Is the only time 得る read as うる when it's a suffix?


Just wondering If choosing a reading is as simple as whether 得る is a suffix.

This is from tatoeba.org, a wiki-like sentence mine, so I'm not sure if える,
the reading entered is correct.

> 彼はとてもよく訓練された役者だけが本当に成功し得ると思っている。 He thinks that only very well trained
> actors can be really successful.




得る is usually read as える. This is the "modern" verb-form of 得（う） (shimo-
nidan).

Conjugation (MZK/RYK/SSK/RTK/IZK/MRK)

Modern: え/え/える/える/えれ/えよ  
Classic: え/え/う/うる/うれ/えよ

One thing to note is that for MZK and RTK, either conjugation is え, so you
will never-ever read 得ない as "unai" etc, and because you never really see
classical SSK in regular text (since SSK and RTK are read the same in modern
Japanese) you'll probably never have to read it as 得(う). The only time you
read it as うる is if it's a sentence ending or directly modifying something.
But again, the うる reading itself is pretty rare. The only thing I tend to see
is an occasional あり得る(ありうる), but you can read that as (ありえる) anyway.

For that particular sentence: 彼はとてもよく訓練された役者だけが本当に成功し得ると思っている

^I would guess 'しえる', just because える is more common. し得る on my IME comes up
as a candidate for both しえる and しうる.

**Edit:**

[code]

    MZK=未然形=Mizenkei (ex: ない attaches)
    RYK=連用形=Renyoukei (ex: て/た/ます attach)
    SSK=終止形=Shuushikei (ex: end of sentence when NOT a question)
    RTK=連体形=Rentaikei (ex: declarative, bound ending, question ending)
    IZK=已然形=Izenkei (ex: ば (conditional in modern/"when"-only in classical))
    MRK=命令形=Meireikei (ex: imperative "commands") 
    
[/code]




Both readings can be suffixes and both can be used in many of the common
constructions of 得る:

> 当を得る (to be in order):【とうをうる】or 【とうをえる】
>
> あり得る (to be probable): 【ありえる】or 【ありうる】
>
> etc. etc.

[Yahoo dict
says](http://dic.yahoo.co.jp/dsearch?enc=UTF-8&p=%E3%81%88%E3%82%8B&dtype=0&stype=1&dname=0na&pagenum=1&index=01948700):

> ◆[...] また、終止するときは文語形の「うる」となることがあり、特に5の終止形・連体形は「うる」を用いることが多い。→う（得）る

