I did not abuse and threaten - another user came there out of nowhere and started a crisis by making abusive personal attacks on me. I had to defend against them, to every person who refused to ignore them. It was not threatening to state the serious wrongs that would be committed if Wikipedia claimed to even have even in theory any discretionary choice not to take entirely my side as the victim in such a situation. The situation was an offence. Any organisation that decides to take offence at being told it does not have a discretionary choice to bully, is corrupt. Admins here take personal bullying decisions without there being a defence process to go through that is judged by more than just the first other passing admin who acts on whim. Nobody can lose all rights without a defence process. What you have just said does not add up legally. You have put Wikipedia on public record as blaming victims. There is no prevention here, of mob rule. The public has to be warned so.