 to $N_{2}/K$.

We will focus on the first term of. Hölder inequality gives $$\label{baseindcution}
\int |Ef_{s_1}Ef_{s_{1}'}Ef_{s_{2}}Ef_{s_{2}'}|w_{B_{N_{1}^{2}}}\leq \prod_{j=1}^{2}\left(\int  |Ef_{s_{j}}Ef_{s_{j}'}|^2w_{B_{N_{1}^{2}}}\right)^{1/2}.$$ Estimate is the start point of the analysis in the following Subsections.

We summarize in the lemma below how and come together to highlight the relevance of $A(N_{1}, N_{2}, \lambda)$ in the induction procedure.

\[finalinductionlemma\] When $\lambda \leq N_{1}/N_{2}$ and $\lambda \leq N_{1}$, we have $$\label{fikey}
K(N_{1}, N_{2}, \lambda)\lesssim K^{C}\frac{1}{\lambda}A(N_{1}, N_{2},\lambda)+K(N_{1}, N_{2}/K, \lambda)$$

Note that the assumption of Lemma \[finalinductionlemma\] always holds during the induction procedure to prove Lemma \[criticallll\].

Applying Lemma \[tansferlemma\], we have $$\label{ssd2}
\begin{aligned}
& \|Ef_{s_j} Ef_{s'_j}\|_{L^2_{avg}(w_{B_{N_{1}^{2}}})}\\
  \lesssim 
 &K^{C}A(N_{1}, N_{2}, \lambda)\left(\sum_{|\theta|=\frac{1}{\lambda N_1}}\|Ef_{s_j,\theta}\|_{L^4_{avg}(w_{B_{N_{1}^{2}}})}^2\right)^{1/2}\left(\sum_{|\theta|=\frac{1}{\lambda N_1}}\|Ef_{s'_j,\theta}\|_{L^4_{avg}(w_{B_{N_{1}^{2}}})}^2\right)^{1/2}.
 \end{aligned}$$

Plugging into, and then plugging into, we derive $$\label{finalinduce2}
 \
to $ N_{2}/K$. 

 We will focus on the first term of. Hölder inequality gives $ $ \label{baseindcution } 
 \int |Ef_{s_1}Ef_{s_{1}'}Ef_{s_{2}}Ef_{s_{2}'}|w_{B_{N_{1}^{2}}}\leq \prod_{j=1}^{2}\left(\int   |Ef_{s_{j}}Ef_{s_{j}'}|^2w_{B_{N_{1}^{2}}}\right)^{1/2}.$$ Estimate is the beginning item of the analysis in the following Subsections. 

 We summarize in the lemma below how and issue forth together to highlight the relevance of $ A(N_{1 }, N_{2 }, \lambda)$ in the trigger routine. 

 \[finalinductionlemma\ ] When $ \lambda \leq N_{1}/N_{2}$ and $ \lambda \leq N_{1}$, we have $ $ \label{fikey } 
 K(N_{1 }, N_{2 }, \lambda)\lesssim K^{C}\frac{1}{\lambda}A(N_{1 }, N_{2},\lambda)+K(N_{1 }, N_{2}/K, \lambda)$$ 

 notice that the premise of Lemma \[finalinductionlemma\ ] always hold during the induction procedure to test Lemma \[criticallll\ ]. 

 practice Lemma \[tansferlemma\ ], we have $ $ \label{ssd2 } 
 \begin{aligned } 
 & \|Ef_{s_j } Ef_{s'_j}\|_{L^2_{avg}(w_{B_{N_{1}^{2}}})}\\ 
   \lesssim 
  & K^{C}A(N_{1 }, N_{2 }, \lambda)\left(\sum_{|\theta|=\frac{1}{\lambda N_1}}\|Ef_{s_j,\theta}\|_{L^4_{avg}(w_{B_{N_{1}^{2}}})}^2\right)^{1/2}\left(\sum_{|\theta|=\frac{1}{\lambda N_1}}\|Ef_{s'_j,\theta}\|_{L^4_{avg}(w_{B_{N_{1}^{2}}})}^2\right)^{1/2 }. 
  \end{aligned}$$ 

 Plugging into, and then plugging into, we derive $ $ \label{finalinduce2 } 
  \
 to $N_{2}/K$.

We will focus on the nirst term of. Hölbwr inexualitg gives $$\uabel{baseindcution}
\int |Ef_{s_1}Ef_{s_{1}'}Xf_{s_{2}}Ed_{s_{2}'}|w_{B_{N_{1}^{2}}}\oeq \prod_{j=1}^{2}\left(\int  |Ef_{s_{j}}Df_{s_{j}'}|^2w_{B_{N_{1}^{2}}}\rihht)^{1/2}.$$ Estinate us the stacf point of ths ananbsis in the folkowing Subvections.

We sumkafive in the lemma below how and come tjgether tl highlight thg reltvagce kf $A(N_{1}, N_{2}, \lambda)$ in the induction prkcedure.

\[hinalinductionlrmma\] When $\lambda \leq N_{1}/N_{2}$ anf $\lalbda \leq N_{1}$, we have $$\label{fikey}
J(N_{1}, N_{2}, \oambda)\lesssio K^{C}\frac{1}{\lambda}A(N_{1}, N_{2},\lambsa)+K(N_{1}, N_{2}/K, \lambda)$$

Note that the assjmptipn of Lemmq \[dinwninductionlxmma\] ajways holds during tve induvtion procedurc to 'rovw Lemma \[criticallll\].

Ap'lying Lemma \[tansferjemma\], we vare $$\label{ssd2}
\begin{alignwd}
& \|Ef_{s_j} Ef_{s'_b}\|_{L^2_{ave}(q_{B_{N_{1}^{2}}})}\\
  \ltssxij 
 &K^{C}A(J_{1}, N_{2}, \lambda)\leff(\sum_{|\theta|=\frqc{1}{\lambda N_1}}\|Ef_{s_j,\theta}\|_{K^4_{adt}(w_{B_{N_{1}^{2}}})}^2\right)^{1/2}\left(\aum_{|\theea|=\srac{1}{\lambda N_1}}\|Ef_{s'_j,\theta}\|_{L^4_{avg}(w_{B_{N_{1}^{2}}})}^2\right)^{1/2}.
 \end{alpgnes}$$

Plugging into, and then plugging into, we derlve $$\label{sinalinduce2}
 \
to $N_{2}/K$. We will focus on the of. inequality gives \int |Ef_{s_1}Ef_{s_{1}'}Ef_{s_{2}}Ef_{s_{2}'}|w_{B_{N_{1}^{2}}}\leq \prod_{j=1}^{2}\left(\int point the analysis in following Subsections. We in the lemma below how and together to highlight the relevance of $A(N_{1}, N_{2}, \lambda)$ in the induction procedure. When $\lambda \leq N_{1}/N_{2}$ and $\lambda \leq N_{1}$, we have $$\label{fikey} K(N_{1}, N_{2}, K^{C}\frac{1}{\lambda}A(N_{1}, N_{2}/K, Note the assumption of Lemma \[finalinductionlemma\] always holds during the induction procedure to prove Lemma \[criticallll\]. Applying \[tansferlemma\], we have $$\label{ssd2} \begin{aligned} & \|Ef_{s_j} Ef_{s'_j}\|_{L^2_{avg}(w_{B_{N_{1}^{2}}})}\\ &K^{C}A(N_{1}, N_{2}, \lambda)\left(\sum_{|\theta|=\frac{1}{\lambda N_1}}\|Ef_{s_j,\theta}\|_{L^4_{avg}(w_{B_{N_{1}^{2}}})}^2\right)^{1/2}\left(\sum_{|\theta|=\frac{1}{\lambda \end{aligned}$$ Plugging into, and then into, derive $$\label{finalinduce2}
 to $N_{2}/K$.

We will focus on the first Term of. HöldEr ineQuaLitY gIves $$\LabeL{baseindcution}
\INt |Ef_{S_1}Ef_{s_{1}'}Ef_{s_{2}}Ef_{s_{2}'}|w_{B_{N_{1}^{2}}}\leq \prod_{j=1}^{2}\lEft(\inT  |EF_{S_{j}}Ef_{S_{J}'}|^2w_{b_{N_{1}^{2}}}\rigHt)^{1/2}.$$ EstimATe IS The StArT poInT Of The anAlySis in thE following subSeCtions.

We summARiZe in the lemMa bElow how and coMe tOgetheR tO hiGHlighT thE releVance oF $a(N_{1}, N_{2}, \lamBda)$ in the iNdUCtion pROcedure.

\[FINaLindUctionlemma\] When $\laMBdA \Leq N_{1}/N_{2}$ and $\lambda \Leq N_{1}$, we HaVE $$\lABEl{fIkeY}
K(N_{1}, N_{2}, \lambda)\LeSssim k^{c}\frac{1}{\laMBdA}a(n_{1}, n_{2},\laMBda)+K(N_{1}, N_{2}/K, \lambda)$$

note that the ASsuMption Of lemMA \[finalInducTiONleMma\] always hoLds dUring the iNductiON procedURe to proVe LemmA \[crItiCallLL\].

APpLyiNg lEmmA \[TaNsfERleMma\], we havE $$\lAbEl{ssd2}
\BegiN{ALIGned}
& \|ef_{s_J} Ef_{s'_J}\|_{L^2_{avg}(W_{B_{N_{1}^{2}}})}\\
  \lesssim 
 &K^{C}A(n_{1}, N_{2}, \lAmbdA)\LefT(\sum_{|\tHeta|=\fRac{1}{\lAmBda N_1}}\|EF_{s_j,\theTa}\|_{L^4_{avG}(w_{b_{N_{1}^{2}}})}^2\right)^{1/2}\left(\sum_{|\tHeta|=\Frac{1}{\lambdA N_1}}\|EF_{s'_J,\thEtA}\|_{L^4_{avg}(W_{b_{N_{1}^{2}}})}^2\righT)^{1/2}.
 \enD{alIgned}$$

PlUgging iNTo, aNd THEN pLugging into, we derivE $$\lABEl{FinalindUce2}
 \
 to $N_{2}/K$.

We will fo cus on the  firs t t erm  o f. H ölde r inequality g i ves$$\label{baseindcution }
\in t| Ef_{ s _1 }Ef_{ s_{1}'} E f_ { s _{2 }} Ef _{s _{ 2 }' }|w_{ B_{ N_{1}^{ 2}}}\leq \ pro d_ {j=1}^{2}\le f t( \int  |Ef_ {s_ {j}}Ef_{s_{j }'} |^2w_{ B_ {N_ { 1}^{2 }}} \righ t)^{1/ 2 }.$$ E stimate i st he sta r t point o ftheanalysis in the f o ll o wing Subsectio ns.

W es um m a riz e i n the lemm abelow how and co m e tog e ther to highl ight the re l eva nce of  $ A(N _ {1}, N _{2},  \ l amb da)$ in the  ind uction pr ocedur e .

\[fi n alinduc tionle mma \]When $\ la mbd a\ leq N_ {1} / N_{ 2}$ and$\ la mbda\leq N _ { 1}$,  we  hav e $$\ label{fikey}K(N _{1} ,  N_ {2},\lamb da)\ le sssim  K^{C} \frac {1 }{\lambda}A(N_{ 1},N_{2},\la mbd a) +K( N_ {1},N _{2}/K , \ lam bda)$$
Note t h atth e a ss umption of Lemma \ [f i n al inductio nlemma \ ]al w ays hold sdur ingt h e ind ucti o nprocedur e to p r ov eLemma \ [c ritica ll ll\ ].
Appl y ingLemma\[tansfe rlemm a \], we have $$ \ label{ssd2}
\ b eg i n {a l igne d}& \|Ef_{s_j } Ef _ {s'_ j}\| _ {L ^2_ { avg}( w_{B_ {N _ {1 } ^{2}}})}\\
  \lesss im  
 &K^ {C}A( N_{1}, N_{2},  \lambda)\ l e f t(\sum_{ |\th e ta | =\frac{1}{\lam bda N _1}}\|Ef_{ s _j,\thet a}\|_ {L^4_{av g}(w_{B_{ N _ {1}^{2}} })} ^2\ rig ht) ^ { 1/ 2}\left(\sum_ { | \the ta |=\frac {1} {\lambd a N _1} }\| Ef_ {s '_j,\thet a}\|_{L^ 4_ {a vg }( w_{ B_{N_ { 1}^{2}}} )} ^2\ ri ght )^{1/ 2 }.
 \e nd{al igne d} $$ 
Pl uggingi nt o ,  and  t he n pl ugg in g int o, w e  de rive $$ \label{fi nal i nduc e2 } \
 to_$N_{2}/K$.

We will_focus on the first_term of._Hölder_inequality gives_$$\label{baseindcution}
\int_|Ef_{s_1}Ef_{s_{1}'}Ef_{s_{2}}Ef_{s_{2}'}|w_{B_{N_{1}^{2}}}\leq \prod_{j=1}^{2}\left(\int _|Ef_{s_{j}}Ef_{s_{j}'}|^2w_{B_{N_{1}^{2}}}\right)^{1/2}.$$ Estimate is_the start point of_the analysis in_the_following Subsections.

We summarize in the lemma below how and come together to highlight the_relevance_of $A(N_{1},_N_{2},_\lambda)$_in the induction procedure.

\[finalinductionlemma\] When_$\lambda \leq N_{1}/N_{2}$ and $\lambda_\leq N_{1}$,_we have $$\label{fikey}
K(N_{1}, N_{2}, \lambda)\lesssim K^{C}\frac{1}{\lambda}A(N_{1}, N_{2},\lambda)+K(N_{1}, N_{2}/K,_\lambda)$$

Note_that the assumption_of Lemma \[finalinductionlemma\] always holds during the induction procedure_to prove Lemma \[criticallll\].

Applying Lemma \[tansferlemma\],_we have $$\label{ssd2}
\begin{aligned}
&_\|Ef_{s_j}_Ef_{s'_j}\|_{L^2_{avg}(w_{B_{N_{1}^{2}}})}\\
_ \lesssim 
 &K^{C}A(N_{1},_N_{2}, \lambda)\left(\sum_{|\theta|=\frac{1}{\lambda N_1}}\|Ef_{s_j,\theta}\|_{L^4_{avg}(w_{B_{N_{1}^{2}}})}^2\right)^{1/2}\left(\sum_{|\theta|=\frac{1}{\lambda N_1}}\|Ef_{s'_j,\theta}\|_{L^4_{avg}(w_{B_{N_{1}^{2}}})}^2\right)^{1/2}.
 \end{aligned}$$

Plugging into,_and then plugging into, we derive_$$\label{finalinduce2}
 \