 the mice of the group, thus showing characteristic kinetic properties of the FDG inside the CT26 tumor tissue, independently of the specific murine experiment.

Estimates of the rate constants available in the literature refer to tissues, and have been obtained by application of compartmental models that are comparable with SCM and are connected to data by equations of the simplified form (\[eq:C\_T\_Sok\_vero\]), instead of equation (\[eq:C\_T\_tiss\_pesato\]), which has been applied in the present reduction procedure. The values obtained for $k_1^*$, $k_2^*$, $k_3^*$ and $k_4^*$ are slightly higher than the estimates found, e.g., in [@Sokoloff], referring to cerebral metabolism of albino rats, and in [@Reivich] and [@Ishibashi], for cerebral consumption in healthy human brains. On the contrary, the present values are comparable with those estimated in [@Roe], for mice with prostate carcinoma xenograft, and in [@Rusten], for soft tissue carcinomas in human patients; in both cases the rate constant corresponding to $k_4^*$ was set equal to zero.

Substitution of the values of the rate constants into the systems of ODEs (\[eq:ode\_C\]) and (\[eq:dot\_C\_S\]) allows a more complete analysis of tracer kinetics.  \[fig:comp\_tissue\] shows the reconstructed compartment concentrations for the mouse m1 according to BCM, panel (a), and SCM, panel (b). The curves are representative of the kinetics of the other mice of the group analyzed. As to comparison of results obtained for concentrations, it is found that $C_f$ and $C_f^*$ are almost equal for the two models and reach the stationary value in a rather short time. Also, for the BCM, stationarity is achieved by $C_p$ in a few minutes, and its stationary value is smaller than the value of $C_f$. According to BCM, tracer accumulates in ER, whose compartment concentration $C_r$ grows with time. Similarly, the analysis performed with the use of SCM shows that accumulation of tracer takes place in the cytosolic phosphorylated pool $C_p^*$. Notice that, at each time $t$, $C_r(t)$ is almost four times $C_p^*(t)$. This observed difference follows from the fact that the ER compartment in B
the mice of the group, thus showing characteristic kinetic properties of the FDG inside the CT26 tumor tissue, independently of the specific murine experiment. 

 appraisal of the pace constants available in the literature refer to tissues, and have been prevail by lotion of compartmental models that are comparable with SCM and are connected to data by equation of the simplified form (\[eq: C\_T\_Sok\_vero\ ]), alternatively of equation (\[eq: C\_T\_tiss\_pesato\ ]), which has been applied in the present decrease procedure. The values obtained for $ k_1^*$, $ k_2^*$, $ k_3^*$ and $ k_4^*$ are slightly high than the estimates found, e.g., in [ @Sokoloff ], referring to cerebral metabolism of albino rat, and in [ @Reivich ] and [ @Ishibashi ], for cerebral consumption in healthy human brains. On the reverse, the present values are comparable with those estimated in [ @Roe ], for mouse with prostate carcinoma xenograft, and in [ @Rusten ], for delicate tissue carcinomas in human patients; in both cases the rate constant corresponding to $ k_4^*$ was dress equal to zero. 

 Substitution of the values of the rate constants into the systems of ODEs (\[eq: ode\_C\ ]) and (\[eq: dot\_C\_S\ ]) allows a more complete analysis of tracer kinetics.   \[fig: comp\_tissue\ ] shows the reconstructed compartment concentrations for the mouse m1 according to BCM, panel (a), and SCM, panel (bacillus). The curves are representative of the kinetics of the early mouse of the group analyze. As to comparison of results obtained for assiduity, it is found that $ C_f$ and $ C_f^*$ are almost equal for the two models and strive the stationary value in a rather short time. Also, for the BCM, stationarity is achieved by $ C_p$ in a few minutes, and its stationary value is little than the value of $ C_f$. According to BCM, tracer accumulates in ER, whose compartment concentration $ C_r$ grows with time. Similarly, the analysis perform with the use of SCM shows that accumulation of tracer takes place in the cytosolic phosphorylated pond $ C_p^*$. Notice that, at each time $ t$, $ C_r(t)$ is almost four times $ C_p^*(t)$. This ascertained difference postdate from the fact that the ER compartment in B
 thf mice of the group, thus showing characjeeistic kinetjc propefties of the FDG inside the RT26 tymor upssue, independently ow the spebific murune txperiment.

Estimatxa of thc rats convvants available in the liderature refer tu cissues, and have been obtained by ap[licatipn of compartmenjal mpqels nhct are comparable with SCM and zre coniected to data ny equations of the simplivied form (\[eq:C\_T\_Sok\_vero\]), lnstead of gsuaeuon (\[eq:C\_T\_tiss\_oesato\]), whibk has been zpplied in the present reductiov proeedure. The caoued obtained fir $k_1^*$, $h_2^*$, $k_3^*$ and $k_4^*$ arc slighdly higner than the extikatws found, e.g., in [@Sokolohf], referring to cerefral metatomism of albino rars, and hn [@Raivizy] avd [@Jsiibzshi], flr rerebral cohsumption ib healthy human braonf. On the contrzry, thq [resent values are comparable with thost estjmated in [@Roe], for mice qith prostate carcinola xenogrwft, and in [@Rusten], for soft tissue carcinomas in hgman 'agieubf; un both cases the rate constant corresponding tj $k_4^*$ wss set equal tj zero.

Substotktojn of the valoes of cge rate constants inho the fystens of ODEf (\[eq:pde\_C\]) and (\[eq:dot\_C\_S\]) allows a mire complete qnalysis of tracer kinetics.  \[fng:comp\_jissue\] shows the reconstructeb compzrtment confentratiohr for the mouse o1 abcorging to BCM, panel (a), and SCI, panel (b). The curves are reprefentative lf thc kinetics of the ohher liwe of the hroup analyzed. As to comparison of results objaited for coneentrabions, it is fougd that $C_f$ and $C_f^*$ are almort equal fkr the vwo models agd reach the vjationary valne in a rwthee shirt timd. Also, for the NCM, stationarity is achieved by $C_p$ in a wsw minutes, and nus wtationary valur ir siaplxr thwt the value mf $C_w$. Azvordivg to BCM, tvacdr avcumulates in ER, whove ckmpartment concenttabion $C_r$ gtows with time. Similarky, the analysis pegformxd witi the ise of SCM shows that accumulatioh of tracfr bakes place ig thc cyjosolic phoxphorylated pool $C_p^*$. Notice that, at each time $t$, $C_r(t)$ is almist four times $C_p^*(t)$. Jhix observed vifferqnce follmws from the fact thqt the ER compartkent in B
the mice of the group, thus showing properties the FDG the CT26 tumor murine Estimates of the constants available in literature refer to tissues, and have obtained by application of compartmental models that are comparable with SCM and are to data by equations of the simplified form (\[eq:C\_T\_Sok\_vero\]), instead of equation (\[eq:C\_T\_tiss\_pesato\]), has applied the reduction procedure. The values obtained for $k_1^*$, $k_2^*$, $k_3^*$ and $k_4^*$ are slightly higher than the found, e.g., in [@Sokoloff], referring to cerebral metabolism albino rats, and in and [@Ishibashi], for cerebral consumption healthy brains. On contrary, present are comparable with estimated in [@Roe], for mice with prostate carcinoma xenograft, and in [@Rusten], for soft tissue carcinomas in patients; in the rate corresponding $k_4^*$ set equal to of the values of the rate systems of ODEs (\[eq:ode\_C\]) and (\[eq:dot\_C\_S\]) allows a complete analysis tracer kinetics. \[fig:comp\_tissue\] shows the reconstructed concentrations for the mouse m1 according to BCM, (a), and SCM, panel (b). The curves are representative of the kinetics of the other the group analyzed. As comparison of results for it found $C_f$ and are almost equal for the two models and reach the stationary in a rather short time. Also, for the BCM, stationarity by in a few and its stationary value smaller the value of $C_f$. BCM, accumulates compartment $C_r$ with time. Similarly, the performed with the use of shows that accumulation of cytosolic phosphorylated pool $C_p^*$. Notice that, at each $t$, $C_r(t)$ is almost four times $C_p^*(t)$. observed difference follows from the fact that the ER compartment in B
 the mice of the group, thus showIng charactEristIc kIneTiC proPertIes of the FDG insIDe thE CT26 tumor tissue, independEntly Of THe spECiFic muRine expERiMENt.

EStImAteS oF ThE rate ConStants aVailable in The LiTerature refeR To Tissues, and HavE been obtaineD by ApplicAtIon OF compArtMentaL modelS That arE comparabLe WIth SCM ANd are coNNEcTed tO data by equations oF ThE Simplified form (\[Eq:C\_T\_SoK\_vERo\]), INSteAd oF equation (\[eQ:C\_t\_tiss\_PEsato\]), whICh HAS BeeN Applied in the pResent reducTIon ProcedUrE. ThE Values ObtaiNeD For $K_1^*$, $k_2^*$, $k_3^*$ and $k_4^*$ are sLighTly higher Than thE EstimatES found, e.G., in [@SokOloFf], rEferRInG tO ceReBRal MEtAboLIsm Of albino RaTs, And in [@reivICH] ANd [@IsHibAshi], For ceRebral consumpTioN in hEAltHy humAn braIns. ON tHe conTrary, tHe preSeNt values are compArabLe with thoSe eStImaTeD in [@RoE], For micE wiTh pRostate CarcinoMA xeNoGRAFt, And in [@Rusten], for soft TiSSUe CarcinomAs in huMAn PaTIents; in bOtH caSes tHE Rate cOnstANt CorrespoNding tO $K_4^*$ wAs Set equaL tO zero.

SUbStiTutIon of THe vaLues of The rate cOnstaNTs into the systeMS of ODEs (\[eq:ode\_C\]) ANd (\[EQ:DoT\_c\_S\]) alLowS a more complEte aNAlysIs of TRaCer KInetiCs.  \[fig:CoMP\_tISsue\] shows the reconstRuCted coMpartMent concentraTions for thE MOUse m1 accoRdinG To bcM, panel (a), and SCM, Panel (B). The curves ARe represEntatIve of the Kinetics oF THe other mIce Of tHe gRouP ANaLyzed. As to compARIson Of Results ObtAined foR coNceNtrAtiOnS, it is founD that $C_f$ aNd $c_f^*$ ArE aLmoSt equAL for the tWo ModElS anD reacH The staTionaRy vaLuE iN A raTher shoRT tIME. AlsO, fOr The BcM, sTaTionaRity IS acHieved bY $C_p$ in a few MinUTes, aNd ItS statioNary value is smAlLer than the VaLue Of $C_f$. AcCORding to BcM, tracer accumulates in ER, WHose comParTment ConcEntration $c_r$ gRows wiTh tIMe. SimiLarly, tHe anaLySis PERformED WiTh tHe Use of SCM shOWS thAt accUmUlatIon of trAcer takes place in thE CytOsolic phosphoRylAted POOl $c_p^*$. NOTiCE thAt, AT eaCH Time $t$, $C_r(t)$ is almosT four times $c_p^*(T)$. thIs observed DIffErEnce folLows froM the fACt that tHe ER compaRtment in B
 the mice of the group, th us showing  char act eri st ic k inet ic propertieso f th e FDG inside the CT26tumor  t i ssue ,  i ndepe ndently of t hesp ec ifi cm ur ine e xpe riment. 

Estimate s o fthe rate con s ta nts availa ble  in the lite rat ure re fe r t o  tiss ues , and  haveb een ob tained by  a p plicat i on of c o m pa rtme ntal models thata re comparable wit h SCMan d  a r e  co nne cted to da ta  by e q uations of t h e s i mplified form  (\[eq:C\_T \ _So k\_ver o\ ]), instea d ofeq u ati on (\[eq:C\ _T\_ tiss\_pes ato\]) ,  whichh as been  appli edinthep re se ntre d uct i on  pr o ced ure. The  v al ues o btai n e d for$k_ 1^*$ , $k_ 2^*$, $k_3^*$  an d $k _ 4^* $ are  slig htly  h igher  thanthe e st imates found, e .g.,  in [@Sok olo ff ],re ferri n g to c ere bra l metab olism o f  al bi n o ra ts, and in [@Reivi ch ] an d [@Ishi bashi] ,  f or cerebral  c ons umpt i o n inheal t hy  human b rains. On  t he cont ra ry, th epre sen t val u es a re com parablewitht hose estimated in [@Roe], fo r  m i c ew ithpro state carci noma xeno graf t ,and in [@ Ruste n] ,  f o r soft tissue carci no mas in  huma n patients; i n both cas e s the rate  con s ta n t correspondin g to$k_4^*$ wa s  set equ al to  zero.
Substitut i o n of the  va lue s o f t h e  r ate constants i ntoth e syste msof ODEs  (\ [eq :od e\_ C\ ]) and (\ [eq:dot\ _C \_ S\ ])  al lowsa  more co mp let eana lysis of tra cer k inet ic s.  \[ fig:com p \_ t i ssue \]  s hows  th erecon stru c ted  compar tment con cen t rati on sfor the  mouse m1 acc or ding to BC M,  pa nel (a ) ,  and SCM , panel (b). The curves are rep res entat iveof the ki net ics of  th e  other  miceof th egro u p  anal y z ed . A sto compari s o n o f res ul ts o btained  for concentration s , i t is found th at$C_f $ an d $ C _f ^ *$ar e  al m o st equal for th e two mode ls an d reach th e  st at ionaryvalue i n a r a ther sh ort time.  Also, fo rtheB C M,stationari ty is ac hieved by $C_p$ in  a fe w m inutes ,and  itsstatio n ary  valu e is s ma ller t han t he  value o f $C_f$. According to B CM, tr aceracc umulatesinE R,whose com part ment conce ntr ati on $C _r$ grows  wit h  t ime .  Simi larl y , the ana l ys isp e rf ormed witht h e  us e ofSCM showsthat  accumulation oft racer takes pl acei n  th e c y toso li c phosphorylat edpo o l  $C_p^*$ .Notice that , at eac ht ime $ t$, $C _r(t)$  is alm o s tf our ti mes$C_ p^*(t)$.Thi so bserved  d if f erence  fol lo ws fro m thef actt h at the ER compar tment i n B
 the_mice of_the group, thus showing_characteristic kinetic_properties_of the_FDG_inside the CT26_tumor tissue, independently_of the specific murine_experiment.

Estimates of the_rate_constants available in the literature refer to tissues, and have been obtained by application_of_compartmental models_that_are_comparable with SCM and are_connected to data by equations_of the_simplified form (\[eq:C\_T\_Sok\_vero\]), instead of equation (\[eq:C\_T\_tiss\_pesato\]), which_has_been applied in_the present reduction procedure. The values obtained for $k_1^*$,_$k_2^*$, $k_3^*$ and $k_4^*$ are slightly_higher than the_estimates_found,_e.g., in [@Sokoloff], referring_to cerebral metabolism of albino rats,_and in [@Reivich] and [@Ishibashi], for_cerebral consumption in healthy human brains. On_the contrary, the present values are_comparable with those estimated in_[@Roe], for_mice with prostate carcinoma xenograft,_and in [@Rusten],_for soft_tissue carcinomas in_human patients; in both cases the_rate constant corresponding_to $k_4^*$ was set equal to_zero.

Substitution_of the values_of_the_rate constants_into the systems_of_ODEs (\[eq:ode\_C\])_and_(\[eq:dot\_C\_S\]) allows a more complete analysis_of_tracer kinetics.  \[fig:comp\_tissue\] shows the reconstructed compartment_concentrations for the mouse_m1_according to BCM, panel_(a), and SCM, panel (b)._The curves are representative of the_kinetics of_the other_mice of the group analyzed. As to comparison of results obtained_for concentrations, it is found that_$C_f$ and $C_f^*$ are_almost equal_for_the two models_and_reach the_stationary value in a rather short time._Also, for_the BCM, stationarity is achieved by_$C_p$ in a few_minutes,_and its stationary value is smaller_than the value of $C_f$. According_to BCM, tracer accumulates in_ER,_whose_compartment concentration $C_r$ grows with_time. Similarly, the analysis performed with_the use of_SCM shows that accumulation of tracer takes_place_in the cytosolic phosphorylated pool $C_p^*$._Notice_that, at each time $t$, $C_r(t)$_is_almost_four times $C_p^*(t)$. This observed_difference follows from the fact that_the ER compartment in B