"
Michael, with all due respect, it's over. It may be that you can do math better than me, but it's not the math that's the problem, it's statements like ""I don't know a whole lot about this case, but I tend to think that race may well be relevant here"" and ""My first instinct is it likely should be included as the news accounts likely included the information. But did they or was this simply not an issue?"". I assume you are ""counting"" those as ""in favour of inclusion""really, one can't. They are not unequivocal inclusion votes and raise more questions than they answer. Moreover, I assume you're including comments like ""I agree that race should be included as long as it does not violate WP:UNDUE."" That's finebut this participant did not address how the inclusion does not violate UNDUE, and since this (as John points out) is not a vote, such a statement can't have the full weight as is carried by the more complete answers of John and Beyond My Ken.   "