"

Since it appears that you have escalated your case to ArbCom, there is really no point in echoing your arguments on your talk page in this way.  You should offer any further information directly and exclusively to ArbCom via e-mail.  If they decide to believe you and reinstate your account, you can share the news here with the rest of us at that time.

Also, previously, I offered you some very concrete suggestions for establishing who you are (as opposed to making claims of who you are not).  If you are not in fact ""Justice Forever"" and are serious about wanting to convince ArbCom of this fact, I would strongly recommend you follow those suggestions ASAP.  Your latest piece of ""new evidence"" is really about the same as trying to clear your name via a checkuser request — something which, as you should already understand, is almost never accepted as a way of disproving sockpuppet allegations, and which in fact is more often taken as evidence that you are a sock trying to blow smoke in people's faces.  Unless you present your most convincing information to ArbCom right now, you are likely to find them unwilling to listen to anything further you might have to say, regardless of its merits.

I'm going to stop watching your talk page at this point.  If you are a sock of ""Justice Forever"", you're wasting my time — and if you are not ""Justice Forever"", I may be wasting your time by making you feel there is a reason to continue arguing your case here (and in this particular way) rather than talking only to ArbCom and trying to make the kind of case with them that has a chance (though I don't know how much of a chance) of actually working.  Further posting of your arguments here, on your talk page, is very likely to make some admin decide to block you from being able to edit your talk page (and also to semi-protect your talk page to keep you from editing via IP addresses without logging in first).

Good luck, or good riddance, depending on who you really are.   (talk · contribs) "