"
Heh. I don't really care. I've made some good contributions to wiki. I fixed the unfixable ""unsolved problems in philosophy"" article, the bio for the poet Howard Nemerov, and little fixes to philosophy and math articles. Meanwhile, this clown goes around censoring any negative information about Topalov, regardless of how factually accurate, and I get banned for calling him an idiot? If they want to ban me, then so be it. Let them ban me for life for all I care. I'm happy to mock their ""decision"" and the inarticulate schlepp that is Dionyseus. This is the author of the ""pseudo-penis"" article, who's constantly embroiled in arbitration on some topic or another. The guy whose chief contribution to Wikipedia has been individual entries for every character in ""Dune"". If they'd rather have Dionyseus's intellectual contributions than mine, then I'd welcome the ban. I have to say, their ""civility"" rules show that they're more interested in having a hippy love-fest than actually getting facts straight. The chief ingredient to intellectual honesty, in my humble opinion, is a willingness to spot phonies and imbeciles for what they are. The guy can't even spell [Dionysus] properly, and he's going around editing encyclopedia articles. Pish.  "