}
\frac{x}{\vartheta} = \frac1{\alpha^2}  \int_{\mathfrak{t}\in \mathbb{P}_\theta}\exp\left\{\frac{\mathfrak{u}(\mathfrak{t})-\theta}{\alpha}\right\}d\mathfrak{t}$$ depends on the details of the pattern $\mathfrak{u}(\mathfrak{t})$ in the vicinity of its maximum $\theta$. Nevertheless, these details seem not to be too essential; they determine mainly some cofactors of order unity, see also Ref. [@we1].

To justify the latter statements, first, Figure \[F8\] depicts two trajectories $\mathfrak{u}(\mathfrak{t})$ implementing the peak $\mathbb{P}_\theta$. The difference in their forms explains the partial independence of the variable $x$ and $\vartheta$. Second, Figure \[F9\] demonstrates the statistical properties of such trajectories. The shown patterns were obtained in the following way. A collection of random trajectories similar to ones shown in Fig. \[F8\] were generated based on Eq.  with the discretization time step of 0.01. All the trajectories started from the point $\mathfrak{u}_u = 1$ and terminated when crossing the boundary $\mathfrak{u}_l = 0$ for the first time. Only the trajectories that passed through the layer $(\theta,\theta+1)$ with $\theta = 10$ without touching the upper boundary $\theta+1 = 11$ were taken into account. Then for each trajectory the time moment $\mathfrak{t}_\text{max}$ of attaining the corresponding maximum $\mathfrak{u}_\text{max}$ was fixed and the trajectory as a whole was shifted along the time axis that the point $\mathfrak{t}_\text{max}$ be located at the time origin $\mathfrak{t}=0$. In this way all the trajectories were rearranged that their maxima be located at the same point on the time axis. The total number of the trajectories constructed in this way was equal to $10^5$. Then the plane $\{\mathfrak{t,u}\}$ was partitioned into cells of $0.1\times 0.1$ size and the discretization points of individual trajectories fell into each cell were counted. Finally their numbers were renormalized to the obtained maximum. The left window in Fig. \[F9\] exhibits the obtained distribution of these values called the distribution pattern of $\mathfrak{u(t)}$. Actually this pattern visualizes the regular trend in the
} 
 \frac{x}{\vartheta } = \frac1{\alpha^2 }   \int_{\mathfrak{t}\in \mathbb{P}_\theta}\exp\left\{\frac{\mathfrak{u}(\mathfrak{t})-\theta}{\alpha}\right\}d\mathfrak{t}$$ depends on the details of the pattern $ \mathfrak{u}(\mathfrak{t})$ in the vicinity of its maximum $ \theta$. however, these detail seem not to be too all-important; they decide mainly some cofactors of club one, see also Ref.   [ @we1 ]. 

 To justify the latter statements, foremost, Figure   \[F8\ ] depicts two trajectories $ \mathfrak{u}(\mathfrak{t})$ implementing the peak $ \mathbb{P}_\theta$. The remainder in their forms explains the partial independence of the variable $ x$ and $ \vartheta$. Second, Figure   \[F9\ ] demonstrates the statistical property of such trajectories. The shown patterns were prevail in the following way. A collection of random trajectory similar to one shown in Fig.   \[F8\ ] were generated based on Eq.    with the discretization meter step of 0.01. All the trajectories started from the point $ \mathfrak{u}_u = 1 $ and terminated when crossing the boundary $ \mathfrak{u}_l = 0 $ for the first time. Only the trajectories that passed through the layer $ (\theta,\theta+1)$ with $ \theta = 10 $ without touching the upper boundary $ \theta+1 = 11 $ were taken into account. Then for each trajectory the time here and now $ \mathfrak{t}_\text{max}$ of attaining the corresponding maximal $ \mathfrak{u}_\text{max}$ was situate and the trajectory as a whole was careen along the time axis that the distributor point $ \mathfrak{t}_\text{max}$ be located at the time origin $ \mathfrak{t}=0$. In this way all the trajectory were rearranged that their maxima be located at the same point on the time axis. The total number of the trajectories constructed in this way was equal to $ 10 ^ 5$. Then the airplane $ \{\mathfrak{t, u}\}$ was partitioned into cell of $ 0.1\times 0.1 $ size and the discretization point of individual trajectories fell into each cell were count. Finally their numbers were renormalized to the prevail maximum. The left window in Fig.   \[F9\ ] exhibits the receive distribution of these values called the distribution form of $ \mathfrak{u(t)}$. Actually this pattern visualize the regular tendency in the
}
\fraf{x}{\vartheta} = \frac1{\alpha^2}  \ikt_{\mathfrak{t}\in \majhvb{P}_\theva}\exp\lert\{\frac{\maghfrak{u}(\mathfrak{t})-\theta}{\alpha}\rijht\}d\nathfeak{t}$$ depends on the degails of nhe patteen $\methfrak{u}(\mathfrak{v})$ in the vicinjby of mts maximum $\theja$. Neverthelass, these detahlr deem not to be too essential; they dqterminr lainly some cosactpws or order unity, see also Ref. [@we1].

To jusfify tht latter statementx, first, Figure \[F8\] depicts twl trwjectories $\mathfran{u}(\mathfrak{t})$ impjwmenting the peak $\mathbb{P}_\theta$. The difference in their forms explxins che partial ibdeogndence of tie varpable $x$ and $\vartheta$. Vecond, Gigure \[F9\] demonsbratev tye statistical propervies of such trajectjries. The skown patterns were obrauned hn tve fuolodinf xay. A colpecvion of ransom trajectiries similar to onts fyown in Fig. \[F8\] sere gqnqrated based on Eq.  with the discretizatpon fime step of 0.01. All the teajectories started ftom the poynt $\mathfrak{u}_u = 1$ and terminated when crossing the bounvafy $\nabhfrxj{u}_p = 0$ for the first time. Only the trajectories egau psssed through bhe layer $(\theta,\theya+1)$ wojh $\theta = 10$ witfout toucging the upper boujdary $\treta+1 = 11$ were tahen onto account. Then for each rrajectory tke rime moment $\mathfrck{t}_\text{max}$ oy attaoning the corresponding maxioum $\jathfrak{u}_\tedt{max}$ was wixed and the trxjebtorf as a whole was shifted ajong the vime cxis thag thg point $\mathfrak{t}_\hext{max}$ be located at thf timg orighn $\mathfran{t}=0$. In this way all the trajectocmes were reartanced that thzir mawima be located at the same ppint on the gime axis. Nhe total number of ehe trajectorhgs constructev in this way was equal gu $10^5$. Then the plsne $\{\mathfgah{t,u}\}$ qas partitioned inbo ceums of $0.1\times 0.1$ sivt abd the discretiaatkon pliits os individual drajdctuties well inuj cacf cekl were counted. Finanly fheir numbers were rcnormalizgd to the obtained maxomum. The left windlw in Fij. \[F9\] exhobijs the obtained distribution of these vapuef called the disbribotion pattexn of $\mathfrak{u(t)}$. Actually this pattern vmsualizes the regular jrend in the
} \frac{x}{\vartheta} = \frac1{\alpha^2} \int_{\mathfrak{t}\in \mathbb{P}_\theta}\exp\left\{\frac{\mathfrak{u}(\mathfrak{t})-\theta}{\alpha}\right\}d\mathfrak{t}$$ depends details the pattern in the vicinity these seem not to too essential; they mainly some cofactors of order unity, also Ref. [@we1]. To justify the latter statements, first, Figure \[F8\] depicts two $\mathfrak{u}(\mathfrak{t})$ implementing the peak $\mathbb{P}_\theta$. The difference in their forms explains the partial of variable and Second, Figure \[F9\] demonstrates the statistical properties of such trajectories. The shown patterns were obtained in following way. A collection of random trajectories similar ones shown in Fig. were generated based on Eq. the time step 0.01. the started from the $\mathfrak{u}_u = 1$ and terminated when crossing the boundary $\mathfrak{u}_l = 0$ for the first time. Only trajectories that the layer with = without touching the $\theta+1 = 11$ were taken into each trajectory the time moment $\mathfrak{t}_\text{max}$ of attaining corresponding maximum was fixed and the trajectory as whole was shifted along the time axis that point $\mathfrak{t}_\text{max}$ be located at the time origin $\mathfrak{t}=0$. In this way all the trajectories that their maxima be at the same on time The number of trajectories constructed in this way was equal to $10^5$. Then the $\{\mathfrak{t,u}\}$ was partitioned into cells of $0.1\times 0.1$ size and points individual trajectories fell each cell were counted. their were renormalized to the The window exhibits obtained of these values called distribution pattern of $\mathfrak{u(t)}$. Actually pattern visualizes the regular
}
\frac{x}{\vartheta} = \frac1{\alpha^2}  \int_{\Mathfrak{t}\iN \mathBb{P}_\TheTa}\Exp\lEft\{\fRac{\mathfrak{u}(\maTHfraK{t})-\theta}{\alpha}\right\}d\mathFrak{t}$$ DePEnds ON tHe detAils of tHE pATTerN $\mAtHfrAk{U}(\MaThfraK{t})$ iN the vicInity of its MaxImUm $\theta$. NeverTHeLess, these dEtaIls seem not to Be tOo esseNtIal; THey deTerMine mAinly sOMe cofaCtors of orDeR Unity, sEE also ReF. [@WE1].

TO jusTify the latter statEMeNTs, first, Figure \[F8\] DepictS tWO tRAJecTorIes $\mathfraK{u}(\MathfRAk{t})$ implEMeNTINg tHE peak $\mathbb{P}_\tHeta$. The diffERenCe in thEiR foRMs explAins tHe PArtIal independEnce Of the variAble $x$ aND $\vartheTA$. Second, figure \[f9\] deMonStraTEs ThE stAtIStiCAl ProPErtIes of sucH tRaJectoRies. tHE SHown PatTernS were Obtained in the FolLowiNG waY. A colLectiOn of RaNdom tRajectOries SiMilar to ones showN in FIg. \[F8\] were geNerAtEd bAsEd on EQ.  With thE diScrEtizatiOn time sTEp oF 0.01. ALL THe Trajectories starteD fROM tHe point $\mAthfraK{U}_u = 1$ AnD TerminatEd WheN croSSIng thE bouNDaRy $\mathfrAk{u}_l = 0$ foR ThE fIrst timE. ONly the TrAjeCtoRies tHAt paSsed thRough the Layer $(\THeta,\theta+1)$ with $\tHEta = 10$ without touCHiNG ThE UppeR boUndary $\theta+1 = 11$ Were TAken Into ACcOunT. then fOr eacH tRAjECtory the time moment $\mAtHfrak{t}_\Text{mAx}$ of attaining The correspONDIng maximUm $\maTHfRAk{u}_\text{max}$ was fIxed aNd the trajeCTory as a wHole wAs shifteD along the TIMe axis thAt tHe pOinT $\maTHFrAk{t}_\text{max}$ be lOCAted At The time OriGin $\mathFraK{t}=0$. IN thIs wAy All the traJectorieS wErE rEaRraNged tHAt their mAxIma Be LocAted aT The samE poinT on tHe TiME axIs. The toTAl NUMber Of ThE traJecToRies cOnstRUctEd in thiS way was eqUal TO $10^5$. TheN tHe Plane $\{\maThfrak{t,u}\}$ was paRtItioned intO cEllS of $0.1\timES 0.1$ Size and tHe discretization points oF IndividUal TrajeCtorIes fell inTo eAch celL weRE countEd. FinaLly thEiR nuMBErs weRE ReNorMaLized to the OBTaiNed maXiMum. THe left wIndow in Fig. \[F9\] exhibitS The Obtained distrIbuTion OF ThEse VAlUEs cAlLEd tHE Distribution patTern of $\mathFrAK{u(T)}$. Actually tHIs pAtTern visUalizes The reGUlar treNd in the
}
\frac{x}{\vartheta} = \f rac1{\alph a^2} \i nt_ {\ math frak {t}\in \mathbb { P}_\ theta}\exp\left\{\frac {\mat hf r ak{u } (\ mathf rak{t}) - \t h e ta} {\ al pha }\ r ig ht\}d \ma thfrak{ t}$$ depen dson  the details of  the patte rn$\mathfrak{u }(\ mathfr ak {t} ) $ inthe  vici nity o f  its m aximum $\ th e ta$. N e verthel e s s,  the se details seem n o tt o be too essen tial;th e yd e ter min e mainly s om e cof a ctors o f  o r d e r u n ity, see also  Ref. [@we1 ] .
To jus ti fyt he lat ter s ta t eme nts, first,  Fig ure \[F8\ ] depi c ts twot rajecto ries $ \ma thf rak{ u }( \m ath fr a k{t } )$  im p lem enting t he  p eak $ \mat h b b { P}_\ the ta$.  Thedifference in  th eirf orm s exp lains  the  p artia l inde pende nc e of the variab le $ x$ and $\ var th eta $.  Seco n d, Fig ure  \[ F9\] de monstra t esth e s ta tistical propertie so f  s uch traj ectori e s.  T h e shownpa tte rnsw e re ob tain e din the f ollowi n gwa y. A co ll ection  o f r and om tr a ject oriessimilarto on e s shown in Fig .  \[F8\] wereg en e r at e d ba sed  on Eq.  wi th t h e di scre t iz ati o n tim e ste po f0 .01. All the trajec to ries s tarte d from the po int $\math f r a k{u}_u =  1$a nd terminated whe n cro ssing theb oundary$\mat hfrak{u} _l = 0$ f o r  the fir sttim e.Onl y th e trajectorie s that  p assed t hro ugh the  la yer  $( \th et a,\theta+ 1)$ with  $ \t he ta  =10$ w i thout to uc hin gthe  uppe r  bound ary $ \the ta +1 = 1 1$ were ta k e n in to  a ccou nt.  T hen f or e a chtraject ory the t ime mome nt  $ \mathfr ak{t}_\text{m ax }$ of atta in ing  the c o r respondi ng maximum $\mathfrak{u } _\text{ max }$ wa s fi xed and t hetrajec tor y  as awholewas s hi fte d along t he  ti me  axis that t hepoint  $ \mat hfrak{t }_\text{max}$ be l o cat ed at the tim e o rigi n $\ mat h fr a k{t }= 0 $.I n  this way all t he traject or i es  were rear r ang ed  that t heir ma ximab e locat ed at the  same poi nt  ont h e t ime axis.The tota l numbero f the tr aject ori es con st ruc ted i n this way  wasequalto  $10^5 $. Th en  the pla ne $\{\mathfrak{t,u}\}$  was p artit ion ed into c ell s  of  $0.1\tim es 0 .1$ size a ndthe  disc ret i zatio n po i nt s o f  indi vidu a l traject o ri esf e ll  into eachc e l l w ere c oun t ed. Fi nall y their numbers w e re renormalize d to t heobt a ined  m aximum. The le ftwi n d ow in Fi g.  \[F9\] exh ibits th eo btain ed dis tribut ion oft h es e  value s ca lle d the dis tri bu t ion pat te rn of $\m athf ra k{u(t) }$. Ac t uall y this pattern vis ualiz e s  ther egu lar t re nd in t h e
}
\frac{x}{\vartheta} =_\frac1{\alpha^2} _\int_{\mathfrak{t}\in \mathbb{P}_\theta}\exp\left\{\frac{\mathfrak{u}(\mathfrak{t})-\theta}{\alpha}\right\}d\mathfrak{t}$$ depends on_the details_of_the pattern_$\mathfrak{u}(\mathfrak{t})$_in the vicinity_of its maximum_$\theta$. Nevertheless, these details_seem not to_be_too essential; they determine mainly some cofactors of order unity, see also Ref. [@we1].

To justify_the_latter statements,_first,_Figure \[F8\]_depicts two trajectories $\mathfrak{u}(\mathfrak{t})$ implementing_the peak $\mathbb{P}_\theta$. The difference_in their_forms explains the partial independence of the variable_$x$_and $\vartheta$. Second,_Figure \[F9\] demonstrates the statistical properties of such trajectories. The_shown patterns were obtained in the_following way. A_collection_of_random trajectories similar to_ones shown in Fig. \[F8\] were generated_based on Eq.  with the discretization_time step of 0.01. All the trajectories_started from the point $\mathfrak{u}_u =_1$ and terminated when crossing_the boundary_$\mathfrak{u}_l = 0$ for the_first time. Only_the trajectories_that passed through_the layer $(\theta,\theta+1)$ with $\theta =_10$ without touching_the upper boundary $\theta+1 = 11$_were_taken into account._Then_for_each trajectory_the time moment_$\mathfrak{t}_\text{max}$_of attaining_the_corresponding maximum $\mathfrak{u}_\text{max}$ was fixed and_the_trajectory as a whole was shifted along_the time axis that_the_point $\mathfrak{t}_\text{max}$ be located_at the time origin $\mathfrak{t}=0$._In this way all the trajectories_were rearranged_that their_maxima be located at the same point on the time axis._The total number of the trajectories_constructed in this way_was equal_to_$10^5$. Then the_plane_$\{\mathfrak{t,u}\}$ was_partitioned into cells of $0.1\times 0.1$ size_and the_discretization points of individual trajectories fell_into each cell were_counted._Finally their numbers were renormalized to_the obtained maximum. The left window_in Fig. \[F9\] exhibits the obtained_distribution_of_these values called the distribution_pattern of $\mathfrak{u(t)}$. Actually this pattern_visualizes the regular_trend in the