{\bolds{\beta}}^*(\cdot)=0\quad \mbox{versus}\quad
\breve{H}_{a} \dvt{\bolds{\beta}}^*(\cdot)\neq0.$$ Then we can perform $\lambda^*_n$ to testing $\breve{H}_{0}$ with transformed regression coefficients ${\bolds{\beta}}^*(\cdot)$ and response $\breve{y}_i=y_i-\mathbf{x}_i^\top{\bolds{\beta}}_0(t,\hat{\theta}_0)$. Note that the local linear estimator of ${\bolds{\beta}}^*(\cdot)$ has no bias under $\breve{H}_0$ and we can avoid the notorious problem of bias estimation.

As mentioned in Fan and Jiang [@FanJia07], a choice of larger bandwidth favors smoother alternatives and a smaller bandwidth tends to detect less smooth alternatives. Thanks to the introduction of the averaged test, the sensitivity of the test to the choice of bandwidth is alleviated due to the introduction of a group of bandwidths. On the other hand, the correlation of $\lambda_n$ between nearby bandwidths are usually quite high and hence in practice one only needs to average the test over a grid of relatively separated bandwidths. Zhang [@Zha03] found that the correlation between $\lambda_n(h)$ and $\lambda_n(ch)$ is quite high for $c=1.3$. As suggested by Fan and Jiang [@FanJia07], here we recommend choosing the grid of three bandwidths $\tilde{b}_n/1.5$, $\tilde{b}_n$ and $\tilde{b}_n\times1.5$ to represent small, medium and large bandwidths and average the test over the latter grid. Here $\tilde{b}_n=b_n^*\times n^{-1/45}$ and $b_n^*$ is the optimal bandwidth for nonparametric curve estimation.

The robust wild bootstrap {#secwildboots}
-------------------------

A direct implementation of the asymptotic distribution in Theorem \[thmnewtest\] may not perform satisfactorily in practice due to the following two reasons. First, the convergence rate of test statistic equals $\mathrm{O}(n^{-1/9})$ when bandwidth $b_n$ is chosen optimally. The rate is quite slow and hence the asymptotic approximation may not be accurate for moderate samples. Second, as we can see from the proof of Lemma \[lemasy5\] in Section \[secproof
{ \bolds{\beta}}^*(\cdot)=0\quad \mbox{versus}\quad 
 \breve{H}_{a } \dvt{\bolds{\beta}}^*(\cdot)\neq0.$$ Then we can perform $ \lambda^*_n$ to testing $ \breve{H}_{0}$ with transformed regression coefficient $ { \bolds{\beta}}^*(\cdot)$ and response $ \breve{y}_i = y_i-\mathbf{x}_i^\top{\bolds{\beta}}_0(t,\hat{\theta}_0)$. notice that the local analogue estimator of $ { \bolds{\beta}}^*(\cdot)$ has no bias under $ \breve{H}_0 $ and we can keep off the notorious problem of diagonal estimation. 

 As mentioned in Fan and Jiang [ @FanJia07 ], a choice of bigger bandwidth favors smoother alternatives and a little bandwidth tends to detect less smooth alternatives. Thanks to the introduction of the averaged test, the sensitivity of the trial to the choice of bandwidth is alleviated due to the introduction of a group of bandwidth. On the other hand, the correlation coefficient of $ \lambda_n$ between nearby bandwidths are normally quite high and hence in practice one only needs to average the test over a power system of relatively separated bandwidths. Zhang [ @Zha03 ] found that the correlation between $ \lambda_n(h)$ and $ \lambda_n(ch)$ is quite high for $ c=1.3$. As suggested by Fan and Jiang [ @FanJia07 ], here we commend choose the grid of three bandwidths $ \tilde{b}_n/1.5 $, $ \tilde{b}_n$ and $ \tilde{b}_n\times1.5 $ to represent small, medium and large bandwidths and average the test over the latter grid. Here $ \tilde{b}_n = b_n^*\times n^{-1/45}$ and $ b_n^*$ is the optimum bandwidth for nonparametric curvature estimation. 

 The full-bodied raving mad bootstrap { # secwildboots } 
 ------------------------- 

 A direct implementation of the asymptotic distribution in Theorem \[thmnewtest\ ] may not perform satisfactorily in exercise due to the following two reason. First, the convergence pace of test statistic equals $ \mathrm{O}(n^{-1/9})$ when bandwidth $ b_n$ is chosen optimally. The rate is quite slow and hence the asymptotic estimate may not be accurate for moderate samples. Second, as we can see from the proof of Lemma \[lemasy5\ ] in Section \[secproof
{\bolfs{\beta}}^*(\cdot)=0\quad \mbox{versur}\quad
\breve{H}_{a} \dvj{\bilds{\beva}}^*(\cdot)\nsq0.$$ Then de can perform $\lambda^*_n$ to tedtung $\beeve{H}_{0}$ with transformed regressiln coeffucieits ${\bolds{\beta}}^*(\cdov)$ and response $\nreve{v}_i=b_i-\mathbf{x}_i^\top{\bokds{\beta}}_0(t,\had{\theta}_0)$. Note thdt tke local linear estimator of ${\bolds{\beea}}^*(\cdot)$ nad no bias undet $\brene{R}_0$ ans we can avoid the notorious problsm of bpas estimation.

As kentioned in Fan and Jiang [@FanUia07], a choice of lagger bandwieth sqvors smoothdr alternauires and a sjaller bandwidth tends to detecg lesx smooth aotwrnwjives. Thanks to tre introductlpn of dhe avetaged test, the seisituvity of the test to vhe choice of bandwiqth is alneriated due to the inteoeuctimn ox a eeouo or uanswidthd. Oi the other hand, the cirrelation of $\lambds_n$ vetween nearbg bandriqths are usually quite high and hence it pdactice one only needs ro average the test oger a griq of relatively separated bandwidths. Zhang [@Zha03] fognd tiag tkc zirgelation between $\lambda_n(h)$ and $\lambda_n(ch)$ is quyfe hpgh for $c=1.3$. As suggcsted by Fan and Joajg [@SanJia07], here wg recommens choosing the grif of thtee babdwidths $\uilde{n}_n/1.5$, $\tilde{b}_n$ and $\tilde{b}_n\times1.5$ to represenn smqll, medium and larye bandwidthr anc avetage the test over the uattsr grid. Herf $\tilde{b}_n=g_v^*\times n^{-1/45}$ and $b_n^*$ ks nhe mptimal bandwidth for nonpwrametric curre estimxtiom.

The rjbust wild bootstrap {#secwildboots}
-------------------------

A direet im[lementatiln of the asymptotic distribution in Theorem \[jhmtewnest\] may uot pevform satisfactjrily in practnce due co the following two reesons. First, ehe convergenwg rate of tesv statistyc ewualw $\mathro{U}(n^{-1/9})$ when bandwicth $b_n$ is chosen oprimally. The rate ix qoife slow and henet tye asymptotic alpruxiianioi may tot be accurdte wor koderxte samkjew. Secpnd, as we can see frmm tge proof of Lemma \[keiasy5\] in Wection \[fecproof
{\bolds{\beta}}^*(\cdot)=0\quad \mbox{versus}\quad \breve{H}_{a} \dvt{\bolds{\beta}}^*(\cdot)\neq0.$$ Then we can to $\breve{H}_{0}$ with regression coefficients ${\bolds{\beta}}^*(\cdot)$ the linear estimator of has no bias $\breve{H}_0$ and we can avoid the problem of bias estimation. As mentioned in Fan and Jiang [@FanJia07], a choice larger bandwidth favors smoother alternatives and a smaller bandwidth tends to detect less alternatives. to introduction the averaged test, the sensitivity of the test to the choice of bandwidth is alleviated due the introduction of a group of bandwidths. On other hand, the correlation $\lambda_n$ between nearby bandwidths are quite and hence practice only to average the over a grid of relatively separated bandwidths. Zhang [@Zha03] found that the correlation between $\lambda_n(h)$ and $\lambda_n(ch)$ quite high As suggested Fan Jiang here we recommend grid of three bandwidths $\tilde{b}_n/1.5$, $\tilde{b}_n$ represent small, medium and large bandwidths and average test over latter grid. Here $\tilde{b}_n=b_n^*\times n^{-1/45}$ and is the optimal bandwidth for nonparametric curve estimation. robust wild bootstrap {#secwildboots} ------------------------- A direct implementation of the asymptotic distribution in Theorem \[thmnewtest\] perform satisfactorily in practice to the following reasons. the rate test statistic $\mathrm{O}(n^{-1/9})$ when bandwidth $b_n$ is chosen optimally. The rate is quite and hence the asymptotic approximation may not be accurate for Second, we can see the proof of Lemma in \[secproof
{\bolds{\beta}}^*(\cdot)=0\quad \mbox{versUs}\quad
\brevE{H}_{a} \dvT{\boLds{\BeTa}}^*(\cdOt)\neQ0.$$ Then we can perfORm $\laMbda^*_n$ to testing $\breve{H}_{0}$ wiTh traNsFOrmeD ReGressIon coefFIcIENts ${\BoLdS{\beTa}}^*(\CDoT)$ and rEspOnse $\breVe{y}_i=y_i-\mathBf{x}_I^\tOp{\bolds{\beta}}_0(t,\HAt{\Theta}_0)$. Note tHat The local lineAr eStimatOr Of ${\bOLds{\beTa}}^*(\cDot)$ haS no biaS Under $\bReve{H}_0$ and wE cAN avoid THe notorIOUs ProbLem of bias estimatiON.

AS Mentioned in Fan And JiaNg [@fAnjIA07], a cHoiCe of larger BaNdwidTH favors SMoOTHEr aLTernatives and A smaller banDWidTh tendS tO deTEct lesS smooTh ALteRnatives. ThaNks tO the introDuctioN Of the avERaged teSt, the sEnsItiVity OF tHe TesT tO The CHoIce OF baNdwidth iS aLlEviatEd duE TO THe inTroDuctIon of A group of bandwIdtHs. On THe oTher hAnd, thE corReLatioN of $\lamBda_n$ bEtWeen nearby bandwIdthS are usualLy qUiTe hIgH and hENce in pRacTicE one onlY needs tO AveRaGE THe Test over a grid of relAtIVElY separatEd bandWIdThS. zhang [@Zha03] FoUnd That THE corrElatIOn Between $\lAmbda_n(H)$ AnD $\lAmbda_n(cH)$ iS quite HiGh fOr $c=1.3$. as sugGEsteD by Fan And Jiang [@fanJiA07], Here we recommenD Choosing the grID oF THrEE banDwiDths $\tilde{b}_n/1.5$, $\TildE{B}_n$ anD $\tilDE{b}_N\tiMEs1.5$ to rEpresEnT SmALl, medium and large banDwIdths aNd aveRage the test ovEr the latteR GRId. Here $\tiLde{b}_N=B_n^*\TImes n^{-1/45}$ and $b_n^*$ is thE optiMal bandwidTH for nonpArameTric curvE estimatiON.

the robusT wiLd bOotStrAP {#SeCwildboots}
-------------------------

A diRECt imPlEmentatIon Of the asYmpTotIc dIstRiBution in THeorem \[thMnEwTeSt\] May Not peRForm satiSfActOrIly In praCTice duE to thE folLoWiNG twO reasonS. fiRST, the CoNvErgeNce RaTe of tEst sTAtiStic equAls $\mathrm{o}(n^{-1/9})$ wHEn baNdWiDth $b_n$ is Chosen optimalLy. the rate is qUiTe sLow and HENce the asYmptotic approximation maY Not be acCurAte foR modErate sampLes. second, As wE Can see From thE prooF oF LeMMA \[lemaSY5\] In secTiOn \[secproof
{\bolds{\beta}}^*(\cdot)=0 \quad \mbo x{ver sus }\q ua d
\b reve {H}_{a} \dvt{\ b olds {\beta}}^*(\cdot)\neq0 .$$ T he n  wec an  perf orm $\l a mb d a ^*_ n$  t o t es t in g $\b rev e{H}_{0 }$ with tr ans fo rmed regress i on  coefficie nts  ${\bolds{\b eta }}^*(\ cd ot) $  andres ponse  $\bre v e{y}_i =y_i-\mat hb f {x}_i^ \ top{\bo l d s{ \bet a}}_0(t,\hat{\the t a} _ 0)$. Note that  the l oc a ll i nea r e stimator o f${\bo l ds{\bet a }} ^ * ( \cd o t)$ has no bi as under $\ b rev e{H}_0 $and we can  avoi dt henotorious p robl em of bia s esti m ation.As ment ionedinFan  and Ji an g [ @F a nJi a 07 ],a  ch oice ofla rg er ba ndwi d t h favo rssmoo theralternativesand  a s m all er ba ndwid th t en ds to  detec t les ssmooth alternat ives . Thankstoth e i nt roduc t ion of  th e a veraged  test,t hese n s i ti vity of the test t ot h echoice o f band w id th is allev ia ted  due t o the  int r od uction o f a gr o up  o f bandw id ths. O nthe  ot her h a nd,the co rrelatio n of$ \lambda_n$ bet w een nearby ba n dw i d th s  are  us ually quite  hig h  and  hen c einp racti ce on eo nl y  needs to average t he  testovera grid of rel atively se p a r ated ban dwid t hs .  Zhang [@Zha03 ] fou nd that th e  correla tionbetween$\lambda_ n ( h)$ and$\l amb da_ n(c h ) $is quite high f or $ c= 1.3$. A s s uggeste d b y F anand  J iang [@Fa nJia07],  h er ewe  re comme n d choosi ng  th egri d oft hree b andwi dths  $ \t i lde {b}_n/1 . 5$ , $\ti ld e{ b}_n $ a nd  $\ti lde{ b }_n \times1 .5$ to re pre s entsm al l, medi um and largeba ndwidths a nd  av eraget h e test o ver the latter grid. He r e $\til de{ b}_n= b_n^ *\times n ^{- 1/45}$  an d  $b_n^ *$ isthe o pt ima l bandw i d th  fo rnonparamet r i c c urvees tima tion.
The robust wild bo o tst rap {#secwild boo ts}- - -- --- - -- - --- -- - --- - - ---

A direct i mplementat io n  o f the asym p tot ic  distri butionin Th e orem \[ thmnewtes t\] may n ot  per f o rmsatisfacto rily inpracticed ue to th e fol low ing tw orea sons.  First ,  th e con vergen ce  rateof te st  statist ic equals $\mathrm{O}(n ^{-1/9 })$ w hen  bandwidt h $ b _n$  is chose n op timally. T herat e isqui t e slo w an d  h enc e  theasym p totic app r ox ima t i on  may not be a c cur ate f orm oderat e sa mples. Second, as we can see fro m th e pro ofo f Le mm a \[lemasy5\]inSe c t ion \[se cp roof
{\bolds{\beta}}^*(\cdot)=0\quad \mbox{versus}\quad
\breve{H}_{a}_\dvt{\bolds{\beta}}^*(\cdot)\neq0.$$ Then_we can perform $\lambda^*_n$_to testing_$\breve{H}_{0}$_with transformed_regression_coefficients ${\bolds{\beta}}^*(\cdot)$ and_response $\breve{y}_i=y_i-\mathbf{x}_i^\top{\bolds{\beta}}_0(t,\hat{\theta}_0)$. Note_that the local linear_estimator of ${\bolds{\beta}}^*(\cdot)$_has_no bias under $\breve{H}_0$ and we can avoid the notorious problem of bias estimation.

As_mentioned_in Fan_and_Jiang_[@FanJia07], a choice of larger_bandwidth favors smoother alternatives and_a smaller_bandwidth tends to detect less smooth alternatives. Thanks_to_the introduction of_the averaged test, the sensitivity of the test to_the choice of bandwidth is alleviated_due to the_introduction_of_a group of bandwidths._On the other hand, the correlation_of $\lambda_n$ between nearby bandwidths are_usually quite high and hence in practice_one only needs to average the_test over a grid of_relatively separated_bandwidths. Zhang [@Zha03] found that_the correlation between_$\lambda_n(h)$ and_$\lambda_n(ch)$ is quite_high for $c=1.3$. As suggested by_Fan and Jiang_[@FanJia07], here we recommend choosing the_grid_of three bandwidths_$\tilde{b}_n/1.5$,_$\tilde{b}_n$_and $\tilde{b}_n\times1.5$_to represent small,_medium_and large_bandwidths_and average the test over the_latter_grid. Here $\tilde{b}_n=b_n^*\times n^{-1/45}$ and $b_n^*$ is_the optimal bandwidth for_nonparametric_curve estimation.

The robust wild_bootstrap {#secwildboots}
-------------------------

A direct implementation of_the asymptotic distribution in Theorem \[thmnewtest\]_may not_perform satisfactorily_in practice due to the following two reasons. First, the convergence_rate of test statistic equals $\mathrm{O}(n^{-1/9})$_when bandwidth $b_n$ is_chosen optimally._The_rate is quite_slow_and hence_the asymptotic approximation may not be accurate_for moderate_samples. Second, as we can see_from the proof of_Lemma_\[lemasy5\] in Section \[secproof