"""It does not seem that the subject of this article would not merit such consideration.""  So, in this double negative sentence, you are saying you agree with Shearonink, and myself, that is does warrant such consideration.  That seems out of character for you.  Regardless, what you don't seem to be able to understand is you are stating an opinion!  Your opinion of Yank Barry is irrelevant to this article.  So is mine.  The question is, does Shearonink's proposal hold water.  I believe it does merit such consideration.  It is well documented, we've covered secondary sources in articles as being 100% okay, the nominators are well respected public figures, and if it there are circumstances where it is allowed, then, in my OPINION, this is one of those circumstances.  Don't even start with your UNDUE nonsense.  It is certainly due, that is not even the question on the table.  The bottom line is the editor was proposing one factual sentence, I believe, and I agree.  I am for telling an accurate, factual story.  Not screaming undue at everything and keeping information out of articles.  Accurate.  Factual.  Encyclopedia.  

"