wedge j + R_{\bot}^{\alpha\beta}\wedge{\tau _{\alpha\beta}}_{\bot}\nonumber\\
&&\hskip1.5cm -\Gamma _{\bot}^{\alpha\beta}\bigl(\,\vartheta _{[\alpha}\wedge\Sigma ^{\rm matt}_{\beta ]}\bigr)_{\bot} \,\Bigr]\,,\label{energycurrder02}\end{aligned}$$ and finally, comparison of (\[energycurrder02\]) with (\[energycurrder01\]), making use of (\[spincurrconserv\]), yields $${\it l}_u\mathfrak{s} -{{\underline{d}\,q}\over T} = {1\over T}\,\bigl[\,E\wedge j + R_{\bot}^{\alpha\beta}\wedge{\tau _{\alpha\beta}}_{\bot} +\Gamma _{\bot}^{\alpha\beta}\bigl(\,D\,\tau _{\alpha\beta}\bigr)_{\bot}\,\bigr]\,.\label{secondlaw}$$ In the lhs of (\[secondlaw\]) we find the rate of change of the entropy 3-form combined in a familiar way with heat flux and temperature. The interpretation of the first term in the rhs is facilitated by the fact that, according to Ohm’s law $j=\sigma\,{}^\# E$, it is proportional to $E\wedge j ={1\over\sigma} j\wedge{}^\# j \geq 0$, so that it is responsible for entropy growth. The second term is analogous to the first one. If we suppose that all terms in the rhs of (\[secondlaw\]) are $\geq 0$, or, in any case, for vanishing macroscopic free spin current $\tau _{\alpha\beta}$, we can consider (\[secondlaw\]) to be a particular realization of the second law of thermodynamics.

On the other hand, the first law is no other than the conservation equation (\[emmattender\]) for matter energy, rewritten as (\[diff01\]) in terms of the internal energy current 3-form (\[intenergycurr01\]). This reformulation is necessary in order to bring to light the components of $\epsilon ^{\rm u}$ defined in (\[intenergycurr02\]), that is, heat flux and internal energy respectively, thus making possible to compare the first law with the second one (\[secondlaw\]) deduced above. (By the way, notice that the inversion of (\[intenergycurr01\]) to express $\epsilon ^{\rm matt}$ in terms of $\epsilon ^{\rm u}$ suggests to interpret $\epsilon ^{\rm matt}$ as
wedge j + R_{\bot}^{\alpha\beta}\wedge{\tau _ { \alpha\beta}}_{\bot}\nonumber\\ 
 & & \hskip1.5 cm -\Gamma _ { \bot}^{\alpha\beta}\bigl(\,\vartheta _ { [ \alpha}\wedge\Sigma ^{\rm matt}_{\beta ] } \bigr)_{\bot } \,\Bigr]\,,\label{energycurrder02}\end{aligned}$$ and finally, comparison of (\[energycurrder02\ ]) with (\[energycurrder01\ ]), making use of (\[spincurrconserv\ ]), yields $ $ { \it l}_u\mathfrak{s } -{{\underline{d}\,q}\over metric ton } = { 1\over T}\,\bigl[\,E\wedge j + R_{\bot}^{\alpha\beta}\wedge{\tau _ { \alpha\beta}}_{\bot } + \Gamma _ { \bot}^{\alpha\beta}\bigl(\,D\,\tau _ { \alpha\beta}\bigr)_{\bot}\,\bigr]\,.\label{secondlaw}$$ In the luteinizing hormone of (\[secondlaw\ ]) we find the rate of variety of the entropy 3 - form combine in a familiar room with estrus flux and temperature. The interpretation of the first term in the releasing hormone is facilitated by the fact that, according to Ohm ’s jurisprudence $ j=\sigma\,{}^\ # E$, it is proportional to $ E\wedge j = { 1\over\sigma } j\wedge{}^\ # j \geq 0 $, so that it is responsible for entropy growth. The second term is analogous to the inaugural one. If we suppose that all terms in the rhs of (\[secondlaw\ ]) are $ \geq 0 $, or, in any character, for vanishing macroscopic free spin current $ \tau _ { \alpha\beta}$, we can consider (\[secondlaw\ ]) to be a especial realization of the second law of thermodynamics. 

 On the other hand, the first law is no early than the conservation equation (\[emmattender\ ]) for matter energy, rewritten as (\[diff01\ ]) in terms of the internal department of energy current 3 - kind (\[intenergycurr01\ ]). This reformulation is necessary in order to bring to light the components of $ \epsilon ^{\rm u}$ defined in (\[intenergycurr02\ ]), that is, heat flux and internal energy respectively, therefore create possible to compare the beginning jurisprudence with the second one (\[secondlaw\ ]) deduced above. (By the way, notice that the anastrophe of (\[intenergycurr01\ ]) to express $ \epsilon ^{\rm matt}$ in term of $ \epsilon ^{\rm u}$ suggests to interpret $ \epsilon ^{\rm matt}$ as
wedhe j + R_{\bot}^{\alpha\beta}\wedge{\uau _{\alpha\beta}}_{\bot}\nonumber\\
&&\iskip1.5cm -\Gamma _{\but}^{\alpha\beta}\bigl(\,\vartheta _{[\alphe}\wedte\Signa ^{\rm matt}_{\beta ]}\bigr)_{\bot} \,\Bigr]\,,\labep{energycyrrdtr02}\end{aligned}$$ and hjnally, gjmpadlson mh (\[energycurrder02\]) with (\[enercycurrder01\]), makitg ude of (\[spincurrconserv\]), yields $${\it l}_u\mwthfrak{x} -{{\knderline{d}\,q}\ovet T} = {1\pder F}\,\bigl[\,E\wedge j + R_{\bot}^{\alpha\beta}\wedge{\tzu _{\alphe\beta}}_{\bot} +\Gamma _{\not}^{\alpha\beta}\bigl(\,D\,\tau _{\alpha\heta}\higr)_{\bot}\,\bigr]\,.\label{sefondlaw}$$ In jge jys of (\[seconduaw\]) we find the rate or change of the entropy 3-form coobineb in a famioiqr ady with heav flux and temperablre. The interptetation of thc firvt rerm in the rhs is farilitated by the facj that, accmrbing to Ohm’s law $j=\signa\,{}^\# E$, it is [ropuetiunam vo $S\wedge j ={1\kver\sigma} n\wedge{}^\# j \gew 0$, so that it is rexpjbsible for enfropy drjwth. The second term is analogous to tht firat one. If we suppose thqt all terms in the rjs of (\[secjndlaw\]) are $\geq 0$, or, in any case, for vanishing macrmscopmc frte spin xugrent $\tau _{\alpha\beta}$, we can consider (\[secondlaw\]) fo bv a particular reclization of the sfcpgd law of thetmodynamica.

On the other hand, the fitst laq is no ouher yhan the conservation equatuon (\[emmattenber\]) for matter energy, rewritten cs (\[difg01\]) in yerms of the internal euergy durrent 3-forl (\[intenerfhcurr01\]). This reforoulsthon is ntzessary in order eo bring vo liyht the zomppnents of $\epsiloj ^{\rm m}$ defined in (\[inteneggycutr02\]), thad is, heat vlux and internal energy respecvmvely, thus malitg iossible co comiare the first jaw with the sgcond one (\[secovdlaw\]) dedubed above. (By the way, notice that dje inversion of (\[integergtcure01\]) to exofess $\epsilon ^{\rk matt}$ in terms of $\wpsilon ^{\rm u}$ suggexts fo interpret $\epwilin ^{\rm matt}$ as
wedge j + R_{\bot}^{\alpha\beta}\wedge{\tau _{\alpha\beta}}_{\bot}\nonumber\\ &&\hskip1.5cm -\Gamma ^{\rm ]}\bigr)_{\bot} \,\Bigr]\,,\label{energycurrder02}\end{aligned}$$ finally, comparison of of yields $${\it l}_u\mathfrak{s} T} = {1\over j + R_{\bot}^{\alpha\beta}\wedge{\tau _{\alpha\beta}}_{\bot} +\Gamma _{\bot}^{\alpha\beta}\bigl(\,D\,\tau In the lhs of (\[secondlaw\]) we find the rate of change of the 3-form combined in a familiar way with heat flux and temperature. The interpretation the term the is facilitated by the fact that, according to Ohm’s law $j=\sigma\,{}^\# E$, it is proportional to j ={1\over\sigma} j\wedge{}^\# j \geq 0$, so that is responsible for entropy The second term is analogous the one. If suppose all in the rhs (\[secondlaw\]) are $\geq 0$, or, in any case, for vanishing macroscopic free spin current $\tau _{\alpha\beta}$, we consider (\[secondlaw\]) a particular of second of thermodynamics. On hand, the first law is no conservation equation (\[emmattender\]) for matter energy, rewritten as in terms the internal energy current 3-form (\[intenergycurr01\]). reformulation is necessary in order to bring to the components of $\epsilon ^{\rm u}$ defined in (\[intenergycurr02\]), that is, heat flux and internal thus making possible to the first law the one deduced (By the notice that the inversion of (\[intenergycurr01\]) to express $\epsilon ^{\rm matt}$ terms of $\epsilon ^{\rm u}$ suggests to interpret $\epsilon ^{\rm
wedge j + R_{\bot}^{\alpha\beta}\wedge{\tAu _{\alpha\betA}}_{\bot}\nOnuMbeR\\
&&\hSkip1.5Cm -\GaMma _{\bot}^{\alpha\betA}\Bigl(\,\Vartheta _{[\alpha}\wedge\SigmA ^{\rm maTt}_{\BEta ]}\bIGr)_{\Bot} \,\BiGr]\,,\label{ENeRGYcuRrDeR02}\enD{aLIgNed}$$ anD fiNally, coMparison of (\[EneRgYcurrder02\]) with (\[ENeRgycurrder01\]), MakIng use of (\[spinCurRconseRv\]), YieLDs $${\it l}_U\maThfraK{s} -{{\undeRLine{d}\,q}\Over T} = {1\over t}\,\bIGl[\,E\wedGE j + R_{\bot}^{\aLPHa\Beta}\Wedge{\tau _{\alpha\beta}}_{\BOt} +\gAmma _{\bot}^{\alpha\beTa}\bigl(\,d\,\tAU _{\aLPHa\bEta}\Bigr)_{\bot}\,\bigR]\,.\lAbel{sECondlaw}$$ iN tHE LHs oF (\[Secondlaw\]) we fiNd the rate of CHanGe of thE eNtrOPy 3-form CombiNeD In a Familiar way With Heat flux aNd tempERature. THE interpRetatiOn oF thE firST tErM in ThE Rhs IS fAciLItaTed by the FaCt That, aCcorDING To OhM’s lAw $j=\sIgma\,{}^\# E$, It is proportioNal To $E\wEDge J ={1\over\Sigma} J\wedGe{}^\# J \geq 0$, sO that iT is reSpOnsible for entroPy grOwth. The seConD tErm Is AnaloGOus to tHe fIrsT one. If wE supposE ThaT aLL TErMs in the rhs of (\[secondLaW\]) ARe $\Geq 0$, or, in aNy case, FOr VaNIshing maCrOscOpic FREe spiN curREnT $\tau _{\alphA\beta}$, wE CaN cOnsider (\[SeCondlaW\]) tO be A paRticuLAr reAlizatIon of the SeconD Law of thermodynAMics.

On the otheR HaND, ThE FirsT laW is no other tHan tHE conServATiOn eQUatioN (\[emmaTtENdER\]) for matter energy, rewRiTten as (\[Diff01\]) iN terms of the inTernal enerGY CUrrent 3-foRm (\[inTEnERgycurr01\]). This refOrmulAtion is necESsary in oRder tO bring to Light the cOMPonents oF $\epSilOn ^{\rM u}$ dEFInEd in (\[intenergyCURr02\]), thAt Is, heat fLux And inteRnaL enErgY reSpEctively, tHus makinG pOsSiBlE to CompaRE the firsT lAw wItH thE secoND one (\[seCondlAw\]) deDuCeD AboVe. (By the WAy, NOTice ThAt The iNveRsIon of (\[InteNErgYcurr01\]) to Express $\epSilON ^{\rm mAtT}$ iN terms oF $\epsilon ^{\rm u}$ suGgEsts to inteRpRet $\EpsiloN ^{\RM matt}$ as
wedge j + R_{\bot}^{\alpha \beta}\wed ge{\t au_{\ al pha\ beta }}_{\bot}\nonu m ber\ \
&&\hskip1.5cm -\Gamm a _{\ bo t }^{\ a lp ha\be ta}\big l (\ , \ var th et a _ {[ \ al pha}\ wed ge\Sigm a ^{\rm ma tt} _{ \beta ]}\big r )_ {\bot} \,\ Big r]\,,\label{ ene rgycur rd er0 2 }\end {al igned }$$ an d  final ly, compa ri s on of( \[energ y c ur rder 02\]) with (\[ene r gy c urrder01\]), m akingus e  o f (\[ spi ncurrconse rv \]),y ields $ $ {\ i t l}_ u \mathfrak{s}-{{\underli n e{d }\,q}\ ov erT } = {1 \over  T } \,\ bigl[\,E\we dgej + R_{\b ot}^{\ a lpha\be t a}\wedg e{\tau  _{ \al pha\ b et a} }_{ \b o t}+ \G amm a  _{ \bot}^{\ al ph a\bet a}\b i g l ( \,D\ ,\t au _ {\alp ha\beta}\bigr )_{ \bot } \,\ bigr] \,.\l abel {s econd law}$$  In t he  lhs of (\[seco ndla w\]) we f ind  t hera te of change  of  th e entro py 3-fo r m c om b i n ed  in a familiar way  w i t hheat flu x andt em pe r ature. T he  in terp r e tatio n of th e firstterm i n  t he  rhs is  f acilit at edbythe f a ct t hat, a ccording  to O h m’s law $j=\si g ma\,{}^\# E$, it i sp ropo rti onal to $E\ wedg e  j = {1\o v er \si g ma} j \wedg e{ } ^\ #  j \geq 0$, so that  i t is r espon sible for ent ropy growt h . The seco nd t e rm is analogous t o the  first one .  If we s uppos e that a ll termsi n  the rhs  of  (\ [se con d l aw \]) are $\geq 0 $, o r,  in any  ca se, for  va nis hin g m ac roscopicfree spi ncu rr en t $ \tau_ {\alpha\ be ta} $,  we  canc onside r (\[ seco nd la w \])  to bea  p a r ticu la rreal iza ti on of  the sec ond law  of therm ody n amic s. 
On theother hand, t he  first law  i s n o othe r than the  conservation equation( \[emmat ten der\] ) fo r matterene rgy, r ewr i tten a s (\[d iff01 \] ) i n terms o fthe  i nternal en e r gycurre nt  3-f orm (\[ intenergycurr01\]) .  Th is reformulat ion  isn e ce ssa r yi n o rd e r t o bring to lightthe compon en t sof $\epsil o n ^ {\ rm u}$defined  in ( \ [intene rgycurr02 \]), that  i s, h e a t f lux and in ternal e nergy res p ectiv e ly , thu s m akingpo ssi ble t o comp a rethe f irst l aw  withthe s ec ond one(\[secondlaw\]) deduced  above . (By  th e way, no tic e  th at the in vers ion of (\[ int ene rgycu rr0 1 \]) t o ex p re ss$ \epsi lon^ {\rm matt } $int e rm s of $\epsi l o n  ^{ \rm u }$s uggest s to  interpret $\epsi l on ^{\rm matt} $ as 
wedge j_+ R_{\bot}^{\alpha\beta}\wedge{\tau__{\alpha\beta}}_{\bot}\nonumber\\
&&\hskip1.5cm -\Gamma _{\bot}^{\alpha\beta}\bigl(\,\vartheta _{[\alpha}\wedge\Sigma_^{\rm matt}_{\beta_]}\bigr)_{\bot}_\,\Bigr]\,,\label{energycurrder02}\end{aligned}$$ and_finally,_comparison of (\[energycurrder02\])_with (\[energycurrder01\]), making_use of (\[spincurrconserv\]), yields_$${\it l}_u\mathfrak{s} -{{\underline{d}\,q}\over_T}_= {1\over T}\,\bigl[\,E\wedge j + R_{\bot}^{\alpha\beta}\wedge{\tau _{\alpha\beta}}_{\bot} +\Gamma _{\bot}^{\alpha\beta}\bigl(\,D\,\tau _{\alpha\beta}\bigr)_{\bot}\,\bigr]\,.\label{secondlaw}$$ In the lhs of_(\[secondlaw\])_we find_the_rate_of change of the entropy_3-form combined in a familiar_way with_heat flux and temperature. The interpretation of the_first_term in the_rhs is facilitated by the fact that, according to_Ohm’s law $j=\sigma\,{}^\# E$, it is_proportional to $E\wedge_j_={1\over\sigma}_j\wedge{}^\# j \geq 0$,_so that it is responsible for_entropy growth. The second term is_analogous to the first one. If we_suppose that all terms in the_rhs of (\[secondlaw\]) are $\geq_0$, or,_in any case, for vanishing_macroscopic free spin_current $\tau__{\alpha\beta}$, we can_consider (\[secondlaw\]) to be a particular_realization of the_second law of thermodynamics.

On the other_hand,_the first law_is_no_other than_the conservation equation_(\[emmattender\])_for matter_energy,_rewritten as (\[diff01\]) in terms of_the_internal energy current 3-form (\[intenergycurr01\]). This reformulation_is necessary in order_to_bring to light the_components of $\epsilon ^{\rm u}$_defined in (\[intenergycurr02\]), that is, heat_flux and_internal energy_respectively, thus making possible to compare the first law with the_second one (\[secondlaw\]) deduced above. (By_the way, notice that_the inversion_of_(\[intenergycurr01\]) to express_$\epsilon_^{\rm matt}$_in terms of $\epsilon ^{\rm u}$ suggests_to interpret_$\epsilon ^{\rm matt}$ as