infty
}\right) <\frac{1}{k}.$$Then, using the estimation $$\mathbb{P}\left[ \left\vert \left[ M^{\left( n_{k}\right) }-M\right] _{\tau
_{k\left( n_{k}\right) }^{n_{k}}}-\left[ M^{\left( n_{k}\right) }-M\right]
_{\tau _{k}^{n_{k}}}\right\vert >\varepsilon \right] \leq \mathbb{P}\left[
\left\{ \sup\limits_{t\in \mathbb{R}_{+}}\left\vert M_{t}^{\left(
n_{k}\right) }-M_{t}\right\vert \geq k\right\} \right],$$it follows that $$d\left( \left[ M^{\left( n_{k}\right) }-M\right] _{\tau _{k\left(
n_{k}\right) }^{n_{k}}},\left[ M^{\left( n_{k}\right) }-M\right] _{\tau
_{k}^{n_{k}}}\right) \underset{k\rightarrow \infty }{\longrightarrow }0,$$which yields a contradiction with $\varepsilon \leq d\left( \left[ M^{\left(
n_{k}\right) }-M\right] _{\infty },0\right) $. Thus, $\left[ M^{\left(
n\right) }-M\right] _{\infty }\overset{\mathbb{P}}{\rightarrow }0.$ The last part of the this lemma follows immediately from the first statement. $\Box $

Using the Doob’s stopping theorem we can conclude that for $M\in \mathcal{M}_{\infty }$ and an stopping time $\tau $, that $M^{\tau }\in \mathcal{M}_{\infty },$ and therefore it follows as a corollary the following result.

\[E\[|(Mn-M)thau|\]-&gt;0=&gt;\[Mn-M\]thau-&gt;0\_in\_P\]For $\left\{ M^{\left(
n\right) }\right\} _{n\in \mathbb{N}}\subset \mathcal{M}_{\infty }$, $M\in 
\mathcal{M}_{\infty }$ and $\tau $ any stopping time holds$$M_{\tau }^{\left( n\
infty 
 } \right) < \frac{1}{k}.$$Then, using the estimation $ $ \mathbb{P}\left [ \left\vert \left [ M^{\left (n_{k}\right) } -M\right ] _ { \tau 
 _ { k\left (n_{k}\right) } ^{n_{k}}}-\left [ M^{\left (n_{k}\right) } -M\right ] 
 _ { \tau _ { k}^{n_{k}}}\right\vert > \varepsilon \right ] \leq \mathbb{P}\left [ 
 \left\ { \sup\limits_{t\in \mathbb{R}_{+}}\left\vert M_{t}^{\left (
 n_{k}\right) } -M_{t}\right\vert \geq k\right\ } \right],$$it follows that $ $ d\left (\left [ M^{\left (n_{k}\right) } -M\right ] _ { \tau _ { k\left (
 n_{k}\right) } ^{n_{k}}},\left [ M^{\left (n_{k}\right) } -M\right ] _ { \tau 
 _ { k}^{n_{k}}}\right) \underset{k\rightarrow \infty } { \longrightarrow } 0,$$which yields a contradiction with $ \varepsilon \leq d\left (\left [ M^{\left (
 n_{k}\right) } -M\right ] _ { \infty }, 0\right) $. therefore, $ \left [ M^{\left (
 n\right) } -M\right ] _ { \infty } \overset{\mathbb{P}}{\rightarrow } 0.$ The final part of the this lemma follows immediately from the inaugural affirmation. $ \Box $ 

 Using the Doob ’s stopping theorem we can reason that for $ M\in \mathcal{M}_{\infty } $ and an stopping time $ \tau $, that $ M^{\tau } \in \mathcal{M}_{\infty }, $ and therefore it come as a corollary the following result. 

 \[E\[|(Mn - M)thau|\]-&gt;0=&gt;\[Mn - M\]thau-&gt;0\_in\_P\]For $ \left\ { M^{\left (
 n\right) } \right\ } _ { n\in \mathbb{N}}\subset \mathcal{M}_{\infty } $, $ M\in 
 \mathcal{M}_{\infty } $ and $ \tau $ any stopping prison term holds$$M_{\tau } ^{\left (n\
infhy
}\right) <\frac{1}{k}.$$Then, using uhe estimation $$\majhvb{P}\lefv[ \left\vsrt \left[ M^{\left( n_{k}\right) }-M\right] _{\tau
_{k\leht( n_{j}\righu) }^{n_{k}}}-\left[ M^{\left( n_{k}\rieht) }-M\righn]
_{\tau _{k}^{n_{k}}}\rught\tert >\varepsilon \cjght] \leq \mathgn{P}\lefc[
\lxft\{ \sup\limits_{t\ik \mathbb{R}_{+}}\lext\vert M_{t}^{\left(
n_{n}\rkgkt) }-M_{t}\right\vert \geq k\right\} \right],$$it fojlows tnah $$d\left( \left[ M^{\jeft( g_{k}\rifht) }-M\right] _{\tau _{k\left(
n_{k}\right) }^{n_{k}}},\left[ M^{\left( i_{k}\right) }-M\right] _{\yau
_{k}^{n_{k}}}\right) \underset{k\rightwrroa \infty }{\longrightagrow }0,$$which ijelqw a contradiztion with $\varepsilon \meq d\left( \left[ M^{\left(
n_{k}\right) }-M\rieht] _{\iufty },0\right) $. Tyus, $\neft[ M^{\left(
n\cight) }-I\right] _{\infty }\overset{\kathbb{P}}{\tightarrow }0.$ Thc lasv paet of the this lemma hollows immediately srom the xixst statement. $\Box $

Usibg the Goob’v stuppivg uheprsm we fan conclude fhat for $M\ib \mathcal{M}_{\infty }$ anc wb stopping tije $\tau $, ehat $M^{\tau }\in \mathcal{M}_{\infty },$ and therefoge if follows as a corollart the following resulj.

\[E\[|(Mn-M)thau|\]-&ge;0=&gt;\[Mn-M\]thau-&gt;0\_in\_P\]For $\left\{ M^{\left(
n\right) }\right\} _{n\in \matvbb{N}}\snbret \mwgycwl{M}_{\infty }$, $M\in 
\mathcal{M}_{\infty }$ and $\tau $ any sto[limg time holds$$M_{\tam }^{\left( n\
infty }\right) <\frac{1}{k}.$$Then, using the estimation $$\mathbb{P}\left[ M^{\left( }-M\right] _{\tau n_{k}\right) }^{n_{k}}}-\left[ M^{\left( \right] \mathbb{P}\left[ \left\{ \sup\limits_{t\in M_{t}^{\left( n_{k}\right) }-M_{t}\right\vert k\right\} \right],$$it follows that $$d\left( \left[ n_{k}\right) }-M\right] _{\tau _{k\left( n_{k}\right) }^{n_{k}}},\left[ M^{\left( n_{k}\right) }-M\right] _{\tau _{k}^{n_{k}}}\right) \underset{k\rightarrow \infty }0,$$which yields a contradiction with $\varepsilon \leq d\left( \left[ M^{\left( n_{k}\right) }-M\right] _{\infty $. $\left[ n\right) _{\infty }\overset{\mathbb{P}}{\rightarrow }0.$ The last part of the this lemma follows immediately from the first statement. $ Using the Doob’s stopping theorem we can that for $M\in \mathcal{M}_{\infty and an stopping time $\tau that }\in \mathcal{M}_{\infty and it as a corollary following result. \[E\[|(Mn-M)thau|\]-&gt;0=&gt;\[Mn-M\]thau-&gt;0\_in\_P\]For $\left\{ M^{\left( n\right) }\right\} _{n\in \mathbb{N}}\subset \mathcal{M}_{\infty }$, $M\in \mathcal{M}_{\infty }$ and $\tau $ stopping time n\
infty
}\right) <\frac{1}{k}.$$Then, using tHe estimatiOn $$\matHbb{p}\leFt[ \Left\Vert \Left[ M^{\left( n_{k}\rigHT) }-M\riGht] _{\tau
_{k\left( n_{k}\right) }^{n_{k}}}-\leFt[ M^{\leFt( N_{K}\rigHT) }-M\Right]
_{\Tau _{k}^{n_{k}}}\rIGhT\VErt >\VaRePsiLoN \RiGht] \leQ \maThbb{P}\leFt[
\left\{ \sup\lImiTs_{T\in \mathbb{R}_{+}}\leFT\vErt M_{t}^{\left(
n_{K}\riGht) }-M_{t}\right\veRt \gEq k\rigHt\} \RigHT],$$it foLloWs thaT $$d\left( \LEft[ M^{\leFt( n_{k}\right) }-m\rIGht] _{\tau _{K\Left(
n_{k}\rIGHt) }^{N_{k}}},\leFt[ M^{\left( n_{k}\right) }-M\riGHt] _{\TAu
_{k}^{n_{k}}}\right) \undeRset{k\rIgHTaRROw \iNftY }{\longrightArRow }0,$$whICh yieldS A cONTRadICtion with $\varePsilon \leq d\lEFt( \lEft[ M^{\leFt(
N_{k}\rIGht) }-M\riGht] _{\inFtY },0\RigHt) $. Thus, $\left[ M^{\Left(
N\right) }-M\riGht] _{\infTY }\overseT{\Mathbb{P}}{\RightaRroW }0.$ ThE lasT PaRt Of tHe THis LEmMa fOLloWs immediAtElY from The fIRST StatEmeNt. $\BoX $

UsinG the Doob’s stopPinG theORem We can ConclUde tHaT for $M\In \mathCal{M}_{\iNfTy }$ and an stopping Time $\Tau $, that $M^{\tAu }\iN \mAthCaL{M}_{\infTY },$ and thEreForE it follOws as a cORolLaRY THe Following result.

\[E\[|(Mn-m)tHAU|\]-&gT;0=&gt;\[Mn-M\]thAu-&gt;0\_in\_p\]foR $\lEFt\{ M^{\left(
n\RiGht) }\RighT\} _{N\In \matHbb{N}}\SUbSet \mathcAl{M}_{\infTY }$, $M\In 
\Mathcal{m}_{\iNfty }$ anD $\tAu $ aNy sToppiNG timE holds$$m_{\tau }^{\left( N\
infty
}\right) <\frac{1}{k }.$$Then,using  th e e st imat ion$$\mathbb{P}\l e ft[\left\vert \left[ M^{\ left(  n _ {k}\ r ig ht) } -M\righ t ]_ { \ta u_{ k\l ef t (n_{k} \ri ght) }^ {n_{k}}}-\ lef t[  M^{\left( n _ {k }\right) } -M\ right]
_{\ta u _ {k}^{n _{ k}} } \righ t\v ert > \varep s ilon \ right] \l eq \mathb b {P}\lef t [ 
\ left \{ \sup\limits_{t \ in \mathbb{R}_{+} }\left \v e rt M _{t }^{ \left(
n_{ k} \righ t ) }-M_{ t }\ r i g ht\ v ert \geq k\ri ght\} \righ t ],$ $it fo ll ows that $ $d\le ft (  \l eft[ M^{\le ft(n_{k}\rig ht) }- M \right] _{\tau_{k\le ft( 
n_ {k}\ r ig ht ) } ^{ n _{k } }} ,\l e ft[  M^{\lef t(  n _{k}\ righ t ) } -M\r igh t] _ {\tau 
_{k}^{n_{k}} }\r ight )  \u nders et{k\ righ ta rrow\infty  }{\l on grightarrow }0, $$wh ich yield s a  c ont ra dicti o n with  $\ var epsilon  \leq d \ lef t( \ l ef t[ M^{\left(
n_{k} \r i g ht ) }-M\ri ght] _ { \i nf t y },0\ri gh t)$. T h u s, $\ left [  M ^{\left( 
n\rig h t)  } -M\righ t]  _{\in ft y } \ov erset { \mat hbb{P} }{\right arrow }0.$ The lastp art of the th i sl e mm a  fol low s immediate ly f r om t he f i rs t s t ateme nt. $ \B o x$ 

Using the Doob’sst opping  theo rem we can co nclude tha t f or $M\in  \ma t hc a l{M}_{\infty } $ and  an stoppi n g time $ \tau$, that$M^{\tau} \ in \math cal {M} _{\ inf t y  } ,$ and theref o r e it  f ollowsasa corol lar y t hefol lo wing resu lt.

\[E \[ |( Mn -M )th au|\] - &gt;0=&g t; \[M n- M\] thau- & gt;0\_ in\_P \]Fo r$\ l eft \{ M^{\ l ef t ( 
n\r ig ht ) }\ rig ht \} _{ n\in \ma thbb{N} }\subset\ma t hcal {M }_ {\infty  }$, $M\in 
\ ma thcal{M}_{ \i nft y }$ a n d  $\tau $  any stopping time hold s $$M_{\t au}^{\l eft(  n\
infty
}\right) <\frac{1}{k}.$$Then,_using the_estimation $$\mathbb{P}\left[ \left\vert \left[_M^{\left( n_{k}\right)_}-M\right]__{\tau
_{k\left( n_{k}\right)_}^{n_{k}}}-\left[_M^{\left( n_{k}\right) }-M\right]
_{\tau__{k}^{n_{k}}}\right\vert >\varepsilon \right]_\leq \mathbb{P}\left[
\left\{ \sup\limits_{t\in \mathbb{R}_{+}}\left\vert_M_{t}^{\left(
n_{k}\right) }-M_{t}\right\vert \geq_k\right\}_\right],$$it follows that $$d\left( \left[ M^{\left( n_{k}\right) }-M\right] _{\tau _{k\left(
n_{k}\right) }^{n_{k}}},\left[ M^{\left( n_{k}\right) }-M\right]__{\tau
_{k}^{n_{k}}}\right)_\underset{k\rightarrow \infty_}{\longrightarrow_}0,$$which_yields a contradiction with $\varepsilon_\leq d\left( \left[ M^{\left(
n_{k}\right) }-M\right]__{\infty },0\right)_$. Thus, $\left[ M^{\left(
n\right) }-M\right] _{\infty }\overset{\mathbb{P}}{\rightarrow }0.$_The_last part of_the this lemma follows immediately from the first statement._$\Box $

Using the Doob’s stopping theorem_we can conclude_that_for_$M\in \mathcal{M}_{\infty }$ and_an stopping time $\tau $, that_$M^{\tau }\in \mathcal{M}_{\infty },$ and therefore_it follows as a corollary the following_result.

\[E\[|(Mn-M)thau|\]-&gt;0=&gt;\[Mn-M\]thau-&gt;0\_in\_P\]For $\left\{ M^{\left(
n\right) }\right\} _{n\in \mathbb{N}}\subset_\mathcal{M}_{\infty }$, $M\in 
\mathcal{M}_{\infty }$_and $\tau_$ any stopping time holds$$M_{\tau_}^{\left( n\