Can this be expressed through an alternate construction


> 新聞に **こんなことが書いてあった** 。最近の日本人は家族みんなで休日にコンピューターゲームを楽しむそうだ。
>
> In the newspapers, the following **is written**. It is said that recently
> the japanese people are enjoying computer games in their spare time with the
> whole family.

What bothers me here is that it is practically impossible to preserve the
active mode of the 書いてあった in the translation. I understand that things are
like that and that I have to accept it, it's just that I guess that I will
tend to use the following construction if I produce japanese myself:

> 新聞にこんなことを書いてあった。 → In the newspapers, **they've** written the following.

or

> 新聞にこんなことが書かれてあった。 → In the newspapers, the following has been written.

Are these constructions understandable or at least still grammatical?

I'm not sure whether my passive -て いる construction is still grammatical from a
morphological or syntactical perspective. I've written it down like that to
have it either confirmed or corrected by you :D




The following articles are related:

  * [ている vs てある in resultant states relating the trans/intransitive verb and が/を](https://japanese.stackexchange.com/q/41614/5010)
  * [「～が～てある」と「～を～てある」はどう違う？](http://www.alc.co.jp/jpn/article/faq/03/67.html)

> 「～てある」には動作の結果としての対象の状態を表す場合があり、このとき対象となる名詞は「が」によってマークされます。
>

>> 壁にポスターが貼ってある。  
>  花瓶に花が生けてある。

The ～が～てある pattern appears with instant state-change (aka punctual),
transitive verbs like 倒す, 落とす, 壊す.

壁にポスター **を** 貼ってある, 木 **を** 倒してある and so on are also perfectly valid Japanese
sentences. But they are fine only when you say this with the the nuance of "in
preparation", "in advance", etc. When you introduce something into [the
universe of discourse](https://japanese.stackexchange.com/q/22/5010) using
this construction, が should be used. (And that's why 彼が殺してある does not mean "He
has been killed"; 彼 should be already in the universe of discourse when this
sentence is made)

新聞にこんなことが書かれてあった is grammatical and understandable, but it's too long and
usually not used.




I'd say both sentences are understandable, but they are not grammatically
correct.

For sentence A, you cannot use を with ある nearly all cases, which include this
case. You have to stay with が (although think that this kind of mistake is
often made by foreigners and Japanese people used to having contact with
Japanese students will understand you just fine).

As for B: As you said yourself, the passive construction is [passive stem]-て
**いる** , not [passive stem]-てある. Replacing あった with いた should do the trick.
Keep in mind, however, that using the normal passive form over the -てある form
changes the meaning slightly. The -てある variant implies that something was done
_by someone intentionally_ , while the normal passive just describes a state,
i.e. the fact might just have appeared in the newspaper _on its own_.

