<https://educationforum.ipbhost.com/topic/2814-dealey-plaza-map/#comment-18225>
<http://schema.org/text>
"Hello Shanet. \n\nI agree as well.  25+ operatives and screw trying to prove one additional shooter on the knoll, or any nonsense about the dictabelt.  In 2005 it's 25+ or nothing.    That's my attitude.   \nI don't know so much about 'triangulated.'  Who came up with that idea anyway?  I can't post images anymore for some reason, but I liken it to the spokes on a wheel, with DCM at center.  Add Cameramen and Signalmen to your mix, plus security. \nI have an interesting aerial view map which I have composed, attempting to identify [most] of the radios, as they are evidenced in various films and photos.  It isn't up to date, because I am always finding more.  I have never assembled all the cameras I have found in one place.  Also, sad to say, I have no way of knowing if some of what I believe to be cameras are not in fact specific hi-tech scopes used by spotters, or rifle scopes in some cases. \nI have a similar map in which I have plugged in the shooters, using a lot of photographic analyses and examining trajectories, but it's imperfect, as I am unable to zero in on several of the exact locations. \nLenses, IMO, can be identified due to the phenomenon that occurs when they are captured by the lens of another camera.  They have a shimmering type of brilliance about them, as they somehow refract the light.  Not a subject matter expert on photography, or why this occurs, just an observation. \n\nThe car is of no consequence, IMO.  It is a bogus addition.  Have you been to DP?  This object would have to be between the fence and the retaining wall.  Impossible.  It also fails to appear in Moorman.  Even if it was a car behind the fence, it would have had to have been higher than ~7' tall IMO.  The fence is 5' high, and Nix is located at a much lower elevation. \nJust another red herring, like the phony Oswald photo at the embassy submitted by David Atlee Phillips.  Garrison thought it was suspect, and that makes perfect sense, given Phillips role and his past expertise in propaganda and disinformation. \nAnother is the 3rd man on the stairs.  Another is Rosemary Willis' hood, which is seen in it's normal position on her coat in Dorman, not tightly drawn around her head, as seen in Zapruder.   \nIf you peel back the overexposure and tinting in Nix, you can see the party up there.  There are anywhere from 7 - 12 people or more, on the stairs, behind the retaining wall, and behind the fence, in that area - this per extensive computer enhancement work I have done on the films and photos. \nI may not have quoted this here, so I will do it again. \n\n\nI strongly do NOT agree with that.  He was hit in the throat.  The throat doesn't rotate much when the head is turned, but from everything I have seen, Kennedy was facing his right.     \nTake out the Warren Report.  Examine the exhibit of the windshield.  Now look at Altgens and examine the windshield.  The 'spiral shaped hole' is in the background.  It is a combination of what appears to be a small black child's hair, and a pleat or something in the woman's dress standing next to her.  This same hole, IMO, cannot be confused with the area of brightness found in Zapruder [frame #?].  However, if you look at Altgens, there is evidence of perhaps 2 bulletholes.  One is lower, and if you draw a line from the underpass curb area at Main, where Tague was hit, and take that back to the DalTex window, you have a perfect trajectory for a shot that narrowly missed Kennedy's head, penetrated the windshield from the rear, and went on it course, unjacketed perhaps, to strike the curb and wound Tague.  Perhaps the FBI report issued concerning the lead was the only true piece of evidence that ever emerged in the case. \nNow examine the exhibit, ce350, and compare it to the location of what appear to be genuine bulletholes.  I say this because I devoted many hours to working on the windshield.  Not a photogrammetry expert, I apply simple logic.  If I focus on the rearview mirror, and do my best to enhance it and pull it forward, then the next closest object would be the windshield, which should stand out in relief.  It does, and the classic 'spiral hole' fades into the background.  But the bulletholes do not. \nIn a high quality, early version of the Altgens photo, it's difficult to even see where this spiral shaped hole would have even come from in later photos.  Anyway, compare it to the Warren Exhibit.  There are 2 specific areas of tint applied to the photograph in exactly and precisely the same exact areas as I see the bulletholes in Altgens!  A highly improbably coincidence. \nNow, take the glass shards that hit Kennedy.  This could have come from a shot from the front, but not from the South Knoll.  I believe there may have been a shot from the front, but it came from closer to the Lincoln, and it failed to fully penetrate the glass.  It may have been responsible for causing the damage to the rear view mirror. \nMitch Werbells taught SIONICS.  In these training courses, shooting a target through a windshield was taught - at point blank range, and holding the weapon at a 45 degree angle to the windshield.  This was obviously to allow for more accurate penetration, and prevent any innocents from getting tagged.  Taking a shot through a windshield at what would amount to a 5 - 15 degree angle from more than a hundred yards away is insane and highly unlikely. \nNow consider the Stemmons Sign.  Was it hit?  If so, where?  If it wasn't hit, why remove it and put up a new one?  Jack White, as per his bio on Spartacus, discovered:  \n\nNow let's examine the wound.  Parkland Doctors were puzzled by what appeared to be a very small entrance wound.  The insinuation, or course, was that the jacket was discarded when it smashed it's way through the windshield.  How about hitting the top edge of the sign instead?  If you watch the Zapruder film, and you consider a Retaining wall shot, the shooter would have had to have taken the shot moments before his target would have passed out of view behind the Stemmons sign. \nGroden believes that the throat shot had to have come from the knoll, due to his close examination of the Z-film.  He says Kennedy is turned too far to his right to have allowed for a wound like that to have come from anywhere but the Knoll area. \nNow examine the Zapruder film again.  Kennedy appears to be reacting from the shot to the throat in roughly z197, correct?  Take a look at the side panels.  In the ghost images, 195 - z208, say, there appears what looks to be a rifle.  These images are captured by the aperture, which focuses outwards in a cone.  They are not within the direct target area, as seen through the viewfinder.  The 'rifle' shaped object appears to waver, then recoil.  Note that even with the studies made on the claw, the aperture, overlapping images, etc., there is nothing that can explain the reaction of this object, as it moves forward and backward.  There is nothing within the main action area that could even be used as an argument for this object.  Within frames of the recoil, we see Kennedy reacting to the shot.  Another impossible coincidence, IMO. \nAdd that all together, plus the cop that was guarding the Underpass area at the South Knoll, and you've got a retaining wall shot for the throat shot.  I was told by a witness to the assassination [Groden's sidekick - Brown?], with some rather colorful language I might add, that this cop [whose name escapes me] was a personal friend, who was in no way associated with the conspiracy, and would have acted quickly to remove any such shooter in that vicinity.   \nAnd it's a shame that once something becomes published, everyone has to quote it as if it's an historical document with 100% accuracy and an established fact.   \nIMO. \nemail me if you'd like to see some of the supporting photographic stuff, I am unable to post images. \n- lee "
<https://educationforum.ipbhost.com/topic/2814-dealey-plaza-map/>