Hello 

Sometimes we agree.  Sometimes we don't, but it's all good as far as I am concerned.  I was not referring to you in any of my comments about shenanigans at NARM. The troublesome editors are often single purpose, and appear to be new.  These editors do a grave disservice because their noise tends to shield an editor like Cirt from legitimate criticisms and scrutiny.  You will notice that I did quite the opposite of what Cirt wanted at Santorum (neologism).  I am not any way in the habit of backing up Cirt.  It just happens that often he's right, though sometimes he's wrong. And I dislike the sock campaigns that have been been related to the Landmark Education and Church of Scientology articles and turned personal against Cirt.  Talk