 and/or $Z_{GC}$ show a MF significantly flatter than the cluster in the outer Galactic halo or farther from the Galactic plane. Indeed, M55 is near to the Galactic bulge, $R_{GC}=4.7$ kpc ($R_\odot=8.0$ kpc), and to the Galactic disk $Z_{GC}=-2.0$ kpc. Figure \[m55xrz\] shows that taking into account observing errors, M55 fairly fits into the relation given by [@Manu97], which is a refined version of the one found by [@DPC93]. A different conclusion has been reached by [@Mand96] using their uncorrected (for mass segregation) value for the MF of M55. As noted by the referee, M55 lies further from the average relation defined by the other clusters: of those with a similar abscissa ($0.0\pm0.2$), M55 is the one with the lowest value of $x$. It is not possible to identify the main source of this apparent enhanced mass-loss of M55 compared to the other clusters; a possible cause can be a orbit of the cluster that deeply penetrate into the bulge of the Galaxy. This cannot be confirmed until is performed a reliable measure of the proper motion of M55.

Radial density profile from star counts.\[M55rprof\]
====================================================

The CMD allows a unique way to obtain a reliable measure of the radial density profiles of GCs. In fact, the CMD allows us to sort out the stars belonging to the cluster, limiting the problems generated by the presence of the field stars. This also permits to extract radial profiles for distinct stellar masses.

We have first created a profile as in [@King68], in order to compare our results with the existing data in the literature. The comparison has been done with the radial density profile of M55 published by [@Pryor91] which includes the visual star counts of King et al.. We could not compare our data with [@Irwin84] because they have not published their observations in tabular form.

\[profconf\]

Density profile for stars above the TO
--------------------------------------

Figure \[profile\] shows the radial density profile for the TO plus SGB stars extracted from the CMD of M55 (from 1 magnitude below the TO to the brightest limit of our photometry). We have selected the stars within $2.5\sigma$ from the fiducial
and/or $ Z_{GC}$ show a MF significantly flatter than the cluster in the out Galactic aura or farther from the Galactic plane. Indeed, M55 is near to the Galactic bulge, $ R_{GC}=4.7 $   kpc ($ R_\odot=8.0 $   kpc), and to the Galactic magnetic disk $ Z_{GC}=-2.0 $   kpc. Figure   \[m55xrz\ ] shows that take into account observing mistake, M55 fairly fits into the relation back given by [ @Manu97 ], which is a refined interpretation of the one found by [ @DPC93 ]. A different conclusion has been reached by [ @Mand96 ] using their uncorrected (for aggregate segregation) value for the MF of M55. As noted by the referee, M55 lies far from the average relation specify by the other bunch: of those with a similar abscissa ($ 0.0\pm0.2 $), M55 is the one with the low value of $ x$. It is not possible to identify the main informant of this apparent enhanced mass - loss of M55 compared to the other bunch; a potential campaign can be a orbit of the cluster that deeply penetrate into the bulge of the Galaxy. This cannot be confirmed until is performed a dependable bill of the proper motion of M55. 

 Radial density visibility from star counts.\[M55rprof\ ] 
 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 

 The CMD allow a unique way to obtain a dependable measure of the radial density profiles of GCs. In fact, the CMD admit us to sort out the stars belonging to the cluster, limiting the problems render by the presence of the field stars. This also allow to extract radial profile for distinct stellar masses. 

 We have first created a visibility as in [ @King68 ], in order to compare our results with the existing data in the literature. The comparison has been done with the radial density profile of M55 published by [ @Pryor91 ] which includes the ocular star count of King et al.. We could not compare our data with [ @Irwin84 ] because they have not published their observation in tabular form. 

 \[profconf\ ] 

 Density visibility for stars above the TO 
 -------------------------------------- 

 Figure   \[profile\ ] shows the radial density visibility for the TO plus SGB stars extracted from the CMD of M55 (from 1 magnitude below the TO to the bright limit of our photometry). We have selected the stars within $ 2.5\sigma$ from the fiducial
 anf/or $Z_{GC}$ show a MF signiflcantly flatter jhqn the clustsr in thd outer Galactic halo or farvher from the Galactic plane. Inaeed, M55 is near to the Talactic bnmge, $R_{GC}=4.7$ kpc ($R_\oslt=8.0$ kpe), end to the Galagtic disk $Z_{CC}=-2.0$ kpc. Figure \[m55xsz\] skows that taking into account observyng errprd, M55 fairly fitf inuo ehe dvlction given by [@Manu97], which is a defined version of tne one found by [@DPC93]. A difffrenh conclusion has bfen reached by [@Iqnd96] using thdir uncorrtcced (for masa segregation) value for the MF uf M55. Cs noted by tye ggferee, M55 liew furnher from the average relatipn defined by bhe ovher clusters: of those wivh a similar abscissw ($0.0\pm0.2$), M55 is tke one with the lowesr calue of $f$. It us vot ppsaible ho mdentify ths main sourxe of this apparent egyanced mass-loas of I55 sompared to the other clusters; a possibne dause can be a orbit of the cluster that deekly penetrwte into the bulge of the Galaxy. This cannot be cmnfirjdd bkbil kw oerformed a reliable measure of the proper moejom pf M55.

Radial denfity profilr vrpi star counts.\[O55rprof\]
====================================================

Cge CMD allows a uniqke way jo obtqin a relyablr measure of the radial denwity profilef of GCs. In fact, thz CMD allows us jo sory out the stars belongiug to fhe cluster, limiting ghe problems gendraned ty the presence of the fiejd stars. Vhis clso peroits to exeract radiwl profiles for distinct stelpas masses.

We have first created a profile as in [@King68], in otdes tm comparz our vesults with thq existing datc in the litefature. The comparmson has beeg done with tvg radial densmty profije od M55 publishda by [@Pryor91] whivh includvs the visual star countx ow King et al.. We euood not compare ouf dwtw xith [@Yswin84] because theh hxfe nog published gheit observations in tatulad form.

\[profconf\]

Densotn profile for staws above the YO
--------------------------------------

Figure \[profile\] shlws tie radmal demsijy profile for the TO plus SGB atars extgacbed from the SMD if M55 (from 1 mcgnitude below the TO to the brightest lmmit of our photometry). Qe have selected thg suars within $2.5\smgma$ fwom the fhducial
and/or $Z_{GC}$ show a MF significantly flatter cluster the outer halo or farther M55 near to the bulge, $R_{GC}=4.7$ kpc kpc), and to the Galactic disk kpc. Figure \[m55xrz\] shows that taking into account observing errors, M55 fairly fits the relation given by [@Manu97], which is a refined version of the one by A conclusion been reached by [@Mand96] using their uncorrected (for mass segregation) value for the MF of M55. noted by the referee, M55 lies further from average relation defined by other clusters: of those with similar ($0.0\pm0.2$), M55 the with lowest value of It is not possible to identify the main source of this apparent enhanced mass-loss of M55 compared the other possible cause be orbit the cluster that into the bulge of the Galaxy. confirmed until is performed a reliable measure of proper motion M55. Radial density profile from star ==================================================== The CMD allows a unique way to a reliable measure of the radial density profiles of GCs. In fact, the CMD allows sort out the stars to the cluster, the generated the of the stars. This also permits to extract radial profiles for distinct stellar We have first created a profile as in [@King68], in compare results with the data in the literature. comparison been done with the profile M55 which the star counts of King al.. We could not compare data with [@Irwin84] because observations in tabular form. \[profconf\] Density profile for above the TO -------------------------------------- Figure \[profile\] shows radial density profile for the TO plus SGB stars extracted from the of M55 magnitude below the TO to the brightest limit our photometry). We have the stars within $2.5\sigma$ from the fiducial
 and/or $Z_{GC}$ show a MF significanTly flatter Than tHe cLusTeR in tHe ouTer Galactic halO Or faRther from the Galactic plAne. InDeED, M55 is NEaR to thE GalactIC bULGe, $R_{gC}=4.7$ KpC ($R_\oDoT=8.0$ KpC), and tO thE GalactIc disk $Z_{GC}=-2.0$ kPc. FIgUre \[m55xrz\] shows THaT taking intO acCount observiNg eRrors, M55 FaIrlY Fits iNto The reLation GIven by [@manu97], which Is A RefineD Version OF ThE one Found by [@DPC93]. A differENt COnclusion has beEn reacHeD By [@mANd96] uSinG their uncoRrEcted (FOr mass sEGrEGATioN) Value for the MF Of M55. As noted bY The RefereE, M55 LieS FurtheR from ThE AveRage relatioN defIned by the Other cLUsters: oF Those wiTh a simIlaR abScisSA ($0.0\pM0.2$), M55 Is tHe ONe wITh The LOweSt value oF $x$. it Is not PossIBLE To idEntIfy tHe maiN source of this AppArenT EnhAnced Mass-lOss oF M55 CompaRed to tHe othEr Clusters; a possibLe caUse can be a OrbIt Of tHe ClustER that dEepLy pEnetratE into thE BulGe OF THe galaxy. This cannot be CoNFIrMed until Is perfORmEd A Reliable MeAsuRe of THE propEr moTIoN of M55.

RadiAl densITy PrOfile frOm Star coUnTs.\[M55RprOf\]
====================================================

The cmD alLows a uNique way To obtAIn a reliable meaSUre of the radiaL DeNSItY ProfIleS of GCs. In facT, the cmD alLows US tO soRT out tHe staRs BElONging to the cluster, liMiTing thE probLems generated By the preseNCE Of the fieLd stARs. tHis also permits To extRact radial PRofiles fOr disTinct steLlar masseS.

wE have firSt cReaTed A prOFIlE as in [@King68], in orDER to cOmPare our ResUlts witH thE exIstIng DaTa in the liTerature. thE cOmPaRisOn has BEen done wItH thE rAdiAl denSIty proFile oF M55 puBlIsHEd bY [@Pryor91] wHIcH INcluDeS tHe viSuaL sTar coUnts OF KiNg et al.. WE could not ComPAre oUr DaTa with [@IRwin84] because thEy Have not pubLiSheD their OBServatioNs in tabular form.

\[profconf\]

dEnsity pRofIle foR staRs above thE TO
--------------------------------------

figure \[ProFIle\] shoWs the rAdial DeNsiTY ProfiLE FoR thE To plus SGB stARS exTractEd From The CMD oF M55 (from 1 magnitude belOW thE TO to the brighTesT limIT Of Our PHoTOmeTrY). we hAVE selected the staRs within $2.5\siGmA$ FrOm the fiducIAl
 and/or $Z_{GC}$ show a MF  significa ntlyfla tte rthan  the  cluster in th e  out er Galactic halo or fa rther  f r om t h eGalac tic pla n e. I nde ed ,M55  i s  n ear t o t he Gala ctic bulge , $ R_ {GC}=4.7$ kp c  ( $R_\odot=8 .0$  kpc), and t o t he Gal ac tic disk$Z_ {GC}= -2.0$k pc. Fi gure \[m5 5x r z\] sh o ws that t ak inginto account obse r vi n g errors, M55fairly  f i ts i nto  th e relation  g ivenb y [@Man u 97 ] , whi c h is a refine d version o f  th e onefo und by [@D PC93] .A  di fferent con clus ion has b een re a ched by [@Mand9 6] usi ngthe ir u n co rr ect ed (fo r  m ass seg regation )va lue f or t h e M F of  M5 5. A s not ed by the ref ere e, M 5 5 l ies f urthe r fr om  theaverag e rel at ion defined bytheother clu ste rs : o fthose with a  si mil ar absc issa ($ 0 .0\ pm 0 . 2 $) , M55 is the one w it h th e lowest  value of  $ x $. It is  n otposs i b le to  ide n ti fy the m ain so u rc eof this  a pparen tenh anc ed ma s s-lo ss ofM55 comp aredt o the other cl u sters; a poss i bl e ca u se c anbe a orbitof t h e cl uste r  t hat deepl y pen et r at e  into the bulge ofth e Gala xy. T his cannot be  confirmed u n til is p erfo r me d  a reliable me asure  of the pr o per moti on of  M55.

R adial den s i ty profi lefro m s tar c ou nts.\[M55rpro f \ ]
== == ======= === ======= === === === === == ========= ======== 
Th eCM D a llows a unique  w ayto  ob taina  relia ble m easu re  o f  th e radia l  d e n sity  p ro file s o fGCs.In f a ct,  the CM D allowsust o so rt  o ut thestars belongi ng  to the cl us ter , limi t i ng the p roblems generated by th e  presen ceof th e fi eld stars . T his al sop ermits  to ex tract  r adi a l  prof i l es  fo rdistinct s t e lla r mas se s.
We have  first created a p r ofi le as in [@Ki ng6 8],i n  o rde r  t o  co mp a reo u r results withthe existi ng da ta in thel ite ra ture. T he comp ariso n  has be en done w ith the r ad iald e nsi ty profile  of M55published by [@ P ry or91]  wh ich in cl ude s the  visua l  st ar co unts o fKing e t al. .We could  not compare our data w ith [@ Irwin 84]  becausethe y  ha ve not pu blis hed theirobs erv ation s i n  tabu larf or m.\[pro fcon f \]

Densi t ypro f i le  for starsa b o vethe T O
- - ------ ---- ----------------- - --------

Figu re \ [ p rof ile \ ] sh ow s the radial d ens it y profilefo r the TO pl us SGB s ta r s ext racted  fromthe CMD o fM 55 (fr om 1  ma gnitude b elo wt he TO t oth e  brigh test  l imit o f ourp hoto m e try). We have se lecte d the s t ars  with in  $2.5\s i gma$  from thefiducial
 and/or_$Z_{GC}$ show_a MF significantly flatter_than the_cluster_in the_outer_Galactic halo or_farther from the_Galactic plane. Indeed, M55_is near to_the_Galactic bulge, $R_{GC}=4.7$ kpc ($R_\odot=8.0$ kpc), and to the Galactic disk $Z_{GC}=-2.0$ kpc. Figure \[m55xrz\] shows that taking_into_account observing_errors,_M55_fairly fits into the relation_given by [@Manu97], which is_a refined_version of the one found by [@DPC93]. A_different_conclusion has been_reached by [@Mand96] using their uncorrected (for mass segregation)_value for the MF of M55._As noted by_the_referee,_M55 lies further from_the average relation defined by the_other clusters: of those with a_similar abscissa ($0.0\pm0.2$), M55 is the one_with the lowest value of $x$._It is not possible to_identify the_main source of this apparent_enhanced mass-loss of_M55 compared_to the other_clusters; a possible cause can be_a orbit of_the cluster that deeply penetrate into_the_bulge of the_Galaxy._This_cannot be_confirmed until is_performed_a reliable_measure_of the proper motion of M55.

Radial_density_profile from star counts.\[M55rprof\]
====================================================

The CMD allows a_unique way to obtain_a_reliable measure of the_radial density profiles of GCs._In fact, the CMD allows us_to sort_out the_stars belonging to the cluster, limiting the problems generated by the_presence of the field stars. This_also permits to extract_radial profiles_for_distinct stellar masses.

We_have_first created_a profile as in [@King68], in order_to compare_our results with the existing data_in the literature. The_comparison_has been done with the radial_density profile of M55 published by_[@Pryor91] which includes the visual_star_counts_of King et al.. We_could not compare our data with_[@Irwin84] because they_have not published their observations in tabular_form.

\[profconf\]

Density_profile for stars above the TO
--------------------------------------

Figure \[profile\]_shows_the radial density profile for the_TO_plus_SGB stars extracted from the_CMD of M55 (from 1 magnitude_below the TO to the brightest limit of our_photometry). We have_selected the stars within $2.5\sigma$_from_the_fiducial