h s.), the following Hamiltonian was set up $$\label{eqn:H} H=\frac{(\hat{I}_{\pi}+\hat{I}_{\nu})^{2}}{2J_{intr}}+
\frac{(\hat{I}_{\pi}-\hat{I}_{\nu})^{2}}{2J_{intr}}+\frac{1}{2}C\theta^{2},
\label{eq:hamiltonian}$$ in which the restoring force constant $C$ is related to the symmetry energy constant in the semi-empirical mass formula. Using known properties of deformed nuclei: the moment of inertia $J_{intr}$ of the ground-state band, the symmetry energy and the $B(E2;0^{+}_{1}\rightarrow2^{+}_{1}$) transition strength, one can determine both the excitation energy $E_{sc} =\hbar\sqrt{C/J_{intr}}$ and the $B(M1)$ transition strength $$\label{eqn:B} B(M1;0^{+}\rightarrow1^{+})=\frac{3}{16\pi}
\frac{J_{intr}}{\hbar^2}
E_{sc}(g_{p}-g_{n})^{2}~\mu^{2}_{N}. \label{eq:m1-moi}$$ Here $g_{p}$ and $g_{n}$ denote the orbital gyromagnetic factors associated with the rotation of the deformed proton and neutron systems, respectively. It turned out that the early calculations of both the excitation energy and the $M1$ strength gave too large values compared with the first experimental observations of $1^{+}$ scissors excitations in deformed nuclei (the $B(M1)$ value exceeds experimental values for the strongest $1^{+}$ states by a factor of almost $7$). However, it cannot be emphasized enough how important the seminal work of @LoIudice:1978 [@LoIudice:1979] has been in the experimental search which finally led to the discovery of the scissors mode in $^{156}$Gd [@Bohle:1984a]. Moreover, the confrontation of the conceptually simple two-rotor model (TRM) with the wealth of experimental data having accumulated rapidly in the late eighties and early nineties of the last century has led to a steady improvement of the model [@LoIudice:1997; @LoIudice:2000a] which is still the one allowing a good first insight in the dynamics which causes the scissors mode to show up at all
h s.), the following Hamiltonian was set up $ $ \label{eqn: H } H=\frac{(\hat{I}_{\pi}+\hat{I}_{\nu})^{2}}{2J_{intr}}+ 
 \frac{(\hat{I}_{\pi}-\hat{I}_{\nu})^{2}}{2J_{intr}}+\frac{1}{2}C\theta^{2 }, 
 \label{eq: hamiltonian}$$ in which the restoring force changeless $ C$ is relate to the symmetry energy constant in the semi - empirical multitude formula. Using know properties of deformed nuclei: the moment of inactiveness $ J_{intr}$ of the earth - state ring, the symmetry energy and the $ B(E2;0^{+}_{1}\rightarrow2^{+}_{1}$) conversion lastingness, one can determine both the excitation energy $ E_{sc } = \hbar\sqrt{C / J_{intr}}$ and the $ B(M1)$ transition strength $ $ \label{eqn: bacillus } B(M1;0^{+}\rightarrow1^{+})=\frac{3}{16\pi } 
 \frac{J_{intr}}{\hbar^2 } 
 E_{sc}(g_{p}-g_{n})^{2}~\mu^{2}_{N }. \label{eq: m1 - moi}$$ Here $ g_{p}$ and $ g_{n}$ denote the orbital gyromagnetic factors associated with the rotation of the deform proton and neutron systems, respectively. It turned out that the early calculations of both the excitation department of energy and the $ M1 $ strength give too large values compare with the first experimental observations of $ 1^{+}$ scissors excitations in deformed nuclei (the $ B(M1)$ value exceeds experimental values for the strongest $ 1^{+}$ states by a factor of almost $ 7 $). However, it cannot be emphasized enough how important the seminal work of @LoIudice:1978 [ @LoIudice:1979 ] has been in the experimental search which finally led to the discovery of the scissors mode in $ ^{156}$Gd [ @Bohle:1984a ]. Moreover, the confrontation of the conceptually simple two - rotor exemplar (TRM) with the wealth of experimental data having accumulated quickly in the belated eighty and early nineties of the last century has led to a steady improvement of the model [ @LoIudice:1997; @LoIudice:2000a ] which is still the one allowing a effective first insight in the dynamics which causes the scissors mode to show up at all
h s.), the following Hamiltonixn was set up $$\lcvel{eqn:I} H=\frac{(\gat{I}_{\pi}+\hag{I}_{\nu})^{2}}{2J_{intr}}+
\frac{(\hat{I}_{\pi}-\hat{I}_{\nu})^{2}}{2J_{invr}}+\frqc{1}{2}C\thtna^{2},
\label{eq:hamiltonian}$$ kn which nhe restoeing dorce consvznt $C$ is relafcd to vhe symmetry engrgy constand in the semi-ekpkrncal mass formula. Using known propereies of dfformed nuclei: the iomehn if inertia $J_{intr}$ of the grouns-state uand, the symmetty energy and the $B(E2;0^{+}_{1}\rightagrow2^{+}_{1}$) transition strenghh, one can eetewnine both thd excitation energy $E_{sd} =\hbar\sqrt{C/J_{intr}}$ and the $B(M1)$ travsitipn strengty $$\oabfn{eqn:B} B(M1;0^{+}\rigitarror1^{+})=\frac{3}{16\pi}
\frac{J_{lmtr}}{\hbas^2}
E_{sc}(g_{p}-g_{m})^{2}~\mu^{2}_{N}. \label{eq:m1-mpi}$$ Iere $g_{p}$ and $g_{n}$ denote the orbital gyromagnejic factorv cssociated with the ritqtion of dhe awfofmes 'rofon anf nxutron systsms, respectuvely. It turned out trqt the early dalculwtyons of both the excitation energy and uhe $M1$ strength gave too largw values compared witj the firft experimental observations of $1^{+}$ scissors excitathons mn deyirmed buflei (the $B(M1)$ value exceeds experimental values rot nhe strongest $1^{+}$ stctes by a factor ov sjmost $7$). Howevet, it cauhof be emphasized enlugh hor impirtant tht semonal work of @LoIudice:1978 [@LoIuduce:1979] has been un the experimentap search whnch fimally led to the discovery oy the acissors mofe in $^{156}$Gd [@Guhle:1984a]. Moreover, tfe bonfsontation of the conceptuajly simplx two-xotor moael (JRM) witr the wealhh of experimental data javiny accgmulated rwpidly in the late eighties and early ninetiex mf nhe last eenturn has led to a fteady improvekent of the oodel [@LoIusice:1997; @LoMudice:2000a] whicr is still tha one allowinj a good sirsr inwight iv the dynamics ehich causes the scussors mode to shox up zt all
h s.), the following Hamiltonian was set H=\frac{(\hat{I}_{\pi}+\hat{I}_{\nu})^{2}}{2J_{intr}}+ \label{eq:hamiltonian}$$ in the restoring force the energy constant in semi-empirical mass formula. known properties of deformed nuclei: the of inertia $J_{intr}$ of the ground-state band, the symmetry energy and the $B(E2;0^{+}_{1}\rightarrow2^{+}_{1}$) strength, one can determine both the excitation energy $E_{sc} =\hbar\sqrt{C/J_{intr}}$ and the $B(M1)$ strength B(M1;0^{+}\rightarrow1^{+})=\frac{3}{16\pi} E_{sc}(g_{p}-g_{n})^{2}~\mu^{2}_{N}. Here $g_{p}$ and $g_{n}$ denote the orbital gyromagnetic factors associated with the rotation of the deformed and neutron systems, respectively. It turned out that early calculations of both excitation energy and the $M1$ gave large values with first observations of $1^{+}$ excitations in deformed nuclei (the $B(M1)$ value exceeds experimental values for the strongest $1^{+}$ states by a of almost it cannot emphasized how the seminal work [@LoIudice:1979] has been in the experimental led to the discovery of the scissors mode $^{156}$Gd [@Bohle:1984a]. the confrontation of the conceptually simple model (TRM) with the wealth of experimental data accumulated rapidly in the late eighties and early nineties of the last century has led steady improvement of the [@LoIudice:1997; @LoIudice:2000a] which still one a first insight the dynamics which causes the scissors mode to show up at
h s.), the following Hamiltonian Was set up $$\laBel{eqN:H} H=\FraC{(\hAt{I}_{\pI}+\hat{i}_{\nu})^{2}}{2J_{intr}}+
\frac{(\haT{i}_{\pi}-\hAt{I}_{\nu})^{2}}{2J_{intr}}+\frac{1}{2}C\theta^{2},
\laBel{eq:HaMIltoNIaN}$$ in whIch the rEStORIng FoRcE coNsTAnT $C$ is rElaTed to thE symmetry eNerGy Constant in thE SeMi-empiricaL maSs formula. UsiNg kNown prOpErtIEs of dEfoRmed nUclei: tHE momenT of inertiA $J_{INtr}$ of tHE ground-STAtE banD, the symmetry energY AnD The $B(E2;0^{+}_{1}\rightarroW2^{+}_{1}$) transItIOn STRenGth, One can deteRmIne boTH the excITaTION enERgy $E_{sc} =\hbar\sqrT{C/J_{intr}}$ and tHE $B(M1)$ TransiTiOn sTRength $$\Label{EqN:b} B(M1;0^{+}\Rightarrow1^{+})=\fRac{3}{16\pI}
\frac{J_{intR}}{\hbar^2}
E_{SC}(g_{p}-g_{n})^{2}~\mu^{2}_{n}. \Label{eq:M1-moi}$$ HeRe $g_{P}$ anD $g_{n}$ dENoTe The OrBItaL GyRomAGneTic factoRs AsSociaTed wITH THe roTatIon oF the dEformed proton And NeutROn sYstemS, respEctiVeLy. It tUrned oUt thaT tHe early calculatIons Of both the ExcItAtiOn EnergY And the $m1$ stRenGth gave Too largE ValUeS COMpAred with the first exPeRIMeNtal obseRvatioNS oF $1^{+}$ sCIssors exCiTatIons IN DeforMed nUClEi (the $B(M1)$ vAlue exCEeDs ExperimEnTal valUeS foR thE stroNGest $1^{+}$ States By a factoR of alMOst $7$). However, it caNNot be emphasizED eNOUgH How iMpoRtant the semInal WOrk oF @LoIUDiCe:1978 [@LOiudicE:1979] has bEeN In THe experimental searcH wHich fiNally Led to the discoVery of the sCISSors mode In $^{156}$Gd [@bOhLE:1984a]. Moreover, the cOnfroNtation of tHE conceptUally Simple twO-rotor modEL (tRM) with tHe wEalTh oF exPERiMental data havING accUmUlated rApiDly in thE laTe eIghTieS aNd early niNeties of ThE lAsT cEntUry haS Led to a stEaDy iMpRovEment OF the moDel [@LoiudiCe:1997; @loiUdiCe:2000a] whicH Is STIll tHe OnE allOwiNg A good FirsT InsIght in tHe dynamicS whICh caUsEs The scisSors mode to shoW uP at all
h s.), the following Hamil tonian was  setup$$\ la bel{ eqn: H} H=\frac{(\h a t{I} _{\pi}+\hat{I}_{\nu})^ {2}}{ 2J _ {int r }} +
\fr ac{(\ha t {I } _ {\p i} -\ hat {I } _{ \nu}) ^{2 }}{2J_{ intr}}+\fr ac{ 1} {2}C\theta^{ 2 }, 
\label{eq :ha miltonian}$$  in  which  t her estor ing  forc e cons t ant $C $ is rela te d  to th e  symmet r y  e nerg y constant in the se m i-empirical ma ss for mu l a. U sin g k nown prope rt ies o f  deform e dn u c lei :  the moment o f inertia $ J _{i ntr}$of  th e  groun d-sta te ban d, the symm etry  energy a nd the $B(E2;0 ^ {+}_{1} \right arr ow2 ^{+} _ {1 }$ ) t ra n sit i on  st r eng th, oneca ndeter mine b o t h th e e xcit ation  energy $E_{s c}=\hb a r\s qrt{C /J_{i ntr} }$  andthe $B (M1)$  t ransition stren gth$$\label{ eqn :B } B (M 1;0^{ + }\righ tar row 1^{+})= \frac{3 } {16 \p i } \f rac{J_{intr}}{\hba r^ 2 } 
E _{sc}(g_ {p}-g_ { n} )^ { 2}~\mu^{ 2} _{N }. \ l a bel{e q:m1 - mo i}$$ Her e $g_{ p }$  a nd $g_{ n} $ deno te  th e o rbita l  gyr omagne tic fact ors a s sociated witht he rotation o f  t h e  d e form edproton andneut r on s yste m s,  re s pecti vely.  I t  t u rned out that the e ar ly cal culat ions of boththe excita t i o n energy  and th e  $M1$ strength  gave  too large values c ompar ed withthe first e xperimen tal  ob ser vat i o ns  of $1^{+}$ s c i ssor sexcitat ion s in de for med  nu cle i(the $B(M 1)$ valu eex ce ed s e xperi m ental va lu esfo r t he st r ongest  $1^{ +}$st at e s b y a fac t or o f al mo st  $7$ ).Ho wever , it can not beemphasize d e n ough  h ow  import ant the semin al  work of @ Lo Iud ice:19 7 8  [@LoIud ice:1979] has been in t h e exper ime ntalsear ch whichfin ally l edt o thediscov ery o fthe s cisso r s  m ode  i n $^{156}$ G d  [@ Bohle :1 984a ]. More over, the confront a tio n of the conc ept uall y si mpl e  t w o-r ot o r m o d el (TRM) with t he wealthof ex perimental dat ahavingaccumul atedr apidlyin the la te eighti es  and e arl y nineties  of thelast cent u ry ha s  l ed to  asteady  i mpr oveme nt oft hemodel  [@LoI ud ice:19 97; @ Lo Iudice:2 000a] which is still th e oneallow ing  a good f irs t  in sight inthedynamics w hic h c auses  th e  scis sors mo det o sho w up at all
h s.),_the following_Hamiltonian was set up_$$\label{eqn:H} H=\frac{(\hat{I}_{\pi}+\hat{I}_{\nu})^{2}}{2J_{intr}}+
\frac{(\hat{I}_{\pi}-\hat{I}_{\nu})^{2}}{2J_{intr}}+\frac{1}{2}C\theta^{2},
\label{eq:hamiltonian}$$_in_which the_restoring_force constant $C$_is related to_the symmetry energy constant_in the semi-empirical_mass_formula. Using known properties of deformed nuclei: the moment of inertia $J_{intr}$ of the_ground-state_band, the_symmetry_energy_and the $B(E2;0^{+}_{1}\rightarrow2^{+}_{1}$) transition strength,_one can determine both the_excitation energy_$E_{sc} =\hbar\sqrt{C/J_{intr}}$ and the $B(M1)$ transition strength $$\label{eqn:B}_B(M1;0^{+}\rightarrow1^{+})=\frac{3}{16\pi}
\frac{J_{intr}}{\hbar^2}
E_{sc}(g_{p}-g_{n})^{2}~\mu^{2}_{N}._\label{eq:m1-moi}$$ Here $g_{p}$_and $g_{n}$ denote the orbital gyromagnetic factors associated with_the rotation of the deformed proton_and neutron systems,_respectively._It_turned out that the_early calculations of both the excitation_energy and the $M1$ strength gave_too large values compared with the first_experimental observations of $1^{+}$ scissors excitations_in deformed nuclei (the $B(M1)$_value exceeds_experimental values for the strongest_$1^{+}$ states by_a factor_of almost $7$)._However, it cannot be emphasized enough_how important the_seminal work of @LoIudice:1978 [@LoIudice:1979] has_been_in the experimental_search_which_finally led_to the discovery_of_the scissors_mode_in $^{156}$Gd [@Bohle:1984a]. Moreover, the confrontation_of_the conceptually simple two-rotor model (TRM) with_the wealth of experimental_data_having accumulated rapidly in_the late eighties and early_nineties of the last century has_led to_a steady_improvement of the model [@LoIudice:1997; @LoIudice:2000a] which is still the one_allowing a good first insight in_the dynamics which causes_the scissors_mode_to show up_at_all