"
This logic is convoluted and general nonsense. The arbitration decision involved a disagreement about content in the Khojaly tragedy article. It did not involve a statement I had not yet made, during the non-actionable enforcement request. Therefore I did not violate the arbitration decision. The wording on my talk page clearly states that I violated the arbitration decision where you said the following: ""To enforce an arbitration decision"". You were not enforcing anything via the block, but rather making a unilateral decision to disregard evidence I pointed to and block me for accusatory language. I hope that makes my concern clearer.  "