"
Also, , I don't think anyone is arguing that concision improves the title.  Concision is useful when two titles are approximately equally ""good"".  That is, criteria other than concision do not favor either.  That is the case here.  In such cases concision is useful for one and only one reason: it settles a controversy in which either choice is more than acceptable once and for all.  That is, once this title is moved to HC, there will be no more controversy, for there will be no strong argument whatsoever to move it to HRC.  That is a good reason to move it accordingly.  2C "