 2$, provided the intersection is proper. By Kleiman’s transversality of a general translate this is true for a general translate of $\sigma^k_V$ in $\mathbf G(d-7,|H|)$, that is, for a general choice of $\Lambda$ (or equivalently, of $V$). Hence $W^1(\Gamma)$ is finite.

The theorem above fails for rational septic scrolls in $\mathbf P^8$ containing sections of degree $d\leq 2$, that is, for the scrolls $S_{a,7-a}$, where $a\neq 3$.

We turn to the smooth residual rational curve $Q\subseteq \GG(1,5)$ defined by (\[linint\]). Let $$R_Q \subseteq \PP^5$$ be the quartic scroll whose rulings are parametrized by the curve $Q$.

$R_Q$ is a non-degenerate smooth rational normal scroll in $\mathbf P^5$.

First, observe that $R_Q$ cannot be a cone. Let us assume $R_Q$ is a cone of vertex $v\in \PP^5$. Then $\langle Q \rangle\cong \PP^4\subseteq \mathbf G(1,5)$ parametrizes the lines passing through $v$. This is a contradiction because $\langle Q \rangle \subseteq \langle \Gamma \rangle \cdot \mathbf G(1,5) = C$. Now assume that $R_Q$ is contained in a hyperplane $H\subseteq \PP^5$. Then $Q$ is contained in the Grassmannian $\GG_H:=\GG(1,H)\subseteq \GG(1,5)$ of lines of $H$. Since $K_{\GG_H}=\OO_{\GG_H}(-5)$, we observe that, by adjunction, the curvilinear sections of $\GG_H$ are curves of arithmetic genus $1$. Because of this fact and since $\mbox{deg}(\GG_H)=5$, it follows that $$\langle Q \rangle \cdot \GG_H = Q + L \subseteq C,$$ where $L$ is a bisecant line to $Q$. But the only line components in $C$ are $L_1, L_2, L_3$ and none of them is bisecant to $Q$. Via Proposition \[rulcurve\], the same argument shows that the
2 $, provided the intersection is proper. By Kleiman ’s transversality of a general translate this is true for a cosmopolitan translate of $ \sigma^k_V$ in $ \mathbf G(d-7,|H|)$, that is, for a cosmopolitan option of $ \Lambda$ (or equivalently, of $ V$). Hence $ W^1(\Gamma)$ is finite. 

 The theorem above fails for rational septic scroll in $ \mathbf P^8 $ containing sections of academic degree $ d\leq 2 $, that is, for the scrolls $ S_{a,7 - a}$, where $ a\neq 3$. 

 We turn to the smooth residual intellectual curvature $ Q\subseteq \GG(1,5)$ defined by (\[linint\ ]). lease $ $ R_Q \subseteq \PP^5$$ be the quartic scroll whose rulings are parametrized by the curvature $ Q$. 

 $ R_Q$ is a non - degenerate smooth rational normal scroll in $ \mathbf P^5$. 

 First, detect that $ R_Q$ cannot be a cone. Let us assume $ R_Q$ is a cone of vertex $ v\in \PP^5$. Then $ \langle Q \rangle\cong \PP^4\subseteq \mathbf G(1,5)$ parametrizes the lines pass through $ v$. This is a contradiction because $ \langle Q \rangle \subseteq \langle \Gamma \rangle \cdot \mathbf G(1,5) = C$. Now assume that $ R_Q$ is contained in a hyperplane $ H\subseteq \PP^5$. Then $ Q$ is contained in the Grassmannian $ \GG_H:=\GG(1,H)\subseteq \GG(1,5)$ of lineage of $ H$. Since $ K_{\GG_H}=\OO_{\GG_H}(-5)$, we observe that, by adjunction, the curvilinear sections of $ \GG_H$ are curves of arithmetic genus $ 1$. Because of this fact and since $ \mbox{deg}(\GG_H)=5 $, it follow that $ $ \langle Q \rangle \cdot \GG_H = Q + L \subseteq C,$$ where $ L$ is a bisecant line to $ Q$. But the only line components in $ C$ are $ L_1, L_2, L_3 $ and none of them is bisecant to $ Q$. Via Proposition \[rulcurve\ ], the like controversy shows that the
 2$, pgovided the intersection is proper. By Kleiman’s transbersalith of a general translate thid us trye for a general transuate of $\spgma^k_V$ in $\matibf G(d-7,|H|)$, that is, hkr a gekzral dmoice if $\Lambda$ (or eauivalentlf, of $V$). Hence $W^1(\Caomc)$ is finite.

The theorem above fails fjr ratipnwl septic scrojls pn $\matgbf P^8$ containing sections of degres $d\leq 2$, that is, for yhe scrolls $S_{a,7-a}$, where $a\neq 3$.

We hurn to the smooth residual rqtiogql curve $Q\sucseteq \GG(1,5)$ defined by (\[ljnint\]). Let $$R_Q \subseteq \PP^5$$ be the quarcic scroll qhise tulings are 'aramenrized by the curve $Q$.

$S_Q$ is a non-degenerate smmoty rational normal scrmll in $\mathbf P^5$.

Firft, observa chat $R_Q$ cannot be a cinw. Let us dssuow $R_D$ ia e ckne of vectex $v\in \PP^5$. Then $\langlw Q \rangle\cong \PP^4\sunsqnrq \mathbf G(1,5)$ larameeryzes the lines passing through $v$. This iv a contradiction because $\oangle Q \rangle \subsejeq \langle \Gamma \rangle \cdot \mathbf G(1,5) = C$. Now assume that $R_Q$ is ckvtankcd iv a hyperplane $H\subseteq \PP^5$. Then $Q$ is contained yh uhe Grassmannian $\NG_H:=\GG(1,H)\subseteq \GG(1,5)$ pf loges of $H$. Sincg $K_{\GG_H}=\OO_{\GG_G}(-5)$, we observe that, hy adjugctiob, the curdilimear sections of $\GG_H$ are cueves of aritkmeric genus $1$. Because of this faet and sincr $\mbox{deg}(\GG_H)=5$, it follows thaf $$\langle Q \gangle \cdkg \GG_H = Q + L \subsdtea W,$$ where $L$ is a bisecant lige to $Q$. Bnt thz only lkne vomponqnts in $C$ wre $L_1, L_2, L_3$ and none of thfm is bhsecant to $Q$. Via Proposition \[rulcurve\], the same argument svowv that tke
2$, provided the intersection is proper. By of general translate is true for in G(d-7,|H|)$, that is, a general choice $\Lambda$ (or equivalently, of $V$). Hence is finite. The theorem above fails for rational septic scrolls in $\mathbf P^8$ sections of degree $d\leq 2$, that is, for the scrolls $S_{a,7-a}$, where $a\neq We to smooth rational curve $Q\subseteq \GG(1,5)$ defined by (\[linint\]). Let $$R_Q \subseteq \PP^5$$ be the quartic scroll whose are parametrized by the curve $Q$. $R_Q$ is non-degenerate smooth rational normal in $\mathbf P^5$. First, observe $R_Q$ be a Let assume is a cone vertex $v\in \PP^5$. Then $\langle Q \rangle\cong \PP^4\subseteq \mathbf G(1,5)$ parametrizes the lines passing through $v$. This a contradiction Q \rangle \langle \rangle \mathbf G(1,5) = assume that $R_Q$ is contained in \PP^5$. Then $Q$ is contained in the Grassmannian \GG(1,5)$ of of $H$. Since $K_{\GG_H}=\OO_{\GG_H}(-5)$, we observe by adjunction, the curvilinear sections of $\GG_H$ are of arithmetic genus $1$. Because of this fact and since $\mbox{deg}(\GG_H)=5$, it follows that $$\langle \cdot \GG_H = Q L \subseteq C,$$ $L$ a line $Q$. But only line components in $C$ are $L_1, L_2, L_3$ and none them is bisecant to $Q$. Via Proposition \[rulcurve\], the same that
 2$, provided the intersection is Proper. By KlEiman’S trAnsVeRsalIty oF a general transLAte tHis is true for a general trAnslaTe OF $\sigMA^k_v$ in $\maThbf G(d-7,|H|)$, THaT IS, foR a GeNerAl CHoIce of $\lamBda$ (or eqUivalently, Of $V$). heNce $W^1(\Gamma)$ is fINiTe.

The theorEm aBove fails for RatIonal sEpTic SCrollS in $\MathbF P^8$ contAIning sEctions of DeGRee $d\leQ 2$, That is, fOR ThE scrOlls $S_{a,7-a}$, where $a\neq 3$.

WE TuRN to the smooth reSidual RaTIoNAL cuRve $q\subseteq \Gg(1,5)$ dEfineD By (\[lininT\]). leT $$r_q \SubSEteq \PP^5$$ be the quArtic scroll WHosE rulinGs Are PArametRized By THe cUrve $Q$.

$R_Q$ is a nOn-deGenerate sMooth rATional nORmal scrOll in $\mAthBf P^5$.

firsT, ObSeRve ThAT $R_Q$ CAnNot BE a cOne. Let us AsSuMe $R_Q$ iS a coNE OF VertEx $v\In \PP^5$. then $\lAngle Q \rangle\cOng \pP^4\suBSetEq \matHbf G(1,5)$ pAramEtRizes The linEs pasSiNg through $v$. This iS a coNtradictiOn bEcAusE $\lAngle q \Rangle \SubSetEq \langlE \Gamma \rANglE \cDOT \MaThbf G(1,5) = C$. Now assume thaT $R_q$ IS cOntained In a hypERpLaNE $H\subsetEq \pP^5$. THen $Q$ IS ContaIned IN tHe GrassmAnnian $\gg_H:=\gG(1,h)\subsetEq \gG(1,5)$ of liNeS of $h$. SiNce $K_{\Gg_h}=\OO_{\Gg_H}(-5)$, we obServe thaT, by adJUnction, the curvILinear sectionS Of $\gg_h$ aRE curVes Of arithmetiC genUS $1$. BecAuse OF tHis FAct anD sincE $\mBOx{DEg}(\GG_H)=5$, it follows that $$\lAnGle Q \raNgle \cDot \GG_H = Q + L \subseTeq C,$$ where $L$ IS A Bisecant Line TO $Q$. bUt the only line cOmponEnts in $C$ are $l_1, l_2, L_3$ and nonE of thEm is biseCant to $Q$. ViA pRopositiOn \[rUlcUrvE\], thE SAmE argument showS THat tHe
 2$, provided the intersec tion is pr oper.  By  Kl ei man’ s tr ansversality o f  a g eneral translate thisis tr ue fora  g enera l trans l at e of$\ si gma ^k _ V$  in $ \ma thbf G( d-7,|H|)$,  th at  is, for a g e ne ral choice  of  $\Lambda$ ( orequiva le ntl y , of$V$ ). He nce $W ^ 1(\Gam ma)$ is f in i te.

T h e theor e m  a bove  fails for ration a ls eptic scrollsin $\m at h bf P ^8$  co ntaining s ec tions of degr e e$ d \ leq 2$, that is,for the scr o lls  $S_{a ,7 -a} $ , wher e $a\ ne q  3$ .

We turnto t he smooth  resid u al rati o nal cur ve $Q\ sub set eq \ G G( 1, 5)$  d e fin e dby( \[l inint\]) .Le t $$R _Q \ s u b s eteq  \P P^5$ $ bethe quartic s cro ll w h ose  ruli ngs a re p ar ametr ized b y the  c urve $Q$.

$R_Q $ is  a non-de gen er ate  s mooth ration alnor mal scr oll in$ \ma th b f P^ 5$.

First, observ et h at  $R_Q$ c annotb eac one. Let  u s a ssum e $R_Q$  isa  c one of v ertex$ v\ in  \PP^5$ .Then $ \l ang leQ \ra n gle\ cong \ PP^4\sub seteq \mathbf G(1,5) $  parametrizes th e li n es p ass ing through  $v$ .  Thi s is acon t radic tionbe c au s e $\langle Q \rangl e\subse teq \ langle \Gamma  \rangle \ c d o t \mathb f G( 1 ,5 )  = C$. Now ass ume t hat $R_Q$i s contai ned i n a hype rplane $H \ s ubseteq\PP ^5$ . T hen $ Q$  is contained i n th eGrassma nni an $\GG _H: =\G G(1 ,H) \s ubseteq \ GG(1,5)$  o fli ne s o f $H$ .  Since $ K_ {\G G_ H}= \OO_{ \ GG_H}( -5)$,  weob se r vethat, b y  a d j unct io n,  the  cu rv iline ar s e cti ons of$\GG_H$ a rec urve sof  arithm etic genus $1 $.  Because o fthi s fact a nd since  $\mbox{deg}(\GG_H)=5$, it foll ows  that  $$\ langle Q\ra ngle \ cdo t  \GG_H  = Q +  L \s ub set e q  C,$$ w he re$L $ is a bis e c ant  line  t o $Q $. Butthe only line comp o nen ts in $C$ are  $L _1,L _ 2,  L_ 3 $a ndno n e o f them is bisecan t to $Q$.Vi a  P roposition \[r ul curve\] , the s ame a r gumentshows tha t the
 2$,_provided the_intersection is proper. By_Kleiman’s transversality_of_a general_translate_this is true_for a general_translate of $\sigma^k_V$ in_$\mathbf G(d-7,|H|)$, that_is,_for a general choice of $\Lambda$ (or equivalently, of $V$). Hence $W^1(\Gamma)$ is finite.

The_theorem_above fails_for_rational_septic scrolls in $\mathbf P^8$_containing sections of degree $d\leq_2$, that_is, for the scrolls $S_{a,7-a}$, where $a\neq 3$.

We_turn_to the smooth_residual rational curve $Q\subseteq \GG(1,5)$ defined by (\[linint\]). Let_$$R_Q \subseteq \PP^5$$ be the quartic_scroll whose rulings_are_parametrized_by the curve $Q$.

$R_Q$_is a non-degenerate smooth rational normal_scroll in $\mathbf P^5$.

First, observe that_$R_Q$ cannot be a cone. Let us_assume $R_Q$ is a cone of_vertex $v\in \PP^5$. Then $\langle_Q \rangle\cong_\PP^4\subseteq \mathbf G(1,5)$ parametrizes the_lines passing through_$v$. This_is a contradiction_because $\langle Q \rangle \subseteq \langle_\Gamma \rangle \cdot_\mathbf G(1,5) = C$. Now assume_that_$R_Q$ is contained_in_a_hyperplane $H\subseteq_\PP^5$. Then $Q$_is_contained in_the_Grassmannian $\GG_H:=\GG(1,H)\subseteq \GG(1,5)$ of lines of_$H$._Since $K_{\GG_H}=\OO_{\GG_H}(-5)$, we observe that, by adjunction,_the curvilinear sections of_$\GG_H$_are curves of arithmetic_genus $1$. Because of this_fact and since $\mbox{deg}(\GG_H)=5$, it follows_that $$\langle_Q \rangle_\cdot \GG_H = Q + L \subseteq C,$$ where $L$ is_a bisecant line to $Q$. But_the only line components_in $C$_are_$L_1, L_2, L_3$_and_none of_them is bisecant to $Q$. Via Proposition_\[rulcurve\], the_same argument shows that the