 limiting surface brightness of $\mu_g \sim 25.5 \rm ~mag~ arcsec^{-2}$), but also on the spectroscopy of (nominally) all galaxies brighter than $r<17.77$ mag[^1] (with effective surface brightness $\mu_e<24.5 \rm ~mag~ arcsec^{-2}$).\
The present “near-field cosmology” project makes use of the photometry and the spectroscopy provided by SDSS much in the way astronomers use telescopes in “service observing” mode, but counting on an almost unlimited amount of observing time. By saying so we wish to emphasize that, opposite to most SDSS statistical analyzes that are based on such large number of objects that cannot be inspected individually, the number of galaxies ($\sim$ 4000) in the present study is large enough to ensure statistical significance, but not too large to prevent individual inspection of all images and spectra. The Coma supercluster constitutes the ideal bridge between the near-field and the high-$z$ cosmology.\
Several modern studies based on hundreds of thousands galaxies from the SDSS in the local universe (usually $0.05<z<0.2$) address environmental issues by quantifying the dependence of galaxy structural and photometric parameters from the local galaxy density. The density around each galaxy is computed counting galaxies in cylinders of given projected radius and depth in the redshift space. Most studies adopt 2 Mpc and 500 $\rm km s^{-1}$ (e.g. Kauffmann et al. 2004) or 1 Mpc and 1000 $\rm km s^{-1}$ (e.g. Hogg et al. 2004), as a compromise for detecting structures intermediate between large groups and small clusters. It is not easy however to visualize what type of structures are found by these automatic algorithms. The present study gives the opportunity to reciprocally calibrate structures that are seen individually in the CS with those that are detected by statistical means.\
It is well know that the SDSS pipelines have not been designed for extracting parameters of extended nearby galaxies, which results in problems in creating reliable low-redshift catalogs, due to: 1) “shredding” of large galaxies in multiple pieces leading to wrong magnitude determinations. 2) slight (20%) underestimate of the brightness of galaxies larger than $r_{50}\sim 20"$ due to the way the photometric pipeline determines the median sky, biasing the sky brightness near large extended galaxies, as reported by Mandelbaum et al. (2005), Lauer et al.
limiting surface brightness of $ \mu_g \sim 25.5 \rm ~mag~ arcsec^{-2}$), but also on the spectroscopy of (nominally) all galaxy bright than $ r<17.77 $ mag[^1 ] (with effective surface luminosity $ \mu_e<24.5 \rm ~mag~ arcsec^{-2}$).\ 
 The present “ near - playing field cosmology ” project have use of the photometry and the spectroscopy provided by SDSS much in the manner astronomers use telescope in “ service observing ” mode, but counting on an about unlimited amount of note time. By saying thus we wish to emphasize that, opposite to most SDSS statistical analyzes that are based on such big number of objects that cannot be inspected individually, the number of galaxy ($ \sim$ 4000) in the present study is large enough to ensure statistical significance, but not too big to prevent individual inspection of all images and spectra. The Coma supercluster constitutes the ideal bridge between the near - field and the high-$z$ cosmology.\ 
 Several modern studies based on hundreds of thousands galaxies from the SDSS in the local universe (usually $ 0.05 < z<0.2 $) address environmental issues by quantifying the addiction of galax structural and photometric parameters from the local galaxy concentration. The concentration around each galaxy is computed counting galaxies in cylinders of given projected radius and astuteness in the redshift space. Most studies adopt 2 Mpc and 500 $ \rm km s^{-1}$ (e.g. Kauffmann et al. 2004) or 1 Mpc and 1000 $ \rm km s^{-1}$ (e.g. Hogg et al. 2004), as a compromise for detecting structures intermediate between large group and small bunch. It is not comfortable however to visualize what character of structures are found by these automatic algorithms. The present study gives the opportunity to reciprocally calibrate structures that are seen individually in the c with those that are detected by statistical means.\ 
 It is well know that the SDSS pipelines have not been designed for distill parameters of elongated nearby galaxies, which results in problem in creating dependable low - red shift catalogs, due to: 1) “ shredding ” of big galaxies in multiple pieces precede to wrong order of magnitude determinations. 2) slight (20 %) underestimate of the brightness of galax larger than $ r_{50}\sim 20"$ due to the way the photometric pipeline determines the median sky, bias the sky brightness near large drawn-out galaxies, as reported by Mandelbaum et al. (2005), Lauer et al.
 liliting surface brightnesr of $\mu_g \sim 25.5 \rm ~mag~ accsec^{-2}$), bht also un the spectroscopy of (nominelly) all talaxies brighter than $r<17.77$ mag[^1] (winh effectuve wyrface brijgtness $\mu_e<24.5 \rm ~lag~ crrsec^{-2}$).\
The present “near-field cosmology” probezt makes use of the photometry and thq specttodcopy provided by XQSS jlcm in the way astronomers use telsscopes in “service onserving” mode, but counting on wn almost unlimitef amount of obsqeving time. Bh saying so we wish to emphasize that, opposite to mosg SDSX statistixao ajdlyzes that are fased on sucm large number of objects thst rannit be inspected indivmdually, the number os galaxiev ($\aim$ 4000) in the presebt studi is nargd enuugg vo snsure stetistical sjgnificance, but not too large uo [grvent indivisual igs[ection of all images and spectra. The Cmma supercluster constitutws the ideal bridge bgtween the near-field and the high-$z$ cosmology.\
Several modern vtudixs baweq in hundreds of thousands galaxies from the SDSS jn tme local universc (usually $0.05<z<0.2$) addresx fnfyronmental isrues bv qhantifying the depfndence of gqlaxy strtctutal and photometric parametwrs from the oocal galaxy densicy. The densicy aroond eavh galaxy is computed cuuntjng galaxied in cylihaers of given prujebted radius and depth in the rqdshift s'ace. Kost stjdiex adope 2 Mpc and 500 $\rm km s^{-1}$ (e.g. Kauffmann eh al. 2004) os 1 Mpc and 1000 $\rm km s^{-1}$ (e.g. Hogg et al. 2004), as a compromise for cedecning struetures intermediate between large groups and rmall clusners. It iv not easy rowever to vivoalize what tbpe of stwuctyres are fojvd by these auyomatic algorithms. Rhe present study nives fhe opportunity to reciprocally cslicraee svructtses that are seev ivcividjally in thc CR wiyh those that are dedectsd by statistical kewns.\
It is well knjw that the SCSS pipelines have not ueen dxsignec fjr extracting parameters of exfended newrbn galaxies, whych vesujts in proylems in creating reliable low-redshift cetalogs, due to: 1) “shreddibg” of large galaxiex in multiplx piecqs leadinc to wrong magnitude determinations. 2) xlight (20%) underestimate of tha brihhtness of galaxies larger than $r_{50}\sim 20"$ due to the way the photometric pipeoine dxtqrmines the medoan sny, yiasing the rky brightness nvar large extended galaxies, as rxported by Mcndelbaum et al. (2005), Lauer et al.
limiting surface brightness of $\mu_g \sim 25.5 arcsec^{-2}$), also on spectroscopy of (nominally) mag[^1] effective surface brightness \rm ~mag~ arcsec^{-2}$).\ present “near-field cosmology” project makes use the photometry and the spectroscopy provided by SDSS much in the way astronomers telescopes in “service observing” mode, but counting on an almost unlimited amount of time. saying we to emphasize that, opposite to most SDSS statistical analyzes that are based on such large number objects that cannot be inspected individually, the number galaxies ($\sim$ 4000) in present study is large enough ensure significance, but too to individual inspection of images and spectra. The Coma supercluster constitutes the ideal bridge between the near-field and the high-$z$ cosmology.\ modern studies hundreds of galaxies the in the local $0.05<z<0.2$) address environmental issues by quantifying galaxy structural and photometric parameters from the local density. The around each galaxy is computed counting in cylinders of given projected radius and depth the redshift space. Most studies adopt 2 Mpc and 500 $\rm km s^{-1}$ (e.g. Kauffmann 2004) or 1 Mpc 1000 $\rm km (e.g. et 2004), a compromise detecting structures intermediate between large groups and small clusters. It is easy however to visualize what type of structures are found automatic The present study the opportunity to reciprocally structures are seen individually in with that statistical It well know that the pipelines have not been designed extracting parameters of extended problems in creating reliable low-redshift catalogs, due to: “shredding” of large galaxies in multiple pieces to wrong magnitude determinations. 2) slight (20%) underestimate of the brightness of larger than due to the way the photometric pipeline determines median sky, biasing the brightness near large extended galaxies, as reported by Mandelbaum al. Lauer et
 limiting surface brightness Of $\mu_g \sim 25.5 \rm ~Mag~ arCseC^{-2}$), buT aLso oN the Spectroscopy of (NOminAlly) all galaxies brighteR than $R<17.77$ mAG[^1] (witH EfFectiVe surfaCE bRIGhtNeSs $\Mu_e<24.5 \Rm ~MAg~ ArcseC^{-2}$).\
ThE presenT “near-field CosMoLogy” project mAKeS use of the pHotOmetry and the SpeCtroscOpY prOVided By SdSS muCh in thE Way astRonomers uSe TElescoPEs in “serVICe ObseRving” mode, but countINg ON an almost unlimIted amOuNT oF OBseRviNg time. By saYiNg so wE Wish to eMPhASIZe tHAt, opposite to mOst SDSS statIStiCal anaLyZes THat are Based On SUch Large number Of obJects that Cannot BE inspecTEd indivIduallY, thE nuMber OF gAlAxiEs ($\SIm$ 4000) iN ThE prESenT study is LaRgE enouGh to ENSURe stAtiSticAl sigNificance, but nOt tOo laRGe tO prevEnt inDiviDuAl insPectioN of alL iMages and spectra. the COma supercLusTeR coNsTitutES the idEal BriDge betwEen the nEAr-fIeLD ANd The high-$z$ cosmology.\
SEvERAl Modern stUdies bASeD oN Hundreds Of ThoUsanDS GalaxIes fROm The SDSS iN the loCAl UnIverse (uSuAlly $0.05<z<0.2$) aDdResS enVironMEntaL issueS by quantIfyinG The dependence oF Galaxy structuRAl AND pHOtomEtrIc parameterS froM The lOcal GAlAxy DEnsitY. The dEnSItY Around each galaxy is cOmPuted cOuntiNg galaxies in cYlinders of GIVEn projecTed rADiUS and depth in the RedshIft space. MoST studies Adopt 2 mpc and 500 $\rm Km s^{-1}$ (e.g. KaufFMAnn et al. 2004) oR 1 MpC anD 1000 $\rm Km s^{-1}$ (E.G. hoGg et al. 2004), as a compROMise FoR detectIng StructuRes IntErmEdiAtE between lArge grouPs AnD sMaLl cLusteRS. It is not EaSy hOwEveR to viSUalize What tYpe oF sTrUCtuRes are fOUnD BY theSe AuTomaTic AlGoritHms. THE prEsent stUdy gives tHe oPPortUnItY to reciProcally calibRaTe structurEs ThaT are seEN IndividuAlly in the CS with those thaT Are deteCteD by stAtisTical meanS.\
It Is well KnoW That thE SDSS pIpeliNeS haVE Not beEN DeSigNeD for extracTINg pArameTeRs of ExtendeD nearby galaxies, whiCH reSults in probleMs iN creATInG reLIaBLe lOw-REdsHIFt catalogs, due to: 1) “Shredding” oF lARgE galaxies iN MulTiPle piecEs leadiNg to wROng magnItude deteRminationS. 2) sLighT (20%) UNdeRestimate oF the brigHtness of gALaxieS LaRger tHan $R_{50}\sim 20"$ duE tO thE way tHe photOMetRic piPeline DeTerminEs the MeDian sky, bIasing the sky brightness nEar larGe extEndEd galaxieS, as REpoRted by ManDelbAum et al. (2005), LauEr eT al.
 limiting surface brightne ss of $\mu _g \s im25. 5\rm~mag ~ arcsec^{-2}$ ) , bu t also on the spectros copyof (nom i na lly)all gal a xi e s  br ig ht erth a n$r<17 .77 $ mag[^ 1] (with e ffe ct ive surfaceb ri ghtness $\ mu_ e<24.5 \rm ~ mag ~ arcs ec ^{- 2 }$).\ 
Th e pre sent “ n ear-fi eld cosmo lo g y” pro j ect mak e s  u se o f the photometrya nd the spectrosco py pro vi d ed b y S DSS  much in t he  waya stronom e rs u s e t e lescopes in “ service obs e rvi ng” mo de , b u t coun tingon analmost unli mite d amountof obs e rving t i me. Bysaying  so  we  wis h  t oemp ha s ize th at, opp osite to  m os t SDS S st a t i s tica l a naly zes t hat are based  on  suc h  la rge n umber  ofob jects  thatcanno tbe inspected in divi dually, t henu mbe rof ga l axies($\ sim $ 4000)  in the pre se n t st udy is large enoug ht o  e nsure st atisti c al  s i gnifican ce , b ut n o t  toolarg e  t o preven t indi v id ua l inspe ct ion of  a llima ges a n d sp ectra.  The Com a sup e rcluster const i tutes the ide a lb r id g e be twe en the near -fie l d an d th e  h igh - $z$ c osmol og y .\ Several modern stud ie s base d onhundreds of t housands g a l a xies fro m th e  S D SS in the loca l uni verse (usu a lly $0.0 5<z<0 .2$) add ress envi r o nmentaliss ues  by  qu a n ti fying the dep e n denc eof gala xystructu ral  an d p hot om etric par ametersfr om  t he  lo cal g a laxy den si ty.  T hedensi t y arou nd ea ch g al ax y  is  comput e dc o unti ng  g alax ies  i n cyl inde r s o f given  projecte d r a dius  a nd  depthin the redshi ft  space. Mo st  st udiesa d opt 2 Mp c and 500 $\rm km s^{-1 } $ (e.g.  Ka uffma nn e t al. 200 4)or 1 M pca nd 100 0 $\rm  km s ^{ -1} $ (e.g. H og g e tal. 2004), a s a  comp ro mise  for de tecting structures int ermediate bet wee n la r g egro u ps and  s m all c lusters. It isnot easy h ow e ve r to visua l ize  w hat typ e of st ructu r es arefound bythese aut om atic a lgo rithms. Th e presen t study g i ves t h eoppor tun ity to  r eci proca lly ca l ibr ate s tructu re s that  arese en indiv idually in the CS withthosethatare  detected  by sta tisticalmean s.\
It iswel l k now t hat the S DSSp ip eli n es ha ve n o t been de s ig ned f or  extracting p a ram eters  of extend ed n earby galaxies, w h ich results in  pro b l ems  in crea ti ng reliable lo w-r ed s h ift cata lo gs, due to:  1) “shr ed d ing”of lar ge gal axies i n mu l tiplepiec esleading t o w ro n g magni tu de determ inat io ns. 2)  sligh t  (20 % )  underestimate o f the b right n ess  of g al axies l a rger  than $r_{ 50}\sim 20" $ dueto t he wa y the p ho tometr icpi peline det e rmines th e med ian sky ,bias ing  the s ky b r i ghtne ss n ea r l arge exte n d ed ga la x ies , as  repo rt ed b y Mandelb a um et al . ( 2 005), L au ere t  al.
 limiting_surface brightness_of $\mu_g \sim 25.5_\rm ~mag~_arcsec^{-2}$),_but also_on_the spectroscopy of_(nominally) all galaxies_brighter than $r<17.77$ mag[^1]_(with effective surface_brightness_$\mu_e<24.5 \rm ~mag~ arcsec^{-2}$).\
The present “near-field cosmology” project makes use of the photometry and_the_spectroscopy provided_by_SDSS_much in the way astronomers_use telescopes in “service observing”_mode, but_counting on an almost unlimited amount of observing_time._By saying so_we wish to emphasize that, opposite to most SDSS_statistical analyzes that are based on_such large number_of_objects_that cannot be inspected_individually, the number of galaxies ($\sim$_4000) in the present study is_large enough to ensure statistical significance, but_not too large to prevent individual_inspection of all images and_spectra. The_Coma supercluster constitutes the ideal_bridge between the_near-field and_the high-$z$ cosmology.\
Several_modern studies based on hundreds of_thousands galaxies from_the SDSS in the local universe_(usually_$0.05<z<0.2$) address environmental_issues_by_quantifying the_dependence of galaxy_structural_and photometric_parameters_from the local galaxy density. The_density_around each galaxy is computed counting galaxies_in cylinders of given_projected_radius and depth in_the redshift space. Most studies_adopt 2 Mpc and 500 $\rm_km s^{-1}$_(e.g. Kauffmann_et al. 2004) or 1 Mpc and 1000 $\rm km s^{-1}$_(e.g. Hogg et al. 2004), as_a compromise for detecting_structures intermediate_between_large groups and_small_clusters. It_is not easy however to visualize what_type of_structures are found by these automatic_algorithms. The present study_gives_the opportunity to reciprocally calibrate structures_that are seen individually in the_CS with those that are_detected_by_statistical means.\
It is well know_that the SDSS pipelines have not_been designed for_extracting parameters of extended nearby galaxies, which_results_in problems in creating reliable low-redshift_catalogs,_due to: 1) “shredding” of large_galaxies_in_multiple pieces leading to wrong_magnitude determinations. 2) slight (20%) underestimate_of the brightness of galaxies larger than $r_{50}\sim 20"$_due to the_way the photometric pipeline determines_the_median_sky, biasing the sky brightness near large extended galaxies, as_reported by_Mandelbaum et al._(2005), Lauer et al.