What I've seen happen before is that anonymous edits are treated like shit, regardless of what they are actually doing, and that anyone with a username is automatically assumed to be OK.  You saw that I made edits that were reverted by someone with a username.  Presumably you didn't bother to look into the merits of the edits, you just assumed that the username was right to revert them.  And so you attacked me for being angry, not the username for reverting sensible edits.  I think you should be able to see that it's unreasonable to expect good faith from me in return for that.