title: Angular Material VS Materializecss
body: <p>Well, it's about a week i'm trying to running up an application with Angular Material.<br>
  After so much challenging with Angular Material and its nerve wracking bugs (that might be never solved because of their milestone to releasing V2 for angular V2 as soon as possible), now it's blowing my mind, that why i have to use <code>616KB JS+CSS</code> Angular Material module instead of <code>254KB JS+CSS</code> Materializecss.<br>
  As i know (tell me if i'm wrong!):</p>
  
  <blockquote>
    <p>It's best to try and avoid changing DOM elements whenever possible</p>
  </blockquote>
  
  <p>But Angular materials base is directives that cause a lot of reflows/repaints, and actually based on demos i saw, Materializecss was much faster and lighter than Angular Material.<br>
  That's obvious Angular Material is more Angular-friendly and has some specific features like <code>$mdThemingProvider</code> and ..., but i have my doubts about using Angular Material or maybe its performance.<br>
  Any words to make me believe again in Angular Material?<br>
  Is it worth to use Angular Material instead of pure Angular + Materializecss ?<br>
  Because i can't see any major change in result of them?</p>