"

I dismiss your RfC
I dismiss your RfC as nothing but harassment pure and simple. Why do you hate religion? Am I not allowed to edit on Wikipedia because I am not a radical secularist? I point out that your stereotypes about Evangelicals don't apply to everyone, and what do you do, you remove it? Am I supposed to stop being an Orthodox Catholic to edit Wikipedia? Or do you have to be a committed atheist to be ""credible""? It seems that you aren't interested in discussing the issues from an uninvolved third-person perspective, but instead it seems you use Wikipedia to grind an axe against Christianity.
How can you say that the crop of articles your work on are neutral, when there are many inaccuracies and stereotypes, etc. about politically active Christians found within? 
Christian Reconstructionism is an outgrowth of Calvinist theology, plain an simple. How can you say that I am POV pushing
Does NPOV equal secular Leftism? The Dominionism article is heavily slanted to the Left politically, and I haven't violated any rules by posting a POV tag there. Much of what I have read form people such as Yurica, Bokaer, etc., is nothing but guilt by association.
The edit warring has come from your side from the beginning. Chip Berlet is a political operative who isn't schooled in theology, and his observations paint with a broad brush, lacking historical insights into Christian views on Church and State. This isn't a personal attack. There shouldn't be a pro- or an anti-Dominionist bias. Your stated commitment to paint ""Dominionism"" as a threat is hardly NPOV.  
 "