" (UTC)

Not that I'm going to argue that Redk's research methods are up to Wikipedia standards, but... ""no original research"", huh? I could say the same for the apparently unsourced mention in the article about which outnumbers which and in what genders! Unless there is a verifiable source for this, it really shouldn't stay. It bothers me that this has apparently been here for over a year, with no one questioning it OR sourcing it! \  16:54, 24 May 2007"