solid lines), second (dashed) and third (dotted) peaks in the polarization spectrum, as a function of $\alpha$ at decoupling and $\tau$. A (somewhat idealized) description of how $\alpha$ and $\tau$ can be measured using CMB polarization. ](figure3.eps){width="3.5in"}

The outstanding effect of reionization is to introduce a bump in the polarization spectrum at large angular scales (lower left panel). This bump is produced well after decoupling (at much lower redshifts), when $\alpha$, if varying, is much closer to the present day’s value. If the value of $\alpha$ at low redshift is different from that at decoupling, the peaks in the polarization power spectrum at small angular scales will be shifted sideways, while the reionization bump on large angular scales won’t (lower right panel). It follows that by measuring the separation between the normal peaks and the bump, one can measure both $\alpha$ and $\tau$, as illustrated in Fig. \[figpeaks\]. Thus we expect that the existence of an early reionization epoch will, when more accurate cosmic microwave background polarization data is available, lead to considerably tighter constraints on $\alpha$.

A possible concern with the interpretation of our results is related to the implicit assumption of a sharp transition on the value of $\alpha$ happening sometime between recombination and the epoch of reionization. Hence, it is crucial to understand if this is a valid approximation. Appart from the value of $\alpha$ at the time of recombination the knowledge of its value at two other epochs is relevant as far as the CMB anisotropies are concerned. One such epoch is the period *just before* recombination which is very important for the damping of CMB anisotropies on small angular scales. The other period is the epoch of reionization. In this work we effectively assume that $\alpha$ is equal to $\alpha_{rec}$ before recombination and to $\alpha_0$ at the reionization epoch.

A value of $\alpha$ different from $\alpha_0$ at the epoch of reionization will affect the CMB anisotropies through a change in the optical depth $\tau$, *once a single cosmological model is assumed*. However, it is also well known that $\tau$ is itself dependent on the cosmological model through its cosmological parameters ($\Omega_m$ and $\Omega_\Lambda$ for example) as well as on the cosmological density perturbations (in our case through the initial power spectrum) [@pedrol
solid lines), second (dashed) and third (dotted) acme in the polarization spectrum, as a affair of $ \alpha$ at decoupling and $ \tau$. A (somewhat idealized) description of how $ \alpha$ and $ \tau$ can be quantify using CMB polarization. ] (figure3.eps){width="3.5 in " } 

 The outstanding impression of reionization is to precede a bump in the polarization spectrum at bombastic angular scales (lower left control panel). This bump is produced well after decouple (at a lot lower redshifts), when $ \alpha$, if vary, is much closer to the present sidereal day ’s value. If the value of $ \alpha$ at low redshift is different from that at decouple, the peaks in the polarization power spectrum at little angular scales will be switch sideways, while the reionization bump on large angular scales wo n’t (lower correct panel). It follows that by measuring the separation between the normal peaks and the bulge, one can measure both $ \alpha$ and $ \tau$, as illustrated in Fig. \[figpeaks\ ]. Thus we expect that the existence of an early reionization epoch will, when more accurate cosmic microwave background polarization data is available, lead to considerably tighter constraint on $ \alpha$. 

 A possible concern with the rendition of our result is relate to the implicit assumption of a sharp transition on the value of $ \alpha$ happening sometime between recombination and the epoch of reionization. Hence, it is crucial to sympathize if this is a valid approximation. Appart from the value of $ \alpha$ at the time of recombination the knowledge of its value at two other epochs is relevant as far as the CMB anisotropies are concerned. One such epoch is the period * just before * recombination which is very important for the damping of CMB anisotropy on small angular scale. The early period is the epoch of reionization. In this work we effectively assume that $ \alpha$ is equal to $ \alpha_{rec}$ before recombination and to $ \alpha_0 $ at the reionization epoch. 

 A value of $ \alpha$ different from $ \alpha_0 $ at the epoch of reionization will affect the CMB anisotropies through a variety in the optical astuteness $ \tau$, * once a single cosmological model is assumed *. However, it is also well know that $ \tau$ is itself dependent on the cosmologic model through its cosmologic parameters ($ \Omega_m$ and $ \Omega_\Lambda$ for model) as well as on the cosmologic density perturbations (in our case through the initial power spectrum) [ @pedrol
solld lines), second (dashed) akd third (dotted) keqks in the pklarizatkon spectrum, as a function oh $\alpha$ au decoupling and $\taj$. A (somewjat ideaoizev) description of how $\alpmc$ and $\bau$ ccn be measured uxing CMB pmlarization. ](ficufe3.zps){width="3.5in"}

The outstanding effect of weionizstlon is to intrjduct a buml in the polarization spectrum at marge aigular scales (lpwer left panel). This bump ls pgoduced well after decoupling (at iych lower reashifts), whtn $\alpha$, if barying, is much closer to the pfesenc day’s valug. Jf jhe value of $\alphw$ at low redshift is differrnt from that st vecoypling, the peaks in tie polarization powet spectrum ac small angular scalew qill te sviftde skdesabs, shile hhe reionizatjon bump on large angular scalts rin’t (lower riggt panql). It follows that by measuring the separdtikn between the normal pwaks and the bump, one can meastre both $\alpha$ and $\tau$, as illustrated in Fig. \[figpaaks\]. Vhjs cc dzpfct that the existence of an early reionizatijh tpobh will, when more accurate cpsliv microwave bazkgrouus lolarization data ls avaijable, lead to sonsoderably tighter constraintw on $\alpha$.

A iossuble concern with che interprecation of oir results is related tu ths implicit wssumptioh of a sharp tranritpon mn the value of $\alpha$ happqning somxtime betweev revombinwtion and hhe eimch of reionizatioj. Henee, it is cruciap to understand if this is a valid approximatoot. Aipart froi the value of $\alpra$ at the time of recjmbinxtion the inowledje of its vajue at two otvgr epochs is celevant ws fqr aw the COC anisotropies are concvrued. One sych epoch is the pcriod *nust before* recimbunation which ix vdry ilpprednt for the gampkng pf CMC anisouxoples on xmall angular scales. The other period is tne epoch od reionisation. In thix work we effectivtly asvumx that $\alkha$ is equal to $\alpha_{rec}$ before recombinwtijn and to $\al[ha_0$ qt the reionnzation epoch.

A value of $\alpha$ different hrom $\alpha_0$ at the epoch of reionization wikk affect thx CMB wnisotrophes through a change in the optical dtpth $\tau$, *once a single dosmolmgicap model is assumed*. However, it is also well known that $\tau$ is itself depeneent oi ehe cosmoloficak modvl chrpugh ies clrmological paramvters ($\Omega_m$ and $\Omega_\Lambda$ for example) af well as on the cosmologicak aensity pertutbations (in our case throufh the imitial power spectrum) [@pedrol
solid lines), second (dashed) and third (dotted) the spectrum, as function of $\alpha$ (somewhat description of how and $\tau$ can measured using CMB polarization. ](figure3.eps){width="3.5in"} The effect of reionization is to introduce a bump in the polarization spectrum at angular scales (lower left panel). This bump is produced well after decoupling (at lower when if is much closer to the present day’s value. If the value of $\alpha$ at low redshift different from that at decoupling, the peaks in polarization power spectrum at angular scales will be shifted while reionization bump large scales (lower right panel). follows that by measuring the separation between the normal peaks and the bump, one can measure both and $\tau$, in Fig. Thus expect the existence of reionization epoch will, when more accurate polarization data is available, lead to considerably tighter on $\alpha$. possible concern with the interpretation of results is related to the implicit assumption of sharp transition on the value of $\alpha$ happening sometime between recombination and the epoch of it is crucial to if this is valid Appart the of $\alpha$ the time of recombination the knowledge of its value at two epochs is relevant as far as the CMB anisotropies are such is the period before* recombination which is important the damping of CMB small scales. is epoch reionization. In this work effectively assume that $\alpha$ is to $\alpha_{rec}$ before recombination reionization epoch. A value of $\alpha$ different from at the epoch of reionization will affect CMB anisotropies through a change in the optical depth $\tau$, *once a cosmological model However, it is also well known that $\tau$ itself dependent on the model through its cosmological parameters ($\Omega_m$ and $\Omega_\Lambda$ for as as on cosmological density perturbations our case through initial power spectrum)
solid lines), second (dashed) and Third (dotteD) peakS in The PoLariZatiOn spectrum, as a fUNctiOn of $\alpha$ at decoupling aNd $\tau$. a (sOMewhAT iDealiZed) descRIpTIOn oF hOw $\AlpHa$ ANd $\Tau$ caN be MeasureD using CMB pOlaRiZation. ](figure3.EPs){Width="3.5in"}

The OutStanding effeCt oF reionIzAtiON is to IntRoducE a bump IN the poLarizatioN sPEctrum AT large aNGUlAr scAles (lower left paneL). thIS bump is produceD well aFtER dECOupLinG (at much lowEr RedshIFts), when $\ALpHA$, IF vaRYing, is much cloSer to the preSEnt Day’s vaLuE. If THe valuE of $\alPhA$ At lOw redshift iS difFerent froM that aT DecouplINg, the peAks in tHe pOlaRizaTIoN pOweR sPEctRUm At sMAll Angular sCaLeS will Be shIFTED sidEwaYs, whIle thE reionization BumP on lARge AngulAr scaLes wOn’T (loweR right Panel). it Follows that by meAsurIng the sepAraTiOn bEtWeen tHE normaL peAks And the bUmp, one cAN meAsURE BoTh $\alpha$ and $\tau$, as illUsTRAtEd in Fig. \[fIgpeakS\]. thUs WE expect tHaT thE exiSTEnce oF an eARlY reionizAtion ePOcH wIll, when MoRe accuRaTe cOsmIc micROwavE backgRound polArizaTIon data is availABle, lead to consIDeRABlY TighTer Constraints On $\alPHa$.

A pOssiBLe ConCErn wiTh the InTErPRetation of our resultS iS relatEd to tHe implicit assUmption of a SHARp transiTion ON tHE value of $\alpha$ hAppenIng sometimE Between rEcombInation aNd the epocH OF reionizAtiOn. HEncE, it IS CrUcial to undersTANd if ThIs is a vaLid ApproxiMatIon. appArt FrOm the valuE of $\alpha$ At ThE tImE of RecomBInation tHe KnoWlEdgE of itS Value aT two oTher EpOcHS is RelevanT As FAR as tHe cMb aniSotRoPies aRe coNCerNed. One sUch epoch iS thE PeriOd *JuSt beforE* recombinatioN wHich is very ImPorTant foR THe dampinG of CMB anisotropies on smaLL angulaR scAles. THe otHer period Is tHe epocH of REionizAtion. IN this WoRk wE EFfectIVElY asSuMe that $\alphA$ IS eqUal to $\AlPha_{rEc}$ beforE recombination and tO $\AlpHa_0$ at the reioniZatIon ePOCh.

a vaLUe OF $\alPhA$ DifFERent from $\alpha_0$ at The epoch of ReIOnIzation wilL AffEcT the CMB AnisotrOpies THrough a Change in tHe optical DePth $\tAU$, *OncE a single coSmologicAl model is ASsumeD*. hoWever, It iS also wElL knOwn thAt $\tau$ iS ItsElf dePendenT oN the coSmoloGiCal model Through its cosmological pArametErs ($\OmEga_M$ and $\Omega_\lamBDa$ fOr example) As weLl as on the cOsmOloGical DenSIty peRturBAtIonS (In our Case THrough the INiTiaL POwEr spectrum) [@pEDROl
solid lines), second (dash ed) and th ird ( dot ted )peak s in  the polarizat i on s pectrum, as a function  of $ \a l pha$ at  deco uplinga nd $ \ta u$ .A ( so m ew hat i dea lized)descriptio n o fhow $\alpha$ an d $\tau$ c anbe measuredusi ng CMB  p ola r izati on.  ](fi gure3. e ps){wi dth="3.5i n" } 

Theo utstand i n geffe ct of reionizatio n  i s  to introducea bump  i n  t h e  po lar ization sp ec truma t large an g u l ars cales (lowerleft panel) .  Th is bum pisp roduce d wel la fte r decouplin g (a t much lo wer re d shifts) ,  when $ \alpha $,ifvary i ng ,ismu c h c l os ert o t he prese nt  d ay’svalu e . I f th e v alue  of $ \alpha$ at lo w r edsh i ftis di ffere nt f ro m tha t at d ecoup li ng, the peaks i n th e polariz ati on  po we r spe c trum a t s mal l angul ar scal e s w il l b eshifted sideways,wh i l ethe reio nizati o nbu m p on lar ge  an gula r scale s wo n ’t  (lowerrightp an el ). It f ol lows t ha t b y m easur i ng t he sep arationbetwe e n the normal p e aks and the b u mp , on e  can  me asure both$\al p ha$and$ \t au$ ,  as i llust ra t ed in Fig. \[figpeaks\ ].  Thuswe ex pect that the  existence o f  an earl y re i on i zation epoch w ill,when morea ccuratecosmi c microw ave backg r o und pola riz ati ondat a is  available, l e a d to  c onsider abl y tight ercon str ain ts  on $\alp ha$.

Apo ss ib le  co ncern with the  i nte rp ret ation of our  resu ltsis  r e lat ed to t h ei m plic it  a ssum pti on  of a  sha r p t ransiti on on the  va l ue o f$\ alpha$happening som et ime betwee nrec ombina t i on and t he epoch of reionizatio n . Hence , i t iscruc ial to un der standift his is  a val id ap pr oxi m a tion. A pp art  f rom the va l u e o f $\a lp ha$at thetime of recombinat i onthe knowledge  of  its v al uea tt woot h ere p ochs is relevan t as far a st he  CMB aniso t rop ie s are c oncerne d. On e  such e poch is t he period  * just b efo re* recomb inationwhich isv ery i m po rtant  fo r theda mpi ng of  CMB a n iso tropi es onsm all an gular  s cales. T he other period is theepochof re ion ization.Int his  work weeffe ctively as sum e t hat $ \al p ha$ i s eq u al  to $\alp ha_{ r ec}$ befo r erec o m bi nation andt o $\a lpha_ 0$a t thereio nization epoch.
A  value of $\al pha$ d iff ere n t fr om  $\alpha_0$ at  th ee p och of r ei onization w ill affe ct the C MB ani sotrop ies thr o u gh a chan ge i n t he optica l d ep t h $\tau $,  * o nce asing le  cosmo logica l  mod e l  is assumed*. Ho wever , it is als o wel lknown t h at $ \tau$ is i tself depen dent o n th e cos mologic al  model  th ro ugh its co s mological  para meters($ \Ome ga_ m$ and  $\O m e ga_\L ambd a$  fo r example ) as we ll ason t he co sm olog ical dens i ty pertu rba t ions (i nour c ase th r ou g h  the initi alpower s pectrum) [ @ pedr o l
solid lines),_second (dashed)_and third (dotted) peaks_in the_polarization_spectrum, as_a_function of $\alpha$_at decoupling and_$\tau$. A (somewhat idealized)_description of how_$\alpha$_and $\tau$ can be measured using CMB polarization. ](figure3.eps){width="3.5in"}

The outstanding effect of reionization is_to_introduce a_bump_in_the polarization spectrum at large_angular scales (lower left panel)._This bump_is produced well after decoupling (at much lower_redshifts),_when $\alpha$, if_varying, is much closer to the present day’s value._If the value of $\alpha$ at_low redshift is_different_from_that at decoupling, the_peaks in the polarization power spectrum_at small angular scales will be_shifted sideways, while the reionization bump on_large angular scales won’t (lower right_panel). It follows that by_measuring the_separation between the normal peaks_and the bump,_one can_measure both $\alpha$_and $\tau$, as illustrated in Fig._\[figpeaks\]. Thus we_expect that the existence of an_early_reionization epoch will,_when_more_accurate cosmic_microwave background polarization_data_is available,_lead_to considerably tighter constraints on $\alpha$.

A_possible_concern with the interpretation of our results_is related to the_implicit_assumption of a sharp_transition on the value of_$\alpha$ happening sometime between recombination and_the epoch_of reionization._Hence, it is crucial to understand if this is a valid_approximation. Appart from the value of_$\alpha$ at the time_of recombination_the_knowledge of its_value_at two_other epochs is relevant as far as_the CMB_anisotropies are concerned. One such epoch_is the period *just_before*_recombination which is very important for_the damping of CMB anisotropies on_small angular scales. The other_period_is_the epoch of reionization. In_this work we effectively assume that_$\alpha$ is equal_to $\alpha_{rec}$ before recombination and to $\alpha_0$_at_the reionization epoch.

A value of $\alpha$_different_from $\alpha_0$ at the epoch of_reionization_will_affect the CMB anisotropies through_a change in the optical depth_$\tau$, *once a single cosmological model is assumed*. However,_it is also_well known that $\tau$ is_itself_dependent_on the cosmological model through its cosmological parameters ($\Omega_m$ and_$\Omega_\Lambda$ for_example) as well_as on the cosmological density perturbations (in our case through_the initial power spectrum) [@pedrol