On talk user:jim Bell, you said:

Re, your message, Gogo is not responding because he isn't at his computer. He isn't a robot that's on 24/7/365. Your rudeness and impatience seems to know no bounds. Note that I saw you call another admin a vandal before because you disagreed with their actions. Note that such is expressly forbidden, so I would advise against doing so again.— Dædαlus Contribs 

Are you going to give me an apology?  When you wrote that comment (January 3), you suggested that I was being 'impatient'.  But it's now 13 days LATER.  Dodo is being rather scarce, even today.   Your excuse, that Dodo didn't answer because he 'isn't at his computer' is wearing pretty thin, nearly two weeks later.  It looks to me that I was correct:  At the time, Dodo was not responding, but that was NOT because he 'isn't at his computer'.  Rather, he was not responding, because he had been caught doing 'drive-by edits'.   Dodo 'ran away', and he let his minions cover his ass while he ran.  At the time (January 3), you got away with claiming that I was being 'impatient', because it was at least plausible that Dodo wasn't at his computer.  But the validity of such an excuse hasn't stood the test of time.
It's really quite simple:  Wikipedia obviously attracts 'control freaks', 'info-Nazi's', etc.  Such people insinuate themselves into a position of control, as 'Administrators' if possible.  There, they abuse their positions.  Dodo needs to resign, and let some other person do that job.  And you need to stop defending him.