Please either remove or put a footnote against the follwing tribes for their Pashtun affiliation being 'suspect': Mashwanis (Sayyads); Miankhel (Spiritual leaders/Arabs); Swatis (contested; Ghilzais (Turks); Burki (not really Pashtun only Pushtunised); Dilazaks (Hazara Gazetteer has noted caution); Gandpur (are of Arab origin); Jehangiri (same as for other Swatis and Wardak (a feographic entity). If we can accept the foregoing as Pashtuns then the Tanolis are to be unconditionally accepted too. I do not accept a Punjabi 'Raja' dictating terms here and other Pashtuns accepting them. It's either all of them in or none of them remaining in the tribal list. Supersaiyan has been shown up to be a liar and fabricator of history regarding the Tanawalis as being of Janjua origin. We do not wish to be didtated to by outsiders. Tanawalis historians themselves, as well as others, trace their ancestory to Afghanistan not Punjab. The term Hinkowan is properly only applicable to Kharays of Peshawar not to Hazara. The greater number of Jehangiri and other Swatis speak Hindo as do many other Pashtun tribes of Hazara most notably the Jaduns so they are not considered Hindkowans. Please be consisitent and remove the footnote from the list for Tanoli.
(User:Pakhtun Tanoli) 15:15 3 March 2007