title: Does a concurrent hashmap not require synchronized getters/setters?
body: <p>If i was using a concurrent hashmap and i had methods which set and got values, as im using a concurrent hashmap would i need to make the getter and setter synchronized? Is this redundant? Is one design better? </p>
  
  <p>Also, is a concurrent hashmap without synchronization faster than a hashmap with synchronized getters and setters? This is for a high performance system</p>
  
  <p>Thank you</p>