 I know people have had this discussion, so I'm not trying to say that we're reinventing the wheel here because people have, but it's got lost in the discussion, and I'm guilty of it as well. I didn't think that the Lakers should have done it if they wanted to do it. If LeBron was a 20-year member of the Cleveland Cavaliers and the Cavs had the 55th pick, then go ahead and do it. I didn't think that the equity that LeBron had with the Lakers was enough for the Lakers to make this sort of selection. But I do think what gets lost in all of this is