<https://www.creditinfocenter.com/community/topic/323901-hunt-henriques-are-after-me-too/page/7/#comment-1332325>
<http://schema.org/text>
"For the first two: Affidavits are inadmissible at trial. CA Evidence Code 1200, Elkins v Superior Court. \n  \nFor the Bill of sale: IRELEVANT (doesn't show defendant or alleged account), FOUNDATION, Doesn't meet the subcategories of CA Evidence Code 1271. \n  \nCCP 98 (I believe you have this one and there are plenty of examples here) \n  \nThe last 2 are IRELEVEANT (citing laws other than CA), are not admissible as business records as they do not meet the subcategories of CA Evidence Code 1271, and are inadmissible as HEARSAY under CA Evidence Code 1200, Elkins v Superior Court.  \n"
<https://www.creditinfocenter.com/community/topic/323901-hunt-henriques-are-after-me-too/page/7/?tab=comments#comment-1332310>