$ with a small amplitude, with the latter inherited from the transition to the rapidly oscillating phase of the scalar field. As for the SFDM velocity perturbations, see Eq. , because $e^\alpha \to {\rm const.}$ their amplitude quickly decreases as $\rho_\phi
\Theta_\phi \simeq (k^2/2am) \rho_\phi e^\alpha \sim a^{-4}$. Together with the results in the previous section, this reinforces our argument in Sec. \[sec:gauge-ambig-matt\] that the velocity gradient of SFDM evolves as expected of a pressureless component in the gauge corresponding to the comoving frame of a CDM component.

Numerical examples for small scales are also shown in Figs. \[fig:6\] and \[fig:7\] for the masses $m = 10^{-24},
10^{-26} \, {\rm eV}$, and they agree very well with the behavior inferred from the approximate solutions described just above: the density contrast is just an oscillating function with a tiny amplitude, whereas the velocity gradient oscillates with a rapidly decaying amplitude.

Power spectrum and mass function {#sec:mass-power-spectrum}
================================

In order to exploit the constraining power of future galaxy surveys such as DESI[@Levi:2013gra] and LSST[@Ivezic:2008fe], it will be necessary to perform an accurate modeling of the linear, and non linear, matter PS of any given dark matter model, for wavenumbers up to $k
\sim 10 h \, {\rm Mpc}^{-1}$. For $\Lambda$CDM models, linear perturbation theory provides good accuracy up to scales of $k \sim 0.1 h \, {\rm Mpc}^{-1}$, whereas dark matter-only N-body simulations provide good results up to $k \sim 0.5 h \, {\rm
  Mpc}^{-1}$, for larger values of $k$ it is necessary to include baryonic physics in the simulations [@Schneider:2015yka].

For the SFDM model, we are able to describe the linear PS at scales that can be considered in the semi-linear regime without any by-hand approximation. A correct treatment of the linear and semi-linear regime impacts the study of the structure formation process in two aspects: on setting up the initial conditions for cosmological simulations, and on the prediction (as a first approach) of observables about large and small scale structure
$ with a small amplitude, with the latter inherited from the transition to the rapidly hover phase of the scalar sphere. As for the SFDM velocity perturbations, see Eq.  , because $ e^\alpha \to { \rm const.}$ their amplitude cursorily decreases as $ \rho_\phi 
 \Theta_\phi \simeq (k^2/2am) \rho_\phi e^\alpha \sim a^{-4}$. Together with the resultant role in the former section, this reinforces our argument in Sec.   \[sec: gauge - ambig - matt\ ] that the velocity gradient of SFDM evolves as expect of a pressureless component in the gauge equate to the comoving skeletal system of a CDM component. 

 numeric examples for small plate are also shown in Figs.   \[fig:6\ ] and   \[fig:7\ ] for the masses $ m = 10^{-24 }, 
 10^{-26 } \, { \rm eV}$, and they harmonize very well with the behavior inferred from the approximate solutions described merely above: the density contrast is just an oscillating function with a tiny amplitude, whereas the speed gradient oscillates with a rapidly decaying amplitude. 

 Power spectrum and mass function { # sec: mass - power - spectrum } 
 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 

 In club to overwork the constraining power of future galaxy surveys such as DESI[@Levi:2013gra ] and LSST[@Ivezic:2008fe ], it will be necessary to perform an accurate modeling of the linear, and non linear, topic PS of any given blue matter model, for wavenumbers up to $ k 
 \sim 10 h \, { \rm Mpc}^{-1}$. For $ \Lambda$CDM model, linear perturbation theory provide good accuracy up to scales of $ k \sim 0.1 h \, { \rm Mpc}^{-1}$, whereas dark matter - merely N - body simulations provide good results up to $ k \sim 0.5 h \, { \rm 
   Mpc}^{-1}$, for larger value of $ k$ it is necessary to include baryonic physics in the simulations [ @Schneider:2015yka ]. 

 For the SFDM model, we are able to identify the linear PS at scale that can be regard in the semi - linear regime without any by - hand estimate. A correct treatment of the linear and semi - linear regime impacts the study of the structure formation summons in two aspects: on arrange up the initial conditions for cosmologic simulations, and on the prediction (as a inaugural approach) of observables about bombastic and small plate structure
$ wihh a small amplitude, witm the latter inhgruted fcom the transitkon to the rapidly oscillatiig pyase if the scalar field. As for the DFDM velicitb perturbations, see Eq. , bceause $c^\alphc \vo {\rm const.}$ thelr amplituda quickly decraared as $\rho_\phi
\Theta_\phi \simeq (k^2/2am) \rho_\phy e^\alphs \dim a^{-4}$. Together witn the gewults in the previous section, this rtinforces our argukent in Sec. \[sec:gauge-ambig-maht\] tjat the velocity ggadient of WFDM wvolves as ebpected of a pressurelgss component in the gauge correrpondnng to the xonovltg frame of a CDI component.

Nmkerican exampkes for small xcanes are also shown in Fijs. \[fig:6\] and \[fig:7\] for the masses $m = 10^{-24},
10^{-26} \, {\rm eV}$, and they qgeee vgry wall duth tht bxhabior ijfecred from tge approximqte solutions descrobqe just above: fhe degsyty contrast is just an oscillating funbtioh with a tiny amplitude, whereas the velocity gradient oscillates with a rapidly decaying amplitude.

Powes spertfum akd mxws function {#sec:mass-power-spectrum}
================================

In order to expjkiu tme constraining iower of future gakady furveys such xs DESN[@Mebi:2013gra] and LSST[@Ivezlc:2008fe], it will be necesfary to perform an accurate modwling of the oinear, and non linzar, matter PR of any biven dark matter model, for wavenumberd up to $k
\akm 10 h \, {\rm Mpc}^{-1}$. Fof $\Lsmtda$CDM models, linear pertuwbation tieory providds gpod acsuracy up ho scales of $k \sim 0.1 h \, {\rl Mpc}^{-1}$, wvereas darn matter-only N-body simulations 'covide good rgsunts up to $k \sim 0.5 h \, {\rm
  Mpc}^{-1}$, fjr larger valugs of $k$ ic is ndcessary tk incluve baryonic [hysics in tha simulations [@Schneidqr:2015ykq].

For the SFAO model, we are able to btscribe thw linear PS at scakes fhat can be conwidtrwd in the semi-kindar rvgike fithout any ty-havd xlproxkmation. A cifrecy treatment of the lhnead and semi-linear rrglme impacjs the sttdy of the sttucture formation krocesv ii two sspgcts: on setting up the initial donditiond fjr cosmologisal wimulations, cnd on the prediction (as a first approaci) of observables about oarge and small scakt structure
$ with a small amplitude, with the from transition to rapidly oscillating phase for SFDM velocity perturbations, Eq. , because \to {\rm const.}$ their amplitude quickly as $\rho_\phi \Theta_\phi \simeq (k^2/2am) \rho_\phi e^\alpha \sim a^{-4}$. Together with the results the previous section, this reinforces our argument in Sec. \[sec:gauge-ambig-matt\] that the velocity of evolves expected a pressureless component in the gauge corresponding to the comoving frame of a CDM component. Numerical for small scales are also shown in Figs. and \[fig:7\] for the $m = 10^{-24}, 10^{-26} \, eV}$, they agree well the inferred from the solutions described just above: the density contrast is just an oscillating function with a tiny amplitude, whereas velocity gradient a rapidly amplitude. spectrum mass function {#sec:mass-power-spectrum} order to exploit the constraining power surveys such as DESI[@Levi:2013gra] and LSST[@Ivezic:2008fe], it will necessary to an accurate modeling of the linear, non linear, matter PS of any given dark model, for wavenumbers up to $k \sim 10 h \, {\rm Mpc}^{-1}$. For $\Lambda$CDM models, theory provides good accuracy to scales of \sim h {\rm whereas dark N-body simulations provide good results up to $k \sim 0.5 h {\rm Mpc}^{-1}$, for larger values of $k$ it is necessary baryonic in the simulations For the SFDM model, are to describe the linear scales can the regime any by-hand approximation. A treatment of the linear and regime impacts the study in two aspects: on setting up the initial for cosmological simulations, and on the prediction a first approach) of observables about large and small scale structure
$ with a small amplitude, with thE latter inhEriteD frOm tHe TranSitiOn to the rapidly OScilLating phase of the scalar Field. as FOr thE sFdM velOcity peRTuRBAtiOnS, sEe EQ. , bECaUse $e^\aLphA \to {\rm coNst.}$ their amPliTuDe quickly decREaSes as $\rho_\phI
\ThEta_\phi \simeq (k^2/2Am) \rHo_\phi e^\AlPha \SIm a^{-4}$. ToGetHer wiTh the rESults iN the previOuS SectioN, This reiNFOrCes oUr argument in Sec. \[seC:GaUGe-ambig-matt\] thaT the veLoCItY GRadIenT of SFDM evoLvEs as eXPected oF A pRESSurELess component In the gauge cORreSpondiNg To tHE comovIng frAmE Of a cDM componenT.

NumErical exaMples fOR small sCAles are Also shOwn In FIgs. \[fIG:6\] aNd \[Fig:7\] FoR The MAsSes $M = 10^{-24},
10^{-26} \, {\Rm ev}$, and they AgReE very Well WITH The bEhaVior InferRed from the appRoxImatE SolUtionS descRibeD jUst abOve: the DensiTy Contrast is just aN oscIllating fUncTiOn wItH a tinY AmplitUde, WheReas the VelocitY GraDiENT OsCillates with a rapidLy DECaYing amplItude.

POWeR sPEctrum anD mAss FuncTIOn {#sec:Mass-POwEr-spectrUm}
================================

In orDEr To Exploit ThE constRaIniNg pOwer oF FutuRe galaXy surveyS such AS DESI[@Levi:2013gra] anD lSST[@Ivezic:2008fe], iT WiLL Be NEcesSarY to perform aN accURate ModeLInG of THe linEar, anD nON lINear, matter PS of any giVeN dark mAtter Model, for wavenUmbers up to $K
\SIM 10 h \, {\rm Mpc}^{-1}$. FOr $\LaMBdA$cDM models, lineaR pertUrbation thEOry proviDes goOd accuraCy up to scaLES of $k \sim 0.1 h \, {\Rm MPc}^{-1}$, wHerEas DARk Matter-only N-boDY SimuLaTions prOviDe good rEsuLts Up tO $k \sIm 0.5 H \, {\rm
  Mpc}^{-1}$, for Larger vaLuEs Of $K$ iT is NecesSAry to incLuDe bArYonIc phySIcs in tHe simUlatIoNs [@sChnEider:2015ykA].

foR THe SFdM MoDel, wE arE aBle to DescRIbe The lineAr PS at scaLes THat cAn Be ConsideRed in the semi-lInEar regime wItHouT any by-HANd approxImation. A correct treatmenT Of the liNeaR and sEmi-lInear regiMe iMpacts The STudy of The strUcturE fOrmATIon prOCEsS in TwO aspects: on SETtiNg up tHe InitIal condItions for cosmologiCAl sImulations, and On tHe prEDIcTioN (As A FirSt APprOACh) of observables About large AnD SmAll scale stRUctUrE
$ with a small amplitude,with the l atter  in her it ed f romthe transition to t he rapidly oscillating  phas eo f th e  s calar  field. As f orth eSFD Mv el ocity  pe rturbat ions, seeEq.  ,  because $e^ \ al pha \to {\ rmconst.}$ the iramplit ud e q u ickly  de creas es as$ \rho_\ phi
\Thet a_ \ phi \s i meq (k^ 2 / 2a m) \ rho_\phi e^\alpha \s i m a^{-4}$. Tog etherwi t ht h e r esu lts in the  p revio u s secti o n, t h isr einforces our  argument i n  Se c. \[s ec :ga u ge-amb ig-ma tt \ ] t hat the vel ocit y gradien t of S F DM evol v es as e xpecte d o f a  pre s su re les sc omp o ne nti n t he gauge  c or respo ndin g t o  the  co movi ng fr ame of a CDMcom pone n t.
Nume rical  exa mp les f or sma ll sc al es are also sho wn i n Figs. \ [fi g: 6\]  a nd \[ f ig:7\]  fo r t he mass es $m = 10^ {- 2 4 } ,10^{-26} \, {\rm e V} $ ,  a nd theyagreev er yw ell with  t hebeha v i or in ferr e dfrom the  appro x im at e solut io ns des cr ibe d j ust a b ove:  the d ensity c ontra s t is just an o s cillating fun c ti o n  w i th a  ti ny amplitud e, w h erea s th e  v elo c ity g radie nt os c illates with a rapi dl y deca yingamplitude.

P ower spect r u m  and mas s fu n ct i on {#sec:mass- power -spectrum} ======== ===== ======== ========= = = 

In ord ertoexp loi t th e constrainin g powe rof futu regalaxysur vey s s uch  a s DESI[@L evi:2013 gr a]  a nd  LS ST[@I v ezic:200 8f e],  i t w ill b e  neces saryto p er fo r m a n accur a te m odel in gof t heli near,  and non  linear , matterPSo f an ygi ven dar k matter mode l,  for waven um ber s up t o $k
\sim10 h \, {\rm Mpc}^{-1}$ .  For $\ Lam bda$C DM m odels, li nea r pert urb a tion t heoryprovi de s g o o d acc u r ac y u pto scaleso f  $k  \sim  0 .1 h  \, {\r m Mpc}^{-1}$, wher e asdark matter-o nly  N-b o d ysim u la t ion sp rov i d e good resultsup to $k \ si m  0 .5 h \, {\ r m
 M pc}^{-1 }$, for  larg e r value s of $k$it is nec es sary t o i nclude bar yonic ph ysics int he si m ul ation s [ @Schne id er: 2015y ka].
F orthe S FDM mo de l, weare a bl e to des cribe the linear PS atscales  that  ca n be cons ide r edin the se mi-l inear regi mewit houtany by-ha nd a p pr oxi m ation . Ac orrect tr e at men t of  the linear a n d s emi-l ine a r regi me i mpacts the studyo f the structur e fo r m ati onp roce ss  in two aspect s:on s etting u pthe initial  conditi on s  forcosmol ogical  simula t i on s , andon t hepredictio n ( as a first  a pp r oach)of o bs ervabl es abo u t la r g e and small scal e str u c ture
$ with_a small_amplitude, with the latter_inherited from_the_transition to_the_rapidly oscillating phase_of the scalar_field. As for the_SFDM velocity perturbations,_see_Eq. , because $e^\alpha \to {\rm const.}$ their amplitude quickly decreases as $\rho_\phi
\Theta_\phi \simeq (k^2/2am)_\rho_\phi_e^\alpha \sim_a^{-4}$._Together_with the results in the_previous section, this reinforces our_argument in_Sec. \[sec:gauge-ambig-matt\] that the velocity gradient of SFDM evolves_as_expected of a_pressureless component in the gauge corresponding to the comoving_frame of a CDM component.

Numerical examples_for small scales_are_also_shown in Figs. \[fig:6\] and \[fig:7\]_for the masses $m = 10^{-24},
10^{-26}_\, {\rm eV}$, and they agree_very well with the behavior inferred from_the approximate solutions described just above:_the density contrast is just_an oscillating_function with a tiny amplitude,_whereas the velocity_gradient oscillates_with a rapidly_decaying amplitude.

Power spectrum and mass function_{#sec:mass-power-spectrum}
================================

In order to_exploit the constraining power of future_galaxy_surveys such as_DESI[@Levi:2013gra]_and_LSST[@Ivezic:2008fe], it_will be necessary_to_perform an_accurate_modeling of the linear, and non_linear,_matter PS of any given dark matter_model, for wavenumbers up_to_$k
\sim 10 h \,_{\rm Mpc}^{-1}$. For $\Lambda$CDM models,_linear perturbation theory provides good accuracy_up to_scales of_$k \sim 0.1 h \, {\rm Mpc}^{-1}$, whereas dark matter-only N-body_simulations provide good results up to_$k \sim 0.5 h_\, {\rm
__Mpc}^{-1}$, for larger_values_of $k$_it is necessary to include baryonic physics_in the_simulations [@Schneider:2015yka].

For the SFDM model, we_are able to describe_the_linear PS at scales that can_be considered in the semi-linear regime_without any by-hand approximation. A_correct_treatment_of the linear and semi-linear_regime impacts the study of the_structure formation process_in two aspects: on setting up the_initial_conditions for cosmological simulations, and on_the_prediction (as a first approach) of_observables_about_large and small scale structure