title: Performance tests between QueryDSL SQL vs JDBCTemplate
body: <p>I am trying to convince "the higher ups" to use querydsl sql for our persistence. But they prefer spring jdbctemplate, with the reason being it gives the best raw performance.</p>
  
  <p>Performance is our primary requirement ofcourse. Which is why JPA isnt an option at all. Is the QueryDSL SQL overhead too much to knock it off from our options?</p>
  
  <p>I wanted to know if there are any "recent" performance tests done to show how querydsl sql fares with jdbctemplate and jpa.</p>
  
  <p>I came across <a href="https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/querydsl/Uri-JsQD6CE" rel="noreferrer">this</a>.
  I want to know the relative performance of querydsl sql when compared against jdbctemplate and a jpa implementation.</p>