 \end{gathered}$$ and projectors $\Pi^{\theta_\perp}_{k}$, $\Pi^{\tilde{\theta}}_{p}$, $\Pi^{\tilde{\theta}_\perp}_{p}$ are defined analogously to $\Pi^{\theta}_{k}$. It should be noted that observables (\[seq:observables\]) commute $$[S^{\theta}_{k},S^{\tilde{\theta}}_{p}] = 0,
 \label{eq:observables_commutator}$$ therefore the correlation function in the scalar state (\[eq:scalar\_state\_general\]) has the form $$\mathcal{C}^{\chi(k,p)}_{\textsf{polarization}}(k,\theta;p,\tilde{\theta}) = 
 \frac{{\langle\chi(k,p)|} S^{\tilde{\theta}}_{p} S^{\theta}_{k}
 {|\chi(k,p)\rangle}}{{\langle\chi(k,p)|\chi(k,p)\rangle}}.
 \label{eq:correl_function_polarization_general}$$ The numerator of the right side of Eq. (\[eq:correl\_function\_polarization\_general\]) can be written as \[see Eqs. (\[seq:observables\])\] $$\begin{aligned}
 {\langle\chi(k,p)|} S^{\tilde{\theta}}_{p} S^{\theta}_{k}
 {|\chi(k,p)\rangle} & = {\langle\chi(k,p)|}
 \Pi^{\tilde{\theta}}_{p} \Pi^{\theta}_{k} {|\chi(k,p)\rangle} \nonumber \\
  & + {\langle\chi(k,p)|} \Pi^{\tilde{\theta}_\perp}_{p} 
   \Pi^{\theta_\perp}_{k} {|\chi(k,p)\rangle} \nonumber \\
  & - {\langle\chi(k,p)|} \Pi^{\tilde{\theta}_\perp}_{p} 
   \Pi^{\theta}_{k} {|\chi(k,p)\rangle} \nonumber \\
  & - {\langle\chi(k,p)|} \Pi^{\tilde{\theta}}_{p} 
   \Pi^{\theta_\perp}_{k} {|\chi(k,p)\rangle}.
 \label{eq:numerator_correl_func}
 \end{aligned}$$ It is enough to calculate explicitly only ${\langle\chi(k,p)|}

\end{gathered}$$ and projectors $ \Pi^{\theta_\perp}_{k}$, $ \Pi^{\tilde{\theta}}_{p}$, $ \Pi^{\tilde{\theta}_\perp}_{p}$ are defined analogously to $ \Pi^{\theta}_{k}$. It should be noted that observables (\[seq: observables\ ]) commute $ $ [ S^{\theta}_{k},S^{\tilde{\theta}}_{p } ] = 0, 
  \label{eq: observables_commutator}$$ therefore the correlation coefficient affair in the scalar state (\[eq: scalar\_state\_general\ ]) has the human body $ $ \mathcal{C}^{\chi(k, p)}_{\textsf{polarization}}(k,\theta;p,\tilde{\theta }) = 
  \frac{{\langle\chi(k, p)| } S^{\tilde{\theta}}_{p } S^{\theta}_{k } 
  { |\chi(k, p)\rangle}}{{\langle\chi(k, p)|\chi(k, p)\rangle } }. 
  \label{eq: correl_function_polarization_general}$$ The numerator of the correct side of Eq.   (\[eq: correl\_function\_polarization\_general\ ]) can be written as \[see Eqs.   (\[seq: observables\])\ ] $ $ \begin{aligned } 
  { \langle\chi(k, p)| } S^{\tilde{\theta}}_{p } S^{\theta}_{k } 
  { |\chi(k, p)\rangle } & = { \langle\chi(k, p)| } 
  \Pi^{\tilde{\theta}}_{p } \Pi^{\theta}_{k } { |\chi(k, p)\rangle } \nonumber \\ 
   & + { \langle\chi(k, p)| } \Pi^{\tilde{\theta}_\perp}_{p } 
    \Pi^{\theta_\perp}_{k } { |\chi(k, p)\rangle } \nonumber \\ 
   & - { \langle\chi(k, p)| } \Pi^{\tilde{\theta}_\perp}_{p } 
    \Pi^{\theta}_{k } { |\chi(k, p)\rangle } \nonumber \\ 
   & - { \langle\chi(k, p)| } \Pi^{\tilde{\theta}}_{p } 
    \Pi^{\theta_\perp}_{k } { |\chi(k, p)\rangle }. 
  \label{eq: numerator_correl_func } 
  \end{aligned}$$ It is adequate to calculate explicitly only $ { \langle\chi(k, p)| }
 \enf{gathered}$$ and projectors $\Pi^{\theta_\perp}_{k}$, $\Pn^{\rilde{\tieta}}_{p}$, $\Pj^{\tilde{\thdta}_\perp}_{p}$ are defined analogonsly to $\Pu^{\theta}_{k}$. It should be nuted that observavles (\[weq:observaumes\]) commute $$[S^{\fmeta}_{k},V^{\vilde{\theta}}_{p}] = 0,
 \lsbel{eq:obsesvables_commutadof}$$ cherefore the correlation function ig the svapar state (\[eq:scwlar\_xeate\_fvntral\]) has the form $$\mathcal{C}^{\chi(k,p)}_{\testsf{polerization}}(k,\theta;l,\tilde{\theta}) = 
 \frac{{\langle\chl(k,p)|} D^{\tilde{\theta}}_{p} S^{\thetw}_{k}
 {|\chi(k,p)\rantle}}{{\lwbgle\chi(k,p)|\chi(y,p)\rangle}}.
 \label{eq:correl_runction_polarization_general}$$ The numexator of thg dihvt side of Xq. (\[eq:cogrel\_function\_polarizathon\_genetal\]) can be wribten es \[swe Eqs. (\[seq:observables\])\] $$\uegin{aligned}
 {\langle\cri(k,p)|} S^{\tilge{\cheta}}_{p} S^{\theta}_{k}
 {|\chi(k,p)\rqntle} & = {\lancle\cfu(k,p)|}
 \Pi^{\uilve{\tgeta}}_{p} \Oi^{\tieta}_{k} {|\chi(k,p)\dangle} \nonunber \\
  & + {\langle\chi(k,k)|} \Py^{\nolde{\theta}_\perl}_{p} 
   \[i^{\eheta_\perp}_{k} {|\chi(k,p)\rangle} \nonumber \\
  & - {\lancle\dhi(k,p)|} \Pi^{\tilde{\theta}_\perp}_{p} 
   \Pi^{\theta}_{k} {|\chi(k,p)\ranhle} \nonumfer \\
  & - {\langle\chi(k,p)|} \Pi^{\tilde{\theta}}_{p} 
   \Pi^{\theta_\perp}_{k} {|\chi(k,')\rxngoe}.
 \uqbfl{eq:numerator_correl_func}
 \end{aligned}$$ It is enoudg uo balculate explicibly only ${\langle\chi(l,p)|}

\end{gathered}$$ and projectors $\Pi^{\theta_\perp}_{k}$, $\Pi^{\tilde{\theta}}_{p}$, $\Pi^{\tilde{\theta}_\perp}_{p}$ are to It should noted that observables \label{eq:observables_commutator}$$ the correlation function the scalar state has the form $$\mathcal{C}^{\chi(k,p)}_{\textsf{polarization}}(k,\theta;p,\tilde{\theta}) = \frac{{\langle\chi(k,p)|} S^{\theta}_{k} {|\chi(k,p)\rangle}}{{\langle\chi(k,p)|\chi(k,p)\rangle}}. \label{eq:correl_function_polarization_general}$$ The numerator of the right side of Eq. (\[eq:correl\_function\_polarization\_general\]) can written as \[see Eqs. (\[seq:observables\])\] $$\begin{aligned} {\langle\chi(k,p)|} S^{\tilde{\theta}}_{p} S^{\theta}_{k} {|\chi(k,p)\rangle} & = {\langle\chi(k,p)|} \Pi^{\theta}_{k} \nonumber & {\langle\chi(k,p)|} \Pi^{\tilde{\theta}_\perp}_{p} \Pi^{\theta_\perp}_{k} {|\chi(k,p)\rangle} \nonumber \\ & - {\langle\chi(k,p)|} \Pi^{\tilde{\theta}_\perp}_{p} \Pi^{\theta}_{k} {|\chi(k,p)\rangle} \nonumber \\ & - \Pi^{\tilde{\theta}}_{p} \Pi^{\theta_\perp}_{k} {|\chi(k,p)\rangle}. \label{eq:numerator_correl_func} \end{aligned}$$ It is enough calculate explicitly only ${\langle\chi(k,p)|}
 \end{gathered}$$ and projectors $\PI^{\theta_\perp}_{K}$, $\Pi^{\tiLde{\TheTa}}_{P}$, $\Pi^{\tIlde{\Theta}_\perp}_{p}$ are dEFineD analogously to $\Pi^{\theta}_{k}$. it shoUlD Be noTEd That oBservabLEs (\[SEQ:obSeRvAblEs\]) COmMute $$[S^{\TheTa}_{k},S^{\tilDe{\theta}}_{p}] = 0,
 \laBel{Eq:Observables_cOMmUtator}$$ therEfoRe the correlaTioN functIoN in THe scaLar State (\[Eq:scalAR\_state\_General\]) haS tHE form $$\mAThcal{C}^{\cHI(K,p)}_{\TextSf{polarization}}(k,\thETa;P,\Tilde{\theta}) = 
 \frac{{\Langle\ChI(K,p)|} s^{\TIldE{\thEta}}_{p} S^{\theta}_{K}
 {|\cHi(k,p)\rANgle}}{{\lanGLe\CHI(K,p)|\cHI(k,p)\rangle}}.
 \labeL{eq:correl_fuNCtiOn_polaRiZatIOn_geneRal}$$ ThE nUMerAtor of the riGht sIde of Eq. (\[eq:Correl\_FUnction\_POlarizaTion\_geNerAl\]) cAn be WRiTtEn aS \[sEE EqS. (\[SeQ:obSErvAbles\])\] $$\begIn{AlIgned}
 {\LangLE\CHI(k,p)|} S^{\TilDe{\thEta}}_{p} S^{\Theta}_{k}
 {|\chi(k,p)\raNglE} & = {\lanGLe\cHi(k,p)|}
 \PI^{\tildE{\theTa}}_{P} \Pi^{\thEta}_{k} {|\chI(k,p)\raNgLe} \nonumber \\
  & + {\langlE\chi(K,p)|} \Pi^{\tilde{\TheTa}_\PerP}_{p} 
   \pi^{\theTA_\perp}_{k} {|\Chi(K,p)\rAngle} \noNumber \\
  & - {\lANglE\cHI(K,P)|} \PI^{\tilde{\theta}_\perp}_{p} 
   \Pi^{\ThETA}_{k} {|\Chi(k,p)\ranGle} \nonUMbEr \\
  & - {\LAngle\chi(K,p)|} \pi^{\tIlde{\THEta}}_{p} 
   \PI^{\theTA_\pErp}_{k} {|\chi(k,P)\ranglE}.
 \LaBeL{eq:numeRaTor_corReL_fuNc}
 \eNd{aliGNed}$$ IT is enoUgh to calCulatE Explicitly only ${\LAngle\chi(k,p)|}

 \end{gathered}$$ and proj ectors $\P i^{\t het a_\ pe rp}_ {k}$ , $\Pi^{\tilde { \the ta}}_{p}$, $\Pi^{\tild e{\th et a }_\p e rp }_{p} $ are d e fi n e d a na lo gou sl y  t o $\P i^{ \theta} _{k}$. Itsho ul d be noted t h at  observabl es(\[seq:obser vab les\])  c omm u te $$ [S^ {\the ta}_{k } ,S^{\t ilde{\the ta } }_{p}] = 0,
 \ l a be l{eq :observables_comm u ta t or}$$ therefor e theco r re l a tio n f unction in  t he sc a lar sta t e( \ [ eq: s calar\_state\ _general\]) has  the f or m $ $ \mathc al{C} ^{ \ chi (k,p)}_{\te xtsf {polariza tion}} ( k,\thet a ;p,\til de{\th eta })= 
\ fr ac {{\ la n gle \ ch i(k , p)| } S^{\ti ld e{ \thet a}}_ { p } S^{\ the ta}_ {k}
{|\chi(k,p)\r ang le}} { {\l angle \chi( k,p) |\ chi(k ,p)\ra ngle} }. 
 \label{eq:cor rel_ function_ pol ar iza ti on_ge n eral}$ $ T henumerat or of t h e r ig h t si de of Eq. (\[eq:co rr e l \_ function \_pola r iz at i on\_gene ra l\] ) ca n be wr itte n  a s \[seeEqs. ( \ [s eq :observ ab les\]) \]  $$ \be gin{a l igne d}
 {\ langle\c hi(k, p )|} S^{\tilde{ \ theta}}_{p} S ^ {\ t h et a }_{k }
{|\chi(k,p) \ran g le}& ={ \l ang l e\chi (k,p) |}  \ P i^{\tilde{\theta}}_ {p } \Pi^ {\the ta}_{k} {|\ch i(k,p)\ran g l e } \nonum ber\ \ & + {\langle\ chi(k ,p)|} \Pi^ { \tilde{\ theta }_\perp} _{p} 
  \ P i^{\thet a_\ per p}_ {k} { |\ chi(k,p)\rang l e } \n on umber \ \
 & - {\ lan gle \ch i(k ,p )|} \Pi^{ \tilde{\ th et a} _\ per p}_{p }  
   \Pi ^{ \th et a}_ {k} { | \chi(k ,p)\r angl e}  \ n onu mber \\  & - {\ la ng le\c hi( k, p)|}\Pi^ { \ti lde{\th eta}}_{p}  
 \Pi ^{ \t heta_\p erp}_{k} {|\c hi (k,p)\rang le }. \labe l { eq:numer ator_correl_func}
 \end { aligned }$$  It i s en ough to c alc ulateexp l icitly  only${\la ng le\ c h i(k,p ) | }
 \end{gathered}$$_and projectors_$\Pi^{\theta_\perp}_{k}$, $\Pi^{\tilde{\theta}}_{p}$, $\Pi^{\tilde{\theta}_\perp}_{p}$ are_defined analogously_to_$\Pi^{\theta}_{k}$. It_should_be noted that_observables (\[seq:observables\]) commute_$$[S^{\theta}_{k},S^{\tilde{\theta}}_{p}] = 0,
 \label{eq:observables_commutator}$$_therefore the correlation_function_in the scalar state (\[eq:scalar\_state\_general\]) has the form $$\mathcal{C}^{\chi(k,p)}_{\textsf{polarization}}(k,\theta;p,\tilde{\theta}) = 
 \frac{{\langle\chi(k,p)|} S^{\tilde{\theta}}_{p} S^{\theta}_{k}
_{|\chi(k,p)\rangle}}{{\langle\chi(k,p)|\chi(k,p)\rangle}}.
_\label{eq:correl_function_polarization_general}$$ The_numerator_of_the right side of Eq. (\[eq:correl\_function\_polarization\_general\])_can be written as \[see_Eqs. (\[seq:observables\])\] $$\begin{aligned}
_{\langle\chi(k,p)|} S^{\tilde{\theta}}_{p} S^{\theta}_{k}
 {|\chi(k,p)\rangle} & = {\langle\chi(k,p)|}
 \Pi^{\tilde{\theta}}_{p}_\Pi^{\theta}_{k}_{|\chi(k,p)\rangle} \nonumber \\
_ & + {\langle\chi(k,p)|} \Pi^{\tilde{\theta}_\perp}_{p} 
   \Pi^{\theta_\perp}_{k}_{|\chi(k,p)\rangle} \nonumber \\
  & -_{\langle\chi(k,p)|} \Pi^{\tilde{\theta}_\perp}_{p} 
___\Pi^{\theta}_{k} {|\chi(k,p)\rangle} \nonumber \\
_ & - {\langle\chi(k,p)|} \Pi^{\tilde{\theta}}_{p} 
_  \Pi^{\theta_\perp}_{k} {|\chi(k,p)\rangle}.
 \label{eq:numerator_correl_func}
 \end{aligned}$$_It is enough to calculate explicitly only_${\langle\chi(k,p)|}
