"

On August 12 an IP from EUMETSAT changed some of the capitalization followed immediately by  (same person?).  Does this make it authoritive?  It certainly seems that EUMETSAT have their own convension, but many others uses the capitalization as originally provided in this article, such as this one  from the UK's Met Office and  from Space Flight Now and  from RMETS.ORG and this one of the owners  and of course the ESA links.  However, this article  from the Guardian and this  from the BBC follow EUMETSAT's convension. Also, the Met Office can't make up their minds as with this article . EUMETSAT might be the operators but are they the authority in the naming convention used? Anyway, if there are no objections after a suitable period to give time for other editors to review this I see no reason not to make the change.   Chat  "