Will expression retain the same definition if particle is changed?


> 「ここにじっとしていてもしょうがない………か」

> 自分を奮い立たせるために、わざと自分の考え **を声に出し** 行動を始めた。

I came across the expression 声を出す on jisho.org. I don't know if replacing the
expression's を with に (because を is already used earlier in the sentence) will
allow me to use the 声を出す definition when translating. Is this allowed?




声を出す cannot take another object because 声 itself is the object of this
transitive verb. What is said as a word is not important.

声に出す is an "incomplete" expression because it lacks a direct object. It should
be preceded by an object or a quotative-と to show the content of the speech.
声に itself is like an adverbial expression "as (physical) voice" or "aloud".

>   * 彼は謝罪の言葉を声に出した。
>   * 「ありがとう」と声に出して言いなさい。
>

See this question for more examples: [What does "声が出る"
mean?](https://japanese.stackexchange.com/q/19255/5010)




声を出す cannot take another object because 声 itself is the object of this
transitive verb. What is said as a word is not important.

声に出す is an "incomplete" expression because it lacks a direct object. It should
be preceded by an object or a quotative-と to show the content of the speech.
声に itself is like an adverbial expression "as (physical) voice" or "aloud".

>   * 彼は謝罪の言葉を声に出した。
>   * 「ありがとう」と声に出して言いなさい。
>

See this question for more examples: [What does "声が出る"
mean?](https://japanese.stackexchange.com/q/19255/5010)

