: >But if entertainment (company) sell computer programs saying they are virus 
: >safe. Doesn`t they have burden of proof that viruses don`t exist in their 
: >floppies ?

: I don't think so.  The assumption is there.  If it turns out that
: their software has a virus, then it is up to you to prove that fact
: to a court to get any damages.  You are theoretically suppossed to 
: be able to get damages for that, but you have to give some evidence
: that the virus came from that software.  But since the computer
: company is the defendent, they are uninvolved until proven guilty.

All right. I'm not and won't be lawyer. What about doctors?
I going to fly aeroplane (or drive car). Doctors have to look for different
kind of illnesses in me before I get permission to fly an aeroplane.
They have burden of proof that "harmful illnesses don't exist in me",
do they ?

(I'm just questioning my belief that believers have the burden of proof.)

: Please, not Pascal!  NOOOOO!! ;)
Oh!  Are you those bug-generator C-programmers  ? :-)
Turbo Pascal is the BEST and FASTEST for edit-run-edit-run cycles !
----------------------- ktikkane@phoenix.oulu.fi -------------------
  Kari Tikkanen      !   .  . -#- !      b        !   begin  