What's the purpose of adding って here?


[![enter image description
here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/ZkVYP.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/ZkVYP.png)

Wouldn't 連れてくれよ be exactly the same?




There is a subsidiary verb (-て)いく. To break down:

  * **連れる** : "to accompany/take"
  * **連れて** : the te-form of 連れる
  * **連れていく** : [(-て)いく](https://japanese.stackexchange.com/q/676/5010) added
  * **連れてく** : the contracted version of 連れていく; see [this chart](https://japanese.stackexchange.com/a/18159/5010)
  * **連れてって** : the te-form of 連れてく; the te-form is not 連れていて because てく still conjugates irregularly like 行く

連れてよ or 連れてくれよ would make no sense in this context. (-て)いく is a **very**
important subsidiary verb, and failing to add it would make the sentence sound
awfully wrong. Whenever you want to say "to take [someone] (to somewhere)",
you need either いく, くる, or keigo equivalents of them.




There is a subsidiary verb (-て)いく. To break down:

  * **連れる** : "to accompany/take"
  * **連れて** : the te-form of 連れる
  * **連れていく** : [(-て)いく](https://japanese.stackexchange.com/q/676/5010) added
  * **連れてく** : the contracted version of 連れていく; see [this chart](https://japanese.stackexchange.com/a/18159/5010)
  * **連れてって** : the te-form of 連れてく; the te-form is not 連れていて because てく still conjugates irregularly like 行く

連れてよ or 連れてくれよ would make no sense in this context. (-て)いく is a **very**
important subsidiary verb, and failing to add it would make the sentence sound
awfully wrong. Whenever you want to say "to take [someone] (to somewhere)",
you need either いく, くる, or keigo equivalents of them.

