"
It's not a threat, it's a warning (because we're all happier when editors voluntarily stop disrupting the encyclopaedia).  Adding invalid speedy deletion tags to articles is not adhering to policy or guideline.  Placing invalid warning template on user talk pages is not adhering to guidelines and policies.  Redirecting pages from the mainspace to other namespaces is not adhering to policies and guidelines.  All of these things are unacceptable disruption.  If you want it moved back to draft space, start a discussion on the talk and get a consensus.  The article appears to meet WP:N and looks in decent shape, so there's compelling reason to unilaterally move it to draft.  That you don't want other editors editing is, frankly, tough, see WP:OWN.  A history merge is necessary to meet the licensing conditions, so there's nothing to discuss on that issue.  The licensing isn't negotiable.  D "