First of all I did mention there were 5700 SNPs in the Seldin 2006 research. the 749 were the actively used. 2. I did not question the quality of the Bauchet 2007 research. 3. I do not propose the current pic should be replaced with the 3D graphs. All i'm saying is since they are both valid researches they should both be presented. 4. the motive of the re-adding of the Seldin 3D graphs is purely for illustrative purposes to any reader of the article. It's a genetics article, not the Front Page News. Why should it be Laconic and so space economic? it's just a pic more =/ why not?
5. Compare the illustrative strength of the 3D graphs> Image:European_population_substructure.png with that of the cluster structures. this> Image:Bauchet European clusters.png and this> Image:Seldin geography.png both are poor illustrations by no-matter-how-good researches. Finding a better chart to show the Bauchet results would be the best thing. but do we have anything else? i don't have any political/racist motive. Wobble, you didn't even delete the pic. the Spanish guy did. Anyway, I just think the 3D charts are nice and easy for the reader to see how genetic samples scatter throughout the nations of Europe. like that> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Cavallisforzageneclusters.jpg pic. All the other illustrations are confusing and not directly useful to draw conclusions from. just a thought.