Is it wrong to say お姉ちゃんに私のケーキを食べられた instead of 私はお姉ちゃんにケーキを食べられた ? (Passive voice)


I'm trying to better grasp the passive voice in Japanese based on these four
sentences. So far I can tell that the first sentence is direct passive and the
second and third one indirect passive.

>   1. 私はお姉ちゃんに食べられた。
>

  1. This implies that I was eaten by my sister quite literally.

>   2. 私はお姉ちゃんにケーキを食べられた。
>

  2. By having a direct object this implies that MY cake was eaten and not me.

>   3. お姉ちゃんに私のケーキを食べられた
>

  3. Now this is where I was questioning myself if this even acceptable to say. I know the second sentence is the more natural one but I wanted to know if this one is correct or does not make any sense.

>   4. 私のケーキはお姉ちゃんに食べられた。
>

  4. And lastly there is this sentence that is bugging me since I think it has the same meaning as the second one. Only that it is in direct passive form.

Any help clearing the differences will be appreciated.




The third sentence is fine.

>   3. お姉ちゃんに私のケーキを食べられた。
>

I would say it’s more natural than the second as a standalone sentence.

>   2. 私はお姉ちゃんにケーキを食べられた。
>

私は stands out in this sentence as if you are contrasting your situation with
someone else’s.

> 弟はお兄ちゃんに殴られて、私はお姉ちゃんにケーキを食べられた。

If no such contrast is intended, you should remove 私 altogether.

> お姉ちゃんにケーキを食べられた。

Unless context suggests otherwise, you, as the speaker, are still understood
as the “sufferer.”

The difference from #3 is simply that this sentence is less specific about the
cake belonging to you. It could be that your sister ate a cake you had kept
aside for your mother.

The following sentence is also perfectly fine.

> お姉ちゃんにお母さんのケーキを食べられた。

The cake belonged to your mother, but you are the one “suffering” from your
sister eating it.

The fourth sentence is also correct.

>   4. 私のケーキはお姉ちゃんに食べられた。
>

However, it is a statement about your cake (私のケーキ) the way #2 is a statement
about yourself (私). It sounds like you are contrasting your cake with
something else.

> 弟のケーキはまだあるけど、私のケーキはお姉ちゃんに食べられた。

In any case, you are the "sufferer."




1 is a cannibalism, as you say.

2 is the so-called 迷惑の受け身 (see
[this](https://japanese.stackexchange.com/a/50432/45489) for example). In
English, it is usually rendered as _I had my cake eaten by my sister_.

Practically 3 means the same, but due to its meaning (and because it is
clearly a 迷惑の受け身 here), it is obvious that it is MY cake, which makes 私の sound
redundant. What is more natural about 3 than 2 is that it has the subject
omitted. So all in all お姉ちゃんにケーキを食べられた is the most natural.

As for 4, the subject is 私のケーキ and the sentence literally corresponds to _My
cake was eaten by my sister_. It is fine, but perhaps less natural because
inanimate subjects are less frequent in Japanese (I believe). Also, it does
not have the connotation of being harmed (or at least less than 2 and 3).

