"
I understand that small edits in good article must be well constructed in order to be accepted by ""editors"". What i dont understand, why reliably sourced edits with important information rise displeasure. If it is important to you that PSG1 article is good, you must be happy. Instead of ""50 rounds of match-grade inside of an 80 mm circle at 300 meters"" (as i understand this bullshit is suitable and ""professional"" for ""encyclopedia"") now article contains at least some fact about accuracy. To note, probably all match-grade ammunition for 7.62x51 (like M118 match, M852 match) have guaranteed extreme spread about 2 MOA at 300 meters for 50 shots.69.141.140.192  "