When I said “There is no legitimate controversy.” what I meant is that the issue is not controversial amongst legitimate scientists.

The portion of WP:UNDUE that I was referring to was the part that says “For example, the article on the Earth does not directly mention modern support for the Flat Earth concept, the view of a distinct minority; to do so would give undue weight to it.”

This article is discussing a mainstream view.  Cremo’s view is that of an ultra-minority.  It should not be discussed in this article.

Your suggestion that the mainstream view needs to be balanced by Cremo’s ridiculous view is inappropriate.  Attempts to treat pseudoscientific hogwash as if though it were just as legitimate as real science are prohibited by WP:VALID.  76.107.171.90