 a solitary WR star. Our criteria are based on (a) the number of nearby massive stars (other than the WR star), and (b) a comparison of the sizes of the Group I shells with the sizes of WR nebulae in the LMC.

In Figure 4 we plot the sizes of Group I shells versus the number of nearby, potentially ionizing stars (including the WR star in all cases). Stars were selected if they were both (a) within one shell radius (and therefore within the boundary of the shell or shell fragment), and (b) have B - V colors $\leq$ 0 (photometry is taken from Magnier et al. (1992)). Only stars bluer than B0 (B - V = -0.3) can supply enough ionizing photons to be consistent with the H$\alpha$ luminosities of Group I shells. Our choice of B - V $\leq$ 0 was prompted by considering the following two factors. First, there are substantial uncertainties in the photometry from the Magnier catalog. Second, we have made no reddening corrections. Thus the color information on stars in the field is, unfortunately, crude. Note in Figure 4 that Group I shells with radii less than $\sim$40 pc generally contain one or two ionizing stars.

Rosado (1986) reported the radii of shells associated with (a) single WR stars, (b) single OB stars, and (c) multiple OB & WR stars in the LMC. The mean radii are, respectively, 15$\pm$7 pc, 27$\pm$4 pc, and 69$\pm$33 pc (Rosado 1986). Single massive stars in the LMC are surrounded by shells up to $\sim$30 pc in radius, consistent with the radius estimated above for Group I shells

We suggest, allowing for chance alignment, those shells containing one or two ionizing stars (including a WR star), or that are $\leq$ 40 pc in radius, are possibly of E- or W-type. There are 5 Group Ia shells that satisfy this criteria: ob69-F1, MS8, MS2, ob54wr1, and ob42wr1. All 7 inner Group Ib shells satisfy this criteria, although the outer shells for MS14 and MS4 do not. Therefore, 12 of the 48 WR stars we observe (25$\%$) may be surrounded by “classical” WR E- or W-type shells. The remaining 11 Group Ia shells contain three or
a solitary WR star. Our criteria are based on (a) the numeral of nearby massive star (other than the WR star), and (b) a comparison of the sizes of the Group I blast with the sizes of WR nebulae in the LMC. 

 In number 4 we plat the sizes of Group I blast versus the number of nearby, potentially ionizing stars (admit the WR star in all cases). headliner were choose if they were both (a) within one shell spoke (and therefore within the limit of the plate or shell fragment), and (b) have b-complex vitamin - V colors $ \leq$ 0 (photometry is take from Magnier et al. (1992) ). entirely stars blasphemous than B0 (B - V = -0.3) can supply adequate ionizing photons to be consistent with the H$\alpha$ luminosities of Group I shells. Our choice of B - five $ \leq$ 0 was prompted by considering the following two factors. First, there are substantial uncertainties in the photometry from the Magnier catalog. Second, we have made no reddening correction. Thus the color data on star in the sphere is, unfortunately, crude. Note in Figure 4 that Group I shells with radii less than $ \sim$40 pc generally control one or two ionizing stars. 

 Rosado (1986) reported the radii of shells associated with (a) single WR headliner, (b) single OB stars, and (c) multiple OB & WR asterisk in the LMC. The mean spoke are, respectively, 15$\pm$7 pc, 27$\pm$4 pc, and 69$\pm$33 pc (Rosado 1986). Single massive stars in the LMC are besiege by shells up to $ \sim$30 pc in radius, reproducible with the radius estimated above for Group I shells 

 We suggest, allow for chance alignment, those shells containing one or two ionizing stars (include a WR star), or that are $ \leq$ 40 personal computer in radius, are possibly of E- or W - type. There be 5 Group Ia shells that satisfy this criterion: ob69 - F1, MS8, MS2, ob54wr1, and ob42wr1. All 7 inner Group Ib shell satisfy this criteria, although the outer shells for MS14 and MS4 do not. Therefore, 12 of the 48 WR stars we observe (25$\%$) may be surround by “ classical ” WR E- or W - character shells. The remaining 11 Group Ia shells contain three or
 a dolitary WR star. Our criueria are based ou (a) the numbed of neafby massive stars (other than tye WR star), and (b) a comparisun of the sizes od tht Group I shells xjth the sizes lf WX iebulae in the KMC.

In Figuse 4 we plot tha rives of Group I shells versus the numfer of mewrby, potentialjy ipgizihg stars (including the WR star in zll casts). Stars were selevted if they were both (a) wlthij one shell radius (and therefire ruthin the bojndary of uhz shell or ahell fragment), and (b) have B - V zolorx $\leq$ 0 (phojojehty is taken hrom Mwgnier et al. (1992)). Only sdars blier than B0 (B - Y = -0.3) cen sypply enough ionizing photons to be confistent whtk the H$\alpha$ luminosiriws of Grogp I wheuls. Onr dhoice of B - V $\leq$ 0 was promptwd by considering tne dollowing two factows. First, there are substantial uncertaintpes jn the photometry from rhe Magnier catalog. Sgcond, we hwve made no reddening corrections. Thus the color hnforjxtiin ub dtars in the field is, unfortunately, crude. Notq im Nigure 4 that Gromp I shells with rsdli jess than $\sim$40 pc geusrzlly contain one og two ijnizibg stars.

Rjsadp (1986) reported the radii of shwlls associaned qith (a) single WR scars, (b) singlz OB sjars, amd (c) multiple OB & WR stcrs in the LMC. Thf mean raski are, respectivdly, 15$\pk$7 pc, 27$\pm$4 kz, and 69$\pm$33 pc (Rosadj 1986). Single masxive stxrs on the LMC are skrroukged by shells up tl $\sim$30 pw in radiud, consistent with the radius esvmmated above gos Ggoup I shzlls

We suggest, alloring for chancg alignmeut, thore shells bontaininj one or two ionizing stasd (including e WR star), or rhat are $\led$ 40 pc in radius, are posspbjy od E- or W-type. There arg 5 Group Ia shellw tyat satisfy thix cfitqrpa: pb69-S1, MS8, MS2, ob54wr1, dnd ub42wf1. All 7 inner Groui Ic shrlls satisfy this crhterja, although the ouyev shells dor MS14 agd MS4 do not. Yherefore, 12 of the 48 WR svars wx obsetve (25$\%$) may be surrounded by “classiczl” WR E- og W-bype shells. Tre rcmaiging 11 Grou' Ia shells contain three or
a solitary WR star. Our criteria are (a) number of massive stars (other (b) comparison of the of the Group shells with the sizes of WR in the LMC. In Figure 4 we plot the sizes of Group I versus the number of nearby, potentially ionizing stars (including the WR star in cases). were if were both (a) within one shell radius (and therefore within the boundary of the shell or fragment), and (b) have B - V colors 0 (photometry is taken Magnier et al. (1992)). Only bluer B0 (B V -0.3) supply enough ionizing to be consistent with the H$\alpha$ luminosities of Group I shells. Our choice of B - V 0 was considering the two First, are substantial uncertainties photometry from the Magnier catalog. Second, no reddening corrections. Thus the color information on in the is, unfortunately, crude. Note in Figure that Group I shells with radii less than pc generally contain one or two ionizing stars. Rosado (1986) reported the radii of shells (a) single WR stars, single OB stars, (c) OB WR in the The mean radii are, respectively, 15$\pm$7 pc, 27$\pm$4 pc, and 69$\pm$33 (Rosado 1986). Single massive stars in the LMC are surrounded up $\sim$30 pc in consistent with the radius above Group I shells We for alignment, one two stars (including a WR or that are $\leq$ 40 in radius, are possibly are 5 Group Ia shells that satisfy this ob69-F1, MS8, MS2, ob54wr1, and ob42wr1. All inner Group Ib shells satisfy this criteria, although the outer shells for and MS4 Therefore, 12 of the 48 WR stars we (25$\%$) may be surrounded “classical” WR E- or W-type shells. The remaining 11 Ia contain three
 a solitary WR star. Our criteriA are based oN (a) the NumBer Of NearBy maSsive stars (otheR Than The WR star), and (b) a comparisOn of tHe SIzes OF tHe GroUp I shelLS wITH thE sIzEs oF Wr NeBulae In tHe LMC.

In figure 4 we plOt tHe Sizes of Group i ShElls versus The Number of nearBy, pOtentiAlLy iONizinG stArs (inCludinG The WR sTar in all cAsES). Stars WEre seleCTEd If thEy were both (a) within ONe SHell radius (and tHerefoRe WItHIN thE boUndary of thE sHell oR Shell frAGmENT), And (B) Have B - V colors $\lEq$ 0 (photometrY Is tAken frOm magNIer et aL. (1992)). Only StARs bLuer than B0 (B - V = -0.3) Can sUpply enouGh ioniZIng photONs to be cOnsistEnt WitH the h$\AlPhA$ luMiNOsiTIeS of gRouP I shells. ouR cHoice Of B - V $\LEQ$ 0 WAs prOmpTed bY consIdering the folLowIng tWO faCtors. first, TherE aRe subStantiAl uncErTainties in the phOtomEtry from tHe MAgNieR cAtaloG. second, We hAve Made no rEddeninG CorReCTIOnS. Thus the color inforMaTIOn On stars iN the fiELd Is, UNfortunaTeLy, cRude. nOTe in FIgurE 4 ThAt Group I Shells WItH rAdii lesS tHan $\sim$40 Pc GenEraLly coNTain One or tWo ioniziNg staRS.

Rosado (1986) reporteD The radii of sheLLs ASSoCIateD wiTh (a) single WR StarS, (B) sinGle Ob StArs, ANd (c) muLtiplE Ob & wR STars in the LMC. The mean RaDii are, RespeCtively, 15$\pm$7 pc, 27$\pm$4 Pc, and 69$\pm$33 pc (ROSADo 1986). Single MassIVe STars in the LMC arE surrOunded by shELls up to $\sIm$30 pc iN radius, cOnsistent WITh the radIus EstImaTed ABOvE for Group I sheLLS

We sUgGest, allOwiNg for chAncE alIgnMenT, tHose shellS containInG oNe Or Two IonizINg stars (iNcLudInG a Wr star), OR that aRe $\leq$ 40 Pc in RaDiUS, arE possibLY oF e- Or W-tYpE. THere Are 5 grOup Ia ShelLS thAt satisFy this criTerIA: ob69-F1, mS8, mS2, Ob54wr1, and Ob42wr1. All 7 inner GRoUp Ib shells SaTisFy this CRIteria, alThough the outer shells for ms14 and MS4 dO noT. TherEforE, 12 of the 48 WR sTarS we obsErvE (25$\%$) May be sUrrounDed by “ClAssICAl” WR E- OR w-tYpe ShElls. The remAINinG 11 GrouP IA sheLls contAin three or
 a solitary WR star. Our c riteria ar e bas edon(a ) th e nu mber of nearby mass ive stars (other thanthe W Rs tar) ,  a nd (b ) a com p ar i s onof  t hesi z es  of t heGroup I  shells wi thth e sizes of W R  n ebulae inthe  LMC.

In Fi gur e 4 we  p lot the s ize s ofGroupI  shell s versusth e  numbe r  of nea r b y,  pot entially ionizing st a rs (includingthe WR  s t ar i n a llcases). St ar s wer e  select e di f the y  were both (a ) within on e  sh ell ra di us( and th erefo re wit hin the bou ndar y of theshello r shell fragmen t), an d ( b)have B-V c ol o rs$ \l eq$ 0 ( photomet ry  i s tak en f r o m Magn ier  etal. ( 1992)). Onlysta rs b l uer  than  B0 ( B -V= -0. 3) can  supp ly  enough ionizin g ph otons tobeco nsi st ent w i th the  H$ \al pha$ lu minosit i esof G r ou p I shells. Our ch oi c e  o f B - V$\leq$ 0wa s  prompte dbycons i d ering  the fo llowingtwo fa c to rs . First ,therear e s ubs tanti a l un certai nties in  thep hotometry from the Magnier c a ta l o g. Seco nd,  we have ma de n o  red deni n gcor r ectio ns. T hu s  t h e color information  o n star s inthe field is,  unfortuna t e l y, crude . No t ei n Figure 4 tha t Gro up I shell s  with ra dii l ess than  $\sim$40 p c genera lly  co nta ino n eor two ionizi n g  sta rs .

Rosa do(1986)rep ort edthe  r adii of s hells as so ci at ed  wi th (a )  singleWR  st ar s,(b) s i ngle O B sta rs,an d( c)multipl e  O B & WR  s ta rs i n t he  LMC.  The mea n radii  are, res pec t ivel y,  1 5$\pm$7  pc, 27$\pm$4  p c, and 69$ \p m$3 3 pc ( R o sado 198 6). Single massive star s  in the  LM C are  sur rounded b y s hellsupt o $\si m$30 p c inra diu s ,  cons i s te ntwi th the rad i u s e stima te d ab ove for  Group I shells

W e  su ggest, allowi ngforc h an cea li g nme nt ,  th o s e shells contai ning one o rt wo  ionizings tar s(includ ing a W R sta r ), or t hat are $ \leq$ 40pc  inr a diu s, are pos sibly of  E- or W- t ype.T he re ar e 5  Group  I a s hells  thats ati sfy t his cr it eria:ob69- F1 , MS8, M S2, ob54wr1, and ob42wr 1. All  7 in ner  Group Ib  sh e lls  satisfythis  criteria,  al tho ugh t heo utershel l sfor MS14andM S4 do not .  T her e f or e, 12 of th e 4 8 W R sta rsw e obse rve(25$\%$) may be s u rrounded by “c lass i c al”  WR E- o rW-type shells.  Th er e maining11  Group Ia s hells co nt a in th ree or 
 a_solitary WR_star. Our criteria are_based on_(a)_the number_of_nearby massive stars_(other than the_WR star), and (b)_a comparison of_the_sizes of the Group I shells with the sizes of WR nebulae in the_LMC.

In_Figure 4_we_plot_the sizes of Group I_shells versus the number of_nearby, potentially_ionizing stars (including the WR star in all_cases)._Stars were selected_if they were both (a) within one shell radius_(and therefore within the boundary of_the shell or_shell_fragment),_and (b) have B_- V colors $\leq$ 0 (photometry_is taken from Magnier et al._(1992)). Only stars bluer than B0 (B_- V = -0.3) can supply_enough ionizing photons to be_consistent with_the H$\alpha$ luminosities of Group_I shells. Our_choice of_B - V_$\leq$ 0 was prompted by considering_the following two_factors. First, there are substantial uncertainties_in_the photometry from_the_Magnier_catalog. Second,_we have made_no_reddening corrections._Thus_the color information on stars in_the_field is, unfortunately, crude. Note in Figure_4 that Group I_shells_with radii less than_$\sim$40 pc generally contain one_or two ionizing stars.

Rosado (1986) reported_the radii_of shells_associated with (a) single WR stars, (b) single OB stars, and_(c) multiple OB & WR stars_in the LMC. The_mean radii_are,_respectively, 15$\pm$7 pc,_27$\pm$4_pc, and_69$\pm$33 pc (Rosado 1986). Single massive stars_in the_LMC are surrounded by shells up_to $\sim$30 pc in_radius,_consistent with the radius estimated above_for Group I shells

We suggest, allowing_for chance alignment, those shells_containing_one_or two ionizing stars (including_a WR star), or that are_$\leq$ 40 pc_in radius, are possibly of E- or_W-type._There are 5 Group Ia shells_that_satisfy this criteria: ob69-F1, MS8, MS2,_ob54wr1,_and_ob42wr1. All 7 inner Group_Ib shells satisfy this criteria, although_the outer shells for MS14 and MS4 do not._Therefore, 12 of_the 48 WR stars we_observe_(25$\%$)_may be surrounded by “classical” WR E- or W-type shells._The remaining_11 Group Ia_shells contain three or