"

 First you tell me that I must stop commenting on my blog, and that others have been blocked it. Then you quote a WP policy saying ""an editor may not be directly penalized for off-wiki attacks"". Which is it? Both, I guess. WP admins violate their own rules when they penalize people, I guess.
 Yes, I did say that ""Darwinism"" is used by the scientific community, and I gave a source to prove it. Maybe you are just agreeing with me, I'm not sure.
 I don't know why you say that it is unacceptable to say, ""Apparently FeloniousMonk believes that it is pseudoscience to reappraise the evidence."" Isn't that his position? Hasn't he made edits to the J.Wells biography in order to push that POV? If that is not his position, then what is?
 All I am doing here is throwing a little light on how some of these WP evolution-related articles are edited. You appear to be just trying to whitewash what FeloniousMonk and others are doing. There is no WP policy against me explaining some WP edits.  "