, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

We are not assessing the truth claims of a religion - we are assessing the historicity of an individual.  I would actually be quite happy for evidence to exist - it would make the subject more interesting and wouldn't cause the least problem for my view that the supernatural is merely wishful thinking.  Proving a certain man existed ~2000 years ago is a long way from turning him in to a god!  I'm pretty certain Michael Travesser exists, but he ain't anything other than a delusional man - despite what he and his followers believe.
As for your weak attack on my lack of expertise, it's irrelevant.  I'm as capable of sourcing and quoting expert references as the next person.  Wikipedia would be a desolate place if your reinvention of policy was implemented and only experts were able to contribute.  Your irrationality is beginning to show - 'Jesus historicity' and 'Jesus myth' are very much the same thing.  If you don't wish to participate in discussions that trouble you, you will find Conservapedia.com a far more comforting environment.   19:59