I'm clearly confused then. I don't know about point A, but there is a section in Buchanan's article regarding his personal relationships with his fiancee and her subsequent death, and then with Rufus King, the gossip it caused during his time, and the conclusions some historians have come to as a result of reading Buchanan's own correspondence, as well as what others wrote about him. I'm concerned that if we're required to prove that all the people on our list had regular sexual relations with people of the same sex, our list would be limited to porn stars - theirs would be caught on film. Yes, it's an exaggeration, but what sort of evidence is required in the inclusion to our list? Moni3