 probability one, on the state space $\A_{\circ}$ defined as the collection of elements $(a^{\mathfrak b}, a^{\mathfrak a},\ell^{\mathfrak b},\ell^{\mathfrak a},\ell^{\mathfrak b, \frac{1}{2}},$ $\ell^{\mathfrak a,\frac{1}{2}},m^{\bk},$ $m^{\ak})$ $\in \N^{8}$ such that $$\begin{aligned}
\label{eq: def constraint A}
&\left\{\begin{array}{l}
a^{\mathfrak b} a^{\mathfrak a}=0\\
\ell^{\mathfrak b}= \ell^{\mathfrak a}=0\;\mbox{ if } \max\{a^{\mathfrak b},a^{\mathfrak a}\}\ge 1\\
\ell^{\mathfrak b, \frac{1}{2}}=0   \;\mbox{ if } \max\{    a^{\mathfrak b},a^{\mathfrak a},\ell^{\mathfrak b}\}\ge 1 \\
 \ell^{\mathfrak a, \frac{1}{2}}=0 \;\mbox{if } \max\{  a^{\mathfrak b},a^{\mathfrak a},\ell^{\mathfrak a}\}\ge 1 \\
 m^{\mathfrak b }=0   \;\mbox{ if } \max\{  a^{\mathfrak b},a^{\mathfrak a},\ell^{\mathfrak b},\ell^{\mathfrak b,\frac12}\}\ge 1 \\
 m^{\mathfrak a }=0 \;\mbox{if } \max\{ a^{\mathfrak b},a^{\mathfrak a},\ell^{\mathfrak a},\ell^{\mathfrak a,\frac12}\}\ge 1 
\end{array}\right..\end{aligned}$$ We interpret the above expression as follows. First, aggressive orders can not be sent simultaneously at the bid and at the ask. Next, limit orders (at the current bid/ask prices) can not be placed at the same time that aggressive orders are sent. Finally, one can not place limit orders within the spread if limit orders at the current bid/ask prices are placed. Because we only consider the first limits, these conditions are natural whenever one presumes that orders of different market participants do not arrive exactly at the same time.

Depending on the arrival of orders, queues can be depleted. In this case, new queues can be re-generated, at the same prices or at different prices, and possibly with a change of the spread value. To model this, we introduces a
probability one, on the state space $ \A_{\circ}$ defined as the collection of chemical element $ (a^{\mathfrak b }, a^{\mathfrak a},\ell^{\mathfrak b},\ell^{\mathfrak a},\ell^{\mathfrak b, \frac{1}{2}},$ $ \ell^{\mathfrak a,\frac{1}{2}},m^{\bk},$ $ m^{\ak})$ $ \in \N^{8}$ such that $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 \label{eq: def restraint A } 
 & \left\{\begin{array}{l } 
 a^{\mathfrak b } a^{\mathfrak a}=0\\ 
 \ell^{\mathfrak b}= \ell^{\mathfrak a}=0\;\mbox { if } \max\{a^{\mathfrak b},a^{\mathfrak a}\}\ge 1\\ 
 \ell^{\mathfrak b, \frac{1}{2}}=0    \;\mbox { if } \max\ {     a^{\mathfrak b},a^{\mathfrak a},\ell^{\mathfrak b}\}\ge 1 \\ 
  \ell^{\mathfrak a, \frac{1}{2}}=0 \;\mbox{if } \max\ {   a^{\mathfrak b},a^{\mathfrak a},\ell^{\mathfrak a}\}\ge 1 \\ 
  m^{\mathfrak b } = 0    \;\mbox { if } \max\ {   a^{\mathfrak b},a^{\mathfrak a},\ell^{\mathfrak b},\ell^{\mathfrak b,\frac12}\}\ge 1 \\ 
  m^{\mathfrak a } = 0 \;\mbox{if } \max\ { a^{\mathfrak b},a^{\mathfrak a},\ell^{\mathfrak a},\ell^{\mathfrak a,\frac12}\}\ge 1 
 \end{array}\right.. \end{aligned}$$ We interpret the above expression as follow. foremost, aggressive orders cannot be sent simultaneously at the bid and at the ask. Next, terminus ad quem order (at the current bid / necessitate price) cannot be placed at the like time that aggressive orders are sent. Finally, one cannot invest limit orders within the spread if limit orders at the current command / ask prices are placed. Because we only study the first limits, these condition are lifelike whenever one presumes that orders of different market participants do not arrive exactly at the same meter. 

 Depending on the arrival of orders, queues can be depleted. In this case, new queues can be re - generated, at the same prices or at different prices, and possibly with a change of the spread value. To model this, we introduces a
 prlbability one, on the staue space $\A_{\circ}$ deyuned av the dollectiun of elements $(a^{\mathfrak b}, a^{\larhfraj a},\ell^{\mathfrak b},\ell^{\matffrak a},\elp^{\mathfraj b, \hrac{1}{2}},$ $\ell^{\mathfrak a,\frac{1}{2}},m^{\bk},$ $m^{\ak})$ $\jk \N^{8}$ sbci that $$\begin{alinned}
\label{eq: def constraind X}
&\lzft\{\begin{array}{l}
a^{\mathfrak b} a^{\mathfrak w}=0\\
\ell^{\matnfgak b}= \ell^{\mathftak a}=0\;\kfox{ jf } \max\{a^{\mathfrak b},a^{\mathfrak a}\}\ge 1\\
\elm^{\mathfrek b, \frac{1}{2}}=0   \;\mboc{ if } \max\{    a^{\mathfrak b},a^{\mwthfgak a},\ell^{\mathfrak b}\}\he 1 \\
 \ell^{\matyfrah a, \frac{1}{2}}=0 \;\mbox{kf } \max\{  a^{\mathfrak b},a^{\mzthfrak a},\ell^{\mathfrak a}\}\ge 1 \\
 m^{\matffrak b }=0   \;\mbox{ id } \ldx\{  a^{\mathfrek b},a^{\mwthfrak a},\ell^{\mathfrak b},\ell^{\mayhfrak b,\frac12}\}\ge 1 \\
 k^{\marhfrak a }=0 \;\mbox{if } \max\{ a^{\mathfrak b},a^{\mathftak a},\ell^{\madhyrak a},\ell^{\mathfrak a,\frqc12}\}\te 1 
\etd{arsay}\rktht..\dnd{zlmgnsd}$$ We lntxrpret the zbove exprewsion as follows. Fitse, aggressive odders sag not be sent simultaneously at the bid ans at the ask. Next, limit orders (at the currenj bid/ask pwices) can not be placed at the same time that aggsessite orbcvs afw dent. Finally, one can not place limit orders wyfhon the spread if limit ordets ay the current cid/ask prjces are placed. Befause wg only consider the first limits, these conditiins are natugal qhenever one presules that orbers og difgerent market participauts do not arrive exactly zg the same time.

Ddpekditg on tht arrival of orderf, queues ran bz depletdd. Im this case, new eueues can be re-generatef, at jhe sake prices lr at different prices, and possmuly with a chsnce mf the s'read yalue. To model ehis, we introdoces a
probability one, on the state space $\A_{\circ}$ the of elements b}, a^{\mathfrak a},\ell^{\mathfrak a,\frac{1}{2}},m^{\bk},$ $\in \N^{8}$ such $$\begin{aligned} \label{eq: def A} &\left\{\begin{array}{l} a^{\mathfrak b} a^{\mathfrak a}=0\\ b}= \ell^{\mathfrak a}=0\;\mbox{ if } \max\{a^{\mathfrak b},a^{\mathfrak a}\}\ge 1\\ \ell^{\mathfrak b, \frac{1}{2}}=0 \;\mbox{ } \max\{ a^{\mathfrak b},a^{\mathfrak a},\ell^{\mathfrak b}\}\ge 1 \\ \ell^{\mathfrak a, \frac{1}{2}}=0 \;\mbox{if } a^{\mathfrak a},\ell^{\mathfrak 1 m^{\mathfrak b }=0 \;\mbox{ if } \max\{ a^{\mathfrak b},a^{\mathfrak a},\ell^{\mathfrak b},\ell^{\mathfrak b,\frac12}\}\ge 1 \\ m^{\mathfrak a \;\mbox{if } \max\{ a^{\mathfrak b},a^{\mathfrak a},\ell^{\mathfrak a},\ell^{\mathfrak a,\frac12}\}\ge \end{array}\right..\end{aligned}$$ We interpret the expression as follows. First, aggressive can be sent at bid at the ask. limit orders (at the current bid/ask prices) can not be placed at the same time that aggressive are sent. can not limit within spread if limit the current bid/ask prices are placed. consider the first limits, these conditions are natural one presumes orders of different market participants do arrive exactly at the same time. Depending on arrival of orders, queues can be depleted. In this case, new queues can be re-generated, same prices or at prices, and possibly a of spread To model we introduces a
 probability one, on the state sPace $\A_{\circ}$ dEfineD as The CoLlecTion Of elements $(a^{\matHFrak B}, a^{\mathfrak a},\ell^{\mathfrak B},\ell^{\mAtHFrak A},\ElL^{\mathFrak b, \frAC{1}{2}},$ $\eLL^{\MatHfRaK a,\fRaC{1}{2}},M^{\bK},$ $m^{\ak})$ $\iN \N^{8}$ sUch that $$\Begin{alignEd}
\lAbEl{eq: def constRAiNt A}
&\left\{\begIn{aRray}{l}
a^{\mathfrAk b} A^{\mathfRaK a}=0\\
\eLL^{\mathFraK b}= \ell^{\MathfrAK a}=0\;\mbox{ If } \max\{a^{\matHfRAk b},a^{\maTHfrak a}\}\gE 1\\
\ELl^{\MathFrak b, \frac{1}{2}}=0   \;\mbox{ if } \maX\{    A^{\mAThfrak b},a^{\mathfrAk a},\ell^{\MaTHfRAK b}\}\gE 1 \\
 \elL^{\mathfrak a, \FrAc{1}{2}}=0 \;\mboX{If } \max\{  a^{\mAThFRAK b},a^{\MAthfrak a},\ell^{\maThfrak a}\}\ge 1 \\
 m^{\mAThfRak b }=0   \;\mbOx{ If } \mAX\{  a^{\mathFrak b},A^{\mAThfRak a},\ell^{\mathFrak B},\ell^{\mathfRak b,\frAC12}\}\ge 1 \\
 m^{\matHFrak a }=0 \;\mbOx{if } \maX\{ a^{\mAthFrak B},A^{\mAtHfrAk A},\Ell^{\MAtHfrAK a},\eLl^{\mathfrAk A,\fRac12}\}\ge 1 
\End{aRRAY}\RighT..\enD{aliGned}$$ WE interpret the AboVe exPResSion aS follOws. FIrSt, aggRessivE ordeRs Can not be sent simUltaNeously at The BiD anD aT the aSK. Next, lImiT orDers (at tHe curreNT biD/aSK PRiCes) can not be placed aT tHE SaMe time thAt aggrESsIvE Orders arE sEnt. finaLLY, one cAn noT PlAce limit Orders WItHiN the sprEaD if limIt OrdErs At the CUrreNt bid/aSk prices Are plACed. Because we onLY consider the fIRsT LImITs, thEse Conditions aRe naTUral WhenEVeR onE PresuMes thAt ORdERs of different market PaRticipAnts dO not arrive exaCtly at the sAME Time.

DepeNdinG On THe arrival of ordErs, quEues can be dEPleted. In This cAse, new quEues can be RE-GenerateD, at The SamE prICEs Or at different PRIces, AnD possibLy wIth a chaNge Of tHe sPreAd Value. To moDel this, wE iNtRoDuCes A
 probability one, on the s tate space  $\A_ {\c irc }$  def ined  as the collec t ionof elements $(a^{\math frakb} ,  a^{ \ ma thfra k a},\e l l^ { \ mat hf ra k b }, \ el l^{\m ath frak a} ,\ell^{\ma thf ra k b, \frac{1 } {2 }},$ $\ell ^{\ mathfrak a,\ fra c{1}{2 }} ,m^ { \bk}, $ $ m^{\a k})$ $ \ in \N^ {8}$ such  t h at $$\ b egin{al i g ne d}
\ label{eq: def con s tr a int A}
&\left\ {\begi n{ a rr a y }{l }
a ^{\mathfra kb} a^ { \mathfr a ka } = 0\\ \ell^{\mathfr ak b}= \ell ^ {\m athfra ka}= 0 \;\mbo x{ if  } \ma x\{a^{\math frak  b},a^{\m athfra k  a}\}\g e  1\\
\e ll^{\m ath fra k b, \f ra c{1 }{ 2 }}= 0   \; \ mbo x{ if }\m ax \{   a^{ \ m a t hfra k b },a^ {\mat hfrak a},\ell ^{\ math f rak  b}\} \ge 1  \\ \ ell^{ \mathf rak a ,\frac{1}{2}}=0\;\m box{if }\ma x\ { a^ {\mat h frak b },a ^{\ mathfra k a},\e l l^{ \m a t h fr ak a}\}\ge 1 \\
 m ^{ \ m at hfrak b}=0  \ ;\ mb o x{ if }\m ax\ {  a ^ { \math frak b} ,a^{\mat hfraka }, \e ll^{\ma th frak b }, \el l^{ \math f rakb,\fra c12}\}\g e 1 \ \ 
 m^{\mathfrak a }=0 \;\mbox { if }  \ m ax\{  a^ {\mathfrakb},a ^ {\ma thfr a ka}, \ ell^{ \math fr a ka },\ell^{\mathfrak a ,\ frac12 }\}\g e 1 
\end{arr ay}\right. . \ e nd{align ed}$ $  W e  interpret the  abov e expressi o n as fol lows.  First,aggressiv e orders c annot  be  se n t  s imultaneously a t th ebid and  at  the as k.Nex t,lim it  orders ( at the c ur re nt  b id/ ask p r ices) ca nnot  b e p laced at the  same  tim eth a t a ggressi v eo r ders  a re  sen t.Fi nally , on e  ca n not p lace limi t o r ders  w it hin the  spread if li mi t orders a tthe  curre n t  bid/ask  prices are placed. Bec a use weonl y con side r the fir stlimits , t h ese co nditio ns ar enat u r al wh e n ev eron e presumes t hat  orde rs  ofdiffere nt market particip a nts  do not arriv e e xact l y  a t t h es ame  t i me. Depending on th e arrivalof or ders, queu e s c an  be dep leted.In th i s case,  new queu es can be  r e-ge n e rat ed, at the  same pr ices or a t  diff e re nt pr ice s, and  p oss iblywith a cha nge o f thesp read v alue.  T o modelthis, we introduces a
 probability_one, on_the state space $\A_{\circ}$_defined as_the_collection of_elements_$(a^{\mathfrak b}, a^{\mathfrak_a},\ell^{\mathfrak b},\ell^{\mathfrak a},\ell^{\mathfrak_b, \frac{1}{2}},$ $\ell^{\mathfrak a,\frac{1}{2}},m^{\bk},$_$m^{\ak})$ $\in \N^{8}$_such_that $$\begin{aligned}
\label{eq: def constraint A}
&\left\{\begin{array}{l}
a^{\mathfrak b} a^{\mathfrak a}=0\\
\ell^{\mathfrak b}= \ell^{\mathfrak a}=0\;\mbox{ if } \max\{a^{\mathfrak_b},a^{\mathfrak_a}\}\ge 1\\
\ell^{\mathfrak_b,_\frac{1}{2}}=0_  \;\mbox{ if }_\max\{    a^{\mathfrak_b},a^{\mathfrak a},\ell^{\mathfrak_b}\}\ge 1 \\
 \ell^{\mathfrak a, \frac{1}{2}}=0 \;\mbox{if }_\max\{_ a^{\mathfrak b},a^{\mathfrak_a},\ell^{\mathfrak a}\}\ge 1 \\
 m^{\mathfrak b }=0  _\;\mbox{ if } \max\{  a^{\mathfrak_b},a^{\mathfrak a},\ell^{\mathfrak b},\ell^{\mathfrak_b,\frac12}\}\ge_1_\\
 m^{\mathfrak a }=0_\;\mbox{if } \max\{ a^{\mathfrak b},a^{\mathfrak a},\ell^{\mathfrak_a},\ell^{\mathfrak a,\frac12}\}\ge 1 
\end{array}\right..\end{aligned}$$ We interpret_the above expression as follows. First, aggressive_orders can not be sent simultaneously_at the bid and at_the ask._Next, limit orders (at the_current bid/ask prices)_can not_be placed at_the same time that aggressive orders_are sent. Finally,_one can not place limit orders_within_the spread if_limit_orders_at the_current bid/ask prices_are_placed. Because_we_only consider the first limits, these_conditions_are natural whenever one presumes that orders_of different market participants_do_not arrive exactly at_the same time.

Depending on the_arrival of orders, queues can be_depleted. In_this case,_new queues can be re-generated, at the same prices or at_different prices, and possibly with a_change of the spread_value. To_model_this, we introduces_a