 cases, we initialized with a simple interpolation of each spectral channel by bicubic splines.

Quality Assessment Indices
--------------------------

For simulated data, the spatial and spectral consistency of the fused products with respect to the ground-truth images are numerically evaluated by means of several quality assessment indices. Let $\u^R=\left(u_1^R, \ldots, u_C^R\right)$ be the high-resolution reference multispectral image and let us use the same notations than in Section \[sec:numerics\]. We employ the following quality indices for the evaluation of the pansharpening techniques:

-   The [*Root Mean Squared Error*]{} (RMSE) is one of the most popular measures that accounts for spatial distortion. It is computed as $$\text{RMSE}\left(u^R_k, u_k\right) = \sqrt{\dfrac{1}{|I|}\sum_{\p\in I} \left(u_k^R(\p) - u_k(\p)\right)}, \quad \forall \,k\in\{1,\ldots, C\},$$ and its optimal value is zero. We shall calculate this measure for each band and average the results over all bands to obtain a global value.

-   The [*Erreur Relative Globale Adimensionelle de Synth[è]{}se*]{} (ERGAS) proposed by Ranchin and Wald [@RanchinWald2000] is an index that gives a global quality assessment of the fused product. It is defined as $$\text{ERGAS} = \dfrac{100}{s} \sqrt{\dfrac{1}{C} \sum_{k=1}^C \left( \dfrac{\text{RMSE}\left(u^R_k, u_k\right)}{\mu_{u_k^R}}\right)^2},$$ where $s$ is the sampling factor and $\mu_{u_k^R}$ is the mean value of the $k$th spectral component of the reference image. Since the ERGAS is composed by a sum of RMSE, its optimal value is zero.

-   The [*Spectral Angle Mapper*]{} (SAM) introduced by Alparone [*et al.*]{} [@AlparoneBaronti2004] is a measure of spectral quality computed in the space defined by considering each channel as a coordinate axis. Mathematically, it is written as the absolute
cases, we initialized with a simple interpolation of each apparitional distribution channel by bicubic splines. 

 Quality Assessment Indices 
 -------------------------- 

 For simulated datum, the spatial and spectral consistency of the fuse products with respect to the background - truth images are numerically measure by means of several timbre assessment indices. Let $ \u^R=\left(u_1^R, \ldots, u_C^R\right)$ be the high - settlement reference multispectral image and let us use the same notation than in Section \[sec: numerics\ ]. We employ the following quality index for the evaluation of the pansharpening techniques: 

 -    The [ * Root Mean Squared Error * ] { } (RMSE) is one of the most popular measures that account for spatial distortion. It is computed as $ $ \text{RMSE}\left(u^R_k, u_k\right) = \sqrt{\dfrac{1}{|I|}\sum_{\p\in I } \left(u_k^R(\p) - u_k(\p)\right) }, \quad \forall \,k\in\{1,\ldots, C\},$$ and its optimal value is zero. We shall calculate this measurement for each band and average the results over all bands to obtain a global value. 

 -    The [ * Erreur Relative Globale Adimensionelle de Synth[è]{}se * ] { } (ERGAS) nominate by Ranchin and Wald [ @RanchinWald2000 ] is an exponent that gives a global quality assessment of the fused product. It is defined as $ $ \text{ERGAS } = \dfrac{100}{s } \sqrt{\dfrac{1}{C } \sum_{k=1}^C \left (\dfrac{\text{RMSE}\left(u^R_k, u_k\right)}{\mu_{u_k^R}}\right)^2},$$ where $ s$ is the sample factor and $ \mu_{u_k^R}$ is the average value of the $ k$th spectral part of the reference point prototype. Since the ERGAS is composed by a sum of RMSE, its optimal value is zero. 

 -    The [ * Spectral Angle Mapper * ] { } (SAM) introduced by Alparone [ * et al. * ] { } [ @AlparoneBaronti2004 ] is a measure of spectral quality calculate in the space defined by considering each channel as a coordinate axis. Mathematically, it is written as the absolute
 cades, we initialized with x simple interpolation of eadh spectfal channel by bicubic splinxs.

Quqlity Assessment Indices
--------------------------

For simulatef data, tye skatial and spectrem consistency lf tke fused productx with res[ect to the grmuvd-cruth images are numerically evaluatqd by mrajs of several zualptr asavswment indices. Let $\u^R=\left(u_1^R, \ldkts, u_C^R\gight)$ be the high-tesolution reference multidpechral image and let us use the samq notations tfan in Secuimn \[sec:numetics\]. We employ the following quauity nndices for tye fealuation oh the iansharpening techniqges:

-   Tne [*Root Mean Sauaced Wrror*]{} (RMSE) is one of vhe most popular meafures thad cccounts for spatial eiwtorthon. Ht ir coopuued aa $$\text{GMSX}\left(u^R_k, u_k\dight) = \sqrt{\efrac{1}{|I|}\sum_{\p\in I} \left(i_k^W(\i) - u_k(\p)\right)}, \qhad \fowajl \,k\in\{1,\ldots, C\},$$ and its optimal value is eero. Se shall calculate this measure for each banf and avewage the results over all bands to obtain a globan valne.

-   Uhc [*Derfur Relative Globale Adimensionelle de Synth[è]{}sq*]{} (ETGSS) proposed by Ranchin anc Aakq [@RanchinWald2000] is an insex that gives a gpobal qoality assessmegt og the fused product. It is dwfined as $$\teqt{ERTAS} = \dfrac{100}{s} \sqrt{\dfxac{1}{C} \sum_{k=1}^C \lzft( \dftac{\texy{RMSE}\left(u^R_k, u_k\right)}{\mu_{u_y^R}}\rifht)^2},$$ where $s$ is the szopling factor ana $\ml_{u_k^R}$ is the mean value of the $h$th spectcal cpmponeng of the rqference ilage. Since the ERGAS is fompodeg by a sum of RMSE, its optimal value is zxco.

-   The [*Specjran Atgle Map'er*]{} (SAK) introduced fy Alparone [*et al.*]{} [@AlpcroneBxronti2004] is z measuce of spectrwl quality cokkuted in the vpace desinee by considdfing each chanmel as a bojrdibate axis. Mathematlcalli, jt is written aw tye absolute
cases, we initialized with a simple interpolation spectral by bicubic Quality Assessment Indices spatial spectral consistency of fused products with to the ground-truth images are numerically by means of several quality assessment indices. Let $\u^R=\left(u_1^R, \ldots, u_C^R\right)$ be the reference multispectral image and let us use the same notations than in Section We the quality for the evaluation of the pansharpening techniques: - The [*Root Mean Squared Error*]{} (RMSE) is one the most popular measures that accounts for spatial It is computed as u_k\right) = \sqrt{\dfrac{1}{|I|}\sum_{\p\in I} \left(u_k^R(\p) u_k(\p)\right)}, \forall \,k\in\{1,\ldots, and optimal is zero. We calculate this measure for each band and average the results over all bands to obtain a global - The Globale Adimensionelle Synth[è]{}se*]{} proposed Ranchin and Wald an index that gives a global the fused product. It is defined as $$\text{ERGAS} \dfrac{100}{s} \sqrt{\dfrac{1}{C} \left( \dfrac{\text{RMSE}\left(u^R_k, u_k\right)}{\mu_{u_k^R}}\right)^2},$$ where $s$ is sampling factor and $\mu_{u_k^R}$ is the mean value the $k$th spectral component of the reference image. Since the ERGAS is composed by a RMSE, its optimal value zero. - The Angle (SAM) by [*et al.*]{} is a measure of spectral quality computed in the space defined considering each channel as a coordinate axis. Mathematically, it is the
 cases, we initialized with a siMple interpOlatiOn oF eaCh SpecTral Channel by bicubIC splInes.

Quality Assessment INdiceS
--------------------------

FOR simULaTed daTa, the spATiAL And SpEcTraL cONsIstenCy oF the fusEd products WitH rEspect to the gROuNd-truth imaGes Are numericalLy eValuatEd By mEAns of SevEral qUality ASsessmEnt indiceS. LET $\u^R=\lefT(U_1^R, \ldots, U_c^r\rIght)$ Be the high-resolutiON rEFerence multispEctral ImAGe AND leT us Use the same NoTatioNS than in sEcTION \[seC:Numerics\]. We empLoy the folloWIng QualitY iNdiCEs for tHe evaLuATioN of the panshArpeNing technIques:

-   THE [*Root MeAN SquareD Error*]{} (rMSe) is One oF ThE mOst PoPUlaR MeAsuREs tHat accouNtS fOr spaTial DISTOrtiOn. IT is cOmputEd as $$\text{RMSE}\lEft(U^R_k, u_K\RigHt) = \sqrT{\dfraC{1}{|I|}\suM_{\p\In I} \leFt(u_k^R(\p) - U_k(\p)\riGhT)}, \quad \forall \,k\in\{1,\lDots, c\},$$ and its opTimAl ValUe Is zerO. we shalL caLcuLate thiS measurE For EaCH BAnD and average the resuLtS OVeR all bandS to obtAIn A gLObal valuE.

-   THe [*ERreuR rElatiVe GlOBaLe AdimenSionelLE dE SYnth[è]{}se*]{} (eRgAS) proPoSed By RAnchiN And WAld [@RanChinWald2000] Is an iNDex that gives a gLObal quality asSEsSMEnT Of thE fuSed product. IT is dEFineD as $$\tEXt{eRGas} = \dfraC{100}{s} \sqrT{\dFRaC{1}{c} \sum_{k=1}^C \left( \dfrac{\text{rMsE}\left(U^R_k, u_k\Right)}{\mu_{u_k^R}}\rigHt)^2},$$ where $s$ is THE Sampling FactOR aND $\mu_{u_k^R}$ is the meaN valuE of the $k$th sPEctral coMponeNt of the rEference iMAGe. Since tHe ErGAs is ComPOSeD by a sum of RMSE, ITS optImAl value Is zEro.

-   The [*SPecTraL AnGle maPper*]{} (SAM) inTroduced By alPaRoNe [*eT al.*]{} [@AlPAroneBarOnTi2004] iS a MeaSure oF SpectrAl quaLity CoMpUTed In the spACe DEFineD bY cOnsiDerInG each ChanNEl aS a coordInate axis. matHEmatIcAlLy, it is wRitten as the abSoLute
 cases, we initialized wit h a simple  inte rpo lat io n of  eac h spectral cha n nelby bicubic splines.

Q ualit yA sses s me nt In dices
- - -- - - --- -- -- --- -- - -- ----- 

F or simu lated data , t he  spatial and sp ectral con sis tency of the  fu sed pr od uct s  with  re spect  to th e  groun d-truth i ma g es are numeric a l ly  eva luated by means o f  s e veral qualityassess me n ti n dic es.  Let $\u^R =\ left( u _1^R, \ l do t s ,  u_ C ^R\right)$ be  the high-r e sol utionre fer e nce mu ltisp ec t ral  image andletus use th e same notatio n s thanin Sec tio n \ [sec : nu me ric s\ ] . W e  e mpl o y t he follo wi ng  qual ityi n d i cesfor  the  eval uation of the  pa nsha r pen ing t echni ques :
-  The [* RootMe an Squared Erro r*]{ } (RMSE)ison e o fthe m o st pop ula r m easures  that a c cou nt s f or  spatial distortio n. I tis compu ted as $$ \t e xt{RMSE} \l eft (u^R _ k , u_k \rig h t)  = \sqrt {\dfra c {1 }{ |I|}\su m_ {\p\in  I } \ lef t(u_k ^ R(\p ) - u_ k(\p)\ri ght)} ,  \quad \forall \,k\in\{1,\ld o ts , C\ } ,$$and  its optima l va l ue i s ze r o.  We shall  calc ul a te this measure for ea ch  bandand a verage the re sults over a l l bandsto o b ta i n a global val ue.
-   The [* E rreur Re lativ e Global e Adimens i o nelle de  Sy nth [è] {}s e * ]{ } (ERGAS) pro p o sedby  Ranchi n a nd Wald  [@ Ran chi nWa ld 2000] isan index  t ha tgi ves  a gl o bal qual it y a ss ess mento f thefused  pro du ct .  It  is def i ne d as $ $\ te xt{E RGA S}  = \d frac { 100 }{s} \s qrt{\dfra c{1 } {C}\s um _{k=1}^ C \left( \dfr ac {\text{RMS E} \le ft(u^R _ k , u_k\ri ght)}{\mu_{u_k^R}}\righ t )^2},$$  wh ere $ s$ i s the sam pli ng fac tor and $\ mu_{u_ k^R}$  i s t h e  mean v al ueof  the $k$th s pec tralco mpon ent ofthe reference imag e . S ince the ERGA S i s co m p os edb ya  su mo f R M S E, its optimalvalue is z er o .
-   The [ * Spe ct ral Ang le Mapp er*]{ }  (SAM)introduce d by Alpa ro ne [ * e t a l.*]{} [@A lparoneB aronti200 4 ] isa  m easur e o f spec tr alquali ty com p ute d inthe sp ac e defi ned b yconsider ing each channel as a c oordin ate a xis . Mathema tic a lly , it is w ritt en as theabs olu te
 cases,_we initialized_with a simple interpolation_of each_spectral_channel by_bicubic_splines.

Quality Assessment Indices
--------------------------

For_simulated data, the_spatial and spectral consistency_of the fused_products_with respect to the ground-truth images are numerically evaluated by means of several quality_assessment_indices. Let_$\u^R=\left(u_1^R,_\ldots,_u_C^R\right)$ be the high-resolution reference_multispectral image and let us_use the_same notations than in Section \[sec:numerics\]. We employ_the_following quality indices_for the evaluation of the pansharpening techniques:

-  _The [*Root Mean Squared Error*]{} (RMSE)_is one of_the_most_popular measures that accounts_for spatial distortion. It is computed_as $$\text{RMSE}\left(u^R_k, u_k\right) = \sqrt{\dfrac{1}{|I|}\sum_{\p\in I}_\left(u_k^R(\p) - u_k(\p)\right)}, \quad \forall \,k\in\{1,\ldots, C\},$$_and its optimal value is zero._We shall calculate this measure_for each_band and average the results_over all bands_to obtain_a global value.

-_  The [*Erreur Relative Globale_Adimensionelle de Synth[è]{}se*]{}_(ERGAS) proposed by Ranchin and Wald_[@RanchinWald2000]_is an index_that_gives_a global_quality assessment of_the_fused product._It_is defined as $$\text{ERGAS} = \dfrac{100}{s}_\sqrt{\dfrac{1}{C}_\sum_{k=1}^C \left( \dfrac{\text{RMSE}\left(u^R_k, u_k\right)}{\mu_{u_k^R}}\right)^2},$$ where $s$ is_the sampling factor and_$\mu_{u_k^R}$_is the mean value_of the $k$th spectral component_of the reference image. Since the_ERGAS is_composed by_a sum of RMSE, its optimal value is zero.

-  _The [*Spectral Angle Mapper*]{} (SAM) introduced_by Alparone [*et al.*]{}_[@AlparoneBaronti2004] is_a_measure of spectral_quality_computed in_the space defined by considering each channel_as a_coordinate axis. Mathematically, it is written_as the absolute