"::::::OK Resolute.  Here's point 1 of many. Judy Bachrach was chosen as a commentator on the case by a major news organization, CNN.  That's a pretty credible source. This was not a case of the network contacting one side and letting them provide a spokesperson as sometimes happens with Ann Bremner (never presented as a reliable source by me.) I was previously blocked for saying that reliable sources are being rejected here because they have a POV that some editors don't like. A number of others editors have said precisely the same thing.  Judy Bachrach did say that in Italy you're ""guilty until proven innocent.""  It doesn't mean that she's not a reliable source because she said that; it means a realiable source said it whether any of the editors like it or not. Anna Momigliano said much the same thing in Foreign Policy Magazine.  They don't like Doug Preston. They don't like Paul Ciolino. The don't like John Q. Kelly. They don't like Steve Moore and implied he was an imposter.  A CBS documentary nominated for an Emmy Award is ""self publised"" and ""blogosphere.""  

"