 Why does she conclude that? She's the one that mentioned that. Play a little bit more of this. To be completely clear. Who's the they then? Let's be very specific. Well, that's what the investigation is, too. Was it local law enforcement that had made the mistakes? Or was there something to it? Was there other types of things that we need to be analyzing or looking at and providing analysis? My point is that when something's so significant, you're talking about something that hasn't happened in decades, right?