title: Open-Minded yet Objective Opinion on CMS User-Friendliness
body: <p>I have worked with a number of <code>Content Management Systems</code> out there (and even built my own when necessary). I know what works best for me, but since <em>I don't pay myself to make CMS sites</em>, what I think matters quite little.</p>
  
  <p>I know <code>CMS</code> isn't necessarily <em>one-size-fits-all</em> so "XYZ is the best!" isn't going to cut it. I'm <strong>hoping</strong> to get some <em>demographic associated</em> information as well.</p>
  
  <p>eg.</p>
  
  <ul>
  <li><code>CMS 1</code> is easy to develop in, but can be cumbersome for n00b admins.</li>
  <li><code>CMS 2</code> is great for stay at home moms to admin, but lacks all the good plugins.</li>
  <li><code>CMS 3</code> I've heard good things about this, but it's not my personal favorite.</li>
  <li>etc</li>
  </ul>
  
  <p>Some will say that this question is quite <em>subjective</em>, and while I can agree, there is still a very <strong>GOOD</strong> answer out there and I would like to get that answer from the people who work with <code>CMS</code> technology as a profession.</p>
  
  <p>If you have <em>prized information</em> you would like to share with me, <strong>please keep in mind</strong> that there is a <strong>three-fold</strong> focus on a) <code>The administration</code> b) <code>The end-user</code> and c) <code>The development</code> with the administration (the one usually shelling out the $$) being the most <em>important</em> to my question.</p>
  
  <p><strong>Thank You</strong> for giving your input.</p>