<https://boards.sportslogos.net/topic/121158-falcons-new-unis-2020/page/17/#comment-3074463>
<http://schema.org/text>
"craftsmanship is about an attention to detail, skills with tools, and being able to fulfill a vision with elegance. like fingerprints, they might be hard to see but there are traces left behind from the artist's hand where we find their competency, errors, or where their knowledge of craft either wanes or soars. these 3 shots specifically focus in on areas where craftsmanship is non existent. they are loaded with tangents, tight spaces, poor form (perspective and creating sense of light/shadow), oddly stray points, complexity, incredibly crass lines and shapes. im pretty certain the Jags logo appears so squished and skewed because it actually is. like, they took that artwork and stretched it rather than draw it properly. \n \n\n\n\t \n \n\n\n\tthese highlighted areas only touch at the surface. this is not about stylistic preferences or what someone might feel looks better. it is amateur craftsmanship that in worse cases (especially the Jaguars spots) makes the logo difficult to reproduce in various applications. the \"Nike era\" logos are visual equivalents of someone playing an instrument and constantly hitting bum notes or playing off-beat. the skills to execute their intention is simply not there.\n \n\n\n\t \n \n\n\n\tHarrington is actually one of the finest craftsman of logos i know and gives only a brief synopsis on the matter above. i wasn't being hyperbolic when i wrote you could teach a class on how not to build logos with these examples.  or that you could teach proper craft with the \"Reebok era\" group.\n \n\n\n\t \n \n\n\n\t \n \n\n\n\t \n \n\n\n\talso throwing in Fraser Davidson's points on the Panthers\n \n\n\n\t \n \n\n\n\t \n"
<https://boards.sportslogos.net/topic/121158-falcons-new-unis-2020/page/17/>