 form at the stagnation points of the flow where the compression is at a maximum and the relative velocity differences are at a minimum. The origin of coherence is not so clear, but we speculate that it may be caused by projection, because the line-of-sight length of the matter contributing to the line profile has a minimum at the core center, and small offsets from the center therefore cause little variation in the observed line width.

Molecular cloud cores that harbor protostars in their interior (as identified by the presence of sink particles in our models) are characterized by having $M_{\rm vir}<M$, but for those objects our estimates to $M_{\rm vir}$ are lower limits to the true value. On the other hand, most of the cores without central objects in our simulations have $ M_{\rm vir} > M$, and thus are *not* gravitationally bound. This is in agreement with the observational results of Tachihara et al. (2002) and Morata et al. (2002) for starless cores. However, also some observed “starless” cores seem to lie close to or even fall below the equipartition line (e.g., Caselli et al. 2002), and we speculate that at least some of them may contain as yet undetected young stellar or sub-stellar objects, as is in the case of core L1014 (Young et al. 2004).

The fact that cores in the gravoturbulent model are initially created and confined by the ram pressure from convergent larger-scale flows leads to the velocity dispersion being highest in the low column-density gas at the surface of the clump, either at localized positions or with bow-like shapes. Such structure is often found in detailed high-resolution velocity maps of observed starless cores (e.g., Barranco & Goodman 1998; Goodman et al. 1998; Caselli et al.2002; Tafalla et al. 2004). However, it is not predicted or explained within the framework of star-formation models based on the slow contraction of magnetically subcritical cores mediated by ambipolar diffusion.

Our calculations support an evolutionary sequence where a molecular cloud core is formed by turbulent ram pressure compression. As it gains mass and becomes denser, both its internal kinetic energy and the absolute value of its gravitational energy increase. For some cores, the gravitational attraction may exceed any opposing forces (either thermal or magnetic), and the core goes into collapse to quickly build up
form at the stagnation points of the flow where the compression is at a utmost and the proportional speed differences are at a minimum. The origin of coherence is not so well-defined, but we speculate that it may be caused by project, because the line - of - sight duration of the matter contributing to the tune profile has a minimum at the congress of racial equality plaza, and small offsets from the center therefore cause small variation in the observed line width. 

 Molecular swarm cores that harbor protostars in their interior (as identify by the presence of sinkhole particles in our models) are characterized by having $ M_{\rm vir}<M$, but for those objects our estimate to $ M_{\rm vir}$ are lower limits to the true value. On the other hand, most of the effect without central objects in our simulations have $ M_{\rm vir } > M$, and thus are * not * gravitationally bound. This is in agreement with the observational results of Tachihara et al.   (2002) and Morata et al.   (2002) for starless cores. However, also some ascertained “ starless ” core seem to lie down near to or even decrease below the equipartition line (e.g., Caselli et al.   2002), and we speculate that at least some of them may contain as yet undetected young stellar or sub - leading objects, as is in the case of core L1014 (Young et al.   2004). 

 The fact that cores in the gravoturbulent model are initially created and confined by the ram pressure from convergent larger - scale flows leads to the speed dispersion being high in the abject column - density gas at the surface of the clump, either at localized positions or with bow - alike shapes. Such structure is often found in detailed gamey - resolution speed maps of observed starless cores (e.g., Barranco & Goodman 1998; Goodman et al.   1998; Caselli et al.2002; Tafalla et al.   2004). However, it is not predicted or explain within the framework of ace - formation mannequin based on the slow contraction of magnetically subcritical cores mediated by ambipolar dispersion. 

 Our calculations support an evolutionary sequence where a molecular cloud core is formed by turbulent ram pressure compaction. As it gains mass and become denser, both its internal kinetic energy and the absolute value of its gravitational energy increase. For some cores, the gravitational attraction may exceed any oppose forces (either thermal or magnetic), and the core goes into collapse to quickly build up
 fogm at the stagnation poikts of the flow cyere tie compdession ks at a maximum and the relavive veloxity differences are ag a minimlm. The orugin if coherenrs is nob so dpear, uut we speculatg that it maf be caused by pfolection, because the line-of-sight lengeh of tne matter contrifutimd to nht line profile has a minimum at tge core center, and skall offsets from the centfr tjerefore cause lithle variatiin ig the observea line widuh.

Kolecular dloud cores that harbor protostxrs iu their intgxuor (ds identifixd by nhe presence of sink [articlrs in our modeks) ere xharacterized by haviig $M_{\rm vir}<M$, but for jhose objewta our estimates ti $N_{\rm vhr}$ ase luqer lijivs fo the trne value. On the other yand, most of the cotef without centdal obtests in our simulations have $ M_{\rm vir} > M$, ans thus are *not* gravitatuonally bound. This is in agreeient with the observational results of Tachihara at al. (2002) xnd Mjfqtw et al. (2002) for starless cores. However, also some jgstrvvd “starless” cores seem to lir flpfe to or even fall yslkw the equipartitiln line (e.g., Cqselli et al. 2002), snd we speculate that at leqst some of nhem may contain as yec undetected youmg strllar or sub-stellar objzcts, aa is in the case of dure L1014 (Young et au. 2004).

Thv fawt that cores in the gravoeurbulent modzl are ivitislly cweated and conflted by the ram predsure fsom converhent larger-scale flows leads to the velocity civpegsion beiug higmest in the low column-density gas at the rurface of the clnmp, either ae localized pmditions or wmth bow-lihe syapew. Such rgructure is ofyen found in detailwd high-resolution yelockfy maps of obsexree starless corex (e.e., Bwrganro & Gjmdman 1998; Goodmdn eg au. 1998; Caseuli et al.2002; Tcfxlla et al. 2004). However, it is not predicted or explsiked withib the frwmework of stsr-formation models basev on tie sloe cjntraction of magnetically subdritical forcs mediated br amnipojar diffusnon.

Our calculations support an evolutionery sequence where a mooecular cloud core ns formed by vurbulqnt ram psessure compression. Qs it gains mass snd becomes denser, bofh its integnal kinetic energy and the absolute value of its gravitational energy inxrease. For some codes, yhe ggavntacional wttrecvion may exceed amy opposing forces (either thermel or magnatnc), and the core goes into colkaose to quickli build up
form at the stagnation points of the the is at maximum and the a The origin of is not so but we speculate that it may caused by projection, because the line-of-sight length of the matter contributing to the profile has a minimum at the core center, and small offsets from the therefore little in observed line width. Molecular cloud cores that harbor protostars in their interior (as identified by the of sink particles in our models) are characterized having $M_{\rm vir}<M$, but those objects our estimates to vir}$ lower limits the value. the other hand, of the cores without central objects in our simulations have $ M_{\rm vir} > M$, and thus *not* gravitationally is in with observational of Tachihara et and Morata et al. (2002) for also some observed “starless” cores seem to lie to or fall below the equipartition line (e.g., et al. 2002), and we speculate that at some of them may contain as yet undetected young stellar or sub-stellar objects, as is case of core L1014 et al. 2004). fact cores the model are created and confined by the ram pressure from convergent larger-scale flows to the velocity dispersion being highest in the low column-density the of the clump, at localized positions or bow-like Such structure is often detailed velocity starless (e.g., & Goodman 1998; Goodman al. 1998; Caselli et al.2002; et al. 2004). However, explained within the framework of star-formation models based the slow contraction of magnetically subcritical cores by ambipolar diffusion. Our calculations support an evolutionary sequence where a molecular core is turbulent ram pressure compression. As it gains mass becomes denser, both its kinetic energy and the absolute value of its gravitational increase. some cores, gravitational attraction may any opposing forces thermal or magnetic), core goes collapse quickly
 form at the stagnation points Of the flow wHere tHe cOmpReSsioN is aT a maximum and thE RelaTive velocity differenceS are aT a MInimUM. THe oriGin of coHErENCe iS nOt So cLeAR, bUt we sPecUlate thAt it may be cAusEd By projection, BEcAuse the linE-of-Sight length oF thE matteR cOntRIbutiNg tO the lIne proFIle has A minimum aT tHE core cENter, and SMAlL offSets from the center THeREfore cause littLe variAtIOn IN The ObsErved line wIdTh.

MolECular clOUd COREs tHAt harbor protoStars in theiR IntErior (aS iDenTIfied bY the pReSEncE of sink partIcleS in our modEls) are CHaracteRIzed by hAving $M_{\Rm vIr}<M$, But fOR tHoSe oBjECts OUr EstIMatEs to $M_{\rm vIr}$ ArE loweR limITS TO the TruE valUe. On tHe other hand, moSt oF the COreS withOut ceNtraL oBjectS in our SimulAtIons have $ M_{\rm vir} > M$, And tHus are *not* GraViTatIoNally BOund. ThIs iS in AgreemeNt with tHE obSeRVATiOnal results of TachiHaRA Et Al. (2002) and MorAta et aL. (2002) FoR sTArless coReS. HoWeveR, ALso soMe obSErVed “starlEss” corES sEeM to lie cLoSe to or EvEn fAll Below THe eqUipartItion linE (e.g., CaSElli et al. 2002), and we sPEculate that at LEaST SoME of tHem May contain aS yet UNdetEcteD YoUng STellaR or suB-sTElLAr objects, as is in the cAsE of corE L1014 (YouNg et al. 2004).

The fact That cores iN THE gravotuRbulENt MOdel are initialLy creAted and conFIned by thE ram pRessure fRom converGENt larger-ScaLe fLowS leADS tO the velocity dISPersIoN being hIghEst in thE loW coLumN-deNsIty gas at tHe surfacE oF tHe ClUmp, EitheR At localiZeD poSiTioNs or wITh bow-lIke shApes. suCh STruCture is OFtEN FounD iN dEtaiLed HiGh-resOlutIOn vElocity Maps of obsErvED staRlEsS cores (e.G., Barranco & GoodMaN 1998; Goodman et Al. 1998; casElli et AL.2002; tafalla eT al. 2004). However, it is not predicTEd or expLaiNed wiThin The framewOrk Of star-ForMAtion mOdels bAsed oN tHe sLOW contRACtIon Of MagneticalLY SubCritiCaL corEs mediaTed by ambipolar diffUSioN.

Our calculatiOns SuppORT aN evOLuTIonArY SeqUENce where a molecuLar cloud coRe IS fOrmed by turBUleNt Ram presSure comPressIOn. As it gAins mass aNd becomes DeNser, BOTh iTs internal Kinetic eNergy and tHE absoLUtE valuE of Its graViTatIonal Energy INcrEase. FOr some CoRes, the GraviTaTional atTraction may exceed any oppOsing fOrces (EitHer thermaL or MAgnEtic), and thE corE goes into cOllApsE to quIckLY builD up
 form at the stagnation po ints of th e flo w w her ethecomp ression is ata  max imum and the relativeveloc it y  dif f er ences  are at am i nim um .The  o r ig in of  co herence  is not so  cl ea r, but we sp e cu late thatitmay be cause d b y proj ec tio n , bec aus e the  line- o f-sigh t lengthof the ma t ter con t r ib utin g to the line pro f il e  has a minimum  at th ec or e cen ter , and smal loffse t s fromt he c e nte r  therefore ca use littlev ari ationin  th e  obser ved l in e  wi dth.

Molec ular  cloud co res th a t harbo r  protos tars i n t hei r in t er io r ( as ide n ti fie d  by  the pre se nc e ofsink p a r ticl esin o ur mo dels) are cha rac teri z edby ha ving$M_{ \r m vir }<M$,but f or  those objectsourestimates  to  $ M_{ \r m vir } $ arelow erlimitsto thet rue  v a l u e.  On the other hand ,m o st  of thecoresw it ho u t centra lobj ects i n our  sim u la tions ha ve $ M _ {\ rm  vir} >  M $, and  t hus  ar e *no t * gr avitat ionallybound .  This is in ag r eement with t h eo b se r vati ona l results o f Ta c hiha ra e t  a l.( 2002)  andMo r at a  et al. (2002) forst arless  core s. However, a lso some o b s e rved “st arle s s” cores seem tolie c lose to or even fal l bel ow the e quipartit i o n line ( e.g .,Cas ell i et  al. 2002), a n d  wesp eculate  th at at l eas t s ome  of  t hem may c ontain a sye tun det ected young st el lar  o r s ub-st e llar o bject s, a sis inthe cas e  o f core  L 10 14 ( You ng  et a l. 2 0 04) .

Thefact that  co r es i nth e gravo turbulent mod el  are initi al lycreate d and conf ined by the ram pressur e  from c onv ergen t la rger-scal e f lows l ead s  to th e velo citydi spe r s ion b e i ng  hi gh est in the l owcolum n- dens ity gas  at the surface of the  clump, eithe r a t lo c a li zed po s iti on s  or w ith bow-like sh apes. Such  s t ru cture is o f ten  f ound in  detail ed hi g h-resol ution vel ocity map sof o b s erv ed starles s cores(e.g., Ba r ranco &Goodm an1998;Go odm an et  al. 1 9 98;  Case lli et  a l.2002 ; Taf al la et al . 2004). However, it is  not p redic ted  or expla ine d  wi thin thefram ework of s tar -fo rmati onm odels  bas e dont he sl ow c o ntraction of  ma g n et ically subc r i t ica l cor esm ediate d by  ambipolar diffus i on.

Our calcu lati o n s s upp o rt a nevolutionary s equ en c e  where a  m olecular cl oud core  i s  form ed byturbul ent ram p re s sure c ompr ess ion. As i t g ai n s massan db ecomes  den se r, bot h itsi nter n a l kinetic energy  andt h e abs o lut e val ue  of its grav itationalenergy incr ease.Forsomecores,th e grav ita ti onal attra c tion mayexcee d any o pp osin g f orces(eit h e r the rmal  o r m agnetic), a nd th ec ore  goe s int ocoll apse to q u ickly bu ild up
 form_at the_stagnation points of the_flow where_the_compression is_at_a maximum and_the relative velocity_differences are at a_minimum. The origin_of_coherence is not so clear, but we speculate that it may be caused by_projection,_because the_line-of-sight_length_of the matter contributing to_the line profile has a_minimum at_the core center, and small offsets from the_center_therefore cause little_variation in the observed line width.

Molecular cloud cores that_harbor protostars in their interior (as_identified by the_presence_of_sink particles in our_models) are characterized by having $M_{\rm_vir}<M$, but for those objects our_estimates to $M_{\rm vir}$ are lower limits_to the true value. On the_other hand, most of the_cores without_central objects in our simulations_have $ M_{\rm_vir} >_M$, and thus_are *not* gravitationally bound. This is_in agreement with_the observational results of Tachihara et_al. (2002)_and Morata et_al. (2002)_for_starless cores._However, also some_observed_“starless” cores_seem_to lie close to or even_fall_below the equipartition line (e.g., Caselli et_al. 2002), and we speculate_that_at least some of_them may contain as yet_undetected young stellar or sub-stellar objects,_as is_in the_case of core L1014 (Young et al. 2004).

The fact that cores in_the gravoturbulent model are initially created_and confined by the_ram pressure_from_convergent larger-scale flows_leads_to the_velocity dispersion being highest in the low_column-density gas_at the surface of the clump,_either at localized positions_or_with bow-like shapes. Such structure is_often found in detailed high-resolution velocity_maps of observed starless cores_(e.g.,_Barranco_& Goodman 1998; Goodman et_al. 1998; Caselli et al.2002; Tafalla et_al. 2004). However, it_is not predicted or explained within the_framework_of star-formation models based on the_slow_contraction of magnetically subcritical cores mediated_by_ambipolar_diffusion.

Our calculations support an evolutionary_sequence where a molecular cloud core_is formed by turbulent ram pressure compression. As it_gains mass and_becomes denser, both its internal_kinetic_energy_and the absolute value of its gravitational energy increase. For_some cores,_the gravitational attraction_may exceed any opposing forces (either thermal or magnetic), and_the core goes into collapse to quickly_build up