title: Will IOC solve our problems?
body: <p>Just trying to implement unit testing into a brownfield type system. Be aware i'm relatively new into the unit testing world. Its going to be a gradual migration of course because there are just so many areas of pain.   </p>
  
  <p>The current problem i'm trying to solve is we followed a lot of bad practices from our VB6 days and in the conversion of our app to .Net. We have LOT AN LOTS of shared/static functions which call other shared functions and those call others and so on. Sometimes depedencies are passed in as parameters and sometimes they are just newed up within the calling function. I've already instructed our developers to stop creating shared functions and instead create instance members and only use those instance members off of interfaces but that doesn't alleviate the current situation. So you must recursively pass in each and every dependency at the top layer for each function in your code path and method signatures are turning into a mess. </p>
  
  <p>I'm hoping this is something that IOC will fix. Currently we are using NUnit/Moq and i'm starting to investigate StructureMap. So far i understand that you pretty much tell StructureMap for x interface i want to default to the concrete class y:</p>
  
  <pre><code>ObjectFactory.Initialize(x=&gt;{x.ForRequestType&lt;IInterface&gt;().TheDefaultIsConcreteType&lt;MyClass&gt;()});
  </code></pre>
  
  <p>Then to runtime:</p>
  
  <pre><code>var mytype = ObjectFactory.GetInstance&lt;IInterface&gt;();
  </code></pre>
  
  <p>the IOC container will initialize the correct type for you. Not sure yet how to swap a fake in for the concrete type but hopefully thats simple. Again will IOC solve the problems i was talking about above? Is there a specific IOC framework that will do it better than StructureMap or can they all handle this situation. Any help would be much appreciated.</p>