Difference between だけで and でだけ?


The だけ meaning "only", and で being the "at/in" particle. When saying "only
in/at", does the で come before, or after the だけ? What does it mean, if
anything, when it's reversed?

Example: "You can only get this plush toy in Japan". Is it,

> このぬいぐるみを日本だけで手に入れます。

or

> このぬいぐるみを日本でだけ手に入れます。

Side note: does the same principle apply to しか?




The scope of だけ is different depending on where you put it.

  * このぬいぐるみを((日本だけ)で)手に入れます。- "You can get this plush toy in (only Japan)"
  * このぬいぐるみを((日本で)だけ)手に入れます。- "You can get this plush toy ((in Japan) only)"

Here it does not seem to show a big difference.

Translating from [this source](http://jp.hjenglish.com/new/p12886/):

> ~だけで is typically used to mean "just this method/location/person will be
> necessary to accomplish this task"  
> While ~でだけ means "only by ~, and no other method, will the task be
> accomplished" For example,
>

>> その仕事は二人だけでできます - This job only requires 2 persons. (It doesn't need any
more people)

>>

>> その仕事は二人でだけできます - This job only requires 2 persons. (No more, no less)




The scope of だけ is different depending on where you put it.

  * このぬいぐるみを((日本だけ)で)手に入れます。- "You can get this plush toy in (only Japan)"
  * このぬいぐるみを((日本で)だけ)手に入れます。- "You can get this plush toy ((in Japan) only)"

Here it does not seem to show a big difference.

Translating from [this source](http://jp.hjenglish.com/new/p12886/):

> ~だけで is typically used to mean "just this method/location/person will be
> necessary to accomplish this task"  
> While ~でだけ means "only by ~, and no other method, will the task be
> accomplished" For example,
>

>> その仕事は二人だけでできます - This job only requires 2 persons. (It doesn't need any
more people)

>>

>> その仕事は二人でだけできます - This job only requires 2 persons. (No more, no less)

