Can the auxiliary ～やがる be used with passive voice?


I thought I heard someone use it in this way recently, but it just a
conversation I overheard so I cannot be sure exactly. A standard use might be:  
「あいつが邪魔しやがった。」

But can it ever be combined with a passive voice so the speaker can convey
additional inconvenience? For example, something like this:  
「あいつに邪魔されやがった。」This might be ungrammatical or not, I don't know.




「やがる」 used in conjunction with verbs in passive voice forms is totally
possible and grammtical. It is so even though one must know that the said
usage is far less common than with verbs in active voice forms.

One thing I must mention, however, is the fact that when the above-mentioned
usage of 「やがる」 takes place, the subject of the sentence would be a third
person **_far more often_** than it is the speaker himself. Let us take your
sentence as an example:

> 「あいつに邪魔{じゃま}されやがった。」

If given this sentence with absolutely no context, nearly 100% of native
speakers would think that the subject of the sentence would be an unmentioned
third person.

> "(Someone) was f***in' bothered by that dude."

Though you did not say, I had an impression that you were thinking that the
person being bothered was the speaker himself. That is not impossible at all
but it would be rare. That would be a case of **_self-degradation_** or just
plain **_vulgarity_**.

> "I was f***in' bothered by that dude."

To clarify my point regarding the subject being more often a third person than
the speaker, I meant to say you would hear/see sentences like these:

> 「初回{しょかい}にホームラン3本{ぼん}も打{う}たれやがって！」 = "(The pitcher) allowed 3 damn homeruns
> in the first inning!"

The baseball club manager might say that about his starting pitcher. The
contempt is expressed toward the pitcher, not the speaker himself. The subject
「ピッチャー」 is unmentioned here, which should be nothing new to you.




「やがる」 used in conjunction with verbs in passive voice forms is totally
possible and grammtical. It is so even though one must know that the said
usage is far less common than with verbs in active voice forms.

One thing I must mention, however, is the fact that when the above-mentioned
usage of 「やがる」 takes place, the subject of the sentence would be a third
person **_far more often_** than it is the speaker himself. Let us take your
sentence as an example:

> 「あいつに邪魔{じゃま}されやがった。」

If given this sentence with absolutely no context, nearly 100% of native
speakers would think that the subject of the sentence would be an unmentioned
third person.

> "(Someone) was f***in' bothered by that dude."

Though you did not say, I had an impression that you were thinking that the
person being bothered was the speaker himself. That is not impossible at all
but it would be rare. That would be a case of **_self-degradation_** or just
plain **_vulgarity_**.

> "I was f***in' bothered by that dude."

To clarify my point regarding the subject being more often a third person than
the speaker, I meant to say you would hear/see sentences like these:

> 「初回{しょかい}にホームラン3本{ぼん}も打{う}たれやがって！」 = "(The pitcher) allowed 3 damn homeruns
> in the first inning!"

The baseball club manager might say that about his starting pitcher. The
contempt is expressed toward the pitcher, not the speaker himself. The subject
「ピッチャー」 is unmentioned here, which should be nothing new to you.

