15. The method of claim 5 , wherein identifying the final font comprises: determining an error metric indicative of a difference between two or more glyphs of the related set and a representation of the two or more glyphs of the related set generated using the dominant font; comparing the error metric to a threshold indicative of a likelihood that the two or more glyphs of the related set are part of the dominant font; determining that the error metric is less than a threshold; and selecting, for the two or more glyphs of the related set, the final font as the dominant font.
15. The method of claim 5 , wherein identifying the final font comprises: determining an error metric indicative of a difference between two or more glyphs of the related set and a representation of the two or more glyphs of the related set generated using the dominant font; comparing the error metric to a threshold indicative of a likelihood that the two or more glyphs of the related set are part of the dominant font; determining that the error metric is less than a threshold; and selecting, for the two or more glyphs of the related set, the final font as the dominant font. 16. The method of claim 15 , wherein the font different from the dominant font is a variant of the dominant font, the variant of the dominant font being at least one of a bold variant, an italic variant, an underlined variant or a strikethrough variant of the dominant font.