8. The method as defined in claim 1 wherein the act of determining whether either glyph has a relevant cut-in value comprises: determining the subsequent glyph is a superscript glyph; finding the relevant horizontal boundary for the subsequent glyph, wherein the relevant horizontal boundary is the bottom of the subsequent glyph bounding box; evaluating one or more upper-right corner predetermined cut-in values associated with the base glyph; and comparing the relevant horizontal boundary to the predetermined cut-in values to determine the relevant predetermined cut-in value.
8. The method as defined in claim 1 wherein the act of determining whether either glyph has a relevant cut-in value comprises: determining the subsequent glyph is a superscript glyph; finding the relevant horizontal boundary for the subsequent glyph, wherein the relevant horizontal boundary is the bottom of the subsequent glyph bounding box; evaluating one or more upper-right corner predetermined cut-in values associated with the base glyph; and comparing the relevant horizontal boundary to the predetermined cut-in values to determine the relevant predetermined cut-in value. 9. The method as defined in claim 8 wherein the relevant predetermined cut-in value applied is the highest cut-in value below the bottom boundary of the subsequent glyph.