動作 as opposed to 作用


The linguistics text I’m reading has a sentence with this fragment:
「動詞の表す動作・作用が[…]」。 Consulting dictionaries just made me more confused; what’s
the contrast between the two in this context? “Action” vs. “effect”?




動詞 in Japanese can represent 3 different things, 動作、作用 and 存在. An example will
be easier to understand.

[code]

    動作：
    道を歩く
    
[/code]

歩く is categorized as 動作をあらわす動詞, because when you walk, you move your legs, in
other words "movement" or "action".

[code]

    作用：
    壁に絵をかける
    
[/code]

かける is categorized as 作用を表す動詞, here 壁にかける is having an "effect" on the wall.

[code]

    存在：
    机に本がある
    
[/code]

ある is categorized as 存在を表す動詞, here ある indicates "existence".

So back to your question, "動作" doesn't directly place any influence on other
"things" whereas "作用" directly "effects" other things.




動詞 in Japanese can represent 3 different things, 動作、作用 and 存在. An example will
be easier to understand.

[code]

    動作：
    道を歩く
    
[/code]

歩く is categorized as 動作をあらわす動詞, because when you walk, you move your legs, in
other words "movement" or "action".

[code]

    作用：
    壁に絵をかける
    
[/code]

かける is categorized as 作用を表す動詞, here 壁にかける is having an "effect" on the wall.

[code]

    存在：
    机に本がある
    
[/code]

ある is categorized as 存在を表す動詞, here ある indicates "existence".

So back to your question, "動作" doesn't directly place any influence on other
"things" whereas "作用" directly "effects" other things.

