’s outcome is then $\langle a \rangle=\cos\alpha\cos\theta_x$.

Concerning Charlie, his outcome $c$ is totally determined by $\vec \lambda$ and $\vec z$. For simplicity we assume that $0\leq\theta_z\leq\pi/2$, but the other situation can be treated similarly. In this case, for $\alpha\leq\frac\pi2-\theta_z$, Charles always has $c=+1$, and for $\alpha\geq\frac\pi2+\theta_z$, he always has $c=-1$. Now for $\alpha\in[\frac\pi2-\theta_z,\frac\pi2+\theta_z]$, we can write $\mathcal{I}_+=[-\Phi_c+\varphi_z,\Phi_c+\varphi_z]$ the interval of $\beta$ for which the product $\vec\lambda\cdot\vec z \geq 0$, and $\mathcal{I}_-=[\varphi_z-\pi,\varphi_z+\pi]\backslash \mathcal{I}_+$ its complement, with $\Phi_c=\arccos(-\cot\alpha\cot\theta_z)$. We thus have the three following cases:

1.  $\alpha\leq\frac{\pi}2-\theta_z$. In this case $c=+1$, which gives $\langle ac\rangle=\cos\alpha\cos\theta_x$.

2.  $\alpha\geq\frac{\pi}2+\theta_z$. In this case $c=-1$, which gives $\langle ac\rangle=-\cos\alpha\cos\theta_x$.

3.  $\frac{\pi}2-\theta_z\leq\alpha\leq\frac{\pi}2+\theta_z$. In this case one has $\langle ac\rangle=\cos\alpha\cos\theta_x(\chi_\mathcal{I_+}(\beta)-\chi_\mathcal{I_-}(\beta))$ where $$\chi_\mathcal{I}(\beta)=\begin{cases}1&\text{if }\beta\in\mathcal{I}\\0&\text{if }\beta\notin\mathcal{I}\end{cases}$$ is the indicator function.

In total, after integration over $\alpha$ and $\beta$, this gives $\overline{\langle ac\rangle}=\frac12\cos\theta_x\cos\
’s outcome is then $ \langle a \rangle=\cos\alpha\cos\theta_x$. 

 Concerning Charlie, his outcome $ c$ is totally determine by $ \vec \lambda$ and $ \vec z$. For ease we assume that $ 0\leq\theta_z\leq\pi/2 $, but the other situation can be process similarly. In this case, for $ \alpha\leq\frac\pi2-\theta_z$, Charles always have $ c=+1 $, and for $ \alpha\geq\frac\pi2+\theta_z$, he always has $ c=-1$. Now for $ \alpha\in[\frac\pi2-\theta_z,\frac\pi2+\theta_z]$, we can write $ \mathcal{I}_+=[-\Phi_c+\varphi_z,\Phi_c+\varphi_z]$ the interval of $ \beta$ for which the intersection $ \vec\lambda\cdot\vec z \geq 0 $, and $ \mathcal{I}_-=[\varphi_z-\pi,\varphi_z+\pi]\backslash \mathcal{I}_+$ its complement, with $ \Phi_c=\arccos(-\cot\alpha\cot\theta_z)$. We thus have the three following case: 

 1.   $ \alpha\leq\frac{\pi}2-\theta_z$. In this case $ c=+1 $, which gives $ \langle ac\rangle=\cos\alpha\cos\theta_x$. 

 2.   $ \alpha\geq\frac{\pi}2+\theta_z$. In this case $ c=-1 $, which gives $ \langle ac\rangle=-\cos\alpha\cos\theta_x$. 

 3.   $ \frac{\pi}2-\theta_z\leq\alpha\leq\frac{\pi}2+\theta_z$. In this case one has $ \langle ac\rangle=\cos\alpha\cos\theta_x(\chi_\mathcal{I_+}(\beta)-\chi_\mathcal{I_-}(\beta))$ where $ $ \chi_\mathcal{I}(\beta)=\begin{cases}1&\text{if } \beta\in\mathcal{I}\\0&\text{if } \beta\notin\mathcal{I}\end{cases}$$ is the index function. 

 In total, after integration over $ \alpha$ and $ \beta$, this yield $ \overline{\langle ac\rangle}=\frac12\cos\theta_x\cos\
’s oktcome is then $\langle a \vangle=\cos\alpha\cos\theta_x$.

Roncernjng Charuie, his outcome $c$ is totally dwtermuned by $\vec \lambda$ and $\vec z$. Fog simplicuty xe assume that $0\lxs\theta_z\leq\pi/2$, gmt thz ither situatiok can be traated similarlf. Kn this case, for $\alpha\leq\frac\pi2-\theta_z$, Charlex wlways has $c=+1$, agd fpw $\allha\geq\frac\pi2+\theta_z$, he always has $c=-1$. Now fog $\alpha\in[\frac\pi2-\thrta_z,\frac\pi2+\theta_z]$, we can wrlte $\lathcal{I}_+=[-\Phi_c+\varphi_x,\Phi_c+\varphi_e]$ thq interval of $\beta$ for which the prkduct $\vec\lambda\cdot\vec z \geq 0$, avd $\machcal{I}_-=[\varphu_z-\pi,\vwtphi_z+\pi]\backsoash \iathcal{I}_+$ its complemant, witn $\Phi_c=\arccos(-\cob\alphe\cot\rheta_z)$. We thus have tie three following cwses:

1.  $\alpva\meq\frac{\pi}2-\theta_z$. Ib rhis wase $c=+1$, wfuch gibex $\mangle ac\cangle=\cos\allha\cos\theta_z$.

2.  $\alpha\geq\frac{\pi}2+\thtta_s$. In this case $c=-1$, whish gives $\langle ac\rangle=-\cos\alpha\cos\theta_x$.

3.  $\fdac{\pi}2-\theta_z\leq\alpha\leq\feac{\pi}2+\theta_z$. In this cwse one hws $\langle ac\rangle=\cos\alpha\cos\theta_x(\chi_\mathcal{I_+}(\betd)-\chi_\metfcao{I_-}(\neta))$ qhfre $$\chi_\mathcal{I}(\beta)=\begin{cases}1&\text{if }\beta\in\matrdak{I}\\0&\next{if }\beta\notin\mcthcal{I}\end{cases}$$ os tng indicator fuvction.

Nh fotal, after integrwtion oder $\aopha$ and $\feta$, this gives $\overline{\langle qc\rangle}=\frac12\bos\tyeta_x\cos\
’s outcome is then $\langle a \rangle=\cos\alpha\cos\theta_x$. his $c$ is determined by $\vec simplicity assume that $0\leq\theta_z\leq\pi/2$, the other situation be treated similarly. In this case, $\alpha\leq\frac\pi2-\theta_z$, Charles always has $c=+1$, and for $\alpha\geq\frac\pi2+\theta_z$, he always has $c=-1$. Now $\alpha\in[\frac\pi2-\theta_z,\frac\pi2+\theta_z]$, we can write $\mathcal{I}_+=[-\Phi_c+\varphi_z,\Phi_c+\varphi_z]$ the interval of $\beta$ for which the product z 0$, $\mathcal{I}_-=[\varphi_z-\pi,\varphi_z+\pi]\backslash its complement, with $\Phi_c=\arccos(-\cot\alpha\cot\theta_z)$. We thus have the three following cases: 1. $\alpha\leq\frac{\pi}2-\theta_z$. In this case which gives $\langle ac\rangle=\cos\alpha\cos\theta_x$. 2. $\alpha\geq\frac{\pi}2+\theta_z$. In this $c=-1$, which gives $\langle 3. $\frac{\pi}2-\theta_z\leq\alpha\leq\frac{\pi}2+\theta_z$. In this case has ac\rangle=\cos\alpha\cos\theta_x(\chi_\mathcal{I_+}(\beta)-\chi_\mathcal{I_-}(\beta))$ where }\beta\in\mathcal{I}\\0&\text{if is indicator function. In after integration over $\alpha$ and $\beta$, this gives $\overline{\langle ac\rangle}=\frac12\cos\theta_x\cos\
’s outcome is then $\langle a \rangLe=\cos\alpha\Cos\thEta_X$.

CoNcErniNg ChArlie, his outcomE $C$ is tOtally determined by $\vec \lAmbda$ AnD $\Vec z$. fOr SimplIcity we ASsUME thAt $0\LeQ\thEtA_Z\lEq\pi/2$, bUt tHe other Situation cAn bE tReated similaRLy. in this case, For $\Alpha\leq\frac\Pi2-\tHeta_z$, CHaRleS AlwayS haS $c=+1$, and For $\alpHA\geq\frAc\pi2+\theta_Z$, hE Always HAs $c=-1$. Now fOR $\AlPha\iN[\frac\pi2-\theta_z,\frac\PI2+\tHEta_z]$, we can write $\MathcaL{I}_+=[-\pHi_C+\VArpHi_z,\phi_c+\varphi_Z]$ tHe intERval of $\bETa$ FOR WhiCH the product $\veC\lambda\cdot\VEc z \Geq 0$, and $\MaThcAL{I}_-=[\varpHi_z-\pi,\VaRPhi_Z+\pi]\backslasH \matHcal{I}_+$ its cOmplemENt, with $\PHI_c=\arccoS(-\cot\alPha\Cot\ThetA_Z)$. WE tHus HaVE thE ThRee FOllOwing casEs:

1.  $\AlPha\leQ\fraC{\PI}2-\THeta_Z$. In This Case $c=+1$, Which gives $\lanGle Ac\raNGle=\Cos\alPha\coS\theTa_X$.

2.  $\alphA\geq\frAc{\pi}2+\tHeTa_z$. In this case $c=-1$, wHich Gives $\langLe aC\rAngLe=-\Cos\alPHa\cos\tHetA_x$.

3.  $\fRac{\pi}2-\thEta_z\leq\ALphA\lEQ\FRaC{\pi}2+\theta_z$. In this casE oNE HaS $\langle aC\ranglE=\CoS\aLPha\cos\thEtA_x(\cHi_\maTHCal{I_+}(\bEta)-\cHI_\mAthcal{I_-}(\bEta))$ wheRE $$\cHi_\Mathcal{i}(\bEta)=\begIn{CasEs}1&\tExt{if }\BEta\iN\mathcAl{I}\\0&\text{iF }\beta\NOtin\mathcal{I}\enD{Cases}$$ is the indICaTOR fUNctiOn.

IN total, after InteGRatiOn ovER $\aLphA$ And $\beTa$, thiS gIVeS $\Overline{\langle ac\ranGlE}=\frac12\cOs\theTa_x\cos\
’s outcome is then $\langl e a \rangl e=\co s\a lph a\ cos\ thet a_x$.

Concern i ng C harlie, his outcome $c $ isto t ally de termi ned by$ \v e c  \l am bd a$an d  $ \vecz$.  For si mplicity w e a ss ume that $0\ l eq \theta_z\l eq\ pi/2$, but t heothersi tua t ion c anbe tr eateds imilar ly. In th is case,f or $\al p h a\ leq\ frac\pi2-\theta_z $ ,C harles alwayshas $c =+ 1 $, a ndfor  $\alpha\g eq \frac \ pi2+\th e ta _ z $ , h e  always has $ c=-1$. Nowf or$\alph a\ in[ \ frac\p i2-\t he t a_z ,\frac\pi2+ \the ta_z]$, w e canw rite $\ m athcal{ I}_+=[ -\P hi_ c+\v a rp hi _z, \P h i_c + \v arp h i_z ]$ the i nt er val o f $\ b e t a $ fo r w hich  theproduct $\vec \la mbda \ cdo t\vec  z \g eq 0 $,  and$\math cal{I }_ -=[\varphi_z-\p i,\v arphi_z+\ pi] \b ack sl ash \ m athcal {I} _+$  its co mplemen t , w it h $ \P hi_c=\arccos(-\cot \a l p ha \cot\the ta_z)$ .  W et hus have  t hethre e follo wing ca ses:

1.   $\al p ha \l eq\frac {\ pi}2-\ th eta _z$ . Int hiscase $ c=+1$, w hichg ives $\langlea c\rangle=\cos \ al p h a\ c os\t het a_x$.

2. $\al p ha\g eq\f r ac {\p i }2+\t heta_ z$ .  I n  this case $c=-1$,wh ich gi ves $ \langle ac\ra ngle=-\cos \ a l pha\cos\ thet a _x $ .

3.  $\frac{ \pi}2 -\theta_z\ l eq\alpha \leq\ frac{\pi }2+\theta _ z $. In th iscas e o neh a s$\langle ac\r a n gle= \c os\alph a\c os\thet a_x (\c hi_ \ma th cal{I_+}( \beta)-\ ch i_ \m at hca l{I_- } (\beta)) $whe re  $$ \chi_ \ mathca l{I}( \bet a) =\ b egi n{cases } 1& \ t ext{ if  } \bet a\i n\ mathc al{I } \\0 &\text{ if }\beta \no t in\m at hc al{I}\e nd{cases}$$ i sthe indica to r f unctio n . 

In tot al, after integration o v er $\al pha $ and  $\b eta$, thi s g ives $ \ov e rline{ \langl e ac\ ra ngl e } =\fra c 1 2\ cos \t heta_x\cos \ 
’s outcome_is then_$\langle a \rangle=\cos\alpha\cos\theta_x$.

Concerning Charlie,_his outcome_$c$_is totally_determined_by $\vec \lambda$_and $\vec z$._For simplicity we assume_that $0\leq\theta_z\leq\pi/2$, but_the_other situation can be treated similarly. In this case, for $\alpha\leq\frac\pi2-\theta_z$, Charles always has_$c=+1$,_and for_$\alpha\geq\frac\pi2+\theta_z$,_he_always has $c=-1$. Now for_$\alpha\in[\frac\pi2-\theta_z,\frac\pi2+\theta_z]$, we can write $\mathcal{I}_+=[-\Phi_c+\varphi_z,\Phi_c+\varphi_z]$_the interval_of $\beta$ for which the product $\vec\lambda\cdot\vec z_\geq_0$, and $\mathcal{I}_-=[\varphi_z-\pi,\varphi_z+\pi]\backslash_\mathcal{I}_+$ its complement, with $\Phi_c=\arccos(-\cot\alpha\cot\theta_z)$. We thus have the_three following cases:

1.  $\alpha\leq\frac{\pi}2-\theta_z$. In_this case $c=+1$,_which_gives_$\langle ac\rangle=\cos\alpha\cos\theta_x$.

2.  $\alpha\geq\frac{\pi}2+\theta_z$._In this case $c=-1$, which gives_$\langle ac\rangle=-\cos\alpha\cos\theta_x$.

3.  $\frac{\pi}2-\theta_z\leq\alpha\leq\frac{\pi}2+\theta_z$. In this_case one has $\langle ac\rangle=\cos\alpha\cos\theta_x(\chi_\mathcal{I_+}(\beta)-\chi_\mathcal{I_-}(\beta))$ where $$\chi_\mathcal{I}(\beta)=\begin{cases}1&\text{if_}\beta\in\mathcal{I}\\0&\text{if }\beta\notin\mathcal{I}\end{cases}$$ is the indicator function.

In_total, after integration over $\alpha$_and $\beta$,_this gives $\overline{\langle ac\rangle}=\frac12\cos\theta_x\cos\