ars that have formed by the time that the simulation is stopped have yet commenced hydrogen burning. This justifies neglecting the effects of protostellar feedback in this study. Heating of the dust due to the significant accretion luminosities of the newly-formed protostars will occur (Krumholz 2006), but is unlikely to be important, as the temperature of the dust at the onset of dust-induced cooling is much higher than in a typical Galactic protostellar core ($T_{\rm{dust}}\sim 100~\rm{K}$ or more, compared to $\sim 10~\rm{K}$ in the Galactic case). The rapid collapse and fragmentation of the gas also leaves no time for dynamo amplification of magnetic fields (Tan & Blackman 2004), which in any case are expected to be weak and dynamically unimportant in primordial and very low metallicity gas (Widrow 2002). However, other authors suggest that the Biermann battery effect may amplify weak initial fields such that the magneto-rotational instability can influence the further collapse of the star (Silk & Langer 2006). Simulations by Xu et al. (2008) show that this effect yields peak magnetic fields of $1~\rm{nG}$ in the center of star-forming minihalos. Jets and outflows may reduce the final stellar mass by $3-10\%$ (Machida et al. 2006). In the presence of primordial fields, the magnetic pressure may even prevent star formation in minihalos and thus increase the mass scale of star-forming objects (Schleicher et al. 2008a,b).

The mass functions of the protostars at the end of the $Z=10^{-5}~\rm{Z}_{\odot}$ simulations (both high and low resolution cases) are shown in Figure 7. When the simulation is terminated, collapsed cores hold $\sim 19~\rm{M}_{\odot}$ of gas in total. The mass function peaks somewhere below $0.1~\rm{M}_{\odot}$ and ranges from below $0.01~\rm{M}_{\odot}$ to about $5~\rm{M}_{\odot}$. This is not the final protostellar mass function. The continuing accretion of gas by the cluster will alter the mass function, as will mergers between the newly-formed protostars (which cannot be followed using our current sink particle implementation). Protostellar feedback in the form of winds, jets and H [ii]{} regions may also play a role in determining the
ars that have formed by the time that the simulation is stop have so far commenced hydrogen burning. This justifies neglecting the impression of protostellar feedback in this study. Heating of the debris due to the significant accretion luminosities of the newly - formed protostars will happen (Krumholz 2006), but is improbable to be important, as the temperature of the debris at the onset of dust - induced cooling is a lot higher than in a typical astronomic protostellar core ($ T_{\rm{dust}}\sim 100~\rm{K}$ or more, compare to $ \sim 10~\rm{K}$ in the Galactic event). The rapid collapse and fragmentation of the gas besides leaves no time for dynamo amplification of charismatic fields (Tan & Blackman 2004), which in any sheath are expected to be decrepit and dynamically unimportant in primordial and very low metallicity accelerator (Widrow 2002). However, other authors suggest that the Biermann battery effect may amplify weak initial fields such that the magneto - rotational instability can influence the further collapse of the star (Silk & Langer 2006). Simulations by Xu et al. (2008) show that this effect yields peak charismatic plain of $ 1~\rm{nG}$ in the center of star topology - form minihalos. Jets and outflows may reduce the concluding stellar bulk by $ 3 - 10\%$ (Machida et al. 2006). In the presence of primordial field, the magnetic pressure may even prevent star formation in minihalos and therefore increase the mass scale of star - forming objects (Schleicher et al. 2008a, b). 

 The mass functions of the protostars at the goal of the $ Z=10^{-5}~\rm{Z}_{\odot}$ simulations (both high and low resolution cases) are indicate in Figure   7. When the simulation is terminated, collapsed core have $ \sim 19~\rm{M}_{\odot}$ of gas in total. The aggregate function peaks somewhere below $ 0.1~\rm{M}_{\odot}$ and ranges from below $ 0.01~\rm{M}_{\odot}$ to about $ 5~\rm{M}_{\odot}$. This is not the final protostellar batch function. The cover accretion of gas by the bunch will alter the mass affair, as will mergers between the newly - formed protostars (which cannot be trace using our current cesspool particle implementation). Protostellar feedback in the form of winds, jets and H   [ ii ] { } regions may also play a role in determine the
ars that have formed by the time that the simulatmon is atopped fave yet commenced hydrogen uurnung. Tyis justifies neglectivg the efvects of prouostellar feedback in this studg. Heaciig of the dust cue to the significant awcfecion luminosities of the newly-formed protosyags will occur (Hrumnjlz 2006), but is unlikely to be important, aa the ttmperature of the cust at the onset of dust-ijducfd cooling is much higher thab in q typical Gauactic prouovtellar cote ($T_{\rm{dust}}\sim 100~\rm{K}$ or more, compardd to $\sim 10~\rm{K}$ ib rhe Calactic cawe). Thv rapid collaixe and fragmemtation of the gav aoso leaves no time foc dynamo amplificatijn of magtecic fields (Tan & Blacknab 2004), whhch hn avt cxse ace sxpectfd vo be weak znd dynamicqlly unimportant in pwpkordial and bery ljw metallicity gas (Widrow 2002). However, other dutgors suggest that the Buermann battery effecj may amplyfy weak initial fields such that the magneto-rotadionam inwtwcullty can influence the further collapse of the atsr (Silk & Langer 2006). Simulationx hy Vu et al. (2008) shod that thjs effect yields pfak maggetic fields os $1~\rm{mG}$ in the center of star-forning minihaljw. Jets and outflowd may reducz the ginal stellar mass by $3-10\%$ (Machiba et zl. 2006). In the oresence kw primordial fieuds, tve magneukc pressure may eden preveit stcr formagion in migihalos anf thus increase the mass scalg of sdar-forming objects (Schleicher et al. 2008a,b).

The mass functionx mf nhe protoftars at the end os the $Z=10^{-5}~\rm{Z}_{\odot}$ simulacions (coth high znd low resolution cases) are shman in Figure 7. When thq sinularion is germinated, colkapsed cogef hood $\sim 19~\rm{M}_{\odot}$ of nas iv total. The mass fubction peaks sokewferq hekor $0.1~\rm{M}_{\odot}$ and ranees grom celow $0.01~\rm{M}_{\odig}$ to about $5~\rm{M}_{\odot}$. This hs nkt the final protoxtcllar masw functijn. The continiing accretion of has bb the rlustet wyll alter the mass function, as will merherf between thq neqly-formed prptostars (which cannot be followed using our current sink particle implementajiok). Protosteller feeqback in dhe form of winds, jers and H [ii]{} regionx may also play a rols in datermlning the
ars that have formed by the time simulation stopped have commenced hydrogen burning. of feedback in this Heating of the due to the significant accretion luminosities the newly-formed protostars will occur (Krumholz 2006), but is unlikely to be important, the temperature of the dust at the onset of dust-induced cooling is much than a Galactic core ($T_{\rm{dust}}\sim 100~\rm{K}$ or more, compared to $\sim 10~\rm{K}$ in the Galactic case). The rapid collapse fragmentation of the gas also leaves no time dynamo amplification of magnetic (Tan & Blackman 2004), which any are expected be and unimportant in primordial very low metallicity gas (Widrow 2002). However, other authors suggest that the Biermann battery effect may amplify initial fields the magneto-rotational can the collapse of the & Langer 2006). Simulations by Xu show that this effect yields peak magnetic fields $1~\rm{nG}$ in center of star-forming minihalos. Jets and may reduce the final stellar mass by $3-10\%$ et al. 2006). In the presence of primordial fields, the magnetic pressure may even prevent in minihalos and thus the mass scale star-forming (Schleicher al. The mass of the protostars at the end of the $Z=10^{-5}~\rm{Z}_{\odot}$ simulations (both and low resolution cases) are shown in Figure 7. When is collapsed cores hold 19~\rm{M}_{\odot}$ of gas in The function peaks somewhere below ranges below $5~\rm{M}_{\odot}$. is the final protostellar mass The continuing accretion of gas the cluster will alter mergers between the newly-formed protostars (which cannot be using our current sink particle implementation). Protostellar in the form of winds, jets and H [ii]{} regions may also a role the
ars that have formed by the timE that the siMulatIon Is sToPped Have Yet commenced hyDRogeN burning. This justifies nEglecTiNG the EFfEcts oF protosTElLAR feEdBaCk iN tHIs Study. heaTing of tHe dust due tO thE sIgnificant acCReTion luminoSitIes of the newlY-foRmed prOtOstARs wilL ocCur (KrUmholz 2006), BUt is unLikely to bE iMPortanT, As the teMPErAturE of the dust at the onSEt OF dust-induced coOling iS mUCh HIGheR thAn in a typicAl galacTIc protoSTeLLAR coRE ($T_{\rm{dust}}\sim 100~\rm{k}$ or more, compARed To $\sim 10~\rM{K}$ In tHE GalacTic caSe). tHe rApid collapsE and FragmentaTion of THe gas alSO leaves No time For DynAmo aMPlIfIcaTiON of MAgNetIC fiElds (Tan & BLaCkMan 2004), whIch iN ANY Case Are ExpeCted tO be weak and dynAmiCallY UniMportAnt in PrimOrDial aNd very Low meTaLlicity gas (WidroW 2002). HowEver, other AutHoRs sUgGest tHAt the BIerManN batterY effect MAy aMpLIFY wEak initial fields suCh THAt The magneTo-rotaTIoNaL InstabilItY caN infLUEnce tHe fuRThEr collapSe of thE StAr (silk & LanGeR 2006). SimulAtIonS by xu et aL. (2008) Show That thIs effect YieldS Peak magnetic fiELds of $1~\rm{nG}$ in thE CeNTEr OF staR-foRming minihaLos. JETs anD outFLoWs mAY reduCe the FiNAl STellar mass by $3-10\%$ (Machida Et Al. 2006). In thE presEnce of primordIal fields, tHE MAgnetic pRessURe MAy even prevent sTar foRmation in mINihalos aNd thuS increasE the mass sCALe of star-ForMinG obJecTS (scHleicher et al. 2008a,B).

tHe maSs FunctioNs oF the proTosTarS at The EnD of the $Z=10^{-5}~\rm{z}_{\odot}$ simUlAtIoNs (BotH high ANd low resOlUtiOn CasEs) are SHown in figurE 7. WheN tHe SImuLation iS TeRMInatEd, CoLlapSed CoRes hoLd $\siM 19~\Rm{M}_{\Odot}$ of gAs in total. the MAss fUnCtIon peakS somewhere belOw $0.1~\Rm{M}_{\odot}$ and RaNgeS from bELOw $0.01~\rm{M}_{\odoT}$ to about $5~\rm{M}_{\odot}$. This is noT The finaL prOtostEllaR mass funcTioN. The coNtiNUing acCretioN of gaS bY thE CLusteR WIlL alTeR the mass fuNCTioN, as wiLl MergErs betwEen the newly-formed pROtoStars (which canNot Be foLLOwEd uSInG Our CuRRenT SInk particle implEmentation). prOToStellar feeDBacK iN the forM of windS, jets ANd H [ii]{} reGions may aLso play a rOlE in dETErmIning the
ars that have formed by th e time tha t the  si mul at ionis s topped have ye t  com menced hydrogen burnin g. Th is just i fi es ne glectin g  t h e  ef fe ct s o fp ro toste lla r feedb ack in thi s s tu dy. Heatingo fthe dust d ueto the signi fic ant ac cr eti o n lum ino sitie s of t h e newl y-formedpr o tostar s  will o c c ur  (Kr umholz 2006), but is unlikely to be  impor ta n t, a s t hetemperatur eof th e  dust a t  t h e ons e t of dust-ind uced coolin g  is  muchhi ghe r  thanin aty p ica l Galacticprot ostellarcore ( $ T_{\rm{ d ust}}\s im 100 ~\r m{K }$ o r  m or e,co m par e dto$ \si m 10~\rm {K }$  in t he G a l a c ticcas e).The r apid collapse  an d fr a gme ntati on of  the  g as al so lea ves n otime for dynamo  amp lificatio n o fmag ne tic f i elds ( Tan  &Blackma n 2004) ,  wh ic h i nany case are expec te d to  be weak  and d y na mi c ally uni mp ort anti n  prim ordi a land very  low m e ta ll icity g as  (Widr ow  20 02) . How e ver,  other  authors  sugg e st that the Bi e rmann battery ef f e ct mayamp lify weak i niti a l fi elds su cht hat t he ma gn e to - rotational instabil it y caninflu ence the furt her collap s e of the s tar( Si l k & Langer 200 6). S imulations by Xu et  al.(2008) s how thatt h is effec t y iel dspea k ma gnetic fields o f $1 ~\ rm{nG}$  in  the ce nte r o f s tar -f orming mi nihalos.  J et san d o utflo w s may re du ceth e f inals tellar  mass  by$3 -1 0 \%$  (Machi d ae t  al.  2 00 6).Inth e pre senc e  of  primor dial fiel ds, thema gn etic pr essure may ev en  prevent s ta r f ormati o n  in mini halos and thus increase the mas s s caleof s tar-formi ngobject s ( S chleic her et  al.20 08a , b ).

T h e  m ass  f unctions o f the  prot os tars  at the  end of the $Z=10^ { -5} ~\rm{Z}_{\odo t}$  sim u l at ion s  ( b oth  h i gha n d low resolutio n cases) a re sh own in Fig u re7.  When t he simu latio n  is ter minated,collapsed  c ores h old  $\sim 19~ \rm{M}_{ \odot}$ o f  gasi ntotal . T he mas sfun ction  peaks som ewher e belo w$0.1~\ rm{M} _{ \odot}$and ranges from below $ 0.01~\ rm{M} _{\ odot}$ to  ab o ut$5~\rm{M} _{\o dot}$. Thi s i s n ot th e f i nal p roto s te lla r  mass  fun c tion. The co nti n u in g accretion o f  ga s bythe cluste r wi ll alter the mass function, as w illm e rge rsb etwe en  the newly-for med  p r o tostars(w hich cannot  be foll ow e d usi ng our  curre nt sink p ar t icle i mple men tation).Pro to s tellarfe ed b ack in  the  f orm of  winds ,  jet s and H [ii]{} reg ionsm a y als o  pl ay aro le in d e term ining the
ars that_have formed_by the time that_the simulation_is_stopped have_yet_commenced hydrogen burning._This justifies neglecting_the effects of protostellar_feedback in this_study._Heating of the dust due to the significant accretion luminosities of the newly-formed protostars_will_occur (Krumholz_2006),_but_is unlikely to be important,_as the temperature of the_dust at_the onset of dust-induced cooling is much higher_than_in a typical_Galactic protostellar core ($T_{\rm{dust}}\sim 100~\rm{K}$ or more, compared to_$\sim 10~\rm{K}$ in the Galactic case)._The rapid collapse_and_fragmentation_of the gas also_leaves no time for dynamo amplification_of magnetic fields (Tan & Blackman_2004), which in any case are expected_to be weak and dynamically unimportant_in primordial and very low_metallicity gas_(Widrow 2002). However, other authors_suggest that the_Biermann battery_effect may amplify_weak initial fields such that the_magneto-rotational instability can_influence the further collapse of the_star_(Silk & Langer_2006)._Simulations_by Xu_et al. (2008)_show_that this_effect_yields peak magnetic fields of $1~\rm{nG}$_in_the center of star-forming minihalos. Jets and_outflows may reduce the_final_stellar mass by $3-10\%$_(Machida et al. 2006). In_the presence of primordial fields, the_magnetic pressure_may even_prevent star formation in minihalos and thus increase the mass scale_of star-forming objects (Schleicher et al._2008a,b).

The mass functions of_the protostars_at_the end of_the_$Z=10^{-5}~\rm{Z}_{\odot}$ simulations_(both high and low resolution cases) are_shown in_Figure 7. When the simulation is terminated,_collapsed cores hold $\sim_19~\rm{M}_{\odot}$_of gas in total. The mass_function peaks somewhere below $0.1~\rm{M}_{\odot}$ and_ranges from below $0.01~\rm{M}_{\odot}$ to_about_$5~\rm{M}_{\odot}$._This is not the final_protostellar mass function. The continuing accretion_of gas by_the cluster will alter the mass function,_as_will mergers between the newly-formed protostars_(which_cannot be followed using our current_sink_particle_implementation). Protostellar feedback in the_form of winds, jets and H [ii]{}_regions may also play a role in determining the