 observed
  7    708         Gettysburg 0.4m   $R$                            50 bad observing conditions
  8    713         Jena 0.6m         $R_\textrm{B}$                 50 only first half of transit observed
  9    807         Antalya 1.0m      $R$                             3 technical problems
  10   821         Tenerife 1.2m     $r_\textrm{S}$                 10 bad weather during egress phase
  11   833         Jena 0.25m        $R_\textrm{B}$                100 bad weather, gaps in the data
  12   834         Jena 0.25m        $R_\textrm{B}$                100 only first half of transit observed
  13   834         OSN 1.5m          $R_\textrm{C}$                 20 upcoming bad weather during ingress
  14   840         Tenerife 1.2m     $r_\textrm{S}$                 10 large fit errors
  15   848         Tenerife 1.2m     $r_\textrm{S}$                 15 only egress phase observed
  16   854         Tenerife 1.2m     $r_\textrm{S}$                 20 only ingress phase observed
  17   855         Tenerife 1.2m     $r_\textrm{S}$                 20 jumps in data, no good fits possible
  18   861         Tenerife 1.2m     $r_\textrm{S}$                 25 bad observing conditions
  19   867         Tenerife 1.2m     $r_\textrm{S}$                 25 bad observing conditions
  20   906         Torun 0.6m        $clear$                        10 only ingress phase observed
  21   1001        Torun 0.6m        $clear$                         6 jumps in data, no good fits possible

Analysis {#sec:Analysis}
========

All light curves (except for the Ankara 0.4m observation) are extracted from the reduced images using the same aperture photometry routines (described in section \[sec:GettingTheLightcurve\]) in order to prevent systematic offsets between different transit observations due to different light curve extraction methods. Afterwards we model the data sets using the *JKTEBOP* algorithm [@JKTEBOP], as well as the Transit Analysing Package *TAP* [@T
observed 
   7     708          Gettysburg 0.4 m    $ R$                             50 bad observing condition 
   8     713          Jena 0.6 thousand          $ R_\textrm{B}$                  50 only first half of transportation system observed 
   9     807          Antalya 1.0 m       $ R$                              3 technical problem 
   10    821          Tenerife 1.2 m      $ r_\textrm{S}$                  10 bad weather during emergence phase 
   11    833          Jena 0.25 thousand         $ R_\textrm{B}$                 100 bad weather, col in the data 
   12    834          Jena 0.25 m         $ R_\textrm{B}$                 100 entirely inaugural half of transit observed 
   13    834          OSN 1.5 m           $ R_\textrm{C}$                  20 upcoming regretful weather during ingress 
   14    840          Tenerife 1.2 m      $ r_\textrm{S}$                  10 large fit erroneousness 
   15    848          Tenerife 1.2 m      $ r_\textrm{S}$                  15 only emergence phase observed 
   16    854          Tenerife 1.2 meter      $ r_\textrm{S}$                  20 only ingress phase observed 
   17    855          Tenerife 1.2 m      $ r_\textrm{S}$                  20 jumps in data, no effective fits possible 
   18    861          Tenerife 1.2 m      $ r_\textrm{S}$                  25 bad observing conditions 
   19    867          Tenerife 1.2 m      $ r_\textrm{S}$                  25 bad observing conditions 
   20    906          Torun 0.6 m         $ clear$                         10 only ingress phase observed 
   21    1001         Torun 0.6 m         $ clear$                          6 jumps in data, no good match possible 

 Analysis { # sec: Analysis } 
 = = = = = = = = 

 All faint curve (except for the Ankara 0.4 m observation) are extracted from the reduced images using the same aperture photometry routine (described in section   \[sec: GettingTheLightcurve\ ]) in order to prevent systematic offsets between different transportation system observations due to different light curve origin methods. subsequently we model the data sets using the * JKTEBOP * algorithm [ @JKTEBOP ], as well as the Transit Analysing Package * TAP * [ @T
 obderved
  7    708         Getuysburg 0.4m   $R$                            50 bad observing conditions
  8    713         Jena 0.6m         $R_\textrm{B}$                 50 only hjrst half of fvansic ibserved
  9    807         Attalya 1.0m      $S$                             3 technicaj problrmd
  10   821         Tentrise 1.2m     $r_\textrm{S}$                 10 bad weatheg during egress pnase
  11   833         Jena 0.25m        $R_\textrm{B}$                100 bae wewrher, gaps in the data
  12   834         Jena 0.25m        $R_\textrm{B}$                100 only furwt jdlf of tranwit ofserved
  13   834         OSN 1.5m          $R_\textvm{C}$                 20 upcoming bad weather durind ingress
  14   840         Tenerufw 1.2m     $r_\dextfn{S}$                 10 large fit errors
  15   848         Tenerife 1.2k     $r_\textrm{S}$                 15 only egress phase observed
  16   854         Tenerife 1.2m     $r_\twxtrm{S}$                 20 only iggress phase observed
  17   855         Tenerife 1.2m     $r_\texvro{S}$                 20 jumps in data, no good fits possiblq
  18   861         Tenevife 1.2m     $r_\textrm{X}$                 25 bad oyaedving conditions
  19   867         Renerife 1.2i     $r_\textrm{S}$                 25 bad observiug xonditions
  20   906         Torun 0.6m        $clear$                        10 only inhress phaad observed
  21   1001        Torun 0.6m        $clear$                         6 jukps in data, no glod flds possible

Analysid {#sec:Cnalyvis}
========

All ligjt curves (except for the Ankara 0.4m observation) ase vxtracted from the reduced ymages using tke same cpertufe photomenry routiies (describeq in section \[saf:GettingTheLmghtcurve\]) in irdee to prdxent systemativ offsets between dufferent transit onservxfions due to diyyetwnt light curvr ebtrwcnioi metrmds. Afterwargs wd mucel tfe data setw usimg the *JKTEBOP* algorhthm [@JKTEBOP], as well ax bhe Transut Analyfing Package *YAP* [@T
observed 7 708 Gettysburg 0.4m $R$ 50 conditions 713 Jena $R_\textrm{B}$ 50 only 9 Antalya 1.0m $R$ technical problems 10 Tenerife 1.2m $r_\textrm{S}$ 10 bad weather egress phase 11 833 Jena 0.25m $R_\textrm{B}$ 100 bad weather, gaps in the 12 834 Jena 0.25m $R_\textrm{B}$ 100 only first half of transit observed 13 OSN $R_\textrm{C}$ upcoming weather during ingress 14 840 Tenerife 1.2m $r_\textrm{S}$ 10 large fit errors 15 848 Tenerife 1.2m 15 only egress phase observed 16 854 Tenerife $r_\textrm{S}$ 20 only ingress observed 17 855 Tenerife 1.2m 20 in data, good possible 861 Tenerife 1.2m 25 bad observing conditions 19 867 Tenerife 1.2m $r_\textrm{S}$ 25 bad observing conditions 20 906 Torun 0.6m 10 only observed 21 Torun $clear$ jumps in data, fits possible Analysis {#sec:Analysis} ======== All for the Ankara 0.4m observation) are extracted from reduced images the same aperture photometry routines (described section \[sec:GettingTheLightcurve\]) in order to prevent systematic offsets different transit observations due to different light curve extraction methods. Afterwards we model the data the *JKTEBOP* algorithm [@JKTEBOP], well as the Analysing *TAP*
 observed
  7    708         Gettysburg 0.4m   $R$                            50 bad obServing conDitioNs
  8    713         JEna 0.6M         $R_\TextRm{B}$                 50 oNly first half of TRansIt observed
  9    807         Antalya 1.0m      $R$                             3 tecHnicaL pRObleMS
  10   821         TEneriFe 1.2m     $r_\texTRm{s}$                 10 BAd wEaThEr dUrINg EgresS phAse
  11   833         Jena 0.25M        $R_\textrm{B}$                100 bAd wEaTher, gaps in thE DaTa
  12   834         Jena 0.25m        $R_\teXtrM{B}$                100 only first hAlf Of tranSiT obSErved
  13   834         oSN 1.5M          $R_\texTrm{C}$                 20 upCOming bAd weather DuRIng ingREss
  14   840         TeneRIFe 1.2M     $r_\teXtrm{S}$                 10 large fit erroRS
  15   848         TENerife 1.2m     $r_\textrm{s}$                 15 only eGrESs PHAse ObsErved
  16   854         TenerIfE 1.2m     $r_\teXTrm{S}$                 20 onlY InGRESs pHAse observed
  17   855         TeNerife 1.2m     $r_\texTRm{S}$                 20 Jumps iN dAta, NO good fIts poSsIBle
  18   861         tenerife 1.2m     $r_\tExtrM{S}$                 25 bad obseRving cONditionS
  19   867         tenerifE 1.2m     $r_\texTrm{s}$                 25 baD obsERvInG coNdITioNS
  20   906         TOruN 0.6M        $clEar$                        10 only iNgReSs phaSe obSERVEd
  21   1001        ToRun 0.6M        $cleAr$                         6 jumPs in data, no gooD fiTs poSSibLe

AnaLysis {#Sec:ANaLysis}
========

all ligHt curVeS (except for the AnKara 0.4M observatIon) ArE exTrActed FRom the RedUceD images Using thE SamE aPERTuRe photometry routinEs (DEScRibed in sEction \[SEc:geTTingTheLIgHtcUrve\]) IN Order To prEVeNt systemAtic ofFSeTs Between DiFferenT tRanSit ObserVAtioNs due tO differeNt ligHT curve extractiON methods. AfterWArDS We MOdel The Data sets usiNg thE *jKTEbOP* aLGoRitHM [@JKTEbOP], as WeLL aS The Transit Analysing paCkage *TaP* [@T
 observed
  7    708        Gettysb urg 0 .4m   $R $                       50 bad observing con ditio ns   8 713       J en a 0.6 m    $R _\tex trm {B}$              5 0 only first ha lf of tran sit  observed
 9   807     Ant aly a 1.0 m    $R$                      3 te chni cal problems
  10  8 21         Ten erife1. 2 m  $ r_\ textrm{S}$             1 0 b adw eather during  egress pha s e
 11  83 3      Jena0. 2 5m       $R_\ text rm{B}$             1 0 0 bad w eather , g aps  int he  d ata 
12 8 34      Jena  0 .2 5m     $ R _ \tex trm {B}$                10 0 o nlyf irs t hal f oftran si t obs erved  13 834         OSN  1.5 m         $ R_ \te xt rm{C} $               20  upcomi n g b ad w e at her during ingress 
1 4  840       T en er i fe 1.2m   $ r_\t e x trm{S }$             10 la rg e fit e rr ors
 15   848        T enerif e 1.2m    $r _ \textrm{S}$              1 5o n ly egre ssphase obser ved 16  85 4       Te nerif e1 .2 m      $r_\textrm{S}$               20 only i ngress pha s e observed 
  1 7  855         Te nerif e 1.2m   $r_\text rm{S} $              2 0 jumpsindat a,nog o od  fits possibl e   18   861       Tene rif e 1 .2m    $r_\textr m{S}$           25 bad obse rv ing  c ond ition s 
  19  867      Ten erife 1 . 2m    $ r_ \t extr m{S }$              25bad obser vin g  con di ti ons
  2 0   906       Torun 0.6 m      $c l e ar$                       10 o n ly ingr ess  phas e ob served
 21  1001       To run 0. 6m     $ c lear$                 6 ju mp s in  data,no good fits possi b le
Analysis {#s ec: Anal y s is }
= = == = === 
A lll i ght curves (exc ept for th eA nk ara 0.4m o b ser va tion) a re extr acted from th e reduced  images u si ng t h e  sa me apertur e photom etry rout i nes ( d es cribe d i n sect io n \ [sec: Gettin g The Light curve\ ])  in or der t opreventsystematic offsets betw een di ffere nttransit o bse r vat ions dueto d ifferent l igh t c urveext r actio n me t ho ds. After ward s  we model th e d a t asets usingt h e  *J KTEBO P*a lgorit hm [ @JKTEBOP], as wel l  as the Transi t An a l ysi ngP acka ge  *TAP* [@T
 observed
_ 7_   708_ __ __  Gettysburg_0.4m  _$R$   _  __             __ ___ 50 bad observing conditions
_ 8   _713 _       Jena_0.6m_  _     $R_\textrm{B}$   _     _  ___  50 only_first half of transit observed
 _9    807 _      _Antalya 1.0m    _ $R$   _ _    _  _ _  _     _  _ 3 technical problems
  10__ 821 ___ _  _Tenerife_1.2m __  $r_\textrm{S}$   __      _   __10 bad weather during_egress phase
  11 _ 833    _ _ _Jena 0.25m        $R_\textrm{B}$ _     _   _ __ 100 bad_weather,_gaps in_the data
  12   834_ _     _Jena 0.25m  __    $R_\textrm{B}$ _     _    ___ 100 only first half_of transit observed
  13 _ 834 _      _OSN_1.5m     __   $R_\textrm{C}$  ___    _     _ 20 upcoming bad weather during ingress
  14_  840_    ___ Tenerife 1.2m     $r_\textrm{S}$  _ _  _         10_large fit errors
  15  _848         Tenerife 1.2m_    $r_\textrm{S}$   _      _   __ 15 only egress phase observed
 _16___854  _  _  _Tenerife 1.2m_  _ $r_\textrm{S}$_  __            20 only ingress phase observed
 _17   855  _    __Tenerife 1.2m _   $r_\textrm{S}$_       _        20_jumps_in data,_no good fits possible
_ 18_ _861  _ _ _ _Tenerife 1.2m     $r_\textrm{S}$__        ____  _25 bad observing_conditions
  19_  867__     _ Tenerife 1.2m_   _$r_\textrm{S}$         _       25 bad observing conditions
  20   906 _ _   _ Torun_0.6m_     _ $clear$_       __           ___10 only ingress_phase_observed
  21   1001_____   Torun 0.6m _      $clear$__    _ __   _   _       6 jumps in data,_no_good fits_possible

Analysis_{#sec:Analysis}
========

All_light_curves (except for the_Ankara 0.4m observation) are extracted from the reduced images using the same aperture photometry routines_(described_in section \[sec:GettingTheLightcurve\]) in order to_prevent systematic offsets between different transit_observations_due to different light_curve extraction methods. Afterwards we model the data_sets using the *JKTEBOP* algorithm_[@JKTEBOP], as well as_the Transit Analysing Package *TAP* [@T