text:  And the issue, obviously, was that if the federal government's doing it, then it's a violation of free speech. If it's a private company that's doing it, then it's not. But the justices, they decided they weren't going to take the case because of a lack of standing by the petitioner. So it doesn't mean that the case doesn't have merit. It just meant that they didn't feel the person had it. In my opinion, this was a political move. They said, we don't want to do it.