k})\\
h(\mathbf{x})
\end{array}\right.\label{eq:Relation I and h}$$

Equation (\[eq:Relation I and h\]) allows to postulate an equivalent condition which constitutes an upper limit for the expected value of the potential energy given the expected value for differential entropies

$$\left\langle V\right\rangle <\left\{ \begin{array}{l}
\left\langle h(t_{k})\right\rangle \\
\left\langle h(\mathbf{x})\right\rangle 
\end{array}\right.\label{eq:Relation V and h}$$

where $\left\langle h(t_{k})\right\rangle $ and $\left\langle h(\mathbf{x})\right\rangle $ are given by $$\left\langle h(t_{k})\right\rangle =\iint\Psi^{*}h(t_{k})\Psi\,dt_{k}d\mathbf{x}$$ $$\left\langle h(\mathbf{x})\right\rangle =\int\Psi^{*}h(\mathbf{x})\Psi\,d\mathbf{x}$$

Expressions (\[eq:Relation I and h\]) and (\[eq:Relation V and h\]) establish that the mutual information and ultimately the expected value of the potential energy are upper limited by a maximum value given by the entropy of the distribution of inputs or targets. As we have already discussed, to choose this maximum value as an arbitrary reference point it is desirable to identify the differential entropies from probability densities independent of the problem under consideration. Adequate choices can be the entropy of the uniform distribution or the entropy of the normal distribution with the same variance of the dataset. To analyze more deeply the physical nature of the probability density which gives rise to the maximum entropy, we will now consider the question from a point of view closer to quantum mechanics.

Consider a system defined by a state function $\Psi_{0}$ in which inputs and targets are independent $$p(\mathbf{t},\mathbf{x})=p(\mathbf{t})p(\mathbf{\mathbf{x}})$$ Such a system has zero mutual information. Assuming valid the interpretation we gave in the Section \[subsec:Interpretation-of-the state function\] of the square of the state function as conditional density $p(\mathbf{x}|\mathbf{t})$, together with the equation (\[eq:I and h bis\]), calling $
k})\\ 
 h(\mathbf{x }) 
 \end{array}\right.\label{eq: Relation I and h}$$ 

 Equation (\[eq: Relation I and h\ ]) allows to postulate an equivalent condition which constitutes an upper terminus ad quem for the expect value of the potential energy give the ask value for differential entropies 

 $ $ \left\langle V\right\rangle < \left\ { \begin{array}{l } 
 \left\langle h(t_{k})\right\rangle \\ 
 \left\langle h(\mathbf{x})\right\rangle 
 \end{array}\right.\label{eq: Relation V and h}$$ 

 where $ \left\langle h(t_{k})\right\rangle $ and $ \left\langle h(\mathbf{x})\right\rangle $ are give by $ $ \left\langle h(t_{k})\right\rangle = \iint\Psi^{*}h(t_{k})\Psi\,dt_{k}d\mathbf{x}$$ $ $ \left\langle h(\mathbf{x})\right\rangle = \int\Psi^{*}h(\mathbf{x})\Psi\,d\mathbf{x}$$ 

 Expressions (\[eq: Relation I and h\ ]) and (\[eq: Relation V and h\ ]) establish that the mutual data and ultimately the expect value of the potential department of energy are upper limited by a maximum value given by the entropy of the distribution of stimulation or targets. As we have already discussed, to choose this maximum value as an arbitrary reference point it is desirable to name the differential entropies from probability densities independent of the trouble under consideration. Adequate choices can be the entropy of the uniform distribution or the entropy of the normal distribution with the like variance of the dataset. To analyze more profoundly the physical nature of the probability density which gives rise to the maximal entropy, we will now consider the question from a point of view closer to quantum mechanics. 

 Consider a system defined by a state function $ \Psi_{0}$ in which inputs and targets are independent $ $ p(\mathbf{t},\mathbf{x})=p(\mathbf{t})p(\mathbf{\mathbf{x}})$$ Such a system have zero mutual information. Assuming valid the rendition we give in the Section \[subsec: Interpretation - of - the state function\ ] of the public square of the state affair as conditional density $ p(\mathbf{x}|\mathbf{t})$, together with the equality (\[eq: I and h bis\ ]), calling $
k})\\
h(\mwthbf{x})
\end{array}\right.\label{tq:Relation I and k}$$

Wquatimn (\[eq:Rslation K and h\]) allows to postulate en ewuivaoent condition which cunstituted an uppwr lmmit for the expxdted value of bhe pmvential energy niven the efpected value xof bifferential entropies

$$\left\langle V\ridht\rangke <\left\{ \begin{arrwy}{l}
\ltft\jangmv m(t_{k})\right\rangle \\
\left\langle h(\mathbr{x})\right\gangle 
\end{array}\ribht.\label{eq:Relation V and h}$$

aherf $\left\langle h(t_{k})\rihht\rangle $ qnd $\jwft\langle h(\mxthbf{x})\righu\rcngle $ are fiven by $$\left\langle h(t_{k})\right\ranele =\innt\Psi^{*}h(t_{k})\Psu\,dr_{k}d\ldthbf{x}$$ $$\left\oanglv h(\mathbf{x})\rigmn\rangle =\int\Psi^{*}n(\mathbf{x})\Psi\,d\mabhbf{x}$$

Xxprwssions (\[eq:Relation I end h\]) and (\[eq:Relation V and h\]) ascablish that the mutuql infotmatimn ave uutijavelg the fxpxcted value of the potwntial energy are ukpew limited by a maximtm value given by the entropy of the distgibufion of inputs or targers. As we have already discusseq, to choose this maximum value as an arbitrary rexerenre ponkb it us desirable to identify the differential entro[jex nrom probability densities onfelgndent of the kroblem unser consideration. Wdequatg choixes can bt the entropy of the uniform disrribution or rhe entropy of the normal discributoon woth the same variance oy the sataset. To wnalyze mkfe deeply the phhsibal tature of the probability qensity wiich yives rire tp the iaximum enhropy, we will now considfr thg quesdion from w point of view closer to quantnk mechanics.

Cpnvidvr a systzm deflned by a state function $\Psi_{0}$ nn which inpugs and tarfets arx independene $$p(\mathbf{t},\matvhf{x})=p(\mathbf{t})p(\kathbf{\maehbf{z}})$$ Suxh a syrgem has zero mitual information. Awsuming valid the lnterkrstation we gave in the Section \[sunsez:Ineegprxtatijt-of-the state funztium\] of ghe square iw thr state function as wondjtional density $p(\mstmbf{x}|\mathbd{t})$, togetrer with the rquation (\[eq:I and h bis\]), rallinj $
k})\\ h(\mathbf{x}) \end{array}\right.\label{eq:Relation I and h}$$ Equation and allows to an equivalent condition for expected value of potential energy given expected value for differential entropies $$\left\langle <\left\{ \begin{array}{l} \left\langle h(t_{k})\right\rangle \\ \left\langle h(\mathbf{x})\right\rangle \end{array}\right.\label{eq:Relation V and h}$$ where $\left\langle $ and $\left\langle h(\mathbf{x})\right\rangle $ are given by $$\left\langle h(t_{k})\right\rangle =\iint\Psi^{*}h(t_{k})\Psi\,dt_{k}d\mathbf{x}$$ $$\left\langle h(\mathbf{x})\right\rangle Expressions I h\]) (\[eq:Relation V and h\]) establish that the mutual information and ultimately the expected value of the energy are upper limited by a maximum value by the entropy of distribution of inputs or targets. we already discussed, choose maximum as an arbitrary point it is desirable to identify the differential entropies from probability densities independent of the problem under Adequate choices the entropy the distribution the entropy of distribution with the same variance of analyze more deeply the physical nature of the density which rise to the maximum entropy, we now consider the question from a point of closer to quantum mechanics. Consider a system defined by a state function $\Psi_{0}$ in which targets are independent $$p(\mathbf{t},\mathbf{x})=p(\mathbf{t})p(\mathbf{\mathbf{x}})$$ a system has mutual Assuming the we gave the Section \[subsec:Interpretation-of-the state function\] of the square of the state as conditional density $p(\mathbf{x}|\mathbf{t})$, together with the equation (\[eq:I and calling
k})\\
h(\mathbf{x})
\end{array}\right.\labEl{eq:RelatiOn I anD h}$$

EQuaTiOn (\[eq:relaTion I and h\]) allowS To poStulate an equivalent conDitioN wHIch cONsTitutEs an uppER lIMIt fOr ThE exPeCTeD valuE of The poteNtial energY giVeN the expected VAlUe for diffeRenTial entropieS

$$\leFt\langLe v\riGHt\ranGle <\Left\{ \bEgin{arRAy}{l}
\lefT\langle h(t_{K})\rIGht\ranGLe \\
\left\lANGlE h(\maThbf{x})\right\rangle 
\eND{aRRay}\right.\label{eQ:RelatIoN v aND H}$$

whEre $\Left\langle H(t_{K})\righT\Rangle $ aND $\lEFT\LanGLe h(\mathbf{x})\rigHt\rangle $ are GIveN by $$\lefT\lAngLE h(t_{k})\riGht\raNgLE =\iiNt\Psi^{*}h(t_{k})\Psi\,Dt_{k}d\Mathbf{x}$$ $$\leFt\langLE h(\mathbF{X})\right\rAngle =\iNt\PSi^{*}h(\MathBF{x})\psI\,d\mAtHBf{x}$$

eXpResSIonS (\[eq:RelatIoN I And h\]) aNd (\[eq:rELATion v anD h\]) esTabliSh that the mutuAl iNforMAtiOn and UltimAtelY tHe expEcted vAlue oF tHe potential enerGy arE upper limIteD bY a mAxImum vALue givEn bY thE entropY of the dIStrIbUTIOn Of inputs or targets. AS wE HAvE already DiscusSEd, To CHoose thiS mAxiMum vALUe as aN arbITrAry referEnce poINt It Is desirAbLe to idEnTifY thE diffERentIal entRopies frOm proBAbility densitiES independent oF ThE PRoBLem uNdeR consideratIon. ADEquaTe chOIcEs cAN be thE entrOpY Of THe uniform distributiOn Or the eNtropY of the normal dIstributioN WITh the samE varIAnCE of the dataset. TO analYze more deePLy the phySical Nature of The probabILIty densiTy wHicH giVes RISe To the maximum eNTRopy, We Will now ConSider thE quEstIon FroM a Point of viEw closer To QuAnTuM meChaniCS.

ConsideR a SysTeM deFined BY a statE funcTion $\psI_{0}$ iN WhiCh inputS AnD TArgeTs ArE indEpeNdEnt $$p(\mAthbF{T},\maThbf{x})=p(\mAthbf{t})p(\maThbF{\MathBf{X}})$$ SUch a sysTem has zero mutUaL informatiOn. assUming vALId the intErpretation we gave in the SECtion \[suBseC:InteRpreTation-of-tHe sTate fuNctIOn\] of thE squarE of thE sTatE FUnctiON As ConDiTional densITY $p(\mAthbf{X}|\mAthbF{t})$, togetHer with the equation (\[EQ:I aNd h bis\]), calling $
k})\\
h(\mathbf{x})
\end{a rray}\righ t.\la bel {eq :R elat ionI and h}$$

Eq u atio n (\[eq:Relation I and  h\])  a l lows to  post ulate a n  e q u iva le nt  co nd i ti on wh ich  consti tutes an u ppe rlimit for th e  e xpected va lue  of the pote nti al ene rg y g i ven t heexpec ted va l ue for  differen ti a l entr o pies

$ $ \ le ft\l angle V\right\ran g le <\left\{ \begi n{arra y} { l} \ lef t\l angle h(t_ {k })\ri g ht\rang l e\ \ \le f t\langle h(\m athbf{x})\r i ght \rangl e
\e n d{arra y}\ri gh t .\l abel{eq:Rel atio n V and h }$$

w h ere $\l e ft\lang le h(t _{k })\ righ t \r an gle  $ and $\ lef t \la ngle h(\ ma th bf{x} )\ri g h t \ rang le$ ar e giv en by $$\left \la ngle h(t _{k}) \righ t\ra ng le =\ iint\P si^{* }h (t_{k})\Psi\,dt _{k} d\mathbf{ x}$ $$$\ le ft\la n gle h( \ma thb f{x})\r ight\ra n gle  = \ i n t\ Psi^{*}h(\mathbf{x }) \ P si \,d\math bf{x}$ $ 
Ex p ressions  ( \[e q:Re l a tionI an d  h \]) and(\[eq: R el at ion V a nd  h\])es tab lis h tha t  the  mutua l inform ation and ultimately the expectedv al u e  o f  the  po tential ene rgya re u pper li mit e d bya max im u mv alue given by the e nt ropy o f the  distribution  of inputs o r  targets . As we have already d iscus sed, to ch o ose this  maxi mum valu e as an a r b itrary r efe ren cepoi n t  i t is desirabl e to i de ntify t hediffere nti alent rop ie s from pr obabilit yde ns it ies  inde p endent o fthe  p rob lem u n der co nside rati on .A deq uate ch o ic e s  can  b etheent ro py of  the uni form di stributio n o r  the  e nt ropy of  the normal d is tributionwi ththe sa m e  varianc e of the dataset. To an a lyze mo redeepl y th e physica l n atureoft he pro babili ty de ns ity w hichg i ve s r is e to the m a x imu m ent ro py,we will  now consider theq ues tion from a p oin t of v ie w c l os e r t oq uan t u m mechanics.

C onsider asy s te m definedb y a  s tate fu nction$\Psi _ {0}$ in  which in puts andta rget s are  independe nt $$p(\ mathbf{t} , \math b f{ x})=p (\m athbf{ t} )p( \math bf{\ma t hbf {x}}) $$ Suc ha syst em ha szero mut ual information. Assumi ng val id th e i nterpreta tio n  we  gave intheSection \[ sub sec :Inte rpr e tatio n-of - th e s t ate f unct i on\] of t h esqu a r eof the stat e f unc tionasc onditi onal  density $p(\math b f{x}|\mathbf{t })$, t oge the r  wit hthe equation ( \[e q: I and h bi s\ ]), calling  $
k})\\
h(\mathbf{x})
\end{array}\right.\label{eq:Relation I_and h}$$

Equation_(\[eq:Relation I and h\])_allows to_postulate_an equivalent_condition_which constitutes an_upper limit for_the expected value of_the potential energy_given_the expected value for differential entropies

$$\left\langle V\right\rangle <\left\{ \begin{array}{l}
\left\langle h(t_{k})\right\rangle \\
\left\langle h(\mathbf{x})\right\rangle 
\end{array}\right.\label{eq:Relation V_and_h}$$

where $\left\langle_h(t_{k})\right\rangle_$_and $\left\langle h(\mathbf{x})\right\rangle $ are_given by $$\left\langle h(t_{k})\right\rangle =\iint\Psi^{*}h(t_{k})\Psi\,dt_{k}d\mathbf{x}$$_$$\left\langle h(\mathbf{x})\right\rangle_=\int\Psi^{*}h(\mathbf{x})\Psi\,d\mathbf{x}$$

Expressions (\[eq:Relation I and h\]) and (\[eq:Relation V_and_h\]) establish that_the mutual information and ultimately the expected value of_the potential energy are upper limited_by a maximum_value_given_by the entropy of_the distribution of inputs or targets._As we have already discussed, to_choose this maximum value as an arbitrary_reference point it is desirable to_identify the differential entropies from_probability densities_independent of the problem under_consideration. Adequate choices_can be_the entropy of_the uniform distribution or the entropy_of the normal_distribution with the same variance of_the_dataset. To analyze_more_deeply_the physical_nature of the_probability_density which_gives_rise to the maximum entropy, we_will_now consider the question from a point_of view closer to_quantum_mechanics.

Consider a system defined_by a state function $\Psi_{0}$_in which inputs and targets are_independent $$p(\mathbf{t},\mathbf{x})=p(\mathbf{t})p(\mathbf{\mathbf{x}})$$_Such a_system has zero mutual information. Assuming valid the interpretation we gave_in the Section \[subsec:Interpretation-of-the state function\]_of the square of_the state_function_as conditional density_$p(\mathbf{x}|\mathbf{t})$,_together with_the equation (\[eq:I and h bis\]), calling_$