First of all, who the fuck died and made you the god on what is and what is not plagiarism? It seems like a pretty clear cut case to me. If text from the article matches text found in another source word for word, then it seems fairly clear cut that it is plagiarized. I would also point out, again, for like the umpteenth fucking time, that this user has been using plagiarized material repeatedly and only takes it out after being beaten over the head with it. Secondly, don’t you fucking dare try and threaten me with what might and might not be said in arbitration. Finally, in case you were not aware or just did not care, an AOL IP cannot be blocked, so that is not any threat for the anon.  23:12, Feb 10, 2005 (UTC)