yukons” by a few scientists. Hans Euler and Werner Heisenberg then discussed in 1938 “the hypothesis that the hard component of cosmic rays consisted of mesotrons produced in the upper layers of the atmosphere by primary electrons or photons and then disintegrating, as predicted by Yukawa’s theory \[…\] with a life-time of the order of $10^{-6}$ secs.” (cf. [@Rossi1938b], p. 993). Such an hypothesis led to an anomalous attenuation in the atmosphere due to the decay of mesotrons in flight [@EulerHeisenberg1938]. As a matter of fact, in Asmara, in 1933, Rossi and De Benedetti had been the first to observe such an anomalous effect, as they had detected a decrease in the intensity of cosmic rays passing through the atmosphere decisively larger than what was expected. They could not explain the phenomenon at that time, but Rossi immediately interpreted it in 1938, after the publication of Euler and Heisenberg’s paper [@Rossi1938b].

It is worth pointing out that at that time, in 1938, Rossi was in Copenhagen, as he had just been forced to leave Italy because of the fascist racial laws. After short periods in Copenhagen and Manchester, Rossi went to the United States, working first at Cornell University, then at Los Alamos, and finally, from 1946 onwards, at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). His departure was of course an invaluable loss for Italian physics.

Cosmic-ray studies in Italy during World War II
-----------------------------------------------

Besides Rossi, a few other physicists who had been with him in Arcetri, had also started working on cosmic rays. Gilberto Bernardini and Giuseppe Occhialini, in particular, both played an important role in the field, though their scientific careers were very different one from the other: Bernardini mainly spent the 1930s and the 1940s in Italy, and he significantly contributed to the development of cosmic ray researches within the country, while Occhialini spent many years abroad, where he gave fundamental contributions. We have already discussed Occhialini’s working with Blackett on cloud chambers in Cambridge, and we will see more about his work in the following sections.

As for Bernardini, he carried out his first researches on cosmic rays in the early 30s in Florence, where he collaborated with Sergio de Benedetti and Daria Bocciarelli
yukons ” by a few scientists. Hans Euler and Werner Heisenberg then discussed in 1938 “ the hypothesis that the unvoiced part of cosmic rays consisted of meson produced in the upper layer of the atmosphere by chief electrons or photons and then disintegrate, as predicted by Yukawa ’s theory \[ … \ ] with a life sentence - time of the order of $ 10^{-6}$ secant. ” (cf. [ @Rossi1938b ], p. 993). Such an guess led to an anomalous attenuation in the atmosphere due to the decay of meson in flight [ @EulerHeisenberg1938 ]. As a topic of fact, in Asmara, in 1933, Rossi and De Benedetti had been the beginning to observe such an anomalous effect, as they had detected a decrease in the saturation of cosmic rays passing through the standard atmosphere decisively larger than what was expect. They could not explain the phenomenon at that time, but Rossi immediately interpreted it in 1938, after the publication of Euler and Heisenberg ’s paper [ @Rossi1938b ]. 

 It is deserving pointing out that at that time, in 1938, Rossi was in Copenhagen, as he had just been forced to leave Italy because of the fascist racial laws. After light periods in Copenhagen and Manchester, Rossi went to the United States, working first at Cornell University, then at Los Alamos, and finally, from 1946 onwards, at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). His departure was of course an invaluable loss for Italian physics. 

 Cosmic - beam studies in Italy during World War II 
 ----------------------------------------------- 

 Besides Rossi, a few other physicist who had been with him in Arcetri, had besides started working on cosmic rays. Gilberto Bernardini and Giuseppe Occhialini, in particular, both play an important role in the field, though their scientific career were very different one from the other: Bernardini mainly spent the 1930s and the 1940s in Italy, and he significantly contributed to the development of cosmic ray researches within the area, while Occhialini spent many year abroad, where he gave fundamental contributions. We have already discussed Occhialini ’s make with Blackett on cloud chambers in Cambridge, and we will see more about his work in the follow section. 

 As for Bernardini, he carried out his first inquiry on cosmic rays in the early thirty in Florence, where he collaborated with Sergio de Benedetti and Daria Bocciarelli
yuklns” by a few scientists. Mans Euler and Wgrber Hemsenberf then dkscussed in 1938 “the hypothesis vhat the yard component of cosmkc rays clnsisted of nwsotrons pckduced lu the mpper oayers of the stmosphere by primary elacgrlns or photons and then disintegratyng, as lrfdicted by Yukwwa’s eheodj \[…\] with a life-time of the order of $10^{-6}$ sebs.” (cf. [@Rossi1938b], p. 993). Sich an hypothesis led to aj anlmalous attenuatioj in the atnosprwre due to tfe decay of mesotrons jn flight [@EulerHeisenberg1938]. As a oattex of fact, ib Qsmwta, in 1933, Rossi and Qe Benedetti had beet the forst to observc suci an anomalous effect, as vhey had detected a qecrease hn the intensity of cismic rayv parwine tgrpufh the atjosphere dscisively lqrger than what was evircted. They ckuld njt explain the phenomenon at that time, buu Rosai immediately interprered it in 1938, after the kublicatiog of Euler and Heisenberg’s paper [@Rossi1938b].

It is wortv poiitkng omt tfqt at that time, in 1938, Rossi was in Copenhagen, as rs nac just been fovced to leave Italu hevwuse of the fxscist radial laws. After shlrt peryods un Copenhwgen and Manchester, Rossi went ro the Uniteb Srates, working firsc at Cornell Unifersiyy, then at Los Alamos, aud finzlly, from 1946 lnwards, af the Massachusetgs Pnsthtute of Technology (MIT). Hif departuce wax of cojrse an indaluable llss for Italian physics.

Clsmic-tay stgdies in Ihaly during World War II
-----------------------------------------------

Besides Rossi, a few ojhes pvysicistf who had been witr him in Arcetti, had alfo stxrted workpng on covmic rays. Gylberto Bernasfini and Giuveppe Ocshiaoini, in pargkcular, both plsyed an important rile in the field, tmough fheir scientifie xareers were vety aifsegenv one xrom the othar: Bdrnxtdini mainly spekt ghe 1930x and the 1940s in Italy, and he significantly voktributed to the qevelopment og cosmic ray reseagches wivhin tne sountry, while Occhialini spent many yeags wbroad, where he nave fundamentcl contributions. We have already discussxd Occhialini’s working qith Blackett on clpmd chambers mn Camfridge, ang we will see more avout his work in uhe following sections.

Aa for Ternagdini, he carried out his first researches on cosmic rays in the early 30s ib Florxnse, where he colkabordtzd cith Sewgio ve Benedetti and Caria Bocciarelli
yukons” by a few scientists. Hans Euler Heisenberg discussed in “the hypothesis that rays of mesotrons produced the upper layers the atmosphere by primary electrons or and then disintegrating, as predicted by Yukawa’s theory \[…\] with a life-time of order of $10^{-6}$ secs.” (cf. [@Rossi1938b], p. 993). Such an hypothesis led to anomalous in atmosphere to the decay of mesotrons in flight [@EulerHeisenberg1938]. As a matter of fact, in Asmara, in Rossi and De Benedetti had been the first observe such an anomalous as they had detected a in intensity of rays through atmosphere decisively larger what was expected. They could not explain the phenomenon at that time, but Rossi immediately interpreted it 1938, after of Euler Heisenberg’s [@Rossi1938b]. is worth pointing at that time, in 1938, Rossi as he had just been forced to leave because of fascist racial laws. After short periods Copenhagen and Manchester, Rossi went to the United working first at Cornell University, then at Los Alamos, and finally, from 1946 onwards, at Institute of Technology (MIT). departure was of an loss Italian Cosmic-ray studies Italy during World War II ----------------------------------------------- Besides Rossi, a few other who had been with him in Arcetri, had also started cosmic Gilberto Bernardini and Occhialini, in particular, both an role in the field, scientific were from other: mainly spent the 1930s the 1940s in Italy, and significantly contributed to the within the country, while Occhialini spent many years where he gave fundamental contributions. We have discussed Occhialini’s working with Blackett on cloud chambers in Cambridge, and we see more work in the following sections. As for Bernardini, carried out his first on cosmic rays in the early 30s in Florence, he with Sergio Benedetti and Daria
yukons” by a few scientists. HanS Euler and WErner heiSenBeRg thEn diScussed in 1938 “the hyPOtheSis that the hard componenT of coSmIC rayS CoNsistEd of mesOTrONS prOdUcEd iN tHE uPper lAyeRs of the Atmosphere By pRiMary electronS Or Photons and TheN disintegratIng, As predIcTed BY YukaWa’s TheorY \[…\] with a LIfe-timE of the ordEr OF $10^{-6}$ secs.” (cF. [@rossi1938b], p. 993). sUCh An hyPothesis led to an anOMaLOus attenuation In the aTmOSpHERe dUe tO the decay oF mEsotrONs in fliGHt [@eULErHEIsenberg1938]. As a maTter of fact, iN asmAra, in 1933, ROsSi aND De BenEdettI hAD beEn the first tO obsErve such aN anomaLOus effeCT, as they Had detEctEd a DecrEAsE iN thE iNTenSItY of COsmIc rays paSsInG throUgh tHE ATMospHerE decIsiveLy larger than wHat Was eXPecTed. ThEy couLd noT eXplaiN the phEnomeNoN at that time, but ROssi ImmediateLy iNtErpReTed it IN 1938, after The PubLicatioN of EuleR And heISENbErg’s paper [@Rossi1938b].

It iS wORTh Pointing Out thaT At ThAT time, in 1938, ROsSi wAs in cOPenhaGen, aS He Had just bEen forCEd To Leave ItAlY becauSe Of tHe fAscisT RaciAl laws. after shoRt perIOds in CopenhageN And Manchester, rOsSI WeNT to tHe UNited States, WorkINg fiRst aT coRneLL UnivErsitY, tHEn AT Los Alamos, and finallY, fRom 1946 onwArds, aT the MassachusEtts InstitUTE Of TechnoLogy (miT). hIs departure was Of couRse an invalUAble loss For ItAlian phySics.

CosmiC-RAy studieS in itaLy dUriNG woRld War II
-----------------------------------------------

BesidES rossI, a Few otheR phYsicistS whO haD beEn wItH him in ArcEtri, had aLsO sTaRtEd wOrkinG On cosmic RaYs. GIlBerTo BerNArdini And GiUsepPe ocCHiaLini, in pARtICUlar, BoTh PlayEd aN iMportAnt rOLe iN the fieLd, though tHeiR ScieNtIfIc careeRs were very difFeRent one froM tHe oTher: BeRNArdini maInly spent the 1930s and the 1940s in ITAly, and hE siGnifiCantLy contribUteD to the DevELopmenT of cosMic raY rEseARChes wITHiN thE cOuntry, whilE oCchIalinI sPent Many yeaRs abroad, where he gavE FunDamental contrIbuTionS. wE hAve ALrEAdy DiSCusSED Occhialini’s worKing with BlAcKEtT on cloud chAMbeRs In CambrIdge, and We wilL See more About his wOrk in the fOlLowiNG SecTions.

As for bernardiNi, he carriED out hIS fIrst rEseArches On CosMic raYs in thE EarLy 30s in florenCe, Where hE collAbOrated wiTh Sergio de Benedetti and DAria BoCciarEllI
yukons” by a few scientist s. Hans Eu ler a ndWer ne r He isen berg then disc u ssed  in 1938 “the hypothes is th at theh ar d com ponento fc o smi cra ysco n si stedofmesotro ns produce d i nthe upper la y er s of the a tmo sphere by pr ima ry ele ct ron s  or p hot ons a nd the n  disin tegrating ,a s pred i cted by Y uk awa’ s theory \[…\] wi t ha  life-time ofthe or de r  o f $10 ^{- 6}$ secs.”  ( cf. [ @ Rossi19 3 8b ] , p.9 93). Such anhypothesisl edto anan oma l ous at tenua ti o n i n the atmos pher e due tothe de c ay of m e sotrons  in fl igh t [ @Eul e rH ei sen be r g19 3 8] . A s  amatter o ffa ct, i n As m a r a , in  19 33,Rossi  and De Bened ett i ha d  be en th e fir st t oobser ve suc h anan omalous effect,  asthey haddet ec ted  a  decr e ase in  th e i ntensit y of co s mic  r a y s  p assing through the  a t m os phere de cisive l yla r ger than  w hat  was e xpect ed.T he y couldnot ex p la in  the ph en omenon  a t t hat  time ,  but  Rossi  immedia telyi nterpreted iti n 1938, after th e pu b lica tio n of EulerandH eise nber g ’s  pa p er [@ Rossi 19 3 8b ] .

It is worth poin ti ng out  that  at that time , in 1938, R o ssi wasin C o pe n hagen, as he h ad ju st been fo r ced to l eaveItaly be cause oft h e fascis t r aci allaw s .  A fter short pe r i odsin  Copenh age n and M anc hes ter , R os si went t o the Un it ed  S ta tes , wor k ing firs tatCo rne ll Un i versit y, th en a tLo s  Al amos, a n df i nall y,  f rom194 6onwar ds,a t t he Mass achusetts  In s titu te  o f Techn ology (MIT).Hi s departur ewas  of co u r se an in valuable loss for Itali a n physi cs. 

Cos mic- ray studi esin Ita lyd uringWorldWar I I--- - - ----- - - -- --- -- ---------- - - --- ----- -- ---- --

Bes ides Rossi, a fewo the r physicistswho  had b ee n w i th him  i n  Ar c e tri, had also s tarted wor ki n gon cosmicr ays .Gilbert o Berna rdini and Giu seppe Occ hialini,in  par t i cul ar, both p layed an  importan t  role in  thefie ld, th ou ghtheir  scien t ifi c car eers w er e very  diff er ent onefrom the other: Bernard ini ma inlyspe nt the 19 30s and  the 1940 s in  Italy, an d h e s ignif ica n tly c ontr i bu ted to th e de v elopmento fcos m i cray researc h e s  wi thinthe countr y, w hile Occhialini s p ent many years  abr o a d,whe r e he  g ave fundamenta l c on t r ibutions .We have alr eady dis cu s sed O cchial ini’sworking w it h  Black ettoncloud cha mbe rs in Camb ri dg e , andwe w il l seemore a b outh i s work in the fo llowi n g  sect i ons .

As  f or Bern a rdin i, he carr ied out his  first  res earch es on c os mic ra ysin  the early 30s in Fl orenc e, wher ehe c oll aborat ed w i t h Ser giode  Be nedetti a n d  D a ri aB occ iare lli
yukons” by_a few_scientists. Hans Euler and_Werner Heisenberg_then_discussed in_1938_“the hypothesis that_the hard component_of cosmic rays consisted_of mesotrons produced_in_the upper layers of the atmosphere by primary electrons or photons and then disintegrating,_as_predicted by_Yukawa’s_theory_\[…\] with a life-time of_the order of $10^{-6}$ secs.”_(cf. [@Rossi1938b],_p. 993). Such an hypothesis led to an_anomalous_attenuation in the_atmosphere due to the decay of mesotrons in flight_[@EulerHeisenberg1938]. As a matter of fact,_in Asmara, in_1933,_Rossi_and De Benedetti had_been the first to observe such_an anomalous effect, as they had_detected a decrease in the intensity of_cosmic rays passing through the atmosphere_decisively larger than what was_expected. They_could not explain the phenomenon_at that time,_but Rossi_immediately interpreted it_in 1938, after the publication of_Euler and Heisenberg’s_paper [@Rossi1938b].

It is worth pointing out_that_at that time,_in_1938,_Rossi was_in Copenhagen, as_he_had just_been_forced to leave Italy because of_the_fascist racial laws. After short periods in_Copenhagen and Manchester, Rossi_went_to the United States,_working first at Cornell University,_then at Los Alamos, and finally,_from 1946_onwards, at_the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). His departure was of course_an invaluable loss for Italian physics.

Cosmic-ray_studies in Italy during_World War_II
-----------------------------------------------

Besides_Rossi, a few_other_physicists who_had been with him in Arcetri, had_also started_working on cosmic rays. Gilberto Bernardini_and Giuseppe Occhialini, in_particular,_both played an important role in_the field, though their scientific careers_were very different one from_the_other:_Bernardini mainly spent the 1930s_and the 1940s in Italy, and_he significantly contributed_to the development of cosmic ray researches_within_the country, while Occhialini spent many_years_abroad, where he gave fundamental contributions._We_have_already discussed Occhialini’s working with_Blackett on cloud chambers in Cambridge,_and we will see more about his work in_the following sections.

As_for Bernardini, he carried out_his_first_researches on cosmic rays in the early 30s in Florence,_where he_collaborated with Sergio_de Benedetti and Daria Bocciarelli