If a party gives consent to a search, a warrant is not required. There are exceptions and complications to the rule, including the scope of the consent given, whether the consent is voluntarily given, and whether an individual has the right to consent to a search of another's property.Holcomb, J. W. (March 2003).Obtaining Written Consent to Search. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin In Schneckloth v. Bustamonte (1973), the Court ruled that a consent search is still valid even if the police do not inform a suspect of his right to refuse the search.Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, . This contrasts with Fifth Amendment rights, which cannot be relinquished without an explicit Miranda warning from police.
If a party gives consent to a search a warrant is not required There are exceptions and complications to the rule including the scope of the consent given whether the consent is voluntarily given and whether an individual has the right to consent to a search of another's propertyHolcomb J W (March 2003)Obtaining Written Consent to Search FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin In Schneckloth v Bustamonte (1973) the Court ruled that a consent search is still valid even if the police do not inform a suspect of his right to refuse the searchSchneckloth v Bustamonte  This contrasts with Fifth Amendment rights which cannot be relinquished without an explicit Miranda warning from police