42111


When Ed "kills" Pride, a tiny baby pops out. When we see him 2 years later, it
appears he has a nipple in the middle of his forehead.

Why?

![the "nipple" on Selim's forehead](https://i.stack.imgur.com/25pzdl.jpg)


CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-12-07T00:08:01.670
37727
2018-03-14T07:15:18.163
2018-03-14T04:58:46.567
2516
question
fullmetal-alchemist-series fullmetal-alchemist-brotherhood fullmetal-alchemist-manga
Why does Selim Bradley have a nipple on his forehead?


The mark on Selim's forehead was already present when Edward had reduced him
to his true form in chapter 106.

[![Selim's true
form](https://i.stack.imgur.com/GLsBkm.jpg)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/GLsBkm.jpg)

The mark does not appear to be visible on his forehead prior to his
destruction: for instance, compare these instances of Selim's face in [ch.
70](https://i.stack.imgur.com/YD3sfm.png) to that in [ch.
108](https://i.stack.imgur.com/actPAm.jpg), post-Promised Day.

The most likely explanation is that this has the same function as the
ouroboros tattoos of the other homunculi, since each is meant to have one
somewhere on its body, and we see no other markings on Pride's true form. Note
however that unlike with the other homunculi, this mark is not actually the
ouroboros symbol.

Why is the mark only visible after Pride is destroyed? Selim Bradley's body is
really a shell. We see Selim's face start to disintegrate up in ch. 104, after
he fights with Edward, and in ch. 106, he states that the "container" that
Father gave him is breaking up. There would be no reason for such a container
to have the mark, particularly when it might arouse the interest of others.


CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-01-05T07:31:31.887
38276
2017-01-05T09:11:27.260
2017-01-05T09:11:27.260
2604
2604
37727
answer


### It's another mark commonly worn by homunculi.

This a remnant from Selim being a homunculus. The **ouroboros** tattoo is a
recurring mark of a homunculus, but there are other common themes that at
least _some_ homunculi share.

Look for the **red lines and circles** , most notably found on Sloth,
Gluttony, Lust, Envy (only in his true form) and Greed (when he has his shield
up).

[![the
homunculus](https://i.stack.imgur.com/CtrS3l.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/CtrS3.png)

[![ouroboros tattoo
1](https://i.stack.imgur.com/FRt55m.jpg)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/FRt55.jpg)
[![ouroboros tattoo
2](https://i.stack.imgur.com/VDTyzm.jpg)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/VDTyz.jpg)

The "nipple" you see on Selim's forehead is a continuation of this same mark.
The tiny baby already had this mark:

[![Baby
Selim](https://i.stack.imgur.com/GLsBkm.jpg)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/GLsBkm.jpg)

The "old" Selim (the one who was destroyed) wasn't the actual homunculus. It
was a container ( **the true homunculus was the little baby** ).

### Why don't all the homunculi have these marks?

Well, first of all, these marks are never explicitly mentioned (at least not
in the shows, I haven't read the manga) and not plot relevant. Therefore, it's
possible that these are not _required_ , but rather a design choice (or a
consequence from their creation)

Or maybe Father managed to improve his later homunculi so that they don't need
the mark anymore, though GreedLing still has the red marks and he is the
newest addition.

There are two homunculi who actually bear the marks, but are able to hide
them:

  * (as per the other answer) **Pride** (Selim as we initially meet him) is nothing but a **container** for the true homunculus (the tiny baby which later grows up to be "nipple Selim"). Since the baby survived when the shell died, that proves that the container is not connected to the homunculus itself, and therefore the container does not need these marks.
  * **Envy** is a shapeshifter, thus he is able to hide the marks by choosing his humanlike form. Since the big green monster is considered his true form, that means that his humanlike appearance is his own preference. Note that Envy's headband still carries a similar mark, so that means he **chooses** to display the mark though not on his body as a tattoo. This strongly suggests that the mark itself is optional (but preferred).

So actually, there is only **one homunculus** who does not have the mark:
**Wrath** (Bradley). But Wrath is also unique in other ways, e.g. the only
homunculus that ages. It stands to reason that there is a very good reason for
Wrath to hide his homunculus marks: because he is a **deep agent** who needs
to stay anonymous.

So there are two possibilities here:

  * **All** homunculi have this mark (in different forms), we simply haven't seen Wrath's. Maybe it was under his clothes, we never see him naked or even undressed.
  * **All** homunculi except Wrath have this mark. Wrath is a specially designed homunculus in many ways (he ages too), so it's not impossible that his mark was hidden because he needed to go undercover as the Fuhrer.


CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-09-01T15:03:34.000
42111
2018-03-14T07:15:18.163
2018-03-14T07:15:18.163
2516
34778
37727
answer