 &  & $\nwarrow $ &  \\ 
$\mathcal{\mathbf{P}}^{c}$ &  & $\overset{\Phi }{\rightarrow }$ &  & $\mathcal{\mathbf{P}}$%
\end{tabular}$$ Considering $\mathcal{\mathbf{P}}^{c}$ and $\mathcal{\mathbf{P}} $ as base spaces, the map $\overline{\Phi 
}$ is induced by $\Phi $. Hence it is a bundle map. We need to check that it is equivariant, i.e., $$\overline{\Phi }\left( \widetilde{\overline{u}}\cdot \gamma \right) =
\overline{\Phi }(\widetilde{\overline{u}})\cdot \rho (\gamma )\text{ \ \ \ \
\ for all }\gamma \in \Gamma.$$ We write $\overline{\Phi }$ explicitly. A map that satisfies all the properties of the above diagram is $$\overline{\Phi }(x^{\prime };\widetilde{\overline{u}})=\Phi (x^{\prime };
\widetilde{u}),$$ where $$p(x^{\prime }) = x$$ and $\widetilde{\overline{u}}$ ,$\widetilde{u}$ are the same pinor frames. Since multiplication by $\gamma $ leaves the fiber invariant, it is trivially true that $\overline{\Phi }$ is an equivariant map since $\Phi $ is itself equivariant.  Next we define the difference class of two structures. $\widetilde{\mathcal{\mathbf{P}}}$ and $\widetilde{\mathcal{\mathbf{P}}}^{\prime }$ are two $\Gamma $-structures on $\mathcal{\mathbf{P}}$, where the group actions differ by an isomorphism $\Psi $. The [*difference class*]{} $\delta (\widetilde{\mathcal{\mathbf{P}}},\widetilde{\mathcal{\mathbf{P}}}^{\prime })$ is defined to be $$\delta _{ji}(x)=\gamma _{ji}(x)\Psi (\gamma _{ji}^{\prime -1}(x)),\text{ \ \
\ \ x}\in U_{ij} \:.$$ Similarly, we can define $\overline{\delta }$ for the respective double covers. The difference class $\delta (\widetilde{\mathcal{\mathbf{P}}},\widetilde{\mathcal{\mathbf{P}}}^{\prime })$ can be shown to be an element of H$
^{1}(\mathcal{\mathbf{B}},\mathbf{Z}_{2}).$ Similarly, $\overline{\delta }(\widetilde{\mathcal{\mathbf{P}}^{
&   & $ \nwarrow $ &   \\ 
 $ \mathcal{\mathbf{P}}^{c}$ &   & $ \overset{\Phi } { \rightarrow } $ &   & $ \mathcal{\mathbf{P}}$% 
 \end{tabular}$$ Considering $ \mathcal{\mathbf{P}}^{c}$ and $ \mathcal{\mathbf{P } } $ as base spaces, the map $ \overline{\Phi 
 } $   is induce by $ \Phi $. therefore it is a bundle map. We necessitate to control that it is equivariant, i.e., $ $ \overline{\Phi } \left (\widetilde{\overline{u}}\cdot \gamma \right) = 
 \overline{\Phi } (\widetilde{\overline{u}})\cdot \rho (\gamma) \text { \ \ \ \ 
 \ for all } \gamma \in \Gamma.$$ We write $ \overline{\Phi } $   explicitly. A map that satisfy all the properties of the above diagram is $ $ \overline{\Phi } (x^{\prime }; \widetilde{\overline{u}})=\Phi (x^{\prime }; 
 \widetilde{u}),$$ where $ $ p(x^{\prime }) = x$$ and $ \widetilde{\overline{u}}$  , $ \widetilde{u}$ are the same pinor skeleton. Since multiplication by $ \gamma $ leaves the character invariant, it is trivially true that $ \overline{\Phi } $ is an equivariant function since $ \Phi $ is itself equivariant.   Next we define the difference class of two structures. $ \widetilde{\mathcal{\mathbf{P}}}$ and $ \widetilde{\mathcal{\mathbf{P}}}^{\prime } $   are two $ \Gamma $ -structures on $ \mathcal{\mathbf{P}}$, where the group actions differ by an isomorphism $ \Psi $. The [ * difference course * ] { } $ \delta (\widetilde{\mathcal{\mathbf{P}}},\widetilde{\mathcal{\mathbf{P}}}^{\prime }) $ is defined to be $ $ \delta _ { ji}(x)=\gamma _ { ji}(x)\Psi (\gamma _ { ji}^{\prime -1}(x)),\text { \ \ 
 \ \ x}\in U_{ij } \:.$$ Similarly, we can define $ \overline{\delta } $ for the respective double blanket.   The difference class $ \delta (\widetilde{\mathcal{\mathbf{P}}},\widetilde{\mathcal{\mathbf{P}}}^{\prime }) $ can be show to be an component of H$ 
 ^{1}(\mathcal{\mathbf{B}},\mathbf{Z}_{2}).$ Similarly, $ \overline{\delta } (\widetilde{\mathcal{\mathbf{P}}^ {
 &  & $\nwarrow $ &  \\ 
$\mathcal{\mathnf{P}}^{c}$ &  & $\overset{\Pku }{\righvarrow }$ &  & $\mathzal{\mathbf{P}}$%
\end{tabular}$$ Considecing $\mathxal{\mathbf{P}}^{c}$ and $\mathcau{\mathbf{P}} $ as base spares, the map $\overline{\Phi 
}$ lf insmced yy $\Phi $. Hence it is a bundne map. We need tu eheck that it is equivariant, i.e., $$\overjine{\Phi }\lfft( \widetilde{\oderlpnq{u}}\cdkn \namma \right) =
\overline{\Phi }(\widetilds{\overliie{u}})\cdot \rho (\gamka )\text{ \ \ \ \
\ for all }\gamma \ln \Gwmma.$$ We write $\overpine{\Phi }$ expoicieoy. A map thag satisfies all the prkperties of the above diagram ir $$\ovexline{\Phi }(x^{\ptnne };\ahdetilde{\ovecline{u}})=\Ihi (x^{\prime };
\widetilde{u}),$$ where $$l(x^{\prime }) = x$$ anc $\wmdetulde{\overline{u}}$ ,$\widetildx{u}$ are the same pinot frames. Shnee multiplication by $\tanma $ neavas tfw fkbed mnvzriant, it is triviamly true thqt $\overline{\Phi }$ is sn vauivariant mzp sinse $\Phi $ is itself equivariant.  Next we defpne fhe difference class of two structures. $\widetllde{\mathcwl{\mathbf{P}}}$ and $\widetilde{\mathcal{\mathbf{P}}}^{\prime }$ are twm $\Gamjx $-surmgturdw ln $\mathcal{\mathbf{P}}$, where the group actions difssr bj an isomorphism $\Isi $. The [*differencr flsfs*]{} $\delta (\widejilde{\macgczl{\mathbf{P}}},\widetilde{\lathcal{\iathbd{P}}}^{\prime })$ ys drfined to be $$\delta _{ji}(x)=\gamma _{ji}(x)\Psi (\gammc _{ju}^{\prime -1}(x)),\text{ \ \
\ \ x}\iu U_{ij} \:.$$ Similcrly, wg can cefine $\overline{\delta }$ fur tge respectige double zovers. The differdncv cldss $\delta (\widetilde{\mathcal{\iathbf{P}}},\wivetilbe{\mathcau{\matnbf{P}}}^{\pryme })$ can bf shown to be an element of H$
^{1}(\ladhcal{\mathbv{B}},\mathbf{Z}_{2}).$ Similarly, $\overline{\delve }(\widetilde{\majhcdl{\mdthbf{P}}^{
& & $\nwarrow $ & \\ $\mathcal{\mathbf{P}}^{c}$ $\overset{\Phi }$ & $\mathcal{\mathbf{P}}$% \end{tabular}$$ Considering base the map $\overline{\Phi is induced by $. Hence it is a bundle We need to check that it is equivariant, i.e., $$\overline{\Phi }\left( \widetilde{\overline{u}}\cdot \gamma = \overline{\Phi }(\widetilde{\overline{u}})\cdot \rho (\gamma )\text{ \ \ \ \ \ for all \in We $\overline{\Phi explicitly. A map that satisfies all the properties of the above diagram is $$\overline{\Phi }(x^{\prime };\widetilde{\overline{u}})=\Phi }; \widetilde{u}),$$ where $$p(x^{\prime }) = x$$ and ,$\widetilde{u}$ are the same frames. Since multiplication by $\gamma leaves fiber invariant, is true $\overline{\Phi }$ is equivariant map since $\Phi $ is itself equivariant. Next we define the difference class of two structures. and $\widetilde{\mathcal{\mathbf{P}}}^{\prime two $\Gamma on where group actions differ isomorphism $\Psi $. The [*difference class*]{} is defined to be $$\delta _{ji}(x)=\gamma _{ji}(x)\Psi (\gamma -1}(x)),\text{ \ \ \ x}\in U_{ij} \:.$$ Similarly, can define $\overline{\delta }$ for the respective double The difference class $\delta (\widetilde{\mathcal{\mathbf{P}}},\widetilde{\mathcal{\mathbf{P}}}^{\prime })$ can be shown to be an element of H$ $\overline{\delta }(\widetilde{\mathcal{\mathbf{P}}^{
 &  & $\nwarrow $ &  \\ 
$\mathcal{\mathbf{P}}^{c}$ &  & $\oveRset{\Phi }{\rigHtarrOw }$ &  & $\mAthCaL{\matHbf{P}}$%
\End{tabular}$$ ConsIDeriNg $\mathcal{\mathbf{P}}^{c}$ and $\maThcal{\MaTHbf{P}} $ AS bAse spAces, the MAp $\OVErlInE{\PHi 
}$ iS iNDuCed by $\phi $. hence it Is a bundle mAp. WE nEed to check thAT iT is equivarIanT, i.e., $$\overline{\PHi }\lEft( \widEtIldE{\OverlIne{U}}\cdot \Gamma \rIGht) =
\oveRline{\Phi }(\wIdETilde{\oVErline{u}})\CDOt \Rho (\gAmma )\text{ \ \ \ \
\ for all }\gamMA \iN \gamma.$$ We write $\ovErline{\phI }$ ExPLIciTly. a map that saTiSfies ALl the prOPeRTIEs oF The above diagrAm is $$\overlinE{\phi }(X^{\prime };\WiDetILde{\oveRline{U}})=\PHI (x^{\pRime };
\widetilDe{u}),$$ wHere $$p(x^{\priMe }) = x$$ and $\WIdetildE{\OverlinE{u}}$ ,$\wideTilDe{u}$ Are tHE sAmE piNoR FraMEs. sinCE muLtiplicaTiOn By $\gamMa $ leAVES The fIbeR invArianT, it is triviallY trUe thAT $\ovErlinE{\Phi }$ iS an eQuIvariAnt map Since $\phI $ is itself equivaRianT.  Next we deFinE tHe dIfFerenCE class Of tWo sTructurEs. $\widetILde{\MaTHCAl{\Mathbf{P}}}$ and $\widetildE{\mATHcAl{\mathbf{p}}}^{\prime }$ ARe TwO $\gamma $-strUcTurEs on $\MAThcal{\MathBF{P}}$, Where the Group aCTiOnS differ By An isomOrPhiSm $\PSi $. The [*DIffeRence cLass*]{} $\deltA (\wideTIlde{\mathcal{\matHBf{P}}},\widetilde{\mAThCAL{\mAThbf{p}}}^{\prIme })$ is defineD to bE $$\DeltA _{ji}(x)=\GAmMa _{jI}(X)\Psi (\gAmma _{jI}^{\pRImE -1}(X)),\text{ \ \
\ \ x}\in U_{ij} \:.$$ SimilarlY, wE can deFine $\oVerline{\delta }$ fOr the respeCTIVe double CoveRS. THE difference claSs $\delTa (\widetildE{\Mathcal{\mAthbf{p}}},\widetilDe{\mathcal{\MAThbf{P}}}^{\priMe })$ cAn bE shOwn TO Be An element of H$
^{1}(\mATHcal{\MaThbf{B}},\maThbF{Z}_{2}).$ SimilArlY, $\ovErlIne{\DeLta }(\widetiLde{\mathcAl{\MaThBf{p}}^{
 &  & $\nwarrow $ &  \\ 
$ \mathcal{\ mathb f{P }}^ {c }$ &   &$\overset{\Phi }{\r ightarrow }$ &  & $\ma thcal {\ m athb f {P }}$%\end{ta b ul a r }$$  C on sid er i ng  $\ma thc al{\mat hbf{P}}^{c }$an d $\mathcal{ \ ma thbf{P}} $  as  base spaces , t he map  $ \ov e rline {\P hi 
} $ is i n ducedby $\Phi$. Hencei t is ab u nd le m ap. We need to ch e ck that it is equ ivaria nt ,  i . e .,$$\ overline{\ Ph i }\l e ft( \wi d et i l d e{\ o verline{u}}\c dot \gamma\ rig ht) =\o ver l ine{\P hi }( \w i det ilde{\overl ine{ u}})\cdot  \rho( \gamma) \text{\ \ \\
\  fo r al l  } \g amm a\ in\ Ga mma . $$We write  $ \o verli ne{\ P h i }$ e xpl icit ly. A  map that sat isf iesa llthe p roper ties  o f the  above  diag ra m is $$\overlin e{\P hi }(x^{\ pri me  }; \w ideti l de{\ov erl ine {u}})=\ Phi (x^ { \pr im e } ;\widetilde{u}),$$wh e r e$$p(x^{\ prime} )=x $$ and $ \w ide tild e { \over line { u} }$ ,$\wi detild e {u }$  are th esame p in orfra mes.S ince  multi plicatio n by$ \gamma $ leave s  the fiber in v ar i a nt ,  itistrivially t ruet hat$\ov e rl ine { \Phi}$ is  a n  e q uivariant map since  $ \Phi $  is i tself equivar iant.  Nex t w e define  the di f ference classof tw o structur e s. $\wid etild e{\mathc al{\mathb f { P}}}$ an d $ \wi det ild e { \m athcal{\mathb f { P}}} ^{ \prime}$are two  $\ Gam ma$-s tr uctures o n $\math ca l{ \m at hbf {P}}$ ,  where t he  gr ou p a ction s  diffe r byan i so mo r phi sm $\Ps i  $ . The[* di ffer enc eclass *]{} $\d elta (\ widetilde {\m a thca l{ \m athbf{P }}},\widetild e{ \mathcal{\ ma thb f{P}}} ^ { \prime } )$ is defined to be $$\ d elta _{ ji} (x)=\ gamm a _{ji}(x )\P si (\g amm a  _{ji} ^{\pri me -1 }( x)) , \ text{ \  \ 
\\x}\in U_{i j }  \: .$$ S im ilar ly, wecan define $\overl i ne{ \delta }$ for  th e re s p ec tiv e  d o ubl ec ove r s . The differenc e class $\ de l ta  (\widetil d e{\ ma thcal{\ mathbf{ P}}}, \ widetil de{\mathc al{\mathb f{ P}}} ^ { \pr ime })$ ca n be sho wn to bea n ele m en t ofH$^{1}(\ ma thc al{\m athbf{ B }}, \math bf{Z}_ {2 }).$ S imila rl y, $\ove rline{\delta }(\widetil de{\ma thcal {\m athbf{P}} ^{
 &_ &_$\nwarrow $ & _\\ 
$\mathcal{\mathbf{P}}^{c}$_&_ &_$\overset{\Phi_}{\rightarrow }$ &_ & $\mathcal{\mathbf{P}}$%
\end{tabular}$$_Considering $\mathcal{\mathbf{P}}^{c}$ and $\mathcal{\mathbf{P}}_$ as base_spaces,_the map $\overline{\Phi 
}$ is induced by $\Phi $. Hence it is a bundle map._We_need to_check_that_it is equivariant, i.e., $$\overline{\Phi_}\left( \widetilde{\overline{u}}\cdot \gamma \right) =
\overline{\Phi_}(\widetilde{\overline{u}})\cdot \rho_(\gamma )\text{ \ \ \ \
\ for all_}\gamma_\in \Gamma.$$ We_write $\overline{\Phi }$ explicitly. A map that satisfies all the_properties of the above diagram is_$$\overline{\Phi }(x^{\prime };\widetilde{\overline{u}})=\Phi_(x^{\prime_};
\widetilde{u}),$$_where $$p(x^{\prime }) =_x$$ and $\widetilde{\overline{u}}$ ,$\widetilde{u}$ are the same_pinor frames. Since multiplication by $\gamma_$ leaves the fiber invariant, it is_trivially true that $\overline{\Phi }$ is_an equivariant map since $\Phi_$ is_itself equivariant.  Next we define_the difference class_of two_structures. $\widetilde{\mathcal{\mathbf{P}}}$ and_$\widetilde{\mathcal{\mathbf{P}}}^{\prime }$ are two $\Gamma $-structures on_$\mathcal{\mathbf{P}}$, where the_group actions differ by an isomorphism_$\Psi_$. The [*difference_class*]{}_$\delta_(\widetilde{\mathcal{\mathbf{P}}},\widetilde{\mathcal{\mathbf{P}}}^{\prime })$_is defined to_be_$$\delta _{ji}(x)=\gamma__{ji}(x)\Psi_(\gamma _{ji}^{\prime -1}(x)),\text{ \ \
\ \_x}\in_U_{ij} \:.$$ Similarly, we can define $\overline{\delta_}$ for the respective_double_covers. The difference class $\delta_(\widetilde{\mathcal{\mathbf{P}}},\widetilde{\mathcal{\mathbf{P}}}^{\prime })$ can be shown_to be an element of H$
^{1}(\mathcal{\mathbf{B}},\mathbf{Z}_{2}).$_Similarly, $\overline{\delta_}(\widetilde{\mathcal{\mathbf{P}}^{