"

Vandalism by Muslim editors

Given a perception by Indian media that Amicus Curiae has ""accused"" Modi, many muslims and some pseudo liberals are trying to deviate the actual 25 Page report of Mr Raju Ramchandran, which actually praises and absolve Modi of all the conspiracy and other charges. Mr Raju as a lawyer express a Probability that ""If Sanjiv Bhatt is true, lets assume then a case can be lodge and if Modi is found innocent in court then the case can be closed"". This is the whole report of amicus curiae which has been distorted by Indian Media as ""Evidence against Modi"". Here are the releveant sources hope , all of you will go through the whole report(its only 25 pages).

http://ibnlive.in.com/news/gujarat-riots-teestas-plea-for-report-rejected/271651-3-238.html

http://www.firstpost.com/india/sit-vs-amicus-curiae-report-a-triumph-of-democracy-308146.html(wonderful article, the exaggeration of amicus report by indian media completely exposed)

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:IwFYBbPGTv8J:www.thehindu.com/news/national/article3401728.ece+amicus+rely+on+sanjiv+bhatt&cd;=9&hl;=en&ct;=clnk&gl;=in

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:vQnm40YKpi4J:tarabenmojagar.in/city-news/%3Fp%3D842+sanjiv+bhatt+strategiser&hl;=en&gl;=in&prmd;=imvns&strip;=1(Sanjiv Bhatt a strategiser as pointed by Amicus himself, his point that who is SIT to reject sanjiv bhatt evidence and that Modi should prove himself innocent are both useless.)

In short Mr Raju wants Modi to prove his innocence in Court. As far as i know the constitution , One has to be proven guilty in Court and not that one has to prove his innocence in court. Similarly who is SIT to reject Sanjiv Bhatt evidence. ""SCIENCE"" and ""MODERN TECH"" are the one to reject Sanjiv bhatt(congress agent) evidence , the time at which he claimed he was with Modi , however his Mobile record shows that he was 200 KM away from Modi Office that whole Day.  "