<http://schema.org/articleBody>
"FacebookPinterest\n\nSo you're stuck in line at Chipotle, bored, behind on your news-reading\u2014yet not exactly jonesing for another rehash of the headlines. Enter the Hunger Reads, our daily compendium of the political stories we think you'll actually enjoy reading. (At least more than reading the take-out menu over and over.)\n\nThe Case for Obama: Why He Is A Great President. Yes, Great., Jonathan Chait, New York Magazine \n\nIt is noteworthy that four of the best decisions that Obama made during his presidency ran against the advice of much of his own administration. Numerous Democrats in Congress and the White House urged him to throw in the towel on health-care reform, but he was one of very few voices in his administration determined to see it through. Many of his own advisers, both economists steeped in free-market models and advisers anxious about a bailout-weary public, argued against his decision to extend credit to, and restructure, the auto industry. On Libya, Obama's staff presented him with options either to posture ineffectually or do nothing; he alone forced them to draw up an option that would prevent a massacre. And Obama overruled some cautious advisers and decided to kill Osama bin Laden.\nThe latter three decisions are all highly popular now, but all of them carried the risk of inflicting a mortal political wound, like Bill Clinton's health-care failure and Jimmy Carter's attempted raid into Iran. (George W. Bush, presented with a similar option, did not strike bin Laden.) In making these calls, Obama displayed judgment and nerve.\n\nThe Case Against Romney: At Heart, He's a Delusional One-Percenter, Jonathan Chait, New York Magazine\n\nSome version of Romney's own fantasy\u2014that, once in office, he will craft sensible and data-driven, and perhaps even bipartisan, solutions to our problems\u2014surely accounts for his political resurrection. Starting with the transformative first presidential debate, Romney has wafted the sweet, nostalgic scent of moderate Republicanism into the air. Might he offer the sort of pragmatic leadership that was the hallmark of his party in a bygone era\u2014a George H.W. Bush, a second-term Reagan, an Eisenhower, a Nixon minus the criminal paranoia? Some moderates supporting him, like reformist conservative Ross Douthat or the Des Moines Register editorial board, have filled the many voids of Romney's program with some version of this fantasy. It is an attractive scenario to many, and one worth considering seriously.\nThis hopeful vision immediately runs into a wall of deductive logic. If Romney were truly planning to govern from the center, why would he leave himself so exposed to Obama's attacks that he is a plutocrat peddling warmed-over Bushonomics? The election offers Romney his moment of maximal leverage over his party's right-wing base. If he actually wanted to cut a budget deal along the lines of Bowles-Simpson, or replace Dodd-Frank with some other way of preventing the next financial crisis, or replace Obamacare with some other plan to cover the uninsured, there would be no better time to announce it than now, when he could sorely use some hard evidence of his moderation. He has not done so\u2014either because he does not want to or because he fears a revolt by the Republican base. But if he fears such a revolt now, when his base has no recourse but to withhold support and reelect Obama, he will also fear it once in office, when conservatives could oppose him without making their worst political nightmare come true as a result.\n\nRead more on Death Race 2012\n\nThe View of Sandy From Washington, Where, For Once, It Isn't About Us \n\nHow Sandy Might Decide the Election (Oh Come On\u2014Indulge Us)\n\nThe One-Question Q&amp;amp;A: Checking in with Capital Weather Gang's Jason Samenow\n\nThe Frankenstorm versus The Election: A Round-up of Bored Politicos Stuck at Home\n\nFollow us @GQPolitics on Twitter for more updates on the campaign trail"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>
<http://www.gq.com/story/hunger-reads-a-case-for-and-against-our-presidential-candidates>