": Looking at that page's revision history, you appear to have ""edit warred"" as much as anyone else. 
I urge you to re-read WP:BRD, specifically this passage:  
""BRD is not a valid excuse for reverting good-faith efforts to improve a page simply because you don't like the changes. Don't invoke BRD as your reason for reverting someone else's work or for edit warring: instead, provide a reason that is based on policies, guidelines, or common sense.""  

Examining the talk page where one would expect to find those reasons, we see multiple contributions from each of the ""edit warring"" editors, even IPs - except you. You raise exactly one objection ""Academic Questions ... does not appear to be peer reviewed"", which in fact it is and proof was presented on the talk page. Did I miss your response? I encourage you to return to the talk page and discuss. Page protection should not be used to settle content disputes. 104.156.240.153  

"