\]) below. This result is very much in the spirit of [@SS Theorem 1], in that it assumes a priori smallness of the (genuine) singular set (hypothesis (ii)).

In the following, $h$ denotes the generalized mean curvature of $V$, which is assumed to be in $L^p(\|V\|)$ for $p>n$; the excess $E_{\rho}$ that appears in (vi) is the one used in [@BW]. (See [@BW Section 1.4] for a discussion regarding the exponent (namely $1/p$ as opposed to $2/p$), that appears in the term involving the mean curvature).

\[thm:SSsheeting\] Given $q$ a positive integer, $p > n$ and numbers $\mu$, $\mu_{1}$, $\rho_{0}$, there exists $\eps = \eps(n, p, q, \mu, \mu_{1}\rho_{0}) \in (0, 1/2)$ such that the following holds: Let $\widetilde{F} \, : \, B_{\rho_{0}}^{n+1}(0) \times {\mathbb R}^{n+1} \setminus \{0\} \to {\mathbb R}$ be such that $\widetilde{F}( \cdot, p) \in C^{2, \alpha}(B_{\rho_{0}}^{n+1}(0))$ and $\widetilde{F}(x, \cdot) \in C^{3}({\mathbb R}^{n+1} \setminus \{0\})$. For constant vector $\vec{c}$, let $\widetilde{F}_{\vec{c}}(x, p) = \widetilde{F}(x, p) + \vec{c} \cdot p$. Suppose that for each $y \in B_{\rho_{0}/2}^{n+1}(0)$, there is a vector $\vec{c}(y) \in {\mathbb R}^{n+1}$ and a $C^{2}$ diffeomorphism $\eta_{y} \, : \, B^{n+1}_{\rho_{0}}(0) \to B^{n+1}_{\rho_{0}}(0)$ with $\eta_{y}(0) = y$ and $\eta_{0} = identity$ such that $\eta_{y}^{\#} \widetilde{F}_{\vec{c}(y)}$ satisfies [@SS (1.2)-(1.5)] taken with $\eta_{y}^{\
\ ]) below. This result is very much in the spirit of [ @SS Theorem 1 ], in that it assume a priori pettiness of the (genuine) singular specify (guess (ii) ). 

 In the following, $ h$ denotes the generalized beggarly curvature of $ V$, which is assumed to be in $ L^p(\|V\|)$ for $ p > n$; the excess $ E_{\rho}$ that look in (vi) is the one used in [ @BW ]. (See [ @BW incision 1.4 ] for a discussion regarding the exponent (namely $ 1 / p$ as pit to $ 2 / p$), that appears in the condition involving the mean curvature). 

 \[thm: SSsheeting\ ] contribute $ q$ a positive integer, $ p > n$ and numbers $ \mu$, $ \mu_{1}$, $ \rho_{0}$, there exist $ \eps = \eps(n, p, q, \mu, \mu_{1}\rho_{0 }) \in (0, 1/2)$ such that the following holds: Let $ \widetilde{F } \, : \, B_{\rho_{0}}^{n+1}(0) \times { \mathbb R}^{n+1 } \setminus \{0\ } \to { \mathbb R}$ be such that $ \widetilde{F } (\cdot, p) \in C^{2, \alpha}(B_{\rho_{0}}^{n+1}(0))$ and $ \widetilde{F}(x, \cdot) \in C^{3}({\mathbb R}^{n+1 } \setminus \{0\})$. For constant vector $ \vec{c}$, permit $ \widetilde{F}_{\vec{c}}(x, p) = \widetilde{F}(x, p) + \vec{c } \cdot p$. Suppose that for each $ y \in B_{\rho_{0}/2}^{n+1}(0)$, there is a vector $ \vec{c}(y) \in { \mathbb R}^{n+1}$ and a $ C^{2}$ diffeomorphism $ \eta_{y } \, : \, B^{n+1}_{\rho_{0}}(0) \to B^{n+1}_{\rho_{0}}(0)$ with $ \eta_{y}(0) = y$ and $ \eta_{0 } = identity$ such that $ \eta_{y}^{\ # } \widetilde{F}_{\vec{c}(y)}$ satisfies [ @SS (1.2)-(1.5) ] taken with $ \eta_{y}^{\
\]) bepow. This result is very ouch in the spitir of [@SV Theodem 1], in ghat it assumes a priori smaplbess if the (genuine) singulaf set (hyplthesis (ui)).

In rhe followmhg, $h$ dekjtes bhe gznxralized mean corvature of $E$, which is assgmdd to be in $L^p(\|V\|)$ for $p>n$; the excess $E_{\rhj}$ that spoears in (vi) is the jne hsed in [@BW]. (See [@BW Section 1.4] for a djscussimn regarding yhe exponent (namely $1/p$ as ooposfd to $2/p$), that appeags in the tgdm ybvolving the mean curvature).

\[thm:SSshgeting\] Given $q$ a positive integef, $p > u$ and numbets $\mk$, $\mu_{1}$, $\rho_{0}$, thece exifts $\eps = \eps(k, p, q, \mg, \mu_{1}\rho_{0}) \in (0, 1/2)$ such thab the foolowing holds: Let $\widxtilde{F} \, : \, B_{\rho_{0}}^{n+1}(0) \timgs {\mathbb S}^{n+1} \setminus \{0\} \to {\matybv R}$ bg sucv thxr $\wkdeuilve{F}( \cdot, o) \ii C^{2, \alpha}(B_{\rgo_{0}}^{n+1}(0))$ and $\widwtilde{F}(x, \cdot) \in C^{3}({\mstrvb R}^{n+1} \setminua \{0\})$. For cjnstant vector $\vec{c}$, let $\widetilde{F}_{\vec{c}}(x, p) = \widetilde{F}(x, p) + \vec{c} \cdit p$. Suppose that for each $y \ig B_{\rho_{0}/2}^{n+1}(0)$, there is a vector $\vec{c}(y) \in {\mathbb R}^{n+1}$ and d $C^{2}$ dmfweonovphirn $\fta_{y} \, : \, B^{n+1}_{\rho_{0}}(0) \to B^{n+1}_{\rho_{0}}(0)$ with $\eta_{y}(0) = y$ and $\eta_{0} = ysemtpty$ such that $\eta_{n}^{\#} \widetilde{F}_{\vec{c}(y)}$ xahixsies [@SS (1.2)-(1.5)] takev with $\etz_{y}^{\
\]) below. This result is very much spirit [@SS Theorem in that it the singular set (hypothesis In the following, denotes the generalized mean curvature of which is assumed to be in $L^p(\|V\|)$ for $p>n$; the excess $E_{\rho}$ that in (vi) is the one used in [@BW]. (See [@BW Section 1.4] for discussion the (namely as opposed to $2/p$), that appears in the term involving the mean curvature). \[thm:SSsheeting\] Given $q$ positive integer, $p > n$ and numbers $\mu$, $\rho_{0}$, there exists $\eps \eps(n, p, q, \mu, \mu_{1}\rho_{0}) (0, such that following Let \, : \, \times {\mathbb R}^{n+1} \setminus \{0\} \to {\mathbb R}$ be such that $\widetilde{F}( \cdot, p) \in C^{2, \alpha}(B_{\rho_{0}}^{n+1}(0))$ $\widetilde{F}(x, \cdot) R}^{n+1} \setminus For vector let $\widetilde{F}_{\vec{c}}(x, p) p) + \vec{c} \cdot p$. Suppose $y \in B_{\rho_{0}/2}^{n+1}(0)$, there is a vector $\vec{c}(y) {\mathbb R}^{n+1}$ a $C^{2}$ diffeomorphism $\eta_{y} \, : B^{n+1}_{\rho_{0}}(0) \to B^{n+1}_{\rho_{0}}(0)$ with $\eta_{y}(0) = y$ and = identity$ such that $\eta_{y}^{\#} \widetilde{F}_{\vec{c}(y)}$ satisfies [@SS (1.2)-(1.5)] taken with $\eta_{y}^{\
\]) below. This result is very much In the spiriT of [@SS theOreM 1], iN thaT it aSsumes a priori sMAllnEss of the (genuine) singulaR set (hYpOThesIS (iI)).

In thE followINg, $H$ DEnoTeS tHe gEnERaLized MeaN curvatUre of $V$, whicH is AsSumed to be in $L^P(\|v\|)$ fOr $p>n$; the excEss $e_{\rho}$ that appeArs In (vi) is ThE onE Used iN [@BW]. (see [@BW sectioN 1.4] For a diScussion rEgARding tHE exponeNT (NaMely $1/P$ as opposed to $2/p$), that APpEArs in the term inVolvinG tHE mEAN cuRvaTure).

\[thm:SSsHeEting\] gIven $q$ a pOSiTIVE inTEger, $p > n$ and numbErs $\mu$, $\mu_{1}$, $\rho_{0}$, tHEre Exists $\EpS = \epS(N, p, q, \mu, \mU_{1}\rho_{0}) \iN (0, 1/2)$ sUCh tHat the folloWing Holds: Let $\wIdetilDE{F} \, : \, B_{\rho_{0}}^{n+1}(0) \TImes {\matHbb R}^{n+1} \sEtmInuS \{0\} \to {\mAThBb r}$ be SuCH thAT $\wIdeTIldE{F}( \cdot, p) \iN C^{2, \AlPha}(B_{\rHo_{0}}^{n+1}(0))$ aND $\WIDetiLde{f}(x, \cdOt) \in C^{3}({\Mathbb R}^{n+1} \setmiNus \{0\})$. for cONstAnt veCtor $\vEc{c}$, lEt $\WidetIlde{F}_{\vEc{c}}(x, p) = \WiDetilde{F}(x, p) + \vec{c} \cDot p$. suppose thAt fOr EacH $y \In B_{\rhO_{0}/2}^{N+1}(0)$, there Is a VecTor $\vec{c}(Y) \in {\mathBB R}^{n+1}$ AnD A $c^{2}$ DiFfeomorphism $\eta_{y} \, : \, B^{n+1}_{\RhO_{0}}(0) \TO B^{N+1}_{\rho_{0}}(0)$ with $\Eta_{y}(0) = y$ aND $\eTa_{0} = IDentity$ sUcH thAt $\etA_{Y}^{\#} \WidetIlde{f}_{\VeC{c}(y)}$ satisFies [@SS (1.2)-(1.5)] TAkEn With $\eta_{Y}^{\
\]) below. This result isvery muchin th e s pir it  of[@SS  Theorem 1], i n  tha t it assumes a priorismall ne s s of th e (ge nuine)s in g u lar  s et  (h yp o th esis(ii )).

In  the follo win g,  $h$ denotes th e generali zed  mean curvat ure  of $V $,  wh i ch is  as sumed  to be in $L^ p(\|V\|)$  f o r $p>n $ ; the e x c es s $E _{\rho}$ that app e ar s  in (vi) is th e oneus e di n  [@ BW] . (See [@B WSecti o n 1.4]f or a dis c ussion regard ing the exp o nen t (nam el y $ 1 /p$ as  oppo se d  to  $2/p$), th at a ppears in  the t e rm invo l ving th e mean  cu rva ture ) .
\ [th m: S Ssh e et ing \ ] G iven $q$  a  p ositi ve i n t e g er,$p> n$  andnumbers $\mu$ , $ \mu_ { 1}$ , $\r ho_{0 }$,th ere e xists$\eps  =  \eps(n, p, q,\mu,  \mu_{1}\ rho _{ 0})  \ in (0 ,  1/2)$  su chthat th e follo w ing  h o l d s:  Let $\widetilde{F }\ ,  :  \, B_{\ rho_{0 } }^ {n + 1}(0) \t im es{\ma t h bb R} ^{n+ 1 }\setminu s \{0\ }  \ to  {\math bb  R}$ b esuc h t hat $ \ wide tilde{ F}( \cdo t, p) \in C^{2, \alp h a}(B_{\rho_{0 } }^ { n +1 } (0)) $ a nd $\wideti lde{ F }(x,  \cd o t)  \i n  C^{3 }({\m at h bb R}^{n+1} \setminus\{ 0\})$.  Forconstant vect or $\vec{c } $ ,  let $\w idet i ld e {F}_{\vec{c}}( x, p)  = \wideti l de{F}(x,  p) +  \vec{c}  \cdot p$ . Supposetha t f oreac h $y  \in B_{\rho_ { 0 }/2} ^{ n+1}(0) $,there i s a  ve cto r $ \v ec{c}(y)\in {\ma th bb  R }^ {n+ 1}$ a n d a $C^{ 2} $ d if feo morph i sm $\e ta_{y } \,  :  \ ,  B^ {n+1}_{ \ rh o _ {0}} (0 )\toB^{ n+ 1}_{\ rho_ { 0}} (0)$ wi th $\eta_ {y} ( 0) =  y $and $\e ta_{0} = iden ti ty$ such t ha t $ \eta_{ y } ^{\#} \w idetilde{F}_{\vec{c}(y) } $ satis fie s [@S S (1 .2)-(1.5) ] t aken w ith $\eta_ {y}^{\ 
\]) below._This result_is very much in_the spirit_of_[@SS Theorem_1],_in that it_assumes a priori_smallness of the (genuine)_singular set (hypothesis_(ii)).

In_the following, $h$ denotes the generalized mean curvature of $V$, which is assumed to_be_in $L^p(\|V\|)$_for_$p>n$;_the excess $E_{\rho}$ that appears_in (vi) is the one_used in_[@BW]. (See [@BW Section 1.4] for a discussion_regarding_the exponent (namely_$1/p$ as opposed to $2/p$), that appears in the_term involving the mean curvature).

\[thm:SSsheeting\] Given_$q$ a positive_integer,_$p_> n$ and numbers_$\mu$, $\mu_{1}$, $\rho_{0}$, there exists $\eps_= \eps(n, p, q, \mu, \mu_{1}\rho_{0})_\in (0, 1/2)$ such that the following_holds: Let $\widetilde{F} \, : \,_B_{\rho_{0}}^{n+1}(0) \times {\mathbb R}^{n+1} \setminus_\{0\} \to_{\mathbb R}$ be such that_$\widetilde{F}( \cdot, p)_\in C^{2,_\alpha}(B_{\rho_{0}}^{n+1}(0))$ and $\widetilde{F}(x,_\cdot) \in C^{3}({\mathbb R}^{n+1} \setminus \{0\})$._For constant vector_$\vec{c}$, let $\widetilde{F}_{\vec{c}}(x, p) = \widetilde{F}(x,_p)_+ \vec{c} \cdot_p$._Suppose_that for_each $y \in_B_{\rho_{0}/2}^{n+1}(0)$,_there is_a_vector $\vec{c}(y) \in {\mathbb R}^{n+1}$ and_a_$C^{2}$ diffeomorphism $\eta_{y} \, : \, B^{n+1}_{\rho_{0}}(0)_\to B^{n+1}_{\rho_{0}}(0)$ with $\eta_{y}(0)_=_y$ and $\eta_{0} =_identity$ such that $\eta_{y}^{\#} \widetilde{F}_{\vec{c}(y)}$_satisfies [@SS (1.2)-(1.5)] taken with $\eta_{y}^{\