<div class="description">
<p>This study provides analysis, conclusions and recommendations to assist the Deputy Commandant (DC), Manpower and Reserve Affairs Department (M&amp;RA) and DC, Programs and Resources Department (P&amp;R) in structure and process decisions concerning Marine Corps Manpower budget execution. DC, M&amp;RA is the owner of the Marine Human Resource Development Process (HRDP) and the Military Personnel Marine Corps (MPMC) appropriation sponsor, while the DC, P&amp;R has budgetary (1517) authority for MPMC budget execution. In contrast, the Navy has both sponsorship and 1517 authority within one cell at N1. By comparing these two services' organizational factors and Planning, Programming, Budgeting, and Execution Systems (PPBES), relevant differences surface, conclusions are drawn, and recommendations offered for improvements. Recommendations include realignment of 1517 authority within MPMC execution, and the melding of the Programs and Budget Branch of Manpower Plans Division, M&amp;RA with the Military Personnel Branch, Fiscal Division, P&amp;R (RFM). This new office will be responsible for all facets of MPMC programming, budgeting, and execution.
</p>
<br>Subjects: Manpower planning; United States; Budget; Deputy Commandant; DC; Manpower and Reserve Affairs Department (M&amp;RA); Programs and Resources Department (P&amp;R); Marine Corps Manpower Budget Execution; Marine Human Resource Development Process (HRDP); Military Personnel Marine Corps (MPMC); N1; 1517 authority; Planning, Programming, Budgeting and Execution Systems (PPBES); Programs and Budget Branch of Manpower Plans Division; Military personnel branch; Fiscal division; P&amp;R (RFM)</div>
<div class="fn value">
<dl><dd>Barry, John C.</dd>
<dd>Gillikin, Paul L.</dd></dl></div>
Internet Archive identifier