}\mathbf{h}_{P,j}^H\Big)^{-1} \mathbf{h}_{Pk} \nonumber\\
   \triangleq & \sqrt{p_k^\star} \tilde{\mathbf{w}}_{d,k}^\star,\end{aligned}$$ where $\tilde{\mathbf{w}}_{d,k}^\star =  \big(\mathbf{I}_{N_t} + \sum_{j\neq k} \bar{\lambda}_j^\star \mathbf{h}_{P,j}\mathbf{h}_{P,j}^H\big)^{-1} \mathbf{h}_{Pk}$, and $p_k^\star$ is a scalar controlling the power allocated to ${\text{PUE}}_k$ for transmitting desired signals.

To find the optimal $\{p_k^\star\}$ in (\[E:opt-wtk\]), recalling that the optimal solution to problem (\[E:problem-MU-reform-feasibility-reform\]) is obtained when all SINR constraints in (\[E:constraint-SINR-feasibility-reform\]) hold with equality if problem (\[E:problem-MU-reform-feasibility-reform\]) is feasible for given {$\gamma_k$}, then we can obtain the following equations with respect to $p_k^\star$ $$\begin{aligned}
 \label{E:opt-p}
    & \frac{p_k^\star|\mathbf{h}_{Pk}^H\tilde{\mathbf{w}}_{d,k}^\star|^2}{ \sum_{j\neq k} p_j^\star\|\mathbf{h}_{Pk}^H \tilde{\mathbf{w}}_{t,j}^\star\|^2 \!+\! \zeta_k(\mathbf{W}_f^\star)} \!= \!\gamma_k,\  k \!=\! 1,\dots, {K_P},\end{aligned}$$ where $\zeta_k(\mathbf{W}_f^\star) = \|\bar{\mathbf{h}}_{Mk}^H + \mathbf{h}_{Pk}^H \mathbf{W}_f^\star \bar{\mathbf{H}}_{MP}^H e^{-j\phi}\|^2  + |\mathbf{h}_{Pk}^H \mathbf{W}_f^\star|^2(\sigma_I^2+\sigma_n^2) + \sigma_n^2$.

} \mathbf{h}_{P, j}^H\Big)^{-1 } \mathbf{h}_{Pk } \nonumber\\ 
    \triangleq & \sqrt{p_k^\star } \tilde{\mathbf{w}}_{d, k}^\star,\end{aligned}$$ where $ \tilde{\mathbf{w}}_{d, k}^\star =   \big(\mathbf{I}_{N_t } + \sum_{j\neq k } \bar{\lambda}_j^\star \mathbf{h}_{P, j}\mathbf{h}_{P, j}^H\big)^{-1 } \mathbf{h}_{Pk}$, and $ p_k^\star$ is a scalar controlling the power allocated to $ { \text{PUE}}_k$ for transmitting desire signal. 

 To find the optimal $ \{p_k^\star\}$ in (\[E: opt - wtk\ ]), recalling that the optimum solution to problem (\[E: problem - MU - reform - feasibility - reform\ ]) is obtained when all SINR constraint in (\[E: constraint - SINR - feasibility - reform\ ]) hold with equality if trouble (\[E: trouble - MU - reform - feasibility - reform\ ]) is feasible for given { $ \gamma_k$ }, then we can obtain the keep up equations with obedience to $ p_k^\star$ $ $ \begin{aligned } 
  \label{E: opt - p } 
     & \frac{p_k^\star|\mathbf{h}_{Pk}^H\tilde{\mathbf{w}}_{d, k}^\star|^2 } { \sum_{j\neq k } p_j^\star\|\mathbf{h}_{Pk}^H \tilde{\mathbf{w}}_{t, j}^\star\|^2 \!+\! \zeta_k(\mathbf{W}_f^\star) } \!= \!\gamma_k,\   k \!=\! 1,\dots, { K_P},\end{aligned}$$ where $ \zeta_k(\mathbf{W}_f^\star) = \|\bar{\mathbf{h}}_{Mk}^H + \mathbf{h}_{Pk}^H \mathbf{W}_f^\star \bar{\mathbf{H}}_{MP}^H e^{-j\phi}\|^2   + |\mathbf{h}_{Pk}^H \mathbf{W}_f^\star|^2(\sigma_I^2+\sigma_n^2) + \sigma_n^2$.
}\matjbf{h}_{P,j}^H\Big)^{-1} \mathbf{h}_{Pk} \nonmmber\\
   \triangleq & \sqrt{'_k^\star} \filde{\matfbf{w}}_{d,k}^\star,\end{aligned}$$ where $\tmlde{\nathbd{w}}_{d,k}^\star =  \big(\mathbf{I}_{N_g} + \sum_{j\nee k} \bar{\lqmbde}_j^\star \mathbf{h}_{P,j}\mathbf{h}_{P,m}^K\big)^{-1} \jwthby{h}_{'k}$, and $p_k^\star$ ix a scalar controlling tve plwer allocated to ${\text{PUE}}_k$ for tranfmittinb fesired signalf.

To gynd fhe optimal $\{p_k^\star\}$ in (\[E:opt-wtk\]), recamling tiat the optimal solution to problem (\[E:probpem-MK-reform-feasibility-geform\]) is ovtaigwd when all RINR constgcints in (\[E:cknstraint-SINR-feasibility-reform\]) fold cith equalijv if kroblem (\[E:proulem-MU-geform-feasibility-refosm\]) is frasible for giyen {$\gemma_j$}, then we can obtain vhe following equatijns with seapect to $p_k^\star$ $$\bwgun{alicned}
 \labdo{E:oot-p}
    & \frac{p_n^\ster|\mathbf{h}_{Pk}^G\tilde{\mathbd{w}}_{d,k}^\star|^2}{ \sum_{j\neq k} k_j^\seqr\|\mathbf{h}_{Pk}^H \filde{\mwtrbf{w}}_{t,j}^\star\|^2 \!+\! \zeta_k(\mathbf{W}_f^\star)} \!= \!\gamma_k,\  n \!=\! 1,\sots, {K_P},\end{aligned}$$ where $\zeta_k(\mathbf{W}_f^\star) = \|\bwr{\mathbf{h}}_{Ik}^H + \mathbf{h}_{Pk}^H \mathbf{W}_f^\star \bar{\mathbf{H}}_{MP}^H e^{-j\phi}\|^2  + |\matibw{h}_{Pj}^H \oqtjbf{W}_f^\star|^2(\sigma_I^2+\sigma_n^2) + \sigma_n^2$.

}\mathbf{h}_{P,j}^H\Big)^{-1} \mathbf{h}_{Pk} \nonumber\\ \triangleq & \sqrt{p_k^\star} \tilde{\mathbf{w}}_{d,k}^\star,\end{aligned}$$ = + \sum_{j\neq \bar{\lambda}_j^\star \mathbf{h}_{P,j}\mathbf{h}_{P,j}^H\big)^{-1} \mathbf{h}_{Pk}$, controlling power allocated to for transmitting desired To find the optimal $\{p_k^\star\}$ in recalling that the optimal solution to problem (\[E:problem-MU-reform-feasibility-reform\]) is obtained when all SINR in (\[E:constraint-SINR-feasibility-reform\]) hold with equality if problem (\[E:problem-MU-reform-feasibility-reform\]) is feasible for given {$\gamma_k$}, we obtain following with respect to $p_k^\star$ $$\begin{aligned} \label{E:opt-p} & \frac{p_k^\star|\mathbf{h}_{Pk}^H\tilde{\mathbf{w}}_{d,k}^\star|^2}{ \sum_{j\neq k} p_j^\star\|\mathbf{h}_{Pk}^H \tilde{\mathbf{w}}_{t,j}^\star\|^2 \!+\! \zeta_k(\mathbf{W}_f^\star)} \!= \!\gamma_k,\ \!=\! 1,\dots, {K_P},\end{aligned}$$ where $\zeta_k(\mathbf{W}_f^\star) = \|\bar{\mathbf{h}}_{Mk}^H + \mathbf{W}_f^\star \bar{\mathbf{H}}_{MP}^H e^{-j\phi}\|^2 + \mathbf{W}_f^\star|^2(\sigma_I^2+\sigma_n^2) + \sigma_n^2$.
}\mathbf{h}_{P,j}^H\Big)^{-1} \mathbf{h}_{Pk} \nonUmber\\
   \trianGleq & \sQrt{P_k^\sTaR} \tilDe{\maThbf{w}}_{d,k}^\star,\end{ALignEd}$$ where $\tilde{\mathbf{w}}_{d,k}^\sTar =  \biG(\mAThbf{i}_{n_t} + \Sum_{j\nEq k} \bar{\lAMbDA}_J^\stAr \MaThbF{h}_{p,J}\mAthbf{H}_{P,j}^h\big)^{-1} \matHbf{h}_{Pk}$, and $p_K^\stAr$ Is a scalar conTRoLling the poWer Allocated to ${\tExt{pUE}}_k$ foR tRanSMittiNg dEsireD signaLS.

To finD the optimAl $\{P_K^\star\}$ iN (\[e:opt-wtk\]), RECaLlinG that the optimal soLUtIOn to problem (\[E:prOblem-Mu-rEFoRM-FeaSibIlity-reforM\]) iS obtaINed when ALl sinr coNStraints in (\[E:coNstraint-SINr-FeaSibiliTy-RefORm\]) hold With eQuALitY if problem (\[E:ProbLem-MU-refoRm-feasIBility-rEForm\]) is fEasiblE foR giVen {$\gAMmA_k$}, TheN wE Can OBtAin THe fOllowing EqUaTions With RESPEct tO $p_k^\Star$ $$\Begin{Aligned}
 \label{E:Opt-P}
    & \fraC{P_k^\sTar|\maThbf{h}_{pk}^H\tIlDe{\matHbf{w}}_{d,k}^\Star|^2}{ \sUm_{J\neq k} p_j^\star\|\mathBf{h}_{PK}^H \tilde{\maThbF{w}}_{T,j}^\sTaR\|^2 \!+\! \zeta_K(\Mathbf{w}_f^\sTar)} \!= \!\Gamma_k,\  k \!=\! 1,\Dots, {K_P},\eND{alIgNED}$$ WhEre $\zeta_k(\mathbf{W}_f^\stAr) = \|\BAR{\mAthbf{h}}_{Mk}^h + \mathbF{H}_{PK}^H \MAthbf{W}_f^\sTaR \baR{\matHBF{H}}_{MP}^H E^{-j\phI}\|^2  + |\MaThbf{h}_{Pk}^H \Mathbf{w}_F^\sTaR|^2(\sigma_I^2+\SiGma_n^2) + \siGmA_n^2$.

}\mathbf{h}_{P,j}^H\Big)^{ -1} \mathb f{h}_ {Pk } \ no numb er\\ 
   \triangleq & \s qrt{p_k^\star} \tilde{ \math bf { w}}_ { d, k}^\s tar,\en d {a l i gne d} $$  wh er e  $ \tild e{\ mathbf{ w}}_{d,k}^ \st ar  =  \big(\ma t hb f{I}_{N_t}  +\sum_{j\neqk}\bar{\ la mbd a }_j^\ sta r \ma thbf{h } _{P,j} \mathbf{h }_ { P,j}^H \ big)^{- 1 }  \ math bf{h}_{Pk}$, and$ p_ k ^\star$ is a s calarco n tr o l lin g t he power a ll ocate d  to ${\ t ex t { P UE} } _k$ for trans mitting des i red  signa ls .
T o find  theop t ima l $\{p_k^\s tar\ }$ in (\[ E:opt- w tk\]),r ecallin g that  th e o ptim a lso lut io n  to pr obl e m ( \[E:prob le m- MU-re form - f e a sibi lit y-re form\ ]) is obtaine d w hena llSINRconst rain ts  in ( \[E:co nstra in t-SINR-feasibil ity- reform\])  ho ld  wi th  equa l ity if  pr obl em (\[E :proble m -MU -r e f o rm -feasibility-refor m\ ] )  i s feasib le for gi ve n  {$\gamm a_ k$} , th e n  we c an o b ta in the f ollowi n geq uations  w ith re sp ect  to  $p_k ^ \sta r$ $$\ begin{al igned } 
 \label{E:opt - p}
    & \fra c {p _ k ^\ s tar| \ma thbf{h}_{Pk }^H\ t ilde {\ma t hb f{w } }_{d, k}^\s ta r |^ 2 }{ \sum_{j\neq k} p _j ^\star \|\ma thbf{h}_{Pk}^ H \tilde{\ m a t hbf{w}}_ {t,j } ^\ s tar\|^2 \!+\!\zeta _k(\mathbf { W}_f^\st ar)}\!= \!\g amma_k,\k  \!=\! 1 ,\d ots , { K_P } , \e nd{aligned}$$ w here  $ \zeta_k (\m athbf{W }_f ^\s tar ) =  \ |\bar{\ma thbf{h}} _{ Mk }^ H+ \ mathb f {h}_{Pk} ^H  \m at hbf {W}_f ^ \star\bar{ \mat hb f{ H }}_ {MP}^He ^{ - j \phi }\ |^ 2  +  |\ ma thbf{ h}_{ P k}^ H \math bf{W}_f^\ sta r |^2( \s ig ma_I^2+ \sigma_n^2) +  \ sigma_n^2$ .
}\mathbf{h}_{P,j}^H\Big)^{-1} \mathbf{h}_{Pk}_\nonumber\\
 _ \triangleq & \sqrt{p_k^\star}_\tilde{\mathbf{w}}_{d,k}^\star,\end{aligned}$$ where_$\tilde{\mathbf{w}}_{d,k}^\star_= _\big(\mathbf{I}_{N_t}_+ \sum_{j\neq k}_\bar{\lambda}_j^\star \mathbf{h}_{P,j}\mathbf{h}_{P,j}^H\big)^{-1} \mathbf{h}_{Pk}$,_and $p_k^\star$ is a_scalar controlling the_power_allocated to ${\text{PUE}}_k$ for transmitting desired signals.

To find the optimal $\{p_k^\star\}$ in (\[E:opt-wtk\]), recalling_that_the optimal_solution_to_problem (\[E:problem-MU-reform-feasibility-reform\]) is obtained when_all SINR constraints in (\[E:constraint-SINR-feasibility-reform\])_hold with_equality if problem (\[E:problem-MU-reform-feasibility-reform\]) is feasible for given_{$\gamma_k$},_then we can_obtain the following equations with respect to $p_k^\star$ $$\begin{aligned}
_\label{E:opt-p}
    & \frac{p_k^\star|\mathbf{h}_{Pk}^H\tilde{\mathbf{w}}_{d,k}^\star|^2}{_\sum_{j\neq k} p_j^\star\|\mathbf{h}_{Pk}^H_\tilde{\mathbf{w}}_{t,j}^\star\|^2_\!+\!_\zeta_k(\mathbf{W}_f^\star)} \!= \!\gamma_k,\ _k \!=\! 1,\dots, {K_P},\end{aligned}$$ where $\zeta_k(\mathbf{W}_f^\star)_= \|\bar{\mathbf{h}}_{Mk}^H + \mathbf{h}_{Pk}^H \mathbf{W}_f^\star \bar{\mathbf{H}}_{MP}^H_e^{-j\phi}\|^2  + |\mathbf{h}_{Pk}^H \mathbf{W}_f^\star|^2(\sigma_I^2+\sigma_n^2) + \sigma_n^2$.
