"

You display your ignorance. The dim bulb in question was paranoid and he was stupid, the classic definitions without a shade of exaggeration. An accurate description isn't an insult, censor. Why you people feel the need to interfere when you don't understand is beyond me.

When cletus wrote his stupid paranoid schlock viz 

""I do not support the interjection of ""However, this accomplishment was short live."" That does not make sense. That sentence takes away from his great accomplishment. It infers that he did something wrong or something happened and he did not act. It has a negative connotation. What is the point of that sentence?

There should be an entire section devoted to his accomplishment of paying off the national debt.

Subtle propaganda

The diction does not make sense and should be changed or removed.""

That is paranoid and stupid. In fact if you're censoring me surely that garbage should also have been censored on the grounds that it is incoherent babble or whatever euphemism you censors use."