"As I have said: if scholars' (ie: commentators, and obviously not primary sources) say that ""Boia is wrong because..."", cite them'; if other scholars, without entering a dialog with Boia draw different conclusions based on the same primary sources, cite them. What you have added there is basically: ""But I, Daizus, could just as well say say that Boia is wrong based on my love for reading or whatever"". That perspective is unencycopedic and contrary to wikipedia norms. "