 to the existence of $P$.

Since there exist polynomial time algorithms for computing minimum $\ell$-length bounded $s$-$t$-cuts for $\ell \leq 3$ and $\ell=n-1$ [@MahjoubMc10; @FordFu56], Lemma \[lem:xcut-kkings-destr\] immediately yields polynomial time algorithms for the minimum $\ell$-length bounded $s$-cut problem for $\ell \in \{2,3,n-1\}$.

\[cor:MoV-UC-kings\] Computing the MoV of a [$\mathit{UC}$]{}winner, a $3$-king or a [$\mathit{TC}$]{}winner in the weighted setting can be done in polynomial time.

The following result is obtained by carefully adjusting the proof of @BaierEr10 showing that approximating minimum $\ell$-length bounded cuts for $\ell \geq 4$ is NP-hard. We give the entire proof in the appendix, where we also point out deviations from the original construction.

\(v) at (0,4) ;at (v)[$v$]{};

\(u) at (0,0) ;at (u)[$u$]{};

\(u) – (v);

[theorem]{}[restateKKingsReduction]{} For any constant $k\geq 4$, computing the MoV of a $k$-king in the unweighted setting is NP-hard. For any constant $\epsilon>0$, the problem is still NP-hard when we restrict to non-constant $k \geq n^{1-\epsilon}$. \[thm:destr:kkings:nphard\]

We reduce from vertex cover; see for the construction for $k=4$. Lemma \[lem:xcut-kkings-destr\] implies that determining the MoV of node $x$ with respect to $4$-kings is equivalent to computing the cost of a $4$-length bounded minimum $x$-cut. The key part of the proof is to show that, for any $c \leq |V(G)|$, there exists a vertex cover in $G$ of size $c$ iff there exists a $4$-bounded $x$-cut in $T$ of size $c + |V(G)|$. For the direction from left to right, a vertex cover $U$ can be translated to a $4$-bounded $x$-$y$-cut by including edges
to the existence of $ P$. 

 Since there exist polynomial time algorithms for computing minimal $ \ell$-length restrict $ s$-$t$-cuts for $ \ell \leq 3 $ and $ \ell = n-1 $ [ @MahjoubMc10; @FordFu56 ], Lemma \[lem: xcut - kkings - destr\ ] immediately yields polynomial time algorithm for the minimum $ \ell$-length bounce $ s$-cut problem for $ \ell \in \{2,3,n-1\}$. 

 \[cor: MoV - UC - kings\ ] Computing the MoV of a [ $ \mathit{UC}$]{}winner, a $ 3$-king or a [ $ \mathit{TC}$]{}winner in the leaden mount can be done in polynomial clock time. 

 The following result is prevail by carefully adjusting the validation of @BaierEr10 showing that approximating minimum $ \ell$-length restrict cuts for $ \ell \geq 4 $ is NP - hard. We move over the entire proof in the appendix, where we also steer out deviations from the original construction. 

 \(v) at (0,4); at (v)[$v$ ] { }; 

 \(u) at (0,0); at (u)[$u$ ] { }; 

 \(u) – (v); 

 [ theorem]{}[restateKKingsReduction ] { } For any constant $ k\geq 4 $, computing the MoV of a $ k$-king in the unweighted mise en scene is NP - hard. For any constant $ \epsilon>0 $, the problem is still NP - heavily when we restrict to non - constant $ k \geq n^{1-\epsilon}$. \[thm: destr: kkings: nphard\ ] 

 We reduce from vertex cover; see for the construction for $ k=4$. Lemma \[lem: xcut - kkings - destr\ ] incriminate that determine the MoV of node $ x$ with respect to $ 4$-kings is equivalent to computing the cost of a $ 4$-length bounded minimum $ x$-cut. The key part of the proof is to show that, for any $ coke \leq |V(G)|$, there exists a vertex cover in $ G$ of size $ c$ iff there exist a $ 4$-bounded $ x$-cut in $ T$ of size $ vitamin c + |V(G)|$. For the direction from left to right, a vertex brood $ U$ can be translated to a $ 4$-bounded $ x$-$y$-cut by including edges
 to the existence of $P$.

Since there exist polynomian time algoritfms for computing minimum $\elp$-lwngth bounded $s$-$t$-cuts for $\elu \leq 3$ anf $\ell=n-1$ [@MqhjonbMc10; @FordFu56], Lemme \[lem:xcub-hkinfd-descr\] immediately ylelds polynmmial time algmrktkms for the minimum $\ell$-length boundeq $s$-cut lrlblem for $\ell \yn \{2,3,n-1\}$.

\[bow:MoV-HB-klngs\] Computing the MoV of a [$\mathjt{UC}$]{}winier, a $3$-king or a [$\mathit{TC}$]{}winner in the weihhtef setting can be dlne in polybomiwo time.

The foulowing result is obtajned by carefully adjusting the prooy of @BaierEt10 ahlfing that a'proxiiating minimmk $\ell$-langth bpunded cuts fov $\ell \gew 4$ is NP-hard. We give vhe entire proof in jhe appendhx, where we also pounr out devhatiubs wroj vhe origijal constructjon.

\(v) at (0,4) ;at (v)[$v$]{};

\(u) at (0,0) ;at (u)[$u$]{};

\(u) – (v);

[tnejgrm]{}[restateKKihgsRedtceion]{} For any constant $k\geq 4$, computing tve JoV of a $k$-king in the ubweighted setting is JP-hard. Fow any constant $\epsilon>0$, the problem is still NP-harg whei de xcfgeift to non-constant $k \geq n^{1-\epsilon}$. \[thm:destr:kkinda:nkhagd\]

We reduce from yertex cover; see fpr tng construction for $k=4$. Lejma \[lem:xcut-kkings-dfstr\] imklies rhat detewminong the MoV of node $x$ with eespect to $4$-kpngs is equivalent to eomputing thz cost of a $4$-length bounded minimum $x$-cuf. The key pwrt of ths proof is to shod tmat, for any $c \leq |V(G)|$, there exysts a vectex eover in $G$ og size $c$ iff thege exlvts a $4$-bounded $x$-cut in $T$ ox size $c + |G(G)|$. For the direction from left vp right, a vettef cmver $U$ ccn be branslated to a $4$-bounded $x$-$y$-cut by incjudine edges
to the existence of $P$. Since there time for computing $\ell$-length bounded $s$-$t$-cuts $\ell=n-1$ @FordFu56], Lemma \[lem:xcut-kkings-destr\] yields polynomial time for the minimum $\ell$-length bounded $s$-cut for $\ell \in \{2,3,n-1\}$. \[cor:MoV-UC-kings\] Computing the MoV of a [$\mathit{UC}$]{}winner, a $3$-king a [$\mathit{TC}$]{}winner in the weighted setting can be done in polynomial time. The result obtained carefully the proof of @BaierEr10 showing that approximating minimum $\ell$-length bounded cuts for $\ell \geq 4$ is We give the entire proof in the appendix, we also point out from the original construction. \(v) (0,4) (v)[$v$]{}; \(u) (0,0) (u)[$u$]{}; – (v); [theorem]{}[restateKKingsReduction]{} any constant $k\geq 4$, computing the MoV of a $k$-king in the unweighted setting is NP-hard. For constant $\epsilon>0$, is still when restrict non-constant $k \geq We reduce from vertex cover; see for $k=4$. Lemma \[lem:xcut-kkings-destr\] implies that determining the of node with respect to $4$-kings is equivalent computing the cost of a $4$-length bounded minimum The key part of the proof is to show that, for any $c \leq |V(G)|$, a vertex cover in of size $c$ there a $x$-cut $T$ of $c + |V(G)|$. For the direction from left to right, a cover $U$ can be translated to a $4$-bounded $x$-$y$-cut by
 to the existence of $P$.

Since theRe exist polYnomiAl tIme AlGoriThms For computing miNImum $\Ell$-length bounded $s$-$t$-cuts For $\elL \lEQ 3$ and $\ELl=N-1$ [@MahjOubMc10; @FoRDFU56], lEmmA \[lEm:XcuT-kKInGs-desTr\] iMmediatEly yields pOlyNoMial time algoRItHms for the mIniMum $\ell$-length BouNded $s$-cUt ProBLem foR $\elL \in \{2,3,n-1\}$.

\[cOr:MoV-Uc-Kings\] COmputing tHe mOV of a [$\mAThit{UC}$]{}wINNeR, a $3$-kiNg or a [$\mathit{TC}$]{}winnER iN The weighted setTing caN bE DoNE In pOlyNomial time.

thE follOWing resULt IS OBtaINed by carefullY adjusting tHE prOof of @BAiErER10 ShowinG that ApPRoxImating miniMum $\eLl$-length bOunded CUts for $\eLL \geq 4$ is Np-hard. WE giVe tHe enTIrE pRooF iN The APpEndIX, whEre we alsO pOiNt out DeviATIONs frOm tHe orIginaL construction.

\(V) at (0,4) ;At (v)[$v$]{};

\(U) At (0,0) ;aT (u)[$u$]{};

\(u) – (v);

[TheorEm]{}[reStAteKKIngsReDuctiOn]{} for any constant $k\Geq 4$, cOmputing tHe MOV Of a $K$-kIng in THe unweIghTed Setting Is NP-harD. for AnY CONsTant $\epsilon>0$, the probLeM IS sTill NP-haRd when WE rEsTRict to noN-cOnsTant $K \GEq n^{1-\epSiloN}$. \[ThM:destr:kkIngs:npHArD\]

WE reduce FrOm vertEx CovEr; sEe for THe coNstrucTion for $k=4$. lemma \[LEm:xcut-kkings-deSTr\] implies that DEtERMiNIng tHe MOV of node $x$ wiTh reSPect To $4$-kiNGs Is eQUivalEnt to CoMPuTIng the cost of a $4$-length BoUnded mInimuM $x$-cut. The key paRt of the proOF IS to show tHat, fOR aNY $c \leq |V(G)|$, there exIsts a Vertex coveR In $G$ of sizE $c$ iff There exiSts a $4$-boundED $X$-cut in $T$ oF siZe $c + |v(G)|$. FOr tHE DiRection from leFT To riGhT, a verteX coVer $U$ can Be tRanSlaTed To A $4$-bounded $x$-$Y$-cut by inClUdInG eDgeS
 to the existence of $P$.
Since the re ex ist  po ly nomi al t ime algorithms forcomputing minimum $\el l$-le ng t h bo u nd ed $s $-$t$-c u ts f or$\ el l \ le q  3 $ and  $\ ell=n-1 $ [@Mahjou bMc 10 ; @FordFu56] ,  L emma \[lem :xc ut-kkings-de str \] imm ed iat e ly yi eld s pol ynomia l  timealgorithm sf or the minimum $ \e ll$- length bounded $s $ -c u t problem for$\ell\i n  \ { 2 ,3, n-1 \}$.

\[co r: MoV-U C -kings\ ]  C o m p uti n g the MoV ofa [$\mathit { UC} $]{}wi nn er, a $3$- kingor a [ $\mathit{TC }$]{ }winner i n thew eighted setting  can b e d one  inp ol yn omi al tim e .
Th e  fo llowingre su lt is  obt a i n e d by  ca refu lly a djusting thepro of o f  @B aierE r10 s howi ng  that  appro ximat in g minimum $\ell $-le ngth boun ded  c uts  f or $\ e ll \ge q 4 $ i s NP-ha rd. Weg ive  t h e en tire proof in theap p e nd ix, wher e we a l so  p o int outde via tion s fromtheo ri ginal co nstruc t io n. 

\(v)at  (0,4)  ; at(v) [$v$] { };
\(u) a t (0,0);at ( u )[$u$]{};

\(u )  – (v);

[the o re m ] {} [ rest ate KKingsReduc tion ] {} F or a n ycon s tant$k\ge q4 $, computing the MoV o fa $k$- kingin the unweig hted setti n g is NP-ha rd.F or any constant $ \epsi lon>0$, th e  problem  is s till NP- hard when w e restri cttonon -co n s ta nt $k \geq n^ { 1 -\ep si lon}$.\[t hm:dest r:k kin gs: nph ar d\]

We r educe fr om  v er te x c over; see forth e c on str uctio n  for $ k=4$.  Lem ma  \ [ lem :xcut-k k in g s -des tr \]  imp lie sthatdete r min ing the  MoV of n ode $x$wi th  respec t to $4$-king sis equival en t t o comp u t ing thecost of a $4$-length bo u nded mi nim um $x $-cu t. The ke y p art of  th e  proof  is to  show  t hat , for a n y  $ c \ le q |V(G)|$, t her e exi st s avertexcover in $G$ of si z e $ c$ iff thereexi stsa $4 $-b o un d ed$x $ -cu t in $T$ of size$c + |V(G) |$ .  F or the dir e cti on  from l eft toright ,  a vert ex cover$U$ can b etran s l ate d to a $4$ -bounded  $x$-$y$- c ut by in cludi ngedges
 to_the existence_of $P$.

Since there exist_polynomial time_algorithms_for computing_minimum_$\ell$-length bounded $s$-$t$-cuts_for $\ell \leq_3$ and $\ell=n-1$ [@MahjoubMc10;_@FordFu56], Lemma \[lem:xcut-kkings-destr\]_immediately_yields polynomial time algorithms for the minimum $\ell$-length bounded $s$-cut problem for $\ell \in_\{2,3,n-1\}$.

\[cor:MoV-UC-kings\]_Computing the_MoV_of_a [$\mathit{UC}$]{}winner, a $3$-king or_a [$\mathit{TC}$]{}winner in the weighted_setting can_be done in polynomial time.

The following result is_obtained_by carefully adjusting_the proof of @BaierEr10 showing that approximating minimum $\ell$-length_bounded cuts for $\ell \geq 4$_is NP-hard. We_give_the_entire proof in the_appendix, where we also point out_deviations from the original construction.

\(v) at_(0,4) ;at (v)[$v$]{};

\(u) at (0,0) ;at (u)[$u$]{};

\(u)_– (v);

[theorem]{}[restateKKingsReduction]{} For any constant $k\geq_4$, computing the MoV of_a $k$-king_in the unweighted setting is_NP-hard. For any_constant $\epsilon>0$,_the problem is_still NP-hard when we restrict to_non-constant $k \geq_n^{1-\epsilon}$. \[thm:destr:kkings:nphard\]

We reduce from vertex cover;_see_for the construction_for_$k=4$._Lemma \[lem:xcut-kkings-destr\]_implies that determining_the_MoV of_node_$x$ with respect to $4$-kings is_equivalent_to computing the cost of a $4$-length_bounded minimum $x$-cut. The_key_part of the proof_is to show that, for_any $c \leq |V(G)|$, there exists_a vertex_cover in_$G$ of size $c$ iff there exists a $4$-bounded $x$-cut in_$T$ of size $c + |V(G)|$._For the direction from_left to_right,_a vertex cover_$U$_can be_translated to a $4$-bounded $x$-$y$-cut by including_edges