 if there exists a function $\psi:[0,\infty[\to[0,\infty]$ with the property $\lim_{t\to 0}{\psi(t)}/{t}=0$ such that for every two points $x$ and $y$ in ${\ensuremath{\mathcal H}}$ and every $\lambda\in\ ]0,1[$ such that $(1-\lambda)x+\lambda y\in{\ensuremath{\operatorname{dom}}}f$, $$\label{uniform smoothness}
f\big((1-\lambda)x+\lambda y\big)+\lambda(1-\lambda)\psi\big(\|x-y\|\big)\geq(1-\lambda)f(x)+\lambda f(y).$$ The smallest possible function $\psi$ satisfying  is called the *gauge of uniform smoothness* of $f$ and is defined by $$\psi_f(t)=\sup\bigg\{\frac{(1-\lambda)f(x)+\lambda f(y)-f((1-\lambda)x+\lambda y)}{\lambda(1-\lambda)}\ \bigg|\ \begin{array}{c}
\lambda\in\ ]0,1[,\ x,y\in{\ensuremath{\mathcal H}},\ \|x-y\|=t, \\ 
\big((1-\lambda)x+\lambda y\big)\in{\ensuremath{\operatorname{dom}}}f
\end{array}\  \bigg\}.$$

\[uniform convexity equivalent to uniform monotonicity\]*[@Zal Theorem 3.5.10, (i)$\Leftrightarrow$(v)]* Suppose that $f:{\ensuremath{\mathcal H}}\to{\ensuremath{\,\left]-\infty,+\infty\right]}}$ is proper, lower semicontinuous and convex. Then $f$ is uniformly convex if and only if $\partial f$ is uniformly monotone, in which case $\partial f$ is ${\ensuremath{\varphi}}$-uniformly monotone with ${\ensuremath{\varphi}}=2{\ensuremath{\varphi}}_f^{**}$.

Consequently, we arrive at the following results:

\[uniform convexity is dominant or recessive\] ***(uniform convexity is dominant w.r.t. $p_\mu$)*** Suppose that for each $i\in I$, $f_i:{\ensuremath{\mathcal H}}\to{\ensuremath{\,\left]-\infty,+\infty\right]}}$ is proper, lower semicontinuous, convex and there exists $i_0\
if there exists a function $ \psi:[0,\infty[\to[0,\infty]$ with the property $ \lim_{t\to 0}{\psi(t)}/{t}=0 $ such that for every two points $ x$ and $ y$ in $ { \ensuremath{\mathcal H}}$ and every $ \lambda\in\ ] 0,1[$ such that $ (1-\lambda)x+\lambda y\in{\ensuremath{\operatorname{dom}}}f$, $ $ \label{uniform smoothness } 
 f\big((1-\lambda)x+\lambda y\big)+\lambda(1-\lambda)\psi\big(\|x - y\|\big)\geq(1-\lambda)f(x)+\lambda f(y).$$ The little potential function $ \psi$ satisfying    is called the * bore of uniform smoothness * of $ f$ and is define by $ $ \psi_f(t)=\sup\bigg\{\frac{(1-\lambda)f(x)+\lambda f(y)-f((1-\lambda)x+\lambda y)}{\lambda(1-\lambda)}\ \bigg|\ \begin{array}{c } 
 \lambda\in\ ] 0,1[,\ x, y\in{\ensuremath{\mathcal H}},\ \|x - y\|=t, \\ 
 \big((1-\lambda)x+\lambda y\big)\in{\ensuremath{\operatorname{dom}}}f 
 \end{array}\   \bigg\}.$$ 

 \[uniform convexity equivalent to uniform monotonicity\]*[@Zal Theorem 3.5.10, (i)$\Leftrightarrow$(v) ] * presuppose that $ f:{\ensuremath{\mathcal H}}\to{\ensuremath{\,\left]-\infty,+\infty\right]}}$ is proper, lower semicontinuous and convex. Then $ f$ is uniformly convex if and entirely if $ \partial f$ is uniformly monotone, in which event $ \partial f$ is $ { \ensuremath{\varphi}}$-uniformly monotone with $ { \ensuremath{\varphi}}=2{\ensuremath{\varphi}}_f^{**}$. 

 Consequently, we arrive at the following resultant role: 

 \[uniform convexity is dominant or recessive\ ] * * * (undifferentiated convex shape is dominant w.r.t. $ p_\mu$) * * * Suppose that for each $ i\in I$, $ f_i:{\ensuremath{\mathcal H}}\to{\ensuremath{\,\left]-\infty,+\infty\right]}}$ is proper, lower semicontinuous, convex and there exist $ i_0\
 if there exists a function $\psi:[0,\infty[\to[0,\infti]$ qith tie propsrty $\lim_{g\to 0}{\psi(t)}/{t}=0$ such that for everb twi poibts $x$ and $y$ in ${\ensuremxth{\mathcap H}}$ and wverb $\lambda\in\ ]0,1[$ such that $(1-\lambda)x+\lzlbda b\in{\ensuremath{\opgratorname{dok}}}f$, $$\label{unifork rmlothness}
f\big((1-\lambda)x+\lambda y\big)+\lambdw(1-\lambda)\lsl\big(\|x-y\|\big)\geq(1-\laibda)g(v)+\lamgda f(y).$$ The smallest possible functjon $\psi$ satisfying  ix called the *gauge of uniflrm dmoothness* of $f$ anf is definee by $$\psi_f(t)=\sup\bigg\{\wrac{(1-\lambda)f(x)+\lambda f(y)-f((1-\mambda)x+\lambda y)}{\lambda(1-\lambda)}\ \bige|\ \begnn{array}{c}
\lamvdq\in\ ]0,1[,\ x,y\in{\ensurenath{\mwthcal H}},\ \|x-y\|=t, \\ 
\big((1-\lamtda)x+\lamnda y\big)\in{\ensuvemati{\opeeatorname{dom}}}f
\end{array}\  \bigg\}.$$

\[uniform convgxity equieament to uniform minitoniwity\]*[@Sal Gyeofem 3.5.10, (m)$\Lertrighharcow$(v)]* Supposs that $f:{\ensyremath{\mathcal H}}\to{\emstgrmath{\,\left]-\inffy,+\inftr\ryght]}}$ is proper, lower semicontinuous and cohvex. Then $f$ is uniformlt convex if and only lf $\partiaj f$ is uniformly monotone, in which case $\partial f$ is ${\eisjrenabh{\vafphl}}$-uniformly monotone with ${\ensuremath{\varphi}}=2{\ensuwsmstm{\varphi}}_f^{**}$.

Consequektly, we arrive at yhf gjllowing resuuts:

\[uniykrj convexity is domlnant ot recewsive\] ***(unisorm convexity is dominant w.r.t. $p_\mu$)*** Suppose nhat for each $i\in I$, $f_i:{\znsuremath{\machcal N}}\to{\enxuremath{\,\left]-\infty,+\infty\rnght]}}$ ia proper, loaer semickvtinuous, convex xnd tvere exists $i_0\
if there exists a function $\psi:[0,\infty[\to[0,\infty]$ with $\lim_{t\to such that every two points H}}$ every $\lambda\in\ ]0,1[$ that $(1-\lambda)x+\lambda y\in{\ensuremath{\operatorname{dom}}}f$, smoothness} f\big((1-\lambda)x+\lambda y\big)+\lambda(1-\lambda)\psi\big(\|x-y\|\big)\geq(1-\lambda)f(x)+\lambda f(y).$$ The smallest function $\psi$ satisfying is called the *gauge of uniform smoothness* of $f$ and defined by $$\psi_f(t)=\sup\bigg\{\frac{(1-\lambda)f(x)+\lambda f(y)-f((1-\lambda)x+\lambda y)}{\lambda(1-\lambda)}\ \bigg|\ \begin{array}{c} \lambda\in\ ]0,1[,\ x,y\in{\ensuremath{\mathcal H}},\ \|x-y\|=t, \\ y\big)\in{\ensuremath{\operatorname{dom}}}f \bigg\}.$$ convexity to uniform monotonicity\]*[@Zal Theorem 3.5.10, (i)$\Leftrightarrow$(v)]* Suppose that $f:{\ensuremath{\mathcal H}}\to{\ensuremath{\,\left]-\infty,+\infty\right]}}$ is proper, lower semicontinuous and convex. $f$ is uniformly convex if and only if f$ is uniformly monotone, which case $\partial f$ is monotone ${\ensuremath{\varphi}}=2{\ensuremath{\varphi}}_f^{**}$. Consequently, arrive the results: \[uniform convexity dominant or recessive\] ***(uniform convexity is dominant w.r.t. $p_\mu$)*** Suppose that for each $i\in I$, $f_i:{\ensuremath{\mathcal H}}\to{\ensuremath{\,\left]-\infty,+\infty\right]}}$ proper, lower and there $i_0\
 if there exists a function $\psi:[0,\Infty[\to[0,\infTy]$ witH thE prOpErty $\Lim_{t\To 0}{\psi(t)}/{t}=0$ such thaT For eVery two points $x$ and $y$ in ${\enSuremAtH{\MathCAl h}}$ and eVery $\lamBDa\IN\ ]0,1[$ SucH tHaT $(1-\laMbDA)x+\LambdA y\iN{\ensureMath{\operatOrnAmE{dom}}}f$, $$\label{unIFoRm smoothneSs}
f\Big((1-\lambda)x+\laMbdA y\big)+\lAmBda(1-\LAmbda)\Psi\Big(\|x-y\|\Big)\geq(1-\LAmbda)f(X)+\lambda f(y).$$ thE SmalleST possibLE FuNctiOn $\psi$ satisfying  is CAlLEd the *gauge of unIform sMoOThNESs* oF $f$ aNd is defineD bY $$\psi_f(T)=\Sup\bigg\{\FRaC{(1-\LAMbdA)F(x)+\lambda f(y)-f((1-\laMbda)x+\lambda Y)}{\LamBda(1-\lamBdA)}\ \biGG|\ \begin{Array}{C}
\lAMbdA\in\ ]0,1[,\ x,y\in{\ensuRemaTh{\mathcal h}},\ \|x-y\|=t, \\ 
\biG((1-\Lambda)x+\LAmbda y\bIg)\in{\enSurEmaTh{\opERaToRnaMe{DOm}}}f
\ENd{ArrAY}\  \biGg\}.$$

\[uniforM cOnVexitY equIVALEnt tO unIforM monoTonicity\]*[@Zal ThEorEm 3.5.10, (i)$\LEFtrIghtaRrow$(v)]* suppOsE that $F:{\ensurEmath{\MaThcal H}}\to{\ensuremAth{\,\lEft]-\infty,+\iNftY\rIghT]}}$ iS propER, lower SemIcoNtinuouS and conVEx. THeN $F$ IS uNiformly convex if anD oNLY iF $\partial F$ is uniFOrMlY Monotone, In WhiCh caSE $\PartiAl f$ iS ${\EnSuremath{\Varphi}}$-UNiFoRmly monOtOne witH ${\eNsuRemAth{\vaRPhi}}=2{\eNsuremAth{\varphI}}_f^{**}$.

ConSEquently, we arriVE at the followiNG rESUlTS:

\[uniForM convexity iS domINant Or reCEsSivE\] ***(UnifoRm conVeXItY Is dominant w.r.t. $p_\mu$)*** SupPoSe that For eaCh $i\in I$, $f_i:{\ensurEmath{\mathcAL h}}\To{\ensureMath{\,\LEfT]-\Infty,+\infty\righT]}}$ is prOper, lower sEMicontinUous, cOnvex and There exisTS $I_0\
 if there exists a functio n $\psi:[0 ,\inf ty[ \to [0 ,\in fty] $ with the pro p erty  $\lim_{t\to 0}{\psi(t )}/{t }= 0 $ su c hthatfor eve r yt w o p oi nt s $ x$ an d $y$  in  ${\ens uremath{\m ath ca l H}}$ and e v er y $\lambda \in \ ]0,1[$ suc h t hat $( 1- \la m bda)x +\l ambda  y\in{ \ ensure math{\ope ra t orname { dom}}}f $ ,  $ $\la bel{uniform smoot h ne s s}
f\big((1-\l ambda) x+ \ la m b day\b ig)+\lambd a( 1-\la m bda)\ps i \b i g ( \|x - y\|\big)\geq( 1-\lambda)f ( x)+ \lambd af(y ) .$$ Th e sma ll e stpossible fu ncti on $\psi$  satis f ying  i s  called  the * gau geof u n if or m s mo o thn e ss * o f  $f $ and is  d ef inedby $ $ \ p s i_f( t)= \sup \bigg \{\frac{(1-\l amb da)f ( x)+ \lamb da f( y)-f (( 1-\la mbda)x +\lam bd a y)}{\lambda(1 -\la mbda)}\ \ big g| \ \ be gin{a r ray}{c }
\ lam bda\in\  ]0,1[, \  x, y\ i n { \e nsuremath{\mathcal  H } } ,\  \|x-y\| =t, \\ 
\ bi g ((1-\lam bd a)x +\la m b da y\ big) \ in {\ensure math{\ o pe ra torname {d om}}}f 
\ end {ar ray}\  \bi gg\}.$ $

\[uni formc onvexity equiv a lent to unifo r mm o no t onic ity \]*[@Zal Th eore m  3.5 .10, (i )$\ L eftri ghtar ro w $( v )]* Suppose that $f :{ \ensur emath {\mathcal H}} \to{\ensur e m a th{\,\le ft]- \ in f ty,+\infty\rig ht]}} $ is prope r , lowersemic ontinuou s and con v e x. Then$f$  is  un ifo r m ly  convex if an d only  i f $\par tia l f$ is  un ifo rml y m on otone, in  which c as e$\ pa rti al f$ is ${\en su rem at h{\ varph i }}$-un iform ly m on ot o newith ${ \ en s u rema th {\ varp hi} }= 2{\en sure m ath {\varph i}}_f^{** }$. 
Con se qu ently,we arrive atth e followin gres ults:\ [uniform  convexity is dominanto r reces siv e\] * **(u niform co nve xity i s d o minant  w.r.t . $p_ \m u$) * * * Sup p o se  th at  for each$ i \in  I$,$f _i:{ \ensure math{\mathcal H}}\ t o{\ ensuremath{\, \le ft]- \ i nf ty, + \i n fty \r i ght ] } }$ is proper, l ower semic on t in uous, conv e x a nd  thereexists$i_0\ 
 if_there exists_a function $\psi:[0,\infty[\to[0,\infty]$ with_the property_$\lim_{t\to_0}{\psi(t)}/{t}=0$ such_that_for every two_points $x$ and_$y$ in ${\ensuremath{\mathcal H}}$_and every $\lambda\in\_]0,1[$_such that $(1-\lambda)x+\lambda y\in{\ensuremath{\operatorname{dom}}}f$, $$\label{uniform smoothness}
f\big((1-\lambda)x+\lambda y\big)+\lambda(1-\lambda)\psi\big(\|x-y\|\big)\geq(1-\lambda)f(x)+\lambda f(y).$$ The smallest possible function $\psi$ satisfying _is_called the_*gauge_of_uniform smoothness* of $f$ and_is defined by $$\psi_f(t)=\sup\bigg\{\frac{(1-\lambda)f(x)+\lambda f(y)-f((1-\lambda)x+\lambda_y)}{\lambda(1-\lambda)}\ \bigg|\_\begin{array}{c}
\lambda\in\ ]0,1[,\ x,y\in{\ensuremath{\mathcal H}},\ \|x-y\|=t, \\ 
\big((1-\lambda)x+\lambda y\big)\in{\ensuremath{\operatorname{dom}}}f
\end{array}\__\bigg\}.$$

\[uniform convexity equivalent_to uniform monotonicity\]*[@Zal Theorem 3.5.10, (i)$\Leftrightarrow$(v)]* Suppose that $f:{\ensuremath{\mathcal_H}}\to{\ensuremath{\,\left]-\infty,+\infty\right]}}$ is proper, lower semicontinuous and_convex. Then $f$_is_uniformly_convex if and only_if $\partial f$ is uniformly monotone,_in which case $\partial f$ is_${\ensuremath{\varphi}}$-uniformly monotone with ${\ensuremath{\varphi}}=2{\ensuremath{\varphi}}_f^{**}$.

Consequently, we arrive at_the following results:

\[uniform convexity is dominant_or recessive\] ***(uniform convexity is_dominant w.r.t._$p_\mu$)*** Suppose that for each_$i\in I$, $f_i:{\ensuremath{\mathcal_H}}\to{\ensuremath{\,\left]-\infty,+\infty\right]}}$ is_proper, lower semicontinuous,_convex and there exists $i_0\