142


As anyone who has seen Lucky Star will remember, most of the references to
other anime and manga are censored. The most obvious examples of this are
references to Gundam or Sgt. Frog (both of which are notably Sunrise shows).
Presumably this is done to avoid KyoAni getting sued. This also explains why
references to Haruhi and Full Metal Panic weren't censored (as far as I
remember). Interestingly these instances of censorship probably could have
been removed in the English release since it was licensed by Bandai, but I
don't know if they actually were, so this question might only apply to the
Japanese version.

However, there are still a few cases of references which weren't censored
despite no obvious connection between the Lucky Star team and the source. The
one that immediately comes to mind is To Heart, which is referenced several
times. To Heart is associated with VN studio Leaf as well as animation studios
Oriental Light and Magic and AIC, neither of which have anything to do with
Lucky Star (KyoAni and Kadokawa). I can't find any connections between them,
but of course that could be oversight on my part, and I didn't check all of
the individual staff members.

Is there some connection that I missed? Barring that, what sort of policy
would a studio typically use for references like this? Would they try to
obtain permission for all of the references, or just bleep the ones that seem
risky to them?


CC BY-SA 3.0
2012-12-11T21:23:45.537
35
2018-12-18T01:59:08.167
24
question
lucky-star
Why are only some of the references censored in Lucky Star


A major concern might be whether they has consent from the references'
company.

An example would be **Ore no Imouto ga Konna ni Kawaii Wake ga Nai** , they
show some vender's H-GAME cover in Kirino's H-Game pill, which have offended
those companies and the production studio later apologized. (If I remember
correctly)

## Updated: 2013/12/26

I found something interested when investigating a recent news, I'm not sure
it's relevant or not though)

<http://www.itmedia.co.jp/news/articles/1312/20/news095.html> (Japanese):

A recent episode of **Yuri Danshi** in Japan was said to infringe the
copyright of some manga. (Hidamari Sketch, A Channel, Golden Mosaic)

![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/wWDBf.jpg) I thought
this should be in the range of fair use (just like quoting sentences from
another book), after checking "Fair use" the Japanese Wikipedia, it turns out
"Fair use" doesn't exists in Japan's copyright laws. You must have consent
from the author.


CC BY-SA 3.0
2012-12-12T03:30:43.083
141
2015-06-25T13:37:59.167
2015-06-25T13:37:59.167
91
106
35
answer


Not sure if this is just a random connection or actually the reason, but
here's the connection between Lucky Star and ToHeart:

Lucky Star's manga and anime are published by different branches of Kadokawa.
The ToHeart manga was published by MediaWorks which was owned by, you guessed
it, Kadokawa.

I don't know if every single branch of Kadokawa is allowed to mention a work
in every other branch, but there is at least this connection. If someone
bought Lucky Star DVDs and saw ToHeart mentioned and then decided to go buy
the ToHeart manga, that's a double win for Kadokawa.


CC BY-SA 3.0
2012-12-12T04:18:53.117
142
2012-12-12T04:18:53.117
107
35
answer


Mainly due to copyright reasons and the animes not belonging to the animation
studio.

If they decided to un-blur them they would have to give copyright claim for
all of them or get permission from other companies.


CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-12-18T01:59:08.167
50125
2018-12-18T01:59:08.167
43938
35
answer