":: , I am not going to make this a personal dispute, or continue to argue.  If you feel Hanson's work is inappropriate, ask for a peer review.  This not the time or place to hold a dissertation or discussion on introduction into proper academic conduct.   I would advise you to read Norman J. Wilson's work, ""History in Crisis? Recent Directions in Historiography"" and then we could discuss this.  If you feel that (cf. WP:RS#Beware_false_authority has been abused by the use of Hanson's work in this article, again, bring it to Kirill in the Military Group, or ask for a peer review.  I don't find bad scholarship amusing - what I find sadly amusing is that you persist in attacking me personally rather than simply proposing edits with more appropriate authors or more relevant historians if you feel such are needed.   I am trying my best to work on the article, and not indulge in personal disagreements or arguments over whether your degree trumps my degree.  I don't believe that bad scholarship has taken place here.  If you do, please bring it to Kirill - or more to the point, propose a rewrite with better sources!  While the rest of us are honestly trying to rewrite and improve, I don't see anything from you but personal attacks.  I won't go that route.  Again, please read J. Wilson's work, and we can talk somewhere else about trends in Historiography.  This space is for those who wish to work on this article.  If you feel you have better sources, my goodness, use them to simply write a suggested rewrite for the section of the article we are working on, post it here, and let everyone discuss it, as I did with my suggestions.    

"