(UTC)

Tennessee had not reapportioned since 1901, rural districts over-represented, urban districts under-represented

http://books.google.com/books?id=_MGEIIwT5pUC&pg;=PA551&lpg;=PA551&dq;=%22Baker+v.+Carr%22&source;=bl&ots;=4W4KMrd94i&sig;=Qm3RIPIjk4tce84yn0AE5Af2P2Q&hl;=en&sa;=X&ei;=7csrULysCMK5ywGetYHIAQ&ved;=0CDYQ6AEwADgK#v=onepage&q;=%22Baker%20v.%20Carr%22&f;=false

Baker v. Carr - 369 U.S. 186 (1962)
Held:

“  .  .  .  We hold that the dismissal was error, and remand the cause to the District Court for trial and further proceedings consistent with this opinion.  .  .  ”

I think some of our article is overly technical.  Or, overly technical to the exclusion of the straightforward, for we want to include both.    16:34, 15 August 2012