s} = \sigma_1^{(\beta )}(m)\frac{{\zeta '}}{\zeta }(0) = \sigma_1^{(\beta )}(m)\log (2\pi ),$$ and for the leading term $${M_1} = \mathop {\operatorname{res} }\limits_{s = 1} \sigma_{1 - s/\beta }^{(\beta )}(m)\frac{{\zeta '}}{\zeta }(s)\frac{{{x^s}}}{s} = \sigma_{1 - 1/\beta }^{(\beta )}(m)x.$$ The fluctuaring term coming from the non-trivial zeros yields $${M_\rho } = \sum_\rho  {\mathop {\operatorname{res} }\limits_{s = \rho } \sigma_{1 - s/\beta }^{(\beta )}(m)\frac{{\zeta '}}{\zeta }(s)\frac{{{x^s}}}{s}}  = \sum_\rho  {\sigma_{1 - \rho /\beta }^{(\beta )}(m)\frac{{{x^\rho }}}{\rho }},$$ by the use of the logarithmic derivative of the Hadamdard product of the Riemann zeta-function, and finally for the trivial zeros $${M_{ - 2k}} = \sum_{k = 1}^\infty  {\mathop {\operatorname{res} }\limits_{s =  - 2k} \sigma_{1 - s/\beta }^{(\beta )}(m)\frac{{\zeta '}}{\zeta }(s)\frac{{{x^s}}}{s}}  = \sum_{k = 1}^\infty  {\sigma_{1 + 2k/\beta }^{(\beta )}(m)\frac{{{x^{ - 2k}}}}{{ - 2k}}}.$$ Since $|\sigma  \pm i{T_1}| \geqslant T$, we see, by our choice of $T_1$, that $$\begin{aligned}
  \int_{ - 1 \pm i{T_1}}^{{\sigma _0} \pm i{T_1}} {\sigma_{1 - s/\beta }^{(\beta )}(m)\frac{{\zeta '}}{\zeta }(s)\frac{{{x^s}}}{s}ds}  &\ll \frac{{{{\log }^2}T}}{T} \bigg(\int_{ - 1}^{{\min(\beta,\sigma_0)}} \left(\frac{x}{m}\right)^{\sigma} d\sigma  + \int_{\min
s } = \sigma_1^{(\beta) } (m)\frac{{\zeta' } } { \zeta } (0) = \sigma_1^{(\beta) } (m)\log (2\pi), $ $ and for the leading term $ $ { M_1 } = \mathop { \operatorname{res } } \limits_{s = 1 } \sigma_{1 - s/\beta } ^{(\beta) } (m)\frac{{\zeta' } } { \zeta } (s)\frac{{{x^s}}}{s } = \sigma_{1 - 1/\beta } ^{(\beta) } (m)x.$$ The fluctuaring term coming from the non - fiddling zero yields $ $ { M_\rho } = \sum_\rho   { \mathop { \operatorname{res } } \limits_{s = \rho } \sigma_{1 - s/\beta } ^{(\beta) } (m)\frac{{\zeta' } } { \zeta } (s)\frac{{{x^s}}}{s } }   = \sum_\rho   { \sigma_{1 - \rho /\beta } ^{(\beta) } (m)\frac{{{x^\rho } } } { \rho } }, $ $ by the use of the logarithmic derivative of the Hadamdard intersection of the Riemann zeta - function, and finally for the superficial zero $ $ { M _ { - 2k } } = \sum_{k = 1}^\infty   { \mathop { \operatorname{res } } \limits_{s =   - 2k } \sigma_{1 - s/\beta } ^{(\beta) } (m)\frac{{\zeta' } } { \zeta } (s)\frac{{{x^s}}}{s } }   = \sum_{k = 1}^\infty   { \sigma_{1 + 2k/\beta } ^{(\beta) } (m)\frac{{{x^ { - 2k } } } } { { - 2k}}}.$$ Since $ |\sigma   \pm i{T_1}| \geqslant T$, we see, by our option of $ T_1 $, that $ $ \begin{aligned } 
   \int _ { - 1 \pm i{T_1}}^{{\sigma _ 0 } \pm i{T_1 } } { \sigma_{1 - s/\beta } ^{(\beta) } (m)\frac{{\zeta' } } { \zeta } (s)\frac{{{x^s}}}{s}ds }   & \ll \frac{{{{\log } ^2}T}}{T } \bigg(\int _ { - 1}^{{\min(\beta,\sigma_0) } } \left(\frac{x}{m}\right)^{\sigma } d\sigma   + \int_{\min
s} = \digma_1^{(\beta )}(m)\frac{{\zeta '}}{\zeta }(0) = \sigma_1^{(\beta )}(m)\log (2\pi ),$$ end for the leaaing term $${M_1} = \mathop {\operatoriame{ees} }\lumits_{s = 1} \sigma_{1 - s/\beta }^{(\ceta )}(m)\frab{{\zeta '}}{\zetq }(s)\fcac{{{x^s}}}{s} = \sigma_{1 - 1/\bxfa }^{(\beta )}(m)x.$$ Ths fluetnaring term comlng from tha non-trivial zarus yields $${M_\rho } = \sum_\rho  {\mathop {\operaeorname{ted} }\limits_{s = \rho } \sibia_{1 - a/\beta }^{(\beta )}(m)\frac{{\zeta '}}{\zeta }(s)\frac{{{x^s}}}{s}}  = \sum_\rio  {\sigma_{1 - \rho /\neta }^{(\beta )}(m)\frac{{{x^\rho }}}{\rho }},$$ bj thf use of the logarlthmic dericatidw of the Hadxmdard product of the Tiemann zeta-function, and finally for che trivial zwrod $${M_{ - 2k}} = \sum_{k = 1}^\infny  {\mathop {\opcgatornake{res} }\lomits_{s =  - 2k} \sinma_{1 - v/\bera }^{(\beta )}(m)\frac{{\zeta '}}{\zete }(s)\frac{{{x^s}}}{s}}  = \sum_{k = 1}^\igfty  {\sigka_{1 + 2k/\beta }^{(\beta )}(m)\frax{{{x^{ - 2k}}}}{{ - 2n}}}.$$ Sitce $|\rugmx  \km m{T_1}| \feqslajt V$, we see, by our choice of $T_1$, that $$\begin{alibnqe}
  \int_{ - 1 \pm i{F_1}}^{{\sigma _0} \[m i{T_1}} {\sigma_{1 - s/\beta }^{(\beta )}(m)\frac{{\zeta '}}{\zeta }(v)\frzc{{{x^s}}}{s}ds}  &\ll \frac{{{{\log }^2}T}}{T} \vigg(\int_{ - 1}^{{\min(\beta,\sigma_0)}} \left(\frac{v}{m}\right)^{\sigma} d\sigma  + \int_{\min
s} = \sigma_1^{(\beta )}(m)\frac{{\zeta '}}{\zeta }(0) = (2\pi and for leading term $${M_1} 1} - s/\beta }^{(\beta '}}{\zeta }(s)\frac{{{x^s}}}{s} = - 1/\beta }^{(\beta )}(m)x.$$ The fluctuaring coming from the non-trivial zeros yields $${M_\rho } = \sum_\rho {\mathop {\operatorname{res} }\limits_{s \rho } \sigma_{1 - s/\beta }^{(\beta )}(m)\frac{{\zeta '}}{\zeta }(s)\frac{{{x^s}}}{s}} = \sum_\rho {\sigma_{1 - /\beta )}(m)\frac{{{x^\rho }},$$ the use of the logarithmic derivative of the Hadamdard product of the Riemann zeta-function, and finally the trivial zeros $${M_{ - 2k}} = \sum_{k 1}^\infty {\mathop {\operatorname{res} }\limits_{s - 2k} \sigma_{1 - s/\beta )}(m)\frac{{\zeta }(s)\frac{{{x^s}}}{s}} = = {\sigma_{1 2k/\beta }^{(\beta )}(m)\frac{{{x^{ 2k}}}}{{ - 2k}}}.$$ Since $|\sigma \pm i{T_1}| \geqslant T$, we see, by our choice of $T_1$, that \int_{ - i{T_1}}^{{\sigma _0} i{T_1}} - }^{(\beta )}(m)\frac{{\zeta '}}{\zeta \frac{{{{\log }^2}T}}{T} \bigg(\int_{ - 1}^{{\min(\beta,\sigma_0)}} \left(\frac{x}{m}\right)^{\sigma}
s} = \sigma_1^{(\beta )}(m)\frac{{\zeta '}}{\zeta }(0) = \siGma_1^{(\beta )}(m)\loG (2\pi ),$$ anD foR thE lEadiNg teRm $${M_1} = \mathop {\operaTOrnaMe{res} }\limits_{s = 1} \sigma_{1 - s/\beta }^{(\Beta )}(m)\FrAC{{\zetA '}}{\ZeTa }(s)\frAc{{{x^s}}}{s} = \siGMa_{1 - 1/\BETa }^{(\bEtA )}(m)X.$$ ThE fLUcTuariNg tErm comiNg from the nOn-tRiVial zeros yieLDs $${m_\rho } = \sum_\rho  {\MatHop {\operatornAme{Res} }\limItS_{s = \rHO } \sigmA_{1 - s/\bEta }^{(\beTa )}(m)\fraC{{\Zeta '}}{\zeTa }(s)\frac{{{x^s}}}{S}}  = \sUM_\rho  {\siGMa_{1 - \rho /\beTA }^{(\BeTa )}(m)\fRac{{{x^\rho }}}{\rho }},$$ by the usE Of THe logarithmic dErivatIvE Of THE HaDamDard producT oF the RIEmann zeTA-fUNCTioN, And finally for The trivial zERos $${m_{ - 2k}} = \sum_{k = 1}^\InFty  {\MAthop {\oPeratOrNAme{Res} }\limits_{s =  - 2k} \SigmA_{1 - s/\beta }^{(\betA )}(m)\frac{{\ZEta '}}{\zeta }(S)\Frac{{{x^s}}}{s}}  = \Sum_{k = 1}^\inFty  {\SigMa_{1 + 2k/\bETa }^{(\BeTa )}(m)\FrAC{{{x^{ - 2k}}}}{{ - 2K}}}.$$ siNce $|\SIgmA  \pm i{T_1}| \geqSlAnT T$, we sEe, by OUR CHoicE of $t_1$, thaT $$\begiN{aligned}
  \int_{ - 1 \pm I{T_1}}^{{\sIgma _0} \PM i{T_1}} {\Sigma_{1 - S/\beta }^{(\Beta )}(M)\fRac{{\zeTa '}}{\zeta }(S)\frac{{{X^s}}}{S}ds}  &\ll \frac{{{{\log }^2}T}}{T} \bIgg(\iNt_{ - 1}^{{\min(\beta,\SigMa_0)}} \LefT(\fRac{x}{m}\RIght)^{\siGma} D\siGma  + \int_{\mIn
s} = \sigma_1^{(\beta )}(m )\frac{{\z eta ' }}{ \ze ta  }(0 ) =\sigma_1^{(\be t a )} (m)\log (2\pi ),$$ and  forth e  lea d in g ter m $${M_ 1 }= \ma th op  {\ op e ra torna me{ res} }\ limits_{s= 1 }\sigma_{1 -s /\ beta }^{(\ bet a )}(m)\frac {{\ zeta ' }} {\z e ta }( s)\ frac{ {{x^s} } }{s} =  \sigma_{ 1-  1/\be t a }^{(\ b e ta  )}( m)x.$$ The fluctu a ri n g term comingfrom t he no n - tri via l zeros yi el ds $$ { M_\rho}  = \ s um_ \ rho  {\mathop  {\operator n ame {res}}\ lim i ts_{s= \rh o}  \s igma_{1 - s /\be ta }^{(\b eta )} ( m)\frac { {\zeta'}}{\z eta  }( s)\f r ac {{ {x^ s} } }{s } } =\ sum _\rho  { \s ig ma_{1  - \ r h o /\be ta}^{( \beta  )}(m)\frac{{ {x^ \rho }}} {\rho  }},$ $ by  t he us e of t he lo ga rithmic derivat iveof the Ha dam da rdpr oduct of the  Ri ema nn zeta -functi o n,an d f in ally for the trivi al z er os $${M_ { - 2k } }=\ sum_{k =  1 }^\ inft y  {\ma thop {\ operator name{r e s}  } \limits _{ s =  -  2 k}\si gma_{ 1  - s /\beta  }^{(\be ta )} ( m)\frac{{\zeta '}}{\zeta }(s ) \f r a c{ { {x^s }}} {s}}  = \su m_{k = 1} ^\in f ty   { \ sigma _{1 +  2 k /\ b eta }^{(\beta )}(m) \f rac{{{ x^{ -  2k}}}}{{ - 2 k}}}.$$ Si n c e  $|\sigm a  \ p mi {T_1}| \geqsla nt T$ , we see,b y our ch oiceof $T_1$ , that $$ \ b egin{ali gne d}  \ int _ {  -  1 \pm i{T_1} } ^ {{\s ig ma _0}\pm  i{T_1} } { \si gma _{1  -  s/\beta}^{(\bet a)} (m )\ fra c{{\z e ta '}}{\ ze ta}( s)\ frac{ { {x^s}} }{s}d s} &\ ll \fr ac{{{{\ l og } ^2}T }} {T } \b igg (\ int_{  - 1 } ^{{ \min(\b eta,\sigm a_0 ) }} \ le ft (\frac{ x}{m}\right)^ {\ sigma} d\s ig ma + \in t _ {\min
s} =_\sigma_1^{(\beta )}(m)\frac{{\zeta_'}}{\zeta }(0) = \sigma_1^{(\beta_)}(m)\log (2\pi_),$$_and for_the_leading term $${M_1}_= \mathop {\operatorname{res}_}\limits_{s = 1} \sigma_{1_- s/\beta }^{(\beta_)}(m)\frac{{\zeta_'}}{\zeta }(s)\frac{{{x^s}}}{s} = \sigma_{1 - 1/\beta }^{(\beta )}(m)x.$$ The fluctuaring term coming from the_non-trivial_zeros yields_$${M_\rho_}_= \sum_\rho  {\mathop {\operatorname{res}_}\limits_{s = \rho } \sigma_{1_- s/\beta_}^{(\beta )}(m)\frac{{\zeta '}}{\zeta }(s)\frac{{{x^s}}}{s}}  = \sum_\rho _{\sigma_{1_- \rho /\beta_}^{(\beta )}(m)\frac{{{x^\rho }}}{\rho }},$$ by the use of the_logarithmic derivative of the Hadamdard product_of the Riemann_zeta-function,_and_finally for the trivial_zeros $${M_{ - 2k}} = \sum_{k_= 1}^\infty  {\mathop {\operatorname{res} }\limits_{s_=  - 2k} \sigma_{1 - s/\beta_}^{(\beta )}(m)\frac{{\zeta '}}{\zeta }(s)\frac{{{x^s}}}{s}}  =_\sum_{k = 1}^\infty  {\sigma_{1_+ 2k/\beta_}^{(\beta )}(m)\frac{{{x^{ - 2k}}}}{{ -_2k}}}.$$ Since $|\sigma_ \pm_i{T_1}| \geqslant T$,_we see, by our choice of_$T_1$, that $$\begin{aligned}
_ \int_{ - 1 \pm i{T_1}}^{{\sigma__0}_\pm i{T_1}} {\sigma_{1_-_s/\beta_}^{(\beta )}(m)\frac{{\zeta_'}}{\zeta }(s)\frac{{{x^s}}}{s}ds} _&\ll_\frac{{{{\log }^2}T}}{T}_\bigg(\int_{_- 1}^{{\min(\beta,\sigma_0)}} \left(\frac{x}{m}\right)^{\sigma} d\sigma  +_\int_{\min