"

 Request 

Hey Kirill. In the Ryulong case voting page, finding 15 states ""Mythdon has been posting notes at Ryulong's talk page about Ryulong's use of the rollback feature for more than a year"" which is not evidenced in the evidence in the finding. In fact, another statement in the finding contradicts that by saying ""However, most of Mythdon's posts in early 2009 consisted of warnings in relation to Ryulong's use of the rollback tool"". I made a similar post on the voting talk page, see here but there was no response. The posts in 2008 were just useless questions, and that the diffs in the finding do not evidence any rollback warning in 2008 nor does it evidence that I was making warnings for over a year. You as well as other Arbitration Committee members voted in support of the finding, but I hope the false statement in the finding is fixed. Could you please fix this problem in a solution you think is necessary? Thanks. — (talk • contribs) "