<div class="description">
<p>thin the U.S. government manage  these preventive programs with little cross-departmental integration to determine where  additional funds could provide the greatest impact. Furthermore, no governmental office  with budgetary or staffing authority exists to direct the overarching effects of these  programs and expenditures as a whole.  This study examines the fiscal prioritization and relative effectiveness of the  primary U.S. programs to prevent acts of nuclear terrorism contrasted against the threat  of a terrorist nuclear attack within the U.S. This effort seeks to bridge departmental lanes  of responsibility, provide a holistic perspective, and identify programs in need of  additional resources and emphasis, as well as efforts that offer comparatively little added  security. This research concludes that while proactive domestic and overseas source  security measures receive appropriate fiscal emphasis, border and cargo security  measures and the supporting research and development efforts do not.
</p>
<br>Subjects: National security; Terrorism; Weapons of mass destruction</div>
<div class="fn value">
Haglund, Sean W.</div>
Internet Archive identifier