How can one stop "去年【きょねん】教職【きょうしょく】" from looking like a weird 4 kanji compound?


In writing, sometimes you get the illusion of a 4-character compound:

> Xさんは **去年教職** を退【しりぞ】いた。

This bothers some non-natives. To correct the "problem", can I always just
place a comma between the kanjis where there is a false 四字熟語?

> Xさんは去年、教職を退いた。

But to me, that does not look good at all. "Xさん" feels too far away from "退く",
right? In this particular case, is this ok?:

> 去年、Xさんは教職を退いた。

So...

  * Is there a general rule for correcting the false 四字熟語 "problem"? 
  * Do native speakers not mind false 四字熟語? 
  * Is it that native speakers do mind, and will try to re-word - but, if they can't create a sentence that they like, then they will just not worry about it and move on?




As with almost anything, there are people who care and others who don't! But
it is definitely a thing to consider if you are trying to write well.

# Degrees of severity

There are two angles to this. One is “trivial“, in that the consideration is
mostly about legibility, flow, and aesthetics. The other is more
consequential, where the “false compound” could **really** throw off the
reader, complicating the interpretation process, and in the worse case cause
them to misinterpret the sentence.

In your example, 「去年教職」 is unlikely to cause a serious problem, at least for
native readers. 去年 is a common enough word, and 去年教職 is hard to conceptualize
as a compound (what would that even mean? I guess it could be read as 「去年教/職」
like a clergy job?). On the legibility side, it helps that 去年 and 教職 are
demarcated by a difference in 画数-density. Still, I understand why one would
want to break up the false compound.

False 3-kanji compounds tend to cause more confusion:

> 最悪値を変える (At worst, I'll change the value?) (I'll change the worst value?)
>
> あなたとは当面面と向かって話せない (I won't be able to talk to you in person for the time
> being)

# Remedies

### The “proper” quick fix is to insert a comma:

> Xさんは去年、教職を退いた。最悪、値を変える。あなたとは当面、面と向かって話せない。

This is good because it matches the flow of how you would read it out loud.

### Where the medium permits, you can “cheat” and insert a narrow space:

> Xさんは去年 教職を退いた。

This is done in informal writing like hand-written letters and online
communication. It's generally not allowed in the body text of publications
(header text can be an exception).

### Some words read better when switched to hiragana:

> 到底底力は出せない → とうてい底力は出せない

Choosing between kanji/hiragana is an art in itself and a serious writer can
be a real stickler for these things. Prestigious publishers may have house
rules. But it's a great technique to build.

### Opt for a synonym:

> 最悪値を変える → いざとなれば値を変える

### Reorder the words:

> 去年、Xさんは教職を退いた。

Now we're into rewrite territory, and this will start to affect the meaning of
the sentence.




As with almost anything, there are people who care and others who don't! But
it is definitely a thing to consider if you are trying to write well.

# Degrees of severity

There are two angles to this. One is “trivial“, in that the consideration is
mostly about legibility, flow, and aesthetics. The other is more
consequential, where the “false compound” could **really** throw off the
reader, complicating the interpretation process, and in the worse case cause
them to misinterpret the sentence.

In your example, 「去年教職」 is unlikely to cause a serious problem, at least for
native readers. 去年 is a common enough word, and 去年教職 is hard to conceptualize
as a compound (what would that even mean? I guess it could be read as 「去年教/職」
like a clergy job?). On the legibility side, it helps that 去年 and 教職 are
demarcated by a difference in 画数-density. Still, I understand why one would
want to break up the false compound.

False 3-kanji compounds tend to cause more confusion:

> 最悪値を変える (At worst, I'll change the value?) (I'll change the worst value?)
>
> あなたとは当面面と向かって話せない (I won't be able to talk to you in person for the time
> being)

# Remedies

### The “proper” quick fix is to insert a comma:

> Xさんは去年、教職を退いた。最悪、値を変える。あなたとは当面、面と向かって話せない。

This is good because it matches the flow of how you would read it out loud.

### Where the medium permits, you can “cheat” and insert a narrow space:

> Xさんは去年 教職を退いた。

This is done in informal writing like hand-written letters and online
communication. It's generally not allowed in the body text of publications
(header text can be an exception).

### Some words read better when switched to hiragana:

> 到底底力は出せない → とうてい底力は出せない

Choosing between kanji/hiragana is an art in itself and a serious writer can
be a real stickler for these things. Prestigious publishers may have house
rules. But it's a great technique to build.

### Opt for a synonym:

> 最悪値を変える → いざとなれば値を変える

### Reorder the words:

> 去年、Xさんは教職を退いた。

Now we're into rewrite territory, and this will start to affect the meaning of
the sentence.

