_:n5b31749afc964958bddfb56e2be1ea44xb0
<http://schema.org/articleBody>
"A 1902 <a href=\"https://musicbrainz.org/work/e238fe7e-f08d-42f3-b7dc-a7f55e5666ba\">song</a> gave rise to the tongue-twister, “How much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood?” “Could,” as opposed to “would,” was the appropriate word selection since the woodchuck cannot “chuck” wood. Taking editorial license with the verse and applying it to an emerging 21st century profession, the following is proffered: “How many facts could a fact-checker check if a fact-checker could check facts?” Again, “could” is appropriate since not all fact-checkers do what their title implies.\r\n\r\n<em>Article by Lt. Col. James Zumwalt from <a href=\"https://www.wndnewscenter.org/unmasking-the-fact-checkers/\">WND</a>.</em>\r\n\r\nNumerous professions have names appropriately describing occupation: ministers “minister,” bakers “bake” and teachers “teach.” Therefore, when an institution such as social media engages “fact-checkers,” we assume their job is to verify that claims made are factual.\r\n\r\nBut today, the need arises to fact-check the fact-checkers as some use the title as a journalistic smokescreen to promote personal agendas, bending facts to fit when needed. For them, fact-checking involves spin artistry – portraying a claim according to their agenda rather than to facts. Facts are either buried or fuzzed up so as to make them less relevant.\r\n\r\nDespite journalist assertions they strive to report fairly, <a href=\"https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/media-bias-left-study/\">today</a> “it’s pretty much a fact that journalism is one of the most left-wing of all professions.” (Just look at how an NBC reporter covered for President Joe Biden while interviewing NASCAR event winner Brandon Brown Oct. 2 in Alabama: with the crowd clearly chanting “F*** Joe Biden,” she <a href=\"https://trendingpolitics.com/nbc-reporters-desperate-attempt-to-interpret-f-joe-biden-chant-results-in-3-word-anthem-thats-going-nationwide-knab/?utm_source=ilmf&amp;amp;utm_medium=klaviyo&amp;amp;_kx=saLJ6eCUfc4XxwOJb62j6CotRgL7EHCOtp8ujhC0Nhc%3D.XhZFkN\">ridiculously</a> told the television audience the crowd was chanting, “Let’s go Brandon.”) So it follows that liberal news sources beget liberal fact-checkers who rush to defend liberal voices. Their skills are in particular need with Biden whom they often have to rescue from incidents of buffoonery or falsification – a practice becoming more difficult with each word he utters.\r\n\r\nAn example of the former occurred on Aug. 10 when a clip of Biden was aired in which he said preventative measures for hurricanes included getting vaccinated early, seemingly as if to suggest vaccinations prevent hurricanes. Critics bombarded him before liberal fact-checkers rushed to clarify what he meant.\r\n\r\nMore on point is a <a href=\"https://www.blabber.buzz/blab/pop/1026482-biden-can-now-lie-as-much-as-he-wants?utm_source=c-alrt&amp;amp;utm_medium=c-alrt-email&amp;amp;utm_term=c-alrt-AOL&amp;amp;utm_content=71CsvjERjkWlnzPfj4F2RwQPqK4QSbag_nmEHEQnJJic.A\">tweet</a> by Washington Post fact-checker Glenn Kessler. He gave notice his newspaper would not maintain a fact-checking database on Biden past his first 100 days in office. Such an announcement about a politician who has built his career by telling one falsehood after another – even forcing him to <a href=\"https://time.com/5636715/biden-1988-presidential-campaign/\">drop</a> out of the 1988 presidential campaign for doing so – and, especially after <a href=\"https://www.govexec.com/defense/2021/09/austin-milley-insist-no-one-foresaw-kabuls-quick-fall-some-senators-are-dubious/185710/\">lying</a> to the American public he had never been advised by his military leaders to keep a military presence in Afghanistan contrary to their recent sworn testimony – strongly suggests the paper recognizes it can only go so far with its fact-checking defense of Biden before losing all credibility.\r\n\r\nLiberal fact-checkers also look to falsely portray conservative voices as hypocritical. Supposedly non-partisan PolitiFact, which seeks to hold politicians accountable for their claims, <a href=\"https://www.westernjournal.com/fact-checking-fact-check-politifact-falsely-claims-republicans-tried-rig-supreme-court/\">challenged</a> the statement by Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, “You didn’t see Republicans when we had control of the Senate try to rig the game. You didn’t see us try to pack the (Supreme) Court” from nine to 13 members as Democrats <a href=\"https://www.westernjournal.com/red-state-ags-hit-back-dems-attempt-pack-supreme-court/\">sought</a> to do.\r\n\r\nPolitiFact gave Cruz a “false” rating, claiming Republicans had rigged the game. However, to make the argument, PolitiFact resorted to leftist spinning, basing its argument on redefining the rules of the game for Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) nominations. It claimed Republican efforts <a href=\"https://www.jta.org/2021/01/06/politics/merrick-garland-blocked-from-supreme-court-in-2016-nominated-as-bidens-attorney-general\">blocking</a> President Barack Obama’s nomination of Merrick Garland prior to the 2016 presidential election while supporting President Donald Trump’s <a href=\"https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/amy-coney-barrett-set-be-confirmed-supreme-court-monday-n1244748\">nomination</a> of Amy Coney Barrett prior to the 2020 presidential election represented “rigging the game.”\r\n\r\nBut, had PolitiFact been fair, it would have admitted rejecting or supporting SCOTUS nominees is in no way similar to seeking to create a majority by expanding the size of the high court. Additionally, Republican actions concerning both Garland and Barrett did not break the rules but followed them. A Senate responsible for giving or withholding SCOTUS approval was doing just that.\r\n\r\nOne of WND’s regular commentators, John Stossel, has even been <a href=\"https://www.wnd.com/2021/09/facebook-smeared-now-suing/\">victimized</a> by the sting of the liberal fact-checker’s non-factual whip.\r\n\r\nStossel had posted a video on Facebook reporting facts that suggested a bigger player in the recent California wildfires was probably government mismanagement as opposed to climate change. He went on to add, “Climate change has made things worse …” making it clear he was not dismissing global warming as a factor. Nonetheless, the fact-checker labeled Stossel’s government mismanagement claim as “misleading.”\r\n\r\nStrangely, to support this, the fact-checker chose to link to another article it found misleading for claiming “Forest fires are caused by poor management. Not by climate change.” Although Stossel’s article acknowledged climate change was a factor while the linked article did not – the fact-checker determined its decision that the latter – by excluding climate change – was misleading was sufficient evidence to declare Stossel’s – which included climate change – misleading as well. Of additional note is that the fact-checker is a pro-climate change group called Climate Feedback.\r\n\r\nStossel was able to interview two of three scientists who allegedly provided feedback for the fact-checker. He learned neither had even seen his video. After they did review it, one scientist said it definitely was not misleading as it did not exclude climate change. Despite this admission, neither Climate Feedback nor Facebook would change their claim Stossel’s piece was misleading.\r\n\r\nStossel then posted a video addressing climate change myths in which three climate scientists argued we are not doomed because we can adapt to climate change and rising sea levels, challenging climate alarmists to debate them. None did.\r\n\r\nFacebook slapped the video as being “partly false,” with only one reviewer agreeing to share why. His criticism only disputed the height of rising sea levels. Interestingly, while Facebook dinged Stossel for disagreeing that hurricanes had gotten stronger, this Facebook reviewer agreed with him.\r\n\r\nIn an interesting <a href=\"https://fivenation.com/illegal-alien-arrested-for-causing-wildfires-threatening-endangered-wildlife/\">development</a>, an illegal is under arrest now who is believed to have actually started the fire.\r\n\r\nWhile Stossel fully recognizes Facebook, as a private company, can choose whether to provide him with a platform, he says it has no “legal right to knowingly and recklessly lie about what I say.” He adds, “That’s defamation.” To underscore this point, he has filed a lawsuit against Facebook.\r\n\r\nWhile the meaning of “fact-checker” is obvious to the public, sadly a trusting public is largely oblivious to the fact some fact-checkers are not. Should one appear at your door this Halloween, undoubtedly, there is a liberal, unconcerned about truth, hiding behind the mask.\r\n\r\n<em>Image by <a href=\"https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:GlennKessler1.jpg\">Singerhmk</a>, <a href=\"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0\">CC BY 3.0</a>, via Wikimedia Commons.</em>\r\n\r\n<hr />\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<hr />\r\n\r\n<h2>Too Few Are Telling the Truth</h2>\r\n<h4>Not long ago, conservative media was not beholden to anyone. Today, most sites are stuck on the Big Tech gravy train.</h4>\r\nI'll keep this short. The rise of Pandemic Panic Theater, massive voter fraud, and other \"taboo\" topics have neutered a majority of conservative news sites. You'll notice they are very careful about what topics they tackle. Sure, they'll attack Critical Race Theory, Antifa, and the Biden-Harris regime, but you won't see them going after George Soros, Bill Gates, the World Economic Forum, or the Deep State, among others.\r\n\r\nThe reason is simple. They are beholden to Big Tech, and Big Tech doesn't allow certain topics to be discussed or they'll cut you off. Far too many conservative news outlets rely on Google, Facebook, and Twitter for the bulk of their traffic. They depend on big checks from Google ads to keep the sites running. I don't necessarily hold it against them. We all do what we need to do to survive. I just wish more would do like we have, which is to cut out Big Tech altogether.\r\n\r\nWe don't get Google checks. We don't have Facebook or Twitter buttons on our stories. We don't have a YouTube Channel (banned), and Instagram profile (never made one), or a TikTok (no thanks, CCO). We're not perfect, but we're doing everything we can to not owe anything to anyone... other than our readers. We owe YOU the truth. We owe YOU the facts that others won't reveal about topics that others won't tackle. And we owe America, this great land that allows us to take hold of these opportunities.\r\n\r\nLike I said, I don't hold other conservative sites under too much scrutiny over their choices. It's easy for people to point fingers when we're not the ones paying their bills or supporting their families. I just wish there were more who would break away. Today, only a handful of other major conservative news outlets have broken away from the Big Tech teat. Of course, we need help.\r\n\r\nThe best way you can help us grow and continue to bring proper news and opinions to the people is by donating. We appreciate everything, whether a dollar or $10,000. Anything brings us closer to a point of stability when we can hire writers, editors, and support staff to make the America First message louder. Our <strong><a href=\"https://noqreport.givingfuel.com/noq-report\">Giving Fuel page</a></strong> makes it easy to donate one-time or monthly. Alternatively, you can <strong><a href=\"https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&amp;hosted_button_id=BJBTSXXH3MLUN&amp;source=url\">donate through PayPal</a></strong> or Bitcoin as well. <strong>Bitcoin: 3A1ELVhGgrwrypwTJhPwnaTVGmuqyQrMB8</strong>\r\n\r\nOur network is currently comprised of nine sites:\r\n<ul>\r\n \t<li><a href=\"https://noqreport.com/\">NOQ Report</a></li>\r\n \t<li><a href=\"https://conservativeplaylist.com/\">Conservative Playlist</a></li>\r\n \t<li><a href=\"https://truthbasedmedia.com/\">Truth. Based. Media.</a></li>\r\n \t<li><a href=\"https://freedomfirstnetwork.com/\">Freedom First Network</a></li>\r\n \t<li><a href=\"https://basedunderground.com/\">Based Underground</a></li>\r\n \t<li><a href=\"https://uncanceled.news/\">Uncanceled News</a></li>\r\n \t<li><a href=\"https://americanconservativemovement.com/\">American Conservative Movement</a></li>\r\n \t<li><a href=\"https://conservativeplaybook.com/\">Conservative Playbook</a></li>\r\n \t<li><a href=\"https://ourgoldguy.com/\">Our Gold Guy</a></li>\r\n</ul>\r\nWe are also building partnerships with great conservative sites like <a href=\"https://thelibertydaily.com/\">The Liberty Daily</a> and <a href=\"https://www.theepochtimes.com/?utm_source=partner&amp;utm_campaign=noqreport\">The Epoch Times</a> to advance the message as loudly as possible, and we're always looking for others with which to partner.\r\n\r\nAlso, we could use contributions of content. If you write or want to start writing and you share our patriotic, conservative, America First ideology, contact us. The contact form on this and all pages on the site goes directly to me.\r\n\r\nSome of our content is spread across multiple sites. Other pieces of content are unique. We write most of what we post but we also draw from those willing to allow us to share their quality articles, videos, and podcasts. We collect the best content from fellow conservative sites that give us permission to republish them. We're not ego-driven; I'd much rather post a properly attributed story written by experts like <a href=\"https://www.mercola.com/\">Dr. Joseph Mercola</a> or <a href=\"https://naturalnews.com/\">Natural News</a> than rewrite it like so many outlets like to do. We're not here to take credit. We're here to spread the truth.\r\n\r\nWhile donations are the best way to help, you can also support us by buying through our sponsors:\r\n<ul>\r\n \t<li><a href=\"https://www.mypillow.com/\">MyPillow</a>: Use promo code \"NOQ\" to get up to 66% off AND you'll be helping a patriotic, America First company.</li>\r\n \t<li><a href=\"https://www.freedomphone.com/?ref=MAGA\">Freedom Phone</a>: Use promo code \"MAGA\" and get $50 off AND you'll be helping a patriotic, America First company.</li>\r\n \t<li><a href=\"https://ourgoldguy.com/contact/\">OurGoldGuy</a>: Tell them we sent you in your request to buy gold and it will help us... AND (wait for it) you'll be helping a patriotic, America First company.</li>\r\n</ul>\r\nWe know we could make a lot more money if we sold out like so many \"conservative\" publications out there. You won't find Google ads on our site for a reason. Yes, they're lucrative, but I don't like getting paid by minions of Satan (I don't like Google very much if you couldn't tell).\r\n\r\nTime is short. As the world spirals towards The Great Reset, the need for truthful journalism has never been greater. But in these times, we need as many conservative media voices as possible. <strong><a href=\"https://noqreport.givingfuel.com/noq-report\">Please help keep NOQ Report and the other sites in the network going</a></strong>. Our promise is this: We will never sell out America. If that means we're going to struggle for a while or even indefinitely, so be it. Integrity first. Truth first. America first.\r\n\r\nThank you and God Bless,\r\nJD Rucker\r\n\r\n<strong>Bitcoin: 32SeW2Ajn86g4dATWtWreABhEkiqxsKUGn</strong>"
<https://conservativeplaybook.com/2021/10/07/unmasking-the-fact-checkers/>