 These generate a downward flux in momentum space, but one which is distributed throughout the acceleration region. Combined with the fact that the size of the “box” or region normally increases with energy this also gives an additional loss process because particles can now fall through the back of the “box” as well as being advected out of it (see Fig. 1). Note that particles which fall through the front of the box are advected back into the acceleration region and thus this process does not work upstream.

If the loss rate is $\dot p = -\alpha p^2$ the basic equation becomes + [p]{}=\
Q - U\_2 4p\^2 f(p) - 4p\^4 f(p) [dL\_2dp]{} This equation is easily generalised to the case of different loss rates upstream and downstream. Simplifying equation (12) gives L[ft]{} + p[fp]{} +\
f= [Q4p\^2]{}. Note that for convenience we have dropped the explicit vector (and tensor) notation; all non-scalar quantities are to be interpreted as normal components, that is $U_2$ means $\bf n\cdot U_2$ etc. Note also that our model differs from that of Protheroe and Stanev in that they do not allow for the extra loss process resulting from the energy dependence of the “box” size.

In the steady state and away from the source region this gives immediately the remarkably simple result for the logarithmic slope of the spectrum, = -3[U\_1 - U\_2 - 3pL]{}. Note that at small values of $p$ we recover the standard result, that the power-law exponent is $-3 U_1/(U_1 - U_2)$.

=

=

Under normal circumstances both $L_1$ and $L_2$ are monotonically increasing functions of $p$. Thus both the numerator and denominator of the above expression, regarded as functions of $p$, have single zeroes at which they change sign. The denominator goes to zero at the critical momentum p\^\* = [U\_1 - U\_23L]{} where the losses exactly balance the acceleration. If the numerator at this point is negative, the slope goes to $-\infty$ and there is no pile-up. However the slope goes to $+\infty$ and a pile-up occurs if U\_1 - 4 U\_2 + 3
These generate a downward flux in momentum space, but one which is distribute throughout the acceleration area. Combined with the fact that the size of the “ box ” or area normally increases with department of energy this also gives an extra loss process because particles can nowadays fall through the back of the “ corner ” as well as being advected out of it (see Fig.   1). Note that particle which fall through the front of the box are advected back into the acceleration region and therefore this process does not work upstream. 

 If the loss pace is $ \dot p = -\alpha p^2 $ the basic equation becomes + [ p]{}=\ 
 Q - U\_2 4p\^2 f(p) - 4p\^4 f(p) [ dL\_2dp ] { } This equation is easily generalize to the case of different loss rates upstream and downstream. Simplifying equality (12) gives L[ft ] { } + p[fp ] { } + \ 
 f= [ Q4p\^2 ] { }. Note that for convenience we have dropped the explicit vector (and tensor) notation; all non - scalar quantity are to be interpreted as normal components, that is $ U_2 $ means $ \bf n\cdot U_2 $ etc. Note also that our model differs from that of Protheroe and Stanev in that they do not allow for the extra loss procedure resulting from the energy addiction of the “ corner ” size. 

 In the steady state and away from the source area this gives immediately the unusually simple result for the logarithmic gradient of the spectrum, = -3[U\_1 - U\_2 - 3pL ] { }. Note that at small values of $ p$ we recover the standard result, that the power - law exponent is $ -3 U_1/(U_1 - U_2)$. 

 = 

 = 

 Under normal circumstances both $ L_1 $ and $ L_2 $ are monotonically increasing functions of $ p$. Thus both the numerator and denominator of the above formula, regarded as function of $ p$, have single zeroes at which they change sign. The denominator run to zero at the critical momentum p\^\ * = [ U\_1 - U\_23L ] { } where the losses exactly balance the acceleration. If the numerator at this item is negative, the slope goes to $ -\infty$ and there is no atomic pile - up. However the slope fail to $ + \infty$ and a pile - up occurs if U\_1 - 4 U\_2 + 3
 Thfse generate a downward nlux in momentum space, uut one which ir distributed throughout the axceleeation region. Combined with the fact thqt tie size of the “box” or rennon nkvmallv mncreases with gnergy this dlso gives an ddaicional loss process because particlef can npw fall through jhe bssk or the “box” as well as being advectes out oh it (see Fig. 1). Noye that particles which fapl tjrough the front ov the box ats aqcected back knto the abeeleration tegion and thus this process doer not work upsttzqm.

Iv the loss rete is $\dot p = -\alpha p^2$ the tasic eauation becomex + [']{}=\
Q - Y\_2 4p\^2 f(p) - 4p\^4 f(p) [dL\_2dp]{} Thiv equation is easijy generaniaed to the case od eiffetent noss eatds hpxtdeam ajd vownstream. Aimplifying equation (12) gives L[fu]{} + [[dp]{} +\
f= [Q4p\^2]{}. Note fhat fjr convenience we have dropped the explicpt vsctor (and tensor) notatiin; all non-scalar quanjities are to be interpreted as normal components, that is $U_2$ meana $\bf n\gdot Y_2$ ftc. Note also that our model differs from thae og Irotheroe and Stakev in that they dp joy allow for thg extra loas process resultijg from the wnergy dekendemce of the “box” size.

In the sready state cnd away from the souxce region tkis gifes ikmediately the remarkabuy sjmple resulh for the uogarithmic slopd on tve spectrum, = -3[U\_1 - U\_2 - 3pL]{}. Note that at wmalk valuer of $p$ we wecover thf stakgard result, that tje pocer-laf exponent is $-3 U_1/(U_1 - U_2)$.

=

=

Under normal circumsteices both $L_1$ amd $L_2$ dre monoconicakly increasind functions of $p$. Thus both the numerztor anv denominatow of the abova expression, cegarded ws fynctuons of $o$, have single aeroes at which thet change sign. The venoojnator goes to vtro at the criticak mumegtlm '\^\* = [U\_1 - G\_23L]{} where the losres rxactuy balance bhe accrleration. If the numaratkr at this point ix kegative, jhe slope goes to $-\inftu$ and there is no kile-up. Hoxever yhe slope goes to $+\infty$ and a pils-up occurd in U\_1 - 4 U\_2 + 3
These generate a downward flux in momentum one is distributed the acceleration region. the of the “box” region normally increases energy this also gives an additional process because particles can now fall through the back of the “box” as as being advected out of it (see Fig. 1). Note that particles which through front the are advected back into the acceleration region and thus this process does not work upstream. If loss rate is $\dot p = -\alpha p^2$ basic equation becomes + Q - U\_2 4p\^2 f(p) 4p\^4 [dL\_2dp]{} This is generalised the case of loss rates upstream and downstream. Simplifying equation (12) gives L[ft]{} + p[fp]{} +\ f= [Q4p\^2]{}. Note that convenience we the explicit (and notation; non-scalar quantities are interpreted as normal components, that is n\cdot U_2$ etc. Note also that our model from that Protheroe and Stanev in that they not allow for the extra loss process resulting the energy dependence of the “box” size. In the steady state and away from the this gives immediately the simple result for logarithmic of spectrum, -3[U\_1 - - 3pL]{}. Note that at small values of $p$ we recover standard result, that the power-law exponent is $-3 U_1/(U_1 - = normal circumstances both and $L_2$ are monotonically functions $p$. Thus both the denominator the as of have single zeroes at they change sign. The denominator to zero at the - U\_23L]{} where the losses exactly balance the If the numerator at this point is the slope goes to $-\infty$ and there is no pile-up. However the goes to a pile-up occurs if U\_1 - 4 U\_2 3
 These generate a downward fluX in momentuM spacE, buT onE wHich Is diStributed throuGHout The acceleration region. COmbinEd WIth tHE fAct thAt the siZE oF THe “bOx” Or RegIoN NoRmallY inCreases With energy ThiS aLso gives an adDItIonal loss pRocEss because paRtiCles caN nOw fALl thrOugH the bAck of tHE “box” as Well as beiNg ADvecteD Out of it (SEE FIg. 1). NoTe that particles whICh FAll through the fRont of ThE BoX ARe aDveCted back inTo The acCEleratiON rEGIOn aND thus this procEss does not wORk uPstreaM.

IF thE Loss raTe is $\dOt P = -\AlpHa p^2$ the basic EquaTion becomEs + [p]{}=\
Q - U\_2 4p\^2 F(P) - 4p\^4 f(p) [dL\_2dP]{} this equAtion iS eaSilY genERaLiSed To THe cASe Of dIFfeRent loss RaTeS upstReam AND DOwnsTreAm. SiMplifYing equation (12) gIveS L[ft]{} + P[Fp]{} +\
f= [q4p\^2]{}. NotE that For cOnVenieNce we hAve drOpPed the explicit vEctoR (and tensoR) noTaTioN; aLl non-SCalar qUanTitIes are tO be inteRPreTeD AS NoRmal components, that Is $u_2$ MEaNs $\bf n\cdoT U_2$ etc. NOTe AlSO that our MoDel DiffERS from That OF PRotheroe And StaNEv In That theY dO not alLoW foR thE extrA Loss ProcesS resultiNg froM The energy depenDEnce of the “box” sIZe.

iN ThE SteaDy sTate and away From THe soUrce REgIon THis giVes imMeDIaTEly the remarkably simPlE resulT for tHe logarithmic Slope of the SPECtrum, = -3[U\_1 - U\_2 - 3pl]{}. NotE ThAT at small values Of $p$ we Recover the STandard rEsult, That the pOwer-law exPONent is $-3 U_1/(U_1 - u_2)$.

=

=

UnDer NorMal CIRcUmstances both $l_1$ ANd $L_2$ aRe MonotonIcaLly incrEasIng FunCtiOnS of $p$. Thus bOth the nuMeRaToR aNd dEnomiNAtor of thE aBovE eXprEssioN, RegardEd as fUnctIoNs OF $p$, hAve singLE zEROes aT wHiCh thEy cHaNge siGn. ThE DenOminatoR goes to zeRo aT The cRiTiCal momeNtum p\^\* = [U\_1 - U\_23L]{} where ThE losses exaCtLy bAlance THE accelerAtion. If the numerator at thIS point iS neGativE, the Slope goes To $-\iNfty$ anD thERe is no Pile-up. howevEr The SLOpe goES To $+\InfTy$ And a pile-up OCCurS if U\_1 - 4 U\_2 + 3
 These generate a downward  flux in m oment umspa ce , bu t on e which is dis t ribu ted throughout the acc elera ti o n re g io n. Co mbinedw it h the  f ac t t ha t  t he si zeof the“box” or r egi on  normally in c re ases withene rgy this als o g ives a nadd i tiona l l oss p rocess becaus e particl es can no w  fall t h r ou gh t he back of the “b o x” as well as bei ng adv ec t ed o utofit (see Fi g.  1).N ote tha t  p a r t icl e s which fallthrough the fro nt ofth e b o x areadvec te d  ba ck into the  acc eleration  regio n  and th u s thisproces s d oes  not wo rk  up st r eam . 
Ift heloss rat eis  $\do t p= - \ alph a p ^2$the b asic equation  be come s  +[p]{} =\
Q- U\ _2  4p\^ 2 f(p)  - 4p \^ 4 f(p) [dL\_2dp ]{}This equa tio nisea silyg eneral ise d t o the c ase ofd iff er e n t  l oss rates upstream  a n d  d ownstrea m. Sim p li fy i ng equat io n ( 12)g i ves L [ft] { }+ p[fp]{ } +\
f =  [ Q4 p\^2]{} .Note t ha t f orconve n ienc e we h ave drop ped t h e explicit vec t or (and tenso r )n o ta t ion;  al l non-scala r qu a ntit iesa re  to be in terpr et e da s normal components ,that i s $U_ 2$ means $\bf  n\cdot U_ 2 $ etc. Not e al s ot hat our modeldiffe rs from th a t of Pro thero e and St anev in t h a t they d o n otall owf o rthe extra los s proc es s resul tin g fromthe  en erg y d ep endence o f the “b ox ”si ze .
In th e  steadyst ate  a ndawayf rom th e sou rcere gi o n t his giv e si m medi at el y th e r em arkab ly s i mpl e resul t for the  lo g arit hm ic  slopeof the spectr um , = -3[U\_ 1- U \_2 -3 p L]{}. No te that at small values of $p$werecov er t he standa rdresult , t h at the  power -lawex pon e n t is$ - 3U_1 /( U_1 - U_2) $ . 

= 

=
Un dernormalcircumstances both $L_ 1$ and $L_2$are  mon o t on ica l ly inc re a sin g functions of $p $. Thus bo th th e numerato r  an ddenomin ator of  thea bove ex pression,  regarded  a s fu n c tio ns of $p$,  have si ngle zero e s atw hi ch th eychange  s ign . The  denom i nat or go es toze ro atthe c ri tical mo mentum p\^\* = [U\_1 -U\_23L ]{} w her e the los ses exa ctly bala ncethe accele rat ion . Ifthe numer ator at  th i s poi nt i s  negative ,  t hes l op e goes to $ - \ i nft y$ an d t h ere is  nopile-up. Howevert he slope goesto $ + \ inf ty$ andapile-up occurs  if  U \ _ 1 - 4 U\ _2  + 3
 These_generate a_downward flux in momentum_space, but_one_which is_distributed_throughout the acceleration_region. Combined with_the fact that the_size of the_“box”_or region normally increases with energy this also gives an additional loss process because_particles_can now_fall_through_the back of the “box”_as well as being advected_out of_it (see Fig. 1). Note that particles which fall_through_the front of_the box are advected back into the acceleration region_and thus this process does not_work upstream.

If the_loss_rate_is $\dot p =_-\alpha p^2$ the basic equation becomes_+ [p]{}=\
Q - U\_2 4p\^2 f(p)_- 4p\^4 f(p) [dL\_2dp]{} This equation is_easily generalised to the case of_different loss rates upstream and_downstream. Simplifying_equation (12) gives L[ft]{} +_p[fp]{} +\
f= [Q4p\^2]{}._Note that_for convenience we_have dropped the explicit vector (and_tensor) notation; all_non-scalar quantities are to be interpreted_as_normal components, that_is_$U_2$_means $\bf_n\cdot U_2$ etc._Note_also that_our_model differs from that of Protheroe_and_Stanev in that they do not allow_for the extra loss_process_resulting from the energy_dependence of the “box” size.

In_the steady state and away from_the source_region this_gives immediately the remarkably simple result for the logarithmic slope of_the spectrum, = -3[U\_1 - U\_2_- 3pL]{}. Note that_at small_values_of $p$ we_recover_the standard_result, that the power-law exponent is $-3_U_1/(U_1 -_U_2)$.

=

=

Under normal circumstances both $L_1$ and_$L_2$ are monotonically increasing_functions_of $p$. Thus both the numerator_and denominator of the above expression,_regarded as functions of $p$,_have_single_zeroes at which they change_sign. The denominator goes to zero_at the critical_momentum p\^\* = [U\_1 - U\_23L]{} where_the_losses exactly balance the acceleration. If_the_numerator at this point is negative,_the_slope_goes to $-\infty$ and there_is no pile-up. However the slope_goes to $+\infty$ and a pile-up occurs if U\_1_- 4 U\_2_+ 3