":::I know you are trying to be helpful, John, but you seem a little confused about the issues here. I have not asked Tyrenius to prove anything. he/she has asked me to use a particularly tortuous pronoun combination and I will endeavour to do this. If I ever slip up it will not be because I have misused editing privilege ""to fulfil a personal campaign"". I am a specific male with a specific identity that I have proved to administrators. I am human. I am male. I make mistakes. I try and recognise when I make mistakes and then do what I was brought up to do naturally to defuse a difficult situation that I cause by my mistakes. Admission and apology.
I do not know or care why he/she is so sensitive on this pronoun issue and I certainly can not comprehend why he/she should be posting on my talk page at this difficult time. I have asked her/him to go away and have a good think about her/his unhelpful attitude to sock puppet allegations and her/his admin decisions in general and I hope he/she does. I still have not had a copy of the e-mail he/she constantly refers to and neither have I had any e-mail from her/him at any time whatsoever.
He/she really is being logically inconsistent and, speaking plainly, should now either put up or shut up.
Wikipedia is just too Byzantine.
It seems to have a ""sanction system"" where only two verdicts are possible regarding ""sockpuppetry"": Guilty or Probably Guilty (""checkuser is not for fishing""). I would have preferred to reach an exculpatory verdict, but accept that the present administration can not adequately address common sense issues of justice and fairness.
So be it.
At least Alison and Gadfium know the truth ''' ✉  

"