title: Any thoughts on Surround scm?
body: <p>So looking at different version control systems: subversion, accurev, surround, tfs, bitkeeper/git/mercurial</p>
  
  <ul>
  <li>Subversion: I see it's quite the popular standard</li>
  <li>Accurev: There seems to be a love hate relationship around it.</li>
  <li>Surround and TFS: I haven't seen many comments around them.</li>
  <li>Bitkeeper/Git/Mercurial: Seem pretty popular, but I think "distributed" may scare my manager lol</li>
  </ul>
  
  <p>For some reason he seems attracted to Surround and it's not because of sales pitch. We had originally downloaded it for evaluation played around with it but nothing came of it. So now we are back to looking at scm and wants to try it again. So far I haven't seen any buzz around it like some other version control systems. Same for TFS</p>