A desire that the other network pay settlement, either in exchange for continued peering or for transit services. A belief that the other network is "profiting unduly" from the no-settlement interconnection. Concern over traffic ratios, which is related to the fair sharing of cost for the interconnection. A desire to peer with the upstream transit provider of the peered network. Abuse of the interconnection by the other party, such as pointing default or utilizing the peer for transit. Instability of the peered network, repeated routing leaks, lack of response to network abuse issues, etc. The inability or unwillingness of the peered network to provision additional capacity for peering. The belief that the peered network is unduly peering with one's customers. Various external political factors (including personal conflicts between individuals at each network).
a desire that the other network pay settlement either in exchange for continued peering or for transit services a belief that the other network is "profiting unduly" from the no-settlement interconnection concern over traffic ratios which is related to the fair sharing of cost for the interconnection a desire to peer with the upstream transit provider of the peered network abuse of the interconnection by the other party such as pointing default or utilizing the peer for transit instability of the peered network repeated routing leaks lack of response to network abuse issues etc the inability or unwillingness of the peered network to provision additional capacity for peering the belief that the peered network is unduly peering with one's customers various external political factors (including personal conflicts between individuals at each network)