<http://schema.org/articleBody>
"As we mentioned yesterday, QTrax is finally having its launch. Yet while they've initially ballyhooed the idea that all four major labels are in support of the legal peer-to-peer music service, it seems someone at the new startup didn't fact-check with Warner Music Group prior to passing on the press release.\nAccording to Peter Kafka of Silicon Valley Insider,   Will Tanous, a spokesman for Warner Music Group, confirmed that QTrax does not have an agreement with the P2P service.  When the service launches tonight, if they do so with Warner's tracks in place, it could mean all legalities haven't been sorted out as they proclaim.  Mr. Kafka's sources say that QTrax and Warners did have an agreement they signed in 2006, but it expired in 2007 with renewal of the contract.\nAlso, while there aren't many details yet, it seems there may be a similar conflict between message first  delivered yesterday by QTrax and that which is given by Universal Music Group.\nAll in all, this is not an auspicious start for the supposedly legal P2P music service.  The company has a history of problems in trying to get started, and if you make claims of having major labels signed to your service that aren't, that's a good way to blow your reputation real fast.  Companies are going to question your reliability, advertisers will wonder if what they're supporting is legal, and users will be more confused than ever. QTrax (and perhaps its partners as well) need to get their house(s) in order, and soon."^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>
<http://mashable.com/2008/01/27/warner-music-group-not-on-board-with-qtrax/>