 and still play a role in carving the circumbinary disc. For example, applying the results of @Artymowicz1994 indicates an aligned binary with mass ratio $q\sim0.1$, an eccentricity of $\sim 0.5$ will truncate the circumbinary disc between $3-4$ times the binary separation. HD 142527’s binary separation is $20^{+17}_{-10}$ AU and eccentricity is $0.5\pm0.2$; thus, the companion can orbit in the same plane as the circumbinary disc and still truncate the disc’s dust component at $\sim 100$ AU. Further monitoring of the companion should be able to determine its orbital plane, and test the resonant scenario presented here.

Summary
=======

We have shown that secular precession resonances can operate in protostellar gapped/binary discs, which can result in a misalignment between the circumstellar (inner) and circumbinary (outer) discs. For some cases, the generated misalignments can be large ($\gtrsim 60$ degrees) resulting from crossing a precession resonance between the circumstellar disc and a low-mass companion (or massive planet) as the system evolves. Our main results are summarised below:

1.  We identify two secular precession resonances in gapped/binary disc systems. First, a resonance between the precession of the circumstellar and circumbinary discs. Second, a resonance between the precession of the circumstellar disc and a low-mass companion residing in a gap between the circumstellar and circumbinary disc.\

2.  The resonance between the circumstellar and circumbinary disc cannot lead to large misalignments as both discs precess independently, even in “resonance”.\

3.  The resonance between the circumstellar disc and companion can lead to significant misalignments, even from systems that are close to being co-planar initially, provided that the resonance crossing occurs on the right timescale. This typically requires that the companion has a mass $\sim 0.01-0.1\,$M$_\odot$, separation $\sim 10-100\,$AU for an approximately solar mass primary and that the circumbinary disc dominates the angular momentum budget of the system. Such requirements are [*not*]{} satisfied by giant – of order Jupiter mass – planets in “transition” discs.\

4.  In numerical calculations of realistic systems we find mis
and still play a role in carving the circumbinary magnetic disk. For case, applying the results of @Artymowicz1994 indicates an align binary with mass proportion $ q\sim0.1 $, an eccentricity of $ \sim 0.5 $ will truncate the circumbinary disc between $ 3 - 4 $ times the binary separation. HD   142527 ’s binary interval is $ 20^{+17}_{-10}$   AU and eccentricity is $ 0.5\pm0.2 $; thus, the companion can orbit in the like plane as the circumbinary disc and still truncate the disc ’s debris component at $ \sim 100 $   AU. Further monitoring of the companion should be able to determine its orbital airplane, and test the evocative scenario present here. 

 Summary 
 = = = = = = = 

 We have shown that secular precession resonances can manoeuver in protostellar gapped / binary discs, which can result in a misalignment between the circumstellar (inside) and circumbinary (outer) disk. For some cases, the beget misalignments can be large ($ \gtrsim 60 $   degrees) result from crossing a precession resonance between the circumstellar disc and a low - mass companion (or massive planet) as the system evolves. Our main results are summarised below: 

 1.   We identify two secular precession resonances in gapped / binary disc systems. foremost, a plangency between the precession of the circumstellar and circumbinary discs. Second, a rapport between the precession of the circumstellar magnetic disk and a low - mass companion residing in a break between the circumstellar and circumbinary disc.\ 

 2.   The resonance between the circumstellar and circumbinary disc cannot lead to large misalignment as both discs precess independently, even in “ resonance”.\ 

 3.   The resonance between the circumstellar disc and companion can lead to significant misalignments, even from systems that are close to being co - planar initially, provided that the resonance crossing occur on the right timescale. This typically necessitate that the companion has a mass $ \sim 0.01 - 0.1\,$M$_\odot$, separation $ \sim 10 - 100\,$AU for an approximately solar mass primary and that the circumbinary magnetic disk dominates the angular momentum budget of the system. Such requirements are [ * not * ] { } meet by giant – of order Jupiter mass – planets in “ conversion ” discs.\ 

 4.   In numerical calculation of realistic systems we recover mis
 anf still play a role in cxrving the circomvinary disc. Ror examole, applying the results of @Ertynowice1994 indicates an aligved binarj with maws retio $q\sim0.1$, an eccxhtricitn of $\alm 0.5$ wnlo truncate the circumbindry disc betwean $3-4$ cimes the binary separation. HD 142527’s binawy sepatahion is $20^{+17}_{-10}$ AU and ecctntwicifj ls $0.5\pm0.2$; thus, the companion can orbjt in tie same plane ax the circumbinary disc anf stlll truncate the dlsc’s dust cimpogwnt at $\sim 100$ AJ. Further monitoring or the companion should be able go decermine its oebihdl plane, anv test the resonanb scenasio prexented here.

Sumkarb
=======

We yave shown that seculer precession resonagces can mpzrate in protostellar gqpped/tinasy dkwcs, whjci czn resklt in a misamignment berween the circumsteklwg (inner) and cjrcumbynwry (outer) discs. For some cases, the genegates misalignments can be oarge ($\gtrsim 60$ degrees) tesulting srom crossing a precession resonance between the wircujrteolwf dlsc and a low-mass companion (or massive planet) zs tme system evolvef. Our main tedukjs are summarired below:

1.  We identify two decular precwssion refonamces in gapped/binary disc ststems. First, q resonance betweeu the precesrion of tne circumstellar and cixcumbihary discs. Decond, a ddsonance between thv pracession of the circumsteljar disc end a low-masr cokpaniog residing in a gap between the cigcumsjellar and circulbinary disc.\

2.  The resonance betxxen the circuksdelnar and eircumninary disc cangot lead to latge misalngnmengs as both discs 'recess inde[endently, evet in “resonancx”.\

3.  The refonabce vetween ghe circumstelkar disc cud companuon can lead to sinnifizznt misalignmencr, even from systrms thwt ace cljve to being wo-plxnaf initkally, provibea thst the resonance crovsinf occurs on the ribhb timescaoe. This eypically reqiires that the comkanion har a msss $\sim 0.01-0.1\,$M$_\odot$, separation $\sim 10-100\,$AU fkr an appgoxlmately solar masw primary anb that the circumbinary disc dominates tie angular momentum budtet of the system. Soch requiremenvs are [*not*]{} sativfied by giant – of oeder Jupiter mass – planets in “transitikn” disws.\

4.  Ij numerical calculations of realistic systems we find mis
and still play a role in carving disc. example, applying results of @Artymowicz1994 mass $q\sim0.1$, an eccentricity $\sim 0.5$ will the circumbinary disc between $3-4$ times binary separation. HD 142527’s binary separation is $20^{+17}_{-10}$ AU and eccentricity is $0.5\pm0.2$; the companion can orbit in the same plane as the circumbinary disc and truncate disc’s component $\sim 100$ AU. Further monitoring of the companion should be able to determine its orbital plane, test the resonant scenario presented here. Summary ======= have shown that secular resonances can operate in protostellar discs, can result a between circumstellar (inner) and (outer) discs. For some cases, the generated misalignments can be large ($\gtrsim 60$ degrees) resulting from crossing precession resonance circumstellar disc a companion massive planet) as evolves. Our main results are summarised identify two secular precession resonances in gapped/binary disc First, a between the precession of the circumstellar circumbinary discs. Second, a resonance between the precession the circumstellar disc and a low-mass companion residing in a gap between the circumstellar and 2. The resonance between circumstellar and circumbinary cannot to misalignments both discs independently, even in “resonance”.\ 3. The resonance between the circumstellar disc companion can lead to significant misalignments, even from systems that to co-planar initially, provided the resonance crossing occurs the timescale. This typically requires companion a separation 10-100\,$AU an approximately solar mass and that the circumbinary disc the angular momentum budget are [*not*]{} satisfied by giant – of order mass – planets in “transition” discs.\ 4. numerical calculations of realistic systems we find mis
 and still play a role in carvinG the circumBinarY diSc. FOr ExamPle, aPplying the resuLTs of @artymowicz1994 indicates an aLigneD bINary WItH mass Ratio $q\sIM0.1$, aN ECceNtRiCitY oF $\SiM 0.5$ will TruNcate thE circumbinAry DiSc between $3-4$ timES tHe binary seParAtion. HD 142527’s binaRy sEparatIoN is $20^{+17}_{-10}$ au and eCceNtricIty is $0.5\pM0.2$; Thus, thE companioN cAN orbit IN the samE PLaNe as The circumbinary diSC aND still truncate The disC’s DUsT COmpOneNt at $\sim 100$ AU. FUrTher mONitorinG Of THE ComPAnion should be Able to deterMIne Its orbItAl pLAne, and Test tHe REsoNant scenariO preSented herE.

SummaRY
=======

We have SHown thaT seculAr pRecEssiON rEsOnaNcES caN OpEraTE in ProtosteLlAr GappeD/binARY DIscs, WhiCh caN resuLt in a misalignMenT betWEen The ciRcumsTellAr (Inner) And cirCumbiNaRy (outer) discs. For Some Cases, the gEneRaTed MiSaligNMents cAn bE laRge ($\gtrsIm 60$ degreES) reSuLTINg From crossing a preceSsION rEsonance BetweeN ThE cIRcumstelLaR diSc anD A Low-maSs coMPaNion (or maSsive pLAnEt) As the syStEm evolVeS. OuR maIn resULts aRe summArised beLow:

1.  We IDentify two secuLAr precession rESoNANcES in gAppEd/binary disC sysTEms. FIrst, A ReSonANce beTween ThE PrECession of the circumsTeLlar anD circUmbinary discs. second, a resONANce betweEn thE PrECession of the ciRcumsTellar disc ANd a low-maSs comPanion reSiding in a GAP between The CirCumSteLLAr And circumbinaRY Disc.\

2.  thE resonaNce Between The CirCumSteLlAr and circUmbinary DiSc CaNnOt lEad to LArge misaLiGnmEnTs aS both DIscs prEcess IndePeNdENtlY, even in “REsONAnce”.\

3.  thE rEsonAncE bEtweeN the CIrcUmstellAr disc and ComPAnioN cAn Lead to sIgnificant misAlIgnments, evEn FroM systeMS That are cLose to being co-planar initIAlly, proVidEd thaT the Resonance CroSsing oCcuRS on the Right tImescAlE. ThIS TypicALLy ReqUiRes that the COMpaNion hAs A masS $\sim 0.01-0.1\,$M$_\odOt$, separation $\sim 10-100\,$AU fOR an Approximately SolAr maSS PrImaRY aND thAt THe cIRCumbinary disc doMinates the AnGUlAr momentum BUdgEt Of the syStem. SucH requIRements Are [*not*]{} satIsfied by gIaNt – of ORDer jupiter masS – planets In “transitIOn” disCS.\

4.  IN numeRicAl calcUlAtiOns of RealisTIc sYstemS we finD mIs
 and still play a role incarving th e cir cum bin ar y di sc.For example, a p plyi ng the results of @Art ymowi cz 1 994i nd icate s an al i gn e d  bi na ry  wi th ma ss ra tio  $q\sim 0.1$, an e cce nt ricity of $\ s im  0.5$ will  tr uncate the c irc umbina ry  di s c bet wee n $3- 4$ tim e s thebinary se pa r ation. HD 1425 2 7 ’s  bin ary separation is $2 0 ^{+17}_{-10}$AU and  e c ce n t ric ity  is $0.5\p m0 .2$;t hus, th e  c o m p ani o n can orbit i n the samep lan e as t he  ci r cumbin ary d is c  an d still tru ncat e the dis c’s du s t compo n ent at$\sim100 $ A U. F u rt he r m on i tor i ng  of the  compani on  s hould  bea b l e  todet ermi ne it s orbital pla ne,  and tes t the  reso nant  s cenar io pre sente dhere.

Summary==== ===

We h ave  s how nthats ecular  pr ece ssion r esonanc e s c an o p er ate in protostella rg a pp ed/binar y disc s ,wh i ch can r es ult  ina misal ignm e nt  between  the c i rc um stellar  ( inner)  a ndcir cumbi n ary(outer ) discs.  Fors ome cases, the generated mis a li g n me n ts c anbe large ($ \gtr s im 6 0$ d e gr ees )  resu lting  f r om crossing a precessi on  reson ancebetween the c ircumstell a r disc and  a l o w- m ass companion(or m assive pla n et) as t he sy stem evo lves. Our m ain resu lts  ar e s umm a r is ed below:

1. We i de ntify t wosecular  pr ece ssi onre sonancesin gappe d/ bi na ry  di sc sy s tems. Fi rs t,ares onanc e  betwe en th e pr ec es s ion  of the ci r c umst el la r an d c ir cumbi nary dis cs. Sec ond, a re son a ncebe tw een the  precession o fthe circum st ell ar dis c and a lo w-mass companion residi n g in agap  betw eenthe circu mst ellarand circum binary  disc .\ 

2 .  Ther e so nan ce  between t h e  ci rcums te llar  and ci rcumbinary disc ca n not  lead to larg e m isal i g nm ent s  a s  bo th dis c s  precess indepe ndently, e ve n  i n “resonan c e”. \
3.  Th e reson anceb etweenthe circu mstellardi sc a n d  co mpanion ca n lead t o signifi c ant m i sa lignm ent s, eve nfro m sys tems t h atare c lose t obeingco-pl an ar initi ally, provided that the  reson ancecro ssing occ urs onthe right  tim escale. Th istyp icall y r e quire s th a tthe compa nion has a mas s  $ \si m 0. 01-0.1\,$M$ _ \ o dot $, se par a tion $ \sim  10-100\,$AU fora n approximatel y so l a r m ass prim ar y and that the  ci rc u m binary d is c dominates  the ang ul a r mom entumbudget  of the s ys t em. Su ch r equ irementsare  [ * not*]{}  s at i sfiedby g ia nt – o f orde r  Jup i t er mass – planet s in“ t ransi t ion ” dis cs .\

4.In n umerical c alculations  of re alis tic s ystemswe  findmis 
 and_still play_a role in carving_the circumbinary_disc._For example,_applying_the results of_@Artymowicz1994 indicates an_aligned binary with mass_ratio $q\sim0.1$, an_eccentricity_of $\sim 0.5$ will truncate the circumbinary disc between $3-4$ times the binary separation._HD 142527’s_binary separation_is_$20^{+17}_{-10}$ AU_and eccentricity is $0.5\pm0.2$; thus,_the companion can orbit in_the same_plane as the circumbinary disc and still truncate_the_disc’s dust component_at $\sim 100$ AU. Further monitoring of the companion should_be able to determine its orbital_plane, and test_the_resonant_scenario presented here.

Summary
=======

We have_shown that secular precession resonances can_operate in protostellar gapped/binary discs, which_can result in a misalignment between the_circumstellar (inner) and circumbinary (outer) discs._For some cases, the generated_misalignments can_be large ($\gtrsim 60$ degrees) resulting_from crossing a_precession resonance_between the circumstellar_disc and a low-mass companion (or_massive planet) as_the system evolves. Our main results_are_summarised below:

1. _We_identify_two secular_precession resonances in_gapped/binary_disc systems._First,_a resonance between the precession of_the_circumstellar and circumbinary discs. Second, a resonance_between the precession of_the_circumstellar disc and a_low-mass companion residing in a_gap between the circumstellar and circumbinary_disc.\

2. _The resonance_between the circumstellar and circumbinary disc cannot lead to large misalignments_as both discs precess independently, even_in “resonance”.\

3.  The_resonance between_the_circumstellar disc and_companion_can lead_to significant misalignments, even from systems that_are close_to being co-planar initially, provided that_the resonance crossing occurs_on_the right timescale. This typically requires_that the companion has a mass_$\sim 0.01-0.1\,$M$_\odot$, separation $\sim 10-100\,$AU_for_an_approximately solar mass primary and_that the circumbinary disc dominates the_angular momentum budget_of the system. Such requirements are [*not*]{}_satisfied_by giant – of order Jupiter_mass_– planets in “transition” discs.\

4. _In_numerical_calculations of realistic systems we_find mis