text:  But it gets to the same result. So it's an internal matter, a mistake that was made there. I'm sure a very unpleasant day for some employees there within the Supreme Court. But it does look like it was simply a mistake. And it wasn't anything that affected votes or changed anything with the ultimate outcome of the opinion, which was actually released a day later. Explain the opioid settlement ruling, if you would. What's the argument against its validity?