}$$ is the free-field part of the $\varphi$ hamiltonian, plus counterterms (some of which involve the $\chi$ field) that are necessary to remove infinities in this composite operator.

Eq. (\[n2\]) is a highly plausible definition of the heavy particle number density (at low temperatures). However, it does not correspond in any obvious way to how this number density would be determined experimentally. Standard methods all involve a search for individual, on-shell $\varphi$ particles. Real-world examples of this include present-day dark matter searches, and measurements of the cosmic microwave background radiation. Therefore, it is possible to suspect that the definition (\[n2\]) is not appropriate, and this is the reason for the surprising lack of Boltzmann suppression in the loop corrections to $n$.

In [@as], this issue was investigated using a simple Caldeira–Leggett model [@cl]. In this exactly solvable model, a “system” (represented by a harmonic oscillator) is coupled to an “environment” (represented by more oscillators) via an “interaction”. We found that, at low temperatures, the “interaction” energy was always comparable to the “system” energy, making the identification of the “system” problematic.

Consider now a slight variation of the MY model, in which the heavy field is complex, and carries a conserved U(1) charge, while the light field remains real and neutral [@ms]. In this model, we can study the charge fluctuations in a given volume $V$. For noninteracting particles, Poisson statistics for the number of positively and negatively charged particles in $V$ results in $$\langle Q^2\rangle = n V.
\label{q2}$$ We see that the charge fluctuations give us a measurement of the total number of heavy particles in a given volume. If $Q$ represents electric charge, we can in principle measure $\langle Q^2\rangle$ without tracking individual heavy particles. Furthermore, it seems highly unlikely that weak interactions could significantly modify eq. (\[q2\]). If $\langle Q^2\rangle$ is either much larger or much smaller than $nV$, then the movements of positive and negative particles into and out of $V$ would have to be highly correlated (in order to suppress or enhance the charge fluctuations in $V$). This is inconsistent with the usual notion of a gas of particles that move freely and independently between occasional scatterings, and would appear to require strong interactions.
} $ $ is the free - field part of the $ \varphi$ hamiltonian, plus counterterms (some of which involve the $ \chi$ sphere) that are necessary to absent infinities in this composite operator. 

 Eq.   (\[n2\ ]) is a highly plausible definition of the heavy atom number density (at low temperature). However, it does not correspond in any obvious way to how this act density would be determined experimentally. Standard method acting all involve a search for individual, on - plate $ \varphi$ particle. Real - world examples of this include present - day black matter searches, and measurements of the cosmic microwave backdrop radiation. Therefore, it is possible to suspect that the definition (\[n2\ ]) is not appropriate, and this is the rationality for the surprising lack of Boltzmann suppression in the loop corrections to $ n$. 

 In [ @as ], this issue was investigated use a simple Caldeira – Leggett model [ @cl ]. In this exactly solvable model, a “ system ” (constitute by a harmonic oscillator) is coupled to an “ environment ” (represented by more oscillators) via an “ interaction ”. We found that, at low temperatures, the “ interaction ” energy was always comparable to the “ system ” department of energy, create the identification of the “ organization ” debatable. 

 Consider now a slight mutant of the MY model, in which the heavy field is complex, and carries a conserved U(1) accusation, while the light field remains real and neutral [ @ms ]. In this mannequin, we can study the charge fluctuations in a given bulk $ V$. For noninteracting particles, Poisson statistics for the act of positively and negatively charged particles in $ V$ results in $ $ \langle Q^2\rangle = n V. 
 \label{q2}$$ We see that the charge fluctuation give us a measurement of the total number of dense particles in a given volume. If $ Q$ represents electric bang, we can in principle measure $ \langle Q^2\rangle$ without chase individual heavy atom. Furthermore, it seems highly improbable that weak interaction could significantly change eq.   (\[q2\ ]). If $ \langle Q^2\rangle$ is either much larger or much small than $ nV$, then the movements of positive and negative particles into and out of $ V$ would have to be highly correlated (in order to suppress or enhance the charge fluctuations in $ V$). This is inconsistent with the common notion of a gas of atom that move freely and independently between occasional scatterings, and would appear to require strong interactions.
}$$ is the free-field part of tme $\varphi$ hamiltonian, pnus cohnterteros (some of which involve the $\cyi$ fitjd) that are necessxry to relove infunitmes in this composite opcxator.

Se. (\[n2\]) iv a highly plauxible defitition of the vexvv particle number density (at low tem[eraturrs). However, it dogs nou cjrreaiokd in any obvious way to how thia numbeg density would br determined experimentallj. Stwndard methods all involve a wearsy for indiviaual, on-shell $\varphi$ patticles. Real-world examples of thks inelude presebt-eay gark matter searbhes, and measmgements of the cosmic microwsve baxkground radiation. Thxrefore, it is possibje to sus[eet that the definitiob (\[b2\]) is tot dppruprixte, aid fhis id tie reason fkr the surpeising lack of Boltemagb suppression in thq joop corrections to $n$.

In [@as], this issue wds jnvestigated using a sinple Caldeira–Leggett lodel [@cl]. Yn this exactly solvable model, a “system” (representad by x hcviubif oscillator) is coupled to an “environment” (repwsstntvd by more oscillctors) via an “intrrwcyyon”. We found jhat, at los temperatures, the “interastion” energy wws akways comparable to the “sysrem” energy, mckibg the identificatnon of the “svstem” kroblekatic.

Consider now a sliyht vadiation of hhe MY mosdl, in which the feany fheld is complex, and carrief a consecved B(1) charge, whike the light fiepd remains real and neutgal [@md]. Hn this mofel, we can study the charge flurvuations in a ghvet volume $V$. Fov noninteractind particles, Ponsson stctistizs for the number of positivqly and negathgely charged particlqs ib $V$ eesults kn $$\langle Q^2\ranble = n V.
\lcyel{q2}$$ We swe that the charge flocfuations give uw a measurement of thd tjtwl ntkber of heavf paftizkes iv a givtu viuume. If $Q$ represents elewtrid charge, we can in pvinciple neasure $\jangle Q^2\ranglr$ without tracking inditidual heavu pwrticles. Furthermore, it seems gighly unpikcly that weak intcracjions could significantly modify eq. (\[q2\]). If $\langle Q^2\raigle$ is either much latger or much smaller jhak $nV$, then thx moveients of [ositive and negativw particles into snd out of $V$ would habe to te hihhly correlated (in order to suppress or enhance the charge fluctuations ib $V$). Thms is inconsiateny witv che usual notmoi of a gas of parnicles that move freely and inde'endently tecween occasional scatterings, sna would appeat to require strong interadtions.
}$$ is the free-field part of the plus (some of involve the $\chi$ remove in this composite Eq. (\[n2\]) is highly plausible definition of the heavy number density (at low temperatures). However, it does not correspond in any obvious to how this number density would be determined experimentally. Standard methods all involve search individual, $\varphi$ Real-world examples of this include present-day dark matter searches, and measurements of the cosmic microwave background Therefore, it is possible to suspect that the (\[n2\]) is not appropriate, this is the reason for surprising of Boltzmann in loop to $n$. In this issue was investigated using a simple Caldeira–Leggett model [@cl]. In this exactly solvable model, a “system” by a is coupled an (represented more oscillators) via We found that, at low temperatures, was always comparable to the “system” energy, making identification of “system” problematic. Consider now a slight of the MY model, in which the heavy is complex, and carries a conserved U(1) charge, while the light field remains real and In this model, we study the charge in given $V$. noninteracting particles, statistics for the number of positively and negatively charged particles in results in $$\langle Q^2\rangle = n V. \label{q2}$$ We see charge give us a of the total number heavy in a given volume. represents charge, principle $\langle without tracking individual heavy Furthermore, it seems highly unlikely weak interactions could significantly Q^2\rangle$ is either much larger or much smaller $nV$, then the movements of positive and particles into and out of $V$ would have to be highly correlated order to enhance the charge fluctuations in $V$). This is with the usual notion a gas of particles that move freely and independently occasional and would to require strong
}$$ is the free-field part of the $\vaRphi$ hamiltOnian, PluS coUnTertErms (Some of which invOLve tHe $\chi$ field) that are necesSary tO rEMove INfInitiEs in thiS CoMPOsiTe OpEraToR.

eq. (\[N2\]) is a hIghLy plausIble definiTioN oF the heavy parTIcLe number deNsiTy (at low tempeRatUres). HoWeVer, IT does Not CorreSpond iN Any obvIous way to HoW This nuMBer densITY wOuld Be determined experIMeNTally. Standard mEthods AlL InVOLve A seArch for indIvIdual, ON-shell $\vARpHI$ PArtICles. Real-world Examples of tHIs iNclude PrEseNT-day daRk matTeR SeaRches, and meaSureMents of thE cosmiC MicrowaVE backgrOund raDiaTioN. TheREfOrE, it Is POssIBlE to SUspEct that tHe DeFinitIon (\[n2\]) IS NOT appRopRiatE, and tHis is the reasoN foR the SUrpRisinG lack Of BoLtZmann SuppreSsion In The loop correctiOns tO $n$.

In [@as], thiS isSuE waS iNvestIGated uSinG a sImple CaLdeira–LEGgeTt MODEl [@Cl]. In this exactly solVaBLE mOdel, a “sysTem” (repREsEnTEd by a harMoNic OsciLLAtor) iS couPLeD to an “envIronmeNT” (rEpResenteD bY more oScIllAtoRs) via AN “intEractiOn”. We founD that, AT low temperaturES, the “interactiON” eNERgY Was aLwaYs comparablE to tHE “sysTem” eNErGy, mAKing tHe ideNtIFiCAtion of the “system” proBlEmatic.

consiDer now a slight Variation oF THE MY model, In whICh THe heavy field is ComplEx, and carriES a conserVed U(1) cHarge, whiLe the lighT FIeld remaIns ReaL anD neUTRaL [@ms]. In this modeL, WE can StUdy the cHarGe fluctUatIonS in A giVeN volume $V$. FOr nonintErAcTiNg ParTicleS, poisson sTaTisTiCs fOr the NUmber oF posiTiveLy AnD NegAtively CHaRGEd paRtIcLes iN $V$ rEsUlts iN $$\lanGLe Q^2\Rangle = n v.
\label{q2}$$ We See THat tHe ChArge fluCtuations give Us A measuremeNt Of tHe totaL NUmber of hEavy particles in a given voLUme. If $Q$ rEprEsentS eleCtric charGe, wE can in PriNCiple mEasure $\LanglE Q^2\RanGLE$ withOUT tRacKiNg individuAL HeaVy parTiCles. furtherMore, it seems highly uNLikEly that weak inTerActiONS cOulD SiGNifIcANtlY MOdify eq. (\[q2\]). If $\langlE Q^2\rangle$ is EiTHeR much largeR Or mUcH smalleR than $nV$, Then tHE movemeNts of posiTive and neGaTive PARtiCles into anD out of $V$ wOuld have tO Be higHLy CorreLatEd (in orDeR to SupprEss or eNHanCe the Charge FlUctuatIons iN $V$). this is inConsistent with the usual nOtion oF a gas Of pArticles tHat MOve Freely and IndePendently bEtwEen OccasIonAL scatTeriNGs, And WOuld aPpeaR To require STrOng INTeRactions.
}$$ is the free-field part  of the $\ varph i$ham il toni an,plus counterte r ms ( some of which involvethe $ \c h i$ f i el d) th at aren ec e s sar yto  re mo v einfin iti es in t his compos ite  o perator.

Eq .  ( \[n2\]) is  ahighly plaus ibl e defi ni tio n  of t heheavy  parti c le num ber densi ty (at lo w  temper a t ur es).  However, it does no t  correspond in  any o bv i ou s way  to  how thisnu mberd ensityw ou l d bed etermined exp erimentally .  St andard  m eth o ds all  invo lv e  asearch forindi vidual, o n-shel l  $\varp h i$ part icles.  Re al- worl d  e xa mpl es oft hi s i n clu de prese nt -d ay da rk m a t t e r se arc hes,  andmeasurementsofthec osm ic mi crowa ve b ac kgrou nd rad iatio n.  Therefore, itis p ossible t o s us pec tthatt he def ini tio n (\[n2 \]) isn otap p r o pr iate, and this isth e re ason for  the s u rp ri s ing lack  o f B oltz m a nn su ppre s si on in th e loop co rr ections  t o $n$. 
In[@a s], t h is i ssue w as inves tigat e d using a simp l e Caldeira–Le g ge t t  m o del[@c l]. In this  exa c tlysolv a bl e m o del,a “sy st e m” (represented by a h ar monicoscil lator) is cou pled to an “ e nvironme nt”( re p resented by mo re os cillators) via an “ inter action”.  We found t hat, atlow  te mpe rat u r es , the “intera c t ion”  e nergy w asalwayscom par abl e t othe “syst em” ener gy ,ma ki ngthe i d entifica ti onof  th e “sy s tem” p roble mati c. 
C ons ider no w  a s ligh tva riat ion  o f the  MYm ode l, in w hich thehea v y fi el dis comp lex, and carr ie s a conser ve d U (1) ch a r ge, whil e the light field remai n s realand  neut ral[@ms]. In  th is mod el, we can  study  thech arg e fluct u a ti ons  i n a givenv o lum e $V$ .Fornoninte racting particles, Poi sson statisti csfort h enum b er ofpo s iti v e ly and negative ly charged  p a rt icles in $ V $ r es ults in  $$\lan gle Q ^ 2\rangl e = n V.\label{q2 }$ $ We s eethat the c harge fl uctuation s  give us  a me asu rement  o f t he to tal nu m ber  of h eavy p ar ticles  in a  g iven vol ume. If $Q$ representselectr ic ch arg e, we can  in pri nciple me asur e $\langle  Q^ 2\r angle $ w i thout  tra c ki ngi ndivi dual heavy par t ic les . Fu rthermore,i t see ms hi ghl y  unlik elythat weak interac t ions could sig nifi c a ntl y m o dify  e q. (\[q2\]). I f $ \l a n gle Q^2\ ra ngle$ is ei ther muc hl arger  or mu ch sma ller th a n  $ n V$, th en t hemovements  of  p o sitivean dn egativ e pa rt iclesinto a n d ou t of $V$ would hav e tob e  high l y c orrel at ed (ino rder  to suppre ss or enhan ce the  cha rge f luctuat io ns in$V$ ).  This is i n consisten t wit h the u su al n oti on ofa ga s of pa rtic le s t hat movef r ee l yan d  in depe ndent ly  bet ween occa s ional sc att e rings,an d w o u ld app e ar t o requirestr ong i n t eractions. 
}$$ is_the free-field_part of the $\varphi$_hamiltonian, plus_counterterms_(some of_which_involve the $\chi$_field) that are_necessary to remove infinities_in this composite_operator.

Eq. (\[n2\])_is a highly plausible definition of the heavy particle number density (at low temperatures)._However,_it does_not_correspond_in any obvious way to_how this number density would_be determined_experimentally. Standard methods all involve a search for_individual,_on-shell $\varphi$ particles._Real-world examples of this include present-day dark matter searches,_and measurements of the cosmic microwave_background radiation. Therefore,_it_is_possible to suspect that_the definition (\[n2\]) is not appropriate,_and this is the reason for_the surprising lack of Boltzmann suppression in_the loop corrections to $n$.

In [@as],_this issue was investigated using_a simple_Caldeira–Leggett model [@cl]. In this_exactly solvable model,_a “system”_(represented by a_harmonic oscillator) is coupled to an_“environment” (represented by_more oscillators) via an “interaction”. We_found_that, at low_temperatures,_the_“interaction” energy_was always comparable_to_the “system”_energy,_making the identification of the “system”_problematic.

Consider_now a slight variation of the MY_model, in which the_heavy_field is complex, and_carries a conserved U(1) charge,_while the light field remains real_and neutral_[@ms]. In_this model, we can study the charge fluctuations in a given_volume $V$. For noninteracting particles, Poisson_statistics for the number_of positively_and_negatively charged particles_in_$V$ results_in $$\langle Q^2\rangle = n V.
\label{q2}$$ We_see that_the charge fluctuations give us a_measurement of the total_number_of heavy particles in a given_volume. If $Q$ represents electric charge,_we can in principle measure_$\langle_Q^2\rangle$_without tracking individual heavy particles._Furthermore, it seems highly unlikely that_weak interactions could_significantly modify eq. (\[q2\]). If $\langle Q^2\rangle$ is_either_much larger or much smaller than_$nV$,_then the movements of positive and_negative_particles_into and out of $V$_would have to be highly correlated_(in order to suppress or enhance the charge fluctuations_in $V$). This_is inconsistent with the usual_notion_of_a gas of particles that move freely and independently between_occasional scatterings,_and would appear_to require strong interactions.