"::::: No, ""one"" would not assume that knowledge about alcoholism is the same as or implies knowledge about Alcoholics Anonymous, and I'm not even sure that he qualifies and an ""eminent"" expert on alcoholism. I also see you followed or found the link I provided for you yesterday. Yes, like I said then, the Knol is very good, but like it is also self-published. Since it is non peer-reviewed it cannot be used to establish credibility as an expert on any topic.  

 I have a life outside of Wikipedia and this edit warring and the exacting arguments to get self-published sources included in this article is really taking up more time than I can spend here. I'm taking this article back off my watch list  you win the war of attrition. Congratulations on having the time and energy to spend all day on Wikipedia bikeshedding. You've successfully pushed your POV (to it's detriment), decreased the quality of the article, and again frustrated me passed my capacity to collaborate on this article. Have a nice day.     

"