z_1,z_2,\ldots) &=&
%\tilde{\cal{L}}_{G}(\lambda;y_1,\ldots,y_{N(t)}) &=&
\tilde{\cal{L}}_{RSL}(\lambda,\theta;y_1,\ldots,y_{N(t)}) &=&
\lambda^{N} e^{-\lambda \sum z_i}
%\prod_{i=1}^{N(t)} g(y_i;\lambda).
%\prod_{i=1}^{N(t)} f(y_i;\lambda).
%\prod_{i=1}^{N(t)} f_G(y_i;\lambda).
%\prod_{i=1}^{N(t)} f_{RSL}(y_i;\lambda).
\prod_{i=1}^{N(t)} f_{RSL}(y_i;\lambda,\theta).\end{aligned}$$ [@hall1] shows that the Laplace transform $\gamma$ of $Y$ is $$\gamma(s) = 1+ \frac{s}{\lambda}-
%\left(\lambda\int_0^\infty \exp\{-st - \lambda \int_0^t\{1-G(x)\}dx\}dt\right)^{-1}.$$ (\_0\^{-st - \_0\^t{1-G(x;)}dx}dt)\^[-1]{}.$$ [@stadje] obtains the clump-length distribution function $F_{RSL}(y)$ by inversion of $\gamma$, but it is an infinite sum of self-convolutions of a function that may involve an integral with no analytic solution, making inference based on $\tilde{\cal{L}}_{RSL}$ difficult.

M-estimation
------------

An important issue in estimation of $\lambda$ is robustness under model misspecification. Inspection of the clump-lengths from the experimental data, such as the run depicted in Figure 1, reveals that the number of clumps with lengths slightly in excess of $t_0$ is greater than expected, so that the distribution between $t_0$ and $2t_0$ is not uniform. This can be caused by variability in diameter or velocity or by errors of measurement. A desirable property for any estimator is robustness to this departure from model assumptions. For mean segment length $\mu$, the mean clump-length is given by $$E(Y;\lambda) = \frac
z_1,z_2,\ldots) & = & 
% \tilde{\cal{L}}_{G}(\lambda;y_1,\ldots, y_{N(t) }) & = & 
 \tilde{\cal{L}}_{RSL}(\lambda,\theta;y_1,\ldots, y_{N(t) }) & = & 
 \lambda^{N } e^{-\lambda \sum z_i } 
% \prod_{i=1}^{N(t) } g(y_i;\lambda). 
% \prod_{i=1}^{N(t) } f(y_i;\lambda). 
% \prod_{i=1}^{N(t) } f_G(y_i;\lambda). 
% \prod_{i=1}^{N(t) } f_{RSL}(y_i;\lambda). 
 \prod_{i=1}^{N(t) } f_{RSL}(y_i;\lambda,\theta).\end{aligned}$$ [ @hall1 ] shows that the Laplace transform $ \gamma$ of $ Y$ is $ $ \gamma(s) = 1 + \frac{s}{\lambda}- 
% \left(\lambda\int_0^\infty \exp\{-st - \lambda \int_0^t\{1 - G(x)\}dx\}dt\right)^{-1}.$$ (\_0\^{-st - \_0\^t{1 - G(x;)}dx}dt)\^[-1]{}.$$ [ @stadje ] obtains the clump - duration distribution affair $ F_{RSL}(y)$ by inversion of $ \gamma$, but it is an infinite sum of self - gyrus of a function that may involve an built-in with no analytic solution, making inference based on $ \tilde{\cal{L}}_{RSL}$ difficult. 

 M - appraisal 
 ------------ 

 An important issue in estimate of $ \lambda$ is robustness under model misspecification. Inspection of the clump - length from the experimental data, such as the run depicted in Figure 1, reveals that the number of clumps with length slightly in excess of $ t_0 $ is greater than expect, so that the distribution between $ t_0 $ and $ 2t_0 $ is not uniform. This can be caused by variability in diameter or velocity or by mistake of measurement. A desirable property for any estimator is robustness to this departure from model assumptions. For hateful segment length $ \mu$, the mean clump - length is move over by $ $ E(Y;\lambda) = \frac
z_1,z_2,\lfots) &=&
%\tilde{\cal{L}}_{G}(\lambda;y_1,\lduts,y_{N(t)}) &=&
\tilde{\cal{L}}_{RSL}(\lamuda,\thetz;y_1,\ldots,y_{V(t)}) &=&
\lambda^{N} e^{-\lambda \sum z_i}
%\prov_{i=1}^{N(t)} g(y_i;\lqmbda).
%\prod_{i=1}^{N(t)} f(y_i;\lambda).
%\orod_{i=1}^{N(t)} f_H(y_i;\lambdq).
%\prov_{i=1}^{N(t)} f_{RSL}(y_i;\lambde).
\lrod_{i=1}^{N(t)} f_{RSL}(y_j;\pambba,\vheta).\end{aligned}$$ [@hall1] showv that the Lapnaze transform $\gamma$ of $Y$ is $$\gamma(s) = 1+ \fwac{s}{\lamndw}-
%\left(\lambda\int_0^\ynftj \qxp\{-sf - \lambda \int_0^t\{1-G(x)\}dx\}dt\right)^{-1}.$$ (\_0\^{-st - \_0\^t{1-G(x;)}ds}dt)\^[-1]{}.$$ [@stavje] obtains the clump-length distribution vunchion $F_{RSL}(y)$ by invegsion of $\ganma$, fyt it is an knfinite slk of self-cknvolutions of a function that oay iuvolve an ibtwgrwn with no aialytib solution, making infarence nased on $\tilde{\gal{L}}_{RVL}$ eifficult.

M-estimation
------------

Ai important issue in estimatimn of $\lambda$ is robysrness undar mueel mias'ecjficatlon. Inspectioh of the clymp-lengths from the evirrimental dafa, sucr ws the run depicted in Figure 1, reveals uhat fhe number of clumps wirh lengths slightly ij excess jf $t_0$ is greater than expected, so that the distribgtion cetcccn $t_0$ qnf $2t_0$ is not uniform. This can be caused by variwgikiny in diameter or velocity ot hy grrors of measorement. A sesirable property for ani estinator is wobuxtness to this departure frim model asslmptuons. For mean segmznt length $\mb$, the kean vlump-length is given by $$E(Y;\lzmbda) = \frac
z_1,z_2,\ldots) &=& %\tilde{\cal{L}}_{G}(\lambda;y_1,\ldots,y_{N(t)}) &=& \tilde{\cal{L}}_{RSL}(\lambda,\theta;y_1,\ldots,y_{N(t)}) &=& \lambda^{N} z_i} g(y_i;\lambda). %\prod_{i=1}^{N(t)} %\prod_{i=1}^{N(t)} f_G(y_i;\lambda). %\prod_{i=1}^{N(t)} that Laplace transform $\gamma$ $Y$ is $$\gamma(s) 1+ \frac{s}{\lambda}- %\left(\lambda\int_0^\infty \exp\{-st - \lambda (\_0\^{-st - \_0\^t{1-G(x;)}dx}dt)\^[-1]{}.$$ [@stadje] obtains the clump-length distribution function $F_{RSL}(y)$ by inversion of but it is an infinite sum of self-convolutions of a function that may an with analytic making inference based on $\tilde{\cal{L}}_{RSL}$ difficult. M-estimation ------------ An important issue in estimation of $\lambda$ is under model misspecification. Inspection of the clump-lengths from experimental data, such as run depicted in Figure 1, that number of with slightly excess of $t_0$ greater than expected, so that the distribution between $t_0$ and $2t_0$ is not uniform. This can be by variability or velocity by of A desirable property estimator is robustness to this departure For mean segment length $\mu$, the mean clump-length given by = \frac
z_1,z_2,\ldots) &=&
%\tilde{\cal{L}}_{G}(\lambda;y_1,\lDots,y_{N(t)}) &=&
\tilDe{\cal{l}}_{RSl}(\laMbDa,\thEta;y_1,\Ldots,y_{N(t)}) &=&
\lambda^{n} E^{-\lamBda \sum z_i}
%\prod_{i=1}^{N(t)} g(y_i;\lambDa).
%\proD_{i=1}^{n(T)} f(y_i;\LAmBda).
%\prOd_{i=1}^{N(t)} f_G(Y_I;\lAMBda).
%\PrOd_{I=1}^{N(t)} F_{Rsl}(y_I;\lambDa).
\pRod_{i=1}^{N(t)} f_{rSL}(y_i;\lambdA,\thEtA).\end{aligned}$$ [@hALl1] Shows that tHe LAplace transfOrm $\Gamma$ oF $Y$ Is $$\gAMma(s) = 1+ \fRac{S}{\lambDa}-
%\left(\LAmbda\iNt_0^\infty \exP\{-sT - \Lambda \INt_0^t\{1-G(x)\}dx\}DT\RiGht)^{-1}.$$ (\_0\^{-sT - \_0\^t{1-G(x;)}dx}dt)\^[-1]{}.$$ [@stadje] obtAInS The clump-length DistriBuTIoN FUncTioN $F_{RSL}(y)$ by inVeRsion OF $\gamma$, bUT iT IS An iNFinite sum of seLf-convolutiONs oF a funcTiOn tHAt may iNvolvE aN IntEgral with no AnalYtic solutIon, makINg inferENce baseD on $\tilDe{\cAl{L}}_{rSL}$ dIFfIcUlt.

m-eSTimATiOn
------------

AN ImpOrtant isSuE iN estiMatiON OF $\LambDa$ iS robUstneSs under model mIssPeciFIcaTion. INspecTion Of The clUmp-lenGths fRoM the experimentaL datA, such as thE ruN dEpiCtEd in FIGure 1, reVeaLs tHat the nUmber of CLumPs WITH lEngths slightly in exCeSS Of $T_0$ is greatEr than EXpEcTEd, so that ThE diStriBUTion bEtweEN $t_0$ And $2t_0$ is noT unifoRM. THiS can be cAuSed by vArIabIliTy in dIAmetEr or veLocity or By errORs of measuremenT. a desirable proPErTY FoR Any eStiMator is robuStneSS to tHis dEPaRtuRE from Model AsSUmPTions. For mean segment LeNgth $\mu$, The meAn clump-length Is given by $$E(y;\LAMbda) = \frac
z_1,z_2,\ldots) &=&
%\tild e{\cal{L}} _{G}( \la mbd a; y_1, \ldo ts,y_{N(t)}) & = &
\t ilde{\cal{L}}_{RSL}(\l ambda ,\ t heta ; y_ 1,\ld ots,y_{ N (t ) } ) & =& 
\ lam bd a ^{ N} e^ {-\ lambda\sum z_i}%\p ro d_{i=1}^{N(t ) }g(y_i;\lam bda ).
%\prod_{i =1} ^{N(t) }f(y _ i;\la mbd a).
% \prod_ { i=1}^{ N(t)} f_G (y _ i;\lam b da).
%\ p r od _{i= 1}^{N(t)} f_{RSL} ( y_ i ;\lambda).
\pr od_{i= 1} ^ {N ( t )}f_{ RSL}(y_i;\ la mbda, \ theta). \ en d { a lig n ed}$$ [@hall1 ] shows tha t  th e Lapl ac e t r ansfor m $\g am m a$of $Y$ is $ $\ga mma(s) =1+ \fr a c{s}{\l a mbda}-%\left (\l amb da\i n t_ 0^ \in ft y  \e x p\ {-s t  -\lambda\i nt _0^t\ {1-G ( x ) \ }dx\ }dt \rig ht)^{ -1}.$$ (\_0\^ {-s t -\ _0\ ^t{1- G(x;) }dx} dt )\^[- 1]{}.$ $ [@s ta dje] obtains th e cl ump-lengt h d is tri bu tionf unctio n $ F_{ RSL}(y) $ by in v ers io n o f$\gamma$, but it i sa n  i nfinitesum of se lf - convolut io nsof a f uncti on t h at  may inv olve a n  i nt egral w it h no a na lyt icsolut i on,making  inferen ce ba s ed on $\tilde{ \ cal{L}}_{RSL} $  d i f fi c ult. 

M -estimation 
--- - ---- ---- 
A n i m porta nt is su e  i n  estimation of $\la mb da$ is  robu stness undermodel miss p e c ificatio n. I n sp e ction of the c lump- lengths fr o m the ex perim ental da ta, sucha s  the run  de pic ted  in F ig ure 1, reveal s that  t he numb erof clum pswit h l eng th s slightl y in exc es sof  $ t_0 $ isg reater t ha n e xp ect ed, s o  thatthe d istr ib ut i onbetween $t _ 0 $ an d$2 t_0$  is  n ot un ifor m . T his can  be cause d b y  var ia bi lity in  diameter orve locity orby  er rors o f measurem ent. A desirable proper t y for a nyestim ator  is robus tne ss tothi s  depar ture f rom m od ela s sumpt i o ns . F or  mean segm e n t l ength  $ \mu$ , the m ean clump-length i s  gi ven by $$E(Y; \la mbda ) =\fr a c
z_1,z_2,\ldots) &=&
%\tilde{\cal{L}}_{G}(\lambda;y_1,\ldots,y_{N(t)})_&=&
\tilde{\cal{L}}_{RSL}(\lambda,\theta;y_1,\ldots,y_{N(t)}) &=&
\lambda^{N}_e^{-\lambda \sum z_i}
%\prod_{i=1}^{N(t)} g(y_i;\lambda).
%\prod_{i=1}^{N(t)}_f(y_i;\lambda).
%\prod_{i=1}^{N(t)} f_G(y_i;\lambda).
%\prod_{i=1}^{N(t)}_f_{RSL}(y_i;\lambda).
\prod_{i=1}^{N(t)}_f_{RSL}(y_i;\lambda,\theta).\end{aligned}$$ [@hall1]_shows_that the Laplace_transform $\gamma$ of_$Y$ is $$\gamma(s) =_1+ \frac{s}{\lambda}-
%\left(\lambda\int_0^\infty \exp\{-st_-_\lambda \int_0^t\{1-G(x)\}dx\}dt\right)^{-1}.$$ (\_0\^{-st - \_0\^t{1-G(x;)}dx}dt)\^[-1]{}.$$ [@stadje] obtains the clump-length distribution function $F_{RSL}(y)$ by inversion_of_$\gamma$, but_it_is_an infinite sum of self-convolutions_of a function that may_involve an_integral with no analytic solution, making inference based_on_$\tilde{\cal{L}}_{RSL}$ difficult.

M-estimation
------------

An important_issue in estimation of $\lambda$ is robustness under model_misspecification. Inspection of the clump-lengths from_the experimental data,_such_as_the run depicted in_Figure 1, reveals that the number_of clumps with lengths slightly in_excess of $t_0$ is greater than expected,_so that the distribution between $t_0$_and $2t_0$ is not uniform._This can_be caused by variability in_diameter or velocity_or by_errors of measurement._A desirable property for any estimator_is robustness to_this departure from model assumptions. For_mean_segment length $\mu$,_the_mean_clump-length is_given by $$E(Y;\lambda)_=_\frac