The role/meaning of なる in 邪魔をするOrganisationなる”羽虫”


Big boss leader with his cronies is looking for something and says:

> 先程の赤いおさげが渡してきたデータによるとあの海岸沿いの何処からしい
>
> **邪魔をするOrganisationなる** ”羽虫”もいるようだがすべて轢き潰して虱潰しにすれば見つかるであろう

Now IMO this basically boils down to:

> according to the data we got from the pig tailed one, it (what they are
> searching for) is somewhere along this coast.
>
> Then there is also those gnats from the meddlesome Organisation, but if we
> smush them one by one, we will be discovered.

The weird bit is the 邪魔をするOrganisationなる”羽虫” specifically "Organisationなる".
Why would you mate a noun and なる without the particle. And I don't really see
に fitting in there. Unless she is trying to say something like "Insects who'll
turn out to be the troublesome organization" or something.

So what's up with that なる?

Also I'm not 100% on who 見つかる refers to (the thing they are looking or them)
buuut I can save that for later.




> 邪魔をするOrganisationなる"羽虫"  
>  a "gnat" called _Organisation_ that disturbs us

This なる is the attributive form of the archaic copula なり. In modern Japanese,
`AなるB` is a stiff and literary way of saying "B in A", "B that is A", "B known
as A" or "B called A", etc.

From 明鏡国語辞典:

> ### なり
>
> ② 《主に連体形「なる」の形で》  
>  ㋐ 《場所を表す語に付いて》そこに存在する意を表す。…にある。「自らの内なる思い」「駿河なる富士の高嶺」  
>  ㋑ 《名詞に付いて》その名を持つ意を表す。…という。「ロートリンゲンなる王国」「前衛芸術なるもの」




> 邪魔をするOrganisationなる"羽虫"  
>  a "gnat" called _Organisation_ that disturbs us

This なる is the attributive form of the archaic copula なり. In modern Japanese,
`AなるB` is a stiff and literary way of saying "B in A", "B that is A", "B known
as A" or "B called A", etc.

From 明鏡国語辞典:

> ### なり
>
> ② 《主に連体形「なる」の形で》  
>  ㋐ 《場所を表す語に付いて》そこに存在する意を表す。…にある。「自らの内なる思い」「駿河なる富士の高嶺」  
>  ㋑ 《名詞に付いて》その名を持つ意を表す。…という。「ロートリンゲンなる王国」「前衛芸術なるもの」

