 company policy. And so she says that there is some evidence that indicates the platforms, as she says, had independent incentives to moderate content. Is this an issue where justices kind of have to figure out where these lines exist in these types of challenges? In other words, what is coercion? How do we know if it's coercion versus how do we know if it's the government just offering its expert opinion as many other outside firms seem to have done as well?