\right) =\left\langle \hat{a}_{A}^{\dag }\hat{a}%
_{A}\right\rangle =\sum_{k,l}k\left\vert C_{kl}\left( t\right) \right\vert
^{2},\quad
\sigma \left( N_{A}\right) =\sqrt{%
\sum_{k,l}k^{2}\left\vert C_{kl}\left( t\right) \right\vert ^{2}-\left(
\sum_{k,l}k\left\vert C_{kl}\left( t\right) \right\vert ^{2}\right) ^{2}}.$$Fig.\[figure11\] calculates the dynamics of the mean values and their corresponding fluctuations, and it shows that the quantum fluctuations (which are omitted in a classical dynamics) still play an important roles in the synchronized behaviors in this case. For a coherent-state BEC, two scattering modes can quickly reach an exact CS in a sense of $x_{-}\rightarrow 0, p_{-}\rightarrow 0$ (see Fig.\[figure11\] (a)(b)) but their fluctuations present “collapse and revival" behaviors and will remain for a long time due to the weak dissipations of the BEC scattering modes. But for a trapping truncation of $%
n=1-g/\chi\approx 10$, the two modes hardly reach to a complete CS but more irregular fluctuations are produced than that in the number-state BECs (see Fig.\[figure7\](d)(e)(f))because two scattering modes generated in the number-state BECs will no longer trap themselves in their initial states within their respective Hilbert space of $\mathcal{H}_N$ and the mode mixing between different number-state BECs will be involved.

![The dynamical measure synchronization of (a)(b) $S_{c}(t)$ and (c)(d) the mutual information $I_{AB}(t)$ in the whole Hilbert space of $\bigoplus_{N}%
\mathcal{H}_{N}$ for $N=0,1,2,\cdots,n$. The truncated number $n=15$ for (a) (c) and $n=10$ for (b)(d). The other parameters are the same as that in Fig.\[figure8\] and Fig.\[figure9\]. Insets: the zoomed-in images from the dashed rectangles.[]{data-label="figure12"}](Fig13a.pdf
\right) = \left\langle \hat{a}_{A}^{\dag } \hat{a}% 
 _ { A}\right\rangle = \sum_{k, l}k\left\vert C_{kl}\left (t\right) \right\vert 
 ^{2},\quad 
 \sigma \left (N_{A}\right) = \sqrt{% 
 \sum_{k, l}k^{2}\left\vert C_{kl}\left (t\right) \right\vert ^{2}-\left (
 \sum_{k, l}k\left\vert C_{kl}\left (t\right) \right\vert ^{2}\right) ^{2}}.$$Fig.\[figure11\ ] calculates the dynamics of the mean values and their comparable fluctuation, and it shows that the quantum fluctuations (which are exclude in a authoritative dynamics) still play an significant roles in the synchronized behavior in this case. For a coherent - state BEC, two scatter modes can quickly pass an accurate CS in a sense of $ x_{-}\rightarrow 0, p_{-}\rightarrow 0 $ (visualize Fig.\[figure11\ ] (a)(b) ) but their fluctuations present “ collapse and revival " behavior and will remain for a long time due to the decrepit dissipations of the BEC scattering modes. But for a trapping shortness of $% 
 n=1 - g/\chi\approx 10 $, the two modes barely reach to a complete CS but more irregular variation are produced than that in the number - state BECs (see Fig.\[figure7\](d)(e)(f))because two scattering mood beget in the number - state BECs will no longer trap themselves in their initial states within their respective Hilbert space of $ \mathcal{H}_N$ and the mode mixing between different number - state of matter BECs will be involved. 

! [ The dynamical standard synchronism of (a)(b) $ S_{c}(t)$ and (c)(d) the mutual information $ I_{AB}(t)$ in the whole Hilbert space of $ \bigoplus_{N}% 
 \mathcal{H}_{N}$ for $ N=0,1,2,\cdots, n$. The truncated number $ n=15 $ for (a) (c) and $ n=10 $ for (b)(d). The other argument are the same as that in Fig.\[figure8\ ] and Fig.\[figure9\ ]. Insets: the zoomed - in images from the dashed rectangles.[]{data - label="figure12"}](Fig13a.pdf
\rigjt) =\left\langle \hat{a}_{A}^{\dag }\hxt{a}%
_{A}\right\rangle =\sum_{k,l}k\neft\vedt C_{kl}\lewt( t\right) \right\vert
^{2},\quad
\sigma \lwft( N_{Q}\right) =\sqrt{%
\sum_{k,l}k^{2}\left\vdrt C_{kl}\levt( t\righr) \rijht\vert ^{2}-\left(
\sum_{k,l}k\left\vevc C_{kl}\mcft( t\xijht) \right\vert ^{2}\rlght) ^{2}}.$$Fig.\[figgre11\] calculates tfe dynamics of the mean values and thqir cortedponding fluctoatiomf, ans it shows that the quantum fluctuztions (xhich are omittrd in a classical dynamics) stipl play an importajt roles in the wynchronized behaviors in this casg. For a coherent-state BEC, two scxtternng modes cqn qulwkly reach en exabt CS in a sekxe of $f_{-}\rightatrow 0, p_{-}\rightarvow 0$ (vee Fig.\[figure11\] (a)(b)) but themr fluctuations presgnt “collapve and revival" behaciirs atd whll fwmakn roc a long himx due to ths weak dissupations of the BEC ssqttering modea. But sow a trapping truncation of $%
n=1-g/\chi\approx 10$, ths two modes hardly reacy to a complete CS buj more irrqgular fluctuations are produced than that in the numbxr-rtaue BECs (wef Fig.\[figure7\](d)(e)(f))because two scattering modes gegsrstvd in the number-sbate BECs will no kojgrt trap themselxes in thsir initial states within theie respectyve Nilbert space of $\mathcal{H}_N$ qnd the mode nixing between difyerent numbex-state BECs will be involved.

![The dyuamicam measure sjnchronizzgion of (a)(b) $S_{c}(t)$ avd (b)(d) tve mutual information $I_{AB}(t)$ in the wiole Kilbert rpacg of $\bidoplus_{N}%
\matjcal{H}_{K}$ for $N=0,1,2,\cdots,n$. The tguncajed nukber $n=15$ for (a) (c) and $n=10$ for (b)(d). The other pareketers are tne sake as thct in Nig.\[figure8\] and Fyg.\[figure9\]. Insetx: the zjomed-kn images rrom thx dashed receangles.[]{data-latgl="figure12"}](Fig13a.pvf
\right) =\left\langle \hat{a}_{A}^{\dag }\hat{a}% _{A}\right\rangle =\sum_{k,l}k\left\vert C_{kl}\left( ^{2},\quad \left( N_{A}\right) \sum_{k,l}k^{2}\left\vert C_{kl}\left( t\right) \right\vert ^{2}}.$$Fig.\[figure11\] calculates the of the mean and their corresponding fluctuations, and it that the quantum fluctuations (which are omitted in a classical dynamics) still play important roles in the synchronized behaviors in this case. For a coherent-state BEC, scattering can reach exact CS in a sense of $x_{-}\rightarrow 0, p_{-}\rightarrow 0$ (see Fig.\[figure11\] (a)(b)) but their fluctuations “collapse and revival" behaviors and will remain for long time due to weak dissipations of the BEC modes. for a truncation $% 10$, the two hardly reach to a complete CS but more irregular fluctuations are produced than that in the number-state (see Fig.\[figure7\](d)(e)(f))because modes generated the BECs no longer trap their initial states within their respective $\mathcal{H}_N$ and the mode mixing between different number-state will be ![The dynamical measure synchronization of (a)(b) and (c)(d) the mutual information $I_{AB}(t)$ in the Hilbert space of $\bigoplus_{N}% \mathcal{H}_{N}$ for $N=0,1,2,\cdots,n$. The truncated number $n=15$ for (a) (c) and (b)(d). The other parameters the same as in and Insets: zoomed-in images the dashed rectangles.[]{data-label="figure12"}](Fig13a.pdf
\right) =\left\langle \hat{a}_{A}^{\dag }\haT{a}%
_{A}\right\raNgle =\sUm_{k,L}k\lEfT\verT C_{kl}\Left( t\right) \righT\Vert
^{2},\Quad
\sigma \left( N_{A}\right) =\sqRt{%
\sum_{K,l}K^{2}\Left\VErT C_{kl}\lEft( t\rigHT) \rIGHt\vErT ^{2}-\lEft(
\SuM_{K,l}K\left\VerT C_{kl}\lefT( t\right) \rigHt\vErT ^{2}\right) ^{2}}.$$Fig.\[figURe11\] Calculates The Dynamics of thE meAn valuEs And THeir cOrrEsponDing flUCtuatiOns, and it sHoWS that tHE quantuM FLuCtuaTions (which are omitTEd IN a classical dynAmics) sTiLL pLAY an ImpOrtant roleS iN the sYNchroniZEd BEHAviORs in this case. FOr a coherent-STatE BEC, twO sCatTEring mOdes cAn QUicKly reach an eXact cS in a sensE of $x_{-}\riGHtarrow 0, P_{-}\RightarRow 0$ (see fig.\[FigUre11\] (a)(B)) BuT tHeiR fLUctUAtIonS PreSent “collApSe And reVivaL" BEHAvioRs aNd wiLl remAin for a long tiMe dUe to THe wEak diSsipaTionS oF the BeC scatTerinG mOdes. But for a trapPing TruncatioN of $%
N=1-g/\Chi\ApProx 10$, tHE two moDes HarDly reacH to a comPLetE Cs BUT mOre irregular fluctuAtIONs Are produCed thaN ThAt IN the numbEr-StaTe BEcS (See FiG.\[figURe7\](D)(e)(f))becauSe two sCAtTeRing modEs GeneraTeD in The NumbeR-StatE BECs wIll no lonGer trAP themselves in tHEir initial staTEs WIThIN theIr rEspective HiLberT SpacE of $\mAThCal{h}_n$ and tHe modE mIXiNG between different nuMbEr-statE BECs Will be involveD.

![The dynamiCAL Measure sYnchROnIZation of (a)(b) $S_{c}(t)$ aNd (c)(d) tHe mutual inFOrmation $i_{AB}(t)$ iN the wholE Hilbert sPACe of $\bigoPluS_{N}%
\mAthCal{h}_{n}$ FoR $N=0,1,2,\cdots,n$. The trUNCateD nUmber $n=15$ fOr (a) (C) and $n=10$ foR (b)(d). the OthEr pArAmeters arE the same As ThAt In fig.\[FigurE8\] And Fig.\[fiGuRe9\]. INsEts: The zoOMed-in iMages From ThE dASheD rectanGLeS.[]{DAta-lAbEl="FiguRe12"}](FIg13A.pdf
\right) =\left\langle \hat {a}_{A}^{\ dag } \ha t{a }% 
_{A }\ri ght\rangle =\s u m_{k ,l}k\left\vert C_{kl}\ left(  t \ righ t )\righ t\vert^ {2 } , \qu ad 
\ sig ma \l eft(N_{ A}\righ t) =\sqrt{ %
\ su m_{k,l}k^{2} \ le ft\vert C_ {kl }\left( t\ri ght ) \rig ht \ve r t ^{2 }-\ left( 
\sum_ { k,l}k\ left\vert  C _ {kl}\l e ft( t\r i g ht ) \r ight\vert ^{2}\ri g ht )  ^{2}}.$$Fig.\ [figur e1 1 \] c alc ula tes the dy na micso f the m e an v a lue s  and their co rresponding flu ctuati on s,a nd itshows  t h atthe quantum  flu ctuations  (whic h  are om i tted in  a cla ssi cal  dyn a mi cs ) s ti l l p l ay  an imp ortant r ol es  in t he s y n c h roni zed  beh avior s in this cas e.Fora  co heren t-sta te B EC , two  scatt ering  m odes can quickl y re ach an ex act  C S i na sen s e of $ x_{ -}\ rightar row 0,p _{- }\ r i g ht arrow 0$ (see Fig. \[ f i gu re11\] ( a)(b)) bu tt heir flu ct uat ions p resen t “c o ll apse and  reviv a l"  b ehavior sand wi ll  re mai n for a lo ng tim e due to  thew eak dissipatio n s of the BECs ca t t er i ng m ode s. But fora tr a ppin g tr u nc ati o n of$%
n= 1- g /\ c hi\approx 10$, thetw o mode s har dly reach toa complete C S  but mor e ir r eg u lar fluctuatio ns ar e produced than tha t inthe numb er-stateB E Cs (seeFig .\[ fig ure 7 \ ]( d)(e)(f))beca u s e tw oscatter ing  modesgen era ted  in  t he number -state B EC swi ll  no  long e r trap t he mse lv esin th e ir ini tialstat es  w i thi n their re s p ecti ve  H ilbe rtsp ace o f $\ m ath cal{H}_ N$ and th e m o de m ix in g betwe en differentnu mber-state  B ECs  willb e  involve d.

![The dynamical mea s ure syn chr oniza tion  of (a)(b ) $ S_{c}( t)$ and (c )(d) t he mu tu ali n forma t i on  $I _{ AB}(t)$ in t hewhole  H ilbe rt spac e of $\bigoplus_{N } %
\ mathcal{H}_{N }$for$ N =0 ,1, 2 ,\ c dot s, n $.T h e truncated num ber $n=15$  f o r(a) (c) an d  $n =1 0$ for(b)(d).  Theo ther pa rametersare the s am e as t hat  in Fig.\[ figure8\ ] and Fig . \[fig u re 9\].Ins ets: t he  zo omed- in ima g esfromthe da sh ed rec tangl es .[]{data -label="figure12"}](Fig 13a.pd f
\right) =\left\langle_\hat{a}_{A}^{\dag }\hat{a}%
_{A}\right\rangle_=\sum_{k,l}k\left\vert C_{kl}\left( t\right) \right\vert
^{2},\quad
\sigma_\left( N_{A}\right)_=\sqrt{%
\sum_{k,l}k^{2}\left\vert_C_{kl}\left( t\right)_\right\vert_^{2}-\left(
\sum_{k,l}k\left\vert C_{kl}\left( t\right)_\right\vert ^{2}\right) ^{2}}.$$Fig.\[figure11\]_calculates the dynamics of_the mean values_and_their corresponding fluctuations, and it shows that the quantum fluctuations (which are omitted in_a_classical dynamics)_still_play_an important roles in the_synchronized behaviors in this case._For a_coherent-state BEC, two scattering modes can quickly reach_an_exact CS in_a sense of $x_{-}\rightarrow 0, p_{-}\rightarrow 0$ (see Fig.\[figure11\]_(a)(b)) but their fluctuations present “collapse_and revival" behaviors_and_will_remain for a long_time due to the weak dissipations_of the BEC scattering modes. But_for a trapping truncation of $%
n=1-g/\chi\approx 10$,_the two modes hardly reach to_a complete CS but more_irregular fluctuations_are produced than that in_the number-state BECs_(see Fig.\[figure7\](d)(e)(f))because_two scattering modes_generated in the number-state BECs will_no longer trap_themselves in their initial states within_their_respective Hilbert space_of_$\mathcal{H}_N$_and the_mode mixing between_different_number-state BECs_will_be involved.

![The dynamical measure synchronization of_(a)(b)_$S_{c}(t)$ and (c)(d) the mutual information $I_{AB}(t)$_in the whole Hilbert_space_of $\bigoplus_{N}%
\mathcal{H}_{N}$ for $N=0,1,2,\cdots,n$._The truncated number $n=15$ for_(a) (c) and $n=10$ for (b)(d)._The other_parameters are_the same as that in Fig.\[figure8\] and Fig.\[figure9\]. Insets: the zoomed-in_images from the dashed rectangles.[]{data-label="figure12"}](Fig13a.pdf