 exceeds a density contrast of about $10^4$ a “sink” particle is created (Bate et al. 1995). It replaces the central high-density region and has the ability to accrete further infalling material while keeping track of mass and linear and angular momentum. However, the internal structure of the sink particle is not resolved. With a diameter of about 600 AU it fully encloses the star/disk system expected to form roughly 1000 years after the critical density for sink particle formation is reached (Wuchterl & Klessen 2000).

The numerical resolution limit of our numerical scheme is determined by the Bate & Burkert (1996) criterion, which is sufficient for the highly nonlinear fluctuation spectrum considered here. This is confirmed by resolutions studies with up to $10^7$ SPH particles (see Jappsen et al. 2004). It should be noted, however, that the Bate & Burkert (1996) criterion may not be sufficient for adequately following the growth of linear perturbations out of quasi-equilibrium, as was suggested for the case of rotationally supported disks by Fisher, Klein, & McKee (private communication).

We analyze two models, one labeled, in which turbulence is driven on large scales, of wavelength $\lambda \approx 1/2$ of the computational box, and the other labeled, in which energy is injected on smaller scales, of $\lambda\approx 1/8$ of the box. We consider the system at an evolutionary stage when 5% of the available gas mass is accumulated in collapsed cores. Note that in Paper I we also studied cores from a contracting Gaussian density field (GC) without turbulence. Since in this paper we focus on the turbulent velocity structure, that simulation is not considered here.

To identify cloud cores we use the 3-dimensional clump-finding algorithm introduced in Appendix A of Klessen & Burkert (2000). We then project a cubic subregion of the full computational volume centered around the core along the three principal axes, and compute the column density $N$ and the total, turbulent-plus-thermal l.o.s velocity dispersion $\sigma_{\rm los}$ of each core. We take $\sigma_{\rm los}^2 = \sigma_{\rm turb}^2 + c_{\rm s}^2$, where the turbulent velocity dispersion $\sigma_{\rm turb}$ is obtained as the mass-weighted standard deviation of the velocity field in each line-of-sight along the projection axis, and
exceeds a density contrast of about $ 10 ^ 4 $ a “ sinkhole ” atom is created (Bate et al.   1995). It replaces the cardinal high - concentration region and has the ability to accrete far infalling fabric while keeping track of mass and linear and angular momentum. However, the internal social organization of the sink particle is not resolved. With a diameter of about 600 AU it amply encloses the star / disk system expected to shape roughly 1000 years after the critical density for cesspool particle formation is reached (Wuchterl & Klessen 2000). 

 The numerical resolving power limit of our numerical scheme is determined by the Bate & Burkert (1996) criterion, which is sufficient for the highly nonlinear variation spectrum considered here. This is confirmed by resolutions studies with up to $ 10 ^ 7 $ SPH particles (see Jappsen et al.   2004). It should be note, however, that the Bate & Burkert (1996) criterion may not be sufficient for adequately following the growth of linear perturbations out of quasi - equilibrium, as was suggested for the case of rotationally supported disks by Fisher, Klein, & McKee (individual communication). 

 We analyze two models, one labeled, in which turbulence is drive on big scales, of wavelength $ \lambda \approx 1/2 $ of the computational box, and the early labeled, in which department of energy is injected on smaller scales, of $ \lambda\approx 1/8 $ of the corner. We consider the system at an evolutionary stage when 5% of the available gas mass is accumulated in crack up cores. Note that in Paper   I we also studied core from a compress Gaussian concentration field (GC) without turbulence. Since in this paper we focus on the turbulent velocity structure, that simulation is not considered here. 

 To name cloud core we use the 3 - dimensional clump - receive algorithm introduced in Appendix A of Klessen & Burkert (2000). We then plan a cubic subregion of the full computational volume focus on around the core along the three chief axes, and compute the column density $ N$ and the total, churning - plus - thermal l.o.s velocity dispersion $ \sigma_{\rm los}$ of each core. We take $ \sigma_{\rm los}^2 = \sigma_{\rm turb}^2 + c_{\rm s}^2 $, where the turbulent speed dispersion $ \sigma_{\rm turb}$ is obtained as the mass - slant standard deviation of the velocity field in each line - of - sight along the project axis, and
 exfeeds a density contrast of about $10^4$ a “siuj” partmcle is created (Bate et al. 1995). It replaces the renteal hugh-density region and fas the ahility ti acrrete further inhzlling materizp whnlx keeping track of mass atd linear and dneupar momentum. However, the internal seructurr lf the sink patticlt if nof resolved. With a diameter of abouf 600 AU iu fully encloses tne star/disk system expectef to form roughly 1000 yeags after thg cryrical densith for sink particle fotmation is reached (Wuchterl & Klersen 2000).

Che numericql redmlution limmt of jur numerical scheme is detrrmined by the Bave & Vurkert (1996) criterion, whmch is sufficient fot the highny nonlinear fluctuqtuon skectrgm cubsiaertd iers. This is confirmed by resolutuons studies with uk tj $10^7$ SPH particlss (see Jwppsen et al. 2004). It should be noted, however, thzt the Bate & Burkert (1996) ceiterion may not be sofficient sor adequately following the growth of linear perdurbaviuns omt ow qkasi-equilibrium, as was suggested for the case kf rptationally suiported disks by Fosjet, Klein, & McKee (privacs dommunication).

We anwlyze tro moeels, one jabeked, in which turbulence is eriven on lagge wcales, of wavelengch $\lambda \ap'rox 1/2$ pf thr computational box, and the other labeped, in whjzh energy is injdctvd ot smaller scales, of $\lambda\wpprox 1/8$ oh the box. We conxider ehe system at ak evolutionary stagf wheu 5% of the availwble gas mass is accumulated in collapsed corgs. Totv that in Papev I we also studyed cores from a contxactine Gaussian densitb field (GC) wythout turbulajce. Since in this pa[er qe ficus on ghe turbulent felocity structure, rhat simulation is noj donsidered here.

Cu identify cloud cofes wv uxe dhe 3-dimensiotal zluol-findkng algoritmm kntrpduced in Appendix A of Ilessen & Burkert (2000). Ee then priject a subic subregipn of the full comkutatimnau volime centered around the core alonf the thrfe irincipal axef, ane compute thz column density $N$ and the total, turbuleit-plus-thermal l.o.s velocuty dispersion $\sigmc_{\rk los}$ of earh corq. We take $\sigma_{\rm los}^2 = \sigma_{\rn turb}^2 + c_{\rm s}^2$, wheve the turbulent velocjty divperslon $\sigma_{\rm turb}$ is obtained as the mass-weighted standard deviation of thw veloriey field in eacn linv-of-fnght aljng vhx projection axis, and
exceeds a density contrast of about $10^4$ particle created (Bate al. 1995). It and the ability to further infalling material keeping track of mass and linear angular momentum. However, the internal structure of the sink particle is not resolved. a diameter of about 600 AU it fully encloses the star/disk system expected form 1000 after critical density for sink particle formation is reached (Wuchterl & Klessen 2000). The numerical resolution limit our numerical scheme is determined by the Bate Burkert (1996) criterion, which sufficient for the highly nonlinear spectrum here. This confirmed resolutions with up to SPH particles (see Jappsen et al. 2004). It should be noted, however, that the Bate & Burkert criterion may sufficient for following growth linear perturbations out as was suggested for the case disks by Fisher, Klein, & McKee (private communication). analyze two one labeled, in which turbulence is on large scales, of wavelength $\lambda \approx 1/2$ the computational box, and the other labeled, in which energy is injected on smaller scales, 1/8$ of the box. consider the system an stage 5% the available mass is accumulated in collapsed cores. Note that in Paper I also studied cores from a contracting Gaussian density field (GC) Since this paper we on the turbulent velocity that is not considered here. cloud we clump-finding introduced Appendix A of Klessen Burkert (2000). We then project cubic subregion of the the core along the three principal axes, and the column density $N$ and the total, l.o.s velocity dispersion $\sigma_{\rm los}$ of each core. We take $\sigma_{\rm los}^2 \sigma_{\rm turb}^2 s}^2$, where the turbulent velocity dispersion $\sigma_{\rm turb}$ obtained as the mass-weighted deviation of the velocity field in each line-of-sight along projection and
 exceeds a density contrast of About $10^4$ a “sink” PartiCle Is cReAted (bate Et al. 1995). It replaces THe ceNtral high-density region And haS tHE abiLItY to acCrete fuRThER InfAlLiNg mAtERiAl whiLe kEeping tRack of mass And LiNear and angulAR mOmentum. HowEveR, the internal StrUcture Of The SInk paRtiCle is Not resOLved. WiTh a diametEr OF about 600 au it fullY ENcLoseS the star/disk systeM ExPEcted to form rouGhly 1000 yeArS AfTER thE crItical densItY for sINk partiCLe FORMatIOn is reached (WuChterl & KlessEN 2000).

ThE numerIcAl rESolutiOn limIt OF ouR numerical sChemE is determIned by THe Bate & BURkert (1996) crIterioN, whIch Is suFFiCiEnt FoR The HIgHly NOnlInear fluCtUaTion sPectRUM COnsiDerEd heRe. ThiS is confirmed bY reSoluTIonS studIes wiTh up To $10^7$ sPH paRticleS (see JApPsen et al. 2004). It shoulD be nOted, howevEr, tHaT thE BAte & BuRKert (1996) crIteRioN may not Be suffiCIenT fOR ADeQuately following thE gROWtH of lineaR pertuRBaTiONs out of qUaSi-eQuilIBRium, aS was SUgGested foR the caSE oF rOtationAlLy suppOrTed DisKs by FISher, klein, & MCKee (privAte coMMunication).

We anALyze two models, ONe LABeLEd, in WhiCh turbulencE is dRIven On laRGe ScaLEs, of wAveleNgTH $\lAMbda \approx 1/2$ of the compUtAtionaL box, aNd the other labEled, in whicH ENErgy is inJectED oN Smaller scales, oF $\lambDa\approx 1/8$ of THe box. We cOnsidEr the sysTem at an evOLUtionary StaGe wHen 5% Of tHE AvAilable gas masS IS accUmUlated iN coLlapsed CorEs. NOte ThaT iN Paper I we Also studIeD cOrEs FroM a conTRacting GAuSsiAn DenSity fIEld (GC) wIthouT turBuLeNCe. SInce in tHIs PAPer wE fOcUs on The TuRbuleNt veLOciTy strucTure, that sImuLAtioN iS nOt consiDered here.

To idEnTify cloud cOrEs wE use thE 3-DImensionAl clump-finding algorithm INtroducEd iN AppeNdix a of KlesseN & BuRkert (2000). WE thEN projeCt a cubIc subReGioN OF the fULL cOmpUtAtional volUME ceNtereD aRounD the corE along the three prinCIpaL axes, and compuTe tHe coLUMn DenSItY $n$ anD tHE toTAL, turbulent-plus-tHermal l.o.s vElOCiTy dispersiON $\siGmA_{\rm los}$ oF each coRe. We tAKe $\sigma_{\Rm los}^2 = \sigmA_{\rm turb}^2 + c_{\rM s}^2$, WherE THe tUrbulent veLocity diSpersion $\sIGma_{\rm TUrB}$ is obTaiNed as tHe MasS-weigHted stANdaRd devIation Of The velOcity FiEld in eacH line-of-sight along the proJectioN axis, And
 exceeds a density contras t of about  $10^ 4$a “ si nk”part icle is create d  (Ba te et al. 1995). It re place st he c e nt ral h igh-den s it y reg io nand  h a sthe a bil ity toaccrete fu rth er  infalling m a te rial while  ke eping trackofmass a nd  li n ear a ndangul ar mom e ntum.However,th e  inter n al stru c t ur e of  the sink particl e  i s  not resolved.  Withad ia m e ter  of  about 600  A U itf ully en c lo s e s  th e  star/disk sy stem expect e d t o form  r oug h ly 100 0 yea rs aft er the crit ical  densityfor si n k parti c le form ationisrea ched (W uc hte rl & K l es sen 200 0).

The  n um erica l re s o l u tion  li mitof ou r numerical s che me i s  de termi ned b y th eBate& Burk ert ( 19 96) criterion,whic h is suff ici en t f or  theh ighlynon lin ear flu ctuatio n  sp ec t r u mconsidered here. T hi s is  confirm ed byr es ol u tions st ud ies  wit h up to  $10 ^ 7$  SPH par ticles (s ee  Jappse net al.  2 004 ).It sh o uldbe not ed, howe ver,t hat the Bate & Burkert (1996 )  c r i te r ionmay  not be suf fici e nt f or a d eq uat e ly fo llowi ng th e  growth of linear p er turbat ionsout of quasi- equilibriu m , as was s ugge s te d  for the caseof ro tationally supporte d dis ks by Fi sher, Kle i n , & McKe e ( pri vat e c o m mu nication).

W e anal yz e two m ode ls, one  la bel ed,  in  w hich turb ulence i sdr iv en  on  larg e  scales,  o f w av ele ngth$ \lambd a \ap prox  1 /2 $  of  the co m pu t a tion al  b ox,and  t he ot herl abe led, in  which en erg y  isin je cted on  smaller scal es , of $\lam bd a\a pprox1 / 8$ of th e box. We consider thes ystem a t a n evo luti onary sta gewhen 5 % o f  the a vailab le ga smas s is ac c u mu lat ed  in collap s e d c ores.  N otethat in  Paper I we also s t udi ed cores from  acont r a ct ing Ga u ssi an den s i ty field (GC) w ithout tur bu l en ce. Sincei n t hi s paper  we foc us on the tur bulent ve locity st ru ctur e ,  th at simulat ion is n ot consid e red h e re .

To  id entify  c lou d cor es weu sethe 3 -dimen si onal c lump- fi nding al gorithm introduced in A ppendi x A o f K lessen &Bur k ert  (2000).We t hen projec t a  cu bic s ubr e gionof t h eful l  comp utat i onal volu m ecen t e re d around th e c ore  alon g t h e thre e pr incipal axes, and compute the co lumn d ens ity $N$an d the total, t urb ul e n t-plus-t he rmal l.o.svelocity  d i spers ion $\ sigma_ {\rm lo s } $o f each  cor e.We take $ \si gm a _{\rm l os }^ 2  = \si gma_ {\ rm tur b}^2 + c_{\ r m  s}^2$, where th e tur b u lentv elo citydi spersio n  $\s igma_{\rmturb}$ is o btaine d as  themass-we ig hted s tan da rd deviati o n of theveloc ity fie ld  ineac h line -of- s i ght a long  t heprojectio n ax i s,  a n d
 exceeds_a density_contrast of about $10^4$_a “sink”_particle_is created_(Bate_et al. 1995). It_replaces the central_high-density region and has_the ability to_accrete_further infalling material while keeping track of mass and linear and angular momentum. However,_the_internal structure_of_the_sink particle is not resolved._With a diameter of about_600 AU_it fully encloses the star/disk system expected to_form_roughly 1000 years_after the critical density for sink particle formation is_reached (Wuchterl & Klessen 2000).

The numerical_resolution limit of_our_numerical_scheme is determined by_the Bate & Burkert (1996) criterion,_which is sufficient for the highly_nonlinear fluctuation spectrum considered here. This is_confirmed by resolutions studies with up_to $10^7$ SPH particles (see_Jappsen et_al. 2004). It should be noted,_however, that the_Bate &_Burkert (1996) criterion_may not be sufficient for adequately_following the growth_of linear perturbations out of quasi-equilibrium,_as_was suggested for_the_case_of rotationally_supported disks by_Fisher,_Klein, &_McKee_(private communication).

We analyze two models, one_labeled,_in which turbulence is driven on large_scales, of wavelength $\lambda_\approx_1/2$ of the computational_box, and the other labeled,_in which energy is injected on_smaller scales,_of $\lambda\approx_1/8$ of the box. We consider the system at an evolutionary_stage when 5% of the available_gas mass is accumulated_in collapsed_cores._Note that in_Paper I_we also_studied cores from a contracting Gaussian density_field (GC)_without turbulence. Since in this paper_we focus on the_turbulent_velocity structure, that simulation is not_considered here.

To identify cloud cores we_use the 3-dimensional clump-finding algorithm_introduced_in_Appendix A of Klessen &_Burkert (2000). We then project a_cubic subregion of_the full computational volume centered around the_core_along the three principal axes, and_compute_the column density $N$ and the_total,_turbulent-plus-thermal_l.o.s velocity dispersion $\sigma_{\rm los}$_of each core. We take $\sigma_{\rm_los}^2 = \sigma_{\rm turb}^2 + c_{\rm s}^2$, where the_turbulent velocity dispersion_$\sigma_{\rm turb}$ is obtained as_the_mass-weighted_standard deviation of the velocity field in each line-of-sight along_the projection_axis, and