_{kl}/(ns_{kk}s_{ll})$.]{}

For ease of notation, let $Z_1,\cdots,Z_p$ be the standardized random variables of $\widehat{\beta}_1,\cdots,\widehat{\beta}_p$, that is, $$\label{b2}
Z_i=\frac{\widehat{\beta}_i}{{\mbox{SD}}(\widehat{\beta}_i)}=\frac{\widehat{\beta}_i}{\sigma/(\sqrt{n}s_{ii})}, \quad\quad i=1,\cdots,p.$$ In the above, we implicitly assume that $\sigma$ is known and the above standardized random variables are z-test statistics. The estimate of residual variance $\sigma^2$ will be discussed in Section 6 via refitted cross-validation (Fan, Guo & Hao, 2011). Then, conditioning on $\{X_j^i\}$, $$\label{c1}
(Z_1,\cdots,Z_p)^T\sim N((\mu_1,\cdots,\mu_p)^T,{\mbox{\boldmath $\Sigma$}}),$$ where $\mu_i=\sqrt{n}\beta_is_{ii}/\sigma$ and covariance matrix ${\mbox{\boldmath $\Sigma$}}$ has the $(k,l)$th element as $s_{kl}$. Simultaneously testing (2) based on $(\widehat{\beta}_1,\cdots,\widehat{\beta}_p)^T$ is thus equivalent to testing

$$\label{c2}
H_{0j}:\quad\mu_j=0\quad\text{vs}\quad H_{1j}:\quad \mu_j\neq0, \quad\quad j=1,\cdots,p$$

based on $(Z_1,\cdots,Z_p)^T$.

In (4), ${\mbox{\boldmath $\Sigma$}}$ is the population covariance matrix of $(Z_1,\cdots,Z_p)^T$, and is known based on the sample data $\{X_j^i\}$. The covariance matrix ${\mbox{\boldmath $\Sigma$}}$ can have arbitrary dependence structure. We would like to clarify that ${\mbox{\boldmath $\Sigma$}}$ is known and there is no estimation of the covariance matrix of $X_1,\cdots,X_p$ in this set up.

Estimating False Discovery Proportion
=====================================

From now on assume that among all the $p$ null hypotheses,
_ { kl}/(ns_{kk}s_{ll})$. ] { } 

 For ease of notation, let $ Z_1,\cdots, Z_p$ be the standardized random variable star of $ \widehat{\beta}_1,\cdots,\widehat{\beta}_p$, that is, $ $ \label{b2 } 
 Z_i=\frac{\widehat{\beta}_i}{{\mbox{SD}}(\widehat{\beta}_i)}=\frac{\widehat{\beta}_i}{\sigma/(\sqrt{n}s_{ii }) }, \quad\quad i=1,\cdots, p.$$ In the above, we implicitly wear that $ \sigma$ is known and the above standardized random variables are omega - test statistics. The estimate of residual variation $ \sigma^2 $ will be discussed in Section 6 via refit crabbed - validation (Fan, Guo & Hao, 2011). Then, conditioning on $ \{X_j^i\}$, $ $ \label{c1 } 
 (Z_1,\cdots, Z_p)^T\sim N((\mu_1,\cdots,\mu_p)^T,{\mbox{\boldmath $ \Sigma$}}),$$ where $ \mu_i=\sqrt{n}\beta_is_{ii}/\sigma$ and covariance matrix $ { \mbox{\boldmath $ \Sigma$}}$ suffer the $ (k, l)$th element as $ s_{kl}$. Simultaneously examination (2) based on $ (\widehat{\beta}_1,\cdots,\widehat{\beta}_p)^T$ is thus equivalent to testing 

 $ $ \label{c2 } 
 H_{0j}:\quad\mu_j=0\quad\text{vs}\quad H_{1j}:\quad \mu_j\neq0, \quad\quad j=1,\cdots, p$$ 

 based on $ (Z_1,\cdots, Z_p)^T$. 

 In (4), $ { \mbox{\boldmath $ \Sigma$}}$ is the population covariance matrix of $ (Z_1,\cdots, Z_p)^T$, and is known based on the sample datum $ \{X_j^i\}$. The covariance matrix $ { \mbox{\boldmath $ \Sigma$}}$ can have arbitrary dependence structure. We would wish to clarify that $ { \mbox{\boldmath $ \Sigma$}}$ is known and there is no estimation of the covariance matrix of $ X_1,\cdots, X_p$ in this set up. 

 Estimating False Discovery Proportion 
 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 

 From nowadays on assume that among all the $ p$ null hypotheses,
_{kl}/(nd_{kk}s_{ll})$.]{}

For ease of notatiun, let $Z_1,\cdots,Z_p$ be the standzrdized fandom variables of $\widehat{\bxta}_1,\ceots,\wudehat{\beta}_p$, that is, $$\lacel{b2}
Z_i=\frab{\widehat{\bwta}_i}{{\nvox{SD}}(\widehef{\beta}_i)}=\fvcc{\widsmat{\beca}_m}{\sigma/(\sqrt{n}s_{ii})}, \auad\quad i=1,\wdots,p.$$ In the dbuvz, we implicitly assume that $\sigma$ is known snf the above stwndagdyzed gakdom variables are z-test statistjcs. The estimate of tesidual variance $\sigma^2$ wipl bf discussed in Sechion 6 via rgritewd cross-valiaation (Fan, Guo & Hao, 2011). Tgen, conditioning on $\{X_j^i\}$, $$\label{c1}
(Z_1,\zdots,V_p)^T\sim N((\mu_1,\ceors,\mk_k)^T,{\mbox{\boldmavh $\Sigia$}}),$$ where $\mu_i=\sqrt{n}\betd_is_{ii}/\sibma$ and covarisncx marrix ${\mbox{\boldmath $\Sigka$}}$ has the $(k,l)$th elgment as $s_{nl}$. Simultaneously twsring (2) basad ov $(\wiaehzt{\uetz}_1,\cdots,\aidxhat{\beta}_p)^T$ js thus equuvalent to testing

$$\lsbqo{c2}
H_{0j}:\quad\mu_j=0\quzd\text{ds}\zuad H_{1j}:\quad \mu_j\neq0, \quad\quad j=1,\cdots,p$$

baseg oh $(Z_1,\cdots,Z_p)^T$.

In (4), ${\mbox{\boldnath $\Sigma$}}$ is the popolation codariance matrix of $(Z_1,\cdots,Z_p)^T$, and is known based ot the ramklc aqtw $\{X_j^i\}$. The covariance matrix ${\mbox{\boldmath $\Sigmw$}}$ csn have arbitrarn dependence strucyuge. Re would like to clcdiry that ${\mbox{\boldmahh $\Sigmw$}}$ is jnown and thete is no estimation of the xovariance mctrux of $X_1,\cdots,X_p$ in chis set up.

Ertimsting False Discovery Proporcion
=====================================

Frkm now on adsume thaf among all the $p$ nukl hypotheses,
_{kl}/(ns_{kk}s_{ll})$.]{} For ease of notation, let $Z_1,\cdots,Z_p$ standardized variables of that is, $$\label{b2} above, implicitly assume that is known and above standardized random variables are z-test The estimate of residual variance $\sigma^2$ will be discussed in Section 6 via cross-validation (Fan, Guo & Hao, 2011). Then, conditioning on $\{X_j^i\}$, $$\label{c1} (Z_1,\cdots,Z_p)^T\sim N((\mu_1,\cdots,\mu_p)^T,{\mbox{\boldmath where and matrix $\Sigma$}}$ has the $(k,l)$th element as $s_{kl}$. Simultaneously testing (2) based on $(\widehat{\beta}_1,\cdots,\widehat{\beta}_p)^T$ is thus equivalent testing $$\label{c2} H_{0j}:\quad\mu_j=0\quad\text{vs}\quad H_{1j}:\quad \mu_j\neq0, \quad\quad j=1,\cdots,p$$ based $(Z_1,\cdots,Z_p)^T$. In (4), ${\mbox{\boldmath is the population covariance matrix $(Z_1,\cdots,Z_p)^T$, is known on sample $\{X_j^i\}$. The covariance ${\mbox{\boldmath $\Sigma$}}$ can have arbitrary dependence structure. We would like to clarify that ${\mbox{\boldmath $\Sigma$}}$ is known there is of the matrix $X_1,\cdots,X_p$ this set up. Discovery Proportion ===================================== From now on all the $p$ null hypotheses,
_{kl}/(ns_{kk}s_{ll})$.]{}

For ease of notatioN, let $Z_1,\cdots,z_p$ be tHe sTanDaRdizEd raNdom variables oF $\WideHat{\beta}_1,\cdots,\widehat{\betA}_p$, thaT iS, $$\LabeL{B2}
Z_I=\frac{\Widehat{\BEtA}_I}{{\MboX{Sd}}(\wIdeHaT{\BeTa}_i)}=\frAc{\wIdehat{\bEta}_i}{\sigma/(\sQrt{N}s_{Ii})}, \quad\quad i=1,\cDOtS,p.$$ In the aboVe, wE implicitly aSsuMe that $\SiGma$ IS knowN anD the aBove stANdardiZed random VaRIables ARe z-test STAtIstiCs. The estimate of reSIdUAl variance $\sigmA^2$ will bE dIScUSSed In SEction 6 via rEfItted CRoss-valIDaTION (FaN, guo & Hao, 2011). Then, conDitioning on $\{x_J^i\}$, $$\lAbel{c1}
(Z_1,\CdOts,z_P)^T\sim N((\Mu_1,\cdoTs,\MU_p)^T,{\Mbox{\boldmatH $\SigMa$}}),$$ where $\mu_I=\sqrt{n}\BEta_is_{ii}/\SIgma$ and CovariAncE maTrix ${\MBoX{\bOldMaTH $\SiGMa$}}$ Has THe $(k,L)$th elemeNt As $S_{kl}$. SiMultANEOUsly TesTing (2) Based On $(\widehat{\beta}_1,\CdoTs,\wiDEhaT{\beta}_P)^T$ is tHus eQuIvaleNt to teSting

$$\LaBel{c2}
H_{0j}:\quad\mu_j=0\quAd\teXt{vs}\quad H_{1J}:\quAd \Mu_j\NeQ0, \quad\QUad j=1,\cdOts,P$$

baSed on $(Z_1,\cDots,Z_p)^T$.

iN (4), ${\mbOx{\BOLDmAth $\Sigma$}}$ is the populAtION cOvariancE matriX Of $(z_1,\cDOts,Z_p)^T$, anD iS knOwn bASEd on tHe saMPlE data $\{X_j^i\}$. the covARiAnCe matriX ${\mBox{\bolDmAth $\sigMa$}}$ can HAve aRbitraRy dependEnce sTRucture. We would LIke to clarify tHAt ${\MBOx{\BOldmAth $\sigma$}}$ is knowN and THere Is no EStImaTIon of The coVaRIaNCe matrix of $X_1,\cdots,X_p$ iN tHis set Up.

EstImating False DIscovery PrOPORtion
=====================================

FroM now ON aSSume that among aLl the $P$ null hypotHEses,
_{kl}/(ns_{kk}s_{ll})$.]{} 

For ease  of n ota tio n,  let  $Z_ 1,\cdots,Z_p$b e th e standardized randomvaria bl e s of $\ wideh at{\bet a }_ 1 , \cd ot s, \wi de h at {\bet a}_ p$, tha t is, $$\l abe l{ b2}
Z_i=\fra c {\ widehat{\b eta }_i}{{\mbox{ SD} }(\wid eh at{ \ beta} _i) }=\fr ac{\wi d ehat{\ beta}_i}{ \s i gma/(\ s qrt{n}s _ { ii })},  \quad\quad i=1,\ c do t s,p.$$ In theabove,  w e  i m p lic itl y assume t ha t $\s i gma$ is kn o w n  an d  the above st andardizedr and om var ia ble s  are z -test  s t ati stics. Theesti mate of r esidua l  varian c e $\sig ma^2$wil l b e di s cu ss edin Sec t io n 6 via  refitte dcr oss-v alid a t i o n (F an,  Guo  & Ha o, 2011). The n,cond i tio ningon $\ {X_j ^i \}$,$$\lab el{c1 }(Z_1,\cdots,Z_p )^T\ sim N((\m u_1 ,\ cdo ts ,\mu_ p )^T,{\ mbo x{\ boldmat h $\Sig m a$} }) , $ $  w here $\mu_i=\sqrt{ n} \ b et a_is_{ii }/\sig m a$  a n d covari an cematr i x  ${\m box{ \ bo ldmath $ \Sigma $ }} $has the  $ (k,l)$ th  el eme nt as $s_{ kl}$.Simultan eousl y  testing (2) b a sed on $(\wid e ha t { \b e ta}_ 1,\ cdots,\wide hat{ \ beta }_p) ^ T$  is thusequiv al e nt to testing

$$\labe l{ c2}
H_ {0j}: \quad\mu_j=0\ quad\text{ v s } \quad H_ {1j} : \q u ad \mu_j\neq0,  \qua d\quad j=1 , \cdots,p $$

b ased on$(Z_1,\cd o t s,Z_p)^T $.
In  (4 ),$ { \m box{\boldmath $ \Sig ma $}}$ is  th e popul ati oncov ari an ce matrix  of $(Z_ 1, \c do ts ,Z_ p)^T$ ,  and iskn own  b ase d ont he sam ple d ata$\ {X _ j^i \}$. Th e  c o v aria nc ematr ix${ \mbox {\bo l dma th $\Si gma$}}$ c anh avear bi trary d ependence str uc ture. We w ou ldlike t o clarifythat ${\mbox{\boldmath$ \Sigma$ }}$  is k nown  and ther e i s no e sti m ationof the  cova ri anc e matri x of  $X _1 ,\cdots,X_ p $  in  this  s et u p.

Est imating False Disc o ver y Proportion=== ==== = = == === = == = === == = === = = ========

Fromnow on ass um e  t hat amonga llth e $p$ n ull hyp othes e s,
_{kl}/(ns_{kk}s_{ll})$.]{}

For ease_of notation,_let $Z_1,\cdots,Z_p$ be the_standardized random_variables_of $\widehat{\beta}_1,\cdots,\widehat{\beta}_p$,_that_is, $$\label{b2}
Z_i=\frac{\widehat{\beta}_i}{{\mbox{SD}}(\widehat{\beta}_i)}=\frac{\widehat{\beta}_i}{\sigma/(\sqrt{n}s_{ii})}, \quad\quad_i=1,\cdots,p.$$ In the_above, we implicitly assume_that $\sigma$ is_known_and the above standardized random variables are z-test statistics. The estimate of residual variance_$\sigma^2$_will be_discussed_in_Section 6 via refitted cross-validation_(Fan, Guo & Hao, 2011)._Then, conditioning_on $\{X_j^i\}$, $$\label{c1}
(Z_1,\cdots,Z_p)^T\sim N((\mu_1,\cdots,\mu_p)^T,{\mbox{\boldmath $\Sigma$}}),$$ where $\mu_i=\sqrt{n}\beta_is_{ii}/\sigma$ and_covariance_matrix ${\mbox{\boldmath $\Sigma$}}$_has the $(k,l)$th element as $s_{kl}$. Simultaneously testing (2)_based on $(\widehat{\beta}_1,\cdots,\widehat{\beta}_p)^T$ is thus equivalent_to testing

$$\label{c2}
H_{0j}:\quad\mu_j=0\quad\text{vs}\quad H_{1j}:\quad_\mu_j\neq0,_\quad\quad_j=1,\cdots,p$$

based on $(Z_1,\cdots,Z_p)^T$.

In (4),_${\mbox{\boldmath $\Sigma$}}$ is the population covariance_matrix of $(Z_1,\cdots,Z_p)^T$, and is known_based on the sample data $\{X_j^i\}$. The_covariance matrix ${\mbox{\boldmath $\Sigma$}}$ can have_arbitrary dependence structure. We would_like to_clarify that ${\mbox{\boldmath $\Sigma$}}$ is_known and there_is no_estimation of the_covariance matrix of $X_1,\cdots,X_p$ in this_set up.

Estimating False_Discovery Proportion
=====================================

From now on assume that_among_all the $p$_null_hypotheses,