1+c)}} \;,$$ instead of collapsing, the shell starts to expand. Thus all trajectories can be divided to two categories: The ones where the shell starts to collapse, and the ones where the shell starts to expand at its turning point $r_0$.

Next question then is, what happens to the shell after its initial turning point? Is there another turning point, or will the shell always either collapse to a black hole or expand all the way to the boundary? The EOM cannot be solved analytically for turning points for general values of $n$ and $c$. When investigating the solutions numerically, it turns out that both kinds of behaviour are present. Thus the solutions can be divided into two additional categories: The ones which have only a single turning point, and the ones which have more. Thus we have four general categories of solutions, illustrated in figure \[fig:rsdotfig\]:

1.  Shell collapses to a black hole (solid line)

2.  Shell starts to collapse, but has a turning point at smaller radius (dotted line)

3.  Shell starts to expand, but has a turning point at a greater radius (small dashed line)

4.  Shell expands all the way to the boundary (large dashed line)

In case 1, the expression in equation (\[eq:rsdot2\]) has only a single root. For case 2, the expression has three roots, however, since the initial condition is given at $r_0$, the smallest root is never reached, and the shell ends up oscillating between the $r_0$ and the middle root. For case 3 the expression has again three roots, and now the shell oscillates between $r_0$ and the largest root. For case 4, the the expression has two roots, but the smaller one is never reached, and instead the shell starts and continues to expand from $r_0$ towards infinity.

![The speed squared of the thin shell for different equations of state. Solid line $c=0.328$, the dotted line $c=0.33$, the small dashed line $c=0.3323$ and the large dashed line $c=0.3334$. The divergence of the velocity at $r_h$ is a sign of a coordinate singularity at the horizon. The other parameters have been chosen to be $m=5$, $\Lambda=1$, $r_0=10$. []{data-label="fig
1+c) } } \;,$$ instead of collapsing, the shell starts to elaborate. therefore all trajectories can be divided to two class: The one where the shell starts to break down, and the ones where the shell start to expand at its turning compass point $ r_0$. 

 Next question then is, what happen to the shell after its initial turning point? Is there another turning point, or will the shell constantly either collapse to a black hole or extend all the way to the boundary? The EOM cannot be solved analytically for turning point for general values of $ n$ and $ c$. When investigating the solutions numerically, it turns out that both kind of behaviour are present. Thus the solutions can be divided into two additional categories: The one which have only a single turning point, and the ones which have more. Thus we have four general class of solutions, illustrated in name \[fig: rsdotfig\ ]: 

 1.   Shell collapse to a black hole (solid line) 

 2.   Shell starts to collapse, but has a turn point at smaller radius (dotted line) 

 3.   Shell starts to expand, but has a turning point at a greater radius (belittled dashed note) 

 4.   Shell expands all the way to the boundary (large dashed lineage) 

 In case 1, the expression in equation (\[eq: rsdot2\ ]) take entirely a single root. For character 2, the expression have three roots, however, since the initial circumstance is given at $ r_0 $, the smallest root is never reached, and the carapace ends up oscillate between the $ r_0 $ and the middle root. For case 3 the expression has again three root, and now the shell oscillates between $ r_0 $ and the largest root. For case 4, the the expression has two roots, but the smaller one is never reach, and instead the shell get down and continues to expand from $ r_0 $ towards infinity. 

! [ The speed squared of the thin plate for different equations of state. Solid line $ c=0.328 $, the dotted argumentation $ c=0.33 $, the humble daunt line $ c=0.3323 $ and the large dashed line $ c=0.3334$. The divergence of the velocity at $ r_h$ is a signal of a coordinate singularity at the horizon. The other parameters have been chosen to be $ m=5 $, $ \Lambda=1 $, $ r_0=10$. [ ] { datum - label="fig
1+c)}} \;,$$ lnstead of collapsing, tht shell starts to expand. Thus zll trajdctories can be divided to txo cqtegoeies: The ones where thd shell snarts to xollepse, and the ones where bke shspl scacts to expand aj its turninc point $r_0$.

Next xudscion then is, what happens to the shejl aftet lts initial tutning [oinf? Is there another turning point, od will uhe shell always eother collapse to a black jole or expand all the way to the bougeary? The EOM cannot be solved analitically for turning points for eenercl values od $b$ ajg $c$. When intestigwting the solutions tumericslly, it turns put thqt both kinds of behatiour are present. Thos the solgtnons can be divided ibti two addhtiovql zattgociea: The lnea which habe only a sungle turning point, age the ones whjch hade more. Thus we have four general categorpes kf solutions, illustratee in figure \[fig:rsdotflg\]:

1.  Shell collapses to a black hole (solid line)

2.  Shell stards to zoloaise, cyt has a turning point at smaller radius (dotted mime)

3.  Shell starts to expand, nuh nws a turning koint ac a greater radius (smwll dasred lune)

4.  Shelj exlands all the way to the boyndary (large eashed line)

In case 1, the exprersiom in rquation (\[eq:rsdot2\]) has onuy a single rooh. For cass 2, the expression hax dhree roots, however, since ehe initiel coudition ks goven ae $r_0$, the smwllesb root is never reafhed, cnd tve shell ejds up oscillating between the $c_0$ and the midcla rmot. For ease 3 bhe expression ras again threg roots, aud now the shell oscilletes between $r_0$ and the lashest root. Foc case 4, tre tye ezpressiuv has two rootx, but the smaller obe is never reachev, ana instead the shzuo starts and comtivuef no xxpanq from $r_0$ towasds knfkmity.

![Tfe speed sqmardd og the thin shell for difrerent equations og ftate. Sooid line $c=0.328$, the dotted line $c=0.33$, the small fashev line $c=0.3323$ anc tre large dashed line $c=0.3334$. The divsrgence ov tme velocity ae $r_h$ is a sign oy a coordinate singularity at the horizoi. The other parameters yave been chosen to ne $m=5$, $\Lambda=1$, $c_0=10$. []{data-jabel="fig
1+c)}} \;,$$ instead of collapsing, the shell expand. all trajectories be divided to the starts to collapse, the ones where shell starts to expand at its point $r_0$. Next question then is, what happens to the shell after its turning point? Is there another turning point, or will the shell always either to black or all the way to the boundary? The EOM cannot be solved analytically for turning points for values of $n$ and $c$. When investigating the numerically, it turns out both kinds of behaviour are Thus solutions can divided two categories: The ones have only a single turning point, and the ones which have more. Thus we have four general of solutions, figure \[fig:rsdotfig\]: Shell to black hole (solid Shell starts to collapse, but has at smaller radius (dotted line) 3. Shell starts expand, but a turning point at a greater (small dashed line) 4. Shell expands all the to the boundary (large dashed line) In case 1, the expression in equation (\[eq:rsdot2\]) has single root. For case the expression has roots, since initial is given $r_0$, the smallest root is never reached, and the shell ends oscillating between the $r_0$ and the middle root. For case expression again three roots, now the shell oscillates $r_0$ the largest root. For the expression but smaller is never reached, and the shell starts and continues expand from $r_0$ towards the thin shell for different equations of state. line $c=0.328$, the dotted line $c=0.33$, the dashed line $c=0.3323$ and the large dashed line $c=0.3334$. The divergence of velocity at a sign of a coordinate singularity at the The other parameters have chosen to be $m=5$, $\Lambda=1$, $r_0=10$. []{data-label="fig
1+c)}} \;,$$ instead of collapsing, the shEll starts tO expaNd. THus AlL traJectOries can be diviDEd to Two categories: The ones whEre thE sHEll sTArTs to cOllapse, ANd THE onEs WhEre ThE ShEll stArtS to expaNd at its turNinG pOint $r_0$.

Next queSTiOn then is, whAt hAppens to the sHelL after ItS inITial tUrnIng poInt? Is tHEre anoTher turniNg POint, or WIll the sHELl AlwaYs either collapse tO A bLAck hole or expanD all thE wAY tO THe bOunDary? The EOM CaNnot bE Solved aNAlYTICalLY for turning poInts for geneRAl vAlues oF $n$ And $C$. when inVestiGaTIng The solutionS numErically, iT turns OUt that bOTh kinds Of behaVioUr aRe prESeNt. thuS tHE soLUtIonS Can Be divideD iNtO two aDditIONAL catEgoRies: the onEs which have onLy a SingLE tuRning Point, And tHe Ones wHich haVe morE. THus we have four geNeraL categoriEs oF sOluTiOns, ilLUstratEd iN fiGure \[fig:RsdotfiG\]:

1.  sheLl COLLaPses to a black hole (soLiD LInE)

2.  Shell stArts to COlLaPSe, but has A tUrnIng pOINt at sMallER rAdius (dotTed linE)

3.  shElL starts To Expand, BuT haS a tUrninG PoinT at a grEater radIus (smALl dashed line)

4.  ShELl expands all tHE wAY To THe boUndAry (large dasHed lINe)

In Case 1, THe ExpREssioN in eqUaTIoN (\[Eq:rsdot2\]) has only a singLe Root. FoR case 2, The expression Has three roOTS, However, sInce THe INitial conditioN is giVen at $r_0$, the sMAllest roOt is nEver reacHed, and the SHEll ends uP osCilLatIng BETwEen the $r_0$ and the MIDdle RoOt. For caSe 3 tHe expreSsiOn hAs aGaiN tHree roots, And now thE sHeLl OsCilLates BEtween $r_0$ aNd The LaRgeSt rooT. for casE 4, the tHe exPrEsSIon Has two rOOtS, BUt thE sMaLler One Is Never ReacHEd, aNd insteAd the shelL stARts aNd CoNtinues To expand from $r_0$ ToWards infinItY.

![ThE speed SQUared of tHe thin shell for different EQuationS of State. soliD line $c=0.328$, the DotTed linE $c=0.33$, tHE small Dashed Line $c=0.3323$ AnD thE LArge dASHeD liNe $C=0.3334$. The divergENCe oF the vElOcitY at $r_h$ is A sign of a coordinate SIngUlarity at the hOriZon. THE OtHer PArAMetErS HavE BEen chosen to be $m=5$, $\LAmbda=1$, $r_0=10$. []{data-LaBEl="Fig
1+c)}} \;,$$ instead of co llapsing,the s hel l s ta rtsto e xpand. Thus al l  tra jectories can be divid ed to  t w o ca t eg ories : The o n es w her eth e s he l lstart s t o colla pse, and t heon es where the sh ell starts  to  expand at i tsturnin gpoi n t $r_ 0$. 

Nex t ques t ion th en is, wh at happen s  to the s he ll a fter its initialt ur n ing point? Istherean o th e r  tu rni ng point,or  will the she l la l w ays either collap se to a bla c k h ole or  e xpa n d allthe w ay tothe boundar y? T he EOM ca nnot b e  solved analyti callyfor  tu rnin g  p oi nts  f o r g e ne ral val ues of $ n$  a nd $c $. W h e n inve sti gati ng th e solutions n ume rica l ly,  it t urnsoutth at bo th kin ds of  b ehaviour are pr esen t. Thus t heso lut io ns ca n  be di vid edinto tw o addit i ona lc a t eg ories: The ones wh ic h ha ve onlya sing l etu r ning poi nt , a nd t h e  ones  whi c hhave mor e. Thu s  w ehave fo ur  gener al  ca teg ories of s olutio ns, illu strat e d in figure \[ f ig:rsdotfig\] : 
1 .  S hell  co llapses toa bl a ck h ole( so lid line) 

2. S h el l  starts to collapse ,but ha s a t urning pointat smaller r a dius (do tted li n e)

3.  Shellstart s to expan d , but ha s a t urning p oint at a g reater r adi us(sm all d as hed line)

4. Shel lexpands  al l the w aytothe  bo un dary (lar ge dashe dli ne )
In  case 1, the e xp res si onin eq u ation(\[eq :rsd ot 2\ ] ) h as only as i ngle  r oo t. F orca se 2,  the exp ression  has thre e r o ots,  h ow ever, s ince the init ia l conditio nisgivena t  $r_0$,the smallest root is ne v er reac hed , and  the  shell en dsup osc ill a ting b etween  the$r _0$ a nd th e mi ddl eroot. Forc a se3 the  e xpre ssion h as again three roo t s,and now the s hel l os c i ll ate s  b e twe en $r_ 0 $  and the larges t root. Fo rc as e 4, the t h e e xp ression  has tw o roo t s, butthe small er one is  n ever r eac hed, and i nstead t he shells tarts an d con tin ues to  e xpa nd fr om $r_ 0 $ t oward s infi ni ty.

! [Thesp eed squa red of the thin shell f or dif feren t e quationsofs tat e. Solidline  $c=0.328$ , t hedotte d l i ne $c =0.3 3 $,  th e  smal l da s hed line$ c= 0.3 3 2 3$  and the la r g e  da shedlin e  $c=0. 3334 $. The divergence of the velocit y at $ r_h $ i s  a s ig n of a coordin ate  s i n gularity  a t the horiz on. Theot h er pa ramete rs hav e beenc h os e n to b e $m =5$ , $\Lambd a=1 $, $r_0=10 $.  [ ] {data- labe l= "fig
1+c)}} \;,$$_instead of_collapsing, the shell starts_to expand._Thus_all trajectories_can_be divided to_two categories: The_ones where the shell_starts to collapse,_and_the ones where the shell starts to expand at its turning point $r_0$.

Next question_then_is, what_happens_to_the shell after its initial_turning point? Is there another_turning point,_or will the shell always either collapse to_a_black hole or_expand all the way to the boundary? The EOM_cannot be solved analytically for turning_points for general_values_of_$n$ and $c$. When_investigating the solutions numerically, it turns_out that both kinds of behaviour_are present. Thus the solutions can be_divided into two additional categories: The_ones which have only a_single turning_point, and the ones which_have more. Thus_we have_four general categories_of solutions, illustrated in figure \[fig:rsdotfig\]:

1._ Shell collapses_to a black hole (solid line)

2.__Shell starts to_collapse,_but_has a_turning point at_smaller_radius (dotted_line)

3._ Shell starts to expand, but_has_a turning point at a greater radius_(small dashed line)

4. _Shell_expands all the way_to the boundary (large dashed_line)

In case 1, the expression in_equation (\[eq:rsdot2\])_has only_a single root. For case 2, the expression has three roots,_however, since the initial condition is_given at $r_0$, the_smallest root_is_never reached, and_the_shell ends_up oscillating between the $r_0$ and the_middle root._For case 3 the expression has_again three roots, and_now_the shell oscillates between $r_0$ and_the largest root. For case 4,_the the expression has two_roots,_but_the smaller one is never_reached, and instead the shell starts_and continues to_expand from $r_0$ towards infinity.

![The speed squared_of_the thin shell for different equations_of_state. Solid line $c=0.328$, the dotted_line_$c=0.33$,_the small dashed line $c=0.3323$_and the large dashed line $c=0.3334$._The divergence of the velocity at $r_h$ is a_sign of a_coordinate singularity at the horizon._The_other_parameters have been chosen to be $m=5$, $\Lambda=1$, $r_0=10$. []{data-label="fig