Understanding this third person narration


The large majority of the stuff I've read (in Japanese) where there is
narration has normally used first person. However in some cases (e.g. in the
below) there are parts in works that are third person narrated where I am
unsure of how understand it.

In the below the the non bolded part is clearly narrated by an 'omniscient
narrator'. However, the next part is a bit more unclear for me.

>
> 思いがけない接近に、美唯は驚きと恥ずかしさで固まってしまっている。どこかを痛めた様子はなく、誠は内心で胸を撫で下ろした。安心した途端、先ほど感じた愛おしさが再び心を満たしてゆくのを、誠は心地良く受け止めていた。これが一時の迷いなどではなく、本物の気持ちだと分かったからだ。
> **改めて近くで見る美唯は綺麗だった。初めて見た時も綺麗だと思ったが、今もその感想は変わらない。けれど、外見だけだったら、こんなにも心を惹かれなかっただろうとも、同時に思う。この美しさは、美唯だからこそ、感じるのだ。**

Whilst I could be wrong, the bolded part reads more like it is being told by 誠
rather than by the previous narrator. So I guess my question is, is this
actually being 'said' by 誠, or is the narrator from the previous part telling
us 誠's thoughts and feelings?




First, please double-check the terminology. It appears to me that the non-
bolded part is written in the **third** person's point of view, and the bolded
part is in the **first** person's point of view. The narrator is a "third
person". So this passage has a temporary shift from the **third** person's
view to the **first** person's view.

Next, the bolded part is essentially "a quote without explicit quotation
marks". This is common also in the English literature (known as [free indirect
speech](https://www.myenglishpages.com/english/grammar-lesson-free-indirect-
speech.php) or free direct speech). In English, you can distinguish free
indirect speech and free direct speech just by seeing if the subject is "he"
or "I". In other words, you can tell the "point of view" of the sentence by
looking at the subject.

In Japanese, however, such a subject is normally omitted. In your case, the
sentence says neither 彼は思う nor 俺は思う, so the borderline between direct and
indirect is blurry. But when this technique is employed, the borderline is
made blurry almost intentionally, so you should not worry about it too much.
Either way, this sentence has the character's own voice inserted in the
narrative part, which makes this sentence more dramatic.

For example, I think this can be translated into English in two ways:

> けれど、外見だけだったら、こんなにも心を惹かれなかっただろうとも、同時に思う。
>
>   * But at the same time, I know that I wouldn't have been so attracted to
> her if it had been just her appearance. (free direct speech)
>   * But at the same time, he knew that he wouldn't have been so attracted to
> her if it had been just her appearance. (free indirect speech)
>




First, please double-check the terminology. It appears to me that the non-
bolded part is written in the **third** person's point of view, and the bolded
part is in the **first** person's point of view. The narrator is a "third
person". So this passage has a temporary shift from the **third** person's
view to the **first** person's view.

Next, the bolded part is essentially "a quote without explicit quotation
marks". This is common also in the English literature (known as [free indirect
speech](https://www.myenglishpages.com/english/grammar-lesson-free-indirect-
speech.php) or free direct speech). In English, you can distinguish free
indirect speech and free direct speech just by seeing if the subject is "he"
or "I". In other words, you can tell the "point of view" of the sentence by
looking at the subject.

In Japanese, however, such a subject is normally omitted. In your case, the
sentence says neither 彼は思う nor 俺は思う, so the borderline between direct and
indirect is blurry. But when this technique is employed, the borderline is
made blurry almost intentionally, so you should not worry about it too much.
Either way, this sentence has the character's own voice inserted in the
narrative part, which makes this sentence more dramatic.

For example, I think this can be translated into English in two ways:

> けれど、外見だけだったら、こんなにも心を惹かれなかっただろうとも、同時に思う。
>
>   * But at the same time, I know that I wouldn't have been so attracted to
> her if it had been just her appearance. (free direct speech)
>   * But at the same time, he knew that he wouldn't have been so attracted to
> her if it had been just her appearance. (free indirect speech)
>

