mid r$ by Chinese remainder theorem, and hence $$\label{eq:varrp}
\varrho_r(p)=\begin{cases}
\varrho(p) & \text{ if } p\nmid r;\\
1 &\text{ if } p\mid r.
\end{cases}$$ This implies $\varrho_r(p)=1+O(p^{-\frac{1}{2}})$ uniformly for any $p\gg 1$ and any $r\in{{\mathbb {N}}}_{\neq 0}$, so by Mertens’ first theorem on arithmetic progressions (c.f. [@Iwaniec-Kolwalski Theorem 2.2]), the hypothesis is verified for the arithmetic function $\varrho_r$ and the set ${{\mathcal {P}}}_{Q_2}^\prime$ uniformly for any $r$ (that is, the remainder term $K$ in depends only on the polynomial $Q_1$ and is independent of $r$).

Next we need to evaluate for each $d\in{{\mathbb {N}}}_{\neq 0}$ square-free, the cardinality of the subsequence ${{\mathcal {A}}}(T)_{rd}$, using and the definition of $\omega_r,\varrho_r$. $$\begin{aligned}
    \#{{\mathcal {A}}}(T)_{rd}&=\frac{\omega(dr)}{(dr)^M}T^M+O(\omega(dr)T^{M-1})\\ &=\frac{\omega_r(d)}{d^M}\frac{\omega(r)}{r^{M}}T^{M}+O((dr)^{M-1+\varepsilon}T^{M-1})\\ &=\frac{\varrho_r(d)}{d}X_r+O((dr)^{M-1+\varepsilon}T^{M-1}).\end{aligned}$$ Define $$R_r(d):=\#{{\mathcal {A}}}(T)_{rd}-\frac{\varrho_r(d)}{d}X_r.$$ The above computation shows that $$R_r(d)=O((dr)^{M-1+\varepsilon}T^{M-1}).$$ On applying Theorem \[thm:I-F\] with $z=T^\lambda,y=T^\beta$, for $\lambda,\beta>0$ small enough, we get, for each $r$ square-full with all prime divisors in ${{\mathcal {P}}}_{Q_2}$,

$$\begin
mid r$ by Chinese remainder theorem, and hence $ $ \label{eq: varrp } 
 \varrho_r(p)=\begin{cases } 
 \varrho(p) & \text { if } p\nmid r;\\ 
 1 & \text { if } p\mid r. 
 \end{cases}$$ This implies $ \varrho_r(p)=1+O(p^{-\frac{1}{2}})$ uniformly for any $ p\gg 1 $ and any $ r\in{{\mathbb { N}}}_{\neq 0}$, therefore by Mertens ’ inaugural theorem on arithmetic progressions (c.f. [ @Iwaniec - Kolwalski Theorem 2.2 ]), the hypothesis is control for the arithmetic function $ \varrho_r$ and the laid $ { { \mathcal { P}}}_{Q_2}^\prime$ uniformly for any $ r$ (that is, the end term $ K$ in depends only on the polynomial $ Q_1 $ and is independent of $ r$). 

 Next we need to measure for each $ d\in{{\mathbb { N}}}_{\neq 0}$ square - free, the cardinality of the subsequence $ { { \mathcal { A}}}(T)_{rd}$, using and the definition of $ \omega_r,\varrho_r$. $ $ \begin{aligned } 
     \#{{\mathcal { A}}}(T)_{rd}&=\frac{\omega(dr)}{(dr)^M}T^M+O(\omega(dr)T^{M-1})\\ & = \frac{\omega_r(d)}{d^M}\frac{\omega(r)}{r^{M}}T^{M}+O((dr)^{M-1+\varepsilon}T^{M-1})\\ & = \frac{\varrho_r(d)}{d}X_r+O((dr)^{M-1+\varepsilon}T^{M-1}).\end{aligned}$$ specify $ $ R_r(d):=\#{{\mathcal { A}}}(T)_{rd}-\frac{\varrho_r(d)}{d}X_r.$$ The above computation shows that $ $ R_r(d)=O((dr)^{M-1+\varepsilon}T^{M-1}).$$ On applying Theorem \[thm: I - F\ ] with $ z = T^\lambda, y = T^\beta$, for $ \lambda,\beta>0 $ small enough, we get, for each $ r$ square - entire with all prime divisors in $ { { \mathcal { P}}}_{Q_2}$, 

 $ $ \begin
mid r$ by Chinese remainder uheorem, and hence $$\label{ex:varrp}
\barrho_r(p)=\cegin{cases}
\varrho(p) & \text{ if } '\nmie r;\\
1 &\ttqt{ if } p\mid r.
\end{cases}$$ This imppies $\vareho_r(k)=1+O(p^{-\frac{1}{2}})$ uniformly for any $p\gg 1$ zkd anv $c\in{{\mathbb {N}}}_{\neq 0}$, so by Merdens’ first themrdm on arithmetic progressions (c.f. [@Iwanyec-Kolwsldki Theorem 2.2]), tre hjpjtheaps is verified for the arithmetjc funcuion $\varrho_r$ and tne set ${{\mathcal {P}}}_{Q_2}^\prime$ univormpy for any $r$ (that ls, the remaundew term $K$ in ddpends onlj on the pomynomial $Q_1$ and is independent ow $r$).

Nert we need jo egdluate for xach $d\pn{{\mathbb {N}}}_{\neq 0}$ square-xree, thr cardinality pf vhe wubsequence ${{\mathcal {A}}}(V)_{rd}$, using and the desinition mf $\omega_r,\varrho_r$. $$\betib{aligted}
    \#{{\mxrhcxl {Z}}}(T)_{cd}&=\fdac{\omeha(dc)}{(dr)^M}T^M+O(\omegz(dr)T^{M-1})\\ &=\frac{\onega_r(d)}{d^M}\frac{\omega(r)}{r^{K}}T^{I}+I((dr)^{M-1+\varepsiloh}T^{M-1})\\ &=\frwc{\darrho_r(d)}{d}X_r+O((dr)^{M-1+\varepsilon}T^{M-1}).\end{aligned}$$ Dtfine $$R_r(d):=\#{{\mathcal {A}}}(T)_{rd}-\frac{\vareho_r(d)}{d}X_r.$$ The above colputation shows that $$R_r(d)=O((dr)^{M-1+\varepsilon}T^{M-1}).$$ On applying Theoram \[thj:K-F\] clbh $z=G^\oalbda,y=T^\beta$, for $\lambda,\beta>0$ small enough, we get, rot vach $r$ square-full with all ptile qivisors in ${{\mxthcal {P}}}_{Q_2}$,

$$\gegin
mid r$ by Chinese remainder theorem, and \varrho_r(p)=\begin{cases} & \text{ } p\nmid r;\\ r. This implies $\varrho_r(p)=1+O(p^{-\frac{1}{2}})$ for any $p\gg and any $r\in{{\mathbb {N}}}_{\neq 0}$, so Mertens’ first theorem on arithmetic progressions (c.f. [@Iwaniec-Kolwalski Theorem 2.2]), the hypothesis is for the arithmetic function $\varrho_r$ and the set ${{\mathcal {P}}}_{Q_2}^\prime$ uniformly for any (that the term in depends only on the polynomial $Q_1$ and is independent of $r$). Next we need to for each $d\in{{\mathbb {N}}}_{\neq 0}$ square-free, the cardinality the subsequence ${{\mathcal {A}}}(T)_{rd}$, and the definition of $\omega_r,\varrho_r$. \#{{\mathcal &=\frac{\omega_r(d)}{d^M}\frac{\omega(r)}{r^{M}}T^{M}+O((dr)^{M-1+\varepsilon}T^{M-1})\\ &=\frac{\varrho_r(d)}{d}X_r+O((dr)^{M-1+\varepsilon}T^{M-1}).\end{aligned}$$ $$R_r(d):=\#{{\mathcal The computation shows that On applying Theorem \[thm:I-F\] with $z=T^\lambda,y=T^\beta$, for $\lambda,\beta>0$ small enough, we get, for each $r$ square-full with prime divisors {P}}}_{Q_2}$, $$\begin
mid r$ by Chinese remainder theOrem, and henCe $$\labEl{eQ:vaRrP}
\varRho_r(P)=\begin{cases}
\varRHo(p) & \tExt{ if } p\nmid r;\\
1 &\text{ if } p\mid r.
\End{caSeS}$$ this IMpLies $\vArrho_r(p)=1+o(P^{-\fRAC{1}{2}})$ unIfOrMly FoR AnY $p\gg 1$ aNd aNy $r\in{{\maThbb {N}}}_{\neq 0}$, so By MErTens’ first theOReM on arithmeTic Progressions (C.f. [@IWaniec-koLwaLSki ThEorEm 2.2]), the HypothESis is vErified foR tHE arithMEtic funCTIoN $\varRho_r$ and the set ${{\mathCAl {p}}}_{q_2}^\prime$ uniformlY for anY $r$ (THaT IS, thE reMainder terM $K$ In depENds only ON tHE POlyNOmial $Q_1$ and is inDependent of $R$).

nexT we neeD tO evALuate fOr eacH $d\IN{{\maThbb {N}}}_{\neq 0}$ squAre-fRee, the carDinaliTY of the sUBsequenCe ${{\mathCal {a}}}(T)_{rD}$, usiNG aNd The DeFIniTIoN of $\OMegA_r,\varrho_R$. $$\bEgIn{aliGned}
    \#{{\MATHCal {A}}}(t)_{rd}&=\Frac{\Omega(Dr)}{(dr)^M}T^M+O(\omega(Dr)T^{m-1})\\ &=\fraC{\OmeGa_r(d)}{d^m}\frac{\OmegA(r)}{R^{M}}T^{M}+O((Dr)^{M-1+\varEpsilOn}t^{M-1})\\ &=\frac{\varrho_r(d)}{d}x_r+O((dR)^{M-1+\varepsiLon}t^{M-1}).\End{AlIgned}$$ dEfine $$R_R(d):=\#{{\mAthCal {A}}}(T)_{rd}-\Frac{\varRHo_r(D)}{d}x_R.$$ tHe Above computation shOwS THaT $$R_r(d)=O((dr)^{M-1+\VarepsILoN}T^{m-1}).$$ on applyiNg theOrem \[THM:I-F\] wiTh $z=T^\LAmBda,y=T^\betA$, for $\laMBdA,\bEta>0$ smalL eNough, wE gEt, fOr eAch $r$ sQUare-Full wiTh all priMe divISors in ${{\mathcal {P}}}_{q_2}$,

$$\Begin
mid r$ by Chinese remainde r theorem,  andhen ce$$ \lab el{e q:varrp}
\varr h o_r( p)=\begin{cases}
\varr ho(p)  & \tex t {if }p\nmidr ;\ \ 1 & \t ex t{if }p\mid  r. 
\end{c ases}$$ Th isim plies $\varr h o_ r(p)=1+O(p ^{- \frac{1}{2}} )$unifor ml y f o r any  $p \gg 1 $ anda ny $r\ in{{\math bb {N}}}_ { \neq 0} $ ,  s o by  Mertens’ first t h eo r em on arithmet ic pro gr e ss i o ns(c. f. [@Iwani ec -Kolw a lski Th e or e m 2.2 ] ), the hypoth esis is ver i fie d forth e a r ithmet ic fu nc t ion  $\varrho_r $ an d the set  ${{\m a thcal { P }}}_{Q_ 2}^\pr ime $ u nifo r ml yfor  a n y $ r $(th a t i s, the r em ai nderterm $ K $  indep ends  only  on the polyn omi al $ Q _1$  andis in depe nd ent o f $r$) .

Ne xt  we need to eva luat e for eac h $ d\ in{ {\ mathb b  {N}}} _{\ neq  0}$ sq uare-fr e e,th e c ar dinality of the su bs e q ue nce ${{\ mathca l  { A} } }(T)_{rd }$ , u sing a nd th e de f in ition of  $\ome g a_ r, \varrho _r $. $$\ be gin {al igned } 
   \#{{\ mathcal{A}}} ( T)_{rd}&=\frac { \omega(dr)}{( d r) ^ M }T ^ M+O( \om ega(dr)T^{M -1}) \ \ &= \fra c {\ ome g a_r(d )}{d^ M} \ fr a c{\omega(r)}{r^{M}} T^ {M}+O( (dr)^ {M-1+\varepsi lon}T^{M-1 } ) \ \ &=\fra c{\v a rr h o_r(d)}{d}X_r+ O((dr )^{M-1+\va r epsilon} T^{M- 1}).\end {aligned} $ $  Define$$R _r( d): =\# { { \m athcal {A}}}( T ) _{rd }- \frac{\ var rho_r(d )}{ d}X _r. $$Th e above c omputati on  s ho ws  th at $$ R _r(d)=O( (d r)^ {M -1+ \vare p silon} T^{M- 1}). $$  O n  ap plyingT he o r em \ [t hm :I-F \]wi th $z =T^\ l amb da,y=T^ \beta$, f or$ \lam bd a, \beta>0 $ small enoug h,  we get, f or  ea ch $r$ s quare-fu ll with all prime divis o rs in $ {{\ mathc al { P}}}_{Q_2 }$, 

$$\b egi n 
mid r$_by Chinese_remainder theorem, and hence_$$\label{eq:varrp}
\varrho_r(p)=\begin{cases}
\varrho(p) &_\text{_if }_p\nmid_r;\\
1 &\text{ if_} p\mid r.
\end{cases}$$_This implies $\varrho_r(p)=1+O(p^{-\frac{1}{2}})$ uniformly_for any $p\gg_1$_and any $r\in{{\mathbb {N}}}_{\neq 0}$, so by Mertens’ first theorem on arithmetic progressions (c.f._[@Iwaniec-Kolwalski_Theorem 2.2]),_the_hypothesis_is verified for the arithmetic_function $\varrho_r$ and the set_${{\mathcal {P}}}_{Q_2}^\prime$_uniformly for any $r$ (that is, the remainder_term_$K$ in depends_only on the polynomial $Q_1$ and is independent of_$r$).

Next we need to evaluate for_each $d\in{{\mathbb {N}}}_{\neq_0}$_square-free,_the cardinality of the_subsequence ${{\mathcal {A}}}(T)_{rd}$, using and the_definition of $\omega_r,\varrho_r$. $$\begin{aligned}
  _ \#{{\mathcal {A}}}(T)_{rd}&=\frac{\omega(dr)}{(dr)^M}T^M+O(\omega(dr)T^{M-1})\\ &=\frac{\omega_r(d)}{d^M}\frac{\omega(r)}{r^{M}}T^{M}+O((dr)^{M-1+\varepsilon}T^{M-1})\\ &=\frac{\varrho_r(d)}{d}X_r+O((dr)^{M-1+\varepsilon}T^{M-1}).\end{aligned}$$ Define $$R_r(d):=\#{{\mathcal_{A}}}(T)_{rd}-\frac{\varrho_r(d)}{d}X_r.$$ The above computation shows that_$$R_r(d)=O((dr)^{M-1+\varepsilon}T^{M-1}).$$ On applying Theorem \[thm:I-F\]_with $z=T^\lambda,y=T^\beta$,_for $\lambda,\beta>0$ small enough, we_get, for each_$r$ square-full_with all prime_divisors in ${{\mathcal {P}}}_{Q_2}$,

$$\begin