<http://schema.org/articleBody>
"I&amp;apos;ll give Hillary Clinton this, she&amp;apos;s more consistent in her stance on Iraq than GOP hopeful Mitt Romney is on abortion.\n\nIn 2002, Clinton voted for the war. In 2006, she&amp;apos;s no longer for the war, without quite seeking to end it. And she won&amp;apos;t say she should have been against it. She wouldn&amp;apos;t have started it herself, of course. And knowing then what she knows now, she certainly wouldn&amp;apos;t vote to go to war again. But it wasn&amp;apos;t wrong at the time to vote to allow Bush to start the war. Because it wasn&amp;apos;t really a war vote in the first place. Or something.\n\nEverytime Hillary tries to explain this, I want to whistle her for double dribbling. And then travelling. And then give her a technical foul for illegal defense. And another T for three seconds in the lane.\n\nAt least she&amp;apos;s not as cooked as Romney, though. Mitt went from being avowedly pro choice in the same year Hillary made her unmistakably mistaken war vote, 2002, declaring...\n\n&amp;quot;I&amp;apos;ve been very clear on that. I will preserve and protect a woman&amp;apos;s right to choose &amp;#x2014; and am devoted and dedicated to honoring my word in that regard.&amp;quot;\n\n... to now flatly declareing that &amp;quot;I&amp;apos;m Pro-Life.&amp;quot; I think that makes him both a flip-flopper and a liar. Or something. Let&amp;apos;s just whistle him for a flagrant foul.\n\nSeriously, how does a grown man &amp;#x2014; one who used to talk proudly about his mother&amp;apos;s bold, pro-life politics on the campaign trail &amp;#x2014; do a complete 180 on a subject as gut-level as abortion in his late 50&amp;apos;s?"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>
<http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/multiple-choice-mitt-20070221>