"

 User Ted Frank / THF has posted the folloing on my talk page rather than here where it is relevant, so I duplicate it here:

[edit] July 2007
 Welcome to Wikipedia! I am glad to see you are interested in discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:Tort reform in the United States are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic. Please refrain from doing this in the future. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. THF 

 Please stop. If you continue to use talk pages such as Tort reform in the United States for inappropriate discussion, as described here, you may be blocked. THF 

 Please do not attack other editors, which you did here: Talk:Tort reform in the United States. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. THF 

Retrieved from ""http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:RUReady2Testify""

 I dispute both the method and the substance of THF/Ted Frank's assertions. He asserts that my post on the tort reform article is not related to the tort reform article. It clearly is, and no argument is needed for that, just read it. He asserts that my discussion is ""inappropriate""a loaded word that usually refers to ""offensive or even actionable language"" none of which appear in my post, but he does not explain what is ""inappropriate"" about my post, he unilatery deletes it, despite knowing that the neutrality of the article is disputed and despite the obvious relation of my post to the issue of neutrality and how it can be achieved in this particular article on tort reform. 

THF Ted Frank accuses me of ""attacking"" other editors and declares that I will be blocked. Inasmuch as I have never attacked any other editors, this assertion is not true, and is itself an attack and a threat. I am asking for a discussion on a flagged subject on this articleneutrality and how it can be achieved. To thwart that discussion is to subvert neutrality.  

"