"

 Requests for comment 

 RFC/discussion of article Global warming controversy 
Hello, . As a prominent contributor to Global warming controversy, you may want to be aware that a request for comments has been filed about it. The RFC can be found by the article's name in this list, and the actual discussion can be found on Talk:Global warming controversy, in case you wish to participate. Thank you for your contributions.      
Controversy or not
Reading the article about the existence of a ""controversy"" seems that there is not any controversy at all and instead the few not supporting human-causation in rising temperatures are outliers.

If this is the case the article seems to be unnecessary entirely.  If it is not the case then the article's balance is not to Wikipedia's standards.

Dual philosophies used in enforcement of policies, guidelines and content.
Questions seem to persists relating to the validity of sources.  On one hand sources that are not in agreement with the ""global warming conseneus"" viewpoint are removed with the related text.  On the other hand sources that are in agreement with the ""global warming consensus"" viewpoint are replaced.

Questions persists relating to the Wikipedia standards for handling edits.
When edits are made that are about one side of the Global Warming Controversy they are deleted or reverted with little, if any explanation.  When edits are made about the other side of the Global Warming Controversy there are attempts to ""make them better"" instead of deletions. "