Meaning of 抱える other than "hold or carry in the arms"


I found some sentence and I am a bit perplexed by the 抱える, whose first meaning
is “hold or carry in the arms.” I found that it also meant: to have problems;
but how did it acquire its second meaning?

Some example: it is some reflection from a high school student who has some
cynical (but also quite lucid) views about his classroom students.

> 肉食獣にはヒエラルキーがありボスになれなければ死ぬまでストレスを **抱え** 続ける
>
> There's a hierarchy among carnivores.‌ If you can't become the alpha, the
> stress will continue to pile up until you die.

‌




抱える can be safely used with intangible objects such as 負担, ストレス, 仕事 and 借金. In
English it just means "to have". Note that saying ストレスを持つ is wrong and 抱える is
the default verb used with ストレス.

> but how did it acquire its second meaning?

Is it surprising? Many English verbs including "have", "hold", "carry" and
"embrace" take both tangible and intangible objects (e.g., "carry a meaning",
"embrace a policy"), and I have never wondered why. It may be related to the
fact that words like 荷物 ("burden") have both physical and psychological
meanings.




抱える can be safely used with intangible objects such as 負担, ストレス, 仕事 and 借金. In
English it just means "to have". Note that saying ストレスを持つ is wrong and 抱える is
the default verb used with ストレス.

> but how did it acquire its second meaning?

Is it surprising? Many English verbs including "have", "hold", "carry" and
"embrace" take both tangible and intangible objects (e.g., "carry a meaning",
"embrace a policy"), and I have never wondered why. It may be related to the
fact that words like 荷物 ("burden") have both physical and psychological
meanings.

