 the unknown ratings of items that the users have not reviewed yet. A review $d_{u,i}$ is a piece of text which describes opinions of user $u$ on different aspects $a \in \mathcal{A}$ towards item $i$, such as *food* for *restaurants*. In this paper, we only consider the case that all the items are from the same category, i.e., they share the same set of aspects $\mathcal{A}$. Aspects that users care for items are latent and learned from reviews by our proposed topic model, in which each aspect is represented as a distribution of the same set (e.g., $K$) of latent topics. Table \[tab:notation\] lists the key notations. Before introducing our method, we would like to first clarify the concepts of *aspects*, *latent topics*, and *latent factors*.

-   **Aspect** - it is a high-level semantic concept, which represents the attribute of items that users commented on in reviews, such as *“food”* for *restaurant* and *“battery"* for *mobile phones*.

-   **Latent topic & latent factor** - in our context, both concepts represent a more fine-grained concept than *“aspect"*. A latent topic or factor can be regarded as a *sub-aspect* of an item. For instance, for the “food" aspect, a related latent topic could be “*breakfast*" or “*Italian cuisine*". We adopt the terminology of *latent topic* in topic models and *latent factor* in matrix factorization. Accordingly, “latent topics" are discovered by topic model on reviews, and “latent factors" are learned by matrix factorization on ratings.

Aspect-aware Latent Factor Model
--------------------------------

Based on the observations that (1) different users may care for different aspects of an item and (2) users’ preferences may differ from each other for the same aspect, we claim that the overall satisfaction of a user $u$ towards an item $i$ (i.e., the overall rating $r_{u,i}$) depends on $u$’s satisfaction on each aspect $a$ of $i$ (i.e., *aspect rating* $r_{u,i,a}$) and the importance of each aspect (of $i$) to $u$ (i.e.,
the unknown ratings of items that the users have not review so far. A review $ d_{u, i}$ is a piece of text which report opinions of user $ u$ on unlike aspects $ a \in \mathcal{A}$ towards item $ i$, such as * food * for * restaurants *. In this composition, we only consider the character that all the items are from the same class, i.e., they share the same set of aspects $ \mathcal{A}$. Aspects that users care for items are latent and learn from reviews by our proposed topic mannequin, in which each aspect is represented as a distribution of the same set (for example, $ K$) of latent topics. board   \[tab: notation\ ] lists the key notations. Before introduce our method, we would like to first clarify the concepts of * aspects *, * latent subject *, and * latent factors *. 

 -    * * Aspect * * - it is a high - level semantic concept, which represents the attribute of items that users commented on in reviews, such as * “ food ” * for * restaurant * and * “ barrage " * for * fluid phones *. 

 -    * * Latent topic & latent factor * * - in our context, both concept map a more fine - grained concept than * “ view " *. A latent topic or factor can be regarded as a * sub - aspect * of an token. For instance, for the “ food " aspect, a related latent topic could be “ * breakfast * " or “ * Italian cuisine * ". We adopt the terminology of * latent topic * in topic model and * latent factor * in matrix factorization. Accordingly, “ latent topics " are discovered by topic model on follow-up, and “ latent gene " are learned by matrix factorization on ratings. 

 Aspect - mindful Latent Factor Model 
 -------------------------------- 

 Based on the observations that (1) different users may care for different aspects of an item and (2) users ’ preference may differ from each early for the same aspect, we claim that the overall satisfaction of a user $ u$ towards an item $ i$ (i.e., the overall evaluation $ r_{u, i}$) depends on $ u$ ’s gratification on each aspect $ a$ of $ i$ (i.e., * expression rating * $ r_{u, i, a}$) and the importance of each aspect (of $ i$) to $ u$ (i.e.,
 thf unknown ratings of iteos that the usets have iot revjewed yeg. A review $d_{u,i}$ is a piece of twxt wyich describes opinionr of user $u$ on didfertnt aspects $a \in \mathcal{A}$ towarsd itzm $i$, such as *fooc* for *restdurants*. In thiv oa'er, we only consider the case that ajl the otfms are from tre ssie cznenory, i.e., they share the same set kf aspebts $\mathcal{A}$. Aspevts that users care for itfms wre latent and leagned from rgbierw by our prooosed topib model, in shich each aspect is representea as c distributuob ov the same sxt (e.g., $H$) of latent bppics. Dable \[tan:notation\] listx tie kwy notations. Before iitroducing our methoq, we woulg mike to first claeidy thg conweptr of *askecvs*, *matent to'ics*, and *lafent factorw*.

-   **Aspect** - it is a hyth-level semanfic cogcqpt, which represents the attribute of iuems fhat users commented on in reviews, such as *“flod”* for *rqstaurant* and *“battery"* for *mobile phones*.

-   **Latent dopic & lauekb fazrog** - in our context, both concepts represent a mjde fpne-grained concepb than *“aspect"*. A layejt jopic or factot can bz rsgarded as a *sub-asoect* of an irem. For igstamce, for the “food" aspect, a rwlated latenn topic could be “*breakyast*" or “*Italnan cuosine*". We adopt the terminoloyy of *matent topif* in topid models and *latevt nacdor* in matrix factorizatiog. Accordiigly, “katent gopivs" are discoveref by bmpic model on revifws, aud “ladent factogs" are learned by matrix factormvation on ratoncs.

Avpect-awaxe Latcnt Factor Modej
--------------------------------

Based on the pbservacions ghat (1) diffvrent usecs may care sor different wspects of ai item anq (2) uwers’ preferdvces may diffet from eabh othwr for the same asiect, ds claim that thz iverall satisfavtiun jf a ufar $u$ towards an kteo $i$ (i.e., the ovtxalo ratong $r_{u,i}$) depends on $u$’v safisfaction on each afpect $a$ if $i$ (i.e., *wspect rating* $r_{u,i,a}$) and the impogtancx of eech aslecj (of $i$) to $u$ (i.e.,
the unknown ratings of items that the not yet. A $d_{u,i}$ is a opinions user $u$ on aspects $a \in towards item $i$, such as *food* *restaurants*. In this paper, we only consider the case that all the items from the same category, i.e., they share the same set of aspects $\mathcal{A}$. that care items latent and learned from reviews by our proposed topic model, in which each aspect is represented a distribution of the same set (e.g., $K$) latent topics. Table \[tab:notation\] the key notations. Before introducing method, would like first the of *aspects*, *latent and *latent factors*. - **Aspect** - it is a high-level semantic concept, which represents the attribute of that users in reviews, as for and *“battery"* for - **Latent topic & latent factor** context, both concepts represent a more fine-grained concept *“aspect"*. A topic or factor can be regarded a *sub-aspect* of an item. For instance, for “food" aspect, a related latent topic could be “*breakfast*" or “*Italian cuisine*". We adopt the *latent topic* in topic and *latent factor* matrix Accordingly, topics" discovered by model on reviews, and “latent factors" are learned by matrix factorization ratings. Aspect-aware Latent Factor Model -------------------------------- Based on the observations different may care for aspects of an item (2) preferences may differ from for same that overall of a user $u$ an item $i$ (i.e., the rating $r_{u,i}$) depends on $a$ of $i$ (i.e., *aspect rating* $r_{u,i,a}$) and importance of each aspect (of $i$) to (i.e.,
 the unknown ratings of items tHat the userS have Not RevIeWed yEt. A rEview $d_{u,i}$ is a pieCE of tExt which describes opiniOns of UsER $u$ on DIfFerenT aspectS $A \iN \MAthCaL{A}$ TowArDS iTem $i$, sUch As *food* fOr *restauraNts*. in This paper, we oNLy Consider thE caSe that all the IteMs are fRoM thE Same cAteGory, i.E., they sHAre the Same set of AsPEcts $\maTHcal{A}$. AsPECtS thaT users care for itemS ArE Latent and learnEd from ReVIeWS By oUr pRoposed topIc Model, IN which eACh ASPEct IS represented aS a distributIOn oF the saMe Set (E.G., $K$) of laTent tOpICs. TAble \[tab:notaTion\] Lists the kEy notaTIons. BefORe introDucing Our MetHod, wE WoUlD liKe TO fiRSt ClaRIfy The concePtS oF *aspeCts*, *lATENT topIcs*, And *lAtent Factors*.

-   **Aspect** - It iS a hiGH-leVel seMantiC conCePt, whiCh reprEsentS tHe attribute of itEms tHat users cOmmEnTed On In revIEws, sucH as *“FooD”* for *resTaurant* ANd *“bAtTERY"* fOr *mobile phones*.

-   **LateNt TOPiC & latent fActor** - iN OuR cONtext, botH cOncEpts REPreseNt a mORe Fine-graiNed conCEpT tHan *“aspeCt"*. a latenT tOpiC or FactoR Can bE regarDed as a *suB-aspeCT* of an item. For inSTance, for the “foOD" aSPEcT, A relAteD latent topiC couLD be “*bReakFAsT*" or “*iTaliaN cuisInE*". we ADopt the terminology oF *lAtent tOpic* iN topic models aNd *latent faCTOR* in matriX facTOrIZation. AccordinGly, “laTent topics" ARe discovEred bY topic moDel on reviEWS, and “lateNt fActOrs" Are LEArNed by matrix faCTOrizAtIon on raTinGs.

AspecT-awAre latEnt faCtor Model
--------------------------------

based on tHe ObSeRvAtiOns thAT (1) differeNt UseRs May Care fOR diffeRent aSpecTs Of AN itEm and (2) usERs’ PREferEnCeS may DifFeR from Each OTheR for the Same aspecT, we CLaim ThAt The overAll satisfactiOn Of a user $u$ toWaRds An item $I$ (I.E., the overAll rating $r_{u,i}$) depends on $u$’s SAtisfacTioN on eaCh asPect $a$ of $i$ (i.E., *asPect raTinG* $R_{u,i,a}$) anD the imPortaNcE of EACh aspECT (oF $i$) tO $u$ (I.e.,
 the unknown ratings of it ems that t he us ers  ha ve  not  rev iewed yet. A r e view  $d_{u,i}$ is a pieceof te xt whic h  d escri bes opi n io n s  of  u se r $ u$ on  diff ere nt aspe cts $a \in  \m at hcal{A}$ tow a rd s item $i$ , s uch as *food * f or *re st aur a nts*.  In  this  paper ,  we on ly consid er the ca s e thata l ltheitems are from th e  s a me category, i .e., t he y  s h a rethe  same setof  aspe c ts $\ma t hc a l { A}$ .  Aspects that  users care for  items  a rel atentand l ea r ned  from revie ws b y our pro posedt opic mo d el, inwhicheac h a spec t  i srep re s ent e dasa  di stributi on  o f the  sam e s e t (e .g. , $K $) of  latent topic s.Tabl e  \[ tab:n otati on\]  l iststhe ke y not at ions. Before in trod ucing our  me th od,  w e wou l d like  to  fi rst cla rify th e  co nc e p t sof *aspects*, *lat en t to pics*, a nd *la t en tf actors*. 
-  **A s p ect**  - i t  i s a high -level se ma ntic co nc ept, w hi chrep resen t s th e attr ibute of  item s  that users co m mented on inr ev i e ws ,  suc h a s *“food”*for* rest aura n t*  an d  *“ba ttery "* fo r  *mobile phones*.
-  **La tenttopic & laten t factor** - in our c onte x t, both conceptsrepre sent a mor e  fine-gr ained  concept  than *“a s p ect"*. A  la ten t t opi c or  factor can b e rega rd ed as a  *s ub-aspe ct*  of  an  it em . For ins tance, f or  t he  “ foo d" as p ect, a r el ate dlat ent t o pic co uld b e “* br ea k fas t*" or“ *I t a lian  c ui sine *".  W e ado pt t h e t erminol ogy of *l ate n t to pi c*  in top ic models and  * latent fac to r*in mat r i x factor ization. Accordingly, “ l atent t opi cs" a re d iscovered  by  topic  mo d el onreview s, an d“la t e nt fa c t or s"ar e learnedb y  ma trixfa ctor ization  on ratings.

Aspe c t-a ware Latent F act or M o d el 
-- - -- - --- -- - --- - - --------------- 

Based on  t h eobservatio n s t ha t (1) d ifferen t use r s may c are for d ifferentas pect s ofan item an d (2) us ers’ pref e rence s  m ay di ffe r from  e ach  othe r fort hesameaspect ,we cla im th at  the ove rall satisfaction of auser $ u$ to war ds an ite m $ i $ ( i.e., the  ove rall ratin g $ r_{ u,i}$ ) d e pends  on$ u$ ’ss atisf acti o n on each as pec t $a $ of $i$ (i . e . , * aspec t r a ting*$r_{ u,i,a}$) and thei mportance of e acha s pec t ( o f $i $)  to $u$ (i.e., 
 the_unknown ratings_of items that the_users have_not_reviewed yet._A_review $d_{u,i}$ is_a piece of_text which describes opinions_of user $u$_on_different aspects $a \in \mathcal{A}$ towards item $i$, such as *food* for *restaurants*. In_this_paper, we_only_consider_the case that all the_items are from the same_category, i.e.,_they share the same set of aspects $\mathcal{A}$._Aspects_that users care_for items are latent and learned from reviews by_our proposed topic model, in which_each aspect is_represented_as_a distribution of the_same set (e.g., $K$) of latent_topics. Table \[tab:notation\] lists the key notations._Before introducing our method, we would like_to first clarify the concepts of_*aspects*, *latent topics*, and *latent_factors*.

- _ **Aspect** - it is_a high-level semantic_concept, which_represents the attribute_of items that users commented on_in reviews, such_as *“food”* for *restaurant* and *“battery"*_for_*mobile phones*.

- __**Latent_topic &_latent factor** -_in_our context,_both_concepts represent a more fine-grained concept_than_*“aspect"*. A latent topic or factor can_be regarded as a_*sub-aspect*_of an item. For_instance, for the “food" aspect,_a related latent topic could be_“*breakfast*" or_“*Italian cuisine*"._We adopt the terminology of *latent topic* in topic models and_*latent factor* in matrix factorization. Accordingly,_“latent topics" are discovered_by topic_model_on reviews, and_“latent_factors" are_learned by matrix factorization on ratings.

Aspect-aware Latent_Factor Model
--------------------------------

Based_on the observations that (1) different_users may care for_different_aspects of an item and (2)_users’ preferences may differ from each_other for the same aspect,_we_claim_that the overall satisfaction of_a user $u$ towards an item_$i$ (i.e., the_overall rating $r_{u,i}$) depends on $u$’s satisfaction_on_each aspect $a$ of $i$ (i.e.,_*aspect_rating* $r_{u,i,a}$) and the importance of_each_aspect_(of $i$) to $u$ (i.e.,