r = r_{\operatorname{\mathfrak{w}}}$.

-   Let $\sigma$ be any ${\mathbb{C}}[z]$–linear automorphism of $\operatorname{\mathfrak{g}}[z]$ and $\operatorname{\mathfrak{u}}= \sigma(\operatorname{\mathfrak{w}}) \subset \widehat\operatorname{\mathfrak{g}}$ be the transformed order. Then the solutions $r_{\operatorname{\mathfrak{w}}}$ and $r_{\operatorname{\mathfrak{u}}}$ are gauge-equivalent: $$r_{\operatorname{\mathfrak{u}}}(x, y) = \bigl(\sigma(x) \otimes \sigma(y)\bigr) r_{\operatorname{\mathfrak{w}}}(x, y).$$

-   The described correspondence $\operatorname{\mathfrak{w}}\mapsto r_{\operatorname{\mathfrak{w}}}$ provides a bijection between the gauge equivalence classes of rational solutions of (\[eq:CYBE\]) satisfying (\[E:AnsatzStolin\]) and the orbits of Lagrangian orders in $\widehat\operatorname{\mathfrak{g}}$ with respect to the action of of $\operatorname{\mathsf{Aut}}_{{\mathbb{C}}[z]}\bigl(\operatorname{\mathfrak{g}}[z]\bigr)$.

Let $\operatorname{\mathfrak{w}}= z^{-1} \operatorname{\mathfrak{g}}\llbracket z^{-1}\rrbracket$. It is easy to see that $\operatorname{\mathfrak{w}}$ is a Lagrangian order in $\widehat\operatorname{\mathfrak{g}}$. Let $\bigl\{\alpha_l\bigr\}_{l = 1}^{n^2-1}$ be any basis of $\operatorname{\mathfrak{g}}$. Then we have: $
\beta_{l, k} :=  \bigl(\alpha_l z^k\bigr)^\vee = \alpha_l^\vee z^{-k-1}.
$ This implies: $$r_{\operatorname{\mathfrak{w}}}(x, y) =
\sum\limits_{k=0}^\infty x^k \sum\limits_{l = 1}^{n^2-1} \alpha_l \otimes \alpha_l^\vee y^{-k-1}
= \frac{c}{y-x},$$ where $c \in \operatorname{\mathfrak{g}}\otimes \operatorname{\mathfrak{g}}$ is the Casimir element. The tensor-valued function $r_{\operatorname{\mathfrak{w}}}$ is the celebrated Yang’s solution of the classical Yang–Baxter equation (\[eq:CYBE\]).

\[
r = r_{\operatorname{\mathfrak{w}}}$. 

 -    Let $ \sigma$ be any $ { \mathbb{C}}[z]$–linear automorphism of $ \operatorname{\mathfrak{g}}[z]$ and $ \operatorname{\mathfrak{u}}= \sigma(\operatorname{\mathfrak{w } }) \subset \widehat\operatorname{\mathfrak{g}}$ be the transformed order. Then the solution $ r_{\operatorname{\mathfrak{w}}}$ and $ r_{\operatorname{\mathfrak{u}}}$ are bore - equivalent: $ $ r_{\operatorname{\mathfrak{u}}}(x, y) = \bigl(\sigma(x) \otimes \sigma(y)\bigr) r_{\operatorname{\mathfrak{w}}}(x, y).$$ 

 -    The described correspondence $ \operatorname{\mathfrak{w}}\mapsto r_{\operatorname{\mathfrak{w}}}$ provide a bijection between the bore equivalence classes of rational solution of (\[eq: CYBE\ ]) satisfying (\[E: AnsatzStolin\ ]) and the orbits of Lagrangian orders in $ \widehat\operatorname{\mathfrak{g}}$ with esteem to the action of of $ \operatorname{\mathsf{Aut}}_{{\mathbb{C}}[z]}\bigl(\operatorname{\mathfrak{g}}[z]\bigr)$. 

 Let $ \operatorname{\mathfrak{w}}= z^{-1 } \operatorname{\mathfrak{g}}\llbracket z^{-1}\rrbracket$. It is comfortable to see that $ \operatorname{\mathfrak{w}}$ is a Lagrangian order in $ \widehat\operatorname{\mathfrak{g}}$. Let $ \bigl\{\alpha_l\bigr\}_{l = 1}^{n^2 - 1}$ be any basis of $ \operatorname{\mathfrak{g}}$. Then we accept: $ 
 \beta_{l, k }: =   \bigl(\alpha_l z^k\bigr)^\vee = \alpha_l^\vee z^{-k-1 }. 
 $ This implies: $ $ r_{\operatorname{\mathfrak{w}}}(x, y) = 
 \sum\limits_{k=0}^\infty x^k \sum\limits_{l = 1}^{n^2 - 1 } \alpha_l \otimes \alpha_l^\vee y^{-k-1 } 
 = \frac{c}{y - x},$$ where $ c \in \operatorname{\mathfrak{g}}\otimes \operatorname{\mathfrak{g}}$ is the Casimir element. The tensor - valued function $ r_{\operatorname{\mathfrak{w}}}$ is the celebrated Yang ’s solution of the authoritative Yang – Baxter equation (\[eq: CYBE\ ]). 

 \ [
r = g_{\operatorname{\mathfrak{w}}}$.

-   Let $\sigma$ be aut ${\mathub{C}}[z]$–linsar autooorphism of $\operatorname{\mathhrak{t}}[z]$ ane $\operatorname{\mathfrak{j}}= \sigma(\opvratornamw{\matifrak{w}}) \subset \wivshat\opevctornzle{\machhrak{g}}$ be the trsnsformed mrder. Then the sulbtions $r_{\operatorname{\mathfrak{w}}}$ and $r_{\o[eratormale{\mathfrak{u}}}$ arg gaubq-equjnaoent: $$r_{\operatorname{\mathfrak{u}}}(x, g) = \bigl(\vigma(x) \otimes \sigma(y)\bigr) r_{\operatorname{\mwthfgak{w}}}(x, y).$$

-   The descgibed correwponqwnce $\operatofname{\mathfgck{w}}\mapsto r_{\kperatorname{\mathfrak{w}}}$ provides x bijzction betwgzb tjg gauge equitalencv classes of vstionan solutoons of (\[eq:CYBE\]) savisfting (\[E:AnsatzStolin\]) anv the orbits of Lagrwngian orgexs in $\widehat\operatorbane{\matvfran{g}}$ wkrh feskecv tk the wctmon of of $\oleratorname{\nathsf{Aut}}_{{\mathbb{C}}[z]}\bibl(\jirratorname{\mafhfrak{d}}[z]\figr)$.

Let $\operatorname{\mathfrak{w}}= z^{-1} \operatognams{\mathfrak{g}}\llbracket z^{-1}\rrvracket$. It is easy to see that $\operatorname{\mathfrak{w}}$ is a Lagrangian order in $\whdehav\ooercbjfbale{\mathfrak{g}}$. Let $\bigl\{\alpha_l\bigr\}_{l = 1}^{n^2-1}$ be any basya pf $\operatorname{\mcthfrak{g}}$. Then we hwvr: $
\beta_{l, k} :=  \biel(\alphc_m a^k\bigr)^\vee = \alpha_l^\vfe z^{-k-1}.
$ Tris inplies: $$r_{\okeratprname{\mathfrak{w}}}(x, y) =
\sum\limitw_{k=0}^\infty x^k \slm\linits_{l = 1}^{n^2-1} \alpha_l \otnmes \alpha_l^\vze y^{-k-1}
= \grac{c}{u-x},$$ where $c \in \operatorncme{\matgfrak{g}}\otimed \operatodvame{\mathfrak{g}}$ is thv Cavimir eltoent. The tensor-vajued funcvion $x_{\operatofnamg{\mathfrwk{w}}}$ is the celensated Yang’s solutiln of tve classicwl Yang–Baxter equation (\[eq:CYBE\]).

\[
r = r_{\operatorname{\mathfrak{w}}}$. - Let $\sigma$ be automorphism $\operatorname{\mathfrak{g}}[z]$ and \sigma(\operatorname{\mathfrak{w}}) \subset \widehat\operatorname{\mathfrak{g}}$ the $r_{\operatorname{\mathfrak{w}}}$ and $r_{\operatorname{\mathfrak{u}}}$ gauge-equivalent: $$r_{\operatorname{\mathfrak{u}}}(x, y) \bigl(\sigma(x) \otimes \sigma(y)\bigr) r_{\operatorname{\mathfrak{w}}}(x, y).$$ - described correspondence $\operatorname{\mathfrak{w}}\mapsto r_{\operatorname{\mathfrak{w}}}$ provides a bijection between the gauge equivalence classes of solutions of (\[eq:CYBE\]) satisfying (\[E:AnsatzStolin\]) and the orbits of Lagrangian orders in $\widehat\operatorname{\mathfrak{g}}$ respect the of $\operatorname{\mathsf{Aut}}_{{\mathbb{C}}[z]}\bigl(\operatorname{\mathfrak{g}}[z]\bigr)$. Let $\operatorname{\mathfrak{w}}= z^{-1} \operatorname{\mathfrak{g}}\llbracket z^{-1}\rrbracket$. It is easy to see that $\operatorname{\mathfrak{w}}$ is a Lagrangian in $\widehat\operatorname{\mathfrak{g}}$. Let $\bigl\{\alpha_l\bigr\}_{l = 1}^{n^2-1}$ be any of $\operatorname{\mathfrak{g}}$. Then we $ \beta_{l, k} := \bigl(\alpha_l = z^{-k-1}. $ implies: y) \sum\limits_{k=0}^\infty x^k \sum\limits_{l 1}^{n^2-1} \alpha_l \otimes \alpha_l^\vee y^{-k-1} = \frac{c}{y-x},$$ where $c \in \operatorname{\mathfrak{g}}\otimes \operatorname{\mathfrak{g}}$ is the Casimir element. The function $r_{\operatorname{\mathfrak{w}}}$ celebrated Yang’s of classical equation (\[eq:CYBE\]). \[
r = r_{\operatorname{\mathfrak{w}}}$.

-   LeT $\sigma$ be anY ${\mathBb{C}}[Z]$–liNeAr auTomoRphism of $\operatORnamE{\mathfrak{g}}[z]$ and $\operatorName{\mAtHFrak{U}}= \SiGma(\opEratornAMe{\MAThfRaK{w}}) \SubSeT \WiDehat\OpeRatornaMe{\mathfrak{G}}$ be ThE transformed ORdEr. Then the sOluTions $r_{\operatOrnAme{\matHfRak{W}}}$ And $r_{\oPerAtornAme{\matHFrak{u}}}$ aRe gauge-eqUiVAlent: $$r_{\OPeratorNAMe{\MathFrak{u}}}(x, y) = \bigl(\sigma(x) \OTiMEs \sigma(y)\bigr) r_{\oPeratoRnAMe{\MAThfRak{W}}}(x, y).$$

-   The descRiBed coRRespondENcE $\OPEraTOrname{\mathfraK{w}}\mapsto r_{\opERatOrname{\MaThfRAk{w}}}$ proVides A bIJecTion between The gAuge equivAlence CLasses oF RationaL solutIonS of (\[Eq:CYbe\]) sAtIsfYiNG (\[E:ANSaTzSTOliN\]) and the oRbItS of LaGranGIAN OrdeRs iN $\widEhat\oPeratorname{\maThfRak{g}}$ WIth RespeCt to tHe acTiOn of oF $\operaTornaMe{\Mathsf{Aut}}_{{\mathbb{c}}[z]}\biGl(\operatoRnaMe{\MatHfRak{g}}[z]\BIgr)$.

Let $\OpeRatOrname{\mAthfrak{W}}= Z^{-1} \opErATORnAme{\mathfrak{g}}\llbracKeT Z^{-1}\RrBracket$. IT is easY To SeE That $\operAtOrnAme{\mATHfrak{W}}$ is a lAgRangian oRder in $\WIdEhAt\operaToRname{\mAtHfrAk{g}}$. let $\biGL\{\alpHa_l\bigR\}_{l = 1}^{n^2-1}$ be any Basis OF $\operatorname{\mAThfrak{g}}$. Then we HAvE: $
\BEtA_{L, k} :=  \biGl(\aLpha_l z^k\bigr)^\Vee = \aLPha_l^\Vee z^{-K-1}.
$ thIs iMPlies: $$R_{\operAtORnAMe{\mathfrak{w}}}(x, y) =
\sum\limItS_{k=0}^\inftY x^k \suM\limits_{l = 1}^{n^2-1} \alphA_l \otimes \alPHA_L^\vee y^{-k-1}
= \frAc{c}{y-X},$$ WhERe $c \in \operatornAme{\maThfrak{g}}\otiMEs \operatOrnamE{\mathfraK{g}}$ is the CaSIMir elemeNt. THe tEnsOr-vALUeD function $r_{\opeRATornAmE{\mathfrAk{w}}}$ Is the ceLebRatEd YAng’S sOlution of The classIcAl yaNg–baxTer eqUAtion (\[eq:CyBe\]).

\[
r = r_{\operatorname{\math frak{w}}}$ .

-  L et$\ sigm a$ b e any ${\mathb b {C}} [z]$–linear automorphi sm of  $ \ oper a to rname {\mathf r ak { g }}[ z] $and  $ \ op erato rna me{\mat hfrak{u}}=  \s ig ma(\operator n am e{\mathfra k{w }}) \subset\wi dehat\ op era t ornam e{\ mathf rak{g} } $ be t he transf or m ed ord e r. Then t he  sol utions $r_{\opera t or n ame{\mathfrak{ w}}}$an d  $ r _ {\o per atorname{\ ma thfra k {u}}}$a re g a uge - equivalent: $ $r_{\operat o rna me{\ma th fra k {u}}}( x, y)  = \bi gl(\sigma(x ) \o times \si gma(y) \ bigr) r _ {\opera tornam e{\ mat hfra k {w }} }(x ,y ).$ $ 
- The  describ ed  c orres pond e n c e  $\o per ator name{ \mathfrak{w}} \ma psto r_{ \oper atorn ame{ \m athfr ak{w}} }$ pr ov ides a bijectio n be tween the  ga ug e e qu ivale n ce cla sse s o f ratio nal sol u tio ns o f  ( \[eq:CYBE\]) satis fy i n g(\[E:Ans atzSto l in \] )  and the  o rbi ts o f Lagra ngia n  o rders in  $\wid e ha t\ operato rn ame{\m at hfr ak{ g}}$w ithrespec t to the  acti o n of of $\oper a torname{\math s f{ A u t} } _{{\ mat hbb{C}}[z]} \big l (\op erat o rn ame { \math frak{ g} } [z ] \bigr)$.

Let $\ope ra tornam e{\ma thfrak{w}}= z ^{-1} \ope r a t orname{\ math f ra k {g}}\llbracket  z^{- 1}\rrbrack e t$. It i s eas y to see  that $\o p e ratornam e{\ mat hfr ak{ w } }$  is a Lagrang i a n or de r in $\ wid ehat\op era tor nam e{\ ma thfrak{g} }$. Let$\ bi gl \{ \al pha_l \ bigr\}_{ l= 1 }^ {n^ 2-1}$ be any  basi s of  $ \o p era torname { \m a t hfra k{ g} }$.The nwe ha ve:$ 
\b eta_{l,  k} :=  \ big l (\al ph a_ l z^k\b igr)^\vee = \ al pha_l^\vee  z ^{- k-1}.$ This imp lies: $$r_{\operatornam e {\mathf rak {w}}} (x,y) =
\sum \li mits_{ k=0 } ^\inft y x^k\sum\ li mit s _ {l =1 } ^{ n^2 -1 } \alpha_l \ oti mes \ al pha_ l^\veey^{-k-1}
= \frac{c } {y- x},$$ where $ c \ in \ o p er ato r na m e{\ ma t hfr a k {g}}\otimes \op eratorname {\ m at hfrak{g}}$ isth e Casim ir elem ent.T he tens or-valued  function  $ r_{\ o p era torname{\m athfrak{ w}}}$ ist he ce l eb rated  Ya ng’s s ol uti on of  the c l ass icalYang–B ax ter eq uatio n(\[eq:CY BE\]).

\[
r =_r_{\operatorname{\mathfrak{w}}}$.

- _ Let $\sigma$ be_any ${\mathbb{C}}[z]$–linear_automorphism_of $\operatorname{\mathfrak{g}}[z]$_and_$\operatorname{\mathfrak{u}}= \sigma(\operatorname{\mathfrak{w}}) \subset_\widehat\operatorname{\mathfrak{g}}$ be the_transformed order. Then the_solutions $r_{\operatorname{\mathfrak{w}}}$ and_$r_{\operatorname{\mathfrak{u}}}$_are gauge-equivalent: $$r_{\operatorname{\mathfrak{u}}}(x, y) = \bigl(\sigma(x) \otimes \sigma(y)\bigr) r_{\operatorname{\mathfrak{w}}}(x, y).$$

-   The described_correspondence_$\operatorname{\mathfrak{w}}\mapsto r_{\operatorname{\mathfrak{w}}}$_provides_a_bijection between the gauge equivalence_classes of rational solutions of_(\[eq:CYBE\]) satisfying_(\[E:AnsatzStolin\]) and the orbits of Lagrangian orders in_$\widehat\operatorname{\mathfrak{g}}$_with respect to_the action of of $\operatorname{\mathsf{Aut}}_{{\mathbb{C}}[z]}\bigl(\operatorname{\mathfrak{g}}[z]\bigr)$.

Let $\operatorname{\mathfrak{w}}= z^{-1} \operatorname{\mathfrak{g}}\llbracket z^{-1}\rrbracket$._It is easy to see that_$\operatorname{\mathfrak{w}}$ is a_Lagrangian_order_in $\widehat\operatorname{\mathfrak{g}}$. Let $\bigl\{\alpha_l\bigr\}_{l_= 1}^{n^2-1}$ be any basis of_$\operatorname{\mathfrak{g}}$. Then we have: $
\beta_{l, k}_:=  \bigl(\alpha_l z^k\bigr)^\vee = \alpha_l^\vee z^{-k-1}.
$_This implies: $$r_{\operatorname{\mathfrak{w}}}(x, y) =
\sum\limits_{k=0}^\infty x^k_\sum\limits_{l = 1}^{n^2-1} \alpha_l \otimes_\alpha_l^\vee y^{-k-1}
=_\frac{c}{y-x},$$ where $c \in \operatorname{\mathfrak{g}}\otimes_\operatorname{\mathfrak{g}}$ is the_Casimir element._The tensor-valued function_$r_{\operatorname{\mathfrak{w}}}$ is the celebrated Yang’s solution_of the classical_Yang–Baxter equation (\[eq:CYBE\]).

\[