 and integrate over $t$ to find $E_{\rm fb}$ as

$$E_{\rm fb} =  \dfrac{3}{5}  \left( \dfrac{4 \pi \rho_{\rm c} }{3} \right)^{1/3} G (M_{\rm c})^{5/3},$$

where we have assumed that all of the gravitational potential energy is liberated instantaneously. We can then study this feedback energy as a fraction of the total energy of the protoplanet from Equation \[eq:binding\],

$$\dfrac{E_{\rm fb}}{E_{\rm tot}} 
= 1.3 \left(\dfrac{\rho_{\rm c}}{5 \rm gcm^{-3}}\right)^{1/3} \left(\dfrac{M_{\rm c}}{20 M_{\oplus}}\right)^{5/3} \left( \dfrac{r_{\rm p}}{1 \rm AU}\right) \left( \dfrac{5 M_{J}}{M_{p}}\right)^2
\label{eq:feedback}$$

or alternatively,

$$\dfrac{E_{\rm fb}}{E_{\rm tot}} = \left( \dfrac{M_{\rm c}}{M_{\rm p}} \right)^2 \dfrac{ r_{\rm p}}{r_{\rm c}}.
    \label{eq:fb_simple}$$

Let us consider a protoplanet with $M_{\rm p} = 5M_J$, $
r_{\rm p}$ = 1 AU, and a rocky core with mass $M_{\rm c}=M_\oplus$ and $\rho_{\rm c}$ = 5 gcm$^{-3}$. Equation \[eq:feedback\] gives us a value of $\sim$ 0.008, far too small to disrupt the protoplanet. However, if we allow the core to grow to 20 $M_\oplus$ [Jupiter’s core mass is now believed to be $\sim 10 M_{\oplus}$; @WahlEtal17; @Nettelmann17; @GuillotEtal18], we get a value of 1.3. This result is exciting since it shows us that reasonably modest cores have the potential to destroy young GI protoplanets. Figure \[fig:an\_feedback\] illustrates Equation \[eq:feedback\] for a 5 $M_J$ protoplanet with two different assumptions for the initial radius. In the remainder of this paper we demonstrate the
and integrate over $ t$ to find $ E_{\rm fb}$ as 

 $ $ E_{\rm fb } =   \dfrac{3}{5 }   \left (\dfrac{4 \pi \rho_{\rm c } } { 3 } \right)^{1/3 } G (M_{\rm c})^{5/3},$$ 

 where we have assumed that all of the gravitational likely department of energy is release instantaneously. We can then study this feedback department of energy as a fraction of the total department of energy of the protoplanet from Equation \[eq: binding\ ], 

 $ $ \dfrac{E_{\rm fb}}{E_{\rm tot } } 
 = 1.3 \left(\dfrac{\rho_{\rm c}}{5 \rm gcm^{-3}}\right)^{1/3 } \left(\dfrac{M_{\rm c}}{20 M_{\oplus}}\right)^{5/3 } \left (\dfrac{r_{\rm p}}{1 \rm AU}\right) \left (\dfrac{5 M_{J}}{M_{p}}\right)^2 
 \label{eq: feedback}$$ 

 or alternatively, 

 $ $ \dfrac{E_{\rm fb}}{E_{\rm tot } } = \left (\dfrac{M_{\rm c}}{M_{\rm p } } \right)^2 \dfrac { r_{\rm p}}{r_{\rm c } }. 
     \label{eq: fb_simple}$$ 

 Let us regard a protoplanet with $ M_{\rm phosphorus } = 5M_J$, $ 
 r_{\rm p}$ = 1 AU, and a rocky core with mass $ M_{\rm c}=M_\oplus$ and $ \rho_{\rm c}$ = 5 gcm$^{-3}$. Equation \[eq: feedback\ ] gives us a value of $ \sim$ 0.008, far besides small to disrupt the protoplanet. However, if we leave the core to grow to 20 $ M_\oplus$ [ Jupiter ’s core mass is now believed to be $ \sim 10 M_{\oplus}$; @WahlEtal17; @Nettelmann17; @GuillotEtal18 ], we get a value of 1.3. This consequence is exciting since it shows us that reasonably modest kernel have the potential to destroy young gilbert protoplanets. Figure \[fig: an\_feedback\ ] illustrate Equation \[eq: feedback\ ] for a 5 $ M_J$ protoplanet with two different assumptions for the initial radius. In the end of this paper we demonstrate the
 anf integrate over $t$ to fikd $E_{\rm fb}$ as

$$E_{\rm yv} =  \dfcac{3}{5}  \lert( \dfrac{4 \pi \rho_{\rm c} }{3} \right)^{1/3} G (M_{\rm c})^{5/3},$$

whxre qe hace assumed that all of the gravptational pottntial energy is liberated instzktanemnsly. We can thek study thiv feedback enesgh cs a fraction of the total energy of the prptlplanet from Ezuatpog \[eq:gpnbing\],

$$\dfrac{E_{\rm fb}}{E_{\rm tot}} 
= 1.3 \left(\dfdac{\rho_{\rk c}}{5 \rm gcm^{-3}}\rignt)^{1/3} \left(\dfrac{M_{\rm c}}{20 M_{\oplus}}\rihht)^{5/3} \peft( \dfrac{r_{\rm p}}{1 \rm AU}\right) \ledt( \dseac{5 M_{J}}{M_{p}}\righg)^2
\label{eq:fetdyack}$$

or altetnatively,

$$\dfrac{E_{\rm fb}}{E_{\rm tot}} = \lefg( \dfrcc{M_{\rm c}}{M_{\rm k}} \dihvt)^2 \dfrac{ r_{\rn p}}{r_{\ri c}}.
    \label{ca:fb_sim[le}$$

Let is consider a iroto'lanwt with $M_{\rm p} = 5M_J$, $
r_{\rm p}$ = 1 AU, and a rocki core witv jass $M_{\rm c}=M_\oplus$ qne $\rho_{\tm c}$ = 5 gco$^{-3}$. Eqjatjoi \[es:feedbwck\] gives us z value of $\wim$ 0.008, far too small uo qpxrupt the prktoplagee. However, if we allow the core to grow uo 20 $M_\kplus$ [Jupiter’s core masw is now believed to he $\sim 10 M_{\jplus}$; @WahlEtal17; @Nettelmann17; @GuillotEtal18], we get a vanue oh 1.3. Thnw resjot is exciting since it shows us that reasonablr mpdvst cores have thc potential to desyrly ioung GI protoklanets. Fifure \[fig:an\_feedback\] illusttates Wquation \[tq:feecback\] for a 5 $M_J$ protoplanet with two diyfeeent assumptions flr the initnal racius. On the remainder of thir paler we demojstrate tgd
and integrate over $t$ to find $E_{\rm $$E_{\rm = \dfrac{3}{5} \dfrac{4 \pi \rho_{\rm c})^{5/3},$$ we have assumed all of the potential energy is liberated instantaneously. We then study this feedback energy as a fraction of the total energy of protoplanet from Equation \[eq:binding\], $$\dfrac{E_{\rm fb}}{E_{\rm tot}} = 1.3 \left(\dfrac{\rho_{\rm c}}{5 \rm gcm^{-3}}\right)^{1/3} c}}{20 \left( p}}{1 AU}\right) \left( \dfrac{5 M_{J}}{M_{p}}\right)^2 \label{eq:feedback}$$ or alternatively, $$\dfrac{E_{\rm fb}}{E_{\rm tot}} = \left( \dfrac{M_{\rm c}}{M_{\rm p}} \right)^2 r_{\rm p}}{r_{\rm c}}. \label{eq:fb_simple}$$ Let us consider a with $M_{\rm p} = $ r_{\rm p}$ = 1 and rocky core mass c}=M_\oplus$ $\rho_{\rm c}$ = gcm$^{-3}$. Equation \[eq:feedback\] gives us a value of $\sim$ 0.008, far too small to disrupt the protoplanet. if we core to to $M_\oplus$ core mass is to be $\sim 10 M_{\oplus}$; @WahlEtal17; get a value of 1.3. This result is since it us that reasonably modest cores have potential to destroy young GI protoplanets. Figure \[fig:an\_feedback\] Equation \[eq:feedback\] for a 5 $M_J$ protoplanet with two different assumptions for the initial radius. remainder of this paper demonstrate the
 and integrate over $t$ to find $E_{\rM fb}$ as

$$E_{\rm fb} =  \Dfrac{3}{5}  \LefT( \dfRaC{4 \pi \rHo_{\rm C} }{3} \right)^{1/3} G (M_{\rm c})^{5/3},$$

wheRE we hAve assumed that all of the GraviTaTIonaL PoTentiAl energY Is LIBerAtEd InsTaNTaNeousLy. WE can theN study this FeeDbAck energy as a FRaCtion of the TotAl energy of thE prOtoplaNeT frOM EquaTioN \[eq:biNding\],

$$\dFRac{E_{\rm Fb}}{E_{\rm tot}} 
= 1.3 \lEfT(\Dfrac{\rHO_{\rm c}}{5 \rm gCM^{-3}}\RiGht)^{1/3} \lEft(\dfrac{M_{\rm c}}{20 M_{\opluS}}\RiGHt)^{5/3} \left( \dfrac{r_{\rm P}}{1 \rm AU}\rIgHT) \lEFT( \dfRac{5 m_{J}}{M_{p}}\right)^2
\lAbEl{eq:fEEdback}$$

oR AlTERNatIVely,

$$\dfrac{E_{\rm fB}}{E_{\rm tot}} = \left( \DFraC{M_{\rm c}}{M_{\Rm P}} \riGHt)^2 \dfraC{ r_{\rm p}}{R_{\rM C}}.
    \laBel{eq:fb_simpLe}$$

LeT us considEr a proTOplanet WIth $M_{\rm p} = 5m_J$, $
r_{\rm p}$ = 1 aU, aNd a RockY CoRe WitH mASs $M_{\RM c}=m_\opLUs$ aNd $\rho_{\rm c}$ = 5 GcM$^{-3}$. EQuatiOn \[eq:FEEDBack\] GivEs us A valuE of $\sim$ 0.008, far too sMalL to dISruPt the ProtoPlanEt. howevEr, if we Allow ThE core to grow to 20 $M_\oPlus$ [jupiter’s cOre MaSs iS nOw belIEved to Be $\sIm 10 M_{\Oplus}$; @WaHlEtal17; @NETteLmANN17; @guIllotEtal18], we get a valUe OF 1.3. thIs result Is exciTInG sINce it shoWs Us tHat rEASonabLy moDEsT cores haVe the pOTeNtIal to deStRoy youNg gI pRotOplanETs. FiGure \[fiG:an\_feedbAck\] ilLUstrates EquatiON \[eq:feedback\] foR A 5 $M_j$ PRoTOplaNet With two diffErenT AssuMptiONs For THe iniTial rAdIUs. iN the remainder of this PaPer we dEmonsTrate the
 and integrate over $t$ to  find $E_{ \rm f b}$  as 
$$E_ {\rm  fb} =  \dfrac { 3}{5 }  \left( \dfrac{4 \pi  \rho _{ \ rm c }  } {3} \ right)^ { 1/ 3 }  G(M _{ \rm  c } )^ {5/3} ,$$ 

where  we have a ssu me d that all o f  t he gravita tio nal potentia l e nergyis  li b erate d i nstan taneou s ly. We  can then  s t udy th i s feedb a c kener gy as a fractiono ft he total energ y of t he pr o t opl ane t from Equ at ion \ [ eq:bind i ng \ ] , 

$ $ \dfrac{E_{\rm  fb}}{E_{\r m  to t}} 
=  1 .3\ left(\ dfrac {\ r ho_ {\rm c}}{5\rmgcm^{-3}} \right ) ^{1/3}\ left(\d frac{M _{\ rmc}}{ 2 0M_ {\o pl u s}} \ ri ght ) ^{5 /3} \lef t(  \ dfrac {r_{ \ r m p}}{ 1 \ rm A U}\ri ght) \left( \ dfr ac{5 M_{ J}}{M _{p}} \rig ht )^2
\ label{ eq:fe ed back}$$

or alt erna tively,
$$\ df rac {E _{\rm fb}}{E _{\ rmtot}} =  \left( \df ra c { M _{ \rm c}}{M_{\rm p}}  \ r i gh t)^2 \df rac{ r _ {\ rm p}}{r_{\ rm  c} }.
 \lab el{e q :f b_simple }$$

L e tus  consid er  a pro to pla net  with $M_{ \rm p}  = 5M_J$ , $
r _ {\rm p}$ = 1 A U , and a rocky co r e  w i th m ass  $M_{\rm c} =M_\ o plus $ an d  $ \rh o _{\rm  c}$=5  g c m$^{-3}$. Equation\[ eq:fee dback \] gives us a  value of$ \ s im$ 0.00 8, f a rt oo small to di srupt  the proto p lanet. H oweve r, if we  allow th e core togro w t o 2 0 $ M _ \o plus$ [Jupite r ’ s co re  mass i s n ow beli eve d t o b e $ \s im 10 M_{ \oplus}$ ;@W ah lE tal 17; @ N ettelman n1 7;@G uil lotEt a l18],we ge t ava lu e  of  1.3. T h is r esul tis  exc iti ng  sinc e it sho ws us t hat reaso nab l y mo de st  coreshave the pote nt ial to des tr oyyoungG I  protopl anets. Figure \[fig:an\ _ feedbac k\]  illu stra tes Equat ion  \[eq: fee d back\]  for a  5 $M _J $ p r o topla n e twit htwo differ e n t a ssump ti onsfor the  initial radius. I n  th e remainder o f t hisp a pe r w e  d e mon st r ate t he
 and_integrate over_$t$ to find $E_{\rm_fb}$ as

$$E_{\rm_fb}_= _\dfrac{3}{5}_ \left( \dfrac{4_\pi \rho_{\rm c}_}{3} \right)^{1/3} G (M_{\rm_c})^{5/3},$$

where we have_assumed_that all of the gravitational potential energy is liberated instantaneously. We can then study_this_feedback energy_as_a_fraction of the total energy_of the protoplanet from Equation_\[eq:binding\],

$$\dfrac{E_{\rm fb}}{E_{\rm_tot}} 
= 1.3 \left(\dfrac{\rho_{\rm c}}{5 \rm gcm^{-3}}\right)^{1/3} \left(\dfrac{M_{\rm_c}}{20_M_{\oplus}}\right)^{5/3} \left( \dfrac{r_{\rm_p}}{1 \rm AU}\right) \left( \dfrac{5 M_{J}}{M_{p}}\right)^2
\label{eq:feedback}$$

or alternatively,

$$\dfrac{E_{\rm fb}}{E_{\rm tot}}_= \left( \dfrac{M_{\rm c}}{M_{\rm p}} \right)^2_\dfrac{ r_{\rm p}}{r_{\rm_c}}.
__  \label{eq:fb_simple}$$

Let us_consider a protoplanet with $M_{\rm p}_= 5M_J$, $
r_{\rm p}$ = 1_AU, and a rocky core with mass_$M_{\rm c}=M_\oplus$ and $\rho_{\rm c}$ =_5 gcm$^{-3}$. Equation \[eq:feedback\] gives_us a_value of $\sim$ 0.008, far_too small to_disrupt the_protoplanet. However, if_we allow the core to grow_to 20 $M_\oplus$_[Jupiter’s core mass is now believed_to_be $\sim 10_M_{\oplus}$;_@WahlEtal17;_@Nettelmann17; @GuillotEtal18],_we get a_value_of 1.3._This_result is exciting since it shows_us_that reasonably modest cores have the potential_to destroy young GI_protoplanets._Figure \[fig:an\_feedback\] illustrates Equation_\[eq:feedback\] for a 5 $M_J$_protoplanet with two different assumptions for_the initial_radius. In_the remainder of this paper we demonstrate the