"

 Okay, now I'm intrigued: Why do you even bother ""contributing"" to the article if you don't even bother watching the briefings ? Really, what's your motivation here ? Just try to explain it - I simply cannot understand it. Just to provide another perspective: I came here to help with things, because I actually have something to contribute, beyond ""reviewing/editing and reverting"" stuff. And now the whole experience has been incredibly negative, I have talked to ATPL-holders and they said they won't bother helping on wp, and all of a sudden it's making sense. How do you guys expect wikipedia to provide a certain degree of quality by having such ""procedures"" in place, where power is determined by seniority, ability to use proper wp markup and admin privileges, rather than knowledge ??  "