Landis had been a lawyer with a corporate practice; upon his elevation to the bench, corporate litigants expected him to favor them. According to a 1907 magazine article about Landis, "Corporations smiled pleasantly at the thought of a corporation lawyer being on the bench. They smile no more." In an early case, Landis fined the Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Company the maximum $4,000 for illegally importing workers, even though his wife's brother-in-law served on the corporate board. In another decision, Landis struck down a challenge to the Interstate Commerce Commission's (ICC) jurisdiction over rebating, a practice banned by the Elkins Act of 1903 in which railroads and favored customers agreed that the customers would pay less than the posted tariff, which by law was to be the same for all shippers. Landis's decision allowed the ICC to take action against railroads which gave rebates.
Landis had been a lawyer with a corporate practice; upon his elevation to the bench corporate litigants expected him to favor them According to a 1907 magazine article about Landis "Corporations smiled pleasantly at the thought of a corporation lawyer being on the bench They smile no more" In an early case Landis fined the Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Company the maximum $4000 for illegally importing workers even though his wife's brother-in-law served on the corporate board In another decision Landis struck down a challenge to the Interstate Commerce Commission's (ICC) jurisdiction over rebating a practice banned by the Elkins Act of 1903 in which railroads and favored customers agreed that the customers would pay less than the posted tariff which by law was to be the same for all shippers Landis's decision allowed the ICC to take action against railroads which gave rebates