 partitions of $n$ with distinct parts, see [@jozef1989; @stemb1988; @stemb1989]. For any $\lambda\in \mathcal{D}(n)$, let $\langle\lambda\rangle$ denote the character of the irreducible projective or spin representation indexed by $\lambda$. Morris [@morri1965] has found a combinatorial rule for calculating the characters, which is the projective analogue of the Murnaghan-Nakayama rule. In terms of bar tableaux, Morris’s theorem reads as follows:

\[mnrule\] Let $\lambda\in \mathcal{D}(n)$ and $\pi\in
\mathcal{P}^o(n)$. Then $$\label{mnruleeq}
\langle\lambda\rangle(\pi)=\sum_{T}wt(T)$$ where the sum ranges over all bar tableaux of shape $\lambda$ and type $\pi$.

The above theorem for projective characters implies the following formula, which will be used later in the proof of Lemma \[len2\].

\[2odd\] Let $\lambda$ be a strict partition of length $2$. Suppose that the two parts $\lambda_1,\lambda_2$ are both odd. Then we have $$\langle\lambda\rangle(\lambda)=-1.$$

Let $T$ be the bar tableau obtained by filling the last $\lambda_2$ squares in the first row of $S(\lambda)$ with $2$’s and the remaining squares with $1$’s, and let $T'$ be the bar tableau obtained by filling the first row of $S(\lambda)$ with $1$’s and the second row with $2$’s. Clearly, $T$ and $T'$ are of the same type $\lambda$. Let us first consider the weight of $T$. If $\lambda_1-\lambda_2<\lambda_2$, then $$wt(T)=(-1)^{2-1} 2^{1-0}\cdot (-1)^{2-1+\lambda_2}2^{1-1}=-2.$$ If $\lambda_1-\lambda_2>\lambda_2$, then $$wt(T)=(-1)^{1-1} 2^{1-0}\cdot
(-1)^{2-1+\lambda_1-\lambda_2}2^{1-1}=-2.$$ In both cases, the weight of $T'$ equals $$wt(T')=(-1)^{2-2
partitions of $ n$ with distinct parts, see [ @jozef1989; @stemb1988; @stemb1989 ]. For any $ \lambda\in \mathcal{D}(n)$, lease $ \langle\lambda\rangle$ announce the character of the irreducible projective or spin theatrical performance indexed by $ \lambda$. Morris [ @morri1965 ] has discover a combinatorial principle for forecast the characters, which is the projective analogue of the Murnaghan - Nakayama convention. In terms of bar tableaux, Morris ’s theorem reads as keep up: 

 \[mnrule\ ] Let $ \lambda\in \mathcal{D}(n)$ and $ \pi\in 
 \mathcal{P}^o(n)$. Then $ $ \label{mnruleeq } 
 \langle\lambda\rangle(\pi)=\sum_{T}wt(T)$$ where the union range over all bar tableaux of shape $ \lambda$ and type $ \pi$. 

 The above theorem for projective characters implies the following formula, which will be use later in the proof of Lemma \[len2\ ]. 

 \[2odd\ ] Let $ \lambda$ be a rigid partition of length $ 2$. Suppose that the two parts $ \lambda_1,\lambda_2 $ are both curious. Then we have $ $ \langle\lambda\rangle(\lambda)=-1.$$ 

 Let $ T$ be the bar tableau obtained by filling the final $ \lambda_2 $ squares in the first row of $ S(\lambda)$ with $ 2 $ ’s and the remaining squares with $ 1 $ ’s, and let $ T'$ be the bar tableau obtained by filling the first row of $ S(\lambda)$ with $ 1 $ ’s and the second row with $ 2 $ ’s. Clearly, $ T$ and $ T'$ are of the same type $ \lambda$. Let us first see the weight of $ T$. If $ \lambda_1-\lambda_2<\lambda_2 $, then $ $ wt(T)=(-1)^{2 - 1 } 2^{1 - 0}\cdot (-1)^{2 - 1+\lambda_2}2^{1 - 1}=-2.$$ If $ \lambda_1-\lambda_2>\lambda_2 $, then $ $ wt(T)=(-1)^{1 - 1 } 2^{1 - 0}\cdot 
 (-1)^{2 - 1+\lambda_1-\lambda_2}2^{1 - 1}=-2.$$ In both cases, the weight unit of $ T'$ equal $ $ wt(T')=(-1)^{2 - 2
 pagtitions of $n$ with distikct parts, see [@joeed1989; @stemu1988; @stemb1989]. For any $\lambda\in \mathcal{D}(n)$, let $\langpe\oambdq\rangle$ denote the chafacter of the irrwducmble projective or spin vzpressktatimi indexed by $\lakbda$. Morriv [@morri1965] has fogna c combinatorial rule for calculating the chsrwcters, which if tht pwojedniye analogue of the Murnaghan-Nakagama rune. In terms og bar tableaux, Morris’s thelrem reads as follows:

\[mjrule\] Let $\lqmbdw\un \mathcal{D}(n)$ and $\pi\in
\mathcal{P}^o(n)$. Thgn $$\label{mnruleeq}
\langle\lambda\rangue(\pi)=\sbm_{T}wt(T)$$ wherg fhf sum ranges over all bar tableaux of shape $\kambda$ and typc $\pi$.

Tie avove theorem for projxctive characters imklies the xomlowing formula, wyixh winl ba usde lxted mn fhe prlof of Lemma \[men2\].

\[2odd\] Let $\oambda$ be a strict karepyion of lengfh $2$. Su[pjse that the two parts $\lambda_1,\lambda_2$ are bofh odd. Then we have $$\lantle\lambda\rangle(\lambda)=-1.$$

Pet $T$ be ehe bar tableau obtained by filling the last $\lambga_2$ sqnafes ik thd flrst row of $S(\lambda)$ with $2$’s and the remaining fsusrvs with $1$’s, and let $T'$ be the bsr tsfleau obtainea by fnmljng the first row lf $S(\lamfda)$ wuth $1$’s and the second row with $2$’s. Clearly, $R$ and $T'$ are jd the same type $\lalbda$. Let us firxt comsider the weight of $T$. Nf $\lamgda_1-\lambda_2<\lalbda_2$, then $$dt(T)=(-1)^{2-1} 2^{1-0}\cdot (-1)^{2-1+\lambda_2}2^{1-1}=-2.$$ Kf $\kakbda_1-\lambda_2>\lambda_2$, then $$wt(T)=(-1)^{1-1} 2^{1-0}\sdot
(-1)^{2-1+\lambde_1-\lambba_2}2^{1-1}=-2.$$ In bogh csses, tre weight lf $T'$ cxuals $$wt(T')=(-1)^{2-2
partitions of $n$ with distinct parts, see @stemb1989]. any $\lambda\in let $\langle\lambda\rangle$ denote projective spin representation indexed $\lambda$. Morris [@morri1965] found a combinatorial rule for calculating characters, which is the projective analogue of the Murnaghan-Nakayama rule. In terms of tableaux, Morris’s theorem reads as follows: \[mnrule\] Let $\lambda\in \mathcal{D}(n)$ and $\pi\in \mathcal{P}^o(n)$. $$\label{mnruleeq} where sum over all bar tableaux of shape $\lambda$ and type $\pi$. The above theorem for projective characters the following formula, which will be used later the proof of Lemma \[2odd\] Let $\lambda$ be a partition length $2$. that two $\lambda_1,\lambda_2$ are both Then we have $$\langle\lambda\rangle(\lambda)=-1.$$ Let $T$ be the bar tableau obtained by filling the last $\lambda_2$ squares the first $S(\lambda)$ with and remaining with $1$’s, and be the bar tableau obtained by row of $S(\lambda)$ with $1$’s and the second with $2$’s. $T$ and $T'$ are of the type $\lambda$. Let us first consider the weight $T$. If $\lambda_1-\lambda_2<\lambda_2$, then $$wt(T)=(-1)^{2-1} 2^{1-0}\cdot (-1)^{2-1+\lambda_2}2^{1-1}=-2.$$ If $\lambda_1-\lambda_2>\lambda_2$, then $$wt(T)=(-1)^{1-1} 2^{1-0}\cdot (-1)^{2-1+\lambda_1-\lambda_2}2^{1-1}=-2.$$ In both weight of $T'$ equals
 partitions of $n$ with distinct Parts, see [@joZef1989; @stEmb1988; @SteMb1989]. for aNy $\laMbda\in \mathcal{D}(N)$, Let $\lAngle\lambda\rangle$ denotE the cHaRActeR Of The irReducibLE pROJecTiVe Or sPiN RePreseNtaTion indExed by $\lambDa$. MOrRis [@morri1965] has fOUnD a combinatOriAl rule for calCulAting tHe ChaRActerS, whIch is The proJEctive Analogue oF tHE MurnaGHan-NakaYAMa Rule. in terms of bar tableAUx, mOrris’s theorem rEads as FoLLoWS:

\[MnrUle\] let $\lambda\iN \mAthcaL{d}(n)$ and $\pi\IN
\mATHCal{p}^O(n)$. Then $$\label{mnRuleeq}
\langlE\LamBda\ranGlE(\pi)=\SUm_{T}wt(T)$$ Where ThE Sum Ranges over aLl baR tableaux Of shapE $\Lambda$ aND type $\pi$.

the aboVe tHeoRem fOR pRoJecTiVE chARaCteRS imPlies the FoLlOwing FormULA, WHich WilL be uSed laTer in the proof Of LEmma \[LEn2\].

\[2oDd\] Let $\LambdA$ be a StRict pArtitiOn of lEnGth $2$. Suppose that tHe twO parts $\lamBda_1,\LaMbdA_2$ aRe botH Odd. TheN we HavE $$\langle\Lambda\rANglE(\lAMBDa)=-1.$$

let $T$ be the bar tableaU oBTAiNed by filLing thE LaSt $\LAmbda_2$ squArEs iN the FIRst roW of $S(\LAmBda)$ with $2$’s And the REmAiNing squArEs with $1$’S, aNd lEt $T'$ Be the BAr taBleau oBtained bY fillINg the first row oF $s(\lambda)$ with $1$’s aND tHE SeCOnd rOw wIth $2$’s. Clearly, $t$ and $t'$ Are oF the SAmE tyPE $\lambDa$. Let Us FIrST consider the weight oF $T$. if $\lambDa_1-\lamBda_2<\lambda_2$, then $$Wt(T)=(-1)^{2-1} 2^{1-0}\cdot (-1)^{2-1+\lamBDA_2}2^{1-1}=-2.$$ if $\lambda_1-\LambDA_2>\lAMbda_2$, then $$wt(T)=(-1)^{1-1} 2^{1-0}\cdoT
(-1)^{2-1+\lambDa_1-\lambda_2}2^{1-1}=-2.$$ In BOth cases, The weIght of $T'$ eQuals $$wt(T')=(-1)^{2-2
 partitions of $n$ with di stinct par ts, s ee[@j oz ef19 89;@stemb1988; @s t emb1 989]. For any $\lambda \in \ ma t hcal { D} (n)$,  let $\ l an g l e\l am bd a\r an g le $ den ote  the ch aracter of  th eirreduciblep ro jective or  sp in represent ati on ind ex edb y $\l amb da$.Morris [@morr i1965] ha sf ound a combina t o ri al r ule for calculati n gt he characters,  which  i s  t h e  pr oje ctive anal og ue of the Mur n ag h a n -Na k ayama rule. I n terms ofb artablea ux , M o rris’s  theo re m  re ads as foll ows: 

\[mnrul e\] Le t  $\lamb d a\in \m athcal {D} (n) $ an d  $ \p i\i n\ mat h ca l{P } ^o( n)$. The n$$ \labe l{mn r u l e eq}\la ngle \lamb da\rangle(\pi )=\ sum_ { T}w t(T)$ $ whe re t he  sumranges  over  a ll bar tableaux  ofshape $\l amb da $ a nd  type $\pi$. 

T heabove t heoremf orpr o j e ct ive characters imp li e s  t he follo wing f o rm ul a , whichwi llbe u s e d lat er i n  t he proof  of Le m ma  \ [len2\] .
\[2od d\ ] L et$\lam b da$be a s trict pa rtiti o n of length $2 $ . Suppose tha t  t h e  t w o pa rts  $\lambda_1 ,\la m bda_ 2$ a r ebot h  odd.  Then  w e  h a ve $$\langle\lambda \r angle( \lamb da)=-1.$$

Le t $T$ be t h e bar tabl eauo bt a ined by fillin g the  last $\la m bda_2$ s quare s in the  first ro w of $S(\l amb da) $ w ith $ 2$ ’s and the re m a inin gsquares  wi th $1$’ s,and  le t $ T' $ be thebar tabl ea uob ta ine d byf illing t he  fi rs t r ow of $S(\la mbda) $ wi th  $ 1 $’s  and th e  s e c ondro wwith  $2 $’ s. Cl earl y , $ T$ and$T'$ areoft he s am etype $\ lambda$. Letus  first con si der  the w e i ght of $ T$. If $\lambda_1-\lamb d a_2<\la mbd a_2$,  the n $$wt(T) =(- 1)^{2- 1}2 ^{1-0} \cdot(-1)^ {2 -1+ \ l ambda _ 2 }2 ^{1 -1 }=-2.$$ If $ \la mbda_ 1- \lam bda_2>\ lambda_2$, then $$ w t(T )=(-1)^{1-1}2^{ 1-0} \ c do t
( - 1) ^ {2- 1+ \ lam b d a_1-\lambda_2}2 ^{1-1}=-2. $$ In  both case s , t he  weight  of $T' $ equ a ls $$wt (T')=(-1) ^{2-2
 partitions_of $n$_with distinct parts, see_[@jozef1989; @stemb1988;_@stemb1989]._For any_$\lambda\in_\mathcal{D}(n)$, let $\langle\lambda\rangle$_denote the character_of the irreducible projective_or spin representation_indexed_by $\lambda$. Morris [@morri1965] has found a combinatorial rule for calculating the characters, which_is_the projective_analogue_of_the Murnaghan-Nakayama rule. In terms_of bar tableaux, Morris’s theorem_reads as_follows:

\[mnrule\] Let $\lambda\in \mathcal{D}(n)$ and $\pi\in
\mathcal{P}^o(n)$. Then $$\label{mnruleeq}
\langle\lambda\rangle(\pi)=\sum_{T}wt(T)$$_where_the sum ranges_over all bar tableaux of shape $\lambda$ and type_$\pi$.

The above theorem for projective characters_implies the following_formula,_which_will be used later_in the proof of Lemma \[len2\].

\[2odd\]_Let $\lambda$ be a strict partition_of length $2$. Suppose that the two_parts $\lambda_1,\lambda_2$ are both odd. Then_we have $$\langle\lambda\rangle(\lambda)=-1.$$

Let $T$ be_the bar_tableau obtained by filling the_last $\lambda_2$ squares_in the_first row of_$S(\lambda)$ with $2$’s and the remaining_squares with $1$’s,_and let $T'$ be the bar_tableau_obtained by filling_the_first_row of_$S(\lambda)$ with $1$’s_and_the second_row_with $2$’s. Clearly, $T$ and $T'$_are_of the same type $\lambda$. Let us_first consider the weight_of_$T$. If $\lambda_1-\lambda_2<\lambda_2$, then_$$wt(T)=(-1)^{2-1} 2^{1-0}\cdot (-1)^{2-1+\lambda_2}2^{1-1}=-2.$$ If $\lambda_1-\lambda_2>\lambda_2$,_then $$wt(T)=(-1)^{1-1} 2^{1-0}\cdot
(-1)^{2-1+\lambda_1-\lambda_2}2^{1-1}=-2.$$ In both cases,_the weight_of $T'$_equals $$wt(T')=(-1)^{2-2