 only holds if the prefactor $\varepsilon^0$ is not zero. Otherwise, we run into a “$0/0$” situation, which is mathematically not defined. Now, the physical phase space of the process contains a sector, for which $|k_{\parallel}|$ becomes arbitrarily small. This sector is characterized by two angles $(\varphi_0,\vartheta_0)$, where for $\varphi_0=0$, $\vartheta_0\approx 2.35$. This is depicted in Fig. \[fig:zero-contour\].

![Contour of angles $(\varphi_0,\vartheta_0)$, for which the normalization factor $N''$ vanishes. The peaks in Fig. \[fig:plots-matrix-element-square-parameter-choice-3\], lie on this contour.[]{data-label="fig:zero-contour"}](consistency-modmax-parity-odd_v1_fig6_contour-zeros.pdf)

For this special case the normalization factor $N''$ and, therefore, the prefactor $\varepsilon^0$ can become arbitrarily small. This destroys the applicability of the Ward identity and shows up as peaks in $X_{22}$ of Figs. \[fig:plots-matrix-element-square-parameter-choice-2\] and \[fig:plots-matrix-element-square-parameter-choice-3\].

Now we would like to analytically investigate the limit $\mathcal{E}\mapsto 0$ of the second polarization vector, with its transversal part subtracted. We distinguish between two cases, $k_{\parallel}\sim \mathcal{E}k_{\bot}$ and $k_{\parallel}\gg \mathcal{E}k_{\bot}$. The first represents the phase space sector for Compton scattering, for which $k_{\parallel}$ becomes arbitrarily small. We begin with the zeroth component of Eq. : $$\begin{aligned}
\sqrt{N''}\,\varepsilon^{0}&=\frac{1}{4}\big(k^2-(k\cdot\xi)^2\big)\Big((k\cdot \zeta)^2-\zeta^2\big(k^2-(k\cdot\xi)^2\big)\Big) \notag \\
&\sim \left\{\begin{array}{lcl}
\mathcal{E}^2|\mathbf{k}|^2(k_{\parallel}^2+|\mathbf{k}|^2) & \text{for} & k_{\
only holds if the prefactor $ \varepsilon^0 $ is not zero. Otherwise, we run into a “ $ 0/0 $ ” site, which is mathematically not define. Now, the physical phase space of the summons contains a sector, for which $ |k_{\parallel}|$ becomes randomly small. This sector is characterized by two angles $ (\varphi_0,\vartheta_0)$, where for $ \varphi_0=0 $, $ \vartheta_0\approx 2.35$. This is picture in Fig. \[fig: zero - contour\ ]. 

! [ Contour of angles $ (\varphi_0,\vartheta_0)$, for which the standardization factor $ N''$ vanishes. The peaks in Fig. \[fig: plots - matrix - element - straight - parameter - choice-3\ ], lie on this contour.[]{data - label="fig: zero - contour"}](consistency - modmax - parity - odd_v1_fig6_contour - zeros.pdf) 

 For this special case the standardization factor $ N''$ and, therefore, the prefactor $ \varepsilon^0 $ can become arbitrarily little. This destroys the applicability of the Ward identity and shows up as point in $ X_{22}$ of Figs. \[fig: plots - matrix - component - square - parameter - choice-2\ ] and \[fig: plots - matrix - element - square - argument - choice-3\ ]. 

 Now we would like to analytically investigate the limit $ \mathcal{E}\mapsto 0 $ of the second polarization vector, with its transversal part subtracted. We identify between two cases, $ k_{\parallel}\sim \mathcal{E}k_{\bot}$ and $ k_{\parallel}\gg \mathcal{E}k_{\bot}$. The first represents the phase space sector for Compton scattering, for which $ k_{\parallel}$ becomes arbitrarily small. We begin with the zeroth component of Eq. : $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 \sqrt{N''}\,\varepsilon^{0}&=\frac{1}{4}\big(k^2-(k\cdot\xi)^2\big)\Big((k\cdot \zeta)^2-\zeta^2\big(k^2-(k\cdot\xi)^2\big)\Big) \notag \\ 
 & \sim \left\{\begin{array}{lcl } 
 \mathcal{E}^2|\mathbf{k}|^2(k_{\parallel}^2+|\mathbf{k}|^2) & \text{for } & k_{\
 onpy holds if the prefactov $\varepsilon^0$ is uit zerm. Othedwise, we run into a “$0/0$” situation, which iw matyematically not definea. Now, the physicao phese space of the process contajks a vxctor, for which $|k_{\parallel}|$ becomes arbitsafipy small. This sector is characterizqd by teo angles $(\varphi_0,\dartnqta_0)$, shere for $\varphi_0=0$, $\vartheta_0\approx 2.35$. Tgis is vepicted in Fig. \[fig:zero-contour\].

![Contour of wnglfs $(\varphi_0,\vartheta_0)$, vor which tye njemalization wactor $N''$ vanishes. The keaks in Fig. \[fig:plots-matrix-elemevt-squcre-parametet-eyoifg-3\], lie on thiw connour.[]{data-label="npg:zero-cmntour"}](cpnsistency-modmsx-peritt-odd_v1_fig6_contour-zeros.pvf)

For this special cwse the nmrjalization factor $N''$ and, jherexore, rhe prtfartod $\vareosimon^0$ can bedome arbitrqrily small. This dextwiys the applidabiliey of the Ward identity and shows up as ptaks jn $X_{22}$ of Figs. \[fig:plots-marrix-element-square-paraleter-choise-2\] and \[fig:plots-matrix-element-square-parameter-choice-3\].

Tow wx douod uukf to analytically investigate the limit $\mathcwm{E}\kaisto 0$ of the secokd polarization vevtlr, rith its tranrversal pzrt subtracted. We fistingoish bwtween twj caxes, $k_{\parallel}\sim \mathcal{E}k_{\bit}$ and $k_{\parajoel}\gg \mathcal{E}k_{\bot}$. The first xepresgnts tne phase space sector fur Ckmpton scathering, fod which $k_{\parallel}$ bebomev arbitrarily small. We begyn with tie zexoth comoonemt of Qq. : $$\begin{apigned}
\sqrt{N''}\,\varepsilon^{0}&=\fraf{1}{4}\big(k^2-(n\cgot\xi)^2\big)\Bih((k\cdot \zeta)^2-\zeta^2\big(k^2-(k\cdot\xi)^2\big)\Bij) \notag \\
&\sim \lgft\{\tegpn{array}{lcj}
\mathgal{E}^2|\mathbf{k}|^2(k_{\parwllel}^2+|\mathbf{k}|^2) & \jext{for} & h_{\
only holds if the prefactor $\varepsilon^0$ is Otherwise, run into “$0/0$” situation, which the phase space of process contains a for which $|k_{\parallel}|$ becomes arbitrarily small. sector is characterized by two angles $(\varphi_0,\vartheta_0)$, where for $\varphi_0=0$, $\vartheta_0\approx 2.35$. This depicted in Fig. \[fig:zero-contour\]. ![Contour of angles $(\varphi_0,\vartheta_0)$, for which the normalization factor vanishes. peaks Fig. lie on this contour.[]{data-label="fig:zero-contour"}](consistency-modmax-parity-odd_v1_fig6_contour-zeros.pdf) For this special case the normalization factor $N''$ and, therefore, the prefactor can become arbitrarily small. This destroys the applicability the Ward identity and up as peaks in $X_{22}$ Figs. and \[fig:plots-matrix-element-square-parameter-choice-3\]. we like analytically investigate the $\mathcal{E}\mapsto 0$ of the second polarization vector, with its transversal part subtracted. We distinguish between two cases, \mathcal{E}k_{\bot}$ and The first the space for Compton scattering, $k_{\parallel}$ becomes arbitrarily small. We begin component of Eq. : $$\begin{aligned} \sqrt{N''}\,\varepsilon^{0}&=\frac{1}{4}\big(k^2-(k\cdot\xi)^2\big)\Big((k\cdot \zeta)^2-\zeta^2\big(k^2-(k\cdot\xi)^2\big)\Big) \notag &\sim \left\{\begin{array}{lcl} & \text{for} & k_{\
 only holds if the prefactor $\vaRepsilon^0$ is Not zeRo. OTheRwIse, wE run Into a “$0/0$” situation, WHich Is mathematically not defIned. NOw, THe phYSiCal phAse spacE Of THE prOcEsS coNtAInS a secTor, For whicH $|k_{\parallel}|$ BecOmEs arbitrarilY SmAll. This secTor Is characteriZed By two aNgLes $(\VArphi_0,\VarTheta_0)$, Where fOR $\varphI_0=0$, $\vartheta_0\ApPRox 2.35$. ThiS Is depicTED iN Fig. \[Fig:zero-contour\].

![ConTOuR Of angles $(\varphi_0,\VartheTa_0)$, FOr WHIch The NormalizatIoN factOR $N''$ vanisHEs. tHE PeaKS in Fig. \[fig:plotS-matrix-elemENt-sQuare-pArAmeTEr-choiCe-3\], lie On THis Contour.[]{data-LabeL="fig:zero-cOntour"}](COnsisteNCy-modmaX-paritY-odD_v1_fIg6_coNToUr-ZerOs.PDf)

FOR tHis SPecIal case tHe NoRmaliZatiON FACtor $n''$ anD, theReforE, the prefactor $\VarEpsiLOn^0$ cAn becOme arBitrArIly smAll. ThiS destRoYs the applicabilIty oF the Ward iDenTiTy aNd Shows UP as peaKs iN $X_{22}$ oF Figs. \[fiG:plots-mATriX-eLEMEnT-square-parameter-chOiCE-2\] AnD \[fig:plotS-matriX-ElEmENt-square-PaRamEter-CHOice-3\].

NOw we WOuLd like to AnalytICaLlY investIgAte the LiMit $\MatHcal{E}\MApstO 0$ of the Second poLarizATion vector, with ITs transversal PArT SUbTRactEd. WE distinguisH betWEen tWo caSEs, $K_{\paRAllel}\Sim \maThCAl{e}K_{\bot}$ and $k_{\parallel}\gg \mAtHcal{E}k_{\Bot}$. ThE first represeNts the phasE SPAce sectoR for cOmPTon scattering, fOr whiCh $k_{\paralleL}$ Becomes aRbitrArily smaLl. We begin WITh the zerOth ComPonEnt OF eq. : $$\Begin{aligned}
\sQRT{N''}\,\vaRePsilon^{0}&=\fRac{1}{4}\Big(k^2-(k\cdOt\xI)^2\biG)\BiG((k\cDoT \zeta)^2-\zeta^2\Big(k^2-(k\cdoT\xI)^2\bIg)\biG) \noTag \\
&\siM \Left\{\begiN{aRraY}{lCl}
\mAthcaL{e}^2|\mathbF{k}|^2(k_{\paRallEl}^2+|\MaTHbf{K}|^2) & \text{foR} & K_{\
 only holds if the prefact or $\varep silon ^0$  is  n ot z ero.  Otherwise, we runinto a “$0/0$” situati on, w hi c h is ma thema tically no t def in ed . N ow ,  t he ph ysi cal pha se space o f t he  process con t ai ns a secto r,for which $| k_{ \paral le l}| $  beco mes  arbi traril y  small . This se ct o r is c h aracter i z ed  bytwo angles $(\var p hi _ 0,\vartheta_0) $, whe re fo r $\v arp hi_0=0$, $ \v arthe t a_0\app r ox 2 . 35$ .  This is depi cted in Fig .  \[ fig:ze ro -co n tour\] .

![ Co n tou r of angles  $(\ varphi_0, \varth e ta_0)$, for whi ch the  no rma liza t io nfac to r  $N ' '$  va n ish es. Thepe ak s inFig. \ [ f ig:p lot s-ma trix- element-squar e-p aram e ter -choi ce-3\ ], l ie  on t his co ntour .[ ]{data-label="f ig:z ero-conto ur" }] (co ns isten c y-modm ax- par ity-odd _v1_fig 6 _co nt o u r -z eros.pdf)

For thi ss p ec ial case  the n o rm al i zation f ac tor  $N' ' $  and,  the r ef ore, the  prefa c to r$\varep si lon^0$  c anbec ome a r bitr arilysmall. T his d e stroys the app l icability oft he W ar d  ide nti ty and show s up as p eaks in  $X _ {22}$  of F ig s .\ [fig:plots-matrix-e le ment-s quare -parameter-ch oice-2\] a n d \[fig:pl ots- m at r ix-element-squ are-p arameter-c h oice-3\] .

No w we wou ld like t o analytic all y i nve sti g a te  the limit $\ m a thca l{ E}\maps to0$ of t hesec ond  po la rizationvector,wi th  i ts  tr ansve r sal part  s ubt ra cte d. We distin guish  bet we en two  cases, $k _ { \par al le l}\s im\m athca l{E} k _{\ bot}$ a nd $k_{\p ara l lel} \g g\mathca l{E}k_{\bot}$ .The firstre pre sentst h e phasespace sector for Compto n  scatte rin g, fo r wh ich $k_{\ par allel} $ b e comesarbitr arily  s mal l .  We b e g in  wi th  the zerot h com ponen tof E q. : $$ \begin{aligned}
\s q rt{ N''}\,\vareps ilo n^{0 } & =\ fra c {1 } {4} \b i g(k ^ 2 -(k\cdot\xi)^2\ big)\Big(( k\ c do t \zeta)^2 - \ze ta ^2\big( k^2-(k\ cdot\ x i)^2\bi g)\Big) \ notag \\&\ sim\ l eft \{\begin{a rray}{lc l}
\mathc a l{E}^ 2 |\ mathb f{k }|^2(k _{ \pa ralle l}^2+| \ mat hbf{k }|^2)&\text{ for}&k_{\
 only_holds if_the prefactor $\varepsilon^0$ is_not zero._Otherwise,_we run_into_a “$0/0$” situation,_which is mathematically_not defined. Now, the_physical phase space_of_the process contains a sector, for which $|k_{\parallel}|$ becomes arbitrarily small. This sector is_characterized_by two_angles_$(\varphi_0,\vartheta_0)$,_where for $\varphi_0=0$, $\vartheta_0\approx 2.35$._This is depicted in Fig._\[fig:zero-contour\].

![Contour of_angles $(\varphi_0,\vartheta_0)$, for which the normalization factor $N''$_vanishes._The peaks in_Fig. \[fig:plots-matrix-element-square-parameter-choice-3\], lie on this contour.[]{data-label="fig:zero-contour"}](consistency-modmax-parity-odd_v1_fig6_contour-zeros.pdf)

For this special case_the normalization factor $N''$ and, therefore,_the prefactor $\varepsilon^0$_can_become_arbitrarily small. This destroys_the applicability of the Ward identity_and shows up as peaks in_$X_{22}$ of Figs. \[fig:plots-matrix-element-square-parameter-choice-2\] and \[fig:plots-matrix-element-square-parameter-choice-3\].

Now we_would like to analytically investigate the_limit $\mathcal{E}\mapsto 0$ of the_second polarization_vector, with its transversal part_subtracted. We distinguish_between two_cases, $k_{\parallel}\sim \mathcal{E}k_{\bot}$_and $k_{\parallel}\gg \mathcal{E}k_{\bot}$. The first represents_the phase space_sector for Compton scattering, for which_$k_{\parallel}$_becomes arbitrarily small._We_begin_with the_zeroth component of_Eq._: $$\begin{aligned}
\sqrt{N''}\,\varepsilon^{0}&=\frac{1}{4}\big(k^2-(k\cdot\xi)^2\big)\Big((k\cdot_\zeta)^2-\zeta^2\big(k^2-(k\cdot\xi)^2\big)\Big)_\notag \\
&\sim \left\{\begin{array}{lcl}
\mathcal{E}^2|\mathbf{k}|^2(k_{\parallel}^2+|\mathbf{k}|^2) & \text{for} &_k_{\