"

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/HistoryBuffEr and Jayjg/Evidence
Due to its disorganization and unmanageable length, I have moved the material from the evidence page, 495 kb, to a new location and set up a new page. Please summarize your evidence at the new page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/HistoryBuffEr and Jayjg/Evidence, putting your evidence in a separate section, following the date and time format and limiting your presentation to no more than 1000 words and 100 diffs.  13:17, Dec 13, 2004 (UTC)
Will reply on the Evidence talk page.  19:21, 2004 Dec 13 (UTC)

 Something you noted 

I note that you remarked on the manner in which certain cases were quickly ignored, but others taken up with relish. So, I pose the question,

If an active arbitrator admitted that they are a right wing POV warrier who has, in real life, even acted in such a way as to have been suspended from practicing law, are they fit to continue in their post and meet out judgements on others.

Wikipedia:Current surveys/FrBaArbQuality 

 01:29, 2004 Dec 18 (omitted sig added)

 Request for Arbitration 

Following the various tos-and-fros on WP:VIP, I have made a request for arbitration. You are one of a handful of users in the ""Various"" request.  21:50, 23 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Request withdrawn; turns out that the user accused of being a sockpuppet has been blocked, therefore resolving the issue.  22:04, 23 Dec 2004 (UTC)"