 computing Yukawa couplings as it applies to smooth hypersurfaces in weighted projective spaces. All of the material in this section is quite standard (see e.g. [@GMP] and reviews in [@Ess]). It is included here to make our presentation more self-contained.

Some background on mirror symmetry
----------------------------------

Consider a superconformal Landau-Ginsburg model with superpotential ${\cal Q}$. Take ${\cal Q}$ to be a quasi-homogeneous polynomial. An argument due to Greene, Vafa and Warner [@GVW], Martinec [@Mart] and Witten [@Wit2] shows that this theory is an “analytic continuation” to negative Kähler class of a $\sigma$-model with Calabi-Yau manifold as a target space. This manifold can be described as a codimension one variety $${\cal W} = \{ x, {\cal Q}(x) = 0 \}$$ in a weighted projective space.\
Truly marginal operators with $U(1)$ charge equal to $+1$ $(
-1 )$ in the superconformal theory correspond to complex structure (Kähler) modes of the Calabi-Yau theory. We will be also considering “extended Kähler moduli spaces” $H^{p}(X,\Lambda^{p}T^{*})$ and “extended complex structure moduli spaces” $H^{p}(X, \Lambda^{p}T)$. Following Witten [@Wit], the couplings involving elements of $H^{p}(X,
\Lambda^{p}T^{*})$ will be called [**A**]{}-model couplings, while couplings involving elements of $H^{p}(X,
\Lambda^{p}T)$ – [**B**]{}-model couplings.\
Now consider the action of the maximal group of scaling symmetries $G$ on both Landau-Ginsburg and Calabi-Yau models for ${\cal Q}$ of Fermat type. It is well known (see, e.g. review [@GP] and references therein) that orbifolding the LG theory by G simply simply changes the sign of one of the $U(1)$ charges and gives a theory isomorphic to the original one. For a CY model, dividing by G means taking the orbifold of the target space. The unique connection with a LG model now leads to the central result of the mirror symmetry, namely, to the prediction that the two resulting quantum $\sigma$-models are isomorphic (even though they have different tree-level actions, since their target
computing Yukawa couplings as it applies to smooth hypersurfaces in burden projective space. All of the material in this incision is quite standard (witness e.g. [ @GMP ] and reviews in [ @Ess ]). It is admit here to have our presentation more self - incorporate. 

 Some background on mirror symmetry 
 ---------------------------------- 

 regard a superconformal Landau - Ginsburg model with superpotential $ { \cal Q}$. Take $ { \cal Q}$ to be a quasi - homogeneous polynomial. An argumentation due to Greene, Vafa and Warner [ @GVW ], Martinec [ @Mart ] and Witten [ @Wit2 ] indicate that this theory is an “ analytic continuation ” to negative Kähler class of a $ \sigma$-model with Calabi - Yau manifold as a prey space. This manifold can be described as a codimension one kind $ $ { \cal W } = \ { x, { \cal Q}(x) = 0 \}$$ in a weighted projective space.\ 
 Truly marginal operators with $ U(1)$ care equal to $ +1 $ $ (
 -1) $ in the superconformal theory correspond to complex structure (Kähler) modes of the Calabi - Yau hypothesis. We will be also considering “ extended Kähler moduli spaces ” $ H^{p}(X,\Lambda^{p}T^{*})$ and “ extended complex social organization modulus spaces ” $ H^{p}(X, \Lambda^{p}T)$. Following Witten [ @Wit ], the couplings involving elements of $ H^{p}(X, 
 \Lambda^{p}T^{*})$ will be called [ * * A**]{}-model couplings, while couplings involving component of $ H^{p}(X, 
 \Lambda^{p}T)$ – [ * * B**]{}-model couplings.\ 
 Now consider the legal action of the maximal group of scaling symmetries $ G$ on both Landau - Ginsburg and Calabi - Yau models for $ { \cal Q}$ of Fermat type. It is well known (see, for example review [ @GP ] and reference therein) that orbifolding the LG theory by G simply plainly changes the sign of one of the $ U(1)$ charges and gives a theory isomorphic to the original one. For a CY mannequin, dividing by G means taking the orbifold of the target space. The alone connection with a LG exemplar now leads to the central result of the mirror symmetry, namely, to the prediction that the two result quantum $ \sigma$-models are isomorphic (even though they have different tree - degree actions, since their target
 colputing Yukawa couplings as it applies jo smooti hyperaurfaces in weighted projective spacxs. Aol of the material in this rection id quite wtanvard (see e.g. [@GMP] ehd reviccs in [@Css]). Ic ms included herg to make ous presentation murz self-contained.

Some background on miwror sykmftry
----------------------------------

Consider a suptrcjnfodmal Landau-Ginsburg model with supsrpotenuial ${\cal Q}$. Take ${\cak Q}$ to be a quasi-homogeneoks pllynomial. An argumfnt due to Treegw, Vafa and Wxrner [@GVW], Martinec [@Marj] and Witten [@Wit2] shows that this theoxy is an “anqlttif continuatiin” to negative Kähler clasv of a $\xigma$-model witm Calebi-Yqu manifold as a targxt space. This manifojd can be dzscribed as a codimenwiin ong varhety $${\xal W} = \{ e, {\czl Q}(x) = 0 \}$$ mn a weightsd projectice space.\
Truly margimaj operators wifh $U(1)$ crawge equal to $+1$ $(
-1 )$ in the superconformal tveody correspond to complez structure (Kähler) modgs of the Salabi-Yau theory. We will be also considering “extetded Iäflex moduuu dpaces” $H^{p}(X,\Lambda^{p}T^{*})$ and “extended complex strucehrt mpduli spaces” $H^{i}(X, \Lambda^{p}T)$. Followonh Eytten [@Wit], the couplnhga involving elemenhs of $H^{k}(X,
\Lambea^{p}T^{*})$ will be valled [**A**]{}-model couplings, whioe couplings unvolving elements of $H^{p}(X,
\Lambba^{p}T)$ – [**N**]{}-modek couplings.\
Now consider the action of hhe maximzu group of scalivg xykmetries $G$ on both Landau-Gynsburg aid Cakabi-Yau modgls for ${\cal Q}$ of Vermab type. It is well kjown (dea, e.g. reviea [@GP] and references therein) thav orbifolding tve NG theorv by G simply simplr changes the xign of one uf the $U(1)$ cgarges end gives a eheory isomor[jic to the ociginal oge. Fir a CY moddu, dividing by B means tching the orbifold of tme tatgst space. The unndow connection woth a JG mpdqn now leads do tfe zrntrau resulu on tfe morror symmetry, namelf, to the prediction thst the two resultigg quantum $\sibma$-models are isomlrphir (even thoubh jhey have different tree-level adtions, sijce their targee
computing Yukawa couplings as it applies to in projective spaces. of the material standard e.g. [@GMP] and in [@Ess]). It included here to make our presentation self-contained. Some background on mirror symmetry ---------------------------------- Consider a superconformal Landau-Ginsburg model with ${\cal Q}$. Take ${\cal Q}$ to be a quasi-homogeneous polynomial. An argument due Greene, and [@GVW], [@Mart] and Witten [@Wit2] shows that this theory is an “analytic continuation” to negative Kähler class a $\sigma$-model with Calabi-Yau manifold as a target This manifold can be as a codimension one variety W} \{ x, Q}(x) 0 in a weighted space.\ Truly marginal operators with $U(1)$ charge equal to $+1$ $( -1 )$ in the superconformal theory to complex modes of Calabi-Yau We be also considering moduli spaces” $H^{p}(X,\Lambda^{p}T^{*})$ and “extended complex $H^{p}(X, \Lambda^{p}T)$. Following Witten [@Wit], the couplings involving of $H^{p}(X, will be called [**A**]{}-model couplings, while involving elements of $H^{p}(X, \Lambda^{p}T)$ – [**B**]{}-model couplings.\ consider the action of the maximal group of scaling symmetries $G$ on both Landau-Ginsburg and for ${\cal Q}$ of type. It is known e.g. [@GP] references therein) orbifolding the LG theory by G simply simply changes the sign one of the $U(1)$ charges and gives a theory isomorphic original For a CY dividing by G means the of the target space. connection a leads the result of the mirror namely, to the prediction that two resulting quantum $\sigma$-models have different tree-level actions, since their target
 computing Yukawa couplings aS it applies To smoOth HypErSurfAces In weighted projECtivE spaces. All of the materiaL in thIs SEctiON iS quitE standaRD (sEE E.g. [@GmP] AnD reViEWs In [@Ess]). it iS includEd here to maKe oUr Presentation MOrE self-contaIneD.

Some backgroUnd On mirrOr SymMEtry
----------------------------------

COnsIder a SupercONformaL Landau-GiNsBUrg modEL with suPERpOtenTial ${\cal Q}$. Take ${\cal Q}$ tO Be A Quasi-homogeneoUs polyNoMIaL. aN arGumEnt due to GrEeNe, VafA And WarnER [@Gvw], mArtINec [@Mart] and WitTen [@Wit2] shows THat This thEoRy iS An “analYtic cOnTInuAtion” to negaTive kähler claSs of a $\sIGma$-modeL With CalAbi-Yau ManIfoLd as A TaRgEt sPaCE. ThIS mAniFOld Can be desCrIbEd as a CodiMENSIon oNe vArieTy $${\cal w} = \{ x, {\cal Q}(x) = 0 \}$$ in a weiGhtEd prOJecTive sPace.\
TRuly MaRginaL operaTors wItH $U(1)$ charge equal to $+1$ $(
-1 )$ In thE superconForMaL thEoRy corREspond To cOmpLex struCture (KäHLer) MoDES Of The Calabi-Yau theory. we WILl Be also coNsiderINg “ExTEnded KähLeR moDuli SPAces” $H^{P}(X,\LaMBdA^{p}T^{*})$ and “exTended COmPlEx strucTuRe moduLi SpaCes” $h^{p}(X, \LaMBda^{p}t)$. FolloWing WittEn [@Wit], THe couplings invOLving elements OF $H^{P}(x,
\laMBda^{p}t^{*})$ wiLl be called [**A**]{}-ModeL CoupLingS, WhIle COupliNgs inVoLViNG elements of $H^{p}(X,
\LambdA^{p}t)$ – [**B**]{}-modeL coupLings.\
Now consiDer the actiON OF the maxiMal gROuP Of scaling symmeTries $g$ on both LanDAu-GinsbuRg and calabi-YaU models foR ${\CAl Q}$ of FerMat TypE. It Is wELL kNown (see, e.g. reviEW [@gP] anD rEferencEs tHerein) tHat OrbIfoLdiNg The LG theoRy by G simPlY sImPlY chAnges THe sign of OnE of ThE $U(1)$ cHargeS And givEs a thEory IsOmORphIc to the ORiGINal oNe. foR a CY ModEl, DividIng bY g meAns takiNg the orbiFolD Of thE tArGet spacE. The unique conNeCtion with a lG ModEl now lEADs to the cEntral result of the mirror SYmmetry, NamEly, to The pRediction ThaT the twO reSUlting QuantuM $\sigmA$-mOdeLS Are isOMOrPhiC (eVen though tHEY haVe difFeRent Tree-levEl actions, since theiR TarGet
 computing Yukawa coupling s as it ap plies  to  sm oo th h yper surfaces in we i ghte d projective spaces. A ll of  t h e ma t er ial i n thiss ec t i onis  q uit es ta ndard  (s ee e.g.  [@GMP] an d r ev iews in [@Es s ]) . It is in clu ded here tomak e ourpr ese n tatio n m ore s elf-co n tained .

Some b ac k ground on mirr o r  s ymme try
------------- - -- - -------------- ---

C on s id e r  asup erconforma lLanda u -Ginsbu r gm o d elw ith superpote ntial ${\ca l  Q} $. Tak e${\ c al Q}$  to b ea  qu asi-homogen eous  polynomi al. An argumen t  due to  Green e,Vaf a an d  W ar ner  [ @ GVW ] ,Mar t ine c [@Mart ]an d Wit ten[ @ W i t2]sho ws t hat t his theory is  an  “an a lyt ic co ntinu atio n”  to n egativ e Käh le r class of a $\ sigm a$-modelwit hCal ab i-Yau manifo ldasa targe t space .  Th is m a ni fold can be descri be d as  a codim ension on ev ariety $ ${ \ca l W} =  \{ x , {\ c al  Q}(x) =  0 \}$ $  i na weigh te d proj ec tiv e s pace. \ 
Tru ly mar ginal op erato r s with $U(1)$c harge equal t o  $ + 1 $$ (
-1  )$  in the sup erco n form al t h eo ryc orres pondto co m plex structure (Käh le r) mod es of  the Calabi-Y au theory. W e  will be  als o  c o nsidering “ext ended  Kähler mo d uli spac es” $ H^{p}(X, \Lambda^{ p } T^{*})$and  “e xte nde d co mplex structu r e  mod ul i space s”$H^{p}( X,\La mbd a^{ p} T)$. Foll owing Wi tt en  [ @W it] , the coupling sinv ol vin g ele m ents o f $H^ {p}( X, 
\ L amb da^{p}T ^ {* } ) $ wi ll  b e ca lle d[**A* *]{} - mod el coup lings, wh ile coup li ng s invol ving elements  o f $H^{p}(X ,\La mbda^{ p } T)$ – [* *B**]{}-model couplings . \
Now c ons idertheaction of  th e maxi mal groupof sca lingsy mme t r ies $ G $  o n b ot h Landau-G i n sbu rg an dCala bi-Yaumodels for ${\calQ }$of Fermat typ e.It i s we llk no w n ( se e , e . g . review [@GP]and refere nc e stherein) t h ator bifoldi ng theLG th e ory byG simplysimply ch an gest h e s ign of one  of the$U(1)$ ch a rgesa nd  give s a  theor yiso morph ic tot heorigi nal on e.  For a  CY m od el, divi ding by G means takingthe or bifol d o f the tar get spa ce. The u niqu e connecti onwit h a L G m o del n ow l e ad s t o  thecent r al result of  th e mi rror symmet r y ,  na mely,  to the pr edic tion that the two resulting quan tum$ \ sig ma$ - mode ls  are isomorphi c ( ev e n  thoughth ey have dif ferent t re e -leve l acti ons, s ince th e i rt arget
 computing_Yukawa couplings_as it applies to_smooth hypersurfaces_in_weighted projective_spaces._All of the_material in this_section is quite standard_(see e.g. [@GMP]_and_reviews in [@Ess]). It is included here to make our presentation more self-contained.

Some background_on_mirror symmetry
----------------------------------

Consider_a_superconformal_Landau-Ginsburg model with superpotential ${\cal_Q}$. Take ${\cal Q}$ to_be a_quasi-homogeneous polynomial. An argument due to Greene, Vafa_and_Warner [@GVW], Martinec_[@Mart] and Witten [@Wit2] shows that this theory is_an “analytic continuation” to negative Kähler_class of a_$\sigma$-model_with_Calabi-Yau manifold as a_target space. This manifold can be_described as a codimension one variety_$${\cal W} = \{ x, {\cal Q}(x)_= 0 \}$$ in a weighted_projective space.\
Truly marginal operators with_$U(1)$ charge_equal to $+1$ $(
-1 )$_in the superconformal_theory correspond_to complex structure_(Kähler) modes of the Calabi-Yau theory._We will be_also considering “extended Kähler moduli spaces”_$H^{p}(X,\Lambda^{p}T^{*})$_and “extended complex_structure_moduli_spaces” $H^{p}(X,_\Lambda^{p}T)$. Following Witten_[@Wit],_the couplings_involving_elements of $H^{p}(X,
\Lambda^{p}T^{*})$ will be called_[**A**]{}-model_couplings, while couplings involving elements of $H^{p}(X,
\Lambda^{p}T)$_– [**B**]{}-model couplings.\
Now consider_the_action of the maximal_group of scaling symmetries $G$_on both Landau-Ginsburg and Calabi-Yau models_for ${\cal_Q}$ of_Fermat type. It is well known (see, e.g. review [@GP] and_references therein) that orbifolding the LG_theory by G simply_simply changes_the_sign of one_of_the $U(1)$_charges and gives a theory isomorphic to_the original_one. For a CY model, dividing_by G means taking_the_orbifold of the target space. The_unique connection with a LG model_now leads to the central_result_of_the mirror symmetry, namely, to_the prediction that the two resulting_quantum $\sigma$-models are_isomorphic (even though they have different tree-level_actions,_since their target