Atheism 

My main concern is that the article spends too much time discussing what it isn't, primarily in relation to christianity, and not what it IS.  In a large number of cases, the first line of reasoning concerns itself with what's been said about it (usually negative), and then a rebuttal.

I will agree that in general the article is much better than it has been previously, but like most discussions of atheism I feel it argues from the wrong perspective.