 It implies $$f'_{i_0}\in \sum_{j\neq i_0}\mathcal{O}f'_j+\mathcal{O}f,$$ which is impossible in the case of an isolated singularity $f$.

If $E=1$, considering the leading term in $\bar{s}$ in the relation (\[eq3.3\]), we obtain that $1$ belongs to the maximal ideal of $W$, a contradiction.$\square$

*Remark :* After the preceding lemma, we have $\beta_1>n+1.$ Since in the smooth case, $\beta_1=n+1$, we conclude that $\beta_1$ characterizes the smoothness (among germs for which $0$ is at most an isolated singularity).

We are now ready to characterize the quasi-homogeneity. If $f$ is quasi homogeneous, the good operator has degree $1$ in $s$, is of the form $s-\theta$ with $\theta(f)=f$. From the resolution of $\textrm{bigr}N$ we constructed in Section 3.1, we deduce that $\textrm{ann}_W \delta$ is minimally generated by $f,(f'_i\partial_t),(f'_i\partial_{x_j}-f'_j\partial_{x_i}),s-\theta.$ The corresponding shifts for the filtration $F$ are respectively $0,1,1,1$.

If now $f$ is not quasi homogeneous, then $S_L$ has degree in $s$ greater than $1$. Indeed, suppose on the contrary that there exists a good operator anihilating $f^s$ of the form $s+P$ with $P=u+\theta$, $u\in\mathcal{O}$ and $\theta$ a vector field. We have $$0=(s+P)f^s=(s(1+\theta(f)\frac{1}{f})+u)f^s.$$ Substituting $s=0$, we get $u=0$. So $\theta(f)\frac{1}{f}=-1$ and $f\in J(f)$. This implies that $f$ is quasi homogeneous by [@saito71].

\[prop20\] $f$ is quasi homogeneous if and only if $\textrm{reg}_F N=0$.

#### Proof

If $f$ is not quasi homogeneous,
It implies $ $ f'_{i_0}\in \sum_{j\neq i_0}\mathcal{O}f'_j+\mathcal{O}f,$$ which is impossible in the case of an isolated singularity $ f$. 

 If $ E=1 $, considering the lead condition in $ \bar{s}$ in the relation (\[eq3.3\ ]), we obtain that $ 1 $ belongs to the maximal ideal of $ W$, a contradiction.$\square$ 

 * Remark :* After the precede lemma, we have $ \beta_1 > n+1.$ Since in the smooth character, $ \beta_1 = n+1 $, we reason that $ \beta_1 $ characterizes the smoothness (among germs for which $ 0 $ is at most an isolated singularity). 

 We are now ready to qualify the quasi - homogeneity. If $ f$ is quasi homogeneous, the good operator has degree $ 1 $ in $ s$, is of the form $ s-\theta$ with $ \theta(f)=f$. From the settlement of $ \textrm{bigr}N$ we constructed in Section 3.1, we deduce that $ \textrm{ann}_W \delta$ is minimally generated by $ f,(f'_i\partial_t),(f'_i\partial_{x_j}-f'_j\partial_{x_i}),s-\theta.$ The corresponding shifts for the filtration $ F$ are respectively $ 0,1,1,1$. 

 If nowadays $ f$ is not quasi homogeneous, then $ S_L$ has degree in $ s$ greater than $ 1$. Indeed, suppose on the reverse that there exists a good hustler anihilating $ f^s$ of the form $ s+P$ with $ P = u+\theta$, $ u\in\mathcal{O}$ and $ \theta$ a vector airfield. We have $ $ 0=(s+P)f^s=(s(1+\theta(f)\frac{1}{f})+u)f^s.$$ substitute $ s=0 $, we get $ u=0$. So $ \theta(f)\frac{1}{f}=-1 $ and $ f\in J(f)$. This implies that $ f$ is quasi homogeneous by [ @saito71 ]. 

 \[prop20\ ] $ f$ is quasi homogeneous if and entirely if $ \textrm{reg}_F N=0$. 

 # # # # Proof 

 If $ f$ is not quasi homogeneous,
 It implies $$f'_{i_0}\in \sum_{j\neq i_0}\mxthcal{O}f'_j+\mathcal{O}f,$$ whirh is ijpossibld in the case of an isolated sungulqrity $f$.

If $E=1$, considerine the leafing tern in $\var{s}$ in thx relation (\[eq3.3\]), sc obtcii that $1$ belongs to the mafimal ideal of $W$, a contradiction.$\square$

*Remark :* After tre precrdlng lemma, we hwve $\nqta_1>n+1.$ Since in the smooth case, $\beta_1=n+1$, we concluve that $\beta_1$ chsracterizes the smoothness (amojg germs for which $0$ is at mosj an usolated sineularity).

We are now reasy to characterize the quasi-homugenenty. If $f$ is qyasl homogeneouw, the good operator has dagree $1$ on $s$, is of the focm $s-\rheta$ with $\theta(f)=f$. Frmm the resolution jf $\textrm{tiyr}N$ we constructed in Swctiot 3.1, wa deayce thzt $\tsxtrm{ajn}_W \delta$ is jinimally gwnerated by $f,(f'_i\partoaj_n),(g'_i\partial_{x_j}-f'_n\partiwl_{v_i}),s-\theta.$ The corresponding shifts for tve riltration $F$ are respecrively $0,1,1,1$.

If now $f$ is noj quasi hoiogeneous, then $S_L$ has degree in $s$ greater than $1$. Itdeed, rupkowe on rhf contrary that there exists a good operator whinikating $f^s$ of tme form $s+P$ with $P=u+\yhfts$, $u\in\mathcal{O}$ xnd $\thzfa$ a vector field. We have $$0=(s+K)f^s=(s(1+\thwta(f)\frac{1}{f})+t)f^s.$$ Xubstituting $s=0$, we get $u=0$. So $\rheta(f)\frac{1}{f}=-1$ cnd $f\in J(f)$. This implizs that $f$ is quaxi hokogeneous by [@saito71].

\[prop20\] $y$ is qhasi homogejeous if zvd only if $\textro{ren}_F T=0$.

#### Proof

If $f$ is not quasi hjmogeneouw,
It implies $$f'_{i_0}\in \sum_{j\neq i_0}\mathcal{O}f'_j+\mathcal{O}f,$$ which is the of an singularity $f$. If in in the relation we obtain that belongs to the maximal ideal of a contradiction.$\square$ *Remark :* After the preceding lemma, we have $\beta_1>n+1.$ Since in smooth case, $\beta_1=n+1$, we conclude that $\beta_1$ characterizes the smoothness (among germs for $0$ at an singularity). We are now ready to characterize the quasi-homogeneity. If $f$ is quasi homogeneous, the good has degree $1$ in $s$, is of the $s-\theta$ with $\theta(f)=f$. From resolution of $\textrm{bigr}N$ we constructed Section we deduce $\textrm{ann}_W is generated by $f,(f'_i\partial_t),(f'_i\partial_{x_j}-f'_j\partial_{x_i}),s-\theta.$ corresponding shifts for the filtration $F$ are respectively $0,1,1,1$. If now $f$ is not quasi homogeneous, then has degree greater than Indeed, on contrary that there good operator anihilating $f^s$ of the $P=u+\theta$, $u\in\mathcal{O}$ and $\theta$ a vector field. We $$0=(s+P)f^s=(s(1+\theta(f)\frac{1}{f})+u)f^s.$$ Substituting we get $u=0$. So $\theta(f)\frac{1}{f}=-1$ and J(f)$. This implies that $f$ is quasi homogeneous [@saito71]. \[prop20\] $f$ is quasi homogeneous if and only if $\textrm{reg}_F N=0$. #### Proof If not quasi homogeneous,
 It implies $$f'_{i_0}\in \sum_{j\neq i_0}\mathCal{O}f'_j+\mathCal{O}f,$$ WhiCh iS iMposSiblE in the case of an ISolaTed singularity $f$.

If $E=1$, consIderiNg THe leADiNg terM in $\bar{s}$ IN tHE RelAtIoN (\[eq3.3\]), We OBtAin thAt $1$ bElongs tO the maximaL idEaL of $W$, a contradICtIon.$\square$

*REmaRk :* After the prEceDing leMmA, we HAve $\beTa_1>n+1.$ since In the sMOoth caSe, $\beta_1=n+1$, we CoNClude tHAt $\beta_1$ cHARaCterIzes the smoothness (AMoNG germs for which $0$ Is at moSt AN iSOLatEd sIngularity).

we Are noW Ready to CHaRACTerIZe the quasi-homOgeneity. If $f$ IS quAsi homOgEneOUs, the gOod opErATor Has degree $1$ in $S$, is oF the form $s-\Theta$ wITh $\theta(F)=F$. From thE resolUtiOn oF $\texTRm{BiGr}N$ We COnsTRuCteD In SEction 3.1, we DeDuCe thaT $\texTRM{ANn}_W \dEltA$ is mInimaLly generated bY $f,(f'_I\parTIal_T),(f'_i\paRtial_{X_j}-f'_j\PaRtial_{X_i}),s-\theTa.$ The CoRresponding shifTs foR the filtrAtiOn $f$ arE rEspecTIvely $0,1,1,1$.

IF noW $f$ iS not quaSi homogENeoUs, THEN $S_l$ has degree in $s$ greatEr THAn $1$. indeed, suPpose oN ThE cONtrary thAt TheRe exISTs a goOd opERaTor anihiLating $F^S$ oF tHe form $s+p$ wIth $P=u+\tHeTa$, $u\In\mAthcaL{o}$ and $\Theta$ a Vector fiEld. We HAve $$0=(s+P)f^s=(s(1+\theta(f)\FRac{1}{f})+u)f^s.$$ SubstiTUtING $s=0$, WE get $U=0$. So $\Theta(f)\frac{1}{f}=-1$ And $f\IN J(f)$. THis iMPlIes THat $f$ iS quasI hOMoGEneous by [@saito71].

\[prop20\] $f$ iS qUasi hoMogenEous if and only If $\textrm{reG}_f n=0$.

#### proof

If $f$ Is noT QuASi homogeneous,
 It implies $$f'_{i_0}\in\sum_{j\ne q i_0 }\m ath ca l{O} f'_j +\mathcal{O}f, $ $ wh ich is impossible in t he ca se of a n  i solat ed sing u la r i ty$f $. 

I f$ E= 1$, c ons idering  the leadi ngte rm in $\bar{ s }$  in the re lat ion (\[eq3.3 \]) , we o bt ain that$1$  belo ngs to the ma ximal ide al of $W$ ,  a cont r a di ctio n.$\square$

*Rem a rk :* After the p recedi ng le m m a,wehave $\bet a_ 1>n+1 . $ Since in t h e s m ooth case, $\ beta_1=n+1$ ,  we  concl ud e t h at $\b eta_1 $c har acterizes t he s moothness  (amon g  germsf or whic h $0$isatmost an  i sol at e d s i ng ula r ity ).

We a re  n ow re adyt o c hara cte rize  thequasi-homogen eit y. I f  $f $ isquasi  hom og eneou s, the  good  o perator has deg ree$1$ in $s $,is  of  t he fo r m $s-\ the ta$  with $ \theta( f )=f $. F r om  the resolution of  $ \ t ex trm{bigr }N$ we co ns t ructed i nSec tion 3 .1, w e de d uc e that $ \textr m {a nn }_W \de lt a$ ismi nim all y gen e rate d by $ f,(f'_i\ parti a l_t),(f'_i\par t ial_{x_j}-f'_ j \p a r ti a l_{x _i} ),s-\theta. $ Th e  cor resp o nd ing shift s for  t h ef iltration $F$ are r es pectiv ely $ 0,1,1,1$.

If  now $f$ i s n ot quasi  hom o ge n eous, then $S_ L$ ha s degree i n  $s$ gre aterthan $1$ . Indeed, s uppose o n t hecon tra r y  t hat there exi s t s ago od oper ato r anihi lat ing  $f ^s$  o f the for m $s+P$wi th  $ P= u+\ theta $ , $u\in\ ma thc al {O} $ and $\thet a$ avect or  f i eld . We ha v e$ $ 0=(s +P )f ^s=( s(1 +\ theta (f)\ f rac {1}{f}) +u)f^s.$$  Su b stit ut in g $s=0$ , we get $u=0 $.  So $\thet a( f)\ frac{1 } { f}=-1$ a nd $f\in J(f)$. This im p lies th at$f$ i s qu asi homog ene ous by  [@ s aito71 ].

\[ prop2 0\ ] $ f $  is q u a si  ho mo geneous if a ndonlyif  $\t extrm{r eg}_F N=0$.

####P roo f

If $f$ isnot  qua s i  h omo g en e ous ,
 It_implies $$f'_{i_0}\in_\sum_{j\neq i_0}\mathcal{O}f'_j+\mathcal{O}f,$$ which is_impossible in_the_case of_an_isolated singularity $f$.

If_$E=1$, considering the_leading term in $\bar{s}$_in the relation_(\[eq3.3\]),_we obtain that $1$ belongs to the maximal ideal of $W$, a contradiction.$\square$

*Remark :*_After_the preceding_lemma,_we_have $\beta_1>n+1.$ Since in the_smooth case, $\beta_1=n+1$, we conclude_that $\beta_1$_characterizes the smoothness (among germs for which $0$_is_at most an_isolated singularity).

We are now ready to characterize the quasi-homogeneity._If $f$ is quasi homogeneous, the_good operator has_degree_$1$_in $s$, is of_the form $s-\theta$ with $\theta(f)=f$. From_the resolution of $\textrm{bigr}N$ we constructed_in Section 3.1, we deduce that $\textrm{ann}_W_\delta$ is minimally generated by $f,(f'_i\partial_t),(f'_i\partial_{x_j}-f'_j\partial_{x_i}),s-\theta.$_The corresponding shifts for the_filtration $F$_are respectively $0,1,1,1$.

If now $f$_is not quasi_homogeneous, then_$S_L$ has degree_in $s$ greater than $1$. Indeed,_suppose on the_contrary that there exists a good_operator_anihilating $f^s$ of_the_form_$s+P$ with_$P=u+\theta$, $u\in\mathcal{O}$ and_$\theta$_a vector_field._We have $$0=(s+P)f^s=(s(1+\theta(f)\frac{1}{f})+u)f^s.$$ Substituting $s=0$, we_get_$u=0$. So $\theta(f)\frac{1}{f}=-1$ and $f\in J(f)$. This_implies that $f$ is_quasi_homogeneous by [@saito71].

\[prop20\] $f$_is quasi homogeneous if and_only if $\textrm{reg}_F N=0$.

#### Proof

If $f$_is not_quasi homogeneous,