title: lazyload images - index images in the search engines
body: <p>I believe that Google displays the <em>DOM</em> also modified by <em>Javascript</em>.
  Look I used the tool <em>Fetch as Google/Bing/Baidu</em></p>
  <p><strong>Look at the results:</strong></p>
  <blockquote>
  <p>Without my jquery-plugin and <strong>noscript</strong> (ie pure HTML):</p>
  <p><img src="https://i.stack.imgur.com/wcciP.jpg" alt="http://img845.imageshack.us/img845/2632/webpagethumbnail1.jpg" /></p>
  </blockquote>
  <hr />
  <blockquote>
  <p>With javascript and <strong>noscript</strong>:</p>
  <p><img src="https://i.stack.imgur.com/aN0Qz.jpg" alt="http://img138.imageshack.us/img138/3485/webpagethumbnail.jpg" /></p>
  <p><strong>note:</strong> The javascript that showcased images and manipulated the DOM.</p>
  </blockquote>
  <p><strong>LIB Javascript</strong></p>
  <p>Download and test-case: <a href="https://github.com/brcontainer/defer-images/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://github.com/brcontainer/defer-images/</a></p>
  <p><strong>Question:</strong></p>
  <ul>
  <li><p>Use <code>&lt;noscript&gt;</code> to help indexing of images is a good?</p>
  </li>
  <li><p>If it's a bad idea, give me an example of an HTML good for indexing images and I can use <em>LazyLoad</em>.</p>
  </li>
  <li><p>If the javascript displays images and <em>Fetch as Google/Bing/Baidu</em> displays the content normally (like the browser) so <em>Google/Bing/Baidu</em> indexes the DOM manipulated by javascript?</p>
  </li>
  </ul>