委託 vs 託す vs 預ける


So I was studying my kanji when I read this sentence:

> 僕は、有り金をすべて彼に委託した。
>
> I trusted him with all the money I had.

If I changed it to these:

> 僕は、有り金をすべて彼に預けた。
>
> 僕は、有り金をすべて彼に託した。

How will the meaning or nuance change?




> 僕は、有り金をすべて彼に委託した。

委託 is a financial/business term. This means "he" will manage the money on
behalf of you, for a certain purpose, as a professional. If he is a
businessperson, he may invest it to make more money and return the profit to
you. If he is a lawyer, he may distribute the money to your bereaved family.

> 僕は、有り金をすべて彼に預けた。

This means "he" received the money, but he will keep it and eventually return
it to the owner without touching it. The ownership is not transferred.
Normally, people use banks for this purpose, but one may have to do something
like this when a bank is not available for some reason.

> 僕は、有り金をすべて彼に託した。

This is like 委託する, but 託す is not a business term, so "he" does not have to be
a professional. You may do this when you believe he can spend the money more
wisely than you to achieve some goal, or when you know you cannot use it any
more.




> 僕は、有り金をすべて彼に委託した。

委託 is a financial/business term. This means "he" will manage the money on
behalf of you, for a certain purpose, as a professional. If he is a
businessperson, he may invest it to make more money and return the profit to
you. If he is a lawyer, he may distribute the money to your bereaved family.

> 僕は、有り金をすべて彼に預けた。

This means "he" received the money, but he will keep it and eventually return
it to the owner without touching it. The ownership is not transferred.
Normally, people use banks for this purpose, but one may have to do something
like this when a bank is not available for some reason.

> 僕は、有り金をすべて彼に託した。

This is like 委託する, but 託す is not a business term, so "he" does not have to be
a professional. You may do this when you believe he can spend the money more
wisely than you to achieve some goal, or when you know you cannot use it any
more.

