3. The method of claim 1 further comprising: the processor receiving source data relating to a subject; and the processor computing a plurality of derived features based at least in part on the received source data; wherein the data processed by the processing step comprises the source data and the derived features; and wherein the generating step comprises the processor generating an evaluation indicator indicative of whether a narrative story relating to the processed data that incorporates a story angle of the angle set data structure whose applicability conditions were satisfied by the processed data is to be generated.
3. The method of claim 1 further comprising: the processor receiving source data relating to a subject; and the processor computing a plurality of derived features based at least in part on the received source data; wherein the data processed by the processing step comprises the source data and the derived features; and wherein the generating step comprises the processor generating an evaluation indicator indicative of whether a narrative story relating to the processed data that incorporates a story angle of the angle set data structure whose applicability conditions were satisfied by the processed data is to be generated. 33. The method of claim 3 further comprising the processor communicating the evaluation indicator to a remote processor.