形容詞　ending in /ei/ and /ii/


[This page](http://no-sword.jp/blog/2012/09/beki.html) discusses the
"adjective" べき and mentions that if it had evolved like other adjectives, it
would have been べい.

That made me think: **Why are there no 形容詞 ending in /ei/ or /ii/ (except for
/sii/)?** This assumes that we disregard "slang" like わりい, あちい, あけー, やべー etc.

And what is special about べき (the only exception that I can think of)?




A wonderful website linked to me by @snailplane1 categorizes adjectives by
their 39 different endings.

It notes that:

>   * 「エ段＋い」で終わる形容詞は俗語を除いて存在しない。
>   * 「しい」で終わる形容詞は最も数が多い。
>   * 逆に「しい」を除けば、「イ段＋い」で終わる形容詞は、ほとんど存在しない。
>

Though there are a number of interesting things suggested by this data, and
the above observations, two in particular stand out:

  * No adjectives ending `/ei/` exist outside of colloquial language... **but they do exist in colloquial language.**
  * As you notes, aside from those adjectives ending in `/sii/`, there are very few adjectives ending in `/ii/`... **but some examples do exist.**

Some archaic or colloquial examples offered are:

> かいい、かそけい、さやけい、つゆけい、のどけい、はるけい、むくつけい、しんきい、すきずきい、つきづきい、あまねい、いぶせい、いみい、なめい、しげい

I don't claim to know what these words mean or how they are/were used,
however.

Now, "why" is a very difficult question to answer, but the fact that these
words _do_ exist in archaic and colloquial speech suggests that there is more
to this situation. **I hypothesize that the reason these largely don't exist
in standard Japanese is a uniform sound change that occurred in the past**
(though I don't know the details of said sound change).

In my experience, many dialects of Japanese retain more archaic forms (though
this is probably not universally true), so that may explain why some dialects
have words ending in `/ei/`.

The two remaining examples of adjectives ending in `/ii/` are いい and 大きい...
but both of these are a bit special. いい is an irregular form of よい, and 大きい
has the odd form 大きな. While I can't say this with certainty, I suspect these
irregularities have something to do with why they continue to exist in modern
Japanese.

1 <http://homepage3.nifty.com/jgrammar/ja/adjec001.htm>




A wonderful website linked to me by @snailplane1 categorizes adjectives by
their 39 different endings.

It notes that:

>   * 「エ段＋い」で終わる形容詞は俗語を除いて存在しない。
>   * 「しい」で終わる形容詞は最も数が多い。
>   * 逆に「しい」を除けば、「イ段＋い」で終わる形容詞は、ほとんど存在しない。
>

Though there are a number of interesting things suggested by this data, and
the above observations, two in particular stand out:

  * No adjectives ending `/ei/` exist outside of colloquial language... **but they do exist in colloquial language.**
  * As you notes, aside from those adjectives ending in `/sii/`, there are very few adjectives ending in `/ii/`... **but some examples do exist.**

Some archaic or colloquial examples offered are:

> かいい、かそけい、さやけい、つゆけい、のどけい、はるけい、むくつけい、しんきい、すきずきい、つきづきい、あまねい、いぶせい、いみい、なめい、しげい

I don't claim to know what these words mean or how they are/were used,
however.

Now, "why" is a very difficult question to answer, but the fact that these
words _do_ exist in archaic and colloquial speech suggests that there is more
to this situation. **I hypothesize that the reason these largely don't exist
in standard Japanese is a uniform sound change that occurred in the past**
(though I don't know the details of said sound change).

In my experience, many dialects of Japanese retain more archaic forms (though
this is probably not universally true), so that may explain why some dialects
have words ending in `/ei/`.

The two remaining examples of adjectives ending in `/ii/` are いい and 大きい...
but both of these are a bit special. いい is an irregular form of よい, and 大きい
has the odd form 大きな. While I can't say this with certainty, I suspect these
irregularities have something to do with why they continue to exist in modern
Japanese.

1 <http://homepage3.nifty.com/jgrammar/ja/adjec001.htm>

