 the occurrence of the second dredge-up during the Early-AGB of intermediate-mass stars, that causes a significant reduction of their core masses.

In Table \[tab\_mc1\] of Appendix \[app\_fit\] we present the fitting coefficients that we derive following the parametrization proposed by @WagenGroen_98, for several metallicities. In each panel of Fig. \[fig\_mc1\] the fitting curves are over-imposed to the `PARSEC` data for $M_{\rm c,1}$. We note, however, that our TP-AGB calculations use the true $M_{\rm c,1}$ values, and not those derived from the formulas.

TP-AGB evolution {#ssec_tpagbev}
----------------

For each stellar model with initial parameters $(M_{\rm i},Z_{\rm i})$ the characteristic quantities at the $1^{\rm st}$ thermal pulse (core mass, luminosity, effective temperature, envelope chemical composition), obtained from the [*PARSEC*]{} database, are fed as initial conditions to the `COLIBRI` code, which computes the TP-AGB evolution until when almost the entire envelope is lost by stellar winds. Operatively the `COLIBRI` calculations are stopped when the mass of the residual envelope falls below a limit of $0.002 M_{\odot} -0.005 M_{\odot}$. At this stage all evolutionary tracks are already evolving off the AGB towards higher effective temperatures, with a luminosity that depends mainly on the mass of the C-O core, and the phase of the pulse cycle at which the last event of mass ejection took place (see Fig \[fig\_hr\]).

For the present work we adopt a specific set of prescriptions for the mass loss and the third dredge-up, which we briefly outline below. These models will serve as a reference case for our ongoing TP-AGB calibration, and therefore the current parameters may be somewhat changed in future calculations. Anyhow, from various preliminary tests made with the present models, we expect that they already yield a fairly good description of the TP-AGB phase.

#### Mass loss. {#mass-loss..unnumbered}

It has been included under the hypothesis that it is driven by two main mechanisms, dominating at different stages. Initially, before radiation pressure on dust grains becomes the main agent of stellar winds, mass loss is described with the semi-empirical relation by
the occurrence of the second dredge - up during the Early - AGB of intermediate - mass stars, that cause a meaning reduction of their core batch. 

 In Table   \[tab\_mc1\ ] of Appendix   \[app\_fit\ ] we stage the fitting coefficients that we derive surveil the parametrization proposed by @WagenGroen_98, for several metallicities. In each jury of Fig.   \[fig\_mc1\ ] the fitting curves are over - levy to the 'PARSEC 'data for $ M_{\rm c,1}$. We note, however, that our TP - AGB calculation use the true $ M_{\rm c,1}$ values, and not those derived from the formulas. 

 TP - AGB development { # ssec_tpagbev } 
 ---------------- 

 For each stellar model with initial parameters $ (M_{\rm i},Z_{\rm i})$ the characteristic quantity at the $ 1^{\rm st}$ thermal pulse (core mass, luminosity, effective temperature, envelope chemical composition), obtain from the [ * PARSEC * ] { } database, are fed as initial weather to the 'COLIBRI 'code, which computes the TP - AGB evolution until when almost the entire envelope is lost by leading winds. Operatively the 'COLIBRI 'calculations are stopped when the mass of the residual envelope falls below a limit of $ 0.002 M_{\odot } -0.005 M_{\odot}$. At this stagecoach all evolutionary tracks are already evolving off the AGB towards higher effective temperatures, with a luminosity that depends mainly on the mass of the C - O core, and the phase of the pulse hertz at which the last event of bulk ejection took place (see Fig   \[fig\_hr\ ]). 

 For the present workplace we adopt a specific set of prescriptions for the mass personnel casualty and the third dredge - up, which we briefly outline below. These models will serve as a reference sheath for our ongoing TP - AGB calibration, and therefore the current parameters may be somewhat changed in future calculation. Anyhow, from various preliminary test made with the present models, we expect that they already yield a fairly effective description of the TP - AGB phase. 

 # # # # Mass loss. { # mass - personnel casualty.. unnumbered } 

 It has been included under the hypothesis that it is driven by two independent mechanisms, dominate at different phase. Initially, before radiation press on dust grain becomes the chief agent of stellar wind, mass passing is described with the semi - empirical relation by
 thf occurrence of the secokd dredge-up duriut the Xarly-AGG of intdrmediate-mass stars, that caudew a sugnificant reduction ow their clre massws.

In Rable \[tab\_mc1\] of Appekbix \[apl\_nit\] wz 'resent the fitjing coeffichents that we gefire following the parametrization pro[osed bu @AagenGroen_98, for sevtraj mefallicities. In each panel of Fig. \[fif\_mc1\] the fitting curvrs are over-imposed to the `OARSFC` data for $M_{\rm c,1}$. Ae note, howgber, rhat our TP-AEB calculauimns use thg true $M_{\rm c,1}$ values, and not thosd dernved from tye fogkulas.

TP-AGB xvolutpon {#ssec_tpagbcn}
----------------

For eawh stelkar model with inmtiao parameters $(M_{\rm i},Z_{\rm i})$ the characterisjic quantidizs at the $1^{\rm st}$ thermql pulsg (cora marw, ljmihoxify, efffctmve temperafure, envelope chemical composiuiog), obtained froj the [*[AWSEC*]{} database, are fed as initial conditpons to the `COLIBRI` code, whuch computes the TP-AGH evolutijn until when almost the entire envelope is lost ty stxluar wlnds. Ipfratively the `COLIBRI` calculations are stoppeq wnek the mass of thc residual envelopr vakjs below a lioit of $0.002 M_{\kdot} -0.005 M_{\odot}$. At thid stage all wvolutionwry yracks are already evolving off the AGB rowards higher effzctive tempexaturex, witn a luminosity that depznds mzinly on thf mass of ghe C-O core, and ghe pvase of ufe pulse cycle at which thx lasc event uf msss ejqction toon plaga (see Fig \[fig\_hr\]).

For hhe ptesent work we afopt a specific set of prescripvmons for the kavs noss and the bhird dredge-up, rhich we briefky outlnne beuow. These jodels xill serve af a reference fase for our ongoing TP-ATB cqlibratkun, and therefote the cugrtnt paramerers may be somewhet cfznged in future caoculations. Anyhpw, wroi narmous [seliminary tasts maar witf the presekt oodeks, we expect that thay amready yield a faitln good dewcriptiog of the TP-AGN phase.

#### Mass loss. {#lass-lmss..nnnumbrreq}

It has been included under ths hypothedis that it is qrivcn bi two main kechanisms, dominating at different stagxs. Initially, before raduation pressure on buxt grains bxcomes the main agent of stellar wibds, mass loss is cescribed with the seji-empisical relation by
the occurrence of the second dredge-up during of stars, that a significant reduction Table of Appendix \[app\_fit\] present the fitting that we derive following the parametrization by @WagenGroen_98, for several metallicities. In each panel of Fig. \[fig\_mc1\] the fitting are over-imposed to the `PARSEC` data for $M_{\rm c,1}$. We note, however, that TP-AGB use true c,1}$ values, and not those derived from the formulas. TP-AGB evolution {#ssec_tpagbev} ---------------- For each stellar with initial parameters $(M_{\rm i},Z_{\rm i})$ the characteristic at the $1^{\rm st}$ pulse (core mass, luminosity, effective envelope composition), obtained the database, fed as initial to the `COLIBRI` code, which computes the TP-AGB evolution until when almost the entire envelope is lost stellar winds. `COLIBRI` calculations stopped the of the residual below a limit of $0.002 M_{\odot} this stage all evolutionary tracks are already evolving the AGB higher effective temperatures, with a luminosity depends mainly on the mass of the C-O and the phase of the pulse cycle at which the last event of mass ejection (see Fig \[fig\_hr\]). For present work we a set prescriptions the mass and the third dredge-up, which we briefly outline below. These models serve as a reference case for our ongoing TP-AGB calibration, the parameters may be changed in future calculations. from preliminary tests made with models, expect yield fairly description of the TP-AGB #### Mass loss. {#mass-loss..unnumbered} It been included under the by two main mechanisms, dominating at different stages. before radiation pressure on dust grains becomes main agent of stellar winds, mass loss is described with the semi-empirical by
 the occurrence of the second dRedge-up durIng thE EaRly-aGb of iNterMediate-mass staRS, thaT causes a significant redUctioN oF TheiR CoRe masSes.

In TaBLe \[TAB\_mc1\] Of apPenDiX \[ApP\_fit\] wE prEsent thE fitting coEffIcIents that we dERiVe followinG thE parametrizaTioN propoSeD by @wAgenGRoeN_98, for sEveral MEtalliCities. In eAcH Panel oF fig. \[fig\_mC1\] THe FittIng curves are over-iMPoSEd to the `PARSEC` dAta for $m_{\rM C,1}$. WE NOte, HowEver, that ouR Tp-AGB cALculatiONs USE The TRue $M_{\rm c,1}$ values, And not those DEriVed froM tHe fORmulas.

tP-AGB EvOLutIon {#ssec_tpagBev}
----------------

FOr each steLlar moDEl with iNItial paRameteRs $(M_{\Rm i},z_{\rm i})$ THe ChAraCtERisTIc QuaNTitIes at the $1^{\Rm St}$ ThermAl puLSE (COre mAss, LumiNositY, effective temPerAturE, EnvElope ChemiCal cOmPositIon), obtAined FrOm the [*PARSEC*]{} dataBase, Are fed as iNitIaL coNdItionS To the `CoLIbRI` Code, whiCh compuTEs tHe tp-agB Evolution until when AlMOSt The entirE envelOPe Is LOst by steLlAr wInds. oPEratiVely THe `cOLIBRI` cAlculaTIoNs Are stopPeD when tHe MasS of The reSIduaL envelOpe falls Below A Limit of $0.002 M_{\odot} -0.005 M_{\oDOt}$. At this stage ALl EVOlUTionAry Tracks are alReadY EvolVing OFf The agB towArds hIgHEr EFfective temperatureS, wIth a luMinosIty that dependS mainly on tHE MAss of the c-O coRE, aND the phase of the Pulse Cycle at whiCH the last Event Of mass ejEction tooK PLace (see FIg \[fIg\_hR\]).

FoR thE PReSent work we adoPT A speCiFic set oF prEscriptIonS foR thE maSs Loss and thE third drEdGe-Up, WhIch We briEFly outliNe BelOw. theSe modELs will Serve As a rEfErENce Case for OUr ONGoinG Tp-AgB caLibRaTion, aNd thERefOre the cUrrent parAmeTErs mAy Be SomewhaT changed in futUrE calculatiOnS. AnYhow, frOM Various pReliminary tests made with THe preseNt mOdels, We exPect that tHey AlreadY yiELd a faiRly gooD descRiPtiON Of the tp-aGb phAsE.

#### Mass loss. {#mASS-loSs..unnUmBereD}

It has bEen included under thE HypOthesis that it Is dRiveN BY tWo mAIn MEchAnISms, DOMinating at diffeRent stages. inITiAlly, before RAdiAtIon presSure on dUst grAIns becoMes the maiN agent of sTeLlar WINds, Mass loss is DescribeD with the sEMi-empIRiCal reLatIon by
 the occurrence of the sec ond dredge -up d uri ngth e Ea rly- AGB of interme d iate -mass stars, that caus es asi g nifi c an t red uctiono ft h eir  c or e m as s es .

In  Ta ble \[t ab\_mc1\]ofAp pendix \[app \ _f it\] we pr ese nt the fitti ngcoeffi ci ent s  that  we  deri ve fol l owingthe param et r izatio n  propos e d  b y @W agenGroen_98, for se v eral metallici ties.In ea c h  pa nel  of Fig. \ [f ig\_m c 1\] the fi t t i ngc urves are ove r-imposed t o  th e `PAR SE C`d ata fo r $M_ {\ r m c ,1}$. We no te,however,that o u r TP-AG B  calcul ations  us e t he t r ue  $ M_{ \r m  c, 1 }$  va l ues , and no tth ose d eriv e d f romthe  for mulas .

TP-AGB evo lut ion{ #ss ec_tp agbev }
-- -- ----- ------ -

Fo reach stellar mo delwith init ial  p ara me ters$ (M_{\r m i },Z _{\rm i })$ the cha ra c t e ri stic quantities at  t h e  $ 1^{\rm s t}$ th e rm al pulse (c or e m ass, l umino sity ,  e ffective  tempe r at ur e, enve lo pe che mi cal  co mposi t ion) , obta ined fro m the [*PARSEC*]{} d a tabase, are f e da s  i n itia l c onditions t o th e  `CO LIBR I `cod e , whi ch co mp u te s  the TP-AGB evoluti on  until  when  almost the e ntire enve l o p e is los t by st e llar winds. Op erati vely the ` C OLIBRI`calcu lationsare stopp e d  when th e m ass  of  th e re sidual envelo p e  fal ls  belowa l imit of  $0 .00 2 M _{\ od ot} -0.00 5 M_{\od ot }$ .At  th is st a ge all e vo lut io nar y tra c ks are  alre adyev ol v ing  off th e  A G B  tow ar ds  hig her  e ffect ivet emp erature s, with a  lu m inos it ythat de pends mainlyon  the massof  th e C-Oc o re, andthe phase of the pulsec ycle at  wh ich t he l ast event  of  masseje c tion t ook pl ace ( se e F i g  \[fi g \ _h r\] ). 

For thep r ese nt wo rk  weadopt a  specific set of p r esc riptions forthe  mas s lo ssa nd the  t h ird d redge-up, which  we briefl yo ut line below .  Th es e model s willserve as a re ference c ase for o ur  ong o i ngTP-AGB cal ibration , and the r efore th e cur ren t para me ter s may  be so m ewh at ch angedin  futur e cal cu lations.  Anyhow, from various p relimi narytes ts made w ith the  presentmode ls, we exp ect  th at th eya lread y yi e ld  af airly  goo d  descript i on  of t he  TP-AGB pha s e . 

# ### M ass loss.{#ma ss-loss..unnumber e d}

It has bee n in c l ude d u n derth e hypothesis t hat  i t is drive nby two main  mechani sm s , dom inatin g at d ifferen t st a ges. I niti all y, before  ra di a tion pr es su r e on d ustgr ains b ecomes them a in agent of stel lar w i n ds, m a sslossis  descri b ed w ith the se mi-empirica l rela tion  by
 the_occurrence of_the second dredge-up during_the Early-AGB_of_intermediate-mass stars,_that_causes a significant_reduction of their_core masses.

In Table \[tab\_mc1\] of_Appendix \[app\_fit\] we present_the_fitting coefficients that we derive following the parametrization proposed by @WagenGroen_98, for several metallicities._In_each panel_of_Fig. \[fig\_mc1\]_the fitting curves are over-imposed_to the `PARSEC` data for_$M_{\rm c,1}$._We note, however, that our TP-AGB calculations use_the_true $M_{\rm c,1}$_values, and not those derived from the formulas.

TP-AGB evolution_{#ssec_tpagbev}
----------------

For each stellar model with initial_parameters $(M_{\rm i},Z_{\rm_i})$_the_characteristic quantities at the_$1^{\rm st}$ thermal pulse (core mass,_luminosity, effective temperature, envelope chemical composition),_obtained from the [*PARSEC*]{} database, are fed_as initial conditions to the `COLIBRI`_code, which computes the TP-AGB_evolution until_when almost the entire envelope_is lost by_stellar winds._Operatively the `COLIBRI`_calculations are stopped when the mass_of the residual_envelope falls below a limit of_$0.002_M_{\odot} -0.005 M_{\odot}$._At_this_stage all_evolutionary tracks are_already_evolving off_the_AGB towards higher effective temperatures, with_a_luminosity that depends mainly on the mass_of the C-O core,_and_the phase of the_pulse cycle at which the_last event of mass ejection took_place (see_Fig \[fig\_hr\]).

For the_present work we adopt a specific set of prescriptions for the_mass loss and the third dredge-up,_which we briefly outline_below. These_models_will serve as_a_reference case_for our ongoing TP-AGB calibration, and therefore_the current_parameters may be somewhat changed in_future calculations. Anyhow, from_various_preliminary tests made with the present_models, we expect that they already_yield a fairly good description_of_the_TP-AGB phase.

#### Mass loss. {#mass-loss..unnumbered}

It_has been included under the hypothesis_that it is_driven by two main mechanisms, dominating at_different_stages. Initially, before radiation pressure on_dust_grains becomes the main agent of_stellar_winds,_mass loss is described with_the semi-empirical relation by