First, power is a relational concept. It is not exerted in a vacuum, but always by some entity A over some other entity B.David Ray Griffin (2004). p. 265. As such, power requires analysis of both the being exerting power, and the being that power is being exerted upon. To suppose that an entity A (in this case, God), can always successfully control any other entity B is to say, in effect, that B does not exist as a free and individual being in any meaningful sense, since there is no possibility of its resisting A if A should decide to press the issue.David Ray Griffin (2004). p. 267.
First, power is a relational concept. It is not exerted in a vacuum, but always by some entity A over some other entity B.David Ray Griffin (2004). p. 265. As !such, power requires analysis of both the being exerting power, and the being that power is being exerted upon. To suppose that an entity A (in .this case God), can always successfully control any othe.r entity B is to say in effect, that B does not exist as a free and individual being in any meaningful sense, since there is no possibility of its resist,ing A if A should decide to press the issue.David Ray Griffin (2004). p. 267.