<div class="description">
<p>The study of a law enforcement response to a national movement is a homeland security issue. How America polices its population establishes the benchmark for how it treats the world and is worthy of exploration. What can the experiences of four major U.S. cities, in their response to the Occupy Movement, tell us about using emergent strategies for policing protest in the twenty-first century? In the fall of 2011, the Occupy Movement protests swept across the United States in a matter of weeks. Activists demonstrated against income inequality and the state of the economy, and they established camps in major urban areas, occupying public spaces. I conducted case studies of New York City; Oakland, California; Portland, Oregon; and Dallas, Texas, and analyzed the results. That analysis revealed common themes, including a lack of negotiated management, restricting access to traditionally open public spaces by the police and the use of emergent practice in the complex adaptive environment of demonstrations. From this analysis, I am able to provide strategic recommendations for city and police leaders in dealing with protests in the twenty-first century utilizing a sense-making framework that will assist leaders in strategic planning for protests for large and small cities alike.
</p>
<br>Subjects: Occupy Movement; policing protest; dissent; negotiated management; strategic incapacitation; command and control; Cynefin framework; strategic planning; police militarization; Occupy Wall Street; Occupy Portland; Occupy Oakland; Occupy Dallas; Occupy New York; demonstration; activists; 2011; protester; complex adaptive environment; emergent practice; strategies; community oriented policing; 21st century strategies; protestors; civil protest</div>
<div class="fn value">
Geron, Stephen Max</div>
Internet Archive identifier