title: is Boost.Geometry mature enough?
body: <p>I've been recently hired by a GIS company to rewrite their old geomatics libraries. So I'm currently looking for a good computational geometry library. I've seen CGAL, which is amazing, but my boss wants something free. </p>
  
  <p>So I'm now checking Boost.Geometry. This library seems great, but it also seems that it is changing pretty fast. A lot of things are not implemented yet, and a lot of issues are discussed on the mailing list.</p>
  
  <p>Hence my question : is Boost.Geometry mature enough so I can build something on it ? Or is the design still going to evolve ?</p>
  
  <p>Thanks</p>