<div class="description">
<p>The U.S. Army and Marine Corps are developing guided munitions for cannon artillery. These munitions provide a  significant increase in range and accuracy, but the tactics, techniques, and procedures used to employ them have yet to be  developed. This study is intended to assist with that development by providing a method to determine when to use these  munitions rather than conventional munitions in order to achieve a tactical-level commander's desired objectives.  A combination of multi-attribute utility theory and simulation are used to determine the best ammunition (precision  or conventional) to fire under certain battlefield conditions. The simulation, developed by the U.S. Army Research Laboratory,  provides results on the full range of artillery effects by varying the different battlefield conditions that have the greatest effect  on the accuracy of artillery. The results of simulated artillery fire missions are studied to determine the combination of  battlefield conditions that produce the best results for each type of ammunition.  A decision model is used to account for a commander's expected preferences based on tactical considerations. The  results vary greatly depending on the battlefield conditions and the commander's preferences. One type of projectile does not  clearly dominate the other.
</p>
<br>Subjects: Artillery, Field and mountain; United States; Precision guided munitions; Ordnance; Gunnery</div>
<div class="fn value">
La Rock, Harold L.</div>
Internet Archive identifier