It's not clear to me and it's evidently not clear to whoever reverted you, so it would seem that it's not clear.  Here's how you can see that it's original research: Suppose I replaced it with a picture of some random guy that you didn't think looked Nordic.  I don't know, like Mickey Mouse or something.  Then I said it was obvious to me that Mickey Mouse looked Nordic and I wasn't taking the picture out.  Then what?  You demand a reliable source that says Mickey Mouse looks Nordic and that the Nazis considered him to look Nordic and therefore considered Mickey Mouse to be an example of their highest racial phenotype.  How else would we settle the issue?  I'm surprised that you don't see that, whether the guy looks Nordic or not, it's original research to claim that he looks Nordic without a source, since its based on subjective criteria.  Are you claiming that there are actual objective criteria for who looks Nordic?—  (talk)