", 11 September 2008 (UTC)

[Moved post from Sarah down to proper chronological space; it interrupted my unblock request subsection placed chronologically before it above.   ]

As one of the victims of your repeated and persistent personal attacks and false accusations, I don't think that you should be unblocked early because I feel that a message needs to be sent about your continued personal attacks, blatant violations of AGF, CIVIL and NPA, which are even prominently displayed on this very talk page in your lengthy commentaries about Orderinchaos in particular. I have tried to stay away from here since the ANI was closed, but as you continue making accusations and comments about me, I must say that I consider your comments to be personal attacks and I consider the post that Gnangarra linked to in particular to be defamatory and libelous and I feel that you should agree to refactor those comments, and the other personal attacks you made about editors on ANI, as I see has also been previously suggested by Shell as well. The ""do not edit the archive"" notices in the ANI archives are designed to prevent people from continuing discussions in the archives, rather than to prevent people removing defamatory material. You claim that you've been ""slandered"" (actually libeled). I believe everything I have said about you has been absolutely true, however, if I have inadvertently made a mistake and it was pointed out to me, I would redact it. Unfortunately, every time I have interacted with you you have made demonstrably false accusations, accusing me of doing things I had clearly and provably not done at all and so I am rather reluctant to believe that I have posted something factually untrue, but I am quite prepared to go back and re-examine my comments and refactor if I have made a mistake. When you wrote these offensive and defamatory comments about me, I had been deliberately trying to refrain from saying very much on the ANI due to your previous hostile reactions to me and had actually made very few comments, only responding to people who were confused or misunderstood and thus your accusations at that point in time were totally over the top and unfair and did not measure up to the evidence of my posts. Additionally, you are completely anonymous and not known by your real life identity, whereas I have spent most of my time on Wikipedia editing under my full name and am well known and you yourself have even commented about knowing my full name, so I find your comments and accusations defamatory to me in the real world. I feel you should agree to refactor your personal attacks against, not just myself, but others too, and I must therefore support previous requests for you to refactor these personal attacks and false accusations. Please also note that BLP applies to all pages on Wikipedia, not just to articles, Wikipedia:BLP#Non-article_space, and so if you persist in keeping your personal comments about me, a living, known and identifiable person, I must once again for the nth time insist that you provide verifiable proof supporting your allegations and accusations because you are in violation of BLP. Sarah 

Gnan, Shell, Sarah: Please see reply posted to Shell below #Malfunctioning archive bot and improper page creations? prior to the reply by Sarah; did not see it; restored proper chronological order to these posts.  Sarah: In #request (first line of my reply) I already gave permission to Gnan/garra to do what is needed in that now-unmentionable (for me) matter to remove from it anything that might be (mis)construed as a ""personal attack"" by anyone reading it WP:NPA in reply to #request; but I myself do not feel comfortable touching an archived discussion in a project page, which is filled with comments that could be (mis)construed as ""personal attacks"" upon me as well (""rant"", ""screed"", expletives, etc.).  Please post comments chronologically.  The bot functions to archive them that way.  Thanks.   04:35"