<http://schema.org/articleBody>
"Two women who filed a sexual harassment complaint against the Mexican restaurant where they worked have had their case sent back to trial court after an appeal.<br /><br />On Sept. 17, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit vacated and remanded <em>Equal Opportunity Employment Commission vs Simbaki Ltd.&nbsp;</em><br /><br />The case began with Kimberly Kulig and Laura Baatz, who worked for the Berryhill Baja Grill &amp; Cantina on Montrose Street in Houston.<br /><br />The claim that during their employment, the owner and operator of the franchise sexually harassed them on numerous occasions. The women filed a Title VII lawsuit against Berryhill Hot Tamales Corp.<br /><br />The district court dismissed their suit for failure to exhaust administrative remedies.<br /><br />The court concluded that the parties represented by counsel may too invoke the exceptions of the named-party requirement.<br /><br />Because the district court granted summary judgment on the grounds that Kulig and Baatz, as represented parties, could not rely on the exceptions to the named-party requirement, the district court did not determine whether they could fit within either the <em>Glus v. G.C. Murphy Co.</em> or <em>Eggleston v. Chicago Journeymen Plumbers' Local Union No. 130</em> exceptions.<br /><p style=\"line-height: 18.0pt; margin: 11.25pt 0in 6.0pt 0in;\">\"Accordingly, the court vacated and remanded for further proceedings,\" the appeals court wrote.</p>"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>
<http://setexasrecord.com/stories/510624532-restaurant-workers-have-harassment-case-remanded>