, \ldots, b_m \rangle =E$ and $\mu (E)=n+m$. In particular, $\mu(U) \geq \mu (V)\geq {\ell(E)}$.

4.  The following are equivalent:

    1.  $V\subseteq E$ is a reduction and $\mu (V)={\ell(E)}$.

    2.  If $V=\langle a_1, \ldots,a_n \rangle$ with $n=\mu(V)$, then ${{{\overline}{a}}_1,\dotsc,{{\overline}{a}}_{n}} \in {{{\mathcal F}}(E)}$ is a homogeneous system of parameters.

    And if any of these two equivalent conditions holds, $V$ is a minimal reduction of $E$.

5.  If the residue field $k$ is infinite and $V\subseteq U$ is a minimal reduction, then conditions d1) and d2) hold. In particular, ${{{\mathcal F}}(V)}\subset {{{\mathcal F}}(E)}$ is a noether normalization of ${{{\mathcal F}}(E)}$ and $V^n \cap {{\mathfrak{m}}}E^n ={{\mathfrak{m}}}V^n$ for all $n\geq 0$.

As a consequence, minimal reductions always exist. The [*reduction number*]{} of $E$, denoted by $r(E)$, is the minimum of $r_{U}(E)$, where $U$ ranges over all minimal reductions of $E$.

\[hsop\] If the residue field is finite, a minimal set of generators of a minimal reduction of $E$ is not necessarily a homogeneous system of parameters of ${{{\mathcal F}}(E)}$. Nevertheless, there always exist homogeneous systems of parameters of ${{{\mathcal F}}(E)}$. This is equivalent to the existence of a family of elements $a_1\in E^{r_1}\setminus {{\mathfrak{m}}}E^{r_1}, \ldots, a_s\in E^{r_s}\setminus {{\mathfrak{m}}}E^{r_s}$, where $s={\ell(E)}$, such that for some $r$, $E^r=a_1E^{r-r_1}+ \cdots +
a_sE^{r-r_s}$; and ${\ell(E)}$ is the minimum positive number for a such family of elements to exist.

\[as0\] Let ${(R,{{\mathfrak{m}}}, {
, \ldots, b_m \rangle = E$ and $ \mu (E)=n+m$. In particular, $ \mu(U) \geq \mu (V)\geq { \ell(E)}$. 

 4.   The following are equivalent: 

     1.   $ V\subseteq E$ is a reduction and $ \mu (V)={\ell(E)}$. 

     2.   If $ V=\langle a_1, \ldots, a_n \rangle$ with $ n=\mu(V)$, then $ { { { \overline}{a}}_1,\dotsc,{{\overline}{a}}_{n } } \in { { { \mathcal F}}(E)}$ is a homogeneous system of argument. 

     And if any of these two equivalent condition holds, $ V$ is a minimal decrease of $ E$. 

 5.   If the residue field $ k$ is countless and $ V\subseteq U$ is a minimal reduction, then conditions d1) and d2) detention. In finical, $ { { { \mathcal F}}(V)}\subset { { { \mathcal F}}(E)}$ is a noether normalization of $ { { { \mathcal F}}(E)}$ and $ V^n \cap { { \mathfrak{m}}}E^n = { { \mathfrak{m}}}V^n$ for all $ n\geq 0$. 

 As a consequence, minimal decrease always exist. The [ * reduction issue * ] { } of $ E$, denoted by $ r(E)$, is the minimum of $ r_{U}(E)$, where $ U$ ranges over all minimal reduction of $ E$. 

 \[hsop\ ] If the residue playing field is finite, a minimal set of generator of a minimal reduction of $ E$ is not necessarily a homogeneous arrangement of parameters of $ { { { \mathcal F}}(E)}$. Nevertheless, there always exist homogeneous systems of parameter of $ { { { \mathcal F}}(E)}$. This is equivalent to the existence of a family of elements $ a_1\in E^{r_1}\setminus { { \mathfrak{m}}}E^{r_1 }, \ldots, a_s\in E^{r_s}\setminus { { \mathfrak{m}}}E^{r_s}$, where $ s={\ell(E)}$, such that for some $ r$, $ E^r = a_1E^{r - r_1}+ \cdots + 
 a_sE^{r - r_s}$; and $ { \ell(E)}$ is the minimum convinced number for a such family of elements to exist. 

 \[as0\ ] Let $ { (R,{{\mathfrak{m } } }, {
, \ldlts, b_m \rangle =E$ and $\mu (E)=k+m$. In particular, $\mu(U) \gex \mu (V)\feq {\ell(E)}$.

4.  The following are equivaleit:

    1.  $V\wubseteq E$ is a reductkon and $\ml (V)={\ell(E)}$.

    2.  Mf $V=\langle a_1, \ldova,a_n \rannje$ wjbh $n=\mb(V)$, then ${{{\overline}{s}}_1,\dotsc,{{\overnine}{a}}_{n}} \in {{{\mathwau Y}}(E)}$ is a homogeneous system of parameeers.

    Ajd if any of trese ewo squivalent conditions holds, $V$ is a miniman reduction og $E$.

5.  If the residue field $n$ is infinite and $V\subdeteq U$ is q migumal reductiun, then conditions d1) ahd d2) hold. In particular, ${{{\mathcal F}}(V)}\suyset {{{\mathcao D}}(E)}$ lv a noether normwlization of ${{{\mathcal F}}(E)}$ and $V^n \cap {{\mathfrsk{m}}}X^n ={{\mqthfrak{m}}}V^n$ for all $n\gxq 0$.

As a consequence, iinimal radbctions always exist. Rhw [*redoctiot nuover*]{} of $E$, dsnoted by $r(E)$, is the minimum of $r_{U}(E)$, where $U$ ranges odvt all minimam redustyons of $E$.

\[hsop\] If the residue field is fpnits, a minimal set of geneeators of a minimal rgduction os $E$ is not necessarily a homogeneous system of pasametxrr oy ${{{\mathzql F}}(E)}$. Nevertheless, there always exist homogeneota xyxtems of paramcters of ${{{\mathcal F}}(R)}$. Hhof is equivalevt to cge existence of a falily of elemwnts $a_1\in T^{r_1}\setkinus {{\mathfrak{m}}}E^{r_1}, \ldots, a_s\ib E^{r_s}\setminuf {{\mathfrak{m}}}E^{r_s}$, wherz $s={\ell(E)}$, such thaj for xome $r$, $E^r=a_1E^{r-r_1}+ \cdots +
a_sE^{x-r_s}$; ans ${\ell(E)}$ is tje minimuj positive number fog a vuch family of elements to exist.

\[as0\] Oet ${(X,{{\mathfray{m}}}, {
, \ldots, b_m \rangle =E$ and $\mu particular, \geq \mu {\ell(E)}$. 4. The E$ a reduction and (V)={\ell(E)}$. 2. If a_1, \ldots,a_n \rangle$ with $n=\mu(V)$, then \in {{{\mathcal F}}(E)}$ is a homogeneous system of parameters. And if any of two equivalent conditions holds, $V$ is a minimal reduction of $E$. 5. If residue $k$ infinite $V\subseteq U$ is a minimal reduction, then conditions d1) and d2) hold. In particular, ${{{\mathcal F}}(V)}\subset F}}(E)}$ is a noether normalization of ${{{\mathcal F}}(E)}$ $V^n \cap {{\mathfrak{m}}}E^n ={{\mathfrak{m}}}V^n$ all $n\geq 0$. As a minimal always exist. [*reduction of denoted by $r(E)$, the minimum of $r_{U}(E)$, where $U$ ranges over all minimal reductions of $E$. \[hsop\] If the residue is finite, set of of minimal of $E$ is a homogeneous system of parameters of there always exist homogeneous systems of parameters of F}}(E)}$. This equivalent to the existence of a of elements $a_1\in E^{r_1}\setminus {{\mathfrak{m}}}E^{r_1}, \ldots, a_s\in E^{r_s}\setminus where $s={\ell(E)}$, such that for some $r$, $E^r=a_1E^{r-r_1}+ \cdots + a_sE^{r-r_s}$; and ${\ell(E)}$ is the number for a such of elements to \[as0\] ${(R,{{\mathfrak{m}}},
, \ldots, b_m \rangle =E$ and $\mu (E)=n+m$. In pArticular, $\mU(U) \geq \Mu (V)\Geq {\ElL(E)}$.

4.  ThE folLowing are equivALent:

    1.  $v\subseteq E$ is a reduction And $\mu (v)={\eLL(E)}$.

    2.  If $v=\LaNgle a_1, \Ldots,a_n \RAnGLE$ wiTh $N=\mU(V)$, tHeN ${{{\OvErlinE}{a}}_1,\dOtsc,{{\oveRline}{a}}_{n}} \in {{{\mAthCaL F}}(E)}$ is a homogeNEoUs system of ParAmeters.

    And if Any Of thesE tWo eQUivalEnt CondiTions hOLds, $V$ is A minimal rEdUCtion oF $e$.

5.  If the rESIdUe fiEld $k$ is infinite and $v\SuBSeteq U$ is a minimAl reduCtIOn, THEn cOndItions d1) and D2) hOld. In PArticulAR, ${{{\mATHCal f}}(v)}\subset {{{\mathcaL F}}(E)}$ is a noethER noRmalizAtIon OF ${{{\mathcAl F}}(E)}$ aNd $v^N \caP {{\mathfrak{m}}}E^N ={{\matHfrak{m}}}V^n$ fOr all $n\GEq 0$.

As a coNSequencE, minimAl rEduCtioNS aLwAys ExISt. THE [*rEduCTioN number*]{} oF $E$, DeNoted By $r(E)$, IS THE minImuM of $r_{u}(E)$, wheRe $U$ ranges over All MiniMAl rEductIons oF $E$.

\[hsOp\] if the ResiduE fielD iS finite, a minimal Set oF generatoRs oF a MinImAl redUCtion oF $E$ iS noT necessArily a hOMogEnEOUS sYstem of parameters oF ${{{\mATHcAl F}}(E)}$. NeveRtheleSS, tHeRE always eXiSt hOmogENEous sYsteMS oF parametErs of ${{{\mAThCaL F}}(E)}$. This Is EquivaLeNt tO thE exisTEnce Of a famIly of eleMents $A_1\In E^{r_1}\setminus {{\maTHfrak{m}}}E^{r_1}, \ldots, A_S\iN e^{R_s}\SEtmiNus {{\Mathfrak{m}}}E^{r_S}$, wheRE $s={\elL(E)}$, suCH tHat FOr somE $r$, $E^r=a_1e^{r-R_1}+ \CdOTs +
a_sE^{r-r_s}$; and ${\ell(E)}$ is thE mInimum PositIve number for a Such family OF ELements tO exiST.

\[aS0\] let ${(R,{{\mathfrak{m}}}, {
, \ldots, b_m \rangle =E$and $\mu ( E)=n+ m$.  In  p arti cula r, $\mu(U) \ge q  \mu  (V)\geq {\ell(E)}$.
4.  T he foll o wi ng ar e equiv a le n t :
  1. $ V \s ubset eqE$ is a  reduction  an d$\mu (V)={\e l l( E)}$.

   2.   If $V=\lan gle  a_1,\l dot s ,a_n\ra ngle$  with$ n=\mu( V)$, then  $ { {{\ove r line}{a } } _1 ,\do tsc,{{\overline}{ a }} _ {n}} \in {{{\m athcal  F } }( E ) }$isa homogene ou s sys t em of p a ra m e t ers . 

    And ifany of thes e  tw o equi va len t  condi tions  h o lds , $V$ is amini mal reduc tion o f  $E$.
5 .  If t he res idu e f ield $k $isin f ini t eand $V\ subseteq  U $is amini m a l redu cti on,thenconditions d1 ) a nd d 2 ) h old.In pa rtic ul ar, $ {{{\ma thcal  F }}(V)}\subset { {{\m athcal F} }(E )} $ i sa noe t her no rma liz ation o f ${{{\ m ath ca l F }} (E)}$ and $V^n \ca p{ { \m athfrak{ m}}}E^ n  = {{ \ mathfrak {m }}} V^n$ f or al l $n \ ge q 0$.

A s a co n se qu ence, m in imal r ed uct ion s alw a ys e xist.The [*re ducti o n number*]{} o f  $E$, denoted by $ r( E )$,isthe minimum  of$ r_{U }(E) $ ,whe r e $U$  rang es ov e r all minimal reduc ti ons of  $E$. 

\[hsop\] If  the resid u e field is  fin i te ,  a minimal set  of g eneratorso f a mini mal r eduction  of $E$ i s not nece ssa ril y a  ho m o ge neous systemo f  par am eters o f $ {{{\mat hca l F }}( E)} $.  Neverthe less, th er eal wa ysexist homogene ou s s ys tem s ofp aramet ers o f ${ {{ \m a thc al F}}( E )} $ .  Thi sis  equ iva le nt to  the exi stenceof a fami lyo f el em en ts $a_1 \in E^{r_1}\s et minus {{\m at hfr ak{m}} } E ^{r_1},\ldots, a_s\in E^{r_s}\ s etminus  {{ \math frak {m}}}E^{r _s} $, whe re$ s={\el l(E)}$ , suc htha t for s o m e$r$ ,$E^r=a_1E^ { r -r_ 1}+ \ cd ots+
a_sE^ {r-r_s}$; and ${\e l l(E )}$ is the mi nim um p o s it ive nu m ber  f o r a s uch family of e lements to  e x is t.

\[as0\ ]  Le t${(R,{{ \mathfr ak{m} } }, {
, \ldots,_b_m \rangle_=E$ and $\mu (E)=n+m$._In particular,_$\mu(U)_\geq \mu_(V)\geq_{\ell(E)}$.

4.  The_following are equivalent:

_   1._ $V\subseteq E$_is_a reduction and $\mu (V)={\ell(E)}$.

    2.  If $V=\langle a_1, \ldots,a_n_\rangle$_with $n=\mu(V)$,_then_${{{\overline}{a}}_1,\dotsc,{{\overline}{a}}_{n}}_\in {{{\mathcal F}}(E)}$ is a_homogeneous system of parameters.

 _ _And if any of these two equivalent conditions_holds,_$V$ is a_minimal reduction of $E$.

5.  If the residue field_$k$ is infinite and $V\subseteq U$_is a minimal_reduction,_then_conditions d1) and d2)_hold. In particular, ${{{\mathcal F}}(V)}\subset {{{\mathcal_F}}(E)}$ is a noether normalization of_${{{\mathcal F}}(E)}$ and $V^n \cap {{\mathfrak{m}}}E^n ={{\mathfrak{m}}}V^n$_for all $n\geq 0$.

As a consequence,_minimal reductions always exist. The_[*reduction number*]{}_of $E$, denoted by $r(E)$,_is the minimum_of $r_{U}(E)$,_where $U$ ranges_over all minimal reductions of $E$.

\[hsop\]_If the residue_field is finite, a minimal set_of_generators of a_minimal_reduction_of $E$_is not necessarily_a_homogeneous system_of_parameters of ${{{\mathcal F}}(E)}$. Nevertheless, there_always_exist homogeneous systems of parameters of ${{{\mathcal_F}}(E)}$. This is equivalent_to_the existence of a_family of elements $a_1\in E^{r_1}\setminus_{{\mathfrak{m}}}E^{r_1}, \ldots, a_s\in E^{r_s}\setminus {{\mathfrak{m}}}E^{r_s}$, where_$s={\ell(E)}$, such_that for_some $r$, $E^r=a_1E^{r-r_1}+ \cdots +
a_sE^{r-r_s}$; and ${\ell(E)}$ is the minimum positive_number for a such family of_elements to exist.

\[as0\] Let_${(R,{{\mathfrak{m}}}, {