<http://schema.org/articleBody>
"After grudgingly posting a notice stating that Samsung did not copy the iPad on its UK website, Apple was reprimanded by the UK court, which claimed the notice was \"untrue\" and \"incorrect\". Now, Apple has replaced it with a new notice, which follows the court's order to the letter. \nThe new notice is considerably shorter than the original one, merely stating that the \"High Court of Justice of England and Wales ruled that Samsung Electronic (UK) Limited\u2019s Galaxy Tablet Computers, namely the Galaxy Tab 10.1, Tab 8.9 and Tab 7.7 do not infringe Apple\u2019s Community registered design No. 0000181607-0001.\"\nOriginally, Apple added a number of snarky remarks and elaborated that the courts in Germany and the U.S. decided against Samsung in a similar case. Those parts are now gone. \n\nPer court's orders, Apple is also running an ad stating the details of the ruling in UK and industry papers."^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>
<http://mashable.com/2012/11/05/apple-replaces-samsung-didnt-copy-notice/?WT.mc_id=en_samsung>