(E_1)=m(E_0)\otimes m(\ker A)^*$).

Let us consider an example when $M_0=CP^n$. For every $k\in{\bf Z}$ we construct a line bundle $\alpha _k$ over $CP^n$ in the following way. We define the total space $E_k$ of the bundle $\alpha _k$ taking quotient of ${\bf C}^{n+2}\setminus \{ 0\} $ with respect to equivalence relation $$(z_1,...,z_{n+2})\sim (\lambda z_1,...,\lambda z_{n+1}, \lambda ^kz_{n+2}).$$ The projection map $E_k\rightarrow CP^n$ is induced by the map $(z_1,...,z_{n+1},z_{n+2})\rightarrow (z_1,...,z_{n+1})$. The $(n|1)$-dimensional complex supermanifold $M_k$ corresponding to the line bundle $\alpha _k$, can be obtained from superspace $({\bf
C}^{n+1}\setminus \{ 0\} )\times {\bf C}^{0|1}$ by means of identification $$(z_1,...,z_{n+1},\theta)\sim (\lambda z_1,...,\lambda z_{n+1}, \lambda
^k\theta),\  \   \   \lambda \in {\bf C}.$$ (here $z_1,...,z_{n+1}$ are even coordinates is ${\bf C}^{n+1|1},\theta$ is an odd coordinate). To give another description of the supermanifold $M_k$ we consider a hypersurface $N_k\subset {\bf C}^{n+1|1}$, determined by the equation $$\bar {z}_1z_1+...+\bar {z}_{n+1}z_{n+1}+k\bar {\theta}\theta=c,\  \  \
c>0.$$ The restriction of standard symplectic form $\omega$ on ${\bf
C}^{n+1|1}$ to the hypersurface $N_k$ is a degenerate closed $2$-form. One can factorize $N_k$ with respect to null-vectors of this $2$-form; it is easy to check that this factorization leads to identification of points of $N_k$ given by the formula (3) with $|\lambda|=1$. This means that a manifold obtained
( E_1)=m(E_0)\otimes m(\ker A)^*$). 

 Let us consider an example when $ M_0 = CP^n$. For every $ k\in{\bf Z}$ we construct a course package $ \alpha _ k$ over $ CP^n$ in the following way. We define the full space $ E_k$ of the bundle $ \alpha _ k$ take quotient of $ { \bf C}^{n+2}\setminus \ { 0\ } $ with respect to equivalence sexual intercourse $ $ (z_1,... ,z_{n+2})\sim (\lambda z_1,... ,\lambda z_{n+1 }, \lambda ^kz_{n+2}).$$ The projection map $ E_k\rightarrow CP^n$ is induce by the map $ (z_1,... ,z_{n+1},z_{n+2})\rightarrow (z_1,... ,z_{n+1})$. The $ (n|1)$-dimensional complex supermanifold $ M_k$ equate to the lineage bundle $ \alpha _ k$, can be obtained from superspace $ ({ \bf 
 C}^{n+1}\setminus \ { 0\ }) \times { \bf C}^{0|1}$ by means of identification $ $ (z_1,... ,z_{n+1},\theta)\sim (\lambda z_1,... ,\lambda z_{n+1 }, \lambda 
 ^k\theta),\   \    \    \lambda \in { \bf C}.$$ (here $ z_1,... ,z_{n+1}$ are even coordinates is $ { \bf C}^{n+1|1},\theta$ is an curious coordinate). To give another description of the supermanifold $ M_k$ we consider a hypersurface $ N_k\subset { \bf C}^{n+1|1}$, determined by the equality $ $ \bar { z}_1z_1+... +\bar { z}_{n+1}z_{n+1}+k\bar { \theta}\theta = c,\   \   \ 
 c>0.$$ The restriction of standard symplectic form $ \omega$ on $ { \bf 
 C}^{n+1|1}$ to the hypersurface $ N_k$ is a pervert closed $ 2$-form. One can factorize $ N_k$ with esteem to null - vectors of this $ 2$-form; it is easy to check that this factorization leads to designation of points of $ N_k$ given by the formula (3) with $ |\lambda|=1$. This means that a manifold obtained
(E_1)=m(E_0)\ltimes m(\ker A)^*$).

Let us conslder an example cyen $M_0=C'^n$. For svery $k\iv{\bf Z}$ we construct a line buidle $\alphq _k$ over $CP^n$ in the foulowing wwy. We dedine rhe total space $E_k$ of ths bunblx $\alpha _k$ takinn quotient mf ${\bf C}^{n+2}\setmings \{ 0\} $ with respect to equivalence relatyon $$(z_1,...,z_{n+2})\xil (\lambda z_1,...,\lambqa z_{m+1}, \lamgda ^kz_{n+2}).$$ The projection map $E_k\rightzrrow CK^n$ is induced by tne map $(z_1,...,z_{n+1},z_{n+2})\rightarrow (z_1,...,z_{n+1})$. The $(n|1)$-dimensional comppex supermabifoje $M_k$ correspunding to uhz line bundme $\alpha _k$, can be obtained from supexspace $({\bf
C}^{n+1}\wermijos \{ 0\} )\times {\bh C}^{0|1}$ by means of idcmtificdtion $$(z_1,...,a_{n+1},\theta)\sim (\lamnda z_1,...,\namvda z_{n+1}, \lambda
^k\theta),\  \   \   \lambda \in {\bf C}.$$ (here $z_1,...,s_{n+1}$ are even coordinqtws is ${\bf W}^{n+1|1},\thdra$ ks zn osd coogdiiate). To givs another dwscription of the sipqgkanifold $M_k$ se confiqer a hypersurface $N_k\subset {\bf C}^{n+1|1}$, deterkinsd by the equation $$\bar {z}_1z_1+...+\bar {z}_{n+1}z_{n+1}+k\bar {\theta}\tjeta=c,\  \  \
s>0.$$ The restriction of standard symplectic form $\omeca$ on ${\cf
C}^{u+1|1}$ to tfw jypersurface $N_k$ is a degenerate closed $2$-form. Ogs vak factorize $N_k$ wlth respect to nulk-vfcyjrs of this $2$-furm; it is easy to check thah this sactoeization jeadx to identification of poinrs of $N_k$ givvn bt the formula (3) witk $|\lambda|=1$. Thir mesns tnat a manifold obtained
(E_1)=m(E_0)\otimes m(\ker A)^*$). Let us consider an $M_0=CP^n$. every $k\in{\bf we construct a $CP^n$ the following way. define the total $E_k$ of the bundle $\alpha _k$ quotient of ${\bf C}^{n+2}\setminus \{ 0\} $ with respect to equivalence relation $$(z_1,...,z_{n+2})\sim z_1,...,\lambda z_{n+1}, \lambda ^kz_{n+2}).$$ The projection map $E_k\rightarrow CP^n$ is induced by the $(z_1,...,z_{n+1},z_{n+2})\rightarrow The complex $M_k$ corresponding to the line bundle $\alpha _k$, can be obtained from superspace $({\bf C}^{n+1}\setminus \{ )\times {\bf C}^{0|1}$ by means of identification $$(z_1,...,z_{n+1},\theta)\sim z_1,...,\lambda z_{n+1}, \lambda ^k\theta),\ \ \lambda \in {\bf C}.$$ $z_1,...,z_{n+1}$ even coordinates ${\bf is odd coordinate). To another description of the supermanifold $M_k$ we consider a hypersurface $N_k\subset {\bf C}^{n+1|1}$, determined by the equation {z}_1z_1+...+\bar {z}_{n+1}z_{n+1}+k\bar \ c>0.$$ restriction standard form $\omega$ on to the hypersurface $N_k$ is a One can factorize $N_k$ with respect to null-vectors this $2$-form; is easy to check that this leads to identification of points of $N_k$ given the formula (3) with $|\lambda|=1$. This means that a manifold obtained
(E_1)=m(E_0)\otimes m(\ker A)^*$).

Let us considEr an examplE when $m_0=CP^N$. FoR eVery $K\in{\bF Z}$ we construct a LIne bUndle $\alpha _k$ over $CP^n$ in thE follOwINg waY. we DefinE the totAL sPACe $E_K$ oF tHe bUnDLe $\Alpha _K$ taKing quoTient of ${\bf C}^{N+2}\seTmInus \{ 0\} $ with respECt To equivaleNce Relation $$(z_1,...,z_{n+2})\sIm (\lAmbda z_1,...,\LaMbdA Z_{n+1}, \lamBda ^Kz_{n+2}).$$ ThE projeCTion maP $E_k\rightaRrOW CP^n$ is INduced bY THe Map $(z_1,...,Z_{n+1},z_{n+2})\rightarrow (z_1,...,z_{n+1})$. tHe $(N|1)$-Dimensional comPlex suPeRMaNIFolD $M_k$ CorrespondInG to thE Line bunDLe $\ALPHa _k$, CAn be obtained fRom superspaCE $({\bf
c}^{n+1}\setmInUs \{ 0\} )\tIMes {\bf C}^{0|1}$ By meaNs OF idEntificatioN $$(z_1,...,z_{n+1},\Theta)\sim (\lAmbda z_1,...,\LAmbda z_{n+1}, \LAmbda
^k\tHeta),\  \   \   \laMbdA \in {\Bf C}.$$ (hERe $Z_1,...,z_{N+1}$ arE eVEn cOOrDinATes Is ${\bf C}^{n+1|1},\thEtA$ iS an odD cooRDINAte). TO giVe anOther Description of The SupeRManIfold $m_k$ we cOnsiDeR a hypErsurfAce $N_k\SuBset {\bf C}^{n+1|1}$, determiNed bY the equatIon $$\BaR {z}_1z_1+...+\BaR {z}_{n+1}z_{n+1}+K\Bar {\theTa}\tHetA=c,\  \  \
c>0.$$ The rEstrictIOn oF sTANDaRd symplectic form $\omEgA$ ON ${\bF
C}^{n+1|1}$ to the HypersURfAcE $n_k$ is a degEnEraTe clOSEd $2$-forM. One CAn FactorizE $N_k$ witH ReSpEct to nuLl-VectorS oF thIs $2$-fOrm; it IS easY to cheCk that thIs facTOrization leads TO identificatiON oF POiNTs of $n_k$ gIven by the foRmulA (3) With $|\LambDA|=1$. THis MEans tHat a mAnIFoLD obtained
(E_1)=m(E_0)\otimes m(\ker  A)^*$).
Let u s c ons id er a n ex ample when $M_ 0 =CP^ n$. For every $k\in{\b f Z}$  w e  con s tr uct a  line b u nd l e  $\ al ph a _ k$ ov er $C P^n $ in th e followin g w ay . We definet he  total spa ce$E_k$ of the  bu ndle $ \a lph a  _k$tak ing q uotien t  of ${ \bf C}^{n +2 } \setmi n us \{ 0 \ }  $  wit h respect to equi v al e nce relation $ $(z_1, .. . ,z _ { n+2 })\ sim (\lamb da  z_1, . ..,\lam b da z _ {n+ 1 }, \lambda ^k z_{n+2}).$$ The  proje ct ion map $E _k\ri gh t arr ow CP^n$ is  ind uced by t he map $(z_1,. . .,z_{n+ 1},z_{ n+2 })\ righ t ar ro w ( z_ 1 ,.. . ,z _{n + 1}) $. The $ (n |1 )$-di mens i o n a l co mpl ex s uperm anifold $M_k$  co rres p ond ing t o the  lin ebundl e $\al pha _ k$ , can be obtain ed f rom super spa ce  $( {\ bf
C} ^ {n+1}\ set min us \{ 0 \} )\ti m es{\ b f C} ^{0|1}$ by means o fi d en tificati on $$( z _1 ,. . .,z_{n+1 }, \th eta) \ s im (\ lamb d az_1,..., \lambd a  z _{ n+1}, \ la mbda
^ k\ the ta) ,\  \   \  \lam bda \in{\bfC }.$$ (here $z_ 1 ,...,z_{n+1}$ ar e ev e n co ord inates is $ {\bf C}^{ n+1| 1 }, \th e ta$ i s anod d  c o ordinate). To givean otherdescr iption of the  supermani f o l d $M_k$we c o ns i der a hypersur face$N_k\subse t  {\bf C} ^{n+1 |1}$, de terminedb y  the equ ati on$$\ bar { z} _1z_1+...+\ba r {z}_ {n +1}z_{n +1} +k\bar{\t het a}\ the ta =c,\  \ \
c>0.$$  T he  r es tri ction of stand ar d s ym ple cticf orm $\ omega $ on  $ {\ b f
C }^{n+1| 1 }$ t o th ehy pers urf ac e $N_ k$ i s  adegener ate close d $ 2 $-fo rm .One can  factorize $N _k $ with res pe ctto nul l - vectorsof this $2$-form; it is easy to  ch eck t hatthis fact ori zation  le a ds toidenti ficat io n o f point s of  $N _k $ given by t heformu la  (3)  with $ |\lambda|=1$. This mea ns that a man ifo ld o b t ai ned 
(E_1)=m(E_0)\otimes m(\ker_A)^*$).

Let us_consider an example when_$M_0=CP^n$. For_every_$k\in{\bf Z}$_we_construct a line_bundle $\alpha _k$_over $CP^n$ in the_following way. We_define_the total space $E_k$ of the bundle $\alpha _k$ taking quotient of ${\bf C}^{n+2}\setminus_\{_0\} $_with_respect_to equivalence relation $$(z_1,...,z_{n+2})\sim (\lambda_z_1,...,\lambda z_{n+1}, \lambda ^kz_{n+2}).$$ The_projection map_$E_k\rightarrow CP^n$ is induced by the map $(z_1,...,z_{n+1},z_{n+2})\rightarrow_(z_1,...,z_{n+1})$._The $(n|1)$-dimensional complex_supermanifold $M_k$ corresponding to the line bundle $\alpha _k$,_can be obtained from superspace $({\bf
C}^{n+1}\setminus_\{ 0\} )\times_{\bf_C}^{0|1}$_by means of identification_$$(z_1,...,z_{n+1},\theta)\sim (\lambda z_1,...,\lambda z_{n+1}, \lambda
^k\theta),\ _\   \  _\lambda \in {\bf C}.$$ (here $z_1,...,z_{n+1}$ are_even coordinates is ${\bf C}^{n+1|1},\theta$ is_an odd coordinate). To give_another description_of the supermanifold $M_k$ we_consider a hypersurface_$N_k\subset {\bf_C}^{n+1|1}$, determined by_the equation $$\bar {z}_1z_1+...+\bar {z}_{n+1}z_{n+1}+k\bar {\theta}\theta=c,\_ \ _\
c>0.$$ The restriction of standard symplectic_form_$\omega$ on ${\bf
C}^{n+1|1}$_to_the_hypersurface $N_k$_is a degenerate_closed_$2$-form. One_can_factorize $N_k$ with respect to null-vectors_of_this $2$-form; it is easy to check_that this factorization leads_to_identification of points of_$N_k$ given by the formula_(3) with $|\lambda|=1$. This means that_a manifold_obtained