3. The computer implemented method of claim 1 wherein on the user interface when expected text is different from recognized text, a comparison result is classified into one of three types; a number of linguistic units is the same between recognized and expected portions, more expected text in the mismatched portion than recognized text, and more recognized text than expected text.
4. The computer implemented method of claim 3 wherein if the number of linguistic units is the same, the method further comprises: generating timing information from an associated recognized word for an expected word.