\lambda}(G) } e^{2\pi i \l\mu, x\r }, 
 \qquad 
 x\in\R^n,\end{gathered}$$ where $ P^e:=P^+\cup r_i P^+$ and $ r_i$ is a mirror image from $ W$. 

 If we always suppose that $ \lambda, \mu\in P$ are given in the $ \w$-basis, and $ x\in\R^n$ is given in the $ \alpha$ basis, namely $ \lambda=\sum\limits^n_{j=1}\lambda_j\w_j$, $ \mu=\sum\limits^n_{j=1}\mu_j\w_j$, $ \lambda_j, \mu_j\in\Z$ and $ x=\sum\limits^n_{j=1}x_j\alpha_j$, $ x_j\in \R$, then the sphere functions of   $ A_n$ have the following shape $ $ \begin{gathered } 
 C_\lambda(x) 
 = \sum_{\mu\in W_\lambda } e^{2\pi i \sum\limits^n_{j=1}\mu_jx_j } 
 = \sum_{\mu\
.\end{hathered}$$

The $S$ orbit funcuion $S_{\lambda}(x)$, $\lamyea\in P^{++}$ is derined as $$\begin{gathered}
\label{def_s-functmon1}
S_\oambdq(x) := \sum_{\mu\in W_\lambda(G)} (-1)^{p(\ou)}e^{2\pi i \l\lu, x\r},\qquqd
x\ii\R^n,\end{gathered}$$ wisre $p(\mu)$ is ths numyec of reflectionx necessarf to obtain $\mu$ ffol $\lambda$. Of course the same $\mu$ can fe obtaonfd by differenj sucbefsiohs of reflections, but all routes fdom $\lamuda$ to $\mu$ will nave a length of the same oarihy, and thus the sapient detaio gidwn by $p(\mu)$, in the conteqc of an $S$-fuhction, is meaningful and unchaneing.

Wz define $E$ irvit xunction $E_{\lembda}(x)$, $\lambda\in P^e$ as $$\begit{gatherrd}
\label{def_e-fungtion1}
X_\lamvda(x) := \sum_{\mu\in W^e_{\lambde}(G)} e^{2\pi i \l\mu, x\r},
\qquad
v\in\R^n,\end{gdtkered}$$ where $P^e:=P^+\cup r_i P^+$ and $t_i$ is a rddleztikn fdom $W$.

Iv wx always sulpose that $\oambda, \mu\in P$ are govqb in the $\w$-basjs, and $x\yn\R^n$ is given in the $\alpha$ basis, namely $\lajbda=\sum\limits^n_{j=1}\lambda_j\w_h$, $\mu=\sum\limits^n_{j=1}\mu_j\w_j$, $\pambda_j, \mt_j\in\Z$ and $x=\sum\limits^n_{j=1}x_j\alpha_j$, $x_j\in \R$, then the ortit fnnztiinf if $W_n$ have the following forms $$\begin{gathered}
C_\lamfsa(c)
= \xum_{\mu\in W_\lambdc} e^{2\pi i \sum\limitx^n_{u=1}\mi_tx_j}
= \sum_{\mu\
.\end{gathered}$$ The $S$ orbit function $S_{\lambda}(x)$, $\lambda\in defined $$\begin{gathered} \label{def_s-function1} := \sum_{\mu\in W_\lambda(G)} where is the number reflections necessary to $\mu$ from $\lambda$. Of course the $\mu$ can be obtained by different successions of reflections, but all routes from to $\mu$ will have a length of the same parity, and thus the detail by in context of an $S$-function, is meaningful and unchanging. We define $E$ orbit function $E_{\lambda}(x)$, $\lambda\in P^e$ $$\begin{gathered} \label{def_e-function1} E_\lambda(x) := \sum_{\mu\in W^e_{\lambda}(G)} e^{2\pi i x\r}, \qquad x\in\R^n,\end{gathered}$$ where r_i P^+$ and $r_i$ is reflection $W$. If always that \mu\in P$ are in the $\w$-basis, and $x\in\R^n$ is given in the $\alpha$ basis, namely $\lambda=\sum\limits^n_{j=1}\lambda_j\w_j$, $\mu=\sum\limits^n_{j=1}\mu_j\w_j$, $\lambda_j, \mu_j\in\Z$ and $x_j\in \R$, orbit functions $A_n$ the forms $$\begin{gathered} C_\lambda(x) W_\lambda} e^{2\pi i \sum\limits^n_{j=1}\mu_jx_j} = \sum_{\mu\
.\end{gathered}$$

The $S$ orbit functIon $S_{\lambda}(X)$, $\lambDa\iN P^{++}$ iS dEfinEd as $$\Begin{gathered}
\lABel{dEf_s-function1}
S_\lambda(x) := \sum_{\Mu\in W_\LaMBda(G)} (-1)^{P(\Mu)}E^{2\pi i \l\Mu, x\r},\qquAD
x\IN\r^n,\eNd{GaTheReD}$$ WhEre $p(\mU)$ is The numbEr of reflecTioNs Necessary to oBTaIn $\mu$ from $\laMbdA$. Of course the SamE $\mu$ can Be ObtAIned bY diFfereNt succESsions Of reflectIoNS, but alL Routes fROM $\lAmbdA$ to $\mu$ will have a lenGTh OF the same parity, And thuS tHE sALIenT deTail given bY $p(\Mu)$, in tHE contexT Of AN $s$-FunCTion, is meaningFul and unchaNGinG.

We defInE $E$ oRBit funCtion $e_{\lAMbdA}(x)$, $\lambda\in P^E$ as $$\bEgin{gatheRed}
\labEL{def_e-fuNCtion1}
E_\lAmbda(x) := \Sum_{\Mu\iN W^e_{\lAMbDa}(g)} e^{2\pI i \L\Mu, x\R},
\QqUad
X\In\R^N,\end{gathErEd}$$ Where $p^e:=P^+\cUP R_I p^+$ and $R_i$ iS a reFlectIon from $W$.

If we aLwaYs suPPosE that $\LambdA, \mu\iN P$ Are giVen in tHe $\w$-baSiS, and $x\in\R^n$ is giveN in tHe $\alpha$ baSis, NaMelY $\lAmbda=\SUm\limiTs^n_{J=1}\laMbda_j\w_j$, $\Mu=\sum\liMIts^N_{j=1}\MU_J\W_j$, $\Lambda_j, \mu_j\in\Z$ and $x=\sUm\LIMiTs^n_{j=1}x_j\alPha_j$, $x_j\IN \R$, ThEN the orbiT fUncTionS OF $A_n$ haVe thE FoLlowing fOrms $$\beGIn{GaThered}
C_\LaMbda(x)
= \sUm_{\Mu\iN W_\lAmbda} E^{2\Pi i \sUm\limiTs^n_{j=1}\mu_jx_J}
= \sum_{\mU\
.\end{gathered}$$

The $S$  orbit fun ction  $S _{\ la mbda }(x) $, $\lambda\in P^{+ +}$ is defined as $$\b egin{ ga t here d }\labe l{def_s - fu n c tio n1 }S_\ la m bd a(x):=\sum_{\ mu\in W_\l amb da (G)} (-1)^{p ( \m u)}e^{2\pi  i\l\mu, x\r}, \qq uad
x\ in \R^ n ,\end {ga there d}$$ w h ere $p (\mu)$ is  t h e numb e r of re f l ec tion s necessary to ob t ai n  $\mu$ from $\ lambda $. Of c our sethe same $ \m u$ ca n  be obt a in e d byd ifferent succ essions ofr efl ection s,  bu t  all r outes  f r om$\lambda$ t o $\ mu$ willhave a lengtho f the s ame pa rit y,andt hu sthe  s a lie n tdet a ilgiven by  $ p( \mu)$ , in t h e  con tex t of  an $ S$-function,ismean i ngf ul an d unc hang in g.

W e defi ne $E $orbit function$E_{ \lambda}( x)$ ,$\l am bda\i n  P^e$as$$\ begin{g athered } 
\l ab e l { de f_e-function1}
E_\ la m b da (x) := \ sum_{\ m u\ in W^e_{\la mb da} (G)} e ^{2\p i i\ l\ mu, x\r} ,
\qqu a dx\ in\R^n, \e nd{gat he red }$$  wher e  $P^ e:=P^+ \cup r_i  P^+$ and $r_i$ is a reflection fr o m$ W $. 
Ifwealways supp oset hat$\la m bd a,\ mu\in  P$ a re gi v en in the $\w$-basi s,  and $ x\in\ R^n$ is given  in the $\ a l p ha$ basi s, n a me l y $\lambda=\su m\lim its^n_{j=1 } \lambda_ j\w_j $, $\mu= \sum\limi t s ^n_{j=1} \mu _j\ w_j $,$ \ la mbda_j, \mu_j \ i n\Z$  a nd $x=\ sum \limits ^n_ {j= 1}x _j\ al pha_j$, $ x_j\in \ R$ ,th en  th e orb i t functi on s o f$A_ n$ ha v e thefollo wing  f or m s $ $\begin { ga t h ered }C_ \lam bda (x )
= \ sum_ { \mu \in W_\ lambda} e ^{2 \ pi i  \ su m\limit s^n_{j=1}\mu_ jx _j}
= \sum _{ \mu \
.\end{gathered}$$

The $S$_orbit function_$S_{\lambda}(x)$, $\lambda\in P^{++}$ is_defined as_$$\begin{gathered}
\label{def_s-function1}
S_\lambda(x)_:= \sum_{\mu\in_W_\lambda(G)}_(-1)^{p(\mu)}e^{2\pi i \l\mu,_x\r},\qquad
x\in\R^n,\end{gathered}$$ where $p(\mu)$_is the number of_reflections necessary to_obtain_$\mu$ from $\lambda$. Of course the same $\mu$ can be obtained by different successions_of_reflections, but_all_routes_from $\lambda$ to $\mu$ will_have a length of the_same parity,_and thus the salient detail given by $p(\mu)$,_in_the context of_an $S$-function, is meaningful and unchanging.

We define $E$ orbit_function $E_{\lambda}(x)$, $\lambda\in P^e$ as $$\begin{gathered}
\label{def_e-function1}
E_\lambda(x)_:= \sum_{\mu\in W^e_{\lambda}(G)}_e^{2\pi_i_\l\mu, x\r},
\qquad
x\in\R^n,\end{gathered}$$ where $P^e:=P^+\cup_r_i P^+$ and $r_i$ is a_reflection from $W$.

If we always suppose_that $\lambda, \mu\in P$ are given in_the $\w$-basis, and $x\in\R^n$ is given_in the $\alpha$ basis, namely_$\lambda=\sum\limits^n_{j=1}\lambda_j\w_j$, $\mu=\sum\limits^n_{j=1}\mu_j\w_j$,_$\lambda_j, \mu_j\in\Z$ and $x=\sum\limits^n_{j=1}x_j\alpha_j$, $x_j\in_\R$, then the_orbit functions_of $A_n$ have the_following forms $$\begin{gathered}
C_\lambda(x)
= \sum_{\mu\in W_\lambda} e^{2\pi_i \sum\limits^n_{j=1}\mu_jx_j}
= \sum_{\mu\