title: Is WPF Dispatcher the solution of multi threading problems?
body: <p>I have a very bad feeling about using lock in my code but now the Dispatcher of WindowBase exists and I want to use it everywhere.</p>
  
  <p>For example I use a multi thread singleton WCF service who publish events on the EventAggregator of PRISM, the payload is immutable (it is just data) and every thread with a dispatcher can retrieve the event gracefully, whitout deadlock in their own dispatcher.  (Not only UI thread, but also threads with database calls, threads with services call, threads which log or other threads with slow calls, because I don't want to freeze the UI).</p>
  
  <p>But my problem is that this Dispatcher is coupled with WPF so I feel a bit guilty when I use it everywhere, I feel that the dispatcher was not created for my use case in mind.</p>
  
  <p>Does it exist another Dispatcher implementation not coupled with WPF ? or that's OK to abuse it ?</p>
  
  <p>Thanks,</p>
  
  <p><strong>Update</strong></p>
  
  <p>The solution that Paul Stovell give to me is to create an interface IDispatcher, and an adapter for the Wpf Dispatcher, so this will be easier to test !
  This solution was good for me because, I refactored my tests and I can now use a SynchronousDispatcherAdapter in my tests (Thanks to it, I don't have to use the Dispatcher of WPF in my tests).</p>
  
  <p>Using the Dispatcher instead of a BackgroundWorker make sense, because I'm using a multi publisher / subscriber pattern (with PRISM), and thanks to the Dispatcher every event handler are called on threads who subscribe them to the event. This means that the only point where multi threading issue can happen is at the payload of my event (I made him immutable).</p>
  
  <p>My different threads don't communicate directly between them they can just publish and subscribe to event.
  Thus, database calls, logs calls, services calls, UI calls run on different threads and don't know about each other (they only know about events they subscribe and publish).</p>
  
  <p>The background worker will make sense, when I will make some calls from my UI to a repository.</p>
  
  <p>But I hope to find a design without using BackgroundWorker because I prefere to use this subscriber/publisher pattern (I think it makes my code more readable)</p>