0\] Let $f\colon \mathbb{R} \to [0,\infty)$ be a continuous function verifying $(F_1)-(F_3)$. Then, there exists $\bar{\lambda}>0$ such that for $\lambda>\bar{\lambda}$ the problem $(P_{\lambda})$ admits two nonnegative solutions $u_{\lambda}, v_{\lambda} \in X^s_0(\Omega)$. Moreover, $0\le u_\lambda < v_{\lambda}\le 1$.

The main ideas behind of the proof relies on known arguments for solving this type of problems. However, this issue is non-trivial, by which we need to treat the problema under an appropriate approach that allows to apply such arguments and, in this way, to save several technical difficulties that arise in the nonlocal case.

Specifically, we obtain the first solution $u _{\lambda}$ by truncating the nonlinearity and taking $\lambda$ large enough, where we have assumed only the local condition at zero ($F_1$). The behavior of the norms, according to the parameter $\lambda $ of the possible solutions, is based on the De Giorgi-Nash-Moser theory, precisely on Moser’s iterative scheme. Such procedure was introduced in the mid 1950s and early 1960s, we refer to [@DeGiorgi; @Moser]. An important fact in the proof is that the functional energy associated with the truncated problem has the Mountain Pass (MP) geometry. Thus, we can control, in terms of the parameter $\lambda$, the MP level and the norm of the MP solution.

Respect to the second solution, we impose the conditions ($F_2$) and ($F_3$) on $f$, which widely known when applying the sub- and super-solution method in problems like (\[P\]) with $s=1$. Here we show that this idea still remains hold by defining properly sub- and super-solutions in our nonlocal context, it is when $0<s<1$.

The document is organized as follows: in Section 2 we offer a brief review of the fractional spaces of Sobolev in the context of our problem and remember some useful results. In Section 3 we look for the first solution, while in Section 3 we find the second solution, which ends the proof of Theorem \[main-theorem0\]

Functional framework and preliminaries {#section2}
======================================

In this section, we offer a
0\ ] Let $ f\colon \mathbb{R } \to [ 0,\infty)$ be a continuous function verifying $ (F_1)-(F_3)$. Then, there exists $ \bar{\lambda}>0 $ such that for $ \lambda>\bar{\lambda}$ the trouble $ (P_{\lambda})$ admit two nonnegative solutions $ u_{\lambda }, v_{\lambda } \in X^s_0(\Omega)$. Moreover, $ 0\le u_\lambda < v_{\lambda}\le 1$. 

 The chief mind behind of the proof relies on know arguments for solving this character of trouble. However, this issue is non - superficial, by which we need to treat the problema under an appropriate approach path that admit to apply such arguments and, in this way, to save several technical trouble that arise in the nonlocal case. 

 Specifically, we obtain the beginning solution $ u _ { \lambda}$ by truncating the nonlinearity and taking $ \lambda$ large enough, where we have assume only the local condition at zero ($ F_1 $). The behavior of the norms, according to the argument $ \lambda $ of the possible solutions, is based on the De Giorgi - Nash - Moser theory, precisely on Moser ’s iterative scheme. Such procedure was introduce in the mid 1950s and early 1960s, we refer to [ @DeGiorgi; @Moser ]. An important fact in the proof is that the functional energy associated with the truncated problem have the Mountain Pass (MP) geometry. Thus, we can control, in terms of the argument $ \lambda$, the MP degree and the norm of the MP solution. 

 Respect to the second solution, we impose the conditions ($ F_2 $) and ($ F_3 $) on $ f$, which widely known when applying the sub- and ace - solution method in problems like (\[P\ ]) with $ s=1$. Here we show that this idea still remains hold by defining properly sub- and super - solutions in our nonlocal context, it is when $ 0 < s<1$. 

 The document is organize as watch: in Section 2 we offer a brief review of the fractional spaces of Sobolev in the context of our trouble and remember some useful results. In Section 3 we look for the first solution, while in Section 3 we find the second solution, which ends the validation of Theorem \[main - theorem0\ ] 

 Functional framework and preliminaries { # section2 } 
 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 

 In this section, we offer a
0\] Leh $f\colon \mathbb{R} \to [0,\inftn)$ be a continuous functmon verjfying $(F_1)-(W_3)$. Then, there exists $\bar{\lambde}>0$ suxh thqt for $\lambda>\bar{\lambda}$ the probpem $(P_{\lamvda})$ edmits two nonnejztive solutiohd $u_{\lcmuda}, v_{\lambda} \in W^s_0(\Omega)$. Moraover, $0\le u_\lambga < r_{\lambda}\le 1$.

The main ideas behind of tre proog gelies on knowg arbtmenfs for solving this type of problejs. Howener, this issue is non-trivial, by which we nefd tl treat the problela under an appwipriate appruach that allows to apkly such arguments and, in this wxy, to save sevetco tfwhnical difhicultpes that arisc in tha nonloval case.

Speciflcallb, we obtain the first solntion $u _{\lambda}$ by troncating tve nonlinearity and tqking $\lamtda$ uqrgd ehongh, where we have assujed only thw local condition au zqgp ($F_1$). The behabior os ehe norms, according to the parameter $\lakbdz $ of the possible solurions, is based on the De Giorgy-Nash-Moser theory, precisely on Moser’s iterative swheme. Ruck procdeuge was introduced in the mid 1950s and early 1960s, we degeg to [@DeGiorgi; @Moscr]. An important favt im the proof is that cge functional energy associwted qith the uruncsted problem has the Mountaun Pass (MP) gvomerry. Thus, we can coutrol, in teros og the parameter $\lambda$, the M' levem and the nlrm of ths MP solution.

Respdct tm the second solution, we iipose the conbitions ($W_2$) anc ($F_3$) on $f$, which wldely known when applyinh the sgb- and supfr-solution method in problems lmle (\[P\]) with $s=1$. Nese fe show chat tmis idea still wemains hold bi defininy propdrly sub- ahd supec-solutions ig our nonlocan context, it ms when $0<s<1$.

Ehe eocunent is urganized as fpllows: in Section 2 qe offer a brief rcview kf the fractioncu spaces of Sobokev in tje cjttext of our procleo and femember sond usrful results. In Secthon 3 we look for the forft solutuon, whilq in Section 3 we find the seconf solntion, xhich rndf the proof of Theorem \[main-thekrem0\]

Functlonwl framework and preliminarizs {#section2}
======================================

In this section, we offer a
0\] Let $f\colon \mathbb{R} \to [0,\infty)$ be function $(F_1)-(F_3)$. Then, exists $\bar{\lambda}>0$ such $(P_{\lambda})$ two nonnegative solutions v_{\lambda} \in X^s_0(\Omega)$. $0\le u_\lambda < v_{\lambda}\le 1$. The ideas behind of the proof relies on known arguments for solving this type problems. However, this issue is non-trivial, by which we need to treat the under appropriate that to apply such arguments and, in this way, to save several technical difficulties that arise in nonlocal case. Specifically, we obtain the first solution _{\lambda}$ by truncating the and taking $\lambda$ large enough, we assumed only local at ($F_1$). The behavior the norms, according to the parameter $\lambda $ of the possible solutions, is based on the De theory, precisely iterative scheme. procedure introduced the mid 1950s 1960s, we refer to [@DeGiorgi; @Moser]. in the proof is that the functional energy with the problem has the Mountain Pass (MP) Thus, we can control, in terms of the $\lambda$, the MP level and the norm of the MP solution. Respect to the second impose the conditions ($F_2$) ($F_3$) on $f$, widely when the and super-solution in problems like (\[P\]) with $s=1$. Here we show that this still remains hold by defining properly sub- and super-solutions in context, is when $0<s<1$. document is organized as in 2 we offer a of fractional in context our problem and remember useful results. In Section 3 look for the first we find the second solution, which ends the of Theorem \[main-theorem0\] Functional framework and preliminaries ====================================== In this section, we offer a
0\] Let $f\colon \mathbb{R} \to [0,\infty)$ be A continuouS funcTioN veRiFyinG $(F_1)-(F_3)$. THen, there exists $\BAr{\laMbda}>0$ such that for $\lambda>\bAr{\lamBdA}$ The pRObLem $(P_{\lAmbda})$ adMItS TWo nOnNeGatIvE SoLutioNs $u_{\Lambda}, v_{\Lambda} \in X^s_0(\omeGa)$. moreover, $0\le u_\lAMbDa < v_{\lambda}\lE 1$.

ThE main ideas beHinD of the PrOof RElies On kNown aRgumenTS for soLving this TyPE of proBLems. HowEVEr, This Issue is non-trivial, BY wHIch we need to treAt the pRoBLeMA UndEr aN appropriaTe ApproACh that aLLoWS TO apPLy such argumenTs and, in this WAy, tO save sEvEraL TechniCal diFfICulTies that ariSe in The nonlocAl case.

sPecificALly, we obTain thE fiRst SoluTIoN $u _{\LamBdA}$ By tRUnCatINg tHe nonlinEaRiTy and TakiNG $\LAMbda$ LarGe enOugh, wHere we have assUmeD onlY The Local CondiTion At Zero ($F_1$). the behAvior Of The norms, accordiNg to The parameTer $\LaMbdA $ oF the pOSsible SolUtiOns, is baSed on thE de GIoRGI-naSh-Moser theory, preciSeLY On moser’s itErativE ScHeME. Such proCeDurE was INTroduCed iN ThE mid 1950s and Early 1960s, WE rEfEr to [@DeGIoRgi; @MosEr]. an iMpoRtant FAct iN the prOof is thaT the fUNctional energy ASsociated with THe TRUnCAted ProBlem has the MOuntAIn PaSs (MP) GEoMetRY. Thus, We can CoNTrOL, in terms of the parameTeR $\lambdA$, the Mp level and the nOrm of the MP SOLUtion.

ResPect TO tHE second solutioN, we imPose the conDItions ($F_2$) aNd ($F_3$) on $F$, which wiDely known WHEn applyiNg tHe sUb- aNd sUPEr-Solution methoD IN proBlEms like (\[p\]) wiTh $s=1$. Here We sHow ThaT thIs Idea still Remains hOlD bY dEfIniNg proPErly sub- aNd SupEr-SolUtionS In our nOnlocAl coNtExT, It iS when $0<s<1$.

THE dOCUmenT iS oRganIzeD aS follOws: iN secTion 2 we oFfer a brieF reVIew oF tHe FractioNal spaces of SoBoLev in the coNtExt Of our pROBlem and rEmember some useful resultS. in SectiOn 3 wE look For tHe first soLutIon, whiLe iN sectioN 3 we finD the sEcOnd SOLutioN, WHiCh eNdS the proof oF tHeoRem \[maIn-TheoRem0\]

FuncTional framework and PRelIminaries {#sectIon2}
======================================

in thIS SeCtiON, wE OffEr A
0\] Let $f\colon \mathbb{R } \to [0,\ infty )$beacont inuo us function ve r ifyi ng $(F_1)-(F_3)$. Then , the re exis t s$\bar {\lambd a }> 0 $  su ch  t hat  f o r$\lam bda >\bar{\ lambda}$ t hepr oblem $(P_{\ l am bda})$ adm its  two nonnega tiv e solu ti ons $u_{\ lam bda},  v_{\l a mbda}\in X^s_0 (\ O mega)$ .  Moreov e r ,$0\l e u_\lambda < v_{ \ la m bda}\le 1$.

T he mai ni de a s  be hin d of the p ro of re l ies onk no w n arg u ments for sol ving this t y peof pro bl ems .  Howev er, t hi s  is sue is non- triv ial, by w hich w e  need t o  treatthe pr obl ema  und e ran  ap pr o pri a te  ap p roa ch thatal lo ws to  app l y s ucharg umen ts an d, in this wa y,to s a vesever al te chni ca l dif ficult ies t ha t arise in thenonl ocal case .
Sp eci fi cally ,  we ob tai n t he firs t solut i on$u _ { \l ambda}$ by truncat in g th e nonlin earity an dt aking $\ la mbd a$ l a r ge en ough ,  w here wehave a s su me d onlyth e loca lcon dit ion a t  zer o ($F_ 1$). The  beha v ior of the nor m s, accordingt ot h ep aram ete r $\lambda$ of theposs i bl e s o lutio ns, i sb as e d on the De Giorgi- Na sh-Mos er th eory, precise ly on Mose r ’ s  iterati ve s c he m e. Such proced ure w as introdu c ed in th e mid  1950s a nd early1 9 60s, weref erto[@D e G io rgi; @Moser]. A n im po rtant f act  in the  pr oof  is  th at  the func tional e ne rg yas soc iated with the  t run ca ted  prob l em has  theMoun ta in Pas s (MP)g eo m e try.  T hu s, w e c an  cont rol, interms o f the par ame t er $ \l am bda$, t he MP level a nd  the normof  th e MP s o l ution.
Respect to the second s o lution,  we  impo se t he condit ion s ($F_ 2$) and ($ F_3$)on $f $,  wh i c h wid e l ykno wn  when appl y i ngthe s ub - an d super -solution method i n  pr oblems like ( \[P \])w i th  $s = 1$ .  He re wes h ow that this id ea still r em a in s hold byd efi ni ng prop erly su b- an d  super- solutions  in our n on loca l con text, it i s when $ 0<s<1$.
T he do c um ent i s o rganiz ed  as  foll ows: i n  Se ction  2 weof fer abrief  r eview of  the fractional spacesof Sob olevinthe conte xto f o ur proble m an d remember  so meusefu l r e sults . In Se cti o n 3 w e lo o k for the fi rst s ol ution, whil e i n S ectio n 3 we fin d th e second solution ,  which ends th e pr o o f o f T h eore m\[main-theorem 0\] 
F u nctional  f ramework an d prelim in a ries{#sect ion2}======= = = == = ====== ==== === ========= === =In this  s ec t ion, w e of fe r a
0\] Let_$f\colon \mathbb{R}_\to [0,\infty)$ be a_continuous function_verifying_$(F_1)-(F_3)$. Then,_there_exists $\bar{\lambda}>0$ such_that for $\lambda>\bar{\lambda}$_the problem $(P_{\lambda})$ admits_two nonnegative solutions_$u_{\lambda},_v_{\lambda} \in X^s_0(\Omega)$. Moreover, $0\le u_\lambda < v_{\lambda}\le 1$.

The main ideas behind of the_proof_relies on_known_arguments_for solving this type of_problems. However, this issue is_non-trivial, by_which we need to treat the problema under_an_appropriate approach that_allows to apply such arguments and, in this way,_to save several technical difficulties that_arise in the_nonlocal_case.

Specifically,_we obtain the first_solution $u _{\lambda}$ by truncating the_nonlinearity and taking $\lambda$ large enough,_where we have assumed only the local_condition at zero ($F_1$). The behavior_of the norms, according to_the parameter_$\lambda $ of the possible_solutions, is based_on the_De Giorgi-Nash-Moser theory,_precisely on Moser’s iterative scheme. Such_procedure was introduced_in the mid 1950s and early_1960s,_we refer to_[@DeGiorgi;_@Moser]._An important_fact in the_proof_is that_the_functional energy associated with the truncated_problem_has the Mountain Pass (MP) geometry. Thus,_we can control, in_terms_of the parameter $\lambda$,_the MP level and the_norm of the MP solution.

Respect to_the second_solution, we_impose the conditions ($F_2$) and ($F_3$) on $f$, which widely known_when applying the sub- and super-solution_method in problems like_(\[P\]) with_$s=1$._Here we show_that_this idea_still remains hold by defining properly sub-_and super-solutions_in our nonlocal context, it is_when $0<s<1$.

The document is_organized_as follows: in Section 2 we_offer a brief review of the_fractional spaces of Sobolev in_the_context_of our problem and remember_some useful results. In Section 3_we look for_the first solution, while in Section 3_we_find the second solution, which ends_the_proof of Theorem \[main-theorem0\]

Functional framework and_preliminaries_{#section2}
======================================

In_this section, we offer a