title: Compare Pros and Cons of Autofeature/autotest vs Guard?
body: <p>Does anyone have any concrete reasoning for using one autotesting runner over another?  I've used both Autofeature+autotest, I really like the built-in process that this sets up in that it runs my rspec unit tests first, and then the cucumber tests, and only the last failing test - it lends itself to the standard workflow of writing the cucumber tests, setting up the steps until they fail and then dropping down into unit tests for the detailed functionality.</p>
  
  <p>I've used guard in the standard rspec configuration and it's worked well also, but I didn't fold in the cucumber tests - didn't have time to experiment further.</p>
  
  <p>Just wondering if anyone has any specific reasons for using one over another, or whether one way mitigates a weakness of the other.</p>
  
  <p>Thanks for the input,
  Tony</p>