 could nevertheless thwart that prosecution simply because some of the evidence involves official acts, really I think is hard to square with basic principles of evidentiary law. And it's really, I think, going to make it impossible, even in cases here where we might all agree that the former president at issue ought to be prosecuted for prosecutors to make their case. We'll see what happens in the New York case. I think Jonathan's probably right. But to me, that more than the substantive immunity holding was the biggest, most important,