Is 訴え連日通い a single word? If not, why no particles in between?


I'm reading **`イン. ザ. プール`** , where I found the following clause in one of
its lines:

> 身体の不調を **訴え連日通いつめる** 和雄

I roughly translated it to **"Kazuo who strictly complains about his bad
health on a daily basis."**

What I don't understand is 「 **訴え連日通いつめる** 」

> **1:** I feel like there are 3 words here and not just 1: 訴え、連日、通い, if
> that's the case, why there is no particles in between them?
>
> **2:** If I understand correctly, **つめる is modifying 身体の不調** , but if that
> is the case, what is the function of **訴え連日通い** here? Is it working like an
> adverb and modifying **つめる**?




You can parse it as...

> ｛身体の不調を訴え｝｛連日通いつめる｝和雄

和雄 does two actions: 体の不調を訴える "complains about health problem / says he
doesn't feel well" and 連日通いつめる "visits (somewhere) on consecutive days / every
day".

訴え here is the continuative form (連用形) of the verb 訴える. 連用形 can connect verb
phrases or clauses, like the て form.  
The phrase can be rephrased as 「身体の不調を訴え **て** 、連日～～」, using the て form.

連日 is a noun, and can function adverbially, like 毎日, 今日, 来年 etc.  
eg 「 **毎日** 、学校に通っています。」「 **連日** 働きづめです。」

通いつめる, "pay frequent visits", is a compound verb consisting of 通う (visit) +
詰める (do ~~ continuously, frequently, completely, thoroughly, etc.)




You can parse it as...

> ｛身体の不調を訴え｝｛連日通いつめる｝和雄

和雄 does two actions: 体の不調を訴える "complains about health problem / says he
doesn't feel well" and 連日通いつめる "visits (somewhere) on consecutive days / every
day".

訴え here is the continuative form (連用形) of the verb 訴える. 連用形 can connect verb
phrases or clauses, like the て form.  
The phrase can be rephrased as 「身体の不調を訴え **て** 、連日～～」, using the て form.

連日 is a noun, and can function adverbially, like 毎日, 今日, 来年 etc.  
eg 「 **毎日** 、学校に通っています。」「 **連日** 働きづめです。」

通いつめる, "pay frequent visits", is a compound verb consisting of 通う (visit) +
詰める (do ~~ continuously, frequently, completely, thoroughly, etc.)

