Why is the suru preceding ningen in its te form in the sentence "Kare wa an'na koto o shite ningen to shite shikkakuda"?


So yeah why is suru in the te form in this sentence "Kare wa an'na koto o
shite ningen to shite shikkakuda"? I'm thinking it is shite to mean "doing"
but it isn't followed by iru. Could iru be silent in this case?

Just to clarify I'm not asking about "to shite", I mean the other shite.




て form without いる means "and", it implies that the first part is followed by
the second in time and that the first one is the cause of the second one (but
not always).

> He doing a thing like that, as a person he is disqualified. -> Because he
> did a thing like that, he is disqualified as a person

て form is certainly weird. It can have an advervial meaning as in ている but also
as a noun-frase when when marked by が or as a clause separator like in this
case. Regarding the tense some people say that it is derived from the last
verb, but I think context is more important speacially when the 3 meanings
kind of get very close to each other.




て form without いる means "and", it implies that the first part is followed by
the second in time and that the first one is the cause of the second one (but
not always).

> He doing a thing like that, as a person he is disqualified. -> Because he
> did a thing like that, he is disqualified as a person

て form is certainly weird. It can have an advervial meaning as in ている but also
as a noun-frase when when marked by が or as a clause separator like in this
case. Regarding the tense some people say that it is derived from the last
verb, but I think context is more important speacially when the 3 meanings
kind of get very close to each other.

