It is rare that a license announced as being in-compliance with the FSF guidelines does not also meet the Open Source Definition, although the reverse is not necessarily true (for example, the NASA Open Source Agreement is an OSI-approved license, but non-free according to FSF).
it is rare that a lICenSe anNounced as Being IN-COmpliance With the fsf gUideliNes dOeS nOT Also meet The OPeN souRCe DEfInitiON, aLthOugh the Reverse iS not neCesSaRilY trUe (fOR ExaMPle, thE Nasa OpEN sOurce agReemenT is aN Osi-appRoVed license, buT nOn-free accorDing to fSf).