 uniformly along the surface [@Smoluchowski1941], thus giving weak corrugation. The crude proposal (\[eq:4\]) might be viewed as the precursor to the effective-medium theory [@EMT].

![image](fig1CuContourPlots.png){width="85.00000%"}

The form (\[eq:4\]) provides an interpretation of the mechanism by which the increasing density corrugation for (111) $<$ (100) $<$ (110) causes increasing amplitudes of modulation $V_1(z)$ in the physisorption potentials. The min-to-max variation of the rotationally averaged, lateral periodic corrugation $V_1(z)$ is modeled with an amplitude function [@HarrisAndLiebsch1982b], like in Eq. (\[eq:2\]), $V_1(z) = V_1^\prime \exp(-\beta z)$. Here the exponent $\beta$ is related to the exponent $\alpha$ of $V_0(z)$ via $\beta = \alpha/2 + \sqrt{(\alpha/2)^2 + G_{10}^2}$. The strength prefactor $V_1^\prime$ is adjusted so that the calculated intensities of the first-order $\mathbf{G}_{10}$ diffraction beams agree with measured values.

The simple message of the experimental characterization in Figure \[fig:1\](a) is that, at the optimal separation and out, the $V_1$ corrugation terms are rather weak compared to the $V_0$ averages. This observation confirms that the basic particle-surface interaction is predominantly one dimensional.

![\[fig:1\] (a) Physisorption interaction potentials, $V$, for H$_2$ (D$_2$) on Cu(111) (circles), Cu(100) (squares), and Cu(110) (triangles), in the form of lateral average, $V_0(z)$ and corrugation $V_1(z)$. The potential functions $V_0$ and $V_1$ are defined in the text. The position $z$ of the molecular center of mass is here given with respect to the classical turning point, i.e. the position $z_t$ where a classical particle at energy $\epsilon_i = 0$ would be reflected in the potential. Adapted from [@andersson1993]. (b) The corresponding PECs calculated with vdW-DF2
uniformly along the surface [ @Smoluchowski1941 ], thus giving weak corrugation. The unrefined marriage proposal (\[eq:4\ ]) might be viewed as the precursor to the effective - culture medium hypothesis [ @EMT ]. 

! [ image](fig1CuContourPlots.png){width="85.00000% " } 

 The form (\[eq:4\ ]) provides an interpretation of the mechanism by which the increase density corrugation for (111) $ < $ (100) $ < $ (110) causes increase amplitudes of modulation $ V_1(z)$ in the physisorption electric potential. The min - to - max magnetic declination of the rotationally average, lateral periodic corrugation $ V_1(z)$ is modeled with an amplitude function [ @HarrisAndLiebsch1982b ], like in Eq.   (\[eq:2\ ]), $ V_1(z) = V_1^\prime \exp(-\beta z)$. Here the exponent $ \beta$ is related to the exponent $ \alpha$ of $ V_0(z)$ via $ \beta = \alpha/2 + \sqrt{(\alpha/2)^2 + G_{10}^2}$. The military capability prefactor $ V_1^\prime$ is adjusted so that the calculated intensities of the beginning - order $ \mathbf{G}_{10}$ diffraction beams agree with measured value. 

 The simple message of the experimental characterization in Figure \[fig:1\](a) is that, at the optimal separation and out, the $ V_1 $ corrugation price are rather weak compared to the $ V_0 $ averages. This observation confirm that the basic atom - surface interaction is predominantly one dimensional. 

! [ \[fig:1\ ] (a) Physisorption interaction potentials, $ V$, for H$_2 $ (D$_2 $) on Cu(111) (circles), Cu(100) (squares), and Cu(110) (triangles), in the form of lateral average, $ V_0(z)$ and corrugation $ V_1(z)$. The potential routine $ V_0 $ and $ V_1 $ are specify in the text. The position $ z$ of the molecular plaza of mass is here given with respect to the classical turn point, i.e. the stead $ z_t$ where a classical particle at department of energy $ \epsilon_i = 0 $ would be reflected in the potential. Adapted from [ @andersson1993 ]. (b) The corresponding PECs calculated with vdW - DF2
 unlformly along the surfact [@Smoluchowski1941], thos givinj weak dorrugatkon. The crude proposal (\[eq:4\]) mijht ve vitced as the precursor to the evfective-nedinm theory [@EMT].

![imajs](fig1CuContourLpots.'nj){width="85.00000%"}

The form (\[gq:4\]) provides dn interpretathov lf the mechanism by which the increwsing drndity corrugatijn fpw (111) $<$ (100) $<$ (110) causes increasing amplitudes of modulauion $V_1(z)$ in the phyxisorption potentials. The lin-tl-max variation of hhe rotatioballr averaged, lageral periodic corrugajion $V_1(z)$ is modeled with an ampligude yunction [@HatxusAjgLiebsch1982b], lmke in Eq. (\[eq:2\]), $V_1(z) = V_1^\pvpme \exp(-\teta z)$. Nere the exponcnt $\bxta$ us related to the expmnent $\alpha$ of $V_0(z)$ dia $\beta = \ampha/2 + \sqrt{(\alpha/2)^2 + T_{10}^2}$. Rhe sjrengdh pfwfaztod $T_1^\prjme$ is adousted so tgat the calxulated intensities os the first-ordsr $\matrbs{G}_{10}$ diffraction beams agree with measureg vzlues.

The simple message of the experimental fharacteryzation in Figure \[fig:1\](a) is that, at the optimal sepdratikv aue out, rhf $V_1$ corrugation terms are rather weak compareq tp nhe $V_0$ averages. Thls observation congigmx that the baskc parcjcme-surface interactlon is kredomunantly oge domensional.

![\[fig:1\] (a) Physisorptiin interactijb potentials, $V$, for H$_2$ (D$_2$) on Cu(111) (eirclex), Cu(100) (xquares), and Cu(110) (triangler), in the form ov lateral xverage, $V_0(z)$ and currlgathon $V_1(z)$. The potential functyons $V_0$ anv $V_1$ axe defindd im the eext. The plsition $z$ of the moleculwr ceuter mf mass is here given with respect to the classical turmitg ioint, i.e. che poxition $z_t$ whewe a classical particje at energy $\epailon_i = 0$ would be weflected in dje potential. Adapted fron [@aneersson1993]. (c) The correspomding PECs calculatwd with vdW-DF2
uniformly along the surface [@Smoluchowski1941], thus giving The proposal (\[eq:4\]) be viewed as theory ![image](fig1CuContourPlots.png){width="85.00000%"} The form provides an interpretation the mechanism by which the increasing corrugation for (111) $<$ (100) $<$ (110) causes increasing amplitudes of modulation $V_1(z)$ the physisorption potentials. The min-to-max variation of the rotationally averaged, lateral periodic corrugation is with amplitude [@HarrisAndLiebsch1982b], like in Eq. (\[eq:2\]), $V_1(z) = V_1^\prime \exp(-\beta z)$. Here the exponent $\beta$ is related the exponent $\alpha$ of $V_0(z)$ via $\beta = + \sqrt{(\alpha/2)^2 + G_{10}^2}$. strength prefactor $V_1^\prime$ is adjusted that calculated intensities the $\mathbf{G}_{10}$ beams agree with values. The simple message of the experimental characterization in Figure \[fig:1\](a) is that, at the optimal separation out, the terms are weak to $V_0$ averages. This that the basic particle-surface interaction is ![\[fig:1\] (a) Physisorption interaction potentials, $V$, for H$_2$ on Cu(111) Cu(100) (squares), and Cu(110) (triangles), in form of lateral average, $V_0(z)$ and corrugation $V_1(z)$. potential functions $V_0$ and $V_1$ are defined in the text. The position $z$ of the of mass is here with respect to classical point, the $z_t$ where classical particle at energy $\epsilon_i = 0$ would be reflected in potential. Adapted from [@andersson1993]. (b) The corresponding PECs calculated with
 uniformly along the surface [@SMoluchowskI1941], thus GivIng WeAk coRrugAtion. The crude pROposAl (\[eq:4\]) might be viewed as the PrecuRsOR to tHE eFfectIve-mediUM tHEOry [@eMt].

![iMagE](fIG1CUContOurplots.pnG){width="85.00000%"}

The fOrm (\[Eq:4\]) Provides an inTErPretation oF thE mechanism by WhiCh the iNcReaSIng deNsiTy corRugatiON for (111) $<$ (100) $<$ (110) caUses increAsINg amplITudes of MODuLatiOn $V_1(z)$ in the physisorPTiON potentials. The Min-to-mAx VArIATioN of The rotatioNaLly avERaged, laTErAL PEriODic corrugatioN $V_1(z)$ is modeleD WitH an ampLiTudE FunctiOn [@HarRiSandliebsch1982b], likE in EQ. (\[eq:2\]), $V_1(z) = V_1^\priMe \exp(-\bETa z)$. Here THe exponEnt $\betA$ is RelAted TO tHe ExpOnENt $\aLPhA$ of $v_0(Z)$ viA $\beta = \alpHa/2 + \SqRt{(\alpHa/2)^2 + G_{10}^2}$. THE STRengTh pRefaCtor $V_1^\Prime$ is adjustEd sO thaT The CalcuLated InteNsIties Of the fIrst-oRdEr $\mathbf{G}_{10}$ diffraCtioN beams agrEe wItH meAsUred vALues.

ThE siMplE messagE of the eXPerImENTAl Characterization in fiGURe \[Fig:1\](a) is thAt, at thE OpTiMAl separaTiOn aNd ouT, THe $V_1$ coRrugATiOn terms aRe rathER wEaK comparEd To the $V_0$ AvEraGes. this oBServAtion cOnfirms tHat thE Basic particle-sURface interactIOn IS PrEDomiNanTly one dimenSionAL.

![\[fig:1\] (A) PhySIsOrpTIon inTeracTiON pOTentials, $V$, for H$_2$ (D$_2$) on Cu(111) (cIrCles), Cu(100) (SquarEs), and Cu(110) (triangLes), in the foRM OF lateral AverAGe, $v_0(Z)$ and corrugatioN $V_1(z)$. ThE potential FUnctions $v_0$ and $V_1$ Are definEd in the teXT. the positIon $Z$ of The MolECUlAr center of masS IS herE gIven witH reSpect to The ClaSsiCal TuRning poinT, i.e. the poSiTiOn $Z_t$ WheRe a clASsical paRtIclE aT enErgy $\ePSilon_i = 0$ Would Be reFlEcTEd iN the potENtIAL. AdaPtEd From [@AndErSson1993]. (b) the cORreSpondinG PECs calcUlaTEd wiTh Vdw-DF2
 uniformly along the surfa ce [@Smolu chows ki1 941 ],  thu s gi ving weak corr u gati on. The crude proposal  (\[e q: 4 \])m ig ht be  viewed as t hepr ec urs or to  theeff ective- medium the ory  [ @EMT].

![im a ge ](fig1CuCo nto urPlots.png) {wi dth="8 5. 000 0 0%"}
Th e for m (\[e q :4\])providesan interp r etation o fthemechanism by whic h  t h e increasing d ensity  c o rr u g ati onfor (111)$< $ (10 0 ) $<$ ( 1 10 ) c aus e s increasingamplitudeso f m odulat io n $ V _1(z)$  in t he phy sisorptionpote ntials. T he min - to-maxv ariatio n of t herot atio n al ly  av er a ged ,  l ate r alperiodic  c or rugat ion$ V _ 1 (z)$  is  mod eledwith an ampli tud e fu n cti on [@ Harri sAnd Li ebsch 1982b] , lik ein Eq. (\[eq:2\ ]),$V_1(z) =  V_ 1^ \pr im e \ex p (-\bet a z )$.  Here t he expo n ent  $ \ b e ta $ is related to th ee x po nent $\a lpha$o f$V _ 0(z)$ vi a$\b eta= \alph a/2+  \ sqrt{(\a lpha/2 ) ^2  +  G_{10} ^2 }$. Th estr eng th pr e fact or $V_ 1^\prime $ isa djusted so tha t  the calculat e di n te n siti esof the firs t-or d er $ \mat h bf {G} _ {10}$  diff ra c ti o n beams agree withme asured  valu es.

The simp le message o f  the exp erim e nt a l characteriza tionin Figure\ [fig:1\] (a) i s that,at the op t i mal sepa rat ion  an d o u t ,the $V_1$ cor r u gati on  termsare  rather  we akcom par ed  to the $ V_0$ ave ra ge s.  T his  obse r vation c on fir ms  th at th e  basic  part icle -s ur f ace  intera c ti o n  ispr ed omin ant ly  onedime n sio nal.

! [\[fig:1\ ] ( a ) Ph ys is orption  interactionpo tentials,$V $,for H$ _ 2 $ (D$_2$ ) on Cu(111) (circles), Cu(100)  (s quare s),and Cu(11 0)(trian gle s ), inthe fo rm of  l ate r a l ave r a ge , $ V_ 0(z)$ andc o rru gatio n$V_1 (z)$. T he potential funct i ons  $V_0$ and $V _1$  are d ef ine d  i n  th et ext . The position $z $ of the m ol e cu lar center ofma ss is h ere giv en wi t h respe ct to the  classica lturn i n g p oint, i.e.  the pos ition $z_ t $ whe r ea cla ssi cal pa rt icl e atenergy $\e psilo n_i =0$  would  be r ef lected i n the potential. Adapte d from  [@an der sson1993] . ( b ) T he corres pond ing PECs c alc ula ted w ith vdW-D F2
 uniformly_along the_surface [@Smoluchowski1941], thus giving_weak corrugation._The_crude proposal_(\[eq:4\])_might be viewed_as the precursor_to the effective-medium theory_[@EMT].

![image](fig1CuContourPlots.png){width="85.00000%"}

The form (\[eq:4\])_provides_an interpretation of the mechanism by which the increasing density corrugation for (111) $<$_(100)_$<$ (110)_causes_increasing_amplitudes of modulation $V_1(z)$ in_the physisorption potentials. The min-to-max_variation of_the rotationally averaged, lateral periodic corrugation $V_1(z)$ is_modeled_with an amplitude_function [@HarrisAndLiebsch1982b], like in Eq. (\[eq:2\]), $V_1(z) = V_1^\prime \exp(-\beta_z)$. Here the exponent $\beta$ is_related to the_exponent_$\alpha$_of $V_0(z)$ via $\beta_= \alpha/2 + \sqrt{(\alpha/2)^2 + G_{10}^2}$._The strength prefactor $V_1^\prime$ is adjusted_so that the calculated intensities of the_first-order $\mathbf{G}_{10}$ diffraction beams agree with_measured values.

The simple message of_the experimental_characterization in Figure \[fig:1\](a) is_that, at the_optimal separation_and out, the_$V_1$ corrugation terms are rather weak_compared to the_$V_0$ averages. This observation confirms that_the_basic particle-surface interaction_is_predominantly_one dimensional.

![\[fig:1\]_(a) Physisorption interaction_potentials,_$V$, for_H$_2$_(D$_2$) on Cu(111) (circles), Cu(100) (squares),_and_Cu(110) (triangles), in the form of lateral_average, $V_0(z)$ and corrugation_$V_1(z)$._The potential functions $V_0$_and $V_1$ are defined in_the text. The position $z$ of_the molecular_center of_mass is here given with respect to the classical turning point,_i.e. the position $z_t$ where a_classical particle at energy_$\epsilon_i =_0$_would be reflected_in_the potential._Adapted from [@andersson1993]. (b) The corresponding PECs_calculated with_vdW-DF2