

The baseline R2D2 maintains a Q-function $Q_\theta(x,a)$ parameterized by a neural network $\theta$. The central learner maintains an updated parameter $\theta$ and distributed actors maintain slightly delayed copies $\theta_{\text{old}}$. Distributed actors collect data using behavior policy $\mu$, defined as ${\varepsilon}$-greedy with respect to $Q_{\theta_{\text{old}}}(x,a)$. The target policy $\pi$ is defined as greedy with respect to $Q_\theta(x,a)$. Actors send data to a replay buffer, and the learner samples partial trajectories $(x_t,a_t,r_t)_{t=1}^T$ from the buffer and computes updates to the parameter $\theta$. In particular, the learner calculates regression targets $Q_{\text{target}}(x_t,a_t)$ and the Q-function is updated via $\theta\leftarrow \theta - \alpha \cdot \nabla_\theta (Q_\theta(x_t,a_t)-Q_{\text{target}}(x_t,a_t))^2$ with learning rate $\alpha > 0$.

#### Algorithmic variants.

Algorithmic variants of R2D2 differ in how they compute the targets $Q_{\text{target}}(x,a)$. A useful unified view provided by @rowland2019adaptive is that $Q_{\text{target}}(x,a)$ aims to approximate $Q^\pi(x,a)$ such that $Q_\theta(x,a) \rightarrow Q^\pi(x,a)$ during the update.

Along sampled trajectories, we recursively calculate the targets $Q_{\text{target}}(x_t,a_t),1\leq t\leq T$ based on recipes of different variants. Below are a few alternatives we evaluated in our experimenst, where we e.g., use $\hat{Q}_{\text{zero}}(x_t,a_t)$ to represent $Q_{\text{target}}(x_t,a_t)$ for the zero-order baseline.

-   **Zero-order:** $\hat{Q}_{\text{zero}}(x_t,a_t) \triangleq r_t + \gamma \hat{Q}_{\text{zero}}(x_{t+1},a_{t+1})$

-   **First-order:** $\hat{
The baseline R2D2 maintains a Q - function $ Q_\theta(x, a)$ parameterized by a neural net $ \theta$. The cardinal apprentice maintains an updated parameter $ \theta$ and spread actors maintain slenderly delayed copies $ \theta_{\text{old}}$. Distributed actor collect data use behavior policy $ \mu$, defined as $ { \varepsilon}$-greedy with obedience to $ Q_{\theta_{\text{old}}}(x, a)$. The target policy $ \pi$ is defined as greedy with respect to $ Q_\theta(x, a)$. Actors send datum to a replay buffer, and the learner samples fond trajectories $ (x_t, a_t, r_t)_{t=1}^T$ from the buffer and computes updates to the parameter $ \theta$. In especial, the learner calculates regression targets $ Q_{\text{target}}(x_t, a_t)$ and the Q - function is update via $ \theta\leftarrow \theta - \alpha \cdot \nabla_\theta (Q_\theta(x_t, a_t)-Q_{\text{target}}(x_t, a_t))^2 $ with learning rate $ \alpha > 0$. 

 # # # # Algorithmic variants. 

 Algorithmic variants of R2D2 differ in how they compute the targets $ Q_{\text{target}}(x, a)$. A useful unified view provided by @rowland2019adaptive is that $ Q_{\text{target}}(x, a)$ aims to approximate $ Q^\pi(x, a)$ such that $ Q_\theta(x, a) \rightarrow Q^\pi(x, a)$ during the update. 

 Along sampled trajectories, we recursively calculate the targets $ Q_{\text{target}}(x_t, a_t),1\leq t\leq T$ based on recipe of unlike variants. Below are a few alternatives we evaluated in our experimenst, where we for example, practice $ \hat{Q}_{\text{zero}}(x_t, a_t)$ to represent $ Q_{\text{target}}(x_t, a_t)$ for the zero - order baseline. 

 -    * * Zero - order :* * $ \hat{Q}_{\text{zero}}(x_t, a_t) \triangleq r_t + \gamma \hat{Q}_{\text{zero}}(x_{t+1},a_{t+1})$ 

 -    * * First - order :* * $ \hat {


The baseline R2D2 maintains a Q-function $Q_\theja(z,a)$ paremeteriaed by a neural network $\theta$. The ceitrao leaener maintains an updaged paramvter $\thetq$ anv distributed acvkrs maikcain apighclb delayed copiex $\theta_{\texd{old}}$. Distributad aetors collect data using behavior pojicy $\mu$, dffined as ${\vareksilom}$-dreesj cith respect to $Q_{\theta_{\text{old}}}(x,a)$. The tagget policy $\pi$ is defined as greedy with redpech to $Q_\theta(x,a)$. Actogs send datq to q replay bufwer, and tht nearner sajples partial trajectories $(x_t,a_t,f_t)_{t=1}^T$ yrom the budfwr wtd computes updanes to the pavsmeter $\theta$. On particular, bhe lxarnwr calculates regressmon targets $Q_{\text{tardet}}(x_t,a_t)$ atd the Q-function is updateg vid $\thdra\ldftzrcow \theta - \ampha \cdot \habla_\theta (W_\theta(x_t,a_t)-Q_{\text{targtt}}(x_e,q_t))^2$ with learnjng raee $\alpha > 0$.

#### Algorithmic variants.

Algorithmib vadiants of R2D2 differ in yow they compute the jargets $Q_{\tqxt{target}}(x,a)$. A useful unified view provided by @rownand2019avaotirc kw hhat $Q_{\text{target}}(x,a)$ aims to approximate $Q^\pi(x,a)$ fhcn nhat $Q_\theta(x,a) \rigmtarrow Q^\pi(x,a)$ durimg tng update.

Along rampleb tdajectories, we reckrsiveli calcylate the tarbets $Q_{\text{target}}(x_t,a_t),1\leq t\lew T$ based on eecipes of differeut variants. Yelow sre a few alternatives we evcluates in our exoerimenst, dhere we e.g., use $\fat{A}_{\taxt{zero}}(x_u,x_t)$ to represent $Q_{\eext{targev}}(x_t,a_t)$ for thd zeto-order baseline.

-   **Zero-order:** $\hat{Q}_{\text{zero}}(d_t,a_t) \jriangneq r_t + \galma \hat{Q}_{\text{zero}}(x_{t+1},a_{t+1})$

-   **First-ordxc:** $\hat{
The baseline R2D2 maintains a Q-function $Q_\theta(x,a)$ a network $\theta$. central learner maintains distributed maintain slightly delayed $\theta_{\text{old}}$. Distributed actors data using behavior policy $\mu$, defined ${\varepsilon}$-greedy with respect to $Q_{\theta_{\text{old}}}(x,a)$. The target policy $\pi$ is defined as greedy respect to $Q_\theta(x,a)$. Actors send data to a replay buffer, and the learner partial $(x_t,a_t,r_t)_{t=1}^T$ the and computes updates to the parameter $\theta$. In particular, the learner calculates regression targets $Q_{\text{target}}(x_t,a_t)$ and Q-function is updated via $\theta\leftarrow \theta - \alpha \nabla_\theta (Q_\theta(x_t,a_t)-Q_{\text{target}}(x_t,a_t))^2$ with learning $\alpha > 0$. #### Algorithmic Algorithmic of R2D2 in they the targets $Q_{\text{target}}(x,a)$. useful unified view provided by @rowland2019adaptive is that $Q_{\text{target}}(x,a)$ aims to approximate $Q^\pi(x,a)$ such that $Q_\theta(x,a) \rightarrow during the sampled trajectories, recursively the $Q_{\text{target}}(x_t,a_t),1\leq t\leq T$ recipes of different variants. Below are we evaluated in our experimenst, where we e.g., $\hat{Q}_{\text{zero}}(x_t,a_t)$ to $Q_{\text{target}}(x_t,a_t)$ for the zero-order baseline. - $\hat{Q}_{\text{zero}}(x_t,a_t) \triangleq r_t + \gamma \hat{Q}_{\text{zero}}(x_{t+1},a_{t+1})$ - **First-order:**


The baseline R2D2 maintains a Q-fUnction $Q_\thEta(x,a)$ ParAmeTeRizeD by a Neural network $\tHEta$. THe central learner maintaIns an UpDAted PArAmeteR $\theta$ aND dISTriBuTeD acToRS mAintaIn sLightly Delayed copIes $\ThEta_{\text{old}}$. DiSTrIbuted actoRs cOllect data usIng BehaviOr PolICy $\mu$, dEfiNed as ${\VarepsILon}$-greEdy with reSpECt to $Q_{\tHEta_{\text{OLD}}}(x,A)$. The Target policy $\pi$ is dEFiNEd as greedy with RespecT tO $q_\tHETa(x,A)$. AcTors send daTa To a rePLay buffER, aND THe lEArner samples pArtial trajeCTorIes $(x_t,a_T,r_T)_{t=1}^T$ FRom the BuffeR aND coMputes updatEs to The parameTer $\theTA$. In partICular, thE learnEr cAlcUlatES rEgResSiON taRGeTs $Q_{\TExt{Target}}(x_t,A_t)$ AnD the Q-FuncTION Is upDatEd viA $\thetA\leftarrow \theTa - \aLpha \CDot \Nabla_\Theta (q_\theTa(X_t,a_t)-Q_{\Text{taRget}}(x_T,a_T))^2$ with learning raTe $\alPha > 0$.

#### AlgoriThmIc VarIaNts.

AlGOrithmIc vAriAnts of R2d2 differ IN hoW tHEY CoMpute the targets $Q_{\teXt{TARgEt}}(x,a)$. A useFul uniFIeD vIEw providEd By @rOwlaND2019AdaptIve iS ThAt $Q_{\text{tArget}}(x,A)$ AiMs To approXiMate $Q^\pI(x,A)$ suCh tHat $Q_\tHEta(x,A) \rightArrow Q^\pi(X,a)$ durINg the update.

AloNG sampled trajeCToRIEs, WE recUrsIvely calculAte tHE tarGets $q_{\TeXt{tARget}}(x_T,a_t),1\leQ t\LEq t$ Based on recipes of difFeRent vaRiantS. Below are a few AlternativES WE evaluatEd in OUr EXperimenst, wherE we e.g., Use $\hat{Q}_{\texT{Zero}}(x_t,a_t)$ To repResent $Q_{\tExt{target}}(X_T,A_t)$ for the ZerO-orDer BasELInE.

-   **Zero-order:** $\hat{q}_{\TExt{zErO}}(x_t,a_t) \trIanGleq r_t + \gAmmA \haT{Q}_{\tExt{ZeRo}}(x_{t+1},a_{t+1})$

-   **FirSt-order:** $\hAt{


The baseline R2D2 mainta ins a Q-fu nctio n $ Q_\ th eta( x,a) $ parameterize d  bya neural network $\the ta$.Th e  cen t ra l lea rner ma i nt a i nsan  u pda te d  p arame ter  $\thet a$ and dis tri bu ted actors m a in tain sligh tly  delayed cop ies  $\the ta _{\ t ext{o ld} }$. D istrib u ted ac tors coll ec t  datau sing be h a vi or p olicy $\mu$, defi n ed as ${\varepsil on}$-g re e dy w ith  re spect to $ Q_ {\the t a_{\tex t {o l d } }}( x ,a)$. The tar get policy$ \pi $ is d ef ine d  as gr eedywi t h r espect to $ Q_\t heta(x,a) $. Act o rs send data to  a rep lay  bu ffer ,  a nd  th el ear n er  sa m ple s partia ltr aject orie s $ ( x_t, a_t ,r_t )_{t= 1}^T$ from th e b uffe r  an d com putes  upd at es to  the p arame te r $\theta$. Inpart icular, t hele arn er  calc u latesreg res sion ta rgets $ Q _{\ te x t { ta rget}}(x_t,a_t)$ a nd t he  Q-funct ion is up da t ed via $ \t het a\le f t arrow  \th e ta  - \alph a \cdo t  \ na bla_\th et a (Q_\ th eta (x_ t,a_t ) -Q_{ \text{ target}} (x_t, a _t))^2$ with l e arning rate $ \ al p h a>  0$. 

# ### Algorit hmic vari ants . 
Alg o rithm ic va ri a nt s  of R2D2 differ inho w they  comp ute the targe ts $Q_{\te x t { target}} (x,a ) $. A useful unifi ed vi ew provide d  by @row land2 019adapt ive is th a t  $Q_{\te xt{ tar get }}( x , a) $ aims to app r o xima te  $Q^\pi (x, a)$ suc h t hat  $Q _\t he ta(x,a) \ rightarr ow  Q ^\ pi (x, a)$ d u ring the  u pda te .
Along sample d tra ject or ie s , w e recur s iv e l y ca lc ul atethe  t arget s $Q _ {\t ext{tar get}}(x_t ,a_ t ),1\ le qt\leq T $ based on re ci pes of dif fe ren t vari a n ts. Belo w are a few alternative s  we eva lua ted i n ou r experim ens t, whe rew e e.g. , use$\hat {Q }_{ \ t ext{z e r o} }(x _t ,a_t)$ tor e pre sent$Q _{\t ext{tar get}}(x_t,a_t)$ fo r  th e zero-orderbas elin e . 
- ** Z ero -o r der : * * $\hat{Q}_{\te xt{zero}}( x_ t ,a _t) \trian g leq  r _t + \g amma \h at{Q} _ {\text{ zero}}(x_ {t+1},a_{ t+ 1})$ -  **First-o rder:**$\hat{


The baseline_R2D2 maintains_a Q-function $Q_\theta(x,a)$ parameterized_by a_neural_network $\theta$._The_central learner maintains_an updated parameter_$\theta$ and distributed actors_maintain slightly delayed_copies_$\theta_{\text{old}}$. Distributed actors collect data using behavior policy $\mu$, defined as ${\varepsilon}$-greedy with respect_to_$Q_{\theta_{\text{old}}}(x,a)$. The_target_policy_$\pi$ is defined as greedy_with respect to $Q_\theta(x,a)$. Actors_send data_to a replay buffer, and the learner samples_partial_trajectories $(x_t,a_t,r_t)_{t=1}^T$ from_the buffer and computes updates to the parameter $\theta$._In particular, the learner calculates regression_targets $Q_{\text{target}}(x_t,a_t)$ and_the_Q-function_is updated via $\theta\leftarrow_\theta - \alpha \cdot \nabla_\theta (Q_\theta(x_t,a_t)-Q_{\text{target}}(x_t,a_t))^2$_with learning rate $\alpha > 0$.

####_Algorithmic variants.

Algorithmic variants of R2D2 differ in_how they compute the targets $Q_{\text{target}}(x,a)$._A useful unified view provided_by @rowland2019adaptive_is that $Q_{\text{target}}(x,a)$ aims to_approximate $Q^\pi(x,a)$ such_that $Q_\theta(x,a)_\rightarrow Q^\pi(x,a)$ during_the update.

Along sampled trajectories, we recursively_calculate the targets_$Q_{\text{target}}(x_t,a_t),1\leq t\leq T$ based on recipes_of_different variants. Below_are_a_few alternatives_we evaluated in_our_experimenst, where_we_e.g., use $\hat{Q}_{\text{zero}}(x_t,a_t)$ to represent $Q_{\text{target}}(x_t,a_t)$_for_the zero-order baseline.

-   **Zero-order:** $\hat{Q}_{\text{zero}}(x_t,a_t)_\triangleq r_t + \gamma_\hat{Q}_{\text{zero}}(x_{t+1},a_{t+1})$

-_  **First-order:** $\hat{