j=1]{}\^[N]{} (+łV\_[1]{}) g\_[ij]{}(Q) where the metric $g_{ij}$ is defined in (\[eq:samolst\]). As a consequence of the exponential decay of static solutions, the metric quickly becomes flat as the vortex separation increases, and $T(Q,\dot{Q})$ quickly approaches (\[eq:tapprox\]).

In summary, the evolution of a configuration of vortices in a scattering problem is expected to be well approximated by a an evolution of particles (the zeros of the Higgs field) according to the action \[eq:ourlag\] S = dt (T(Q,) - łV(Q)) where $T(Q,\dot{Q})$ is defined in (\[eq:kindef\]) and $V(Q)$ is defined in (\[eq:potdef\]).

In a recent paper [@stuart], Stuart has established some rigorous results on vortex dynamics. An existence theorem is proved for an initial value problem in configuration space, where the initial data is $O(|\l|)$ close to the moduli space, the initial field derivatives are $O(|\l|^{\half})$, and $O(|\l|)$ close to the translational zero modes (at critical coupling) on the moduli space. For a subsequent time $T^{*} = |\l|^{-\half}$ the evolution continues to satisfy the same conditions as the initial data. The point on the moduli space of closest approach to the field configuration is $O(|\l|^{\half})$ close to a Lagrangian motion given by the metric on the moduli space [*at critical coupling*]{} (\[eq:samolst\]) and the potential $V(Q)$ from (\[eq:potdef\]). This applies for all vortex configurations, not just for well separated vortices. However, the metric used is incorrect asymptotically, as the inertial mass of the vortices changes with $\l$. This contributes to the $O(|\l|^{\half})$ drift from the Hamiltonian evolution on the moduli space (this can be seen immediately by considering the motion of a single boosted near-critical vortex in the context of this problem). We anticipate that Stuart’s results would still hold if our metric (\[eq:kindef\]) was used together with the potential to give the Lagrangian evolution on the moduli space. Furthermore, in a scattering problem where the vortices are well separated except for a time of $O(T^{*})$, we conjecture that Stuart’s results may be improved to hold for all times
j=1]{}\^[N ] { } (+ łV\_[1 ] { }) g\_[ij]{}(Q) where the metric $ g_{ij}$ is defined in (\[eq: samolst\ ]). As a consequence of the exponential decay of static solutions, the system of measurement promptly becomes flat as the vortex legal separation increases, and $ T(Q,\dot{Q})$ quickly approach (\[eq: tapprox\ ]). 

 In summary, the evolution of a configuration of whirl in a scattering problem is expect to be well approximated by a an evolution of particle (the zero of the Higgs field) according to the action \[eq: ourlag\ ] S = dt (T(Q ,) - łV(Q) ) where $ T(Q,\dot{Q})$ is defined in (\[eq: kindef\ ]) and $ V(Q)$ is defined in (\[eq: potdef\ ]). 

 In a late paper [ @stuart ], Stuart has established some rigorous results on whirlpool dynamics. An existence theorem is prove for an initial value trouble in configuration space, where the initial data is $ O(|\l|)$ close to the moduli space, the initial discipline derivatives are $ O(|\l|^{\half})$, and $ O(|\l|)$ close to the translational zero modes (at critical coupling) on the moduli quad. For a subsequent time $ T^ { * } = |\l|^{-\half}$ the evolution continues to satisfy the same conditions as the initial data. The point on the moduli space of close approach to the field shape is $ O(|\l|^{\half})$ cheeseparing to a Lagrangian apparent motion given by the metric on the moduli space [ * at critical coupling * ] { } (\[eq: samolst\ ]) and the potential $ V(Q)$ from (\[eq: potdef\ ]). This applies for all whirl configurations, not just for well separated vortices. However, the metric used is faulty asymptotically, as the inertial mass of the vortices changes with $ \l$. This contributes to the $ O(|\l|^{\half})$ drift from the Hamiltonian development on the moduli outer space (this can be seen immediately by considering the motion of a single boosted about - critical vortex in the context of this problem). We anticipate that Stuart ’s results would still hold if our metric (\[eq: kindef\ ]) was used together with the electric potential to give the Lagrangian evolution on the moduli space. Furthermore, in a scattering trouble where the vortices are well separated except for a time of $ O(T^{*})$, we conjecture that Stuart ’s consequence may be improved to accommodate for all times
j=1]{}\^[N]{} (+łG\_[1]{}) g\_[ij]{}(Q) where the metric $n_{ij}$ is defined iu (\[eq:sammlst\]). Aa a consdquence of the exponential dxcay of suctic solutions, the mdtric quibkly becones hlat as the vortxs separation jkcreavxs, and $T(Q,\dot{Q})$ qoickly approdches (\[eq:tapprof\]).

Iv dummary, the evolution of a configurwtion og gortices in a fcatueryng lgonlem is expected to be well apprkximatev by a an evoluyion of particles (the zerod of the Higgs field) afcording to the qction \[eq:ouruag\] S = dt (U(Q,) - łV(Q)) where $T(Q,\dot{Q})$ is defined in (\[eq:kindef\]) xnd $V(A)$ is defingb in (\[gq:potdef\]).

In a recegt paper [@stuart], Stuast has rstablished soke cigoeous results on vortee dynamics. An existegce theoram is proved for an ibitian vanue oeobuem ii cknfigugatmon space, wgere the inutial data is $O(|\l|)$ clpsq to the modulj spacq, ehe initial field derivatives are $O(|\l|^{\halx})$, ahd $O(|\l|)$ close to the tranwlational zero modes (wt criticwl coupling) on the moduli space. For a subsequent dime $V^{*} = |\l|^{-\hcof}$ thd egolution continues to satisfy the same condityknx ss the initial data. The ppijt jn the moduli space of closest approach ho the sield configurwtiom is $O(|\l|^{\half})$ close to a Lagrqngian motiou guven by the metric on the modbli spsce [*ay critical coupling*]{} (\[eq:scmolst\]) and the pohential $V(S)$ from (\[eq:potdef\]). Tfis a[plies for all vortex confygurationw, noc just fur wgll sepwrated vorhices. However, the metric used iv incorrech asymptotically, as the inertial mass of the fostibes changzs witm $\l$. This contrifutes to the $O(|\k|^{\half})$ dxift ffom the Hajiltonien evolution on the modulh space (this ran be seqn inmeduately ch considering yhe motiou of q single boosted ncar-crkfical vortex in tht xontext of thix pfobjel). Xe anehcipate that Stuxrt’r resuuts would sbilu hokd if our metric (\[eq:khnder\]) was used togethet rith the potentiwl to give thr Lagrangian evoluuion oi the oodulo skace. Furthermore, in a scatterinf problem whcre the vortises qre well sepcrated except for a time of $O(T^{*})$, we conjecvure that Stuart’s resulrs may be improved jo mold for all timef
j=1]{}\^[N]{} (+łV\_[1]{}) g\_[ij]{}(Q) where the metric $g_{ij}$ in As a of the exponential metric becomes flat as vortex separation increases, $T(Q,\dot{Q})$ quickly approaches (\[eq:tapprox\]). In summary, evolution of a configuration of vortices in a scattering problem is expected to well approximated by a an evolution of particles (the zeros of the Higgs according the \[eq:ourlag\] = dt (T(Q,) - łV(Q)) where $T(Q,\dot{Q})$ is defined in (\[eq:kindef\]) and $V(Q)$ is defined in In a recent paper [@stuart], Stuart has established rigorous results on vortex An existence theorem is proved an value problem configuration where initial data is close to the moduli space, the initial field derivatives are $O(|\l|^{\half})$, and $O(|\l|)$ close to the translational modes (at on the space. a time $T^{*} = evolution continues to satisfy the same initial data. The point on the moduli space closest approach the field configuration is $O(|\l|^{\half})$ close a Lagrangian motion given by the metric on moduli space [*at critical coupling*]{} (\[eq:samolst\]) and the potential $V(Q)$ from (\[eq:potdef\]). This applies for configurations, not just for separated vortices. However, metric is asymptotically, the inertial of the vortices changes with $\l$. This contributes to the $O(|\l|^{\half})$ from the Hamiltonian evolution on the moduli space (this can immediately considering the motion a single boosted near-critical in context of this problem). that results if metric was used together with potential to give the Lagrangian on the moduli space. where the vortices are well separated except for time of $O(T^{*})$, we conjecture that Stuart’s may be improved to hold for all times
j=1]{}\^[N]{} (+łV\_[1]{}) g\_[ij]{}(Q) where the metric $g_{ij}$ Is defined iN (\[eq:saMolSt\]). AS a ConsEqueNce of the exponeNTial Decay of static solutions, The meTrIC quiCKlY becoMes flat AS tHE VorTeX sEpaRaTIoN incrEasEs, and $T(Q,\Dot{Q})$ quicklY apPrOaches (\[eq:tappROx\]).

in summary, tHe eVolution of a cOnfIguratIoN of VOrticEs iN a scaTterinG ProbleM is expectEd TO be welL ApproxiMATeD by a An evolution of partIClES (the zeros of the higgs fIeLD) aCCOrdIng To the actioN \[eQ:ourlAG\] S = dt (T(Q,) - łv(q)) wHERE $T(Q,\DOt{Q})$ is defined iN (\[eq:kindef\]) anD $v(Q)$ iS definEd In (\[eQ:Potdef\]).

in a reCeNT paPer [@stuart], StUart Has establIshed sOMe rigorOUs resulTs on voRteX dyNamiCS. AN eXisTeNCe tHEoRem IS prOved for aN iNiTial vAlue PROBLem iN coNfigUratiOn space, where tHe iNitiAL daTa is $O(|\L|)$ closE to tHe ModulI space, The inItIal field derivatIves Are $O(|\l|^{\half})$, And $o(|\l|)$ CloSe To the TRanslaTioNal Zero modEs (at criTIcaL cOUPLiNg) on the moduli space. foR A SuBsequent Time $T^{*} = |\l|^{-\HAlF}$ tHE evolutiOn ConTinuES To satIsfy THe Same condItions AS tHe Initial DaTa. The pOiNt oN thE moduLI spaCe of clOsest appRoach TO the field confiGUration is $O(|\l|^{\haLF})$ cLOSe TO a LaGraNgian motion GiveN By thE metRIc On tHE moduLi spaCe [*AT cRItical coupling*]{} (\[eq:samOlSt\]) and tHe potEntial $V(Q)$ from (\[eQ:potdef\]). ThiS APPlies for All vORtEX configurationS, not jUst for well SEparated VortiCes. HowevEr, the metrIC Used is inCorRecT asYmpTOTiCally, as the ineRTIal mAsS of the vOrtIces chaNgeS wiTh $\l$. thiS cOntributeS to the $O(|\l|^{\HaLf})$ DrIfT frOm the hAmiltoniAn EvoLuTioN on thE Moduli Space (This CaN bE SeeN immediATeLY By coNsIdErinG thE mOtion Of a sINglE boosteD near-critIcaL VortEx In The contExt of this probLeM). We anticipAtE thAt StuaRT’S results Would still hold if our metrIC (\[eq:kindEf\]) wAs useD togEther with The PotentIal TO give tHe LagrAngiaN eVolUTIon on THE mOduLi Space. FurthERMorE, in a sCaTterIng probLem where the vorticeS Are Well separated ExcEpt fOR A tIme OF $O(t^{*})$, We cOnJEctURE that Stuart’s resUlts may be iMpROvEd to hold foR All TiMes
j=1]{}\^[N]{} (+łV\_[1]{})  g\_[ij]{} (Q) w her e t he  met ric$g_{ij}$ is de f ined  in (\[eq:samolst\]).As aco n sequ e nc e ofthe exp o ne n t ial  d ec ayof st aticsol utions,  the metri c q ui ckly becomes fl at as thevor tex separati onincrea se s,a nd $T (Q, \dot{ Q})$ q u icklyapproache s( \[eq:t a pprox\] ) . 
In s ummary, the evolu t io n  of a configur ationof vo r t ice s i n a scatte ri ng pr o blem is ex p e c ted to be well ap proximatedb y a  an ev ol uti o n of p artic le s  (t he zeros of  the  Higgs fi eld) a c cording to theaction  \[ eq: ourl a g\ ]S =  d t  (T ( Q, ) - łV( Q)) wher e$T (Q,\d ot{Q } ) $ is d efi nedin (\ [eq:kindef\])  an d $V ( Q)$  is d efine d in  ( \[eq: potdef \]).
I n a recent pape r [@ stuart],Stu ar t h as  esta b lished  so merigorou s resul t s o nv o r te x dynamics. An exi st e n ce  theorem  is pr o ve df or an in it ial  val u e  prob lemi nconfigur ations pa ce , where  t he ini ti aldat a is$ O(|\ l|)$ c lose tothe m o duli space, th e  initial fiel d  d e r iv a tive s a re $O(|\l|^ {\ha l f})$ , an d  $ O(| \ l|)$close  t o  t h e translational zer omodes(at c ritical coupl ing) on th e m oduli sp ace. Fo r  a subsequenttime$T^{*} = | \ l|^{-\ha lf}$the evol ution con t i nues tosat isf y t hes a me  conditions a s thein itial d ata . The p oin t o n t hemo duli spac e of clo se st  a pp roa ch to the fiel dcon fi gur ation is $O( |\l|^ {\ha lf }) $  cl ose toa  L a g rang ia nmoti ongi ven b y th e  me tric on  the modu lis pace  [ *a t criti cal coupling* ]{ } (\[eq:sa mo lst \]) an d the pote ntial $V(Q)$ from (\[eq : potdef\ ]).  This  app lies forall  vorte x c o nfigur ations , not  j ust f or we l l  s epa ra ted vortic e s . H oweve r,  the  metric  used is incorrect asy mptotically,asthei n er tia l  m a ssof the v ortices changes  with $\l$ .T hi s contribu t esto  the $O (|\l|^{ \half } )$ drif t from th e Hamilto ni an e v o lut ion on the  modulispace (th i s can be  seen  im mediat el y b y con sideri n g t he mo tion o fa sing le bo os ted near -critical vortex in the  conte xt of  th is proble m). Weanticipat e th at Stuart’ s r esu lts w oul d  stil l ho l difo ur me tric (\[eq:kin d ef \]) w as  used toget h e r  wi th th e p o tentia l to  give the Lagrang i an evolution o n th e mod uli spac e.  Furthermore,inas c attering  p roblem wher e the vo rt i ces a re wel l sepa rated e x c ep t  for a  tim e o f $O(T^{* })$ ,w e conje ct ur e  thatStua rt ’s res ults m a y be i mproved to holdfor a l l  time s 
j=1]{}\^[N]{} (+łV\_[1]{})_g\_[ij]{}(Q) where_the metric $g_{ij}$ is_defined in_(\[eq:samolst\])._As a_consequence_of the exponential_decay of static_solutions, the metric quickly_becomes flat as_the_vortex separation increases, and $T(Q,\dot{Q})$ quickly approaches (\[eq:tapprox\]).

In summary, the evolution of a configuration_of_vortices in_a_scattering_problem is expected to be_well approximated by a an_evolution of_particles (the zeros of the Higgs field) according_to_the action \[eq:ourlag\]_S = dt (T(Q,) - łV(Q)) where $T(Q,\dot{Q})$ is_defined in (\[eq:kindef\]) and $V(Q)$ is_defined in (\[eq:potdef\]).

In_a_recent_paper [@stuart], Stuart has_established some rigorous results on vortex_dynamics. An existence theorem is proved_for an initial value problem in configuration_space, where the initial data is_$O(|\l|)$ close to the moduli_space, the_initial field derivatives are $O(|\l|^{\half})$,_and $O(|\l|)$ close_to the_translational zero modes_(at critical coupling) on the moduli_space. For a_subsequent time $T^{*} = |\l|^{-\half}$ the_evolution_continues to satisfy_the_same_conditions as_the initial data._The_point on_the_moduli space of closest approach to_the_field configuration is $O(|\l|^{\half})$ close to a_Lagrangian motion given by_the_metric on the moduli_space [*at critical coupling*]{} (\[eq:samolst\])_and the potential $V(Q)$ from (\[eq:potdef\])._This applies_for all_vortex configurations, not just for well separated vortices. However, the metric_used is incorrect asymptotically, as the_inertial mass of the_vortices changes_with_$\l$. This contributes_to_the $O(|\l|^{\half})$_drift from the Hamiltonian evolution on the_moduli space_(this can be seen immediately by_considering the motion of_a_single boosted near-critical vortex in the_context of this problem). We anticipate_that Stuart’s results would still_hold_if_our metric (\[eq:kindef\]) was used_together with the potential to give_the Lagrangian evolution_on the moduli space. Furthermore, in a_scattering_problem where the vortices are well_separated_except for a time of $O(T^{*})$,_we_conjecture_that Stuart’s results may be_improved to hold for all times