text:  Yeah, so let's turn to that question. Like, what does this opinion do with respect to the presidency and our democracy writ large, including the possibility of a second Trump term? Because of the kind of immunity the court has embraced and the kind of immunity it might embrace still, you know, again, it wasn't ruling out absolute immunity. They are placing the president above the law. They are saying as long as the president does something within the president's official duties, it doesn't matter why the president does it. If the president is doing so for corrupt or personal or vindictive or vengeful ends,