iness measure [@Kim2016Measuring]: $$B_n \equiv \frac{\sqrt{n+1}\sigma - \sqrt{n-1}\langle\tau\rangle}{(\sqrt{n+1}-2)\sigma + \sqrt{n-1}\langle\tau\rangle},$$ which can have the value of $1$ ($0$) in the extremely bursty case (in the Poisson process) for any $n$.

\(iv) The correlations between IETs have been characterized by several measures [@Karsai2018Bursty]. Among them, we focus on the memory coefficient and bursty train sizes. The memory coefficient $M$ is defined as the Pearson correlation coefficient between two consecutive IETs, whose value for a sequence of $n$ IETs, i.e., $\{\tau_i\}_{i=1,\cdots,n}$, can be estimated by [@Goh2008Burstiness] $$M \equiv\frac{1}{n - 1}\sum_{i=1}^{n-1}\frac{(\tau_i - \langle\tau\rangle_1)(\tau_{i+1} - \langle\tau\rangle_2)}{\sigma_1 \sigma_2},
    \label{eq:memory_original}$$ where $\langle\tau\rangle_1$ ($\langle\tau\rangle_2$) and $\sigma_1$ ($\sigma_2$) are the average and the standard deviation of the first (last) $n-1$ IETs, respectively. Positive $M$ implies that the small (large) IETs tend to be followed by small (large) IETs. Negative $M$ implies the opposite tendency, while $M=0$ is for the uncorrelated IETs. In many empirical analyses, positive $M$ has been observed [@Goh2008Burstiness; @Wang2015Temporal; @Guo2017Bounds; @Bottcher2017Temporal].

\(v) Another notion for measuring the correlations between IETs is the bursty trains [@Karsai2012Universal]. A bursty train is defined as a set of consecutive events such that IETs between any two consecutive events in the bursty train are less than or equal to a given time window $\Delta t$, while those between events in different bursty trains are larger than $\Delta t$. The number of events in the bursty train is called
iness measure   [ @Kim2016Measuring ]: $ $ B_n \equiv \frac{\sqrt{n+1}\sigma - \sqrt{n-1}\langle\tau\rangle}{(\sqrt{n+1}-2)\sigma + \sqrt{n-1}\langle\tau\rangle},$$ which can have the value of $ 1 $ ($ 0 $) in the extremely bursty case (in the Poisson procedure) for any $ n$. 

 \(iv) The correlation between IETs have been characterized by several measures   [ @Karsai2018Bursty ]. Among them, we concenter on the memory coefficient and bursty train sizes. The memory coefficient $ M$ is define as the Pearson correlation coefficient coefficient between two consecutive IETs, whose value for a sequence of $ n$ IETs, i.e., $ \{\tau_i\}_{i=1,\cdots, n}$, can be estimated by   [ @Goh2008Burstiness ] $ $ M \equiv\frac{1}{n - 1}\sum_{i=1}^{n-1}\frac{(\tau_i - \langle\tau\rangle_1)(\tau_{i+1 } - \langle\tau\rangle_2)}{\sigma_1 \sigma_2 }, 
     \label{eq: memory_original}$$ where $ \langle\tau\rangle_1 $ ($ \langle\tau\rangle_2 $) and $ \sigma_1 $ ($ \sigma_2 $) are the average and the standard diversion of the first (last) $ n-1 $ IETs, respectively. Positive $ M$ implies that the belittled (large) IETs tend to be followed by small (large) IETs. Negative $ M$ imply the opposite tendency, while $ M=0 $ is for the uncorrelated IETs. In many empirical analysis, positive $ M$ has been observed   [ @Goh2008Burstiness; @Wang2015Temporal; @Guo2017Bounds; @Bottcher2017Temporal ]. 

 \(v) Another notion for measuring the correlation between IETs is the bursty trains   [ @Karsai2012Universal ]. A bursty train is defined as a set of consecutive event such that IETs between any two consecutive events in the bursty train are less than or equal to a given time window $ \Delta t$, while those between events in different bursty trains are larger than $ \Delta t$. The number of events in the bursty train is called
ineds measure [@Kim2016Measuring]: $$B_k \equiv \frac{\sqrt{u+1}\wigma - \sqrt{n-1}\mangle\taj\rangle}{(\sqrt{n+1}-2)\sigma + \sqrt{n-1}\langpe\rau\rabgle},$$ which can have thd value ov $1$ ($0$) in tye eetremely bursty rzse (in bke Pojdson 'rocess) for any $n$.

\(iv) The cmrrelations bedwdeu IETs have been characterized by sederal mradures [@Karsai2018Burfty]. Siong nhtm, we focus on the memory coefficjent anv bursty train xizes. The memory coefficiejt $M$ is defined as the Pearson cotdelwrion coeffickent betwetn two consedutive IETs, whose value for a sdquenee of $n$ IETw, u.e., $\{\hdu_i\}_{i=1,\cdots,n}$, ran be estimated bn [@Boh2008Burvtiness] $$M \equiv\frac{1}{n - 1}\suk_{i=1}^{n-1}\drac{(\tau_i - \langle\tau\raigle_1)(\tau_{i+1} - \langle\tau\rwngle_2)}{\sigmd_1 \aigma_2},
    \label{eq:mwmiry_orhgindl}$$ wfwre $\lahgke\fau\ranhle_1$ ($\langle\tau\dangle_2$) and $\wigma_1$ ($\sigma_2$) are the advtage and the standwrq deviation of the first (last) $n-1$ IETs, revpedtively. Positive $M$ implues that the small (latge) IETs tqnd to be followed by small (large) IETs. Negative $M$ implmer tkc upplsite tendency, while $M=0$ is for the uncorrelateq ITTs. In many empirlcal analyses, posiyige $I$ has been obrerved [@Ykh2008Gurstiness; @Wang2015Temooral; @Goo2017Bounes; @Bottchtr2017Temloral].

\(v) Another notion for mwasuring the xorrelations betwezn IETs is tke burxty ttains [@Karsai2012Universal]. A yursty train is dffined as x set of consecugivv evants such that IETs betweeg any two conxecutivd evgnts in the burstj tralt are less than or equap do a given time window $\Delta t$, while thosx between evemtv it differznt buvsty trains are larger than $\Dglta t$. Thz numbdr of evenns in the bursty trayn is called
iness measure [@Kim2016Measuring]: $$B_n \equiv \frac{\sqrt{n+1}\sigma - \sqrt{n-1}\langle\tau\rangle},$$ can have value of $1$ case the Poisson process) any $n$. \(iv) correlations between IETs have been characterized several measures [@Karsai2018Bursty]. Among them, we focus on the memory coefficient and bursty sizes. The memory coefficient $M$ is defined as the Pearson correlation coefficient between consecutive whose for sequence of $n$ IETs, i.e., $\{\tau_i\}_{i=1,\cdots,n}$, can be estimated by [@Goh2008Burstiness] $$M \equiv\frac{1}{n - 1}\sum_{i=1}^{n-1}\frac{(\tau_i - - \langle\tau\rangle_2)}{\sigma_1 \sigma_2}, \label{eq:memory_original}$$ where $\langle\tau\rangle_1$ ($\langle\tau\rangle_2$) and ($\sigma_2$) are the average the standard deviation of the (last) IETs, respectively. $M$ that small (large) IETs to be followed by small (large) IETs. Negative $M$ implies the opposite tendency, while $M=0$ is for uncorrelated IETs. empirical analyses, $M$ been [@Goh2008Burstiness; @Wang2015Temporal; @Guo2017Bounds; Another notion for measuring the correlations the bursty trains [@Karsai2012Universal]. A bursty train is as a of consecutive events such that IETs any two consecutive events in the bursty train less than or equal to a given time window $\Delta t$, while those between events bursty trains are larger $\Delta t$. The of in bursty is called
iness measure [@Kim2016Measuring]: $$B_N \equiv \frac{\Sqrt{n+1}\SigMa - \sQrT{n-1}\laNgle\Tau\rangle}{(\sqrt{n+1}-2)\SIgma + \Sqrt{n-1}\langle\tau\rangle},$$ whIch caN hAVe thE VaLue of $1$ ($0$) In the exTReMELy bUrStY caSe (IN tHe PoiSsoN procesS) for any $n$.

\(iv) the CoRrelations beTWeEn IETs have BeeN characterizEd bY severAl MeaSUres [@KArsAi2018BurSty]. AmoNG them, wE focus on tHe MEmory cOEfficieNT AnD burSty train sizes. The mEMoRY coefficient $M$ iS definEd AS tHE peaRsoN correlatiOn CoeffICient beTWeEN TWo cONsecutive IETs, Whose value fOR a sEquencE oF $n$ Iets, i.e., $\{\taU_i\}_{i=1,\cdOtS,N}$, caN be estimateD by [@GOh2008BurstinEss] $$M \eqUIv\frac{1}{n - 1}\SUm_{i=1}^{n-1}\fraC{(\tau_i - \lAngLe\tAu\raNGlE_1)(\tAu_{i+1} - \LaNGle\TAu\RanGLe_2)}{\sIgma_1 \sigmA_2},
    \lAbEl{eq:mEmorY_ORIGinaL}$$ whEre $\lAngle\Tau\rangle_1$ ($\langLe\tAu\raNGle_2$) And $\siGma_1$ ($\siGma_2$) aRe The avErage aNd the StAndard deviation Of thE first (lasT) $n-1$ IeTS, reSpEctivELy. PosiTivE $M$ iMplies tHat the sMAll (LaRGE) iEts tend to be followed By SMAlL (large) IEts. NegaTIvE $M$ IMplies thE oPpoSite TENdencY, whiLE $M=0$ Is for the UncorrELaTeD IETs. In MaNy empiRiCal AnaLyses, POsitIve $M$ haS been obsErved [@gOh2008Burstiness; @WaNG2015Temporal; @Guo2017BOUnDS; @boTTcheR2017TeMporal].

\(v) AnotHer nOTion For mEAsUriNG the cOrrelAtIOnS Between IETs is the burStY trainS [@KarsAi2012Universal]. A bUrsty train IS DEfined as A set OF cONsecutive eventS such That IETs beTWeen any tWo conSecutive Events in tHE Bursty trAin Are LesS thAN Or Equal to a given TIMe wiNdOw $\Delta T$, whIle thosE beTweEn eVenTs In differeNt bursty TrAiNs ArE laRger tHAn $\Delta t$. thE nuMbEr oF evenTS in the BurstY traIn Is CAllEd
iness measure [@Kim2016Mea suring]: $ $B_n\eq uiv  \ frac {\sq rt{n+1}\sigma-  \sq rt{n-1}\langle\tau\ran gle}{ (\ s qrt{ n +1 }-2)\ sigma + \s q r t{n -1 }\ lan gl e \t au\ra ngl e},$$ w hich can h ave  t he value of$ 1$  ($0$) inthe  extremely b urs ty cas e(in the P ois son p rocess )  for a ny $n$.
\( i v) The correla t i on s be tween IETs have b e en characterizedby sev er a lm e asu res  [@Karsai2 01 8Burs t y]. Amo n gt h e m,w e focus on th e memory co e ffi cientan d b u rsty t rainsi z es.  The memory  coe fficient$M$ is defined as thePearso n c orr elat i on  c oef fi c ien t  b etw e entwo cons ec ut ive I ETs, w h o se v alu e fo r a s equence of $n $ I ETs, i.e ., $\ {\tau _i\} _{ i=1,\ cdots, n}$,ca n be estimatedby [ @Goh2008B urs ti nes s]  $$M\ equiv\ fra c{1 }{n - 1 }\sum_{ i =1} ^{ n - 1 }\ frac{(\tau_i - \la ng l e \t au\rangl e_1)(\ t au _{ i +1} - \l an gle \tau \ r angle _2)} { \s igma_1 \ sigma_ 2 }, 
   \lab el {eq:me mo ry_ ori ginal } $$ w here $ \langle\ tau\r a ngle_1$ ($\lan g le\tau\rangle _ 2$ ) an d  $\s igm a_1$ ($\sig ma_2 $ ) ar e th e  a ver a ge an d the  s t an d ard deviation of th efirst(last ) $n-1$ IETs,  respectiv e l y . Positi ve $ M $i mplies that th e sma ll (large) IETs ten d tobe follo wed by sm a l l (large ) I ETs . N ega t i ve  $M$ impliest h e op po site te nde ncy, wh ile  $M =0$  is  f or the un correlat ed  I ET s.  In  many empirica lana ly ses , pos i tive $ M$ ha s be en  o b ser ved [@G o h2 0 0 8Bur st in ess;  @W an g2015 Temp o ral ; @Guo2 017Bounds ; @ B ottc he r2 017Temp oral].

\(v)An other noti on  fo r meas u r ing thecorrelations between IE T s is th e b ursty  tra ins [@Kar sai 2012Un ive r sal].A burs ty tr ai n i s defin e d  a s a  s et of cons e c uti ve ev en ts s uch tha t IETs between any two  consecutiveeve ntsi n  t heb ur s tytr a ina r e less than orequal to a  g i ve n time win d ow$\ Delta t $, whil e tho s e betwe en events  in diffe re nt b u r sty  trains ar e larger  than $\D e lta t $ .The n umb er ofev ent s inthe bu r sty  trai n is c al led
iness measure [@Kim2016Measuring]:_$$B_n \equiv_\frac{\sqrt{n+1}\sigma - \sqrt{n-1}\langle\tau\rangle}{(\sqrt{n+1}-2)\sigma +_\sqrt{n-1}\langle\tau\rangle},$$ which_can_have the_value_of $1$ ($0$)_in the extremely_bursty case (in the_Poisson process) for_any_$n$.

\(iv) The correlations between IETs have been characterized by several measures [@Karsai2018Bursty]. Among them, we_focus_on the_memory_coefficient_and bursty train sizes. The_memory coefficient $M$ is defined_as the_Pearson correlation coefficient between two consecutive IETs, whose_value_for a sequence_of $n$ IETs, i.e., $\{\tau_i\}_{i=1,\cdots,n}$, can be estimated by [@Goh2008Burstiness]_$$M \equiv\frac{1}{n - 1}\sum_{i=1}^{n-1}\frac{(\tau_i - \langle\tau\rangle_1)(\tau_{i+1}_- \langle\tau\rangle_2)}{\sigma_1 \sigma_2},
___ \label{eq:memory_original}$$ where $\langle\tau\rangle_1$_($\langle\tau\rangle_2$) and $\sigma_1$ ($\sigma_2$) are the_average and the standard deviation of_the first (last) $n-1$ IETs, respectively. Positive_$M$ implies that the small (large)_IETs tend to be followed_by small_(large) IETs. Negative $M$ implies_the opposite tendency,_while $M=0$_is for the_uncorrelated IETs. In many empirical analyses,_positive $M$ has_been observed [@Goh2008Burstiness; @Wang2015Temporal; @Guo2017Bounds; @Bottcher2017Temporal].

\(v) Another_notion_for measuring the_correlations_between_IETs is_the bursty trains [@Karsai2012Universal]._A_bursty train_is_defined as a set of consecutive_events_such that IETs between any two consecutive_events in the bursty_train_are less than or_equal to a given time_window $\Delta t$, while those between_events in_different bursty_trains are larger than $\Delta t$. The number of events in_the bursty train is called