\pi)^3}\left[\ln \Big({2 \pi [\lambda_1(\bm k, u_0)\lambda_2(\bm k, u_0)]^{1/2}\over \nu}\Big)
-\ln \Gamma\Big(1 + {\lambda_1(\bm k, u_0)\over \nu}\Big)-\ln \Gamma\Big(1 + {\lambda_2(\bm k, u_0)\over \nu}\Big)
\right],
\label{FreeEnergy_DissipativeT}\end{aligned}$$

where $\nu = 2 \pi T/\hbar$ and $\{\lambda_i(\bm k, u_0)\}$ are the roots of the equation $\lambda ^2(\bm k, u_0) - \gamma \lambda(\bm k, u_0) + \omega_c^2(\bm k, u_0) =0$, satisfying the relations

$$\begin{gathered}
\lambda_1 (\bm k, u_0)+ \lambda_2 (\bm k, u_0)= \gamma, \\
\lambda_1 (\bm k, u_0)\lambda_2(\bm k, u_0) = \omega_c ^2(\bm k, u_0).
\label{}\end{gathered}$$

It is worth mentioning that the first term $\widetilde F_0$ in Eq. now includes the contribution due to the reservoir. In principle, this contribution could exhibit a nontrivial behavior close to the transition point as a result of the coupling between the active atoms (which clearly “feel” the transition) and the degrees of freedom in the reservoir (which also “feel” the transition because of this coupling). Nevertheless, if these degrees of freedom forming the reservoir are low-frequency acoustic phonons, which would be quite natural, it can be shown that their contribution i) is not substantially modified because of damping [@Cano04a] and ii) is not the most important one close to the (low-$T$) phase-transition point as we have seen in Sec. \[S:Phonon-like dynamics\] [@Cano04b].

The above formulas allow us to compute the relevant magnitudes close to the phase transition by following the same procedure as before (see Ref. [@Cano04b]). The coefficient at the quadratic term in $u_0$ in the free energy, for instance,
\pi)^3}\left[\ln \Big({2 \pi [ \lambda_1(\bm k, u_0)\lambda_2(\bm k, u_0)]^{1/2}\over \nu}\Big) 
 -\ln \Gamma\Big(1 + { \lambda_1(\bm k, u_0)\over \nu}\Big)-\ln \Gamma\Big(1 + { \lambda_2(\bm k, u_0)\over \nu}\Big) 
 \right ], 
 \label{FreeEnergy_DissipativeT}\end{aligned}$$ 

 where $ \nu = 2 \pi T/\hbar$ and $ \{\lambda_i(\bm k, u_0)\}$ are the roots of the equality $ \lambda ^2(\bm k, u_0) - \gamma \lambda(\bm k, u_0) + \omega_c^2(\bm k, u_0) = 0 $, meet the relations 

 $ $ \begin{gathered } 
 \lambda_1 (\bm k, u_0)+ \lambda_2 (\bm k, u_0)= \gamma, \\ 
 \lambda_1 (\bm k, u_0)\lambda_2(\bm k, u_0) = \omega_c ^2(\bm k, u_0). 
 \label{}\end{gathered}$$ 

 It is worth mention that the beginning term $ \widetilde F_0 $ in Eq. now admit the contribution due to the reservoir. In rationale, this contribution could exhibit a nontrivial behavior close to the transition point as a resultant role of the coupling between the active atoms (which intelligibly “ feel ” the transition) and the degrees of freedom in the reservoir (which also “ find ” the transition because of this coupling). Nevertheless, if these degree of freedom forming the reservoir are low - frequency acoustic phonons, which would be quite natural, it can be show that their contribution i) is not substantially modified because of damping [ @Cano04a ] and ii) is not the most authoritative one close to the (low-$T$) phase - transition point as we have seen in Sec. \[S: Phonon - like dynamics\ ] [ @Cano04b ]. 

 The above formulas allow us to compute the relevant magnitudes close to the phase transition by following the same procedure as before (see Ref. [ @Cano04b ]). The coefficient at the quadratic term in $ u_0 $ in the free department of energy, for case,
\pi)^3}\lfft[\ln \Big({2 \pi [\lambda_1(\bm k, m_0)\lambda_2(\bm k, u_0)]^{1/2}\ovet \bu}\Big)
-\li \Gamma\Gig(1 + {\lamcda_1(\bm k, u_0)\over \nu}\Big)-\ln \Gamma\Bmg(1 + {\oambdq_2(\bm k, u_0)\over \nu}\Big)
\right],
\uabel{FreeVnergy_DiswipauiveT}\end{aligned}$$

whxde $\nu = 2 \pi T/\hgwr$ aud $\{\lambda_i(\bm k, u_0)\}$ are the rmots of the eqgagiln $\lambda ^2(\bm k, u_0) - \gamma \lambda(\bm k, t_0) + \omegs_c^2(\hm k, u_0) =0$, satisfiing uhe relzniins

$$\begin{gathered}
\lambda_1 (\bm k, u_0)+ \lambda_2 (\bm k, u_0)= \gamma, \\
\lambda_1 (\bm k, u_0)\lambda_2(\bm k, u_0) = \omfga_c ^2(\bm k, u_0).
\label{}\enf{gathered}$$

It is rirth mentionkng that the first terj $\widetilde F_0$ in Eq. now includer the contributuob dkg to the resxrvoir. In principlc, this wontribition could exmibit a bontrivial behavior cnose to the transijion point aa a result of the ciuplitg batwedb tfe zcvivs atomd (wiich clearlg “feel” the rransition) and the cedgres of freedkm in ehq reservoir (which also “feel” the transitpon gecause of this couplint). Nevertheless, if thede degreef of freedom forming the reservoir are low-frequenwy ackjstng oyojons, which would be quite natural, it can be srkwm nhat their contrinution i) is not sunshamjially modifiea becabae of damping [@Cano04a] wnd ii) ys nor the mosu impprtant one close to the (low-$R$) phase-transptiob point as we have seen in See. \[S:Phomon-lile dynamics\] [@Cano04b].

The abuve rormulas alpow us to zompute the relexann macnitudes close to the phasq transitmon bv followkng jhe samq procedurf as nafore (see Ref. [@Cano04h]). The cmefficient at the quadratic term in $u_0$ in vie free energi, fmr pnstance,
\pi)^3}\left[\ln \Big({2 \pi [\lambda_1(\bm k, u_0)\lambda_2(\bm k, -\ln + {\lambda_1(\bm u_0)\over \nu}\Big)-\ln \Gamma\Big(1 \right], where $\nu = \pi T/\hbar$ and k, u_0)\}$ are the roots of equation $\lambda ^2(\bm k, u_0) - \gamma \lambda(\bm k, u_0) + \omega_c^2(\bm k, =0$, satisfying the relations $$\begin{gathered} \lambda_1 (\bm k, u_0)+ \lambda_2 (\bm k, u_0)= \\ (\bm u_0)\lambda_2(\bm u_0) = \omega_c ^2(\bm k, u_0). \label{}\end{gathered}$$ It is worth mentioning that the first term $\widetilde in Eq. now includes the contribution due to reservoir. In principle, this could exhibit a nontrivial behavior to transition point a of coupling between the atoms (which clearly “feel” the transition) and the degrees of freedom in the reservoir (which also “feel” transition because coupling). Nevertheless, these of forming the reservoir acoustic phonons, which would be quite be shown that their contribution i) is not modified because damping [@Cano04a] and ii) is not most important one close to the (low-$T$) phase-transition as we have seen in Sec. \[S:Phonon-like dynamics\] [@Cano04b]. The above formulas allow us to relevant magnitudes close to phase transition by the procedure before Ref. [@Cano04b]). coefficient at the quadratic term in $u_0$ in the free energy, instance,
\pi)^3}\left[\ln \Big({2 \pi [\lambda_1(\bm k, u_0)\laMbda_2(\bm k, u_0)]^{1/2}\ovEr \nu}\BIg)
-\lN \GaMmA\Big(1 + {\LambDa_1(\bm k, u_0)\over \nu}\BiG)-\Ln \GaMma\Big(1 + {\lambda_2(\bm k, u_0)\over \nu}\big)
\riGhT],
\LabeL{frEeEneRgy_DissIPaTIVeT}\EnD{aLigNeD}$$

WhEre $\nu = 2 \Pi T/\Hbar$ and $\{\Lambda_i(\bm k, U_0)\}$ arE tHe roots of the EQuAtion $\lambdA ^2(\bm K, u_0) - \gamma \lambdA(\bm K, u_0) + \omegA_c^2(\Bm k, U_0) =0$, SatisFyiNg the RelatiONs

$$\begiN{gathered}
\LaMBda_1 (\bm k, U_0)+ \Lambda_2 (\bM K, U_0)= \gAmma, \\
\Lambda_1 (\bm k, u_0)\lambda_2(\bM K, u_0) = \OMega_c ^2(\bm k, u_0).
\label{}\End{gatHeREd}$$

iT Is wOrtH mentioninG tHat thE First teRM $\wIDETilDE F_0$ in Eq. now inclUdes the contRIbuTion duE tO thE ReservOir. In PrINciPle, this contRibuTion could ExhibiT A nontriVIal behaVior clOse To tHe trANsItIon PoINt aS A rEsuLT of The couplInG bEtweeN the ACTIVe atOms (WhicH cleaRly “feel” the traNsiTion) ANd tHe degRees oF freEdOm in tHe reseRvoir (WhIch also “feel” the tRansItion becaUse Of ThiS cOupliNG). NeverTheLesS, if thesE degreeS Of fReEDOM fOrming the reservoir ArE LOw-FrequencY acousTIc PhONons, whicH wOulD be qUITe natUral, IT cAn be showN that tHEiR cOntribuTiOn i) is nOt SubStaNtialLY modIfied bEcause of DampiNG [@Cano04a] and ii) is nOT the most imporTAnT ONe CLose To tHe (low-$T$) phase-TranSItioN poiNT aS we HAve seEn in SEc. \[s:phONon-like dynamics\] [@Cano04B].

THe abovE formUlas allow us to Compute the RELEvant magNituDEs CLose to the phase TransItion by folLOwing the Same pRocedure As before (sEE ref. [@Cano04b]). the CoeFfiCieNT At The quadratic tERM in $u_0$ In The free EneRgy, for iNstAncE,
\pi)^3}\left[\ln \Big({2 \ pi [\lambd a_1(\ bmk,u_ 0)\l ambd a_2(\bm k, u_0 ) ]^{1 /2}\over \nu}\Big)
-\l n \Ga mm a \Big ( 1+ {\l ambda_1 ( \b m k,u_ 0) \ov er \n u}\Bi g)- \ln \Ga mma\Big(1+ { \l ambda_2(\bmk ,u_0)\over\nu }\Big)
\righ t], 
\labe l{ Fre e Energ y_D issip ativeT } \end{a ligned}$$ 
w here $ \ nu = 2\ p iT/\h bar$ and $\{\lamb d a_ i (\bm k, u_0)\} $ areth e  r o o tsofthe equati on  $\la m bda ^2( \ bm k ,  u_ 0 ) - \gamma \l ambda(\bm k ,  u_ 0) + \ om ega _ c^2(\b m k,u_ 0 ) = 0$, satisfy ingthe relat ions
$ $\begin { gathere d}
\la mbd a_1  (\b m  k ,u_0 )+ \la m bd a_2 (\b m k, u_0 )=  \ gamma , \\ \ l a mbda _1(\bm  k, u _0)\lambda_2( \bm  k,u _0)  = \o mega_ c ^2 (\ bm k,  u_0). 
\lab el {}\end{gathered }$$
It is wo rth  m ent io ningt hat th e f irs t term$\widet i lde  F _ 0 $  i n Eq. now includes  t h e  c ontribut ion du e  t ot he reser vo ir.  Inp r incip le,t hi s contri bution co ul d exhib it  a non tr ivi albehav i or c lose t o the tr ansit i on point as ar esult of thec ou p l in g  bet wee n the activ e at o ms ( whic h  c lea r ly “f eel”th e  t r ansition) and the d eg rees o f fre edom in the r eservoir ( w h i ch also“fee l ”t he transitionbecau se of this coupling ). Ne verthele ss, if th e s e degree s o f f ree dom f or ming the rese r v oirar e low-f req uency a cou sti c p hon on s, whichwould be  q ui te  n atu ral,i t can be  s how ntha t the i r cont ribut ioni)  i s  no t subst a nt i a llymo di fied  be ca use o f da m pin g [@Can o04a] and  ii )  isno tthe mos t important o ne  close toth e ( low-$T $ )  phase-t ransition point as we h a ve seen  in  Sec.  \[S :Phonon-l ike  dynam ics \ ] [@Ca no04b] .

Th eabo v e  form u l as  al lo w us to co m p ute  there leva nt magn itudes close to th e  ph ase transitio n b y fo l l ow ing th e  sa me pro c e dure as before(see Ref.[@ C an o04b]). Th e  co ef ficient  at the  quad r atic te rm in $u_ 0$ in the  f reee n erg y, for ins tance,
\pi)^3}\left[\ln \Big({2_\pi [\lambda_1(\bm_k, u_0)\lambda_2(\bm k, u_0)]^{1/2}\over_\nu}\Big)
-\ln \Gamma\Big(1_+_{\lambda_1(\bm k,_u_0)\over_\nu}\Big)-\ln \Gamma\Big(1 +_{\lambda_2(\bm k, u_0)\over_\nu}\Big)
\right],
\label{FreeEnergy_DissipativeT}\end{aligned}$$

where $\nu = 2_\pi T/\hbar$ and_$\{\lambda_i(\bm_k, u_0)\}$ are the roots of the equation $\lambda ^2(\bm k, u_0) - \gamma_\lambda(\bm_k, u_0)_+_\omega_c^2(\bm_k, u_0) =0$, satisfying the_relations

$$\begin{gathered}
\lambda_1 (\bm k, u_0)+ \lambda_2_(\bm k,_u_0)= \gamma, \\
\lambda_1 (\bm k, u_0)\lambda_2(\bm k, u_0)_=_\omega_c ^2(\bm k,_u_0).
\label{}\end{gathered}$$

It is worth mentioning that the first term $\widetilde_F_0$ in Eq. now includes the_contribution due to_the_reservoir._In principle, this contribution_could exhibit a nontrivial behavior close_to the transition point as a_result of the coupling between the active_atoms (which clearly “feel” the transition)_and the degrees of freedom_in the_reservoir (which also “feel” the_transition because of_this coupling)._Nevertheless, if these_degrees of freedom forming the reservoir_are low-frequency acoustic_phonons, which would be quite natural,_it_can be shown_that_their_contribution i)_is not substantially_modified_because of_damping_[@Cano04a] and ii) is not the_most_important one close to the (low-$T$) phase-transition_point as we have_seen_in Sec. \[S:Phonon-like dynamics\]_[@Cano04b].

The above formulas allow us_to compute the relevant magnitudes close_to the_phase transition_by following the same procedure as before (see Ref. [@Cano04b]). The_coefficient at the quadratic term in_$u_0$ in the free_energy, for_instance,