couldn't agree more! Sjo's 'method' appears to be that (sadly) typical mentality of deleting or reverting any new editor's referenced data in a manner which wholly contradicts Wiki policies, and especially against edits that actually conform to Wiki policies. Wikipedia is rapidly losing credibility as a Worldwide contribution site by having a select group of admins and editors who think they can act as judge, jury and God over anyone's edits that they might disagree with, whether or not it is a properly referenced and conform-to-policy.  The strap line about Wikipedia being a source that everyone can edit is becoming a pointless and hollow statement, when looking at the pattern of dictatorial and hypocritical editing policies applied by a core of prejudicial and arbitrary editors who seek to suppress any new input and then have the audacity to claim that the new editor is a troll. Sjo's arrogant reply to my question over whether  he should be reported for inconsistent application of Wiki policies sums it up. Editors like him are showing that Wikipedia and its concept of global participation is badly broken. Sad really, but there you go... It always seem to be the few arrogant egotistical ones who spoil it for all.