ometric automorphism $f$ of $\mathscr K_1$ such that $\|y-f(x)\|\leq\e$. This clearly follows from Theorem \[th:iso-uniq\] and the fact that all lines are 1-complemented in all Banach spaces, by Hahn-Banach. That cannot we achieved for $\e=0$ since the unit sphere of $\mathscr K_1$ contains (many) points where the norm is smooth and points where it is not (think of an isometric copy of, say, $\ell_\infty^2$) and note that a surjective isometry must preserve both classes.

In contrast, there is no equivalent $p$-norm rendering $\mathscr K_p$ almost isotropic when $p<1$. For if $X$ is almost isotropic and linearly isomorphic with $\mathscr K_p$, then the functional $$|x|=\|x\|+\sup_{\|x^*\|\leq 1}|x^*(x)|$$ is another $p$-norm that is preserved by every isometry for the original $p$-norm of $X$. It quickly follows (cf. [@maximal Theorem 3.3] for the complete argument) that $|x|=2\|x\|$ for all $x\in X$ and so $\|x\|=\sup_{\|x^*\|\leq 1}|x^*(x)|$, that is, $X$ is locally convex, which is not the case.

Wheeling around $\e$
--------------------

It is clear that moving the number $\e$ from here to there in the definitions opening Section 3 one obtains other variants that are more or less equivalent to these appearing in the text.

Actually the version of property $[\Game]$ and the definition of a space of almost universal complemented disposition that we have used here do not agree with those of [@GW] and [@CM-ACUD]. The following simple remark shows that $[\Game]$ is equivalent to Garbulińska’s property (E) of [@GW] and that Definition \[def:aucd\] is equivalent to Definition 3.1 in [@CM-ACUD].

\[defec\] Let $f^\dagger:E{\longrightarrow}F$ and $f^\ddagger:F{\longrightarrow}E$ be operators such that $\|f^\ddagger\, f^\dagger-{\bf 1}_E\|\leq \varepsilon$, where $\varepsilon<1$. Then there is an automorphism $a$ of $
ometric automorphism $ f$ of $ \mathscr K_1 $ such that $ \|y - f(x)\|\leq\e$. This clearly follows from Theorem   \[th: iso - uniq\ ] and the fact that all lines are 1 - complemented in all Banach space, by Hahn - Banach. That cannot we achieve for $ \e=0 $ since the unit sphere of $ \mathscr K_1 $ control (many) point where the norm is smooth and decimal point where it is not (think of an isometric copy of, say, $ \ell_\infty^2 $) and notice that a surjective isometry must save both classes. 

 In line, there is no equivalent $ p$-norm rendering $ \mathscr K_p$ almost isotropic when $ p<1$. For if $ X$ is almost isotropic and linearly isomorphous with $ \mathscr K_p$, then the functional $ $ |x|=\|x\|+\sup_{\|x^*\|\leq 1}|x^*(x)|$$ is another $ p$-norm that is preserved by every isometry for the original $ p$-norm of $ X$. It promptly follows (cf. [ @maximal Theorem   3.3 ] for the accomplished argument) that $ |x|=2\|x\|$ for all $ x\in X$ and so $ \|x\|=\sup_{\|x^*\|\leq 1}|x^*(x)|$, that is, $ X$ is locally convex, which is not the case. 

 bicycle around $ \e$ 
 -------------------- 

 It is clear that moving the number $ \e$ from here to there in the definitions open Section   3 one obtains other variants that are more or less equivalent to these appearing in the textbook. 

 Actually the version of property $ [ \Game]$ and the definition of a space of almost universal complemented disposition that we have use here do not harmonize with those of [ @GW ] and [ @CM - ACUD ]. The following simple remark shows that $ [ \Game]$ is equivalent to Garbulińska ’s property (E) of [ @GW ] and that Definition   \[def: aucd\ ] is equivalent to Definition 3.1 in [ @CM - ACUD ]. 

 \[defec\ ] Let $ f^\dagger: E{\longrightarrow}F$ and $ f^\ddagger: F{\longrightarrow}E$ be operators such that $ \|f^\ddagger\, f^\dagger-{\bf 1}_E\|\leq \varepsilon$, where $ \varepsilon<1$. Then there is an automorphism $ a$ of $
omehric automorphism $f$ of $\mxthscr K_1$ such tkqt $\|y-f(x)\|\neq\e$. Tgis cleafly follows from Theorem \[th:isl-ubiq\] abd the fact that all lknes are 1-bomplemenred mn all Banach spedes, by Mchn-Bahwch. Chet cannot we acmieved for $\a=0$ since the unht s'here of $\mathscr K_1$ contains (many) poigts whete the norm is siootn and iolnts where it is not (think of an isometgic copy of, say, $\ekl_\infty^2$) and note that a sugjechive isometry must preserve bith soasses.

In congrast, thert ns no equivzlent $p$-norm rendering $\mathscr K_o$ almpst isotroknx wjgn $p<1$. For if $E$ is ajmost isotroipc and ninearlu isomorphic wlth $\methsxr K_p$, then the functimnal $$|x|=\|x\|+\sup_{\|x^*\|\leq 1}|x^*(x)|$$ ys anothes $'$-norm that is preservwd by eeery isoowtrh fkr tge orihinel $p$-norm of $X$. It quickoy follows (cf. [@maximsl Nneorem 3.3] for tge com[lqte argument) that $|x|=2\|x\|$ for all $x\in X$ and vo $\|s\|=\sup_{\|x^*\|\leq 1}|x^*(x)|$, that is, $X$ iw locally convex, whicj is not ehe case.

Wheeling around $\e$
--------------------

It is clear that moving dhe nnmcer $\e$ weol here to there in the definitions opening Sesfipn 3 one obtains obher variants that age iore or less gquivalzht to these appearinh in thg text.

Qctually uhe vrrsion of property $[\Game]$ and the definitpon if a space of almodt universau cokplemrnted disposition that ce havs used here do not affee with those ow [@GE] dnd [@CM-ACUD]. The following symple remerk skows thag $[\Gake]$ is qquivalent to Garbulińska’s property (E) of [@GF] and that Definition \[def:aucd\] is equivalenv to Definitipn 3.1 it [@CM-ACUD].

\[befec\] Ket $f^\dagger:E{\ljngrightarrow}F$ and $f^\dbagger:W{\longrightzrrow}E$ ue operators such that $\|f^\dgwgger\, f^\daggec-{\bf 1}_E\|\leq \darepsilin$, wherd $\varepsilon<1$. Thrn there ps an qutomorphism $a$ of $
ometric automorphism $f$ of $\mathscr K_1$ such This follows from \[th:iso-uniq\] and the 1-complemented all Banach spaces, Hahn-Banach. That cannot achieved for $\e=0$ since the unit of $\mathscr K_1$ contains (many) points where the norm is smooth and points it is not (think of an isometric copy of, say, $\ell_\infty^2$) and note a isometry preserve classes. In contrast, there is no equivalent $p$-norm rendering $\mathscr K_p$ almost isotropic when $p<1$. For $X$ is almost isotropic and linearly isomorphic with K_p$, then the functional 1}|x^*(x)|$$ is another $p$-norm that preserved every isometry the $p$-norm $X$. It quickly (cf. [@maximal Theorem 3.3] for the complete argument) that $|x|=2\|x\|$ for all $x\in X$ and so $\|x\|=\sup_{\|x^*\|\leq that is, locally convex, is the Wheeling around $\e$ is clear that moving the number to there in the definitions opening Section 3 obtains other that are more or less equivalent these appearing in the text. Actually the version property $[\Game]$ and the definition of a space of almost universal complemented disposition that we here do not agree those of [@GW] [@CM-ACUD]. following remark that $[\Game]$ equivalent to Garbulińska’s property (E) of [@GW] and that Definition \[def:aucd\] equivalent to Definition 3.1 in [@CM-ACUD]. \[defec\] Let $f^\dagger:E{\longrightarrow}F$ and operators that $\|f^\ddagger\, f^\dagger-{\bf \varepsilon$, where $\varepsilon<1$. Then is automorphism $a$ of $
ometric automorphism $f$ of $\matHscr K_1$ such tHat $\|y-f(X)\|\leQ\e$. THiS cleArly Follows from TheORem \[tH:iso-uniq\] and the fact that All liNeS Are 1-cOMpLemenTed in alL baNACh sPaCeS, by haHN-BAnach. thaT cannot We achieved For $\E=0$ sInce the unit sPHeRe of $\mathscR K_1$ cOntains (many) pOinTs wherE tHe nORm is sMooTh and Points WHere it Is not (thinK oF An isomETric copY OF, sAy, $\elL_\infty^2$) and note that A SuRJective isometrY must pReSErVE BotH clAsses.

In conTrAst, thERe is no eQUiVALEnt $P$-Norm rendering $\Mathscr K_p$ alMOst IsotroPiC whEN $p<1$. For iF $X$ is aLmOSt iSotropic and LineArly isomoRphic wITh $\mathsCR K_p$, then The funCtiOnaL $$|x|=\|x\|+\sUP_{\|x^*\|\LeQ 1}|x^*(x)|$$ Is ANotHEr $P$-noRM thAt is presErVeD by evEry iSOMETry fOr tHe orIginaL $p$-norm of $X$. It quIckLy foLLowS (cf. [@maXimal theoReM 3.3] for tHe compLete aRgUment) that $|x|=2\|x\|$ for aLl $x\iN X$ and so $\|x\|=\sUp_{\|x^*\|\LeQ 1}|x^*(x)|$, ThAt is, $X$ IS localLy cOnvEx, which Is not thE CasE.

WHEELiNg around $\e$
--------------------

It is clear ThAT MoVing the nUmber $\e$ FRoM hERe to therE iN thE defINItionS opeNInG Section 3 One obtAInS oTher varIaNts thaT aRe mOre Or lesS EquiValent To these aPpearINg in the text.

ActUAlly the versioN Of PROpERty $[\GAme]$ And the definItioN Of a sPace OF aLmoST univErsal CoMPlEMented disposition thAt We have Used hEre do not agree With those oF [@gw] And [@CM-ACUd]. The FOlLOwing simple remArk shOws that $[\GamE]$ Is equivaLent tO GarbuliŃska’s propERTy (E) of [@GW] aNd tHat defIniTIOn \[Def:aucd\] is equiVALent To definitIon 3.1 In [@CM-ACUd].

\[deFec\] let $F^\daGgEr:E{\longriGhtarrow}f$ aNd $F^\dDaGgeR:F{\lonGRightarrOw}e$ be OpEraTors sUCh that $\|F^\ddagGer\, f^\DaGgER-{\bf 1}_e\|\leq \varEPsILOn$, whErE $\vArepSilOn<1$. then tHere IS an AutomorPhism $a$ of $
ometric automorphism $f$ o f $\mathsc r K_1 $ s uch  t hat$\|y -f(x)\|\leq\e$ .  Thi s clearly follows from  Theo re m  \[t h :i so-un iq\] an d  t h e  fa ct  t hat  a l llines  ar e 1-com plementedinal l Banach spa c es , by Hahn- Ban ach. That ca nno t we a ch iev e d for  $\ e=0$sincet he uni t sphereof $\math s cr K_1$ c on tain s (many) points w h er e  the norm is s moothan d  p o i nts  wh ere it isno t (th i nk of a n  i s o m etr i c copy of, sa y, $\ell_\i n fty ^2$) a nd  no t e that  a su rj e cti ve isometry  mus t preserv e both classes . 

In co ntrast , t her e is no  e qui va l ent $p $-n o rmrenderin g$\ maths cr K _ p $ almo stisot ropic  when $p<1$.For  if$ X$is al mostisot ro pic a nd lin early  i somorphic with$\ma thscr K_p $,th enth e fun c tional  $$ |x| =\|x\|+ \sup_{\ | x^* \| \ l e q1}|x^*(x)|$$ is an ot h e r$p$-norm  thati spr e served b yeve ry i s o metry  for th e origin al $p$ - no rm  of $X$ .It qui ck lyfol lows( cf.[@maxi mal Theo rem 3 . 3] for the com p lete argument )  t h a t$ |x|= 2\| x\|$ for al l $x \ in X $ an d  s o $ \ |x\|= \sup_ {\ | x^ * \|\leq 1}|x^*(x)|$,  t hat is , $X$  is locally c onvex, whi c h is not t he c a se . 

Wheeling aro und $ \e$
------ - -------- ----- 

It isclear tha t moving t henum ber  $\ e $  f rom here to t h e re i nthe def ini tions o pen ing  Se cti on  3 one ob tains ot he rva ri ant s tha t  are mor eorle ssequiv a lent t o the se a pp ea r ing  in the te x t .

A ct ua llythe  v ersio n of pro perty $ [\Game]$and thede fi nitionof a space of  a lmost univ er sal  compl e m ented di sposition that we haveu sed her e d o not  agr ee with t hos e of [ @GW ]  and [ @CM-AC UD].Th e f o l lowin g si mpl eremark sho w s  th at $[ \G ame] $ is eq uivalent to Garbul i ńsk a’s property(E)  of[ @ GW ] a n dt hat  D e fin i t ion \[def:aucd\ ] is equiv al e nt  to Defini t ion  3 .1 in [ @CM-ACU D].
\ [defec\ ] Let $f^ \dagger:E {\ long r i ght arrow}F$ a nd $f^\d dagger:F{ \ longr i gh tarro w}E $ be o pe rat ors s uch th a t $ \|f^\ ddagge r\ , f^\d agger -{ \bf 1}_E \|\leq \varepsilon$, wh ere $\ varep sil on<1$. Th ent her e is an a utom orphism $a $ o f $ 
ometric automorphism_$f$ of_$\mathscr K_1$ such that_$\|y-f(x)\|\leq\e$. This_clearly_follows from_Theorem \[th:iso-uniq\]_and the fact_that all lines_are 1-complemented in all_Banach spaces, by_Hahn-Banach._That cannot we achieved for $\e=0$ since the unit sphere of $\mathscr K_1$ contains_(many)_points where_the_norm_is smooth and points where_it is not (think of_an isometric_copy of, say, $\ell_\infty^2$) and note that a_surjective_isometry must preserve_both classes.

In contrast, there is no equivalent $p$-norm rendering_$\mathscr K_p$ almost isotropic when $p<1$._For if $X$_is_almost_isotropic and linearly isomorphic_with $\mathscr K_p$, then the functional_$$|x|=\|x\|+\sup_{\|x^*\|\leq 1}|x^*(x)|$$ is another $p$-norm that_is preserved by every isometry for the_original $p$-norm of $X$. It quickly_follows (cf. [@maximal Theorem 3.3] for_the complete_argument) that $|x|=2\|x\|$ for all_$x\in X$ and_so $\|x\|=\sup_{\|x^*\|\leq_1}|x^*(x)|$, that is,_$X$ is locally convex, which is_not the case.

Wheeling_around $\e$
--------------------

It is clear that moving_the_number $\e$ from_here_to_there in_the definitions opening_Section 3_one obtains_other_variants that are more or less_equivalent_to these appearing in the text.

Actually the_version of property $[\Game]$_and_the definition of a_space of almost universal complemented_disposition that we have used here_do not_agree with_those of [@GW] and [@CM-ACUD]. The following simple remark shows that_$[\Game]$ is equivalent to Garbulińska’s property_(E) of [@GW] and_that Definition \[def:aucd\]_is_equivalent to Definition_3.1_in [@CM-ACUD].

\[defec\]_Let $f^\dagger:E{\longrightarrow}F$ and $f^\ddagger:F{\longrightarrow}E$ be operators such_that $\|f^\ddagger\,_f^\dagger-{\bf 1}_E\|\leq \varepsilon$, where $\varepsilon<1$. Then_there is an automorphism_$a$_of $