$ hadronisation corrections might not have made it past early childhood). Rather, various theoretical objections ([@NasonSeymour]) and the gradual appearance of new data, especially for the broadenings, forced people to refine their ideas.

[0.42]{}

Among the developments was the realisation that to control the normalisation of the $c_{\mathcal{V}}$ it is necessary to take into account the decay of the massive, virtual, gluon (the reason for the two thrust results in fig. \[fig:contnaive\] was the existence of two different conventions for dealing with the undecayed massive gluon) [@MilanFactor]. It was also realised that it is insufficient to consider a lone ‘non-perturbative’ gluon, but rather that such a gluon must be taken in the context of the full structure of soft and collinear perturbative gluon radiation [@ResummedNP]. Another discovery was that hadron-masses can be associated with universality breaking $1/Q$ power corrections in certain definitions of observables [@SalamWicke] and when testing the universality picture all observables should be measured in an appropriate common ‘hadron-mass’ scheme.

Results incorporating these theoretical developments are shown in figure \[fig:cont2002\]. As well as ${e^{+}e^{-}}$ mean event shapes we also include recent results using resummed DIS event shapes [@DasguptaSalam], fitted to H1 distributions [@H1dist]. The agreement between observables, even in different processes, is remarkable, especially compared to fig. \[fig:contnaive\], and a strong confirmation of the universality hypothesis.[^2]

This is not to say that the field has reached maturity. In the above fits the approximation has been made that non-perturbative corrections just shift the perturbative distribution [@DokWebShift], however there exists a considerable amount of recent work which examines the problem with the more sophisticated ‘shape-functions’ approach [@ShapeFunctions] in particular in the context of the Dressed Gluon Exponentiation approximation [@DGE]. An important point also is that all the detailed experimental tests so far are for 2-jet event shapes, where there exists a solid theoretical justification based on the Feynman tube model [@FeynmanTube], longitudinal boost invariance. It will be of interest to see what happens in multi-jet tests of $1/Q$ hadronisation corrections where one introduces both non-trivial geometry and the presence of gluons in
$ hadronisation corrections might not have made it past early childhood). Rather, various theoretical protest ([ @NasonSeymour ]) and the gradual appearance of newfangled data, especially for the broadenings, impel people to refine their estimate. 

 [ 0.42 ] { } 

 Among the development was the realization that to control the normalisation of the $ c_{\mathcal{V}}$ it is necessary to aim into account the decay of the massive, virtual, gluon (the cause for the two drive results in fig.   \[fig: contnaive\ ] was the existence of two different conventions for dealing with the undecayed massive gluon) [ @MilanFactor ]. It was besides realised that it is insufficient to consider a lone ‘ non - perturbative ’ gluon, but quite that such a gluon must be taken in the context of the full social organization of soft and collinear perturbative gluon radiotherapy [ @ResummedNP ]. Another discovery was that hadron - masses can be consort with universality breaking $ 1 / Q$ power corrections in sealed definitions of observables [ @SalamWicke ] and when testing the universality picture all observables should be measured in an appropriate common ‘ hadron - mass ’ scheme. 

 Results incorporating these theoretical developments are shown in figure   \[fig: cont2002\ ]. As well as $ { e^{+}e^{-}}$ mean event shapes we also admit late results using resummed DIS event human body [ @DasguptaSalam ], fitted to H1 distributions [ @H1dist ]. The agreement between observables, even in different process, is noteworthy, especially compared to fig.   \[fig: contnaive\ ], and a firm confirmation of the universality hypothesis.[^2 ] 

 This is not to say that the field has reached maturity. In the above meet the approximation has been made that non - perturbative corrections just shift the perturbative distribution [ @DokWebShift ], however there exists a considerable sum of recent work which examines the problem with the more sophisticated ‘ form - functions ’ approach [ @ShapeFunctions ] in particular in the context of the Dressed Gluon Exponentiation approximation [ @DGE ]. An important point also is that all the detailed experimental tests indeed far are for 2 - jet consequence shapes, where there exists a solid theoretical justification based on the Feynman tube exemplar [ @FeynmanTube ], longitudinal boost invariability. It will be of interest to see what happen in multi - jet tests of $ 1 / Q$ hadronisation correction where one introduces both non - superficial geometry and the presence of gluons in
$ hafronisation corrections oight not have made it past sarly chkldhood). Rather, various theorxticql obhections ([@NasonSeymour]) xnd the ggadual appearence of new data, especially fod the uroadenings, forged people do refine theis kdzas.

[0.42]{}

Among the developments was the rewlisatipn that to contrjl tnq nodmalisation of the $c_{\mathcal{V}}$ it is necessery to take intp account the decay of the masdive, virtual, gluon (the reason for rhe two thrurt results in fig. \[fig:cohtnaive\] was the existence of twu difyerent convguriojv for dealiig witr the undecanvd masshve glupn) [@MilanFactor]. It waw also realised that mt is insufficient tj consides c lone ‘non-perturbativw’ tluon, but ratfwr ghau snch a gluln just be taien in the xontext of the full segicture of sort and cjllinear perturbative gluon radiation [@RtsummsdNP]. Another discovery qas that hadron-masses can be afsociated with universality breaking $1/Q$ power corractiois in ccrtakb fefinitions of observables [@SalamWicke] and wheg ttstpng the universallty picture all obxegvsfles should bg measuxsd in an appropriate common ‘hadrin-mass’ screme.

Tesults incorporating these theoretical eevelopments are skown in figuxe \[fig:cpnt2002\]. Ax well as ${e^{+}e^{-}}$ mean event shales we also include ddcent results uskng rasummed DIS event shapes [@DwsguptaSaoam], yitted tu H1 cistrifutions [@H1dlst]. Tma agreement betweej obsgrvablas, even in different processes, is remarkauke, especialli cmmpdred to yig. \[fig:gontnaive\], and a strong confirkation jf thd universamity hy'othesis.[^2]

This is not to saf that the fixld has rqachwd mqturity. Kn the above fots the aipxoximatiob has been made thet nuh-perturbative cirrtcrions just shigt ghe pvrtnrbatyee distributhon [@AokDrbShiwt], however bhefe ecists a considerable amohnt of recent work wmich examunes the problem with the more sophistifated ‘shepe-funvtijns’ approach [@ShapeFunctions] in particulwr ln the contexe of the Dressed Gluon Exponentiation approximation [@DGE]. An important poinr also is that all jhe detailed eeperimqntal tesds so far are for 2-jer event shapes, whtre there exists a solis theoseticwl justification based on the Feynman tube model [@FeynmanTube], longitudinal boost invariance. Jt woll bv oy iuterest to dxe what happens im multi-jet tests of $1/Q$ hadronisavion correwtnons where one introduces botn von-trivial geumetry and the presence kf gluonx in
$ hadronisation corrections might not have made early Rather, various objections ([@NasonSeymour]) and data, for the broadenings, people to refine ideas. [0.42]{} Among the developments was realisation that to control the normalisation of the $c_{\mathcal{V}}$ it is necessary to into account the decay of the massive, virtual, gluon (the reason for the thrust in \[fig:contnaive\] the existence of two different conventions for dealing with the undecayed massive gluon) [@MilanFactor]. It was realised that it is insufficient to consider a ‘non-perturbative’ gluon, but rather such a gluon must be in context of full of and collinear perturbative radiation [@ResummedNP]. Another discovery was that hadron-masses can be associated with universality breaking $1/Q$ power corrections in definitions of and when the picture observables should be an appropriate common ‘hadron-mass’ scheme. Results developments are shown in figure \[fig:cont2002\]. As well ${e^{+}e^{-}}$ mean shapes we also include recent results resummed DIS event shapes [@DasguptaSalam], fitted to H1 [@H1dist]. The agreement between observables, even in different processes, is remarkable, especially compared to fig. a strong confirmation of universality hypothesis.[^2] This not say the has reached In the above fits the approximation has been made that non-perturbative just shift the perturbative distribution [@DokWebShift], however there exists a of work which examines problem with the more ‘shape-functions’ [@ShapeFunctions] in particular in of Dressed [@DGE]. important also is that all detailed experimental tests so far for 2-jet event shapes, theoretical justification based on the Feynman tube model longitudinal boost invariance. It will be of to see what happens in multi-jet tests of $1/Q$ hadronisation corrections where introduces both and the presence of gluons in
$ hadronisation corrections mIght not havE made It pAst EaRly cHildHood). Rather, variOUs thEoretical objections ([@NasOnSeyMoUR]) and THe GraduAl appeaRAnCE Of nEw DaTa, eSpECiAlly fOr tHe broadEnings, forcEd pEoPle to refine tHEiR ideas.

[0.42]{}

AmonG thE developmentS waS the reAlIsaTIon thAt tO contRol the NOrmaliSation of tHe $C_{\MathcaL{v}}$ it is neCESsAry tO take into account tHE dECay of the massivE, virtuAl, GLuON (The ReaSon for the tWo ThrusT Results IN fIG. \[FIg:cONtnaive\] was the Existence of TWo dIffereNt ConVEntionS for dEaLIng With the undeCayeD massive gLuon) [@MiLAnFactoR]. it was alSo realIseD thAt it IS iNsUffIcIEnt TO cOnsIDer A lone ‘non-PeRtUrbatIve’ gLUON, But rAthEr thAt sucH a gluon must be TakEn in THe cOntexT of thE fulL sTructUre of sOft anD cOllinear perturbAtivE gluon radIatIoN [@ReSuMmedNp]. anotheR diScoVery was That hadROn-mAsSES CaN be associated with uNiVERsAlity breAking $1/Q$ POwEr COrrectioNs In cErtaIN DefinItioNS oF observaBles [@SaLAmwiCke] and wHeN testiNg The UniVersaLIty pIcture All obserVableS Should be measurED in an appropriATe COMmON ‘hadRon-Mass’ scheme.

REsulTS incOrpoRAtIng THese tHeoreTiCAl DEvelopments are shown In Figure \[Fig:coNt2002\]. As well as ${e^{+}e^{-}}$ mEan event shAPES we also iNcluDE rECent results usiNg resUmmed DIS evENt shapes [@dasguPtaSalam], Fitted to H1 DIStributiOns [@h1diSt]. THe aGREeMent between obSERvabLeS, even in DifFerent pRocEssEs, iS reMaRkable, espEcially cOmPaReD tO fiG. \[fig:cONtnaive\], aNd A stRoNg cOnfirMAtion oF the uNiveRsAlITy hYpothesIS.[^2]

THIS is nOt To Say tHat ThE fielD has REacHed matuRity. In the AboVE fitS tHe ApproxiMation has been MaDe that non-pErTurBative CORrectionS just shift the perturbatiVE distriButIon [@DoKWebshift], howeVer There eXisTS a consIderabLe amoUnT of RECent wORK wHicH eXamines the PROblEm witH tHe moRe sophiSticated ‘shape-functIOns’ Approach [@ShapefunCtioNS] In ParTIcULar In THe cONText of the DresseD Gluon ExpoNeNTiAtion approXImaTiOn [@DGE]. An ImportaNt poiNT also is That all thE detailed ExPeriMENtaL tests so faR are for 2-jEt event shAPes, whERe There ExiSts a soLiD thEoretIcal juSTifIcatiOn baseD oN the FeYnman TuBe model [@FEynmanTube], longitudinal bOost inVariaNce. it will be oF inTEreSt to see whAt haPpens in mulTi-jEt tEsts oF $1/Q$ hADroniSatiON cOrrECtionS wheRE one introDUcEs bOTH nOn-trivial geOMETry And thE prESence oF gluOns in
$ hadronisation correction s might no t hav e m ade  i t pa st e arly childhood ) . Ra ther, various theoreti cal o bj e ctio n s([@Na sonSeym o ur ] )  an dth e g ra d ua l app ear ance of  new data,  es pe cially for t h ebroadening s,forced peopl e t o refi ne  th e ir id eas .

[0 .42]{} 
Among  the deve lo p mentsw as ther e al isat ion that to contr o lt he normalisati on ofth e  $ c _ {\m ath cal{V}}$ i tis ne c essaryt ot a k e i n to account th e decay oft hemassiv e,  vi r tual,gluon  ( t hereason forthetwo thrus t resu l ts in f i g. \[fi g:cont nai ve\ ] wa s  t he  ex is t enc e  o f t w o d ifferent  c on venti onsf o r deal ing  wit h the  undecayed ma ssi ve g l uon ) [@M ilanF acto r] . Itwas al so re al ised that it is  ins ufficient  to  c ons id er al one ‘n on- per turbati ve’ glu o n,bu t r at her that such a gl uo n mu st be ta ken in th ec ontext o fthe  ful l struc ture of  soft an d coll i ne ar  pertur ba tive g lu onrad iatio n  [@R esumme dNP]. An other discovery wast hat hadron-ma s se s ca n  beass ociated wit h un i vers alit y  b rea k ing $ 1/Q$po w er corrections in cert ai n defi nitio ns of observa bles [@Sal a m W icke] an d wh e nt esting the uni versa lity pictu r e all ob serva bles sho uld be me a s ured inanapp rop ria t e  c ommon ‘hadron - m ass’  s cheme.
Re sults i nco rpo rat ing  t hese theo reticalde ve lo pm ent s are shown in  f igu re  \[ fig:c o nt2002 \]. A s we ll  a s  ${ e^{+}e^ { -} } $  mea nev entsha pe s wealso inc lude re cent resu lts usin gre summedDIS event sha pe s [@Dasgup ta Sal am], f i t ted to H 1 distributions [@H1dis t ]. Theagr eemen t be tween obs erv ables,  ev e n in d iffere nt pr oc ess e s , isr e ma rka bl e, especia l l y c ompar ed  tofig. \[ fig:contnaive\], a n d a  strong confi rma tion o fthe un i ver sa l ity h ypothesis.[^2]
This is n ot to  say thatt hefi eld has  reache d mat u rity. I n the abo ve fits t he  app r o xim ation hasbeen mad e that no n -pert u rb ative  co rrecti on s j ust s hift t h e p ertur bative  d istrib ution  [ @DokWebS hift], however there ex ists a  cons ide rable amo unt ofrecent wo rk w hich exami nes  th e pro ble m  with  the mo res ophis tica t ed ‘shape - fu nct i o ns ’ approach[ @ S hap eFunc tio n s] inpart icular in the con t ext of the Dre ssed G luo n E x pone nt iation approxi mat io n [@DGE].An  importantpoint al so is th at all  the d etailed e xp e riment al t est s so farare  f o r 2-jet  e ve n t shap es,wh ere th ere ex i stsa solid theoretica l jus t i ficat i onbased  o n the F e ynma n tube mod el [@Feynma nTube] , lo ngitu dinal b oo st inv ari an ce. It wil l  be of in teres t to se ewhat  ha ppensin m u l ti-je t te st s o f $1/Q$ h a d ro n is at i oncorr ectio ns  whe re one in t roducesbot h  non-tr iv ial g eometr y  a n d  the prese nce  of g l u ons in
$ hadronisation_corrections might_not have made it_past early_childhood)._Rather, various_theoretical_objections ([@NasonSeymour]) and_the gradual appearance_of new data, especially_for the broadenings,_forced_people to refine their ideas.

[0.42]{}

Among the developments was the realisation that to control the_normalisation_of the_$c_{\mathcal{V}}$_it_is necessary to take into_account the decay of the_massive, virtual,_gluon (the reason for the two thrust results_in_fig. \[fig:contnaive\] was the_existence of two different conventions for dealing with the_undecayed massive gluon) [@MilanFactor]. It was_also realised that_it_is_insufficient to consider a_lone ‘non-perturbative’ gluon, but rather that_such a gluon must be taken_in the context of the full structure_of soft and collinear perturbative gluon_radiation [@ResummedNP]. Another discovery was_that hadron-masses_can be associated with universality_breaking $1/Q$ power_corrections in_certain definitions of_observables [@SalamWicke] and when testing the_universality picture all_observables should be measured in an_appropriate_common ‘hadron-mass’ scheme.

Results_incorporating_these_theoretical developments_are shown in_figure \[fig:cont2002\]._As well_as_${e^{+}e^{-}}$ mean event shapes we also_include_recent results using resummed DIS event shapes_[@DasguptaSalam], fitted to H1_distributions_[@H1dist]. The agreement between_observables, even in different processes,_is remarkable, especially compared to fig. \[fig:contnaive\],_and a_strong confirmation_of the universality hypothesis.[^2]

This is not to say that the field_has reached maturity. In the above_fits the approximation has_been made_that_non-perturbative corrections just_shift_the perturbative_distribution [@DokWebShift], however there exists a considerable_amount of_recent work which examines the problem_with the more sophisticated_‘shape-functions’_approach [@ShapeFunctions] in particular in the_context of the Dressed Gluon Exponentiation_approximation [@DGE]. An important point_also_is_that all the detailed experimental_tests so far are for 2-jet_event shapes, where_there exists a solid theoretical justification based_on_the Feynman tube model [@FeynmanTube], longitudinal_boost_invariance. It will be of interest_to_see_what happens in multi-jet tests_of $1/Q$ hadronisation corrections where one_introduces both non-trivial geometry and the presence of gluons_in