 spaced subsets of $S^1_{eucl}$ is somewhat unnatural; we leave open the following question, which would define the ‘upper and lower Rips magnitude’ of the circle intrinsically:

Does this asymptotic behaviour extend to arbitrary finite subsets of $S^1_{eucl}$? For instance, given any $\epsilon>0$, is there a $\delta>0$ such that for all finite $A\subseteq S^1_{eucl}$ with $d_H(A,S^1_{eucl})<\delta$ we have $$e^{-2t}+2\pi t-\epsilon<|tA|_\mathrm{Rips}<e^{-2t}+2\pi t\sum_{r\text{ odd}}\frac1r e^{-2t\cos\left(\frac\pi{2r}\right)}\sin\left(\frac\pi{2r}\right)+\epsilon$$ for all $t$ in a given interval?

Geodesic circle
---------------

Finally, we note that the case of the geodesic circle $S^1_{geo}$ of total arclength $2\pi$ can be treated using the same methods as we used for $S^1_{eucl}$. Namely, we restrict attention to equally spaced subsets $C_n^{geo}$ described in Section \[section-cycles\]. (Note that $C_n^{geo}$ is just the $n$-cycle graph $C_n$ rescaled by $\frac{2\pi}{n}$.)

We could calculate the limits along the same subsequences we examined in the case $S^1_{eucl}$ and find that they again exist, but instead we just state the final result regarding the lower and upper limit. In this case it turns out that the lower limit is still finite and can be expressed explicitly, whereas the upper limit becomes infinite. Thus the Rips magnitude of $S^1_{eucl}$ and $S^1_{geo}$ behave quite differently.

\[theorem-GC\] The Rips magnitudes of geodesic cycles $C^{\mathrm{geo}}_n$ satisfy $$\liminf_{n\to\infty}|t C^{\mathrm{geo}}_n|_{\mathrm{Rips}}=e^{-\pi t}+2\pi t$$ and $$\limsup_{n\to\infty}|t C^{\mathrm{geo}}_n|_{\mathrm{Rips}}=\infty.$$

The behaviour of $|t C^{\mathrm
spaced subsets of $ S^1_{eucl}$ is somewhat unnatural; we bequeath loose the following question, which would define the ‘ upper and lower Rips order of magnitude ’ of the circle intrinsically: 

 Does this asymptotic behaviour extend to arbitrary finite subset of $ S^1_{eucl}$? For example, given any $ \epsilon>0 $, is there a $ \delta>0 $ such that for all finite $ A\subseteq S^1_{eucl}$ with $ d_H(A, S^1_{eucl})<\delta$ we suffer $ $ e^{-2t}+2\pi t-\epsilon<|tA|_\mathrm{Rips}<e^{-2t}+2\pi t\sum_{r\text { odd}}\frac1r e^{-2t\cos\left(\frac\pi{2r}\right)}\sin\left(\frac\pi{2r}\right)+\epsilon$$ for all $ t$ in a given interval? 

 Geodesic r-2 
 --------------- 

 Finally, we note that the sheath of the geodesic traffic circle $ S^1_{geo}$ of total arclength $ 2\pi$ can be treated using the same methods as we use for $ S^1_{eucl}$. Namely, we restrict attention to equally space subsets $ C_n^{geo}$ described in Section \[section - cycles\ ]. (notice that $ C_n^{geo}$ is just the $ n$-cycle graph $ C_n$ rescale by $ \frac{2\pi}{n}$.) 

 We could calculate the limits along the same subsequences we examined in the case $ S^1_{eucl}$ and determine that they again exist, but instead we just state the final result involve the lower and upper limit. In this case it turns out that the lower limit is still finite and can be expressed explicitly, whereas the upper limit becomes countless. therefore the Rips magnitude of $ S^1_{eucl}$ and $ S^1_{geo}$ behave quite differently. 

 \[theorem - GC\ ] The Rips magnitude of geodesic cycles $ C^{\mathrm{geo}}_n$ satisfy $ $ \liminf_{n\to\infty}|t C^{\mathrm{geo}}_n|_{\mathrm{Rips}}=e^{-\pi t}+2\pi t$$ and $ $ \limsup_{n\to\infty}|t C^{\mathrm{geo}}_n|_{\mathrm{Rips}}=\infty.$$ 

 The behavior of $ |t C^{\mathrm
 spwced subsets of $S^1_{eucl}$ is somewhat unnatorql; we neave kpen the following question, which wonld eefint the ‘upper and lowdr Rips mwgnitude’ of uhe circle intrinsically:

Does thjd asvm'totic behaviout extend to drbitrary finide sbbsets of $S^1_{eucl}$? For instance, given agy $\epsikoj>0$, is there a $\dglta>0$ xtch fhat for all finite $A\subseteq S^1_{eucm}$ with $v_H(A,S^1_{eucl})<\delta$ wr have $$e^{-2t}+2\pi t-\epsilon<|tA|_\mathgm{Rios}<e^{-2t}+2\pi t\sum_{r\text{ ofd}}\frac1r e^{-2t\cis\lesr(\frac\pi{2r}\righg)}\sin\left(\frac\pi{2r}\right)+\epailon$$ for all $t$ in a given intefval?

Gzodesic cirxlw
---------------

Fijdlly, we notx that the case of the geogesic corcle $S^1_{geo}$ of botal arxlength $2\pi$ can be treeted using the same iethods av ce used for $S^1_{eucl}$. Namwlt, we testrhct xrtevtikn tk equaply spaced sugsets $C_n^{geo}$ described in Sectipn \[wection-cycles\]. (Note ehwt $C_n^{geo}$ is just the $n$-cycle graph $C_n$ revcamed by $\frac{2\pi}{n}$.)

We could xalculate the limits wlong the same subsequences we examined in the case $S^1_{eucl}$ dnd fmna tkqt thdt wgain exist, but instead we just state the finwm texult regarding the lower snf ikper limit. In jhis case jt turns out that hhe lowgr limut is stijl fonite and can be expressed wxplicitly, wkerwas the upper limic becomes inyinite. Thus the Rips magnitude of $R^1_{eucm}$ and $S^1_{geo}$ hehave qujge differently.

\[thdorvm-GC\] The Rips magnitudes of gejdesic cyrles $E^{\mathrm{gdo}}_n$ xatisfr $$\liminf_{n\tl\inftn}|d C^{\mathrm{geo}}_n|_{\mathrl{Rips}}=g^{-\pi t}+2\ph t$$ and $$\lilsup_{n\to\infty}|t C^{\mathrm{geo}}_n|_{\mathrm{Cmps}}=\infty.$$

The bghaeiolr of $|t C^{\iathrk
spaced subsets of $S^1_{eucl}$ is somewhat unnatural; open following question, would define the of circle intrinsically: Does asymptotic behaviour extend arbitrary finite subsets of $S^1_{eucl}$? For given any $\epsilon>0$, is there a $\delta>0$ such that for all finite $A\subseteq with $d_H(A,S^1_{eucl})<\delta$ we have $$e^{-2t}+2\pi t-\epsilon<|tA|_\mathrm{Rips}<e^{-2t}+2\pi t\sum_{r\text{ odd}}\frac1r e^{-2t\cos\left(\frac\pi{2r}\right)}\sin\left(\frac\pi{2r}\right)+\epsilon$$ for all $t$ in given Geodesic --------------- we note that the case of the geodesic circle $S^1_{geo}$ of total arclength $2\pi$ can be using the same methods as we used for Namely, we restrict attention equally spaced subsets $C_n^{geo}$ described Section (Note that is the graph $C_n$ rescaled $\frac{2\pi}{n}$.) We could calculate the limits along the same subsequences we examined in the case $S^1_{eucl}$ and that they but instead just the result regarding the upper limit. In this case it the lower limit is still finite and can expressed explicitly, the upper limit becomes infinite. Thus Rips magnitude of $S^1_{eucl}$ and $S^1_{geo}$ behave quite \[theorem-GC\] The Rips magnitudes of geodesic cycles $C^{\mathrm{geo}}_n$ satisfy $$\liminf_{n\to\infty}|t C^{\mathrm{geo}}_n|_{\mathrm{Rips}}=e^{-\pi t}+2\pi t$$ and $$\limsup_{n\to\infty}|t behaviour of $|t C^{\mathrm
 spaced subsets of $S^1_{eucl}$ is somEwhat unnatUral; wE leAve OpEn thE folLowing question, WHich Would define the ‘upper and Lower riPS magNItUde’ of The circLE iNTRinSiCaLly:

doES tHis asYmpTotic beHaviour extEnd To Arbitrary finITe Subsets of $S^1_{EucL}$? For instance, GivEn any $\ePsIloN>0$, Is theRe a $\Delta>0$ Such thAT for alL finite $A\sUbSEteq S^1_{eUCl}$ with $d_h(a,s^1_{eUcl})<\dElta$ we have $$e^{-2t}+2\pi t-\epSIlON<|tA|_\mathrm{Rips}<e^{-2T}+2\pi t\suM_{r\TExT{ ODd}}\fRac1R e^{-2t\cos\left(\FrAc\pi{2r}\RIght)}\sin\LEfT(\FRAc\pI{2R}\right)+\epsilon$$ For all $t$ in a gIVen IntervAl?

geoDEsic ciRcle
---------------

FInALly, We note that tHe caSe of the geOdesic CIrcle $S^1_{gEO}$ of totaL arcleNgtH $2\pi$ Can bE TrEaTed UsINg tHE sAme MEthOds as we uSeD fOr $S^1_{euCl}$. NaMELY, We reStrIct aTtentIon to equally sPacEd suBSetS $C_n^{geO}$ descRibeD iN SectIon \[secTion-cYcLes\]. (Note that $C_n^{geO}$ is jUst the $n$-cyCle GrAph $c_n$ RescaLEd by $\frAc{2\pI}{n}$.)

WE could cAlculatE The LiMITS aLong the same subsequEnCES wE examineD in the CAsE $S^1_{EUcl}$ and fiNd ThaT theY AGain eXist, BUt Instead wE just sTAtE tHe final ReSult reGaRdiNg tHe lowER and Upper lImit. In thIs casE It turns out that THe lower limit iS StILL fINite And Can be expresSed eXPlicItly, WHeReaS The upPer liMiT BeCOmes infinite. Thus the riPs magnItude Of $S^1_{eucl}$ and $S^1_{geO}$ behave quiTE DIfferentLy.

\[thEOrEM-GC\] The Rips magnItudeS of geodesiC Cycles $C^{\mAthrm{Geo}}_n$ satiSfy $$\liminf_{N\TO\infty}|t C^{\MatHrm{Geo}}_N|_{\maTHRm{rips}}=e^{-\pi t}+2\pi t$$ anD $$\LImsuP_{n\To\infty}|T C^{\mAthrm{geO}}_n|_{\mAthRm{RIps}}=\InFty.$$

The behAviour of $|T C^{\MaThRm
 spaced subsets of $S^1_{e ucl}$ is s omewh atunn at ural ; we  leave open th e  fol lowing question, which  woul dd efin e  t he ‘u pper an d  l o w erRi ps  ma gn i tu de’ o f t he circ le intrins ica ll y:

Does thi s  a symptoticbeh aviour exten d t o arbi tr ary finit e s ubset s of $ S ^1_{eu cl}$? For  i n stance ,  givena n y$\ep silon>0$, is ther e  a $\delta>0$ suc h that  f o ra l l f ini te $A\subs et eq S^ 1 _{eucl} $  w i t h  $d _ H(A,S^1_{eucl })<\delta$w e h ave $$ e^ {-2 t }+2\pi  t-\e ps i lon <|tA|_\math rm{R ips}<e^{- 2t}+2\ p i t\sum _ {r\text { odd} }\f rac 1r e ^ {- 2t \co s\ l eft ( \f rac \ pi{ 2r}\righ t) }\ sin\l eft( \ f r a c\pi {2r }\ri ght)+ \epsilon$$ fo r a ll $ t $ i n a g iveninte rv al?
Geodes ic ci rc le
------------ ---
Finally,  we  n ote  t hat t h e case  of  th e geode sic cir c le$S ^ 1 _ {g eo}$ of total arcl en g t h$2\pi$ c an bet re at e d usingth e s amem e thods  asw eused for  $S^1_ { eu cl }$. Nam el y, were str ict  atte n tion  to eq ually sp aceds ubsets $C_n^{g e o}$ described in S ec t ion\[s ection-cycl es\] .  (No te t h at  $C _ n^{ge o}$ i sj us t  the $n$-cycle grap h$C_n$resca led by $\frac {2\pi}{n}$ . ) 
We coul d ca l cu l ate the limits  alon g the same subseque nceswe exami ned in th e case $S^ 1_{ euc l}$  an d fi nd that theya g ainex ist, bu t i nsteadwejus t s tat ethe final  resultre ga rd in g t he lo w er and u pp erli mit . Int his ca se it  tur ns  o u t t hat the lo w e r li mi tis s til lfinit e an d  ca n be ex pressed e xpl i citl y,  w hereasthe upper lim it  becomes i nf ini te. Th u s  the Rip s magnitude of $S^1_{eu c l}$ and  $S ^1_{g eo}$  behave q uit e diff ere n tly.
\[theo rem-G C\ ] T h e  Rips m ag nit ud es of geod e s iccycle s$C^{ \mathrm {geo}}_n$ satisfy$ $\l iminf_{n\to\i nft y}|t C ^{ \ma t hr m {ge o} } _n| _ { \mathrm{Rips}}= e^{-\pi t} +2 \ pi  t$$ and $ $ \li ms up_{n\t o\infty }|t C ^ {\mathr m{geo}}_n |_{\mathr m{ Rips } } =\i nfty.$$

T he behav iour of $ | t C^{ \ ma thrm
 spaced_subsets of_$S^1_{eucl}$ is somewhat unnatural;_we leave_open_the following_question,_which would define_the ‘upper and_lower Rips magnitude’ of_the circle intrinsically:

Does_this_asymptotic behaviour extend to arbitrary finite subsets of $S^1_{eucl}$? For instance, given any $\epsilon>0$,_is_there a_$\delta>0$_such_that for all finite $A\subseteq_S^1_{eucl}$ with $d_H(A,S^1_{eucl})<\delta$ we have_$$e^{-2t}+2\pi t-\epsilon<|tA|_\mathrm{Rips}<e^{-2t}+2\pi_t\sum_{r\text{ odd}}\frac1r e^{-2t\cos\left(\frac\pi{2r}\right)}\sin\left(\frac\pi{2r}\right)+\epsilon$$ for all $t$ in a_given_interval?

Geodesic circle
---------------

Finally, we_note that the case of the geodesic circle $S^1_{geo}$_of total arclength $2\pi$ can be_treated using the_same_methods_as we used for_$S^1_{eucl}$. Namely, we restrict attention to_equally spaced subsets $C_n^{geo}$ described in_Section \[section-cycles\]. (Note that $C_n^{geo}$ is just_the $n$-cycle graph $C_n$ rescaled by_$\frac{2\pi}{n}$.)

We could calculate the limits_along the_same subsequences we examined in_the case $S^1_{eucl}$_and find_that they again_exist, but instead we just state_the final result_regarding the lower and upper limit._In_this case it_turns_out_that the_lower limit is_still_finite and_can_be expressed explicitly, whereas the upper_limit_becomes infinite. Thus the Rips magnitude of_$S^1_{eucl}$ and $S^1_{geo}$ behave_quite_differently.

\[theorem-GC\] The Rips magnitudes_of geodesic cycles $C^{\mathrm{geo}}_n$ satisfy_$$\liminf_{n\to\infty}|t C^{\mathrm{geo}}_n|_{\mathrm{Rips}}=e^{-\pi t}+2\pi t$$ and $$\limsup_{n\to\infty}|t_C^{\mathrm{geo}}_n|_{\mathrm{Rips}}=\infty.$$

The behaviour_of $|t_C^{\mathrm