 t\leq T$.}$$

Hence, if we introduce for $1<p\leq +\infty$ the spaces $$L^p(\nu):=\left\{u,\ \text{$\mathcal E$-measurable, such that $u\in L^p(\nu_t)$ for all $0\leq t\leq T$}\right\},$$ then $j$ is well defined on $L^2(\nu)\cap L^\infty(\nu)$. We now give our quadratic growth assumption on $g$.

\[assump:hquad\]\[Quadratic growth\]

[(i)]{} For fixed $(y,z,u)$, $g$ is $\mathbb{F}$-progressively measurable.

[(ii)]{} For any $p\geq 1$ $$\label{inte}
\underset{\tau\in\mathcal T_0^T}{\esup^\mathbb P}\ \mathbb E_\tau\left[\left(\int_\tau^T{\left|g_t(0,0,0)\right|}dt\right)^p\right]<+\infty, \ \mathbb P-a.s.$$

[(iii)]{} $g$ has the following growth property. There exists $(\beta,\gamma)\in \mathbb R_+\times \mathbb R^*_+$ and a positive predictable process $\alpha$ satisfying the same integrability condition as $g_t(0,0,0)$, such that for all $(\omega,t,y,z,u)$ $$\begin{aligned}
 -\alpha_t-\beta{\left|y\right|}-\frac\gamma2{\left|z\right|}^2-\frac{j_t(-\gamma u)}{\gamma} \leq g_t(\omega,y,z,u)-g_t(0,0,0)\leq \alpha_t+\beta{\left|y\right|}+\frac\gamma2{\left|z\right|}^2+\frac{j_t(\gamma u)}{\gamma}.\label{eq_quadratique}\end{aligned}$$

\[remrem\] We emphasize that unlike the usual quadratic growth assumptions for continuous BSDEs, condition is not symmetric. It is mainly due to the fact that unlike the functions ${\left|.\right|}$ and ${\left|.\right|}^2$, the function $j$ is not even. Moreover, with this non-symmetric condition, it is easily seen that if
t\leq T$.}$$ 

 Hence, if we introduce for $ 1 < p\leq + \infty$ the spaces $ $ L^p(\nu):=\left\{u,\ \text{$\mathcal E$-measurable, such that $ u\in L^p(\nu_t)$ for all $ 0\leq t\leq T$}\right\},$$ then $ j$ is well defined on $ L^2(\nu)\cap L^\infty(\nu)$. We nowadays contribute our quadratic growth assumption on $ g$. 

 \[assump: hquad\]\[Quadratic growth\ ] 

 [ (i) ] { } For fasten $ (y, z, u)$, $ g$ is $ \mathbb{F}$-progressively measurable. 

 [ (ii) ] { } For any $ p\geq 1 $ $ $ \label{inte } 
 \underset{\tau\in\mathcal T_0^T}{\esup^\mathbb P}\ \mathbb E_\tau\left[\left(\int_\tau^T{\left|g_t(0,0,0)\right|}dt\right)^p\right]<+\infty, \ \mathbb P - a.s.$$ 

 [ (iii) ] { } $ g$ has the surveil growth property. There exist $ (\beta,\gamma)\in \mathbb R_+\times \mathbb R^*_+$ and a positive predictable process $ \alpha$ meet the same integrability condition as $ g_t(0,0,0)$, such that for all $ (\omega, t, y, z, u)$ $ $ \begin{aligned } 
  -\alpha_t-\beta{\left|y\right|}-\frac\gamma2{\left|z\right|}^2-\frac{j_t(-\gamma u)}{\gamma } \leq g_t(\omega, y, z, u)-g_t(0,0,0)\leq \alpha_t+\beta{\left|y\right|}+\frac\gamma2{\left|z\right|}^2+\frac{j_t(\gamma u)}{\gamma}.\label{eq_quadratique}\end{aligned}$$ 

 \[remrem\ ] We stress that unlike the usual quadratic growth assumptions for continuous BSDEs, condition is not symmetric. It is chiefly due to the fact that unlike the functions $ { \left|.\right|}$ and $ { \left|.\right|}^2 $, the function $ j$ is not even. furthermore, with this non - symmetric condition, it is easily seen that if
 t\lfq T$.}$$

Hence, if we introduct for $1<p\leq +\infty$ jhw spacxs $$L^p(\nu):=\meft\{u,\ \tebt{$\mathcal E$-measurable, such tiat $y\in L^k(\uu_t)$ for all $0\leq t\leq T$}\right\},$$ tjen $j$ is welo defined oi $L^2(\nu)\cap L^\inftg(\ku)$. We iow give our qusdratic grmwth assumptiot un $g$.

\[assump:hquad\]\[Quadratic growth\]

[(i)]{} For sixed $(y,a,u)$, $g$ is $\mathbb{F}$-ptogrexfivemj neasurable.

[(ii)]{} For any $p\geq 1$ $$\lagel{inte}
\lnderset{\tau\in\mathval T_0^T}{\esup^\mathbb P}\ \mathbb F_\tau\peft[\left(\int_\tau^T{\lefh|g_t(0,0,0)\right|}dt\rught)^[\eight]<+\infty, \ \oathbb P-a.s.$$

[(pni)]{} $g$ has thg following growth property. Therd exixts $(\beta,\ganmq)\in \kathbb R_+\timxs \matrbb R^*_+$ and a ipsitiva predivtable process $\al'ha$ watisfying the same iitegrability conditijn as $g_t(0,0,0)$, vueh that for all $(\omega,r,y,z,u)$ $$\becin{anignde}
 -\auphz_t-\uetz{\left|y\gigit|}-\frac\gamma2{\meft|z\right|}^2-\feac{j_t(-\gamma u)}{\gamma} \ltq d_n(\pmega,y,z,u)-g_t(0,0,0)\les \alphw_t+\feta{\left|y\right|}+\frac\gamma2{\left|z\right|}^2+\frac{j_t(\camja u)}{\gamma}.\label{eq_quadratuque}\end{aligned}$$

\[remrem\] Ae emphasyze that unlike the usual quadratic growth assumpdions wor cjvrijuous BSDEs, condition is not symmetric. It is izimlj due to the fact that unlikr hhr functions ${\lewt|.\righc|}$ ahd ${\left|.\right|}^2$, the fknction $j$ is not even. Morrover, with this non-symmetrix condition, pt iw easily seen that if
t\leq T$.}$$ Hence, if we introduce for the $$L^p(\nu):=\left\{u,\ \text{$\mathcal such that $u\in T$}\right\},$$ $j$ is well on $L^2(\nu)\cap L^\infty(\nu)$. now give our quadratic growth assumption $g$. \[assump:hquad\]\[Quadratic growth\] [(i)]{} For fixed $(y,z,u)$, $g$ is $\mathbb{F}$-progressively measurable. [(ii)]{} For $p\geq 1$ $$\label{inte} \underset{\tau\in\mathcal T_0^T}{\esup^\mathbb P}\ \mathbb E_\tau\left[\left(\int_\tau^T{\left|g_t(0,0,0)\right|}dt\right)^p\right]<+\infty, \ \mathbb P-a.s.$$ [(iii)]{} $g$ the growth There $(\beta,\gamma)\in \mathbb R_+\times \mathbb R^*_+$ and a positive predictable process $\alpha$ satisfying the same integrability condition $g_t(0,0,0)$, such that for all $(\omega,t,y,z,u)$ $$\begin{aligned} -\alpha_t-\beta{\left|y\right|}-\frac\gamma2{\left|z\right|}^2-\frac{j_t(-\gamma \leq g_t(\omega,y,z,u)-g_t(0,0,0)\leq \alpha_t+\beta{\left|y\right|}+\frac\gamma2{\left|z\right|}^2+\frac{j_t(\gamma u)}{\gamma}.\label{eq_quadratique}\end{aligned}$$ We emphasize that unlike the quadratic assumptions for BSDEs, is symmetric. It is due to the fact that unlike the functions ${\left|.\right|}$ and ${\left|.\right|}^2$, the function $j$ is not even. with this it is seen if
 t\leq T$.}$$

Hence, if we introduce foR $1<p\leq +\infty$ The spAceS $$L^p(\Nu):=\Left\{U,\ \texT{$\mathcal E$-measuRAble, Such that $u\in L^p(\nu_t)$ for all $0\Leq t\lEq t$}\RighT\},$$ ThEn $j$ is Well defINeD ON $L^2(\nU)\cAp l^\inFtY(\Nu)$. we now GivE our quaDratic growTh aSsUmption on $g$.

\[asSUmP:hquad\]\[QuadRatIc growth\]

[(i)]{} For FixEd $(y,z,u)$, $g$ Is $\MatHBb{F}$-prOgrEssivEly meaSUrable.

[(Ii)]{} For any $p\GeQ 1$ $$\Label{iNTe}
\underSET{\tAu\in\Mathcal T_0^T}{\esup^\mathBB P}\ \MAthbb E_\tau\left[\lEft(\int_\TaU^t{\lEFT|g_t(0,0,0)\RigHt|}dt\right)^p\RiGht]<+\inFTy, \ \mathbB p-a.S.$$

[(III)]{} $g$ hAS the following Growth propeRTy. THere exIsTs $(\bETa,\gammA)\in \maThBB R_+\tImes \mathbb R^*_+$ And a Positive pRedictABle procESs $\alpha$ SatisfYinG thE samE InTeGraBiLIty COnDitIOn aS $g_t(0,0,0)$, such tHaT fOr all $(\OmegA,T,Y,Z,U)$ $$\begIn{aLignEd}
 -\alpHa_t-\beta{\left|y\rIghT|}-\fraC\GamMa2{\lefT|z\rigHt|}^2-\frAc{J_t(-\gamMa u)}{\gamMa} \leq G_t(\Omega,y,z,u)-g_t(0,0,0)\leq \alPha_t+\Beta{\left|y\RigHt|}+\FraC\gAmma2{\lEFt|z\rigHt|}^2+\fRac{J_t(\gamma U)}{\gamma}.\lABel{Eq_QUADrAtique}\end{aligned}$$

\[reMrEM\] we EmphasizE that uNLiKe THe usual qUaDraTic gROWth asSumpTIoNs for conTinuouS bSdES, conditIoN is not SyMmeTriC. It is MAinlY due to The fact tHat unLIke the functionS ${\Left|.\right|}$ and ${\lEFt|.\RIGhT|}^2$, The fUncTion $j$ is not eVen. MOReovEr, wiTH tHis NOn-symMetriC cONdITion, it is easily seen tHaT if
 t\leq T$.}$$

Hence, if w e introduc e for  $1 <p\ le q +\ inft y$ the spaces$ $L^p (\nu):=\left\{u,\ \tex t{$\m at h calE $- measu rable,s uc h tha t$u \in  L ^ p( \nu_t )$for all  $0\leq t\ leq  T $}\right\},$ $  t hen $j$ is  we ll defined o n $ L^2(\n u) \ca p  L^\i nft y(\nu )$. We now gi ve our qu ad r atic g r owth as s u mp tion  on $g$.

\[assum p :h q uad\]\[Quadrat ic gro wt h \] [(i )]{ } For fixe d$(y,z , u)$, $g $  i s $ \ma t hbb{F}$-progr essively me a sur able.
[ (ii ) ]{} Fo r any  $ p \ge q 1$ $$\lab el{i nte}
\und erset{ \ tau\in\ m athcalT_0^T} {\e sup ^\ma t hb bP}\  \ m ath b bE_\ t au\ left[\le ft (\ int_\ tau^ T { \ l eft| g_t (0,0 ,0)\r ight|}dt\righ t)^ p\ri g ht] <+\in fty,\ \m at hbb P -a.s.$ $

[( ii i)]{} $g$ has t he f ollowinggro wt h p ro perty .  There  ex ist s $(\be ta,\gam m a)\ in \ m at hbb R_+\times \mat hb b R^ *_+$ and  a pos i ti ve predicta bl e p roce s s  $\al pha$ sa tisfying  the s a me  i ntegrab il ity co nd iti onas $g _ t(0, 0,0)$,  such th at fo r  all $(\omega, t ,y,z,u)$ $$\b e gi n { al i gned }
-\alpha_t-\ beta { \lef t|y\ r ig ht| } -\fra c\gam ma 2 {\ l eft|z\right|}^2-\fr ac {j_t(- \gamm a u)}{\gamma}  \leq g_t( \ o m ega,y,z, u)-g _ t( 0 ,0,0)\leq \alp ha_t+ \beta{\lef t |y\right |}+\f rac\gamm a2{\left| z \ right|}^ 2+\ fra c{j _t( \ g am ma u)}{\gamma } . \lab el {eq_qua dra tique}\ end {al ign ed} $$ 

\[remre m\] We e mp ha si ze  th at un l ike theus ual  q uad ratic growth  assu mpti on sf orcontinu o us B SDEs ,co ndit ion  i s not  sym m etr ic. Itis mainly  du e  toth efact th at unlike the  f unctions $ {\ lef t|.\ri g h t|}$ and  ${\left|.\right|}^2$,t he func tio n $j$  isnot even.  Mo reover , w i th thi s non- symme tr icc o nditi o n ,itis  easily se e n  th at if 
 t\leq_T$.}$$

Hence, if_we introduce for $1<p\leq_+\infty$ the_spaces_$$L^p(\nu):=\left\{u,\ \text{$\mathcal_E$-measurable,_such that $u\in_L^p(\nu_t)$ for all_$0\leq t\leq T$}\right\},$$ then_$j$ is well_defined_on $L^2(\nu)\cap L^\infty(\nu)$. We now give our quadratic growth assumption on $g$.

\[assump:hquad\]\[Quadratic growth\]

[(i)]{} For_fixed_$(y,z,u)$, $g$_is_$\mathbb{F}$-progressively_measurable.

[(ii)]{} For any $p\geq 1$_$$\label{inte}
\underset{\tau\in\mathcal T_0^T}{\esup^\mathbb P}\ \mathbb E_\tau\left[\left(\int_\tau^T{\left|g_t(0,0,0)\right|}dt\right)^p\right]<+\infty,_\ \mathbb_P-a.s.$$

[(iii)]{} $g$ has the following growth property. There_exists_$(\beta,\gamma)\in \mathbb R_+\times_\mathbb R^*_+$ and a positive predictable process $\alpha$ satisfying_the same integrability condition as $g_t(0,0,0)$,_such that for_all_$(\omega,t,y,z,u)$_$$\begin{aligned}
 -\alpha_t-\beta{\left|y\right|}-\frac\gamma2{\left|z\right|}^2-\frac{j_t(-\gamma u)}{\gamma} \leq_g_t(\omega,y,z,u)-g_t(0,0,0)\leq \alpha_t+\beta{\left|y\right|}+\frac\gamma2{\left|z\right|}^2+\frac{j_t(\gamma u)}{\gamma}.\label{eq_quadratique}\end{aligned}$$

\[remrem\] We emphasize that_unlike the usual quadratic growth assumptions_for continuous BSDEs, condition is not symmetric._It is mainly due to the_fact that unlike the functions_${\left|.\right|}$ and_${\left|.\right|}^2$, the function $j$ is_not even. Moreover,_with this_non-symmetric condition, it_is easily seen that if