" 2015 (UTC)

 First a suggestion for Sarah Welsh, if you are ""struggling"", and that too with the very first words of the article , just hold off rather than going ahead and still editing the article (and making it, as you did in this case, almost impossible for anyone to comprehend). This is not someone's personal blog, but a page with more than 2000 daily views. So please act with discretion.

 Second, your allegation that my edits ""distorted and misrepresented the sources such as Nesbitt's OUP book"" is a complete LIE. I did not even bring in the Nesbitt book. So, again, as has been found out on many prior occasions, don't mislead people and please show some civility. Rather, it is you who removed reliably sourced content that did not comply with your own biased views, while you were on your massive blind spree to undo all my edits. For instance, I had quoted directly from Mansukhani, Introduction to Sikhism, that I had referenced when mentioning word of God ""The Granth presides over all congregations and represents the word of God in permanent form"", which you blindly removed.

 Coming now to the sentence in the first paragraph on the key beliefs, I had made an edit a few days ago. You again made modifications to them. I suggest you actually go and read the sources well. In any case, I have added another source, and all the beliefs I have included are now present in the three cited sources. Now of course, to make complete sentences and for improved readability, I have to add some of my own words. (e.g., key beliefs are ""engaging in"" selfless service, ""striving for"" social justice; rather than selfless service, social justice.) I urge you to exercise extreme restraint and caution from here on, rather than engaging in uncivilized behavior and/or edit-warring.   07:22, 10 October"