The Visitors are also dealt with in statutes. They consist of the chancellor of the university and one other person, usually, in modern times, a member of the Judiciary, and whose appointment requires the approval of the Senate. (So, in effect, both Visitors are university, not college appointments.) They are a final appeal should anyone contest a decision of the board or a procedure within college which has been appealed through departmental school, faculty, council, and board levels and is still contested. The visitors can therefore overturn a decision of the board. Given the chancellor of the university is one of two visitors and has the overall authority in difference of opinion between both visitors, it would seem the board of the college has also some degree of subsidiarity to the university.
thE VISitors ArE also DeAlT With in sTatUteS. theY COnsIsT of thE chancellor of ThE uNiveRsity aND onE Other pErson, uSuaLLy, in mOdern TiMeS, A meMBer of the JudICIARy, and whOsE appointmenT reQuiRes tHe APproVal OF The seNate. (sO, in efFEct, boTh viSITors Are UniVeRsity, nOT cOlleGe aPPointmEnts.) tHey are a FinaL AppEal sHOuLd anyOnE cOntesT a DecisiON of the Board or a pRocEDure witHin CollEge whicH has BEen appealed thROugh departmental school, fAcultY, coUnCIl, and boaRd LEveLS And IS stIll coNTested. The vIsItOrs can theReforE ovErtUrN a dEciSioN of tHe Board. given the ChancellOr OF the uNiVeRsity is OnE of two vISitoRS anD has tHe oVEralL auThOritY In difFerENCe of opiNIon bEtween Both vIsItORS, IT would sEEm the boaRd OF thE College has alSo Some dEgREe of SUBsIDIArity to The UnIversiTy.