<div class="description">
<p>This project is designed to provide a policy recommendation for transitioning custody of  NAVSEA's Interim Supply Support to NAVSUP based on the analysis of current  business practices at NAVSEA, NAVICP-P and NAVAIR. NAVSEA has identified that  it has OMandS valued at 7.386 billion dollars; ISS is a subset of OMandS. Decisions made in the ISS phase may result in the Navy buying parts that will receive zero demand. In effect,  ISS is a birthplace, but not the only birthplace, of some OMandS that are eventually  categorized as excess material. A more efficient ISS process would result in lower  excess material and financial savings. The data set analyzed contained ISS purchased by  both NAVAIR and NAVSEA, as well as demand data. Additionally, analysis of current  ISS processes at NAVAIR and NAVSEA was conducted. The research resulted in  finding that NAVAIR and NAVICP-P have partnered in ISS management. The  recommendations are that, in transitioning NAVSEA's ISS to NAVSUP, a partnership  must be formed that develops clear business rules allowing NAVSEA input into ISS  management, and that NAVICP-M should develop a dedicated staff to provide ISS  support to NAVSEA's Program Management Offices.
</p>
<br>Subjects: Material accountability.; Interim Supply Support (ISS); Material Support Date (MSD); Asset Visible consumption; Logistics Element Manager (LEM); Operating Material and Supplies (OMandS); Sponsor Owned Material (SOM); Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA),Naval Supply Systems Command (NAVSUP); Naval Air Systems Command (NAVAIR);</div>
<div class="fn value">
<dl><dd>Osborne, Steven</dd>
<dd>Stickel, Ryan</dd>
<dd>Skinner, Fred</dd></dl></div>
Internet Archive identifier