Why is connective form missing from this sentence?


Example sentence from 研究社 新和英大辞典 第５版:

> その詩人の発想はまことに融通無碍｛ゆうずうむげ｝、 操る言葉は自由自在だ The poet has a truly unlimited command
> of ideas and manipulates words with complete freedom.

At the moment I can only see it as a compound sentence that could be split
into:

> その詩人の発想はまことに融通無碍（だ）

and

> 操る言葉は自由自在だ

融通無碍 is listed as an noun or adjective (形動) by 大辞泉. Therefore, shouldn't it be
in connective form 融通無碍で～ or ～であり～?

> その詩人の発想はまことに融通無碍で、 操る言葉は自由自在だ。
>
> その詩人の発想はまことに融通無碍であり、 操る言葉は自由自在だ。

Please help me understand the original sentence.




The meaning of this sentence is the same as those with で/であり.

Omitting certain verbs such as だ/です makes this sentence sound somewhat more
rhythmical and crisp. I think this is at least closely related to so-called
体言【たいげん】止【ど】め, a common rhetorical technique in which a sentence is ended with
a noun.




The meaning of this sentence is the same as those with で/であり.

Omitting certain verbs such as だ/です makes this sentence sound somewhat more
rhythmical and crisp. I think this is at least closely related to so-called
体言【たいげん】止【ど】め, a common rhetorical technique in which a sentence is ended with
a noun.

