Can 物 be added to any word to make it mean "things?"


I keep seeing examples of words where 物 is tacked on the end to mean "things."
食べ物, 飲み物, つまらない物, etc. Are there any restrictions as to what can precede 物?
Can I, for example, say something like 青い物, 幸せ物, or even 死に物?

I guess 食べ物 is often translated into English as the noun "food", not "edible
things." Is this merely a more natural translation or does 食べ物 literally imply
"anything that can be eaten" (as opposed to "things that should be/are
typically eaten")?

In French, there are seemingly highly-specific verbs like jaunir (to turn
yellow) and bleuir (to turn blue). They act like they follow a similar pattern
whereby any color can be transformed into a verb of this sort. (My French is
very rusty, so please excuse me if this is an inaccurate assumption.) Does 物
perhaps have a similar flexibility whereby 「Ｘ物」 can always mean something like
"things to Ｘ?"




There are `verb-stem + もの` and `verb-stem + こと`, and these are compound words.
Their meanings are idiosyncratic, and cannot be derived systematically.

Consider:

  * 食べ物 - food (the physical object being eaten)

  * 笑い物 - laughingstock (the physical object(person) being laughed at)

  * 笑い事 - laughing matter (an intangible incident)

  * 遊び物 - plaything/toy (tangible)

  * 遊び事 - recreation (intangible)

Both nouns turn a verb into a thing; 物 turns the verb into a tangible thing
and 事 turns the verb into a conceptual thing.

> Are there any restrictions as to what can precede 物?

I guess your restrictions depend on if you want it to be a tangible thing or a
conceptual thing. Or if it is not possible for the thing to exist tangibly
then there is no compound with 物.




There are `verb-stem + もの` and `verb-stem + こと`, and these are compound words.
Their meanings are idiosyncratic, and cannot be derived systematically.

Consider:

  * 食べ物 - food (the physical object being eaten)

  * 笑い物 - laughingstock (the physical object(person) being laughed at)

  * 笑い事 - laughing matter (an intangible incident)

  * 遊び物 - plaything/toy (tangible)

  * 遊び事 - recreation (intangible)

Both nouns turn a verb into a thing; 物 turns the verb into a tangible thing
and 事 turns the verb into a conceptual thing.

> Are there any restrictions as to what can precede 物?

I guess your restrictions depend on if you want it to be a tangible thing or a
conceptual thing. Or if it is not possible for the thing to exist tangibly
then there is no compound with 物.

