 ‘dot-com’ bubble, most universities were slow to respond. As a result, the landscape today is highly fractured. While serious computing power exists at select locations (in the US, primarily national laboratories and a few, highly subscribed supercomputer centers), most research groups are hard pressed to put together and maintain a compute cluster with a few tens of processors.

In recent years, strong support for bandwidth-oriented development has created a new atmosphere of opportunity for computational research. Within the nascent world of Grid computing lie a number of rational elements to improve research productivity, such as intelligent networked resource brokers and schedulers, dedicated “quality of service” bandwidth, and single sign-on authorization. The computational cosmology community should take a more active role in establishing the ‘middle-ware’ elements needed to enhance productivity within collaborations and the sharing of information within and among them.

The building of Theory Virtual Observatory archives, with libraries of open source codes, raw resources (particle/cell-level files), and processed resources (halo catalogs and histories, sky survey catalogs, sky maps) needs to get underway in earnest. Dark energy science demands theory support at the highest level and of the highest quality. The time has come to leverage the networked resources of the information age and build a cyberinfrastructure framework that will bring theory and observation closer together, enhancing dark energy and astrophysical science studies in the process.

[**References**]{}

[ =1 $^{\ino}$ See [http://www.darkenergysurvey.org]{} $^{\ino}$ Seljak, U., [Sugiyama]{}, N., [White]{}, M., [Zaldarriaga]{}, M. 2003, PhRvD, 3507 $^{\ino}$ J. Annis 2005, Theory White Paper to the Dark Energy Task Force $^{\ino}$ Springel, V. 2005, Nature, 435, 629 $^{\ino}$ Sirko, E. 2005, ApJ, submitted, ([astro-ph/0503106]{}) $^{\ino}$ [[Hamilton]{}, A.J.S., [Kumar]{}, P., [Lu]{}, E. and [Matthews]{}, A.]{} 1991, ApJ, 374, L1; [Peacock]{}, J.A. and [Dodds]{}, S.J. 1996, MNRAS, 280, L19; Smith, R.E. 2003, MNRAS, 341, 1311. $^{\ino}$ Frenk, C.
‘ dot - com ’ bubble, most universities were slow to react. As a resultant role, the landscape today is highly fractured. While serious computing power exist at select locations (in the US, chiefly national laboratories and a few, highly subscribed supercomputer center), most research groups are heavily pressed to put together and sustain a compute cluster with a few tens of processors. 

 In recent years, strong documentation for bandwidth - oriented development has created a modern atmosphere of opportunity for computational research. Within the nascent world of Grid computing dwell a number of rational elements to improve research productiveness, such as intelligent networked resource brokers and schedulers, dedicated “ quality of service ” bandwidth, and individual sign - on authorization. The computational cosmology community should take a more active role in establishing the ‘ middle - ware ’ elements needed to enhance productiveness within collaboration and the sharing of data within and among them. 

 The construction of Theory Virtual Observatory archive, with libraries of open source codes, raw resources (particle / cell - floor files), and processed resources (halo catalog and histories, sky survey catalogs, sky maps) need to get afoot in dear. Dark energy science demands hypothesis support at the highest level and of the highest quality. The time has come to leverage the networked resources of the information long time and build a cyberinfrastructure framework that will institute theory and notice closer together, enhancing dark department of energy and astrophysical science studies in the process. 

 [ * * References * * ] { } 

 [ = 1 $ ^{\ino}$ See [ http://www.darkenergysurvey.org ] { } $ ^{\ino}$ Seljak, U., [ Sugiyama ] { }, N., [ White ] { }, M., [ Zaldarriaga ] { }, M. 2003, PhRvD, 3507 $ ^{\ino}$ J. Annis 2005, Theory White Paper to the Dark Energy Task Force $ ^{\ino}$ Springel, V. 2005, Nature, 435, 629 $ ^{\ino}$ Sirko, E. 2005, ApJ, put in, ([ astro - ph/0503106 ] { }) $ ^{\ino}$ [ [ Hamilton ] { }, A.J.S., [ Kumar ] { }, P., [ Lu ] { }, E. and [ Matthews ] { }, A. ] { } 1991, ApJ, 374, L1; [ Peacock ] { }, J.A. and [ Dodds ] { }, S.J. 1996, MNRAS, 280, L19; Smith, R.E. 2003, MNRAS, 341, 1311. $ ^{\ino}$ Frenk, C.
 ‘doh-com’ bubble, most universlties were slow jo respoid. As a result, ghe landscape today is highlb frqcturtb. While serious compjting powvr exists at wwlect locavjons (in the UA, prikerily national kaboratorias and a few, hhgflv subscribed supercomputer centers), mjst resragch groups are harc preased to put together and maintain z compuue cluster with a gew tens of processors.

In rfcenh years, strong supoort for babdwiqrh-oriented ddvelopment has created a new atmosphere of opportunith for computatiinql ggsearch. Withmn the nascent world of Grhd compiting lie a nukbec of rational elements to improve research kroductividy, such as intelligwnr netforkad rdwoufce bcoksrs anf srhedulers, dsdicated “quqlity of service” bamdrpcth, and singme sigg-og authorization. The computational cosmonogg community should take a more active role ij establifhing the ‘middle-ware’ elements needed to enhance psoducvixitv withkb follaborations and the sharing of information siuhik and among them.

Bhe building of Throgy Dirtual Obserxatory ardhives, with librarles of jpen wource coqes, taw resources (particle/cell-lwvel files), aud processed resourced (halo catauogs and nistories, sky survey cacalogs, sky maps) nfeds to gsg underway in eafnext. Dark entfgy science demanqs theory sup'ort at ghe nighese level anf of bve highest quality. The jime hds come to leverage the networked resourcxx of the infprkatpon age aud buikd a cyberinfwastructure frcmework chat wkll bring nheory anv observatiog closer togedjer, enhancinj dark enqrgy and astropfhsical science studies pn the process.

[**References**]{}

[ =1 $^{\ivk}$ See [http://www.daxytnwrgysurvey.org]{} $^{\ono}$ Sejjwk, U., [Vugiyama]{}, N., [Wvite]{}, M., [Xsldarfiaga]{}, M. 2003, PhVvD, 3507 $^{\inp}$ J. Annis 2005, Theory Whhte Laper to the Dark Rncrgy Task Force $^{\igo}$ Springel, V. 2005, Nature, 435, 629 $^{\ino}$ Sirno, E. 2005, ApO, submottgd, ([astro-ph/0503106]{}) $^{\ino}$ [[Hamilton]{}, A.J.S., [Kumzr]{}, P., [Lu]{}, E. anq [Matthews]{}, A.]{} 1991, ApM, 374, L1; [Peacock]{}, J.C. and [Dodds]{}, S.J. 1996, MNRAS, 280, L19; Smith, R.E. 2003, MNRAS, 341, 1311. $^{\ino}$ Frenk, C.
‘dot-com’ bubble, most universities were slow to a the landscape is highly fractured. at locations (in the primarily national laboratories a few, highly subscribed supercomputer centers), research groups are hard pressed to put together and maintain a compute cluster a few tens of processors. In recent years, strong support for bandwidth-oriented development created new of for computational research. Within the nascent world of Grid computing lie a number of rational elements improve research productivity, such as intelligent networked resource and schedulers, dedicated “quality service” bandwidth, and single sign-on The cosmology community take more role in establishing ‘middle-ware’ elements needed to enhance productivity within collaborations and the sharing of information within and among them. building of Observatory archives, libraries open codes, raw resources and processed resources (halo catalogs and catalogs, sky maps) needs to get underway in Dark energy demands theory support at the highest and of the highest quality. The time has to leverage the networked resources of the information age and build a cyberinfrastructure framework that theory and observation closer enhancing dark energy astrophysical studies the [**References**]{} [ $^{\ino}$ See [http://www.darkenergysurvey.org]{} $^{\ino}$ Seljak, U., [Sugiyama]{}, N., [White]{}, M., [Zaldarriaga]{}, 2003, PhRvD, 3507 $^{\ino}$ J. Annis 2005, Theory White Paper Dark Task Force $^{\ino}$ V. 2005, Nature, 435, $^{\ino}$ E. 2005, ApJ, submitted, [[Hamilton]{}, [Kumar]{}, and A.]{} ApJ, 374, L1; [Peacock]{}, and [Dodds]{}, S.J. 1996, MNRAS, L19; Smith, R.E. 2003, C.
 ‘dot-com’ bubble, most universitIes were sloW to reSpoNd. AS a ResuLt, thE landscape todaY Is hiGhly fractured. While seriOus coMpUTing POwEr exiSts at seLEcT LOcaTiOnS (in ThE uS, PrimaRilY nationAl laboratoRieS aNd a few, highly SUbScribed supErcOmputer centeRs), mOst resEaRch GRoups Are Hard pRessed TO put toGether and MaINtain a COmpute cLUStEr wiTh a few tens of proceSSoRS.

In recent years, Strong SuPPoRT For BanDwidth-orieNtEd devELopment HAs CREAteD A new atmospherE of opportunITy fOr compUtAtiONal resEarch. wiTHin The nascent wOrld Of Grid comPuting LIe a numbER of ratiOnal elEmeNts To imPRoVe ResEaRCh pROdUctIVitY, such as iNtElLigenT netWORKEd reSouRce bRokerS and schedulerS, deDicaTEd “qUalitY of seRvicE” bAndwiDth, and SinglE sIgn-on authorizatIon. THe computaTioNaL coSmOlogy COmmuniTy sHouLd take a More actIVe rOlE IN EsTablishing the ‘middlE-wARE’ eLements nEeded tO EnHaNCe producTiVitY witHIN collAborATiOns and thE shariNG oF iNformatIoN withiN aNd aMonG them.

tHe buIlding Of Theory virtuAL Observatory arCHives, with librARiES Of OPen sOurCe codes, raw rEsouRCes (pArtiCLe/CelL-Level Files), AnD PrOCessed resources (halo CaTalogs And hiStories, sky surVey catalogS, SKY maps) neeDs to GEt UNderway in earneSt. DarK energy sciENce demanDs theOry suppoRt at the hiGHEst level And Of tHe hIghEST qUality. The time HAS comE tO leveraGe tHe netwoRkeD reSouRceS oF the inforMation agE aNd BuIlD a cYberiNFrastrucTuRe fRaMewOrk thAT will bRing tHeorY aNd OBseRvation CLoSER togEtHeR, enhAncInG dark EnerGY anD astropHysical scIenCE stuDiEs In the prOcess.

[**ReferencEs**]{}

[ =1 $^{\Ino}$ See [http://WwW.daRkenerGYSurvey.orG]{} $^{\ino}$ Seljak, U., [Sugiyama]{}, N., [WhiTE]{}, M., [ZaldaRriAga]{}, M. 2003, PHRvD, 3507 $^{\Ino}$ J. Annis 2005, theOry WhiTe PAPer to tHe Dark energY TAsk fORce $^{\inO}$ sPrIngEl, v. 2005, Nature, 435, 629 $^{\ino}$ sIRko, e. 2005, ApJ, sUbMittEd, ([astro-Ph/0503106]{}) $^{\ino}$ [[Hamilton]{}, A.J.S., [KuMAr]{}, P., [lu]{}, E. and [MatthewS]{}, A.]{} 1991, APJ, 374, L1; [PEACoCk]{}, J.a. AnD [dodDs]{}, s.j. 1996, MNras, 280, L19; Smith, R.E. 2003, MNRAS, 341, 1311. $^{\iNo}$ Frenk, C.
 ‘dot-com’ bubble, most un iversities  were  sl owto  res pond . As a result, thelandscape today is hig hly f ra c ture d .While  seriou s  c o m put in gpow er ex istsatselectlocations(in  t he US, prima r il y national  la boratories a nda few,  h igh l y sub scr ibedsuperc o mputer  centers) ,m ost re s earch g r o up s ar e hard pressed to pu t  together andmainta in ac o mpu tecluster wi th  a fe w  tens o f  p r o c ess o rs.

In recen t years, st r ong  suppo rt  fo r  bandw idth- or i ent ed developm enthas creat ed a n e w atmos p here of  oppor tun ity  for co mp uta ti o nal re sea r ch.  Withinth enasce nt w o r l d  ofGri d co mputi ng lie a numb erof r a tio nal e lemen ts t oimpro ve res earch  p roductivity, su ch a s intelli gen tnet wo rkedr esourc e b rok ers and  schedu l ers ,d e d ic ated “quality of s er v i ce ” bandwi dth, a n dsi n gle sign -o n a utho r i zatio n. T h ecomputat ionalc os mo logy co mm unitysh oul d t ake a more  activ e role i n est a blishing the ‘ m iddle-ware’ e l em e n ts need edto enhanceprod u ctiv ityw it hin colla borat io n sa nd the sharing of i nf ormati on wi thin and amon g them.

T h e building  ofT he o ry Virtual Obs ervat ory archiv e s, withlibra ries ofopen sour c e  codes,raw  re sou rce s (p article/cell- l e velfi les), a ndprocess edres our ces  ( halo cata logs and  h is to ri es,  skys urvey ca ta log s,  sk y map s ) need s togetun de r way  in ear n es t .  Dar ken ergy  sc ie nce d eman d s t heory s upport at  th e  hig he st  leveland of the hi gh est qualit y.  Th e time h as cometo leverage the network e d resou rce s oftheinformati onage an d b u ild acyberi nfras tr uct u r e fra m e wo rkth at will br i n g t heory  a nd o bservat ion closer togethe r , e nhancing dark  en ergy a nd  as t ro p hys ic a l s c i ence studies in  the proce ss . 
[**Referen c es* *] {}

[ = 1 $^{\i no}$S ee [htt p://www.d arkenergy su rvey . o rg] {} $^{\ino }$ Selja k, U., [S u giyam a ]{ }, N. , [ White] {} , M ., [Z aldarr i aga ]{},M. 200 3,  PhRvD , 350 7$^{\ino} $ J. Annis 2005, Theory  White  Pape r t o the Dar k E n erg y Task Fo rce$^{\ino}$Spr ing el, V . 2 0 05, N atur e ,435 ,  629$^{\ i no}$ Sirk o ,E.2 0 05 , ApJ, subm i t t ed,  ([as tro - ph/050 3106 ]{}) $^{\ino}$ [[ H amilton]{}, A. J.S. , [Ku mar ] {},P. , [Lu]{}, E. a nd[M a t thews]{} ,A.]{} 1991,  ApJ, 37 4, L1; [ Peacoc k]{},J.A. an d [D o dds]{} , S. J.1996, MNR AS,  2 8 0, L19;  S mi t h, R.E . 20 03 , MNRA S, 341 ,  131 1 .  $^{\ino}$ Frenk , C.
 ‘dot-com’_bubble, most_universities were slow to_respond. As_a_result, the_landscape_today is highly_fractured. While serious_computing power exists at_select locations (in_the_US, primarily national laboratories and a few, highly subscribed supercomputer centers), most research groups_are_hard pressed_to_put_together and maintain a compute_cluster with a few tens_of processors.

In_recent years, strong support for bandwidth-oriented development has_created_a new atmosphere_of opportunity for computational research. Within the nascent world_of Grid computing lie a number_of rational elements_to_improve_research productivity, such as_intelligent networked resource brokers and schedulers,_dedicated “quality of service” bandwidth, and_single sign-on authorization. The computational cosmology community_should take a more active role_in establishing the ‘middle-ware’ elements_needed to_enhance productivity within collaborations and_the sharing of_information within_and among them.

The_building of Theory Virtual Observatory archives,_with libraries of_open source codes, raw resources (particle/cell-level_files),_and processed resources_(halo_catalogs_and histories,_sky survey catalogs,_sky_maps) needs_to_get underway in earnest. Dark energy_science_demands theory support at the highest level_and of the highest_quality._The time has come_to leverage the networked resources_of the information age and build_a cyberinfrastructure_framework that_will bring theory and observation closer together, enhancing dark energy and_astrophysical science studies in the process.

[**References**]{}

[_=1 $^{\ino}$ See [http://www.darkenergysurvey.org]{}_$^{\ino}$ Seljak,_U.,_[Sugiyama]{}, N., [White]{},_M.,_[Zaldarriaga]{}, M._2003, PhRvD, 3507 $^{\ino}$ J. Annis 2005,_Theory White_Paper to the Dark Energy Task_Force $^{\ino}$ Springel, V._2005,_Nature, 435, 629 $^{\ino}$ Sirko, E._2005, ApJ, submitted, ([astro-ph/0503106]{}) $^{\ino}$ [[Hamilton]{},_A.J.S., [Kumar]{}, P., [Lu]{}, E._and_[Matthews]{},_A.]{} 1991, ApJ, 374, L1;_[Peacock]{}, J.A. and [Dodds]{}, S.J. 1996,_MNRAS, 280, L19;_Smith, R.E. 2003, MNRAS, 341, 1311. $^{\ino}$_Frenk,_C.