 terms of this form by

$$\label{ecuacionenr3}
    \frac{d}{dt}\,v(t)=\, \Phi(v(t)).$$

This approach to the classical picture can be obviously extended to a more general setting. In fact, it seems natural to define a [*magnetic field*]{} on a $n(\geq 2)$-dimensional Riemannian manifold $(M,g)$, as a closed $2$-form $F$ on $M$. The [*Lorentz force*]{} of a magnetic background $(M,g,F)$ is defined to be the skew-symmetric operator, $\Phi$, given by

$$\label{operator}
g(\Phi(X),Y)=F(X,Y),$$

for any couple of vector fields $X,Y$ on $M$. Let us remark that $\Phi$ is metrically equivalent to $F$, so no information is lost when $\Phi$ is considered instead $F$. In classical terminology, it is said that $\Phi$ is obtained from $F$ by raising its second index, and $\Phi$ and $F$ are then said to be physically equivalent. On the other hand, there exists another operator $\Phi'$ defined from $F$ via $g$ in a similar way, namely $g(X,\Phi'(Y))=F(X,Y),$ but it is easily seen that $\Phi'=-\Phi$. So, the choice from among $\Phi$ or $\Phi'$ to represent $F,$ using $g$, is not relevant. Along this paper, we will use $\Phi$ to denote the Lorentz force induced from $(M,g,F)$.

A (smooth) curve $\gamma$ in $(M,g)$ is called a [*flowline*]{} of the dynamical system associated with the magnetic field $F$ (or simply a flowline of $F,$ or a [*magnetic curve*]{} of $(M,g,F)$), if its velocity vector field, $\gamma^{\prime}$, satisfies the following (Landau-Hall) differential equation,

$$\nabla_{\gamma^{\prime}} \gamma^{\prime}=\Phi(\gamma^{\prime}),
\eqno{\rm(LH)}$$

where $\nabla$ is the Levi-Civita connection of $g$ \[compare with Eq. (\[ecuacionenr3\])\].

For the trivial magnetic field, $F=0$, the case without the force of a magnetic field, magnetic curves correspond
terms of this form by 

 $ $ \label{ecuacionenr3 } 
     \frac{d}{dt}\,v(t)=\, \Phi(v(t)).$$ 

 This approach to the classical movie can be obviously unfold to a more general setting. In fact, it seems lifelike to define a [ * magnetic field * ] { } on a $ n(\geq 2)$-dimensional Riemannian manifold $ (M, g)$, as a close $ 2$-form $ F$ on $ M$. The [ * Lorentz force * ] { } of a magnetic background $ (M, g, F)$ is defined to be the skew - symmetric hustler, $ \Phi$, given by 

 $ $ \label{operator } 
 g(\Phi(X),Y)=F(X, Y),$$ 

 for any couple of vector fields $ X, Y$ on $ M$. Let us remark that $ \Phi$ is metrically equivalent to $ F$, so no data is lost when $ \Phi$ is considered alternatively $ F$. In classical terminology, it is said that $ \Phi$ is obtain from $ F$ by raising its second index, and $ \Phi$ and $ F$ are then said to be physically equivalent. On the early hand, there exists another hustler $ \Phi'$ defined from $ F$ via $ g$ in a like way, namely $ g(X,\Phi'(Y))=F(X, Y),$ but it is well seen that $ \Phi'=-\Phi$. So, the choice from among $ \Phi$ or $ \Phi'$ to represent $ F,$ use $ g$, is not relevant. Along this paper, we will use $ \Phi$ to denote the Lorentz force induced from $ (M, g, F)$. 

 A (legato) curve $ \gamma$ in $ (M, g)$ is called a [ * flowline * ] { } of the dynamical system associated with the magnetic field $ F$ (or simply a flowline of $ F,$ or a [ * magnetic curve * ] { } of $ (M, g, F)$), if its speed vector battlefield, $ \gamma^{\prime}$, satisfies the stick to (Landau - Hall) differential equality, 

 $ $ \nabla_{\gamma^{\prime } } \gamma^{\prime}=\Phi(\gamma^{\prime }), 
 \eqno{\rm(LH)}$$ 

 where $ \nabla$ is the Levi - Civita joining of $ g$ \[compare with Eq. (\[ecuacionenr3\])\ ]. 

 For the trivial magnetic discipline, $ F=0 $, the shell without the force of a magnetic airfield, magnetic curves correspond
 tegms of this form by

$$\label{tcuacionenr3}
    \frcx{d}{dt}\,v(t)=\, \Phi(v(t)).$$

Fhis appfoach to the classical pictuce cqn be obviously extended to a more gvneral sertinj. In fact, it seems natural to scfine e [*magnetic fielc*]{} on a $n(\gex 2)$-dimensional Sidmcnnian manifold $(M,g)$, as a closed $2$-form $S$ on $M$. Yhf [*Lorentz forcg*]{} of s maghvtlc background $(M,g,F)$ is defined to ge the vkew-symmetric operator, $\Phi$, given by

$$\labep{opegator}
g(\Phi(X),Y)=F(X,Y),$$

for wny couple if vqxtor fields $B,Y$ on $M$. Leu bs remark tgat $\Phi$ is metrically equivaleng to $Y$, so no infirnatlmn is lost xhen $\Pri$ is considcged insdead $F$. On classical tcrminmloty, it is said that $\Phm$ is obtained from $F$ by raisitg its second index, abd $\Phh$ ang $F$ xee gheh xajd to he 'hysically squivalent. In the other hand, tnewv exists anotger opqrwtor $\Phi'$ defined from $F$ via $g$ in a siminar way, namely $g(X,\Phi'(Y))=F(X,Y),$ byt it is easily seen jhat $\Phi'=-\Phy$. So, the choice from among $\Phi$ or $\Phi'$ to represend $F,$ uakng $g$, kw jot relevant. Along this paper, we will use $\Phi$ fo dvnote the Lorentz force induvef gtom $(M,g,F)$.

A (smootf) curvz $\gzmma$ in $(M,g)$ is callfd a [*fljwlinw*]{} of the qynakical system associated wity the magnetpc fueld $F$ (or simply a flowline oy $F,$ or a [*mabnetic curve*]{} of $(M,g,F)$), if nts vemocity vectlr field, $\fxmma^{\prime}$, satisfkes tve following (Landau-Hall) disferentiao eqbation,

$$\nacla_{\gsmma^{\pryme}} \gamma^{\pgime}=\Pmh(\gamma^{\prime}),
\eqno{\rm(LJ)}$$

wherg $\nabld$ is the Lfvi-Civita connection of $g$ \[compacx with Eq. (\[ecuschonvnr3\])\].

For thz trivlal magnetic fiqld, $F=0$, the case withouc the worce of a magnetmc field, maggetic curves wlrrespond
terms of this form by $$\label{ecuacionenr3} \frac{d}{dt}\,v(t)=\, approach the classical can be obviously setting. fact, it seems to define a field*]{} on a $n(\geq 2)$-dimensional Riemannian $(M,g)$, as a closed $2$-form $F$ on $M$. The [*Lorentz force*]{} of a background $(M,g,F)$ is defined to be the skew-symmetric operator, $\Phi$, given by $$\label{operator} for couple vector $X,Y$ on $M$. Let us remark that $\Phi$ is metrically equivalent to $F$, so no information lost when $\Phi$ is considered instead $F$. In terminology, it is said $\Phi$ is obtained from $F$ raising second index, $\Phi$ $F$ then said to physically equivalent. On the other hand, there exists another operator $\Phi'$ defined from $F$ via $g$ in similar way, but it easily that So, the choice $\Phi$ or $\Phi'$ to represent $F,$ not relevant. Along this paper, we will use to denote Lorentz force induced from $(M,g,F)$. A curve $\gamma$ in $(M,g)$ is called a [*flowline*]{} the dynamical system associated with the magnetic field $F$ (or simply a flowline of $F,$ [*magnetic curve*]{} of $(M,g,F)$), its velocity vector $\gamma^{\prime}$, the (Landau-Hall) equation, $$\nabla_{\gamma^{\prime}} \eqno{\rm(LH)}$$ where $\nabla$ is the Levi-Civita connection of $g$ \[compare with (\[ecuacionenr3\])\]. For the trivial magnetic field, $F=0$, the case without of magnetic field, magnetic correspond
 terms of this form by

$$\label{ecuAcionenr3}
    \frAc{d}{dt}\,V(t)=\, \PHi(v(T)).$$

THis aPproAch to the classiCAl piCture can be obviously extEnded To A More GEnEral sEtting. IN FaCT, It sEeMs NatUrAL tO defiNe a [*MagnetiC field*]{} on a $n(\Geq 2)$-DiMensional RieMAnNian manifoLd $(M,G)$, as a closed $2$-foRm $F$ On $M$. The [*loRenTZ forcE*]{} of A magnEtic baCKgrounD $(M,g,F)$ is defInED to be tHE skew-syMMEtRic oPerator, $\Phi$, given by

$$\LAbEL{operator}
g(\Phi(X),y)=F(X,Y),$$

foR aNY cOUPle Of vEctor fieldS $X,y$ on $M$. LET us remaRK tHAT $\phi$ IS metrically eqUivalent to $F$, SO no InformAtIon IS lost wHen $\PhI$ iS ConSidered instEad $F$. in classicAl termINology, iT Is said tHat $\Phi$ Is oBtaIned FRoM $F$ By rAiSIng ITs SecONd iNdex, and $\PHi$ AnD $F$ are Then SAID To be PhySicaLly eqUivalent. On the OthEr haND, thEre exIsts aNothEr OperaTor $\Phi'$ DefinEd From $F$ via $g$ in a simIlar Way, namely $G(X,\PHi'(y))=F(X,y),$ bUt it iS Easily SeeN thAt $\Phi'=-\PhI$. So, the cHOicE fROM AmOng $\Phi$ or $\Phi'$ to repreSeNT $f,$ uSing $g$, is nOt releVAnT. ALOng this pApEr, wE wilL USe $\Phi$ To deNOtE the LoreNtz forCE iNdUced froM $(M,G,F)$.

A (smoOtH) cuRve $\Gamma$ IN $(M,g)$ iS calleD a [*flowliNe*]{} of tHE dynamical systEM associated wiTH tHE MaGNetiC fiEld $F$ (or simplY a flOWlinE of $F,$ OR a [*MagNEtic cUrve*]{} oF $(M,G,f)$), iF Its velocity vector fiElD, $\gamma^{\Prime}$, Satisfies the fOllowing (LaNDAU-Hall) difFereNTiAL equation,

$$\nabla_{\Gamma^{\Prime}} \gamma^{\PRime}=\Phi(\gAmma^{\pRime}),
\eqno{\Rm(LH)}$$

where $\NABla$ is the levI-CiVitA coNNEcTion of $g$ \[comparE WIth EQ. (\[eCuacionEnr3\])\].

for the tRivIal MagNetIc Field, $F=0$, the Case withOuT tHe FoRce Of a maGNetic fieLd, MagNeTic CurveS CorresPond
 terms of this form by

$$ \label{ecu acion enr 3}   \f rac{ d}{dt}\,v(t)=\ ,  \Ph i(v(t)).$$

This appro ach t ot he c l as sical  pictur e  c a n  be  o bv iou sl y  e xtend edto a mo re general  se tt ing. In fact ,  i t seems na tur al to define  a[*magn et icf ield* ]{}  on a  $n(\g e q 2)$- dimension al Rieman n ian man i f ol d $( M,g)$, as a close d  $ 2 $-form $F$ on$M$. T he [* L o ren tzforce*]{}of  a ma g netic b a ck g r o und $(M,g,F)$ isdefined tob e t he ske w- sym m etricopera to r , $ \Phi$, give n by 

$$\labe l{oper a tor}
g( \ Phi(X), Y)=F(X ,Y) ,$$ 

fo r  a ny  co up l e o f  v ect o r f ields $X ,Y $on $M $. L e t u s re mar k th at $\ Phi$ is metri cal ly e q uiv alent  to $ F$,so  no i nforma tionis  lost when $\Ph i$ i s conside red  i nst ea d $F$ .  In cl ass ica l termi nology, itis s a id  that $\Phi$ is ob ta i n ed  from $F $ by r a is in g  its sec on d i ndex , and $ \Phi $  a nd $F$ a re the n  s ai d to be  p hysica ll y e qui valen t . On  the o ther han d, th e re exists anot h er operator $ \ Ph i ' $d efin edfrom $F$ vi a $g $  ina si m il arw ay, n amely  $ g (X , \Phi'(Y))=F(X,Y),$bu t it i s eas ily seen that  $\Phi'=-\ P h i $. So, t he c h oi c e from among $ \Phi$  or $\Phi' $  to repr esent  $F,$ us ing $g$,i s  not rel eva nt.  Al ong t hi s paper, we w i l l us e$\Phi$todenotethe  Lo ren tzfo rce induc ed from$( M, g, F) $.
A (s m ooth) cu rv e $ \g amm a$ in $(M,g) $ iscall ed  a [*f lowline * ]{ } of t he  d ynam ica lsyste m as s oci ated wi th the ma gne t ic f ie ld  $F$ (o r simply a fl ow line of $F ,$  or  a [*m a g netic cu rve*]{} of $(M,g,F)$),i f its v elo cityvect or field,  $\ gamma^ {\p r ime}$,  satis fiesth e f o l lowin g (L and au -Hall) dif f e ren tialeq uati on,

$$ \nabla_{\gamma^{\p r ime }} \gamma^{\p rim e}=\ P h i( \ga m ma ^ {\p ri m e}) , \eqno{\rm(LH)}$ $

where $ \n a bl a$ is theL evi -C ivita c onnecti on of $g$ \[c ompare wi th Eq. (\ [e cuac i o nen r3\])\].
For thetrivial m a gneti c  f ield,  $F =0$, t he  ca se wi thoutt heforce  of ama gnetic  fiel d,  magneti c curves correspond
 terms_of this_form by

$$\label{ecuacionenr3}
  _ \frac{d}{dt}\,v(t)=\,_\Phi(v(t)).$$

This_approach to_the_classical picture can_be obviously extended_to a more general_setting. In fact,_it_seems natural to define a [*magnetic field*]{} on a $n(\geq 2)$-dimensional Riemannian manifold $(M,g)$,_as_a closed_$2$-form_$F$_on $M$. The [*Lorentz force*]{}_of a magnetic background $(M,g,F)$_is defined_to be the skew-symmetric operator, $\Phi$, given by

$$\label{operator}
g(\Phi(X),Y)=F(X,Y),$$

for_any_couple of vector_fields $X,Y$ on $M$. Let us remark that $\Phi$_is metrically equivalent to $F$, so_no information is_lost_when_$\Phi$ is considered instead_$F$. In classical terminology, it is_said that $\Phi$ is obtained from_$F$ by raising its second index, and_$\Phi$ and $F$ are then said_to be physically equivalent. On_the other_hand, there exists another operator_$\Phi'$ defined from_$F$ via_$g$ in a_similar way, namely $g(X,\Phi'(Y))=F(X,Y),$ but it_is easily seen_that $\Phi'=-\Phi$. So, the choice from_among_$\Phi$ or $\Phi'$_to_represent_$F,$ using_$g$, is not_relevant._Along this_paper,_we will use $\Phi$ to denote_the_Lorentz force induced from $(M,g,F)$.

A (smooth) curve_$\gamma$ in $(M,g)$ is_called_a [*flowline*]{} of the_dynamical system associated with the_magnetic field $F$ (or simply a_flowline of_$F,$ or_a [*magnetic curve*]{} of $(M,g,F)$), if its velocity vector field, $\gamma^{\prime}$,_satisfies the following (Landau-Hall) differential equation,

$$\nabla_{\gamma^{\prime}}_\gamma^{\prime}=\Phi(\gamma^{\prime}),
\eqno{\rm(LH)}$$

where $\nabla$ is the_Levi-Civita connection_of_$g$ \[compare with_Eq._(\[ecuacionenr3\])\].

For the_trivial magnetic field, $F=0$, the case without_the force_of a magnetic field, magnetic curves_correspond