title: How is: "A subclassOf of B, C" interpreted? As AND or OR in rdfs / owl / description logic?
body: <p>Is the following interpreted as the intersection (AND) in the sense that members of class A are members of B and C; or as the disjunction (OR) that members of A are a member of B, or a member of C, or member of both?</p>
  <pre><code>A rdf:type owl:Class ;
     rdfs:subClassOf some B; 
     rdfs:subClassOf only C. 
  </code></pre>
  <p>Thanks for clarification how this is interpreted!</p>
  <p>I found it as AND: <a href="https://stackoverflow.com/questions/47889590/protege-owl-subclass-of-two-classes">Protege OWL Subclass of two classes</a></p>
  <p>But Hermit breaks it and uses single axioms (e.g. A rdfs:subclassOf B) as explanation for A to B. I thought that would not be possible ...? Since I would say that A is a subclassOf (B and C) and not only A.</p>