<https://repolitics.com/forums/topic/41418-lytton-on-fire/page/4/#comment-1449548>
<http://schema.org/text>
"Your accusation of deflection is deflection. \n \n\n\n\tMy point remains. Any suggestion the Lytton fire had anything to do with what some call \"climate change,\" meaning climate armageddon as a result of fossil fuel use is ridiculous.\n \n\n\n\tIf you want to pout because you can't show me why I'm wrong about this, off you go then. Go pout in your corner.\n \n\n\n\tChew on this while you're there. The IPCC is claiming a climate sensitivity of 2 degrees per doubling of CO2. That would be the parameter of what you and yours like to call \"climate change.\"\n \n\n\n\tThe recent heat record Lytton set is 8 degrees above what it was when Lytton set the previous record in 1941. Where did the extra 6 degrees come from if it was, as you would like to believe, \"climate change?\"\n \n"
<https://repolitics.com/forums/topic/41418-lytton-on-fire/page/4/>