"
The first question that is important for me is the accuracy of the first block about ""tendentious"" edits in Macedonian Muslims. An administrator with particilar POV om Macedonian question, without warning blocked an editor (i.e. me) with a contrary POV. (Nevertheless that until this moment the administrator didn't made some edits in the concrete article).Then this disputable blocking is an argument against me.
The second problem is why some of the other administrators denied to look profoundly: The only caution by some other editor after my first blocking, until I stop my edits in the article is this - with a very ""substantial"" argument: ""Stop wasting everybodys time!"". Then the other opponent, made his reverts with call to find consensus. Maybe, hasting to defend your colleague Future Perfect at Sunrise, you didn't notice that after it I didn't made some edits - nevertheless that some editors deleted important info with relevant sources. Also maybe you didn't notice, that there were editors who supported my efforts to find more neutral way - , . However, my objections about abuse power of one administrator who is involved in these themes are actual.  "