Thanks 

A short note of thanks for the explanation (the first cogent one I've seen) and statesman like manner of handling these issues. Your concern for wiki comes through and having allowed a little time to pass and having reread your note a few times I realise my support for the underlying concept of wiki is undiminished. There seems to be no concern about uploaded images and I'll take that advice about links and propose them on the article discussion page (maybe those that are externally approved as educational resources would be appropriate suggestions) and leave it the wiki community to take it from there. Not sure how future reviewers recognise that links have been added legitimately in this way eg the Brookwood Cemetery link which has been through this process and removed again and reinstated again! But maybe a step at a time. Thanks