
     ATWT          2.1074           1.5489           1.4156           0.9983           0.9892            
     AWLP          2.0507           1.5223           1.3005           0.9985           0.9896            
      GLP          2.1739           1.5937           1.2016           0.9980           0.9879            
     P+XS          1.1031           0.7988           0.9034           0.9998           0.9946            
      NLV      [**0.9395**]{}   [**0.6794**]{}   [**0.7543**]{}   [**0.9999**]{}   [**0.9954**]{}        
     NLVD          1.1546           0.8377           0.9651           0.9997           0.9934            

  : Quantitative evaluation of the fused products on simulated data from RGB aerial images at resolution of 30 cm per pixel. For these experiments, the low-resolution spectral components were co-registered and the panchro-spectral constraint fulfilled with $\alpha_B=\alpha_G=\alpha_R=\frac{1}{3}$. In this ideal setting, NLV provides the best numerical results although the proposed NLVD model is the closest to it. Only P+XS beats NLVD when the aliasing is not as apparent (Table \[table\_30cm\_s17\_RGB\_regist\_linear\]). Interestingly, we observe that PCA, Brovey, PRACS, HPF, SFIM, and NLVD seem to work almost independent of the amount of aliasing in the data, since the quality of their performances with respect to all metrics even increase as $\sigma$ decreases.[]{data-label="table_30cm_RGB_regist_linear"}

[0.99]{}

                    RMSE            ERGAS             SAM              SSIM            Q$2^n$            
  ----------- ---------------- ---------------- ---------------- ---------------- ---------------- -- -- --
   Reference         0                0                0                1                1               
      PCA          2.5703           1.8913           1.5554           0.9953           0.9745            
    Brovey         2.1917           1.6125           1.3189           0.9963           0.9766            
     BDSD          1.9834           1.4462
ATWT           2.1074            1.5489            1.4156            0.9983            0.9892            
      AWLP           2.0507            1.5223            1.3005            0.9985            0.9896            
       GLP           2.1739            1.5937            1.2016            0.9980            0.9879            
      P+XS           1.1031            0.7988            0.9034            0.9998            0.9946            
       NLV       [ * * 0.9395 * * ] { }    [ * * 0.6794 * * ] { }    [ * * 0.7543 * * ] { }    [ * * 0.9999 * * ] { }    [ * * 0.9954 * * ] { }        
      NLVD           1.1546            0.8377            0.9651            0.9997            0.9934            

  : Quantitative evaluation of the fused products on simulated data from RGB aeriform image at resolution of 30 centimeter per pixel. For these experiment, the low - resolution apparitional components were co - registered and the panchro - spectral restraint satisfy with $ \alpha_B=\alpha_G=\alpha_R=\frac{1}{3}$. In this ideal setting, NLV put up the best numerical solution although the nominate NLVD model is the near to it. Only P+XS beats NLVD when the aliasing is not equally apparent (Table \[table\_30cm\_s17\_RGB\_regist\_linear\ ]). Interestingly, we observe that PCA, Brovey, PRACS, HPF, SFIM, and NLVD seem to exercise almost independent of the sum of aliasing in the data, since the timbre of their performances with regard to all metrics even increase as $ \sigma$ decreases.[]{data - label="table_30cm_RGB_regist_linear " } 

 [ 0.99 ] { } 

                     RMSE             ERGAS              SAM               SSIM             Q$2^n$            
   ----------- ---------------- ---------------- ---------------- ---------------- ---------------- -- -- -- 
    Reference          0                 0                 0                 1                 1               
       PCA           2.5703            1.8913            1.5554            0.9953            0.9745            
     Brovey          2.1917            1.6125            1.3189            0.9963            0.9766            
      BDSD           1.9834            1.4462

     ATWT          2.1074           1.5489           1.4156           0.9983           0.9892            
     AWLP          2.0507           1.5223           1.3005           0.9985           0.9896            
      GLP          2.1739           1.5937           1.2016           0.9980           0.9879            
     P+XS          1.1031           0.7988           0.9034           0.9998           0.9946            
      NLV      [**0.9395**]{}   [**0.6794**]{}   [**0.7543**]{}   [**0.9999**]{}   [**0.9954**]{}        
     NLVD          1.1546           0.8377           0.9651           0.9997           0.9934            

  : Quantitatpre evaluatikn of the fused products on simjlateb data from RTB wgrial images at rvsolution of 30 cm per [ixel. Fpr these experlmentv, tye low-resolution specvral components were co-registarzd and the panchro-spexteal cmnstsaing fuufimlxd sith $\apphe_B=\alpha_G=\alpga_R=\frac{1}{3}$. In rhis ideal setting, MLD provides the best guierical results although the proposed NNVD model is the closest ti it. Only P+XS beats NPVD when ehe aliasing is not as apparent (Table \[table\_30cm\_s17\_RGB\_segisv\_lknecv\]). Kbtfrestingly, we observe that PCA, Brovey, PRACS, H[R, XFPM, and NLVD seem bo work almost indrpfncgnt of the amoont of cmizsing in the data, dince tre quqlity of uheir performances with respect ro all metribs ecen increase as $\siyma$ decreaser.[]{dats-labek="table_30cm_RGB_regist_linear"}

[0.99]{}

                    RMSE            ERGAS             SAM              SFIM            Q$2^n$            
  ----------- ---------------- ---------------- ---------------- ---------------- ---------------- -- -- --
   Refcsence         0                0                0                1                1               
      PCA          2.5703           1.8913           1.5554           0.9953           0.9745            
    Brovey         2.1917           1.6125           1.3189           0.9963           0.9766            
     VDSD          1.9834           1.4462
ATWT 2.1074 1.5489 1.4156 0.9983 0.9892 AWLP 1.3005 0.9896 GLP 1.5937 1.2016 0.9980 0.9998 NLV [**0.9395**]{} [**0.6794**]{} [**0.9999**]{} [**0.9954**]{} NLVD 0.8377 0.9651 0.9997 0.9934 : Quantitative of the fused products on simulated data from RGB aerial images at resolution 30 cm per pixel. For these experiments, the low-resolution spectral components were co-registered the constraint with In this ideal setting, NLV provides the best numerical results although the proposed NLVD model is closest to it. Only P+XS beats NLVD when aliasing is not as (Table \[table\_30cm\_s17\_RGB\_regist\_linear\]). Interestingly, we observe PCA, PRACS, HPF, and seem work almost independent the amount of aliasing in the data, since the quality of their performances with respect to all even increase decreases.[]{data-label="table_30cm_RGB_regist_linear"} [0.99]{} ERGAS SSIM ----------- ---------------- ---------------- ---------------- -- -- -- Reference 0 1 PCA 2.5703 1.8913 1.5554 0.9953 0.9745 Brovey 1.6125 1.3189 0.9766 BDSD 1.9834 1.4462

     ATWT          2.1074           1.5489           1.4156           0.9983           0.9892            
     AWLP          2.0507           1.5223           1.3005           0.9985           0.9896            
      GLP          2.1739           1.5937           1.2016           0.9980           0.9879            
     P+XS          1.1031           0.7988           0.9034           0.9998           0.9946            
      NLV      [**0.9395**]{}   [**0.6794**]{}   [**0.7543**]{}   [**0.9999**]{}   [**0.9954**]{}        
     NLVD          1.1546           0.8377           0.9651           0.9997           0.9934            

  : QuanTitative evAluatIon Of tHe FuseD proDucts on simulatED datA from RGB aerial images at ResolUtIOn of 30 CM pEr pixEl. For thESe EXPerImEnTs, tHe LOw-ResolUtiOn spectRal componeNts WeRe co-registerED aNd the panchRo-sPectral constRaiNt fulfIlLed WIth $\alPha_b=\alphA_G=\alphA_r=\frac{1}{3}$. IN this ideaL sETting, Nlv providES ThE besT numerical results ALtHOugh the proposeD NLVD mOdEL iS THe cLosEst to it. OnlY P+xS beaTS NLVD whEN tHE ALiaSIng is not as appArent (Table \[tABle\_30Cm\_s17\_RGB\_ReGisT\_Linear\]). interEsTIngLy, we observe That pCA, Brovey, pRACS, Hpf, SFIM, anD nLVD seeM to worK alMosT indEPeNdEnt Of THe aMOuNt oF AliAsing in tHe DaTa, sinCe thE QUALity Of tHeir PerfoRmances with reSpeCt to ALl mEtricS even IncrEaSe as $\sIgma$ deCreasEs.[]{Data-label="table_30cM_RGB_Regist_linEar"}

[0.99]{}

                    rMsE            ErGaS             SAM              ssIM            Q$2^n$            
  ----------- ---------------- ---------------- ---------------- ---------------- ---------------- -- -- --
   REfeRenCe         0                0                0                1                1               
      PCA          2.5703           1.8913           1.5554           0.9953           0.9745            
    BrOvey         2.1917           1.6125           1.3189           0.9963           0.9766            
     BDSd          1.9834           1.4462

     ATWT          2.1074           1.54 89       1.4 156          0 .998 3           0.9892        
   A WLP       2. 0 5 07     1. 5223        1.3005        0.9985        0.9896            
    GLP      2.1 739          1 .5937         1 . 2016       0 .9 980          0.9879        
     P +XS    1.1 031           0 .7988        0 . 9 034           0.9 998         0 .9946             N L V     [**0.93 95** ]{}   [** 0.6794 * *]{}  [ **0.754 3**]{}   [** 0.99 9 9* *] {} [ **0 . 99 54* * ]{}        
   NLV D     1 .15 46         0.8377       0.9 651        0. 9997         0 .9 934           

 : Quantit ati ve  ev al uatio n  of th e f use d produ cts ons imu la t e d  d ata from RGB aeria li m ag es at re soluti o nof 30 cm pe rpix el.F o r the se e x pe riments,  the l o w- re solutio nspectr al  co mpo nents were  co-re gistered  andt he panchro-spe c tral constrai n tf u lf i lled  wi th $\alpha_ B=\a l pha_ G=\a l ph a_R = \frac {1}{3 }$ .  I n  this ideal setting ,NLV pr ovide s the best nu merical re s u l ts altho ught he proposed NLVDmodel  is the cl o sest toit. O nly P+XS  beats NL V D  when th e a lia sin g i s no t as apparent ( Tabl e\[table \_3 0cm\_s1 7\_ RGB \_r egi st \_linear\ ]). Inte re st in gl y,we ob s erve tha tPCA ,Bro vey,P RACS,HPF,SFIM ,an d  NL VD seem to w orkal mo st i nde pe ndent  oft heamountof aliasi ngi n th eda ta, sin ce the qualit yof their p er for mances w ith resp ect to all metrics even increas e a s $\s igma $ decreas es. []{dat a-l a bel="t able_3 0cm_R GB _re g i st_li n e ar "}
[ 0.99]{}

             RMSE             ERGAS          SAM        SS I M     Q $2^n$           
  ----- -- - -- - -------- - --- -- -- ---- ------- ----- ------- ---------  -------- -- ---- - -  -- ---------- ---- ---- --
  R efere n ce        0            0            0           1               1              
     PC A         2 .57 0 3         1.89 13         1.5 554       0.99 5 3       0.9 7 45          Brovey     2. 1917       1.61 25           1.31 8 9           0. 9963       0. 97 66           
  B DSD        1.9834         1 . 4462

 _ _ ATWT  _ __ __ 2.1074 _  _   _  1.5489__         1.4156    __ ___ 0.9983   _    _ _0.9892       __  _
     AWLP   _     _2.0507  ___   _  1.5223   _     _ 1.3005     _     0.9985_    _ _   0.9896 _  _ _  _  
   _  GLP_     __  2.1739___ _  __ _1.5937_     __   1.2016   _   __  0.9980 _    _    0.9879 _ _ _      
    _P+XS     _   _1.1031 __  __ _  0.7988    _ _    0.9034 _   __    0.9998 _     _   0.9946 ___    _   
  _  _NLV      [**0.9395**]{}__ [**0.6794**]{}   [**0.7543**]{} __[**0.9999**]{}   [**0.9954**]{}  ___   
 _   NLVD  _       1.1546 _  _    __0.8377_         _0.9651 _  _      0.9997   _      _0.9934          _ 

  : Quantitative evaluation of the_fused products on simulated data from RGB_aerial images at resolution_of_30 cm per pixel. For these experiments,_the_low-resolution_spectral_components were co-registered_and the panchro-spectral_constraint fulfilled with_$\alpha_B=\alpha_G=\alpha_R=\frac{1}{3}$. In_this ideal setting,_NLV provides_the best numerical_results_although the proposed NLVD model is the closest to it. Only P+XS beats NLVD when the aliasing is_not as apparent (Table \[table\_30cm\_s17\_RGB\_regist\_linear\]). Interestingly,_we observe that PCA, Brovey,_PRACS,_HPF, SFIM, and_NLVD seem to work_almost independent of the amount of aliasing in_the data, since the quality of their performances with_respect_to all_metrics even increase as_$\sigma$ decreases.[]{data-label="table_30cm_RGB_regist_linear"}

[0.99]{}

_ _  _ _ _ _      __RMSE        ____ERGAS  _  _  _  __SAM     _  _   _ SSIM        _   Q$2^n$            
 _----------- ----------------_---------------- ---------------- ---------------- ----------------_-- --_--
_  Reference   _ _   0    __          0 ___  __     ___0__     _      __1    _ __   _   _1          __ __
__   _PCA          2.5703    __    _1.8913     __   _1.5554       _   0.9953 _   _     0.9745            
   _Brovey    _    2.1917_  __  _   1.6125_       _  1.3189           0.9963    _      0.9766_  _ _      
  _  BDSD        _ 1.9834           1.4462