2e+1},\pi_{2e+2}),\ldots,(\pi_{2m-1},\pi_{2m})\}.$$ By the same argument as in Case (5) of the proof of Lemma \[len2\], for any $e+1\leq k<l\leq o$, the term $p_{\lambda_{i_{k}}}p_{\lambda_{i_{l}}}$ appears as a term of the lowest degree in the power sum expansion of $Q_{(\lambda_{i_k},\lambda_{i_l})}$. Moreover, if the power sum symmetric function $p_{\lambda_{i_{e+1}}}p_{\lambda_{i_{e+2}}}\cdots
p_{\lambda_{i_o}}$ appears as a term of the lowest degree in the power sum expansion of the product $Q_{(\lambda_{\pi_{2e+1}},\lambda_{\pi_{2e+2}})}\cdots
Q_{(\lambda_{\pi_{2m-1}},\lambda_{\pi_{2m}})}$, then the composition of the pairs $\{(\pi_{2e+1},\pi_{2e+2}),\ldots,(\pi_{2m-1},\pi_{2m})\}$ could be any matching of $\{1,2,\ldots,2m\}/\{i_1,j_1,\ldots,i_e,j_e\}$.

To summarize, there are $(2(m-e)-1)!!$ matchings $\pi$ such that $A$ appears as a term of the lowest degree in the power sum expansion of the product $Q_{(\lambda_{\pi_1},\lambda_{\pi_2})}\cdots
Q_{(\lambda_{\pi_{2m-1}},\lambda_{\pi_{2m}})}$. Combining Corollary \[2odd\] and Theorem \[conn\], we find that the coefficient of $p_{\lambda_{i_k}}p_{\lambda_{i_l}}$ $(e+1\leq k<l\leq o)$ in the power sum expansion of $Q_{(\lambda_{i_k}, \lambda_{i_l})}$ is $-\frac{4}{\lambda_{i_k}\lambda_{i_l}}$. It follows that the coefficient of $A$ in the expansion of the product $Q_{(\lambda_{\pi_1},\lambda_{\pi_2})}\cdots
Q_{(\lambda_{\pi_{2m-1}}, \lambda_{\pi_{2m}})}$ is independent of the choice of $\pi$. Since
2e+1},\pi_{2e+2}),\ldots,(\pi_{2m-1},\pi_{2m})\}.$$ By the same argument as in Case (5) of the proof of Lemma \[len2\ ], for any $ e+1\leq k < l\leq o$, the condition $ p_{\lambda_{i_{k}}}p_{\lambda_{i_{l}}}$ appear as a term of the lowest degree in the office sum expansion of $ Q_{(\lambda_{i_k},\lambda_{i_l})}$. Moreover, if the might union symmetric function $ p_{\lambda_{i_{e+1}}}p_{\lambda_{i_{e+2}}}\cdots 
 p_{\lambda_{i_o}}$ look as a term of the lowest academic degree in the power sum expansion of the product $ Q_{(\lambda_{\pi_{2e+1}},\lambda_{\pi_{2e+2}})}\cdots 
 Q_{(\lambda_{\pi_{2m-1}},\lambda_{\pi_{2m}})}$, then the composition of the pair $ \{(\pi_{2e+1},\pi_{2e+2}),\ldots,(\pi_{2m-1},\pi_{2m})\}$ could be any matching of $ \{1,2,\ldots,2m\}/\{i_1,j_1,\ldots, i_e, j_e\}$. 

 To summarize, there are $ (2(m - e)-1)!!$ matchings $ \pi$ such that $ A$ appears as a term of the depleted degree in the power sum expansion of the intersection $ Q_{(\lambda_{\pi_1},\lambda_{\pi_2})}\cdots 
 Q_{(\lambda_{\pi_{2m-1}},\lambda_{\pi_{2m}})}$. Combining Corollary \[2odd\ ] and Theorem \[conn\ ], we find that the coefficient of $ p_{\lambda_{i_k}}p_{\lambda_{i_l}}$ $ (e+1\leq k < l\leq o)$ in the power kernel expansion of $ Q_{(\lambda_{i_k }, \lambda_{i_l})}$ is $ -\frac{4}{\lambda_{i_k}\lambda_{i_l}}$. It follows that the coefficient of $ A$ in the expansion of the product $ Q_{(\lambda_{\pi_1},\lambda_{\pi_2})}\cdots 
 Q_{(\lambda_{\pi_{2m-1 } }, \lambda_{\pi_{2m}})}$ is independent of the choice of $ \pi$. Since
2e+1},\pi_{2f+2}),\ldots,(\pi_{2m-1},\pi_{2m})\}.$$ By the same argument as in Case (5) mf the proof ow Lemma \[len2\], for any $e+1\leq k<l\lxq o$, the uvrm $p_{\lambda_{i_{k}}}p_{\lambda_{i_{u}}}$ appears as a teem oh the lowest degcse in tmz powsv sum xxpansion of $Q_{(\lsmbda_{i_k},\lamtda_{i_l})}$. Moreover, iw che power sum symmetric function $p_{\laibda_{i_{e+1}}}p_{\kalbda_{i_{e+2}}}\cdots
p_{\laibda_{p_o}}$ appsars as a term of the lowest degres in tht power sum expansoon of the product $Q_{(\lambda_{\oi_{2e+1}},\lwmbda_{\pi_{2e+2}})}\cdots
Q_{(\lambfa_{\pi_{2m-1}},\lambda_{\kj_{2m}})}$, eyen the compusition of the pairs $\{(\pj_{2e+1},\pi_{2e+2}),\ldots,(\pi_{2m-1},\pi_{2m})\}$ could be any mxtchiug of $\{1,2,\ldots,2n\}/\{i_1,h_1,\ldljs,i_e,j_e\}$.

To sumnarizv, there are $(2(m-c)-1)!!$ matchhngs $\pi$ such that $A$ aipearv aw a term of the lowesv degree in the powet sum expatsnon of the product $Q_{(\lqmvda_{\pi_1},\nambga_{\pi_2})}\zeotr
Q_{(\lzmuda_{\li_{2m-1}},\lamhda_{\'i_{2m}})}$. Combinihg Corollart \[2odd\] and Theorem \[cpng\], we find that the cjesficient of $p_{\lambda_{i_k}}p_{\lambda_{i_l}}$ $(e+1\leq k<l\ltq o)$ jn the power sum expansuon of $Q_{(\lambda_{i_k}, \lambfa_{i_l})}$ is $-\fwac{4}{\lambda_{i_k}\lambda_{i_l}}$. It follows that the coefficiett of $X$ iu the dzpwnsion of the product $Q_{(\lambda_{\pi_1},\lambda_{\pi_2})}\cdots
Q_{(\jzmnds_{\pi_{2m-1}}, \lambda_{\pi_{2m}})}$ is indepencejt jf the choice of $\pi$. Sihce
2e+1},\pi_{2e+2}),\ldots,(\pi_{2m-1},\pi_{2m})\}.$$ By the same argument as in of proof of \[len2\], for any $p_{\lambda_{i_{k}}}p_{\lambda_{i_{l}}}$ as a term the lowest degree the power sum expansion of $Q_{(\lambda_{i_k},\lambda_{i_l})}$. if the power sum symmetric function $p_{\lambda_{i_{e+1}}}p_{\lambda_{i_{e+2}}}\cdots p_{\lambda_{i_o}}$ appears as a term of lowest degree in the power sum expansion of the product $Q_{(\lambda_{\pi_{2e+1}},\lambda_{\pi_{2e+2}})}\cdots Q_{(\lambda_{\pi_{2m-1}},\lambda_{\pi_{2m}})}$, then composition the $\{(\pi_{2e+1},\pi_{2e+2}),\ldots,(\pi_{2m-1},\pi_{2m})\}$ be any matching of $\{1,2,\ldots,2m\}/\{i_1,j_1,\ldots,i_e,j_e\}$. To summarize, there are $(2(m-e)-1)!!$ matchings $\pi$ such that $A$ appears a term of the lowest degree in the sum expansion of the $Q_{(\lambda_{\pi_1},\lambda_{\pi_2})}\cdots Q_{(\lambda_{\pi_{2m-1}},\lambda_{\pi_{2m}})}$. Combining Corollary \[2odd\] Theorem we find the of $(e+1\leq k<l\leq o)$ the power sum expansion of $Q_{(\lambda_{i_k}, \lambda_{i_l})}$ is $-\frac{4}{\lambda_{i_k}\lambda_{i_l}}$. It follows that the coefficient of $A$ in expansion of $Q_{(\lambda_{\pi_1},\lambda_{\pi_2})}\cdots Q_{(\lambda_{\pi_{2m-1}}, is of choice of $\pi$.
2e+1},\pi_{2e+2}),\ldots,(\pi_{2m-1},\pi_{2m})\}.$$ By the same aRgument as iN Case (5) Of tHe pRoOf of lemmA \[len2\], for any $e+1\leq K<L\leq O$, the term $p_{\lambda_{i_{k}}}p_{\lambDa_{i_{l}}}$ aPpEArs aS A tErm of The loweST dEGRee In ThE poWeR SuM expaNsiOn of $Q_{(\laMbda_{i_k},\lambDa_{i_L})}$. MOreover, if the POwEr sum symmeTriC function $p_{\laMbdA_{i_{e+1}}}p_{\laMbDa_{i_{E+2}}}\Cdots
P_{\laMbda_{i_O}}$ appeaRS as a teRm of the loWeST degreE In the poWER sUm exPansion of the produCT $Q_{(\LAmbda_{\pi_{2e+1}},\lambda_{\Pi_{2e+2}})}\cdoTs
q_{(\LaMBDa_{\pI_{2m-1}},\lAmbda_{\pi_{2m}})}$, thEn The coMPositioN Of THE PaiRS $\{(\pi_{2e+1},\pi_{2e+2}),\ldots,(\pI_{2m-1},\pi_{2m})\}$ could bE Any MatchiNg Of $\{1,2,\lDOts,2m\}/\{i_1,j_1,\Ldots,I_e,J_E\}$.

To Summarize, thEre aRe $(2(m-e)-1)!!$ matchIngs $\pi$ SUch that $a$ Appears As a terM of The LoweST dEgRee In THe pOWeR suM ExpAnsion of ThE pRoducT $Q_{(\laMBDA_{\Pi_1},\laMbdA_{\pi_2})}\cDots
Q_{(\Lambda_{\pi_{2m-1}},\lambDa_{\pI_{2m}})}$. CoMBinIng CoRollaRy \[2odD\] aNd TheOrem \[coNn\], we fInD that the coefficIent Of $p_{\lambda_{I_k}}p_{\LaMbdA_{i_L}}$ $(e+1\leq K<L\leq o)$ iN thE poWer sum eXpansioN Of $Q_{(\LaMBDA_{i_K}, \lambda_{i_l})}$ is $-\frac{4}{\lamBdA_{I_K}\lAmbda_{i_l}}$. IT folloWS tHaT The coeffIcIenT of $A$ IN The exPansIOn Of the proDuct $Q_{(\lAMbDa_{\Pi_1},\lambdA_{\pI_2})}\cdots
q_{(\lAmbDa_{\pI_{2m-1}}, \lamBDa_{\pi_{2M}})}$ is indEpendent Of the CHoice of $\pi$. Since
2e+1},\pi_{2e+2}),\ldots,( \pi_{2m-1} ,\pi_ {2m })\ }. $$ B y th e same argumen t  asin Case (5) of the pro of of  L e mma\ [l en2\] , for a n y$ e +1\ le qk<l \l e qo$, t heterm $p _{\lambda_ {i_ {k }}}p_{\lambd a _{ i_{l}}}$ a ppe ars as a ter m o f thelo wes t  degr eein th e powe r  sum e xpansionof $Q_{(\ l ambda_{ i _ k} ,\la mbda_{i_l})}$. Mo r eo v er, if the pow er sum  s y mm e t ric  fu nction $p_ {\ lambd a _{i_{e+ 1 }} } p _ {\l a mbda_{i_{e+2} }}\cdots
p_ { \la mbda_{ i_ o}} $  appea rs as  a ter m of the lo west  degree i n thep ower su m  expans ion of  th e p rodu c t$Q _{( \l a mbd a _{ \pi _ {2e +1}},\la mb da _{\pi _{2e + 2 } } )}\c dot s
Q_ {(\la mbda_{\pi_{2m -1} },\l a mbd a_{\p i_{2m }})} $,  then  the c ompos it ion of the pair s $\ {(\pi_{2e +1} ,\ pi_ {2 e+2}) , \ldots ,(\ pi_ {2m-1}, \pi_{2m } )\} $c o u ld  be any matching o f$ \ {1 ,2,\ldot s,2m\} / \{ i_ 1 ,j_1,\ld ot s,i _e,j _ e \}$.
Tos um marize,therea re  $ (2(m-e) -1 )!!$ m at chi ngs  $\pi $  suc h that  $A$ app earsa s a term of th e  lowest degre e  i n th e  pow ersum expansi on o f  the  pro d uc t $ Q _{(\l ambda _{ \ pi _ 1},\lambda_{\pi_2}) }\ cdotsQ_{(\ lambda_{\pi_{ 2m-1}},\la m b d a_{\pi_{ 2m}} ) }$ .  Combining Cor ollar y \[2odd\] and Theo rem \ [conn\],  we findt h at the c oef fic ien t o f $p _{\lambda_{i_ k } }p_{ \l ambda_{ i_l }}$ $(e +1\ leq  k< l\l eq  o)$ in t he power  s um  e xp ans ion o f  $Q_{(\l am bda _{ i_k }, \l a mbda_{ i_l}) }$ i s$- \ fra c{4}{\l a mb d a _{i_ k} \l ambd a_{ i_ l}}$.  Itf oll ows tha t the coe ffi c ient  o f$A$ inthe expansion  o f the prod uc t $ Q_{(\l a m bda_{\pi _1},\lambda_{\pi_2})}\c d ots
Q_{ (\l ambda _{\p i_{2m-1}} , \ lambda _{\ p i_{2m} })}$ i s ind ep end e n t oft h echo ic e of $\pi$ . Sin ce
2e+1},\pi_{2e+2}),\ldots,(\pi_{2m-1},\pi_{2m})\}.$$ By_the same_argument as in Case_(5) of_the_proof of_Lemma_\[len2\], for any_$e+1\leq k<l\leq o$,_the term $p_{\lambda_{i_{k}}}p_{\lambda_{i_{l}}}$ appears_as a term_of_the lowest degree in the power sum expansion of $Q_{(\lambda_{i_k},\lambda_{i_l})}$. Moreover, if the power_sum_symmetric function_$p_{\lambda_{i_{e+1}}}p_{\lambda_{i_{e+2}}}\cdots
p_{\lambda_{i_o}}$_appears_as a term of the_lowest degree in the power_sum expansion_of the product $Q_{(\lambda_{\pi_{2e+1}},\lambda_{\pi_{2e+2}})}\cdots
Q_{(\lambda_{\pi_{2m-1}},\lambda_{\pi_{2m}})}$, then the composition of_the_pairs $\{(\pi_{2e+1},\pi_{2e+2}),\ldots,(\pi_{2m-1},\pi_{2m})\}$ could_be any matching of $\{1,2,\ldots,2m\}/\{i_1,j_1,\ldots,i_e,j_e\}$.

To summarize, there are $(2(m-e)-1)!!$_matchings $\pi$ such that $A$ appears_as a term_of_the_lowest degree in the_power sum expansion of the product_$Q_{(\lambda_{\pi_1},\lambda_{\pi_2})}\cdots
Q_{(\lambda_{\pi_{2m-1}},\lambda_{\pi_{2m}})}$. Combining Corollary \[2odd\] and Theorem_\[conn\], we find that the coefficient of_$p_{\lambda_{i_k}}p_{\lambda_{i_l}}$ $(e+1\leq k<l\leq o)$ in the_power sum expansion of $Q_{(\lambda_{i_k},_\lambda_{i_l})}$ is_$-\frac{4}{\lambda_{i_k}\lambda_{i_l}}$. It follows that the_coefficient of $A$_in the_expansion of the_product $Q_{(\lambda_{\pi_1},\lambda_{\pi_2})}\cdots
Q_{(\lambda_{\pi_{2m-1}}, \lambda_{\pi_{2m}})}$ is independent of_the choice of_$\pi$. Since