

In episode 6 Staz almost unleashed a Kamehameha attack.  
Is it okay to use this move outside of the Dragon ball series? If Staz did
unleash this Kamehameha, Would it be considerd copyright infringement?


CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-02-13T13:39:51.703
7489
2014-02-13T23:04:36.900
2014-02-13T14:07:45.010
1458
85
question
anime-production blood-lad
Did Staz's have to stop his Kamehameha?


Taking in to consideration that Blood Lad makes use of allot of parody (only
in that one episode almost all of his finishing/attack moves are derived from
other anime/games)

Following the policy of FUNimation

> **Legal**
>
> _May I create new content using FUNimation properties?_
>
> Taking an artwork into a new medium such as 3D animation and/or creating fan
> fiction based on an existing artwork usually does not fall under Fair Use.
> For more on fair use, please see this Wikipedia entry:
> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_use>
>
> Such works are generally considered “derivative works” and the right to
> create such works is one of the exclusive rights of a copyright holder. 17
> USC § 106(2)
>
> If someone creates a derivative work without authorization from the
> copyright holder, they can be liable for copyright infringement. Whether we
> will seek to go after them or not, is another story...
>
> **Fair use**
>
> Fair use is a limitation and exception to the exclusive right granted by
> copyright law to the author of a creative work. In United States copyright
> law, fair use is a doctrine that permits limited use of copyrighted material
> without acquiring permission from the rights holders. Examples of fair use
> include commentary, search engines, criticism, parody, news reporting,
> research, teaching, library archiving and scholarship. It provides for the
> legal, unlicensed citation or incorporation of copyrighted material in
> another author's work under a four-factor balancing test.

Taking these rules in to consideration it would most likely mean that if he
finished the Kamehameha he would indeed have gone beyond the point of fair
use, and into the area of copyright infrigment.

**EDIT**

As for the Japanese copyrights. They indeed seem to be quiet different yet
comes down to pretty much the same in rough lines [(can read them
here)](http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/list/?re=02&dn=1&x=66&y=18&x=0&y=0&ky=copyright&co=1&ia=03&yo=&gn=&sy=&ht=&no=&bu=&ta=)
And a modifyd fair use law seems to be in place aswell, which is more similar
the Korean version then to the english version.


CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-02-13T20:16:26.143
7492
2014-02-13T23:04:36.900
2014-02-13T23:04:36.900
1458
1458
7489
answer