title: BASIC Object-Relation Mapping question asked by a noob
body: <p>I understand that, in the interest of efficiency, when you  query the database you should only return the columns that are needed and no more. </p>
  
  <p>But given that I like to use objects to store the query result, this leaves me in a dilemma: </p>
  
  <p>If I only retrieve the column values that I need in a particular situation, I can only partially populate the object. This, I feel, leaves my object in a non-ideal state where only some of the properties and methods are available. Later, if a situation arises where I would like to the reuse the object but find that the new situation requires a different but overlapping set of columns to be returned, I am faced with a choice.</p>
  
  <p>Should I reuse the existing SQL and add to the list of selected columns the additional fields that are required by the new situation so that the same query and object mapping logic can be reused for both? Or should I create another method that results in the execution of a slightly different SQL which results in the populating of only those object properties that were returned by the 2nd query?</p>
  
  <p>I strongly suspect that there is no magic answer and that the answer really "depends" on the situation but  I guess I am looking for general advice. In general, my approach has been to either return all columns from the queried table or to add to the query the additional columns as they are needed but to reuse the same SQL (and mapping code) that is, until performance becomes a concern. In general, I find that unless you are retrieving  a large number of row - and I usually am not - that the cost of adding additional columns to the output does not have a noticable effect on performance and that the savings in development time and the simplified API that result are a good trade off.</p>
  
  <p>But how do you deal with this situation when performance does become a factor? Do you create methods like </p>
  
  <p>Employees.GetPersonalInfo
  Employees.GetLittleMorePersonlInfoButMinusSalary
  etc, etc etc</p>
  
  <p>Or do you somehow end up creating an API where the user of your API has to specify which columns/properties he wants populated/returned, thereby adding complexity and making your API less friendly/easy to use? </p>
  
  <p>Let's say you want to get Employee info. How many objects would typically be involved?</p>
  
  <p>1) an Employee object
  2) An Employees collection object containing one Employee object for each Employee row returned
  3) An object, such as EmployeeQueries that returns contains methods such as "GetHiredThisWeek" which returns an Employees collection of 0 or more records.</p>
  
  <p>I realize all of this is very subjective, but I am looking for suggestions on what you have found works best for you.</p>