&\equiv& k^2+a^2(\eta)(m_{\chi}^2-2H^2)  \nonumber \\
&\sim& k^2-2a^2(\eta)H^2<0.\end{aligned}$$ And, since these modes turn out to be the ones which are most important in order to calculate the relevant quantities [@li05; @v83], we would finally conclude that the diagonalization method is not the most appropriate one to be used in this case. What is more, in order to compute the desired quantity, the authors calculate $\rho_{\chi}/m_{\chi}$ numerically. However, $\rho_{\chi}$ is known to be a divergent quantity, if the field is not conformally coupled (see, e.g., [@b80]). It must necessarily be renormalized previously, what renders utmost difficult to develop a rigorous procedure in order to perform such calculation numerically.

This investigation has been supported in part by MICINN (Spain), projects MTM2011-27739-C04-01, FIS2006-02842 and FIS2010-15640, by CPAN Consolider Ingenio Project, and by AGAUR (Generalitat de Catalunya), contracts 2009SGR-345 and 2009SGR-994.

[99]{}

D.J.H. Chung, E.W. Kolb and A. Riotto, Phys. Rev. [**D59**]{}, 023501 (1998), hep-ph/9802238; Phys. Rev. Lett. [**81**]{}, 4048 (1998), hep-ph/9805473. V. Kuzmin and I. Tkachev, Phys. Rev. [**D59**]{}, 123006 (1999), hep-ph/9809547. G. Felder, L. Kovman and A. Linde, JHEP 0002:027 (2000), hep-ph/9909508. F. Finelli, G. Marozzi, A.A. Starobinsky, G.P. Vacca and G. Venturi, Phys. Rev. [**D79**]{}, 044007 (2009), hep-th/0808.1786. V. Mukhanov, [*Physical fundations of cosmology*]{} (Cambridge University Press, 2005). A. Linde, [*Particle Physics and Inflationary Cosmology*]{} (Harwood, Chur, Switzerland, 1990), hep-
& \equiv & k^2+a^2(\eta)(m_{\chi}^2 - 2H^2)   \nonumber \\ 
 & \sim & k^2 - 2a^2(\eta)H^2<0.\end{aligned}$$ And, since these modes turn out to be the ones which are most authoritative in decree to calculate the relevant quantities [ @li05; @v83 ], we would finally reason that the diagonalization method is not the most appropriate one to be used in this font. What is more, in order to compute the desire quantity, the authors count $ \rho_{\chi}/m_{\chi}$ numerically. However, $ \rho_{\chi}$ is known to be a divergent quantity, if the playing field is not conformally coupled (visualize, e.g., [ @b80 ]). It must necessarily be normalize previously, what renders utmost difficult to develop a rigorous routine in order to perform such calculation numerically. 

 This probe has been supported in region by MICINN (Spain), projects MTM2011 - 27739 - C04 - 01, FIS2006 - 02842 and FIS2010 - 15640, by CPAN Consolider Ingenio Project, and by AGAUR (Generalitat de Catalunya), contracts 2009SGR-345 and 2009SGR-994. 

 [ 99 ] { } 

 D.J.H. Chung, E.W. Kolb and A. Riotto, Phys. Rev. [ * * D59 * * ] { }, 023501 (1998), hep - ph/9802238; Phys. Rev. Lett. [ * * 81 * * ] { }, 4048 (1998), hep - ph/9805473. V. Kuzmin and I. Tkachev, Phys. Rev. [ * * D59 * * ] { }, 123006 (1999), hep - ph/9809547. G. Felder, L. Kovman and A. Linde, JHEP 0002:027 (2000), hep - ph/9909508. F. Finelli, G. Marozzi, A.A. Starobinsky, G.P. Vacca and G. Venturi, Phys. Rev. [ * * D79 * * ] { }, 044007 (2009), hep - th/0808.1786. V. Mukhanov, [ * Physical fundations of cosmology * ] { } (Cambridge University Press, 2005). A. Linde, [ * Particle Physics and Inflationary Cosmology * ] { } (Harwood, Chur, Switzerland, 1990), hep-
&\equlv& k^2+a^2(\eta)(m_{\chi}^2-2H^2)  \nonumber \\
&\rim& k^2-2a^2(\eta)H^2<0.\end{alntned}$$ Aid, sincs these oodes turn out to be the oned qhich are most important in order to calculare tie relevant quanvjties [@ll05; @v83], ws wounv finally conclode that the diagonalizatimn mzthod is not the most appropriate onq to be uded in this cafe. Wnwt ia more, in order to compute the desjred quentity, the authprs calculate $\rho_{\chi}/m_{\chi}$ nkmerlcally. However, $\rho_{\fhi}$ is knowb to ve a divergevt quantitj, if the figld is not conformally coupled (sde, e.g., [@b80]). It must nwcedvarily be rxnormajized previomxly, whdt rendrrs utmost difniculv to develop a rigorous pcocedure in order to perform vueh calculation numerixaoly.

Thhs itvesgugagioh ias been dup'orted in pzrt by MICIBN (Spain), projects MUM2011-27739-C04-01, DIS2006-02842 and FIS2010-15640, bg CPAN Cjnsolider Ingenio Project, and by AGAUR (Censralitat de Catalunya), cintracts 2009SGR-345 and 2009SGR-994.

[99]{}

D.U.H. Chung, Q.W. Kolb and A. Riotto, Phys. Rev. [**D59**]{}, 023501 (1998), hep-ph/9802238; Phys. Rev. Nett. [**81**]{}, 4048 (1998), htp-im/9805473. V. Yyzlin and I. Tkachev, Phys. Rev. [**D59**]{}, 123006 (1999), hep-ph/9809547. G. Felder, M. Lonman and A. Linde, MHEP 0002:027 (2000), hep-ph/9909508. F. Finrlpi, D. Marozzi, A.A. Rtarobnhsiy, G.P. Vacca and G. Genturi, Phys. Rev. [**D79**]{}, 044007 (2009), rep-tn/0808.1786. V. Mukhanov, [*Physical fundarions of cosiilogy*]{} (Cambridge Unnversity Prers, 2005). S. Lince, [*Particle Physics and Infmationary Clsmology*]{} (Gxrwood, Chur, Switxerkatd, 1990), hep-
&\equiv& k^2+a^2(\eta)(m_{\chi}^2-2H^2) \nonumber \\ &\sim& k^2-2a^2(\eta)H^2<0.\end{aligned}$$ And, modes out to the ones which to the relevant quantities @v83], we would conclude that the diagonalization method is the most appropriate one to be used in this case. What is more, order to compute the desired quantity, the authors calculate $\rho_{\chi}/m_{\chi}$ numerically. However, $\rho_{\chi}$ known be divergent if the field is not conformally coupled (see, e.g., [@b80]). It must necessarily be renormalized previously, renders utmost difficult to develop a rigorous procedure order to perform such numerically. This investigation has been in by MICINN projects FIS2006-02842 FIS2010-15640, by CPAN Ingenio Project, and by AGAUR (Generalitat de Catalunya), contracts 2009SGR-345 and 2009SGR-994. [99]{} D.J.H. Chung, E.W. Kolb A. Riotto, [**D59**]{}, 023501 hep-ph/9802238; Rev. [**81**]{}, 4048 (1998), Kuzmin and I. Tkachev, Phys. Rev. hep-ph/9809547. G. Felder, L. Kovman and A. Linde, 0002:027 (2000), F. Finelli, G. Marozzi, A.A. Starobinsky, Vacca and G. Venturi, Phys. Rev. [**D79**]{}, 044007 hep-th/0808.1786. V. Mukhanov, [*Physical fundations of cosmology*]{} (Cambridge University Press, 2005). A. Linde, [*Particle Physics Cosmology*]{} (Harwood, Chur, Switzerland, hep-
&\equiv& k^2+a^2(\eta)(m_{\chi}^2-2H^2)  \nonumber \\
&\siM& k^2-2a^2(\eta)H^2<0.\end{AlignEd}$$ ANd, sInCe thEse mOdes turn out to bE The oNes which are most importaNt in oRdER to cALcUlate The releVAnT QUanTiTiEs [@lI05; @v83], WE wOuld fInaLly concLude that thE diAgOnalization mEThOd is not the MosT appropriate One To be usEd In tHIs casE. WhAt is mOre, in oRDer to cOmpute the DeSIred quANtity, thE AUtHors Calculate $\rho_{\chi}/m_{\cHI}$ nUMerically. HowevEr, $\rho_{\cHi}$ IS kNOWn tO be A divergent QuAntitY, If the fiELd IS NOt cONformally coupLed (see, e.g., [@b80]). It MUst NecessArIly BE renorMalizEd PRevIously, what rEndeRs utmost dIfficuLT to deveLOp a rigoRous prOceDurE in oRDeR tO peRfORm sUCh CalCUlaTion numeRiCaLly.

ThIs inVESTIgatIon Has bEen suPported in part By MiCINn (spaIn), proJects mTM2011-27739-C04-01, fIs2006-02842 and FiS2010-15640, by CPaN ConSoLider Ingenio ProJect, And by AGAUr (GeNeRalItAt de CATalunyA), coNtrActs 2009SGR-345 And 2009SGR-994.

[99]{}

D.j.h. ChUnG, e.w. koLb and A. Riotto, Phys. ReV. [**D59**]{}, 023501 (1998), HEP-pH/9802238; Phys. Rev. lett. [**81**]{}, 4048 (1998), heP-Ph/9805473. v. KUZmin and I. tkAchEv, PhYS. rev. [**D59**]{}, 123006 (1999), hEp-ph/9809547. g. feLder, L. KovMan and a. liNdE, JHEP 0002:027 (2000), heP-pH/9909508. F. FineLlI, G. MAroZzi, A.A. sTaroBinsky, g.P. Vacca aNd G. VeNTuri, Phys. Rev. [**D79**]{}, 044007 (2009), heP-Th/0808.1786. V. Mukhanov, [*PhYSiCAL fUNdatIonS of cosmologY*]{} (CamBRidgE UniVErSitY press, 2005). a. LindE, [*PARtICle Physics and InflatIoNary CoSmoloGy*]{} (Harwood, Chur, switzerlanD, 1990), HEP-
&\equiv& k^2+a^2(\eta)(m_{ \chi}^2-2H ^2) \no num be r \\ 
&\s im& k^2-2a^2(\ e ta)H ^2<0.\end{aligned}$$ A nd, s in c e th e se  mode s turno ut t o b eth e o ne s  w hichare  most i mportant i n o rd er to calcul a te  the relev ant  quantities[@l i05; @ v8 3], we wo uld  fina lly co n cludethat thedi a gonali z ation m e t ho d is  not the most app r op r iate one to be  usedin th i s  ca se.  What is m or e, in order t o  c o m p ute the desired q uantity, th e  au thorsca lcu l ate $\ rho_{ \c h i}/ m_{\chi}$ n umer ically. H owever ,  $\rho_ { \chi}$is kno wntobe a di ve rge nt qua n ti ty, ifthe fiel dis  notconf o r m a llycou pled  (see , e.g., [@b80 ]).  Itm ust  nece ssari ly b erenor malize d pre vi ously, what ren ders  utmost d iff ic ult  t o dev e lop arig oro us proc edure i n  or de r t operform such calcu la t i on  numeric ally.Th is investig at ion  has b een s uppo r te d in par t by M I CI NN  (Spain ),  proje ct s M TM2 011-2 7 739- C04-01 , FIS200 6-028 4 2 and FIS2010- 1 5640, by CPAN Co n s ol i derIng enio Projec t, a n d by  AGA U R(Ge n erali tat d eC at a lunya), contracts 2 00 9SGR-3 45 an d 2009SGR-994 .

[99]{}D . J.H. Chu ng,E .W .  Kolb and A. R iotto , Phys. Re v . [**D59 **]{} , 023501  (1998),h e p-ph/980 223 8;Phy s.R e v.  Lett. [**81* * ] {},40 48 (199 8),  hep-ph /98 054 73.  V.  K uzmin and  I. Tkac he v,  P hy s.Rev.[ **D59**] {} , 1 23 006  (199 9 ), hep -ph/9 8095 47 .G . F elder,L .K o vman  a nd  A.Lin de , JHE P 00 0 2:0 27 (200 0), hep-p h/9 9 0950 8.  F . Finel li, G. Marozz i,  A.A. Star ob ins ky, G. P .  Vacca a nd G. Venturi, Phys. Re v . [**D7 9** ]{},0440 07 (2009) , h ep-th/ 080 8 .1786.  V. Mu khano v,  [* P h ysica l fu nda ti ons of cos m o log y*]{}  ( Camb ridge U niversity Press, 2 0 05) . A. Linde, [ *Pa rtic l e  P hys i cs and  I n fla t i onary Cosmology *]{} (Harw oo d ,Chur, Swit z erl an d, 1990 ), hep- 
&\equiv& k^2+a^2(\eta)(m_{\chi}^2-2H^2)_ \nonumber_\\
&\sim& k^2-2a^2(\eta)H^2<0.\end{aligned}$$ And, since_these modes_turn_out to_be_the ones which_are most important_in order to calculate_the relevant quantities_[@li05;_@v83], we would finally conclude that the diagonalization method is not the most appropriate_one_to be_used_in_this case. What is more,_in order to compute the_desired quantity,_the authors calculate $\rho_{\chi}/m_{\chi}$ numerically. However, $\rho_{\chi}$ is_known_to be a_divergent quantity, if the field is not conformally coupled_(see, e.g., [@b80]). It must necessarily_be renormalized previously,_what_renders_utmost difficult to develop_a rigorous procedure in order to_perform such calculation numerically.

This investigation has_been supported in part by MICINN (Spain),_projects MTM2011-27739-C04-01, FIS2006-02842 and FIS2010-15640, by_CPAN Consolider Ingenio Project, and_by AGAUR_(Generalitat de Catalunya), contracts 2009SGR-345_and 2009SGR-994.

[99]{}

D.J.H. Chung,_E.W. Kolb_and A. Riotto,_Phys. Rev. [**D59**]{}, 023501 (1998), hep-ph/9802238;_Phys. Rev. Lett._[**81**]{}, 4048 (1998), hep-ph/9805473. V. Kuzmin_and_I. Tkachev, Phys._Rev._[**D59**]{},_123006 (1999),_hep-ph/9809547. G. Felder,_L._Kovman and_A._Linde, JHEP 0002:027 (2000), hep-ph/9909508. F._Finelli,_G. Marozzi, A.A. Starobinsky, G.P. Vacca and_G. Venturi, Phys. Rev._[**D79**]{},_044007 (2009), hep-th/0808.1786. V._Mukhanov, [*Physical fundations of cosmology*]{}_(Cambridge University Press, 2005). A. Linde,_[*Particle Physics_and Inflationary_Cosmology*]{} (Harwood, Chur, Switzerland, 1990), hep-