Both introductions are too long, and both are biased.  They read very badly as there are far too many (and unecessary) citations and POV issues.  Rather than it reading as an encylopedic entry, it seems like a desperate attempt at justification.  How about a simple 10-line intro with some bare facts about who created it, a brief list of tenets, and how many followers/celeb followers. On the subject of controversy, all that needs to be said is that it has attracted plenty; from countries, courts and jounnalists.  BUT, list them later on.