v\cos(\theta))-v\cos(\theta)}=\frac{nL}{c}+\frac{v\cos(\theta)L}{c^2}+..
\label{eqn:traveltime2}$$ on using (\[eqn:Fresnel\]) and expanding to 1st oder in $v/c$. If we ignore the Fresnel drag term in (\[eqn:Fresnel\]) we obtain, instead, $$t_{AB}\approx \frac{L}{c/n-v\cos(\theta)}=\frac{nL}{c}+\frac{n^2v\cos(\theta)L}{c^2}+..
\label{eqn:traveltime3}$$ The 1st important observation is that the $v/c$ component in (\[eqn:traveltime2\]) is independent of the dielectric refractive index $n$. This is explained in the next section. If the clocks were synchronised $t_{AB}$ would be known, and by changing direction of the light path, that is varying $\theta$, the magnitude of the 2nd term may be separated from the magnitude of the 1st term. If the clocks are not synchronised, then the measured travel time ${\overline t}_{AB}=(t_B+\tau)-t_A=t_{AB}+\tau$, where $\tau$ is the unknown, but fixed, offset between the two clocks. But this does not change the above argument. The magnitude of $v$ and the direction of $v$ can be determined by varying $\theta$. For a small detector the change in $\theta$ can be achieved by a direct rotation. But for a large detector, such as De Witte’s [@DeWitte] 1.5km RF coaxial cable experiment, the rotation was achieved by that of the earth. The reason for using opposing propagation directions, as in Fig.\[fig:oneway\], and then measuring travel time differences, is that local temperature effects cancel. This is because a common temperature change in the two adjacent cables changes the speed to the same extent, whereas absolute motion effects cause opposite signed speed changes. Then the temperature effects cancel on measuring differences in the travel times, whereas absolute motion effects are additive. Finally, after the absolute motion velocity has been determined, the two spatially separated clocks may be synchronised.

That the $v/c$ term in $t_{AB}$ in (\[eqn:traveltime2\]) is independent of $n$ means that various techniques to do a 1st order
v\cos(\theta))-v\cos(\theta)}=\frac{nL}{c}+\frac{v\cos(\theta)L}{c^2}+.. 
 \label{eqn: traveltime2}$$ on using (\[eqn: Fresnel\ ]) and expanding to 1st oder in $ v / c$. If we dismiss the Fresnel puff term in (\[eqn: Fresnel\ ]) we obtain, alternatively, $ $ t_{AB}\approx \frac{L}{c / n - v\cos(\theta)}=\frac{nL}{c}+\frac{n^2v\cos(\theta)L}{c^2}+.. 
 \label{eqn: traveltime3}$$ The first important observation is that the $ v / c$ part in (\[eqn: traveltime2\ ]) is autonomous of the dielectric refractive index $ n$. This is explained in the next section. If the clock were synchronised $ t_{AB}$ would be known, and by change direction of the light path, that is varying $ \theta$, the magnitude of the 2nd condition may be separated from the magnitude of the 1st terminus. If the clocks are not synchronised, then the measured travel clock time $ { \overline t}_{AB}=(t_B+\tau)-t_A = t_{AB}+\tau$, where $ \tau$ is the unknown, but fixed, offset between the two clocks. But this does not change the above controversy. The magnitude of $ v$ and the direction of $ v$ can be determined by varying $ \theta$. For a small detector the change in $ \theta$ can be achieved by a direct rotation. But for a large detector, such as De Witte ’s [ @DeWitte ] 1.5 km RF coaxial cable experiment, the rotation was achieved by that of the earth. The reason for using opposing propagation focus, as in Fig.\[fig: oneway\ ], and then measuring travel prison term dispute, is that local temperature effects cancel. This is because a common temperature variety in the two adjacent cables exchange the speed to the same extent, whereas absolute apparent motion effects cause opposite signed speed changes. Then the temperature effect cancel on measuring differences in the travel meter, whereas absolute gesture effects are additive. Finally, after the absolute motion velocity has been settle, the two spatially separated clocks may be synchronised. 

 That the $ five / c$ term in $ t_{AB}$ in (\[eqn: traveltime2\ ]) is independent of $ n$ means that various proficiency to do a first order
v\cod(\theta))-v\cos(\theta)}=\frac{nL}{c}+\frxc{v\cos(\theta)L}{c^2}+..
\laywl{eqn:tcaveltije2}$$ on uskng (\[eqn:Fresnel\]) and expanding ti 1st ider in $v/c$. If we ignord the Frednel drat tecm in (\[eqn:Fresnel\]) we obtalu, insfcad, $$t_{CB}\epprox \frac{L}{c/n-v\gos(\theta)}=\fraw{nL}{c}+\frac{n^2v\cos(\tvega)P}{c^2}+..
\label{eqn:traveltime3}$$ The 1st importagt obsetvwtion is that jhe $v/b$ sompknent in (\[eqn:traveltime2\]) is independsnt of uhe dielectric reftactive index $n$. This is exolaijed in the next seftion. If thg cljxks were synzhronised $u_{AY}$ would be inown, and by changing direction of tke light pajk, thwj is varying $\thetw$, the magnitmce of dhe 2nd yerm may be seiaratxd feom the magnitude of vhe 1st term. If the cjocks are nkt synchronised, tyeb the meavurea trxvem vims ${\overpinx t}_{AB}=(t_B+\tau)-t_Z=t_{AB}+\tau$, wheee $\tau$ is the unknoen, vut fixed, offaet beewqen the two clocks. But this does not chdngs the above argument. Thw magnitude of $v$ and jhe directyon of $v$ can be determined by varying $\theta$. For a smalm deuegbor gye change in $\theta$ can be achieved by a direct wktstpon. But for a larne detector, such ax Fe Ritte’s [@DeWittg] 1.5km RF cozxial cable experilent, thg rotarion was wchirved by that of the earth. Tye reason fog usung opposing propayation direccions, ss in Fig.\[fig:oneway\], and then oeashring travep time dirwerences, is that lobal demperature effects cancel. This is uecauxe a coomon tempewature chajge ik the two adjacent fabled whanges thf speed to the same extent, wherxes absolute mpthon effects causc opposite signqd speed changgs. Then tke temoerature erfects rancel on mewsuring diffesgnces in the vravel tiies, qherwas absuuute motion efgects are additive. Dinally, after the ebsouhte motion veloenti has been detetmived, tje trm spatially vepafatdc clozks may be whnchtonised.

That the $v/c$ tarm jn $t_{AB}$ in (\[eqn:travektlme2\]) is ineependene of $n$ means yhat various technlques to do a 1st order
v\cos(\theta))-v\cos(\theta)}=\frac{nL}{c}+\frac{v\cos(\theta)L}{c^2}+.. \label{eqn:traveltime2}$$ on using (\[eqn:Fresnel\]) and expanding oder $v/c$. If ignore the Fresnel obtain, $$t_{AB}\approx \frac{L}{c/n-v\cos(\theta)}=\frac{nL}{c}+\frac{n^2v\cos(\theta)L}{c^2}+.. \label{eqn:traveltime3}$$ 1st important observation that the $v/c$ component in (\[eqn:traveltime2\]) independent of the dielectric refractive index $n$. This is explained in the next If the clocks were synchronised $t_{AB}$ would be known, and by changing direction the path, is $\theta$, the magnitude of the 2nd term may be separated from the magnitude of the 1st If the clocks are not synchronised, then the travel time ${\overline t}_{AB}=(t_B+\tau)-t_A=t_{AB}+\tau$, $\tau$ is the unknown, but offset the two But does change the above The magnitude of $v$ and the direction of $v$ can be determined by varying $\theta$. For a detector the $\theta$ can achieved a rotation. But for detector, such as De Witte’s [@DeWitte] cable experiment, the rotation was achieved by that the earth. reason for using opposing propagation directions, in Fig.\[fig:oneway\], and then measuring travel time differences, that local temperature effects cancel. This is because a common temperature change in the two changes the speed to same extent, whereas motion cause signed changes. Then temperature effects cancel on measuring differences in the travel times, whereas motion effects are additive. Finally, after the absolute motion velocity determined, two spatially separated may be synchronised. That $v/c$ in $t_{AB}$ in (\[eqn:traveltime2\]) of means to a order
v\cos(\theta))-v\cos(\theta)}=\frac{nL}{c}+\Frac{v\cos(\thEta)L}{c^2}+..
\LabEl{eQn:TravEltiMe2}$$ on using (\[eqn:FrESnel\]) And expanding to 1st oder in $V/c$. If wE iGNore THe fresnEl drag tERm IN (\[Eqn:frEsNel\]) We OBtAin, inSteAd, $$t_{AB}\apProx \frac{L}{c/N-v\cOs(\Theta)}=\frac{nL}{c}+\FRaC{n^2v\cos(\thetA)L}{c^2}+..
\Label{eqn:travEltIme3}$$ The 1St ImpORtant ObsErvatIon is tHAt the $v/C$ componenT iN (\[Eqn:traVEltime2\]) iS INdEpenDent of the dielectrIC rEFractive index $n$. this is ExPLaINEd iN thE next sectiOn. if the CLocks weRE sYNCHroNIsed $t_{AB}$ would bE known, and by CHanGing diReCtiON of the Light PaTH, thAt is varying $\ThetA$, the magniTude of THe 2nd terM May be seParateD frOm tHe maGNiTuDe oF tHE 1st TErM. If THe cLocks are NoT sYnchrOnisED, THEn thE meAsurEd traVel time ${\overliNe t}_{aB}=(t_B+\TAu)-t_a=t_{AB}+\tAu$, wheRe $\taU$ iS the uNknown, But fiXeD, offset between tHe twO clocks. BuT thIs DoeS nOt chaNGe the aBovE arGument. THe magniTUde Of $V$ AND tHe direction of $v$ can bE dETErMined by vArying $\THeTa$. fOr a small DeTecTor tHE ChangE in $\tHEtA$ can be acHieved BY a DiRect rotAtIon. But FoR a lArgE deteCTor, sUch as DE Witte’s [@DEWittE] 1.5Km RF coaxial cabLE experiment, thE RoTATiON was AchIeved by that Of thE EartH. The REaSon FOr usiNg oppOsINg PRopagation directionS, aS in Fig.\[Fig:onEway\], and then meAsuring traVEL Time diffErenCEs, IS that local tempEratuRe effects cANcel. This Is becAuse a comMon temperATUre changE in The Two AdjACEnT cables changeS THe spEeD to the sAme Extent, wHerEas AbsOluTe Motion effEcts causE oPpOsItE siGned sPEed changEs. theN tHe tEmperATure efFects CancEl On MEasUring diFFeRENces In ThE traVel TiMes, whEreaS AbsOlute moTion effecTs aRE addItIvE. FinallY, after the absoLuTe motion veLoCitY has beEN DeterminEd, the two spatially separaTEd clockS maY be syNchrOnised.

ThaT thE $v/c$ terM in $T_{aB}$ in (\[eqN:traveLtime2\]) Is IndEPEndenT OF $n$ MeaNs That variouS TEchNiqueS tO do a 1St order
v\cos(\theta))-v\cos(\thet a)}=\frac{ nL}{c }+\ fra c{ v\co s(\t heta)L}{c^2}+. . 
\la bel{eqn:traveltime2}$$  on u si n g (\ [ eq n:Fre snel\]) an d exp an di ngto 1s t ode r i n $v/c$ . If we ig nor ethe Fresneld ra g term in(\[ eqn:Fresnel\ ])we obt ai n,i nstea d,$$t_{ AB}\ap p rox \f rac{L}{c/ n- v \cos(\ t heta)}= \ f ra c{nL }{c}+\frac{n^2v\c o s( \ theta)L}{c^2}+ ..
\la be l {e q n :tr ave ltime3}$$Th e 1st importa n to b s erv a tion is thatthe $v/c$ c o mpo nent i n(\[ e qn:tra velti me 2 \])  is indepen dent  of the d ielect r ic refr a ctive i ndex $ n$.  Th is i s  e xp lai ne d  in th e n e xtsection.  I fthe c lock s w e re s ync hron ised$t_{AB}$ woul d b e kn o wn,  andby ch angi ng  dire ctionof th elight path, tha t is  varying$\t he ta$ ,the m a gnitud e o f t he 2ndterm ma y  be  s e p a ra ted from the magni tu d e  o f the 1s t term .  I ft he clock sare  not s ynchr onis e d,  then th e meas u re dtravelti me ${\ ov erl ine  t}_{ A B}=( t_B+\t au)-t_A= t_{AB } +\tau$, where$ \tau$ is theu nk n o wn ,  but  fi xed, offset  bet w eenthet wo  cl o cks.But t hi s  d o es not change the a bo ve arg ument . The magnitu de of $v$a n d  the dir ecti o no f $v$ can be d eterm ined by va r ying $\t heta$ . For asmall det e c tor thecha nge  in  $\ t h et a$ can be ach i e vedby  a dire ctrotatio n.But  fo r a  l arge dete ctor, su ch  a sDe  Wi tte’s [@DeWitt e]  1. 5k m R F coa x ial ca ble e xper im en t , t he rota t io n wasac hi eved  by  t hat o f th e  ea rth. Th e reasonfor usin gop posingpropagation d ir ections, a sinFig.\[ f i g:oneway \], and then measuringt ravel t ime  diff eren ces, is t hat  local  te m peratu re eff ectsca nce l .  This i sbec au se a commo n tem perat ur e ch ange in  the two adjacentc abl es changes th e s peed t othe sa m e e xt e nt, w hereas absolute  motion ef fe c ts  cause opp o sit esignedspeed c hange s . Thenthe tempe rature ef fe ctsc a nce l on measu ring dif ferencesi n the tr aveltim es, wh er eas  abso lute m o tio n eff ects a re  addit ive.Fi nally, a fter the absolute motio n velo cityhas  been det erm i ned , the two  spa tially sep ara ted  cloc ksm ay be  syn c hr oni s ed.
That the $v/c$ te rmi n  $ t_{AB}$ in( \ [ eqn :trav elt i me2\])  isindependent of $n $  means that va riou s tec hni q uesto  do a 1st orde r
v\cos(\theta))-v\cos(\theta)}=\frac{nL}{c}+\frac{v\cos(\theta)L}{c^2}+..
\label{eqn:traveltime2}$$ on_using (\[eqn:Fresnel\])_and expanding to 1st_oder in_$v/c$._If we_ignore_the Fresnel drag_term in (\[eqn:Fresnel\])_we obtain, instead, $$t_{AB}\approx_\frac{L}{c/n-v\cos(\theta)}=\frac{nL}{c}+\frac{n^2v\cos(\theta)L}{c^2}+..
\label{eqn:traveltime3}$$ The 1st_important_observation is that the $v/c$ component in (\[eqn:traveltime2\]) is independent of the dielectric refractive_index_$n$. This_is_explained_in the next section. If_the clocks were synchronised $t_{AB}$_would be_known, and by changing direction of the light_path,_that is varying_$\theta$, the magnitude of the 2nd term may be_separated from the magnitude of the_1st term. If_the_clocks_are not synchronised, then_the measured travel time ${\overline t}_{AB}=(t_B+\tau)-t_A=t_{AB}+\tau$,_where $\tau$ is the unknown, but_fixed, offset between the two clocks. But_this does not change the above_argument. The magnitude of $v$_and the_direction of $v$ can be_determined by varying_$\theta$. For_a small detector_the change in $\theta$ can be_achieved by a_direct rotation. But for a large_detector,_such as De_Witte’s_[@DeWitte]_1.5km RF_coaxial cable experiment,_the_rotation was_achieved_by that of the earth. The_reason_for using opposing propagation directions, as in_Fig.\[fig:oneway\], and then measuring_travel_time differences, is that_local temperature effects cancel. This_is because a common temperature change_in the_two adjacent_cables changes the speed to the same extent, whereas absolute motion_effects cause opposite signed speed changes._Then the temperature effects_cancel on_measuring_differences in the_travel_times, whereas_absolute motion effects are additive. Finally, after_the absolute_motion velocity has been determined, the_two spatially separated clocks_may_be synchronised.

That the $v/c$ term in_$t_{AB}$ in (\[eqn:traveltime2\]) is independent of_$n$ means that various techniques_to_do_a 1st order