Didn't call it abuse of administrator's rights at all, ever?  As I said, there was no consensus in the AFD as of yet.  In addition, you clearly don't understand what the purpose of an AFD is.  A person disagreeing with consensus and presenting alternative arguments is perfectly fine.  In the case of the AFD you're referring to, I presented an argument about his notability that is perfectly solid based on our established guidelines for biographies.  Just because a person disagrees with you doesn't mean that it's abuse of powers or disruptive.