 Phys.  [**31**]{}, 725 (1990)

A. Ashtekar and A. Magnon-Ashtekar “On the symplectic structure of general relativity” Commun. Math. Phys.  [**86**]{}, 55 (1982).

R. Geroch, “Asymptotic structure of space-time,” in *Asymptotic structure of space-time*, ed. L. Witten, Plenum, New York (1976)

C.  Kozameh and E. T. Newman, “A note on asymptotically flat spaces. II.”, General Relativity and Gravitation 15.5 (1983): 475-487.

[^1]: In [@cs], this theorem was proved in the holomorphic limit. More general proofs were later given in [@plefka; @bern]. See [@gj; @naculich; @white] for earlier work on soft graviton amplitudes.

[^2]: Based on earlier papers, we refer to the subleading soft theorem as Cachazo-Strominger theorem.

[^3]: Here ‘charge’ refers to what is called ‘flux’ in the radiative phase space literature, i.e. it involves a three dimensional integral over null infinity.

[^4]: We are deviating from the standard radiative phase space terminology in which ‘frame’ denotes a conformal class of $[(q_{ab},n^a)]$ of metric *and* null normal [@as].

[^5]: This actually is not the totality of free data since there are additional $u$-independent sphere functions that arise as integration ‘constants’ [@bt]. These however play no role in our analysis.

[^6]: The analogue of the space $\Gamma^{\qo}_0$ that was used in [@us] actually allows for a $u$-independent term and hence is invariant under supertranslations. The stronger condition (\[defGqoo\]) is used here in order to allow for certain integration by parts in $u$

[^7]: For slower fall-offs of the type which define $\Gamma$ (Eqns. (\[defGq\]), (\[defGamma\])) there may be a possibility of obtaining a finite symplectic structure by supplementing the action with counterterms at $i^{0}, i^{\pm}$. We have not pursued this direction here as it is not needed for our analysis. \[countertermfn\]
Phys.    [ * * 31 * * ] { }, 725 (1990) 

 A.   Ashtekar and A.   Magnon - Ashtekar “ On the symplectic structure of general relativity ” Commun.   Math.   Phys.    [ * * 86 * * ] { }, 55 (1982). 

 R.   Geroch, “ Asymptotic structure of space - meter, ” in * Asymptotic social organization of space - time *, ed. L. Witten, Plenum, New York (1976) 

 C.    Kozameh and E.   T.   Newman, “ A bill on asymptotically compressed spaces. II. ”, General Relativity and Gravitation 15.5 (1983 ): 475 - 487. 

 [ ^1 ]: In [ @cs ], this theorem was proved in the holomorphic terminus ad quem. More general proofs were later contribute in [ @plefka; @bern ]. See [ @gj; @naculich; @white ] for earlier work on indulgent graviton amplitudes. 

 [ ^2 ]: Based on early newspaper, we refer to the subleading soft theorem as Cachazo - Strominger theorem. 

 [ ^3 ]: Here ‘ charge ’ refers to what is called ‘ magnetic field ’ in the radiative phase space literature, i.e. it involves a three dimensional integral over null eternity. 

 [ ^4 ]: We are deviating from the standard radiative phase space terminology in which ‘ skeleton ’ denotes a conformal course of $ [ (q_{ab},n^a)]$ of metric * and * null normal [ @as ]. 

 [ ^5 ]: This actually is not the sum of free data since there are extra $ u$-independent sphere functions that arise as integration ‘ constants ’ [ @bt ]. These however play no function in our analysis. 

 [ ^6 ]: The analogue of the space $ \Gamma^{\qo}_0 $ that was used in [ @us ] actually allows for a $ u$-independent term and hence is invariant under supertranslations. The stronger condition (\[defGqoo\ ]) is used here in ordering to allow for certain consolidation by part in $ u$ 

 [ ^7 ]: For dense fall - offs of the type which define $ \Gamma$ (Eqns. (\[defGq\ ]), (\[defGamma\ ]) ) there may be a possibility of obtaining a finite symplectic structure by supplementing the legal action with counterterms at $ i^{0 }, i^{\pm}$. We have not pursued this direction here as it is not needed for our analysis. \[countertermfn\ ]
 Phyd.  [**31**]{}, 725 (1990)

A. Ashtekar and A. Magnok-Ashtekar “On the symplertic stducture uf general relativity” Commun. Larh. Phyw.  [**86**]{}, 55 (1982).

R. Geroch, “Asymptotic structurv of spacw-timt,” in *Asymptotic svducture of spzge-timz*, xd. L. Witten, Plekum, New Yorn (1976)

C.  Kozameh ang D. T. Uewman, “A note on asymptotically flat spaces. IL.”, General Relajivitj wnd Fgayitation 15.5 (1983): 475-487.

[^1]: In [@cs], this theorem wzs provtd in the holomorpnic limit. More general prolfs aere later given ij [@plefka; @beth]. Sqw [@gj; @naculicf; @white] fog earlier wkrk on soft graviton amplitudes.

[^2]: Baseb on earliet laogrs, we refer to tre subleadinn soft dheorem as Cachazo-Strpmiiger theorem.

[^3]: Here ‘charge’ cefers to what is cajled ‘flux’ iu the radiative phase space nitesatufw, i.d. iu iivomves a thcee dimensiknal integrql over null infiniuy.

[^4]: Rv are deviatihg froi ehe standard radiative phase space termpnolkgy in which ‘frame’ denores a conformal class of $[(q_{ab},n^a)]$ of metric *and* null normal [@as].

[^5]: This actually is nod the gotcoity ud vree data since there are additional $u$-indepenqsnu sihere functions tmat arise as integtahipg ‘constants’ [@bj]. These hosever play no role in our analtsis.

[^6]: The wnalpgue of the space $\Gamma^{\qo}_0$ tyat was used un [@us] actually alllws for a $u$-nndepemdent term and hence is invaxiant hnder superhranslatikvs. The stronger zoncidion (\[defGqoo\]) is used here yn order vo alkow for cerjain ineegration hy pavds in $u$

[^7]: For slower fall-lfxs of the hype which define $\Gamma$ (Eqns. (\[dehJq\]), (\[defGamma\])) tnese kay be a posslbility of obtayning a finite sympleetic sgructure bj supplemxnting the astion with cogjterterms at $i^{0}, i^{\pm}$. Wq hace nit pursjdd this directoon here cf it is not needed for out znalysis. \[countexuernfn\]
Phys. [**31**]{}, 725 (1990) A. Ashtekar and “On symplectic structure general relativity” Commun. R. “Asymptotic structure of in *Asymptotic structure space-time*, ed. L. Witten, Plenum, New (1976) C. Kozameh and E. T. Newman, “A note on asymptotically flat spaces. General Relativity and Gravitation 15.5 (1983): 475-487. [^1]: In [@cs], this theorem was in holomorphic More proofs were later given in [@plefka; @bern]. See [@gj; @naculich; @white] for earlier work on soft amplitudes. [^2]: Based on earlier papers, we refer the subleading soft theorem Cachazo-Strominger theorem. [^3]: Here ‘charge’ to is called in radiative space literature, i.e. involves a three dimensional integral over null infinity. [^4]: We are deviating from the standard radiative phase terminology in denotes a class $[(q_{ab},n^a)]$ metric *and* null [^5]: This actually is not the data since there are additional $u$-independent sphere functions arise as ‘constants’ [@bt]. These however play no in our analysis. [^6]: The analogue of the $\Gamma^{\qo}_0$ that was used in [@us] actually allows for a $u$-independent term and hence is supertranslations. The stronger condition is used here order allow certain by parts $u$ [^7]: For slower fall-offs of the type which define $\Gamma$ (\[defGq\]), (\[defGamma\])) there may be a possibility of obtaining a structure supplementing the action counterterms at $i^{0}, i^{\pm}$. have pursued this direction here is needed \[countertermfn\]
 Phys.  [**31**]{}, 725 (1990)

A. Ashtekar and A. Magnon-AsHtekar “On thE sympLecTic StRuctUre oF general relatiVIty” COmmun. Math. Phys.  [**86**]{}, 55 (1982).

R. Geroch, “AsYmptoTiC StruCTuRe of sPace-timE,” In *aSYmpToTiC stRuCTuRe of sPacE-time*, ed. l. Witten, PleNum, neW York (1976)

C.  KozameH AnD E. T. Newman, “A NotE on asymptotiCalLy flat SpAceS. iI.”, GenEraL RelaTivity ANd GravItation 15.5 (1983): 475-487.

[^1]: In [@Cs], THis theORem was pROVeD in tHe holomorphic limiT. moRE general proofs Were laTeR GiVEN in [@PleFka; @bern]. See [@Gj; @NaculICh; @white] FOr EARLieR Work on soft graViton amplitUDes.

[^2]: based oN eArlIEr papeRs, we rEfER to The subleadiNg soFt theorem As CachAZo-StromINger theOrem.

[^3]: HeRe ‘cHarGe’ reFErS tO whAt IS caLLeD ‘flUX’ in The radiaTiVe Phase SpacE LITEratUre, I.e. it InvolVes a three dimeNsiOnal INteGral oVer nuLl inFiNity.

[^4]: WE are deViatiNg From the standard RadiAtive phasE spAcE teRmInoloGY in whiCh ‘fRamE’ denoteS a confoRMal ClASS Of $[(Q_{ab},n^a)]$ of metric *and* nuLl NORmAl [@as].

[^5]: This ActualLY iS nOT the totaLiTy oF freE DAta siNce tHErE are addiTional $U$-InDePendent SpHere fuNcTioNs tHat arISe as IntegrAtion ‘conStantS’ [@Bt]. These however PLay no role in ouR AnALYsIS.

[^6]: The AnaLogue of the sPace $\gAmma^{\Qo}_0$ thAT wAs uSEd in [@uS] actuAlLY aLLows for a $u$-independenT tErm and Hence Is invariant unDer supertrANSLations. THe stROnGEr condition (\[defgqoo\]) iS used here iN Order to aLlow fOr certaiN integratION by parts In $u$

[^7]: for SloWer FALl-Offs of the type WHIch dEfIne $\GammA$ (EqNs. (\[defGq\]), (\[DefgamMa\])) tHerE mAy be a possIbility oF oBtAiNiNg a FinitE SymplectIc StrUcTurE by suPPlemenTing tHe acTiOn WIth CounterTErMS At $i^{0}, i^{\Pm}$. we Have Not PuRsued This DIreCtion heRe as it is nOt nEEded FoR oUr analySis. \[counterterMfN\]
 Phys.  [**31**]{}, 725 (1 990)

A. A shtek arand  A . Ma gnon -Ashtekar “Ont he s ymplectic structure of  gene ra l  rel a ti vity”  Commun .  M a t h.Ph ys . [* * 86 **]{} , 5 5 (1982 ).

R. Ger och ,“Asymptotics tr ucture ofspa ce-time,” in  *A sympto ti c s t ructu reof sp ace-ti m e*, ed . L. Witt en ,  Plenu m , New Y o r k(197 6)

C.  Kozameh a n dE . T. Newman, “ A note  o n  a s y mpt oti cally flat  s paces .  II.”,G en e r a l R e lativity andGravitation 15. 5 (198 3) : 4 7 5-487. 

[^1 ]: In[@cs], this  the orem wasproved in theh olomorp hic li mit . M oreg en er alpr o ofs we rel ate r givenin  [ @plef ka;@ b e r n].See  [@g j; @n aculich; @whi te]  for ear lierworkon s of t gra vitonampli tu des.

[^2]: Bas ed o n earlier  pa pe rs,  w e ref e r to t hesub leading  soft t h eor em a s  C achazo-Stromingerth e o re m.

[^3] : Here ‘c ha r ge’ refe rs  to  wha t is ca lled ‘f lux’ inthe ra d ia ti ve phas espaceli ter atu re, i . e. i t invo lves a t hreed imensional int e gral over nul l  i n f in i ty.
[^ 4]: We aredevi a ting  fro m  t hes tanda rd ra di a ti v e phase space termi no logy i n whi ch ‘frame’ de notes a co n f o rmal cla ss o f  $ [ (q_{ab},n^a)]$  of m etric *and *  null no rmal[@as].
[^5]: Thi s actually  is  no t t het o ta lity of freed a ta s in ce ther e a re addi tio nal  $u $-i nd ependentsphere f un ct io ns  th at ar i se as in te gra ti on‘cons t ants’[@bt] . Th es eh owe ver pla y  n o role  i nourana ly sis.
[^6 ] : T he anal ogue of t hes pace  $ \G amma^{\ qo}_0$ that w as  used in [ @u s]actual l y  allowsfor a $u$-independent t e rm andhen ce is  inv ariant un der  super tra n slatio ns. Th e str on ger c ondit i o n(\[ de fGqoo\]) i s use d her ein o rder to  allow for certain int egration by p art s in $ u$ 

[ ^ 7] :  Fo rs low e r  fall-offs of t he type wh ic h  d efine $\Ga m ma$  ( Eqns. ( \[defGq \]),( \[defGa mma\])) t here maybe  a p o s sib ility of o btaining  a finite sympl e ct ic st ruc ture b ysup pleme ntingt heactio n with  c ounter terms  a t $i^{0} , i^{\pm}$. We have not  pursu ed th isdirection  he r e a s it is n ot n eeded forour  an alysi s.\ [coun tert e rm fn\ ] 
 Phys.  [**31**]{},_725 (1990)

A. Ashtekar_and A. Magnon-Ashtekar “On the_symplectic structure_of_general relativity”_Commun. Math. Phys. _[**86**]{}, 55 (1982).

R. Geroch,_“Asymptotic structure of_space-time,” in *Asymptotic structure_of space-time*, ed._L._Witten, Plenum, New York (1976)

C.  Kozameh and E. T. Newman, “A note on asymptotically flat spaces._II.”,_General Relativity_and_Gravitation_15.5 (1983): 475-487.

[^1]: In [@cs],_this theorem was proved in_the holomorphic_limit. More general proofs were later given in_[@plefka;_@bern]. See [@gj;_@naculich; @white] for earlier work on soft graviton amplitudes.

[^2]:_Based on earlier papers, we refer_to the subleading_soft_theorem_as Cachazo-Strominger theorem.

[^3]: Here_‘charge’ refers to what is called_‘flux’ in the radiative phase space_literature, i.e. it involves a three dimensional_integral over null infinity.

[^4]: We are_deviating from the standard radiative_phase space_terminology in which ‘frame’ denotes_a conformal class_of $[(q_{ab},n^a)]$_of metric *and*_null normal [@as].

[^5]: This actually is_not the totality_of free data since there are_additional_$u$-independent sphere functions_that_arise_as integration_‘constants’ [@bt]. These_however_play no_role_in our analysis.

[^6]: The analogue of_the_space $\Gamma^{\qo}_0$ that was used in [@us]_actually allows for a_$u$-independent_term and hence is_invariant under supertranslations. The stronger_condition (\[defGqoo\]) is used here in_order to_allow for_certain integration by parts in $u$

[^7]: For slower fall-offs of the_type which define $\Gamma$ (Eqns. (\[defGq\]),_(\[defGamma\])) there may be_a possibility_of_obtaining a finite_symplectic_structure by_supplementing the action with counterterms at $i^{0},_i^{\pm}$. We_have not pursued this direction here_as it is not_needed_for our analysis. \[countertermfn\]