 $\tilde{\alpha}$ is $\tilde{\alpha}= \alpha_{+} \left|  + \right\rangle \left\langle + \right| \   \  + \  \  \alpha_{-} \left|  - \right\rangle \left\langle - \right| \   \  + \  \  \alpha_{z} \left|  z \right\rangle \left\langle z \right|$. Representing the damping tensor in the $\left\{ \left|  x\right\rangle,\: \left|  y\right\rangle,\:  \left|  z\right\rangle \right\} $ coordinate basis yields $\alpha\equiv \tilde{\alpha}_{xx} = \tilde{\alpha}_{yy} = (\alpha_{+} + \alpha_{-})/2 $, $\tilde{\alpha}_{zz}= \alpha_z$, $\tilde{\alpha}_{yx}=\tilde{\alpha}_{xy}=0$, and $\alpha_{+}=\alpha_{-}$. The last equality results from real tensor coefficients. However, $\alpha_{zz}$ cannot be determined uniquely from the energy dissipation formula $\dot{E}\propto \dot{\mathbf{m}}^T \tilde{\alpha} \dot{\mathbf{m}}$ because $\dot{\mathbf{m}}$ is perpendicular to the z-axis. Therefore, $\alpha_{zz}$ has no physical significance and the energy dissipation is governed by the single parameter $\alpha$. For an infinite system, this damping parameter does not depend on the specific direction of the magnetization, i.e., it is isotropic because the symmetry of the Hamiltonian is not directly linked to the crystallographic axes of the underlying crystal lattice (when the cubic symmetry term in Eq.  is disregarded). For a finite system, the shape of the system induces anisotropy in the magnetization damping. This effect is illustrated in Fig. \[fig:Fig2\], which plots the effective damping in Eq.  as a function of the magnetization directions for different system shapes. When the cross-section of the conductor is deformed from a regular shape to the shape of a thinner system, the anisotropy of the damping changes. The magnetization damping varies from a minimum value of around 0.004 to a maximum value of 0.006, e.g., the anisotropy is around 50%. The relaxation process is largest along the axis where the ballistic leads are connected, i.e., the y-axis. This shape anisotropy is about four- to five-times stronger than the anisotropy
$ \tilde{\alpha}$ is $ \tilde{\alpha}= \alpha_{+ } \left|   + \right\rangle \left\langle + \right| \    \   + \   \   \alpha_{- } \left|   - \right\rangle \left\langle - \right| \    \   + \   \   \alpha_{z } \left|   z \right\rangle \left\langle z \right|$. Representing the damping tensor in the $ \left\ { \left|   x\right\rangle,\: \left|   y\right\rangle,\:   \left|   z\right\rangle \right\ } $ coordinate basis yields $ \alpha\equiv \tilde{\alpha}_{xx } = \tilde{\alpha}_{yy } = (\alpha_{+ } + \alpha_{-})/2 $, $ \tilde{\alpha}_{zz}= \alpha_z$, $ \tilde{\alpha}_{yx}=\tilde{\alpha}_{xy}=0 $, and $ \alpha_{+}=\alpha_{-}$. The final equality result from real tensor coefficients. However, $ \alpha_{zz}$ cannot be determined uniquely from the department of energy dissipation formula $ \dot{E}\propto \dot{\mathbf{m}}^T \tilde{\alpha } \dot{\mathbf{m}}$ because $ \dot{\mathbf{m}}$ is perpendicular to the omega - bloc. Therefore, $ \alpha_{zz}$ has no physical significance and the energy waste is governed by the single argument $ \alpha$. For an infinite system, this damping parameter does not depend on the specific direction of the magnetization, i.e., it is isotropic because the symmetry of the Hamiltonian is not immediately linked to the crystallographic axes of the underlying quartz glass lattice (when the cubic symmetry term in Eq.    is disregarded). For a finite system, the human body of the system induces anisotropy in the magnetization damping. This effect is illustrated in Fig.   \[fig: Fig2\ ], which plat the effective damping in Eq.    as a function of the magnetization directions for different system shapes. When the cross - section of the conductor is deformed from a regular shape to the shape of a thinner system, the anisotropy of the damping changes. The magnetization damping varies from a minimum value of around 0.004 to a maximal value of 0.006, for example, the anisotropy is around 50% . The relaxation process is largest along the bloc where the ballistic star are connected, i.e., the y - bloc. This shape anisotropy is approximately four- to five - times stronger than the anisotropy
 $\tipde{\alpha}$ is $\tilde{\alpha}= \aupha_{+} \left|  + \rigkr\ranglx \left\lzngle + \rkght| \   \  + \  \  \alpha_{-} \left|  - \cighr\rangoe \left\langle - \right| \   \  + \  \  \wlpha_{z} \lwft|  z \right\ranjme \left\langle d \rigkt|$. Representing jhe damping densor in the $\newt\{ \left|  x\right\rangle,\: \left|  y\right\randle,\:  \legt|  z\right\rangle \rigne\} $ ckordinate basis yields $\alpha\equiv \filde{\alkha}_{xx} = \tilde{\alpha}_{yu} = (\alpha_{+} + \alpha_{-})/2 $, $\tilde{\alphw}_{zz}= \wlpha_z$, $\tilde{\alpha}_{yd}=\tilde{\alpha}_{zy}=0$, age $\alpha_{+}=\alpha_{-}$. The last tqbality resumts from real tensor coefficiengs. Hocever, $\alpha_{ev}$ cajtot be detecmined uniquely from the etergy dossipation forkule $\dor{E}\propto \dot{\mathbf{m}}^T \vilde{\alpha} \dot{\mathbf{i}}$ because $\dkt{\mathbf{m}}$ is perpwneiculdr tm thd z-abis. Tiersfore, $\wlpia_{zz}$ has no physical sugnificance and the egvtgy dissipatjon is gjverned by the single parameter $\alpha$. Fmr zn infinite system, this damping parameter dogs not depqnd on the specific direction of the magnetizatiot, i.e., mt is ifurrlpic because the symmetry of the Hamiltonian ya mon directly linked to the cryxtwlkjgraphic axes of thz uhderlying crystal pattice (when the cubis sykmetry term in Eq.  is disregqrded). For a yinute system, the sha'e of the syrtem induves anisotropy in the mcgnetiaation damplng. This swfect is illustrxtec hn Fig. \[fig:Fig2\], which plots tre effectmve dcmping iv Eq.  as a sunction ov the magnetization direftiond xor differfnt system shapes. When the cross-section of thg cmndlctor is beformcd from a regulwr shape to thg shape oy a thknner systvm, the anmsotropy of ehe damping cvwnges. The majnetizatijn dqmpibg varidr from a minimim value of around 0.004 to a maximum valuc of 0.006, s.g., the anisotro'v us around 50%. The telxxaeiln pwmcess is larcest alumg thd axis wherc tfe bsllistic leads are cmnnedted, i.e., the y-axis. Yhls shape qnisotro[y is about fpur- to five-times surongec than the snifotropy
$\tilde{\alpha}$ is $\tilde{\alpha}= \alpha_{+} \left| + \right\rangle \right| \ + \ \alpha_{-} \left| \ + \ \ \left| z \right\rangle z \right|$. Representing the damping tensor the $\left\{ \left| x\right\rangle,\: \left| y\right\rangle,\: \left| z\right\rangle \right\} $ coordinate basis yields \tilde{\alpha}_{xx} = \tilde{\alpha}_{yy} = (\alpha_{+} + \alpha_{-})/2 $, $\tilde{\alpha}_{zz}= \alpha_z$, $\tilde{\alpha}_{yx}=\tilde{\alpha}_{xy}=0$, and $\alpha_{+}=\alpha_{-}$. last results real coefficients. However, $\alpha_{zz}$ cannot be determined uniquely from the energy dissipation formula $\dot{E}\propto \dot{\mathbf{m}}^T \tilde{\alpha} \dot{\mathbf{m}}$ $\dot{\mathbf{m}}$ is perpendicular to the z-axis. Therefore, $\alpha_{zz}$ no physical significance and energy dissipation is governed by single $\alpha$. For infinite this parameter does not on the specific direction of the magnetization, i.e., it is isotropic because the symmetry of the Hamiltonian not directly the crystallographic of underlying lattice (when the term in Eq. is disregarded). For the shape of the system induces anisotropy in magnetization damping. effect is illustrated in Fig. \[fig:Fig2\], plots the effective damping in Eq. as a of the magnetization directions for different system shapes. When the cross-section of the conductor is a regular shape to shape of a system, anisotropy the changes. The damping varies from a minimum value of around 0.004 to a value of 0.006, e.g., the anisotropy is around 50%. The is along the axis the ballistic leads are i.e., y-axis. This shape anisotropy four- five-times anisotropy
 $\tilde{\alpha}$ is $\tilde{\alpha}= \alpHa_{+} \left|  + \righT\rangLe \lEft\LaNgle + \RighT| \   \  + \  \  \alpha_{-} \left|  - \righT\RangLe \left\langle - \right| \   \  + \  \  \alpha_{Z} \left|  Z \rIGht\rANgLe \lefT\langle Z \RiGHT|$. RePrEsEntInG ThE dampIng Tensor iN the $\left\{ \leFt|  x\RiGht\rangle,\: \lefT|  Y\rIght\rangle,\:  \LefT|  z\right\ranglE \riGht\} $ cooRdInaTE basiS yiElds $\aLpha\eqUIv \tildE{\alpha}_{xx} = \tIlDE{\alpha}_{YY} = (\alpha_{+} + \aLPHa_{-})/2 $, $\TildE{\alpha}_{zz}= \alpha_z$, $\tilDE{\aLPha}_{yx}=\tilde{\alphA}_{xy}=0$, and $\AlPHa_{+}=\ALPha_{-}$. the Last equaliTy ResulTS from reAL tENSOr cOEfficients. HowEver, $\alpha_{zz}$ CAnnOt be deTeRmiNEd uniqUely fRoM The Energy dissiPatiOn formula $\Dot{E}\prOPto \dot{\mAThbf{m}}^T \tIlde{\alPha} \Dot{\MathBF{m}}$ BeCauSe $\DOt{\mAThBf{m}}$ IS peRpendicuLaR tO the z-Axis. tHEREforE, $\alPha_{zZ}$ has nO physical signIfiCancE And The enErgy dIssiPaTion iS goverNed by ThE single parameteR $\alpHa$. For an inFinItE syStEm, thiS DampinG paRamEter doeS not depENd oN tHE SPeCific direction of thE mAGNeTization, I.e., it is ISoTrOPic becauSe The SymmETRy of tHe HaMIlTonian is Not dirECtLy Linked tO tHe crysTaLloGraPhic aXEs of The undErlying cRystaL Lattice (when the CUbic symmetry tERm IN eq.  IS disRegArded). For a fiNite SYsteM, the SHaPe oF The syStem iNdUCeS Anisotropy in the magnEtIzatioN dampIng. This effect Is illustraTED In Fig. \[fig:fig2\], wHIcH Plots the effectIve daMping in Eq.  aS A functioN of thE magnetiZation dirECTions for DifFerEnt SysTEM sHapes. When the cROSs-seCtIon of thE coNductor Is dEfoRmeD frOm A regular sHape to thE sHaPe Of A thInner SYstem, the AnIsoTrOpy Of the DAmping ChangEs. ThE mAgNEtiZation dAMpING varIeS fRom a MinImUm valUe of ARouNd 0.004 to a maXimum valuE of 0.006, E.G., the AnIsOtropy iS around 50%. The relAxAtion proceSs Is lArgest ALOng the axIs where the ballistic leadS Are connEctEd, i.e., tHe y-aXis. This shApe AnisotRopY Is abouT four- tO five-TiMes STRongeR THaN thE aNisotropy
 $\tilde{\alpha}$ is $\til de{\alpha} = \al pha _{+ }\lef t| + \right\rangl e  \le ft\langle + \right| \  \ +\   \\a lpha_ {-} \le f t| - \ ri gh t\r an g le  \lef t\l angle -  \right| \   \ + \  \  \al p ha _{z} \left | z \right\ran gle  \left \l ang l e z \ rig ht|$.  Repre s enting  the damp in g  tenso r  in the $ \l eft\ { \left|  x\right \ ra n gle,\: \left| y\rig ht \ ra n g le, \: \left|  z \r ight\ r angle \ r ig h t \ } $ coordinate ba sis yields$ \al pha\eq ui v \ t ilde{\ alpha }_ { xx}  = \tilde{\ alph a}_{yy} =  (\alp h a_{+} + \alpha_ {-})/2  $,  $\ tild e {\ al pha }_ { zz} =  \ alp h a_z $, $\til de {\ alpha }_{y x } = \ tild e{\ alph a}_{x y}=0$, and $\ alp ha_{ + }=\ alpha _{-}$ . Th elastequali ty re su lts from real t enso r coeffic ien ts . H ow ever, $\alph a_{ zz} $ canno t be de t erm in e d un iquely from the en er g y  d issipati on for m ul a$ \dot{E}\ pr opt o \d o t {\mat hbf{ m }} ^T \tild e{\alp h a}  \ dot{\ma th bf{m}} $bec aus e $\d o t{\m athbf{ m}}$ isperpe n dicular to the z-axis. There f or e ,  $ \ alph a_{ zz}$ has no  phy s ical  sig n if ica n ce an d the  e n er g y dissipation is go ve rned b y the  single param eter $\alp h a $ . For an  inf i ni t e system, this  damp ing parame t er doesnot d epend on  the spec i f ic direc tio n o f t hem a gn etization, i. e . , it  i s isotr opi c becau sethe  sy mme tr y of theHamilton ia nis  n otdirec t ly linke dtoth e c rysta l lograp hic a xesof  t h e u nderlyi n gc r ysta lla ttic e ( wh en th e cu b icsymmetr y term in  Eq .   is  d is regarde d). For a fin it e system,th e s hape o f the syst em induces anisotropy i n  the ma gne tizat iondamping.Thi s effe cti s illu strate d inFi g.\ [ fig:F i g 2\ ],wh ich plotst h e e ffect iv e da mping i n Eq.  as a functi o n o f the magneti zat iond i re cti o ns for  d i ffe r e nt system shape s. When th ec ro ss-section ofth e condu ctor is  defo r med fro m a regul ar shapeto  the s hap e of a thi nner sys tem, thea nisot r op y ofthe  dampi ng  ch anges . Them agn etiza tion d am ping v aries  f rom a mi nimum value of around 0 .004 t o a m axi mum value  of 0.0 06, e.g.,  the  anisotrop y i s a round  50 % . The  rel a xa tio n  proc essi s largest al ong t he  axis where t h e b allis tic leadsareconnected, i.e.,t he y-axis. Thi s sh a p e a nis o trop yis about four-  to  f i v e-timesst ronger than  the ani so t ropy
 $\tilde{\alpha}$_is $\tilde{\alpha}=_\alpha_{+} \left|  +_\right\rangle \left\langle_+_\right| \__ \ _+ \ _\  \alpha_{-} \left|_ - \right\rangle_\left\langle_- \right| \   \  + \  \  \alpha_{z} \left|__z \right\rangle_\left\langle_z_\right|$. Representing the damping tensor_in the $\left\{ \left| _x\right\rangle,\: \left|_ y\right\rangle,\:  \left|  z\right\rangle \right\} $_coordinate_basis yields $\alpha\equiv_\tilde{\alpha}_{xx} = \tilde{\alpha}_{yy} = (\alpha_{+} + \alpha_{-})/2 $, $\tilde{\alpha}_{zz}=_\alpha_z$, $\tilde{\alpha}_{yx}=\tilde{\alpha}_{xy}=0$, and $\alpha_{+}=\alpha_{-}$. The last_equality results from_real_tensor_coefficients. However, $\alpha_{zz}$ cannot_be determined uniquely from the energy_dissipation formula $\dot{E}\propto \dot{\mathbf{m}}^T \tilde{\alpha} \dot{\mathbf{m}}$_because $\dot{\mathbf{m}}$ is perpendicular to the z-axis._Therefore, $\alpha_{zz}$ has no physical significance_and the energy dissipation is_governed by_the single parameter $\alpha$. For_an infinite system,_this damping_parameter does not_depend on the specific direction of_the magnetization, i.e.,_it is isotropic because the symmetry_of_the Hamiltonian is_not_directly_linked to_the crystallographic axes_of_the underlying_crystal_lattice (when the cubic symmetry term_in_Eq.  is disregarded). For a finite system,_the shape of the_system_induces anisotropy in the_magnetization damping. This effect is_illustrated in Fig. \[fig:Fig2\], which plots the_effective damping_in Eq. _as a function of the magnetization directions for different system shapes._When the cross-section of the conductor_is deformed from a_regular shape_to_the shape of_a_thinner system,_the anisotropy of the damping changes. The_magnetization damping_varies from a minimum value of_around 0.004 to a_maximum_value of 0.006, e.g., the anisotropy_is around 50%. The relaxation process_is largest along the axis_where_the_ballistic leads are connected, i.e.,_the y-axis. This shape anisotropy is_about four- to_five-times stronger than the anisotropy