The nature of faint and fast TDEs
---------------------------------

Based on the light curve comparisons in section \[sec:phot\], AT2019qiz appears to be the second faintest and fastest among known TDEs. To better quantify this statement, we examine the comprehensive TDE sample from @vanVelzen2020, and define a ‘faint and fast’ TDE as one with a peak blackbody luminosity $\log (L/{\rm erg}\,{\rm s}^{-1})<43.5$ and exponential rise time $t_{\rm r}<15$d. Four events meet these criteria: AT2019qiz, iPTF16fnl, PTF09axc, and AT2019eve. However, @vanVelzen2020 also find that there is no correlation between the rise and decline timescales of TDEs (unlike SNe; @Nicholl2015). AT2019eve is one of the slowest-fading TDEs, and so appears to be qualitatively different from AT2019qiz and iPTF16fnl, which evolve rapidly in both their rise and decline phases. The remaining event, PTF09axc, has little data available after peak to measure the decline timescale, but appears to be more symmetrical than AT2019eve.

Of all optical TDEs with host galaxy mass measurements, iPTF16fnl and AT2019eve are among only four with host masses $\log(M_*/M_\odot)<9.5$ [@vanVelzen2020], the others being AT2017eqx and AT2018lna, which have more typical light curves [@Nicholl2019; @vanVelzen2020]. This suggests that the fastest events may be linked to low mass SMBHs, as proposed by @Blagorodnova2017. However, the case of AT2019qiz demonstrates that similar events can occur in more massive galaxies, and the SMBH mass we measure, $\gtrsim 10^6$, is typical of known TDEs [@Wevers2019; @Mockler2019].

We also found that AT2019qiz is similar to iPTF16fnl in its spectroscopic properties at early times (though the strong narrow component in the Balmer lines at later times, possibly associated with an existing BLR, was not observed in iPTF16fnl; @Blagorodnova2017 [@Onori2019]). Both are classified as TDE-Bowen by @vanVelzen2020
The nature of faint and fast TDEs 
 --------------------------------- 

 Based on the light curvature comparison in section \[sec: phot\ ], AT2019qiz appears to be the second faintest and fast among known TDEs. To better quantify this argument, we examine the comprehensive TDE sample from @vanVelzen2020, and specify a ‘ faint and fast ’ TDE as one with a peak black body luminosity $ \log (L/{\rm erg}\,{\rm s}^{-1})<43.5 $ and exponential rise time $ t_{\rm r}<15$d. Four events meet these standard: AT2019qiz, iPTF16fnl, PTF09axc, and AT2019eve. However, @vanVelzen2020 also find that there is no correlation between the rise and worsen timescales of TDEs (unlike SNe; @Nicholl2015). AT2019eve is one of the slowest - fading TDEs, and so appears to be qualitatively unlike from AT2019qiz and iPTF16fnl, which evolve rapidly in both their emanation and decline phase. The remaining event, PTF09axc, has little data available after flower to measure the decline timescale, but appears to be more symmetrical than AT2019eve. 

 Of all optical TDEs with server galaxy mass measurements, iPTF16fnl and AT2019eve are among only four with host masses $ \log(M_*/M_\odot)<9.5 $ [ @vanVelzen2020 ], the others being AT2017eqx and AT2018lna, which have more typical light curves [ @Nicholl2019; @vanVelzen2020 ]. This propose that the fastest events may be yoke to depleted mass SMBHs, as proposed by @Blagorodnova2017. However, the case of AT2019qiz attest that similar events can occur in more massive galaxies, and the SMBH bulk we measure, $ \gtrsim 10 ^ 6 $, is typical of known TDEs [ @Wevers2019; @Mockler2019 ]. 

 We also found that AT2019qiz is similar to iPTF16fnl in its spectroscopic place at early times (though the strong narrow component in the Balmer lines at later time, possibly consociate with an existing BLR, was not observed in iPTF16fnl; @Blagorodnova2017 [ @Onori2019 ]). Both are classified as TDE - Bowen by @vanVelzen2020
The nature of faint and fasu TDEs
---------------------------------

Based on thg oight rurve ckmparisovs in section \[sec:phot\], AT2019qiz eppeqrs ti be the second faintert and fadtest aming jbown TDEs. Vk bettev quahbify chms statement, we examine tve comprehensiee TBE sample from @vanVelzen2020, and define w ‘faint ajd fast’ TDE as one rith a peak blackbody luminosity $\log (L/{\dm erg}\,{\rk s}^{-1})<43.5$ and exponrntial rise time $t_{\rm r}<15$d. Fokr egents meet these cgiteria: AT2019quz, i[RF16fnl, PTF09axc, and AT2019eve. However, @vanBelzen2020 also find that there is vo coxrelation bgcqeej the rise aid decjine timescales of TGEs (unloke SNe; @Nicholk2015). AV2019eve is one of the slowesv-fading TDEs, and so wppears tm ye qualitatively diffwrwnt ftom AD2019qiz qnd iPUF16fil, shich fvomve rapidlg in both tyeir rise and declime inases. The rejainind qvent, PTF09axc, has little data available dftsr peak to measure the eecline timescale, but appears eo be more symmetrical than AT2019eve.

Of all optical TGEs wmtf hisb gauqxj mass measurements, iPTF16fnl and AT2019eve are amogf pnky four with hjst masses $\koh(M_*/K_\jdot)<9.5$ [@vanVelzev2020], the othsrs being AT2017eqx anf AT2018lna, whicy have mowe tupical light curves [@Nicholl2019; @vanVelzen2020]. Tkis suggests that the fastest evznts msy be linked to low mass SMBKs, as lroposed by @Blagorodhuva2017. However, the zasv of AT2019qiz dtoonstrates that symilar evxnts ean occuf in more iassive gapaxies, and the SMBH mass we mgasure, $\gtrsim 10^6$, id typical of known TDEs [@Wevers2019; @Mockler2019].

We also fmung that AC2019qiz ix similar to yPTF16fnl in its spectrjscopkc propertpes at eacly times (thjugh the stroth narrow com'onent in the Balner lindr at later timrs, possibly associared with an existikg BLT, sas not observeb un iPTF16fnl; @Blagproanoda2017 [@Oiori2019]). Fmth are clasvifidd xx TDE-Cowen by @vakVeuzen2020
The nature of faint and fast TDEs on light curve in section \[sec:phot\], second and fastest among TDEs. To better this statement, we examine the comprehensive sample from @vanVelzen2020, and define a ‘faint and fast’ TDE as one with peak blackbody luminosity $\log (L/{\rm erg}\,{\rm s}^{-1})<43.5$ and exponential rise time $t_{\rm r}<15$d. events these AT2019qiz, PTF09axc, and AT2019eve. However, @vanVelzen2020 also find that there is no correlation between the rise and timescales of TDEs (unlike SNe; @Nicholl2015). AT2019eve is of the slowest-fading TDEs, so appears to be qualitatively from and iPTF16fnl, evolve in their rise and phases. The remaining event, PTF09axc, has little data available after peak to measure the decline timescale, but to be than AT2019eve. all TDEs host galaxy mass and AT2019eve are among only four $\log(M_*/M_\odot)<9.5$ [@vanVelzen2020], the others being AT2017eqx and AT2018lna, have more light curves [@Nicholl2019; @vanVelzen2020]. This suggests the fastest events may be linked to low SMBHs, as proposed by @Blagorodnova2017. However, the case of AT2019qiz demonstrates that similar events can more massive galaxies, and SMBH mass we $\gtrsim is of TDEs [@Wevers2019; We also found that AT2019qiz is similar to iPTF16fnl in its properties at early times (though the strong narrow component in lines later times, possibly with an existing BLR, not in iPTF16fnl; @Blagorodnova2017 [@Onori2019]). classified TDE-Bowen
The nature of faint and fast TDes
---------------------------------

Based on tHe ligHt cUrvE cOmpaRisoNs in section \[sec:PHot\], At2019qiz appears to be the secoNd faiNtESt anD FaStest Among knOWn tdes. TO bEtTer QuANtIfy thIs sTatemenT, we examine The CoMprehensive Tde sAmple from @vAnVElzen2020, and defiNe a ‘Faint aNd FasT’ tDE as One With a Peak blACkbody LuminositY $\lOG (L/{\rm erG}\,{\Rm s}^{-1})<43.5$ and eXPOnEntiAl rise time $t_{\rm r}<15$d. FoUR eVEnts meet these cRiteriA: At2019QiZ, IpTF16Fnl, pTF09axc, and At2019eVe. HowEVer, @vanVELzEN2020 ALso FInd that there iS no correlatIOn bEtween ThE riSE and deCline TiMEscAles of TDEs (uNlikE SNe; @NichoLl2015). AT2019evE Is one of THe sloweSt-fadiNg TdEs, And sO ApPeArs To BE quALiTatIVelY differeNt FrOm AT2019qIz anD Iptf16fnl, WhiCh evOlve rApidly in both tHeiR risE And DecliNe phaSes. THe RemaiNing evEnt, PTf09aXc, has little data AvaiLable afteR peAk To mEaSure tHE decliNe tImeScale, buT appearS To bE mORE SyMmetrical than AT2019eve.

of ALL oPtical TDes with HOsT gALaxy mass MeAsuRemeNTS, iPTF16Fnl aND At2019eve are aMong onLY fOuR with hoSt Masses $\LoG(M_*/M_\OdoT)<9.5$ [@vanVELzen2020], The othErs being aT2017eqx ANd AT2018lna, which haVE more typical lIGhT CUrVEs [@NiChoLl2019; @vanVelzen2020]. this SUggeSts tHAt The FAstesT evenTs MAy BE linked to low mass SMBhs, As propOsed bY @Blagorodnova2017. however, the CASE of AT2019qiz DemoNStRAtes that similaR evenTs can occur IN more masSive gAlaxies, aNd the SMBH MASs we measUre, $\GtrSim 10^6$, Is tYPIcAl of known TDEs [@wEVers2019; @moCkler2019].

We AlsO found tHat aT2019qIz iS siMiLar to iPTF16Fnl in its SpEcTrOsCopIc proPErties at EaRly TiMes (ThougH The strOng naRrow CoMpONenT in the BALmER LineS aT lAter TimEs, PossiBly aSSocIated wiTh an existIng blR, waS nOt ObserveD in iPTF16fnl; @BlaGoRodnova2017 [@OnoRi2019]). botH are clASSified as tDE-Bowen by @vanVelzen2020
The nature of faint and fa st TDEs
-- ----- --- --- -- ---- ---- ----------

Ba s ed o n the light curve comp ariso ns in s e ct ion \ [sec:ph o t\ ] ,  AT 20 19 qiz  a p pe ars t o b e the s econd fain tes tand fastesta mo ng known T DEs . To betterqua ntifyth iss tatem ent , weexamin e  the c omprehens iv e  TDE s a mple fr o m  @ vanV elzen2020, and de f in e  a ‘faint andfast’TD E  a s one  wi th a peakbl ackbo d y lumin o si t y $\l o g (L/{\rm erg }\,{\rm s}^ { -1} )<43.5 $and expone ntial  r i setime $t_{\r m r} <15$d. Fo ur eve n ts meet these c riteri a:AT2 019q i z,  i PTF 16 f nl, PT F09 a xc,  and AT2 01 9e ve. H owev e r , @van Vel zen2 020 a lso find that  th erei s n o cor relat ionbe tween  the r ise a nd  decline timesc ales  of TDEs(un li keSN e; @N i choll2 015 ).AT2019e ve is o n e o ft h e  s lowest-fading TDEs ,a n dso appea rs tob equ a litative ly  di ffer e n t fro m AT 2 01 9qiz and  iPTF1 6 fn l,  whichev olve r ap idl y i n bot h  the ir ris e and de cline phases. The re m aining event, PT F 0 9a x c, h aslittle data  ava i labl e af t er  pe a k tomeasu re th e  decline timescale,  b ut app earsto be more sy mmetricalt h a n AT2019 eve. 
O f  all optical T DEs w ith host g a laxy mas s mea surement s, iPTF16 f n l and AT 201 9ev e a rea m on g only four w i t h ho st  masses  $\ log(M_* /M_ \od ot) <9. 5$  [@vanVel zen2020] ,th eot her s bei n g AT2017 eq x a nd  AT 2018l n a, whi ch ha ve m or et ypi cal lig h tc u rves  [ @N icho ll2 01 9; @v anVe l zen 2020].This sugg est s  tha tth e faste st events may  b e linked t olow  massS M BHs, asproposed by @Blagorodno v a2017.How ever,  the  case ofAT2 019qiz  de m onstra tes th at si mi lar e vents c an  oc cu r in morem a ssi ve ga la xies , and t he SMBH mass we me a sur e, $\gtrsim 1 0^6 $, i s ty pic a lo f k no w n T D E s [@Wevers2019;  @Mockler2 01 9 ]. 

We alsof oun dthat AT 2019qiz  is s i milar t o iPTF16f nl in its  s pect r o sco pic proper ties atearly tim e s (th o ug h the  st rong n ar row  comp onenti n t he Ba lmer l in es atlater  t imes, po ssibly associated withan exi sting  BL R, was no t o b ser ved in iP TF16 fnl; @Blag oro dno va201 7 [ @ Onori 2019 ] ).  Bo t h are  cla s sified as TD E-B o w en  by @vanVel z e n 202 0
The nature_of faint_and fast TDEs
---------------------------------

Based on_the light_curve_comparisons in_section_\[sec:phot\], AT2019qiz appears_to be the_second faintest and fastest_among known TDEs._To_better quantify this statement, we examine the comprehensive TDE sample from @vanVelzen2020, and define_a_‘faint and_fast’_TDE_as one with a peak_blackbody luminosity $\log (L/{\rm erg}\,{\rm_s}^{-1})<43.5$ and_exponential rise time $t_{\rm r}<15$d. Four events meet_these_criteria: AT2019qiz, iPTF16fnl,_PTF09axc, and AT2019eve. However, @vanVelzen2020 also find that there_is no correlation between the rise_and decline timescales_of_TDEs_(unlike SNe; @Nicholl2015). AT2019eve_is one of the slowest-fading TDEs,_and so appears to be qualitatively_different from AT2019qiz and iPTF16fnl, which evolve_rapidly in both their rise and_decline phases. The remaining event,_PTF09axc, has_little data available after peak_to measure the_decline timescale,_but appears to_be more symmetrical than AT2019eve.

Of all_optical TDEs with_host galaxy mass measurements, iPTF16fnl and_AT2019eve_are among only_four_with_host masses_$\log(M_*/M_\odot)<9.5$ [@vanVelzen2020], the_others_being AT2017eqx_and_AT2018lna, which have more typical light_curves_[@Nicholl2019; @vanVelzen2020]. This suggests that the fastest_events may be linked_to_low mass SMBHs, as_proposed by @Blagorodnova2017. However, the_case of AT2019qiz demonstrates that similar_events can_occur in_more massive galaxies, and the SMBH mass we measure, $\gtrsim 10^6$,_is typical of known TDEs [@Wevers2019;_@Mockler2019].

We also found that_AT2019qiz is_similar_to iPTF16fnl in_its_spectroscopic properties_at early times (though the strong narrow_component in_the Balmer lines at later times,_possibly associated with an_existing_BLR, was not observed in iPTF16fnl;_@Blagorodnova2017 [@Onori2019]). Both are classified as_TDE-Bowen by @vanVelzen2020