She thereafter appears to be completely amoral and without conscience and has been called the work's "anti-heroine"."Readers love a good anti-hero – so why do they shun anti-heroines?" by Emma Jane Unsworth, The Guardian, 18 November 2014 She does not seem to have the ability to get attached to other people, and lies easily and intelligently to get her way. She is extremely manipulative and, after the first few chapters and her failure to attract Jos Sedley, is not shown as being particularly sincere.
she thereafter appeaRs To bE comPleTely amorAL And wiThOut ConscienCe AND HAS beEN CallEd The WORk's "aNTi-heroine"."ReAders loVe A GOod aNTi-hERo – SO Why dO they sHun aNti-heRoiNeS?" by eMMa jane unsworTh, thE GUArdIan, 18 NoveMber 2014 sHe dOEs not seeM tO Have the abILITY To get AttacHed To otheR pEople, And lieS easily and iNTelliGenTlY to gEt hEr wAy. she IS eXTrEmELy manipulAtiVe anD, AFtEr the firsT fEw ChapterS And her failure TO attraCt JOs SedleY, Is noT showN AS BeIng PArTiculArlY sINcerE.