":::: But Petrarchan47, that's one of the problems. ) AlterNet is not a legitimate reference for determining any scientific issue any more than Fox ""News"" is. AlterNet is highly biased, catering to a progressive political position which, I would agree, cleaves strongly to scientific principles yet is biased nonetheless. That article you reference fails on any number of fatal logic fallacies, not the least of which is the begging the question claim that there were ""millions"" in the protest, nor the begging the question supposition that the movement is ""gaining steam.""
 Immersion in to the scientific literature is what the other Editors suggested is the most reasonable avenue of contention resolution on this article, not diving in to highly biased blogish web sites that cater to particular political and social world views. No offense intended, please understand. ) I appeal to science and the Scientific Method which AlterNet just aint no part of. 
 The whole article here is badly un-encyclopedic. The article is strewn with unsupported suppositions. It totally fails to meet even rudimentary High School level reporting of the event leave alone reach what I would consider to be good encyclopedia work.   

"