Is 仕方 a particular case of the pattern V連用形 + 方?


There is a pattern to express the way of doing things. First comes a verb in
the 連用形 form, and after that comes the word 方{かた}. For example:

> 食べ + 方 → 食べ方 (the way of eating)

> 読み + 方 → 読み方 (the way of reading)

Given that the 連用形 of the verb する (to do) is し, it seems reasonable to think
of しかた as another example of the same rule:

> し + 方 → し方 (the way [of doing] )

However, there's a problem: the kanji spelling for the word しかた is 仕方, but the
[right kanji for the verb する is
為](https://jisho.org/search/%E3%81%99%E3%82%8B), and **not** 仕 (the word is
spelled in hiragana virtually always).

For this reason, I'm not so sure whether 仕方 is an actual instance of the
aforementioned rule or not. Which is the case? Maybe there's an etymological
relationship between the pattern and the word 仕方, but it eventually became a
word in its own right?




仕方 is indeed し方. 仕 is an [_ateji_](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ateji). The
word looks more like a noun in its own right with a Chinese character at the
beginning than otherwise.

I don’t know how this particular character came to be used for し, but it is
also used for the ます-stem of する in other words, such as:

  * [仕事]{しごと}
  * [仕様]{しよう} (しょうがない is a contraction of し様がない)
  * [仕合]{しあい} (more commonly written 試合)
  * [仕業]{しわざ}
  * [仕草]{しぐさ}
  * [仕組]{しく}み
  * [仕切]{しき}る




仕方 is indeed し方. 仕 is an [_ateji_](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ateji). The
word looks more like a noun in its own right with a Chinese character at the
beginning than otherwise.

I don’t know how this particular character came to be used for し, but it is
also used for the ます-stem of する in other words, such as:

  * [仕事]{しごと}
  * [仕様]{しよう} (しょうがない is a contraction of し様がない)
  * [仕合]{しあい} (more commonly written 試合)
  * [仕業]{しわざ}
  * [仕草]{しぐさ}
  * [仕組]{しく}み
  * [仕切]{しき}る

