<div class="description">
<dl><dd>"December 1998."</dd>
<dd>Thesis advisor(s): John K. Schmidt, Lyn R. Whitaker</dd>
<dd>Thesis (M.S. in Operations Research) Naval Postgraduate School, December 1998</dd>
<dd>Includes bibliographical references (p. 77-83)</dd>
<dd>U.S. Navy Submarine Approach Officers (AO) use tactical skills acquired from years at sea and a seemingly natural panache to accurately determine an enemy submarine's bearing range, course, and speed. This thesis investigates the effects of AO demographic differences and combat system employment methodologies on the ability to develop a timely and accurate firing solution. Employing a low-resolution submarine combat simulator, approximately 10 percent of the total pool of AO's were taken through two of four pre-scripted initial contact scenarios. The AO's were instructed to execute each scenario until they perceive that an accurate solution is obtained on the enemy submarine. The demographic differences of geographic location, ship type, and duty type are the top three traits that distinguish between success and failure. Further data analysis reveals differences in the information utilization of the simulator between successful and unsuccessful operators. Additionally, utilizing a survey administered to the subjects and basic display design principles, a notional command workstation for the next generation of submarine is developed. The conclusions of this research provide insight into the cognitive modeling, training, and selection of AO's, as well as adding to the growing body of work in the design of military decision support systems</dd>
<dd>Mode of access: World Wide Web</dd>
<dd>System requirements: Adobe Acrobat reader</dd>
<dd>US Navy (USN) author</dd>
<dd>dk/dk cc:9116 02/12/99</dd></dl><br>Subjects:</div>
<div class="fn value">
Soldow, David S.</div>
Internet Archive identifier