==Please read unblock request carefully

This why I ask whoever read my request to read it carefully , I will address your points in order of when your address them.

First, your said that you will work with the editor to help make the page notable, yet that is what I was asking for throughout the entire debate before I was blocked, for someone to help me make the page notable. I cannot help showing I was annoyed when everyone who posted on that debate was making negative comments and continued to push for it to be deleted. Seen as I was the person making ALL the editing, it is the responsibility for administrators to assist me making all pages in question notable. I had already said sorry for the choice of words I've made throughout the debate but again it is as if no-one has the desire to care whether a user is remorseful of his action so long as the debate can continue, with or without them. 

Second, if the only party that was trying to defend the case was blocked and prevent not only from actively defending the pages in question, but stopped from actually adding the references and making the page more notable, well I'm sorry but I was doing my best all things considering. Even before I was blocked from Wikipedia, I did add in more reference, I read some of the notability guild lines and did make some changes, however I am only one person and there is so much I could do before I can say, 'I done my fair share, can someone help me finish this?'. But clearly not. I really don't know Wikipedia as well as you and other administrators do, but considering I have made many pages and edited many more in the short time I have started using Wikipedia properly, I can say that I have made useful information for people to read about and get accurate accounts of this. My point with this is that even though I have made massive contributions on here, there are things I do not know, and how to get pages back on Wikipedia after they are deleted is one of them. So if you kindly give me details and links on how to do this would be most appreciated.

I still fail to see why it is disrupted behaviour to return pages back on Wikipedia the way I have, a page before on Ryan Shamrock (fighter) was speedily deleted and then returned back on here, but not by me, and up until just today, no-one has affected that. The user who is suggesting it has also recommended 10 other pages for deletion, however, the user clearly doesn't know the fighters he wants deleted, as 7 of them are/have competed in either a major MMA promotion or a second tier promotion. As he is doing such pointless acts, I still wonder why he's able to do this knowing he will get into trouble with other admins for the similar things I've done? Here is the link for this debate - Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryan Shamrock (fighter).

I get what you do mean when you say that it isn't about Shark Fights or Ring of Combat when it comes to this debate now, but none the less it is still an issue not to be ignored. UCMMA/Cage Rage UK was deleted for the same reasons that those two promotions, as well as a few other promotions on WP:MMANOT, should be. I find it amazing how these promotions are actually accepted by certain admins and are allowed to remain on there whilst a promotion I've been helping with, that has a better laid out page than the others and was making the improvements the other users were screaming on about doing for it, yet it got deleted, whilst those others ones get treated like they are highly ranked promotions. UCMMA/Cage Rage UK has a weekly chat show on Sky Sports 4, whilst showing their delayed timed events on Sky Sports 3, I bet those other promotions don't even get TV time.

The head of Cage Rage UK never asked me to post those articles. I have always worked by myself to help them with their Wikipedia page, never even expecting a thank you because I like their product and want to help other find reliable sources on them, which as many knows, Wikipedia is the place for that. If you type in UCMMA in the Facebook search bar, find the one with a picture of the words 'Cage' on the top, 'Rage' in the middle, and 'UK.com' at the bottom, then like their page, then keep looking for any posts from Carl Gale, as I keep mentioning to look on Wikipedia for UCMMA/Cage Rage UK information, fights at certain events etc. Look as far back as the 1st September 2011, you will clearly see that not only was UCMMA not part of it, they were pretty much telling me that all their information can be found on their website and their Facebook account so there was no need to continue doing it. However, I kept working on the Wikipedia pages, making contributions whenever possible leading up until their UCMMA 24 - Hands of War event. Once a few days went by after the event, the Head of Media for Cage Rage UK started to post Wall messa