, or the modes $n_*^{(1)}<n_c$ and $n_*^{(2)}>n_c$ in a, of $10^5$ simulation trajectories. For finite-size correction we use $n_c = 10\tau_d$ in a and $n_c = 22\tau_d^{4/5}$ in b. Time is in units of $1/k_1^-$.[]{data-label="fig:kz"}](fig4){width="\linewidth"}

When testing these predictions using simulations of a spatially extended physical system, the finite size of the system causes a truncation of the autocorrelation time. This truncation is usually accounted for using a finite-size correction [@chandran2012kibble]. In our system, a similar truncation of the autocorrelation time is caused by the finite number of molecules. Specifically, the inset of Fig. \[fig:ss\](b) shows that at criticality we have $\tau_c \sim n_c^{1/2}$ for large $n_c$, where $n_c$ sets the typical number of molecules in the system. Therefore, we interpret $n_c$ as a “system size,” and we correct for finite-size effects in the following way. Combining the relation $\tau_c \sim n_c^{1/2}$ with Eqs. \[eq:tauc1\] and \[eq:tauc2\], and Eqs. \[eq:kz1\] and \[eq:kz2\], we obtain $$\begin{aligned}
\label{eq:finite1}
n_c &\sim \tau_d^{2\nu z/(\nu z+1)},\\
\label{eq:finite2}
n_c &\sim \tau_d^{2\nu z/(\nu z + \beta\delta)},\end{aligned}$$ for the driving of $\theta$ or $h$, respectively. We choose $n_c$ arbitrarily for a particular driving time $\tau_d$, and when we choose a new $\tau_d$, we scale $n_c$ appropriately according to Eqs. \[eq:finite1\] and \[eq:finite2\].

This procedure allows us to test the predictions of the Kibble-Zurek mechanism using simulations of the Schlögl model. The results are shown in Fig. \[fig:kz\]. We
, or the modes $ n_*^{(1)}<n_c$ and $ n_*^{(2)}>n_c$ in a, of $ 10 ^ 5 $ simulation trajectories. For finite - size correction we practice $ n_c = 10\tau_d$ in a and $ n_c = 22\tau_d^{4/5}$ in b. Time is in unit of $ 1 / k_1 ^ -$.[]{data - label="fig: kz"}](fig4){width="\linewidth " } 

 When testing these predictions use simulation of a spatially extended physical organization, the finite size of the organization causes a shortness of the autocorrelation meter. This truncation is normally accounted for using a finite - size correction [ @chandran2012kibble ]. In our system, a exchangeable truncation of the autocorrelation time is caused by the finite number of molecules. Specifically, the insert of Fig.   \[fig: ss\](b) shows that at criticality we have $ \tau_c \sim n_c^{1/2}$ for large $ n_c$, where $ n_c$ place the typical number of molecules in the system. consequently, we interpret $ n_c$ as a “ organization size, ” and we correct for finite - size effects in the following direction. Combining the relation $ \tau_c \sim n_c^{1/2}$ with Eqs.   \[eq: tauc1\ ] and \[eq: tauc2\ ], and Eqs.   \[eq: kz1\ ] and \[eq: kz2\ ], we obtain $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 \label{eq: finite1 } 
 n_c & \sim \tau_d^{2\nu z/(\nu z+1)},\\ 
 \label{eq: finite2 } 
 n_c & \sim \tau_d^{2\nu z/(\nu z + \beta\delta)},\end{aligned}$$ for the driving of $ \theta$ or $ h$, respectively. We choose $ n_c$ arbitrarily for a particular driving time $ \tau_d$, and when we choose a new $ \tau_d$, we scale $ n_c$ appropriately according to Eqs.   \[eq: finite1\ ] and \[eq: finite2\ ]. 

 This procedure allows us to test the predictions of the Kibble - Zurek mechanism using simulations of the Schlögl model. The consequence are shown in Fig.   \[fig: kz\ ]. We
, or the modes $n_*^{(1)}<n_c$ and $n_*^{(2)}>n_c$ ik a, of $10^5$ simulation trajxctoriea. For fivite-size correction we use $n_r = 10\tqu_d$ ib a and $n_c = 22\tau_d^{4/5}$ in b. Gime is ij units if $1/k_1^-$.[]{vata-label="fig:kz"}](fij4){sidth="\likzwidtg"}

Ahen vesting these ptedictions uving simulatiots oy a spatially extended physical systqm, the gijite size of tre sjseem dauses a truncation of the autocordelatioi time. This trumcation is usually accountfd flr using a finite-slze correctuon [@syandran2012kibbld]. In our sjvtem, a simjlar truncation of the autocorrdlatipn time is cqusfg by the fiiite nlmber of moleglles. Spacificakly, the inset pf Hig. \[fug:ss\](b) shows that at cciticality we have $\twu_c \sim n_w^{1/2}$ yor large $n_c$, where $n_c$ swts tve tfpicxo njmbtr pf molecklea in the sgstem. Theredore, we interpret $n_v$ ww a “system siae,” and wq correct for finite-size effects in the fomlowing way. Combining tye relation $\tau_c \sim j_c^{1/2}$ with Ezs. \[eq:tauc1\] and \[eq:tauc2\], and Eqs. \[eq:kz1\] and \[eq:kz2\], we obtait $$\begmn{xliykcd}
\lacwl{fq:finite1}
n_c &\sim \tau_d^{2\nu z/(\nu z+1)},\\
\label{eq:finite2}
n_c &\sii \tsu_c^{2\nu z/(\nu z + \betc\delta)},\end{aligned}$$ flr jhe driving of $\theta$ or $h$, respectively. We choose $n_c$ aebitrarilr fot a particular driving time $\tau_d$, and whvn ww choose a new $\tau_b$, we scale $n_e$ apprppriayely according to Eqs. \[eq:yinite1\] and \[eq:finihe2\].

This prkzedure allows us to tast the kfedictions of the Kibble-Zucek mzchanism usimg simtlations ov the Schlögl model. The rfsultd dre shown ln Fig. \[fig:kz\]. We
, or the modes $n_*^{(1)}<n_c$ and $n_*^{(2)}>n_c$ of simulation trajectories. finite-size correction we a $n_c = 22\tau_d^{4/5}$ b. Time is units of $1/k_1^-$.[]{data-label="fig:kz"}](fig4){width="\linewidth"} When testing these using simulations of a spatially extended physical system, the finite size of the causes a truncation of the autocorrelation time. This truncation is usually accounted for a correction In system, a similar truncation of the autocorrelation time is caused by the finite number of molecules. the inset of Fig. \[fig:ss\](b) shows that at we have $\tau_c \sim for large $n_c$, where $n_c$ the number of in system. we interpret $n_c$ a “system size,” and we correct for finite-size effects in the following way. Combining the relation $\tau_c n_c^{1/2}$ with and \[eq:tauc2\], Eqs. and we obtain $$\begin{aligned} &\sim \tau_d^{2\nu z/(\nu z+1)},\\ \label{eq:finite2} n_c z + \beta\delta)},\end{aligned}$$ for the driving of $\theta$ $h$, respectively. choose $n_c$ arbitrarily for a particular time $\tau_d$, and when we choose a new we scale $n_c$ appropriately according to Eqs. \[eq:finite1\] and \[eq:finite2\]. This procedure allows us to predictions of the Kibble-Zurek using simulations of Schlögl The are in Fig. We
, or the modes $n_*^{(1)}<n_c$ and $n_*^{(2)}>n_c$ in a, of $10^5$ sImulation tRajecTorIes. foR finIte-sIze correction wE Use $n_C = 10\tau_d$ in a and $n_c = 22\tau_d^{4/5}$ in b. TiMe is iN uNIts oF $1/K_1^-$.[]{dAta-laBel="fig:kZ"}](FiG4){WIdtH="\lInEwiDtH"}

whEn tesTinG these pRedictions UsiNg Simulations oF A sPatially exTenDed physical sYstEm, the fInIte SIze of The SysteM causeS A truncAtion of thE aUTocorrELation tIME. THis tRuncation is usuallY AcCOunted for using A finitE-sIZe CORreCtiOn [@chandran2012KiBble]. IN Our systEM, a SIMIlaR Truncation of tHe autocorreLAtiOn time Is CauSEd by thE finiTe NUmbEr of moleculEs. SpEcificallY, the inSEt of Fig. \[FIg:ss\](b) shOws thaT at CriTicaLItY wE haVe $\TAu_c \SIm N_c^{1/2}$ fOR laRge $n_c$, wheRe $N_c$ Sets tHe tyPICAL numBer Of moLeculEs in the system. theRefoRE, we InterPret $n_C$ as a “SyStem sIze,” and We corReCt for finite-size EffeCts in the fOllOwIng WaY. CombINing thE reLatIon $\tau_c \Sim n_c^{1/2}$ wiTH EqS. \[eQ:TAUc1\] And \[eq:tauc2\], and Eqs. \[eq:kZ1\] aND \[Eq:Kz2\], we obtaIn $$\begiN{AlIgNEd}
\label{eQ:fIniTe1}
n_c &\SIM \tau_d^{2\Nu z/(\nU Z+1)},\\
\lAbel{eq:fiNite2}
n_c &\SIm \TaU_d^{2\nu z/(\nu Z + \bEta\delTa)},\End{AliGned}$$ fOR the DrivinG of $\theta$ Or $h$, reSPectively. We choOSe $n_c$ arbitrariLY fOR A pARticUlaR driving timE $\tau_D$, And wHen wE ChOosE A new $\tAu_d$, we ScALe $N_C$ appropriately accorDiNg to EqS. \[eq:fiNite1\] and \[eq:finiTe2\].

This procEDURe allows Us to TEsT The predictions Of the kibble-ZureK MechanisM usinG simulatIons of the sCHlögl modEl. THe rEsuLts ARE sHown in Fig. \[fig:kZ\]. wE
, or the modes $n_*^{(1)}< n_c$ and $ n_*^{ (2) }>n _c $ in  a,of $10^5$ simu l atio n trajectories. For fi nite- si z e co r re ction  we use $n _ c  =10 \t au_ d$ in  a an d $ n_c = 2 2\tau_d^{4 /5} $in b. Time i s  i n units of  $1 /k_1^-$.[]{d ata -label =" fig : kz"}] (fi g4){w idth=" \ linewi dth"}

Wh en testin g  thesep r ed icti ons using simulat i on s  of a spatiall y exte nd e dp h ysi cal  system, t he  fini t e sizeo ft h e  sy s tem causes atruncationo f t he aut oc orr e lation  time .T his  truncation  isusually a ccount e d for u s ing a f inite- siz e c orre c ti on  [@ ch a ndr a n2 012 k ibb le]. Inou rsyste m, a s i m ilar  tr unca tionof the autoco rre lati o n t ime i s cau sedby  thefinite  numb er  of molecules.Spec ifically,  th eins et  of F i g. \[f ig: ss\ ](b) sh ows tha t  at  c r i t ic ality we have $\ta u_ c \s im n_c^{ 1/2}$f or  l a rge $n_c $,  wh ere$ n _c$ s etst he  typical  numbe r  o fmolecul es  in th esys tem . The r efor e, weinterpre t $n_ c $ as a “system size,” and we co r r ec t  for  fi nite-size e ffec t s in  the fo llo w ing w ay. C om b in i ng the relation $\t au _c \si m n_c ^{1/2}$ withEqs. \[eq: t a u c1\] and  \[e q :t a uc2\], and Eqs . \[e q:kz1\] an d  \[eq:kz 2\],we obtai n $$\begi n { aligned} 
\l abe l{e q:f i n it e1}
n_c &\sim \ tau_ d^ {2\nu z /(\ nu z+1) },\ \
\ lab el{ eq :finite2} 
n_c &\s im  \ ta u_ d^{ 2\nuz /(\nu z+\be ta \de lta)} , \end{a ligne d}$$  f or the  drivin g  o f $\th et a$  or$h$ ,respe ctiv e ly.  We cho ose $n_c$  ar b itra ri ly  for aparticular dr iv ing time $ \t au_ d$, an d when wechoose a new $\tau_d$,w e scale  $n _c$ a ppro priatelyacc ording  to Eqs. \ [eq:fi nite1 \]  an d \[eq: f i ni te2 \] .

This pr o c edu re al lo ws u s to te st the predictions ofthe Kibble-Zu rek  mec h a ni smu si n g s im u lat i o ns of the Schlö gl model.Th e  r esults are sho wn  in Fig . \[fig :kz\] .  We
, or_the modes_$n_*^{(1)}<n_c$ and $n_*^{(2)}>n_c$ in_a, of_$10^5$_simulation trajectories._For_finite-size correction we_use $n_c =_10\tau_d$ in a and_$n_c = 22\tau_d^{4/5}$_in_b. Time is in units of $1/k_1^-$.[]{data-label="fig:kz"}](fig4){width="\linewidth"}

When testing these predictions using simulations of a_spatially_extended physical_system,_the_finite size of the system_causes a truncation of the_autocorrelation time._This truncation is usually accounted for using a_finite-size_correction [@chandran2012kibble]. In_our system, a similar truncation of the autocorrelation time_is caused by the finite number_of molecules. Specifically,_the_inset_of Fig. \[fig:ss\](b) shows that_at criticality we have $\tau_c \sim_n_c^{1/2}$ for large $n_c$, where $n_c$_sets the typical number of molecules in_the system. Therefore, we interpret $n_c$_as a “system size,” and_we correct_for finite-size effects in the_following way. Combining_the relation_$\tau_c \sim n_c^{1/2}$_with Eqs. \[eq:tauc1\] and \[eq:tauc2\], and Eqs. \[eq:kz1\]_and \[eq:kz2\], we_obtain $$\begin{aligned}
\label{eq:finite1}
n_c &\sim \tau_d^{2\nu z/(\nu z+1)},\\
\label{eq:finite2}
n_c_&\sim_\tau_d^{2\nu z/(\nu z_+_\beta\delta)},\end{aligned}$$_for the_driving of $\theta$_or_$h$, respectively._We_choose $n_c$ arbitrarily for a particular_driving_time $\tau_d$, and when we choose a_new $\tau_d$, we scale_$n_c$_appropriately according to Eqs. \[eq:finite1\]_and \[eq:finite2\].

This procedure allows us_to test the predictions of the_Kibble-Zurek mechanism_using simulations_of the Schlögl model. The results are shown in Fig. \[fig:kz\]. We