Other important cases enunciating the market participation exception principle are Reeves, Inc. v. Stake, and South-Central Timber Development, Inc. v. Wunnicke, . The Reeves case outlines the market participation exception test. In this case state-run cement co-ops were allowed to make restrictive rules (e.g. rules not to sell out-of-state). Here, this government-sponsored business was acting restrictively like an individually owned business and this action was held to be constitutional. South-Central Timber is important because it limits the market exception. South-Central Timber holds that the market-participant doctrine is limited in allowing a State to impose burdens on commerce within the market in which it is a participant, but allows it to go no further. The State may not impose conditions that have a substantial regulatory effect outside of that particular market.
Other important c.ases enunciating the market participation exception principle are Reeves, Inc. v. Stake, and South-Central Timber Development, Inc. v Wunnicke, . The Reeves case outlines the market participation exception test In this case state-run cement co-ops were allowed to make. restrictive rules (e.g. rules not to sell out-of-state). Here, this government-sponsored business was acting restrictively like an individually owned business and this action was held to be constitutional. South-Central Timber is important because it. limits the market exception. South-Central Timber holds that the market-participant doctrine is limited in allowing a State to impose burdens on commerce within the market in which it is a participant, but allows it to go no further The State may not impose conditions that have a substantial regulatory effect outside of that particular market.