The court cases need to go: OR 

In most cases in this article the lawsuits filed against MonaVie are used as sources of information about the company. However, the relevancy of lawsuits, even when they are through and the court has published an opinion, requires interpretation by another party prior to their being used as a reliable, secondary or tertiary source in an encyclopedia article.

When editors say that the company is controversial and add multiple lawsuits filed against the company as direct support of the controversy the editors are providing their original research and opinion about the company. Wikipedia has a policy of No original research, and all of these lawsuits must be removed and the underlying statements that are supported solely by the lawsuits must be removed.

If another article discusses the lawsuit, a reliable secondary or tertiary source, for example, then the lawsuits can be included to support statements derived from the secondary or tertiary source. An example of this would be a full quote from the court case that is referenced in the reliable source.

I will, of course, listen to community input on this. However, I plan to remove all of the lawsuits that do not meet the requirements for proper referencing of a wikipedia article.