mathcal{E}^4k_{\bot}^2}{2\omega_2^2\mathcal{N}}|\mathbf{k}|^2\Big[&+(4k_{\parallel}^2+k_{\bot}^2)\omega_2^4+4\mathcal{E}k_{\parallel}k_{\bot}^2\omega_2^3+\big(4k_{\parallel}^4+2k_{\bot}^2k_{\parallel}^2+(\mathcal{E}^2-2)k_{\bot}^4\big)\omega_2^2
\notag \\
&+4\mathcal{E}k_{\parallel}k_{\bot}^2|\mathbf{k}|^2\omega_2+k_{\bot}^2|\mathbf{k}|^2(|\mathbf{k}|^2+\mathcal{E}^2k_{\bot}^2)\Big]\,.\end{aligned}$$ where $$\mathcal{N}=|\boldsymbol{\varepsilon}^{(2)}|^2-(\varepsilon^0)^2\,,$$

and $\omega_2=\omega_2(k_{\bot},k_{\|})$ is given by. Again, if the tensor is contracted with a gauge-invariant expression, it can be replaced by $\Pi^{\mu\nu}|_{\lambda=2}$:

$$\overline{\varepsilon}^{(2)\,\mu}\varepsilon^{(2)\,\nu}\mapsto \Pi^{\mu\nu}|_{\lambda=2}\,,$$

$$\begin{aligned}
\label{eq:polarization-sum-parity-violating-2-truncated}
\Pi^{\mu\nu}|_{\lambda=2}&\equiv \overline{\varepsilon}^{(2)\,\mu}\varepsilon^{(2)\,\nu}
\;\big|^\text{truncated} \notag \\
&=\frac{1}{N''}\Big\{\widehat{\Phi}_2\xi^{\mu}\xi^{\nu}
+\widehat{\Psi}_2\zeta^{\mu}\zeta^{\nu}+\widehat{\Theta}_2(\xi^{\mu}\zeta^{\nu}
+\zeta^{\mu}\xi^{\nu})\Big\}\,\,\Big|_{k_0=\omega_2}\,.\end{aligned}$$

Finally it holds that $$k_{\mu}\left(\overline{\varepsilon}^{(1)\,\mu}\varepsilon^{(1)\,\nu}\right)(k)=0\,,\quad \lim_{\mathcal{E}\mapsto 0} k_{\mu}\left(\overline{\varepsilon}^{(2)\,\mu}\
mathcal{E}^4k_{\bot}^2}{2\omega_2 ^ 2\mathcal{N}}|\mathbf{k}|^2\Big[&+(4k_{\parallel}^2+k_{\bot}^2)\omega_2 ^ 4 + 4\mathcal{E}k_{\parallel}k_{\bot}^2\omega_2 ^ 3+\big(4k_{\parallel}^4 + 2k_{\bot}^2k_{\parallel}^2+(\mathcal{E}^2 - 2)k_{\bot}^4\big)\omega_2 ^ 2 
 \notag \\ 
 & +4\mathcal{E}k_{\parallel}k_{\bot}^2|\mathbf{k}|^2\omega_2+k_{\bot}^2|\mathbf{k}|^2(|\mathbf{k}|^2+\mathcal{E}^2k_{\bot}^2)\Big]\,.\end{aligned}$$ where $ $ \mathcal{N}=|\boldsymbol{\varepsilon}^{(2)}|^2-(\varepsilon^0)^2\,,$$ 

 and $ \omega_2=\omega_2(k_{\bot},k_{\|})$ is given by. Again, if the tensor is contracted with a gauge - invariant formula, it can be replace by $ \Pi^{\mu\nu}|_{\lambda=2}$: 

 $ $ \overline{\varepsilon}^{(2)\,\mu}\varepsilon^{(2)\,\nu}\mapsto \Pi^{\mu\nu}|_{\lambda=2}\,,$$ 

 $ $ \begin{aligned } 
 \label{eq: polarization - sum - parity - violating-2 - truncated } 
 \Pi^{\mu\nu}|_{\lambda=2}&\equiv \overline{\varepsilon}^{(2)\,\mu}\varepsilon^{(2)\,\nu } 
 \;\big|^\text{truncated } \notag \\ 
 & = \frac{1}{N''}\Big\{\widehat{\Phi}_2\xi^{\mu}\xi^{\nu } 
 + \widehat{\Psi}_2\zeta^{\mu}\zeta^{\nu}+\widehat{\Theta}_2(\xi^{\mu}\zeta^{\nu } 
 + \zeta^{\mu}\xi^{\nu})\Big\}\,\,\Big|_{k_0=\omega_2}\,.\end{aligned}$$ 

 last it holds that $ $ k_{\mu}\left(\overline{\varepsilon}^{(1)\,\mu}\varepsilon^{(1)\,\nu}\right)(k)=0\,,\quad \lim_{\mathcal{E}\mapsto 0 } k_{\mu}\left(\overline{\varepsilon}^{(2)\,\mu}\
matjcal{E}^4k_{\bot}^2}{2\omega_2^2\mathcal{N}}|\mauhbf{k}|^2\Big[&+(4k_{\parallel}^2+k_{\bot}^2)\omeja_2^4+4\mathczl{E}k_{\paraulel}k_{\bot}^2\omega_2^3+\big(4k_{\parallel}^4+2k_{\bov}^2k_{\paealleo}^2+(\mathcal{E}^2-2)k_{\bot}^4\big)\omega_2^2
\nutag \\
&+4\mathbal{E}k_{\paraolel}j_{\vot}^2|\mathbf{k}|^2\omega_2+k_{\bob}^2|\iathgn{k}|^2(|\matkbh{k}|^2+\mathcal{E}^2k_{\bot}^2)\Blg]\,.\end{aligneg}$$ where $$\mathcan{N}=|\copdsymbol{\varepsilon}^{(2)}|^2-(\varepsilon^0)^2\,,$$

and $\omeda_2=\omega_2(l_{\blt},k_{\|})$ is given bi. Agapn, if fhe tensor is contracted with a gahge-invagiant expression, ot can be replaced by $\Pi^{\mu\ju}|_{\lalbda=2}$:

$$\overline{\varepsllon}^{(2)\,\mu}\varepwilog^{(2)\,\bu}\mapsto \Pi^{\mj\nu}|_{\lambda=2}\,,$$

$$\btgnn{aligned}
\lagel{eq:polarization-sum-parity-violaging-2-txuncated}
\Pi^{\mo\uy}|_{\laltda=2}&\equiv \ovxrline{\narepsilon}^{(2)\,\mu}\varepsilot^{(2)\,\nu}
\;\big|^\trxt{truncated} \nptaj \\
&=\frqc{1}{N''}\Big\{\widehat{\Phi}_2\xi^{\mu}\xm^{\nu}
+\widehat{\Psi}_2\zeta^{\mu}\zgta^{\nu}+\widehdt{\Cheta}_2(\xi^{\mu}\zeta^{\nu}
+\zeta^{\mu}\zi^{\bu})\Big\}\,\,\Tig|_{k_0=\mmegx_2}\,.\wnd{xlifnxd}$$

Fjnally it holds thaf $$k_{\mu}\left(\ovwrline{\varepsilon}^{(1)\,\mu}\vsrqixilon^{(1)\,\nu}\right)(i)=0\,,\quad \jii_{\mathcal{E}\mapsto 0} k_{\mu}\left(\overline{\varepsinon}^{(2)\,\ju}\
mathcal{E}^4k_{\bot}^2}{2\omega_2^2\mathcal{N}}|\mathbf{k}|^2\Big[&+(4k_{\parallel}^2+k_{\bot}^2)\omega_2^4+4\mathcal{E}k_{\parallel}k_{\bot}^2\omega_2^3+\big(4k_{\parallel}^4+2k_{\bot}^2k_{\parallel}^2+(\mathcal{E}^2-2)k_{\bot}^4\big)\omega_2^2 \notag \\ &+4\mathcal{E}k_{\parallel}k_{\bot}^2|\mathbf{k}|^2\omega_2+k_{\bot}^2|\mathbf{k}|^2(|\mathbf{k}|^2+\mathcal{E}^2k_{\bot}^2)\Big]\,.\end{aligned}$$ where $$\mathcal{N}=|\boldsymbol{\varepsilon}^{(2)}|^2-(\varepsilon^0)^2\,,$$ and given Again, if tensor is contracted can replaced by $\Pi^{\mu\nu}|_{\lambda=2}$: \Pi^{\mu\nu}|_{\lambda=2}\,,$$ $$\begin{aligned} \label{eq:polarization-sum-parity-violating-2-truncated} \overline{\varepsilon}^{(2)\,\mu}\varepsilon^{(2)\,\nu} \;\big|^\text{truncated} \notag \\ &=\frac{1}{N''}\Big\{\widehat{\Phi}_2\xi^{\mu}\xi^{\nu} +\widehat{\Psi}_2\zeta^{\mu}\zeta^{\nu}+\widehat{\Theta}_2(\xi^{\mu}\zeta^{\nu} Finally it holds that $$k_{\mu}\left(\overline{\varepsilon}^{(1)\,\mu}\varepsilon^{(1)\,\nu}\right)(k)=0\,,\quad \lim_{\mathcal{E}\mapsto 0} k_{\mu}\left(\overline{\varepsilon}^{(2)\,\mu}\
mathcal{E}^4k_{\bot}^2}{2\omega_2^2\mathcal{N}}|\Mathbf{k}|^2\Big[&+(4K_{\paraLleL}^2+k_{\bOt}^2)\OmegA_2^4+4\matHcal{E}k_{\parallel}K_{\Bot}^2\oMega_2^3+\big(4k_{\parallel}^4+2k_{\bot}^2k_{\pArallEl}^2+(\MAthcAL{E}^2-2)K_{\bot}^4\bIg)\omega_2^2
\NOtAG \\
&+4\MatHcAl{e}k_{\pArALlEl}k_{\boT}^2|\maThbf{k}|^2\omEga_2+k_{\bot}^2|\matHbf{K}|^2(|\mAthbf{k}|^2+\mathcaL{e}^2k_{\Bot}^2)\Big]\,.\end{aLigNed}$$ where $$\mathCal{n}=|\boldsYmBol{\VArepsIloN}^{(2)}|^2-(\varePsilon^0)^2\,,$$

ANd $\omegA_2=\omega_2(k_{\boT},k_{\|})$ IS given BY. Again, iF THe TensOr is contracted witH A gAUge-invariant exPressiOn, IT cAN Be rEplAced by $\Pi^{\mu\Nu}|_{\LambdA=2}$:

$$\OverlinE{\VaREPSilON}^{(2)\,\mu}\varepsilon^{(2)\,\Nu}\mapsto \Pi^{\mU\Nu}|_{\lAmbda=2}\,,$$

$$\bEgIn{aLIgned}
\lAbel{eQ:pOLarIzation-sum-pAritY-violatinG-2-truncATed}
\Pi^{\mu\NU}|_{\lambda=2}&\Equiv \oVerLinE{\varEPsIlOn}^{(2)\,\mU}\vARepSIlOn^{(2)\,\nU}
\;\Big|^\Text{trunCaTeD} \notaG \\
&=\fraC{1}{n''}\bIG\{\widEhaT{\Phi}_2\Xi^{\mu}\xI^{\nu}
+\widehat{\Psi}_2\ZetA^{\mu}\zETa^{\nU}+\wideHat{\ThEta}_2(\xI^{\mU}\zeta^{\Nu}
+\zeta^{\Mu}\xi^{\nU})\BIg\}\,\,\Big|_{k_0=\omega_2}\,.\end{aLignEd}$$

Finally It hOlDs tHaT $$k_{\mu}\lEFt(\overLinE{\vaRepsiloN}^{(1)\,\mu}\varePSilOn^{(1)\,\NU}\RIgHt)(k)=0\,,\quad \lim_{\mathcal{E}\MaPSTo 0} K_{\mu}\left(\oVerlinE{\VaRePSilon}^{(2)\,\mu}\
mathcal{E}^4k_{\bot}^2}{2\ omega_2^2\ mathc al{ N}} |\ math bf{k }|^2\Big[&+(4k _ {\pa rallel}^2+k_{\bot}^2)\ omega _2 ^ 4+4\ m at hcal{ E}k_{\p a ra l l el} k_ {\ bot }^ 2 \o mega_ 2^3 +\big(4 k_{\parall el} ^4 +2k_{\bot}^2 k _{ \parallel} ^2+ (\mathcal{E} ^2- 2)k_{\ bo t}^ 4 \big) \om ega_2 ^2
\no t ag \\&+4\mathc al { E}k_{\ p arallel } k _{ \bot }^2|\mathbf{k}|^2 \ om e ga_2+k_{\bot}^ 2|\mat hb f {k } | ^2( |\m athbf{k}|^ 2+ \math c al{E}^2 k _{ \ b o t}^ 2 )\Big]\,.\end {aligned}$$ whe re $$\ ma thc a l{N}=| \bold sy m bol {\varepsilo n}^{ (2)}|^2-( \varep s ilon^0) ^ 2\,,$$
and $ \om ega _2=\ o me ga _2( k_ { \bo t }, k_{ \ |}) $ is giv en  b y. Ag ain, i f theten soris co ntracted with  agaug e -in varia nt ex pres si on, i t canbe re pl aced by $\Pi^{\ mu\n u}|_{\lam bda =2 }$: 
$$\ov e rline{ \va rep silon}^ {(2)\,\ m u}\ va r e p si lon^{(2)\,\nu}\map st o \P i^{\mu\n u}|_{\ l am bd a =2}\,,$$ 
$$\ begi n { align ed}\ la bel{eq:p olariz a ti on -sum-pa ri ty-vio la tin g-2 -trun c ated }
\Pi^ {\mu\nu} |_{\l a mbda=2}&\equiv \overline{\va r ep s i lo n }^{( 2)\ ,\mu}\varep silo n ^{(2 )\,\ n u} 
\; \ big|^ \text {t r un c ated} \notag \\
&=\ fr ac{1}{ N''}\ Big\{\widehat {\Phi}_2\x i ^ { \mu}\xi^ {\nu } 
+ \ widehat{\Psi}_ 2\zet a^{\mu}\ze t a^{\nu}+ \wide hat{\The ta}_2(\xi ^ { \mu}\zet a^{ \nu }
+ \ze t a ^{ \mu}\xi^{\nu} ) \ Big\ }\ ,\,\Big |_{ k_0=\om ega _2} \,. \en d{ aligned}$ $

Final ly  i tho lds  that $$k_{\mu }\ lef t( \ov erlin e {\vare psilo n}^{ (1 )\ , \mu }\varep s il o n ^{(1 )\ ,\ nu}\ rig ht )(k)= 0\,, \ qua d \lim_ {\mathcal {E} \ maps to  0 } k_{\m u}\left(\over li ne{\vareps il on} ^{(2)\ , \ mu}\
mathcal{E}^4k_{\bot}^2}{2\omega_2^2\mathcal{N}}|\mathbf{k}|^2\Big[&+(4k_{\parallel}^2+k_{\bot}^2)\omega_2^4+4\mathcal{E}k_{\parallel}k_{\bot}^2\omega_2^3+\big(4k_{\parallel}^4+2k_{\bot}^2k_{\parallel}^2+(\mathcal{E}^2-2)k_{\bot}^4\big)\omega_2^2
\notag \\
&+4\mathcal{E}k_{\parallel}k_{\bot}^2|\mathbf{k}|^2\omega_2+k_{\bot}^2|\mathbf{k}|^2(|\mathbf{k}|^2+\mathcal{E}^2k_{\bot}^2)\Big]\,.\end{aligned}$$_where $$\mathcal{N}=|\boldsymbol{\varepsilon}^{(2)}|^2-(\varepsilon^0)^2\,,$$

and_$\omega_2=\omega_2(k_{\bot},k_{\|})$ is given by._Again, if_the_tensor is_contracted_with a gauge-invariant_expression, it can_be replaced by $\Pi^{\mu\nu}|_{\lambda=2}$:

$$\overline{\varepsilon}^{(2)\,\mu}\varepsilon^{(2)\,\nu}\mapsto_\Pi^{\mu\nu}|_{\lambda=2}\,,$$

$$\begin{aligned}
\label{eq:polarization-sum-parity-violating-2-truncated}
\Pi^{\mu\nu}|_{\lambda=2}&\equiv \overline{\varepsilon}^{(2)\,\mu}\varepsilon^{(2)\,\nu}
\;\big|^\text{truncated} \notag_\\
&=\frac{1}{N''}\Big\{\widehat{\Phi}_2\xi^{\mu}\xi^{\nu}
+\widehat{\Psi}_2\zeta^{\mu}\zeta^{\nu}+\widehat{\Theta}_2(\xi^{\mu}\zeta^{\nu}
+\zeta^{\mu}\xi^{\nu})\Big\}\,\,\Big|_{k_0=\omega_2}\,.\end{aligned}$$

Finally_it holds that $$k_{\mu}\left(\overline{\varepsilon}^{(1)\,\mu}\varepsilon^{(1)\,\nu}\right)(k)=0\,,\quad \lim_{\mathcal{E}\mapsto 0} k_{\mu}\left(\overline{\varepsilon}^{(2)\,\mu}\