" 2005 (UTC)

I prefer ""Thomas Babington Macaulay"", and strongly disagree with the current title (""..., 1st Baron Macaulay""). First of all, ""1st"" is a barbarism. Second, the repetition of ""Macaulay"" does nothing for the article title; we can find out his peerage title by reading the article itself. He may be called ""Lord Macaulay"", and in that case there should be a redirect at Lord Macaulay, but I assure you that Macaulay is never referred to these days as ""Thomas Babington Macaulay, 1st Baron Macaulay"". I've just put in a request for Horatio Nelson, 1st Viscount Nelson to get the same treatment. (Cf. Walter Scott and Arthur Sullivan, where Wikipedia doesn't even mention the ""Sir"" in their titles.) But I see that Alfred, Lord Tennyson gets the same treatment, so maybe I'm too late.  15:30, 20 May"