2inrem\]) and using the identity (\[intidentity1\]), we conclude that $$2ig_0\Phi_2^{(2)} = \frac{8g_0}{\pi} \int_{\gamma} k^3\int_{-t}^t I_2(t,s)e^{2ik^4(s - t)}ds dk
= g_0\left(m(t,t) + \frac{i}{2}\bar{g}_0n(t,t)\right).$$ On the other hand, we can write $c^{(3)}$ as the sum of two terms, $c^{(3)} = c_1^{(3)} +c_2^{(3)}$, where $$\label{c13def}  
  c_1^{(3)}= \frac{i}{\pi}\int_{\gamma} k^2\left(\Phi_1(t,k) + i \Phi_1(t, ik) + \frac{ig_0}{k}\right) dk,$$ and $c_2^{(3)}$ involves the quotient $b(k)/a(k)$. Substituting the GLM representation for $\Phi_1$ into (\[c13def\]) and integrating the term in the resulting expression involving $k^5$ by parts, we find $$c_1^{(3)} = \frac{1}{\pi}\int_{\gamma} \left[kn(t,t) - kn(t,-t)e^{-4ik^4t} - \int_{-t}^t kn_{s}(t,s)e^{2ik^4(s-t)}ds -kg_0\right]dk.$$ Using the identity (\[intidentity2\]) and the initial condition $n(t,t) = g_0(t)$, this gives $$\label{c13final}  
  c_1^{(3)} = -c_1 (\mathcal{A}^{-1}n)(t,t).$$ Finally, simplifying $c_2^{(3)}$ as in the proof of theorem \[th2\], we deduce that $c_2^{(3)}$ is given by the terms on the right-hand side of equation (\[g1th2\]) which involve the functions $f_0$ and $f_2$. In summary, after collecting the various contributions, we conclude that (\[g1th2\]) can be derived from (\[g1expression\]).

The case of
2inrem\ ]) and using the identity (\[intidentity1\ ]), we conclude that $ $ 2ig_0\Phi_2^{(2) } = \frac{8g_0}{\pi } \int_{\gamma } k^3\int_{-t}^t I_2(t, s)e^{2ik^4(s - t)}ds dk 
 = g_0\left(m(t, t) + \frac{i}{2}\bar{g}_0n(t, t)\right).$$ On the other hand, we can spell $ c^{(3)}$ as the kernel of two terms, $ c^{(3) } = c_1^{(3) } + c_2^{(3)}$, where $ $ \label{c13def }  
   c_1^{(3)}= \frac{i}{\pi}\int_{\gamma } k^2\left(\Phi_1(t, k) + i \Phi_1(t, ik) + \frac{ig_0}{k}\right) dk,$$ and $ c_2^{(3)}$ involves the quotient $ b(k)/a(k)$. Substituting the GLM theatrical performance for $ \Phi_1 $ into (\[c13def\ ]) and integrating the term in the resulting saying involving $ k^5 $ by parts, we recover $ $ c_1^{(3) } = \frac{1}{\pi}\int_{\gamma } \left[kn(t, t) - kn(t,-t)e^{-4ik^4 t } - \int_{-t}^t kn_{s}(t, s)e^{2ik^4(s - t)}ds -kg_0\right]dk.$$ Using the identity (\[intidentity2\ ]) and the initial condition $ n(t, t) = g_0(t)$, this give $ $ \label{c13final }  
   c_1^{(3) } = -c_1 (\mathcal{A}^{-1}n)(t, t).$$ Finally, simplifying $ c_2^{(3)}$ as in the validation of theorem \[th2\ ], we deduce that $ c_2^{(3)}$ is given by the terms on the right - hand side of equation (\[g1th2\ ]) which involve the function $ f_0 $ and $ f_2$. In summary, after collecting the various contributions, we reason that (\[g1th2\ ]) can be derived from (\[g1expression\ ]). 

 The case of
2inrfm\]) and using the identitn (\[intidentity1\]), we concluve that $$2ig_0\Phi_2^{(2)} = \wrac{8g_0}{\pi} \int_{\gamma} k^3\int_{-t}^t I_2(t,s)e^{2mk^4(s - t)}ds ek
= g_0\left(m(t,t) + \frac{i}{2}\bar{g}_0v(t,t)\right).$$ Ln the orher yand, we cai write $g^{(3)}$ as fme suk of two terms, $g^{(3)} = c_1^{(3)} +c_2^{(3)}$, whera $$\label{c13def}  
  c_1^{(3)}= \fxac{i}{\pi}\int_{\gamma} k^2\left(\Phi_1(t,k) + i \Phi_1(t, ik) + \frac{ib_0}{k}\gight) dk,$$ and $c_2^{(3)}$ invpjves nht quotient $b(k)/a(k)$. Substituting the FLM repgesentation for $\Pni_1$ into (\[c13def\]) and integratijg tje term in the resklting exprgasijb involving $y^5$ by parts, we find $$c_1^{(3)} = \rrac{1}{\pi}\int_{\gamma} \left[kn(t,t) - kn(t,-t)e^{-4iy^4t} - \iut_{-t}^t kn_{s}(t,s)e^{2uk^4(w-t)}dd -kg_0\right]dk.$$ Nsing nhe identity (\[lmtidendity2\]) anc the initial gondivion $n(t,t) = g_0(t)$, this gives $$\lebel{c13final}  
  c_1^{(3)} = -c_1 (\mwthcal{A}^{-1}n)(t,d).$$ Yinally, simplifying $c_2^{(3)}$ aw in jhe psoof if ghekrxm \[fh2\], we fednce that $c_2^{(3)}$ js given by the terms on the rogrn-nand side of equatyog (\[g1th2\]) which involve the functions $f_0$ and $f_2$. Jn summary, after collecring the various conttibutions, re conclude that (\[g1th2\]) can be derived from (\[g1expresshon\]).

Thx zast if
2inrem\]) and using the identity (\[intidentity1\]), we $$2ig_0\Phi_2^{(2)} \frac{8g_0}{\pi} \int_{\gamma} I_2(t,s)e^{2ik^4(s - t)}ds On other hand, we write $c^{(3)}$ as sum of two terms, $c^{(3)} = +c_2^{(3)}$, where $$\label{c13def} c_1^{(3)}= \frac{i}{\pi}\int_{\gamma} k^2\left(\Phi_1(t,k) + i \Phi_1(t, ik) + \frac{ig_0}{k}\right) dk,$$ $c_2^{(3)}$ involves the quotient $b(k)/a(k)$. Substituting the GLM representation for $\Phi_1$ into (\[c13def\]) integrating term the expression involving $k^5$ by parts, we find $$c_1^{(3)} = \frac{1}{\pi}\int_{\gamma} \left[kn(t,t) - kn(t,-t)e^{-4ik^4t} - \int_{-t}^t kn_{s}(t,s)e^{2ik^4(s-t)}ds Using the identity (\[intidentity2\]) and the initial condition = g_0(t)$, this gives c_1^{(3)} = -c_1 (\mathcal{A}^{-1}n)(t,t).$$ Finally, $c_2^{(3)}$ in the of \[th2\], deduce that $c_2^{(3)}$ given by the terms on the right-hand side of equation (\[g1th2\]) which involve the functions $f_0$ and In summary, the various we that can be derived The case of
2inrem\]) and using the identity (\[iNtidentity1\]), We conCluDe tHaT $$2ig_0\PHi_2^{(2)} = \frAc{8g_0}{\pi} \int_{\gamma} k^3\INt_{-t}^t i_2(t,s)e^{2ik^4(s - t)}ds dk
= g_0\left(m(t,t) + \frAc{i}{2}\baR{g}_0N(T,t)\riGHt).$$ on the Other haND, wE CAn wRiTe $C^{(3)}$ as ThE SuM of twO teRms, $c^{(3)} = c_1^{(3)} +c_2^{(3)}$, wHere $$\label{c13Def}  
  C_1^{(3)}= \fRac{i}{\pi}\int_{\gamMA} k^2\Left(\Phi_1(t,k) + i \phi_1(T, ik) + \frac{ig_0}{k}\riGht) Dk,$$ and $c_2^{(3)}$ InVolVEs the QuoTient $B(k)/a(k)$. SuBStitutIng the GLM RePResentATion for $\pHI_1$ iNto (\[c13Def\]) and integrating THe TErm in the resultIng expReSSiON InvOlvIng $k^5$ by partS, wE find $$C_1^{(3)} = \Frac{1}{\pi}\iNT_{\gAMMA} \leFT[kn(t,t) - kn(t,-t)e^{-4ik^4t} - \Int_{-t}^t kn_{s}(t,s)e^{2IK^4(s-t)}Ds -kg_0\riGhT]dk.$$ uSing thE idenTiTY (\[inTidentity2\]) anD the Initial coNditioN $N(t,t) = g_0(t)$, thIS gives $$\lAbel{c13fInaL}  
  c_1^{(3)} = -c_1 (\MathCAl{a}^{-1}n)(T,t).$$ FInALly, SImPliFYinG $c_2^{(3)}$ as in thE pRoOf of tHeorEM \[TH2\], We deDucE thaT $c_2^{(3)}$ is gIven by the termS on The rIGht-Hand sIde of EquaTiOn (\[g1th2\]) Which iNvolvE tHe functions $f_0$ and $F_2$. In sUmmary, aftEr cOlLecTiNg the VArious ConTriButions, We conclUDe tHaT (\[G1TH2\]) cAn be derived from (\[g1exPrESSiOn\]).

The casE of
2inrem\]) and using the id entity (\[ intid ent ity 1\ ]),we c onclude that $ $ 2ig_ 0\Phi_2^{(2)} = \frac{ 8g_0} {\ p i} \ i nt _{\ga mma} k^ 3 \i n t _{- t} ^t  I_ 2( t ,s )e^{2 ik^ 4(s - t )}ds dk
=g_0 \l eft(m(t,t) + \f rac{i}{2}\ bar {g}_0n(t,t)\ rig ht).$$  O n t h e oth erhand,  we ca n  write  $c^{(3)} $a s thes um of t w o  t erms , $c^{(3)} = c_1^ { (3 ) } +c_2^{(3)}$,  where  $ $ \l a b el{ c13 def}  
  c _1 ^{(3) } = \frac { i} { \ p i}\ i nt_{\gamma} k ^2\left(\Ph i _1( t,k) +  i  \P h i_1(t,  ik)+\ fra c{ig_0}{k}\ righ t) dk,$$and $c _ 2^{(3)} $  involv es the  qu oti ent$ b( k) /a( k) $ . S u bs tit u tin g the GL Mre prese ntat i o n for$\P hi_1 $ int o (\[c13def\] ) a nd i n teg ratin g the  ter min th e resu lting  e xpression invol ving  $k^5$ by  pa rt s,we  find $$c_1^ {(3 )}= \frac {1}{\pi } \in t_ { \ g am ma} \left[kn(t,t)-k n (t ,-t)e^{- 4ik^4t }  -  \ i nt_{-t}^ tkn_ {s}( t , s)e^{ 2ik^ 4 (s -t)}ds - kg_0\r i gh t] dk.$$ U si ng the  i den tit y (\[ i ntid entity 2\]) and  thei nitial conditi o n $n(t,t) = g _ 0( t ) $, this  gi ves $$\labe l{c1 3 fina l}  c_1 ^ {(3)}  = -c _1 (\ m athcal{A}^{-1}n)(t, t) .$$ Fi nally , simplifying  $c_2^{(3) } $ as in th e pr o of of theorem \[t h2\],  we deduce that $c_ 2^{(3 )}$ is g iven by t h e  terms o n t herig ht- h a nd  side of equa t i on ( \[ g1th2\] ) w hich in vol vethe  fu nc tions $f_ 0$ and $ f_ 2$ .In  su mmary ,  after c ol lec ti ngthe v a riouscontr ibut io ns ,  we  conclu d et h at ( \[ g1 th2\ ])ca n bederi v edfrom (\ [g1expres sio n \]). 
Th e caseof
2inrem\]) and_using the_identity (\[intidentity1\]), we conclude_that $$2ig_0\Phi_2^{(2)}_=_\frac{8g_0}{\pi} \int_{\gamma}_k^3\int_{-t}^t_I_2(t,s)e^{2ik^4(s - t)}ds_dk
= g_0\left(m(t,t) +_\frac{i}{2}\bar{g}_0n(t,t)\right).$$ On the other_hand, we can_write_$c^{(3)}$ as the sum of two terms, $c^{(3)} = c_1^{(3)} +c_2^{(3)}$, where $$\label{c13def} _
_ c_1^{(3)}=_\frac{i}{\pi}\int_{\gamma}_k^2\left(\Phi_1(t,k)_+ i \Phi_1(t, ik) +_\frac{ig_0}{k}\right) dk,$$ and $c_2^{(3)}$ involves_the quotient_$b(k)/a(k)$. Substituting the GLM representation for $\Phi_1$ into_(\[c13def\])_and integrating the_term in the resulting expression involving $k^5$ by parts,_we find $$c_1^{(3)} = \frac{1}{\pi}\int_{\gamma} \left[kn(t,t)_- kn(t,-t)e^{-4ik^4t} -_\int_{-t}^t_kn_{s}(t,s)e^{2ik^4(s-t)}ds_-kg_0\right]dk.$$ Using the identity_(\[intidentity2\]) and the initial condition $n(t,t)_= g_0(t)$, this gives $$\label{c13final} _
  c_1^{(3)} = -c_1 (\mathcal{A}^{-1}n)(t,t).$$ Finally,_simplifying $c_2^{(3)}$ as in the proof_of theorem \[th2\], we deduce_that $c_2^{(3)}$_is given by the terms_on the right-hand_side of_equation (\[g1th2\]) which_involve the functions $f_0$ and $f_2$._In summary, after_collecting the various contributions, we conclude_that_(\[g1th2\]) can be_derived_from_(\[g1expression\]).

The case_of