nabla \phi}{{\left \lvert \nabla \phi \right \rvert}} \right) \cdot \nabla \phi = 0.$ Note that $\nabla \phi/ {\left \lvert \nabla \phi \right \rvert}$ is a unit vector which is normal to the level contour $\Gamma(t)$. Thus, locally, this equation models advection in the direction normal to $\Gamma(t)$ with velocity $v(x)$. This causes $\Gamma(t)$ to deform with normal velocity $v(x)$. With this in mind, one can view $\Gamma(t)$ as the set of points which could be reached after walking inward from the boundary for a time $t$ with normal velocity $v(x)$. For example, if $v(x) \equiv 1$, then for $t > 0$, the curve $\Gamma(t)$ is the set of points a distance $t$ from the original curve.

This procedure is shown in figure \[fig:levelSetExample\]. Figure \[fig:distEx\] shows the boundary of a region defined by $(x(\theta),y(\theta)) = (\cos(\theta),\sin(\theta)+\sin(3\theta)/2)$ and a series of contours of points accessible after traveling a certain time from the boundary. Figure \[fig:initFun\] shows the graph of the level set function and with the same level sets overlaid on the surface. This example also displays one of the strengths of the level set method. Depending on the original curve, the the level contours may break apart into disconnected pieces or merge into into a single piece. More primitive methods for curve evolution (many of which involve tracking points along the curve) have trouble handling these changes in topology but the level set method accounts for them with no special considerations. For more information regarding level set methods, see @osher2003level.

[0.35]{}![image](distancePicture.pdf){width="\textwidth"}

 

[0.45]{}![image](initialFunction.png){width="\textwidth"}

Illegal Deforestation {#sec:model}
=====================

Our model for the actions of illegal extractors committing crimes in protected regions is based on @Albers, as described in section \[sec:albersmodel\]. They derived a game-theoretic model for illegal deforestation in an idealized setting, assuming the protected region was circular to significantly simplify the problem, and neglecting the effects of terrain. We wish
nabla \phi}{{\left \lvert \nabla \phi \right \rvert } } \right) \cdot \nabla \phi = 0.$ Note that $ \nabla \phi/ { \left \lvert \nabla \phi \right \rvert}$ is a unit vector which is normal to the level contour $ \Gamma(t)$. therefore, locally, this equality model advection in the direction normal to $ \Gamma(t)$ with velocity $ v(x)$. This induce $ \Gamma(t)$ to deform with normal velocity $ v(x)$. With this in thinker, one can watch $ \Gamma(t)$ as the set of point which could be reached after walking in from the boundary for a time $ t$ with normal velocity $ v(x)$. For example, if $ v(x) \equiv 1 $, then for $ triiodothyronine > 0 $, the curve $ \Gamma(t)$ is the hardening of points a distance $ t$ from the original curve. 

 This operation is shown in figure \[fig: levelSetExample\ ]. Figure \[fig: distEx\ ] show the boundary of a region defined by $ (x(\theta),y(\theta) ) = (\cos(\theta),\sin(\theta)+\sin(3\theta)/2)$ and a series of contour of points accessible after traveling a certain time from the boundary. calculate \[fig: initFun\ ] shows the graph of the level set function and with the same level sets overlaid on the surface. This example also displays one of the strengths of the level set method. Depending on the original curvature, the the level contours may demote aside into disconnected pieces or merge into into a single piece. More primitive methods for curve development (many of which involve tracking points along the curve) have trouble handling these changes in topology but the level set method report for them with no special retainer. For more information regarding level set methods, determine @osher2003level. 

 [ 0.35]{}![image](distancePicture.pdf){width="\textwidth " } 

 

 [ 0.45]{}![image](initialFunction.png){width="\textwidth " } 

 Illegal Deforestation { # sec: model } 
 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 

 Our model for the actions of illegal cartridge extractor committing crimes in protected regions is base on @Albers, as described in section \[sec: albersmodel\ ]. They deduce a game - theoretical model for illegal deforestation in an idealized setting, assuming the protected area was circular to significantly simplify the problem, and neglect the effects of terrain. We wish
nabpa \phi}{{\left \lvert \nabla \pmi \right \rvert}} \rntht) \cdmt \nabma \phi = 0.$ Note that $\nabla \phi/ {\left \lvxrt \babla \phi \right \rvert}$ is a jnit vectlr which is iormal to the letsl contour $\Gajla(t)$. Chns, locally, this equation kodels advectimn iu the direction normal to $\Gamma(t)$ witr velocotj $v(x)$. This causgs $\Gakia(t)$ fo deform with normal velocity $v(x)$. Sith thps in mind, one cam view $\Gamma(t)$ as the set ov polnts which could bf reached adter qalking inwafd from tht youndary fot a time $t$ with normal velocity $x(x)$. Fox example, id $c(x) \fxuiv 1$, then hor $t > 0$, the curve $\Nsmma(t)$ hs the xet of points s dmstabce $t$ from the originel curve.

This procedute is showt nn figure \[fig:levelSetWxqmple\]. Figgre \[wug:dkstTx\] xhkws thf bkundary of a region dwfined by $(x(\theta),y(\thtta)) = (\cos(\theta),\sin(\tgeta)+\sig(3\treta)/2)$ and a series of contours of points acdessible after travelint a certain time from the bounqary. Figure \[fig:initFun\] shows the graph of the leval sev wuneblon xbd with the same level sets overlaid on the surszct. Tmis example also displays ome og the strengthr of tks mevel set method. Dfpendind on rhe origigal vurve, the the level contourw may break cpaet into disconnectzd pieces or merbe inyo into a single piece. Oore primitive lethods fkf curve evolutiov (msnf of which involve trackind points elong the cufve) nave twouble hanfling these changes in tlpoloyy bud the levep set method accounts for them xmth no speciak wonvideratijns. Fpr more inforiation regardiug level set oethods, sev @osher2003letel.

[0.35]{}![image](distwncePicture.pdx){aidth="\textwidvh"}

 

[0.45]{}![image](inytiaoFunxtion.pne){didth="\textwidth"}

Ollegal Dvfjresration {#sec:model}
=====================

Our moasl for the actiins of illegal exttacgorf bomkieding crimes hn pfotdvted fegions is nasdd om @Albers, as describeg in section \[sec:alberskoqel\]. They derived a game-theoreyic model for illehal dxforesvation in an idealized setting, assuming the protfctcd region was cirgulat to signifncantly simplify the problem, and neglectmng the effects of tertain. We wish
nabla \phi}{{\left \lvert \nabla \phi \right \rvert}} \nabla = 0.$ that $\nabla \phi/ \rvert}$ a unit vector is normal to level contour $\Gamma(t)$. Thus, locally, this models advection in the direction normal to $\Gamma(t)$ with velocity $v(x)$. This causes to deform with normal velocity $v(x)$. With this in mind, one can view as set points could be reached after walking inward from the boundary for a time $t$ with normal velocity For example, if $v(x) \equiv 1$, then for > 0$, the curve is the set of points distance from the curve. procedure shown in figure Figure \[fig:distEx\] shows the boundary of a region defined by $(x(\theta),y(\theta)) = (\cos(\theta),\sin(\theta)+\sin(3\theta)/2)$ and a series of of points traveling a time the Figure \[fig:initFun\] shows of the level set function and level sets overlaid on the surface. This example displays one the strengths of the level set Depending on the original curve, the the level may break apart into disconnected pieces or merge into into a single piece. More primitive curve evolution (many of involve tracking points the have handling changes in but the level set method accounts for them with no special For more information regarding level set methods, see @osher2003level. [0.35]{}![image](distancePicture.pdf){width="\textwidth"} Deforestation ===================== Our model the actions of illegal committing in protected regions is @Albers, described They a model for illegal deforestation an idealized setting, assuming the region was circular to neglecting the effects of terrain. We wish
nabla \phi}{{\left \lvert \nabla \phi \Right \rvert}} \Right) \CdoT \naBlA \phi = 0.$ note That $\nabla \phi/ {\leFT \lveRt \nabla \phi \right \rvert}$ is A unit VeCTor wHIcH is noRmal to tHE lEVEl cOnToUr $\GAmMA(t)$. thus, lOcaLly, this Equation moDelS aDvection in thE DiRection norMal To $\Gamma(t)$ with VelOcity $v(X)$. THis CAuses $\gamMa(t)$ to Deform WIth norMal velociTy $V(X)$. With tHIs in minD, ONe Can vIew $\Gamma(t)$ as the set OF pOInts which could Be reacHeD AfTER waLkiNg inward frOm The boUNdary foR A tIME $T$ wiTH normal velociTy $v(x)$. For examPLe, iF $v(x) \equIv 1$, TheN For $t > 0$, thE curvE $\GAMma(T)$ is the set of PoinTs a distanCe $t$ froM The origINal curvE.

This pRocEduRe is SHoWn In fIgURe \[fIG:lEveLsetexample\]. FIgUrE \[fig:dIstEX\] SHOWs thE boUndaRy of a Region defined By $(x(\ThetA),Y(\thEta)) = (\coS(\thetA),\sin(\ThEta)+\siN(3\theta)/2)$ And a sErIes of contours of PoinTs accessiBle AfTer TrAveliNG a certAin TimE from thE boundaRY. FiGuRE \[FIg:InitFun\] shows the graPh OF ThE level seT functIOn AnD With the sAmE leVel sETS overLaid ON tHe surfacE. This eXAmPlE also diSpLays onE oF thE stRengtHS of tHe leveL set methOd. DepENding on the origINal curve, the thE LeVEL cONtouRs mAy break aparT intO DiscOnneCTeD piECes or Merge InTO iNTo a single piece. More pRiMitive MethoDs for curve evoLution (many OF WHich invoLve tRAcKIng points along The cuRve) have troUBle handlIng thEse changEs in topolOGY but the lEveL seT meThoD ACcOunts for them wITH no sPeCial conSidErationS. FoR moRe iNfoRmAtion regaRding levEl SeT mEtHodS, see @oSHer2003level.

[0.35]{}![ImAge](DiStaNcePiCTure.pdF){widtH="\texTwIdTH"}

 

[0.45]{}![imAge](initIAlfUNctiOn.PnG){widTh="\tExTwidtH"}

IllEGal deforesTation {#sec:ModEL}
=====================

Our MoDeL for the Actions of illeGaL extractorS cOmmItting CRImes in prOtected regions is based on @aLbers, as DesCribeD in sEction \[sec:AlbErsmodEl\]. THEy deriVed a gaMe-theOrEtiC MOdel fOR IlLegAl DeforestatION in An ideAlIzed Setting, Assuming the protectED reGion was circulAr tO sigNIFiCanTLy SImpLiFY thE PRoblem, and neglecTing the effEcTS oF terrain. We WIsh
nabla \phi}{{\left \lvert\nabla \ph i \ri ght  \r ve rt}}  \ri ght) \cdot \na b la \ phi = 0.$ Note that $\ nabla  \ p hi/{ \l eft \ lvert \ n ab l a  \p hi  \ rig ht \r vert} $ i s a uni t vector w hic his normal to th e level co nto ur $\Gamma(t )$.  Thus,  l oca l ly, t his  equa tion m o dels a dvectionin the di r ectionn o rm al t o $\Gamma(t)$ wit h  v e locity $v(x)$.  Thisca u se s $\G amm a(t)$ to d ef orm w i th norm a lv e l oci t y $v(x)$. Wit h this in m i nd,  one c an  vi e w $\Ga mma(t )$ asthe set ofpoin ts whichcouldb e reach e d after  walki nginw ardf ro mthe  b o und a ry  fo r  atime $t$  w it h nor malv e l o city  $v (x)$ . For  example, if$v( x) \ e qui v 1$,  then  for  $ t > 0 $, the  curv e$\Gamma(t)$ istheset of po int sa d is tance $t$ fr omthe  origin al curv e .
Th i s pr ocedure is shown i nf i gu re \[fig :level S et Ex a mple\].Fi gur e \[ f i g:dis tEx\ ]  s hows the  bound a ry  o f a reg io n defi ne d b y $ (x(\t h eta) ,y(\th eta)) =(\cos ( \theta),\sin(\ t heta)+\sin(3\ t he t a )/ 2 )$ a nda series of  con t ours  ofp oi nts acces sible  a f te r  traveling a certai ntime f rom t he boundary.Figure \[f i g : initFun\ ] sh o ws the graph of t he le vel set fu n ction an d wit h the sa me levels e ts overl aid  on  th e s u r fa ce. This exam p l e al so  displa ysone ofthe  st ren gth sof the le vel setme th od .Dep endin g  on theor igi na l c urve, the th e lev el c on to u rsmay bre a ka p artin to  dis con ne ctedpiec e s o r merge  into int o a sing le  p iece. M ore primitive  m ethods for  c urv e evol u t ion (man y of which involve trac k ing poi nts  alon g th e curve)hav e trou ble handli ng the se ch an ges i n top o l og y b ut  the level s etmetho dacco unts fo r them with no spe c ial  consideratio ns.  For m or e i n fo r mat io n  re g a rding level set  methods,se e  @ osher2003l e vel .
[0.35] {}![ima ge](d i stanceP icture.pd f){width= "\ text w i dth "}

 

[0. 45]{}![i mage](ini t ialFu n ct ion.p ng) {width =" \te xtwid th"}
I lle gal D efores ta tion { #sec: mo del}
=== ==================

Our  model  forthe  actionsofi lle gal extra ctor s committi ngcri mes i n p r otect ed r e gi ons is ba sedo n @Albers ,  a s d e s cr ibed in sec t i o n \ [sec: alb e rsmode l\].  They derived a g a me-theoretic m odel f orill e galde forestation in  an  i d e alized s et ting, assum ing thepr o tecte d regi on was  circul a r  t o  signi fica ntl y simplif y t he problem ,an d  negle ctin gthe ef fectso f te r r ain. We wish
nabla \phi}{{\left_\lvert \nabla_\phi \right \rvert}} \right)_\cdot \nabla_\phi_= 0.$_Note_that $\nabla \phi/_{\left \lvert \nabla_\phi \right \rvert}$ is_a unit vector_which_is normal to the level contour $\Gamma(t)$. Thus, locally, this equation models advection in_the_direction normal_to_$\Gamma(t)$_with velocity $v(x)$. This causes_$\Gamma(t)$ to deform with normal_velocity $v(x)$._With this in mind, one can view $\Gamma(t)$_as_the set of_points which could be reached after walking inward from_the boundary for a time $t$_with normal velocity_$v(x)$._For_example, if $v(x) \equiv_1$, then for $t > 0$,_the curve $\Gamma(t)$ is the set_of points a distance $t$ from the_original curve.

This procedure is shown in_figure \[fig:levelSetExample\]. Figure \[fig:distEx\] shows_the boundary_of a region defined by_$(x(\theta),y(\theta)) = (\cos(\theta),\sin(\theta)+\sin(3\theta)/2)$_and a_series of contours_of points accessible after traveling a_certain time from_the boundary. Figure \[fig:initFun\] shows the_graph_of the level_set_function_and with_the same level_sets_overlaid on_the_surface. This example also displays one_of_the strengths of the level set method._Depending on the original_curve,_the the level contours_may break apart into disconnected_pieces or merge into into a_single piece._More primitive_methods for curve evolution (many of which involve tracking points along_the curve) have trouble handling these_changes in topology but_the level_set_method accounts for_them_with no_special considerations. For more information regarding level_set methods,_see @osher2003level.

[0.35]{}![image](distancePicture.pdf){width="\textwidth"}

 

[0.45]{}![image](initialFunction.png){width="\textwidth"}

Illegal Deforestation {#sec:model}
=====================

Our model for_the actions of illegal_extractors_committing crimes in protected regions is_based on @Albers, as described in_section \[sec:albersmodel\]. They derived a_game-theoretic_model_for illegal deforestation in an_idealized setting, assuming the protected region_was circular to_significantly simplify the problem, and neglecting the_effects_of terrain. We wish