RIR, it seems obvious you don't like the presence of Usana corp reps by your attempts to discredit them immediately upon arrival by asking Jean314 for proof of vandalism/sock puppetry, but none of the 4 behaviors in the inappropriate notification policy apply to this request for insiders:
Spamming: Posting an excessive number of messages to individual users, or to users with no significant connection to the topic at hand.
Campaigning: Posting a notification of discussion that presents the topic in a non-neutral manner.
Vote-stacking: Posting messages to users selected based on their known opinions (which may be made known by a userbox, user category, or prior statement). Vote-banking involves recruiting editors perceived as having a common viewpoint for a group, similar to a political party, in the expectation that notifying the group of any discussion related to that viewpoint will result in a numerical advantage, much as a form of prearranged vote stacking.
Stealth canvassing: Contacting users off-wiki (by e-mail, for example) to persuade them to join in discussions (unless there is a specific reason not to use talk pages)
Soliciting support other than by posting direct messages, such as using a custom signature with a message promoting a specific position on any issue being discussed.

Neither of the 2 corp accounts have any say in controversial discussions, and I would prefer they don't even comment on those.  My original request was to have them point out inaccuracies in the article of which they have sourced proof is wrong.  Items we have no idea they are incorrect unless someone pointed them out.  I gave appropriate notification in my RfC (of which noone was yet responded) about the controversial issues we are discussing.