very sorry if it seems like i am steam rolling what you are doing but i  have refrenced everything i have done and none of them have been simple reverts, in particular i feel that you have misunderstood the reference from the ava. this may sound strange but i feel that i am removing bias against mulesing, as you can see i have tried to remove the emotive language. tonight your move of the information to controversy got me thinking about cleaning up the article so i removed any duplicity i found this resulted in a much smaller controversy section but all the material is still in the article, except for info about the arthritis study i just couldnt find a place where it would fit, i have specifically answered the should/may question, if you have any other specific queries to what i have done jsut ask (on mulesing talk).