<https://theairlinewebsite.com/topic/570537-justin-trudeau/page/82/#comment-1949853>
<http://schema.org/text>
"Under Trudeau, soo Re than you think, Canadians will be the only people in the world being penalized just because they exist.\n \n\n\n\t \n \n\n\n\tSupreme Court reins in Biden's power on climate change\n \n\n\n\tThe Supreme Court on Thursday imposed major constraints on the breadth of EPA's authority to limit carbon emissions from power plants.\n \n\n\n\tWhy it matters: The 6-3 ruling in West Virginia v. EPA will likely make it harder for the Biden administration to meet its climate targets — and may tie the hands of future administrations that want to take aggressive action on climate change.\n \n\n\n\tDriving the news: The court said EPA lacks wide latitude under the current Clean Air Act to force changes in the country's power mix that speed movement toward zero-carbon tech.\n \n\n\n\t\n\t\t\"Congress did not grant EPA in Section 111(d) of the Clean Air Act the authority to devise emissions caps based on the generation shifting approach the Agency took in the Clean Power Plan,\" the conservative majority wrote in West Virginia v. EPA.\n\t \n\t\n\t\tChief Justice John Roberts wrote the opinion, joined by justices Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett. The three liberal justices, Elena Kagan, Sonia Sotomayor and Stephen Breyer, dissented.\n\t \n\t\n\t\tThe decision follows a major scientific report on the fast-closing window to prevent some of the most dangerous effects of global warming, which is already causing substantial harm.\n\t \n\n\n\n\tThe big picture: The new limits on executive power come as President Biden's huge clean energy investment package has stalled in Congress.\n \n\n\n\t\n\t\tThat puts a heavier burden on the federal agencies to cut planet-warming emissions with existing authorities, which now face new constraints.\n\t \n\t\n\t\tThe administration's climate goals include a 50% cut in economy-wide greenhouse gas emissions by 2030 and a fully decarbonized electricity sector by 2035.\n\t \n\t\n\t\tPower plants are the second-largest source of U.S. greenhouse gas emissions. \n\t \n\t\n\t\tThe administration is in the process of writing regulations for these facilities.\n\t \n\n\n\n\tCatch up fast: The case stems from lower court battles over Obama-era rules to cut carbon emissions from coal-fired power plants, and a more modest Trump-era replacement.\n \n\n\n\t\n\t\tNeither regulation is in effect. But last year, GOP-led states and coal companies successfullypetitioned the court to hear cases on the scope of EPA's power.\n\t \n\n\n\n\tWhat we're watching: How EPA will seek to cut emissions from coal-fired power plants in light of the ruling.\n \n\n\n\t\n\t\tIn March, EPA Administrator Michael Regan said the agency's plans include indirectly tackling CO2 with rules that target air and water pollution.\n\t \n\n\n\n\thttps://www.axios.com/2022/06/30/west-virginia-epa-supreme-court-climate-change?stream=top&amp;utm_source=alert&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;utm_campaign=alerts_all\n \n"
<https://theairlinewebsite.com/topic/570537-justin-trudeau/page/82/?tab=comments#comment-1949609>