89041


敷島の日本の国に人二人有りとし思はば何か歎かむ is always translated into modern Japanese as some
variation of 大和の国にあなたが二人いると思えたら何かを嘆こう and I'm wondering why is 思はば translated
as 思えたら. Why not 思ったら? -aば is the conditional form right? What's the
difference?


CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-08-24T04:50:38.567
89030
2021-08-25T04:40:29.637
2021-08-25T02:46:36.310
5010
43968
question
meaning classical-japanese poetry
What is the difference in nuance between 思ったら and 思えたら?


思える is 可能動詞(potential verb). It means "can think".

The nai-form of godan inflectional paradigm verb + れる(auxiliary that means
"potential") changes to potential verb.

For example, the nai-form of godan inflectional paradigm verb 読む is 読ま(ない). 読ま
+ れる`changes to a potential verb 読める, which means "can read".

Source:<https://www.kokugobunpou.com/%E7%94%A8%E8%A8%80/%E5%8B%95%E8%A9%9E-10-%E5%8F%AF%E8%83%BD%E5%8B%95%E8%A9%9E/#gsc.tab=0>


CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-08-24T09:02:37.800
89034
2021-08-24T09:02:37.800
7320
89030
answer


You are correct that 思はば in classical Japanese is basically a plain
conditional ("if I think"). However, in this context, it has a mood of
**counterfactual** assumption ("if I were to think...", "if only I could
think..."). The author was in despair because there was only one あなた in
reality. The Japanese language does not have a direct equivalent of
[counterfactual
subjunctive](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Counterfactual_conditional) in
English, and the simplest way to explicitly express this counterfactual mood
in modern Japanese is 思えたら or 思えるなら. あなたが二人いると思ったら without のに would sound like
the author actually started to believe there is another あなた ("now that I think
there are two _anata_...").

This 何か歎かむ is a rhetorical question ("what will I grieve about?" → "I won't
grieve about anything"), so its modern literal translation should be 何を嘆こう,
not 何 **か** を嘆こう.

**EDIT:** I think it's possible to use 思ったら in combination with のに to
translate this waka into modern Japanese (あなたが二人いると思ったら何も嘆かない(でいい) **のに** ),
but then the rhetorical question part would have to be less literal.


CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-08-25T02:40:01.107
89041
2021-08-25T04:40:29.637
2021-08-25T04:40:29.637
5010
5010
89030
answer