 bolometric luminosity —

  

is a few times higher than the 0.5–10.0 keV luminosity. In some cases, the published disk temperatures were “effective temperatures” — converted from “color temperatures” by application of a color correction factor, which attempts to account for effects such as spectral hardening from radiative transfer through a disk (Shimura & Takahara 1995; Merloni, Fabian, & Ross 2000; Makishima et al. 2000). In these cases, we converted the effective temperature to a color temperature. Color temperatures are compared directly to color temperatures in this work. This introduces no significant temperature bias; a recent study has shown that the correction factor for IMBHs should be very similar to that sometimes applied to stellar-mass black holes (Fabian, Miller, & Ross 2004).

The lower energy bound of the 0.5–10.0 keV range is somewhat higher than the present lower energy bounds of [*Chandra*]{} and [*XMM-Newton*]{}; however, history suggests that as all X-ray detectors age, the lower energy bound gradually increases. This range was chosen to be forward–looking, and to avoid any biases inherent in relying too heavily on the lowest bins in the [*Chandra*]{} and [*XMM-Newton*]{} bandpasses.

To understand the properties of the ULX sources within the context of BHCs in their brightest states, we plotted the luminosity and disk temperature of each ULX, and the corresponding data for the five most luminous observations of each BHC in our sample (see Figure 1). In selecting the brightest BHC observations, we are attempting to select those phases wherein each source is closest to its Eddington luminosity. In all cases, the errors on the disk color temperatures are 90% confidence errors. For the ULX sources, the luminosity errors are the 90% confidence errors in the measured flux. A review of the literature shows that constraints on the distance to given Galactic sources can change considerably over time with refined measurements, especially when extinction is particularly high. To be conservative, the luminosity errors on the stellar–mass black holes were set by taking the best-fit measured flux, and enforcing fractional errors of $\pm 30$%. This value is somewhat arbitrary, but certainly greater than most quoted errors, and represents a best-guess value based on the broad literature.

The difference between the IMBHC ULXs and standard, stellar-mass BHCs is shown clearly in Figure 1.
bolometric luminosity — 

  

 is a few times higher than the 0.5–10.0   keV luminosity. In some cases, the published phonograph record temperature were “ effective temperatures ” — converted from “ color temperature ” by application of a color discipline factor, which attempts to account for consequence such as spectral hardening from radiative transfer through a magnetic disk (Shimura & Takahara 1995; Merloni, Fabian, & Ross 2000; Makishima et al.   2000). In these cases, we converted the effective temperature to a coloring material temperature. Color temperature are compared directly to color temperatures in this work. This precede no significant temperature bias; a recent sketch has shown that the correction factor for IMBHs should be very similar to that sometimes use to stellar - mass black holes (Fabian, Miller, & Ross 2004). 

 The lower department of energy bound of the 0.5–10.0   keV range is somewhat higher than the present lower energy limit of [ * Chandra * ] { } and [ * XMM - Newton * ] { }; however, history suggest that as all X - ray detectors age, the lower energy constipate gradually addition. This range was choose to be forward – looking, and to avoid any biases built-in in relying too heavily on the lowest bank identification number in the [ * Chandra * ] { } and [ * XMM - Newton * ] { } bandpasses. 

 To understand the properties of the ULX sources within the context of BHCs in their brightest states, we plotted the luminosity and magnetic disk temperature of each ULX, and the corresponding data for the five most luminous observation of each BHC in our sample distribution (determine Figure 1). In selecting the brightest BHC observations, we are try to select those phases wherein each source is close to its Eddington luminosity. In all cases, the errors on the disk color temperature are 90% confidence error. For the ULX sources, the luminosity errors are the 90% assurance errors in the measured flux. A review of the literature read that constraints on the distance to given Galactic reference can change considerably over time with refined measurement, especially when extinction is particularly high. To be button-down, the luminosity errors on the stellar – mass black holes were put by taking the best - fit mensural flux, and enforcing fractional errors of $ \pm 30$%. This value is somewhat arbitrary, but certainly greater than most quote errors, and represents a best - guess value based on the broad literature. 

 The difference between the IMBHC ULXs and standard, leading - mass BHCs is shown intelligibly in Figure 1.
 bopometric luminosity —

  

is a few times highgr than vhe 0.5–10.0 keV luminoskty. In some cases, the publisied eisk uvmperatures were “effeztive temieratures” — coiverted from “color tempevcturea” by cp'lication of a golor correwtion factor, wvizh attempts to account for effects sush as sleftral hardenind frpi raspauive transfer through a disk (Shimhra & Tanahara 1995; Merlomi, Fabian, & Ross 2000; Makishima et wl. 2000). In these cases, ae convertee thq effective tdmperature to a color jemperature. Color temperatures afe cokpared dirgerly jo color tem'eratuges in this work. This introdices no signiflcant tenperature bias; a receit study has shown trat the cmrxection factor for IMVHw shoold ba veft skmimac tk that sojetimes apllied to stwllar-mass black holts (Sqbian, Miller, & Ross 2004).

Ehq lower energy bound of the 0.5–10.0 keV range iv skmewhat higher than the present lower energy bounds os [*Chandra*]{} and [*XMM-Newton*]{}; however, history suggests dhat es alo W-ray eehectors age, the lower energy bound gradually yhctesses. This rangc was chosen to be flrewrd–looking, ana to arkis any biases inherfnt in telyint too headily on the lowest bins in the [*Xhandra*]{} and [*QMM-Nwwton*]{} bandpasses.

To understand the proprrties of the ULX sourczs witgin the conhext of BGZs in their brigftext states, we plotted the lumynosity aid dixk tempdratore of qach ULX, ajd thc corresponding datw for tve five modt luminous observations of eaci BHC in our xakplv (see Figbre 1). Ik selecting the brightest BHC observctions, we are atnempting vo select thjse phases whatein each soucce is cljsesr to its Edakngton luminosoty. In all cases, thw errors on the dixk zklor temperaturzr are 90% confidencr efrows. Fpr dhe ULX sourwes, ghe kuminusity errorw are the 90% confidence errmrs jn the measured flix. A revieq of the literature snows that constraijts oi the vistanve jo given Galactic sources can cgange condidcrably over tyme qith refined measurements, especially when extinctioi is particularly high. Ro be conservative, jhe luminosity errows on the stellar–mass black hiles were set by uaking the best-fit meashred fnux, ajd enforcing fractional errors of $\pm 30$%. This value is somewhat arbitrary, bur certeigly greater tham mosn qbotzd errows, aid represents a bext-guess value based on the broav literatuse.

Che difference between the IMNHZ ULXs and stxndard, stellar-mass BHCs js shown clearly in Figure 1.
bolometric luminosity — is a few times the keV luminosity. some cases, the temperatures” converted from “color by application of color correction factor, which attempts to for effects such as spectral hardening from radiative transfer through a disk (Shimura Takahara 1995; Merloni, Fabian, & Ross 2000; Makishima et al. 2000). In these we the temperature a color temperature. Color temperatures are compared directly to color temperatures in this work. This introduces significant temperature bias; a recent study has shown the correction factor for should be very similar to sometimes to stellar-mass holes Miller, Ross 2004). The energy bound of the 0.5–10.0 keV range is somewhat higher than the present lower energy bounds of and [*XMM-Newton*]{}; suggests that all detectors the lower energy increases. This range was chosen to to avoid any biases inherent in relying too on the bins in the [*Chandra*]{} and [*XMM-Newton*]{} To understand the properties of the ULX sources the context of BHCs in their brightest states, we plotted the luminosity and disk temperature ULX, and the corresponding for the five luminous of BHC our sample Figure 1). In selecting the brightest BHC observations, we are attempting select those phases wherein each source is closest to its In cases, the errors the disk color temperatures 90% errors. For the ULX luminosity are errors the flux. A review of literature shows that constraints on distance to given Galactic time with refined measurements, especially when extinction is high. To be conservative, the luminosity errors the stellar–mass black holes were set by taking the best-fit measured flux, enforcing fractional $\pm 30$%. This value is somewhat arbitrary, but greater than most quoted and represents a best-guess value based on the broad The between the ULXs and standard, BHCs is shown in Figure 1.
 bolometric luminosity —

  

is a feW times highEr thaN thE 0.5–10.0 kev lUminOsitY. In some cases, thE PublIshed disk temperatures wEre “efFeCTive TEmPeratUres” — conVErTED frOm “CoLor TeMPeRaturEs” bY applicAtion of a coLor CoRrection factOR, wHich attempTs tO account for eFfeCts sucH aS spECtral HarDeninG from rADiativE transfer ThROugh a dISk (ShimuRA & taKahaRa 1995; Merloni, Fabian, & RoSS 2000; MAKishima et al. 2000). In tHese caSeS, We CONveRteD the effectIvE tempERature tO A cOLOR teMPerature. Color TemperatureS Are ComparEd DirECtly to Color TeMPerAtures in thiS worK. This intrOduces NO signifICant temPeratuRe bIas; A recENt StUdy HaS ShoWN tHat THe cOrrectioN fAcTor foR IMBhS SHOuld Be vEry sImilaR to that sometiMes ApplIEd tO stelLar-maSs blAcK holeS (FabiaN, MillEr, & ross 2004).

The lower eneRgy bOund of the 0.5–10.0 KeV RaNge Is SomewHAt highEr tHan The presEnt loweR EneRgY BOUnDs of [*Chandra*]{} and [*XMM-NEwTON*]{}; hOwever, hiStory sUGgEsTS that as aLl x-raY detECTors aGe, thE LoWer energY bound GRaDuAlly incReAses. ThIs RanGe wAs choSEn to Be forwArd–lookiNg, and TO avoid any biaseS Inherent in relYInG TOo HEaviLy oN the lowest bIns iN The [*CHandRA*]{} aNd [*Xmm-NewtOn*]{} banDpASsES.

To understand the proPeRties oF the UlX sources withIn the conteXT OF BHCs in tHeir BRiGHtest states, we pLotteD the luminoSIty and diSk temPerature Of each ULX, AND the corrEspOndIng DatA FOr The five most luMINous ObServatiOns Of each BhC iN ouR saMplE (sEe Figure 1). IN selectiNg ThE bRiGhtEst BHc ObservatIoNs, wE aRe aTtempTIng to sElect ThosE pHaSEs wHerein eACh SOUrce Is ClOsesT to ItS EddiNgtoN LumInosity. in all caseS, thE ErroRs On The disk Color temperatUrEs are 90% confiDeNce Errors. fOR the ULX sOurces, the luminosity erroRS are the 90% ConFidenCe erRors in the MeaSured fLux. a Review Of the lIteraTuRe sHOWs thaT COnStrAiNts on the diSTAncE to giVeN GalActic soUrces can change consIDerAbly over time wIth RefiNED mEasUReMEntS, eSPecIALly when extinctiOn is particUlARlY high. To be cONseRvAtive, thE luminoSity eRRors on tHe stellar–Mass black HoLes wERE seT by taking tHe best-fiT measured FLux, anD EnForciNg fRactioNaL erRors oF $\pm 30$%. ThiS ValUe is sOmewhaT aRbitraRy, but CeRtainly gReater than most quoted errOrs, and RepreSenTs a best-guEss VAluE based on tHe brOad literatUre.

the DiffeRenCE betwEen tHE ImBHc uLXs aNd stANdard, stelLAr-MasS bhCS is shown cleARLY in figurE 1.
 bolometric luminosity —
  

is a f ew ti mes  hi gh er t hanthe 0.5–10.0 k e V lu minosity. In some case s, th ep ubli s he d dis k tempe r at u r eswe re  “e ff e ct ive t emp erature s” — conve rte dfrom “colort em peratures”  by  application  of  a col or  co r recti onfacto r, whi c h atte mpts to a cc o unt fo r  effect s su ch a s spectral harden i ng from radiative  trans fe r  t h r oug h a  disk (Shi mu ra &T akahara 19 9 5 ;  Me r loni, Fabian,  & Ross 200 0 ; M akishi ma  et al. 20 00).In the se cases, w e co nverted t he eff e ctive t e mperatu re toa c olo r te m pe ra tur e. Col o rtem p era tures ar eco mpare d di r e c t ly t o c olor  temp eratures in t his  wor k . T his i ntrod uces  n o sig nifica nt te mp erature bias; a  rec ent study  ha ssho wn  that the co rre cti on fact or forI MBH ss h o ul d be very similarto t ha t someti mes ap p li ed to stell ar -ma ss b l a ck ho les( Fa bian, Mi ller,&  R os s 2004) .
The l ow erene rgy b o undof the  0.5–10. 0 keV range is somew h at higher tha n  t h e  p r esen t l ower energy  bou n ds o f [* C ha ndr a *]{}and [ *X M M- N ewton*]{}; however,  h istory  sugg ests that asall X-rayd e t ectors a ge,t he lower energy b oundgraduallyi ncreases . Thi s rangewas chose n to be fo rwa rd– loo kin g ,  a nd to avoid a n y  bia se s inher ent  in rel yin g t oohea vi ly on the  lowestbi ns  i nthe  [*Ch a ndra*]{}  a nd[* XMM -Newt o n*]{}bandp asse s. 
T o u ndersta n dt h e pr op er ties  of  t he UL X so u rce s withi n the con tex t  ofBH Cs  in the ir brightestst ates, we p lo tte d thel u minosity  and disk temperature o f  each U LX,  andthecorrespon din g data  fo r  the f ive mo st lu mi nou s obser v a ti ons  o f each BHC i n o ur sa mp le ( see Fig ure 1). In selecti n g t he brightestBHC  obs e r va tio n s, wear e  at t e mpting to selec t those ph as e swherein ea c h s ou rce isclosest  to i t s Eddin gton lumi nosity. I nallc a ses , the erro rs on th e disk co l or te m pe ratur esare 90 %con fiden ce err o rs.  Forthe UL Xsource s, th eluminosi ty errors are the 90% c onfide nce e rro rs in the  me a sur ed flux.A re view of th e l ite ratur e s h ows t hatc on str a intson t h e distanc e  t o g i v en  Galactic s o u r ces  cancha n ge con side rably over time w i th refined mea sure m e nts , e s peci al ly when extinc tio ni s  particu la rly high. T o be con se r vativ e, the  lumin osity e r r or s  on th e st ell ar–mass b lac kh oles we re  s e t by t akin gthe be st-fit meas u r ed flux, and enf orcin g fract i ona l err or s of $\ p m 30 $%. This v alue is som ewhatarbi trary , but c er tainly  gr ea ter than m o st quoted  erro rs, and  r epre sen ts a b est- g u ess v alue  b ase d on theb r oa d  l it e rat ure. 

The  d iffe rence bet w een theIMB H C ULXsan d s t a ndard, st e l lar-mass B HCs  is s h o wn clearly in F i gu r e 1.
 bolometric_luminosity —

  

is_a few times higher_than the_0.5–10.0 keV_luminosity. In_some_cases, the published_disk temperatures were_“effective temperatures” — converted_from “color temperatures”_by_application of a color correction factor, which attempts to account for effects such as_spectral_hardening from_radiative_transfer_through a disk (Shimura &_Takahara 1995; Merloni, Fabian, &_Ross 2000;_Makishima et al. 2000). In these cases, we converted_the_effective temperature to_a color temperature. Color temperatures are compared directly to_color temperatures in this work. This_introduces no significant_temperature_bias;_a recent study has_shown that the correction factor for_IMBHs should be very similar to_that sometimes applied to stellar-mass black holes_(Fabian, Miller, & Ross 2004).

The lower_energy bound of the 0.5–10.0 keV_range is_somewhat higher than the present_lower energy bounds_of [*Chandra*]{}_and [*XMM-Newton*]{}; however,_history suggests that as all X-ray_detectors age, the_lower energy bound gradually increases. This_range_was chosen to_be_forward–looking,_and to_avoid any biases_inherent_in relying_too_heavily on the lowest bins in_the_[*Chandra*]{} and [*XMM-Newton*]{} bandpasses.

To understand the properties_of the ULX sources_within_the context of BHCs_in their brightest states, we_plotted the luminosity and disk temperature_of each_ULX, and_the corresponding data for the five most luminous observations of each_BHC in our sample (see Figure_1). In selecting the_brightest BHC_observations,_we are attempting_to_select those_phases wherein each source is closest to_its Eddington_luminosity. In all cases, the errors_on the disk color_temperatures_are 90% confidence errors. For the_ULX sources, the luminosity errors are_the 90% confidence errors in_the_measured_flux. A review of the_literature shows that constraints on the_distance to given_Galactic sources can change considerably over time_with_refined measurements, especially when extinction is_particularly_high. To be conservative, the luminosity_errors_on_the stellar–mass black holes were_set by taking the best-fit measured_flux, and enforcing fractional errors of $\pm 30$%. This_value is somewhat_arbitrary, but certainly greater than_most_quoted_errors, and represents a best-guess value based on the broad_literature.

The difference_between the IMBHC_ULXs and standard, stellar-mass BHCs is shown clearly in Figure_1.