Negative adjectives + です vs adjective + ではありません


For example, to translate :

> This dog is not cute.

We can use :

> この犬{いぬ}は可愛{かわい}くないです。

or :

> この犬{いぬ}は可愛{かわい}いではありません。

Is there a difference between those two sentences? Are there conditions to use
the former instead of the latter, or vice versa?




The first sentence is correct and the second one is not correct. That is
because, 可愛い is so-called 形容詞 (i-adjective). The second type of conjugation is
correct for 形容動詞(na-adjective), but not for 形容詞.

○：この犬は可愛くないです。 ×：この犬は可愛いではありません。

Instead,きれいだ is 形容動詞(na-adjective), so the second type of conjugation fits in.

×：彼女はきれいくないです。 ○：彼女はきれいではありません。

You may notice, you can replace na-adjectives with nouns and still the same
conjugation holds.

×：彼女は学生くないです。 ○：彼女は学生ではありません。

Roughly speaking, older words are classified into 形容詞 (the first expression)
and therefore it conjugates more naturally as adjectives, and newer words
形容動詞(the second expression) are sort of more clumsy, so it nearly conjugates
as just nouns. (although there are exceptions as in most grammatical rules)

related posts: [大きじゃない vs
大きくない？](https://japanese.stackexchange.com/questions/21512/%E5%A4%A7%E3%81%8D%E3%81%98%E3%82%83%E3%81%AA%E3%81%84-vs-%E5%A4%A7%E3%81%8D%E3%81%8F%E3%81%AA%E3%81%84/21539#21539)
[Why does Japanese have two kinds of adjectives? (-i adjectives and -na
adjectives)](https://japanese.stackexchange.com/questions/1008/why-does-
japanese-have-two-kinds-of-adjectives-i-adjectives-and-na-adjective)^




The first sentence is correct and the second one is not correct. That is
because, 可愛い is so-called 形容詞 (i-adjective). The second type of conjugation is
correct for 形容動詞(na-adjective), but not for 形容詞.

○：この犬は可愛くないです。 ×：この犬は可愛いではありません。

Instead,きれいだ is 形容動詞(na-adjective), so the second type of conjugation fits in.

×：彼女はきれいくないです。 ○：彼女はきれいではありません。

You may notice, you can replace na-adjectives with nouns and still the same
conjugation holds.

×：彼女は学生くないです。 ○：彼女は学生ではありません。

Roughly speaking, older words are classified into 形容詞 (the first expression)
and therefore it conjugates more naturally as adjectives, and newer words
形容動詞(the second expression) are sort of more clumsy, so it nearly conjugates
as just nouns. (although there are exceptions as in most grammatical rules)

related posts: [大きじゃない vs
大きくない？](https://japanese.stackexchange.com/questions/21512/%E5%A4%A7%E3%81%8D%E3%81%98%E3%82%83%E3%81%AA%E3%81%84-vs-%E5%A4%A7%E3%81%8D%E3%81%8F%E3%81%AA%E3%81%84/21539#21539)
[Why does Japanese have two kinds of adjectives? (-i adjectives and -na
adjectives)](https://japanese.stackexchange.com/questions/1008/why-does-
japanese-have-two-kinds-of-adjectives-i-adjectives-and-na-adjective)^

