". It instantly registered as vandalism (incorrectly, I hope) in my mind and I reverted it. I went back and put your revision back as a Good Faith edit. I let you guys work it out on the talk page. Sorry for the inconvenience.   Ndenison talk 

No worries - you are right to be vigilant! The issue attracts passions on both sides!   

 Big Four auditors external link deleted 

Hey Ndenison, you recently deleted external link added by me to Big Four auditors page. Indeed, I recently added such a link and it was deleted by OhNoitsJamie. However, in course of discussion Jamie recognized that this link could be added: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Ohnoitsjamie#Thanks_for_the_notice.21
So, could you please reverse the deletion back? Thanks. BIG4PAPA.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.123.240.181   

Done.  As a side note, since you have an account, use that to edit.  I assumed that this edit was from just another ip adding spam.  Also, sign your posts on talk pages with 4 tildas (~~~~).  Have a good day, and sorry for the inconvenience.   Ndenison talk 

 Thanks, Ndenison. I would also ask your advise. I strongly believe that ilovebig4.com should be also externally linked from 4 more pages - big four companies pages: Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu, Ernst & Young, KPMG, PricewaterhouseCoopers. ilovebig4.com even as of now has dozens of news and other stuff related to each of these companies. I believe it will be useful for those people who try to find out more about these companies. So, here is the question. Do you think it will be appropriate to add such links? Thanks for the insight. BIG4PAPA.

I don't know as I am not familiar with those articles.  My only advice would be to go to the talk pages of those articles and ask that question.   Ndenison talk 

 Thanks, Ndenison!   

Rationale

My dear fellow - what is yours? 92.4.216.135  

I'll be completely honest with you.  Some of the stuff I see is pretty funny, and sometimes I chuckle.  However, I use Wikipedia quite often to research random subjects.  With that being said, I don't like to see stupid crap plastering an article.  If you want to vandalize something besides an article (i.e. user pages, talk pages, etc.), I really don't care as long as its not mine.  Other people might care but not me.  Just leave the articles alone, unless of course you're adding useful information.   Ndenison talk 

 Hair trigger revert? 

You reverted my changes to Game Artificial Intelligence in the cheating AI section. These changes focused the section on the importance of cheating to AI itself; the section as it stood got too distracted by the wider considerations of cheating, and by specific examples.

I understand that, as an anon, I get less consideration. But please actually compare before/after in context. Trimming can be constructive too.

 Hickson Compact Group 

Perhaps you should read the article first. This article is not about HCG44, and therefore, it does not have a location, or a picture. The picture can be used illustratively, but the INFOBOX cannot. 70.55.86.165  

 Brass Knuckles 

Why did you revert my edit?   
My edit is not vandalism!! Stop it!!! [[Us