"

 Editing problems Steer Wrestling 

Montanabw is making sweeping, unsourced statements - statements that he/she is presenting as ""facts that everyone knows, and thus need no sourcing"". Mbw's profile page indicates he/she is a horse person living in Montana. I think Mbw's is approaching the subject with a proprietary bias and simply does not want a researched, documented ""Animal Abuse in Rodeo"" controversy presented. Mbw is minimizing my contributions while maximizing his/hers. Mbw is very slightly altering my contributions to reflect a ""this is an animal nut"" statement sort of thing. In one contribution I named a veterinarian with work in rodeo and included her credentials and her professional observations. Mbw reduced the contribution to ""a spokesman for an animal rights group."" So how come you are supporting someone who is actually damaging the article, and coming down hard on someone who is trying to improve and cover all the bases in the discussion? You should be telling Mbw the same thing you are telling me  if you don't want your material to be heavily edited then don't contribute. Mbw is minimizing the Animal Abuse Controversy (which is a valid point in the article and has its own little section within the article) in order to sell her pro-rodeo agenda  claims of being neutral and balanced notwithstanding. IMO, Mbw should be balancing my points with his/her own researched and documented points. Not ""editing"" mine to reflect his/her point. Leave mine alone, mine are researched, documented, and neutral.   "