BadVista.org criticisms (moved from my personal talk page) 

Please refrain from adding BadVista.org links or criticisms. This situation has played out a long time back. See the discussion archives for Windows Vista articles. Most claims there are exaggerated and are not substantiated beyond a point. Heck, many have even been downright refuted. Its plain and simple yellow journalism. By consensus, it is not considered a source reliable enough to be quoted in the article. Plus, nothing is there that has not already been covered. Repeating them again is not neutral. Please respect policy, otherwise, I am sorry to say this, it will lead you to being blocked from editing here.  talk 

Who are you to say which source is reliable? Your act of filtering statements based on your own liking is against WP:NPOV. Also it appears Wikipedian likes to threaten a member as a way to welcome someone who tries to contribute. Perhaps you have an interest in Microsoft business. Bye!  

Engage in discussion first, before making unilateral changes to the article.  talk 

There is no rule in Wikipedia to say we have to discuss first before we can edit the article. Wikipedia says Be bold when editing the page. Yours is against this rule. Besides I find that you also remove changes or do changes without discussing first. This is a double standard. I found no official source in Wikipeida which says BadVista.org has been officially blacklisted or flagged as bad source. Judging on your own liking is against WP:NPOV.  

I'm going to move this part of discussion on the right page.