 as implications for future RG/EB studies.

Observations {#data}
============

*Kepler* light curves {#kepler}
---------------------

Our light curves are from the *Kepler* Space Telescope in long-cadence mode (one data point every 29.4 minutes), and span 17 quarters—roughly four years—with only occasional gaps. These light curves are well-suited for red giant asteroseismology, as main sequence stars with convective envelopes oscillate too rapidly to be measured with *Kepler* long-cadence data.

When studying long-period eclipsing binaries, it is important to remove instrumental effects in the light curve while preserving the astrophysically interesting signal. In this work, we prioritize preserving eclipses. Our detrending algorithm uses the simple aperture photometry (SAP) long-cadence *Kepler* data for quarters 0–17. First, any observations with NaNs are removed, and observations from different quarters are put onto the same median level so that the eclipses line up. The out-of-eclipse portions of the light curve are flattened, which removes any out-of-eclipse variability. For eclipse modeling, we use only the portions of the light curve that lie within one eclipse duration of the start and end of each eclipse. This differs from the light curve processing needed for asteroseismology, [which typically]{} “fills” the eclipses to minimize their effect on the power spectrum [@gau14].

The processed light curve is presented in Figure \[fig:keplerfig\]. The top panel shows the entire detrended light curve, while the middle and bottom panels indicate the regions near each eclipse used in this work. We adopt the convention that the “primary” eclipse is the deeper of the two, when Star 1 is eclipsing Star 2. The geometry of the system creates partial eclipses with different depths due to similarly-sized stars in an eccentric orbit viewed with an inclination less than 90 degrees. [For comparison, we present the detrended light curve with eclipses removed in Figure \[fig:lcfig2\]. The system shows out-of-eclipse photometric modulations on the order of $2 \%$.]{}

![image](fig1.png){width="1.8\columnwidth"}

![image](fig2-eps-converted-to.pdf){width="1.7\columnwidth"}

Ground-based
as implications for future RG / EB studies. 

 Observations { # data } 
 = = = = = = = = = = = = 

 * Kepler * light curve { # kepler } 
 --------------------- 

 Our faint curves are from the * Kepler * Space Telescope in long - cadence modality (one data point every 29.4 minute), and cross 17 quarters — roughly four years — with only occasional col. These light curves are well - suit for crimson giant asteroseismology, as main sequence stars with convective envelopes hover too rapidly to be measured with * Kepler * farseeing - cadence data. 

 When study long - time period eclipsing binaries, it is important to remove instrumental impression in the light curve while preserving the astrophysically interesting signal. In this work, we prioritize preserving eclipse. Our detrending algorithm use the simple aperture photometry (SAP) long - cadence * Kepler * data for quarters 0–17. First, any observations with NaNs are removed, and observations from unlike quarter are put onto the like medial level so that the eclipses line up. The out - of - eclipse portions of the clean curvature are flattened, which removes any knocked out - of - eclipse variability. For eclipse modeling, we use only the portions of the light bend that lie within one eclipse duration of the start and end of each eclipse. This differs from the clean curvature processing needed for asteroseismology, [ which typically ] { } “ fills ” the eclipses to minimize their effect on the world power spectrum [ @gau14 ]. 

 The processed light curve is presented in Figure \[fig: keplerfig\ ]. The top panel shows the entire detrended light bend, while the middle and bottom gore indicate the regions near each eclipse use in this work. We assume the convention that the “ chief ” eclipse is the deeper of the two, when Star 1 is eclipse Star 2. The geometry of the system creates partial eclipses with different depth due to similarly - sized stars in an bizarre orbit viewed with an inclination less than 90 degrees. [ For comparison, we confront the detrended unaccented curve with eclipses remove in Figure \[fig: lcfig2\ ]. The system shows out - of - eclipse photometric modulation on the order of $ 2 \%$. ] { } 

! [ image](fig1.png){width="1.8\columnwidth " } 

! [ image](fig2 - eps - converted - to.pdf){width="1.7\columnwidth " } 

 Ground - based
 as implications for future RG/EB studies.

Observatimns {#dafa}
============

*Kepler* light curves {#kepler}
---------------------

Our lighv cueves qre from the *Kepler* Spxce Telesbope in ling-cedence mode (one vzta poikc evedn 29.4 miuuves), and span 17 qoarters—roughny four years—whtf lnly occasional gaps. These light cuwves arr aell-suited for red dianf asteroseismology, as main sequencs stars with convectove envelopes oscillate tol raoidly to be measurfd with *Kepoer* jing-cadence dxta.

When stlbying long-pgriod eclipsing binaries, it is ioportcnt to remoce indjrumental efhects pn the light glrve whhle prexerving the asbrophbsicqlly interesting signel. In this work, we ptioritize [rzserving eclipses. Our dwtrenging algueitfm hsxs fhe silplx aperture lhotometry (WAP) long-cadence *Kepkew* data for quadters 0–17. Fyrst, any observations with NaNs are remmves, and observations from different quarters ate put ontj the same median level so that the eclipses line up. Tie ouu-on-ccliowe portions of the light curve are flattened, whydh rvmoves any out-of-eglipse variability. Flr gclipse modelivg, we bae only the portions of the lighr curve trat kie within one eclipse durarion of the frart and end of eaeh eclipse. Tkis digfers from the light curve pxocessjng needed vor asterkreismology, [which tyiicanly]{} “fills” the eclipses to iinimize vheir effect on jhe powqr spectrul [@gau14].

Bve processed light curvg is psesented ij Figure \[fig:keplerfig\]. The top peiel shows the ettige detrenbed linht curve, while the middle anb bottom paneus indicatv the regmons near eash eclipse usaf in this wock. We ado[t tye cinventiuv that the “prikary” ecliist is the dweper of the two, wmen Sjad 1 is eclipsing Stqr 2. The geometru ow tre sbstem wreates parthal dclklses dith differcnt depyhs due to similarly-vizes stars in an eccemtvic orbit viewed rith an inclimation less than 90 fegrexs. [For compsrifon, we present the detrended ljght curvf wlth eclipses wemoyed yn Figure \[yig:lcfig2\]. The system shows out-of-eclipse piotometric modulations in the order of $2 \%$.]{}

![imcgt](fig1.png){width="1.8\cplumnridth"}

![imaga](fig2-eps-converted-to.pdd){width="1.7\columnwidth"}

Nround-based
as implications for future RG/EB studies. Observations *Kepler* curves {#kepler} Our light curves Telescope long-cadence mode (one point every 29.4 and span 17 quarters—roughly four years—with occasional gaps. These light curves are well-suited for red giant asteroseismology, as main stars with convective envelopes oscillate too rapidly to be measured with *Kepler* long-cadence When long-period binaries, is important to remove instrumental effects in the light curve while preserving the astrophysically interesting signal. this work, we prioritize preserving eclipses. Our detrending uses the simple aperture (SAP) long-cadence *Kepler* data for 0–17. any observations NaNs removed, observations from different are put onto the same median level so that the eclipses line up. The out-of-eclipse portions of light curve which removes out-of-eclipse For modeling, we use portions of the light curve that eclipse duration of the start and end of eclipse. This from the light curve processing needed asteroseismology, [which typically]{} “fills” the eclipses to minimize effect on the power spectrum [@gau14]. The processed light curve is presented in Figure \[fig:keplerfig\]. panel shows the entire light curve, while middle bottom indicate regions near eclipse used in this work. We adopt the convention that the eclipse is the deeper of the two, when Star 1 Star The geometry of system creates partial eclipses different due to similarly-sized stars eccentric viewed less 90 [For comparison, we present detrended light curve with eclipses in Figure \[fig:lcfig2\]. The on the order of $2 \%$.]{} ![image](fig1.png){width="1.8\columnwidth"} ![image](fig2-eps-converted-to.pdf){width="1.7\columnwidth"}
 as implications for future RG/eB studies.

OBservAtiOns {#DaTa}
============

*KePler* Light curves {#kepLEr}
---------------------

OuR light curves are from the *kepleR* SPAce TELeScope In long-cADeNCE moDe (OnE daTa POiNt eveRy 29.4 mInutes), aNd span 17 quarTerS—rOughly four yeARs—With only ocCasIonal gaps. TheSe lIght cuRvEs aRE well-SuiTed foR red giANt asteRoseismolOgY, As main SEquence STArS witH convective enveloPEs OScillate too rapIdly to Be MEaSURed WitH *Kepler* lonG-cAdencE Data.

WheN StUDYIng LOng-period ecliPsing binariES, it Is impoRtAnt TO removE instRuMEntAl effects in The lIght curve While pREservinG The astrOphysiCalLy iNterEStInG siGnAL. In THiS woRK, we PrioritiZe PrEservIng eCLIPSes. OUr dEtreNding Algorithm uses The SimpLE apErturE photOmetRy (sAP) loNg-cadeNce *KePlEr* data for quarteRs 0–17. FiRst, any obsErvAtIonS wIth NanS are reMovEd, aNd obserVations FRom DiFFEReNt quarters are put onTo THE sAme mediaN level SO tHaT The eclipSeS liNe up. tHE out-oF-eclIPsE portionS of the LIgHt Curve arE fLattenEd, WhiCh rEmoveS Any oUt-of-ecLipse varIabilITy. For eclipse moDEling, we use onlY ThE POrTIons Of tHe light curvE thaT Lie wIthiN OnE ecLIpse dUratiOn OF tHE start and end of each eClIpse. ThIs difFers from the liGht curve prOCESsing neeDed fOR aSTeroseismology, [Which Typically]{} “fILls” the ecLipseS to minimIze their eFFEct on the PowEr sPecTruM [@GAu14].

the processed lIGHt cuRvE is presEntEd in FigUre \[Fig:KepLerFiG\]. The top paNel shows ThE eNtIrE deTrendED light cuRvE, whIlE thE middLE and boTtom pAnelS iNdICatE the regIOnS NEar eAcH eClipSe uSeD in thIs woRK. We Adopt thE conventiOn tHAt thE “pRiMary” eclIpse is the deepEr Of the two, whEn staR 1 is eclIPSing Star 2. the geometry of the system cREates paRtiAl eclIpseS with diffEreNt deptHs dUE to simIlarly-Sized StArs IN An eccENTrIc oRbIt viewed wiTH An iNclinAtIon lEss than 90 Degrees. [For comparisON, we Present the detRenDed lIGHt CurVE wITh eClIPseS REmoved in Figure \[fIg:lcfig2\]. The SySTeM shows out-oF-EclIpSe photoMetric mOdulaTIons on tHe order of $2 \%$.]{}

![Image](fig1.pNg){WidtH="1.8\COluMnwidth"}

![imaGe](fig2-eps-Converted-TO.pdf){wIDtH="1.7\coluMnwIdth"}

GrOuNd-bAsed
 as implications for futur e RG/EB st udies .
Obs er vati ons{#data}
====== = ==== =

*Kepler* light curv es {# ke p ler} -- ----- ------- - -- - - --
O ur  li gh t  c urves  ar e fromthe *Keple r*Sp ace Telescop e  i n long-cad enc e mode (onedat a poin teve r y 29. 4 m inute s), an d  span17 quarte rs — roughl y  four y e a rs —wit h only occasional ga p s. These light  curve sa re w ell -su ited for r ed  gian t  astero s ei s m o log y , as main seq uence stars wit h conv ec tiv e  envel opesos c ill ate too rap idly  to be me asured with *K e pler* l ong-ca den cedata . 
Wh enst u dyi n glon g -pe riod ecl ip si ng bi nari e s , it i s i mpor tantto remove ins tru ment a l e ffect s intheli ght c urve w hilepr eserving the as trop hysically  in te res ti ng si g nal. I n t his  work,we prio r iti ze p r es erving eclipses. O ur d et rendingalgori t hm  u s es the s im ple  ape r t ure p hoto m et ry (SAP)  long- c ad en ce *Kep le r* dat afor  qu arter s  0–1 7. Fir st, anyobser v ations with Na N s are removed ,  a n d  o b serv ati ons from di ffer e nt q uart e rs  ar e  putontoth e  s a me median level soth at the  ecli pses line up.  The out-o f - e clipse p orti o ns of the light c urveare flatte n ed, whic h rem oves any  out-of-e c l ipse var iab ili ty.  Fo r ec lipse modelin g ,  weus e onlythe  portio nsofthe  li gh t curve t hat liewi th in  o neeclip s e durati on  of  t hestart and en d ofeach  e cl i pse . Thisd if f e rs f ro mthelig ht  curv e pr o ces sing ne eded forast e rose is mo logy, [ which typical ly ]{} “fills ”the  eclip s e s to min imize their effect on t h e power  sp ectru m [@ gau14].
The  proce sse d  light  curve  is p re sen t e d inF i gu re\[ fig:kepler f i g\] . The  t op p anel sh ows the entire det r end ed light curv e,whil e th e m i dd l e a nd bot t o m panels indica te the reg io n snear eache cli ps e usedin this  work .  We ado pt the co nventionth at t h e  “p rimary” ec lipse is  the deep e r oft he  two,  wh en Sta r1 i s ecl ipsing Sta r 2.The ge om etry o f the  s ystem cr eates partial eclipseswith d iffer ent  depths d uet o s imilarly- size d stars in  an  ec centr ico rbitview e dwit h  an i ncli n ation les s  t han 9 0degrees. [F o r com paris on, we pre sent  the detrended li g ht curve withecli p s esrem o vedin  Figure \[fig: lcf ig 2 \ ]. The s ys tem shows o ut-of-ec li p se ph otomet ric mo dulatio n s  o n  the o rder  of  $2 \%$.] {}
! [ image]( fi g1 . png){w idth =" 1.8\co lumnwi d th"} ![image](fig2-ep s-con v e rted- t o.p df){w id th="1.7 \ colu mnwidth"}
Ground-bas ed
 as_implications for_future RG/EB studies.

Observations {#data}
============

*Kepler*_light curves_{#kepler}
---------------------

Our_light curves_are_from the *Kepler*_Space Telescope in_long-cadence mode (one data_point every 29.4_minutes),_and span 17 quarters—roughly four years—with only occasional gaps. These light curves are well-suited_for_red giant_asteroseismology,_as_main sequence stars with convective_envelopes oscillate too rapidly to_be measured_with *Kepler* long-cadence data.

When studying long-period eclipsing binaries,_it_is important to_remove instrumental effects in the light curve while preserving_the astrophysically interesting signal. In this_work, we prioritize_preserving_eclipses._Our detrending algorithm uses_the simple aperture photometry (SAP) long-cadence_*Kepler* data for quarters 0–17. First,_any observations with NaNs are removed, and_observations from different quarters are put_onto the same median level_so that_the eclipses line up. The_out-of-eclipse portions of_the light_curve are flattened,_which removes any out-of-eclipse variability. For_eclipse modeling, we_use only the portions of the_light_curve that lie_within_one_eclipse duration_of the start_and_end of_each_eclipse. This differs from the light_curve_processing needed for asteroseismology, [which typically]{} “fills”_the eclipses to minimize_their_effect on the power_spectrum [@gau14].

The processed light curve_is presented in Figure \[fig:keplerfig\]. The_top panel_shows the_entire detrended light curve, while the middle and bottom panels indicate_the regions near each eclipse used_in this work. We_adopt the_convention_that the “primary”_eclipse_is the_deeper of the two, when Star 1_is eclipsing_Star 2. The geometry of the_system creates partial eclipses_with_different depths due to similarly-sized stars_in an eccentric orbit viewed with_an inclination less than 90_degrees._[For_comparison, we present the detrended_light curve with eclipses removed in_Figure \[fig:lcfig2\]. The_system shows out-of-eclipse photometric modulations on the_order_of $2 \%$.]{}

![image](fig1.png){width="1.8\columnwidth"}

![image](fig2-eps-converted-to.pdf){width="1.7\columnwidth"}

Ground-based