 is non-zero. This completes the proof of the theorem.

1.  The proof of Theorem\[cuplength\] actually shows that if some product $x=x_1\cdots x_t\neq 0$ with $1\leq \mathrm{deg}(x_i)\leq \ell$, then for any vector bundle $\xi$ over $X$ with $\mathrm{charrank}_X(\xi)\geq\ell$ some product of the Stiefel-Whitney classes of $\xi$ of length greater than or equal to $t$ is non-zero.

2.  The conclusion of Theorem\[cuplength\] is not true if $\mathrm{ucharrank}(X)<\mathrm{dim}(X)$. If $X=S^k$, $k\neq 1,2,4,8$, then $\mathrm{ucharrank}(X)=k-1<k$, $\mathrm{cup}(X)=1$ however $w(\xi)=1$ for any vector bundle $\xi$ over $X$.

[**Proof of Theorem\[maintheorem\].**]{} First note that the assumption $\mathrm{ucharrank}(X)\geq 1$ is odd clearly implies that the function $$f:\mathrm{Vect}_{\mathbb R}(X)\longrightarrow \mathbb Z_2$$ defined by $$f(\xi)=\mathrm{charrank}_X(\xi) ~~~~~(\mathrm{mod}~~~~~ 2)$$ is surjective. We shall now check that $f$ is a semi-group homomorphism. To see this, let $\xi$ and $\eta$ be two bundles over $X$. We have the following cases.

If $\xi$ and $\eta$ are both orientable, then so is $\xi\oplus\eta$. Hence $w_1(\xi\oplus\eta)=0$. As $r_X=1$, it follows that $\mathrm{charrank}_X(\xi\oplus\eta)=0$. The same argument shows that $\mathrm{charrank}_X(\xi)=0=\mathrm{charrank}_X(\eta)$. Thus in this case we have $f(\xi\oplus\eta)=f(\xi)+f(\eta)$.

Next suppose that both $\xi$ and $\eta$ are non-orientable. Then, on the one hand, $\xi\oplus\eta$ is orientable and hence $f(\xi\oplus\eta
is non - zero. This completes the proof of the theorem. 

 1.   The proof of Theorem\[cuplength\ ] actually shows that if some merchandise $ x = x_1\cdots x_t\neq 0 $ with $ 1\leq \mathrm{deg}(x_i)\leq \ell$, then for any vector package $ \xi$ over $ X$ with $ \mathrm{charrank}_X(\xi)\geq\ell$ some product of the Stiefel - Whitney classes of $ \xi$ of length great than or equal to $ t$ is non - zero. 

 2.   The conclusion of Theorem\[cuplength\ ] is not on-key if $ \mathrm{ucharrank}(X)<\mathrm{dim}(X)$. If $ adam = S^k$, $ k\neq 1,2,4,8 $, then $ \mathrm{ucharrank}(X)=k-1 < k$, $ \mathrm{cup}(X)=1 $ however $ w(\xi)=1 $ for any vector bundle $ \xi$ over $ X$. 

 [ * * validation of Theorem\[maintheorem\ ]. * * ] { } inaugural note that the presumption $ \mathrm{ucharrank}(X)\geq 1 $ is odd clearly entail that the function $ $ f:\mathrm{Vect}_{\mathbb R}(X)\longrightarrow \mathbb Z_2$$ defined by $ $ f(\xi)=\mathrm{charrank}_X(\xi) ~~~~~(\mathrm{mod}~~~~~ 2)$$ is surjective. We shall now check that $ f$ is a semi - group homomorphism. To see this, let $ \xi$ and $ \eta$ be two package over $ X$. We have the following cases. 

 If $ \xi$ and $ \eta$ are both orientable, then so is $ \xi\oplus\eta$. therefore $ w_1(\xi\oplus\eta)=0$. As $ r_X=1 $, it follows that $ \mathrm{charrank}_X(\xi\oplus\eta)=0$. The same controversy shows that $ \mathrm{charrank}_X(\xi)=0=\mathrm{charrank}_X(\eta)$. therefore in this case we consume $ f(\xi\oplus\eta)=f(\xi)+f(\eta)$. 

 Next suppose that both $ \xi$ and $ \eta$ are non - orientable. Then, on the one hand, $ \xi\oplus\eta$ is orientable and therefore $ f(\xi\oplus\eta
 is non-zero. This completes uhe proof of the jhworem.

1.  The pdoof of Gheorem\[cuplength\] actually shlww thau if some product $x=b_1\cdots x_t\jeq 0$ wity $1\lew \mathrm{deg}(e_j)\leq \ell$, then nor auy vector bundle $\xi$ over $X$ with $\mathrm{chdrfauk}_X(\xi)\geq\ell$ some product of the Stiesel-Whitmej classes of $\xy$ of jengfh greater than or equal to $t$ is nkn-zero.

2.  The conclusipn of Theorem\[cuplength\] is jot hrue if $\mathrm{uchagrank}(X)<\mathrn{dim}(V)$. If $X=S^k$, $k\neq 1,2,4,8$, then $\mathrm{ucharrank}(S)=k-1<k$, $\mathrm{cup}(X)=1$ however $w(\xi)=1$ for xny vzctor bundlg $\si$ mver $X$.

[**Proof of Treorem\[mainthcprem\].**]{} Fhrst noye that the asxum'tiob $\mathrm{ucharrank}(X)\geq 1$ is odd clearly iiplies thdt the function $$f:\marhem{Vecj}_{\mathtb R}(B)\oonerifhvardow \mahhbu Z_2$$ defined by $$f(\xi)=\mathem{charrank}_X(\xi) ~~~~~(\mathrk{mje}~~~~~ 2)$$ is surjectjve. We srall now check that $f$ is a semi-group hokomkrphism. To see this, let $\xi$ and $\eta$ be two bujdles ovew $X$. We have the following cases.

If $\xi$ and $\eta$ are toth kfieubwcoe, then so is $\xi\oplus\eta$. Hence $w_1(\xi\oplus\eta)=0$. As $r_V=1$, iu fpllows that $\mabhrm{charrank}_X(\xi\oplis\fts)=0$. The same argoment skkwa that $\mathrm{charrwnk}_X(\xi)=0=\mwthrm{xharrank}_X(\tta)$. Tnus in this case we have $f(\xu\oplus\eta)=f(\xi)+y(\etq)$.

Next suppose that both $\xi$ anb $\eta$ sre npn-orientable. Then, on thz one gand, $\xi\oplud\eta$ is odkentable and henze $n(\xi\mplus\eta
is non-zero. This completes the proof of 1. proof of actually shows that 0$ $1\leq \mathrm{deg}(x_i)\leq \ell$, for any vector $\xi$ over $X$ with $\mathrm{charrank}_X(\xi)\geq\ell$ some of the Stiefel-Whitney classes of $\xi$ of length greater than or equal to is non-zero. 2. The conclusion of Theorem\[cuplength\] is not true if $\mathrm{ucharrank}(X)<\mathrm{dim}(X)$. If $k\neq then $\mathrm{cup}(X)=1$ $w(\xi)=1$ for any vector bundle $\xi$ over $X$. [**Proof of Theorem\[maintheorem\].**]{} First note that the assumption 1$ is odd clearly implies that the function R}(X)\longrightarrow \mathbb Z_2$$ defined $$f(\xi)=\mathrm{charrank}_X(\xi) ~~~~~(\mathrm{mod}~~~~~ 2)$$ is surjective. shall check that is semi-group To see this, $\xi$ and $\eta$ be two bundles over $X$. We have the following cases. If $\xi$ and $\eta$ both orientable, is $\xi\oplus\eta$. $w_1(\xi\oplus\eta)=0$. $r_X=1$, follows that $\mathrm{charrank}_X(\xi\oplus\eta)=0$. argument shows that $\mathrm{charrank}_X(\xi)=0=\mathrm{charrank}_X(\eta)$. Thus in have $f(\xi\oplus\eta)=f(\xi)+f(\eta)$. Next suppose that both $\xi$ and are non-orientable. on the one hand, $\xi\oplus\eta$ is and hence $f(\xi\oplus\eta
 is non-zero. This completes the Proof of the TheorEm.

1.  THe pRoOf of theoRem\[cuplength\] acTUallY shows that if some producT $x=x_1\cdOtS X_t\neQ 0$ WiTh $1\leq \Mathrm{dEG}(x_I)\LEq \eLl$, ThEn fOr ANy VectoR buNdle $\xi$ oVer $X$ with $\maThrM{cHarrank}_X(\xi)\geQ\ElL$ some produCt oF the Stiefel-WHitNey claSsEs oF $\Xi$ of lEngTh greAter thAN or equAl to $t$ is noN-zERo.

2.  The cONclusioN OF THeorEm\[cuplength\] is not tRUe IF $\mathrm{ucharraNk}(X)<\matHrM{DiM}(x)$. if $X=s^k$, $k\Neq 1,2,4,8$, then $\matHrM{uchaRRank}(X)=k-1<k$, $\MAtHRM{Cup}(x)=1$ However $w(\xi)=1$ for Any vector buNDle $\Xi$ over $x$.

[**PRooF Of TheoRem\[maInTHeoRem\].**]{} First notE thaT the assumPtion $\mAThrm{uchARrank}(X)\gEq 1$ is odD clEarLy imPLiEs ThaT tHE fuNCtIon $$F:\MatHrm{Vect}_{\mAtHbB R}(X)\loNgriGHTARrow \MatHbb Z_2$$ DefinEd by $$f(\xi)=\mathrm{ChaRranK}_x(\xi) ~~~~~(\MathrM{mod}~~~~~ 2)$$ iS surJeCtive. we shalL now cHeCk that $f$ is a semi-gRoup HomomorphIsm. to See ThIs, let $\XI$ and $\etA$ be Two Bundles Over $X$. We HAve ThE FOLlOwing cases.

If $\xi$ and $\eTa$ ARE bOth orienTable, tHEn So IS $\xi\oplus\EtA$. HeNce $w_1(\XI\Oplus\Eta)=0$. AS $R_X=1$, It followS that $\mAThRm{CharranK}_X(\Xi\opluS\eTa)=0$. THe sAme arGUmenT shows That $\mathRm{chaRRank}_X(\xi)=0=\mathrm{cHArrank}_X(\eta)$. ThuS In THIs CAse wE haVe $f(\xi\oplus\eTa)=f(\xI)+F(\eta)$.

next SUpPosE That bOth $\xi$ AnD $\EtA$ Are non-orientable. TheN, oN the onE hand, $\Xi\oplus\eta$ is oRientable aND HEnce $f(\xi\oPlus\ETa
 is non-zero. This complet es the pro of of  th e t he orem .

1 .  The proof o f  The orem\[cuplength\] actu allysh o ws t h at  if s ome pro d uc t $x= x_ 1\ cdo ts x_ t\neq  0$  with $ 1\leq \mat hrm {d eg}(x_i)\leq \e ll$, thenfor  any vectorbun dle $\ xi $ o v er $X $ w ith $ \mathr m {charr ank}_X(\x i) \ geq\el l $ somep r od uctof the Stiefel-Wh i tn e y classes of $ \xi$ o fl en g t h g rea ter than o requal to $t$i sn o n -ze r o.

2.  The c onclusion o f  Th eorem\ [c upl e ngth\]  is n ot tru e if $\math rm{u charrank} (X)<\m a thrm{di m }(X)$.If $X= S^k $,$k\n e q1, 2,4 ,8 $ , t h en  $\ m ath rm{uchar ra nk }(X)= k-1< k $ , $\ma thr m{cu p}(X) =1$ however $ w(\ xi)= 1 $ f or an y vec torbu ndle$\xi$over$X $.

[**Proof of  The orem\[mai nth eo rem \] .**]{ }  First  no tethat th e assum p tio n$ \ m at hrm{ucharrank}(X)\ ge q 1$  is oddclearl y  i mp l ies that  t hefunc t i on $$ f:\m a th rm{Vect} _{\mat h bb  R }(X)\lo ng righta rr ow\ma thbbZ _2$$  defin ed by $$ f(\xi ) =\mathrm{charr a nk}_X(\xi) ~~ ~ ~~ ( \ ma t hrm{ mod }~~~~~ 2)$$  iss urje ctiv e .Wes hallnow c he c kt hat $f$ is a semi-g ro up hom omorp hism. To seethis, let$ \ x i$ and $ \eta $  b e  two bundles o ver $ X$. We hav e  the fol lowin g cases. 

If $\xi $ and $\et a$are  bo tho r ie ntable, thens o  is$\ xi\oplu s\e ta$. He nce  $w _1( \xi \o plus\eta) =0$. As$r _X =1 $,  it  foll o ws that$\ mat hr m{c harra n k}_X(\ xi\op lus\ et a) = 0$.  The sa m ea r gume nt  s hows  th at  $\ma thrm { cha rrank}_ X(\xi)=0= \ma t hrm{ ch ar rank}_X (\eta)$. Thus  i n this cas ewehave $ f ( \xi\oplu s\eta)=f(\xi)+f(\eta)$. 
Next s upp ose t hatboth $\xi $ a nd $\e ta$ are no n-orie ntabl e.  Th e n , ont h eone  h and, $\xi\ o p lus \eta$  i s or ientabl e and hence $f(\xi \ opl us\eta
 is_non-zero. This_completes the proof of_the theorem.

1.__The proof_of_Theorem\[cuplength\] actually shows_that if some_product $x=x_1\cdots x_t\neq 0$_with $1\leq \mathrm{deg}(x_i)\leq_\ell$,_then for any vector bundle $\xi$ over $X$ with $\mathrm{charrank}_X(\xi)\geq\ell$ some product of the_Stiefel-Whitney_classes of_$\xi$_of_length greater than or equal_to $t$ is non-zero.

2. _The conclusion_of Theorem\[cuplength\] is not true if $\mathrm{ucharrank}(X)<\mathrm{dim}(X)$. If_$X=S^k$,_$k\neq 1,2,4,8$, then_$\mathrm{ucharrank}(X)=k-1<k$, $\mathrm{cup}(X)=1$ however $w(\xi)=1$ for any vector bundle $\xi$_over $X$.

[**Proof of Theorem\[maintheorem\].**]{} First note_that the assumption_$\mathrm{ucharrank}(X)\geq_1$_is odd clearly implies_that the function $$f:\mathrm{Vect}_{\mathbb R}(X)\longrightarrow \mathbb_Z_2$$ defined by $$f(\xi)=\mathrm{charrank}_X(\xi) ~~~~~(\mathrm{mod}~~~~~ 2)$$_is surjective. We shall now check that_$f$ is a semi-group homomorphism. To_see this, let $\xi$ and_$\eta$ be_two bundles over $X$. We_have the following_cases.

If $\xi$_and $\eta$ are_both orientable, then so is $\xi\oplus\eta$._Hence $w_1(\xi\oplus\eta)=0$. As_$r_X=1$, it follows that $\mathrm{charrank}_X(\xi\oplus\eta)=0$. The_same_argument shows that_$\mathrm{charrank}_X(\xi)=0=\mathrm{charrank}_X(\eta)$._Thus_in this_case we have_$f(\xi\oplus\eta)=f(\xi)+f(\eta)$.

Next_suppose that_both_$\xi$ and $\eta$ are non-orientable. Then,_on_the one hand, $\xi\oplus\eta$ is orientable and_hence $f(\xi\oplus\eta