-100Myr. This effect is hardly significant compared to the error bars, however.

In addition, we remind the reader that the results presented in Figs. \[fig:MF\]-\[fig:MFblur\] assume a [*weak tidal field impact*]{} (i.e. $r_h/r_t \lesssim 0.01$). The impact of a tidal field upon a population of CFRgs is tightly related to their mass-radius relation [see @par11 for a thorough discussion]. Let us assume that all CFRgs are exposed to the same tidal field (e.g. they are all located in the same region of a given galaxy). If the mean surface density of CFRgs is constant, more massive objects have a lower [*volume*]{} density and are therefore more vulnerable to tidally-induced mass-losses after gas expulsion. If the tidal field is strong enough, a deficit in high-mass clusters then characterizes the end of violent relaxation (see bottom panel of fig. 3 in @par11 and fig. 4 in @par10), and the cluster mass function becomes [*steeper*]{} than the embedded-cluster mass function. In contrast, CFRgs with a given mean [*volume*]{} density all present the same sensitivity to the external tidal field, thereby preventing a distorsion of the cluster mass function shape through mass-dependent tidally-induced mass-losses.

The nature of the CFRg mass-radius relation remains heavily debated. Based on an analysis of the binary population in young star clusters, @mar12 favour a weak mass-radius relation (i.e. close to a constant radius). In contrast, @fal10 infer a constant-surface-density relation based on the SFE – hence the amount of stellar feedback – required to cleanse a CFRg from its residual star-forming gas. Note that their analysis does not explore the impact of a mass-dependent gas-expulsion time-scale or of a tidal field [see section 4.1 in @par11 for a detailed discussion of these points].

We strongly encourage observers to report – without any preconceived idea – how the cluster mass function evolves with time, and to vary the size of the cluster age ranges over which cluster mass functions are integrated. This also requests a careful assessment of the errors affecting the mass function slope and, therefore, a good control of the errors affecting individual cluster mass estimates.

Returning to virial equilibrium:
-100Myr. This effect is hardly significant compared to the mistake stripe, however. 

 In addition, we remind the reader that the solution presented in Figs.   \[fig: MF\]-\[fig: MFblur\ ] assume a [ * decrepit tidal playing field impact * ] { } (i.e. $ r_h / r_t \lesssim 0.01 $). The impingement of a tidal field upon a population of CFRgs is tightly related to their mass - spoke relation [ see @par11 for a thorough discussion ]. Let us wear that all CFRgs are exposed to the same tidal field (e.g. they are all locate in the same region of a given galax). If the mean surface concentration of CFRgs is constant, more massive object have a lower [ * volume * ] { } density and are therefore more vulnerable to tidally - induce mass - losses after gas expulsion. If the tidal field is solid enough, a deficit in gamey - mass clusters then characterizes the end of violent relaxation (see bottom panel of fig.   3 in @par11 and fig.   4 in @par10), and the bunch batch function become [ * steep * ] { } than the embedded - cluster mass affair. In contrast, CFRgs with a given mean [ * volume * ] { } density all portray the same sensitivity to the external tidal field, thereby preventing a distorsion of the cluster mass function condition through mass - dependent tidally - induced mass - losses. 

 The nature of the CFRg mass - spoke relation back remains heavily debated. Based on an psychoanalysis of the binary population in young star clusters, @mar12 favour a weak mass - radius relation (i.e. close to a ceaseless radius). In line, @fal10 infer a constant - surface - density relation establish on the SFE – hence the sum of stellar feedback – want to cleanse a CFRg from its residual star - forming gas. Note that their analysis does not research the impact of a mass - dependent flatulence - expulsion time - scale or of a tidal field [ see part 4.1 in @par11 for a detailed discussion of these points ]. 

 We strongly promote observers to report – without any preconceived idea – how the cluster mass function evolves with time, and to deviate the size of the cluster age ranges over which cluster mass functions are integrate. This besides requests a careful assessment of the errors affecting the mass function slope and, therefore, a full control of the errors affecting individual bunch mass estimate. 

 Returning to virial equilibrium:
-100Myr. This effect is hardly slgnificant compatee to tie errod bars, huwever.

In addition, we remind vhe eeadee that the results prerented in Figs. \[fig:NF\]-\[fij:MFblur\] assume a [*weak tidal fispd ik'act*]{} (i.e. $r_h/r_t \lexssim 0.01$). The impact of a thdxl field upon a population of CFRgs if tightky related to thgir msfs-raspuw relation [see @par11 for a thorkugh divcussion]. Let is assume that all CFRgs age edposed to the same tidal fiele (e.g. rhey are all located in the same rggion of a given galaxy). If the mdan sbrface densutt ov CFRgs is cinstagt, more masslne objewts havr a lower [*voluke*]{} vensuty and are therefore more vulnerable tj tidally-hnbuced mass-losses aftee tas efpulvion. Uf ghe tmdam fielf ia strong ehough, a defucit in high-mass clisevts then charzcterisef the end of violent relaxation (see botuom pznel of fig. 3 in @par11 and dig. 4 in @par10), and the closter mass function becomes [*steeper*]{} than the embedded-clustes masa fuugbion. Un contrast, CFRgs with a given mean [*volume*]{} densyfy akl present the same sensiyigiyi to the exterval tibzl field, thereby pregenting a diwtorsion jf tne cluster mass function shqpe through iqss-dependent tidalpy-induced mcss-losxes.

Thr nature of the CFRg mars-rasius relatiln remaina heavily debated. Baxeg on an analysis of the bigary popuoatipn in yuung star slusters, @mwr12 faymur a weak mass-radlus rglatiot (i.e. close to a constant radius). In contrast, @fal10 infer a cmnsnant-surfaee-denslty relation bafed on the SFE – hence the xmount of atellar feedback – wequired to cnganse a CFRg hrom its wesieual star-fofoing gas. Note yhat theig cnalysis eoes not explore tme imkadt of a mass-depzudtnr gas-expulsion tioe-ssape ow of a tidal xiela [sdr secgion 4.1 in @pav11 fur a detailed discussion of fhese points].

We strpnnly encoutage obsewvers to repott – without any prtconcemved ivea – hpw jhe cluster mass function evolvss with tlme, and to vary the size of the cluster age ranges over which cluster nass functions arg integrated. This alsp requests a caresul assesvment of the errors qffecting the masx function slope and, fherefmre, a good control of the errors affecting individual cluster mass estimates.

Rerurninj eo virial esuilobriuk:
-100Myr. This effect is hardly significant compared error however. In we remind the in \[fig:MF\]-\[fig:MFblur\] assume a tidal field impact*]{} $r_h/r_t \lesssim 0.01$). The impact of tidal field upon a population of CFRgs is tightly related to their mass-radius [see @par11 for a thorough discussion]. Let us assume that all CFRgs are to same field they are all located in the same region of a given galaxy). If the mean surface of CFRgs is constant, more massive objects have lower [*volume*]{} density and therefore more vulnerable to tidally-induced after expulsion. If tidal is enough, a deficit high-mass clusters then characterizes the end of violent relaxation (see bottom panel of fig. 3 in @par11 fig. 4 and the mass becomes than the embedded-cluster In contrast, CFRgs with a given all present the same sensitivity to the external field, thereby a distorsion of the cluster mass shape through mass-dependent tidally-induced mass-losses. The nature of CFRg mass-radius relation remains heavily debated. Based on an analysis of the binary population in clusters, @mar12 favour a mass-radius relation (i.e. to constant In @fal10 infer constant-surface-density relation based on the SFE – hence the amount of feedback – required to cleanse a CFRg from its residual Note their analysis does explore the impact of mass-dependent time-scale or of a [see 4.1 a discussion these points]. We strongly observers to report – without preconceived idea – how with time, and to vary the size of cluster age ranges over which cluster mass are integrated. This also requests a careful assessment of the errors affecting mass function therefore, a good control of the errors affecting cluster mass estimates. Returning virial equilibrium:
-100Myr. This effect is hardly signIficant comPared To tHe eRrOr baRs, hoWever.

In additioN, We reMind the reader that the reSults PrESentED iN Figs. \[Fig:MF\]-\[fiG:mFBLUr\] aSsUmE a [*wEaK TiDal fiEld Impact*]{} (i.E. $r_h/r_t \lesssIm 0.01$). THe Impact of a tidAL fIeld upon a pOpuLation of CFRgS is TightlY rElaTEd to tHeiR mass-Radius RElatioN [see @par11 foR a THorougH DiscussION]. LEt us Assume that all CFRgS ArE Exposed to the saMe tidaL fIElD (E.G. thEy aRe all locatEd In the SAme regiON oF A GIveN Galaxy). If the meAn surface deNSitY of CFRGs Is cONstant, More mAsSIve Objects have A lowEr [*volume*]{} dEnsity ANd are thERefore mOre vulNerAblE to tIDaLlY-inDuCEd mASs-LosSEs aFter gas eXpUlSion. IF the TIDAL fieLd iS strOng enOugh, a deficit iN hiGh-maSS clUsterS then CharAcTerizEs the eNd of vIoLent relaxation (sEe boTtom panel Of fIg. 3 In @pAr11 And fiG. 4 In @par10), aNd tHe cLuster mAss funcTIon BeCOMEs [*Steeper*]{} than the embeDdED-ClUster masS functIOn. in COntrast, CfRGs wIth a GIVen meAn [*voLUmE*]{} density All preSEnT tHe same sEnSitiviTy To tHe eXternAL tidAl fielD, thereby PreveNTing a distorsioN Of the cluster mASs FUNcTIon sHapE through masS-depENdenT tidALlY-inDUced mAss-loSsES.

THE nature of the CFRg masS-rAdius rElatiOn remains heavIly debated. bASEd on an anAlysIS oF The binary populAtion In young staR Clusters, @Mar12 faVour a weaK mass-radiUS Relation (I.e. cLosE to A coNSTaNt radius). In conTRAst, @fAl10 Infer a cOnsTant-surFacE-deNsiTy rElAtion baseD on the SFe – hEnCe ThE amOunt oF Stellar fEeDbaCk – ReqUired TO cleanSe a CFrg frOm ItS ResIdual stAR-fORMing GaS. NOte tHat ThEir anAlysIS doEs not exPlore the iMpaCT of a MaSs-DependeNt gas-expulsioN tIme-scale or Of A tiDal fieLD [See sectiOn 4.1 in @par11 for a detailed discUSsion of TheSe poiNts].

WE strongly EncOurage ObsERvers tO reporT – withOuT anY PReconCEIvEd iDeA – how the cluSTEr mAss fuNcTion Evolves With time, and to vary tHE siZe of the clusteR agE ranGES oVer WHiCH clUsTEr mASS functions are inTegrated. ThIs ALsO requests a CAreFuL assessMent of tHe errORs affecTing the maSs functioN sLope AND, thErefore, a goOd controL of the errORs affECtIng inDivIdual cLuSteR mass EstimaTEs.

REturnIng to vIrIal equIlibrIuM:
-100Myr. This effect is ha rdly signi fican t c omp ar ed t o th e error bars,h owev er.

In addition, we r emind  t h e re a de r tha t the r e su l t s p re se nte di nFigs.  \[ fig:MF\ ]-\[fig:MF blu r\ ] assume a [ * we ak tidal f iel d impact*]{}  (i .e. $r _h /r_ t  \les ssi m 0.0 1$). T h e impa ct of a t id a l fiel d  upon a p op ulat ion of CFRgs is t i gh t ly related totheirma s s- r a diu s r elation [s ee  @par 1 1 for a th o r o ugh discussion].Let us assu m e t hat al lCFR g s areexpos ed tothe same ti dalfield (e. g. the y  are al l  locate d in t hesam e re g io nofag ive n  g ala x y).  If theme an  surf aced e n s ityofCFRg s isconstant, mor e m assi v e o bject s hav e alo wer [ *volum e*]{}  d ensity and arether efore mor e v ul ner ab le to tidall y-i ndu ced mas s-losse s  af te r g as  expulsion. If the  t i d al  field i s stro n gen o ugh, a d ef ici t in h igh-m assc lu sters th en cha r ac te rizes t he  end o fvio len t rel a xati on (se e bottom  pane l  of fig. 3 in@ par11 and fig .  4 i n@ par1 0),  and the cl uste r  mas s fu n ct ion becom es [* st e ep e r*]{} than the embe dd ed-clu stermass function . In contr a s t , CFRgswith ag iven mean [*vo lume* ]{} densit y  all pre sentthe same  sensitiv i t y to the  ex ter nal  ti d a lfield, thereb y prev en ting adis torsion  of  th e c lus te r mass fu nction s ha pe  t hr oug h mas s -depende nt  ti da lly -indu c ed mas s-los ses. 
Th e  na ture of th e CFRg  m as s-ra diu srelat ionr ema ins hea vily deba ted .  Bas ed  o n an an alysis of the  b inary popu la tio n in y o u ng starclusters, @mar12 favour a weakmas s-rad iusrelation(i. e. clo set o a co nstant  radi us ).I n  cont r a st , @ fa l10 infera con stant -s urfa ce-dens ity relation based onthe SFE – hen cethea m ou nto fs tel la r  fe e d back – required  to cleans ea  C FRg from i t s r es idual s tar-for mingg as. Not e that th eir analy si s do e s  no t explorethe impa ct of a m a ss-de p en dentgas -expul si ontime- scaleo r o f a t idal f ie ld [se e sec ti on 4.1 i n @par11 for a detailed  discu ssion  of  these po int s ].
We stron glyencourageobs erv ers t o r e port– wi t ho uta ny pr econ c eived ide a  –  ho w th e cluster m a s s  fu nctio n e v olveswith  time, and to var y  the size of t he c l u ste r a g e ra ng es over whichclu st e r  mass fu nc tions are i ntegrate d. Thisalso r equest s a car e f ul assess ment  of  the erro rsaf f ectingth em ass fu ncti on  slope  and,t here f o re, a good contr ol of t he er r ors  affe ct ing ind i vidu al cluster  mass estim ates.
Ret urnin g to vi ri al equ ili br ium:
-100Myr. This_effect is_hardly significant compared to_the error_bars,_however.

In addition,_we_remind the reader_that the results_presented in Figs. \[fig:MF\]-\[fig:MFblur\] assume_a [*weak tidal_field_impact*]{} (i.e. $r_h/r_t \lesssim 0.01$). The impact of a tidal field upon a population_of_CFRgs is_tightly_related_to their mass-radius relation [see_@par11 for a thorough discussion]._Let us_assume that all CFRgs are exposed to the_same_tidal field (e.g._they are all located in the same region of_a given galaxy). If the mean_surface density of_CFRgs_is_constant, more massive objects_have a lower [*volume*]{} density and_are therefore more vulnerable to tidally-induced_mass-losses after gas expulsion. If the tidal_field is strong enough, a deficit_in high-mass clusters then characterizes_the end_of violent relaxation (see bottom_panel of fig. 3_in @par11_and fig. 4 in_@par10), and the cluster mass function_becomes [*steeper*]{} than_the embedded-cluster mass function. In contrast,_CFRgs_with a given_mean_[*volume*]{}_density all_present the same_sensitivity_to the_external_tidal field, thereby preventing a distorsion_of_the cluster mass function shape through mass-dependent_tidally-induced mass-losses.

The nature of_the_CFRg mass-radius relation remains_heavily debated. Based on an_analysis of the binary population in_young star_clusters, @mar12_favour a weak mass-radius relation (i.e. close to a constant radius)._In contrast, @fal10 infer a constant-surface-density_relation based on the_SFE –_hence_the amount of_stellar_feedback –_required to cleanse a CFRg from its_residual star-forming_gas. Note that their analysis does_not explore the impact_of_a mass-dependent gas-expulsion time-scale or of_a tidal field [see section 4.1_in @par11 for a detailed_discussion_of_these points].

We strongly encourage observers_to report – without any preconceived_idea – how_the cluster mass function evolves with time,_and_to vary the size of the_cluster_age ranges over which cluster mass_functions_are_integrated. This also requests a_careful assessment of the errors affecting_the mass function slope and, therefore, a good control_of the errors_affecting individual cluster mass estimates.

Returning_to_virial_equilibrium: