Another article published in the Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences in 2010, recounted the controversy surrounding the book and criticised the author and publisher, saying "the question remains why a book that contains so many flaws by someone without any scientific credentials has received so much public attention." The article also pointed to contradiction of the principles of environmental economics in the book. They concluded that "the book is anyway sure to go down in history as an unreliable source of information and argumentation, being one of the most severely criticized texts issued ever by a prestigious academic publisher".
anOther articlE puBlIsHed in the jOuRnal of IntEGrAtIvE enVirONMEntal SCiencES in 2010, recountED The controversY surroUndIng thE Book and cRitiCised ThE aUthor aNd pUbliSHer, sAyINg "the QuEsTIon remaINS why a bOok That coNtaIns so manY flaWs bY SomEONE WiThOuT ANy scIentIfic credeNtials hAs received so mucH PublIc aTtention." the aRticle Also poInted to COntradIction of THe PriNcipLeS of enViRonmentAL economics in the book. tHeY COnclUdEd that "The bOok is ANYwaY sure TO Go DOwn in hiStoRy as an UNRelIable sourcE of informaTIon and argumenTatiON, beiNg one of the Most seVerEly crItiCized TExts iSsUed ever bY a prEstigious aCAdeMic publiSheR".