

Near the end of episode 5 of Kantai Collection, Kaga said that a fleet of two
aircraft carriers ([
_Kaga_](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_aircraft_carrier_Kaga) and
[_Zuikaku_](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_aircraft_carrier_Zuikaku)),
two torpedo cruisers ([
_Kitakami_](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_cruiser_Kitakami) and
[_Ooi_](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_cruiser_%C5%8Ci)), one
battleship ([
_Kongo_](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_battleship_Kong%C5%8D)) and one
destroyer ([
_Fubuki_](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_destroyer_Fubuki_%281927%29))
was originally an impossible fleet, so they go along with assigning Fubuki - a
destroyer - to be the flagship of the fleet.

Why is such a fleet an impossible one in the first place?


CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-02-05T15:57:38.083
19148
2017-01-22T16:50:06.300
1398
question
kantai-collection
Why is a fleet of two aircraft carriers, two torpedo cruisers, one battleship and one destroyer an impossible fleet?


If you're willing to impose a certain level of realism on the show, then such
a fleet would indeed be absurd by WWII-era naval warfare standards.

In WWII, the biggest source of firepower for a navy was large ships, primarily
battleships and aircraft carriers. Such ships required a huge amount of
resources to operate - _Kaga_ , _Zuikaku_ , and _Kongou_ each had well over a
thousand personnel on-board. They could be used effectively in a variety of
situations, from naval combat, to blockades, to bombarding enemy troops
anywhere near water.

But, such large ships had a fatal weakness, which had been known since the
19th century: torpedoes. A battleship could easily sink weak enemy boats from
a long distance away. For example, _Kongou_ 's [356 mm
guns](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vickers_14_inch/45_naval_gun) had a maximum
range of 35 km (the effective range was somewhat lower, but still quite far).
However, if the enemy forces had a large number of [small
boats](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torpedo_boat), each armed with torpedoes,
it would be difficult for the battleship to take down all of these with its
relatively slow weaponry. Certainly, it could hit some of them, but with
enough numbers it wouldn't be able to take them all down effectively. Aircraft
carriers fare a bit better in this respect, but they too had to worry about
any sort of armored torpedo-carrying vessel or submarine, and enemy fire could
prevent aircraft from launching or landing, which would basically cripple
their offensive capabilities.

With enough ships, the enemy forces could easily advance to within the
effective range of torpedo fire (which depended on the model of torpedo, but
was around 4-8 km for [one common
torpedo](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_14_torpedo) used by the U.S. Navy).
It would not take long to deal heavy damage to the large ship, possibly even
sinking it. Small enemy vessels (such as cruisers) could also quickly approach
to get in range of their own guns, at which point the main advantage of
battleships and aircraft carriers (long range) is lost. If this seems like a
poor strategy, keep in mind that torpedo boats could be very small (at some
points even converted merchant/fishing vessels were used for this purpose),
and operated by only a few people, yet a small number of them would pose a
serious threat to much larger battleships and aircraft carriers. Thus, the big
ships need some way to deal with smaller ships approaching them too quickly
for the large ship to deal with.

This is the reason destroyers were invented. Destroyers were relatively
heavily armored (given their small size), highly mobile small ships which were
primarily used for short-range tactical combat and to escort larger ships.
While torpedo-boats and other swarms of small ships could out-maneuver large
ships with enough numbers, they weren't a threat if you could intercept them
before they got in firing range and take them out. A destroyer like _Fubuki_
would generally only be used in combat against other naval forces. Their
[medium-caliber
guns](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/12.7_cm/50_Type_3_naval_gun) could still
easily outrange (maximum range of over 18 km) torpedoes, and would be a threat
to approaching cruisers as well. A destroyer only required around 200
personnel, and more than just destroying enemy torpedo boats, they were
generally pretty versatile: they could be used for holding tactical positions,
reconnaissance, torpedoing enemy ships, attacking enemy submarines
(essentially just underwater torpedo boats), and anti-air attacks, depending
on the needs of the mission and the available equipment. Even in the worst
case scenerio that the destroyer sinks, this still buys time for the (much
more important) large ships to escape, fight back, or wait for reinforcements.

Generally, any larger ship during WWII would be escorted by at least one
destroyer. Especially important ships might get more than one destroyer
escort. So, for a fleet of 2 aircraft carriers, one battleship, and 2 light
cruisers ( _Kitakami_ and _Ooi_ are described as torpedo cruisers, but this is
just a type of light cruiser armed primarily with torpedoes), we'd expect at
least 5 or so destroyers, and possibly even more. For a real-life example, the
Japanese fleet at the [Battle of the Eastern
Solomons](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_the_Eastern_Solomons) had the
following numbers, which were reasonably typical for a battle of this size:

  * 3 carriers
  * 1 seaplane tender (essentially a light carrier)
  * 2 battleships
  * 16 cruisers
  * 25 destroyers (more than the above 22 ships combined in raw number)
  * Several smaller/non-combat boats

A fleet of 2 carriers, 1 battleship, 2 cruisers, and 1 destroyer is rather
absurd in comparison; it's putting far too many resources in the large ships,
and not enough into protecting them. A swarm of small ships would pose big
problems for a fleet like this. While such a fleet would have excellent
offensive capability given the number of ships, they wouldn't have especially
good defensive capabilities, and would be an attractive target for enemy
attacks (basically a glass cannon).

In addition, the flagship was the most important ship in any operation. The
commanding officer of the operation was on the flagship, and crippling or
sinking the flagship would not only damage enemy morale, but also their
communications and strategy. Making a ship that was designed to be relatively
expendable, like a destroyer, would be a bad idea. The enemy forces would
likely all target the destroyer, and the fleet would be in serious trouble if
it sank, usually forced to retreat.

Typically, the flagship was one of the largest ships in any given operation,
being difficult to sink, well-defended, and powerful enough to boost the
morale of other ships in the operation. A small ship being the flagship would
probably have problems with respect as well as being an easy target. While
there were a couple cases where a destroyer was used as the flagship for an
operation, these were generally only in cases that the whole fleet consisted
of only destroyers, or when the original flagship was too heavily damaged to
continue (such as in the [Battle of
Guadalcanal](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naval_Battle_of_Guadalcanal)).

* * *

With all that said, none of this really applies very well to the Kancolle
universe, at least in the game. Destroyers had a predominantly tactical,
defensive role, but the game's battle system doesn't do much to emulate this.
In game, most of the advantages of destroyers (evasion and speed) aren't
particularly unique to them; one can replace destroyers with larger ships
without much loss. This _will_ incur larger ammunition and fuel costs, but it
isn't necessarily a bad strategy or one that the enemy forces will have any
way to exploit.

Indeed, once one progresses far enough in the game, even _more_ unbalanced
fleets become commonplace. Later missions require more and more firepower,
which is increasingly hard to meet with weaker ships like destroyers and
cruisers. The game is also generous enough with resources that the fuel and
ammunition consumption become relatively unimportant. Since the number of
ships you can bring to a battle is limited (as are your enemy's, preventing
any kind of swarming strategy), it's often better for high-level missions to
only deploy battleships and carriers. If you're well prepared, it's relatively
rare that such large ships will take any serious damage, and with some
strategy there's essentially no risk of them sinking. If anything, the single
destroyer would be the weak link defensively, and unlike in the real world,
where losing a single destroyer in an otherwise good battle would be seen as a
big victory, in the game you can't afford to throw away experienced destroyers
regularly.

Making the destroyer your flagship would offer it some protection, since in-
game flagships can't be sunk, but if it reaches a heavily damaged level (which
is quite plausible) you'll be forced to retreat. There are other benefits for
the flagship, such as increased leveling and a chance to have attacks hit
other ships instead. There are strategic benefits to both large and small
ships being flagship, but in any case it's not crazy to make a weak ship like
a destroyer the fleet's flagship.

I suspect there's no good in-universe reason to consider this strategy crazy
or impossible, at least based on what we know now about battles in the
Kancolle universe. In the game, it wouldn't really be at all, given the right
circumstances. The anime hasn't presented us with any explanation, and it has
an original story (since the game has almost no story), so we can't really
find any answer there. But in the context of actual WWII-era naval battles, it
would indeed be a crazy, illogical decision to make a fleet like this, and
there are no historical examples of such a fleet.


CC BY-SA 3.0
2015-02-15T07:04:08.457
19374
2015-02-15T07:41:25.857
2015-02-15T07:41:25.857
24
24
19148
answer


I just checked the service record of each of those 6 named ships. And the end
conclusion is that this was a double pun (sorta). They were deemed "impossible
ships some ways or another". And they never served with each other...sorta?.
Which makes the squadron utterly impossible.

## IJN Ooi and IJN Kitakami

> On 12 January 1942, Chief of Staff Rear Admiral Matome Ugaki inspected Ōi,
> and expressed strong disapproval of the Navy's plans for the use of the
> newly remodeled torpedo cruisers and urged a revision to the Navy's tactics.
> While the Imperial Japanese Navy General Staff debated the issue, Ōi was
> assigned to escorting transports between Hiroshima and Mako, Pescadores
> Islands from the end of January through mid-April [1941].

* * *

The end result of which both becoming troop carriers and occasional attachment
to patrols based around the Malaccas'. Rather uneventful career until Ooi was
torpedoed off HK in 44. Kitakami survived and also was converted for Kaiten
suicide operation which was also a botch.

## IJN Zuikaku and IJN Kaga

I think they wanted to use Taihou instead of Zuikaku. Zuikaku was never an
armored carrier (outside of Pearl Harbor 1941 which both, Zuikaku and Kaga,
had participated with and hit different airfields from each other).

Zuikaku was remodeled (in-game) into an armored carrier, [Taihou, the only
armored carrier of her class] blew up when exhaust gases...

Kaga was a part of an experimental program with Akagi, as the losing bet.

> As a result, Akagi and Kaga were given different exhaust systems to evaluate
> in real-world conditions. Kaga's funnel gases were collected in a pair of
> long horizontal ducts which discharged at the rear of each side of the
> flight deck, in spite of predictions by a number of prominent naval
> architects that they would not keep the hot gases away from the flight deck.
> The predictions proved to be correct, not least because Kaga was slower than
> the Akagi which allowed the gases to rise and interfere with landing
> operations. Another drawback was that the heat of the gases made the crew's
> quarters located on the side of the ship by the funnels almost
> uninhabitable.

That and the impractical idea, that should she find herself in a duel with
ships, she was equipped with ten 20 cm/50 3rd Year Type guns. On her second
remodel she was modernized with more and better guns. This was before the
realization that carriers were not meant at all for any gun duels.

* * *

Kaga was part of the 1st CV Div 1 and later the CV Div 2 from 1935 onward.
Sunk 1942 Midway.

Zuikaku was part of CV Div 5 after returning from Pearl Harbor 1941. Served in
Battle of Coral Sea in 1942 with Shoukaku around the same time Midway was
happening.

* * *

## IJN Kongou

Now this one was tough.

Under the 1922-1930 Washington Treaty, Japan was limited to certain
tonnage/armaments limits and certain amounts of capital ships. Kongou exceeded
both of those limits after her remodel from Nov 1929-March 1931 and was a full
battleship. She should not exist according to the treaty that Japan wasn't due
to renounce until 1934.

* * *

Met Zuikaku probably for Operation J as Kongou was mentioned to have escorted
5 fast carriers for capture of Java island (Feb-March 1942), which Zuikaku and
Shoukaku later fought Battle of Coral Sea for Operation Mo (April 1942) in the
same general area.

Escorted Hiryuu, Akagi, and Soryuu in Easter Sunday Raid, Ceylon April 1942,
No Kaga.

Kongou met Zuikaku again June 1944 along with IJN Taihou. But then again like
Pearl. This was a throw together of all mobile surface fleets. As taking the
Mariana Isles would give US land based bombing range of Japanese home islands.
Zuikaku and Taihou lost with all hands after being torpedoe'd by subs after
battle.

Sunk Nov 16 1944 after being torpedoed while en route to Kure with remnants of
1st fleet. (Note the were in separate divisions commanded by a different rear
admirals)

* * *

## IJN Fubuki

11th Destroy Div stationed around Hainan 1941, very active during Malaysia and
Indonesia operations between Dec 1941 and her sinking on 11 Oct 1942. May have
met any of the above ships for one operation or the other...Truly the mystery
as why she would be included.

However she had been the black-sheep for the longest time for a friendly fire
on Feb 29 1942 that saw a spread of torpedoes sinking 1 minesweeper and 3
troop ships, which was later attributed, post war, to the Mogami. Maybe that?
I'm not sure how Japanese language can use the word impossible. But no doubt
the captain refuted that some way or the other.

>> Call me cheap for using Wikipedia, but cross referencing this took around 2
and a half hours. With some conflicting sources that I had to double check via
another source. No, I did not try to outdo the current upvoted. I just wanted
to dig a bit deeper, see if there was any other reason why. I play this game,
and the history does interest me. Whew, I lied when I said it would take 48,
now that's 150 min wasted. BTW in KanColle game a fleet can only have 6 ships.
And there's no objectionable reason why this couldn't happen, it wouldn't be
very good but with some tweaking, maybe a powerful glass cannon.


CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-11-22T16:33:03.063
37469
2017-01-22T16:50:06.300
2017-01-22T16:50:06.300
8486
29380
19148
answer