Selecting among words for "invasion" -- 侵攻, 侵略, 攻撃, others


With the invasion of Ukraine, I've heard a few Japanese words used for this
action -- 侵攻 and 侵略 among them. I think I've heard 攻撃 as well, although
perhaps as a more general term for **attack**. A dictionary search for
**invasion** suggests a slew of words, including 侵入 and 侵犯. What words are
most appropriate, are there meaningful nuances among them, and, if relevant,
which are more (or less) likely to be used in everyday conversation?




As for the last question, 攻撃 and 侵入 are ordinary words.

攻撃 is an attack in many contexts. For example the batting side in baseball is
called 攻撃側 (lit. attacking side).

侵入 is entering into a place where one is not supposed to, with or without
armed forces. So the act of sneaking into a house is 侵入, but can't be a 侵攻
(even if s/he has a gun).

* * *

I don't think 侵攻 and 侵略 are clearly distinguished in ordinary speech, but 侵攻
sounds a military advancement into other countries' territory whereas 侵略
sounds an advancement + taking control over the territory. Accordingly, 侵略
sounds worse than 侵攻. (In dictionary terms,
[侵略](https://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/word/%E4%BE%B5%E7%95%A5/#jn-115934) has
'taking territories and possessions of other countries' as an addition to 侵攻).

According to [this](https://waeijisho.net/essay.html?id=300), 侵略 is the
official translation of _aggression_ [as defined by UN](http://un-
documents.net/a29r3314.htm). And 侵攻 is the word for invasion. I suppose
outside specific contexts _aggression_ and _invasion_ are not that clearly
distinguished, and the same is true for 侵略 and 侵攻.

侵犯 is a word used mostly in the context of territorial disputes, meaning an
infringement of (territorial) rights. 領域侵犯 means a country entering another
country's territory and 領海侵犯 is entering the sea (the word often appears in
connection with China). FYI a broader word for infringement of rights is 侵害.

* * *

So, at least from the Western viewpoint, Russia's act can be described as
either of them depending on the focus: 侵入(entering), 侵攻(entering with the
military), 侵略(occupying the territory), or 攻撃(actual bombing etc.)




As for the last question, 攻撃 and 侵入 are ordinary words.

攻撃 is an attack in many contexts. For example the batting side in baseball is
called 攻撃側 (lit. attacking side).

侵入 is entering into a place where one is not supposed to, with or without
armed forces. So the act of sneaking into a house is 侵入, but can't be a 侵攻
(even if s/he has a gun).

* * *

I don't think 侵攻 and 侵略 are clearly distinguished in ordinary speech, but 侵攻
sounds a military advancement into other countries' territory whereas 侵略
sounds an advancement + taking control over the territory. Accordingly, 侵略
sounds worse than 侵攻. (In dictionary terms,
[侵略](https://dictionary.goo.ne.jp/word/%E4%BE%B5%E7%95%A5/#jn-115934) has
'taking territories and possessions of other countries' as an addition to 侵攻).

According to [this](https://waeijisho.net/essay.html?id=300), 侵略 is the
official translation of _aggression_ [as defined by UN](http://un-
documents.net/a29r3314.htm). And 侵攻 is the word for invasion. I suppose
outside specific contexts _aggression_ and _invasion_ are not that clearly
distinguished, and the same is true for 侵略 and 侵攻.

侵犯 is a word used mostly in the context of territorial disputes, meaning an
infringement of (territorial) rights. 領域侵犯 means a country entering another
country's territory and 領海侵犯 is entering the sea (the word often appears in
connection with China). FYI a broader word for infringement of rights is 侵害.

* * *

So, at least from the Western viewpoint, Russia's act can be described as
either of them depending on the focus: 侵入(entering), 侵攻(entering with the
military), 侵略(occupying the territory), or 攻撃(actual bombing etc.)

