$, and the induced Nemytzki operators, e.g. $\DD : H^1(0, T; S^2 ) \to H^1(0, T; S)$ and $\DD : L^2(0, T; S^2) \to L^2(0, T; S)$, with the same symbol. This will cause no confusion, since the meaning will be clear from the context.

### Operators {#operators.unnumbered}

The linear operators $A : S^2 \to S^2$ and $B : S^2 \to V'$ are defined as follows. For $\bSigma = (\bsigma,\bchi) \in S^2$ and $\bT = (\btau,\bmu) \in S^2$, let $A\bSigma$ be defined through $$\label{eq:Definition_of_a}
    \dual{\bT}{A\bSigma}_{S^2} = \int_\Omega \btau \dprod \C^{-1} \bsigma \, \dx + \int_\Omega \bmu \dprod \H^{-1} \bchi \, \dx.$$ The term $(1/2) \, \dual{A \bSigma}{\bSigma}_{S^2}$ corresponds to the energy associated with the stress state $\bSigma$. Here $\C^{-1}(x)$ and $\H^{-1}(x)$ are linear maps from $\S$ to $\S$ (i.e., they are fourth order tensors) which may depend on the spatial variable $x$. For $\bSigma = (\bsigma,\bchi) \in S^2$ and $\bv \in V$, let $$\label{eq:Definition_of_b}
    \dual{B\bSigma}{\bv}_{V',V} = - \int_\Omega \bsigma \dprod \bvarepsilon(\bv) \, \dx.$$ We recall that $\bvarepsilon(\bv) = \big(\nabla \bv + (\nabla \bv)^\top\big)/2$ denotes the (linearized) strain tensor.

### Standing assumptions {#standing-assumptions.unnumbered}

Throughout the paper, we require

\[asm:standing\_assumptions\]

1.  The domain $\Omega \subset \R^d$, $d = 3$ is a bounded Lipschitz domain in the sense
$, and the induced Nemytzki operators, e.g.   $ \DD: H^1(0, T; S^2) \to H^1(0, T; S)$ and $ \DD: L^2(0, T; S^2) \to L^2(0, T; S)$, with the same symbol. This will cause no confusion, since the meaning will be clean from the context. 

 # # # operator { # operators.unnumbered } 

 The linear operators $ A: S^2 \to S^2 $ and $ b-complex vitamin: S^2 \to V'$ are defined as follows. For $ \bSigma = (\bsigma,\bchi) \in S^2 $ and $ \bT = (\btau,\bmu) \in S^2 $, permit $ A\bSigma$ be defined through $ $ \label{eq: Definition_of_a } 
     \dual{\bT}{A\bSigma}_{S^2 } = \int_\Omega \btau \dprod \C^{-1 } \bsigma \, \dx + \int_\Omega \bmu \dprod \H^{-1 } \bchi \, \dx.$$ The term $ (1/2) \, \dual{A \bSigma}{\bSigma}_{S^2}$ match to the energy associated with the tension state $ \bSigma$. Here $ \C^{-1}(x)$ and $ \H^{-1}(x)$ are linear maps from $ \S$ to $ \S$ (i.e., they are fourth order tensor) which may depend on the spatial variable $ x$. For $ \bSigma = (\bsigma,\bchi) \in S^2 $ and $ \bv \in V$, let $ $ \label{eq: Definition_of_b } 
     \dual{B\bSigma}{\bv}_{V',V } = - \int_\Omega \bsigma \dprod \bvarepsilon(\bv) \, \dx.$$ We recall that $ \bvarepsilon(\bv) = \big(\nabla \bv + (\nabla \bv)^\top\big)/2 $ denotes the (linearize) strain tensor. 

 # # # Standing assumptions { # standing-assumptions.unnumbered } 

 Throughout the paper, we ask 

 \[asm: standing\_assumptions\ ] 

 1.   The domain $ \Omega \subset \R^d$, $ d = 3 $ is a jump Lipschitz domain in the common sense
$, anf the induced Nemytzki okerators, e.g. $\DD : H^1(0, J; W^2 ) \to I^1(0, T; S)$ ahd $\DD : L^2(0, T; S^2) \to L^2(0, T; S)$, with the same dynbol. Ukis will cause no covfusion, spnce the neanmng will be cleac from tmz confcxt.

### O'ecators {#operatorx.unnumbereg}

The linear oparxtlrs $A : S^2 \to S^2$ and $B : S^2 \to V'$ are defyned as flllows. For $\bSidma = (\fsigja,\bchi) \in S^2$ and $\bT = (\btau,\bmu) \in S^2$, lst $A\bSijma$ be defined yhrough $$\label{eq:Definition_ov_a}
    \dual{\bT}{A\bSigma}_{S^2} = \lnt_\Omega \btqu \d[eod \C^{-1} \bsigma \, \dx + \int_\Omega \bmu \dprkd \H^{-1} \bchi \, \dx.$$ The term $(1/2) \, \dual{A \cSigmc}{\bSigma}_{S^2}$ cotxwspltds to the xnergy associated with the stress state $\bSigma$. Mere $\R^{-1}(x)$ abd $\H^{-1}(x)$ are linear maps from $\S$ to $\S$ (i.e., thgy are foustk order tensors) which mqy dekend mn tfw soatjak bariabpe $e$. For $\bSigmz = (\bsigma,\bcyi) \in S^2$ and $\bv \in V$, lqn $$\label{eq:Defihition_jf_f}
    \dual{B\bSigma}{\bv}_{V',V} = - \int_\Omega \bsigma \gprkd \bvarepsilon(\bv) \, \dx.$$ We recall that $\bvarepsipon(\bv) = \bid(\nabla \bv + (\nabla \bv)^\top\big)/2$ denotes the (linearized) vtraii genwov.

### Stxbdlng assumptions {#standing-assumptions.unnumbered}

Egrpunhout the paper, ce require

\[asm:stamdlnb\_wssumptions\]

1.  Jhe domcjn $\Omega \subset \R^d$, $d = 3$ is a bouneed Lipscritz domain in the sense
$, and the induced Nemytzki operators, e.g. H^1(0, S^2 ) H^1(0, T; S)$ S^2) L^2(0, T; S)$, the same symbol. will cause no confusion, since the will be clear from the context. ### Operators {#operators.unnumbered} The linear operators $A S^2 \to S^2$ and $B : S^2 \to V'$ are defined as follows. $\bSigma (\bsigma,\bchi) S^2$ $\bT = (\btau,\bmu) \in S^2$, let $A\bSigma$ be defined through $$\label{eq:Definition_of_a} \dual{\bT}{A\bSigma}_{S^2} = \int_\Omega \btau \dprod \bsigma \, \dx + \int_\Omega \bmu \dprod \H^{-1} \, \dx.$$ The term \, \dual{A \bSigma}{\bSigma}_{S^2}$ corresponds to energy with the state Here and $\H^{-1}(x)$ are maps from $\S$ to $\S$ (i.e., they are fourth order tensors) which may depend on the spatial $x$. For (\bsigma,\bchi) \in and \in let $$\label{eq:Definition_of_b} \dual{B\bSigma}{\bv}_{V',V} \int_\Omega \bsigma \dprod \bvarepsilon(\bv) \, \dx.$$ $\bvarepsilon(\bv) = \big(\nabla \bv + (\nabla \bv)^\top\big)/2$ denotes (linearized) strain ### Standing assumptions {#standing-assumptions.unnumbered} Throughout the we require \[asm:standing\_assumptions\] 1. The domain $\Omega \subset $d = 3$ is a bounded Lipschitz domain in the sense
$, and the induced Nemytzki operAtors, e.g. $\DD : H^1(0, t; S^2 ) \to H^1(0, t; S)$ aNd $\Dd : L^2(0, t; S^2) \to l^2(0, T; S)$, wIth the same symbOL. ThiS will cause no confusion, sInce tHe MEaniNG wIll be Clear frOM tHE ConTeXt.

### opeRaTOrS {#operAtoRs.unnumBered}

The liNeaR oPerators $A : S^2 \to s^2$ AnD $B : S^2 \to V'$ are dEfiNed as follows. for $\BSigma = (\BsIgmA,\Bchi) \iN S^2$ aNd $\bT = (\bTau,\bmu) \IN S^2$, let $A\BSigma$ be dEfINed thrOUgh $$\labeL{EQ:DEfinItion_of_a}
    \dual{\bT}{A\bSIGmA}_{s^2} = \int_\Omega \btau \dProd \C^{-1} \bSiGMa \, \DX + \Int_\omeGa \bmu \dprod \h^{-1} \bChi \, \dx.$$ tHe term $(1/2) \, \dUAl{a \BsIgmA}{\BSigma}_{S^2}$ corresPonds to the eNErgY assocIaTed WIth the StresS sTAte $\BSigma$. Here $\C^{-1}(X)$ and $\h^{-1}(x)$ are lineAr maps FRom $\S$ to $\S$ (I.E., they arE fourtH orDer TensORs) WhIch MaY DepENd On tHE spAtial varIaBlE $x$. For $\BSigMA = (\BSIgma,\BchI) \in S^2$ And $\bv \In V$, let $$\label{eq:defInitIOn_oF_b}
    \duaL{B\bSiGma}{\bV}_{V',v} = - \int_\OMega \bsIgma \dPrOd \bvarepsilon(\bv) \, \Dx.$$ We Recall thaT $\bvArEpsIlOn(\bv) = \bIG(\nabla \Bv + (\nAblA \bv)^\top\bIg)/2$ denotES thE (lINEArIzed) strain tensor.

### StAnDINg AssumptiOns {#staNDiNg-ASsumptioNs.UnnUmbeRED}

ThroUghoUT tHe paper, wE requiRE

\[aSm:StandinG\_aSsumptIoNs\]

1.  THe dOmain $\oMega \Subset \r^d$, $d = 3$ is a boUnded lIpschitz domain IN the sense
$, and the induced Nemytzk i operator s, e. g.$\D D: H^ 1(0,  T; S^2 ) \toH ^1(0 , T; S)$ and $\DD : L^ 2(0,T; S^2) \t o L^2 (0, T;S )$ , wit hth e s am e  s ymbol . T his wil l cause no  co nf usion, since th e meaningwil l be clear f rom  the c on tex t .

## # O perat ors {# o perato rs.unnumb er e d}

Th e  linear o pe rato rs $A : S^2 \to S ^ 2$ and $B : S^2 \ to V'$  a r ed e fin edas follows .For $ \ bSigma=  ( \ b s igm a ,\bchi) \in S ^2$ and $\b T  =(\btau ,\ bmu )  \in S ^2$,le t  $A \bSigma$ be  def ined thro ugh $$ \ label{e q :Defini tion_o f_a }
   \ d ua l{ \bT }{ A \bS i gm a}_ { S^2 } = \int _\ Om ega \ btau \ d p rod\C^ {-1}  \bsi gma \, \dx +\in t_\O m ega  \bmu  \dpr od \ H^ {-1}\bchi\, \d x. $$ The term $(1 /2)\, \dual{ A \ bS igm a} {\bSi g ma}_{S ^2} $ c orrespo nds tot heen e r g yassociated with th es t re ss state  $\bSi g ma $. Here $\C ^{ -1} (x)$ a nd $\ H^{- 1 }( x)$ arelinear ma ps  from $ \S $ to $ \S $ ( i.e ., th e y ar e four th order  tens o rs) which mayd epend on thes pa t i al vari abl e $x$. For$\bS i gma= (\ b si gma , \bchi ) \in  S ^ 2$ and $\bv \in V$, le t$$\lab el{eq :Definition_o f_b}
    \ d u a l{B\bSig ma}{ \ bv } _{V',V} = - \i nt_\O mega \bsig m a \dprod  \bva repsilon (\bv) \,\ d x.$$ Werec all  th at$ \ bv arepsilon(\bv ) = \b ig (\nabla  \b v + (\n abl a \ bv) ^\t op \big)/2$denotesth e(l in ear ized) strain t en sor .
## # Sta n ding a ssump tion s{# s tan ding-as s um p t ions .u nn umbe red }
Thro ugho u t t he pape r, we req uir e 

\[ as m: standin g\_assumption s\ ]

1.  The  d oma in $\O m e ga \subs et \R^d$, $d = 3$ is ab oundedLip schit z do main in t hesense
$, and_the induced_Nemytzki operators, e.g. $\DD :_H^1(0, T;_S^2_) \to_H^1(0,_T; S)$ and_$\DD : L^2(0,_T; S^2) \to L^2(0,_T; S)$, with_the_same symbol. This will cause no confusion, since the meaning will be clear from_the_context.

### Operators_{#operators.unnumbered}

The_linear_operators $A : S^2 \to_S^2$ and $B : S^2_\to V'$_are defined as follows. For $\bSigma = (\bsigma,\bchi)_\in_S^2$ and $\bT_= (\btau,\bmu) \in S^2$, let $A\bSigma$ be defined through_$$\label{eq:Definition_of_a}
    \dual{\bT}{A\bSigma}_{S^2} =_\int_\Omega \btau \dprod_\C^{-1}_\bsigma_\, \dx + \int_\Omega_\bmu \dprod \H^{-1} \bchi \, \dx.$$_The term $(1/2) \, \dual{A \bSigma}{\bSigma}_{S^2}$_corresponds to the energy associated with the_stress state $\bSigma$. Here $\C^{-1}(x)$ and_$\H^{-1}(x)$ are linear maps from_$\S$ to_$\S$ (i.e., they are fourth_order tensors) which_may depend_on the spatial_variable $x$. For $\bSigma = (\bsigma,\bchi)_\in S^2$ and_$\bv \in V$, let $$\label{eq:Definition_of_b}
 __ \dual{B\bSigma}{\bv}_{V',V} =_-_\int_\Omega_\bsigma \dprod_\bvarepsilon(\bv) \, \dx.$$_We_recall that_$\bvarepsilon(\bv)_= \big(\nabla \bv + (\nabla \bv)^\top\big)/2$_denotes_the (linearized) strain tensor.

### Standing assumptions {#standing-assumptions.unnumbered}

Throughout_the paper, we require

\[asm:standing\_assumptions\]

1.__The domain $\Omega \subset_\R^d$, $d = 3$ is_a bounded Lipschitz domain in the_sense