

So I've had a feeling for a while regarding particle order, which I haven't
managed to find much of anything to either confirm or deny in any of the
learning resources I've tried, and I'm hoping someone here can tell me whether
it's actually true or I'm just imagining things.

It is generally taught that the order of particles in Japanese sentences is
(usually) grammatically not that important (there are conventions, of course,
and different placement may result in slightly different emphasis, but the
overall meaning is still the same even if you, for example, change whether the
を part or the に part comes first or second, etc). However, I have had the
impression for a while now that that may be not entirely true of は (the topic
particle)?

Specifically, to borrow a math/CS term, it feels to me like は has a slightly
lower "operator precedence" than most of the others, which is part of why it
commonly comes first. For example (off the top of my head, so it might not be
the best one):

  * 人は公園で歩いている -- "The person is walking in the park" (The topic is "the person" and the action is "walking in the park") 
  * 公園で人は歩いている -- "In the park, the person is walking" (The topic is "the person (in the context of being in the park)" and the action is "walking")

(I know that "in the park, the person" might actually usually be said
differently (公園では, etc), but my point is that even without that the placement
of 公園で before a later は changes a bit (the feel, at least, of) what it applies
to)

That is, it seems to me that if other particles, such as で or に are put
_before_ は, they can end up essentially modifying the topic, instead of the
sentence as a whole, so effectively, は can sometimes have a
grouping/partitioning effect on things that come before it (not always, but
sometimes), which isn't true of other particles.

In most cases, the effect is not really substantial (it often ends up coming
out with the same meaning in the end), but in some cases it seems like it
could potentially change the nuance of things noticeably, so I'm curious. Am I
completely off base with this? Does は actually work differently than other
particles in this regard?

**Edit:** So my example above was bad in a few ways, I guess. Here's one I
came across recently, though I'm not sure it exemplifies what I'm talking
about quite as strongly:

> この近所にコンビニはありますか？

It seems to me that the normal way to phrase this would be 「コンビニはこの近所にありますか」
("As for convenience stores, is there one in this neighborhood?"), but by
placing 「この近所に」 in front of 「コンビニは」, this has an effect of essentially making
it feel more like "As for convenience stores in this neighborhood, is there
one?" (that is, "in this neighborhood" becomes more tightly associated with
"convenience stores" and essentially serves to help refine the scope of the
topic). In this particular case, one could argue that the two questions end up
asking essentially the same thing, but I suspect that wouldn't always be the
case in all sentences, which is why I'm curious about this sort of thing.


CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-06-15T18:18:39.920
78039
2020-06-15T22:42:22.760
2020-06-15T22:41:11.343
35230
35230
question
particle-は
Position of は relative to other particles


First of all, 人は公園で歩いている sounds unnatural. To match the English translation,
you should say **その** 人は公園 **を** 歩いている. See
[this](https://japanese.stackexchange.com/q/3243/5010) for this を.

Second, despite your observation, その人は公園を歩いている and 公園をその人は歩いている have the same
basic meaning, although the latter is a little unusual and thus sounds like 公園
is emphasized. In both sentences, 公園を adverbially modifies 歩いている, not (その)人.
As a basic rule, ～を/～で on its own cannot modify a noun in the first place.
See: [using の with と,で, から,
まで](https://japanese.stackexchange.com/q/33605/5010)

If you want to say "The person in the park is walking", it's 公園にいる人は歩いている in
Japanese.

In conclusion, I was not able to get what you mean by "grouping". If you have
a better example that explains your problem, I'll take a look again.


CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-06-15T21:01:22.933
78042
2020-06-15T21:07:40.207
2020-06-15T21:07:40.207
5010
5010
78039
answer


From what I understand, the topic of the sentence is usually placed in the
beginning of the sentence. In essence, the Japanese word order is: **[topic] は
[other information] [verb].** You can _technically_ place the topic in the
middle of the sentence instead of the beginning, and it's _technically not
grammatically incorrect_ , but it sounds pretty odd and it doesn't change the
meaning or emphasis at all.

The topic in Japanese isn't strictly a solid sentence element to the same
degree as something like a subject or an object. Instead, any sentence element
outside of predicates (and with the て-form even that depends) **can become a
topic**. If the element to become a topic happens to be **a subject or an
object, the respective particles が and を get dropped**. If the element
involves a particle like に, で or と, the は is affixed to the end of the other
particle. The は tends to change the specific solid sentence element into a
more amorphous topic that's just "floating around" (if that makes sense), so
it tends to take emphasis away from whatever it's affixed to. That's a massive
simplification of course, since there are other uses for は too, but this is a
common one for it.

For example, let's examine the sentence 「アリスがケーキを食べている」, or "Alice is eating
cake", where the emphasis is on Alice doing the cake-eating. Both
「アリスは、ケーキを食べている」 and 「ケーキは、アリスが食べている」are valid "topicalizations" of the
sentence, with the former having more emphasis on the action of eating cake
and the latter on Alice of all people eating the cake. Notice how by both
**changing the word order** and **changing what sentence element is made the
topic** is what adds some shift in emphasis; merely changing where the topic
is in the sentence doesn't do that.

(Also, this isn't related to the subject at hand, but the location is
generally marked with を when using the verb 歩く; in Japanese, the locations is
though of as a thing that is walked, in the same vein as "walking the plank"
in English.)


CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-06-15T21:23:02.800
78043
2020-06-15T22:42:22.760
2020-06-15T22:42:22.760
33943
33943
78039
answer