<https://repolitics.com/forums/topic/41418-lytton-on-fire/page/4/#comment-1449663>
<http://schema.org/text>
"Buddy, the IPCC is what's supposed to be science. If you're calling what they say an opinion then what are you calling \"science?\"\n \n\n\n\tThe temperature increase in the Lytton heat record was 6 degrees higher than it would have been from CO2 alone. That's just math and data. \n \n\n\n\tYou're conclusion on dryness is opinion. It's been as dry in the past as it was in Lytton when it caught fire this time. The dryness just happened quicker this time. It was raining in BC where I am shortly before the heat wave spurt. Heat waves are weather not climate. Labeling convenient ones climate or attributing them to climate is opinion. If you're calling it science, it's \"science.\"\n \n\n\n\tWhy didn't Lillooet burn 35 miles to the south? The last time Lytton set the Canadian heat record Lillooet shared it.\n \n\n\n\tThey still have no cause for the fire. They just know it happened inside the city and was not a spark from a forest fire.\n \n"
<https://repolitics.com/forums/topic/41418-lytton-on-fire/page/4/>