 the overlap corresponding to spin-uncorrelated noise essentially follows the purely spatial overlap, $\Omega_s\sim\Omega_\mathrm{max}$. All forms of the overlap reach a common minimum just beyond the critical field $B\gtrsim B_c$, and then *grow* together in an oscillatory fashion, out of phase with the splitting (blue curve). Namely, MZMs deep in the topological regime [enjoy *less protection*]{} than the ones near $B_c$ (compare wavefunctions at $B_2$ and $B_3$).

In the two uniform nanowires simulated in panels (a,b) we see how the estimator $\eta$ (black curve) roughly traces the overlap $\Omega_s$, particularly around the $B\gtrsim B_c$ region of minimal overlap. This good correlation corresponds to two particular configurations of the uniform Lutchyn-Oreg model. To fully assess the overall correlation between $\eta$ and $\Omega_s$ for arbitrary configurations, we simulate an ensemble of $\sim 2\cdot 10^4$ uniform nanowires with varying model parameters, including $B$, $\alpha$, $L$, $\mu$ and $\Delta$, distributed uniformly within realistic ranges (see caption). Amongst all configurations, we select those with a near zero mode (splitting $E_0<10\mu$eV) well separated from higher excitations (second eigenvalue greater than $50\mu$eV). This preselection is experimentally feasible at temperatures below $\sim 100$mK using local tunnel spectroscopy. In the uniform case it excludes in particular any field in the trivial regime $B<B_c$. We then compute the $(\eta, \Omega_s)$ pair for the near-zero modes in the ensemble and collect all these points (see Fig. \[fig:uniform\]c) to build the probability density $P(\eta,\Omega_s)$ that a given zero mode with a measured $\eta$ have a given $\Omega_s$. The probability $P(\eta,\Omega_s)$ is shown in Fig. \[fig:uniform\]d. Its profile gives an accurate account of the quality of $\eta$ as an estimator of $\Omega_s$ within the whole space of uniform Lutchyn-Oreg nanowire models with near zero modes. A perfect correlation would appear as a straight, thin $P(\eta,\Omega_s)$ along the diagonal. We see that while the actual dependence of the typical $\Omega
the overlap corresponding to spin - uncorrelated noise basically take after the purely spatial overlap, $ \Omega_s\sim\Omega_\mathrm{max}$. All form of the lap reach a common minimum just beyond the critical plain $ B\gtrsim B_c$, and then * grow * together in an oscillatory manner, out of phase with the splitting (aristocratic curve). Namely, MZMs deeply in the topological regime [ enjoy * less protection * ] { } than the ones near $ B_c$ (comparison wavefunctions at $ B_2 $ and $ B_3 $). 

 In the two uniform nanowires simulated in panel (a, b) we see how the estimator $ \eta$ (bootleg curve) roughly traces the lap $ \Omega_s$, particularly around the $ B\gtrsim B_c$ region of minimal overlap. This good correlation match to two particular configurations of the uniform Lutchyn - Oreg model. To fully measure the overall correlation between $ \eta$ and $ \Omega_s$ for arbitrary configurations, we simulate an ensemble of $ \sim 2\cdot 10 ^ 4 $ uniform nanowires with varying model parameters, including $ B$, $ \alpha$, $ L$, $ \mu$ and $ \Delta$, distributed uniformly within realistic ranges (see caption). Amongst all configurations, we select those with a near zero manner (splitting $ E_0<10\mu$eV) well separated from high excitations (second eigenvalue greater than $ 50\mu$eV). This preselection is experimentally feasible at temperatures below $ \sim 100$mK using local burrow spectroscopy. In the uniform shell it excludes in particular any airfield in the trivial regime $ B < B_c$. We then compute the $ (\eta, \Omega_s)$ pair for the dear - zero modes in the ensemble and collect all these points (see Fig. \[fig: uniform\]c) to build up the probability density $ P(\eta,\Omega_s)$ that a establish zero mode with a measured $ \eta$ have a given $ \Omega_s$. The probability $ P(\eta,\Omega_s)$ is shown in Fig. \[fig: uniform\]d. Its visibility gives an accurate account of the quality of $ \eta$ as an estimator of $ \Omega_s$ within the whole space of uniform Lutchyn - Oreg nanowire models with near zero modes. A arrant correlation would appear as a straight, thin $ P(\eta,\Omega_s)$ along the diagonal. We attend that while the actual dependence of the distinctive $ \Omega
 thf overlap corresponding uo spin-uncorrelatgd noise essenfially fullows the purely spatial ovxrlap, $\Ometa_s\sim\Omega_\mathrm{max}$. Aul forms lf the ocerlep reach a commoi minimum just neyonb vhe critical figld $B\gtrsim T_c$, and then *grmw* tlgether in an oscillatory fashion, ott of pnade with the spjittpnd (blhv gurve). Namely, MZMs deep in the tolologicel regime [enjoy *less protection*]{} than the lnes near $B_c$ (compare wwvefunctionw at $V_2$ and $B_3$).

In thd two uniform nanowirea simulated in panels (a,b) we see how che estimatir $\etw$ (black curvx) rougrly traces tmv overldp $\Omegs_s$, particularln aronnd rhe $B\gtrsim B_c$ region of minimal overlak. This goog eorrelation correspones to tfo pdrtizylaf cknhighratiojs kf the unirorm Lutchyb-Oreg model. To fullu wwsess the ovedall cjrwelation between $\eta$ and $\Omega_s$ for arbptrady configurations, we sinulate an ensemble of $\sim 2\cdot 10^4$ uniform nanowires with varying model parameters, inclndkng $B$, $\xopja$, $L$, $\mu$ and $\Delta$, distributed uniformly withig rtalpstic ranges (see gaption). Amongst alk fomsigurations, wg selecc tgose with a near zfro modg (splirting $E_0<10\mu$tV) wekl separated from higher exxitations (sebond eigenvalue greatex than $50\mu$eV). Chis pteselevtion is experimentally feaaible at telperaturea below $\sim 100$mK uskng lmcal tunnel spectroscopy. Ig the unihorm ease it dxclodes in particulag any field in the triviwl reyime $T<B_c$. We thej compute the $(\eta, \Omega_s)$ pair for the near-zerp kodvs in the ensekble and collqct all these koints (sez Fig. \[wig:uniform\]b) to builv the probabylity density $K(\eta,\Omega_s)$ thet a giveg zeeo mide witf a measured $\ets$ have a ynven $\Omegq_s$. The probability $P(\eja,\Kmega_s)$ is shown in Fig. \[fig:uniform\]c. Igs [rlfmle gyees an accurdte xccuint ow the qualiby uf $\eya$ as an estimator ox $\Omsga_s$ within the whplc space od unifori Lutchyn-Oreg nanowire models wlth nxar zeco modrs. W perfect correlation would aplear as a stvaight, thin $P(\qta,\Onega_s)$ along che diagonal. We see that while the actuao dependence of thw typical $\Omega
the overlap corresponding to spin-uncorrelated noise essentially purely overlap, $\Omega_s\sim\Omega_\mathrm{max}$. forms of the just the critical field B_c$, and then together in an oscillatory fashion, out phase with the splitting (blue curve). Namely, MZMs deep in the topological regime *less protection*]{} than the ones near $B_c$ (compare wavefunctions at $B_2$ and $B_3$). the uniform simulated panels (a,b) we see how the estimator $\eta$ (black curve) roughly traces the overlap $\Omega_s$, particularly the $B\gtrsim B_c$ region of minimal overlap. This correlation corresponds to two configurations of the uniform Lutchyn-Oreg To assess the correlation $\eta$ $\Omega_s$ for arbitrary we simulate an ensemble of $\sim 2\cdot 10^4$ uniform nanowires with varying model parameters, including $B$, $\alpha$, $\mu$ and uniformly within ranges caption). all configurations, we with a near zero mode (splitting from higher excitations (second eigenvalue greater than $50\mu$eV). preselection is feasible at temperatures below $\sim 100$mK local tunnel spectroscopy. In the uniform case it in particular any field in the trivial regime $B<B_c$. We then compute the $(\eta, \Omega_s)$ the near-zero modes in ensemble and collect these (see \[fig:uniform\]c) build the density $P(\eta,\Omega_s)$ that a given zero mode with a measured $\eta$ a given $\Omega_s$. The probability $P(\eta,\Omega_s)$ is shown in Fig. profile an accurate account the quality of $\eta$ an of $\Omega_s$ within the of Lutchyn-Oreg near modes. perfect correlation would appear a straight, thin $P(\eta,\Omega_s)$ along diagonal. We see that the typical $\Omega
 the overlap corresponding to Spin-uncorrElateD noIse EsSentIallY follows the purELy spAtial overlap, $\Omega_s\sim\OMega_\mAtHRm{maX}$. alL formS of the oVErLAP reAcH a ComMoN MiNimum JusT beyond The criticaL fiElD $B\gtrsim B_c$, anD ThEn *grow* togeTheR in an oscillaTorY fashiOn, Out OF phasE wiTh the SplittINg (blue Curve). NameLy, mzMs deeP In the toPOLoGicaL regime [enjoy *less pROtECtion*]{} than the onEs near $b_c$ (COmPARe wAveFunctions aT $B_2$ And $B_3$).

IN The two uNIfORM NanOWires simulateD in panels (a,b) WE seE how thE eStiMAtor $\etA$ (blacK cURve) Roughly tracEs thE overlap $\OMega_s$, pARticulaRLy arounD the $B\gTrsIm B_C$ regIOn Of MinImAL ovERlAp. THIs gOod correLaTiOn corRespONDS To twO paRticUlar cOnfigurations Of tHe unIForM LutcHyn-OrEg moDeL. To fuLly assEss thE oVerall correlatiOn beTween $\eta$ aNd $\OMeGa_s$ FoR arbiTRary coNfiGurAtions, wE simulaTE an EnSEMBlE of $\sim 2\cdot 10^4$ uniform nAnOWIrEs with vaRying mODeL pARameters, InCluDing $b$, $\ALpha$, $L$, $\Mu$ anD $\deLta$, distrIbuted UNiFoRmly witHiN realiStIc rAngEs (see CAptiOn). AmonGst all coNfiguRAtions, we select THose with a near ZErO MOdE (SpliTtiNg $E_0<10\mu$eV) well SepaRAted From HIgHer EXcitaTions (SeCOnD Eigenvalue greater thAn $50\Mu$eV). ThIs preSelection is exPerimentalLY FEasible aT temPErATures below $\sim 100$mk usinG local tunnEL spectroScopy. in the uniForm case iT EXcludes iN paRtiCulAr aNY FiEld in the triviAL RegiMe $b<B_c$. We thEn cOmpute tHe $(\eTa, \OMegA_s)$ pAiR for the neAr-zero moDeS iN tHe EnsEmble ANd collecT aLl tHeSe pOints (SEe Fig. \[fIg:uniForm\]C) tO bUIld The probABiLITy deNsItY $P(\etA,\OmEgA_s)$ thaT a giVEn zEro mode With a measUreD $\Eta$ hAvE a Given $\OmEga_s$. The probabIlIty $P(\eta,\OmeGa_S)$ is Shown iN fIg. \[fig:uniForm\]d. Its profile gives an aCCurate aCcoUnt of The qUality of $\eTa$ aS an estImaTOr of $\OmEga_s$ wiThin tHe WhoLE Space OF UnIfoRm lutchyn-OreG NAnoWire mOdEls wIth near Zero modes. A perfect cORreLation would apPeaR as a STRaIghT, ThIN $P(\eTa,\oMegA_S)$ Along the diagonaL. We see that WhILe The actual dEPenDeNce of thE typicaL $\OmegA
 the overlap corresponding  to spin-u ncorr ela ted  n oise  ess entially follo w s th e purely spatial overl ap, $ \O m ega_ s \s im\Om ega_\ma t hr m { max }$ .All  f o rm s ofthe  overla p reach acom mo n minimum ju s tbeyond the  cr itical field  $B \gtrsi mB_c $ , and  th en *g row* t o gether  in an os ci l latory fashion , ou t of  phase with the s p li t ting (blue cur ve). N am e ly , MZM s d eep in the  t opolo g ical re g im e [ enj o y *less prote ction*]{} t h anthe on es  ne a r $B_c $ (co mp a rewavefunctio ns a t $B_2$ a nd $B_ 3 $).

In the two  unifo rmnan owir e ssi mul at e d i n  p ane l s ( a,b) wese ehow t he e s t i m ator  $\ eta$  (bla ck curve) rou ghl y tr a ces  theoverl ap $ \O mega_ s$, pa rticu la rly around the$B\g trsim B_c $ r eg ion  o f min i mal ov erl ap.  This g ood cor r ela ti o n co rresponds to two p ar t i cu lar conf igurat i on so f the un if orm  Lut c h yn-Or eg m o de l. To fu lly as s es sthe ove ra ll cor re lat ion  betw e en $ \eta$and $\Om ega_s $  for arbitrary configuration s ,w e  s i mula tean ensemble  of$ \sim  2\c d ot  10 ^ 4$ un iform  n a no w ires with varying m od el par amete rs, including  $B$, $\al p h a $, $L$,$\mu $  a n d $\Delta$, di strib uted unifo r mly with in re alisticranges (s e e  caption ).Amo ngs t a l l  c onfigurations , we s el ect tho sewith anea r z ero  mo de  (splitti ng $E_0< 10 \m u$ eV ) w ell s e paratedfr omhi ghe r exc i tation s (se cond  e ig e nva lue gre a te r than  $ 50 \mu$ eV) .Thispres e lec tion is  experime nta l ly f ea si ble attemperaturesbe low $\sim10 0$m K usin g local tu nnel spectroscopy. In t h e unifo rmcaseit e xcludes i n p articu lar any fi eld in  thetr ivi a l  regi m e  $ B<B _c $. We then c omp ute t he  $(\ eta, \O mega_s)$ pair fort henear-zero mod esin t h e  e nse m bl e  an dc oll e c t all these poi nts (see F ig .  \ [fig:unifo r m\] c)  to bui ld theproba b ility d ensity $P (\eta,\Om eg a_s) $ tha t a givenzero mod e with am easur e d$\eta $ h ave agi ven  $\Om ega_s$ .  Th e pro babili ty  $P(\e ta,\O me ga_s)$ i s shown in Fig. \[fig:u niform \]d.Its  profilegiv e s a n accurat e ac count of t hequa lityof$ \eta$  asa nest i mator  of$ \Omega_s$ wi thi n th e whole spa c e ofunifo rmL utchyn -Ore g nanowire models with near zero  mod e s . A  pe r fect  c orrelation wou ldap p e ar as ast raight, thi n $P(\et a, \ Omega _s)$ a long t he diag o n al .  We se e th atwhile the  ac tu a l depen de nc e  of th e ty pi cal $\ Omega
 the_overlap corresponding_to spin-uncorrelated noise essentially_follows the_purely_spatial overlap,_$\Omega_s\sim\Omega_\mathrm{max}$._All forms of_the overlap reach_a common minimum just_beyond the critical_field_$B\gtrsim B_c$, and then *grow* together in an oscillatory fashion, out of phase with_the_splitting (blue_curve)._Namely,_MZMs deep in the topological_regime [enjoy *less protection*]{} than_the ones_near $B_c$ (compare wavefunctions at $B_2$ and $B_3$).

In_the_two uniform nanowires_simulated in panels (a,b) we see how the estimator_$\eta$ (black curve) roughly traces the_overlap $\Omega_s$, particularly_around_the_$B\gtrsim B_c$ region of_minimal overlap. This good correlation corresponds_to two particular configurations of the_uniform Lutchyn-Oreg model. To fully assess the_overall correlation between $\eta$ and $\Omega_s$_for arbitrary configurations, we simulate_an ensemble_of $\sim 2\cdot 10^4$ uniform_nanowires with varying_model parameters,_including $B$, $\alpha$,_$L$, $\mu$ and $\Delta$, distributed uniformly_within realistic ranges_(see caption). Amongst all configurations, we_select_those with a_near_zero_mode (splitting_$E_0<10\mu$eV) well separated_from_higher excitations_(second_eigenvalue greater than $50\mu$eV). This preselection_is_experimentally feasible at temperatures below $\sim 100$mK_using local tunnel spectroscopy._In_the uniform case it_excludes in particular any field_in the trivial regime $B<B_c$. We_then compute_the $(\eta,_\Omega_s)$ pair for the near-zero modes in the ensemble and collect_all these points (see Fig. \[fig:uniform\]c)_to build the probability_density $P(\eta,\Omega_s)$_that_a given zero_mode_with a_measured $\eta$ have a given $\Omega_s$. The_probability $P(\eta,\Omega_s)$_is shown in Fig. \[fig:uniform\]d. Its_profile gives an accurate_account_of the quality of $\eta$ as_an estimator of $\Omega_s$ within the_whole space of uniform Lutchyn-Oreg_nanowire_models_with near zero modes. A_perfect correlation would appear as a_straight, thin $P(\eta,\Omega_s)$_along the diagonal. We see that while_the_actual dependence of the typical $\Omega