{{unblock|The user who had me blocked, has now, himself gone way past 3 reverts in the last 24 hours on the same article. Please explain why this user has not been blocked. I don't need to hear any more of the NOTTHEM shit, as I'm not asking to be unblocked. The Spike & Therefore duo have cleverly set this up so that I can't report him. So this unblock request is, for all intents and purposes, the only way I can inquire about this. There has to be one administrator who is on the level in this place. Why was I blocked, when I had not the right, but rather the duty to remove BLP inaccuracies? Why was I not given a chance to defend myself at the administrator's noticeboard, even though the complaintant never notified me after making the report, as required? Why has  an article, when policy clearly states that is not permissable? I've made a lot of good contributions to this encyclopedia, and I enjoy it. I'm willing to chalk my experience with Spike Wilbur up to one bad apple in the bunch. I realize admins stick together, and I get the fact that no one is willing to go over another administrator's head, and unblock me. The fact is User:Therefore has clearly broken 3RR. I have a hard time believing that any one user could have every single administrator here in his pocket? Spike Wilbur should see that this user has broken the same rule, at the same article. Obviously he's not going to do anything to rectify a situation that he created. I don't care about being unblocked. If Therefore is blocked, it will go a long way towards restoring my respect for this project. Is there one fair administrator here who will at least answer the questions I have posed?]]