Is Japanese understandable without pitch?


> **Possible Duplicate:**  
>  [How important is one’s pitch when speaking
> Japanese?](https://japanese.stackexchange.com/questions/646/how-important-
> is-ones-pitch-when-speaking-japanese)

I know that the system to avoid confusion between homophones (regardless of if
that was its original purpose) is pitch. The primary standardised Japanese
pitch I heard is the Tokyo dialect's form (correct me if I'm wrong). My
question is if you can be understood without pitch, and how will it reflect
your pronunciation and fluidity. There are many different dialects of
Japanese, are they mutually intelligible on the front of pitch? If I don't
include the standard pitch of the Tokyo dialect (or the local dialect), will I
confuse people, not sound native, or will it be acceptable. If it's acceptable
than will it be more like an acceptable mistake or completely fine? If it is
absolutely necessary (or of any necessity at all) I suppose I'll put in the
extra time needed to learn pitch.




Japanese is mostly understandable to native speakers with incorrect pitch.
There are a few words like "shiro", 城 or 白, which can be confused depending on
context. If you are worried about pitch accent, there are dictionaries of
pronunciation such as the NHK published one, "日本語発音アクセント辞典". This is intended
for native speakers who want to speak like TV announcers.




Japanese is mostly understandable to native speakers with incorrect pitch.
There are a few words like "shiro", 城 or 白, which can be confused depending on
context. If you are worried about pitch accent, there are dictionaries of
pronunciation such as the NHK published one, "日本語発音アクセント辞典". This is intended
for native speakers who want to speak like TV announcers.

