 of $\tilde{X}_{\Lambda}(\varrho)$ can be measured with help of the spectrum estimator [@Estimator], which requires estimation of only $d^{2}$ parameters which (because of affinity) are in one to one correspondence with the needed spectrum of (\[PositiveMaps1\]). Note that for $2{\otimes}2$ systems (the composite system of two qubits), similar approaches lead to the method of detection of entanglement measures (concurrence [@Concurrence] and entanglement of formation [@EoF]) without the state reconstruction [@PHPRL].

The disadvantage of the above method is [@Carteret] that realization of SPA requires addition the noise to the system (we have to put some controlled ancillas, couple the system, and then trace them out). In Ref. [@Carteret] the question was raised about the existence of noiseless quantum networks, i.e., those of which the only input data are: (i) unknown quantum information represented by $\varrho^{{\otimes}m}$ (ii) the controlled measured qubit which reproduces us the spectrum moments (see Ref. [@Estimator]). It was shown that for at least one positive map (transposition) $T$ the noiseless network exists [@Carteret]. Such networks for two-qubit concurrence and three-qubit tangle have also been designed [@Carteret2].

In the present paper we ask a general question: do noiseless networks work only for special maps (functions) or do they exist for any positive map test? In the case of a positive answer to the latter: is it possible to design a general method for constructing them? Can it be adopted to any criteria other than the one defined in (\[PositiveMaps1\])?

For this purpose we first show how to measure a spectrum of the matrix $\Theta(\varrho)$, where $\Theta :
\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{C}^{m})\rightarrow\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{C}^{m})$ is an arbitrary linear, hermiticity-preserving map and $\varrho$ is a given density operator acting on $\mathbb{C}^{m}$, with the help of only $m$ parameters estimated instead of $m^{2}-1$. For bipartite $\varrho$ where $m=d^{2}$ this gives $d^{2}$ instead of $d^{4}-1$. This approach is consistent with previous results [@Grassl; @Leifer; @Brun] where arbitrary
of $ \tilde{X}_{\Lambda}(\varrho)$ can be measured with help of the spectrum estimator [ @Estimator ], which requires estimate of merely $ d^{2}$ parameters which (because of affinity) are in one to one correspondence with the needed spectrum of (\[PositiveMaps1\ ]). Note that for $ 2{\otimes}2 $ system (the composite system of two qubits), similar approach lead to the method of signal detection of web measures (concurrence [ @Concurrence ] and entanglement of geological formation [ @EoF ]) without the state reconstruction [ @PHPRL ]. 

 The disadvantage of the above method is [ @Carteret ] that realization of SPA requires accession the noise to the system (we have to put some controlled ancillas, couple the system, and then hound them out). In Ref. [ @Carteret ] the question was raised about the existence of noiseless quantum network, i.e., those of which the only input data are: (i) nameless quantum information represented by $ \varrho^{{\otimes}m}$ (ii) the controlled measured qubit which reproduces us the spectrum moment (see Ref. [ @Estimator ]). It was shown that for at least one positive map (transposition) $ T$ the noiseless net exist [ @Carteret ]. Such networks for two - qubit concurrence and three - qubit tangle have also been designed [ @Carteret2 ]. 

 In the present paper we ask a general question: do noiseless networks work merely for special maps (routine) or do they exist for any positive map test? In the case of a plus solution to the latter: is it possible to design a general method acting for constructing them? Can it be adopted to any criteria other than the one defined in (\[PositiveMaps1\ ])? 

 For this purpose we foremost show how to measure a spectrum of the matrix $ \Theta(\varrho)$, where $ \Theta: 
 \mathcal{B}(\mathbb{C}^{m})\rightarrow\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{C}^{m})$ is an arbitrary linear, hermiticity - preserving map and $ \varrho$ is a given density operator act on $ \mathbb{C}^{m}$, with the aid of only $ m$ parameters estimated alternatively of $ m^{2}-1$. For bipartite $ \varrho$ where $ m = d^{2}$ this gives $ d^{2}$ instead of $ d^{4}-1$. This overture is consistent with previous results [ @Grassl; @Leifer; @Brun ] where arbitrary
 of $\tilde{X}_{\Lambda}(\varrho)$ can ne measured with help oh the slectrum dstimator [@Estimator], which reeuures tftimation of only $a^{2}$ parametvrs which (beceuse of affinity) are in one to lne eocrespondence wijh the needeg spectrum of (\[[oriciveMaps1\]). Note that for $2{\otimes}2$ systemf (the cpmoosite system jf tej qugptw), similar approaches lead to fhe metiod of detectiom of entanglement measures (confurrence [@Concurrenfe] and entabgleiwnt of formagion [@EoF]) wpchout the sjate reconstruction [@PHPRL].

The disxdvancage of the avovf method is [@Rartervt] that realidstion mf SPA tequires additlon tie niise to the system (we have to put some sontrolleg cncillas, couple the stsrem, atd tven geacd tgek kut). In Reh. [@Carteret] fhe questiob was raised about uhe vcistence of hoiselqsf quantum networks, i.e., those of which tht onlg input data are: (i) unkniwn quantum informatiln represqnted by $\varrho^{{\otimes}m}$ (ii) the controlled measured qubiv dhiem fwpgoduces us the spectrum moments (see Ref. [@Estimwfot]). Pt was shown that for at leaxt omg positive map (trans'ksjtion) $T$ the noiselfss netrork wxists [@Cawterrt]. Such networks for two-qubut concurrenbe abd three-qubit tangpe have alsu begn desogned [@Carteret2].

In the przsent laper we asn a generzu question: do noksekevs networks work only for fpecial meps (fbnctions) or co ther exist fog any positive map test? Ln thg case of a posihive answer to the latter: is it possible to dgsicn d generaj metmod for construsting them? Can it be cdoptea to any cgiteria ovher than thq one defined ln (\[PositiveMeps1\])?

For thys pyrpowe we fkfst show how tp measure a spectrun of the matrix $\Thcta(\vatrgo)$, where $\Theta :
\natycal{B}(\mathbb{C}^{m})\ribhtxrrjw\lavhcal{F}(\kathbb{C}^{m})$ is dn afbigtary uinear, hermltizity-lreserving map and $\vdrrhk$ is a given densiyy operatot acting jn $\mathbb{C}^{m}$, woth the help of onpy $m$ 'aramevers extiiated instead of $m^{2}-1$. For bipartife $\varrho$ whcre $m=d^{2}$ this gyves $d^{2}$ instead oy $d^{4}-1$. This approach is consistent with pretious results [@Grassl; @Lgifer; @Brun] where arbijravy
of $\tilde{X}_{\Lambda}(\varrho)$ can be measured with help spectrum [@Estimator], which estimation of only affinity) in one to correspondence with the spectrum of (\[PositiveMaps1\]). Note that for systems (the composite system of two qubits), similar approaches lead to the method detection of entanglement measures (concurrence [@Concurrence] and entanglement of formation [@EoF]) without the reconstruction The of above method is [@Carteret] that realization of SPA requires addition the noise to the system (we to put some controlled ancillas, couple the system, then trace them out). Ref. [@Carteret] the question was about existence of quantum i.e., of which the input data are: (i) unknown quantum information represented by $\varrho^{{\otimes}m}$ (ii) the controlled measured qubit which reproduces the spectrum Ref. [@Estimator]). was that at least one (transposition) $T$ the noiseless network exists for two-qubit concurrence and three-qubit tangle have also designed [@Carteret2]. the present paper we ask a question: do noiseless networks work only for special (functions) or do they exist for any positive map test? In the case of a to the latter: is possible to design general for them? it be to any criteria other than the one defined in (\[PositiveMaps1\])? For purpose we first show how to measure a spectrum of $\Theta(\varrho)$, $\Theta : \mathcal{B}(\mathbb{C}^{m})\rightarrow\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{C}^{m})$ an arbitrary linear, hermiticity-preserving and is a given density on with only parameters instead of $m^{2}-1$. For $\varrho$ where $m=d^{2}$ this gives instead of $d^{4}-1$. This results [@Grassl; @Leifer; @Brun] where arbitrary
 of $\tilde{X}_{\Lambda}(\varrho)$ can be Measured wiTh helP of The SpEctrUm esTimator [@EstimatOR], whiCh requires estimation of Only $d^{2}$ PaRAmetERs Which (Because OF aFFIniTy) ArE in OnE To One coRreSpondenCe with the nEedEd Spectrum of (\[PoSItIveMaps1\]). NotE thAt for $2{\otimes}2$ sYstEms (the CoMpoSIte sySteM of twO qubitS), SimilaR approachEs LEad to tHE method OF DeTectIon of entanglement MEaSUres (concurrencE [@ConcuRrENcE] ANd eNtaNglement of FoRmatiON [@EoF]) witHOuT THE stATe reconstructIon [@PHPRL].

The DIsaDvantaGe Of tHE above MethoD iS [@carTeret] that reAlizAtion of SPa requiREs additIOn the noIse to tHe sYstEm (we HAvE tO puT sOMe cONtRolLEd aNcillas, cOuPlE the sYsteM, AND Then TraCe thEm out). in Ref. [@Carteret] The QuesTIon Was raIsed aBout ThE exisTence oF noisElEss quantum netwoRks, i.E., those of wHicH tHe oNlY inpuT Data arE: (i) uNknOwn quanTum infoRMatIoN REPrEsented by $\varrho^{{\otiMeS}M}$ (Ii) The contrOlled mEAsUrED qubit whIcH reProdUCEs us tHe spECtRum momenTs (see REF. [@EStImator]). IT wAs showN tHat For At leaST one PositiVe map (traNsposITion) $T$ the noiselESs network exisTS [@CARTeREt]. SuCh nEtworks for tWo-quBIt coNcurREnCe aND threE-qubiT tANgLE have also been designEd [@carterEt2].

In tHe present papeR we ask a genERAL questioN: do nOIsELess networks woRk onlY for speciaL Maps (funcTions) Or do they Exist for aNY Positive Map TesT? In The CASe Of a positive anSWEr to ThE latter: Is iT possibLe tO deSigN a gEnEral methoD for consTrUcTiNg TheM? Can iT Be adopteD tO anY cRitEria oTHer thaN the oNe deFiNeD In (\[POsitivemApS1\])?

fOr thIs PuRposE we FiRst shOw hoW To mEasure a Spectrum oF thE MatrIx $\thEta(\varrHo)$, where $\Theta :
\mAtHcal{B}(\mathbB{C}^{M})\riGhtarrOW\Mathcal{B}(\Mathbb{C}^{m})$ is an arbitrary liNEar, hermItiCity-pReseRving map aNd $\vArrho$ iS a gIVen denSity opEratoR aCtiNG On $\matHBB{C}^{M}$, wiTh The help of oNLY $m$ pArameTeRs esTimated Instead of $m^{2}-1$. For biparTIte $\Varrho$ where $m=d^{2}$ ThiS givES $D^{2}$ iNstEAd OF $d^{4}-1$. THiS AppROAch is consistent With previoUs REsUlts [@Grassl; @lEifEr; @brun] wheRe arbitRary
 of $\tilde{X}_{\Lambda}(\ varrho)$ c an be  me asu re d wi th h elp of the spe c trum  estimator [@Estimator ], wh ic h  req u ir es es timatio n  o f onl y$d ^{2 }$ pa ramet ers  which(because o f a ff inity) are i n  o ne to onecor respondencewit h thene ede d  spec tru m of(\[Pos i tiveMa ps1\]). N ot e  thatf or $2{\ o t im es}2 $ systems (the co m po s ite system oftwo qu bi t s) , sim ila r approach es  lead to them et h o d  of detection ofentanglemen t  me asures  ( con c urrenc e [@C on c urr ence] and e ntan glement o f form a tion [@ E oF]) wi thoutthe  st ater ec on str uc t ion [@ PHP R L]. 

The di sa dv antag e of t h e  abo vemeth od is  [@Carteret]tha t re a liz ation  of S PA r eq uires  addit ion t he  noise to the s yste m (we hav e t oput  s ome c o ntroll edanc illas,couplet hesy s t e m,  and then trace th em o ut ). In Re f. [@C a rt er e t] the q ue sti on w a s  rais ed a b ou t the ex istenc e  o fnoisele ss  quant um  ne two rks,i .e.,  those  of whic h the only input dat a  are: (i) unk n ow n qu a ntum  in formation r epre s ente d by $\ var r ho^{{ \otim es } m} $  (ii) the controlle dmeasur ed qu bit which rep roduces us t h e spectr um m o me n ts (see Ref. [ @Esti mator]). I t  was sho wn th at for a t least o n e  positiv e m ap(tr ans p o si tion) $T$ the n oise le ss netw ork  exists  [@ Car ter et] .Such netw orks for  t wo -q ub itconcu r rence an dthr ee -qu bit t a ngle h ave a lsobe en des igned [ @ Ca r t eret 2] .
Inthe  p resen t pa p erwe aska general  qu e stio n:  d o noise less networks  w ork only f or  sp ecialm a ps (func tions) or do they exist for any  po sitiv e ma p test? I n t he cas e o f  a pos itiveanswe rtot h e lat t e r:  is  i t possible t o d esign  a  gen eral me thod for construct i ngthem? Can itbeadop t e dtoa ny cri te r iao t her than the on e definedin (\ [PositiveM a ps1 \] )?

For  this p urpos e  we fir st show h ow to mea su re a s pec trum of th e matrix  $\Theta( \ varrh o )$ , whe re$\Thet a:
\ mathc al{B}( \ mat hbb{C }^{m}) \r ightar row\m at hcal{B}( \mathbb{C}^{m})$ is anarbitr ary l ine ar, hermi tic i ty- preservin g ma p and $\va rrh o$is agiv e n den sity op era t or ac ting on $\math b b{ C}^ { m }$ , with theh e l p o f onl y $ m $ para mete rs estimated inst e ad of $m^{2}-1 $. F o r  bi par t ite$\ varrho$ where$m= d^ { 2 }$ thisgi ves $d^{2}$  instead  o f  $d^{ 4}-1$.  Thisapproac h is consis tent  wi th previo usre s ults [@ Gr as s l; @Le ifer ;@Brun]  where arbi t r ary
 of_$\tilde{X}_{\Lambda}(\varrho)$ can_be measured with help_of the_spectrum_estimator [@Estimator],_which_requires estimation of_only $d^{2}$ parameters_which (because of affinity)_are in one_to_one correspondence with the needed spectrum of (\[PositiveMaps1\]). Note that for $2{\otimes}2$ systems (the_composite_system of_two_qubits),_similar approaches lead to the_method of detection of entanglement_measures (concurrence_[@Concurrence] and entanglement of formation [@EoF]) without the_state_reconstruction [@PHPRL].

The disadvantage_of the above method is [@Carteret] that realization of_SPA requires addition the noise to_the system (we_have_to_put some controlled ancillas,_couple the system, and then trace_them out). In Ref. [@Carteret] the_question was raised about the existence of_noiseless quantum networks, i.e., those of_which the only input data_are: (i)_unknown quantum information represented by_$\varrho^{{\otimes}m}$ (ii) the_controlled measured_qubit which reproduces_us the spectrum moments (see Ref._[@Estimator]). It was_shown that for at least one_positive_map (transposition) $T$_the_noiseless_network exists_[@Carteret]. Such networks_for_two-qubit concurrence_and_three-qubit tangle have also been designed_[@Carteret2].

In_the present paper we ask a general_question: do noiseless networks_work_only for special maps_(functions) or do they exist_for any positive map test? In_the case_of a_positive answer to the latter: is it possible to design a_general method for constructing them? Can_it be adopted to_any criteria_other_than the one_defined_in (\[PositiveMaps1\])?

For_this purpose we first show how to_measure a_spectrum of the matrix $\Theta(\varrho)$, where_$\Theta :
\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{C}^{m})\rightarrow\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{C}^{m})$ is an_arbitrary_linear, hermiticity-preserving map and $\varrho$ is_a given density operator acting on_$\mathbb{C}^{m}$, with the help of_only_$m$_parameters estimated instead of $m^{2}-1$._For bipartite $\varrho$ where $m=d^{2}$ this_gives $d^{2}$ instead_of $d^{4}-1$. This approach is consistent with_previous_results [@Grassl; @Leifer; @Brun] where arbitrary