4733


> これが私の手紙に対する彼の返事だ。 This is his answer to my letter.
>
> 自分の中の彼に対する気持ちをどう表現していいのか分からないの。I don’t know how to express how I really feel
> to him.
>
> 彼に対して、彼を好きという私の気持ちを、どう表せばいいか、わからない。 I don't know how to express to him that
> I like him.

Often when I run into 対する in colloquial sentences like these, its meaning
appears somewhat extraneous. It seems to emphasize the direction of the action
in an obvious way. I am tempted (mistakenly?) to think that in these kind of
sentences, the meaning expressed could be sufficiently communicated with just
に. Is 対する just adding extra emphasis, or I am I misunderstanding some of its
meaning or grammatical purpose? How does it add to what is being communicated?
Does it add a measure of gravity to the statement?

For instance, if I was to remove the 対する, would these sentences become
grammatically incorrect, or would the meaning drastically change? Perhaps they
just start to sound unnatural or poorly constructed...

If you see any mistakes in translation feel free to point them out. Thank you.

> これが私の手紙に彼の返事だ。
>
> 自分の中の彼に気持ちをどう表現していいのか分からないの。
>
> 彼に、彼を好きという私の気持ちを、どう表せばいいか、わからない。


CC BY-SA 3.0
2012-02-19T17:32:40.000
4730
2012-02-19T19:57:02.673
2020-06-17T08:18:27.500
-1
706
question
grammar
understanding 対する


Contrary to your guess, the last example is fine without 対して whereas it is
ungrammatical to omit 対する in the first two example. (I would say 彼が好き instead
of 彼を好き in the last example, but that is not the main point of the question.)

The important rule here is that the case particles other than の cannot
directly modify a noun. これが私の手紙に彼の返事だ is ungrammatical because 私の手紙に cannot
modify 返事. Similarly, 自分の中の彼に気持ちをどう表現していいのか分からないの ~~is ungrammatical~~ does
not mean what you want it to mean because 彼に cannot modify 気持ち. (The latter
sentence means something like “I do not know how to tell my feelings to ‘him
inside me’” because it is parsed as [自分の中の彼に][気持ちを][どう]表現していいのか分からないの where
each of the three bracketed parts modifies 表現して. This is a totally different
structure than that of the original sentence.)

[対する](http://dic.yahoo.co.jp/dsearch?enc=UTF-8&p=%E5%AF%BE%E3%81%99%E3%82%8B&dtype=0&dname=0ss&stype=0&pagenum=1&index=111786900000)
has many meanings. When it signifies a target of an action, に対して is almost
synonymous to just に. The only difference I can think of is that に対して can put
more emphasis on the target than に.


CC BY-SA 3.0
2012-02-19T18:36:59.467
4732
2012-02-19T19:15:14.333
2012-02-19T19:15:14.333
15
15
4730
answer


As Tsuyoshi Ito answers, when you modify a noun, you can put a genitive
(の)-marked noun phrase, or a relative clause. Notice that `対する` retains the
morphological form of a verb (although it does not fully inflect as with real
verbs). Thus, at least etymologically, you can consider the `対する`-phrase as a
relative clause.

> [(それが)手紙に **対する** (ところの)]返事  
>  'a response [such that it **aims** against the letter]'  
>  'a response that is aimed against the letter'

Here, the `に` phrase is an argument of the verb `対する`. You cannot omit the
verb and retain its argument. The `(それが)手紙に` in the following will be a
strange syntactic object; it has an argument but not the predicate, and is
still intended to function as a relative clause. That is why it is
ungrammatical.

> * [ **(それが)手紙に** ](ところの)返事

If you want to say it short, you can use `へ` in front of the genitive case
like this:

> ? 手紙 **への** 彼の返事  
>  自分の中の彼 **への** 気持ち

although the first example is awkward because `へ` can be used only against
things that will be affected by the action.

In your last example, the `に`-phrase simply functions as an argument.

> 彼 **に** 気持ちをどう表すか


CC BY-SA 3.0
2012-02-19T19:51:40.947
4733
2012-02-19T19:57:02.673
2012-02-19T19:57:02.673
4730
answer