READ THIS: YOU HAVE FAILED TO PROVIDE A SINGLE LOGICAL REASON AGAINST THE SAID WAY OF RECOGNIZING THIS PERSON.  EVERY SINGLE SOURCE NOTES HIM AS THE GREATEST.  WHAT IS YOUR REASONING CONTRARY TO THAT?  DO YOU INSIST OF HAVING IT SUCH A WAY JUST SO YOU CAN HAVE A STAR NEXT TO AN ARTICLE??  THAT MAKES THE WHOLE INTEGRITY OF WIKIPEDIA MOOT.