"
 Actually, mark, Cla68 did see a problem with them. In fact, his first edit to your article was ""New American isn't reliable"", and his second was ""ditto"". In your current userspace draft you use obviously unrelaible www.futureconscience.com - ""Future Conscience comes from the thoughts and opinions mainly of one individual – R. A. Gordon...."" This is not a review of the sources of your userspace draft, merely a cherry pick of the lowest hanging fruit.   "