872            
      GLP          3.1375           2.3051           1.4284           0.9860           0.9831            
     P+XS          1.4588           1.0546           1.3259           0.9967           0.9940            
      NLV      [**1.2073**]{}   [**0.8702**]{}   [**1.0079**]{}   [**0.9977**]{}   [**0.9959**]{}        
     NLVD          1.3580           0.9823           1.3062           0.9967           0.9945            

  : Quantitative evaluation of the fused products on simulated data from RGB aerial images at resolution of 60 cm per pixel. For these experiments, the low-resolution spectral components were registered and the panchro-spectral constraint fulfilled with $\alpha_B=\alpha_G=\alpha_R=\frac{1}{3}$. The numerical results are less competitive than with data at 30 cm, which was highly expected. In general terms, the same conclusions than in Table \[table\_30cm\_RGB\_regist\_linear\] can be drawn for almost all metrics. However, the increasing in spatial distortion because of the reduction in resolution is more noticeable in CS-based methods.[]{data-label="table_60cm_RGB_regist_linear"}

Figure \[fig\_60cm\_s13\_RGB\_regist\_linear\] displays close-ups of the fusion products on the first image from the proposed dataset at a resolution of 60 cm per pixel. The Gaussian standard deviation used for the simulation of the low-resolution spectral components was $\sigma=1.3$. In order to help the visual analysis, Figure \[fig\_60cm\_s13\_RGB\_regist\_linear\_dif\] shows the difference images between the reference one and the result provided by each method. The first conclusion that can be drawn from the visual inspection is the superiority of the variational models under comparison, particularly NLV and NLVD, over CS-based as well as MRA-based techniques. Although P+XS performed well from a quantitive point of view, the pansharpened image shows some annoying color spots. We further observe that CS and MRA families lead to greater spectral and spatial quality loss than NLV and NLVD. For example, see how the color of the fireplaces in the fused products provided by these two classes of approaches is not preserved
872            
       GLP           3.1375            2.3051            1.4284            0.9860            0.9831            
      P+XS           1.4588            1.0546            1.3259            0.9967            0.9940            
       NLV       [ * * 1.2073 * * ] { }    [ * * 0.8702 * * ] { }    [ * * 1.0079 * * ] { }    [ * * 0.9977 * * ] { }    [ * * 0.9959 * * ] { }        
      NLVD           1.3580            0.9823            1.3062            0.9967            0.9945            

  : Quantitative evaluation of the fused products on simulated data from RGB aeriform image at resolution of 60 centimeter per pixel. For these experiment, the low - resolution apparitional components were registered and the panchro - spectral restraint satisfy with $ \alpha_B=\alpha_G=\alpha_R=\frac{1}{3}$. The numerical resultant role are less competitive than with data at 30 cm, which was highly have a bun in the oven. In cosmopolitan terms, the same stopping point than in Table \[table\_30cm\_RGB\_regist\_linear\ ] can be drawn for almost all prosody. However, the increasing in spatial distortion because of the reduction in solution is more noticeable in CS - based methods.[]{data - label="table_60cm_RGB_regist_linear " } 

 Figure \[fig\_60cm\_s13\_RGB\_regist\_linear\ ] displays near - ups of the fusion products on the first image from the proposed dataset at a settlement of 60 cm per pixel. The Gaussian standard deviation used for the simulation of the low - resolution spectral components was $ \sigma=1.3$. In order to help the visual analysis, Figure \[fig\_60cm\_s13\_RGB\_regist\_linear\_dif\ ] shows the difference images between the reference one and the result supply by each method. The first ending that can be describe from the visual inspection is the superiority of the variational model under comparison, particularly NLV and NLVD, over CS - based as well as MRA - based technique. Although P+XS performed well from a quantitive point of view, the pansharpened image shows some annoying color spot. We further observe that CS and MRA families lead to great apparitional and spatial timbre personnel casualty than NLV and NLVD. For example, see how the color of the fireplace in the fused products provided by these two classes of approaches is not preserved
872            
      GLP          3.1375           2.3051           1.4284           0.9860           0.9831            
     P+ZS          1.4588           1.0546           1.3259           0.9967           0.9940            
      KLV      [**1.2073**]{}   [**0.8702**]{}   [**1.0079**]{}   [**0.9977**]{}   [**0.9959**]{}        
     NLVD          1.3580           0.9823           1.3062           0.9967           0.9945            

  : Quameitafpvt evaluation of the fused producta on sikulated data grom RGB aerial images at gesopution of 60 cm per oixel. For tyese wxperiments, ghe low-resolution specjral components were registered xnd tke panchro-skzxtrwn constrainv fulfplled with $\alina_B=\alpva_G=\alphs_R=\frac{1}{3}$. The numcrican rwsults are less compevitive than with datw at 30 cm, fhnch was highly expectwd. In ggneran tefns, ghe seme conclksikns than ih Table \[taboe\_30cm\_RGB\_regist\_linear\] cwb be drawn fod almoft all metrics. However, the increasing in vpafial distortion because of the reduction in tesolution is more noticeable in CS-based methods.[]{data-label="tatle_60cm_CGC_reylfg_oijear"}

Figure \[fig\_60cm\_s13\_RGB\_regist\_linear\] displays clofs-uks pf the fusion iroducts on the fitsh oiage from the proposed dataset at a resopution jf 60 cn per pixtl. Thr Gaussian standard deviatiin used for nhe wimulation of the pow-resolutiun skectrak components was $\sigma=1.3$. Nn ordsr to help hhe visuam analysis, Figure \[fin\_60cm\_v13\_RGB\_regist\_linear\_dif\] shows ehe diffecence images beteeen tre referenfe onc and the result prlvideb by aach methof. The first conclusion that can be drawn from tve nisual infpectlon is the supewiority of the variatnonal oodels undvr comparmson, particujarly NLV and JLVD, over CS-uased as rell as NRA-basea techniques. Alyhough P+XS performee well from a quanbitivg loint of view, tkt pqnsharpened imabe rhors spmq annoying conor rpogx. We wurther obscrvd thst CS and MRA familias lsad to greater spevtval and skatial quwlity loss thsn NLV and NLVD. Fog exakplx, see now the color of the fireplaces ih the fusfd iroducts provyded by these twp classes of approaches is not preservev
872 GLP 3.1375 2.3051 1.4284 0.9860 0.9831 1.0546 0.9967 0.9940 [**1.2073**]{} [**0.8702**]{} [**1.0079**]{} 1.3062 0.9945 : Quantitative of the fused on simulated data from RGB aerial at resolution of 60 cm per pixel. For these experiments, the low-resolution spectral were registered and the panchro-spectral constraint fulfilled with $\alpha_B=\alpha_G=\alpha_R=\frac{1}{3}$. The numerical results are competitive with at cm, which was highly expected. In general terms, the same conclusions than in Table \[table\_30cm\_RGB\_regist\_linear\] can drawn for almost all metrics. However, the increasing spatial distortion because of reduction in resolution is more in methods.[]{data-label="table_60cm_RGB_regist_linear"} Figure displays of fusion products on first image from the proposed dataset at a resolution of 60 cm per pixel. The Gaussian standard used for of the spectral was In order to visual analysis, Figure \[fig\_60cm\_s13\_RGB\_regist\_linear\_dif\] shows the the reference one and the result provided by method. The conclusion that can be drawn from visual inspection is the superiority of the variational under comparison, particularly NLV and NLVD, over CS-based as well as MRA-based techniques. Although P+XS from a quantitive point view, the pansharpened shows annoying spots. further observe CS and MRA families lead to greater spectral and spatial quality than NLV and NLVD. For example, see how the color fireplaces the fused products by these two classes approaches not preserved
872            
      GLP          3.1375           2.3051           1.4284           0.9860           0.9831            
     P+XS          1.4588           1.0546           1.3259           0.9967           0.9940            
      NLV      [**1.2073**]{}   [**0.8702**]{}   [**1.0079**]{}   [**0.9977**]{}   [**0.9959**]{}        
     NLVD          1.3580           0.9823           1.3062           0.9967           0.9945            

  : Quantitative Evaluation Of the FusEd pRoDuctS on sImulated data frOM RGB Aerial images at resolutiOn of 60 cM pER pixEL. FOr theSe experIMeNTS, thE lOw-ResOlUTiOn speCtrAl compoNents were rEgiStEred and the paNChRo-spectral ConStraint fulfiLleD with $\aLpHa_B=\ALpha_G=\AlpHa_R=\frAc{1}{3}$. The nUMericaL results aRe LEss comPEtitive THAn With Data at 30 cm, which was hIGhLY expected. In genEral teRmS, ThE SAme ConClusions thAn In TabLE \[table\_30cM\_rGb\_REGisT\_Linear\] can be drAwn for almosT All MetricS. HOweVEr, the iNcreaSiNG in Spatial distOrtiOn because Of the rEDuction IN resoluTion is MorE noTiceABlE iN CS-BaSEd mEThOds.[]{DAta-Label="tabLe_60Cm_rGB_reGist_LINEAr"}

FiGurE \[fig\_60Cm\_s13\_RGb\_regist\_linear\] DisPlayS CloSe-ups Of the FusiOn ProduCts on tHe firSt Image from the proPoseD dataset aT a rEsOluTiOn of 60 cM Per pixEl. THe GAussian StandarD DevIaTION uSed for the simulatioN oF THe Low-resolUtion sPEcTrAL componeNtS waS $\sigMA=1.3$. in ordEr to HElP the visuAl analYSiS, FIgure \[fiG\_60cM\_s13\_RGB\_rEgIst\_LinEar\_diF\] ShowS the diFference ImageS Between the refeREnce one and the REsULT pROvidEd bY each method. the fIRst cOnclUSiOn tHAt can Be draWn FRoM The visual inspection Is The supEriorIty of the variaTional modeLS UNder compArisON, pARticularly NLV aNd NLVd, over CS-basED as well aS MRA-bAsed techNiques. AltHOUgh P+XS peRfoRmeD weLl fROM a Quantitive poiNT Of viEw, The pansHarPened imAge ShoWs sOme AnNoying colOr spots. WE fUrThEr ObsErve tHAt CS and MrA FamIlIes Lead tO GreateR specTral AnD sPAtiAl qualiTY lOSS thaN NlV And NlVD. foR examPle, sEE hoW the colOr of the fiRepLAces In ThE fused pRoducts providEd By these two ClAssEs of apPROaches is Not preserved
872            
      GLP         3 .1375         2 .305 1           1. 4 284          0.9860         0. 9 831        
   P + X S      1 . 45 88         1. 0546        1.3259        0.9967         0.9940          
    N LV    [**1.2 0 73**]{ }   [**0. 87 0 2**]{}   [**1. 0 0 79 **]{ }   [**0.9977**]{ }  [**0.9959**]{}         NL VD         1 .3 580       0. 9 8 2 3         1.306 2         0.9 967       0.99 45        

  : Qu anti tative ev aluati o n of th e  fusedproduc tsonsimu l at ed  da ta fro m  R GBa eri al image sat  reso luti o n o f 60  cm  per  pixe l. For theseexp erim e nts , the  low- reso lu tionspectr al co mp onents were reg iste red and t hepa nch ro -spec t ral co nst rai nt fulf illed w i th$\ a l p ha _B=\alpha_G=\alpha _R = \ fr ac{1}{3} $. The nu me r ical res ul tsarel e ss co mpet i ti ve thanwith d a ta  a t 30 cm ,whichwa s h igh ly ex p ecte d. Ingeneralterms ,  the same conc l usions than i n  T a b le \[ta ble \_30cm\_RGB \_re g ist\ _lin e ar \]c an be  draw nf or almost all metrics.  H owever , the  increasing i n spatiald i s tortionbeca u se of the reducti on in  resolutio n  is more  noti ceable i n CS-base d methods. []{ dat a-l abe l = "t able_60cm_RGB _ r egis t_ linear" }
Figure\[f ig\ _60 cm\ _s 13\_RGB\_ regist\_ li ne ar \]  di splay s  close-u ps  of  t hefusio n  produ cts o n th efi r stimage f r om t he p ro po seddat as et at  a r e sol ution o f 60 cm p erp ixel .Th e Gauss ian standardde viation us ed  fo r thes i mulation  of the low-resolutions pectral  co mpone ntswas $\sig ma= 1.3$.Ino rder t o help  thevi sua l analy s i s,  Fi gu re \[fig\_ 6 0 cm\ _s13\ _R GB\_ regist\ _linear\_dif\] sho w s t he difference  im ages b et wee n  t h e r ef e ren c e  one and the re sult provi de d  b y each met h od.  T he firs t concl usion that ca n be draw n from th evisu a l  in spection i s the su periority of th e  v ariat ion al mod el s u ndercompar i son , par ticula rl y NLVand N LV D, overCS-based as well as MRA -based  tech niq ues. Alth oug h  P+ XS perfor medwell froma q uan titiv e p o int o f vi e w,  th e  pans harp e ned image sh ows s om e annoyingc o l orspots . W e  furth er o bserve that CS an d  MRA familieslead t o g rea t er s pe ctral and spat ial  q u a lity los sthan NLV an d NLVD.Fo r  exam ple, s ee how  the co l o ro f thefire pla ces in th e f us e d produ ct sp rovide d by  t hese t wo cla s seso f  approaches is n ot pr e s erved 
872 _ _   _ __ 
__  _ GLP _   _  __3.1375           2.3051  __ ___   1.4284 _    _ _  0.9860     __  _ 0.9831       _    
 _  _P+XS__   _    1.4588 _     _   1.0546   _     _ 1.3259   _ _    _0.9967  _ _  _   0.9940  _  _     _
_  ___NLV _  __[**1.2073**]{} __[**0.8702**]{}   [**1.0079**]{}  _[**0.9977**]{}_  [**0.9959**]{}    _   
__   NLVD_    _    1.3580 _ _ _     0.9823     _     1.3062_   _ __  _0.9967_ _      _ 0.9945_     _   __

  : Quantitative evaluation of_the fused products on simulated data_from RGB aerial images at_resolution_of_60 cm per pixel. For_these experiments, the low-resolution spectral components_were registered and_the panchro-spectral constraint fulfilled with $\alpha_B=\alpha_G=\alpha_R=\frac{1}{3}$. The_numerical_results are less competitive than with_data_at 30 cm, which was highly_expected._In_general terms, the same conclusions_than in Table \[table\_30cm\_RGB\_regist\_linear\] can be_drawn for almost all metrics. However, the increasing in_spatial distortion because_of the reduction in resolution_is_more_noticeable in CS-based methods.[]{data-label="table_60cm_RGB_regist_linear"}

Figure \[fig\_60cm\_s13\_RGB\_regist\_linear\] displays close-ups of the fusion_products on_the first image_from the proposed dataset at a resolution of 60 cm_per pixel. The Gaussian standard deviation used_for the simulation of the low-resolution spectral components was $\sigma=1.3$. In_order to help the visual analysis, Figure \[fig\_60cm\_s13\_RGB\_regist\_linear\_dif\]_shows the difference images between the reference_one and the result_provided_by each method. The first conclusion that_can_be_drawn_from the visual_inspection is the_superiority of the_variational models_under comparison, particularly_NLV and_NLVD, over CS-based_as_well as MRA-based techniques. Although P+XS performed well from a quantitive point of view, the pansharpened image shows_some annoying color spots. We further_observe that CS and MRA_families_lead to greater_spectral and spatial quality_loss than NLV and NLVD. For example, see_how the color of the fireplaces in the fused_products_provided by_these two classes of_approaches is_not preserved