Can someone explain the contrastive は to me?


Can someone explain to me how the contrastive は works? As I still don't get
it. How exactly does it work? Is it derived from it's topical cousin? How does
it modify the topic of discourse?

For example, I don't quite understand what the second supposedly contrasting は
is actually doing in this sentence that the conjunctive が isn't already doing:
犬の鳴き声は聞こえるが、犬の姿は見えない。

It's from the Imabi post on the contrastive particle, yet it still doesn't
really explain what's actually going on; thus, I'm just wondering if someone
could help explain this to me.




You shouldn't regard "topic" or "contrast" as ~~a priori~~ something accepted
from the beginning. They are just grammar theories. Different people can
explain は's function either with solely topic or with solely contrast.

Some call it "contrast" when you can find implication that something is
different from something else, and others call secondary topics "contrastive
は" and primary topics "topic".

What's sure about は is that it highlights the thing marked with it and
separates it and lets it float around the rest of the clause.

As for your example, you can interpret it as "As for dog's bark, it's audible.
But as for its figure, it's not visible".

Speaking of emphasis, you can put it on either 犬の姿は or 犬の姿が by stress in
pronunciation. (If you emphasize contrast between voice and figure, it's
better to omit 犬の from 犬の姿.)

If the sentence was 声は…犬の姿 **が** 見えない (without が stressed*1), the latter
sentence would be a sentence of neutral description in this case and the fact
that you can't see them feels abrupt and your mind feels kind of renewed and
occupied with it. In contrast, the original sentence feels like taking 犬の姿 as
only one of agenda (without は stressed).

*1: In that case, it's interpreted as exhaustive listing が.




You shouldn't regard "topic" or "contrast" as ~~a priori~~ something accepted
from the beginning. They are just grammar theories. Different people can
explain は's function either with solely topic or with solely contrast.

Some call it "contrast" when you can find implication that something is
different from something else, and others call secondary topics "contrastive
は" and primary topics "topic".

What's sure about は is that it highlights the thing marked with it and
separates it and lets it float around the rest of the clause.

As for your example, you can interpret it as "As for dog's bark, it's audible.
But as for its figure, it's not visible".

Speaking of emphasis, you can put it on either 犬の姿は or 犬の姿が by stress in
pronunciation. (If you emphasize contrast between voice and figure, it's
better to omit 犬の from 犬の姿.)

If the sentence was 声は…犬の姿 **が** 見えない (without が stressed*1), the latter
sentence would be a sentence of neutral description in this case and the fact
that you can't see them feels abrupt and your mind feels kind of renewed and
occupied with it. In contrast, the original sentence feels like taking 犬の姿 as
only one of agenda (without は stressed).

*1: In that case, it's interpreted as exhaustive listing が.

