"

 Battle of Rajasthan 

While I am pleased the article has been retained (since I !voted Keep), I'm curious about the ""No Consensus"" conclusion when the !vote was about 15 to Keep versus about a half-dozen to Delete (discounting the nom's second vote in the survey). From this noticeboard discussion, the canvassing appears to have been on the Delete side (which means that if his friends are discounted, the !vote is more like 15 to 2 or 1. — Unless there was some Keep-canvassing on the other wise that I don't know about, could you change the result to a clear Keep rather than no-con? (That way the delete-minded won't be able to make any ""It could barely hang on the last time!"" arguments in future AfDs.) "