Can "ので" be used to give the reason after the consequence is mentioned?


I've been told that it's correct with this example:

> 遅れちゃった、寝過ごした **の** で。

But I don't understand why it's used like this because ので is the conjunctive
form of のです so it's used to connect the sentence with the result after (I know
that the result can be omitted) but it's not anymore logic if the result is
given before, why not simply use のです in this case ?




> 「遅{おく}れちゃった、寝過{ねす}ごした **ので** 。」

is a completely normal sentence in the real Japanese-speaking world. Japanese
word order, phrase order and clause order are **_far more flexible_** than it
appears to me that they are taught in Japanese-as-a-foreign-language.

Thus, it is an everyday occurence for certain conjunctions to be located at
the very end of the sentences. You will often see/hear a sentence structure
such as:

> 「(Result/Effect Clause)、+ (Reason/Cause Clause) + ので、から, etc. 。」

which is virtually the same in meaning as:

> 「(Reason/Cause Clause) + ので、から, etc. + (Result/Effect Clause)。」

Conjunctions in general are often placed at the very end of the sentences,
which seems to baffle some learners. Those conjunctions would include:

が、けど、けれども、のに、なのに, etc.




> 「遅{おく}れちゃった、寝過{ねす}ごした **ので** 。」

is a completely normal sentence in the real Japanese-speaking world. Japanese
word order, phrase order and clause order are **_far more flexible_** than it
appears to me that they are taught in Japanese-as-a-foreign-language.

Thus, it is an everyday occurence for certain conjunctions to be located at
the very end of the sentences. You will often see/hear a sentence structure
such as:

> 「(Result/Effect Clause)、+ (Reason/Cause Clause) + ので、から, etc. 。」

which is virtually the same in meaning as:

> 「(Reason/Cause Clause) + ので、から, etc. + (Result/Effect Clause)。」

Conjunctions in general are often placed at the very end of the sentences,
which seems to baffle some learners. Those conjunctions would include:

が、けど、けれども、のに、なのに, etc.

