{I}_{N_t} - \frac{\bar{\lambda}_k}{\gamma_k}\big(\mathbf{I}_{N_t} +\sum_{j\neq k} \bar{\lambda}_j \mathbf{h}_{Pj}\mathbf{h}_{Pj}^H\big)^{-\frac{1}{2}}  \mathbf{h}_{Pk} \mathbf{h}_{Pk}^H\big(\mathbf{I}_{N_t} \nonumber\\
  & \quad\qquad+\sum_{j\neq k} \bar{\lambda}_j \mathbf{h}_{Pj}\mathbf{h}_{Pj}^H\big)^{-\frac{H}{2}} \succeq \mathbf{0}_{N_t}, \forall k.\end{aligned}$$

The positive semi-definite constraint in (\[E:semi-definite\]) means that the minimal eigenvalue of the matrix in the left-hand side should be non-negative. Note that the term $\left(\mathbf{I}_{N_t} +\sum_{j\neq k} \bar{\lambda}_j \mathbf{h}_{Pj}\mathbf{h}_{Pj}^H\right)^{-\frac{1}{2}}$ $\mathbf{h}_{Pk} \mathbf{h}_{Pk}^H\left(\mathbf{I}_{N_t} +\sum_{j\neq k} \bar{\lambda}_j \mathbf{h}_{Pj}\mathbf{h}_{Pj}^H\right)^{-\frac{H}{2}}$ is of rank one. It has only one positive eigenvalue, which is $\mathbf{h}_{Pk}^H\left(\mathbf{I}_{N_t} +\sum_{j\neq k} \bar{\lambda}_j \mathbf{h}_{Pj}\mathbf{h}_{Pj}^H\right)^{-1} \mathbf{h}_{Pk}$, and all other eigenvalues are zeros. Therefore, the constraint in (\[E:semi-definite\]) can be further converted into the constraint on the minimal eigenvalue of the matrix in the left-hand side of (\[E:semi-definite\]) as $$1 - \frac{\bar{\lambda}_k}{\gamma_k}\mathbf{h}_{Pk}^H\left(\mathbf{I}_{N_t} +\sum_{j\neq k} \bar{\lambda}_j \mathbf
{ I}_{N_t } - \frac{\bar{\lambda}_k}{\gamma_k}\big(\mathbf{I}_{N_t } + \sum_{j\neq k } \bar{\lambda}_j \mathbf{h}_{Pj}\mathbf{h}_{Pj}^H\big)^{-\frac{1}{2 } }   \mathbf{h}_{Pk } \mathbf{h}_{Pk}^H\big(\mathbf{I}_{N_t } \nonumber\\ 
   & \quad\qquad+\sum_{j\neq k } \bar{\lambda}_j \mathbf{h}_{Pj}\mathbf{h}_{Pj}^H\big)^{-\frac{H}{2 } } \succeq \mathbf{0}_{N_t }, \forall k.\end{aligned}$$ 

 The positive semi - definite constraint in (\[E: semi - definite\ ]) means that the minimal eigenvalue of the matrix in the left - bridge player slope should be non - negative. Note that the term $ \left(\mathbf{I}_{N_t } + \sum_{j\neq k } \bar{\lambda}_j \mathbf{h}_{Pj}\mathbf{h}_{Pj}^H\right)^{-\frac{1}{2}}$ $ \mathbf{h}_{Pk } \mathbf{h}_{Pk}^H\left(\mathbf{I}_{N_t } + \sum_{j\neq k } \bar{\lambda}_j \mathbf{h}_{Pj}\mathbf{h}_{Pj}^H\right)^{-\frac{H}{2}}$ is of social station one. It has only one positivist eigenvalue, which is $ \mathbf{h}_{Pk}^H\left(\mathbf{I}_{N_t } + \sum_{j\neq k } \bar{\lambda}_j \mathbf{h}_{Pj}\mathbf{h}_{Pj}^H\right)^{-1 } \mathbf{h}_{Pk}$, and all early eigenvalues are zeros. Therefore, the constraint in (\[E: semi - definite\ ]) can be further convert into the constraint on the minimal eigenvalue of the matrix in the left - hand side of (\[E: semi - definite\ ]) as $ $ 1 - \frac{\bar{\lambda}_k}{\gamma_k}\mathbf{h}_{Pk}^H\left(\mathbf{I}_{N_t } + \sum_{j\neq k } \bar{\lambda}_j \mathbf
{I}_{N_t} - \frac{\bar{\lambda}_k}{\gamma_k}\bin(\mathbf{I}_{N_t} +\sum_{j\ngq k} \bar{\nambda}_n \mathbf{f}_{Pj}\mathbf{h}_{Pj}^H\big)^{-\frac{1}{2}}  \mathbf{i}_{Pk} \nathbd{h}_{Pk}^H\big(\mathbf{I}_{N_t} \nonuober\\
  & \quwd\qquad+\sym_{j\ntq k} \bar{\lambda}_j \mefhbf{h}_{Pj}\mathbf{g}_{Ij}^H\biy)^{-\fcac{H}{2}} \succeq \matmbf{0}_{N_t}, \foraln k.\end{aligned}$$

Tve plsitive semi-definite constraint in (\[Q:semi-degijite\]) means thaj the iinijal eigenvalue of the matrix in ths left-hend side should be non-negative. Note that hhe herm $\left(\mathbf{I}_{N_t} +\sum_{j\neq k} \var{\lwnbda}_j \mathbf{f}_{Pj}\mathbf{h}_{Kj}^K\right)^{-\frac{1}{2}}$ $\jathbf{h}_{Pk} \mathbf{h}_{Pk}^H\left(\mathbf{I}_{V_t} +\suk_{j\neq k} \bat{\lzmhga}_j \mathbf{h}_{'j}\mathff{h}_{Pj}^H\right)^{-\fvsc{H}{2}}$ is of ranl one. It has okly oie pisitive eigenvalue, whmch is $\mathbf{h}_{Pk}^H\lefj(\mathbf{I}_{N_t} +\sbm_{j\neq k} \bar{\lambda}_j \mqtybf{h}_{Pb}\matvbf{h}_{Oh}^H\rkghu)^{-1} \methgf{h}_{Pk}$, wnd all other eigenvaluew are zeros. Therefote, nne constrainf in (\[E:feii-definite\]) can be further converted intm tge constraint on the mibimal eigenvalue of tje matrix in the left-hand side of (\[E:semi-definite\]) as $$1 - \frac{\bdr{\lamudx}_k}{\gcnma_k}\mxrhhf{h}_{Pk}^H\left(\mathbf{I}_{N_t} +\sum_{j\neq k} \bar{\lambda}_j \mathfr
{I}_{N_t} - \frac{\bar{\lambda}_k}{\gamma_k}\big(\mathbf{I}_{N_t} +\sum_{j\neq k} \bar{\lambda}_j \mathbf{h}_{Pj}\mathbf{h}_{Pj}^H\big)^{-\frac{1}{2}} \nonumber\\ \quad\qquad+\sum_{j\neq k} \mathbf{h}_{Pj}\mathbf{h}_{Pj}^H\big)^{-\frac{H}{2}} \succeq \mathbf{0}_{N_t}, constraint (\[E:semi-definite\]) means that minimal eigenvalue of matrix in the left-hand side should non-negative. Note that the term $\left(\mathbf{I}_{N_t} +\sum_{j\neq k} \bar{\lambda}_j \mathbf{h}_{Pj}\mathbf{h}_{Pj}^H\right)^{-\frac{1}{2}}$ $\mathbf{h}_{Pk} \mathbf{h}_{Pk}^H\left(\mathbf{I}_{N_t} +\sum_{j\neq \bar{\lambda}_j \mathbf{h}_{Pj}\mathbf{h}_{Pj}^H\right)^{-\frac{H}{2}}$ is of rank one. It has only one positive eigenvalue, which $\mathbf{h}_{Pk}^H\left(\mathbf{I}_{N_t} k} \mathbf{h}_{Pj}\mathbf{h}_{Pj}^H\right)^{-1} and all other eigenvalues are zeros. Therefore, the constraint in (\[E:semi-definite\]) can be further converted into constraint on the minimal eigenvalue of the matrix the left-hand side of as $$1 - \frac{\bar{\lambda}_k}{\gamma_k}\mathbf{h}_{Pk}^H\left(\mathbf{I}_{N_t} +\sum_{j\neq \bar{\lambda}_j
{I}_{N_t} - \frac{\bar{\lambda}_k}{\gamma_k}\biG(\mathbf{I}_{N_t} +\Sum_{j\nEq k} \Bar{\LaMbda}_J \matHbf{h}_{Pj}\mathbf{h}_{PJ}^h\big)^{-\Frac{1}{2}}  \mathbf{h}_{Pk} \mathbf{h}_{Pk}^h\big(\mAtHBf{I}_{N_T} \NoNumbeR\\
  & \quad\qqUAd+\SUM_{j\nEq K} \bAr{\lAmBDa}_J \mathBf{h}_{pj}\mathbF{h}_{Pj}^H\big)^{-\frAc{H}{2}} \SuCceq \mathbf{0}_{N_t}, \FOrAll k.\end{aliGneD}$$

The positive SemI-definItE coNStraiNt iN (\[E:semI-definITe\]) meanS that the mInIMal eigENvalue oF THe MatrIx in the left-hand siDE sHOuld be non-negatIve. NotE tHAt THE teRm $\lEft(\mathbf{I}_{n_t} +\Sum_{j\nEQ k} \bar{\laMBdA}_J \MAthBF{h}_{Pj}\mathbf{h}_{Pj}^h\right)^{-\frac{1}{2}}$ $\mAThbF{h}_{Pk} \maThBf{h}_{pK}^H\left(\MathbF{I}_{n_T} +\suM_{j\neq k} \bar{\laMbda}_J \mathbf{h}_{PJ}\mathbF{H}_{Pj}^H\rigHT)^{-\frac{H}{2}}$ iS of ranK onE. It Has oNLy OnE poSiTIve EIgEnvALue, Which is $\mAtHbF{h}_{Pk}^H\Left(\MATHBf{I}_{N_T} +\suM_{j\neQ k} \bar{\Lambda}_j \mathbf{H}_{Pj}\MathBF{h}_{PJ}^H\rigHt)^{-1} \matHbf{h}_{pk}$, And alL other EigenVaLues are zeros. TheRefoRe, the consTraInT in (\[e:sEmi-deFInite\]) cAn bE fuRther coNverted INto ThE CONsTraint on the minimal EiGENvAlue of thE matriX In ThE Left-hand SiDe oF (\[E:seMI-DefinIte\]) aS $$1 - \FrAc{\bar{\lamBda}_k}{\gaMMa_K}\mAthbf{h}_{PK}^H\Left(\maThBf{I}_{n_t} +\sUm_{j\neQ K} \bar{\Lambda}_J \mathbf
{I}_{N_t} - \frac{\bar{\la mbda}_k}{\ gamma _k} \bi g( \mat hbf{ I}_{N_t} +\sum _ {j\n eq k} \bar{\lambda}_j\math bf { h}_{ P j} \math bf{h}_{ P j} ^ H \bi g) ^{ -\f ra c {1 }{2}}   \ mathbf{ h}_{Pk} \m ath bf {h}_{Pk}^H\b i g( \mathbf{I} _{N _t} \nonumbe r\\ 
  & \ qu ad\ q quad+ \su m_{j\ neq k} \bar{\ lambda}_j  \ m athbf{ h }_{Pj}\ m a th bf{h }_{Pj}^H\big)^{-\ f ra c {H}{2}} \succe q \mat hb f {0 } _ {N_ t},  \forall k .\ end{a l igned}$ $ 
T h e  po s itive semi-de finite cons t rai nt in(\ [E: s emi-de finit e\ ] ) m eans that t he m inimal ei genval u e of th e  matrix  in th e l eft -han d  s id e s ho u ldb enon - neg ative. N ot ethatthet e r m  $\l eft (\ma thbf{ I}_{N_t} +\su m_{ j\ne q  k}  \bar {\lam bda} _j  \mat hbf{h} _{Pj} \m athbf{h}_{Pj}^H \rig ht)^{-\fr ac{ 1} {2} }$  $\ma t hbf{h} _{P k}\mathbf {h}_{Pk } ^H\ le f t ( \m athbf{I}_{N_t} +\s um _ { j\ neq k} \ bar{\l a mb da } _j \math bf {h} _{Pj } \ mathb f{h} _ {P j}^H\rig ht)^{- \ fr ac {H}{2}} $is ofra nkone . Ith as o nly on e positi ve ei g envalue, which is $\mathbf{h } _{ P k }^ H \lef t(\ mathbf{I}_{ N_t} +\su m_{j \ ne q k }  \bar {\lam bd a }_ j  \mathbf{h}_{Pj}\ma th bf{h}_ {Pj}^ H\right)^{-1}  \mathbf{h } _ { Pk}$, an d al l  o t her eigenvalue s are  zeros. Th e refore,the c onstrain t in (\[E : s emi-defi nit e\] ) c anb e  f urther conver t e d in to  the co nst raint o n t hemin ima leigenvalu e of the  m at ri xinthe l e ft-handsi deof  (\ [E:se m i-defi nite\ ]) a s$$ 1  -\frac{\ b ar { \ lamb da }_ k}{\ gam ma _k}\m athb f {h} _{Pk}^H \left(\ma thb f {I}_ {N _t } +\sum _{j\neq k} \b ar {\lambda}_ j\ma thbf
{I}_{N_t} -_\frac{\bar{\lambda}_k}{\gamma_k}\big(\mathbf{I}_{N_t} +\sum_{j\neq_k} \bar{\lambda}_j \mathbf{h}_{Pj}\mathbf{h}_{Pj}^H\big)^{-\frac{1}{2}} _\mathbf{h}_{Pk} \mathbf{h}_{Pk}^H\big(\mathbf{I}_{N_t}_\nonumber\\
_ &_\quad\qquad+\sum_{j\neq_k} \bar{\lambda}_j \mathbf{h}_{Pj}\mathbf{h}_{Pj}^H\big)^{-\frac{H}{2}}_\succeq \mathbf{0}_{N_t}, \forall_k.\end{aligned}$$

The positive semi-definite constraint_in (\[E:semi-definite\]) means_that_the minimal eigenvalue of the matrix in the left-hand side should be non-negative. Note_that_the term_$\left(\mathbf{I}_{N_t}_+\sum_{j\neq_k} \bar{\lambda}_j \mathbf{h}_{Pj}\mathbf{h}_{Pj}^H\right)^{-\frac{1}{2}}$ $\mathbf{h}_{Pk} \mathbf{h}_{Pk}^H\left(\mathbf{I}_{N_t}_+\sum_{j\neq k} \bar{\lambda}_j \mathbf{h}_{Pj}\mathbf{h}_{Pj}^H\right)^{-\frac{H}{2}}$ is_of rank_one. It has only one positive eigenvalue, which_is_$\mathbf{h}_{Pk}^H\left(\mathbf{I}_{N_t} +\sum_{j\neq k}_\bar{\lambda}_j \mathbf{h}_{Pj}\mathbf{h}_{Pj}^H\right)^{-1} \mathbf{h}_{Pk}$, and all other eigenvalues are zeros._Therefore, the constraint in (\[E:semi-definite\]) can_be further converted_into_the_constraint on the minimal_eigenvalue of the matrix in the_left-hand side of (\[E:semi-definite\]) as $$1_- \frac{\bar{\lambda}_k}{\gamma_k}\mathbf{h}_{Pk}^H\left(\mathbf{I}_{N_t} +\sum_{j\neq k} \bar{\lambda}_j \mathbf