

From what I understand, _kaizoku ou_ translates to 'Pirate King', while
_Yonkou_ translates to the 'Four Emperors'. And _One Piece_ is the only place
where a King is considered above an emperor (I jest)

Can anyone explain the reason for this? Is it simply because Oda had not
planned for the Yonkou when _OP_ has begun Serialization? (Luffy has been
saying he was going to become the pirate king from Chapter 1; and the yonkou
were first mentioned around the Arlong arc)


CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-02-09T07:25:38.073
61871
2021-03-26T18:40:52.207
2021-03-03T20:47:14.003
2516
51983
question
one-piece
In One Piece, why is the pirate 'king' above the four 'emperors'?


Well to my memory there wasn't a Yonkou system/thing when Roger was Pirate
KIng. After he died i think to avoid conflicts about who's the next Pirate
King, the navy or they themselves declared(most probably navy) Yonkou as the
next most probable Strongest Pirates.


CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-02-14T09:08:14.203
61916
2021-02-14T09:08:14.203
58845
61871
answer


There was no system like Yonko in Old Pirate Era and one of the current yonko
was in Roger's crew So to avoid the conflict who is the next pirate king, they
all were declared Yonko.


CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-02-17T08:05:23.523
61943
2021-03-04T13:30:53.007
2021-03-04T13:30:53.007
59210
52367
61871
answer


> Is it simply because Oda had not planned for the Yonkou when OP has begun
> Serialization?

I don't think this is the case. Knowing how Oda generally works, with all his
foreshadowing, I am pretty sure the Yonkou were not an afterthought. (69
chapters between Luffy's 'I will be Pirate King' and Arlong Park is not really
a long period of time for OP.)

@Taladris put it well in the comments. Much of it has to do with the fact that
the Four Emperors simply are more like literal emperors, controlling large
empires and so on. Also important to note the sort of quasi-bureaucratic
connotation that the term holds. Not saying that negotiations occur between
them, but the Yonkou form one very vital pillar of the [Three Great
Powers](https://onepiece.fandom.com/wiki/Three_Great_Powers), which has been
crucial to the balance of power in the current world (and is something that
the heads of the World Government worry much over).

On the other hand, Roger was an absolute wild 'un who surpassed all of his
contemporaries through his astounding feats, such as discovering the final
island on the Grand Line. There simply wasn't anyone with equal footing (keep
in mind, we are not talking about power levels and strength/calibre here, but
rather in terms of accomplishments, which was mostly what permeated to the far
corners of the world; there was no one comparable). Moreover, his epithet
'Pirate King' wasn't conferred to him by the World Government or some other
authority figure. It was a unanimous recognition of his greatness by the world
as a whole and especially among the commonfolk, a vast majority of which all
had dreams of their own and were deeply moved and inspired by Roger's
adventures. Thus, to the better part of the world Roger was an idol and hero,
one who had reached the zenith. There was no question of 'above'.

I don't have evidence but I am pretty sure 'Four Emperors' was propagated
_not_ by layfolk but rather by one of the authority figures (Marines?). That's
why 'Pirate King' is a much more colloquial and endearing term than 'Four
Emperors' which seems to be more bureaucratic, and why 'king' and 'emperor'
are not measured on the same scale in this case. 'Four Emperors' does not
evoke the same emotions in people's hearts that 'Pirate King (Gol **D.**
Roger)' does!

It was _not_ an issue of deciding who the next Pirate King was--the four did
not decide to settle on a collective epithet instead of aiming to be the
greatest among themselves, and more importantly, I don't think they gave
themselves the title.


CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-03-26T18:40:52.207
62309
2021-03-26T18:40:52.207
59558
61871
answer