title: In SVMs, is one-vs-all or one-vs-one more interpretable?
body: <p>I know that one-vs-all only has to create K classifiers for K classes and one-vs-one creates 2 choose K classifiers for K classes so does that mean that one-vs-all is more interpretable since it is easier to explain?</p>
  <p>At first, I thought they might have the &quot;same level&quot; of interpretability but I really am not sure. I think that is the only difference I see making an impact on interpretability but maybe I am missing something.</p>