 well determined, we do expect stars at the age of the Sun to exhibit a range in rotation periods. Based on the models described above, we estimate this range to be $\sim 1.0~{\rm day}$ at $4.5~{\rm Gyr}$. We therefore adopt this as the uncertainty on the rotation period of a Sun-like star.

For each color bin we fit a model given eq. \[eqn:domegadt\] to the 10th and 90th percentile periods letting $\omega_{0,10}$, $\omega_{0,90}$, $K$, and $\omega_{sat}$ be the free parameters. Here $\omega_{0,10}$ and $\omega_{0,90}$ are the $\omega_{0}$ values at $t_{0} = 100~{\rm Myr}$ for the 10th and 90th percentiles respectively. Note that in solving eq. \[eqn:domegadt\] we use evolutionary tracks computed with the YREC isochrones (Terndrup et al. 2008, in preparation) to determine $I$ and $R$ as functions of $M$ and $t$. As seen in figure \[fig:periodvsageBV\], the model can reproduce the observed spin-down and convergence of rotation periods for stars with $0.5 < (B-V)_{0} < 0.7$ or $1.1 < (B-V)_{0} < 1.5$, however we find that for $0.7 < (B-V)_{0} < 1.1$ ($0.76 M_{\odot} < M < 0.99 M_{\odot}$) the model fails to fit the Pleiades, M34, M37 and the Hyades simultaneously with greater than 95% confidence. In this color-range, the models predict a greater degree of convergence in the rotation periods at the age of M37 than is observed. The models also under-predict the periods of the slowest rotators in M34. When using $(V-I_{C})_{0}$, the models for stars with $1.0 < (V-I_{C})_{0} < 2.5$ ($0.56 M_{\odot} < M < 0.82 M_{\odot}$) fit the M37 observations, but fail to fit the younger clusters. The difference between the $(V-I_{C})_{0}$ and $(B-V)_{0}$ data is that
well determined, we do expect stars at the age of the Sun to parade a compass in rotation periods. Based on the models report above, we estimate this range to be $ \sim 1.0~{\rm day}$ at $ 4.5~{\rm Gyr}$. We consequently adopt this as the uncertainty on the rotation period of a Sun - alike star. 

 For each color bin we equip a model given eq.   \[eqn: domegadt\ ] to the tenth and 90th percentile periods letting $ \omega_{0,10}$, $ \omega_{0,90}$, $ K$, and $ \omega_{sat}$ be the free parameters. Here $ \omega_{0,10}$ and $ \omega_{0,90}$ are the $ \omega_{0}$ values at $ t_{0 } = 100~{\rm Myr}$ for the 10th and ninetieth percentiles respectively. Note that in solving eq.   \[eqn: domegadt\ ] we practice evolutionary tracks computed with the YREC isochrones (Terndrup et al. 2008, in preparation) to determine $ I$ and $ R$ as function of $ M$ and $ t$. As seen in figure   \[fig: periodvsageBV\ ], the model can reproduce the observed tailspin - down and convergence of rotation periods for stars with $ 0.5 < (B - V)_{0 } < 0.7 $ or $ 1.1 < (B - V)_{0 } < 1.5 $, however we find that for $ 0.7 < (B - V)_{0 } < 1.1 $ ($ 0.76 M_{\odot } < M < 0.99 M_{\odot}$) the model fails to equip the Pleiades, M34, M37 and the Hyades simultaneously with capital than 95% confidence. In this color - range, the models predict a greater academic degree of convergence in the rotation period at the age of M37 than is observed. The models besides under - bode the periods of the slowest rotators in M34. When using $ (V - I_{C})_{0}$, the models for stars with $ 1.0 < (V - I_{C})_{0 } < 2.5 $ ($ 0.56 M_{\odot } < M < 0.82 M_{\odot}$) fit the M37 observations, but fail to fit the unseasoned clusters. The difference between the $ (V - I_{C})_{0}$ and $ (B - V)_{0}$ datum is that
 wepl determined, we do expegt stars at the cte of vhe Sun to exhicit a range in rotation perildw. Bastb on the models descfibed abone, we estumatt this range to bx $\sim 1.0~{\rm day}$ af $4.5~{\rm Yyc}$. We therefore sdopt this as the uncertdivtv on the rotation period of a Sun-likq star.

Fpr each color big we sit z model given eq. \[eqn:domegadt\] to the 10th and 90th percentilr periods letting $\omega_{0,10}$, $\omfga_{0,90}$, $N$, and $\omega_{sat}$ be hhe free patzmeewrs. Here $\omeea_{0,10}$ and $\omega_{0,90}$ are the $\ojega_{0}$ values at $t_{0} = 100~{\rm Myr}$ for thd 10th cnd 90th percgurilfv respectivxly. None that in solving eq. \[aqn:domebadt\] we use evpluvionqry tracks computed wmth the YREC isochroges (Terndsu' et al. 2008, in preparatiin) to dgtermhne $K$ ana $R$ ax runctilns of $M$ and $f$. As seen ib figure \[fig:periodvssgqVV\], the model dan re[rjduce the observed spin-down and convergtnce kf rotation periods for stars with $0.5 < (B-V)_{0} < 0.7$ or $1.1 < (B-V)_{0} < 1.5$, hjwever we find that for $0.7 < (B-V)_{0} < 1.1$ ($0.76 M_{\odot} < M < 0.99 M_{\odot}$) dhe mkael fwkos to fit the Pleiades, M34, M37 and the Hyades simulezntouxly with greatcr than 95% confidencr. Ln jhis color-rangg, the modems predict a greatfr degrge of xonvergense im the rotation periods at tye age of M37 nhan is observed. The mldels also bnder-ptedict the periods of the slocest rktators in L34. When usjvg $(V-I_{C})_{0}$, the modelr fpr stars with $1.0 < (V-I_{C})_{0} < 2.5$ ($0.56 M_{\odot} < M < 0.82 M_{\odit}$) fnt the M37 obsgrvatiogs, but faip to nht the younger cludters. Tve differejce between the $(V-I_{C})_{0}$ and $(B-V)_{0}$ data is that
well determined, we do expect stars at of Sun to a range in models above, we estimate range to be 1.0~{\rm day}$ at $4.5~{\rm Gyr}$. We adopt this as the uncertainty on the rotation period of a Sun-like star. each color bin we fit a model given eq. \[eqn:domegadt\] to the 10th 90th periods $\omega_{0,10}$, $K$, and $\omega_{sat}$ be the free parameters. Here $\omega_{0,10}$ and $\omega_{0,90}$ are the $\omega_{0}$ values at = 100~{\rm Myr}$ for the 10th and 90th respectively. Note that in eq. \[eqn:domegadt\] we use evolutionary computed the YREC (Terndrup al. in preparation) to $I$ and $R$ as functions of $M$ and $t$. As seen in figure \[fig:periodvsageBV\], the model can the observed convergence of periods stars $0.5 < (B-V)_{0} or $1.1 < (B-V)_{0} < 1.5$, that for $0.7 < (B-V)_{0} < 1.1$ ($0.76 < M 0.99 M_{\odot}$) the model fails to the Pleiades, M34, M37 and the Hyades simultaneously greater than 95% confidence. In this color-range, the models predict a greater degree of convergence rotation periods at the of M37 than observed. models under-predict periods of slowest rotators in M34. When using $(V-I_{C})_{0}$, the models for stars $1.0 < (V-I_{C})_{0} < 2.5$ ($0.56 M_{\odot} < M < fit M37 observations, but to fit the younger The between the $(V-I_{C})_{0}$ and is
 well determined, we do expect sTars at the aGe of tHe SUn tO eXhibIt a rAnge in rotation PErioDs. Based on the models descRibed AbOVe, we EStImate This ranGE tO BE $\siM 1.0~{\rM dAy}$ aT $4.5~{\rM gyR}$. We thEreFore adoPt this as thE unCeRtainty on the ROtAtion perioD of A Sun-like star.

for Each coLoR biN We fit A moDel giVen eq. \[eQN:domegAdt\] to the 10tH aND 90th perCEntile pERIoDs leTting $\omega_{0,10}$, $\omega_{0,90}$, $K$, aND $\oMEga_{sat}$ be the freE paramEtERs. hERe $\oMegA_{0,10}$ and $\omega_{0,90}$ aRe The $\omEGa_{0}$ valueS At $T_{0} = 100~{\RM myr}$ FOr the 10th and 90th pErcentiles rESpeCtivelY. NOte THat in sOlvinG eQ. \[Eqn:Domegadt\] we uSe evOlutionarY trackS ComputeD With the yREC isOchRonEs (TeRNdRuP et Al. 2008, IN prEPaRatIOn) tO determiNe $i$ aNd $R$ as FuncTIONS of $M$ And $T$. As sEen in Figure \[fig:periOdvSagebv\], thE modeL can rEproDuCe the ObservEd spiN-dOwn and convergenCe of Rotation pEriOdS foR sTars wITh $0.5 < (B-V)_{0} < 0.7$ or $1.1 < (b-V)_{0} < 1.5$, hOweVer we fiNd that fOR $0.7 < (B-V)_{0} < 1.1$ ($0.76 m_{\oDOT} < m < 0.99 M_{\Odot}$) the model fails tO fIT ThE PleiadeS, M34, M37 and THe hyADes simulTaNeoUsly WITh greAter THaN 95% confideNce. In tHIs CoLor-rangE, tHe modeLs PreDicT a greATer dEgree oF convergEnce iN The rotation perIOds at the age of m37 ThAN Is OBserVed. the models alSo unDEr-prEdicT ThE peRIods oF the sLoWEsT Rotators in M34. When usinG $(V-i_{C})_{0}$, the mOdels For stars with $1.0 < (V-i_{C})_{0} < 2.5$ ($0.56 M_{\odot} < M < 0.82 M_{\oDOT}$) Fit the M37 oBserVAtIOns, but fail to fiT the yOunger clusTErs. The diFfereNce betweEn the $(V-I_{C})_{0}$ aND $(b-V)_{0}$ data is ThaT
 well determined, we do ex pect stars  at t heage  o f th e Su n to exhibit a rang e in rotation periods.  Base do n th e  m odels  descri b ed a bov e,  w e e st i ma te th isrange t o be $\sim  1. 0~ {\rm day}$ a t  $ 4.5~{\rm G yr} $. We theref ore  adopt  t his as th e u ncert aintyo n therotationpe r iod of a Sun-l i k estar .

For each color bi n  we fit a mode l give ne q. \ [eq n:d omegadt\]to  the1 0th and 90 t h per c entile period s letting $ \ ome ga_{0, 10 }$, $\omeg a_{0, 90 } $,$K$, and $\ omeg a_{sat}$be the free pa r ameters . Here  $\ ome ga_{ 0 ,1 0} $ a nd $\o m eg a_{ 0 ,90 }$ are t he  $ \omeg a_{0 } $ v alue s a t $t _{0}= 100~{\rm My r}$  for the  10th  and90th  p ercen tilesrespe ct ively. Note tha t in  solvingeq.  \ [eq n: domeg a dt\] w e u seevoluti onary t r ack sc o m pu ted with the YRECis o c hr ones (Te rndrup et  a l . 2008,in  pr epar a t ion)to d e te rmine $I $ and$ R$  a s funct io ns of$M $ a nd$t$.A s se en infigure \ [fig: p eriodvsageBV\] ,  the model ca n  r e p ro d ucethe  observed s pin- d ownandc on ver g enceof ro ta t io n  periods for starswi th $0. 5 < ( B-V)_{0} < 0. 7$ or $1.1 < (B-V)_{0 } <1 .5 $ , however we f ind t hat for $0 . 7 < (B-V )_{0}  < 1.1$($0.76 M_ { \ odot} <M <  0. 99M_{ \ o do t}$) the mode l fail sto fitthe  Pleiad es,  M3 4,M37  a nd the Hy ades sim ul ta ne ou sly  with greaterth an95 % c onfid e nce. I n thi s co lo r- r ang e, them od e l s pr ed ic t agre at er de gree ofconverg ence in t her otat io nperiods  at the age o fM37 than i sobs erved. T he model s also under-predict th e  period s o f the  slo west rota tor s in M 34. When u sing $ (V-I_ {C })_ { 0 }$, t h e  m ode ls  for stars w ith  $1.0  <  (V- I_{C})_ {0} < 2.5$ ($0.56M _{\ odot} < M < 0 .82  M_{ \ o do t}$ )  f i t t he M37 o bservations, bu t fail tofi t  t he younger clu st ers. Th e diffe rence between  the $(V- I_{C})_{0 }$  and $ (B- V)_{0}$ da ta is th at
 well_determined, we_do expect stars at_the age_of_the Sun_to_exhibit a range_in rotation periods._Based on the models_described above, we_estimate_this range to be $\sim 1.0~{\rm day}$ at $4.5~{\rm Gyr}$. We therefore adopt this_as_the uncertainty_on_the_rotation period of a Sun-like_star.

For each color bin we_fit a_model given eq. \[eqn:domegadt\] to the 10th and 90th_percentile_periods letting $\omega_{0,10}$,_$\omega_{0,90}$, $K$, and $\omega_{sat}$ be the free parameters. Here_$\omega_{0,10}$ and $\omega_{0,90}$ are the $\omega_{0}$_values at $t_{0}_=_100~{\rm_Myr}$ for the 10th_and 90th percentiles respectively. Note that_in solving eq. \[eqn:domegadt\] we use evolutionary_tracks computed with the YREC isochrones (Terndrup_et al. 2008, in preparation) to_determine $I$ and $R$ as_functions of_$M$ and $t$. As seen_in figure \[fig:periodvsageBV\], the_model can_reproduce the observed_spin-down and convergence of rotation periods_for stars with_$0.5 < (B-V)_{0} < 0.7$ or_$1.1_< (B-V)_{0} <_1.5$,_however_we find_that for $0.7_<_(B-V)_{0} <_1.1$_($0.76 M_{\odot} < M < 0.99_M_{\odot}$)_the model fails to fit the Pleiades,_M34, M37 and the_Hyades_simultaneously with greater than_95% confidence. In this color-range,_the models predict a greater degree_of convergence_in the_rotation periods at the age of M37 than is observed. The_models also under-predict the periods of_the slowest rotators in_M34. When_using_$(V-I_{C})_{0}$, the models_for_stars with_$1.0 < (V-I_{C})_{0} < 2.5$ ($0.56 M_{\odot}_< M_< 0.82 M_{\odot}$) fit the M37_observations, but fail to_fit_the younger clusters. The difference between_the $(V-I_{C})_{0}$ and $(B-V)_{0}$ data is_that