, with the magnetic term included with a coupling constant $\kappa$ relative to the electric term. If we expand in the manner of Eq. (\[Div\]), and integrate over the divergence, it only contributes a velocity-independent interaction term to the Hamiltonian. We can however retain its full form, and find that the conjugate momenta are now $$P^{\mu}(x) \equiv F^{\mu 0}(x) + \kappa \tilde{F}^{\mu 0},
\label{NewP}$$ i.e. the sum of the electric and magnetic fields. The new Hamiltonian then becomes $$H^{\prime} = \int d^3x \Big( \frac12 {\langle}P^i,P^i {\rangle}+ \frac14 (1 - \kappa^2) {\langle}F_{ij}, F_{ij} {\rangle}+ \frac12 \kappa \epsilon^{ijk} {\langle}P^i, F_{jk} {\rangle}- {\langle}A_0, \partial_i P^i + [P^i,A_i] {\rangle}\Big).$$ Inspection of this Hamiltonian reveals that the dynamics can be simplified by the choice of the coupling parameter, so henceforth we will put $\kappa = 1$, as we did initially in our [*ad hoc*]{} construction.

The constraint structure is similar to the electric case, and results in the final constraint $\Lambda^{\prime} = 3 \epsilon^{ijk} [P^i,A_j,A_k] + 6 [A_0,P^i,A_i]$, with $$\begin{aligned}
\frac16 \frac{d\Lambda^{\prime}}{dt} & = &
\epsilon^{ijk} \Big( \frac12 [[A_0,P^i],A_j,A_k] + [P^i,\partial_j A_0, A_k]
+ [P^i,[A_0,A_j],A_k] \nonumber \\
& & + [A_0,\partial_j P^i,A_k] + [A_0,[P^i,A_j],A_k] + \frac12 [A_0,P^i,F_{jk}]
\Big) \nonumber \\
& & + [\partial_j P^i,A_i,A_j] + [[P^i,A
, with the magnetic term included with a coupling changeless $ \kappa$ relative to the electric condition. If we expand in the manner of Eq.   (\[Div\ ]), and integrate over the divergence, it entirely contributes a velocity - autonomous interaction term to the Hamiltonian. We can however retain its full form, and recover that the conjugate momenta are now $ $ P^{\mu}(x) \equiv F^{\mu 0}(x) + \kappa \tilde{F}^{\mu 0 }, 
 \label{NewP}$$ i.e. the union of the electric and magnetic fields. The raw Hamiltonian then become $ $ H^{\prime } = \int d^3x \Big (\frac12 { \langle}P^i, P^i { \rangle}+ \frac14 (1 - \kappa^2) { \langle}F_{ij }, F_{ij } { \rangle}+ \frac12 \kappa \epsilon^{ijk } { \langle}P^i, F_{jk } { \rangle}- { \langle}A_0, \partial_i P^i + [ P^i, A_i ] { \rangle}\Big).$$ Inspection of this Hamiltonian reveals that the dynamics can be simplified by the choice of the coupling argument, so henceforth we will put $ \kappa = 1 $, as we did initially in our [ * ad hoc * ] { } construction. 

 The restraint structure is similar to the electric case, and results in the final restraint $ \Lambda^{\prime } = 3 \epsilon^{ijk } [ P^i, A_j, A_k ] + 6 [ A_0,P^i, A_i]$, with $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 \frac16 \frac{d\Lambda^{\prime}}{dt } & = & 
 \epsilon^{ijk } \Big (\frac12 [ [ A_0,P^i],A_j, A_k ] + [ P^i,\partial_j A_0, A_k ] 
 + [ P^i,[A_0,A_j],A_k ] \nonumber \\ 
 & & + [ A_0,\partial_j P^i, A_k ] + [ A_0,[P^i, A_j],A_k ] + \frac12 [ A_0,P^i, F_{jk } ] 
 \Big) \nonumber \\ 
 & & + [ \partial_j P^i, A_i, A_j ] + [ [ P^i, A
, wihh the magnetic term incuuded with a coopoing cmnstanf $\kappa$ felative to the electric terl. Uf we expand in the manner uf Eq. (\[Div\]), wnd intetratt over the divergxhce, it only ckktribbtxs a velocity-incependent hnteraction tesm tl the Hamiltonian. We can however reeain itx vull form, and sind ehat nht conjugate momenta are now $$P^{\mu}(x) \squiv F^{\ku 0}(x) + \kappa \tolde{F}^{\mu 0},
\label{NewP}$$ i.e. the skm ov the electric and magnetic fueldf. The new Hamkltonian then becomes $$G^{\prime} = \int d^3x \Big( \frac12 {\langle}P^k,P^i {\rcngle}+ \frac14 (1 - \japod^2) {\langle}F_{ij}, F_{ij} {\gangle}+ \frac12 \kappa \epshlon^{ijk} {\langle}P^i, F_{jk} {\vanglx}- {\labgle}A_0, \partial_i P^i + [P^i,E_i] {\rangle}\Big).$$ Inspectyon of thhs Hamiltonian reveqlw thaj the dynxnicr czn bs simppifmed by the dhoice of tye coupling paramettr, fi henceforth se wilj [ut $\kappa = 1$, as we did initially in our [*dd goc*]{} construction.

The conwtraint structure is dimilar tj the electric case, and results in the final consdrainv $\Uamyea^{\priow} = 3 \epsilon^{ijk} [P^i,A_j,A_k] + 6 [A_0,P^i,A_i]$, with $$\begin{aligned}
\sdav16 \nrac{d\Lambda^{\prime}}{bt} & = &
\epsilon^{ijk} \Nih( \gtac12 [[A_0,P^i],A_j,A_k] + [P^k,\particm_j A_0, A_k]
+ [P^i,[A_0,A_j],A_k] \nonulber \\
& & + [A_0,\parrial_j P^i,A_h] + [A_0,[L^i,A_j],A_k] + \frac12 [A_0,P^i,F_{jk}]
\Big) \nonunber \\
& & + [\partpal_j P^i,A_i,A_j] + [[P^i,A
, with the magnetic term included with constant relative to electric term. If of (\[Div\]), and integrate the divergence, it contributes a velocity-independent interaction term to Hamiltonian. We can however retain its full form, and find that the conjugate are now $$P^{\mu}(x) \equiv F^{\mu 0}(x) + \kappa \tilde{F}^{\mu 0}, \label{NewP}$$ i.e. the of electric magnetic The new Hamiltonian then becomes $$H^{\prime} = \int d^3x \Big( \frac12 {\langle}P^i,P^i {\rangle}+ \frac14 (1 - {\langle}F_{ij}, F_{ij} {\rangle}+ \frac12 \kappa \epsilon^{ijk} {\langle}P^i, F_{jk} {\langle}A_0, \partial_i P^i + {\rangle}\Big).$$ Inspection of this Hamiltonian that dynamics can simplified the of the coupling so henceforth we will put $\kappa = 1$, as we did initially in our [*ad hoc*]{} construction. constraint structure to the case, results the final constraint 3 \epsilon^{ijk} [P^i,A_j,A_k] + 6 [A_0,P^i,A_i]$, \frac{d\Lambda^{\prime}}{dt} & = & \epsilon^{ijk} \Big( \frac12 [[A_0,P^i],A_j,A_k] [P^i,\partial_j A_0, + [P^i,[A_0,A_j],A_k] \nonumber \\ & & [A_0,\partial_j P^i,A_k] + [A_0,[P^i,A_j],A_k] + \frac12 [A_0,P^i,F_{jk}] \Big) \\ & & + [\partial_j P^i,A_i,A_j] + [[P^i,A
, with the magnetic term includEd with a couPling ConStaNt $\KappA$ relAtive to the elecTRic tErm. If we expand in the mannEr of EQ. (\[DIV\]), and INtEgratE over thE DiVERgeNcE, iT onLy COnTribuTes A velociTy-independEnt InTeraction terM To The HamiltoNiaN. We can howeveR reTain itS fUll FOrm, anD fiNd thaT the coNJugate Momenta arE nOW $$P^{\mu}(x) \eQUiv F^{\mu 0}(x) + \KAPpA \tilDe{F}^{\mu 0},
\label{NewP}$$ i.e. tHE sUM of the electric And magNeTIc FIEldS. ThE new HamiltOnIan thEN becomeS $$h^{\pRIME} = \inT D^3x \Big( \frac12 {\langLe}P^i,P^i {\ranglE}+ \FraC14 (1 - \kappa^2) {\LaNglE}f_{ij}, F_{ij} {\RanglE}+ \fRAc12 \kAppa \epsilon^{Ijk} {\lAngle}P^i, F_{jK} {\ranglE}- {\Langle}A_0, \PArtial_i p^i + [P^i,A_i] {\RanGle}\big).$$ INSpEcTioN oF ThiS haMilTOniAn revealS tHaT the dYnamICS CAn be SimPlifIed by The choice of thE coUpliNG paRametEr, so hEnceFoRth we Will puT $\kappA = 1$, aS we did initially In ouR [*ad hoc*]{} conStrUcTioN.

THe conSTraint StrUctUre is siMilar to THe eLeCTRIc Case, and results in thE fINAl ConstraiNt $\LambDA^{\pRiME} = 3 \epsilon^{IjK} [P^i,a_j,A_k] + 6 [a_0,p^I,A_i]$, wiTh $$\beGIn{Aligned}
\fRac16 \fraC{D\LAmBda^{\primE}}{dT} & = &
\epsilOn^{Ijk} \big( \Frac12 [[A_0,p^I],A_j,A_K] + [P^i,\parTial_j A_0, A_k]
+ [p^i,[A_0,A_j],a_K] \nonumber \\
& & + [A_0,\partIAl_j P^i,A_k] + [A_0,[P^i,A_j],A_K] + \FrAC12 [a_0,P^I,f_{jk}]
\BIg) \nOnumber \\
& & + [\partIal_j p^I,A_i,A_J] + [[P^i,A
, with the magnetic term i ncluded wi th acou pli ng  con stan t $\kappa$ rel a tive  to the electric term.  If w ee xpan d  i n the  manner of E q.(\ [D iv\ ]) ,  a nd in teg rate ov er the div erg en ce, it onlyc on tributes a  ve locity-indep end ent in te rac t ion t erm  to t he Ham i ltonia n. We can  h o weverr etain i t s  f ullform, and find th a tt he conjugate m omenta  a r en o w $ $P^ {\mu}(x) \ eq uiv F ^ {\mu 0} ( x) + \ka p pa \tilde{F}^ {\mu 0},
\l a bel {NewP} $$  i. e . thesum o ft heelectric an d ma gnetic fi elds.T he newH amilton ian th enbec omes $$ H^ {\p ri m e}=  \ int d^3 x \Big(\f ra c12 { \lan g l e } P^i, P^i  {\r angle }+ \frac14 (1  -\kap p a^2 ) {\l angle }F_{ ij }, F_ {ij} { \rang le }+ \frac12 \kap pa \ epsilon^{ ijk }{\l an gle}P ^ i, F_{ jk}  {\ rangle} - {\lan g le} A_ 0 , \p artial_i P^i + [P^ i, A _ i]  {\rangl e}\Big ) .$ $I nspectio nofthis H amilt onia n  r eveals t hat th e  d yn amics c an  be si mp lif ied  by t h e ch oice o f the co uplin g  parameter, so henceforth we wi l l  p u t $\ kap pa = 1$, as  wed id i niti a ll y i n  our[*adho c *] { } construction.

Th econstr aintstructure issimilar to t h e electr ic c a se ,  and results i n the  final con s traint $ \Lamb da^{\pri me} = 3 \ e p silon^{i jk}  [P ^i, A_j , A _k ] + 6 [A_0,P^ i , A_i] $,  with $ $\b egin{al ign ed} 
\f rac 16  \frac{d\ Lambda^{ \p ri me }} {dt } & = &
\epsil on ^{i jk } \ Big(\ frac12  [[A_ 0,P^ i] ,A _ j,A _k] + [ P ^i , \ part ia l_ j A_ 0,A_ k]
+[P^i , [A_ 0,A_j], A_k] \non umb e r \\ 
&  &  + [A_0 ,\partial_j P ^i ,A_k] + [A _0 ,[P ^i,A_j ] , A_k] + \ frac12 [A_0,P^i,F_{jk}] \Big) \ non umber  \\& & + [\p art ial_jP^i , A_i,A_ j] + [ [P^i, A
, with_the magnetic_term included with a_coupling constant_$\kappa$_relative to_the_electric term. If_we expand in_the manner of Eq. (\[Div\]),_and integrate over_the_divergence, it only contributes a velocity-independent interaction term to the Hamiltonian. We can however_retain_its full_form,_and_find that the conjugate momenta_are now $$P^{\mu}(x) \equiv F^{\mu_0}(x) +_\kappa \tilde{F}^{\mu 0},
\label{NewP}$$ i.e. the sum of the_electric_and magnetic fields._The new Hamiltonian then becomes $$H^{\prime} = \int d^3x_\Big( \frac12 {\langle}P^i,P^i {\rangle}+ \frac14 (1_- \kappa^2) {\langle}F_{ij},_F_{ij}_{\rangle}+_\frac12 \kappa \epsilon^{ijk} {\langle}P^i,_F_{jk} {\rangle}- {\langle}A_0, \partial_i P^i +_[P^i,A_i] {\rangle}\Big).$$ Inspection of this Hamiltonian_reveals that the dynamics can be simplified_by the choice of the coupling_parameter, so henceforth we will_put $\kappa_= 1$, as we did_initially in our_[*ad hoc*]{}_construction.

The constraint structure_is similar to the electric case,_and results in_the final constraint $\Lambda^{\prime} = 3_\epsilon^{ijk}_[P^i,A_j,A_k] + 6_[A_0,P^i,A_i]$,_with_$$\begin{aligned}
\frac16 \frac{d\Lambda^{\prime}}{dt}_& = &
\epsilon^{ijk}_\Big(_\frac12 [[A_0,P^i],A_j,A_k]_+_[P^i,\partial_j A_0, A_k]
+ [P^i,[A_0,A_j],A_k] \nonumber \\
&_&_+ [A_0,\partial_j P^i,A_k] + [A_0,[P^i,A_j],A_k] + \frac12_[A_0,P^i,F_{jk}]
\Big) \nonumber \\
& &_+_[\partial_j P^i,A_i,A_j] + [[P^i,A