"
More, about the Binienda's researches, please get familiar with it [please http://www.ecgf.uakron.edu/~civil/people/binienda/Parlament%20November%202011%20-%20English.pdf here]. The simulation of the collision with the tree made with different initial parameters, also with increased diameter and endurance of the tree and decreased the endurance of the wing. But it should not be even considered if the plane flew over the birch, as it was in the trajectory: . And as for , I just want to find a rational explanation, which MAK's and Miller's reports are absolutely not, containing all the internal contradictions. Let me ask you, do you really believe in all that things, like that the plane with wingspan over 37m flying at the height of 5m hits the ""armored birch"", loose its wing, turns arround (actually some parts are moving under the ground!), suddenly accelerates up with 8-10 g, hits the ground and breaks into many thousands of pieces and the wing fragment is found at an inexplicable distance of the tree?   "