_:n8a23c0791784476986b5a860efe047f6xb0
<http://schema.org/articleBody>
"After over three years of grinding toward a PhD, I have finally passed my qualifying exam. It's time to celebrate!\n\n\n\n\n\nWhat Is a Qualifying Exam?\n\n\n\nFor people who choose to pursue a PhD, there is a fairly common practice which involves three checkpoints: qualifying, candidacy, and defense. The first checkpoint is the qualifying exam, and in my experience it is held at the beginning of the second year of the program. \n\n\n\nThese types of exams come in many, many forms including traditional pen and paper exams, take home exams, essays, and oral exams.\n\n\n\nPersonally, I have yet to figure out the purpose of the qualifying exam, but different folks have different takes. For example, Stephen L describes the purpose like this:\n\n\n\nQualifying exams are used as a determinant of a student’s ability to think coherently and of their knowledge in a research field. It involves a number of courses and oral examinations that test the student on a department’s field of study, and a student’s research area.Are Qualifying Exams a Waste of Time?\n\n\n\nI see them more as a gate to make up for poor recruitment and teaching, but that's perhaps a subject for another time.\n\n\n\nMy History With Qualifying Exams\n\n\n\nAs some of you may know, I am actually in my fourth year of my PhD. That is obviously incredibly late to be taking a qualifying exam, but I have a bit of a reason for that. \n\n\n\nFirst, at the start of my third year, I switched departments. At that point, I had already taken and failed a qualifying exam in computer science. The format for that exam was a bit more traditional: three in-person exams reflecting finals for the three core courses in the department. As I've mentioned before, I had just barely failed that exam, but I wasn't exactly feeling good about myself. I felt like I was ready to keep moving through my program, but my department didn't think I was ready based on the results of a single exam. As a result, I jumped ship to a new department.\n\n\n\nWhen I switched from Computer Science and Engineering to Engineering Education, I had to start the process over again. In other words, I had to take the three core courses in the new department before I could take the qualifying exam. To make matters worse, my new department only offers the qualifying exam once a year in August. As a result, even though I had taken all of the core courses by January, I had to wait until August to demonstrate my knowledge of those courses. \n\n\n\nAt any rate, the format of the qualifying exam in the new department was very different. In short, I had to complete an essay for each of the core courses over the span of two weeks. These essays were graded on a rubric by a pair of faculty members who had to come to a consensus on whether or not I passed. If I had failed any of the questions, I would have had to take those portions of the exam again in a year. In addition, I had to complete an oral exam which involved critiquing some NSF proposals. The entire process took about a month from start to finish, and I just received my results earlier this week.  \n\n\n\nWhat Does It Feel Like to Finally Pass?\n\n\n\nTo be quite honest, I feel really, really good! I've been grinding away on this PhD since 2018, and I'm just now finishing my qualifying exam. This feels like a really long time coming, and I'm actually pretty proud of myself.\n\n\n\nThat said, that's not to say that I don't think the process of qualifying is a waste of time. It absolutely is! To me, qualifying exams feel like a way for departments to make up for several shortcomings over the span of the first year. Or to put it another way, what does it mean when a student fails their qualifying exam? In our hyper individualistic society, we tend to blame the student, but is it really the student's fault? Using my current department as an example, the only way a student can take the qualifying exam is if they pass the three core courses. Failing the student during the qualifying exam seems to reflect more of a failing of the core courses than of the individual student. \n\n\n\nTo make matters worse, one of my peers failed the exam, and suddenly I was taken back to where I was two years ago. Back then, I took the exam with a woman in my research group. She passed; I failed. This time around, I took the exam with another woman in my new research group. I passed; she failed. \n\n\n\nOverall, however, I am very excited to have passed. I just wish this gate didn't exist in the first place. \n\n\n\nLooking Ahead\n\n\n\nNow that I have passed my qualifying exam, the process of finishing up the PhD program has accelerated quite a bit. For example, I will be done taking classes next semester. In that same semester, I am planning to complete candidacy. At which point, I can start conducting my dissertation research. Overall, I am hoping to be done with my PhD right on time: Spring 2023. That was the original plan, and I'm sticking to it!\n\n\n\nWith that said, I think that's all I have for you today. As always, I'll keep writing about my journey until that journey is eventually over. In the meantime, why not check out some of the other things I've had to say about my this journey:\n\n\n\nMaking Drastic Changes in My PhD JourneyTwo Months Away From Getting a Master’s DegreeWhen Did I Become a Mentor?\n\n\n\nOtherwise, thanks for sticking around! I appreciate it."
<https://therenegadecoder.com/>