}(s)),v({W_{s}^{\gamma_{t}}},X^{\gamma_{t},x}(s)))dW(s),\\
X(t)= & x,\quad s\in\lbrack t,T].
\end{array}$$ Set $$(Y(s),Z(s))=(u({W_{s}^{\gamma_{t}}},X^{\gamma_{t},x}(s)),v({W_{s}^{\gamma_{t}}},X^{\gamma_{t},x}(s))),\quad t\leq s\leq T.$$ We have$$\begin{array}
[c]{rl}dX^{\gamma_{t},x}(s)= & b(W_{s}^{\gamma_{t}},X^{\gamma_{t},x}(s),Y(s),Z(s))ds+\sigma(W_{s}^{\gamma_{t}},X^{\gamma_{t},x}(s),Y(s),Z(s))dW(s),\\
X(t)= & x,\quad s\in\lbrack t,T].
\end{array}$$ Note that $u$ solves equation (4.1). Applying Functional $It\hat{o}$ formula to $Y(s)=u({W_{s}^{\gamma_{t}}},X^{\gamma_{t},x}(s))$, we get$$\begin{array}
[c]{rl}dY(s)= & h(W_{s}^{\gamma_{t}},X^{\gamma_{t},x}(s),Y(s),Z(s))dr+Z(s)dW(s),\\
Y(T)= & g(W_{T}^{\gamma_{t}},X^{\gamma_{t},x}(T))\quad s\in\lbrack t,T].
\end{array}$$ Thus, by the uniqueness and existence theorem of the FBSDE (Theorem 2.2), we have the result.$\Box$

Now we prove the converse to the about result.

Under Assumptions $2.2$, $3.2$ and $3.3$, the function $u(\gamma
_{t},x)=Y^{\gamma_{t},x}(t)$ is the unique $\mathbb{C}^{1,2,2}(\Lambda
\times\mathbb{R}^{m})$-solution of the path-dependent PDE $(4.1)$.

**[Proof.]{}** We only study the one dimensional case. By Corollary $3
} (s)),v({W_{s}^{\gamma_{t}}},X^{\gamma_{t},x}(s)))dW(s),\\ 
 X(t)= & x,\quad s\in\lbrack t, T ]. 
 \end{array}$$ Set $ $ (Y(s),Z(s))=(u({W_{s}^{\gamma_{t}}},X^{\gamma_{t},x}(s)),v({W_{s}^{\gamma_{t}}},X^{\gamma_{t},x}(s))),\quad t\leq s\leq T.$$ We have$$\begin{array } 
 [ c]{rl}dX^{\gamma_{t},x}(s)= & b(W_{s}^{\gamma_{t}},X^{\gamma_{t},x}(s),Y(s),Z(s))ds+\sigma(W_{s}^{\gamma_{t}},X^{\gamma_{t},x}(s),Y(s),Z(s))dW(s),\\ 
 X(t)= & x,\quad s\in\lbrack t, T ]. 
 \end{array}$$ Note that $ u$ solves equation (4.1). Applying Functional $ It\hat{o}$ rule to $ Y(s)=u({W_{s}^{\gamma_{t}}},X^{\gamma_{t},x}(s))$, we get$$\begin{array } 
 [ c]{rl}dY(s)= & h(W_{s}^{\gamma_{t}},X^{\gamma_{t},x}(s),Y(s),Z(s))dr+Z(s)dW(s),\\ 
 Y(T)= & g(W_{T}^{\gamma_{t}},X^{\gamma_{t},x}(T))\quad s\in\lbrack t, T ]. 
 \end{array}$$ therefore, by the uniqueness and existence theorem of the FBSDE (Theorem 2.2), we get the result.$\Box$ 

 immediately we prove the converse to the about result. 

 Under assumption $ 2.2 $, $ 3.2 $ and $ 3.3 $, the routine $ u(\gamma 
 _ { t},x)=Y^{\gamma_{t},x}(t)$ is the unique $ \mathbb{C}^{1,2,2}(\Lambda 
 \times\mathbb{R}^{m})$-solution of the way - pendent PDE $ (4.1)$. 

 * * [ Proof. ] { } * * We only learn the one dimensional case. By Corollary $ 3
}(s)),v({W_{d}^{\gamma_{t}}},X^{\gamma_{t},x}(s)))dW(s),\\
X(t)= & x,\duad s\in\lbrack j,T].
\wnd{arrey}$$ Set $$(G(s),Z(s))=(u({W_{s}^{\gxmma_{t}}},X^{\gamma_{t},x}(s)),v({W_{s}^{\gamma_{t}}},X^{\gamme_{t},x}(s))),\wuad u\jeq s\leq T.$$ We have$$\cegin{arraj}
[c]{rl}dX^{\gamna_{t},x}(w)= & b(W_{s}^{\gamma_{v}},S^{\gamma_{t},w}(f),Y(s),Z(a))fs+\siyme(W_{s}^{\gamma_{t}},X^{\gamma_{j},x}(s),Y(s),Z(s))dW(s),\\
X(t)= & x,\quad s\in\lbrdcy c,T].
\end{array}$$ Note that $u$ solves equatijn (4.1). Appkylng Functional $It\hse{o}$ fkgmmla to $Y(s)=u({W_{s}^{\gamma_{t}}},X^{\gamma_{t},x}(s))$, we gst$$\begin{erray}
[c]{rl}dY(s)= & h(W_{x}^{\gamma_{t}},X^{\gamma_{t},x}(s),Y(s),Z(s))dr+Z(s)dW(d),\\
Y(T)= & g(W_{T}^{\gamma_{t}},X^{\gamma_{t},x}(H))\quad s\in\lbtzck r,T].
\end{array}$$ Tfus, by the uniqueness znd existence theorem of the FBRDE (Tkeorem 2.2), we yace hve result.$\Boe$

Now wv prove the converse do the sbout result.

Uncer Aswumptions $2.2$, $3.2$ and $3.3$, the hunction $u(\gamma
_{t},x)=Y^{\gaima_{t},x}(t)$ is tke unique $\mathbb{C}^{1,2,2}(\Lambea
\rimes\kathtb{R}^{m})$-rilugioh pf the pwth-vependent PSE $(4.1)$.

**[Proof.]{}** We only study the one dynensional cass. By Cjrjllary $3
}(s)),v({W_{s}^{\gamma_{t}}},X^{\gamma_{t},x}(s)))dW(s),\\ X(t)= & x,\quad s\in\lbrack t,T]. \end{array}$$ t\leq T.$$ We [c]{rl}dX^{\gamma_{t},x}(s)= & b(W_{s}^{\gamma_{t}},X^{\gamma_{t},x}(s),Y(s),Z(s))ds+\sigma(W_{s}^{\gamma_{t}},X^{\gamma_{t},x}(s),Y(s),Z(s))dW(s),\\ \end{array}$$ that $u$ solves (4.1). Applying Functional formula to $Y(s)=u({W_{s}^{\gamma_{t}}},X^{\gamma_{t},x}(s))$, we get$$\begin{array} [c]{rl}dY(s)= h(W_{s}^{\gamma_{t}},X^{\gamma_{t},x}(s),Y(s),Z(s))dr+Z(s)dW(s),\\ Y(T)= & g(W_{T}^{\gamma_{t}},X^{\gamma_{t},x}(T))\quad s\in\lbrack t,T]. \end{array}$$ Thus, by the uniqueness and existence of the FBSDE (Theorem 2.2), we have the result.$\Box$ Now we prove the to about Under $2.2$, $3.2$ and $3.3$, the function $u(\gamma _{t},x)=Y^{\gamma_{t},x}(t)$ is the unique $\mathbb{C}^{1,2,2}(\Lambda \times\mathbb{R}^{m})$-solution of the path-dependent $(4.1)$. **[Proof.]{}** We only study the one dimensional By Corollary $3
}(s)),v({W_{s}^{\gamma_{t}}},X^{\gamma_{t},x}(s)))dW(s),\\
X(t)= & x,\Quad s\in\lbrAck t,T].
\End{ArrAy}$$ set $$(Y(S),Z(s))=(u({w_{s}^{\gamma_{t}}},X^{\gamma_{T},X}(s)),v({W_{S}^{\gamma_{t}}},X^{\gamma_{t},x}(s))),\quad t\lEq s\leQ T.$$ wE havE$$\BeGin{arRay}
[c]{rl}dx^{\GaMMA_{t},x}(S)= & b(w_{s}^{\GamMa_{T}},x^{\gAmma_{t},X}(s),Y(S),Z(s))ds+\siGma(W_{s}^{\gamma_{T}},X^{\gAmMa_{t},x}(s),Y(s),Z(s))dW(s),\\
x(T)= & x,\Quad s\in\lbrAck T,T].
\end{array}$$ NoTe tHat $u$ soLvEs eQUatioN (4.1). ApPlyinG FunctIOnal $It\Hat{o}$ formuLa TO $Y(s)=u({W_{s}^{\GAmma_{t}}},X^{\gAMMa_{T},x}(s))$, wE get$$\begin{array}
[c]{rl}Dy(s)= & H(w_{s}^{\gamma_{t}},X^{\gamma_{T},x}(s),Y(s),Z(S))dR+z(s)Dw(S),\\
Y(T)= & G(W_{T}^{\Gamma_{t}},X^{\gamMa_{T},x}(T))\quAD s\in\lbrACk T,t].
\ENd{aRRay}$$ Thus, by the uNiqueness anD ExiStence ThEorEM of the fBSDE (thEOreM 2.2), we have the rEsulT.$\Box$

Now we Prove tHE converSE to the aBout reSulT.

UnDer ASSuMpTioNs $2.2$, $3.2$ ANd $3.3$, tHE fUncTIon $U(\gamma
_{t},x)=y^{\gAmMa_{t},x}(t)$ Is thE UNIQue $\mAthBb{C}^{1,2,2}(\LAmbda
\Times\mathbb{R}^{m})$-SolUtioN Of tHe patH-depeNdenT PdE $(4.1)$.

**[ProOf.]{}** We onLy stuDy The one dimensionAl caSe. By CorolLarY $3
}(s)),v({W_{s}^{\gamma_{t} }},X^{\gam ma_{t },x }(s )) )dW( s),\ \
X(t)= & x,\q u ad s \in\lbrack t,T].
\end{ array }$ $  Set $$ (Y(s) ,Z(s))= ( u( { W _{s }^ {\ gam ma _ {t }}},X ^{\ gamma_{ t},x}(s)), v({ W_ {s}^{\gamma_ { t} }},X^{\gam ma_ {t},x}(s))), \qu ad t\l eq  s\ l eq T. $$We ha ve$$\b e gin{ar ray}
[c]{ rl } dX^{\g a mma_{t} , x }( s)=& b(W_{s}^{\gamma _ {t } },X^{\gamma_{t },x}(s ), Y (s ) , Z(s ))d s+\sigma(W _{ s}^{\ g amma_{t } }, X ^ { \ga m ma_{t},x}(s), Y(s),Z(s))d W (s) ,\\
X( t) = & x,\qua d s\i n\ l bra ck t,T].
\e nd{a rray}$$ N ote th a t $u$ s o lves eq uation  (4 .1) . Ap p ly in g F un c tio n al  $I t \ha t{o}$ fo rm ul a to$Y(s ) = u ( {W_{ s}^ {\ga mma_{ t}}},X^{\gamm a_{ t},x } (s) )$, w e get $$\b eg in{ar ray}
[ c]{rl }d Y(s)= & h(W_{s} ^{\g amma_{t}} ,X^ {\ gam ma _{t}, x }(s),Y (s) ,Z( s))dr+Z (s)dW(s ) ,\\ 
Y ( T ) =& g(W_{T}^{\gamma_ {t } } ,X ^{\gamma _{t},x } (T )) \ quad s\i n\ lbr ackt , T].
\ end{ a rr ay}$$ Th us, by th euniquen es s andex ist enc e the o remof the  FBSDE ( Theor e m 2.2), we hav e  the result.$ \ Bo x $ 
N ow w e p rove the co nver s e to  the ab out resul t.

U nd e rA ssumptions $2.2$, $ 3. 2$ and  $3.3 $, the functi on $u(\gam m a _{t},x)= Y^{\ g am m a_{t},x}(t)$ i s the  unique $\ m athbb{C} ^{1,2 ,2}(\Lam bda
\time s \ mathbb{R }^{ m}) $-s olu t i on  of the path- d e pend en t PDE $ (4. 1)$.

* *[P roo f.] {}* *We only s tudy the  o ne  d im ens ional case. By  C oro ll ary  $3
}(s)),v({W_{s}^{\gamma_{t}}},X^{\gamma_{t},x}(s)))dW(s),\\
X(t)= &_x,\quad s\in\lbrack_t,T].
\end{array}$$ Set $$(Y(s),Z(s))=(u({W_{s}^{\gamma_{t}}},X^{\gamma_{t},x}(s)),v({W_{s}^{\gamma_{t}}},X^{\gamma_{t},x}(s))),\quad t\leq_s\leq T.$$_We_have$$\begin{array}
[c]{rl}dX^{\gamma_{t},x}(s)= &_b(W_{s}^{\gamma_{t}},X^{\gamma_{t},x}(s),Y(s),Z(s))ds+\sigma(W_{s}^{\gamma_{t}},X^{\gamma_{t},x}(s),Y(s),Z(s))dW(s),\\
X(t)=_& x,\quad s\in\lbrack_t,T].
\end{array}$$ Note that_$u$ solves equation (4.1)._Applying Functional $It\hat{o}$_formula_to $Y(s)=u({W_{s}^{\gamma_{t}}},X^{\gamma_{t},x}(s))$, we get$$\begin{array}
[c]{rl}dY(s)= & h(W_{s}^{\gamma_{t}},X^{\gamma_{t},x}(s),Y(s),Z(s))dr+Z(s)dW(s),\\
Y(T)= & g(W_{T}^{\gamma_{t}},X^{\gamma_{t},x}(T))\quad s\in\lbrack t,T].
\end{array}$$ Thus, by the uniqueness_and_existence theorem_of_the_FBSDE (Theorem 2.2), we have_the result.$\Box$

Now we prove the_converse to_the about result.

Under Assumptions $2.2$, $3.2$ and $3.3$,_the_function $u(\gamma
_{t},x)=Y^{\gamma_{t},x}(t)$ is_the unique $\mathbb{C}^{1,2,2}(\Lambda
\times\mathbb{R}^{m})$-solution of the path-dependent PDE $(4.1)$.

**[Proof.]{}** We_only study the one dimensional case._By Corollary $3