"
So his summaries weren't ""AS"" antagonistic.  So whichever person is a bit more antagonistic gets the warning.  Good to know.  On to your second claim: I still don't understand how *I* have a ""pattern of edit warring,"" but Olyeller doesn't when: (1) I added a completely valid and relevant and referenced sentence; and (2) OlYeller repeatedly removed it for NO VALID REASON; and (3) Olyeller falsely claimed in his summary that the issue was presented in the talk page.  So it's odd that falsifying summaries isn't considered a form of antagonism and/or worthy of a warning. The only reason OlYeller removed it is because he has a really big anti-Carbonator grudge. I once called him a ""thin-skinned prick"" and he took it badly.  He now confirms the validity of said appellation by obsessively searching for ANY of my edits and reverting them, which is exactly what he did in this case.  How is that not vandalism?   "