<div class="description">
<p>In this thesis, we examine whether the Navy should maintain its current scope of search and rescue (SAR) resource employment or consider alternative ways to conduct SAR missions. Station SAR services are critical enablers to the generation of naval aviation force readiness; however, use of a multi-mission combat helicopter may not be the most economical method to deliver those services, particularly when balanced with an increasing fleet demand.
We analyzed existing fleet inventory, personnel, and operational demand data at Naval Air Station at Lemoore, CA.  We considered several options to alleviate the demand placed on the inventory of helicopters within the squadron and developed three distinct courses of action: procuring different aircraft, changing the location for the base of operations, or maintaining the status quo.  Our cost benefit analysis results show that procuring a different aircraft in order to make the MH-60S available for other missions is a rather costly option.  While the status quo remains the most economical option for providing current SAR capabilities, to support efficient future SAR capabilities, we recommend relocating the base of operations to Salinas, CA.
</p>
<br>Subjects: personnel; manpower policy; manpower policy issues; search and rescue; cost benefit analysis; cost efficiency analysis; naval aviation; Navy aviation; analysis of alternatives; MH-60S helicopter; commercial outsourcing; special studies; military; Navy; Marine Corps; requirements; determination; leadership; outsourcing; Naval Air Station; cost effectiveness</div>
<div class="fn value">
<dl><dd>Miller, Terry M.</dd>
<dd>Rollenhagen, Tobin J.</dd>
<dd>Everhart, Nichalos</dd></dl></div>
Internet Archive identifier