"
 Is Occupy Oakland ongoing or defunct?  

I concur with 's reversions today on the Occupy movement and Occupy Oakland articles, where other users (possibly vandals) attempted to cast Occupy in the past tense. It's premature to portray the overall movement as deceased. However, solely with respect to Occupy Oakland, this is an issue worth discussing.

Note that the Infobox at Occupy Oakland differs from those on Wikipedia's pages for Occupy movement and Occupy Wall Street, respectively. Occupy Oakland is the only one where the word ""ongoing"" appears—once on the Date line and again on a separate Status line.

I submit that Occupy Oakland's lack of activity over the past several months suggests that it may now be time to reconsider Wikipedia's use of ""ongoing"" applied exclusively to Occupy Oakland.

There is currently a small amount of autonomous organizing around two upcoming anniversaries: the group's October 10 birthday and the October 25 riot where Scott Olsen was shot in the head. However, none of this stems from Occupy Oakland collectively or any of its designated committees. It's being conducted strictly by self-appointed individuals. Even allowing that anniversary activities are likely to take place, the question looms: do these constitute evidence of an ""ongoing"" group or are they merely nostalgic gestures by a few diehard remnants?

I hope  and other experienced Wikipedia editors will clarify this for me. Please, at what point do we stop referring to Occupy Oakland as ongoing?   "