"== Deleted Pseudoscience Page Comes Back to Life ==

A Wiki page entitled CrossFire Fusor, that was deleted in October 2010, as a result of this AfD debate:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/CrossFire_Fusor

now appears to have come back to life, in a new page here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CrossFire_Fusor

As discussed in the AfD, the above page appears to be pseudoscientific nonsense, strung together by a 42 year old guy named Moacir L. Ferreira, from Curitiba, Brazil, who has a degree in computational science, and clearly a very active sci-fi imagination.

Another apparent bit of pseudoscience by Moacir L. Ferreira implanted on Wikipedia can be found here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phase_Displacement_Space_Drive

These pages should be nominated for deletion. 

Clearly there is an intent to populate Wikipedia with his self-published pseudoscience.

  
. However, Phase_Displacement_Space_Drive will have to go to WP:AFD.   

 Message to 50.99.244.233 wrt Kunjaliyan 

The article was not deleted. It was moved to the article incubator as a result of this discussion because the film has not yet been released. If I had not done this then the article most likely would have been deleted. The article is at Wikipedia:Article Incubator/Kunjaliyan. You are welcome to work on it there and when the film is released and/or it gets more coverage then it can be moved back into article space.   

 User:Amyabaker/Noddle 
 I received this message. But, as you fully protected page   

Anthony, you were involved at User talk:Amyabaker/Noddle. I think the full protection in this situation is uncontroversial enough that you can unprotect it yourself. I will have to log off soon, and I'd like to post the changes now instead of later.   
   
Thank you! I have updated the draft with my changes.   

I'll trust Anthony's judgement on this matter but normally it's reasonable to protect pages that are temporarily restored for DRV.   
I understand that pages restored for DRV are generally protected. However, because this was a speedy deletion, and because I had addressed the speedy deletion reason with a rewrite, I think it was a good application of unprotection.   

 An AFD you closed was restarted two days later 

You closed Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World of Books Ltd as No consensus, and Phearson, who said delete in that debate, two days after your close opened a new AFD at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World of Books Ltd (2nd nomination).  Can you speedy close this and warn him of the rules?  
While I didn't say ""with leave to speedy renominate"", there wasn't a lot of participation in the first AFD so let's let this one run its course. What would help is if you or another one of the ""keep"" !voters could find another supersource or 2 to compliment the