How do I interpret this question that ends with よ?


In the [7th
book](https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E5%AD%A6%E5%9C%92%E9%BB%99%E7%A4%BA%E9%8C%B2_HIGHSCHOOL_OF_THE_DEAD#.E7.AC.AC7.E5.B7.BB)
of the awesome [High School of the
Dead](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Highschool_of_the_Dead), there's this
page:

![saeko](https://i.stack.imgur.com/xRWPu.jpg)

The situation is that the main characters, a group of mostly teenagers who are
surviving a zombie apocalypse, are walking through a neighbourhood where some
of them used to live.

The character with the sword, Saeko, says `〈奴ら〉になっているのは君たちの隣人だ……`. Meaning,
"The people in this area that have turned into zombies are your neighbours..."
_(Not an exact translation, of course - I'm adding more context to help
clarify the situation.)_ She's saying that she should go forward and be in a
position to kill zombies because if the other team members recognize a zombie
as someone they used to know, then they might hesitate.

Another character, Takashi, who is one of the people who used to live in the
area responds `……家族をやれるか／ということですか／必要ならきっとーー`. "You mean if we have to kill
someone from our family? If we have to we'll definitely..."

Saeko cuts him off and says
`[友]{・}[達]{・}[と]{・}[家]{・}[族]{・}[は]{・}[違]{・}[う]{・}[よ]{・}？`

That's where I get a little bit lost on the nuance. I get that the baseline of
what she's saying is, "friends and family are different", which I think can be
extrapolated more specifically to, "killing family and killing friends is
different."

But, **because it ends in`よ`, which to me seems like an assertion, but the
sentence also ends with a question mark**, I'm not sure if it's a _rhetorical_
question as a statement or a _sincere_ question. As a response, Takeshi thinks
to a moment when he had to kill a friend, but since I'm not sure of her
statement, I'm not sure of the meaning of his reaction.

Is she saying "Killing family and killing friends is different, don't you
agree?" Meaning that of course, it's different, so you shouldn't think you can
just because you had to kill your friend before. Takeshi was able to actually
kill his friend, but maybe Saeko is saying killing family is harder.

Maybe she's asking "Is killing friends and killing family different?" leaving
it open for Takeshi to consider the difference. Maybe Takeshi then just
reflects on how hard it was to kill his friend, even though he eventually did
it, and realizes that killing his family will be a challenge.

Or maybe she's saying "What's so different about killing friends and killing
family?" Meaning _both_ are difficult. Takeshi then remembers killing his
friend, and this steels his resolve to face up to killing people he might
remember.

Or maybe it's something else entirely. Is what Saeko is saying a genuine
question? What exactly is the subtext of it?

Also, her words all have dots beside them, indicating emphasis (my
understanding of these kinds of dots is that they're like using italics in
English). Is the emphasis for the benefit of the character Takeshi, or for the
reader? And how does the emphasis impact the meaning?




Still no replies... well, I'll give it a shot.

Apparently my intuition about what counts as a "question" or a "rhetorical
question" or "not a question" is absolutely useless, so instead of attempting
to describe things with those terms, I will answer this with some potentially
interesting usages of the question mark in Japanese and my best attempt at
translating them.

For the purposes of the translations, I'd like to add that I speak British
English, and also I play loosely with the question mark where some people are
a lot more strict. I'm perfectly happy with forms such as this in English:

> We will proceed with the next item on the agenda, unless there are any
> questions? No? OK, moving
> along...[*](https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/5619/is-the-
> question-mark-misused-in-affirmative-sentences)
>
> You can join me if you like? _(implied question: would you like to join
> me?)_
>
> Yeah, I thought our team played really well. And, that other match? It went
> to the final game!

Understanding these usages might help understand what Japanese is doing with
the question mark.

Moving on then:

* * *

> ……どうします？ 保留でも結構です **よ？**
>
> What's your choice? Holding back is also acceptable? _(rising tone)_

This corresponds to your example sentence. It's information (よ) with an added
nuance of "you might want to incorporate this information into your decisions
perhaps?"

You could add "you know?" to this sentence, but if you make a habit of doing
that it can become quite repetitive in translation. Depending on how you treat
question marks in English, you may even prefer not to use one here.

"You know?" isn't a perfect match -- this sentence isn't explicitly asking
"did you know what I just told you?", and you can't reply to it with an いいえ
and expect people to infer "I didn't know that."

> ハシゴ、しっかり押さえててくれよ。 あと、ちゃんと上を見てろ **よ？** 俺が手を滑らせて、この金槌を落っことしちまうかもしれねぇからなぁ
>
> Hold the ladder steady for me. And make sure to look up, yeah? If my hand
> slips I might drop this hammer on you.

No response is particularly called for by the question mark. This isn't a "you
know?" but just something indicating "this bit's important, I hope you got
it!"

> あらぁ、必要な話 **よぅ？** だって遺産相続は、その時点で直ちに行なわれなきゃならないもの **よ？**
>
> Oh, but this discussion is _necessary_! (you know?) After all, the
> succession of inheritance has to be performed immediately, then and there!
> (you know?)

An example of how constantly translating as "you know?" can get ridiculous.
The speaker's tone throughout the sentences, added by the two よ？s, is "Do you
realize that your position doesn't stand in light of the facts? Are you sure
you know what you're talking about?", but adding "you know?" constantly is
like adding 、分かってる？ constantly to the Japanese. It's not supposed to be that
explicit.

> …それより、聞いたぞ聞いた **ぞ？** 二人きりで旅行に行ったとな。
>
> But never mind that... a little bird told me you two went on vacation
> together!

Again I feel like "you know?" is misplaced here. The question mark corresponds
to a raised pitch on each of the ぞs, what might be a "light taunting" emphasis
on the words "a little bird told me" in English. The tone that indicates you
know something significant about the listener.

> 恋の資格 **はね？** 自分だけが与えられるの。
>
> The right to love, you know(?), only you can give it to yourself.

No response is called for at the point of the question mark, and in fact it
would be rude to interject, as the speaker is just about to make her point.

> 人生の成功者の余生なんだから、どう過ごそうと勝手だと、周りは温かく **？** 見守ったそうだが‥‥‥
>
> These being the few remaining years of a person successful in life, those
> around him "warmly"(?) watched over him, feeling the time was his to spend
> as he pleased--or so I hear, but...

The implication of the question mark is that the author or speaker is unsure
that 温かく really does describe the situation accurately.

* * *

As for the dots, it implies the character is saying it in a bit more of a
"weighty" fashion. The added "importance" of the line is intended to be
perceived by both the reader and the characters. Sometimes there will be
emphasis dots in a person's internal thoughts; the same applies there, it
indicates that the character thinking those words considers them the important
part of the sentence.




Still no replies... well, I'll give it a shot.

Apparently my intuition about what counts as a "question" or a "rhetorical
question" or "not a question" is absolutely useless, so instead of attempting
to describe things with those terms, I will answer this with some potentially
interesting usages of the question mark in Japanese and my best attempt at
translating them.

For the purposes of the translations, I'd like to add that I speak British
English, and also I play loosely with the question mark where some people are
a lot more strict. I'm perfectly happy with forms such as this in English:

> We will proceed with the next item on the agenda, unless there are any
> questions? No? OK, moving
> along...[*](https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/5619/is-the-
> question-mark-misused-in-affirmative-sentences)
>
> You can join me if you like? _(implied question: would you like to join
> me?)_
>
> Yeah, I thought our team played really well. And, that other match? It went
> to the final game!

Understanding these usages might help understand what Japanese is doing with
the question mark.

Moving on then:

* * *

> ……どうします？ 保留でも結構です **よ？**
>
> What's your choice? Holding back is also acceptable? _(rising tone)_

This corresponds to your example sentence. It's information (よ) with an added
nuance of "you might want to incorporate this information into your decisions
perhaps?"

You could add "you know?" to this sentence, but if you make a habit of doing
that it can become quite repetitive in translation. Depending on how you treat
question marks in English, you may even prefer not to use one here.

"You know?" isn't a perfect match -- this sentence isn't explicitly asking
"did you know what I just told you?", and you can't reply to it with an いいえ
and expect people to infer "I didn't know that."

> ハシゴ、しっかり押さえててくれよ。 あと、ちゃんと上を見てろ **よ？** 俺が手を滑らせて、この金槌を落っことしちまうかもしれねぇからなぁ
>
> Hold the ladder steady for me. And make sure to look up, yeah? If my hand
> slips I might drop this hammer on you.

No response is particularly called for by the question mark. This isn't a "you
know?" but just something indicating "this bit's important, I hope you got
it!"

> あらぁ、必要な話 **よぅ？** だって遺産相続は、その時点で直ちに行なわれなきゃならないもの **よ？**
>
> Oh, but this discussion is _necessary_! (you know?) After all, the
> succession of inheritance has to be performed immediately, then and there!
> (you know?)

An example of how constantly translating as "you know?" can get ridiculous.
The speaker's tone throughout the sentences, added by the two よ？s, is "Do you
realize that your position doesn't stand in light of the facts? Are you sure
you know what you're talking about?", but adding "you know?" constantly is
like adding 、分かってる？ constantly to the Japanese. It's not supposed to be that
explicit.

> …それより、聞いたぞ聞いた **ぞ？** 二人きりで旅行に行ったとな。
>
> But never mind that... a little bird told me you two went on vacation
> together!

Again I feel like "you know?" is misplaced here. The question mark corresponds
to a raised pitch on each of the ぞs, what might be a "light taunting" emphasis
on the words "a little bird told me" in English. The tone that indicates you
know something significant about the listener.

> 恋の資格 **はね？** 自分だけが与えられるの。
>
> The right to love, you know(?), only you can give it to yourself.

No response is called for at the point of the question mark, and in fact it
would be rude to interject, as the speaker is just about to make her point.

> 人生の成功者の余生なんだから、どう過ごそうと勝手だと、周りは温かく **？** 見守ったそうだが‥‥‥
>
> These being the few remaining years of a person successful in life, those
> around him "warmly"(?) watched over him, feeling the time was his to spend
> as he pleased--or so I hear, but...

The implication of the question mark is that the author or speaker is unsure
that 温かく really does describe the situation accurately.

* * *

As for the dots, it implies the character is saying it in a bit more of a
"weighty" fashion. The added "importance" of the line is intended to be
perceived by both the reader and the characters. Sometimes there will be
emphasis dots in a person's internal thoughts; the same applies there, it
indicates that the character thinking those words considers them the important
part of the sentence.

