Jim

I am new to Wikipedia but seek to make sure the informamtion is correct.  According to BPL (SIC?) rules any information that is unsourced or of a dubious source is to be removed.  In the article Jung Myong Seok I take issue with citations 11, 12, and  13.

11 Is attributed to a French sociologist Ms Nathalie Luca.  Problem is the citiation page does not support the claim that JMS was a member of the Unification Church. Additionally there is an out of place British flag on the top of the citation page which does not fit CNRS country of orgin- France. Therefore,  I do not only doubt the authenticity of the citation but it does nothing to support the claim made in the body of the article.

12 Citation leads to a link titled Radio Australia with 5 poorly written sentences that describe a supposed historical timeline.  The article has no reference to primary sources AND does not even have a listed author.  It gives me the impression that someone robbed a page from Radio Australia and wrote whatever suited their needs. Furthermore, the information contradicts what was written in paragraph 3 of the JMS article.  Mr Jung was not fleeing justice but was carrying out missionary trips.  The sentence associated with this citation clearly portrays Mr Jung as a criminal on the run.   This is a shameful act of intellectual dishonesty and it is travesty to leave this libelous information posted with an inadequate citation.

13  The citation link is no longer available and can not be used to verify the statement in the body of the article. What accusations reached other countries and why was he investigated by Taiwanese authorities?  The answer is not stated in the wikipedia article but the implication is that he committed sexual assault or some similar crime in other countries.  These 3 sentences( associated with citation 12 and 13) flow with the clear intent to slander Mr Jung without 1 single  properly referenced source. 

Please remove this slander and libel from Wikipedia that the truth may be known.

Kindly respond to my email the way you did the first time if possible as I do not want to miss your response.
Much obliged.