"
Stinging Swarm, I am prepared to AGF on your part, but are you a shell script or something? These people went to google books because they wanted to find evidence of their random claim that Iraq is also known as Mesopotamia. So they google their claim and lo and behold they get two hits, one in a dental journal of 1929, and one in a sociological study of Iraq of 1971. Then they decide that perhaps the 1971 study is more relevant than the 1929 dental journal and they ""reference"" the soundbite to that google hit, cited completely out of context. Have you ever considered WP:DUE and WP:LEAD, and the possibility that you can ""reference"" anything at all if you are allowed to use random soundbites you found on google books? Please try to remember that we are trying to write an encyclopedia here.  (𒁳) "