6), for example, differentiated the two groups very well at end of study (q=0.92), correlated strongly with change in fat intake (r=O.83) and moderately with baseline fat intake(r=0.51). These findings are highly promising but before these markers become widely applicable in epidemiologic
6), for example, differentiated the two groups very well at end of discipline (q=0.92), correlate strongly with change in fat intake (gas constant = O.83) and moderately with baseline fat intake(r=0.51). These findings are highly bright but before these markers become widely applicable in epidemiologic
6), fog example, differentiated the two groups very wxll at snd of sgudy (q=0.92), correlated strongly wmth xhangt in fat intake (r=O.83) xnd moderwtely wirh beseline fat intake(r=0.51). Thesc finslngs crx highly promislng but befmre these markarr yecome widely applicable in epidemiojogic
6), for example, differentiated the two groups at of study correlated strongly with and with baseline fat These findings are promising but before these markers become applicable in epidemiologic
6), for example, differentiated tHe two groupS very WelL at EnD of sTudy (Q=0.92), correlated strONgly With change in fat intake (r=o.83) and mOdERateLY wIth baSeline fAT iNTAke(R=0.51). THeSe fInDInGs are HigHly promIsing but beForE tHese markers bECoMe widely apPliCable in epideMioLogic
6), for example, different iated thetwo g rou psve ry w ellat end of stud y  (q= 0.92), correlated stro nglywi t h ch a ng e infat int a ke ( r=O .8 3)  an dm od erate lywith ba seline fat  in ta ke(r=0.51).T he se finding s a re highly pr omi sing b ut  be f ore t hes e mar kers b e come w idely app li c able i n  epidem i o lo gic
6), for_example, differentiated_the two groups very_well at_end_of study_(q=0.92),_correlated strongly with_change in fat_intake (r=O.83) and moderately_with baseline fat_intake(r=0.51)._These findings are highly promising but before these markers become widely applicable in epidemiologic