So this argument you're employing is something you support that is hardly a credible source compared to FAS, Globalsecurity, Finance Yahoo, CNBC, the likes.  But you're giving more validity to 1 person.  It's like an argument we should support the HUMINT that people claims that the Pentagon admits that WP is a chemical weapon.  Valid Sources matter.  Not a site that a person agrees with.  This is not yours or  as you're trying to make it.