 ${\mbox{Att}\,}_R({\mbox{H}\, }^n_{\mathfrak{a}}(M))= {\mbox{Att}\,}_R({\mbox{H}\, }^n_{\mathfrak{b}}(M))$ with ${\mathfrak{b}}= {\bigcap\limits_{i=1}^rQ_i}$. Now, by [@DY2 Theorem 1.6], we have ${\mbox{H}\, }^n_{\mathfrak{a}}(M)\cong {\mbox{H}\, }^n_{\mathfrak{b}}(M)$. As ${\mbox{dim}\,}(R/{\mathfrak{b}})= 1$, the proof is complete.

If ${\mbox{dim}\,}_R(M)=1$ then any subset $T$ of ${\mbox{Assh}\,}_R(M)$ is equal to the set ${\mbox{Att}\,}_R({\mbox{H}\, }^1_{\mathfrak{a}}(M))$ for some ideal ${\mathfrak{a}}$ of $R$.

With notations as in Proposition 2.1, we take $Q_i={\mathfrak{q}}_i$ for $i=1,\cdots, r$.

By a straightforward argument one may notice that the condition “complete" is superficial, for if $T$ is a non–empty proper subset of ${\mbox{Assh}\,}_R(M)$, then $T={\mbox{Att}\,}_R({\mbox{H}\, }^1_{\mathfrak{a}}(M))$, where ${\mathfrak{a}}=\underset{{\mathfrak{p}}\in{\mbox{Assh}\,}_R(M)\setminus T}{\cap}{\mathfrak{p}}$.

The following is an example to Proposition 2.1.

Set $R=k[[X,Y,Z,W]]$, where $k$ is a field and $X,Y,Z,W$ are independent indeterminates. Then $R$ is a complete Noetherian local ring with maximal ideal ${\mathfrak{m}}=(X,Y,Z,W)$. Consider prime ideals $${\mathfrak{p}}_1=(X,Y) \quad ,  \quad {\mathfrak{p}}_2=(Z,W)\quad, \quad  {\mathfrak{p}}_3=(Y,Z)
\quad, \quad  {\mathfrak{p}}_4=(X,W)$$ and set $\displaystyle
M=\frac{R}{{\mathfrak{p}}_1{\mathfrak{p}}_2{\mathfrak{p}}_3{\
$ { \mbox{Att}\,}_R({\mbox{H}\, } ^n_{\mathfrak{a}}(M))= { \mbox{Att}\,}_R({\mbox{H}\, } ^n_{\mathfrak{b}}(M))$ with $ { \mathfrak{b}}= { \bigcap\limits_{i=1}^rQ_i}$. Now, by [ @DY2 Theorem 1.6 ], we have $ { \mbox{H}\, } ^n_{\mathfrak{a}}(M)\cong { \mbox{H}\, } ^n_{\mathfrak{b}}(M)$. As $ { \mbox{dim}\,}(R/{\mathfrak{b}})= 1 $, the proof is complete. 

 If $ { \mbox{dim}\,}_R(M)=1 $ then any subset $ T$ of $ { \mbox{Assh}\,}_R(M)$ is adequate to the located $ { \mbox{Att}\,}_R({\mbox{H}\, } ^1_{\mathfrak{a}}(M))$ for some ideal $ { \mathfrak{a}}$ of $ R$. 

 With notations as in Proposition 2.1, we take $ Q_i={\mathfrak{q}}_i$ for $ i=1,\cdots, r$. 

 By a square argumentation one may notice that the condition “ arrant " is superficial, for if $ T$ is a non – empty proper subset of $ { \mbox{Assh}\,}_R(M)$, then $ T={\mbox{Att}\,}_R({\mbox{H}\, } ^1_{\mathfrak{a}}(M))$, where $ { \mathfrak{a}}=\underset{{\mathfrak{p}}\in{\mbox{Assh}\,}_R(M)\setminus T}{\cap}{\mathfrak{p}}$. 

 The pursuit is an example to Proposition 2.1. 

 Set $ R = k[[X, Y, Z, W]]$, where $ k$ is a field and $ adam, Y, Z, W$ are independent indeterminates. Then $ R$ is a complete Noetherian local closed chain with maximal ideal $ { \mathfrak{m}}=(X, Y, Z, W)$. regard prime ideal $ $ { \mathfrak{p}}_1=(X, Y) \quad,   \quad { \mathfrak{p}}_2=(Z, W)\quad, \quad   { \mathfrak{p}}_3=(Y, Z) 
 \quad, \quad   { \mathfrak{p}}_4=(X, W)$$ and set $ \displaystyle 
 M=\frac{R}{{\mathfrak{p}}_1{\mathfrak{p}}_2{\mathfrak{p}}_3{\
 ${\mblx{Att}\,}_R({\mbox{H}\, }^n_{\mathfrak{a}}(M))= {\obox{Att}\,}_R({\mbox{H}\, }^n_{\mathfran{b}}(M))$ wifh ${\mathffak{b}}= {\bigcap\limits_{i=1}^rQ_i}$. Now, by [@DT2 Theirem 1.6], we have ${\mbox{H}\, }^n_{\mxthfrak{a}}(M)\bong {\mbox{Y}\, }^n_{\methfrak{b}}(M)$. As ${\mboe{sim}\,}(R/{\matmyrak{b}})= 1$, the 'roof is compleje.

If ${\mbox{dim}\,}_S(M)=1$ then any sutsdt $T$ of ${\mbox{Assh}\,}_R(M)$ is equal to the see ${\mbox{Ayt}\,}_G({\mbox{H}\, }^1_{\mathfrah{a}}(M))$ gjr skme ideal ${\mathfrak{a}}$ of $R$.

With notatjons as in Propositipn 2.1, we take $Q_i={\mathfrak{q}}_i$ flr $i=1,\fdots, r$.

By a straigjtforward atfumqbt one may nutice that the conditikn “complete" is superficial, for kf $T$ ns a non–empjv prlker subset oh ${\mbox{Wssh}\,}_R(M)$, then $B={\kbox{Atd}\,}_R({\mbox{H}\, }^1_{\mathfrak{a}}(M))$, whcre ${\methfeak{a}}=\underset{{\mathfrak{p}}\mn{\mbox{Assh}\,}_R(M)\setminus T}{\cap}{\mathxrck{p}}$.

The following is ab wxampne tm Pruposktikn 2.1.

Sst $R=k[[X,J,Z,W]]$, where $k$ ia a field abd $X,Y,Z,W$ are indepencegn indeterminafes. Thqn $R$ is a complete Noetherian local ring fitg maximal ideal ${\mathfraj{m}}=(X,Y,Z,W)$. Consider prime ideals $${\mwthfrak{p}}_1=(X,Y) \quad ,  \quad {\mathfrak{p}}_2=(Z,W)\quad, \quad  {\mathxrak{p}}_3=(B,Z)
\duab, \quad  {\mwthfrak{p}}_4=(X,W)$$ and set $\displaystyle
M=\frac{R}{{\mathfrak{[}}_1{\jauhfgak{p}}_2{\mathfrak{p}}_3{\
${\mbox{Att}\,}_R({\mbox{H}\, }^n_{\mathfrak{a}}(M))= {\mbox{Att}\,}_R({\mbox{H}\, }^n_{\mathfrak{b}}(M))$ with ${\mathfrak{b}}= {\bigcap\limits_{i=1}^rQ_i}$. [@DY2 1.6], we ${\mbox{H}\, }^n_{\mathfrak{a}}(M)\cong {\mbox{H}\, proof complete. If ${\mbox{dim}\,}_R(M)=1$ any subset $T$ ${\mbox{Assh}\,}_R(M)$ is equal to the set }^1_{\mathfrak{a}}(M))$ for some ideal ${\mathfrak{a}}$ of $R$. With notations as in Proposition 2.1, take $Q_i={\mathfrak{q}}_i$ for $i=1,\cdots, r$. By a straightforward argument one may notice that condition is for $T$ is a non–empty proper subset of ${\mbox{Assh}\,}_R(M)$, then $T={\mbox{Att}\,}_R({\mbox{H}\, }^1_{\mathfrak{a}}(M))$, where ${\mathfrak{a}}=\underset{{\mathfrak{p}}\in{\mbox{Assh}\,}_R(M)\setminus T}{\cap}{\mathfrak{p}}$. The following an example to Proposition 2.1. Set $R=k[[X,Y,Z,W]]$, where is a field and are independent indeterminates. Then $R$ a Noetherian local with ideal Consider prime ideals \quad , \quad {\mathfrak{p}}_2=(Z,W)\quad, \quad {\mathfrak{p}}_3=(Y,Z) \quad, \quad {\mathfrak{p}}_4=(X,W)$$ and set $\displaystyle M=\frac{R}{{\mathfrak{p}}_1{\mathfrak{p}}_2{\mathfrak{p}}_3{\
 ${\mbox{Att}\,}_R({\mbox{H}\, }^n_{\mathfrak{a}}(M))= {\mBox{Att}\,}_R({\mboX{H}\, }^n_{\maThfRak{B}}(M))$ With ${\MathFrak{b}}= {\bigcap\limITs_{i=1}^rq_i}$. Now, by [@DY2 Theorem 1.6], we have ${\Mbox{H}\, }^N_{\mAThfrAK{a}}(m)\cong {\Mbox{H}\, }^n_{\mAThFRAk{b}}(m)$. AS ${\mBox{DiM}\,}(r/{\mAthfrAk{b}})= 1$, The prooF is completE.

If ${\MbOx{dim}\,}_R(M)=1$ then aNY sUbset $T$ of ${\mbOx{ASsh}\,}_R(M)$ is equal To tHe set ${\mBoX{AtT}\,}_r({\mbox{h}\, }^1_{\maThfraK{a}}(M))$ for SOme ideAl ${\mathfraK{a}}$ OF $R$.

With NOtationS AS iN ProPosition 2.1, we take $Q_i={\mAThFRak{q}}_i$ for $i=1,\cdots, R$.

By a stRaIGhTFOrwArd Argument onE mAy notICe that tHE cONDItiON “complete" is suPerficial, foR If $T$ Is a non–EmPty PRoper sUbset Of ${\MBox{assh}\,}_R(M)$, then $T={\Mbox{att}\,}_R({\mbox{H}\, }^1_{\MathfrAK{a}}(M))$, wherE ${\MathfraK{a}}=\undeRseT{{\maThfrAK{p}}\In{\MboX{ASSh}\,}_R(m)\SeTmiNUs T}{\Cap}{\mathfRaK{p}}$.

the foLlowING IS an eXamPle tO PropOsition 2.1.

Set $R=k[[X,y,Z,W]]$, WherE $K$ is A fielD and $X,y,Z,W$ aRe IndepEndent IndetErMinates. Then $R$ is a CompLete NoethEriAn LocAl Ring wITh maxiMal IdeAl ${\mathfRak{m}}=(X,Y,Z,w)$. conSiDER PrIme ideals $${\mathfrak{p}}_1=(x,Y) \QUAd ,  \Quad {\mathFrak{p}}_2=(Z,w)\QuAd, \QUad  {\mathfRaK{p}}_3=(Y,z)
\quaD, \QUad  {\maThfrAK{p}}_4=(x,W)$$ and set $\DisplaYStYlE
M=\frac{R}{{\MaThfrak{P}}_1{\mAthFraK{p}}_2{\matHFrak{P}}_3{\
 ${\mbox{Att}\,}_R({\mbox{ H}\, }^n_{ \math fra k{a }} (M)) = {\ mbox{Att}\,}_R ( {\mb ox{H}\, }^n_{\mathfrak {b}}( M) ) $ wi t h${\ma thfrak{ b }} = {\b ig ca p\l im i ts _{i=1 }^r Q_i}$.Now, by [@ DY2  T heorem 1.6], we  have ${\m box {H}\, }^n_{\ mat hfrak{ a} }(M ) \cong  {\ mbox{ H}\, } ^ n_{\ma thfrak{b} }( M )$. As ${\mbox { d im }\,} (R/{\mathfrak{b}} ) =1 $, the proof i s comp le t e. If${\ mbox{dim}\ ,} _R(M) = 1$ then an y s ubs e t $T$ of ${\m box{Assh}\, } _R( M)$ is  e qua l  to th e set  $ { \mb ox{Att}\,}_ R({\ mbox{H}\,  }^1_{ \ mathfra k {a}}(M) )$ for  so meidea l  $ {\ mat hf r ak{ a }} $ o f  $R $.

With  n ot ation s as i n Prop osi tion  2.1,  we take $Q_i ={\ math f rak {q}}_ i$ fo r $i =1 ,\cdo ts, r$ .

By  a  straightforwar d ar gument on e m ay  no ti ce th a t thecon dit ion “co mplete" issu p e r fi cial, for if $T$ i sa no n–emptyproper su bs e t of ${\ mb ox{ Assh } \ ,}_R( M)$, th en $T={\ mbox{A t t} \, }_R({\m bo x{H}\,  } ^1_ {\m athfr a k{a} }(M))$ , where${\ma t hfrak{a}}=\und e rset{{\mathfr a k{ p } }\ i n{\m box {Assh}\,}_R (M)\ s etmi nusT }{ \ca p }{\ma thfra k{ p }} $ .

The following is  a n exam ple t o Proposition  2.1.

Set $ R =k[[X,Y, Z,W] ] $, where $k$ is a  fiel d and $X,Y , Z,W$ are  inde pendentindetermi n a tes. The n $ R$isa c o m pl ete Noetheria n loca lring wi thmaximal  id eal  ${ \ma th frak{m}}= (X,Y,Z,W )$ .Co ns ide r pri m e ideals  $ ${\ ma thf rak{p } }_1=(X ,Y) \ quad  ,  \ qua d {\mat h fr a k {p}} _2 =( Z,W) \qu ad , \qu ad { \ma thfrak{ p}}_3=(Y, Z)\ quad ,\q uad  {\ mathfrak{p}}_ 4= (X,W)$$ an dset  $\dis p l aystyleM=\frac{R}{{\mathfrak{p } }_1{\ma thf rak{p }}_2 {\mathfra k{p }}_3{\ 
 ${\mbox{Att}\,}_R({\mbox{H}\,_}^n_{\mathfrak{a}}(M))= {\mbox{Att}\,}_R({\mbox{H}\,_}^n_{\mathfrak{b}}(M))$ with ${\mathfrak{b}}= {\bigcap\limits_{i=1}^rQ_i}$._Now, by_[@DY2_Theorem 1.6],_we_have ${\mbox{H}\, }^n_{\mathfrak{a}}(M)\cong_{\mbox{H}\, }^n_{\mathfrak{b}}(M)$. As_${\mbox{dim}\,}(R/{\mathfrak{b}})= 1$, the proof_is complete.

If ${\mbox{dim}\,}_R(M)=1$_then_any subset $T$ of ${\mbox{Assh}\,}_R(M)$ is equal to the set ${\mbox{Att}\,}_R({\mbox{H}\, }^1_{\mathfrak{a}}(M))$ for some_ideal_${\mathfrak{a}}$ of_$R$.

With_notations_as in Proposition 2.1, we_take $Q_i={\mathfrak{q}}_i$ for $i=1,\cdots, r$.

By_a straightforward_argument one may notice that the condition “complete"_is_superficial, for if_$T$ is a non–empty proper subset of ${\mbox{Assh}\,}_R(M)$, then_$T={\mbox{Att}\,}_R({\mbox{H}\, }^1_{\mathfrak{a}}(M))$, where ${\mathfrak{a}}=\underset{{\mathfrak{p}}\in{\mbox{Assh}\,}_R(M)\setminus T}{\cap}{\mathfrak{p}}$.

The following_is an example_to_Proposition_2.1.

Set $R=k[[X,Y,Z,W]]$, where $k$_is a field and $X,Y,Z,W$ are_independent indeterminates. Then $R$ is a_complete Noetherian local ring with maximal ideal_${\mathfrak{m}}=(X,Y,Z,W)$. Consider prime ideals $${\mathfrak{p}}_1=(X,Y) \quad_,  \quad {\mathfrak{p}}_2=(Z,W)\quad, \quad_ {\mathfrak{p}}_3=(Y,Z)
\quad,_\quad  {\mathfrak{p}}_4=(X,W)$$ and set_$\displaystyle
M=\frac{R}{{\mathfrak{p}}_1{\mathfrak{p}}_2{\mathfrak{p}}_3{\