"NN, POV  Material is not notable, and appears to be a POV push against the subject, the band Insane Clown Posse.  Structural bias in article title, ""Gay ICP"", as well.  
Delete, of course; I am the nominator.   
Comment on further inquiry, article Gay ICP seems to be the worst creation of  
Huh?, Hasn't Kasreyn vandalized the main ICP page?. 
 Why is this here?. Any claims on sexual preferences of the band belong on the band article (ICP), but Kasreyn has edited this addition and many others out, because it didn't coincide with his POV.  
Keep it per nom.  
Keep it as above. (| UlTiMuS (  | T | C | E ) 
Comment  I'm seeing very strong support here; does anyone agree this is a case for a speedy delete?   
What? Been hearing voices, Kasreyn? Aside from your numerous comments Kasreyn, I don't see much support of your POV. 
Comment I wouldn't speedy delete this article. I disagee that this material is ""unreliable""I think it is notable, and not designed to bias the subject any more than it would be to say that Charles Nelson Reilly is gay. That said, I do believe that the structural bias in the article title is unacceptable, so this article should probably be deleted, but its content merged with the main article. I think it's a biased attempt by fans of ICP to keep this information out of the main article, and that the creator of this article was taking a valid stand by creating it if ICP fans are putting their own POV in the article.  
Comment I'm not sure on what grounds you can propose to delete this article, or a remove it from the main ICP article. 
Comment It is that noteworthy and verified.  The text makes a reference to an interview in a magazine.  I have found the source of the material.  The article lists four references which are quite relevant information and are only there to make the article more substantial.  Personally, I am not a fan of the group or their style of music and do not care if the statements are true or false.  I am just trying to preserve the integrity of the article. If you can show me one valid reason for deletion, then I would consider supporting removing this from wiki.  
Save it I personally verified these sources, and they all exceed expectations. Riviting stuff people. >Riddlebox Wraithz 
Hold on per all the lovely comments above.  I don't think it's speedyible under wikipedian legislation at all. Northenglish 
Interesting It's interesting, and more than just POV since it's verifiably true.  It might be worth briefly mentioning it in the main ICP article as well. 
Agreed per nom.   

"