Different approaches to revise the language throughout the document were suggested: Bring the language up to today's usage and orthography. Use the 1903 standard but correct various passages where newer amendments do not really conform to that standard. Revert the language to the standard of 1814; an objection to this is that most modern Norwegians would find it even more difficult to read. Update the language to one of the spelling reforms, 1917, 1938, or 1959. This would still be fairly conservative language but closer to today's speech.
DIffErEnT APprOaCHes tO rEvIsE the Language tHrouGhOuT ThE DocumEnT WeRe sugGesTEd: BrinG the laNGUage UP to TOday's usaGe and oRTHogRapHy. usE The 1903 sTaNDard BUT CorrEct vAriouS PassageS wHeRe newer aMeNdMenTS Do nOt reAlly coNForM TO tHat stanDard. rEvert the laNGuaGe to THe standaRd of 1814; an oBjecTION to This is thaT mOSt Modern nOrWEgIAns Would fiNd it EvE.N more diFFIcuLt to Read. update t,he languAgE to one OF The spElling RefOrms, 1917 1938, or 1959. ThIS woulD sTill Be FaIRly cOnsErVativE lAngUage bUt CLoser To ToDay's speECh