, we vary $S$-wave parameters to describe 61 energy levels taken from $A_1$ irreps: $[000](16,20,24)$, $[001](20,24)$, $[011](20,24)$, $[111](20,24)$ and $[002](20,24)$. The result, with $\chi^2/N_\mathrm{dof} = 49.1/(61-6) = 0.89$, is:

  ------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------- --
                          $m = $ $(0.2458 \pm 0.0014 \pm 0.0004) \cdot a_t^{-1}$   
                  $g_{\pi K} = $ $(0.156 \pm 0.004 \pm 0.001) \cdot a_t^{-1}$      
                 $g_{\eta K} = $ $( 0.027 \pm 0.008 \pm 0.008) \cdot a_t^{-1}$     
      $\gamma_{\pi K, \pi K} = $ $0.082 \pm 0.046 \pm 0.022$                       
     $\gamma_{\pi K, \eta K} = $ $0.33 \pm 0.13 \pm 0.06$                          
    $\gamma_{\eta K, \eta K} = $ $-0.41 \pm 0.05 \pm 0.07$                         
  ------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------- --

$$\label{global}$$

![image](fig15.pdf){width="57.00000%"}

The phase-shifts and inelasticity corresponding to this fit are shown in Fig. \[fig\_S\_wave\_global\] for the $S$-wave and in Fig. \[fig\_P\_wave\_global\] for the $P$-wave. An alternative approach in which all 80 levels are considered together, varying the $S$ and $P$-wave parameters simultaneously, leads to a solution statistically compatible with the one presented above.

As with the $S$-wave fit using only at-rest points, we find only very weak coupling between the $\pi K$ and $\eta K$ channels, with an apparent weak repulsive interaction in the $\eta K$ channel and a gradual rise in the $\pi K$ phase-shift. As previously we note the rapid rise in the $\pi K$ phase-shift at threshold, followed by a slow increase through $90^\circ$ at higher energies. In Section 
, we vary $ S$-wave parameters to describe 61 energy degree accept from $ A_1 $ irreps: $ [ 000](16,20,24)$, $ [ 001](20,24)$, $ [ 011](20,24)$, $ [ 111](20,24)$ and $ [ 002](20,24)$. The result, with $ \chi^2 / N_\mathrm{dof } = 49.1/(61 - 6) = 0.89 $, is: 

   ------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------- -- 
                           $ m = $ $ (0.2458 \pm 0.0014 \pm 0.0004) \cdot a_t^{-1}$   
                   $ g_{\pi K } = $ $ (0.156 \pm 0.004 \pm 0.001) \cdot a_t^{-1}$      
                  $ g_{\eta potassium } = $ $ (0.027 \pm 0.008 \pm 0.008) \cdot a_t^{-1}$     
       $ \gamma_{\pi K, \pi K } = $ $ 0.082 \pm 0.046 \pm 0.022 $                       
      $ \gamma_{\pi K, \eta K } = $ $ 0.33 \pm 0.13 \pm 0.06 $                          
     $ \gamma_{\eta K, \eta kilobyte } = $ $ -0.41 \pm 0.05 \pm 0.07 $                         
   ------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------- -- 

 $ $ \label{global}$$ 

! [ image](fig15.pdf){width="57.00000% " } 

 The phase - chemise and inelasticity corresponding to this fit are shown in Fig.   \[fig\_S\_wave\_global\ ] for the $ S$-wave and in Fig.   \[fig\_P\_wave\_global\ ] for the $ P$-wave. An alternative overture in which all 80 levels are considered in concert, varying the $ S$ and $ P$-wave parameters simultaneously, lead to a solution statistically compatible with the one presented above. 

 As with the $ S$-wave fit use only at - rest points, we line up only very weak coupling between the $ \pi K$ and $ \eta K$ channels, with an apparent watery repulsive interaction in the $ \eta K$ channel and a gradual rise in the $ \pi K$ phase - shift. As previously we note the rapid raise in the $ \pi K$ phase - shift at threshold, followed by a slow increase through $ 90^\circ$ at high energies. In Section
, we vary $S$-wave parameters tu describe 61 enetgt levens taksn from $X_1$ irreps: $[000](16,20,24)$, $[001](20,24)$, $[011](20,24)$, $[111](20,24)$ and $[002](20,24)$. The result, wuth $\cyi^2/N_\mathrm{dof} = 49.1/(61-6) = 0.89$, is:

  ------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------- --
                          $m = $ $(0.2458 \'j 0.0014 \pm 0.0004) \gbot a_f^{-1}$   
                  $g_{\pi K} = $ $(0.156 \pm 0.004 \pm 0.001) \cdot d_t^{-1}$      
                 $g_{\eta K} = $ $( 0.027 \pm 0.008 \pm 0.008) \cdpt a_t^{-1}$     
      $\damms_{\[i K, \ii K} = $ $0.082 \pm 0.046 \pm 0.022$                       
     $\gamma_{\pi L, \eta K} = $ $0.33 \pm 0.13 \pm 0.06$                          
    $\hamma_{\eta K, \gfa H} = $ $-0.41 \pm 0.05 \pm 0.07$                         
  ------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------- --

$$\label{global}$$

![image](fig15.pdf){widgh="57.00000%"}

The phase-shifjs ajg inelasticmty cogresponding to this fht are xhown in Fig. \[fin\_S\_wavx\_gloval\] for the $S$-wave and in Fig. \[fig\_P\_wave\_glofal\] for tve $P$-wave. An alternarice apkroacv in qhizh zlk 80 leveld ace considersd together, varying the $S$ and $K$-wadv parameters aimultwnqously, leads to a solution statisticallj cojpatible with the one peesented above.

As with the $S$-wavq fit using only at-rest points, we find only very feak rojplnkn begqefn the $\pi K$ and $\eta K$ channels, with an apparegf eesk repulsive ikteraction in the $\rtw L$ channel and x gradbzl rise in the $\pi K$ ohase-shyft. Aw previoufly ee note the rapid rise in tye $\pi K$ phasv-shidt at threshold, foplowed by a sloe inctease through $90^\circ$ at hngher snergies. In Section 
, we vary $S$-wave parameters to describe levels from $A_1$ $[000](16,20,24)$, $[001](20,24)$, $[011](20,24)$, with = 49.1/(61-6) = is: ------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------- $m = $ $(0.2458 \pm 0.0014 0.0004) \cdot a_t^{-1}$ $g_{\pi K} = $ $(0.156 \pm 0.004 \pm 0.001) \cdot $g_{\eta K} = $ $( 0.027 \pm 0.008 \pm 0.008) \cdot a_t^{-1}$ $\gamma_{\pi \pi = $0.082 0.046 \pm 0.022$ $\gamma_{\pi K, \eta K} = $ $0.33 \pm 0.13 \pm 0.06$ $\gamma_{\eta K, K} = $ $-0.41 \pm 0.05 \pm 0.07$ ------------------------------------------------- -- $$\label{global}$$ ![image](fig15.pdf){width="57.00000%"} phase-shifts and inelasticity corresponding to fit shown in \[fig\_S\_wave\_global\] the and in Fig. for the $P$-wave. An alternative approach in which all 80 levels are considered together, varying the $S$ $P$-wave parameters to a statistically with one presented above. the $S$-wave fit using only at-rest only very weak coupling between the $\pi K$ $\eta K$ with an apparent weak repulsive interaction the $\eta K$ channel and a gradual rise the $\pi K$ phase-shift. As previously we note the rapid rise in the $\pi K$ threshold, followed by a increase through $90^\circ$ higher In
, we vary $S$-wave parameters to deScribe 61 enerGy levEls TakEn From $a_1$ irrEps: $[000](16,20,24)$, $[001](20,24)$, $[011](20,24)$, $[111](20,24)$ and $[002](20,24)$. The resulT, With $\Chi^2/N_\mathrm{dof} = 49.1/(61-6) = 0.89$, is:

  ------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------- --
                          $m = $ $(0.2458 \pm 0.0014 \pm 0.0004) \cdOt a_t^{-1}$   
                  $g_{\Pi k} = $ $(0.156 \Pm 0.004 \pm 0.001) \CDoT a_t^{-1}$      
                 $g_{\eTa K} = $ $( 0.027 \pm 0.008 \pm 0.008) \CDoT A_T^{-1}$     
      $\gaMmA_{\pI K, \pI K} = $ $0.082 \PM 0.046 \pM 0.022$                       
     $\gammA_{\pi k, \eta K} = $ $0.33 \pm 0.13 \Pm 0.06$                          
    $\gamma_{\eta k, \etA K} = $ $-0.41 \Pm 0.05 \pm 0.07$                         
  ------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------- --

$$\label{gloBAl}$$

![Image](fig15.pdF){wiDth="57.00000%"}

The phase-sHifTs and iNeLasTIcity CorRespoNding tO This fiT are shown In fIg. \[fig\_S\_WAve\_globAL\] FoR the $s$-wave and in Fig. \[fig\_P\_WAvE\_Global\] for the $P$-wAve. An aLtERnATIve AppRoach in whiCh All 80 leVEls are cONsIDERed TOgether, varyinG the $S$ and $P$-waVE paRameteRs SimULtaneoUsly, lEaDS to A solution stAtisTically coMpatibLE with thE One presEnted aBovE.

As With THe $s$-wAve FiT UsiNG oNly AT-reSt points, We FiNd onlY verY WEAK couPliNg beTween The $\pi K$ and $\eta K$ ChaNnelS, WitH an apParenT weaK rEpulsIve intEractIoN in the $\eta K$ channEl anD a gradual RisE iN thE $\pI K$ phaSE-shift. as pRevIously wE note thE RapId RISE iN the $\pi K$ phase-shift aT tHREsHold, follOwed by A SlOw INcrease tHrOugH $90^\cirC$ AT highEr enERgIes. In SecTion 
, we vary $S$-wave paramet ers to des cribe  61  en er gy l evel s taken from $ A _1$irreps: $[000](16,20,2 4)$,$[ 0 01]( 2 0, 24)$,  $[011] ( 20 , 2 4)$ ,$[ 111 ]( 2 0, 24)$and  $[002] (20,24)$.The  r esult, with$ \c hi^2/N_\ma thr m{dof} = 49. 1/( 61-6)=0.8 9 $, is :
  --- ------ - ------ --------- -- - -- --- - ------- - - -- ---- ----------------- - -- - --------- --
                 $m =  $  $(0. 2 458 \pm 0. 0 0 1 4 \ p m 0.0004) \cd ot a_t^{-1} $   
             $g_{ \p i  K}  = $ $(0.15 6 \p m 0.004 \ pm 0.0 0 1) \cdo t  a_t^{- 1}$    
         $g_ { \e taK } =  $ $( 0. 02 7\pm 0 .008 \ p m  0.0 08)  \cd ot a_ t^{-1}$          $ \ gam ma_{\ pi K,  \pi  K } = $  $0.08 2 \pm  0 .046 \pm 0.022$                  
   $\gamm a_{ \pi  K, \et a K} =$  $0 .3 3 \ pm  0.13 \pm 0.06$                 
  $\gamm a_ {\e ta K , \etaK} = $$-0.41 \ pm 0.0 5  \ pm  0.07$                 
 ----- -------- ----- - ----------- -- - ------------- - -- - - -- - ---- --- ----------- ---- - -- - -

$ $ \l abe l {glob al}$$ 
! [i m age](fig15.pdf){wid th ="57.0 0000% "}

The phase -shifts an d i nelastic ityc or r esponding to t his f it are sho w n in Fig . \[f ig\_S\_w ave\_glob a l \] for t he$S$ -wa vea n din Fig. \[fig \ _ P\_w av e\_glob al\ ] for t he$P$ -wa ve.  A n alterna tive app ro ac hin  wh ich a l l 80 lev el s a re  co nside r ed tog ether , va ry in g  th e $S$ a n d$ P $-wa ve  p aram ete rs  simu ltan e ous ly, lea ds to a s olu t ionst at istical ly compatible  w ith the on epre sented a bove.

A s with the $S$-wave fit using o nly  at-r estpoints, w e f ind on lyv ery we ak cou pling  b etw e e n the $ \p i K $and $\etaK $  ch annel s,  wit h an ap parent weak repuls i veinteraction i n t he $ \ e ta  K$ ch a nne la nda gradual rise in  the $\piK$ ph ase-shift. Aspr eviousl y we no te th e  rapidrise in t he $\pi K $phas e - shi ft at thre shold, f ollowed b y  a sl o wincre ase  throu gh  $9 0^\ci rc$ at hig her e nergie s.  In Se ction  
, we_vary $S$-wave_parameters to describe 61_energy levels_taken_from $A_1$_irreps:_$[000](16,20,24)$, $[001](20,24)$, $[011](20,24)$,_$[111](20,24)$ and $[002](20,24)$._The result, with $\chi^2/N_\mathrm{dof}_= 49.1/(61-6) =_0.89$,_is:

  ------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------- --
         __ ___    _    _ $m_= $ $(0.2458 \pm 0.0014 \pm 0.0004) \cdot_a_t^{-1}$_  
_        _     _  $g_{\pi_K}_=_$ $(0.156 \pm 0.004_\pm 0.001) \cdot a_t^{-1}$  _   
  _      _     _ $g_{\eta K} = $_$( 0.027_\pm 0.008 \pm 0.008) \cdot_a_t^{-1}$  _ _
  _   $\gamma_{\pi K, \pi_K} = $_$0.082 \pm 0.046 \pm 0.022$ __  ___ _  __ __     _
_    $\gamma_{\pi K, \eta_K} = $ $0.33_\pm_0.13 \pm 0.06$ _    _     _ _ _         
 _  $\gamma_{\eta K, \eta K}_= $ $-0.41 \pm_0.05 \pm_0.07$_  __ _      _ _     _   
__------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------- --

$$\label{global}$$

![image](fig15.pdf){width="57.00000%"}

The phase-shifts and inelasticity_corresponding to this fit are shown_in Fig. \[fig\_S\_wave\_global\] for the $S$-wave_and_in_Fig. \[fig\_P\_wave\_global\] for the $P$-wave. An_alternative approach in which all 80_levels are considered_together, varying the $S$ and $P$-wave parameters_simultaneously,_leads to a solution statistically compatible_with_the one presented above.

As with the_$S$-wave_fit_using only at-rest points, we_find only very weak coupling between_the $\pi K$ and $\eta K$ channels, with an_apparent weak repulsive_interaction in the $\eta K$_channel_and_a gradual rise in the $\pi K$ phase-shift. As previously_we note_the rapid rise_in the $\pi K$ phase-shift at threshold, followed by a_slow increase through $90^\circ$ at higher energies._In Section 