}$ generate the cumulants of $\xi(t)$ (see e.g. [@JacobsStochasticBook]). Fourier transforming these cumulants yields the polyspectra, which completely characterizes the noise in the frequency domain [@Rao1984book]. In the quantum case, our noise is a Heisenberg picture operator $\hat{\xi}(t)$ whose evolution is generated by the Hamiltonian of some bath; we take $\hat{\xi}(t)$ to be Hermitian for simplicity. Defining correlation functions now has some subtlety, as $\hat{\xi}(t)$ will not in general commute with itself at different times; hence, different time-ordering choices yield different results. Correlation functions at a given order describe both how the bath responds to external perturbations, as well as its intrinsic fluctuations [@Kamenev2011book]. We are interested here in characterizing the latter quantity, and asking whether these fluctuations are equivalent to an effective classical noise process.

The well-developed machinery of Keldysh quantum field theory provides a precise method for accomplishing our task [@Levitov1996; @Nazarov2003; @BelzigPRL2010; @Clerk2011; @Hofer2017]. While this approach is completely general, the simplest derivation is to imagine coupling an ancilla qubit to $\hat{\xi}$, such that the only qubit dynamics is from the interaction picture Hamiltonian $\hat H_{\mathrm{int}} (t) = \frac{1}{2} F(t) \hat{\xi}(t)  \hat \sigma_z$. We then use the dephasing of the qubit to [*define*]{} the MGF of the noise in the quantum case, exactly like we would if the noise were classical: $$\begin{aligned}
\label{Eq:MGFqu}
  &   \Lambda[F( t );t_f] \equiv 
         \langle \hat{\sigma}_{-}(t) \rangle / \langle \hat{\sigma}_{-}(0) \rangle,
         \\
                \label{Eq:MGFK}
         = &
        \textrm{Tr} \left[
            \mathcal{T} e^{- \frac{i}{2} \int_0^{t_f} dt' F(t') \hat{\xi}(t')}
            \hat{\rho}_{\rm B}
            \tilde{\mathcal{T}} e^{-\frac{i}{2} \int_
} $ generate the cumulants of $ \xi(t)$ (see e.g.   [ @JacobsStochasticBook ]). Fourier transforming these cumulants render the polyspectra, which wholly characterizes the noise in the frequency knowledge domain [ @Rao1984book ]. In the quantum lawsuit, our noise is a Heisenberg picture hustler $ \hat{\xi}(t)$ whose evolution is generated by the Hamiltonian of some bath; we carry $ \hat{\xi}(t)$ to be Hermitian for simplicity. Defining correlation coefficient functions now take some subtlety, as $ \hat{\xi}(t)$ will not in general commute with itself at different times; hence, different clock time - ordering choices yield unlike results. Correlation function at a given ordering describe both how the bath responds to external perturbations, as well as its intrinsic fluctuation [ @Kamenev2011book ]. We are interested here in characterizing the latter quantity, and asking whether these fluctuations are equivalent to an effective classical noise process. 

 The well - developed machinery of Keldysh quantum field theory provides a precise method for accomplishing our task [ @Levitov1996; @Nazarov2003; @BelzigPRL2010; @Clerk2011; @Hofer2017 ]. While this approach is wholly cosmopolitan, the simplest derivation is to imagine pair an ancilla qubit to $ \hat{\xi}$, such that the only qubit dynamics is from the interaction picture Hamiltonian $ \hat H_{\mathrm{int } } (t) = \frac{1}{2 } F(t) \hat{\xi}(t)   \hat \sigma_z$. We then practice the dephasing of the qubit to [ * define * ] { } the MGF of the noise in the quantum shell, exactly like we would if the noise were authoritative: $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 \label{Eq: MGFqu } 
   &    \Lambda[F (t); t_f ] \equiv 
          \langle \hat{\sigma}_{-}(t) \rangle / \langle \hat{\sigma}_{-}(0) \rangle, 
          \\ 
                 \label{Eq: MGFK } 
          = & 
         \textrm{Tr } \left [ 
             \mathcal{T } e^{- \frac{i}{2 } \int_0^{t_f } dt' F(t') \hat{\xi}(t') } 
             \hat{\rho}_{\rm B } 
             \tilde{\mathcal{T } } e^{-\frac{i}{2 } \int _
}$ gejerate the cumulants of $\wi(t)$ (see e.g. [@JacobsStochasvicBook]). Fourier transforming these cumulantd tieldw the polyspectra, whicf completvly charaxtermzes the noise ii the frczuendn domcii [@Rao1984book]. In thg quantum cave, our noise iv x Keisenberg picture operator $\hat{\xi}(t)$ wrose evplktion is generwted fy tgv Mamiltonian of some bath; we take $\hat{\xi}(t)$ to be Hermitoan for simplicity. Defininh cogrelation functiond now has sime fybtlety, as $\hxt{\xi}(t)$ will not in genetal commute with itself at diffefent cimes; hence, duffftent time-ordxring bhoices yield differett resukts. Correlatiok funrtiobs at a given order dxscribe both how the bath res[ouds to external pertuebqtionv, as welu as ita mntdinsic flnctuations [@Iamenev2011book]. We are interested newv in charactedizing tre latter quantity, and asking whether tvess fluctuations are equicalent to an effectivg classicaj noise process.

The well-developed machinery of Kelgysh sjanuun fieue hheory provides a precise method for accomplifgimg our task [@Levibov1996; @Nazarov2003; @BelzigLRP2010; @Vjerk2011; @Hofer2017]. Whkle thna zpproach is complehely gegeral, the simpjest derivation is to imagine ciupling an auciola qubit to $\hat{\xi}$, such that che onky qunit dynamics is from thz intedaction pichure Hamimgonian $\hat H_{\mathfm{ikt}} (d) = \frac{1}{2} F(t) \hat{\xi}(t)  \hat \sigia_z$. We thxn usz the deohasong of the qubit to [*dcxine*]{} the MGF of thf noide in the quwntum case, exactly like we woulv if the noisg ware classiccl: $$\begln{aligned}
\label{Ez:MGFqu}
  &   \Lamyda[F( t );t_y] \equix 
         \langle \hat{\sigma}_{-}(t) \wangle / \langla \hat{\sigma}_{-}(0) \raigle,
         \\
                \label{Eq:MGFL}
         = &
        \rextrm{Tr} \left[
            \mathcal{T} e^{- \fxcc{u}{2} \int_0^{t_f} dt' F(t') \hst{\xk}(t')}
            \hat{\rho}_{\rm B}
            \tilde{\mathccl{G}} e^{-\ftac{i}{2} \int_
}$ generate the cumulants of $\xi(t)$ (see Fourier these cumulants the polyspectra, which the domain [@Rao1984book]. In quantum case, our is a Heisenberg picture operator $\hat{\xi}(t)$ evolution is generated by the Hamiltonian of some bath; we take $\hat{\xi}(t)$ to Hermitian for simplicity. Defining correlation functions now has some subtlety, as $\hat{\xi}(t)$ will in commute itself different times; hence, different time-ordering choices yield different results. Correlation functions at a given order describe how the bath responds to external perturbations, as as its intrinsic fluctuations We are interested here in the quantity, and whether fluctuations equivalent to an classical noise process. The well-developed machinery of Keldysh quantum field theory provides a precise method for accomplishing task [@Levitov1996; @Clerk2011; @Hofer2017]. this is general, the simplest to imagine coupling an ancilla qubit that the only qubit dynamics is from the picture Hamiltonian H_{\mathrm{int}} (t) = \frac{1}{2} F(t) \hat{\xi}(t) \sigma_z$. We then use the dephasing of the to [*define*]{} the MGF of the noise in the quantum case, exactly like we would noise were classical: $$\begin{aligned} & \Lambda[F( t \equiv \hat{\sigma}_{-}(t) / \hat{\sigma}_{-}(0) \rangle, \label{Eq:MGFK} = & \textrm{Tr} \left[ \mathcal{T} e^{- \frac{i}{2} \int_0^{t_f} dt' F(t') \hat{\rho}_{\rm B} \tilde{\mathcal{T}} e^{-\frac{i}{2} \int_
}$ generate the cumulants of $\xi(t)$ (See e.g. [@JacobSStocHasTicboOk]). FoUrieR transforming tHEse cUmulants yields the polysPectrA, wHIch cOMpLetelY characTErIZEs tHe NoIse In THe FrequEncY domain [@rao1984book]. In tHe qUaNtum case, our nOIsE is a HeisenBerG picture operAtoR $\hat{\xi}(T)$ wHosE EvoluTioN is geNerateD By the HAmiltoniaN oF Some baTH; we take $\HAT{\xI}(t)$ to Be Hermitian for simPLiCIty. Defining corRelatiOn FUnCTIonS noW has some suBtLety, aS $\Hat{\xi}(t)$ wILl NOT In gENeral commute wIth itself at DIffErent tImEs; hENce, difFerenT tIMe-oRdering choiCes yIeld diffeRent reSUlts. CorRElation FunctiOns At a GiveN OrDeR deScRIbe BOtH hoW The Bath respOnDs To extErnaL PERTurbAtiOns, aS well As its intrinsiC flUctuATioNs [@KamEnev2011bOok]. WE aRe intEresteD here In Characterizing tHe laTter quantIty, AnD asKiNg wheTHer theSe fLucTuationS are equIValEnT TO An Effective classical NoISE pRocess.

ThE well-dEVeLoPEd machinErY of keldYSH quanTum fIElD theory pRovideS A pReCise metHoD for acCoMplIshIng ouR Task [@levitoV1996; @Nazarov2003; @belziGpRL2010; @Clerk2011; @Hofer2017]. WHIle this approaCH iS COmPLeteLy gEneral, the siMpleST derIvatIOn Is tO ImagiNe couPlINg AN ancilla qubit to $\hat{\xI}$, sUch thaT the oNly qubit dynamIcs is from tHE INteractiOn piCTuRE Hamiltonian $\haT H_{\matHrm{int}} (t) = \fraC{1}{2} f(t) \hat{\xi}(t)  \Hat \siGma_z$. We thEn use the dEPHasing of The QubIt tO [*deFINe*]{} The MGF of the noISE in tHe Quantum CasE, exactlY liKe wE woUld If The noise wEre classIcAl: $$\BeGiN{alIgned}
\LAbel{Eq:MGfqU}
  &   \LaMbDa[F( T );t_f] \eqUIv 
         \langLe \hat{\SigmA}_{-}(t) \RaNGle / \Langle \hAT{\sIGMa}_{-}(0) \raNgLe,
         \\
                \LabeL{Eq:mGfK}
         = &
        \texTrm{TR} \LefT[
            \mathcaL{T} e^{- \frac{i}{2} \iNt_0^{t_F} Dt' F(t') \HaT{\xI}(t')}
            \hat{\rhO}_{\rm B}
            \tilde{\mathCaL{T}} e^{-\frac{i}{2} \inT_
}$ generate the cumulantsof $\xi(t) $ (se e e .g.  [ @Jac obsS tochasticBook] ) . Fo urier transforming the se cu mu l ants yi eldsthe pol y sp e c tra ,wh ich  c o mp letel y c haracte rizes thenoi se  in the freq u en cy domain[@R ao1984book].  In  the q ua ntu m  case , o ur no ise is a Heis enberg pi ct u re ope r ator $\ h a t{ \xi} (t)$ whose evolut i on is generated b y theHa m il t o nia n o f some bat h;  we t a ke $\ha t {\ x i } (t) $  to be Hermit ian for sim p lic ity. D ef ini n g corr elati on fun ctions nowhassome subt lety,a s $\hat { \xi}(t) $ will  no t i n ge n er al  co mm u tew it h i t sel f at dif fe re nt ti mes; h e n ce,dif fere nt ti me-ordering c hoi cesy iel d dif feren t re su lts.Correl ation  f unctions at a g iven  order de scr ib e b ot h how the ba thres ponds t o exter n alpe r t u rb ations, as well as  i t s  i ntrinsic  fluct u at io n s [@Kame ne v20 11bo o k ]. We  are in terested  herei nch aracter iz ing th elat ter  quan t ity,  and a sking wh ether these fluctuat i ons are equiv a le n t  t o  aneff ective clas sica l  noi se p r oc ess . 

The  well -d e ve l oped machinery of K el dysh q uantu m field theor y provides a precisemeth o df or accomplishi ng ou r task [@L e vitov199 6; @N azarov20 03; @Belz i g PRL2010;  @C ler k20 11; @ Ho fer2017]. Whi l e  thi sapproac h i s compl ete lygen era l,  the simp lest der iv at io nisto im a gine cou pl ing  a n a ncill a  qubit  to $ \hat {\ xi } $,such th a tt h e on ly  q ubit  dy na micsis f r omthe int eractionpic t ureHa mi ltonian  $\hat H_{\ma th rm{int}} ( t)  =\frac{ 1 } {2} F(t)  \hat{\xi}(t)  \hat \si g ma_z$.Wethenusethe depha sin g of t heq ubit t o [*de fine* ]{ } t h e  MGFo f  t heno ise in the q uan tum c as e, e xactlylike we would if t h e n oise were cla ssi cal: $ $\ beg i n{ a lig ne d }
\ l a bel{Eq:MGFqu}
 &   \Lamb da [ F(  t );t_f]\ equ iv  
        \la ngle\ hat{\si gma}_{-}( t) \rangl e/ \l a n gle  \hat{\sig ma}_{-}( 0) \rangl e ,
      \\ 
            \l abel{E q :MG FK}
      = &
      \ textrm{T r} \left[
            \ mathca l{T}e^{ - \frac{i }{2 }  \i nt_0^{t_f } dt ' F(t') \h at{ \xi }(t') }
       \h at{ \ rho}_ {\rm B}
        \ t il de{\mathcal { T } } e ^{-\f rac { i}{2}\int _
}$ generate_the cumulants_of $\xi(t)$ (see e.g. [@JacobsStochasticBook])._Fourier transforming_these_cumulants yields_the_polyspectra, which completely_characterizes the noise_in the frequency domain_[@Rao1984book]. In the_quantum_case, our noise is a Heisenberg picture operator $\hat{\xi}(t)$ whose evolution is generated by_the_Hamiltonian of_some_bath;_we take $\hat{\xi}(t)$ to be_Hermitian for simplicity. Defining correlation_functions now_has some subtlety, as $\hat{\xi}(t)$ will not in_general_commute with itself_at different times; hence, different time-ordering choices yield different_results. Correlation functions at a given_order describe both_how_the_bath responds to external_perturbations, as well as its intrinsic_fluctuations [@Kamenev2011book]. We are interested here_in characterizing the latter quantity, and asking_whether these fluctuations are equivalent to_an effective classical noise process.

The_well-developed machinery_of Keldysh quantum field theory_provides a precise_method for_accomplishing our task_[@Levitov1996; @Nazarov2003; @BelzigPRL2010; @Clerk2011; @Hofer2017]. While_this approach is_completely general, the simplest derivation is_to_imagine coupling an_ancilla_qubit_to $\hat{\xi}$,_such that the_only_qubit dynamics_is_from the interaction picture Hamiltonian $\hat_H_{\mathrm{int}}_(t) = \frac{1}{2} F(t) \hat{\xi}(t)  \hat_\sigma_z$. We then use_the_dephasing of the qubit_to [*define*]{} the MGF of_the noise in the quantum case,_exactly like_we would_if the noise were classical: $$\begin{aligned}
\label{Eq:MGFqu}
  &   \Lambda[F(_t );t_f] \equiv 
  _   _ _\langle_\hat{\sigma}_{-}(t) \rangle /_\langle_\hat{\sigma}_{-}(0) \rangle,
_      _ \\
_     _   __    \label{Eq:MGFK}
 _     _ = &
  ___   \textrm{Tr} \left[
_     _  _  \mathcal{T} e^{- \frac{i}{2} \int_0^{t_f} dt'_F(t')_\hat{\xi}(t')}
     __     \hat{\rho}_{\rm_B}
__    _     \tilde{\mathcal{T}}_e^{-\frac{i}{2} \int_