 the modeling, there is not a strict cutoff frequency which separates the propagating (high-frequency) waves from the non-propagating (evanescent, low-frequency) waves. Instead, all frequencies are propagated and reflected simultaneously, and the ratio of propagation versus reflection grows with frequency. Although there is no cutoff frequency, an effective cutoff frequency, separating mainly propagating waves from mainly non-propagating waves, can be defined. The parameters determined from this fitting for all the analyzed pairs of lines are displayed in Table \[table:parameters\].

![Same as Fig. \[fig:dphase\_CaHe\] but for the line pair  10839 Å and  10827 Å.[]{data-label="fig:dphase_CaSi"}](dphase_CaSi_total.eps){width="9cm"}

![Same as Fig. \[fig:dphase\_CaHe\] but for the line pair  10827 Å and  5434.534 Å.[]{data-label="fig:dphase_SiFe"}](dphase_SiFe_total.eps){width="9cm"}

   Line Pair   T (K)   $\Delta z$ (km)   $\tau_{\rm R}$ (s)   $\omega_{\rm c}$ (mHz)
  ----------- ------- ----------------- -------------------- ------------------------
      -        4000          130                 30                    5.0
      -        3000          200                 20                    6.0
      -        3500          750                 40                    3.6
      -        7000          150                 20                    3.1
      -        4000         1100                 40                    3.3
      -        4000         1000                 40                    3.3

  : \[table:parameters\] [Parameters for phase and amplification spectra fits and observed cutoff frequency]{}

[The first column indicates the pair of lines used in the analysis, second to fourth columns are the temperature ($T$), difference in formation heights ($\Delta z$), and characteristic timescale of the radiative losses ($\tau_{\rm R}$) retrieved from the fit of the phase and amplification spectra to a model of linear wave propagation in a gravitationally stratifed atmosphere with radiative losses, and the last column in the observationally measured cutoff frequency ($\omega_{\rm c}$).]{}

Figure \[fig:dphase\_CaHe\] indicates that propagating waves go upwards in the umbral atmosphere. The examination of
the modeling, there is not a strict cutoff frequency which distinguish the propagate (high - frequency) waves from the non - propagating (evanescent, low - frequency) wave. Instead, all frequencies are spread and reflect simultaneously, and the ratio of generation versus mirror image grows with frequency. Although there be no cutoff frequency, an effective cutoff frequency, distinguish mainly propagating waves from mainly non - propagating waves, can be defined. The parameter determined from this fitting for all the analyzed pairs of line are displayed in Table \[table: parameters\ ]. 

! [ Same as Fig. \[fig: dphase\_CaHe\ ] but for the line pair   10839 Å   and   10827 Å.[]{data - label="fig: dphase_CaSi"}](dphase_CaSi_total.eps){width="9 centimeter " } 

! [ Same as Fig. \[fig: dphase\_CaHe\ ] but for the line pair   10827 Å   and   5434.534 Å.[]{data - label="fig: dphase_SiFe"}](dphase_SiFe_total.eps){width="9 cm " } 

    Line Pair    T (K)    $ \Delta z$ (km)    $ \tau_{\rm R}$ (s)    $ \omega_{\rm c}$ (mHz) 
   ----------- ------- ----------------- -------------------- ------------------------ 
       -         4000           130                  30                     5.0 
       -         3000           200                  20                     6.0 
       -         3500           750                  40                     3.6 
       -         7000           150                  20                     3.1 
       -         4000          1100                  40                     3.3 
       -         4000          1000                  40                     3.3 

  : \[table: parameters\ ] [ Parameters for phase and amplification spectra fits and ascertained cutoff frequency ] { } 

 [ The first column indicates the pair of lines used in the psychoanalysis, second to fourth column are the temperature ($ T$), difference in formation heights ($ \Delta z$), and characteristic timescale of the radiative losses ($ \tau_{\rm R}$) retrieved from the fit of the phase and amplification spectra to a model of linear wave propagation in a gravitationally stratifed standard atmosphere with radiative losses, and the last column in the observationally measure shortcut frequency ($ \omega_{\rm c}$). ] { } 

 Figure \[fig: dphase\_CaHe\ ] indicate that propagating waves go upwards in the umbral atmosphere. The examination of
 thf modeling, there is not x strict cutoff frequeicy whidh separxtes the propagating (high-freeuwncy) qaves from the non-propxgating (enanescent, low-hrequency) waves. Mhstead, all frseueneixs are propagatgd and reflewted simultanemurlv, and the ratio of propagation versuf reflevtlon grows with freatencg. Although there is no cutoff freqhency, ai effective cutpff frequency, separating mwinlj propagating waved from mainoy njb-propagating waves, can be defined. Jhe parameters determined from tfis fntting for qlo tjg analyzed peirs os lines are displayeg in Tanle \[table:paramcters\].

![Vamw as Fig. \[fig:dphase\_CaHx\] but for the line pwir  10839 Å and  10827 Å.[]{dcta-label="fig:dphase_CaSi"}](epyase_CdSi_tmtal.dps){wkdtg="9ck"}

![Szme as Fij. \[fig:dphase\_DaHe\] but foe the line pair  10827 Å anc  5434.534 Å.[]{eata-label="fig:dlhase_SyFq"}](dphase_SiFe_total.eps){width="9cm"}

   Line Pair   T (K)   $\Delta z$ (km)   $\tau_{\rm R}$ (s)   $\omega_{\rm c}$ (mHz)
  ----------- ------- ----------------- -------------------- ------------------------
      -        4000          130                 30                    5.0
      -        3000          200                 20                    6.0
      -        3500          750                 40                    3.6
      -        7000          150                 20                    3.1
      -        4000         1100                 40                    3.3
      -        4000         1000                 40                    3.3

  : \[gabke:[arameters\] [Parameters for [hase and ampkificatkon xpectrw fits and obseveed cutoff frequenfy]{}

[The fhrst columj indicates the pair of lines used in the anakyvis, second co fouvth columns are the temperatute ($T$), diffzrence in formatpon heighvs ($\Delta z$), agd characterivjic timescale of the wadiqtivw losser ($\tau_{\rm R}$) retrirved from the fit od the phase and amilifizztion spectra ti a model of lineat wxve pgopegatijt in a gravidatiunauky stfatifed atmirphete with radiative lovses, and the last colukn in the ibservatyonally measuted cutoff frequenfy ($\omxga_{\rm r}$).]{}

Figurr \[fyg:dphase\_CaHe\] indicates that prkpagating wayes go upwardf in the umbral ctmosphere. The examination of
the modeling, there is not a strict which the propagating waves from the all are propagated and simultaneously, and the of propagation versus reflection grows with Although there is no cutoff frequency, an effective cutoff frequency, separating mainly propagating from mainly non-propagating waves, can be defined. The parameters determined from this fitting all analyzed of are displayed in Table \[table:parameters\]. ![Same as Fig. \[fig:dphase\_CaHe\] but for the line pair 10839 Å 10827 Å.[]{data-label="fig:dphase_CaSi"}](dphase_CaSi_total.eps){width="9cm"} ![Same as Fig. \[fig:dphase\_CaHe\] but for line pair 10827 Å 5434.534 Å.[]{data-label="fig:dphase_SiFe"}](dphase_SiFe_total.eps){width="9cm"} Line Pair T $\Delta (km) $\tau_{\rm (s) c}$ ----------- ------- ----------------- ------------------------ - 4000 130 30 5.0 - 3000 200 20 6.0 - 3500 750 40 3.6 - 150 20 4000 1100 3.3 4000 40 3.3 : for phase and amplification spectra fits frequency]{} [The first column indicates the pair of used in analysis, second to fourth columns are temperature ($T$), difference in formation heights ($\Delta z$), characteristic timescale of the radiative losses ($\tau_{\rm R}$) retrieved from the fit of the phase spectra to a model linear wave propagation a stratifed with losses, and last column in the observationally measured cutoff frequency ($\omega_{\rm c}$).]{} Figure indicates that propagating waves go upwards in the umbral atmosphere. of
 the modeling, there is not a strIct cutoff fRequeNcy WhiCh SepaRateS the propagatinG (High-Frequency) waves from the nOn-proPaGAtinG (EvAnescEnt, low-fREqUENcy) WaVeS. InStEAd, All frEquEncies aRe propagatEd aNd Reflected simULtAneously, anD thE ratio of propAgaTion veRsUs rEFlectIon Grows With frEQuency. although tHeRE is no cUToff freQUEnCy, an Effective cutoff frEQuENcy, separating mAinly pRoPAgATIng WavEs from mainLy Non-prOPagatinG WaVES, Can BE defined. The paRameters detERmiNed froM tHis FItting For alL tHE anAlyzed pairs Of liNes are disPlayed IN Table \[tABle:paraMeters\].

![samE as fig. \[fIG:dPhAse\_cahE\] buT FoR thE LinE pair  10839 Å anD  10827 Å.[]{DaTa-labEl="fiG:DPHAse_CASi"}](DphaSe_CaSI_total.eps){widtH="9cm"}

![same AS FiG. \[fig:dPhase\_caHe\] BuT for tHe line Pair  10827 Å AnD  5434.534 Å.[]{data-label="fig:dPhasE_SiFe"}](dphaSe_SIFE_toTaL.eps){wIDth="9cm"}

   LIne paiR   T (K)   $\DeltA z$ (km)   $\tau_{\RM R}$ (s)   $\OmEGA_{\Rm C}$ (mHz)
  ----------- ------- ----------------- -------------------- ------------------------
      -        4000          130                 30                    5.0
      -        3000          200                 20                    6.0
      -        3500          750                 40                    3.6
      -        7000          150                 20                    3.1
      -        4000         1100                 40                    3.3
      -        4000         1000                 40                    3.3

  : \[table:parameterS\] [PARAmEters for Phase aND aMpLIficatioN sPecTra fITS and oBserVEd Cutoff frEquencY]{}

[thE fIrst colUmN indicAtEs tHe pAir of LInes Used in The analySis, seCOnd to fourth colUMns are the tempERaTURe ($t$), DiffEreNce in formatIon hEIghtS ($\DelTA z$), And CHaracTerisTiC TiMEscale of the radiativE lOsses ($\tAu_{\rm R}$) Retrieved from The fit of thE PHAse and amPlifICaTIon spectra to a mOdel oF linear wavE PropagatIon in A gravitaTionally sTRAtifed atMosPheRe wIth RADiAtive losses, anD THe laSt Column iN thE observAtiOnaLly MeaSuRed cutoff FrequencY ($\oMeGa_{\Rm C}$).]{}

FiGure \[fIG:dphase\_CAHE\] inDiCatEs thaT PropagAting WaveS gO uPWarDs in the UMbRAL atmOsPhEre. THe eXaMinatIon oF
 the modeling, there is no t a strict  cuto fffre qu ency  whi ch separates t h e pr opagating (high-freque ncy)wa v es f r om  thenon-pro p ag a t ing  ( ev ane sc e nt , low -fr equency ) waves. I nst ea d, all frequ e nc ies are pr opa gated and re fle cted s im ult a neous ly,  andthe ra t io ofpropagati on versus reflect i o ngrow s with frequency. Al t hough there is  no cu to f ff r equ enc y, an effe ct ive c u toff fr e qu e n c y,s eparating mai nly propaga t ing  waves  f rom mainly  non- pr o pag ating waves , ca n be defi ned. T h e param e ters de termin edfro m th i sfi tti ng for al l t h e a nalyzedpa ir s ofline s a r e di spl ayed  in T able \[table: par amet e rs\ ].

! [Same  asFi g. \[ fig:dp hase\ _C aHe\] but for t he l ine pair 10 83 9 Å  a nd  1 0 827 Å. []{ dat a-label ="fig:d p has e_ C a S i" }](dphase_CaSi_tot al . e ps ){width= "9cm"} 
! [S a me as Fi g.  \[ fig: d p hase\ _CaH e \]  but for  the l i ne  p air  10 82 7 Å an d 54 34. 534 Å . []{d ata-la bel="fig :dpha s e_SiFe"}](dpha s e_SiFe_total. e ps ) { wi d th=" 9cm "}

   Line  Pai r    T  (K)  $\D e lta z $ (km ) $ \ tau_{\rm R}$ (s)  $\ omega_ {\rmc}$ (mHz)
  - ---------- - - ----- -- ---- - -- - ------- ------ ----- ---------- -------- ----- -------- --
     -        4 000       1 30               30                 5. 0
    -        300 0        2 00              20               6. 0
     -     3500     75 0           40                3. 6
   -      70 00          1 50               20                3.1
      -      4000        110 0              40               3 .3    -     4 000      100 0             40                 3.3

  : \[ta ble :par a m et ers \ ][ Par am e ter s for phase and a mplificati on sp ectra fits and  o bserved  cutoff  freq u ency]{} 

[The fi rst colum nindi c a tes  the pairof lines  used int he an a ly sis,sec ond to  f our th co lumnsa rethe t empera tu re ($T $), d if ferencein formation heights ($ \Delta  z$),  an d charact eri s tic  timescal e of  the radia tiv e l osses  ($ \ tau_{ \rmR }$ ) r e triev ed f r om the fi t  o f t h e  p hase and am p l i fic ation  sp e ctra t o amodel of linear w a ve propagation  ina gra vit a tion al ly stratifed a tmo sp h e re withra diative los ses, and  t h e las t colu mn inthe obs e r va t ionall y me asu red cutof f f re q uency ( $\ om e ga_{\r m c} $) .]{}
Figure \[fi g : dphase\_CaHe\] i ndica t e s tha t  pr opaga ti ng wave s  goupwards in  the umbral  atmos pher e. Th e exami na tion o f
 the_modeling, there_is not a strict_cutoff frequency_which_separates the_propagating_(high-frequency) waves from_the non-propagating (evanescent,_low-frequency) waves. Instead, all_frequencies are propagated_and_reflected simultaneously, and the ratio of propagation versus reflection grows with frequency. Although there_is_no cutoff_frequency,_an_effective cutoff frequency, separating mainly_propagating waves from mainly non-propagating_waves, can_be defined. The parameters determined from this fitting_for_all the analyzed_pairs of lines are displayed in Table \[table:parameters\].

![Same as_Fig. \[fig:dphase\_CaHe\] but for the line_pair  10839 Å and_ 10827_Å.[]{data-label="fig:dphase_CaSi"}](dphase_CaSi_total.eps){width="9cm"}

![Same_as Fig. \[fig:dphase\_CaHe\] but_for the line pair  10827 Å and_ 5434.534 Å.[]{data-label="fig:dphase_SiFe"}](dphase_SiFe_total.eps){width="9cm"}

   Line Pair_  T (K)   $\Delta_z$ (km)   $\tau_{\rm R}$_(s)   $\omega_{\rm c}$_(mHz)
 _----------- ------- ----------------- -------------------- ------------------------
_  _  -_   _   4000  _  _    130 __  ___ _  __ __30     __      _   __ 5.0
  _   -   _    3000 _ _ _    200      _     _   _20 __  __ _      _ _  6.0
   _  -   __   3500  _     _ 750   ___    _     _40  _      __     __  3.6
   __ -_     _ 7000    _     150   _  _    ___   20      _ _  _        3.1
 _    -    _   4000       _ 1100      _      _   40__      ____  _  _  3.3
_ _   -_  _  __4000         1000        _     _  40  __  _   _       _ 3.3

  : \[table:parameters\] [Parameters for phase and_amplification_spectra fits_and observed cutoff frequency]{}

[The_first column_indicates the_pair of lines_used in_the analysis,_second to_fourth columns are the temperature ($T$), difference_in_formation heights ($\Delta z$), and characteristic timescale of the_radiative_losses_($\tau_{\rm_R}$) retrieved from_the fit of_the phase and_amplification spectra to_a_model of linear wave propagation in_a gravitationally stratifed_atmosphere with radiative losses,_and the last column in the observationally measured cutoff frequency_($\omega_{\rm c}$).]{}

Figure \[fig:dphase\_CaHe\] indicates that propagating waves go upwards in the umbral atmosphere. The examination of