<http://schema.org/articleBody>
"Right on cue, the Electoral Commission has published findings from a number of UK e-voting trials, and just as expected, they went about as awry as they possibly could. Within the 24-page document resides a comedy of errors that would certainly put any other system on an eternal blacklist, but the blind faith in e-voting continues to allow events such as these to complicate democratic procedures. For starters, it was noted that the \"use of electronic counting significantly increased the total cost of delivering these elections compared with a manual count,\" and furthermore, the scanning of ballot papers \"took a lot longer than expected due to the need to scan certain batches more than once.\" Needless to say, the amount of mishaps involved are far too numerous to cover in this space, but hopefully the UK will take our interestingly administered warning to heart now that it has experienced similar turmoil. [Warning: PDF read link][Via The Inquirer, image courtesy of BBC]"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>
<http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/03/myriad-of-errors-mar-uk-e-voting-trials/>