title: Are full links when linking resources worse than paths?
body: <p>The question is very simple and even tho I might get downvoted into oblivion for it, I can't find a good search query for this.</p>
  
  <p>If I link images, stylesheets, scripts and other things with the full website url (<a href="http://url.tld/css/style.css" rel="nofollow">http://url.tld/css/style.css</a>) instead of path (css/style.css) , are the visitors affected negatively? Is there any difference?</p>
  
  <p>The html page is on the same link as the resource, so we're not talking about external resources.</p>