Indicating a subject and objective thoughts of inevitability


How do the Japanese show the nuance between the inevitable outcomes of actions
based on their thoughts versus their findings?

After the Tsunami of 2011, Japanese Volcanologists predict an inevitable
eruption (due to the tsunami).

**２０１１年の津波の後で、日本の火山学の博士が、富士山はずっと爆発します。**

Unfortunately I believe that my (incorrectly written) attempt fails to show
that its due to their research that they believe the outcome will occur.




I think you're looking for:

  * ～[ことになる](http://jisho.org/search/%E3%81%93%E3%81%A8%E3%81%AB%E3%81%AA%E3%82%8B)だろう (A handy combination, "... will end up ～". Add 必ず, 確実に or 間違いなく to increase certainty)
  * ～(こと)は避けられないだろう (more explicit "... is inevitable")
  * ～(こと)は[不可避](http://jisho.org/word/%E4%B8%8D%E5%8F%AF%E9%81%BF)だろう (more rigid than 避けられない)

ずっと is "always", not "certainly". Volcanic eruption is usually 噴火.

For example

>   * 富士山の噴火は避けられないだろう。
>   * 2011年の津波によって富士山は間違いなく噴火することになるだろう。
>




I think you're looking for:

  * ～[ことになる](http://jisho.org/search/%E3%81%93%E3%81%A8%E3%81%AB%E3%81%AA%E3%82%8B)だろう (A handy combination, "... will end up ～". Add 必ず, 確実に or 間違いなく to increase certainty)
  * ～(こと)は避けられないだろう (more explicit "... is inevitable")
  * ～(こと)は[不可避](http://jisho.org/word/%E4%B8%8D%E5%8F%AF%E9%81%BF)だろう (more rigid than 避けられない)

ずっと is "always", not "certainly". Volcanic eruption is usually 噴火.

For example

>   * 富士山の噴火は避けられないだろう。
>   * 2011年の津波によって富士山は間違いなく噴火することになるだろう。
>

