<div class="description">
<p>This thesis compares two potential energy security strategies in the context of Beijing's perceived vulnerabilities  associated with oil imports from Africa and the Arabian Gulf. The first strategy focuses on the diversification of  energy import routes through the development of Pakistani and Burmese transnational pipelines. These pipelines  would arguably strengthen China's energy security by reducing the ability of foreign powers to threaten China's oil  sea-lines-of-communication (SLOCs) from Africa and the Arabian Gulf. The second strategy considers developing a  People's Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) force strength capable of protecting China-bound energy SLOCs in the  Indian Ocean. The overall objective of this thesis is to explore and assess the feasibility of these two energy security  alternatives to determine what path, if any, proves more attractive to Beijing. As this thesis argues, both strategies  prove ineffective at addressing Beijing's energy insecurities in the Indian Ocean. Yet the author submits that Beijing  will still pursue these strategies for reasons of economic benefit, political stability, regional development, and national  pride. In the end, Beijing's energy security does not result from transnational pipelines or strong naval capabilities, but rather, the ability to act as a responsible player on the global stage.
</p>
<br>Subjects: Petroleum; Transportation; China; Trade routes; Energy policy; Sea-power; Geopolitics; National security; Asia</div>
<div class="fn value">
Johnston, Corey S.</div>
Internet Archive identifier