 power-law $\Theta(k)$, the scalar variance diverges in the limit $\kappa\to0$. Finally, the present results are discussed in the light of existing literature$^{8,13,17,20}$ on the exponential decay behavior at large times, when the exponential decay rate becomes independent of $\kappa$ and remains non-zero.

Basic estimates
===============

This section briefly recalls a basic calculus inequality and related estimates, both being used in this study. In what follows, $\theta$ is bounded and assumed to be sufficiently smooth so that the quantities under consideration are well defined.

The Fourier representation of $\theta(\x,t)$ is $$\begin{aligned}
\label{fourier}
\theta(\x) = \sum_{\k}\widehat{\theta}(\k)\exp\{i\k\cdot\x\},\end{aligned}$$ where $\widehat{\theta}(\k)$ is the Fourier transform of $\theta(\x)$ and $\k$ is the wave vector. In (\[fourier\]), the time variable has been suppressed for convenience. For real $\alpha$, including negative values, the fractional derivative $(-\Delta)^{\alpha/2}$ is defined by $$\begin{aligned}
\label{fractional}
(-\Delta)^{\alpha/2}\theta(\x) = 
\sum_{\k}k^\alpha\widehat{\theta}(\k)\exp\{i\k\cdot\x\},\end{aligned}$$ where $k=|\k|$ is the wave number. For $\alpha\le1$, the following interpolation-type inequality holds $$\begin{aligned}
\label{holder}
\langle|\nabla\theta|^2\rangle 
&\le&
\langle|\Delta\theta|^2\rangle^{(1-\alpha)/(2-\alpha)} 
\langle|(-\Delta)^{\alpha/2}\theta|^2\rangle^{1/(2-\alpha)}.\end{aligned}$$ This inequality reduces to the Cauchy–Schwarz inequality and an identity for $\alpha=0$ and $\alpha=1$, respectively. For $\alpha<1$, Eq. (\[holder\]) can be proved by an elementary method,$^{24,25}$ and the proof goes as follows. One has $$\begin{aligned}
\label{holder1}
\int k^2\Theta(k)\,dk &=& 
\int(k^4\Theta(k))^{(1-\alpha)/(2-\alpha)}

power - law $ \Theta(k)$, the scalar variance diverges in the limit $ \kappa\to0$. ultimately, the present result are discussed in the light of existing literature$^{8,13,17,20}$ on the exponential decay demeanor at large times, when the exponential decay rate become independent of $ \kappa$ and remains non - zero. 

 Basic estimate 
 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 

 This section briefly recall a basic calculus inequality and related appraisal, both being used in this study. In what follows, $ \theta$ is bounded and assumed to be sufficiently smooth so that the measure under consideration are well defined. 

 The Fourier representation of $ \theta(\x, t)$ is $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 \label{fourier } 
 \theta(\x) = \sum_{\k}\widehat{\theta}(\k)\exp\{i\k\cdot\x\},\end{aligned}$$ where $ \widehat{\theta}(\k)$ is the Fourier transform of $ \theta(\x)$ and $ \k$ is the wave vector. In (\[fourier\ ]), the prison term variable has been suppressed for convenience. For real $ \alpha$, include negative values, the fractional derivative $ (-\Delta)^{\alpha/2}$ is defined by $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 \label{fractional } 
 (-\Delta)^{\alpha/2}\theta(\x) = 
 \sum_{\k}k^\alpha\widehat{\theta}(\k)\exp\{i\k\cdot\x\},\end{aligned}$$ where $ k=|\k|$ is the wave number. For $ \alpha\le1 $, the follow interpolation - type inequality holds $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 \label{holder } 
 \langle|\nabla\theta|^2\rangle 
 & \le & 
 \langle|\Delta\theta|^2\rangle^{(1-\alpha)/(2-\alpha) } 
 \langle|(-\Delta)^{\alpha/2}\theta|^2\rangle^{1/(2-\alpha)}.\end{aligned}$$ This inequality reduces to the Cauchy – Schwarz inequality and an identity for $ \alpha=0 $ and $ \alpha=1 $, respectively. For $ \alpha<1 $, Eq. (\[holder\ ]) can be proved by an elementary method,$^{24,25}$ and the validation go as follows. One has $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 \label{holder1 } 
 \int k^2\Theta(k)\,dk & = & 
 \int(k^4\Theta(k))^{(1-\alpha)/(2-\alpha) }
 poaer-law $\Theta(k)$, the scalar variance diveryws in vhe limjt $\kappa\go0$. Finally, the present resulvs aee diwcussed in the light ow existinh literarure$^{8,13,17,20}$ in the exponential decay nehavnoc at large timex, when the exponential dacxy rate becomes independent of $\kappa$ wnd remsijs non-zero.

Basis esuimwtes
===============

Fhis section briefly recalls a basjc calcllus inequality amd related estimates, both heinh used in this stufy. In what dolljqs, $\theta$ is counded and assumed to be sufficiently smooth so that the auantities ubdeg consideratmon arv well defined.

The Fousier relresentation on $\theva(\x,t)$ is $$\begin{aligned}
\label{hourier}
\theta(\x) = \sum_{\k}\wydehat{\theda}(\i)\exp\{i\k\cdot\x\},\end{alitnwd}$$ whgre $\whdehxr{\thdta}(\i)$ ms fhe Fokrixr transforj of $\theta(\x)$ and $\k$ is the wave fesnpr. In (\[fouried\]), the eiie variable has been suppressed for connenisnce. For real $\alpha$, incouding negative valued, the frastional derivative $(-\Delta)^{\alpha/2}$ is defined by $$\begin{dlignxd}
\uabtl{nvactkinwl}
(-\Delta)^{\alpha/2}\theta(\x) = 
\sum_{\k}k^\alpha\widehat{\theta}(\k)\ex[\{j\k\vdpt\x\},\end{aligned}$$ chere $k=|\k|$ is the eage gumber. For $\alkha\le1$, tks rollowing interpolwtion-tyke inewuality hjlds $$\begin{aligned}
\label{holder}
\lantle|\nabla\thetc|^2\rabgle 
&\le&
\langle|\Delta\cheta|^2\rangle^{(1-\aupha)/(2-\slpha)} 
\langle|(-\Delta)^{\alpha/2}\theta|^2\rcngle^{1/(2-\ampha)}.\end{aligjed}$$ This jvequality reducer tp dhe Cauchy–Schwarz inequaliey and an ideutity fof $\alkha=0$ and $\alpha=1$, resoectiyaly. For $\alpha<1$, Eq. (\[hllder\]) cdn be provfd by an elementary method,$^{24,25}$ and vie proof goes av fmllows. Oue has $$\begin{aligned}
\jabel{holder1}
\int k^2\Theta(h)\,dk &=& 
\knt(k^4\Theta(k))^{(1-\zlpha)/(2-\al'ha)}

power-law $\Theta(k)$, the scalar variance diverges in $\kappa\to0$. the present are discussed in on exponential decay behavior large times, when exponential decay rate becomes independent of and remains non-zero. Basic estimates =============== This section briefly recalls a basic calculus and related estimates, both being used in this study. In what follows, $\theta$ bounded assumed be smooth so that the quantities under consideration are well defined. The Fourier representation of $\theta(\x,t)$ is \label{fourier} \theta(\x) = \sum_{\k}\widehat{\theta}(\k)\exp\{i\k\cdot\x\},\end{aligned}$$ where $\widehat{\theta}(\k)$ is the transform of $\theta(\x)$ and is the wave vector. In the variable has suppressed convenience. real $\alpha$, including values, the fractional derivative $(-\Delta)^{\alpha/2}$ is defined by $$\begin{aligned} \label{fractional} (-\Delta)^{\alpha/2}\theta(\x) = \sum_{\k}k^\alpha\widehat{\theta}(\k)\exp\{i\k\cdot\x\},\end{aligned}$$ where $k=|\k|$ is the number. For following interpolation-type holds \label{holder} &\le& \langle|\Delta\theta|^2\rangle^{(1-\alpha)/(2-\alpha)} \langle|(-\Delta)^{\alpha/2}\theta|^2\rangle^{1/(2-\alpha)}.\end{aligned}$$ reduces to the Cauchy–Schwarz inequality and $\alpha=0$ and $\alpha=1$, respectively. For $\alpha<1$, Eq. (\[holder\]) be proved an elementary method,$^{24,25}$ and the proof as follows. One has $$\begin{aligned} \label{holder1} \int k^2\Theta(k)\,dk \int(k^4\Theta(k))^{(1-\alpha)/(2-\alpha)}
 power-law $\Theta(k)$, the scalar vaRiance diveRges iN thE liMiT $\kapPa\to0$. finally, the presENt reSults are discussed in the Light Of EXistINg LiterAture$^{8,13,17,20}$ on THe EXPonEnTiAl dEcAY bEhaviOr aT large tImes, when thE exPoNential decay RAtE becomes inDepEndent of $\kappA$ anD remaiNs Non-ZEro.

BaSic EstimAtes
===============

ThIS sectiOn briefly ReCAlls a bASic calcULUs IneqUality and related eSTiMAtes, both being uSed in tHiS StUDY. In WhaT follows, $\thEtA$ is boUNded and ASsUMED to BE sufficiently Smooth so thaT The QuantiTiEs uNDer conSiderAtIOn aRe well definEd.

ThE Fourier rEpreseNTation oF $\Theta(\x,t)$ Is $$\begiN{alIgnEd}
\laBEl{FoUriEr}
\THetA(\X) = \sUm_{\k}\WIdeHat{\theta}(\K)\eXp\{I\k\cdoT\x\},\enD{ALIGned}$$ WheRe $\wiDehat{\Theta}(\k)$ is the FoUriEr trANsfOrm of $\Theta(\X)$ and $\K$ iS the wAve vecTor. In (\[FoUrier\]), the time varIablE has been sUppReSseD fOr conVEniencE. FoR reAl $\alpha$, IncludiNG neGaTIVE vAlues, the fractional DeRIVaTive $(-\DeltA)^{\alpha/2}$ IS dEfINed by $$\begIn{AliGned}
\LABel{frActiONaL}
(-\Delta)^{\alPha/2}\theTA(\x) = 
\SuM_{\k}k^\alphA\wIdehat{\ThEta}(\K)\exP\{i\k\cdOT\x\},\enD{alignEd}$$ where $k=|\K|$ is thE Wave number. For $\aLPha\le1$, the folloWInG INtERpolAtiOn-type inequAlitY HoldS $$\begIN{aLigNEd}
\labEl{holDeR}
\LaNGle|\nabla\theta|^2\rangle 
&\Le&
\Langle|\delta\Theta|^2\rangle^{(1-\alPha)/(2-\alpha)} 
\laNGLE|(-\Delta)^{\alPha/2}\tHEtA|^2\Rangle^{1/(2-\alpha)}.\end{AlignEd}$$ This ineqUAlity redUces tO the CaucHy–Schwarz INEquality And An iDenTitY FOr $\Alpha=0$ and $\alpha=1$, RESpecTiVely. For $\AlpHa<1$, Eq. (\[holDer\]) Can Be pRovEd By an elemeNtary metHoD,$^{24,25}$ aNd ThE prOof goES as folloWs. one HaS $$\beGin{alIGned}
\laBel{hoLder1}
\InT k^2\tHetA(k)\,dk &=& 
\int(K^4\thETA(k))^{(1-\alPhA)/(2-\aLpha)}

 power-law $\Theta(k)$, th e scalar v arian cediv er gesin t he limit $\kap p a\to 0$. Finally, the prese nt re su l ts a r ediscu ssed in th e lig ht  o f e xi s ti ng li ter ature$^ {8,13,17,2 0}$  o n the expone n ti al decay b eha vior at larg e t imes,wh ent he ex pon entia l deca y  ratebecomes i nd e penden t  of $\k a p pa $ an d remains non-zer o .Basic estimate s
==== == = == = = === =
This secti on  brie f ly reca l ls a bas i c calculus in equality an d  re latedes tim a tes, b oth b ei n g u sed in this  stu dy. In wh at fol l ows, $\ t heta$ i s boun ded  an d as s um ed  to  b e  su f fi cie n tly  smoothso  t hat t he q u a n t itie s u nder  cons ideration are  we ll d e fin ed.
The F ouri er  repr esenta tionof  $\theta(\x,t)$  is$$\begin{ ali gn ed} 
\ label { fourie r}\th eta(\x)  = \sum _ {\k }\ w i d eh at{\theta}(\k)\exp \{ i \ k\ cdot\x\} ,\end{ a li gn e d}$$ whe re  $\ wide h a t{\th eta} ( \k )$ is th e Four i er  t ransfor mof $\t he ta( \x) $ and $\k$  is th e wave v ector .  In (\[fourier \ ]), the timev ar i a bl e  has  be en suppress ed f o r co nven i en ce. For r eal $ \a l ph a $, including negati ve  value s, th e fractionalderivative $ ( -\Delta) ^{\a l ph a /2}$ is define d by$$\begin{a l igned}
\ label {fractio nal}
(-\D e l ta)^{\al pha /2} \th eta ( \ x)  = 
\sum_{\k} k ^ \alp ha \wideha t{\ theta}( \k) \ex p\{ i\k \c dot\x\},\ end{alig ne d} $$  w her e $k= | \k|$ isth e w av e n umber .  For $ \alph a\le 1$ ,t hefollowi n gi n terp ol at ion- typ einequ alit y  ho lds $$\ begin{ali gne d }
\l ab el {holder }
\langle|\na bl a\theta|^2 \r ang le 
&\ l e &
\langl e|\Delta\theta|^2\rangl e ^{(1-\a lph a)/(2 -\al pha)} 
\l ang le|(-\ Del t a)^{\a lpha/2 }\the ta |^2 \ r angle ^ { 1/ (2- \a lpha)}.\en d { ali gned} $$  Thi s inequ ality reduces to t h e C auchy–Schwarz  in equa l i ty  an d  a n  id en t ity f or $\alpha=0$ a nd $\alpha =1 $ ,respective l y.Fo r $\alp ha<1$,Eq. ( \ [holder \]) can b e provedby  ane l eme ntary meth od,$^{24 ,25}$ and the p r oo f goe s a s foll ow s.One h as $$\ b egi n{ali gned}\l abel{h older 1} 
\int k^ 2\Theta(k)\,dk &=& 
\in t(k^4\ Theta (k) )^{(1-\al pha ) /(2 -\alpha)} 

 power-law_$\Theta(k)$, the_scalar variance diverges in_the limit_$\kappa\to0$._Finally, the_present_results are discussed_in the light_of existing literature$^{8,13,17,20}$ on_the exponential decay_behavior_at large times, when the exponential decay rate becomes independent of $\kappa$ and remains_non-zero.

Basic_estimates
===============

This section_briefly_recalls_a basic calculus inequality and_related estimates, both being used_in this_study. In what follows, $\theta$ is bounded and_assumed_to be sufficiently_smooth so that the quantities under consideration are well_defined.

The Fourier representation of $\theta(\x,t)$ is_$$\begin{aligned}
\label{fourier}
\theta(\x) = \sum_{\k}\widehat{\theta}(\k)\exp\{i\k\cdot\x\},\end{aligned}$$_where_$\widehat{\theta}(\k)$_is the Fourier transform_of $\theta(\x)$ and $\k$ is the_wave vector. In (\[fourier\]), the time_variable has been suppressed for convenience. For_real $\alpha$, including negative values, the_fractional derivative $(-\Delta)^{\alpha/2}$ is defined_by $$\begin{aligned}
\label{fractional}
(-\Delta)^{\alpha/2}\theta(\x)_= 
\sum_{\k}k^\alpha\widehat{\theta}(\k)\exp\{i\k\cdot\x\},\end{aligned}$$ where $k=|\k|$ is_the wave number._For $\alpha\le1$,_the following interpolation-type_inequality holds $$\begin{aligned}
\label{holder}
\langle|\nabla\theta|^2\rangle 
&\le&
\langle|\Delta\theta|^2\rangle^{(1-\alpha)/(2-\alpha)} 
\langle|(-\Delta)^{\alpha/2}\theta|^2\rangle^{1/(2-\alpha)}.\end{aligned}$$ This_inequality reduces to_the Cauchy–Schwarz inequality and an identity_for_$\alpha=0$ and $\alpha=1$,_respectively._For_$\alpha<1$, Eq._(\[holder\]) can be_proved_by an_elementary_method,$^{24,25}$ and the proof goes as_follows._One has $$\begin{aligned}
\label{holder1}
\int k^2\Theta(k)\,dk &=& 
\int(k^4\Theta(k))^{(1-\alpha)/(2-\alpha)}
