"
I *did* document that Peiser's results had appeared in a reliable source.  That source (the WSJ) was removed by another editor.  As for this silliness about ""Peiser admitting his mistake"", that is a deeply dishonest portrayal and you know it.  In the very same letter, he *affirmed* that his conclusions were entirely correct; the 'error' in no way affected either his results or his beliefs about them.   "