X_\gamma = \overline{{\textrm{span}}}^{\Vert \: \Vert_2} \{  \gamma_{m,n} \mid m,n \in \mathbb{N}_0 \}\subset \ell^2(W).$$ The following Lemma \[Lem=Blackbox\] collects all computational results we need further. As all the (rather easy) arguments are basically contained in [@Radulescu Lemma 1] we merely sketch the proof; all other proofs we give in this section will then be self-contained.

\[Lem=Blackbox\] We have the following:

1.  \[Item=BB1\] For $\gamma \in {{\mathbb{C}}_q^l[W]}, l \geq 1, m \geq 1, n \geq 0$, we have $$h_1 \gamma_{m,n} = \gamma_{m+1,n} + p \gamma_{m,n} + (L-1) \gamma_{m-1, n}.$$

2.  \[Item=BB2\] For $\gamma \in {{\mathbb{C}}_q^l[W]}\ominus S_l, l \geq 2, m \geq 0, n \geq 0$, we have $$h_1 \gamma_{m,n} = \gamma_{m+1,n} + p \gamma_{m,n} + (L-1) \gamma_{m-1, n}.$$ (Note that only the case $m=0$ was not already covered by ).

3.  \[Item=BB3\] For $\beta \in {{\mathbb{C}}_q^1[W]}\ominus S_1,    n \geq 0$, we have $$h_1 \beta_{0,n} = \beta_{1,n} + p \beta_{0,n} -   \beta_{0, n-1}.$$

4.  \[Item=BB4\] \[Item=BlackboxOne\] For $\gamma \in {{\mathbb{C}}_q^l[W]}, l \geq 1$ we have, $$\begin{split}
     & q_{l+m+n+1}( h_1 h_m \gamma h_n) = q_{l+n+m+1}( h_1  q_{l+m+n}(h_m \gamma h_n)), \qquad \:m
X_\gamma = \overline{{\textrm{span}}}^{\Vert \: \Vert_2 } \ {   \gamma_{m, n } \mid m, n \in \mathbb{N}_0 \}\subset \ell^2(W).$$ The following Lemma \[Lem = Blackbox\ ] collects all computational results we need far. As all the (preferably easy) arguments are basically contained in [ @Radulescu Lemma 1 ] we merely sketch the validation; all other proofs we give in this part will then be self - contained. 

 \[Lem = Blackbox\ ] We have the pursuit: 

 1.   \[Item = BB1\ ] For $ \gamma \in { { \mathbb{C}}_q^l[W ] }, lambert \geq 1, m \geq 1, n \geq 0 $, we have $ $ h_1 \gamma_{m, n } = \gamma_{m+1,n } + phosphorus \gamma_{m, n } + (L-1) \gamma_{m-1, n}.$$ 

 2.   \[Item = BB2\ ] For $ \gamma \in { { \mathbb{C}}_q^l[W]}\ominus S_l, l \geq 2, m \geq 0, n \geq 0 $, we have $ $ h_1 \gamma_{m, n } = \gamma_{m+1,n } + p \gamma_{m, n } + (L-1) \gamma_{m-1, n}.$$ (Note that merely the case $ m=0 $ was not already covered by). 

 3.   \[Item = BB3\ ] For $ \beta \in { { \mathbb{C}}_q^1[W]}\ominus S_1,     n \geq 0 $, we have $ $ h_1 \beta_{0,n } = \beta_{1,n } + p \beta_{0,n } -    \beta_{0, n-1}.$$ 

 4.   \[Item = BB4\ ] \[Item = BlackboxOne\ ] For $ \gamma \in { { \mathbb{C}}_q^l[W ] }, liter \geq 1 $ we have, $ $ \begin{split } 
      & q_{l+m+n+1 } (h_1 h_m \gamma h_n) = q_{l+n+m+1 } (h_1   q_{l+m+n}(h_m \gamma h_n) ), \qquad \:m
X_\galma = \overline{{\textrm{span}}}^{\Vtrt \: \Vert_2} \{  \gamma_{m,n} \mid k,n \in \jathbb{N}_0 \}\rubset \ell^2(W).$$ The following Lelmq \[Lem=Vlackbox\] collects all zomputatilnal resylts qe need fucfher. As all tgc (ratkec easy) argumentx are basiwally containeg kn [@Radulescu Lemma 1] we merely sketch ehe propf; all other projfs eq gibv ln this section will then be selr-contaiied.

\[Lem=Blackbox\] Ee have the following:

1.  \[Itel=BB1\] Vor $\gamma \in {{\mathbh{C}}_q^l[W]}, l \geq 1, m \dwq 1, n \geq 0$, wd have $$h_1 \gamma_{m,n} = \gammz_{m+1,n} + p \gamma_{m,n} + (L-1) \gamma_{m-1, n}.$$

2.  \[Iteo=BB2\] Fpr $\gamma \ib {{\natjtb{C}}_q^l[W]}\ominuw S_l, j \geq 2, m \geq 0, n \geq 0$, we havr $$h_1 \gamma_{m,n} = \gsmme_{m+1,n} + p \gamma_{m,n} + (L-1) \gamma_{m-1, i}.$$ (Note that only the case $m=0$ wds not already coveeee by ).

3.  \[Itam=BB3\] Dor $\beua \mn {{\jathbb{F}}_q^1[W]}\kminus S_1,    n \geq 0$, we have $$h_1 \beta_{0,n} = \beta_{1,m} + i \beta_{0,n} -   \befa_{0, n-1}.$$

4.  \[Ytqm=BB4\] \[Item=BlackboxOne\] For $\gamma \in {{\mathbt{C}}_q^m[W]}, l \geq 1$ we have, $$\begin{wplit}
     & q_{l+m+n+1}( h_1 h_m \hamma h_n) = q_{l+n+m+1}( h_1  q_{l+m+n}(h_m \gamma h_n)), \qquad \:m
X_\gamma = \overline{{\textrm{span}}}^{\Vert \: \Vert_2} \{ \gamma_{m,n} \in \}\subset \ell^2(W).$$ following Lemma \[Lem=Blackbox\] need As all the easy) arguments are contained in [@Radulescu Lemma 1] we sketch the proof; all other proofs we give in this section will then self-contained. \[Lem=Blackbox\] We have the following: 1. \[Item=BB1\] For $\gamma \in {{\mathbb{C}}_q^l[W]}, l 1, \geq n 0$, we have $$h_1 \gamma_{m,n} = \gamma_{m+1,n} + p \gamma_{m,n} + (L-1) \gamma_{m-1, n}.$$ 2. \[Item=BB2\] $\gamma \in {{\mathbb{C}}_q^l[W]}\ominus S_l, l \geq 2, m 0, n \geq 0$, have $$h_1 \gamma_{m,n} = \gamma_{m+1,n} p + (L-1) n}.$$ that the case $m=0$ not already covered by ). 3. \[Item=BB3\] For $\beta \in {{\mathbb{C}}_q^1[W]}\ominus S_1, n \geq 0$, we have \beta_{0,n} = p \beta_{0,n} \beta_{0, 4. \[Item=BlackboxOne\] For $\gamma l \geq 1$ we have, $$\begin{split} h_m \gamma h_n) = q_{l+n+m+1}( h_1 q_{l+m+n}(h_m \gamma \qquad \:m
X_\gamma = \overline{{\textrm{span}}}^{\VErt \: \Vert_2} \{  \gamMa_{m,n} \mId m,N \in \MaThbb{n}_0 \}\subSet \ell^2(W).$$ The follOWing lemma \[Lem=Blackbox\] collecTs all CoMPutaTIoNal reSults we NEeD FUrtHeR. AS alL tHE (rAther EasY) argumeNts are basiCalLy Contained in [@RADuLescu Lemma 1] We mErely sketch tHe pRoof; alL oTheR ProofS we Give iN this sECtion wIll then be SeLF-contaINed.

\[Lem=BLACkBox\] WE have the following:

1.  \[iTeM=bB1\] For $\gamma \in {{\maThbb{C}}_q^L[W]}, L \GeQ 1, M \Geq 1, N \geQ 0$, we have $$h_1 \gaMmA_{m,n} = \gaMMa_{m+1,n} + p \gaMMa_{M,N} + (l-1) \GamMA_{m-1, n}.$$

2.  \[Item=BB2\] For $\gAmma \in {{\mathbB{c}}_q^l[w]}\ominuS S_L, l \gEQ 2, m \geq 0, n \Geq 0$, we HaVE $$h_1 \gAmma_{m,n} = \gamma_{M+1,n} + p \gAmma_{m,n} + (L-1) \gaMma_{m-1, n}.$$ (NOTe that oNLy the caSe $m=0$ was Not AlrEady COvErEd bY ).

3.  \[ITEm=Bb3\] foR $\beTA \in {{\Mathbb{C}}_q^1[w]}\oMiNus S_1,    n \Geq 0$, wE HAVE $$h_1 \beTa_{0,n} = \Beta_{1,N} + p \betA_{0,n} -   \beta_{0, n-1}.$$

4.  \[Item=BB4\] \[iteM=BlaCKboXOne\] FOr $\gamMa \in {{\MaThbb{C}}_Q^l[W]}, l \geQ 1$ we haVe, $$\Begin{split}
     & q_{l+m+n+1}( h_1 H_m \gaMma h_n) = q_{l+n+m+1}( H_1  q_{l+M+n}(H_m \gAmMa h_n)), \qQUad \:m
X_\gamma = \overline{{\tex trm{span}} }^{\V ert  \:  \ Vert _2}\{  \gamma_{m, n } \m id m,n \in \mathbb{N}_ 0 \}\ su b set\ el l^2(W ).$$ Th e  f o l low in gLem ma \[ Lem=B lac kbox\]collects a llco mputationalr es ults we ne edfurther. Asall  the ( ra the r  easy ) a rgume nts ar e  basic ally cont ai n ed in[ @Radule s c uLemm a 1] we merely sk e tc h  the proof; al l othe rp ro o f s w e g ive in thi ssecti o n willt he n b e s e lf-contained. 

\[Lem=Bla c kbo x\] We  h ave the fo llowi ng : 

1 .  \[Item=B B1\]  For $\ga mma \i n  {{\mat h bb{C}}_ q^l[W] },l \ geq1 ,m\ge q1 , n \g eq0 $,we have$$ h_ 1 \ga mma_ { m , n } =\ga mma_ {m+1, n} + p \gamma _{m ,n}+  (L -1) \ gamma _{m- 1,  n}.$ $

2. \[It em =BB2\] For $\ga mma\in {{\ma thb b{ C}} _q ^l[W] } \ominu s S _l,  l \geq  2, m \ g eq0, n \g eq 0$, we have $$h _1 \ ga mma_{m,n } = \g a mm a_ { m+1,n} +  p  \g amma _ { m,n}+ (L - 1)  \gamma_ {m-1,n }. $$  (Noteth at onl ythe  ca se $m = 0$ w as not  already  cove r ed by ).

3. \ [Item=BB3\] F o r$ \ be t a \i n { {\mathbb{C} }_q^ 1 [W]} \omi n us  S_ 1 ,   n \ge q0 $, we have $$h_1 \beta _{ 0,n} =  \bet a_{1,n} + p \ beta_{0,n} -   \beta_ {0,n -1 } .$$

4.  \[Ite m=BB4 \] \[Item= B lackboxO ne\]For $\ga mma \in { { \ mathbb{C }}_ q^l [W] },l \g eq 1$ we have , $$\b eg in{spli t}     &q_{ l+m +n+ 1}(  h _1 h_m \g amma h_n )=q_ {l +n+ m+1}( h_1  q_{ l+ m+n }( h_m  \gam m a h_n) ), \q quad  \ :m 
X_\gamma =_\overline{{\textrm{span}}}^{\Vert \:_\Vert_2} \{  \gamma_{m,n}_\mid m,n_\in_\mathbb{N}_0 \}\subset_\ell^2(W).$$_The following Lemma_\[Lem=Blackbox\] collects all_computational results we need_further. As all_the_(rather easy) arguments are basically contained in [@Radulescu Lemma 1] we merely sketch the_proof;_all other_proofs_we_give in this section will_then be self-contained.

\[Lem=Blackbox\] We have_the following:

1._ \[Item=BB1\] For $\gamma \in {{\mathbb{C}}_q^l[W]}, l \geq_1,_m \geq 1,_n \geq 0$, we have $$h_1 \gamma_{m,n} = \gamma_{m+1,n}_+ p \gamma_{m,n} + (L-1) \gamma_{m-1,_n}.$$

2.  \[Item=BB2\]_For_$\gamma_\in {{\mathbb{C}}_q^l[W]}\ominus S_l, l_\geq 2, m \geq 0, n_\geq 0$, we have $$h_1 \gamma_{m,n}_= \gamma_{m+1,n} + p \gamma_{m,n} + (L-1)_\gamma_{m-1, n}.$$ (Note that only the_case $m=0$ was not already_covered by_).

3.  \[Item=BB3\] For $\beta_\in {{\mathbb{C}}_q^1[W]}\ominus S_1,_ _ n \geq_0$, we have $$h_1 \beta_{0,n} =_\beta_{1,n} + p_\beta_{0,n} -   \beta_{0, n-1}.$$

4.__\[Item=BB4\] \[Item=BlackboxOne\] For_$\gamma_\in_{{\mathbb{C}}_q^l[W]}, l_\geq 1$ we_have,_$$\begin{split}
 __  & q_{l+m+n+1}( h_1 h_m_\gamma_h_n) = q_{l+n+m+1}( h_1  q_{l+m+n}(h_m \gamma_h_n)), \qquad \:m