alpha\neq 1$, $
    \log \mathcal{N}_I({\varepsilon},\mathscr{C},P)\leq L{\varepsilon}^{-\alpha}$. Then $$\begin{aligned}
    \sup_{C_0 \in \mathscr{C}} {\mathbb{E}}_{C_0} {\lvert\hat{C}_n\Delta C_0\rvert} \lesssim n^{-1/(\alpha+1)}.
    \end{aligned}$$

By [@yang1999information], the rate $n^{-1/(\alpha+1)}$ cannot be improved in a minimax sense if furthermore a lower bound on the metric entropy on the same order as that of the upper bound is available.

As a straightforward corollary of the above Theorem \[thm:rate\_optimal\_lse\_reg\], let $\mathscr{C}_d$ be the collection of all convex bodies contained in the unit ball in ${\mathbb{R}}^d$ and $P$ the uniform distribution on the unit ball.

Fix $d\geq 4$. Then $$\begin{aligned}
    \sup_{C_0 \in \mathscr{C}_d} {\mathbb{E}}_{C_0} {\lvert\hat{C}_n\Delta C_0\rvert} \lesssim n^{-2/(d+1)}.
    \end{aligned}$$

The claim essentially follows from Theorem 8.25 and Corollary 8.26 of [@dudley1999uniform], asserting that we can take $\alpha=(d-1)/2$ in Theorem \[thm:rate\_optimal\_lse\_reg\].

The corollary shows that we can use a global least squares estimator rather than a sieved least squares estimator (cf. [@brunel2013adaptive]) to achieve the optimal rate of convergence.

It is possible to impose certain tail conditions on the density of $P$ to extend the above corollary to a maximum risk bound over all convex sets in ${\mathbb{R}}^d$. A proof in this vein is carried out in the context of $s$-concave density estimation in ${\mathbb{R}}^d$ to be detailed below.

Before the proof of Theorem \[thm:rate\_optimal\_lse\_reg\], we need following:

\[lem:lse\_additive\_error\] Consider the regression model (\[eqn:reg\_model\]) and the least squares estimator $\hat{C}_n$ in (\[def:
alpha\neq 1 $, $ 
     \log \mathcal{N}_I({\varepsilon},\mathscr{C},P)\leq L{\varepsilon}^{-\alpha}$. Then $ $ \begin{aligned } 
     \sup_{C_0 \in \mathscr{C } } { \mathbb{E}}_{C_0 } { \lvert\hat{C}_n\Delta C_0\rvert } \lesssim n^{-1/(\alpha+1) }. 
     \end{aligned}$$ 

 By [ @yang1999information ], the rate $ n^{-1/(\alpha+1)}$ cannot be improved in a minimax sense if furthermore a lower bound on the measured information on the same order as that of the upper bounce is available. 

 As a aboveboard corollary of the above Theorem \[thm: rate\_optimal\_lse\_reg\ ], let $ \mathscr{C}_d$ be the collection of all convex torso contained in the unit musket ball in $ { \mathbb{R}}^d$ and $ P$ the uniform distribution on the unit testis. 

 Fix $ d\geq 4$. Then $ $ \begin{aligned } 
     \sup_{C_0 \in \mathscr{C}_d } { \mathbb{E}}_{C_0 } { \lvert\hat{C}_n\Delta C_0\rvert } \lesssim n^{-2/(d+1) }. 
     \end{aligned}$$ 

 The claim essentially follow from Theorem 8.25 and Corollary 8.26 of [ @dudley1999uniform ], asserting that we can take $ \alpha=(d-1)/2 $ in Theorem \[thm: rate\_optimal\_lse\_reg\ ]. 

 The corollary shows that we can use a global least squares calculator rather than a sieved least squares calculator (cf. [ @brunel2013adaptive ]) to achieve the optimal rate of convergence. 

 It is possible to enforce certain tail conditions on the density of $ P$ to extend the above corollary to a maximal risk bound over all convex sets in $ { \mathbb{R}}^d$. A proof in this vein is carried out in the context of $ s$-concave density estimate in $ { \mathbb{R}}^d$ to be detailed below. 

 Before the proof of Theorem \[thm: rate\_optimal\_lse\_reg\ ], we need following: 

 \[lem: lse\_additive\_error\ ] Consider the regression model (\[eqn: reg\_model\ ]) and the least squares estimator $ \hat{C}_n$ in (\[def:
alpja\neq 1$, $
    \log \mathcal{N}_I({\yarepsilon},\mathsct{C},P)\leq L{\tarepsimon}^{-\alpha}$. Then $$\begin{aligned}
    \sup_{C_0 \ii \marhscr{X}} {\mathbb{E}}_{C_0} {\lvert\hat{C}_n\Ddlta C_0\rvegt} \lesssin n^{-1/(\aopha+1)}.
    \end{emigned}$$

Bn [@yanf1999lnforketion], the rate $k^{-1/(\alpha+1)}$ cannmt be improved iv c minimax sense if furthermore a lowqr bounc ln the metric gntroky jn tgv wame order as that of the uppsr bounv is available.

Ax a straightforward corollwry lf the above Theorfm \[thm:rate\_okfimwo\_lse\_reg\], let $\oathscr{C}_d$ be the colledtion of all convex bodies contxined in the unut bapn in ${\mathbb{C}}^d$ and $P$ the unifovk distsibutiom on the unit nall.

Fmx $d\teq 4$. Then $$\begin{alignev}
    \sup_{C_0 \in \mathscr{S}_d} {\mathbb{A}}_{C_0} {\lvert\hat{C}_n\Delta X_0\rcert} \nessvim v^{-2/(e+1)}.
    \ehd{elifned}$$

Thf cmaim essenfially folliws from Theorem 8.25 amd Bprollary 8.26 of [@dudler1999ugiform], asserting that we can take $\alpha=(g-1)/2$ ih Theorem \[thm:rate\_optimao\_lse\_reg\].

The corollary dhows thae we can use a global least squares estimator ratver tiav a slevea lfast squares estimator (cf. [@brunel2013adaptive]) to asgitve the optimal rcte of convergenve.

Lt ys possible tu impose dertain tail condihions og the density jf $P$ to extend the above corollqry to a maxpmum risk bound over apl convex szts in ${\mathnb{R}}^d$. A proof in this venn is darried out in the ckvtext of $s$-concavd dvnsidy estimation in ${\mathbb{R}}^d$ eo be deteiled below.

Bdforg the pwoof of Thforem \[thm:rate\_optimal\_lse\_rfg\], we naed followlng:

\[lem:lse\_additive\_error\] Consider the regressiom kodvl (\[eqn:reg\_iodel\]) and the lease squares estikator $\hct{C}_n$ iv (\[def:
alpha\neq 1$, $ \log \mathcal{N}_I({\varepsilon},\mathscr{C},P)\leq L{\varepsilon}^{-\alpha}$. Then \in {\mathbb{E}}_{C_0} {\lvert\hat{C}_n\Delta \lesssim n^{-1/(\alpha+1)}. \end{aligned}$$ cannot improved in a sense if furthermore lower bound on the metric entropy the same order as that of the upper bound is available. As a corollary of the above Theorem \[thm:rate\_optimal\_lse\_reg\], let $\mathscr{C}_d$ be the collection of all bodies in unit in ${\mathbb{R}}^d$ and $P$ the uniform distribution on the unit ball. Fix $d\geq 4$. Then $$\begin{aligned} \in \mathscr{C}_d} {\mathbb{E}}_{C_0} {\lvert\hat{C}_n\Delta C_0\rvert} \lesssim n^{-2/(d+1)}. \end{aligned}$$ claim essentially follows from 8.25 and Corollary 8.26 of asserting we can $\alpha=(d-1)/2$ Theorem The corollary shows we can use a global least squares estimator rather than a sieved least squares estimator (cf. [@brunel2013adaptive]) achieve the of convergence. is to certain tail conditions density of $P$ to extend the a maximum risk bound over all convex sets ${\mathbb{R}}^d$. A in this vein is carried out the context of $s$-concave density estimation in ${\mathbb{R}}^d$ be detailed below. Before the proof of Theorem \[thm:rate\_optimal\_lse\_reg\], we need following: \[lem:lse\_additive\_error\] Consider the (\[eqn:reg\_model\]) and the least estimator $\hat{C}_n$ in
alpha\neq 1$, $
    \log \mathcal{N}_I({\varepSilon},\mathsCr{C},P)\lEq L{\VarEpSiloN}^{-\alpHa}$. Then $$\begin{aliGNed}
    \sUp_{C_0 \in \mathscr{C}} {\mathbb{E}}_{C_0} {\lVert\hAt{c}_N\DelTA C_0\Rvert} \Lesssim N^{-1/(\AlPHA+1)}.
    \enD{aLiGneD}$$

BY [@YaNg1999infOrmAtion], thE rate $n^{-1/(\alphA+1)}$ caNnOt be improved IN a Minimax senSe iF furthermore A loWer bouNd On tHE metrIc eNtropY on the SAme ordEr as that oF tHE upper BOund is aVAIlAble.

as a straightforwarD CoROllary of the aboVe TheoReM \[ThM:RAte\_OptImal\_lse\_reg\], LeT $\mathSCr{C}_d$ be tHE cOLLEctIOn of all convex Bodies contaINed In the uNiT baLL in ${\matHbb{R}}^d$ AnD $p$ thE uniform disTribUtion on thE unit bALl.

Fix $d\gEQ 4$. Then $$\beGin{aliGneD}
    \suP_{C_0 \in \MAtHsCr{C}_D} {\mAThbB{e}}_{C_0} {\LveRT\haT{C}_n\Delta c_0\rVeRt} \lesSsim N^{-2/(D+1)}.
    \END{aliGneD}$$

The Claim Essentially foLloWs frOM ThEorem 8.25 And CoRollArY 8.26 of [@duDley1999unIform], AsSerting that we caN takE $\alpha=(d-1)/2$ in theOrEm \[tHm:Rate\_oPTimal\_lSe\_rEg\].

THe corolLary shoWS thAt WE CAn Use a global least squArES EsTimator rAther tHAn A sIEved leasT sQuaRes eSTImatoR (cf. [@bRUnEl2013adaptiVe]) to acHIeVe The optiMaL rate oF cOnvErgEnce.

IT Is poSsible To impose CertaIN tail conditionS On the density oF $p$ tO EXtENd thE abOve corollarY to a MAximUm riSK bOunD Over aLl conVeX SeTS in ${\mathbb{R}}^d$. A proof in ThIs vein Is carRied out in the cOntext of $s$-cONCAve densiTy esTImATion in ${\mathbb{R}}^d$ To be dEtailed belOW.

Before tHe proOf of TheoRem \[thm:ratE\_OPtimal\_lsE\_reG\], we NeeD foLLOwIng:

\[lem:lse\_addiTIVe\_erRoR\] ConsidEr tHe regreSsiOn mOdeL (\[eqN:rEg\_model\]) anD the leasT sQuArEs EstImatoR $\Hat{C}_n$ in (\[dEf:
alpha\neq 1$, $
    \log \ mathcal{N} _I({\ var eps il on}, \mat hscr{C},P)\leq L{\v arepsilon}^{-\alpha}$.  Then  $ $ \beg i n{ align ed}
  \s u p _{C _0  \ in\m a th scr{C }}{\mathb b{E}}_{C_0 } { \l vert\hat{C}_ n \D elta C_0\r ver t} \lesssimn^{ -1/(\a lp ha+ 1 )}.
  \end{ aligne d }$$

B y [@yang1 99 9 inform a tion],t h erate  $n^{-1/(\alpha+1 ) }$ cannot be impr oved i na  m i n ima x s ense if fu rt hermo r e a low e rb o u ndo n the metricentropy ont hesame o rd era s that  of t he upp er bound is  ava ilable.
As a s t raightf o rward c orolla ryofthea bo ve  Th eo r em\ [t hm: r ate \_optima l\ _l se\_r eg\] , l e t $\ mat hscr {C}_d $ be the coll ect iono f a ll co nvexbodi es  cont ainedin th eunit ball in ${ \mat hbb{R}}^d $ a nd  $P $the u n iformdis tri butionon theu nit  b a l l .
Fix $d\geq 4$. Th en $ $\ begin{al igned}   \ sup_{C_0  \ in\mat h s cr{C} _d}{ \m athbb{E} }_{C_0 }  { \l vert\ha t{ C}_n\D el taC_0 \rver t } \l esssim  n^{-2/( d+1)} . 
    \end{alig n ed}$$

The cl a im e ss e ntia lly  follows fr om T h eore m 8. 2 5and Corol lary8. 2 6o f [@dudley1999unifo rm ], ass ertin g that we can  take $\al p h a =(d-1)/2 $ in Th e orem \[thm:rat e\_op timal\_lse \ _reg\].
Thecorollar y shows t h a t we can  us e a  gl oba l le ast squares e s t imat or  rather  th an a si eve d l eas t s qu ares esti mator (c f.  [ @b ru nel 2013a d aptive])  t o a ch iev e the optima l rat e of  c on v erg ence.
I ti s  pos si bl e to  im po se ce rtai n  ta il cond itions on  th e  den si ty  of $P$  to extend th eabove coro ll ary  to am a ximum ri sk bound over all conve x  sets i n $ {\mat hbb{ R}}^d$. A  pr oof in  th i s vein  is ca rried  o uti n  thec o nt ext  o f $s$-conc a v e d ensit yesti mationin ${\mathbb{R}}^d $  to  be detailedbel ow.B ef ore th e  pr oo f  of T heorem \[thm:ra te\_optima l\ _ ls e\_reg\],w e n ee d follo wing:
\[lem : lse\_ad ditive\_e rror\] Co ns ider t heregression  model ( \[eqn:reg \ _mode l \] ) and  th e leas tsqu aresestima t or$\hat {C}_n$  i n (\[d ef:
alpha\neq 1$,_$
 _  \log \mathcal{N}_I({\varepsilon},\mathscr{C},P)\leq_L{\varepsilon}^{-\alpha}$. Then_$$\begin{aligned}
_ __\sup_{C_0 \in \mathscr{C}}_{\mathbb{E}}_{C_0} {\lvert\hat{C}_n\Delta C_0\rvert}_\lesssim n^{-1/(\alpha+1)}.
  _ \end{aligned}$$

By [@yang1999information],_the_rate $n^{-1/(\alpha+1)}$ cannot be improved in a minimax sense if furthermore a lower bound_on_the metric_entropy_on_the same order as that_of the upper bound is_available.

As a_straightforward corollary of the above Theorem \[thm:rate\_optimal\_lse\_reg\], let_$\mathscr{C}_d$_be the collection_of all convex bodies contained in the unit ball_in ${\mathbb{R}}^d$ and $P$ the uniform_distribution on the_unit_ball.

Fix_$d\geq 4$. Then $$\begin{aligned}
_   \sup_{C_0 \in \mathscr{C}_d}_{\mathbb{E}}_{C_0} {\lvert\hat{C}_n\Delta C_0\rvert} \lesssim n^{-2/(d+1)}.
 _  \end{aligned}$$

The claim essentially follows from_Theorem 8.25 and Corollary 8.26 of_[@dudley1999uniform], asserting that we can_take $\alpha=(d-1)/2$_in Theorem \[thm:rate\_optimal\_lse\_reg\].

The corollary shows_that we can_use a_global least squares_estimator rather than a sieved least_squares estimator (cf._[@brunel2013adaptive]) to achieve the optimal rate_of_convergence.

It is possible_to_impose_certain tail_conditions on the_density_of $P$_to_extend the above corollary to a_maximum_risk bound over all convex sets in_${\mathbb{R}}^d$. A proof in_this_vein is carried out_in the context of $s$-concave_density estimation in ${\mathbb{R}}^d$ to be_detailed below.

Before_the proof_of Theorem \[thm:rate\_optimal\_lse\_reg\], we need following:

\[lem:lse\_additive\_error\] Consider the regression model (\[eqn:reg\_model\])_and the least squares estimator $\hat{C}_n$_in (\[def: