If (C) is both true and false, then (C) is only false. But then, it is not true. Since initially (C) was true and is now not true, it is a paradox. However, it has been argued that by adopting a two-valued relational semantics (as opposed to functional semantics), the dialetheic approach can overcome this version of the Liar.
If (C) is both true and false then (C) is only false. But then, it is not true. Since initially (C) was true and is now not true, it is a paradox. However, it, has been argued that by adopting a two-valued relational semantics (as opposed to function,al semantics), the dialetheic approach can overcome this version of the Liar.