sim \, 10^{51}$ erg s$^{-1}$).

Neutrino conversions in GRB
===========================

Flavor oscillations
-------------------

In the framework of three flavor analysis, the flavor precession probability from $\alpha $ to $\beta $ neutrino flavor is [@book]

$$P(\nu_{\alpha}\rightarrow \nu_{\beta})  \equiv P_{\alpha \beta}  = 
 \sum^{3}_{i=1}|U_{\alpha i}|^{2}|U_{\beta i}|^{2}
 +\sum_{i \neq j} U_{\alpha i}U^{\ast}_{\beta i}
                        U^{\ast}_{\alpha j}U_{\beta j}
                        \cos\left(\frac{2\pi L}{l_{ij}}\right),
\label{3flvp}$$

where $\alpha, \beta = e, \mu, $ or $\tau $. $U$ is the 3$\times $3 MNS mixing matrix and can be obtained in usual notation through $$U\, \equiv R_{23}(\theta_{1})
 \mbox{diag}(e^{-i\delta /2},1,e^{i\delta /2})  
 R_{31}(\theta_{2}) \mbox{diag}(e^{i\delta /2},1,e^{-i\delta /2})
       R_{12}(\theta_{3}),
\label{defU}$$ thus coinciding with the standard form given by the Particle Data Group [@pdg]. In Eq. (\[defU\]), $l_{ij}\simeq 4\pi E/
\delta m^{2}_{ij}$ with $\delta m^{2}_{ij} \equiv |m^{2}_{i}-m^{2}_{j}|$ and $L$ is the distance between the source and the detector. For simplicity, we will assume here a vanishing value for $\theta_{31}$ and CP violating phase $\delta $ in $U$.

At present, the atmospheric muon and solar electron neutrino deficits can be explained with oscillations among three active neutrinos [@RECENT]. For this, typically, $\delta m^{2}
\sim {\cal O}(10^{-3})$ eV$^{2}$ and $\sin^{2}2\theta \sim {\cal O}(1)$ for the explanation of atmospheric muon neutrino deficit, whereas for the explanation of solar electron neutrino deficit, we may have $\delta m^{2}
sim \, 10^{51}$ erg s$^{-1}$). 

 Neutrino conversions in GRB 
 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 

 Flavor oscillations 
 ------------------- 

 In the framework of three spirit psychoanalysis, the flavor precession probability from $ \alpha $ to $ \beta $ neutrino flavor is [ @book ] 

 $ $ P(\nu_{\alpha}\rightarrow \nu_{\beta })   \equiv P_{\alpha \beta }   = 
  \sum^{3}_{i=1}|U_{\alpha i}|^{2}|U_{\beta i}|^{2 } 
  + \sum_{i \neq j } U_{\alpha i}U^{\ast}_{\beta iodine } 
                         U^{\ast}_{\alpha j}U_{\beta j } 
                         \cos\left(\frac{2\pi L}{l_{ij}}\right), 
 \label{3flvp}$$ 

 where $ \alpha, \beta = e, \mu, $ or $ \tau $. $ U$ is the 3$\times $ 3 MNS desegregate matrix and can be obtained in usual note through $ $ U\, \equiv R_{23}(\theta_{1 }) 
  \mbox{diag}(e^{-i\delta /2},1,e^{i\delta /2 })  
  R_{31}(\theta_{2 }) \mbox{diag}(e^{i\delta /2},1,e^{-i\delta /2 }) 
        R_{12}(\theta_{3 }), 
 \label{defU}$$ thus coinciding with the standard form contribute by the Particle Data Group [ @pdg ]. In Eq. (\[defU\ ]), $ l_{ij}\simeq 4\pi E/ 
 \delta m^{2}_{ij}$ with $ \delta m^{2}_{ij } \equiv |m^{2}_{i}-m^{2}_{j}|$ and $ L$ is the distance between the source and the detector. For simplicity, we will wear here a vanishing value for $ \theta_{31}$ and CP violating phase $ \delta $ in $ U$. 

 At present, the atmospheric muon and solar electron neutrino deficits can be excuse with oscillations among three active neutrinos [ @RECENT ]. For this, typically, $ \delta m^{2 } 
 \sim { \cal O}(10^{-3})$ eV$^{2}$ and $ \sin^{2}2\theta \sim { \cal O}(1)$ for the explanation of atmospheric muon neutrino deficit, whereas for the explanation of solar electron neutrino deficit, we may have $ \delta m^{2 }
sim \, 10^{51}$ erg s$^{-1}$).

Neutrino converslons in GRB
===========================

Flavot iscilletions
-------------------

Ih the frxmework of three flavor analbsis, the dlavor precession probxbility fgom $\alpha $ to $\veta $ neutcjno flayjr ia [@boon]

$$'(\nu_{\alpha}\rightartow \nu_{\beta})  \aquiv P_{\alpha \batx}  = 
 \sum^{3}_{i=1}|U_{\alpha i}|^{2}|U_{\beta i}|^{2}
 +\sum_{i \neq j} U_{\wlpha i}I^{\adt}_{\beta i}
                        U^{\ast}_{\alpha j}U_{\beta j}
                        \cos\keft(\frac{2\pi L}{l_{ij}}\right),
\label{3fpvp}$$

wjere $\alpha, \beta = e, \mu, $ or $\tau $. $U$ yw the 3$\times $3 MNS mixing matrix and can be obtained in usual notatkon tkrough $$U\, \eqonc R_{23}(\hveta_{1})
 \mbox{dieg}(e^{-i\dejta /2},1,e^{i\delta /2})  
 R_{31}(\thetd_{2}) \mbox{doag}(e^{i\delta /2},1,e^{-i\dclta /2})
       R_{12}(\theta_{3}),
\label{defU}$$ tius coinciding with jhe standasd form given by thw Partiwle Gata Trojp [@kdg]. Ih Eq. (\[dffU\]), $l_{ij}\simeq 4\li E/
\delta m^{2}_{uj}$ with $\delta m^{2}_{ij} \eauyn |m^{2}_{i}-m^{2}_{j}|$ and $L$ js the dystance between the source and the detebtor. For simplicity, we will assume here a vanishlng value for $\theta_{31}$ and CP violating phase $\delta $ in $U$.

At psesenv, ghe abmosoyegic muon and solar electron neutrino deficits dam ne explained witm oscillations amomg tntee active neujrinos [@XSCSNT]. For this, typicwlly, $\dejta m^{2}
\wim {\cal O}(10^{-3})$ eV$^{2}$ snd $\sin^{2}2\theta \sim {\cal O}(1)$ for rhe explanatpon if atmospheric muou neutrino dzficit, wherras for the explanation of aolar electgon neutrjvo deficit, we mah hsva $\delta m^{2}
sim \, 10^{51}$ erg s$^{-1}$). Neutrino conversions =========================== oscillations ------------------- the framework of precession from $\alpha $ $\beta $ neutrino is [@book] $$P(\nu_{\alpha}\rightarrow \nu_{\beta}) \equiv P_{\alpha = \sum^{3}_{i=1}|U_{\alpha i}|^{2}|U_{\beta i}|^{2} +\sum_{i \neq j} U_{\alpha i}U^{\ast}_{\beta i} U^{\ast}_{\alpha j}U_{\beta j} L}{l_{ij}}\right), \label{3flvp}$$ where $\alpha, \beta = e, \mu, $ or $\tau $. $U$ the $3 mixing and can be obtained in usual notation through $$U\, \equiv R_{23}(\theta_{1}) \mbox{diag}(e^{-i\delta /2},1,e^{i\delta /2}) R_{31}(\theta_{2}) \mbox{diag}(e^{i\delta /2}) R_{12}(\theta_{3}), \label{defU}$$ thus coinciding with the standard given by the Particle Group [@pdg]. In Eq. (\[defU\]), 4\pi \delta m^{2}_{ij}$ $\delta \equiv and $L$ is distance between the source and the detector. For simplicity, we will assume here a vanishing value for and CP $\delta $ $U$. present, atmospheric muon and neutrino deficits can be explained with active neutrinos [@RECENT]. For this, typically, $\delta m^{2} {\cal O}(10^{-3})$ and $\sin^{2}2\theta \sim {\cal O}(1)$ for explanation of atmospheric muon neutrino deficit, whereas for explanation of solar electron neutrino deficit, we may have $\delta m^{2}
sim \, 10^{51}$ erg s$^{-1}$).

Neutrino conversionS in GRB
===========================

FlavOr oscIllAtiOnS
-------------------

In tHe frAmework of three FLavoR analysis, the flavor precEssioN pRObabILiTy froM $\alpha $ tO $\BeTA $ NeuTrInO flAvOR iS [@book]

$$p(\nu_{\Alpha}\riGhtarrow \nu_{\BetA})  \eQuiv P_{\alpha \beTA}  = 
 \sUm^{3}_{i=1}|U_{\alpha i}|^{2}|u_{\beTa i}|^{2}
 +\sum_{i \neq j} U_{\AlpHa i}U^{\asT}_{\bEta I}
                        u^{\ast}_{\aLphA j}U_{\beTa j}
                        \cos\LEft(\fraC{2\pi L}{l_{ij}}\riGhT),
\Label{3fLVp}$$

where $\ALPhA, \betA = e, \mu, $ or $\tau $. $U$ is the 3$\tiMEs $3 mnS mixing matrix And can Be OBtAINed In uSual notatiOn ThrouGH $$U\, \equiv r_{23}(\ThETA_{1})
 \MboX{Diag}(e^{-i\delta /2},1,e^{i\Delta /2})  
 R_{31}(\theta_{2}) \MBox{Diag}(e^{i\DeLta /2},1,E^{-I\delta /2})
       r_{12}(\thetA_{3}),
\lABel{DefU}$$ thus coiNcidIng with thE standARd form gIVen by thE PartiCle datA GroUP [@pDg]. in EQ. (\[dEFU\]), $l_{IJ}\sImeQ 4\Pi E/
\Delta m^{2}_{ij}$ WiTh $\Delta M^{2}_{ij} \eQUIV |M^{2}_{i}-m^{2}_{j}|$ And $l$ is tHe disTance between tHe sOurcE And The deTectoR. For SiMplicIty, we wIll asSuMe here a vanishinG valUe for $\thetA_{31}$ anD Cp viOlAting PHase $\deLta $ In $U$.

at preseNt, the atMOspHeRIC MuOn and solar electron NeUTRiNo deficiTs can bE ExPlAIned with OsCilLatiONS amonG thrEE aCtive neuTrinos [@reCeNt]. For thiS, tYpicalLy, $\DelTa m^{2}
\Sim {\caL o}(10^{-3})$ eV$^{2}$ aNd $\sin^{2}2\tHeta \sim {\cAl O}(1)$ foR The explanation OF atmospheric mUOn NEUtRIno dEfiCit, whereas fOr thE ExplAnatIOn Of sOLar elEctroN nEUtRIno deficit, we may have $\DeLta m^{2}
sim \, 10^{51}$ erg s$^{-1 }$).

Neut rinocon ver si onsin G RB
=========== = ==== ===========

Flavor os cilla ti o ns
- - -- ----- ------- - -- Inth efra me w or k ofthr ee flav or analysi s,th e flavor pre c es sion proba bil ity from $\a lph a $ to  $ \be t a $ n eut rinoflavor is [@b ook]

$$P (\ n u_{\al p ha}\rig h t ar row\nu_{\beta})  \eq u iv P_{\alpha \bet a}  =
\ su m ^ {3} _{i =1}|U_{\al ph a i}| ^ {2}|U_{ \ be t a i}| ^ {2}
 +\sum_{i  \neq j} U_ { \al pha i} U^ {\a s t}_{\b eta i }                    U^{\ ast}_{ \ alpha j } U_{\bet a j}
              \ c os \le f t(\ frac{2\p iL} {l_{i j}}\ r i g h t),\la bel{ 3flvp }$$

where $\ alp ha,\ bet a = e , \mu , $or  $\ta u $. $ U$ is  t he 3$\times $3MNSmixing ma tri xand  c an be obtain edinusual n otation thr ou g h $$ U\, \equiv R_{23}( \t h e ta _{1})
 \ mbox{d i ag }( e ^{-i\del ta  /2 },1, e ^ {i\de lta/ 2} )  
 R_{ 31}(\t h et a_ {2}) \m bo x{diag }( e^{ i\d elta/ 2},1 ,e^{-i \delta / 2})
     R_{12}(\t h eta_{3}),
\la b el { d ef U }$$thu s coincidin g wi t h th e st a nd ard formgiven  b y  t h e Particle Data Gro up  [@pdg ]. In  Eq. (\[defU\ ]), $l_{ij } \ s imeq 4\p i E/ \d e lta m^{2}_{ij} $ wit h $\deltam ^{2}_{ij } \eq uiv |m^{ 2}_{i}-m^ { 2 }_{j}|$and  $L $ i s t h e  d istance betwe e n  the  s ource a ndthe det ect or.  Fo r s im plicity,we willas su me  h ere  a va n ishing v al uefo r $ \thet a _{31}$  andCP v io la t ing  phase$ \d e l ta $  i n$U$. 

A tprese nt,t heatmosph eric muon  an d  sol ar  e lectron  neutrino def ic its can be  e xpl ainedw i th oscil lations among three act i ve neut rin os [@ RECE NT]. Forthi s, typ ica l ly, $\ deltam^{2} 
\ sim { \calO } (1 0^{ -3 })$ eV$^{2 } $  an d $\s in ^{2} 2\theta  \sim {\cal O}(1)$ for  the explanat ion  ofa t mo sph e ri c  mu on neu t r ino deficit, wh ereas forth e  e xplanation ofso lar ele ctron n eutri n o defic it, we ma y have $\ de ltam ^ {2} 
sim \,_10^{51}$ erg_s$^{-1}$).

Neutrino conversions in GRB
===========================

Flavor_oscillations
-------------------

In the_framework_of three_flavor_analysis, the flavor_precession probability from_$\alpha $ to $\beta_$ neutrino flavor_is_[@book]

$$P(\nu_{\alpha}\rightarrow \nu_{\beta})  \equiv P_{\alpha \beta}  = 
 \sum^{3}_{i=1}|U_{\alpha i}|^{2}|U_{\beta i}|^{2}
 +\sum_{i \neq_j}_U_{\alpha i}U^{\ast}_{\beta_i}
__    _    _ _       __ U^{\ast}_{\alpha j}U_{\beta_j}
        _     _  ___   _\cos\left(\frac{2\pi L}{l_{ij}}\right),
\label{3flvp}$$

where $\alpha, \beta = e,_\mu, $ or $\tau $. $U$_is the 3$\times $3 MNS mixing matrix_and can be obtained in usual_notation through $$U\, \equiv R_{23}(\theta_{1})
_\mbox{diag}(e^{-i\delta /2},1,e^{i\delta_/2})  
 R_{31}(\theta_{2}) \mbox{diag}(e^{i\delta_/2},1,e^{-i\delta /2})
 _ _  _R_{12}(\theta_{3}),
\label{defU}$$ thus coinciding with the standard_form given by_the Particle Data Group [@pdg]. In_Eq._(\[defU\]), $l_{ij}\simeq 4\pi_E/
\delta_m^{2}_{ij}$_with $\delta_m^{2}_{ij} \equiv |m^{2}_{i}-m^{2}_{j}|$_and_$L$ is_the_distance between the source and the_detector._For simplicity, we will assume here a_vanishing value for $\theta_{31}$_and_CP violating phase $\delta_$ in $U$.

At present, the_atmospheric muon and solar electron neutrino_deficits can_be explained_with oscillations among three active neutrinos [@RECENT]. For this, typically, $\delta_m^{2}
\sim {\cal O}(10^{-3})$ eV$^{2}$ and $\sin^{2}2\theta_\sim {\cal O}(1)$ for_the explanation_of_atmospheric muon neutrino_deficit,_whereas for_the explanation of solar electron neutrino deficit,_we may_have $\delta m^{2}