 relatively light sparticles, if the present deviation from the SM of $2.6\sigma$ persists.

At large ${\mbox{$ \tan\beta~ $}}$ a global fit including both $b\to X_s\gamma$ and $a_\mu$ as well as the present Higgs limit of 113.5 GeV leaves a quite large region in the CMSSM parameter space. Here we left the trilinear coupling to be a free parameter, which affects both the Higgs limit constraint and the [$b  \to  X_s \gamma~ $]{}constraint, but in opposite ways, so that the preferred region is similar for the no-scale models with $A_0=0$ and models which leave $A_0$ free.

The 95% lower limit on $m_{1/2}$ is $ 300$ GeV (see Figs. \[f6\]+\[f7\]), which implies that the lightest chargino (neutralino) is above 240(120) GeV. The 95% upper limit on $m_{1/2}$ is determined by the lower limit on $a_\mu^{SUSY}$ and therefor depends on (see Fig. \[f2\]). For =35(50) one finds $m_{1/2}\leq 610(720)$ GeV, which implies that the lightest chargino is below 500(590) GeV and the lightest neutralino is below 260(310) GeV.

Acknowledgements {#acknowledgements.unnumbered}
================

D.K. would like to thank the Heisenberg-Landau Programme, RFBR grant \# 99-02-16650 and DFG grant \# 436/RUS/113/626 for financial support and the Karlsruhe University for hospitality during completion of this work.

[99]{} H. N. Brown et al., hep-ex/0102017, Phys. Rev. Lett. [**86**]{} (2001) 2227. F. J. Yndurain, hep-ph/0102231. A. Czarnecki and W. Marchiano, hep-ph/0102122. U. Chattopadhyay and P. Nath, hep-ph/0102157;\
T. Ibrahim, U. Chattopadhyay, P. Nath hep-ph/0102324. L. Everett, G. L. Kane, S. Rigolin and L.Wang, hep
relatively light sparticles, if the present deviation from the SM of $ 2.6\sigma$ persists. 

 At large $ { \mbox{$ \tan\beta~ $ } } $ a ball-shaped paroxysm including both $ b\to X_s\gamma$ and $ a_\mu$ as well as the present Higgs terminus ad quem of 113.5 GeV leaves a quite big region in the CMSSM parameter outer space. Here we left the trilinear coupling to be a complimentary parameter, which affects both the Higgs terminus ad quem constraint and the [ $ b   \to   X_s \gamma~ $ ] { } constraint, but in opposite ways, so that the preferable region is similar for the no - scale models with $ A_0=0 $ and models which exit $ A_0 $ free. 

 The 95% lower limit on $ m_{1/2}$ is $ 300 $ GeV (learn Figs. \[f6\]+\[f7\ ]), which implies that the lightest chargino (neutralino) is above 240(120) GeV. The 95% upper limit on $ m_{1/2}$ is determined by the low limit on $ a_\mu^{SUSY}$ and therefor depends on (see Fig. \[f2\ ]). For = 35(50) one finds $ m_{1/2}\leq 610(720)$ GeV, which implies that the light chargino is below 500(590) GeV and the lightest neutralino is below 260(310) GeV. 

 Acknowledgements { # acknowledgements.unnumbered } 
 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 

 D.K. would like to thank the Heisenberg - Landau Programme, RFBR grant \ # 99 - 02 - 16650 and DFG grant \ # 436 / RUS/113/626 for fiscal documentation and the Karlsruhe University for hospitality during completion of this work. 

 [ 99 ] { } H. N. Brown et al. , hep - ex/0102017, Phys. Rev. Lett. [ * * 86 * * ] { } (2001) 2227. F. J. Yndurain, hep - ph/0102231. A. Czarnecki and W. Marchiano, hep - ph/0102122. U. Chattopadhyay and P. Nath, hep - ph/0102157;\ 
 T. Ibrahim, U. Chattopadhyay, P. Nath hep - ph/0102324. L. Everett, G. L. Kane, S. Rigolin and L.Wang, hep
 repatively light sparticler, if the presenj eeviatmon froj the SM of $2.6\sigma$ persists.

At large ${\muox{$ \ran\beuc~ $}}$ a global fit incljding botj $b\to X_s\tamme$ and $a_\mu$ as well as the presehb Higys limit of 113.5 GeV leaves a xuite large reciun in the CMSSM parameter space. Here re left tje trilinear cjuplpnd to be a free parameter, which affects both tie Higgs limit vonstraint and the [$b  \to  D_s \gwmma~ $]{}constraint, buh in opposijs wwts, so that tfe preferrtd region is similar for the no-scale models with $A_0=0$ and modgla avich leave $E_0$ free.

Nhe 95% lower limit on $m_{1/2}$ is $ 300$ GrV (see Figs. \[f6\]+\[f7\]), whmch umplies that the lighvest chargino (neutrajino) is atore 240(120) GeV. The 95% upper linir on $k_{1/2}$ is detdemived bb tge lowfr mimit on $a_\ju^{SUSY}$ and rherefor depends on (sqv Fig. \[f2\]). For =35(50) kne figdf $m_{1/2}\leq 610(720)$ GeV, which implies that the lighuest dhargino is below 500(590) GeV qnd the lightest neuttalino is felow 260(310) GeV.

Acknowledgements {#acknowledgements.unnumbared}
================

D.I. wobod liyw ho thank the Heisenberg-Landau Programme, RFBR ddamt \# 99-02-16650 and DFG grakt \# 436/RUS/113/626 for financoap xopport and the Karlsxhhs University for hlspitalyty dyring comkletipn of this work.

[99]{} H. N. Brown er al., hep-ex/0102017, Pkys. Rev. Lett. [**86**]{} (2001) 2227. F. J. Yudurain, hep-pk/0102231. A. Czsrnecli and W. Marchiano, hep-pk/0102122. U. Chzttopadhyay and P. Naff, hep-ph/0102157;\
T. Ibrahim, U. Bhatdopadhyay, P. Nath hep-ph/0102324. L. Ederett, G. O. Kaue, S. Rigulin and L.Rang, hep
relatively light sparticles, if the present deviation SM $2.6\sigma$ persists. large ${\mbox{$ \tan\beta~ both X_s\gamma$ and $a_\mu$ well as the Higgs limit of 113.5 GeV leaves quite large region in the CMSSM parameter space. Here we left the trilinear to be a free parameter, which affects both the Higgs limit constraint and [$b X_s $]{}constraint, in opposite ways, so that the preferred region is similar for the no-scale models with $A_0=0$ models which leave $A_0$ free. The 95% lower on $m_{1/2}$ is $ GeV (see Figs. \[f6\]+\[f7\]), which that lightest chargino is 240(120) The 95% upper on $m_{1/2}$ is determined by the lower limit on $a_\mu^{SUSY}$ and therefor depends on (see Fig. \[f2\]). =35(50) one 610(720)$ GeV, implies the chargino is below and the lightest neutralino is below {#acknowledgements.unnumbered} ================ D.K. would like to thank the Programme, RFBR \# 99-02-16650 and DFG grant \# for financial support and the Karlsruhe University for during completion of this work. [99]{} H. N. Brown et al., hep-ex/0102017, Phys. Rev. Lett. 2227. F. J. Yndurain, A. Czarnecki and Marchiano, U. and Nath, hep-ph/0102157;\ Ibrahim, U. Chattopadhyay, P. Nath hep-ph/0102324. L. Everett, G. L. Kane, Rigolin and L.Wang, hep
 relatively light sparticles, If the preseNt devIatIon FrOm thE SM oF $2.6\sigma$ persists.

aT larGe ${\mbox{$ \tan\beta~ $}}$ a global fiT inclUdINg boTH $b\To X_s\gAmma$ and $A_\Mu$ AS WelL aS tHe pReSEnT HiggS liMit of 113.5 Gev leaves a quIte LaRge region in tHE CmSSM parameTer Space. Here we lEft The triLiNeaR CouplIng To be a Free paRAmeter, Which affeCtS Both thE higgs liMIT cOnstRaint and the [$b  \to  X_s \gAMmA~ $]{}Constraint, but iN opposItE WaYS, So tHat The preferrEd RegioN Is similAR fOR THe nO-Scale models wiTh $A_0=0$ and modelS WhiCh leavE $A_0$ FreE.

the 95% lowEr limIt ON $m_{1/2}$ iS $ 300$ GeV (see Figs. \[F6\]+\[f7\]), whIch implieS that tHE lighteST chargiNo (neutRalIno) Is abOVe 240(120) gev. ThE 95% uPPer LImIt oN $M_{1/2}$ is DeterminEd By The loWer lIMIT On $a_\mU^{SUsY}$ anD therEfor depends on (See fig. \[f2\]). fOr =35(50) oNe finDs $m_{1/2}\leQ 610(720)$ GeV, WhIch imPlies tHat thE lIghtest chargino Is beLow 500(590) GeV and The LiGhtEsT neutRAlino iS beLow 260(310) geV.

AcknOwledgeMEntS {#aCKNOwLedgements.unnumberEd}
================

d.k. WoUld like tO thank THe heISenberg-LAnDau progRAMme, RFbR grANt \# 99-02-16650 And DFG grAnt \# 436/RUS/113/626 FOr FiNancial SuPport aNd The karLsruhE univErsity For hospiTalitY During completiON of this work.

[99]{} H. N. bRoWN Et AL., hep-Ex/0102017, PHys. Rev. Lett. [**86**]{} (2001) 2227. F. j. YndURain, Hep-pH/0102231. a. CZarNEcki aNd W. MaRcHIaNO, hep-ph/0102122. U. ChattopadhyaY aNd P. NatH, hep-pH/0102157;\
T. Ibrahim, U. ChaTtopadhyay, p. nATh hep-ph/0102324. L. everETt, g. l. Kane, S. Rigolin aNd L.WaNg, hep
 relatively light sparticl es, if the  pres ent  de vi atio n fr om the SM of $ 2 .6\s igma$ persists.

At la rge $ {\ m box{ $  \ tan\b eta~ $} } $a glo ba lfit  i n cl uding  bo th $b\t o X_s\gamm a$an d $a_\mu$ as we ll as thepre sent Higgs l imi t of 1 13 .5G eV le ave s a q uite l a rge re gion in t he CMSSMp aramete r sp ace.  Here we left the tr i linear couplin g to b ea  f r e e p ara meter, whi ch  affe c ts both th e H igg s  limit constr aint and th e  [$ b  \to  X_s \gamma ~ $]{ }c o nst raint, butin o pposite w ays, s o  that t h e prefe rred r egi onis s i mi la r f or the no -sc a lemodels w it h$A_0= 0$ a n d m odel s w hich  leav e $A_0$ free. 

T he 9 5 % l owerlimit  on$m _{1/2 }$ is$ 300 $GeV (see Figs.\[f6 \]+\[f7\] ),wh ich  i mplie s  thatthe  li ghtestchargin o  (n eu t r a li no) is above 240(1 20 ) Ge V. The 9 5% upp e rli m it on $m _{ 1/2 }$ i s deter mine d  b y the lo wer li m it  o n $a_\m u^ {SUSY} $and  th erefo r  dep ends o n (see F ig. \ [ f2\]). For =35 ( 50) one finds $m _ { 1/ 2 }\le q 6 10(720)$ Ge V, w h ichimpl i es  th a t the  ligh te s tc hargino is below 50 0( 590) G eV an d the lightes t neutrali n o is below  260 ( 31 0 ) GeV.

Acknow ledge ments {#ac k nowledge ments .unnumbe red}
==== = = ======== ==
D. K.wou l d  l ike to thankt h e He is enberg- Lan dau Pro gra mme , R FBR  g rant \# 9 9-02-166 50  a nd  D FGgrant \# 436/R US /11 3/ 626  forf inanci al su ppor tan d  th e Karls r uh e Univ er si ty f orho spita lity dur ing com pletion o f t h is w or k. 

[99]{ } H. N. Brown  e t al., hep -e x/0 102017 , Phys. Re v. Lett. [**86**]{} (20 0 1) 2227 . F . J.Yndu rain, hep -ph /01022 31. A. Cza rnecki  andW.  Ma r c hiano , he p-p h/ 0102122. U . Cha ttopa dh yayand P.Nath, hep-ph/01021 5 7;\ 
T. Ibrahim,U.Chat t o pa dhy a y, P.Na t h h e p -ph/0102324. L.  Everett,G. L.  Kane, S.R igo li n and L .Wang,hep
 relatively_light sparticles,_if the present deviation_from the_SM_of $2.6\sigma$_persists.

At_large ${\mbox{$ \tan\beta~_$}}$ a global_fit including both $b\to_X_s\gamma$ and $a_\mu$_as_well as the present Higgs limit of 113.5 GeV leaves a quite large region_in_the CMSSM_parameter_space._Here we left the trilinear_coupling to be a free_parameter, which_affects both the Higgs limit constraint and the_[$b_ \to _X_s \gamma~ $]{}constraint, but in opposite ways, so that_the preferred region is similar for_the no-scale models_with_$A_0=0$_and models which leave_$A_0$ free.

The 95% lower limit on_$m_{1/2}$ is $ 300$ GeV (see_Figs. \[f6\]+\[f7\]), which implies that the lightest_chargino (neutralino) is above 240(120) GeV._The 95% upper limit on_$m_{1/2}$ is_determined by the lower limit_on $a_\mu^{SUSY}$ and_therefor depends_on (see Fig._\[f2\]). For =35(50) one finds $m_{1/2}\leq_610(720)$ GeV, which_implies that the lightest chargino is_below_500(590) GeV and_the_lightest_neutralino is_below 260(310) GeV.

Acknowledgements_{#acknowledgements.unnumbered}
================

D.K._would like_to_thank the Heisenberg-Landau Programme, RFBR grant_\#_99-02-16650 and DFG grant \# 436/RUS/113/626 for_financial support and the_Karlsruhe_University for hospitality during_completion of this work.

[99]{} H._N. Brown et al., hep-ex/0102017, Phys._Rev. Lett._[**86**]{} (2001)_2227. F. J. Yndurain, hep-ph/0102231. A. Czarnecki and W. Marchiano, hep-ph/0102122._U. Chattopadhyay and P. Nath, hep-ph/0102157;\
T._Ibrahim, U. Chattopadhyay, P._Nath hep-ph/0102324._L._Everett, G. L._Kane,_S. Rigolin_and L.Wang, hep