"
I'm not exactly a ""pro-Israeali (sic) Wikipedian"" (unless by pro-Israeli one means believing that Israel has a right to exist), but in general I would be very sparing the use of the words ""terrorism"" and ""terrorist"". It's one thing to say ""A calls B a terrorist""  that's OK  but I can't think of a case where I would want to use it in the narrative voice of the article. In the case of the Munich Massacre, I wouldn't bother fighting to remove the word, nor (to cite an example where the perpetrators were Zionists) would I in the case of the Deir Yassin massacre. Given that we cite the UN calling the Sabra and Shatila Massacre genocidal  a much stronger term than terrorist  it's hard to imagine what would be gained by adding that word. After all, if we call the SS ""paramilitary"", it seems reasonable to use the same word for the Phalangists.   | Talk 00:33, Nov 17, 2004 (UTC)"