Further attested children of Sin include the goddesses Amarazu and Amaraḫea, known from the god list An = Anum, Ningublaga (the city god of Kiabrig) and Numushda (the city god of Kazallu). Ningublaga's connection with the moon god is well attested in god lists (An = Anum, the Weidner god list, the Nippur god list) and other sources, one example being the formula "servant of Sin and Ningublaga," known from an Old Babylonian cylinder seal. While he was not always explicitly identified as his son, with such references lacking for example from An = Anum, direct statements confirming the existence of such a tradition have been identified in an inscription of Abisare of Larsa and in a hymn dedicated to Ningublaga's temple in Kiabrig. Designating Numushda as a son of Sin was likely meant to be a way to assimilate him into the pantheon of lower Mesopotamia, and might be based on perceived similarity to Ningublaga. The tradition according to which he was a son of the moon god is absent from sources from the third millennium BCE. Additionally, a single literary text calls Numushda a son of Enki, rather than Sin and Ningal. Amarazu and Amaraḫea are overall sparsely attested, and despite their status as Sin's daughters in god lists and the incantation series Udug Hul there is no evidence they were worshiped alongside him in Ur. The reason behind the association between these two goddesses and the moon god is unknown.
further attested children of sin include the goddesses amarazu and amaraḫea known from the god list an = anum ningublaga (the city god of kiabrig) and numushda (the city god of kazallu) ningublaga's connection with the moon god is well attested in god lists (an = anum the weidner god list the nippur god list) and other sources one example being the formula "servant of sin and ningublaga" known from an old babylonian cylinder seal while he was not always explicitly identified as his son with such references lacking for example from an = anum direct statements confirming the existence of such a tradition have been identified in an inscription of abisare of larsa and in a hymn dedicated to ningublaga's temple in kiabrig designating numushda as a son of sin was likely meant to be a way to assimilate him into the pantheon of lower mesopotamia and might be based on perceived similarity to ningublaga the tradition according to which he was a son of the moon god is absent from sources from the third millennium bce additionally a single literary text calls numushda a son of enki rather than sin and ningal amarazu and amaraḫea are overall sparsely attested and despite their status as sin's daughters in god lists and the incantation series udug hul there is no evidence they were worshiped alongside him in ur the reason behind the association between these two goddesses and the moon god is unknown