"
I still concur with Bilcat.  I think there are fundemental differences between the terms ""Military occupation"" and ""Occupied Territories"" that justify seperate articles.  For instance, thinking of Irag and/or Afghanistan; They are under ""military occupation"", but couldn't really accurately be called ""occupied territories"".  If you think a distinction like this one is valid, than it follows that there should be seperate articles.   "