 over the set of initial conditions to find $\lambda$. If this asymptotic value is positive, the system is defined as chaotic. To put a stricter criterion on the degree of chaos, we choose a threshold value of the exponent $\lambda_c$ beyond which the system is in the regime of hard chaos. We set $\lambda_c$ arbitrarily to the value 1, but as a check we generated Poincaré phase portraits to confirm chaos by looking for featureless ([*i.e.,*]{} no invariant tori) phase portraits. In this way, by varying the parameters $(\epsilon,{\tilde\omega_c})$ in a continuous fashion over the whole plane, running the map repeatedly and obtaining the resulting $\lambda$’s, we obtained the ‘phase diagram’ for this system, including a distinct ‘phase boundary’ separating the quasi-integrable and hard chaos regions. Of course, this phase boundary depends on the precise value of the cutoff $\lambda_c$ we choose. Nevertheless, we checked that on varying the cutoff $\lambda_c$, the phase boundary shifts only slightly and furthermore, the shape of the boundary remains qualitatively the same. Indeed, to a high degree of precision, the phase boundary can be fitted by $$\label{eq:eq18}
{\tilde\omega_c} = C(\lambda_c)/\epsilon,$$ where $C(\lambda_c)$ is a constant which depends on the value of the cutoff. Figure 1 shows the phase diagram for a cutoff $\lambda_c=1$.

We observe from the classical Poincaré sections that there is a symmetry line in the $(r,p_r)$ plane. This arises from the time-reversal invariance present in the problem as follows. Consider a particle kicked at $\tau=0$. The position $r_0$ remains unchanged, while the momentum changes : $p_r^{(+)} = p_r^{(-)} + \eta\ r_0$. Denoting $p_r^{+}$ by $p_0$, then at time $0^{(-)}$ the particle had momentum $p_r^{(-)} = p_0 -\eta\ 
r_0$. Taking into account the fact that the angular momentum is conserved, we see that propagating a particle [*forward*]{} in time from $(r_0,p_0)$ is the same as propagating it [*backward*]{} from $(r_0,\eta\ r_0-p_0)$. Thus, the motion is symmetric about the line $p_
over the set of initial conditions to find $ \lambda$. If this asymptotic value is positive, the arrangement is define as chaotic. To put a stricter criterion on the academic degree of chaos, we choose a threshold value of the exponent $ \lambda_c$ beyond which the system is in the government of hard chaos. We set $ \lambda_c$ randomly to the value 1, but as a confirmation we generated Poincaré phase portrait to confirm chaos by looking for featureless ([ * i.e., * ] { } no invariant torus) phase portrayal. In this way, by varying the parameters $ (\epsilon,{\tilde\omega_c})$ in a continuous fashion over the whole airplane, running the map repeatedly and obtaining the leave $ \lambda$ ’s, we obtained the ‘ phase diagram ’ for this system, include a distinct ‘ phase boundary ’ separate the quasi - integrable and hard chaos regions. Of course, this phase boundary depends on the accurate value of the cutoff $ \lambda_c$ we choose. Nevertheless, we checked that on varying the cutoff $ \lambda_c$, the phase boundary shift only slightly and furthermore, the shape of the boundary remains qualitatively the same. Indeed, to a high degree of precision, the phase boundary can be match by $ $ \label{eq: eq18 } 
 { \tilde\omega_c } = C(\lambda_c)/\epsilon,$$ where $ C(\lambda_c)$ is a constant which depends on the value of the cutoff. name 1 show the phase diagram for a cutoff $ \lambda_c=1$. 

 We observe from the authoritative Poincaré sections that there constitute a symmetry line in the $ (radius, p_r)$ plane. This arises from the time - reversal invariance present in the problem as succeed. Consider a particle kicked at $ \tau=0$. The position $ r_0 $ remain unchanged, while the momentum change: $ p_r^{(+) } = p_r^{(-) } + \eta\ r_0$. announce $ p_r^{+}$ by $ p_0 $, then at time $ 0^{(-)}$ the particle had momentum $ p_r^{(-) } = p_0 -\eta\ 
 r_0$. Taking into report the fact that the angular momentum is conserved, we see that propagating a particle [ * forward * ] { } in time from $ (r_0,p_0)$ is the same as propagating it [ * backward * ] { } from $ (r_0,\eta\ r_0 - p_0)$. Thus, the movement is symmetric about the line $ phosphorus _
 ovfr the set of initial cokditions to find $\lambda$. If thjs asympgotic value is positive, the dywtem us defined as chaotic. Go put a dtricter criuerion on the degcse of cmcos, ws chomwe a threshold value of dhe exponent $\ldmcdc_c$ beyond which the system is in the regime ov hard chaos. Wg set $\jambsa_c$ arbitrarily to the value 1, but zs a chtck we generated Ppincaré phase portraits to fonflrm chaos by lookijg for featodelqws ([*i.e.,*]{} no invxriant torp) phase porjraits. In this way, by varying thd parcmeters $(\epsulin,{\tlnde\omega_c})$ ii a cogtinuous fasmpon oves the wnole plane, runking vhe nap repeatedly and obvaining the resultind $\lambda$’s, wz obtained the ‘phase eiqgram’ for thir syrtej, mncmuding a vistinct ‘phzse boundart’ separating the qussy-pmtegrable ans hard craos regions. Of course, this phase bounddry depends on the precise value of the cutoff $\pambda_c$ wq choose. Nevertheless, we checked that on varying dhe cntuff $\lwovdw_c$, the phase boundary shifts only slightly anq firnhermore, the shapc of the boundary telaogs qualitativgly the saje. Indeed, to a higj degreg of peecision, uhe pnase boundary can be fitted by $$\label{eq:ez18}
{\rilde\omega_c} = C(\lambba_c)/\epsilon,$$ wkere $C(\kambds_c)$ is a constant which bependa on the vapue of ths cutoff. Figure 1 rhoes the phase diagram for a cttoff $\lamuda_c=1$.

Wz observd frpm the classical Poingdré sections that tjere ns a vymmetry llne in the $(r,p_r)$ plane. This arises from the timg-reeerval invaxiance present in tre problem as yollows. Eonsiddr a partible kickev at $\tau=0$. The position $r_0$ ralains unchanjed, while the momwntum cfxnges : $p_r^{(+)} = p_r^{(-)} + \eta\ r_0$. Deujtint $p_r^{+}$ by $p_0$, then at bime $0^{(-)}$ fhe particle hab nomentum $p_r^{(-)} = p_0 -\rta\ 
r_0$. Eaniig inem account tha fazt gnat tfe angular numenyum is conserved, we vee fhat propagating a pwrticle [*dorward*]{} yn time from $(t_0,p_0)$ is the same as kropageting mt [*baclwatd*]{} from $(r_0,\eta\ r_0-p_0)$. Thus, the motion is symmehrig about the lyne $i_
over the set of initial conditions to If asymptotic value positive, the system put stricter criterion on degree of chaos, choose a threshold value of the $\lambda_c$ beyond which the system is in the regime of hard chaos. We $\lambda_c$ arbitrarily to the value 1, but as a check we generated Poincaré portraits confirm by for featureless ([*i.e.,*]{} no invariant tori) phase portraits. In this way, by varying the parameters $(\epsilon,{\tilde\omega_c})$ a continuous fashion over the whole plane, running map repeatedly and obtaining resulting $\lambda$’s, we obtained the diagram’ this system, a ‘phase separating the quasi-integrable hard chaos regions. Of course, this phase boundary depends on the precise value of the cutoff $\lambda_c$ choose. Nevertheless, that on the $\lambda_c$, phase boundary shifts and furthermore, the shape of the the same. Indeed, to a high degree of the phase can be fitted by $$\label{eq:eq18} {\tilde\omega_c} C(\lambda_c)/\epsilon,$$ where $C(\lambda_c)$ is a constant which depends the value of the cutoff. Figure 1 shows the phase diagram for a cutoff $\lambda_c=1$. from the classical Poincaré that there is symmetry in $(r,p_r)$ This arises the time-reversal invariance present in the problem as follows. Consider a kicked at $\tau=0$. The position $r_0$ remains unchanged, while the : = p_r^{(-)} + r_0$. Denoting $p_r^{+}$ by then time $0^{(-)}$ the particle $p_r^{(-)} p_0 into the that the angular momentum conserved, we see that propagating particle [*forward*]{} in time as propagating it [*backward*]{} from $(r_0,\eta\ r_0-p_0)$. Thus, motion is symmetric about the line $p_
 over the set of initial conditIons to find $\LambdA$. If ThiS aSympTotiC value is positiVE, the System is defined as chaotIc. To pUt A StriCTeR critErion on THe DEGreE oF cHaoS, wE ChOose a ThrEshold vAlue of the eXpoNeNt $\lambda_c$ beyONd Which the sySteM is in the regiMe oF hard cHaOs. WE Set $\laMbdA_c$ arbItrariLY to the Value 1, but aS a CHeck we GEnerateD pOiNcarÉ phase portraits to COnFIrm chaos by lookIng for FeATuRELesS ([*i.e.,*]{} No invarianT tOri) phASe portrAItS. iN ThiS Way, by varying tHe parameterS $(\EpsIlon,{\tiLdE\omEGa_c})$ in a ContiNuOUs fAshion over tHe whOle plane, rUnning THe map rePEatedly And obtAinIng The rESuLtIng $\LaMBda$’S, We ObtAIneD the ‘phasE dIaGram’ fOr thIS SYStem, IncLudiNg a diStinct ‘phase boUndAry’ sEParAting The quAsi-iNtEgrabLe and hArd chAoS regions. Of coursE, thiS phase bouNdaRy DepEnDs on tHE preciSe vAluE of the cUtoff $\laMBda_C$ wE CHOoSe. Nevertheless, we chEcKED tHat on varYing thE CuToFF $\lambda_c$, ThE phAse bOUNdary ShifTS oNly slighTly and FUrThErmore, tHe Shape oF tHe bOunDary rEMainS qualiTatively The saME. Indeed, to a high DEgree of precisIOn, THE pHAse bOunDary can be fiTted BY $$\labEl{eq:EQ18}
{\tIldE\Omega_C} = C(\lamBdA_C)/\ePSilon,$$ where $C(\lambda_c)$ iS a ConstaNt whiCh depends on thE value of thE CUToff. FiguRe 1 shOWs THe phase diagram For a cUtoff $\lambdA_C=1$.

We obserVe froM the clasSical PoinCARé sectioNs tHat TheRe iS A SyMmetry line in tHE $(R,p_r)$ pLaNe. This aRisEs from tHe tIme-RevErsAl InvariancE present In ThE pRoBleM as foLLows. ConsIdEr a PaRtiCle kiCKed at $\tAu=0$. The PosiTiOn $R_0$ RemAins uncHAnGED, whiLe ThE momEntUm ChangEs : $p_r^{(+)} = P_R^{(-)} + \etA\ r_0$. DenotIng $p_r^{+}$ by $p_0$, tHen AT timE $0^{(-)}$ tHe ParticlE had momentum $p_R^{(-)} = p_0 -\Eta\ 
r_0$. Taking InTo aCcount THE fact thaT the angular momentum is coNServed, wE seE that PropAgating a pArtIcle [*foRwaRD*]{} in timE from $(r_0,P_0)$ is thE sAme AS PropaGATiNg iT [*bAckward*]{} froM $(R_0,\Eta\ R_0-p_0)$. ThuS, tHe moTion is sYmmetric about the liNE $p_
 over the set of initial c onditionsto fi nd$\l am bda$ . If  this asymptot i c va lue is positive, the s ystem  i s  def i ne d aschaotic .  T o put  a  s tri ct e rcrite rio n on th e degree o f c ha os, we choos e  a  threshold  va lue of the e xpo nent $ \l amb d a_c$bey ond w hich t h e syst em is inth e  regim e  of har d ch aos.  We set $\lambda_ c $a rbitrarily tothe va lu e  1 , but  as  a check w egener a ted Poi n ca r é pha s e portraits t o confirm c h aos  by lo ok ing for fe ature le s s ( [*i.e.,*]{}  noinvariant  tori) phase p o rtraits . In t his  wa y, b y  v ar yin gt hep ar ame t ers  $(\epsi lo n, {\til de\o m e g a _c}) $ i n aconti nuous fashion  ov er t h e w holeplane , ru nn ing t he map  repe at edly and obtain ingthe resul tin g$\l am bda$’ s , we o bta ine d the ‘ phase d i agr am ’ f or  this system, incl ud i n ga distin ct ‘ph a se  b o undary’se par atin g the q uasi - in tegrable  and h a rd  c haos re gi ons. O fcou rse , thi s  pha se bou ndary de pends on the precise value of thec ut o f f$ \lam bda _c$ we choo se.N ever thel e ss , w e  chec ked t ha t  o n  varying the cutoff  $ \lambd a_c$,  the phase bo undary shi f t s  only sl ight l ya nd furthermore , the  shape oft he bound ary r emains q ualitativ e l y the sa me.  In dee d,t o  a  high degreeo f  pre ci sion, t hephase b oun dar y c anbe  fitted b y $$\lab el {e q: eq 18} 
{\ti l de\omega _c } =  C (\l ambda _ c)/\ep silon ,$$wh er e  $C (\lambd a _c ) $  isaco nsta ntwh ich d epen d s o n the v alue of t hec utof f.  F igure 1  shows the ph as e diagramfo r a  cutof f $\lambda _c=1$.

We observe from the cla ssi cal P oinc aré secti ons  thatthe r e is a  symme try l in e i n the $ ( r ,p _r) $plane. Thi s ari ses f ro m th e time- reversal invarianc e  pr esent in thepro blem a sfol l ow s . C on s ide r a particle kick ed at $\ta u= 0 $.  The posit i on$r _0$ rem ains un chang e d, whil e the mom entum cha ng es : $ p_r ^{(+)} = p _r^{(-)}  + \eta\r _0$.D en oting  $p _r^{+} $by$p_0$ , then attime$0^{(- )} $ theparti cl e had mo mentum $p_r^{(-)} = p_0  -\eta \ 
r_ 0$.  Taking i nto acc ount thefact  that theang ula r mom ent u m iscons e rv ed, we se e th a t propaga t in g a p ar ticle [*for w a r d*] {} in  ti m e from  $(r _0,p_0)$ is the s a me as propagat ingi t  [* bac k ward *] {} from $(r_0, \et a\ r _0-p_0)$ .Thus, the m otion is  s y mmetr ic abo ut the  line $ p _ 
 over_the set_of initial conditions to_find $\lambda$._If_this asymptotic_value_is positive, the_system is defined_as chaotic. To put_a stricter criterion_on_the degree of chaos, we choose a threshold value of the exponent $\lambda_c$ beyond_which_the system_is_in_the regime of hard chaos._We set $\lambda_c$ arbitrarily to_the value_1, but as a check we generated Poincaré_phase_portraits to confirm_chaos by looking for featureless ([*i.e.,*]{} no invariant tori)_phase portraits. In this way, by_varying the parameters_$(\epsilon,{\tilde\omega_c})$_in_a continuous fashion over_the whole plane, running the map_repeatedly and obtaining the resulting $\lambda$’s,_we obtained the ‘phase diagram’ for this_system, including a distinct ‘phase boundary’_separating the quasi-integrable and hard_chaos regions._Of course, this phase boundary_depends on the_precise value_of the cutoff_$\lambda_c$ we choose. Nevertheless, we checked_that on varying_the cutoff $\lambda_c$, the phase boundary_shifts_only slightly and_furthermore,_the_shape of_the boundary remains_qualitatively_the same._Indeed,_to a high degree of precision,_the_phase boundary can be fitted by $$\label{eq:eq18}
{\tilde\omega_c}_= C(\lambda_c)/\epsilon,$$ where $C(\lambda_c)$_is_a constant which depends_on the value of the_cutoff. Figure 1 shows the phase_diagram for_a cutoff_$\lambda_c=1$.

We observe from the classical Poincaré sections that there is a_symmetry line in the $(r,p_r)$ plane._This arises from the_time-reversal invariance_present_in the problem_as_follows. Consider_a particle kicked at $\tau=0$. The position_$r_0$ remains_unchanged, while the momentum changes :_$p_r^{(+)} = p_r^{(-)} +_\eta\_r_0$. Denoting $p_r^{+}$ by $p_0$, then_at time $0^{(-)}$ the particle had_momentum $p_r^{(-)} = p_0 -\eta\_
r_0$._Taking_into account the fact that_the angular momentum is conserved, we_see that propagating_a particle [*forward*]{} in time from $(r_0,p_0)$_is_the same as propagating it [*backward*]{}_from_$(r_0,\eta\ r_0-p_0)$. Thus, the motion is_symmetric_about_the line $p_