Patterns (and exceptions) for 自動詞 - 他動詞 pairs


As a 3rd year student of Japanese, I don't have all that wide a vocabulary
yet, but have noticed that, typically, the following patterns are observable
in terms of the word endings for transitive-intransitive verb pairs: 自動詞 and
他動詞 tend have the same "prefix", but end in

  * -u (自) / -eru (他)

> **開く・開ける** 、届く・届ける、進む・進める、続く・続ける、育つ・育てる etc.

  * **-eru (自) / -u (他)**

> **開ける・開く** 、切れる・切る、解ける・解く、裂ける・裂く、焼ける・焼く etc.

  * -aru (自) / -eru (他)

> 下がる・下げる、上がる・上げる、閉まる・閉める、務まる・務める etc.

  * -iru or -eru (自) / -asu (他)

> 出る・出す、覚める・覚ます、溶ける・溶かす、動ける・動かす、生きる・生かす etc.

as well as several other patterns

While I learned many of these words while studying, I compiled this list in
part from [this source](http://nihongo.monash.edu/ti_list.html), which I can't
verify the accuracy of (the page links to a more updated version that doesn't
categorize the pairs by their endings).

One snag that I found myself often caught by is that, especially for the
u<->eru ending pairs, the first dozen or so that I learned all followed the
pattern "transitive looks like potential of intransitive" (unrelated, but same
sound change so it is easy enough to remember, if misleading). I imagine that
most textbooks or courses would introduce 続く・続ける earlier on than 裂ける・裂く, due
to usage frequency and kanji difficulty if nothing else. Encountering the
reverse pattern was a bit confusing for me, because my (ill-founded) intuition
was completely backwards. Even more specifically, I find it especially
confusing that 開く・開ける can be read as あく・あける or ひらく・ひらける, but the two readings
are respectively paired as 自他 and 他自.

Does anyone know, etymologically, how the phonology of transitive-intransitive
pairs developed, and why u<->eru appears in both directions? I initially
thought that I could mostly figure out which was which by intuition and
pattern matching, but it seems that that might be impossible to do
universally.




You can't distinguish '自・他' with 'る・れる' phonology.

'自・他' depends on both type of the verb and the subject of the sentence.

As a premise, 'u aru' is a basic form of verb.

And this basic form must be either intransitive verb or transitive verb.

Note that basic form can't be both type. This can only be one type.

届く is intransitive. So,

荷物が届く is correct usage.

私は荷物を届く is incorrect.

焼く is transitive. So,

私は魚を焼く is correct usage.

魚が焼く is incorrect.

But you can use intransitive type verb as transitive verb with 'eru', and the
reverse is also.

私は荷物を届ける is correct.

荷物が届ける is incorrect.

魚が焼けた is correct.

私は魚が焼けた is incorrect.

In other word, you use basic form when the type of basic form matches your
usage, and use 'eru' form when your usage differ from the type.

So, to distinguish '自・他' completely , you must know type of basic form of all
verbs.

But I don't think this is a hardwork.

Compared with English, in Japanese, it is not usual for things those are not
alive to be a subject.

So, you can pay attention only for intransitive type verbs that take nonhuman
as subject.

Sorry for my poor English...

