>Everything that is on Wikipedia article space has to be by consensus/policy.Dully noted>The hadith that you tried to remove is about a slave that was freed.No, the hadith I removed was about a wife that didn't give her uncle a gift in which Muhammad told her you can, it has no basis on manumission of slaves or not, Muhammad alredy encouraged manumission with the evidence I brought forth.>We have a consensus to retain that and to keep the section title neutral.I agree but saying manumission makes no sense, it is either encouraged or discouraged.>There's no reason to have any further discussion on any of this since the consensus is clear.I have yet to see a reason a VALID one why giving gifts to your uncle is constituted as manumission???
>You can continue to talk here all you want but I don't think anyone is going to reply further because it's just repetitious at this point, and that wastes everyone's time.It's waste everyone who doesn't know the hadith, this is simply a herd mentality, and as I have told you before the people who started the edit warring were people stalking me and following me. There is no way Wikipedia can't have tyranny of the majority, would a 1+1=3 need a consensus? Surely there can exist a consensus from editors who have knowledge in this area and not people who have a dog against me like Jeppiz and Tip.