Japanese sentence


授業中に出題したレポート課題の提出内容で評価していきます. -> the teacher will evaluate based on the
homework that i will upload during the lessons. Or homework that the teacher
give during the lessons, and i upload it at home?




Although "Ask the teacherTM" is the best option (do so, really), I believe the
following is the preferred interpretation of the given sentence.

> 授業中に出題したレポート課題の提出内容で評価していきます.

You'll be evaluated based on your 「提出内容」for the「[授業中に出題した]レポート課題」. So the
homework will be given during the lessons, and whether you submit your
assignment in-class or afterwards is not specified. In this case, 授業中に
modifies the 出題-する, and 出題 is for giving questions (not for submission).

> レポート課題の授業中の提出内容で評価していきます

will correspond to your first interpretation.

> 授業中に出したレポート課題の提出内容で評価していきます

Here I changed the 出題する to 出す, which can be substituted for either 出題 or 提出
(submission). In this case it's more ambiguous whether 「授業中に出した」 modifies
レポート課題 or 提出(内容). I think the former is still preferred because of the
location (and context), and

> レポート課題の授業中に出した提出内容で評価していきます

is slightly unnatural but can only be understood with the latter (you submit
during the lessons).

Another tricky, unlikely but not-impossible interpretation is

> 授業中に，出題したレポート課題の提出内容で評価していきます.

where 授業中に modifies 評価する: "I shall evaluate you during the classes, based on
your submission for the assignments."




Although "Ask the teacherTM" is the best option (do so, really), I believe the
following is the preferred interpretation of the given sentence.

> 授業中に出題したレポート課題の提出内容で評価していきます.

You'll be evaluated based on your 「提出内容」for the「[授業中に出題した]レポート課題」. So the
homework will be given during the lessons, and whether you submit your
assignment in-class or afterwards is not specified. In this case, 授業中に
modifies the 出題-する, and 出題 is for giving questions (not for submission).

> レポート課題の授業中の提出内容で評価していきます

will correspond to your first interpretation.

> 授業中に出したレポート課題の提出内容で評価していきます

Here I changed the 出題する to 出す, which can be substituted for either 出題 or 提出
(submission). In this case it's more ambiguous whether 「授業中に出した」 modifies
レポート課題 or 提出(内容). I think the former is still preferred because of the
location (and context), and

> レポート課題の授業中に出した提出内容で評価していきます

is slightly unnatural but can only be understood with the latter (you submit
during the lessons).

Another tricky, unlikely but not-impossible interpretation is

> 授業中に，出題したレポート課題の提出内容で評価していきます.

where 授業中に modifies 評価する: "I shall evaluate you during the classes, based on
your submission for the assignments."

