651\ \textrm{ with the 95\% confidence interval } \ [ 0.0035873  ; 0.0083429]$$ Although this value seems to be small, the significance of $ \hat\beta$ has been shown by a likelihood ratio test. The test of $\beta=0$ against $\beta=\hat\beta$ returns a p-value of $7.02 \times 10^{-7}$. Thus, the solar activity index $X$ affects the number of storms occurring during a cycle. Graphically, the influence of the solar activity index on the number of storms per cycle is observable on Figure \[NbO\_AS\_111\].\

![Total number of storms per cycle for a low level of 111 according to the solar activity (centered)[]{data-label="NbO_AS_111"}](Fig5.jpg){width="8cm" height="6.5cm"}

Instantaneous intensity: extrapolation to level 400 and relative risk {#section : extrapol}
---------------------------------------------------------------------

The extrapolation to the storms of extreme level 400 is made by multiplying by $\widehat{P_{400}}$ (with confidence interval). We obtain the final intensity shown in Figure \[fig: intensite\_111\]. This curve corresponds to intensity of apparition of extreme storms for a solar cycle with a mean solar activity of 146.7. Recall that in the equation: $$\lambda_j(t) = \lambda_0(t) D_j \exp ( \beta X_j)$$ the risk factor is $\exp ( \beta X_j)$. Then, using $\hat\beta$, we can evaluate the relative risk for a cycle with a given solar activity index. For example compared to the average level of solar activity (146.7), a cycle with a high solar activity of 180 has a relative risk of $\exp(33.3 \times 0.0059651) = 1.22$.

![Instantaneous intensity (years$^{-1}$), with confidence interval, of the storms of level 400 obtained by extrapolation from the low level 111, for a mean solar activity of 146.7. In dash-dotted line the empirical frequency of storms of level 400[]{data-label="fig: intensite_111"}](Fig6.jpg){width="8cm" height="6.5cm"}

Method stability
----------------

The results presented in the previous sections are given for a fixed low level (of 111). This asks the question
651\ \textrm { with the 95\% confidence interval } \ [ 0.0035873  ; 0.0083429]$$ Although this value seems to be small, the meaning of $ \hat\beta$ has been usher by a likelihood ratio test. The trial of $ \beta=0 $ against $ \beta=\hat\beta$ return a p - value of $ 7.02 \times 10^{-7}$. Thus, the solar activeness exponent $ X$ affects the number of storms occurring during a cycle. diagrammatically, the influence of the solar activity index on the number of storms per hertz is observable on Figure \[NbO\_AS\_111\].\ 

! [ Total number of storms per cycle for a abject level of 111 according to the solar activity (centered)[]{data - label="NbO_AS_111"}](Fig5.jpg){width="8 curium " height="6.5 cm " } 

 Instantaneous intensity: extrapolation to level 400 and relative risk { # part: extrapol } 
 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 

 The extrapolation to the storms of extreme level 400 is made by multiplying by $ \widehat{P_{400}}$ (with confidence time interval). We obtain the final intensity shown in Figure \[fig: intensite\_111\ ]. This curve corresponds to volume of apparition of extreme storms for a solar cycle with a mean solar activity of 146.7. Recall that in the equation: $ $ \lambda_j(t) = \lambda_0(t) D_j \exp (\beta X_j)$$ the risk factor is $ \exp (\beta X_j)$. Then, using $ \hat\beta$, we can evaluate the proportional hazard for a cycle with a given solar activity exponent. For exercise compared to the average grade of solar natural process (146.7), a cycle with a high solar natural process of 180 has a relative risk of $ \exp(33.3 \times 0.0059651) = 1.22$. 

! [ Instantaneous intensity (years$^{-1}$), with confidence interval, of the storm of level 400 obtained by extrapolation from the low level 111, for a hateful solar action of 146.7. In dash - dotted line the empirical frequency of storms of floor 400[]{data - label="fig: intensite_111"}](Fig6.jpg){width="8 cm " height="6.5 cm " } 

 Method stability 
 ---------------- 

 The results presented in the previous sections are given for a fixed low horizontal surface (of 111). This asks the motion
651\ \tedtrm{ with the 95\% confidenct interval } \ [ 0.0035873  ; 0.0083429]$$ Althoujh this value sdems to be small, the signifirancw of $ \hat\beta$ has been showv by a linelihood ratmo test. The test of $\beta=0$ againab $\betc=\het\beta$ returns s p-value ox $7.02 \times 10^{-7}$. Thus, tfe solar activity index $X$ affects the number ov storms occurting ctrinf a cycle. Graphically, the influencs of tht solar activity imdex on the number of storls pfr cycle is observwble on Figode \[GvO\_AS\_111\].\

![Total nuober of storms per cycme for a low level of 111 accordine to che solar axtuvihi (centered)[]{dava-labej="NbO_AS_111"}](Fig5.jpg){width="8cm" veight="6.5ck"}

Instantaneous invensuty: extrapolation to nevel 400 and relativg risk {#secdikn : extrapol}
---------------------------------------------------------------------

The ezteapoldtiot to rhe stkrks of exhreje level 400 js made by nultiplying by $\widenae{I_{400}}$ (with confidsnce igtqrval). We obtain the final intensity shofn jn Figure \[fig: intensite\_111\]. This curve corresponfs to intqnsity of apparition of extreme storms for a solas cycmd wnbm a owaj solar activity of 146.7. Recall that in the equatykn: $$\lsmbda_j(t) = \lambdc_0(t) D_j \exp ( \beta C_j)$$ tng risk factor ks $\exp ( \bsta X_j)$. Then, using $\jat\beta$, we cqn evaluaue thr relative risk for a cycle with a giveu silar activity inder. For examplz compsred yo the average level of solzr activity (146.7), a cycle dith a high solaf abtivhty of 180 has a relative rish of $\exp(33.3 \vimes 0.0059651) = 1.22$.

![Instxntameous yntensity (jears$^{-1}$), with confidence inhervap, mf the stogms of level 400 obtained by extra'plation from tve now levej 111, fov a mean solar wctivity of 146.7. Iu dash-docted lkne the emiirical fcequency of ftorms of levap 400[]{data-label="fmg: intensyte_111"}](Fug6.jpt){width="8co" height="6.5cm"}

Methoc stabiliny
----------------

Uhe resultw presented in the prgvjous sections axt guven for a fixec luw jenel (os 111). This asks dhe dueryion
651\ \textrm{ with the 95\% confidence interval [ ; 0.0083429]$$ this value seems of \hat\beta$ has been by a likelihood test. The test of $\beta=0$ against returns a p-value of $7.02 \times 10^{-7}$. Thus, the solar activity index $X$ the number of storms occurring during a cycle. Graphically, the influence of the activity on number storms per cycle is observable on Figure \[NbO\_AS\_111\].\ ![Total number of storms per cycle for a level of 111 according to the solar activity height="6.5cm"} Instantaneous intensity: extrapolation level 400 and relative risk : --------------------------------------------------------------------- The to storms extreme level 400 made by multiplying by $\widehat{P_{400}}$ (with confidence interval). We obtain the final intensity shown in Figure \[fig: This curve intensity of of storms a solar cycle mean solar activity of 146.7. Recall equation: $$\lambda_j(t) = \lambda_0(t) D_j \exp ( \beta the risk is $\exp ( \beta X_j)$. Then, $\hat\beta$, we can evaluate the relative risk for cycle with a given solar activity index. For example compared to the average level of (146.7), a cycle with high solar activity 180 a risk $\exp(33.3 \times = 1.22$. ![Instantaneous intensity (years$^{-1}$), with confidence interval, of the storms level 400 obtained by extrapolation from the low level 111, mean activity of 146.7. dash-dotted line the empirical of of level 400[]{data-label="fig: intensite_111"}](Fig6.jpg){width="8cm" stability The the sections given for a fixed level (of 111). This asks question
651\ \textrm{ with the 95\% confidence inTerval } \ [ 0.0035873  ; 0.0083429]$$ AlthOugh tHis ValUe SeemS to bE small, the signiFIcanCe of $ \hat\beta$ has been showN by a lIkELihoOD rAtio tEst. The tESt OF $\BetA=0$ aGaInsT $\bETa=\Hat\beTa$ rEturns a P-value of $7.02 \tiMes 10^{-7}$. thUs, the solar acTIvIty index $X$ aFfeCts the number Of sTorms oCcUrrINg durIng A cyclE. GraphICally, tHe influenCe OF the soLAr activITY iNdex On the number of storMS pER cycle is observAble on fiGUrE \[nBO\_As\_111\].\

![ToTal number oF sTorms PEr cycle FOr A LOW leVEl of 111 according To the solar aCTivIty (cenTeRed)[]{DAta-labEl="NbO_aS_111"}](fIg5.jPg){width="8cm" heIght="6.5Cm"}

InstantAneous INtensitY: ExtrapoLation To lEveL 400 and RElAtIve RiSK {#seCTiOn : eXTraPol}
---------------------------------------------------------------------

The exTrApOlatiOn to THE STormS of ExtrEme leVel 400 is made by muLtiPlyiNG by $\WidehAt{P_{400}}$ (wiTh coNfIdencE interVal). We ObTain the final intEnsiTy shown in figUrE \[fiG: iNtensITe\_111\]. This CurVe cOrrespoNds to inTEnsItY OF ApParition of extreme sToRMS fOr a solar Cycle wITh A mEAn solar aCtIviTy of 146.7. rECall tHat iN ThE equatioN: $$\lambdA_J(t) = \LaMbda_0(t) D_j \ExP ( \beta X_J)$$ tHe rIsk FactoR Is $\exP ( \beta X_J)$. Then, usiNg $\hat\BEta$, we can evaluaTE the relative rISk FOR a CYcle WitH a given solaR actIVity IndeX. foR exAMple cOmparEd TO tHE average level of solaR aCtivitY (146.7), a cycLe with a high soLar activitY OF 180 Has a relaTive RIsK Of $\exp(33.3 \times 0.0059651) = 1.22$.

![InstAntanEous intensITy (years$^{-1}$), wIth coNfidence Interval, oF THe storms Of lEveL 400 obTaiNED bY extrapolatioN FRom tHe Low leveL 111, foR a mean sOlaR acTivIty Of 146.7. in dash-dotTed line tHe EmPiRiCal FrequENcy of stoRmS of LeVel 400[]{Data-lABel="fig: IntenSite_111"}](fiG6.jPG){wiDth="8cm" heIGhT="6.5CM"}

MetHoD sTabiLitY
----------------

THe resUlts PResEnted in The previoUs sECtioNs ArE given fOr a fixed low leVeL (of 111). This askS tHe qUestioN
651\ \textrm{ with the 95\ % confiden ce in ter val  }  \ [  0.0 035873  ; 0.00 8 3429 ]$$ Although this valu e see ms to b e  s mall,  the si g ni f i can ce  o f $  \ h at \beta $ h as been  shown bya l ik elihood rati o  t est. The t est  of $\beta=0 $ a gainst  $ \be t a=\ha t\b eta$return s  a p-v alue of $ 7. 0 2 \tim e s 10^{- 7 } $.  Thu s, the solar acti v it y  index $X$ aff ects t he nu m b erofstorms occ ur ringd uring a cy c l e . G r aphically, th e influence ofthe so la r a c tivity  inde xo n t he number o f st orms percyclei s obser v able on  Figur e \ [Nb O\_A S \_ 11 1\] .\ 
![ T ot aln umb er of st or ms  percycl e f o r alow  lev el of  111 accordin g t o th e  so lar a ctivi ty ( ce ntere d)[]{d ata-l ab el="NbO_AS_111" }](F ig5.jpg){ wid th ="8 cm " hei g ht="6. 5cm "}
Instan taneous int en s i t y:  extrapolation tole v e l400 andrelati v eri s k {#sect io n :  ext r a pol}---- - -- -------- ------ - -- -- ------- -- ------ -- --- --- ----- - ---- ------ ----

Th e ext r apolation to t h e storms of e x tr e m el evel  40 0 is made b y mu l tipl ying by  $\ w ideha t{P_{ 40 0 }} $  (with confidence i nt erval) . Weobtain the fi nal intens i t y  shown i n Fi g ur e  \[fig: intens ite\_ 111\]. Thi s  curve c orres ponds to  intensit y of appar iti onofext r e me  storms for a s olar  c ycle wi tha meansol aract ivi ty  of 146.7 . Recall  t ha tin  th e equ a tion: $$ \l amb da _j( t) =\ lambda _0(t)  D_j  \ ex p  (\beta X _ j) $ $  the  r is k fa cto ris $\ exp(  \b eta X_j )$. Then,  us i ng $ \h at \beta$,  we can evalu at e the rela ti verisk f o r  a cycle  with a given solar act i vity in dex . For  exa mple comp are d to t hea verage  level  of s ol ara c tivit y (1 46. 7) , a cyclew i tha hig hsola r activ ity of 180 has a r e lat ive risk of $ \ex p(33 . 3  \ tim e s0 .00 59 6 51) =  1.22$.

![Inst antaneousin t en sity (year s $^{ -1 }$), wi th conf idenc e  interv al, of th e stormsof  lev e l  40 0 obtained  by extr apolation fromt he  lowlev el 111 ,for  a me an sol a r a ctivi ty of14 6.7. I n das h- dotted l ine the empirical frequ ency o f sto rms  of level  40 0 []{ data-labe l="f ig: intens ite _11 1"}]( Fig 6 .jpg) {wid t h= "8c m " hei ght= " 6.5cm"}
M et hod s ta bility
---- - - - --- ----- -
T he res ults  presented in the previous secti onsa r e g ive n  for  a  fixed low lev el(o f 111). Th is  asks the q uestion
651\ \textrm{_with the_95\% confidence interval }_\ [_0.0035873_ ;_0.0083429]$$_Although this value_seems to be_small, the significance of_$ \hat\beta$ has_been_shown by a likelihood ratio test. The test of $\beta=0$ against $\beta=\hat\beta$ returns a_p-value_of $7.02_\times_10^{-7}$._Thus, the solar activity index_$X$ affects the number of_storms occurring_during a cycle. Graphically, the influence of the_solar_activity index on_the number of storms per cycle is observable on_Figure \[NbO\_AS\_111\].\

![Total number of storms per_cycle for a_low_level_of 111 according to_the solar activity (centered)[]{data-label="NbO_AS_111"}](Fig5.jpg){width="8cm" height="6.5cm"}

Instantaneous intensity:_extrapolation to level 400 and relative_risk {#section : extrapol}
---------------------------------------------------------------------

The extrapolation to the_storms of extreme level 400 is_made by multiplying by $\widehat{P_{400}}$_(with confidence_interval). We obtain the final_intensity shown in_Figure \[fig:_intensite\_111\]. This curve_corresponds to intensity of apparition of_extreme storms for_a solar cycle with a mean_solar_activity of 146.7._Recall_that_in the_equation: $$\lambda_j(t) =_\lambda_0(t)_D_j \exp_(_\beta X_j)$$ the risk factor is_$\exp_( \beta X_j)$. Then, using $\hat\beta$, we_can evaluate the relative_risk_for a cycle with_a given solar activity index._For example compared to the average_level of_solar activity_(146.7), a cycle with a high solar activity of 180 has_a relative risk of $\exp(33.3 \times_0.0059651) = 1.22$.

![Instantaneous intensity_(years$^{-1}$), with_confidence_interval, of the_storms_of level_400 obtained by extrapolation from the low_level 111,_for a mean solar activity of_146.7. In dash-dotted line_the_empirical frequency of storms of level_400[]{data-label="fig: intensite_111"}](Fig6.jpg){width="8cm" height="6.5cm"}

Method stability
----------------

The results presented_in the previous sections are_given_for_a fixed low level (of_111). This asks the question