"==Ugly Personal Attacks - You Approve??==

'''Good Morning, Philippe.  The post above yours, by LoverofArt, is typical of his posts in my direction.  An ugly personal attack, by a person who has in essence defamed a widely respected organization  the National Civilian Community Corps  by posting false and misleading information at the Wikipedia website.

If your / Wikipedia's best idea is that what should happen next is that I enter into a prolonged dialogue with that person, hoping to reason with him/her, while he/she continues to exert control over content and issue ugly diatribes, then your processes leave a great deal to be desired.  A responsible adult  a real Editor  should have interceded long ago.  He/she and the others working over the NCCC text at this time seem to feel that any statement introduced by the phrase ""According to ___,"" does not belong at Wikipedia.  As I read it, there was objection at one of your pages to placing references at the end of that phrase rather than at the end of the quotation.  Why an encyclopedia would have as a policy including bald claims (as if fact) without reference to the source in its text eludes me.  It would give the impression that the encyclopedia had evaluated the statement, which is obviously not the case. 

I appreciate Wikipedia's effort to provide freely accessible information to the public.  I am not impressed, however, by the response to gross errors made at the Wikipedia site.  Your crew is attacking the messenger at least in part because it is the message that it does not like.

A pretty sorry performance, which you seem to be joining by failing to address the issues I raise or the attacks on me.

Pull LoverofArt out of this situation and I will join in a dispute resolution process regarding editing the NCCC site.  I refuse to have further dealings with him/her. 

"