text:  would have this authority to protect them. It's a shield that is not absolute, but boy, it goes very far. What is the next step? I mean, we'd say, okay, well, this is the process and we have to live with it until there are new justices on the court? So there's language circulating among law professors, and I hope it'll circulate more broadly, that proposes a new constitutional amendment that basically reverses what the court did. That's the cleanest way to do it. But of course, it's not easy even to get all the law professors in the world to sign it.