Nominalizing particle combos


I'm curious about the use of certain particles in combination with
nominalizing particles こと and の。I know ことが、のは、etc are acceptable, but can one
use particles such as と or など etc.? For instance, would the following sentence
be grammatically correct or does it sound very strange?

> 喋ることと聞くことより読むことと書くことほうが上手だ。

Is there a better way to express this? Moreover, are ことと or ことなど or のと etc.
acceptable particle combos?

Edit: I realize の should be used for experiential verbs, so maybe the
following sentence is better:

> 喋るのと聞くのより読むのと書くのほうが上手だ。




Your sentence is nearly perfect, but you need の between こと and ほう, because こと
and ほう are both (special) nouns.

> 喋ることと聞くことより読むことと書くこと **の** ほうが上手だ。

(As an aside, you don't necessarily need nominalizers here. より and ほう can
follow the dictionary-form of a verb, so you can say
喋ったり聞いたりするより読んだり書いたりする方が上手だ. [This
question](https://japanese.stackexchange.com/q/29500/5010) is related.)

It's also possible to use nominalizer-の instead of こと, but it sounds less
formal, and the combination of の-and-の (one for nominalization and one for
linking) sounds odd to me.

> [△]喋るのと聞くのより読むのと書く **のの** ほうが上手だ。 (questionable)

ことなど is also an acceptable combination.

> 午前はメールを書くことなどに時間を使った。

