Is 立つ in 顔が立つ is always imperfective? If so why?


I understand that the word
[立つ](http://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/jn/137174/meaning/m0u/) has various meanings,
but basically can be used to describe a state (for inanimate and animate
objects) as well as a process (for animate objects). To describe a state for
inanimate objects both: 立つ and 立っている seem to be accepted forms (ビルが立つ,
ビルが立っている).

Now, an idiomatic expression
[顔が立つ](http://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/jn/37556/meaning/m0u/) is undoubtedly used
to describe a state of "keeping one's face".

**The form 顔が立っている does not seem to be recognised. is my observation wrong?**

What exactly does 立つ mean in this context and why the form 立っている is incorrect?
Is it really a state, or could it be a response to some kind of a ..."periodic
test"? Like "whenever I look at him, his response is 顔が立つ thus he is a man of
honour"?

If the form 顔が立っている is incorrect, how does 立つ in 顔が立つ differ from 立つ in 腹が立つ,
where 腹が立っている is also recognised and used form?




As user4092 suggests in the comments, I don't think 顔が立っている is particularly
incorrect. It's just not frequently said. Some actual examples from the
internet:

  * 彼らの頑張りで、こちらの **顔が立っている** のだから。
  * 嫁が親戚付き合いを自然にこなしてくれるので、俺と俺の親の **顔が立っている** 。
  * その芸能事務所のマネージャーがただそのモデルなりタレントの子達にたいしては **顔が立っている** だけって事でしょう。

* * *

顔が立つ is perhaps more like an action rather than a state, similar to the
English _to save face_. Then it follows that you don't often say “my face is
**being saved/kept** ”.

  * こうすれば部長の顔が立つ _This way we'll **save** the manager's face_
  * こうすると部長の顔が立たない _This will make the manager **lose** face_

I can think of some other 〜が立つ idioms that are also less likely to be used in
〜立っている form:

  * 歯が立たない _insurmountable_
  * 角が立つ _harsh_
  * 口が立つ _eloquent_

