":::The places that deserve venting about cultural bias in Wikipedia are the places where that bias is found. Maybe admins should find a less idiotic way to respond to venting than threats of banning and accusation of trolling. Maybe, for example, it ought to pop into your head that the venting originates with a grievance that deserves to be taken seriously. I think there are racist admins on Wikipedia who use their position to push an agenda regarding Israel/Palestine, and our mechanisms of admin accountability are inadequate. I think there is cultural bias affecting our treatment of these topics, and our principles to monitor cultural bias are empty promises (i.e., bullshit). I think there is no chance in Hell that a study of our reliability of any number of political issues would match the widely cited study on our reliability that looked only at technical articles. Our coverage of politicized, controversial topics is worthless, POV-polluted crap and everybody knows it.  Maybe you should also refrain from bringing your opinion about a content dispute into your threats. The ""pedantic arguments"" to which you refer concern some text that currently exists in the article, and which version deserves to prevail. My arguments aren't pedantic to me, and threatening me for making them is exactly the sort admin powertrip admins are sick of me complaining about. Threatening people is disruptive.    

"