R}^p \rightarrow \mathbf{R}$ such that for all $i \in N$, $$\begin{aligned}
        \mathbf{E}[Y_{i,1}|\overline Y_{i,0},Y_{i,0},X,G] = g_1(\overline Y_{i,0},Y_{i,0},X_i),
    \end{aligned}$$ where $$\begin{aligned}
    \label{Y bar}
    \overline Y_{i,0} = \frac{1}{|N(i)|}\sum_{j \in N(i)} Y_{j,0}.
    \end{aligned}$$

The assumption says that the conditional expectation of $Y_{i,1}$ given $\overline Y_{i,0}, Y_{i,0},X,G$ depend on $G$ only through $\overline Y_{i,0}$. This is an index-sufficiency condition. As $G$ involves the entire sample, it appears that one needs such a condition to consistently estimate the conditional expectation function for each $Y_{i,1} \in N$. Depending on applications, one may adopt a different form of index sufficiency, for example, by replacing $\overline Y_{i,0}$ by a weighted local average of $Y_{i,0}$’s with weights potentially depending on the covariates.

Let $\hat g_0$ and $\hat g_1$ be estimators of $g_0$ and $g_1$. We take $\hat \mu_{j,0} = \hat g_0(X_j)$. As for $\mu_{i,1}$, we first generate $U_{j,r}, r=1,...,R$, as i.i.d. draws from the uniform distribution on $[0,1]$, and construct $Y_{j,0,r} = 1\{\hat \mu_{j,0} \ge U_{j,r}\}$. We obtain $$\begin{aligned}
\label{mu hat}
    \hat \mu_{i,1} = \frac{1}{R}\sum_{r=1}^R \hat g_1(\overline Y_{i,0,r},Y_{i,0},X_i),\end{aligned}$$ where $$\begin{aligned}
   \overline Y_{i,0,r} = \frac{1}{|N(i)|}\
R}^p \rightarrow \mathbf{R}$ such that for all $ i \in N$, $ $ \begin{aligned } 
         \mathbf{E}[Y_{i,1}|\overline Y_{i,0},Y_{i,0},X, G ] = g_1(\overline Y_{i,0},Y_{i,0},X_i), 
     \end{aligned}$$ where $ $ \begin{aligned } 
     \label{Y bar } 
     \overline Y_{i,0 } = \frac{1}{|N(i)|}\sum_{j \in N(i) } Y_{j,0 }. 
     \end{aligned}$$ 

 The assumption says that the conditional expectation of $ Y_{i,1}$ give $ \overline Y_{i,0 }, Y_{i,0},X, G$ count on $ G$ only through $ \overline Y_{i,0}$. This is an index - enough condition. As $ G$ necessitate the entire sample distribution, it appears that one needs such a condition to systematically calculate the conditional expectation function for each $ Y_{i,1 } \in N$. count on applications, one may adopt a different mannequin of index sufficiency, for example, by replacing $ \overline Y_{i,0}$ by a weighted local average of $ Y_{i,0}$ ’s with weight potentially depending on the covariates. 

 Let $ \hat g_0 $ and $ \hat g_1 $ be estimators of $ g_0 $ and $ g_1$. We claim $ \hat \mu_{j,0 } = \hat g_0(X_j)$. As for $ \mu_{i,1}$, we first generate $ U_{j, r }, r=1,... ,R$, as i.i.d. draws from the consistent distribution on $ [ 0,1]$, and construct $ Y_{j,0,r } = 1\{\hat \mu_{j,0 } \ge U_{j, r}\}$. We obtain $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 \label{mu hat } 
     \hat \mu_{i,1 } = \frac{1}{R}\sum_{r=1}^R \hat g_1(\overline Y_{i,0,r},Y_{i,0},X_i),\end{aligned}$$ where $ $ \begin{aligned } 
    \overline Y_{i,0,r } = \frac{1}{|N(i)|}\
R}^p \gightarrow \mathbf{R}$ such uhat for all $i \in N$, $$\begii{alignes}
        \mathbf{E}[Y_{i,1}|\overline Y_{i,0},Y_{i,0},X,G] = g_1(\lvwrlint Y_{i,0},Y_{i,0},X_i),
    \end{aligved}$$ where $$\begin{alugnev}
    \label{Y bar}
    \overllue Y_{i,0} = \frae{1}{|N(m)|}\sum_{j \in N(i)} Y_{j,0}.
    \end{aligted}$$

The assumpthov days that the conditional expectatijn of $Y_{o,1}$ hiven $\overline Y_{i,0}, J_{i,0},V,G$ dsiekd on $G$ only through $\overline Y_{i,0}$. This iv an index-sufgiciency condition. As $G$ ingolvfs the entire samppe, it appeata trqt one needs such a condition to cknsistently estimate the conditkonal expectatiin fujwtion for eech $Y_{i,1} \in N$. Dependlmg on dpplicayions, one may sdo't a different form of invex sufficiency, for gxample, by rzplacing $\overline Y_{i,0}$ vy a wehghtad luxal avtraje kf $Y_{i,0}$’s wivh weights lotentially depending on the cpvwgoates.

Let $\hat g_0$ and $\hwt g_1$ be estimators of $g_0$ and $g_1$. We take $\hdt \ju_{j,0} = \hat g_0(X_j)$. As for $\mu_{i,1}$, we first generate $U_{j,t}, r=1,...,R$, as i.i.q. draws from the uniform distribution on $[0,1]$, and convtrucv $H_{j,0,r} = 1\{\mat \oy_{j,0} \ge U_{j,r}\}$. We obtain $$\begin{aligned}
\label{mu hat}
    \rzt \ml_{i,1} = \frac{1}{R}\sum_{r=1}^R \hab g_1(\overline Y_{i,0,r},Y_{i,0},X_o),\ejd{sjigned}$$ where $$\cegin{alighed}
   \overline Y_{i,0,r} = \frac{1}{|N(y)|}\
R}^p \rightarrow \mathbf{R}$ such that for all N$, \mathbf{E}[Y_{i,1}|\overline Y_{i,0},Y_{i,0},X,G] g_1(\overline Y_{i,0},Y_{i,0},X_i), \end{aligned}$$ Y_{i,0} \frac{1}{|N(i)|}\sum_{j \in N(i)} \end{aligned}$$ The assumption that the conditional expectation of $Y_{i,1}$ $\overline Y_{i,0}, Y_{i,0},X,G$ depend on $G$ only through $\overline Y_{i,0}$. This is an condition. As $G$ involves the entire sample, it appears that one needs such condition consistently the expectation function for each $Y_{i,1} \in N$. Depending on applications, one may adopt a different form index sufficiency, for example, by replacing $\overline Y_{i,0}$ a weighted local average $Y_{i,0}$’s with weights potentially depending the Let $\hat and g_1$ estimators of $g_0$ $g_1$. We take $\hat \mu_{j,0} = \hat g_0(X_j)$. As for $\mu_{i,1}$, we first generate $U_{j,r}, r=1,...,R$, as draws from distribution on and $Y_{j,0,r} 1\{\hat \mu_{j,0} \ge obtain $$\begin{aligned} \label{mu hat} \hat \mu_{i,1} g_1(\overline Y_{i,0,r},Y_{i,0},X_i),\end{aligned}$$ where $$\begin{aligned} \overline Y_{i,0,r} = \frac{1}{|N(i)|}\
R}^p \rightarrow \mathbf{R}$ such thAt for all $i \iN N$, $$\begIn{aLigNeD}
        \matHbf{E}[y_{i,1}|\overline Y_{i,0},Y_{i,0},x,g] = g_1(\ovErline Y_{i,0},Y_{i,0},X_i),
    \end{aligned}$$ Where $$\BeGIn{alIGnEd}
    \labEl{Y bar}
    \oVErLINe Y_{I,0} = \fRaC{1}{|N(i)|}\SuM_{J \iN N(i)} Y_{j,0}.
    \End{Aligned}$$

the assumptIon SaYs that the conDItIonal expecTatIon of $Y_{i,1}$ given $\OveRline Y_{I,0}, Y_{I,0},X,G$ DEpend On $G$ Only tHrough $\OVerlinE Y_{i,0}$. This is An INdex-suFFiciencY COnDitiOn. As $G$ involves the eNTiRE sample, it appeaRs that OnE NeEDS suCh a Condition tO cOnsisTEntly esTImATE The COnditional expEctation funCTioN for eaCh $y_{i,1} \iN n$. DepenDing oN aPPliCations, one mAy adOpt a diffeRent foRM of indeX SufficiEncy, foR exAmpLe, by REpLaCinG $\oVErlINe y_{i,0}$ bY A weIghted loCaL aVeragE of $Y_{I,0}$’S WITh weIghTs poTentiAlly depending On tHe coVAriAtes.

LEt $\hat G_0$ and $\HaT g_1$ be eStimatOrs of $G_0$ aNd $g_1$. We take $\hat \mu_{j,0} = \Hat g_0(x_j)$. As for $\mu_{I,1}$, we FiRst GeNeratE $u_{j,r}, r=1,...,R$, aS i.i.D. drAws from The unifORm dIsTRIBuTion on $[0,1]$, and construct $y_{j,0,R} = 1\{\HAt \Mu_{j,0} \ge U_{j,r}\}$. we obtaIN $$\bEgIN{aligned}
\LaBel{Mu haT}
    \HAt \mu_{i,1} = \Frac{1}{r}\SuM_{r=1}^R \hat g_1(\oVerlinE y_{i,0,R},Y_{I,0},X_i),\end{aLiGned}$$ whErE $$\beGin{AlignED}
   \oveRline Y_{I,0,r} = \frac{1}{|N(i)|}\
R}^p \rightarrow \mathbf{R }$ such th at fo r a ll$i  \in  N$,  $$\begin{alig n ed}        \mathbf{E}[Y_{ i,1}| \o v erli n eY_{i, 0},Y_{i , 0} , X ,G]  =  g _1( \o v er lineY_{ i,0},Y_ {i,0},X_i) ,
  \end{aligne d }$ $ where $$ \be gin{aligned} 
   \lab el {Yb ar}
  \over line Y _ {i,0}= \frac{1 }{ | N(i)|} \ sum_{j\ i nN(i) } Y_{j,0}.
    \e n d{ a ligned}$$

The  assum pt i on s ays  th at the con di tiona l  expect a ti o n of$ Y_{i,1}$ give n $\overlin e  Y_ {i,0},  Y _{i , 0},X,G $ dep en d  on  $G$ only t hrou gh $\over line Y _ {i,0}$. This is  an in dex -su ffic i en cy  co nd i tio n .As$ G$involves  t he  enti re s a m p l e, i t a ppea rs th at one needssuc h ac ond ition  to c onsi st ently  estim ate t he  conditional ex pect ation fun cti on  fo reach$ Y_{i,1 } \ inN$. Dep endingo n a pp l i c at ions, one may adop ta di fferentform o f  i nd e x suffic ie ncy , fo r examp le,b yreplacin g $\ov e rl in e Y_{i, 0} $ by a  w eig hte d loc a l av erageof $Y_{i ,0}$’ s  with weightsp otentially de p en d i ng on t hecovariates. 

Le t  $\h at g _ 0$  an d  $\ha t g_1 $b ee stimators of $g_0$an d $g_1 $. We  take $\hat \ mu_{j,0} = \ h at g_0(X _j)$ .  A s  for $\mu_{i,1 }$, w e first ge n erate $U _{j,r }, r=1,. ..,R$, as i .i.d. dr aws  fr omthe u ni form distribu t i on o n$[0,1]$ , a nd cons tru ct$Y_ {j, 0, r} = 1\{\ hat \mu_ {j ,0 }\g e U _{j,r } \}$. Weob tai n$$\ begin { aligne d}
\l abel {m uh at} 
    \h a t\ m u_{i ,1 }= \f rac {1 }{R}\ sum_ { r=1 }^R \ha t g_1(\ov erl i ne Y _{ i, 0,r},Y_ {i,0},X_i),\e nd {aligned}$ $whe re $$\ b e gin{alig ned}
   \overline Y_{i, 0 ,r} = \ fra c{1}{ |N(i )|}\
R}^p \rightarrow_\mathbf{R}$ such_that for all $i_\in N$,_$$\begin{aligned}
_ __  _ \mathbf{E}[Y_{i,1}|\overline Y_{i,0},Y_{i,0},X,G]_= g_1(\overline Y_{i,0},Y_{i,0},X_i),
 _  \end{aligned}$$_where_$$\begin{aligned}
    \label{Y bar}
    \overline Y_{i,0} = \frac{1}{|N(i)|}\sum_{j \in_N(i)}_Y_{j,0}.
 ___\end{aligned}$$

The assumption says that the_conditional expectation of $Y_{i,1}$ given_$\overline Y_{i,0},_Y_{i,0},X,G$ depend on $G$ only through $\overline Y_{i,0}$._This_is an index-sufficiency_condition. As $G$ involves the entire sample, it appears_that one needs such a condition_to consistently estimate_the_conditional_expectation function for each_$Y_{i,1} \in N$. Depending on applications,_one may adopt a different form_of index sufficiency, for example, by replacing_$\overline Y_{i,0}$ by a weighted local_average of $Y_{i,0}$’s with weights_potentially depending_on the covariates.

Let $\hat g_0$_and $\hat g_1$_be estimators_of $g_0$ and_$g_1$. We take $\hat \mu_{j,0} =_\hat g_0(X_j)$. As_for $\mu_{i,1}$, we first generate $U_{j,r},_r=1,...,R$,_as i.i.d. draws_from_the_uniform distribution_on $[0,1]$, and_construct_$Y_{j,0,r} =_1\{\hat_\mu_{j,0} \ge U_{j,r}\}$. We obtain $$\begin{aligned}
\label{mu_hat}
_   \hat \mu_{i,1} = \frac{1}{R}\sum_{r=1}^R_\hat g_1(\overline Y_{i,0,r},Y_{i,0},X_i),\end{aligned}$$ where_$$\begin{aligned}
_  \overline Y_{i,0,r}_= \frac{1}{|N(i)|}\