"

It was good to have found the evidence concerning Qijong. However, it is excessive to include two paragraphs on something like Qijong. References (for example [17]) are appropriate. That is what is done throughout the rest of the article when providing evidence, but with Qijong has not been done. 

Jfdwolff asked ""Please propose further significant changes here on the talkpage"" yet has just made changes without adhereing to his own request. That is solely the reason for the recent revert. Rules and customs should apply equally to everyone. 

Due to the investigation that has been initiated, you will soon be finding out from Administrators that you are breaching the very rules you claim should be adhered to. Besides risking sanctions yourself, it will not look good if you intend to apply to be an Administrator again.  "