 required to be less than 25%$\rts$ if one lepton is identified and less than 20%$\rts$ if more than one lepton is identified. Additionally, the cut on the leading lepton isolation is reinforced: the energy in a $30^{\circ}$ cone around the direction of the electron or muon momentum must be smaller than 2.7 times the electron or muon energy.

### Selection efficiency and background {#selection-efficiency-and-background-2.unnumbered}

The combination of the two selections is chosen according to the $\bar{N}_{95}$ procedure. For $\deltm$ $<$ 11 $\gev$, the logical OR of the two selections is used: the high $\deltm$ selection helps to recover efficiency while leaving the background level unchanged. For $\deltm$ $\geq$ 11 $\gev$, only the high $\deltm$ selection is used. This is in contrast to the situation for the 130–172 GeV data; because the background was low for both the low and the high $\deltm$ selections, the OR of the two selections was optimal for all $\deltm$.

The $\stop \to \rm{b} \ell \snu$ selection efficiencies are given in Figure \[steff\]a. The effect of switching from the OR of the two selections to the high $\deltm$ selection by itself can be seen at $\deltm$ = 11 $\gev$. The background to the low $\deltm$ selection is dominated by $\ggqq$ and has a total expectation of 0.8 events. For the high $\deltm$ selection, the very low expected background (0.1 events expected or ${\sim} 2 \,{\rm fb}$) is dominated by $\ww$ events.

Systematic uncertainties
------------------------

The systematic uncertainties on the $\stop$ and $\sbot$ selection efficiencies originating from the physical processes in the Monte Carlo simulation as well as those related to detector effects are evaluated following the procedure described in Reference [@ALEPH_stop]. The relative uncertainty on the selection efficiency in the case of $\stop \to \rm{c} \chi$ is 13% for low $\Delta m$ and 6% for high $\Delta m$; in the case of $\stop \to \rm{b} \ell \snu$ it is 16% for low $\Delta m$ and 6% for high $\Delta
required to be less than 25%$\rts$ if one lepton is identified and less than 20%$\rts$ if more than one lepton is identified. Additionally, the cut on the lead lepton isolation is reinforce: the energy in a $ 30^{\circ}$ cone around the direction of the electron or muon momentum must be smaller than 2.7 time the electron or muon energy. 

 # # # Selection efficiency and backdrop { # selection-efficiency-and-background-2.unnumbered } 

 The combination of the two survival is chosen harmonize to the $ \bar{N}_{95}$ procedure. For $ \deltm$ $ < $ 11   $ \gev$, the logical operating room of the two selections is used: the gamey $ \deltm$ survival helps to recover efficiency while leaving the background level unaltered. For $ \deltm$ $ \geq$ 11   $ \gev$, only the high $ \deltm$ selection is use. This is in contrast to the situation for the 130–172 GeV datum; because the background was abject for both the low and the high $ \deltm$ selections, the OR of the two selections was optimum for all $ \deltm$. 

 The $ \stop \to \rm{b } \ell \snu$ selection efficiencies are given in Figure   \[steff\]a. The effect of switching from the OR of the two survival to the gamey $ \deltm$ selection by itself can be seen at $ \deltm$ = 11   $ \gev$. The background to the low $ \deltm$ selection is dominated by $ \ggqq$ and has a total anticipation of 0.8   events. For the high $ \deltm$ excerpt, the very depleted expected background (0.1 events ask or $ { \sim } 2 \,{\rm fb}$) is predominate by $ \ww$ events. 

 Systematic uncertainties 
 ------------------------ 

 The taxonomic uncertainties on the $ \stop$ and $ \sbot$ selection efficiencies originating from the physical processes in the Monte Carlo pretense as well as those related to detector effects are evaluated play along the procedure describe in Reference   [ @ALEPH_stop ]. The relative uncertainty on the selection efficiency in the case of $ \stop \to \rm{c } \chi$ is 13% for low $ \Delta m$ and 6% for eminent $ \Delta m$; in the case of $ \stop \to \rm{b } \ell \snu$ it is 16% for low $ \Delta m$ and 6% for high $ \Delta
 reeuired to be less than 25%$\rus$ if one lepton nw idenvified znd less than 20%$\rts$ if more than one lxptob is udentified. Additionallh, the cut on the oeadmng lepton isolavjon is vzinfodged: tke energy in a $30^{\clrc}$ cone armund the direcdiun of the electron or muon momentum mtst be xmwller than 2.7 tiies uhe elednrin or muon energy.

### Selection erficienby and background {#selection-efficiency-and-bacngroknd-2.unnumbered}

The clmbination if trw two selectkons is chosen accordihg to the $\bar{N}_{95}$ procedure. For $\deutm$ $<$ 11 $\yev$, the logucql LT of the two selebtions is used: the hich $\deltk$ selection hekps to recover efficiency wiile leaving the bachground lavzl unchanged. For $\deltn$ $\teq$ 11 $\ggv$, onny tfw hkgh $\dxltj$ seleftikn is used. This is in contrast to the siuuaeppn for the 130–172 FeV daea; because the background was low for botv tge low and the high $\delrm$ selections, the OR lf the twj selections was optimal for all $\deltm$.

The $\stop \to \rm{b} \xlu \sum$ rwlfction efficiencies are given in Figure \[steff\]a. Fht enfect of switchikg from the OR of yhf yro selections to thz hjgh $\deltm$ selectioj by itfelf xan be setn at $\deltm$ = 11 $\gev$. The background ro the low $\dvltm$ selection is domiuated by $\ggqd$ anc has a total expectation of 0.8 evehts. For the high $\delfo$ selection, the xerj lof expectta background (0.1 evegts expecved ox ${\sim} 2 \,{\ro fb}$) is doiinated by $\ww$ eyants.

Systematic uncfrtaiuties
------------------------

Dhe systemwtic uncertainties on the $\stop$ eid $\sbot$ selecjiot exficiencnes orlginating from ehe physical ptocesses nn the Monte Carmo simunation as wqll as those sglated to detxctor effqcts are evaluagdd following tne procedlrt describee in Reference [@ALEPM_stop]. Fhe relative unetrtqinty on the sekecgiog vffmciensf in the casa of $\stul \to \fm{c} \chi$ is 13% wor kow $\Delta m$ and 6% for higg $\Delta m$; in the cssc of $\stop \to \rm{b} \qll \snu$ it is 16% for low $\Delta m$ wnd 6% hor hijh $\Delya
required to be less than 25%$\rts$ if is and less 20%$\rts$ if more Additionally, cut on the lepton isolation is the energy in a $30^{\circ}$ cone the direction of the electron or muon momentum must be smaller than 2.7 the electron or muon energy. ### Selection efficiency and background {#selection-efficiency-and-background-2.unnumbered} The combination the selections chosen to the $\bar{N}_{95}$ procedure. For $\deltm$ $<$ 11 $\gev$, the logical OR of the two selections used: the high $\deltm$ selection helps to recover while leaving the background unchanged. For $\deltm$ $\geq$ 11 only high $\deltm$ is This in contrast to situation for the 130–172 GeV data; because the background was low for both the low and the $\deltm$ selections, of the selections optimal all $\deltm$. The \rm{b} \ell \snu$ selection efficiencies are \[steff\]a. The effect of switching from the OR the two to the high $\deltm$ selection by can be seen at $\deltm$ = 11 $\gev$. background to the low $\deltm$ selection is dominated by $\ggqq$ and has a total expectation events. For the high selection, the very expected (0.1 expected ${\sim} 2 fb}$) is dominated by $\ww$ events. Systematic uncertainties ------------------------ The systematic on the $\stop$ and $\sbot$ selection efficiencies originating from the in Monte Carlo simulation well as those related detector are evaluated following the in [@ALEPH_stop]. on selection in the case of \to \rm{c} \chi$ is 13% low $\Delta m$ and in the case of $\stop \to \rm{b} \ell it is 16% for low $\Delta m$ 6% for high $\Delta
 required to be less than 25%$\rts$ if One lepton iS idenTifIed AnD lesS thaN 20%$\rts$ if more than ONe lePton is identified. AdditiOnallY, tHE cut ON tHe leaDing lepTOn ISOlaTiOn Is rEiNFoRced: tHe eNergy in A $30^{\circ}$ cone aRouNd The direction OF tHe electron Or mUon momentum mUst Be smalLeR thAN 2.7 timeS thE elecTron or MUon eneRgy.

### SelectIoN EfficiENcy and bACKgRounD {#selection-efficieNCy-ANd-background-2.unNumberEd}

tHe COMbiNatIon of the twO sElectIOns is chOSeN ACCorDIng to the $\bar{N}_{95}$ pRocedure. For $\DEltM$ $<$ 11 $\gev$, thE lOgiCAl OR of The twO sELecTions is used: The hIgh $\deltm$ sElectiON helps tO Recover EfficiEncY whIle lEAvInG thE bACkgROuNd lEVel UnchangeD. FOr $\Deltm$ $\Geq$ 11 $\gEV$, ONLy thE hiGh $\deLtm$ seLection is used. thiS is iN ConTrast To the SituAtIon foR the 130–172 Gev data; BeCause the backgroUnd wAs low for bOth ThE loW aNd the HIgh $\delTm$ sEleCtions, tHe OR of tHE twO sELECtIons was optimal for aLl $\DELtM$.

The $\stop \To \rm{b} \eLL \sNu$ SElection EfFicIencIES are gIven IN FIgure \[steFf\]a. The EFfEcT of switChIng froM tHe Or of The twO SeleCtions To the higH $\deltM$ Selection by itsELf can be seen at $\DElTM$ = 11 $\GeV$. the bAckGround to the Low $\dELtm$ sElecTIoN is DOminaTed by $\GgQQ$ aND has a total expectatiOn Of 0.8 evenTs. For The high $\deltm$ sElection, thE VERy low expEcteD BaCKground (0.1 events eXpectEd or ${\sim} 2 \,{\rm fB}$) Is dominaTed by $\Ww$ events.

systematiC UNcertainTieS
------------------------

ThE sySteMATiC uncertaintieS ON the $\StOp$ and $\sbOt$ sElectioN efFicIenCieS oRiginatinG from the PhYsIcAl ProCesseS In the MonTe carLo SimUlatiON as welL as thOse rElAtED to DetectoR EfFECts aRe EvAluaTed FoLlowiNg thE ProCedure dEscribed iN ReFErenCe [@aLePH_stop]. the relative unCeRtainty on tHe SelEction EFFiciency In the case of $\stop \to \rm{c} \chi$ IS 13% for low $\delTa m$ anD 6% for High $\Delta M$; in The casE of $\STop \to \rM{b} \ell \sNu$ it iS 16% fOr lOW $\delta M$ ANd 6% For HiGh $\Delta
 required to be less than25%$\rts$if on e l ept on  isiden tified and les s  tha n 20%$\rts$ if more th an on el epto n  i s ide ntified .  A d d iti on al ly,  t h ecut o n t he lead ing lepton  is ol ation is rei n fo rced: theene rgy in a $30 ^{\ circ}$  c one aroun d t he di rectio n  of th e electro no r muon momentu m mu st b e smaller than 2. 7  t i mes the electr on ormu o ne n erg y.
### Selec ti on ef f iciency an d b ack g round {#selec tion-effici e ncy -and-b ac kgr o und-2. unnum be r ed} 

The combi nati on of the  two s e lection s  is cho sen ac cor din g to th e$\b ar { N}_ { 95 }$p roc edure. F or  $ \delt m$ $ < $ 1 1 $\ gev $, t he lo gical OR of t hetwos ele ction s isused :the h igh $\ deltm $selection helps  torecover e ffi ci enc ywhile leavin g t hebackgro und lev e l u nc h a n ge d. For $\deltm$ $\ ge q $  1 1 $\gev$ , only th eh igh $\de lt m$sele c t ion i s us e d.  This is  in co n tr as t to th esituat io n f orthe 1 3 0–17 2 GeVdata; be cause the background was low for b o th t he lowand  the high $ \del t m$ s elec t io ns, the O R ofth e  t w o selections was op ti mal fo r all  $\deltm$.

T he $\stop\ t o  \rm{b}\ell \s n u$ selection e ffici encies are given in  Figu re \[ste ff\]a. Th e effect o f s wit chi ngf r om  the OR of th e twose lection s t o the h igh  $\ del tm$  s electionby itsel fca nbe  se en at $\deltm$  =  11  $ \ge v$. T h e back groun d to  t he low  $\delt m $s e lect io nis d omi na ted b y $\ g gqq $ and h as a tota l e x pect at io n of 0. 8 events. For  t he high $\ de ltm $ sele c t ion, the  very low expected back g round ( 0.1  even ts e xpected o r $ {\sim}  2\ ,{\rmfb}$)is do mi nat e d  by $ \ w w$  ev en ts.

Syste m a tic  unce rt aint ies
--- ------------------ - --
The systemat icunce r t ai nti e so n t he $\s t o p$ and $\sbot$selectionef f ic iencies or i gin at ing fro m the p hysic a l proce sses in t he MonteCa rlos i mul ation as w ell as t hose rela t ed to de tecto r e ffects  a reevalu ated f o llo wingthe pr oc eduredescr ib ed in Re ference [@ALEPH_stop].The re lativ e u ncertaint y o n  th e selecti on e fficiencyinthe  case  of $\sto p \t o  \ rm{ c } \ch i$ i s  13% forl ow  $\ D e lt a m$ and 6% f o r h igh $ \De l ta m$;  inthe case of $\sto p  \to \rm{b} \e ll \ s n u$iti s 16 %for low $\Delt a m $a n d 6% for  h igh $\Delta 
 required_to be_less than 25%$\rts$ if_one lepton_is_identified and_less_than 20%$\rts$ if_more than one_lepton is identified. Additionally,_the cut on_the_leading lepton isolation is reinforced: the energy in a $30^{\circ}$ cone around the direction_of_the electron_or_muon_momentum must be smaller than_2.7 times the electron or_muon energy.

###_Selection efficiency and background {#selection-efficiency-and-background-2.unnumbered}

The combination of the_two_selections is chosen_according to the $\bar{N}_{95}$ procedure. For $\deltm$ $<$ 11 $\gev$,_the logical OR of the two_selections is used:_the_high_$\deltm$ selection helps to_recover efficiency while leaving the background_level unchanged. For $\deltm$ $\geq$ 11 $\gev$,_only the high $\deltm$ selection is used._This is in contrast to the_situation for the 130–172 GeV_data; because_the background was low for_both the low_and the_high $\deltm$ selections,_the OR of the two selections_was optimal for_all $\deltm$.

The $\stop \to \rm{b} \ell_\snu$_selection efficiencies are_given_in_Figure \[steff\]a. The_effect of switching_from_the OR_of_the two selections to the high_$\deltm$_selection by itself can be seen at_$\deltm$ = 11 $\gev$. The_background_to the low $\deltm$_selection is dominated by $\ggqq$_and has a total expectation of_0.8 events. For_the high_$\deltm$ selection, the very low expected background (0.1 events expected or_${\sim} 2 \,{\rm fb}$) is dominated_by $\ww$ events.

Systematic uncertainties
------------------------

The_systematic uncertainties_on_the $\stop$ and_$\sbot$_selection efficiencies_originating from the physical processes in the_Monte Carlo_simulation as well as those related_to detector effects are_evaluated_following the procedure described in Reference [@ALEPH_stop]._The relative uncertainty on the selection_efficiency in the case of_$\stop_\to_\rm{c} \chi$ is 13% for_low $\Delta m$ and 6% for_high $\Delta m$;_in the case of $\stop \to \rm{b}_\ell_\snu$ it is 16% for low_$\Delta_m$ and 6% for high $\Delta