title: when use webcomponents-loader instead of webcomponents-lite
body: <p>I have these two dependencies in my bower.json: Polymer/polymer#^2.6.0 and webcomponents/webcomponentsjs#^v1.1.0.</p>
  
  <p>In my index.html I don't see any difference if I add</p>
  
  <pre><code>&lt;script src="bower_components/webcomponentsjs/webcomponents-lite.js"&gt;
  or  
  &lt;script src="bower_components/webcomponentsjs/webcomponents-loader.js"&gt;.
  </code></pre>
  
  <p>From <a href="https://www.npmjs.com/package/webcomponents-lite" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://www.npmjs.com/package/webcomponents-lite</a> I read "webcomponents-lite.js includes all polyfills except for shadow DOM" and from <a href="https://www.npmjs.com/package/web-components-loader" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://www.npmjs.com/package/web-components-loader</a> I read "Copies the HTML file and all of its dependencies to a namespaced location in your public/output directory". Can I assume that web-components-loader does what webcomponents-lite does by default plus few other loading features? Is there any reason to use one instead of other? It seems webcomponents-lite does less loading process so if it matches my needs would it be better than webcomponents-loader?</p>