title: SpecFlow/Cucumber/Gherkin - Using tables in a scenario outline
body: <p>Hopefully I can explain my issue clearly enough for others to understand, here we go, imagine I have the two following hypothetical scenarios:</p>
  
  <pre><code>Scenario: Filter sweets by king size and nut content
  Given I am on the "Sweet/List" Page
  When I filter sweets by 
      | Field               | Value  |
      | Filter.KingSize     | True   |
      | Filter.ContainsNuts | False  |
  Then I should see :
      | Value            |
      | Yorkie King Size |
      | Mars King Size   |
  
  Scenario: Filter sweets by make
  Given I am on the "Sweet/List" Page
  When I filter sweets by 
      | Field        | Value  |
      | Filter.Make  | Haribo |
  Then I should see :
      | Value   |
      | Starmix |
  </code></pre>
  
  <p>These scenarios are useful because I can add as many When rows of Field/Value and Then Value entries as I like without changing the associated compiled test steps.  However copy/pasting scenarios for different filter tests will become repetitive and take up alot of code - something I would like to avoid.  Ideally I would like to create a scenario outline and keep the dynamic nature I have with the tests above, however when I try to do that I run into a problem defining the example table I cant add new rows as I see fit because that would be a new test instance, currently I have this:</p>
  
  <pre><code>Scenario Outline: Filter Sweets 
  Given I am on the &lt;page&gt; Page
  When I filter chocolates by 
      | Field    | Value   |
      | &lt;filter&gt; | &lt;value&gt; |
  Then I should see :
      | Output   |
      | &lt;output&gt; |
  Examples:
      | page       | filter      | value  | output  |
      | Sweet/List | Filter.Make | Haribo | Starmix |
  </code></pre>
  
  <p>So I have the problem of being able to dynamically add rows to my filter and expected data when using a scenario outline, is anyone aware of a way around this?  Should I be approaching this from a different angle?</p>
  
  <p>A workaround could be something like :</p>
  
  <pre><code>Then I should see :
      | Output |
      | &lt;x&gt;    |
      | &lt;y&gt;    |
      | &lt;z&gt;    |
      Examples:
      | x | y | z |
  </code></pre>
  
  <p>But thats not very dynamic.... hoping for a better solution? :)</p>