    >Clayton, babe, please define the word `molest`. Are you using
    >a legal term or a proper dictionary term? Molest, as far as I
    >can remember, means `to do damage to person(s)`. My mate,
    >Mike, was lured into a woman's parlour when he was 14. Is
    >that molestation? A number of my friends (straight) lost
    >their virginity before that. Were they 'molested'? They told
    >me that they thoroughly enjoyed the experience. I see no
    >damage.
    >
    >Please stop pushing your objective morality on others. If you
    >push, people won't fall over and say 'Ye gads, you're
    >right!', they'll just push back.
    >
    >Have you signed up for that logic course yet?

Yep -- and the child that "Tree Frog Johnson" adbucted for 6 months reportedly
"enjoyed" her experiences as well. They trained her using food. As an FBI
agent reported (on his disciplinary action for beating up "Tree Frog") "when
you see a 2&1/2 year old baby cheerfully tell you she wants a peanut butter
sandwich and she'll suck your pee-pee, you lose control".

You are quite sick.


-- 
There are actually people that STILL believe Love Canal was some kind of
environmental disaster. Weird, eh?