Splicing である with a topic


I came across this sentence:

> [意気地]{いくじ}なし！そして全くその通りで私はあったのだ。  
>  "Coward! And that was, in fact, exactly what I was."

(From 苦の世界, my translation.)

I found in pretty weird that `私は` dropped in the middle of `である` like that,
when you would normally only see `は`, `も`, or another 係助詞.

My feeling is that this is just a "freer" writing style that kind of breaks
the rule there to make the sentence more dramatic -- is this understanding
correct?




Your understanding is correct except for the part where you said "kind of
breaks the rule". I know what you mean by that, though. There is no written
rule as to what word order is "correct". There only are the most or more
common and the less and least common word orders.

「そして全くその通りで **私は** あったのだ。」 is indeed NOT written in the most common word
order, which would be 「そして **私は** 全くその通りであったのだ。」. As many of you would know,
however, **_Japanese word order can be incredibly flexible on one condition
--- that the correct particles are attached at the right places_**.

Grammatically, である can be treated as one word, which is probably why you feel
it weird being spliced, but native speakers know instinctively that it
consists of two parts で and ある and that the subject for ある could be squeezed
in between --- "in (= で) a certain state + subject + ある(exists)"

By placing the 全くその通り part up front, it was emphasized for an aesthetic
purpose. As you said, the author could have used は or も instead of 私は or even
said just その通りであった（のだ）. However, **_by placing a 私は in a sentence in a
language in which "I" or "me" is not used often, it was also successfully
emphasized in a natural way_**.




Your understanding is correct except for the part where you said "kind of
breaks the rule". I know what you mean by that, though. There is no written
rule as to what word order is "correct". There only are the most or more
common and the less and least common word orders.

「そして全くその通りで **私は** あったのだ。」 is indeed NOT written in the most common word
order, which would be 「そして **私は** 全くその通りであったのだ。」. As many of you would know,
however, **_Japanese word order can be incredibly flexible on one condition
--- that the correct particles are attached at the right places_**.

Grammatically, である can be treated as one word, which is probably why you feel
it weird being spliced, but native speakers know instinctively that it
consists of two parts で and ある and that the subject for ある could be squeezed
in between --- "in (= で) a certain state + subject + ある(exists)"

By placing the 全くその通り part up front, it was emphasized for an aesthetic
purpose. As you said, the author could have used は or も instead of 私は or even
said just その通りであった（のだ）. However, **_by placing a 私は in a sentence in a
language in which "I" or "me" is not used often, it was also successfully
emphasized in a natural way_**.

