"

Do you honestly believe that blocking my edits from this account means that I won't find a way to circumvent such flimsy controls? Perhaps I shouldn't have stated that ""wikipedia has no controls whatsoever"", it certainly does- those controls are a means to assert a point of view and purport to publish it under the guise of objectivity by censoring dissent through subversive means. Your site is a joke, and your belief that censoring people through the use of a skewed moderation mechanism is an effective means of preserving the pretense of objectivity is completely ignorant of the resourcefulness of a dedicated mind.

Perhaps you should take a look at Roland Rance and the rest of his self-identified Marxist cronies as they domineer their pet articles before you attack people for asserting a point of view. Maybe then your misguided notions of 'putting people in their place' would have some justifiable notions behind them. But I think the more likely outcome is that you'll continue preserving viewpoints you find agreeable under the pretense of a dedication to objectivity and education. Carry on propagandizing, regardless of my behaviour you will still have trash opinion articles on a site that aims to compete with reputed publications like Britannica. At least there education is valued."